[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56924-56925]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22218]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: PR21-66-000.
    Applicants: Louisville Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Submits tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)/: Operating
Statement Rate Change Revised Exhibit A to be effective 9/1/2021 under
PR21-66.
    Filed Date: 9/28/21.
    Accession Number: 20210928-5041.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/19/21.

    Docket Numbers: PR21-67-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.
    Description: Submits tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)/: COH Rates
effective August 27 2021 to be effective 8/27/2021 under PR21-67.
    Filed Date: 9/30/21.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>90.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/21/21.

    Docket Numbers: PR22-1-000.
    Applicants: Permian Highway Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Submits tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)/: PHP Fuel
Filing 2021.10.01 to be effective 10/1/2021 under PR22-1.
    Filed Date: 10/1/2021.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>36.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/22/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-26-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: List of Non-Conforming Service
Agreements (ASR et al--Six One Commodities) to be effective 11/5/2021.
    Filed Date: 10/5/21.
    Accession Number: 20211005-5024.
    Comments Date: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/21.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings

must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but
intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 6, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-22218 Filed 10-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 	INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST (ICR)

	SF-83 SUPPORTING STATEMENT

	ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

	STRATOSPHERIC OZONE PROTECTION

1.   Identification of Information Collection

a)   Title: Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program Final
Rulemaking under Title VI of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (OMB
Control Number: 2060-0226)

b)   Short Characterization

Title VI of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (the Act) implements
the obligation of the United States under the Montreal Protocol on
Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer to phase out the use of
ozone-depleting substances.  Section 612 of Title VI establishes as U.S.
policy the requirement that Class I and Class II ozone-depleting
substances shall be replaced, to the maximum extent practicable, by
chemicals, product substitutes, or alternative manufacturing processes
that reduce overall risks to human health and the environment.

EPA developed its Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program to
fulfill the requirements of Section 612.  The five major provisions of
Section 612 are:

Rulemaking:  Section 612(c) requires EPA to enact rules making it
unlawful to replace any Class I or II substance with any substitute that
the Administrator determines may present adverse effects to human health
or the environment where an alternative has been identified that (1)
reduces the overall risk to human health and the environment, and (2) is
currently or potentially available.

Listing of Unacceptable/Acceptable Substitutes:  Section 612(c) also
requires EPA to publish a list of the substitutes prohibited for
specific uses.  EPA must publish a corresponding list of acceptable
alternatives for specific uses as well.

 	Petition Process:  Section 612(d) grants the right for any person to
petition EPA to add or delete a substance from the lists published in
accordance with Section 612(c).  EPA has 90 days to grant or deny a
petition.

	90-day notification:  Section 612(e) authorizes EPA to require any
person who produces a chemical substitute for a Class I substance to
notify EPA not less than 90 days before the new or existing chemicals
are introduced into interstate commerce for significant new uses as
substitutes for a Class I substance.  The producer must also provide EPA
with all unpublished health and safety studies on such substitutes.

   Clearinghouse:  Section 612(b)(4) requires EPA to set up a public
clearinghouse of alternative chemicals, product substitutes, and
alternative manufacturing processes that are available for products and
manufacturing processes which use Class I and II substances.

EPA issued regulations on March 18, 1994, in 59 FR 13043, which are
codified at 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 82, Subpart G
(Section 82.170 et seq.), establishing the SNAP program.  EPA’s major
activities in the SNAP program are to review proposed substitutes based
on the risk-assessment criteria and the procedures set forth in the
regulations, and to publish (and update)  lists of acceptable and
unacceptable substitutes by end use categories.

The information required for collection under the SNAP regulations is
described below in Section 4 of this statement, and is currently
approved by OMB for use through June 30, 2011.  EPA is in the process of
publishing a notice of intention to renew this information collection
request.  This notice of intention will be published in the Federal
Register.

The previous ICR of 2007 had the following Terms of Clearance:

“The collection is approved for 3 years. OMB notes that the
recordkeeping requirement does not stem from the requirements of the
SNAP program but from the enforcement requirements as stated in the
supporting statement. If the agency revises the enforcement
requirements, then the recordkeeping requirement should be updated
accordingly. “

EPA is not revising enforcement requirements at this time.

2.   Need for and Use of the Collection

a)   Authority for the Collection

Information required to be collected under the SNAP program is intended
to fulfill the general mandate in Section 612(c) of identifying
acceptable substitutes that can serve as replacements for
ozone-depleting substances being phased out under the Act, as well as
unacceptable substances which may not be used as replacements for
ozone-depleting substances being phased out under the Act.  Section 612
(42 U.S.C. 7671k) is attached as Appendix B, and EPA’s implementing
regulations (40 CFR Part 82, Subpart G, Sect. 82.170 et seq.) are
attached as Appendix C.

b)   Use/Users of the Data

EPA's Stratospheric Protection Division (SPD) uses the information
submitted to evaluate the health and environmental effects of proposed
alternatives for industrial and commercial uses that have historically
used Class I and Class II ozone-depleting substances.

3.   Non-duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria

a)   Non-duplication

The specific information requested by this notice is not currently
collected by EPA or any other government agency.  According to the
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) report, Environmental
Effects of Ozone Depletion and its Interactions with Climate Change:
2010 Assessment, EPA’s SNAP program is the only national program in
the world designed to evaluate alternatives to ozone-depleting
substances, and as such, represents the most comprehensive and
accessible resource for information on alternatives.

Use of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) SNAP Addendum form
(described in section 4(b) of this statement) will ensure that companies
participating in the TSCA Pre-Manufacture Notice (PMN) program will not
duplicate their data in reporting to the SNAP program.

b)  Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB

In compliance with the 1995 Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), EPA sought
public comments for a 60-day period prior to submitting the ICR renewal
package to OMB.  These comments, which are used partly to determine
realistic burden estimates for respondents, must be considered when
completing the Supporting Statement that is submitted to OMB.

The announcement of a public comment period for this renewal ICR was
published in the Federal Register on January 31, 2011 (76 FR 5366).  EPA
sought public comments, pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d), on the previous
burden estimates being sought by the Agency.  EPA received no comments.

c)   Consultations

In developing the regulations under the Act, EPA established an advisory
committee for issues relating to stratospheric ozone.  The Stratospheric
Ozone Protection Advisory Committee (STOPAC) membership included
representatives from affected industries, environmental interest groups,
and academics in related fields.  Within the STOPAC, subcommittees were
formed to look at more detailed issues.  The subcommittee on the SNAP
program met several times to discuss possible substitutes for
ozone-depleting substances, guiding principles for SNAP evaluations, and
strategies to obtain information about substitutes from industry.  This
consultation was invaluable in developing the SNAP Information Notice
form (described below in section 4(b).)  EPA also received comments on
its proposed SNAP regulations, which identified the information to be
collected through the SNAP program, and these comments were also helpful
in developing the SNAP Information Notice form.

In preparing to renew this information collection request, EPA consulted
with fewer than nine actual or potential respondents to discuss
estimated burden hours and costs associated with this information
collection request.  The respondents with whom EPA consulted are from
various industries, companies, and organizations that have recently
reported to the SNAP program.  They include: Katarzyna Bober of
Honeywell at<PHONE_NUMBER>; Kelley Kline of General Electric at
502-452-7603; and Nesa Dunn of Global Safety Labs at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

d)   Effects of Less Frequent Collection

The SNAP program has minimized the number of reporting and recordkeeping
requirements as much as possible by requiring only a one-time
application, and a one-time recordkeeping of documents submitted to EPA.

e)   General Guidelines

This rule does not exceed any of the guidelines, except for records
retention for more than 3 years.  Retention periods for the two SNAP
recordkeeping requirements (described below in section 4(b) of this
statement) are not specified in Title VI of the Act or in the SNAP
regulations, but EPA requires retention of these records for five years
for enforcement purposes, pursuant to statutory authority under 28
U.S.C. Section 2462, the applicable statute of limitations.  Sec. 2462
states:

Except as otherwise provided by Act of Congress, an action, suit or
proceeding for the enforcement of any civil fine, penalty, or
forfeiture, pecuniary or otherwise, shall not be entertained unless
commenced within five years from the date when the claim first accrued
if, within the same period, the offender or the property is found within
the United States in order that proper service may be made thereon.

f)   Confidentiality

Measures to protect confidentiality of information collected under the
SNAP program are based on EPA’s confidentiality regulations (40 CFR
2.201 et seq., or Subpart B.)  SNAP regulations (at 40 CFR 82.182)
describe these measures, which are also mentioned on the front page of
each of the SNAP forms.  Each form mentions basic information about
asserting confidentiality claims, and also instructs the submitter to
read the Instruction Manual, which contains more detailed discussion of
the procedures for confidentiality claims.  (See pages 7-9 of the
Instruction Manual, which, as described in section 4(b), is attached as
Appendix F).  These procedures are described briefly below.

Submitters may designate all or portions of their forms or petitions as
confidential.  EPA requires the submitters to substantiate their claim
of confidentiality.  The submitter is advised that, under Section 114(c)
of the Act, emissions data may not be claimed as confidential.  The
submitter is also advised that there are further instances, described in
the provisions of 40 CFR Part 2, Subpart B, in which confidential
assertions may be reopened or denied even when confidentiality claims
are initially received.  The submitter will be contacted as part of such
an evaluation process.  If required substantiation is not provided along
with the submission of information claimed as confidential, EPA may make
the information available to the public without further notice.  The
submitter must provide one copy of the submission which contains no
information claimed as confidential.  The non-confidential submission
will be put in the public docket.

If toxicity or health and safety studies are listed as confidential,
this information cannot be maintained as confidential where such data
are also submitted under TSCA or the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) to the extent that confidential treatment is
prohibited under those statutes.  However, information in a toxicity
study that is not health and safety data and is not relevant to the
effects of a substance on human health and the environment, e.g.,
discussion of process information, or proprietary blends, can be
maintained as confidential subject to 40 CFR Part 2, Subpart B.

Information submitted as part of a joint submission to either SNAP/TSCA
or SNAP/FIFRA must adhere to the security provisions of the program
offices implementing these statutes.  For such submissions, the SNAP
handling of such notices will follow the security provisions under these
statutes.

g)   Sensitive Questions

This section does not apply because the SNAP regulations and the
associated information collection request do not seek information of a
sensitive nature.

4.   The Respondents and the Information Requested

a)   Respondents

Respondents for reporting requirements, as well as for the recordkeeping
requirement for the exemption for small volume use, include
manufacturers, importers, formulators and processors of substitutes for
ozone-depleting substances.  Principally, these respondents are in the
following major categories of industry groups, by Standard Industry Code
(SIC) and North American Industry Classification System (NAICS):

Manufacturers, Chemicals and Allied Products

Industry	SIC	NAICS

Plastics materials and synthetics	282	 HYPERLINK
"file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\Local%20Settings\\Mfiffer\\Loca
l%20Settings\\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\\Content.IE5\\2004Renewal\\NA
ICS32B.HTM" \l "N325211" 325211

Soap, cleaners, and toilet goods	284	 HYPERLINK
"file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\Local%20Settings\\Mfiffer\\Loca
l%20Settings\\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\\Content.IE5\\2004Renewal\\NA
ICS32B.HTM" \l "N325611" 325611

Paints and allied products	285	 HYPERLINK
"file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\Local%20Settings\\Mfiffer\\Loca
l%20Settings\\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\\Content.IE5\\2004Renewal\\NA
ICS32B.HTM" \l "N32551" 32551

Industrial organic chemicals	286	 HYPERLINK
"file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\Local%20Settings\\Mfiffer\\Loca
l%20Settings\\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\\Content.IE5\\2004Renewal\\NA
ICS32B.HTM" \l "N325191" 325191

Miscellaneous chemical products	289	 HYPERLINK
"file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\Local%20Settings\\Mfiffer\\Loca
l%20Settings\\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\\Content.IE5\\2004Renewal\\NA
ICS32B.HTM" \l "N325998" 325998

Manufacturers, Rubber and Misc. Plastics Products

Industry	SIC	NAICS

Plastics foam products	3086	 HYPERLINK
"file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\Local%20Settings\\Mfiffer\\Loca
l%20Settings\\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\\Content.IE5\\2004Renewal\\NA
ICS32B.HTM" \l "N32615" 32615

Wholesale Trade- Nondurable Goods

Industry	SIC	NAICS

Chemicals and allied products	516	 HYPERLINK
"file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\Local%20Settings\\Mfiffer\\Loca
l%20Settings\\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\\Content.IE5\\2004Renewal\\NA
ICS42.HTM" \l "N42261" 42261

Miscellaneous nondurable products	519	 HYPERLINK
"file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\Local%20Settings\\Mfiffer\\Loca
l%20Settings\\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\\Content.IE5\\2004Renewal\\NA
ICS42.HTM" \l "N42299" 42299

Respondents for the recordkeeping requirement for substitutes acceptable
subject to use conditions or narrowed use limits include end users of
the substitutes in the following industrial sectors:

Construction- Special Trade Contractors

Industry	SIC	NAICS

Plumbing, heating, and air-conditioning	171	 HYPERLINK
"file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\Local%20Settings\\Mfiffer\\Loca
l%20Settings\\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\\Content.IE5\\2004Renewal\\NA
ICS23.HTM" \l "N23511" 23511

Manufacturing- Industrial Machinery & Equipment

Industry	SIC	NAICS

Computer and office equipment	357	 HYPERLINK
"file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\Local%20Settings\\Mfiffer\\Loca
l%20Settings\\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\\Content.IE5\\2004Renewal\\NA
ICS33B.HTM" \l "N334111" 334111  ,  HYPERLINK
"file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\Local%20Settings\\Mfiffer\\Loca
l%20Settings\\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\\Content.IE5\\2004Renewal\\NA
ICS33B.HTM" \l "N333313" 333313

Refrigeration and service machinery	358	 HYPERLINK
"file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\Local%20Settings\\Mfiffer\\Loca
l%20Settings\\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\\Content.IE5\\2004Renewal\\NA
ICS33B.HTM" \l "N333415" 333415

Manufacturing- Electronic & Other Electric Equipment

Industry	SIC	NAICS

Electric distribution equipment	361	 HYPERLINK
"file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\Local%20Settings\\Mfiffer\\Loca
l%20Settings\\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\\Content.IE5\\2004Renewal\\NA
ICS33B.HTM" \l "N335311" 335311

Electric industrial apparatus	362	 HYPERLINK
"file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\Local%20Settings\\Mfiffer\\Loca
l%20Settings\\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\\Content.IE5\\2004Renewal\\NA
ICS33B.HTM" \l "N335312" 335312

Communications equipment	366	 HYPERLINK
"file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\Local%20Settings\\Mfiffer\\Loca
l%20Settings\\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\\Content.IE5\\2004Renewal\\NA
ICS33B.HTM" \l "N33421" 33421

Electronic components and accessories	367	 HYPERLINK
"file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\Local%20Settings\\Mfiffer\\Loca
l%20Settings\\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\\Content.IE5\\2004Renewal\\NA
ICS33B.HTM" \l "N334411" 334411

Manufacturing- Transportation Equipment

Industry	SIC	NAICS

Automobile manufacturing	371	336111

Aircraft and parts	372	336412

Ship and boat building and repairing	373	336611

Manufacturing- Instruments & Related Products

Industry	SIC	NAICS

Search and navigation equipment	381	334511

Medical instruments and supplies	384	339112

Ophthalmic goods	385	339115

Services

Industry	SIC	NAICS

Services to buildings	734	56179

Computer and data processing services	737	541511

Refrigeration service and repair	7623	811412, 81131

b)   Information Requested

i)   Data Items (including recordkeeping requirements):

To simplify and expedite the submission and review of SNAP notices, EPA
has developed the following forms and an instruction manual:

-    SNAP Information Notice (Appendix D)

-    TSCA/SNAP Addendum (Appendix E)

-    Instructions for the SNAP Program Information Notice and TSCA/SNAP

     Addendum (Appendix F)

The SNAP Information Notice is the form used in most submissions to give
notice of a respondent’s plans to introduce a proposed substitute into
the marketplace.  The TSCA/SNAP Addendum is an abbreviated SNAP form for
submissions in situations where there is joint statutory review between
the TSCA PMN program and the SNAP program.  The full SNAP Information
Notice should be used in the case of a joint review with the FIFRA.  A
petition should include the same information that is requested in the
SNAP Information Notice.  No additional information is required for a
petition.  The instruction manual provides further information for a
respondent preparing any of these submissions.

The forms were developed to minimize the reporting burden for the
submitter; however, their use is optional.  Respondents with more
efficient means of submitting the information are encouraged to use
them.  EPA has based the estimated respondent burden and cost on the use
of the recommended forms; to the extent a respondent uses more efficient
means to submit the data, the estimates contained in this analysis may
overestimate the respondent burden and cost.

1.   SNAP Information Notice/ Petition Data Items:  Reference: Sections
82.176(a), 82.178, 82.180(a)(5), 82.184(c)

The information requested on the SNAP Information Notice includes the
following data items:

Name and description of the substitute.  To the extent possible, the
substitute should be identified by its (1) commercial name, (2) chemical
name, (3) trade name(s), (4) generic name, (5) identification numbers
(e.g., CAS registry, NIOSH RTECS, EPA hazardous waste, OHM-TADS,
DOT/UN/NA/IMCO shipping, HSDB, NCI), (6) chemical formula, and (7)
chemical structure.

Physical and chemical information.  Key properties that should be
included to characterize the substitute are:  molecular weight; physical
state;  melting point;  boiling point;  density;  odor threshold;
solubility;  partition coefficients (Log Kow, Log Koc);  and vapor
pressure.

Substitute applications.  Identification of the applications in which
the substitutes are likely to be used is required.  It is essential to
provide a complete list of potential uses as the substitute listing
required by section 612(c) is specific to application.

Process description.  For each application identified, EPA is requesting
available descriptive data on processing, including in-place pollution
controls. Such information will be helpful in characterizing workplace
and environmental releases and exposures.

Ozone depletion potential.  The predicted ozone depletion potential
(ODP) of substitute chemicals is requested.  The submitter should also
provide sufficient supporting documentation-- either a citation or the
background information used to develop the ODP.  For purposes of
calculating ODP, EPA recommends the methodology used in the most recent
Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion, which was prepared for the
United Nations Environment Programme.

Global warming potential.  EPA requests readily available data on the
global warming potential (GWP) and atmospheric lifetime of the
substitute in its particular application (e.g., as a refrigerant, foam
blowing agent, etc.)  EPA requests that all GWPs be referenced to CO2
using the methodology recommended by the most recent assessment report
from the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC).  To the
extent that data is available, EPA also considers indirect effects.
Indirect effects explicitly consider the impact on global warming
arising from changes in energy consumption associated with the use of a
substitute (e.g., an alternative refrigerant).  This latter measure can
be identified as changes in energy efficiency or demand relative to the
substitute being replaced.

Toxicity data.  Information on toxicity from acute and chronic exposure
to a substitute chemical, its impurities, and its degradation products
on any organism (e.g., humans, mammals, fish, wildlife, and plants) is
required. For mammals, EPA requests a minimum submission of the
following tests to characterize substitute risks: a range-finding study,
and a 28-day subchronic repeated dose study in an appropriate rodent
species.  For substitutes that are being evaluated as fire suppressants,
refrigerants, or aerosols, a cardiotoxicity study, usually performed on
a dog, may be required.  Additional mammalian toxicity tests will be
identified based on the substitute and application being evaluated.  To
sufficiently characterize aquatic toxicity concerns, both acute and
chronic toxicity test results for a variety of species is required.  EPA
requires a minimum data set as described in "Guidelines for Deriving
Numerical National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic
Organisms and their Uses," which is available through the National
Technical Information Service (#PB 85-227049).  Other relevant
information and data summaries, such as the Material Safety Data Sheets,
should also be submitted.  Submission of the actual toxicity studies is
most beneficial; however, it is not necessary to submit these reports if
they have been supplied to EPA as part of other regulatory submissions.
To assist in locating these studies, the submitter must provide a
sufficiently clear citation to ensure that these studies can be located
by EPA in a timely fashion.  EPA requires that submitters providing
information on new chemicals for joint review under TSCA and SNAP adhere
to the TSCA minimum testing requirements described in TSCA section 5.

Environmental Fate and Transport.  Where available, information must be
submitted on the environmental fate and transport of substitutes.  Such
data shall include information on bioaccumulation, biodegradation,
adsorption, volatility, transformation, and other data necessary to
characterize movement and reaction of substitutes in the environment.

Flammability.  Data on the flammability of a substitute chemical or
mixture are required.  Specifically, data on flash point and
flammability limits are needed, as well as information on the procedures
used for determining the flammability limits.  For substitutes that will
be used in consumer applications, documentation of testing results
conducted by independent laboratories (e.g., Underwriters Laboratories)
should be submitted where appropriate.  Detail on any suggested
abatement techniques to minimize the risks associated with the use of
flammable substances or blends should also be provided.  EPA recognizes
that many promising alternatives may be considered marginally flammable,
but can be used safely and effectively.  The information requested on
this topic will help EPA make a balanced decision regarding the use of a
flammable alternative.

Exposure data.  The submitter should provide extant modeling or
monitoring data on exposures associated with the manufacture,
formulation, transport, and use of a substitute.  Descriptive process
information for each substitute application, as requested above, will be
used to develop exposure estimates where measured exposure data are not
readily available.  Depending on the application, exposure profiles will
be needed for workers, consumers, and the general population.

Environmental release data.  Available data on emissions from the
substitute application and equipment, as well as pollutant releases or
discharge to all environmental media (ambient air, surface water,
hazardous/solid waste), are needed to complete the risk
characterization.  Submitters should provide information on release
locations, if known.  Any information on pollution controls used or that
could be used in association with the substitute (e.g., emissions
reduction technologies, wastewater treatment, and treatment of hazardous
waste) and the costs of such technology are also requested.

Replacement ratio for a chemical substitute.  EPA is requesting
information on the replacement ratio for a chemical substitute versus
the Class I or II substances being replaced.  For example, in the case
of a degreasing agent, how much more or less of the substitute chemical
is needed?  This will have an impact on the estimated incremental cost
and environmental effects associated with use of the substitute.

Required changes in technoloqy.  Detail on the changes in technology
needed to use the alternative is requested.  Such information should
include a description of whether the substitute can be used in existing
equipment-- with or without some retrofit--or in new equipment.  Data on
the cost (capital and operating) and estimated life of the technology
modifications should also be submitted.  These economic data are
essential to understanding the near-term potential of using an
alternative.

Cost of substitute.  EPA is requesting data on the expected average cost
of the alternative.  The cost of the substitute can be expressed, for
example, in terms of $/pound (for a chemical substitute) or as
incremental capital and operating costs associated with a retrofit or
new equipment.  In addition, information is needed on the expected
equipment lifetime for an alternative technology.  Other critical cost
considerations should be identified, as appropriate.  For example, it is
important to understand the incremental costs associated with losses or
gains in energy efficiency associated with use of a substitute relative
to current experience.

Availability of substitute.  EPA needs to understand the extent to which
a substitute is already commercially available or the expected date at
which it may become available.  The timing of availability is an
important factor in assessing the overall health and environmental
impacts of the substitute.

Anticipated market share.  Data on the anticipated near-term and
long-term (over the next five years) nationwide substitute sales (not
just those of the submitter) is requested.  This information can be
presented in several ways, for example:  a percentage of existing
nationwide use of Class I or Class II chemicals in a particular
application; number of units/products to be produced; or pounds of
substitute sold.  This information is required to assess the potential
impacts related to total consumption and environmental releases.

Applicable regulations under other environmental statutes.  The
submitter is requested to provide information on whether the
substitute(s) are regulated under other statutory authorities, in
particular the Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act, the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act, FIFRA, TSCA, and other titles under the
CAA.  EPA will evaluate substitutes under the SNAP program subject to
these existing regulatory constraints.

Information already submitted to EPA.  Individuals may have already
submitted information being requested in the SNAP program notice to EPA
as part of past regulatory and information-gathering activities.  If
such a situation exists, and to minimize reporting burden, the submitter
should provide the following information to help locate the data already
maintained at EPA: type of information submitted; the date of
submission; the name of the EPA office to which the data were sent;
description of the regulatory program; and a document-control number, if
assigned (e.g., a PMN number).  If the submitter cannot provide
references to data sent previously to EPA, he or she should include all
requested information in the SNAP notice.

Information already available in the literature.  If any of the data
needed to complete the SNAP program notice are available in the
literature, the submitter should provide EPA with references for such
information.  Failure to provide EPA with sufficient citation, however,
will delay review of the notice.  Additionally, submitters are
encouraged to provide copies of any literature to expedite review,
particularly if the citation is from a source not readily available to
EPA researchers.  Any references from sources in foreign languages
should be translated.

Additional information.  If critical new information becomes available
during the review period that may influence EPA’s evaluation of a
substitute, the submitter must notify EPA of the existence of such
information within 10 days of learning of such data.  The submitter must
also inform EPA of new studies underway, even if the results will not be
available within the review period.

2.   TSCA/SNAP Addendum Form Data Items:  Reference:  Sections
82.176(a), 82.178, 82.180(a)(5)

EPA has identified only a few additional data elements, beyond those
already required by the Premanufacture Notice (PMN) program that would
need to be included for review under the SNAP program. For this reason,
the added burden to respondent from the SNAP program, above that already
required by the PMN program, is very small.

The additional data elements in the TSCA/SNAP Addendum include:

-    The ozone-depletion potential,

-    The global-warming potential,

-    Explicit quantification of the cost of using the substitute and
information on when the substitute is expected to be available
(including the chemical replacement data, chemical cost data,
incremental equipment expenditures needed to use the substitute, and
information on the cost implications resulting from changes in energy
consumption), and

-    Documentation of testing results regarding the flammability of
substitutes that will be used in consumer applications.

If critical new information becomes available during the review period
that may influence EPA’s evaluation of a substitute, the submitter
must notify EPA of the existence of such information within 10 days of
learning of such data.  The submitter must also inform EPA of new
studies underway, even if the results will not be available within the
review period.

3.   Notification for Test Marketing Activity Data Items Reference:
Section 82.176(b)(5)

Uses of substitutes for the sole purpose of test marketing are exempt
from requirements for submitting a SNAP Information Notice or equivalent
until 90 days prior to the introduction of such substitutes for
full-scale commercial sale in interstate commerce.  Persons taking
advantage of this exemption are, however, required to notify EPA in
writing that they are conducting test marketing 30 days prior to the
commencement of such marketing.  Notification shall include the
following data items:

-    Name of the substitute

-    Volume used in the test marketing

-    Intended sector and end uses

-    Expected duration of the test marketing period

4.   Recordkeeping for Substitutes Acceptable Subject to Use Conditions
or Subject to Narrowed Use Limits Data Items Reference:  Section
82.180(b)(2) and (b)(3)

If a substitute is listed by EPA, in a decision on a SNAP information
notice, TSCA/SNAP addendum, or petition, as acceptable subject to
narrowed use limits, end users intending to use the substitute must
determine that other alternatives are not technically feasible.  For
some substitutes listed as acceptable subject to use conditions, the end
user needs to perform an assessment that other alternatives are not
technically feasible due to safety, performance, or technical reasons.
Such end users must document the results of their evaluation and retain
the results on file for the purpose of demonstrating compliance.  This
documentation shall include the following data items:

-    Descriptions of substitutes examined and rejected

-    Processes or products in which the substitute is needed

-    Reason for rejection of other alternatives, e.g., performance,
technical or safety standards

-    The anticipated date other substitutes will be available and
projected time for switching to other available substitutes.

Respondents are required to maintain these records for five years.  See
section 3(d) of this statement for the justification for this length of
time.

In addition, some substitutes subject to use conditions may have
specific recordkeeping requirements imposed through a use condition
(e.g., requirement to keep records of failure mode and effects analysis
when introducing certain automotive refrigerants, consistent with
requirements of industry standards).  Respondents are required to
maintain these records for three years.

5.   Recordkeeping for Small Volume Use Exemption Data Items Reference:
Section 82.176(b)(3)

Within the eight principal SNAP sectors, persons introducing a
substitute whose expected volume of use amounts to less than 10,000
pounds per year within a SNAP sector are exempt from notification
requirements.  Persons taking advantage of this exemption for small uses
must maintain documentation for each substitute describing how the
substitute meets this small use definition.  This documentation must
include the following data item:

-    Annual production and sales information by sector

Respondents are required to maintain these records for five years.  See
section 3(d) of this statement for the justification for this length of
time.

ii)  Respondent Activities

There are five types of respondent reporting and recordkeeping
activities required pursuant to Section 612 of the Act and the SNAP
regulations promulgated thereunder, 40 CFR Sections 82.170- 82.184:

Reporting: SNAP Information Notice/ Petition

This includes the following types of activities:

-    Pre-submittal contact with EPA.

-    Prepare and submit notice or petition to EPA.

-    Respond to EPA requests for additional information and/or notify
EPA of additional information as it becomes available.

Reporting: TSCA/SNAP Addendum

This includes the following types of activities:

-    Pre-submittal contact with EPA.

-    Prepare and submit form to EPA.

-    Respond to EPA requests for additional information and/or notify
EPA of additional information as it becomes available.

Reporting: Notification for Test Marketing Activity

-    Compile information, and prepare and submit letter to EPA with the
information.

Recordkeeping: Substitutes Acceptable Subject to Use Conditions or
Narrowed Use Limits

-    Assess other acceptable alternative substitutes.

-    Compile and prepare record of assessment or other records as
required by use conditions.

Recordkeeping: Small Volume Uses

-    Assess sector sales.

-    Compile and prepare record of sector sales.

 5.   The Information Collected - Agency Activities, Collection
Methodology and Information Management.

a)   Agency Activities

 EPA activities associated with reviewing SNAP submissions consist of
the following:

Pre-submittal contact with respondent

-    Send forms and guidance document to potential respondents.

  -    Answer questions regarding the completion of SNAP program forms
and the need to submit a SNAP notice.

Review and communication regarding submission

-    Assign tracking number to SNAP notice or petition.

-    Review SNAP notice or petition for sufficiency of information
provided, send letter of receipt, and notify submitter if additional
information is required.

-    Review requests for confidentiality and provide appropriate
protection.

-    Review SNAP notice or petition, and notify submitter of decision.

-    Review TSCA/SNAP Addendum in detail, coordinate with TSCA office,
and notify submitter of decision.

 -    Prepare and evaluate EPA-initiated changes to the SNAP
determinations.

Administrative operations

-  Maintain administrative tracking system for all submissions.

-  Maintain technical clearinghouse to help users identify acceptable
substitutes that are listed under SNAP.

-  Prepare and publish in the Federal Register periodic notices and
rulemakings to inform the public of any changes to the SNAP lists and of
all pending determinations.

b)   Collection Methodology and Management

EPA collects information through respondents’ submission of a SNAP
Information Notice, a TSCA/SNAP Addendum, or a petition.  In each case,
the collection methodology is the same.  EPA has 90 days from receipt of
a complete submission to respond to the filing, and EPA must publish its
decisions in these submissions in its periodic Federal Register notices
and rulemakings.

Initially, EPA reviews each submission for completeness within 15 days
of receipt of the submission.  If information is incomplete, the
submitter will be contacted for this information.  Thus, the 15 day
completeness review period begins on the date EPA receives a submission,
and it ends 15 days after the date of receipt.

The 90-day review period will not commence until EPA judges the
submission complete, although manufacturers of a new substitute may
introduce the substitute into interstate commerce 90 days after EPA
receives a submission if EPA has not already rendered an unacceptability
determination.  Once the 90-day review period has begun, EPA may
determine that additional data are necessary, or the submitter may
notify EPA of additional information which has become available and may
influence EPA’s evaluation of the proposed substitute.  In either
case, EPA may contact the submitter to explore extending or suspending
the review period, depending on the type of data and the stage of
review.  Thus, the 90-day review period begins on the date a complete
submission is received by EPA, and it ends 90 days thereafter, unless
EPA and the submitter have agreed to another date.

EPA will check data quality of each submission by its review of the data
in each submission.  EPA will use its existing systems for telephones
and computers to process each submission.  The public can get access to
non-confidential data in each submission by visiting the public docket
maintained in Washington, DC or by checking the online version of the
docket at   HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov"  www.regulations.gov
, docket number EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118.

There is a means for filing electronic SNAP submissions with EPA.  To
help respondents reduce the burden of gathering information to prepare a
SNAP submission, EPA has established an electronic clearinghouse of
useful information about the SNAP program, including updated lists of
acceptable and unacceptable substitutes.  In addition, the online docket
provides examples of submissions of various types.

c)   Small Entity Flexibility

Submission of a notice to EPA 90 days before introducing a new
substitute into commerce is required by statute, regardless of the size
of the submitter.  The information requested in the SNAP program is
necessary for EPA to evaluate the proposed substitute chemicals which
will be listed as acceptable or unacceptable, depending on the
evaluations.  The SNAP program has directed the burden on manufacturers
and formulators, rather than the end user, which greatly reduces the
potential burden on small entities.

Additionally, SNAP reporting requirements provide an exemption for
persons introducing a substitute whose expected volume of use amounts to
less than 10,000 pounds per year within a SNAP industrial sector.  This
exemption reduces the potential burden on small entities, although such
persons are subject to a recordkeeping requirement documenting their
qualification for this exemption.

d)   Collection Schedule

The SNAP regulations were promulgated March 18, 1994, and collection of
information as required therein commenced on that date.  EPA accepts and
reviews SNAP submissions as respondents provide them to EPA.
Information in the public docket on these submissions has been available
since submissions have been received.

6.    Estimating the Burden and Cost of Collection

a)    Estimating Respondent Burden

b)    Estimating Respondent Costs

The following tables (6A/B-1 through 6A/B-5) present estimates of annual
respondent burden hours and costs for each of the respondent activities
described in section 4(b)(ii), with explanations of the assumptions made
in each table.  All cost values are in 2010 dollars and reflect
inflation since the previous ICR.  Labor costs are from the Bureau of
Labor Statistics.

Exhibit 6A/B-1: SNAP Information Notice/Petition:  Annual Respondent
Burden and Cost (1)

The following table shows estimates of respondent burden hours and costs
for the first set of activities listed above in section 4(b)(ii).  In
making these estimates, relied on its experience in sixteen years of
implementing the SNAP program and its consultations with respondents,
and made the following assumptions:

- The number of inquiries about filing a SNAP Information Notice or
petition is 14 per year, of which 50% submit the filing.  The number of
CBI requests is 67% of the 7 submittals.  The number of filings for
which additional information is required is 67% of the 7 submittals.

- Labor cost of $68 represents an average hourly rate of pay, including
overhead and benefits, for a private company for labor that would be
classified as “technical” time for the bulk of the effort and
“clerical” time for a small part of the effort.

- Estimated start-up cost is based on the cost of required toxicological
data which, in 25% of SNAP filings, is a one-time event incurred for the
sole purpose of fulfilling SNAP requirements.  EPA estimates the cost of
such data ranges from $30,000 to $350,000, with more than half of
respondents incurring such costs in an amount equal to or less than
$75,000.  EPA multiplied a weighted average of these costs ($133,610) by
0.25 to get an estimated average start-up cost of $33,402 which
represents the cost distributed among all respondents.  EPA calculated
the annualized cost per respondent by using 20 years as the useful life
of the chemical for which data was collected and 7% as the discount
value.

- There is no annual operating and maintenance cost associated with this
reporting requirement.

Table 6A/B-1: SNAP INFORMATION NOTICE / PETITION

 	(A) Hours/

Year Resp.	(B) Labor

Cost (@ $68/

hr) per Resp.

per Year	(C) Annua-lized Start-up Cost per Resp.	(D) No. of Resp.
(E)Total Hrs/Year (All Resp.)

(A*D)	(F)

Total Annualized Cost per Year (All Resp.)

(C*D)	(G) Total

Labor Cost per Year (All Resp.)

(B*D)	(H) Total  Cost per Year (All Resp.)

(F+G)

a) Pre-submittal contact with EPA

Obtain form and guidance document from EPA	0.75	$51 	$0 	7	5.25	$0 	$357
	$357

Review form and guidance document from EPA	3	$204 	 	7	21	 	$1,428
$1,428

Identify chemical and applications	9	$612 	$0 	7	63	$0 	$4,284 	$4,284

b) Prepare and submit form to EPA

 	 	 	 	 	 	$0

Collect data for form	75	$5,100 	$3,153 	7	525	$22,071 	$35,700 	$57,771

Prepare notification form	12	$816 	$0 	7	84	$0 	$5,712 	$5,712

Prepare non-confidential version of form if CBI is declared	3	$204 	$0
5	15	$0 	$1,020 	$1,020

c)  Respond to EPA requests for add’l information and/or notify EPA of
add’l. info.

Communicate with EPA	7	$476 	$0 	5	35	$0 	$2,380 	$2,380

Collect data	58	$3,944 	$0 	5	290	$0 	$19,720 	$19,720

Prepare data to send to EPA	3	$204 	$0 	5	15	$0 	$1,020 	$1,020

                             Subtotals	170.75	$11,611 	$3,153 	varies
but 7 is most	1,053.3 	$22,071 	$71,621 	$93,692

Exhibit 6A/B-2: TSCA/SNAP ADDENDUM: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost
(2)

The following table shows estimates of respondent burden hours and costs
for the second set of activities listed above in section 4(b)(ii).  In
making these estimates, EPA relied on its experience in sixteen years of
implementing the SNAP program and its consultations with respondents,
and made the following assumptions:

- Three inquiries per year come in regarding a TSCA/SNAP Addendum.  EPA
receives three submittals per year.  Three CBI claims come from those 3
submittals.  Additional information is usually required from the
submitter.

- Labor cost of $68 represents an average hourly rate of pay, including
overhead and benefits, for a private company for labor that would be
classified as “technical” time for the bulk of the effort and
“clerical” time for a small part of the effort.

-There is no start-up or operating and maintenance cost associated with
the TSCA/SNAP Addendum.

Table 6A/B-2:  TSCA/SNAP Addendum

 	(A) Hours/

Year Resp.	(B) Labor

Cost (@ $68/

hr) per Resp.

per Year	(C) No. of Resp.	(D)Total Hrs/Year (All Resp.)

(A*C)	(E) Total

Labor Cost per Year (All Resp.)

(B*C)

a) Pre-submittal contact with EPA

Obtain form and guidance document from EPA	0.5	$34 	3	1.5	$102

Review form and guidance document from EPA	3	$204 	3	9	$612

Identify chemical and applications	0.5	$34 	3	1.5	$102

b) Prepare and submit form to EPA

Collect data for form	20	$1,360 	3	60	$4,080

Prepare notification form	5	$340 	3	15	$1,020

Prepare non-confidential version of form if CBI is declared	2	$136 	3	6
$408

c)  Respond to EPA requests for add’l information and/or notify EPA of
add’l. info.

Communicate with EPA	1	$68 	3	3	$204

Collect data	3	$204 	3	9	$612

Prepare data to send to EPA	1	$68 	3	3	$204

                             Subtotals	36	$2,448 	3	108.0 	$7,344

Exhibit 6A/B-3: Notification for Test Marketing Activity:  Annual
Respondent Burden and Cost (3)

The following table shows estimates of respondent burden hours and costs
for the third set of activities listed above in section 4(b)(ii).  In
making these estimates, EPA relied on its experience in sixteen years of
implementing the SNAP program and its consultations with respondents,
and made the following assumptions:

- The number of notifications for test marketing activity is one per
year, and the number of hours per notification is two.

- Labor cost of $68 represents an average hourly rate of pay, including
overhead and benefits, for a private company for labor that would be
classified as “technical” time for the bulk of the effort and
“clerical” time for a small part of the effort.

- There is no start-up or operating and maintenance cost associated with
the notification.

Table 6A/B-3:  Notification for Test Marketing Activity

 	(A) Hours/

Year Resp.	(B) Labor

Cost (@ $68/

hr) per Resp.

per Year	(C) No. of Resp.	(D)Total Hrs/Year (All Resp.)

(A*C)	(E) Total

Labor Cost per Year (All Resp.)

(B*C)

a) Compile information and prepare letter	2	$136 	1	2	$136

Subtotal	2	$136 	1	2	$136

Exhibit 6A/B-4: Recordkeeping for Substitutes Acceptable Subject to Use
Conditions or Narrowed Used Limits:  Annual Respondent Burden and Cost
(4)

The following table shows estimates of respondent burden hours and costs
for the fourth set of activities listed above in section 4(b)(ii).  In
making these estimates, EPA relied on its experience in sixteen years of
implementing the SNAP program and its consultations with respondents,
and made the following assumptions:

- The number of recordkeeping collections is 200 per year.  Each
collection is a one-time occurrence.  Users of restricted alternatives
may periodically reevaluate alternatives available.

- Labor cost of $68 represents an average hourly rate of pay, including
overhead and benefits, for a private company for labor that would be
classified as “technical” time for the bulk of the effort and
“clerical” time for a small part of the effort.

- There is no start-up cost associated with the recordkeeping
collection.

-  Annual operating and maintenance cost represents an estimate of cost
of storage space for keeping the records.

Table 6A/B-4: Recordkeeping For Substitutes Acceptable Subject to Use
Conditions or Narrowed Used Limits

 	(A) Hours/

Year Resp.	(B) Labor

Cost (@ $68/

hr) per Resp.

per Year	(C) Annua-lized O&M Cost per Resp.	(D) No. of Resp.	(E)Total
Hrs/Year (All Resp.)

(A*D)	(F)

Total Annualized Cost per Year (All Resp.)

(C*D)	(G) Total

Labor Cost per Year (All Resp.)

(B*D)	(H) Total  Cost per Year (All Resp.)

(F+G)

a) Assessment of other acceptable alternatives	25	$1,700 	$0 	200	5,000
$0 	$340,000 	$340,000

b) Compile information and prepare recordkeeping	2	$136 	$1 	200	400
$200 	$27,200 	$27,400

Subtotal	27	$1,836 	$1 	200	5,400	$200 	$367,200 	$367,400

Exhibit 6A/B-5: Recordkeeping for Small Volume Uses:  Annual Respondent
Burden and Cost (5)

The following table shows estimates of respondent burden hours and costs
for the fifth set of activities listed above in section 4(b)(ii).  In
making these estimates, EPA relied on its experience in sixteen years of
implementing the SNAP program and its consultations with respondents,
and made the following assumptions:

- The number of recordkeeping collections is 10 per year, and each
collection is a one-time occurrence.

- Labor cost of $68 represents an average hourly rate of pay, including
overhead and benefits, for a private company for labor that would be
classified as “technical” time for the bulk of the effort and
“clerical” time for a small part of the effort.

- There is no start-up cost associated with the recordkeeping
collection.

- Annual operating and maintenance cost represents an estimate of cost
of storage space, filing materials and other associated, non-labor costs
for keeping the records.

Table 6A/B-5:  Recordkeeping for Small Volume Uses:  Annual Respondent
Burden and Cost

 	(A) Hours/

Year Resp.	(B) Labor

Cost (@ $68/

hr) per Resp.

per Year	(C) Annua-lized O&M Cost per Resp.	(D) No. of Resp.	(E)Total
Hrs/Year (All Resp.)

(A*D)	(F)

Total Annualized Cost per Year (All Resp.)

(C*D)	(G) Total

Labor Cost per Year (All Resp.)

(B*D)	(H) Total Cost per Year (All Resp.)

(F+G)

a) Assessment of sector sales	10	$680 	$0 	10	100	$0 	$6,800 	$6,800

b) Compile information and prepare recordkeeping	2	$136 	$1 	10	20	$10
$1,360 	$1,370

Subtotal	12	$816 	$1 	10	120	$10 	$8,160 	$8,170

c)    Estimating Agency Burden and Costs

Exhibit 6C-1: Annual Agency Burden and Costs

The following table shows estimates of EPA burden hours and costs
(including the cost of contractor services) for the activities listed in
section 5 above.  In making these estimates, EPA made the following
assumptions:

- The number of occurrences is based on the number of inquiries and
submittals by respondents estimated above in tables 6A-1 and 6A-2.

- The number of EPA-initiated changes in SNAP determinations is
estimated to be two per year.

- The number of hours per detailed review of a TSCA/SNAP Addendum
assumes 60 hours per form.

- Labor cost is based on the annual 2010 salary for a GS 12/ Step 2
employee ($77,368), which is divided by 2,080 hours, the number of hours
in a federal work year  (resulting in an hourly rate of $37.20), then
multiplied by 1.6, the standard government benefits multiplication
factor (resulting in a final hourly rate of $59.52).

- The cost of contractor services in the two circumstances noted in the
chart is based on a percentage of the total annual cost to SPD of the
contractor’s charges under the respective 2010 contracts.  The
percentage in each case represents an estimate of the time spent by the
contractor on SNAP issues as distinguished from other SPD issues not
related to SNAP.  The hourly rate noted in each case represents the
average rate charged per hour under these contracts.

- Total Agency costs have decreased.  This is primarily due to a
substantial decrease in the cost of contractor services for
administrative support of the SNAP program.  EPA staff complete an
increasing proportion of clearinghouse maintenance and updates, rather
than using contractor services.

 Table 6C1: EPA burden hours and costs

 	No. of Occur-rences	No. of Hours per Occur-rence	Total no. of Hours
per Year	Labor Cost (@ $59.52/hr) per Year	Cost of Contract Services per
Year	Total Cost per Year

1) Pre-submittal contact w/ respondent

Send forms/ guidance to potential submitters	14	0.1	1.4	$83.33 	   n/a
$83

Answer questions re potential submissions	14	3	42	$2,499.84 	   n/a
$2,500

2) Review & communication re submission

Assign tracking number to submission	7	0.5	3.5	$208.32 	   n/a	$208

Review submission, send receipt, notify if add’l info required	7	2	14
$833.28 	   n/a	$833

Review CBI requests and protect as appropriate	5	4	20	$1,190.40 	   n/a
$1,190

Review submission in detail and notify submitter of decision	7	120	840
$49,996.80 	   n/a	$49,997

Contractor assistance in reviewing submissions (@ $132/per hr)	    n/a
  n/a	2325	n/a	$306,900 	$306,900

Review TSCA/SNAP Addendum in detail and notify submitter of decision	3
60	180	$10,713.60 	   n/a	$10,714

Prepare and evaluate EPA-initiated changes to determinations	2	40	80
$4,761.60 	   n/a	$4,762

3) Administrative operations

Maintain system of tracking submissions	on-going	120	120	$7,142.40
n/a	$7,142

Maintain clearinghouse to help users	on-going	150	150	$8,928.00 	    n/a
$8,928

Contractor assistance for clearinghouse(@ $99/per hr)	   n/a	     n/a	25
n/a	$2,475 	$2,475

Prepare FR notices and rule-makings re changes to SNAP lists	5	80	400
$23,808.00 	    n/a	$23,808

Totals	varies	varies	4200.9	$250,037.57 	$309,375 	$419,541

d)    Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs  See
the tables in section 6(a) and (b) for these estimates.

Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables

Exhibit 6E-1:  Information Collection Activity: Total Estimated
Respondent Burden and Cost Summary

Table 6E1:  Total Estimated Respondent Burden and Cost Summary

 	No. of Resp-ondents per year	No. of Activities per year	Total Hours
per Year	Total Labor Cost per Year @$68	Total Annua-lized Start-up Costs
Total Annua-lized O&M Costs	Total Annua-lized Costs	Total Costs

SNAP Information Notice/ Petition	7	7	1,053	$71,621 	$22,071 	$0
$22,071 	$93,692

TSCA/SNAP Addendum	3	3	108.0 	$7,344 	$0 	$0 	$0 	$7,344

Notification for test marketing activity	1	1	2	$136 	$0 	$0 	$0 	$136

Recordkeeping for Substitutes Acceptable Subject to Use Conditions or
Limits	200	200	5,400	$367,200 	$0 	$200 	$200 	$367,400

Recordkeeping for Small Volume Uses	10	10	120	$8,160 	$0 	$10 	$10
$8,170

                 Totals	221	221	6,683	$454,461 	$22,071 	$210 	$22,281
$476,742

These numbers are from the subtotals of tables in 6(a) and 6(b), and are
used to complete items 13 and 14 in Form 83-1.

Exhibit 6E-2: Total Estimated Agency Burden and Cost Summary

Table 6E2:  Total Estimated Agency Burden and Cost Summary

 	No. of Respondents	No. of Activities	Total Hours per Year 	Total Govt
Labor Hours per Year	Total Annual Govt Labor Cost @$59.52	Cost of
Contract Services per Year	Total Cost per Year

Pre-submittal contact with respondents	14	14	43.4	43.4	$2,583 	 $
     -   	$2,583

Review and communicate re submission	7	7	3,463	1,138	$67,704 	$306,900
$374,604

Administrative operations	varies	varies	695	670	$39,878 	$2,475 	$42,353

Totals	varies	varies	4,200.9	1,851	$110,166 	 $309,375 	$419,541

f)    Reasons for Change in Burden

The total number of respondent burden hours requested annually (Exhibit
6E-1) for this information collection has decreased from 8,204 hours in
2007 to 6,683 hours in 2010.  The SNAP burden hours have been decreasing
since 2000, starting at 10,363 hours and decreasing to 8,972 hours in
2004, 8,204 hours in 2007, and 6,683 hours in 2010.   This is due to
changes in EPA’s estimates of the burden hours and number of
respondents fulfilling reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

The development of new substitutes caused the number of persons filing a
SNAP Information Notice or TSCA/SNAP Addendum to increase slightly, but
also resulted in fewer respondents keeping records for alternatives that
are subject to use conditions or narrowed use limits. In addition,
respondents filing a SNAP Information Notice reported a decrease in
total annual burden of hours when collecting data to complete the form
and when responding to requests for additional information.  This
decrease may be attributable to increased respondent familiarity with
EPA’s forms, more examples in the public record for respondents to
research and use in preparing responses, and general increased
availability of computer software and information via the Internet.

g)    Burden Statement

Exhibits 6A/B-1 through 6A/B-5 present the average annual respondent
burden for each person subject to SNAP reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.  For persons filing a SNAP Information Notice or petition,
the reporting burden is estimated to average 171 hours per year.  For
persons filing a TSCA/SNAP Addendum, the reporting burden is estimated
to average 36 hours per year.  For persons filing a notification of test
marketing activity, the reporting burden is estimated to average 2 hours
per year.  For persons keeping records of use of a substitute subject to
use conditions or narrowed use limits, the recordkeeping burden is
estimated to average 27 hours per year.  For persons keeping records of
a small volume use, the recordkeeping burden is estimated to average 12
hours per year.

Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by
persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency.  This includes the time needed
to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to
be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or
otherwise disclose the information.  An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
The OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations are listed in 40 CFR
Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.

Appendices

A-    Draft FR notice announcing request for ICR renewal

B-    Text of Section 612 of the Clean Air Act as amended in1990

C-    Text of SNAP Regulations, 40 CFR Part 82, Subpart G

D-    SNAP Information Notice (EPA Form 1265-07)

E-    TSCA/SNAP Addendum (EPA Form 1265-07)

F-    Instructions for the SNAP Program Information Notice and TSCA/SNAP
Addendum (EPA

       Form 1265-93(1)

ഄ̍഍ഄ഍഍

഍

഍഍


[Federal Register: April 10, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 70)]
[Notices]
[Page 19496-19497]
[DOCID:fr10ap08-40]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13135-000]

City of Watervliet; Notice of Application Accepted for Filing and
Soliciting Comments, Protests, and Motions To Intervene

April 3, 2008.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Preliminary Permit.
    b. Project No.: 13135-000.
    c. Date filed: March 3, 2008.
    d. Applicant: City of Watervliet.
    e. Name and Location of Project: The proposed Delta Dam
Hydroelectric Project would be located at Delta Dam on the Mohawk River
in Oneida County, New York.
    f. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    g. Applicant contact: Mr. Mark Gleason, General Manager, City of
Watervliet, City Hall, Watervliet, NY 12189,<PHONE_NUMBER> x122.
    h. FERC Contact: Tom Papsidero,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. Deadline for filing comments, protests, and motions to
intervene: 60 days from the issuance date of this notice.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426. Comments, protests and
interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of
paper; see 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the
Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission
strongly encourages electronic filings. Please include the project
number (P-13135-000) on any comments or motions filed.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person in the official service list for the
project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    j. Description of Existing Facilities and Proposed Project: The
proposed Delta Dam Project would consist of: (1) The existing 1,016-
foot-long, 76-foot-high Delta dam, owned by the New York State Canal
Corporation, (2) an existing impoundment having a surface area of 2,700
acres and a storage capacity of 63,200 acre-feet and normal water
surface elevation of 550 feet mean sea level, (3) a proposed powerhouse
containing two generating units with a total installed capacity of 5.0
megawatts, (4) a proposed 1,000-foot-long, 13.2-kilovolt underground
generator lead, and (5) appurtenant facilities. The project would have
an annual generation of 16.1 GWh.
    k. Location of Applications: A copy of the application is available
for inspection and reproduction at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's website at http://
www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is
also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item g
above.
    l. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    m. Competing Preliminary Permit--Anyone desiring to file a
competing application for preliminary permit for a proposed project
must submit the competing application itself, or a notice of intent to
file such an application, to

the Commission on or before the specified comment date for the
particular application (see 18 CFR 4.36). Submission of a timely notice
of intent allows an interested person to file the competing preliminary
permit application no later than 30 days after the specified comment
date for the particular application. A competing preliminary permit
application must conform with 18 CFR 4.30 and 4.36.
    n. Competing Development Application--Any qualified development
applicant desiring to file a competing development application must
submit to the Commission, on or before a specified comment date for the
particular application, either a competing development application or a
notice of intent to file such an application. Submission of a timely
notice of intent to file a development application allows an interested
person to file the competing application no later than 120 days after
the specified comment date for the particular application. A competing
license application must conform with 18 CFR 4.30 and 4.36.
    o. Notice of Intent--A notice of intent must specify the exact
name, business address, and telephone number of the prospective
applicant, and must include an unequivocal statement of intent to
submit, if such an application may be filed, either a preliminary
permit application or a development application (specify which type of
application). A notice of intent must be served on the applicant(s)
named in this public notice.
    p. Proposed Scope of Studies under Permit--A preliminary permit, if
issued, does not authorize construction. The term of the proposed
preliminary permit would be 36 months. The work proposed under the
preliminary permit would include economic analysis, preparation of
preliminary engineering plans, and a study of environmental impacts.
Based on the results of these studies, the Applicant would decide
whether to proceed with the preparation of a development application to
construct and operate the project.
    q. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene--Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    r. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents--Any filings must
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``NOTICE OF INTENT
TO FILE COMPETING APPLICATION'', ``COMPETING APPLICATION'',
``PROTEST'', or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable, and the Project
Number of the particular application to which the filing refers. Any of
the above-named documents must be filed by providing the original and
the number of copies provided by the Commission's regulations to: The
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. An additional copy must be sent to Director,
Division of Hydropower Administration and Compliance, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, at the above-mentioned address. A copy of any
notice of intent, competing application or motion to intervene must
also be served upon each representative of the Applicant specified in
the particular application.
    s. Agency Comments--Federal, state, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-7603 Filed 4-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: February 23, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 36)]
[Notices]
[Page 9391-9392]
[DOCID:fr23fe06-100]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-53319; File No. SR-Amex-2006-13]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Extend the Deadline for Implementation of the ANTE System

February 15, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on February 6, 2006, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Exchange'' or
``Amex'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. Amex has
designated this proposal as non-controversial under Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\
which renders the proposed rule change effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Amex Rule 900--ANTE to extend the
deadline for implementation of the Amex New Trading Environment trading
platform (the ``ANTE System'' or ``ANTE'') for all option classes from
December 31, 2005, to June 30, 2006. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on Amex's Web site (http://www.amex.com), at Amex's

principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    On May 20, 2004, the Commission approved Amex's proposal to
implement a new options trading platform known as ANTE.\5\ On May 25,
2004, Amex began rolling out the ANTE System on its trading floor on a
specialist's post-by-specialist's post basis. At that time it was
anticipated the roll-out would be completed by the end of the second
quarter of 2005. The implementation date for the full roll-out of the
ANTE System was subsequently extended to December 31, 2005.\6\ Amex has
rolled out the ANTE System to all its option classes except one--the
Nasdaq 100 Index (``NDX''). NDX has the largest notional value of any
option class, with average option premiums of $40. The specialist for
this product is concerned that the theoretical price calculator
provided by the ANTE System may not accurately price the options on
this index. The specialist has installed its own theoretical index
price calculator, which currently calculates prices for the firm's
other options products, including the Mini Nasdaq Index (MNX), an index
valued at one-tenth the value of NDX. The specialist for NDX has sought
more time to gain experience using its proprietary price calculator
before it moves NDX onto the ANTE System. The Exchange expects that NDX
will be moved onto the ANTE System by June 30, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49747, 69 FR 30344
(May 27, 2004) (File No. SR-Amex-2003-89).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52984 (December 20,
2005), 70 FR 76472 (December 27, 2005) (File No. SR-Amex-2005-123).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Amex is now proposing to revise its implementation schedule to
provide that all option classes traded by the Exchange will be on the
ANTE System by June 30, 2006. Maintaining two platforms for options
trading--the legacy systems (AODB, the Amex Options Display Book;
XTOPS, Amex's theoretical price calculator; and Auto-Ex) and ANTE--is
costly. In a separate filing submitted February 6, 2006, for immediate
effectiveness pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\7\ the
Exchange is proposing to impose a Technology Assessment Fee on members
for the continued use of its legacy options trading systems.\8\ The
intent of this assessment is to recover some of the costs incurred for
maintaining the legacy systems and to provide an additional incentive
to the NDX specialist to transition NDX to the ANTE System as soon as
possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \8\ See File No. SR-Amex-2006-12, notice of which the Commission
is separately publishing for comment today (Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 53318).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \9\ in general and furthers the objectives
of Section 6(b)(5) \10\ in particular in that it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest; and is not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, and
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not

necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \12\
thereunder because it (i) Does not significantly affect the protection
of investors or the public interest; (ii) does not impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) does not become operative
for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, provided that the self-regulatory
organization has given the Commission written notice of its intent to
file the proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the
filing date of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the five-day
pre-filing requirement and the 30-day operative delay of Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) so that the proposed rule change may become effective
immediately.\13\ The Commission believes that waiving the pre-filing
requirement and the operative delay is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. Therefore, the Commission has
determined to waive the pre-filing requirement and the operative delay
and allow the proposed rule change to become operative immediately.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ The Exchange gave the Commission written notice of its
intent to file the proposed rule change by notice on January 14,
2005.
    \14\ For purposes only of waiving the operative delay of this
proposal, the Commission notes that it has considered the proposed
rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File No. SR-Amex-2006-13 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2006-13. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commissions Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-Amex-2006-13 and should be submitted on or before March
16, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-1653 Filed 2-22-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 227 (Monday, November 26, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 60550]
[FR Doc No: 2018-25685]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Form F-80; SEC File No. 270-357, OMB Control No. 3235-0404.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    Form F-80 (17 CFR 239.41) is a registration form used by large,
publicly-traded Canadian issuers to register securities that will be
offered in a business combination, exchange offer or other
reorganization requiring the vote of shareholders of the participating
companies. The information collected is intended to make available
material information upon which shareholders and investors can make
informed voting and investment decisions. Form F-80 takes approximately
2 hours per response and is filed by approximately 4 issuers for a
total annual burden of 8 hours (2 hours per response x 4 responses).
The estimated burden of 2 hours per response was based upon the amount
of time necessary to compile the registration statement using the
existing Canadian prospectus plus any additional information required
by the Commission.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collections of information
on respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    Please direct your written comment to Charles Riddle, Acting
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o Candace Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an
email to: [email protected].

    Dated: November 20, 2018.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-25685 Filed 11-23-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: November 25, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 226)]
[Notices]
[Page 61677-61678]
[DOCID:fr25no09-65]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0917; FRL-8984-9]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Standards for Pesticide
Containers and Containment; EPA ICR No. 1632.03, OMB Control No. 2070-
0133

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an
existing approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below,
describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated
burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before December 28,
2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPP-
2008-0917, to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by mail--Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB by mail to:
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cameo Smoot, Field and External
Affairs Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, 7506P, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On February 25, 2009 (74 FR 8537), EPA sought comments on this
ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any
additional comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB
within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0917, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the OPP Regulatory
Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S.
Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. The hours of operation of this Docket
Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The Docket telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Use
EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA
receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, confidential business information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about the electronic docket, go to http://
www.regulations.gov.
    Title: Standards for Pesticide Containers and Containment.
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1632.03, OMB Control No. 2070-0133.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2009.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: This information collection request covers the
information collection activities associated with the container design
and residue removal requirements and containment structure
requirements. With respect to the container design and residue removal
requirements, the information collection activities are associated with
the requirement that businesses subject to the container regulations
(pesticide registrants) and repackaging regulations (pesticide
registrants and refillers) maintain records of test data, cleaning
procedures, certain data when a container is refilled, and other
supporting information. These records are subject to both call-in by
EPA and on-site inspection by EPA and its representatives. EPA has not
established a regular schedule for the collection of these records, and
there is no reporting. With respect to the containment structure
requirements, the information collection activities are associated with
the requirement that businesses subject to the containment structure
regulations maintain records of the: (1) Monthly inspection and
maintenance of each containment structure and all stationary bulk
containers; (2) duration over which non-stationary bulk containers
holding pesticide and not protected by a secondary containment unit
remain at the same location; and (3) construction date of the
containment structure. The businesses subject to the containment
structure regulations include agrichemical retailers and refilling
establishments, custom blenders and commercial applicators of
agricultural pesticides. The records have to be maintained by the
owners and operators of such businesses. There is no regular schedule
for the collection of either of these records, nor does EPA anticipate
a call-in of records at some future date. Instead, the records would be
available to inspectors to ensure that businesses are in compliance
with containment requirements. These inspections are

generally conducted by the states, who enforce FIFRA regulations
through cooperative agreements with EPA.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 7.4
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by
this ICR include pesticide registrants and businesses who formulate
pesticide products or pesticide formulation intermediates (NAICS code
325320), farm supply wholesalers (NAICS code 422910), swimming pool
applicators (classified under NAICS codes 561790, 453998, and 235990),
and agricultural (aerial and ground) commercial applicators (classified
under NAICS code 115112).
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 23,586. This includes 1,804
registrant facilities, 16,795 agricultural pesticide refillers, 322
swimming pool supply companies, and 4,665 facilities requiring
secondary containment.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion. There is no regular reporting
involved. This ICR only involves recordkeeping requirements.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 174,550.5 hours. This includes
139,563 hours for container design and residue removal requirements and
34,987.5 hours for containment structure requirements.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $6,124,953. This includes $4,902,723
for container design and residue removal requirements and $1,222,230
for containment structure requirements.
    Changes in the Estimates: The renewal of this ICR will result in an
overall increase of 122,493.5 hours in the total estimated respondent
burden identified in the currently approved ICR. When the information
collection associated with this ICR was approved in 2006, the burden
hours were adjusted to reflect only the burden associated with initial
rule familiarization and state requests to use their containment
regulations in lieu of Federal regulations--a total of 52,057 hours.
These were the only burdens that were imposed by the pesticide
container and containment regulations during the course of that
approval. EPA was instructed to revise the estimates, upon
resubmission, to reflect the burden imposed in 2009 and beyond because
of compliance with the requirements.

    Dated: November 18, 2009.
John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E9-28259 Filed 11-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P