[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 111 (Monday, June 10, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34561-34565]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13364]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30903; Amdt. No. 3538]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective June 10, 2013. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of June 10, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169; or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability_All SIAPs are available online free of charge. Visit
nfdc.faa.gov to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP copies may be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard A. Dunham III, Flight
Procedure Standards Branch (AFS-420) Flight Technologies and Programs
Division, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration,
Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082 Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) by amending the referenced SIAPs.
The complete regulatory description of each SIAP is listed on the
appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the National Flight Data
Center (FDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P-NOTAM), and is incorporated
by reference in the

amendment under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and Sec.  97.20 of
Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the need for a
special format make their verbatim publication in the Federal Register
expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use the regulatory
text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction on charts
printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP contained in FAA form documents is
unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR sections and
specifies the types of SIAP and the corresponding effective dates. This
amendment also identifies the airport and its location, the procedure
and the amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP as amended in the transmittal. For safety and
timeliness of change considerations, this amendment incorporates only
specific changes contained for each SIAP as modified by FDC/P-NOTAMs.
    The SIAPs, as modified by FDC P-NOTAM, and contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these changes to
SIAPs, the TERPS criteria were applied only to specific conditions
existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in this rule
have been previously issued by the FAA in a FDC NOTAM as an emergency
action of immediate flight safety relating directly to published
aeronautical charts. The circumstances which created the need for all
these SIAP amendments requires making them effective in less than 30
days.
    Because of the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs
and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and public procedure
before adopting these SIAPs are impracticable and contrary to the
public interest and, where applicable, that good cause exists for
making these SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR part 97

    Air Traffic Control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 24, 2013.
John M. Allen,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal regulations, Part 97, 14 CFR part 97, is amended by
amending Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, effective at 0901 UTC
on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

Sec.  97.23, 97.25, 97.27, 97.29, 97.31, 97.33, 97.35  [Amended]

    By amending: Sec.  97.23 VOR, VOR/DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or
TACAN; Sec.  97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; Sec.
97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; Sec.  97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
Sec.  97.31 RADAR SIAPs; Sec.  97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and Sec.  97.35 COPTER
SIAPs, Identified as follows:

* * * Effective Upon Publication

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      AIRAC Date            State               City               Airport          FDC No.      FDC Date                      Subject
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6/27/13..............  NE.............  Alliance...........  Alliance Muni......       2/3777      5/22/13  NDB RWY 12, Orig.
6/27/13..............  AK.............  McGrath............  McGrath............       2/7217      5/13/13  Takeoff Minimums and (Obstacle) DP, Amdt 2.
6/27/13..............  OR.............  Portland...........  Portland-Hillsboro.       3/0302      5/10/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Orig-A.
6/27/13..............  AZ.............  Phoenix............  Phoenix-Mesa              3/0620       5/8/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 12C, Amdt 1.
                                                              Gateway.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Big Bear City......  Big Bear City......       3/0625      5/10/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Orig-A.
6/27/13..............  NC.............  Wadesboro..........  Anson County--Jeff        3/1517      5/16/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 34, Orig.
                                                              Cloud Field.
6/27/13..............  MD.............  Baltimore..........  Baltimore/                3/1524      5/10/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 10, ILS RWY 10 (SA CAT I),
                                                              Washington Intl                                ILS RWY 10 (CAT II), ILS RWY 10 (CAT III),
                                                              Thurgood Marshall.                             Amdt 21.
6/27/13..............  NJ.............  Teterboro..........  Teterboro..........       3/1577      5/16/13  VOR RWY 24, Orig-B.
6/27/13..............  AZ.............  Phoenix............  Phoenix-Mesa              3/1690       5/8/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 30C, Amdt 3.
                                                              Gateway.
6/27/13..............  AZ.............  Phoenix............  Phoenix-Mesa              3/1691       5/8/13  VOR OR TACAN RWY 30C, Amdt 2.
                                                              Gateway.
6/27/13..............  TN.............  Smyrna.............  Smyrna.............       3/1964      5/16/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 32, Amdt 5C.
6/27/13..............  TN.............  Smyrna.............  Smyrna.............       3/1965      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Orig-A.
6/27/13..............  TN.............  Smyrna.............  Smyrna.............       3/1966      5/16/13  VOR/DME RWY 14, Amdt 7A.
6/27/13..............  TN.............  Smyrna.............  Smyrna.............       3/1967      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig-A.
6/27/13..............  TN.............  Smyrna.............  Smyrna.............       3/1968      5/16/13  NDB RWY 32, Amdt 9A.
6/27/13..............  TN.............  Smyrna.............  Smyrna.............       3/1969      5/16/13  VOR/DME RWY 32, Amdt 13A.
6/27/13..............  NE.............  Mc Cook............  Mc Cook Ben Nelson        3/2345       5/8/13  VOR RWY 30, Amdt 11.
                                                              Rgnl.
6/27/13..............  NE.............  Mc Cook............  Mc Cook Ben Nelson        3/2346       5/8/13  VOR RWY 12, Amdt 12.
                                                              Rgnl.
6/27/13..............  NE.............  Mc Cook............  Mc Cook Ben Nelson        3/2347       5/8/13  VOR RWY 22, Amdt 4E.
                                                              Rgnl.
6/27/13..............  NE.............  Mc Cook............  Mc Cook Ben Nelson        3/2348       5/8/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Orig-B.
                                                              Rgnl.
6/27/13..............  NE.............  Mc Cook............  Mc Cook Ben Nelson        3/2349       5/8/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Orig-A.
                                                              Rgnl.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Sacramento.........  Sacramento Intl....       3/2574      5/16/13  RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 34R, Orig.

6/27/13..............  CA.............  Sacramento.........  Sacramento Intl....       3/2575      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 16L, Amdt 1.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Sacramento.........  Sacramento Intl....       3/2577      5/16/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 16L, Amdt 2.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Sacramento.........  Sacramento Intl....       3/2587      5/16/13  RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 16L, Orig.
6/27/13..............  NC.............  Concord............  Concord Rgnl.......       3/2606      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 2, Orig.
6/27/13..............  WA.............  Yakima.............  Yakima Air Terminal/      3/2641      5/10/13  VOR/DME OR TACAN RWY 27, Amdt 8.
                                                              Mcallister Field.
6/27/13..............  IN.............  Muncie.............  Delaware County           3/2642      5/16/13  VOR RWY 14, Amdt 17.
                                                              Rgnl.
6/27/13..............  IN.............  Muncie.............  Delaware County           3/2645      5/16/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 32, Amdt 9B.
                                                              Rgnl.
6/27/13..............  IN.............  Muncie.............  Delaware County           3/2646      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig.
                                                              Rgnl.
6/27/13..............  WA.............  Hoquiam............  Bowerman...........       3/2796      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 6, Amdt 1.
6/27/13..............  WA.............  Hoquiam............  Bowerman...........       3/2798      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Amdt 2A.
6/27/13..............  WA.............  Hoquiam............  Bowerman...........       3/2799      5/16/13  ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 24, Amdt 4.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Marysville.........  Yuba County........       3/2897      5/10/13  Takeoff Minimums and (Obstacle) DP, Amdt 1.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Marysville.........  Yuba County........       3/2975       5/8/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 14, Amdt 5A.
6/27/13..............  KS.............  Manhattan..........  Manhattan Rgnl.....       3/3414      5/16/13  ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 3, Amdt 7.
6/27/13..............  MI.............  Saginaw............  Saginaw County H.W.       3/3503       5/8/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, Amdt 1B.
                                                              Browne.
6/27/13..............  MI.............  Saginaw............  Saginaw County H.W.       3/3505       5/8/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Orig-A.
                                                              Browne.
6/27/13..............  MI.............  Saginaw............  Saginaw County H.W.       3/3506       5/8/13  ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 27, Orig-B.
                                                              Browne.
6/27/13..............  SC.............  Greer..............  Greenville                3/3777      5/16/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 22, Amdt 5.
                                                              Spartanburg Intl.
6/27/13..............  FL.............  Zephyrhills........  Zephyrhills Muni...       3/3786      5/16/13  NDB RWY 22, Amdt 1.
6/27/13..............  FL.............  Zephyrhills........  Zephyrhills Muni...       3/3792      5/16/13  NDB RWY 18, Amdt 1.
6/27/13..............  FL.............  Zephyrhills........  Zephyrhills Muni...       3/3793      5/16/13  NDB RWY 4, Amdt 1.
6/27/13..............  FL.............  Zephyrhills........  Zephyrhills Muni...       3/3795      5/16/13  NDB RWY 36, Amdt 1.
6/27/13..............  FL.............  Zephyrhills........  Zephyrhills Muni...       3/3796      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Orig.
6/27/13..............  FL.............  Zephyrhills........  Zephyrhills Muni...       3/3797      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig.
6/27/13..............  FL.............  Zephyrhills........  Zephyrhills Muni...       3/3798      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Orig.
6/27/13..............  WI.............  Appleton...........  Outagamie County          3/3890      5/16/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 30, Amdt 3.
                                                              Rgnl.
6/27/13..............  MA.............  Worcester..........  Worcester Rgnl.....       3/3943      5/15/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 11, Amdt 23.
6/27/13..............  VA.............  Martinsville.......  Blue Ridge.........       3/3995      5/15/13  LOC RWY 30, Amdt 1A.
6/27/13..............  OK.............  Lawton.............  Lawton-Fort Sill          3/4074      5/16/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 35, Amdt 7E.
                                                              Rgnl.
6/27/13..............  CO.............  Denver.............  Denver Intl........       3/4138       5/8/13  RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 25, Orig.
6/27/13..............  GA.............  Pine Mountain......  Harris County......       3/4472      5/15/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Orig.
6/27/13..............  GA.............  Pine Mountain......  Harris County......       3/4473      5/15/13  VOR A, Amdt 5.
6/27/13..............  GA.............  Pine Mountain......  Harris County......       3/4474      5/15/13  NDB RWY 9, Amdt 9.
6/27/13..............  MS.............  Columbus...........  Columbus-Lowndes          3/4478      5/15/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig.
                                                              County.
6/27/13..............  MS.............  Columbus...........  Columbus-Lowndes          3/4479      5/15/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Orig-A.
                                                              County.
6/27/13..............  MS.............  Columbus...........  Columbus-Lowndes          3/4480      5/15/13  VOR A, Amdt 13.
                                                              County.
6/27/13..............  RI.............  Block Island.......  Block Island State.       3/4484      5/15/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Orig-B.
6/27/13..............  RI.............  Block Island.......  Block Island State.       3/4485      5/15/13  VOR/DME RWY 10, Amdt 5B.
6/27/13..............  NC.............  Siler City.........  Siler City Muni....       3/4488      5/15/13  VOR OR GPS A, Amdt 2.
6/27/13..............  TN.............  Jamestown..........  Jamestown Muni.....       3/4489      5/15/13  VOR/DME OR GPS A AMDT 1A.
6/27/13..............  NC.............  Shelby.............  Shelby-Cleveland          3/4490      5/14/13  NDB RWY 23, Amdt 1A.
                                                              County Rgnl.
6/27/13..............  PA.............  Allentown..........  Allentown Queen           3/4491      5/14/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 7, AMDT 1.
                                                              City Muni.
6/27/13..............  MS.............  Jackson............  Jackson-Evers Intl.       3/4610      5/15/13  RADAR-1, Amdt 11B.
6/27/13..............  RI.............  Block Island.......  Block Island State.       3/4612      5/15/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Amdt 1.
6/27/13..............  NY.............  New York...........  La Guardia.........       3/4773      5/15/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 13, Amdt 1.
6/27/13..............  AK.............  Savoonga...........  Savoonga...........       3/4787      5/13/13  VOR/DME RWY 23, Amdt 1.
6/27/13..............  AK.............  Savoonga...........  Savoonga...........       3/4788      5/13/13  VOR RWY 23, Amdt 1.
6/27/13..............  AK.............  Savoonga...........  Savoonga...........       3/4916      5/13/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Amdt 1.
6/27/13..............  NV.............  Ely................  Ely Arpt/Yelland          3/4917      5/16/13  VOR A, Amdt 7.
                                                              Fld/.
6/27/13..............  VA.............  Richmond/Ashland...  Hanover County Muni       3/5374      5/14/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 16, Orig-A.
6/27/13..............  VA.............  Richmond/Ashland...  Hanover County Muni       3/5375      5/14/13  LOC RWY 16, Amdt 3A.
6/27/13..............  VA.............  Richmond/Ashland...  Hanover County Muni       3/5376      5/14/13  VOR RWY 16, Amdt 2A.
6/27/13..............  NC.............  New Bern...........  Coastal Carolina          3/5416      5/14/13  VOR RWY 4, Amdt 4A.
                                                              Regional.
6/27/13..............  GA.............  Washington.........  Washington-Wilkes         3/5475      5/14/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Amdt 1.
                                                              County.
6/27/13..............  KY.............  Lexington..........  Blue Grass.........       3/5492      5/14/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Orig.
6/27/13..............  WA.............  Pullman/Moscow, ID.  Pullman/Moscow Rgnl       3/6144      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 6, Amdt 2A.
6/27/13..............  TX.............  Dallas-Fort Worth..  Dallas/Fort Worth         3/6177      5/10/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 35R, ILS RWY 35R (SA CAT I),
                                                              Intl.                                          ILS RWY 35R (CAT II), ILS RWY 35R (CAT
                                                                                III), Amdt 4.
6/27/13..............  TX.............  Dallas-Fort Worth..  Dallas/Fort Worth         3/6178      5/10/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 17R, ILS RWY 17R (SA CAT I),
                                                              Intl.                                          ILS RWY 17R (SA CAT II), Amdt 23.

6/27/13..............  IL.............  DeCATur............  DeCATur............       3/6182      5/16/13  LOC BC RWY 24, Amdt 10C.
6/27/13..............  TX.............  Commerce...........  Commerce Muni......       3/6249      5/15/13  VOR/DME A, Amdt 3.
6/27/13..............  TX.............  Dallas-Fort Worth..  Dallas/Fort Worth         3/6536      5/16/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 17C, ILS RWY 17C (SA CAT I),
                                                              Intl.                                          ILS RWY 17C (CAT II), ILS RWY 17C (CAT
                                                                                III), Amdt 10.
6/27/13..............  MN.............  Minneapolis........  Minneapolis-St Paul       3/6544      5/16/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 12R, ILS RWY 12R (SA CAT I),
                                                              Intl/Wold                                      ILS RWY 12R (CAT II), ILS RWY 12R (CAT
                                                              Chamberlain.                                   III), Amdt 10.
6/27/13..............  SC.............  Kingstree..........  Williamsburg Rgnl..       3/6608      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig.
6/27/13..............  TX.............  Dallas-Fort Worth..  Dallas/Fort Worth         3/6609      5/14/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 36L, Amdt 3.
                                                              Intl.
6/27/13..............  SC.............  Kingstree..........  Williamsburg Rgnl..       3/6615      5/16/13  NDB RWY 14, Amdt 4A.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Marysville.........  Yuba County........       3/6687       5/8/13  VOR RWY 32, Amdt 10D.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Marysville.........  Yuba County........       3/6688       5/8/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Marysville.........  Yuba County........       3/6689       5/8/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Orig.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Vacaville..........  Nut Tree...........       3/6814      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 20, Orig.
6/27/13..............  CO.............  Rifle..............  Garfield County           3/6815       5/8/13  RNAV (GPS) X RWY 26, Amdt 1.
                                                              Rgnl.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Camarillo..........  Camarillo..........       3/7007      5/10/13  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 26, Orig.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Concord............  Buchanan Field.....       3/7009      5/10/13  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 19R, Orig.
6/27/13..............  MT.............  Butte..............  Bert Mooney........       3/7010      5/10/13  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 15, Amdt 1A.
6/27/13..............  UT.............  Ogden..............  Ogden-Hinckley.....       3/7015      5/10/13  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 3, Orig-A.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Half Moon Bay......  Half Moon Bay......       3/7018      5/10/13  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 30, Orig-A.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Half Moon Bay......  Half Moon Bay......       3/7020      5/10/13  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 12, Orig-A.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Inyokern...........  Inyokern...........       3/7067       5/8/13  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 2, Orig-A.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Inyokern...........  Inyokern...........       3/7068       5/8/13  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 2, Orig.
6/27/13..............  ID.............  Mc Call............  Mc Call Muni.......       3/7268      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 34, Orig.
6/27/13..............  AR.............  Springdale.........  Springdale Muni....       3/7453      5/14/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 18, Amdt 8B.
6/27/13..............  AR.............  Springdale.........  Springdale Muni....       3/7456      5/14/13  VOR/DME RWY 36, Amdt 9B.
6/27/13..............  AR.............  Springdale.........  Springdale Muni....       3/7457      5/14/13  VOR RWY 18, Amdt 15B.
6/27/13..............  ID.............  Lewiston...........  Lewiston-Nez Perce        3/7488      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 12, Amdt 2.
                                                              County.
6/27/13..............  NC.............  Edenton............  Northeastern Rgnl..       3/7545      5/14/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 19, Amdt 2.
6/27/13..............  NC.............  Edenton............  Northeastern Rgnl..       3/7549      5/14/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 19, Orig.
6/27/13..............  RQ.............  Ponce..............  Mercedita..........       3/7660      5/10/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 12, Orig-A.
6/27/13..............  GA.............  Atlanta............  Hartsfield--Jackson       3/7662      5/10/13  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 27R, Amdt 3.
                                                              Atlanta Intl.
6/27/13..............  GA.............  Atlanta............  Hartsfield--Jackson       3/7664      5/10/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 8L, ILS RWY 8L (SA CAT I),
                                                              Atlanta Intl.                                  ILS RWY 8L (CAT II), ILS RWY 8L (CAT III),
                                                                                Amdt 4.
6/27/13..............  GA.............  Atlanta............  Hartsfield--Jackson       3/7665      5/10/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 9R, ILS RWY 9R (SA CAT I),
                                                              Atlanta Intl.                                  ILS RWY 9R (CAT II), ILS RWY 9R (CAT III),
                                                                                Amdt 18.
6/27/13..............  IN.............  Angola.............  Tri-State Steuben         3/7679      5/13/13  NDB RWY 5, Amdt 7.
                                                              County.
6/27/13..............  IN.............  Angola.............  Tri-State Steuben         3/7680      5/13/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Orig-A.
                                                              County.
6/27/13..............  FL.............  Vero Beach.........  Vero Beach Muni....       3/7748      5/14/13  VOR RWY 11R, Amdt 14.
6/27/13..............  GA.............  Jefferson..........  Jackson County.....       3/7750      5/10/13  VOR/DME RWY 35, Amdt 2.
6/27/13..............  GA.............  Jefferson..........  Jackson County.....       3/7751      5/10/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Amdt 2.
6/27/13..............  GA.............  Jefferson..........  Jackson County.....       3/7752      5/10/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 2.
6/27/13..............  MD.............  Frederick..........  Frederick Muni.....       3/7770      5/10/13  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 23, Orig-C.
6/27/13..............  NJ.............  Atlantic City......  Atlantic City Intl.       3/7820      5/14/13  RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 13, Orig-A.
6/27/13..............  NJ.............  Atlantic City......  Atlantic City Intl.       3/7822      5/14/13  RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 31, Orig-A.
6/27/13..............  AK.............  Soldotna...........  Soldotna...........       3/7899      5/16/13  VOR/DME A, Amdt 7B.
6/27/13..............  MO.............  Osage Beach........  Grand Glaize- Osage       3/8153      5/14/13  VOR RWY 32, Amdt 6.
                                                              Beach.
6/27/13..............  MO.............  Camdenton..........  Camdenton Memorial.       3/8171      5/13/13  VOR A, Amdt 5.
6/27/13..............  AK.............  Dillingham.........  Dillingham.........       3/8215      5/16/13  VOR RWY 1, Amdt 9.
6/27/13..............  AK.............  Dillingham.........  Dillingham.........       3/8217      5/16/13  LOC/DME RWY 19, Amdt 6A.
6/27/13..............  AK.............  Dillingham.........  Dillingham.........       3/8218      5/16/13  VOR/DME RWY 19, Amdt 7.
6/27/13..............  AK.............  Dillingham.........  Dillingham.........       3/8219      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 19, Amdt 2.
6/27/13..............  AK.............  Fairbanks..........  Fairbanks Intl.....       3/8221      5/21/13  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 2L, Orig-B.
6/27/13..............  AK.............  Dillingham.........  Dillingham.........       3/8232      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 1, Amdt 2.
6/27/13..............  WA.............  Seattle............  Seattle-Tacoma Intl       3/8256      5/13/13  ILS RWY 34L, (SA CAT I & II), Amdt 1.
6/27/13..............  IL.............  Belleville.........  Scott AFB/                3/8492      5/14/13  ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 32L, Amdt 1.
                                                              MidAmerica.
6/27/13..............  AZ.............  Phoenix............  Phoenix Sky Harbor        3/8524      5/16/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 25L, Amdt 1F.
                                                              Intl.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Palm Springs.......  Palm Springs Intl..       3/8527      5/16/13  Takeoff Minimums and (Obstacle) DP, Amdt 5.
6/27/13..............  AK.............  Cold Bay...........  Cold Bay...........       3/8534      5/16/13  RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, Amdt 2.

6/27/13..............  AK.............  Cold Bay...........  Cold Bay...........       3/8535      5/16/13  LOC/DME BC RWY 33, Amdt 10.
6/27/13..............  WI.............  Milwaukee..........  Lawrence J                3/8568      5/14/13  Takeoff Minimums and (Obstacle) DP, Amdt 1.
                                                              Timmerman.
6/27/13..............  KS.............  Ulysses............  Ulysses............       3/8569      5/14/13  Takeoff Minimums and (Obstacle) DP, Amdt 2A.
6/27/13..............  NE.............  Sidney.............  Sidney Muni/Lloyd         3/8570      5/14/13  VOR/DME OR TACAN RWY 13, Amdt 5.
                                                              W. Carr Field.
6/27/13..............  NE.............  Sidney.............  Sidney Muni/Lloyd         3/8571      5/14/13  VOR/DME OR TACAN RWY 31, Amdt 5.
                                                              W. Carr Field.
6/27/13..............  OH.............  Toledo.............  Toledo Express.....       3/9108      5/15/13  VOR/DME RWY 34, Amdt 7A.
6/27/13..............  OH.............  Toledo.............  Toledo Express.....       3/9109      5/15/13  RADAR-1, Amdt 19A.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Redding............  Redding Muni.......       3/9263      5/16/13  ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 34, Amdt 11A.
6/27/13..............  CA.............  Redding............  Redding Muni.......       3/9264      5/16/13  VOR RWY 34, Amdt 10D.
6/27/13..............  MI.............  Lansing............  Capital Region Intl       3/9410       5/8/13  ILS OR LOC RWY 28L, Amdt 26B.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2013-13364 Filed 6-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3470-3471]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1366]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP12-308-000.
    Applicants: Golden Pass Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Golden Pass Pipeline LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: GPPL FERC Gas Tariff Cleanup filing to be effective 3/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 1/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120112-5126.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/24/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-309-000.
    Applicants: Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Request for Limited Waiver of Kern River Gas
Transmission Company.
    Filed Date: 1/11/12.
    Accession Number: 20120111-5257.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/23/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-310-000.
    Applicants: Gas Transmission Northwest LLC.
    Description: Gas Transmission Northwest LLC Submission of Refund
Report.
    Filed Date: 1/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120113-5023.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/25/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-311-000.
    Applicants: Central New York Oil And Gas, LLC.
    Description: Joint Facilities Filing in Compliance with Order in
Docket No. CP10-480-000 to be effective 12/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 1/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120113-5060.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/25/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-312-000.
    Applicants: Dogwood Energy LLC, Missouri Joint Municipal Electric
Util., City of Independence, Missouri, Kansas Power Pool, Kansas City
Board of Public Utilities.
    Description: Request of Dogwood Energy, LLC, Missouri Joint
Municipal Electric Utility Commission, the City of Independence,
Missouri, Kansas Power Pool and Kansas City Board of Public Utilities
for Temporary Waiver.

    Filed Date: 1/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120113-5192.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/25/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-313-000.
    Applicants: Sea Robin Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sea Robin Pipeline Company, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.203: Compliance with RP09-995-000 and RP10-422-000 to be
effective 8/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 1/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120113-5201.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/25/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-314-000.
    Applicants: Questar Overthrust Pipeline Company.
    Description: Questar Overthrust Pipeline Company submits tariff
filing per 154.204: Non-conforming TSAs V. 1.0.0 to be effective 2/17/
2012.
    Filed Date: 1/17/12.
    Accession Number: 20120117-5104.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/30/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-315-000.
    Applicants: Questar Southern Trails Pipeline Company.
    Description: Questar Southern Trails Pipeline Company submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Statement of Negotiated Rates V. 2.0.0 to be
effective 2/17/2012.
    Filed Date: 1/17/12.
    Accession Number: 20120117-5108.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/30/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-316-000.
    Applicants: White River Hub, LLC.
    Description: White River Hub, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Non-conforming TSAs V. 1.0.0 to be effective 2/17/2012.
    Filed Date: 1/17/12.
    Accession Number: 20120117-5110.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/30/12.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP12-263-001.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.205(b): Amended Negotiated Rate Filing--CIMA to be effective 1/
1/2012.
    Filed Date: 1/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120112-5058.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/24/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-264-001.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.205(b): Amended Negotiated Rate Filing--Concord to be effective
1/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 1/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120112-5060.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/24/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-266-001.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.205(b): Amended Negotiated Rate Filing--MIECO to be effective
1/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 1/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120112-5059.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/24/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-293-001.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.205(b): Amended Negotiated Rate Filing--United Energy Trading
to be effective 1/7/2012.
    Filed Date: 1/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120112-5062.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/24/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP06-298-015.
    Applicants: Public Service Commission of New York v.
    Description: Semi-Annual Report of Operational Sales of Gas filed
by National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation under RP06-298.
    Filed Date: 1/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120113-5177.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/25/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1873-001.
    Applicants: Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company submits tariff
filing per 154.203: Creditworthiness Compliance RP11-1873 to be
effective 4/7/2011.
    Filed Date: 1/13/12.
    Accession Number: 20120113-5176.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/25/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-233-001.
    Applicants: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company, LLC
submits tariff filing per 154.203: Compliance Filing--Discount Type
Adjustment for Negotiated Rate Agreements to be effective 1/12/2012.
    Filed Date: 1/17/12.
    Accession Number: 20120117-5090.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/30/12.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, and service can be found at:
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other
information, call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-
8659.

    Dated: January 17, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-1366 Filed 1-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: December 24, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 246)]
[Notices]
[Page 68420-68421]
[DOCID:fr24de09-19]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12660-002]

TDX Power Services, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Competing Applications

December 17, 2009.
    On November 3, 2009, TDX Power Services, LLC filed an application
for a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power
Act, proposing to study the feasibility of the Chakachamna
Hydroelectric Project (Chakachamna Project or project), located on
Chakachamna Lake, a natural lake, and the Chakachatna and MacArthur
rivers about 40 miles west of the Native Village of Tyonek and 82 miles
west of Anchorage in the Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska. The sole
purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the permit
holder priority to file a license application during the permit term. A
preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder to perform any
land disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands or waters
owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed project would utilize the existing Chakachamna Lake
and consist of the following: (1) A proposed 200-foot-long, 9-foot-high
concrete flow-control weir at the natural lake outlet for the purpose
of helping to control lake storage and downstream flow releases; (2) a
proposed 26-foot-diameter submerged intake structure on Chakachamna
Lake with a vertical shaft for gate control, located about 0.5 mile
west-southwest of the natural lake outlet; (3) a proposed 10.8-mile-
long, 21-foot-diameter hard-rock tunnel extending southeast from the
intake to the powerhouse; (4) a proposed underground cavern-type
powerhouse about 60 feet wide by 200 feet long housing three vertical
axis Francis units with a total installed capacity of 300 megawatts;
(5) a proposed 1,000-foot-long tailrace tunnel connecting the
powerhouse to the MacArthur River; (6) a proposed 21-foot-diameter,
13,800-foot-long tunnel housing separate juvenile and adult fish
passage channels and an access road--the tunnel would extend generally
east from Chakachamna Lake to the Chakachatna River at a location about
1.5 miles downstream of the flow-control weir; (7) a proposed pool-and-
chute fishway at the flow-control weir to facilitate upstream fish
passage into Chakachamna Lake; (8) two proposed, 42-mile-long, 230-
kilovolt (kV) transmission lines extending from the powerhouse to the
Beluga substation; (9) an existing approximately 10-mile-long access
road extending west from Cook Inlet to a point near Shirleyville; (10)
an existing 20-mile-long access road extending west-northwest from near
Shirleyville to the ``Straight Creek Crossing;'' (11) a proposed 20-
mile-long access road extending from the Straight Creek Crossing to the
intake; (12) a proposed 15-mile-long access road extending from the 20-
mile-long access road to the powerhouse; (13) a proposed buried, 25-kV
power cable extending 22 miles from the powerhouse to the intake and a
proposed buried, 25-kV power cable extending from the powerhouse to
adjacent camp facilities for workers; and (14) appurtenant facilities.
The project would have an estimated average annual generation of 1,330
gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Nicholas Goodman, Manager, TDX Power Services,
LLC, 4300 B Street, Suite 402, Anchorage, AK 99503; Phone: (907) 278-
2312; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    FERC Contact: Nick Jayjack; Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed

electronically, documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an
original and eight copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. For more information on how to submit these types
of filings please go to the Commission's Web site located at http://
www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project,
including a copy of the application, can be viewed or printed on the
``eLibrary'' link of the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/
docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-12660-002) in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, call toll-
free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-30578 Filed 12-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69311-69313]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28831]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-65669; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2011-78]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Offering a Market
Data Product to Vendors and Subscribers That Combines Three Existing
Market Data Feeds as Well as Additional Market Data From the Exchange
Into One Integrated Product, the NYSE Arca Integrated Data Feed

November 2, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 26, 2011, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSEArca'' or the ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to offer a market data product to vendors and
subscribers that combines three existing market data feeds as well as
additional market data from the Exchange into one integrated product,
the NYSE Arca Integrated Data Feed. The text of the proposed rule
change is available at the Exchange, the Commission's Public Reference
Room, and http://www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to offer a market data product to vendors and
subscribers that combines three existing market data feeds as well as
additional market data from the Exchange into one integrated product,
the NYSE Arca Integrated Data Feed. The three existing products, which
were previously approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') [sic] directly or became effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A), are: (1) NYSE Arca BBO,\3\ a service that makes available
the Exchange's best bids and offers; (2) NYSE Arca Trades,\4\ a service
that makes available NYSE Arca last sale information on a real-time
basis; and (3)

ArcaBook,\5\ a compilation of all limit orders resident in the NYSE
Arca limit order book. In addition, the NYSE Arca Integrated Data Feed
would include the following types of market data, which are currently
available through existing market data products: order imbalance
information prior to the opening and closing of trading \6\ and
security status information (i.e., delayed openings and trading
halts).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62188 (May 27,
2010), 75 FR 31484 (June 3, 2010) (SR-NYSEArca-2010-23).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59598 (March 18,
2009), 74 FR 12919 (March 29, 2009) (SR-NYSEArca-2009-05).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63291 (November 9,
2010), 75 FR 70311 (November 17, 2010).
    \6\ The Exchange's affiliates, the New York Stock Exchange, LLC
(``NYSE'') and NYSE Amex, LLC, currently offer imbalance data feed
products pursuant to proposed rule changes filed with the
Commission. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60153 (June 19,
2009), 74 FR 30656 (June 26, 2009) (SR-NYSE-2009-49) (order
approving proposed rule change) [sic]; and Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 60151 (June 19, 2009), 74 FR 30653 (June 26, 2009) (SR-
NYSEAmex-2009-29).
    \7\ The Commission previously approved the NYSE Alerts data feed
for NYSE, which includes delayed opening and trading halt data. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50844 (December 13, 2004), 69 FR
76806 (December 22, 2004) (SR-NYSE-2004-53).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to offer the NYSE Arca Integrated Data Feed
through the Exchange's Liquidity Center Network (``LCN''), a local area
network in the Exchange's Mahwah, New Jersey data center that is
available to Users of the Exchange's co-location services. The Exchange
also would offer the NYSE Arca Integrated Data Feed through the
Exchange's Secure Financial Transaction Infrastructure (``SFTI'')
network, through which all other Users and member organizations access
the Exchange's trading and execution systems and other proprietary
market data products.
    Offering an integrated product addresses requests received from
vendors and subscribers that would like to receive the data described
above in an integrated fashion. An integrated data feed would provide a
lower latency solution to those vendors and subscribers that are
interested in receiving market data as quickly as possible. In
addition, an integrated data feed would provide greater efficiencies
and reduce errors for vendors and subscribers that currently choose to
integrate the data after receiving it from the Exchange. The Exchange
believes that providing vendors and subscribers with the option of a
market data product that both integrates existing products and includes
additional market data would allow vendors and subscribers to choose
the best solution for their specific businesses.
2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) \8\ of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''), in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\9\ in particular, in that it is
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest, and it is not designed to
permit unfair discrimination among customers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In adopting Regulation NMS, the Commission granted self-regulatory
organizations (``SROs'') and broker-dealers increased authority and
flexibility to offer new and unique market data to consumers of such
data. It was believed that this authority would expand the amount of
data available to users and consumers of such data and also spur
innovation and competition for the provision of market data. The
Exchange believes that the NYSE Arca Integrated Data Feed is precisely
the sort of market data product that the Commission envisioned when it
adopted Regulation NMS. The Commission concluded that Regulation NMS--
by lessening regulation of the market in proprietary data--would itself
further the Act's goals of facilitating efficiency and competition:
    Efficiency is promoted when broker-dealers who do not need the data
beyond the prices, sizes, market center identifications of the NBBO and
consolidated last sale information are not required to receive (and pay
for) such data. The Commission also believes that efficiency is
promoted when broker-dealers may choose to receive (and pay for)
additional market data based on their own internal analysis of the need
for such data.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005),
70 FR 37496 (June 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange further notes that the existence of alternatives to
the Exchange's product, including real-time consolidated data, free
delayed consolidated data, and proprietary data from other sources, as
well as the continued availability of the Exchange's separate data
feeds, ensures that the Exchange is not unreasonably discriminatory
because vendors and subscribers can elect these alternatives.
    The NYSE Arca Integrated Data Feed will help to protect a free and
open market by providing additional data to the marketplace and give
investors greater choices. In addition, the proposal would not permit
unfair discrimination because the product will be available to all of
the Exchange's customers and broker-dealers through both the LCN and
SFTI.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The market for proprietary
data products is currently competitive and inherently contestable
because there is fierce competition for the inputs necessary to the
creation of proprietary data. Numerous exchanges compete with each
other for listings, trades, and market data itself, providing virtually
limitless opportunities for entrepreneurs who wish to produce and
distribute their own market data. This proprietary data is produced by
each individual exchange, as well as other entities (such as
internalizing broker-dealers and various forms of alternative trading
systems, including dark pools and electronic communication networks),
in a vigorously competitive market. It is common for market
participants to further and exploit this competition by sending their
order flow and transaction reports to multiple markets, rather than
providing them all to a single market.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of

investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2011-78 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2011-78. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSEArca-2011-78 and should be
submitted on or before November 29, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-28831 Filed 11-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Three (rotational) crops were subsequently planted in the treated and untreated soil at the following targeted intervals after the last application (plantback intervals).
Rotational Crop
Representation
Raw Agricultural Commodities
Targeted Plantback Intervals (days)
                                Root vegetables
                                  Root crops
                                  tops, roots
                                    7 - 30
                                   60 - 120
                                   300 - 365
                              Small grain cereals
                                 Cereal crops
                           forage, hay, grain, straw

                                    Soybean
                               Legume vegetables
          forage, hay, immature seeds with pod, mature shelled seeds

Sampling information:
For each targeted plantback interval, each rotational crop:
Treated plots:  Duplicate samples of immature or commercially mature specified commodities.
Untreated control plots:  Single samples of immature or commercially mature specified commodities.

Study #1 results - Residue analyses were conducted for parent plus metabolites IN-E8S72, IN-WR791, IN-RDG40, IN-Q7H09, IN-SXS67, IN-RZB20 and IN-RZD74.  The residue data demonstrated the following:
   * Average IN-Q7H09, IN-RDG40, IN-RZB20, IN-RZD74, and IN-WR791 residues are <LOQ (0.01 ppm) in all rotational crop commodities at all PBIs.
   * With the exception of soybean forage (maximum residue of 0.033 ppm at the 560 g ai/ha seasonal rate), average oxathiapiprolin residues were <LOQ in all commodities.
   * Average IN-E8S72 residues in rotational crop commodities range from <LOQ in several commodities up to 0.16 ppm in soybean hay (at PBIs ranging from 7-30 days) at the 560 g ai/ha rate (maximum seasonal rate).
   * Average IN-SXS67 residues in rotational crop commodities range from <LOQ in several commodities up to 0.090 ppm in cereal grain hay (at PBIs ranging from 7-30 days) at the 560 g ai/ha rate (maximum seasonal rate).

Field Rotational Crop Study #2 (MRID 49011245) - Study Design
Application information:
Bare soil was treated with these targeted conditions:
Formulation:  Oxathiapiprolin 100 g/L OD (DPX-QGU42-203) or
Oxathiapiprolin 200 g/L SC (DPX-QGU42-213) (Trial 31 only)
Trt 2: 2 applications, 2 oz ai/A (57 g ai/A, 140 g ai/ha, 0.126 lb ai/A) per application, 7-day retreatment interval.
Adjuvants were included for these soil applications.
No test substance was applied to untreated control plots.
Prior to rotational crop planting, the plots were tilled.
Rotational crops were subsequently planted in the treated and untreated soil at the following targeted intervals after the last application (plantback intervals).
Rotational Crop
Crop Group
Representation
Raw Agricultural Commodities
Targeted Plantback Interval (days)
                                  Sugar Beet
                                       2
                      Leaves of Root and Tuber Vegetables
                                     Tops
                                     5-10
                                    Lettuce
                                      4A
                      Leafy Vegetables (except Brassica)
                            Immature leaves, leaves

                                    Celery
                                      4B

                               Petioles (stalk)

                                Mustard Greens
                                      5B
                                   Brassica
                                    Leaves

                                    Soybean
                                     6, 7
                                    Legumes
             R6 Immature pod,
R6 Immature seed, forage, hay, seed

                                  Corn, Sweet
                                    15, 16
                   Cereal Grains, Forage, Fodder, and Straw
          Forage, ears (kernels plus cob with husks removed), stover

                                  Corn, Field

       Forage, ears (immature grain plus cob with husks removed), stover

                                    Sorghum

                                Forage, stover

                                     Wheat

                              Forage, hay, straw

                                    Canola
                                      20A
                                    Oilseed
                                     Seed

                                  Strawberry
                                    13-07G
                            Berries and Small Fruit
                                    Berries

Sampling information:
For each targeted plantback interval, each rotational crop had:
Treated plots:  duplicate samples of immature or commercially mature specified commodities.
Untreated control plots:  single samples of immature or commercially mature specified commodities.

Study #2 Results - Residue analyses were conducted for parent plus metabolites IN-E8S72, IN-WR791, IN-RDG40, IN-Q7H09, IN-SXS67, IN-RZB20 and IN-RZD74.  The residue data demonstrated the following in rotational crops grown in fields previously treated with oxathiapiprolin following 2 applications of oxathiapiprolin at 140 g ai/ha (0.126 lb ai/A) for a seasonal application rate of 280 g ai/ha (0.251 lb ai/A; 0.5X the maximum seasonal use rate):
   * Average oxathiapiprolin, IN-Q7H09, IN-RDG40, IN-RZB20, and IN-RZD74 residues are <0.010 ppm in all rotational crop commodities at all PBI.
   * Average IN-WR791 residues are 0.012 ppm in all rotational crop commodities.
   * Average IN-E8S72 and IN-SXS67 residues in rotational crop commodities range from ND (<0.003 ppm) in several commodities up to 0.30 ppm in wheat hay at a 5-9 day PBI.
Proposed Plant Back Interval Restrictions (Directly from the Proposed Labels)
 Crop, Crop Group, or Crop Subgroup*
Plantback Restriction (in Days) following Last Application
Root and Tuber Vegetables (Group 1)
                                                                              0
Bulb Vegetables (Group 3-07)
                                                                              0
Leafy vegetables (Group 4)
                                                                              0
Brassica Vegetables (Group 5)
                                                                              0
Peas, succulent
                                                                              0
Fruiting Vegetables (Group 8-10)
                                                                              0
Cucurbit Vegetables (Group 9)
                                                                              0
Strawberries
                                                                              0
Herbs and Spices (Group 19)
                                                                              0
Oilseed (Group 20)
                                                                              0
Ginseng
                                                                              0
Tobacco
                                                                             30
Cereals (Group 15, 16)
                                                                             30
Grass animal feeds (Group 17)
                                                                            180
Legume Vegetables  except succulent peas (Group 6)
                                                                            180
Non-grass Animal feed (Group 18)
                                                                            180
Peanuts
                                                                            180
All other crops not listed
                                                                           180
*Crop, Crop Group, or Crop Subgroup is given as listed on the proposed labels.

Conclusions.  Based on the residue definition for rotational crops being defined as parent oxathiapiprolin only, the submitted field rotational crop study data is adequate and the PBIs listed on the proposed labels are considered sufficient.  Due to the lack of toxicity from oxathiapiprolin, USEPA would normally grant a tolerance exemption for this chemical.  However, given that this chemical is being assessed as part of a global joint review and is intended to be registered in additional countries, the Agency is setting tolerances for harmonization purposes.  Given that tolerances are being set solely for the purposes of harmonization with global partners, HED has concluded that it is appropriate to align the residue of concern for tolerance enforcement with the global partners.  PMRA has set the residue of concern as parent oxathiapiprolin only in rotational crops and will be setting a generic action MRL of 0.10 ppm on all crops not currently proposed on the label.  This generic action MRL of 0.10 ppm will be used to provide coverage for inadvertent residues in rotational crops.  HED concludes that this approach is adequate for the purposes of tolerance enforcement in rotational crops and that this aligned approach will avoid future trade irritants with global partners.

5.3.3	Processed Food and Feed (860.1520)

MRID 49011237 Grape
MRID 49011238 Potato
MRID 49011239 Tomato

Processing studies in grape, potato, and tomato were submitted with the petition.

Grape

In the submitted grape processing study, four separate field trials were conducted, with two in Northern EU (NEU) and two in Southern EU (SEU).  Three trials were conducted at ~1.2X the proposed maximum seasonal use rate, whereas the fourth trial was conducted at ~4.5X the proposed maximum seasonal use rate.  Samples were assayed for residues of oxathiapiprolin and associated metabolites according to the method described in Section 5.1.1, and the residue results are supported by adequate storage stability data.  Overall, consistent residue behavior was found in these NEU and SEU trials, providing data appropriate for assessing residues and processing factors through processing (Appendix J).  It is noted that the GAP proposed PHI is 14 days, whereas these processing field trials were conducted at a 19-21 day PHI.  Despite this mismatch, these data are considered adequate for the purpose of evaluating the concentration of residues in grape processed commodities.
Each processed grape commodity (wine, juice, and raisin) showed a predictable residue profile consistent with the physical-chemical properties of oxathiapiprolin and with the loss of water to produce some commodities.  Oxathiapiprolin residues concentrated in raisins (average processing factor of 2) relative to the raw fruit and reduced in juice, red wine, and white wine relative to the raw fruit, with average processing factors of 0.17, 0.14, and 0.13, respectively (Appendix J).
Grape Conclusions.

The submitted grape processing study data is adequate for assessing the concentration of residues in processed commodities.  Based on the above results, oxathiapiprolin residues are not expected to concentrate in grape juice or wine.  Residues of oxathiapiprolin may concentrate in raisin.  A tolerance value of 0.62 ppm (i.e., 0.41 ppm (HAFT) x 1.5 (median PF) = 0.62 ppm) is calculated for raisin.  However, as this value is less than the recommended tolerance for grape (0.70 ppm), HED does not recommend in favor of a tolerance for raisin.

Potato

The target study design for the submitted potato processing study included at-plant and mid-season applications at a very exaggerated rate (1400 g ai/ha) in addition to exaggerated (175 g ai/ha) late-season foliar applications resulting in a total seasonal application of 3500 g ai/ha.  After this processing study was conducted, the proposed GAP for potato was finalized with only 4 applications at 50 g ai/ha for a seasonal application of 200 g ai/ha (0.176 lb ai/A).  Hence, the potatoes for processing were treated at an exaggerated rate of ~17.5 for the season.  Three separate potato processing trials were conducted with this target study design, with the actual use rates resulting in exaggerated rates of 17.8-18.8x compared to GAP.  Samples were assayed for residues of oxathiapiprolin and associated metabolites according to the method described in Section 5.1.1 and the residue results are supported by adequate storage stability data.
Overall, consistent residue behavior was found for applications conducted according to the specified exaggerated use pattern consisting of both soil and foliar applications.  The data provided are adequate for assessing residues and processing factors through processing (see Appendix J for full details on deriving these processing factors).
Processed potato commodities showed a predictable residue profile consistent with the physical-chemical properties of oxathiapiprolin and with the loss of water to produce some commodities.  Oxathipiprolin concentrated in waste from the peeling processes (average/median processing factors of 1.6/1.1 and 1.4/0.4 for steam-peeling and abrasion-peeling, respectively), and being reduced or greatly reduced in all other commodities.  Average processing factors ranged from <0.1 to 0.3 per commodity for washed tubers, culls, steam-peeled tubers, abrasion-peeled tubers, potato dried flakes, potato chips, peeled French fries, unpeeled French fries, boiled unpeeled potatoes, boiled peeled potatoes, and microwaved unpeeled (baked) potatoes.

Potato Conclusions.
The submitted potato processing study data is adequate for assessing the concentration of residues in processed commodities.  In the 22 primary crop field trials for potato, which were conducted at the GAP proposed use rate and PHI, no quantifiable residues were observed in the potato RAC.  If one multiples the median PF for potato waste from steam by the HAFT for the potato RAC (<0.01 ppm x 1.1), one would obtain 0.011 ppm.  Given the lack of quantifiable residues in the primary crop potato field trial studies, this 0.011 ppm value for steam waste is conservative and likely an overestimate of residues in potato waste.  Therefore, separate tolerances in processed potato commodities are not required.  The potato RAC tolerance of 0.01 ppm, which is being set at the tolerance enforcement method LOQ, should adequately cover processed potato commodities.

Tomato

The submitted tomato processing study included three separate field trials.  The use pattern for these trials combined the soil application rate per season (0.62 lb ai/A, equivalent to 1x) with foliar application rate per application (0.62 lbs ai/A, 1.25x), for an overall seasonal application rate equivalent to 2.25x.  Samples were assayed for residues of oxathiapiprolin and associated metabolites according to the method described in Section 5.1.1, and the residue results are supported by adequate storage stability data.

Oxathipiprolin residues concentrated in sun-dried tomatoes and wet tomato pomace (median processing factors of 6.9 and 13, respectively), remained constant in paste (average processing factor of 1.0) and were reduced in puree, washed tomatoes, juice, and peeled and canned tomatoes, with average processing factors of 0.5, 0.5, 0.2, <0.04, and <0.03, respectively.  Please see Appendix J for more details on the derivation of these processing factors.

Tomato Conclusions.

The submitted tomato processing study data is adequate for assessing the concentration of residues in processed commodities.  Based on the above results, oxathiapiprolin is not expected to concentrate in tomato juice, paste, or puree  -  the commodities for which HED typically makes tolerance recommendations.  Residues of oxathiapiprolin may concentrate in wet pomace and sun-dried tomato.  Based on the tomato HAFT oxathiapiprolin residue of 0.31 ppm, the anticipated residue of oxathiapiprolin is 4.0 ppm in wet pomace and 2.1 ppm in dried tomato.  Although HED would not normally set tolerances in dried tomato, it is noted that the registrant has petitioned for a dried fruiting vegetable tolerance based on these results.  For simplicity purposes in tolerance setting, the anticipated residue in dried tomato of 2.1 ppm is rounded up to the HED-recommended value of 3.0 ppm, with this rounding to 3.0 ppm being consistent with OECD rounding guidelines.  Based on a review of the data and current policy on setting tolerances on non-standard processed commodities (ChemSAC minutes 04/01/2015), HED concludes that setting a tolerance value of 3.0 ppm for dried tomato would be appropriate.  Following the HED Processing Factor Focus Group (PFFG) Guidance Document (2014, in draft), this tolerance is recommended for harmonization.  It is noted that the setting of this dried tomato tolerance is consistent with the approach used for other recent global joint reviews (P. Savoia, D422374, 01/15/2015).  However, HED concludes that a crop group tolerance of 3.0 ppm for all dried fruiting vegetables is not appropriate, as our regulations do not currently permit setting a crop group processed commodity tolerance (ChemSAC minutes 04/01/2015).

5.3.4	Meat, Milk, Poultry and Eggs (860.1480)

As summarized in Table <IP_ADDRESS>, maximum reasonable dietary burdens (MRDBs) were calculated by for cattle, poultry, and swine based on the proposed tolerances and use pattern.  The estimated MRDBs are 0.260 ppm, 0.393 ppm, 0.100 ppm, and 0.100 ppm in dairy cattle, beef cattle, swine, and poultry, respectively.  These MRDB calculations include an assumption of tolerance level residues of 0.10 ppm in rotational crops, as well as the sole livestock feed items from the primary crop uses (potato culls and potato process waste).  Potato culls and potato process waste were assumed to be present at LOQ levels (0.01 ppm), which is a worst case scenario assumption.  Overall, HED considers these MRDBs to be very conservative.

TABLE <IP_ADDRESS>	Calculation of Dietary Burdens of Oxathiapiprolin Residues to Livestock.
                                   Feedstuff
                                    Type[1]
                                % Dry Matter[2]
                                   % Diet[2]
                          Recommended Tolerance (ppm)
                         Dietary Contribution (ppm)[3]
                                  Beef Cattle
Corn gluten feed
                                      CC
                                      40
                                      75
                                     0.10
                                     0.188
Corn gluten meal
                                      CC
                                      40
                                       5
                                     0.10
                                     0.013
Canola meal
                                      PC
                                      88
                                       5
                                     0.10
                                     0.006
Pineapple process residue
                                       R
                                      25
                                      10
                                     0.10
                                     0.040
Sorghum forage
                                       R
                                      35
                                       5
                                     0.10
                                     0.014
                                                                   TOTAL BURDEN
                                      --
                                      --
                                      100
                                      --
                                     0.260
                                 Dairy Cattle
Carrot culls
                                      CC
                                      12
                                      10
                                     0.10
                                     0.083
Sweet corn cannery waste
                                      CC
                                      30
                                      10
                                     0.10
                                     0.033
Corn gluten feed
                                      CC
                                      40
                                      25
                                     0.10
                                     0.063
Peanut meal
                                      PC
                                      85
                                      10
                                     0.10
                                     0.012
Lespedeza forage
                                      RR
                                      22
                                      40
                                     0.10
                                     0.182
Field pea vine
                                      RR
                                      25
                                       5
                                     0.10
                                     0.020
                                                                   TOTAL BURDEN
                                      --
                                      --
                                      100
                                      --
                                     0.393
                                     Swine
Barley grain
                                      CC
                                      88
                                      20
                                     0.10
                                     0.020
Rice grain
                                      CC
                                      88
                                      20
                                     0.10
                                     0.020
Sorghum grain
                                      CC
                                      86
                                      45
                                     0.10
                                     0.045
Field pea seed
                                      PC
                                      90
                                      15
                                     0.10
                                     0.015
                                                                   TOTAL BURDEN
                                      --
                                      --
                                      100
                                      --
                                     0.100
                                    Poultry
Rye grain
                                      CC
                                      88
                                      35
                                     0.10
                                     0.035
Barley grain
                                      CC
                                      88
                                      40
                                     0.10
                                     0.040
Field pea seed
                                      PC
                                      90
                                      20
                                     0.10
                                     0.020
Soybean seed
                                      PC
                                      89
                                       5
                                     0.10
                                     0.005
                                                                   TOTAL BURDEN
                                      --
                                      --
                                      100
                                      --
                                     0.100
1. R = Roughage; CC = Carbohydrate Concentrate; PC = Protein Concentrate.
2. Revisions of Feedstuffs in Table 1 of OPPTS Test Guideline 860.1000 and Guidance on Constructing Maximum Reasonably Balanced Diets (MRBD).; ChemSAC memorandum; 30 June 2008.
3. Contribution = ([tolerance / %DM] x %diet) for beef and dairy cattle.  Contribution = (tolerance x %diet) for poultry and swine.

Based on the low residues of oxathiapiprolin and all metabolites in the goat metabolism study, a cattle feeding study was not conducted.  The majority of the administered dose (>85%) was eliminated in the excreta.  Overall low residues of parent oxathiapiprolin and metabolites were observed in the other goat matrices, with a maximum residue of 0.129 ppm.  Given that the goat metabolism study was conducted at ~36X the anticipated dietary burden in ruminants, there is no expectation of finite residues in ruminant commodities and no ruminant tolerances have been proposed.

In the hen metabolism study, oxathiapiprolin and metabolites were readily eliminated in the excreta (including cage wash), where 95-100% of the dose was recovered.  Overall the highest residue observed in the other hen matrices was 0.014 ppm in liver for unresolved oxathiapiprolin hydroxy metabolites.  Parent oxathiapiprolin was the predominant residue across hen matrices.  Given that the hen metabolism study was conducted at ~174 the anticipated dietary burden of the proposed uses, there is no expectation of finite residues for poultry matrices and no poultry tolerances have been proposed at this time.

Conclusions.  At this time, based on the livestock metabolism studies and the anticipated livestock dietary burden, no detectable residues of oxathiapiprolin are expected in livestock commodities (category 6(a)3); therefore, there are no oxathiapiprolin-related residues expected in livestock commodities and HED concludes that tolerances for livestock commodities are unnecessary.

If future uses of oxathiapiprolin are requested on crops which serve as significant livestock feedstuffs, livestock feeding studies may be required.

5.3.5.	Food Handling (860.1460)

At this time, there are no food-handling establishment uses associated with oxathiapiprolin.

5.3.6	Water, Fish, and Irrigated Crops (860.1400)

At this time, there are no water, fish, or irrigated crop uses associated with oxathiapiprolin.

5.4	Food Residue Profile

The submitted residue chemistry studies were generally well conducted and are adequate for supporting regulatory conclusions, establishing appropriate tolerance levels for enforcement, and for purposes of risk assessment.  Analysis of residues can be accomplished through standard analytical techniques, and residues do not show any trends for dissipation during frozen storage.  With the exception of the potato field trials where no quantifiable oxathiapiprolin residues were observed, one or more field trials from all other primary crops had quantifiable oxathiapiprolin residues.  These oxathiapiprolin residues were generally substantially higher than any of the seven metabolites listed above.  The registrant also submitted a large amount of residue decline data which generally demonstrated that residues of oxathiapiprolin decrease with increasing PHI (results not presented here; see study specific MRID DERs for further details).  All residue study results are supported by adequate storage stability data and these field trial studies were conducted using the proposed analytical enforcement method.

Due to the lack of toxicity from oxathiapiprolin, USEPA would normally grant a tolerance exemption for this chemical.  However, given that this chemical is being assessed as part of a global joint review and is intended to be registered in additional countries, the Agency is setting tolerances for harmonization purposes.  Given that tolerances are being set solely for the purposes of harmonization with global partners, HED has concluded that it is appropriate to align the residue of concern for tolerance enforcement with the global partners.  PMRA has set the residue of concern as parent oxathiapiprolin only in rotational crops and will be setting a generic action MRL of 0.10 ppm on all crops not currently proposed on the label.  This generic action MRL of 0.10 ppm will be used to provide coverage for inadvertent residues in rotational crops.  HED concludes that this approach is adequate for the purposes of tolerance enforcement in rotational crops and that this aligned approach will avoid future trade irritants with global partners.

Also, if there are future uses on crops that are significant livestock feedstuffs, then livestock feeding studies may be necessary.

6.0	Tolerance Derivation

The recommended tolerance levels for RAC commodities were obtained using the OECD calculation procedures.  With the exception of grape and ginseng, average residues of oxathiapiprolin from field trials conducted according to the proposed label were used in the calculations.  Please see Table <IP_ADDRESS> for the GAP proposed use rates and PHI.

For the crop group tolerance calculations (fruiting vegetables, cucurbit vegetables, leafy greens, and Brassica vegetables), within each crop group, the residue levels between the representative commodities did not vary by more than 5-fold, indicating that crop-group tolerances are appropriate.  Residues from each representative commodity were used to get commodity-specific tolerance levels and the maximum commodity-specific tolerance within the crop group was selected as the recommended tolerance for the entire group.  The residue data and calculation procedure outputs for each representative commodity are included in Appendix M.

For the crop uses where both foliar and soil application methods are proposed (leafy greens, cucurbits, fruiting vegetables, tobacco), the proposed labels do not allow foliar and soil application methods to be used interchangeably within the same season.  Therefore, it is not appropriate to merge the field trial results from foliar and soil application methods.  The foliar application trials yielded higher residues than the soil application trials across commodities.  Therefore, the tolerances were derived using the foliar trials and these tolerances are protective of the residues observed in the soil application method field trials.

As discussed previously, in the case of grape, the EU trials conducted in 2010 and 2011 used a PHI of 9-11 days, whereas the proposed PHI is 14 days.  For tolerance derivation purposes, these 2010 and 2011 trials were combined with eight 2013 trials conducted at a PHI of 14-15 days.  The 2010 and 2011 residue data is similar to that of the 2013 trials, with the combined dataset being considered adequate to support the proposed tolerance.  Please see Table <IP_ADDRESS> for the GAP proposed use rates and PHI.

The registrant also submitted EU crop field trial data for the other EU proposed uses (see Table 3.3 for proposed EU use pattern; detailed field trial results not summarized here).  Specifically, additional EU trials were conducted with edible and inedible peel cucurbits, tomatoes, lettuce, and potato.  This EU crop field trial data is consistent with North American crop field trial data, with parent oxathiapiprolin being the predominant residue across the dataset and generally lower residues being observed in the EU field trial dataset.  Only the NAFTA field trial data was used in the tolerance calculations, with this NAFTA data being protective of the residues observed in the EU studies.

In the case of ginseng, the registrant submitted four field trials at the GAP proposed use rate and two field trials at ~2X the GAP.  The registrant indicated that this was done because ginseng is a multi-year crop, often being harvested only after multiple growing seasons.  Please see section 5.3.1 for further details on these trials.  For tolerance derivation purposes, the registrant has proposed using the residue data from the 2X trials and proportionally adjusting the residue data from the 1X trials (where side-by-side treatment was not undertaken) to be 2 times higher.  Using the 2X trial data, a tolerance of 0.40 ppm is derived.  However, based on a review of the data and consultation with the global partners, HED has concluded that using the 1X data is more appropriate for tolerance-setting, yielding a 0.15 ppm recommended tolerance.

In the case of Crop Group 8-10, Fruiting Vegetables, the registrant proposed excluding a tomato field trial (Trial 18) from the tolerance calculation.  If this trial is excluded, all representative commodities (bell pepper, non-bell pepper, and tomato) support a crop group tolerance of 0.20 ppm.  However, HED has decided not to exclude this trial from the tolerance derivation (see Section 5.3.1. for further details).  With the inclusion of Trial 18, the recommended tomato tolerance becomes 0.50 ppm and, consequently, the recommended Fruiting Vegetable Crop Group 8-10 tolerance becomes 0.50 ppm.  It is noted that if both small and standard tomato cultivars are included together in the tolerance calculations, the recommended tomato tolerance is 0.40 ppm (as presented in Appendix M).  However, Canada's PMRA has concluded that tolerance calculations must be conducted separately for small and standard tomato cultivars.  Using the 11 field trials for small tomato cultivars, they derived a 0.50 ppm tolerance.  While HED would not normally calculate a tomato tolerance in this manner, given that HED is setting tolerances solely for the purposes of harmonization with global partners, a value of 0.50 ppm is considered adequate.

As discussed previously (see section 5.3.3), separate tolerances in processed potato and grape commodities are not required.  Additionally, oxathiapiprolin is not expected to concentrate in tomato juice, paste, or puree  -  the commodities for which HED typically makes tolerance recommendations.  Residues of oxathiapiprolin may concentrate in wet pomace and sun-dried tomato.  Based on the tomato HAFT oxathiapiprolin residue of 0.31 ppm, the anticipated residue of oxathiapiprolin is 2.1 ppm in dried tomato.  Although HED would not normally set tolerances in dried tomato, it is noted that the registrant has petitioned for a dried fruiting vegetable tolerance based on these results.  For simplicity purposes in tolerance setting, the anticipated residue in dried tomato of 2.1 ppm is rounded up to the HED-recommended value of 3.0 ppm, with this rounding to 3.0 ppm being consistent with OECD rounding guidelines (ChemSAC minutes 04/01/2015).  Based on a review of the data and current policy on setting tolerances on non-standard processed commodities (ChemSAC minutes 04/01/2015), HED concludes that setting a tolerance value of 3.0 ppm for dried tomato would be appropriate.  Following the HED Processing Factor Focus Group (PFFG) Guidance Document (2014, in draft), this tolerance is recommended for harmonization.  It is also noted that the setting of this dried tomato tolerance is consistent with the approach used for other recent global joint reviews (P. Savoia, D422374, 01/15/2015).  However, HED concludes that a crop group tolerance of 3.0 ppm for all dried fruiting vegetables is not appropriate, as our regulations do not currently permit setting a crop group processed commodity tolerance (ChemSAC minutes 04/01/2015).

7.0	ChemSAC Reference

This memorandum was reviewed by the Chemistry Science Advisory Council (ChemSAC) on April 1, 2015 and has been revised to reflect the recommendations of that group.


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64829-64830]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27303]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AC19-42-000]

Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Filing

December 12, 2018.
    Take notice that on December 6, 2018, Colorado Interstate Gas
Company, L.L.C. filed a request for approval to use Account 439,
authorized by the Financial Accounting Standards Board.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion

to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the
website that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any
FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comments: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on December 26, 2018.

    Dated: December 12, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-27303 Filed 12-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P