[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 23 (Monday, February 4, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7670-7672]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02308]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2012-0828]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Indian Street Bridge Construction, St. Lucie Canal,
Palm City, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
St. Lucie Canal, Palm City, Florida to provide for the safety of life
and vessels on a narrow waterway during bridge construction for the
Indian Street Bridge. Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Miami or a designated
representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from February 11, 2013 through March 11,
2013. This rule will be enforced from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. each day.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2012-0828. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade Mike H. Wu, Sector Miami
Prevention Department, Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the Coast Guard did not receive all
necessary information regarding the bridge construction until January
7, 2013. As a result, the Coast Guard did not have sufficient time to
publish a NPRM and to receive public comments prior to the operations.
Any delay in the effective date of this rule would be contrary to the
public interest because this rule is needed to provide for the safety
of life on a navigable waterway of the United States.
    For the same reason discussed above, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective
less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish regulated navigation areas and other limited access areas: 33
U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
    The purpose of the rule is to provide for the safety of life and
vessels on a narrow waterway during bridge construction.

C. Discussion of Rule

    From February 11, 2013 through March 11, 2013, construction will be
conducted on the Indian Street Bridge in Palm City, Florida. The
construction will impede the safe navigation of vessel traffic on a
narrow waterway.
    The temporary safety zone encompasses all waters of the St. Lucie
Canal in the vicinity of the Indian Street Bridge, Palm City, Florida.
This safety zone will be enforced daily from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. during
this period of bridge construction.
    Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining within the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Miami or a designated
representative.
    Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor in,
or remain within the safety zone may contact the Captain of the Port
Miami by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or a designated representative via
VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the safety zone is
granted by the Captain of the Port Miami or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Miami or a
designated representative. The Coast Guard will provide notice of the
safety zone by Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners,
and on-scene designated representatives.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. The economic impact of
this rule is not significant for the following reasons: (1) The safety
zone will be enforced for a maximum of 6 hours daily; (2) persons and
vessels may enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the
safety zone if authorized by the Captain of the Port Miami or a
designated representative; (3) persons and vessels not authorized by
the Captain of the Port Miami or designated representative to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain within the safety zone may
operate in the surrounding area during the enforcement period; and (4)
the Coast Guard will provide advance notification of the safety zone to
the local maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended,

requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the
safety zone established by this regulation during the respective
enforcement period.
    For the reasons discussed in the Regulatory Planning and Review
section above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a temporary safety
zone to provide for the safety of life. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add a temporary Sec.  165.T07-0828 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T07-0828  Safety Zone; Indian Street Bridge Construction, St.
Lucie Canal, Palm City, FL.

    (a) Regulated Area. The following regulated area is a safety zone.
All waters of the St. Lucie Canal, Palm City, FL surrounding the Indian
Street Bridge bounded by the following positions: starting at point 1
in position 27[deg]09'36'' N, 80[deg]15'06'' W; thence southeast across
the canal to position 2 in position 27[deg]09'35'' N, 80[deg]15'04'' W;
thence southwest along the shoreline to position 3 in position
27[deg]09'29'' N, 80[deg]15'07'' W; thence northwest across the canal
to position 4 in position 27[deg]09'30'' N, 80[deg]15'09'' W; then
northeast along the shoreline back to point of origin.
    (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Miami in the enforcement of the regulated area.
    (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the
regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Miami or a
designated representative.
    (2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the
Port Miami by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or a designated representative
via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization
to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated
area is granted by the Captain of the Port Miami or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Miami or a
designated representative.
    (3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene
designated representatives.
    (d) Effective Date. This rule is effective from 10 a.m. February
11, 2013 through 4 p.m. March 11, 2013.

    Dated: January 15, 2013.
J.B. Pruett,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Miami.
[FR Doc. 2013-02308 Filed 2-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 10, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 32903]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14671]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1337-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Submits tariff filing per 154.204: Negotiated Rates--
MC Global 7-1-2019 Releases to be effective 7/1/2019 under RP19-1337.
    Filed Date: 6/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190627-5043.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1338-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Submits tariff filing per 154.204: Neg Rate 2019-06-27
CP Castleton and Twin Eagle (E2W) to be effective 07/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 6/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190627-5096.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1368-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 070219 Negotiated Rates--
Spotlight Energy, LLC R-77250-6 to be effective 9/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/2/19.
    Accession Number: 20190702-5070.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1369-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 070219 Negotiated Rates--
Tenaska Marketing Ventures R-2835-20 to be effective 9/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/2/19.
    Accession Number: 20190702-5071.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1372-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Cove Point LNG, LP.
    Description: Compliance filing DECP--2019 Penalty Revenue
Distribution to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 7/2/19.
    Accession Number: 20190702-5096.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1373-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing DETI--2019 Overrun and Penalty
Revenue Distribution to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 7/2/19.
    Accession Number: 20190702-5112.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1374-000.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 20170702 Negotiated Rate to be
effective 7/3/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/2/19.
    Accession Number: 20190702-5202.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/15/19.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 3, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-14671 Filed 7-9-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77474]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30049]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-626-000]

North Energy Power, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding,
of North Energy Power, LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability is January 6, 2015.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 17, 2014.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30049 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 193 (Friday, October 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56307-56308]
[FR Doc No: 2021-21992]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-93250; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2021-077]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Delay Implementation of SR-NASDAQ-2021-009

October 4, 2021.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 29, 2021, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to delay implementation of SR-NASDAQ-2021-
009.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.]

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    On February 11, 2021, the Exchange filed a proposed rule change to
make certain changes to the Exchange's Limit Up-Limit Down (``LULD'')
closing cross, including the timing of the LULD closing cross, the
process for determining the LULD closing cross price, establishing
price protections for the LULD closing cross, the handling of on-close
orders, and the imbalance information disseminated for the LULD closing
cross.\3\ The proposed rule change indicated that the Exchange would
implement the new functionalities in Q3 2021.\4\ The Exchange proposes
to delay the implementation of these functionalities until Q4 2021. The
Exchange will issue an Equity Trader Alert notifying market
participants prior to implementing these functionalities. The Exchange
proposes this delay to allow the Exchange additional time to test and
implement these functionalities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92068 (May 28,
2021), 86 FR 29864 (June 3, 2021) (SR-NASDAQ-2021-009).
    \4\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\5\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest,
by allowing the Exchange additional time to test and implement the LULD
closing cross changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange's proposal to
delay the implementation of SR-NASDAQ-2021-009 does not impose an undue
burden on competition. Delaying the implementation will simply allow
the Exchange additional time to properly implement SR-NASDAQ-2021-009.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \9\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\10\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay. Waiver of the
operative delay would allow the Exchange to immediately delay the
implementation of the new LULD closing cross functionalities and
provide the Exchange additional time to test and implement these
functionalities. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day
operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest. Accordingly, the Commission hereby waives the
operative delay and designates the proposed rule change operative upon
filing.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \11\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission also has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2021-077 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2021-077. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2021-077 and should be submitted
on or before October 29, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-21992 Filed 10-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 142 (Thursday, July 23, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 44559]
[FR Doc No: 2020-15913]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-40, OMB Control No. 3235-0313]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension:
    Rule 203-2 and Form ADV-W.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for extension of the previously approved
collection of information discussed below.
    The title for the collection of information is ``Rule 203-2 (17 CFR
275.203-2) and Form ADV-W (17 CFR 279.2) under the Investment Advisers
Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b).'' Rule 203-2 under the Investment Advisers
Act of 1940 establishes procedures for an investment adviser to
withdraw its registration or pending registration with the Commission.
Rule 203-2 requires every person withdrawing from investment adviser
registration with the Commission to file Form ADV-W electronically on
the Investment Adviser Registration Depository (``IARD''). The purpose
of the information collection is to notify the Commission and the
public when an investment adviser withdraws its pending or approved SEC
registration. Typically, an investment adviser files a Form ADV-W when
it ceases doing business or when it is ineligible to remain registered
with the Commission.
    The potential respondents to this information collection are all
investment advisers registered with the Commission or have applications
pending with the Commission. The Commission has estimated that
compliance with the requirement to complete Form ADV-W imposes a total
burden of approximately 0.75 hours (45 minutes) for an adviser filing
for full withdrawal and approximately 0.25 hours (15 minutes) for an
adviser filing for partial withdrawal. Based on historical filings, the
Commission estimates that there are approximately 802 respondents
annually filing for full withdrawal and approximately 454 respondents
annually filing for partial withdrawal. Based on these estimates, the
total estimated annual burden would be 715 hours ((802 respondents x
.75 hours) + (454 respondents x .25 hours)).
    Rule 203-2 and Form ADV-W do not require recordkeeping or records
retention. The collection of information requirements under the rule
and form are mandatory. The information collected pursuant to the rule
and Form ADV-W are filings with the Commission. These filings are not
kept confidential. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following website: >www.reginfo.gov<. Find this
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice
to (i)www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii) David Bottom,
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o Cynthia Roscoe, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by
sending an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: July 17, 2020.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-15913 Filed 7-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: May 1, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 83)]
[Notices]
[Page 23815]
[DOCID:fr01my07-57]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[OH-167-1; FRL-8307-9]

Adequacy Status of the Columbus and Toledo, OH, Submitted 8-Hour
Ozone Redesignation and Maintenance Plans for Transportation Conformity
Purposes

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of adequacy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is notifying the public that we have found
that the motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for volatile organic
compounds (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) in the
Columbus, Ohio area (Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Knox, Licking, and
Madison Counties) and the Toledo, Ohio area (Lucas and Wood Counties)
are adequate for use in transportation conformity determinations. Ohio
submitted the Columbus budgets with an 8-hour ozone redesignation
request and maintenance plan on December 28, 2006, January 10, 2007,
and March 9, 2007. Ohio submitted the Toledo budgets with an 8-hour
ozone redesignation request and maintenance plan on December 22, 2006,
and March 9, 2007. As a result of our finding, Columbus and Toledo,
Ohio must use the MVEBs from the submitted 8-hour ozone redesignation
and maintenance plan for future transportation conformity
determinations.

DATES: This finding is effective May 16, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Maietta, Life Scientist,
Criteria Pollutant Section (AR-18J), Air Programs Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312)
353-8777<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we'',
``us'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.

Background

    Today's notice is simply an announcement of a finding that we have
already made. On April 5, 2007, EPA Region 5 sent a letter to the Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency stating that the 2009 and 2018 MVEBs
for the Columbus and Toledo areas, which were submitted with the 8-hour
ozone redesignation request and maintenance plans, are adequate.
Receipt of these MVEBs was announced on EPA's transportation conformity
website, and no comments were submitted. The finding is available at
EPA's conformity Web site: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm
.

    The adequate 2009 and 2018 MVEBs, in tons per day (tpd), for VOC
for Columbus and Toledo are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        2009      2018
                                                        MVEB      MVEB
                                                        (tpd)     (tpd)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Columbus............................................     72.16     41.50
Toledo..............................................     18.99     11.20
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The adequate 2009 and 2018 MVEBs, in tons per day (tpd), for
NOX for Columbus and Toledo are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        2009      2018
                                                        MVEB      MVEB
                                                        (tpd)     (tpd)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Columbus............................................    125.43     56.30
Toledo..............................................     33.75     14.11
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the
Clean Air Act. EPA's conformity rule requires that transportation
plans, programs, and projects conform to state air quality
implementation plans and establishes the criteria and procedures for
determining whether or not they do. Conformity to a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) means that transportation activities will not
produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or
delay timely attainment of the national ambient air quality standards.
    The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP's motor vehicle
emission budgets are adequate for transportation conformity purposes
are outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). We have described our process for
determining the adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in our July 1, 2004,
preamble starting at 69 FR 40038, and we used the information in these
resources while making our adequacy determination. Please note that an
adequacy review is separate from EPA's completeness review, and it also
should not be used to prejudge EPA's ultimate approval of the SIP. Even
if we find a budget adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved.
    The finding and the response to comments are available at EPA's
transportation conformity Web site: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm
.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671 q.

    Dated: April 19, 2007.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. E7-8278 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: June 10, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 112)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 32659-32662]
[DOCID:fr10jn08-7]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0636; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-324-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; ATR Model ATR42-200, -300, and -320
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    One ATR 42-300 experienced a collapse of the Right (RH) Main
Landing Gear (MLG) when taxiing, caused by failure of the side brace
assembly. Investigations revealed a crack propagation that occurred
from a corrosion pit, in a very high stressed area of the upper arm.
* * *
* * * * *

    The unsafe condition is cracking of the upper arms of the secondary
side brace assemblies of the MLG, which could result in collapse of the
MLG during takeoff or landing, damage to the airplane, and possible
injury to the flightcrew and passengers. The proposed AD would require
actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in
the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 10, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0636;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-324-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2007-0263, dated October 3, 2007 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    ONE ATR 42-300 experienced a collapse of the Right (RH) Main
Landing Gear (MLG) when taxiing, caused by failure of the side brace
assembly. Investigations revealed a crack propagation that occurred
from a corrosion pit, in a very high stressed area of the upper arm.
Dimensions of the corrosion pit were lower than the minimum defect
size that can be detected by usual inspection means used during
landing gear overhaul. The superseded EASA (European Aviation Safety
Agency) Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2007-0112 was issued to require
repetitive inspections on affected high stressed areas on MLG side
brace assemblies for crack detection and to replace the affected
side brace assembly if any defect was found.
    Since the issuance of [EASA] AD 2007-0112, a modification of
[the] side brace upper arm has been developed as terminating action.
However, production non-conformity of the inspection tool was
discovered.
    In order to correct the discrepancy of the initial tool, new
inspection tool components have been manufactured and the Service
Bulletin (SB) Messier Dowty 631-32-191 has been updated to revision
2 accordingly. This directive mandates re-inspection of MLG side
brace assemblies previously inspected in accordance with revision 1
of the Messier Dowty SB 631-32-191 and reduces the inspection
interval initially proposed in [EASA] AD 2007-0112 in order to
maintain the same level of confidence.
* * * * *

The unsafe condition is cracking of the upper arms of the secondary
side brace assemblies of the MLG, which could result in collapse of the
MLG during takeoff or landing, damage to the airplane, and possible
injury to the flightcrew and passengers. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Messier-Dowty has issued Special Inspection Service Bulletin 631-
32-191, Revision 2, dated August 30, 2007, and Service Bulletin 631-32-
194, dated June 6, 2007. ATR has issued Service Bulletin ATR42-32-0092,
dated June 25, 2007. ATR has also issued Technical Instruction ATR42-
07-01, dated February 5, 2007. The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in
the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 31 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 35 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $0 per product. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $86,800, or $2,800 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

ATR--GIE Avions de Transport Regional (Formerly Aerospatiale):
Docket No. FAA-2008-0636; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-324-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by July 10, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to ATR Model ATR42-200, -300, and -320
airplanes, certificated in any category; excluding airplanes on
which ATR Modification 8463 has been done.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
gear.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    One ATR 42-300 experienced a collapse of the Right (RH) Main
Landing Gear (MLG) when taxiing, caused by failure of the side brace
assembly. Investigations revealed a crack propagation that occurred
from a corrosion pit, in a very high stressed area of the upper arm.
Dimensions of the corrosion pit were lower than the minimum defect
size that can be detected by usual inspection means used during
landing gear overhaul. The superseded EASA (European Aviation Safety
Agency) Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2007-0112 was issued to require
repetitive inspections on affected high stressed areas on MLG side
brace assemblies for crack detection and to replace the affected
side brace assembly if any defect was found.
    Since the issuance of [EASA] AD 2007-0112, a modification of
[the] side brace upper arm has been developed as terminating action.
However, production non-conformity of the inspection tool was
discovered.
    In order to correct the discrepancy of the initial tool, new
inspection tool components have been manufactured and the Service
Bulletin (SB) Messier Dowty 631-32-191 has been updated to revision
2 accordingly. This directive mandates re-inspection of MLG side
brace assemblies previously inspected in accordance with revision 1
of the Messier Dowty SB 631-32-191 and reduces the inspection
interval initially proposed in [EASA] AD 2007-0112 in order to
maintain the same level of confidence.
* * * * *
    The unsafe condition is cracking of the upper arms of the
secondary side brace assemblies of the MLG, which could result in
collapse of the MLG during takeoff or landing, damage to the
airplane, and possible injury to the flightcrew and passengers.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) For MLG side brace assemblies with part number (P/N)
D22710000, without suffix ``-9'': Unless already done, do the
following actions.
    (1) For airplanes on which the MLG side brace assemblies have
not been inspected as of the effective date of this AD, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Messier-Dowty
Service Bulletin 631-32-191, Revision 1, dated February 26, 2007:
Perform the initial eddy current inspection for cracking of the MLG
side brace, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Messier-Dowty Special Inspection Service Bulletin 631-32-191,
Revision 2, dated August 30, 2007, at the applicable time specified
in Table 1 of this AD. Unless otherwise specified, the flight cycles
and times indicated in Table 1 of this AD must be interpreted as
total flight cycles since overhaul, or time since overhaul, and as
total flight cycles since new or time since manufacture for side
brace assemblies that have not undergone any overhaul yet.

                       Table 1.--Compliance Times
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 For a MLG side brace assembly with the
 total flight cycles since new or total
 flight cycles since overhaul specified    Do the initial inspection at
 below as of the effective date of this     the time specified below--
                  AD--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
More than 8,000 flight cycles..........  Within 500 flight cycles after
                                          the effective date of this AD.
5,000 or more total flight cycles, but   Within 1,000 flight cycles
 not more than 8,000 total flight         after the effective date of
 cycles.                                  this AD or before accumulating
                                          8,500 flight cycles, whichever
                                          occurs first.
Less than 5,000 flight cycles..........  Within 2,000 flight cycles
                                          after the effective date of
                                          this AD or before accumulating
                                          6,000 flight cycles, whichever
                                          occurs first.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (2) For airplanes on which the MLG side brace assemblies have
been inspected as of the effective date of this AD, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Messier-Dowty Service
Bulletin 631-32-191, Revision 1, dated February 26, 2007: Within
1,000 flight cycles after the last inspection or within 200 flight
cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later,
perform an eddy current inspection for cracking of the MLG side
brace, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Messier-Dowty Special Inspection Service Bulletin 631-32-191,
Revision 2, dated August 30, 2007.
    (3) After accomplishment of the inspection required by paragraph
(f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD, repeat the inspection at intervals not
to exceed 2,600 flight cycles in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Messier-Dowty Special Inspection Service Bulletin
631-32-191, Revision 2, dated August 30, 2007.
    (4) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2) and (f)(3) of this AD, before further
flight, replace the affected side brace in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Messier-Dowty Special Inspection
Service Bulletin 631-32-191, Revision 2, dated August 30, 2007.
    (5) At the applicable time specified in paragraph (f)(5)(i) or
(f)(5)(ii) of this AD: Inspect for cracking, corrosion, and defects
of the MLG side brace assemblies with P/N D22710000, without suffix
``-9'', in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Messier Dowty Service Bulletin 631-32-194, dated June 6, 2007.
    (i) For airplanes having side brace assemblies on which Messier-
Bugatti Service Bulletin 631-32-072 has not been incorporated:
Before accumulating 16,000 total flight cycles or within 8 years
after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
    (ii) For airplanes having side brace assemblies on which
Messier-Bugatti Service Bulletin 631-32-072 has been incorporated:
Before accumulating 19,000 total flight cycles or within 8 years
after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
    (6) If no cracking, corrosion, or defect is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (f)(5) of this AD, before further
flight, modify and re-identify (by adding a suffix ``-9'' to P/N
D22710000) the MLG side brace assemblies in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of ATR Service Bulletin ATR42-32-0092,
dated June 25, 2007.
    (7) If any cracking, corrosion, or defect is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (f)(5) of this AD, before further
flight, replace the discrepant MLG side brace assembly with a
modified and re-identified MLG side brace assembly in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of ATR Service Bulletin ATR42-
32-0092, dated June 25, 2007.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: Although the MCAI or service information allows further
flight if a crack is found during compliance with the required
inspections, this AD requires that you repair the crack before
further flight.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-1137; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2007-0263, dated
October 3, 2007, and the service information specified in Table 2 of
this AD, for related information.

                                          Table 2.--Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Service Bulletin                        Revision                              Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATR Service Bulletin ATR 42-32-0092......  Original....................  June 25, 2007.
ATR Technical Instruction ATR 42 ATR 42-   Original....................  February 5, 2007.
 07-01.
Messier-Dowty Service Bulletin 631-32-194  Original....................  June 6, 2007.
Messier-Dowty Special Inspection Service   2...........................  August 30, 2007.
 Bulletin 631-32-191.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 3, 2008.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-12934 Filed 6-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 79 (Thursday, April 24, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22771-22772]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09155]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0932; Airspace Docket No. 13-ASO-24]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Nashville, TN

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class E Airspace at Nashville, TN, to
accommodate a new Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning System
(GPS) Standard Instrument Approach Procedure (SIAP) serving Nashville
International Airport. This action enhances the safety and management
of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, July 24, 2014. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under title 1,
Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O.
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On February 12, 2014, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to establish Class E airspace at
Nashville, TN (79 FR 8367) Docket No. FAA-2013-0932. Interested parties
were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting
written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received.
Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6003 of FAA
Order 7400.9X dated August 7, 2013, and effective September 15, 2013,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 establishes the Class E airspace as an extension to a Class C
surface area at Nashville, TN, providing the controlled airspace
required to support the new RNAV (GPS) standard instrument approach
procedures for Nashville International Airport. Accordingly, a segment
of controlled airspace would extend from the 5-mile radius of the
airport to 11.7-miles south of the airport, and a segment would extend
from the 5-mile radius of the airport to 8.9 miles southwest of the
airport. This action provides for the safety and management of IFR
operations at the airport. Also, an editorial change is made to the
Class E airspace designation 6003 title to include wording omitted in
the NPRM.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes controlled airspace at Nashville International
Airport, Nashville, TN. Except for the editorial change stated above,
this rule is the same as published in the NPRM.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 7, 2013, effective September 15, 2013, is amended
as follows:

Paragraph 6003 Class E Airspace Designated as an Extension to a
Class C Surface Area.

* * * * *

ASO TN E3 Nashville, TN [New]

Nashville International Airport, TN
    (Lat. 36[deg]07'31'' N., long. 86[deg]40'35'' W.)
Nashville VORTAC
    (Lat. 36[deg]07'62'' N., long. 86[deg]40'95'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface extending from
the 5-mile radius of Nashville International Airport to an 11.7-mile
radius southeast of the airport, from the Nashville VORTAC 161[deg]
radial clockwise to the 195[deg] radial, and to an 8.9-mile radius
southwest of the airport from the 195[deg] radial of the VORTAC
clockwise to the 231[deg] radial of the VORTAC.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on April 14, 2014.
Myron A. Jenkins,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2014-09155 Filed 4-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P