[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61684-61685]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25642]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC11-120-000.
    Applicants: PECO Energy Company, Exelon Generation Company, LLC.
    Description: Joint Application of PECO Energy Co. and Exelon
Generation Company LLC for Transaction Approval pursuant to the FPA,
Section 203.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5147.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
    Docket Numbers: EG11-128-000.
    Applicants: Record Hill Wind LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of EG of Record Hill Wind LLC.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5054.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER11-3614-003.
    Applicants: Glacial Energy Holdings.
    Description: Glacial Energy Holdings submits tariff filing per 35:
Substitute Market-Based Rate Filing to be effective 9/26/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5057.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4254-001.
    Applicants: New England Power Company.
    Description: New England Power Company submits tariff filing per
35.17(b): Amendment to Filing of Interconnection Agreement with Lowell
Cogeneration to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5121.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4320-001.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Arizona Public Service Company submits tariff filing
per 35.17(b): Service Agreement No. 174, Amendment Type Filing to be
effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5087.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4388-001.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits tariff filing per 35.17(b): ITCM Amendment to Cert. of
Concurrence to be effective 10/4/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5109.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4631-000.
    Applicants: Florida Power Corporation.
    Description: Florida Power Corporation submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: Florida Power Corporation Amendment of RS-2 Tariff to
be effective 9/26/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5037.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4632-000.
    Applicants: Southwestern Electric Power Company.
    Description: Southwestern Electric Power Company submits tariff
filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: 20110926 Bentonville PSA to be effective
12/17/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5038.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4633-000.
    Applicants: Madison Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Madison Gas and Electric Company submits tariff filing
per 35.1: Madison Gas and Electric Company Market-Based Rate Tariff
Baseline Filing to be effective 9/26/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5049.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4634-000.
    Applicants: Hazleton Generation LLC.
    Description: Hazleton Generation LLC submits tariff filing per
35.1: Hazleton Generation, LLC MBR to be effective 9/26/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5056.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4635-000.
    Applicants: Hardee Power Partners Limited.
    Description: Hardee Power Partners Limited submits tariff filing
per 35.1: Eighth Amendments to Agreements for Sale and Purchase of
Capacity and Energy to be effective 9/26/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5074.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4636-000.
    Applicants: Portland General Electric Company.
    Description: Portland General Electric Company submits tariff
filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: Colstrip Project Transmission Agreement to
be effective 1/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5085.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4637-000.
    Applicants: NorthWestern Corporation.
    Description: NorthWestern Corporation submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): Colstrip Transmission Agreement to be effective 1/1/
2012.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5090.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4638-000.
    Applicants: Merck & Co., Inc.
    Description: Merck & Co., Inc. submits tariff filing per 35.1:
Baseline Tariff Filing to be effective 9/25/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5091.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4639-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii):
Colstrip Project Transmission Agreement to be effective 1/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5098.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4640-000.
    Applicants: Akula Energy, LLC.
    Description: Akula Energy, LLC submits Notice of Cancellation of
its Market-Based Rate Tariff.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-0015.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4641-000.
    Applicants: New England Power Company.
    Description: New England Power Company submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): Cost Reimbursement Agreement with Granite Reliable
LLC to be effective 8/4/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5115.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4642-000.
    Applicants: Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
    Description: Puget Sound Energy, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.12: Colstrip TX Agreement Rate Schedule 143 to be effective 1/1/
2012.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5124.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4643-000.
    Applicants: Portland General Electric Company.
    Description: Portland General Electric Company submits tariff
filing per 35.12: REPSIA between PGE and BPA to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5127.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4644-000.
    Applicants: Idaho Power Company.
    Description: Idaho Power Company submits its Average System Cost
for sales of electric power to Bonneville Power Administration for
2012-2013 et al.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-0201.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 14, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4645-000.
    Applicants: Avista Corporation.
    Description: Avista Corporation submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): Avista Corp FERC Rate Schedule No. 190 to be
effective 1/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 09/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110926-5130.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 17, 2011.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 27, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-25642 Filed 10-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 214 (Monday, November 5, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55252-55255]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23690]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0027; Product Identifier 2017-NM-118-AD; Amendment
39-19482; AD 2018-22-09]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model 787 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by
reports that, under certain conditions, the automatic dependent
surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) out function and air traffic control/
traffic alert and collision avoidance system (ATC/TCAS) functions can
transmit incorrect data. This AD requires an inspection or records
review to determine if certain software is installed, the installation
of new software for the integrated surveillance system (ISS)
operational program software (OPS) if necessary, a software check, and
applicable on-condition actions. For certain airplanes, this AD also
requires the installation of new software for the ISS OPS, ISS option
selection software (OSS) file, and ISS airline selectable option (ASO)
file; and installation of a new ISS definition file database within the
displays and crew alerting (DCA) system. We are issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective December 10, 2018.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of December 10,
2018.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. It is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0027.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0027; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nelson O. Sanchez, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all The Boeing Company
Model 787 series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register
on February 9, 2018 (83 FR 5741). The NPRM was prompted by reports
that, under certain conditions, the ADS-B out function and ATC/TCAS
functions can transmit incorrect data. The NPRM

proposed to require an inspection or records review to determine if
certain software is installed, the installation of new software for the
ISS OPS if necessary, a software check, and applicable on-condition
actions. For certain airplanes, this AD also requires the installation
of new software for the ISS OPS, ISS OSS file, ISS ASO file, and
installation of a new ISS definition file database within the DCA
database system.
    We are issuing this AD to address the transmission of incorrect
position and pressure altitude data, which could result in potential
mid-air collisions.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment. The Air Line Pilots
Association, International (ALPA) expressed support for the NPRM.
United Airlines had no objection to the NPRM.

Request To Allow for Later-Approved Service Bulletins in Paragraph (h)

    American Airlines requested that we consider revising paragraph (h)
of the proposed AD to include later-approved service bulletins
regarding software loading. American said this change would eliminate
the need to obtain alternative methods of compliance (AMOCs) when
software is updated.
    We partially agree with the commenter's request. We cannot allow
operators to use later-approved revisions of the service bulletins,
since we may not refer to any document that does not yet exist in an
AD. To allow operators to use later revisions of service bulletins
(issued after publication of the AD), we must revise the AD to
reference specific later revisions, or operators must request approval
to use later revisions as an AMOC to the AD. However, we may allow for
later-approved software versions if they are approved as a replacement
for the applicable software, and are approved as part of the type
design by the FAA or the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) after issuance of the service bulletins
specified in this AD. Therefore, we have revised paragraph (h) of this
AD to allow for later-approved versions of the software. Since
paragraph (i) of this AD specifies a similar requirement for certain
airplanes, we have also revised paragraph (i) of this AD to allow for
later-approved software versions.

Request To Include Additional Software

    Boeing suggested that we revise the Summary section and ``Related
Service Information under 1 CFR part 51'' section of the NPRM and
paragraph (i) of the proposed AD to include the following additional
software: ISS OSS file, ISS ASO file, and installation of a new ISS
definition file database within the DCA system. Boeing asserted that
this would clarify which software may be impacted when considering all
configurations in service.
    We agree with the commenter's request. We have revised this final
rule accordingly. We have also added this same information to the
Discussion section of this final rule.

Request To Add Other Software Part Numbers to Paragraphs (g), (h), and
(j) of the Proposed AD

    Boeing suggested adding certain software part numbers to paragraphs
(g), (h), and (j) of the proposed AD. Boeing observed that although the
part numbers provided in the proposed AD represent the latest software
installed in production, additional software might still be installed
in-service. According to Boeing, the suggested additions would result
in updates to paragraphs (g), (h), and (j) of the proposed AD to
include all possible software part numbers.
    We partially agree with the commenter's request because software
part numbers COL40-0010-0010, COL41-0010-0011, and ISS SysIO OPS COL46-
0007-0010, identified by Boeing, also have the potential to transmit
incorrect data, which is the basis for the unsafe condition. However,
we disagree with the suggestion to include more software part numbers
because that would expand the scope of this AD and require a
supplemental NPRM (SNPRM) and re-opening of the comment period, thereby
delaying issuance of this final rule to address the identified unsafe
condition. We are considering additional rulemaking applicable to all
Boeing Model 787 airplanes to address the additional part numbers. This
AD has not been changed with regard to this request.

Request To Give Credit for Prior Accomplishment of Requirements

    Naftaly Wambugu requested that the FAA give credit to operators who
will have accomplished Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB340036-00, Issue 001, dated June 30, 2017, across their Boeing 787
fleet.
    We acknowledge the commenter's request and agree to clarify.
Paragraph (f) of this AD provides credit to operators who have already
accomplished the AD requirements, including those involving Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB340036-00, Issue 001, dated June
30, 2017, before the effective date of this AD. Therefore, this AD has
not been changed with regard to this request.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this final rule with the changes described previously and minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB340036-00,
Issue 001, dated June 30, 2017. This service information describes
procedures for the installation of new software for the ISS OPS (which
includes main input/output (IO) software and traffic transponder (XPDR)
airborne collision avoidance system (ACAS) software), a software check,
and applicable on-condition actions.
    We also reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB340005-00,
Issue 002, dated April 27, 2016. This service information describes
procedures for the installation of new software for the ISS OPS, ISS
OSS file, ISS ASO file, and for the ISS definition file database within
the DCA system.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 136 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that 115 airplanes will require installation and check of
new software, and 54 airplanes will require the concurrent installation
of other software. We estimate the following costs to comply with this
AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Records Review/Inspection (136          1 work-hour x $85 per                 $0             $85         $11,560
 airplanes).                             hour = $85.
Installation and Check (115 airplanes)  4 work-hours x $85 per                 0             340          39,100
                                         hour = $340.
Concurrent Installation (54 airplanes)  1 work-hour x $85 per                  0              85           4,590
                                         hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary on-condition
actions that would be required. We have no way of determining the
number of aircraft that might need these on-condition actions:

                 Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Cost per
              Labor cost                   Parts cost        product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 work-hours x $85 per hour = $340....              $0             $340
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all available costs in our
cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2018-22-09 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19482; Docket No. FAA-
2018-0027; Product Identifier 2017-NM-118-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective December 10, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 787 series
airplanes, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 34, Navigation.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports that under certain conditions
the automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) out and air
traffic control (ATC)/traffic alert and collision avoidance system
(TCAS) functions can transmit incorrect position and pressure
altitude information in the data that is used by ATC to coordinate
aircraft separation. We are issuing this AD to address the
transmission of incorrect position and pressure altitude data, which
could result in potential mid-air collisions.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspection or Records Review

    For airplanes that have an original certificate of airworthiness
or export certificate of airworthiness issued on or before the
effective date of this AD: Within 12 months after the effective date
of this AD, inspect to determine if integrated surveillance system
(ISS) operational program software (OPS) part number (P/N) COL40-
0010-0100 or COL46-0007-0100 is installed. A review of airplane
maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the
part number of the software can be conclusively determined from that
review.

(h) Required Actions

    If, during any inspection or records review required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, any ISS OPS P/N COL40-0010-0100 or COL46-
0007-0100 is found: Within 12 months after the effective date of
this AD, do all applicable actions identified as ``RC'' (required
for compliance) in, and in accordance with, the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB340036-
00, Issue 001, dated June 30, 2017; except where Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB340036-00, Issue 001, dated June 30,
2017, specifies installing software P/Ns COL41-0010-0101 and COL44-
0007-0102, this AD requires installing P/Ns COL41-0010-0101 and
COL44-0007-0102, or later-approved software versions. Later-approved
software versions are only those Boeing software versions that are
approved as a replacement for the applicable software, and are
approved as part of the type design by the FAA or the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA)
after issuance of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB340036-
00, Issue 001, dated June 30, 2017.

(i) Additional Actions for Group 1 Airplanes

    For Group 1 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB340036-00, Issue 001, dated June 30, 2017:
Prior to accomplishment of the actions required by paragraph (h) of
this AD, install new software for the ISS OPS, ISS option selection
software (OSS) file, and ISS airline selectable option (ASO) file;
and install a new ISS definition file database within the displays
and crew alerting (DCA) system; in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB340005-00, Issue 002, dated April 27, 2016; except where Boeing
Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB340005-00, Issue 002, dated April 27,
2016, specifies installing certain software, this AD requires
installing that software or later-approved software versions. Later-
approved software versions are only those Boeing software versions
that are approved as a replacement for the applicable software, and
are approved as part of the type design by the FAA or the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes ODA after issuance of Boeing Service Bulletin
B787-81205-SB340005-00, Issue 002, dated April 27, 2016.

(j) Parts Installation Prohibition

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install ISS
OPS part number COL40-0010-0100 or COL46-0007-0100 on any airplane,
except in accomplishment of the actions required by paragraph (i) of
this AD.

(k) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB340005-00, Issue 001, dated December 11, 2015.

(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (m)(1) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes ODA that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, to make those
findings. To be approved, the repair method, modification deviation,
or alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as RC, the provisions of paragraphs (l)(4)(i) and (l)(4)(ii) of this
AD apply.
    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.

(m) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Nelson O.
Sanchez, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Section, FAA,
Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
phone and fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].
    (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (n)(3) and (n)(4) of this AD.

(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB340036-00, Issue
001, dated June 30, 2017.
    (ii) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB340005-00, Issue 002,
dated April 27, 2016.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on October 22, 2018.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-23690 Filed 11-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 7, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 66)]
[Notices]
[Page 17755]
[DOCID:fr07ap10-69]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2010-0141]

Certificate of Alternative Compliance for the Offshore Supply
Vessel GULF TIGER

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces that a Certificate of Alternative
Compliance was issued for the offshore supply vessel GULF TIGER as
required by 33 U.S.C. 1605(c) and 33 CFR 81.18.

DATES: The Certificate of Alternate Compliance was issued on February
12, 2010.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this notice is available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this
docket on the Internet by going to http://www.regulations.gov,
inserting USCG-2010-0141 in the ''Keyword'' box, and then clicking
''Search.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice,
call CWO2 David Mauldin, District Eight, Prevention Branch, U.S. Coast
Guard, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background and Purpose

    A Certificate of Alternative Compliance, as allowed under Title 33
of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 81 and 89, has been issued
for the h offshore supply vessel GULF TIGER. Full compliance with 72
COLREGS and the Inland Rules Act would hinder the vessel's ability to
maneuver within close proximity of offshore platforms. Due to the
design of the vessel it would be difficult and impractical to build a
supporting structure that would put the side lights within 10% inboard
from the greatest breadth of the Vessel, as required by Annex I,
paragraph 3(b) of the 72 COLREGS and Annex I, Section 84.05(b), of the
Inland Rules Act. Compliance with the rule would cause the side lights
on the offshore supply vessel GULF TIGER to be in a location which will
be highly susceptible to damage from offshore platforms. The offshore
supply vessel GULF TIGER cannot comply fully with lighting requirements
as set out in international regulations without interfering with the
special function of the vessel (33 U.S.C. 1605(c); 33 CFR 81.18).
    Locating the side lights 7\1/4\ inboard from the
greatest breadth of the vessel on the pilot house will provide a
shelter location for the lights and allow maneuvering within close
proximity to offshore platforms. In addition, the horizontal distance
between the forward and aft masthead lights may be 19-11\3/
8\. Placing the aft masthead light at the horizontal
distance from the forward masthead light as required by Annex I,
paragraph 3(a) of the 72 COLREGS, and Annex I, Section 84.05(a) of the
Inland Rules Act, would result in an aft masthead light location
directly over the aft cargo deck where it would interfere with loading
and unloading operations.
    The Certificate of Alternative Compliance allows for the placement
of the side lights to deviate from requirements set forth in Annex I,
paragraph 3(b) of 72 COLREGS, and Annex I, paragraph 84.05(b) of the
Inland Rules Act. In addition the Certificate of Alternative Compliance
allows for the horizontal separation of the forward and aft masthead
lights to deviate from the requirements of Annex I, paragraph 3(a) of
72 COLREGS, and Annex I, Section 84.05(a) of the Inland Rules Act.
    This notice is issued under authority of 33 U.S.C. 1605(c), and 33
CFR 81.18.

    Dated: February 26, 2010.
J.W. Johnson,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Inspections and Investigations
Branch, By Direction of the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2010-7826 Filed 4-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 28 (Monday, February 11, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 3157]
[FR Doc No: 2019-01844]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2014-0092; FRL-9985-88-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of
Fabrics and Other Textiles (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), NESHAP for Printing, Coating and
Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles (EPA ICR No. 2071.07, OMB Control
No. 2060-0522), to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review
and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a
proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through
March 31, 2019. Public comments were previously requested, via the
Federal Register on May 30, 2018, during a 60-day comment period. This
notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller
description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden
and cost to the public. An agency may neither conduct nor sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before March 13,
2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2014-0092, to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address all comments to OMB Desk
Officer for EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
(202) 564-0050; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and
Other Textiles apply to each existing, new, or reconstructed source
involved in printing, coating, slashing, dyeing or finishing of fabric
and other textiles. In general, all NESHAP standards require initial
notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/
operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to
maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup,
shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or
any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These
notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining
compliance, with 40 CFR part 63, subpart OOOO.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Facilities involved in the printing,
coating, slashing, dyeing or finishing of fabric and other textiles.
    Respondent's Obligation to Respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart OOOO).
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 43 (total).
    Frequency of Response: Initially and semiannually.
    Total Estimated Burden: 6,700 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total Estimated Cost: $760,000 (per year), which includes $1,120 in
annualized capital/startup and/or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: The decrease in burden from the most-
recently approved ICR is due to an adjustment that has more accurate
estimates in the number of sources. There is a significant decrease in
the number of respondents from the previously-approved ICR, as based on
current Agency analyses. This decrease also results in a reduced number
of responses. The decrease in the capital/startup vs. operation and
maintenance (O&M) costs as calculated in section 6(b)(iii) is due to
the decrease in the number of respondents and there being no additional
sources projected over the next 3 years. The overall result is a
decrease in burden hours and costs.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2019-01844 Filed 2-8-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P