[Federal Register: September 12, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 178)]
[Notices]
[Page 53064-53066]
[DOCID:fr12se08-111]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-58467; File No. SR-NYSE-2008-77]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Its Rule Governing Equity-Linked Debt Securities
To Permit the Listing of Equity-Linked Debt Securities Linked To
Baskets of Up to Thirty Underlying Securities and To Provide for
Greater Flexibility in Listing Criteria

September 5, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby
given that on August 26, 2008, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice and order to solicit comments on
the proposed rule change from interested persons and to approve the
proposal on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Section 703.21 of the Exchange's
Listed Company Manual (the ``Manual'') to permit the listing of Equity-
Linked Debt Securities (``ELDS'') related to up to thirty (30)
underlying stocks and to provide for greater flexibility in the listing
criteria for ELDS. The text of the proposed rule change is available at
NYSE, http://www.nyse.com, and the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item III below. The NYSE has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Section 703.21 of the Manual to
permit the listing of ELDS related to up to thirty (30) underlying
stocks and to provide for greater flexibility in the listing criteria
for ELDS. The Exchange wishes to make this change in order to harmonize
Section 703.21 with the comparable rules of the American Stock Exchange
(the ``Amex''),\3\ as well as the rules of NYSE Arca, Inc., which were
recently conformed to the Amex rules.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Amex's initial listing standards for Equity-Linked Notes are
set forth in Section 107A of the Amex Company Guide, which was
approved by the Commission in March 1990, and Section 107B of the
Amex Company Guide, which was approved by the Commission in May
1993. These sections have been amended several times. The filings
that are relevant to the topics discussed in this filing follow. See
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 27753 (March 1, 1990), 55 FR
8626 (March 8, 1990) (SR-Amex-89-29); 32343 (May 20, 1993), 58 FR
30833 (May 27, 1993) (SR-Amex-92-42); 34549 (August 18, 1994), 59 FR
43873 (August 25, 1994) (SR-Amex-93-46); 36990 (March 20, 1996), 61
FR 13545 (March 27, 1996) (SR-Amex-95-44); 37783 (October 4, 1996),
61 FR 53246 (October 10, 1996) (SR-Amex-96-31); 47055 (December 19,
2002), 67 FR 79669 (December 30, 2002) (SR-Amex-2002-110); 55733
(May 10, 2007), 72 FR 27602 (May 16, 2007) (SR-Amex-2007-34)
(collectively, ``Amex Releases'').
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56924 (December 7,
2007), 72 FR 70918 (December 13, 2007) (SR-NYSEArca-2007-98) (``NYSE
Arca Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Number of Linked Securities
    Currently, the Exchange defines ELDS as non-convertible debt of an
issuer where the value of the debt is based, at least in part, on the
value of another issuer's common stock, non-convertible preferred
stock, common units of a master limited partnership or any other common
equity security of a type classified for trading as stocks by the
Exchange. The Exchange proposes to amend the definition to state that
ELDS are defined as debt securities that are linked, in whole or in
part, to the value of up to thirty (30) underlying stocks. This change
conforms to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.1(b)(14), NYSE Arca Equities Rule
5.2(j)(2), and Section 107B of the Amex Company Guide.\5\ The Exchange
proposes to expand the number of stocks that may be linked to ELDS in
order to accommodate the varying types of ELDS products that are
currently offered in the marketplace. The Exchange believes that
expanding the number of stocks that may be linked to ELDS will also
provide investors with enhanced investment flexibility. The Exchange
also believes that there would be no investor protection concerns with
expanding the number of stocks linked to ELDS because each linked stock
is required to individually satisfy the applicable listing standards
set forth in Section 703.21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Amex Company Guide Section 107 and NYSE Arca Equities
Rules 5.1(b)(14) and 5.2(j)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Equity-Linked Debt Security Listing Standards
    Section 703.21(B) currently provides that an issue of ELDS must
have a minimum public distribution of one million ELDS, a minimum of
400 holders, a minimum market value of $4 million, and a minimum term
of one year.
    The Exchange proposes to add an exception to the minimum holders
standard in Section 703.21(B) to provide that, if the ELDS is traded in
$1,000 denominations, there will be no minimum number of holders. The
Exchange also proposes to add an exception to the public distribution
standard to provide that, if an issuance of ELDS is traded in $1,000
denominations, there will be no minimum public distribution
requirement. These changes correspond to NYSE Arca Equities Rule
5.2(j)(2)(B) and Section 107A(b) of the Amex Company Guide.\6\ The
Exchange notes that, without the exception to the one million ELDS
minimum public distribution requirement, the Exchange would be unable
to list ELDS in $1,000 dollar denominations having a market value of
less than $1 billion. The Exchange believes that the proposed exception
is a reasonable accommodation for those issuances in $1,000
denominations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Amex Company Guide Section 107 and NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 5.2(j)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange proposes to add an exception to the
holders requirement in Section 703.21(B) to provide that, if the ELDS
are redeemable at the option of the holders thereof on

at least a weekly basis, there will be no minimum number of holders.
This change also corresponds to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(2)(B)
and Section 107A(b) of the Amex Company Guide.\7\ The Exchange also
proposes to clarify that the holders requirement applies to ``public''
holders only.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Linked Equity Listing Standards
    Section 703.21(C) currently provides minimum standards applicable
to the stocks underlying an ELDS and the issuers of such stocks. The
rule currently provides that the ELDS must be issued by either: (a) A
U.S. company, or (b) a non-U.S. company that meets certain additional
standards. The Exchange proposes to amend the language in the rule to
indicate that an issue of ELDS may be linked to more than one security
and, therefore, more than one issuer of a security, in accordance with
the amended definition of ELDS as set forth above. In addition, the
Exchange proposes to amend the requirement that the issuer of any
security underlying an ELDS must be a U.S. company (in order not to
have to meet additional standards applicable to non-U.S. companies) to
require that the issuer be a Securities Exchange Act of 1934 reporting
company listed on a national securities exchange. This change
corresponds to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(2)(C) and Section 107B(e)
of the Amex Company Guide.\8\ The Exchange proposes this revision in
order to encompass non-U.S. companies that have reporting requirements
under the federal securities laws, which better addresses the
Exchange's concern regarding the public availability of financial
information for the issuers of the underlying securities. The Exchange
believes that such information serves to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Amex Company Guide Section 107(B)(e) and NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 5.2(j)(2)(C) and (D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In Sections 703.21(C) and (D), the Exchange also proposes certain
minor changes in order to clarify certain language, including the
language regarding common shares and American Depositary Shares
(``ADSs''), generally conforming it to NYSE Arca Equities Rule
5.2(j)(2)(C) and (D) and Section 107B(e) of the Amex Company Guide.\9\
In Section 703.21(D), the Exchange also proposes to add the standard
that, if any non-U.S. security and related securities have less than
20% of the worldwide trading volume occurring in the U.S. market during
the six-month period preceding the date of listing, then the ELDS may
not be linked to that non-U.S. security. This standard makes sense in
the context of the current rule \10\ and corresponds to NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 5.2(j)(2)(D) and Section 107B(f) of the Amex Company
Guide.\11\ The Exchange believes that this additional standard is
appropriate in that it limits the listing of ELDS linked to non-U.S.
securities to those that have a significant amount of U.S. market-
trading volume, which provides reasonable assurance that the underlying
non-U.S. securities are deliverable upon exercise of the ELDS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Id.
    \10\ The current rule provides that the issuance of ELDS
relating to underlying non-U.S. securities cannot exceed certain
percentage limits of the total outstanding shares of the underlying
security. These percentage limits are tied to 20%, 50% and 70% of
worldwide trading volume. Therefore, the rule as currently in
effect, does not contemplate less than 20% worldwide trading volume.
    \11\ See Amex Company Guide Section 107(B)(f) and NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 5.2(j)(2)(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to amend the last paragraph of the rule
to clarify that the Exchange, with the concurrence of the staff of the
Division of Trading and Markets of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, will evaluate the maximum percentage of ELDS that may be
issued on a case-by-case basis when an issuer proposes to list (rather
than ``issue,'' as the current rule states) ELDS that relate to more
than the allowable percentages of the underlying securities specified
in the rule. We also propose to delete a reference in the last
paragraph of the rule that indicates that this decision would relate to
the allowable percentage of ``the underlying security,'' as this
reference is no longer appropriate if ELDS may be issued that relate to
multiple underlying securities.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) \12\ of the Exchange Act, in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act,\13\ in
particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change is consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest in that, while the proposed amendment adds
additional flexibility to the rule, Section 703.21 as amended will
continue to contain significant provisions for the protection of
investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Exchange Act. Comments may be submitted
by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2008-77 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2008-77. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the

principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSE-2008-77 and should be submitted on or before
October 3, 2008.

IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
the Proposed Rule Change

    After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Exchange Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.\14\ In particular, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange
Act,\15\ which requires that the rules of an exchange be designed,
among other things, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ In approving this rule change, the Commission notes that it
has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds good cause for approving this proposal before
the 30th day after the publication of notice thereof in the Federal
Register. The proposal seeks to conform the Exchange's rules for ELDS
to the rules of Amex and NYSE Arca that have previously been approved
by the Commission.\16\ Therefore, the Commission does not believe that
the Exchange's proposal raises any novel regulatory issues. The
Commission believes that accelerating approval of this proposal should
benefit investors by creating, without undue delay, additional
competition in the market for ELDS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Amex Rule 107 and Amex Releases, note 3, supra. See
also NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.1(b)(14) and 5.2(j)(2) and NYSE Arca
Release, note 4, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Exchange Act,\17\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2008-77) be,
and it hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-21166 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


1 DRAFT Supporting Statement for Information Collection Request Cold Temperature Hydrocarbon Emissions Standards for Light Duty Vehicles, Light Duty Trucks, and Medium Duty Passenger Vehicles ( Proposed Rule)

EPA ICR 0783.50 February, 2006 Assessment and Standards Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality Office of Air and Radiation U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 PART A OF THE SUPPORTING STATEMENT 1. Identification of the Information Collection ( a) Title and Number of the Information Collection " Cold Temperature Hydrocarbon Emissions Standards for Light Duty Vehicles, Light Duty Trucks, and Medium Duty Passenger Vehicles ( Proposed Rule)" EPA ICR 0783.50, OMB Control No. 2060 0104; expiration date 11 30 2008.

( b) Short Characterization/ Abstract The Environmental Protection Agency is promulgating stringent new controls on gasoline, passenger vehicles, and gas cans to further reduce benzene and other mobile source air toxics. The action, titled " Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants from Mobile Sources," will significantly lower emissions of benzene and the other air toxics in three ways: ( 1) by lowering benzene content in gasoline, ( 2) by reducing exhaust hydrocarbon emissions from passenger vehicles operated at cold temperatures, and ( 3) by reducing emissions that evaporate from, and permeate through, portable gasoline containers. The three components of the action are covered by independent ICRs. Burdens regarding the fuel standards are covered in ICR 1591.20; burdens regarding the gasoline container standards are covered in ICR 2213.01. The present ICR covers the vehicle emission standards that appear in 40 CFR part 85 ( Control of Air Pollution from Mobile Sources) and part 86 ( Control of Emissions from New and In use Highway Vehicles and Engines).

Compliance with current exhaust hydrocarbon emission standards passenger vehicles is determined by testing vehicles at an ambient temperature of approximately 75 ° F. Recent research and analytical work suggest that current standards often do not result in robust control of hydrocarbon exhaust emissions when vehicles are operated at cold temperatures. Data indicate that emission control at lower temperatures can be substantially improved using the same technological approaches already in use to meet the stringent standards at 75 ° F. Therefore, passenger vehicles will be subject to new hydrocarbon emissions standards at 20 ° F. A credit program and other provisions will provide flexibility to manufacturers, especially during the phase in period for model years 2010 to 2015.

Burdens associated with the existing emissions program for passenger vehicles were updated in ICR 0783.47 ( May 2005). The present ICR addresses additional incremental burdens associated with submitting cold temperature hydrocarbon emissions data to the EPA for certification and compliance. EPA's processing of this information will be conducted by the Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Office of Air and Radiation.

Information collected under this ICR will consist of cold temperature hydrocarbon emissions data and calculations for the related averaging, banking, and trading ( ABT) credit program. Data submitted by manufacturers will be reviewed by EPA staff to verify that the necessary tests have been performed and the manufacturer's product line meets 3 emission standards. Information will be submitted in electronic format for inclusion in EPA's computer databases. Subject to confidentiality claims, this information will be made available to interested parties upon request. Emission test information will be available on the internet.

Approximately 35 passenger car and light truck manufacturers ( allowing for interand intra corporate relationships and including independent commercial importers and alternative fuels vehicle converters) will submit cold temperature hydrocarbon data each year to certify their products. The addition of the cold temperature hydrocarbon emissions program will impose a cost of about $ 80,900 annually on the regulated industries: $ 54,100 in ongoing labor costs and $ 26,800 in amortized start up capital costs. EPA estimates no ongoing operations and maintenance costs.

2. Need For and Use of the Collection ( a) Need/ Authority for the Collection Title II of the Clean Air Act ( 42 U. S. C. 7521 et seq.) requires EPA to issue certificates of conformity for motor vehicle designs that comply with applicable emission standards. A manufacturer must have a certificate before vehicles may be legally introduced into commerce. To ensure compliance with this statute, EPA reviews product information and manufacturer test results.

EPA's emission compliance program is statutorily mandated; the Agency does not have discretion to cease these functions. Under Section 206( a) of the Clean Air Act ( 42 U. S. C. 7525) "... The Administrator shall test ... any new motor vehicle ... submitted by a manufacturer ... If such vehicle ... conforms   the Administrator shall issue a certificate of conformity." EPA uses the information supplied by the manufacturer to verify that the proper test vehicles have been selected and that the necessary testing has been performed to ensure that each vehicle design complies with emission standards. This information is also used by various state and local governments in running their vehicle Inspection and Maintenance ( I/ M) programs.

The regulations dealing with light duty vehicle, light duty truck, and medium duty passenger vehicle emission control can be found in 40 CFR Parts 85 and 86. The regulations are not attached to this statement due to their length and technical nature.

( b) Practical Utility/ Users of the Data EPA will use the cold temperature hydrocarbon data submitted by manufacturers to determine compliance with the proposed cold temperature hydrocarbon emissions standards. Motor vehicle manufacturers currently submit an application for emission certification prior to production. The application describes the major aspects of the proposed product line, technical details of the emission control systems, and the results of tests to indicate compliance with existing emissions standards. The application and supporting test results are reviewed and, if appropriate, a certificate of conformity is 4 issued. The cold temperature hydrocarbon data will be added to applications for certification.

An application for certification is submitted for each of the manufacturer's test groups. A test group is a selection of the product line that will be certified to a single emission standard, has the same number and arrangement of cylinders, and falls within a limited range ( slightly less than one liter) of displacement. ( Test groups are defined in 40 CFR 86.1827.) For the cold temperature hydrocarbon program, each test group will be certified to a specific cold temperature hydrocarbon emission level. Then, sales of vehicles in each test group, along with each test group's emission level, will be used to determine a fleet wide sales weighted average cold temperature hydrocarbon emission level. This fleet average emission level will be used to determined compliance with the standard. A credit banking and trading program will allow manufacturers whose fleet average falls below the standard to bank credits for future use or sale to other manufacturers. Manufacturers whose fleet average falls above the standard can use banked or purchased credits to meet the standard.

When a new model year vehicle is sufficiently similar to the previous year's model that the test group descriptions do not need to be changed, a certification application can be " carried over" from the previous application. The burden of preparing the application in such cases will be less because previous test results can be used, and the vehicle will be less likely to be selected for confirmatory testing. If the model has changed such that its test group designations change, then new supporting application information will be required. Similarly, when manufacturers make minor changes that affect the test group for an already certified engine model, a " running change" for that change must be submitted and a new certificate issued if the effect on emissions is substantial. The paperwork burden for such running changes is usually quite small.

3. Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria ( a) Nonduplication Efforts have been made to eliminate duplication in this information collection. The cold temperature hydrocarbon emissions compliance program will be highly integrated with existing emissions programs. Data from all programs and for various standards will be submitted collectively and electronically during the certification process.

Because of the specialized nature of the data submitted by manufacturers and the fact that product plans and emission performance information must be submitted to EPA prior to the start of production, this information is not available from any source other than the manufacturer.

( b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB The proposed information collection represented by this ICR is included in the notice of proposed rulemaking, " Cold Temperature Hydrocarbon Emissions Standards for Light Duty 5 Vehicles, Light Duty Trucks, and Medium Duty Passenger Vehicles ( Proposed Rule)," 40 CFR Parts 59, 80, 85 and 86, Docket Number EPA HQ OAR 2005 0036; RIN 2060 AK70. A copy of the proposed rule is available in this docket and will be submitted for publication in the Federal Register.

( c) Consultations The proposed regulations, including the cost analysis that is reflected in this ICR, were developed in close consultation with the affected industry. In early May 2005, EPA met with the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers to begin formal discussions. Since then, there have been multiple discussions with the Alliance, as well as individual manufacturers including Ford, GM, DaimlerChrysler, Honda, Toyota, Mercedes, Mitsubishi, and Nissan.

The individuals consulted have experience with various aspects of EPA's current programs, and were able to lend their opinions regarding the additional reporting burdens associated with a new cold temperature hydrocarbon standard. Their collective input has been reflected in the burden estimates discussed below.

( d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection As required by the Clean Air Act ( 42 USC 7525( a)), emission information is submitted on a yearly basis coinciding with the manufacturer's " model year." EPA allows applicants to define their own " model year," thus granting some flexibility in this regard. Major product changes typically occur at the start of a model year. Because of these statutory guidelines and evolving product lines, a collection frequency longer than a model year is not possible. However, when a vehicle design is " carried over" to a subsequent model year, the amount of new information required is substantially reduced.

( e) General Guidelines Manufacturers are required to keep some records for periods longer than three years. This requirement stems from the statutory requirement that manufacturers warrant some items for periods longer than 3 years. Manufacturers must also recall vehicle classes failing to meet emission standards during their useful life, typically 5 to 11 years depending on vehicle type. In order to satisfy these obligations, manufacturers must retain product information, with particular emphasis on the emission control systems. This information is vital in assuring that repairs and replacement parts properly function during the life of the warranty and that emissions limitations are met during the full useful lives. EPA believes that this recordkeeping requirement does not impose an unreasonable burden given the warranty and recall obligations. In fact, manufacturers would probably retain this information to support their normal business of supplying replacement parts.

This information collection activity complies with the remaining guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5. The proposal makes no changes in the reporting and recordkeeping provisions that impact any of the guidelines for information collections as approved in the 6 existing approved collection.

( f) Confidentiality Information submitted by manufacturers is held as confidential until the specific vehicle to which it pertains is available for purchase. After vehicles are available, most information associated with the manufacturer/ importer's application is available to the public. Under section 208 of the Clean Air Act ( 42 USC 7542( c)), all information, other than trade secret processes or methods, must be publicly available. Proprietary information is granted confidentiality in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, EPA regulations at 40 CFR Part 2, and class determinations issued by EPA's Office of General Counsel.

( g) Sensitive Questions No sensitive questions are asked in this information collection. This collection complies with the Privacy Act and OMB Circular A 108.

4. The Respondents and the Information Requested ( a) Respondents/ NAICS Codes The respondents are involved in the industries shown in the following table:

Category NAICS Code A Examples of Potentially Regulated Entities Industry 33611 336112 Motor vehicle manufacturers Industry 811112 811198 Commercial importers of vehicles and vehicle components.

A North American Industry Classification System ( NAICS)

( b) Information Requested ( i) Data items The information and reporting burden associated with this rule occurs within the context of EPA's motor vehicle certification program. Manufacturers must submit an application for emission certification prior to production. The application describes the major aspects of the proposed product line, technical details of the emission control systems, and the test results to indicate compliance with the emissions limitations. EPA reviews the application and supporting test results and, if appropriate, issues a certificate of conformity.

Current regulations already require manufacturers to collect hydrocarbon emissions data at cold ambient temperatures ( 40 CFR Subpart C, sections 86.244 and 86.144). These 7 data are collected as part of a standard for carbon monoxide ( CO) emissions at cold ambient temperatures of approximately 20 ° F. With the implementation of the new cold temperature hydrocarbon standard, manufacturers will now be required to process and report the hydrocarbon data that they are already collecting and include the data on applications for certification ( 40 CFR 86.1811 and 86.1864). Along with the hydrocarbon emissions data, manufacturers will also submit information on their salesweighted fleet average cold temperature NMHC emission levels and related credit calculations.

( ii) Respondent Activities Under the new standard, manufacturers will report cold temperature hydrocarbon emissions data which they currently generate from testing procedures required by regulation. Manufacturer testing, data collection and storage, and reporting mechanisms are largely in place to accommodate the requirements of the new cold temperature hydrocarbon emissions standard and will require only minimal modifications. The manufacturers will add the cold NMHC data to the application for certification process accounted for in ICR 0783.47. Though the overall emission compliance program is, of necessity, quite complex given the diversity of products available, the additional information collection activities related to the proposed standard are relatively minor.

5. The Information Collected  Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management ( a) Agency Activities EPA will review the cold temperature hydrocarbon data electronically submitted by a manufacturer as part of the manufacturer's application for certification. A significant portion of EPA's emission compliance activity is spent reviewing applications to verify that the correct vehicle tests have been conducted, that the necessary information has been submitted, and that the emissions levels comply with appropriate standards. Additionally, running change submissions must also be reviewed for possible emissions impacts and manufacturers' evaluations thereof. EPA will also monitor the credit banking and trading program. The cold temperature hydrocarbon emissions data will be added to various EPA publications, such as the Green Vehicle Guide and annual emissions reports.

( b) Collection Methodology and Management EPA currently makes extensive use of computers in collecting information from vehicle manufacturers. Essentially all routine information ( test results and vehicle descriptions) is electronically transmitted directly from the manufacturers through the CFEIS system and the VERIFY system under development. Remaining information, including diagrams and narrative descriptions, is submitted on optical disc. The proposed rule would require only minor changes to this reporting system currently used by manufacturers. 8 All information received by EPA is subject to review. Data submitted electronically is automatically screened; test results that are close to emission standards are reviewed in more detail. Narrative descriptions of the proposed product line are checked to verify that the appropriate vehicles have been tested. ( The emission program relies on a combination of " worst case" and representative data to accomplish its goals.) Except for projected sales and a very limited amount of proprietary product information ( typically catalyst formulations), all information is available to the public as soon as the vehicle is offered for sale. Emission data are available on the internet; other information is available upon request under the Freedom of Information Act.

( c) Small Entity Flexibility EPA has special procedures in place for small volume LDV/ LDT manufacturer certifications; i. e., those whose total sales are less than 15,000 units per year. These special procedures allow the small volume manufacturer to submit a simplified application for certification with respect to durability demonstrations. Further, by the very nature of their size, small volume manufacturers typically have very limited product lines. This characteristic both reduces the amount of information which must be submitted and also simplifies the process of selecting the correct test vehicle( s). Another provision for small manufacturers is the reduced certification fees available for manufacturers and importers of vehicles, who may pay one percent of the expected retail sales value of the vehicles if that is less than the normal fee. These flexibilities are already in place and will not change under the proposed standard.

( d) Collection Schedule The cold temperature NMHC standards will apply to 2010 and later model year passenger vehicles and trucks under 6,000 lbs gross vehicle weight rating ( GVWR), and 2012 and later model year trucks between 6,000 and 8,500 lbs GVWR and medium duty passenger vehicles between 8,500 and 10,000 lbs GVWR. As shown in Table 5.1, the lighter vehicles will follow a phase in schedule that will result in 100 percent compliance for model years 2013 and beyond. The heavier vehicles will follow a phase in schedule that will result in 100 percent compliance for model years 2015 and beyond. During the three model years before full compliance, manufacturers must ensure 25, 50, and 75 percent compliance, respectively.

Table 5.1   Standard and Phase in Schedule Phase In: Percentage of Vehicles by Model Year Vehicle Category Fleet Average NMHC Emissions ( grams/ mile) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 LDVs & LLDTs (  6,000 lbs GVWR) 0.3 25% 50% 75% 100%

HLDTs (> 6,000   8,500 lbs GVWR) &

MDPVs (> 8,500   10,000 lbs GVWR) 0.5 25% 50% 75% 100%

To earn credits or phase in flexibilities, manufacturers will have the option of certifying lighter vehicles to the cold temperature hydrocarbon standards as early as the 9 2008 model year and heavier vehicles as early as the 2010 model year. Therefore, there will be no reporting burdens in 2006 or 2007. Early submissions ( i. e., those that manufacturers voluntarily submit before 2010 for light vehicles and 2012 for heavy vehicles) must comply with all reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Information must be submitted for each " model year" that a manufacturer intends to build ( or import) vehicles. A " model year" is usually about one calendar year long; it typically begins prior to January 1st of the calendar year. If a product is unchanged between model years, much of the information can be " carried over." The collection frequency and burden are determined to a large extent by the manufacturer's marketing and product plans. However, as required by law, some submission is required for each model year's production.

6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection ( a) Estimating Respondent Burden Respondent burden estimates reflect full implementation of the program for both heavy and light vehicles in model year 2015. Burdens hours for the average individual respondent are shown in Table 6.1 below. EPA conducted informal consultations with fewer than nine respondents from the regulated community to obtain burden hour estimates. The burden to each respondent is estimated to be minimal for several reasons. First, we assumed that there will be no new testing burden since the respondents will collect the necessary data in the context of the existing cold CO emissions program. Testing burdens associated with cold CO standards were carefully analyzed in ICR 0783.47. Second, the burden hours do not include one time labor, such as time spent by respondents initially familiarizing themselves with reporting requirements or upgrading software. Such labor costs are treated as one time capital/ start up costs and are amortized over ten years. Finally, the ongoing labor hours account for only the time spent processing the cold NMHC data portion on applications for certification and ABT related burdens. Burdens associated with submission and recordkeeping of other data on applications have already been accounted for in ICR 0783.47.

( b) Estimating Respondent Costs ( i) Estimating labor costs Labor costs for an individual respondent are shown in Table 6.1 below. The hourly labor rates used to determine labor costs are national average hourly rates from November 2004 Bureau of Labor Statistics survey data for an Engineering Manager SOC 11 9041 ($ 50.10), a Mechanical Engineer SOC 17 2141 ($ 33.41), and Office/ Admin. Support SOC 43 9199 ($ 13.23). The rates shown here for management, technical, and clerical, respectively, do not include overhead. An overhead multiplier of 100 percent was added for the purpose of calculating labor costs. With the multiplier added, the rates are $ 100.20, $ 66.82, and $ 26.46, respectively.

The labor costs in this section reflect the ongoing costs associated with processing raw 10 data from emissions tests and incorporating that data on applications for certification. Processing data means converting the raw data to the appropriate reported emission levels to reflect new car emissions and " full useful life" emissions at 120,000 miles of use. Labor costs also include time spent gathering and submitting ABT credit program information, such as numbers of vehicles sold, emission levels, and credit calculations. One time labor costs, such as for time respondents spend initially familiarizing themselves with reporting requirements, are not included here. Instead, these costs are considered capital/ start up costs, and are amortized and reported in this ICR as annual capital costs.

Table 6.1   Annual Burden Hours and Labor Costs for Average Individual Respondent ( model year 2015 and beyond)

Burden Hours per Activity Activity Avg. No. Activities per Year Mgmt. Technical Clerical Total Burden Hours per Year Cost Per Activity Total Labor Cost per Year Process data and include on applications for certification 6.3 0.5 1.0 0.1 10.1 $ 119 $ 750 Collect and submit ABT information 1.0 1.0 10.0 1.0 12.0 $ 790 $ 790 TOTAL 7.3 1.5 11.0 1.1 22.1 $ 1,540 ( ii) Estimating Capital and Operations and Maintenance Costs EPA estimates no additional capital or O& M costs associated with the reporting and recordkeeping requirements of the cold NMHC data for certification and compliance purposes. Vehicle emissions testing laboratory equipment, computers, data collection and processing, and reporting and recordkeeping frameworks are already in place as part of the existing cold CO emissions program. The only ongoing costs are expected to come from the additional labor hours spent processing cold NMHC data for applications and ABTrelated burdens, which are accounted for as labor costs in section 6( b)( i).

( iii) Capital/ Start up Operating and Maintenance Costs Capital/ start up and O& M costs for an individual respondent are shown in Table 6.2 below. The costs in this section represent amortized initial one time costs associated with processing cold NMHC data. These startup burdens are primarily information technology and paperwork costs involving familiarization with the new data reporting requirements and reformatting management information systems to carry out and report the necessary data and calculations. All these burdens are add ons to well established reporting mechanisms for compliance and ABT programs.

Table 6.2   Annual Capital/ Start up Costs for Average Individual Respondent ( model year 2015 and beyond)

Activity Avg. Number of Activities per Year Total Cost per Year Familiarize with reporting requirements One time amortized cost $ 330 Upgrade data collection software One time amortized cost $ 440 TOTAL $ 770 11 ( c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost Agency burden estimates reflect full implementation of the program for both heavy and light vehicles in model year 2015. Labor rates and associated costs are based on Office of Personnel Management Table 2003 RUS for management grade GS 15 ($ 50.10), staff grade GS 13 ($ 33.41), and clerical grade GS 7 ($ 13.23). An overhead of 60 percent was added, resulting in the following labor rates: management $ 81.36; staff $ 58.53; and clerical $ 27.74.

EPA estimates the Agency will spend about 430 labor hours at a total annual cost for ongoing labor of $ 25,300 per year. A significant portion of EPA's emission compliance activity is spent reviewing applications to verify that the correct vehicle tests have been conducted, that the necessary information has been submitted, and that the emissions levels comply with appropriate standards. These costs also include answering respondent questions, monitoring the ABT program, and adding cold temperature hydrocarbon emissions data to various EPA publications, such as the Green Vehicle Guide and annual emissions reports.

EPA estimates no new ongoing capital or O& M costs associated with the information collection. Computers, data collection and processing, and reporting and recordkeeping frameworks are already in place as part of the existing cold CO emissions program.

EPA estimates minimal initial one time capital/ start up costs. These costs will result from time spent familiarizing staff with the new regulations and costs related to software upgrades. We are estimating start up costs of $ 1,600 per year when amortized over ten years.

( d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs Upon full implementation of the cold temperature NMHC program in 2015, EPA estimates that each year approximately 35 respondents will submit a combined total of approximately 220 certification applications for compliance with cold NMHC data reporting requirements. Due to the diverse nature of the motor vehicle industry, there is no typical or average respondent. However, the overall burden to the respondent universe will be quite minimal since the reporting and recordkeeping infrastructure is already in place.

( e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables ( i) Respondent Tally Total Annual Burden Hours 770 Total Annual Labor Cost $ 54,100 Total Annual O& M Cost 0 Total Annual Capital Cost $ 26,800 ( ii) The Agency Tally 12 Total Annual Burden Hours 430 Total Annual Labor Cost $ 25,300 Total Annual O& M Cost 0 Total Annual Capital Cost $ 1,600 ( iii) Variations in the Annual Bottom Line The costs shown reflect burdens upon full implementation of the standards in 2015, after which EPA does not anticipate any significant annual variations in the bottom line.

( f) Reasons for Change in Burden The burden reported in this ICR is attributed to a new regulation. Since the proposed rule makes no changes to the type of information collection which manufacturers currently undertake, the only burdens are a result of submitting the data to EPA.

( g) Burden Statement The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 22.1 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number EPA HQ OAR 2005 0036, which is available for online viewing at www. regulations. gov, or in person viewing at the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center ( EPA/ DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D. C. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4: 30 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is ( 202) 566 1744, and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center is ( 202) 566 1742. An electronic version of the public docket is available at www. regulations. gov. This site can be used to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. When in the system, select " search," then key in the Docket ID Number identified above. Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, 13 Washington, D. C. 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA HQ OAR 2005 0036 and OMB Control Number 2060 0104 in any correspondence.

Part B of the Supporting Statement This Section is not applicable to this ICR.


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2701-2703]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00502]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2013-0017]

QAI Laboratories, Ltd. Applications for Expansion of Recognition

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this notice, OSHA announces the final decision to expand
the scope of recognition for QAI Laboratories, Ltd., (QAI) as a
Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL).

DATES: The expansion of the scope of recognition becomes effective on
January 13, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information regarding this notice is
available from the following sources:
    Press inquiries: Contact Mr. Frank Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office
of Communications, U.S. Department of Labor, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    General and technical information: Contact Mr. Kevin Robinson,
Director, Office of Technical Programs and Coordination Activities,
Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, phone:
(202) 693-2110 or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Notice of Final Decision

    OSHA hereby gives notice of the expansion of the scope of
recognition for QAI to cover the addition of twenty-one test standards
to the NRTL scope of recognition.
    OSHA's recognition of a NRTL signifies that the organization meets
the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.7. Recognition is an
acknowledgment that the organization can perform independent safety
testing and certification of the specific products covered within the
scope of recognition. Each NRTL's scope of recognition includes (1) the
type of products the NRTL may test, with each type specified by the
applicable test standard; and (2) the recognized site(s) that has/have
the technical capability to perform the product-testing and product-
certification activities for test standards within the NRTL's scope.
Recognition is not a delegation or grant of government authority;
however, recognition enables employers to use products approved by the
NRTL to meet OSHA standards that require product testing and
certification.

    The agency processes NRTL applications for initial recognition and
for an expansion or renewal of this recognition, following requirements
in Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7. This appendix requires the agency
publish two notices in the Federal Register in processing an
application. In the first notice, OSHA announces the application and
provides a preliminary finding. In the second notice, the agency
provides the final decision on the application. These notices set forth
the NRTL's scope of recognition or modifications of that scope. OSHA
maintains an informational web page for each NRTL, including QAI,
detailing the NRTL's scope of recognition. These pages are available
from the OSHA website at http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/index.html.
    QAI currently has two facilities (sites) recognized by OSHA for
product testing and certification, with headquarters located at: QAI
Laboratories, Ltd., 3980 North Fraser Way, Burnaby, BC, Canada, V5J
5K5. A complete list of QAI's scope of recognition is available at
https://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/qai.html.
    QAI submitted three applications, one dated October 16, 2017 (OSHA-
2013-0017-0015), to expand recognition to include seventeen additional
test standards. This application was amended on June 12, 2019 (OSHA-
2013-0017-0016), to remove some standards from the original request and
add others. This revised application was amended again on February 11,
2020 (OSHA-2013-0017-0017), to request twenty-one additional standards
to be added to QAI's NRTL scope of recognition. OSHA staff performed a
detailed analysis of the application packet and reviewed other
pertinent information. OSHA did not perform any on-site reviews in
relation to this application. OSHA published the preliminary notice
announcing QAI's expansion applications in the Federal Register on
September 22, 2020 (85 FR 59557). The agency requested comments by
October 7, 2020, but it received no comments in response to this
notice. OSHA is now proceeding with this final notice to grant
expansion of QAI's scope of recognition.
    To obtain or review copies of all public documents pertaining to
QAI's applications, go to www.regulations.gov or contact the Docket
Office, Occupational Safety and Health Administration at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Docket No. OSHA-2013-0017 contains all materials in the record
concerning QAI's recognition.

II. Final Decision and Order

    OSHA examined QAI's expansion applications, the capability to meet
the requirements of the test standards, and other pertinent
information. Based on a review of this evidence, OSHA finds that QAI
meets the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.7 for expansion of the scope of
recognition, subject to the conditions listed below. OSHA, therefore,
is proceeding with this final notice to grant the expansion of QAI's
scope of recognition. OSHA limits the expansion of QAI's scope of
recognition to testing and certification of products for demonstration
of conformance to the test standards listed in Table 1.

 Table 1--List of Appropriate Test Standards for Inclusion in QAI's NRTL
                          Scope of Recognition
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Test standard                     Test standard title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
UL 1740...........................  Standard for Robots and Robotic
                                     Equipment.
UL 22.............................  Standard for Amusement and Gaming
                                     Machines.
UL 73.............................  Standard for Motor-Operated
                                     Appliances.
UL 499............................  Standard for Electric Heating
                                     Machines.
UL 506............................  Standard for Specialty Transformers.
UL 676............................  Standard for Underwater Luminaires
                                     and Submersible Junction Boxes.
UL 1838...........................  Standard for Low Voltage Landscape
                                     Lighting Systems.
UL 2202...........................  Standard for Electric Vehicle (EV)
                                     Charging System Equipment.
UL 2388...........................  Standard for Flexible Lighting
                                     Products.
UL 5085-1.........................  Low Voltage Transformers--Part 1:
                                     General Requirements.
UL 5085-2.........................  Low Voltage Transformers--Part 2:
                                     General Purpose Transformers.
UL 5085-3.........................  Low Voltage Transformers--Part 3:
                                     Class 2 and Class 3 Transformers.
UL 8752...........................  Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED)
                                     Panels.
UL 60950-22.......................  Information Technology Equipment--
                                     Safety--Part 22: Equipment to be
                                     Installed Outdoors.
UL 61010-2-010....................  Electrical Equipment Measurement,
                                     Control and Laboratory Use--Part 2-
                                     010: Particular Requirements for
                                     Laboratory Equipment for the
                                     Heating of Materials.
UL 61010-2-020....................  Electrical Equipment for
                                     Measurement, Control and Laboratory
                                     Use--Part 2-020: Particular
                                     Requirements for Laboratory
                                     Equipment for Laboratory
                                     Centrifuges.
UL 61010-2-081....................  Electrical Equipment for
                                     Measurement, Control and Laboratory
                                     Use--Part 2-081: Particular
                                     Requirements for Laboratory
                                     Equipment for Automatic and Semi-
                                     Automatic Equipment for Analysis
                                     and Other Purposes.
UL 61010-2-091....................  Electrical Equipment for
                                     Measurement, Control and Laboratory
                                     Use--Part 2-091: Particular
                                     Requirements for Laboratory
                                     Equipment for Cabinet X-Ray
                                     Systems.
UL 61010-2-101....................  Electrical Equipment for
                                     Measurement, Control and Laboratory
                                     Use--Part 2-101: Particular
                                     Requirements for In Vitro
                                     Diagnostic (IVD) Medical Equipment.
UL 62368-1........................  Audio/Video, Information and
                                     Communication Technology Equipment--
                                     Part 1: Safety Requirements.
ASME A17.5-2014...................  Elevator and Escalator Electrical
                                     Equipment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OSHA's recognition of any NRTL for a particular test standard is
limited to equipment or materials for which OSHA standards require
third-party testing and certification before using them in the
workplace. Consequently, if a test standard also covers any products
for which OSHA does not require such testing and certification, a
NRTL's scope of recognition does not include these products.
    The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) may approve the
test standards listed above as American National Standards. However,
for convenience, the designation of the standards-developing
organization for the standard as opposed to the ANSI designation may be
used. Under the NRTL Program's policy (see OSHA Instruction CPL 1-0.3,
Appendix C, paragraph XIV), any NRTL recognized for a particular test
standard may use either the proprietary version of the test

standard or the ANSI version of that standard. Contact ANSI to
determine whether a test standard is currently ANSI-approved.

A. Conditions

    In addition to those conditions already required by 29 CFR 1910.7,
QAI must abide by the following conditions of the recognition:
    1. QAI must inform OSHA as soon as possible, in writing, of any
change of ownership, facilities, or key personnel, and of any major
change in the operations as a NRTL, and provide details of the
change(s);
    2. QAI must meet all the terms of the recognition and comply with
all OSHA policies pertaining to this recognition; and
    3. QAI must continue to meet the requirements for recognition,
including all previously published conditions on QAI's scope of
recognition, in all areas for which it has recognition.
    Pursuant to the authority in 29 CFR 1910.7, OSHA hereby expands the
scope of recognition of QAI, subject to the conditions specified in
this notice.

III. Authority and Signature

    Loren Sweatt, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20210, authorized the preparation of this notice. Accordingly, the
agency is issuing this notice pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 657(g)(2),
Secretary of Labor's Order No. 8-2020 (85 FR 58393, Sept. 18, 2020),
and 29 CFR 1910.7.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on January 7, 2021.
Loren Sweatt,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety
and Health.
[FR Doc. 2021-00502 Filed 1-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P