[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 206 (Friday, October 23, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67533-67534]
[FR Doc No: 2020-23503]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0750; FRL-10015-67]

Pesticide Registration Review; Proposed Interim Decisions for
Several Pesticides; Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's proposed
interim registration review decisions and opens a 60-day public comment
period on the proposed interim decisions for the following pesticides:
1,3-dichloropropene, 1-methylcyclopropene; aluminum phosphide;
Beauveria bassiana; benzyl benzoate; butoxypolypropylene glycol (BPG);
carboxin/oxycarboxin; cyhalothrins; Dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide
(DBNPA); halohydantoins; inorganic sulfites; irgarol; kaolin; magnesium
phosphide; methoprene/kinoprene/hydroprene; myclobutanil; naphthalene
acetic acid, salts, ester, and acetamide (NAA); organic esters of
phosphoric acid (OEPA); Paecilomyces species; phosphine; propylene
oxide (PPO); Streptomyces lydicus strain WYEC 108; triallate;
triphenyltin hydroxide (TPTH); and triticonazole. In addition, the
human health and ecological risk assessments for benzyl benzoate,
butoxypolypropylene glycol, and OEPA are also being published for
comment at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 22, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by the docket
identification (ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest
provided in the Table in Unit IV, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For pesticide specific information, contact: The Chemical Review
Manager for the pesticide of interest identified in the Table in Unit
IV.
    For general information on the registration review program,
contact: Melanie Biscoe, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P),
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(703) 305-7106; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest
identified in the Table in Unit IV.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information on a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.

II. Background

    Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide
registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the
statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform
its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human
health or the environment. As part of the registration review process,
the Agency has completed proposed interim decisions for all pesticides
listed in the Table in Unit IV. Through this program, EPA is ensuring
that each pesticide's registration is based on current scientific and
other knowledge, including its effects on human health and the
environment.

III. Authority

    EPA is conducting its registration review of the chemicals listed
in the Table in Unit IV pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural
Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C.
Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the
registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under
FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only
if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA
section 3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance with
widespread and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must
perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on
the environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the
environment, or a human dietary risk from residues that result from the
use of a pesticide in or on food.

IV. What action is the Agency taking?

    Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58, this notice announces the availability
of EPA's proposed interim registration review decisions for the
pesticides shown in Table 1 and opens a 60-day public comment period on
the proposed interim registration review decisions. In addition, the
human health and ecological risk assessments for aluminum phosphide,
benzyl benzoate, butoxypolypropylene glycol, magnesium phosphide, the
organic esters of phosphoric acid (OEPA), phosphine, and propylene
oxide are also being published for comment at this time.

                                       Table 1--Proposed Interim Decisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Chemical review manager and
Registration review case name and No.                 Docket ID No.                     contact information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,3-Dichloropropene, Case 0328.......  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0154                        Michelle Nolan,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
1-Methylcyclopropene, Case Number      EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0670                        Bibiana Oe,
 6075<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703)
                                                                                347-8162.
Aluminum phosphide, Case Number 0025.  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0081                        Jonathan Williams,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Beauveria bassiana, Case Number 6057.  EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0564                        Susanne Cerrelli,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Benzyl benzoate, Case Number 4013....  EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0597                        Moana Appleyard,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Butoxypolypropylene glycol (BPG),      EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0048                        Veronica Dutch,
 Case Number 3123<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Carboxin and Oxycarboxin, Case Number  EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0144                        Theodore Varns,
 0012<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Cyhalothrins, Case Number (Gamma--     EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0479 EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0480   Darius Stanton,
 7437 Lambda--7408<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide          EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0724                        Jessie Bailey,
 (DBNPA), Case Number 3056<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Halohydantoins, Case Number 3055.....  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0220                        Peter Bergquist,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Inorganic Sulfites, Case Numbers 7019  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0598                        Matthew B. Khan,
 and 4056<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703)
                                                                                347-8613.
Irgarol, Case Number 5031............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0003                        SanYvette Williams,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Kaolin, Case Number 6039.............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0107                        Daniel Schoeff,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Magnesium phosphide, Case Number 0645  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0081                        Jonathan Williams,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Methoprene, Kinoprene, and             EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0586                        Cody Kendrick,
 Hydroprene, Case Number 0030<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703)
                                                                                347-0468.
Myclobutanil, Case Number 7006.......  EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0053                        Kent Fothergill,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Naphthalene Acetic Acid, Salts,        EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0773                        Anna Romanovsky,
 Ester, and Acetamide (NAA), Case<EMAIL_ADDRESS> Number 0379.<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Organic Esters of Phosphoric Acid      EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0373                        Stephen Savage,
 (OEPA), Case Number 4122<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Paecilomyces species, Case Number      EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0403                        Andrew Queen,
 6047<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703)
                                                                                308-8135.
Phosphine, Case Number 7608..........  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0081                        Jonathan Williams,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Propylene oxide, Case Number 2560....  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0156                        Jonathan Williams,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Streptomyces lydicus strain WYEC 108,  EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0608                        Monica Thapa,
 Case Number 6088<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703)
                                                                                347-8688.
Triallate, Case Number 2695..........  EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0573                        Robert Little,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703)
                                                                                347-8156.
Triphenyltin hydroxide (TPTH), Case    EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0413                        Tiffany Green,
 Number 0099<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703)
                                                                                347-0314.
Triticonazole, Case Number 7036......  EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0602                        Christian Bongard,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The registration review docket for a pesticide includes earlier
documents related to the registration review case. For example, the
review opened with a Preliminary Work Plan, for public comment. A Final
Work Plan was placed in the docket following public comment on the
Preliminary Work Plan.
    The documents in the dockets describe EPA's rationales for
conducting additional risk assessments for the registration review of
the pesticides included in the tables in Unit IV, as well as the
Agency's subsequent risk findings and consideration of possible risk
mitigation measures. These proposed interim registration review
decisions are supported by the rationales included in those documents.
Following public comment, the Agency will issue interim or final
registration review decisions for the pesticides listed in Table 1 in
Unit IV.
    The registration review final rule at 40 CFR 155.58(a) provides for
a minimum 60-day public comment period on all proposed interim
registration review decisions. This comment period is intended to
provide an opportunity for public input and a mechanism for initiating
any necessary amendments to the proposed interim decision. All comments
should be submitted using the methods in ADDRESSES and must be received
by EPA on or before the closing date. These comments will become part
of the docket for the pesticides included in the Tables in Unit IV.
Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked
``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late comments.
    The Agency will carefully consider all comments received by the
closing date and may provide a ``Response to Comments Memorandum'' in
the docket. The interim registration review decision will explain the
effect that any comments had on the interim decision and provide the
Agency's response to significant comments.
    Background on the registration review program is provided at:
http://www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: October 7, 2020.
Mary Reaves,
Acting Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2020-23503 Filed 10-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 221 (Friday, November 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64928-64929]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25253]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-257-000.
    Applicants: Leaf River Energy Center LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Leaf River Order No. 587-Z
Compliance Filing 11-11-21 to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5012.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-258-000.
    Applicants: Spire Storage West LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Spire Storage West LLC Order No.
587-Z Compliance Filing to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5015.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-259-000.
    Applicants: Adelphia Gateway, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Adelphia Order No. 587-Z Compliance
Filing 11-12-21 to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5016.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-260-000.
    Applicants: Golden Triangle Storage, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: Proposed Revisions to FERC Gas
Tariff to Comply With Order No. 587-Z to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5021.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-261-000.
    Applicants: Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: V2 KMLP NAESB 3.2 to be effective
6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5022.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-262-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance to RM96-1-042--Order No.
587-Z to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5023.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-263-000.
    Applicants: Cheyenne Connector, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: CC 2021-11-12 NAESB 3.2 Filing to
be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5026.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-264-000.
    Applicants: Portland General Electric Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB 3.2 Standards Compliance
Filing to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5027.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-265-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: REX 2021-11-12 NAESB 3.2 Compliance
Filing to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5028.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-266-000.
    Applicants: Tallgrass Interstate Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: TIGT 2021-11-12 NAESB 3.2 Filing to
be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5029.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-267-000.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: TPC 2021-11-12 NAESB Filing to be
effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5030.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-268-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB 3.2--Compliance to RM96-1-
042--Order No. 587-Z to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5032.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-269-000.
    Applicants: Vector Pipeline L.P.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB 3.2 Compliance Filing to be
effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5033.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-270-000.
    Applicants: Kinder Morgan Illinois Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: V2 NAESB 3.2 to be effective 6/1/
2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5034.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-271-000.
    Applicants: North Baja Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB 3.2--Compliance to RM96-1-
042--Order No. 587-Z to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5036.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-272-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Compliance Filing Pursuant to
Order 587-Z to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5039.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-273-000.
    Applicants: Horizon Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Compliance Filing Pursuant to
Order 587-Z to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5040.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-274-000.
    Applicants: Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB 3.2--Compliance to RM96-1-
042--Order No. 587-Z to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5043.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-275-000.
    Applicants: Gas Transmission Northwest LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB 3.2--Compliance to RM96-1-
042--Order No. 587-Z to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5045.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-276-000.
    Applicants: Hardy Storage Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB 3.2--Compliance to RM96-1-
042--Order No. 587-Z to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5046.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-277-000.
    Applicants: Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: Gulfstream Order 587-Z (Docket
RM96-1-042) Compliance Filing to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5067.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-278-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB Order 587-Z Compliance Filing
to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5069.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-279-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB Order 587-Z Compliance Filing
to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5070.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-280-000.
    Applicants: Boardwalk Storage Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB Order 587-Z Compliance Filing
to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5071.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-281-000.
    Applicants: High Island Offshore System, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB v. 5.0 Compliance to be
effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5078.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-282-000.
    Applicants: MIGC LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB V3.2 (Order No. 587-Z)
Compliance to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5089.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-283-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Compliance filing: 11.12.21 FERC Order 587-Z (NAESB)
v3.2 Compliance Filing to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5095.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-284-000.
    Applicants: DBM Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Order No. 587-Z Compliance to be
effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5098.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-285-000.
    Applicants: ETC Tiger Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB 3.2 Compliance to be
effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5099.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-286-000.
    Applicants: Fayetteville Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Fayetteville Express Pipeline LLC
submits tariff filing per 154.203: NAESB 3.2 Compliance to be effective
6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5103.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-287-000.
    Applicants: Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB 3.2 Compliance to be
effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-288-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Gas Storage Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB 3.2 Compliance to be
effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5108.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-289-000.
    Applicants: Gulf States Transmission LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB 3.2 Compliance to be
effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5110.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-290-000.
    Applicants: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: NAESB 3.2 Compliance to be
effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20211112-5114.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/21.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 15, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-25253 Filed 11-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: May 28, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 103)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 30555-30559]
[DOCID:fr28my08-21]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2007-0075]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone: Port of Ponce, Puerto Rico

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish moving and fixed safety
zones around all vessels carrying Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) cargo in
the waters of the Caribbean Sea and Bahia de Ponce, Puerto Rico. This
action will protect the public from the inherent dangers of this highly
volatile material by requiring vessel traffic to maintain a safe
distance from LNG vessels operating near shore.

DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before July 28, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG-2007-0075 to the Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid duplication, please use only one
of the following methods:
    (1) Online: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (3) Hand delivery: Room W12-140 on the Ground Floor of the West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Ensign Rachael E. Love, Sector San Juan, Prevention
Department, Waterways & Facilities Division, at<PHONE_NUMBER>. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-
9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. We have an agreement with the
Department of Transportation (DOT) to use the Docket Management
Facility. Please see DOT's ``Privacy Act'' paragraph below.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2007-0075), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each
comment. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing address,
an e-mail address, or a phone number in the body of your document so
that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
You may submit your comments and material by electronic means, mail,
fax, or delivery to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES; but please submit your comments and material by only one
means. If you submit them by mail or delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period. We may change this
proposed rule in view of them.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov at
any time. Enter the docket number for this rulemaking (USCG.2007-0075)
in the search box, and click ``GO>>''. You may also visit either the
Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays; or the Sector San Juan, Prevention Department between 7:30
a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments received into
any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the Department of
Transportation's Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit http://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that
one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

Background and Purpose

    This rule is necessary to provide for the safety of life at sea by
excluding vessel traffic from the waters immediately adjacent to
liquefied natural gas (LNG) carriers. LNG in any quantity poses a risk
of fire or explosion due to its highly volatile nature. LNG carried by
tank ships in bulk quantities can be hazardous to a port if sufficient
precaution is not taken to reduce this risk. The proposed rule would
require vessel traffic to maintain a 100-yard separation from LNG
vessels transiting the harbor and 150-foot separation from LNG vessels
moored pier-side. The purpose of this rule is to minimize the risk of
vessel collision or allision with an LNG carrier, thereby reducing the
risk of fire or explosion.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    This proposed rule would establish the following moving and fixed
safety zones: A 100-yard zone surrounding all LNG vessels transiting
north of Latitude 17[deg]54'00'' N en route to or from the Puerto de
Ponce waterfront facility in Bahia de Ponce, Puerto Rico; and a 150-
foot zone surrounding all LNG vessels moored at the Puerto de Ponce
waterfront facility in Bahia de Ponce, Puerto Rico. The Coast Guard
will notify the public of effective periods by providing a broadcast
notice to mariners on VHF Marine Band Radio, Channel 22A (156.8 MHz).

Regulatory Evaluation

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
    We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary due to the
infrequent arrival of LNG carriers and the small amount of commercial
vessel traffic in Bahia de Ponce.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit a portion of Bahia de Ponce
when an LNG vessel is transiting the harbor or moored at the Puerto de
Ponce waterfront facility. This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons: The Port of Ponce receives only a few
commercial vessel arrivals per week, and recreational boating traffic
can easily transit around the regulated area.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT for assistance in understanding and
participating in this rulemaking. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is not likely to
have a significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' supporting this preliminary
determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Safety measures, and Waterways.

Words of Issuance and Proposed Regulatory Text

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

    1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191,
195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat.
2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

    2. Add Sec.  165.771 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.771  Safety Zone; Bahia de Ponce, Puerto Rico.

    (a) Location. The following area is established as a safety zone
during the specified conditions:
    (1) A 100 yard radius around any vessel carrying liquefied natural
gas (LNG) cargo while transiting north of Latitude
17[deg]54[min]00[sec] N in the waters of the Caribbean Sea and the
Bahia de Ponce, on approach to or departure from the Puerto de Ponce
waterfront facility in Bahia de Ponce.
    (2) The waters within 150 feet of any vessel carrying LNG cargo
while moored at the Puerto de Ponce waterfront facility in Bahia de
Ponce, between berths 4 and 7 at approximate position
17[deg]58[min]12[sec] N, 066[deg]37[min]08[sec] W.
    (b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
    Designated Representative means Coast Guard Patrol Commander
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers and other officers
operating

Coast Guard vessels and federal, state, and local officers designated
by or assisting the COTP San Juan in the enforcement of the safety
zone.
    (c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23 of this part, anchoring, mooring or transiting in these
zones is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the
Port or a designated representative. Persons and vessels desiring to
transit the Regulated Area may contact the U.S. Coast Guard Captain of
the Port San Juan at telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER> or on VHF channel 16
(156.8 MHz).
    (d) Enforcement periods. The Coast Guard will notify the maritime
community of effective periods via a broadcast notice to mariners on
VHF Marine Band Radio, Channel 22A (156.8 MHz).

    Dated: May 2, 2008.
R.R. Rodriguez,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port San Juan.
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28MY08.005

[FR Doc. E8-11864 Filed 5-27-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-C


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 28863]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10045]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2022-0029]

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    Under part 211 of title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this
document provides the public notice that on April 7, 2022, the
Delaware-Lackawanna Railroad Co., Inc. (DL), petitioned the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) for a waiver of compliance from certain
provisions of the Federal railroad safety regulations contained at 49
CFR part 240 (Qualification and Certification of Locomotive Engineers)
and part 242 (Qualification and Certification of Conductors). FRA
assigned the petition Docket Number FRA-2022-0029.
    Specifically, DL requests relief as part of its proposed
implementation of and participation in FRA's Confidential Close Call
Reporting System (C\3\RS) Program. DL seeks to shield reporting
employees and the railroad from mandatory punitive sanctions that would
otherwise arise as provided in 49 CFR 240.117(e)(1)-(4); 240.305(a)(l)-
(4) and (a)(6); 240.307; 242.403(b), (c), (e)(l)-(4), (e)(6)-(11),
(f)(l)-(2); and 242.407. The C\3\RS Program encourages certified
operating crew members to report close calls and protects the employees
and the railroad from discipline or sanctions arising from the
incidents reported per the C\3\RS Implementing Memorandum of
Understanding.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested parties
desire an opportunity for oral comment and a public hearing, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
    Communications received by June 27, 2022 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments received after that date will be
considered if practicable.
    Anyone can search the electronic form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better
inform its processes. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/
ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See also https://www.regulations.gov/privacy-notice for the
privacy notice of regulations.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
John Karl Alexy,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-10045 Filed 5-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 216 (Thursday, November 7, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60132-60134]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24252]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-87441; File No. SR-FINRA-2019-026]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Extend the Implementation Date of Certain
Amendments to FINRA Rule 4210 Approved Pursuant to SR-FINRA-2015-036

November 1, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 25, 2019, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC''
or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by FINRA. FINRA has
designated the proposed rule change as constituting a ``non-
controversial'' rule change under paragraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 under
the Act,\3\ which renders the proposal effective upon receipt of this
filing by the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    FINRA is proposing to extend, to March 25, 2021, the implementation
date of the amendments to FINRA Rule 4210 (Margin Requirements)
pursuant to SR-FINRA-2015-036, other than the amendments pursuant to
SR-FINRA-2015-036 that were implemented on December 15, 2016. The
proposed rule change would not make any changes to the text of FINRA
rules.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on FINRA's
website at http://www.finra.org, at the principal office of FINRA and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    On October 6, 2015, FINRA filed with the Commission proposed rule
change SR-FINRA-2015-036, which proposed to amend FINRA Rule 4210 to
establish margin requirements for (1) To Be Announced (``TBA'')
transactions, inclusive of adjustable rate mortgage (``ARM'')
transactions; (2) Specified Pool Transactions; and (3) transactions in
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (``CMOs''), issued in conformity
with a program of an agency or Government-Sponsored Enterprise
(``GSE''), with forward settlement dates, as defined more fully in the
filing (collectively, ``Covered Agency Transactions''). The Commission
approved SR-FINRA-2015-036 on June 15, 2016 (the ``Approval Date'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78081 (June 15,
2016), 81 FR 40364 (June 21, 2016) (Notice of Filing of Amendment
No. 3 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to a Proposed Rule
Change to Amend FINRA Rule 4210 (Margin Requirements) to Establish
Margin Requirements for the TBA Market, as Modified by Amendment
Nos. 1, 2, and 3; File No. SR-FINRA-2015-036).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Partial Amendment No. 3 to SR-FINRA-2015-036, FINRA
announced in Regulatory Notice 16-31 that the rule change would become
effective on December 15, 2017, 18 months from the Approval Date,
except that the risk limit determination requirements as set forth in
paragraphs (e)(2)(F), (e)(2)(G) and (e)(2)(H) of Rule 4210 and in new
Supplementary Material .05, each as respectively amended or established
by SR-FINRA-2015-036 (collectively, the ``risk limit determination
requirements''), would

become effective on December 15, 2016, six months from the Approval
Date.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Partial Amendment No. 3 to SR-FINRA-2015-036 and
Regulatory Notice 16-31 (August 2016), both available at:
www.finra.org.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Industry participants sought clarification regarding the
implementation of the requirements pursuant to SR-FINRA-2015-036.
Industry participants also requested additional time to make system
changes necessary to comply with the requirements, including time to
test the system changes, and requested additional time to update or
amend margining agreements and related documentation. In response,
FINRA made available a set of Frequently Asked Questions & Guidance \6\
and, pursuant to SR-FINRA-2017-029,\7\ extended the implementation date
of the requirements of SR-FINRA-2015-036 to June 25, 2018, except for
the risk limit determination requirements, which, as announced in
Regulatory Notice 16-31, became effective on December 15, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Available at: www.finra.org/rules-guidance/guidance/faqs.
Further, staff of the SEC's Division of Trading and Markets made
available a set of Frequently Asked Questions regarding Exchange Act
Rule 15c3-1 and Rule 15c3-3 in connection with Covered Agency
Transactions under FINRA Rule 4210, also available at:
www.finra.org/rules-guidance/guidance/faqs.
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81722 (September 26,
2017), 82 FR 45915 (October 2, 2017) (Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to Delay the Implementation
Date of Certain Amendments to FINRA Rule 4210 Approved Pursuant to
SR-FINRA-2015-036; File No. SR-FINRA-2017-029); see also Regulatory
Notice 17-28 (September 29, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Industry participants requested that FINRA reconsider the potential
impact of certain requirements pursuant to SR-FINRA-2015-036 on smaller
and medium-sized firms. Industry participants also requested that FINRA
extend the implementation date pending such reconsideration to reduce
potential uncertainty in the Covered Agency Transaction market. In
response to these concerns, FINRA further extended the implementation
date of the requirements of SR-FINRA-2015-036, other than the risk
limit determination requirements, to March 25, 2020 (the ``March 25,
2020 implementation date'').\8\ FINRA noted that, as FINRA stated in
Partial Amendment No. 3 to SR-FINRA-2015-036, FINRA would monitor the
impact of the requirements pursuant to that rulemaking and, if the
requirements prove overly onerous or otherwise are shown to negatively
impact the market, FINRA would consider revisiting such requirements as
may be necessary to mitigate the rule's impact.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85083 (February 8,
2019), 84 FR 4109 (February 14, 2019) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to Extend the
Implementation Date of Certain Amendments to FINRA Rule 4210
Approved Pursuant to SR-FINRA-2015-036; File No. SR-FINRA-2019-005).
    \9\ See Partial Amendment No. 3 to SR-FINRA-2015-036, available
at: www.finra.org.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA is considering, in consultation with industry participants
and other regulators, potential amendments to the requirements of SR-
FINRA-2015-036. FINRA believes that this is appropriate in the interest
of avoiding unnecessary disruption to the Covered Agency Transaction
market. As such, FINRA is proposing to extend the March 25, 2020
implementation date by an additional year, to March 25, 2021 while
FINRA considers potential amendments. FINRA notes that the risk limit
determination requirements pursuant to SR-FINRA-2015-036 became
effective on December 15, 2016 and, as such, the implementation of such
requirements is not affected by the proposed rule change.
    FINRA has filed the proposed rule change for immediate
effectiveness and has requested that the Commission waive the
requirement that the proposed rule change not become operative for 30
days after the date of the filing. The operative date will be the date
of filing of the proposed rule change.
2. Statutory Basis
    FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\10\ which requires, among
other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. FINRA believes that the proposed rule change provides
FINRA additional time to consider potential amendments to the
requirements pursuant to SR-FINRA-2015-036 and helps to reduce
potential uncertainty in the Covered Agency Transaction market while
FINRA considers such amendments. FINRA believes that providing
additional time is consistent with the Act because this provides FINRA,
in consultation with industry participants and other regulators,
additional opportunity to consider whether amendments to the
requirements would improve their effectiveness and thereby protect
investors and the public interest by helping to promote stability in
the Covered Agency Transaction market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. FINRA believes that extending
the March 25, 2020 implementation date to March 25, 2021, so as to
provide additional time for FINRA to consider, in consultation with
industry participants and other regulators, whether any amendments to
the requirements pursuant to SR-FINRA-2015-036 are appropriate will
benefit all parties.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \13\ normally
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing.
However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\14\ the Commission may
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. FINRA has requested
that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay so that the
proposal may become operative upon filing. FINRA has stated that the
purpose of the proposed rule change is to allow FINRA additional time
to consider potential revisions to the requirements of SR-FINRA-2015-
036, and to consult with industry participants and other regulators
whether any revisions are appropriate, in the interest of avoiding
unnecessary disruption to the Covered Agency Transaction market. The
Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest
because the proposal to extend

the implementation date of the requirements of Rule 4210 does not raise
any new or novel issues and will help to facilitate the implementation
of the margin requirements for Covered Agency Transactions. Therefore,
the Commission hereby waives the 30-day operative delay requirement and
designates the proposed rule change as operative upon filing.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \15\ For purposes of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the
Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-FINRA-2019-026 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2019-026. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of FINRA.
    All comments received will be posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2019-026 and should be
submitted on or before November 29, 2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-24252 Filed 11-6-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Analyzing Censored Data 450b 011 Goals Examine several different methods for dealing with censored data replace DL with specific value adjust estimators of parameters impute replacement values nonparametric methods Consider when each method might be most appropriate 450b 012 Dealing with Censored Data The way censored data are adressed depends on the objectives of the analysis:

hypothesis test or estimation?

parametric or non parametric methods?

relationship between detection limits and concentration levels of concern The method for addressing censored data also depends on the conceptual site model:

chemicals expected at concentrations lower than the detection limits?

naturally occurring chemicals? 450b 013 Start with Summarizing Data As with any statistical analysis, it is important to begin by looking closely at the data Summary statistics may help identify interesting aspects of the data range, median, mean, variance, etc.

for both censored and uncensored data Graphical presentations often show other characteristics of the data histograms, probability density plots, box plots, normal quantile plots, etc. 450b 014 Arsenic Example Future land use at a contaminated site in Nevada is residential Contamination levels are low across much of the several hundred acres, but, some " hot spots" of concern ( several acres) exist Arsenic levels are a concern  background data collected for arsenic Multiple detection limits are encountered when analyzing the data 450b 015 Arsenic Example:

Summary Statistics Detected concentrations exist that are less than detection limits Detects Non detects No. of samples No. Min. Max. No. Min. Med. Ave. Max.

102 24 1.25 7.9 78 1.7 6.5 7.3 31 450b 016  10 0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40 50 Histogram Frequency 0 10 20 30 Boxplot w/ Data Conc.

(

mg/

kg) x = Non detect O = Detect Density Estimate Conc. ( mg/ kg)

Density  10 0 10 20 30 40 0.0 0.04 0.08 Normal Probability Plot Standard Quantiles Conc.

(

mg/

kg)  2  1 0 1 2 0 10 20 30 # of ND's = 24 450b 017 Arsenic Example: Observations The bowing of the quantile plot indicates a fair degree of skewness The bumps in the curve may be random, or possibly symptomatic of something else The detection limits vary over a large range Working with the scientists on the team, it became apparent that the data could also have been summarized as follows: 450b 018 0 10 20 30 Source 1 x = Non detect O = Detect 0 10 20 30 Source 2 0 10 20 30 Source 3 450b 019 Arsenic Example:

Data Re evaluated There are 3 different sources for the data different geologies different analytical methods Different detection limits were encountered for each method The data require closer scrutiny to explain some of the unresolved issues Detects Non detects Data source n n Min. Max. n Min. Med. Ave. Max.

1 28 19 5.8 7.9 9 6.5 7.2 7.72 9.4 2 47 3 5 5 44 4.4 8.1 9.64 31 3 27 2 1.25 1.25 25 1.7 3.3 3.15 4.2 450b 0110 Arsenic Example:

Lessons Learned Summary statistics and graphics can be broken out for detects and non detects without losing any information from the data Substitution methods are not always needed Without needing to change the values of the non detects, it is clear from the summary statistics and the plots that background is not adequately characterized A new background study has been ordered 450b 0111 Dealing with Censored Data If estimation of hypothesis testing is desired or required, then some manipulation of the non detects is needed EPA QA/ G 9 guidance provides some simple recommendations for handling censored data Percentage of Nondetects Statistical Analysis Method < 15% Replace nondetects with:

DL/ 2 DL, or a very small number 15%  50% Use: Trimmed mean,

Cohen's adjustment, or Winsorized mean and standard deviation 450b 0112 Dealing with Censored Data There isn't a perfect, mathematically correct,

logical way to always analyze censored data There are, however, many different options from the simple to the complex, and from the tried and tested to the relatively unproven The professional judgement of all of the scientists working on the project needs to be utilized to determine which method seems most appropriate 450b 0113 DL Replacement Methods If parametric methods are going to be used for censored data, then rules need to be devised for how the censored data will be treated Let's look at the impact of three very simple methods that are commonly used for assigning values to the undetected data by considering an example 450b 0114 DL Replacement Methods:

Sample Data Set # 1 Suppose we received the following data from our analytical laboratory 1.175 < 0.500 33.144 < 1.000 < 1.000 6.266 < 1.000 < 0.250 16.019 4.696 3.361 2.971 < 0.500 13.521 < 0.250 < 0.500 3.982 2.288 2.242 < 0.250 450b 0115 0 20 40 0 5 10 15 Histogram Frequency 0 10 20 30 40 Boxplot w/ Data Conc.

(

mg/

kg) x = Non detect O = Detect Density Estimate Conc. ( mg/ kg)

Density 0 20 40 0.0 0.04 0.08 Normal Probability Plot Standard Quantiles Conc.

(

mg/

kg)  2  1 0 1 2 0 10 20 30 40 # of ND's = 9 450b 0116 DL Replacement Methods  DL The first commonly used method is to assign each datum below the detection limit the value of the detection limit ( DL)

XND = DL What are the ramifications of this in terms of the subsequent analysis? 450b 0117 DL Replacement Methods:

Sample Data Set # 1 It will result in an overestimate of the mean It will ( usually) result in an underestimate of the variability Complete Data Censored Data Assigned Detection Limits Mean 4.643 4.746 Variance 64.090 63.180 450b 0118 DL Replacement Methods  1/ 2 DL The second method frequently used for censored data is to assign each datum below the detection limit the value equal to half the detection limit XND = ½ DL What are the ramifications of this in terms of the subsequent analysis? 450b 0119 DL Replacement Methods:

Sample Data Set # 1 The impact on statistical parameters such as the mean and the variance is not clear Complete Data Censored Data Assigned 1/ 2 Detection Limits Mean 4.643 4.615 Variance 64.090 64.318 450b 0120 DL Replacement Methods  0 The third method is to assign each datum below the detection limit the value of 0 XND = 0 How will this substitution effect subsequent analysis? 450b 0121 DL Replacement Methods:

Sample Data Set # 1 It will result in an underestimate of the mean The effect on variance in general is not clear Here we see that the variance has been overestimated Complete Data Censored Data Assigned Zeros Mean 4.643 4.483 Variance 64.090 65.523 450b 0122 Atchison's Method Atchison's method, as presented in EPA QA/ G 9, also assigns each datum below the detection limit the value of 0 Atchison's method is presented with several complicated looking formulas... 450b 0123 Aitchison's Formulas Let X1, X2,..., Xm,..., Xn represent the data The first m values are above the detection limit ( DL) and the remaining ( n m) data points are below the DL X m X d i i m = =

1 1 X m n X d = s X m X m d i i m i i m 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 =

= =

   ( )

s m n s m n m n n X d d 2 2 2 1 1 1 =

  +

( )

( ) 450b 0124 DL Replacement Methods The data we just looked at were skewed and the detected values were large relative to the detection limits What happens when the data are symmetric and the detected values are relatively close to the detection limits? 450b 0125 DL Replacement Methods:

Sample Data Set # 2 Suppose we received these data from our analytical laboratory 1.752 < 1.000 1.418 1.477 < 1.000 < 1.000 1.289 1.498 < 1.000 < 1.000 1.327 < 1.000 1.060 < 1.000 < 1.000 < 1.000 1.045 < 1.000 1.563 1.148 450b 0126 DL Replacement Methods:

Sample Data Set # 2 Here we see that the impacts of different substitution schemes are greater with smaller values and fewer outliers These data sets illustrate the varying impacts DL replacement methods have on parameter estimates Complete Data DL 1/ 2 DL Zero Mean 1.055 1.179 0.929 0.679 Variance 0.138 0.058 0.218 0.510 450b 0127 DL Replacement Methods The main advantage of the replacement of each datum below the detection limit with the same value is simplicity The substitutions are quite simple to perform,

can accomodate multiple detection limits,

and are easy to deal with in terms of the subsequent statistical analyses Choice of substitution value ( DL, 1/ 2 DL, or 0) should be based on the site conceptual model and objective of the analysis 450b 0128 DL Replacement Methods The main disadvantages are that these methods are crude and misrepresent both the average and the variability of the sample results ( sometimes in unexpected ways)

Depending on the situation, one needs to decide whether these simple substitutions will provide an adequate representation of the data for the task at hand 450b 0129 Estimator Adjustment Cohen's method provides adjusted estimates of the sample mean and standard deviation Estimates are based on the statistical technique of maximum likelihood estimation that accounts for censored data The adjusted mean and standard deviation can be used in parametric tests If less than 50% of the data are detected,

Cohen's method should not be used 450b 0130 Cohen's Method This method requires that the data without the nondetects be normally distributed This method also assumes that there is only one detection limit in the data These are both significant limitations for the use of this method Cohen's method is described in G 9 450b 0131 Cohen's Method Let X1, X2, ..., Xm, ..., Xn represent the n data points The first m values represent the data points above the detection limit ( DL) and the remaining ( n m) data points are below the DL 450b 0132 Cohen's Method Compute the sample mean Xd from the data above the detection limit Compute the sample variance, , from the data above the detection limit X m X d i i m = =

1 1 s X m X m d i i i m i m 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 =                 =

=

  s d 2 450b 0133 Cohen's Method Compute the following: and Use a table to find h n m n =   ( )

  =   s X DL d 2 d 2 $( )

   , h 450b 0134 Cohen's Method Estimate the corrected sample mean, , and sample variance, , to account for the data below the detection limit, as follows These adjusted statistics can be used in further statistical analyses of the data ( )

X X X d d =

$

  DL ( )

s s d 2 2 = +

$  X DL d 2 X 2 s 450b 0135 Cohen's Method on Sample Data Set # 2 Cohen's method applied to Data Set # 2 provides the following results These are more reasonable estimates than those provided by the simple substitution methods above Even though 50% were non detects Complete Data Cohen's method Mean 1.055 1.015 Variance 0.138 0.17 450b 0136 Trimmed Mean Trimming removes data in both tails of a data set to estimate a mean concentration This method comes from the field of Robust Statistics where the intent is to remove the effect of outliers its applicability to censored data is questionable For censored data, remove the non detects and an equivalent number of the greatest concentrations  then recalculate the mean 450b 0137 Winsorized Mean and Variance Winsorizing replaces data in the tails of a data set with the next most extreme data value This is performed in both tails of the data ( e. g.,

if m non detects are replaced by the next highest value, then the m highest values are replaced by the next lowest value)

Winsorizing creates adjusted estimates of the sample mean and variance accounting for non detects 450b 0138 Other Methods Another possible way to deal with the data below detection limits is through the use of imputation jittering distributional regression/ correlation expert judgment There must be good justification for the imputation method, and documentation should always be provided 450b 0139 Imputing Censored Data Expert opinion and regression/ correlation approaches can be used when:

There is relevant historic knowledge that can be used to build quantitative or qualitative relationships between variables This could include background concentration data, correlations with other analytes, or physical system indicators ( e. g., alkalinity impact on alkaline earth metals) 450b 0140 Maximum Likelihood Estimation Another approach is to use MLE to estimate parameters of the underlying distribution while accounting for non detects in the estimation procedure.

This method is often used in survival analysis Cohen's method is a MLE method that assumes normality and a single detection limit, and assumes that all reported observations are greater than that limit 450b 0141 Imputing Censored Data Another potential advantage of the MLE method is that it accommodates fitting distributions with a point mass at zero Effectively, this assumes that some of the samples might be analyte free These are not used often, but perhaps should be for chemicals that are not present in background 450b 0142


[Federal Register: September 28, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 187)]
[Notices]
[Page 59706-59707]
[DOCID:fr28se10-63]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13836-000]

Medicine Bow Hydro, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Competing Applications

September 21, 2010.
    On August 30, 2010, Medicine Bow Hydro, LLC filed an application
for a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power
Act (FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of the Medicine Bow
Pumped Storage Project (Medicine Bow Project) to be located in Carbon
County, Idaho. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is
to grant the permit holder priority to file a license application
during the permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the
permit holder to perform any land-disturbing activities or otherwise
enter upon lands or waters owned by others without the owners' express
permission.
    The proposed project will consist of the following: (1) A 9,200-
foot-circumference, 60-foot-high earth or rockfilled embankment;
creating an 88-acre upper reservoir with a storage capacity of 8,750-
acre-foot at an elevation of 8,375 feet mean sea level (msl); (2) a
1,480-foot-long, 210-foot-high earth and rockfill or concrete-face
rockfill dam; creating an 121-acre lower reservoir with a storage
capacity of 8,900-acre-foot at an elevation of 7,325 feet msl; (3) a
19-foot-diameter, 600-foot-long concrete-lined low pressure tunnel; (4)
a 19-foot-diameter, 5,060-foot-long high pressure concrete-lined
tunnel; (5) a 280-foot-long, 70-foot-wide, 120-foot-high powerhouse
containing one reversible 200-megawatt (MW) turbine/generator unit, and
two 100-MW turbine/generator units, for a total installed capacity of
400 MW; (6) a 2,600-foot-long, 22.5-foot-diameter tailrace between the
powerhouse and the lower reservoir; (7) an approximately 6.8-mile-long,
230-kilovolt transmission line connecting the powerhouse to the
existing Miracle Mile-Cheyenne transmission line; and (8) appurtenant
facilities. The estimated annual generation of the Medicine Bow Project
would be 1,226,400 megawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Matthew Shapiro, Gridflex Energy, LLC, 1210 W.
Franklin Street, Ste. 2, Boise, ID 83702; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Jennifer Harper<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-
filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support. Although the Commission strongly encourages electronic filing,
documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an original and
seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http: //www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-13836-000) in the docket number field to
access the

document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24230 Filed 9-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 43084]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17803]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-2131-000]

Milo Wind Project, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Milo Wind Project, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is July 29, 2015.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 9, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-17803 Filed 7-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P