STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

This assessment is based on Standard Review Draft, dated 12/20/2012.

Chemical ID:   P-13-0109							Reviewer: Kwon/SS

Results Table: Dose, Concentration, and Days Exceeded Results Summary

Exposure Scenario1	Water	Landfill	Stack Air	Fugitive Air

Release activity(ies)2; exposure calculation(s)3	Drinking Water	Fish Ingestion	7Q104

μg/l	# Days	mg/kg/day	mg/kg/day	mg/kg/day	mg/kg/day	mg/kg/day

MFG: Max ADR, max acute eco	0.36	---	1.42	---	7393.72	---	---	0.50	--- ---	---

MFG: Max LADD	---	1.69E-05	---	7.24E-05	---	---	1.15E-04	---	2.06E-04 ---	---

PROC: Max ADR, max acute eco	4.21E-02	---	0.30	---	863.40	---	--- 9.74E-02	---	---	---

PROC: Max LADD	---	3.62E-06	---	1.55E-05	---	---	1.54E-04	---	3.83E-04 ---	---

USE1: Max ADR, PDM1	6.84E-03	---	2.91E-02	---	145.45	213	---	---	--- 3.31E-02	---

USE1: PDM2	---	---	---	---	109.85	233	---	---	---	---	---

USE1: Max LADD	---	8.32E-05	---	3.56E-04	---	---	5.37E-04	---	1.71E-03 ---	7.07E-04

USE2: Max ADR, max acute eco	0.22	---	1.58	---	4500.31	---	---	0.41	--- ---	---

USE2: PDM	---	---	---	---	376.60	250	---	---	---	---	---

USE2: Max LADD	---	4.12E-04	---	1.76E-03	---	---	1.62E-03	---	9.71E-04 ---	---

Exposure Based Criteria

Parameter	Exp Based	Persistent	Exceedance Value

Drinking (Surface) Water Dose (mg/kg/day)	No	NA

	Fish Ingestion Dose (mg/kg/day)	No	NA

	Inhalation Dose (mg/kg/day)	No	NA

	Groundwater Dose (mg/kg/day)	No	NA

	Surface Water Release After Treatment (kg/yr)	Yes	NA	6573

Total Release After Treatment (kg/yr)	Yes	NA	242,074

Consumer Use?	Yes	NA

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109	       Assessor:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

 Scenario#:1	       Number of Release Sites: 1.

 Release Activity:	MFG: Max ADR, max acute eco

 Release Description:	WATER	LANDFILL

Non-sludge/Sludge 	STACK	FUGITIVE

Total Releases:	400.00	0.00	407.20	0.00

	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)

Non-sludge/Sludge

Release Days/yr:	1.00	 ADVANCE \D 4.95 0.00/0.00	1.00	0.00

Per Site Release:	400.00	0.00/0.00	407.20	0.00

	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)

Remarks:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

               Chemical ID: P-13-0109

SIC-CODE BASED  HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 1	Number of Sites: 1	RELEASE ACTIVITY:MFG: Max ADR, max acute eco

SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: Organic Chemicals Manufacture

SIC-CODE (S): 2865,2869	EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

WWT

REMOVAL

(%)

RELEASE

DAYS	PRETREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	POSTTREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	DWT

(%)

BCF

(L/kg)

90.00	1.          	400.        	40.00	0.00	1000.00

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER

PLANT TYPE	% ILE

FACILITY	STREAM FLOW (MLD)	STREAM CONC. (μg/l)

Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10	Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10

ALL	50	2825.61	935.49	634.16	514.20	14.16	42.76	63.08	77.79

ALL	10	50.57	9.38	5.41	4.53	790.98	4264.39	7393.72	8830.02

DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES

Exposure Units	Drinking Water Results	Drinking Water Units

Fish Ingestion Results	Fish Ingestion Units

	50%	10%

50%	10%

	Cancer

LADDpot 	3.02E-07	1.69E-05	mg/kg/day	1.30E-06	7.24E-05	mg/kg/day

LADCpot 	1.55E-05	8.67E-04	mg/L	1.55E-02	0.87	mg/kg

Acute

ADRpot 	3.57E-03	0.36	mg/kg/day	2.54E-02	1.42	mg/kg/day

SIC Code Comments:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109

INHALATION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES (POST-TREATMENT)

SCENARIO #: 1	RELEASE ACTIVITY:MFG: Max ADR, max acute eco

RELEASE DESCRIPTION:

METHOD OF CALCULATION: Screen3

EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

Number of Sites:	1.

	Per Site Fugitive Release:	NA	kg/site/day

Fugitive Release Days per Year:	NA	days

% Removal via Fugitive Release:	0.00	%

Total Fugitive Release:	NA	kg/yr

Max Annual Average Air Concentration (Fugitive):	0.00	µg/m3

Max 24 Hour Average Air Concentration(Fugitive):	0.00	µg/m3

Per Site Stack Release:	407.20	kg/site/day

Stack Release Days per Year:	1.00	days

% Removal via Stack Release:	0.00	%

Total Stack Release:	407.20	kg/yr

Max Annual Average Air Concentration (Stack):	1.50	µg/m3

Max 24 Hour Average Air Concentration (Stack):	2740.00	µg/m3

Exposure Units

Results

(Stack)

Results

(Fugitive)	ASSUMPTIONS

	ED

(years)	AT

(years)	BW

(kg)	Inh. Rate (m3/hr)

Cancer

LADDpot (mg/kg/day)	1.10E-04	N/A	30.00	75.00	71.80	0.55

LADCpot (mg/m3)	6.00E-04	N/A	30.00	75.00	NA	NA

Acute

ADRpot (mg/kg/day)	0.50	N/A	NA	1 day	71.80	0.55

Inhalation Comments:               Stack Parameter Data                                                        Fugitive Parameter Data

Stack Height	10.00	m	Release Height:	N/A

	Inside Stack Diameter:	0.10	m	Length of Release Opening:	N/A

	Stack Gas Exit Velocity:	0.10	m/sec	Width of Release Opening:	N/A

	Stack Gas Temperature:	293.00	K

	Meteorological and Terrain Information:

Surrounding Land Use:	Rural

	Terrain Height:	0.00	m

Distance to Residence of Interest:	100.00	m

Meteorological Class:	Full

	Stability Class:	NA

	Wind Speed:	NA

	Downwash Information:

Facility Length:	NA	m

Facility Width:	NA	m

Facility Height:	NA	m

  STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109	       Assessor:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

 Scenario#:2	       Number of Release Sites: 1.

 Release Activity:	MFG: Max LADD

 Release Description:	WATER	LANDFILL

Non-sludge/Sludge 	STACK	FUGITIVE

Total Releases:	400.00	550.00	760.00	0.00

	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)

Non-sludge/Sludge

Release Days/yr:	1.00	 ADVANCE \D 4.95 1.00/0.00	1.00	0.00

Per Site Release:	400.00	550.00/0.00	760.00	0.00

	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)

Remarks:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

               Chemical ID: P-13-0109

SIC-CODE BASED  HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 2	Number of Sites: 1	RELEASE ACTIVITY:MFG: Max LADD

SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: Organic Chemicals Manufacture

SIC-CODE (S): 2865,2869	EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

WWT

REMOVAL

(%)

RELEASE

DAYS	PRETREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	POSTTREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	DWT

(%)

BCF

(L/kg)

90.00	1.          	400.        	40.00	0.00	1000.00

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER

PLANT TYPE	% ILE

STREAM CONC. (μg/l)

Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10	Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10

ALL	50	2825.61	935.49	634.16	514.20	14.16	42.76	63.08	77.79

ALL	10	50.57	9.38	5.41	4.53	790.98	4264.39	7393.72	8830.02

DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES

Exposure Units	Drinking Water Results	Drinking Water Units

Fish Ingestion Results	Fish Ingestion Units

	50%	10%

50%	10%

	Cancer

LADDpot 	3.02E-07	1.69E-05	mg/kg/day	1.30E-06	7.24E-05	mg/kg/day

LADCpot 	1.55E-05	8.67E-04	mg/L	1.55E-02	0.87	mg/kg

Acute

ADRpot 	3.57E-03	0.36	mg/kg/day	2.54E-02	1.42	mg/kg/day

SIC Code Comments:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109

DRINKING WATER EXPOSURE ESTIMATES FROM LANDFILL RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 2	ACTIVITY: MFG: Max LADD

RELEASE DESCRIPTION:

EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

NUMBER OF

SITES	NON-SLUDGE LANDFILL RELEASE AND DAYS OF RELEASE

(kg/site/day)/(days)	 LANDFILLED SLUDGE1

AND DAYS OF RELEASE

(kg/site/day)/(days)

MIGRATION DESCRIPTOR2	ADSORPTION TO WASTEWATER SLUDGE

 (%)	DRINKING WATER TREATMENT

 (%)

1.          	550.00/1.00	0.00/0.00	Slow	0.00	0.00

                1     Landfilled sludge equals the fraction adsorbed to wastewater treatment sludge times the surface

               water pre-treatment release.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1                 2 	Migration Descriptor		Log Koc	 Groundwater Concentration (GWC)

							(mg/L per kg release)

	Negligible			no migration 	None

Negligible to slow 		> 4.5 		3.21E-6

Slow 				<4.5 to 3.5 	2.67E-5

Moderate 			<3.5 to 2.5 	5.95E-5

Rapid 				<2.5 		7.55E-5

        Exposure Units

Results	ASSUMPTIONS

ED

(years)	AT

(years)	BW

(kg)	IR

 (L/day)

Cancer

LADDpot (mg/kg/day)	1.15E-04	30.00	75.00	71.80	1.40

LADCpot (mg/L)	5.87E-03	30.00	75.00	NA	NA

REMARKS:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109

INHALATION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES (POST-TREATMENT)

SCENARIO #: 2	RELEASE ACTIVITY:MFG: Max LADD

RELEASE DESCRIPTION:

METHOD OF CALCULATION: Screen3

EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

Number of Sites:	1.

	Per Site Fugitive Release:	NA	kg/site/day

Fugitive Release Days per Year:	NA	days

% Removal via Fugitive Release:	0.00	%

Total Fugitive Release:	NA	kg/yr

Max Annual Average Air Concentration (Fugitive):	0.00	µg/m3

Max 24 Hour Average Air Concentration(Fugitive):	0.00	µg/m3

Per Site Stack Release:	760.00	kg/site/day

Stack Release Days per Year:	1.00	days

% Removal via Stack Release:	0.00	%

Total Stack Release:	760.00	kg/yr

Max Annual Average Air Concentration (Stack):	2.80	µg/m3

Max 24 Hour Average Air Concentration (Stack):	5120.00	µg/m3

Exposure Units

Results

(Stack)

Results

(Fugitive)	ASSUMPTIONS

	ED

(years)	AT

(years)	BW

(kg)	Inh. Rate (m3/hr)

Cancer

LADDpot (mg/kg/day)	2.06E-04	N/A	30.00	75.00	71.80	0.55

LADCpot (mg/m3)	1.12E-03	N/A	30.00	75.00	NA	NA

Acute

ADRpot (mg/kg/day)	0.94	N/A	NA	1 day	71.80	0.55

Inhalation Comments:               Stack Parameter Data                                                        Fugitive Parameter Data

Stack Height	10.00	m	Release Height:	N/A

	Inside Stack Diameter:	0.10	m	Length of Release Opening:	N/A

	Stack Gas Exit Velocity:	0.10	m/sec	Width of Release Opening:	N/A

	Stack Gas Temperature:	293.00	K

	Meteorological and Terrain Information:

Surrounding Land Use:	Rural

	Terrain Height:	0.00	m

Distance to Residence of Interest:	100.00	m

Meteorological Class:	Full

	Stability Class:	NA

	Wind Speed:	NA

	Downwash Information:

Facility Length:	NA	m

Facility Width:	NA	m

Facility Height:	NA	m

  STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109	       Assessor:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

 Scenario#:3	       Number of Release Sites: 6.

 Release Activity:	PROC: Max ADR, max acute eco

 Release Description:	WATER	LANDFILL

Non-sludge/Sludge 	STACK	FUGITIVE

Total Releases:	402.00	0.00	469.20	0.00

	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)

Non-sludge/Sludge

Release Days/yr:	1.00	 ADVANCE \D 4.95 0.00/0.00	1.00	0.00

Per Site Release:	67.00	0.00/0.00	78.20	0.00

	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)

Remarks:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

               Chemical ID: P-13-0109

SIC-CODE BASED  HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 3	Number of Sites: 6	RELEASE ACTIVITY:PROC: Max ADR, max acute eco

SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: POTW (Indust., includes POTWs which receive ind. disch.)

SIC-CODE (S): Subset of 4952	EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

WWT

REMOVAL

(%)

RELEASE

DAYS	PRETREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	POSTTREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	DWT

(%)

BCF

(L/kg)

90.00	1.          	67.         	6.70	0.00	1000.00

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER

PLANT TYPE	% ILE

STREAM CONC. (μg/l)

Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10	Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10

ALL	50	288.00	123.84	78.18	66.05	23.26	54.10	85.70	101.44

ALL	10	39.60	13.29	7.76	7.57	169.19	504.14	863.40	885.07

DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES

Exposure Units	Drinking Water Results	Drinking Water Units

Fish Ingestion Results	Fish Ingestion Units

	50%	10%

50%	10%

	Cancer

LADDpot 	4.97E-07	3.62E-06	mg/kg/day	2.13E-06	1.55E-05	mg/kg/day

LADCpot 	2.55E-05	1.85E-04	mg/L	2.55E-02	0.19	mg/kg

Acute

ADRpot 	4.52E-03	4.21E-02	mg/kg/day	4.18E-02	0.30	mg/kg/day

SIC Code Comments:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109

INHALATION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES (POST-TREATMENT)

SCENARIO #: 3	RELEASE ACTIVITY:PROC: Max ADR, max acute eco

RELEASE DESCRIPTION:

METHOD OF CALCULATION: Screen3

EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

Number of Sites:	6.

	Per Site Fugitive Release:	NA	kg/site/day

Fugitive Release Days per Year:	NA	days

% Removal via Fugitive Release:	0.00	%

Total Fugitive Release:	NA	kg/yr

Max Annual Average Air Concentration (Fugitive):	0.00	µg/m3

Max 24 Hour Average Air Concentration(Fugitive):	0.00	µg/m3

Per Site Stack Release:	78.20	kg/site/day

Stack Release Days per Year:	1.00	days

% Removal via Stack Release:	0.00	%

Total Stack Release:	469.20	kg/yr

Max Annual Average Air Concentration (Stack):	0.29	µg/m3

Max 24 Hour Average Air Concentration (Stack):	530.00	µg/m3

Exposure Units

Results

(Stack)

Results

(Fugitive)	ASSUMPTIONS

	ED

(years)	AT

(years)	BW

(kg)	Inh. Rate (m3/hr)

Cancer

LADDpot (mg/kg/day)	2.13E-05	N/A	30.00	75.00	71.80	0.55

LADCpot (mg/m3)	1.16E-04	N/A	30.00	75.00	NA	NA

Acute

ADRpot (mg/kg/day)	9.74E-02	N/A	NA	1 day	71.80	0.55

Inhalation Comments:               Stack Parameter Data                                                        Fugitive Parameter Data

Stack Height	10.00	m	Release Height:	N/A

	Inside Stack Diameter:	0.10	m	Length of Release Opening:	N/A

	Stack Gas Exit Velocity:	0.10	m/sec	Width of Release Opening:	N/A

	Stack Gas Temperature:	293.00	K

	Meteorological and Terrain Information:

Surrounding Land Use:	Rural

	Terrain Height:	0.00	m

Distance to Residence of Interest:	100.00	m

Meteorological Class:	Full

	Stability Class:	NA

	Wind Speed:	NA

	Downwash Information:

Facility Length:	NA	m

Facility Width:	NA	m

Facility Height:	NA	m

  STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109	       Assessor:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

 Scenario#:4	       Number of Release Sites: 6.

 Release Activity:	PROC: Max LADD

 Release Description:	WATER	LANDFILL

Non-sludge/Sludge 	STACK	FUGITIVE

Total Releases:	402.00	4434.00	8466.00	0.00

	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)

Non-sludge/Sludge

Release Days/yr:	1.00	 ADVANCE \D 4.95 1.00/0.00	1.00	0.00

Per Site Release:	67.00	739.00/0.00	1411.00	0.00

	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)

Remarks:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

               Chemical ID: P-13-0109

SIC-CODE BASED  HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 4	Number of Sites: 6	RELEASE ACTIVITY:PROC: Max LADD

SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: POTW (Indust., includes POTWs which receive ind. disch.)

SIC-CODE (S): Subset of 4952	EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

WWT

REMOVAL

(%)

RELEASE

DAYS	PRETREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	POSTTREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	DWT

(%)

BCF

(L/kg)

90.00	1.          	67.         	6.70	0.00	1000.00

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER

PLANT TYPE	% ILE

FACILITY	STREAM FLOW (MLD)	STREAM CONC. (μg/l)

Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10	Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10

ALL	50	288.00	123.84	78.18	66.05	23.26	54.10	85.70	101.44

ALL	10	39.60	13.29	7.76	7.57	169.19	504.14	863.40	885.07

DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES

Exposure Units	Drinking Water Results	Drinking Water Units

Fish Ingestion Results	Fish Ingestion Units

	50%	10%

50%	10%

	Cancer

LADDpot 	4.97E-07	3.62E-06	mg/kg/day	2.13E-06	1.55E-05	mg/kg/day

LADCpot 	2.55E-05	1.85E-04	mg/L	2.55E-02	0.19	mg/kg

Acute

ADRpot 	4.52E-03	4.21E-02	mg/kg/day	4.18E-02	0.30	mg/kg/day

SIC Code Comments:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109

DRINKING WATER EXPOSURE ESTIMATES FROM LANDFILL RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 4	ACTIVITY: PROC: Max LADD

RELEASE DESCRIPTION:

EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

NUMBER OF

SITES	NON-SLUDGE LANDFILL RELEASE AND DAYS OF RELEASE

(kg/site/day)/(days)	 LANDFILLED SLUDGE1

AND DAYS OF RELEASE

(kg/site/day)/(days)

MIGRATION DESCRIPTOR2	ADSORPTION TO WASTEWATER SLUDGE

 (%)	DRINKING WATER TREATMENT

 (%)

6.          	739.00/1.00	0.00/0.00	Slow	0.00	0.00

                1     Landfilled sludge equals the fraction adsorbed to wastewater treatment sludge times the surface

               water pre-treatment release.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1                 2 	Migration Descriptor		Log Koc	 Groundwater Concentration (GWC)

							(mg/L per kg release)

	Negligible			no migration 	None

Negligible to slow 		> 4.5 		3.21E-6

Slow 				<4.5 to 3.5 	2.67E-5

Moderate 			<3.5 to 2.5 	5.95E-5

Rapid 				<2.5 		7.55E-5

        Exposure Units

Results	ASSUMPTIONS

ED

(years)	AT

(years)	BW

(kg)	IR

 (L/day)

Cancer

LADDpot (mg/kg/day)	1.54E-04	30.00	75.00	71.80	1.40

LADCpot (mg/L)	7.89E-03	30.00	75.00	NA	NA

REMARKS:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109

INHALATION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES (POST-TREATMENT)

SCENARIO #: 4	RELEASE ACTIVITY:PROC: Max LADD

RELEASE DESCRIPTION:

METHOD OF CALCULATION: Screen3

EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

Number of Sites:	6.

	Per Site Fugitive Release:	NA	kg/site/day

Fugitive Release Days per Year:	NA	days

% Removal via Fugitive Release:	0.00	%

Total Fugitive Release:	NA	kg/yr

Max Annual Average Air Concentration (Fugitive):	0.00	µg/m3

Max 24 Hour Average Air Concentration(Fugitive):	0.00	µg/m3

Per Site Stack Release:	1411.00	kg/site/day

Stack Release Days per Year:	1.00	days

% Removal via Stack Release:	0.00	%

Total Stack Release:	8466.00	kg/yr

Max Annual Average Air Concentration (Stack):	5.21	µg/m3

Max 24 Hour Average Air Concentration (Stack):	9500.00	µg/m3

Exposure Units

Results

(Stack)

Results

(Fugitive)	ASSUMPTIONS

	ED

(years)	AT

(years)	BW

(kg)	Inh. Rate (m3/hr)

Cancer

LADDpot (mg/kg/day)	3.83E-04	N/A	30.00	75.00	71.80	0.55

LADCpot (mg/m3)	2.08E-03	N/A	30.00	75.00	NA	NA

Acute

ADRpot (mg/kg/day)	1.75	N/A	NA	1 day	71.80	0.55

Inhalation Comments:               Stack Parameter Data                                                        Fugitive Parameter Data

Stack Height	10.00	m	Release Height:	N/A

	Inside Stack Diameter:	0.10	m	Length of Release Opening:	N/A

	Stack Gas Exit Velocity:	0.10	m/sec	Width of Release Opening:	N/A

	Stack Gas Temperature:	293.00	K

	Meteorological and Terrain Information:

Surrounding Land Use:	Rural

	Terrain Height:	0.00	m

Distance to Residence of Interest:	100.00	m

Meteorological Class:	Full

	Stability Class:	NA

	Wind Speed:	NA

	Downwash Information:

Facility Length:	NA	m

Facility Width:	NA	m

Facility Height:	NA	m

  STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109	       Assessor:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

 Scenario#:5	       Number of Release Sites: 29.

 Release Activity:	USE1: Max ADR, PDM1

 Release Description:	WATER	LANDFILL

Non-sludge/Sludge 	STACK	FUGITIVE

Total Releases:	2.46E+04	0.00	0.00	9311.90

	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)

Non-sludge/Sludge

Release Days/yr:	221.00	 ADVANCE \D 4.95 0.00/0.00	0.00	247.00

Per Site Release:	3.84	0.00/0.00	0.00	1.30

	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)

Remarks:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

               Chemical ID: P-13-0109

SIC-CODE BASED  HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 5	Number of Sites: 29	RELEASE ACTIVITY:USE1: Max ADR, PDM1

SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: Metal Finishing

SIC-CODE (S): 34xx - 39xx	EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

WWT

REMOVAL

(%)

RELEASE

DAYS	PRETREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	POSTTREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	DWT

(%)

BCF

(L/kg)

90.00	221.        	3.84        	0.38	0.00	1000.00

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER

PLANT TYPE	% ILE

STREAM CONC. (μg/l)

Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10	Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10

ALL	50	300.46	107.45	67.50	55.59	1.28	3.57	5.69	6.91

ALL	10	23.74	4.69	2.64	2.27	16.18	81.88	145.45	169.16

DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES

Exposure Units	Drinking Water Results	Drinking Water Units

Fish Ingestion Results	Fish Ingestion Units

	50%	10%

50%	10%

	Cancer

LADDpot 	6.04E-06	7.64E-05	mg/kg/day	2.59E-05	3.27E-04	mg/kg/day

LADCpot 	3.10E-04	3.92E-03	mg/L	0.31	3.92	mg/kg

Acute

ADRpot 	2.99E-04	6.84E-03	mg/kg/day	2.30E-03	2.91E-02	mg/kg/day

SIC Code Comments:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

               Chemical ID:  P-13-0109

SIC CODE EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 5	RELEASE ACTIVITY: USE1: Max ADR, PDM1

SIC CODE DESCRIPTION: Metal Finishing

ASSOCIATED SIC CODES: 34xx - 39xx

SIC CODE RESULTS

COC (μg/L)	Percent of Year COC Exceeded	Number of Days COC Exceeded Release days/year	Loading (kg/site/day)	Waste Water

Treatment (%)	High/Avg

Analysis

1.00	58	213	221.00	3.84	90.00	High

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109

INHALATION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES (POST-TREATMENT)

SCENARIO #: 5	RELEASE ACTIVITY:USE1: Max ADR, PDM1

RELEASE DESCRIPTION:

METHOD OF CALCULATION: Screen3

EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

Number of Sites:	29.

	Per Site Fugitive Release:	1.30	kg/site/day

Fugitive Release Days per Year:	247.00	days

% Removal via Fugitive Release:	0.00	%

Total Fugitive Release:	9311.90	kg/yr

Max Annual Average Air Concentration (Fugitive):	9.62	µg/m3

Max 24 Hour Average Air Concentration(Fugitive):	180.00	µg/m3

Per Site Stack Release:	NA	kg/site/day

Stack Release Days per Year:	NA	days

% Removal via Stack Release:	0.00	%

Total Stack Release:	NA	kg/yr

Max Annual Average Air Concentration (Stack):	0.00	µg/m3

Max 24 Hour Average Air Concentration (Stack):	0.00	µg/m3

Exposure Units

Results

(Stack)

Results

(Fugitive)	ASSUMPTIONS

	ED

(years)	AT

(years)	BW

(kg)	Inh. Rate (m3/hr)

Cancer

LADDpot (mg/kg/day)	N/A	7.07E-04	30.00	75.00	71.80	0.55

LADCpot (mg/m3)	N/A	3.85E-03	30.00	75.00	NA	NA

Acute

ADRpot (mg/kg/day)	N/A	3.31E-02	NA	1 day	71.80	0.55

Inhalation Comments:               Stack Parameter Data                                                        Fugitive Parameter Data

Stack Height	10.00

Release Height:	3.00	m

Inside Stack Diameter:	0.10

Length of Release Opening:	10.00	m

Stack Gas Exit Velocity:	0.10

Width of Release Opening:	10.00	m

Stack Gas Temperature:	293.00

	Meteorological and Terrain Information:

Surrounding Land Use:	Rural

	Terrain Height:	0.00	m

Distance to Residence of Interest:	100.00	m

Meteorological Class:	Full

	Stability Class:	NA

	Wind Speed:	NA

	Downwash Information:

Facility Length:	NA	m

Facility Width:	NA	m

Facility Height:	NA	m

  STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109	       Assessor:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

 Scenario#:6	       Number of Release Sites: 29.

 Release Activity:	USE1: PDM2

 Release Description:	WATER	LANDFILL

Non-sludge/Sludge 	STACK	FUGITIVE

Total Releases:	2.08E+04	0.00	0.00	0.00

	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)

Non-sludge/Sludge

Release Days/yr:	247.00	 ADVANCE \D 4.95 0.00/0.00	0.00	0.00

Per Site Release:	2.90	0.00/0.00	0.00	0.00

	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)

Remarks:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

               Chemical ID: P-13-0109

SIC-CODE BASED  HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 6	Number of Sites: 29	RELEASE ACTIVITY:USE1: PDM2

SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: Metal Finishing

SIC-CODE (S): 34xx - 39xx	EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

WWT

REMOVAL

(%)

RELEASE

DAYS	PRETREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	POSTTREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	DWT

(%)

BCF

(L/kg)

90.00	247.        	2.9         	0.29	0.00	1000.00

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER

PLANT TYPE	% ILE

STREAM CONC. (μg/l)

Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10	Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10

ALL	50	300.46	107.45	67.50	55.59	0.97	2.70	4.30	5.22

ALL	10	23.74	4.69	2.64	2.27	12.22	61.83	109.85	127.75

DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES

Exposure Units	Drinking Water Results	Drinking Water Units

Fish Ingestion Results	Fish Ingestion Units

	50%	10%

50%	10%

	Cancer

LADDpot 	5.09E-06	6.45E-05	mg/kg/day	2.18E-05	2.76E-04	mg/kg/day

LADCpot 	2.61E-04	3.31E-03	mg/L	0.26	3.31	mg/kg

Acute

ADRpot 	2.26E-04	5.17E-03	mg/kg/day	1.73E-03	2.19E-02	mg/kg/day

SIC Code Comments:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

               Chemical ID:  P-13-0109

SIC CODE EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 6	RELEASE ACTIVITY: USE1: PDM2

SIC CODE DESCRIPTION: Metal Finishing

ASSOCIATED SIC CODES: 34xx - 39xx

SIC CODE RESULTS

COC (μg/L)	Percent of Year COC Exceeded	Number of Days COC Exceeded Release days/year	Loading (kg/site/day)	Waste Water

Treatment (%)	High/Avg

Analysis

1.00	64	233	247.00	2.90	90.00	High

  STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109	       Assessor:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

 Scenario#:7	       Number of Release Sites: 29.

 Release Activity:	USE1: Max LADD

 Release Description:	WATER	LANDFILL

Non-sludge/Sludge 	STACK	FUGITIVE

Total Releases:	2.68E+04	7.48E+04	1.82E+05	9311.90

	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)

Non-sludge/Sludge

Release Days/yr:	1.00	 ADVANCE \D 4.95 1.00/0.00	1.00	1.00

Per Site Release:	924.04	2578.94/0.00	6283.94	321.10

	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)

Remarks:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

               Chemical ID: P-13-0109

SIC-CODE BASED  HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 7	Number of Sites: 29	RELEASE ACTIVITY:USE1: Max LADD

SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: Metal Finishing

SIC-CODE (S): 34xx - 39xx	EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

WWT

REMOVAL

(%)

RELEASE

DAYS	PRETREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	POSTTREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	DWT

(%)

BCF

(L/kg)

90.00	1.          	924.04      	92.40	0.00	1000.00

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER

PLANT TYPE	% ILE

FACILITY	STREAM FLOW (MLD)	STREAM CONC. (μg/l)

Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10	Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10

ALL	50	300.46	107.45	67.50	55.59	307.54	859.97	1368.95	1662.24

ALL	10	23.74	4.69	2.64	2.27	3892.33	1.97E+04	3.50E+04	4.07E+04

DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES

Exposure Units	Drinking Water Results	Drinking Water Units

Fish Ingestion Results	Fish Ingestion Units

	50%	10%

50%	10%

	Cancer

LADDpot 	6.57E-06	8.32E-05	mg/kg/day	2.82E-05	3.56E-04	mg/kg/day

LADCpot 	3.37E-04	4.27E-03	mg/L	0.34	4.27	mg/kg

Acute

ADRpot 	7.19E-02	1.65	mg/kg/day	0.55	6.99	mg/kg/day

SIC Code Comments:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109

DRINKING WATER EXPOSURE ESTIMATES FROM LANDFILL RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 7	ACTIVITY: USE1: Max LADD

RELEASE DESCRIPTION:

EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

NUMBER OF

SITES	NON-SLUDGE LANDFILL RELEASE AND DAYS OF RELEASE

(kg/site/day)/(days)	 LANDFILLED SLUDGE1

AND DAYS OF RELEASE

(kg/site/day)/(days)

MIGRATION DESCRIPTOR2	ADSORPTION TO WASTEWATER SLUDGE

 (%)	DRINKING WATER TREATMENT

 (%)

29.         	2578.94/1.00	0.00/0.00	Slow	0.00	0.00

                1     Landfilled sludge equals the fraction adsorbed to wastewater treatment sludge times the surface

               water pre-treatment release.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1                 2 	Migration Descriptor		Log Koc	 Groundwater Concentration (GWC)

							(mg/L per kg release)

	Negligible			no migration 	None

Negligible to slow 		> 4.5 		3.21E-6

Slow 				<4.5 to 3.5 	2.67E-5

Moderate 			<3.5 to 2.5 	5.95E-5

Rapid 				<2.5 		7.55E-5

        Exposure Units

Results	ASSUMPTIONS

ED

(years)	AT

(years)	BW

(kg)	IR

 (L/day)

Cancer

LADDpot (mg/kg/day)	5.37E-04	30.00	75.00	71.80	1.40

LADCpot (mg/L)	2.75E-02	30.00	75.00	NA	NA

REMARKS:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109

INHALATION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES (POST-TREATMENT)

SCENARIO #: 7	RELEASE ACTIVITY:USE1: Max LADD

RELEASE DESCRIPTION:

METHOD OF CALCULATION: Screen3

EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

Number of Sites:	29.

	Per Site Fugitive Release:	321.10	kg/site/day

Fugitive Release Days per Year:	1.00	days

% Removal via Fugitive Release:	0.00	%

Total Fugitive Release:	9311.90	kg/yr

Max Annual Average Air Concentration (Fugitive):	9.62	µg/m3

Max 24 Hour Average Air Concentration(Fugitive):	4.39E+04	µg/m3

Per Site Stack Release:	6283.94	kg/site/day

Stack Release Days per Year:	1.00	days

% Removal via Stack Release:	0.00	%

Total Stack Release:	1.82E+05	kg/yr

Max Annual Average Air Concentration (Stack):	23.20	µg/m3

Max 24 Hour Average Air Concentration (Stack):	4.23E+04	µg/m3

Exposure Units

Results

(Stack)

Results

(Fugitive)	ASSUMPTIONS

	ED

(years)	AT

(years)	BW

(kg)	Inh. Rate (m3/hr)

Cancer

LADDpot (mg/kg/day)	1.71E-03	7.07E-04	30.00	75.00	71.80	0.55

LADCpot (mg/m3)	9.28E-03	3.85E-03	30.00	75.00	NA	NA

Acute

ADRpot (mg/kg/day)	7.78	8.07	NA	1 day	71.80	0.55

Inhalation Comments:               Stack Parameter Data                                                        Fugitive Parameter Data

Stack Height	10.00	m	Release Height:	3.00	m

Inside Stack Diameter:	0.10	m	Length of Release Opening:	10.00	m

Stack Gas Exit Velocity:	0.10	m/sec	Width of Release Opening:	10.00	m

Stack Gas Temperature:	293.00	K

	Meteorological and Terrain Information:

Surrounding Land Use:	Rural

	Terrain Height:	0.00	m

Distance to Residence of Interest:	100.00	m

Meteorological Class:	Full

	Stability Class:	NA

	Wind Speed:	NA

	Downwash Information:

Facility Length:	NA	m

Facility Width:	NA	m

Facility Height:	NA	m

  STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109	       Assessor:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

 Scenario#:8	       Number of Release Sites: 5.

 Release Activity:	USE2: Max ADR, max acute eco

 Release Description:	WATER	LANDFILL

Non-sludge/Sludge 	STACK	FUGITIVE

Total Releases:	1746.12	0.00	1665.32	0.00

	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)

Non-sludge/Sludge

Release Days/yr:	1.00	 ADVANCE \D 4.95 0.00/0.00	1.00	0.00

Per Site Release:	349.22	0.00/0.00	333.06	0.00

	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)

Remarks:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

               Chemical ID: P-13-0109

SIC-CODE BASED  HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 8	Number of Sites: 5	RELEASE ACTIVITY:USE2: Max ADR, max acute eco

SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: POTW (Indust., includes POTWs which receive ind. disch.)

SIC-CODE (S): Subset of 4952	EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

WWT

REMOVAL

(%)

RELEASE

DAYS	PRETREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	POSTTREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	DWT

(%)

BCF

(L/kg)

90.00	1.          	349.22      	34.92	0.00	1000.00

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER

PLANT TYPE	% ILE

FACILITY	STREAM FLOW (MLD)	STREAM CONC. (μg/l)

Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10	Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10

ALL	50	288.00	123.84	78.18	66.05	121.26	282.00	446.69	528.73

ALL	10	39.60	13.29	7.76	7.57	881.88	2627.72	4500.31	4613.26

DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES

Exposure Units	Drinking Water Results	Drinking Water Units

Fish Ingestion Results	Fish Ingestion Units

	50%	10%

50%	10%

	Cancer

LADDpot 	2.59E-06	1.88E-05	mg/kg/day	1.11E-05	8.08E-05	mg/kg/day

LADCpot 	1.33E-04	9.66E-04	mg/L	0.13	0.97	mg/kg

Acute

ADRpot 	2.36E-02	0.22	mg/kg/day	0.22	1.58	mg/kg/day

SIC Code Comments:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109

INHALATION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES (POST-TREATMENT)

SCENARIO #: 8	RELEASE ACTIVITY:USE2: Max ADR, max acute eco

RELEASE DESCRIPTION:

METHOD OF CALCULATION: Screen3

EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

Number of Sites:	5.

	Per Site Fugitive Release:	NA	kg/site/day

Fugitive Release Days per Year:	NA	days

% Removal via Fugitive Release:	0.00	%

Total Fugitive Release:	NA	kg/yr

Max Annual Average Air Concentration (Fugitive):	0.00	µg/m3

Max 24 Hour Average Air Concentration(Fugitive):	0.00	µg/m3

Per Site Stack Release:	333.06	kg/site/day

Stack Release Days per Year:	1.00	days

% Removal via Stack Release:	0.00	%

Total Stack Release:	1665.32	kg/yr

Max Annual Average Air Concentration (Stack):	1.23	µg/m3

Max 24 Hour Average Air Concentration (Stack):	2240.00	µg/m3

Exposure Units

Results

(Stack)

Results

(Fugitive)	ASSUMPTIONS

	ED

(years)	AT

(years)	BW

(kg)	Inh. Rate (m3/hr)

Cancer

LADDpot (mg/kg/day)	9.05E-05	N/A	30.00	75.00	71.80	0.55

LADCpot (mg/m3)	4.92E-04	N/A	30.00	75.00	NA	NA

Acute

ADRpot (mg/kg/day)	0.41	N/A	NA	1 day	71.80	0.55

Inhalation Comments:               Stack Parameter Data                                                        Fugitive Parameter Data

Stack Height	10.00	m	Release Height:	N/A

	Inside Stack Diameter:	0.10	m	Length of Release Opening:	N/A

	Stack Gas Exit Velocity:	0.10	m/sec	Width of Release Opening:	N/A

	Stack Gas Temperature:	293.00	K

	Meteorological and Terrain Information:

Surrounding Land Use:	Rural

	Terrain Height:	0.00	m

Distance to Residence of Interest:	100.00	m

Meteorological Class:	Full

	Stability Class:	NA

	Wind Speed:	NA

	Downwash Information:

Facility Length:	NA	m

Facility Width:	NA	m

Facility Height:	NA	m

  STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109	       Assessor:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

 Scenario#:9	       Number of Release Sites: 5.

 Release Activity:	USE2: PDM

 Release Description:	WATER	LANDFILL

Non-sludge/Sludge 	STACK	FUGITIVE

Total Releases:	3.65E+04	0.00	0.00	0.00

	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)	(kg/yr)

Non-sludge/Sludge

Release Days/yr:	250.00	 ADVANCE \D 4.95 0.00/0.00	0.00	0.00

Per Site Release:	29.22	0.00/0.00	0.00	0.00

	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)

Remarks:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

               Chemical ID: P-13-0109

SIC-CODE BASED  HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 9	Number of Sites: 5	RELEASE ACTIVITY:USE2: PDM

SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: POTW (Indust., includes POTWs which receive ind. disch.)

SIC-CODE (S): Subset of 4952	EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

WWT

REMOVAL

(%)

RELEASE

DAYS	PRETREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	POSTTREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	DWT

(%)

BCF

(L/kg)

90.00	250.        	29.22       	2.92	0.00	1000.00

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER

PLANT TYPE	% ILE

STREAM CONC. (μg/l)

Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10	Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10

ALL	50	288.00	123.84	78.18	66.05	10.15	23.60	37.38	44.25

ALL	10	39.60	13.29	7.76	7.57	73.80	219.89	376.60	386.05

DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES

Exposure Units	Drinking Water Results	Drinking Water Units

Fish Ingestion Results	Fish Ingestion Units

	50%	10%

50%	10%

	Cancer

LADDpot 	5.42E-05	3.94E-04	mg/kg/day	2.32E-04	1.69E-03	mg/kg/day

LADCpot 	2.78E-03	2.02E-02	mg/L	2.78	20.22	mg/kg

Acute

ADRpot 	1.97E-03	1.84E-02	mg/kg/day	1.82E-02	0.13	mg/kg/day

SIC Code Comments:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

               Chemical ID:  P-13-0109

SIC CODE EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 9	RELEASE ACTIVITY: USE2: PDM

SIC CODE DESCRIPTION: POTW (Indust., includes POTWs which receive ind. disch.)

ASSOCIATED SIC CODES: Subset of 4952

SIC CODE RESULTS

COC (μg/L)	Percent of Year COC Exceeded	Number of Days COC Exceeded Release days/year	Loading (kg/site/day)	Waste Water

Treatment (%)	High/Avg

Analysis

1.00	68	250	250.00	29.22	90.00	High

  STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109	       Assessor:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

 Scenario#:10	       Number of Release Sites: 5.

 Release Activity:	USE2: Max LADD

 Release Description:	WATER	LANDFILL

愀Ĥ摧僊W

崀ﺄ廿钄懿Ĥ摧僊W

崀ﺄ廿钄懿Ĥ摧僊W

-

8

:

B

R

\

l

~

Ž

˜

¨

º

¼

ô

ö

"

#

崀ﺄ廿钄懿Ĥ摧僊W

º

¼

ö

崀ﺄ廿钄懿Ĥ摧僊W

崀ﺄ廿钄懿Ĥ摧僊W

崀ﺄ廿钄懿Ĥ摧僊W

崀ﺄ廿钄懿Ĥ摧僊W

#

'

0

4

=

崀ﺄ廿钄懿Ĥ摧僊W

愀Ĥ摧僊W਀#

'

/

4

<

E

M

R

Z

_

g

h

i

…

†

Š

“

˜

Ÿ

¨

¬

¹

º

Ã

Ä

Ô

Ú

Û

Þ

ó

ô

崀ﺄ廿钄懿Ĥ摧僊W

¹

º

Ä

È

Ì

Ð

Ô

Û

ß

ã

崀ﺄ廿钄懿Ĥ摧僊W

ऀã

ç

ë

ï

ó

ô

崀ﺄ廿钄懿Ĥ摧僊W

愀Ĥ摧㉠-

$

$

Ѐ

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

摧⳼m

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

愀Ĥ摧㉠-

kd

$

$

$

$

$

÷

愀Ĥ摧䄷¹

$

$

摧䄷¹

␃ก粄巼粄懼Ĥ摧䉝

Âÿ[

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

摧䉝

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

愀Ĥ摧㉠-

$

$

$

$

hç

hç

*$^„0ýgdç

*$gdç

„|ü]„|üa$gdç

$

gdç

$

a$gdç

gdç

^„0ýgdç

$

$

$

$

hç

hç

hç

hç

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

a$gdç

摧෧Â

$

a$gdç

gdç

$

a$gdç

gdç

hç

hç

gdç

$

a$gdç

gdç

$

a$gdç

gdç

^„0ýgdç

$

$

$

$

$

a$gdç

gdç

$

$

愀Ĥ摧㉠-

÷

愀Ĥ摧ᓿ

$

摧ᓿ

␃ก粄巼粄懼Ĥ摧礲Õ

Âÿ[

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

摧礲Õ

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

愀Ĥ摧㉠-

$

$

$

$

$

Âÿ[

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

摧猵

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

愀Ĥ摧㉠-

$

$

$

$

$

愀Ĥ摧㉠-

$

$

$

÷

愀Ĥ摧㬫7

$

摧㬫7

$

␃ก粄巼粄懼Ĥ摧ᒏÊ

Âÿ[

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

摧ᒏÊ

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

愀Ĥ摧㉠-

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

愀Ĥ摧㉠-

[

$

ਁЃ愀϶ﻶ؀ Site Release:	7626.00	7761.00/0.00	3586.00	0.00

	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)	(kg/site/day)

Remarks:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

               Chemical ID: P-13-0109

SIC-CODE BASED  HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 10	Number of Sites: 5	RELEASE ACTIVITY:USE2: Max LADD

SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: POTW (Indust., includes POTWs which receive ind. disch.)

SIC-CODE (S): Subset of 4952	EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

WWT

REMOVAL

(%)

RELEASE

DAYS	PRETREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	POSTTREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day)	DWT

(%)

BCF

(L/kg)

90.00	1.          	7626.       	762.60	0.00	1000.00

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER

PLANT TYPE	% ILE

FACILITY	STREAM FLOW (MLD)	STREAM CONC. (μg/l)

Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10	Harmonic Mean

30Q5

7Q10

1Q10

ALL	50	288.00	123.84	78.18	66.05	2647.92	6157.95	9754.41	1.15E+04

ALL	10	39.60	13.29	7.76	7.57	1.93E+04	5.74E+04	9.83E+04	1.01E+05

DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES

Exposure Units	Drinking Water Results	Drinking Water Units

Fish Ingestion Results	Fish Ingestion Units

	50%	10%

50%	10%

	Cancer

LADDpot 	5.66E-05	4.12E-04	mg/kg/day	2.42E-04	1.76E-03	mg/kg/day

LADCpot 	2.90E-03	2.11E-02	mg/L	2.90	21.10	mg/kg

Acute

ADRpot 	0.51	4.80	mg/kg/day	4.76	34.60	mg/kg/day

SIC Code Comments:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109

DRINKING WATER EXPOSURE ESTIMATES FROM LANDFILL RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 10	ACTIVITY: USE2: Max LADD

RELEASE DESCRIPTION:

EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

NUMBER OF

SITES	NON-SLUDGE LANDFILL RELEASE AND DAYS OF RELEASE

(kg/site/day)/(days)	 LANDFILLED SLUDGE1

AND DAYS OF RELEASE

(kg/site/day)/(days)

MIGRATION DESCRIPTOR2	ADSORPTION TO WASTEWATER SLUDGE

 (%)	DRINKING WATER TREATMENT

 (%)

5.          	7761.00/1.00	0.00/0.00	Slow	0.00	0.00

                1     Landfilled sludge equals the fraction adsorbed to wastewater treatment sludge times the surface

               water pre-treatment release.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1                 2 	Migration Descriptor		Log Koc	 Groundwater Concentration (GWC)

							(mg/L per kg release)

	Negligible			no migration 	None

Negligible to slow 		> 4.5 		3.21E-6

Slow 				<4.5 to 3.5 	2.67E-5

Moderate 			<3.5 to 2.5 	5.95E-5

Rapid 				<2.5 		7.55E-5

        Exposure Units

Results	ASSUMPTIONS

ED

(years)	AT

(years)	BW

(kg)	IR

 (L/day)

Cancer

LADDpot (mg/kg/day)	1.62E-03	30.00	75.00	71.80	1.40

LADCpot (mg/L)	8.29E-02	30.00	75.00	NA	NA

REMARKS:

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0109

INHALATION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES (POST-TREATMENT)

SCENARIO #: 10	RELEASE ACTIVITY:USE2: Max LADD

RELEASE DESCRIPTION:

METHOD OF CALCULATION: Screen3

EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

Number of Sites:	5.

	Per Site Fugitive Release:	NA	kg/site/day

Fugitive Release Days per Year:	NA	days

% Removal via Fugitive Release:	0.00	%

Total Fugitive Release:	NA	kg/yr

Max Annual Average Air Concentration (Fugitive):	0.00	µg/m3

Max 24 Hour Average Air Concentration(Fugitive):	0.00	µg/m3

Per Site Stack Release:	3586.00	kg/site/day

Stack Release Days per Year:	1.00	days

% Removal via Stack Release:	0.00	%

Total Stack Release:	1.79E+04	kg/yr

Max Annual Average Air Concentration (Stack):	13.20	µg/m3

Max 24 Hour Average Air Concentration (Stack):	2.42E+04	µg/m3

Exposure Units

Results

(Stack)

Results

(Fugitive)	ASSUMPTIONS

	ED

(years)	AT

(years)	BW

(kg)	Inh. Rate (m3/hr)

Cancer

LADDpot (mg/kg/day)	9.71E-04	N/A	30.00	75.00	71.80	0.55

LADCpot (mg/m3)	5.28E-03	N/A	30.00	75.00	NA	NA

Acute

ADRpot (mg/kg/day)	4.44	N/A	NA	1 day	71.80	0.55

Inhalation Comments:               Stack Parameter Data                                                        Fugitive Parameter Data

Stack Height	10.00	m	Release Height:	N/A

	Inside Stack Diameter:	0.10	m	Length of Release Opening:	N/A

	Stack Gas Exit Velocity:	0.10	m/sec	Width of Release Opening:	N/A

	Stack Gas Temperature:	293.00	K

	Meteorological and Terrain Information:

Surrounding Land Use:	Rural

	Terrain Height:	0.00	m

Distance to Residence of Interest:	100.00	m

Meteorological Class:	Full

	Stability Class:	NA

	Wind Speed:	NA

	Downwash Information:

Facility Length:	NA	m

Facility Width:	NA	m

Facility Height:	NA	m

愀Ĥ摧㉠-

$

$

$

$

÷

愀Ĥ摧ⱞò

$

$

摧ⱞò

␃ก粄巼粄懼Ĥ摧⩂

Âÿ[

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

摧⩂

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

1/9/13		page               of


[Federal Register: August 18, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 160)]
[Notices]
[Page 47797-47798]
[DOCID:fr18au06-72]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-446-000]

Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in
FERC Gas Tariff

August 1, 2006.
    Take notice that on July 27, 2006, Northern Border Pipeline Company
(Northern Border) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following

tariff sheets to become effective April 30, 2006:

Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 99A.
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 303A.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-13771 Filed 8-17-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73367-73369]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28905]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73743; File No. SR-BATS-2014-057]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Rule 14.11(j)(5) of BATS Exchange, Inc., To Remove the Restriction
Prohibiting Market Makers in UTP Derivative Securities From Acting or
Registering as a Market Maker in Any Reference Asset of That UTP
Derivative Security or Any Derivative Instrument Based on Such
Reference Asset

December 4, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on November 21, 2014, BATS Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or
``BATS'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
has designated this proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder,\4\ which renders it effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to amend Rule 14.11(j)(5) to
harmonize its restrictions on Market Makers \5\ in UTP Derivative
Securities \6\ with NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'') Rule 5.1(a)(2)(v)
\7\ and the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'') Rule 4630(e).\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The term ``Market Maker'' is defined as ``a Member that acts
as a Market Maker pursuant to Chapter XI.'' See Exchange Rule
1.5(l).
    \6\ The term ``UTP Derivative Security'' is defined as ``[a]ny
UTP Security that is a `new derivative securities product' as
defined in Rule 19b-4(e) under the Exchange Act . . . and traded
pursuant to Rule 19b-4(e) under the Exchange Act.'' See Exchange
Rule 14.11(j).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67066 (May 29,
2012), 77 FR 33010 (June 4, 2012) (SR-NYSEArca-2012-46) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Regarding
the Extension of Unlisted Trading Privileges to New Derivative
Securities Products That Are Listed on Another Exchange and to Make
Other Conforming and Technical Amendments). The Commission also
waived the 30-day operative delay for SR-NYSEArca-2012-46 under Rule
19b-4(f)(6) of the Act. Id.
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69858 (June 25,
2013), 78 FR 39432 (July 1, 2013) (SR-Nasdaq-2013-085) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change [sic]
Rule 4630 to Remove a Restriction on a Member Acting as a Registered
Market Maker in a Commodity-Related Security).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at http://www.batstrading.com/, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 14.11(j)(5) to harmonize its
restrictions on Market Makers in UTP Derivative Securities with NYSE
Arca Rule 5.1(a)(2)(v) \9\ and Nasdaq Rule 4630(e).\10\ The purpose of
the proposed rule change is to remove the restriction that a Member
acting as a registered Market Maker in a UTP Derivative Security on the
Exchange will not act or

register as a market maker in any Reference Asset \11\ that a UTP
Derivative Security derives its value from. The Exchange also proposes
to amend a related cross-reference contained in Exchange Rule 3.21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See supra note 7.
    \10\ See supra note 8.
    \11\ A ``Reference Asset'' is defined as one or more currencies,
or commodities, or derivatives based on one or more currencies, or
commodities, or is based on a basket or index comprised of
currencies or commodities that a UTP Derivative Security derives its
value from. See Exchange Rule 14.11(j)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Exchange Rule 14.11(j)(5) prohibits a Market Maker in a UTP
Derivative Security from acting or registering as a market maker on
another exchange in any Reference Asset of that UTP Derivative
Security, or any derivative instrument based on a Reference Asset of
that UTP Derivative Security (collectively, with Reference Assets,
``Related Instruments''). NYSE Arca Rule 5.1(a)(2)(v) and Nasdaq Rule
4630(e) recently amended their respective rules to permit market makers
to trade in securities underlying the derivative security so long as
that market maker discloses to NYSE Arca or Nasdaq all accounts within
which it trades the underlying securities.\12\ As amended, Exchange
Rule 14.11(j)(5), would similarly remove this prohibition, which states
that a Market Maker in a UTP Derivative Security is prohibited from
acting or registering as a market maker on another exchange in any
Related Instruments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See supra notes 7 and 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Similar to NYSE Arca Rule 5.1(a)(2)(v) and Nasdaq Rule 4630(e),
amended Rule 14.11(j)(5) would require a Member acting as a registered
Market Maker in a UTP Derivative Security to file with the Exchange, in
a manner prescribed by the Exchange, and to keep a current list
identifying all accounts for trading the underlying physical asset or
commodity, related futures or options on futures, or any other related
derivatives, which the Member acting as registered Market Maker may
have or over which it may exercise investment discretion. Rule
14.11(j)(5) would also prohibit a Member from acting as registered
Market Maker in the UTP Derivative Security from trading in the
underlying physical asset or commodity, related futures or options on
futures, or any other related derivatives in an account in which a
Member acting as a registered Market Maker, directly or indirectly,
controls trading activities, or has a direct interest in the profits or
losses thereof, that has not been reported to the Exchange.
    Exchange Rules \13\ ensure that Market Makers in UTP Derivative
Securities would continue to have in place reasonably designed policies
and procedures to prevent the misuse of material non-public information
with regard to also acting as a Market Maker in any Related
Instruments.\14\ In the context of approving a more flexible,
principled-based approach to information barriers by NYSE Arca, the
Commission stated that, ``while information barriers are not
specifically required under the proposal, a [firm's] business model or
business activities may dictate that an information barrier or a
functional separation be part of the appropriate set of policies and
procedures that would be reasonably designed to achieve compliance with
applicable securities law and regulations, and with applicable Exchange
rules.'' \15\ Rule 14.11(j)(5)(B) will continue to prohibit Market
Makers from using material non-public information in connection with
trading a Related Instrument. Rule 14.11(j)(5)(B) will also continue to
require that, in addition to the existing obligations under Exchange
rules regarding the production of books and records, a Market Maker
shall, upon request by the Exchange, make available to the Exchange any
books, records or other information pertaining to any Related
Instrument trading account or to the account of any registered or non-
registered employee affiliated with the Market Maker for which Related
Instruments are traded. Lastly, under Exchange Rule 14.11(j)(6) the
Exchange will enter into comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement
with other markets that offer trading in Related Instruments to the
same extent as the listing exchange's rules require the listing
exchange to enter into a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement
with such markets. This amendment does not lessen the protection of
Members from the risks associated with integrated market making and any
possible misuse of non-public information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Exchange Rules 5.5 and 14.1(j)(5)(B).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78o(g).
    \15\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60604 (September 1,
2009), 74 FR 46272 (September 8, 2009) (SR-NYSEArca-2009-78).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to the proposal set forth above, the Exchange also
proposes to amend a related cross-reference contained in Exchange Rule
3.21. Specifically, Rule 3.21 currently refers to Rule 14.1(c) as the
source of the definition for UTP Derivative Securities but that
definition is, in fact, contained in Rule 14.11(j).
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \16\ and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\17\ in that it is designed promote just and
equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, protect investors and the public interest. In addition, the
Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers or
dealers. The proposed rule change is substantially similar to the
existing NYSE Arca Rule 5.1(a)(2)(v) and Nasdaq Rule 4630(e).\18\ In
addition, the Exchange believes that amending Exchange Rule 14.11(j)(5)
to permit a Member acting as a registered Market Maker in a UTP
Derivative Security on the Exchange the flexibility to act or register
as a market maker in any Reference Asset that a UTP Derivative Security
derives its value from consistent with Commission and Exchange Rules
will remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market by providing the same flexibility to the Exchange that is
already available to NYSE Arca and Nasdaq regarding the market maker
activities for derivative-related Securities. Additionally, Exchange
Rule 14.11(j)(5), as amended, would continue to serve to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, as well as to protect
investors and the public interest from concerns that may be associated
with integrated market making and any possible misuse of non-public
information. Finally, the Exchange believes that the correction to the
cross-reference contained in Rule 3.21 is consistent with the Act in
that it will protect investors and the public interest by avoiding
potential confusion with respect to Exchange Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \18\ See supra notes 7 and 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change would not impose any burden on
competition. On the contrary, the Exchange believes that the proposal
will promote competition because it is a competitive response to
recently amended NYSE Arca and Nasdaq rules which permit market makers
to trade in the reference assets or components underlying the
derivative security on the same terms as that proposed by the
Exchange.\19\ Thus, the Exchange believes this proposed rule change is
necessary to permit fair

competition among national securities exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See supra notes 7 and 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \20\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative
delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately upon
filing. The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative
delay period is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest. The Commission notes that the proposal would allow
Market Makers in a UTP Derivative Security on the Exchange to act or
register as a Market Maker in any Related Instruments. The Commission
believes that proposal could allow the Exchange to attract more Market
Makers to the Exchange, thereby potentially increasing liquidity in UTP
Derivative Securities, provide more price competition, and enhance the
markets for those securities. The Commission further notes that the
proposal is similar to the rules of other national securities
exchanges.\22\ Therefore, the Commission designates the proposed rule
change to be operative upon filing.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.1(a)(2)(v) and Nasdaq Rule
4630(e).
    \23\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \24\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BATS-2014-057 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2014-057. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing will also be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2014-057 and should be
submitted on or before December 31, 2014.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28905 Filed 12-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 179 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56761-56762]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22585]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2011-1399; Airspace Docket No. 11-ASW-14]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Kerrville, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends Class E airspace at Kerrville, TX.
Additional controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate new Area
Navigation (RNAV) Standard Instrument Approach Procedures at Kerrville
Municipal

Airport/Louis Schreiner Field. The geographic coordinates of the
airport also are adjusted. The FAA is taking this action to enhance the
safety and management of Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations at the
airport. Due to subsequent decommissioning, the Shein locator outer
marker/nondirectional radio beacon (LOM/NDB) will be removed from the
regulatory text.

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, November 15, 2012. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR Part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone (817) 321-
7716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On May 21, 2012, the FAA published in the Federal Register a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend Class E airspace for the
Kerrville, TX, area, creating additional controlled airspace at
Kerrville Municipal Airport/Louis Schreiner Field (77 FR 29921) Docket
No. FAA-2011-1399. Interested parties were invited to participate in
this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal
to the FAA. No comments were received. Subsequent to publication, it
was discovered that the Shein LOM/NDB had been decommissioned. This
action removes the Shein LOM/NDB from the regulatory text,
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.9V dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15,
2011, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
Part 71 by amending Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface to accommodate new standard instrument approach
procedures at Kerrville Municipal Airport/Louis Schreiner Field,
Kerrville, TX. This action is necessary for the safety and management
of IFR operations at the airport. Geographic coordinates are updated to
coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database. This action also removes
the decommissioned Shein LOM/NDB from the regulatory text.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends controlled airspace at Kerrville Municipal Airport/Louis
Schreiner Field, Kerrville, TX.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air)

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9V, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15,
2011, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface.

* * * * *

ASW TX E5 Kerrville, TX [Amended]

Kerrville Municipal Airport/Louis Schreiner Field, TX
    (Lat. 29[deg]58'36'' N., long. 99[deg]05'08'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7.6-mile radius of Kerrville Municipal Airport/Louis
Schreiner Field, and within 2 miles each side of the 310[deg]
bearing from the airport extending from the 7.6-mile radius to 12.3
miles northwest of the airport, and within 2.2 miles each side of
the 131[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 7.6-mile
radius to 11.6 miles southeast of the airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 29, 2012.
David P. Medina,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2012-22585 Filed 9-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 14, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 198)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 63040-63042]
[DOCID:fr14oc10-2]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0672; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-047-AD;
Amendment 39-16473; AD 2010-21-13]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Corporation Model DC-
10-10, DC-10-10F, DC-10-30, DC-10-30F (KDC-10), DC-10-40, and DC-10-40F
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD requires installing a support bracket
and coupler on the left and right wing-to-fuselage transition, and
metallic overbraid on the left and right leading edge wire assembly.
This AD was prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer, as well as reports that the fuel quantity system was
affected by lightning-induced transients. We are issuing this AD to
prevent lightning-induced transients to the fuel quantity indication
system, which could cause voltage levels to go beyond original design
levels between fuel tank probes and structure, and become a potential
ignition source at the fuel tank, which, in combination with flammable
fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss
of the airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective November 18, 2010.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of November 18,
2010.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800-0019, Long Beach, California 90846-
0001; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, extension 2; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Lee, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-
4137; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
the specified products. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register
on July 7, 2010 (75 FR 38943). That NPRM proposed to require installing
a support bracket and coupler on the left and right wing-to-fuselage
transition, and metallic overbraid on the left and right leading edge
wire assembly.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 61 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
              Action                        Labor cost            Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation......................  28 work-hours x $85 per              $999           $3,379         $206,119
                                     hour = $2,380.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2010-21-13 McDonnell Douglas Corporation: Amendment 39-16473; Docket
No. FAA-2010-0672; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-047-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD is effective November 18, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to McDonnell Douglas Corporation Model DC-
10-10, DC-10-10F, DC-10-30, DC-10-30F (KDC-10), DC-10-40, and DC-10-
40F airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing
Service Bulletin DC10-28-262, Revision 1, dated June 9, 2010.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD results from fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer. The Federal Aviation Administration is issuing this AD
to prevent lightning-induced transients to the fuel quantity
indication system, which could cause voltage levels to go beyond
original design levels between fuel tank probes and structure and
become a potential ignition source at the fuel tank, which, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank
explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Installation

    (g) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD,
install a support bracket and coupler on the left and right wing-to-
fuselage transition, and metallic overbraid on the left and right
leading edge wire assembly, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin DC10-28-262, Revision 1,
dated June 9, 2010.

Installation According to Previous Issue of Service Bulletin

    (h) Installing a support bracket and coupler on the left and
right wing-to-fuselage transition, and metallic overbraid on the
left and right leading edge wire assembly, is also acceptable for
compliance with the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD if done
before the effective date of this AD in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin DC10-28-262,
dated January 6, 2010.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (i)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Samuel Lee, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140L,
FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-
5262; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.

Related Information

    (j) For more information about this AD, contact Samuel Lee,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140L, FAA, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California 90712-4137; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (562)
627-5210; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Material Incorporated by Reference

    (k) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin DC10-28-262, Revision
1, dated June 9, 2010, to do the actions required by this AD, unless
the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of Boeing Service Bulletin DC10-28-262,
Revision 1, dated June 9, 2010, under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800-0019, Long Beach, California 90846-
0001; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, extension 2; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 30, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-25442 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47877-47878]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15707]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0750; FRL-11134-01-OCSPP]

Pesticide Registration Review; Proposed Decisions for Several
Pesticides; Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's proposed
interim and proposed final registration review decisions and opens a
60-day public comment period on the proposed interim decisions for the
following pesticides: acetaminophen; aluminum phosphide, magnesium
phosphide, and phosphine; and polybutene resins.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 25, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0750, through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional
instructions on commenting and visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For pesticide specific information, contact: The Chemical Review
Manager for the pesticide of interest identified in Table 1 in Unit IV.
    For general information on the registration review program,
contact: Melanie Biscoe, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P),
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 566-0701; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest
identified in Table 1 in Unit IV.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all the information
that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information on a disk or CD-ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as CBI, and
then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the specific
information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version
of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the
comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be
submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at: https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
    3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low-income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.

II. Background

    Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide
registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the
statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform
its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human
health or the environment. As part of the registration review process,
the Agency has completed proposed interim or proposed final decisions
for all pesticides listed in Table 1 in Unit IV. Through this program,
EPA is ensuring that each pesticide's registration is based on current
scientific and other knowledge, including its effects on human health
and the environment.

III. Authority

    EPA is conducting its registration review of the chemicals listed
in the Table 1 in Unit IV pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural
Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C.
Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the
registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under
FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only
if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA
section 3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance with
widespread and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must
perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on
the environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the
environment, or a human dietary risk from residues that result from the
use of a pesticide in or on food.

IV. What action is the agency taking?

    Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58, this notice announces the availability
of EPA's proposed interim or proposed final registration review
decisions for the pesticides shown in Table 1 and opens a 60-day public
comment period on the proposed interim and proposed final registration
review decisions.

    Table 1--Proposed Interim Decisions and Proposed Final Decisions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Chemical review
  Registration review case name                           manager and
           and number                 Docket ID #           contact
                                                          information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acetaminophen, Case Number 7610.  EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-08  Lauren
                                   16.                 Weissenborn,
                                                       [email protected], (202)
                                                       566-2374.
Aluminum Phosphide, Case Number   EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-00  Jonathan Williams,
 0025.                             81.                 [email protected], (202)
                                                       566-2240.

Magnesium Phosphide, Case Number  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-00  Jonathan Williams,
 0645.                             81.                 [email protected], (202)
                                                       566-2240.
Phosphine, Case Number 7608.....  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-00  Jonathan Williams,
                                   81.                 [email protected], (202)
                                                       566-2240.
Polybutene Resins, Case Number    EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-07  Michelle Nolan,
 4076.                             99.                 [email protected], (202) 566-
                                                       2237.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The registration review docket for a pesticide includes earlier
documents related to the registration review case. For example, the
review opened with a Preliminary Work Plan, for public comment. A Final
Work Plan was placed in the docket following public comment on the
Preliminary Work Plan.
    The documents in the dockets describe EPA's rationales for
conducting additional risk assessments for the registration review of
the pesticides included in Table 1 in Unit IV, as well as the Agency's
subsequent risk findings and consideration of possible risk mitigation
measures. These proposed interim and proposed final registration review
decisions are supported by the rationales included in those documents.
Following public comment, the Agency will issue interim or final
registration review decisions for the pesticides listed in Table 1 in
Unit IV.
    The registration review final rule at 40 CFR 155.58(a) provides for
a minimum 60-day public comment period on all proposed registration
review decisions. This comment period is intended to provide an
opportunity for public input and a mechanism for initiating any
necessary amendments to the proposed decision. All comments should be
submitted using the methods in ADDRESSES and must be received by EPA on
or before the closing date. These comments will become part of the
docket for the pesticides included in Table 1 in Unit IV. Comments
received after the close of the comment period will be marked ``late.''
EPA is not required to consider these late comments.
    The Agency will carefully consider all comments received by the
closing date and may provide a ``Response to Comments Memorandum'' in
the docket. The interim or final registration review decision will
explain the effect that any comments had on the interim or final
decision and provide the Agency's response to significant comments.
    Background on the registration review program is provided at:
https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation.
    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: July 18, 2023.
Mary Elissa Reaves,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2023-15707 Filed 7-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P