[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 112 (Wednesday, June 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33638-33639]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13587]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Information Collection Activities: Submission for the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Request for Comment

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of information collection and
solicitation of public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35), this notice announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below will be submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. The ICR describes the
nature of the information collection and its expected burden. A Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting public comments
on the following information collection was published on June 6, 2013
(Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 109/pp. 34152-34154).

DATES: Submit comments to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on
or before July 11, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Block at the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Behavioral Safety Research
(NTI-131), W46-499, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Block's phone number is 202-366-
6401 and his email address is<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2127-0645.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement with change.
    Title: Motor Vehicle Occupant Safety Survey (MVOSS).
    Form No.: NHTSA Form 1020A and NHTSA Form 1020B.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Respondents: NHTSA proposes to conduct the Motor Vehicle Occupant
Safety Survey (MVOSS) among national probability samples of adults age
16 and older. The survey is composed of two questionnaires, each of
which will be administered to independently drawn samples of
respondents. The survey will use Web as the primary response mode, with
mail and telephone as alternative response modes. Prior to the survey,
there will be usability tests of each of the three response modes to
assess the interface between survey and respondent. The usability tests
will be conducted with a convenience sample of adults. There also will
be a pilot test of the survey. The pilot test will be conducted with a
sample of randomly selected people age 16 and older. Full
administration of the survey will be conducted with probability-based
samples of people ages 16 and older drawn from an address-based
sampling (ABS) frame.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: There will be 60 respondents
participating in the usability tests. The pilot test will have a total
drawn sample of 3,000. The response rate it will achieve is unknown,
but for purposes of burden estimation this project will assume a
response rate upper limit of 50%. The estimated total number of
respondents is therefore 1,500. For the full administration of the
survey, there will be two versions of the questionnaire, one focusing
on seat belts and the other focusing on child restraint use. Sufficient
sample will be drawn to complete 6,000 interviews per questionnaire,
for a total of 12,000 completed interviews.
    Estimated Time per Response: Average duration per respondent for
the usability tests will be two hours. Average duration per respondent
for both the pilot test and the full administration of the survey will
be 15 minutes.
    Total Estimated Annual Burden Hours: The total estimated annual
burden for the usability tests is 60 subjects x 2 hours = 120 hours.
The total estimated annual burden for the pilot test is 3,000 sample x
50% response rate x 15 minutes = 375 hours. The total estimated annual
burden for the full administration of the survey is 6,000 respondents x
2 questionnaires x 15 minutes = 3,000 hours. The total estimated annual
burden for all three information collections combined is 3,495 hours.
    Frequency of Collection: Respondents will participate a single time
in the usability tests, pilot test, or survey. They will not
participate in more than one of these forms of information collection.
The usability tests, pilot test, and survey will be conducted a single
time.
    Abstract: The Motor Vehicle Occupant Safety Survey (MVOSS) is
conducted on a periodic basis by the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration to obtain a status report on attitudes, knowledge, and
behavior related to motor vehicle occupant protection. It was last
conducted in 2007. The survey is composed of two questionnaires, each
administered to a randomly selected sample of approximately 6,000
persons age 16 and older. One questionnaire focuses on seat belt issues
while the other focuses on child restraint use. Additional topics
addressed by the survey include air bags, emergency medical services,
wireless phone use in motor vehicles, and crash injury experience. The
proposed survey is the seventh in the MVOSS series, which began in
1994. The proposed MVOSS will collect data on topics included in the
preceding surveys in order to monitor change over time in the use of
occupant protection devices and in attitudes and knowledge related to
motor vehicle occupant safety. The survey will also include new
questions that address emergent issues.
    The proposed MVOSS will use a multi-mode approach that employs Web
as the primary response mode, with the online technology serving to
reduce length and minimize recording errors. Mail and telephone will
serve as alternative response modes for respondents that choose not to
participate on-line. The telephone interviewers will use computer-
assisted telephone interviewing (CATI). A Spanish language translation
of the questionnaires, and bilingual interviewers to conduct the
telephone interviews, will be used to minimize language barriers to
participation.
    The multi-mode approach is a major change in methodology from
previous administrations of the MVOSS, as will be the use of an
address-based sampling (ABS) frame as opposed to the telephone sampling
frames used during previous administrations of the MVOSS. Therefore,
the full administration of the survey will be preceded by usability
tests to assess the interface between survey and respondents, and a
pilot test to assess the methods for each of the response modes used in
the survey.

ADDRESSES: Send comments regarding the burden estimate, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street
NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk

Officer for Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comments Are Invited On: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department of Transportation, including whether the information
will have practical utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate
of the burden of the proposed information collection; ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected;
and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology. A comment to OMB is most
effective if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication of this
notice.

    Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 5, 2014.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2014-13587 Filed 6-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register: September 21, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 182)]
[Notices]
[Page 55441-55443]
[DOCID:fr21se05-134]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-52436; File No. SR-PCX-2005-53]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Change and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto by the Pacific Exchange, Inc.
To Create a New Order Type--Passive Liquidity Orders--for Use in the
ArcaEx Trading Facility of the PCX

September 14, 2005.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 15, 2005, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (``PCX'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the PCX. On June 3, 2005, the PCX filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\3\ On August 26, 2005, the
PCX filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change.\4\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Amendment No. 1, which replaced the original filing, made
technical and clarifying changes to the proposed rule change.
    \4\ Amendment No. 2, which replaced Amendment No. 1, clarified
the execution priority of Passive Liquidity orders in PCXE Rule
7.37, as compared to other orders that are part of the Display Order
Process and the Working Order Processes, and as compared to Directed
Fills in the Display Order Process. In addition, Amendment No. 2
made other technical and clarifying changes to the proposed rule
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The PCX, through its wholly-owned subsidiary PCX Equities, Inc.
(``PCXE''), proposes to amend its rules governing the Archipelago
Exchange (``ArcaEx''), the equities trading facility of PCXE. With this
filing, the Exchange proposes to add one new order type, the Passive
Liquidity Order (``PL Order''). The changes described in this rule
proposal would add new Rule 7.31(h)(4) and amend existing Rule 7.37(b).
    The text of the proposed rule change, as amended, appears below.
Additions are in italics. Deleted items are in brackets.
* * * * *

Rule 7
Equities Trading
    Rule 7.31(a)-(g)--No Change
    (h) Working Order. Any order with a conditional or undisplayed
price and/or size designated as a ``Working Order'' by the Corporation,
including, without limitation:
    (1)-(3)--No Change
    (4) Passive Liquidity Order. An order to buy or sell a stated
amount of a security at a specified, undisplayed price. Passive
Liquidity Orders will be executed in the Working Order Process after
all other Working Orders except undisplayed discretionary order
interest. Passive Liquidity Orders with a price superior to that of
Directed Fills will have price priority and will execute ahead of
inferior priced Directed Fills in the Directed Order Process. Passive
Liquidity Orders with a price superior to that of displayed orders will
have price priority and will execute ahead of inferior priced displayed
orders in the Display Order Process.
* * * * *
    Rule 7.37
    (a) Step 1: Directed Order Process. During Core Trading Hours only,
orders may be matched and executed in the Directed Order Process as
follows:
    (1) If a User submits a marketable Directed Order to the
Archipelago Exchange and the User's designated Market Maker has a
standing instruction for a Directed Fill to the Archipelago Exchange,
the Directed Order shall be executed against the Directed Fill of the
designated Market Maker, unless there is a Passive Liquidity Order as
defined in PCXE Rule 7.31(h) with a price superior to that of the
Directed Fill, in which case the Passive Liquidity Order will have
price priority and will execute ahead of inferior priced Directed Fills
in the Directed Order Process.
    (2)-(4)--No Change.
    (b) If an incoming marketable order has not been executed in its
entirety pursuant to paragraph (a) of this Rule, any remaining part of
the order shall be routed to the Display Order Process.
    (1) Step 2: Display Order Process.
    (A) An incoming marketable order shall first attempt to be matched
for execution against orders in the Display Order Process at the
display price of the resident order for the total amount of stock
available at that price or for the size of the incoming order,
whichever is smaller. Passive Liquidity Orders as defined in PCXE Rule
7.31(h) with a price superior to that of displayed orders will have
price priority and will execute ahead of inferior priced displayed
orders in the Display Order Process. For the purposes of this
subsection, the size of an incoming Reserve Order includes the
displayed and reserve size, and the size of the portion of the Reserve
Order resident in the Display Order Process is equal to its displayed
size. If the incoming marketable order has not been executed in its
entirety, the remaining part of the order shall be routed to the
Working Order Process.
    (B)--No Change.
    Rule 7.37(b)(2)
    (2) Step 3: Working Order Process.
    (A) An incoming marketable order shall be matched for execution
against orders in the Working Order Process in the following manner:
    (i) An incoming marketable order shall be matched against orders
within the Working Order Process in the order of their ranking, at the
price of the displayed portion (or in the case of an All-or-None Order,
at the limit price or in the case of a Passive Liquidity Order, at its
price), for the total amount of stock available at that price or for
the size of the incoming order, whichever is smaller.
    Rule 7.37(b)(2)(A)(ii)-(d)--No Change.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the PCX included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The PCX has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    As part of its continuing efforts to enhance participation on the
ArcaEx facility, the Exchange proposes to add a new order type for use
by Users.\5\ The new order type, the PL Order, is an order to buy or
sell a stated amount of a security at a specified, undisplayed price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See PCXE Rule 1.1(yy) for the definition of ``User.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    PL Order Type Features
    A PL Order would be an order to buy or sell a stated amount of a
security at a specified, undisplayed price. PL Orders must be entered
with a volume of at least 200 shares and will only be permitted in
round lot denominations. ArcaEx pegging, reserve, and discretionary
functionality will not be available to modify PL Orders.\6\ PL Orders
will not route out of ArcaEx to other market centers and will not
execute against incoming orders sent via the Intermarket Trading
System.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ More specifically, the pegging functionality will not be
available for PL Orders in that the Passive Liquidity Order price
will not automatically track the NBBO. See PCXE Rule 7.31(cc).
Further, reserve functionality, meaning undisplayed size, and
discretionary functionality, meaning undisplayed prices, will not be
available for PL Orders since the Passive Liquidity Order price and
size are undisplayed by definition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    PL Order Execution Priority in ArcaEx
    ArcaEx maintains an electronic file of orders called the Arca
book.\7\ The Arca book is divided into three components: the Display
Order Process, the Working Order Process and the Tracking Order
Process.\8\ Arca ranks and maintains limit orders in the Arca book
according to price/time priority and generally affords priority to
displayed orders in the Display Process and prices over undisplayed
orders in the Working Order Process, sizes and prices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See PCXE Rule 1.1(a).
    \8\ The Directed Order Process, as set forth in PCXE Rule 7.37,
precedes the Display, Working, and Tracking Order Processes, but is
not operable at this time on ArcaEx. ArcaEx intends to implement a
new Directed Process in a future filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    PL Orders would be executed in the Working Order Process after all
other orders including reserve orders and the display portion of
discretionary orders at a particular price level. PL Orders would,
however, take precedence over undisplayed discretionary order interest.
PL Orders with a price superior to that of Directed Fills would have
price priority and would execute ahead of inferior priced Directed
Fills in the Directed Order Process. Also, PL Orders with a price
superior to that of displayed orders would have price priority and
would execute ahead of inferior priced displayed orders in the Display
Order Process.
    The Exchange believes that the implementation of the aforementioned
rule changes relating to ArcaEx order processing would enhance order
execution opportunities on ArcaEx. The Exchange believes that the
proposed order type would allow for additional opportunities for
liquidity providers to passively interact with interest in the Arca
book.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,\9\ in general, and furthers
the objectives of

Section 6(b)(1) of the Act,\10\ in particular, in that it is designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of
a free and open market and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited
nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange requested that the proposed rule change be given
expedited review and accelerated approval pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)
of the Act. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule proposal is
consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange. In particular, the Exchange believes that its proposal to
implement the PL Order adds significant value to investors and Users,
will enhance available order interaction opportunities, and does not
raise any new regulatory issues. Accordingly, the Exchange believes
that its proposal will facilitate transactions in securities, remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national system, and, in general, protect investors and the public
interest.
    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve such proposed rule change, as amended, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-PCX-2005-53 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-9303.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PCX-2005-53. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section, Station
Place, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal
office of the PCX. All comments received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PCX-
2005-53 and should be submitted on or before October 12, 2005.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-18762 Filed 9-20-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62563-62564]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24829]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. 2019-0914]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of a Renewed Approval of Information Collection:
Certification of Aircraft and Airmen for the Operation of Light-Sport
Aircraft

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The collection involves the recordkeeping requirement for
owners/operators of aircraft issued a special airworthiness certificate
in the light-sport aircraft category (SLSA) to keep the current status
of applicable safety directives, and transfer these records with the
aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold. The information to be
collected is necessary to determine and ensure the SLSA aircraft is in
a condition for safe flight prior to aircraft operation.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by January 14, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Please send written comments:
    By Electronic Docket: www.regulations.gov (Enter docket number into
search field)
    By email: Tanya Glines<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tanya Glines by email at:
[email protected]; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality

of the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0730.
    Title: Certification of Aircraft and Airmen for the Operation of
Light-Sport Aircraft.
    Form Numbers: Aircraft maintenance records/logs.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: Title 14 CFR, Sec.  91.417(a)(2)(v) requires each
registered owner or operator to retain records containing the current
status of applicable safety directives including, for each, the method
of compliance, the safety directive number and revision date.
Additionally, if the safety directive involves recurring action, the
time and date when the next action is required.
    Recording this information and retaining these records is necessary
to determine if unsafe conditions have been corrected on aircraft
issued a special airworthiness certificate in the light-sport category
(SLSA), which assists in ensuring that the SLSA aircraft is in a
condition safe for flight prior to its operation within the national
airspace.
    Respondents include owners/operators of SLSA, aircraft mechanics,
and LSA repairmen with a Maintenance rating. The records of SLSA safety
directive compliance are retained by the aircraft owner/operator, who
must keep the records for the life of the SLSA aircraft and transfer
them to the new owner at the time the aircraft is sold. The burden
estimates are based on the current number of registered SLA and a
projected future growth rate.
    Respondents: 2935 owners/operators of SLSA aircraft.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 2 Hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 5870 hours annual industry burden.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 12, 2019.
Tanya A. Glines,
Aviation Safety Inspector, Safety Standards, General Aviation
Maintenance Branch (AFS-350).
[FR Doc. 2019-24829 Filed 11-14-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 81 (Friday, April 26, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24682-24683]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09956]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0755; FRL-9384-9]

Dinotefuran; Pesticide Tolerances for Emergency Exemptions;
Technical Amendment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a final rule in the Federal Register of November 9,
2012, concerning establishing time-limited tolerances for dinotefuran
on pome fruit, group 11 and stone fruit, group 12, in connection with
authorizations for emergency exemption uses under section 18 of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). This
document amends the tolerance listing for dinotefuran by restoring the
time-limited tolerances that were inadvertently deleted by a subsequent
(unrelated) final rule published in the Federal Register of November
28, 2012.

DATES: This final rule amendment is effective April 26, 2013.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0755, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305-
5805. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information
about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Conrath, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(703) 308-9356; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Does this action apply to me?

    The Agency included in the final rule a list of those who may be
potentially affected by this action.

II. What does this technical amendment do?

    On November 9, 2012, EPA issued a final rule establishing time-
limited tolerances for residues of dinotefuran in or on pome fruit,
group 11 and stone fruit, group 12 in 40 CFR 180.603(b). A subsequent
rule was published on November 28, 2012, establishing permanent
tolerances for dinotefuran on rice and other commodities, under 40 CFR
180.603(a). Inadvertently, with the establishment of the permanent
tolerances on November 28, 2012, the time-limited tolerances for pome
fruit, group 11 and stone fruit, group 12, that had previously been
established in the November 9, 2012 final rule were deleted. This final
rule will restore Sec.  180.603(b), as well as the pesticide time-
limited tolerances for pome fruit, group 11 and stone fruit, group 12,
to support uses authorized under section 18 emergency exemptions.

III. Why is this amendment issued as a final rule?

    Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B)) provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a final rule without
providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. EPA has
determined that there is good cause for making this technical amendment
final without prior proposal and opportunity for comment, in order to
move quickly on the emergency exemption to address an urgent non-
routine situation and ensure that the resulting food is safe and
lawful, as provided for in FFDCA section 408(l)(6). EPA finds that this
constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).

IV. Do any of the statutory and executive order reviews apply to this
action?

    EPA included a discussion of the statutory and Executive Order
reviews in the November 9, 2012 final rule.

V. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and
pests.

    Dated: April 19, 2013.
Daniel J. Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, 40 CFR Chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. In Sec.  [emsp14]180.603, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:

Sec.  [emsp14]180.603  Dinotefuran; tolerances for residues.

* * * * *
    (b) Section 18 emergency exemptions. Time-limited tolerances are
established for residues of dinotefuran, (RS)-1-methyl-2-nitro-3-
((tetrahydro-3-furanyl)methyl)guanidine, including its metabolites and
degradates, in or on the commodities in the table below resulting from
use of the pesticide pursuant to FIFRA section 18 emergency exemptions.
Compliance with the tolerance levels specified below is to be
determined by measuring only the sum of dinotefuran and its metabolites
DN, 1-methyl-3-(tetrahydro-3-furylmethyl)guanidine, and UF, 1-methyl-3-
(tetrahydro-3-furylmethyl)urea, calculated as the stoichiometric
equivalent of dinotefuran, in or on the commodities listed in the table
below. The tolerances expire and are revoked on the dates specified in
the table.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Expiration/
                   Commodity                     Parts per    revocation
                                                  million        date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fruit, pome, group 11.........................          1.0     12/31/15
Fruit, stone, group 12........................          1.0     12/31/15
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-09956 Filed 4-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 48242]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15836]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER23-2407-000]

Strauss Wind, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Strauss Wind, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is August 9, 2023.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners,
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is
encouraged to contact OPP at<PHONE_NUMBER> or [email protected].

    Dated: July 20, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-15836 Filed 7-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30562-30564]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12443]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-67011; File No. SR-EDGA-2012-09]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amendments to Rule 2.11
That Establish the Authority To Cancel Orders and Describe the
Operation of an Error Account

May 17, 2012.

I. Introduction

    On March 22, 2012, EDGA Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``EDGA'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend EDGA Rule 2.11 to (1) add a new
subparagraph (a)(6) that addresses the authority of EDGA and its
routing broker-dealer, Direct Edge ECN LLC d/b/a DE Route (``DE
Route'') to cancel orders if and when a systems, technical, or
operational issue occurs, and (2) amend subparagraph (a)(4) and add new
subparagraph (a)(7) to describe the operation of an error account for
DE Route. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on April 6, 2012.\3\ The Commission received no
comment letters regarding the proposed rule change. This order approves
the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66714 (April 2, 2012),
77 FR 20863 (April 6, 2012) (SR-EDGA-2012-09) (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    DE Route, a broker-dealer that is a facility and an affiliate of
the Exchange, provides outbound routing services from the Exchange to
other market centers pursuant to Exchange rules.\4\ In its proposal,
the Exchange states that a systems, technical, or operational issue may
occur at EDGA, DE Route, or a Trading Center \5\ that causes EDGA or DE
Route to cancel orders, if the Exchange or DE Route determines that
such action is necessary to maintain a fair and orderly market.\6\ The
Exchange also states that systems, technical, or operational issues
that occur at EDGA, DE Route, or a Trading Center may result in DE
Route acquiring an error position that it must resolve.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Notice, 77 FR at 20864, n.3 and accompanying text, and
text accompanying n.4. See also EDGA Rule 2.11; and Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 61698 (March 12, 2010) 75 FR 13151 (March
18, 2010) at 13165.
    The Exchange also receives equities orders routed inbound to the
Exchange by DE Route from EDGX Exchange, Inc. under a pilot period
ending on June 30, 2013. See Notice, 77 FR at 20864. See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64362 (April 28, 2011), 76 FR
25386 (May 4, 2011) (SR-EDGA-2011-13); and Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 66643 (March 22, 2012), 77 FR 18876 (March 28, 2012)
(SR-EDGA-2012-10) (filing to extend the pilot period through June
30, 2013).
    \5\ EDGA Rule 2.11(a) defines ``Trading Center'' as ``other
securities exchanges, facilities of securities exchanges, automated
trading systems, electronic communications networks or other brokers
or dealers.'' See also Notice, 77 FR at 20864, n.5 (stating that
``Trading Centers'' is as defined in EDGA Rule 2.11(a) and Rule
600(b)(78) of Regulation NMS under the Act, 17 CFR 242.600(b)(78)).
    \6\ See Notice, 77 FR at 20864. For examples of some of the
circumstances in which EDGA or DE Route may decide to cancel orders,
see id.
    \7\ See id. For examples of some of the circumstances that may
lead to error positions, see id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    New subparagraph (a)(6) to EDGA Rule 2.11 provides EDGA or DE Route
with general authority to cancel orders to maintain fair and orderly
markets when a systems, technical, or operational issue occurs at EDGA,
DE Route, or a Trading Center. EDGA or DE Route will be required to
provide notice of the cancellation of orders to Members \8\ as soon as
practicable.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ EDGA Rule 1.5(n) defines ``Member'' to mean ``any registered
broker or dealer, or any person associated with a registered broker
or dealer, that has been admitted to membership in the Exchange''
and states that ``[a] Member will have the status of a `member' of
the Exchange as that term is defined in Section 3(a)(3) of the
[Exchange] Act.''
    \9\ See EDGA Rule 2.11(a)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    New subparagraphs (a)(4) and (a)(7) provide authority for DE Route
to maintain an error account for the purpose of addressing, and sets
forth the procedures for resolving, error positions. Specifically, DE
Route will maintain an error account for the purpose of liquidating an
error position acquired in connection with its role as an Outbound
Router \10\ when such position, in the judgment of DE Route subject to
the factors described in EDGA Rule 2.11(a)(7) (and as set forth below),
cannot be fairly and practicably assigned to one or more Members in its
entirety.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ EDGA Rule 2.11(a) defines DE Route, in its function
providing outbound routing of orders from the Exchange to other
Trading Centers as the ``Outbound Router.''
    \11\ See EDGA Rule 2.11(a)(7). An error position can be acquired
as a result of a systems, technical, or operational issue
experienced by EDGA, DE Route, or a Trading Center to which DE Route
directed an outbound order. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In determining whether an entire error position can be fairly and
practicably assigned to one or more Members, DE Route will consider (i)
whether DE Route has accurate and sufficient information to assign the
entire amount of an error position to all affected Members; and (ii)
whether DE Route is able to evaluate available information in order to
assign the entire amount of an error position to all affected Members
by the first business day following the trade date on which the error
position was established.\12\ If DE Route determines that an error
position can be assigned to one or more Members by the first business
day following the trade date on which the error position was incurred,
DE Route will (i) assign the entire amount of the error position to all
affected Members, and (ii) make and keep records to document the
rationale for the assignment to those Members.\13\ All determinations
and assignments will be made in a non-discriminatory manner.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See id.
    \13\ See id.
    \14\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If, however, DE Route reasonably concludes, due to the number of
erroneous executions or the number of members potentially impacted,
that it would not be able to trace each erroneous execution comprising
an error position back to the affected Members in a timely manner, then
DE Route will assume the entire amount of the error position into the
error account.\15\ DE Route will make and keep records of the factors
considered in determining whether to acquire an error position into the
error account.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Notice, 77 FR at 20865.
    \16\ See EDGA Rule 2.11(a)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If DE Route determines to acquire an error position into the error
account, DE Route will liquidate the error position as soon as
practicable.\17\ DE Route will be required to provide complete time and
price discretion for the trading to liquidate the error positions to a
third-party broker-dealer, and would be prohibited from attempting to
exercise any influence or control over the timing or methods of such
trading.\18\ Further, DE Route will be required to establish and
implement written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed
to restrict the flow of confidential and proprietary information
between the third-party broker-dealer, on one hand, and the Exchange
and DE Route, on the other, associated with the liquidation of the
error positions.\19\ DE Route will make and keep records associated
with the liquidation of the error position through a third-party
broker-dealer.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See id.
    \18\ See id.
    \19\ See id.
    \20\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion and Commission's Findings

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act
\21\ and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.\22\ In particular, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\23\
which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national
securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of

trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest; and are not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. In addition, the Commission
believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section
11A(a)(1)(C) of the Act \24\ in that it seeks to assure economically
efficient execution of securities transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \22\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission recognizes that a systems, technical, or operational
issue may occur, and believes that EDGA Rule 2.11, in allowing EDGA or
DE Route to cancel orders affected by a systems, technical, or
operational issue, should provide a reasonably efficient means for the
Exchange to handle such orders, and appears reasonably designed to
permit EDGA to maintain fair and orderly markets.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ The Commission notes that EDGA states that the proposed
amendments to EDGA Rule 2.11 are designed to maintain fair and
orderly markets, ensure full trade certainty for market
participants, and avoid disrupting the clearance and settlement
process. See Notice, 77 FR at 20866. The Commission also notes that
EDGA states that a decision to cancel orders due to a systems,
technical, or operational issue may not cause the Exchange to
declare self-help against a Trading Center pursuant to Rule 611 of
Regulation NMS, in which case the Exchange would continue to be
subject to the order protection requirements of Rule 611 with
respect to that Trading Center. See 17 CFR 242.611(b). See also
Notice, 77 FR at 20865, n.12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission also believes that allowing DE Route to maintain an
error account to resolve error positions acquired in connection with
its role as an Outbound Router pursuant to the procedures set forth in
the rule, and as described above, is consistent with the Act. The
Commission notes that the rule establishes criteria for determining
which positions are error positions that may be acquired into the error
account, and which will be assigned to Members.\26\ DE Route, in
connection with a particular systems, technical, or operational issue,
will be required to either (i) assign the entire amount of a resulting
error position to Members or (ii) liquidate such position.\27\ Also, DE
Route will assign an error position that results from a particular
systems, technical, or operational issue to Members only if the entire
amount of such error position can be assigned to all of the affected
Members.\28\ If DE Route cannot fairly and practically assign the
entire amount of an error position to all affected Members, DE Route
will liquidate such error position.\29\ In this regard, the Commission
believes that the new rule appears reasonably designed to further just
and equitable principles of trade and the protection of investors and
the public interest, and to help prevent unfair discrimination, in that
it should help assure the handling of error positions will be based on
clear and objective criteria, and that the resolution of those
positions will occur promptly through a transparent process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See EDGA Rule 2.11(a)(7).
    \27\ See id.
    \28\ See id.
    \29\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the Commission notes that it has previously expressed
concern about the potential for unfair competition and conflicts of
interest between an exchange's self-regulatory obligations and its
commercial interest when the exchange is affiliated with one of its
members.\30\ The Commission is also concerned about the potential for
misuse of confidential and proprietary information. The Commission
believes that the requirement that DE Route provide complete time and
price discretion for the liquidation of an error position to a third-
party broker-dealer, including that DE Route not attempt to exercise
any influence or control over the timing or methods of such trading,
combined with the requirement that DE Route establish and implement
policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to restrict the
flow of confidential and proprietary information to the third-party
routing broker liquidating such positions, should help mitigate the
Commission's concerns. In particular, the Commission believes that
these requirements should help assure that none of EDGA, DE Route, or
the third-party broker-dealer is able to misuse confidential or
proprietary information obtained in connection with the liquidation of
error positions for its own benefit. The Commission also notes that DE
Route would be required to make and keep records documenting the
rationale for assignment of error positions to Members, documenting the
factors considered in determining to acquire error positions into the
error account, and associated with the liquidation of error positions
through the third-party broker-dealer.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65455
(September 30, 2011), 76 FR 62119 (October 6, 2011) at 62120, n.16
and accompanying text.
    \31\ See EDGA Rule 2.11(a)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Commission notes that the proposed procedures for
canceling orders and handling of error positions are consistent with
procedures the Commission has approved for another exchange.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66963 (May 10,
2012), 77 FR 28919 (May 16, 2012) (SR-NYSEArca-2012-22).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\33\ that the proposed rule change (SR-EDGA-2012-09) be, and it
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-12443 Filed 5-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 106 (Friday, June 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36302-36303]
[FR Doc No: 2023-11764]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC23-67-000.
    Applicants: Foxhound Solar, LLC, Dominion Solar Projects VI, Inc.
    Description: Foxhound Solar, LLC et. al. submits Response to FERC's
April 19, 2023 Deficiency Letter re the Application for Authorization
Pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power Act.
    Filed Date: 5/16/23.
    Accession Number: 20230516-5116.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/30/23.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG23-173-000.
    Applicants: Horus Louisiana I, LLC.
    Description: Horus Louisiana I, LLC submits Notice of Self-
Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status.
    Filed Date: 5/25/23.
    Accession Number: 20230525-5136.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/15/23.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER18-99-008.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: South Central MCN LLC Compliance
Filing Pursuant to Order Issued to be effective 4/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/26/23.
    Accession Number: 20230526-5026.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/16/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-1161-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Refund Report: CCSF Refund Report for missed Unmetered
Points (WDT SA 275) to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 5/26/23.
    Accession Number: 20230526-5000.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/16/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-1972-000.
    Applicants: Energy Harbor LLC.
    Description: Request for Waiver and Expedited Consideration of
Energy Harbor LLC.
    Filed Date: 5/25/23.
    Accession Number: 20230525-5197.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/15/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-1973-000.
    Applicants: BE-Pine 1 LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Baseline new to be effective
5/27/2023.
    Filed Date: 5/26/23.
    Accession Number: 20230526-5111.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/16/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-1975-000.
    Applicants: Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Initial Filing of Service
Agreement No. 911 to be effective 4/27/2023.
    Filed Date: 5/26/23.
    Accession Number: 20230526-5120.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/16/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-1976-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to ISA, Service
Agreement No. 6163; Queue No. AD1-155 to be effective 7/26/2023.
    Filed Date: 5/26/23.
    Accession Number: 20230526-5137.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/16/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-1977-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2023-05-26 Recollation-
Assigning New Collation Values (no tariff changes) 1 of 2 to be
effective 6/28/2010.
    Filed Date: 5/26/23.
    Accession Number: 20230526-5166.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/16/23.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 26, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-11764 Filed 6-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14702-14703]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05799]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR14-23-000]

Sunoco Pipeline L.P.; SunVit Pipeline LLC; Notice of Petition for
Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on March 6, 2014, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2) of
the Commission's Rules of Practices and Procedure, 18 CFR
385.207(a)(2)(2014), Sunoco Pipeline L.P. and SunVit Pipeline LLC
jointly filed a petition requesting a declaratory order, approving the
specified rate structures, terms of service, and prorationing
methodology for the proposed Permian Express 2 pipeline project
(Project). The Project will carry crude oil from the Permian Basin in
west Texas to downstream markets and refineries, as more fully
explained in the petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in this proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must
serve a copy of that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission,

888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on April 11, 2014.

    Dated: March 11, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-05799 Filed 3-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 6553]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03024]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-823-000]

ColGreen North Shore, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding
ColGreen North Shore, LLC`s application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is February 28, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
[email protected] or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 8, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-03024 Filed 2-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P