[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 6 (Thursday, January 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1645-1646]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00157]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No: FDA-2014-N-0001]

Science Board to the Food and Drug Administration; Notice of
Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Science Board to the Food and Drug
Administration (Science Board).
    General Function of the Committee: The Science Board provides
advice primarily to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and other
appropriate officials on specific complex scientific and technical
issues important to FDA and its mission, including emerging issues
within the scientific community. Additionally, the Science Board
provides advice to the Agency on keeping pace with technical and
scientific developments including in regulatory science; and input into
the Agency's research agenda; and on upgrading its scientific and
research facilities and training opportunities. It will also provide,
where requested, expert review of Agency sponsored intramural and
extramural scientific research programs.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on February 5, 2014, from
approximately 8:30 a.m. until 12:45 p.m.
    Location: FDA White Oak Campus, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31
Conference Center, the Great Room (Rm. 1503), Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002. Information regarding special accommodations due to a disability,
visitor parking, and transportation may be accessed at: http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm; under the heading
``Resources for You,'' click on ``Public Meetings at the FDA White Oak
Campus.'' Please note that visitors to the White Oak Campus must enter
through Building 1.
    Contact Person: Martha Monser, Office of the Commissioner, Food and
Drug Administration, Bldg. 32, Rm. 4286, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-
0572 in the Washington, DC area). A notice in the Federal Register
about last minute modifications that impact a previously announced
advisory committee meeting cannot always be published quickly enough to
provide timely notice. Therefore, you should always check the Agency's
Web site at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm and
scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee meeting link, or call
the advisory committee information line to learn about possible
modifications before coming to the meeting.
    Agenda: On February 5, 2014, the Science Board will discuss the
draft final report from the Global Health subcommittee. The Center for
Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) will present a response to the
CDRH Research Review subcommittee's report that was accepted by the
Science Board at its June 24, 2013, meeting. The Science Board will
hear a progress update from the Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research Post-Marketing Safety Review subcommittee. Finally, a
recipient of one of the FY 2013 Scientific Achievement Awards (selected
by the Science Board) will provide an overview of the activities for
which the award was given. FDA intends to make background material
available to the public no later than 2 business days before the
meeting. If FDA is unable to post the background material on its Web
site prior to the meeting, the background material will be made
publicly available at the location of the advisory committee meeting,
and the background material will be posted on FDA's Web site after the
meeting. Background material is available at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/Calendar/default.htm. Scroll down to the appropriate
advisory committee link.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee.
Written submissions may be made to the contact person on or before
January 29, 2014. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled
between approximately 12:10 p.m. and 12:40 p.m. Those individuals
interested in making formal oral presentations should notify the
contact person and submit a brief statement of the general nature of
the evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses
of proposed participants, and an indication of the approximate time
requested to make their presentation on or before January 21, 2014.
Time allotted for each presentation may be limited. If the number of
registrants requesting to speak is greater than can be reasonably
accommodated during the scheduled open public hearing session, FDA may
conduct a lottery to determine the speakers for the scheduled open
public hearing session. The contact person will notify interested
persons regarding their request to speak by January 22, 2014.
    Persons attending FDA's advisory committee meetings are advised
that the Agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical
outlets.
    FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with
physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special
accommodations due to a disability, please contact Martha Monser at
least 7 days in advance of the meeting.
    FDA is committed to the orderly conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our Web site at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm111462.htm for procedures
on public conduct during advisory committee meetings.

    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: January 6, 2014.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-00157 Filed 1-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register: September 19, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 183)]
[Notices]
[Page 54414]
[DOCID:fr19se08-68]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-3291-EM]

Mississippi; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of an Emergency
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for
the State of Mississippi (FEMA-3291-EM), dated August 30, 2008, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 8, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident
period for this emergency is closed effective September 8, 2008.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-21930 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61683-61684]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25627]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP11-548-000]

ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Application

    Take notice that on September 22, 2011, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR
Pipeline), 717 Texas Street, Suite 2400, Houston, Texas 77002-2761,
filed in Docket No. CP11-548-000, an application pursuant to Section
7(b) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Part 157 of the Commission's
regulations, requesting authorization to abandon its obligation to
provide transportation service through approximately 26 miles of 16-
inch diameter pipeline extending from an offshore production platform
in Mississippi Canyon Block 194 connecting with approximately 14 miles
of 18-inch diameter onshore pipeline to a point of connection with
Southern Natural Gas Company's pipeline facilities in the Romere Pass
Field, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, all as more fully set forth in
the application which is on file with the Commission and open to public
inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Commission's Web site
at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number, excluding the last three digits, in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY, (202)
502-8659.
    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to Rene
Staeb, Manager, Project Determinations & Regulatory Administration, ANR
Pipeline Company, 717 Texas Street, Houston, Texas 77002-2761 or by
calling<PHONE_NUMBER> (telephone) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (fax<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Pursuant to Section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding, or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 14 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only
parties to the

proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the
proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    Motions to intervene, protests and comments may be filed
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper; see, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

DATES: Comment Date: October 19, 2011.

    Dated: September 28, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-25627 Filed 10-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 18, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 74775-74777]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30402]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2011-1138]
RIN 1625-AA09

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Sacramento River, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing the operating schedule governing
the Freeport Drawbridge, mile 46.0, over the Sacramento River. The
bridge owner proposed to change the ``on demand'' bridge opening hours
and dates, due to a documented decrease in drawbridge openings compared
to other nearby bridges. The change is to address the issue of
misalignment between drawbridge staffing and actual drawbridge
operation, resulting in unnecessary staffing of the drawbridge during
periods of navigational inactivity.

DATES: This rule is effective January 17, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Comments and related materials received from the public, as
well as documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of Docket No. USCG-2011-1138 and are available online
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-1138 in the
``Search'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' This material is also
available for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility
(M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email David H. Sulouff, Chief, Bridge Section, Eleventh Coast
Guard District; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
ANPRM Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

A. Regulatory History and Information

    On January 25, 2012, we published an Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPRM), entitled Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Sacramento River, CA in the Federal Register (77 FR 3664). On August
10, 2012, we published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), entitled
Drawbridge Operation Regulation, Sacramento River, CA, in the Federal
Register (77 FR 47789). No public meeting was requested, and none was
held.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The Freeport Drawbridge is a swing span style drawbridge at mile
46.0, over

the Sacramento River, owned by the County of Sacramento and maintained
by Sacramento and Yolo counties. The drawbridge provides 190 feet
horizontal clearance, 29 feet of vertical clearance for vessels above
Mean High Water in the closed-to-navigation position and unlimited
vertical clearance when open. The Sacramento River is legally navigable
for bridge permitting purposes from its confluence with Suisun Bay to
mile 245.0 at Red Bluff, CA.
    Sacramento and Yolo counties submitted a joint request for a
permanent change to the Freeport Drawbridge operating requirements,
with support from Congressman Mike Thompson. The change is to address
the misalignment between drawbridge staffing and openings for vessels.
    The bridge owner has provided bridge operating statistics showing
significantly less drawspan operations during certain months and
evening hours in 2009-2010, than nearby bridges at Georgiana Slough,
Tyler Island and Walnut Grove. The statistical information and a
detailed explanation by the bridge owner have been included in the
docket (USCG-2011-1138-0003 & 0004) and are available for public
review. The bridge owner performed significant outreach to various
waterway user organizations including the Pacific Inter-Club Yacht
Association, the Recreational Boaters of California, the Capital City
Yacht Club, the Sacramento Yacht Club, River View Yacht Club and
Hornblower Cruises.

C. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule

    Sacramento and Yolo counties submitted a joint request for a change
to the Freeport Drawbridge operating requirements. Under the existing
operating regulations, Freeport Drawbridge opens on signal from May 1
through October 31 from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. and from November 1 through
April 30 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. At all other times, the draw shall open
on signal if at least four hours notice is given to the drawtender at
the Rio Vista bridge across the Sacramento River, mile 12.8. The
Counties proposed to change the ``on demand'' bridge opening hours to
May 1 through September 30, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. At all other times
(including November 1 through April 30), the draw shall open on signal
if at least four hours notice is given to the drawtender at the Rio
Vista bridge across the Sacramento River, mile 12.8. This will allow
the bridge owner to remove the bridge operator from the drawbridge
until needed for scheduled bridge openings, providing a possible
monetary savings to the Counties due to reduced bridge operating
personnel costs. There is no alternative route for vessels navigating
on this reach of the waterway. Vessels that can be safely navigated
through the drawbridge while it is in the closed to navigation position
may continue to do so at any time.
    Submissions 0001-0009 in the electronic docket were posted by the
Coast Guard. The single public comment (USCG-2011-1138-0010) referred
to the advance notice period as ``closure'', recommended an October 15
start date due to Fleet Week, observed the statistical period was
during the economic downturn and associated decline in vessel transits,
and recommended a wider dissemination to all California boat owners.
The ``advance notice'' period is not a closure but a period when vessel
operators call the bridge owner in advance to schedule a bridge opening
upon their arrival at the bridge. The statistics provided included the
October Fleet Week transits and support the proposed change to the
regulation. The economy may influence the number of vessel transits and
upon economic recovery and associated increase in navigation, proposals
to readjust the operating regulation may be submitted by anyone in
compliance with 33 CFR 117.8. The ANPRM and NPRM were disseminated via
publication in the Federal Register and also the Coast Guard Local
Notice to Mariners between January 4, 2012, and September 24, 2012. The
bridge owner held numerous meetings with leading vessel owner
organizations prior to submitting their proposal to the Coast Guard.
The required methods and extent of outreach to the public was met or
exceeded. We encourage the public to read the Federal Register and
Coast Guard Local Notice to Mariners to be informed of proposed
actions.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this final rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    Bridge operating statistics provided by the bridge owner during
2009-2010, show significantly fewer drawspan operations than nearby
bridges at Georgiana Slough, Tyler Island and Walnut Grove due to
greater vertical clearance provided by the Freeport drawbridge.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    This rule will adjust an existing advance notice requirement for
bridge openings to more closely conform to the existing needs of
navigation, while allowing the bridge owner to reduce bridge operation
costs, as documented by the statistics provided by the bridge owner.
Vessels that can safely transit under the bridge while in the closed to
navigation position, may continue to do so at any time.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain

about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the ``FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT'' section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
    Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Revise Sec.  117.189 to read as follows:

Sec.  117.189  Sacramento River.

    (a) The draws of each bridge from Isleton to the American River
junction except for the Sacramento County highway bridge across the
Sacramento River, mile 46.0 at Freeport, shall open on signal from May
1 through October 31 from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. and from November 1 through
April 30 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. At all other times, the draws shall open
on signal if at least four hours notice is given to the drawtender at
the Rio Vista bridge across the Sacramento River, mile 12.8.
    (b) The draw of the Sacramento County highway bridge, mile 46.0 at
Freeport, shall open on signal from May 1 through September 30 from 9
a.m. to 5 p.m. At all other times, the draw shall open on signal if at
least four hours notice is give to the drawtender at the Rio Vista
Bridge across the Sacramento River, mile 12.8.
    (c) The draws of the California Department of Transportation
bridges, mile 90.1 at Knights Landing, and mile 135.5 at Meridian,
shall open on signal if at least 12 hours notice is given to the
California Department of Transportation at Marysville.
    (d) The draws of the bridges above Meridian need not be opened for
the passage of vessels.

    Dated: November 20, 2012.
Karl L. Schultz,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2012-30402 Filed 12-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 11, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28776-28779]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10093]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2022-0330]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Potomac River, Between Charles County, MD, and King
George County, VA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
certain waters of the Potomac River. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of persons, and the marine environment from the
potential safety hazards associated with construction operations at the
new Governor Harry W. Nice/Senator Thomas ``Mac'' Middleton Memorial
(US-301) Bridge, which will occur from May 16, 2022, through June 18,
2022. This rule will prohibit persons and vessels from being in the
safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Maryland-
National Capital Region or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m. on May 16, 2022, through 8
p.m. on June 18, 2022.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2022-0330 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Ron Houck, Sector Maryland-NCR, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard: telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
Sec.  Section
TFR Temporary final rule
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On April 21, 2022, Skanska-Corman-McLean, Joint Venture notified
the Coast Guard that the company will be setting pier protection fender
ring

precast segments adjacent to the Federal navigation channel at the new
Governor Harry W. Nice/Senator Thomas ``Mac'' Middleton Memorial (US-
301) Bridge. Details of the operation were provided to the Coast Guard
on April 27, 2022. A total of ten pier protection fender ring precast
segments are to be set at two pier protection fender rings, which are
located on each side of the Federal navigation channel. The setting of
these segments is required to complete the construction of the bridge
pier protection. The setting of each precast segment will require a
minimum of two days and will be conducted between 7 a.m. and 8 p.m.
from May 16, 2022, to June 18, 2022. The setting of four of the ten
precast segments, two segments at each pier protection fender ring,
described by the contractor does not require placing equipment within
the Federal navigation channel.
    The setting of six of the ten precast segments, three segments at
each pier protection fender ring, described by the contractor requires
the movement in and anchoring at multiple points of a large crane barge
within the Federal navigation channel. This crane can accommodate all
of the 250-ton fender ring precast segments to be hoisted and placed
precisely. The required sequence of the work involved means that heavy
lift operations conducted from within the Federal navigation channel
will not be completed continuously. On days when this work will be
conducted, the large crane barge will be required to remain within the
Federal navigation channel between 8 p.m. and 7 a.m., which will
streamline the operation by avoiding the more than four hours it takes
to demobilize and transport the large crane barge and its associated
anchoring equipment, thereby reducing the time in the channel by
several days. This operation will impede vessels requiring the use of
the channel.
    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. Construction operations involving
large crane heavy lifts at the new Governor Harry W. Nice/Senator
Thomas ``Mac'' Middleton Memorial (US-301) Bridge must occur within the
Federal navigation channel. Immediate action is needed to respond to
the potential safety hazards associated with bridge construction.
Hazards from the construction operations include low-hanging or falling
ropes, cables, large cement cast portions, dangerous projectiles, and
or other debris. We must establish this safety zone by May 16, 2022, to
guard against these hazards.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest
because immediate action is needed to respond to the potential safety
hazards associated with construction operations at the new Governor
Harry W. Nice/Senator Thomas ``Mac'' Middleton Memorial (US-301) Bridge
to be conducted within the Federal navigation channel.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The COTP has determined that
potential hazards associated with bridge construction starting May 16,
2022 will be a safety concern for anyone within the Federal navigation
channel at the new Governor Harry W. Nice/Senator Thomas ``Mac''
Middleton Memorial (US-301) Bridge construction site. This rule is
needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the
navigable waters within the safety zone while the bridge is being
constructed.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a temporary safety zone from 7 a.m. on May
16, 2022, through 8 p.m. on June 16, 2022. The safety zone will cover
all navigable waters of the Potomac River encompassed by a line
connecting the following points beginning at 38[deg]21'50.96'' N,
076[deg]59'22.04'' W, thence south to 38[deg]21'43.08'' N,
076[deg]59'20.55'' W, thence west to 38[deg]21'41.00'' N,
076[deg]59'34.90'' W, thence north to 38[deg]21'48.90'' N,
076[deg]59'36.80'' W, and east back to the beginning point located
between Charles County, MD, and King George County, VA.
    The duration of the zone is intended to protect personnel and the
marine environment in these navigable waters while pier protection
fender ring precast segments are being set at the new Governor Harry W.
Nice/Senator Thomas ``Mac'' Middleton Memorial (US-301) Bridge. Except
for marine equipment and vessels operated by Skanska-Corman-McLean,
Joint Venture, or its subcontractors, no vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region or a designated
representative.
    The COTP will notify the public that the safety zone will be
enforced by all appropriate means to the affected segments of the
public, as practicable, in accordance with 33 CFR 165.7(a). Such means
of notification will also include, but are not limited to, Broadcast
Notice to Mariners. Vessels or persons violating this rule are subject
to the penalties set forth in 46 U.S.C. 70036 (previously codified in
33 U.S.C. 1232) and 46 U.S.C. 70052 (previously codified in 50 U.S.C.
192).

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on size of the safety
zone. The temporary safety zone is approximately 450 yards in width and
270 yards in length. This safety zone will impact a small designated
area of the Potomac River for 34 days, but we anticipate that there
will be no vessels that are unable to conduct business. Excursion
vessels and commercial fishing vessels are not impacted by this
rulemaking. Excursion vessels do not operate in this area, and
commercial fishing vessels are not impacted because of their draft.
Some towing vessels may be impacted, but bridge project personnel have
been conducting outreach throughout the project in order to coordinate
with those vessels. Vessel traffic, including recreational vessels, not
required to use the navigation channel will be able to safely transit
around the safety zone. Such vessels may be able to transit to the east
or the west of the Federal

navigation channel, as similar vertical clearance and water depth exist
under the next bridge span to the east and west. Moreover, the Coast
Guard will issue Local Notices to Mariners and a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
temporary safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in
section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
temporary safety zone lasting 34 total days that will prohibit entry
within a portion of the Potomac River. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of
DHS Instruction manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T05-0330 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T05-0330   Safety Zone; Potomac River, Between Charles
County, MD and King George County, VA.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of the Potomac River, encompassed by a line connecting the
following points beginning at 38[deg]21'50.96'' N, 076[deg]59'22.04''
W, thence south to 38[deg]21'43.08'' N, 076[deg]59'20.55'' W, thence
west to 38[deg]21'41.00'' N, 076[deg]59'34.90'' W, thence north to
38[deg]21'48.90'' N, 076[deg]59'36.80'' W, and east back to the
beginning point, located between Charles County, MD, and King George
County, VA. These coordinates are based on datum NAD 83.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section--
    Captain of the Port (COTP) means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
    Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty
officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal,
State, and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region (COTP) in the enforcement of the
safety zone.
    Marine equipment means any vessel, barge or other equipment
operated by

Skanska-Corman-McLean, Joint Venture, or its subcontractors.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, except for marine equipment, you may not enter
the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER> or on Marine Band Radio
VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Those in the safety zone must comply
with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
    (d) Enforcement officials. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in
the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and
local agencies.
    (e) Enforcement period. The section will be enforced from 7 a.m. on
May 16, 2022, through 8 p.m. on June 18, 2022.

    Dated: May 5, 2022.
David E. O'Connell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Maryland-National
Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2022-10093 Filed 5-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: December 28, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 247)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 68501-68505]
[DOCID:fr28de09-8]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0911; Directorate Identifier 2002-NM-12-AD;
Amendment 39-16138; AD 2009-26-03]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-300, -400, -500, -600,
-700, -700C, -800, and -900, and 747-400 Series Airplanes; and Model
757, 767, and 777 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 737-300, -400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and
-900, and 747-400 series airplanes; and Model 757, 767, and 777
airplanes. This AD requires modifying the static inverter by replacing
resistor R170 with a new resistor and relocating the new resistor. This
AD results from evaluation of the carbon resistor, which revealed a
failure

mode that can cause the resistor to ignite, involving adjacent
capacitors as well. We are issuing this AD to prevent a standby static
inverter from overheating, which could result in smoke in the flight
deck and cabin and loss of the electrical standby power system.

DATES: This AD becomes effective February 1, 2010.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of February 1,
2010.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.
O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Binh V. Tran, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The FAA issued a second supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to
certain Boeing Model 737-300, -400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, and
-900, and 747-400 series airplanes; and Model 757, 767, and 777
airplanes. That second supplemental NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on January 12, 2009 (74 FR 1159). That second supplemental
NPRM proposed to require modifying the static inverter by replacing
resistor R170 with a new resistor and relocating the new resistor.

Actions Since Issuance of Second Supplemental NPRM

    Since issuance of the second supplemental NPRM, Boeing has issued
the revised service bulletins listed in the following table:

                        Revised Service Bulletins
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Model--                              Boeing--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
737-300, -400, -500 series     Alert Service Bulletin 737-24A1166,
 airplanes.                     Revision 4, dated May 21, 2009.
757-200, -200CB, -200PF        Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-24-
 series airplanes.              0110, Revision 1, dated August 6, 2009.
757-300 series airplanes.....  Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-24-
                                0111, Revision 1, dated August 6, 2009.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No additional work is necessary for airplanes on which the
modification specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-24A1166,
Revision 3, dated July 25, 2007, has been done. Revision 4 clarifies
certain sections, moves airplanes from Group 2 to Group 1 in the
effectivity, and removes the Group 2 work instructions.
    Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-24-0110, Revision 1,
dated August 6, 2009, adds an inspection of certain static inverter
part numbers to make sure only approved part numbers are installed;
however, the proposed modification requires modifying the static
inverter by replacing the resistor with a new resistor having an
approved part number. Revision 1 also moves airplanes from Group 2 to
Group 1 in the effectivity, and the Group 2 work instructions were
deleted. Therefore, no additional work is necessary for airplanes
modified in accordance with Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
757-24-0110, dated April 28, 2005.
    Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-24-0111, Revision 1,
dated August 6, 2009, also adds an inspection of certain static
inverter part numbers to make sure only approved part numbers are
installed; however, the proposed modification requires modifying the
static inverter by replacing the resistor with a new resistor having an
approved part number. Revision 1 also moves airplanes from Group 2 to
Group 1 in the effectivity, and the Group 2 work instructions were
deleted. No additional work is necessary for airplanes modified in
accordance with Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-24-0111,
dated April 28, 2005.
    We have revised Table 1 of this AD to refer to the latest revisions
of the service bulletins and added a new paragraph (h) to this AD to
give credit for actions done in accordance with the earlier revisions
that were referenced in Table 1 of the NPRM.

Comments

    We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comments received on the
second supplemental NPRM.

Support for the Second Supplemental NPRM

    Northwest Airlines has no objection to the second supplemental
NPRM; Boeing concurs with the content of the second supplemental NPRM.

Request To Permit Installation of Static Inverters Having Certain Part
Numbers

    American Airlines (AAL) and FedEx Express request that we allow
installation of static inverters having certain part numbers.
    AAL asks that we permit installation of static inverters having
part numbers (P/Ns) S282T004-2, -3, and -4. AAL states that those
static inverters do not have an overheating safety concern, which is
the unsafe condition addressed in the second supplemental NPRM. AAL
adds that static inverters that have P/Ns S282T004-2, -3, and -4 are
fully interchangeable on the Model 757 fleet.
    FedEx Express asks that Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
757-24-0110, dated April 28, 2005, be revised to include Avionics
Instruments static inverters having P/Ns S282T004-28 and S282T004-30 as
acceptable to remain on Model 757 airplanes. FedEx Express adds that
since issuance of the original issue of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 757-24-0110, those static inverters have been
installed on some Model 757 airplanes and have been added to the Boeing
Illustrated Parts Catalog. FedEx Express notes that P/Ns S282T004-2, -
3, -4, -28, and -30 should be the P/Ns for the static inverters
installed in accordance with the requirements in the second

supplemental NPRM. FedEx Express adds that combining Groups 1 and 2
into one group would accomplish this task.
    We agree with the commenters' requests and provide the following
explanation. As noted previously, Boeing has issued Special Attention
Service Bulletin 757-24-0110, Revision 1, dated August 6, 2009. The
effectivity specified in Revision 1 is changed to move airplanes from
Group 2 to Group 1, and to remove the Group 2 work instructions by
combining Group 2 work instructions with Group 1. The work instructions
specified in Revision 1 also add an inspection for certain static
inverter part numbers that allows for installation of static inverters
having P/Ns S282T004-2, -3, -4, -25, -28, and -30. Inspection of the
static inverter P/Ns will prevent unnecessary replacement of approved
static inverters. We have changed the applicability in paragraph (c) of
this AD to identify Revision 1 of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 757-24-0110.

Request To Include Revised Service Information

    AAL states that it found a discrepancy in Figure 1 of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-24-0160, dated June 30, 2005
(referred to in the second supplemental NPRM), and asks that this
service bulletin be revised to correct the discrepancy. AAL adds that
the discrepancy is in Figure 1, which specifies an inspection of the
static inverter on Groups 1 and 3 airplanes. Figure 2 also contains an
error which specifies the actions are applicable to Group 3 airplanes.
However, Group 2 airplanes are not identified in either of these
figures. AAL also notes that in Boeing Service Message 1-1156909141-2,
Boeing specifies that static inverters having P/Ns S282T004-2, -3, -4
are acceptable for installation across the Model 757 airplane fleet
since the Model 767 airplane fleet uses the same static inverter.
    We acknowledge the commenter's concern and agree that the error in
Figure 1 of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-24-0160,
dated June 30, 2005, should be corrected in a revision; but we do not
consider that delaying the final rule until after the release of a
future revision is warranted. The original issue of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 767-24-0160 includes sufficient information
to accomplish the modification of the static inverter. However, we have
added new paragraph (g) to this AD to exclude Group 2 airplanes that
have a static inverter with part number S282T004-2, S282T004-3, or
S282T004-4, from the modification requirement. We have re-identified
subsequent paragraphs accordingly.

Request To Change Cost Impact Section

    AAL states that the cost estimate for material and labor necessary
for accomplishing the modification on its airplanes is more than the
estimate in the second supplemental NPRM.
    We infer that AAL is asking that the work hours and cost specified
in the Cost Impact section of the AD be increased. We do not agree. The
cost information below describes only the direct costs of the specific
actions required by this AD. Based on the best data available, the
manufacturer provided the number of work hours (up to 2 hours,
depending on airplane configuration) necessary to do the required
actions. This number represents the time necessary to perform only the
actions actually required by this AD. We recognize that, in doing the
actions required by an AD, operators might incur incidental costs in
addition to the direct costs. The cost analysis in AD rulemaking
actions, however, typically does not include incidental costs such as
the time required to gain access and close up, time necessary for
planning, or time necessitated by other administrative actions. Those
incidental costs, which might vary significantly among operators, are
almost impossible to calculate. We have not changed the AD in this
regard.

Request for Clarification

    Cargolux Airlines International S.A. states that it has followed
the history of the proposed rule since 2003, and is not aware of any
new event reported on the static inverters since that time. Cargolux
asks for clarification that only one airplane was affected prior to
2003, and no airplanes were affected after 2003. Cargolux also asks for
the number of occurrences of R170 resistors overheating, and the number
of units manufactured.
    We acknowledge the commenter's request and provide the following
clarification. Prior to 2003 there were 39 static inverter failures on
39 airplanes; since 2003 there have been 15 inverters on 15 airplanes
that failed due to the R170 resistor overheating, and approximately
9,400 units have been manufactured.

Explanation of Additional Paragraph in the Final Rule

    We have added a new paragraph (d) to this AD to provide the Air
Transport Association (ATA) of America code 24: Electrical power. This
code is added to make this AD parallel with other new AD actions. We
have reidentified subsequent paragraphs accordingly.

Conclusion

    We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously.
We have determined that these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    There are approximately 3,856 airplanes of the affected design in
the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 1,882 airplanes of U.S.
registry will be affected by this AD. The following table provides the
estimated costs for U.S. operators to comply with this AD.

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of U.S.-
             Action                  Work hours       Average labor        Parts        Cost per airplane     registered             Fleet cost
                                                      rate per hour                                           airplanes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification...................  Up to 2 hours,                 $80               $0   Between $80 and              1,882   Up to $301,120.
                                  depending on                                          $160.
                                  airplane
                                  configuration.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of
this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in
the future if the AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures
discussed in AD rulemaking actions represent only the

time necessary to perform the specific actions actually required by the
AD. These figures typically do not include incidental costs, such as
the time required to gain access and close up, planning time, or time
necessitated by other administrative actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec.  39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

2009-26-03 Boeing: Amendment 39-16138. Docket No. FAA-2009-0911;
Directorate Identifier 2002-NM-12-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD becomes effective February 1, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to the following airplanes, certificated in
any category, as identified in the applicable Boeing service
bulletin specified in Table 1 of this AD:

                         Table 1--Applicability
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Model--                              Boeing--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -  Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-24-
 900 series airplanes.          1165, Revision 1, dated October 20,
                                2005.
737-300, -400, -500 series     Alert Service Bulletin 737-24A1166,
 airplanes.                     Revision 4, dated May 21, 2009.
747-400, -400D, -400F series   Service Bulletin 747-24-2254, Revision 1,
 airplanes.                     dated March 5, 2007.
757-200, -200CB, -200PF        Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-24-
 series airplanes.              0110, Revision 1, dated August 6, 2009.
757-300 series airplanes.....  Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-24-
                                0111, Revision 1, dated August 6, 2009.
767-200, -300, -300F series    Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-24-
 airplanes.                     0160, dated June 30, 2005.
767-400ER series airplanes...  Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-24-
                                0161, dated June 30, 2005.
777-200, -300, -300ER series   Service Bulletin 777-24-0095, Revision 1,
 airplanes.                     dated January 3, 2007.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24:
Electrical power.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD results from evaluation of the carbon resistor,
which revealed a failure mode that can cause the resistor to ignite,
involving adjacent capacitors as well. The Federal Aviation
Administration is issuing this AD to prevent a standby static
inverter from overheating, which could result in smoke in the flight
deck and cabin and loss of the electrical standby power system.

Modification

    (f) At the time specified in paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this
AD, as applicable: Modify the static inverter by removing resistor
R170 from the logic control card assembly and replacing it with a
new resistor, and relocating the new resistor to the solder side of
the printed circuit board, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service bulletin specified in Table 1
of this AD, except as provided by paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (1) For Model 737, 757, and 767 airplanes: Within 42 months
after the effective date of this AD.
    (2) For Model 747 and 777 airplanes: Within 60 months after the
effective date of this AD.
    (g) For Group 2 airplanes identified Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 767-24-0160, dated June 30, 2005: Airplanes having
a static inverter with part number S282T004-2, S282T004-3, or
S282T004-4, are not required to do the modification specified in
paragraph (f) of this AD.
    (h) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with the applicable Boeing service bulletin specified in
Table 2 of this AD, are considered acceptable for compliance with
the corresponding actions specified in this AD.

                                 Table 2--Previously Issued Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Boeing --                            Revision--                           Dated--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alert Service Bulletin 737-24A1166......  3..............................  July 25, 2007.
Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-   Original.......................  April 28, 2005.
 24-0110.
Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-   Original.......................  April 28, 2005.
 24-0111.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Note 1:  The Boeing service bulletins specified in Table 1 of
this AD refer to Avionic Instruments Inc. Service Bulletins 1-002-
0102-1000-24-28, Revision A, dated June 22, 2005; and Revision B,
dated July 24, 2006; as additional sources of guidance for
accomplishing the modification required by paragraph (f) of this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

    (i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Binh V. Tran, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment
Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
917-6485; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Or, e-mail information to 9-ANM-
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (j) You must use the applicable Boeing service information
contained in Table 3 of this AD to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.

                                   Table 3--Material Incorporated by Reference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Boeing--                             Revision--                           Dated--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alert Service Bulletin 737-24A1166......  4..............................  May 21, 2009.
Service Bulletin 747-24-2254............  1..............................  March 5, 2007.
Service Bulletin 777-24-0095............  1..............................  January 3, 2007.
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-   1..............................  October 20, 2005.
 24-1165.
Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-   1..............................  August 6, 2009.
 24-0110.
Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-   1..............................  August 6, 2009.
 24-0111.
Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-   Original.......................  June 30, 2005.
 24-0160.
Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-   Original.......................  June 30, 2005.
 24-0161.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 4, 2009.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-29963 Filed 12-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 18615]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07240]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL16-44-000]

Talen Energy Marketing, LLC; Notice of Institution of Section 206
Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On March 22, 2016, the Commission issued an order in Docket No.
EL16-44-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16
U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into the justness and
reasonableness of Talen Energy Marketing, LLC's reactive power rate for
its fleet in the PPL Zone of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Talen Energy
Marketing, LLC, 154 FERC ] 61,226 (2016).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL16-44-000, established
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication
of this notice in the Federal Register.

    Dated: March 22, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-07240 Filed 3-30-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 205 (Monday, October 24, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 73192]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25670]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Eighth RTCA SC-233 Addressing Human Factors/Pilot Interface
Issues for Avionics Plenary

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Eighth Plenary of RTCA SC-233 Addressing Human Factors/Pilot
Interface Issues for Avionics.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a
meeting of Eighth Plenary of RTCA SC-233 Addressing Human Factors/Pilot
Interface Issues for Avionics.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 15-17, 2016 08:30 a.m.-04:30
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: Cessna Employees Fitness
Center, 6711 W 31st St S., Wichita, Kansas 67215.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Rebecca Morrison at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or<PHONE_NUMBER>, or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th
Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202)
833-9339, fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is
hereby given for a meeting of the Eighth RTCA SC-233 Addressing Human
Factors/Pilot Interface Issues for Avionics Plenary. The agenda will
include the following:

Tuesday November 15, 2016

A.M.

     Introduction, Upcoming PMC Dates and Deliverable
     Review of TOR
     September meeting summary
     Roadmap for remaining items to be completed; notional
schedule of activities remaining
     Consensus on document review process

P.M.

     Overview of the combined document and initial feedback
     Detailed review of document and identification of work to
be done

Wednesday November 16, 2016

     Working Groups Break Out Sessions
     End of the Day Working Group Status Report Outs

Thursday November 17, 2016

A.M.

     Working Groups Break Out Session

P.M.

     Working Group Status
     Working group leader reports
     Follow-on actions
     Meeting Recap, Action Items, Key Dates
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 19, 2016.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17,
NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-25670 Filed 10-21-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: November 28, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 228)]
[Notices]
[Page 67325-67326]
[DOCID:fr28no07-74]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Request for Review by OMB

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 15c3-3; SEC File No. 270-087; OMB Control No. 3235-0078.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
requests for extension of the previously approved collections of
information discussed below. The Code of Federal Regulation citation to
this collection of information is the following rule: 17 CFR 240.15c3-3
Customer Protection--Reserves and Custody of Securities.
    Rule 15c3-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78a et seq.) requires that a broker-dealer that hold customer
securities obtain and maintain possession and control of fully-paid and
excess margin securities they hold for customers. In addition, the Rule
requires that a broker-dealer that holds customer funds make either a
weekly or monthly computation to determine whether certain customer
funds need to be segregated in a special reserve bank account for the
exclusive benefit of the firm's customers. It also requires that a
broker-dealer maintain a written notification from each bank where a
Special Reserve Bank Account is held acknowledging that all assets in
the account are for the exclusive benefit of the broker-dealer's
customers, and to provide written notification to the Commission (and
its designated examining authority) under certain, specified
circumstances. Finally, Rule 15c3-3 was amended in 2001 to add
paragraph (o), which only applies to broker-dealers that sell
securities futures products to customers. Paragraph (o) requires that
such broker-dealers provide certain notifications to customers, and to
make a record of any changes of account type.
    There are approximately 344 broker-dealers fully subject to the
Rule (i.e., broker-dealers that can not claim any of the exemptions
enumerated at paragraph (k)), of which approximately 9 make daily, 245
make weekly, and 90 make monthly, reserve computations. On average,
each of these respondents require approximately 2.5 hours to complete a
computation. Accordingly, Commission staff estimates that the resulting
burden totals 39,950 hours annually ((2.5 hours x 240 computations x 9
respondents that calculate daily) + (2.5 hours x 52 computations x 245
respondents that calculate weekly) + (2.5 hours x 12 computations x 90
respondents that calculate monthly)).
    A broker-dealer required to maintain the Special Reserve Bank
Account prescribed by Rule 15c3-3 must obtain

and retain a written notification from each bank in which it has a
Special Reserve Bank Account to evidence bank's acknowledgement that
assets deposited in the Account are being held by the bank for the
exclusive benefit of the broker-dealer's customers. As stated
previously, 344 broker-dealers are presently fully-subject to Rule
15c3-3. In addition, 140 broker-dealers operate in accordance with the
exemption provided in paragraph (k)(2)(i) which also requires that a
broker-dealer maintain a Special Reserve Bank Account. The staff
estimates that of the total broker-dealers that must comply with this
rule, only 25%, or 121 ((344 + 140) x .25) must obtain 1 new letter
each year (either because the broker-dealer changed the type of
business it does and became subject to either paragraph (e)(3) or
(k)(2)(i) or simply because the broker-dealer established a new Special
Reserve Bank Account). The staff estimates that it would take a broker-
dealer approximately 1 hour to obtain this written notification from a
bank regarding a Special Reserve Bank Account because the language in
these letters is largely standardized. Therefore, Commission staff
estimates that broker-dealers will spend approximately 121 hours each
year to obtain these written notifications.
    In addition, a broker-dealer must immediately notify the Commission
and its designated examining authority if it fails to make a required
deposit to its Special Reserve Bank Account. Commission staff estimates
that broker-dealers file approximately 65 such notices per year.
Broker-dealers would require approximately 30 minutes, on average, to
file such a notice. Therefore, Commission staff estimates that broker-
dealers would spend a total of approximately 33 hours each year to
comply with the notice requirement of Rule 15c3-3.
    Finally, a broker-dealer that effects transactions in securities
futures products (``SFPs'') for customers \1\ also will have paperwork
burdens associated with the requirement in paragraph (o) of Rule 15c3-3
to make a record of each change in account type.\2\ More specifically,
a broker-dealer that changes the type of account in which a customer's
SFPs are held must create a record of each change in account type that
includes the name of the customer, the account number, the date the
broker-dealer received the customer's request to change the account
type, and the date the change in account type took place. As of
December 31, 2006, broker-dealers that were also registered as futures
commission merchants (``FCMs'') reported that they maintained
38,815,092 customer accounts. The staff estimates that 8% of these
customers may engage in SFP transactions (38,815,092 accounts x 8% =
3,105,207). Further, the staff estimates that 20% per year may change
account type. Thus, broker-dealers may be required to create this
record for up to 621,041 accounts (3,105,207 accounts x 20%). The staff
believes that it will take approximately 3 minutes to create each
record.\3\ Thus, the total annual burden associated with creating a
record of change of account type will be 31,052 hours (621,041 accounts
x (3min/60min)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Broker-dealers that do not engage in an SFP business with or
for customers are not affected by this section of Rule 15c3-3.
Broker-dealers that engage in an SFP business must also register
with the CFTC as a futures commission merchant (``FCM''). As of
January 31, 2007 there were 64 broker-dealers that were also
registered as FCMs.
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-3(o)(3)(i).
    \3\ In fact, the staff believes that most firms will have this
process automated. To the extent that no person need be involved in
the generation of this record, the burden will be very minimal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consequently, the staff estimates that the total annual burden
hours associated with Rule 15c3-3 would be approximately 71,156 hours
(39,950 hours + 121 hours + 33 hours + 31,052 hours).
    In addition, a broker-dealer that effects transactions in SFPs for
customers also will have an annualized cost burden associated with the
requirements in paragraph (o) of Rule 15c3-3 to (1) provide each
customer that plans to effect SFP transactions with a disclosure
document containing certain information,\4\ and (2) send each SFP
customer notification of any change of account type.\5\ Approximately
8% of the accounts held by broker-dealers that are also registered as
FCMs, or 3,105,207 accounts, may engage in SFP transactions. The staff
estimates that the cost of printing and sending each disclosure
document will be approximately $.12 per document sent.\6\ Thus, the
staff estimates that the cost of printing and sending disclosure
documents would be approximately $372,625 (3,105,207 accounts x $.12).
In addition, approximately 621,041 accounts (3,105,207 accounts x 20%)
may change account type per year requiring that broker-dealers provide
notification to those customers. The staff estimates that the cost of
sending this notification to customers will be about $74,525 (621,041
accounts x $.12). Consequently, the staff estimates that the total
annual cost associated with Rule 15c3-3 would be $447,150 ($372,625 +
$74,525).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-3(o)(2).
    \5\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-3(o)(3)(ii).
    \6\ Based on past conversations with industry representatives
regarding other rule changes as adjusted to account for inflation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Records required to be created and notices required to be filed
with the Commission pursuant to Rule 15c3-3 must be maintained in
accordance with Rule 17a-4 (17 CFR 240.17a-4). The collection of
information is mandatory and the information required to be provided to
the Commission pursuant to these Rules are deemed confidential,
notwithstanding any other provision of law under Section 24(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78x(b)) and Section
552(b)(3)(B) of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3)(B)).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    Comments should be directed to (i) Desk Officer for the Securities
and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or by sending an e-mail to: Alexander--
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an e-
mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted within 30
days of this notice.

    Dated: November 19, 2007.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-23111 Filed 11-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 114 (Friday, June 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 33917]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13857]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9912-27-OARM]

National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and
Technology: Notice of Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Charter Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has determined that, in accordance with the provisions of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. 2, the National
Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology (NACEPT) is a
necessary committee which is in the public interest. Accordingly,
NACEPT will be renewed for an additional two-year period. The purpose
of NACEPT is to provide advice and recommendations to the Administrator
of EPA on a broad range of environmental policy, technology and
management issues. Inquiries may be directed to Mark Joyce, U.S. EPA,
(Mail Code 1601M), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: May 22, 2014.
Craig E. Hooks,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Administration and Resources
Management.
[FR Doc. 2014-13857 Filed 6-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

Issued by the Department of Transportation on March 21, 2007

   NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2007-27637

________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Application of JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION (JETBLUE) filed 3/15/07 for:

XX  Exemption for two years under 49 U.S.C. 40109 to provide the
following service:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail
between Boston, Massachusetts and Aruba.

Applicant rep: Jonathan B. Hill<PHONE_NUMBER>     DOT Analyst: Thuy
H. Cooper<PHONE_NUMBER>

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX  Granted (subject to conditions; see remarks below)

The above action was effective when taken: March 21, 2007, through March
21, 2009, or until 90 days after final Department action on JetBlue’s
application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity in the
instant docket, whichever occurs earlier.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

XX  The authority granted is consistent with the aviation agreement
between the United States and  Aruba.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated: XX  Holder’s
certificates of public convenience and necessity

	   XX  Standard Exemption Conditions (attached)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------

Remarks: We acted on this application without awaiting expiration of the
15-day answer period with the consent of all parties served with the
application.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department's regulations, we found the applicant qualified to provide
the exemption services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted, we denied all requests in the referenced
Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority granted in this
Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

U.S. Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the U.S. carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2)  Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3)  Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4)  Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration, the Transportation Security Administration, and with all
applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning security, including,
but not limited to, 49 CFR Part 1544.  To assure compliance with all
applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning security, the holder
shall, before commencing any new service (including charter flights) to
or from a foreign airport, contact its International Principal Security
Inspector (IPSI) to advise the IPSI of its plans and to find out whether
the Transportation Security Administration has determined that security
is adequate to allow such airport(s) to be served;

(7)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations
of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the
United States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.

											        11/2006