[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 223 (Friday, November 18, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81782-81783]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27769]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket Nos. FDA-2015-M-3249, FDA-2015-M-3251, FDA-2015-M-3253, FDA-
2015-M-4130, FDA 2015-M-3254, FDA-2016-M-2210, FDA-2014-M-0740, FDA-
2016-M-1072, FDA-2014-M-2304, FDA-2014-M-2305, FDA-2015-M-2100, FDA-
2015-M-3255, FDA-2015-M-4981]

Medical Devices Regulated by the Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research; Availability of Safety and Effectiveness Summaries for
Premarket Approval Applications

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing a list of
premarket approval applications (PMAs) that have been approved by the
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). This list is
intended to inform the public of the availability of safety and
effectiveness summaries of approved PMAs through the Internet and the
Agency's Division of Dockets Management.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to http://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket Nos.
FDA-2015-M-3249, FDA-2015-M-3251, FDA-2015-M-3253, FDA-2015-M-4130,
2015-M-3254, FDA-2016-M-2210, FDA-2014-M-0740, FDA-2016-M-1072, FDA-
2014-M-2304, FDA-2014-M-2305, FDA-2015-M-2100, FDA-2015-M-3255, FDA-
2015-M-4981 for ``Medical Devices Regulated by the Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research; Availability of Safety and Effectiveness
Summaries for Premarket Approval Applications.'' Received comments will
be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as
``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets

Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan McKnight, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
240-402-7911.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In accordance with sections 515(d)(4) and (e)(2) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360e(d)(4) and
(e)(2)), notification of an order approving, denying, or withdrawing
approval of a PMA will continue to include a notice of opportunity to
request review of the order under section 515(g) of the FD&C Act. The
30-day period for requesting reconsideration of an FDA action under
Sec.  10.33(b) (21 CFR 10.33(b)) for notices announcing approval of a
PMA begins on the day the notice is placed on the Internet. Section
10.33(b) provides that FDA may, for good cause, extend this 30-day
period. Reconsideration of a denial or withdrawal of approval of a PMA
may be sought only by the applicant; in these cases, the 30-day period
will begin when the applicant is notified by FDA in writing of its
decision.
    The regulations (21 CFR 814.44(d) and 814.45(d)) provide that FDA
publish a quarterly list of available safety and effectiveness
summaries of PMA approvals and denials that were announced during that
quarter. The following is a list of PMAs approved by CBER for which
safety and effectiveness summaries were placed on the Internet from
October 1, 2010, through September 30, 2016. There were no denial
actions during this period. The list provides the manufacturer's name,
the product's generic name or the trade name, and the approval date.

   Table 1--List of Safety and Effectiveness Summaries for Approved PMAs Made Available From October 1, 2010,
                                           Through September 30, 2016
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        PMA No., Docket No.                 Applicant              Trade name               Approval date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BP090032, FDA-2015-M-3249..........  bioLytical              INSTI HIV-1 Antibody    November 29, 2010.
                                      Laboratories Inc.       Test Kit.
BP100064, FDA-2015-M-3251..........  Bio-Rad Laboratories,   GS HIV Combo Ag/Ab EIA  July 22, 2011.
                                      Inc.
BP120001, FDA-2015-M-3253..........  OraSure Technologies,   OraQuick[supreg] In-    July 3, 2012.
                                      Inc.                    Home HIV Test.
BP120032, FDA-2015-M-4130..........  Chembio Diagnostic      DPP HIV \1/2\ Assay...  December 12, 2012.
                                      Systems, Inc.
BP120037, FDA-2015-M-3254..........  Alere Scarborough, Inc  Alere DetermineTM HIV-  August 9, 2013.
                                                              1/2 Ag/Ab Combo.
BH110018, FDA-2016-M-2210..........  Miltenyi Biotec, Inc..  CliniMACs CD34 Reagent  January 23, 2014.
                                                              System.
BP130026, FDA-2014-M-0740..........  BioArray Solutions,     Immucor PreciseTypeTM   May 21, 2014.
                                      Ltd.                    Human Erythrocyte
                                                              Antigen Molecular
                                                              BeadChip Test.
BP140120, FDA-2016-M-1072..........  Bio-Rad Laboratories,   Bio-Rad Geenius HIV \1/ October 24, 2014.
                                      Inc.                    2\ Supplemental Assay.
BP130076, FDA-2014-M-2304..........  Cerus Corporation.....  INTERCEPT[supreg]       December 16, 2014.
                                                              Blood System for
                                                              Plasma.
BP140143, FDA-2014-M-2305..........  Cerus Corporation.....  INTERCEPT[supreg]       December 18, 2014.
                                                              Blood System for
                                                              Platelets.
BP140103, FDA-2015-M-2100..........  Siemens Healthcare      ADVIA Centaur HIV Ag/   June 8, 2015.
                                      Diagnostics, Inc.       Ab Combo (CHIV) Assay.
BP140111, FDA-2015-M-3255..........  Bio-Rad Laboratories,   BioPlex[supreg] 2200    July 22, 2015.
                                      Inc.                    HIV Ag-Ab.
BP150262, FDA-2015-M-4981..........  Roche Molecular         Cobas HIV-1...........  December 18, 2015.
                                      Systems, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the documents at
http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/BloodBloodProducts/ApprovedProducts/PremarketApprovalsPMAs/default.htm.

    Dated: November 14, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-27769 Filed 11-17-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 97 (Friday, May 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 27592]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10663]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG21-145-000.
    Applicants: Rockhaven Wind, LLC.
    Description: Rockhaven Wind Project, LLC submits Exempt Wholesale
Generator Notice of Self-Certification.
    Filed Date: 5/12/21.
    Accession Number: 20210512-5229.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/2/21.

    Docket Numbers: EG21-146-000.
    Applicants: Wheatridge Solar Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Wheatridge Solar Energy Center, LLC.
    Filed Date: 5/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210514-5177.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/4/21.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER20-227-003.
    Applicants: Jersey Central Power & Light Company, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: JCP&L submits Compliance Filing in
ER20-227 to be effective 1/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 5/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210514-5126.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1280-001.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: SCE's Response to Deficiency
Letter--WOD Formula Rate under ER21-1280 to be effective 5/5/2021.
    Filed Date: 5/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210514-5002.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1475-001.
    Applicants: Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Revised O&R Undergrounding to be
effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 5/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210514-5051.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1906-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Termination of E&P Agreement VP
Development (TO SA 2100 EP-25) to be effective 7/14/2021.
    Filed Date: 5/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210514-5001.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1907-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 3023R1 Panama Wind GIA to be
effective 5/4/2021.
    Filed Date: 5/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210514-5019.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1908-000.
    Applicants: NSTAR Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Cranberry Power Energy
Storage, LLC--Design and Engineering Agreement to be effective. 5/15/
2021.
    Filed Date: 5/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210514-5041.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1909-000.
    Applicants: Liberty Utilities (Granite State Electric) Corp.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Borderline Sales Rate Sheet
Update May 2021 to be effective 5/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 5/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210514-5078.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1911-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc., New York
State Electric & Gas Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Joint 205 SGIA among NYISO,
NYSEG, Puckett Solar SA2545, CEII to be effective 4/30/2021.
    Filed Date: 5/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210514-5119.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1912-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to Modify SPP
Holidays Definition in Attachment AE to be effective 7/14/2021.
    Filed Date: 5/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210514-5140.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1913-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., Ohio Power Company,
American Electric Power Service Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: AEP submits SA No. 6071
Guernsey Maintenance Agreement to be effective 4/15/2021.
    Filed Date: 5/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210514-5151.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1914-000.
    Applicants: Vitol Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Normal filing Change in
status to be effective 5/15/2021.
    Filed Date: 5/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210514-5167.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1915-000.
    Applicants: Big Sky Wind, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Normal filing Change in
status to be effective 5/15/2021.
    Filed Date: 5/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210514-5168.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1916-000.
    Applicants: Assembly Solar III, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Baseline new to be effective
7/14/2021.
    Filed Date: 5/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210514-5173.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1917-000.
    Applicants: Assembly Solar III, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Certificate of Concurrence
of Assembly Solar to be effective 7/14/2021.
    Filed Date: 5/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210514-5178.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/4/21.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES21-46-000.
    Applicants: Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Application under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act
for Continued Authorization to Issue Securities of Golden Spread
Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Filed Date: 5/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210514-5129.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/4/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 14, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-10663 Filed 5-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 6, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 43)]
[Notices]
[Page 9985-9989]
[DOCID:fr06mr07-92]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-55361; File No. SR-NYSE-2006-28]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change as Modified by Amendment No.
2 Thereto Relating to NYSE Rules 134 and 411

February 27, 2007.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 2, 2006, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been substantially prepared by NYSE.
NYSE filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change on September 22,
2006.\3\ NYSE filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change on
February 20, 2007.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Amendment No. 1 supersedes the original filing in its
entirety.
    \4\ Amendment No. 2 supersedes Amendment No. 1 in its entirety.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The proposed rule change consists of amendments to NYSE Rules 134
(Differences and Omissions-Cleared Transactions) and 411 (Erroneous
Reports). The proposed amendments seek to incorporate recognized
trading errors into NYSE Rule 134. The Exchange further seeks to expand
the use of the Floor broker's error account to include certain
situations involving ``not held'' orders. Furthermore, the proposed
rule change would amend NYSE Rule 411 to allow erroneous reports of an
execution involving an incorrect security, incorrect side of the
market, incorrect price or whether an execution actually took place, to
be treated as an erroneous trade.
    The text of the proposed rule change appears below. Proposed new
language is italicized; proposed deletions are in [brackets].\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Exchange inadvertently failed to identify the numbering
of Rule 134(g)(i) and (ii) as proposed new text. For clarity, this
numbering has been italicized herein. The Exchange has committed to
file an amendment reflecting the fact that this section numbering is
new text prior to Commission approval of the proposed rule change.
Telephone conversation between Deanna Logan, Director, Office of the
General Counsel, NYSE and David Michehl, Special Counsel,
Commission, Division of Market Regulation, on February 21, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
Rule 134.
Differences and Omissions-Cleared Transactions
(``QTs'')
* * * * *
    (d)
* * * * *
    (iii) Records as to all errors shall be contemporaneous to the
error and be maintained by the member or his or her member
organization. Such records shall include the audit trail data elements
prescribed in Rule 132, as well as the nature and amount of the error,
the means whereby the member resolved the error with the member or
member organization that cleared the error trade on the member's
behalf, the aggregate amount of liability that the member has incurred
and has outstanding, as of the time each such error trade entry is
recorded, and such other information as the Exchange may from time to
time require.
* * * * *
    (g) For the purposes of this rule an ``error'' occurs as described
in this subsection (g) and (h) below. When an order is executed outside
of the customer instructions as entered in the electronic order
tracking system of the Exchange pursuant to Rule 123(e). This includes,
but is not limited to:
    (i) When a held or a not held order is executed in:
    (a) The wrong security; or
    (b) on the wrong side of the market; or
    (c) at a price outside the limit price of the order; or
    (d) is over bought or over sold; or
    (e) duplicates an execution.
    (ii) When an error is committed in the execution of a not held
order as it relates to symbol, side, or price as noted in (i) above,
which causes such not held order to remain unexecuted.
    (h) When: (i) There is a failure to execute a held order when
market conditions permitted; or (ii) when a not held order remains
unexecuted, in whole or in part, due to the order being lost or
misplaced, or as a result of a system malfunction.
    (i) The Floor broker must maintain a signed, time-stamped record,
including supporting documentation of such error.
    (j)(i) For the types of errors referred to in (h)(ii) above, such
record and supporting documents must be provided to the Exchange
Division of Market Surveillance prior to the opening of the Floor on
the next trade date following the error.
    (ii) With respect to the errors described in (h)(ii) above, the
Floor broker may execute the order in alignment with half the volume of
each Exchange tape print up to the size of the order between the time
that the order was entered and the time that the Floor Broker realized
that the order was lost, misplaced or not executed as a result of a
system malfunction. If executing half the volume of an order based on
the Exchange tape print would result in more than a unit of trading,
but not a multiple thereof (such as 150 shares), the customer would be
entitled to the nearest full unit of shares rounded down (such as 100
shares).
    (iii) If the Floor broker fails to provide sufficient
documentation, (which must include, but is not limited to, the date and
time of the error, the date and time the error was discovered, the size
of the error, the stock in which the error occurred, the original
instructions, the names of all involved parties including the client
and any upstairs trader, a detailed narrative of how the error
occurred, detail narrative of discussions with relevant parties, the
steps taken to correct the error and the ultimate resolution of the
error) prior to the next trade date following the error, the Floor
broker is prohibited from relying on the provisions of (j)(ii) above.
* * * * *
Rule 411.
Erroneous Reports
    (a)
* * * * *
    (iii) Except as provided in (iv) below, [A] a report shall not be
binding and must be rescinded if an order was not actually executed but
was in error reported to have been executed; an order which was
executed, but in error reported as not executed, shall be binding;
provided, however, when a member who is on the Floor reports in good
faith the execution of an order entrusted to him by another member or

member organization and the other party to that transaction does not
know it, the member or member organization to whom such report was
rendered and the member Floor broker who made the report shall treat
the transaction as made for the account of the member who made the
report, or the account of his member organization, if the price and
size of the transaction were within the price and volume of
transactions in the security at the time that the member who made the
report believed he had executed the order. A detailed memorandum of
each such transaction shall be prepared and filed with the Exchange by
the member assuming the transaction.
    (iv) A Floor broker who fails to execute a not held order because
of the Floor broker's error as to symbol, side or price, but reports to
the customer the order had been executed in accordance with the
customer's instructions, may treat the terms of the execution report as
though they were the terms of a trade, provided:
    (1) The price and size of the erroneous report are within the range
of prices and sizes in the subject security reported on the Exchange
portion of the Consolidated Tape on the day in which the order was
erroneously reported;
    (2) the Floor broker reports the error to the customer, and whether
the error was favorable or unfavorable to the customer;
    (3) the Floor broker documents, on a trade-by-trade basis, the name
of individual authorized to accept the erroneous report for the
customer, the amount of the error, and whether the error was in the
customer's favor;
    (4) the Floor broker treats the erroneous report as though it were
an erroneous trade and his or her error account or the error account of
the member organization becomes the opposite side to the report; and
    (5) the Floor broker assumes any loss occasioned by the erroneous
report, and pays any profit to the New York Stock Exchange Foundation.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    This filing seeks to codify current recognized trading errors and
to expand the use of the Floor broker's error account to include
certain situations involving not held\6\ orders. NYSE Rules 134 and
411, related to trading errors and erroneous reports, currently require
members who ``assume or acquire'' a position as a result of an error
when handling transactions for a customer to report such position in
their designated error account. Pursuant to Information Memoranda 01-
38, 02-07, 02-19, and 06-34, the Exchange currently interprets an error
to be a mistake in the execution of the order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ A ``not held'' order is a market or limit order that gives
the broker both time and price discretion to attempt to get the best
possible execution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Current Policy and Procedure for Recognized Trading Errors. At
present, recognized trading errors fall into two categories. The first
category applies to held\7\ and not held orders and includes trades
that are mistakenly executed outside the written order instructions.
These types of errors encompass situations where the transaction was
incorrectly executed: (i) In the wrong security; (ii) on the wrong side
of the market; (iii) outside of the price instructions; (iv) for a
quantity greater than specified in the instructions; or (v) duplicating
a prior execution of the same original order. The second category of
trading errors applies only to held orders and involves situations
where a held order was executable in the prevailing market; however,
the member failed to take advantage of the opportunity to execute the
order at that time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ A ``held'' order is a market or limit order that the broker
must execute as instructed without discretion as to the time of an
execution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the current rules\8\ and interpretations\9\, a Floor broker's
failure to execute a not held order when such not held order was
executable in the prevailing market is not an error and the Floor
broker cannot use his or her error account to issue reports at prices
that the customer would have been entitled to, had the Floor broker
executed the not held order in the prevailing market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See NYSE Rules 134 and 411.
    \9\ See NYSE Regulation, Information Memoranda 01-38, 02-07, 02-
19, and 06-34.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Similar to the second category of recognized trading errors noted
above, that apply only to held orders, there can be instances where a
not held order is accepted from a customer but is lost or misplaced or
remains unexecuted as a result of a system malfunction and thus the
Floor broker fails to execute the not held order when the order would
have been executable in the prevailing market. If at the time the Floor
broker identifies the execution failure, the customer's order can be
executed in the market at an equal or better price than the customer
could have received had the order been executed in the prevailing
market, then the Floor broker will execute the order. In the event the
market is adverse to the customer's interest at the time the error is
identified, under the current rules and interpretation,\10\ the remedy
is to have the Floor broker issue a difference check\11\ or offer a
commission reduction to address any disadvantage to the customer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See NYSE Regulation, Information Memorandum 02-19, issued
April 17, 2002, clarifying the application of NYSE Rules 134, 411,
and 407A.
    \11\ A ``difference check'' is a check issued to the customer by
the member to cover the monetary difference between the execution
price and the price the customer and the member agree was the proper
price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In practice, the issuance of a difference check or commission
adjustment to resolve any monetary disadvantage suffered by the
customer as a result of the Floor broker's failure to execute a not
held order due to administrative mistake or system malfunction has
proved cumbersome. Many institutional investors do not want the
administrative burden of processing a difference check or commission
adjustment. More importantly, the issuance of the difference check or
commission adjustment is ultimately not in the best interest of the
customer because the administrative cost associated with the processing
of the difference check or commission adjustment is ultimately borne by
the customer and thus the remedy does not serve to make the customer
whole.
    Proposed Amendments to Rule 134 (Differences and Omissions-Cleared
Transactions). According to the Exchange, this proposed rule change
seeks to create greater efficiency and increase uniformity in the
handling of trading errors. This proposed rule change seeks to codify
in NYSE Rule 134 the types of currently recognized trading errors. The
filing further seeks to expand the currently recognized trading errors
to include certain types of trading errors involving not held orders.
    The proposed amendment seeks to define a trading error to include

situations when an order is executed outside of a customer's
instructions as entered in the electronic order tracking systems\12\ of
the Exchange. Under the proposed amendment, types of recognized trading
errors include, but are not limited to, the execution of a held or not
held order: (i) In the incorrect security; (ii) on the wrong side of
the market; (iii) at a price outside the price instructions; (iv) for a
quantity of shares greater than the amount of shares specified in the
order instructions; or (v) the execution of an order in duplicate.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See NYSE Rule 123(e).
    \13\ See proposed NYSE Rule 134(g)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, under the proposed amendment the definition of an
error includes when a Floor broker: (i) Neglects to execute a not held
order when market conditions permit;\14\ (ii) fails to execute a not
held order because he or she committed an error as to symbol, side or
price in the execution of said order;\15\ or (iii) fails to execute a
not held order because the order was lost, misplaced or remains
unexecuted as a result of a system malfunction.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See proposed NYSE Rule 134(h)(i).
    \15\ See proposed NYSE Rule 134(g)(ii).
    \16\ See proposed NYSE Rule 134(h)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the above proposed definition of trading errors, a
Floor broker would be allowed to use his or her error account to
execute a customer's not held order in alignment with the Consolidated
Tape, when the Floor broker incorrectly executed a customer's not held
order: (i) In the incorrect security; (ii) on the wrong side of the
market; or (iii) at a price outside the price instructions when the
prevailing market is adverse to the customer's interest at the time
that the error is discovered.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See NYSE Rule 134(d) and proposed NYSE Rule 134(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    a. Not Held Orders--Incorrect Security. \18\ For example, in
instances where the Floor broker purchases or sells the incorrect
security, and the market in the correct security is adverse to the
customer's interest when the error is discovered, the proposed rule
change would allow the broker to review reports of executions on the
Consolidated Tape in the correct security and determine if, from the
time the Floor broker executed the order in the incorrect security
until the time the error was discovered, the customer's order was
executable in the correct security. In the event the customer's order
was executable during that period of time, the customer is given an
execution in the correct stock at the price the stock traded at the
time of the broker's error or during the time the error remained
unrecognized. The broker's error account is the contra-side of this
trade and is then long or short the number of shares ordered by the
customer at the price the stock was trading in the relevant time range.
For example:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See proposed NYSE Rule 134(g)(i)(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Order: Buy 10,000 XYZ at the market, not held.
    Execution: Bought 10,000 KYZ at $98.05 at 11:20 a.m.
    Error Discovered: 11:45 a.m. prior to rendering a report of
execution.
    Result: Error account long 10,000 KYZ at $98.05.
    If between 11:20 a.m. and 11:45 a.m. the customer's order in XYZ
was executable in its entirety, then the customer buys 10,000 XYZ in
its entirety and error account is short 10,000 XYZ at the 11:20 a.m.
price.
    b. Not Held Order--Wrong Side of Market \19\. In instances where
the broker incorrectly executes a customer's order on the wrong side of
the market, and the market in the correct security is adverse to the
customer's interest when the error is discovered, the proposed rule
change seeks to allow the Floor broker to use his or her error account
to take over the incorrect position and execute the customer's order on
the correct side of the market. For example:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See proposed NYSE Rule 134(g)(i)(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Order: Buy 10,000 XYZ at the market, not held.
    Execution: Sold 10,000 XYZ at $45.10.
    Result: Floor broker takes over error; and Sells customer 10,000
XYZ at $45.10. The error account is ultimately short 20,000 shares XYZ
at $45.10 which is the sum of the mistakenly sold 10,000 shares of XYZ
taken over by the error account and 10,000 shares sold to the customer
at a price of $45.10 from the error account.
    c. Not Held Orders--Outside of Price Instructions \20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See proposed NYSE Rule 134(g)(i)(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In instances where the Floor broker executes the customer's order
at the incorrect price, the proposed rule change seeks to allow the
Floor broker to take the position into the Floor broker's error
account. The Floor broker would then be allowed to execute the
customer's order consistent with the executions, sizes and prices as
printed on the Consolidated Tape, if between the time that the Floor
broker committed the error and when the error was discovered, the stock
traded within the customer's order price. For example:
    Order: Buy 10,000 XYZ at $80.50, Not Held.
    Execution: Bought 10,000 XYZ at $80.80 at 3:00 p.m.
    Error Discovered: After close buy order limited to $80.50 is
unexecuted.
    Result: Error Account Long 10,000 at $80.80.
    If XYZ traded within the customer's limit anytime from 3 p.m. to
the close, the error account sells 10,000 consistent with the
executions, sizes and prices as printed on the Consolidated Tape and
customer order is executed.
    d. Not Held Orders--Over Buy or Over Sell \21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See proposed NYSE Rule 134(g)(i)(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In instances where the Floor broker executes a quantity greater
than contained in the order instructions, the proposed rule change
seeks to allow the Floor broker to take the position into the Floor
broker's error account. When executing a held or not held order a Floor
broker may incorrectly calculate the quantity of shares remaining to
fill the order and execute a quantity of shares greater than the
instructed amount. For example:
    Order: Buy 50,000 XYZ at $80.50, Not Held.
    Execution: Bought 5,000 XYZ at $80.50 at 3 p.m.
    Bought 5,000 XYZ at $80.49 at 3:10 p.m.
    Bought 15,000 XYZ at $80.48 at 3:30 p.m.
    Bought 15,000 XYZ at $80.47 at 3:31 p.m.
    Bought 5,000 XYZ at $80.48 at 3:36 p.m.
    Bought 5,000 XYZ at $80.48 at 3:37 p.m. (Order filled)
    Bought 5,000 XYZ at $80.50 at 3:48 p.m. (Overbuy)
    Result: Error Account Long 5,000 at $80.50
    The last execution of 5,000 shares of XYZ at $80.50 which exceed
the quantity specified by the customer is taken into the Floor broker
error account.
    e. Not Held Orders--Duplicate Execution.\22\ In instances where the
Floor broker duplicates an execution, the proposed rule change seeks to
allow the Floor broker to take the position into the Floor broker's
error account. During the execution of an order a Floor broker may
inadvertently fail to document the execution of an order or may receive
a duplicate transmission of an order and thus execute the order in
duplicate. The proposal would allow the Floor broker to take the
duplicate execution into the Floor broker's error account. For example:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See proposed NYSE Rule 134(g)(i)(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Order: Buy 10,000 XYZ at $80.50, Not Held.
    Execution: Bought 10,000 XYZ at $80.50 at 3 p.m.
    Duplicate: Bought 10,000 XYZ at $80.50 at 3:40 p.m.

    Result: Error Account Long 10,000 at $80.50.
    The duplicate purchase is taken into the Floor broker's error
account.
    f. Not Held Order--Lost or Misplaced.\23\ Pursuant to the proposed
rule change, the Floor broker would be allowed to use his or her error
account to report executions in alignment with the New York portion of
the Consolidated Tape when the Floor broker fails to execute a not held
order because of an administrative error that resulted in the order
being lost or misplaced or remaining unexecuted as a result of a system
malfunction and the market at the time the error is discovered is
adverse to the customer's interest (i.e., trading at a price worse than
the customer could have received had the error not occurred).
Significantly, this proposed amendment would not allow a Floor broker
to issue a report of execution from his or her error account in
instances where the customer merely did not like the execution, in
order to prevent abuse of the new procedure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See proposed NYSE Rule 134(h)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In instances where the Floor broker fails to execute an order as a
result of an administrative error, such as the loss or misplacement of
an order or a system malfunction and the current market conditions are
adverse to the customer's interests, the proposed rule change seeks to
allow the Floor broker to use his or her error account as the contra
party to the misplaced order in alignment with the New York portion of
the Consolidated Tape. The Floor broker would be required to execute
the customer's order in alignment with half the volume of every New
York portion of the Consolidated Tape print up to the size of the
customer order, from the time that the order was entered up to the time
that the Floor broker realized that the order was lost, misplaced or
not executed because of a system malfunction.\24\ In the event that
this results in a partial round lot, \25\ the customer would be
entitled to the nearest full lot, rounded down. Therefore if executed
volume on the New York portion of the Consolidated Tape was 300 shares,
half that volume would result in 150 shares and the customer would be
entitled to a report of 100 shares. This is similar to how percentage
orders are executed pursuant to NYSE Rules 13 and 123A.30. For example:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See proposed NYSE Rule 134(j)(ii).
    \25\ Securities are generally traded in units of 100 shares
referred to as lots. A full round lot is 100 shares. If a trade
involves securities that are not in 100 share increments then it is
referred to as a partial round lot, e.g., 150 shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Order: Buy 50,000 XYZ at the market, not held.
    Event: Order is lost or misplaced or system malfunction.
    Execution: Execution in alignment according to the New York portion
of the Consolidated Tape unless a better price is available in the
market.
    20,000 shares traded a minute after order entry time on the NYSE as
reported to the Consolidated Tape. Floor broker sells 10,000 shares to
customer at the same price of the 20,000 share execution.
    Next transaction in XYZ on the New York portion of the Consolidated
Tape was 30,000 shares executed. Floor broker sells 15,000 shares to
customer from error account at same price as 30,000 share execution.
    Next transaction on New York portion of the Consolidated Tape in
XYZ was 50,000 shares traded. Floor broker sells 25,000 shares to
customer at the same price as the 50,000 share execution.
    Customer order is now complete.
    Result: Error account sells to the customer and customer receives
appropriate report without having to process adjustments.
    In order to prevent abuse of the proposed new rules, the filing
also seeks to amend NYSE Rule 134(d)(iii) to require a Floor broker to
make and keep contemporaneous and detailed records documenting the
circumstances surrounding errors. A Floor broker would be required to
make and keep a time stamped record \26\ of the error containing
supporting information the Exchange shall, from time to time,
require.\27\ In addition, the Member Firm Regulation Division of NYSE
Regulation, Inc. would include a review of these records during the
course of its routine member firm examinations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See proposed NYSE Rule 134(i).
    \27\ The record must include the date and time of the error, the
date and time the error was discovered, the size of the error, the
stock in which the error occurred, the original instructions, the
names of all involved parties including the client and any upstairs
trader, a detailed narrative of how the error occurred, detail
narrative of discussions with relevant parties, the steps taken to
correct the error and the ultimate resolution of the error. See
proposed NYSE Rule 134(j)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The burden of proof would be on the Floor broker to substantiate
that a legitimate error occurred.\28\ In instances where the Floor
broker asserts that an error occurred as a result of an administrative
error, such as the loss or misplacement of the order, or a system
malfunction, the proposed amendment requires that a Floor broker submit
the aforementioned time stamped record to the Exchange prior to the
opening of the Floor on the next trade date following the error.\29\
Absent the required documentation, the Floor broker would be prohibited
from using his or her error account to address these situations.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See proposed NYSE Rule 134(j)(iii).
    \29\ See proposed NYSE Rule 134(j)(i).
    \30\ See proposed NYSE Rule 134(j)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Amendments to NYSE Rule 411 (Erroneous Reports). The
Exchange further proposes to amend NYSE Rule 411 to allow a Floor
broker to treat erroneous reports \31\ as erroneous trades when the
Floor broker committed an error as to security, side, or price in order
to alleviate disadvantage to the customer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ An ``erroneous report'' is a report of an execution that is
incorrect as to stock, price or whether an execution actually took
place.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    When a Floor broker commits an error as to security, side or price,
there are instances where the Floor broker issues a report to the
customer as a result of the execution. The report is issued to the
customer prior to the Floor broker identifying that an error occurred.
Currently, pursuant to NYSE Rule 411, in instances where a Floor broker
issued a report to a customer based on a transaction that was made
outside of the customer's instructions on a not held order as discussed
above, the Floor broker would be required to rescind the report leaving
the customer's order unexecuted and disadvantaging the customer. The
actual execution price and size are binding, and the trade clears and
settles in accordance with the terms of the transaction as executed.
The member and the customer resolve any monetary issues between
themselves.
    In instances where a Floor broker executed an order in accordance
with its terms but the execution details were reported in error,
members and member organizations must always accept a corrected report.
In the event the erroneous report was made to a non-member, then the
non-member may choose to refuse acceptance of a corrected report. In
those instances, the Floor broker is allowed to treat the erroneous
report to a non-member as though it were an erroneous trade.
    Pursuant to the proposed rule change, a Floor broker would treat
``erroneous reports'' as erroneous trades when the price and size of
the order would have been executable in the market at or near the time
of the erroneous transaction. NYSE Rule 411 (Erroneous Reports), in
part, addresses these situations and establishes procedures for members
and member organizations to follow in handling erroneous report
situations; however erroneous reports issued to

customers based on a transaction that was made outside of the
customer's instructions, as discussed above, must be rescinded, leaving
the customer's order unexecuted.
    The proposed rule change would allow the erroneous report based on
a transaction that was made in error as to security, side or price to
stand, provided the price and size of the erroneous report were within
the range of prices and sizes in the specified security reported to the
NYSE portion of the Consolidated Tape on the day in which the order was
executed.\32\ The Floor broker would be required to report the error to
the customer, including explaining to the customer whether the error
was favorable or unfavorable to the customer.\33\ The Floor broker
would also be required to document on a trade-by-trade basis, the name
of the individual authorized to accept the erroneous report for the
customer, the amount of the error and whether the error was favorable
to the customer.\34\ The Floor broker would then treat the erroneous
report as though it was an erroneous trade and his or her error account
would become the opposite side to the report.\35\ In addition, the
Floor broker would assume any loss incurred and any profit that
resulted would be paid to the New York Stock Exchange Foundation \36\
as currently required by NYSE Rule 411(a)(ii)(5). Thus, any
disadvantage would be borne by the Floor broker who was responsible for
committing the error, not the customer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ See proposed NYSE Rule 411(a)(iv)(1).
    \33\ See proposed NYSE Rule 411(a)(iv)(2).
    \34\ See proposed NYSE Rule 411(a)(iv)(3).
    \35\ See proposed NYSE Rule 411(a)(iv)(4).
    \36\ See proposed NYSE Rule 411(a)(iv)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \37\ because it is
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    A. By order approve such proposed rule change; or
    B. Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NYSE-2006-28 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2006-28. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSE-2006-28 and should be submitted on or before March
27, 2007.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-3795 Filed 3-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: September 12, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 178)]
[Notices]
[Page 52978]
[DOCID:fr12se08-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

September 8, 2008.
    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:
    Docket Numbers: RP03-36-035.
    Applicants: Dauphin Island Gathering Partners.
    Description: Dauphin Island Gathering Partners submits Thirty-Ninth
Revised Sheet 9 to FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume 1, to be
effective 9/5/08.
    Filed Date: 09/05/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080908-0106.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-603-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits Third Revised
Sheet 3703 et al to FERC Gas Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080904-0487.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-604-000.
    Applicants: MIGC LLC.
    Description: MIGC LLC submits First Revised Sheet No. 4 to FERC Gas
Tariff, Second Revised Volume 1, to be effective 10/1/08.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080904-0536.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-605-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits its report of
recalculated Operational Segment Capacity Entitlements.
    Filed Date: 09/02/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080904-0537.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-606-000.
    Applicants: SG Resources Mississippi, L.L.C.
    Description: Petition of SG Resources Mississippi, L.L.C. for
Waivers of Certain Internet Posting Requirements Relating to Pricing of
Storage Services or for Institution of a Rulemaking Proceeding.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080903-5107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-608-000.
    Applicants: Port Barre Investments, L.L.C. (d/b/a Bobcat Gas
Storage.
    Description: Port Barre Investment, L.L.C. (d/b/a Bobcat Gas
Storage) submits Original Sheet 1 through 162 to FERC Gas Tariff,
Original Volume 1 proposed to be effective 10/15/08.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080908-0105.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-609-000.
    Applicants: Panther Interstate Pipeline Energy, LLC.
    Description: Panther Interstate Pipeline Energy, LLC submits Sixth
Revised Sheet 4 to FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume 1, to be effective
10/5/08.
    Filed Date: 09/05/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080908-0107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-610-000.
    Applicants: Steuben Gas Storage Company.
    Description: Steuben Gas Storage Company submits its Second Revised
Title Page et al to FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 09/05/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080908-0183.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-611-000.
    Applicants: TransColorado Gas Transmission Company L.
    Description: TransColorado Gas Transmission Co, LLC submits Second
Revised Sheet 20 and First revised Sheet 21A to FERC Gas Tariff, Second
Revised Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 09/05/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080908-0186.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-612-000.
    Applicants: Trunkline LNG Company, LLC.
    Description: Trunkline LNG Co, LLC submits Fifth Revised Sheet 2 et
al to FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume 1-A, to be effective 10/1/
08.
    Filed Date: 09/05/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080908-0185.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 17, 2008.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-21299 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 185 (Friday, September 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59184-59185]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24465]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Use of Certain
Personal Oxygen Concentrator (POC) Devices on Board Aircraft

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. A Special Federal Aviation Regulation requires passengers
who intend to use an approved POC to present a physician statement
before boarding. The flight crew must then inform the pilot-in-command
that a POC is on board.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by November 22, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Scott on<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control Number: 2120-0702.
    Title: Use of Certain Personal Oxygen Concentrator (POC) Devices on
Board Aircraft.
    Form Numbers: There are no FAA forms associated with this
collection.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: In the SFAR, we require the pilot in command to be
apprised whenever a passenger, whose physician's statement prescribes
extensive use of oxygen, brings a POC on board the aircraft. Also, we
require passengers who have a medical need to use a POC during flight
to have a signed physician statement in their possession that describes
the oxygen therapy needed for the duration of the flight. The
information provided to the pilot in command is used to determine
whether an inflight diversion to an airport where medical assistance
for the passenger may be needed in the event the passenger's POC fails
to operate or the aircraft experiences cabin pressurization
difficulties. The physician statement will be used by the operator to
verify the need for the device, the oxygen therapy needed to be
provided by use of the POC, and the oxygen needs of the passenger in
case of emergency.
    Respondents: Approximately 1,735,000 passengers.
    Frequency: Information is collected as needed.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 6 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 172,694 hours.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Carla
Scott, Room 336, Federal Aviation Administration, AES-300, 950 L'Enfant
Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20024.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the

estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information collection; and (d) ways that the burden
could be minimized without reducing the quality of the collected
information. The agency will summarize and/or include your comments in
the request for OMB's clearance of this information collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 19, 2011.
Carla Scott,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business
Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2011-24465 Filed 9-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P