[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 174 (Wednesday, September 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 54294]
[FR Doc No: 2015-22593]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-0001]

Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and
recommendations to the Agency on FDA's regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on December 1, 2015, from 8
a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: FDA White Oak Campus, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31
Conference Center, the Great Room (rm. 1503), Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002. Answers to commonly asked questions including information
regarding special accommodations due to a disability, visitor parking,
and transportation may be accessed at: http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm408555.htm.
    Contact Person: Kalyani Bhatt, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
31, rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, FAX: 301-847-
8533, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or FDA Advisory Committee Information
Line, 1-800-741-8138<PHONE_NUMBER> in the Washington, DC area). A
notice in the Federal Register about last minute modifications that
impact a previously announced advisory committee meeting cannot always
be published quickly enough to provide timely notice. Therefore, you
should always check the Agency's Web site at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm and scroll down to the appropriate
advisory committee meeting link, or call the advisory committee
information line to learn about possible modifications before coming to
the meeting.
    Agenda: The committee will discuss the efficacy and safety data for
new drug application (NDA) 21164, gepirone hydrochloride extended-
release tablets, submitted by Fabre-Kramer Pharmaceuticals, Inc., for
the proposed indication of major depressive disorder.
    FDA intends to make background material available to the public no
later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post
the background material on its Web site prior to the meeting, the
background material will be made publicly available at the location of
the advisory committee meeting, and the background material will be
posted on FDA's Web site after the meeting. Background material is
available at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/Calendar/default.htm. Scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee meeting
link.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee.
Written submissions may be made to the contact person on or before
November 23, 2015. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled
between approximately 1 p.m. and 2 p.m. Those individuals interested in
making formal oral presentations should notify the contact person and
submit a brief statement of the general nature of the evidence or
arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses of proposed
participants, and an indication of the approximate time requested to
make their presentation on or before November 13, 2015. Time allotted
for each presentation may be limited. If the number of registrants
requesting to speak is greater than can be reasonably accommodated
during the scheduled open public hearing session, FDA may conduct a
lottery to determine the speakers for the scheduled open public hearing
session. The contact person will notify interested persons regarding
their request to speak by November 16, 2015.
    Persons attending FDA's advisory committee meetings are advised
that the Agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical
outlets.
    FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with
disabilities. If you require accommodations due to a disability, please
contact Kalyani Bhatt at least 7 days in advance of the meeting.
    FDA is committed to the orderly conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our Web site at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm111462.htm for procedures
on public conduct during advisory committee meetings.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: September 2, 2015.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-22593 Filed 9-8-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 81424-81427]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31962]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-1250; Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-075-AD;
Amendment 39-16548; AD 2010-26-09]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
(Sikorsky) Model S76A, B, and C Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing emergency airworthiness
directive (EAD) for the specified Sikorsky model helicopters. The EAD
requires inspecting the LITEF Attitude Heading and Reference System
(AHRS) unit of the navigation system to determine if it is at a Mod
Status ``18.'' If either AHRS unit is at Mod Status ``18,'' the EAD
requires installing placards on the instrument panel to prohibit single
pilot instrument flight rule (IFR) and single pilot night flight and
reducing airspeeds to 120 knots indicated airspeed (KIAS) if both
autopilots uncouple during instrument meteorological conditions (IMC)
or night flight. The EAD also requires inserting minimum crew and
airspeed limitations into the Limitations section of the applicable
Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM) to limit the minimum

flight crew to 2 pilots for night flight and IFR flight and to reduce
airspeed to 120 KIAS if both autopilots uncouple during IMC or night
flight. This amendment contains the same requirements but draws the
appropriate distinctions between IFR and IMC as used in the intended
operating limitations. Also, unlike the EAD, this AD states the
airspeed must be reduced to 120 KIAS if both autopilots uncouple during
IMC or night flight. Further, we are removing the limitation contained
in the Active Temporary Revisions relating to pilots keeping their
hands and feet near the flight controls. This AD was prompted by the
need to supersede the EAD to state the distinction between IFR and IMC
as used in the operating limitations and to reduce the airspeed to 120
KIAS if both autopilots uncouple during IMC or night flight. The
actions specified by this AD are intended to implement operating
limitations based on an anomaly in the AHRS related to the 26 volt AC
inverter that could result in a decoupling of both autopilots and to
prevent loss of control of the helicopter during IMC and during night
flight.

DATES: Effective January 12, 2011.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of January 12, 2011.
    We must receive comments on this AD by February 28, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this AD.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    You may get the service information identified in this AD from
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, Attn: Manager, Commercial Technical
Support, mailstop s581a, 6900 Main Street, Stratford, CT, telephone
(203) 383-4866, e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or at http://www.sikorsky.com.
    Examining the Docket: You may examine the docket that contains the
AD, any comments, and other information on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov, or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
located in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the West Building at the
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tony Pigott, Aviation Safety Engineer,
Boston Aircraft Certification Office, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 19, 2010, we issued EAD No. 2010-11-
52, to require inspecting the AHRS unit to determine if it is at a Mod
Status ``18.'' If the nameplate indicates that either AHRS unit is a
Mod Status ``18,'' the EAD requires installing placards on the
instrument panel to prohibit single pilot IFR and single pilot night
flight and reducing airspeeds to 120 KIAS if both autopilots uncouple
during IMC or night flight. The EAD also requires inserting the Active
Temporary Revision listed in Table 1 into the Limitations section of
the RFM to limit the minimum flight crew to 2 pilots for IFR and night
flight. That action was prompted by reports of intermittent
malfunctions of the LITEF AHRS units of the navigation system. The EAD
states that the condition, if not corrected, could result in
malfunction of the autopilots, inability to reset the autopilots, an
uncommanded roll, reduction in rotorcraft functional capabilities,
inability of the crew to perform the required tasks, and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
    Since issuing EAD 2010-11-52, we have discovered that we did not
draw the appropriate distinctions between IFR and IMC as used in the
intended operating limitations, and we did not state the requirement to
reduce the airspeed to 120 KIAS if both autopilots uncouple during IMC
or night flight. Further, we did not intend to adopt as a limitation
the provision contained in the Active Temporary Revisions relating to
pilots keeping their hands and feet near the flight controls as this is
considered normal conduct of a helicopter pilot exercising good care
and sound judgment regardless of the AHRS unit installed.
    We have reviewed Sikorsky Alert Service Bulletin No. 76-34-11,
dated May 17, 2010 (ASB). The ASB specifies informing operators of an
interim minimum flight crew restriction of two pilots for IFR and night
flight for helicopters equipped with LITEF LCR-100, Mod Status ``18,''
AHRS units. The ASB also specifies removing and inspecting the AHRS
units to determine if part number (P/N)<PHONE_NUMBER>, Mod Status ``18,''
is installed, and if it is installed, identifying the unit with a
placard with a different P/N. Finally, the ASB specifies installing 2
placards, P/N SS9140-1746, or locally fabricated placards, one on each
side of the instrument panel.
    Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other Sikorsky model helicopters of these same type
designs, this AD supersedes EAD 2010-11-52 by retaining the current
requirements but by clarifying the appropriate distinctions between IFR
and IMC as used in the intended operating limitations. Also, in this AD
we state the requirement to reduce the airspeed to 120 KIAS if both
autopilots uncouple during IMC or night flight. Further, we have
removed the Active Temporary Revisions to correct the provision
relating to pilots keeping their hands and feet near the flight
controls. In the place of the Active Temporary Revisions, we are now
requiring you to insert a copy of this AD into the Limitations section
of the applicable RFM to address the airspeed limitations and the
minimum flight crew. Accomplish the actions in this AD by following
specified portions of the ASB described previously. This AD does not
require installing placards containing the Sikorsky P/N 76070-60019-101
on the AHRS unit as specified in the Sikorsky ASB. Also, this AD
revises the unsafe condition statement by stating that the actions are
intended to implement operating limitations based on an anomaly in the
AHRS related to the 26 volt AC inverter that could result in a
decoupling of both autopilots and to prevent loss of control of the
helicopter during IMC and night flight.
    The short compliance time involved is required because the
previously described critical unsafe condition can adversely affect the
controllability of the helicopter. Therefore, determining if the AHRS
unit is an affected unit, installing certain placards on the instrument
panel, and inserting limitations into the Limitations section of the
applicable RFM are required within 5 days, and this AD must be issued
immediately.
    Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior
public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.

    We estimate that this AD will affect 1 helicopter in the U.S.
registry. We estimate it will take about 1 work hour to inspect the
AHRS unit to determine if it is a Mod Status ``18,'' 1 work hour to
fabricate and install a placard, and \1/2\ work hour to revise the RFM.
The average labor rate is $85 per hour and there are only minimal parts
costs. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of this AD on U.S.
operators is $213.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and an opportunity for
public comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views,
or arguments regarding this AD. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-1250;
Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-075-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend the AD in light
of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive concerning this AD. Using the search function of the docket Web
site, you can find and read the comments to any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual who sent the comment. You may
review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD. See the AD docket to examine the economic evaluation.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding a new AD to read as follows:

2010-26-09 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation: Amendment 39-16548; Docket
No. FAA-2010-1250; Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-075-AD. Supersedes
EAD 2010-11-52; Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-059-AD.
    Applicability: Model S-76A, B, and C helicopters, with LITEF
LCR-100, Attitude Heading and Reference System (AHRS) Unit, part
number (P/N)<PHONE_NUMBER>, installed, certificated in any category.
    Compliance: Within 5 days, unless accomplished previously, and
any time thereafter when installing a LITEF LCR-100, AHRS Unit, P/N
145130-7100.
    To implement operating limitations based on an anomaly in the
AHRS related to the 26-volt AC inverter that could result in a
decoupling of both autopilots and to prevent loss of the helicopter
during instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) and while
operating under instrument flight rules (IFR) and night flight, do
the following:
    (a) By referencing the nameplate of the No. 1 and No. 2 AHRS
unit, determine whether the modification (Mod) status is at ``18.''
If the Mod status is ``18'' for either AHRS unit:
    (1) Install instrument panel placards as shown in Figure 2 in
the areas depicted in Figure 3 of Sikorsky Alert Service Bulletin
No. 76-34-11, dated May 17, 2010 (ASB), and by following the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 3.A.(6)(c) through (d) of the
ASB.
    (2) Revise the ``Minimum Flight Crew'' section of the Operating
Limitations section of the Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM) as
follows: ``For helicopters with an LCR-100 Mod Status `18' AHRS
installed, two pilots are required for IFR and night flights.''
    (3) Revise the ``Airspeed Limits'' section of the Operating
Limitations section of the RFM as follows: ``For helicopters with an
LCR-100 Mod Status `18' AHRS installed, airspeed is limited to 120
knots indicated airspeed (KIAS) when both autopilots are uncoupled
and operating at night or in IMC.''
    (4) When present, remove and discard the following Active
Temporary Revisions from the Operating Limitations section of the
RFM for each affected helicopter:

                                 Table 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Active temporary
              Model                RFM document No.        rev. No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
S-76A...........................  SA-4047-76-1......  T-Revision 3.
S-76B...........................  SA 4047-76B-1.....  T-Revision 3.
S-76C (TurboMeca Arriel 1S1       SA 4047-76C-1.....  T-Revision 3.
 engines installed).
S-76C (TurboMeca Arriel 2S1       SA 4047-76C-10....  T-Revision 4.
 engines installed).
S-76C (TurboMeca Arriel 2S1       SA 4047-76C-14....  T-Revision 4.
 engines installed and s/n
 760511 and subsequent).
S-76C (TurboMeca Arriel 2S2       SA 4047-76C-15....  T-Revision 1.
 engines installed).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (5) Revise the Operating Limitations section of the RFM by
inserting a copy of this AD into the appropriate section of the RFM.
    (b) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Contact the Manager, Boston Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
Attn: Tony Pigott, Aviation Safety Engineer, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax
(781) 238-7170.
    (c) The Joint Aircraft System/Component (JASC) Code is 3420:
Navigation.
    (d) Installing the placards shall be done by following the
specified portions of Sikorsky Alert Service Bulletin No. 76-34-11,
dated May 17, 2010. The Director of the Federal Register approved
this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Sikorsky Aircraft
Corporation, Attn: Manager, Commercial Technical Support, mailstop
s581a, 6900 Main Street, Stratford, CT, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-
mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or at http://www.sikorsky.com.
Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas,
or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-
741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    (e) This amendment becomes effective on January 12, 2011.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on December 13, 2010.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-31962 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33620-33621]
[FR Doc No: 2023-11029]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2023-0249]

National Navigation Safety Advisory Committee; June 2023 Virtual
Meeting

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice of federal advisory committee virtual meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Navigation Safety Advisory Committee (Committee)
will meet virtually to review and discuss matters relating to maritime
collisions, rammings, and groundings; Inland Rules of the Road;
International Rules of the Road; navigation regulations and equipment;
routing measures; marine information; and aids to navigation systems.
The virtual meeting will be open to the public.

DATES:
    Meeting: The Committee will meet virtually on Friday, June 23,
2023, from 1 p.m. until 2:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT). The
virtual meeting may close early if all business is finished.
    Comments and supporting documentation: To ensure your comments are
received by Committee members before the virtual meeting, submit your
written comments no later than June 9, 2023.

ADDRESSES: To join the virtual meeting or to request special
accommodations, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section no later than 1 p.m. EDT on June 9, 2023,
to obtain the needed information. The number of virtual lines are
limited and will be available on a first-come, first-served basis.
    Pre-registration information: Pre-registration is required for
attending the virtual meeting. You must request attendance by
contacting the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this notice. You will receive a response with attendance
instructions.
    The National Navigation Safety Advisory Committee is committed to
ensuring all participants have equal access regardless of disability
status. If you require reasonable accommodations due to a disability to
fully participate, please email Mr. George Detweiler at
[email protected] or call<PHONE_NUMBER> as soon as possible.
    Instructions: You are free to submit comments at any time,
including orally at the meeting as time permits, but if you want
Committee members to review your comment before the meeting, please
submit your comments no later than June 9, 2023. We are particularly
interested in comments on the topics in the ``Agenda'' section below.
We encourage you to submit comments through Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted
using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the individual in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions. You must include the docket number [USCG-2023-0249].
Comments received will be posted without alteration at https://www.regulations.gov including any personal information provided. You
may wish to view the Privacy and Security Notice and the User Notice,
which are both available on the homepage of https://www.regulations.gov
and DHS's eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11,
2020). If you encounter technical difficulties with comment submission,
contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this notice.
    Docket Search: Documents mentioned in this notice as being
available in the docket, and all public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov, and can be viewed by following
that website's instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online
docket and sign-up for email alerts, you will be notified when comments
are posted.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. George Detweiler, Alternate
Designated Federal Officer of the National Maritime Security Advisory
Committee, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20593,
Stop 7581, Washington, DC 20593-7581; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email
at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is in compliance with
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, (Pub. L. 117-286, 5 U.S.C., ch.
10). The Committee was established on December 4, 2018, by Section 601
of the Frank LoBiondo Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2018, Public Law
115-282, 132 Stat. 4190, and is codified in 46 U.S.C. 15107. The
Committee

operates under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and
46 U.S.C. 15109. The National Navigation Safety Advisory Committee
provides advice, consults with, and makes recommendations to the
Secretary of Homeland Security, via the Commandant of the Coast Guard,
on matters relating to maritime collisions, rammings, and groundings;
Inland Rules of the Road; International Rules of the Road; navigation
regulations and equipment; routing measures; marine information; and
aids to navigation systems.

Agenda

    The agenda for the National Maritime Security Advisory Committee
meeting is as follows:

Friday, June 23, 2023

(1) Call to Order.
(2) Introduction.
(3) Designated Federal Official Remarks.
(4) Roll call of Committee members and determination of quorum.
(5) Remarks from Committee Leadership.
(6) Discussion of Tasks. The Committee will provide a final report of
recommendations on the following task:
    a. Task Statement 23-01: Review of NVIC 01-19 (CH 1) which
incorporated recommendations provided by Committee Resolution 21-02--
Navigation Safety in and around Offshore Renewable Energy Installations
(7) Public Comment Period.
(8) Adjournment of Meeting.

    A copy of all meeting documentation will be available by June 9,
2023, by going to the Coast Guard Homeport website, https://homeport.uscg.mil/, selecting the Missions tab, and navigating to the
Federal Advisory Committees section. Alternatively, you may contact Mr.
George Detweiler as noted in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION section above.
    There will be a public comment period at the end of meeting.
Speakers are requested to limit their comments to 3 minutes. Please
note that the public comment period may end before the period allotted,
following the last call for comments.
    Please contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above to register as a speaker.

    Dated: May 19, 2023.
Steven E. Ramassini,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Director, Marine Transportation
System.
[FR Doc. 2023-11029 Filed 5-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: May 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 98)]
[Notices]
[Page 28629]
[DOCID:fr21my10-101]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1909-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

Tennessee; Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-1909-DR), dated May 4, 2010, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: May 8, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Tennessee is hereby amended to include the following
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration
of May 4, 2010.

    Chester, Clay, DeKalb, Hardin, Jackson, Lauderdale, Lawrence,
Lewis, Macon, Stewart, Trousdale, and Wayne Counties for Individual
Assistance.
    Chester, Clay, DeKalb, Hardin, Jackson, Lauderdale, Lawrence,
Lewis, Macon, Stewart, Trousdale, and Wayne Counties for debris
removal and emergency protective measures (Categories A and B),
including direct Federal assistance, under the Public Assistance
program.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-12194 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 13, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64536-64539]
[FR Doc No: 2020-22640]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90119; File No. SR-MEMX-2020-11)

Self-Regulatory Organizations; MEMX LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Shorten the
Exchange's Post-Market Session To End at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time

October 7, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on October 2, 2020, MEMX LLC (``MEMX'' or the ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as
a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The

Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing with the Commission a proposed rule change
to proposed rule change to amend Exchange Rule 1.5(w) to shorten the
length of the Exchange's after-hours trading session (i.e., the Post-
Market Session \5\) to end at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time \6\ rather 8:00
p.m., and to make conforming changes to Exchange Rules 1.5(k) and
11.1(a). The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ ``Post-Market Session'' means the time between 4:00 p.m. and
8:00 p.m. Eastern Time. See Exchange Rule 1.5(w).
    \6\ All time references in this filing are to Eastern Time
unless otherwise noted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange offers three distinct trading sessions in which the
Exchange accepts orders from members of the Exchange (``Members'') for
potential execution: (1) The ``Pre-Market Session,'' which begins at
7:00 a.m. and continues until 9:30 a.m.,\7\ (2) ``Regular Trading
Hours,'' which begin at 9:30 a.m. and continue until 4:00 p.m.,\8\ and
(3) the ``Post-Market Session,'' which begins at 4:00 p.m. and
continues until 8:00 p.m.\9\ Members may designate when their orders
are eligible for execution by selecting their desired Time-in-Force
instruction.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ ``Pre-Market Session'' means the time between 7:00 a.m. and
9:30 a.m. See Exchange Rule 1.5(x).
    \8\ ``Regular Trading Hours'' means the time between 9:30 a.m.
and 4:00 p.m. See Exchange Rule 1.5(bb).
    \9\ See supra note 5.
    \10\ See Exchange Rule 11.6(o).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to shorten the length of
the Exchange's after-hours trading session by amending Exchange Rule
1.5(w), which defines Post-Market Session, to end the Post-Market
Session at 5:00 p.m. rather than 8:00 p.m. The Exchange submits that
shortening the Post-Market Session would allow the Exchange to utilize
its staff and resources in a more efficient manner while continuing to
provide Members with an after-hours trading session for one hour after
the close of the Regular Hours Session.
    The Exchange believes the proposal to reduce the operating time of
its Post-Market Session to end at 5:00 p.m. rather than 8:00 p.m. is
reasonable and appropriate given that only a very small percentage
(approximately 0.65%) of daily trading volume in NMS stocks occurs
during those hours,\11\ and as such the Exchange believes that the
costs to the Exchange associated with operating during those hours
outweigh the benefits to Members and other market participants.
Moreover, since the Exchange commenced trading operations on September
21, 2020 (supporting trading in seven NMS stocks), the Exchange has
received very few orders in the Post-Market Session, and all such
orders were received between 4:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. The Exchange
expects that it will continue to receive very few orders in the Post-
Market Session even after the Exchange completes its rollout of
supporting trading in all NMS stocks, and that the large majority of
such orders would continue to be received between 4:00 p.m. and 5:00
p.m. rather than between 5:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. To the extent the
Exchange in the future believes there is adequate demand to justify
operating a longer after-hours trading session, it will consider again
extending its hours to accommodate such demand.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Percentage calculated based on data from the week of
September 21, 2020. The Exchange receives and processes data made
available through consolidated data feeds (i.e., CTS and UTDF).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that other exchanges offer a longer after-hours
trading session after the close of Regular Trading Hours and that
Members and other market participants can choose to direct their orders
to those exchanges if they wish to participate in an after-hours
trading session extending beyond 5:00 p.m.\12\ The Exchange also notes
that other exchanges currently end their after-hours trading sessions
prior to 8 p.m., including three exchanges that close at 5:00 p.m.
consistent with the Exchange's proposal.\13\ Thus, the Exchange
believes that its proposal will adequately address the needs of Members
by providing for a one-hour Post-Market Session, which trade data show
is the period in which most of the after-hours trading activity occurs,
as described above, and would allow the Exchange to conserve resources
and staff time that would otherwise be dedicated to supporting the
Exchange's after-hours trading session for a four-hour period on every
trading day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See, e.g., Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. Rule 1.5(c), which
provides for an ``After Hours Trading Session'' from 4:00 p.m. to
8:00 p.m.; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. Rule 1.5(r), which provides for
a ``Post-Closing Session'' from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.; NYSE Arca
Equities, Inc. Rule 7.34-E.(a)(3), which provides for a ``Late
Trading Session'' that concludes at 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time; Nasdaq
Rule 4701(g), which provides for ``Post-Market Hours'' that end at
8:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
    \13\ See, e.g., New York Stock Exchange LLC Rule 51, which
provides that the trading session concludes at 4:00 p.m.; MIAX
PEARL, LLC Equities Rule 2600(a), which provides that orders may be
entered on such exchange until 4:00 p.m.; Investors Exchange LLC
Rule 1.160(aa), which provides for a ``Post-Market Session'' that
concludes at 5:00 p.m.; Long-Term Stock Exchange, Inc. Rule
1.160(ee), which provides for a ``Post-Market Session'' that
concludes at 5:00 p.m.; Nasdaq PHLX LLC Rule 3301(g), which provides
for ``Post-Market Hours'' that end at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to make conforming changes to Exchange
Rules 1.5(k) and 11.1(a) to reflect the Post-Market Session ending at
5:00 p.m. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule
1.5(k), which defines ``Exchange Operating Hours'' or ``Exchange
Hours,'' to reflect that the Exchange's daily trading hours, comprised
of all three trading sessions offered by the Exchange, would begin at
7:00 a.m. and continue until 5:00 p.m.\14\ The Exchange also proposes
to amend Exchange Rule 11.1(a) to update the hours of operations
referenced in that Rule consistent with the changes described above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ ``Exchange Operating Hours'' or ``Exchange Hours''
currently means the time between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. See
Exchange Rule 1.5(k).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6(b) \15\ of the Act, in general, and
furthers the objectives of Sections and 6(b)(5) \16\ of the Act, in
particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest; furthermore, the proposed rule change is not designed
to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, the Exchange believes its proposal to amend Rule
1.5(w) to shorten the length of its Post-Market

Session to end at 5:00 p.m. rather than 8:00 p.m. would allow the
Exchange to conserve its resources and staff time and focus these on
the Exchange's core business, which is providing an efficient and cost-
effective marketplace for trading in equity securities during Regular
Trading Hours, and other aspects of the Exchange's operations,
including its regulatory function, while maintaining a facility for
Members to execute trades for one hour after Regular Trading Hours.
Reducing the time during which the Post-Market Session operates would
allow the Exchange to maximize efficiencies and eliminate costs that
are associated with supporting trading operations during the longer
after-hours trading session but are not expected to yield a sufficient
economic return. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is
therefore consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act in that, by
seeking to operate in a more efficient manner that focuses on trading
during Regular Trading Hours and other aspects of the Exchange's
operations, including its regulatory function, it will operate to
promote just and equitable principles of trade and, in general, protect
investors and the public interest. The Exchange also believes that the
proposed rule change would not permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers because it would affect all
Members and market participants in the same way and to the same extent,
and is therefore consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act. Moreover,
the Exchange notes that there is precedent for an exchange shortening
the hours of its after-hours trading session (also changing from 8:00
p.m. to 5:00 p.m.) to allow it to utilize its staff time and resources
in a more efficient manner and focus these on other aspects of its
operations, so this aspect of the proposed rule change does not raise
any new or novel issues that have not previously been considered by the
Commission.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72215 (May 21,
2014), 79 FR 30678 (May 28, 2014) (rule change of National Stock
Exchange, Inc. shortening its after-hours trading session from 8:00
p.m. to 5:00 p.m.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed amendment to
Exchange Rule 1.5(w) furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(1) \18\
of the Act in that it would conserve Exchange resources, which are
expended to support trading operations during the Exchange's trading
hours, and would allow the Exchange to utilize these resources for
other purposes, including the Exchange's regulatory function, thereby
enabling it to be so organized as to have the capacity to be able to
carry out the purposes of the Act and to comply, and to enforce
compliance by its members, with the provisions of the Act, the rules
and regulations thereunder, and the rules of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes that the proposed amendments to Exchange
Rules 1.5(k) and 11.1(a) are consistent with the Act because the
amendments update those Rules to reference the proposed 5:00 p.m. time
as the time until which the Exchange would accept orders in the Post-
Market Session. No further substantive changes to those Rules are
proposed. The Exchange believes that it is appropriate to update all of
its rules that specifically reference the Exchange's operating hours so
that the Exchange's rules properly reflect the change to the Post-
Market Session being implemented in this proposed rule change.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the Act. By shortening the time period
during which its Post-Market Session operates, the Exchange is reducing
the number of equity exchanges offering an after-hours trading session
extending from after the close of Regular Trading Hours until 8:00 p.m.
However, the Exchange does not believe that this will inappropriately
burden competition in that, as proposed, the Exchange will continue to
offer a Post-Market Session until 5:00 p.m. and other exchanges offer
an after-hours trading session extending until 8:00 p.m.\19\ The
Exchange therefore believes that the availability of an after-hours
trading facility at other exchanges will provide Members and other
market participants with venues to which they can direct their after-
hours activity after the Exchange's proposed 5:00 p.m. Post-Market
Session end time and the reduction in the time frame during which the
Exchange's after-hours facility operates will not impair competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See supra note 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule
change would have any significant impact on inter-market competition as
there are other exchanges that already end their after-hours trading
sessions prior to 8:00 p.m., including at 5:00 p.m.,\20\ and other
marketplaces are free to provide similar trading hours. The Exchange
also does not believe that the proposed rule change would have any
significant impact on intra-market competition as all Members would be
subject to the modified hours of the Post-Market Session.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See supra note 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \21\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\22\
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly
affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose
any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \23\ and subparagraph (f)(6) of
Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \22\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \24\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has fulfilled this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \25\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\26\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal
may take effect immediately. The Exchange states that waiver of the 30-
day operative delay would allow the Exchange to immediately implement
the proposed change to the Post-Market Session, which would better
align the expenses of operating the Post-Market Session with the
expected volume and revenue associated with that trading session,
thereby allowing the Exchange to conserve resources and staff time and

focus these on the Exchange's core business and other aspects of the
Exchange's operations, including the Exchange's regulatory function.
The Commission believes that the proposed rule change raises no new or
novel issues and that waiver of the operative delay is consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest. Therefore, the
Commission hereby waives the operative delay and designates the
proposal operative upon filing.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \27\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \28\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-MEMX-2020-11 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MEMX-2020-11. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-MEMX-2020-11 and should be submitted on
or before November 3, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\29\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-22640 Filed 10-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68388-68392]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27066]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0774; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-154-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2006-22-
15, which applies to all Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD,
747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F,
747SR, and 747SP series airplanes. AD 2006-22-15 currently requires
repetitive inspections for cracking of certain panel webs and
stiffeners of the nose wheel well (NWW), and corrective actions if
necessary. AD 2006-22-15 also requires replacing certain panels with
new panels, which terminates the repetitive inspections. Since we
issued AD 2006-22-15, we received reports of fatigue cracking in the
panel webs and stiffeners of the NWW prior to the inspection threshold
of AD 2006-22-15. This proposed AD would reduce a compliance time and
add certain inspections and repair if necessary. We are proposing this
AD to prevent fatigue cracking of the NWW side and top panels, which
could result in a NWW depressurization event severe enough to reduce
the structural integrity of the fuselage.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 2, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0774; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6432; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0774;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-154-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On October 25, 2006, we issued AD 2006-22-15, Amendment 39-14812
(71 FR 64884, November 6, 2006), for all Boeing Model 747-100, 747-
100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400,
747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series

airplanes. AD 2006-22-15 requires repetitive inspections for cracking
of the top and side panel webs and panel stiffeners of the NWW, and
corrective actions if necessary. AD 2006-22-15 also requires replacing
the NWW side and top panels with new panels, which terminates the
repetitive inspections. We issued AD 2006-22-15 to prevent fatigue
cracks in the top and side panel webs and stiffeners of the NWW, which
could compromise the structural integrity of the NWW and lead to the
rapid decompression of the airplane.

Widespread Fatigue Damage

    Structural fatigue damage is progressive. It begins as minute
cracks, and those cracks grow under the action of repeated stresses.
This can happen because of normal operational conditions and design
attributes, or because of isolated situations or incidents such as
material defects, poor fabrication quality, or corrosion pits, dings,
or scratches. Fatigue damage can occur locally, in small areas or
structural design details, or globally. Global fatigue damage is
general degradation of large areas of structure with similar structural
details and stress levels. Multiple-site damage is global damage that
occurs in a large structural element such as a single rivet line of a
lap splice joining two large skin panels. Global damage can also occur
in multiple elements such as adjacent frames or stringers. Multiple-
site-damage and multiple-element-damage cracks are typically too small
initially to be reliably detected with normal inspection methods.
Without intervention, these cracks will grow, and eventually compromise
the structural integrity of the airplane, in a condition known as
widespread fatigue damage (WFD). As an airplane ages, WFD will likely
occur, and will certainly occur if the airplane is operated long enough
without any intervention.
    The FAA's WFD final rule (75 FR 69746, November 15, 2010) became
effective on January 14, 2011. The WFD rule requires certain actions to
prevent structural failure due to WFD throughout the operational life
of certain existing transport category airplanes and all of these
airplanes that will be certificated in the future. For existing and
future airplanes subject to the WFD rule, the rule requires that Design
Approval Holders (DAHs) establish a limit of validity (LOV) of the
engineering data that support the structural maintenance program.
Operators affected by the WFD rule may not fly an airplane beyond its
LOV, unless an extended LOV is approved.
    The WFD rule (75 FR 69746, November 15, 2010) does not require
identifying and developing maintenance actions if the DAHs can show
that such actions are not necessary to prevent WFD before the airplane
reaches the LOV. Many LOVs, however, do depend on accomplishment of
future maintenance actions. As stated in the WFD rule, any maintenance
actions necessary to reach the LOV will be mandated by airworthiness
directives through separate rulemaking actions.
    In the context of WFD, this action is necessary to enable DAHs to
propose LOVs that allow operators the longest operational lives for
their airplanes, and still ensure that WFD will not occur. This
approach allows for an implementation strategy that provides
flexibility to DAHs in determining the timing of service information
development (with FAA approval), while providing operators with
certainty regarding the LOV applicable to their airplanes.

Actions Since AD 2006-22-15, Amendment 39-14812 (71 FR 64884, November
6, 2006), Was Issued

    Since we issued AD 2006-22-15, Amendment 39-14812 (71 FR 64884,
November 6, 2006), we have received multiple reports of cracking in the
NWW side panel webs and stiffeners caused by fatigue. An operator
reported a crack on the right-hand panel of the NWW at 11,428 total
flight cycles, which is below the previous inspection threshold.
    The NWW top and side panels have been determined to be structure
that is susceptible to develop WFD. WFD analysis showed that post-
modification inspections are necessary to address the identified unsafe
condition. WFD could result in a NWW depressurization event severe
enough to reduce the structural integrity of the fuselage.

Relevant Service Information

    We reviewed the following Boeing service bulletins:
     Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2808, dated November
30, 2012;
     Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision 5, dated
July 11, 2013; and
     Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2562, Revision 3, dated
July 11, 2013.
    For information on the procedures and compliance times, see this
service information at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for
Docket No. FAA-2014-0774.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    Although this proposed AD does not explicitly restate certain
requirements of AD 2006-22-15, Amendment 39-14812 (71 FR 64884,
November 6, 2006), this proposed AD would retain all of the
requirements of AD 2006-22-15.
    The requirements specified in paragraphs (f), (g), (h), (i), (j),
and (l) of AD 2006-22-15, Amendment 39-14812 (71 FR 64884, November 6,
2006), are referenced in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision
5, dated July 11, 2013; which, in turn, is referenced in paragraphs (g)
and (h)(3) of this proposed AD.
    The requirement specified in paragraph (n) of AD 2006-22-15,
Amendment 39-14812 (71 FR 64884, November 6, 2006), is referenced in
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2562, Revision 3, dated July 11, 2013;
which, in turn, is referenced in paragraph (i) of this proposed AD.
    For Group 2 airplanes identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-
53A2562, Revision 1, dated July 28, 2005, and certain airplanes not
identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2562, Revision 1, dated
July 28, 2005, the requirement specified in paragraph (o) of AD 2006-
22-15, Amendment 39-14812 (71 FR 64884, November 6, 2006), to
accomplish a repair using a method approved by the FAA is now specified
in paragraph (i) of this proposed AD. However, for these airplanes, one
method of compliance for accomplishing the replacement is Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-53A2562, Revision 3, dated July 11, 2013.
Therefore, we have referred to Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2562,
Revision 3, dated July 11, 2013, in paragraph (i) of this proposed AD.
Operators may still request an alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
using the procedures provided in paragraph (p) of this AD.
    For certain other airplanes not identified in Boeing Service
Bulletin 747-53A2562, Revision 1, dated July 28, 2005, the requirement
specified in paragraph (o) of AD 2006-22-15, Amendment 39-14812 (71 FR
64884, November 6, 2006), to accomplish a repair method approved by the
FAA is now specified in paragraph (l) of this proposed AD. However, for
these airplanes, one method of compliance for

accomplishing the replacement is Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2808, dated November 30, 2012. Therefore, we have referred to Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2808, dated November 30, 2012, in
paragraph (l) of this proposed AD. Operators may still request an AMOC
using the procedures provided in paragraph (p) of this AD.
    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information identified previously, except as discussed
under ``Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service
Information.''
    The phrase ``related investigative actions'' is used in this
proposed AD. ``Related investigative actions'' are follow-on actions
that (1) are related to the primary actions, and (2) further
investigate the nature of any condition found. Related investigative
actions in an AD could include, for example, inspections.
    The phrase ``corrective actions'' is used in this proposed AD.
``Corrective actions'' are actions that correct or address any
condition found. Corrective actions in an AD could include, for
example, repairs.

Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service Information

    For airplanes with fewer than 15,000 total flight cycles, Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision 5, dated July 11, 2013,
recommends, in part, accomplishing a detailed inspection before the
accumulation of 13,000 total flight cycles. But, we have determined
that the 13,000-total-flight-cycle compliance time is insufficient to
address the identified unsafe condition soon enough to ensure an
adequate level of safety for the affected fleet, and instead are
proposing 10,000 total flight cycles. In developing an appropriate
compliance time for this detailed inspection, we considered the degree
of urgency associated with the subject unsafe condition, and the fact
that we have received a report of a 13-inch crack adjacent to a 2-inch
crack in the NWW right-hand side panel on an airplane with 11,428 total
flight cycles. This difference has been coordinated with The Boeing
Company.
    Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision 5, dated July 11,
2013, specifies to contact the manufacturer for instructions on how to
repair certain conditions, but this proposed AD would require repairing
those conditions in one of the following ways:
     In accordance with a method that we approve; or
     Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) whom we have
authorized to make those findings.

Explanation of Compliance Time

    The compliance time for the modification specified in paragraphs
(i) and (l) of this proposed AD for addressing WFD was established to
ensure that discrepant structure is modified before WFD develops in
airplanes. Standard inspection techniques cannot be relied on to detect
WFD before it becomes a hazard to flight. We will not grant any
extensions of the compliance time to complete any AD-mandated service
bulletin related to WFD without extensive new data that would
substantiate and clearly warrant such an extension.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 255 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
             Action                  Labor cost           Parts cost         Cost per product      operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections [actions retained    119 work-hours x   $0....................  $10,115 per        $2,579,325 per
 from AD 2006-22-15, Amendment    $85 per hour =                             inspection cycle.  inspection
 39-14812 (71 FR 64884,           $10,115 per                                                   cycle.
 November 6, 2006)].              inspection cycle.
Modification [actions retained   Up to 1,346 work-  Up to $144,248........  Up to $258,658...  Up to
 from AD 2006-22[dash]15,         hours x $85 per                                               $65,957,790.
 Amendment 39-14812 (71 FR        hour = $114,410.
 64884, November 6, 2006)].
Post-modification Inspections    119 work-hours x   $0....................  $10,115 per        $2,579,325 per
 [new proposed action].           $85 per hour =                             inspection cycle.  inspection
                                  $10,115 per                                                   cycle.
                                  inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. Amend Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2006-22-
15, Amendment 39-14812 (71 FR 64884, November 6, 2006), and adding the
following new AD:

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2014-0774; Directorate Identifier
2013-NM-154-AD.

 (a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by January 2,
2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2006-22-15, Amendment 39-14812 (71 FR 64884,
November 6, 2006).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B
SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-
400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes; certificated in any
category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by multiple reports of cracking in the nose
wheel well (NWW) top panel and side panel webs and stiffeners caused
by fatigue. We are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue cracking of
the NWW side and top panels, which could result in a NWW
depressurization event severe enough to reduce the structural
integrity of the fuselage.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Repetitive Inspections and Corrective Actions With New Compliance
Times

    Except as specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD,
at the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,''
of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision 5, dated July 11,
2013, do the actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and
(g)(3) of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision 5,
dated July 11, 2013; and do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions; in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision 5,
dated July 11, 2013, except as specified in paragraph (h)(3) of this
AD. Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions
before further flight. Repeat the inspections specified in
paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD thereafter at the
applicable intervals specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision 5, dated July 11,
2013. In table 2 and table 3 in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision 5, dated July 11,
2013, the date ``January 27, 2005,'' is the effective date of AD
2004-25-23, Amendment 39-13911 (69 FR 76839, December 23, 2004); and
the date ``May 10, 2005,'' is the effective date of AD 2005-09-02,
Amendment 39-14070 (70 FR 21141, April 25, 2005; corrected May 25,
2005 (70 FR 29940)).
    (1) Do an external detailed inspection for cracks of the top and
sidewall panel webs of the NWW (specified as Area 1 and Area 2 in
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision 5, dated July 11,
2013).
    (2) Do internal detailed and surface high frequency eddy current
(HFEC) inspections for cracks of the sidewall panel and top panel
stiffeners of the NWW (specified as Area 3 in Boeing Service
Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision 5, dated July 11, 2013).
    (3) Do an external detailed and ultrasonic testing (UT)
inspection for cracks of the top and sidewall panel webs.

(h) Exceptions to Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision 5,
Dated July 11, 2013

    (1) Table 1 in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service
Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision 5, dated July 11, 2013, applies to
airplanes with less than 15,000 total flight cycles ``as of the
Revision 5 date of this service bulletin.'' For this AD, however,
Table 1 applies to airplanes with the specified total flight cycles
as of the effective date of this AD.
    (2) Where Table 1 in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision 5, dated July 11, 2013,
specifies a compliance time of ``13,000 total flight-cycles,'' or
``within 1,000 flights cycles after the Revision 5 date of this
service bulletin,'' whichever occurs later, this AD requires
compliance before the accumulation of 10,000 total flight cycles or
within 1,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
    (3) If any cracking or damage is found during any inspection
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, and Boeing Service Bulletin
747-53A2465, Revision 5, dated July 11, 2013, specifies to contact
Boeing for appropriate action: Before further flight, repair the
cracking or damage using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (p) of this AD.

(i) NWW Modification

    For airplanes identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2562,
Revision 3, dated July 11, 2013: At the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-
53A2562, Revision 3, dated July 11, 2013, replace the left-side,
right-side, and top panels of the NWW, as applicable, with new
panels, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-53A2562, Revision 3, dated July 11, 2013. As of
the effective date of this AD, concurrently with doing the
replacement specified Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2562, Revision
3, dated July 11, 2013, do a detailed inspection for any cracks or
damage (including, but not limited to, dents and corrosion) in all
attaching structural elements that were common to the removed top
panel and side panels, as applicable, and do all applicable
corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2562, Revision 3,
dated July 11, 2013. If any crack or damage is found, before further
flight, repair the cracking or damage using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (p) of this
AD. In paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin
747-53A2562, Revision 3, dated July 11, 2013, the date ``December
11, 2006,'' is the effective date of AD 2006-22-15, Amendment 39-
14812 (71 FR 64884, November 6, 2006).

(j) Repetitive Post-Modification Inspections

    For airplanes on which the replacement specified in paragraph
(i) has been done: Except as required by paragraph (k) of this AD,
at the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,''
of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2562, Revision 3, dated July 11,
2013, do the actions specified in paragraphs (j)(1), (j)(2), and
(j)(3) of this AD. If any crack is found: Before further flight,
repair the cracking using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (p) of this AD. Repeat the
inspections specified in paragraphs (j)(1), (j)(2), and (j)(3) of
this AD thereafter at the applicable intervals specified in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-
53A2562, Revision 3, dated July 11, 2013.
    (1) Do an external detailed inspection for cracks in the side
panel webs, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2562, Revision 3, dated July 11,
2013.
    (2) Do an internal detailed inspection and HFEC inspection for
cracks in the top and side panel stiffeners, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2562,
Revision 3, dated July 11, 2013.
    (3) Do an external detailed inspection for cracks in the top
panel web, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2562, Revision 3, dated July 11,
2013.

(k) Exceptions to Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2562, Revision 3,
Dated July 11, 2013

    Where paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin
747-53A2562, Revision 3, dated July 11, 2013, specifies a compliance
time relative to the ``Revision 3

date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within
the specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD.

(l) NWW Modification for Certain Airplanes

    For airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2808, dated November 30, 2012: At the applicable time specified
in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-53A2808, dated November 30, 2012, or within 57 months after
December 11, 2006 (the effective date of AD 2006-22-15, Amendment
39-14812 (71 FR 64884, November 6, 2006)), whichever occurs later,
replace the left side, right side, and top panels of the NWW, as
applicable, with new panels; in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2808, dated
November 30, 2012. Concurrently with doing the replacement specified
in this paragraph, do a detailed inspection for cracks of the
attaching structural elements that were common to the removed top,
left-side, and right-side panels of the NWW, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2808, dated November 30, 2012. If any crack is found, before
further flight, repair the cracking using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (p) of this
AD.

(m) Repetitive Post-Modification Inspections for Certain Airplanes

    For airplanes on which the replacement specified in paragraph
(l) has been done: At the applicable time specified in paragraph
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2808,
dated November 30, 2012, do the actions specified in paragraphs
(l)(1), (l)(2), and (l)(3) of this AD. If any crack is found: Before
further flight, repair the cracking using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (p) of this
AD. Repeat the inspections specified in paragraphs (m)(1), (m)(2),
and (m)(3) of this AD thereafter at the applicable intervals
specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2808, dated November 30, 2012.
    (1) Do an external detailed inspection for cracks in the side
panel webs, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2808, dated November 30, 2012.
    (2) Do an internal detailed inspection and HFEC inspection for
cracks in the top and side panel stiffeners, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2808, dated November 30, 2012.
    (3) Do an external detailed inspection for cracks in the top
panel web, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2808, dated November 30, 2012.

(n) Terminating Action

    Replacing the left side, right side, and top panels of the NWW
with new panels as specified in paragraph (i) or (l) of this AD
terminates the inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD.

(o) Credit for Previous Actions

    (1) This paragraph restates the credit given in paragraph (k) of
AD 2006-22-15, Amendment 39-14812 (71 FR 64884, November 6, 2006).
    (i) This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, if those actions were performed before
January 27, 2005 (the effective date of AD 2005-09-02, Amendment 39-
14070 (70 FR 21141, April 25, 2005); corrected on May 25, 2005 (70
FR 29940)), using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2465, dated
April 5, 2001, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
    (ii) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, if those inspections were
performed before December 11, 2006 (the effective date of AD 2006-
22-15, Amendment 39-14812 (71 FR 64884, November 6, 2006)), using a
service bulletin identified in paragraph (o)(1)(ii)(A),
(o)(1)(ii)(B), or (o)(1)(ii)(C) of this AD, which are not
incorporated by reference in this AD.
    (A) Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision 1, dated
October 16, 2003.
    (B) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision 2, dated
November 11, 2004.
    (C) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2465, Revision 3, dated
December 23, 2004.
    (2) This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2465,
Revision 4, dated February 25, 2004, which is not incorporated by
reference in this AD.
    (3) This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD, using Boeing Service Bulletin
747-53A2562, Revision 1, dated July 28, 2005; or Boeing Service
Bulletin 747-53A2562, Revision 2, dated May 31, 2007; which are not
incorporated by reference in this AD.

(p) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (p)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA)
that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those
findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) AMOCs approved for AD 2006-22-15, Amendment 39-14812 (71 FR
64884, November 6, 2006), are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of this AD.
    (5) AMOCs approved for paragraph (o) of AD 2006-22-15, Amendment
39-14812 (71 FR 64884, November 6, 2006), are approved as AMOCs for
the corresponding provisions of paragraph (l) of this AD.

(q) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Bill Ashforth,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O.
Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 6, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-27066 Filed 11-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: December 23, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 247)]
[Notices]
[Page 78772-78773]
[DOCID:fr23de08-62]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings  1

December 4, 2008.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC09-23-000.
    Applicants: Shiloh Wind Project 2, LLC.
    Description: Response to Staff Request for Additional Information
and Request for Shortened Comment Period of Shiloh Wind Project 2, LLC.
    Filed Date: 12/03/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081203-5070.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 15, 2008.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER03-774-012.
    Applicants: Eagle Energy Partners I, LP.
    Description: Eagle Energy Partners I, L.P. Notice of Non-Material
Change.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081201-5121.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 22, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-739-014; ER08-649-005; ER07-501-010; ER06-738-
014.
    Applicants: Birchwood Power Partners, L.P.; EFS Parlin Holdings
LLC, East Coast Power Linden Holding, LLC, Cogen Technologies Linden
Venture, L.P.
    Description: Birchwood Power Partners, LP et al. submits a combined
triennial market power analysis.
    Filed Date: 11/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081202-0126.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 16, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-496-001; ER00-1372-004.
    Applicants: Alcoa Power Marketing, Inc.; Alcoa Power Generating,
Inc.
    Description: Alcoa Power Generating, Inc. et al. submits a
supplement to the 9/2/08 filing of the updated market power analysis.
    Filed Date: 11/26/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081202-0129.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-41-004.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England, Inc. et al. submits a report on a
timetable for a stakeholder process to study modeling of internal
transmission constraints and tie benefits associated with individual
lines and develop proposals to resolve these issues.
    Filed Date: 11/26/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081203-0075.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-567-001.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits an Amended
and Restated Settlement Agreement with the City of Anaheim, which
supersedes the Settlement Agreement filed on 8/4/08, to be effective 1/
14/09.
    Filed Date: 11/18/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081121-0132.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 09, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1323-001.
    Applicants: Fowler Ridge Wind Farm LLC.
    Description: Fowler Ridge Wind Farm LLC submits market-based power
sales tariff designated as FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 1,
Original Sheet 1-2.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081204-0040.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 22, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1423-001.
    Applicants: PHI.
    Description: PHI Companies et al. submits revised tariff sheets to
the PJM Interconnection, LLC Open Access Transmission Tariff necessary
to permit PHI Companies to recover the incentive rate treatments
authorized by the Commission.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081204-0041.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 22, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-315-001.
    Applicants: Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
    Description: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. submits
Notice of Cancellation of Service Agreement 8 for Wholesale Sales of
Electricity at Market-Based Rates, FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised
Volume 2 etc.
    Filed Date: 11/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081126-0125.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 16, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-343-000.
    Applicants: SC Landfill Energy, LLC.
    Description: SC Landfill Energy, LLC submits its Petition for
Acceptance of FERC Electric Tariff, Waivers and Blanket Authorization.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081204-0046.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 22, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-353-000.
    Applicants: Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
    Description: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc submits a
notice of cancellation for one hundred eighty-four firm and non-firm
transmission Service Agreements, pursuant to ConEdison's Open Access
Transmission Tariff, etc.
    Filed Date: 11/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081202-0050.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, December 19, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-354-000.
    Applicants: CAM Energy Trading LLC.
    Description: CAM Energy Trading, LLC submits Notice of Cancellation
of its market-based rate tariff, designated as Rate Schedule FERC 1
required by Order 614.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081204-0042.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 22, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-355-000.

    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool submits an executed Service
Agreement for Network Integration Transmission Service between SPP as
Transmission Provider and City of Prescott, Arkansas as Network
Customer, etc.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081204-0043.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 22, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-356-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc. and New England Power.
    Description: ISO New England, Inc. et al. submits revisions to the
Forward Capacity Market Rules.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081204-0045.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 22, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-357-000.
    Applicants: Portland General Electric Company.
    Description: Portland General Electric Company request for waiver
of Transmission Loading Relief-Eastern Interconnection standard
developed by WEQ, etc. & submits revised tariff sheets to reflect the
pending request for waiver for filing 11/26/08.
    Filed Date: 11/26/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081204-0038.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-358-000.
    Applicants: National Grid Generation LLC.
    Description: National Grid Generation LLC submits Original Sheet 91
et al. to its FERC Electric Rate Schedule 1, effective 1/15/09.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081204-0039.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 22, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-359-000.
    Applicants: Portland General Electric Company.
    Description: Portland General Electric Co submits the General
Transfer Agreement with Bonneville Power Administration.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20081204-0044.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 22, 2008.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-30451 Filed 12-22-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P