[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 109 (Thursday, June 6, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 26454]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11840]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-85976; File No. 013-00069]

Initial Form ATS-N Filing; Notice of Extension of Commission
Review Period

May 31, 2019.
    On February 8, 2019, UBS ATS filed an initial Form ATS-N (``Form
ATS-N'') with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
Pursuant to Rule 304 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''), the Commission may, after notice and an opportunity for
hearing, declare an initial Form ATS-N ineffective no later than 120
days from the date of filing with the Commission, or, if applicable,
the extended review period. June 8, 2019 is 120 calendar days from the
date of filing. Pursuant to Rule 304(a)(1)(iv)(B), the Commission may
extend the initial Form ATS-N review period for up to an additional 120
calendar days if the initial Form ATS-N is unusually lengthy or raises
novel or complex issues that require additional time for review.
    UBS ATS was operating pursuant to an initial operation report on
Form ATS on file with the Commission as of January 7, 2019.\1\ UBS ATS
filed an initial Form ATS-N on February 8, 2019. During the initial 120
calendar day review period, the Commission staff has been reviewing the
disclosures on UBS ATS's initial Form ATS-N. In addition, the staff has
been engaged in ongoing discussions with UBS ATS about its disclosures
and manner of operations, as well as the requirements of Form ATS-N, to
facilitate complete and comprehensible disclosures that reflect the
complexities of those operations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ An NMS Stock ATS (as defined in Rule 300(k) of Regulation
ATS) that was operating pursuant to an initial operation report on
Form ATS on file with the Commission as of January 7, 2019 is a
``Legacy NMS Stock ATS.'' 17 CFR 242.301(b)(2)(viii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form ATS-N requires NMS Stock ATSs to file with the Commission, and
disclose to the public for the first time, certain information,
including descriptions by the NMS Stock ATSs of their fees, the trading
activities by their broker-dealer operators and their affiliates in the
NMS Stock ATSs, their use of market data, their written standards for
granting access to trading on the NMS Stock ATSs, and their written
safeguards and procedures for protecting their subscribers'
confidential trading information required by revised Rule 301(b)(10) of
Regulation ATS. The initial Form ATS-N disclosures and discussions with
Commission staff have revealed complexities about the operations of
Legacy NMS Stock ATSs including, among other things, matching
functionalities, means of order entry, order interaction and execution
procedures, conditional order processes, segmentation of orders, and
counterparty selection protocols. The Commission staff needs additional
time to review novel and complex issues such as these, which Commission
staff has discussed with UBS ATS. Extending the initial Form ATS-N
Commission review period for an additional 120 calendar days will
provide Commission staff an opportunity to continue its review of the
initial Form ATS-N disclosures and discussions with UBS ATS.
    In the conversations between UBS ATS and Commission staff about the
initial Form ATS-N disclosures and the ATS operations, Commission staff
and UBS ATS have discussed a potential amendment to update UBS ATS's
disclosures regarding the complexities of its operations. Extending the
review period will enable the NMS Stock ATS to amend its disclosures,
if appropriate, and allow Commission staff to conduct a thorough review
of amendments to the initial disclosures provided on the initial Form
ATS-N.
    For the reasons given above, the Commission is extending the review
period of the initial Form ATS-N submitted by UBS ATS. Accordingly,
pursuant to Rule 304(a)(1)(iv)(B), October 6, 2019 is the date by which
the Commission may declare the initial Form ATS-N submitted by UBS ATS
ineffective.

    By the Commission.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-11840 Filed 6-5-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58814-58815]
[FR Doc No: 2022-20989]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2022-0002]

Final Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Flood hazard determinations, which may include additions or
modifications of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
regulatory floodways on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and where
applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports have
been made final for the communities listed in the table below. The FIRM
and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that
a community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having
in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in
the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA's) National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP).

DATES: The date of February 9, 2023 has been established for the FIRM
and, where applicable, the supporting FIS report showing the new or
modified flood hazard information for each community.

ADDRESSES: The FIRM, and if applicable, the FIS report containing the
final flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at the respective Community Map Repository address listed in
the tables below and will be available online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov by the date indicated above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance

eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) makes the final determinations listed below for the new or
modified flood hazard information for each community listed.
Notification of these changes has been published in newspapers of local
circulation and 90 days have elapsed since that publication. The Deputy
Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation has resolved any
appeals resulting from this notification.
    This final notice is issued in accordance with section 110 of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR part
67. FEMA has developed criteria for floodplain management in floodprone
areas in accordance with 44 CFR part 60.
    Interested lessees and owners of real property are encouraged to
review the new or revised FIRM and FIS report available at the address
cited below for each community or online through the FEMA Map Service
Center at https://msc.fema.gov.
    The flood hazard determinations are made final in the watersheds
and/or communities listed in the table below.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Hampshire County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
                Docket Nos.: FEMA-B-1962, B-2053, B-2157
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Town of Amherst........................  Town Hall, Planning Department,
                                          4 Boltwood Avenue, Amherst, MA
                                          01002.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Prince George County, Virginia (All Jurisdictions)
                         Docket No.: FEMA-B-2160
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unincorporated Areas of Prince George    Prince George County Planning
 County.                                  and Zoning Office, 6602 Courts
                                          Drive, 1st Floor, Prince
                                          George, VA 23875.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-20989 Filed 9-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request EPA/ Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 2. OMB control number b. x None a__ __ __ __  __ __ __ __ __ 2 __ 0 __ 6 _ 0_

3. Type of information collection ( check one)

a.

New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. G Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one)

a.

Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: ___/___/___ c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes

No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a.

Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: ___/___/___

7. Title National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants ( NESHAP) for Leather Finishing Operations 8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) ICR No. 1985.02 9. Keywords leather finishing, leather, NESHAP, recordkeeping, reporting 10. Abstract Initially, all owners and operators of leather finishing operations will develop and implement a plan for demonstrating compliance that explains the methods used to inventory the finishes, HAP content of finishes, and production levels from each leather product process operation necessary to comply with these NESHAP. Following these procedures, the owner or operator of an affected source will record the quantity of finish used, HAP content of the finish, and quantity of leather produced in each leather product process operation each month in order to calculate a compliance ratio. The compliance ratio for each month will be reported to the Administrator in an annual compliance status certification report. Each affected source will also submit notifications and reports for certain actions as required by the NESHAP.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. P Business or other for profit e. X Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. X State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. G Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. P Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 12 b. Total annual responses 12 Percentage of these responses collected electronically 0%

c. Total hours requested 485 d. Current OMB inventory 0 e. Difference 485 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 0 2. Adjustment 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars)

a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs $ 0 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) $ 0 c. Total annualized cost requested $ 0 d. Current OMB inventory $ 0 e. Difference $ 0 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change $ 0 2. Adjustment $ 0 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. P Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply)

a.

Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c.

Reporting 1.

On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3.  Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. Q Semi annually 6.

Annually 7. Q Biannually 8. Q Other ( describe) 17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes

No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: William Schrock Phone: ( 919) 541 5032 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( i) Why the information is being collected' ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Oscar Morales, Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Environmental Information Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95


[Federal Register: June 2, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 106)]
[Notices]
[Page 31459]
[DOCID:fr02jn08-65]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER08-838-000; ER08-838-001]

Affordable Power, L.P.; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 23, 2008.
    Affordable Power, L.P. (Affordable Power) filed an application for
market-based rate authority, with an accompanying tariff. The proposed
market-based rate tariff provides for the sale of energy, capacity and
ancillary services at market-based rates. Affordable Power also
requested waivers of various Commission regulations. In particular,
Affordable Power requested that the Commission grant blanket approval
under 18 CFR part 34 of all future issuances of securities and
assumptions of liability by Affordable Power.
    On May 22, 2008, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director,
Division of Tariffs and Market Development-West, granted the requests
for blanket approval under part 34 (Director's Order). The Director's
Order also stated that the Commission would publish a separate notice
in the Federal Register establishing a period of time for the filing of
protests. Accordingly, any person desiring to be heard concerning the
blanket approvals of issuances of securities or assumptions of
liability by Affordable Power, should file a protest with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure. 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214 (2004). The
Commission encourages the electronic submission of protests using the
FERC Online link at http://www.ferc.gov.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests is
June 20, 2008.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition to such blanket
approvals by the deadline above, Affordable Power is authorized to
issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a guarantor,
endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of another
person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some lawful
object within the corporate purposes of Affordable Power, compatible
with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or appropriate
for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by
continued approvals of Affordable Power's issuance of securities or
assumptions of liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may
be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-12212 Filed 5-30-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:A 75 day time period to review the proposed regulations is insufficient. We are requesting that the review period be extended to 180 days.


[Federal Register: May 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 95)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 27637-27638]
[DOCID:fr18my10-3]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-1154; Airspace Docket No. 09-AGL-35]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Marion, IL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends Class E airspace for the Marion, IL area,
adding additional controlled airspace to accommodate Area Navigation
(RNAV) Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) at Southern
Illinois Airport, Carbondale/Murphysboro, IL. The FAA is taking this
action to enhance the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rule
(IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, July 29, 2010. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone (817) 321-
7716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On February 10, 2010, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to amend Class E airspace for Marion, IL,
reconfiguring controlled airspace at Southern Illinois Airport (75 FR
6593) Docket No. FAA-2009-1154. Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on
the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received. Class E airspace
designations are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9T
signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by amending Class E airspace for the Marion, IL area, adding
additional controlled airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface to accommodate SIAPs at Southern Illinois Airport, Carbondale/
Murphysboro, IL. The addition of the RNAV (GPS) RWY 36R SIAP at
Southern Illinois Airport has created the need to extend existing Class
E airspace to the south. Adjustment to the geographic coordinates for
Williamson County Regional Airport, Marion, IL, also will be made in
accordance with the FAAs National Aeronautical Charting Office. This
action is necessary for the safety and management of IFR operations
within the National Airspace System. With the exception of editorial
changes, and the changed described above, this rule is the same as that
proposed in the NPRM.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, section 106, describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends controlled airspace in the Marion, IL area.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15,
2009, is amended as follows:
* * * * *
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet
or more above the surface.
* * * * *

AGL IL E5 Marion, IL [Amended]

Carbondale/Murphysboro, Southern Illinois Airport, IL
    (Lat. 37[deg]46'41'' N., long. 89[deg]15'07'' W.)
    Marion, Williamson County Regional Airport, IL
    (Lat. 37[deg]45'18'' N., long. 89[deg]00'40'' W.)
    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
bounded by a line beginning at lat. 37[deg]53'40'' N., long.
88[deg]48'35'' W.; to lat. 37[deg]56'25'' N., long. 89[deg]02'40''
W.; to lat. 37[deg]58'45'' N., long. 89[deg]20'25'' W.; to lat.
37[deg]47'25'' N., long. 89[deg]26'00'' W.; to lat. 37[deg]42'10''
N., long. 89[deg]24'00'' W.; to lat. 37[deg]40'46'' N., long.
89[deg]20'17'' W.; to lat. 37[deg]34'56'' N., long. 89[deg]20'25''
W.; to lat. 37[deg]34'48'' N., long. 89[deg]10'21'' W.; to lat.
37[deg]37'05'' N., long. 89[deg]10'18'' W.; to lat. 37[deg]32'50''
N., long. 88[deg]59'00'' W.; to lat. 37[deg]42'35'' N., long.
88[deg]52'15'' W.; to the point of beginning.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on May 5, 2010.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2010-11735 Filed 5-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


1 TERRESTRIAL INVESTIGATION MODEL Version X2.0 Scientific Advisory Panel March 30, 2004 2 MODEL MODIFICATIONS 1. Modified model to include Generic Species 2. Modified time step to allow inclusion of a more representativeBimodal Feeding Pattern and thus exposure estimates.

3. Added an algorithm( Markov Chain) to address serial correlation between sequential foraging events 4. Developed a New Puddle Model that attempts to more closely mimics the dynamics of puddles on agricultural fields Major changes in response to the SAP review of Version 1 of OPP's Terrestrial Investigation Model are: 3 MODEL MODIFICATIONS In addition, an Inhalation and Dermal Model were developed and incorporated into the Model as previously proposed in 2000 at the SAP Meeting on The Agency's Probabilistic Modeling Initative The uncertainty associated with these routes of exposure is high,

however, it's believed, even if uncertain, it's preferable to making the incorrect assumption that they are minimal in all pesticide use scenarios. 4 MODEL MODIFICATIONS Version 2 of the Terrestrial Investigation Model is coded in the computer language C and employs Microsoft Excel as the input platform.

The Excel spreadsheet input data are written to a file that is read by the C code and processed. 5 General Model Overview The revised Terrestrial Investigation Model can be Characterized as:

 Multi media exposure/ effects model that addresses acute mortality in generic or specific species over a user defined exposure window.

 The Spatial Scale is at the field level, such that the field and surrounding area are assumed to meet habitat requirements for each species considered. 6 General Model Overview Comparison to Version 1 Yes( puddle)

No Soil yes No Soil Yes No Air Yes Yes( dew only)

Water Yes Yes( food only)

Vegetation Degradation/ Dissipation Yes No Air Yes( dew & dynamic puddle)

Yes( dew &

static puddle)

Water Yes Yes( food only)

Vegetation Residues on/ in EXPOSURE VERSION II VERSION I PARAMETER 7 General Model Overview Comparison to Version 1( cont.) Yes No Correlated Foraging Events Yes( 1 hr steps)

Yes( 12 hr steps)

Bi modal Feeding Pattern Yes No Contaminated Vegetation Contact Rates Yes No Inhalation Rates Yes Yes Water and Food Ingestion Rates Yes Yes Food Habits Behavior Version II Version I Parameter 8 General Model Overview Comparison to Version 1( cont.) Yes No Inhalation Yes No Dermal Yes Yes Oral Routes of Exposure Version II Version I Parameter 9 General Model Overview Comparison to Version 1( cont.) Generic or Focal Species Focal Species Indicator Species Yes( oral dose equivalents used to account for difference)

No Differential Sensitivity to routes of exposure ( oral, dermal, and inhalation) Yes Yes Individual Tolerance Yes Yes Species Distribution in Sensitivity EFFECTS Version II Version I Parameter 10 Select: Application Method Rate Time Crop type Input:

Site Soil Properties Site Meteorology Data Input Chemical Properties:

Media specific ½ life Henry's Law Constant Koc, Kow ect.

Input Inhalation & Dermal Exposure Parameters:

Spray Height & Duration Fraction Inhaled Crop Mass, Height, Density Specify Species, Feeding times & Split & Input Toxicological Data: Bird LD50, slope, Rat oral&

Inhal. LD50, Retention Rate Loop Over Days Select Individual Bird ( body weight, P factor, FOF, tolerance Calculate Transitional Probabilities Calculate daily metabolic requirement Select AM/ PM start &

end feeding times;

AM/ PM split Calculate days food Intake fraction of total required Calculates n puddle concentrations and durations Selects if on/ off field Selects hourly feeding fraction Selects time dependent pesticide Con. in each enviro.

media Calculates uptake by path way Compares dose to tolerance ( alive/ dead)

Pesticide Body Burden reduced by hourly elimination rate Model Setup Input data Loop Over Hours If Alive Hourly Loop Daily Loop


ÿþ<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml"  xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"  xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"  xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml"  xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">    <head>  <meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=unicode">  <meta name=ProgId content=Word.Document>  <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12">  <meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Word 12">  <link rel=File-List  href="NY(JohnH)-Ted2%2002-28-14%20RE%20EPA%20Request%20for%20Additional%20Clarifying%20and%20Missing%20Information%20on%20NY's%20SSI%20State%20plan%20Submittal_files/filelist.xml">  <link rel=Edit-Time-Data  href="NY(JohnH)-Ted2%2002-28-14%20RE%20EPA%20Request%20for%20Additional%20Clarifying%20and%20Missing%20Information%20on%20NY's%20SSI%20State%20plan%20Submittal_files/editdata.mso">  <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>   <o:DocumentProperties>    <o:Author>TG</o:Author>    <o:Template>NormalEmail</o:Template>    <o:Revision>1</o:Revision>    <o:TotalTime>0</o:TotalTime>    <o:Created>2014-02-28T16:44:00Z</o:Created>    <o:Pages>1</o:Pages>    <o:Words>719</o:Words>    <o:Characters>4102</o:Characters>    <o:Company>US-EPA</o:Company>    <o:Lines>34</o:Lines>    <o:Paragraphs>9</o:Paragraphs>    <o:CharactersWithSpaces>4812</o:CharactersWithSpaces>    <o:Version>12.00</o:Version>   </o:DocumentProperties>  </xml><![endif]-->  <link rel=themeData  href="NY(JohnH)-Ted2%2002-28-14%20RE%20EPA%20Request%20for%20Additional%20Clarifying%20and%20Missing%20Information%20on%20NY's%20SSI%20State%20plan%20Submittal_files/themedata.thmx">  <link rel=colorSchemeMapping  href="NY(JohnH)-Ted2%2002-28-14%20RE%20EPA%20Request%20for%20Additional%20Clarifying%20and%20Missing%20Information%20on%20NY's%20SSI%20State%20plan%20Submittal_files/colorschememapping.xml">  <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>   <w:WordDocument>    <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>    <w:TrackMoves/>    <w:TrackFormatting/>    <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>    <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>    <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>    <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>    <w:DoNotPromoteQF/>    <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther>    <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian>    <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript>    <w:Compatibility>     <w:DoNotExpandShiftReturn/>     <w:BreakWrappedTables/>     <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/>     <w:DontVertAlignCellWithSp/>     <w:DontBreakConstrainedForcedTables/>     <w:DontVertAlignInTxbx/>     <w:Word11KerningPairs/>     <w:CachedColBalance/>    </w:Compatibility>    <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>    <m:mathPr>     <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/>     <m:brkBin m:val="before"/>     <m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/>     <m:smallFrac m:val="off"/>     <m:dispDef/>     <m:lMargin m:val="0"/>     <m:rMargin m:val="0"/>     <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/>     <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/>     <m:intLim m:val="subSup"/>     <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/>    </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument>  </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>   <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true"    DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"    LatentStyleCount="267">    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false"     UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography"/>    <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading"/>   </w:LatentStyles>  </xml><![endif]-->  <style>  <!--   /* Font Definitions */   @font-face  	{font-family:"Cambria Math";  	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;  	mso-font-charset:1;  	mso-generic-font-family:roman;  	mso-font-format:other;  	mso-font-pitch:variable;  	mso-font-signature:0 0 0 0 0 0;}  @font-face  	{font-family:Calibri;  	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;  	mso-font-charset:0;  	mso-generic-font-family:swiss;  	mso-font-pitch:variable;  	mso-font-signature:-520092929 1073786111 9 0 415 0;}  @font-face  	{font-family:Tahoma;  	panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;  	mso-font-charset:0;  	mso-generic-font-family:swiss;  	mso-font-pitch:variable;  	mso-font-signature:-520081665 -1073717157 41 0 66047 0;}   /* Style Definitions */   p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal  	{mso-style-unhide:no;  	mso-style-qformat:yes;  	mso-style-parent:"";  	margin:0in;  	margin-bottom:.0001pt;  	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;  	font-size:11.0pt;  	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";  	mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;  	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;}  a:link, span.MsoHyperlink  	{mso-style-priority:99;  	color:blue;  	text-decoration:underline;  	text-underline:single;}  a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed  	{mso-style-noshow:yes;  	mso-style-priority:99;  	color:purple;  	text-decoration:underline;  	text-underline:single;}  p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate  	{mso-style-noshow:yes;  	mso-style-priority:99;  	mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";  	margin:0in;  	margin-bottom:.0001pt;  	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;  	font-size:8.0pt;  	font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";  	mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;  	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;}  p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph  	{mso-style-priority:34;  	mso-style-unhide:no;  	mso-style-qformat:yes;  	margin-top:0in;  	margin-right:0in;  	margin-bottom:0in;  	margin-left:.5in;  	margin-bottom:.0001pt;  	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;  	font-size:11.0pt;  	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";  	mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;  	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;}  span.EmailStyle18  	{mso-style-type:personal;  	mso-style-noshow:yes;  	mso-style-unhide:no;  	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";  	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;  	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;  	mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;  	color:windowtext;}  span.EmailStyle19  	{mso-style-type:personal;  	mso-style-noshow:yes;  	mso-style-unhide:no;  	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";  	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;  	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;  	mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;  	color:#1F497D;}  span.BalloonTextChar  	{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";  	mso-style-noshow:yes;  	mso-style-priority:99;  	mso-style-unhide:no;  	mso-style-locked:yes;  	mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";  	mso-ansi-font-size:8.0pt;  	mso-bidi-font-size:8.0pt;  	font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";  	mso-ascii-font-family:Tahoma;  	mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;  	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;  	mso-hansi-font-family:Tahoma;  	mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma;}  .MsoChpDefault  	{mso-style-type:export-only;  	mso-default-props:yes;  	font-size:10.0pt;  	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;  	mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;}  @page WordSection1  	{size:8.5in 11.0in;  	margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;  	mso-header-margin:.5in;  	mso-footer-margin:.5in;  	mso-paper-source:0;}  div.WordSection1  	{page:WordSection1;}  -->  </style>  <!--[if gte mso 10]>  <style>   /* Style Definitions */   table.MsoNormalTable  	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";  	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;  	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;  	mso-style-noshow:yes;  	mso-style-priority:99;  	mso-style-qformat:yes;  	mso-style-parent:"";  	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;  	mso-para-margin:0in;  	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;  	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;  	font-size:10.0pt;  	font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}  </style>  <![endif]-->  </head>    <body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple style='tab-interval:.5in'>    <div class=WordSection1>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:135.0pt;text-indent:-135.0pt;tab-stops:  135.0pt;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none'><b><span  style='color:black'>From:<span style='mso-tab-count:1'>                                             </span></span></b><span  style='color:black'>John Henkes [jlhenkes@gw.dec.state.ny.us]<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:135.0pt;text-indent:-135.0pt;tab-stops:  135.0pt;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none'><b><span  style='color:black'>Sent:<span style='mso-tab-count:1'>                                               </span></span></b><span  style='color:black'>Friday, February 28, 2014 11:37 AM<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:135.0pt;text-indent:-135.0pt;tab-stops:  135.0pt;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none'><b><span  style='color:black'>To:<span style='mso-tab-count:1'>                                                  </span></span></b><span  style='color:black'>Gardella, Anthony<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:135.0pt;text-indent:-135.0pt;tab-stops:  135.0pt;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none'><b><span  style='color:black'>Cc:<span style='mso-tab-count:1'>                                                   </span></span></b><span  style='color:black'>Michael Cronin; Rachel Seebacher<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:135.0pt;text-indent:-135.0pt;tab-stops:  135.0pt;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none'><b><span  style='color:black'>Subject:<span style='mso-tab-count:1'>                                         </span></span></b><span  style='color:black'>RE: EPA Request for Additional Clarifying and Missing  Information on NY's SSI State plan Submittal<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:135.0pt;text-indent:-135.0pt;tab-stops:  135.0pt;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none'><b><span  style='color:black'>Attachments:<span style='mso-tab-count:1'>                               </span></span></b><span  style='color:black'>EPA comment & NYS responce for SSI plan.pdf<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>    <div>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";  mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"'>Ted,<o:p></o:p></span></p>    </div>    <div>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";  mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"'> <o:p></o:p></span></p>    </div>    <div>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;  font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"'>As  we discussed,  attached is a response document to EPA's comments on  NYS's plan for existing SSI units.  If you have any further questions do  not hesitate to contact me.<o:p></o:p></span></p>    </div>    <div>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";  mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"'> <o:p></o:p></span></p>    </div>    <div>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";  mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"'><br>  John L Henkes, PE<br>  NYSDEC, Environmental Engineer II<br>  Bureau of Stationary Sources<br>  (518)402-8403<br>  (518)402-9035 fax<br>  <a href="mailto:jlhenkes@gw.dec.state.ny.us">jlhenkes@gw.dec.state.ny.us</a>>>>  "Gardella, Anthony" <<a href="mailto:Gardella.Anthony@epa.gov">Gardella.Anthony@epa.gov</a>>  1/17/2014 4:19 PM >>><o:p></o:p></span></p>    </div>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>John,<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Thanks for the response.   After you read over my comments perhaps we need to speak on the phone before  you respond formally   or you could send a  DRAFT  response for our review that  I could review.  This new clarifying information will be referred to in  our proposed Federal Register notice and included in the electronic  docket.  <o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>I went through your submittal  and have the following comments:<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal><u><span style='color:#1F497D'>General Comment<o:p></o:p></span></u></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:4.8pt;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:2.4pt'><span style='color:#1F497D'>In general, perhaps you  could resend the entire response including the new information/clarifications  I m now requesting.  Additionally perhaps you could include   attachments to the back of the upfront response document.  For example,  you could include the new Emission Inventory as an appendix to the document  with a cover page called Appendix B and a name  Emission Inventory    Supplementary to State Plan.  Appendix C to the document would also have a  cover page called   Copy of Proposed and Adopted Regulations as Published  in the NY State Register.   Appendix A would be the email you refer to in  EPA question 2   you could provide a cover page for this also.<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:4.8pt;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:2.4pt'><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:4.8pt;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:2.4pt'><u><span style='color:#1F497D'>EPA Question 2   NY  response<o:p></o:p></span></u></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:4.8pt;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:2.4pt'><span style='color:#1F497D'>You refer to an attached  e-mail but it s not included in your response.  Please include it in a new  Appendix A as noted above.  Also, in your response to question 2 please  refer to the e-mail as being in Appendix A.<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:4.8pt;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:2.4pt'><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:4.8pt;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:2.4pt'><u><span style='color:#1F497D'>Emission Inventory<o:p></o:p></span></u></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:9.6pt;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:2.4pt'><span style='color:#1F497D'>The new inventory you sent  is for specific units instead of the facility (see EPA question 5).  In  this regard,<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:9.6pt;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:2.4pt'><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoListParagraph style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:12.0pt;  margin-bottom:.6pt;margin-left:20.4pt;text-indent:-.25in'><span  style='color:#1F497D'>-</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";  color:#1F497D'>        </span><span  style='color:#1F497D'>The new emissions inventory is for units located at 7  facilities (Albany   south, Albany   north, Glen Falls, Saratoga, Oneida, Bird  Island and Southtowns) but NY s July 2013 State plan had emission inventories  at 12 facilities.  Can you now include the emission inventory for the  units at the missing 5 facilities (Bergen Pt, Poughkeepsie, Little Falls,  Watertown, and Tonawanda) even though some of these may be shut down.  <o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoListParagraph style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:12.0pt;  margin-bottom:.6pt;margin-left:20.4pt;text-indent:-.25in'><span  style='color:#1F497D'>-</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";  color:#1F497D'>        </span><span  style='color:#1F497D'>I believe Oneida has 3 units at the facility but your new  inventory has 4 units (if I m reading your data sheets correctly   perhaps I m  not as it s sometimes difficult to determine from the data sheets).  Can  you correct.<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoListParagraph style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:12.0pt;  margin-bottom:.6pt;margin-left:20.4pt;text-indent:-.25in'><span  style='color:#1F497D'>-</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";  color:#1F497D'>        </span><span  style='color:#1F497D'>For Albany   South, is there any data for Unit 2?<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoListParagraph style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:12.0pt;  margin-bottom:.6pt;margin-left:20.4pt;text-indent:-.25in'><span  style='color:#1F497D'>-</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";  color:#1F497D'>        </span><span  style='color:#1F497D'>For the Bird Island facility which has 3 units the 5 data  sheets (each for a different reporting year) do not indicate which units the  data represents (again, if I m reading the data sheets correctly).  I  understand there are 3 units at this facility. <o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoListParagraph style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:12.0pt;  margin-bottom:.6pt;margin-left:20.4pt;text-indent:-.25in'><span  style='color:#1F497D'>-</span><span style='font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";  color:#1F497D'>        </span><span  style='color:#1F497D'>Except for Bird Island, much of the emissions data is  from the 1990s   is there any more recent emissions data?  <o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:.2in;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:0in'><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:.2in;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:0in'><span style='color:#1F497D'>Thanks John, give me a call  if you wish to discuss. <o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:.2in;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:0in'><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:.2in;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:0in'><span style='color:#1F497D'>Ted Gardella<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:.2in;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:0in'><span style='color:#1F497D'>Environmental Engineer<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:.2in;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:0in'><span style='color:#1F497D'>Air Planning Section, Air  Programs Branch<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:.2in;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:0in'><span style='color:#1F497D'>EPA Region 2<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:.2in;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:0in'><span style='color:#1F497D'>NY, NY<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:2.4pt;margin-right:.2in;margin-bottom:  .6pt;margin-left:0in'><span style='color:#1F497D'>212-637-3892<o:p></o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>    <div>    <div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>    <p class=MsoNormal style='mso-outline-level:1'><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;  font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;  font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> John Henkes [<a  href="mailto:jlhenkes<EMAIL_ADDRESS> <br>  <b>Sent:</b> Thursday, December 19, 2013 10:22 AM<br>  <b>To:</b> Gardella, Anthony<br>  <b>Cc:</b> Michael Cronin; Rachel Seebacher<br>  <b>Subject:</b> Re: EPA Request for Additional Clarifying and Missing  Information on NY's SSI State plan Submittal<o:p></o:p></span></p>    </div>    </div>    <p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>    <div>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>Hi  Ted,<o:p></o:p></span></p>    </div>    <div>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> <o:p></o:p></span></p>    </div>    <div>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>Response  was added to your requests in bold along with several other attachments.<o:p></o:p></span></p>    </div>    <div>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> <o:p></o:p></span></p>    </div>    <div>    <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;  font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>Hope this covers everything.<o:p></o:p></span></p>    </div>    <div>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> <o:p></o:p></span></p>    </div>    <div>    <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'><br>  John L Henkes, PE<br>  NYSDEC, Environmental Engineer II<br>  Bureau of Stationary Sources<br>  (518)402-8403<br>  (518)402-9035 fax<br>  <br>  >>> "Gardella, Anthony" <<a  href="mailto:Gardella.Anthony@epa.gov">Gardella.Anthony@epa.gov</a>>  11/26/2013 3:48 PM >>><o:p></o:p></span></p>    </div>    <p class=MsoNormal>John,</p>    <p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>    <p class=MsoNormal>Confirming our phone conversation this morning, please  provide the clarifying and missing information on NY s State plan submittal for  existing sewage sludge incinerators.  EPA s request for this additional  information is summarized in the attached document.  The attached is just  a summary of the information EPA is requesting as I discussed with you this  morning.  You can respond directly to me via email.  </p>    <p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>    <p class=MsoNormal>If you need any clarification, please give me a call.</p>    <p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>    <p class=MsoNormal>Ted Gardella</p>    <p class=MsoNormal>Environmental Engineer</p>    <p class=MsoNormal>Air Planning Section, Air Programs Branch</p>    <p class=MsoNormal>EPA Region 2</p>    <p class=MsoNormal>NY, NY</p>    <p class=MsoNormal>212-637-3892  </p>    </div>    </body>    </html>


[Federal Register: October 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 192)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 61348-61352]
[DOCID:fr05oc10-7]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0276; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-144-AD;
Amendment 39-16452; AD 2010-20-17]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    Three cases of in-flight loss of cabin pressurization have been
reported, resulting from failure of a bulkhead check valve in
combination with failure of an air supply duct.
    In addition to mandating inspection, rework and/or replacement
of the air supply ducts, Airworthiness Directive (AD) CF-2003-05
(subsequently revised to CF-2003-05R1) [which corresponds to FAA AD
2004-22-08] mandated the incorporation of a 4000 flight-hour
repetitive inspection task for bulkhead check valves, Part Numbers
(P/N) 92E20-3 and 92E20-4, into the approved maintenance schedule.
However, this repetitive inspection task has since been superseded
by a 3000 flight-hour periodic discard task for these bulkhead check
valves.
    This directive mandates revision of the approved maintenance
schedule to incorporate the discard task for bulkhead check valves,
P/N 92E20-3 and 92E20-4, and supersedes the instructions in
Corrective Actions, Part A, of AD CF-2003-05R1, dated 7 February
2006.

We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective November 9, 2010.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of November 9,
2010.
    On December 2, 2004 (69 FR 62807, October 28, 2004), the Director
of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of
certain other publications listed in this AD.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Alfano, Airframe and
Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on April 5, 2010 (75 FR
17086). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    Three cases of in-flight loss of cabin pressurization have been
reported, resulting from failure of a bulkhead check valve in
combination with failure of an air supply duct.
    In addition to mandating inspection, rework and/or replacement
of the air supply ducts, Airworthiness Directive (AD) CF-2003-05
(subsequently revised to CF-2003-05R1) [which corresponds to FAA AD
2004-22-08] mandated the incorporation of a 4000 flight-hour
repetitive inspection task for bulkhead check valves, Part Numbers
(P/N) 92E20-3 and 92E20-4, into the approved maintenance schedule.
However, this repetitive inspection task has since been superseded
by a 3000 flight-hour periodic discard task for these bulkhead check
valves.
    This directive mandates revision of the approved maintenance
schedule to incorporate the discard task for bulkhead check valves,
P/N 92E20-3 and 92E20-4, and supersedes the instructions in
Corrective Actions, Part A, of AD CF-2003-05R1, dated 7 February
2006.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.

Request to Provide Credit for Actions Accomplished Per Previous Issue
of Service Bulletin

    Air Wisconsin requests that credit be provided for actions
accomplished in accordance with a previous issue of a service bulletin.
Air Wisconsin states that paragraph (g)(3) of the NPRM specifies that
actions accomplished in accordance with Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A601R-21-053, dated November 8, 2001, are considered
acceptable for compliance; however, paragraph (i) of the NPRM states
that Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-21-053, Revision `A,'
dated January 28, 2003, needs to be accomplished. Air Wisconsin states
that the NPRM should provide credit for actions accomplished in
accordance with Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-21-053, dated
November 8, 2001; and Revision `A,' dated January 28, 2003. Air
Wisconsin states that Revision `A' did not affect airplanes on which
actions were accomplished in accordance with the original issue of that
service bulletin. Air Wisconsin states that its affected airplanes were
modified in accordance with Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-21-
053, dated November 8, 2001.
    We agree that credit should be given for actions done in accordance
with Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-21-053, dated November 8,
2001, and note that this AD does provide credit. In the ``Restatement
of Requirements of AD 2004-22-08, Amendment 39-13836'' section of this
AD, we refer to the latest revision of the service bulletin, Bombardier
Alert Service Bulletin A601R-21-053, Revision `A,' dated January 28,
2003, for accomplishing the actions specified in paragraphs (h) and (i)
of this AD. In paragraph (g)(3) of this AD, we provide credit for
actions done before December 2, 2004 (the effective date of AD 2004-22-
08) in accordance with Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-21-053,
dated November 8, 2001, with the corresponding actions in paragraphs
specified in paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD. We have not changed the
AD in regard to this issue. Norman -Payroll No: 68828 -Folios: 14-17 -
Date: 10/01/10[FEDREG][VOL]*[/VOL][NO]*[/NO][DATE]*[/
DATE][RULES][RULE][PREAMB][AGENCY]*[/AGENCY][SUBJECT]*[/SUBJECT][/
PREAMB][SUPLINF][HED]*[/HED]?>

Request To Clarify the Requirements of Paragraph (j) of the NPRM

    Comair, Inc. (Comair) notes that paragraph (j) of the NPRM proposes
to revise the Airworthiness Limitations

section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to include the
information in Bombardier Temporary Revision (TR) 1-2-39, dated
December 12, 2008, to Section 2--Systems and Powerplant Program, of
Part 1 of the Bombardier CL-600-2B19 Maintenance Requirement Manual
(MRM). Comair states that the MRM is not structured to incorporate Part
1 items into Part 2 of the MRM. Comair notes that Note 3 of the NPRM
allows the TR to be removed once the information in TR 1-2-39 has been
incorporated into a general revision. Comair notes that Revision 14,
dated September 10, 2009, of the MRM has incorporated the information
in TR 1-2-39.
    We infer that Comair is requesting that we clarify the requirements
of paragraph (j) of the NPRM. We agree that clarification is necessary.
The intent of revising Part 2 of the Airworthiness Limitations section
is to prohibit approval of any alternative replacement times or
structural inspection intervals for this bulkhead check valve. But, we
have clarified Note 3 of this AD to specify Part 2 of the Airworthiness
Limitations section of the MRM. Note 3 of this AD states that the
actions required by paragraph (j) of this AD may be done by inserting a
copy of Bombardier TR 1-2-39, dated December 12, 2008, into the MRM,
which introduces Bombardier Task 21-51-21-13. When Bombardier Task 21-
51-21-13 has been included in general revisions of the MRM, the general
revisions may be inserted into Part 2 of the Airworthiness Limitations
section of the MRM, provided the relevant information in the general
revision is identical to that in the TR.

Request To Clarify the Intent of Paragraph (j) of the NPRM

    Comair states that if the intent of paragraph (j) of the NPRM is to
introduce the task into its proper part of the MRM, that is, Part 1,
then doing so would contradict the rationale the FAA previously
provided in AD 2004-22-08, Amendment 39-13836, (69 FR 62807, October
28, 2004). In AD 2004-22-08, the FAA responded to two requests to
consider the MRM Task Number 21-51-21-07 as an alternative to using
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-21-054, dated November 8, 2001.
Comair points out that in AD 2004-22-08 the FAA stated, ``Although Part
1 of the MRM is accepted by the FAA, it is not approved, as is Part 2
of the Airworthiness Limitations section. We cannot control revisions
of the MRM; therefore, a task could be changed or deleted, and the AD
requirements would be modified without our approval.'' Comair points
out that by mandating the TR, the FAA is now requiring the
documentation that it previously rejected incorporating in AD 2004-22-
08.
    We infer that Comair is requesting clarification of the
requirements of paragraph (j) of the NPRM. While the FAA reviews and
acknowledges the contents of Part 1 of the MRM, Part 1 does not require
FAA approval to be changed. Consequently, the FAA cannot control
revisions to this section of the MRM. However, the FAA does approve the
contents of Part 2 of the MRM, which becomes legally enforceable. A
task may be altered or deleted and may nullify the intent of the AD.
However, operators may request approval of an AMOC to allow the use of
a particular task card, provided a specified revision and date are
adhered to. Any subsequent revisions would require a new AMOC request
to ensure that the AD requirements are still met. We have not changed
the AD in regard to this issue.

Request To Allow Continuation of Previously Issued AMOCs

    Comair requests that paragraph (l)(1) of the NPRM be revised to
accept previously issued AMOCs. Comair states that it has received
AMOCs from the New York Aircraft Certification Office that have allowed
it to perform inspections using Comair task cards for complying with
MRM Task 21-51-21-07 instead of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A601R-21-054, dated November 8, 2001.
    We agree that the previously issued AMOCs to Comair continue to
meet the requirements of this AD because they incorporated the bulkhead
check valve discard task that is required by paragraph (j) of this AD.
While we are not accepting all previously issued AMOCs that were
granted for AD 2004-22-08, we have revised paragraph (l)(1) of this AD
to accept those two specific AMOCs granted to Comair.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD affects
about 644 products of U.S. registry.
    The actions that are required by AD 2004-22-08 and retained in this
AD take about 15 work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of
$85 per work hour. Required parts cost about $0 per product. Based on
these figures, the estimated cost of the currently required actions is
$1,869 per product.
    We estimate that it takes about 1 work-hour per product to comply
with the new requirement to revise the ALI. The average labor rate is
$85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this
requirement of the AD on U.S. operators to be $54,740, or $85 per
product.
    We estimate that it takes about 5 work-hours per product to comply
with the new inspection requirement. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $594 per product, per
replacement cycle. Where the service information lists required parts
costs that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will
be no charge for these costs. As we do not control warranty coverage
for affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than
estimated here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the
inspection requirements of the AD on U.S. operators to be $656,236, or
$1,019 per product, per replacement cycle.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations

for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that
is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking
action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-13836 (69 FR
62807, October 28, 2004) and adding the following new AD:

2010-20-17 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-16452. Docket No. FAA-
2010-0276; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-144-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective November
9, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2004-22-08, Amendment 39-13836.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes, serial numbers 7003 and
subsequent, certificated in any category.

    Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance according
to paragraph (l) of this AD. The request should include a
description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the airplane.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 21: Air
conditioning.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    Three cases of in-flight loss of cabin pressurization have been
reported, resulting from failure of a bulkhead check valve in
combination with failure of an air supply duct.
    In addition to mandating inspection, rework and/or replacement
of the air supply ducts, Airworthiness Directive (AD) CF-2003-05
(subsequently revised to CF-2003-05R1) [which corresponds to FAA AD
2004-22-08] mandated the incorporation of a 4 000 flight-hour
repetitive inspection task for bulkhead check valves, Part Numbers
(P/N) 92E20-3 and 92E20-4, into the approved maintenance schedule.
However, this repetitive inspection task has since been superseded
by a 3000 flight-hour periodic discard task for these bulkhead check
valves.
    This directive mandates revision of the approved maintenance
schedule to incorporate the discard task for bulkhead check valves,
P/N 92E20-3 and 92E20-4, and supersedes the instructions in
Corrective Actions, Part A, of AD CF-2003-05R1, dated 7 February
2006.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Restatement of Requirements of AD 2004-22-08, Amendment 39-13836:

Service Information Clarifications

    (g) Paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD pertain to
the service information referenced in this AD.
    (1) Although Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-21-053,
Revision `A,' dated January 28, 2003; and Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A601R-21-054, dated November 8, 2001; specify to submit
certain information to the manufacturer, this AD does not include
such a requirement.
    (2) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-21-054, dated
November 8, 2001, recommends sending all damaged check valves to the
manufacturer for analysis; however, this AD does not include that
requirement.
    (3) Accomplishment of the actions specified in Bombardier Alert
Service Bulletin A601R-21-053, dated November 8, 2001, before
December 2, 2004 (the effective date of AD 2004-22-08), is
considered acceptable for compliance with the applicable actions
specified in this AD.

Repetitive Inspections/Related Corrective Actions

    (h) Within 500 flight hours after December 2, 2004: Do the
detailed inspections and related corrective actions required by
paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD, per the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-21-053,
Revision `A,' dated January 28, 2003; and Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A601R-21-054, dated November 8, 2001; as applicable.
    (1) For airplanes having bulkhead check valves with part number
(P/N) 92E20-3/-4, as identified in Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A601R-21-054, dated November 8, 2001: Inspect the left- and right-
hand bulkhead check valves for damage (cracking, breakage). If any
damage is found, before further flight, replace the damaged valve.
Repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 4,000 flight hours
until the replacement required by paragraph (j) of this AD is done.
    (2) For airplanes having serial numbers 7003 through 7067
inclusive, and 7069 through 7477 inclusive: Inspect the left- and
right-hand air supply ducts of the rear bulkhead for damage
(tearing, delamination, or cracking). If any damage is found, before
further flight, either rework or replace the damaged air supply
duct, which ends the inspections for that air supply duct only. If
no damage is found, repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 500 flight hours until accomplishment of paragraph (i)
of this AD.

    Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,

magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''

Terminating Action for Repetitive Inspections of Air Supply Ducts

    (i) Except as required by paragraph (h)(2) of this AD, for
airplanes having serial numbers 7003 through 7067 inclusive, and
7069 through 7477 inclusive: Within 5,000 flight hours after
December 2, 2004, either rework or replace the left- and right-hand
air ducts, as applicable, per the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-21-053, Revision `A,' dated
January 28, 2003; and Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-21-
054, dated November 8, 2001; as applicable. Accomplishment of this
paragraph ends the repetitive inspections required by paragraph
(h)(2) of this AD.

New Requirements of This AD:

Actions and Compliance

    (j) For airplanes having serial numbers 7003 and subsequent:
Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the
Airworthiness Limitations section of the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness to include the information in Bombardier Temporary
Revision (TR) 1-2-39, dated December 12, 2008, to Section 2--Systems
and Powerplant Program, of Part 1 of the Bombardier CL-600-2B19
Maintenance Requirement Manual (MRM). This task requires replacement
of the bulkhead check valves having P/N 92E20-3 or 92E20-4 at
intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight hours. Operate the airplane
thereafter according to the limitations and procedures in the TR.
    (k) Thereafter, except as provided in paragraph (j) of this AD,
no alternative replacement times or structural inspection intervals
may be approved for this bulkhead check valve.

    Note 3:  The actions required by paragraph (j) of this AD may be
done by inserting a copy of Bombardier TR 1-2-39, dated December 12,
2008, into the MRM, which introduces Task 21-51-21-13. When
Bombardier Task 21-51-21-13 has been included in general revisions
of the MRM, the general revisions may be inserted into Part 2 of the
Airworthiness Limitations section of the MRM, provided the relevant
information in the general revision is identical to that in the TR.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 4: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (l) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Program
Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury New York 11590; telephone 516-
228-7300; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal
maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD. Two AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 2004-22-08, Amendment 39-13836, are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this AD. These two
approved AMOCs are identified in paragraphs (l)(1)(i) and (l)(1)(ii)
of this AD. All other AMOCs approved previously in accordance with
AD 2004-22-08, Amendment 39-13836, are not approved as AMOCs with
this AD.
    (i) An AMOC approved by the New York ACO on November 17, 2004,
in response to Comair AMOC request memo, dated November 10, 2004.
    (ii) An AMOC approved by the New York ACO on October 13, 2006,
in response to Comair AMOC request memo, dated September 19, 2006.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (m) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2009-31,
dated July 8, 2009; and the service information specified in Table 1
of this AD for related information.

                                          Table 1--Related Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Document                               Revision                               Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bombardier TR 1-2-39 to Section 2--     Original...........................  December 12, 2008.
 Systems and Powerplant Program, of
 Part 1 of the Bombardier CL-600-2B19
 MRM.
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin       `A'................................  January 28, 2003.
 A601R-21-053.
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin       Original...........................  November 8, 2001.
 A601R-21-054.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (n) You must use the service information specified in Table 2 of
this AD, as applicable, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.

                                   Table 2--Material Incorporated by Reference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Document                               Revision                               Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bombardier Temporary Revision (TR) 1-2- Original...........................  December 12, 2008.
 39 to Section 2--Systems and
 Powerplant Program, of Part 1 of the
 Bombardier CL-600-2B19 Maintenance
 Requirement Manual (MRM).
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin       `A'................................  January 28, 2003.
 A601R-21-053.
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin       Original...........................  November 8, 2001.
 A601R-21-054.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of Bombardier TR 1-2-39, dated December
12, 2008, to Section 2--Systems and Powerplant Program, of Part 1 of
the Bombardier CL-600-2B19 MRM, under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51.
    (2) The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the
incorporation by reference of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A601R-21-053, Revision `A,' dated January 28, 2003; and Bombardier
Alert Service Bulletin A601R-21-054, dated November 8, 2001; on
December 2, 2004 (69 FR 62807, October 28, 2004).
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; e-mail

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com.
    (4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 16, 2010.
Robert D. Breneman,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-24256 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P