[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 83 (Tuesday, April 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25334-25336]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10077]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-69438; File No. SR-CBOE-2013-037]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change Relating to Fees for the BBO Data Feed for CBOE
Listed Options

April 23, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 16, 2013, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (the ``Exchange'' or
``CBOE'') proposes to amend the fee schedule of Market Data Express,
LLC (``MDX''), an affiliate of CBOE, for the BBO Data Feed for CBOE
listed options (``BBO Data Feed'' or ``Data''). The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's
Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the fees
charged by MDX for the BBO Data Feed and to make several clarifying
changes to the MDX fee schedule.\3\ The BBO Data Feed is a real-time,
low latency data feed that includes CBOE ``BBO data'' and last sale
data.\4\ The BBO and last sale data contained in the BBO Data Feed is
identical to the data that CBOE sends to the Options Price Reporting
Authority (``OPRA'') for redistribution to the public.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The BBO Data Feed and the fees charged by MDX for the BBO
Data Feed were established in March 2011. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 63997 (March 1, 2011), 76 FR 12388 (March 7, 2011).
    \4\ The BBO Data Feed includes the ``best bid and offer,'' or
``BBO'', consisting of all outstanding quotes and standing orders at
the best available price level on each side of the market, with
aggregate size (``BBO data,'' sometimes referred to as ``top-of-book
data''). Data with respect to executed trades is referred to as
``last sale'' data.
    \5\ The Exchange notes that MDX makes available to Customers the
BBO data and last sale data that is included in the BBO Data Feed no
earlier than the time at which the Exchange sends that data to OPRA.
A ``Customer'' is any entity that receives the BBO Data Feed
directly from MDX's system and then distributes it either internally
or externally to Subscribers. A ``Subscriber'' is a person (other
than an employee of a Customer) that receives the BBO Data Feed from
a Customer for its own internal use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The BBO Data Feed also includes certain data that is not included
in the data sent to OPRA, namely, (i) totals of customer versus non-
customer contracts at the BBO, (ii) All-or-None contingency orders
priced better than or equal to the BBO, (iii) BBO data and last sale
data for complex strategies (e.g., spreads, straddles, buy-writes,
etc.) (``Spread Data''), (iv) BBO data and last sale data for Flexible
Exchange (``FLEX'') options traded on the CBOE FLEX Hybrid Trading
System, including BBO data and last sale data for FLEX complex
strategies (collectively, ``FLEX BBO data''), and (v) expected opening
price (``EOP'') and expected opening size (``EOS'') information that is
disseminated prior to the opening of the market and during trading
rotations (collectively, ``EOP/EOS data'').\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Exchange identified the inclusion of FLEX BBO data and
EOP/EOS data in the BBO Data Feed in a proposed rule change filed in
January 2013. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68696 (January
18, 2013), 78 FR 5527 (January 25, 2013). MDX also makes the FLEX
BBO data available as a separate data feed at no charge to any
Customer that wishes to subscribe to only that data. EOP/EOS data is
not offered separate from the BBO Data Feed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    MDX currently charges Customers a ``direct connect fee'' of $3,500
per connection per month and a ``per user fee'' of $25 per month per
``Authorized User'' or ``Device'' for receipt of the BBO Data Feed by
Subscribers.\7\ Either a CBOE Trading Permit Holder or a non-CBOE
Trading Permit Holder may be a Customer. All Customers are assessed the
same fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ An ``Authorized User'' is defined as an individual user (an
individual human being) who is uniquely identified (by user ID and
confidential password or other unambiguous method reasonably
acceptable to MDX) and authorized by a Customer to access the BBO
Data Feed supplied by the Customer. A ``Device'' is defined as any
computer, workstation or other item of equipment, fixed or
portable,that receives, accesses and/or displays data in visual,
audible or other form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to eliminate both the direct connect fee and
the per user fee and replace them with a ``data fee'', payable by a
Customer, of $5,000 per month for internal use and external
redistribution of the BBO Data Feed. A ``Customer'' is any entity that
receives the BBO Data Feed directly from MDX's system or through a
connection to MDX provided by an approved redistributor (i.e., a market
data vendor or an extranet service provider) and then distributes it
internally and/or externally. The data fee would entitle a Customer to
provide the BBO Data Feed to an unlimited number of internal users and
Devices within the Customer. The data fee would also entitle a Customer
to distribute externally the BBO Data Feed to other Customers. A
Customer receiving the BBO Data Feed from another Customer would be
assessed the data fee by MDX and would be entitled to distribute the
Data internally and/or externally.\8\ All Customers would have

the same rights to utilize the Data (i.e., distribute the Data
internally and/or externally) as long as the Customer has entered into
an agreement with MDX for the Data and pays the data fee. Either a CBOE
Trading Permit Holder or a non-CBOE Trading Permit Holder may be a
Customer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ A Customer may choose to receive the Data from another
Customer rather than directly from MDX's system because it does not
want to or is not equipped to manage the technology necessary to
establish a direct connection to MDX. In addition, a Customer is not
subject to the MDX Port Fee if it does not establish a port
connection to an MDX server.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to make several clarifying changes to
the MDX fee schedule. MDX charges Customers a monthly fee of $500 for
each port connection to MDX to receive the BBO Data Feed (``Port
Fee'').\9\ The Exchange proposes to move the Port Fee into a new
section of the MDX fee schedule called Systems Fees. The Exchange
proposes to add a description of the Port Fee to the Definitions
section of the MDX fee schedule. The Exchange proposes to reflect on
the MDX fee schedule that there are no data fees for the FLEX BBO data
feed. The Exchange proposes to clarify that MDX will not charge the
data fee or the Port Fee for any calendar month in which a Customer
commences receipt of Data after the 15th day of the month or
discontinues receipt of the Data before the 15th day of the month. The
Exchange also proposes to include in the MDX fee schedule provisions
relating to invoicing and late payments. Lastly, the Exchange proposes
to remove the definition of per user fee from the MDX fee schedule
consistent with the elimination of that fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66486 (February 28,
2012), 77 FR 13166 (March 5, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed fee change is to take effect on May 1, 2013.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \10\ in general, and, in particular, with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act \11\ in that it provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among users and
recipients of the Data, and with Section 6(b)(5) \12\ of the Act in
that it is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between them.
The Exchange believes the proposed data fee is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because it would apply equally to all
Customers. All Customers would have the same rights to utilize the Data
(i.e., distribute the Data internally and/or externally) as long as the
Customer has entered into an agreement with MDX for the Data and pays
the data fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposed fee is reasonable because it
compares favorably to fees that other markets charge for similar
products. For example, the Exchange believes NASDAQ OMX PHLX charges
Internal Distributors a monthly fee of $4,000 per organization and
External Distributors a monthly fee of $5,000 per organization for its
``TOPO Plus Orders'' data feed, which like the BBO Data Feed includes
top-of-book data (including orders, quotes and trades) and other market
data. The International Securities Exchange offers a ``Top Quote
Feed'', which includes top-of-book data, and a separate ``Spread
Feed'', which like the BBO Data Feed includes order and quote data for
complex strategies. The Exchange believes ISE charges distributors of
its Top Quote Feed a base monthly fee of $3,000 and distributors of its
Spread Feed a base monthly fee of $3,000. The Exchange notes that the
BBO Data Feed also competes with products offered by the NYSE entitled
NYSE ArcaBook for Amex Options and NYSE ArcaBook for Arca Options that
include top-of-book and last sale data similar to the data in the BBO
Data Feed. As noted above, the BBO Data Feed also includes FLEX BBO and
EOP/EOS data as well as other data.
    For the reasons cited above, the Exchange believes the proposed fee
for the BBO Data Feed is equitable, reasonable and not unfairly
discriminatory. In addition, the Exchange believes that no substantial
countervailing basis exists to support a finding that the proposed
terms and fee for the BBO Data Feed fails to meet the requirements of
the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. To the contrary, the market for
options orders and executions is already highly competitive and the
Exchange's proposal is itself pro-competitive as described below.
    The Exchange believes competition provides an effective constraint
on the market data fees that the Exchange, through MDX, has the ability
and the incentive to charge. CBOE has a compelling need to attract
order flow from market participants in order to maintain its share of
trading volume. This compelling need to attract order flow imposes
significant pressure on CBOE to act reasonably in setting its fees for
market data, particularly given that the market participants that will
pay such fees often will be the same market participants from whom CBOE
must attract order flow. These market participants include broker-
dealers that control the handling of a large volume of customer and
proprietary order flow. Given the portability of order flow from one
exchange to another, any exchange that sought to charge unreasonably
high data fees would risk alienating many of the same customers on
whose orders it depends for competitive survival. CBOE currently
competes with ten options exchanges (including CBOE's affiliate, C2
Options Exchange) for order flow.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ The Commission has previously made a finding that the
options industry is subject to significant competitive forces. See
e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59949 (May 20, 2009), 74
FR 25593 (May 28, 2009) (SR-ISE-2009-97) (order approving ISE's
proposal to establish fees for a real-time depth of market data
offering).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CBOE is constrained in pricing the BBO Data Feed by the
availability to market participants of alternatives to purchasing the
BBO Data Feed. CBOE must consider the extent to which market
participants would choose one or more alternatives instead of
purchasing the exchange's data. For example, the BBO data and last sale
data available in the BBO Data Feed is included in the OPRA data feed.
The OPRA data is widely distributed and relatively inexpensive, thus
constraining CBOE's ability to price the BBO Data Feed. In this
respect, the OPRA data feed, which includes the exchange's transaction
information, is a significant alternative to the BBO Data Feed product.
    Further, other options exchanges can and have produced their own
top-of-book products, and thus are sources of potential competition for
MDX. As noted above, NASDAQ OMX PHLX, ISE and NYSE offer market data
products that compete with the BBO Data Feed. In addition, the Exchange
believes other options exchanges may currently offer top-of-book market
data products for a fee or for free.
    The Exchange believes that the BBO Data Feed offered by MDX will
help attract new users and new order flow to the Exchange, thereby
improving the Exchange's ability to compete in the market for options
order flow and executions.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\14\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2013-037 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2013-037. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2013-037 and should be
submitted on or before May 21, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-10077 Filed 4-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 14703]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05798]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR14-22-000]

Valero Terminaling and Distribution Company; Notice of Petition
for Temporary Waiver

    Take notice that on March 4, 2014, pursuant to Rule 204 of the
Commission's Rules of Practices and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.202, Valero
Terminaling and Distribution Company (VTDC) filed a petition requesting
that the Commission grant a temporary waiver of the Interstate Commerce
Act's section 6 and section 20 tariff filing and reporting requirements
applicable to interstate common carrier pipelines. VTDC's waiver
request applies to the Turpin Pipeline system which VTDC owns and
operates, as explained more fully in the petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in this proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must
serve a copy of that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on March 25, 2014.

    Dated: March 11, 2014.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-05798 Filed 3-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on August 14, 2002

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-99-5848

________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:  Lineas Aereas Privadas Argentinas, S.A. (LAPA)		Date Filed:
July 17, 2002

Relief requested: Renew exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 41301 to engage in
scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail
between Buenos Aires, Argentina, and Atlanta, Georgia; and to conduct
charters subject to 14 CFR Part 212 of our rules.

If renewal, date and citation of last action:  August 2, 2001, in this
docket

Applicant representative:  Gregory S. Levine<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings:  None filed

	DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved								Action date:  August 14, 2002

Effective dates of authority granted:  August 14, 2002-August 14, 2003

Basis for approval (bilateral agreement/reciprocity):  Bilateral
aviation agreement between the United States and Argentina (the
Agreement)

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to the
terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:  X Standard exemption
conditions (attached)

Special conditions/Partial grant/Denial basis/Remarks:  LAPA may not
conduct U.S. operations with its own aircraft and crews without further
order of the Department.  The authority granted above is subject to the
prior approval requirement for passenger charter operations contained in
Order 95-2-29.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) the applicant was qualified to perform the
proposed operations; (2) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (3) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (4) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted/deferred/dismissed, we denied all requests in
the referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR §
385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date of
issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and the
filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

										        Attachment A

FOREIGN AIR CARRIER CONDITIONS OF AUTHORITY

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the holder shall:

(1)  Not conduct any operations unless it holds a currently effective
authorization from its homeland for such operations, and it has filed a
copy of such authorization with the Department;

(2)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration, including, but not limited to, 14 CFR Parts 129, 91, and
36, and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning
security;

(3)  Comply with the requirements for minimum insurance coverage
contained in 14 CFR Part 205, and, prior to the commencement of any
operations under this authority, file evidence of such coverage, in the
form of a completed OST Form 6411, with the Federal Aviation
Administration’s Program Management Branch (AFS-260), Flight Standards
Service (any changes to, or termination of, insurance also shall be
filed with that office);

(4)  Not operate aircraft under this authority unless it complies with
operational safety requirements at least equivalent to Annex 6 of the
Chicago Convention;

(5)  Conform to the airworthiness and airman competency requirements of
its Government for international air services;

(6)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 203,
concerning waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(7)  Agree that operations under this authority constitute a waiver of
sovereign immunity, for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1605(a), but only with
respect to those actions or proceedings instituted against it in any
court or other tribunal in the United States that are:

   (a)  based on its operations in international air transportation
that, according to the contract of carriage, include a point in the
United States as a point of origin, point of destination, or agreed
stopping place, or for which the contract of carriage was purchased in
the United States; or

   (b)  based on a claim under any international agreement or treaty
cognizable in any court or other tribunal of the United States.

In this condition, the term "international air transportation" means
"international transportation" as defined by the Warsaw Convention,
except that all States shall be considered to be High Contracting
Parties for the purpose of this definition;

(8)  Except as specifically authorized by the Department, originate or
terminate all flights to/from the United States in its homeland;

(9)  Comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 217, concerning the
reporting of scheduled, nonscheduled, and charter data;

(10)  If charter operations are authorized, comply  (except as otherwise
provided in the applicable bilateral agreement) with the Department's
rules governing charters (including 14 CFR Parts 212 and 380); and

(11)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department, with all applicable orders or regulations of other U.S.
agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the United States.

U.S. Department of Transportation

Office of the Secretary of Transportation								        (41301/40109)
9/98

  We note that LAPA sought authority for a two year period.  However, as
is our usual practice in conferring exemption authority in the
circumstances presented, we are limiting the term of authority to one
year.  LAPA may, of course, seek renewal of this authority in accordance
with the Department’s regulations.

  Argentina is currently a Category 2 country under the FAA’s
International Aviation Safety Assessment Program (IASA).

  While the Agreement provides for the operation of Third and Fourth
Freedom all-cargo charters without limitation, the Agreement places a
numerical limit on the number of Third and Fourth Freedom passenger
operations that can be operated by the carriers of Argentina.  The
Agreement does not provide for the operation of Fifth Freedom passenger
or cargo charter operations, and all such charters continue to be
subject to prior approval under Part 212 of our rules.


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53506-53507]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21460]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Reporting of
Information Using Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval for to renew an information
collection. The FAA issues Special Airworthiness Information Bulletins
(SAIBs) to alert, educate, and make recommendations to the aviation
community and individual aircraft owners/operators on ways to improve
products. They may include requests for reporting of results from
requested actions/inspections.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by November 10, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy DePaepe at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0731.
    Title: Reporting of Information Using Special Airworthiness
Information Bulletin.
    Form Numbers: There are no FAA forms associated with this
collection.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: A special airworthiness information bulletin (SAIB) is
an important tool that helps the FAA to gather information to determine
whether an airworthiness directive is necessary. An SAIB alerts,
educates, and make recommendations to the aviation community and
individual aircraft owners and operators about ways to improve the
safety of a product. It contains non-regulatory information and
guidance that is advisory and may include recommended actions or
inspections with a request for voluntary reporting of inspection
results.

    Respondents: Approximately 1,120 owners/operators.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 5 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 467 hours.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Kathy
DePaepe, Room 126B, Federal Aviation Administration, ASP-110, 6500 S.
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 3, 2014.
Albert R. Spence,
FAA Assistant Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises
Business Services Division, ASP-110.
[FR Doc. 2014-21460 Filed 9-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16808-16809]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06194]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-94475; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2021-67]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on Proceedings To
Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To
List and Trade Shares of the One River Carbon Neutral Bitcoin Trust
Under NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-E

March 18, 2022.
    On September 20, 2021, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to list and trade
shares of the One River Carbon Neutral Bitcoin Trust under NYSE Arca
Rule 8.201-E (Commodity-Based Trust Shares). The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the Federal Register on October 5,
2021.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93171 (Sept. 29,
2021), 86 FR 55073. Comments on the proposed rule change can be
found at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2021-67/srnysearca202167.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 10, 2021, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\4\
the Commission designated a longer period within which to approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule
change.\5\ On December 21, 2021, the Commission instituted proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \6\ to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93553, 86 FR 64276
(Nov. 17, 2021).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93840, 86 FR 73826
(Dec. 28, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \8\ provides that, after initiating
proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change not later than 180 days after the
date of publication of notice of filing of the proposed rule change.
The Commission may extend the period for issuing an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change, however, by not more than 60
days if the Commission determines that a longer period is appropriate
and publishes the reasons for such determination. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on October 5,
2021.\9\ The 180th day after publication of the proposed rule change is
April 3, 2022. The Commission is extending the time period for
approving or disapproving the proposed rule change for an additional 60
days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \9\ See supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer
period within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the
proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the
proposed rule change and the issues raised in the comments that have
been submitted in connection therewith. Accordingly, the Commission,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\10\ designates June 2, 2022,
as the date by which the Commission shall either approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change (File No. SR-NYSEArca-2021-67).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-06194 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 138 (Thursday, July 22, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38538-38540]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15473]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0156; Project Identifier AD-2020-01594-T;
Amendment 39-21650; AD 2021-15-03]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation (Gulfstream) Model GVII-G500
airplanes. This AD results from flap yoke fittings with design features
that cause decreased fatigue life. This AD requires replacing the flap
inboard and outboard yoke fitting assemblies and establishing a 20,000
flight cycle life limit for the fittings. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective August 26, 2021.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of August 26,
2021.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, Technical Publications Dept.,
P.O. Box 2206, Savannah, GA 31402; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>website: https://www.gulfstream.com/en/customer-support/. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, MO 64106. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2021-0156.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0156; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, any
comments received, and other information. The address for Docket
Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Johnson, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Atlanta ACO Branch, FAA, 1701 Columbia Ave., College Park, GA
30337; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation (Gulfstream) Model GVII-G500 airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on May 7, 2021 (86 FR 24546). The
NPRM was prompted by a failure that occurred during flight testing of a
Gulfstream Model GVII-G500 airplane, when the aircraft was configuring
for a steep approach test point, the crew received a flap failure
message. After landing, inspection revealed that the left-hand flap
track 'B' yoke had become disconnected due to structural failure.
Gulfstream's investigation to determine the root cause of the failure
revealed that the flap yoke fittings for certain serial-numbered
Gulfstream Model GVII-G500 airplanes have design features that cause
decreased fatigue life. In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require
replacing the flap inboard and outboard yoke fitting assemblies and
revising the Airworthiness Limitations Instructions of your existing
aircraft maintenance manual (AMM) to incorporate a 20,000 flight cycle
life limit. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the costs.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety
requires adopting this AD as proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. This AD is
adopted as proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Gulfstream GVII-G500 Aircraft Service Change No.
032, Initial Issue, dated November 20, 2020 (Gulfstream ASC No. 032).
This service information specifies procedures for replacing the flap
inboard and outboard yoke fitting assemblies and upper bushings. This
service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in ADDRESSES.

Other Related Service Information

    The FAA reviewed Gulfstream GVII-500 Customer Bulletin No. 045,
Initial Issue, dated November 20, 2020. This service information
specifies the compliance time and additional information for Gulfstream
ASC No. 032. The FAA also reviewed Gulfstream Aerospace GVII-G500
Aircraft Maintenance Manual Document Number GAC-AC-GVII-G500-AMM-0001,
Revision 7, dated December 15, 2020. This document contains revised
airworthiness limitations, maintenance checks, and inspections.

Differences Between This AD and the Service Information

    Gulfstream ASC No. 032 contains actions labeled ``Required for
Compliance'' (RC), and the language in Gulfstream ASC No. 032 and in
paragraph (h)(3) of this AD indicates that operators must comply with
all actions labeled RC for compliance with this AD. However, this AD
does not require all of the steps in Gulfstream ASC No. 032 that are
labeled as RC. Operators only need to comply with the RC steps
specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 85 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace the flap inboard and outboard   83.5 work-hours x $85.00       $8,015.00      $15,112.50   $1,284,562.50
 yoke fitting assemblies and update      per hour = $7,097.50.
 the existing AMM.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and

procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air
commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because
it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2021-15-03 Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation: Amendment 39-21650;
Docket No. FAA-2021-0156; Project Identifier AD-2020-01594-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective August 26, 2021.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Model GVII-
G500 airplanes, serial numbers 72001 through 72085, certificated in
any category.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 5753, Trailing Edge
Flaps.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD results from flap yoke fittings with design features
that cause decreased fatigue life. The FAA is issuing this AD to
prevent failure of the flap yoke fitting. The unsafe condition, if
not addressed, could result in failure of the flap yoke fitting
during flap transition, which could cause the flaps to stop moving.
This, combined with additional failures in the flap actuator force
limiter or flap yoke actuator disconnect, could result in asymmetric
flap positions leading to a loss of airplane control.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    (1) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD or
within 500 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, replace each flap yoke fitting assembly by
following Sections III.A.2 through III.D of the Modification
Instructions in Gulfstream GVII-G500 Aircraft Service Change No.
032, Initial Issue, dated November 20, 2020.
    (2) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, revise
the existing Airworthiness Limitations section of the Instructions
for Continued Airworthiness or aircraft inspection program for your
airplane by establishing a life limit of 20,000 flight cycles for
each flap yoke fitting part number 72P5755095A001, 72P5755096A001,
72P5755097A001, and 72P5755098A001.

    Note 1 to paragraph (g)(2): Section 05-10-10 of Gulfstream
Aerospace GVII-G500 Aircraft Maintenance Manual Document Number GAC-
AC-GVII-G500-AMM-0001, Revision 7, dated December 15, 2020, contains
the life limit in paragraph (g)(2) of this AD.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in Related Information.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as Required for Compliance (RC), the following provisions apply.
    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. An AMOC is required for any deviations to RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures.
    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.

(i) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Jeffrey Johnson,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Atlanta ACO Branch, FAA, 1701 Columbia
Ave., College Park, GA 30337; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (404) 474-
5606; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Gulfstream GVII-G500 Aircraft Service Change No. 032,
Initial Issue, dated November 20, 2020.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation service information
identified in this AD, contact Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation,
Technical Publications Dept., P.O. Box 2206, Savannah, GA 31402;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>website: https://www.gulfstream.com/en/customer-support/.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, MO 64106. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on July 15, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-15473 Filed 7-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 4, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 191)]
[Notices]
[Page 57916-57918]
[DOCID:fr04oc05-110]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-52513; File No. SR-PCX-2005-106]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Rescinding
Pilot Rules Relating to the Waiver of the California Ethics Standards
for Neutral Arbitrators in Contractual Arbitration and Section 1281.92
of the California Code of Civil Procedure

September 27, 2005.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 20, 2005, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (``PCX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by PCX. PCX has designated
this proposal as ``non-controversial'' pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act,\3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\
which renders the proposed rule change effective immediately upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    PCX is proposing to amend the PCX Options and PCX Equities, Inc.
(``PCXE'') arbitration rules to rescind the pilot rules (the ``Pilot
Rules'') relating to the waiver of the California Ethics Standards for
Neutral Arbitrators in Contractual Arbitration (the ``California
Standards'') and the waiver of California Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1281.92 (``CCCP Claims''). The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the PCX's Web site (http://www.pacificex.com), at the

PCX's Office

of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the PCX included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The PCX has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to rescind the Pilot
Rules relating to the waiver of the California Standards and the CCCP
Claims.
    Effective July 1, 2002, the California Judicial Council adopted the
California Standards,\5\ which contain extensive disclosure and
disqualification requirements for arbitrators. The California Standards
imposed disclosure and disqualification requirements on arbitrators
that conflict with the disclosure requirements of the PCX and PCXE.
Because PCX and PCXE could not administer its arbitration program in
accordance with its own rules and comply with the new California
Standards at the same time, the PCX initially suspended the appointment
of arbitrators.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ California Rules of Court, Division VI of the Appendix.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In November 2002, PCX implemented the Pilot Rules providing that if
parties to an arbitration who are customers (or, in certain
circumstances, associated persons) waived application of the California
Standards to their arbitration proceeding, then the firm would be
required to waive the application of the California Standards. Under
such a waiver, the arbitration proceeds under existing PCX and PCXE
rules, which already contains extensive disclosure requirements and
provisions for challenging arbitrators with potential conflicts of
interest. PCX will decline jurisdiction and dismiss and refund fees
paid to PCX and PCXE by the parties for any arbitration claims in which
any of the parties to arbitration fails to sign the applicable waivers.
    On March 1, 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit issued its decision in Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. v.
Grunwald.\6\ The Ninth Circuit held that the Exchange Act preempts
application of the California Standards. On May 23, 2005, the Supreme
Court of California also held that the Act preempts application of the
California Standards.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 400 F.3d 1119 (9th Cir. 2005).
    \7\ Jevne v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, S121532
(CA Sup. Ct. May 23, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    PCX has determined that the Pilot Rules should be rescinded prior
to its expiration as they are no longer necessary. Specifically with
the recent decisions in Grunwald and Jevne, both the Ninth Circuit and
the California Supreme Court have found that the Act preempts the
application of the California Standards. Consequently, the PCX believes
that it can once again appoint arbitrators without requiring a waiver
of the California Standards.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ in
particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade by ensuring that Options Trading Permits Holders,
Options Trading Permits Firms, Exchange Trading Permits Holders and the
public have a fair and impartial forum for the resolution of their
disputes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited
nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing proposed rule change has become effective upon filing
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder \11\ because the proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest. As required under
Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\12\ the PCX provided the Commission with written
notice of PCX's intent to file the proposed rule change along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five
business days prior to the filing date of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally may
not become operative for 30 days after the date of its filing.\13\
However Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \14\ permits the Commission to designate
a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection
investors and the public interest. The PCX has requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed rule
change will become immediately effective upon filing. The Commission
believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest.\15\ For these reasons,
the Commission designates that the proposed rule change has become
effective and operative immediately.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Id.
    \14\ Id.
    \15\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

Filed No. SR-PCX-2005-106 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-9303.
    All submissions should refer to File No. SR-PCX-2005-106. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the PCX. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File No. SR-PCX-2005-106 and should be submitted on or before October
25, 2005.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-19773 Filed 10-3-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 24 (Monday, February 6, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7580-7583]
[FR Doc No: 2023-02406]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1557; Airspace Docket No. 22-ACE-21]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of Class D and E Airspace and Revocation of Class E
Airspace; Topeka, KS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends the Class D and E airspace and revokes
Class E airspace at Topeka, KS. These actions are the result of
biennial airspace reviews. The name of Topeka Regional Airport, Topeka,
KS, and the geographic coordinates of Philip Billard Municipal Airport,
Topeka, KS, are also being updated to coincide with the FAA's
aeronautical database.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, April 20, 2023. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 1 CFR
part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11 and
publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the

Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends the Class D airspace, the Class E surface airspace, and
the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
at Topeka Regional Airport, Topeka, KS, and Philip Billard Municipal
Airport, Topeka, KS, and removes the Class E airspace designated as an
extension to Class D and Class E surface airspace areas at Philip
Billard Municipal Airport to support instrument flight rule operations
at these airports.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register (87 FR 75533; December 9, 2022) for Docket No. FAA-
2022-1557 to amend the Class D and E airspace and revoke Class E
airspace at Topeka, KS. Interested parties were invited to participate
in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the
proposal to the FAA. No comments were received.
    Class D and E airspace designations are published in paragraphs
5000, 6002, 6004, and 6005 of FAA Order JO 7400.11G, dated August 19,
2022, and effective September 15, 2022, which is incorporated by
reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and E airspace designations
listed in this document will be published subsequently in FAA Order JO
7400.11.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September
15, 2022. FAA Order JO 7400.11G is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11G lists Class
A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

Differences From the NPRM

    Vertical limits were inadvertently included in the airspace legal
descriptions for the Class E surface airspace at Topeka Regional
Airport, Topeka, KS, and Philip Billard Municipal Airport, Topeka, KS.
The vertical limits were not included in The Proposal of the NPRM, and
the vertical limits are not part of the current airspace legal
descriptions. Accordingly there is no impact on the airspace, and the
vertical limits are not included in this action.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 71:
    Amends the Class D airspace at Topeka Regional Airport, Topeka, KS,
by removing the Forbes Field Airport ILS and RIPLY LOM and the
associated extensions from the airspace legal description; updates the
header of the airspace legal description from ``Topeka, Forbes Field
Airport, KS'' to ``Topeka, KS'' to comply with changes to FAA Order JO
7400.2N, Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters; removes the city
associated with the airport in the airspace legal description to comply
with changes to FAA Order JO 7400.2N; updates the name of the airport
(previously Forbes Field Airport) to coincide with the FAA's
aeronautical database; and replaces the outdated terms ``Notice to
Airmen'' with ``Notice to Air Missions'' and ``Airport/Facility
Directory'' with ``Chart Supplement'';
    Amends the Class D airspace at Philip Billard Municipal Airport by
adding an extension 1 mile each side of the 002[deg] bearing from the
airport extending from the 4-mile radius of the airport to 4.1 miles
north of the airport; adds an extension 1 mile each side of the
134[deg] bearing from the Philip Billard Muni: RWY 13-LOC extending
from the 4-mile radius of the airport to 4.1 miles southeast of the
Philip Billard Muni: RWY 13-LOC; adds an extension 1 mile each side of
the 314[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 4-mile radius
of the airport to 4.2 miles northwest of the airport; updates the
header of the airspace legal description from ``Topeka, Philip Billard
Municipal Airport, KS'' to ``Topeka, KS'' to comply with changes to FAA
Order JO 7400.2N; removes the city associated with the airport to
comply with changes to FAA Order JO 7400.2N; updates the geographic
coordinates of the airport to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical
database; removes Forbes Field, KS, from the airspace legal description
as it is not required; and replaces the outdated terms ``Notice to
Airmen'' with ``Notice to Air Missions'' and ``Airport/Facility
Directory'' with ``Chart Supplement'';
    Amends the Class E surface airspace at Topeka Regional Airport by
removing the Forbes Field Airport ILS and RIPLY LOM and the associated
extensions from the airspace legal description; updates the header of
the airspace legal description from ``Topeka, Forbes Field Airport,
KS'' to ``Topeka, KS'' to comply with changes to FAA Order JO 7400.2N;
removes the city associated with the airport in the airspace legal
description to comply with changes to FAA Order JO 7400.2N; updates the
name of the airport (previously Forbes Field Airport) to coincide with
the FAA's aeronautical database; and adds missing part-time language to
the airspace legal description;
    Amends the Class E surface airspace at Philip Billard Municipal
Airport by adding an extension 1 mile each side of the 002[deg] bearing
from the airport extending from the 4-mile radius of the airport to 4.1
miles north of the airport; adds an extension 1 mile each side of the
134[deg] bearing from the Philip Billard Muni: RWY 13-LOC extending
from the 4-mile radius of the airport to 4.1 miles southeast of the
Philip Billard Muni: RWY 13-LOC; adds an extension 1 mile each side of
the 314[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 4-mile radius
of the airport to 4.2 miles northwest of the airport; updates the
header of the airspace legal description from ``Topeka, Philip Billard
Municipal Airport, KS'' to ``Topeka, KS'' to comply with changes to FAA
Order JO 7400.2N; removes the city associated with the airport to
comply with changes to FAA Order JO 7400.2N; updates the geographic
coordinates of the airport to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical
database; removes Forbes Field, KS, from the airspace legal description
as it is not required; and replaces the outdated terms ``Notice to
Airmen'' with ``Notice to Air Missions'' and ``Airport/Facility
Directory'' with ``Chart Supplement'';
    Removes the Class E airspace designated as an extension to Class D
and Class E surface airspace area at Philip Billard Municipal Airport
as it is no longer required;

    Amends the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface at Topeka Regional Airport by removing the Forbes Field ILS
and associated extension from the airspace legal description; adds an
extension 1 mile each side of the 040[deg] bearing from the airport
extending from the 7.4-mile radius of the airport to 12.8 miles
northeast of the airport; adds an extension 3.9 miles each side of the
Forbes TACAN 124[deg] radial extending from the 7.4-mile radius of the
airport to 10.4 miles southwest of the Forbes TACAN; adds an extension
1 mile each side of the 220[deg] bearing from the airport extending
from the 7.4-mile radius of the airport to 12.8 miles southwest of the
airport; updates the header of the airspace legal description from
``Topeka, Forbes Field Airport, KS'' to ``Topeka, KS'' to comply with
changes to FAA Order JO 7400.2N; removes the city associated with the
airport in the airspace legal description to comply with changes to FAA
Order JO 7400.2N; updates the name of the airport (previously Forbes
Field Airport) to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database;
    And amends the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Philip Billard Municipal Airport by removing the
Topeka VORTAC, BILOY LOM, and Philip Billard Municipal Airport ILS
Localizer and the associated extensions from the airspace legal
description; adds an extension 1.5 miles each side of the 134[deg]
bearing from the Philip Billard Muni: RWY 13-LOC extending from the
6.5-mile radius of the airport to 8.1 miles southeast of the Philip
Billard Muni: RWY 13-LOC; adds an extension 3.8 miles each side of the
314[deg] bearing from the Philip Billard Muni: RWY 13-LOC extending
from the 6.5-mile radius of the airport to 10.9 miles northwest of the
Philip Billard Muni: RWY 13-LOC; updates the header of the airspace
legal description from ``Topeka, Philip Billard Municipal Airport, KS''
to ``Topeka, KS'' to comply with changes to FAA Order JO 7400.2N;
removes the city associated with the airport to comply with changes to
FAA Order JO 7400.2N; updates the geographic coordinates of the airport
to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database.
    This action is necessary due to biennial airspace reviews.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected
to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19,
2022, and effective September 15, 2022, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ACE KS D Topeka, KS [Amended]

Topeka Regional Airport, KS
    (Lat. 38[deg]57'03'' N, long. 95[deg]39'49'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,600 feet MSL within a 4.9-mile radius of Topeka Regional Airport.
This Class D airspace area is effective during the specific dates
and times established in advance by a Notice to Air Missions. The
effective dates and times will thereafter be continuously published
in the Chart Supplement.

ACE KS D Topeka, KS [Amended]

Philip Billard Municipal Airport, KS
    (Lat. 39[deg]04'08'' N, long. 95[deg]37'21'' W)
Philip Billard Muni: RWY 13-LOC
    (Lat. 39[deg]03'47'' N, long. 95[deg]36'42'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,400 feet MSL within a 4-mile radius of Philip Billard Municipal
Airport, excluding that airspace within the Topeka Regional Airport,
Topeka, KS, Class D and Class E surface airspace areas; and within 1
mile each side of the 002[deg] bearing from the airport extending
from the 4-mile radius to 4.1 miles north of the airport; and within
1 mile each side of the 134[deg] bearing from the Philip Billard
Muni: RWY 13-LOC extending from the 4-mile radius of the airport to
4.1 miles southwest of the Philip Billard Muni: RWY 13-LOC; and
within 1 mile each side of the 314[deg] bearing from the airport
extending from the 4-mile radius of the airport to 4.2 miles
northwest of the airport. This Class D airspace area is effective
during the specific dates and times established in advance by a
Notice to Air Missions. The effective dates and times will
thereafter be continuously published in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

ACE KS E2 Topeka, KS [Amended]

Topeka Regional Airport, KS
    (Lat. 38[deg]57'03'' N, long. 95[deg]39'49'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within a 4.9-
mile radius of Topeka Regional Airport. This Class E airspace area
is effective during the specific dates and times established in
advance by a Notice to Air Missions. The effective dates and times
will thereafter be continuously published in the Chart Supplement.

ACE KS E2 Topeka, KS [Amended]

Philip Billard Municipal Airport, KS
    (Lat. 39[deg]04'08'' N, long. 95[deg]37'21'' W)
Philip Billard Muni: RWY 13-LOC
    (Lat. 39[deg]03'47'' N, long. 95[deg]36'42'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within a 4-mile
radius of Philip Billard Municipal Airport, excluding that airspace
within the Topeka Regional Airport, Topeka, KS, Class D and Class E
surface airspace areas; and within 1 mile each side of the 002[deg]
bearing from the airport extending from the 4-mile radius to 4.1
miles north of the airport; and within 1 mile each side of the
134[deg] bearing from the Philip Billard Muni: RWY 13-LOC extending
from the 4-mile radius of the airport to 4.1 miles southwest of the
Philip Billard Muni: RWY 13-LOC; and within 1 mile each side of the
314[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 4-mile radius
of the airport to 4.2 miles

northwest of the airport. This Class E airspace area is effective
during the specific dates and times established in advance by a
Notice to Air Missions. The effective dates and times will
thereafter be continuously published in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to
a Class D or Class E Surface Area.

* * * * *

ACE KS E4 Topeka, Philip Billard Municipal Airport, KS [Remove]

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ACE KS E5 Topeka, KS [Amended]

Topeka Regional Airport, KS
    (Lat. 38[deg]57'03'' N, long. 95[deg]39'49'' W)
Forbes TACAN
    (Lat. 38[deg]56'51'' N, long. 95[deg]39'40'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7.4-mile radius of Topeka Regional Airport; and within 1
mile each side of the 040[deg] bearing from the airport extending
from the 7.4-mile radius of the airport to 12.8 miles northeast of
the airport; and within 3.9 miles each side of the Forbes TACAN
124[deg] radial extending from the 7.4-mile radius of the airport to
10.4 miles southeast of the Forbes TACAN; and within 1 mile each
side of the 220[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the
7.4-mile radius of the airport to 12.8 miles southwest of the
airport.

ACE KS E5 Topeka, KS [Amended]

Philip Billard Municipal Airport, KS
    (Lat. 39[deg]04'08'' N, long. 95[deg]37'21'' W)
Philip Billard Muni: RWY 13-LOC
    (Lat. 39[deg]03'47'' N, long. 95[deg]36'42'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of Philip Billard Municipal Airport; and
within 1.5 miles each side of the 134[deg] bearing from the Philip
Billard Muni: RWY 13-LOC extending from the 6.5-mile radius of the
airport to 8.1 miles southeast of the Philip Billard Muni: RWY 13-
LOC; and within 3.8 miles each side of the 314[deg] bearing from the
Philip Billard Muni: RWY 13-LOC extending from the 6.5-mile radius
of the airport to 10.9 miles from the Philip Billard Muni: RWY 13-
LOC.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on February 1, 2023.
Martin A. Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2023-02406 Filed 2-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: June 12, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 112)]
[Notices]
[Page 33738]
[DOCID:fr12jn06-67]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-303-003]

Stingray Pipeline Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Compliance Filing

June 6, 2006.
    Take notice that, on May 30, 2006, Stingray Pipeline Company,
L.L.C. submitted a compliance filing pursuant to a letter order issued
on May 10, 2006 in Docket No. RP06-303-000.
    Stingray Pipeline Company, L.L.C. states that copies of the filing
were served on parties on the official service list in the above-
captioned proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-9106 Filed 6-9-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


                  List of CP Cultivars Released Since 1969***
                Major cultivar **   	At least 5 % * of acreage

 	CP 50-28		1969

  	CP 56-59**		1969

  	CP 56-63		1969

  	CP 57-603		1969

  	CP 57-357**		Louisiana

  	CP 57-614		1969

  	CP 59-73		1969

  	CP 62-374 		1969

  	CP 63-306		1969

  	CP 63-588**		1969

  	CP 68-1026		1976

  	CP 68-1067		1972

  	CP 69-1052		1980

   	CP 70-1133**		1978

   	CP 70-1527		1984

  	CP 71-1038	 	1983

  	CP 72-1210**		1981

  	CP 72-2086**		1984

  	CP 73-1547*  		1982

   	CP 74-2005*		1983

   	CP 75-1084		1986

   	CP 75-1553		1986

  	CP 75-1632		1984

   	CP 77-1776		1988

    	CP 78-1247		1988

   	CP 78-1628**		1991

   	CP 78-2114*		1986

   	CP 80-1743**		1993

  	CP 80-1557		1990

  	CP 80-1827**		1990

   	CP 81-1238		1994

  	CP 81-1254		1991

  	CP 81-1302 		1991

  	CP 85-1382		1995

  	CP 81-1384		1993

  	CP 82-1172		1991

  	CP 82-1592		1991

  	CP 84-1198**		1994

  	CP 84-1591		1996

  	CP 85-1308		1995

    	CP 85-1432		1994

   	CP 85-1491		1994

   	CP 86-1633		1995

   	CP 84-1591		1996

 	CP 85-1308		1995

 	CP 85-1382		1995

 	CP 86-1633		1995

 	CP 88-1165		2008

 	CP 88-1508		1997

 	CP 88-1540		2000

 	CP 88-1762**		1997

 	CP 88-1834		2000

 	CP 89-1509		2000

 	CP 89-2143**		2000

 	CP 89-2376		2005

 	CP 89-2377	 	2000

 	CP 92-1213		2001

 	CP 92-1641		2001

  	CP 92-1666		2001
 	CP 94-1100		2004
 	CP 94-1340		2004
 	CP 96-1252		2005
 	CP 96-1602		2005
 	CP 97-1989		2005
 	CP 97-1944		2005
 	CP 98-1029		2006
 	CP 00-1101		2008	(muck and sand)
 	CP 00-1446		2009	(sand)
 	CP 00-2180		2009	(sand)
 	CP 01-1372		2009	(muck and sand)
 	CPCL 97-2730	2009	(sand)
 	CPCL 99-4455	2009	(muck and sand)
 	CPCL 00-4111	2010	(muck)
 	CP 03-1912		2010	(sand)
 .	CPCL 02-1295 	2011 (muck and sand)
  	CPCL 02-0926	2011 (muck and sand)
  	CPCL 95-2287 	2011 (muck)
  	CP 04-1566		2011(sand)
  	CP 04-1844		2011 (sand)
  	CP 04-1935 		2011 (sand)
   	CP 05-1526		2012 (muck and sand)
   	CPCL 02-6848	2012 (muck and sand)
   	CPCL 05-1102	2012 (muck)
   	CPCL 05-1201	2012 (muck)
   	CPCL 05-1791	2012 (sand)


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 72239]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30083]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Exemptions for
Air Taxi and Commuter Air Carrier Operations

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. 14 CFR part 298 requires air carrier operators to obtain a
certificate of public convenience and necessity from the DOT, with the
exception of air taxi and commuter air operators.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by January 23, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy DePaepe at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0633.
    Title: Exemptions for Air Taxi and Commuter Air Carrier Operations.
    Form Numbers: OST Form 4507.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 14 part 298,
Exemptions for Air Taxi and Commuter Air Carrier Operations,
establishes two classifications of air carriers known as air taxi
operators and commuter air carriers, the latter being air taxis that
offer scheduled passenger service. Generally, they are small
businesses, and Part 298 sets a maximum on the size of the aircraft
they may operate. The regulation exempts these small operators from
certain provisions of the Federal statute to permit them to obtain
operating authority by filing a one-page OST Form 4705, Air Taxi
Operator and Commuter Air Carrier Registration, and amendments under
part 298 of the Regulations of the Department of Transportation (DOT).
    Respondents: Approximately 2,040 air taxi operators and commuter
air carriers.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 30 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 1,026 hours.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Kathy
DePaepe, Room 126B, Federal Aviation Administration, AES-200, 6500 S.
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 14, 2011.
Albert R. Spence,
FAA Assistant Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises
Business Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2011-30083 Filed 11-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40305-40306]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17367]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2018-0283]

Information Collection Request to Office of Management and
Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625-0113

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Sixty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting an extension of
its approval for the following collection of information: 1625-0113,
Crewmember Identification Documents; without change. Our ICR describes
the information we seek to collect from the public. Before submitting
this ICR to OIRA, the Coast Guard is inviting comments as described
below.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before October 15,
2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG-2018-0283] to the Coast Guard using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public
participation and request for comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the internet
at http://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available from:
Commandant (CG-612), ATTN: Paperwork Reduction Act Manager, U.S. Coast
Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE, Stop 7710, Washington, DC
20593-7710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Anthony Smith, Office of
Information Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for questions on these documents.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This Notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an application to
OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a Coast Guard
collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains information
describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's likely burden on
the affected public, an explanation of the necessity of the Collection,
and other important information describing the Collection. There is one
ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be
granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the
Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information
subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. In response to
your comments, we may revise this ICR or decide not to seek an
extension of approval for the Collection. We will consider all comments
and material received during the comment period.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. Comments must contain the OMB Control Number of
the ICR and the docket number of this request, [USCG-2018-0283], and
must be received by October 15, 2018.

Submitting Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions. Documents mentioned in this notice, and all public
comments, are in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and
can be viewed by following that website's instructions. Additionally,
if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will
be notified when comments are posted.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).

Information Collection Request

    Title: Crewmember Identification Documents.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0113.
    Summary: This information collection covers the requirements that
crewmembers on vessels calling at U.S. ports must carry and present on
demand, an identification that allows the identity of crewmembers to be
authoritatively validated.
    Need: Title 46 U.S.C. 70111 mandated that the Coast Guard establish
regulation about crewmember identification. The regulations are in 33
CFR part 160 Subpart D.
    Forms: None.
    Respondents: Crewmembers, and operators of certain vessels.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Hour Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has decreased from
34,293 hours to 32,955 hours a year due to a decrease in the estimated
time to acquire an acceptable identification document.

    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended.

    Dated: May 15, 2018.
James D. Roppel,
 Acting Chief, U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Information Management.
[FR Doc. 2018-17367 Filed 8-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P