[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 70 (Friday, April 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 20304]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08094]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2014-0004; Notice 2]

Extension of Comment Period on Whether Nonconforming 2012 McLaren
MP4[12C] Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the extension of the comment period on
a petition for NHTSA to decide that 2012 McLaren MP4[12C] passenger
cars that were not originally manufactured to comply with all
applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards are eligible for
importation into the United States.

DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is April 16, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. e.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>
    Instructions: Comments must be written in the English language, and
be no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to
the length of necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are
submitted in hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive confirmation that your comments were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
    How to Read Comments submitted to the Docket: You may read the
comments received by Docket Management at the address and times given
above. You may also view the documents from the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets. The docket ID number and title of this notice are shown at the
heading of this document notice. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue to file relevant information in
the Docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit
late comments. Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically search
the Docket for new material.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Stevens, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA<PHONE_NUMBER>).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 3, 2014, NHTSA published a notice
(at 79 FR 11869) that it had received a petition to decide that
nonconforming 2012 McLaren MP4[12C] passenger cars are eligible for
importation into the United States. The notice solicited public
comments on the petition and stated that the closing date for comments
is April 2, 2014.
    This is to notify the public that NHTSA is extending the comment
period on this petition, and allowing it to run until April 16, 2014.
This reopening is based on a request dated March 27, 2014, from McLaren
Automotive, Inc. (``McLaren'') the vehicle's manufacturer. McLaren
stated that the extension was needed because, in McLaren's view, the
petitioner cannot satisfy the statutory criteria, since it would be
very difficult, if not impossible, to bring nonconforming MP4[12C]
vehicles into compliance with all applicable FMVSSs. However, because
many of the compliance issues that are raised by the subject petition
are complex, McLaren will not be able to complete the preparation of
its comments in time to meet the current due date. McLaren believes
that this short extension will allow the preparation of a response that
will address the relevant issues, and that it will not cause any
hardship to the petitioner or to any other interested person.
    NHTSA has granted McLaren's request. All comments received before
the close of business on the closing date indicated above will be
considered, and will be available for examination in the docket at the
above address both before and after that date. To the extent possible,
comments filed after the closing date will also be considered. Notice
of final action on the petition will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(B), and (b)(1); 49
CFR 593.7; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.

Jeffrey Giuseppe,
Acting Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-08094 Filed 4-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register: October 27, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 208)]
[Notices]
[Page 63720-63721]
[DOCID:fr27oc08-75]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[USCG-2008-1036]

Information Collection Requests to Office of Management and
Budget; OMB Control Numbers: 1625-0079 and 1625-0088

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Sixty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit Information Collection Requests
(ICRs) and Analyses to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
requesting an extension of their approval for the following collections
of information: (1) 1625-0079, Standards of Training, Certification and
Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW), 1995 and 1997 Amendments to the
International Convention; and (2) 1625-0088, Voyage Planning for Tank
Barge Transits in the Northeast United States. Before submitting these
ICRs to OMB, the Coast Guard is inviting comments as described below.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before December 26,
2008.

ADDRESSES: To avoid duplicate submissions to the docket [USCG-2008-
1036], please use only one of the following means:
    (1) Online: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Mail: Docket Management Facility (DMF) (M-30), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT), West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (3) Hand deliver: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The DMF maintains the public docket for this notice. Comments and
material received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in
this notice as being available in the docket, will become part of this
docket and will be available for inspection or copying at room W12-140
on the West Building Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also find this docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Copies of the completed ICRs are available through this docket on
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are
available from Commandant (CG-611), U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters,
(Attn: Mr. Arthur Requina), 2100 2nd Street SW., Washington, DC 20593-
0001. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Arthur Requina, Office of
Information Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for questions on these documents. Contact Ms. Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations,<PHONE_NUMBER>, for questions on the docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this information
collection request should be granted based on it being necessary for
the proper performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the
Coast Guard would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical
utility of the collections; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of
the collections; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of information subject to the collections; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of collections on respondents, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. We will post all comments received, without
change, to http://www.regulations.gov. They will include any personal
information you provide. We have an agreement with DOT to use their
DMF. Please see the ``Privacy Act'' paragraph below.
    Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include the
docket number [USCG-2008-1036], indicate the specific section of the
document to which each comment applies, providing a reason for each
comment. We recommend you include your name, mailing address, an e-mail
address, or other contact information in the body of your document so
that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
You may submit your comments and material by electronic means, mail,
fax, or delivery to the DMF at the address under ADDRESSES; but please
submit them by only one means. If you submit them by mail or delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8-\1/2\ by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail
and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period. We may change
the documents supporting this collection of information or even the
underlying requirements in view of them.
    Viewing comments and documents: Go to http://www.regulations.gov to
view documents mentioned in this Notice as being available in the
docket. Enter the docket number [USCG-2008-1036] in the Search box, and
click, ``Go>>.'' You may also visit the DMF in room W12-140 on the West
Building Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
    Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments
received in dockets by the name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act
statement regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of
the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Information Collection Requests

    1. Title: Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for
Seafarers (STCW), 1995 and 1997 Amendments to the International
Convention.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0079.
    Summary: This information is necessary to ensure compliance with
the international requirements of the STCW Convention, and to maintain
an acceptable level of quality in activities associated with training
and assessment of merchant mariners.
    Need: 46 U.S.C. chapter 71 authorizes the Coast Guard to issue
regulations related to licensing of merchant mariners. These
regulations are

contained in 46 CFR chapter I, subchapter B.
    Forms: None.
    Respondents: Owners and operators of vessels, training
institutions, and mariners.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has decreased from 23,767
hours to 17,928 hours per year.
    2. Title: Voyage Planning for Tank Barge Transits in the Northeast
United States.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0088.
    Summary: The information collection requirement for a voyage plan
serves as a preventive measure and assists in ensuring the successful
execution and completion of a voyage in the First Coast Guard District.
The regulation associated with this collection of information (33 CFR
165.100) applies to primary towing vessels engaged in towing certain
tank barges carrying petroleum oil in bulk as cargo.
    Need: Section 311 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1998,
Pub. L. 105-383, 33 U.S.C. 1231, and 46 U.S.C. 3719 authorize the Coast
Guard to promulgate regulations for towing vessel and barge safety for
the waters of the Northeast subject to the jurisdiction of the First
Coast Guard District. This regulation is contained in 33 CFR 165.100.
The information for a voyage plan will provide a mechanism for
assisting vessels towing tank barges to identify those specific risks,
potential equipment failures, or human errors that may lead to
accidents.
    Forms: None.
    Respondents: Owners and operators of towing vessels.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has decreased from 31,651
hours to 2,692 hours per year.

    Dated: October 20, 2008.
D. T. Glenn,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Command,
Control, Communications, Computers and Information Technology.
 [FR Doc. E8-25516 Filed 10-24-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


[Federal Register: August 25, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 165)]
[Notices]
[Page 50061-50063]
[DOCID:fr25au08-87]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-58367; File No. SR-NYSE-2008-75]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Section 303A.02(b) of the Listed Company Manual with respect to
Two of Its Director Independence Tests

August 15, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 12, 2008, the New York Stock Exchange

LLC (``NYSE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been
substantially prepared by NYSE. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to make amendments to two of the tests with
respect to the independence of directors set forth in Section
303A.02(b) of the Exchange's Listed Company Manual (the ``Manual'').
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site (http://www.nyse.com), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary
and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NYSE included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. NYSE has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to make amendments to two of the tests with
respect to the independence of directors set forth in Section
303A.02(b) of the Manual.
Direct Compensation Test
    Section 303A.02(b)(ii) of the Manual provides that a director may
not be deemed independent for purposes of Section 303A if such director
has received, or has an immediate family member who has received,
during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than
$100,000 in direct compensation from the listed company, other than
director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred
compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not
contingent in any way on continued service). NYSE proposes to increase
the dollar threshold in this test from $100,000 to $120,000. This
change reflects the SEC's August 2006 amendment to the dollar threshold
applicable to related party transactions that must be disclosed under
Item 404 of Regulation S-K.\3\ Prior to the SEC's amendment to Item
404, the applicable threshold for disclosures was $60,000. The NYSE
believes that the monetary threshold in its independence definition
should be consistent with the amount in Regulation S-K Item 404. Using
a consistent standard would enhance the NYSE's ability to assess
compliance with the independent director requirements because companies
are required to disclose compensation in excess of $120,000, but are
not necessarily required to disclose compensation between $100,000 and
$120,000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Act Release No. 8732A (August 29, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Auditor Test
    Additionally, NYSE is proposing to amend the bright line test set
out in Section 303A.02(b)(iii) relating to a listed company's internal
or external auditor. The test currently precludes a director from being
deemed independent if:
     The director or an immediate family member is a current
partner of a firm that is the company's internal or external auditor;
     The director is a current employee of such a firm;
     The director has an immediate family member who is a
current employee of such a firm and who participates in the firm's
audit, assurance or tax compliance (but not tax planning) practice; or
     The director or an immediate family member was within the
last three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a
firm and personally worked on the listed company's audit within that
time.
    NYSE's experience to date has demonstrated that the current
standard with respect to immediate family members has had the effect of
precluding a director from being deemed independent in cases even where
an immediate family member had no relationship to the listed company's
audit. For example, NYSE's current test has required a listed company's
board to conclude that a director may no longer be deemed independent
when the director's child took an entry-level job in the audit practice
of the listed company's external auditor upon graduation from college,
notwithstanding the fact that the child was a low-level employee in a
different region and had no involvement with the listed company's
audit.
    In addition, NYSE's proposed change will bring its standards more
in line with the auditor tests utilized by Nasdaq and the American
Stock Exchange.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15)(F) and Amex Company
Guide Section 803(A)(2)(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NYSE proposes to modify its current test with respect to a
director's immediate family member to cover only an immediate family
member who:
     Is a current partner of the company's internal or external
auditor;
     Is a current employee of such a firm and personally works
on the listed company's audit; or
     Was within the last three years a partner or employee of
such a firm and personally worked on the listed company's audit within
that time.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) \5\ of the Act in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that it
is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
The Exchange believes that the proposed amendment to Section
303A.02(b)(iii) will help to perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market in that it will conform the Exchange's approach to that of
Nasdaq and Amex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that this amendment is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest because the amended
test will continue to bar a finding of independence where a director
has any material relationship with the listed company. The proposed
amendment to Section 303A.02(b)(ii) furthers the protection of
investors and the public interest in that it adopts the Commission's
own materiality threshold for related party transactions and will
therefore provide a standard that is clear, straightforward, and easy
for issuers to understand and apply.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires that a self-regulatory organization submit to the
Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of
the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission notes that the Exchange has satisfied the
five-day pre-filing notice requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2008-75 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2008-75. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2008-75 and should be
submitted on or before September 15, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-19591 Filed 8-22-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


SUPPORTING STATEMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NSPS for Onshore Natural Gas Processing Plants

1.  Identification of the Information Collection

1(a)  Title of the Information Collection

NSPS for Onshore Natural Gas Processing Plants (40 CFR part 60, subparts
KKK and LLL) (Renewal)

1(b)  Short Characterization/Abstract

The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Equipment Leaks of
volatile organic compound (VOC) from Onshore Natural Gas Processing
Plants, published at 40 CFR part 60, subpart KKK, were proposed on
January 20, 1984 and promulgated on June 24, 1985.  These standards
apply to the following affected facilities located at onshore natural
gas processing plants: compressors in VOC service or in wet gas service,
and the group of all equipment (except compressors) within a process
unit.  Affected facilities commenced construction, modification or
reconstruction after the date of proposal.  A process unit is defined as
the equipment assembled for extraction of natural gas liquids from field
gas, fractionation of liquids into natural gas products, or other
processing of natural gas products.

The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Onshore Natural Gas
Processing: SO2 Emissions, published at 40 CFR part 60, subpart LLL,
were proposed on January 20, 1984 and promulgated on October 1, 1985.
These standards apply to the following affected facilities located at
onshore natural gas processing plants: each sweetening unit, and each
sweetening unit followed by a sulfur recovery unit.  Affected facilities
commenced construction, modification or reconstruction after the date of
proposal.  A sweetening unit is defined as a process device that
separates the hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide (CO2) contents from
the sour natural gas stream.  The provisions of subpart LLL do not apply
to sweetening facilities that produce acid gas that is completely
re-injected into oil or gas bearing geologic strata or that is otherwise
not released to the atmosphere.  The control and monitoring requirements
of subpart LLL do not apply to affected facilities with design
capacities of less than two long tons per day of hydrogen sulfide in the
acid gas, expressed as sulfur.

In general, all NSPS standards require initial notifications,
performance tests, and periodic reports.  Owners or operators are also
required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any
startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected
facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is
inoperative.  These notifications, reports, and records are essential in
determining compliance, and are required of all sources subject to NSPS.

Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of this part shall
maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least
two years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports,
and records.  All reports are sent to the delegated state or local
authority.  In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the
reports are sent directly to the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) regional office.

Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an
average of four affected facilities at each plant site for subpart KKK,
along with one affected facility at each plant site for subpart LLL, and
that each plant site has only one respondent (i.e., the owner/operator
of the plant site).

All of these sources subject to subpart LLL are also subject to subpart
KKK.  Over the next three years, an average of 563 sources per year will
be subject to subpart KKK, and it is estimated that one additional
source per year will become subject to the standard in the next three
years.  There are approximately 79 of these sources of these that are
currently subject to subpart LLL, and it is estimated that three
additional sources will become subject to the standard in the next three
years.

There are approximately 563 onshore natural gas processing plants in the
United States, which are all publicly owned and operated by the onshore
natural gas processing industry.  None of the 563 plants in the United
States are owned by either state, local, tribal or the Federal
Government.  They are all owned and operated solely by privately owned
for-profit businesses.  You can find the burden to the “Affected
Public” listed below in Table 1: Annual Industry Burden and Cost -
NSPS for Onshore Natural Gas Processing Plants (40 CFR Part 60, Subparts
KKK and LLL).  The Federal government burden does not include work
performed by Federal employees only work performed by contractors, which
could be found listed below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden - NSPS
for Onshore Natural Gas Processing Plants (40 CFR Part 60, Subparts KKK
and LLL).

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the currently active
ICR without any “Terms of Clearance.”

2.  Need for and Use of the Collection

2(a)  Need/Authority for the Collection

The EPA is charged under section 111 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as
amended, to establish standards of performance for new stationary
sources that reflect:

. . . application of the best technological system of continuous
emissions reduction which (taking into consideration the cost of
achieving such emissions reduction, or any non-air quality health and
environmental impact and energy requirements) the Administrator
determines has been adequately demonstrated.  Section 111(a)(l).

The Agency refers to this charge as selecting the best demonstrated
technology (BDT).  Section 111 also requires that the Administrator
review and, if appropriate, revise such standards every four years.

In addition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require
any owner or operator subject to any requirement of this Act to:

(A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports; (C)
install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit
procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with
such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during
such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe);
(E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables
or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is
impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with
Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the
Administrator may reasonably require.

In the Administrator's judgment, VOC and sulfur dioxide emissions from
onshore natural gas processing plants cause or contribute to air
pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health
or welfare.  Therefore, the NSPS was promulgated for this source
category at 40 CFR part 60, subparts KKK and LLL.

2(b)  Practical Utility/Users of the Data

The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard ensure
compliance with the applicable regulations which where promulgated in
accordance with the Clean Air Act.  The collected information is also
used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings.

Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected
facility’s initial capability to comply with the emission standard.
Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the
standard at all times.  During the performance tests, a record of the
operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded
and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission
monitor.

The notifications required in the standard are used to inform the Agency
or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements
of the regulations.  The reviewing authority may then inspect the source
to ensure that the pollution control devices are properly installed and
operated, that leaks are being detected and repaired, and that the
standard is being met.  The performance test may also be observed.

The required semiannual and quarterly reports are used to determine
periods of excess emissions, identify problems at the facility, verify
operation/maintenance procedures, and for compliance determinations.

3.  Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria

The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR part
60, subparts KKK and LLL.

3(a)  Nonduplication

If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is
sent directly to the appropriate EPA regional office.  Otherwise, the
information is sent directly to the delegated state or local agency.  If
a state or local agency has adopted their own similar standards to
implement the Federal standards, a copy of the report submitted to the
state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the
report required by the Federal standards.  Therefore, no duplication
exists.

3(b)  Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB

An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this ICR
was published in the Federal Register (72 FR 10736) on March 9, 2007.
No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal
Register.

3(c)  Consultations

Over the next three years, an average of 563 facilities per year will be
subject to the standard.  In estimating the affected number of sources
and the growth rate of onshore natural gas processing plants subject to
this standard, EPA contacted Ms. Lynn Reed at<PHONE_NUMBER>, ONEOK,
Incorporated, Mr. Lance Lodes at<PHONE_NUMBER>, OGE-Enogex,
Incorporated, and Mr. Johnny Dreyer,<PHONE_NUMBER>, Gas Processors
Association (GPA).  We referenced the most recent data available.  We
reviewed information available from the Online Tracking Information
System (OTIS) which is the primary source of information regarding the
number of existing sources.  OTIS data was used in conjunction with
industry consultation to verify the number of sources and the industry
growth rate.

3(d)  Effects of Less Frequent Collection

Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of
assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards.
Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful
techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are
applied and emission limitations are met.  If the information required
by these standards was collected less frequently, the proper operation
and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility of detecting
violations would be less likely.

3(e)  General Guidelines

These reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the
regulations promulgated by OMB under 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5.

3(f)  Confidentiality

Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of
confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency
policies set forth in title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B -
Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR
36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43
FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).

3(g)  Sensitive Questions

None of the reporting or recordkeeping requirements contain sensitive
questions.

4.  The Respondents and the Information Requested

4(a)  Respondents/SIC Codes

The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are
stationary gas turbines.  The United States Standard Industrial
Classification (SIC) codes which correspond to the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS) code could be found in the
following table:

40 CFR part 60, subparts KKK and LLL	SIC Codes	NAICS Codes

Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas Extraction	1311	211111

Natural Gas Liquid Extraction	1321	211112

4(b)  Information Requested

None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements violate any of the
regulations established by OMB at 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5.

(i)  Data Items

In this ICR, all the data recorded or reported is required by the New
Source Performance Standards for Onshore Natural Gas Processing Plants
(40 CFR Part 60, Subparts KKK and LLL).

A source must make the following reports:

Notifications

Notification of construction or reconstruction	60.7(a)(1)

Notification of actual startup date	60.7(a)(3)

Notification of modification	60.7(a)(4

Notification of demonstration of continuous monitoring system	60.7(a)(5)

Notification of initial performance test	60.8(d)

Semiannual reports of excess emissions (subparts KKK and LLL)	60.7(c)

Performance test results (subparts KKK and LLL)	60.8(a), 60.636(a),
60.487(e)

Semiannual reports (subpart KKK)	60.636(a)-(c), 60.487(a)

Semiannual report on excess emissions from and performance of continuous
monitoring system, and/or summary report forms (subpart LLL)	60.647(b)

A source must keep the following records:

Recordkeeping

Maintain records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions of affected
facilities; malfunctions of control devices; and periods where the
continuous monitoring system is inoperative.	60.7(b)

Keep records of measurements, performance evaluations, calibration
checks, adjustments and maintenance related to continuous monitoring
systems.	60.7(f)

Keep records of parts of closed vent systems designated as unsafe or
difficult to inspect (subpart KKK).	60.632(a), 60.482-10(l)(1), (2)

Keep records of inspections of closed vent systems during which no leaks
are detected (subpart KKK).	60.632(a), 60.482-10(l)(4), (5)

Perform attachment of identification numbers to leaking equipment
(subpart KKK)	60.635(a), (b)

Keep records of leak detection and repair (subpart KKK)	60.632(a),
60.635(a), (b), 60.482-10(l)(3)

60.486(c)

Keep records of design requirements for and operation of closed vent
systems and control devices (subpart KKK)	60.635(a), 60.486(d)

Keep records listing all equipment subject to subpart KKK	60.635(a),
(b), 60.486(e)

Keep records of compliance tests (subpart KKK)	60635(a), 60.486(e)(4)

Keep records of valves designated as unsafe or difficult to monitor
(subpart KKK)	60.635(a), 60486(f)

Keep records of design criterion that indicate failure (subpart KKK)
60.635(a), 60.486(h)

Keep records of parts not in VOC service or otherwise exempt (subpart
KKK)	60.635(a), (c), 60.486(j)

Keep records of calculations and measurements (subpart LLL)	60.647(a)

Facilities that choose to comply with 60.646(e) shall keep, for the life
of the facility, records demonstrating that the facility design capacity
is less that 150 long tons per day of hydrogen sulfide expressed as
sulfur (subpart LLL)	60.647(d)

Electronic Reporting

Some of the respondents are using monitoring equipment that
automatically records parameter data.  Although personnel at the
affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has
significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and
recordkeeping at a plant site.

Also, regulatory agencies in cooperation with the respondents continue
to create reporting systems to transmit data electronically.  However,
electronic reporting systems are still not widely used.  At this time,
it is estimated that approximately 10 percent of the respondents use
electronic reporting.

Respondent Activities

Read instructions.

Write the notification and reports listed above.

Enter information required to be recorded above.

Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and
utilizing technology and systems for the purpose of collecting,
validating, and verifying information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the
purpose of processing and maintaining information.

Develop, acquire, install and utilize technology and systems for the
purpose of disclosing and providing information.

Adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements.

Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information.

Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information.

Perform initial performance test, reference the methods discussed in the
rule language, and repeat performance tests if necessary.  Applicable if
controls are used (subpart KKK).

Monitor control devices to ensure that they are operated and maintained
in conformance with design.  Applicable if controls are used (subpart
KKK).

Perform monthly monitoring of pumps in light liquid service and valves
in gas/vapor service or in light liquid service (subpart KKK).

Repair pump, compressor, valve, and vapor collection system leaks
(subpart KKK).

Perform weekly visual inspections of pumps in light liquid service
(subpart KKK).

Monitor pressure relief devices in gas/vapor service for no detectable
emissions, following pressure release (subpart KKK).

Monitor or repair leaks in pumps or valves in heavy liquid service,
pressure relief devices in light or heavy liquid service, and connectors
(subpart KKK).

Conduct annual inspections of vapor collection systems (subpart KKK).

Install, calibrate, maintain and operate CMS for (a) total sulfur
emission rate and (b) exhaust gas temperature for oxidation control
systems or reduction control systems that are followed by an incinerator
(subpart LLL).

Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate CMS for reduced sulfur
compound emission rate for reduction control systems that are not
followed by an incinerator (subpart LLL)

Perform initial performance test, reference the methods discussed in the
rule language, and repeat performance tests if necessary (subpart LLL).

Perform daily monitoring of (a) accumulation of sulfur product and (b)
H2S Concentration in the acid gas from the sweetening unit (subpart
LLL).

Perform hourly monitoring of acid gas flow rate from the sweetening unit
and calculate the daily average (subpart LLL).

Calculate (a) daily sulfur feed rate and (b) daily required SO2 emission
reduction efficiency (subpart LLL).

	Currently, sources are using monitoring equipment that provides
parameter data in an automated way e.g., continuous parameter monitoring
system.  Although personnel at the source still need to evaluate the
data, this type of monitoring equipment has significantly reduced the
burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping.

5.  The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection
Methodology, and Information Management

5(a)  Agency Activities

EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the
acquisition, analysis, storage, and distribution of the required
information.

Agency Activities

Observe initial performance tests and repeat performance tests if
necessary.

Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports,
excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry.

Audit facility records.

Input, analyze, and maintain data in the Online Tracking Information
System (OTIS).

5(b)  Collection Methodology and Management

Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority might inspect
the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are
properly installed and operational.  Performance test reports are used
by the Agency to discern a source’s initial capability to comply with
the emission standard, and note the operating conditions under which
compliance was achieved.  Data and records maintained by the respondents
are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement
programs.  The semiannual reports are used for problem identification,
as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance
determinations.

Information contained in the reports is entered into OTIS which is
operated and maintained by the EPA Office of Compliance.  OTIS is an EPA
database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance
data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government-owned
facilities.  EPA uses OTIS for tracking air pollution compliance and
enforcement by local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices
and EPA headquarters.  EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit,
store, retrieve and analyze the data.

The records required by this regulation must be retained by the owner or
operator for two years.

5(c)  Small Entity Flexibility

The majority of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large
businesses).  However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small
businesses,) was taken into consideration during the development of the
regulation.  Due to technical considerations involving the process
operations and the types of control equipment employed, the
recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and
large entities.  The Agency considers these to be the minimum
requirements needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce
them further for small entities.  To the extent that larger businesses
can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden
will be reduced.

5(d)  Collection Schedule

The specific frequency for each information collection activity within
this request is shown in Table 1: Annual Industry Burden, NSPS for
Onshore Natural Gas Processing Plants (40 CFR part 60, subparts KKK and
LLL).

6.  Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection

Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the
recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for
the subpart included in this ICR.  The individual burdens are expressed
under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept
of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act.  Wherever appropriate,
specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified.  Responses to
this information collection are mandatory.

The Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB Control Number.

6(a)  Estimating Respondent Burden

The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from
these recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated to be
149,180 (Total Labor Hours from Table 1).  These hours are based on
Agency studies and background documents from the development of the
regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NSPS program, the
previously approved ICR, and any comments received.

6(b)  Estimating Respondent Costs

(i)  Estimating Labor Costs

This ICR uses the following labor rates:

Managerial	$95.32   ($45.39 + 110%)

Technical	$64.60   ($30.76 + 110%)

Clerical	$40.09   ($19.09 + 110%)

These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, December 2003, Table 2.Civilian Workers, by
occupational and industry group.  The rates are from column 1, Total
compensation.  The rates have been increased by 110% to account for the
benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.

(ii)  Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs

The only costs to the regulated industry resulting from information
collection activities required by the subject standard are labor costs.
The type of industry costs associated with the information collection
activities in the subject standard are both labor costs which are
addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs associated with continuous
monitoring.  The capital/startup costs are one-time costs when a
facility becomes subject to the regulation.  The annual operation and
maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor and
other costs such as photocopying and postage.

		 (iii)  Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

(A)

Continuous Monitoring Device	(B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent 1 	(C)

Number of New Respondents	(D)

Total Capital/Startup Cost,  (B X C)	(E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent 1 	(F)

Number of Respondents with O&M 2	(G)

Total O&M,

(E X F)

SO2 CEM, control outlet only for subpart LLL	$73,000 	3	$219,000	$17,100
7	$119,700

    1   Costs reflect installation and maintenance of an in-situ SO2 CEM
after the control device and assume installation occurred during the
construction of the facility.

    2   After consultation with the industry we believe that the number
of respondents needing continuous monitoring is seven.

The total capital/startup costs for this ICR are $219,000.  This is the
total of column D in the above table.

The total operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for this ICR are
$119,700.  This is the total of column G.

The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and
maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the ICR is
estimated to be $338,700.

6(c)  Estimating Agency Burden and Cost

The only costs to the Agency are those costs associated with analysis of
the reported information.  EPA's overall compliance and enforcement
program includes activities such as the examination of records
maintained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of
emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected
information.

The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is
estimated to be $501,916.

This cost is based on the average hourly labor rate as follows:

	Managerial	$54.66 (GS-13, Step 5, $34.16 x 1.6)

	Technical	$40.56 (GS-12, Step 1, $25.35 x 1.6)

	Clerical	$21.95 (GS-6, Step 3, $13.72 x 1.6)

These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 2004
General Schedule which excludes locality rates of pay.  Details upon
which this estimate is based appear in Table 2: Average Annual EPA
Burden, NSPS for Onshore Natural Gas Processing Plants (40 CFR part 60,
subparts KKK and LLL), below.

6(d)  Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

Based on our research for this ICR, on average over the next three
years, approximately 563 existing respondents will be subject to the
standard.  It is estimated that one additional respondent will become
subject to subpart KKK and three for subpart LLL over the next three
years.

The number of respondents is calculated using the following table that
addresses the three years covered by this ICR.

Number of Respondents

Year	(A)

Number of 1 New Respondents	(B)

Number of Existing Respondents	(C)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit
Reports	(D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents	(E)

Number of Respondents

(E=A+B+C-D)

Subpart KKK 2

	1	113	561	0	112	562

2	113	562	0	112	563

3	113	563	0	112	564

Average	113	562	0	112	563

Subpart LLL 3

	1	3	79	3 	0	85

2	3	82	3	0	88

3	3	85	3	0	91

Average	3	82	3	0	88

1 New respondent include sources with constructed, reconstructed and
modified affected facilities.  In this standard existing respondents
submit initial notifications.

2 Based on industry consultation, EPA believes that approximately 20
percent of existing respondents for subpart KKK will construct one new
affected facility per year.

3 Affected facilities with design capacities of less than two long tons
per day of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in the acid gas, expressed as sulfur,
have no reporting requirements pursuant to subpart LLL.  Three
respondents have sources capacities below this threshold.

To avoid double-counting respondents, column D is subtracted.  As shown
above, the average Number of Respondents over the three-year period of
this ICR is 563 (all sources subject to subpart LLL and also subject to
subpart KKK).

The total number of annual responses per year is calculated using the
following table:

Total Annual Responses

(A)

Information Collection Activity	(B)

Number of Respondents	(C)

Number of Responses	(D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit
Reports	(E)

Total Annual Responses

E=(BxC)+D

Subpart KKK

Notification of construction/reconstruction 	57	1	n/a	57

Notification of modification 	56	1	n/a	56

Notification of anticipated startup	113	1	n/a	113

Notification of actual startup	113	1	n/a	113

Notification of demonstration of continuous monitoring system	0	1	n/a	0

Notification of initial performance tests	0	1	n/a	0

Semiannual reports	563	2	n/a	1,126

Subpart LLL

Notification of construction/reconstruction	1.5	1	n/a	1.5

Notification of anticipated startup	3	1	n/a	3

Notification of actual startup	3	1	n/a	3

Notification of initial performance test	3	1	n/a	3

Notification of CMS demonstration	3	1	n/a	3

CMS demonstration report	3	0.2	n/a	0.6

Semiannual report	82	2	n/a	164

	Total (rounded)	1,643

The number of total respondents is 563.

The number of Total Annual Responses is 1,643.  This is the number in
column E of the Respondent Universe and Number of Responses per year in
table above.

The total annual labor costs are $9,518,358.  Details regarding these
estimates may be found in Table 1: Annual Industry Burden, NSPS for
Onshore Natural Gas Processing Plants (40 CFR part 60, subparts KKK and
LLL), below.

6(e)  Bottom Line Burden Hours Burden Hours and Cost Tables

The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the
respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively,
and summarized below.

(i) Respondent Tally

The total annual labor costs are $9,518,358.  Details regarding these
estimates may be found in Table 1. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost:
NSPS for Onshore Natural Gas Processing Plants (40 CFR part 60, subparts
KKK and LLL), below.  Furthermore, the annual public reporting and
recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to
average 91 hours per response.

The total annual capital/startup and O&M cost to the regulated entity
are $338,700.

(ii) The Agency Tally

The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is
estimated to be 12,689 labor hours at a cost of $501,916.  See Table 2.
Annual Agency Burden and Cost: NSPS for Onshore Natural Gas Processing
Plants (40 CFR part 60, subparts KKK and LLL), below.

6(f)  Reasons for Change in Burden

There is no change in the labor hours in this ICR compared to the
previous ICR.  This is due to two considerations.  First, the
regulations have not changed over the past three years and are not
anticipated to change over the next three years.  Secondly, the growth
rate for the industry is very low, negative or non-existent, so there is
not significant change to the overall labor hours.

There is however, an adjustment in the labor hour estimate.  The
previous ICR shows a total of 149,174 annual hours.  This renewal ICR
shows a total of 149,180 annual hours.  The small labor hour increase of
six hours was caused by a mathematical error in the previous ICR.

6(g)  Burden Statement

The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection
of information is estimated to average 91 hours per response.  Burden
means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons
to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency.  This includes the time needed to review
instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and
systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and
providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to
be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or
otherwise disclose the information.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB
Control Number.  The OMB Control Numbers for EPA’s regulations are
listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of
the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques,
EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number
EPA-HQ-OECA-2007-0047.  An electronic version of the public docket is
available at http://www.regulations.gov/ which may be used to obtain a
copy of the draft collection of information, submit or view public
comments, access the index listing of the content of the docket, and to
access those documents in the public docket that are available
electronically.  When in the system, select “search” than key in the
docket ID number identified in this document.  The documents are also
available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket
and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC.  The EPA Docket
Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays.  The telephone number for the
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center Docket is (202)
566-1752.  Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street,
N.W., Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA.  Please
include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2007-0047 and OMB Control
Number 2060-0120 in any correspondence.

Part B of the Supporting Statement

This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in
collecting this information.

Table 1:  Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NSPS for Onshore
Natural Gas Processing Plants (40 CFR part 60, subparts KKK and LLL)

 	(A)	(B)	(C)	(D)	(E)	(F)	(G)	 (H)

 Burden item 	Person- hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per
respondent per year	Person- hours per respondent per year (C=AxB)
Respondents per year (a)	Technical person- hours per year (E=CxD)
Management person-hours per year (Ex0.05)

	Clerical person-hours per year

(Ex0.1)

	Cost ($) (b)

1. Applications	N/A

2. Survey and Studies	N/A

3. Reporting requirements

    A.  Read instructions

         Subpart KKK	1	1	1	563	563	28.2	56.3	$41,315

         Subpart LLL	1	1	1	82	82	4.1	8.2	$6,017

    B.  Required activities

    Subpart KKK

     Notification of construction/

     reconstruction c                             	2	1	2	57	114	5.7	11.4
$8,365

         Notification of modification c	8	1	8	56	448	22.4	44.8	$32,872

         Notification of anticipated startup d	2	1	2	113	226	11.3	22.6
$16,583

         Notification of actual startup d	2	1	2	113	226	11.3	22.6
$16,583

         Notification of electing to comply with

         alternative standards for valves e	8	1	8	0	0	0	0	$0

         Notification of initial performance test f	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

         Semiannual reports g	8	2	16	563	9,008	450.4	900.8	$660,962

    Subpart LLL

         Initial performance test	60	1	60	3	180	9	18	$13,208

        Repeat performance test	60	0.2	12	3	36	1.8	3.6	$2,642

        Demonstration of CEMS	80	0.2	16	3	48	2.4	4.8	$3,522

        Repeat Demonstration of CEMS	80	0.2	16	3	48	2.4	4.8	$3,522

    C.  Create Information

    Subpart KKK

         Initial performance test	N/A

	    Subpart LLL	See 3B

	     D.  Gather existing information

         Subpart KKK	N/A

	         Subpart LLL	See 3B

	     D.  Gather existing information	See 3B

	     E.   Write report

         Subpart KKK 	See 3B

	         Subpart LLL

         Notification of construction/

         reconstruction c          	2	1	2	1.5	3	0.15	0.3	$220

         Notification of modification	N/A

	         Notification of anticipated startup h	2	1	2	3	6	0.3	0.6	$440

 Notification of actual startup h	2	1	2	3	6	0.3	0.6	$440

 Notification of initial performance test h	2	1	2	3	6	0.3	0.6	$440

 Notification of CMS demonstration h                               	2	1
2	3	6	0.3	0.6	$440

 CMS demonstration
                    	See 3B

	 Semiannual report i	40	2	80	82	6,560	328	656	$481,340

4.  Recordkeeping requirements

  A.  Read instructions

       Subpart KKK	See 4C

	       Subpart LLL	See 3A

	      B.  Plan activities	See 3E

           Subpart KKK	See 4C

	           Subpart LLL	N/A

	      C.  Implement activities	See 3E

           Subpart KKK

           Filing and maintaining records j	80	1	80	563	45,040	2,252
4,504	$3,304,810

           Startup, shutdown, or malfunction k	80	1	80	112	8,960	448	896
$657,440

           Recalibrate monitors	4	12	48	563	27,024	1,351.2	2,702.4
$1,982,886

           Method 21 performance evaluation	2	2	4	563	2,252	112.6	225.2
$165,241

           Subpart LLL	N/A

	  D.  Develop record system

       Subpart KKK	See 4C

	       Subpart LLL l	40	1	40	3	120	6	12	$8,805

      E.  Time to enter information

           Subpart KKK	See 4C

	          Subpart LLL

          Records of startup, shutdown, or

          malfunction	1.5	12	18	3	54	2.7	5.4	$3,962

          Records of continuous recording	0.5	700	350	82	28,700	1,435
2,870	$2,105,863

          Records of capacity data	2	1	2	3	6	0.3	0.6	$440

      F.  Train personnel

          Subpart KKK	See 4C

	          Subpart LLL	N/A

	     G.  Audits

      Subpart KKK	N/A

	      Subpart LLL	N/A

	Subtotal

	129,722	6,486.15	12,972.2	$9,518,358

TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)

149,180

  $9,518,358

Assumptions:

a.  We have assumed that the average number of respondents that will be
subject to subpart KKK will be 563 with one new source becoming subject
to the rule over the three-year period of this ICR.  It is also assumed
that the overage number of respondents that will be subject to subpart
LLL will be 82 with one additional source becoming subject to the rule
over the three-year period of this ICR.

b.  This ICR uses the following labor rates: $95.32 per hour for
Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $64.60 per hour for
Technical labor, and $40.09 per hour for Clerical labor.  These rates
are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, December 2003, “Table 2.  Civilian Workers, by
occupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1,
“Total compensation.”  The rates have been increased by 110 percent
to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by
private industry.

c.  We have assumed that one-half of new facilities are the result of
construction or reconstruction, while the other half are the result of
modifications of existing facilities.

d.  We have assumed that 20 percent of existing respondents will
construct one new facility per year.

e.  We have assumed that no respondent is expected to use the
alternative standards.

f.   We have assumed that while this subpart includes the option of
using closed vent systems and control devices to demonstrate compliance,
no respondent is expected to use this option.  Therefore, no respondent
is expected to submit the associated notifications and reports.

g.  We have assumed that each respondent will take 8 hours two times per
year to write semiannual reports.

h.  We have assumed that each respondent will take two hours to complete
reports.

i.  We have assumed that each respondent will take 40 hours two times
per year to write semiannual reports.

j.  We have assumed that each respondent will take 80 hours to file and
maintain records.

k.  We have assumed that 20 percent of respondents will take 80 hours to
implement this activity.

l.  We have assumed that each respondent will take 40 hours to develop
record system.

Table 2:  Average Annual EPA Burden – NSPS for Onshore Natural Gas
Processing Plants (40 CFR part 60, subparts KKK and LLL)

 	(A)	(B)	(C)	(D)	(E)	(F)	(G)	 (H)

Activity 	EPA person- hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per plant

per year	EPA person- hours per plant per year (C=AxB)	Plants per year
(a)	Technical person- hours per year (E=CxD)	Management person-hours per
year (Ex0.05)

	Clerical person-hours per year

(Ex0.1)

	Cost ($) (b)

Subpart KKK

     Notification of construction/

     reconstruction c	2	1	2	56	112	5.6	11.2	$5,095

     Review notification of modification c	2	1	2	56	112	5.6	11.2	$5,095

     Review notification of anticipated

     startup d	2	1	2	112	224	11.2	22.4	$10,189

     Review notification of actual startup d	2	1	2	112	224	11.2	22.4
$10,189

     Notification of demonstration of CEMS	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

     Review initial CEMS demonstration

     report	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

     Review notification of performance

     test	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

     Review results of performance test	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

 Review semiannual reports e                           	8	2	16	563	9,008
450.4	900.8	$409,756

Subpart LLL

    Review notification of construction/

    reconstruction f	2	1	2	1.5	3	0.15	0.3	$137

    Review notification of modification f	2	1	2	1.5	3	0.15	0.3	$137

    Review notification of anticipated

    startup g	2	1	2	3	6	0.3	0.6	$273

    Review notification of actual startup g	2	1	2	3	6	0.3	0.6	$273

    Review notification of demonstration of

    CEMS g	2	1	2	3	6	0.3	0.6	$273

    Review of CEMS demonstration report g	2	1	2	3	6	0.3	0.6	$273

    Review notification of initial

    performance test g	2	1	2	3	6	0.3	0.6	$273

    Review of semiannual reports e	8	2	16	82	1,312	65.6	131.2	$59.680

Review results of performance test	2	1	2	3	6	0.3	0.6	$273

TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)

12,689

$501,916

Assumptions:

a.  We have assumed that the average number of respondents that will be
subject to subpart KKK will be 563 with one new source becoming subject
to the rule over the three-year period of this ICR.  It is also assumed
that the average number of respondents that will be subject to subpart
LLL will be 82 with one additional source becoming subject to the rule
over the three-year period of this ICR.

b.  The cost is based on the following labor rate which incorporates a
1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead
expenses.  Managerial rates of $54.66 (GS-13, Step 5, $34.16x1.6),
Technical rate of $40.56 (GS-12, Step 1, $25.35 x 1.6), and Clerical
rate of $21.95 (GS-6, Step 3, $13.72 x 1.6).  These rates are from the
Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2004 General Schedule” which
excludes locality rates of pay.

c.  We have assumed that one-half of new facilities are the result of
construction or reconstruction, while the other half are the result of
modifications of existing facilities.

d. We have assumed that 20 percent of respondents will each take two
hours to review notifications.

e.  We have assumed that it will take each respondent eight hours two
time per year to review semiannual reports.

f.  We have assumed that one-half of new respondents will review
notification of construction/reconstruction and the other half will
review notification of modification.

g.  We have assumed that each of the new respondents will take two hour
to review notification.

 PAGE

 PAGE   14

 PAGE


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43487-43488]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17985]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 25, 2012 /
Rules and Regulations

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Parts 240 and 249

[Release No. 34-67286A; File No. S7-44-10]
RIN 3235-AK87

Process for Submissions for Review of Security-Based Swaps for
Mandatory Clearing and Notice Filing Requirements for Clearing
Agencies; Technical Amendments to Rule 19b-4 and Form 19b-4 Applicable
to All Self-Regulatory Organizations; Correction

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction; clarification.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 13, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') published a document in the Federal Register (77 FR
41602), concerning, among other things, the process for submissions for
review of security-based swaps for mandatory clearing and notice filing
requirements for clearing agencies. The document contained
typographical errors in the preamble and in the general authority for
Part 240. The Commission is publishing corrections to the preamble and
the general authority as well as a clarification concerning the Office
of Management and Budget (``OMB'') control number for Rule 3Ca-1 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'').

DATES: Effective on August 13, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine Moore, Senior Special
Counsel, Kenneth Riitho, Special Counsel or Andrew Bernstein, Special
Counsel, at<PHONE_NUMBER>; Division of Trading and Markets, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-7010.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of July 13, 2012, in FR Doc. 2012-16233,
the following corrections are made:

0
1. On page, 41627 in the third line of the third column remove ``3''
and add in its place ``10.''
0
2. On page, 41631 in the 40th line of the third column remove ``3'' and
add in its place ``10.''
0
3. On page, 41632 in the 32nd line of the first column remove ``3'' and
add in its place ``10.''
0
4. On page, 41645 in the 23rd line of the third column remove
``Security-Based Swap Submissions'' after the phrase, ``mandate to
submit'' and add in its place ``Advance Notices.''
    5. On page, 41646 in the 57th line of the first column remove
``14'' after the phrase, ``resulting in a total annual burden of'' and
add in its place ``16.''

PART 240--[CORRECTED]

0
6. On page 41647, in the 24th line from the bottom of the third column,
the general authority citation for part 240 is corrected to read as
follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77c, 77d, 77g, 77j, 77s, 77z-2, 77z-3,
77eee, 77ggg, 77nnn, 77sss, 77ttt, 78c, 78c-3, 78d, 78e, 78f, 78g,
78i, 78j, 78j-1, 78k, 78k-1, 78l, 78m, 78n, 78n-1, 78o, 78o-4, 78p,
78q, 78s, 78u-5, 78w, 78x, 78ll, 78mm, 80a-20, 80a-23, 80a-29, 80a-
37, 80b-3, 80b-4, 80b-11, and 7201 et seq.; 18 U.S.C. 1350, 12
U.S.C. 5221(e)(3), and Sec. 939A, Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376,
(2010), unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *

Clarification

    On page 41627, in the 14th line from the bottom of the first
column, it states: ``Finally, the Commission has submitted a new
collection of information titled `Rule 3Ca-1 Stay of Clearing
Requirement and Review by the Commission under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934' to OMB for review in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 3507 and 5
CFR 1320.11. OMB has not yet assigned a control number to the new
collection of information.'' The Commission has submitted the
collection of information under Rule 3Ca-1 as part of the collection of
information in ``Rule 19b-4 Filings with Respect to Proposed Rule
Changes by Self-Regulatory Organizations'' (OMB Control No. 3235-0045),
so a new control number for the information collection request under
Rule 3Ca-1 will not be assigned. We provide below a clarification of
why the information collection request under Rule 3Ca-1 was submitted
under OMB Control No. 3235-0045:
    Section 3C of the Exchange Act, as added by Section 763(a) of the
Dodd-Frank Act (``Exchange Act Section 3C'') requires each clearing
agency that plans to accept a security-based swap (or any group,
category, type or class of security-based swaps) for clearing to submit
such security-based swap to the Commission (referred to herein as a
``Security-Based Swap Submission'') for a determination by the
Commission of whether the security-based swap (or any group, category,
type or class of security-based swaps) referenced in the submission is
required to be cleared.\1\ The amendments to Rule 19b-4 and Form 19b-4
will require, among other things, that clearing agencies file Security-
Based Swap Submissions and any related information electronically with
the Commission on Form 19b-4 using the existing Electronic Form 19b-4
Filing System.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 15 U.S.C. 78c-3(b)(2)(A) (as added by Section 763(a) of
the Dodd-Frank Act).
    \2\ See Process for Submissions for Review of Security-Based
Swaps for Mandatory Clearing and Notice Filing Requirements for
Clearing Agencies; Technical Amendments to Rule 19b-4 and Form 19b-4
Applicable to All Self-Regulatory Organizations, Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 67286 (June 28, 2012), 77 FR 41602 (July 13, 2012)
(``Adopting Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Exchange Act Section 3C also provides that after making a mandatory
clearing determination, the Commission, on application of a
counterparty to a security-based swap (or group, category, type, or
class of security-based swaps), or on its own initiative, may stay the
clearing requirement.\3\ The Commission adopted new Rule 3Ca-1 to
establish the procedure by which the Commission may stay the
requirement that a security-based swap is subject to mandatory clearing
while the clearing of the security-based swap is reviewed.\4\ The
collection of information required by new Rule 3Ca-1 will be used by
the Commission to determine whether to grant the stay of the clearing
requirement sought by a counterparty and to review whether the clearing
requirement will continue to apply to the security-based swap (or
group,

category, type, or class of security-based swaps) referenced in the
application for a stay. \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See 15 U.S.C. 78c-3(c)(1) (as added by Section 763(a) of the
Dodd-Frank Act).
    \4\ See Adopting Release, 77 FR 41618.
    \5\ See Adopting Release, 77 FR 41628.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After reviewing the collection of information requirements for the
amendments to Rule 19b-4 and Form 19b-4 and for new Rule 3Ca-1, the
Commission believes that the procedures for reviewing Security-Based
Swaps Submissions and applications for a stay from a mandatory clearing
requirement are so closely connected that the collection of information
should be included in a single submission to OMB. Specifically, the
number of applications for a stay from a mandatory clearing requirement
will, at least in part, be dependent on the number of mandatory
clearing determinations the Commission makes pursuant to a Security-
Based Swap Submission filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4 and on Form 19b-
4.\6\ In estimating the collection of information requirement related
to new Rule 3Ca-1, the Commission drew a comparison between the amount
of time it would take for a clearing agency to prepare a Security-Based
Swap Submission and the amount of time it would take a counterparty to
prepare an application of a stay of a clearing requirement, given that
each filing would likely address similar issues related to the clearing
of the particular security-based swap.\7\ In addition, the Commission
believes that an application for a stay will take less time to prepare
than a new submission, due to the fact that some of the information
addressed in the application for a stay will have already been provided
with the Security-Based Swap Submission when it was published for
notice and comment.\8\ Accordingly, the Commission believes that the
collection of information that is required in connection with a request
for a stay under new Rule 3Ca-1 is interrelated to the collection of
information under Rule 19b-4 and Form 19b-4 and should not be treated
as a separate collection of information. For that reason, the
Commission has submitted the collection of information under Rule 3Ca-1
as part of the collection of information in ``Rule 19b-4 Filings with
Respect to Proposed Rule Changes by Self-Regulatory Organizations''
(OMB Control No. 3235-0045).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Adopting Release, 77 FR 41634.
    \7\ Id.
    \8\ Id.

     Dated: July 19, 2012.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-17985 Filed 7-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 5, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60356-60357]
[FR Doc No: 2022-21513]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1207; Airspace Docket No. 22-ANE-9]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of Class D and Class E Airspace; Manchester
and Nashua, NH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class E surface airspace, Class
E airspace designated as an extension to a Class C surface area, and
Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at
Manchester Boston Regional Airport (formerly Manchester Airport),
Manchester, NH, and update the airport's geographic coordinates. Also,
this action proposes to amend Class D airspace, Class E airspace
designated as an extension to Class D surface area, and Class E
airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Boire
Field Airport (formerly Boire Field), by updating each airport's name
and, and removing unnecessary verbiage from the airport description.
Controlled airspace is necessary for the safety and management of
instrument flight rules (IFR) operations in the area.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 21, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to: the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify the
Docket No. FAA-2022-1207; Airspace Docket No. 22-ANE-9 at the beginning
of your comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at
www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11G Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; Telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority,
as it would amend airspace in Manchester and Nashua, NH, to support IFR
operations in the area.

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to comment on this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (Docket No. FAA-
2022-1207 and Airspace Docket No. 22-ANE-9) and be submitted in
triplicate to DOT Docket Operations (see ADDRESSES section for the
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
internet at www.regulations.gov.
    Persons wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on
this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2022-1207; Airspace Docket No. 22-ANE-9.'' The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this document may be changed in light of the
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the comment
closing date. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined between 8:00 a.m. and
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays at the office
of the Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, Room
350, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19, 2022, and effective
September 15, 2022. FAA Order JO 7400.11G is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11G
lists

Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA proposes an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to Class E surface
airspace, Class E airspace designated as an extension to a Class C
surface area, and Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface at Manchester Boston Regional Airport (formerly Manchester
Airport) Manchester, NH, and update this airport's geographic
coordinates to coincide with the FAA's database. Also, this action
proposes to amend Class D airspace, Class E airspace designated as an
extension to Class D surface area, and Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at Boire Field Airport (formerly
Boire Field), by updating each airport's name, and removing unnecessary
verbiage from the airport description, as per Order JO 7400.2N. This
action would also replace the term Notice to Airmen with the term
Notice to Air Missions, and the term Airport/Facility Directory with
the term Chart Supplement in the airspace descriptions.
    Class E airspace designations are published in Paragraphs 5000,
6002, 6003, 6004, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order JO 7400.11G,
dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15, 2022, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
FAA Order JO 7400.11.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'', prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15, 2022, is
amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ANE NH D Nashua, NH [Amended]

Boire Field Airport, NH
    (Lat. 42[deg]46'57'' N, long. 71[deg]30'51'' W)
Pepperell Airport, MA
    (Lat. 42[deg]41'46'' N, long. 71[deg]33'00'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
2,700 feet MSL within a 5-mile radius of Boire Field Airport;
excluding that airspace within a 2-mile radius of Pepperell Airport.
This Class D airspace area is effective during the specific dates
and times established in advance by a Notice to Air Missions. The
effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in
the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6002 Class E Surface Airspace.

* * * * *

ANE NH E2 Manchester, NH [Amended]

Manchester Boston Regional Airport, NH
    (Lat. 42[deg]55'58'' N, long. 71[deg]26'09'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from surface the within a 5-mile
radius of the Manchester Boston Regional Airport. This Class E
airspace area is effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to Air Missions. The effective
date and time will thereafter be continuously published in the Chart
Supplement.

Paragraph 6003 Class E Airspace Designated as an Extension to Class
C Area.

* * * * *

ANE NH E3 Manchester, NH [Amended]

Manchester Boston Regional Airport, NH
    (Lat. 42[deg]55'58'' N, long. 71[deg]26'09'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 3.3-miles
each side of the 337[deg] bearing of Manchester Boston Regional
Airport extending from the 5-mile radius to 8.5-miles northwest of
the airport.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Designated as an Extension to Class
D Surface Area.

* * * * *

ANE NH E4 Nashua, NH [Amended]

Boire Field Airport, NH
    (Lat. 42[deg]46'57'' N, long. 71[deg]30'51'' W)
Manchester VOR/DME
    (Lat. 42[deg]52'07'' N, long. 71[deg]22'10'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 1.1 miles
on each side of the Manchester VOR/DME 231[deg] radial extending
from the 5-mile radius to 8.4 miles northeast of Boire Field
Airport.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ANE NH E5 Nashua, NH [Amended]

Boire Field Airport, NH
    (Lat. 42[deg]46'57'' N, long. 71[deg]30'51'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7.9-mile radius of Boire Field Airport.

ANE NH E5 Manchester, NH [Amended]

Manchester Boston Regional Airport, NH
    (Lat. 42[deg]55'58'' N, long. 71[deg]26'09'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 23-mile radius of the Manchester Boston Regional Airport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on September 29, 2022.
Lisa Burrows,
Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team North, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization
[FR Doc. 2022-21513 Filed 10-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


MEMORANDUM

DATE: 3/02/2015

FROM: 		Angela Hackel; OAR

TO:CLEAN POWER PLAN FOR EXISTING POWER PLANTS; DOCKET ID: OAR - 2013-0602

SUBJECT:DOCKETING Of Materials

SUMMARY:

In a call held on 2/26/2015, EPA discussed the upcoming Clean Power Plan with community stakeholders.
ATTENDEES:

The attached spreadsheet lists the attendees that participated in the call. In addition to those listed the following EPA staff from the Office of Air and Radiation were present on the call:

-Janet McCabe
-Kevin Culligan
-Holly Wilson
-Angela Hackel
-Erika Wilson
-Andrea Drinkard