[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13985-13986]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06648]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP18-116-000]

Texas Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Application

    Take notice that on March 14, 2018, Texas Gas Transmission, LLC
(Texas Gas), 9 Greenway Plaza, Suite 2800, Houston, Texas 77046, filed
in Docket No. CP18-116-000, an application pursuant to section 7(b) of
the Natural Gas Act (NGA) requesting to abandon approximately 11.0
miles of its 16-inch-diameter North Lake Pagie pipeline and
approximately 5.7 miles of its 16-inch-diameter Bay Junop-Bay Round
pipeline, including all appurtenant and auxiliary facilities. The
facilities are located approximately 22.1 miles southwest of Houma,
Louisiana, extending offshore in Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana, as part
of Texas Gas' Southeast Supply Lateral, all as more fully set forth in
the application which is on file with the Commission and open to public
inspection. The filing is available for review at the Commission in the
Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's website web
at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
[email protected] or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,
(202) 502-8659.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to Juan
Eligio Jr, Supervisor of Regulatory Affairs, Texas Gas Transmission,
LLC, 9 Greenway Plaza, Suite 2800, Houston, Texas 77046, by telephone
at<PHONE_NUMBER>, by fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email at
[email protected].
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the EA for this proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's
public record for this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and
state agencies of the timing for the completion of all necessary
reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations
within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit seven copies of filings made in the proceeding with the
Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other
party. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentors will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right

to seek court review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 17, 2018.

    Dated: March 27, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-06648 Filed 3-30-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: January 2, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 1)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 51-52]
[DOCID:fr02ja08-12]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0766; FRL-8345-4]
RIN 2070-AJ28

Pesticide Tolerance Crop Grouping Program; Technical Amendment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a final rule in the Federal Register of December 7,
2007 (72 FR 69150) (FRL-8343-1), concerning amendments and revisions to
the pesticide tolerance crop grouping regulations. This document is
being issued to correct an omission in one of the crop grouping tables
and to remove unnecessary scientific names from another table.

DATES: This final rule is effective January 2, 2008.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0766. To access the
electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced

Search,'' then ``Docket Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where
indicated and select the ``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on
the regulations.gov web site to view the docket index or access
available documents. All documents in the docket are listed in the
docket index available in regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov
, or, if only available in hard copy, at the Office

of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rame Cromwell, Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:703-305-5884; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    The Agency included in the final rule a list of those who may be
potentially affected by this action. If you have questions regarding
the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the
person listed under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document and Other
Related Information?

    In addition to using regulations.gov, you may access this Federal
Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the
``Federal Register'' listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.

II. What Does this Technical Amendment Do?

    EPA issued a final rule in the Federal Register of December 7, 2007
(72 FR 69150) (FRL-8343-1), concerning amendments and revisions to the
pesticide tolerance crop grouping regulations. This document is being
issued to correct an omission in the crop grouping table in Sec.
180.41(c)(15)(ii) for Gooseberry, and to remove unnecessary scientific
names from the crop group 21 table in Sec.  180.41(c)(22)(ii).

III. Why is this Technical Amendment Issued as a Final Rule?

    Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), provides that, when an Agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the Agency may issue a final rule without
providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. EPA has
determined that there is good cause for making today's technical
amendment final without prior proposal and opportunity for comment,
because this technical amendment merely adds two subgroup numbers which
were inadvertently left out to one table, and removes unnecessary
scientific nomenclature from another table. This technical amendment
does not change the impact of the December 7, 2007 document. EPA finds
that this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).

IV. Do Any of the Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Apply to this
Action?

    EPA included the necessary statutory and Executive Order reviews in
the December 7, 2007 final rule.

V. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the Agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal
Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Pesticides and pest.

    Dated: December 13, 2007.
James Jones,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic
Substances.

0
Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a, and 371.

0
2. Section 180.41 is amended by revising the entry for ``Gooseberry
(ribes spp)'' in table 1 to paragraph (c)(15)(ii), and by revising the
Crop Group 21 table in paragraph (c)(22)(ii) to read as follows:

Sec.  180.41  Crop group tables.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (15) * * *
    (ii) * * *

      TABLE 1.--Crop Group 13-07: Berry and Small Fruit Crop Group
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Commodities                    Related crop subgroups
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              * * * * * * *
Gooseberry (Ribes spp.).............      13-07B, 13-07D, 13-07E, 13-07F
                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    (22) * * *
    (ii) * * *

             Crop Group 21.--Edible Fungi Group--Commodities
Blewitt (Lepista nuda)
Bunashimeji (Hypsizygus marrmoreus)
Chinese mushroom (Volvariella volvacea) (Bull.) Singer
Enoki (Flammulina velutipes) (Curt.) Singer
Hime-Matsutake (Agaricus blazei) Murill
Hirmeola (Auricularia auricular)
Maitake (Grifola frondosa)
Morel (Morchella spp.)
Nameko (Pholiota nameko)
Net Bearing (Dictyophora)
Oyster mushroom (Pleurotus spp.)
Pom Pom (Hericium erinaceus)
Reishi mushroom (Ganoderma lucidum (Leyss. Fr.) Karst.)
Rodman's agaricus (Agaricus bitorquis) (Quel.) Saccardo
Shiitake mushroom (Lentinula edodes (Berk.) Pegl.)
Shimeji (Tricholoma conglobatum)
Stropharia (Stropharia spp.)
Truffle (Tuber spp.)
White button mushroom (Agaricus bisporous (Lange) Imbach)
White Jelly Fungi (Tremella fuciformis)

[FR Doc. E7-25280 Filed 12-31-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register: January 31, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 20)]
[Notices]
[Page 4545]
[DOCID:fr31ja07-106]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.

Extension: Rule 12b-1; SEC File No. 270-188; OMB Control No. 3235-
0212.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
(``OMB'') a request for extension of the previously approved collection
of information discussed below.
    Rule 12b-1 (17 CFR 270.12b-1) permits a registered open-end
investment company (``mutual fund'') to distribute its own shares and
pay the expenses of distribution out of the mutual fund's assets
provided, among other things, that the mutual fund adopts a written
plan (``Rule 12b-1 plan'') and has in writing any agreements relating
to the implementation of the Rule 12b-1 plan. The rule in part requires
that (i) the adoption or material amendment of a Rule 12b-1 plan be
approved by the mutual fund's directors and shareholders; (ii) the
board review quarterly reports of amounts spent under the Rule 12b-1
plan; and (iii) the board consider continuation of the Rule 12b-1 plan
at least annually. Rule 12b-1 also requires funds relying on the rule
to preserve for six years, the first two years in an easily accessible
place, copies of the Rule 12b-1 plan, related agreements and reports,
as well as minutes of board meetings that describe the factors
considered and the basis for adopting or continuing a Rule 12b-1 plan.
    The board and shareholder approval requirements of Rule 12b-1 are
designed to ensure that fund shareholders and directors receive
adequate information to evaluate and approve a Rule 12b-1 plan. The
requirement of quarterly reporting to the board is designed to ensure
that the Rule 12b-1 plan continues to benefit the fund and its
shareholders. The recordkeeping requirements of the rule are necessary
to enable Commission staff to oversee compliance with the rule.
    The number of hours required to comply with Rule 12b-1 will vary
considerably depending on several factors, including the complexity of
the plan and the number of classes of fund shares covered by the plan,
and is expected to be higher in the first year following adoption of
the proposed amendments than in subsequent years. Based on information
filed with the Commission by funds, Commission staff estimates that
there are approximately 6,536 mutual fund portfolios with Rule 12b-1
plans.
    Rule 12b-1 requires the board of each fund with a Rule 12b-1 plan
to (i) review quarterly reports of amounts spent under the plan, and
(ii) annually consider the plan's continuation (which generally is
combined with the fourth quarterly review); (iii) have each fund
document the policies and procedures it has implemented to enable it to
effect portfolio securities transactions through an executing broker
that also distributes the fund's shares, and (iv) approve those
policies and procedures.
    The number of annual responses per fund portfolio will be four per
year. Thus, there will be an estimated 26,144 industry responses (6,536
fund portfolios x 4 responses per fund portfolio = 26,144 responses) in
the first year and in each subsequent year. Thus, we estimate that
there will be an average of 26,144 industry responses per year over the
three year period for which we are requesting approval of the
information collection burden.
    Based on conversations with fund industry representatives,
Commission staff estimates that for each of the 6,536 mutual fund
portfolios that currently have a Rule 12b-1 plan, the average annual
burden of complying with the rule is 100 hours to maintain the plan.
This estimate takes into account the time needed to prepare quarterly
reports to the board of directors, the board's consideration of those
reports, and the board's annual consideration of the plan's
continuation. The total burden hours per year for all fund portfolios
to comply with current information collection requirements under Rule
12b-1, is therefore estimated to be 653,600 hours (6,536 fund
portfolios x 100 hours per fund portfolio = 653,600 hours). The annual
cost of the hourly burden per fund under the rule is estimated to be
$11,135.00. Thus, we estimate that the total annual cost to all funds
of the Rule 12b-1 hour burden is $72,778,360.00 (6,536 fund portfolios
with Rule 12b-1 plans x $11,135.00 per fund portfolio =
$72,778,360.00).
    If a currently operating fund seeks to (i) adopt a new Rule 12b-1
plan or (ii) materially increase the amount it spends for distribution
under its Rule 12b-1 plan, Rule 12b-1 requires that the fund obtain
shareholder approval. As a consequence, the fund will incur the cost of
a proxy. Based on conversations with fund industry representatives,
Commission staff estimates that approximately three funds per year
prepare a proxy in connection with the adoption or material amendment
of a Rule 12b-1 plan. The staff further estimates that the cost of each
fund's proxy is $30,000. Thus the total annual cost burden of Rule 12b-
1 to the fund industry is $90,000 (3 funds requiring a proxy x $30,000
per proxy).
    The collections of information required by Rule 12b-1 are necessary
to obtain the benefits of the rule. Notices to the Commission will not
be kept confidential. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless
it displays a currently valid control number.
    General comments regarding the above information should be directed
to the following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief

Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312, or send an e-
mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB within
30 days of this notice.

    Dated: January 22, 2007.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-1520 Filed 1-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 156 (Thursday, August 13, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48426-48427]
[FR Doc No: 2015-19243]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2015-1481; Airspace Docket No. 15-AWP-1]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Santa Rosa, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action modifies Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface at Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport,
Santa Rosa, CA. The FAA found modification of the airspace area above
1,200 feet is no longer needed for standard instrument approach
procedures at the airport. This action is necessary for the safety and
management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, October 15, 2015. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed on line at http://www.faa.gov/airtraffic/publications/. The Order is also available for
inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741-6030, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15. For further
information, you can contact the Airspace Policy and ATC Regulations
Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 29591; Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob Riedl, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106,
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it modifies controlled airspace at Santa Rosa, CA.

History

    On May 27, 2015, the FAA published in the Federal Register a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to modify Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at the Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma
County Airport, Santa Rosa, CA (80 FR 30182). Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005, of
FAA Order 7400.9Y, dated August 6, 2014, and effective September 15,
2014, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The Class
E airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2014, and effective September 15,
2014. FAA Order 7400.9Y is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this final rule. FAA Order 7400.9Y lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 modifies Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface at Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport, Santa Rosa, CA.
After a review of the airspace, the FAA found removal of the Class E
airspace area above 1,200 feet necessary as this airspace is no longer
required for standard instrument approach procedures at the airport.
This action enhances the safety and

management of controlled airspace within the NAS.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial, and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation.

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g): 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Y,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2014, and
effective September 15, 2014, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth

* * * * *

AWP CA E5 Santa Rosa, CA [Amended]

Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport, CA
    (Lat. 38[deg]30'35'' N., long. 122[deg]48'46'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
bounded by a line beginning at lat. 38[deg]53'25'' N., long.
122[deg]52'34'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]37'07'' N., long. 122[deg]
46'02'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]22'08'' N., long. 122[deg]38'28'' W.; to
lat. 38[deg]06'41'' N., long. 122[deg]29'59'' W.; to lat.
38[deg]02'10'' N., long. 122[deg]44'09'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]17'57''
N., long. 122[deg]54'37'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]22'58'' N., long.
123[deg]02'34'' W.; lat. 38[deg]29'12'' N., long. 122[deg]56'32''
W.; lat. 38[deg]33'48'' N., long. 123[deg]00'47'' W.; lat.
38[deg]50'14'' N., long. 123[deg]07'20'' W.; thence to the point of
origin.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on July 29, 2015.
Christopher Ramirez,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2015-19243 Filed 8-12-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 8, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47351-47352]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19408]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 168

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0607; FRL-9357-8]
RIN 2070-AJ53

Notification of Submission to the Secretary of Agriculture;
Pesticides; Regulation To Clarify Labeling of Pesticides for Export

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notification of submission to the Secretary of Agriculture.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document notifies the public as required by the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) that the EPA
Administrator has forwarded to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) a draft final rule concerning the revision of
regulations on the labeling of pesticide products and devices intended
solely for export. The draft final rule is not available to the public
until after it has been signed and is made available by EPA.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0607, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), EPA West Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the OPP Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket
available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vera Au, Field and External Affairs
Division (MC 7506P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington DC 20460-
0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. What action is EPA taking?

    Section 25(a)(2)(B) of FIFRA requires the EPA Administrator to
provide the Secretary of Agriculture with a copy of any draft final
rule at least 30 days before signing it in final form for publication
in the Federal Register. This notice announces the submission of a
draft final rule to the Secretary of Agriculture concerning the
revision of regulations clarifying the labeling of pesticide products
and devices intended for export. The draft final rule is not available
to the public until after it has been signed by EPA. If the Secretary
comments in writing regarding the draft final rule within 15 days after
receiving it, the EPA Administrator shall include the comments of the
Secretary, if requested by the Secretary, along with the EPA
Administrator's response to those comments with the final rule that

publishes in the Federal Register. If the Secretary does not comment in
writing within 15 days after receiving the draft final rule, the EPA
Administrator may sign the final rule for publication in the Federal
Register any time after the 15-day period.

II. Do any statutory and executive order reviews apply to this
notification?

    No. This document is merely a notification of submission to the
Secretary of USDA. As such, none of the regulatory assessment
requirements apply to this document.

List of Subjects in Part 168

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Advertising, Exports, Labeling, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: August 2, 2012.
Marty Monell,
Acting Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2012-19408 Filed 8-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:To:Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305)  Food and Drug Administration  5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061  Rockville, MD 20852

 RE: Docket No. FDA- 2014-N-0189

 RE: “Deeming Tobacco Products to Be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act,”  Docket No. FDA- 2014-N-0189 request for extended comment period.

 Attn: Director Zeller:

 I am writing as an individual consumer to request an extension of the comment period for the Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) Proposed Rule Deeming Tobacco Products to be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking and Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the “Proposed Rule”) published at 79 Fed. Reg. 23,142 and Federal Register No. 2014-09491.

On behalf of myself, Kayt Lucas, I am requesting that the comment period for the Proposed Rule be extended by the FDA for an additional 105 days, from its current 75-day period, to 180 days. I wish to provide you with my personal story, as well as science and evidence-based responses to your questions so that you can take my comment into account. I realize that the FDA has the authority under 21 CFR 10.40 to extend this time frame and that the FDA has exercised this authority on numerous occasions in the past.

 I appreciate the opportunity to respond to the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA or the Agency) request for comments on the proposed rule for “Deeming Tobacco Products to Be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act,” Docket No. FDA- 2014-N-0189.  I am in the process of preparing detailed comments in response to the FDA’s numerous requests in the proposed rule, but am very concerned that I will not be able to adequately respond to those requests in the 75-day comment period (i.e., by July 9, 2014).  There are many requests for comments in the proposed rule that I am considering responding to on behalf of consumers of e-cigarette /refillable e-liquid products, many of which require obtaining, summarizing and providing supporting scientific research and other evidence.  The 75-day comment period does not allow sufficient time to develop meaningful or thoughtful responses to many of the questions raised in the proposed rule.  Accordingly, I respectfully urge the Agency extend the current comment period by, at the very least, an additional 105-days (so that comments would be due by October 22, 2014), to provide ample time for stakeholders to provide constructive and valuable feedback on the issues raised in the proposed rule.

I do not believe that such an extension would significantly delay any potential regulatory action on these important issues, and can only aid in providing the FDA with the information that it needs to regulate the growing refillable e-liquid industry in a responsible manner.

 If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.  I thank FDA for the opportunity to provide my views on the proposed rule.

 Sincerely, Kayt Lucas


[Federal Register: June 26, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 122)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 36299]
[DOCID:fr26jn06-31]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2006-0365; FRL-8188-3]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of
Kansas

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the state of Kansas for updating the maintenance
plan to maintain the ozone standard in Kansas City.

DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing by
July 26, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2006-0365 by one of the following methods:
    1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the online instructions for

submitting comments.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail: Gina Kneib, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning
and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66101.
    4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to: Gina Kneib,
Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch,
901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8 to 4:30, excluding legal holidays.
    Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules
section of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to
submit comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gina Kneib at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by e-
mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of the Federal
Register, EPA is approving the state's SIP revision as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipates no relevant adverse
comments to this action. A detailed rationale for the approval is set
forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are
received in response to this action, no further activity is
contemplated in relation to this action. If EPA receives relevant
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this
action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives
adverse comment on part of this rule and if that part can be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those parts of
the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional
information, see the direct final rule which is located in the rules
section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: June 15, 2006.
James B. Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 06-5622 Filed 6-23-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 145 (Monday, July 31, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49287-49288]
[FR Doc No: 2023-16152]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2023-0601]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation: Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway;
West Palm Beach, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations; request for
comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is issuing a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the Flagler Memorial Bridge, across
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AICW), mile 1021.8, at West Palm Beach,
Florida. Palm Beach County and the communities surrounding the bridge
have requested the Coast Guard consider placing additional weekday
restrictions during peak traffic hours to assist with alleviating
vehicle congestion. This deviation will test a change to the drawbridge
operation schedule to determine whether a permanent change to the
schedule is needed. The Coast Guard is seeking comments from the public
regarding this deviation.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 12:01 a.m. on August 1, 2023,
through 11:59 p.m. on January 22, 2024.
    Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before September 29, 2023.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2023-0601 using Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this test
deviation, call or email If you have questions on this test deviation,
call or email Ms. Jennifer Zercher, Bridge Management Specialist,
Seventh Coast Guard District; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis

    The Flagler Memorial Bridge, across Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
(AICW), mile 1021.8, at West Palm Beach, Florida is a double-leaf
bascule bridge with a 24-foot vertical clearance at mean high water in
the closed position. The normal operating schedule is set forth in 33
CFR 117.261(u).
    Palm Beach County and communities surrounding the bridge requested
the Coast Guard consider allowing the drawbridge to remain closed to
navigation during morning and evening peak traffic hours. The Coast
Guard has determined that allowing extended daily closures along this
portion of the AICW will not meet the reasonable needs of navigation.
However, to assist Palm Beach County and communities surrounding the
bridge with alleviating vehicle traffic in the area, the Coast Guard is
issuing the following temporary deviation to test an alternate
drawbridge operating schedule.
    Under this temporary deviation, the Flagler Memorial Bridge will
open on the quarter and three-quarter hour, except that Monday through
Friday (except Federal holidays) from 7:30 to 9 a.m. and from 4 to 6
p.m., the draw need only open on the quarter hour.
    The Coast Guard will also inform the users of the waterways through
our Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the change in operating
schedule for the bridge so that vessel operators can arrange their
transits to minimize any impact caused by the temporary deviation.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the effective
period of this temporary deviation. This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

II. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential and will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period. Your comment
can help shape the outcome of this

temporary deviation. If you submit a comment, please include the docket
number for this temporary deviation, indicate the specific section of
this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for
each suggestion or recommendation.
    Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG- 2023-0601 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If your material cannot be submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions.
    View material in the docket. To view documents mentioned in this
deviation as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. Also, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments, future actions or
updates are posted to the docket.
    We review all comments received, but we will only post comments
that address the topic of this deviation. We may choose not to post
off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive.
    We accept anonymous comments. Comments we post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and submissions in response to this
document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226,
March 11, 2020).

    Dated: July 26, 2023.
Randall D. Overton,
Director, Bridge Administration, Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2023-16152 Filed 7-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


   DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES default		         		Public
Health Service

 ADVANCE \r360  ADVANCE \d3 	Food and Drug Administration

 ADVANCE \r360 	Rockville, MD  20857

July 22, 2004

Mr. Benjamin Cohen

CSPI

1875 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.

Suite 300

Washington,  D.C.  20009-5728

Dear Mr. Cohen:

Your petition requesting the Food and Drug Administration to require
restaurants to

 indicate that the food that they serve contains trans fat from
partially hydrogenated

 vegetable oils, was received by this office on 07/22/2004.  It was
assigned docket number 2004P-0328/CP 1 and it was filed on 07/22/2004.
Please refer to this docket number in future correspondence on this
subject with the Agency.

Please note that the acceptance of the petition for filing is a
procedural matter in that

it in no way reflects an agency decision on the substantive merits of
the petition.

Sincerely,

Lyle D. Jaffe

Division of Dockets Management

Office of Management Programs

Office of Management


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 163 (Thursday, August 22, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43861-43862]
[FR Doc No: 2019-18120]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0631]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of a New Approval of Information Collection: Service
Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about their intention to request Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval of a new web-based tool to assist
aircraft operators in achieving regulatory compliance. Depending on the
specific nature of the operator's route of flight, varying levels of
information are necessary for the FAA to process pre-flight
availability predictions for navigation and surveillance, and, if
needed, an ATC authorization request via this web-based tool. This
collection involves planned routes of flight, aircraft avionics
equipment, and may require identifying information about the requester.
The information collected will be used to predict whether an aircraft
flying the proposed route of flight will have sufficient position
accuracy and integrity for:

(1) Navigation, via the Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM)
SAPT
(2) Surveillance, via the Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast
(ADS-B) SAPT

    In addition, the website will allow operators to request
authorization from ATC to operate aircraft that do not fully meet ADS-B
Out requirements in rule airspace (per 14 CFR 91.225 and 91.227), which
requires ADS-B Out via:

    (3) ADS-B Deviation Authorization Preflight Tool (ADAPT)

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by October 21, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Please send written comments:
    By Electronic Docket: www.regulations.gov (Enter docket number into
search field).
    By mail: Send comments to FAA at following address: Mr. David Gray,
Manager, Surveillance and Broadcast Services, AJM-42, Air Traffic
Organization, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Ave.
SW, Wilbur Wright Building, Washington, DC 20597.
    By fax:<PHONE_NUMBER> (Attention: Mr. David Gray, Manager,
Surveillance and Broadcast Services, AJM-42, Air Traffic Organization,
Federal Aviation Administration).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning
this action, contact Mr. Paul Von Hoene, Aviation Safety, Aviation
Safety Inspector (AC/OPS) at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-XXXX.
    Title: Service Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT).
    Form Numbers: None--Operators will access website at https://sapt.faa.gov.
    Type of Review: New information collection.

    Background: Under 14 CFR 91.103, pilots and operators must use all
available information in planning their flight to ensure that they will
meet the performance requirements for the duration of the flight.
Operators may use the FAA-provided pre-flight Service Availability
Prediction Tool (SAPT) for determining predicted navigation or
surveillance availability before a flight. The SAPT has three main
components: Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) SAPT,
Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) SAPT, and ADS-B
Deviation Authorization Pre-Flight Tool (ADAPT).
    The RAIM SAPT is voluntary and is intended mainly for pilots,
dispatchers, and commercial service providers using Technical Standard
Order (TSO)-C129 equipment to check predicted navigation horizontal
protection level (HPL) for a proposed route of flight. RAIM SAPT
incorporates TSO-C129 Global Positioning System (GPS) RAIM predictions
to check the availability of GPS RAIM for satisfying the area
navigation (RNAV) requirements of AC 90-100A Change 2, Paragraph 10(5).
RAIM SAPT users can view RAIM outage predictions on RAIM Summary
Displays to graphically view RAIM outage predictions for specific
equipment configurations. Additionally, RAIM SAPT users can also use an
XML-based web service, most commonly used by flight planning software,
to enter specific route of flight information by the operator checking
RAIM outage predictions.
    The ADS-B SAPT is provided to help operators comply with 14 CFR
91.225 and 91.227 by predicting whether operators will meet regulatory
requirements and to advise holders of FAA Exemption No. 12555 whether
back-up surveillance will be available where installed aircraft
avionics are not predicted to meet the requirements of 14 CFR
91.227(c)(1)(i) and (iii). For operators of aircraft equipped with TSO-
C129 (SA-On) GPS receivers, the operator may run a preflight prediction
using ADS-B SAPT as one option to meet their requirements. Information
collected via ADS-B SAPT is comparable to that already provided in
flight plans, with the addition of some information about the aircraft
position source's TSO and related capabilities. Operators using an ADS-
B SAPT flight plan form must enter aircraft identification. The ADS-B
SAPT flight plan form does not collect other personally identifiable
information details about the operator.
    When an operator performs a preflight availability prediction using
the FAA's SAPT, the SAPT retains a record of each transaction enabling
the FAA to confirm that an operator took preflight action. The FAA
recommends that operators using an alternate tool retain documentation
that verifies the completion of the satisfactory preflight availability
prediction for each intended route of flight. 84 FR 31713 (July 3,
2019).
    ADAPT is mandatory for operators desiring to fly in ADS-B Out rule
airspace without meeting the ADS-B equipage requirements. ADAPT allows
operators to create an air traffic authorization request to operate in
ADS-B Out rule airspace per 14 CFR 91.225(g). As precursor to using
ADAPT, operators must first complete the ADS-B SAPT Flight Plan Form to
determine if there is sufficient backup surveillance coverage
throughout their planned flight. Operators must enter their personal
contact information to enable an FAA ATC Authorization Authority (AAA)
to reply with either an approval, rejection, or pending decision. ADAPT
does collect personal identifying information to include name,
telephone number, and email address.
    Respondents: These prediction tools are primarily intended for
pilots and dispatchers; anyone who is planning a flight which passes
through U.S. sovereign airspace using an aircraft whose GPS receiver(s)
is/are not guaranteed to meet certain performance requirements or whose
aircraft is not equipped to meet requirements of 14 CFR 91.225.
    Frequency: On occasion as part of flight planning, as required by
FAA policy.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response:
    RAIM SAPT--3 minutes or less.
    ADS-B SAPT--5 minutes or less.
    (It is anticipated that RAIM SAPT and ADS-B SAPT will be automated
into eXtensible Markup Language (XML) that operators may use to plan
flights, eliminating manual data-entry).
    ADAPT--7 minutes or less (includes up to 2 minutes for FAA email
response).
    Estimated Total Annual Burden:
    RAIM SAPT--Approximately 673,425 minutes.
    ADS-B SAPT--Approximately 11,062,128 minutes.
    ADAPT--Approximately 15,330,000 minutes.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 15, 2019.
David E. Gray,
Group Manager, Surveillance and Broadcast Services (AJM-42), Program
Management Office, Air Traffic Organization, Federal Aviation
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2019-18120 Filed 8-21-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P