	ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

	40 CFR Part 52

	[EPA-R03-OAR-2007-0200; FRL-         ]

	Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Virginia;

Amendments to the Open Burning Regulation

AGENCY:  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:  Final rule.

SUMMARY:  EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia.  This SIP revision pertains
to the amendments of Virginia’s open burning regulation.  EPA is
approving this SIP revision in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA).

EFFECTIVE DATE:  This final rule is effective on [insert date 30 days
from date of publication].

ADDRESSES:  EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
ID Number EPA-R03-OAR-2007-0200.  All documents in the docket are listed
in the www.regulations.gov website.  Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.  Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form.  Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.  Copies of the State
submittal are available at Virginia Department of Environmental Quality,
629 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia, 23219.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Rose Quinto,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
e-mail at   HYPERLINK<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I.  Background

On June 7, 2007 (72 FR 31493), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the Commonwealth of Virginia.  The NPR proposed
approval of the amendments to Virginia’s open burning regulation (9
VAC 5, Chapter 40, Part II, Article 40, Sections 5-40-5600 through
5-40-5630).  The formal SIP revision was submitted by the Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ) on February 5, 2007.  The
provisions of Virginia’s open burning regulation and the rationale for
EPA's proposed action are explained in the NPR and will not be restated
here.  On July 9, 2007, EPA received comments from VADEQ on the June 7,
2007 NPR.  The comments state that they are not to be considered adverse
to EPA’s proposed action; rather, VADEQ requests that EPA revise the
preamble to the rule where the preamble is arguably inconsistent with
Virginia’s submittal.  A summary of those comments and EPA’s
responses are provided in Section II of this document.

II.  Summary of Public Comments and EPA Responses

Comment:  The commenter requests to correct the following under the
“Summary of SIP Revision,” the list of volatile organic compound
(VOC) emission control areas:

Western Virginia Emissions Control Area:  Add “Roanoke City;” change
“Salem County” to “Salem City;” and change “Winchester
County” to “Winchester City.”

Hampton Roads Emissions Control Area:  Add “Gloucester County” and
“Isle of Wight County” and change “Suffolk County” to Suffolk
City.”

Richmond Emissions Control Area:  Add “Prince George County” and
“Petersburg City.”

Response:  EPA acknowledges that the June 7, 2007 proposal inadvertently
omitted the above- referenced geographic areas, which were included in
Virginia’s submittal.

Comment:   The commenter requests that the seasonal restrictions in 9
VAC 5-40-5630(A)(8) and 9 VAC 5-40-5630(A)(10) as applying in the County
of Gloucester and the County of Isle of Wight not become part of
Virginia SIP until 2009.

Response:  The effective date of this approval is 2009; therefore this
comment is moot.

Comment:  The commenter requests to remove the terms “landfill,”
“local landfill” and “salvage operation” from the list of
definitions affected by this SIP approval, since no changes were made to
these definitions.  The commenter requests to add the term
“junkyard” in the list of definitions, since a change was made to
this definition.

Response:  EPA agrees that Virginia’s submittal did not change the
definitions of the terms “landfill,” “local landfill” and
“salvage operation,” which were inadvertently included in the June
7, 2007 notice as having been changed.  EPA also agrees that Virginia
added the term “junkyard” although this term was inadvertently
omitted from the list of changes in the SIP Revision Summary of the
notice.

Comment:  The commenter requests to replace the following statement
contained in the preamble:  “This SIP revision provides for the
control of open burning and use of special incineration devices for
destruction of rubber tires, asphaltic materials, crankcase oil,
impregnated wood or other rubber or petroleum based materials except
when conducting bona fide fire fighting instruction at fire fighting
training schools having permanent facilities.  This SIP revision also
provides for the control of open burning and use of special incineration
device for the destruction of hazardous waste or containers for such
materials.  In addition, this SIP revision provides for the control of
open burning and use of special incineration device for the purpose of
salvage operation or for the destruction of commercial/industrial
waste.”

The commenter suggests replacing that statement with:  “The
destruction of rubber tires, asphaltic materials, crankcase oil,
impregnated wood or other rubber or petroleum based materials is
prohibited by open burning or the use of special incineration devices
except when conducting bona fide fire fighting instruction at
firefighting training schools having permanent facilities.  Open burning
or the use of special incinerator devices is also prohibited for the
destruction of hazardous waste or containers for such materials as well
as for salvage operations or for the destruction of
commercial/industrial waste.”

Response:  EPA agrees that VADEQ’s suggested replacement statement is
an accurate synopsis of the rule, and should replace EPA’s statement
from the rule proposal.

III.  General Information Pertaining to SIP Submittals from the
Commonwealth of Virginia

In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation that provides, subject to certain
conditions, for an environmental assessment (audit) “privilege” for
voluntary compliance evaluations performed by a regulated entity.  The
legislation further addresses the relative burden of proof for parties
either asserting the privilege or seeking disclosure of documents for
which the privilege is claimed.  Virginia's legislation also provides,
subject to certain conditions, for a penalty waiver for violations of
environmental laws when a regulated entity discovers such violations
pursuant to a voluntary compliance evaluation and voluntarily discloses
such violations to the Commonwealth and takes prompt and appropriate
measures to remedy the violations.  Virginia's Voluntary Environmental
Assessment Privilege Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1198, provides a privilege
that protects from disclosure documents and information about the
content of those documents that are the product of a voluntary
environmental assessment.  The Privilege Law does not extend to
documents or information (1) that are generated or developed before the
commencement of a voluntary environmental assessment; (2) that are
prepared independently of the assessment process; (3) that demonstrate a
clear, imminent and substantial danger to the public health or
environment; or (4) that are required by law.

On January 12, 1998, the Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the
Attorney General provided a legal opinion that states that the Privilege
law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1198,  precludes granting a privilege to
documents and information “required by law,” including documents and
information “required by Federal law to maintain program delegation,
authorization or approval,” since Virginia must “enforce Federally
authorized environmental programs in a manner that is no less stringent
than their Federal counterparts. . . .”   The opinion concludes that
“[r]egarding ( 10.1-1198, therefore, documents or other information
needed for civil or criminal enforcement under one of these programs
could not be privileged because such documents and information are
essential to pursuing enforcement in a manner required by Federal law to
maintain program delegation, authorization or approval.”

Virginia's Immunity law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1199, provides that “[t]o
the extent consistent with requirements imposed by Federal law,”  any
person making a voluntary disclosure of information to a state agency
regarding a violation of an environmental statute, regulation, permit,
or administrative order is granted immunity from administrative or civil
penalty.  The Attorney General's January 12, 1998 opinion states that
the quoted language renders this statute inapplicable to enforcement of
any Federally authorized programs, since “no immunity could be
afforded from administrative, civil, or criminal penalties because
granting such immunity would not be consistent with Federal law, which
is one of the criteria for immunity.”

Therefore, EPA has determined that Virginia's Privilege and Immunity
statutes will not preclude the Commonwealth from enforcing its program
consistent with the Federal requirements.  In any event, because EPA has
also determined that a state audit privilege and immunity law can affect
only state enforcement and cannot have any impact on Federal enforcement
authorities, EPA may at any time invoke its authority under the CAA,
including, for example, sections 113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to enforce
the requirements or prohibitions of the state plan, independently of any
state enforcement effort.  In addition, citizen enforcement under
section 304 of the CAA is likewise unaffected by this, or any, state
audit privilege or immunity law.

III.  Final Action

EPA is approving the amendments to the open burning regulation (9 VAC 5,
Chapter 40, Part II, Article 40, Sections 5-40-5600 through 5-40-5630)
as a revision to the Virginia SIP submitted on February 5, 2007.

IV.   Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A.   General Requirements

Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal
regulations.  42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).  Thus, in reviewing
SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the CAA.  Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.  For that
reason, this action:

is not a “significant regulatory action” subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993);

does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);

is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);

does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order
13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997);

is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211
(66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the
CAA; and

does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects,
using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP
is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA
notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.

B.   Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the
rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to
each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United
States.  EPA will submit a report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register.  A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register.
 This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

C.  Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by [Insert date 60 days from date of publication of
this document in the Federal Register].  Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.

This action, approving the amendments of Virginia’s open burning
regulation, may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements.  (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

_January 22, 2009                                            /s/_
                              _

Dated:                            			 William T. Wisniewski,
                    							 Acting Regional Administrator,

                                  				 Region III.

40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52 - [AMENDED]

1.  The authority citation for 40 CFR part 52 continues to read as
follows:

               Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart VV ( Virginia

2.  In ( 52.2420, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising the
entries for 9 VAC 5, Chapter 40, Part II, Article 40, Sections 5-40-5600
through 5-40-5630 to read as follows:

( 52.2420  	Identification of plan.

*	*	*	*	*

(c) * * *

	EPA-APPROVED VIRGINIA REGULATIONS AND STATUTES

State citation     (9 VAC 5)	Title/subject	State effective date	EPA
approval date	Explanation [former SIP citation]

*     *     *     *     *    *     *

Chapter 40	Existing Stationary Sources

*     *     *     *     *    *     *

Part II	Emission Standards

*     *     *     *     *    *     *

Article 40  	Open Burning (Rule 4-40)

5-40-5600	Applicability	10/18/06	[Insert Federal Register publication
date] [Insert page number where the document begins]	Provisions of
Article 40 expanded to new localities in the emissions control areas.

5-40-5610	Definitions 	10/18/06	[Insert Federal Register publication
date] [Insert page number where the document begins]	Terms added:
“Air curtain incinerator,” “Clean lumber,” “Wood waste,” and
“Yard waste.”

Terms revised:  “Clean burning waste,” “Clean wood,”
“Commercial waste,” “Construction waste,” “Debris waste,”
“Demolition waste,” “Garbage,” “Hazardous waste,”
“Household waste,” “Industrial waste,” “Junkyard,” “Open
burning,” “Open pit incinerator,” “Refuse,” “Sanitary
landfill,” and “Special incineration device.”

5-40-5620	Open burning prohibitions	10/18/06	[Insert Federal Register
publication date] [Insert page number where the document begins]

	5-40-5630	Permissible open burning	10/18/06	[Insert Federal Register
publication date] [Insert page number where the document begins]

	*     *     *     *     *    *     *

 *    *     *     *      *

 PAGE  10


[Federal Register: May 31, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 104)]
[Notices]
[Page 30907]
[DOCID:fr31my06-77]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-362-000]

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

May 24, 2006.
    Take notice that on May 18, 2006, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to
become effective June 18, 2006:

Third Revised Sheet No. 123
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 135F
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 283
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 312
Tenth Revised Sheet No. 313
Tenth Revised Sheet No. 322

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-8340 Filed 5-30-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 22 (Thursday, February 1, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4597-4598]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01854]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R08-OAR-2017-0339; FRL-9973-17-Region 8]

Montana Second 10-Year Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for
Missoula

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to re-approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Montana. On September 19, 2016, the Governor
of Montana submitted to the EPA a Clean Air Act (CAA) section 175A(b)
second 10-year maintenance plan for the Missoula, Montana area for the
carbon monoxide (CO) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS).
This limited maintenance plan (LMP) addresses maintenance of the CO
NAAQS for a second 10-year period beyond the original redesignation.
This action is being taken under sections 110 and 175A of the CAA.

DATES: Effective February 1, 2018.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID Number EPA-R08-OAR-2017-0339. All documents in the docket are
listed on the http://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through http://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adam Clark,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The factual background for this action is discussed in detail in
our September 14, 2017 direct final rule (DFR) and proposal (82 FR
43180, 82 FR 43208) approving the revised Missoula Maintenance Plan
into the Montana SIP. The EPA received one adverse comment on the
rulemaking and attempted to withdraw the DFR prior to the effective
date of November 13, 2017. However, the EPA inadvertently did not
withdraw the DFR prior to that date and the rule became prematurely
effective on November 13, 2017, revising the Montana SIP to reflect the
approval of the revised Missoula Maintenance Plan. In this final
rulemaking, the EPA is responding to the comments submitted on the
proposed revision to the Montana SIP, and is re-approving the revised
Missoula Maintenance Plan into the Montana SIP. The background
information found in the DFR is still relevant and our September 14,
2017 proposal provides the basis for this final action.
    The EPA finds that there is good cause under section 553(d)(3) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to make this action re-approving
the revisions to the Montana SIP effective upon publication in the
Federal Register. Section 553(d)(3) of the APA allows an effective date
less than 30 days after publication ``as otherwise provided by the
agency for good cause found and published with the rule.'' 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). This rule does not create any new regulatory requirements
and does not change any existing regulatory requirements. For these
reasons, the EPA finds good cause under APA section 553(d)(3) for the
re-approval to become effective on the date of publication of this
action.

II. Response to Comments

    The EPA received two anonymous public comments, one which we
considered adverse, on our action to approve Montana's September 19,
2016 SIP submittal. Below is a summary of each comment and the EPA's
response.
    Comment: The first commenter asked whether we were ``expecting any
push-back'' from businesses in extending the carbon monoxide plan for
another 10 years.
    Response: Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
actions, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. With that,
the EPA notes that we did not receive any comments from any individual
businesses or business groups.
    Comment: The second commenter asserted that the EPA had failed to
consider the effects of approving the SIP submission on the economy or
energy independence as required by a March

28, 2017 Executive Order entitled ``Promoting Energy Independence and
Economic Growth.'' (E. O. 13783).
    Response: Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
actions, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. The EPA
cannot consider disapproving a SIP submission or require any changes
based on E. O. 13783.

III. Final Action

    The EPA is re-approving the revised Missoula Maintenance Plan
submitted on September 19, 2016. This maintenance plan meets the
applicable CAA requirements, and we have determined it is sufficient to
provide for maintenance of the 8-hour CO NAAQS over the course of the
second 10-year maintenance period out to 2027. This rule, which
responds to the adverse comment received, finalizes our proposed
approval of the revised section of Montana's SIP.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state actions,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves some state law provisions as meeting federal
requirements; this action does not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP does not apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated
that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the
rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by April 2, 2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See CAA section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: January 24, 2018.
Debra H. Thomas,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart BB--Montana

0
2. Section 52.1373 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.1373  Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.

* * * * *
    (d) Revisions to the Montana State Implementation Plan, revised
Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for Missoula, as submitted by the
Governor on September 19, 2016 (as approved by the EPA on February 1,
2018).

[FR Doc. 2018-01854 Filed 1-31-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: July 2, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 128)]
[Notices]
[Page 37947-37949]
[DOCID:fr02jy08-75]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

June 25, 2008.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC08-103-000.
    Applicants: Potomac Electric Power Company, Sempra Energy Trading
LLC, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc.
    Description: Potomac Electric Power Co et al submits an application
for authorization to transfer its RPM Capacity Rights.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080625-0054.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: EC08-104-000.
    Applicants: Weyerhaeuser Company, International Paper Company.
    Description: Application of Weyerhaeuser Company and International
Paper Company for Authorization under Federal Power Act Section 203,
Request for Consideration, and Request for Waivers.
    Filed Date: 06/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080625-5004.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, July 15, 2008.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER97-3834-017.
    Applicants: DTE Energy Trading, Inc.
    Description: DTE Energy, Trading, Inc submits application for
Category 1 Status in All Regions Except the Central Region and
submission of Substitute Second Revised Sheet 1A et al to Rate Schedule
FERC 1 pursuant to Order 697-A.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080625-0053.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER98-855-010.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Electric Power Company.
    Description: Wisconsin Electric Power Co submits an errata to their
5/23/08 compliance filing to provide proper citation for the
Commission's consideration pursuant to Order 697-A.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080624-0171.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER01-1011-017; ER01-1335-015; ER01-642-013; ER07-
312-005.
    Applicants: Redbud Energy LP; Magnolia Energy LP; CottonWood Energy
Company LP; Dogwood Energy LLC.
    Description: Cottonwood Energy Company, LP et al submits notice of
change in status.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080625-0050.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER03-191-003.
    Applicants: Peaker LLC.
    Description: Peaker, LLC submits a request for Category 1 Seller
classification.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080624-0028.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER04-230-036; ER01-1385-033; ER01-3155-024; EL01-
45-032.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.;
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
    Description: Fourteenth quarterly report on progress to resolve the
issue of penalty exemptions for grouped generating facilities whose
output is metered at a single location during start-up and shutdown
period.
    Filed Date: 06/20/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080620-5207.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 11, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-426-001; ER06-1257-001; ER05-1398-002; ER03-
1085-005.
    Applicants: Covanta Delaware Valley, L.P., Covanta Essex Company,
Covanta Niagara, L.P., Covanta Union, Inc.
    Description: Covanta Delaware Valley, LP et al submits their
triennial market power analysis.
    Filed Date: 06/20/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080624-0040.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 11, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-658-002.
    Applicants: Harvard Dedicated Energy Limited.
    Description: Harvard Dedicated Energy Limited submits a filing
explaining why they qualify as a Category 1 seller of wholesale
electricity in the Northeast region of the United States etc.
    Filed Date: 06/20/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080624-0041.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 11, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-686-001.
    Applicants: PEPCO Holdings, Inc.
    Description: Potomac Electric Power Company responds to the
Commission's 5/23/08 letter requesting additional information in
support of the PHI Companies' request for a transmission rate incentive
etc.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080624-0025.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-728-001.
    Applicants: Florida Power Corporation.
    Description: Progress Energy Florida Inc submits its compliance
filing which concerns Florida Power Corporation which concerns FPC's
cost-based power sales agreement with Seminole Electric Cooperative,
Inc.
    Filed Date: 06/20/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080624-0026.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 11, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-749-001.
    Applicants: Southwestern Public Service Company.
    Description: Southwestern Public Service Company informs that on 3/
31/08 SPS submitted a rate case filing in their proceeding, pursuant to
Section 205 of the Federal Power Act, proposing a rate increase for its
full-requirement wholesale customers.
    Filed Date: 06/20/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080624-0017.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 11, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-824-001.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.

    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits their compliance
filing, in compliance with FERC's 6/12/08 Order.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080625-0049.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-825-001.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc submits title page to the
Large Generator Interconnection Agreement, Service Agreement 1168.
    Filed Date: 06/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080625-0046.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, July 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1050-001.
    Applicants: Dragon Energy LLC.
    Description: Dragon Energy, LLC submits revisions to its
application for authorization to make wholesale sales of energy and
capacity at negotiated market based rates and proposed Rate Schedule 1.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080625-0045.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 3, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1089-001.
    Applicants: Port Washington Generating Station LLC.
    Description: Port Washington Generating Station, LLC submits a
Title Page to their 6/6/08 notification of termination of the Rate
Schedule 1.
    Filed Date: 06/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080625-0044.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, July 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1117-000.
    Applicants: DC Energy Southwest, LLC.
    Description: DC Energy Southwest, LLC submits FERC Electric Tariff,
Original Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080625-0043.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1125-000.
    Applicants: Brookfield Renewable Energy Marketing US.
    Description: Application for market-based rate authorization and
certain waivers and blanket authorizations and motion for expedited
treatment re Brookfield Renewable Energy Marketing U.S. LLC.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080625-0041.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1126-000; ER08-1127-000; ER08-1128-000; ER08-
1129-000; ER08-1130-000; ER08-1131-000; ER08-1132-000; ER08-1133-000;
ER08-1134-000; ER08-1135-000; ER08-1136-000; ER08-1137-000; ER08-1138-
000; ER08-1139-000; ER07-100-001.
    Applicants: Georgia-Pacific Brewton LLC; GP Big Island, LLC;
Brunswick Cellulose, Inc.; Georgia-Pacific Cedar Springs LLC; Georgia-
Pacific Consumer Operations LLC; Georgia-Pacific Con Ops LLC Port
Hudson; Georgia-Pacific Con Prod LP Green Bay W; Georgia-Pacific
Consumer Products LP Mus; Georgia-Pacific Cons Prods LP Naheola;
Georgia-Pacific Cons Prods LP Savannah; Georgia-Pacific LLC Crosset;
Georgia-Pacific Monticello LLC; Georgia-Pacific Toledo LLC; Leaf River
Cellulose, LLC; Koch Supply & Trading, LP.
    Description: Georgia-Pacific Brewton LLC et al requests approval of
joint market-based rate tariff for fourteen separate qualifying
cogeneration facilities that have not sold wholesale electricity in
jurisdictional markets etc and also filed a reports that they had no
sales or purchases of wholesale electric energy or of natural gas to
publishers of price indices.
    Filed Date: 06/20/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080624-0036; 20080624-0145.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 11, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1144-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits revisions to the
Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of PJM Interconnection, LLC
(Operating Agreement or OA) pursuant to Section 205 of the Federal
Power Act etc.
    Filed Date: 06/20/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080624-0022.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 11, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1145-000.
    Applicants: Bangor Hydro-Electric Company.
    Description: Bangor Hydro-Electric Company submits an informational
filing showing the implementation of their formula rate for the charges
that became effective on 6/1/08.
    Filed Date: 06/20/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080624-0034.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 11, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1147-000.
    Applicants: SG Energy LLC.
    Description: SG Energy, LLV submits FERc Electric Tariff, Original
Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 06/20/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080624-0032.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 11, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1148-000.
    Applicants: Citadel Energy Investments Ltd.
    Description: Citadel Energy Investments Ltd submits a Notice of
Cancellation of Rate Schedule 1.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080624-0031.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1149-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc submits Petition for Approval of
Settlement Agreement.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080624-0035.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1150-000.
    Applicants: The American Electric Power Service Corp.
    Description: AEP Operating Companies submits a second revision to
the Interconnection and Local Delivery Service Agreement with the
Village of Greenwich.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080624-0030.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1151-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Notification of tariff implementation error and
request for a limited tariff waiver of New York Independent System
Operator, Inc.
    Filed Date: 06/20/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080624-0029.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 11, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1152-000.
    Applicants: Potomac Electric Power Company.
    Description: Potomac Electric Power Company submits an unexecuted
form of an interconnection agreement, attached as Attachment A hereto,
that Pepco and Panda-Brandywine, LP will enter into subject to the
satisfaction etc.
    Filed Date: 06/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080624-0024.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1159-000.
    Applicants: Tampa Electric Company.
    Description: Tampa Electric Co submits an amendment to the
Transmission Service Agreement with Auburndale Power Partners, LP.
    Filed Date: 06/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080625-0047.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, July 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1160-000.
    Applicants: Sconza Candy Company.

    Description: Sconza Candy Company submits Notice of Succession
Change of ownership.
    Filed Date: 06/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080625-5014.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 16, 2008.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following foreign
utility company status filings:
    Docket Numbers: FC08-7-000; FC08-8-000; FC08-9-000.
    Applicants: P.P.C. Limited; Atlantic Equipment & Power (Turks and
Ca; Belize Electric Company Limited.
    Description: Notification of Self-Certification of Foreign Utility
Company Status of P.P.C. Limited, et al. under FC08-7, et al.
    Filed Date: 06/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080625-5041.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 16, 2008.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-14991 Filed 7-1-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 76 (Monday, April 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22178-22181]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08949]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket No. FRA-2014-0011-N-7]

Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment
Request

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and its
implementing regulations, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
hereby announces that it is seeking renewal of the following currently
approved information collection activities. Before submitting the
information collection requests (ICRs) below for clearance by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), FRA is soliciting public comment
on specific aspects of the activities identified below.

DATES: Comments must be received no later than June 20, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on any or all of the following
proposed activities by mail to either: Mr. Robert Brogan, Office of
Safety, Planning and Evaluation Division, RRS-21, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Mail Stop 17, Washington, DC
20590, or Ms. Kimberly Toone, Office of Information Technology, RAD-20,
Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Mail Stop
35, Washington, DC 20590. Commenters requesting FRA to acknowledge
receipt of their respective comments must include a self-addressed
stamped postcard stating, ``Comments on OMB control number --------.''
Alternatively, comments may be transmitted via facsimile to (202) 493-
6216 or<PHONE_NUMBER>, or via email to Mr. Brogan at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or to Ms. Toone at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please
refer to the assigned OMB control number in any correspondence
submitted. FRA will summarize comments received in response to this
notice in a subsequent notice and include them in its information
collection submission to OMB for approval.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Brogan, Office of Planning
and Evaluation Division, RRS-21, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200
New Jersey Ave, SE., Mail Stop 17, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone:
(202) 493-6292) or Ms. Kimberly Toone, Office of Information
Technology, RAD-20, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Ave, SE., Mail Stop 35, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 493-
6132). (These telephone numbers are not toll-free.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA),
Public Law 104-13, sec. 2, 109 Stat. 163 (1995) (codified as revised at
44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR part
1320, require Federal agencies to provide 60-days notice to the public
for comment on information collection activities before seeking
approval for reinstatement or renewal by OMB. 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A);
5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), 1320.10(e)(1), 1320.12(a). Specifically, FRA
invites interested respondents to comment on the following summary of
proposed information collection

activities regarding (i) whether the information collection activities
are necessary for FRA to properly execute its functions, including
whether the activities will have practical utility; (ii) the accuracy
of FRA's estimates of the burden of the information collection
activities, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used to determine the estimates; (iii) ways for FRA to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information being collected; and
(iv) ways for FRA to minimize the burden of information collection
activities on the public by automated, electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology (e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses). See
44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)(i)-(iv); 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1)(i)-(iv). FRA
believes that soliciting public comment will promote its efforts to
reduce the administrative and paperwork burdens associated with the
collection of information mandated by Federal regulations. In summary,
FRA reasons that comments received will advance three objectives: (i)
Reduce reporting burdens; (ii) ensure that it organizes information
collection requirements in a ``user friendly'' format to improve the
use of such information; and (iii) accurately assess the resources
expended to retrieve and produce information requested. See 44 U.S.C.
3501.
    Below is a brief summary of currently approved information
collection activities that FRA will submit for clearance by OMB as
required under the PRA:
    Title: Railroad Operating Rules.
    OMB Control Number: 2130-0035.
    Abstract: The collection of information is due to the railroad
operating rules set forth in 49 CFR part 217 which require Class I and
Class II railroads to file with FRA copies of their operating rules,
timetables, and timetable special instructions, and subsequent
amendments thereto. Class III railroads are required to retain copies
of these documents at their systems headquarters. Also, 49 CFR
220.21(b) prescribes the collection of information which requires
railroads to retain one copy of their current operating rules with
respect to radio communications and one copy of each subsequent
amendment thereto. These documents must be made available to FRA upon
request. Through these rules, FRA learns the condition of operating
rules and practices with respect to trains and instructions provided by
the railroad to their employees in operating practices.
    Form Number(s): N/A.
    Affected Public: Businesses.
    Respondent Universe: 720 railroads.
    Frequency of Submission: On occasion.
    Reporting Burden:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Total annual      Average time per    Total annual
            CFR section             Respondent universe       responses            response        burden hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
217.7--Copy--FRA--Operating rules,  2 new railroads....  2 submissions......  1 hour............               2
 timetables, Class I & II RRs.
    --Amendments..................  55 railroads.......  165 amendments.....  20 minutes........              55
    --Copy of operating rules/      5 new railroads....  5 submissions......  55 minutes........               5
     timetables, etc. by Class III.
    --Amendments by Class III       687 railroads......  2,061 amendments...  15 minutes........             515
     Railroads.
217.9--RR and RR Testing Officer    720 railroads......  4,732 field trained  8 hours...........          37,856
 Qualification.                                           officers/training
                                                          sessions.
    --Records of Qualification....  720 railroads......  4,732 records......  2 minutes.........  ..............
    --Written Prog. of Operational  5 new railroads....  5 programs.........  9.92 hours........             158
     Tests.
    --Records of Operational Tests/ 720 railroads......  9,188,700 records..  5 minutes.........              50
     Inspections.
    --Amendments..................  55 railroads.......  165 amendments.....  1.92 hours........         765,725
    --Quarterly Review of Accident/ 720 railroads......  196 reviews........  1 hour............             317
     Incident Data/Prior Op. Tests/                                                                          196
     Insp..
    --Designated Officers &         720 railroads......  61 designations +    5 seconds + 1 hour  ..............
     Conduct of 6 Mo. Rev..                               132 reviews.
    --Designated Officers &         Amtrak + 23          24 designations +    5 seconds + 1 hour             132
     Conduct of Six Month Review     railroads.           48 reviews.                                         48
     by Passenger/Commuter
     Railroads.
    --Records of Periodic Reviews.  720 railroads......  752 review records.  1 minute..........  ..............
    --Annual Summary on             61 railroads.......  61 summary records.  61 minutes........              13
     Operational Tests/Insp..
    --FRA Disapproval of RR         720 railroads......  10 supporting        1 hour............              62
     Program of Operational Tests/                        documents.                                          10
     Insp. & Response by RR.
    --Amended Prog. Docs..........  720 railroads......  10 amended           30 minutes........  ..............
                                                          documents.
271.11--Instruction of Program      720 railroads......  130,000 instr.       8 hours...........       1,040,000
 Employees.                                               employees.
    --New RR & Copy of Program of   5 new railroads....  5 Programs.........  8 hours...........              40
     Op. Tests.
    --Amendments to Op. Rules       720 railroads......  220 amendments.....  55 minutes........             202
     Instr. Program.
218.95--Instruction, Training,      720 railroads......  98,000 records.....  5 minutes.........           8,167
 Examination--Records.
    --Response to FRA Disapproval   720 railroads......  25 written/oral      1 hour............              25
     of Program.                                          submissions.
    --Programs Needing Amendment..  720 railroads......  10 amended programs  30 minutes........               5
218.97--Written Procedures on Good  720 railroads......  41 written           2 hours...........              82
 Faith Challenges by Employees Re:                        procedures.
 Actions.
    --Employee Copy of Written      720 railroads......  4,000 copies.......  6 minutes.........             400
     Procedures.
    --Employee Copy of Amended      720 railroads......  125,000 copies.....  3 minutes.........           6,250
     Procedures.
    --Good Faith Challenges by RR   98,000 RR Employees  15 challenges......  10 minutes........               3
     Employees.
    --RR Responses to Empl.         720 railroads......  5 immediate reviews  15 minutes........               1
     Challenge.
    --Immediate Review of Employee  720 railroads......  5 immediate reviews  15 minutes........               1
     Challenge.
    --RR Officer Explanation of     720 railroads......  5 explanations.....  1 minutes.........             .08
     Federal Law Protection
     Against Retaliation.
    --Documented Protest by RR      720 railroads......  10 written protests  15 minutes........               3
     Employee.
    --Copies of Protests..........  720 railroads......  10 protest copies..  1 minute..........  ..............
    --Further Reviews.............  720 railroads......  3 further reviews..  15 minutes........              17
    --Written Verification--        720 railroads......  10 verification      10 minutes........               1
     Decision to Employee.                                decisions.                                           2

    --Copy of Written Procedures    720 railroads......  773 copies of        5 minutes.........              64
     at RR Hdtrs..                                        procedures.
    --Copy of Verification          720 railroads......  20 verification      5 minutes.........               2
     Decision at RR Headquarters &                        decision.
     Division Headquarters.
218.99--Shoving or Pushing          ...................  ...................  ..................  ..............
 Movements.
    --Operating Rule Modifications  720 railroads......  41 rule              1 hour............              41
                                                          modifications.
    --Locomotive Engineer Job       100,000 RR           60,000 job           1 minute..........           1,000
     Briefing Before Movement.       Employees.           briefings.
    --Point Protection              100,000 RR           87,600,000           1 minute + 1             2,920,000
     Determinations & Signals/       Employees.           determinations +     minute.
     Instructions to Control                              87,600,000 signals/
     Movements.                                           instructions.
    --Remote Control Movements--    100,000 RR           876,000              1 minute..........          14,600
     Verbal Confirmation.            Employees.           confirmations.
    --Remote Control                100,000 RR           876,000              1 minute..........          14,600
     Determinations That Zone Is     Employees.           determinations.
     Not Jointly Occupied/Track
     Clear.
    --Dispatcher Authorized Train   6,000 RR             30,000 movements...  1 minute..........             500
     Movements.                      Dispatchers.
218.101--Operating Rule Re:         720 railroads......  41 amended op.       30 minutes........        21 hours
 Leaving Rolling & On-Track MOW                           rules.
 Equipment in the Clear.
218.103--Hand-Operated Switches--   720 railroads......  41 modified          1 hour............              41
 RR Operating Rule That Complies w/                       operating rules.
 Sec.   218.103.
    --Specification of Minimum Job  720 railroads......  55 modified op.      30 minutes........              28
     Briefing Requirements.                               rules.
    --Employee Operating or         720 railroads......  1,125,000 job        1 minute..........          18,750
     Verifying Position of Hand-                          briefings.
     operated Switches: Job
     Briefings.
218.105--Additional Requirements    720 railroads......  60,000 job           1 minute..........           1,000
 for Hand Operated Main Track                             briefings.
 Switches--Job Briefing.
    --Roadway Worker Report on      720 railroads......  100,000 empl.        1 minute + 1                 3,334
     Position of Switches to                              reports + 100,000    minute.
     Roadway Worker in Charge                             conveyances.
     (RWIC) or Designated Employee
     Conveying Information to RWIC.
    --Dispatcher Acknowledgment of  720 railroads......  60,000               30 seconds + 5                 583
     Switch Position and Employee                         acknowledgment +     seconds.
     Confirmation to Train                                60,000
     Dispatcher.                                          confirmations.
218.109--Hand Operated Fixed        720 railroads......  562,500 hours......  30 seconds........           4,688
 Derails: Job Briefings.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Total Estimated Responses: 188,669,706.
    Total Estimated Annual Burden: 4,839,583 hours.
    Status: Extension of a Currently Approved Collection.
    Title: Reflectorization of Freight Rolling Stock.
    OMB Control Number: 2130-0566.
    Abstract: The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) issued this
regulation to mandate the reflectorization of freight rolling stock
(freight cars and locomotives) to enhance the visibility of trains in
order to reduce the number and severity of accidents at highway-rail
grade crossings in which train visibility acted as a contributing
factor. The information collected is used by FRA to ensure that
railroads/car owners follow the schedule established by the regulation
for placing retro-reflective material on the sides of freight rolling
stock (freight cars and locomotives) in order to improve the visibility
of trains. The information is also used by FRA to confirm that
railroads/car owners meet the prescribed standards for the application,
inspection, and maintenance of the required retro-reflective material.
    Form Number(s): FRA F 6180.113.
    Affected Public: Businesses.
    Respondent Universe: 685 railroads and 4 Locomotive Manufacturers.
    Frequency of Submission: On occasion.
    Reporting Burden:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Total annual      Average time per    Total annual
            CFR section             Respondent universe       responses            response        burden hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
224.7--Waivers....................  753 Railroads/Car    15 petitions.......  1 hour............              15
                                     Owners.
224.15--Special Approval            3 Manufacturers....  12 petitions.......  40 hours..........             480
 Procedures--Petitions.
    --Public Comment on Petitions.  3 Manufacturers/     3 comment..........  1 hour............               3
                                     Railroads.
224.107--Implementation Schedule:   753 Railroads/Car    200 reports/forms..  15 minutes........              50
 Freight Cars.                       Owners.
    --Existing Freight Cars with    753 Railroads/Car    200 reports/forms..  20 hours..........           4,000
     Retroreflective Sheeting.       Owners.
    --Updated Reflectorization      753 Railroads/Car    5 failure reports..  2 hours...........              10
     Implementation Plans: Failure   Owners.
     Rpt..
    II. Existing Cars w/            753 Railroads/Car    172 reports/forms..  20 hours..........           3,440
     Retroreflective Sheeting.       Owners.
    (b Existing Locomotives         753 Railroads/Car    35 reports/forms...  15 minutes........               9
     without Retroreflective         Owners.
     sheeting.
    --Updated Reflectorization      753 Railroads/Car    35 reports/forms...  3 hours...........             105
     Compliance Reports.             Owners.

    --Failure reports after         753 Railroads/Car    1 failure report...  2 hours...........               2
     initial 24 mo..                 Owners.
    II. Existing Locomotives with   753 Railroads/Car    150 reports/forms..  4 hours...........             600
     Retroreflective Sheeting--      Owners.
     Reports of Compliance.
224.109--Inspection, Repair,        AAR + 300 Car Shops  272,600 Notices....  2 minutes.........           9,090
 Replacement--Freight Cars.
    --Locomotives: Records of       22,045 Locomotives.  4,809 records......  3 minutes.........             240
     Restrictions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Total Responses: 278,237.
    Total Estimated Total Annual Burden: 18,044 hours.
    Status: Extension of a Currently Approved Collection.
    Title: Track Safety Standards: Concrete Crossties.
    OMB Control Number: 2130-0592.
    Abstract: On April 1, 2011, FRA amended the Federal Track Safety
Standards to promote the safety of railroad operations over track
constructed with concrete crossties. In particular, FRA mandated
specific requirements for effective concrete crossties, for rail
fastening systems connected to concrete crossties, and for automated
inspections of track constructed with concrete crossties. The
information collected under Sec.  213.234 is used by FRA to ensure that
automated track inspections of track constructed with concrete
crossties are carried out as specified in this section to supplement
visual inspections by Class I and Class II railroads, intercity
passenger railroads, and commuter railroads or small government
jurisdictions that serve populations greater than 50,000.
    Form Number(s): N/A.
    Affected Public: Businesses.
    Respondent Universe: 18 railroads.
    Frequency of Submission: On occasion.
    Reporting Burden:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Total annual      Average time per    Total annual
            CFR section             Respondent universe       responses            response        burden hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
213.234--Automated Inspection of    18 Railroads.......  150 reports........  8 hours...........           1,200
 Track Constructed with Concrete
 Crossties: Exception Reports
 Listing All Exception to Sec.
 213.109(d)(4).
    -- Copies of Exception Report   18 Railroads.......  150 report copies..  12 minutes........              30
     Provided to Designated Person
     under Sec.   213.234(e)(1).
    --Field Verification of         18 Railroads.......  150 verification...  2 hours...........             300
     Exception Reports.
    --Records of Inspection Data..  18 Railroads.......  150 records........  30 minutes........              75
    --Institution of Procedures by  18 Railroads.......  18 procedures......  4 hours...........              72
     Track Owner to Maintain
     Integrity of Track Data
     Collected by the Measurement
     System.
    --Training by Track Owner:      18 Railroads.......  2,000 trained        8 hours...........          16,000
     Annual Training in Handing                           employees.
     Rail Seat Deterioration
     Exceptions to All Persons
     Designated Fully Qualified
     under Sec.   213.7.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Total Responses: 2,618.
    Total Estimated Total Annual Burden: 17,677 hours.
    Status: Extension of a Currently Approved Collection.
    Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and 5 CFR 1320.5(b),
1320.8(b)(3)(vi), FRA informs all interested parties that it may not
conduct or sponsor, and a respondent is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.

    Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on 15 April 2014.
Rebecca Pennington,
Chief Financial Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-08949 Filed 4-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US

11/07/2007 05:01 PM

To

<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Tom Walton/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Darryl Weatherhead/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Charles Fulcher/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

Materials for briefing by EPA/OAR/OAQPS for OMB on Extrapolated Costs at 3:00 tomorrow 11/8/2007

Rob,

    Thank you for the list of questions from our previous meeting.  I am adding them to my list and will try to get answers to you this week.  Attached below are the materials for our meeting tomorrow 11/8 at 3:00 on Extrapolated Costs.  I look forward to talking with you then and if you need any further information, please let me know.

Thanks,

Janet

_______________________________________

Janet F. Cakir, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Air Benefits Cost Group

109 TW Alexander Dr., (C439-02)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Tel:<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 6, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54353-54355]
[FR Doc No: 2022-19117]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0592; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-01023-T;
Amendment 39-22168; AD 2022-18-17]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; MHI RJ Aviation ULC (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain MHI RJ Aviation ULC Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900)
airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of a manufacturing error
that can create dents on the lower wing plank, close to the flap arm
locations at certain wing stations; as a result, cracks could develop
and weaken the structural integrity of the wings before being detected
by any existing required inspections. This AD requires an inspection
for damage (including dents, cracks, discoloration, gouges, scratches,
or other surface damage) of the lower wing plank in the flap arm areas
at certain wing stations, and repair if necessary. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective October 11, 2022.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of October 11,
2022.

ADDRESSES:
    AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2022-0592; or in person at Docket Operations between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this final rule, the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
    Material Incorporated by Reference:
     For service information identified in this final rule,
contact MHI RJ Aviation Group, Customer Response Center, 3655 Ave. des
Grandes-Tourelles, Suite 110, Boisbriand, Qu[eacute]bec J7H 0E2 Canada;
North America toll-free telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or direct-dial telephone
450-990-7272; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email mhirj.com">[email protected]mhirj.com; website
mhirj.com.
     You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2022-0592.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deep Gaurav, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Propulsion Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain MHI RJ Aviation
ULC Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on June 2, 2022 (87 FR 33454). The
NPRM was prompted by AD CF-2021-31, dated September 14, 2021, issued by
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada (referred to after this as the MCAI). The MCAI states that a
manufacturing error may have resulted in dents on the lower wing plank,
close to the five flap arm locations at wing station (WS) 54.55, WS
128.00, WS 179.00, WS 220.00, and WS 264.00. These dents could lead to
cracks that could weaken the structural integrity of the wings before
being detected by any existing required inspection.
    In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require an inspection for damage
(including dents, cracks, discoloration, gouges, scratches, or other
surface damage) of the lower wing plank in the flap arm areas at
certain wing stations, and repair if necessary. The FAA is issuing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2022-0592.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, it
has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA reviewed the relevant data and determined
that air safety requires adopting this AD as proposed. Accordingly, the
FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on this product.
Except for minor editorial changes, this AD is adopted as proposed in
the NPRM. None of the changes will increase the economic burden on any
operator.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed MHI RJ Aviation Service Bulletin 670BA-57-029,
dated February 2, 2021. This service information specifies procedures
for, among other actions, doing a detailed visual inspection for damage
(including dents, cracks, discoloration, gouges, scratches, or other
surface damage) of the outer aft lower skin at WS 54.55, WS 128.00, WS
179.00, WS 220.00, and WS 264.00, and repair. This service information
is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to
it through their normal course of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 14 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 work-hours x $85 per hour = $170...........................              $0             $170           $2,380
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has received no definitive data on which to base the cost
estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2022-18-17 MHI RJ Aviation ULC (Type Certificate Previously Held by
Bombardier, Inc.): Amendment 39-22168; Docket No. FAA-2022-0592;
Project Identifier MCAI-2021-01023-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective October 11, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to MHI RJ Aviation ULC (type certificate
previously held by Bombardier, Inc.) Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet
Series 900) airplanes, certificated in any category, having serial
number 15462 through 15475 inclusive.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report of a manufacturing error that
can create dents on the lower wing plank, close to the flap arm
locations at certain wing stations; as a result, cracks could
develop and weaken the structural integrity of the wings before
being detected by any existing required inspections. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address dents, cracks, and other damage, that, if
not detected and corrected, could lead to reduced structural
integrity of the wings.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspection and Corrective Action

    Prior to the accumulation of 8,800 total flight hours or within
30 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later,
perform a detailed visual inspection for damage (including dents,
cracks, discoloration, gouges, scratches, or other surface damage)
of the outer aft lower skin at wing stations (WS) 54.55, WS 128.00,
WS 179.00, WS 220.00, and WS 264.00 in accordance with paragraph B.,
``Procedure,'' of the Accomplishment Instructions of MHI RJ Aviation
Service Bulletin 670BA-57-029, dated February 2, 2021. Do all
applicable corrective actions before further flight. If any damage
is found during the inspection, before further flight, repair using
a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO Branch, FAA; or
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or MHI RJ Aviation ULC's
TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the
approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.

(h) No Reporting Requirement

    Although MHI RJ Aviation Service Bulletin 670BA-57-029, dated
February 2, 2021, specifies to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that requirement.

(i) Special Flight Permit

    Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199 to operate the airplane to a location where the
inspection can be done, provided the flight is a non-revenue flight.

(j) Other FAA Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If
sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the responsible Flight
Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or TCCA; or MHI RJ Aviation ULC's TCCA DAO. If approved
by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.

(k) Additional Information

    (1) Refer to TCCA AD CF-2021-31, dated September 14, 2021, for
related information. This TCCA AD may be found in the AD docket at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2022-0592.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Deep Gaurav,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Section, FAA, New York
ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone

516-228-7300; email [email protected].

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) MHI RJ Aviation Service Bulletin 670BA-57-029, dated
February 2, 2021.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact MHI
RJ Aviation Group, Customer Response Center, 3655 Ave. des Grandes-
Tourelles, Suite 110, Boisbriand, Qu[eacute]bec J7H 0E2 Canada;
North America toll-free telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or direct-dial
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email mhirj.com">[email protected]mhirj.com;
website mhirj.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email [email protected], or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on August 29, 2022.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-19117 Filed 9-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 CONTACT REPORT

Person Calling:	Keith Barnett

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

OAQPS/ESD/OCG

919-541-5605

Person Called:	Hector Ybanez

Holcim Cement

Date of Contact:	May 27, 2009

Contact Summary:

Hector called with some
d瑡敲畱獥獴ഺ䤍䥓⁓畯灴瑵猠敨瑥൳䐍捯浵湥慴楴
湯漠潨⁷敷猠瑥甠⁰桴䅍呃映潬牯഍潃祰漠佔⁃
慤慴映潲ㄱ‴敲灳湯敳൳䌍灯⁹景吠䍈搠瑡ൡ䐍楡祬
䠠浥獩楳湯⁳潦⁲污楫湬⹳഍名敨敲搠瑡敷敲瀠
潲楶敤瑡愠氠瑡牥搠瑡⹥̍഍ഄ̍഍ഄ嬍䍛湯慴瑣㈺
崶൝†††慐敧 ഍

________________________________________________________________________
______

Confirmation: I confirm that the information above is __ correct ___
correct with the changes noted above.

Signature: ___________________________________