[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 89 (Thursday, May 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27253-27254]
[FR Doc No: 2020-09796]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension:
    Rule 203A-2(d), SEC File No. 270-630, OMB Control No. 3235-0689

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collections of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget (``OMB'') for extension and approval.
    The title of the collection of information is: ``Exemption for
Certain Multi-State Investment Advisers (Rule 203A-2(d)).'' Its
currently approved OMB control number is 3235-0689. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
    Pursuant to section 203A of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(the ``Act'') (15 U.S.C. 80b-3a), an investment adviser that is
regulated or required to be regulated as an investment adviser in the
state in which it maintains its principal office and place of business
is prohibited from registering with the Commission unless that adviser
has at least $25 million in assets under management or advises a
Commission-registered investment company. Section 203A also prohibits
from Commission registration an adviser that: (i) Has assets under
management between $25 million and $100 million; (ii) is required to be
registered as an investment adviser with the state in which it
maintains its principal office and place of business; and (iii) if
registered, would be subject to examination as an adviser by that state
(a ``mid-sized adviser''). A mid-sized adviser that otherwise would be
prohibited may register with the Commission if it would be required to
register with 15 or more states. Similarly, Rule 203A-2(d) under the
Act (17 CFR 275.203a-2(d)) provides that the prohibition on
registration with the Commission does not apply to an investment
adviser that is required to register in 15 or more states. An
investment adviser relying on this exemption also must: (i) Include a
representation on Schedule D of Form ADV that the investment adviser
has concluded that it must register as an investment adviser with the
required number of states; (ii) undertake to withdraw from registration
with the Commission if the adviser indicates on an annual updating
amendment to Form ADV that it would be required by the laws of fewer
than 15 states to register as an investment adviser with the state; and
(iii) maintain in an easily accessible place a record of the states in
which the investment adviser has determined it would, but for the
exemption, be required to register for a period of not less than five
years from the filing of a Form ADV relying on the rule.
    Respondents to this collection of information are investment
advisers required to register in 15 or more states absent the exemption
that rely on rule 203A-2(d) to register with the Commission. The
information collected under rule 203A-2(d) permits the Commission's
examination staff to determine an adviser's eligibility for
registration with the Commission under this exemptive rule and is also
necessary for the Commission staff to use in its examination and
oversight program. This collection of information is codified at 17 CFR
275.203a-2(d) and is mandatory to qualify for and maintain Commission
registration eligibility under rule 203A-2(d). Responses to the
recordkeeping requirements under rule 203A-2(d) in the context of the
Commission's examination and oversight program are generally kept
confidential.
    The estimated number of investment advisers subject to the
collection of information requirements under the rule is 106. These
advisers will incur an average one-time initial burden of approximately
8 hours, and an average ongoing burden of approximately 8 hours per
year, to keep records sufficient to demonstrate that they meet the 15-
state threshold. These estimates are based on an estimate that each
year an investment adviser will spend

approximately 0.5 hours creating a record of its determination whether
it must register as an investment adviser with each of the 15 states
required to rely on the exemption, and approximately 0.5 hours to
maintain these records. Accordingly, we estimate that rule 203A-2(d)
results in an annual aggregate burden of collection for SEC-registered
investment advisers of a total of 848 hours. Estimates of average
burden hours are made solely for the purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, and are not derived from a comprehensive or even a
representative survey or study of the costs of Commission rules and
forms.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to David Bottom, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Cynthia
Roscoe, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549; or send an email to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: May 4, 2020.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-09796 Filed 5-6-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 41 (Friday, March 3, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12415-12416]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04110]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2016-1023]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Annisquam River and Blynman
Canal, Gloucester, MA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from drawbridge regulations;
modification.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has modified a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the Blynman (SR127) Bridge across the
Annisquam River and Blynman Canal at mile 0.0 at Gloucester, MA. This
modified deviation allows the bridge to remain in the closed-to-
navigation position and is necessary to perform bridge repairs.

DATES: This modified deviation is effective from 7 a.m. on March 13,
2017 through 4 p.m. on March 19, 2017.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this deviation, USCG-2016-1023 is available
at http://www.regulations.gov. Type the docket number in the ``SEARCH''
box and click ``SEARCH''. Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this modified
temporary deviation, call or email Mr. Jeffrey Stieb, First Coast Guard
District Bridge Branch, Coast Guard, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 9, 2016, the Coast Guard
published a temporary deviation entitled ``Drawbridge Operation
Regulation; Annisquam River and

Blynman Canal, Gloucester, MA'' in the Federal Register (81 FR 89007).
The temporary deviation allows the bridge to be opened with a two hour
advance notice during the hours of 8 p.m. through 4 a.m. from December
6, 2016 through April 30, 2017.
    The owner of the bridge, the Massachusetts Department of
Transportation, has requested a modification of the currently published
deviation in order to close the bridge to navigation from 7 a.m. on
Monday, March 13, 2017 through 4 p.m. on Sunday, March 19, 2017, for
necessary repairs. Two bascule leaf motors will be removed off site to
be rehabilitated and reinstalled. During the period of this
modification the draw span will be inoperable.
    The waterways are transited primarily by seasonal recreational
vessels of various sizes. On average, twelve requests were made
annually during the seven day period in March for which the
modification is requested. The bridge will not be able to open for
emergencies. The Coast Guard contacted local waterway users regarding
the Commonwealth's request for this modification and received no
objections. The height of the bridge in the closed position is eight
feet. Vessels able to pass through the bridge in the closed position
may continue to do so. The northern entrance to the Annisquam River can
be used as an alternate route for vessels to Ipswich Bay and the
Atlantic Ocean.
    The Coast Guard will inform users of the bridge closure through our
Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners so vessel operators can arrange
their transit to minimize impacts. The drawbridge schedule will return
to regular operation on April 30, 2017. This deviation from the
operating regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: February 27, 2017.
C.J. Bisignano,
Supervisory Bridge Management Specialist, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2017-04110 Filed 3-2-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: June 9, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 109)]
[Notices]
[Page 27326-27327]
[DOCID:fr09jn09-68]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0664]

Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory
committee of the Food and Drug Administration

(FDA). The meeting will be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and
recommendations to the agency on FDA's regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on July 30, 2009, from 8
a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: Hilton Washington DC/Silver Spring, The Ballroom, 8727
Colesville Rd., Silver Spring, MD. The hotel telephone number is 301-
589-5200.
    Contact Person: Cicely Reese, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research (HFD-21), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane (for
express delivery, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1093), Rockville, MD 20857,
301-827-7001, FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138<PHONE_NUMBER>
in the Washington, DC area), code<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please call the
Information Line for up-to-date information on this meeting. A notice
in the Federal Register about last minute modifications that impact a
previously announced advisory committee meeting cannot always be
published quickly enough to provide timely notice. Therefore, you
should always check the agency's Web site and call the appropriate
advisory committee hot line/phone line to learn about possible
modifications before coming to the meeting.
    Agenda: The committee will discuss the safety and efficacy of new
drug application (NDA) 22-117, proposed trade name SAPHRIS (asenapine
maleate) sublingual tablets, Organon, a part of Schering-Plough Corp.,
for the following indications: (1) Acute treatment of schizophrenia in
adults and (2) acute treatment of manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I
disorder in adults.
    FDA intends to make background material available to the public no
later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post
the background material on its Web site prior to the meeting, the
background material will be made publicly available at the location of
the advisory committee meeting, and the background material will be
posted on FDA's Web site after the meeting. Background material is
available at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/acmenu.htm, click on
the year 2009 and scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee
link.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee.
Written submissions may be made to the contact person on or before July
21, 2009. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between
approximately 1 p.m. and 2 p.m. Those desiring to make formal oral
presentations should notify the contact person and submit a brief
statement of the general nature of the evidence or arguments they wish
to present, the names and addresses of proposed participants, and an
indication of the approximate time requested to make their presentation
on or before July 13, 2009. Time allotted for each presentation may be
limited. If the number of registrants requesting to speak is greater
than can be reasonably accommodated during the scheduled open public
hearing session, FDA may conduct a lottery to determine the speakers
for the scheduled open public hearing session. The contact person will
notify interested persons regarding their request to speak by July 14,
2009.
    Persons attending FDA's advisory committee meetings are advised
that the agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical
outlets.
    FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with
physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special
accommodations due to a disability, please contact Cicely Reese at
least 7 days in advance of the meeting.
    FDA is committed to the orderly conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our Web site at http://www.fda.gov/oc/advisory/
default.htm for procedures on public conduct during advisory committee
meetings.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: June 2, 2009.
Randall W. Lutter,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E9-13371 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73814-73817]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28926]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0057; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-210-AD;
Amendment 39-18044; AD 2014-25-03]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500
series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports from multiple
operators that have found fatigue cracking in the corners of the
forward galley service doorway. This AD requires repetitive inspections
for any cracking of the skin and bear strap doublers in the corners of
the forward galley service doorway, and corrective action if necessary.
This AD also provides optional terminating actions for certain
repetitive inspections. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
fatigue cracking, which could result in rapid loss of cabin pressure.

DATES: This AD is effective January 16, 2015.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of January 16,
2015.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0057; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nenita Odesa, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-
627-5234; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. The
NPRM published in the Federal Register on February 25, 2014 (79 FR
10429). The NPRM was prompted by reports from multiple operators that
have found fatigue cracking of the skin and bear strap in the corners
of the forward galley service doorway. Some of the reported cracks were
found outside of areas of directed or recommended inspections, or in
areas modified as specified in previous revisions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1116. Some airplanes were found to have
multiple cracks in the corner areas. The NPRM proposed to require
repetitive inspections for any cracking of the skin and bear strap
doublers in the corners of the forward galley service doorway, and
corrective action if necessary. The NPRM also proposed to provide
optional terminating actions for certain repetitive inspections. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking, which could
result in rapid loss of cabin pressure.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM (79
FR 10429, February 25, 2014) and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Clarify Terminating Action for Initial Inspection

    Southwest Airlines (Southwest) requested that the NPRM (79 FR
10429, February 25, 2014) be revised to include provisions in paragraph
(i)(1) of the proposed AD for terminating the requirement proposed by
paragraph (g) of the proposed AD for initial inspections in the areas
of the upper aft corner that are covered by the repair. Southwest noted
that paragraph (i)(1) of the proposed AD provides for terminating the
repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g) of the AD. Southwest
also stated that it would like clarification on whether accomplishment
of a repair also terminates the initial inspection requirements of
paragraph (g) of the proposed AD for the upper aft corner.
    We agree to revise paragraph (i)(1) of this AD. Notes in the tables
of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1116, Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013, state that
accomplishing certain repairs terminates repetitive inspections in the
areas covered by the repair. We have determined that accomplishing the
repair as required by paragraph (i)(1) of this AD would also terminate
the initial inspection requirement for that repaired corner. We have
coordinated this issue with Boeing and revised paragraph (i)(1) of this
AD to terminate the initial inspection requirement as well. We have
also revised paragraphs (i)(2) and (i)(3) of this AD accordingly.

Request To Add a Repair as a Method of Compliance

    Southwest requested that paragraph (i) of the proposed AD (79 FR
10429, February 25, 2014), be revised to specifically provide for
repairs accomplished using information from certain repair procedures
specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4,
dated September 30, 2013, and to allow accomplishment of those repairs
as terminating action for the inspection requirements of paragraph (g)
of the proposed AD. Southwest also requested an additional provision to
allow Repair 2 of section 53-10-01 of the Boeing 737-300/-500
Structural Repair Manual as terminating action for the initial and
repetitive inspections proposed in paragraph (g) of the proposed AD.
    We partially agree with the request. Certain repair procedures are
addressed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4,
dated September 30, 2013, as possible methods of corrective action or
preventative modification. Provisions for these repair procedures are
provided in paragraphs (i)(2) and (i)(3) of this AD. However, Repair 2
of section 53-10-01 of the Boeing 737-300/-500 Structural Repair Manual
was not addressed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1116,
Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013, or considered during development
of this AD. We do not consider that delaying this action until the
manufacturer revises the service

information to include the information in Repair 2 is warranted. To
delay this action would be inappropriate since we have determined that
an unsafe condition exists and that actions required by this AD must be
conducted to ensure continued safety. Operators may apply for an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC) under the requirements of
paragraph (m) of this AD.

Request To Revise Credit Paragraph

    Southwest noted that paragraph (k) of the proposed AD (79 FR 10429,
February 25, 2014), gives credit for inspections of the upper corners
of the forward galley doors, provided that the preventative
modification is also inspected in accordance with the requirements of
paragraph (g) of the proposed AD. Southwest also noted that paragraph
(k) of the proposed AD does not specifically mention whether credit is
given for previous repairs that were accomplished using the specified
service information or explain how these repairs affect compliance with
the initial inspection requirements of paragraph (g) of the AD.
    We agree to clarify the intent of paragraph (k) of this AD. If any
inspection of the upper corners of the forward galley service door was
accomplished before the effective date of this AD using any of the
service information identified in paragraphs (k)(1), (k)(2), (k)(3),
and (k)(4) of this AD instead of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1116, Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013, those inspections are
considered acceptable for compliance with certain requirements of
paragraph (g) of this AD. Certain modifications specified in those
previous service bulletins that were previously determined to be
terminating action for inspections, have now been determined to need
further inspection in accordance with paragraph (g) of this AD and
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4, dated September
30, 2013. Paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this AD address repairs of
the upper corners and clarify that accomplishing the repairs terminates
the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD for the inspections of the
repaired area. Repetitive inspections specified in paragraph (g) of
this AD are required and are only terminated if optional terminating
action specified in paragraph (i) of this AD is done. We have not
changed the AD in this regard.

Request To Accommodate Certain AMOCs

    Southwest noted that Note 14 in the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4, dated September
30, 2013, specifies that inspections as given in that service bulletin
for the upper forward corner are not necessary in the repaired area if,
among other conditions, ``the repair has been approved as an
Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOC) to AD 2008-11-04.'' Southwest
pointed out that AD 2008-11-04, Amendment 39-15526 (73 FR 29421, May
21, 2008), has been superseded by AD 2014-05-21, Amendment 39-17794 (79
FR 14992, March 18, 2014), and requests that Note 14 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1116, Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013, also apply to repairs
approved as an AMOC to AD 2014-05-21.
    We partially agree with Southwest's request. We cannot revise
Boeing's service information. However, we have added paragraph (j)(3)
to this AD to provide an exception to Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1116, Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013, and allow a Boeing-
provided repair that has been approved as an AMOC to AD 2014-05-21,
Amendment 39-17794 (79 FR 14992, March 18, 2014), for the repaired area
only, provided the approval was made before the effective date of this
AD and the repair doubler covers the doorway upper forward corner and
the upper hinge cutout.

Effect of Winglets on This AD

    Aviation Partners Boeing stated that accomplishing the supplemental
type certificate (STC) ST01219SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/
Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/
ebd1cec7b301293e86257cb30045557a/$FILE/ST01219SE.pdf) does not affect
the actions specified in the NPRM (79 FR 10429, February 25, 2014).
    We concur with the commenter. We have redesignated paragraph (c) of
the NPRM (79 FR 10429, February 25, 2014) as (c)(1) and added new
paragraph (c)(2) to this final rule to state that installation of STC
ST01219SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/
rgstc.nsf/0/ebd1cec7b301293e86257cb30045557a/$FILE/ST01219SE.pdf) does
not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by this final
rule. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01219SE is installed, a
``change in product'' alternative method of compliance (AMOC) approval
request is not necessary to comply with the requirements of 14 CFR
39.17.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (79 FR 10429, February 25, 2014) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 10429, February 25, 2014).
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 419 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Action                      Labor cost              Parts cost          Cost per product                 Cost on U.S. operators
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection......................  19 work-hours x $85 per   None...............  $1,615 per inspection    $676,685 per inspection cycle.
                                   hour = $1,615 per                              cycle.
                                   inspection cycle.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for any on-condition actions specified in this AD. We
have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need this
repair.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in
more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2014-25-03 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18044 ; Docket No. FAA-
2014-0057; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-210-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective January 16, 2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    (1) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -
200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes, certificated in any
category, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1116, Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013.
    (2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST01219SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/
rgstc.nsf/0/ebd1cec7b301293e86257cb30045557a/$FILE/ST01219SE.pdf)
does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by
this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01219SE is
installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with the
requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports from multiple operators that
have found fatigue cracking in the corners of the forward galley
service doorway. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
fatigue cracking, which could result in rapid loss of cabin
pressure.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspections and Corrective Actions for Groups 1 Through 4 Airplanes

    For Groups 1 through 4 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013:
Within the applicable compliance times specified in Tables 1 through
10 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013, except
as provided by paragraph (j)(1) and (j)(3) of this AD, do the
applicable detailed and low frequency eddy current inspections for
any cracking of the skin and bear straps in the corners of the
forward galley service door, and do all applicable corrective
actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4, dated
September 30, 2013, except as required by paragraph (j)(2) of this
AD. Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight.
Repeat the inspections at the applicable time specified in Tables 1
through 10 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013.

(h) Inspections and Corrective Actions for Group 5 Airplanes

    For Group 5 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013: Within
120 days after the effective date of this AD, do inspections of the
skin and bear straps and all applicable corrective actions using a
method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (m) of this AD.

(i) Optional Terminating Actions

    (1) For Groups 1 and 2 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013:
Accomplishment of a repair before the effective date of this AD in
the upper aft corner of the forward galley service doorway, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of any service
information specified in paragraphs (i)(1)(i) through (i)(1)(iv) of
this AD, terminates the inspections required by paragraph (g) of
this AD for that repaired doorway corner only.
    (i) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1116, dated July 21, 1988.
    (ii) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1116, Revision 1, dated
September 7, 1989.
    (iii) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1116, Revision 2, dated
September 30, 1993.
    (iv) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1116, Revision 3, dated July
27, 1995.
    (2) For Group 2 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013, on which
no repair or modification was done using any of the service
information identified in paragraphs (i)(2)(i) through (i)(2)(iv) of
this AD; and for Group 3 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013:
Repairing or modifying the upper aft corner of the forward galley
service doorway, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4, dated
September 30, 2013, terminates the inspections required by paragraph
(g) of this AD for that repaired or modified doorway corner only.
    (i) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1116, dated July 21, 1988.
    (ii) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1116, Revision 1, dated
September 7, 1989.
    (iii) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1116, Revision 2, dated
September 30, 1993.
    (iv) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1116, Revision 3, dated July
27, 1995.
    (3) For Groups 2 and 3 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013:
Repairing or modifying the lower forward or lower aft corner of the
forward galley service doorway, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1116, Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013, terminates the
inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD for that repaired
or modified doorway corner only.

(j) Exceptions to the Service Information

    (1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4,
dated September 30, 2013, specifies a compliance time ``after

the Revision 4 date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires
compliance within the specified compliance time ``after the
effective date of this AD.''
    (2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4,
dated September 30, 2013, specifies to contact Boeing for repair
instructions: Before further flight, repair the cracking using a
method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (m) of this AD.
    (3) Note 14 of paragraph 3.A., ``General Information'' in the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1116, Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013, states that
inspections as given in that service bulletin are not required for
the upper forward corner if there is a Boeing-provided repair which
has been approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) to
AD 2008-11-04, Amendment 39-15526 (73 FR 29421, May 21, 2008). This
AD also does not require inspections for the upper forward corner
given in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4,
dated September 30, 2013, if there is a Boeing-provided repair
approved as an AMOC to the corresponding requirements of AD 2014-05-
21, Amendment 39-17794 (79 FR 14992, March 18, 2014), for the
repaired area only, provided the approval was made before the
effective date of this AD and the repair doubler covers the doorway
upper forward corner and the upper hinge cutout.

(k) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for the inspections of the upper
corners of the forward galley service doors specified in paragraph
(g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using any of the service information identified in
paragraphs (k)(1) through (k)(4) of this AD (which are not
incorporated by reference in this AD), provided that any
preventative modification installed using this service information
is inspected in accordance with paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (1) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1116, dated July 21, 1988.
    (2) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1116, Revision 1, dated
September 7, 1989.
    (3) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1116, Revision 2, dated
September 30, 1993.
    (4) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1116, Revision 3, dated July
27, 1995.

(l) Post-Repair Inspections

    The post-repair inspections specified in Table 11 of paragraph
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1116,
Revision 4, dated September 30, 2013, are not required by this AD.
    Note 1 to paragraph (l) of this AD: The post-repair inspections
specified in Table 11 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4, dated September 30,
2013, may be used in support of compliance with section
121.1109(c)(2) or 129.109(b)(2) of the Federal Aviation Regulations
(14 CFR 121.1109(c)(2) or 14 CFR 129.109(b)(2)).

(m) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance
with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or
local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (n) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair
must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval
must specifically refer to this AD.

(n) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Nenita Odesa,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
CA 90712-4137; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(o) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1116, dated July 21, 1988.
    (ii) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1116, Revision 1, dated
September 7, 1989. Pages 20, 21, and 22 are dated July 21, 1988.
    (iii) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1116, Revision 2, dated
September 30, 1993.
    (iv) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1116, Revision 3, dated July
27, 1995.
    (v) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1116, Revision 4, dated
September 30, 2013.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 28, 2014.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-28926 Filed 12-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: March 7, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 44)]
[Notices]
[Page 10207-10208]
[DOCID:fr07mr07-94]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12611-000]

Verdant Power, Inc.; Notice of Scoping Meetings and Site Visit
and Soliciting Scoping Comments

March 1, 2007.
    a. Type of Application to be Filed: Original Major License.
    b. Project No.: 12611-000.
    c. Anticipated Filing Date: September 30, 2007.
    d. Submitted By: Verdant Power, Inc.
    e. Name of Project: Roosevelt Island Tidal Energy Project.
    f. Location: In the East River, in New York, New York. The project
would not occupy federal land.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Ron F. Smith, Verdant Power, Inc., 4640
13th Street, North Arlington, VA 22207,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    i. FERC Contact: Tom Dean,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    j. We are asking federal, state, local, and tribal agencies with
jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect to environmental
issues to cooperate with us in the preparation of the environmental
document. Currently, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency have requested cooperating agency
status. Other agencies who would like to request cooperating status
should follow the instructions for filing comments described in
paragraph k below. Cooperating agencies should note the Commission's
policy that agencies that cooperate in the preparation of the
environmental document cannot also intervene. See, 94 FERC ] 61,076
(2001).
    k. Deadline for requesting cooperating agency status or filing
scoping comments: April 30, 2007.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.
    Scoping comments and requests for cooperating agency status may be
filed

electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. The Commission
strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)
and the instructions on the Commission's Web site (http://www.ferc.gov)

under the ``efiling'' link.
    l. The proposed project would consist of: (1) Up to 300 5-meter-
diameter kinetic hydropower axial flow turbine generator units (about
33 kW each) with a total installed capacity of 10 MW mounted on
monopiles; (2) underwater power cables from each unit to a central
control room; and (3) appurtenant facilities.
    m. A copy of the Scoping Document is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site (http://www.ferc.gov), using the ``eLibrary''

link. Enter the docket number, excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-
866-208-3676, or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Copies are also available for
inspection and reproduction at the address in paragraph h.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp
 to be notified via e-mail of new filing and issuances

related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    n. Although our current intent is to prepare an environmental
assessment (EA), there is the possibility that an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) will be required. Nevertheless, this meeting will
satisfy the NEPA scoping requirements, irrespective of whether an EA or
EIS is issued by the Commission.

Scoping Meetings

    Commission staff will hold two scoping meetings in the vicinity of
the project at the times and places noted below. The daytime meeting
will focus on resource agency, Indian tribes, and non-governmental
organization concerns, while the evening meeting is primarily for
receiving input from the public. We invite all interested individuals,
organizations, and agencies to attend these meetings, to assist staff
in identifying particular study needs, as well as the scope of
environmental issues to be addressed in the environmental document.
    Many environmental issues have already been identified (i.e.
potential effects on fish population and movement, diving birds,
recreational opportunities), studies to assess those issues have
already been developed and some are ongoing. Commission staff are
particularly interested in identifying any new issues (those not
identified in the Scoping Document), or previously identified issues
that are not being addressed. The times and locations of these meetings
are as follows:

Evening Scoping Meeting

    Date and Time: Wednesday, March 28, 2007, 7 p.m. (EST)
    Location: Community Center Building, 8 River Road, Roosevelt
Island, NY 10044.

Daytime Scoping Meeting

    Date and Time: Thursday, March 29, 2007, 10 a.m. (EST)
    Location: Community Center Building, 8 River Road, Roosevelt
Island, NY 10044.
    The Community Center Building is a low rise separate building
located west (towards Manhattan) of Gristedes supermarket set back
behind the brick highrise buildings near the west channel.
    The Scoping Document, which outlines the subject areas to be
addressed in the environmental document, was mailed to the individuals
and entities on the Commission's mailing list. Copies of the Scoping
Document will be available at the scoping meetings, or may be viewed on
the web at http://www.ferc.gov, using the ``eLibrary'' link. In the

event substantive comments are received and revisions are necessary,
the Commission will prepare a revised Scoping Document for
distribution.

Site Visit

    Verdant will conduct a site visit at the project site on Wednesday,
March 28, 2007, starting at 2 p.m. All participants should meet at
Verdant's control room located in a large beige metal cargo container
box along side of the east channel of the East River of the 600 block
of Main Street on Roosevelt Island. All participants are responsible
for their own transportation.

Scoping Meeting Objectives

    At the scoping meetings, staff will: (1) Present a proposed list of
issues to be addressed in the EA; (2) identify the proposed studies;
(3) solicit from the meeting participants all available information,
especially quantifiable data, on the resources at issue; (4) encourage
statements from experts and the public on issues that should be
analyzed in the EA; (5) determine the resource issues to be addressed
in the EA; and (6) identify those issues that require a detailed
analysis, as well as those issues that do not require a detailed
analysis.
    Meeting participants should come prepared to discuss their issues
and/or concerns. Please review the Scoping Document in preparation for
the scoping meetings.

Scoping Meeting Procedures

    The meetings will be recorded by a stenographer and will become
part of the formal Commission record on the project.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3996 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Name:           YORIO CHARLES
Title:
Organization:   ACORDIA WELLS FARGO
Date:           20020916
Address1:
Address2:
City:           PITTSBURGH
State:          PA
Zip Code:       15222
Docket Number:  S030
Exhibit Number: 3-10
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Notice of intent to establish Negotiated Rulemaking Committee; request for nominees and comments.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is announcing its intent to establish a Cranes and Derricks Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee (C-DAC) under the Negotiated Rulemaking Act (NRA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA).  The Committee will negotiate issues associated with the development of a proposed revision of the existing construction safety standards for the cranes and derricks portion (1926.550) of 29 CFR 1926 Subpart N - Cranes, Derricks, Hoists, Elevators, and Conveyors.  The Committee will include representatives of parties who would be significantly affected by the final rule.  OSHA solicits comments on the initiative and requests interested parties to nominate representatives for membership on C-DAC.

Please note that you may not attach materials such as studies or journal articles to your electronic comments.  If you wish to include such materials, you must submit three copies to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. S-030, US Department of Labor, Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210.

If you wish to submit a nomination or comment online, you may enter it into the box below.  If you are submitting a nomination, please read the Federal Register notice for a list of what is needed to complete the application.  Online comments or nominations must be received by September 16, 2002.

1)Applicant name: Charles Yorio representing the insurance field.2) Evidence of representation: The interest that I will represent is the insurance field. Acordia  (Wells Fargo) is a large national insurance broker with over 100 offices in the U. S.  As an national broker we represent and have natural, unbiased relationships with all of the large commercial insurance companies. These companies include but are not limited to Zurich, AIG, St Paul, CNA, Liberty Mutual, Royal Sun Alliance, Travelers etc. For most companies operating in the US, insurance and related costs are the second highest expense. The impact the crane losses have on companies create such an exposure that limits the market and competition, making it difficult for companies who use cranes to bid economically.3) Personal Qualifications: I have a B.S. Degree in the safety sciences from Indiana university OF Pennsylvania.  A 1983 Cum Laude graduate. I have worked for 3 major insurance carriers since 1984 and 2 large brokers. I have been with Acordia ( A Wells Fargo company) since 1996. My primary function is to provide professional loss control services to industry and construction clients. I have worked with the two largest crane rental companies ( Maxim and All Crane) and large contractors.  I am a CSP ( Certified Safety Professional) and ARM ( Associate Risk Manager). Written committmnet: I commit to actively participate in good faith in the development of the rule.Resume:Charles Yorio Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>EXPERIENCEInitiate, coordinate and provide customer focused loss control service for large and medium manufacturing, healthcare, construction.  Develop and implement written loss control programs for accident prevention and regulatory compliance.  Participate in sales and stewardship presentations.EMPLOYERS INCLUDE:10/95 to Present:  ACORDIA (A Wells Fargo Company)Assistant Vice President, Loss Control10/91 to 10/95 : AON Risk Services Pittsburgh, PA                  SENIOR  LOSS CONTROL SPECIALIST    7/87 to 10/91  : NORTHBROOK INSURANCE CO. Pittsburgh, PA                       SENIOR LOSS CONTROL REPRESENTATIVE12/85 to 7/87   : AETNA LIFE AND CASUALTY  Pittsburgh, PA                       ENGINEERING REPRESENTATIVE12/84 to 12/85  : AMERICAN MUTUAL INSURANCE  Rahway, NJ                       LOSS CONTROL REPRESENTATIVE                        EDUCATIONBachelor of Science Degree, SAFETY SCIENCES, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 1983. Graduated CUM LAUDE. 3.63 GPA in Major.Conducted training and Obtained various construction safety certificates (Mobile Crane, OSHA 500, Subpart R)  SAMPLE PROFESSIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS*Achieved Associate in Risk Management Designation (1998)*Invited to speak at local and national conferences.*Named to TQM training committee (1990 & 1994)*Achieved Certified Safety Professional Designation (1990)*Developed training modules used country wide.*Recognized several times for both quality and production.*Produced safety training videos (1993, 2000).*Wrote and implemented several construction safety programs.*Participate on USX contractor safety committee.*Awarded Professional Member Indiana University of PA, Academic Fraternity (2001.SKILLSSAFETY  *Accident analysis*Safety Program evaluation, development and implementation*Ergonomic evaluations utilizing NIOSH Formula*Management motivation and training*Training program research and development*Incentive Program developmentREGULATORY COMPLIANCE CONSULTATION*Working knowledge of OSHA, NFPA and DOT standards.*Develop and implement compliance programs.FLEET SAFETY*Program evaluation and development.*Conduct professional truck driver training courses.GENERAL LIABILITY*Risk transfer consultation*Product liability claim defense evaluation


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7445-7446]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02490]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0833; Airspace Docket No. 19-ASW-13]
RIN 2120-AA66

Revocation and Amendment of the Class E Airspace; Mansfield, LA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends the Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface at C E `Rusty' Williams Airport, Mansfield,
LA. This action is due to an airspace review caused by the
decommissioning of the Mansfield non-directional radio beacon (NDB)
which provided navigation information for the instrument procedures at
this airport. The name and geographic coordinates of C E `Rusty'
Williams Airport would also be updated to coincide with the FAA's
aeronautical database.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, May 21, 2020. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under Title 1
Code of Federal Regulations part 51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://

www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11D at NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface at C E `Rusty' Williams Airport, Mansfield, LA, to support
instrument flight rule operations at this airport.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (84 FR 65038; November 26, 2019) for Docket No. FAA-2019-0833
to amend the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface at C E `Rusty' Williams Airport, Mansfield, LA. Interested
parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments
were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.11D, dated August 8, 2019, and effective September 15,
2019, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and effective September 15,
2019. FAA Order 7400.11D is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11D lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by amending the Class E airspace area extending upward from 700
feet above the surface to within a 6.4-mile radius (decreased from a
6.5-mile radius) at C E `Rusty' Williams Airport, Mansfield, LA;
removing the city associated with the airport to comply with changes to
FAA Order 7400.2M, Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters; removing
the Mansfield RBN and associated extension from the airspace legal
description; and updating the name and geographic coordinates of the C
E `Rusty' Williams Airport (previously DeSoto Parish Airport) to
coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database.
    These actions are the result of an airspace review caused by the
decommissioning of the Mansfield NDB, which provided navigation
information for the instrument procedures at this airport.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected
to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and
effective September 15, 2019, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASW LA E5 Mansfield, LA [Amended]

C E `Rusty' Williams Airport, LA
    (Lat. 32[deg]04'22'' N, long. 93[deg]45'56'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within 6.4-mile radius of the C E `Rusty' Williams Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on February 3, 2020.
Marty Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2020-02490 Filed 2-7-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11233-11234]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05178]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2017-0022; OMB No. 1660-0004]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Application for Participation in the National
Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites
the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity
to comment on a reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved
information collection for which approval has expired. FEMA will submit
the information collection abstracted below to the Office of Management
and Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The submission will describe
the nature of the information collection, the categories of
respondents, the estimated burden (i.e., the time, effort and resources
used by respondents to respond) and cost, and the actual data
collection instruments FEMA will use.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before April 13, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the proposed information
collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the Desk
Officer for the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and sent via electronic mail to
[email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection should be made to Director,
Information Management Division, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,
email address [email protected] or
Adrienne L. Sheldon, Supervisory Emergency Management Specialist,
Floodplain Management Division,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP),
codified at 42 U.S.C 4001, et seq., requires all flood prone
communities throughout the country to apply for participation in the
NFIP one year after their flood prone status is identified or submit to
the prohibition of certain types of federal and federally-related
financial assistance for use in their floodplains. Title 44 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) section 59.2 authorizes previously
unavailable flood insurance protection to property owners in flood-
prone areas, and 44 CFR 59.22 identifies the information that
communities are required to submit to FEMA for application into the
NFIP. 44 CFR 59.22 and 59.24 identify the information a community is
required to submit to FEMA for continued participation in the program.
    This proposed information collection previously published in the
Federal Register on December 13, 2017 at 82 FR 58631 with a 60 day
public comment period. No comments were received. This information
collection expired on September 30, 2017. FEMA is requesting a
reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved information
collection for which approval has expired. The purpose of this notice
is to notify the public that FEMA will submit the information
collection abstracted below to the Office of Management and Budget for
review and clearance.

Collection of Information

    Title: Application for Participation in the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP).
    Type of information collection: Reinstatement, without change, of a
previously approved collection for which approval has expired.
    OMB Number: 1660-0004.
    Form Titles and Numbers: FEMA Form 086-0-30, Application for
Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program.
    Abstract: The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) provides
flood insurance to the communities that apply for participation and
make a commitment to protect against future flood damages. The
application form and supporting documentation will enable FEMA to
continue to rapidly process new community applications and to thereby
more quickly provide flood insurance protection to the residents in
communities.
    To qualify for the NFIP, a participating community must adopt
certain minimum standards in accordance with FEMA's regulations at 44
CFR 60.3, 60.4, and 60.5. In order to verify whether communities
maintain such standards, the NFIP requires participating communities to
retain documentation on development taking place in the flood hazard
areas within the community. 44 CFR 59.22. Such information will be made
available to FEMA upon request. This information assists FEMA in
evaluating the effectiveness of a community's floodplain management
program and participating property owners' eligibility for flood
insurance.
    This reinstatement does not propose any change in the information
solicited from respondents through this information collection;
however, the number of burden hours has been updated to reflect
changing number of respondents and responses received through this
collection over time. These changes have occurred naturally, and do not
result from specific action taken by FEMA.
    The ``Application for Participation in the NFIP'' and the ``NFIP
and the Community Development Permit Process'' are separate actions
documented under the same collection.
    Affected Public: State, local or Tribal government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 22,367.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 97,724.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 244,418.
    Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost: $20,946,623.
    Estimated Respondents' Operation and Maintenance Costs: N/A.
    Estimated Respondents' Capital and Start-Up Costs: N/A.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost to the Federal Government: $ 83,041.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

    Dated: March 7, 2018.
William H. Holzerland,
Senior Director for Information Management, Office of the Chief
Administrative Officer, Mission Support, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2018-05178 Filed 3-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 43 (Wednesday, March 4, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12790-12792]
[FR Doc No: 2020-04461]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0601]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Current Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations for
Medicated Feeds

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, and
to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the notice. This
notice solicits comments on the recordkeeping requirements for
manufacturers of medicated animal feeds.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by May 4, 2020.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be considered. Electronic comments
must be submitted on or before May 4, 2020. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of May 4, 2020. Comments received by
mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are postmarked or the delivery service
acceptance receipt is on or before that date.

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2010-N-0601 for ``Current Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations
for Medicated Feeds.'' Received comments, those filed in a timely
manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between
9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amber Sanford, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on

respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of information
technology.

Current Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations for Medicated Feeds--21
CFR Part 225

OMB Control Number 0910-0152--Extension

    Under section 501 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C
Act) (21 U.S.C. 351), FDA has the statutory authority to issue current
good manufacturing practice (cGMP) regulations for drugs, including
medicated feeds. Medicated feeds are administered to animals for the
prevention, cure, mitigation, or treatment of disease, or growth
promotion and feed efficiency. Statutory requirements for cGMPs have
been codified under part 225 (21 CFR part 225). Medicated feeds that
are not manufactured in accordance with these regulations are
considered adulterated under section 501(a)(2)(B) of the FD&C Act.
Under part 225, a manufacturer is required to establish, maintain, and
retain records for a medicated feed, including records to document
procedures required during the manufacturing process to assure that
proper quality control is maintained. Such records would, for example,
contain information concerning receipt and inventory of drug
components, batch production, laboratory assay results (i.e., batch and
stability testing), labels, and product distribution.
    This information is needed so that FDA can monitor drug usage and
possible misformulation of medicated feeds to investigate violative
drug residues in products from treated animals and to investigate
product defects when a drug is recalled. In addition, FDA will use the
cGMP criteria in part 225 to determine whether or not the systems and
procedures used by manufacturers of medicated feeds are adequate to
assure that their feeds meet the requirements of the FD&C Act as to
safety, and also that they meet their claimed identity, strength,
quality, and purity, as required by section 501(a)(2)(B) of the FD&C
Act.
    A license is required when the manufacturer of a medicated feed
involves the use of a drug or drugs that FDA has determined requires
more control because of the need for a withdrawal period before
slaughter or because of carcinogenic concerns. Conversely, a license is
not required, and the recordkeeping requirements are less demanding for
those medicated feeds for which FDA has determined that the drugs used
in their manufacture need less control. Respondents to this collection
of information are commercial feed mills and mixer/feeders.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                                     Table 1--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden
                                                     [Registered licensed commercial feed mills] \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    Number of
                 21 CFR section                     Number of      records per    Total annual      Average  burden per  recordkeeping      Total hours
                                                  recordkeepers   recordkeeper       records
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
225.42(b)(5) through (8) requires records of                825             260         214,500  1......................................         214,500
 receipt, storage, and inventory control of
 medicated feeds.
225.58(c) and (d) requires records of the                   825              45          37,125  0.50 (30 minutes)......................       18,562.50
 results of periodic assays for medicated feeds
 that are in accord with label specifications
 and also those medicated feeds not within
 documented permissible assay limits.
225.80(b)(2) requires that verified medicated               825           1,600       1,320,000  0.12 (7 minutes).......................         158,400
 feed label(s) be kept for 1 year.
225.102(b)(1) through (5), requires records of              825           7,800       6,435,000  0.08 (5 minutes).......................         514,800
 master record files and production records for
 medicated feeds.
225.110(b)(1) and (2) requires maintenance of               825           7,800       6,435,000  0.02 (1 minute)........................         128,700
 distribution records for medicated feeds.
225.115(b)(1) and (2) requires maintenance of               825               5           4,125  0.12 (7 minutes).......................             495
 complaint files by the medicated feed
 manufacturer.
                                                --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total......................................  ..............  ..............  ..............  .......................................    1,035,457.50
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

                                                     Table 2--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden
                                                         [Registered licensed mixer/feeders] \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Number of
                21 CFR section                    Number of      records per    Total annual        Average burden per recordkeeping        Total hours
                                                recordkeepers   recordkeeper       records
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
225.42(b)(5) through (8) requires records of              100             260          26,000  0.15 (9 minutes).........................           3,900
 receipt, storage, and inventory control of
 medicated feeds.
225.58(c) and (d) requires records of the                 100              36           3,600  0.50 (30 minutes)........................           1,800
 results of periodic assays for medicated
 feeds that are in accord with label
 specifications and also those medicated
 feeds not within documented permissible
 assay limits.
225.80(b)(2) requires that verified medicated             100              48           4,800  0.12 (7 minutes).........................             576
 feed label(s) be kept for 1 year.

225.102(b)(1) through (5) requires records of             100             260          26,000  0.40 (24 minutes)........................          10,400
 master record files and production records
 for medicated feeds.
                                              ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total....................................  ..............  ..............  ..............  .........................................          16,676
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

                                                     Table 3--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden
                                                  [Nonregistered unlicensed commercial feed mills] \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Number of
                21 CFR section                    Number of      records per    Total annual       Average  burden per  recordkeeping       Total hours
                                                recordkeepers   recordkeeper       records
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
225.142 requires procedures for                         4,186               4          16,744  1........................................          16,744
 identification, storage, and inventory
 control (receipt and use) of Type A
 medicated articles and Type B medicated
 feeds.
225.158 requires records of investigation and           4,186               1           4,186  4........................................          16,744
 corrective action when the results of
 laboratory assays of drug components
 indicate that the medicated feed is not in
 accord with the permissible assay limits.
225.180 requires identification, storage, and           4,186              96         401,856  0.12 (7 minutes).........................          48,223
 inventory control of labeling in a manner
 that prevents label mix-ups and assures that
 correct labels are used for medicated feeds.
225.202 requires records of formulation,                4,186             260       1,088,360  0.65 (39 minutes)........................         707,434
 production, and distribution of medicated
 feeds.
                                              ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total....................................  ..............  ..............  ..............  .........................................         789,145
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

                                                     Table 4--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden
                                                      [Nonregistered unlicensed mixer/feeders] \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Number of
                21 CFR section                    Number of      records per    Total annual       Average  burden per  recordkeeping       Total hours
                                                recordkeepers   recordkeeper       records
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
225.142 requires procedures for                         3,400               4          13,600  1........................................          13,600
 identification, storage, and inventory
 control (receipt and use) of Type A
 medicated articles and Type B medicated
 feeds.
225.158 requires records of investigation and           3,400               1           3,400  4........................................          13,600
 corrective action when the results of
 laboratory assays of drug components
 indicate that the medicated feed is not in
 accord with the permissible assay limits.
225.180 requires identification, storage, and           3,400              32         108,800  0.12 (7 minutes).........................          13,056
 inventory control of labeling in a manner
 that prevents label mix-ups and assures that
 correct labels are used for medicated feeds.
225.202 requires records of formulation,                3,400             260         884,000  0.33 (20 minutes)........................         291,720
 production, and distribution of medicated
 feeds.
                                              ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total....................................  ..............  ..............  ..............  .........................................         331,976
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Our estimated burden for the information collection reflects a
decrease of 65,265.20 hours. We attribute this adjustment to a decrease
in the number of respondents for Registered Licensed Commercial Feed
Mills. Medicated Feed Mill licensing is voluntary. Firms may withdraw
if they go out of business or if they change the source of the drug and
a license is not required.

    Dated: February 27, 2020.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-04461 Filed 3-3-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P