[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 184 (Monday, September 25, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44522-44525]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20324]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0149; FRL-9968-00-Region 3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; 2011 Base Year Inventory for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard for the Maryland Portion of the
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City Nonattainment Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve the 2011 base year inventory for the Maryland
portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City marginal
nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standard (NAAQS). The State of Maryland submitted the emission
inventory, which included the ozone precursors, nitrogen oxides
(NOX) and volatile organic compounds (VOC), as well as
several other pollutants, through the Maryland Department of the
Environment (MDE) to meet the nonattainment requirements for marginal
ozone nonattainment areas for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA is
approving the 2011 base year emissions inventory for the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan
(SIP) as the inventory for NOX and VOC is in accordance with
the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: This rule is effective on November 24, 2017 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by October 25,
2017. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform
the public that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2017-0149 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara Calcinore,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Ground level ozone is formed when NOX and VOC react in
the presence of sunlight. NOX and VOC are referred to as
ozone precursors and are emitted by many types of pollution sources,
including motor vehicles, power plants, industrial facilities, and area
wide sources, such as consumer products and lawn and garden equipment.
Scientific evidence indicates that adverse public health effects occur
following exposure to ozone. These effects are more pronounced in
children and adults with lung disease. Breathing air containing ozone
can reduce lung function and inflame airways, which can increase
respiratory symptoms and aggravate asthma or other lung diseases. In
response to this scientific evidence, EPA promulgated the first ozone
NAAQS in 1979, the 0.12 part per million (ppm) 1-hour ozone NAAQS. See
44 FR 8202 (February 8, 1979). EPA had previously promulgated a NAAQS
for total photochemical oxidants.
    On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a revised ozone NAAQS of 0.08
ppm, averaged over eight hours. 62 FR 38855. This 8-hour ozone NAAQS
was determined to be more protective of public health than the previous
1979 1-hour ozone NAAQS. In 2008, EPA revised the 8-hour ozone NAAQS
from 0.08 to 0.075 ppm. See 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On October 1, 2015, EPA strengthened the 8-hour ozone NAAQS
to 0.070 ppm. See 80 FR 65292 (October 16, 2015). This rulemaking
addresses the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS and does not address the 2015
8-hour ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 21, 2012, the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City area was
designated as marginal nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
77 FR 30088. The designation of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic
City area as marginal nonattainment was effective July 20, 2012. The
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City nonattainment area is comprised
of Cecil County in Maryland, as well as counties in Delaware, New
Jersey, and Pennsylvania. Under section 172(c)(3) of the CAA, Maryland
is required to submit a comprehensive, accurate, and current inventory
of actual emissions from all sources of the relevant pollutants, i.e.
the ozone precursors NOX and VOC, in its marginal
nonattainment area, i.e., the Maryland portion of the Philadelphia-
Wilmington-Atlantic City nonattainment area.

II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis

    Under CAA section 172(c)(3), states are required to submit a
comprehensive, accurate, and current inventory of actual emissions from
all sources (point, nonpoint, nonroad, and onroad) of the relevant
pollutant or pollutants in the nonattainment area. CAA section
182(a)(1) requires that areas designated as nonattainment and
classified as marginal submit an inventory of all sources of ozone
precursors no later than 2 years after the effective date of
designation. EPA's guidance for emissions inventory development calls
for actual emissions to be used in the base year inventory. The state
must report annual emissions as well as ``summer day emissions.'' As
defined in 40 CFR 51.900(v), ``summer day emissions'' means, ``an
average day's emissions for a typical summer work weekday. The state
will select the particular month(s) in summer and the day(s) in the
work week to be represented.''
    On January 19, 2017, MDE submitted a formal revision (SIP #16-15)
to its SIP. The SIP revision consists of the 2011 base year inventory
for the Maryland portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City
nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. MDE selected 2011
as its base year for SIP planning purposes, as recommended in EPA's
final rule, ``Implementation of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality
Standards for Ozone: State Implementation Plan Requirements.'' See 80
FR 12263 (March 6, 2015). MDE's 2011 base year inventory includes
emissions estimates covering the general source categories of
stationary point, area (nonpoint), nonroad mobile, onroad mobile, and
Marine-Air-Rail (M-A-R).

In its 2011 base year inventory, MDE reported actual annual emissions
and typical summer day emissions for the months of May through
September for NOX, VOC, and carbon monoxide (CO). Although
MDE also reported annual emissions for fine particulate matter
(PM2.5), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and ammonia
(NH3) and typical summer day emissions for CO, in this
approval of the 2011 base year emissions inventory for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS, EPA is approving only relevant ozone precursors, which are VOC
and NOX.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The actual annual emissions and typical summer day emissions
were summarized by MDE in Table 1-1: 2011 Base Year SIP Emission
Inventory Summary. A discrepancy was found between the area annual
emissions reported for PM2.5 and NH3 in Table
1-1 and the area annual emissions reported for PM2.5 and
NH3 in Table 4-1: 2011 Base Year SIP Area Source Emission
Inventories and the Nonpoint Annual data table under Appendix C
Area/Nonpoint Sources. Since the anthropogenic totals in Table 1-1
correspond to the annual emissions values, the anthropogenic totals
for PM2.5 and NH3 in Table 1-1 were also
affected by the discrepancy. In a correction letter, MDE confirmed
that the area annual emissions for PM2.5 and
NH3 in Table 1-1 are 456.50 tpy for PM2.5 and
477.15 tpy for NH3. MDE also confirmed that the
corresponding anthropogenic totals for PM2.5 and
NH3 are 625.04 tpy and 530.10 tpy. MDE has submitted a
corrected version of page 3 of the 2011 base year inventory to
reflect the necessary corrections to Table 1-1. The corrected
version as well as the correction letter are included in the docket
for this rulemaking even though the CAA at sections 172 and 182 only
require an inventory of ozone precursors. See July 20, 2017 letter
from Brian Hug, Program Manager, Maryland Department of the
Environment to Cecil Rodrigues, Acting Regional Administrator, EPA
Region III, Subject: SIP #16-15 ``2011 Base Year Emissions Inventory
for the Maryland Portion of the Philadelphia-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-
DE-MD 2008 Ozone NAAQS Nonattainment Area (Cecil County, MD)'' Minor
Corrections.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Table 1 summarizes the 2011 VOC and NOX emission
inventory by source sector for Maryland's marginal nonattainment area.
Annual emissions are given in tons per year (tpy) and summer weekday
emissions are given by tons per day (tpd).

      Table 1--Summary of 2011 Emissions of Ozone Precursors for the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City
                                               Nonattainment Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Summer weekday  (tpd)               Annual  (tpy)
                  Source sector                  ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        VOC             NOX             VOC             NOX
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point...........................................           0.301            2.63           64.91           76.19
Area............................................           2.863            0.31          937.78          242.02
Nonroad.........................................           5.127            2.01        1,054.93          529.02
Onroad..........................................            2.29            7.50          791.98        2,730.44
M-A-R...........................................           0.030            0.46           11.03          167.97
Anthropogenic Subtotal..........................           10.61           12.90        2,860.63        3,745.63
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Point sources are large, stationary, and identifiable sources of
emissions that release pollutants into the atmosphere. Maryland
obtained its point source data from the MDE Air and Radiation
Management Administration (ARMA) point source emissions inventory. ARMA
identifies and inventories stationary sources for the point source
emissions inventory through inspections, investigations, permitting,
and equipment registrations.
    Area sources, also known as nonpoint sources, are sources of
pollution that are small and numerous and have not been inventoried as
specific point or mobile sources. To inventory these sources, they are
grouped so that emissions can be estimated collectively using one
methodology. Examples include residential heating emissions and
emissions from consumer solvents. MDE calculated nonpoint emissions for
the Maryland portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City
nonattainment area by multiplying emissions factors specific for each
source category with some known indicator of collective activity for
each source category, such as population or employment data.
    Nonroad sources are mobile sources other than onroad vehicles,
including aircraft, locomotives, construction and agricultural
equipment, and marine vessels. Emissions from different source
categories are calculated using various methodologies. MDE relied on
EPA's nonroad emissions calculations from the National Mobile Inventory
Model (NMIM--April 5, 2009). Onroad or highway sources are vehicles,
such as cars, trucks, and buses, which are operated on public roadways.
MDE estimated onroad emissions using EPA's Motor Vehicle Emission
Simulator (MOVES) model, version 2010a, and appropriate activity
levels, such as vehicle miles traveled (VMT) estimates developed from
vehicle count data maintained by the State Highway Administration (SHA)
of the Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT). M-A-R sources
include marine vessels, airports, and railroad locomotives. MDE
estimated M-A-R emissions using data from surveyed sources or state and
federal reporting agencies.
    EPA reviewed Maryland's 2011 base year emission inventory's
results, procedures, and methodologies for the Maryland portion of the
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City nonattainment area and found them
to be acceptable and approvable for sections 110, 172(c)(3) and
182(a)(1) of the CAA. EPA's review and analysis is detailed in a
Technical Support Document (TSD) prepared for this rulemaking. The TSD
is available online at http://www.regulations.gov, Docket ID No. EPA-
R03-OAR-2017-0149.

III. Final Action

    EPA is approving the Maryland January 19, 2017 SIP revision as
meeting requirements for a base year inventory for the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS for the Maryland portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-
Atlantic City nonattainment area because the inventory for ozone
precursors was prepared in accordance with requirements in sections
110, 172(c)(3) and 182(a)(1) of the CAA and its implementing
regulations including 40 CFR 51.915. EPA is publishing this rule
without prior proposal because EPA views this as a noncontroversial
amendment and anticipates no adverse comment. However, in the
``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal Register, EPA is publishing
a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP
revision if adverse comments are filed. This rule will be effective on
November 24, 2017 without further notice unless EPA receives adverse
comment by October 25, 2017. If EPA receives adverse comment, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the
public that the rule will not take effect. EPA will address all public
comments in a subsequent final rule based on the

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this
action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 24, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of this Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking action.
    This action approving Maryland's 2011 base year inventory for the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Maryland portion of the Philadelphia-
Wilmington-Atlantic City nonattainment area may not be challenged later
in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: September 8, 2017.
Cecil Rodrigues,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart V--Maryland

0
2. In Sec.  52.1070, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an
entry for ``2011 Base Year Inventory for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard'' at the end of the table to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.1070  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Name of non-regulatory SIP     Applicable geographic       State                              Additional
            revision                      area           submittal date  EPA approval date       explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
2011 Base Year Inventory for     Maryland portion of         01/19/2017  09/25/2017,        Sec.   52.1075(q).
 the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National   the Philadelphia-                       [Insert Federal
 Ambient Air Quality Standard.    Wilmington-Atlantic                     Register
                                  City, PA-NJ-DE-MD                       citation].
                                  2008 ozone
                                  nonattainment area.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0
3. Section 52.1075 is amended by adding paragraph (q) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.1075  Base year emissions inventory.

* * * * *
    (q) EPA approves, as a revision to the Maryland state
implementation plan the

2011 base year emissions inventory for the Maryland portion of the
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City marginal nonattainment area for
the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards submitted
by the Maryland Department of the Environment on January 19, 2017, as
amended July 20, 2017. The 2011 base year emissions inventory includes
emissions estimates that cover the general source categories of
stationary point, area (nonpoint), nonroad mobile, onroad mobile, and
Marine-Air-Rail (M-A-R). The inventory included actual annual emissions
and typical summer day emissions for the months of May through
September for the ozone precursors, VOC and NOX.

[FR Doc. 2017-20324 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50331-50332]
[FR Doc No: 2022-17590]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP16-22-000]

NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Onsite Environmental
Review

    On August 23-25, 2022, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's
Office of Energy Projects staff will conduct a

restoration inspection of the NEXUS Gas Transmission Project (NEXUS
Project) right-of-way in Columbiana, Stark, Summit, Wayne, Medina,
Lorain, and Erie Counties, Ohio. The purpose of the inspection is to
assess the existing condition of right-of-way restoration along the
eastern end of the NEXUS Project and NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC's
(NEXUS) compliance with the restoration conditions of the Commission's
August 25, 2017 Order Issuing Certificate. NEXUS representatives will
accompany the Office of Energy Projects staff during the inspection and
will view the right-of-way from public access points and where
landowners have granted NEXUS access outside of the permanent right-of-
way easement. Landowners requesting Commission staff inspection of
their properties within the above-mentioned counties must contact
either the Office of External Affairs at (866) 208-FERC or email
[email protected] no later than August 18, 2022 and provide their own
transportation during the inspection.

    Dated: August 10, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-17590 Filed 8-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73366-73367]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26045]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-96382; File No. 4-698]

Joint Industry Plan; Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for
Commission Action on a Proposed Amendment to the National Market System
Plan Governing the Consolidated Audit Trail

November 23, 2022.
    On May 13, 2022, the Operating Committee for Consolidated Audit
Trail, LLC (``CAT LLC''), on behalf of the Participants \1\ to the
National Market System Plan Governing the Consolidated Audit Trail (the
``CAT NMS Plan'' or ``Plan''),\2\ filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to section 11A of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \3\ and Rule 608 of
Regulation National Market System (``NMS'') thereunder,\4\ a proposed
amendment to the CAT NMS Plan (``Proposed Amendment'') to implement a
revised funding model (``Executed Share Model'') for the consolidated
audit trail (``CAT'') and to establish a fee schedule for Participant
CAT fees in accordance with the Executed Share Model.\5\ The Proposed
Amendment was published for comment in the Federal Register on June 1,
2022.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Participants are: BOX Exchange LLC; Cboe BYX Exchange,
Inc., Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc., Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc., Cboe EDGX
Exchange, Inc., Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc., Cboe Exchange, Inc.,
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., The Investors'
Exchange LLC, Long-Term Stock Exchange, Inc., MEMX LLC, Miami
International Securities Exchange LLC, MIAX Emerald, LLC, MIAX
PEARL, LLC, Nasdaq BX, Inc., Nasdaq GEMX, LLC, Nasdaq ISE, LLC,
Nasdaq MRX, LLC, Nasdaq PHLX, Inc., The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, New
York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE American LLC, NYSE Arca, Inc., NYSE
Chicago, Inc., and NYSE National, Inc. (collectively, the
``Participants'').
    \2\ The CAT NMS Plan is a national market system plan approved
by the Commission pursuant to Section 11A of the Exchange Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 79318 (Nov. 15, 2016), 81 FR 84696 (Nov. 23, 2016)
(``CAT NMS Plan Approval Order''). The CAT NMS Plan functions as the
limited liability company agreement of the jointly owned limited
liability company formed under Delaware state law through which the
Participants conduct the activities of the CAT (``Company''). On
August 29, 2019, the Participants replaced the CAT NMS Plan in its
entirety with the limited liability company agreement of a new
limited liability company named Consolidated Audit Trail, LLC (``CAT
LLC''), which became the Company. The latest version of the CAT NMS
Plan is available at https://catnmsplan.com/about-cat/cat-nms-plan.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C 78k-1.
    \4\ 17 CFR 242.608.
    \5\ See Letter from Michael Simon, CAT NMS Plan Operating
Committee Chair, to Vanessa Countryman, Secretary, Commission (May
13, 2022) (``Transmittal Letter'').
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94984 (May 25,
2022), 87 FR 33226 (``Notice''). Comments received in response to
the Notice can be found on the Commission's website at https://www.sec.gov/comments/4-698/4-698-a.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 30, 2022, the Commission instituted proceedings pursuant
to Rule 608(b)(2)(i) of Regulation NMS \7\ to determine whether to
disapprove the Proposed Amendment or to approve the Proposed Amendment
with any changes or subject to any conditions the Commission deems
necessary or appropriate.\8\ On November 16, 2022, CAT LLC submitted a
partial amendment to the Proposed Amendment.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 242.608(b)(2)(i).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95634 (Aug. 30,
2022), 87 FR 54558 (Sept. 6, 2022) (``OIP''). Comments received in
response to the OIP can be found on the Commission's website at
https://www.sec.gov/comments/4-698/4-698-a.htm.
    \9\ See Letter from Michael Simon, CAT NMS Plan Operating
Committee Chair, to Vanessa Countryman, Secretary, Commission (Nov.
15, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 608(b)(2)(i) of Regulation NMS provides that proceedings to
determine whether a plan or amendment should be disapproved shall be
concluded within 180 days of the date of publication of notice of the
plan or amendment and that the time for conclusion of such proceedings
may be extended for up to 60 days (up to 240 days from the date of
notice publication) if the Commission determines that a longer period
is appropriate and publishes the reasons for such determination or the
plan participants consent to a longer period.\10\ The 180th day after
publication of the Notice for the Proposed Amendment is November 28,
2022. The Commission is extending this 180-day period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 242.608(b)(2)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer
period within which to conclude proceedings regarding the Proposed
Amendment so that it has sufficient time to consider the Proposed
Amendment and the comments received. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule
608(b)(2)(i) of Regulation NMS,\11\ the Commission designates January
27, 2023 as the date by which the Commission shall conclude the
proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the

Proposed Amendment or to approve the Proposed Amendment with any
changes or subject to any conditions the Commission deems necessary or
appropriate (File No. 4-698).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(85).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-26045 Filed 11-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 214 (Monday, November 5, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66415-66417]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26897]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-1157; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-061-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited Model
airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model BAe 146 and Avro 146-RJ series
airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report that certain
ceramic terminal blocks, through which the wiring for the engine fire
extinguishers, fire detection circuits, and engine and intake anti-ice
system are routed, have been found to have moisture ingress which can
degrade the insulation resistance of the ceramic terminal blocks. This
proposed AD would require a one-time insulation resistance test of
ceramic terminal blocks, and if necessary, replacement of the blocks.
We are proposing this AD to prevent latent failure of the number 2 fire
bottle, which, in the event of an engine fire, could result in failure
of the fire bottle to discharge when activated and possibly preventing
the flightcrew from extinguishing an engine fire.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 20,
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited, Customer Information Department,
Prestwick International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United
Kingdom; telephone +44 1292 675207; fax +44 1292 675704; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/RegionalAircraft/index.htm. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-1157;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-061-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2012-0040, dated March 13, 2012 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    Moisture ingress has been discovered on certain ceramic terminal
blocks, mounted on the engine cowlings, through which the wiring for
the engine fire extinguishers, fire detection circuits and engine
and intake anti ice system are routed. The affected terminal blocks
were introduced through BAE Systems SB 71-077-01693A (modification
HCM01693A) during the period 2002-2004, as this modification was
mandated by CAA UK AD 005-10-2001 [which corresponds with FAA AD
2003-03-10, Amendment 39-13034 (68 FR 4902, January 31, 2003)].
Moisture ingress has a detrimental effect on the insulation
resistance of the ceramic terminal block with the resultant
possibility of interconnections between all terminals. Most of the
possible failure conditions in the terminal block should result in
an evident warning or other indication. However, the functional loss
of the number 2 fire bottle would be a dormant failure.
    This condition, if not corrected, could result in the failure of
a fire bottle to discharge when activated, possibly preventing the
flight crew in extinguishing an engine fire.
    For the reasons described above, this AD requires a one-time
inspection of the ceramic terminal blocks to determine the
insulation resistance and, depending on findings, replacement of
terminal blocks, and the reporting of the results to the BAE
Systems. These will be used to establish a suitable repetitive
inspection interval, which is expected to be introduced through the
Maintenance Review Board (MRB) process.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    BAE Systems (Operations) Limited has issued Inspection Service
Bulletin 24-143, Revision 1, dated October 2, 2012. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Reporting Requirement

    Although the MCAI or service information tells you to submit
information to BAE Systems (Operations) Limited, paragraph (i) of this
AD specifies that such submittal is not required.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 2 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 10 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $1,700, or $850 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 1 work-hour and require parts costing $949, for a cost of
$1,034 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

BAE Systems (Operations) Limited: Docket No. FAA-2012-1157;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-061-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by December 20, 2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model
BAe 146-100A, -200A, and -300A airplanes; and Model Avro 146-RJ70A,
146-RJ85A, and 146-RJ100A airplanes; certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24: Electrical
Power.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report that certain ceramic terminal
blocks, through which the wiring for the engine fire extinguishers,
fire detection circuits, and engine and intake anti-ice system are
routed, have been found to have moisture ingress

which can degrade the insulation resistance of the ceramic terminal
blocks. We are issuing this AD to prevent latent failure of the
number 2 fire bottle, which, in the event of an engine fire, could
result in failure of the fire bottle to discharge when activated and
possibly preventing the flightcrew from extinguishing an engine
fire.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Inspection

    Within 4,000 flight cycles or 18 months, whichever occurs first
after the effective date of this AD, do an insulation resistance
test on each terminal block, in accordance with paragraphs 2.C.,
2.D., 2.E., and 2.F. of the Accomplishment Instructions of BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection Service Bulletin 24-143,
Revision 1, dated October 2, 2012.

(h) Replacement

    If, during the test required by paragraph (g) of this AD, any
terminal block is found to have a value of less than 50 megohms,
before next flight, replace it with a new or serviceable terminal
block, in accordance with paragraph 2.G. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection Service
Bulletin 24-143, Revision 1, dated October 2, 2012.

(i) Inspection Report Difference

    Where BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection Service
Bulletin 24-143, Revision 1, dated October 2, 2012, specifies to
complete the test result sheets in Appendices 1, 2, 3, and 4 and the
inspection report in Appendix 6, and send the information to BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited, this AD does not require that action.

(j) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited Inspection Service Bulletin 24-143, dated September 26,
2011, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.

(k) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Todd
Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(l) Related Information

    (1) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2012-0040, dated March 13, 2012; and Bae
Systems (Operations) Limited Inspection Service Bulletin 24-143,
Revision 1, dated October 2, 2012; for related information.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited, Customer Information Department,
Prestwick International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United
Kingdom; telephone +44 1292 675207; fax +44 1292 675704; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/RegionalAircraft/index.htm. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 26, 2012.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-26897 Filed 11-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


 MEMORANDUM

DATE:09/03/2014 FROM: 		Laura Farris/EPA Region 8 TO:CLEAN Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR - 2013-0602 SUBJECT:	Colorado Climate Action Coalition Event held on 09/03/2014

SUMMARY:

EPA Region 8 participated in an event held by Environment Colorado on behalf of the Colorado Climate Action Coalition to deliver over 189,000 public comments to the EPA, and Senator Bennet and Udall's offices, to demonstrate the support in Colorado for the EPA's Clean Power Plan.   ATTENDEES:

EPA Region 8 Carl Daly, Laura Farris, Rich Mylott

External Stakeholders Kim Stevens, Campaign Director, Environment Colorado Brandon Rattiner, Regional Director, Office of Senator Mark Udall Sabastian Dawiskiba, Grants Manger and Constituent Advocate for Housing, Office of Senator Bennet Citizen activists

Attachments Photos of Supports America Acts on Climate Materials May 22, 2014, letter to President Obama from public officials supporting climate action


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 35 (Thursday, February 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12049-12050]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03957]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 7887-017]

Marlborough Hydro Associates; Ashuelot River Hydro, Inc.; Notice
of Application for Transfer of License, and Soliciting Comments and
Motions To Intervene

    On January 9, 2013, Marlborough Hydro Associates (transferor) and
Ashuelot River Hydro, Inc. (transferee) filed an application for
transfer of license for the Minnewawa Hydroelectric Project, FERC No.
7887, located on Minnewawa Brook in Cheshire County, New Hampshire.
    Applicants seek Commission approval to transfer the license for the
Minnewawa Hydroelectric Project from the transferor to the transferee.
    Applicants' Contact: For transferor: Mr. John Webster, General
Partner, Marlborough Hydro Associates, P.O. Box 178, South Berwick, ME
03908 and Ms. Elizabeth W. Whittle, Nixon, Peabody, LLP, 401 Ninth
Street NW., Suite 900, Washington, DC 20004, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
For transferee: Mr. Robert King, President, Ashuelot River Hydro, Inc.,
42 Hurricane Road, Keene, NH 03431, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Deadline for filing comments and motions to intervene: 15 days from
the issuance date of this notice, by the Commission. Comments and
motions to intervene may be filed electronically via the Internet. See
18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. If unable to be filed electronically,
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original plus seven
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. More
information about this project can be viewed or printed on the eLibrary
link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-7887) in the docket number
field to access the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-
3372.

    Dated: February 14, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-03957 Filed 2-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 23, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 206)]
[Notices]
[Page 63221-63222]
[DOCID:fr23oc08-112]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-58805; File No. SR-BSE-2008-44]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Its Minor Rule Plan

October 17, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 10, 2008, the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. (``BSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the BSE. The Exchange has
designated the proposed rule change as a ``non-controversial'' rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon filing
with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Boston Stock Exchange (the ``Exchange'') proposes to update the
Boston Options Exchange Group LLC (``BOX'') rules to increase and
strengthen sanctions imposed pursuant to the Minor Rule Violation Plan
in connection with any Options Participant or non-Options Participant
customer in accordance with BOX Rules Chapter III, Section 7. The text
of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at
http://nasdaq trader.com/Trader.aspx?id=Boston--Stock--Exchange, at the
Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to update the BOX rules
to clarify and strengthen sanctions imposed for violations of BOX Rules
Chapter III, Section 7 pursuant to the Minor Rule Violation Plan, as
found in BOX Rules, Chapter X. The amendment will impose a flat fine
amount for a violation, rather than a fine levied per contract. In
addition, the proposed amendment will eliminate the current distinction
between Customer accounts and Options Participant accounts. The
Exchange believes these changes will serve as an effective deterrent to
violative conduct.
    The Exchange and certain other self-regulatory organizations
(``SRO's''), as members of the Intermarket Surveillance Group (the
``ISG''), executed and filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on October 29, 2007, a final version of the Agreement
pursuant to Section 17(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as
amended) (the ``Agreement'').\5\ The members of the ISG intend to enter
into an amendment to the 17d-2 Agreement in the near future concerning
the surveillance and sanction of Position Limit violations. In
anticipation, the SRO's have agreed that their respective rules
concerning position limits concerning options contracts are common
rules and should be consistent with one another. The Exchange's
proposed amendment to its Minor Rule violation Plan will result in
further consistency of sanctions among the signatories to the 17d-2
Agreement and the forthcoming amendment concerning Position Limit
violations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56941 (April 11,
2008), 73 FR 75 (April 17, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will
promote consistency in minor rule violations and respective SRO
reporting obligations set forth pursuant to Rule 19d-1(c)(2) under the
Act \8\, which governs minor rule plans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited, nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder \10\ because
the foregoing proposed rule change: (1) Does not significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (2) does not impose
any significant burden on competition; and (3) by its terms, does not
become operative for 30 days after the date of filing, or such shorter
time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) requires the self-regulatory organization to give the
Commission notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. BSE has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative
delay and designate the proposed rule change as operative upon filing.
The Commission hereby grants the Exchange's request and believes that
doing so is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest.\12\ The Exchange's proposed

rule change is based on a similar proposal that was previously approved
by the Commission\13\ and does not raise any novel or significant
issues. Therefore, the Commission designates the proposed rule change
operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ For purposes only of waiving the operative delay for this
proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact
on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
    \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58119 (July 8,
2008), 73 FR 40646 (July 15, 2008) (SR-CBOE-2008-53). See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58289 (August 1, 2008), 73 FR
46667 (August 11, 2008) (SR-ISE-2008-62).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BSE-2008-44 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BSE-2008-44. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BSE-2008-44 and should be
submitted on or before November 13, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-25239 Filed 10-22-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 99 (Monday, May 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 31245]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10941]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2022-N-0619]

Advisory Committee; Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee;
Renewal; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice
entitled ``Advisory Committee; Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory
Committee; Renewal'' that appeared in the Federal Register of May 11,
2022. The document announced the renewal of the Gastrointestinal Drugs
Advisory Committee. The document was published with the incorrect
docket number. This document corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rhea Bhatt, Division of Advisory
Committee and Consultant Management, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
31, Rm. 2434, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of Wednesday, May
11, 2022 (87 FR 28834), in FR Doc. 2022-10040, on page 28834, the
following correction is made:
    1. On page 28834, in the first column of the header of the
document, ``Docket No. FDA-2021-N-0619'' is corrected to read ``Docket
No. FDA-2022-N-0619''.

    Dated: May 13, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-10941 Filed 5-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 93 (Wednesday, May 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27599-27600]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11099]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]

Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public Notice

    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of
the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission
decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt off-
the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested
proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of
the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any
oral communication.
    Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional
file associated with, but not a part of, the decisional record of the
proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited
communication and any responses thereto should become a part of the
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication, and may
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant
such a request only when it determines that fairness so requires. Any
person identified below as having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable proceeding in accordance with
Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
    Exempt off-the-record communications are included in the decisional
record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
    The following is a list of off-the-record communications recently
received by the Secretary of the Commission. The communications listed
are grouped by docket numbers in ascending order. These filings are
available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or
may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using
the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number, excluding the last three
digits, in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC, Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Docket No.               Filed date                        Presenter or requester
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prohibited:
    1. ER13-1380-000............         4-30-14  Luci Jessi Young.\1\
    2. CP13-113-000.............          5-6-14  Mark Ambroziak.
Exempt:
    1. CP13-483-000, CP13-492-           4-21-14  FERC Staff.\2\
     000.
    2. P-405-106, P-2355-018....         4-22-14  FERC Staff.\3\
    3. P-2210-000...............         4-23-14  Virginia Delegate Charles D. Poindexter.
    4. CP14-119-000, CP14-120-           4-23-14  Railroad Commission of Texas.\4\
     000, CP14-122-000, PF12-8-
     000.

    5. CP13-499-000, CP13-502-           4-23-14  Hon. Chis Gibson.
     000.
    6. CP14-120-000, CP14-119-           4-23-14  State of Texas Rep. Jim Keffer.
     000, CP14-122-000, PF12-8-
     000.
    7. P-405-106................         4-23-14  FERC Staff.\5\
    8. CP14-96-000..............         4-23-14  State of Maine Representatives and Senators.\6\
    9. CP14-96-000..............         4-23-14  Members of Congress.\7\
    10. P-2232-000..............         4-23-14  Members of Congress.\8\
    11. ER13-1380-000, ER14-500-         4-24-14  Hon. Terry Gipson.
     000.
    12. CP14-101, PF13-17-000...         4-24-14  Members of Congress.\9\
    13. CP14-119-000, CP14-120-          4-24-14  Members of Congress.\10\
     000, CP14-122-000, PF12-8-
     000.
    14. ER13-1380-000, ER14-500-         4-24-14  Hon. Chris Gibson.
     000.
    15. CP13-113-000............         4-25-14  Hon. May L. Landrieu.
    16. CP14-125-000............         4-29-14  Members of Congress.\11\
    17. ER13-1380-000, ER14-500-         4-30-14  Hon. Sean Patrick Maloney.\12\
     000.
    18. ER13-1380-000...........         4-30-14  City of Kingston, NY.\13\
    19. CP13-483-000, CP13-492-           5-1-14  FERC Staff.\14\
     000.
    20. ER14-1050-000...........          5-5-14  Members of Congress.\15\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ One of eighteen (18) comments submitted on April 30, 2014 involving creation of a new capacity zone within
  New York Independent Systems Operator's footprint.
\2\ Notes from April 17, 2014 bi-weekly telephone conference with federal cooperating agencies.
\3\ Telephone memo dated March 25, 2014.
\4\ Individual letters from Commissioner Christi Craddick and Chairman Barry T. Smitherman.
\5\ Telephone memo (calls dated April 9, 2014, April 11, 2014, April 15, 2014, and April 21, 2014).
\6\ Individual letters from Jeff McCabe, Barry J. Hobbins, Seth Berry, Anne Haskell, Troy Jackson, Michael D.
  Thibodeau.
\7\ Hons. Angus S. King, Jr., Kelly Ayotte, Chris Murphy, Susan Collins, Richard Blumenthal, Jeanne Shaheen,
  Jack Reed, Sheldon Whitehouse.
\8\ Hons. Lindsey Gragam, Tim Scott, James E. Clyburn, Joe Wilson, Jeff Duncan, Trey Gowdy, Mick Mulvaney, Tom
  Rice.
\9\ Hon. Rand Paul and Ed Whitfield.
\10\ Individual letters from Senator Mary L. Landrieu and Representative Pete Olson.
\11\ Hons. David Vitter and Bill Cassidy.
\12\ Records of April 30 telephone call and meeting with Acting Chairman LaFleur.
\13\ One of seventeen (17) comments submitted on April 30, 2014 and May 1, 2014 involving creation of a new
  capacity zone within New York Independent (continued . . .) Systems Operator's footprint. Including,
  individual comments from New York State Assembly Members Didi Barrett and Kieran Michale Lalor, New York State
  Senator Terry Gipson, and the New York State Public Service Commission.
\14\ Notes from April 30, 2014 bi-weekly telephone conference with federal cooperating agencies.
\15\ Hons. Jeanne Shaheen, Patrick Leahy, Edward J. Markey, Kelly Ayotte, Richard Blumenthal, Christopher
  Murphy, Sheldon Whitehouse, Jack Reed, Elizabeth Warren.

    Dated: May 8, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-11099 Filed 5-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 169 (Thursday, August 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 52741]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21415]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0135]

Compliance Policy Guide Sec. 420.300 Changes in Compendial
Specifications and New Drug Application Supplements; Withdrawal of
Guidance

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
withdrawal of Compliance Policy Guide (CPG) Sec. 420.300 Changes in
Compendial Specifications and New Drug Application (NDA) Supplements.
CPG Sec. 420.300 is included in FDA's Compliance Policy Guides Manual
available on the Agency's Web site at http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/ComplianceManuals/CompliancePolicyGuidanceManual/default.htm.

DATES: The withdrawal is effective August 30, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Larry A. Ouderkirk, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This CPG was originally issued on October 1,
1980, in the Agency's Manual of Compliance Policy Guides. FDA is
withdrawing CPG Sec. 420.300 because it is obsolete. Current guidance
to FDA staff and industry regarding application requirement for changes
in compendial specifications is provided in 21 CFR 314.70 and the
Agency's Guidance for Industry: Changes to an Approved NDA or
Abbreviated New Drug Application, which is available on the Internet at
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM077097.pdf.

    Dated: August 16, 2012.
Dara A. Corrigan,
Associate Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2012-21415 Filed 8-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register: September 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 178)]
[Notices]
[Page 56098-56099]
[DOCID:fr15se10-68]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0533; FRL-8844-3

Amitraz; Receipt of Application for Emergency Exemption,
Solicitation of Public Comment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has received a specific exemption request from the South
Dakota Department of Agriculture to use the pesticide amitraz (CAS No.
330089-61-1) to treat up to 250,000 colonies of beehives to control
varroa mites. The applicant proposes a use of a pesticide which was
voluntarily canceled under section 6(f) of the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), and which poses a risk similar
to the risk which was voluntarily canceled under section 6(f) of FIFRA.
EPA is soliciting public comment before making the decision whether or
not to grant the exemption.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 30, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0533, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2010-0533. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of
operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stacey Groce, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to

certain entities. If you have any questions regarding the applicability
of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1.  Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2.  Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
    3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the
pesticide(s) discussed in this document, compared to the general
population.

II. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    Under section 18 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136p), at the discretion of the
Administrator, a Federal or State agency may be exempted from any
provision of FIFRA if the Administrator determines that emergency
conditions exist which require the exemption. The South Dakota
Department of Agriculture has requested the Administrator to issue a
specific exemption for the use of amitraz in beehives to control varroa
mites. Information in accordance with 40 CFR part 166 was submitted as
part of this request.
    As part of this request, the applicant asserts that the beekeeping
industry in South Dakota is threatened by varroa mite, a devastating
pest found in bees. According to the applicant, varroa mites are
developing resistance to pesticides currently available to control this
pest. South Dakota is a top ranking honey producing state and the
beekeeping industry is important to South Dakota's economy. Varroa mite
outbreaks are also associated with colony virus problems.
    The Applicant proposes to make no more than two treatments (plastic
strips impregnated with amitraz) per year in beehives in all counties
throughout South Dakota. Approximately 250,000 honeybee colonies could
be treated in South Dakota, requiring 500,000 strips for a single
varroa mite treatment. The total amount of pesticide that could be used
is 250,000 grams active ingredient. The proposed treatment schedule
would allow for the plastic strips to be hung in the beehives during
the spring or fall if varroa mite infestations have reached treatment
threshold.
    This notice does not constitute a decision by EPA on the
application itself. The regulations governing section 18 of FIFRA
require publication of a notice of receipt of an application for a
specific exemption proposing:
    A use of a pesticide which was voluntarily canceled under section
6(f) of FIFRA, and which poses a risk similar to the risk which was
voluntarily canceled under section 6(f) of FIFRA. The notice provides
an opportunity for public comment on the application.
    The Agency will review and consider all comments received during
the comment period in determining whether to issue the specific
exemption requested by the South Dakota Department of Agriculture.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: September 7, 2010.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010-22998 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


Exhibits from April 14 and 16, 2010, ACCSH meeting (Docket No.
OSHA-2010-0014)

Ex. 2 -- PowerPoint on NIOSH Construction program presented by Dr.
Christine Branche.

Ex. 3 – PowerPoint on Data Overview on Stimulus Funded Work presented
by Keith Goddard, director, OSHA Directorate of Evaluation and Analysis.

Ex. 4 – Approved Powered Fasting Tools (Nailguns) Work Group report
from 4-12-2010 meeting.

Ex. 4.1 – Video on Nail Rook Deck – Two Actuation Systems.

Ex. 4.2	 -- California OSHA standard on Pneumatically-Driven Nailers and
Staplers.

Ex. 4.3 – PowerPoint on Adoption and Diffusion of Safety Improved
Nailguns – NIOSH project update by Jim Albers.

Ex. 5 – Approved Residential Fall Protection Work Group report from
4-12-2010 meeting.

Ex. 6 – Approved OTI – Training Work Group reports from 4-13-2010
meeting.

Ex. 7 – Approved Green Jobs Work Group reports from 4-13-2010 meeting.

Ex. 7.1 – PowerPoint on Green Jobs presented by Dean McKenzie, Office
of Construction Services, OSHA Directorate of Construction.

Ex. 8 – Approved Silica and other Construction Health Hazards Work
Group report from 4-12-2010 meeting.

Ex. 8.1 – ACCSH Report on Occupational Health Standard for
Construction Industry submitted to OSHA on 5-15-1980.

Ex. 9 – Approved Prevention by Design Work Group report from the
4-13-2010 meeting.

Ex. 9.1 – PowerPoint on Hazard Mitigation Through Design presented by
Jeremy Beithancourt, LeBlanc Building Co., Inc.

Ex. 10 – Approved Diversity – Women in Construction Work Group
report from 4-13-2010 meeting.

Ex. 10.1 – List of PPE manufacturers that provide PPE sized to fit
women construction workers.

Ex. 10.2 – PowerPoint on “Women in Construction” presented by Fran
Schreiber of Kazan, McClain, Lyons, Greenwoel & Harley.

Ex. 10.3 – California OSHA standards on toilet and handwashing
facilities at construction jobsites.

Ex. 10.4 --  North Carolina Quick Card on Women in Construction.

Ex. 10.5 – Draft fact sheet and quick card on Women in Construction.

Ex. 10.6 – Diversity – Women in Construction Work Group
recommendations to ACCSH regarding 29 CFR 1926.51.

Ex. 11 – Approved Multilingual Issues in Construction Work Group
report from 4-13-2010 meeting.

Ex. 11.1 – Draft Immigrant Worker Safety and Health Report from NIOSH
Conference on Research Needs.

Ex. 11.2 – List of Latino Summit workshops that ACCSH members signed
up to attend.

Ex. 12 – Agenda of April 14 and 16, 2010, ACCSH meeting.


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 53 (Monday, March 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15230-15231]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05856]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2021-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2113]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS
report, once effective, will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before June 21, 2021.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the
respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2113, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
exception occurred on : 2021-05856.htm
exception occurred on : 2021-05856.htm
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email) patri[email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and are used to calculate the appropriate
flood insurance premium rates for new buildings built after the FIRM
and FIS report become effective.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location
https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities
with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be
identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date
listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Coconino County, Arizona and Incorporated Areas
          Project: 12-09-1963S Preliminary Date: July 10, 2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unincorporated Areas of Coconino County  Coconino County Community
                                          Development Department, 2500
                                          North Fort Valley Road,
                                          Building 1, Flagstaff, AZ
                                          86001.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2021-05856 Filed 3-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register: October 17, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 199)]
[Notices]
[Page 60331-60332]
[DOCID:fr17oc05-82]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Application for Surrender of License With Dam Removal
and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

October 11, 2005.
    a. Type of Application: Application for Surrender of License and
Dam Removal.
    b. Project Number: P-11433-016.
    c. Date Filed: October 3, 2005.
    d. Applicant: Madison Electric Works.
    e. Name of Project: Sandy River Project (FERC No. 11433).
    f. Location: The project is located on the Sandy River, near the
town of Starks/Norridgewock, in Somerset County, Maine.

    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r)
and 799 and 801.
    h. Applicant Contact: Calvin Ames, Superintendent, 6 Business Park
Drive, Madison, Maine 04950. Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Any questions on this notice should be addressed
to Robert Fletcher at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    j. Deadline for filing comments and or motions: November 10, 2005.
    k. Description of Request: Madison Electric Works proposes to
surrender its project license for the Sandy River Project. As part of
the application, MEW requests Commission approval to remove the entire
dam structure from the intake to the western shore in order to allow
fish passage at the project. The powerhouse and western abutment will
remain intact.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the

``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field (P-11433) to access the document. You
may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp
 to be notified via e-mail of new filings and

issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
call 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call
(202) 502-8659. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item (h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene--Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents--Any filings must
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS'', ``PROTEST'', OR ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as
applicable, and the Project Number of the particular application to
which the filing refers (p-11433-016). All documents (original and
eight copies) should be filed with: Magalie R. Salas, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. A copy of any motion to intervene must also be
served upon each representative of the Applicant specified in the
particular application.
    p. Agency Comments--Federal, State, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.
    q. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov

under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-5699 Filed 10-14-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63058-63059]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22588]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP23-16-000.
    Applicants: LA Storage, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Filing of Negotiated Rate,
Conforming IW Agreement 10.7.22 to be effective 10/7/2022.
    Filed Date: 10/7/22.
    Accession Number: 20221007-5077.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 10/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP23-17-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Filing--Macquarie Energy LLC to be effective 11/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 10/12/22.
    Accession Number: 20221012-5000.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 10/24/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP23-18-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Filing--Mercuria Energy America, LLC to be effective 11/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 10/12/22.
    Accession Number: 20221012-5001.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 10/24/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP23-19-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Filing--Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. to be effective 11/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 10/12/22.
    Accession Number: 20221012-5002.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 10/24/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests,

service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information,
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 12, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-22588 Filed 10-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P