[Federal Register: December 28, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 248)]
[Notices]
[Page 73932-73933]
[DOCID:fr28de07-191]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-56992; File No. SR-ISE-2007-119]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to the Amendment of International Securities Exchange
Holdings, Inc.'s Certificate of Incorporation and Trust Agreement

December 19, 2007.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on December 14, 2007, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(the ``ISE'' or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which items have been
substantially prepared by the Exchange. The ISE filed the proposed rule
change pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(3) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 19b-4(f)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to make technical changes to the trust
agreement (the ``Trust Agreement'') and the certificate of
incorporation (the ``Certificate of Incorporation'') of its parent,
International Securities Exchange Holdings, Inc. (``Holdings''), which
will be adopted in connection with a corporate transaction (the
``Transaction''), in which Holdings will become a wholly-owned indirect
subsidiary of Eurex Frankfurt AG.
    Certificate of Incorporation
    The Exchange is proposing to make a technical change to the
Certificate of Incorporation to correct the address of Holdings'
registered address in the state of Delaware. Specifically, Article
SECOND of the Certificate of Incorporation would be amended to read in
its entirety as follows:
    SECOND: The address of the Corporation's registered office in the
State of Delaware is 160 Greentree Drive, Suite 101, City of Dover,
County

of Kent, Delaware 19901. The name of its registered agent at such
address is National Registered Agents, Inc.
    Trust Agreement
    In addition, the ISE is proposing to make a technical change to the
Trust Agreement to provide that the full name of the trust is the
``International Securities Exchange Trust.'' Specifically, section 2.1
of the Trust Agreement would be amended to read in its entirety as
follows:
    Name. The name of the Trust shall be the International Securities
Exchange Trust (the ``ISE Trust'').

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    On December 13, 2007, the Commission approved a rule filing
submitted by the Exchange in connection with the Transaction \5\ which
included the Certificate of Incorporation and the Trust Agreement. The
purpose of this rule filing is to make technical changes to the Trust
Agreement and the Certificate of Incorporation necessary to permit the
Exchange and Holdings to effect the Transaction. The Exchange is
proposing to make a technical change to the Certificate of
Incorporation to correct the address of Holdings' registered address in
the State of Delaware. In addition, the ISE is proposing to make a
technical change to the Trust Agreement to provide that the full name
of the trust is the ``International Securities Exchange Trust.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56944 (December 13,
2007) (SR-ISE-2007-101).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The basis under the Act for this proposed rule change is the
requirement under section 6(b)(5) of the Act \6\ that an exchange have
rules that are designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. In particular, the proposal will permit the ISE to
effect the Transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is concerned solely with the
administration of the Exchange and has, therefore, become effective
pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(3) \8\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of
such proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such
rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \8\ 17 CFR 19b-4(f)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-ISE-2007-119 on the subject line.

Paper comments:

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-119. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
am and 3 pm. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the ISE. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-119 and should be
submitted on or before January 18, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-25180 Filed 12-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 222 (Friday, November 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57792-57793]
[FR Doc No: 2018-25043]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2018-0098]

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    Under part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this

document provides the public notice that on November 2, 2018, the
Regional Transportation District (RTD) and the City of Aurora,
Colorado, petitioned the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for a
waiver of compliance from certain provisions of the Federal railroad
safety regulations contained at 49 CFR part 222. FRA assigned the
petition Docket Number FRA-2018-0098.
    Specifically, petitioners seek a waiver from the provisions of 49
CFR 222.35(b)(1) to establish a new quiet zone consisting of two public
highway-rail grade crossings with active grade crossing warning devices
comprising both flashing lights and gates that are not equipped with
constant warning time devices. The crossing warning devices on the
proposed ``East Rail Line-Aurora Quiet Zone'' on the RTD A-Line are
primarily activated by a wireless crossing activation system (WCAS)
using ``GPS-determined train speed and location to predict how many
seconds a train is from the crossing.'' Petitioners assert that this
information is communicated wirelessly to the crossing warning devices
and seeks to provide constant warning times. Additionally, this system
is supplemented by a conventional track warning system in case the WCAS
is unavailable.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation's (DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations
Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested parties
desire an opportunity for oral comment and a public hearing, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Website: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
    Communications received by December 31, 2018 will be considered by
FRA before final action is taken. Comments received after that date
will be considered if practicable.
    Anyone can search the electronic form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better
inform its processes. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/
ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See also https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice for the
privacy notice of regulations.gov.

Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-25043 Filed 11-15-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 24 (Monday, February 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7772-7773]
[FR Doc No: 2023-02390]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0701]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Operations
Specifications, Part 129 Application

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the following collection of information was
published on June 23, 2022. There were no comments. The FAA assesses
the information collected and issues operations specifications to
foreign air carriers. These operations specifications assure the
foreign air carrier's ability to navigate and communicate safely within
the U.S. National Airspace System.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by March 8, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Danuta Pronczuk or Paul Thoren by
email at: [email protected]; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
[email protected]; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0749.
    Title: Operations Specifications, Part 129 Application.
    Form Numbers: There are no FAA forms associated with this
collection.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the following collection of information
was published on June 23, 2022 (87 FR 37545). The final rule published
in 2011, clarified and standardized the rules for applications by
foreign air carriers and foreign persons for operations specifications
issued under 14 CFR part 129 and established standards for amendment,
suspension and termination of those operations specifications. The
final rule also applied to foreign air carriers and foreign persons
operating U.S.-registered aircraft in common carriage solely outside
the United States. This action was necessary to update the process for
issuing operations specifications, and it established a regulatory
basis for current practices, such as amending, terminating, and
suspending operations specifications.
    Respondents: Approximately 29 new applicants annually and 451
existing foreign air carriers and foreign persons annually.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 27 Hours for new applicants.
47 hours for existing applicants.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 783 hours for new applicants and
21,197 hours for existing applicants.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Timothy R. Adams,
Flight Standards Service Acting Deputy Director, Safety Standards.
[FR Doc. 2023-02390 Filed 2-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 108 (Monday, June 6, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34206-34209]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11558]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0434; FRL-9636-01-OCSPP]

Teflubenzuron; Pesticide Tolerances

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of the
insecticide teflubenzuron in or on grape and grape, raisin. There is no
U.S. registration associated with these tolerances. BASF Corporation
requested these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FFDCA).

DATES: This regulation is effective June 6, 2022. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before August 5, 2022 and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0434, is available at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection
Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg.,
Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room and the OPP Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Please review the visitor instructions and additional information
about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Acting Director,
Registration Division (7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Office of the
Federal Register's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0434 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
August 5, 2022. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0434, by one of
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance

    In the Federal Register of August 24, 2021 (86 FR 47275) (FRL-8792-
02), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
0E8874) by BASF Corporation, 26 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC
27709. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.687 be amended by
establishing tolerances for residues of the insecticide teflubenzuron,
(N-[[(3,5-dichloro-2,4-difluorophenyl)amino]carbonyl]-2,6-
difluorobenzamide), in or on grape at 0.7 parts per million (ppm) and
grape, raisin at 0.9 ppm. That document referenced a summary of the
petition prepared by BASF Corporation, which is available in docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0434 in https://www.regulations.gov. No
substantive public comments were received in response to the notice of
filing.

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified therein, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and
other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for teflubenzuron including exposure resulting from
the tolerances established by this action. EPA's assessment of
exposures and risks associated with teflubenzuron follows.
    In an effort to streamline its publications in the Federal
Register, EPA is not reprinting sections that repeat what has been
previously published for tolerance rulemakings of the same pesticide
chemical. Where scientific information concerning a particular chemical
remains unchanged, the content of those sections would not vary between
tolerance rulemakings, and EPA considers referral back to those
sections as sufficient to provide an explanation of the information EPA
considered in making its safety determination for the new rulemaking.
    EPA has previously published tolerance rulemakings for
teflubenzuron in which EPA concluded, based on the available
information, that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm would
result from aggregate exposure to teflubenzuron and established
tolerances for residues of that chemical.

EPA is incorporating previously published sections from those
rulemakings as described further in this rulemaking, as they remain
unchanged.
    Toxicological Profile. For a discussion of the Toxicological
Profile of teflubenzuron, see Unit III.A of the teflubenzuron tolerance
rulemaking published in the Federal Register of October 30, 2015 (80 FR
66805) (FRL-9933-25).
    Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern. For a
discussion of the Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern
used for the safety assessment of teflubenzuron, see Unit III.B of the
October 30, 2015, rulemaking.
    Exposure Assessment. Much of the exposure assessment for
teflubenzuron remains unchanged from the discussion in Unit III.C of
the October 30, 2015, rulemaking, except as described below.
    The current exposure assessment incorporates the additional dietary
exposure from this petitioned-for tolerances. Because this action
establishes tolerances for residues of teflubenzuron in or on imported
commodities for which there are no associated U.S. registrations,
dietary exposure (food only) is the only anticipated exposure pathway.
There are no domestic agricultural or residential uses registered or
proposed for teflubenzuron that would result in drinking water or
residential exposures. This tolerance petition does not warrant an
occupational handler exposure assessment because the petition is for
import tolerances without a U.S. registration. There are no short- or
intermediate-term exposures from the use of teflubenzuron. An acute
risk assessment was not performed because there were no toxicological
effects attributable to a single dose identified.
    The unrefined chronic dietary (food only) exposure estimates
represent the aggregate exposure assessment and assumed that
teflubenzuron residues are present in all commodities at tolerance
levels and that 100% of all crops are treated. Empirical processing
factors of 0.08 for apple juice and 0.04 for orange juice were
incorporated into the dietary exposure model and the Agency's 2018
default processing factors were used to estimate residues in other
processed commodities. The Agency's approach for assessing these
factors is discussed in detail in the document titled ``Chronic Dietary
(Food Only) Exposure and Risk Assessment for the Proposed Tolerances
Without a U.S. Registration for Residues in/on Grapes.'' in docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0434.
    Safety Factor for Infants and Children. EPA continues to conclude
that there is reliable data showing that the safety of infants and
children would be adequately protected if the Food Quality Protection
Act (FQPA) safety factor were reduced from 10X to 1X. The reasons for
that decision are articulated in Unit III.D of the October 30, 2015,
rulemaking.
    Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety. EPA determines whether
acute and chronic dietary pesticide exposures are safe by comparing
aggregate exposure estimates to the acute population-adjusted dose
(aPAD) and chronic population-adjusted dose PAD (cPAD). Short-,
intermediate-, and chronic-term risks are evaluated by comparing the
estimated aggregate food, water, and residential exposure to the
appropriate points of departure (PODs) to ensure that an adequate
margin of exposure (MOE) exists.
    An endpoint of concern attributable to a single dose was not
identified; therefore, an acute dietary assessment was not performed.
Chronic dietary risks are below the Agency's level of concern of 100%
of the cPAD for the U.S. general population and all population
subgroups. The most highly exposed population subgroup is children 1-2
years old with an estimated risk of 48% of the cPAD.
    In accordance with the EPA's ``Final Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk
Assessment'' (March 2005), the Cancer Assessment Review Committee
(CARC) classified teflubenzuron as ``Suggestive Evidence of
Carcinogenic Potential'' based on the presence of rare liver tumors in
male mice only. The Agency has determined that quantification of risk
using a non-linear approach (i.e., reference dose [RfD]) will
adequately account for all chronic toxicity, including carcinogenicity,
that could result from exposure to teflubenzuron. Therefore, the
chronic dietary risks, which are not of concern, are considered
protective of both non-cancer and cancer effects.
    Determination of Safety. Therefore, based on the risk assessments
and information described above, EPA concludes there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the general population, or to
infants and children, from aggregate exposure to teflubenzuron
residues. More detailed information about the Agency's analysis can be
found at https://www.regulations.gov in the document titled ``Chronic
Dietary (Food Only) Exposure and Risk Assessment for the Proposed
Tolerances Without a U.S. Registration for Residues in/on Grapes.''
This document can be found in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0434.

IV. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    An adequate analytical method is available to enforce the
petitioned-for tolerances for residues of teflubenzuron in/on crop
commodities. Samples were analyzed for residues of teflubenzuron using
a high-performance liquid chromatography method with tandem mass
spectrometry detection (LC/MS/MS), SOP-PA.0250. Acceptable concurrent
recoveries were reported for samples of grape fortified with
teflubenzuron at 0.01-1.0 ppm, thus validating the method. The limit of
quantitation (LOQ; determined as the lowest level of method validation,
LLMV) was 0.01 ppm. The estimated LOD (limit of detection) was 20% of
the LOQ or 0.002 ppm.
    These methods may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry
Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Road, Fort Meade, MD
20755-5350; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>. email address:
[email protected].

B. International Residue Limits

    In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). Codex is a joint United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health Organization food standards program, and it
is recognized as an international food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to which the United States is a party.
EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from a Codex MRL;
however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain the reasons
for departing from the Codex level.
    The U.S. tolerance level for grape residues established in this
action is harmonized with Codex. There are no established Canadian or
Mexican MRLs for residues of teflubenzuron on grape. Additionally,
there are no established Codex, Canadian, or Mexican MRLs for residues
of teflubenzuron on grape, raisin.

C. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances

    Based upon the submitted data, no revisions to the petitioned-for
tolerances proposed for residues in/on grape and grape, raisin are
needed.

V. Conclusion

    Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of the
insecticide teflubenzuron, (N-[[(3,5-dichloro-2,4-
difluorophenyl)amino]carbonyl]-2,6-difluorobenzamide), in or on grape
at 0.7 ppm; and grape, raisin, at 0.9 ppm.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerances in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999), and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply to this action. In addition,
this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

VII. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: May 24, 2022.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending
40 CFR chapter I as follows:

PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. In Sec.  180.687:
0
a. Amend paragraph (a)(1) by:
0
i. Adding a table heading;
0
ii. Adding the commodities ``Grape'' and ``Grape, raisin'' to the table
in alphabetical order; and
0
iii. Revising footnote 1.
0
b. Add a reserved paragraph (a)(2).
0
c. Remove and reserve paragraphs (b), (c), and (d).
    The additions and revision read as follows:

Sec.  180.687  Teflubenzuron; tolerances for residues.

    (a) * * *
    (1) * * *

                       Table 1 to Paragraph (a)(1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Parts per
                        Commodity                             million
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                * * * * *
Grape \1\...............................................             0.7
Grape, raisin \1\.......................................             0.9

                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Tolerance without U.S. registration.

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-11558 Filed 6-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9764-9766]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03648]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-94251; File No. SR-MIAX-2022-09]

Self-Regulatory Organizations: Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change by Miami International
Securities Exchange, LLC To Amend Exchange Rule 1308, Supervision of
Accounts

February 15, 2022.
    Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice
is hereby given that on February 3, 2022, Miami International
Securities Exchange, LLC (``MIAX Options'' or the ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing a proposal to amend Exchange Rule 1308,
Supervision of Accounts, to extend the temporary remote inspection
relief for Members \3\ to complete their branch office \4\ inspections
for the calendar years 2020 and 2021 to include calendar year 2022
through December 31, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The term ``Member'' means an individual or organization
approved to exercise the trading rights associated with a Trading
Permit. Members are deemed ``members'' under the Exchange Act. See
Exchange Rule 100.
    \4\ A ``branch office'' is any location where one or more
associated persons of a Member regularly conduct the business of
effecting any transactions in, or inducing or attempting to induce
the purchase or sale of any security, or is held out as such, with
such exclusions pursuant to Exchange Rule 1306(c)(1)-(7). See
Exchange Rule 1306(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at http://www.miaxoptions.com/rule-filings/ at MIAX Options'
principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 1308, Supervision of
Accounts, to extend the temporary remote inspection relief for Members
to complete their branch office inspections for the calendar years 2020
and 2021 to include calendar year 2022 through December 31, 2022.
    The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a host of operational disruptions
to the securities industry and impacted Members, regulators, investors,
and other stakeholders. In response to the pandemic, the Exchange began
providing temporary relief to Members from specified Exchange Rules and
requirements, including Exchange Rule 1308(d), Annual Branch Office
Inspections.
    Exchange Rules require Members to conduct branch \5\ and non-branch
office and location inspections pursuant to certain annual cycles.
Specifically, pursuant to Exchange Rule 1308(d), each branch office
that supervises one or more non-branch location must be inspected no
less often than once each calendar year, unless it qualifies for
certain exemptions.\6\ Every branch office, without exception, must be
inspected at least once every three calendar-years. Members must
maintain written reports of such inspections.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Exchange notes that notwithstanding the exclusions in
subparagraphs (c)(1)-(7) of Exchange Rule 1306, any location that is
responsible for supervising the activities of persons associated
with a Member at one or more non-branch locations of such Member is
considered to be a branch office. See Exchange Rule 1306(d).
    \6\ A Member may demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Exchange
that because of proximity, special reporting or supervisory
practice, other arrangements may satisfy Exchange Rule 1308(d)'s
requirements for a particular branch office, or that, based upon the
written policies and procedures of such Member providing for a
systematic risk-based surveillance system, the Member submits a
proposal to the Exchange and receives, in writing, an exemption from
the requirement in Exchange 1308(d), pursuant to Exchange Rule
1308(e).
    \7\ See Exchange Rule 1308(d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In November 2020, the Exchange adopted Exchange Rule 1308(d)(4) and
(d)(5), which has expired by its terms, that extended the time by which
Members must complete their calendar year 2020 inspection obligations
to March 31, 2021, without an on-site visit to the office or
location.\8\ The Exchange Rule 1308(d)(5) automatically sunset on
December 31, 2021, to provide Members the option of satisfying their
inspection obligations under Exchange Rule 1308 remotely for calendar
years 2020 and 2021, subject to specified conditions,\9\ due to the
logistical challenges of going on-site while public health and safety
concerns related to COVID-19 persisted. The Exchange notes that these
temporary rules are substantively identical to the temporary inspection
extension and remote relief rules filed by the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (``FINRA'').\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90937 (January 25,
2021), 86 FR 6944 (January 15, 2021) (SR-MIAX-2021-01).
    \9\ See id.
    \10\ See Securities and Exchange Act Release Nos. 89188 (June
30, 2020), 85 FR 40713 (July 7, 2020) (SR-FINRA-2020-019); and 90454
(November 18, 2020), 85 FR 75097 (November 24, 2020) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of File No. SR-FINRA-2020-040).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While there are signs of improvement, much uncertainty remains. The
emergence of the COVID-19 variants,\11\ dissimilar vaccination rates
throughout the United States, and the uptick in transmissions in many
locations indicate that COVID-19 remains an active and real public
health concern.\12\

The Exchange understands that Members have delayed their return-to-
office plans due to the continued pandemic and are considering
implementing or have implemented hybrid work arrangements dependent on
functions and regulatory requirements.\13\ To that end, in order to
address ongoing industry-wide concerns regarding having to conduct in-
person office inspections while safety concerns related to the pandemic
persist and to align with pandemic-related regulatory relief provided
by FINRA, which recently extended their substantively identical
temporary remote inspection rules,\14\ the Exchange proposes to extend
Exchange Rule 1308(d)(5) to cover calendar year 2022 inspection
obligations through December 31, 2022. The proposed extension would
provide clarity to Members on regulatory requirements and account for
the time needed for many Members to carefully assess when and how to
have their employees safely return to their offices in light of
vaccination coverage in the U.S. and transmission levels of the virus,
including any emergent variants throughout the country.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(``CDC''), What You Need to Know About Variants, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/variant.html (stating, in
part, that ``the Delta variant causes more infections and spreads
faster than earlier forms of the virus that causes COVID19'')
(updated September 3, 2021). See also CDC, The Possibility of COVID-
19 Illness After Vaccination: Breakthrough Infections, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/effectiveness/why-measure-effectiveness/breakthrough-cases.html (stating, in part,
that ``COVID-19 vaccines are effective at preventing infection,
serious illness, and death. Most people who get COVID-19 are
unvaccinated. However, since vaccines are not 100% effective at
preventing infection, some people who are fully vaccinated will
still get COVID-19 . . . People who get vaccine breakthrough
infections can be contagious'') (updated August 23, 2021).
    \12\ For example, President Joe Biden on July 29, 2021,
announced several measures to increase the number of people
vaccinated against COVID-19 and to slow the spread of the Delta
variant, including strengthening safety protocols for federal
government employees and contractors. See https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/07/29/factsheet-president-biden-to-announce-new-actions-to-get-more-americansvaccinated-and-slow-the-spread-of-the-delta-variant. More
recently, President Joe Biden on August 31, 2021, briefed the press
on, among other things, the government's response to the COVID-19
surge, noting the government's continuing efforts to help states
with Delta variant outbreaks. See https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-rom/press-briefings/2021/08/31/pressbriefing-by-white-house-covid-19-response-team-and-public-health-officials-53/.
    \13\ The Exchange notes that a majority of its Members are FINRA
member firms as well, and that through FINRA's ongoing monitoring,
the Exchange has learned that many of its Members have delayed plans
to require a full return to the office and that most continue to
operate in a remote or hybrid environment.
    \14\ See Securities and Exchange Act Release Nos. 93002
(September 15, 2021), 86 FR 52508 (September 21, 2021) (SR-FINRA-
2021-023); and 94018 (January 20, 2022), 87 FR 4072 (January 26,
2022) (SR-FINRA-2022-001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By extending Exchange Rule 1308(d)(5) through December 31, 2022,
the Exchange does not propose to amend the other conditions of the
temporary rule. The proposed amendment to Exchange Rule 1308(d)(5)
simply provides that for calendar year 2022, a Member has the option to
conduct those inspections remotely through December 31, 2022. The
current conditions of Exchange Rule 1308(d)(5) for Members that elect
to conduct remote inspections would remain unchanged. Such Members must
amend or supplement their written supervisory procedures for remote
inspections, use remote inspections as part of an effective supervisory
system, and maintain the required documentation. The additional period
of time would also enable the Exchange to further monitor the
effectiveness of remote inspections and their impacts--positive or
negative--on Members' overall supervisory systems in the evolving
workplace. Notwithstanding the proposed temporary rule change, a Member
remains subject to the other requirements of Exchange Rule 1308(d).
    The Exchange continues to believe this temporary remote inspection
option is a reasonable alternative to provide to Members to fulfill
their Exchange Rule 1308(d) obligations during the pandemic and is
designed to achieve the investor protection objectives of the
inspection requirements under these unique circumstances. Members
should consider whether, under their particular operating conditions,
reliance on remote inspections would be reasonable under the
circumstances. For example, Members with offices that are open to the
public or that are otherwise doing business as usual should consider
whether some form of in-person inspections would be feasible and
appropriately contribute to a supervisory system that is reasonably
designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities laws and
regulations as well as with applicable Exchange Rules.
    The Exchange notes that the proposed rule change is substantively
identical to the proposed rule changes recently filed by FINRA.\15\ The
Exchange notes that MIAX Chapter XIII is incorporated by reference into
the rulebooks of the Exchange's affiliates, MIAX PEARL, LLC (``Pearl'')
and MIAX Emerald, LLC (``Emerald''). As such, the amendments to MIAX
Chapter XIII proposed herein will also apply to MIAX Pearl and MIAX
Emerald Chapters XIII.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\16\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change
is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \17\ requirements that the rules
of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts
and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \18\ requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \18\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes that, in light of the impact
of COVID-19 on the performance of on-site office and location
inspections pursuant to Exchange Rule 1308(d), the proposed temporary
rule change is intended to provide Members a temporary regulatory
option to conduct inspections of offices and locations remotely during
the calendar year 2022. The proposed temporary rule change does not
relieve Members from meeting their existing core regulatory obligations
to establish and maintain a system to supervise the activities of each
associate person that is reasonably designed to achieve compliance with
applicable securities laws and regulations as well as with applicable
Exchange Rules that directly serve investor protection. In a time when
faced with ongoing challenges resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, the
Exchange believes that the proposed temporary rule change provides
sensibly tailored relief that will afford Members the ability to assess
when and how to implement their work re-entry plans as measured against
the health and safety of their personnel, while continuing to serve and
promote the protection of investors and the public interest.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not
believe the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intramarket
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because the proposed extension of the temporary
remote inspection relief rule will apply equally to all Members
required to conduct office and location inspections in calendar year
2022 through December 31, 2022. The Exchange further does not believe
that the proposed extension to the temporary rule will impose any
burden on intermarket competition because it relates only to the
extension

of the remote manner in which inspections for the calendar year 2022
may be conducted. Additionally, and as stated above, FINRA has recently
submitted a filing to extend its substantively identical temporary
remote relief rule for its trading permit holders and members in the
same manner.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See supra note 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such
shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective
pursuant to 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \20\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \21\
thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-MIAX-2022-09 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2022-09. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2022-09 and
should be submitted on or before March 15, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\22\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-03648 Filed 2-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: April 29, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 83)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 23066-23067]
[DOCID:fr29ap08-2]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 510

New Animal Drugs; Change of Sponsor's Name

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal
drug regulations to reflect a change of sponsor's name from Halocarbon
Laboratories, Division of Halocarbon Products Corp., to Halocarbon
Products Corp.

DATES: This rule is effective April 29, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David R. Newkirk, Center for
Veterinary Medicine (HFV-100), Food and Drug Administration, 7500
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Halocarbon Laboratories, Division of
Halocarbon Products Corp., 887 Kinderkamack Rd., P.O. Box 661, River
Ridge, NJ 07661, has informed FDA that it has changed its name to
Halocarbon Products Corp. Accordingly, the agency is amending the
regulations in 21 CFR 510.600(c) to reflect these changes. FDA is also
correcting the sponsor's address in the regulation.
    This rule does not meet the definition of ``rule'' in 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(A) because it is a rule of ``particular applicability.''
Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements
in 5 U.S.C. 801-808.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 510

    Administrative practice and procedure, Animal drugs, Labeling,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

0
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and
redelegated to

the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 510 is amended as
follows:

PART 510--NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 510 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 353, 360b, 371, 379e.

0
2. In Sec.  510.600 in the table in paragraph (c)(1), revise the entry
for ``Halocarbon Laboratories''; and in the table in paragraph (c)(2),
revise the entry for ``012164'' to read as follows:

Sec.  510.600  Names, addresses, and drug labeler codes of sponsors of
approved applications.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Firm name and address                  Drug labeler code
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                * * * * *
Halocarbon Products Corp., 887 Kinderkamack   012164
 Rd., River Edge, NJ 07661.
                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (2) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Drug labeler code                 Firm name and address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                * * * * *
012164                       Halocarbon Products Corp., 887 Kinderkamack
                              Rd., River Edge, NJ 07661.
                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: April 16, 2008.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. E8-9328 Filed 4-28-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 67 (Thursday, April 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19337-19338]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8250]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2232-589]

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC; Notice of Application for Amendment
of License and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Non-project use of project lands and waters.
    b. Project No: 2232-589.
    c. Date Filed: March 2, 2011.
    d. Applicant: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Catawba-Wateree Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The proposed non-project use would be located on
Fishing Creek Lake, Lancaster County, South Carolina.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Kelvin K. Reagan, Manager Lake Services,
P.O. Box 1006, Charlotte, NC 28201-1006,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Mr. William Doran,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and protest:
April 30, 2011.
    All documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See, 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. If unable to be
filed electronically, documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an
original and seven copies should be mailed to: Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426. Commenter's can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters,
without prior registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and
contact information at the end of your comments. Please include the
project number (P-2232-589) on any comments, motions, or
recommendations filed.
    k. Description of Request: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC requests
Commission authorization to lease to Craft development, LLC, 9.510
acres of project lands on Fishing Creek Lake for a true public-use
marina (Edgewater Public Marina) for use by the general public, and
four residential marinas (Edgewater Community Docks) for use by the
residents of Edgewater development. The true public-use and residential
marinas will accommodate 156 and 185 boat slips respectively for a
total of 341 slips and 24 cluster docks. The true public-use marina
also includes: two courtesy docks, fuel service, put-in well, and will
require 522.4 cubic yards of dredging activity.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. You may also
register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to
be notified via e-mail of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is
also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item
(h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filing must (1)
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or
``MOTION TO INTERVENE'' as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the
name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise
comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, motions to intervene, or protests must set forth their
evidentiary basis and otherwise comply with the

requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may obtain copies of the
application directly from the applicant. A copy of any protest or
motion to intervene must be served upon each representative of the
applicant specified in the particular application. If an intervener
files comments or documents with the Commission relating to the merits
of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a particular
resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document on that
resource agency. A copy of all other filings in reference to this
application must be accompanied by proof of service on all persons
listed in the service list prepared by the Commission in this
proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.

    Dated: March 31, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-8250 Filed 4-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P