[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 176 (Friday, September 11, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54779-54781]
[FR Doc No: 2015-22916]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP15-513-000]

Texas Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Northern Supply Access
Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of the Northern Supply Access Project
(Project), which would involve construction and operation of facilities
by Texas Gas Transmission, LLC (Texas Gas) in Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky,
Tennessee, Mississippi, and Louisiana. The Commission will use this EA
in its decision-making process to determine whether the Project is in
the public convenience and necessity.
    This notice announces the opening of the scoping process the
Commission will use to gather input from the public and interested
agencies on the Project. You can make a difference by providing use
with your specific comments or concerns about the Project. Your
comments should focus on the potential environmental effects,
reasonable alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental
impacts. Your input will help the Commission staff determine what
issues need to be evaluated in the EA. To ensure that your comments are
timely and properly recorded, please send your comments so that the
Commission receives them in Washington, DC on or before October 5,
2015.
    If you sent comments on this project to the Commission before the
opening of this docket on June 5, 2015, you will need to file those
comments in Docket No. CP15-513-000 to ensure they are considered as
part of this proceeding.
    This notice is being sent to the Commission's current environmental
mailing list for this Project. State and local government
representatives should notify their constituents of this planned
Project and encourage them to comment on their areas of concern.
    If you are a landowner receiving this notice, a pipeline company
representative may contact you about the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the proposed facilities. The company
would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement. However, if
the Commission approves the Project, that approval conveys with it the
right of eminent domain. Therefore, if easement negotiations fail to
produce an agreement and the Project is approved, the pipeline company
could initiate condemnation proceedings where compensation would be
determined in accordance with state law.
    Texas Gas provided landowners with a fact sheet prepared by the
FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural Gas Facility On My Land? What Do
I Need To Know?'' This fact sheet addresses a number of typically asked
questions, including the use of eminent domain and how to participate
in the Commission's proceedings. It is also available for viewing on
the FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov).

Public Participation

    For your convenience, there are three methods you can use to submit
your comments to the Commission. In all instances, please reference the
Project docket number (CP15-513-000) with your submission. The
Commission encourages electronic filing of comments and has expert
staff available to assist you at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Please carefully follow these instruction so that your comments are
properly recorded.
    (1) You can file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. This is an easy method for submitting brief,
text-only comments on a project;
    (2) You can file your comments electronically using the eFiling
feature on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. With eFiling, you can provide comments in a
variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your submission.
New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking on
``eRegister.'' If you are filing a comment on a particular project,
please select ``Comment on a Filing'' as the filing type; or
    (3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the following address: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC
20426.

Summary of the Planned Project

    Texas Gas proposes to construct, install, own, operate, and
maintain the proposed Northern Supply Access Project, which (as
described more fully below) would involve modifications at eight
existing compressor stations along its existing pipeline and one new
compressor station located in Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee,
Mississippi, and Louisiana. The project is designed to provide an
additional 384,000 million standard cubic feet of natural gas per day
of north to south transportation capacity on Texas Gas's system while
maintaining bi-directional flow capability on its system.
    Texas Gas proposes to modify seven existing compressor stations
located in Lawrence and Dearborn Counties, Indiana; Webster,
Breckinridge, and Jefferson Counties, Kentucky; Tipton County,
Tennessee; and Coahoma County, Mississippi, by installing yard and
station pipeline and various auxiliary facilities. Texas Gas also
proposes to modify the existing Bastrop Compressor Station in Morehouse
Parish, Louisiana by classifying four existing compressor units as
back-up units (a total of 7,040 horsepower) and adding one new 9,688
horsepower turbine compressor unit. The Project also includes the
construction and operation of the new 23,877 horsepower Harrison
Compressor Station in Hamilton County, Ohio.

    The general location of the Project facilities is shown in Appendix
1.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The appendices referenced in this notice will not appear in
the Federal Register. Copies of appendices were sent to all those
receiving this notice in the mail and are available at www.ferc.gov
using the link called ``eLibrary'' or from the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, or call
(202) 502-8371. For instructions on connecting to eLibrary, refer to
the last page of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Land Requirements for Construction

    Construction of the proposed facilities would disturb about 146
acres of land. Following construction, Texas Gas would retain about 13
acres to operate the new facilities, the remaining acreage would be
restored and revert to former uses.

The EA Process

    The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the
Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could
result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us
\2\ to discover and address concerns the public may have about
proposals. This discovery process is referred to as ``scoping''. The
main goal of the scoping process is to focus the analysis in the EA on
the important environmental issues. By this notice, the Commission
requests public comments on the scope of the issues to address in the
EA. We will consider all filed comments during the preparation of the
EA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ ``We,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the environmental staff
of the Commission's Office of Energy Projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the EA we will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of
the construction and operation and maintenance of the planned Project
under these general headings:
     Geology and soils;
     water resources, fisheries, and wetlands;
     vegetation and wildlife, including migratory birds;
     endangered and threatened species;
     land use, including residential, commercial, and prime
farmland uses;
     cultural resources;
     socioeconomics;
     air quality and noise;
     public safety; and
     cumulative impacts.
    We will also evaluate reasonable alternatives to the proposed
Project or portions of the Project, and make recommendations on how to
lessen or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
    The EA will present our independent analysis of the issues. The EA
will be available in the public record through eLibrary. Depending on
the comments received durin ghte scoping process, we may also publish
and distribute the EA to the public for an allotted comment period. We
will consider all comments on the EA before making our recommendations
to the Commission. To ensure we have the opportunity to consider and
address your comments, please carefully follow the instructions in the
Public Participation section of this notice, beginning on page 2.
    With this notice, we are asking agencies with jurisdiction by law
and/or special expertise with respect to the environmental issues
related to this Project to formally cooperate with us in the
preparation of the EA.\3\ Agencies that would like to request
cooperating agency status should follow the instructions for filing
comments provided under the Public Participation section of this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Council on Environmental Quality regulations addressing
cooperating agency responsibilities are at Title 40, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 1501.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consultations Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act

    In accordance with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
implementing regulations for Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, we are using this notice to initiate consultation
with applicable State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPO), and to
solicit their views and those of other government agencies, interested
Indian tribes, and the public on the Project's potential effects on
historic properties.\4\ We will define the Project-specific Area of
Potential Effects (APE) in consultation with the SHPOs as the Project
develops. On natural gas facility projects, the APE at a minimum
encompasses all areas subject to ground disturbance (examples include
construction right-of-way, contractor/pipe storage yards, compressor
stations, and access roads). Our EA for this project will document our
findings on the impacts on historic properties and summarize the status
of consultations under Section 106.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation regulations
are at Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 800. Those
regulations define historic properties as any prehistoric or
historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in
or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Environmental Mailing List

    The environmental mailing list includes: federal, state, and local
government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest groups; Native American Tribes; other
interested parties; and local libraries and newspapers. This list also
includes all affected landowners (as defined in the Commission's
regulations) who are potential right-of-way grantors, whose property
may be used temporarily for Project purposes, or who own homes within
certain distances of aboveground facilities, and anyone who submits
comments on the Project. We will update the environmental mailing list
as the analysis proceeds to ensure that we send the information related
to this environmental review to all individuals, organizations, and
government entities interested in and/or potentially affected by the
proposed Project.
    If we publish and distribute the EA, copies will be sent to the
environmental mailing list for public review and comment. If you would
prefer to receive a paper copy of the document instead of the CD
version or would like to remove your name from the mailing list, please
return the attached Information Request (Appendix 2).

Becoming an Intervenor

    In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want
to become an ``intervenor'' which is an official party to the
Commission's proceeding. Intervenors play a more formal role in the
process and are able to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be heard
by the courts if they choose to appeal the Commission's final ruling.
An intervenor formally participates in the proceeding by filing a
request to intervene. Instructions for becoming an intervenor are in
the ``Document-less Intervention Guide'' under the ``e-filing'' link on
the Commission's Web site. Motions to intervene are more fully
described at http://www.ferc.gov/resources/guides/how-to/intervene.asp.

Additional Information

    Additional information about the Project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. Click on the
eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field (i.e., CP15-
513). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders,
notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription that

allows you to keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in
specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time you spend
researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm.
    Finally, public meetings or site visits will be posted on the
Commission's calendar located at www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along with other related information.

     Dated: September 4, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-22916 Filed 9-10-15; 8:45 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 30, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 209)]
[Notices]
[Page 63294-63295]
[DOCID:fr30oc06-57]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP07-4-000; CP07-5-000; CP07-6-000]

Mississippi Hub, L.L.C.; Notice of Application

October 20, 2006.
    On October 10, 2006, in Docket Nos. CP07-4-000, CP07-5-000 and
CP07-6-000, Mississippi Hub, L.L.C. (MS HUB), pursuant to section 7(c)
of the Natural Gas Act, as amended, and part 157, subparts A and F, and
part 284, subpart G of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's
(Commission) regulations, filed requests for: authorization to
construct, own, and operate the MS HUB Storage Project; a Subpart F
construction, operation and abandonment blanket certificate (CP07-5-
000); and, a Subpart G transportation blanket certificate (CP07-6-000).
MS HUB also seeks: approval of its pro forma tariff; authorization to
charge market-based rates for the proposed storage services; and,
waiver of certain Commission regulations. Further, MS HUB asks that the
Commission issue requested authorizations by February 15, 2007 so that:
construction may start in spring 2007; initial storage injections can
commence in spring and summer of 2008; and, withdrawals can begin by
December 31, 2008. Start-up in this timeframe also would coincide with
proposed in-service dates of certain Gulf Coast region liquefied
natural gas import terminals.
    The new, high-deliverability storage facility would be located in
Simpson and Jefferson Davis Counties, Mississippi. The facility would
have initial interconnections with two interstate (Southern Natural Gas
Co. and Gulf South Pipeline) and one intrastate (CrossTex Energy) gas
pipeline systems. Due to the sequential construction process associated
with the solution mining of the two proposed caverns, MS HUB requests
that the Commission authorize construction over a five-year period.
    Questions concerning the application should be directed to by
calling<PHONE_NUMBER> or J. Gordon Pennington, Attorney at Law, 2707
N. Kensington St., Arlington, Virginia 22207 or at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to
intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary
of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the
applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of
filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant
and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the
proceeding. However, a person does not have to intervene in order to
have comments considered.
    The second way to participate is by filing with the Secretary of
the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and two copies of
comments in support of or in opposition to this project. The Commission
will consider these comments in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will not serve to make the
filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's rules require that
persons filing comments in opposition to the project provide copies of
their protests only to the party or parties directly involved in the
protest.
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a) (1) (iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's web site under the

``e-Filing'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. The Commission strongly

encourages intervenors to file electronically.
    The Commission may issue a preliminary determination on non-
environmental issues prior to the completion of its review of the
environmental aspects of the Projects. This preliminary determination
typically considers such issues as the need for the Project and its
economic effect on other pipelines in the area and on land and
communities.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: November 9, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-18128 Filed 10-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 139 (Friday, July 21, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33837-33839]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15288]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2016-0384; Airspace Docket No. 17-ASO-14]

Proposed Amendment of Class D and Class E Airspace, Elizabeth
City, NC

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to remove the Notice to Airmen (NOTAM)
part-time status from the legal description of the Class E airspace
area designated as an extension at Elizabeth City CGAS/Regional
Airport, Elizabeth City, NC, and add NOTAM part-time language
information to Class E surface area airspace. This proposal would bring
the airspace descriptions in line with the airspace hours listed in the
applicable Chart Supplement. This action also would update the
geographic coordinates of the airport and the Woodville non-directional
radio beacon (NDB) in the associated Class D and E airspace. Also, an
editorial change would be made to the Class D and E surface area
airspace legal descriptions replacing Airport/Facility Directory with
the term Chart Supplement.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 5, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Bldg. Ground Floor Rm. W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; Telephone: 1-800-
647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify the Docket No. FAA-2016-
0384; Airspace Docket No. 17-ASO-14, at the beginning of your comments.
You may also submit and review received comments through the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments received, and any final
disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    FAA Order 7400.11A, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed on line at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
The Order is also available for inspection at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of
FAA Order 7400.11A at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O.
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend Class D and Class E airspace at Elizabeth City CGAS/
Regional Airport, Elizabeth City, NC, to ensure the efficient use of
airspace within the National Airspace System.

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and
suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned
regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically invited
on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and
energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted
in triplicate to the address listed above. You may also submit comments
through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Persons wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on
this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket
No. FAA-2016-0384; Airspace Docket No. 17-ASO-14.'' The postcard will
be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded from and
comments submitted through http://www.regulations.gov. Recently
published rulemaking documents can also be accessed through the FAA's
Web page at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
Holidays. An informal docket may also be examined between 8:00 a.m. and
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays at the office
of the Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, Room
350, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11A, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2016, and effective
September 15, 2016. FAA Order 7400.11A is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11A lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is considering an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by eliminating the NOTAM information that
reads, ``This Class D airspace is effective during the specific dates
and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective
date and time will thereafter be continuously published in the Airport/
Facility Directory.'' from the regulatory text of Class E airspace
designated as an extension to Class D, Elizabeth City CGAS/Regional
Airport, Elizabeth City, NC.
    This proposal also would add NOTAM part-time status information to
the regulatory text in Class E surface area airspace. This would bring
the airspace descriptions in Order 7400.11A in line with the airspace
hours listed in the applicable Chart Supplement. Additionally, the
geographic coordinates of the airport and Woodville NDB would be
adjusted to coincide with the FAAs aeronautical database.
    Class D and Class E airspace designations are published in
paragraph 5000, 6002, 6004, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order
7400.11A, dated August 3, 2016, and effective September 15, 2016, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal would be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.11A, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 3, 2016, effective September 15, 2016, is amended
as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ASO NC D Elizabeth City, NC [Amended]

Elizabeth City CGAS/Regional Airport, NC
    (Lat. 36[deg]15'38'' N., long. 76[deg]10'28'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
2,500 feet within a 4.1-mile radius of Elizabeth City CGAS/Regional
Airport. This Class D airspace area is effective during the specific
dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The
effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in
the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6002 Class E Surface Area Airspace.

* * * * *

ASO NC E2 Elizabeth City, NC [Amended]

Elizabeth City CGAS/Regional Airport, NC
    (Lat. 36[deg]15'38'' N., long. 76[deg]10'28'' W.)

    Within a 4.1-mile radius of Elizabeth City CGAS/Regional
Airport. This Class E airspace area is effective during the specific
dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The
effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in
the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Designated as an Extension to a
Class D Surface Area.

* * * * *

ASO NC E4 Elizabeth City, NC [Amended]

Elizabeth City CGAS/Regional Airport, NC
    (Lat. 36[deg]15'38'' N., long. 76[deg]10'28'' W.)
Elizabeth City VOR/DME
    (Lat. 36[deg]15'27'' N., long. 76[deg]10'32'' W.)
Woodville NDB
    (Lat. 36[deg]15'47'' N., long. 76[deg]17'53'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 1.6 miles
each side of Elizabeth City VOR/DME 189[deg] radial, extending from
the 4.1-mile radius of Elizabeth City CGAS/Regional Airport to 9.5
miles south of the VOR/DME; within 3.3 miles each side of Elizabeth
City VOR/DME 357[deg] radial, extending from the 4.1-mile radius of
Elizabeth City CGAS/Regional Airport to 7 miles north of the VOR/
DME; within 1.2 miles each side of the 079[deg] bearing from the
Woodville NDB, extending from 4.1-mile radius of the airport to the
NDB.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASO NC E5 Elizabeth City, NC [Amended]

Elizabeth City CGAS/Regional Airport, NC
    (Lat. 36[deg]15'38'' N., long. 76[deg]10'28'' W.)
Elizabeth City VOR/DME
    (Lat. 36[deg]15'27'' N., long. 76[deg]10'32'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7-mile radius of Elizabeth City CGAS/Regional Airport, and
within 8 miles east and 4 miles west of Elizabeth City VOR/DME
189[deg] radial, extending from the VOR/DME to 9.5 miles south of
the VOR/DME.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on July 10, 2017.
Ryan W. Almasy,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2017-15288 Filed 7-20-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request EPA\ Office of Air and Radiation\ Imitate Office 2. OMB control number b. G None a 2060  0306 __ __ __ __

3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. G New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. X Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a. X Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes X No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. X Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title Clean Air Act Tribal Authority 8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) ICR#: 1676.03 9. Keywords Tribal Authority, Clean Air Act, eligibility determination, burden hours, costs, air pollution, environmental protection 10. Abstract This ICR requests clearance of EPA's review and approval process for determining Tribe eligibility to carry out the Clean Air ( CAA). Tribes may choose to submit a CAA eligibility determination and a CAA program application to EPA at the same time for approval and EPA will review both submittals simultaneously. EPA will use this information to determine if a Tribe meets the statutory criteria under section 301( d) of the CAA and is qualified for purposes of implementing an Air Quality Program. Section 114 of the CAA is the authority for the collection of information.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. Business or other for profit e. Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. X State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. X Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. G Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 22 b. Total annual responses 7 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 0 % c. Total hours requested 293 d. Current OMB inventory 480 e. Difference  187 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 0 2. Adjustment  187 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars)

a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs 0 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) 0 c. Total annualized cost requested 0 d. Current OMB inventory 0 e. Difference 0 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change 0 2. Adjustment 0 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. _ X_ Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. X Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. Q Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. Q Reporting 1. Q On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. Q Semi annually 6. Q Annually 7. Q Biannually 8. X Other ( describe) One time application 17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes X No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Tony Bynum Phone: 202 564 1389 OMB 83 I 10/ 95