[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 138 (Friday, July 18, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41908-41910]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16831]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2013-0674; FRL-9913-79-Region-7]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri; Control of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions From Large Stationary
Internal Combustion Engines

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted
by the State of Missouri to EPA on September 21, 2010, with a
supplemental revision submitted on July 3, 2013. The purpose of the SIP
revision is to incorporate revisions to a Missouri regulation to
control Nitrogen Oxide (NOX) emissions from large stationary
internal combustion engines. This revision includes an emission rate
limitation for both large stationary diesel and dual fuel internal
combustion engines and adds an exemption for compression ignited
stationary internal combustion engines that emit 25 tons or less of
NOX between May 1 and September 30. EPA has determined that
the SIP revision submitted by the State of Missouri satisfies the
applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), and in
particular, the April 21, 2004, final Federal Phase II NOX
SIP Call.

DATES: This rule is effective on August 18, 2014.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R07-OAR-2013-0674 for
this action. All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas
66219 from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine these documents
should make an appointment with the office at least 24 hours in
advance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lachala Kemp, Air Planning and
Development Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7,
11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, KS 66219; telephone number: (913) 551-
7214; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following questions:

Table of Contents

I. What action is EPA taking in this final rule?
II. What is the background for the approvals by EPA in this final
rule?
III. EPA's Response to Comment
IV. EPA's Final Action

I. What action is EPA taking in this final rule?

    EPA is taking final action to approve a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of Missouri to EPA on September
21, 2010, with a supplemental revision submitted on July 3, 2013. The
purpose of the SIP revision is to incorporate changes to a Missouri
regulation (Title 10 of the Code of State Regulations (CSR) 10-6.390)
to control Nitrogen Oxide (NOX) emissions from large
stationary internal combustion (IC) engines to ensure compliance with
the federal NOX control plan to reduce the transport of air
pollutants.\1\ EPA finalized the second phase (Phase II) of its rule
known as the NOX SIP Call Rule on April 21, 2004 (69 FR
21604). Phase II required the eastern one-third of Missouri to
participate in the NOX SIP Call and included a provision
related to source categories of IC engines. The IC provision
established a requirement to decrease emissions from diesel and dual
fuel stationary IC engines by ninety percent. Phase II of the
NOX SIP Call

also required each state in the control region to submit a SIP that
contained adequate provisions prohibiting its sources from emitting air
pollutants that would contribute significantly to nonattainment, or
interfere with maintenance, in one or more downwind states. See,
generally, 69 FR 21608.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The effective date of the rule in Missouri was May 30, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Missouri's rule establishes emissions levels for large stationary
internal combustion engines of greater than one thousand three hundred
horsepower located in the counties of Bollinger, Butler, Cape
Girardeau, Carter, Clark, Crawford, Dent, Dunklin, Franklin, Gasconade,
Iron, Jefferson, Lewis, Lincoln, Madison, Marion, Mississippi,
Montgomery, New Madrid, Oregon, Pemiscot, Perry, Pike, Ralls, Reynolds,
Ripley, St. Charles, St. Francois, St. Louis, Ste. Genevieve, Scott,
Shannon, Stoddard, Warren, Washington, and Wayne counties, and the City
of St. Louis in Missouri. To be subject to this rule, the IC engines
must either have emitted greater than one ton per day of NOX
on average during the period from May 1 through September 30 of 1995,
1996, or 1997, or began operations after September 30, 1997. 10 CSR 10-
6.390(1)(A), (B).
    On January 8, 2014, EPA published in the Federal Register a
proposed rulemaking to approve Missouri's request to revise Missouri's
SIP and include this 2010 amendment to the Missouri rule. The public
comment period on EPA's proposed rule opened January 8, 2014, the date
of its publication in the Federal Register, and closed on February 7,
2014. During this period, EPA received one comment letter from a member
of the public. The letter is available in the docket to today's final
rule. Today's final action includes EPA's response to this comment.

II. What is the background for the approvals by EPA in this final rule?

    This section briefly summarizes the background for today's final
action. More detailed discussion of the statutory and regulatory
background can be found in the preamble to the proposal for this
rulemaking. (79 FR 1350, January 8, 2014.)
    The Missouri rule establishes emission rate limits using current
reporting requirements for both large stationary diesel engines and
dual fuel IC engines and adds a twenty-five ton NOX
exemption.
    Any compression ignited stationary engine that begins operation
after September 30, 1997, and emits twenty-five (25) tons or less of
NOX during the period from May 1 through September 30 is
exempt from certain emission rate limits found at 10 CSR 10-
6.390(3)(B)3 and 4. This exemption is based on the previous year's
NOX emissions during the May 1 through September 30 period.
If the exemption limit is exceeded, for any reason, the engine in
question will be required to meet the applicable limits of subsection
(3)(B) each year thereafter. The exemption does not apply to the record
keeping and reporting requirements of 10 CSR 10-6.390(4).
    Section 110(l) of the CAA states that EPA shall not approve a
revision of a SIP if the revisions would interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress, or
any other applicable requirement of the CAA. The state's SIP revision
included a demonstration that this twenty-five ton NOX
exemption for compression ignited stationary IC engines will not
adversely impact air quality. The analysis, included in the docket for
today's action, also showed that the exemption will not affect the
state's ability to meet its NOX SIP Call obligations.
    EPA has reviewed the state's analysis of the potential impacts of
this NOX exemption on air quality and has determined that
the twenty-five ton NOX exemption in 10 CSR 10-6.390 will
not adversely impact air quality and will not affect the state's
ability to meet its NOX SIP Call obligations, previously
approved in a separate action on August 15, 2006 (71 FR 46860).

III. EPA's Response to Comment

    The public comment period on EPA's proposed rule opened January 8,
2014, the date of its publication in the Federal Register, and closed
on February 7, 2014. During this period, EPA received one comment from
a citizen, and the comment letter is available in the docket to today's
final rule. Today's final action includes EPA's response to the
comment.
    Comment: The citizen commented, among other things, that Missouri's
allowable NOx budget should be revised and subsequently a SIP revision
should be requested to reflect the lower emissions ceiling.
    Response: EPA would like to thank the citizen for the comment, but
disagrees with the Commenter's view. EPA's NOX emissions
budgets were set under the final Federal Phase II NOX SIP
Call (69 FR 21604, April 21, 2004). The budgets were an accounting
mechanism for ensuring that upwind states have adopted and are
implementing control measures that will address their significant
contribution to downwind nonattainment, and interference with
maintenance areas in other states for the 1-hour and the 1997 8-hour
ozone standard. These budgets have been set through notice-and-comment
rulemaking and EPA has already determined that Missouri has met its
obligation under the Phase II NOX SIP call (71 FR 46860,
August 15, 2006).

IV. EPA's Final Action

    In today's rulemaking, EPA is taking final action to approve a
revision to the Missouri SIP to control NOX emissions from
large stationary internal combustion engines. The revisions will also
add a NOX exemption for compression ignited stationary
internal combustion engines that emit 25 tons or less of NOX
during the ozone season. If this level is exceeded, the regular
emission rate limits in the regulation would apply. The requirements
prescribed in the SIP revision are consistent with the April 21, 2004,
final Federal Phase II NOX SIP Call. EPA has determined that
the SIP submitted by the State of Missouri satisfies the applicable
requirements of the CAA.

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
final action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason, this final action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the terms
of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is
therefore not subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
(76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or

safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by September 16, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: July 1, 2014.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency proposes to amend 40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart AA--Missouri

0
2. Section 52.1320 table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising the
entry for ``Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and
Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State
of Missouri'' ``10-6.390'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1320  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                        EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          State effective
       Missouri citation                  Title                 date       EPA approval date      Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control
                                                   Regulations
                                            for the State of Missouri
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
10-6.390.......................  Control of NOX               05/30/2010   07/18/2014         ..................
                                  Emissions from Large                      [insert Federal
                                  Stationary Internal                       Register page
                                  Combustion Engines.                       number where the
                                                                            document begins].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2014-16831 Filed 7-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 153 (Friday, August 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48057-48058]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17269]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket Number: FAA 2020-0752]

Service Difficulty Report; Agency Information Collection
Activities: Requests for Comments; Clearance of a Renewed Approval of
Information Collection: 49 U.S.C. 44701/Service Difficulty Report

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA

invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The collection involves operators or repair stations report
any malfunctions and defects to the Administrator. The information
collected allows the FAA to evaluate its certification standards,
maintenance programs, and regulatory requirements. It is also the basis
for issuance of Airworthiness Directives designed to prevent unsafe
conditions and accidents.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by October 6, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Please send written comments:
    By Electronic Docket: www.regulations.gov (Enter docket number into
search field).
    By mail: Federal Aviation Administration, Attn: Aviation Data
Systems Branch, AFS-620 (SDRS/MorD), P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK
73125-0082.
    By fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Graciela S. Robino by email at:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0663.
    Title: Service Difficulty Report.
    Form Numbers:
FAA Form 8070-1
FAA Form 8010-4
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: This collection affects certificate holders operating
under 14 CFR part 121, 125, 135, and 145 who are required to report
service difficulties and malfunction or defect reports. The data
collected identifies mechanical failures, malfunctions, and defects
that may be a hazard to the operation of an aircraft. The FAA uses this
data to identify trends that may facilitate the early detection of
airworthiness problems. When defects are reported which are likely to
exist on other products of the same or similar design, the FAA may
disseminate safety information to a particular section of the aviation
community.
    Respondents: Approximately 60,000 respondents.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 15,000.

    Issued in Greensboro, NC, on July 29, 2020.
Graciela S. Robino,
SDR Program Manager, Regulatory Support Division, Flight Standards
Service, Office of Aviation Safety, AFS-620.
[FR Doc. 2020-17269 Filed 8-6-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: December 15, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 239)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 66259-66260]
[DOCID:fr15de09-22]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 261

[RCRA--2003-0004; FRL-9092-6]
RIN 2050-AE51

Hazardous Waste Management System: Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste: Conditional Exclusion From Hazardous Waste and Solid
Waste for Solvent-Contaminated Industrial Wipes; Extension of Comment
Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Data availability; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is extending the
comment period for the document entitled ``Conditional Exclusion from
Hazardous and Solid Waste for Solvent-

Contaminated Industrial Wipes,'' which appeared in the Federal Register
on October 27, 2009. The public comment period for this document was to
close on December 28, 2009. The purpose of this document is to extend
the comment period for 60 days until February 26, 2010.

DATES: EPA will accept public comments on the Notice of Data
Availability (NODA) published October 27, 2009 (74 FR 55163), until
February 26, 2010. Comments submitted after this date will be marked
``late'' and may not be considered.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
RCRA-2003-0004 by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Attention Docket No. EPA-HQ-
RCRA-2003-0004.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Attention Docket No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2003-
0004.
     Mail: Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center
(EPA/DC), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Docket, 2822T,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, Attention Docket
No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2003-0004. Please include 2 copies.
     Hand Delivery: Public Reading Room, EPA West, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC, Attention Docket No. EPA-
HQ-RCRA-2003-0004. Such deliveries are only accepted during the
docket's normal hours, and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-
2003-0004. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not send information you
consider CBI or that is otherwise protected through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment direct to EPA without going
through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
send an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you send. If EPA cannot read your comment because of
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For more information about EPA's public docket,
visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/
dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading
Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the RCRA Docket is
(202) 566-0270.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teena Wooten, Office of Resource
Conservation and Recovery (ORCR),<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Direct mail inquiries to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, (Mailstop 5304P), 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject of this notice is to extend the
time to comment on a revised risk analysis for solvent contaminated
wipes. The revised risk analysis was developed in support of a rule
proposed on November 20, 2003 (68 FR 65586). The revised risk analysis
and supporting documents are available through http://
www.regulations.gov under docket EPA-HQ-RCRA-2003-0004 and http://
www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/wastetypes/wasteid/solvents/wipes.htm.
    On November 20, 2003, EPA proposed to: (1) Conditionally exclude
from the definition of solid waste industrial wipes contaminated with
solvent and sent to laundries or dry cleaners for cleaning and reuse
and (2) conditionally exclude from the definition of hazardous waste
industrial wipes contaminated with solvent and sent to disposal. The
proposed rule is available through http://www.regulations.gov under
docket EPA-HQ-RCRA-0004 and http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/
wastetypes/wasteid/solvents/wipes.htm.
    The comment period for the NODA was scheduled to close on December
28, 2009. However, EPA received a request to extend the comment period
to allow the requester additional time to review the available
information. In addition, EPA recently updated its contact list used to
notify stakeholders when Federal Register notices about rulemaking
activities in the areas of hazardous waste regulations are published.
Extending the comment period responds to the commenter's request and
allows recent additions to the contact list time to comment on the
revised risk analysis. EPA has also received a request for the
mathematical models and input/output files used to develop the revised
risk analysis. Although this information is not necessary for review of
the revised risk analysis, you may obtain a copy of the mathematical
models and input/output files upon request through the contact listed
above. EPA also notes that this rule is not subject to any statutory or
judicial deadlines. We are therefore extending the comment period for
this NODA until February 26, 2010.

    Dated: December 9, 2009.
Matthew Hale,
Director, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery.
[FR Doc. E9-29804 Filed 12-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: November 28, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 228)]
[Notices]
[Page 67328-67332]
[DOCID:fr28no07-76]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-56832; File No. SR-NYSEArca-02007-102]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change to
Trade Units of the United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP and the United
States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LP Pursuant to Unlisted Trading
Privileges

November 21, 2007.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 2, 2007, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange''), through its
wholly owned subsidiary, NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. (``NYSE Arca
Equities''), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the Exchange.
This order provides notice of the proposed rule change and approves the
proposed rule change on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to trade pursuant to unlisted trading
privileges (``UTP'') units (``Units'') of the United States 12 Month
Oil Fund, LP (``12 Month Oil Fund'') and the United States 12 Month
Natural Gas Fund, LP (``12 Month Natural Gas Fund'') (each, a
``Partnership,'' and collectively, the ``Partnerships''). The text of
the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's principal
office, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and http://
www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item III below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Under NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.300, which sets forth criteria to
permit the trading of Partnership Units \3\ either by listing or
pursuant to UTP, the Exchange proposes to trade pursuant to UTP the
Units of each Partnership. The Commission has approved the listing and
trading of such Units on the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.300(b)(2) defines Partnership
Units as securities issued by a partnership that invests in any
combination of futures contracts, options on futures contracts,
forward contracts, commodities, and/or securities and that are
redeemed daily in specified aggregate amounts at net asset value
(``NAV'').
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56831 (November 21,
2007) (SR-Amex-2007-98) (granting approval to list and trade the
Units on Amex); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56719 (October
29, 2007), 72 FR 62277 (November 2, 2007) (SR-Amex-2007-98)
(providing notice of Amex's proposal to list and trade the Units)
(``Amex Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Ownership of each Partnership Unit represents a fractional
undivided unit of a beneficial interest in the net assets of the
applicable Partnership.\5\ The net assets of each of the Partnerships
will consist primarily of investments in futures contracts for crude
oil, heating oil, gasoline, natural gas, and other petroleum-based
fuels that are traded on

the New York Mercantile Exchange (``NYMEX''), Intercontinental Exchange
(``ICE Futures''), or other U.S. and foreign exchanges (collectively,
the ``Futures Contracts''). In the case of the 12 Month Oil Fund, the
predominant investments are expected to be based on, or related to,
crude oil. Similarly, for the 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, the
predominant investments are expected to be based on, or related to,
natural gas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Each Partnership is a commodity pool that will issue Units
that may be purchased and sold on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The investment objective of the 12 Month Oil Fund is for the
changes in percentage terms of a Unit's NAV to reflect the changes in
percentage terms of the price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to
Cushing, Oklahoma, as measured by the changes in the average prices of
12 crude oil futures contracts traded on NYMEX (the ``Oil Benchmark
Futures Contracts''), less the 12 Month Oil Fund's expenses. The
investment objective of the 12 Month Natural Gas Fund is for changes in
percentage terms of a Unit's NAV to reflect the changes in percentage
terms of the price of natural gas delivered to Henry Hub, Louisiana, as
measured by the changes in the average of the prices of 12 futures
contracts on natural gas traded on NYMEX (the ``Natural Gas Benchmark
Futures Contracts''), less the 12 Month Natural Gas Fund's expenses.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ A detailed discussion of the crude oil, gasoline, heating
oil, and natural gas markets; futures regulation and the structure
and regulation of the Partnerships; investment strategies (including
specific crude oil- and natural gas-related investments),
objectives, procedures, and policies; impact of accountability and
position limits on the Futures Contracts; creations and redemptions
of baskets of Units; arbitrage; Partnership termination events; and
calculation methodology of the NAV for the Units, among others, can
be found in the Amex Notice. In addition, information regarding the
Partnerships and the investment manager for each Partnership, the
manner in which the Units will be offered and sold, and the
investment strategy of the 12 Month Oil Fund and the 12 Month
Natural Gas Fund is included in respective registration statements
of the Partnerships regarding the offering of the Units filed with
the Commission under the Securities Act of 1933. See 12 Month Oil
Fund Form S-1 filed July 5, 2007, as amended (File No. 333-144348);
12 Month Natural Gas Fund Form S-1 filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-
144409).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange represents that quotes and last-sale information for
the Futures Contracts are widely disseminated through a variety of
market data vendors worldwide. The daily settlement prices for the
NYMEX-traded Futures Contracts are publicly available on the NYMEX Web
site at http://www.nymex.com, and real-time futures data is available
by subscription from various financial information services. NYMEX also
provides delayed futures information on current and past trading
sessions and market news free of charge on its Web site. The specific
contract specifications for the Futures Contracts are also available on
the NYMEX Web site and the ICE Futures Web site at http://
www.icefutures.com.
    Amex will disseminate through the facilities of the Consolidated
Tape Association (``CTA'') an updated Indicative Partnership Value
(``Indicative Partnership Value''). The Indicative Partnership Value
for each Partnership will be disseminated on a per-Unit basis at least
every 15 seconds during the regular trading hours from 9:30 a.m. to
4:15 p.m. Eastern Time (``ET''). The Indicative Partnership Value is
based on open-outcry trading of the relevant Oil or Natural Gas
Benchmark Futures Contracts on NYMEX. Open outcry trading on NYMEX
closes daily at 2:30 p.m. ET, while NYMEX's energy futures contracts
are traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange's CME Globex[reg]
electronic trading platform on a 24-hour basis.\7\ After the close of
open outcry on NYMEX at 2:30 p.m. ET, the Indicative Partnership Value
will reflect changes to the relevant Benchmark Futures Contracts as
provided for through CME Globex[reg]. The value of the relevant
Benchmark Futures Contracts will be available on a 15-second delayed
basis from 9:30 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. ET.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ CME Globex[reg] (``Globex'') is an open-access marketplace
that operates virtually 24 hours each trading day. Electronic
trading on Globex is conducted from 6 p.m. ET Sunday through 5:15
p.m. ET Friday each week. There is a 45-minute break each day
between 5:15 p.m. ET and 6 p.m. ET.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While NYMEX is open for trading, the Indicative Partnership Value
can be expected to closely approximate the value per Unit of the Basket
Amount. However, during Exchange trading hours when the Futures
Contracts have ceased trading in NYMEX's open outcry, spreads and
resulting premiums or discounts may widen and, therefore, increase the
difference between the price of the Units and the NAV of the Units. The
Exchange submits that the Indicative Partnership Value disseminated
from 9:30 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. ET, on a per-Unit basis, should not be
viewed as a real-time update of the NAV, which is calculated only once
daily.
    Amex will make available on its Web site at http://www.amex.com the
following information: (1) The prior business day's NAV and the
reported closing price; (2) the mid-point of the bid-ask price in
relation to the NAV as of the time the NAV is calculated (``Bid-Ask
Price''); \8\ (3) calculation of the premium or discount of such price
against such NAV; (4) data in chart form displaying the frequency
distribution of discounts and premiums of the Bid-Ask Price against the
NAV, within appropriate ranges for each of the four previous calendar
quarters; (5) the prospectus and the most recent periodic reports filed
with the Commission or required by the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (``CFTC''); and (6) other applicable quantitative
information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The Bid-Ask Price of Units is determined using the highest
bid and lowest offer as of the time of calculation of the NAV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The total portfolio composition of the 12 Month Oil Fund and the 12
Month Natural Gas Fund will be disclosed each business day that Amex is
open for trading on their respective Web sites at http://
www.unitedstates12monthoilfund.com and http://
www.unitedstates12monthnaturalgasfund.com. The 12 Month Oil Fund's Web
site disclosure of portfolio holdings will be made daily and will
include, as applicable, the name and value of each Futures Contract and
other crude oil-related investments (``Crude Oil Interests''), the
specific types and characteristics of the Crude Oil Interests, short-
term obligations of the United States of two years or less
(``Treasuries''), and the amount of cash and cash equivalents held in
the portfolio of the 12 Month Oil Fund. The 12 Month Natural Gas Fund's
Web site disclosure of portfolio holdings will be made daily and will
include, as applicable, the name and value of each Futures Contract and
other natural gas-related investments (``Natural Gas Interests''), the
specific types and characteristics of the Natural Gas Interests,
Treasuries, and the amount of cash and cash equivalents held in the
portfolio of the 12 Month Natural Gas Fund.
    The public Web site disclosure of the portfolio composition of each
of the 12 Month Oil Fund and the 12 Month Natural Gas Fund will
coincide with the disclosure on each business day of the NAV for the
applicable Units and the Basket Amount \9\ (for orders placed during
the day) for each Partnership. Therefore, the same portfolio
information will be provided on the public Web site for each
Partnership as well as in the facsimile or e-mail

message to Authorized Purchasers containing the NAV and Basket Amount
(``Daily Dissemination''). The format of the public Web site disclosure
and the Daily Dissemination will differ because the public Web site
will list all portfolio holdings while the Daily Dissemination will
provide the portfolio holdings in a format appropriate for Authorized
Purchasers, i.e., the exact components of a Creation Unit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ A ``Basket Amount'' is the amount equal to the NAV per Unit,
times 100,000 Units (each such aggregation of Units, a ``Basket'')
calculated for the purpose of issuing Baskets to Authorized
Purchasers. See Amex Notice, supra note 4, 72 FR at 62283. An
``Authorized Purchaser'' is a person, who, at the time of submitting
an order to create or redeem Units, is (1) a registered broker-
dealer or other market participant, such as a bank or other
financial institution, that is exempt from broker-dealer
registration; and (2) a Depository Trust Company participant. See
Amex Notice, supra note 4, 72 FR at 62282 n.14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Each Partnership's NAV will be calculated and disseminated
daily.\10\ Amex disseminates for each Partnership on a daily basis by
means of the CTA/Consolidated Quote (``CQ'') High Speed Lines
information with respect to the Indicative Partnership Value, recent
NAV, Units outstanding, Basket Amount, and Deposit Amount.\11\ Amex
will also make available on its Web site daily trading volume, closing
prices, and the NAV for the Units.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Amex will obtain a representation from each Partnership
that the respective NAV per Unit will be calculated daily and made
available to all market participants at the same time. See Amex
Notice, supra note 4, 72 FR at 62283 n.18.
    \11\ The ``Deposit Amount'' is the amount transferred from a
purchaser to Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. for the purpose of
purchasing a Basket of Units. See Amex Notice, supra note 4, 72 FR
at 62283.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange represents that it will cease trading the Units of a
Partnership if the listing market stops trading the Units. The Exchange
states further that UTP trading in the Units is governed by the trading
halts provisions of NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.34 relating to temporary
interruptions in the calculation or wide dissemination of an Indicative
Partnership Value or the value of the applicable underlying Benchmark
Futures Contracts.\12\ In addition, the Exchange may consider all
relevant factors in exercising its discretion to halt or suspend
trading in the Units. Trading may be halted because of market
conditions or for reasons that, in the view of the Exchange, make
trading in the Units inadvisable. These may include: (1) The extent to
which trading is not occurring in the underlying Futures Contracts; or
(2) whether other unusual conditions or circumstances detrimental to
the maintenance of a fair and orderly market are present. In addition,
trading in the Units could be halted pursuant to the Exchange's
``circuit breaker'' rule \13\ or by the halt or suspension of trading
of the underlying securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The Exchange states that NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.34(a)
literally addresses temporary interruptions in the calculation or
wide dissemination of the Indicative Intra-Day Value and the value
of an underlying index. The Units of each Partnership, however, do
not have an underlying index, but have underlying Benchmark Futures
Contracts. Therefore, the Exchange hereby represents that the
provisions in NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.34(a) that address
interruptions in the calculation or wide dissemination of the value
of an underlying index shall also apply, in this case, to
interruptions in the calculation or wide dissemination of the value
of the underlying Benchmark Futures Contracts.
    \13\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange deems the Units to be equity securities, thus
rendering trading in the Units subject to the Exchange's existing rules
governing the trading of equity securities. Units will trade on the
Exchange from 4 a.m. to 8 p.m. ET in accordance with NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 7.34 (Opening, Core, and Late Trading Sessions). The Exchange
represents that it has appropriate rules to facilitate transactions in
the Units during all trading sessions.
    The Exchange intends to utilize its existing surveillance
procedures applicable to derivative products to monitor trading in the
Units. The Exchange represents that these procedures are adequate to
properly monitor Exchange trading of the Units in all trading sessions
and to deter and detect violations of Exchange rules. The Exchange
notes that NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.300(e) sets forth certain
restrictions on ETP Holders \14\ acting as registered Market Makers in
Units to facilitate surveillance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ ``ETP Holder'' means a sole proprietorship, partnership,
corporation, limited liability company, or other organization in
good standing that has been issued an Equity Trading Permit or
``ETP.'' An ETP Holder must be a registered broker or dealer
pursuant to Section 15 of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78o(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange may obtain information via the Intermarket
Surveillance Group (``ISG'') from other exchanges who are members or
affiliates of the ISG. In addition, the Exchange has an information
sharing agreement in place with each of NYMEX and ICE Futures for the
purpose of providing information in connection with trading in or
related to futures contracts traded on NYMEX and ICE Futures,
respectively. To the extent that a Partnership invests in Crude Oil
Interests or Natural Gas Interests traded on other exchanges, the
Exchange will seek to enter into information sharing agreements with
those particular exchanges.
    Prior to the commencement of trading, the Exchange will inform its
ETP Holders in an Information Bulletin (``Bulletin'') of the special
characteristics and risks associated with trading the Units.
Specifically, the Bulletin will discuss the following: (1) The risks
involved in trading the Units during the Opening and Late Trading
Sessions when an updated Indicative Partnership Value will not be
calculated or publicly disseminated; \15\ (2) the procedures for
purchases and redemptions of Units in Baskets (and that Units are not
individually redeemable); (3) NYSE Arca Equities Rule 9.2(a), which
imposes a duty of due diligence on its ETP Holders to learn the
essential facts relating to every customer prior to trading the Units;
(4) how information regarding the Indicative Partnership Value is
disseminated; (5) the requirement that ETP Holders deliver a prospectus
to investors purchasing newly issued Units prior to or concurrently
with the confirmation of a transaction; and (6) trading information. In
addition, the Bulletin will reference that each Partnership is subject
to various fees and expenses described in the relevant registration
statement; there is no regulated source of last-sale information
regarding physical commodities; the Commission has no jurisdiction over
the trading of crude oil, natural gas, heating oil, gasoline, or other
petroleum-based fuels; and the CFTC has regulatory jurisdiction over
the trading of crude-oil-based and natural-gas-based futures contracts
and related options. The Bulletin will also discuss any exemptive, no-
action, or interpretive relief granted by the Commission from any rules
under the Act. The Bulletin will also disclose that the NAV for the
Units will be calculated after 4 p.m. ET each trading day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See NYSE Arca Equities rule 7.34(e) (Customer Disclosures).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\16\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\17\ in particular, in that it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system.
In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Rule 12f-5 under the Act \18\ because the Exchange
deems the Units to be equity securities, thus rendering trading in the
Units subject to the Exchange's existing rules governing the trading of
equity securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \18\ 17 CFR 240.12f-5.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited
nor received.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2007-102 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2007-102. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2007-102 and should
be submitted on or before December 19, 2007.

IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
the Proposed Rule Change

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange.\19\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\20\ which
requires that an exchange have rules designed, among other things, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest. The Commission believes that this proposal should benefit
investors by increasing competition among markets that trade the Units.
The Commission notes that it previously approved for trading on the
Exchange pursuant to UTP Partnership Units issued by the United States
Oil Fund, LP and the United States Natural Gas Fund, LP, which are
similar to the Units that the Exchange proposes to trade herein.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ In approving this rule change, the Commission notes that it
has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \21\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53875 (May 25,
2006), 71 FR 32164 (June 2, 2006) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-11) (approving
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.300 and the trading of Partnership Units
of the United States Oil Fund, LP pursuant to UTP); Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 56042 (July 11, 2007), 72 FR 39118 (July
17, 2007) (SR-NYSEArca-2007-45) (approving the trading of
Partnership Units of the United States Natural Gas Fund, LP pursuant
to UTP).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent
with Section 12(f) of the Act,\22\ which permits an exchange to trade,
pursuant to UTP, a security that is listed and registered on another
exchange.\23\ The Commission notes that it has approved the original
listing and trading of the Units on Amex.\24\ The Commission finds that
the proposal is consistent with Rule 12f-5 under the Act,\25\ which
provides that an exchange shall not extend UTP to a security unless the
exchange has in effect a rule or rules providing for transactions in
the class or type of security to which the exchange extends UTP. The
Exchange has represented that it meets this requirement because it
deems the Units to be equity securities, thus rendering trading in the
Units subject to the Exchange's existing rules governing the trading of
equity securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(f).
    \23\ Section 12(a) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78l(a), generally
prohibits a broker-dealer from trading a security on a national
securities exchange unless the security is registered on that
exchange pursuant to Section 12 of the Act. Section 12(f) of the Act
excludes from this restriction trading in any security to which an
exchange ``extends UTP.'' When an exchange extends UTP to a
security, it allows its members to trade the security as if it were
listed and registered on the exchange even though it is not so
listed and registered.
    \24\ See supra note 4.
    \25\ 17 CFR 240.12f-5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission further believes that the proposal is consistent
with Section 11A(a)(1)(C)(iii) of the Act,\26 \which sets forth
Congress' finding that it is in the public interest and appropriate for
the protection of investors and the maintenance of fair and orderly
markets to assure the availability to brokers, dealers, and investors
of information with respect to quotations for and transactions in
securities. Quotations for and last-sale information regarding the
Units will be disseminated through the Consolidated Quotation System
and CTA, respectively.\27\ In addition, Amex will disseminate a variety
of information for each Partnership on a daily basis through the
facilities of the CTA/CQ High Speed Lines including the Indicative
Partnership Value on a per-Unit basis, at least every 15 seconds during
regular Amex trading hours, the recent NAV, the number of Units
outstanding, the Basket Amount, and the Deposit Amount. The daily
closing and settlement prices for the NYMEX-traded Futures Contracts
held by each Partnership, delayed futures information on current and
past trading sessions, and market news are publicly available on the
NYMEX Web site. Quotations and last-sale information for the Futures
Contracts are widely disseminated through a variety of market data
vendors worldwide. Amex's Web site contains information related to the
NAV, the premium or discount of the Bid-Ask Price against the NAV, the
prospectus and other periodically-filed reports, daily trading volume
data, Unit

closing prices, and other quantitative information. Finally, the 12
Month Oil Fund and the 12 Month Natural Gas Fund's Web sites will
disclose, on each business day that the Amex is open for trading, the
total portfolio composition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1)(C)(iii).
    \27\ E-mail from Timothy J. Malinowski, Director, NYSE Euronext,
to Edward Cho, Special Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets,
Commission, dated November 15, 2007 (confirming the dissemination of
information concerning quotations and last-sale information).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission also believes that the Exchange's trading halt rules
are reasonably designed to prevent trading in the Units when
transparency is impaired. Existing NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.34(a)(4),
which will apply to the trading of the Units, provides that, if the
Benchmark Futures Contract or Indicative Partnership Value is no longer
calculated or disseminated as required (a) during the Opening Session
(4 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. ET), the Exchange may continue to trade the Units
for the remainder of the Opening Session; (b) during the Core Trading
Session (9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. ET), the Exchange must halt trading in the
Units; and (c) during the Late Trading Session (4 p.m. to 8 p.m. ET),
the Exchange may continue trading in the Units only if the original
listing market traded such Units until the close of its regular trading
session without halt. If the Benchmark Futures Contract or Indicative
Partnership Value continues not to be calculated or disseminated as of
the next business day's Opening Session, the Exchange will not commence
trading in the Units in such Opening Session.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ The Exchange may resume trading in the Units only if the
calculation and dissemination of the Benchmark Futures Contract or
Indicative Partnership Value resumes, or trading in the Units
resumes in the original listing market. See NYSE Arca Equities Rule
7.34(a)(4)(C)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission notes that, if the Units should be delisted by the
listing exchange, the Exchange would no longer have authority to trade
the Units pursuant to this order.
    In support of this proposal, the Exchange has made the following
representations:
    (1) The Exchange's surveillance procedures are adequate to properly
monitor the trading of the Units on a UTP basis during all trading
sessions.
    (2) The Exchange would inform its ETP Holders in an Information
Bulletin of the special characteristics and risks associated with
trading the Units, including risks inherent with trading the Units
during the Opening and Late Trading Sessions when the updated
Indicative Partnership Value is not calculated and disseminated and
suitability recommendation requirements.
    (3) The Exchange would require its members to deliver a prospectus
to investors purchasing Units prior to or concurrently with a
transaction in such Units and will note this prospectus delivery
requirement in the Information Bulletin.
    This approval order is based on the Exchange's representations.
    The Commission finds good cause for approving this proposal before
the thirtieth day after the publication of notice thereof in the
Federal Register. As noted above, the Commission has approved the
original listing and trading of the Units on Amex.\29\ The Commission
presently is not aware of any regulatory issue that should cause it to
revisit that finding or would preclude the trading of the Units on the
Exchange pursuant to UTP. Accelerating approval of this proposal should
benefit investors by creating, without undue delay, additional
competition in the market for such Units.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ See supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\30\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEArca-2007-102) be, and
it hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-23112 Filed 11-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52678-52680]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18897]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[AMS-FRL-9950-45-OAR]

California State Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Standards;
Amendments to On-Highway Heavy-Duty Vehicle In-Use Compliance Program,
Amendments to 2007 and Subsequent Model Year On-Highway Heavy-Duty
Engines and Vehicles, and Amendments to Truck Requirements; Request for
Waiver of Preemption; Opportunity for Public Hearing and Public Comment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of opportunity for public hearing and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has notified EPA
that it has adopted a series of amendments to its on-highway heavy-duty
vehicle and engine regulations. The amendments to CARB's in-use
compliance program align CARB's program with EPA's program in terms of
measurement allowances during on-road testing (In-Use Amendments). The
amendments to CARB's 2007 and subsequent model year (MY) regulation
(2007 Amendments) are minor technical amendments regarding mathematical
expression of emission results and certain compliance flexibilities.
The amendments to CARB's truck idling requirements (Truck Idling
Amendments) clarify that certain vehicles are exempt from the new
vehicle requirements. By letter dated January 27, 2016, CARB submitted
a

request that EPA grant a full waiver of preemption under section 209(b)
of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7543(b) for the In-Use
Amendments. CARB separately seeks EPA's confirmation that the 2007
Amendments and the Truck Idling Amendments are within the scope of
prior EPA waiver decisions. This notice announces that EPA has
scheduled a public hearing concerning California's request and that EPA
is accepting written comment on the request.

DATES: EPA has tentatively scheduled a public hearing concerning CARB's
request on September 28, 2016, at 10 a.m. EPA will hold a hearing only
if any party notifies EPA by September 21, 2016 to express interest in
presenting the Agency with oral testimony. Parties wishing to present
oral testimony at the public hearing should provide written notice to
David Dickinson at the email address noted below. If EPA receives a
request for a public hearing, that hearing will be held at the William
Jefferson Clinton Building (North), Room 5528 at 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460. If EPA does not receive a request for a
public hearing, then EPA will not hold a hearing, and instead will
consider CARB's request based on written submissions to the docket. Any
party may submit written comments until November 1, 2016.
    Any person who wishes to know whether a hearing will be held may
call David Dickinson at<PHONE_NUMBER> on or after September 21, 2016.

ADDRESSES: EPA will make available for in person inspection, at the Air
and Radiation Docket and Information Center, written comments received
from interested parties, in addition to any testimony given at the
public hearing. The official public docket is the collection of
materials that is available for public viewing at the Air and Radiation
Docket in the EPA Docket Center, (EPA/DC) EPA West, Room B102, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading
Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the Air and
Radiation Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. The reference number for this
docket is EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0017.
    EPA will make available an electronic copy of this Notice on the
Office of Transportation and Air Quality's (OTAQ's) homepage (http://www.epa.gov/otaq/). Users can find this document by accessing the OTAQ
homepage and looking at the path entitled ``Regulations.'' This service
is free of charge, except any cost you already incur for Internet
connectivity. Users can also get the official Federal Register version
of the Notice on the day of publication on the primary Web site:
(http://www.epa.gov/docs/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/).
    Please note that due to differences between the software used to
develop the documents and the software into which the documents may be
downloaded, changes in format, page length, etc., may occur.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Dickinson (6405J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
For Obtaining and Submitting Electronic Copies of Comments

    Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-
0017, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA West (Air
Docket), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Room B108, Mail Code 6102T,
Washington, DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0017.
Please include a total of two copies.
     Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room
B102, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No EPA-HQ-
OAR-2016-0017.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or
email.
    The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an email comment directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov your email address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

(A) CARB's Waiver Request and Within-the-Scope Request

    CARB's January 27, 2016, letter to the Administrator presents EPA
with CARB's series of amendments related to the control of emissions
from California on-road medium- and heavy-duty engines and vehicles.
The In-Use Amendments include amendments adopted by CARB in 2011 that
allow a measurement allowance of 0.006 grams per brake horsepower-hour
(g/bhp-hr) when using portable emission measurement systems (PEMS) for
on-road in-use testing of heavy-duty vehicles. The 2007 Amendments are
minor technical amendments regarding mathematical expression of
emission results and certain compliance flexibilities. These amendments
specify the NOx emission standards to the correct number of significant
digits (e.g. 0.2 g/bhp-hr is now expressed as 0.20 g/bhp-hr for NOx).
The 2007 Amendments also make corrections to the formaldehyde standards
for medium-duty diesel vehicles, harmonize labeling requirements with
EPA's requirements, maintain consistency with deterioration factors
between CARB and EPA, and provide manufacturers with certain compliance
flexibilities for the 2007 through 2009 model years. The Truck Idling
Amendments clarify that new

engine provisions do not apply to armored cars and workover rigs.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ A further description of the CARB amendments can be found in
CARB's Waiver Support document in docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Scope of Preemption and Criteria for a Waiver Under the Clean Air
Act

    Section 209(a) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (``Act''), 42
U.S.C. 7543(a), provides:

    No state or any political subdivision thereof shall adopt or
attempt to enforce any standard relating to the control of emissions
from new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines subject to this
part. No state shall require certification, inspection or any other
approval relating to the control of emissions from any new motor
vehicle or new motor vehicle engine as condition precedent to the
initial retail sale, titling (if any), or registration of such motor
vehicle, motor vehicle engine, or equipment.

    Section 209(b) of the Act requires the Administrator, after notice
and opportunity for public hearing, to waive application of the
prohibitions of section 209(a) for any state that has adopted standards
(other than crankcase emission standards) for the control of emissions
from new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines prior to March 30,
1966, if the state determines that the state standards will be, in the
aggregate, at least as protective of public health and welfare as
applicable federal standards. California is the only state that is
qualified to seek and receive a waiver under section 209(b). EPA must
grant a waiver unless the Administrator finds that (A) the
determination of the state is arbitrary and capricious, (B) the state
does not need the state standards to meet compelling and extraordinary
conditions, or (C) the state standards and accompanying enforcement
procedures are not consistent with section 202(a) of the Act. Previous
decisions granting waivers of federal preemption for motor vehicles
have maintained that state standards are inconsistent with section
202(a) if there is inadequate lead time to permit the development of
the necessary technology giving appropriate consideration to the cost
of compliance within that time period or if the federal and state test
procedures impose inconsistent certification procedures.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ To be consistent, the California certification procedures
need not be identical to the federal certification procedures.
California procedures would be inconsistent, however, if
manufacturers would be unable to meet the state and the federal
requirements with the same test vehicle in the course of the same
test. See, e.g., 43 FR 32182 (July 25, 1978).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If California amends regulations that were previously granted a
waiver, EPA can confirm that the amended regulations are within the
scope of the previously granted waiver. Such within-the-scope
amendments are permissible without a full waiver review if three
conditions are met. First, the amended regulations must not undermine
California's determination that its standards, in the aggregate, are as
protective of public health and welfare as applicable federal
standards. Second, the amended regulations must not affect consistency
with section 202(a) of the Act. Third, the amended regulations must not
raise any ``new issues'' affecting EPA's prior waivers.

(C) Request for Comment

    First, EPA requests comment on whether the 2007 Amendments and the
Truck Idling Amendments, each individually assessed, should be
considered under the within-the-scope analysis or whether they should
be considered under the full waiver criteria. Specifically, we request
comment on whether the 2007 Amendments and the Truck Idling Amendments
(1) undermine California's previous determination that its standards,
in the aggregate, are at least as protective of public health and
welfare as comparable Federal standards, (2) affect the consistency of
California's requirements with section 202(a) of the Act, and (3) raise
any other ``new issue'' affecting EPA's previous waiver or
authorization determinations.
    For the In-Use Amendments and to the extent commenters believe the
2007 Amendments or the Truck Idling Amendments should be considered
under the full waiver criteria, EPA invites comment under the following
three criteria: Whether (a) California's determination that its motor
vehicle emission standards are, in the aggregate, at least as
protective of public health and welfare as applicable federal standards
is arbitrary and capricious, (b) California needs such standards to
meet compelling and extraordinary conditions, and (c) California's
standards and accompanying enforcement procedures are consistent with
section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act.

Procedures for Public Participation

    The Agency will make a verbatim record of the proceedings.
Interested parties may arrange with the reporter at the hearing to
obtain a copy of the transcript at their own expense. EPA will keep the
record open until November 1, 2016. Upon expiration of the comment
period, the Administrator will render a decision on CARB's request
based on the record of the public hearing, relevant written
submissions, and other information that she deems pertinent.
    Persons with comments containing proprietary information must
distinguish such information from other comments to the greatest
possible extent and label it as ``Confidential Business Information''
(CBI). If a person making comments wants EPA to base its decision in
part on a submission labeled CBI, then a non-confidential version of
the document that summarizes the key data or information should be
submitted for the public docket. To ensure that proprietary information
is not inadvertently placed in the docket, submissions containing such
information should be sent directly to the contact person listed above
and not to the public docket. Information covered by a claim of
confidentiality will be disclosed by EPA only to the extent allowed and
by the procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. If no claim of
confidentiality accompanies the submission when EPA receives it, EPA
will make it available to the public without further notice to the
person making comments.

    Dated: August 4, 2016.
Christopher Grundler, Director,
Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2016-18897 Filed 8-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67465-67467]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24334]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC23-17-000.
    Applicants: RWE Aktiengesellschaft, Consolidated Edison, Inc., RWE
Renewables Americas, LLC, Con Edison Clean Energy Businesses, Inc.,
Alpaugh 50, LLC, Battle Mountain SP, LLC, Broken Bow Wind II, LLC,
Campbell County Wind Farm, LLC, CED Timberland Solar, LLC, CED White
River Solar 2, LLC, CED Wistaria Solar, LLC, Consolidated Edison
Energy, Inc., Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc., Copper Mountain
Solar 1, LLC, Copper Mountain Solar 2, LLC, Copper Mountain Solar 3,
LLC, Copper Mountain Solar 4, LLC, Copper Mountain Solar 5, LLC, Great
Valley Solar 1, LLC, Great Valley Solar 2, LLC, Great Valley Solar 3,
LLC, Mesquite Solar 1, LLC, Mesquite Solar 2, LLC, Mesquite Solar 3,
LLC, Mesquite Solar 4, LLC, Mesquite Solar 5, LLC, Panoche Valley
Solar, LLC, Pleasant Hill Solar, LLC, SEP II, LLC, Water Strider Solar
LLC, Watlington Solar, LLC.
    Description: Joint Application for Authorization Under Section 203
of the Federal Power Act of RWE Aktiengesellschaft.
    Filed Date: 10/28/22.
    Accession Number: 20221028-5314.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/18/22.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1520-010; ER10-1521-010; ER10-2474-029; ER10-
2475-030; ER10-3246-023; ER13-1266-043; ER13-1266-044; ER15-2211-041;
ER20-2493-005; ER22-1385-004.
    Applicants: Occidental Power Services, Inc., Occidental Power
Marketing, L.P., Sierra Pacific Power Company, Nevada Power Company,
PacifiCorp, CalEnergy, LLC, MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC, OTCF,
LLC, BHER Market Operations, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Occidental Power
Services, Inc.
    Filed Date: 10/31/22.
    Accession Number: 20221031-5401.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1841-027; ER10-1849-028; ER10-1851-016; ER10-
2005-027; ER11-26-027; ER13-712-030; ER13-752-017; ER13-1991-024; ER13-
1992-024; ER15-1418-017; ER15-1883-017; ER15-1925-022; ER15-2582-012;
ER15-2676-021; ER16-91-016; ER16-632-016; ER16-1672-019; ER16-2190-018;
ER16-2191-018; ER16-2453-019; ER17-804-003; ER17-2152-015; ER18-882-
014; ER18-1534-010; ER18-1863-012; ER18-1978-010; ER18-2118-014; ER19-
987-014; ER19-1003-014; ER19-1073-008; ER19-1393-014; ER19-1394-014;
ER19-2269-007; ER19-2373-010; ER19-2437-010; ER19-2461-010; ER19-2901-
008; ER20-122-008; ER20-819-010; ER20-820-009; ER20-1769-008; ER20-
1980-006; ER20-1986-005; ER20-1987-009; ER20-2049-005; ER20-2179-007;
ER21-1320-004; ER21-1519-004; ER21-1682-004; ER21-1879-004; ER21-1990-
004; ER21-2118-006; ER21-2293-006; ER21-2294-005; ER21-2296-005; ER21-
2304-005; ER21-2674-005; ER22-381-005; ER22-415-005; ER22-2634-001;
ER22-2706-001.
    Applicants: Eight Point Wind, LLC, Buffalo Ridge Wind, LLC,
Arlington Energy Center III, LLC, Dunns Bridge Solar Center, LLC,
Borderlands Wind, LLC, Arlington Solar, LLC, Ensign Wind Energy, LLC,
Arlington Energy Center II, LLC, Fish Springs Ranch Solar, LLC, Dodge
Flat Solar, LLC, Blackwell Wind Energy, LLC, Farmington Solar, LLC,
Elora Solar, LLC, Cool Springs Solar, LLC, Crystal Lake Wind Energy
III, LLC, Baldwin Wind Energy, LLC, Cedar Springs Wind III, LLC, Cerro
Gordo Wind, LLC, Day County Wind I, LLC, Cedar Springs Wind, LLC,
Chicot Solar, LLC, Blythe Solar IV, LLC, Blythe Solar III, LLC, Crowned
Ridge Interconnection, LLC, Bronco Plains Wind, LLC, Crowned Ridge
Wind, LLC, Emmons-Logan Wind, LLC, Ashtabula Wind I, LLC, Dougherty
County Solar, LLC, Endeavor Wind II, LLC, Endeavor Wind I, LLC, Alta
Wind VIII, LLC, Crystal Lake Wind Energy II, LLC, Crystal Lake Wind
Energy I, LLC, Armadillo Flats Wind Project, LLC, Casa Mesa Wind, LLC,
Coolidge Solar I, LLC, East Hampton Energy Storage Center, LLC, Elk
City Renewables II, LLC, Cottonwood Wind Project, LLC, Coram California
Development, L.P., Brady Interconnection, LLC, Brady Wind II, LLC,
Brady Wind, LLC, Chaves County Solar, LLC, Blythe Solar II, LLC, Blythe
Solar 110, LLC, Cedar Bluff Wind, LLC, Carousel Wind Farm, LLC,
Breckinridge Wind Project, LLC, Adelanto Solar, LLC, Adelanto Solar II,
LLC, Desert Sunlight 300, LLC, Desert Sunlight 250, LLC, Energy Storage
Holdings, LLC, Cimarron Wind Energy, LLC, Ashtabula Wind III, LLC,
Ashtabula Wind II, LLC, ESI Vansycle Partners, L.P., Elk City Wind,
LLC, Butler Ridge Wind Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Adelanto Solar II, LLC,
Part 1 of 4 et al.
    Filed Date: 10/31/22.
    Accession Number: 20221031-5395.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1852-070; ER10-1857-019; ER10-1890-023; ER10-
1899-018; ER10-1907-026; ER10-1918-027; ER10-1930-016; ER10-1931-017;
ER10-1932-019; ER10-1935-020; ER10-1950-027; ER10-1962-023; ER10-1966-
018; ER11-2160-023; ER11-2642-022; ER11-3635-019; ER12-895-027; ER12-
1228-029; ER12-2225-017; ER12-2226-017; ER13-2112-018; ER13-2147-006;
ER14-1630-014; ER14-2138-014; ER14-2447-001; ER14-2707-024; ER15-1375-
017; ER15-2101-013; ER15-2477-016; ER15-2601-010; ER16-90-016; ER16-
1354-013; ER16-1872-017; ER16-2275-017; ER16-2276-017; ER17-2340-013;
ER18-1771-016; ER18-1952-013; ER18-2003-013; ER18-2066-008; ER18-2182-
014; ER18-2246-016; ER19-1392-009; ER19-2389-008; ER19-2398-012; ER20-
1907-006; ER20-2019-006; ER20-2064-007; ER20-2690-008; ER20-2695-008;
ER21-254-006; ER21-1953-006; ER21-2117-005; ER21-2149-005; ER21-2225-
005; ER21-2699-006; ER22-1454-001; ER22-1982-001; ER22-2536-001; ER22-
2552-001.
    Applicants: Java Solar, LLC, Kossuth County Wind, LLC, Great
Prairie Wind, LLC, LI Solar Generation, LLC, Minco Wind Energy III,
LLC, Irish Creek Wind, LLC, Minco Wind Energy II, LLC, Little Blue Wind
Project, LLC, Heartland Divide Wind II, LLC, Harmony Florida Solar,
LLC, Mohave County Wind Farm LLC, Jordan Creek Wind Farm LLC, High
Majestic Wind I, LLC, Gray County Wind, LLC, Minco Wind I, LLC, Hancock
County Wind, LLC, Grazing Yak Solar, LLC, High Lonesome Mesa Wind, LLC,
Heartland Divide Wind Project, LLC, Minco IV & V Interconnection, LLC,
Minco Wind IV, LLC, Lorenzo Wind, LLC, Gulf Power Company, Langdon
Renewables, LLC, Golden Hills North Wind, LLC, Kingman Wind Energy II,
LLC, Kingman Wind Energy I, LLC, Marshall Solar, LLC, Live Oak Solar,
LLC, Golden Hills Interconnection, LLC, Green Mountain Storage, LLC,
Golden Hills Wind, LLC, Golden West Power Partners, LLC, McCoy Solar,
LLC, Mammoth Plains Wind Project, LLC, Granite Reliable Power, LLC,
Limon Wind III, LLC, Mantua Creek Solar, LLC, Frontier Utilities New
York LLC, Genesis Solar, LLC, Limon Wind, LLC, Limon Wind II, LLC, High
Majestic Wind II, LLC, Minco Wind Interconnection Services, LLC, Hatch
Solar Energy Center I, LLC, FPL Energy South Dakota Wind, LLC, FPL
Energy Montezuma Wind, LLC, Logan Wind Energy LLC, High Winds, LLC,
Garden Wind, LLC, FPL Energy Wyman IV, LLC, FPL Energy Wyman, LLC, FPL
Energy Vansycle, L.L.C., FPL Energy Stateline II, Inc., FPL Energy
North Dakota Wind II, LLC, FPL Energy North Dakota Wind, LLC, FPL
Energy Illinois Wind, LLC, FPL Energy Green Power Wind, LLC, FPL Energy
Cape, LLC, Florida Power & Light Company.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Florida Power & Light
Company, Part 2 of 4 et al.
    Filed Date: 10/31/22.
    Accession Number: 20221031-5396.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1910-026; ER10-1911-026.
    Applicants: Duquesne Power, LLC, Duquesne Light Company.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Duquesne Light Company,
et al.
    Filed Date: 10/31/22.
    Accession Number: 20221031-5402.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/22.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but

intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 2, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-24334 Filed 11-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P