42026 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 136 / Wednesday, July 16, 2003 / Notices E. Safety Determination 1. U. S. population. Using the exposure assumptions described above, BASF has estimated that chronic dietary aggregate exposure to chlorfenapyr for the U. S. population was 0.002615 mg/ kg bwt/ day or 8.7% of the chronic RfD of 0.03 mg/ kg bwt/ day. Other than children less than 12 years of age, hispanics are the U. S. population subgroup with the highest chronic exposure of 0.003403 mg/ kg bwt/ day, or 11.3% of the RfD. EPA has no concerns about exposure that are less than 100% of the RfD as the RfD represents the level at or below which daily aggregate dietary exposure over a lifetime will not pose appreciable risks to human health. It is therefore, safe to conclude that there is reasonable certainty that no harm to the overall U. S. population will result from chronic exposure to chlorfenapyr residues. 2. Infants and children. Using the exposure assumption described above, BASF has estimated that the chronic dietary aggregate exposure to chlorfenapyr for children 1   6 years of age was 0.005936 mg/ kg bwt/ day, or 19.8% of the chronic RfD of 0.03 mg/ kg bwt/ day. Children 1   6 years of age were the sub population that utilized the largest portion of the chronic RfD. It is therefore, safe to conclude that there is reasonable certainty that no harm to infants and children will result from chronic exposure to chlorfenapyr residues.

F. International Tolerances No Codex or Canadian tolerances/ limits for residues in any food presently exist for chlorfenapyr. In Mexico there is a MRL of 0.3 ppm for cottonseed. [ FR Doc. 03   17900 Filed 7   15   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ OPP   2003   0235; FRL   7317   4]

Gellan Gum; Notice of Filing a Pesticide Petition to Establish a Tolerance for a Certain Pesticide Chemical in or on Food AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice announces the initial filing of a pesticide petition proposing the establishment of regulations for residues of a certain pesticide chemical in or on various food commodities. DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification ( ID) number OPP   2003   0235, must be received on or before August 15, 2003. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/ courier. Follow the detailed instructions as provided in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathryn Boyle, Registration Division ( 7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001; telephone number: ( 703) 305   6304; e mail address: boyle. kathryn@ epa. gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:   Crop production ( NAICS code 111)   Animal production ( NAICS code 112)   Food manufacturing ( NAICS code 311)   Pesticide manufacturing ( NAICS code 32532) This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be affected. The North American Industrial Classification System ( NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?

1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this action under docket ID number OPP   2003   0235. The official public docket consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other information related to this action. Although a part of the official docket, the public docket does not include Confidential Business Information ( CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public docket is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch ( PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall # 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket telephone number is ( 703) 305   5805. 2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the `` Federal Register'' listings at http:// www. epa. gov/ fedrgstr/. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA Dockets at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket/ to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I. B. 1. Once in the system, select `` search,'' then key in the appropriate docket ID number. Certain types of information will not be placed in EPA's Dockets. Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute, which is not included in the official public docket, will not be available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material will not be placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in printed, paper form in the official public docket. To the extent feasible, publicly available docket materials will be made available in EPA's electronic public docket. When a document is selected from the index list in EPA Dockets, the system will identify whether the document is available for viewing in EPA's electronic public docket. Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I. B. EPA intends to work towards providing electronic access to all of the publicly available docket materials through EPA's electronic public docket. For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 17: 58 Jul 15, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 16JYN1. SGM 16JYN1 42027 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 136 / Wednesday, July 16, 2003 / Notices restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket. Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public docket. Public comments that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public docket. Where practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph will be placed in EPA's electronic public docket along with a brief description written by the docket staff.

C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?

You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/ courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate docket ID number in the subject line on the first page of your comment. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked `` late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late comments. If you wish to submit CBI or information that is otherwise protected by statute, please follow the instructions in Unit I. D. Do not use EPA Dockets or e mail to submit CBI or information protected by statute. 1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as prescribed in this unit, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other contact information in the body of your comment. Also include this contact information on the outside of any disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying the disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further information on the substance of your comment. EPA's policy is that EPA will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to submit comments to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket, and follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once in the system, select `` search,'' and then key in docket ID number OPP   2003   0235. The system is an `` anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity, e mail address, or other contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. ii. E mail. Comments may be sent by e mail to opp docket@ epa. gov, Attention: Docket ID Number OPP   2003   0235. In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e mail system is not an `` anonymous access'' system. If you send an e mail comment directly to the docket without going through EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e mail system automatically captures your e mail address. E mail addresses that are automatically captured by EPA's e mail system are included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM that you mail to the mailing address identified in Unit I. C. 2. These electronic submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect or ASCII file format. Avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption. 2. By mail. Send your comments to: Public Information and Records Integrity Branch ( PIRIB) ( 7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs ( OPP), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001, Attention: Docket ID Number OPP   2003   0235. 3. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver your comments to: Public Information and Records Integrity Branch ( PIRIB), Office of Pesticide Programs ( OPP), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal Mall # 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA, Attention: Docket ID Number OPP   2003   0235. Such deliveries are only accepted during the docket's normal hours of operation as identified in Unit I. B. 1.

D. How Should I Submit CBI to the Agency? Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI electronically through EPA's electronic public docket or by e mail. You may claim information that you submit to EPA as CBI by marking any part or all of that information as CBI ( if you submit CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that is CBI). Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes any information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket and EPA's electronic public docket. If you submit the copy that does not contain CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM clearly that it does not contain CBI. Information not marked as CBI will be included in the public docket and EPA's electronic public docket without prior notice. If you have any questions about CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI, please consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

E. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your comments: 1. Explain your views as clearly as possible. 2. Describe any assumptions that you used. 3. Provide copies of any technical information and/ or data you used that support your views. 4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you arrived at the estimate that you provide. 5. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns. 6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline in this notice. 7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal Register citation.

II. What Action is the Agency Taking?

EPA has received a pesticide petition as follows proposing the establishment and/ or amendment of regulations for residues of a certain pesticide chemical in or on various food commodities under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ( FFDCA), 21 U. S. C. 346a. EPA has determined that this petition contains data or information regarding the elements set forth in FFDCA section 408( d)( 2); however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 17: 58 Jul 15, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 16JYN1. SGM 16JYN1 42028 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 136 / Wednesday, July 16, 2003 / Notices this time or whether the data support granting of the petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the petition.

List of Subjects Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives, Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: July 7, 2003. Peter Caulkins, Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

Summary of Petition The petitioner's summary of the pesticide petition is printed below as required by FFDCA section 408( d)( 3). The summary of the petition was prepared by the petitioner and represents the view of the petitioner. The summary may have been edited by EPA if the terminology used was unclear, the summary contained extraneous material, or the summary unintentionally made the reader conclude that the findings reflected EPA's position and not the position of the petitioner. The petition summary announces the availability of a description of the analytical methods available to EPA for the detection and measurement of the pesticide chemical residues or an explanation of why no such method is needed.

CP Kelco PP 3E6567 EPA has received a pesticide petition ( PP 3E6567) from CP Kelco, 8355 Aero Drive, San Diego, CA 92123, proposing pursuant to section 408( d) of the FFDCA, 21 U. S. C. 346a( d), to amend 40 CFR part 180 to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for gellan gum ( CAS Reg. No. 71010   52   1) in or on all raw agricultural commodities ( RAC) when used as a sticker/ thickener in seed treatment and pesticide formulations. EPA has determined that the petition contains data or information regarding the elements set forth in section 408( d)( 2) of the FFDCA; however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether the data support granting of the petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the petition.

A. Residue Chemistry 1. Plant metabolism. As a polysaccharide polymer, gellan gum is non systemic and therefore no metabolism of gellan gum in raw agricultural commodities or processed commodities is expected. 2. Analytical method. Analytical methods for determination of the polysaccharide polymer, gellan gum are available. Gellan gum is determined by the dissolution of gellan gum containing gels by heating and cooling in the presence of a dilute sequestrant solution ( e. g. 0.1% w/ v sodium hexametaphosphate). The gellan gum assay is based upon the presence of the 6 deoxyhexose rhamnose which can be determined using the cysteine sulfuric acid procedure, originally developed by Dische and Shettles and modified by Graham. 3. Magnitude of residues. Gellan gum is applied as a minor component of pesticidal formulations. Gellan gum degrades into simple non toxic sugars and their salts.

B. Toxicological Profile 1. Acute toxicity. The acute toxicity of gellan gum was studied using male and female rats via the oral and inhalation routes. In the acute oral toxicity study, the lethal dose ( LD) 50 for both males and females was established at > 5,000 milligrams/ kilogram body weight ( mg/ kg bwt). For the acute inhalation toxicity study, the LD50 for both males and females was established at > 5.09 milligrams/ Liter ( mg/ L). Gellan gum is practically non toxic to rats when administered as a single large dose ( 5 g/ kg bwt) in diet or via gavage. 2. Genotoxicity. Gellan gum was shown to be non genotoxic in a battery of standard short term tests. The Ames test, involving S. typhimurium at 10, 30, 100, 300, and 1,000 µ g/ plate resulted in a negative response. A deoxyribonucleic acid ( DNA) repair test using the rat hepatocyte as a test subject at 3, 5, 10, and 20 milligrams/ liter ( mg/ L) resulted in a negative response. For the V   79/ hypoxanthine guanine phophoribosyl transferase/( HGPRT) study, involving the Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts, doses at 3, 5, 10, and 20 mg/ mL resulted in a negative response. 3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity. Groups of 26 male and female CD ( Sprague Dawley) rats were administered gellan gum in their diets at doses of 0, 2.5, 3.8, or 5.0%. Males were treated for 70 days prior to mating and for 3 weeks after mating. Females were treated for 14 days prior to mating and throughout mating, gestation, and lactation. Selection was made for the pups ( F1) of this mating and they were allowed to mature and were mated to form the F2 generation. There was no treatment related effect of mating or fertility index, conception rate, length of gestation, length or parturition, number of live pups, number of dead pups, postimplantation loss index, survival index on day 4, 7, 14, or 21 or lactation index for any of the generations. For teratology studies, gellan gum was fed to groups of 25 pregnant female Sprague Dawley rats at dietary levels of 0, 2.5, 3.8, or 5.0% during days 6   15 of gestation. Gellan gum has no fetotoxic or teratogenic effects on rats when ingested in the diet at levels up to 5.0%. In the reproduction and teratogenic studies in rats in which gellan gum was given at doses up to 50 g/ kg in the diet, there was no evidence of interference with the reproductive process, and no embryotoxic or developmental effects were observed. 4. Subchronic toxicity. For short term studies, male and female Sprague Dawley rats ( 20/ sex/ group) were fed dietary levels of gellan gum ranging from 0   6% for 13 weeks. Although the animals on this study experienced symptoms of a sialodacryoadenitis viral infection, all animals survived treatment and there were no adverse effects associated with the feeding of gellan gum at levels up to 60 gram/ kilogram ( g/ kg). Also, prepubertal rhesus monkeys ( 2/ sex/ group) were dosed by oral gavage with gellan gum at levels of 0, 1, 2, or 3 g/ kg/ day for 28 days. There were no overt signs of toxicity reported at levels up to 50 g/ kg in the diet. 5. Chronic toxicity. Groups of 50 male and female Swiss Crl mice were fed gellan gum admixed in the diet at 0, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0% for 96 and 98 weeks for males and females, respectively. All animals were examined twice daily for mortality and morbidity. Physical examination for the presence of palpable masses was initiated on a weekly basis starting in week 26. Body weights and food consumption were measured for 7   day periods on a weekly basis for the first 26 weeks of treatment and every 2 weeks thereafter. At necropsy, a complete gross pathological examination was performed on the animals from the control and 3.0% groups. Only the liver, kidneys, ovaries, testes, adrenals, pituitary, lungs, and heart were examined for animals of the 1.0 and 2.0% groups. There were no effects attributable to the feeding of gellan gum on either body weight gain or food consumption. There were no neoplastic or non neoplastic changes which were associated with the feeding of gellan gum. For the rat, groups of 50 F1 generation Sprague Dawley rats of each sex were exposed to gellan gum in utero and continued on gellan gum diets for approximately 104 weeks. The dietary levels of gellan gum were 0, 2.5, 3.8, and 5.0%. The rats were observed daily for VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 17: 58 Jul 15, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 16JYN1. SGM 16JYN1 42029 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 136 / Wednesday, July 16, 2003 / Notices the first 4 weeks of treatment and weekly thereafter for clinical signs of toxicity. Individual bodyweights and food consumption were measured on a weekly basis for the first 26 weeks of treatment and every 2 weeks thereafter. Fundoscopic and biomicroscopic examinations were conducted on the control and 5% groups during weeks 1, 13, 26, 52, 78, and 103. Clinical chemistry and haematological samples were collected at weeks 13, 25, 39, and 51. After 104 weeks, ophthalmoscopic examinations, haematology, clinical chemistries and organ weight data revealed no changes which could be attributed to the feeding of gellan gum. Survival of male treated rats was poor when compared to controls whereas female treated rats exhibited better survival than their concurrent controls. Male rats, fed gellan gum at the 3.8 and 5.0% dietary levels, exhibited lower body weights after 76 weeks. The initial bodyweights were 5.2 and 3.4% lower than the control values for the 3.8 and 5.0% dietary levels, respectively. It was concluded that in spite of the initial body weight deficit, the growth pattern for these treated groups was identical to that of the control. In addition, this effect was not seen in either the females or any other species tested. There is no basis to suggest that the lower body weights, observed in the male rats, are indicative of toxicity. Organs and tissues as those listed in the mouse study were examined for histopathological changes at study termination. There were no neoplastic or non neoplastic changes that could be associated with the feeding of gellan gum. The authors concluded that gellan gum is non carcinogenic to Sprague Dawley rats. For chronic toxicity study on dogs, diets containing 0, 3, 4.5, and 6% gellan gum were fed to groups of 5 Beagle dogs per sex for a period of 52 weeks. The dogs were observed daily for clinical signs of toxicity and were measured for body weights and food consumption. Ophthalmoscopic examinations were performed during pretreatment and after 12, 24, 29, and 51 weeks. Hematology and clinical chemistry were measured during pretreatment and after 6, 13, 25, 39, and 50 weeks. After 52 weeks all animals were killed and grossly examined. All animals survived treatment. Food intake was higher in the treated groups compared to the controls. There were no adverse effects associated with the feeding of gellan gum to beagle dogs for a period 1   year. 6. Animal metabolism. The adsorption, distribution, and excretion of gellan gum was studied using a dually radiolabeled ( 3H and 14C) preparation. The use of dual labeling allowed simultaneous quantitation of both polysaccharide and `` protein'' fractions of gellan gum. One male and one female Sprague Dawley rat were gavaged with single doses of the 3H/ 14C gellan gum ( ca. 960 mg/ kg; ca. 4 µ Ci). Expired air was collected 24 hours after dosing. Less than 0.55% of the given radioactivity was detected as 14C. Four male and three female Sprague Dawley rats were dosed with single gavage dose of 3H/ 14C   gellan gum ( ca. 870 mg/ kg; 2.9  4.1 µ Ci 14C; 0.7  0.9 µ Ci 3H). Urine and feces were collected for 7 days, at which time the animals were sacrificed and their tissues analyzed for residual radioactivity. Females excreted 86.8% and 1.9% of the given 14C in the feces and urine, respectively. Males excreted 86% of the dosed 14C in the feces and 3.3% in the urine. Females excreted 4.1% of the dosed 3H in their urine and 100.1% in their feces, while males excreted 3.6% of the total 3H in their urine and 99.6% in their feces. In all animals, the activities of 3H in tissues ( blood, brain, liver, kidney, lung, muscle, skin, heart, and carcass) were too low to be quantitated accurately. Tissue and carcass radioactivity for 14C averaged 3.8% of dose for male rats and 3.0% of dose for female rats. A male and four female Sprague Dawley rats were gavaged with about 1 g/ kg of radiolabeled gellan gum and blood samples collected from the tail vein at different time intervals over a 7   day period. Data were reported as 14C dmp/ mL blood ( 3H dmp/ mL blood was not reported). The peak level of radioactivity, which amounted to about 0.4% of the administered radioactivity, occurred about 5 hours after dosing. Gellan gum was shown to be poorly absorbed and did not cause any deaths in rats which received a single large dose ( 5 g/ kg bwt) in the diet or by gavage. 7. Metabolite toxicology. Gellan gum is a polysaccharide polymer composed of D mannopyranose with Dglucopyranose and 6 deoxy Lmannopyronose calcium, potassium, and sodium salt. Gellan gum metabolizes into simple non toxic sugars and their salts. 8. Endocrine disruption. Gellan gum does not belong to a class of chemicals known or suspected of having adverse effects on the endocrine system. There is no evidence that gellan gum has any effect on endocrine function in developmental or reproduction studies. Furthermore, histological investigation of endocrine organs in chronic dog, rat, and mouse studies did not indicate that the endocrine system is targeted by gellan gum.

C. Aggregate Exposure 1. Dietary exposure. As a minor formulation component, there is no reasonable expectation that gellan gum will appear in diet. i. Food. Gellan gum is approved in the U. S. under 21 CFR 172.665 as a food additive, stabilizer, and thickener in batters, breadings, coatings, glazes, gravies, and sauces for meat and poultry products. As a minor formulation component, there is no reasonable expectation that gellan gum will appear in food from pesticide uses. ii. Drinking water. As a minor formulation component, there is no reasonable expectation that gellan gum will appear in water. 2. Non dietary exposure. The only non dietary exposure to gellan gum will be exposure through treating and handling of treated seeds and application of formulations containing gellan gum.

D. Cumulative Effects The potential for cumulative effects of gellan gum and other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity has also been considered. Gellan gum is a high molecular weight polysaccharide gum produced by a pure culture fermentation of a carbohydrate with Sphingomonas elodea. There is no reliable information to indicate that toxic effects produced by gellan gum would be cumulative with those of any other chemical including another pesticide. Therefore, CP Kelco believes it is appropriate to consider only the potential risks of gellan gum in an aggregate risk assessment.

E. Safety Determination 1. U. S. population. The occupational exposure to gellan gum in pesticide formulations during distribution and storage will be limited to: Workers involved in the transportation of gellan gum to customers; and those involved in the loading and off loading of the product containers from commercial carriers and during opening of drums containing gellan gum. However, the potential for worker exposure is expected to be well controlled and limited if worker safety procedures are routinely practiced. The potential opportunity for human exposure to gellan gum is expected to be limited to clean up activities during routine maintenance, or following an accidental spill or release. Exposures occurring during these activities would typically be minimized by the accommodations made in equipment design and VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 17: 58 Jul 15, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 16JYN1. SGM 16JYN1 42030 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 136 / Wednesday, July 16, 2003 / Notices employee work practices. As long as the recommended practices for worker protection during use are respected, the risk of worker exposure to gellan gum in an occupational setting is expected to be of minimal significance. 2. Infants and children. The exposure to gellan gum in pesticide formulations is limited to formulators and applicators. Dietary exposure to infants and children does not differ from the general population.

F. International Tolerances Gellan gum is approved, registered, or filed as a food additive in the countries of Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Columbia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela, Egypt, Hungary, Israel, Jordan, Morocco, Norway, Pakistan, Poland, South Africa, Switzerland, Tunisia, Turkey, Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Malta, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, the Philippines, and Vietnam. In the European community, gellan gum has approval ( E   418) as a food additive. Purity criteria are established by JECFA ( Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives). [ FR Doc. 03   17897 Filed 7   15   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   S]

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ OPP   2003   0225; FRL   7314   7]

Zeta cypermethrin and its inactive isomers; Notice of Filing a Pesticide Petition to Establish a Tolerance for a Certain Pesticide Chemical in or on Food AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice announces the initial filing of a pesticide petition proposing the establishment of regulations for residues of a certain pesticide chemical in or on various food commodities. DATES: Comments, identified by docket ID number OPP   2003   0225, must be received on or before August 15, 2003. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/ courier. Follow the detailed instructions as provided in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda A. DeLuise, Registration Division ( 7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001; telephone number: ( 703) 305   5428; e mail address: deluise. linda@ epa. gov@ epa. gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:   Crop protection ( NAICS 111)   Animal production ( NAICS 112)   Food manufacturing ( NAICS 311)   Pesticide manufacturing ( NAICS 32532) This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be affected. The North American Industrial Classification System ( NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?

1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this action under docket identification ( ID) number OPP   2003   0225. The official public docket consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other information related to this action. Although a part of the official docket, the public docket does not include Confidential Business Information ( CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public docket is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch ( PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall # 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket telephone number is ( 703) 305   5805. 2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the `` Federal Register'' listings at http:// www. epa. gov/ fedrgstr/. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA Dockets at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket/ to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I. B. 1. Once in the system, select `` search,'' then key in the appropriate docket ID number. Certain types of information will not be placed in EPA's Dockets. Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute, which is not included in the official public docket, will not be available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material will not be placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in printed, paper form in the official public docket. To the extent feasible, publicly available docket materials will be made available in EPA's electronic public docket. When a document is selected from the index list in EPA Dockets, the system will identify whether the document is available for viewing in EPA's electronic public docket. Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I. B. EPA intends to work towards providing electronic access to all of the publicly available docket materials through EPA's electronic public docket. For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket. Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 17: 58 Jul 15, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 16JYN1. SGM 16JYN1


[Federal Register: September 22, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 184)]
[Notices]
[Page 55540-55542]
[DOCID:fr22se06-165]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISISON

[Release No. 34-54452; File No. SR-OC-2006-01]

Self-Regulatory Organization; OneChicago, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Block
Trades

September 15, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(7) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-7 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 6, 2006, OneChicago, LLC (``OneChicago'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(7).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OneChicago has also filed the proposed rule change with the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC''). OneChicago filed a
written certification with the CFTC under Section 5c(c) of the
Commodity Exchange Act \3\ on September 5, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 7 U.S.C. 7a-2(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Description of the Proposed Rule
Change

    OneChicago proposes to amend its policy regarding block trades. The
text of the proposed rule change is available at the principal office
of the Exchange and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    OneChicago proposes to amend its current Policies: Block Trades,
Pre-Execution Discussions and Cross Trades (``Block Trade Policy'') to
change the minimum contracts needed to enter into a block trade from
500 to 100; to clarify that block trades must be executed no earlier
than one-half hour before the opening and no later than one-half after
the close of the trading session; to incorporate language from
OneChicago Rule 417; to permit members to report their block trades in
a form and method approved by the Exchange; to clarify that a
combination of trades may be necessary to achieve a specific price
differential for an overall trade event and, for these trades, that
information must be provided to link the related legs of the block
trade event; and other non-substantive changes.
    Currently, the minimum contract size for a block trade on
OneChicago is 500 contracts. The proposed rule change would lower the
minimum quantity needed for block trades to 100. The Exchange believes
the proposed minimum contract size is consistent with similar
requirements in the securities markets.\4\ Since an OneChicago futures
contract on a single stock represents 100 shares of the underlying
stock, the Exchange represents that the proposed block trade minimum
contract size of 100 contracts is equivalent to 10,000 shares of the
underlying stock.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The New York Stock Exchange (``NYSE'') requires a minimum of
10,000 contracts for a block trade. See NYSE ITS Block Trade Policy.
See also Regulation NMS definition of block trade. 17 CFR
242.600(b).
    \5\ See OneChicago Rule 905.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OneChicago also proposes to amend the Block Trade Policy to clarify
the time in which block trades may be executed. Under the proposed rule
change, all block trades must be executed no earlier than one-half hour
before trading in the contract begins on OneChicago and no later than
one-half hour after trading in the contract ends on OneChicago. The
proposed rule change would also add language from OneChicago Rule 417,
which requires that all block trades be reported to the Exchange
without delay after the trades are executed, and the specific terms
related to the block trades that must be reported. The Exchange
believes that adding this portion of OneChicago Rule 417 into the Block
Trade Policy will assist OneChicago members and others reviewing it.
    In order to accommodate its members and provide flexibility in
reporting, OneChicago proposes to add language to the Block Trade
Policy to permit reporting of block trades in a form and method
approved by the Exchange. This would permit a variety of methods for
reporting block trades, such as electronic reporting, reporting by fax,
as well as the current practice of reporting by telephone. Consistent
with this change, the proposed rule change would add language to
clarify that those reporting requirements related to calling the
OneChicago Help Desk would only apply to phoned-in reports.
    The proposed rule change would also add a new footnote to the Block
Trade Policy related to price. The footnote would acknowledge that in
some block transactions a combination of trades may be necessary to
achieve a specific price differential for the overall trade event. The
proposed rule change would also add language requiring the parties to
such a block trade to submit sufficient information to link related
legs to the block trade event. The Exchange believes that this
information will be useful for its regulatory oversight of these
transactions.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,\7\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    OneChicago does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(7) of the Act.\8\ Within 60 days of the date of
effectiveness of the proposed rule change, the Commission, after
consultation with the CFTC, may summarily abrogate the proposed rule
change and require that the proposed rule change be refiled in
accordance with the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Act.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(7).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-OC-2006-01 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-OC-2006-01. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of OneChicago. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All

submissions should refer to File Number SR-OC-2006-01 and should be
submitted on or before October 13, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(73).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-8003 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 23, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10796-10799]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03571]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0653; Project Identifier AD-2020-00631-E;
Amendment 39-21390; AD 2021-02-07]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company Turbofan
Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
General Electric Company (GE) GEnx-1B64, -1B64/P1, -1B64/P2, -1B67, -
1B67/P1, -1B67/P2, -1B70, -1B70/75/P1, -1B70/75/P2, -1B70/P1, -1B70/P2,
-1B70C/P1, -1B70C/P2, -1B74/75/P1, -1B74/75/P2, -1B76/P2, and -1B76A/P2
model turbofan engines. This AD was prompted by a report of a crack in
the outer fuel manifold causing fuel leakage. This AD requires initial
and repetitive visual inspections of the cushioned loop clamp (p-clamp)
and, depending on the results of the inspection, a spot fluorescent
penetrant inspection (FPI) of the outer fuel manifold. Depending on the
results of the FPI, this AD may require replacement of the outer fuel
manifold. This AD also requires initial and repetitive replacements of
the p-clamp. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective March 30, 2021.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 30,
2021.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact General Electric Company, 1 Neumann Way, Cincinnati, OH 45215;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>website:
www.ge.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is
also available at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0653.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0653; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, any
comments received, and other information. The address for Docket
Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mehdi Lamnyi, Aviation Safety
Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would

apply to all GE GEnx-1B64, -1B64/P1, -1B64/P2, -1B67, -1B67/P1, -1B67/
P2, -1B70, -1B70/75/P1, -1B70/75/P2, -1B70/P1, -1B70/P2, -1B70C/P1, -
1B70C/P2, -1B74/75/P1, -1B74/75/P2, -1B76/P2, and -1B76A/P2 model
turbofan engines. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on July
20, 2020 (85 FR 43752). The NPRM was prompted by a report of a crack in
the outer fuel manifold causing fuel leakage. In the NPRM, the FAA
proposed to require initial and repetitive visual inspections of the p-
clamp and, depending on the results of the inspection, a spot FPI of
the outer fuel manifold. Depending on the results of the FPI, the NPRM
proposed to require replacement of the outer fuel manifold. The NPRM
also proposed to require initial and repetitive replacements of the p-
clamp. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received comments from six commenters. The commenters were
Air Lines Pilots Association, International (ALPA); American Airlines
(AAL); Boeing Commercial Airplanes (Boeing); GE Aviation (GE);
Ethiopian Airlines; and United Airlines (UAL). One commenter requested
changes to paragraph (g), Required Actions, of this AD and to On-
Condition Costs. Two commenters requested a change to compliance that
was not implemented. Two commenters requested clarification of the AD
requirements. Four of the six commenters expressed support for the AD.
The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's
response to each comment.

Request To Add Affected P-Clamp Significant Item Number (SIN)

    GE requested that the FAA update paragraph (g), Required Actions,
of this AD to include the affected p-clamp SIN when the p-clamp is
referenced. GE recognized that the p-clamp SIN is defined in paragraph
(h), Definition, of this AD. However, GE reasoned that as there are
multiple p-clamps to be inspected per GEnx-1B Engine Manual, 05-21-00,
MANDATORY INSPECTION, listing the p-clamp SIN in paragraph (g) of this
AD avoids confusion.
    The FAA agrees to include the p-clamp SIN in paragraph (g) of this
AD.

Request To Update On-Condition Cost

    GE requested that the FAA revise the replacement of the outer fuel
manifold in On-Condition Costs from 250 work hours to 2 work hours. GE
reasoned that GE GEnx-1B Service Bulletin (SB) 73-0080 R01, dated
August 29, 2019, references GE GEnx-1B SB 73-0053 for instructions to
replace the outer fuel manifold. GE noted that GE GEnx-1B SB 73-0053
estimates that two hours are needed to replace the outer fuel manifold.
GE stated that the discrepancy between the NPRM and service information
could cause confusion or lead operators to opt to remove the engine to
perform the outer fuel manifold replacement.
    The FAA agrees. The FAA changed the estimated labor hours for
replacing the outer fuel manifold in the On-Condition Costs section of
this AD from 250 work hours to 2 work hours. The FAA also changed the
estimated cost per product for replacing the outer fuel manifold in the
On-Condition Costs section of this AD from $39,650 to $18,570, which
reflects the reduction in labor hours.

Request To Allow Use of Later Revisions of Service Information

    AAL and UAL requested that the FAA add the phrase ``or later'' when
referencing the service information in this AD. AAL stated that the
manufacturer indicated that the service information is intended only to
be a containment measure. Specifying ``or later'' could prevent
numerous requests for Alternative Methods of Compliance if the
manufacturer revises the service information. UAL stated that the
manufacturer is developing a terminating action and, as a result, a
revision to the service information is expected.
    The FAA disagrees with adding language that allows the use of later
revisions of the service information when performing the required
actions of this AD. Later revisions of the service information have not
been published by the manufacturer or reviewed by the FAA.

Request To Clarify Sending the Outer Fuel Manifold for Repair

    AAL requested that the FAA clarify if the removed outer fuel
manifold needs to be sent for repair. AAL cited references within
paragraph 3.B.(4)(b) of GE GEnx-1B SB 73-0080 R01, dated August 29,
2019, that instructs operators to send removed outer fuel manifolds for
repair.
    The FAA agrees that sending a removed outer fuel manifold for
repair, as stated in paragraph 3.B.(4)(b) of GE GEnx-1B SB 73-0080 R01,
dated August 29, 2019, is not mandated by this AD. This AD addresses
the unsafe condition by requiring the removal of an outer fuel manifold
if a crack or a sign of leakage is found and replacing it with a part
eligible for installation. This AD does not require sending an outer
fuel manifold removed in accordance with paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this AD
for repair. The FAA clarified this by adding paragraph (i), No Repair
Requirement, to this AD.

Request To Clarify if Need To Comply Again

    Ethiopian Airlines asked if operators who inspected and replaced
the affected p-clamp using GE GEnx-1B SB 73-0080 R01, dated August 29,
2019, before the effective date of this AD, need to comply again.
    If operators performed the initial visual inspection and
replacement of the p-clamp as required by paragraphs (g)(1) and (3) of
this AD before the effective date of this AD, then these actions meet
the initial visual inspection and replacement requirements of this AD.
Paragraph (f), Compliance, of this AD requires compliance with this AD
within the times specified, unless already done. If the initial visual
inspection and replacement of the p-clamp was already performed prior
to the effective date of this AD, operators must perform the repetitive
inspections, follow-on-actions, and replacements of the p-clamp
required by paragraphs (g)(1)(i), (2), and (3) of this AD using the
stated compliance intervals.

Support for the AD

    AAL, ALPA, Boeing, and UAL expressed support for the AD.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered any comments
received, and determined that air safety requires adopting this AD as
proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products. Except for minor editorial changes and any
other changes described previously, this AD is adopted as proposed in
the NPRM. None of the changes will increase the economic burden on any
operator.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed GE GEnx-1B SB 73-0080 R01, dated August 29, 2019.
This SB describes procedures for replacing the p-clamp located at the
signal fuel tube hose, SIN 34200, and instructions for removing the
signal fuel tube hose when a p-clamp is found damaged or missing. This
service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course

of business or by the means identified in ADDRESSES.

Interim Action

    The FAA considers this AD interim action. The manufacturer is still
reviewing this unsafe condition and may develop a terminating action.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 190 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry.
    The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visually inspect the p-clamp..........  0.25 work-hours x $85                 $0          $21.25       $4,037.50
                                         per hour = $21.25.
Replace the p-clamp...................  0.25 work-hours x $85 =              102          123.25       23,417.50
                                         $21.25.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary FPIs and
replacements that are required based on the results of the visual
inspection. The agency has no way of determining the number of aircraft
that require FPI or replacement:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                    Action                                 Labor cost               Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FPI the outer fuel manifold...................  2.5 work-hours x $85 per hour =               $0         $212.50
                                                 $212.50.
Replace the outer fuel manifold...............  2 work-hours x $85 per hour =             18,400          18,570
                                                 $170.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2021-02-07 General Electric Company: Amendment 39-21390; Docket No.
FAA-2020-0653; Project Identifier AD-2020-00631-E.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective March 30, 2021.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all General Electric Company (GE) GEnx-1B64,
-1B64/P1, -1B64/P2, -1B67, -1B67/P1, -1B67/P2, -1B70, -1B70/75/P1, -
1B70/75/P2, -1B70/P1, -1B70/P2, -1B70C/P1, -1B70C/P2, -1B74/75/P1, -
1B74/75/P2, -1B76/P2, and -1B76A/P2 model turbofan engines.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7310, Engine Fuel
Distribution.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report of a crack in the outer fuel
manifold causing fuel leakage. The FAA is issuing this AD to prevent
failure of the outer fuel manifold. The unsafe condition, if not
addressed, could result in engine fire and damage to the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    (1) Within 500 flight cycles (FCs) after the effective date of
this AD, perform a visual inspection of the cushioned loop clamp (p-
clamp), significant item number (SIN) 34282, to verify the p-clamp
is undamaged and installed.
    (i) Thereafter, perform the visual inspection required by (g)(1)
of this AD at intervals not to exceed 500 FCs since the last
inspection.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (2) If, during any visual inspection required by paragraphs
(g)(1) or (g)(1)(i) of this AD, the p-clamp (SIN 34282) is outside
of the limits in paragraph 3.B.(4) of GE GEnx-1B Service Bulletin
(SB) 73-0080 R01, dated August 29, 2019, or if the p-clamp (SIN

34282) is missing, perform a spot fluorescent penetrant inspection
of the outer fuel manifold, part number (P/N) 2403M46G01, SIN 34302,
using Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 3.B.(4)(b), of GE GEnx-
1B SB 73-0080 R01, dated August 29, 2019.
    (i) If a crack or a sign of fuel leakage is found, before
further flight, remove the outer fuel manifold, P/N 2403M46G01, SIN
34302, from service and replace with a part eligible for
installation.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) Within 500 FCs after the effective date of this AD, and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 500 FCs from the last p-clamp
replacement, replace the p-clamp (SIN 34282) with a new p-clamp (SIN
34282). Complete this required action after performing the visual
inspections required by paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(1)(i) of this AD.

(h) Definition

    For the purpose of this AD, a p-clamp is a clamp, P/N J1432P12,
with SIN 34282, located at the signal fuel tube hose, SIN 34200, as
shown in Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 3, Figure 1, ``Outer
Fuel Manifold and Clamp Location,'' of GE GEnx-1B SB 73-0080 R01,
dated August 29, 2019.

(i) No Repair Requirement

    Sending a removed outer fuel manifold for repair, as set forth
in the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 3.B.(4)(b), of GE
GEnx-1B SB 73-0080 R01, dated August 29, 2019, is not required by
this AD.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in Related Information. You may email your request to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(k) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Mehdi Lamnyi,
Aviation Safety Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) General Electric Company (GE) GEnx-1B Service Bulletin 73-
0080 R01, dated August 29, 2019.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For GE service information identified in this AD, contact
General Electric Company, 1 Neumann Way, Cincinnati, OH 45215;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
website: www.ge.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on January 8, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-03571 Filed 2-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 23, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64787-64789]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25556]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2012-0610; FRL-9741-7]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Reasonably Available Control Technology Requirements for
Volatile Organic Compounds

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by the State of Maryland. These revisions pertain
to the adoption of various test methods, calculations methods, work
practice standards and exemptions which make Maryland Department of the
Environment (MDE) regulations more consistent with the EPA's Control
Techniques Guidelines (CTGs) for seven source categories. These
categories are: Paper, film, and foil coatings; industrial cleaning
solvents; miscellaneous metal and plastic parts coatings; large
appliance coatings; offset lithographic printing and letterpress
printing; flat wood paneling coatings and flexible package printing.
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 23,
2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2012-0610 by one of the following methods:
    A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    B. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2012-0610, Donna Mastro, Acting Associate
Director, Office of Air Program Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
    D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2012-0610. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal
are available at the Maryland Department of the Environment, 1800
Washington Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, Maryland 21230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Lewis,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.

I. Background

    The Clean Air Act (CAA) section 172(c)(1) provides that SIPs for
nonattainment areas must include ``reasonably available control
measures'' (RACM), including ``reasonably available control technology
'' (RACT), for sources of emissions. Section 182(b)(2)(A) of the CAA
provides that for certain nonattainment areas, states must revise their
SIPs to include RACT for sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC)
emissions covered by a CTG document issued after November 15, 1990 and
prior to the area's date of attainment.
    EPA develops CTGs as guidance on control requirements for specific
source categories. The CTGs are intended to provide state and local air
pollution control authorities information that should assist them in
determining RACT for VOC. The State of Maryland through MDE submitted
revisions to its SIP to address the following RACT source categories:
(1) Paper, film, and foil coatings; (2) industrial cleaning solvents;
(3) miscellaneous metal and plastic parts coatings; (4) large appliance
coatings; (5) offset lithographic printing and letterpress printing;
(6) flat wood paneling coatings; and (7) flexible package printing.
    In 1977, 1978, 1993 and 1994, EPA developed CTGs for all the source
categories listed above, and in 2006, 2007 and 2008, EPA developed new
CTGs for these source categories after conducting a review of existing
state and local VOC emission reduction approaches for these industries,
reviewing the original CTGs, and taking into account the information
that has become available since original development. EPA's new CTGs
are entitled Control Techniques Guidelines for Paper, Film, and Foil
Coatings (EPA 453/R-07-003, September 2007), Control Techniques
Guidelines: Industrial Cleaning Solvents (EPA 453/R-06-001, September
2006), Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and
Plastic Parts Coatings (EPA-453/R-08-003, September 2008), Control
Techniques Guidelines for Large Appliance Coatings (EPA 453/R-07-004,
September 2007), Control Techniques Guidelines for Offset Lithographic
Printing and Letterpress Printing (EPA-453/R-06-002, September 2006),
Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood Paneling Coatings (EPA 453/
R-06-004, September 2006), and Control Techniques Guidelines for
Flexible Package Printing (EPA 453/R-06-003, September 2006). These new
CTGs include new general requirements along with testing, work
practice, and recordkeeping requirements.

II. Summary of SIP Revision

    On April 5, 2012, EPA received a SIP revision from MDE which
addressed sources of VOC emissions covered by EPA's CTGs for the seven
source categories identified above and which includes amendments to
COMAR <IP_ADDRESS> and COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>.

A. Amendments to Regulation .04 Testing and Monitoring Under COMAR
26.11.01 General Administrative Provisions

    The new amendments to COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>C provide updated provisions
for the test methods that are referenced under COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>D.
These amendments incorporate by reference federal methods under Section
C (Emissions Test Methods) and include: (1) 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A,
as amended; (2) MDE's Technical Memorandum 91-01, ``Test Methods and
Equipment Specifications for Stationary Sources,'' January 1991, as
amended through Supplement 3 (October 1, 1997); and (3) for course
particulate matter (PM10) stack tests (a) Test Methods 201 A
and 202 in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix M, as amended; (b) Test Method 5
(40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A, as amended) and Test Method 202 in 40 CFR
Part 51, Appendix M, as amended; (c) Test Method 5 (40 CFR Part 60,
Appendix A, as amended) using front half and back half procedure; (d)
EPA Conditional Test Method 39 as a substitute for Test Method 202 in
40 CFR Part 51, Appendix M, as amended; or (e) Alternative test methods
for PM10 if they are approved by MDE and the EPA.

 B. Amendments to Regulation .02 Applicability, Determining Compliance,
Reporting and General Requirements Under COMAR 26.11.19 Volatile
Organic Compounds from Specific Processes

    The amendments to COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>(D), (E), and (I) apply to
sources covered by the CTG categories and other regulations covered
under COMAR 26.11.19 involving testing, cleaning solutions, solvents,
or degreasing materials. These amendments make the requirements more
consistent with EPA's CTG guidance for alternative test methods,
calculation methods, and work practice standards.
    COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>(D) (Test Methods) establishes methods, procedures
and requirements for the alternative testing of control devices. The
revision amends COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>(D)(2) by requiring sources that use
air pollution control equipment to comply with the requirements of
COMAR 26.11.19 make the determination in accordance with COMAR
<IP_ADDRESS>(C). The revision also adds COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>(D)(3)
requiring MDE and EPA approval if a source chooses to determine
compliance using alternative test methods.
    COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>(E) (Computations) establishes methods, procedures
and requirements for calculations needed to determine compliance with
regulations covered under COMAR 26.11.19. The addition of COMAR
<IP_ADDRESS>(E)(3) establishes the method required to determine
composite vapor pressure of solvent cleaning material. The addition of
COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>(E)(4) establishes the method to determine mass VOC to
mass solids applied for coatings, adhesives, or inks. The addition of
COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>(E)(5) establishes the method to determine the weight
of VOC in units of weight VOC per weight coating applied for coatings,
adhesives, or inks.
    The amendment to COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>(G) (Control of Major Stationary
Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds) exempts additional VOC RACT
regulations that had not been adopted since 1991. The regulation now
exempts major stationary sources that are subject to COMAR 26.11.10,
COMAR 26.11.11, COMAR 26.11.13, COMAR 26.11.14, and COMAR
<IP_ADDRESS>-.33.
    COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>(I) (Good Operating Practices, Equipment Cleanup,
and VOC Storage) adds additional work practice requirements for the
handling of cleaning material. This revision adds three additional good
operating practice requirements to the previous five requirements under
COMAR <IP_ADDRESS>(I)(2)(b). They include minimizing spills of VOC-
containing cleaning materials, minimizing VOC emissions from cleaning
of storage, mixing, and conveying equipment and also requiring closed
containers or pipelines be used to transport VOC-containing cleaning
materials from one location to another.
    A detailed summary of EPA's review and rationale for proposing to
approve this SIP revision may be found in the Technical Support
Document (TSD) for this action which is available on line at http://www.regulations.gov, Docket number EPA-R03-OAR-2012-0610.

III. Proposed Action

    EPA is proposing to approve Maryland's SIP revision submitted April
5, 2012, amending Regulation .04 Testing and Monitoring under COMAR
26.11.01 General Administrative Provisions and Regulation .02
Applicability, Determining Compliance, Reporting and General
Requirements under COMAR 26.11.19 Volatile Organic Compounds from
Specific Processes for adoption of various test methods, calculations
methods, work practice standards, and exemptions in accordance with
CTGs for VOC RACT. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues
discussed in this document. These comments will be considered before
taking final action.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this proposed rule concerning Maryland's adoption of
various test methods, calculations methods, work practice standards and
exemptions in accordance with CTGs for VOC RACT does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian
country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: October 02, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2012-25556 Filed 10-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 17209]
[FR Doc No: 2023-05792]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14514-003]

Community of Elfin Cove Non Profit Corporation, DBA Elfin Cove
Utility Commission; Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission)
regulations, 18 CFR \1\ part 380, the Office of Energy Projects has
reviewed the application for a license to construct and operate the
Crooked Creek and Jim's Lake Hydroelectric Project. The project would
be located on Crooked Creek and Jim's Lake, near the community of Elfin
Cove, in the Sitka Recording District, Unorganized Borough, Alaska.
Commission staff has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the
project. The project would occupy 10.5 acres of federal land in the
Tongass National Forest, managed by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture's Forest Service.
    The EA contains the staff's analysis of the potential environmental
impacts of the project and concludes that licensing the project, with
appropriate environmental protective measures, would not constitute a
major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the
human environment.
    The Commission provides all interested persons with an opportunity
to view and/or print the EA via the internet through the Commission's
Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov/), using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter
the docket number, excluding the last three digits in the docket number
field, to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online
Support at [email protected], or toll-free at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    You may also register online at https://ferconline.ferc.gov/FERCOnline.aspx to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    Any comments should be filed within 30 days from the date of this
notice.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to
6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end of your comments. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support. In lieu of electronic
filing, you may submit a paper copy. Submissions sent via the U.S.
Postal Service must be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Room 1A,
Washington, DC 20426. Submissions sent via any other carrier must be
addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The first
page of any filing should include docket number P-14514-003.
    For further information, contact John Matkowski at<PHONE_NUMBER>
or by email at [email protected].

    Dated: March 15, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-05792 Filed 3-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P