[Federal Register: July 27, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 143)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 43892-43897]
[DOCID:fr27jy10-30]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R02-OAR-2010-0321, FRL-9180-5]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New York
Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality and
Nonattainment New Source Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the New York State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submitted by the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation on March 3, 2009. The proposed revisions would create a
new New York State Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air
Quality (PSD) regulations program and modify the existing New York
State Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) regulations in the SIP.
These proposed revisions also address changes mandated by the revised
Federal New Source Review (NSR) regulations, referred to as the ``2002
NSR Reform Rules.'' EPA's 2002 NSR Reform Rules, proposed by New York
State for inclusion in the New York SIP with some changes, include
provisions for baseline emissions calculations, an actual-to-projected-
actual methodology for calculating emissions changes, options for
plantwide applicability limits, and recordkeeping and reporting
requirements. If EPA finalizes approval of New York's regulations, New
York will implement its own PSD and NNSR State regulations. EPA notes
that, in this proposal, no action is being taken on certain items of
New York's revisions that relate to the Prevention of Significant
Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule (``Tailoring
Rule'').

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 26, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-
R02-OAR-2010-0321, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Raymond Werner, Chief, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866.
     Hand Delivery: Raymond Werner, Chief, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation. The Regional
Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R02-OAR-
2010-0321. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, Air Programs Branch, 290 Broadway,
25th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866. EPA requests, if at all
possible, that you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4
p.m., excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Jon, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,
New York 10007-1866,<PHONE_NUMBER>; e[dash]mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, references to
``EPA,'' ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our,'' are intended to mean the
Environmental Protection Agency. The supplementary information is
arranged as follows:

    I. What is being addressed in this document?
    II. What is the background for this action?
    III. What is EPA's analysis of New York's NSR rule revisions?
    IV. What action is EPA proposing to take?
    V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What is being addressed in this document?

    On March 3, 2009, the State of New York, through the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), submitted to EPA
Region 2 revisions to the New York

State Implementation Plan (SIP). The submittal consists of revisions to
three regulations that are already part of the New York SIP. The
affected regulations are: 6 New York Code of Rules and Regulations
(NYCRR) Part 231, New Source Review for New and Modified Facilities; 6
NYCRR Part 200, General Provisions; and 6 NYCRR Part 201, Permits and
Certificates. The revisions were made to create a new New York State
PSD regulation program and to update the existing New York State
nonattainment regulations consistent with changes to the Federal NSR
regulations published on December 31, 2002 (67 FR 80186). In today's
action, EPA is proposing to approve those revisions with the caveat
that EPA is not proposing action at this time on (1) the PSD permitting
threshold provisions to the extent that those provisions require
permits for sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that equal or
exceed the 100/250 tons per year (tpy) GHG levels but are less than the
thresholds identified in EPA's final Tailoring Rule at 75 FR 31514,
31606 (June 3, 2010); and (2) the PSD significance level provisions of
New York's rule to the extent that those provisions treat as
significant GHG emissions increases that are less than the thresholds
identified in the final Tailoring Rule. Id. In accordance with the
final Tailoring Rule, New York is expected to submit a letter to EPA
addressing these issues shortly. Id. After receiving New York's letter,
EPA will take action with respect to these additional items. Today's
proposed approval with respect to GHG emissions above the Tailoring
Rule thresholds is premised on our understanding that the New York
State PSD regulations provide authority to regulate GHG emissions
within EPA's meaning of the term ``subject to regulation.'' See 75 FR
31582. This understanding is based upon EPA's review of New York's
definition of ``Regulated NSR Contaminant,'' which includes any
contaminant that is ``subject to regulation'' under the Clean Air Act.
6 NYCRR Sec.  231-4.1(43). New York is also expected to address its
authority to regulate GHG emissions in its letter. In the event that
New York articulates the view that it does not have authority to
regulate greenhouse gases, EPA will revisit this issue before taking
final action.

II. What is the background for this action?

    On December 31, 2002, EPA published final rule changes to 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 51 and 52, regarding the Clean Air
Act's PSD and Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) programs. 67 FR
80186. Available at http://www.epa.gov/nsr/fr/20021231_80186.pdf. On
November 7, 2003, EPA published a final action on the reconsideration
of the December 31, 2002 final rule changes. 68 FR 63021. In that
November 7th final action, EPA added the definition of ``replacement
unit,'' and clarified an issue regarding plantwide applicability
limitations (PALs). On June 13, 2007, EPA revised the rules to remove
provisions for pollution control projects and clean units. 72 FR 32526.
EPA further revised the rules on December 21, 2007, to clarify when
facilities must keep records and report emissions when a ``reasonable
possibility'' test shows that projected emissions increases could equal
or exceed 50% of the Clean Air Act's NSR significant levels for a
regulated NSR pollutant. 72 FR 72607. Collectively, these four final
actions are referred to as the ``2002 NSR Reform Rules.'' The 2002 NSR
Reform Rules are part of EPA's implementation of parts C and D of title
I of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7470-7515. Part C of title I of
the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7470-7492, is the PSD program, which applies in
areas that meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)--
``attainment'' areas--as well as in areas for which there is
insufficient information to determine whether the area meets the
NAAQS--``unclassifiable'' areas. Part D of title I of the CAA, 42
U.S.C. 7501-7515, is the NNSR program, which applies in areas that are
not in attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS)--``nonattainment areas.'' Collectively, the PSD and NNSR
programs are referred to as the ``New Source Review'' or ``NSR
programs''. EPA regulations implementing these programs are contained
in 40 CFR 51.165, 51.166, 52.21, 52.24, and part 51, Appendix S. The
CAA's NSR programs are preconstruction permitting programs applicable
to new and modified stationary sources of air pollutants regulated
under the CAA.
    The NSR programs include a combination of air quality planning and
air pollution control technology requirements. Briefly, section 109 of
the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7409, requires EPA to promulgate primary NAAQS to
protect public health and secondary NAAQS to protect public welfare.
Once EPA sets those standards, States must develop, adopt, and submit
to EPA for approval, a SIP that contains emissions limitations and
other control measures to attain and maintain the NAAQS. Each SIP is
required to contain a preconstruction review program for the
construction and modification of any stationary source of air pollution
to: (1) Assure that the NAAQS are achieved and maintained; (2) protect
areas of clean air; (3) protect air quality related values (such as
visibility) in national parks and other areas; (4) assure that
appropriate emissions controls are applied; (5) maximize opportunities
for economic development consistent with the preservation of clean air
resources; and (6) ensure that any decision to increase air pollution
is made only after full public consideration of the consequences of the
decision.
    The 2002 NSR Reform Rules made changes to four areas of the NSR
programs. In summary, the 2002 Rules: (1) Provide a new method for
determining baseline actual emissions; (2) adopt an actual-to-
projected-actual methodology for determining whether a major
modification has occurred; (3) allow major stationary sources to comply
with plant-wide applicability limits (PALs) to avoid having a
significant emissions increase that triggers the requirements of the
major NSR program; and (4) require new recordkeeping and reporting. On
November 7, 2003, EPA published a final action on its reconsideration
of the 2002 NSR Reform Rules (68 FR 63021), which added a definition
for ``replacement unit'' and clarified an issue regarding PALs. After
the 2002 NSR Reform Rules were finalized and effective (March 3, 2003),
various petitioners challenged numerous aspects of the 2002 NSR Reform
Rules, along with portions of EPA's 1980 NSR Rules (45 FR 5276, August
7, 1980). On June 24, 2005, the DC Circuit Court issued a decision on
the challenges to the 2002 NSR Reform Rules. New York v. United States,
413 F.3d 3 (DC Cir. 2005). In summary, the DC Circuit Court vacated
portions of the Rules pertaining to clean units and pollution control
projects, remanded a portion of the Rules regarding recordkeeping,
e.g., 40 CFR 52.21(r)(6) and 40 CFR 51.166(r)(6), and either upheld or
did not comment on the other provisions included as part of the 2002
NSR Reform Rules. On June 13, 2007, EPA revised the Rules to remove
provisions for pollution control projects and clean units. On December
21, 2007, EPA took final action regarding the remanded portion on
recordkeeping by promulgating the reasonable possibility in
recordkeeping rule. Today's action is consistent with the decision of
the DC Circuit Court because New York's submittal does not include any
portions of the 2002 NSR Reform Rules that were vacated as part

of the DC Circuit Court's June 2005 decision.
    The 2002 NSR Reform Rules require that State agencies adopt and
submit revisions to their SIP permitting programs implementing the
minimum program elements of the 2002 NSR Reform Rules no later than
January 2, 2006. (Consistent with changes to 40 CFR 51.166(a)(6)(i),
State agencies are now required to adopt and submit SIP revisions
within three years after new amendments are published in the Federal
Register.) State agencies may meet the requirements of 40 CFR part 51,
and the 2002 NSR Reform Rules, with different but equivalent
regulations. However, if a State decides not to implement any of the
new applicability provisions, that State is required to demonstrate
that its existing program is at least as stringent as the Federal
program. On March 3, 2009, the State of New York submitted a SIP
revision for the purpose of revising the State's NSR permitting
provisions. These changes were made primarily to adopt EPA's 2002 NSR
Reform Rules with a few modifications. As discussed in further detail
below, EPA believes the revisions contained in the New York submittal
are approvable for inclusion into the New York SIP, with the caveat
that we are taking no action on the specific items identified in
Section I of this proposal related to the Tailoring Rule thresholds.

III. What is EPA's analysis of New York's NSR rule revisions?

    New York currently has an approved NNSR program for new and
modified sources. Today, EPA is proposing to approve revisions to New
York's existing NNSR program and a new PSD program. These proposed
revisions became State effective on March 5, 2009, and were submitted
to EPA on March 3, 2009. Copies of the revised rules, as well as the
State's Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS), can be obtained from the
Docket, as discussed in the ``Docket'' section above. In general, the
New York State revisions to the rule are similar to the Federal NSR
Reform Rules except for a few specific provisions. A discussion of the
specific changes to New York's rule, proposed for inclusion in the SIP,
that are different from the EPA rules are as follows.

A. Definition for Baseline Period

    Under the major NSR program, an existing major facility may modify,
or even completely replace, or add, emissions units without obtaining a
major NSR permit, so long as the ``projected actual emissions'' do not
increase by a significant amount over the levels emitted during the
``baseline period'' at the plant as a whole.
    The revised New York regulations in 6 NYCRR Part 231 establish a
uniform period provision for electric utility steam generating units
(EUSGUs) and non-EUSGUs. The revised Part 231 requires that all
emissions sources select a baseline period using the annual average of
any twenty-four (24) consecutive month period within the five (5) year
period that precedes a proposed change. Sources are not allowed to go
beyond this time period.
    Under the Federal NSR rule, EUSGUs must select a baseline period
using any 24-consecutive month period within the 5-year period
immediately preceding the actual construction or another 24-consecutive
month period that is demonstrated to be more representative. For non-
EUSGUs, they must take the average of annual emissions of any 24-
consecutive months within the 10-year period that precedes the proposed
change. By allowing a longer period for selecting the 24-month average,
sources are more likely to find a period of time with high emissions
that will result in an increase below significance levels. Though EPA
believes that the Federal rule allowing a 10-year look-back for
defining the baseline period for non-EUSGUs retains the environmental
benefits of the NSR program,\1\ the revised Part 231 definition of
Baseline Period is more restrictive than the Federal definition for
non-EUSGUs because the Federal definition allows only a 5-year look-
back period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ EPA's environmental impact analysis of the 10-year look-back
provision was provided at the time of the 2002 NSR Reform rule in
EPA's ``Supplemental Analysis of the Environmental Impact of the
2002 Final NSR Improvement Rules'' and is available at http://
www.epa.gov/nsr/actions.html#2002.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Single Baseline for Facilities Undergoing NSR Modifications

    The revised Part 231 requires that facilities select a single
baseline period for all regulated NSR pollutants when calculating
baseline actual emissions.
    Under the Federal NSR rule, facilities are allowed to choose a
different baseline period within the look-back period for each NSR
pollutant. This allows sources to pick and choose the baseline period,
for each pollutant, most likely to result in an increase below
significance levels. New York's approach would not allow for this
flexibility, and would increase the likelihood of requiring NSR review
for more regulated NSR pollutants. So, this State requirement is more
stringent than the Federal requirement.

C. Plantwide Applicability Limits (PALs)

    A PAL is a voluntary option that provides a facility with the
ability to manage facility-wide emissions without triggering major NSR
review. If a facility keeps the emissions below a plantwide actual
emissions cap (that is, an actual PAL), then these regulations allow
the facility to avoid the major NSR permitting process when the
facility makes alterations to the plant or individual emissions units.
In return for this flexibility, the facility must monitor and comply
with more stringent requirements for all of the emissions units under
the PAL.
    The revised Part 231 allows facilities to establish a PAL for an
initial term not to exceed 10 years. However, the rule aligns the PAL
term with the facility's title V permit so that they both expire at the
same time. This will allow the PAL to be renewed with the title V
facility under the same administrative and permit review process and
will result in PAL renewals earlier than under the Federal rule.
    The revised Part 231 also requires a reduction in the PAL of up to
25% or implementation of best available control technology (BACT),
whichever is less stringent, by the end of the fifth year of the
initial PAL. The earlier PAL renewals and PAL reduction programs under
New York's revised Part 231 are more stringent than the Federal rules.

D. The Facility Need Not Be Major for the Specific Nonattainment
Pollutant in Order for the Specific Nonattainment Significant Threshold
To Apply

    New York's revised Part 231 does not require that the facility be
an existing major source for the applicable nonattainment pollutant
before looking at the specific nonattainment significant threshold for
applicability purposes. In other words, a facility only needs to be a
major source for one nonattainment pollutant, for example, ozone, for
all other nonattainment significant thresholds to apply for
applicability purposes. The revised Part 231 for nonattainment areas
follows the same applicability procedures as the PSD rules, i.e., the
facility only needs to be an existing major stationary source for an
attainment pollutant and then all the significant thresholds will apply
for applicability purposes. This is more stringent than the Federal
requirements in nonattainment areas which indicate that the existing
facility must be a major stationary source for that specific
nonattainment pollutant before the applicable significant nonattainment
pollutant threshold is applied.

E. Reasonable Possibility in Recordkeeping

    Revised Part 231 expands upon the requirements of EPA's December
21, 2007 final Reasonable Possibility in Recordkeeping rule by
incorporating recordkeeping and/or monitoring requirements for all
insignificant modifications. For example, any modification with a
``project emission potential'' (a term equivalent to EPA's projected
actual emissions increase) which is less than 50% of the applicable
significant project threshold, or any modification with a project
emission potential which, when emissions from independent and unrelated
factors such as demand growth are added, is less than 50% of the
applicable significant project threshold, must maintain for a minimum
of 5 years: (1) A description of the modification; (2) An
identification of each new or modified emission sources(s) including
the associated processes, and emission units; (3) the calculation of
the projected emission potential for each modified emission source(s)
including supporting documentation; and (4) the date the modification
commenced operation.
    The revised Part 231 also extends the pre-construction notification
requirement (must submit an application to the NYSDEC) to any facility
that proposes a modification with a project emission potential which
equals or exceeds 50% of the applicable significant project threshold
or proposes a modification with a project emission potential which is
less than 50% of the applicable significant project threshold, but
equals or exceeds 50% of the applicable significant project threshold
when emissions from independent and unrelated factors such as demand
growth are added.
    For the post-change monitoring requirements, the facilities must
keep records of their calculations of emission increases from
independent and unrelated factors such as demand growth, monitor post-
modification emissions, and submit annual reports to verify the
accuracy of their calculations.
    Under the Federal NSR rule, provisions for recordkeeping are
applicable to: (1) Modifications with a projected actual emissions
increase that equals or exceeds 50% of the applicable NSR significant
threshold, and (2) modifications with a projected actual emissions
increase that is less than 50% of the applicable NSR significance
threshold but when emissions attributable to independent and unrelated
factors such as demand growth are added, equals or exceeds 50% of the
applicable NSR significance threshold. For (1) above, EPA requires
emission sources to comply with both pre-change and post-change
recordkeeping and reporting requirements. For (2) above, EPA requires
only pre-change recordkeeping requirements.
    Also, the final Federal Reasonable Possibility Rule only requires
EUSGUs to notify the permitting authority, prior to beginning actual
construction, for any modification with a project emission potential
which equals or exceeds 50% of the applicable significant project
threshold. Therefore, the revised Part 231 is more restrictive than the
Federal requirements.
    Except as described above, the State Part 231 rules are
substantively the same as the existing PSD and nonattainment Federal
rules.

F. Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality: 6 NYCRR Part
231

    The State rule does not incorporate the portions of the Federal
rules that were vacated by the DC Circuit Court, specifically, the
clean unit provisions and the pollution control projects exclusion.
Except for the items described above in Sections A through E, the
revisions included in New York's PSD program are substantively the same
and, in some instances (as discussed above), more stringent than the
corresponding Federal provisions.
    As part of its review of the New York SIP submittal, EPA performed
a review of the proposed revisions and has determined that they are
consistent with the program requirements for the preparation, adoption
and submittal of implementation plans for the Prevention of Significant
Deterioration of Air Quality, set forth at 40 CFR 51.166, including the
2002 NSR Reform Rules.

G. Review of New Sources in Nonattainment Areas: 6 NYCRR Part 231

    New York's permitting requirements for major sources in
nonattainment areas are set forth at 6 NYCRR Part 231. The New York
nonattainment NSR program was originally approved into the New York SIP
on July 1, 1980 and applies to the construction and modification of any
major stationary source of air pollution in a nonattainment area, as
required by part D of title I of the CAA. To receive approval to
construct, a source that is subject to this regulation must show that
it will not cause a net increase in pollution with more than 1:1 offset
ratio, will not create a delay in meeting the NAAQS, and will install
and use control technology that achieves the LAER. The revisions to
this regulation, which EPA is proposing to approve into the SIP, update
the existing provisions to be consistent with the current Federal
nonattainment rule in 40 CFR 51.165, including the 2002 NSR Reform
Rules. These revisions address baseline actual emissions, actual-to-
projected-actual applicability tests, and PALs.
    The State rule does not incorporate the portions of the Federal
rules that were vacated by the DC Circuit Court, specifically, the
clean unit provisions and the pollution control projects exclusion.
Except for the items described above in Sections A through E, the
revisions included in New York's nonattainment NSR program are
substantively the same as the 2002 NSR Reform Rules. As part of its
review of the New York submittal, EPA performed a review of the
proposed revisions and has determined that they are consistent with the
program requirements for the preparation, adoption and submittal of
implementation plans for New Source Review, set forth at 40 CFR 51.165,
including the 2002 NSR Reform Rules.
    We note that New York State is required to submit a SIP revision to
EPA as a result of the Implementation of the New Source Review (NSR)
Program for Particulate Matter Less than 2.5 Micrometers
(PM2.5) which was published in the Federal Register on May
16, 2008. 73 FR 28321. This rule requires the States to adopt and
submit plan revisions to their attainment and nonattainment NSR SIP
that incorporate a number of requirements pertaining to
PM2.5 within 3 years from the date EPA publishes the changes
in the Federal Register. Consequently, New York State has until May 16,
2011 to submit the required PM2.5 changes to EPA.

H. Technical Error and Other Issues

    There is a technical error in the revised Part 231. New York must
address this technical error by adding the underlined words ``equal
or'' as shown below. However, EPA is proposing to approve this
regulation into the SIP with the interpretation listed below for this
particular definition. Our interpretation, that the language should
read as ``equal or exceed,'' is consistent with other sections of Part
231 which do use the term ``equal or exceed'' when dealing with
applicable significant project threshold of a regulated NSR contaminant
and manifest New York's intention to apply the language in the Federal
rules.
    From ``Definitions'' under 6 NYCRR Part 231-4.1(b)(31):

    (31) NSR major modification. Any modification of a major
facility that would

equal or exceed the applicable significant project threshold of a
regulated NSR contaminant in Table 3, Table 4, or Table 6 of Subpart
231-13 of this Part; and would result in a significant net emissions
increase of that contaminant from the major facility.
    (i) Any modification with a project emission potential for VOC
or NOX that equals or exceeds the applicable significant
project threshold or any net emissions increase at a major facility
that is significant for VOC or NOX shall be considered
significant for ozone.

    With respect to the creation of Emission Reduction Credits (ERCs),
the revised 6 NYCRR Part 231 states that for NOX,
PM10 or VOC emissions, ERCs must have physically occurred on
or after November 15, 1990 but need not be contemporaneous. This
November 15, 1990 date is much earlier than the emission inventory base
year that New York State uses for planning purposes which is the year
2002. EPA regulations require a State to include ERCs created in the
years prior to the emission inventory base year in the future year
attainment inventories. ERCs created between November 15, 1990 and 2002
have been properly accounted for in the future year (projection)
attainment inventories that are used to account for the reasonable
further progress requirements. Therefore, EPA deems that the ERC meets
the specific requirements from shutdowns and curtailments contained in
40 CFR part 51, Appendix S, section IV.C.3.
    With respect to the creation of ERCs for PM2.5, 6 NYCRR
Part 231 states that the ERCs must have physically occurred on or after
April 5, 2005 but need not be contemporaneous. The year for the last
New York State PM2.5 emission inventory is 2002. The April
5, 2005 date is more stringent than the Federal requirement of using
the emission inventory base year of 2002. Therefore, EPA is proposing
to approve the provision with the April 5, 2005 date.

I. Revisions to 6 NYCRR Part 200, ``General Provisions'' and 6 NYCRR
Part 201, ``Permits and Certificates''

    New York also made administrative changes to Parts 200 and 201
which reflect implementation of the Part 231 provisions. The Part 200
amendments, specifically Subdivision 200.1(bl) was amended to clarify
that for emergency power generating stationary internal combustion
engines, the potential to emit will be based on a maximum of 500 hours
of operation per year per engine unless a more restrictive limitation
exists in a permit or registration. A new subdivision 200.1(cl) was
added to indicate that routine maintenance determinations are made on a
case-by-case basis, taking into account the nature and extent of the
activity and its frequency and cost. Section 200.9 was amended to
include all Federal materials referenced in the proposed amendments to
Part 231. Section 200.10(a) was amended to reflect that the NYSDEC is
no longer delegated responsibility for implementation of the Federal
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Program.
    New York's amendments to Part 201 revise the definition for ``major
stationary source or major source or major facility'' at 6 NYCRR 201-
2.1(b)(21). The definition will now encompass the term ``major
facility'' and incorporate major facility and significant project
thresholds for facilities emitting particulate matter or particles with
an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 2.5 micro-
meters (PM2.5). EPA designated the New York City
metropolitan area as nonattainment for the PM2.5 standard
(70 FR 944). NNSR review is now required for new major facilities and
major modifications to existing facilities that emit PM2.5
in significant amounts in the PM2.5 nonattainment area.
    Since the revisions to Parts 200 and 201, including the new or
revised definitions are consistent with Federal guidance, EPA is
proposing to approve them into the New York SIP. It is important to
note that EPA is proposing to approve only those revisions made to Part
200, specifically subparts 200.1, 200.6, 200.7, and 200.9, as effective
March 5, 2009, consistent with what has been previously approved into
the Federally enforceable New York SIP. EPA is also proposing to
approve those revisions to Part 201, specifically subpart 201-2,
effective March 5, 2009, as it applies to the implementation of the
Part 231 NSR permitting program. EPA is not proposing action on the
revisions to section 200.10 since they are references to Federal
standards and requirements and are therefore already Federally
enforceable standards and requirements.

J. Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 110(l)

    Section 110(l) of the CAA provides that ``the Administrator shall
not approve a revision of a plan if the revision would interfere with
any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further
progress * * * or any other applicable requirement of this Act.''
    Approval of New York's Revised Part 231 into the SIP would not
violate CAA section 110(l) with respect to either PSD or nonattainment
NSR.
1. PSD
    With respect to PSD, EPA determines that approval of New York's
regulations will not ``interfere with * * * attainment or any other
applicable requirement'' of the statute. New York has never had a PSD
SIP. As a result, the regulations currently in place in New York State
are the Federal NSR Reform regulations. New York's proposed SIP for PSD
is no less stringent than the Federal program, and is in fact more
stringent than the Federal program in a number of ways as discussed
above in this proposal. Thus, approval of New York's PSD regulations
into the SIP will not interfere with any applicable requirement of the
CAA.
2. Nonattainment NSR (NNSR)
    EPA likewise determines that approval of New York's proposed NNSR
SIP also would not interfere with attainment, reasonable further
progress or any other applicable requirement of the CAA. New York's
NNSR SIP approval dates back to July 1, 1980, well before the 1990
Clean Air Act Amendments. Since then, there have been many improvements
in part D of the CAA, and these have been incorporated into New York's
revised Part 231. Thus, approval of New York's new NNSR regulation into
the SIP will add provisions that will support attainment or reasonable
further progress. For example, the current NNSR SIP does not contain
up-to-date offset ratios for VOCs and NOX inasmuch as it
predates the ozone transport region, and contains a threshold of 50
tons/year throughout the State for VOCs and NOX. New York's
revised Part 231 addresses these weaknesses. Furthermore, New York's
reasonable further progress (RFP) demonstration does not rely on this
NSR rule but on other regulations, such as Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT).

K. Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 193

    Section 193 of the CAA specifically provides that ``no control
requirement in effect, or required to be adopted by an order,
settlement agreement, or plan in effect before November 15, 1990, in
any area which is a nonattainment area for any air pollutant may be
modified after November 15, 1990, in any manner unless the modification
insures equivalent or greater emissions reductions of such air
pollutant.''
    As discussed in the preceding section, New York's PSD and NNSR SIP
provisions are more stringent than the applicable Federal regulations
and the existing NSR SIP approved on July 1,

1980. Because the proposed SIP revision will result in equivalent or
greater emission reductions, the proposed SIP revision is consistent
with the requirements of section 193 of the CAA.

IV. What action is EPA proposing to take?

    EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the New York SIP 6 NYCRR
Part 200, 6 NYCRR Part 201 and 6 NYCRR Part 231 which became effective
under NYS law on March 5, 2009, and was submitted by the State of New
York to EPA on March 3, 2009. Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve
subparts 200.1, 200.6, 200.7, and 220.9, as effective March 5, 2009,
and subpart 201-2, as effective March 5, 2009, with the caveat that EPA
is taking no action on the specific items identified in Section I of
this proposal related to the Tailoring Rule thresholds. EPA will take
action on these additional items after receiving New York's letter,
expected shortly.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: July 16, 2010.
Judith A. Enck,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2010-18365 Filed 7-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


reporting activities from 1,564,000 hours in the previous ICR to
approximately 1,950,000 hours.  This reflects an increase in the
respondent universe because of the number of new units that came on-line
in the last four years.

The estimated number of sources applying to opt-in to the Acid Rain
Program was reduced from 1 to 0.  This results in the estimated burden
dropping from 388 hours in 2003 to 0 in the current collection.

The burden for NOX permitting increased from 1,060 hours to 1,270 hours.
This burden change reflects an increase in the number of NOX compliance
plan revisions submitted each year, from 6 to 27.

	While most of the change in burden is due to adjustments, there is a
smaller burden reduction due to program changes.

The burden for reporting annual compliance certification information
decreased from 8,575 hours to 0 due to the elimination of the annual
compliance certification reports and the change from unit level to
facility or plant level compliance.

6.10 	Burden Statement

	The respondent reporting burden for this collection of information is
estimated to be 1,971,276 hours each year for the years 2007 through
2009.  The burden to EPA is estimated to be 31,974 hours in 2003 each
year for the years 2007 through 2009.	The annual public reporting and
recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to
average 110 hours per response.  Burden means the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency.  This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to
a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review
the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.  The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

	To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of
the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques,
EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number
EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0509, which is available for online viewing at
www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Air and Radiation
docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C.  The EPA Docket Center Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays.  The telephone number for the Reading Room is
(202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation
docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.  An electronic version of the public docket is
available at www.regulations.gov.  This site can be used to submit or
view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the
public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that
are available electronically.  When in the system, select “search,”
then key in the Docket ID Number identified above.  Also, you can send
comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20503,
Attention: Desk Officer for EPA.  Please include the EPA Docket ID
Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0509 and OMB Control Number 2060-0258 any
correspondence.

EXHIBIT 16

AGGREGATE ANNUAL RESPONDENT BURDEN AND COST OF COLLECTIONS (2007-2009)

Program	Total Burden (Hours)	Total Costsa

Allowance transfers and deductions	5,885	$407,669.30

Energy conservation

and renewable energy allowances	0	$0

Permits	13,531	$1,011,726.00

Emissions reporting	1,950,143	$260,831,647

Auctions	166.5	$13,176.81

Opt-inb	280	$17,969.80

NOx permitting	1,270	$87,800.05

TOTAL	  =SUM(ABOVE)  1,971,275.5 	  =SUM(ABOVE)  $262,369,988.96

a	2006 dollars.

b	Includes permitting and annual reconciliation burdens for opt-in
sources.

EXHIBIT 17

AGGREGATE ANNUAL AGENCY BURDEN AND COST OF COLLECTIONS

Program	Total Burden (Hours)	Total Costsa

Allowance transfers and deductions	550	$30,058.00

Energy conservation and renewable energy

   allowances	0	$0

Permits

     Permitting Authority

     EPA

2,212

680

$120,885

$37,156

Emissions reporting

Auctions

Opt-in

NOx permitting

Operation & Maintenance of data systemsb	28,296

85

24

127

NA	$1,546,376

$4,645.25

$1,311.60

$6,941.55

$1,500,000

TOTAL	  =SUM(ABOVE)  31,974 	  =SUM(ABOVE)  $3,247,373.40

a	2006 dollars.

b	Average annual operation and maintenance costs associated with running
electronic data systems are assumed to be incurred by an EPA contractor.
 Therefore, EPA will not incur any labor burden for these activities.

Appendix A: Acid Rain Program Forms and Instructions

  PAGE   1

  PAGE   45

  PAGE   48

  PAGE   57

  PAGE   58

  PAGE   60

  PAGE

  PAGE   62