--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TO:	Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

FROM:	Ryan Novak, ERG

DATE:	September 30, 2015

SUBJECT:	Index for Supporting Documentation for the Lick Creek/White River, IN Case Study Model (DCN SE05592)

This document serves as the index for the supporting documentation for the Lick Creek/White River, IN Case Study Model, developed as part of the Environmental Assessment for the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category (EA Report), Document No. EPA-821-R-15-006 (DCN SE04527). The supporting documentation for this case study includes the files listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Supporting Documentation for the Lick Creek/White River, IN Case Study Model
                                 Attachment ID
                                 Document Name
                               Brief Description
                                      A1
Attachment 1: Pollutant Loadings and Design Workbook - SE05592A1
Documentation of the modeling scope, design, steam electric power plant loadings, STORET monitoring data, and DMR/TRI point source loadings evaluated for the Lick Creek/White River, IN case study model. Refer to the `ReadMe' tab of the workbook for additional information about the contents of each tab.
                                      A2
Attachment 2: WASP Model Input and Output Files - SE05592A2
These files represent the WASP model input and output files for the Lick Creek/White River, IN case study model. The WASP input file (.wif) for each pollutant and scenario represents the settings and inputs used to execute case study modeling. The output data represent the daily water column and sediment concentrations in each segment of the WASP model, for each pollutant, for baseline and each regulatory option.
                                      A3
Attachment 3: Water Quality Benchmark Exceedance Analysis - SE05592A3
The water quality analysis for the Lick Creek/White River, IN case study model. These results were generated by running a script on the raw WASP model output (see Attachment 2). The output from this script indicates the percent of daily average concentrations that each segment exceeded the water quality benchmarks and CSCL sediment benchmarks evaluated in the EA.
                                      A4
Attachment 4: Wildlife and Human Health Impacts Analysis - SE05592A4
The wildlife and human health analysis for the Lick Creek/White River, IN case study model. This workbook includes the annual average water column concentration output, generated by the WASP model, that were evaluated against the threshold concentrations determined to trigger wildlife or human health benchmark exceedances.


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 237 (Friday, December 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77030-77032]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31633]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-65893; File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2011-92]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Amex LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Specifying in Its
Rules an Existing Policy Related to the Application of NYSE Amex
Options Rule 935NY

December 5, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on November 23, 2011, NYSE Amex LLC (the ``Exchange'' or ``NYSE
Amex'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit

comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to specify in its rules an existing policy
related to the application of NYSE Amex Options Rule 935NY. The text of
the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, at http://www.nyse.com, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and at http://www.sec.gov.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to specify in its rules an existing policy
related to the application of NYSE Amex Options Rule 935NY.
    NYSE Amex Options Rule 935NY provides, in part, that Users \5\ may
not execute as principal orders they represent as agent unless agency
orders are first exposed on the Exchange for at least one second. This
requirement gives other market participants an opportunity to
participate in the execution of orders before the entering User
executes them. The Exchange recognizes, however, that because the
Exchange does not identify the User that entered an order to the NYSE
Amex System, orders from the same ATP Holder may inadvertently execute
against each other as a result of being entered by different persons
and/or systems at the same ATP Holder. Therefore, when enforcing NYSE
Amex Options Rule 935NY, the Exchange does not consider the inadvertent
interaction of orders from the same ATP Holder within one second to be
a violation of the exposure requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The term ``User'' means any ATP Holder that is authorized to
obtain access to the NYSE Amex System pursuant to NYSE Amex Options
Rule 902.1NY. See NYSE Amex Options Rule 900.2NY(87).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    When investigating potential violations of NYSE Amex Options Rule
935NY, the Exchange takes into consideration whether orders that
executed against each other within one second in the NYSE Amex System
were entered by persons, business units and/or systems at the same ATP
Holder that did not have knowledge of the order in the NYSE Amex
System.\6\ Commonly, ATP Holders are able to demonstrate that orders
were entered by individuals or systems that did not have the ability to
know of the preexisting order in the NYSE Amex System due to
information barriers in place at the time the orders were entered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA''), on behalf of the Exchange and pursuant to a Regulatory
Services Agreement (``RSA''), conducts routine surveillance to
identify instances when an order in the NYSE Amex System is executed
against an order entered by the same ATP Holder within one second.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to codify this policy in Commentary .07 to
NYSE Amex Options Rule 935NY. Proposed Commentary .07 would specify
that ATP Holders may demonstrate that orders were entered without
knowledge of a preexisting order in the NYSE Amex System represented by
the same ATP Holder by providing evidence that effective information
barriers between the persons, business units and/or systems entering
the orders on the Exchange were in existence at the time the orders
were entered. Commentary .07 would require that such information
barriers be fully documented and provided to the Exchange upon
request.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Information barrier documentation is reviewed by FINRA on
the Exchange's behalf to evaluate whether an ATP Holder has
implemented processes that are reasonably designed to prevent the
flow of pre-trade order information given the particular structure
of the ATP Holder. Additionally, information barriers are reviewed
as part of the Exchange's examination program, which is also
administered by FINRA pursuant to the RSA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
``Act''),\8\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,\9\ in particular, because it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. In
particular, the Exchange believes that codifying the Exchange's policy
that appropriate information barriers may be used to demonstrate that
the execution of two orders within one second was inadvertent because
the orders were entered without knowledge of each other, would clarify
the intent and application of NYSE Amex Options Rule 935NY for ATP
Holders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(7) of the Act,\10\ which requires the
rules of an exchange to provide a fair procedure for the disciplining
of members and persons associated with members. In particular, by
specifying that the information barriers must be fully documented for
the purpose of demonstrating that orders were entered without knowledge
that there was a pre-existing unexecuted agency or proprietary order on
the Exchange, ATP Holders would be better prepared to properly respond
to requests for information by the Exchange in the course of a
regulatory investigation. Moreover, while ATP Holders are generally
required to provide information to the Exchange as requested,
specifying that ATP Holders must provide written documentation
regarding information barriers within the context of NYSE Amex Options
Rule 935NY would require that all ATP Holders adhere to the same
standard for demonstrating compliance with NYSE Amex Options Rule
935NY.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not significantly
affect the protection of investors or the public interest, does not
impose any significant burden on competition, and, by its terms, does
not become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed,
or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has

become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2011-92 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2011-92. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2011-92 and should
be submitted on or before December 30, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-31633 Filed 12-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Rev. 3/ 31/ 01 ABATEMENT PEMIT MATERIALS Department of Health Environmental Hedh Administra@ on Lead& sed Paint Abatement Program APPENDIX P *** DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE LEAD PERMITTING AND NOTIFICATION FOR LEAD ABATEMENT PROJECTS

 District of Columbia Government Deparment of Health Risk Assessment, Remediation and CertificationDivision December 2000 *** GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTFUCT OF COLUMBIA Department of Health Environmental Health Administration Risk . tssessnient, Remediation . ind Certification Program

December 1, 2000 Dear ContractorBusiness Entity:

Please be informed that effective November 30, 1999, all contractors, consultants, and/ or business entities conducting Lead Based Paint Abatement and related services, as defined by the District of Columbia Code 6 997.1( I), within the District of Columbia are required to obtain a permit ( per District of Columbia Code 6 997.7) and pay the associated fee.

Permit applicatiodnotificationsare to be sent to the Department of Health at least ten ( 10) business days prior to conducting a Lead Based Paint Abatement project.

Please submit your applicatiodnotificationsto:

Department of Health Environmental Health Administration Bureau of Hazardous Material and Toxic Substances RiskAssessment, Remediation and Certification Program 51 N Street, N. E., 3rdFloor Washington, D. C. 20002 Attn: Mr. Alexander Okechukwu An application is enclosed for your use. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Okechukwu at ( 202) 535 2690.

Sincerely,

Richard N. Bres Program Manager Enclosure RB/ ca 51 1Street, >. E., Third Floor, \\ ashington, D. C'. 20002 TEL ( 202)  335 2690 F. iS ( 202) 533 1423 3 CERTIFICA'ITON, ACCREDITATION, TESTING, PERMl'ITING AND NOTIFICATION REOUIREMENTS .

L Inspector 24 hours ( hands on) 8 hours Risk Assessor 16 hours ( hands on) 4 hours Supervisor 32 hours ( handsa) ~

8hours Project Designer 32 ( hands on) ( Supervisor + 8 hours) worker 16 hours ( hands on) 8 hours Abatement ProjectlConunercial Yes ( storedoffices)

Inspector I Yes Fee: $ 300 Fee: $ 300 Fee: $ 300 Fee: $ 300 Fee: $ 60 SuDervisor I Project Designer No I Individud Discblines I Yes I I 1 Business I Yes Homeowner with elevated blood lead No level child Elderly * Yes Elderly with elevatedblood lead level No child I Zero Bedroom I Yes Built after 1978 I Yes Individual Disciplines YeS Individual Disciplines ( inspector, Yes supervisor, & risk assessor) * Elderly column refers to housing specificallyfor the elderly If applicant hasnot received trainingfrom a D. C. accredited provider, then a D. C. refresher will be required.

The two part: discipline exam and the D. C. specific exam arerequired. Lfit is determined that anapplicant's initialexam is equivalent to D. C.' s core exam, then only the D. C. specific exam would be required. 1 INSTRUCTIONS FOR LEAD ABATEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION AND PROJECT NOTIFICATION Per D. C. Code g 6 997.7, contractors who conduct lead based paint abatement, as defmed in D. C. Code 5 6 997.1( 1), in the District of Columbia shall obtain a permit. Permits are required for alllead based paint abatement projects, regardless of type of structure or building and size of the abatement project, Please read and follow these instructions when completing the application.

1. Please include the address of the abatement property, lot, square number, and Wad, if applicable. 2. Please check the type of notifcation. If thisis an amended notification or you wish to cancel a former notification, please indicate the Permit Number you were issuedforas project. 3. Print or type name and address of the lead abatement contractor. 4. Print or type the name and telephone number of the contractor s contact person for thisparticular project 5. Print or type the contractor s District of Columbia Business Entity certificationnumber. 6. Print or type the name of the assigned supervisor for thisproject. 7. Print or type the telephone number and beeper or cellular telephone number for the assigned supervisor. 8. Print or type the property owner ( FullName); and if Merent from the abatement address, print or type the address of the property owner. 9. Describe the present use of the property or structure; i. e., residential building, commercial building, bridge, tower, etc. 10. Print or type the approximatedate the facility/ struclurewas built. A year will suffice. 11. Print or type the approximateamount of lead based paint to be abated. 12. Print or type the type of lead abatement method to be employed; ie., removal, encapsulation, replacement, etc.. 13. Print or type the provisions for medical surveillance and worker protection. 14. Give a brief description of the areas adjacent to the abatementproject, i. e., residential housinglapartment, commercial buildings, office buildings, playground, etc. 15. Please state the intended disposal site of generated waste. If hazardous waste is generated, please describe how you intend to comply with the hazardous waste requirements of Title 20 DCMR Chaptea 40 54. 16. Please state the amount of the contract to conduct the abatement If the project involves other work thatis not considered lead based paint abatement; doEt include thataspart of the abatement contract. 17. Please state the amount of abatementpermit fee submitted. As indicated on the application, permit fee equals $ 40.00plus 3% of the abatement cost If the contract for lead abatement is for $ 2,000.00, the total permit fee equals: $ 40.00+(. 03X$ 2,000.00)=$ 40.00+$ 60.00=$ 100.00 18. Print or type the start and completion dates and the hours in which lead abatement activities will be conducted. If you are applyhg for the permit and do not know the exact start dates, you may leave thisblank and notify this office no less than 10 business days prior to the start of the project. Also provide the permit number, property address, project supervisor s name, beeper number and identify the name of the abatement contractor on the notification.

Please be sure to sign and date the application, and include the attachments that are required to be submitted. Upon review and approval of the application, a permit will be issued. The pennit will be valid only for the duration of the project or for one year, whichever is less. Any change in startor completiondateswill require aa amended notification. The permit must be maintained at the project site at all times and available upon request from the Department of Health inspectors.^^ notification must be submitted ten ( 10) business days prior to the start of the lead abatement project. Please submit  0.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADMINISTRATION BUREAU OF HAZARDOUSMATERIAL AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES LEADPOISONINGPREVENTION DIVISION 51 N STREET, N. E., 3RoFLOOR WASHINGTON, D. C. ZOO02 ATTENTION: MR ALEXANDER OKECHUKWU *** GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

1.

2.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADMINISTRATION BUREAU OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES LEAD POISONING PREVENTION DIVISION LEAD BASEDPAINT ABATEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION ANDNOTIFICATION PROPERTY LOCATION/ ADDRESS:

SQUARE # LOT # WARD#

TYPE OF NOTIFICATION: ORIGINAL AMENDED CANCEL IF NOT AN ORIGINAL NOTIFICATION, PRIOR PERMIT NUMBER ISSUED:

ABATEMENT CONTRACTOR:

ADDRESS:

CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE:

CONTACT NAME:

TELEPHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER:

CONTRACTOR S DISTRICTOF COLUMBIALEAD CERTIFICATION NUMBER:

NAME OF SUPERVISOR ASSIGNED TO THE PROJECT:

SUPERVISORS D. C. LEAD CERTIFICATION #

CONTACT NUMBER FOR ASSIGNED SUPERVISOR: TELEPHONE BEEPERKELL PHONE PROPERTY OWNER:

ADDRESSOF OWNER ( if Werent from project location)

CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE:

PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY/ STRUCTURE:

DATE THE FACILITY/ BUILDING/ STRUCTURE WAS BUILT:

APPROXIMAm AMOUNT OF LEAD BASED PAINT TO BE ABATED ( in square or linearfeet):

Square Feet: Linea Feet:

DESCRIPTION OF LEAD ABATEMENT METHODS TO BE EMPLOYED:

PROVISIONS FOR MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE AND WORKERPROTECTION 3 PAGE 2 LEAD BASED PAINT ABATEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION AND NOTIF'ICATION 14. DESCRIPTIONOF AREA@) IMMEDIATELYADJACENT TO ABATEMENT SITE:

15. LIST THE INTENDED DISPOSAL SITE OF GENERATED WASTE, AND IF HAZARDOUS WASTE IS GENERATED, PLEASE DESCRIBE THE INTENDED COMPLIANCE WITHTHE REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PRESCRIBEDBY TITLE 1L20 DCMR CHAPTERS 40 54:

16. AMOUNT OF ABATEMENT CONTRACT: $

17. AMOUNT OF LEAD ABATEMENT PERMIT FEE SUBMITTED: $

I cerhfy that the above information is accurate, true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that all lead abatement willbe conducted in accordancewith allapplicable work practice standardsof Federal andDistrict of Columbia laws. I also cerhfy that any hazardous waste generatedas a result of thisproject will be Qsposed of in compliance with the requirementsfor hazardous waste disposal as prescribedby Title 20 DCMR Chapters 40 54. Fully, I attest that only appropriatelyD. C. certified individualswillbe used for all abatementwork and that no outstanding debts are owed to the District of Columbia Government.

Signatureof ContractorEitle Date NOTE: PLEASE ENSURE THE FOLLOWG AREATTACHED WITH THISNOTIFICATION:

COPY OF CONTRACTORSDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CERTIFICATON * COPY OF CONTRACTORSCURRENT LIABILI'IY INSURANCE, INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL, E" MENTAL AND GENERAL, LIABILITY COPY OF CONTRACT FOR THE LEAD ABATEMENT PROJECT APPROPRIATE PERMIT FEE ( make check or money order payable to the D. C. Treasurer; applicationfees are non refundable) SCOPE OF WORK OFFICE USE ONLY DATE RECEIVED PROJECT PERMIT NUMBER.

LPPD APPROVAL BY: SIGNATURE: DATE:

APPROVED 0 PENDING n DENIED 0 . NOTIFICATION ASSIGNMENT FOR INSPECTION: INSPECFOR DATE:

18. START/ COMPLETIONDATE@) OF PROJECT: ( If unknown at time of permit application, you may leave blank and no@ this office no less than10business days prior to the staxt of the project: Not6cations may be faxed to Alexander Okechukwuat FAX ( 202) 535 1423.

PERMIT NUMBER: PROPERTY ADDRESS:

START DATE: COMPLETIONDATE:

WORKHOURS: FROM A. M. TO P. M.

PROJECT SUPERVISOR: BEEPER NUMBER:

CONTRACTOR NAME: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ENVlRONMENTAL HEALTH ADMlNISTRATION CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION  SUPPLEMENTAL FORM  ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE PROJECT ADDRESS: LOT: SQUARE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Note: please answer all 11 questions in this questionnaire, by checking either column   Yes  or   No  for each question. If you answer   Yes  to any Of the questions 1  IO, you should contact the correspondingofficets) indicated in column   contact persodoffice  as soon as possible. If You aqswer Yes  10 question 1I, please follow the instructions in the column   contact persodoffice . Until this application is reviewed and approved by the concerned OffiCe( s), the permit will not be issued.

SCOPE OF PROJECT 1 YES NO i1 1 Does the total cost of the project exceed $ 1 million ( based on 1989 In 2000, this cost is $ 1.380.000 This does not apply if the project is an internal renovation only and there 1i will be no change in the use of the building 2 Will the proposed use involve the construction of a facility for the handling, transfer, storage, disposal or treatment of solid waste, medical waste, or recyclable materials?

undergroundstorage tank ( UST)?

4 Will the work to be performed involve theassessment or cleanup of groundwater associated with the release of rnatenals from an underground storage tank ~ usT)?

Will the proposedproject involve the installation or drilling of wells other than for the purposes stated in questions 3 and 4?

Will the proposed project involve the generation, treatment. storage, disposal or transportation of chemicals or other substances which may be considered hazardous?

Will the proposedproject involve construction which will disturb the sediment in rivers, streams or wetlands?

8 Will the work lo be performedinvolve the rostajlation. removal. abandonment, or repair of an underground storage tank ( UST) system7 , 9 Will the proposed project result in the discharge into the air of 1I ~

gases. dust, or the creation of any objectionable odors?

~ 10 Will the proposed project involve the removal, handling, transportation, disposal, or encapsulationof asbestos?

i   Please bring with you a copy of your asbestos survey, ten day notification form, and asbestos abatement permit fee 11 Was the building built before 19787 ( Lead basedpaint may be present)

AFFID OFFICE USECONTACT PERSOWOFFICE ( InitiaVDate)

( 202) 535 2289. EIS Coordinator. EHA ( 202) 535 2289.  ISCoordinator, EHA ( 202) 535 2525, UndergroundStorage Tank Division,  HA ( 202) 535 2250. Air Quality Division, EHA ( 202) 535 2525, UndergroundStorage Tank Division,  HA ( 202) 535 2190, Water Quality Division,  HA ( 202) 535 2250, Air Quality Division. EHA ( 202) 535 2190. Water Quality Division, EHA ( 202) 535 2290, Hazardous Waste Division.  HA ( 202) 535 2190, Water Quality Division.  HA ( 202) 535 2525, Underground Storage Tank Division,  HA ( 202) 535 2250, Air Quality Division. EHA ( 202) 535 2250, Air Quality Division, EHA If you answer   Yes  to this question, please answer the questions and follow the mstructionson the   Lead Hazard Control Questionnaire  to determine if you need a permit to conduct a Lead Abatement Project 1!

2 ,

1 I hereby certify that I have the authority of the owner of the property to make this application. I declare that the answers to the above questions in this Questionnaire are complete and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Signature Name ( print)

Acid ress Date Phone OFFICE USE ONLY __ __

COMMENTS AND PERMIT RESTRICTIONS:

I ~~ .

US6 RtVtRSE IF NECESSARi tHA i~ m k li 99 1300  Rev8580 36 i;! DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HIAL T1 tADMINIS  I RA I ION BUREAU OF tIAZARDO1lSMA Il< RIALAND I OXIC S[ IHSI ANCKS RISK ASSESSMENT, RI~ ME~~ IA I ION, DIVISION ( RARCI)) ANI) ( XR I IFI<~ A \  I ION LEAD t I AjrXRI) CONI RO1, QIJ EST1ON N AI RK Project Address:

Name of owner Address of owner Phone # Square # Lot # Ward #

Note: Please answer all questions by checking   YES  or   NO . If you answer   YES  to any question, contact the Risk Assessment, Remediation, and Certification Division at 5 1 N Street, N. E., 3  d Floor or call ( 202) 535 2637 for a lead abatement permit application.

AFFIDAVIT I hcrt. hv certifv that I have the authority to represent the owner of the property and to answer this questionnaire. I declare that the answers to the atxw questions are accurate, true and complete to the best of  my knowledge. FACT SHEETS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS FACTSHEET Vot. 2 No. 2 November 1998 D. C. LAW 11 221   LEAD BASED PAINT ABATEMENT AND CONTROL ACT OF 1996

SUMMARY The Environmental Health Administration, State Lead Certification and Training Program are announcing the D. C. Law I 1 21I   Lead BasedPaint Abatement and Control Act of 1996.  This law regulates the removal of lead in the District of Cdumbia and requires person@) contracted to lead hazard reduction services and related training e Workerflraining discipline fees e Abatement Project permit fees.

Work Practice standards and procedures for condudng lead based pant ha7ard redudon and related consumer outreach/ education advlties.

ENTITIES EXEMPT FROM THE LAW 0 Individuals who perform e Housing constructed after I978 PENALTIES/ FINES Entibes in wolabon of the law will be fined and/ or imprisoned pursuant to the Act.

FOR MORE INFORMATION Please contact:

D. C Department of Health Environmental Health AdministratJon Lead Poisoning Prevention Division, State Lead Certification and Training Program on 202 442 5828.

Pr be trained. certified and/ or accredited,

EFFECTIVE DATE DC Law I 1 22 I became final on January2, 1998.

WHAT IS REQUIRED? . i erson( s) engaged to remove. remodel, or renovate lead painted c> tructuresmust be trained,

( ertified and/ or accredited.

A lead abatement permit 1 i iiiit be obtained at least lo ( 1.1 i I pi lor to any iead I ~.~ luctiori dctivitiej I ldbility insurance must be I 1 ~

I !

0 lead based paint activities at residences which they own unless the residence is occupied by a non owner or non immediate family mernber( s) or a child resides or frequently visits subject property who is younger than eight years old Housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities; unless any child under the age of eight years resides. is expected to reside in orr egular lyvisits such housing Any zero bedroom unit. such ds an efficiency apartment   0 fhtained by businesses and 1 kk Assessors l . NOTICE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC LEAD BASEDPAINT ABATEMENT PERMIT AND NOTIFICATION Effective November 30,1999, The Department of Health, Environmental Health AdministrationWill begin enforcing Lead Based Paint Abatement Permit and Notification requirements mandated by District of Columbia Code 6 997.7.

All contractors conducting Lead Based Paint Abatement, as defined by D. C. Code 6.997.1( l), within * theDistrict of Columbia, are required to submit a notification, pay the associated fee, and obtain a permit,

Notifications are to be sent to the Department of Health at least ten ( 10) business days prior to the commencement of any lead based paint abatement project.

Permit applications are available at the Lead Poisoning Prevention Division located at 51N Street, N. E. on the 3   floor or you may contact Ms. Susan Mayo at 202 5351919

EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 30,1999 ***   GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Department of Health ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADMINISTRATION LEAD POISONING PREVENTION DIVISION LEAD ABATEMENT PERMIT Permit Number LP 021 8 P Date 2/ 22/ 00 E Address of work: 3700 MASSACHUSETTS AVE. N. W lot 38 square1398 ward ##  3 R Permission is hereby granted to: WORCESTER EISENBRANDT, INC.

M who is authorized to perform the work described herein at the address shown above in strict accordance with all District of Columbia and Federal Laws I T Contractor Distnct of Columbia Certification # DC 00490 Description of work: WET SCRAPE EXTERIOR STEEL LINTELS; USE GRINDER W/ HEPA StarlingDate 2/ 29/ 00 Expiration Date 09// 00 I I Dr. Ivan C. A. Walks Director Permit Clerk THIS PERMIT MUST ALWAYS BE DISPLAYED CONSPICUOUSLY AT THE WORK SITE UNTIL THE PROJECT IS COMPLETED IIPON COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT, NOTIFY THE LEAD POISONING PREVENTION DIVISION AT ( 202) 535 2690   THIS PERMIT IS ONLY VALID FOR THE DATES NOTEDON THIS PERMIT. YOU MUST NOTIFY THE LEAD POISONING PREVENTION DIVISION IF THERE IS A CHANGE IN START DATE OR COMPLETION DATE.


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64642-64644]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25780]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73425; File No. SR-MIAX-2014-55]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities
Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the MIAX Options Fee Schedule

October 24, 2014.
    Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice
is hereby given that on October 16, 2014, Miami International
Securities Exchange LLC (``MIAX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice
to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing a proposal to amend the MIAX Options Fee
Schedule (the ``Fee Schedule'').
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://www.miaxoptions.com/filter/

wotitle/rule_filing, at MIAX's principal office, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its marketing fee.\3\ The marketing
fee is assessed on certain transactions of all Market Makers.\4\ The
funds collected via this marketing fee are then put into pools
controlled by Primary Lead Market Makers (``PLMMs'') and LMMs. The PLMM
or LMM controlling a certain pool of funds can then determine the
Electronic Exchange Member(s) (``EEM'') to which the funds should be
directed in order to encourage such EEM(s) to send orders to the
Exchange. In accordance with Exchange Rule 514, an EEM can designate an
order (``Directed Order'') to a specific LMM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The proposal is based on a substantially similar filing by
the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 68131 (November 1, 2012), 77 FR 67032
(November 8, 2012) (SR-CBOE-2012-101).
    \4\ See MIAX Options Fee Schedule, Section (1)(b), entitled
Marketing Fee for more detail regarding the marketing fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, Section (1)(b) of the Fee Schedule, provides that to
qualify for a marketing fee allocation for an applicable month, an LMM
must either: (i) Have an appointment in the relevant option class at
the time of being directed the order; or (ii) for the month preceding
the applicable month (the ``qualifying month'') have an appointment as
an LMM for at least ten (10) trading days in a minimum of fifty percent
(50%) of the option classes listed on the Exchange for the entire
qualifying month. For non-directed orders and orders directed to non-
qualifying LMMs, applicable Marketing Fees are allocated to the PLMM's
Marketing Fee ``pool.'' All Market Makers that participated in such
transactions will pay the applicable Marketing Fee to the Exchange,
which will allocate such funds to the Member that controls the
distribution of the Marketing Fee ``pool.'' Each month the Member will
submit written instructions to MIAX describing how MIAX is to
distribute the Marketing Fees in the ``pool'' to Electronic Exchange
Members identified by the Member.
    However, other options exchanges allow an LMM (or similar position)
to have access to the marketing fee funds generated from a Directed
Order (or similar order type) regardless of whether the LMM has an
appointment in a class in which the Directed Order is received and
executed without the additional requirement for an LMM to have at least
ten (10) trading days in a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the option
classes listed on the Exchange for the entire qualifying month.\5\ The
Exchange now proposes to remove this additional requirement so that its
marketing fee program operates in a manner more similar to that of
competing options exchanges that offer similar programs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See CBOE Fees Schedule, fn. 6; NASDAQ OMX Phlx, LLC
(``Phlx'') Pricing Schedule, section on Payment for Order Flow Fee;
NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule, fn. 10; International Securities
Exchange, LLC (``ISE'') Schedule of Fees, Section IV(D)[sic]. None
of which contain requirements that a PLMM or LMM (or similar
position) have an appointment in the class in which a Directed Order
(or similar order type) is received and executed nor the additional
requirement of a minimum number of options class appointments in
order to have access to the marketing fee funds generated from that
Preferred order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes amending the Fee Schedule to allow LMMs to
receive an allocation of marketing fees generated by Directed Orders
sent to the LMM without any additional requirements. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to remove the requirements that provide that an LLM,
in order to qualify to be allocated Marketing Fees for Directed Orders
for an applicable month, must either: (i) Have an appointment in the
relevant option class at the time of being directed the order; or (ii)
for the month preceding the applicable month (the ``qualifying month'')
have an appointment as an LMM for at least ten (10) trading days in a
minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the option classes listed on the
Exchange for the entire qualifying month. The proposed changes will
more closely align the Exchange's marketing fee program with the
requirements of other competing exchanges that offer similar
programs.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Permitting LMMs to be allocated marketing fees generated from a
Directed Order without these additional requirements would allow LMMs
to encourage greater order flow to be sent to the Exchange. This
increased order flow would benefit all market participants on the
Exchange, such as customers with resting orders on the Exchange and
LMMs that have an appointment and quote in the relevant option.
Allowing LMMs to be allocated marketing fees generated from a Directed
Order in the manner that is proposed would provide LMMs with an
incentive to encourage the routing of order flow into classes in which
the LMM otherwise would not. Further, the proposal will also provide
LMMs with more flexibility to determine which classes that they choose
to be appointed in and still receive payment for order flow without the
restrictive criteria; as they will not have to be concerned with
whether or not they have met the minimum class appointment threshold
prior to making arrangements to paying for order flow in a specific
class.
    The proposed fee changes are to take effect on November 1, 2014.
2. Statutory Basis
    MIAX believes that its proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act \7\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \8\ in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that this proposal to remove a requirement
that other exchanges do not share, perfects the mechanism for a free
and open market and a national market system by allowing the Exchange's
marketing fee program to operate in a manner similar to competing
options exchanges. In addition, the proposal promotes just and
equitable principles of trade by encouraging greater order flow to be
sent to the Exchange through Directed Orders in a manner that will
benefit all market participants on the Exchange.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposed changes to the
marketing fee is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \9\ which
provides that Exchange

rules may provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members and other persons using its
facilities. The proposed change is reasonable because it will allow
LMMs greater access to marketing fee funds. The proposed change is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it is designed to
allow LMMs to encourage greater order flow to be sent to the Exchange.
A LMM could be able to amass a greater pool of funds with which to use
to incent order flow providers to send order flow to the Exchange. This
increased order flow would benefit all market participants on the
Exchange. Further, allowing additional LMMs to access marketing fee
funds generated from a Directed Order would provide LMMs with an
incentive to encourage the routing of order flow into classes in which
the LMM otherwise would not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change would
place the Exchange on equal footing as other exchanges that allow their
LMM equivalents to be allocated marketing fees generated by Directed
Orders. The Exchange believes that such an even playing field will
promote competition among options exchanges. The Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily direct order flow to competing venues who offer similar fee
structures. Many competing venues offer similar fee structures to
market participants. To this end, the Exchange is proposing a market
enhancement to encourage market participants to trade on the Exchange.
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is procompetitive
because it would enable the Exchange to provide member organizations
with a fee structure that is similar to that of other exchanges.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\10\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-MIAX-2014-55 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2014-55. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2014-55 and should be
submitted on or before November 20, 2014.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-25780 Filed 10-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 47 (Monday, March 11, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8702-8703]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04325]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD19-8-000]

Notice of Workshop: America's Water Infrastructure Act of 2018

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) staff
will hold a workshop on April 4, 2019, from 1:00 p.m. (EDT) to 4:45
p.m. (EDT) in the Commission Meeting Room at 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. The workshop will be open to the public, and all
interested parties are invited to attend and participate. The workshop
will be led by Commission staff, and may be attended by one or more
Commissioners. The workshop will involve roundtable discussions by a
number of panelists and moderated by Commission staff.
    The purpose of the workshop is to explore potential opportunities
for development of closed-loop pumped storage projects at abandoned
mine sites in compliance with section 3004 of the America's Water
Infrastructure Act of 2018. An agenda for the workshop is attached to
this notice. There will be time for audience questions and comments
following each agenda discussion topic.
    A free webcast of this event will be available through
www.ferc.gov. Anyone with internet access who wants to view this event
can do so by navigating to the Calendar of Events at www.ferc.gov and
locating this event in the Calendar. The Capitol Connection provides
technical support for webcasts and offers the option of listening to
the workshop via phone-bridge for a fee. If you have any questions,
visit www.CapitolConnection.org or call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Those interested in attending the workshop or viewing the webcast
are encouraged to register at https://

www.ferc.gov/whats-new/registration/04-04-19-form.asp.
    Commission workshops are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please
send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll
free) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a FAX to<PHONE_NUMBER> with the
required accommodations.
    For more information about this workshop, please contact: Monir
Chowdhury (Technical Information), Office of Energy Projects, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Sarah McKinley (Logistical Information), Office of External
Affairs, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: March 5, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-04325 Filed 3-8-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P