[Federal Register: December 9, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 236)]
[Notices]
[Page 73221-73222]
[DOCID:fr09de05-61]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 459-143; Docket No. EL05-73-003]

Duncan's Point Lot Owners Association, Inc.; Duncan's Point
Homeowners Association, Inc. and Nancy A. Brunson, Juanita Brackens,
Helen Davis, and Pearl Hankins, Individually v. Union Electric Company
d/b/a AmerenUE; Notice Dismissing Complaint as Premature

December 1, 2005.
    On November 14, 2005, Duncan's Point Lot Owners Association, Inc.,
Duncan's Point Homeowners Association, Inc., Nancy A. Brunson, Juanita
Brackens, Helen Davis, and Pearl Hankins (Complainants) filed what they
termed a formal complaint against Union Electric Company, doing
business as AmerenUE, licensee of the Osage Hydroelectric Project No.
459. The project is located on the Lake of the Ozarks in Missouri.
Complainants allege that the licensee has failed or refused to comply
with the Commission staff's letter order of September 7, 2004, and the
Commission's order of May 9, 2005 (111 FERC ] 61,190). In support, they
raise issues concerning the Commission staff's site visit report of
July 29, 2005, and the licensee's compliance filing of October 14,
2005.
    On September 15, 2005, the Commission denied Complainants' request
for rehearing of the Commission's May 9 order. See 112 FERC ] 61,289.
Therefore, the issues resolved in that decision are final and may not
be the subject of a new complaint. On September 1, 2005, Commission
staff issued a letter order concerning some outstanding compliance
issues concerning the project. On September 30, 2005, Complainants
filed a request for rehearing of staff's September 1 letter order.
    The issues raised in Complainants filing of November 14, 2005,
either relate to an ongoing compliance proceeding for which Commission
staff

has not yet completed its determinations, or are the subject of
Complainants' request for rehearing of staff's letter order of
September 1, 2005.\1\ As such, they are not yet final and are not
properly the subject of a formal complaint. Accordingly, the complaint
is dismissed as premature. Complainants will have an opportunity to
seek further relief after the pending staff and Commission actions have
been completed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ To the extent that Complainants seek to raise issues
regarding the conduct of the Commission or its staff, these matters
are outside the scope of the Commission's complaint process. See 18
CFR 385.206(a).

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E5-7093 Filed 12-8-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 160 (Friday, August 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 51089]
[FR Doc No: 2022-17874]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator and Foreign
Utility Company Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cutlass Solar LLC........................  EG22-109-000
SJRR Power LLC...........................  EG22-110-000
Victoria Port Power II...................  EG22-111-000
Yapkank Fuel Cell Park, LLC..............  EG22-112-000
Vansycle II Wind, LLC....................  EG22-113-000
Great Prairie Wind, LLC..................  EG22-114-000
Tres Bahias Solar Power, LLC.............  EG22-115-000
Ocean State BTM, LLC.....................  EG22-116-000
Rumford ESS, LLC.........................  EG22-117-000
Madison BTM, LLC.........................  EG22-118-000
South Portland ESS, LLC..................  EG22-119-000
Sandford ESS, LLC........................  EG22-120-000
Madison ESS, LLC.........................  EG22-121-000
AE-ESS NWS 1, LLC........................  EG22-122-000
Shakes Solar, LLC........................  EG22-123-000
Great Pathfinder Wind, LLC...............  EG22-124-000
Jackpot Holdings LLC.....................  EG22-125-000
Fence Post Solar Project, LLC............  EG22-126-000
Ganado Solar, LLC........................  EG22-127-000
Stampede Solar Project, LLC..............  EG22-128-000
Sierra Energy Storage, LLC...............  EG22-129-000
Madison Fields Solar Project, LLC........  EG22-130-000
Marion County Solar Project, LLC.........  EG22-131-000
Tres City Power LLC......................  EG22-132-000
Wolf Tank Storage LLC....................  EG22-133-000
Tres Port Power LLC......................  EG22-134-000
BillerudKorsn[auml]s Sweden AB...........  FC22-2-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of July 2022, the status of the
above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign
Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's
regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) (2021).

    Dated: August 15, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-17874 Filed 8-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


                 United States Environmental Protection Agency                                                                    Administrative Index for                        NPRM action EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0140                                         Revision to the South Coast Portion of the California Implementation Plan,  South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Rule 1315, Federal New Source Review Tracking System

      	Docket Index        Category/ Item 	Number

I.	SIP Submittal Documents

# SIP Submittal Letter, from CARB, March 2, 2011 I-A # Board Resolution, passed February 4, 2011 I-B # Rule 1315 Federal New Source Review Tracking System, adopted February 4, 2011 I-C # Staff Report: Proposed Rule 1315  -  Federal New Source Review Tracking System, January 7, 2011 I-D # District Submittal Letter, February 11, 2011 I-E # SIP Submittal Supplement, from CARB, February 7, 2012  I-F

II.	Federal Register Notices

# 57 FR 13502, April 16. 1992 II-A # 61 FR 64291, December 4, 1996 II-B

III.	Other Relevant Documents

# Submittal Completeness Letter, March 25, 2011 III-A # Technical Support Document for NPRM EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0140 III-B # Technical Support Document for EPA's Notice of Final Rulemaking for the California State Implementation Plan, AQMD New Source Review, October 29, 1996 III-C # Proposed NSR Offset Tracking System, October 14, 2005 III-D # SCAQMD's Revised NSR Tracking System letter, February 24, 2006 III-E # SCAQMD's Revised NSR Offset Tracking System, February 23, 2006 III-F # EPA Letter from Deborah Jordan to Dr. Barry Wallerstein, April 11, 2006 III-G # Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization, Federal Reserve Bulletin, August, 2009 III-H # Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization: 2010 Annual Revision, Federal Reserve Statistical Release, June 25, 2010 III-I # Proposed Rule 1315 Adopted September 8, 2006 III-J # EPA's Petition Response, September 23, 2010 III-K # Chapter 3, AQMD's 2003 Attainment Plan (PM10) III-L # Appendix III, AQMD's 2003 Attainment Plan (PM10) III-M # Chapter 3, AQMD's 2007 Attainment Plan (ozone) III-N # Appendix III, AQMD's 2007 Attainment Plan (ozone) III-O # Breakdown of 2020 Stationary Source Baseline Emissions, with Growth, from 2007 Attainment Plan III-P # Breakdown of 2020 Stationary Source Baseline Emissions, with No Growth, from 2007 Attainment Plan III-Q # EPA Analysis of Table 5 Data from Proposed Rule 1315 Staff Report III-R # Annual Equivalency Report, approved by AQMD board February 14, 1997 III-S # Annual Equivalency Report, approved by AQMD board March 13, 1998 III-T # Annual Equivalency Report, approved by AQMD board April 9, 1999 III-U # Annual Equivalency Report, approved by AQMD board August 18, 2000 III-V # Annual Equivalency Report, approved by AQMD board November 9, 2001 III-W # Annual Equivalency Report, approved by AQMD board August 2, 2002 III-X # Annual Equivalency Report, approved by AQMD board April 2, 2004 III-Y # Breakdown of 2010 Stationary Source Baseline Emissions, with Growth, from 2003 Attainment Plan III-Z # Breakdown of 2010 Stationary Source Baseline Emissions, with No Growth, from 2003 Attainment Plan III-AA

IV.	EPA Rulemaking Documents

# Federal Register Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Pre-publication Version, February 9, 2012 IV-A     IV-B

Notes:	    1. All documents, unless otherwise noted, are available on the internet at Regulations.gov under Docket # EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0140 or at the EPA Region 9 offices.    2. Copies of all documents in the docket are located at EPA Region 9 offices.     3. Full versions of AQMD's 2003 and 2007 attainment plans can be downloaded from: http://www.aqmd.gov/aqmp/AQMPintro.htm    4. AQMD's current and proposed regulations can be downloaded from: http://www.aqmd.gov/rules/rulesreg.html


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 212 (Monday, November 2, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 69126-69129]
[FR Doc No: 2020-23976]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0585; Product Identifier 2019-SW-112-AD; Amendment
39-21297; AD 2020-22-01]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Helicopters Model AS332C, AS332C1, AS332L, and AS332L1
helicopters. This AD requires inspecting the affected parts and
associated frame bores for discrepancies, applicable corrective
actions, and reporting certain information if necessary. This AD was
prompted by reports of corrosion on attachment screws and fittings
fastening the main gearbox (MGB) suspension bars to the fuselage. The
actions of this AD are intended to address an unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: This AD is effective December 7, 2020.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain documents listed in this AD as of December 7,
2020.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX
75052; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; or at
https://www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/technical-support.html. You
may view the referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. It is also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0585.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0585; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this AD, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, any
service information that is incorporated by reference, any comments
received, and other

information. The street address for Docket Operations is U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace
Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-
3218; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Airbus Helicopters
Model AS332C, AS332C1, AS332L, and AS332L1 helicopters. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on July 20, 2020 (85 FR 43749). The
NPRM proposed to require accomplishing actions specified in the service
information and sending certain inspection results to the manufacturer.
    The NPRM was prompted by EASA AD No. 2019-0295, dated December 5,
2019, issued by EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member
States of the European Union, to correct an unsafe condition for all
Airbus Helicopters Model AS332C, AS332C1, AS332L, and AS332L1
helicopters. EASA advises that there were reports of corrosion on
attachment screws and fittings fastening the rear MGB suspension bars,
right and left hand sides, to the fuselage, and the attachment screws
and fitting fastening the front MGB suspension bar to the fuselage.
Subsequent investigation determined that during maintenance visits of
an identified batch of helicopters between September 2012 and April
2019, application of compound sealant on MGB suspension bar attachment
screws may not have been accomplished using the approved maintenance
data. The EASA AD requires a one-time inspection of the affected parts,
and depending on findings, accomplishment of applicable corrective
actions. The compliance times vary depending on helicopter
configuration.
    For helicopters identified in Airbus Helicopters Alert Service
Bulletin (ASB) AS332-53.02.05, Revision 1, dated March 2, 2020, the
earliest inspection compliance time is within 100 flight hours or 6
months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first. For
helicopters identified in Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332-53.02.07,
Revision 0, dated October 21, 2019, the earliest inspection compliance
time is within 100 flight hours after the effective date of this AD.
    For helicopters identified in Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332-
53.02.05, Revision 1, dated March 2, 2020, the latest initial
inspection compliance time is within 3,800 flight hours or 3 years and
6 months, whichever occurs first, since the last maintenance action at
Airbus Helicopters Marignane. For helicopters identified in Airbus
Helicopters ASB AS332-53.02.07, Revision 0, dated October 21, 2019, the
latest initial inspection compliance time is within 3,800 flight hours
since last removal.
    The FAA is issuing this AD to address corrosion on attachment
fittings and attachment screws for the MGB suspension bars. This
condition, if not addressed, could lead to structural failure of the
MGB attachment screws, resulting in detachment of MGB suspension bars
from the fuselage and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Comments

    The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule, but the FAA did not receive any comments on
the NPRM or on the determination of the cost to the public.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by EASA and is approved for
operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral
agreement with the European Union, EASA has notified the FAA of the
unsafe condition described in its AD. The FAA is issuing this AD after
evaluating all of the information provided by EASA and determining the
unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of these same type design.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus Helicopters has issued ASB No. AS332-53.02.05, Revision 1,
dated March 2, 2020; and ASB No. AS332-53.02.07, Revision 0, dated
October 21, 2019, which specify procedures for inspecting the
attachment fittings and attachment screws of the MGB suspension bars
and their frame bores for discrepancies and corrective actions. This
inspection includes an inspection of the attachment fittings and
attachment screws of the MGB suspension bars for corrosion and an
inspection of the attachment screws for evidence of sealing compound.
The corrective actions include replacing or repairing corroded parts
and replacing screws that have sealing compound on them. These
documents are distinct since they apply to different helicopter models
in different configurations.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Other Related Service Information

    Airbus Helicopters has also issued ASB No. AS332-53.02.05, Revision
0, dated April 18, 2019, which specifies procedures for inspecting the
attachment fittings and attachment screws of the MGB suspension bars
and their frame bores for discrepancies and corrective actions.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 12 helicopters of U.S.
Registry. Labor rates are estimated at $85 per work-hour. Based on
these numbers, the FAA estimates that operators may incur the following
costs in order to comply with this AD. To comply with this AD, the FAA
estimates that it will take up to about 16 work-hours, for an estimated
cost of $1,360 per helicopter and $16,320 for the U.S. fleet. The FAA
estimates that it will take about 1 hour per helicopter to comply with
the on-condition reporting requirement in this AD.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public
reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be
approximately 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Send comments regarding this burden estimate
or any other aspect of this collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collection
Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on helicopters identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2020-22-01 Airbus Helicopters: Amendment 39-21297; Docket No. FAA-
2020-0585; Product Identifier 2019-SW-112-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective December 7,
2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Airbus Helicopters Model AS332C, AS332C1,
AS332L, and AS332L1 helicopters, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 5340, Fuselage
main, attach fittings.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of corrosion on attachment
screws and fittings fastening the main gearbox (MGB) suspension bars
to the fuselage. The FAA is issuing this AD to address corrosion on
attachment fittings and attachment screws for the MGB suspension
bars. This condition, if not addressed, could lead to structural
failure of the MGB attachment screws, resulting in detachment of MGB
suspension bars from the fuselage and subsequent loss of control of
the helicopter.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.

(g) Definitions

    Affected parts are attachment screws and fitting(s) fastening
the parts identified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this AD.
    (1) Rear MGB suspension bars, right and left sides, to the
fuselage.
    (2) Front MGB suspension bar to the fuselage.

(h) Inspection

    Except as specified in paragraphs (j)(1) through (3) of this AD:
Within the applicable compliance times identified in paragraph
(h)(1) or (2) of this AD, inspect each affected part and its frame
bores for discrepancies, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, Section 3.B.2, of Airbus Helicopters Alert Service
Bulletin (ASB) AS332-53.02.05, Revision 1, dated March 2, 2020; or
Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332-53.02.07, Revision 0, dated October 21,
2019, as applicable. For the purposes of this inspection, a
discrepancy may be indicated by corrosion on the MGB attachment
fitting or by sealing compound on the attachment screws.
    (1) Table 1 or 2, as applicable, of Section 1.E.2, ``Compliance
in service,'' of Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332-53.02.05, Revision 1,
dated March 2, 2020.
    (2) Table 1 of Section 1.E.2, ``Compliance in service,'' of
Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332-53.02.07, dated October 21, 2019.

(i) Corrective Action

    Except as required by paragraph (j)(4) of this AD: If, during
the inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD, there is any
discrepancy, before further flight, do the applicable corrective
action (including replacing or repairing corroded parts and
replacing screws that have sealing compound on them), in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions, Section 3.B.2, of Airbus
Helicopters ASB AS332-53.02.05, Revision 1, dated March 2, 2020; or
ASB AS332-53.02.07, Revision 0, dated October 21, 2019, as
applicable.

 (j) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications

    (1) Where Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332-53.02.05, Revision 1,
dated March 2, 2020, uses the phrase ``Revision 0 of this ASB issued
on April 18, 2019,'' this AD requires using ``the effective date of
this AD.''
    (2) Where Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332-53.02.07, Revision 0,
dated October 21, 2019, uses the phrase ``receipt of this ASB,''
this AD requires using ``the effective date of this AD.''
    (3) Where Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332-53.02.05, Revision 1,
dated March 2, 2020; and ASB AS332-53.02.07, Revision 0, dated
October 21, 2019, specify discarding parts, you are not required to
discard parts.
    (4) Where Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332-53.02.05, Revision 1,
dated March 2, 2020; and ASB AS332-53.02.07, Revision 0, dated
October 21, 2019, specify contacting Airbus Helicopters for repair
instructions: This AD requires repair using a method approved by the
Manager, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA. The Manager's approval
letter must specifically refer to this AD.

(k) Reporting

    If, during the inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD,
there is any discrepancy, report the inspection results to Airbus
Helicopters at the applicable time specified in paragraph (k)(1) or
(2) of this AD. The report should include the information specified
in Appendix 4.A. of Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332-53.02.05, Revision
1, dated March 2, 2020; or ASB AS332-53.02.07, Revision 0, dated
October 21, 2019, as applicable.
    (1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
    (2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this
AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the effective date of
this AD.

(l) Credit for Previous Actions

    For helicopters identified in Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332-
53.02.05, Revision 1, dated March 2, 2020: This paragraph provides
credit for actions required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if
those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD
using Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332-53.02.05, Revision 0, dated April
18, 2019.

(m) Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to

respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection
of information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. The
OMB Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0056.
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 1 hour per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering
and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Send comments regarding this burden
estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information
Collection Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.

(n) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, may approve
AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to: Manager, Rotorcraft
Standards Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, the FAA suggests
that you notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office
or certificate holding district office, before operating any
aircraft complying with this AD through an AMOC.

(o) Related Information

    (1) The subject of this AD is addressed in European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2019-0295, dated December 5,
2019. You may view the EASA AD on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FAA-2020-0585.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; or at
https://www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/technical-support.html.
You may view a copy of the service information at the FAA, Office of
the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room
6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

(p) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) AS332-
53.02.05, Revision 1, dated March 2, 2020.
    (ii) Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332-53.02.07, Revision 0, dated
October 21, 2019.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; or at
https://www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/technical-support.html.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Office of
the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room
6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on October 13, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-23976 Filed 10-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35950-35951]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15467]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0401; FRL-9929-55-OAR]

Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request;
Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: RFS Pathways II, and Technical
Amendments to the RFS Standards and E15 Misfueling Mitigation
Requirements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to
submit an information collection request (ICR), ``Regulation of Fuels
and Fuel Additives: RFS Pathways II, and Technical Amendments to the
RFS Standards and E15 Misfueling Mitigation Requirement'' (EPA ICR No.
2520.01., OMB Control No. 2060-NEW to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Before doing so, EPA is
soliciting public comments on specific aspects of the proposed
information collection as described below. This is a request for
approval of a new collection. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor and
a person is not required to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before August 24, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2012-0401, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), or
by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Geanetta Heard, Fuels Compliance
Center, 6406J, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
202-565-2085; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. EPA
will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate.
The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for review and
approval. At that time, EPA will issue another Federal Register notice
to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to
submit additional comments to OMB.
    Abstract: In the final rule, EPA finalized the renewable fuels
standard (RFS) program regulations at 40 CFR part 80, subpart M. We
believe these provisions will facilitate the introduction of new
renewable fuels as well as improve implementation of the program. These
provisions includes various changes related to biogas including changes
to the revised compressed natural gas (CNG)/liquefied

natural gas (LNG) pathway and amendments to various associated
registration, recordkeeping, and reporting provisions. The final
regulation includes a lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions analysis for
renewable electricity, renewable diesel and naphtha produced from
landfill biogas. Adding these new pathways will enhance the ability of
the biofuels industry to supply advanced biofuels, including cellulosic
biofuels, which greatly reduce the greenhouse gas emissions (GHG)
compared to the petroleum-based fuels they replace. It also addresses
``nameplate capacity'' issues for certain production facilities that do
not claim exemption from the 20 percent GHG reduction threshold. In the
accompanying final rule for this ICR, EPA addressed issues related to
crop residue and corn kernel fiber and finalized an approach to
determining the volume of cellulosic Renewable Identification Numbers
(RIN's) produced from various cellulosic feedstocks. We also included a
lifecycle analysis of advanced butanol and discussed the potential to
allow for commingling of compliant products at the retail facility
level as long as the environmental performance of the fuels would not
be detrimental. Several other amendments to the RFS2 program were
included.
    In the final rule, EPA also amended various changes to the E15
(gasoline containing up to 15 volume percent ethanol) mis-fueling
mitigation regulations (MMR) at 40 CFR part 80, subpart N. Among the
E15 changes finalized were technical corrections and amendments to
sections dealing with labeling, E15 surveys, product transfer
documents, and prohibited acts. Technical amendments and corrections
for this regulations had no bearings on the industry estimates.
    Lastly, EPA finalized changes to the survey requirements associated
with the ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) program. This change is not
addressed here because there are fewer than nine respondents.
    Form Numbers: 2
RFS1700-RFS2 Renewable Fuel Producers--Cellulosic Converted Fraction--
5900-362
RFS1300-RFS2 Renewable Fuel Producers Using Crop Residue as a Feedstock
Report--5900-262
    Respondents/affected entities: Producers of renewable fuels,
Producers of renewable electricity, Importers of renewable fuels,
Feedstock producers from waste treatment plants, Feedstock producers
from landfills, Parties who own RINS's.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory.
    Estimated number of respondents: 60 (total).
    Frequency of response: Quarterly, annually, on occasion.
    Total estimated burden: 8,889 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $1,081,415 (per year), includes $0 annualized
capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in Estimates EPA estimates yearly 60 respondents and 8,889
burden hours which will cost industry $1,081,415. This is a new
collection with no industry cost for comparison.

    Dated: June 15, 2015.
Byron Bunker,
Director, Compliance Division, Office of Transportation and Air
Quality, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2015-15467 Filed 6-22-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51992-51993]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20765]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 405-111]

Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Notice of Application Accepted
for Filing, Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene and Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Non-project use of project lands and waters;
water withdrawal and discharge into licensed project waters.
    b. Project No.: 405-111.
    c. Date Filed: June 30, 2014.
    d. Applicant: Exelon Generation Company, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Conowingo Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The project is located on the Susquehanna River in
Cecil and Harford Counties, Maryland and in Lancaster and York
Counties, Pennsylvania.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contacts: Mr. Brian J. McManus, Van Ness Feldman, LLP,
1050 Thomas Jefferson Street NW., Seventh Floor, Washington, DC 20007-
3877, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, and email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. FERC Contact: CarLisa Linton-Peters, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>,
and email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and protests
is 30 days from the issuance date of this notice by the Commission.
    All documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commissions Web
site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. If unable to be
filed electronically documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an
original should be mailed to: Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. Please include the project number (P-405-
111) on any comments or motions filed.
    k. Description of Request: Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon
or licensee) proposes to permit Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (ODEC
or permitee) use of the Conowingo Project waters and lands for the
withdraw and discharge of water necessary to support the combined-cycle
electric power generating plant known as the Wildcat Point Generation
Project that ODEC proposes to build and operate in Cecil County,
Maryland. The proposed non-project use of project lands would include
the construction and installation of a water intake structure and
pipeline extending into the Conowingo reservoir, an off-site pumphouse
and pipeline, and an outfall structure and pipeline that would
discharge return water back into the reservoir. The amount of the
proposed water withdraw from the Conowingo Project reservoir would not
exceed 8.7 million gallons per day (mgd) and the return water would not
exceed 0.8 mgd, for a total consumptive use of 7.9 mgd. ODEC would use
water from the Conowingo reservoir for cooling and process water for
the new generating facilities. The proposed Wildcat Point Generation
Project would be located outside of the Conowingo Project boundary, in
Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits
in the docket number field to access the

document. You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
call 1-866-208-3676 or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call
(202) 502-8659. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item (h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: All filings must (1)
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS,'' ``PROTEST,'' or
``MOTION TO INTERVENE'' as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the
name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person commenting, protesting or intervening; and (4)
otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through
385.2005. All comments, motions to intervene, or protests must set
forth their evidentiary basis. Any filing made by an intervener must be
accompanied by proof of service on all persons listed in the service
list prepared by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with
18 CFR 385.2010.

    Dated: August 25, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-20765 Filed 8-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 143 (Thursday, July 27, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34857-34858]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15879]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2017-0707]

Safety Zone, Seafair Air Show Performance, 2017, Seattle, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the annual Seafair Air Show
Performance safety zone on Lake Washington, Seattle, WA daily, from 8
a.m. until 4 p.m., from August 3, 2017, through August 6, 2017. This
action is necessary to ensure the safety of the public from inherent
dangers associated with these annual aerial displays. During the
enforcement period, no person or vessel may enter or transit this
safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.1319 will be enforced daily, from
8 a.m. until 4 p.m., from August 3, 2017, through August 6, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice
of enforcement, call or email Petty Officer Zachary Spence, Sector
Puget Sound Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard; telephone (206)
217-6051, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the Seafair Air
Show Performance safety zone in 33 CFR 165.1319 daily, from 8 a.m.
until 4 p.m., from August 3, 2016, through August 6, 2017 unless
canceled sooner by the Captain of the Port.
    Under the provisions of 33 CFR 165.1319, the following area is
designated as a safety zone: All waters of Lake Washington, Washington
State, south of the Interstate 90 bridge, west of Mercer Island, and
north of Seward Park. The specific boundaries of the safety zone are
listed in 33 CFR 165.1319(b).
    In accordance with the general regulations in 33 CFR part 165,
subpart C, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the zone except
for support vessels and support personnel, vessels registered with the
event organizer, or other vessels authorized by the Captain of the Port
or Designated Representatives. Vessels and persons granted
authorization to enter the safety zone must obey all lawful orders or
directions made by the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
    The Captain of the Port may be assisted by other federal, state and
local law enforcement agencies in enforcing this regulation.
    This document is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.1319 and 5
U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this notice of enforcement in the Federal
Register, the Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with
advanced notification of the safety zone via the Local Notice to
Mariners and marine information broadcasts on the day of the event. If
the COTP determines that the safety zone need not be enforced for the
full duration stated in this notice of enforcement, he may use a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners to grant general permission to enter the
regulated area.

    Dated: July 17, 2017.
M.M. Balding,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting, Captain of the Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2017-15879 Filed 7-26-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Attached is a supplement to the citizen petition the Juice Products Association (JPA) filed on July 2, 2014 requesting that the FDA establish a minimum Brix level for single-strength (100 percent) coconut water that would be used to calculate the labeled percentage of juice from concentrate in a juice or juice beverage.  Also attached are four data files showing the Brix levels for coconut water obtained from Indonesia and the Philippines.


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 20, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66557-66558]
[FR Doc No: 2020-23175]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0049; FRL-10015-91]

Pesticide Product Registration; Receipt of Applications for New
Active Ingredients (September 2020)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has received applications to register pesticide products
containing active ingredients not included in any currently registered
pesticide products. Pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA is hereby providing notice of receipt and
opportunity to comment on these applications.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 19, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number and the File Symbol of interest as shown in the body of
this document, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/where-send-comments-epa-dockets.
    Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505P), main telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The mailing address for each contact person is:
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. As part of the mailing
address, include the contact person's name, division, and mail code.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

II. Registration Applications

    EPA has received applications to register pesticide products
containing active ingredients not included in any currently registered
pesticide products. Pursuant to the provisions of FIFRA section 3(c)(4)
(7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(4)), EPA is hereby providing notice of receipt and
opportunity to comment on these applications. Notice of receipt of
these applications does not imply a decision

by the Agency on these applications. For actions being evaluated under
EPA's public participation process for registration actions, there will
be an additional opportunity for public comment on the proposed
decisions. Please see EPA's public participation website for additional
information on this process (http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/public-participation-process-registration-actions).

New Active Ingredient

    EPA Registration Numbers: 62719-TLE, 62719-TLG, and 62610-TLU.
Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0449. Applicant: Dow AgroSciences
LLC, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN. Product names: Adavelt
Technical, GF-3840 Turf, and GF-3840 AG. Active ingredient: Fungicide--
florylpicoxamid at 95% (technical product) and 9.9% (end use products).
Proposed use: Barley (bran, grin, hay, straw); beans, dried shelled,
except soybean, subgroup 6C; beet, sugar (dried pulp, roots, tops);
rapeseed subgroup 20A (fodder/straw, seed); wheat (aspirated grain
fractions, bran, forage, grain, hay); and turf. Contact: RD.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: October 9, 2020.
Delores Barber,
Director, Information Technology and Resources Management Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2020-23175 Filed 10-19-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 14, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19576-19580]
[FR Doc No: 2021-07574]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 81

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2020-0037; FRL-10022-22-OAR]

Air Quality Designations for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)
Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard--Round 4--Supplemental
Amendment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is withdrawing the
initial nonattainment designation for portions of the Outagamie County,
Wisconsin, area for the 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2) primary
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and is finalizing a
designation of attainment/unclassifiable for the area. The EPA
Administrator signed an action on December 21, 2020, to designate
certain areas in the United States (U.S.) for the 2010 SO2
NAAQS, including the Outagamie County area. This action supplements the
EPA's December 2020 designations, published in the Federal Register of
March 26, 2021, which have not yet taken effect.

DATES: This final rule is effective on April 30, 2021.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action at https://regulations.gov under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2020-0037. Although
listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form.
    Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our
staff, the EPA Docket Center and Reading Room are currently closed to
the public, with limited exceptions, to reduce the risk of transmitting
COVID-19. The Docket Center staff will continue to provide remote
customer service via email, phone, and webform. For further information
on EPA Docket Center services and the current status, please visit us
online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions concerning this
action, please contact Andrew Leith, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality
Policy Division, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Code C539-04, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For questions regarding the specific area in this
action, please contact Alisa Liu, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Most EPA offices are closed to reduce the risk of transmitting
COVID-19, but staff remain available via telephone and email. The EPA
encourages the public to review information related to the Round 4 2010
SO2 NAAQS designations online at https://www.epa.gov/sulfur-dioxide-designations and also in the public docket at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2020-0037.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

    The following is an outline of the Preamble.

I. Preamble Glossary of Terms and Acronyms
II. What is the purpose of this supplemental action?
III. Designation Decision Based on 2018-2020 Data
IV. Effective Date of This Action
V. Comments Received Regarding EPA's Round 4 Designations
VI. Environmental Justice Concerns
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
    A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
    B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
    C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
    D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
    E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
    F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Government
    G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health and Safety Risks
    H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
    I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
    J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
    K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
    L. Judicial Review

I. Preamble Glossary of Terms and Acronyms

    The following are abbreviations of terms used in the preamble.

APA Administrative Procedure Act
AQS Air Quality System
CAA Clean Air Act
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DC District of Columbia
DRR Data Requirements Rule
E.O. Executive Order
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FR Federal Register
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NTTAA National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
OMB Office of Management and Budget
ppb Parts per billion
PRA Paperwork Reduction Act
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act
SO2 Sulfur Dioxide
TAR Tribal Authority Rule
UMRA Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995
U.S. United States

II. What is the purpose of this supplemental action?

    The EPA was under a December 31, 2020, court-ordered deadline to
designate all remaining areas for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS
(``Round 4''). On December 21, 2020, the EPA Administrator signed a
final action to designate 44 areas in accordance with section 107(d) of
the Clean Air Act (CAA).\1\ Nine areas were designated as

nonattainment; two areas were designated as unclassifiable; and 33
areas were designated as attainment/unclassifiable. The list of newly
designated areas in each state, the boundaries of each area, and the
designation of each area, appear in the tables at the end of that
action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Round 4 2010 SO2 NAAQS designations action
was signed by the EPA Administrator, Andrew Wheeler, on December 21,
2020, pursuant to a court-ordered deadline of December 31, 2020.
That document with the original signature and date is maintained by
the EPA. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, Acting
Administrator Jane Nishida re-signed the same action on March 10,
2021, for publication (86 FR 16055, March 26, 2021). The
administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of the
action upon publication in the Federal Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of this supplemental action is to withdraw the
SO2 designation for one area that the EPA designated as
nonattainment in the December 2020 action and designate that area as
attainment/unclassifiable. The EPA indicated in that action that if any
state submitted complete, quality-assured, certified 2020 data to the
appropriate EPA Regional office supporting a change of the designation
status for any Round 4 area within that state, and the EPA agreed that
a change of designation status was appropriate, the EPA would withdraw
the December 21, 2020, designation for the area and issue another
designation that reflects the analysis of such information.
    The EPA received such 2020 air quality information from the state
of Wisconsin on January 13, 2021, and this information is available in
the docket for this action. Based on our evaluation of the 2020
monitoring data, in this supplemental action the EPA is changing its
December 21, 2020, nonattainment designation for portions of Outagamie
County, Wisconsin to attainment/unclassifiable. The portions of
Outagamie County affected by this change cover Outagamie County except
Oneida Township (which includes Oneida Reservation), Oneida Off-
Reservation Trust Land, and noncontiguous portions of Seymour Township
adjoining Oneida Nation Tribal Lands.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ In the December 2020 action, the EPA designated Oneida
Township (which includes the Oneida Reservation), Oneida Off-
Reservation Trust Land, and the noncontiguous portions of Seymour
Township adjoining Oneida Nation Tribal Lands as attainment/
unclassifiable. See the EPA's intended designations technical
support document for Wisconsin at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-08/documents/11-wi-rd4_intended_so2_designations_tsd.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The December 21, 2020, action was based on application of the EPA's
nationwide analytical approach and technical analysis, including
evaluation of monitoring data and air quality modeling, to determine
the appropriate designation and area boundary based on the weight of
evidence for each area, which are hereby incorporated by reference into
this supplement of that action. Modification to the December 21, 2020,
designation for this area does not represent a ``redesignation''
because this change is a withdrawal of that initial designation prior
to its effective date and is an issuance of a new initial designation.
The EPA is making this change to reflect the most recent 3 years of
complete, quality-assured, and certified data (i.e., 2018-2020) that
have become available prior to the April 30, 2021, effective date of
the December 21, 2020, action.

III. Designation Decision Based on 2018-2020 Data

    In a May 1, 2020, letter, which the state later modified on July
17, 2020, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR)
recommended that the EPA designate Outagamie County, Wisconsin as
nonattainment for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. On August 13, 2020,
consistent with section 107(d)(1)(b)(ii) of the CAA, the EPA notified
Wisconsin that it intended to designate portions of Outagamie County,
Wisconsin as nonattainment based on the most recent 3 years (2017-
2019), at that time, of complete, quality-assured, certified data from
a monitor (Air Quality System (AQS) Site ID #55-087-0015) indicating a
violation of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS with a design value of 77
parts per billion (ppb).\3\ The EPA explained in its December 2020
Responses to Comments on the intended designations (see pp. 26-27) that
if the Kaukauna SO2 monitor produced a valid attaining
design value for the 2018-2020 period, and Wisconsin submitted the
certified data to the EPA prior to February 15, 2021, then the EPA
would withdraw the nonattainment designation announced in the December
2020 action and change the initial designation of the Outagamie County
area to attainment/unclassifiable.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS is 75 ppb, based on the
3-year average of the 99th percentile of the annual distribution of
daily maximum 1-hour average concentrations. See 40 CFR 50.17.
    \4\ Response to Comments on EPA's Intended Designations for the
2010 Sulfur Dioxide Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS)--Round 4, December 2020. Available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-12/documents/rd4_so2_designations_responses_to_comments_final_v2.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 13, 2021, the WDNR submitted complete, quality-assured,
and certified SO2 air quality monitoring data from the
Kaukauna monitor for calendar year 2020 to the EPA.\5\ Additionally,
WDNR requested that the EPA use the most recently available data to
change the designation of Outagamie County, Wisconsin from
nonattainment to attainment/unclassifiable prior to the April 30, 2021
effective date of the December 2020 action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The docket for this action includes WDNR's AMP600 and
AMP450NC Data Certification Reports dated January 7, 2021, and
Letter dated January 13, 2021, and the EPA's Concurrence dated
January 19, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Kaukauna monitor is located 1.53 kilometers north northeast of
the Ahlstrom-Munksj[ouml] NA Specialty Solutions, LLC--Kaukauna
facility. The monitor was sited to characterize the maximum 1-hour
SO2 concentration in the area surrounding the facility.
Based on the ambient monitoring data certified by WDNR in the EPA's
AQS, the annual 99th percentiles for the daily maximum 1-hour
SO2 concentrations are 107.8 ppb for 2018, 32.3 ppb 2019,
and 66.7 ppb for 2020. Data collected at this monitor show a valid,
attaining 1-hour SO2 design value of 69 ppb based on
complete, certified 2018-2020 data. The design value was calculated
according to the data handling procedures in 40 CFR part 50, Appendix
T, and is valid for comparison to the NAAQS.
    Based on complete, quality-assured and certified air quality
monitoring data from 2020 submitted by WDNR, showing attainment of the
1-hour SO2 primary NAAQS in the area, the EPA is changing
the initial designation for this area. As noted in Section II of this
notice, the EPA provided a process in the December 2020 action for
considering 2020 air quality data if such data supported a change to
the initial designation for an area. Pursuant to this process, the EPA
is withdrawing the initial nonattainment designation for portions of
Outagamie County, Wisconsin, and the EPA is changing the initial
designation of these portions of Outagamie County to attainment/
unclassifiable, thereby designating the entirety of Outagamie County as
attainment/unclassifiable. Procedurally, this change in the initial
designation is consistent with the EPA's early data certification and
evaluation process, as described previously in this document and in the
December 2020 action. The table at the end of this document (amendment
to 40 CFR 81.350) lists the only area for which the EPA is changing the
initial designation.

IV. Effective Date of This Action

    The effective date of designation of the area addressed in this
action is April 30, 2021, the same effective date as the December 21,
2020, final designations action. The EPA is making these changes
without notice and comment in accordance with section 107(d)(2) of the
CAA, which exempts the promulgation of these designations from the
notice and comment provisions of the

Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Section 553(d) of the APA generally
provides that rulemakings shall not be effective less than 30 days
after publication except where the agency finds good cause for an
earlier date. 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1) and (3). Were the EPA not to expedite
the effective date of this action, and instead make the effective date
30 days after publication, there would be confusion regarding the
appropriate designation for the affected area in Wisconsin, and the
state and the EPA would likely have to expend unnecessary time and
resources at a later time to resolve that confusion. The effective date
for this action is, therefore, justified because the EPA finds that
there is good cause to make the rule effective April 30, 2021, because
it is in the public interest to avoid the potential delay and waste of
resources associated with allowing the designations in the December 21,
2020, action to go into effect for this area, and the rule does not
contain new requirements for which affected entities need time to
prepare.

V. Comments Received Regarding the EPA's Round 4 Designations

    During the 120-day notification period for the fourth round of
designations, WDNR submitted comments, observing that SO2
concentrations at the Kaukauna monitor have decreased since 2018. WDNR
predicted that the 2018-2020 design value would be below the 2010
SO2 NAAQS based on more recent data through September 2020
and suggested that this would potentially make finalization of a
nonattainment designation unnecessary. If final quality assured data
from the Kaukauna monitor at the end of 2020 showed a 2018-2020 design
value that meets the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS, WDNR stated that
it intended to early certify the 2020 data and request that the EPA
change the initial designation for Outagamie County. The EPA did not
receive any other comments regarding the Outagamie County, Wisconsin
area during the 30-day public comment period.

VI. Environmental Justice Concerns

    When the EPA establishes a new or revised NAAQS, the CAA requires
the EPA to designate all areas of the U.S. as either nonattainment,
attainment, or unclassifiable. Area designations address environmental
justice concerns by ensuring that the public is properly informed about
the air quality in an area. In locations where air quality does not
meet the NAAQS, the CAA requires relevant state authorities to initiate
appropriate air quality management actions to ensure that all those
residing, working, attending school, or otherwise present in those
areas are protected, regardless of minority and economic status.

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is exempt from review by the Office of Management and
Budget because it responds to the CAA requirement to promulgate air
quality designations after promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA. This action fulfills the non-discretionary duty for the EPA to
promulgate air quality designations after promulgation of a new or
revised NAAQS and does not contain any information collection
activities.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    This designation action under CAA section 107(d) is not subject to
the RFA. The RFA applies only to rules subject to notice-and-comment
rulemaking requirements under the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other
statute. Section 107(d)(2)(B) of the CAA explicitly provides that
designations are exempt from the notice-and-comment provisions of the
APA. In addition, designations under CAA section 107(d) are not among
the list of actions that are subject to the notice-and-comment
rulemaking requirements of CAA section 307(d).

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538 and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local, or tribal governments, or the private sector.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the state, on the relationship between
the national government and the state, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. The
division of responsibility between the federal government and the state
for purposes of implementing the NAAQS is established under the CAA.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Government

    This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This action concerns the designation of certain
areas in the U.S. for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. The CAA provides
for states, territories, and eligible tribes to develop plans to
regulate emissions of air pollutants within their areas, as necessary,
based on the designations. The Tribal Authority Rule (TAR) provides
tribes the opportunity to apply for eligibility to develop and
implement CAA programs, such as programs to attain and maintain the
SO2 NAAQS, but it leaves to the discretion of the tribe the
decision of whether to apply to develop these programs and which
programs, or appropriate elements of a program, the tribe will seek to
adopt. This rule does not have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes. It would not create any additional requirements
beyond those of the SO2 NAAQS. This rule establishes the
designations for certain areas of the country for the 2010
SO2 NAAQS, but no areas of Indian country are being
designated as nonattainment by this action. Furthermore, this rule does
not affect the relationship or distribution of power and
responsibilities between the federal government and Indian tribes. The
CAA and the TAR establish the relationship of the federal government
and tribes in developing plans to attain the NAAQS, and this rule does
nothing to modify that relationship. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does
not apply.
    Although Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule, after
the EPA promulgated the 2010 primary SO2 NAAQS, the EPA
communicated with tribal leaders and environmental staff regarding the
designations process. In 2011, the EPA also sent individualized letters
to all federally recognized tribes to explain the designation process
for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS, to provide the EPA designations
guidance, and to offer consultation with the EPA. The EPA provided
further information to tribes through presentations at the National
Tribal Forum and through participation in National Tribal Air
Association conference calls. The EPA also sent individualized letters
to all federally recognized tribes that submitted recommendations to
the EPA about the EPA's intended Round 1 designations for the
SO2 standard and offered tribal leaders the opportunity for

consultation.\6\ These communications provided opportunities for tribes
to voice concerns to the EPA about the general designations process for
the 2010 SO2 NAAQS, as well as concerns specific to a tribe,
and informed the EPA about key tribal concerns regarding designations
as the designations process was under development and through its
implementation up to that point. For the second, third, and fourth
rounds of SO2 designations, the EPA sent additional letters
to tribes that could potentially be affected and offered additional
opportunities for participation in the designations process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ These communication letters to the tribes are provided in
the dockets for Round 1 (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0233), Round
2 (Docket ID NO. EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0464), and Round 3 (Docket ID NO.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not establish an environmental
standard intended to mitigate health or safety risks.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    This action does not have disproportionately high and adverse human
health or environmental effects on minority populations, low-income
populations and/or indigenous peoples, as specified in Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The documentation for this
determination is contained in Section VI of this action,
``Environmental Justice Concerns.''

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the U.S. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

L. Judicial Review

    Section 307(b)(1) of the CAA indicates which Federal Courts of
Appeal have venue for petitions of review of final actions by the EPA.
This section provides, in part, that petitions for review must be filed
in the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit: (i) When
the agency action consists of ``nationally applicable regulations
promulgated, or final actions taken, by the Administrator,'' or (ii)
when such action is locally or regionally applicable, if ``such action
is based on a determination of nationwide scope or effect and if in
taking such action the Administrator finds and publishes that such
action is based on such a determination.'' For locally or regionally
applicable final actions, the CAA reserves to the EPA complete
discretion whether to invoke the exception in (ii).
    To the extent a court finds this action locally or regionally
applicable, the Administrator is exercising the complete discretion
afforded to him under the CAA to make and publish a finding that this
action is based on a determination of ``nationwide scope or effect''
within the meaning of CAA section 307(b)(1).\7\ As explained in this
document, this final action withdrawing the designation and
promulgating a new initial designation of one area for the 2010
SO2 primary NAAQS supplements the nationally applicable
December 2020 final action taken by the EPA to issue a fourth round of
designations for areas across the U.S., located in 21 states, nine EPA
regions, and 10 federal judicial circuits, for the 2010 SO2
primary NAAQS.\8\ The December 21, 2020, signed action and this
supplemental action, replacing the initial designation of one area in
the December 21, 2020, signed action prior to the effective date of
that action, are promulgated pursuant to a common, nationwide
analytical method and interpretation of CAA section 107(d). In other
words, this supplemental action applies the same uniform, nationwide
analytical method and interpretation of CAA section 107(d) applied
across the country in the December 2020 final action, including the
EPA's nationwide analytical approach to and technical analysis of
evaluating monitoring data and air quality modeling within the EPA's
interpretation of statutory terms in the CAA such as the definitions of
nonattainment, attainment, and unclassifiable under section 107(d)(1)
of the CAA. Both the supplemental action and the December 21, 2020,
action are based on this same common core of determinations regarding
the nationwide analytical method and interpretation of CAA section
107(d), and the Administrator previously made and published a finding
in the December 2020 final action that such action is based on a
determination of ``nationwide scope or effect'' within the meaning of
CAA section 307(b)(1).\9\ More specifically, this final action is based
on a determination by the EPA to evaluate areas nationwide under a
common five factor analysis in determining whether areas are in
violation of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS, as follows: 1. Air quality
characterization via ambient monitoring and/or dispersion modeling
results; 2. emissions-related data; 3. meteorology; 4. geography and
topography; and 5. jurisdictional boundaries.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ In deciding whether to invoke the exception by making and
publishing a finding that this final action is based on a
determination of nationwide scope or effect, the Administrator has
also taken into account a number of policy considerations, including
his judgment balancing the benefit of obtaining the D.C. Circuit's
authoritative centralized review versus allowing development of the
issue in other contexts and the best use of agency resources.
    \8\ The rulemaking docket, EPA-HQ-OAR-2020-0037, is the same
docket for both the December 21, 2020, signed action and for this
supplemental action, with the relevant difference being that in
addition to the materials it contained regarding this Wisconsin area
generated through December 21, 2020--the date that action was signed
by the Administrator--it now also contains the supplemental
information submitted by Wisconsin related to this area.
    \9\ In the report on the 1977 Amendments that revised section
307(b)(1) of the CAA, Congress noted that the Administrator's
determination that the ``nationwide scope or effect'' exception
applies would be appropriate for any action that has a scope or
effect beyond a single judicial circuit. See H.R. Rep. No. 95-294 at
323, 324, reprinted in 1977 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1402-03.
    \10\ See ``Area Designations for the 2010 Primary Sulfur Dioxide
National Ambient Air Quality Standard--Round 4,'' memorandum to
Regional Air Division Directors, Regions 1-10, from Peter
Tsirigotis, dated September 5, 2019, available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2019-09/documents/round_4_so2_designations_memo_09-05-2019_final.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For these reasons, the Administrator is exercising the complete
discretion afforded to him by the CAA and hereby finds that this final
action is based on a determination of nationwide scope or effect for
purposes of CAA section 307(b)(1) and is hereby publishing that finding
in the Federal Register.
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of

Columbia Circuit within 60 days from the date this final action is
published in the Federal Register. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final action does not
affect the finality of the action for the purposes of judicial review,
nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review
must be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.

Michael S. Regan,
Administrator.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR
part 81 as follows:

PART 81--DESIGNATIONS OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES

0
1. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

Subpart C--Section 107 Attainment Status Designations

0
2. In Sec.  81.350, the table titled ``Wisconsin--2010 Sulfur Dioxide
NAAQS [Primary]'' is amended by removing the entry for ``Outagamie
County (part)'', and removing the entry for ``Outagamie County
(remainder)'' and adding an entry for ``Outagamie County'' in its
place.
    The addition reads as follows:

Sec.  81.350   Wisconsin.

* * * * *

                                       Wisconsin-2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS
                                                    [Primary]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                           Designation
              Designated area \1\               ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Date \2\                           Type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                    * * * * *
Outagamie County...............................   4/30/2021  Attainment/Unclassifiable.

                                                   * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Includes any Indian country in each county or area, unless otherwise specified. EPA is not determining the
  boundaries of any Indian country in this table, including any area of Indian country located in the larger
  designation area. The inclusion of any Indian country in the designation area is not a determination that the
  state has regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act for such Indian country.
\2\ This date is April 9, 2018, unless otherwise noted.
\3\ Includes Indian country of the tribe listed in this table located in Forest County, Wisconsin. Information
  pertaining to areas of Indian country in this table is intended for Clean Air Act planning purposes only and
  is not an EPA determination of Indian country status or any Indian country boundary. EPA lacks the authority
  to establish Indian country land status, and is making no determination of Indian country boundaries, in this
  table.

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-07574 Filed 4-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P