[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 134 (Thursday, July 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32301-32302]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14934]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-2565]

Advisory Committee; Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee;
Renewal

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; renewal of advisory committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
renewal of the Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee by the
Commissioner of Food and Drugs (the Commissioner). The Commissioner has
determined that it is in the public interest to renew the
Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee for an additional 2 years
beyond the charter expiration date. The new charter will be in effect
until June 4, 2020.

DATES: Authority for the Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee
will expire on June 4, 2020, unless the Commissioner formally
determines that renewal is in the public interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kalyani Bhatt, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, Rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-9001, email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 41 CFR 102-3.65 and approval by
the Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to 45 CFR part 11
and by the General Services Administration, FDA is announcing the
renewal of the Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee (the
Committee). The Committee is a discretionary Federal advisory committee
established to provide advice to the Commissioner.
    The Committee advises the Commissioner or designee in discharging
responsibilities as they relate to helping to ensure safe and effective
drugs for human use and, as required, any other product for which FDA
has regulatory responsibility.
    The Committee reviews and evaluates data concerning the safety and
effectiveness of marketed and investigational human drug products for
use in the practice of psychiatry and related fields and makes
appropriate recommendations to the Commissioner.
    The Committee shall consist of a core of nine voting members
including the Chair. Members and the Chair are selected by the
Commissioner or designee from among authorities knowledgeable in the
fields of psychopharmacology, psychiatry, epidemiology or statistics,
and related specialties. Members will be invited to serve for
overlapping terms of up to 4 years. Almost all non-Federal members of
this committee serve as Special Government Employees. The core of
voting members may include one technically qualified member, selected
by the Commissioner or designee, who is identified with consumer
interests and is recommended by either a consortium of consumer-
oriented organizations or other interested persons. In addition to the
voting members, the Committee may include one non-voting member who is
identified with industry interests.
    Further information regarding the most recent charter and other
information can be found at https://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/PsychopharmacologicDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/default.htm or by contacting
the Designated Federal Officer (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
In light of the fact that no change has been made to the committee name
or description of duties, no amendment will be made to 21 CFR 14.100.
    This document is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app.). For general information related to FDA advisory
committees, please check https://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm.

    Dated: July 9, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-14934 Filed 7-11-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 96 (Thursday, May 17, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29212-29214]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11463]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0105; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-123-AD;
Amendment 39-17049; AD 2012-09-14]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports
of fractured and missing latch pin retention bolts that secure the
latch pins on the forward cargo door. This AD requires repetitive
detailed inspections for fractured or missing latch pin retention
bolts, replacement of existing titanium bolts with new Inconel bolts,
and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct fractured and missing latch pin
retention bolts, which could result in potential separation of the
cargo door from the airplane and catastrophic decompression of the
airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective June 21, 2012.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of June 21,
2012.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet https:[sol][sol]www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies
of the referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address
for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ana Martinez Hueto, Aerospace
Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM published in the Federal Register on February 8, 2012 (77 FR

6522). That NPRM proposed to require repetitive detailed inspections
for fractured or missing latch pin retention bolts, replacement of
existing titanium bolts with new Inconel bolts, and related
investigative and corrective actions if necessary.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We have considered the comments received. Boeing and American
Airlines support the NPRM (77 FR 6522, February 8, 2012).

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD as proposed.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 148 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
              Action                        Labor cost            Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection........................  1 work-hour x $85 per                  $0              $85          $12,580
                                     hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs that
would be required based on the results of the inspection. We have no
way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these
repairs:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                Action                                Labor cost                   Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross-bolt replacement...............  2 work-hours x $85 per hour = $170.....             $50             $220
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2012-09-14 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17049; Docket No. FAA-
2012-0105; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-123-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective June 21, 2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200, -200LR, -
300, -300ER, and 777F series airplanes; certificated in any
category; as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
52A0038, Revision 1, dated June 24, 2010.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 52, Doors.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of fractured and missing latch
pin retention bolts that secure the latch pins on the forward cargo
door. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fractured and
missing latch pin retention bolts, which could result in potential
separation of the cargo door from the airplane and catastrophic
decompression of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspect Retention Bolt of Latch Pin Fittings No. 1 Through No. 8

    At the applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-52A0038,
Revision 1, dated June 24, 2010, except as specified in paragraph
(i) of this AD: Do a detailed inspection for fractured and/or

missing latch pin retention bolts of the latch pin fittings of the
lower sill of the forward large cargo door, and do all applicable
related investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
52A0038, Revision 1, dated June 24, 2010, except as provided by
paragraph (h) of this AD. Do all applicable related investigative
and corrective actions at the applicable times specified in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
777-52A0038, Revision 1, dated June 24, 2010. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-52A0038,
Revision 1, dated June 24, 2010, except as specified in paragraph
(j) of this AD.

(h) Repair

    If any cut, crack, or damage is found during any inspection
required by this AD, and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-52A0038,
Revision 1, dated June 24, 2010, specifies to contact Boeing for
appropriate action: Before further flight, repair the cut, crack, or
damage in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Seattle,
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA. For a repair method to be
approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.

(i) Exception to Compliance Time

    Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-52A0038, Revision 1,
dated June 24, 2010, specifies a compliance time after the date on
that service bulletin, this AD requires compliance within the
specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD.

(j) Optional Terminating Action for Repetitive Inspections

    Replacing latch pin retention bolts made of titanium with new
Inconel bolts, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-52A0038, Revision 1, dated June
24, 2010, terminates the repetitive inspections required by
paragraph (g) of this AD at Stations 509.10, 522.75, 537.50, 554.30,
562.90, 579.70, 591.25, and 604.90, latch pin fittings No. 1 through
No. 8.

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD. Information may be emailed
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(l) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Ana Martinez Hueto,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch,
ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 425-
917-6590; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) You must use the following service information to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference (IBR) of the following service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 of the following service information:
    (i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-52A0038, Revision 1, dated
June 24, 2010.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 4, 2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-11463 Filed 5-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 29, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 210)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64213-64215]
[DOCID:fr29oc08-14]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2008-0198; FRL-8722-9]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Illinois

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a request submitted by the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) on January 24, 2008, to revise
the Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP) for volatile organic
compounds (VOC). The approval revises the Illinois SIP by updating
information regarding the packaging production facility of Cromwell-
Phoenix, Incorporated, located in Alsip, Illinois. It acknowledges that
the source has changed its name from Cromwell-Phoenix, Incorporated, to
CP-D Acquisition Company, LLC, as a consequence of a change in
ownership. The revision does not change any of the VOC control
requirements and will not increase VOC emissions because no emission
limits were increased.

DATES: This rule is effective on December 29, 2008, unless EPA receives
adverse written comments by November 28, 2008. If EPA receives adverse
comments, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take
effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2008-0198 by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: John Mooney, Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
     Hand Delivery: John Mooney, Chief, Criteria Pollutant
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information. The Regional Office official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal
holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2008-0198. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless

the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or
otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through http://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This Facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. We recommend that you telephone Charles Hatten, Environmental
Engineer, at<PHONE_NUMBER> before visiting the Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Hatten, Environmental
Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. General Information
    A. Does this action apply to me?
II. What revision did the State request be incorporated into the
SIP?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action only applies to the CP-D Acquisition Company, LLC,
packaging production facility located in Alsip, Illinois (Cook County).

II. What revision did the State request be incorporated into the SIP?

    The State has requested that EPA approve as a revision to the
Illinois SIP the change in the source name from Cromwell-Phoenix, Inc.
(Cromwell), to CP-D Acquisition Company, LLC (CP-D Acquisition).

Background

    On September 18, 2003, the Opinion and Order of the Illinois
Pollution Control Board (IPCB), AS 03-05, adopted the amendments to the
paper coating rules in 35 Illinois Administrative Code (IAC) 218.204(c)
for Cromwell's Alsip packaging production facility, subject to
conditions and alternate requirements for this facility. The IEPA held
a public hearing on this SIP amendment on August 7, 2003.
    At the time the IPCB issued this Order, Cromwell was going through
a name change. On November 7, 2003, Cromwell and CP-D Acquisition filed
a joint motion to re-open Opinion and Order, AS 03-05, which granted
Cromwell an adjusted standard from 35 IAC 218.204(c). Because the
assets and ownership would not change, the IPCB re-opened the docket to
re-issue the Opinion and Order, AS 03-05, granting the adjusted
standard in the name of CP-D Acquisition. Therefore, under the Opinion
and Order, AS 03-05, adopted on November 20, 2003, the IPCB transferred
all of the requirements applicable to the operating assets of Cromwell
to CP-D Acquisition. The revision does not change any of the control
requirements and will not increase VOC emissions because no emission
limits were increased relative to the adjusted standard approved by the
EPA on December 13, 2007, and relative to other applicable VOC emission
limits contained in the Illinois SIP. See 72 FR 70804, dated December
13, 2007.
    The revision to the Illinois SIP is solely an administrative change
to reference the new name of the packaging production facility from
Cromwell to CP-D Acquisition Company, LLC.

III. What action is EPA taking?

    We are approving a revision to the Illinois SIP to change the
source name of the packaging production facility from Cromwell-Phoenix,
Incorporated, to CP-D Acquisition Company, LLC.
    We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we
view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the state plan if relevant adverse
written comments are filed. This rule will be effective December 29,
2008 without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written
comments by November 28, 2008. If we receive such comments, we will
withdraw this action before the effective date by publishing a
subsequent document that will withdraw the final action. All public
comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed action. The EPA will not institute a second
comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time. If we do not receive any comments, this
action will be effective December 29, 2008.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 29, 2008. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: September 16, 2008.
Walter W. Kovalick, Jr,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, part 52, chapter I, of title 40
of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart O--Illinois

0
2. Section 52.720 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(183) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.720  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (183) On January 24, 2008, the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency submitted a revision to its state implementation plan for the
packaging production facility of CP-D Acquisition Company, LLC. The
revision changes the source name from Cromwell-Phoenix, Incorporated,
to CP-D Acquisition Company, LLC.
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) November 20, 2003, Supplemental Opinion and Order of the
Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS 03-05, effective November 20,
2003.

[FR Doc. E8-25657 Filed 10-28-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: June 28, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 123)]
[Notices]
[Page 36772-36773]
[DOCID:fr28jn10-146]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary of Transportation

[DOT Docket No. DOT-OST-2010-0074]

Future of Aviation Advisory Committee (FAAC)

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary of
Transportation.

ACTION: The Future of Aviation Advisory Committee (FAAC); Notice of
Federal Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary of
Transportation, announces the second meeting of the FAAC which will be
held in the Atlanta area. This notice announces the date, time and
location of the meeting, which will be open to the public. The purpose
of FAAC is to provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of
Transportation to ensure the competitiveness of the U.S. aviation
industry and its capability to manage effectively the evolving
transportation needs, challenges, and opportunities of the global
economy.

DATES: The meeting will be held on July 14, 2010, from 9 a.m. to 3:30
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the offices of the Federal
Aviation Administration's Southern Region Headquarters Building, 1701
Columbia Ave., College Park, GA 30337, in the Wright Brothers
Auditorium.
    Agenda: Time will be apportioned to each of the five Subcommittees
to present their findings to the Committee. The public will also be
afforded time to comment on the subcommittee report-outs. Persons
wishing to express more detailed comments are encouraged to do so in
written form (see instructions in the Public Comments section.) The
Committee and the public will also have an opportunity to discuss the
new proposed rulemaking titled ``Enhancing Airline Passenger
Protections'' (docket DOT-OST-2010-0140.)
    Public Access: The meeting is open to the public. (See below for
registration instructions.) Entering the FAA Building:
     A valid form of government issued ID with an expiration
date is required.
     Registration is from 7:30 to 8:45 a.m.
     Only pre-registered attendees may attend the meeting.
     Attendees must be screened and pass through a metal
detector.
     No firearms are allowed in the building.
     Special accessibility requirements should be noted at time
of email registration.
     There is no publicly available Internet access at this
site.
     A cafeteria is available on-site for lunch (cash only).
     There is limited parking available at the site. Those
wishing to utilize the FAA parking facility should note that fact in
the registration request. Visitors using FAA parking should use the
building entrance at 1712 Princeton Ave., College Park, GA 30337.
     Those using public transportation may use the Columbia
Avenue entrance which is 2 blocks East of the College Park Station on
the Red and Gold Lines of MARTA (Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit
Authority). See http://www.itsmarta.com for more information on trip
planning.
    Public Comments: The public will be afforded an opportunity for
brief comments at the meeting. Comments should address one or more of
the five topics (competition, environment, finance, safety and
workforce/labor) that were published in the Federal Advisory Committee
Charter at http://www.regulations.gov (Docket DOT-OST-2010-0074). You
may also file written comments identified by the docket number DOT-OST-
2010-0074 by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: go to http://
www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Room W12-140, Washington, DC
20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    In addition to sending your comments through the dockets using any
of the methods above, you may also forward a copy of your comments and
questions to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and include one of the following in the
subject line when making your email submission; ``Financing'',
``Safety'', ``Environment'', ``Workforce'', ``Competition'', and/or
``General comment''.
    In order for the committee to read and consider your views for the
July 14 meeting, comments must be received by 5 p.m. EDT Monday, July
12. All public comments will be posted in Docket DOT-OST-2010-0074,
which is accessible from http://www.Regulations.gov. Please note that
even after the closing date, we will continue to review public comments
for future meetings.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    To carry out its duties, the advisory committee met on May 25, 2010
in Washington, DC. At that meeting it was determined that issues would
be identified and explored further in subcommittees. The Advisory
Committee will meet on the following dates this year:

     July 14
     August 25
     October 20
     December 15

    Members of the public may review the FAAC charter and minutes of
FAAC meetings at http://www.regulations.gov in docket number DOT-OST-
2010-0074 or the FAAC Web site at http://www.dot.gov/faac.

Registration

     Space is limited. Registration will be available on a
first-come, first-serve basis. Once the maximum number of 300
registrants has been reached, registration will close. All requests to
attend the FAAC must be received by close of business on Monday, July
12.
     All foreign nationals must provide their date of birth and
passport number by Wednesday, June 30.
     Persons with disabilities who require special assistance
should advise the Department at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>under the subject line of
``Special Assistance'' of their anticipated special needs as early as
possible.
     To register: Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>under the
subject line ``Registration'' with the following information:

    [cir] Last name, First name

    [cir] Title (if any)
    [cir] Company or affiliation (if any)
    [cir] Address
    [cir] Phone number
    [cir] US Citizen (Y/N)
    [cir] Requesting use of the FAA parking facility or using Public
Transportation
    [cir] Email address in order for us to confirm your registration

     The Federal Aviation Administration building is a secure
Federal facility.
     An e-mail will be sent to you confirming your registration
along with details on security procedures for entering the Federal
Aviation Administration building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela Hamilton-Powell, Designated
Federal Officer, Future of Aviation Advisory Committee,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Issued on: June 21, 2010.
Ray LaHood,
Secretary of Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2010-15582 Filed 6-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8884-8886]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03120]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2020-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2009]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS
report, once effective, will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before May 18, 2020.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location https://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata and the
respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS

report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2009, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and are used to calculate the appropriate
flood insurance premium rates for new buildings built after the FIRM
and FIS report become effective.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location
https://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata and the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities
with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be
identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date
listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Mason County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)
         Project: 13-05-4235S Preliminary Date: August 26, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charter Township of Pere Marquette.....  Pere Marquette Charter Township
                                          Hall, 1699 South Pere
                                          Marquette Highway, Ludington,
                                          MI 49431.
City of Ludington......................  City Hall, 400 South Harrison
                                          Street, Ludington, MI 49431.
Township of Grant......................  Grant Township Hall, 843 West
                                          Hoague Road, Manistee, MI
                                          49660.
Township of Hamlin.....................  Hamlin Township Hall, 3775
                                          North Jebavy Drive, Ludington,
                                          MI 49431.
Township of Summit.....................  Summit Township Hall, 4879 West
                                          Deren Road, Ludington, MI
                                          49431.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Oceana County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)
         Project: 13-05-4234S Preliminary Date: August 26, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Township of Benona.....................  Benona Township Hall, 7169 West
                                          Baker Road, Shelby, MI 49455.
Township of Claybanks..................  Claybanks Township Hall, 7577
                                          West Cleveland Road, New Era,
                                          MI 49446.
Township of Golden.....................  Golden Township Hall, 5527 West
                                          Fox Road, Mears, MI 49436.
Township of Pentwater..................  Township Office, 327 South
                                          Hancock Street, Pentwater, MI
                                          49449.
Township of Weare......................  Weare Township Hall, 6506 North
                                          Oceana Drive, Hart, MI 49420.
Village of Pentwater...................  Village Office, 327 South
                                          Hancock Street, Pentwater, MI
                                          49449.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Sanilac County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)
        Project: 14-05-2727S Preliminary Date: September 13, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Township of Delaware...................  Delaware Township Hall, 7979
                                          Maple Grove Road, Minden City,
                                          MI 48456.
Township of Forester...................  Forester Township Hall, 2470
                                          North Lakeshore Road (M-25),
                                          Deckerville, MI 48427.
Township of Lexington..................  Township Hall, 7227 Huron
                                          Avenue, Suite 200, Lexington,
                                          MI 48450.
Township of Sanilac....................  Township Hall, 20 North Ridge
                                          Street, Port Sanilac, MI
                                          48469.
Township of Worth......................  Worth Township Hall, 6903 South
                                          Lakeshore Road, Lexington, MI
                                          48450.
Village of Forestville.................  Village Hall, 5605 Cedar
                                          Street, Forestville, MI 48434.

Village of Lexington...................  Village Hall, 7227 Huron
                                          Avenue, Suite 100, Lexington,
                                          MI 48450.
Village of Port Sanilac................  Village Hall, 56 North Ridge
                                          Street, Port Sanilac, MI
                                          48469.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2020-03120 Filed 2-14-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


                 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY
                             2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE
                           ANN ARBOR, MI  48105-2498

									     OFFICE OF
									AIR AND RADIATION
January 3, 2022

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Proposed Changes to Aircraft Engine Emissions Reporting Template

FROM: 	G. Cullen Leggett, Aerospace Engineer
	Assessment and Standards Division
	Office of Transport and Air Quality
	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

TO:	Information Collection Request; Aircraft Engine Supplemental Information Related to Exhaust Emissions (Renewal)
	Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0546

This memo documents proposed changes to the Aircraft Engine Emissions Reporting Template (EPA Form Number: 5900-223).  These changes include the clarification of production volumes and changing emissions mass to emissions index as proposed in the ICR.

Attachments:
EPA_Form-5900-223-reporting_template_aircraft-Proposed_Revision_v4.xlsx


MEMORANDUM TO: 3848.141 file FROM: Craig Simons, DPRA DATE: September 9, 1999 SUBJ: Record of communication with Con Walker, Inco Ltd. (416 361 7801)

I called regarding some of our assumptions in the F006 analysis and left a message. Con returned my call and was very willing to talk.

I asked about the reality of our assumption regarding the minimum charge per load of $1350 (noting the basis for the cost). In short this is not the way they operate– but they generally have full loads and do not do very much recycling. The flash furnace they have at Coppercliff is very finicky and does not take variable feedstocks. The roaster at the Thompson facility is more amenable but they are operating at capacity with virgin materials. They do have a corporate philosophy to accept the nickel waste, but tend to work more with the reprocessors (he named World Resources and CA IBR). In taking shipments from these operations they have specs and tonnage specified and do not have a charge (I do not believe it is an issue– they get full loads, primarily).

They are the second largest nickel operation– second only to Russia (he may have been speaking about Canada rather than their operations??). He said their own corporate image is a nickel mining smelting refining and marketing company.

He noted that back a few years they dealt with a Michigan generator– American Bumper– and fished around for the old contract. In the contract it specified that they would pay American Bumper based on 90% of the assay value of the nickel and copper (they base contracts on the assumption that they only recover 90% of the targeted metals– in fact it is well higher that 90%, and this volume of metal is valued based on monthly average LME prices). They would charge American Bumper $130 per dry ton for smelting, and $1/ lb for refining the accountable (90% of assay) nickel and $0.22/ lb for refining copper. I did not get info on the typical nickel and copper content of the F006. (In short he thought our assumption of $200 to $400 per ton for recycling was accurate– but he did not realize that our estimates were net of the assay metal value. In other words it appears that our assumptions of the metal recycling cost– at least according to Inco, are too high).

In their contracts they also have penalties for higher than expected "problem" metals– such as cadmium– chromium– selenium– lead.. At their Coppercliff facility they use less than 1% custom feedstock (recycled material). At Thompson they use slightly more. He noted that at Falconbridge– a subsidiary, they use about 10% custom feedstock, and an even higher percentage at Noranda.

He noted that because of some of their operational quirks, they cause problems for individual generators. For instance in cold weather the flash furnace is even less tolerant of the custom feedstocks– and in these periods they could not accept F006 from American Bumper. He noted that they do not stockpile feedstock materials. He did think that the longer waste accumulation period would be a benefit and would actually increase recycling.


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 84 (Monday, May 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26265-26269]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10146]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-77705; File No. SR-Nasdaq-2016-002]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order
Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto, To List
and Trade Shares of the First Trust Municipal High Income ETF of First
Trust Exchange-Traded Fund III

April 26, 2016.

I. Introduction

    On January 6, 2016, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'' or ``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to list and trade shares
(``Shares'') of the First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (``Fund'')
under Nasdaq Rule 5735. The proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on January 27, 2016.\3\ On February 16,
2016, the

Exchange filed Amendment No. 1.\4\ On March 8, 2016, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\5\ the Commission designated a longer
period within which to approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove the proposed rule change.\6\ The Commission received no
comments on the proposed rule change. This order institutes proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \7\ to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1 thereto.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76944 (Jan. 21,
2016), 81 FR 4712 (``Notice'').
    \4\ In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange clarified that the Fund's
portfolio will satisfy the following quantitative standards set
forth NASDAQ 5705(b)(4)(A) except for those in Nasdaq Rule
5705(b)(4)(A)(ii): (i) The index or portfolio must consist of Fixed
Income Securities; (ii) Components that in aggregate account for at
least 75% of the weight of the index or portfolio must have a
minimum original principal amount outstanding of $100 million or
more; (iii) A component may be a convertible security, however, once
the convertible security component converts to an underlying equity
security, the component is removed from the index or portfolio; (iv)
No component fixed-income security (excluding Treasury Securities)
will represent more than 30% of the weight of the index or
portfolio, and the five highest weighted component fixed-income
securities do not in the aggregate account for more than 65% of the
weight of the index or portfolio; (v) An underlying index or
portfolio (excluding exempted securities) must include securities
from a minimum of 13 non-affiliated issuers; and (vi) Component
securities that in aggregate account for at least 90% of the weight
of the index or portfolio must be either: (a) From issuers that are
required to file reports pursuant to Sections 13 and 15(d) of the
Act; (b) from issuers that have a worldwide market value of its
outstanding common equity held by non-affiliates of $700 million or
more; (c) from issuers that have outstanding securities that are
notes, bonds, debentures, or evidence of indebtedness having a total
remaining principal amount of at least $1 billion; (d) exempted
securities as defined in section 3(a)(12) of the Act; or (e) from
issuers that are a government of a foreign country or a political
subdivision of a foreign country. Because Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change is technical in nature and does not materially
alter the substance of the proposed rule change or raise any novel
regulatory issues, it is not subject to notice and comment.
Amendment No. 1 is available on the Commission's Web site at: http://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nasdaq-2016-002/nasdaq2016002-1.pdf.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-77320, 81 FR
13429 (Mar. 14, 2016). The Commission designated April 26, 2016 as
the date by which the Commission shall either approve or disapprove,
or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the
proposed rule change.
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    Nasdaq proposes to list and trade Shares of the Fund under Nasdaq
Rule 5735, which governs the listing and trading of Managed Fund Shares
on the Exchange. The Shares will be offered by the First Trust
Exchange-Traded Fund III (``Trust''), a Massachusetts business trust
registered with the Commission as an open-end investment company.\8\
First Trust Advisors L.P. will be the investment manager to the Fund
(``Adviser''),\9\ and First Trust Portfolios L.P. will serve as the
principal underwriter and distributor for the Fund. Brown Brothers
Harriman & Co. will act as the administrator, accounting agent,
custodian and transfer agent to the Fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The Trust is registered with the Commission as an investment
company and has filed a registration statement on Form N-1A
(``Registration Statement'') with the Commission. See Post-Effective
Amendment No. 27 to Registration Statement on Form N-1A for the
Trust, dated August 31, 2015 (File Nos. 333-176976 and 811-22245).
In addition, the Exchange represents that the Commission has issued
an order, upon which the Trust may rely, granting certain exemptive
relief under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``1940 Act''). See
Investment Company Act Release No. 30029 (April 10, 2012) (File No.
812-13795).
    \9\ The Exchange represents that the Adviser is not a broker-
dealer, but it is affiliated with the Distributor, a broker-dealer,
and has implemented a fire wall with respect to its broker-dealer
affiliate regarding access to information concerning the composition
of or changes to the portfolio. The Exchange further represents that
personnel who make decisions on the Fund's portfolio composition
will be subject to procedures designed to prevent the use and
dissemination of material non-public information regarding the
Fund's portfolio. In the event (a) the Adviser or any sub-adviser
registers as a broker-dealer or becomes newly affiliated with a
broker-dealer, or (b) any new adviser or sub-adviser is a registered
broker-dealer or becomes affiliated with another broker-dealer, the
adviser or sub-adviser will implement a fire wall with respect to
its relevant personnel and/or such broker-dealer affiliate, as
applicable, regarding access to information concerning the
composition of and changes to the portfolio and will be subject to
procedures designed to prevent the use and dissemination of material
non-public information regarding such portfolio. See Notice, supra
note 3, at 4713.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has made the following representations and statements
in describing the Fund and its investment strategy, including other
portfolio holdings and investment restrictions.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The Commission notes that additional information regarding
the Fund, the Trust, and the Shares, including investment
strategies, risks, creation and redemption procedures, fees,
portfolio holdings disclosure policies, calculation of net asset
value (``NAV''), distributions, and taxes, among other things, can
be found in the Notice and the Registration Statement, as
applicable. See Notice and Registration Statement, supra notes 3 and
5, respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Principal Investments of the Fund

    The primary investment objective of the Fund will be to generate
current income that is exempt from regular federal income taxes, and
its secondary objective will be long-term capital appreciation. Under
normal market conditions,\11\ the Fund will seek to achieve its
investment objectives by investing at least 80% of its net assets
(including investment borrowings) in Municipal Securities.\12\
Municipal Securities are generally issued by or on behalf of states,
territories or possessions of the U.S. and the District of Columbia and
their political subdivisions, agencies, authorities and other
instrumentalities. The types of Municipal Securities in which the Fund
may invest include municipal lease obligations (and certificates of
participation in such obligations), municipal general obligation bonds,
municipal revenue bonds, municipal notes, municipal cash equivalents,
private activity bonds (including without limitation industrial
development bonds), and pre-refunded and escrowed to maturity bonds. In
addition, Municipal Securities include securities issued by entities
whose underlying assets are municipal bonds (i.e., tender option bond
(TOB) trusts and custodial receipts trusts). The Fund may invest in
Municipal Securities of any maturity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The term ``under normal market conditions'' as used herein
includes, but is not limited to, the absence of adverse market,
economic, political or other conditions, including extreme
volatility or trading halts in the fixed income markets or the
financial markets generally; operational issues causing
dissemination of inaccurate market information; or force majeure
type events such as systems failure, natural or man-made disaster,
act of God, armed conflict, act of terrorism, riot or labor
disruption or any similar intervening circumstance. On a temporary
basis, including for defensive purposes, during the initial invest-
up period and during periods of high cash inflows or outflows, the
Fund may depart from its principal investment strategies; for
example, it may hold a higher than normal proportion of its assets
in cash. During such periods, the Fund may not be able to achieve
its investment objectives. The Fund may adopt a defensive strategy
when the Adviser believes securities in which the Fund normally
invests have elevated risks due to political or economic factors and
in other extraordinary circumstances.
    \12\ According to the Exchange, the Fund may invest up to 100%
of its net assets in Municipal Securities that pay interest that
generates income subject to the federal alternative minimum tax,
assuming compliance with the investment requirements and limitations
described herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under normal market conditions, the Fund will invest at least 65%
of its net assets in Municipal Securities that are, at the time of
investment, rated below investment grade (i.e., not rated Baa3/BBB-- or
above) by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating
organization (``NRSRO'') rating such securities (or Municipal
Securities that are unrated and determined by the Adviser to be of
comparable quality) \13\

(commonly referred to as ``high yield'' or ``junk'' bonds); \14\
however, the Fund will consider pre-refunded or escrowed to maturity
bonds, regardless of rating, to be investment grade securities. The
Fund may invest up to 35% of its net assets in Municipal Securities
that are, at the time of investment, rated investment grade (i.e.,
rated Baa3/BBB--or above) by each NRSRO rating such securities (or
Municipal Securities that are unrated and determined by the Adviser to
be of comparable quality). If, subsequent to purchase by the Fund, a
Municipal Security held by the Fund experiences an improvement in
credit quality and becomes investment grade, the Fund may continue to
hold the Municipal Security and it will not cause the Fund to violate
the 35% investment limitation; however, the Municipal Security will be
taken into account for purposes of determining whether purchases of
additional Municipal Securities will cause the Fund to violate such
limitation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Comparable quality of unrated Municipal Securities will be
determined by the Adviser based on fundamental credit analysis of
the unrated security and comparable rated securities. On a best
efforts basis, the Adviser will attempt to make a rating
determination based on publicly available data. In making a
``comparable quality'' determination, the Adviser may consider, for
example, whether the issuer of the security has issued other rated
securities, the nature and provisions of the relevant security,
whether the obligations under the relevant security are guaranteed
by another entity and the rating of such guarantor (if any),
relevant cash flows, macroeconomic analysis, and/or sector or
industry analysis.
    \14\ The Municipal Securities in which the Fund will invest to
satisfy this 65% investment requirement may include Municipal
Securities that are currently in default and not expected to pay the
current coupon (``Distressed Municipal Securities''). The Fund may
invest up to 10% of its net assets in Distressed Municipal
Securities. If, subsequent to purchase by the Fund, a Municipal
Security held by the Fund becomes a Distressed Municipal Security,
the Fund may continue to hold the Distressed Municipal Security and
it will not cause the Fund to violate the 10% limitation; however,
the Distressed Municipal Security will be taken into account for
purposes of determining whether purchases of additional Municipal
Securities will cause the Fund to violate such limitation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Other (Non-Principal) Investments of the Fund

    The Exchange represents that the non-principal investments listed
below would consist of investments that are not included in the Fund's
80% Policy. Such assets may be invested in the Fixed Income Instruments
and other instruments, as described below.
    Under normal market conditions, the Fund will invest substantially
all of its assets to meet its investment objectives as described above.
In addition, the Fund may invest its assets or hold cash as generally
described below.
    The Exchange represents that the Fund may invest up to 10% of its
net assets in taxable municipal securities. The Fund may also invest up
to 10% of its net assets in short-term debt instruments,\15\ money
market funds, and other cash equivalents, or it may hold cash. The
percentage of the Fund invested in such holdings or held in cash will
vary and will depend on several factors, including market conditions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Short-term debt instruments, which do not include Municipal
Securities, are issued by issuers having a long-term debt rating of
at least A-/A3 (as applicable) by Standard & Poor's Ratings Services
(``S&P Ratings''), Moody's Investors Service, Inc. (``Moody's'') or
Fitch Ratings (``Fitch'') and have a maturity of one year or less.
According to the Exchange, the Fund may invest in the following
short-term debt instruments: (1) Fixed rate and floating rate U.S.
government securities, including bills, notes, and bonds differing
as to maturity and rates of interest, which are either issued or
guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury or by U.S. government agencies or
instrumentalities; (2) certificates of deposit issued against funds
deposited in a bank or savings and loan association; (3) bankers'
acceptances, which are short-term credit instruments used to finance
commercial transactions; (4) repurchase agreements, which involve
purchases of debt securities; (5) bank time deposits, which are
monies kept on deposit with banks or savings and loan associations
for a stated period of time at a fixed rate of interest; and (6)
commercial paper (rated A-3 or higher by S&P Ratings, Prime-3 or
higher by Moody's or F3 or higher by Fitch), which is short-term
unsecured promissory notes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to up to 20% of its net assets, the Fund may (i)
invest in the securities of other investment companies registered under
the 1940 Act, including money market funds, other ETFs, open-end funds
(other than money market funds and other ETFs), and closed-end funds
and (ii) acquire short positions in the securities of the foregoing
investment companies.
    With respect to up to 20% of its net assets, the Fund may (i)
invest in exchange-listed options on U.S. Treasury securities,
exchange-listed options on U.S. Treasury futures contracts, and
exchange-listed U.S. Treasury futures contracts and (ii) acquire short
positions in the foregoing derivatives. Transactions in the foregoing
derivatives may allow the Fund to obtain net long or short exposures to
selected interest rates. These derivatives may also be used to hedge
risks, including interest rate risks and credit risks, associated with
the Fund's portfolio investments. The Fund's investments in derivative
instruments will be consistent with the Fund's investment objectives
and the 1940 Act and will not be used to seek to achieve a multiple or
inverse multiple of an index.

C. Investment Restrictions

    The Exchange represents that the Fund may hold up to an aggregate
amount of 15% of its net assets in illiquid assets (calculated at the
time of investment), including Rule 144A securities deemed illiquid by
the Adviser.\16\ The Exchange further represents that the Fund will
monitor its portfolio liquidity on an ongoing basis to determine
whether, in light of current circumstances, an adequate level of
liquidity is being maintained, and will consider taking appropriate
steps in order to maintain adequate liquidity if, through a change in
values, net assets, or other circumstances, more than 15% of the Fund's
net assets are held in illiquid assets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ In reaching liquidity decisions, the Adviser may consider
the following factors: The frequency of trades and quotes for the
security; the number of dealers wishing to purchase or sell the
security and the number of other potential purchasers; dealer
undertakings to make a market in the security; and the nature of the
security and the nature of the marketplace in which it trades (e.g.,
the time needed to dispose of the security, the method of soliciting
offers and the mechanics of transfer).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Fund may not invest 25% or more of the value of its total
assets in securities of issuers in any one industry, although this
restriction does not apply to (a) Municipal Securities issued by
governments or political subdivisions of governments, (b) obligations
issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or
instrumentalities, or (c) securities of other investment companies.

D. Nasdaq Rule 5705(b)(4)(A)

    The Fund will be actively managed and will not be tied to an index.
Under normal market conditions, on a continuous basis determined at the
time of purchase, its portfolio of Municipal Securities \17\ will
generally meet, as applicable, all criteria for non-actively managed,
index-based, fixed income ETFs contained in Nasdaq Rule 5705(b)(4)(A)
except for those set forth in Nasdaq Rule 5705(b)(4)(A)(ii), which
requires that components that in the aggregate account for at least 75%
of the weight of the index or portfolio have a minimum original
principal amount outstanding of $100 million or more. However, under
normal market conditions, at least 40% (based on dollar amount
invested) of the Municipal Securities in which the Fund invests will be
issued by issuers with total outstanding debt issuances that, in the
aggregate, have a minimum original principal amount outstanding of $75
million or more, which according to the Exchange, should provide
support regarding the anticipated liquidity of the Fund's Municipal
Securities portfolio.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ According to the Exchange, for purposes of this statement
and the discussion of the requirements of Nasdaq Rule 5705(b)(4)(A),
with respect to Municipal Securities that are issued by entities
whose underlying assets are municipal bonds, the underlying
municipal bonds, rather than the securities issued by such entities,
will be taken into account.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove SR-
Nasdaq-2016-002 and Grounds for Disapproval Under Consideration

    The Commission is instituting proceedings pursuant to Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \18\ to determine whether the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No. 1 thereto, should be approved or
disapproved. Institution of such proceedings is appropriate at this
time in view of the legal and policy issues raised by the proposed rule
change. Institution of proceedings does not indicate that the
Commission has reached any conclusions with respect to any of the
issues involved. Rather, as described below, the Commission seeks and
encourages interested persons to provide comments on the proposed rule
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act,\19\ the Commission is
providing notice of the grounds for disapproval under consideration.
The Commission is instituting proceedings to allow for additional
analysis of the proposed rule change's consistency with Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act, which requires, among other things, that the rules of a
national securities exchange be ``designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade,'' and ``to protect investors and the public
interest.'' \20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Id.
    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Procedure: Request for Written Comments

    The Commission requests that interested persons provide written
submissions of their views, data, and arguments with respect to the
issues identified above, as well as any other concerns they may have
with the proposal. In particular, the Commission invites the written
views of interested persons concerning whether the proposal is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) or any other provision of the Act, or
the rules and regulations thereunder. Although there do not appear to
be any issues relevant to approval or disapproval that would be
facilitated by an oral presentation of views, data, and arguments, the
Commission will consider, pursuant to Rule 19b-4, any request for an
opportunity to make an oral presentation.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, as amended by the Securities
Act Amendments of 1975, Public Law 94-29 (June 4, 1975), grants the
Commission flexibility to determine what type of proceeding--either
oral or notice and opportunity for written comments--is appropriate
for consideration of a particular proposal by a self-regulatory
organization. See Securities Act Amendments of 1975, Senate Comm. on
Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs, S. Rep. No. 75, 94th Cong., 1st
Sess. 30 (1975).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments regarding whether the proposal should be approved or
disapproved by May 23, 2016. Any person who wishes to file a rebuttal
to any other person's submission must file that rebuttal by June 6,
2016. The Commission asks that commenters address the sufficiency of
the Exchange's statements in support of the proposal, which are set
forth in the Notice \22\ and in Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change,\23\ in addition to any other comments they may wish to submit
about the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See supra note 3.
    \23\ See supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange provides that the Fund may invest in one or more of
the following broad categories of Municipal Securities: \24\ (a)
Municipal lease obligations; (b) municipal general obligation bonds;
(c) municipal revenue bonds; (d) municipal notes; (e) municipal cash
equivalents; (f) private activity bonds; and (g) pre-refunded and
escrowed to maturity bonds. Moreover, the Exchange represents that
under normal market conditions: (i) No component fixed income security
(excluding Treasury securities) will represent more than 30% of the
weight of the index or portfolio, and that the five highest weighted
component fixed income securities will not in the aggregate account for
more than 65% of the weight of the index or portfolio; (ii) component
securities that in the aggregate account for at least 90% of the weight
of the index or portfolio be either exempted securities or from a
specified type of issuer; (iii) at least 40% (based on dollar amount
invested) of the Municipal Securities in which the Fund invests will be
issued by issuers with total outstanding debt issuances that, in the
aggregate, have a minimum original principal amount outstanding of $75
million or more; and (iv) the underlying index or portfolio (excluding
one consisting entirely of exempted securities) will include securities
from a minimum of 13 non-affiliated issuers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ In addition, Municipal Securities include securities issued
by entities whose underlying assets are municipal bonds (i.e.,
tender option bond (TOB) trusts and custodial receipts trusts).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Apart from these broad representations, the Exchange provides no
other information about the kinds of municipal bonds in which the Fund
may invest. Accordingly, the Commission seeks comment on whether the
Exchange's representations relating to the Municipal Securities to be
held by the Fund are sufficient to limit the susceptibility of the
portfolio to manipulation, and are consistent with the requirements of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, which, among other things, requires that
the rules of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices.
    Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Nasdaq-2016-002 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Numbers SR-Nasdaq-2016-002. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of these filings also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Nasdaq-2016-002 and should
be submitted on or before May 23, 2016. Rebuttal comments should be
submitted by June 6, 2016.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-10146 Filed 4-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 192 (Thursday, October 3, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52879-52880]
[FR Doc No: 2019-21500]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1387-006.
    Applicants: Appalachian Power Company, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: PJM TOs submit compliance filing
per Commission's 8/30/2019 order in ER15-1387 to be effective 5/25/
2015.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5106.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2643-001.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Florida, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: DEF OATT Revisions (FRCC Dissolution
Amendment) to be effective 9/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5098.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2888-000.
    Applicants: PHWD Affiliate LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revised Market-Based Rate
Tariff to be effective 9/28/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5073.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2889-000.
    Applicants: Refresh Wind, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revised Market-Based Rate
Tariff to be effective 9/28/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5074.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2890-000.
    Applicants: Refresh Wind 2, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revised Market-Based Rate
Tariff to be effective 9/28/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5075.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2891-000.
    Applicants: Avista Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Avista Corp E Greenacres
Unsigned SA T1157 to be effective 10/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5077.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2892-000.
    Applicants: Terra-Gen 251 Wind, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revised Market-Based Rate
Tariff to be effective 9/28/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5083.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2893-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Depreciation Rate Update
Associated

with Rate Schedule No. 18 to be effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5085.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2894-000.
    Applicants: Terra-Gen Dixie Valley, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revised Market-Based Rate
Tariff to be effective 9/28/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5087.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2895-000.
    Applicants: Terra-Gen Energy Services, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revised Market-Based Rate
Tariff to be effective 9/28/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5092.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2896-000.
    Applicants: Terra-Gen VG Wind, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revised Market-Based Rate
Tariff to be effective 9/28/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5095.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2897-000.
    Applicants: NSTAR Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Third Supplement to Stony
Brook ? Ludlow Agreement to be effective 10/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5096.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2898-000.
    Applicants: Voyager Wind I, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revised Market-Based Rate
Tariff to be effective 9/28/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5099.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2899-000.
    Applicants: Voyager Wind II, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revised Market-Based Rate
Tariff to be effective 9/28/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5101.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2900-000.
    Applicants: Yavi Energy, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revised Market-Based Rate
Tariff to be effective 9/28/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5102.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2901-000.
    Applicants: Bronco Plains Wind, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Bronco Plains Wind, LLC
Application for Market-Based Rates to be effective 11/27/2019.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5144.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES19-63-000.
    Applicants: Mid-Atlantic Interstate Transmission, LL.
    Description: Application under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act
for Authorization to Issue Securities of Mid-Atlantic Interstate
Transmission, LLC.
    Filed Date: 9/27/19.
    Accession Number: 20190927-5105.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/18/19.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 27, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-21500 Filed 10-2-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P