[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 13 (Thursday, January 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3160-3161]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00980]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-93974; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2022-002]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Its Fee Schedule

January 13, 2022.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on January 4, 2022, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BZX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``BZX'') proposes to
amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to update its Fee Schedule for its equity
options platform (``BZX Options'') to reflect a recent change in
connection with the rates under its Customer Non-Penny Add Volume
Tiers. Specifically, the Exchange submitted a rule filing on August 2,
2021 to amend the Fee Schedule (``August Filing''),\3\ which, among
other things, amended the rates provided under the Customer Non-Penny
Add Volume Tiers to range from between $0.92 and $1.06 per contract
across five tiers, to between $0.90 and $1.05 across eight tiers. The
Exchange, however, inadvertently omitted to also update the rates
listed in the Standard Rates table of the Fees Schedule applicable to
Customer orders that add volume in Non-Penny Program Securities to
reflect the new rates provided under the Customer Non-Penny Add Volume
Tiers. The Exchange now proposes to update the rates listed in the
Standard Rates table for Customer orders that add volume in Non-Penny
Program Securities to reflect the rates applicable to such orders
provided under the Customer Non-Penny Add Volume Tiers, as adopted in
the August Filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92635 (August 11,
2021), 86 FR 46028 (August 17, 2021) (SR-CboeBZX-2021-055).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\4\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\5\ in particular, as it is
designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among its Members and

issuers and other persons using its facilities. The Exchange also
believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \6\ requirements that the rules of an
exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest,
and, particularly, is not designed to permit unfair discrimination
between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed change is reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory as it does not change the
fees or rebates assessed by the Exchange, but rather updates the rates
applicable to Customer orders that add volume in Non-Penny Program
Securities in the Standard Rates table to accurately reflect the rates
adopted in the August Filing for such orders under the Customer Non-
Penny Add Volume Tiers. As such, the proposed rule change is merely a
clarification in the Fees Schedule designed to more accurately reflect
the current rates for Customer orders that add volume in Non-Penny
Program Securities, thereby increasing transparency in the Fees
Schedule and reducing potential confusion regarding the appropriate
rates for such orders.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intramarket or intermarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because the proposed rule change merely provides a clarification in
Fees Schedule that is designed to more accurately reflect the current
rates for Customer orders that add volume in Non-Penny Program
Securities, thereby increasing transparency in the Fees Schedule and
reducing potential confusion regarding the appropriate rates applicable
to such orders without having any impact on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \7\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-
4 \8\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \9\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CboeBZX-2022-002 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2022-002. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
).Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2022-002 and should
be submitted on or before February 10, 2022.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-00980 Filed 1-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 60 (Thursday, March 28, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11642-11644]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05885]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0151; Product Identifier 2019-NE-04-AD; Amendment
39-19604; AD 2019-06-06]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; International Aero Engines AG Turbofan
Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
International Aero Engines AG (IAE) V2500 turbofan engine models. This
AD requires initial and repetitive borescope inspections (BSIs) of the
diffuser case M-flange and, if it fails the inspection, replacement of
the diffuser case with a part eligible for installation. This AD was
prompted by a crack found at the diffuser case M-flange during overhaul
inspection. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.

DATES: This AD is effective April 12, 2019.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 12,
2019.
    We must receive comments on this AD by May 13, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this final rule, contact
International Aero Engines AG, 400 Main Street, East Hartford, CT
06118; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet: http://fleetcare.pw.utc.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2019-0151.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0151; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Operations (phone:
800-647-5527) is listed above. Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Caufield, Aerospace Engineer,
ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:
781-238-7146; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We received a report that a crack at the diffuser case M-flange was
found during overhaul inspection. Analysis by IAE found that the cracks
were a result of pressure loads in the case wall combined with thermal
gradients in the M-flange. This condition, if not addressed, could
result in uncontained diffuser case rupture, damage to the engine, and
damage to the airplane. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed IAE Alert Non-Modification Service Bulletin (NMSB)
V2500-ENG-72-A0706, dated February 14, 2019. The NMSB describes
procedures for inspecting the diffuser case M-flange. This service
information is reasonably available because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

AD Requirements

    This AD requires initial and repetitive BSI of the diffuser case M-
flange and, if it fails the inspection, replacement of the diffuser
case with a part eligible for installation.

FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD without providing an opportunity for public comments prior to
adoption. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public
justifies waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule
because certain IAE V2500 turbofan engine models require inspection
within 250 cycles to prevent rupture of the diffuser case and damage to
the engine. Therefore, we find good cause that notice and opportunity
for prior public comment are impracticable. In addition, for the reason
stated above, we find that good cause exists for making this amendment
effective in less than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public
comment. However, we invite you to send any written data, views, or
arguments about this final rule. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number FAA-2019-
0151 and Product Identifier 2019-NE-04-AD at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this final rule. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
final rule because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this final rule.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 1,654 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
               Action                         Labor cost            Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Borescope inspection...............  1.8 work-hours x $85 per                 $0            $153        $253,062
                                      hour = $153.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the results of the inspection. We have
no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need this
replacement:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                    Action                                 Labor cost               Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement of the diffuser case..............  20 work-hours x $85 per hour =           $48,300         $50,000
                                                 $1,700.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs''
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to engines, propellers, and
associated appliances to the Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2019-06-06 International Aero Engines AG: Amendment 39-19604; Docket
No. FAA-2019-0151; Product Identifier 2019-NE-04-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective April 12, 2019.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to International Aero Engines AG (IAE) V2500-A1,
V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2525-D5, V2527-A5, V2527E-A5, V2527M-A5, V2528-
D5, V2530-A5, V2533-A5 turbofan engines.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7240, Turbine Engine
Combustion Section.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a crack found at the diffuser case M-
flange during overhaul inspection. We are issuing this AD to prevent
failure of the diffuser case. The unsafe condition, if not
addressed, could result in uncontained diffuser case rupture, damage
to the engine, and damage to the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    (1) For diffuser cases with a rear outer flange that is equal to
or greater than 20,000 cycles since new (CSN) on the effective date
of this AD, perform an initial borescope inspection (BSI) of zones
1, 2, and 3 of the diffuser case M-flange before accumulating the
BSI Within (Cycles) listed in Table 1 to paragraph (g)(1) of this
AD. Use the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs 2.A. through
2.G. for the appropriate engine model, of IAE Alert Non-Modification
Service Bulletin (NMSB) V2500-ENG-72-A0706, dated February 14, 2019,
to perform the inspection.

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR28MR19.000

    (2) For diffuser cases with a rear outer flange that have fewer
than 20,000 CSN on the effective date of this AD, perform an initial
BSI of zones 1, 2, and 3 of the diffuser case M-flange within 21,300
CSN, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs
2.A. through 2.G. for the appropriate engine model, of IAE Alert
NMSB V2500-ENG-72-A0706, dated February 14, 2019.
    (3) If no cracks are found, perform a repetitive BSI not to
exceed every 2,100 cycles since the previous BSI.
    (4) If cracks are found, remove the diffuser case and replace
with a part eligible for installation or repeat the BSI within the
intervals in either Table 2: Fly on Limits or Table 4: Fly on
Limits, as appropriate for the affected the engine model, of IAE
Alert NMSB V2500-ENG-72-A0706, dated February 14, 2019.

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

    You may take credit for the actions that are required by
paragraph (g)(1) and (2) of this AD, if you performed those actions
before the effective date of this AD using IAE V2500 Special
Instruction (SI) No. 350F-18, Rev. 1, dated December 17, 2018; IAE
V2500 SI No. 356F-18, Rev. 1, dated January 9, 2019; IAE V2500 SI
No. 372F-18, dated January 8, 2019; or IAE V2500 Special SI No. 04F-
19, dated January 14, 2019.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, ECO branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (j) of this AD. You may email your request
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(j) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Barbara Caufield,
Aerospace Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) International Aero Engines (IAE) Alert Non-Modification
Service Bulletin V2500-ENG-72-A0706, dated February 14, 2019.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For IAE service information identified in this AD, contact
International Aero Engines AG, 400 Main Street, East Hartford, CT,
06118; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet:
http://fleetcare.pw.utc.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Engine &
Propeller Standards Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA
01803. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on March 22, 2019.
Karen M. Grant,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-05885 Filed 3-27-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 31, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32379-32381]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11498]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2022-0121; FRL-9823-01-R3]

Air Plan Approval; Pennsylvania; 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard Nonattainment New Source Review Certification

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve this state implementation plan (SIP) revision that will fulfill
Pennsylvania's nonattainment new source review (NNSR) SIP element
requirement for the 2015 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS). This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act
(CAA).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before June 30, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2022-0121 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person

identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Justin Leary, Permits Branch (3AD10),
Air & Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Mr. Leary can also be reached via electronic
mail at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 8, 2021, the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) submitted a revision on
behalf of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Commonwealth or
Pennsylvania) for its SIP. The revision comprises the NNSR
Certification for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Pennsylvania is
certifying that the Commonwealth's federally approved nonattainment new
source review regulation in 25 Pennsylvania Code of Regulations (Pa.
Code) Chapter 127 applies statewide and covers the Philadelphia-
Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE nonattainment area for the 2015
ozone NAAQS. Pennsylvania asserts that its nonattainment new source
review program is at least as stringent as the requirements at 40 CFR
51.165, as amended by the final rule titled ``Implementation of the
2015 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Nonattainment
Area State Implementation Plan Requirements'' (SRR) for ozone and its
precursors. See 83 FR 62998 (December 6, 2018).

I. Background

    EPA promulgated a revised 8-hour ozone NAAQS of 0.070 parts per
million (ppm). 80 FR 65452 (October 26, 2015). Under EPA's regulation
at 40 CFR 50.19 the 2015 8-hour ozone standard is obtained when the
three-year average of the fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average
ambient air quality ozone concentration is less than or equal to 0.070
ppm.
    Upon promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, the CAA requires that
EPA designate as nonattainment any area that is violating the NAAQS
based on the three most recent years of ambient air quality data at the
conclusion of the designation process. The Philadelphia-Wilmington-
Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE nonattainment Area was designated
nonattainment and classified as a marginal nonattainment area for the
2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS on August 3, 2018. Based on initial
nonattainment designations for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS, as well as
the December 6, 2018, final SRR, Pennsylvania was required to develop a
SIP revision addressing specific CAA requirements for the Philadelphia
Area and submit to EPA a NNSR Certification SIP or SIP revision no
later than 36 months after the effective date of area designations for
the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS (i.e., August 3, 2021). See 83 FR 62998
(December 6, 2018). EPA's analysis of how this SIP revision addresses
the NNSR requirements for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS is provided in
Section II of this rulemaking action.

II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis

    This rulemaking action is specific to Pennsylvania's NNSR
requirements. NNSR is a preconstruction review permit program that
applies to new major stationary sources or major modifications at
existing sources located in a nonattainment area. The specific NNSR
requirements for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS are located in 40 CFR
51.160-165.
    The minimum SIP requirements for NNSR permitting programs for the
2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS are located in 40 CFR 51.165. See 40 CFR
51.1314. Under the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS NNSR SIP requirements, the
SIP for each ozone nonattainment area must contain NNSR provisions
that: (1) Set major source thresholds for oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) pursuant to 40
CFR 51.165(a)(1)(iv)(A)(1)(i)-(iv); (2) classify physical changes as a
major source if the change would constitute a major source by itself
pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(iv)(A)(3); (3) consider any significant
net emissions increase of NOX as a significant net emissions
increase for ozone pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(v)(E); (4) consider
certain increases of VOC emissions in extreme ozone nonattainment areas
as a significant net emissions increase and a major modification for
ozone pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(v)(F); (5) set significant
emissions rates for VOCs and NOX as ozone precursors
pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(x)(A)-(C) and (E); (6) contain
provisions for emissions reductions credits pursuant to 40 CFR
51.165(a)(3)(ii)(C)(1)-(2); (7) provide that the requirements
applicable to VOC also apply to NOX pursuant to 40 CFR
51.165(a)(8); (8) set offset ratios for VOC and NOX pursuant
to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(9)(i)-(iii) (renumbered as (a)(9)(ii)-(iv) under
the SIP Requirements Rule for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS); and (9) in
meeting emissions offset requirement of paragraph (a)(3), the emission
offsets obtained be for the same regulated NSR pollutant with the
exception of direct fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
emissions and emission of precursors of PM2.5 pursuant 40
CFR 51.165(a)(11).
    Pennsylvania's SIP approved NNSR program, established in the Pa.
Code Rule 25 Pa. Code Chapter 127--Construction, Modification,
Reactivation, and Operation of Sources, applies to the construction and
modification of major stationary sources in nonattainment areas. In its
October 30, 2017, SIP revision, Pennsylvania certifies that the version
of 25 Pa. Code Chapter 127 in the SIP is at least as stringent as the
Federal NNSR requirements for the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic
City, PA-NJ-MD-DE nonattainment area. EPA last approved revisions to
Pennsylvania's major NNSR SIP on February 22, 2019. In that action, EPA
approved Pennsylvania's NNSR program under the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS
and made PADEP's NNSR program consistent with Federal requirements. See
84 FR 5598 (February 22, 2019). The version of 25 Pa. Code Chapter 127
that is contained in the current SIP and covers the Philadelphia-
Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE nonattainment area and is
adequate to meet all applicable NNSR requirements for the 2015 8-hour
ozone NAAQS found in 40 CFR 51.165, and the SRR.

III. Proposed Action

    EPA's review of this material indicates that Pennsylvania's
submission fulfills the 40 CFR 51.1114 revision requirement, meets the
requirements of CAA sections 110 and 172 and the minimum SIP
requirements of 40 CFR 51.165. EPA is proposing to approve
Pennsylvania's SIP revision addressing the NNSR requirements for the
2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Philadelphia Area, which was submitted
on January 8, 2020. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues
discussed in this document. These comments will be considered before
taking final action.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action

merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this proposed rulemaking, approving Pennsylvania's
2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS Certification SIP revision for NNSR, does not
have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in
Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.

Adam Ortiz,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2022-11498 Filed 5-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


  U.S. Department of Labor  -  Occupational Safety and Health Administration
NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH (NACOSH) Heat Injury and Illness Prevention Work Group
                  Type of Meeting: NACOSH Work Group Meeting
NACOSH Heat Injury and Illness Prevention Work Group Agenda: September 12, 2022
Andy Levinson  -  Designated Federal Official -<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Long  -  Alternate Designated Federal Official -<EMAIL_ADDRESS>              Cynthia Lewis  -  NACOSH Chair -<EMAIL_ADDRESS>          Rebecca Reindel  -  Work Group Chair -<EMAIL_ADDRESS>          Kathleen Dobson  -  Work Group Chair -<EMAIL_ADDRESS>          Jennifer Levin  -  Committee Counsel -<EMAIL_ADDRESS>         Carla Marcellus  -  NACOSH Support -<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     NACOSH Work Group Agendas are subject to change without prior notice

1:00  -  1:05 PM
Welcome
Lisa Long, Alternate Designated Federal Official
Kathleen Dobson and Rebecca Reindel, Work Group Chairs
1:05  -  1:25 PM
Report out and discussion of Task #1  -  Recommendations on OSHA's Heat Illness Prevention Materials
Timeline and next steps to complete Task #1
Kathleen Dobson, Work Group Chair
1:25  -  1:40 PM
Presentation from OSHA on ANPRM Summary Document and National Emphasis Program
Zoe Petropoulos, Health Scientist
Larry McGowan, Supervisory Industrial Hygienist
1:40  -  1:50 PM
Timeline and next steps to complete Task #2 - Recommendations on Potential Elements of Heat Injury and Illness Prevention Rulemaking
Rebecca Reindel, Work Group Chair
1:50  -  2:00 PM
Discussion and presentation to NACOSH on September 13
Kathleen Dobson and Rebecca Reindel, Work Group Chairs


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 84 (Thursday, May 1, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24556-24558]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09421]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0031; Directorate Identifier 2013-CE-054-AD;
Amendment 39-17838; AD 2014-09-03]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; SOCATA Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 99-07-11 for
SOCATA Model TBM 700 airplanes. This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as cracks on the outboard hinge fittings. We are issuing this
AD to require actions to address the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: This AD is effective June 5, 2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of June 5, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0031; or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact SOCATA,
Direction des Services, 65921 Tarbes Cedex 9, France; telephone +33 (0)
5 62 41 73 00; fax +33 (0) 5 62 41 76 54, or for North America: SOCATA
NORTH AMERICA, North Perry Airport, 7501 South Airport Road, Pembroke
Pines, Florida 33023; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: www.mysocata.com. You may
view this referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to add an AD that would apply to certain SOCATA Model TBM 700
airplanes. The NPRM was published in the Federal Register on January
27, 2014 (79 FR 4300), and proposed to supersede AD 99-07-11, Amendment
39-11096 (64 FR 14820, March 29, 1999) (``AD 99-07-11'').
    Since we issued AD 99-07-11 (64 FR 14820, March 29, 1999), SOCATA
determined that the cause of the cracks in the horizontal stabilizer
outboard hinge fitting was due to the incorrect installation of the
fittings during production, which induced stress. SOCATA has issued new
mandatory service information to require a modification to the outboard
hinge fittings of the horizontal stabilizer to eliminate the stress.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued AD
No. 2013-0035, dated February 22, 2013 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:

    During the 1990s, several occurrences were reported of finding
cracks in the outboard hinge fittings of the horizontal stabiliser
on TBM 700 aeroplanes.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could result in
rupture of the outboard hinge fittings, which would adversely affect
the structural integrity of the horizontal stabiliser. The in-flight
loss of the horizontal stabiliser would result in reduced control of
the aeroplane,
    To address this unsafe condition, DGAC France issued AD 1999-
060(A), requiring repetitive inspections of the fittings and,
depending on findings, corrective action.
    After that AD was issued, SOCATA determined that the cause of
the cracks was a wrong installation of the fittings during
production, inducing stress. Consequently, DGAC France issued AD
2000-307(A), partially retaining the requirements of DGAC France AD
1999-060(A), which was superseded, and required, depending on
findings, that the installation of the fittings of in-service
aeroplanes be rectified by

introduction of adjusting shims, a modification which was introduced
as standard on the production line from MSN 162. The periodical
inspection of the fittings for cracks was still required, pending a
better understanding of the cause of the cracks.
    Since DCAG France AD 2000-307(A) was issued, the results of the
further analysis revealed that the final design (installation of
shims on the outboard hinge fittings of the horizontal stabiliser)
guarantees a service fatigue life which exceeds the one established
for the TBM 700 during certification. Consequently, for aeroplanes
with this modification, the repetitive inspections of the fittings
can be discontinued. However, as the installation of the fittings
was only required depending on findings, this modification may not
have been accomplished on all affected aeroplanes.
    For the reasons described above, this AD supersedes (and thereby
cancels the requirements of) DGAC France AD 2000-307(A) and requires
installation of shims on the outboard hinge fittings of the
horizontal stabiliser.

    You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0031-0002.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Incorporate Amended Service Bulletin

    DAHER-SOCATA requested that we incorporate Amendment 3 of Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB 70-080, dated September 2013, into the AD to
replace DAHER-SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-080,
Amendment 2, dated August 2012.
    We agree with the commenter to incorporate the newer version of the
related service information. We will also give credit for complying
with the actions in the proposed AD if already done before the
effective date of this AD following DAHER-SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB 70-080, Amendment 2, dated August 2012.
    We have changed the final rule AD action based on this comment.

Request To Change the Number of Affected Airplanes

    DAHER-SOCATA requested that we change the number of affected
airplanes in the Cost of Compliance section from 159 to 80, which is
the number of U.S.-registered airplanes.
    We agree with the commenter and have changed the final rule AD
action based on this comment.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (79 FR 4300, January 27, 2014) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 4300, January 27, 2014).

We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 80 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 6.5 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost
about $500 per product.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $84,200, or $1,052.50 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0031; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received,
and other information. The street address for the Docket Office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-11096 (64 FR
14820, March 29, 1999), and adding the following new AD:

2014-09-03 SOCATA: Amendment 39-17838; Docket No. FAA-2014-0031;
Directorate Identifier 2013-CE-054-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective June 5,
2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes AD 99-07-11, Amendment 39-11096 (64 FR 14820,
March 29, 1999).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to SOCATA TBM 700 airplanes, manufacturer serial
numbers (MSN) 1 through 98, 100 through 156, and 158 through 161,
certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 55: Stabilizers.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as cracks on the
outboard hinge fittings. We are issuing this AD to require the use
of new service information issued by DAHER-SOCATA to eliminate the
stress on the outboard hinge fittings, which is causing the cracks.
If this condition is not prevented, the outboard hinge fittings
could fail causing reduced structural integrity of the horizontal
stabilizer, which could result in reduced control.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, within the next 100 hours time-in-service
after June 5, 2014 (the effective date of this AD) or within the
next 12 months after June 5, 2014 (the effective date of this AD),
whichever occurs first, install shims on the outboard hinge fittings
of the horizontal stabilizer. Do the modification following the
Accomplishment Instructions in DAHER-SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB 70-080, Amendment 3, dated September 2013.

(g) Credit for Actions Done Following Previous Service Information

    This AD allows credit for the actions required in paragraph (f)
of this AD if done before June 5, 2014 (the effective date of this
AD), following DAHER-SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin
SB 70-080, Amendment 2, dated August 2012.

(h) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(i) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.
2013-0035, dated February 22, 2013, for related information. You may
examine the MCAI on the Internet http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0031-0002.

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) DAHER-SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-
080, Amendment 3, dated September 2013.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For SOCATA service information identified in this AD,
contact SOCATA, Direction des Services, 65921 Tarbes Cedex 9,
France; telephone +33 (0) 5 62 41 73 00; fax +33 (0) 5 62 41 76 54,
or for North America: SOCATA NORTH AMERICA, North Perry Airport,
7501 South Airport Road, Pembroke Pines, Florida 33023; telephone:
(954) 893-1400; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: www.mysocata.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April 17, 2014.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-09421 Filed 4-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 59672]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24763]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Change In IC Docket Numbering Policy

    Notice is hereby given that the Commission is modifying the
numbering system for the docket prefix IC. These IC docket notices
announce the Commission's efforts to have public involvement in its
information collection requirements prior to requesting and obtaining
approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
    The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35) requires
agencies to plan for the development of new collections of information
and the extension of existing collections of information far in advance
of sending them forward to OMB for approval. Advanced planning is
necessary because agencies must incorporate public participation in the
development of information collection requirements imposed on the
public. To achieve this public participation, the Commission must
``provide 60-day notice in the Federal Register, and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected agencies'' (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)). In these notices, the Commission must solicit comments
on the need for the information, its practical utility, the accuracy of
the Commission's burden estimate, and ways to minimize the burden,
including through ``the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology.''
    In addition, agencies must publish a notice in the Federal Register
stating that the proposed collection of information has been submitted
for OMB review. This is the second notice to appear in the Federal
Register and provides the public with a second opportunity to comment.
OMB must provide at least 30 days for public comment after receipt of
the Commission's submission and prior to making a decision.
    On December 30, 1997, the Commission adopted the current IC docket
prefix \1\ in order to properly track any comments it receives in
response to Federal Register notices concerning the Commission's
collections of information. In order to respond to current technical
and tracking needs of its information collections, the Commission is
revising the way the IC docket prefix is set up. Beginning on October
1, 2011, IC dockets will continue to be set up as ICFY-NNN-NNN.
However, the first ``NNN'' for new IC dockets will now be a sequential
number (rather than the collection or form number), as notices are
issued over the course of the fiscal year. In addition, the second
``NNN'' will now be ``000'' for both 60-day and 30-day notices. For
example, docket number IC12-1-000 would contain all material pursuant
to the extension of a single collection of information (rather than
material related to the FERC Form 1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Notice is available in eLibrary at http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/intermediate.asp?link_file=yes&doclist=3058091. The IC dockets were set up as ICFY-NNN-
NNN, where the FY stood for the fiscal year in which the notice was
issued, the first NNN represented an identifier for the Commission's
collection of information requirement, and the second NNN
represented either the first or second notice, with 000 to designate
a 60-day notice and 001 to designate a 30-day notice. For example,
IC07-2-000 represented the 60-day notice for the Commission
information collection FERC Form No. 2 during the fiscal year 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The RM docket prefix will continue to be used for rulemakings that
affect information collections.

    Dated: September 19, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-24763 Filed 9-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P