[Federal Register: April 6, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 66)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 17344-17345]
[DOCID:fr06ap06-3]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 279

[Release No. IA-2504]

Technical Amendments to Form ADV, Form ADV-W, Form ADV-H, Form
ADV-E

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or
``SEC'') is making technical amendments to Form ADV under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (``Advisers Act''). Form ADV is the
form advisers use to register with the Commission and the state
securities regulatory authorities. The Commission is also making
technical amendments to Form ADV-W, Form ADV-H, and Form ADV-E.

DATES: Effective Date: April 7, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vivien Liu, Senior Counsel, or
Jennifer L. Sawin, Assistant Director, at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Office of Investment Adviser Regulation, Division of

Investment Management, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-5041.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 203A(a) of the Advisers Act,
an adviser that is ``regulated or required to be regulated'' as an
investment adviser in the state in which it maintains its principal
office and place of business is prohibited from registering with the
Commission unless the adviser has $25 million of assets under
management, or advises an investment company registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940.\1\ All investment advisers--regardless
of the amount of assets they manage or whether they advise a registered
investment company--may register with the Commission if their principal
office and place of business is located in a state that has not enacted
a statute regulating advisers.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 80b-3a. The Commission has adopted various
additional exemptions from the prohibition on SEC registration. See
rule 203A-2 (17 CFR 275.203A-2).
    \2\ Rules Implementing Amendments to the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940, Investment Advisers Act Release No. 1633 (May 15, 1997) (62
FR 28112 (May 22, 1997)). Section 202(a)(19) (15 U.S.C. 80b-
2(a)(19)) of the Advisers Act defines ``state'' to include, in
addition to the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico,
the Virgin Islands, or any other possession of the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Recently the U.S. Virgin Islands enacted a statute regulating
investment advisers.\3\ As a consequence, an investment adviser with a
principal office and place of business in the Virgin Islands may not
register with the Commission unless it has at least $25 million of
assets under management, advises a registered investment company or is
eligible to rely on one of the exemptions from the prohibition on
registration contained in rule 203A-2.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 9 V.I. Code Ann. Sec. Sec.  601-672 (2004).
    \4\ Absent eligibility for Commission registration, these
advisers are subject to the registration provisions of U.S. Virgin
Islands law. In addition, advisers ineligible for Commission
registration that have their principal office and place of business
in the U.S. Virgin Islands may be required to register in one or
more other states, if they have six or more clients that are
residents of that state or have a place of business in that state.
See Advisers Act section 222(d)(15 U.S.C. 80b-18a(d)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is making technical amendments to Part 1A, Item 2 of
Form ADV, as well as to Form ADV-W and Form ADV-E, to reflect the
addition of the U.S. Virgin Islands to the group of states with
investment adviser statutes.\5\ Form ADV-W is the form advisers use to
withdraw from registration, and Form ADV-E is the cover page used to
submit independent public accountants' certification of surprise
examinations under the adviser custody rule, rule 206(4)-2.\6\ In
addition, the Commission is making amendments to Form ADV-H, the form
advisers use to apply for a hardship exemption from the requirement to
register with the Commission electronically, and to Item 16 of the
General Instructions to Form ADV, to update the Commission's mailing
address.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 279.1 (Form ADV); 17 CFR 279.2 (Form ADV-W); 17 CFR
279.8 (Form ADV-E). These changes include not only removing
reference to the Virgin Islands from Item 2.A(2) in Part 1A of Form
ADV (concerning an adviser's eligibility to register with the
Commission), but also adding check-boxes for the Virgin Islands to
Item 2.B. in Part 1A of Form ADV (concerning state notice filings
for SEC-registered investment advisers), and paragraph (b) of the
Status section of Form ADV-W (concerning withdrawals from state
investment adviser registration). These check-boxes will appear on
the paper version of the Forms, but will not be available for use by
electronic filers on IARD until the IARD system is reprogrammed to
support the Virgin Islands' participation in the system as a state
securities administrator.
    \6\ 17 CFR 275.206(4)-2. The Commission is also updating Form
ADV-E's cross-references to the rule to reflect the recent
amendments to the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Certain Findings

    Under the Administrative Procedure Act (``APA''), notice of
proposed rulemaking is not required when the agency, for good cause,
finds ``that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' \7\ The Commission
is making technical amendments to Part 1A, Item 2 of Form ADV, Form
ADV-W and Form ADV-E in light of new legislation in the U.S. Virgin
Islands and to update out-of-date cross-references, and making
technical amendments to Form ADV-H and the General Instructions to Form
ADV to update the Commission's mailing address. The Commission,
therefore, finds that publishing the amendments for comment is
unnecessary.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
    \8\ For similar reasons, the amendments do not require analysis
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act or analysis of major rule
status under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
See 5 U.S.C. 601(2) (for purposes of Regulatory Flexibility Act
analyses, the term ``rule'' means any rule for which the agency
publishes a general notice of proposed rulemaking); 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(C) (for purposes of Congressional review of agency
rulemaking, the term ``rule'' does not include any rule of agency
organization, procedure, or practice that does not substantially
affect the rights or obligations of non-agency parties).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Publication of a substantive rule not less than 30 days before its
effective date is required by the APA except as otherwise provided by
the agency for good cause.\9\ For the same reasons described above with
respect to notice and opportunity for comment, the Commission finds
that there is good cause for making these technical amendments
effective on April 7, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Consideration of Promotion of Efficiency, Competition, and Capital
Formation

    Section 202(c) of the Advisers Act requires the Commission, when
engaging in rulemaking that requires it to consider or determine
whether an action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
to consider, in addition to the protection of investors, whether the
action will promote efficiency,

competition, and capital formation.\10\ Because the amendments are
limited to technical amendments, we do not anticipate that any
competitive advantages or disadvantages would be created. We do not
expect the amendments, as technical amendments, to have an effect on
efficiency, or on capital formation or the capital markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 80b-2(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Statutory Authority

    We are adopting technical amendments to Form ADV (17 CFR 279.1)
under the authority set forth in section 19(a) of the Securities Act of
1933 (15 U.S.C. 77s(a)), sections 23(a) and 28(e)(2) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78w(a) and 78bb(e)(2)), section 319(a)
of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (15 U.S.C. 77sss(a)), section 38(a)
of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 78a-37(a)), and
sections 203(c)(1), 204, and 211(a) of the Investment Advisers Act of
1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-3(c)(1), 80b-4, and 80b-11(a)).
    We are adopting technical amendments to Form ADV-W (17 CFR 279.2)
under the authority set forth in sections 203(h), 204, and 211(a) of
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-3(h), 80b-4, and
80b-11(a)).
    We are adopting technical amendments to Form ADV-H (17 CFR 279.3)
under the authority set forth in sections 203(c)(1), 204, and 211(a) of
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-3(c)(1), 80b-4, and
80b-11(a)).
    We are adopting technical amendments to Form ADV-E (17 CFR 279.8)
under the authority set forth in sections 204, 206, and 211(a) of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-4, 80b-6, and 80b-
11(a)).

Text of Form Amendments

List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 279

    Reporting and recordkeeping requirements; Securities.

0
Accordingly, 17 CFR part 279 is amended as follows:

PART 279--FORMS PRESCRIBED UNDER THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF
1940

0
1. The authority citation for part 279 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: The Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. 80b-1,
et seq.

0
2. Form ADV (referenced in Sec.  279.1) is amended by:
0
a. Removing ``the U.S. Virgin Islands or'' from Part 1A, Item 2 A.(2);
and
0
b. Inserting ``[ballot] VI'' in the table of Part 1A, Item 2 B before
``[ballot] VA''.
0
3. Form ADV General Instruction 16 (referenced in Sec.  279.1) is
amended by revising ``450 5th Street, NW., Mail Stop A-2, Washington,
DC 20549'' to read ``100 F Street, NE., Mail Stop 0-25, Washington, DC
20549.''

    Note: Form ADV does not and this amendment will not appear in
the Code of Federal Registrations.

0
4. Form ADV-W (referenced in Sec.  279.2) is amended by inserting
``[ballot] VI'' before ``[ballot] VA'' in paragraph (b) of the Status
section.

    Note: Form ADV-W does not and this amendment will not appear in
the Code of Federal Registrations.

0
5. Form ADV-H (referenced in Sec.  279.3) is amended in Item 4 by
revising ``Office of Registrations and Examinations, Mail Stop 0-25,
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549'' to read ``Branch of
Registrations and Examinations, Mail Stop 0-25, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549''.

    Note: Form ADV-H does not and this amendment will not appear in
the Code of Federal Registrations.

0
6. Form ADV-E (referenced in Sec.  279.8) is amended by:
0
a. In 2, revising the table to read:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AL                     AK                     AZ                     AR                     CA
CO                     CT                     DE                     DC                     FL
GA                     HI                     ID                     IL                     IN
IA                     KS                     KY                     LA                     ME
MO                     MT                     NE                     NV                     NH
JN                     NM                     NY                     NC                     ND
OH                     OK                     OR                     PA                     RI
SC                     SD                     TN                     TX                     UT
VT                     VI                     VA                     WA                     WV
WI                     WY                     Puerto Rico            Other (specify):       ....................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0
b. In Instructions 2 and 3, and in the paragraph with the heading
``SEC's Collection of Information,'' revising references to ``rule
206(4)-2(a)(5)'' to read ``rule 206(4)-2(a)(3)(ii)(B)''; and
0
c. In the paragraph with the heading ``SEC's Collection of
Information,'' revising ``17 CFR 275.206(4)-2(a)(5)'' to read ``17 CFR
275.206(4)-2(a)(3)(ii)(B)''.

    Note: Form ADV-E does not and this amendment will not appear in
the Code of Federal Registrations.

    Dated: March 30, 2006.
    By the Commission.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-3322 Filed 4-5-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


U.S. Department 										55 Broadway
of Transportation										Cambridge, MA 02142

Research and
Innovative Technology
Administration

Volpe National Transportation Systems Center

June 16, 2011
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:	Ex parte meeting with Allison Transmission
FROM:		Coralie Cooper, Volpe
TO:		Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0079
This memorandum documents a meeting held on May 19, 2011 between Allison Transmission, EPA, and DOT regarding the proposed fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas standards for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles and engines for model years 2014-2018.  The attendees included:
Allison: Debbie Gordon, Kevin Rogers, Curt Vapor, George Pelton, Mark Janson, Bob Leopold,  Robert Meyers
EPA: Cle Jackson, Angela Cullen, Houshan Zhang, Allen Duncan, Bill Courtis, Peter Smith, James Sanchez
DOT: Coralie Cooper, Maurice Hicks
The following topics were discussed during the meeting:
Vehicle testing:  Allison staff stated the effect of the transmission on GHG emissions and fuel consumption cannot be accurately assessed in isolation, but only with the entire vehicle system.  Thus, Allison stated, the agencies should not finalize a protocol for testing transmissions at this time.  Allison recommended excluding transmissions as proposed in the NPRM.

Drive cycle for certification testing:  Allison staff noted that numerous comments were submitted on the proposed drive cycles, and especially for vocational vehicles, which said the cycles do not reflect real world operation.   Commenters were generally in agreement that steady-state cruise is over-represented in the drive cycles and transient operation under-represented.    Allison suggested a number of improvements to the drive cycles, including:
   * weight the cycles on percent time and not distance  -  time weighting needs to be made clear in regulations since conflicting language exists in the NPRM.  Likewise, PTO operation needs to be measured by time;
   * include grade in the drive cycles since these impact emissions and fuel consumption.  If grade cannot be added, then the percent time spent in transient mode should be increased;
   * include vocational sub-group weightings (there is currently only one vocational vehicle test cycle weighting as the NPRM is written).  Adding sub group weightings would more accurately reflect the vehicles in the fleet today;
   * do not include straight line acceleration in the GEM drive cycles since straight line acceleration does not reflect normal acceleration curves.  They added that straight line acceleration is biased toward automatic manual transmissions;
   * Use a European-type approach for drive cycles, which include more transient operation.
Hybrid Testing/Innovative Technology Program:  in order to avoid gaming the certification process, Allison stated that a common vehicle configuration which is actually built by OEMs needs to be defined for the "A" vehicle.  They added the "B" vehicle needs to be the exact vehicle that goes into production.  In addition, the vehicle system needs to be defined:
      * Engine, engine calibration, and after-treatment system;
      * Automatic transmission system must replicate the actual, integrated vehicle system;
      * Transmissions system components must be defined and required for testing;
      * Hybrid system components, such as energy storage, electrical system/accessory loads need to be defined and included in testing.
The agencies agreed to consider the above requests in the development of the final rule.


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 170 (Friday, August 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44618-44620]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18914]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP18-524-000]

D'Lo Gas Storage, LLC; Notice of Intent to Prepare an
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed D'Lo Natural Gas Storage
Project Amendment, and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of the D'Lo Natural Gas Storage
Project Amendment involving construction and operation of facilities by
D'Lo Gas

Storage, LLC (DGS) in Simpson and Rankin Counties, Mississippi. The
Commission will use this EA in its decision-making process to determine
whether the project is in the public convenience and necessity.
    This notice announces the opening of the scoping process the
Commission will use to gather input from the public and interested
agencies about issues regarding the project. The National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) requires the Commission to take into account the
environmental impacts that could result from its action whenever it
considers the issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity. NEPA also requires the Commission to discover concerns the
public may have about proposals. This process is referred to as
scoping. The main goal of the scoping process is to focus the analysis
in the EA on the important environmental issues. By this notice, the
Commission requests public comments on the scope of the issues to
address in the EA. To ensure that your comments are timely and properly
recorded, please submit your comments so that the Commission receives
them in Washington, DC on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on September
26, 2018.
    You can make a difference by submitting your specific comments or
concerns about the project. Your comments should focus on the potential
environmental effects, reasonable alternatives, and measures to avoid
or lessen environmental impacts. Your input will help the Commission
staff determine what issues they need to evaluate in the EA. Commission
staff will consider and address all filed comments during the
preparation of the EA.
    If you sent comments on this project to the Commission before the
opening of this docket on July 13, 2018, you will need to file those
comments in Docket No. CP18-524-000 to ensure they are considered as
part of this proceeding.
    This notice is being sent to the Commission's current environmental
mailing list for this project. State and local government
representatives should notify their constituents of this proposed
project and encourage them to comment on their areas of concern.
    If you are a landowner receiving this notice, a pipeline company
representative may contact you about the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the proposed facilities. The company
would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable easement agreement. You
are not required to enter into an agreement. However, if the Commission
approves the project, that approval conveys with it the right of
eminent domain. Therefore, if you and the company do not reach an
easement agreement, the pipeline company could initiate condemnation
proceedings in court. In such instances, compensation would be
determined by a judge in accordance with state law.
    DGS provided landowners with a fact sheet prepared by the FERC
entitled An Interstate Natural Gas Facility On My Land? What Do I Need
To Know? This fact sheet addresses a number of typically asked
questions, including the use of eminent domain and how to participate
in the Commission's proceedings. It is also available for viewing on
the FERC website (www.ferc.gov).

Public Participation

    For your convenience, there are three methods you can use to submit
your comments to the Commission. The Commission encourages electronic
filing of comments and has staff available to assist you at (866) 208-
3676 or [email protected]. Please carefully follow these
instructions so that your comments are properly recorded.
    (1) You can file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature, which is located on the Commission's website (www.ferc.gov)
under the link to Documents and Filings. Using eComment is an easy
method for submitting brief, text-only comments on a project;
    (2) You can file your comments electronically by using the eFiling
feature, which is located on the Commission's website (www.ferc.gov)
under the link to Documents and Filings. With eFiling, you can provide
comments in a variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your
submission. New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking
on ``eRegister.'' You will be asked to select the type of filing you
are making; a comment on a particular project is considered a Comment
on a Filing; or
    (3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the following address. Be sure to reference the project docket number
(CP18-524-000) with your submission:
    Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.

Summary of the Proposed Project

    The FERC issued a Certificate for the original D'Lo Gas Storage
Project on September 6, 2012 in Docket No. CP12-39-000. DGS proposes to
amend the originally certificated project design, as described below.
The D'Lo Gas Storage Project would provide about 1.2 billion cubic feet
(Bcf) per day of withdrawal and 0.59 Bcf per day of injection capacity.
According to DGS, its project would help meet the growing demand for
firm and interruptible high deliverability natural gas storage services
to support deliveries of natural gas to widely variable electric power
generation loads, and to provide services to growing local distribution
companies and other markets that require highly reliable natural gas
service in Mississippi, and the Northeastern, mid-Atlantic,
Southeastern, and Florida regions.
    DGS is proposing the following amendments to the originally
certificated project design:
     Elimination of the Gulf South Interconnect Lateral and
Gulf South Meter Station facilities; and
     relocation of Primary Source Water Wells #2 and #4 and
Primary Brine Disposal Wells #2 and #4 approximately 0.4 mile south of
their originally proposed locations.
    The revised scope of the total project includes:
     The solution mining of three salt dome caverns with a
designed total working gas volume of 8.0 Bcf per cavern;
     a new solution mining facility site having injection and
withdrawal capacity of 4,000-8,000 gallons per minute (gpm);
     a new compressor station with four 8,000 horsepower (hp)
and one 4,735 hp Caterpillar gas engine driven compressors, totaling
36,735 hp;
     the drilling and completion of four primary and three
secondary source water wells, each having a total production capability
of 1,000 gpm;
     the drilling and completion of four primary and one
secondary brine disposal wells, each having injection capability of
1,000 gpm;
     4.0 miles of 20-inch-diameter source water pipelines;
     4.0 miles of 20-inch-diameter brine disposal pipelines;
     0.2 mile of 24-inch-diameter natural gas pipeline from the
compressor and solution mining facility sites to Cavern Well #3;
     0.4 mile of 30-inch-diameter natural gas pipeline with an
interconnect and meter station to Boardwalk Pipeline Company;
     0.8 mile of 24-inch-diameter natural gas pipeline with an
interconnect and meter station to Southern Natural Gas Pipeline
Company;
     3.2 miles of 30-inch-diameter natural gas pipeline with an

interconnect and meter station to Kinder Morgan Midcontinent Express
Pipeline;
     a new 12-inch-diameter tap and interconnect and meter
station to Southcross Energy; and
     the widening and improvement of 3.5 miles of existing
access roads, and construction of 0.8 mile of new access roads for
construction, operations, and maintenance of the proposed facilities.
    The general location of the project facilities is shown in appendix
1.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The appendices referenced in this notice will not appear in
the Federal Register. Copies of appendices were sent to all those
receiving this notice in the mail and are available at www.ferc.gov
using the link called ``eLibrary'' or from the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, or call
(202) 502-8371. For instructions on connecting to eLibrary, refer to
the last page of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Land Requirements for Construction

    Construction of the proposed facilities would disturb about 160.3
acres of land for the aboveground facilities and pipelines. Following
construction, DGS would maintain about 113.8 acres for permanent
operation of the project's facilities; the remaining acreage would be
restored and revert to former uses. The proposed changes presented
above would reduce surface impacts from the original project by
approximately 14.1 acres. DGS owns and/or controls all areas of the
project that would be permanently impacted.

The EA Process

    The EA will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of the
construction and operation of the proposed project under these general
headings:
     Geology and soils;
     land use;
     water resources, fisheries, and wetlands;
     cultural resources;
     vegetation and wildlife;
     air quality and noise;
     endangered and threatened species;
     public safety; and
     cumulative impacts
    Commission staff will also evaluate reasonable alternatives to the
proposed project or portions of the project, and make recommendations
on how to lessen or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
    The EA will present Commission staffs' independent analysis of the
issues. The EA will be available in the public record through
eLibrary.\2\ Commission staff will consider and address all comments on
the EA before making recommendations to the Commission. To ensure
Commission staff have the opportunity to address your comments, please
carefully follow the instructions in the Public Participation section,
beginning on page 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ For instructions on connecting to eLibrary, refer to the
last page of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With this notice, the Commission is asking agencies with
jurisdiction by law and/or special expertise with respect to the
environmental issues of this project to formally cooperate in the
preparation of the EA.\3\ Agencies that would like to request
cooperating agency status should follow the instructions for filing
comments provided under the Public Participation section of this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Council on Environmental Quality regulations addressing
cooperating agency responsibilities are at Title 40, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 1501.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consultation Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act

    In accordance with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
implementing regulations for section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, the Commission is are using this notice to initiate
consultation with the applicable State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO), and to solicit their views and those of other government
agencies, interested Indian tribes, and the public on the project's
potential effects on historic properties.\4\ Commission staff will
define the project-specific Area of Potential Effects (APE) in
consultation with the SHPO as the project develops. On natural gas
facility projects, the APE at a minimum encompasses all areas subject
to ground disturbance (examples include construction right-of-way,
contractor/pipe storage yards, compressor stations, and access roads).
The EA for this project will document findings on the impacts on
historic properties and summarize the status of consultations under
section 106.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's regulations
are at Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 800. Those
regulations define historic properties as any prehistoric or
historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in
or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Environmental Mailing List

    The environmental mailing list includes federal, state, and local
government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest groups; Native American Tribes; other
interested parties; and local libraries and newspapers. This list also
includes all affected landowners (as defined in the Commission's
regulations) who are potential right-of-way grantors, whose property
may be used temporarily for project purposes, or who own homes within
certain distances of aboveground facilities, and anyone who submits
comments on the project. Commission staff will update the environmental
mailing list as the analysis proceeds to ensure that information
related to this environmental review is sent to all individuals,
organizations, and government entities interested in and/or potentially
affected by the proposed project.
    As stated above, the EA will be available in the public record
through the Commission's eLibrary, under the Docket Number CP18-524-
000.

Additional Information

    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC website at www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link. Click on the
eLibrary link, click on General Search and enter the docket number in
the Docket Number field, excluding the last three digits (i.e., CP18-
524). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
[email protected] or<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY, contact (202)
502-8659. The eLibrary link also provides access to the texts of all
formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders, notices, and
rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.
    Finally, public sessions or site visits will be posted on the
Commission's calendar located at www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along with other related information.

    Dated: August 27, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-18914 Filed 8-30-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P