[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18757-18759]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06786]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2022-0140]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Columbia River, Vancouver, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a temporary safety
zone for certain waters of the Columbia River. This action is necessary
to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters near
Vancouver, WA during a high-speed hydroplane boat testing event on May
20, 2022. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels
from being in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Columbia River or a designated representative. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 2, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2022-0140 using the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email LT Sean Murphy, Waterways Management
Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 503-
240-9319, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On January 19, 2022, the H1 Unlimited notified the Coast Guard that
it will be conducting a hydroplane testing event from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
on May 20, 2022. The hydroplane event will consist of individual
testing of 10 hydroplane vessels in between the I-5 and I-205 bridges
on the Columbia River. The Captain of the Port Columbia (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards associated with the high-speed
hydroplane boat testing would be a safety concern for anyone within the
regulated area.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters within the safety zone before, during, and
after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard is proposing this rulemaking
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231).

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP is proposing to establish a safety zone from 8:30 a.m. to
3:30 p.m. on May 20, 2022. The safety zone would cover all navigable
waters of the Columbia River, from surface to bottom, starting
approximately 700 yards east of the I-5 bridge from shoreline to
shoreline heading east for approximately 1.2 miles; specifically
beginning at the shoreline at 45[deg]36'40.7'' N, 122[deg]40'11.2'' W,
northeast to 45[deg]37'08.7'' N, 122[deg]39'53.8'' W, southeast to
45[deg]36'41.3'' N, 122[deg]38'32.0'' W, thence southwest to
45[deg]36'15.8'' N, 122[deg]38'53.0'' W, and along the shoreline back
to the beginning point. The duration of the safety zone is intended to
ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable waters before, during,
and after the scheduled 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. high-speed hydroplane boat
testing. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end
of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and the duration of the safety zone. The safety zone will
impact a 1.2 mile stretch of the Columbia River during the hydroplane
boat testing for 7 hours and thus is limited in scope. The Coast Guard
will issue a Broadcase Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16
about the zone and the rule allows vessels to seek permission to enter.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and

operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental
jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the potential effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone lasting 7 hours that would prohibit entry within an approximate
1.2 miles of the Columbia River for the duration of a high-speed
hydroplane testing event. Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph L[60a] of Appendix A,
Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary
Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2022-0140 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
    Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. We review all comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may
choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that
we receive.
    Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T13-0140 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T13-0140   Safety Zone; Columbia River, Vancouver, WA.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of the Columbia River, from surface to bottom, starting
approximately 700 yards east of the I-5 bridge from shoreline to
shoreline heading east for approximately 1.2 miles; specifically
beginning at the shoreline at 45[deg]36'40.7'' N, 122[deg]40'11.2'' W,
northeast to 45[deg]37'08.7'' N, 122[deg]39'53.8'' W, southeast to
45[deg]36'41.3'' N, 122[deg]38'32.0'' W, thence southwest to
45[deg]36'15.8'' N, 122[deg]38'53.0'' W, and along the shoreline back
to the beginning point.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section Designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the COTP
in the enforcement of the regulations in this section.
    Participant means all persons and vessels registered with the event
sponsor as a participant in the testing event.
    (c) Regulations.
    (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this
part, you may not enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of
this section unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by calling<PHONE_NUMBER> or the Sector Columbia River
Command Center on Channel 16 VHF-FM. Those in the safety zone must
comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP
or the COTP's designated representative.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8:30
a.m. until 3:30 p.m. on May 20, 2022. It will be subject to enforcement
this entire period unless the COTP determines it is no longer needed,
in which case the Coast Guard will inform mariners via Notice to
Mariners.

    Dated: March 24, 2022.
M. Scott Jackson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2022-06786 Filed 3-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: December 23, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 247)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 78673-78675]
[DOCID:fr23de08-24]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-1330; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-138-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited Model DHC-7
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as: ``Transport Canada has received numerous service
difficulty reports concerning Viking DHC-7 and Bombardier DHC-8
aircraft fluorescent lamp holder damage due to overheating. It has been
determined that lamp holder overheating is a result of arcing between
the fluorescent tube pins and the lamp holder contacts when the tube is
not properly seated during installation.

Overheating of lamp holders, if not corrected, could generate fumes and
smoke.''
    The unsafe condition could result in an in-flight fire. The
proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 22,
2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Viking Air Limited, 9574 Hampden Road, Sidney, British Columbia V8L
8V5, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://
www.vikingair.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wing Chan, Aerospace Engineer, Systems
and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification
Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-1330;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-138-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2008-27, dated July 4, 2008 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''),
to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI
states:

    Transport Canada has received numerous service difficulty
reports concerning Viking DHC-7 and Bombardier DHC-8 aircraft
fluorescent lamp holder damage due to overheating. It has been
determined that lamp holder overheating is a result of arcing
between the fluorescent tube pins and the lamp holder contacts when
the tube is not properly seated during installation. Overheating of
lamp holders, if not corrected, could generate fumes and smoke,
causing concern to passengers and crew.
    This directive mandates repetitive inspection[s] for proper
installation [and functioning] of fluorescent tubes and prohibits
installation of non-arc-protected replacement fluorescent lamp
ballasts.

The unsafe condition could result in an in-flight fire. The corrective
actions include replacing any lamps that are not properly seated in the
lamp holder, and replacing any broken, non-functioning lamp holders.
Replacing all affected fluorescent lamp ballasts would terminate the
repetitive inspections. You may obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Viking Air Limited has issued Service Bulletin V7-33-01, dated
February 28, 2008. The actions described in this service information
are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 21 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $1,680, or $80 per product, per inspection
cycle.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for

safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Viking Air Limited (Formerly Bombardier, Inc.): Docket No. FAA-2008-
1330; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-138-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by January 22, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Viking Air Limited Model DHC-7-1, DHC-7-
100, DHC-7-101, DHC-7-102, and DHC-7-103 airplanes, certificated in
any category; serial numbers 1 through 113 inclusive, with
Modifications 7/2444 and 7/2445 incorporated.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 33: Lights.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    Transport Canada has received numerous service difficulty
reports concerning Viking DHC-7 and Bombardier DHC-8 aircraft
fluorescent lamp holder damage due to overheating. It has been
determined that lamp holder overheating is a result of arcing
between the fluorescent tube pins and the lamp holder contacts when
the tube is not properly seated during installation. Overheating of
lamp holders, if not corrected, could generate fumes and smoke,
causing concern to passengers and crew.
    This directive mandates repetitive inspection[s] for proper
installation [and functioning] of fluorescent tubes and prohibits
installation of non-arc-protected replacement fluorescent lamp
ballasts.
    The unsafe condition could result in an in-flight fire. The
corrective actions include replacing any lamps that are not properly
seated in the lamp holder, and replacing any broken, non-functioning
lamp holders. Replacing all affected fluorescent lamp ballasts would
terminate the repetitive inspections.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Within 1,000 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD: Perform a visual inspection to ensure proper installation and
functioning of the fluorescent tubes in the lamp holders, and
perform all applicable corrective actions before further flight, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Viking Service
Bulletin V7-33-01, dated February 28, 2008. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,000 flight hours.
    (2) Replacing all fluorescent lamp ballasts having part number
(P/N) BAO8006-1 and BA[O]8006-28-1 with new fluorescent lamp
ballasts having P/N BR9000-21, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Viking Service Bulletin V7-33-01, dated February 28,
2008, terminates the repetitive inspections required by paragraph
(f)(1) of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Wing Chan, Aerospace
Engineer, Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York
ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any
approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards
District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2008-27,
dated July 4, 2008, and Viking Service Bulletin V7-33-01, dated
February 28, 2008, for related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 13, 2008.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-30514 Filed 12-22-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 48841]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20045]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-3322-000]

PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice Establishing Post-Technical
Comment Period

    As indicated in the June 21, 2011 Notice in this docket, comments
on the technical conference that was held on July 29, 2011, to discuss
the performance measurement of demand response in PJM's capacity
market, are due 15 days from the date of this conference, or Monday,
August 15, 2011.

    Dated: July 29, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-20045 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 180 (Friday, September 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63766-63767]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22353]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2015-D-3399]

Recommendations for Microbial Vectors Used for Gene Therapy;
Guidance for Industry; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a document entitled ``Recommendations for Microbial
Vectors Used for Gene Therapy; Guidance for Industry.'' The guidance
document provides investigational new drug application (IND) sponsors,
with recommendations concerning IND submissions for microbial vectors
used for gene therapy (MVGTs) in early phase clinical trials. The
guidance focuses on the chemistry, manufacturing, and control (CMC)
information that sponsors should submit in an IND for MVGTs and
provides an overview of preclinical and clinical considerations for
these products. The guidance announced in this notice finalizes the
draft guidance of the same title dated October 2015 and supplements the
guidance entitled ``Guidance for FDA Reviewers and Sponsors: Content
and Review of Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control (CMC) Information
for Human Gene Therapy Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs),''
dated April 2008.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to http://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2015-D-3399 for ``Recommendations for Microbial Vectors Used for
Gene Therapy; Guidance for Industry.'' Received comments will be placed
in the docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential
Submissions,'' publicly viewable at http://www.regulations.gov or at
the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Submit written requests for single copies of the guidance to the
Office of Communication, Outreach and Development, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist the office in processing
your requests. The guidance may also be obtained by mail by calling
CBER at 1-800-835-4709 or<PHONE_NUMBER>. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic access to the guidance document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tami Belouin, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-7911.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a document entitled
``Recommendations for Microbial Vectors Used for Gene Therapy; Guidance
for Industry.'' The guidance provides IND sponsors, with
recommendations concerning IND submissions for microbial vectors used
for MVGTs in early phase clinical trials. The guidance focuses on the
CMC information that sponsors should submit in an IND for MVGTs and
provides an overview of preclinical and

clinical considerations for these products.
    In the Federal Register of October 14, 2015 (80 FR 61822), FDA
announced the availability of the draft guidance of the same title
dated October 2015. FDA received one comment on the draft guidance and
that comment was considered as the guidance was finalized. Minor
editorial changes were made in response to the comment to improve
clarity. The guidance announced in this notice finalizes the draft
guidance dated October 2015 and supplements the guidance entitled
``Guidance for FDA Reviewers and Sponsors: Content and Review of
Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control (CMC) Information for Human Gene
Therapy Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs),'' dated April
2008.
    This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
current thinking of FDA on recommendations for MVGTs. It does not
establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the
public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
collections of information in 21 CFR parts 211 and 610 have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0139 and in 21 CFR part 312
under OMB control number 0910-0014.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the guidance at
either http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: September 12, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-22353 Filed 9-15-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15561-15562]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07517]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0175; FRL-9976-32]

Safer Choice Partner & Stakeholder Summit 2018; Notice of Public
Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA Safer Choice program will hold its third Safer Choice
Partner & Stakeholder Summit. Safer Choice partners with manufacturers
to label cleaning and other products so consumers and commercial buyers
can easily find products with chemical ingredients that are safer for
people and the environment. The Summit provides an opportunity for
partners, purchasers, retailers, NGOs, trade associations, chemical
manufacturers, and other interested stakeholders to collaborate on
exploring issues and developing solutions that can advance Safer
Choice. The meeting will include informational and breakout sessions,
with a focus on dialogue and active participation.

DATES: The Safer Choice Partner & Stakeholder Summit 2018 will be held
on May 14, 2018, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EDT.
    To request accommodation of a disability, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, to give

EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Gaylord National Resort &
Convention Center, 201 Waterfront Street, Oxon Hill, MD 20745.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tony Thompson, Chemistry, Economics
and Sustainable Strategies Division (7406M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 564-2296; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are a Safer
Choice program partner or stakeholder. The following list of North
American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended
to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine
whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities
may include:

NAICS Code Affected Industry

325510 Paint and Coating Manufacturing.
325611 Soap and Other Detergent Manufacturing.
325612 Polish and Other Sanitation Good Manufacturing.
325910 Printing Ink Manufacturing.
325992 Photographic Film, Paper, Plate, and Chemical Manufacturing.
325998 All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation.

Manufacturing

561210 Facilities Support Services.
561720 Janitorial Services.
561740 Carpet and Upholstery Cleaning Services.
611310 Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools.
8123 Dry Cleaning and Laundry Services.
921190 Other General Government Support.

II. Background

    EPA's mission is to protect the health of people and the
environment. To further that mission, EPA certifies cleaning and other
products so consumer and commercial buyers can easily find ones made
with chemical ingredients that are safer for people and the
environment. The Summit provides an opportunity to explore topics of
importance to stakeholders and the program and a forum for dialogue on
ways to continue to improve the program, advance safer chemistry, and
increase awareness of the Safer Choice label.

III. How can I request to participate in this meeting?

    Registration--To attend the Summit, you may register online here:
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/us-epa-safer-choice-partner-stakeholder-summit-2018-registration-43987871909?aff.

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.

    Dated: April 5, 2018.
Charlotte Bertrand,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical
Safety and Pollution Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2018-07517 Filed 4-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5949-5951]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02023]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2015-4513; Airspace Docket No. 15-AEA-8]

Proposed Amendment of Class D and Class E Airspace; Hagerstown,
MD

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class E Airspace Designated as
an Extension to a Class D Surface Area by removing the Notice to Airmen
(NOTAM) part time status for Hagerstown Regional Airport-Richard A.
Henson Field, Hagerstown, MD. Also, this action would amend Class D and
Class E airspace at Hagerstown, MD by recognizing the name change to
Hagerstown Regional Airport-Richard A. Henson Field, and updating the
geographic coordinates of the airport. This action would enhance the
safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at
the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 21, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Bldg. Ground Floor, Rm W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001; Telephone:
1-800-647-5527; Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify the Docket Number
FAA-2015-4513; Airspace Docket No. 15-AEA-8, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit and review received comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public
docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any final
disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office
(telephone 1-800-647-5527), is on the ground floor of the building at
the above address.
    FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
The Order is also available for inspection at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of
FAA Order 7400.9Z at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O.
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in

Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part, A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend the Class D and E airspace areas at Hagerstown
Regional Airport-Richard A. Henson Field, Hagerstown, MD.

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and
suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned
regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically invited
on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and
energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2015-4513; Airspace Docket No. 15-AEA-8) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Persons wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on
this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket
No. FAA-2015-4513; Airspace Docket No. 15-AEA-8.'' The postcard will be
date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded from and
comments submitted through http://www.regulations.gov. Recently
published rulemaking documents can also be accessed through the FAA's
Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
Holidays. An informal docket may also be examined between 8:00 a.m. and
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays at the office
of the Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, Room
350, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRM's should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
to request a copy of Advisory circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015, and effective
September 15, 2015. FAA Order 7400.9Z is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.9Z lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is considering an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to amend Class E Airspace Designated as an
Extension to a Class D Surface Area at Hagerstown Regional Airport-
Richard A. Henson Field, Hagerstown, MD, by eliminating the NOTAM
information that reads, ``This Class E airspace area is effective
during the specific dates and times established in advance by Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Airport/Facility Directory.'' from the regulatory
text. This action also would change the airport name and navigation aid
from Washington County Regional Airport to Hagerstown Regional Airport-
Richard A. Henson Field, and adjust the geographic coordinates of the
airport for the Class D and Class E Airspace Areas listed in this
proposal.
    Class D and Class E airspace designations are published in
Paragraphs 5000, 6002, 6004 and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order
7400.9Z, dated August 6, 2015, and effective September 15, 2015, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal would be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f),106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015,
effective September 15, 2015, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

AEA MD D Hagerstown, MD [Amended]

Hagerstown Regional Airport-Richard A. Henson Field, MD
    (Lat. 39[deg]42'31'' N., long. 77[deg]43'35'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,200 feet MSL within a 4.1-mile radius of Hagerstown Regional
Airport-Richard A. Henson Field. This Class D airspace area is
effective during the specific dates and times established in advance
by Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be
continuously published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

Paragraph 6002 Class E Surface Area Airspace.

* * * * *

AEA MD E2 Hagerstown, MD [Amended]

Hagerstown Regional Airport-Richard A. Henson Field, MD
    (Lat. 39[deg]42'31'' N., long.77[deg]43'35'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,200 feet MSL within a 4.1-mile radius of Hagerstown Regional
Airport-Richard A. Henson Field. This Class E2 airspace area is
effective during the specific dates and times when the Class D
airspace area, as published in the Airport/Facility Directory, is
not in effect.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Designated as an Extension to a
Class D Surface Area.

* * * * *

AEA MD E4 Hagerstown, MD [Amended]

Hagerstown Regional Airport-Richard A. Henson Field, MD
    (Lat. 39[deg]42'31'' N., long. 77[deg]43'35'' W.)

Hagerstown VOR
    (Lat. 39[deg]41'52'' N., long. 77[deg]51'21'' W.)
Hagerstown Regional Airport-Richard A. Henson Field ILS Runway 27
Localizer
    (Lat. 39[deg]42'22'' N., long. 77[deg]44'41'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 2.7 miles
each side of the Hagerstown VOR 237[deg] radial and 057[deg] radial
extending from 7.4 miles southwest of the VOR to 1.8 miles northeast
of the VOR and within 2.7 miles each side of the Hagerstown VOR
082[deg] radial extending from the 4.1-mile radius of Hagerstown
Regional Airport-Richard A. Henson Field to the VOR, and within 4
miles each side of the Hagerstown Regional Airport-Richard A. Henson
Field ILS Runway 27 localizer course extending from the localizer to
11.8 miles east of the localizer, excluding that portion within
Prohibited Area P-40.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AEA MD E5 Hagerstown, MD [Amended]

Hagerstown Regional Airport-Richard A. Henson Field, MD
    (Lat. 39[deg]42'31'' N., long. 77[deg]43'35'' W.)
Hagerstown VOR
    (Lat. 39[deg]41'52'' N., long. 77[deg]51'21'' W.)
St. Thomas VORTAC
    (Lat. 39[deg]56'00'' N., long. 77[deg]57'03'' W.)
Hagerstown Regional Airport-Richard A. Henson Field ILS Runway 27
Localizer
    (Lat. 39[deg]42'22'' N., long. 77[deg]44'41'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.6-mile radius of the Hagerstown Regional Airport-Richard
A. Henson Field and within 3.1 miles each side of the Hagerstown VOR
237[deg] radial and 057[deg] radial extending from 9.6 miles
southwest of the VOR to 2.7 miles northeast of the VOR and within
4.4 miles each side of the Hagerstown Regional Airport-Richard A.
Henson Field ILS Runway 27 localizer course extending from the
localizer to 12.6 miles east of the localizer and within 4.4 miles
each side of the St. Thomas VORTAC 141[deg] radial extending from
the 6.6-mile radius to the St. Thomas VORTAC, excluding that portion
within Prohibited Area P-40.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on January 27, 2016.
Ryan W. Almasy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2016-02023 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P