[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 24, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29945-29947]
[FR Doc No: E9-14772]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2008-1175]
RIN 1625-AA09

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Pamunkey River, West Point, VA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing the drawbridge operation
regulations of the Eltham Bridge (SR33/30), at mile 1.0, across
Pamunkey River at West Point, Virginia. This final rule will allow the
bridge to open on signal if at least four hours notice is given at all
times while still providing for the reasonable needs of navigation, due
to the anticipated infrequency of requests for vessel openings of the
drawbridge.

DATES: This rule is effective July 24, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Comments and materials received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2009-1175 and are available online by going to
www.regulations.gov, selecting the Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, inserting USCG-2009-1175 in the Docket ID
box, pressing Enter, and then clicking on the item in the Docket ID
column. This material is also available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or e-mail Sandra S. Elliott, Bridge Management Specialist, Fifth
Coast Guard District, at<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operation, telephone 202-
366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    On March 12, 2009, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled, ``Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Pamunkey River,
West Point, VA'' in the Federal Register (74 FR 10692). We received no
comments on the proposed rule. No public meeting was requested, and
none was held.

Background and Purpose

    The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is responsible for
the operation of the Eltham Bridge (SR33/30), at mile 1.0, across
Pamunkey River at West Point, VA. VDOT requested that the Coast Guard
consider a four hour advance notification for vessel openings due to
the infrequency of requests for vessel openings of the drawbridge.
    The new Eltham bascule bridge has recently been completed and is
located immediately adjacent and downstream from the former structure.
The former bridge provided 10 feet of vertical clearance over the
navigable channel. The new bridge provides an additional 45 feet of
vertical clearance over the navigable channel. The increase in vertical
clearance has eliminated the need to open on demand for all existing
commercial traffic and it is anticipated that there will be very few
requests other than for scheduled monthly maintenance openings.
    The existing operating regulation is set out in 33 CFR Sec.
117.1023, which requires the draw to open on signal, except that the
bridge need not open for commercial crabbing and fishing vessels and
recreational vessels on Mondays through Fridays, except Federal
Holidays, from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m., 12 noon to 1 p.m. and 4 p.m. to 6
p.m., at all other times, the bridge will open for these vessels only
on the hour, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays; and Public
vessels of the United States must pass at any time.
    Bridge opening data, supplied by VDOT, revealed a significant
decrease in yearly openings. In the past three years from 2005 to 2007,
the bridge opened for vessels 593, 415 and 187 times, respectively. Due
to the anticipated infrequency of requests for vessel openings of the
drawbridge, VDOT requested to change the current operating regulation
by requiring the draw of the bridge to open on signal if at least four
hours notice is given year-round.

Discussion of Comments and Changes

    The Coast Guard did not receive any comments on the NPRM.
Therefore, no changes were made to the final rule.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
    We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. This conclusion is based on
the fact that the changes have only a minimal impact on maritime
traffic transiting the bridge. Mariners can plan their trips in
accordance with the proposed scheduled bridge openings to minimize
delays.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners and operators of vessels needing to
transit the bridge who can not clear the bridge at its closed position.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the rule only adds minimal
restrictions to the movement of vessels, and mariners who plan their
transits in accordance with the proposed scheduled bridge openings can
minimize delay.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
    Under figure 2-1, paragraph 32(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Revise Sec.  117.1023 to read as follows:

Sec.  117.1023  Pamunkey River

    The draw of the Eltham Bridge (SR33/30) mile 1.0, located in West
Point, Virginia shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is
given at all times.

    Dated: June 10, 2009.
Fred M. Rosa, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, U. S. Coast Guard Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E9-14772 Filed 6-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 23, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 76874-76878]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29674]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Part 774

[Docket No. 141119982-4982-01]
RIN 0694-AG40

Clarification to Scope of Certain ``600 series'' Export Control
Classification Numbers (ECCNs)

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule revises six Export Control Classification Numbers
(ECCNs) to clarify that they do not control certain basic parts,
components, accessories and attachments because those basic parts,
components, accessories and attachments are controlled in a new ECCN
created by a rule published on July 1, 2014 to be effective on December
30, 2014. This rule also removes controls on certain monolithic
microwave integrated circuit (MMIC) power amplifiers and discrete
microwave transistors and related technology. These controls are no
longer necessary because two other rules published after July 1, 2014,
provide appropriate controls on those items. This rule also clarifies
the application of ``specially designed'' to controls published on July
1, 2014 that would apply to printed circuit boards, populated circuit
card assemblies and multichip modules to reduce the possibility of
confusion. Finally, this rule revises three of the amendatory
instructions in the final rule published on July 1, to avoid negating
changes to the Export Administration Regulations that became effective
after that date.

DATES: This rule is effective December 30, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Arvin, Regulatory Policy
Division, Office of Exporter Services, Bureau of Industry and Security,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>202-482-2440.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Affirming Scope of Antiterrorism License Requirement in ECCN 3A611.y

    As part of the Administration's Export Control Reform Initiative,
BIS has added to the Commerce Control List several ``600 series'' ECCNs
to control items of a military nature that the President has determined
no longer warrant control on the United State Munitions List. The ``600
series'' ECCNs are identified by the numeral ``6'' as their third
character. Many ``600 series'' ECCNs have a paragraph designated as
paragraph .x that imposes license requirements on unspecified parts,
components, accessories and attachments specially designed for a
specified set of items, unless those parts, components, accessories or
attachments are enumerated on the USML or specified in ECCNs listed in
that .x paragraph. Many ``600 series'' ECCNs also have a paragraph
designated as paragraph .y, which specifies items to which only the
antiterrorism (AT) reason for control applies. Items covered by the .x
paragraphs require a license for all destinations except Canada unless
a license exception is available. Items covered by .y paragraphs
require a license for only Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Syria, the
People's Republic of China, Russia, and Venezuela.
    In response to a proposed rule--Revisions to the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR): Control of Military Electronic
Equipment and Related Items the President Determines No Longer Warrant
Control Under the United States Munitions List (77 FR 70945, November
28, 2012)--one commenter expressed a belief that placing .y paragraphs
in separate ECCNs would lead to inconsistent classifications; for
example, in some ECCNs indicator lights appeared in the .y paragraph
but not in other ECCNs. In response, BIS, inter alia, published a
second proposed rule and solicited comments on three specific ideas for
organizing the controls that had been set forth in the .y paragraphs
(78 FR 45026, 45034, July 25, 2013). Those ideas were: (1) Creating
separate ECCN-specific .y paragraphs; (2) creating a single list of
``600 series'' items that would be subject only to the antiterrorism
and China license requirements; and (3) establishing a classification
request procedure whereby a ``600 series'' item could be designated as
subject only to antiterrorism and China license requirements, but
eliminate the .y listings from the regulations or remove all .y lists
completely.
    After reviewing the comments on that proposal, BIS published a
final rule (79

FR 37551, 37560, July 1, 2014) (hereinafter ``the Military Electronics
Final Rule'') in which ECCN 3A611 contained a .y paragraph that imposes
a license requirement to the eight destinations noted above (Cuba,
Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Syria, the People's Republic of China,
Russia, and Venezuela) for any of the 35 commodities listed therein,
even in instances where the commodities are specially designed for
something in a ``600 series'' ECCN other than 3A611. For example, a
grounding strap that is specially designed for an ECCN 9A610 aircraft
would be classified as ECCN 3A611.y and subject to the same license
requirements as other .y items because grounding straps are specified
in ECCN 3A611.y and are not specified in any paragraph of ECCN 9A610.
BIS explained this policy in its response to Comment 26 set forth in
the preamble of the Military Electronics Final Rule. That comment reads
as follows:

One commenter stated that its connectors that currently are
classified under USML Category XI(c) would transfer to 3A611.y.3.
The commenter noted that the problem with the 3A611.y text is that
it states that it is `for a commodity subject to control in this
entry and not elsewhere specified in any ``600 series'' ECCN.' Thus,
an electrical connector that is `specially designed' for military
aircraft equipment currently under USML Category VIII, would be
classified under ECCN 9A610.x.

    BIS' response stated:

In this final rule, ECCN 3A611.y applies to parts, components,
accessories and attachments that are `specially designed' for a
commodity subject to control in a `600 series' ECCN and not
elsewhere specified in any `600 series' ECCN, and includes in its
list of commodities electrical connectors. Thus, if the connectors
in fact are moved from the USML to the CCL and are not `specified in
another ``600 series'' ECCN,' they are controlled by ECCN 3A611.y.

See 79 FR at 37560 (emphasis added.)
    Nevertheless, since the Military Electronics Final Rule was
published, BIS has received questions and comments indicating that,
based on text in ECCN 9A610.x, some readers are confused about the
scope of ECCN 3A611.y. ECCN 9A610.x reads as follows: ```Parts,'
`components,' `accessories,' and `attachments' that are `specially
designed' for a commodity subject to control in this ECCN or a defense
article in USML Category VIII and not elsewhere specified on the USML
or in ECCN 9A610.y.'' Readers noted that the text of paragraph .x
explicitly excludes commodities specified in ECCN 9A610.y, but does not
exclude commodities specified in ECCN 3A611.y. This omission led those
readers to conclude incorrectly that, for example, a ground strap or
electrical connector is controlled in ECCN 9A610.x (and subject to
broad geographic license requirements that apply to .x paragraphs in
the ``600 series'') if the item is specially designed for an aircraft
that is controlled in ECCN 9A610 or on the USML. BIS does not construe
the broad expression ```specially designed' for . . . and not elsewhere
specified . . .'' found in ECCN 9A610.x, as specifying the parts,
components, accessories and attachments to which ECCN 9A610.x applies.
BIS also believes that properly applying the ``Order of Review''
procedure set forth in Supplement No. 4 to part 774 of the EAR to such
transactions leads to the conclusion that commodities specified in ECCN
3A611.y should be classified in that entry rather than in the broad and
unspecific .x paragraphs. However, based on the questions it has
received, BIS believes that clarification is desirable to reduce the
possibility of confusion about the scope of ECCN 3A611.y.
    Accordingly, this rule revises ECCN 9A610 so that its .x paragraph
will specifically exclude commodities specified in ECCN 3A611.y. This
rule makes those same change to ECCNs 0A606, 1A613, 8A609, 8A620 and
9A619, which have .x paragraphs similar to those in ECCN 9A610. This
rule also makes non-substantive changes to the .x paragraphs in those
ECCNs to add clarity through parallel construction.

Removing Unnecessary Text From ECCNs 3A611 and 3E611

    The Military Electronics Final Rule, which becomes effective
December 30, 2014, added ECCN 3A611 to control, among other things,
certain monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC) power amplifiers
(3A611.c) and discrete microwave transistors (3A611.d) based on
performance parameters that distinguished them from the MMIC power
amplifiers and discrete microwave transistors that are controlled under
ECCN 3A001.b.2 and .b.3, respectively. This rule would remove and
reserve paragraphs .c and .d. because BIS published two other rules,
discussed below, imposing license requirements on these devices under
ECCN 3A001 since publication of the Military Electronics Final Rule. As
a result, the devices' inclusion in ECCN 3A611 is unnecessary.
    The first rule, entitled ``Wassenaar Arrangement 2013 Plenary
Agreements Implementation: Commerce Control List, Definitions, and
Reports; and Extension of Fly-by-Wire Technology and Software
Controls'' (79 FR 45288, August 4, 2014), expanded the frequency ranges
covered by ECCN 3A001.b.2 and .b.3 to match ECCN 3A611.c and .d. The
second rule, entitled ``Revision to the Export Administration
Regulations: Controls on Electronic Commodities; Exports and Reexports
to Hong Kong,'' which is being published simultaneously with this rule,
imposed license requirements on MMIC power amplifiers and discrete
microwave transistors specified in ECCN 3A001 for all destinations
except Canada unless the amplifier or transistor is being exported or
reexported for civil telecommunications use. That rule also reduced the
availability of license exceptions. Those actions will allow the U.S.
Government to examine in advance the exports and reexports of MMIC
power amplifiers and discrete microwave transistors that pose the
greatest risk of diversion or enhancement of potential adversaries'
military capabilities without imposing unnecessary licensing
requirements on low risk transactions. With these changes, the
inclusion of MMIC power amplifier and discrete microwave transistors in
a ``600 series'' ECCN is unnecessary.
    In addition, this rule removes references to MMIC power amplifiers
and discrete microwave transistors from ECCN 3E611 because, upon
publication of this rule, MMIC power amplifiers and discrete microwave
transistors will not be controlled in ECCN 3A611, and it is not
necessary to control technology for their development or production in
ECCN 3E611. Such technology will be controlled in ECCN 3E001 and will
require a license to all destinations other than Canada.

Clarifying Application of the Definition of ``Specially Designed'' to
Printed Circuit Boards, Populated Circuit Card Assemblies and Multichip
Modules

    ECCN 3A611, as described in the Military Electronics Final Rule,
includes printed circuit boards and populated circuit card assemblies
for which the layouts are specially designed for ``600 series'' items.
ECCN 3A611 also includes multichip modules for which the pattern or
layout is specially designed for ``600 series'' items. Since the
Military Electronics Final Rule was published, BIS has received
questions regarding how to apply the specially designed definition to
printed circuit boards, populated circuit card assemblies, and
multichip modules. Specifically, BIS has been asked how to apply ECCN
3A611, which ties the definition of ``specially designed'' to

one characteristic of printed circuit boards and populated circuit card
assemblies (i.e., the layout) and two characteristics of multichip
modules (i.e., the pattern or layout), given that the definition of
``specially designed'' appears to require evaluation of a part,
component, accessory or attachment as a whole. In specifying ``layout''
and ``pattern,'' BIS intended that only those characteristics of a
printed circuit board, populated circuit card assembly or multichip
module need be evaluated to determine whether those items are specially
designed for purpose of applying the specially designed definition. The
questions BIS has received since the publication of the Military
Electronics Final Rule indicate that clarification of this point is
needed to prevent confusion. Therefore, this rule adds a note to ECCN
3A611 explicitly stating that, when evaluating printed circuit boards
and populated circuit card assemblies, the layout of the board or
assembly is the only characteristic that need be evaluated for purposes
of specially designed. Similarly, when evaluating multichip modules,
the pattern and layout of the module are the only characteristics that
need be evaluated under the specially designed definition.

Revisions To Prevent Negation of EAR Amendments That Became Effective
After July 1, 2014

    This rule revises three amendatory instructions that appeared in
the Military Electronics Final Rule. Without these revised
instructions, on its effective date of December 30, the Military
Electronics Final Rule would negate EAR provisions that became
effective after that rule's July 1, 2014 publication.
    First, this rule revises the amendatory instruction for Related
Controls paragraph of ECCN 3A001. That instruction, made in the
Military Electronics Final Rule at 79 FR 37569, must be revised to
avoid negating the additions to that paragraph made effective on
November 10, 2014 by the rule ``Revisions to the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR): Control of Spacecraft Systems and Related Items the
President Determines No Longer Warrant Control Under the United States
Munitions List (USML)'' (79 FR 27418, 27438, May 13, 2014).
Specifically, this rule adds references in the Related Controls
paragraph of ECCN 3A001 to: Category XV of the USML for certain space
qualified electronics; Category XI for certain application specific
integrated circuits that are subject to the ITAR; and ECCNs 3A101,
3A201, 3A611, 3A991 and 9A515.
    Secondly, this rule revises the amendatory instruction for the
License Requirements section of ECCN 4A003 that appeared in the
Military Electronics Final Rule at 79 FR 37573 to avoid negating
changes to that section that the rule ``Wassenaar Arrangement 2013
Plenary Agreements Implementation: Commerce Control List, Definitions,
and Reports; and Extension of Fly-by-Wire Technology and Software
Controls'' (79 FR 45288, August 4, 2014) made effective on August 30,
2104. Specifically, this rule replaces the term ``3.0 Weighted
TeraFLOPS'' with the term ``8.0 Weighted TeraFLOPs,'' replaces the term
``Note 1'' with the term ``Note'' and removes Note 2.
    Lastly, this rule revises the amendatory instruction for the
Related Controls paragraph of ECCN 5A001 that appeared in the Military
Electronics Final Rule at 79 FR 37573 to conform to the changes made
effective on November 10, 2014 to that paragraph by the rule
``Revisions to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR): Control of
Spacecraft Systems and Related Items the President Determines No Longer
Warrant Control Under the United States Munitions List (USML)'' (79 FR
27438, May 13, 2014). Specifically, this rule removes text concerning
telecommunication equipment used in satellites from Related Control
Note 1.

Export Administration Act

    Although the Export Administration Act expired on August 20, 2001,
the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR,
2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by Executive Order 13637 of March
8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and as extended by the Notice of
August 7, 2014, 79 FR 46959 (August 11, 2014), has continued the Export
Administration Regulations in effect under the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to carry out the provisions of the
Export Administration Act, as appropriate and to the extent permitted
by law, pursuant to Executive Order 13222 as amended by Executive Order
13637.

Regulatory Requirements

    1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been determined not to be significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
    2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with a collection of information, subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of information displays a currently
valid OMB control number. This regulation relates to a collection
approved by OMB under control number 0694-0088 Simplified Network
Application Processing System (SNAP) and the Multipurpose Export
License Application, which carries a current annual burden estimate of
31,833 hours. BIS believes that this rule will not materially change
the burden imposed by this collection.
    3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined under E.O. 13132.
    4. The Department of Commerce finds that there is good cause under
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) to waive the provisions of the Administrative
Procedure Act otherwise requiring prior notice and the opportunity for
public comment because it is unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest. This rule adds text to six ECCNs alerting readers to a change
related to those ECCNs that will be implemented in a final rule
published on July 1, 2014 that will become effective on December 30,
2014. The change itself was included in a final rule for which two
proposed rules solicited public comment. This rule also removes text
from two ECCNs created by that same final rule because, in accordance
with two recently published rules, the items covered by those ECCNs
will be controlled elsewhere in the EAR. Retaining the paragraphs would
result in inconsistent license requirements. This rule also adds a note
to one ECCN clarifying how the specially designed definition applies to
printed circuit boards, populated circuit card assemblies, and
multichip modules

license requirements. This change is being made in response to
questions from the public seeking clarifications. By making these
changes, BIS is decreasing the likelihood of continued public confusion
on the issue. Finally, this rule revises three amendatory instructions
in a rule that was published on July 1, 2014 and that will become
effective on December 30, to avoid negating provisions of the EAR that
became effective after July 1, 2014. These three revised instructions
merely preserve existing regulatory text without making substantive
changes to the July 1, 2014 rule.
    The Department of Commerce finds that there is good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness because the
changes made by this would promote clarity in the regulations. The
changes made by this rule would remove obsolete text, incorporate
language to clarify certain provisions, and to implement housekeeping
changes to prevent negating provisions of the EAR that became effective
after July 1, 2014.
    Because neither the Administrative Procedure Act nor any other law
requires that notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment be given for this rule, the analytical requirements of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are not
applicable.

List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 774

    Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Accordingly, part 774 of the Export Administration Regulations (15
CFR parts 730-774) is amended as follows:

PART 774--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 774 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C. 7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c, 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u); 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42
U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C. 1354; 15 U.S.C. 1824a; 50 U.S.C. app. 5; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR,
1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p.
783; Notice of August 7, 2014, 79 FR 46959 (August 11, 2014).

0
2. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774, Category 0, ECCN 0A606, ``List of
Items Controlled Section,'' the ``Items'' paragraph is amended by
revising paragraph x. to read as follows:

Supplement No. 1 to Part 774--The Commerce Control List

* * * * *
0A606 Ground vehicles and related commodities, as follows (see List
of Items Controlled).
* * * * *

List of Items Controlled

* * * * *
Items: * * *
    x. ``Parts,'' ``components,'' ``accessories,'' and
``attachments'' that are ``specially designed'' for a commodity
enumerated or otherwise described in ECCN 0A606 (except for 0A606.b
or 0A606.y) or a defense article enumerated or otherwise described
in USML Category VII and not elsewhere specified on the USML, in
0A606.y or 3A611.y.
* * * * *

0
3. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774, Category 1, ECCN 1A613, ``List of
Items Controlled Section,'' the ``Items'' paragraph is amended by
revising paragraph x. to read as follows:

1A613 Armored and protective ``equipment'' and related commodities,
as follows (see List of Items Controlled).
* * * * *

List of Items Controlled

* * * * *
Items: * * *
    x. ``Parts,'' ``components,'' ``accessories,'' and
``attachments'' that are ``specially designed'' for a commodity
enumerated or otherwise described in ECCN 1A613 (except for 1A613.y)
or a defense article enumerated or otherwise described in USML
Category X, and not elsewhere specified on the USML or in 3A611.y.
* * * * *

0
4. In supplement No. 1 to part 774, revise the Related Controls in the
``List of Items Controlled'' section of ECCN 3A001 to read as follows:

3A001 Electronic components and ``specially designed''
``components'' therefor, as follows (see List of Items Controlled).
* * * * *

List of Items Controlled

Related Controls: (1) See Category XV of the USML for certain
``space-qualified'' electronics and Category XI of the USML for
certain ASICs ``subject to the ITAR'' (see 22 CFR parts 120 through
130). (2) See also 3A101, 3A201, 3A611, 3A991, and 9A515.
* * * * *

0
5. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774, Category 3, ECCN 3A611 is amended
by:
0
a. Removing and reserving paragraphs c. and d. from the ``Items''
paragraph in the ``List of Items Controlled'' section.
0
b. Adding at the end of the entry a note.
    The addition to read as follows:

3A611 Military electronics, as follows (see List of Items
Controlled).
* * * * *

    Note to ECCN 3A611: When applying the ``specially designed''
definition to determine whether a printed circuit board, populated
circuit card assembly or multichip module is controlled by paragraph
.g, .h, .y.15 or .y.16 of this entry, the layout of the board or
assembly and the pattern and layout of the module are the only
characteristics that need be evaluated under the ``specially
designed'' definition.

0
6. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774, Category 3, ECCN 3E611, ``List of
Items Controlled Section,'' the ``Items'' paragraph is amended by
removing paragraphs b.3. and b.4.

0
7. In supplement No. 1 to part 774, amend ECCN 4A003 by revising the
``License Requirements'' section to read as follows:

4A003 ``Digital computers'', ``electronic assemblies'', and related
equipment therefor, as follows (see List of Items Controlled) and
``specially designed'' ``components'' therefor.

License Requirements

Reason for Control: NS, MT, CC, AT

                                            Country chart (See Supp. No.
                Control(s)                         1 to part 738)

NS applies to 4A003.b and .c..............  NS Column 1
NS applies to 4A003.e and .g..............  NS Column 2
MT applies to 4A003.e when the parameters   MT Column 1
 in 3A101.a.2.b are met or exceeded.
CC applies to ``digital computers'' for     CC Column 1
 computerized finger-print equipment.
AT applies to entire entry (refer to 4A994  AT Column 1
 for controls on ``digital computers''
 with a APP >0.0128 but <=8.0 WT).

    Note: For all destinations, except those countries in Country
Group E:1 of Supplement No. 1 to part 740 of the EAR, no license is
required (NLR) for computers with an ``Adjusted Peak Performance''
(``APP'') not exceeding 8.0 Weighted TeraFLOPS (WT) and for
``electronic assemblies'' described in 4A003.c that are not capable
of exceeding an ``Adjusted Peak Performance'' (``APP'') exceeding
8.0 Weighted TeraFLOPS (WT) in aggregation, except certain transfers
as set forth in Sec.  746.3 (Iraq).
* * * * *

0
8. In supplement No. 1 to part 774, amend ECCN 5A001 by revising the
``Related Controls'' paragraph of the ``List of Items Controlled''
section, to read as follows:

5A001 Telecommunications systems, ``equipment,'' ``components'' and

``accessories,'' as follows (see List of Items Controlled).
* * * * *

List of Items Controlled

* * * * *
Related Controls: 1. See USML Category XI for controls on direction-
finding ``equipment'' including types of ``equipment'' in ECCN
5A001.e and any other military or intelligence electronic
``equipment'' that is ``subject to the ITAR.'' 2. See USML Category
XI(a)(4)(iii) for controls on electronic attack and jamming
``equipment'' defined in 5A001.f and .h that are subject to the
ITAR. 3. See also ECCNs 5A101, 5A980, and 5A991.
* * * * *

0
9. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774, Category 8, ECCN 8A609, ``List of
Items Controlled Section,'' the ``Items'' paragraph is amended by
revising paragraph x. to read as follows:

8A609 Surface vessels of war and related commodities (see List of
Items Controlled).
* * * * *

List of Items Controlled

* * * * *
Items: * * *
    x. ``Parts,'' ``components,'' ``accessories'' and
``attachments'' that are ``specially designed'' for a commodity
enumerated or otherwise described in ECCN 8A609 (except for 8A609.y)
or a defense article enumerated or otherwise described in USML
Category VI and not elsewhere specified on the USML, in 8A609.y or
3A611.y.
* * * * *

0
10. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774, Category 8, ECCN 8A620, ``List of
Items Controlled Section,'' the ``Items'' paragraph is amended by
revising paragraph x. to read as follows:

8A620 Submersible vessels, oceanographic and associated commodities
(see List of Items Controlled).
* * * * *

List of Items Controlled

* * * * *
Items: * * *
    x. ``Parts,'' ``components,'' ``accessories'' and
``attachments'' that are ``specially designed'' for a commodity
enumerated or otherwise described in ECCN 8A620 (except for 8A620.b
or 8A620.y) and not elsewhere specified on the USML, in 8A620.y or
3A611.y.
* * * * *

0
11. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774, Category 9, ECCN 9A610, ``List of
Items Controlled Section,'' the ``Items'' paragraph is amended by
revising paragraph x. to read as follows:

9A610 Military aircraft and related commodities, other than those
enumerated in 9A991.a (see List of Items Controlled).
* * * * *

List of Items Controlled

* * * * *
Items: * * *
    x. ``Parts,'' ``components,'' ``accessories,'' and
``attachments'' that are ``specially designed'' for a commodity
enumerated or otherwise described in ECCN 9A610 (except for 9A610.y)
or a defense article enumerated or otherwise described in USML
Category VIII and not elsewhere specified on the USML, in 9A610.y or
3A611.y.
* * * * *

0
12. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774, Category 9, ECCN 9A619, ``List of
Items Controlled Section,'' the ``Items'' paragraph is amended by
revising paragraph x. to read as follows:

9A619 Military gas turbine engines and related commodities (see List
of Items Controlled).
* * * * *

List of Items Controlled

* * * * *
Items: * * *
    x. ``Parts,'' ``components,'' ``accessories,'' and
``attachments'' that are ``specially designed'' for a commodity
enumerated or otherwise described in ECCN 9A619 (except for ECCN
9A619.c or 9A619.y) or a defense article enumerated or otherwise
described in USML Category XIX and not elsewhere specified on the
USML, in 9A619.y or 3A611.y.
* * * * *

    Dated: December 12, 2014.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-29674 Filed 12-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 7684]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02727]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3366-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2014-0003]

West Virginia; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of an Emergency
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for
the State of West Virginia (FEMA-3366-EM), dated January 10, 2014, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: January 20, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident
period for this emergency is closed effective January 20, 2014.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-02727 Filed 2-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 120 (Friday, June 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28654-28655]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13150]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2014-0034; FRL-9960-85-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NSPS for Kraft Pulp Mills (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), NSPS for Kraft Pulp Mills, to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved
through June 30, 2017. Public comments were previously requested via
the Federal Register on May 3, 2016 during a 60-day comment period.
This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A
fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated
burden and cost to the public. An Agency may neither conduct nor
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before July 24, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2014-0034, to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents for this ICR, NSPS for
Kraft Pulp Mills (40 CFR part 60, subpart BBa) (Renewal), (EPA ICR No.
2485.03, OMB Control No. 2060-0690), which explain in detail the
information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the public
docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

    Abstract: Owners and operators of affected facilities are required
to comply with reporting and record keeping requirements for the
General Provisions (40 CFR part 60, subpart A), as well as the specific
requirements at 40 CFR part 60, subpart BBa. This includes submitting
initial notifications, performance tests and periodic reports and
results, and maintaining records of the occurrence and duration of any
startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected
facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is
inoperative. These reports are used by EPA to determine compliance with
the standards.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Kraft pulp mills.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60
Subpart BBa).
    Estimated number of respondents: 10 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and semiannually.
    Total estimated burden: 3,950 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $1,230,000 (per year), which includes
$821,000 for both annualized capital/startup and operation &
maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an adjustment increase in the
total estimated burden and labor costs as currently identified in the
OMB Inventory of Approved Burdens. This increase is not due to any
program changes. The change in the burden and cost estimates occurred
for two reasons. First, this ICR assumes all existing respondents will
have to familiarize with the regulatory requirements each year. Second,
the burden has increased due an increase in the estimated number of
sources subject to the standard.
    There is also an increase in the total capital and O&M costs as
currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved Burdens. This
increase is due to an increase in the estimated number of sources, and
because in year 2 of this ICR existing sources will need to repeat
performance tests that are required every 5 years.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-13150 Filed 6-22-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 17, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15190-15191]
[FR Doc No: 2020-05449]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2019-N-3131]

Jagen D. Lewicki: Final Debarment Order

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing an order
under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) debarring
Jagen Lewicki for a period of 5 years from importing or offering for
import any drug into the United States. FDA bases this order on a
finding that Mr. Lewicki was convicted, as defined in the FD&C Act, of
one felony count under Federal law for conspiracy to distribute Human
Growth Hormone (HGH) imported from China for a purpose other than the
treatment of a disease or other recognized medical condition, the use
of which had been authorized by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services, and not pursuant to an order of a physician, in violation of
the FD&C Act. The factual basis supporting this felony conviction, as
described below, is conduct relating to the importation into the United
States of a drug or controlled substance. Mr. Lewicki was given notice
of the proposed debarment and, in accordance with the FD&C Act and
FDA's regulations, was given an opportunity to request a hearing to
show why he should not be debarred. As of October 28, 2019 (30 days
after receipt of the notice), Mr. Lewicki had not responded. Mr.
Lewicki's failure to respond and request a hearing constitutes a waiver
of his right to a hearing concerning this matter.

DATES: This order is applicable March 17, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit applications for termination of debarment to the
Dockets Management Staff, Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaime Espinosa, Division of
Enforcement, Office of Strategic Planning and Operational Policy,
Office of Regulatory Affairs, Food and Drug Administration, 12420
Parklawn Dr., Rockville, MD 20857, or at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Section 306(b)(1)(D) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(b)(1)(D))
permits debarment of an individual from importing or offering for
import any drug into the United States if the FDA finds, as required by
section 306(b)(3)(C) of the FD&C Act, that the individual has

been convicted of a felony for conduct relating to the importation into
the United States of any drug or controlled substance.
    On December 20, 2018, Mr. Lewicki was convicted as defined in
section 306(l)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act, in the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, when the court accepted his
plea of guilty for the offense of conspiracy to distribute HGH imported
from China for unapproved purposes in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371 and 21
U.S.C. 333(e) (section 303(e) of FD&C Act).
    The FDA's finding that debarment is appropriate is based on the
felony conviction referenced herein. The factual basis for this
conviction is as follows: As contained in the Stipulation of Facts
incorporated into the Plea Agreement, filed on December 20, 2018, from
on or about January 2017 to February 2018, Mr. Lewicki conspired with
certain other known and unknown individuals to unlawfully distribute
HGH imported from China. Specifically, Mr. Lewicki submitted periodic
orders, and gave money, for HGH to co-conspirators, for the purchase of
HGH from manufacturers based in China. In addition, Mr. Lewicki set up
various post office boxes at private carriers in the Eastern District
of Virginia. The Chinese based manufacturers delivered vials of HGH
from China to Mr. Lewicki at post office boxes he set up. Mr. Lewicki
received approximately 90 packages from Chinese manufacturers, each
containing 200 vials of HGH. Mr. Lewicki would then sell these vials to
individual customers throughout the United States for bodybuilding and
other unapproved purposes. Mr. Lewicki's actions were in violation of
18 U.S.C. 371 and 21 U.S.C. 333(e) (section 303(e) of the FD&C Act).
    As a result of this conviction FDA sent Mr. Lewicki, by certified
mail on September 25, 2019, a notice proposing to debar him for 5 years
from importing or offering for import any drug into the United States.
The proposal was based on a finding under section 306(b)(3)(C) of the
FD&C Act that Mr. Lewicki's felony conviction for conspiracy in
violation of 18 U.S.C. 371 and section 303(e) of the FD&C Act was for
conduct relating to the importation into the United States of any drug
or controlled substance because on multiple occasions, he imported HGH
from China and conspired to distribute it within the United States. In
proposing a debarment period, FDA weighed the considerations set forth
in section 306(c)(3) of the FD&C Act that it considered applicable to
Mr. Lewicki's offense and, for the reasons detailed in the notice,
concluded that his offense warranted a 5-year period of debarment under
section 306(c)(2)(A)(iii).
    The proposal informed Mr. Lewicki of the proposed debarment and
offered Mr. Lewicki an opportunity to request a hearing, providing him
30 days from the date of receipt of the letter in which to file the
request, and advised him that failure to request a hearing constituted
a waiver of the opportunity for a hearing and of any contentions
concerning this action. Mr. Lewicki received the proposal and notice of
opportunity for a hearing on September 28, 2019. Mr. Lewicki failed to
request a hearing within the timeframe prescribed by regulation and
has, therefore, waived his opportunity for a hearing and waived any
contentions concerning his debarment (21 CFR part 12).

II. Findings and Order

    Therefore, the Assistant Commissioner, Office of Human and Animal
Food Operations, under section 306(b)(3)(C) of the FD&C Act, under
authority delegated to the Assistant Commissioner, finds that Mr.
Lewicki has been convicted of a felony under Federal law for conduct
relating to the importation into the United States of any drug or
controlled substance. FDA finds that the offense should be accorded a
debarment period of 5 years.
    As a result of the foregoing finding, pursuant to section
306(b)(1)(D) of the FD&C Act, Mr. Lewicki is debarred for a period of 5
years from importing or offering for import any drug into the United
States, effective (see DATES). Pursuant to section 301(cc) of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 331(cc)), the importing or offering for import into the
United States of any drug by, with the assistance of, or at the
direction of, Mr. Lewicki is a prohibited act.
    Any application by Mr. Lewicki for termination of debarment under
section 306(d)(1) of the FD&C Act should be identified with Docket No.
FDA-2019-N-3131 and sent to the Dockets Management Staff (see
ADDRESSES). All such submissions are to be filed in four copies. The
public availability of information in these submissions is governed by
21 CFR 10.20.
    Publicly available submissions will be placed in the docket, and
will be viewable at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets
Management Staff (see ADDRESSES) between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.

    Dated: March 11, 2020.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-05449 Filed 3-16-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18033-18034]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08611]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC18-86-000.
    Applicants: Imperial Valley Solar 2, LLC.
    Description: Application of Imperial Valley Solar 2, LLC for
Transfer of Jurisdictional Facilities Under Section 203 of the Federal
Power Act.
    Filed Date: 4/18/18.
    Accession Number: 20180418-5271.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/18.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG18-75-000.
    Applicants: CED Upton County Solar, LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of EG or FC of CED Upton County
Solar, LLC.
    Filed Date: 4/19/18.
    Accession Number: 20180419-5161.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/10/18.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2984-042.
    Applicants: Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of Merrill
Lynch Commodities, Inc.
    Filed Date: 4/18/18.
    Accession Number: 20180418-5280.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-351-004; ER17-354-004; ER17-2162-003; ER17-
2163-003.
    Applicants: American Falls Solar, LLC, American Falls Solar II,
LLC, SunE Beacon Site 2 LLC, SunE Beacon Site 5 LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of American Falls Solar,
LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 4/18/18.
    Accession Number: 20180418-5279.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1396-000.
    Applicants: NorthWestern Corporation.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation: SA 822
Utilities Agreement with MDT (Milk River) to be effective 4/19/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/18/18.
    Accession Number: 20180418-5242.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/9/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1397-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.

    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 3294 Otter Tail Power
Company NITSA and NOA Notice of Cancellation to be effective 1/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/19/18.
    Accession Number: 20180419-5124.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/10/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1398-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Second Amended IFA re: City
of Riverside Wilderness Substation to be effective 4/20/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/19/18.
    Accession Number: 20180419-5141.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/10/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1399-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original Cost Responsibility
Agreement, Service Agreement No. 5069, NQ161 to be effective 3/28/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/19/18.
    Accession Number: 20180419-5164.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/10/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1400-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation GIA & DSA
SCEBESS-003 Project SA Nos. 962-963 to be effective 7/9/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/19/18.
    Accession Number: 20180419-5193.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/10/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1401-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of Colorado.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: PSCo-WAPA-Multi CFA 350-Exb
B 0.1.0 to be effective 6/19/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/19/18.
    Accession Number: 20180419-5203.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/10/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1402-000.
    Applicants: KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Normal filing FERC NO 18 to
be effective 5/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 4/19/18.
    Accession Number: 20180419-5245.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/10/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 19, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-08611 Filed 4-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: July 11, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 132)]
[Notices]
[Page 37756]
[DOCID:fr11jy07-80]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-506-000]

Trunkline LNG Company, LLC; Notice of Revenue Surcharge
Adjustment

July 3, 2007.
    Take notice that on June 29, 2007, Trunkline LNG Company (TLNG)
tendered a filing pursuant to Section 21 of the General Terms and
Conditions of TLNG's FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1-A.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated
below. Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or
protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve
motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time July 10, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-13456 Filed 7-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 43 (Monday, March 8, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13239-13242]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04442]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0131; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01628-T]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Airbus SAS Model A330-200, -300, -800, and -900 series
airplanes; and Model A340-200, -300, -500, and -600 series airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by reports that certain oxygen supply
solenoid valves are a potential source of increased flow resistance
within the flightcrew oxygen system. This proposed AD would require a
special detailed inspection (flow test) of certain solenoid valves, and
replacement if necessary, as specified in a European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is proposed for incorporation by
reference. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 22,
2021.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For material that will be incorporated by reference (IBR) in this
AD, contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 8999 000; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website
at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For

information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-
231-3195. It is also available in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2021-0131.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-
0131; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for Docket Operations is listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2021-0131; Project Identifier
MCAI-2020-01628-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
the proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this proposed AD.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA 98198; telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Any commentary that the FAA receives which is
not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.

Discussion

    The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2020-0273, dated December 9, 2020
(EASA AD 2020-0273) (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or the MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition
for all Airbus SAS Model A330-201, A330-202, A330-203, A330-223, A330-
243, A330-301, A330-302, A330-303, A330-321, A330-322, A330-323, A330-
341, A330-342, A330-343, A330-743L, A330-841, A330-941, A340-211, A340-
212, A340-213, A340-311, A340-312, A340-313, A340-541, A340-542, A340-
642, and A340-643 airplanes. Model A330-743L, A340-542, and A340-643
airplanes are not certificated by the FAA and are not included on the
U.S. type certificate data sheet; this proposed AD therefore does not
include those airplanes in the applicability.
    This proposed AD was prompted by reports that oxygen supply
solenoid valves having certain part numbers and a certain year of
manufacture, are a potential source of increased flow resistance within
the flightcrew oxygen system. The FAA is proposing this AD to address
increased flow resistance within the flightcrew oxygen system, which
could lead to a reduced flow of oxygen supply to the flightcrew oxygen
masks, and in combination with in-flight depressurization, smoke in the
flight deck, or a smoke evacuation procedure, could lead to flightcrew
hypoxia and loss of useful consciousness, resulting in loss of control
of the airplane. See the MCAI for additional background information.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2020-0273 describes procedures for doing a special detailed
inspection (flow test) of certain solenoid valves by using the
flightcrew oxygen masks and replacing any solenoid valve that fails the
flow test with a serviceable part. This material is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority,
the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD because the FAA
evaluated all the relevant information and determined the unsafe
condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other
products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2020-0273 described previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this AD.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA initially worked with Airbus and EASA to develop a
process to use certain EASA ADs as the primary source of information
for compliance with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has
since coordinated with other manufacturers and civil aviation
authorities (CAAs) to use this process. As a result, EASA AD 2020-0273
will be incorporated by reference in the FAA final rule. This proposed
AD would, therefore, require compliance with EASA AD 2020-0273 in its
entirety, through that incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same as the heading of a particular
section in the EASA AD does not mean that operators need comply only
with that section. For example, where the AD requirement refers to
``all required actions and compliance times,'' compliance with this AD
requirement is not limited to the section titled ``Required Action(s)
and Compliance Time(s)'' in the EASA AD. Service

information specified in EASA AD 2020-0273 that is required for
compliance with EASA AD 2020-0273 will be available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2021-0131 after the FAA final rule is published.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 112 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 work-hours x $85 per hour = $255...........................              $0             $255          $28,560
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary
replacement that would be required based on the results of any proposed
actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of aircraft that
might need replacement:

                 Estimated Costs of On-Condition Action
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Cost per
               Labor cost                   Parts cost        product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85........    Up to $5,496   Up to $5,581.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the manufacturer, some or all of the costs of this
proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost
impact on affected operators. The FAA does not control warranty
coverage for affected operators. As a result, the FAA has included all
known costs in the cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA-2021-0131; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-
01628-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) action by April 22, 2021.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Airbus SAS airplanes, certificated in any
category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (8) of this AD.
    (1) Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, and -243 airplanes.
    (2) Model A330-301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342,
and -343 airplanes.
    (3) Model A330-841 airplanes.
    (4) Model A330-941 airplanes.
    (5) Model A340-211, -212, and -213 airplanes.
    (6) Model A340-311, -312, and -313 airplanes.
    (7) Model A340-541 airplanes.
    (8) Model A340-642 airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 35, Oxygen.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports that certain oxygen supply
solenoid valves are a potential source of increased flow resistance
within the flightcrew oxygen system. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address increased flow resistance within the flightcrew oxygen
system, which could lead to a reduced flow of oxygen supply to the
flightcrew oxygen masks, and in combination with in-flight
depressurization, smoke in the flight deck, or a smoke evacuation
procedure, could lead to flightcrew hypoxia and loss of useful
consciousness, resulting in loss of control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2020-0273, dated December 9, 2020 (EASA AD 2020-0273).

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2020-0273

    (1) Where EASA AD 2020-0273 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (2) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2020-0273 does not apply
to this AD.

(i) No Reporting Requirement

    Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2020-0273
specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus
SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): For any service information
referenced in EASA AD 2020-0273 that contains RC procedures and
tests: Except as required by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, RC
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.

(k) Related Information

    (1) For information about EASA AD 2020-0273, contact the EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet www.easa.europa.eu. You
may find this EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. This material may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2021-0131.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Issued on February 26, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-04442 Filed 3-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P