[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 31, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48692-48693]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18762]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0557; FRL-8884-01-OAR]

Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request; Part 70
State Operating Permit Program (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is planning to submit an
information collection request (ICR), ``Part 70 State Operating Permit
Program (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No. 1587.15, OMB Control No. 2060-0243) to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). Before doing so, the
EPA is soliciting public comments on specific aspects of the proposed
information collection. This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which
is currently approved through April 30, 2022. An Agency may not conduct
or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 1, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2021-0557, online using https://www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket
Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460.
    The EPA is temporarily suspending its Docket Center and Reading
Room for

public visitors, with limited exceptions, to reduce the risk of
transmitting COVID-19. Our Docket Center staff will continue to provide
remote customer service via email, phone, and webform. The EPA
encourages the public to submit comments via https://www.regulations.gov/ as there may be a delay in processing mail and
faxes. Hand deliveries or couriers will be received by scheduled
appointment only. For further information and updates on EPA Docket
Center services, please visit us online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    The EPA continues to carefully and continuously monitor information
from the Center of Disease Control, local area health departments, and
our federal partners so that the Agency can respond rapidly as
conditions change regarding COVID-19.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Corey Sugerik, Air Quality Policy
Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, C504-05,
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. The EPA's policy is
that all comments received will be included in the public docket
without change including any personal information provided, unless the
comment includes profanity, threats, information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. The
EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval. At that time, the EPA will issue another Federal
Register notice to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. Abstract: Title V of
the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) requires states to develop and implement
a program for issuing operating permits to all sources that fall under
any Act definition of ``major'' and certain other non-major sources
that are subject to federal air quality regulations. The Act further
requires the EPA to develop regulations that establish the minimum
requirements for those state operating permits programs and to oversee
implementation of the state programs. The EPA regulations setting forth
requirements for the state operating permit program are found at 40 CFR
part 70. The part 70 program is designed to be implemented primarily by
state, local and tribal permitting authorities in all areas where they
have jurisdiction.
    In order to receive an operating permit for a major or other source
subject to the permitting program, the applicant must conduct the
necessary research, perform the appropriate analyses and prepare the
permit application with documentation to demonstrate that its facility
meets all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. Specific
activities and requirements are listed and described in the Supporting
Statement for the 40 CFR part 70 ICR.
    Under 40 CFR part 70, state, local and tribal permitting
authorities review permit applications, provide for public review of
proposed permits, issue permits based on consideration of all technical
factors and public input and review information submittals required of
sources during the term of the permit. Also, under 40 CFR part 70, the
EPA reviews certain actions of the permitting authorities and provides
oversight of the programs to ensure that they are being adequately
implemented and enforced. Consequently, information prepared and
submitted by sources is essential for sources to receive permits, and
for federal, state, local and tribal permitting authorities to
adequately review the permit applications and thereby properly
administer and manage the program.
    Information that is collected is handled according to the EPA's
policies set forth in title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B--
Confidentiality of Business Information (see 40 CFR part 2). See also
section 114(c) of the Act.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Industrial plants (sources); state,
local and tribal permitting authorities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: mandatory (see 40 CFR part 70).
    Estimated number of respondents: 14,201 sources and 117 state,
local and tribal permitting authorities.
    Frequency of response: On occasion.
    Total estimated burden: 4,756,110 hours (per year). Burden is
defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $325,175,507 (per year). There are no
annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is an increase of 17,185 hours in the
total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently
approved by OMB. This increase is due to updated estimates of the
number of sources and permits subject to the part 70 program, rather
than any change in federal mandates.

    Dated: August 26, 2021.
Scott Mathias,
Director, Air Quality Policy Division, OAQPS.
[FR Doc. 2021-18762 Filed 8-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12105-12106]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4710]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

56th Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 186, Automatic Dependent
Surveillance--Broadcast (ADS-B)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 186, Automatic Dependent
Surveillance--Broadcast (ADS-B).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the
56th meeting of RTCA Special Committee 186, Automatic Dependent
Surveillance--Broadcast (ADS-B)

DATES: The meeting will be held March 20, 2012, from 8:30 a.m.-4:30
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street,
MacIntosh--NBAA Room and Colson Board Room, NW., Suite 910, Washington,
DC 20036

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 186. The agenda will
include the following:

March 20, 2012

Joint Session with EUROCAE Working Group 51

 Chairman's Introductory Remarks
 Review of Meeting Agenda
 Review/Approval of the Fifty-Fifth Meeting Summary, RTCA Paper
No. 256-11/SC186-319
 FAA Surveillance and Broadcast Services (SBS) Program--Status
 Working Group Reports
     Traffic Situation Awareness with Alerts (TSAA)--Status
     TSAA Functionality with respect to Existing Traffic Safety
Nets
     EUORCAE WG51 TSAA Perpective
     Flight-deck Interval Management (FIM)--Status.

     WG-1--Operations and Implementation--no report
     WG-2--TIS-B MASPS--no report
     WG-3--1090 MHz MOPS--no report
     Corrigendum-1 for DO-260B/ED-102A approved by PMC, Dec.
13, 2011
     WG-4--Application Technical Requirements--Status
     WG-5--UAT MOPS--no report
     Corrigendum-1 for DO-282B approved by PMC, Dec. 13, 2011
     WG-6--Combined ADS-B & ASA MASPS--(See agenda item
7.)
 Date, Place and Time of Next Meeting

SC186 Only Agenda Items

 Document Approval: DO-xxx--Minimum Aviation System Performance
Standards (MASPS) for ADS-B Traffic Surveillance Systems and
Application (ATSSA)
 New Business
 Other Business
 Review Action Items/Work Programs
 Adjourn Plenary
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 23, 2012.
John Raper,
Manager, Business Operations Branch, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-4710 Filed 2-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: January 6, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 4)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 1377-1385]
[DOCID:fr06ja06-7]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part IV

Environmental Protection Agency

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

40 CFR Part 63

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Surface
Coating of Metal Cans; Final Rule and Proposed Rule

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[OAR-2003-0005; FRL-8018-9]
RIN 2060-AM28

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Surface
Coating of Metal Cans

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule; amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action on amendments to the
national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for
surface coating of metal cans, which were promulgated on November 13,
2003, under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The direct final
rule amendments correct errors and add clarification to sections of the
rule. We are issuing the amendments as a direct final rule, without
prior proposal, because we view the revisions as noncontroversial and
anticipate no adverse comments. However, in the Proposed Rules section
of this Federal Register notice, we are publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to amend the NESHAP for surface coating
of metal cans if adverse comments are filed. Any comments on the
revisions should be directed to the proposed rule.

DATES: The direct final rule is effective on March 7, 2006 without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by February
6, 2006. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register indicating which amendments will
become effective and which amendments are being withdrawn due to
adverse comment.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. OAR-2003-
0005, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Agency Web site: http://docket.epa.gov/edkpub/index.jsp.

EDOCKET, EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA's
preferred method for receiving comments. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER> and<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Postal Service, send comments to: EPA Docket
Center (6102T), Attention Docket ID No. OAR-2003-0005, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. Please include a total
of two copies. We request that you also send a separate copy of each
comment to the contact person listed below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
     Hand Delivery: In person or by courier, deliver comments
to: EPA Docket Center (6102T), Attention Docket ID No. OAR-2003-0005,
1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room B-108, Washington, DC 20004. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information. Please include a total of two copies. We request
that you also send a separate copy of each comment to the contact
person listed below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. OAR-2003-0005.
The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change and may be made available online at http://docket.epa.gov/edkpub/index.jsp
, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through EDOCKET,
regulations.gov, or e-mail. Send or deliver information identified as
CBI only to the following address: Mr. Roberto Morales, OAQPS Document
Control Officer, EPA (C404-02), Attention Docket ID No. OAR-2003-0005,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. Clearly mark all of the information
that you claim to be CBI. The EPA EDOCKET and the Federal
regulations.gov websites are ``anonymous access'' systems, which means
EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to EPA without going through EDOCKET or regulations.gov, your
e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit EDOCKET on-line or see the
Federal Register of May 31, 2002 (67 FR 38102).
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the EDOCKET index
at http://docket.epa.gov/edkpub/index.jsp. Although listed in the

index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either electronically in
EDOCKET or in hardcopy at the EPA Docket Center, Docket ID No. OAR-
2003-0005, EPA West Building, Room B-102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone
number for the EPA Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. A reasonable fee
may be charged for copying docket materials.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact Mr.
Paul Almodovar, EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards,
Emission Standards Division, Coatings and Consumer Products Group
(C539-03), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number (919)
541-0283; fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulated Entities. Categories and entities
potentially regulated by this action include:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Examples of regulated
          Category               NAICS * code            entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry....................             332431  Two piece beverage can
                                                  facilities.
                                332431, 332115,  Three piece food can
                                332116, 332812,   facilities, two piece
                                         332999   D&I facilities, one
                                                  piece aerosol can
                                                  facilities, etc.
                                         332431  Can assembly
                                                  facilities.

                                 332431, 332812  End manufacturing
                                                  facilities.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* North American Industry Classification System

    This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this
action. To determine whether your facility is regulated by this action,
you should examine the applicability criteria in 40 CFR 63.3481 and 40
CFR 63.3482 of the Metal Can NESHAP (68 FR 64432, November 13, 2003).
If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to
a particular entity, consult the person listed in the preceding FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    Comments. We are publishing the direct final rule amendments
without prior proposal because we view the amendments as
noncontroversial and do not anticipate adverse comments. However, in
the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are publishing
a separate document that will serve as the proposal to amend the NESHAP
for surface coating of metal cans if adverse comments are filed. If we
receive any adverse comments on one or more distinct amendments, we
will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the
public which amendments will become effective, and which amendments are
being withdrawn due to adverse comment. We will address all public
comments in a subsequent final rule, should the Agency determine to
issue one. Any of the distinct amendments in today's direct final rule
for which we do not receive adverse comment will become effective on
the previously mentioned date. We will not institute a second comment
period on the direct final rule amendments. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so at this time.
    Judicial Review. Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, judicial
review of the direct final rule amendments is available only by filing
a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit by March 7, 2006. Under section
307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA, only an objection to the direct final rule
amendments which was raised with reasonable specificity during the
period for public comment can be raised during judicial review.
Moreover, under section 307(b)(2) of the CAA, the requirements
established by the direct final rule amendments may not be challenged
separately in any civil or criminal proceedings brought by EPA to
enforce these requirements.
    Worldwide Web (WWW). In addition to being available in the docket,
an electronic copy of today's direct final rule amendments will also be
available on the WWW through the Technology Transfer Network (TTN).
Following the Administrator's signature, a copy of this action will be
posted on the TTN's policy and guidance page for newly proposed or
promulgated rules at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/. The TTN provides

information and technology exchange in various areas of air pollution
control.
    Outline. The information presented in this preamble is organized as
follows:

I. Background
II. Amendments to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KKKK
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
    A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
    B. Paperwork Reduction Act
    C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
    E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
    F. Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
    G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
    H. Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
    I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
    J. Congressional Review Act

I. Background

    EPA promulgated NESHAP for surface coating of metal cans on
November 13, 2003 (68 FR 64432). The final rule (40 CFR part 63,
subpart KKKK) includes standards for hazardous air pollutants (HAP), as
well as monitoring, performance testing, recordkeeping, and reporting
requirements related to the standards. After promulgation of the final
rule, EPA received numerous questions relating to rule interpretation.
The questions pointed out minor inconsistencies in some of the rule
language and equations and identified areas where the rule requirements
were not clear. Today's action includes direct final rule amendments
that resolve inconsistencies and clarify rule language. None of the
amendments will have any discernable effect on the stringency of the
rule.

II. Amendments to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KKKK

    In response to the proposed rule (68 FR 2110, January 15, 2003),
EPA received a question related to compliance with parametric
monitoring after testing but before the compliance date. In the final
rule, EPA retained language from the proposed rule that requires
affected sources to meet operating limits once the performance test
used to establish those limits is complete, even if this occurs before
the actual compliance date. EPA failed to make an intended change for
the final rule to clarify that existing affected sources do not have to
meet the operating limits prior to the compliance date. We have
rewritten 40 CFR 63.3492 to state that new and reconstructed sources
must meet the operating limits at all times after they have been
established during the performance test, and existing sources must meet
the operating limits at all times after the compliance date of November
13, 2006.
    A question was raised concerning the definition of major source in
the final rule versus the definition of major source in the General
Provisions of 40 CFR part 63. To be consistent with the definition of
major source in 40 CFR 63.2 of the General Provisions, we added the
phrase ``considering controls'' to the description of a major source of
HAP emissions in 40 CFR 63.3481(b).
    A question was raised about the omission of clarifying text stating
that all required calculations and compliance demonstrations may be
performed with either metric or English units. In response, we have
added language clarifying that all required calculations and all
compliance demonstrations may be performed using either metric or
English units in 40 CFR 63.3521, 63.3531, and 63.3541, as was intended.
    A question was raised about the inclusion of cleaning materials in
compliance calculations and equations. EPA erroneously made a change
between the proposed and final rule that added cleaning materials as
HAP-containing materials and included them in compliance calculations
in 40 CFR 63.3541(h). Several other surface coating maximum achievable
control technology (MACT) rules include cleaning materials as part of
the calculation of total mass of organic HAP; however, as stated in the
preamble

to the proposed rule (January 15, 2003, 68 FR 2130), emissions data
collected for the metal can industry did not show any significant HAP
associated with cleaning materials. Therefore, we have removed
references to cleaning materials in the text in 40 CFR 63.3522 and
63.3561, as well as references to cleaning materials in equations which
also resulted in modifications to the associated equation numbering in
40 CFR 63.3510, 63.3511, and 63.3512. The term ``surface preparation''
was removed in 40 CFR 63.3544(b), since this term is defined to mean
the use of a cleaning material on a substrate. These revisions are
discussed in more detail below.
    Section 63.3522, paragraph (c) pertaining to identifying those
coating operations for which affected sources use the compliant
material option in the semiannual compliance report, was revised to
exclude the application of cleaning materials as a coating operation.
    Section 63.3561 includes the definition of terms used in this
subpart, including the definition of ``capture system'' which is
defined in terms of coatings and cleaning materials. Capture systems
will not be required to collect emissions from cleaning materials, so
the definition of ``capture system'' no longer contains a reference to
cleaning materials.
    Section 63.3510, paragraph (c)(8)(ii), pertaining to the
notification of compliance requirements for affected sources using the
emission rate without add-on controls option, was revised to reference
Equations 1, 1A, 1B, 2, and 3 of 40 CFR 63.3531 for calculating the
total mass of organic HAP emissions for each month, the total volume of
coating solids used each month, and the 12-month organic HAP emission
rate, respectively.
    Section 63.3510, paragraph (c)(8)(iii) pertains to affected sources
using the emission rate with add-on controls option. The notification
of compliance will now require the use of Equations 1, 1A, and 1B of 40
CFR 63.3531 to calculate the total mass of organic HAP emissions for
the coatings and thinners used each month. Also, the calculation of the
mass of organic HAP emission reduction each month by emission capture
systems and add-on control devices will now be performed by using
Equations 1 and 1A through 1C of 40 CFR 63.3541, and Equations 2, 3,
3A, and 3B of 40 CFR 63.3541, as applicable.
    In 40 CFR 63.3511, which pertains to reporting requirements for
affected sources, references to equations to be used to calculate the
total mass of organic HAP emissions for the coatings and thinners used
each month were revised in the second sentence of paragraph (a)(6)(ii)
to include Equations 1, 1A, 1B, 2, and 3 in 40 CFR 63.3531; and in the
second sentence of paragraph (a)(7)(ii) to include Equations 1, 1A, and
1B of 40 CFR 63.3531. In addition, the calculation for the mass of
organic HAP emission reduction each month by emission capture systems
and add-on control devices will now use Equations 1 and 1A through 1C
of 40 CFR 63.3541, and Equations 2, 3, 3A, and 3B of 40 CFR 63.3541, as
applicable.
    Section 63.3512 contains recordkeeping requirements. References to
each equation were revised in paragraph (c)(3) to include Equations 1,
1A, 1B, and 2 of 40 CFR 63.3531 to be used to calculate the total mass
of organic HAP emissions for the coatings and thinners used each month
for the emission rate without add-on controls option; paragraph
(c)(4)(i) was revised to include Equations 1, 1A, and 1B of 40 CFR
63.3531 to be used to calculate the total mass of organic HAP emissions
for the coatings and thinners used each month; and paragraph
(c)(4)(iii) was revised to include Equations 1 and 1A through 1C, 2, 3,
3A, and 3B of 40 CFR 63.3541 to be used to calculate the mass of
organic HAP emission reduction by emission capture systems and add-on
control devices.
    Section 63.3544, paragraph (b), pertains to measuring capture
efficiency during a production run of at least 3 hours and up to 8
hours, where the production run is defined as the time required for a
single part to go from the beginning to the end of production. The term
production run was redefined to exclude surface preparation activities
which involve the use of cleaning materials.
    EPA received comments requesting that it include six additional
cross-references to the overall subcategory emission limit (OSEL) in
the notification, reports, and records sections of this subpart, in 40
CFR 63.3510, 63.3511, and 63.3512, respectively. The OSEL is a 12-month
alternative emission limit that can be used if the affected source
applies coatings in more than one coating type segment within a
subcategory and can be calculated by using Equation 4 in 40 CFR
63.3531(i). We have rewritten five sentences to reference OSEL Equation
4 in addition to the existing formula references and added one new
sentence. The same five sentences were also affected by the deletion of
the reference to cleaning materials, as discussed above.
    A comment was made pertaining to remaining references to 40 CFR
63.3547(g) and 63.3557(g), paragraphs pertaining to requirements for
continuous parameter monitoring for emission rate with the add-on
controls option and for the control efficiency/outlet concentration
option, respectively, that appeared in the proposed rule but were not
included in the final rule. We are removing the remaining references to
these paragraphs in 40 CFR 63.3547(a) and 63.3557(a). A similar
reference to 40 CFR 63.3546(g) remained in Table 4 to Subpart KKKK of
Part 63, Item 8.a.i, was also removed.
    A comment was made pertaining to redundant language in 40 CFR
63.3547(a)(1) and 63.3557(a)(1), pertaining to continuous parameter
monitoring system (CPMS) frequency of data collection. These sections
state that the CPMS must complete a minimum of one cycle of operation
for each successive 15-minute period. They then state that you must
have a minimum of four equally spaced successive cycles of CPMS
operation in 1 hour. The second sentence is redundant and is now
removed from each section.
    A comment was made pertaining to the need to clarify the frequency
of data collection for CPMS for permanent total enclosure (PTE) capture
systems in Table 4 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63, Item 7, and the number
of data points needed to establish the 3-hour average for the non-PTE
emission capture operating parameters in Table 4, Item 8. For emission
capture systems and add-on control devices, the frequency of data
collection and the number of data collection points is specified in 40
CFR 63.3547(a)(1) and (2) and 40 CFR 63.3557(a)(1) and (2), which state
that the CPMS must complete a minimum of one cycle of operation for
each successive 15-minute period, and the average of all recorded
readings must be determined for each successive 3-hour period. These
sections apply to emission capture systems (PTE and non-PTE) and add-on
control devices. We are, therefore, transferring this language and
references to 40 CFR 63.3547(a)(1) and (2) and 40 CFR 63.3557 (a)(1)
and (2) to Table 4 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63, Items 7 and 8, for
clarification.
    A question was raised as to whether a bypass line valve indicator
or a damper indicator would be acceptable in place of the capture
system bypass line flow indicator required in paragraph (b)(1) of 40
CFR 63.3547. The alternate indicators would meet the CPMS requirements
by recording the position of the bypass valve damper at least once
every 15 minutes to ensure

the bypass line is in the closed position and would not divert
emissions away from the add-on control device directly to the
atmosphere. We are, therefore, modifying the text to add the two
alternate indicators.
    A question was raised as to whether static pressure could be
measured at the oxidizer inlet as an alternative to the requirement to
measure the static pressure in each capture system duct as required by
Table 4 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63, Item 8, to show that the capture
system is working. EPA agrees that this approach would be acceptable,
but consider it critical to address the position of the pressure
measurement relative to the flow inducer and that ``at the inlet of the
oxidizer'' is not descriptive enough. We, therefore, added new language
requiring measurement of static pressure ``upstream of the fan'' in the
duct of each capture device or ``upstream of the fan that is common to
multiple capture devices'' versus ``at the inlet of the oxidizer.''
Language was also added to differentiate between smaller safety fans
(on the outlet of ovens that also act as capture devices) and fans that
serve as the primary air movers. This allows for the affected source to
monitor pressure downstream of the safety fan, but upstream of the
primary fan. Language was also added to refer back to the required
performance testing in 40 CFR 63.3546(g) in order to establish the
limits for gas volumetric flow rate and duct static pressure.
Conforming changes were then made to 40 CFR 63.3546(g).

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), EPA
must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' and,
therefore, subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) and the requirements of the Executive Order. The Executive Order
defines ``significant regulatory action'' as one that is likely to
result in a rule that may:
    (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities;
    (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
    (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or
    (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
the Executive Order.
    It has been determined that this rule is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under the terms of Executive Order 12866 and is,
therefore, not subject to OMB review.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This action does not impose any new information collection burden
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et
seq. OMB approved the information collection request (ICR) for the
NESHAP for metal can surface coating pursuant to the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act and has assigned OMB control number 2060-0541
(EPA ICR No. 2079.02). A copy of the original ICR may be obtained from
Susan Auby by mail at the Office of Environmental Information,
Collection Strategies Division (2822), EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20460, by e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by
calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. You may also download a copy from the internet
at http://www.epa.gov/icr. Include the ICR number in any

correspondence.
    Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    EPA has determined that it is not necessary to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis in connection with the direct final rule
amendments.
    For purposes of assessing the impacts of today's direct final rule
on small entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business as
defined by the Small Business Administrations' regulations at 13 CFR
121.201; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of
a city, county, town, school district or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is
any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated
and is not dominant in its field.
    After considering the economic impacts of today's direct final rule
amendments on small entities, EPA has concluded that this action will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. We have determined that the direct final rule amendments will
not impose any new requirements on small entities.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law No. 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess
the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, EPA
generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that
may result in expenditures to State, local, and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any
1 year. Before promulgating a rule for which a written statement is
needed, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires us to identify and
consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt the
least costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative that
achieves the objectives of the rule. The provisions of section 205 do
not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law. Moreover,
section 205 allows us to adopt an alternative other than the least
costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative if the
Administrator publishes with the final rule an explanation why that
alternative was not adopted. Before EPA establishes any regulatory
requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, including tribal governments, it must have developed under
section 203 of the UMRA a small government agency plan. The plan must
provide for notifying potentially affected small governments, enabling
officials of affected small governments

to have meaningful and timely input in the development of EPA
regulatory proposals with significant Federal intergovernmental
mandates, and informing, educating, and advising small governments on
compliance with the regulatory requirements.
    EPA has determined that the direct final rule amendments do not
contain a Federal mandate that may result in expenditures of $100
million or more for State, local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or the private sector in any 1 year. The direct final rule
amendments apply only to affected sources in the metal can industry and
clarify and correct errors in the final rule and, therefore, add no
additional burden on sources. EPA has determined that this rule
contains no regulatory requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. The direct final rule amendments
apply only to affected sources in the metal can industry and clarify
and correct errors in the final rule. Thus, the direct final rule
amendments are not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205
of the UMRA.

E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism

    Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
    The direct final rule amendments do not have federalism
implications. They will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132. No
metal can production facilities subject to the direct final rule
amendments are owned or operated by State or local governments.
Therefore, State and local governments will not have any direct
compliance costs resulting from the direct final rule amendments.
Furthermore, the direct final rule amendments do not require these
governments, or anyone else, to take on any new responsibilities. Thus,
Executive Order 13132 does not apply to the direct final rule
amendments.

F. Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' The direct final rule
amendments do not have tribal implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. They will not have substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship between the Federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal government and Indian tribes, because we are not
aware of any Indian tribal governments or communities affected by the
direct final rule amendments. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to the direct final rule amendments.

G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) applies to any
rule that: (1) Is determined to be ``economically significant'' as
defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental
health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a
disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action meets
both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health or
safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the
planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and
reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.
    EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that are based on health or safety risks, such that
the analysis required under section 5-501 of the Executive Order has
the potential to influence the regulation. The direct final rule
amendments are not subject to Executive Order 13045 because they are
based on technology performance and not on health or safety risks.

H. Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    The direct final rule amendments are not subject to Executive Order
13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because they are not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) of 1995, Public Law No. 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS) in its
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. The VCS are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by
VCS bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA to provide Congress, through the OMB,
explanations when the Agency decides not to use available and
applicable VCS.
    The direct final rule amendments do not involve technical
standards; therefore, EPA is not adopting any VCS.

J. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing the
direct final rule amendments and other required information to the
United States Senate, the United States House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the direct final rule amendments in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. The direct final rule amendments are not a ``major rule'' as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The direct final rule amendments are
effective on March 7, 2006.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, and Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 29, 2005.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.

0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, part 63 of
the Code of the Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 63--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

Subpart KKKK--[AMENDED]

0
2. Section 63.3481 is amended by revising the second sentence in
paragraph (b) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3481  Am I subject to this subpart?

* * * * *
    (b) * * * A major source of HAP emissions is any stationary source
or group of stationary sources located within a contiguous area and
under common control that emits or has the potential to emit,
considering controls, any single HAP at a rate of 9.07 megagrams (Mg)
(10 tons) or more per year or any combination of HAP at a rate of 22.68
Mg (25 tons) or more per year.
* * * * *

0
3. Section 63.3492 is amended by revising the third sentence in
paragraph (b) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3492  What operating limits must I meet?

* * * * *
    (b) * * * You must establish the operating limits during the
initial performance test according to the requirements in Sec.  63.3546
or Sec.  63.3556. New and reconstructed sources must meet the operating
limits at all times after they have been established during the
performance test, and existing sources must meet the operating limits
at all times after the compliance date.
* * * * *

0
4. Section 63.3510 is amended by revising paragraphs (c)(8)(ii) and
(iii) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3510  What notifications must I submit?

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (8) * * *
    (ii) For the emission rate without add-on controls option, provide
the calculation of the total mass of organic HAP emissions for each
month, the calculation of the total volume of coating solids used each
month, and the calculation of the 12-month organic HAP emission rate,
using Equations 1, 1A, 1B, 2, and 3, respectively, of Sec.  63.3531, or
Equation 4 of Sec.  63.3531, if applicable.
    (iii) For the emission rate with add-on controls option, provide
the calculation of the total mass of organic HAP emissions for the
coatings and thinners used each month, using Equations 1, 1A, and 1B of
Sec.  63.3531; the calculation of the total volume of coating solids
used each month, using Equation 2 of Sec.  63.3531; the calculation of
the mass of organic HAP emission reduction each month by emission
capture systems and add-on control devices, using Equations 1 and 1A
through 1C of Sec.  63.3541, and Equations 2, 3, 3A, and 3B of Sec.
63.3541, as applicable; the calculation of the total mass of organic
HAP emissions each month, using Equation 4 of Sec.  63.3541, as
applicable; and the calculation of the 12-month organic HAP emission
rate, using the applicable equation, Equation 5 of Sec.  63.3541 or
Equation 4 of Sec.  63.3531.
* * * * *
0
5. Section 63.3511 is amended by revising the second sentence of
paragraph (a)(6)(ii) and the second sentence of paragraph (a)(7)(ii) to
read as follows:

Sec.  63.3511  What reports must I submit?

    (a) * * *
    (6) * * *
    (ii) * * * You must provide the calculations for Equations 1, 1A,
1B, 2, and 3 in Sec.  63.3531 or Equation 4 in Sec.  63.3531, if
applicable; and, if applicable, the calculation used to determine mass
of organic HAP in waste materials according to Sec.  63.3531(e)(3). * *
*
* * * * *
    (7) * * *
    (ii) * * * You must provide the calculation of the total mass of
organic HAP emissions for the coatings and thinners used each month,
using Equations 1, 1A, and 1B of Sec.  63.3531 and, if applicable, the
calculation used to determine mass of organic HAP in waste materials
according to Sec.  63.3531(e)(3); the calculation of the total volume
of coating solids used each month, using Equation 2 of Sec.  63.3531;
the calculation of the mass of organic HAP emission reduction each
month by emission capture systems and add-on control devices, using
Equations 1 and 1A through 1C of Sec.  63.3541, and Equations 2, 3, 3A,
and 3B of Sec.  63.3541, as applicable; the calculation of the total
mass of organic HAP emissions each month, using Equation 4 of Sec.
63.3541; and the calculation of the 12-month organic HAP emission rate,
using Equation 5 of Sec.  63.3541, or Equation 4 in Sec.  63.3531, if
applicable. * * *
* * * * *

0
6. Section 63.3512 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (c)(3), (c)(4) introductory text, (c)(4)(i), and
(c)(4)(iii); and
0
b. Adding paragraph (c)(4)(vi) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3512  What records must I keep?

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (3) For the emission rate without add-on controls option, a record
of the calculation of the total mass of organic HAP emissions for the
coatings and thinners used each month, using Equations 1, 1A, 1B, and 2
of Sec.  63.3531 and, if applicable, the calculation used to determine
mass of organic HAP in waste materials according to Sec.
63.3531(e)(3); the calculation of the total volume of coating solids
used each month, using Equation 2 of Sec.  63.3531; and the calculation
of each 12-month organic HAP emission rate, using Equation 3 of Sec.
63.3531, or Equation 4 in Sec.  63.3531, if applicable.
    (4) For the emission rate with add-on controls option, records of
the calculations specified in paragraphs (c)(4)(i) through (vi) of this
section.
    (i) The calculation of the total mass of organic HAP emissions for
the coatings and thinners used each month, using Equations 1, 1A, and
1B of Sec.  63.3531 and, if applicable, the calculation used to
determine mass of organic HAP in waste materials according to Sec.
63.3531(e)(3).
* * * * *
    (iii) The calculation of the mass of organic HAP emission reduction
by emission capture systems and add-on control devices, using Equations
1 and 1A through 1C of Sec.  63.3541, and Equations 2, 3, 3A, and 3B of
Sec.  63.3541, as applicable.
* * * * *
    (vi) The OSEL calculation, if applicable, using Equation 4 of Sec.
63.3531.
* * * * *

0
7. Section 63.3521 is amended by adding a sentence to the end of the
introductory text to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3521  How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the
emission limitations?

    * * * All required calculations and compliance demonstrations may
be performed with either metric or English units.
* * * * *

0
8. Section 63.3522 is amended by revising the second sentence in
paragraph (c) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3522  How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the
emission limitations?

* * * * *
    (c) * * * If there were no deviations from the emission limitations
set forth in Sec.  63.3490, submit a statement that the coating
operation(s) was (were) in compliance with the emission limitations
during the reporting period because you used no coating for which the
organic HAP content exceeded the applicable emission limit in Sec.
63.3490, and you used no thinner that contained

organic HAP, as determined according to Sec.  63.3521(a).
* * * * *

0
9. Section 63.3531 is amended by adding a sentence to the end of the
introductory text to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3531  How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the
emission limitations?

    * * * All required calculations and compliance demonstrations may
be performed with either metric or English units.
* * * * *

0
10. Section 63.3541 is amended by:
0
a. Adding a sentence to the end of paragraph (a);
0
b. Revising the third sentence and Equation 1 (defined terms) of
paragraph (h);
0
c. Removing paragraph (h)(3) and Equation 1C and redesignating
paragraph (h)(4) as (h)(3) and Equation 1D as Equation 1C, and revising
the newly redesignated paragraph (h)(3); and
0
d. Revising paragraph (i)(5) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3541  How do I demonstrate initial compliance?

    (a) * * * All required calculations and compliance demonstrations
may be performed with either metric or English units.
* * * * *
    (h) Calculate the organic HAP emission reduction for each
controlled coating operation not using liquid-liquid material balances.
* * * The calculation applies the emission capture system efficiency
and add-on control device efficiency to the mass of organic HAP
contained in the coatings and thinners that are used in the coating
operation served by the emission capture system and add-on control
device during each month. * * *
* * * * *
Hunc = Total mass of organic HAP in the coatings and
thinners used during all deviations specified in Sec.  63.3542(c) and
(d) that occurred during the month in the controlled coating operation,
kg, as calculated in Equation 1C of this section.
* * * * *
    (3) Calculate the mass of organic HAP in the coatings and thinners
used in the controlled coating operation during deviations specified in
Sec.  63.3542(c) and (d), using Equation 1C of this section.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR06JA06.363

Where:

Hunc = Total mass of organic HAP in the coatings and
thinners used during all deviations specified in Sec.  63.3542(c) and
(d) that occurred during the month in the controlled coating operation,
kg.
Volh = Total volume of coating or thinner, h, used in the
controlled coating operation during deviations, liters.
Dh = Density of coating or thinner, h, kg per liter.
Wh = Mass fraction of organic HAP in coating or thinner, h,
kg organic HAP per kg coating.
q = Number of different coatings or thinners.

    (i) Calculate the organic HAP emission reduction for each
controlled coating operation using liquid-liquid material balances. * *
*
    (5) Measure the volume of each coating and thinner used in the
coating operation controlled by the solvent recovery system during the
month, liters.
* * * * *

0
11. Section 63.3544 is amended by revising the fifth sentence in
paragraph (b) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3544  How do I determine the emission capture system
efficiency?

* * * * *
    (b) * * * For the purposes of this test, a production run means the
time required for a single part to go from the beginning to the end of
production, and includes drying or curing time, but excludes surface
preparation activities.
* * * * *

0
12. Section 63.3546 is amended by revising paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2)
as follows:

Sec.  63.3546  How do I establish the emission capture system and add-
on control device operating limits during the performance test?

* * * * *
    (g) * * *
    (1) During the capture efficiency determination required by Sec.
63.3540 and described in Sec. Sec.  63.3543 and 63.3544, you must
monitor and record either the gas volumetric flow rate at a location
upstream of the control device, or the duct static pressure at a
location upstream of the primary fan in each duct of each capture
device or upstream of the fan that is common to multiple capture
devices at least once every 15 minutes during each of the three test
runs.
    (2) Calculate and record the average gas volumetric flow rate or
duct static pressure for the three test runs for each capture device or
system of multiple capture devices. The average gas volumetric flow
rate is the minimum operating limit for that specific capture device or
system of multiple capture devices. The average duct static pressure is
the maximum operating limit for that specific capture device or system
of multiple capture devices.
0
13. Section 63.3547 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the first sentence of paragraph (a) introductory text,
0
b. Removing the second sentence of paragraph (a)(1), and
0
c. Revising paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3547  What are the requirements for continuous parameter
monitoring system installation, operation, and maintenance?

    (a) General. You must install, operate, and maintain each CPMS
specified in paragraphs (c), (e), and (f) of this section according to
paragraphs (a) (1) through (6) of this section. * * *
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) Properly install, maintain, and operate a flow indicator that
takes a reading at least once every 15 minutes. The flow indicator
shall be installed at the entrance to any bypass line. Alternatively,
install, maintain, and operate a bypass line valve indicator or damper
indicator that indicates valve position.
* * * * *

0
14. Section 63.3557 is amended by revising the first sentence of
paragraph (a) introductory text and removing the second sentence of
paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3557  What are the requirements for continuous parameter
monitoring system installation, operation, and maintenance?

    (a) General. You must install, operate, and maintain each CPMS
specified in paragraphs (c), (e), and (f) of this section according to
paragraphs (a)(1) through (6) of this section. * * *
* * * * *

0
15. Section 63.3561 is amended by revising the definition of ``capture
system'' to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3561  What definitions apply to this subpart?

* * * * *
    Capture system means one or more capture devices intended to
collect emissions generated by a coating operation in the use of
coatings, both at the point of application and at subsequent points
where emissions from the coatings occur, such as flash-off, drying, or
curing.
* * * * *

0
16. Table 4 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63 is amended by redesignating Item

7.a.ii as 7.a.iii and adding a new Item 7.a.ii; and revising newly
redesignated Item 7.a.iii, and Items 8.a introductory text, 8.a.i,
8.a.ii, and 8.a.iii to read as follows:

Table 4 to Subpart KKKK of Part 63--Operating Limits if Using the
Emission Rate With Add-On Controls Option or the Control Efficiency/
Outlet Concentration Compliance Option

    7. * * *
    a. * * *
    i. * * *
    ii. Reducing the data collected each successive 15-minute period to
3-hour block averages according to Sec.  63.3547(a)(1) and (2) or Sec.
63.3557(a)(1) and (2), as applicable; and
    iii. Maintaining the 3-hour block average facial velocity of air
flow through all natural draft openings or the pressure drop at or
above the facial velocity limit or pressure drop limit, and maintaining
the direction of air flow into the enclosure at all times.
    8. * * *
    a. The average gas volumetric flow rate at a location upstream of
the control device, or duct static pressure at a location upstream
(i.e., vacuum side) of the primary fan in each duct of each capture
device or upstream of the fan that is common to multiple capture
devices in each 3-hour period must not fall below the average
volumetric flow rate or above the duct static pressure limit
established for that capture device in accordance with Sec.  63.3546 or
Sec.  63.3556, as applicable.
    i. Measuring the gas volumetric flow at a location upstream of the
control device, or duct static pressure at a location upstream (i.e.,
vacuum side) of the primary fan in each duct of each capture device
upstream or upstream of the fan that is common to multiple capture
devices; and
    ii. Reducing the data collected each successive 15-minute period to
3-hour block averages according to Sec.  63.3547(a)(1) and (2) or Sec.
63.3557(a)(1) and (2), as applicable; and
    iii. Maintaining the 3-hour block average gas volumetric flow rate
at a location upstream of the control device, or duct static pressure
at a location upstream (i.e., vacuum side) of the primary fan in each
duct of each capture device or upstream of the fan that is common to
multiple capture devices at or above the average gas volumetric flow
rate or below the duct static pressure limit established in accordance
with the performance test described in Sec.  63.3546(g).

[FR Doc. 06-70 Filed 1-5-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 26, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11294-11295]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05745]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2011-0275; FRL-9990-21-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Hydrochloric Acid Production
(Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), NESHAP for Hydrochloric Acid
Production (EPA ICR Number 2032.10, OMB Control Number 2060-0529), to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a proposed
extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through March 31,
2019. Public comments were previously requested, via the Federal
Register, on May 30, 2018 during a 60-day comment period. This notice
allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller
description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden
and cost to the public. An agency may neither conduct nor sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before April 25,
2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2011-0275, to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200

Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202)
564-2970; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP), for Hydrochloric Acid Production (40 CFR part 63,
subpart NNNNN) were proposed on September 18, 2001, promulgated on
April 17, 2003, and amended on April 7, 2006. These regulations apply
to existing and new hydrochloric acid (HCI) production facilities. New
facilities include those that commenced construction or reconstruction
after the date of proposal. This information is being collected to
assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart NNNNN. In general, all
NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and
periodic reports by the owners/operators of the affected facilities.
They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and
duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of
an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system
is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential
in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities
subject to NESHAP.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Hydrochloric acid production
facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart NNNNN).
    Estimated number of respondents: 19 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally and semiannually.
    Total estimated burden: 22,600 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $2,742,000 (per year), which includes $16,000
for annualized capital/startup and/or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an adjustment decrease in burden
and costs from the most recently-approved ICR. The adjustment decrease
in burden is due to more accurate estimates of existing and anticipated
new sources, which are based on EPA's recent re-evaluation of the
source category inventory as part of a proposed rulemaking and risk and
technology review for 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNNNN. We have also corrected
the previous assumption that existing respondents would record startup,
shutdown, and malfunction events 100 times per year. Based on
information received from industry in the development of the proposed
risk and technology review, this assumption has been corrected to 10
times per year. Further, as a result of the decrease in existing and
new sources, there is also an adjustment decrease in the number of
total annual responses and the capital and operating and maintenance
costs.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2019-05745 Filed 3-25-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 223 (Monday, November 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 69448]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28007]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: CP13-9-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Application to Abandon Gas Transportation with NSTAR
of Dominion Transmission, Inc.
    Filed Date: 10/25/12.
    Accession Number: 20121025-5162.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/16/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP13-266-000.
    Applicants: Big Sandy Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Big Sandy Pipeline, LLC, et al. submit Petition for
Temporary Waiver of Capacity Release Regulations and Related Tariff
Provisions and Request for Expedited Action and Shortened Comment
Period.
    Filed Date: 11/8/12.
    Accession Number: 20121108-5106.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/14/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP13-267-000.
    Applicants: Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc.
    Description: NAESB Version 2.0 Compliance Filing to be effective
12/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 11/8/12.
    Accession Number: 20121108-5113.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/12.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP05-164-019.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Equitrans, L.P. submits Annual Report on Fuel and Lost
and Unaccounted for gas volumes for the period September 2011 through
August 2012.
    Filed Date: 11/1/12.
    Accession Number: 20121101-5185.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/13/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP13-65-001.
    Applicants: Destin Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: NAESB Version 2.0 Compliance Filing 1 to be effective
12/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 11/8/12.
    Accession Number: 20121108-5121.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP13-9-001.
    Applicants: Trunkline Gas Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance with RP13-9-000 Order to be effective 12/1/
2012.
    Filed Date: 11/8/12.
    Accession Number: 20121108-5021.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/12.
    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, and service can be found at:
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other
information, call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-
8659.

    Dated: November 09, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-28007 Filed 11-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Record for the Proposed Section 316( b) Rule for Phase III Facilities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A B C D E Date Modified: 5/ 25/ 2006 By: Abt Associates Inc.

Data Sources:

Description: Calculates equivalent annual interest payment Purpose: For use in annualized interest payment and interest tax effect calculations The original version of this file contains, or is linked to a file that contains, confidential business information ( CBI), or information that could be used to reveal CBI. As a result, the values for any variables determined by EPA to be CBI, or that could be used to reveal CBI, have been replaced with dummy values. Such variables have been marked with light orange highlight. It should be noted that the dummy values have been added to illustrate how the spreadsheets work; they may not always be consistent with other data provided for the same model facility.

Any observed patterns of the dummy values is for illustration purposes only and has no significance with respect to the original values. It should also be noted that any information that uses the dummy values will not show the true results of EPA's analysis.

November 1, 2004 1 of 2 DCTM_ ARP. xls  File Info Record for the Proposed Section 316( b) Rule for Phase III Facilities Cap Outlay 1.00 Interest 7.0%

Term 10.00 Beg of Period 0.00 1 = BoP; 0 = EoP Fixed Payment 0.14 Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Prin Bal bop 1.0000 0.9276 0.8502 0.7673 0.6786 0.5838 0.4823 0.3736 0.2574 0.1331 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Payment 0.1424 0.1424 0.1424 0.1424 0.1424 0.1424 0.1424 0.1424 0.1424 0.1424 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Interest 0.0700 0.0649 0.0595 0.0537 0.0475 0.0409 0.0338 0.0262 0.0180 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Prin Pmnt 0.0724 0.0774 0.0829 0.0887 0.0949 0.1015 0.1086 0.1162 0.1244 0.1331 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Prin Bal eop 0.9276 0.8502 0.7673 0.6786 0.5838 0.4823 0.3736 0.2574 0.1331 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Present Values Payment 1.0000 Interest 0.3236 Prin Pmnt 0.6764 Annualized Values Payment 0.1424 Interest 0.0461 equivalent annual interest payment for use in annualized interest payment and interest tax effect calculations Prin Pmnt 0.0963 November 1, 2004 2 of 2 DCTM_ ARP. xls  [ Tab]


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 175 (Friday, September 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55931-55932]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23024]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3328-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]

New York; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for
the State of New York (FEMA-3328-EM), dated August 26, 2011, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: August 28, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an emergency declaration for
the State of New York is hereby amended to include the following areas
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the
event declared an emergency by the President in his declaration of
August 26, 2011.

    Columbia, Delaware, Greene, Orange, Putnam, Rockland, Schoharie,
Sullivan, Ulster, and Westchester Counties for emergency protective
measures (Category B), including direct federal assistance, under
the Public Assistance program.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance

(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation
Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-23024 Filed 9-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P