[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 219 (Monday, November 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70467-70468]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29223]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4040-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]

Puerto Rico; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-4040-DR), dated
October 18, 2011, and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: October 18, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated October 18, 2011, the President issued a major disaster
declaration under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the
``Stafford Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico resulting from Tropical Storm
Mar[iacute]a during the period of September 8-14, 2011, is of
sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a major disaster
declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''). Therefore, I declare that such a major disaster exists in
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Individual Assistance in the
designated areas and Hazard Mitigation throughout the Commonwealth.
Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance is
supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Hazard Mitigation and Other Needs Assistance will be limited to 75
percent of the total eligible costs.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The time period prescribed for the implementation of section
310(a), Priority to Certain Applications for Public Facility and Public
Housing Assistance, 42 U.S.C. 5153, shall be for a period not to exceed
six months after the date of this declaration.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, Justo Hern[aacute]ndez, of FEMA is
appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major
disaster.
    The following areas of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico have been
designated as adversely affected by this major disaster:

    The municipalities of Juana D[iacute]az, Naguabo, and Yabucoa
for Individual Assistance.
    All municipalities within the Commomwealth of Puerto Rico are
eligible to apply for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant
Program.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-29223 Filed 11-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D. C. 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES MEMORANDUM Date: 7/ 22/ 04 Subject: Dimethipin. Residue Chemistry Considerations for Reregistration Eligibility Decision. Case No. 3063.

DP Barcode: D293580 PC Codes: 118901 40 CFR:. § 180.406 From: Danette Drew, Chemist Reregistration Branch 3 Health Effects Division ( 7509C)

Through: Catherine Eiden, Branch Chief Reregistration Branch 3 Health Effects Division ( 7509C)

To: Susan Stanton Reregistration Branch 3 Health Effects Division ( 7509C)

Attached is the Residue Chemistry Chapter for the dimethipin Reregistration Eligibility Decision. The document was originally prepared by Dynamac Corp.( 9/ 4/ 03; Germantown, MD) and has been modified to reflect current HED policies. 2 Executive Summary Dimethipin [ 2,3 dihydro 5,6 dimethyl 1,4 dithiin 1,1,4,4 tetraoxide] is a plant growth regulator/ dessicant registered for use as a preharvest cotton defoliant. Dimethipin products are registered in the U. S. to Crompton Manufacturing Company, Inc. ( parent company to Uniroyal Chemical Company, Inc.) under the trade name HARVADE ® . Currently, the 2, 3.2, and 4.9 lb/ gal flowable concentrate formulations of dimethipin are registered for use on cotton. The products are typically applied as postemergence broadcast applications using ground or aerial equipment.

Dimethipin is a FIFRA List C pesticide. The Health Effects Division completed the Dimethipin Phase 4 Review on 9/ 26/ 91. A Dimethipin Data Call In ( DCI) Notice was subsequently issued 12/ 30/ 91. Several data submissions have been received and evaluated since the Phase 4 Review. The information contained in this document outlines the Residue Chemistry Science Assessments with respect to the reregistration of dimethipin.

The nature of the residue in plants ( cotton) and livestock is adequately understood based on metabolism studies with cotton, goats, and hens. The residue of concern for tolerance enforcement is dimethipin per se for both plant and livestock commodities. The residue of concern for risk assessment is dimethipin per se for plant commodities and livestock commodities except liver. The residues of concern for risk assessment for the liver of cattle, goats, hogs and sheep are dimethipin plus acetyl dithiane tetraoxide ( Dimethipin Team Review of Metabolism Information, 3/ 11/ 04 and 5/ 17/ 04 meetings ).

Tolerances are established under 40 CFR § 180.406 ( a) for residues of dimethipin ( 2,3 dihydro 5,6 dimethyl 1,4 dithiin 1,1,4,4 tetraoxide; CAS Reg. No. 55290 64 7) per se in/ on cotton, undelinted seed at 0.5 ppm, cotton hulls at 0.7 ppm, and the fat, meat, and meat byproducts of cattle, goats, hogs, horses, and sheep, each at 0.02 ppm. There are no tolerance established for dimethipin residues in poultry tissues or eggs as the Agency has concluded that there is no reasonable expectation of finite residues ( 40 CFR § 180.6( a)( 3)) of dimethipin in poultry commodities based on the current registered uses.

Tolerances for dimethipin have been reassessed. The tolerance level for undelinted cottonseed should remain at the established level ( 0.5 ppm). The established tolerance for cotton hulls should be revoked as processing studies indicate that dimethipin residues do not concentrate in cotton hulls.

Although feeding study data, reflecting exaggerated dosing levels, indicate that there are no expectation of finite residues in the fat, meat, or meat byproducts of cattle, goat, horses, hogs or sheep, HED recommends that the tolerances for dimethipin in livestock meat and meat byproducts not be revoked in order to harmonize with the established Codex MRLs. The U. S. tolerances for livestock meat and meat byproducts and Codex MRLs for mammalian meat and edible offal are established at 0.02 ppm, which is at or about the limit of quantitation.

The U. S. tolerances for dimethipin in the fat of cattle, goat, horses, hogs and sheep should be revoked as there is no expectation of finite residues in these commodities and there are no Codex MRLs established. 3 There is no U. S. tolerance for dimethipin in milk. A tolerance for milk is not required as there is no expectation of finite residues of dimethipin in milk.

For enforcement of tolerances for residues of dimethipin, PAM Vol. II lists two methods, Method I for cottonseed and Method II for livestock tissues and eggs. The stated detection limits are 0.1 ppm for cottonseed and 0.02 ppm for livestock commodities.

Residue Chemistry Deficiencies " 860.1500: Data must be submitted depicting dimethipin residues in cotton gin byproducts which include burrs, leaves, stem, lint, immature seeds and sand ( dirt) obtained from ginning cotton.

" 860.1850: To demonstrate the storage stability of the samples used in the supplemental confined rotational crop submission, the registrant must submit additional data/ information comparing the chromatographic profiles of the stored samples with those of the original analyses ( see D219060 and D223855, DERs 43768201, 43768202, and 43931301).

" 860.1900: Additional storage stability data are required to support the limited field rotational crop studies ( see D225417, DERs 43979102 and 43979101). HED notes that crop field trial data for cotton gin byproducts and extensive field rotational crop studies are required; storage stability data to support those studies will be required unless samples are analyzed within one month of collection.

" 860.1900: The available limited rotational crop studies indicate the potential for dimethipin residues in certain rotated crops at the established plantback interval ( 6 months). Extensive field rotational crop studies must be submitted for all crops, except leafy vegetables, for which the registrant wishes to allow a 6 month plantback interval. 4 S S CH 3 CH 3 O O O O Background The PC Code and nomenclature of dimethipin are listed below in Table 1 and the physicochemical properties of dimethipin are listed in Table 2.

Table 1. Dimethipin Nomenclature Chemical structure Common name Dimethipin Molecular Formula C6H10O4S2 Molecular Weight 210.26 IUPAC name 2,3 dihydro 5,6 dimethyl 1,4 dithiine 1,1,4,4 tetraoxide CAS name 2,3 dihydro 5,6 dimethyl 1,4 dithiin 1,1,4,4 tetraoxide CAS # 55290 64 7 PC Code 118901 Current Food/ Feed Site Registration Cotton Table 2. Physicochemical Properties of Dimethipin Parameter Value Reference Melting point/ range 162 167

C MRID 41655601 pH 4.52 at 30

C ( 1% w: v solution in 50% aqueous dioxane due to insolubility in water) MRID 41655604 Density 1.5935 g/ cm3 at 23

C MRID 41655602 Water solubility 0.46 g/ 100 mL at 25

C MRIDs 41967004, 41967005 Solvent solubility At 25

C: acetone 0.097 g/ mL 1 octanol 79.356 mg/ 100 mL hexane 1.664 mg/ 100 mL methanol 0.05 g/ 100 mL xylene 0.57 g/ 100 mL chloroform 7.92 g/ 100 mL MRIDs 41967004, 41967005 Vapor pressure < 3.81 x 10 7 mm Hg at 24

C MRID 43898701 Dissociation constant, pKa 10.88 +/ 0.39 at 25

C MRID 41655603 Octanol/ water partition coefficient, Log( KOW) 0.66 at 24

C MRID 42282702 UV/ visible absorption spectrum ( not available) Data outstanding 5 RESIDUE CHARACTERIZATION General Discussion on Residue Chemistry of Dimethipin 860.1200 Directions for Use Product List An OPPIN search conducted 6/ 30/ 04 identified three dimethipin end use products ( EPs) registered to Crompton Manufacturing Company, Inc. These EPs, including the associated Special Local Need ( SLN) registration under FIFRA Section 24 ( c), are listed below.

Table 3. Dimethipin End use Products ( EPs) with Food/ Feed Uses Registered to Crompton Manufacturing Company, Inc.

EPA Reg. No. Formulation Product Name 400 155 4.9 lb/ gal FlC1 Harvade ®  5F Harvest Growth Regulant For Cotton 400 398 2 lb/ gal FlC Harvade ®  25F Harvest Growth Regulant For Cotton 400 505 3.2 lb/ gal FlC2 Leafless ® Harvest Growth Regulant for Cotton 1 Including SLN WA980008. 2 This product also contains thidiazuron. This product was listed as an emulsifiable concentrate in OPPIN.

Use Pattern Table A comprehensive summary of the registered food/ feed use patterns of dimethipin, as prepared by BEAD, is presented in Appendix 1. A tabular summary of the residue chemistry science assessments for reregistration of dimethipin is presented in Table 5. The conclusions listed in Table 5 regarding the reregistration eligibility of dimethipin food/ feed uses are based on the use patterns to be supported by the basic producer, Crompton Manufacturing Company, Inc.

There is one SLN registration for dimethipin, WA980008. Under WA980008, dimethipin is registered for use on nonbearing apple nursery stock. Because the label prohibits use on trees that will bear fruit for harvest within on year of application, the use is considered a nonfood use.

860.1300 Nature of the Residue  Plants The nature of the residue in cotton is understood; the residue of concern for tolerance enforcement and risk assessment is the parent, dimethipin per se ( Dimethipin Team Review of Metabolism Information, 3/ 11/ 04 and 5/ 17/ 04 meetings).

A summary of a cotton metabolism study was submitted for Phase 4 review ( MRIDs 93089024 and 93089037); the Phase 4 Review concluded that this study was not sufficient to satisfy data requirements because results were not confirmed using a second method, and insufficient attempts were made to characterize unidentified radioactivity. 6 In a second cotton metabolism study ( MRID 43436901), greenhouse grown cotton was treated with [ 2,3 14C] dimethipin at 1.22 lb ai/ A and 3.06 lb ai/ A ( 2.2x and 5.4x the maximum seasonal rate) two weeks prior to harvest. Total radioactive residues were 97.1 ppm in foliage and 0.291 ppm in seeds from plants treated at the 2.2x rate, and 341.3 ppm in foliage and 1.42 ppm in seeds from plants treated at the 5.4x rate. Matrices from the 2.2x treated plants were subjected to extraction and characterization/ identification. Dimethipin per se was found to comprise 74% of foliage radioactivity and 80% of seed radioactivity; no additional metabolites were identified.

860.1300 Nature of the Residue  Livestock The qualitative nature of the residue in livestock is understood. The residue of concern for tolerance enforcement is dimethipin per se for livestock commodities. The residue of concern for risk assessment is dimethipin per se for livestock commodities except liver. The residues of concern for risk assessment for the liver of cattle, goats, hogs and sheep are dimethipin plus acetyl dithiane tetraoxide ( Dimethipin Team Review of Metabolism Information, 3/ 11/ 04 and 5/ 17/ 04 meetings).

Following oral administration of [ 2,3 14C] dimethipin to lactating goats for 5 days at 3.066, 1010.8, and 1290.0 ppm (

0.54x, 177x, and 226x the maximum theoretical dietary burden), the TRR were 0.005 0.006 ppm in milk, 0.27 ppm in liver, 0.15 ppm in kidney, 0.002 ppm in muscle, and 0.001 ppm in fat from the goat dosed at 3.066 ppm, 0.68 1.20 ppm in milk, 78.5 ppm in liver, 28.4 ppm in kidney, 0.64 ppm in muscle, and 0.32 ppm in fat from the goat dosed at 1010.8 ppm, and 3.13 4.26 ppm in milk, 45.0 ppm in liver, 55.2 ppm in kidney, 2.04 ppm in muscle, and 0.99 ppm in fat from the goat dosed at 1290.0 ppm.

Dimethipin was not detected in milk and tissues from the goat dosed at 3.066 ppm. In milk from this goat, dimethipin cysteine conjugate ( 34.8 52.8% TRR, 0.001 0.002 ppm) was the only residue identified. In kidney, the only metabolite identified was ethane disulfonic acid ( 75.6% TRR, 0.11 ppm). In liver, two metabolites were identified: ethane disulfonic acid ( 14.6% TRR, 0.38 ppm) and acetyl dithiane ( 16.6% TRR, 0.045 ppm). No attempts were made to characterize/ identify radioactive residues in fat and muscle because the total radioactive residues in these tissues were 0.001 and 0.002 ppm, respectively.

The parent dimethipin was also not detected in the milk and tissues of the goats dosed at higher levels. Dimethipin cysteine conjugate was also the only residue identified in milk ( 25.2 50.6% TRR, 0.22 0.55 ppm). In kidney, ethane disulfonic acid ( 27.6% TRR, 7.8 ppm) and acetyl dithiane ( 32.3% TRR, 9.2 ppm) were identified. In muscle, reduced dimethipin ( 2,3 dimethyl 1,1,4,4 tetraoxo 1,4 dithiane; 21.9% TRR, 0.140 ppm) was identified. In liver, ethane disulfonic acid ( 44.8% TRR, 20.1 ppm) was identified. Based on several fractionation and extraction procedures employed in the study, the registrant believes that majority of radioactive residues in kidney and liver were covalently bound to proteins.

Following oral administration of [ 2,3 14C] dimethipin to hens for 5 days at 2772 ppm ( 27,720x the maximum theoretical dietary burden), the TRR were 0.12 12 ppm in egg whites, 0.34 16 ppm in egg yolks, 2.4 ppm in fat, 10 ppm in thigh muscle, 10 ppm in breast muscle, 39 ppm in kidney, and 65 ppm in liver. Dimethipin per se was not detected in any poultry matrices, however reduced dimethipin was found in all matrices except thigh muscle and fat, 0.98 7.8% TRR ( 0.21 7 5.0 ppm). In all matrices except liver, the predominant metabolite was Glu Cys S Harv [ S( 2,3 dimethyl 1,1,4,4 tetraoxo 1,4 dithian yl) L cysteinyl   glutamic acid], at 19 36% TRR ( 0.48 7.5 ppm); this metabolite was found in liver at 7.4% TRR ( 4.8 ppm). The most significant liver metabolite was dimethipin cysteine conjugate ( Harv S Cys), at 21.5% TRR ( 14 ppm); this metabolite was found in all other matrices except fat, at 0.1 7.0% TRR ( 0.01 2.8 ppm). The major metabolic pathway proposed by the registrant involved the formation of thioethers of dimethipin; other minor pathways involved reduction and hydroxylation of dimethipin.

860.1340 Residue Analytical Methods Data collection methods: GC methods with flame photometric detection ( FPD) in the sulfur mode have been used for the determination of residues of dimethipin in plant commodities. These methods are the same as or modifications of the method listed in PAM Vol. II for tolerance enforcement. Brief descriptions of these methods follow.

Cottonseed, meal, and hulls are extracted with methanol: water ( 9: 1, v: v), and this extract is partitioned with hexane and chloroform. Oil is mixed with hexane which is partitioned with ACN. Chloroform extracts of cottonseed, meal, and hulls and the ACN extract of oil are evaporated to dryness and redissolved in dichloromethane. The dichloromethane extracts are concentrated and cleaned up on a GPC column eluted with dichloromethane. The eluates are evaporated to dryness, and residues are redissolved in toluene: chloroform ( 4: 1; v: v). Interfering materials are then removed by a Florisil/ alumina column cleanup in which residues of dimethipin are eluted with acetone: chloroform ( 8: 92, v: v). The eluates are evaporated to dryness, and the residues are taken up in ethyl acetate for analysis by GC/ FPD. The limit of quantitation is 0.1 ppm for all commodities.

For rotational crops, a data collection method, SOP # Meth 74, similar to the enforcement method was used. Samples are extracted with acetone/ water, partitioned into chloroform, cleaned up by gel permeation and Florisil chromatography, and analyzed by GC/ FPD ( sulfur mode). The validated LOQ is 0.02 ppm.

For livestock commodities, two data collection methods have been used: EBT SOP 271, which determines residues of dimethipin in milk, and EBT SOP 270, which determines residues of dimethipin in cattle muscle, liver, and kidney. Samples are extracted with acetonitrile ( tissues) or ethyl acetate ( milk), partitioned with petroleum ether, cleaned up by alumina/ Florisil or silica gel column chromatography, and analyzed by GC/ ECD. The validated LOQ is 0.01 ppm. The method validation recoveries indicate that GC/ ECD methods EBT SOP 270 and EBT SOP 271 are adequate for data collection purposes for the determination of residues of dimethipin in dairy cattle milk, muscle, liver, and kidney.

Two methods were used for the determination of 1,2 ethanedisulfonic acid ( EDSA) in cattle kidney, a primary method and a confirmatory method. Kidney samples are homogenized with water, proteins are precipitated with potassium ferrocyanide and zinc acetate solutions, and the extract is cleaned up then analyzed by HPLC ( primary method) or ion chromatography ( confirmatory method) with conductivity detection. The validated LOQ is 0.1 ppm for the primary method and 0.2 ppm for the confirmatory method. 8 Enforcement method: For enforcement of tolerances for residues of dimethipin, PAM Vol. II lists two methods, Method I for cottonseed and Method II for livestock tissues and eggs. The stated detection limits are 0.1 ppm for cottonseed and 0.02 ppm for livestock commodities. In Method I, samples are extracted with methanol/ water, the extract is washed with hexane to remove oil, the residues are partitioned into chloroform, the chloroform extract is evaporated to dryness and redissolved in benzene/ chloroform, and the extract is cleaned up on a Florisil/ alumina column prior to analysis using GC/ FPD. In Method II, samples are extracted with acetonitrile, the extract is washed with petroleum ether, the acetonitrile phase is evaporated to dryness and redissolved in benzene/ chloroform, and the extract is cleaned up on a Florisil/ alumina column prior to analysis by GC/ MS with selected ion monitoring.

The registrant has submitted a revised version of the enforcement method for cottonseed to include instructions for the analysis of cottonseed processed commodities, the use of toluene instead of benzene as a solvent, and a GPC cleanup step. The revised method has undergone adequate independent laboratory validation. The requested waiver of the requirement for additional method validation ( including Agency method validation) for this method has been approved. The method ( in MRID 43109801) should be forwarded to FDA for publication in PAM Vol. II as a replacement for Method I.

No radiovalidation data are available for any dimethipin enforcement method. It was concluded in the Phase 4 Review that radiovalidation data were not needed for the cottonseed method because metabolism studies indicate that dimethipin per se comprises a large portion of the residues. We note that the extraction procedures of the enforcement method for plant commodities are similar to the extraction procedures used in the cotton metabolism study.

860.1360 Multiresidue Methods The FDA PESTDATA database dated 11/ 01 ( PAM Volume I, Appendix I) indicates that dimethipin is completely recovered using Multiresidue Methods Section 302 ( Luke Method; Protocol D) but is not recovered using Section 303 ( Mills, Onley, and Gaither Method; Protocol E, nonfatty food) or Section 304 ( Mills Method; Protocol F, fatty food).

860.1380 Storage Stability The reregistration requirements for storage stability data are not fulfilled. Additional storage stability data are required to support the limited field rotational crop studies. Data must be submitted demonstrating the stability of residues of dimethipin during frozen storage for up to 8.5 months in lettuce and carrot roots and tops, 9.5 months in oat/ wheat forage, and 6 months in oat/ wheat grain and straw. We note that crop field trial data for cotton gin byproducts and extensive field rotational crop studies are required; storage stability data to support those studies will be required unless samples are analyzed within one month of collection.

The available storage stability data demonstrate that residues of dimethipin are stable under frozen storage conditions for up to one year in/ on cottonseed. Samples of cottonseed from the crop field trial studies used for tolerance reassessment were stored frozen for 4 6 months prior to analysis. 9 The available storage stability data indicate that residues of dimethipin are stable in cottonseed meal, hulls, and oil for up to 7 months of frozen storage. Cottonseed samples from the processing study were stored frozen for 4 7 months prior to analysis.

The available storage stability data indicate that residues of dimethipin are stable in dairy cattle milk, muscle, liver, and kidney for up to 2 months of frozen storage, and residues of EDSA are stable in cattle kidney for up to 178 days of frozen storage. In the feeding study, samples of milk were stored frozen for up to 43 days prior to analysis for residues of dimethipin, tissues were stored frozen for up to 22 days prior to analysis for residues of dimethipin, and kidney samples were stored frozen for up to 180 days prior to analysis for residues of EDSA.

860.1400 Water, Fish, and Irrigated Crops Dimethipin is presently not registered for direct use on water and aquatic food and feed crops; therefore, no residue chemistry data are required under these guideline topics.

860.1460 Food Handling Dimethipin is presently not registered for use in food handling establishments; therefore, no residue chemistry data are required under this guideline topic.

860.1480 Meat, Milk, Poultry, and Eggs The reregistration requirements for magnitude of the residue in meat, milk, poultry, and eggs are satisfied.

Currently, there are no registered direct animal treatments of dimethipin to livestock; however, dimethipin is registered for use on the livestock feed items of cotton. The tentative maximum theoretical dietary burdens of dimethipin to livestock are presented in Table 4. We note that these calculations are tentative because field trial data remain outstanding for cotton gin byproducts, a feed item for beef and dairy cattle. The dietary burden for cattle is calculated based on the worst case assumption that residues in cotton gin byproducts would not exceed residues in cottonseed by more than a factor of 50X. This assumption was based on the comparison of thirteen different pesticides that had separate tolerances for cottonseed and cotton gin byproducts. The tolerances on cotton gin byproducts were less than or equal to 50 times the corresponding tolerances on cottonseed.

Table 4. Calculation of Theoretical Maximum Dietary Burden of Dimethipin to Livestock.

Feedstuff % Dry Matter1 % Diet1 Reassessed Tolerance ( ppm) Dietary Contribution ( ppm) 2 Beef and Dairy Cattle Cottonseed 88 25 0.5 0.14 Cotton gin byproducts 90 20 253 5.56 TOTAL BURDEN 45 5.70 Table 4. Calculation of Theoretical Maximum Dietary Burden of Dimethipin to Livestock.

Feedstuff % Dry Matter1 % Diet1 Reassessed Tolerance ( ppm) Dietary Contribution ( ppm) 2 10 Poultry Cottonseed meal 89 20 0.5 0.1 TOTAL BURDEN 20 0.10 Swine Cottonseed meal 89 15 0.5 0.075 TOTAL BURDEN 15 0.075 1 Table 1 ( OPPTS Guideline 860.1000). 2 Contribution = ([ tolerance /% DM] X % diet) for beef and dairy cattle; Contribution = ( tolerance X % diet) for poultry and swine. 3 Residue data for cotton gin byproducts have not been submitted. The dietary burden for cattle is calculated based on the worst case assumption that residues in cotton gin byproducts would not exceed residues in cottonseed by more than a factor of 50X.

A dairy cattle feeding study with dimethipin has been conducted. Dimethipin was administered orally to 11 Holstein dairy cattle daily for 28 days. Dosing was made at 5, 16, and 55 ppm in the feed, equivalent to 0.9x, 2.8x, and 9.6x the tentative maximum theoretical dietary burden to beef and dairy cattle. Milk samples were collected twice daily. Cows were sacrificed within 24 hours of the final dose, and samples of milk, muscle, liver, and kidney were collected. Residues of dimethipin were below the limit of quantitation (< 0.01 ppm) in samples of milk ( collected on study days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28), muscle, liver, and kidney from the 55 ppm dosing group. As a result, samples of cattle commodities from the 5 and 16 ppm dosing groups were not analyzed.

The registrant did not collect or analyze samples of fat from dosed cattle in this study. Based on the available goat metabolism data, which indicated that total radioactive residues were lowest in fat ( as compared with muscle, liver, and kidney) following dosing with [ 14C] dimethipin at levels similar to and greatly exceeding those of the feeding study, HED will not require data depicting dimethipin residues in cattle fat.

The available ruminant feeding study data indicate that there is no expectation of finite residues in livestock fat, meat, or meatbyproducts.

The registrant also submitted data from analyses of kidney samples, from the above described feeding study, for residues of a dimethipin metabolite, 1,2 ethanedisulfonic acid ( EDSA). Residues of EDSA were below the LOQ (< 0.100 ppm) in samples of kidney from cattle in the 5 ppm dosing group, 0.218 0.376 ppm in kidney from the 16 ppm dosing group, and 0.315 0.663 ppm in kidney from the 55 ppm dosing group. The results for kidney samples from the 55 ppm dosing group were confirmed by a second laboratory; residues were determined to be 0.22 0.54 ppm in these samples.

Based on the results of the poultry metabolism study, the Agency has concluded that there is no reasonable expectation dimethipin residues in poultry commodities. A poultry feeding study is not required. 11 860.1500 Crop Field Trials The reregistration requirements for magnitude of the residue in plants are not fulfilled for cotton gin byproducts. Reregistration requirements are fulfilled for cottonseed.

The 9/ 26/ 91 Phase 4 Review required crop field trial studies with cotton, which have since been submitted and determined to be adequate to satisfy data requirements for cottonseed. Residues of dimethipin were < 0.10 0.215 ppm in/ on cottonseed treated with two applications of the 4.9 lb/ gal FlC formulation at 0.3125 lb ai/ A and 0.2344 lb ai/ A ( 1x the maximum registered seasonal rate); tests were conducted in AR, GA, LA, MS, TN, and TX. Additional data, from field trials conducted in CA, GA, MS, and TX, indicate that the residues of dimethipin are not likely to exceed the established tolerance of 0.5 ppm in/ on cottonseed harvested 7 days following two broadcast foliar applications of the 4.9 lb/ gal FlC formulation at 0.31 and 0.23 lb ai/ A ( 1x the maximum registered seasonal rate); dimethipin residues were < 0.10 0.260 ppm.

Data must be submitted depicting dimethipin residues in cotton gin byproducts which include burrs, leaves, stem, lint, immature seeds and sand ( dirt) obtained from ginning cotton.

860.1520 Processed Food and Feed The reregistration requirements for magnitude of the residue in processed food/ feed are satisfied for cotton. The available processing data indicate that residues of dimethipin do not concentrate in cottonseed meal ( average processing factor of < 0.22x), hulls ( average processing factor of 0.96x), or refined oil ( average processing factor of < 0.22x) processed from cotton treated at 2x the maximum seasonal rate.

Two additional processing studies were discussed in the Phase 4 Review. In one study, dimethipin was found to concentrate in cottonseed hulls at 1.4x; however, the study utilized cottonseed fortified in the laboratory and not field weathered samples. In a second study, cottonseed in CA and LA was treated with dimethipin at exaggerated rates; dimethipin residues were found to concentrate 1.4x in hulls processed from the CA samples, but residues did not concentrate in samples processed from the LA samples.

860.1850 Confined Accumulation in Rotational Crops The reregistration requirements for confined accumulation in rotational crops are not satisfied. To demonstrate the storage stability of the samples used in the supplemental confined rotational crop submission, the registrant must submit additional data/ information comparing the chromatographic profiles of the stored samples with those of the original analyses.

The registrant has submitted two confined rotational crop studies. [ 14C] Dimethipin was applied to the soil at 0.54 lb ai/ A ( 1x the maximum seasonal rate), and rotational crops of lettuce, carrots, and barley were planted 30 and 183 days after application. Samples of immature and mature lettuce, immature and mature carrot root and top, and barley forage, grain, and straw were collected. 12 Total radioactive residues accumulated above 0.01 ppm in all harvested rotational crop commodities at both plantback intervals. At the 30 day plantback interval, the highest residues were observed in barley forage ( 2.52 ppm), and the lowest residues were observed in carrot root ( immature and mature; 0.10 ppm) and barley grain ( 0.02 ppm). At the 183 day plantback interval, the highest residues were observed in carrot tops ( immature and mature; 0.508 0.705 ppm), and the lowest residues were observed in immature carrot root ( 0.017 ppm) and barley grain ( 0.018 ppm). In the 30 day plantback interval samples, dimethipin was identified in immature and mature lettuce ( 0.064 0.091 ppm), mature carrot tops ( 0.024 ppm), immature and mature carrot root ( 0.016 0.039 ppm), barley forage ( 0.025 ppm), and barley straw ( 0.012 ppm). In the 183 day plantback interval samples, dimethipin was identified in immature carrot tops ( 0.041 ppm), but was not detected in any other matrix. Metabolite H 5 ( hydroxylated dimethipin) was identified at low levels in barley straw from the 30 day plantback interval. Additional characterization data demonstrated that unidentified radioactivity generally consisted of several components, each of which comprised  0.05 ppm. Two additional metabolites, H 80 ( dimethipin cysteine conjugate) and a mercaptolactic acid conjugate, were identified in the extracts of 30 DAT immature lettuce, at 2.10% TRR ( 0.023 ppm) and 13.68% TRR ( 0.151 ppm), respectively.

The results of the confined rotational crop study indicate that dimethipin is extensively metabolized in rotational crops. The registrant proposed that dimethipin is metabolized in rotational lettuce and carrots through glutathione conjugation followed by degradation to cysteine conjugates. Further oxidation at the amino group leads to the formation of mercaptolactic acid conjugates.

860.1900 Field Accumulation in Rotational Crops The reregistration requirements for field accumulation in rotational crops are not satisfied. The available limited rotational crop studies indicate the potential for dimethipin residues in certain rotated crops at the established plantback interval ( 6 months). Extensive field rotational crop studies must be submitted.

Currently, a 6 month plantback interval is established for all rotational crops on the labels for EPA Reg. Nos. 400 155 and 400 398. The label for EPA Reg. No. 400 505 ( an MAI product with thidiazuron) has slightly more restrictive rotational crop restrictions: a 9 month plantback interval for lettuce, carrots, onions, and spinach; and a 6 month plantback interval for all other crops.

Two limited field rotational crop studies on the representative crops lettuce ( leafy vegetable), carrot ( root and tuber vegetable), and wheat/ oat ( small grain) reflecting plantback intervals of one month and six months are available. Two trials were conducted for each crop in MS and TX at each plantback interval. At each trial site, a primary crop of cotton received two applications of a 4.9 lb/ gal FlC formulation at approximately 0.31 and 0.23 lb ai/ A ( 1x the maximum seasonal rate). Cotton was harvested, disced into the soil, and rotational crops were planted approximately one month and six months after last application of the test substance. The trial sites were representative of the areas where cotton is typically grown.

Residues of dimethipin were below the LOQ (< 0.02 ppm) to 0.031 ppm in lettuce, < 0.02 ppm in carrot roots, 0.034 0.071 ppm in carrot tops, 0.027 0.039 ppm in wheat forage, < 0.02 ppm in wheat grain, and < 0.02 0.023 ppm in wheat straw planted one month after application of 13 dimethipin. Residues of dimethipin were below the LOQ (< 0.02 ppm) in lettuce, < 0.02 0.024 ppm in carrot roots, < 0.02 0.180 ppm in carrot tops, < 0.02 ppm in oat forage, < 0.02 ppm in oat grain, and < 0.02 0.021 ppm in oat straw planted six months after dimethipin application. At both plantback intervals, residues were highest in carrot tops.

Adequate supporting storage stability data are required before these studies may be classified as acceptable. The submitted data indicate that at a minimum, extensive field rotational crop studies will be required for all crops, except leafy vegetables, for which the registrant wishes to allow a 6 month plantback interval. The need for rotational crop tolerances will be determined upon submission of the studies.

860.1650 Submittal of Analytical Reference Standards As of 7/ 10/ 2003, an analytical reference standard for dimethipin is available at the EPA National Pesticide Standards Repository. 14 Table 5. Residue Chemistry Science Assessment for Reregistration of Dimethipin ( PC Code 118901).

GLN Data Requirements Current Tolerances ( ppm) [ § 180.406( a)] Additional Data Needed? MRID Nos. 1 860.1200: Directions for Use N/ A = Not Applicable No See Table 3 and Appendix 1 860.1300: Nature of the Residue  Plants N/ A No 434369012 860.1300: Nature of the Residue  Animals N/ A No 427060013 430867014 439221015 860.1340: Residue Analytical Method  Plant Commodities N/ A No6 00085669 00136860 93089025 93089038 424670027 429209038 431098019 4397910310  Livestock Commodities N/ A No11 4396640112 44147201 4414720213 860.1360: Multiresidue Method N/ A No 4309650114 860.1380: Storage Stability Data  Plant Commodities N/ A Yes15 4271270116 4393140117  Livestock Commodities N/ A No 4396640118 4419000119 860.1400: Magnitude of the Residue  Water, Fish, and Irrigated Crops N/ A 860.1460: Magnitude of the Residue  Food Handling N/ A 860.1480: Magnitude of the Residue  Meat, Milk, Poultry, Eggs  Fat, Meat, and Meat Byproducts of Cattle, Goats, Hogs, Horses, and Sheep 0.02 No 4396640120 44147201 4414720221  Milk None established No 4396640120  Eggs and the Fat, Meat, and Meat Byproducts of Poultry None established No22 860.1500: Crop Field Trials Miscellaneous Commodities  Cotton, seed and gin byproducts 0.5 Yes23 424670017 429209018 4318410124 860.1520: Processed Food/ Feed  Cotton 0.7, hulls No 00080098 00085666 93089026 93089039 429209028 860.1850: Confined Accumulation in Rotational Crops N/ A Yes25 4266630126 4275780126 43768201 4376820227 4393130127 860.1900: Field Accumulation in Rotational Crops N/ A Yes28 4397910129 4397910230 15 1. Bolded references were discussed in the Dimethipin Phase 4 Review, dated 9/ 26/ 91. All other references were reviewed as noted.

2. DP Barcode D209289, 2/ 21/ 96, C. Swartz.

3. DP Barcode D189870, 4/ 29/ 94, C. Swartz.

4. DP Barcode D198876, 3/ 16/ 94, C. Swartz.

5. DP Barcode D223337, 7/ 21/ 04, D. Drew.

6. The method ( MRID 43109801) should be forwarded to FDA for publication in PAM Vol. II as a replacement for Method I.

7. DP Barcode D182559, 8/ 16/ 93, K. Dockter.

8. DP Barcode D196057, 8/ 18/ 94, F. Fort.

9. DP Barcode D199486, 6/ 22/ 94, C. Swartz.

10. 860.1340 DER for MRID 43979103; DP Barcode D225417, 7/ 21/ 04, D. Drew.

11. Analytical methods for livestock commodities are not required.

12. 860.1340 DER for MRID 43966401; DP Barcode D224851, 7/ 21/ 04, D. Drew.

13. 860.1340 DER for MRIDs 44147201 & 44147202; DP Barcode D299519, 7/ 21/ 04, D. Drew.

14. DP Barcode D199242, 5/ 9/ 94, C. Swartz.

15. Storage stability data are required to support the field rotational crop studies.

16. DP Barcode D190381, 11/ 2/ 93, C. Swartz.

17. 860.1380 DER for MRID 43931401; DP Barcode D223703,7/ 21/ 04, D. Drew.

18. 860.1380 DER for MRID 43966401; DP Barcode D224851,7/ 21/ 04, D. Drew.

19. 860.1380 DER for MRID 44190001; DP Barcode D233851, 7/ 21/ 04, D. Drew.

20. 860.1480 DER for MRID 43966401; DP Barcode D224851, 7/ 21/ 04, D. Drew.

21. 860.1480 DER for MRIDs 44147201 & 44147202; DP Barcode D299519, 7/ 21/ 04, D. Drew.

22. There is no expectation of finite dimethipin residues in poultry commodities.

23. Crop field trial data for cotton gin byproducts must be submitted.

24. DP Barcode D201816, 6/ 6/ 95, C. Swartz.

25. Additional storage stability data/ information comparing the chromatographic profiles of stored samples with those from the original analysis is required to support the supplemental confined rotational crop data.

26. DP Barcodes D210088 & D192171, 2/ 1/ 95. L. Cheng. 16 27. 860.1850 DER for MRIDs 43768201, 43768202, & 43931301; DP Barcodes D219060 & D223855,7/ 21/ 04, D. Drew.

28. Extensive field rotational crop studies must be submitted for all crops, except leafy vegetables, the registrant wishes to allow to be rotated after dimethipin application.

29. 860.1900 DER for MRID 43979101; DP Barcode D225417, 7/ 21/ 04 D. Drew.

30. 860.1900 DER for MRID 43979102; DP Barcode D225417, 7/ 21/ 04, D. Drew. 17 TOLERANCE REASSESSMENT SUMMARY Tolerance Reassessments for Dimethipin The tolerances listed in 40 CFR § 180.406( a) are expressed in terms of dimethipin ( 2,3 dihydro 5,6 dimethyl 1,4 dithiin 1,1,4,4 tetraoxide; CAS Reg. No. 55290 64 7) per se. The current tolerance expression is adequate.

Tolerances Listed Under 40 CFR § 180.406( a):

Adequate residue data have been submitted to reassess the established tolerance for undelinted cottonseed; the tolerance is reassessed at the same level.

The available processing data indicate that dimethipin residues do not concentrate in cotton hulls. The established tolerance for cotton hulls should be revoked.

Although feeding study data, reflecting exaggerated dosing levels, indicate that there are no expectation of finite residues in the fat, meat, or meat byproducts of cattle, goat, horses, hogs or sheep, HED recommends that the tolerances for dimethipin in livestock meat and meat byproducts not be revoked in order to harmonize with the established Codex MRLs. The U. S. tolerances for livestock meat and meat byproducts and Codex MRLs for mammalian meat and edible offal are established at 0.02 ppm, which is at or about the limit of quantitation.

The U. S. tolerances for dimethipin in the fat of cattle, goat, horses, hogs and sheep should be revoked as there is no expectation of finite residues in these commodities and there are no Codex MRLs established ( dimethipin is not considered fat soluble so no MRL set for " meat ( fat)").

There is no U. S. tolerance for dimethipin in milk. A tolerance for milk is not required as there is no expectation of finite residues of dimethipin in milk.

Tolerances To Be Proposed Under 40 CFR § 180.406( a):

A tolerance must be proposed for cotton gin byproducts; adequate crop field trial data must be submitted before the appropriate tolerance level may be determined.

A summary of dimethipin tolerance reassessments is presented in Table 6. 18 Table 6. Tolerance Reassessment Summary for Dimethipin.

Commodity Current Tolerance ( ppm) Range of Residues ( ppm) Tolerance Reassessment ( ppm) Comment/[ Correct Commodity Definition]

Tolerances Listed Under 40 CFR § 180.406( a):

Cotton, undelinted seed 0.5 < 0.10 0.260 0.5 Cotton, hulls 0.7 average processing factor = 0.95x Revoke No tolerance for cotton hulls is necessary because residues do not concentrate.

Cattle, fat 0.02 < 0.01 at a 9.6x dosing level Revoke The available feeding study data, reflecting exaggerated dosing levels, indicate that there is no expectation of finite residues. However, tolerances should be maintained, except for fat, to harmonize with CODEX MRLs. Tolerances for fat should be revoked as there are no CODEX MRLs for fat. Cattle, meat 0.02 0.02 Cattle, meat byproducts 0.02 0.02 Goat, fat 0.02 Revoke Goat, meat 0.02 0.02 Goat, meat byproducts 0.02 0.02 Hog, fat 0.02 Revoke Hog, meat 0.02 0.02 Hog, meat byproducts 0.02 0.02 Horse, fat 0.02 Revoke Horse, meat 0.02 0.02 Horse, meat byproducts 0.02 0.02 Sheep, fat 0.02 Revoke Sheep, meat 0.02 0.02 Sheep, meat byproducts 0.02 0.02 Tolerances to Be Proposed under 40 CFR 180.406( a):

Cotton, gin byproducts   TBD1 1 TBD = To be determined. Additional residue crop field trial data are required.

Codex/ International Harmonization The Codex Alimentarius Commission has established several maximum residue limits ( MRLs) for residues of dimethipin in/ on various commodities. The Codex MRLs are expressed in terms of dimethipin per se. The Codex MRL and the U. S. tolerance expressions are compatible. A comparison of the Codex MRLs and the corresponding reassessed U. S. tolerances is presented in Table 7.

There are no Canadian MRLs established for dimethipin. There are Mexican MRLs for " dimetipin" on cottonseed ( 0.5 mg/ kg) and potato ( 0.05 mg/ kg). 19 Table 7. Codex MRLs and applicable U. S. tolerances for dimethipin. Recommendations are based on conclusions following reassessment of U. S. tolerances ( see Table 6).

Codex Reassessed U. S. Tolerance, ppm Recommendation And Comments Commodity, As Defined MRL ( mg/ kg) Step Cottonseed 0.5 CXL 0.5 Harmonized.

Cotton seed oil, Crude 0.1 CXL  No separate tolerance established in U. S. for cotton seed oil.

Cotton seed oil, Edible 0.02(*) 1 CXL  No separate tolerance established in U. S. for cotton seed oil.

Edible offal ( mammalian) 0.02(*) CXL 0.02 ( meat byproducts) Harmonized Eggs 0.02(*) CXL  U. S. tolerances not necessary for poultry commodities.

Linseed 0.2 CXL  No U. S. registrations for use on linseed.

Meat ( from mammals other than marine mammals) 0.02(*) CXL 0.02 ( meat) Harmonized Milks 0.02(*) CXL  U. S. tolerance not necessary for milk.

Potato 0.05(*) CXL  No U. S. registrations for use on potato.

Poultry meat 0.02(*) CXL  U. S. tolerances not necessary for poultry commodities.

Poultry, Edible offal of 0.02(*) CXL  U. S. tolerances not necessary for poultry commodities.

Rape seed 0.1 CXL  No U. S. registrations for use on rape seed.

Sunflower seed 0.5 CXL  No U. S. registrations for use on sunflower.

Sunflower seed oil, Crude 0.1 CXL  No U. S. registrations for use on sunflower.

Sunflower seed oil, Edible 0.02 CXL  No U. S. registrations for use on sunflower.

1 (*) = At or about the limit of determination. 20 BIBLIOGRAPHY Study Citations 42467001 Korpalski, S. ( 1992) Harvade 5F on Cotton: Magnitude of the Residue: Lab Project Number: A026.010: RP 91034. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Analytical Services. 575 p.

42467002 Korpalski, S. ( 1992) Harvade in Cotton Seed: Method Validation: Lab Project Number: A026.009: RP 91056. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Analytical Services. 73 p 42666301 Perhach, M.; Jalal, M. ( 1993) A Confined Rotational Crop Study on Harvade ( 30 Day Aging): Dimethipin: Lab Project Number: ML 91 725: 9174. Unpublished study prepared by Pan Agricultural Labs., Inc. 165 p.

42706001 Lau, R.; Gay, M. ( 1993) Nature of the Residue of ( carbon 14) Harvade in Laying Hen: Lab Project Number: 91121: 91104: URC 01 91. Unpublished study prepared by Uniroyal and Enviro Bio Tech, Ltd. 435 p.

42712701 Korpalski, S. ( 1993) Freezer Storage Stability of Harvade ( Dimethipin) in Cottonseed: Lab Project Number: A026.011: RP 91055. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Analytical Services, Division of Empire Soils Investigations, Inc. 95 p.

42757801 Perhach, M. ( 1993) A Confined Rotational Crop Study on HARVADE ( 183 Day Aging): Dimethipin: A Supplement: Lab Project Number: 9183: ML 91 726. Unpublished study prepared by Pan Agricultural Labs, Inc. 233 p.

42920901 Korpalski, S. ( 1993) HARVADE 5F on Cotton: Magnitude of the Residue: Lab Project Number: RP 92026: ML92 0345 UNI. Unpublished study prepared by Morse Laboratories, Inc. 299 p.

42920902 Korpalski, S. ( 1993) HARVADE 5F on Cotton: Processing Study: Lab Project Number: ML92 0346 UNI: RP 92027. Unpublished study prepared by Morse Laboratories, Inc. 293 p.

42920903 Korpalski, S. ( 1993) Method Validation for HARVADE in Cottonseed and Commodities Generated from Cottonseed Processing: Lab Project Number: ML92 0347 UNI: RP 92033. Unpublished study prepared by Morse Laboratories, Inc. 89 p.

43086701 Byrd, J. ( 1992) Nature of the Residue of Radiolabeled HARVADE in Lactating Goat: Part I. ( Dimethipin) Lab Project Number: 9202, 9275G. Unpublished study prepared by Southwest Bio Labs, Inc. 109 p. 21 43096501 Thiem, D.; Rhoads, W. ( 1994) Multiresidue Study: Testing of Dimethipin Through FDA Multiresidue Protocols C, D, and E: Final Report: Lab Project Number: RP/ 93032: UNIROYAL/ 1208. Unpublished study prepared by Colorado Analytical Research & Development Corp. 100 p.

43109801 Koch, D.; Cooper, J. ( 1994) Independent Laboratory Method Validation for Dimethipin in Cottonseed: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 41344: RP/ 93033. Unpublished study prepared by ABC Laboratories, Inc. 121 p.

43184101 Korpalski, S. ( 1994) HARVADE 5F on Cotton: Magnitude of the Residue: Amended Final Report: Lab Project Number: A026.010: RP 91034: WSM 91 009. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Analytical Services, Mid South Ag Research and S L Agri Development. 580 p.

43436901 Burke, B.; Johnson, K. ( 1994) Metabolism of ( Carbon 13)/( Carbon 14) HARVADE Used as Defoliant in Cotton: Lab Project Number: 92206: PRT/ 15/ 2UON/ 01: PRT/ 15/ 2UON/ 01/ 003. Unpublished study prepared by Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc.; Plant Research Technologies, Inc. 78 p.

43768201 Perhach, M.; Jalal, M. ( 1995) A Confined Rotational Crop Study on Harvade ( Dimethipin) ( 30 Day Aging): Amended ( Final Report # 3): Lab Project Number: ML 91 725: 9174. Unpublished study prepared by Pan Agricultural Labs, Inc. 166 p.

43768202 Perhach, M. ( 1995) A Confined Rotational Crop Study on Harvade ( Dimethipin) ( 183 Day Aging): Amended ( Final Report # 1): Lab Project Number: ML 91 726: 9183. Unpublished study prepared by Pan Agricultural Labs, Inc. 244 p.

43922101 Lau, R.; Gay, M. ( 1996) Nature of the Residue of Dimethipin in Lactating Goat: Lab Project Number: 9202: 9275G: 95089G. Unpublished study prepared by Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc. and Southwest Bio Labs, Inc. 363 p.

43931301 Ryan, J. ( 1996) Upgrade of HARVADE ( Dimethipin) Confined Rotational Crop Study: 30 and 183 Days Aging: Lab Project Number: XBL95082: RPT00264: 95119. Unpublished study prepared by XenoBiotic Laboratories, Inc. 188 p.

43931401 Korpalski, S. ( 1996) Freezer Storage Stability of Dimethipin in Cottonseed Processed Commodities: Lab Project Number: ML95 0510 UNI: RP 94025: SJK17\ SK60123D. Unpublished study prepared by Morse Labs, Inc. 146 p.

43966401 Singh, H.; Eckert, J. ( 1996) In Life Feeding Study of Dimethipin: Determination of the Magnitude of Residues in Milk, Tissues, and Dosing Capsules; Method Validation in Various Substrates; and Freezer Storage Stability of Dimethipin in Milk and Tissues: Lab Project Number: UR 01 95: 95156: EBT 220.02. Unpublished study prepared by Enviro Bio Tech, Ltd. 168 p. 22 43979101 Korpalski, S. ( 1996) Thirty Day HARVADE Field Rotational Crop Study: Lab Project Number: ML94 0467 UNI: RP 94009: METH 74. Unpublished study prepared by Morse Laboratories, Inc. 336 p.

43979102 Korpalski, S. ( 1995) Six Month HARVADE Field Rotational Crop Study: Lab Project Number: RP 93014: ML93 0392 UNI: METH 74. Unpublished study prepared by Morse Laboratories, Inc. 279 p.

43979103 Korpalski, S. ( 1995) Method Validation for Dimethipin in Rotational Crop Matrices: Lab Project Number: ML94 0498 UNI: RP 94021: METH 74. Unpublished study prepared by Morse Laboratories, Inc. 94 p.

44147201 Hughes, D.; Patzer, S. ( 1996) Determination of 1,2 Ethanedisulfonic Acid in Beef Kidney: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 6111 155: 96037: CHW 6111 155. Unpublished study prepared by Corning Hazleton Inc. 33 p.

44147202 Batorewicz, W.; Long, S. ( 1996) Confirmational Analysis: Analytical Method for Determination of 1,2 Ethanedisulfonic Acid in Beef Kidney: Lab Project Number: 96099: 93179. Unpublished study prepared by Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc. 38 p.

44190001 Hughes, D.; Halverson, R. ( 1996) Storage Stability of 1,2 Ethanedisulfonic Acid in Beef Kidney: Final Report: Lab Project Number: CHW 6111 156: 96039: 6111 156. Unpublished study prepared by Corning Hazleton, Inc. 48 p.

93089025 Mertz, J. ( 1990) Uniroyal Chemical Company Inc. Phase 3 Summary of MRID 00136860 and Related MRIDs 00085669. Determination of N252 Residues in Cottonseed: Project No. 7524. Prepared by Uniroyal Chemical Co. Inc. 11 p.

93089026 Gaydosh, K. ( 1990) Uniroyal Chemical Company Inc. Phase 3 Summary of MRID 00080098 and Related MRIDs 00085666. Harvade Residues in Cottonseed Fractions and Harvade Residues in Processed Cottonseed. Prepared by Uniroyal Chemical Co. Inc. 9 p.

93089038 Womer, J.; Sisken, H. ( 1990) Uniroyal Chemical Company Inc. Phase 3 Reformat of MRID 00136860 and Related MRIDs 00085669. Determination of N252 Residues in Cottonseed: Project No. 7524. Prepared by Uniroyal Chemical Co. 48 p.

93089039 Ball, J.; Ames, R. ( 1990) Uniroyal Chemical Company Inc. Phase 3 Reformat of MRID 00080098 and Related MRIDs 00085666. Harvade Residues in Cottonseed Fractions and Harvade Residues in Processed Cottonseed. Prepared by Uniroyal Chemical Company. 75 p. 23 ( continued)

Agency Memoranda Citations Table 8. Agency Memoranda Citations.

Date DP Barcode CB No. From To MRID Nos. Subject 8/ 20/ 92 D181121 10310 S. Knizner M. Wilhite None Dimethipin. Time extension request for Guideline 171

4( b). Chemical # 118901. Case # 3063.

8/ 16/ 93 D182559 10597 K. Dockter B. Sidwell/

M. Wilhite 42467001 42467002 Reregistration of Dimethipin. Uniroyal Responses of 9/ 03/ 92 to GDLN 171 4( c)  Cottonseed Residue Analytical Method, and to GDLN 171 4( k)  Magnitude of the Residue  Cotton Field Trials. Case# 3063;

Chemical# 118901.

11/ 2/ 93 D190381 11753 B. Cropp Kohlligian B. Sidwell 42712701 Dimethipin Reregistration. Cottonseed Storage Stability Data. Chemical No. 118901. Case No. 3063.

3/ 16/ 94 D198876 13177 C. Swartz B. Sidwell 43086701 Dimethipin. List C Reregistration Case No.

3063/ Chemical ID NO. 118901. Ruminant metabolism,

Preliminary Report.

4/ 29/ 94 D189870 11669 C. Swartz B. Sidwell 42706001 Dimethipin. List C Reregistration Case No.

3063/ Chemical ID NO. 118901. Guideline No. 171

4( b): Poultry Metabolism.

5/ 9/ 94 D199242 13211 C. Swartz H. Hundley 43096501 Dimethipin. List C. Reregistration Case No.

3063/ Chemical ID No. 118901. Multiresidue Method Testing.

6/ 22/ 94 D199486 13221 C. Swartz B. Sidwell 43109801 Dimethipin. List C. Reregistration Case No.

3063/ Chemical ID No. 118901. Analytical Method for Determination of Residues in Cottonseed: Independent Laboratory Validation.

8/ 18/ 94 D196057 12736 F. Fort M. Wilhite/

B. Sidwell 42920901 42920902 42920903 Dimethipin. Cottonseed Field Trial and Processing Study and Method Validation Table 8. Agency Memoranda Citations.

Date DP Barcode CB No. From To MRID Nos. Subject 24 ( continued)

1/ 23/ 95 or 1/ 24/ 95 N/ A  C. Swartz B. Sidwell None Dimethipin. List C Reregistration Case No. 3063/

Chemical ID No. 118901. 12/ 14/ 94 Meeting with Uniroyal to Discuss Progress in the Ruminant Metabolism Study.

2/ 1/ 95 D210088 &

D192171 14824 &

12037 L. Cheng M. Wilhite 42666301 42757801 Dimethipin. Case No. 3063. Confined Crop Rotation Study.

5/ 9/ 95 D214987 15500 G. Kramer Chemistry Branch Files None Dimethipin Application of DES Proviso to Existing Feed Additive Tolerances.

6/ 6/ 95 D201816 13546 C. Swartz B. Sidwell 43184101 Dimethipin. List C. Reregistration Case No.

3063/ Chemical ID No. 118901. Magnitude of the Residue in Cotton: GLP Amendment to MRID No.

42467001.

12/ 7/ 95 D217387 &

D217388 15878 &

15879 B. Schneider C. Giles Parker None ID# 000400 00155, 000400 0398. Review of label amendment for Dimethipin ( Harvade ®  5F, Harvade ® 25F Harvest Growth Regulant) to Determine if Established Tolerances Cover the Proposed Uses for Cotton.

2/ 21/ 96 D209289 14720 C. Swartz B. Sidwell 43436901 Dimethipin. List C Reregistration Case No.

3063/ Chemical ID No. 118901. Nature of the Residue in Cotton [ Guideline Ref. No. 171 4( a)].

9/ 2/ 98 D233856  S. Mason P. Budig 43109801 Dimethipin Reregistration. Analytical Method for Residue Analysis in Cottonseed: Independent Laboratory Validation.

7/ 21/ 04 D223337  D. Drew A. Johnson 43922101 Dimethipin metabolism in goats 7/ 21/ 04 D219060 &

D223855 16190 &

16967 D. Drew  43768201 43768202 43931301 860.1850 DER for MRIDs 43768201, 43768202, &

43931301: Confined Rotational Crop Data to Upgrade Previously Submitted Study. Table 8. Agency Memoranda Citations.

Date DP Barcode CB No. From To MRID Nos. Subject 25 7/ 21/ 04 D223703 16959 D. Drew  43931401 860.1380 DER for MRID 43931401: Storage Stability Data for Dimethipin in Cottonseed Processed Commodities 7/ 21/ 04 D224851 17084 D. Drew  43966401 860.1340 DER for MRID 43966401: Residue Analytical Method for Dimethipin in Cattle Matrices.

860.1380 DER for MRID 43966401: Storage Stability Data for Dimethipin in Cattle Matrices.

860.1480 DER for MRID 43966401: Cattle Feeding Study Data for Dimethipin.

7/ 21/ 04 D225417  D. Drew  43979101 860.1900 DER for MRID 43979101: Limited Field Rotational Crop Data for One Month Plantback Interval.

43979102 860.1900 DER for MRID 43979102: Limited Field Rotational Crop Data for Six Month Plantback Interval.

43979103 860.1340 DER for MRID 43979103: Residue Analytical Method for Dimethipin in Rotational Crops.

7/ 21/ 04 D299519   D. Drew  44147201 44147202 860.1340 DER for MRIDs 44147201 & 44147202:

Residue Analytical Methods for the Determination of 1,2 Ethanedisulfonic Acid in Cattle Kidney.

860.1480 DER for MRIDs 44147201 & 44147202:

Residues of 1,2 Ethanedisulfonic Acid in Cattle Kidney.

7/ 21/ 04 D233851  D. Drew  44190001 860.1380 DER for MRID 44190001: Storage Stability Data for EDSA in Cattle Kidney. 26 S S CH 3 CH 3 O O O O SO 3 H HO 3 S S S O O O O CH 3 O APPENDIX I Table A1. Summary of Chemical Structures for Dimethipin Metabolites Name Structure Study Identified (% TRR)

Dimethipin Cotton metabolism: foliage ( 74%); seed ( 80%)

Lettuce( mature and immature), carrot ( root and top), barley ( grain and straw): 30 day PBI confined rotational study.

Reduced Dimethipin Poultry metabolism ( 0.98 7.8% in all matrices, except thigh muscle)

Ruminant metabolism ( 21.9%, only in muscle at the high dose)

Glu Cys S Harv:

S( 2,3 dimethyl 1,1,4,4 tetraoxo 1,4 dithian yl) L cysteinyl

 glutamic acid Poultry metabolism ( 19 36% in all matrices)

HARV S Cys ( dimethipin cysteine):

S( 2,3 dimethyl 1,1,4,4 tetraoxo 1,4 dithian 2 yl) L cysteine Poultry metabolism ( 0.1 7.0% in all matrices, except fat)

Ruminant metabolism ( 25.2  52.8% in milk only)

Confined rotational crop study ( 2.1% in immature lettuce only at the 30 day PBI)

Ethane disulfonic acid Ruminant metabolism ( 14.6 44.8% in liver; 27.6 75.6% in kidney)

Acetyl dithian tetraoxide Ruminant metabolism ( 16.6% in liver at low dose; 40 50% in liver at high dose; 32.3% in kidney at high dose only) Table A1. Summary of Chemical Structures for Dimethipin Metabolites Name Structure Study Identified (% TRR)

27 S S CH 3 O O O O S CH 3 N H 2 COOH S S CH 3 O O O O S CH 3 O H COOH Hydroxylated dimethipin ( H 5) unavailable Confined rotational crop study ( 0.009 ppm in barley straw only at the 30 day PBI). Aqueous photolysis study at < 2% of the applied.

H 80 S( 2,3 dimethyl 1,4 dithian 2 yl) 1,1,4,4 tetraoxide cysteine Confined rotational crop study ( 2.1% in immature lettuce only at the 30 day PBI)

Dimethipin mercaptolactic acid conjugate S( 2,3 dimethyl 1,4 dithian 2 yl) 1,1,4,4 tetraoxide mercaptolactic acid Confined rotational crop study ( 13.68% in immature lettuce only at the 30 day PBI) Page 28 of 28 SITE NAME Product/ Site Limitations Application Type ( for any Reg.# at any rate) ( aggregate)

Application Timing ( for any Reg.# at any rate)

Application Equipment ( for any Reg.# at any rate) ( aggregate) Max. Single Appl.

Rate to a Single Site ( AI unless noted otherwise) Inconvertible Label ( L) Dosages Also Present Max Seasonal Rate ( L) Dosages Also Present Max. #

Apps Per Crop Cycle ( cc) and Year ( at any rate) Min Retmt Intv ( days)

( at any rate) PHI/ PGI/ PSI Use Limitations ( at any rate) ( May not apply to all Reg. # s within group)

COTTON ( UNSPECIFIED) Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.

Do not apply through any type of irrigation system.

Do not apply when drift is likely to occur.

Do not apply when wind velocity is 10 mph or greater.

Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of equipment wash waters.

Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.

Rotational/ plant back crop restriction.

Spray After boll opening Aircraft/ Ground .30625 lb A NS NS NS NS Geographic allowable: CA Broadcast/ Low volume spray ( concentrate)/ Spray Foliar Aircraft/ Ground .3125 lb A NS NS NS NS Geographic allowable: AL AR FL GA KS LA MO MS NC NM OK SC TN TX VA Geographic disallowable: OK TX Spray Preharvest Aircraft/ Ground .3828 lb A .5625 lb/ yr NS NS 5 Geographic allowable: AL AR FL GA LA MO MS NC OK SC TN TX VA Geographic disallowable: OK TX Product Number( s) Contained in this Report :

000400 00155 000400 00398 000400 00505 cc: RF, D. Drew, Amaris Johnson ( SRRD)

RDI: ChemSAC ( 7/ 14/ 04); C. Eiden ( 7/ 22/ 04)


[Federal Register: April 11, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 69)]
[Notices]
[Page 18224-18225]
[DOCID:fr11ap07-55]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP05-15-003]

Caledonia Energy Partners, L.L.C.; Notice of Compliance Filing

April 5, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 30, 2007, Caledonia Energy Partners,
L.L.C. (Caledonia) submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the
Commission order issued on April 19, 2005 in Docket Nos. CP05-15-000,
CP05-16-000, and CP05-17-000, Caledonia Energy Partners, L.L.C., 111
FERC ] 61,095 (2005). Caledonia has included along with its

compliance filing, as non-conforming agreements, several ``Consents and
Agreements'' relating to each Firm Storage Service Agreement to which
Caledonia is a party.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 12, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6793 Filed 4-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 43 (Thursday, March 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12020-12022]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05067]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2015-0001; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1473]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with title
44, part 65 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR part 65). The
LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to calculate
appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and the
contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will become effective on the
dates listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS
report in effect prior to this determination for the listed
communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Mitigation reconsider the changes. The flood hazard
determination information may be changed during the 90-day period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The

flood hazard determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: February 11, 2015.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Chief executive                         Online location of
        State and county           Location and case       officer of         Community map        letter of map        Effective date of     Community
                                          No.               community          repository             revision             modification          No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Connecticut: New Haven..........  Town of Branford     Mr. James B.        1019 Main Street    http://                April 22, 2015.......       090073
                                   (15-01-0490P).       Cosgrove, First     Branford, CT        www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Selectman, Town     06405.              lomc.
                                                        of Branford, 1019
                                                        Main Street,
                                                        Branford, CT
                                                        06405.
Illinois:
    Kane........................  City of Elgin (14-   The Honorable Dave  150 Dexter Court    http://                May 6, 2015..........       170087
                                   05-4054P).           Kaptain, Mayor,     Elgin, IL.          www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        City of Elgin,                          lomc.
                                                        150 Dexter Court,
                                                        Elgin, IL.
    Adams.......................  City of Quincy (14-  The Honorable Kyle  730 Main Street,    http://                May 22, 2015.........        17003
                                   05-9049P).           Moore, Mayor,       Quincy, IL 62301.   www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        City of Quincy,                         lomc.
                                                        730 Main Street,
                                                        Quincy, IL 62301.
    Adams.......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable Les   101 North 54th      http://                May 22, 2015.........        17001
                                   Areas of Adams       Post, Chairman,     Street, Quincy,     www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (14-05-       Adams County, 101   IL 62305.           lomc.
                                   9049P).              North 54th
                                                        Street, Quincy,
                                                        IL 62305.
Indiana:
    Clark.......................  City of Jefferson    The Honorable Mike  500 Quartermaster   http://                April 17, 2015.......       180027
                                   (14-05-9401P).       Moore, Mayor,       Court,              www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        City of             Jeffersonville,     lomc.
                                                        Jeffersonville,     IN 47130.
                                                        500 Quartermaster
                                                        Court, Suite 250,
                                                        Jeffersonville,
                                                        IN 47130.
    Clark.......................  Town of Utica (14-   The Honorable Hank  736 Utica           http://                April 17, 2015.......       180487
                                   05-9401P).           Dorman, Board       Charlestown Road,   www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        President, Town     Utica, IN 47130.    lomc.
                                                        of Utica, 736
                                                        Utica Charlestown
                                                        Road, Utica, IN
                                                        47130.
    Clark.......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable Jack  501 East Court      http://                April 17, 2015.......       180426
                                   Areas of Clark       Coffman,            Avenue              www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (14-05-       President, County   Jeffersonville,     lomc.
                                   9401P).              Commissioners,      IN 47130.
                                                        501 East Court
                                                        Avenue, Room 404,
                                                        Jeffersonville,
                                                        IN 47130.
Missouri: Jasper................  City of Joplin (14-  The Honorable       602 South Main      http://                May 26, 2015.........       290183
                                   07-0736P).           Michael Seibert,    Street Joplin, MO   www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      64801.              lomc.
                                                        Joplin, 602 South
                                                        Main Street,
                                                        Joplin, MO 64801.
Ohio:
    Franklin....................  City of Columbus     The Honorable       90 West Broad       http://                May 14, 2015.........       390170
                                   (15-05-0192X).       Michael B.          Street Columbus,    www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Coleman, Mayor,     OH 43215.           lomc.
                                                        City of Columbus,
                                                        90 West Broad
                                                        Street, 2nd
                                                        Floor, Columbus,
                                                        OH 43215.
    Delaware....................  Unincorporated       The Honorable Gary  101 North Sandusky  http://                May 13, 2015.........       390146
                                   Areas of Delaware    Merrell,            Street, Delaware,   www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (14-05-       President,          OH 43015.           lomc.
                                   3856P).              Delaware County
                                                        Board of
                                                        Commissioners,
                                                        101 North
                                                        Sandusky Street,
                                                        Delaware, OH
                                                        43015.
    Marion......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       222 West Center     http://                May 13, 2015.........       390774
                                   Areas of Marion      Daniel L.           Street Marion, OH   www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (14-05-       Russell, Marion     43302.              lomc.
                                   3856P).              County Board of
                                                        Commissioners,
                                                        222 West Center
                                                        Street, Marion,
                                                        OH 43302.
Oregon:
    Washington..................  City of Hillsboro    The Honorable       150 East Main       http://                May 18, 2015.........       410243
                                   (14-10-1501P).       Jerry Willey,       Street,             www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      Hillsboro, OR       lomc.
                                                        Hillsboro, 150      97123.
                                                        East Main Street,
                                                        Hillsboro, OR
                                                        97123.

    Washington..................  Unincorporated       The Honorable Andy  155 North 1st       http://                May 18, 2015.........       410238
                                   Areas of             Duyck, Chairman,    Avenue,             www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   Washington County    Board of            Hillsboro, OR       lomc.
                                   (14-10-1501P).       Directors,          97124.
                                                        Washington
                                                        County, 155 North
                                                        1st Avenue, Suite
                                                        300, Hillsboro,
                                                        OR 97124.
Wisconsin: Portage..............  City of Stevens      The Honorable Gary  1515 Strongs        http://                May 15, 2015.........       550342
                                   Point (13-05-        Wescott, Mayor,     Avenue, Stevens     www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   4844P).              City of Steven      Point, WI 54481.    lomc.
                                                        Point, 1515
                                                        Strongs Avenue,
                                                        Stevens Point, WI
                                                        54481.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2015-05067 Filed 3-4-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P