[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 183 (Tuesday, September 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 57165]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23986]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

September 15, 2015.
    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP15-1269-000.
    Applicants: Gulf Shore Energy Partners, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Gulf Shore Energy--Change of
Ownership Filing to be effective 10/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 9/14/15.
    Accession Number: 20150914-5124.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/28/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-1270-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Reclassify NC Amgt as NC Neg
Rate Agmt (Atmos 9399) to be effective 1/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 9/15/15.
    Accession Number: 20150915-5017.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/28/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-1271-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP.
    Description: Compliance filing DCP--2015 Revenue Crediting Report.
    Filed Date: 9/15/15.
    Accession Number: 20150915-5028.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/28/15.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and Sec.  385.214) on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests
may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to
the proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP15-1188-001.
    Applicants: National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Scheduling & Curtailment (RP15-1188
Amendment) to be effective 10/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 9/14/15.
    Accession Number: 20150914-5195.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/28/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-1189-001.
    Applicants: Empire Pipeline, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Scheduling & Curtailment (RP15-1189
Amendment) Empire to be effective 10/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 9/14/15.
    Accession Number: 20150914-5189.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/28/15.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 15, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-23986 Filed 9-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19572-19574]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08074]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2015-0684; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-215-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier,
Inc.) Model DHC-7-1 and DHC-7-100 airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by reports of cracks that were discovered in the outboard
nacelles upper longeron channels and angles. This proposed AD would
require a one-time detailed visual inspection for cracking in the
outboard nacelles upper longeron channels and angles; and repair if
necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracks in the
outboard nacelles upper longeron channels and angles, which could lead
to the loss of stiffness in the forward engine mount; and possible
catastrophic failure.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 28, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Viking Air Limited, 9574 Hampden Road, Sidney, British Columbia V8L
8V5, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.vikingair.com. You may view this

referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
0684; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aziz Ahmed, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-0684;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-215-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2014-34, dated October 2, 2014 (referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an
unsafe condition for all Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Model DHC-7-1 and DHC-7-100
airplanes. The MCAI states:

    Longitudinal cracks were discovered in the outboard nacelles
upper longeron channels and angles at station XN1 78. The cracks
were partially hidden by bearing blocks, Part Number (P/N) 75420978,
at the nacelle latch locations. Undetected, these cracks may lead to
the loss of stiffness in the forward engine mount; which may lead to
a catastrophic failure.

    Required actions include a one-time detailed visual inspection for
cracking of the outboard nacelles upper longeron channels and angles.
Corrective actions include repair, if necessary. You may examine the
MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-0684.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Viking Air Limited has issued Service Bulletin V7-54-02, Revision
NC, dated December 14, 2012. The service information describes
procedures for an inspection for cracks in the outboard nacelles upper
longeron channels and angles; and repair if necessary. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI. This service information is
reasonably available; see ADDRESSES for ways to access this service
information.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these
same type designs.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 10 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We also estimate that it would take about 3 work-hours per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of this proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $2,550, or $255
per product.
    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier,
Inc.): Docket No. FAA-2015-0684; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-215-
AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by May 28, 2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate
previously held by Bombardier, Inc.) Model DHC-7-1 and DHC-7-100
airplanes, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 54, Nacelles/
Pylons.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracks that were discovered
in the outboard nacelles upper longeron channels and angles. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct cracks in the outboard
nacelles upper longeron channels and angles, which could lead to the
loss of stiffness in the forward engine mount; and possible
catastrophic failure.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspection and Repair

    Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, do a one-
time detailed visual inspection for cracking in the outboard
nacelles upper longeron channels and angles, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Viking Air Limited Service Bulletin
V7-54-02, Revision NC, dated December 14, 2012. If any cracking is
found during the inspection required by this paragraph: Before
further flight, repair using a method approved by the Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA; or Transport
Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or Viking Air Limited's (Type
Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) TCCA Design
Approval Organization (DAO).

(h) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO,
ANE-170, FAA; or TCCA; or Viking Air Limited's (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) TCCA DAO. If approved by the
DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.

(i) Special Flight Permits

    Special flight permits, as described in Section 21.197 and
Section 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199), are not allowed.

(j) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2014-34, dated October 2,
2014, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-0684.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Viking Air Limited, 9574 Hampden Road, Sidney, British Columbia V8L
8V5, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.vikingair.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 27, 2015.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-08074 Filed 4-10-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 2, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 64)]
[Notices]
[Page 18022-18026]
[DOCID:fr02ap08-109]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57577, File No. SR-MSRB-2007-06]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board; Notice of Filing of Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 and Order Granting
Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change as Modified by Amendment
Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto Relating to an Amendment to the Municipal
Securities Information Library[supreg] System To Establish a Pilot
System for Consolidated Dissemination of Disclosure Documents and
Related Information Through an Internet-Based Public Access Portal

March 28, 2008.

I. Introduction

    On November 15, 2007, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board
(``MSRB'' or ``Board''), filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to establish a pilot system (the
``pilot

portal'') for the consolidated dissemination, through an Internet-based
public access portal, of disclosure documents and related information
that the MSRB currently receives through its existing facilities. The
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on December 28, 2007.\3\ The Commission directly received one comment
letter regarding the proposal.\4\ On January 30, 2008, the MSRB filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposal.\5\ On March 7, 2008, the MSRB filed
Amendment No. 2 to the proposal.\6\ The text of Amendment Nos. 1 and 2
is available on the MSRB's Web site (http://www.msrb.org), at the
MSRB's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
This order provides notice of the proposed rule change as modified by
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 and approves the proposed rule change as amended
on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57004 (December 20,
2007), 72 FR 73941 (December 28, 2007) (``Commission's Notice'').
    \4\ See letter from Peter J. Schmitt, CEO, DPC DATA Inc. (``DPC
DATA''), dated January 23, 2008. The MSRB forwarded to the
Commission a comment letter it received on this rule filing. See
supra note 5. The Commission considered both comment letters.
    \5\ In Amendment No. 1, the MSRB stated that ``the pilot portal
would be established and operated pending establishment of a
permanent Internet-based public access system to be known as the
Electronic Municipal Market Access system (``EMMA''),'' and amended
Exhibit 2 of the proposed rule change by submitting a comment letter
about the proposed rule received by the MSRB from Philip Moyer, CEO,
EDGAR Online, Inc. (``EDGAR Online''), to Ernesto A. Lanza, Senior
Associate General Counsel, MSRB, dated December 17, 2007. The
Commission notes that a proposal to establish any permanent system
would be required to be submitted to the Commission for Commission
consideration as a proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b) of
the Act.
    \6\ In Amendment No. 2, the MSRB partially amended the text of
the proposed rule change to clarify that the pilot portal would be
implemented as a service of EMMA as a pilot facility within the MSIL
system. In addition, the MSRB discusses the comment letter included
in Amendment No. 1 (the EDGAR Online letter), together with the
comment letter received by the Commission in response to the
Commission's Notice (the DPC DATA Inc. letter). Finally, Amendment
No. 2 requests that the Commission approve an operational date for
the pilot portal of March 31, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    MSRB Rule G-36 requires that a broker, dealer or municipal
securities dealer that acts as managing or sole underwriter for most
primary offerings of municipal securities send the official statement
(``OS'') and Form G-36(OS) to the Municipal Securities Information
Library[supreg] or ``MSIL'' system.\7\ In addition, if the offering is
an advance refunding and an escrow deposit agreement or other advance
refunding document (``ARD'') has been prepared, the ARD and Form G-
36(ARD) also must be sent to the MSIL system by the managing or sole
underwriter. OSs and ARDs collected by the MSIL system currently are
made available in paper form, subject to copying charges, at the MSRB's
public access facility in Alexandria, Virginia, and electronically by
paid subscription on a daily over-night basis and by purchase of annual
back-log collections.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Municipal Securities Information Library and MSIL are
registered trademarks of the MSRB. The MSIL system's OS/ARD system
was initially approved by the Commission in 1991 and amended in 2001
to establish the current optional electronic submission system. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 29298 (June 13, 1991), 56 FR
28194 (June 19, 1991) (SR-MSRB-1990-2); Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 44458 (June 20, 2001), 66 FR 34495 (June 28, 2001) (SR-
MSRB-2001-03).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change would establish, on a pilot basis, an
Internet-based public access portal to provide free access to OSs and
ARDs received by the MSRB under Rule G-36. Copies of all such OSs and
ARDs received by the MSRB on or after implementation of the pilot
portal will be made available to the public as portable document format
(PDF) files for viewing, printing and downloading at the pilot portal
promptly after acceptance and processing, and will remain publicly
available for the life of the municipal securities. The pilot portal
will provide on-line search functions utilizing the MSIL system
computer to ensure that users of the pilot portal are able to readily
identify and access documents that relate to specific municipal
securities based on a broad range of search parameters. The pilot
portal will be designed to provide a user searching for a particular
municipal security with a comprehensive display of relevant information
concerning such security available from the MSRB's various information
systems on a single screen or related set of screens. The pilot portal
will provide basic identifying information for the security, direct
access to the OS submitted by the underwriter to the MSIL system, price
information from the MSRB's Real-Time Transaction Reporting System
(``RTRS'') for the most recent trades in such security (as well as
historical price information), and, if the security has been advance
refunded by a refunding issue, any ARDs submitted by the underwriter to
the MSIL system in connection with such advance refunding.
    The proposed rule change consists of an amendment to the MSRB's
existing Official Statement and Advance Refunding Document (OS/ARD)
system of the MSIL system, under which the MSRB proposes to establish
and operate the pilot portal while it develops a proposal to establish
a permanent Internet-based public access system (the ``permanent
system'').\8\ The MSRB requests approval of the pilot portal for a
period of one year from the date it becomes operational, subject to
earlier termination upon Commission consideration and approval,
pursuant to Section 19(b) of the Act, of a permanent system. The pilot
portal would operate for a limited period of time for electronic
submissions of all OSs and ARDs to the MSRB and free public access to
such documents through a centralized Internet-based portal.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Proposed rule changes to establish a permanent system were
not included by the MSRB in this filing regarding the pilot portal.
The establishment of a permanent system would be considered by the
Commission following a proposed rule change filing by the MSRB
pursuant to Section 19(b) of the Act.
    \9\ The MSRB has stated it is developing an ``access equals
delivery'' standard for OS dissemination under Rule G-32, concerning
disclosures in connection with new issues. Neither the ``access
equals delivery'' standard nor any kind of permanent system were
included by the MSRB in the filing subject to this order. Such
issues would be considered by the Commission following a filing by
the MSRB pursuant to Section 19(b) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The MSRB requests that the Commission find good cause, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, for approving Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 prior
to the thirtieth day after publication of notice of filing of Amendment
Nos. 1 and 2 in the Federal Register. The MSRB believes that the
Commission has good cause for granting accelerated approval of
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 because the amendments do not substantively
alter the original proposed rule change.
    A full description of the proposal is contained in the Commission's
Notice.

III. Summary of Comments and the MSRB's Response

    As previously noted, the MSRB received one comment letter from
EDGAR Online relating to this proposed rule change, which it forwarded
to the Commission. The Commission directly received one comment letter
from DPC DATA regarding the proposed rule change.\10\ In its comment
letter, EDGAR Online strongly supported the MSRB's proposed rule
change, stating that the proposed portal will encourage transparency in
the municipal securities market and create a healthy ecosystem of
information that will ultimately benefit both the investment community
and the municipalities that seek access

to public markets. Although EDGAR Online recommended that the
Commission build a publicly accessible storage and dissemination system
for all municipal filings, EDGAR Online strongly supported the MSRB's
proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Comment letter submitted by Peter J. Schmitt, CEO of DPC
DATA Inc., dated January 23, 2008, http://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-
msrb-2007-06/msrb200706-1.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In commenting on this proposed rule change, DPC DATA, a Nationally
Recognized Municipal Securities Information Repository (NRMSIR),
expressed concerns about the proposed portal.\11\ It stated that the
MSRB's plans for its proposed MSIL-based Web portal go well beyond its
organizational mandate as stated in Section 15B(b)(2)(C) of the Act. It
indicated a belief that some of the proposed features, such as nine-
digit CUSIP searches, are well in excess of those provided by the
Commission's EDGAR system. Further, it expressed concern that ``by
providing value-added content and features on its proposed Web portal,
the MSRB will not only effectively take over the business of providing
value-added content to commercial firms, but it will fund this activity
with fees collected from broker/dealers.'' DPC DATA urged the
Commission to restrain the MSRB from offering what it viewed as value-
added content and features that, in its view, will necessarily inflict
economic harm on existing data vendors, and inflict the harm unevenly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ DPC Data also expressed a number of concerns about other
aspects of the MSRB's plans for the EMMA system, such as the
inclusion of continuing disclosure documents, that are not the
subject of this proposed rule change. Only the comments about the
subject of this proposed rule change are discussed in this order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In Amendment No. 2, the MSRB stated that it has carefully reviewed
the statements made by EDGAR Online and DPC DATA and continues to
believe that the proposal is consistent with its statutory mandate
under the Act. The MSRB concluded that developing the pilot portal
through the adaptation and upgrading of existing internal MSRB
systems--including but not limited to the MSIL system, the Real-Time
Transaction Reporting System, and the MSRB's in-house access control
systems--combined with the creation of a custom user interface designed
for use by retail investors, is the most prudent and efficient manner
of achieving the MSRB's goal of ensuring equal access for all market
participants to the critical disclosure information needed by investors
in the municipal securities market.
    In addition, the MSRB continues to believe that the proposal,
including the functionalities thereof, will not impose any burden on
competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes
of the Act. The MSRB represented that documents and information
provided through the portal will be available to all persons on an
equal basis. The MSRB also stated in Amendment No. 2 that it will
continue to make the full collection of documents available by
subscription on an equal basis without imposing restrictions on
subscribers from re-disseminating such documents or from otherwise
offering value-added services and products based on such documents on
terms determined by each subscriber. The MSRB believes that any
incidental impact on commercial enterprises would not create an unequal
burden among such enterprises. The MSRB also believes that the
experience of private enterprises involved in the dissemination of
EDGAR materials and related value-added services, such as those
described by EDGAR Online, supports the MSRB's conclusion that EMMA
will not have an inappropriate impact on the marketplace for such
services and in fact may very well promote further growth and
innovation in this area.
    The MSRB believes that EMMA's functionalities further its core
mission by modernizing the dissemination of documents and are needed
for the purposes for which the pilot portal is being created, and that
such functionalities are not inconsistent with any statutory
limitations placed on MSRB activities. The MSRB believes that none of
these functionalities constitute value-added services that compete
inappropriately with the private sector. Rather, the MSRB believes that
these functionalities are critical for EMMA's operation as an assured,
free centralized source of information for retail investors that
provides investors with the necessary tools to find the information for
which they are searching and to understand such information once it is
found.

IV. Commission Discussion of Comments and the MSRB's Responses

    In its evaluation of the proposed rule changes and the MSRB's
responses to the comments received by the Commission, the Commission
has carefully considered DPC DATA's and EDGAR Online's comments. In its
evaluation of DPC DATA's comments, the Commission has particularly
noted DPC DATA's statement that the proposed pilot portal and the
MSRB's planned permanent system \12\ should not compete with vendors in
offering value-added features and services related to the handling of
disclosure documents and that the proposed rule change would impose an
unequal burden on competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Again, the Commission notes that the proposed rule change
before it concerns only the pilot portal proposed to be implemented
within MSIL. Accordingly, the specific features of any permanent
system to be proposed by the MSRB would be subject to Commission
review, including notice and comment pursuant to Section 19(b), at
such time as the MSRB files it as a proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 15B(b)(2)(C) of the Act requires that, before approving
Board rules, the Commission find that the proposed rules do not impose
any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Pursuant to current MSRB Rule G-36, which
was approved \13\ by the Commission after notice and comment pursuant
to Section 19(b) of the Act, and as a result of the establishment of
the MSIL system, also approved \14\ by the Commission after notice and
comment pursuant to Section 19(b), the MSRB has collected and
disseminated official statements, advance refunding documents, and
associated indexing information for many years. OSs and ARDs collected
by the MSIL system currently are made available in paper form, subject
to copying charges, at the MSRB's public access facility in Alexandria,
Virginia, and electronically by paid subscription on a daily over-night
basis and by purchase of annual back-log collections. By making use of
the Internet for access to OSs and ARDs, the pilot portal would
modernize the method of delivery of such documents to investors and
others, and make them more readily accessible by investors and others,
but not alter the availability of such documents to commercial vendors
or their ability to disseminate such information, together with
whatever value-added products they may wish to provide.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 28081 (June 1, 1990),
55 FR 23333 (June 7, 1990) (SR-MSRB-89-9).
    \14\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 29298 (June 13, 1991),
56 FR 28194 (June 19, 1991) (SR-MSRB-90-2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The MSRB has proposed for the pilot portal to provide on-line
search functions utilizing its existing MSIL system computer index to
ensure that users of the pilot portal are able to readily identify and
access documents that relate to specific municipal securities based on
a broad range of search parameters. The Commission includes a variety
of search methods in its EDGAR system and believes that a search
function is an important component of an information system, such as
the pilot portal, because without it users could have significant
difficulty

accessing all the documents and navigating the system.
    As noted above, the pilot portal would also integrate information
from the MSRB's RTRS into the pilot system, and thereby provide price
information for the most recent trades in a security (as well as
historical price information), and, if the security has been advance
refunded by a refunding issue, provide any ARDs submitted by the
underwriter to the MSIL system in connection with such advance
refunding. The MSRB imposes no restrictions on the redissemination of
RTRS data. As a result, the Commission does not view the inclusion of
RTRS information in the pilot portal to significantly alter the current
competitive situation for information vendors, who may obtain this
information and provide associated value-added products if they desire
to do so.
    The MSRB has stated that documents provided through the pilot
portal will be available to all persons on an equal basis and that the
MSRB will continue to make the full collection of documents available
by subscription on an equal basis without imposing restrictions on
subscribers from re-disseminating such documents or from otherwise
offering value-added service and products \15\ based on such documents
on terms determined by each subscriber. For all of these reasons, the
Commission believes that the proposed rule change does not impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ The Commission notes that information vendors were able to
provide value-added services with regard to the information obtained
from EDGAR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission does not believe the proposal exceeds the Board's
authority under Section 15B of the Act. As the Commission stated in its
release approving Rule G-36,\16\ Section 15B(b)(2)(C) is a broad grant
of authority to the Board to, among other purposes, remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market in municipal
securities, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest.\17\ It is important for market professionals and investors to
have access to complete and timely descriptive information about
municipal securities and municipal securities issuers. The pilot portal
should enhance access to information about new offerings of municipal
securities. The Commission believes that the information contained in
official statements and advance refunding documents is valuable to
investors and should be widely available. Investors in municipal
securities, municipal analysts, investment advisors, and the broker-
dealers who effect transactions in the municipal market would benefit
from easier access to current OSs and ARDs. The Commission also
believes that the proposed rule change does not implicate Section
15B(d)(2) of the Act, commonly known as the Tower Amendment, because it
imposes no requirements, directly or indirectly, on issuers--it instead
enhances access to information already being provided by the MSRB.
Further, the Commission believes that establishment of the pilot portal
should help prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices and
protect investors and the public interest by enhancing the availability
of disclosure information contained in OSs and ARDs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 28081 (June 1, 1990),
55 FR 23333 (June 7, 1990) (SR-MSRB-89-9).
    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-4(b)(2)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
Proposed Rule Change

    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the MSRB \18\ and, in particular, the
requirements of Section 15B(b)(2)(C) of the Act \19\ and the rules and
regulations thereunder. Section 15B(b)(2)(C) of the Act requires, among
other things, that the MSRB's rules be designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in municipal
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market in municipal securities, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ In approving this rule the Commission notes that it has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-4(b)(2)(C).
    \20\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Commission finds that the pilot facility will
remove impediments to and help perfect the mechanisms of a free and
open market in municipal securities, assist in preventing fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, and will in general promote
investor protection and the public interest by improving access for all
market participants to the critical disclosure information needed by
investors in the municipal securities market.
    The Commission also finds good cause to approve Amendment Nos. 1
and 2 to the proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after the
date of publication of notice of filing of the amendments in the
Federal Register. The proposed rule change was published in the Federal
Register on December 28, 2007.\21\ Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 do not
substantively change the proposal as published in the Federal Register.
The amendments included a comment letter on this proposal filed with
the MSRB, responded to the comment letter filed with the MSRB and the
comment letter filed with the Commission, provided a name for the
public access portal and requested a delayed operational date for the
pilot facility. The Commission finds that it is in the public interest
to approve the proposed rule change as soon as possible to expedite its
implementation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, the Commission believes good cause exists, consistent
with Sections 15B(b)(2)(C) and 19(b) of the Act,\22\ to approve
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 to the proposed rule change on an accelerated
basis. The Commission approves an operational date for the pilot portal
of March 31, 2008, as requested by the MSRB.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-4(b)(2)(C), and 78s(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VI. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-MSRB-2007-06 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MSRB-2007-06. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will

post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the MSRB. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-MSRB-2007-06 and should be submitted on or before April
23, 2008.

VII. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and
in particular Section 15B(b)(2)(C) of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder.
    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\23\ that the proposed rule change (SR-MSRB-2007-06), as modified
by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2, be, and it hereby is, approved on an
accelerated basis from March 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009, subject to
earlier termination upon Commission consideration and approval,
pursuant to Section 19(b) of the Act, of a permanent system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-6837 Filed 4-1-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 139 (Friday, July 21, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33785-33787]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15121]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-9516; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-053-AD;
Amendment 39-18964; AD 2017-15-04]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 787-8 and 787-9 airplanes. This AD was
prompted by wire harness chafing on the electro-mechanical actuators
(EMAs) for certain spoilers due to insufficient separation with
adjacent structure. This AD requires replacement of affected EMAs. We
are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective August 25, 2017.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of August 25,
2017.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9516.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9516; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office
(phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Schauer, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 787-8 and 787-9 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on December 28, 2016 (81 FR 95536) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM
was prompted by wire harness chafing on the EMAs for certain spoilers
due to insufficient separation with adjacent structure. The NPRM
proposed to require replacement of affected EMAs. We are issuing this
AD to prevent chafing and consequent wire damage that could result in a
potential source of ignition in the flammable leakage zone and a
consequent fire or explosion.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and
the FAA's response to each comment.

Support for the NPRM

    Boeing indicated its support for the intent of the NPRM.

Request To Reduce Compliance Time

    The Air Line Pilots Association, International, (ALPA), supported
the intent of the NPRM but asked that the compliance time in the
proposed AD be reduced from 40 to 20 months. The commenter stated that
the NPRM's 40-month compliance time, combined with the release date of
Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB270030-00, Issue 001, dated
October 22, 2015, would provide operators in excess of 56

months to comply. ALPA stated that it believes that operators have had
sufficient time to schedule the proposed maintenance procedures, and
recommended the shorter compliance time, which would provide an overall
timeframe of 36 months from the release date of Boeing Service Bulletin
B787-81205-SB270030-00, Issue 001, dated October 22, 2015, to resolve
the issue.
    We do not agree with the commenter's request to reduce the
compliance time. In developing an appropriate compliance time for this
action, we considered the safety implications, parts availability, and
normal maintenance schedules for timely accomplishment of replacement
of the EMAs. Further, we arrived at the proposed compliance time with
the manufacturer's concurrence. In consideration of all of these
factors, we determined that the compliance time, as proposed,
represents an appropriate interval in which the EMA can be replaced in
a timely manner within the fleet, while still maintaining an adequate
level of safety. Most ADs, including this one, permit operators to
accomplish the requirements of an AD at a time earlier than the
specified compliance time; therefore, an operator may choose to replace
the EMA at any time within the 40-month compliance time. If additional
data are presented that would justify a shorter compliance time, we may
consider further rulemaking on this issue. We have not changed the AD
in this regard.

Request To Extend Compliance Time

    United Airlines (UA) asked that the compliance time in the proposed
AD be extended. UA stated that considering the extensive ground time
required for implementing the corrective action, additional time is
necessary.
    We do not agree with the commenter's request to extend the
compliance time. UA did not suggest an alternative compliance time. In
developing an appropriate compliance time for this action, we
considered the safety implications, parts availability, and normal
maintenance schedules for the timely accomplishment of the replacement.
In consideration of these items, we have determined that a 40-month
compliance time will ensure an acceptable level of safety and allow the
replacements to be done during scheduled maintenance intervals for most
affected operators. We have not changed the AD in this regard.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD as proposed, except for minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB270030-00, Issue
001, dated October 22, 2015. The service information describes
procedures for replacing affected EMAs with new EMAs. This service
information is reasonably available because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 19 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on  U.S.
               Action                         Labor cost            Parts  cost       product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMA replacement.....................  32 work-hours x $85 per             \1\ $0          $2,720         $51,680
                                       hour = $2,720 per EMA
                                       replacement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Parts cost is not included in the service information, but Boeing has indicated that existing parts can be
  modified to become the new parts.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2017-15-04 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18964; Docket No.

FAA-2016-9516; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-053-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective August 25, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 787-8 and 787-9
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing
Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB270030-00, Issue 001, dated October
22, 2015.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27, Flight
controls.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by wire harness chafing on the electro-
mechanical actuators (EMAs) for certain spoilers due to insufficient
separation with adjacent structure. We are issuing this AD to
prevent chafing and consequent wire damage that could result in a
potential source of ignition in the flammable leakage zone and a
consequent fire or explosion.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) EMA Replacement

    Within 40 months after the effective date of this AD, replace
the EMAs with new EMAs, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB270030-00,
Issue 001, dated October 22, 2015.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. To be approved, the
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs
(h)(4)(i) and (h)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.

(i) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Sean Schauer,
Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA,
Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:
425-917-6479; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB270030-00, Issue 001,
dated October 22, 2015.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 12, 2017.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-15121 Filed 7-20-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

________________________________________________

90-Day Notice of						)

								)

	REDEMPTION, INC.				)	               Docket 6945

	d/b/a ISLAND AIR SERVICE			)

								)

under 49 U.S.C. § 41734 and 14 C.F.R. 323 of intent	)

to terminate Essential Air Service at Karluk, Alaska		)

________________________________________________)

90-DAY NOTICE OF REDEMPTION, INC.

d/b/a ISLAND AIR SERVICE OF INTENT

TO TERMINATE ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE

AT KARLUK, ALASKA

NOTE:	Objections to this notice of intent to terminate service must be filed on or before October 25, 2004

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to:

Robert Stanford

President

Redemption, Inc.

d/b/a Island Air Service

P.O. Box 125

Kodiak, AK  99615

(907) 486-6196 (office)

(907) 486-5529 (fax)

October 5, 2004

BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

________________________________________________

90-Day Notice of						)

								)

	REDEMPTION, INC.				)	               Docket 6945

	d/b/a ISLAND AIR SERVICE			)

								)

under 49 U.S.C. § 41734 and 14 C.F.R. 323 of intent	)

to terminate Essential Air Service at Karluk, Alaska		)

________________________________________________)

90-DAY NOTICE OF REDEMPTION, INC.

d/b/a ISLAND AIR SERVICE OF INTENT

TO TERMINATE ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE

AT KARLUK, ALASKA

Redemption, Inc. d/b/a Island Air Service (“Island Air”) hereby gives 90-days notice, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 41734 and 14 C.F.R. 323, of its intent to terminate Essential Air Service (“EAS”) at Karluk, Alaska.

In support of this notice, Island Air states as follows:

Island Air’s principal place of business if P.O. Box 125, Kodiak AK,  99615.

Island Air holds a certificate of public convenience and necessity, authorizing it to engage in scheduled air transportation or persons, property and mail.

Karluk is not served by any other certificated carrier.

Island Air currently provides roundtrip service between Kodiak and Karluk three days a week with Piper PA-32 5-passenger aircraft.  The flights operate on Monday, Wednesday and Friday, departing Kodiak at 0915 and arriving in Karluk at 1005.  The return flight departs Karluk at 1010 and arrives in Kodiak at 1055.

The Department made the most recent EAS determination for Karluk in Order 95-5-2.

Declines in general economic activity and commercial fishing have reduced the traffic to and from Karluk, particularly during the winter.  Island Air can no longer provide air service to Karluk without substantial subsidy.

WHEREFORE: Redemption, Inc. d/b/a Island Air Service gives 90-days notice of its intent to terminate all air service to Karluk, AK on or before January 4, 2005.  Island Air also requests waiver of the provisions of 14 C.F.R. 323 so that it may terminate services as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Redemption, Inc. d/b/a Island Air Service

_________________________

Robert Stanford, President

October 5, 2004

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing 90-day notice of Redemption, Inc. d/b/a Island Air Service to terminate Essential Air Service at Karluk, AK has been served this date upon the following persons:

Village of Karluk

IRA Traditional Council

Alecia Reft, President

P.O. Box 22

Karluk, AK 99608

(by registered mail)

The Honorable Frank Murkowski

Governor

State of Alaska

P.O. Box 110001

Juneau, AK  99811-0001

(by registered mail)

Regional Director, Central Region

Alaska Department of Transportation

4111 Aviation Avenue

P.O. Box 196900

Anchorage, AK  99519-6900

(by registered mail)

William J. Jones, Esq.

Assistant General Counsel

Transportation Division

U.S. Postal Service

475 L’Enfant Plaza West, S.W.

Washington, D.C.  20260

_________________________

Robert Stanford

October 5, 2004


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 23, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57451-57456]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20142]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Part 744

[Docket No. 160719631-6631-01]
RIN 0694--AH06

Addition of Certain Persons to the Entity List

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rule amends the Export Administration Regulations
(EAR) by adding ten persons under fourteen entries to the Entity List.
The ten persons who are added to the Entity List have been determined
by the U.S. Government to be acting contrary to the national security
or foreign policy interests of the United States. These ten persons
will be listed on the Entity List under the destinations of Iraq, the
Philippines, Syria, and Turkey.

DATES: This rule is effective August 23, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chair, End-User Review Committee,
Office of the Assistant Secretary, Export Administration, Bureau of
Industry and Security, Department of Commerce, Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>,
Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to part 744) identifies entities
and other persons reasonably believed to be involved, or to pose a
significant risk of being or becoming involved, in activities contrary
to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United
States. The EAR imposes additional license requirements on, and limits
the availability, of most license exceptions for, exports, reexports,
and transfers (in-country) to those listed.

The ``license review policy'' for each listed entity or other person is
identified in the License Review Policy column on the Entity List and
the impact on the availability of license exceptions is described in
the Federal Register notice adding entities or other persons to the
Entity List. BIS places entities and other persons on the Entity List
pursuant to sections of part 744 (Control Policy: End-User and End-Use
Based) and part 746 (Embargoes and Other Special Controls) of the EAR.
    The ERC, composed of representatives of the Departments of Commerce
(Chair), State, Defense, Energy and, where appropriate, the Treasury,
makes all decisions regarding additions to, removals from, or other
modifications to the Entity List. The ERC makes all decisions to add an
entry to the Entity List by majority vote and all decisions to remove
or modify an entry by unanimous vote.

ERC Entity List Decisions

Additions to the Entity List

    This rule implements the decision of the ERC to add ten persons
under fourteen entries to the Entity List. These ten persons are being
added on the basis of Sec.  744.11 (License requirements that apply to
entities acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States) of the EAR. The fourteen entries added
to the entity list consist of three entries in Iraq, one entry in the
Philippines, four entries in Syria, and six entries in Turkey. There
are fourteen entries for the ten persons because two of the persons are
listed in multiple locations, resulting in four additional entries.
    The ERC reviewed Sec.  744.11(b) (Criteria for revising the Entity
List) in making the determination to add these ten persons under
fourteen entries to the Entity List. Under that paragraph, persons and
those acting on behalf of such persons may be added to the Entity List
if there is reasonable cause to believe, based on specific and
articulable facts, that they have been involved, are involved, or pose
a significant risk of being or becoming involved in, activities that
are contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of
the United States. Paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of Sec.  744.11
include an illustrative list of activities that could be contrary to
the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States.
    Pursuant to Sec.  744.11(b)(1) of the EAR, the ERC determined that
nine persons, located in the destinations of Iraq, Syria and Turkey, be
added to the Entity List for actions contrary to the national security
or foreign policy interests of the United States. The ERC determined
that there is reasonable cause to believe, based on specific and
articulable facts, that Sekirin (Sekirin Tekstil lthalat Ihracat Ic ve
Dis Ticaret Limited Sirketi), Yildiz (Ag Yildiz Insaat Gayrimenkul
Tasimacilik Pazarlama Ithalat Ihracat ve Ticaret Ltd. Sirketi), and
their seven associates (Luqman Yasin Yunus Shgragi, Yunus Luqman Yasin
Shgragi, Abd Al Hakim Luqman Jasim Muhammad, Muhammad `ulwan Al-Shawi,
Ala al-Shawi, Ali Guzel, and Jamal Jum'ah al-Shawi) have been involved
in actions contrary to the national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States. Sekirin, Yildiz, and their seven
associates have been involved in activities that are contrary to the
national security and foreign policy interests of the United States by
supporting persons engaged in acts of terror as set forth in Sec.
744.11(b)(1) of the EAR. Specifically, these entities have been
providing logistical and material support to the Islamic State of Iraq
and the Levant (ISIL).
    In addition, pursuant to Sec.  744.11(b), the ERC determined that
one person, located in the Philippines, should be added to the Entity
List for actions contrary to the national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States. The ERC determined that there is
reasonable cause to believe, based on specific and articulable facts,
that Warren Sumaylo, has been involved in actions contrary to the
national security or foreign policy interests of the United States.
Specifically, in July 2014, Warren Sumaylo was indicted for exporting
weapon sights and rifle scopes to the Philippines in violation of the
EAR and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).
    Pursuant to Sec.  744.11(b) of the EAR, the ERC determined that the
conduct of these ten persons raises sufficient concern that prior
review of exports, reexports or transfers (in-country) of items subject
to the EAR involving these persons, and the possible imposition of
license conditions or license denials on shipments to the persons, will
enhance BIS's ability to prevent violations of the EAR. Therefore,
these ten persons are being added to the Entity List under fourteen
entries.
    For the ten persons under fourteen entries added to the Entity
List, BIS imposes a license requirement for all items subject to the
EAR and a license review policy of presumption of denial. The license
requirements apply to any transaction in which items are to be
exported, reexported, or transferred (in-country) to any of the persons
or in which such persons act as purchaser, intermediate consignee,
ultimate consignee, or end-user. In addition, no license exceptions are
available for exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country) to the
persons being added to the Entity List in this rule. The acronym
``a.k.a.'' (also known as) is used in entries on the Entity List to
help exporters, reexporters and transferors better identify listed
persons on the Entity List.
    This final rule adds the following ten persons under fourteen
entries to the Entity List:

Iraq

    (1) Abd Al Hakim Luqman Jasim Muhammad,
    Al Faysaliyah, Mosul, Iraq;
    (2) Ag Yildiz Insaat Gayrimenkul Tasimacilik Pazarlama lthalat
Ihracat ve Ticaret Ltd. Sirketi, a.k.a., the following four aliases:

--Ag Yildiz Cargo;
--Ag Yildiz Gayrimenkul;
--Yildiz Company; and
--Yildiz Shipping Company.

    Irbil, Iraq; and Mosul, Iraq (See alternate addresses under Syria
and Turkey); and
    (3) Sekirin Tekstil Ithalat Ihracat le ve Dis Ticaret Limited
Sirketi, a.k.a., the following seven aliases:

--Sekirin Textiles Export Import Limited Company;
--Al Shakirin International Transport Company;
--Shakirin Company;
--Shakrin Company;
--Sekirin Ticaret;
--Al Shakirin Company; and
--Sekirin Company.

    Al Faysaliyah, Mosul, Iraq (See alternate addresses under Syria and
Turkey).

Philippines

    (1) Warren Sumaylo,
    053 E Luna Street, Bgry Sikatuna, Butuan City, Philippines.

Syria

    (1) Ag Yildiz Insaat Gayrimenkul Tasimacilik Pazarlama lthalat
Ihracat ve Ticaret Ltd. Sirketi, a.k.a. the following four aliases:

--Ag Yildiz Cargo;
--Ag Yildiz Gayrimenkul;
--Yildiz Company; and
--Yildiz Shipping Company.

    Al Bab, Syria (See alternate addresses under Iraq and Turkey);
    (2) Jamal Jum'ah al-Shawi,
    Al Bab, Syria;
    (3) Muhammad `ulwan Al-Shawi,
    Al Bab, Syria; and
    (4) Sekirin Tekstil Ithalat Ihracat le ve Dis Ticaret Limited
Sirketi, a.k.a., the following seven aliases:

--Sekirin Textiles Export Import Limited Company;
--Al Shakirin International Transport Company;
--Shakirin Company;
--Shakrin Company;
--Sekirin Ticaret;
--Al Shakirin Company; and
--Sekirin Company.

    Al Bab, Syria (See alternate addresses under Iraq and Turkey).

Turkey

    (1) Ag Yildiz Insaat Gayrimenkul Tasimacilik Pazarlama lthalat
Ihracat ve Ticaret Ltd. Sirketi, a.k.a., the following four aliases:

--Ag Yildiz Cargo;
--Ag Yildiz Gayrimenkul;
--Yildiz Company; and
--Yildiz Shipping Company.

    Guneykent Mah. Universite Blv. Tuze Sitesi Alti No: 393/B,
Sahinbey, Gaziantep, Turkey (See alternate addresses under Iraq and
Syria);
    (2) Ala al-Shawi, a.k.a., the following one alias:

--Abu Cemal.

    60147 Caddesi No. 23, Sanayi Mahallesi, Sehitkamil, Gaziantep,
Turkey;
    (3) Ali Guzel,
    60147 Caddesi No. 23, Sanayi Mahallesi, Sehitkamil, Gaziantep,
Turkey;
    (4) Luqman Yasin Yunus Shgragi, a.k.a., the following two aliases:

--Lkemanasel Yosef; and
--Luqman Sehreci.

    Savcili Mahalesi Turkmenler Caddesi No:2, Sahinbey, Gaziantep,
Turkey; and Sanayi Mahalesi 60214 Nolu Caddesi No 11, SehitKamil,
Gaziantep, Turkey;
    (5) Sekirin Tekstil Ithalat Ihracat le ve Dis Ticaret Limited
Sirketi, a.k.a., the following seven aliases:

--Sekirin Textiles Export Import Limited Company;
--Al Shakirin International Transport Company;
--Shakirin Company;
--Shakrin Company;
--Sekirin Ticaret;
--Al Shakirin Company; and
--Sekirin Company.

    Savcili Mahalesi Turkmenler Caddesi No:2, Sahinbey, Gaziantep,
Turkey; and Sanayi Mahalesi 60214 Nolu Caddesi No 11, Sehit Kamil,
Gaziantep, Turkey (See alternate addresses under Iraq and Syria); and
    (6) Yunus Luqman Yasin Shgragi, a.k.a., the following one alias:

--Yunus Sehreci.

    Savcili Mahalesi Turkmenler Caddesi No: 2, Sahinbey, Gaziantep,
Turkey; and Sanayi Mahalesi 60214 Nolu Caddesi No 11, SehitKamil,
Gaziantep, Turkey.

Savings Clause

    Shipments of items removed from eligibility for a License Exception
or export or reexport without a license (NLR) as a result of this
regulatory action that were en route aboard a carrier to a port of
export or reexport, on August 23, 2016, pursuant to actual orders for
export or reexport to a foreign destination, may proceed to that
destination under the previous eligibility for a License Exception or
export or reexport without a license (NLR).

Export Administration Act

    Although the Export Administration Act expired on August 20, 2001,
the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR,
2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by Executive Order 13637 of March
8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and as extended by the Notice of
August 4, 2016, 81 FR 52587 (August 8, 2016), has continued the Export
Administration Regulations in effect under the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to carry out the provisions of the
Export Administration Act, as appropriate and to the extent permitted
by law, pursuant to Executive Order 13222, as amended by Executive
Order 13637.

Rulemaking Requirements

    1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
    2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to nor be subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with a collection of information, subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This regulation involves
collections previously approved by OMB under control number 0694-0088,
Simplified Network Application Processing System, which includes, among
other things, license applications and carries a burden estimate of
43.8 minutes for a manual or electronic submission. Total burden hours
associated with the PRA and OMB control number 0694-0088 are not
expected to increase as a result of this rule. You may send comments
regarding the collection of information associated with this rule,
including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Jasmeet K. Seehra,
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), by email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by fax to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined in Executive Order 13132.
    4. The provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) requiring notice of proposed rulemaking, the opportunity for
public comment and a delay in effective date are inapplicable to this
rule because this regulation involves a military or foreign affairs
function of the United States. (See 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). BIS implements
this rule to protect U.S. national security or foreign policy interests
by preventing items from being exported, reexported, or transferred (in
country) to the persons being added to the Entity List. If this rule
were delayed to allow for notice and comment and a delay in effective
date, the entities being added to the Entity List by this action would
continue to be able to receive items without a license and to conduct
activities contrary to the national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States. In addition, publishing a proposed rule
would give these parties notice of the U.S. Government's intention to
place them on the Entity List and would create an incentive for these
persons to either accelerate receiving items subject to the EAR to
conduct activities that are contrary to the national security or
foreign policy interests of the United States, and/or to take steps to
set up additional aliases, change addresses, and other measures to try
to limit the impact of the listing on the Entity List once a final rule
was published. Further, no other law requires that a notice of proposed
rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment be given for this
rule. Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment are not required to be given for this rule by 5 U.S.C.
553, or by any other law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly,
no regulatory flexibility analysis is required and none has been
prepared.

List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 744

    Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Terrorism.

    Accordingly, part 744 of the Export Administration Regulations (15
CFR parts 730 through 774) is amended as follows:

PART 744--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 744 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22
U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22
U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 179;
E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59
FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR,
1995 Comp., p. 356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222,
66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; Notice of September 18, 2015, 80 FR 57281
(September 22, 2015); Notice of November 12, 2015, 80 FR 70667
(November 13, 2015); Notice of January 20, 2016, 81 FR 3937 (January
22, 2016) ; Notice of August 4, 2016, 81 FR 52587 (August 8, 2016).

0
2. Supplement No. 4 to part 744 is amended:
0
a. By adding in alphabetical order, an entry for Iraq and three Iraqi
entities;
0
b. By adding in alphabetical order, an entry for Philippines and one
Filipino entity;
0
c. By adding under Syria, in alphabetical order, four Syrian entities;
and
0
d. By adding under Turkey, in alphabetical order, six Turkish entities.
The additions read as follows:

Supplement No. 4 to Part 744--Entity List

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             License         License review     Federal Register
        Country                     Entity                 requirement           policy             citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IRAQ...................  Abd Al Hakim Luqman Jasim     For all items       Presumption of      81 FR [INSERT FR
                          Muhammad, Al Faysaliyah,      subject to the      denial.             PAGE NUMBER], 08/
                          Mosul, Iraq.                  EAR. (See Sec.                          23/16.
                                                        744.11 of the
                                                        EAR).
                         Ag Yildiz Insaat Gayrimenkul  For all items       Presumption of      81 FR [INSERT FR
                          Tasimacilik Pazarlama         subject to the      denial.             PAGE NUMBER], 08/
                          lthalat Ihracat ve Ticaret    EAR. (See Sec.                          23/16.
                          Ltd. Sirketi, a.k.a. the      744.11 of the
                          following four aliases:       EAR).
                         --Ag Yildiz Cargo;
                         --Ag Yildiz Gayrimenkul;
                         --Yildiz Company; and
                         --Yildiz Shipping Company.
                         Irbil, Iraq; and Mosul, Iraq
                          (See alternate addresses
                          under Syria and Turkey).
                         Sekirin Tekstil Ithalat       For all items       Presumption of      81 FR [INSERT FR
                          Ihracat le ve Dis Ticaret     subject to the      denial.             PAGE NUMBER], 08/
                          Limited Sirketi, a.k.a.,      EAR. (See Sec.                          23/16.
                          the following seven           744.11 of the
                          aliases:                      EAR).
                         Sekirin Textiles Export
                          Import Limited Company;
                         --Al Shakirin International
                          Transport Company;
                         --Shakirin Company;
                         --Shakrin Company;
                         --Sekirin Ticaret;
                         --Al Shakirin Company; and
                         --Sekirin Company.            Al Faysaliyah,
                                                        Mosul, Iraq (See
                                                        alternate
                                                        addresses under
                                                        Syria and
                                                        Turkey).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHILIPPINES............  Warren Sumaylo, 053 E Luna    For all items       Presumption of      81 FR [INSERT FR
                          Street, Bgry Sikatuna,        subject to the      denial.             PAGE NUMBER], 08/
                          Butuan City, Philippines.     EAR. (See Sec.                          23/16.
                                                        744.11 of the
                                                        EAR).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SYRIA..................  Ag Yildiz Insaat Gayrimenkul  For all items       Presumption of      81 FR [INSERT FR
                          Tasimacilik Pazarlama         subject to the      denial.             PAGE NUMBER], 08/
                          lthalat Ihracat ve Ticaret    EAR. (See Sec.                          23/16.
                          Ltd. Sirketi, a.k.a., the     744.11 of the
                          following four aliases:       EAR).
                         --Ag Yildiz Cargo;
                         --Ag Yildiz Gayrimenkul;
                         --Yildiz Company; and
                         --Yildiz Shipping Company.
                         Al Bab, Syria (See alternate
                          addresses under Iraq and
                          Turkey).

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Jamal Jum'ah al-Shawi, Al     For all items       Presumption of      81 FR [INSERT FR
                          Bab, Syria.                   subject to the      denial.             PAGE NUMBER], 08/
                                                        EAR. (See Sec.                          23/16.
                                                        744.11 of the
                                                        EAR).

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Muhammad `ulwan Al-Shawi, Al  For all items       Presumption of      81 FR [INSERT FR
                          Bab, Syria                    subject to the      denial.             PAGE NUMBER], 08/
                                                        EAR. (See Sec.                          23/16.
                                                        744.11 of the
                                                        EAR).

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Sekirin Tekstil Ithalat       For all items       Presumption of      81 FR [INSERT FR
                          Ihracat le ve Dis Ticaret     subject to the      denial.             PAGE NUMBER], 08/
                          Limited Sirketi, a.k.a.,      EAR. (See Sec.                          23/16.
                          the following seven           744.11 of the
                          aliases:                      EAR).
                         --Sekirin Textiles Export
                          Import Limited Company;
                         --Al Shakirin International
                          Transport Company;
                         --Shakirin Company;
                         --Shakrin Company;
                         --Sekirin Ticaret;
                         --Al Shakirin Company; and
                         --Sekirin Company.            Al Bab, Syria (See
                                                        alternate
                                                        addresses under
                                                        Iraq and Turkey).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TURKEY.................  Ag Yildiz Insaat Gayrimenkul  For all items       Presumption of      81 FR [INSERT FR
                          Tasimacilik Pazarlama         subject to the      denial.             PAGE NUMBER], 08/
                          lthalat Ihracat ve Ticaret    EAR. (See Sec.                          23/16.
                          Ltd. Sirketi, a.k.a., the     744.11 of the
                          following four aliases:       EAR).
                         --Ag Yildiz Cargo;
                         --Ag Yildiz Gayrimenkul;
                         --Yildiz Company; and
                         --Yildiz Shipping Company.
                         Guneykent Mah. Universite
                          Blv. Tuze Sitesi Alti No:
                          393/B, Sahinbey, Gaziantep,
                          Turkey (See alternate
                          addresses under Iraq and
                          Syria).

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Ala al-Shawi, a.k.a., the     For all items       Presumption of      81 FR [INSERT FR
                          following one alias:          subject to the      denial.             PAGE NUMBER], 08/
                         --Abu Cemal.                   EAR. (See Sec.                          23/16.
                         60147 Caddesi No. 23, Sanayi   744.11 of the
                          Mahallesi, Sehitkamil,        EAR).
                          Gaziantep, Turkey.
                         Ali Guzel, 60147 Caddesi No.  For all items       Presumption of      81 FR [INSERT FR
                          23, Sanayi Mahallesi,         subject to the      denial.             PAGE NUMBER], 08/
                          Sehitkamil, Gaziantep,        EAR. (See Sec.                          23/16.
                          Turkey.                       744.11 of the
                                                        EAR).

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Luqman Yasin Yunus Shgragi,   For all items       Presumption of      81 FR [INSERT FR
                          a.k.a., the following two     subject to the      denial.             PAGE NUMBER], 08/
                          aliases:                      EAR. (See Sec.                          23/16.
                         --Lkemanasel Yosef; and        744.11 of the
                         --Luqman Sehreci.              EAR).
                         Savcili Mahalesi Turkmenler
                          Caddesi No:2, Sahinbey,
                          Gaziantep, Turkey; and
                         Sanayi Mahalesi 60214 Nolu
                          Caddesi No 11, SehitKamil,
                          Gaziantep, Turkey.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Sekirin Tekstil Ithalat       For all items       Presumption of      81 FR [INSERT FR
                          Ihracat le ve Dis Ticaret     subject to the      denial.             PAGE NUMBER], 08/
                          Limited Sirketi, a.k.a.,      EAR. (See Sec.                          23/16.
                          the following seven           744.11 of the
                          aliases:                      EAR).
                         --Sekirin Textiles Export
                          Import Limited Company;
                         --Al Shakirin International
                          Transport Company;
                         --Shakirin Company;
                         --Shakrin Company;
                         --Sekirin Ticaret;
                         --Al Shakirin Company; and
                         --Sekirin Company.
                         Savcili Mahalesi Turkmenler
                          Caddesi No:2, Sahinbey,
                          Gaziantep, Turkey; and
                         Sanayi Mahalesi 60214 Nolu
                          Caddesi No 11, Sehit Kamil,
                          Gaziantep, Turkey (See
                          alternate addresses under
                          Iraq and Syria).

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Yunus Luqman Yasin Shgragi,   For all items       Presumption of      81 FR [INSERT FR
                          a.k.a., the following one     subject to the      denial.             PAGE NUMBER], 08/
                          alias:                        EAR. (See Sec.                          23/16.
                         --Yunus Sehreci.               744.11 of the
                         Savcili Mahalesi Turkmenler    EAR).
                          Caddesi No: 2, Sahinbey,
                          Gaziantep, Turkey; and
                         Sanayi Mahalesi 60214 Nolu
                          Caddesi No 11, SehitKamil,
                          Gaziantep, Turkey.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: August 17, 2016.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-20142 Filed 8-22-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-33-P