UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D. C. 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES April 28, 2002 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Carbaryl. (Chemical ID No. 056801/ List A Reregistration Case No. 0080). Revised Dietary Exposure Analysis for the HED Revised Human Health Risk Assessment. No MRID# DP Barcode D281419.

FROM: Felecia A. Fort, Chemist Reregistration Branch I Health Effects Division (7509C)

THRU: Sheila Piper, Chemist and William Cutchin, Chemist Dietary Exposure Science Advisory Council and Whang Phang, Ph. D., Branch Senior Scientist Reregistration Branch I Health Effects Division (7509C)

TO: Jeffrey Dawson, Chemist Reregistration Branch I Health Effects Division (7509C) and Anthony Britten, Chemical Review Manager Special Review and Reregistration Division (7508C)

The Health Effects Division (HED) has revised the acute, chronic and cancer dietary risk analysis for the carbamate insecticide carbaryl in association with the human health risk assessment for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision Document (RED). These revisions were made to include processing factors submitted by the registrant; to exclude commodities that are no longer supported and to incorporate revised acute and chronic Population Adjusted Doses (PADs) and Q1 * (cancer) that were selected by the HIARC and CARC, respectively. Additionally, in response to comments from the registrant, the dietary assessments include both the 1989 1992 and the 1994 1996 consumption data (CSFII).

Carbaryl is used on commodities in numerous crop groups in agricultural and home settings. A 2 highly refined exposure assessment is needed for the RED. Detailed usage information, monitoring data, and field trial data are described in appendices to this review. Acute and chronic assessments are required as well as cancer assessments using the Q1 * approach.

CONCLUSIONS/ SUMMARY This is a Tier 3/ 4 assessment, which is the most highly refined assessment that can be conducted at this time. Changes in the acute and chronic dietary PADs as well as the addition of processing factors resulted in significantly lower risk estimates. HED has provided revised anticipated residues (ARs) for carbaryl based on USDA Pesticide Data Program (PDP) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) monitoring data and field trial data for the commodities listed in Table 1a of Attachment 1. In addition, separate acute assessments were conducted incorporating the results of the Carbamate Market Basket Survey (CMBS) (Table 1b, Attachment 1). At the present time, information from the industry sponsored Carbamate Market Basket Survey has not been completely approved for use in dietary risk assessments. Assessments which include these data are presented in this document for comparison. When quality assurance procedures have been completed, HED will examine the database for appropriateness of inclusion into dietary risk assessments for the carbamate pesticides monitored in the study.

Chronic Chronic dietary risk estimates less than 100% of the cPAD are considered by HED to be not of concern. Estimated chronic dietary exposures for all population subgroups consumed <1% of the cPAD and consequently are below HED's level of concern.

Cancer The cancer dietary exposure assessment was conducted using the Q 1 * approach. The Q1* for carbaryl is 8.75 X 10 4. . Risks estimates above 1 x 10 6 are considered to be of concern. Results indicate a maximum lifetime risk of 2.8 X 10 8 for the general US population.

Acute Estimated acute dietary exposure at the 99.9th percentile of exposure exceeds HED's level of concern for some population subgroups when CMBS data are not used and are not of concern when the CMBS results are incorporated. The acute dietary assessment when CMBS data are not used resulted in risk estimates greater than 100% of the acute Population Adjusted Dose (aPAD) for all infants (< 1 years old) and children (1 6 years old) at the 99.9th percentile of exposure. The highest exposed subpopulation incorporating all commodities using PDP and FDA monitoring data was all infants which consumed 133% of the aPAD. When CMBS data was incorporated, highest exposed subpopulation was children (1 6 years old) at 73% of the aPAD.

Although this exposure assessment is the most refined carbaryl assessment performed by HED to date, there are several uncertainties associated with this assessment which are noted in the Characterization/ Uncertainties section of this document. 3 Revisions Made to the Carbaryl Dietary Assessment This revised carbaryl dietary assessment included changes made as a result of registrant comments and additional data that were submitted to the Agency.

Uses deleted The following uses which are no longer being supported by the registrant were deleted from the dietary assessment: dermal use on poultry and in poultry houses, and the uses on barley, oats, rye, and cottonseed.

Processing, cooking and washing factors The registrant also submitted processing, cooking and washing factors which were incorporated into the dietary assessment (Table 1). Some washing factors such as those provided for broccoli, cauliflower, grapes, orchard fruit, spinach, but were not used when PDP or CMBS data were used since the residues reflect commodities that have been washed before analysis. Additionally, canning and cooking factors for green beans, tomatoes, and spinach were not used since processed PDP data were already available and used in the assessment.

Table 1. Processing Factors (bolded commodities denotes change from prior assessment)

Commodity Type Factor Used for Apple Juice Drying 0.37 2.58 Pear juice apple, pear, dried Cabbage Cooking Washing 0.1 0.25 cabbage, Brussels sprouts, kohlrabi, cooked cabbage, Brussels sprouts, kohlrabi, washed Grapefruit Peel 1.13 Grapefruit peel Lemon Peel 1.16 Lemon peel Orange Peel 1.27 Orange peel Corn Grain oil 0.25 Corn oil Grapes unprocessed raisins processed raisins 2.17 1.37 Grapes  raisins Olive oil 0.81 Olive oil Okra Cooking Cooking/ steaming Washing 0.66 0.18 0.28 Okra Peas Cooking/ boiling Washing 0.15 0.30 Peas  cooked Peanuts oil 0.29 Peanut oil Pineapple flesh 0. 54 Pineapple peeled fruit Pineapple juice Plums dried washed 0.15 0.26 Plums( prunes) Plums fresh Commodity Type Factor Used for 4 Potatoes dried fried baked boiled 0.4 0.04 1.2 2.5 Potatoes, dried Potatoes, fried Potatoes, baked Potatoes, boiled Rice polished bran 0.03 0.4 Rice, white Rice, bran Soybean oil 0.005 Soybean oil Sugarbeets sugar molasses 0.04 0.04 Sugarbeets Sugarbeets molasses Sunflowers oil 0.03 Sunflowers oil Tomatoes puree juice dry 0.65 0.52 0.52 Tomatoes puree, paste, catsup Tomatoes juice Tomatoes, dried Wheat Flour Germ Bran 0.10 0.65 1.03 Wheat flour Wheat germ Wheat Bran Almonds The dietary assessment for almond nutmeat erroneously used the almond hulls residue information. The anticipated residues were recalculated using the data shown in Table 2 and resulted in the following residue distribution files and chronic AR.

Residue Distribution File for Acute Assessment Almonds  FT 15 samples RDF # 68 Almonds  FT 4% CT Totalz= 360 Totalnz= 15 0.0614 0.0704 0.0786 0.0822 0.0826 0.0932 0.0304 0.0358 0.0380 0.0704 0.0800 0.0840 0.01 0.0300 0.0384 Chronic AR = 0.059 ppm Table 2 . Residues of carbaryl in/ on almond nutmeats harvested 14 days following three applications of the 4 lb/ gal FlC formulation at  5.0 lb ai/ A/ application ( 15.0 lb ai/ A/ season). 5 RAC Test Location (county, state) Total Application Rate (lb ai/ A) Carbaryl Residues (ppm) a Almond nutmeats Butte, CA 14.9 0. 0614, 0.0704, 0.0786 Fresno, CA 14.9 0. 0822, 0.0826, 0.0932 Fresno, CA 14.9 0. 0304, 0.0358, 0.0380 Stanislaus, CA 15.8 0. 0704, 0.0800, 0.0840 Madera, CA 15.2 <0.02, 0.0300, 0.0384 Peaches Single Serving Peach PDP Data from the year 2000 were used for non blended peach food forms where HED previously used data that had been decomposited (Allender method). The resultant RDF file is shown below. Five hundred and thirty four samples were analyzed; carbaryl was detected in 79 of those samples.

Peaches (not blended) PDP Single Serving 2000 534 samples/ 79 detects 18% CT  15% detected Residues ranged from 0.01  2.7 ppm RDF # 60 Peaches  PDP single serving 18% CT  15% detected Totalz= 438 Totalnz= 79 17, 0.003 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.011 0.022 0.025 0.026 0.03 0.031 0.031 0.041 0.042 0.046 0.049 0.051 0.052 0.054 0.057 0.06 0.065 0.071 0.073 0.083 0.087 0.094 0.1 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.18 0.2 0.21 0.24 0.25 0.29 0.34 0.37 0.41 0.49 0.5 0.51 0.54 0.56 0.58 0.59 0.76 0.94 0.94 1.2 1.5 2.7 Toxicology Information The HED Hazard Identification Assessment Review Committee (HIARC) on February 19, 6 2002 reevaluated the toxicology data base of carbaryl and selected toxicology endpoints for chronic and acute dietary as well as occupational exposure risk assessments. The selected toxicological endpoints and the doses for risk assessment and additional relevant details are summarized in Table 3. On November 7, 2001, the CARC reconsidered the cancer classification of carbaryl. In accordance with the EPA Draft Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment (July, 1999), the CARC classified carbaryl into the category "Likely to be carcinogenic to humans" and recommended a low dose linear extrapolation approach using all dose levels for the quantification of human cancer risk based on the most potent vascular tumors in mice.

The HED FQPA Safety Factor Committee (C. Christensen, 2/ 25/ 02) determined that when assessing acute and chronic dietary exposures, the safety factor should be reduced to1x for all population subgroups.

Table 3: Carbaryl Toxicity Endpoints EXPOSURE SCENARIO Old RfD PAD New DOSE (mg/ kg/ day) New RfD PAD ENDPOINT STUDY Acute Dietary (all populations) aRfD = 0.03 mg/ kg aPAD = 0.003 mg/ kg/ day NOAEL= 1 mg/ kg UF = 100 FQPA SF = 1 aRfD = 0.01 mg/ kg aPAD = 0.01 mg/ kg/ day Alterations in FOB parameters after a single dose to maternal animals Acute neurotoxicity study  rat Chronic Dietary (all populations) cRfD = 0.01 mg/ kg/ day cPAD = 0.001 mg/ kg/ day NOAEL = 3.1 mg/ kg/ day UF = 300 FQPA SF = 1 cRfD = 0.01 mg/ kg/ day cPAD = 0.01 mg/ kg/ day Decrease in brain cholinesterase in females Chronic toxicity  dog Cancer Q1* = 1.19 x 10 2 [mg/ kg/ day] 1 n/ a Q1* = 8.75 x 10 4 [mg/ kg/ day] 1 Carbaryl was classified as "likely to be carcinogenic to humans" based on an increased incidence of hemangiosarcomas in male mice Carcinogenicity  mice DEEM™ Program and Consumption Information Carbaryl acute and chronic dietary exposure assessments were conducted using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model (DEEM™) software Version 7.76, which incorporates consumption data from USDA's 7 Continuing Surveys of Food Intake by Individuals (CSFII), 1989 1992. The 1989 92 data are based on the reported consumption of more than 10,000 individuals over three consecutive days, and therefore represent more than 30,000 unique "person days" of data. Foods "as consumed" (e. g., apple pie) are linked to raw agricultural commodities and their food forms (e. g., apples cooked/ canned or wheat flour) by recipe translation files internal to the DEEM software. Consumption data are averaged for the entire US population and within population subgroups for chronic exposure assessment, but are retained as individual consumption events for acute exposure assessment. As requested by the registrant, separate assessments which shows the results using the newer 1994 1998 consumption data were conducted.

For chronic exposure and risk assessment, an estimate of the residue level in each food or food form (e. g., orange or orange juice) on the commodity residue list is multiplied by the average daily consumption estimate for that food/ food form. The resulting residue consumption estimate for each food/ food form is summed with the residue consumption estimates for all other food/ food forms on the commodity residue list to arrive at the total estimated exposure. Exposure estimates are expressed in mg/ kg body weight/ day and as a percent of the cPAD. This procedure is performed for each population subgroup.

For acute exposure assessments, individual one day food consumption data are used on an individual byindividual basis. The reported consumption amounts of each food item can be multiplied by a residue point estimate and summed to obtain a total daily pesticide exposure for a deterministic (Tier 1 or Tier 2) exposure assessment, or "matched" in multiple random pairings with residue values and then summed in a probabilistic (Tier 3/ 4) assessment. The resulting distribution of exposures is expressed as a percentage of the aPAD on both a user (i. e., those who reported eating relevant commodities/ food forms) and a per capita (i. e., those who reported eating the relevant commodities as well as those who did not) basis. In accordance with HED policy, per capita exposure and risk are reported for all tiers of analysis. However, for tiers 1 and 2, significant differences in user vs. per capita exposure and risk are identified and noted in the risk assessment.

HED notes that there is a degree of uncertainty in extrapolating exposures for certain population subgroups from the general U. S. population which may not be sufficiently represented in the consumption surveys, (e. g., nursing and non nursing infants or Hispanic females). Therefore, risks estimated for these population subgroups were included in representative populations having sufficient numbers of survey respondents (e. g., all infants or females, 13 50 years).

Usage Information BEAD provided information (F. Hernandez, 7/ 21/ 98, Attachment 9) on the percent crop treated (% CT). For the chronic analysis, the weighted average %CT was incorporated; for the acute analysis, the estimated maximum %CT was used when appropriate.

In acute analyses (except blended commodities) the adjustment for %CT is incorporated in the residue distribution files (RDFs) via addition of zero residue values corresponding to the % of crop not treated. For blended/ not further processed commodities where monitoring data are available, the entire distribution of monitoring data with no futher adjustment for %CT were used. For blended/ processed commodities where monitoring data are available and for all blended commodities where field trial data were used, %CT is incorporated into a point estimate. For the chronic analyses, the %CT is listed as Adjustment Factor 2 in the DEEM analysis. 8 Use of usage information for assessments incorporating the CMBS are described below.

Residue Data Tolerances for residues of carbaryl are currently expressed in terms of carbaryl (1 naphthyl Nmethylcarbamate including its hydrolysis product 1 naphthol, calculated as carbaryl, for most raw crop commodities [40 CFR §180.169( a)]. The established tolerances for residues in/ on pineapples, pome fruits, avocados, and fresh dill are expressed in terms of carbaryl per se [40 CFR §180.169( d) and (e)]. Tolerances for residues in livestock commodities are expressed as carbaryl, including its metabolites 1 naphthol (naphthyl sulfate), 5,6 dihydrodihydroxy carbaryl, and 5,6 dihydrodihydroxy naphthol, calculated as carbaryl [40 CFR §180.169( b) and (c)]. A tolerance for residues in pineapple bran is expressed in terms of carbaryl per se [40 CFR §186.550]. An interim tolerance has been established for carbaryl and its 1 naphthol metabolite in eggs [40 CFR §180.319].

For the purpose of reregistration, adequate magnitude of the residue data are available on the following crops: alfalfa, almond, asparagus, beans (dried and succulent), blueberry, broccoli, cabbage, celery, cherry, citrus fruits, clover, corn (sweet and field), cucurbits (cantaloupes, cucumbers and squash), cranberry, flax, grape, head and leaf lettuce, mustard greens, okra, peanut, peas (dried and succulent), pecan, pepper, pistachio, pome fruits, potato, prickly pear cactus, raspberry, rice, sorghum, soybean, spinach, stone fruits, strawberry, sunflower, sweet potato, tobacco, tomato, and walnut. Tolerances of 2 ppm and 10 ppm have been established for residues of carbaryl in pineapples and bananas, respectively. The registrant intends to support the tolerances for residues of carbaryl in/ on these commodities as import tolerances.

Adequate field trial data depicting carbaryl residues following applications made according to the maximum or proposed use patterns have been submitted for these commodities. Geographical representation is adequate and a sufficient number of trials reflecting representative formulation classes were conducted. Carbaryl residues were <LOQ in/ on sweet potato, sugar beets, corn grain, flax seed, and peanuts. Quantifiable residues were detected in all other raw agricultural commodities (RACs). For a given crop, residue levels were quite variable overall, probably owing to climactic variations, but were generally consistent within any specific field trial location.

Anticipated residue estimates are presented in Table 1a of Attachment 1 of this document. In general PDP data were used if available. Alternatively, FDA surveillance monitoring data from the years 1992 98 were used if sufficient samples were available. Finally, data from crop field trials were used if there were insufficient PDP or FDA monitoring data.

Adequate PDP monitoring data are available for the following commodities: potatoes, carrots, sweet potato, celery, spinach, lettuce (head), broccoli, succulent peas (processed) , succulent beans, soybean, tomatoes, cantaloupe, winter squash, orange, orange juice, apple, apple juice, pear, peach, wheat, sweet corn, banana, grape, grape juice and milk. FDA monitoring data were used for the commodities, lettuce (leaf), cabbage, eggplant, succulent peas (fresh), non bell pepper, bell pepper, cucumber, watermelon, summer squash, cherries, raspberry, blueberry, asparagus, cranberry, pineapple, and strawberry. Monitoring data were translated to similar crops when possible, generally according to the HED SOP 99.3 "Translation of Monitoring Data". See Table 1a of Attachment 1 for translations. Monitoring data from the years 1994 through 1998 (PDP) and the years 1992 through 1998 (FDA) were considered. Field trial data were used for the commodities, garden beets, turnips, mustards, dried beans, dried peas, 9 almonds, pecans, walnuts, field corn grain, rice, flax seed, okra, olive, peanuts, pistachio, sugar beets, and sunflower. For oysters and dill (fresh), tolerances of 2 ppm and 0.2 ppm, respectively was used in the assessment. These data are summarized in Attachment 1 below.

One half the weighted average of the limits of detection (LOD) will be used in the dietary assessment for all treated non detectable (ND) residues. Detectable residues from composite monitoring data for nonblended food forms were used to generate residue values in single units using the methods described in the H. Allender paper dated 5/ 26/ 99 "Statistical methods for Use of Composite Data in Acute Dietary Risk Assessment." The "decomposited" residues were then included in residue distribution files (RDF) for the probabilistic analysis. Biological and Economic Analysis Division (BEAD) supplied %CT which were incorporated into the anticipated residue or residue distribution file when appropriate.

Carbamate Market Basket Survey (CMBS)

A separate dietary assessment was conducted utilizing the CMBS results. These data are currently under review by the Agency and have not been approved for use in dietary assessments. The CMBS Task Force conducted a year long, national survey of carbamate residues on selected food commodities purchased at grocery stores. Residue data from a market basket survey are considered close approximations to residues potentially found at most `dinner plates' and is generally considered the most appropriate survey type for use in pesticide risk and exposure assessment. The CMBS collected up to 400 single serve samples of 8 different crops (apple, banana, broccoli, grape, lettuce, orange, peach and tomato). These data are used in the acute dietary analysis directly via RDFs incorporating %CT for all food forms considered to be partially or not blended. For blended commodities, the entire distribution of data with no further adjustment for %CT was done. If CMBS data were not available, then PDP or FDA monitoring or field trial data were used. CMBS data were translated to similar commodities when feasible (Table 1b, Attachment 1); however, if PDP monitoring data were available for the processed commodity, then CMBS data were not translated (i. e., PDP orange juice data were used instead of CMBS data for oranges). The RDFs are shown in Attachment 1 of this document.

Processing Factors Most of the carbaryl processing factors (see Table 1) were obtained from processing studies submitted by the registrant either in response to the preliminary dietary risk assessment or those compiled in a memo entitled "Carbaryl Anticipated Residues for Carcinogenic Dietary Risk Assessment", S. Hummel, 12/ 3/ 93. The rice processing factors were from a review by Thurston Morton (D216242, 9/ 17/ 98). Default processing factors were maintained for all commodities not included in Table 1 in this document.

Results This is a Tier 3/ 4 assessment, which is the most highly refined assessment that can be conducted at this time. Processing factors have been incorporated to the fullest extent possible. A sensitivity analysis, setting all non detectable residue values to zero was conducted to test the relative contribution of 1/ 2 LOD residues to the dietary risk. These results are based on 1989 to 92 consumption data. When the assessments were done using the 1994 1998 consumption data, no significant differences in dietary exposure were found. 10 HED has provided revised anticipated residues (ARs) for carbaryl based on USDA PDP and FDA monitoring data, field trial data, and CMBS data for the commodities listed in Table 1a and 1b of Attachment 1.

Chronic Chronic dietary risk estimates less than 100% of the cPAD are not of concern. Carbaryl estimated dietary exposure to the general US population and all population subgroups consumed <1% of the cPAD and are therefore not of concern. (Table 4 and Attachment 2).

Cancer The cancer dietary exposure assessment was conducted using the Q 1 * approach. The Q1* for carbaryl is 8.75 X 10 4. . Risks estimates above 1 x 10 6 are considered to be of concern. Results indicate a maximum lifetime risk of 2.8 x 10 8 for the general U. S. population. (Table 4 and Attachment 2). 1 aPAD/ cPAD = acute/ chronic Population Adjusted Dose = Acute or Chronic RfD FQPA Safety Factor 11 Table 4. Results of the Carbaryl Chronic and Cancer Dietary Analyses.

Chronic Pop. Subgroup 1989 92 1994 1998 Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % cPAD Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % cPAD Gen. Population 0.000032 <1 0.000035 <1 All Infants 0.000054 <1 0.000059 <1 Children 1  6 years 0. 000057 <1 0.000074 <1 Children 7  12 years 0. 000036 <1 0.000034 <1 Females 13  50 years 0. 000026 <1 0.000028 <1 Males 13 19 years 0. 000022 <1 0.000026 <1 Males 20+ years 0. 000031 <1 0.000032 <1 Seniors 55+ 0.000031 <1 0.000030 <1 Cancer Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) Lifetime risk Gen. Population 0.000032 2.8 x 10 8 0.000035 3.04 X 10 8 Acute The acute dietary assessment resulted in risk estimates greater than 100% of the acute Population Adjusted Dose (aPAD) for the population subgroups, all infants and children (1 to 6 years old) at the 99.9th percentile of exposure (Table 5). The highest exposed subpopulation using PDP and FDA monitoring data was all infants at 133% of the aPAD. When CMBS data are incorporated, the acute risk estimates are below the Agency's level of concern (< 100% aPAD 1 ) at the 99.9 th exposure percentile for the general U. S. population (46% of the aPAD) and all population subgroups (Table 6). The acute dietary exposure estimates for the highest exposed population subgroups, all infants (< 1 years old) and children are 73% of the aPAD. Peaches and apples were found to be the most significant contributor to the risk estimate. (Attachments 3, 6, 7 and 8).

Characterization/ Uncertainties of the Risk Estimates ° No detectable residues were found in/ on several commodities: carrots, chicory, flax seed, horseradish, parsnip, salsify, potato, celery, canned spinach, head lettuce, leaf lettuce, rhubarb, sugarbeets, Swiss chard, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, kohlrabi, soybean, corn, banana, peanuts, meat, meat fat, and milk. Sensitivity analyses conducted by eliminating crops where no detectable residues were found showed that risk estimates were not significantly affected by assuming zero 12 in place of 1/ 2 LOD on samples reported as ND. (Attachments 5).

° The consumption database used in the dietary exposure analysis, CSFII 1989 1992, has a limited number of individuals for the age group infants less than one year old. The USDA has conducted the Supplemental Children's Survey (approximately 5000 children) which will be available for use in the near future.

° The results of the Critical Exposure Contribution analysis showed that peaches and apples comprised a large percentage of the residues found in the tail end of acute exposure (Attachments 4) for children and infants, respectively.

° Detectable residues from composite monitoring data for non blended food forms were used to generate residue values in single units using the methods described in the H. Allender paper dated 5/ 26/ 99 "Statistical methods for Use of Composite Data in Acute Dietary Risk Assessment." The "decomposited" residues were then included in residue distribution files (RDF) for the probabilistic analysis. Although there is a statistical basis for using these data, some degree of uncertainty can be associated with this method. 13 Table 5. Results of the Carbaryl Acute Dietary Analyses (Market Survey Data Not Included)

All Commodities (1989 92 Consumption Data)

Pop. Subgroup 99.9 th Percentile 99 th Percentile 95 th Percentile Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Gen. Population 0.005989 60 0.001381 14 0.000505 5 All Infants 0.013251 133 0.003683 37 0.000864 9 Children 1  6 0. 010974 110 0.002552 26 0.001309 13 Children 7  12 0.008721 87 0.001644 16 0.000722 7 Females 13  50 0.004444 44 0.000918 9 0. 000318 3 Males 13 19 yrs 0. 003596 36 0.000899 9 0. 000428 4 Males 20+ yrs 0. 004223 42 0.000929 9 0. 000318 3 Seniors 55+ yrs 0.005789 58 0.001068 11 0.000307 3 All Commodities (1994 98 Consumption Data)

Pop. Subgroup 99.9 th Percentile 99 th Percentile 95 th Percentile Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Gen. Population 0.006150 62 0.001467 15 0.000508 5 All Infants 0.013420 134 0.004027 40 0.000922 9 Children 1  6 0. 013812 138 0.003282 33 0.001460 15 Children 7  12 0.007073 71 0.001473 15 0.000685 7 Females 13  50 0.004794 48 0.000997 10 0.000322 3 Males 13 19 yrs 0. 005181 52 0.000929 9 0. 000420 4 Males 20+ yrs 0. 003940 39 0.000922 9 0. 000336 3 Seniors 55+ yrs 0.005442 54 0.001003 10 0.000313 3 14 Table 6. Results of the Carbaryl Acute Dietary Analyses (Market Basket Survey Data Included)

All Commodities (1989 92 Consumption Data)

Pop. Subgroup 99.9 th Percentile 99 th Percentile 95 th Percentile Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Gen. Population 0.004623 46 0.001241 12 0.000462 5 All Infants 0.007272 73 0.002875 29 0.000593 6 Children 1  6 0. 007344 73 0.002280 23 0.001241 12 Children 7  12 0.006238 62 0.001345 13 0.000680 7 Females 13  50 0.003546 35 0.000858 9 0. 000299 3 Males 13 19 yrs 0. 002723 27 0.000815 8 0. 000409 4 Males 20+ yrs 0. 003423 34 0.000836 8 0. 000297 3 Seniors 55+ yrs 0.004810 48 0.000905 9 0. 000275 3 All Commodities (1994 98 Consumption data)

Pop. Subgroup 99.9 th Percentile 99 th Percentile 95 th Percentile Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Gen. Population 0.004865 49 0.001303 13 0.000465 5 All Infants 0.008091 81 0.002630 26 0.000650 7 Children 1  6 0. 009481 95 0.002799 28 0.001348 13 Children 7  12 0.004921 49 0.001214 12 0.000643 6 Females 13  50 0.004224 42 0.000878 9 0. 000298 3 Males 13 19 yrs 0. 004515 45 0.000867 9 0. 000402 4 Males 20+ yrs 0. 003359 34 0.000831 8 0. 000311 3 Seniors 55+ yrs 0.004649 46 0.000819 8 0. 000279 3 15 Table 7. Results of the Carbaryl Sensitivity Analyses.

Acute  All Commodities at the 99.9th percentile of exposure (Market Basket Survey Data Not Included)

Pop. Subgroup All commodities Eliminating Peaches Eliminating Apples Eliminating Commodities with No Detectable Residues Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Exposure (mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Gen. Population 0.005989 60 0.005451 55 0.004943 49 0.005870 59 All Infants 0.013251 133 0.007188 72 0.011784 118 0.012965 130 Children 1  6 0. 010974 110 0.010164 102 0.008201 82 0.0010765 108 Children 7  12 0.008721 87 0.008243 82 0.006867 69 0.008555 86 Females 13  50 0.004444 44 0.004262 43 0.003890 39 0.004434 44 Males 13 19 yrs 0. 003596 36 0.003535 35 0.003014 30 0.003802 38 Males 20+ yrs 0. 004223 42 0.003949 39 0.003575 36 0.004178 42 Seniors 55+ yrs 0.005789 58 0.005456 55 0.005094 51 0.005703 57 16 Atttachments Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Attachment 2: Chronic and Cancer Dietary Exposure Analysis: All Commodities Attachment 3: Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis : All Commodities Attachment 4: Acute  Critical Exposure Contribution Analysis Attachment 5: Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis : Excluding all Commodities with No detects Attachment 6: Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis : Excluding Peaches Attachment 7: Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis : Excluding Apples Attachment 8: Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis : Market Basket Survey  All Commodities Attachment 9: Quantitative Usage Analysis (QUA) Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files 17 Table 1a: Summary of Anticipated Residues for Carbaryl (Market Basket Data not included)

Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max Crop Group 1: Root and Tuber vegetable Beets, garden (roots) 11 Uncooked 14 Boiled 2 garden beets FT 0.024 RDF #1 NB 17 27 Beets, garden (roots) 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 51 Cured: NFS (smoked/ pickled/ 2 garden beets FT 0.024 RDF #1 PB 17 27 Carrots 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 2 carrots PDP 0. 0116 RDF # 2 NB 4 6 Carrots 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 44 Frozen: Boiled 2 carrots PDP 0.0116 RDF #2 PB 4 6 Horseradish 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 2 carrots PDP 0. 0116 RDF #3 NB 1 3 2 Horseradish 34 Canned: Boiled 51 Cured: NFS (smoked/ pickled/ 2 carrots PDP 0. 0116 RDF #3 PB 1 3 2 Parsnips 14 Boiled 2 carrots PDP 0. 0116 RDF #3 NB 1 3 2 Potatoes/ white dry 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 15 Fried 31 Canned: NFS 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 2 potato PDP 0. 0119 PE = 0.00036 B 2 3 Potatoes/ white peel only 13 Baked 15 Fried 2 potato PDP 0. 0119 RDF # 4 NB 2 3 Potatoes/ white peeled 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 2 potato PDP 0.0119 RDF # 4 NB 2 3 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max 18 32 Canned: Cooked 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 43 Frozen: Baked 45 Frozen: Fried 0.0119 RDF # 4 PB 2 3 Potatoes// white unspecified 31 Canned: NFS 0. 0119 RDF # 4 PB 2 3 Potatoes/ white whole 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 2 potato PDP 0.0119 RDF # 4 NB 2 3 31 Canned: NFS 0. 0119 RDF # 4 PB 2 3 Radishes 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 2 garden beets FT 0.024 RDF #5 PB 1 3 2 Radish, Chinese 12 Cooked: NFS Radishes oriental 2 garden beets FT 0.024 RDF #5 NB 1 3 2 Rutabagas Rutabagas roots 2 turnips FT 0.121 RDF # 6 NB 1 3 2 Salsify (roots) Salsify( oyster plant) 2 carrot PDP 0. 0116 RDF #3 NB 1 3 2 Sugar Beets (inc. molasses 98 Refined 0.5 sugar beets FT 0.01 0.0004 B 2 4 Sweet potatoes 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 0.2 sweet potato PDP 0. 0065 RDF #7 NB 18 41 32 Canned: Cooked 34 Canned: Boiled sweet potato PDP 0. 0065 RDF #7 PB 18 41 Turnips, roots 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 2 turnips FT 0.121 RDF # 6 NB 1 3 2 Crop Group 2: Leaves of Root and Tuber Vegetables Beets, garden (tops) 11 Uncooked 14 Boiled 75 garden beets FT 10.14 RDF #8 PB 17 27 Radish  Tops Radishes tops 75 garden beets FT 10.14 RDF #9 PB 1 3 2 Rutabaga  Tops 12 Cooked: NFS 75 Turnip tops FT 15.3 RDF #10 PB 1 3 2 Turnips, tops 14 Boiled 32 Canned: Cooked 44 Frozen: Boiled 75 turnip tops FT 15.3 RDF #10 PB 1 3 2 Crop Group 4: Leafy Vegetables (except Brassica Vegetables)

Celery 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 3 Celery PDP 0. 0152 RDF # 11 NB 3 6 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max 19 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 3 Celery PDP 0. 0152 RDF # 11 PB 3 6 Celery Juice 31 Canned: NFS 3 Celery PDP 0. 0152 RDF # 11 PB 3 6 Dandelions 11 Uncooked 22 Spinach PDP 0. 0082 RDF # 12 PB 1 3 2 Endive (escarole) 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 10 Leaf Lettuce FDA 0.001 RDF # 15 PB 1 3 2 Lettuce  head 11 Uncooked 10 Lettuce PDP 0. 0169 RDF #14 NB 3 8 Lettuce  leaf 11 Uncooked 10 Leaf Lettuce FDA 0. 001 RDF # 15 PB 1 3 2 Lettuce (unspecified) 31 Canned: NFS 10 Lettuce  PDP 0. 0169 RDF #14 PB 3 8 Parsley 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 33 Canned: Baked 34 Canned: Boiled 22 Spinach PDP 0. 0082 RDF # 12 PB 1 3 2 Rhubarb 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 3 Celery PDP 0. 015 RDF #16 NB 1 3 2 43 Frozen: Baked 3 Celery PDP 0. 015 RDF #16 PB 1 3 2 Spinach 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 44 Frozen: Boiled 22 Spinach PDP 0. 0082 RDF # 12 PB 1 3 2 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 34 Canned: Boiled 22 Canned Spinach PDP 0. 006 RDF #13 PB 1 3 2 Swiss chard 11 Uncooked 14 Boiled 3 Celery PDP 0. 015 RDF # 16 NB 1 3 2 Crop Group 5: Brassica Leafy vegetables Broccoli 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 10 Broccoli PDP 0. 013 RDF #17 NB 4 9 32 Canned: Cooked 42 Frozen: Cooked 44 Frozen: Boiled 10 Broccoli PDP 0. 013 RDF # 17 PB 4 9 Brussels Sprouts 14 Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 10 Cabbage FDA 0. 001 RDF #18 PB 33 67 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max 20 Cabbage 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 21 Cabbage FDA 0. 001 RDF # 19 NB 2 4 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 51 Cured: NFS (smoked/ pickled/ 21 Cabbage FDA 0. 001 RDF # 19 PB 2 4 Cauliflower 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 15 Fried 10 Broccoli PDP 0. 013 RDF # 20 NB 2 4 42 Frozen: Cooked 10 Broccoli PDP 0. 012 RDF #20 PB 2 4 Collards 42 Frozen: Cooked 10 Mustard FT 2.78 RDF # 21 PB 4 10 Kale 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 32 Canned: Cooked 10 Mustard FT 2.78 RDF # 22 PB 1 3 2 Kohlrabi 14 Boiled 10 Cabbage FDA 0. 001 RDF # 23 NB 1 3 2 Mustard greens 14 Boiled 10 Mustard FT 2.78 RDF # 22 PB 1 3 2 Crop Group 6: Legume Vegetables (Succulent or Dried)

Beans dry black eyed peas/ cowpea 14 Boiled 1 Dried Beans FT 0.067 0.002 B 1 3 Beans dry broadbeans 14 Boiled 1 Dried Beans FT 0.067 0.002 B 1 3 Beans dry garbanzo/ chick pea 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 15 Fried 32 Canned: Cooked 1 Dried Beans FT 0.067 0.002 B 1 3 Beans dry great northern 32 Canned: Cooked 1 Dried Beans FT 0.067 0.002 B 1 3 Beans dry hyacinth 1 Dried Beans FT 0.067 0.002 B 1 3 Beans dry kidney 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 32 Canned: Cooked 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 1 Dried Beans FT 0.067 0.002 B 1 3 Beans dry lima 14 Boiled 32 Canned: Cooked 1 Dried Beans FT 0.067 0.002 B 1 3 Beans dry navy (pea) 32 Canned: Cooked 34 Canned: Boiled 1 Dried Beans FT 0.067 0.002 B 1 3 Beans dry other 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 34 Canned: Boiled 1 Dried Beans FT 0.067 0.002 B 1 3 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max 21 Beans dry pigeon beans 1 Dried Beans FT 0.067 0.002 B 1 3 Beans dry pinto 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 32 Canned: Cooked 42 Frozen: Cooked 1 Dried Beans FT 0.067 0.002 B 1 3 Beans broadbeans 10 Succulent Beans PDP .0.023 RDF # 24 PB 14 21 Beans succulent green 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 10 Succulent Beans PDP .0.023 RDF # 24 PB 14 21 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 44 Frozen: Boiled 51 Cured: NFS (smoked/ pickled/ 10 Processed Succulent Beans PDP 0.012 RDF #25 PB 10 16 Beans succulent hyacinth 10 Succulent Beans PDP 0. 023 RDF # 24 PB 14 21 Beans succulent lima 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 32 Canned: Cooked 42 Frozen: Cooked 44 Frozen: Boiled 10 Processed Succulent Beans PDP 0.012 RDF #26 PB 13 30 Beans succulent other 34 Canned: Boiled 10 Processed Succulent Beans PDP 0.012 RDF #25 PB 10 16 Beans yellow/ wax 14 Boiled 10 Succulent Beans PDP 0. 023 RDF # 24 PB 14 21 32 Canned: Cooked 42 Frozen: Cooked 10 Processed Succulent Beans PDP 0.012 RDF #25 PB 10 16 Beans unspecified 10 Succulent Beans PDP 0. 0.023 RDF # 24 PB 14 21 Lentils 14 Boiled 1 Dried Beans FT 0.067 0.002 B 1 3 Mung Bean (SPROUTS) 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 15 Fried 1 Dried Beans FT 0.067 0.002 B 1 3 Peas succulent/ black eyed/ cowpea 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 10 Peas  FDA 0. 13 RDF # 27 PB 2 7 32 Canned: Cooked 42 Frozen: Cooked 10 Peas  PDP 0. 0127 RDF # 28 PB 1 5 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max 22 Peas (garden) green 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 10 Peas  FDA 0. 13 RDF # 27 PB 2 7 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 44 Frozen: Boiled 45 Frozen: Fried 10 Peas  PDP 0. 0127 RDF # 28 PB 1 5 Snowpeas 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 15 Fried 10 Peas FDA 0. 13 RDF #27 PB 1 5 42 Frozen: Cooked 10 Peas PDP 0. 0127 RDF # 28 PB Peas (garden) dry 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 34 Canned: Boiled 1 Dry Peas  FT 0.146 0.013 B 3 9 Soybeans other 0. 5 Soybeans  PDP 0.0015 0.000015 B 1 1 Soybeans flour (defatted) 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 31 Canned: NFS 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 98 Refined 0.5 Soybeans  PDP 0. 0015 0.000015 B 1 1 Soybeans flour (full fat) 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 0.5 Soybeans  PDP 0. 0015 0.000015 B 1 1 Soybeans flour (low fat) 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 15 Fried 31 Canned: NFS 0.5 Soybeans  PDP 0. 0015 0.000015 B 1 1 Soybeans mature seeds dry 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 41 Frozen: NFS 0.5 Soybeans  PDP 0. 0015 0.000015 B 1 1 Soybeans oil 98 Refined 0.5 Soybeans  PDP 0. 0015 0.000015 B 1 1 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max 23 Soybeans protein isolate 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 33 Canned: Baked 34 Canned: Boiled 41 Frozen: NFS 42 Frozen: Cooked 51 Cured: NFS (smoked/ pickled/ 0.5 Soybeans  PDP 0. 0015 0.000015 B 1 1 Soybeans sprouted seeds 14 Boiled 0.5 Soybeans  PDP 0. 0015 0.000015 B 1 1 Crop Group 8: Fruiting Vegetables (except Cucurbits) Group Eggplants 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 5 Sweet pepper FDA 0.005 RDF # 29 NB 9 21 Peppers chilli incl jalapeno 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 5 Hot Pepper  FDA 0. 108 RDF # 30 NB 1 3 2 Peppers chilli incl jalapeno 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 33 Canned: Baked 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 51 Cured: NFS (smoked/ pickled/ 52 Cured: Cooked( smokd/ pickld/ 60 Canned: Cured 5 Hot Pepper  FDA 0. 108 RDF # 30 PB 1 3 2 Peppers sweet( garden) 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 5 Sweet Pepper  FDA 0. 02 RDF # 31 NB 13 30 Peppers sweet( garden) 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 51 Cured: NFS (smoked/ pickled/ 5 Sweet Pepper  FDA 0. 02 RDF # 31 PB 13 30 Peppers  Other 11 Uncooked 5 Hot Pepper  FDA 0. 108 RDF # 30 NB 1 3 2 Pimiento 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 5 Hot Pepper  FDA 0. 108 RDF # 30 NB 1 3 2 31 Canned: NFS 60 Canned: Cured 5 Hot Pepper  FDA 0. 108 RDF # 30 NB 1 3 2 Paprika 12 Cooked: NFS 5 Hot Pepper  FDA 0. 108 RDF # 30 NB 1 3 2 Tomato Catsup 34 Canned: Boiled 5 Tomato PDP 0. 0044 RDF # 32 PB 15 27 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max 24 Tomatoes dried 12 Cooked: NFS 15 Fried 5 Tomato PDP 0. 0044 RDF # 32 PB 15 27 Tomatoes juice 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 5 Tomato PDP 0. 0044 RDF # 32 PB 15 27 Tomatoes paste 14 Boiled 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 33 Canned: Baked 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 5 Tomato PDP 0. 0044 RDF # 32 PB 15 27 Tomatoes puree 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 33 Canned: Baked 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 5 Tomato PDP 0. 0044 RDF # 32 PB 15 27 Tomatoes whole 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 5 Tomato PDP 0. 0044 RDF # 33 NB 5 11 Tomatoes whole 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 33 Canned: Baked 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 5 Tomato PDP 0. 0044 RDF # 32 PB 15 27 Crop Group 9: Cucurbit Vegetables Cucumbers 11 Uncooked 3 Cucumbers FDA 0. 0033 RDF # 34 NB 14 32 34 Canned: Boiled 60 Canned: Cured 3 Cucumbers FDA 0.0033 RDF #34 PB 14 32 Bitter melon 12 Cooked: NFS 3 Cantaloupe  PDP 0. 0056 RDF #35 NB 1 3 2 Melons cantaloupes juice 3 Cantaloupe  PDP 0. 0056 RDF # 36 PB 7 9 Melons cantaloupes pulp 11 Uncooked 3 Cantaloupe  PDP 0. 0056 RDF # 36 NB 7 9 Melons  Casaba 11 Uncooked 3 Cantaloupe  PDP 0. 0056 RDF # 35 NB 1 2a Melons  Crenshaw 3 Cantaloupe  PDP 0. 0056 RDF # 35 NB 1 2a Melons honeydew 11 Uncooked 3 Cantaloupe  PDP 0. 0056 RDF # 37 NB 19 44 Melons persian 3 Cantaloupe  PDP 0. 0056 RDF #35 NB 1 3 2 Watermelon 11 Uncooked 3 Watermelon  FDA 0. 0019 RDF #38 NB 13 15 Watermelon juice 3 Watermelon  FDA 0. 0019 RDF #38 PB 13 15 Wintermelon 14 Boiled 3 Cantaloupe  PDP 0. 0056 RDF #35 NB 1 3 2 Casabas 11 Uncooked 3 Cantaloupe  PDP 0. 0056 RDF #35 NB 1 3 2 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max 25 Pumpkins 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 3 Winter Squash PDP 0. 006 RDF # 39 NB 31 56 33 Canned: Baked 34 Canned: Boiled 3 Winter Squash PDP 0. 006 RDF # 39 PB 31 56 Squash, winter (includes spaghetti squash) 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 3 Winter Squash  PDP 0. 006 RDF # 40 NB 11 27 Squash, summer 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 3 Summer Squash FDA 0. 016 RDF # 41 NB 11 27 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 51 Cured: NFS (smoked/ pickled/ 3 Summer Squash FDA 0. 016 RDF # 41 PB 11 27 Crop Group 10: Citrus Fruits Citrus citron 13 Baked 14 Boiled 10 Orange  PDP 0. 013 RDF #42 PB 1 3 2 Grapefruit peel 10 Orange  PDP 0. 013 RDF #42 PB 4 6 Grapefruit juice 11 Uncooked 31 Canned: NFS 10 Orange juice  PDP 0. 006 RDF #43 PB 4 6 Grapefruit juice concentrate 41 Frozen: NFS 10 Orange juice  PDP 0. 006 RDF #43 PB 4 6 Grapefruit peeled fruit 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 10 Orange  PDP Decomposited 0.013 RDF #45 NB 4 6 Grapefruit peeled fruit 31 Canned: NFS 10 Orange  PDP 0. 006 RDF #42 PB 4 6 Kumquats 10 Orange  PDP 0. 013 RDF #42 PB 1 3 2 Lemons juice 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 34 Canned: Boiled 41 Frozen: NFS 42 Frozen: Cooked 10 Orange juice  PDP 0. 006 RDF #44 PB 3 7 Lemons juice concentrate 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 31 Canned: NFS 34 Canned: Boiled 41 Frozen: NFS 10 Orange juice PDP 0. 006 RDF #44 PB 3 7 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max 26 Lemons peel 11 Uncooked 13 Baked 14 Boiled 31 Canned: NFS 34 Canned: Boiled 41 Frozen: NFS 10 Orange  PDP 0. 013 RDF #42 PB 3 7 Lemons peeled fruit 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 10 Orange  PDP Decomposited 0.013 RDF #45 NB 3 7 Lemons peeled fruit 31 Canned: NFS 10 Orange  PDP 0. 013 RDF #42 PB 3 7 Limes juice 11 Uncooked 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 34 Canned: Boiled 41 Frozen: NFS 10 Orange juice  PDP 0. 006 RDF #46 PB 1 3 2 Limes juice concentrate 12 Cooked: NFS 41 Frozen: NFS 10 Orange juice  PDP 0. 006 RDF #46 PB 1 3 2 Limes peel 13 Baked 14 Boiled 10 Orange  PDP 0. 013 RDF #42 PB 1 3 2 Limes peeled fruit 11 Uncooked 10 Orange  PDP Decomposited 0.013 RDF #45 NB 1 3 2 Oranges juice 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 31 Canned: NFS 41 Frozen: NFS 10 Orange juice PDP 0. 006 RDF #47 PB 3 5 Oranges juice concentrate 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 31 Canned: NFS 41 Frozen: NFS 42 Frozen: Cooked 10 Orange juice  PDP 0. 006 RDF #47 PB 3 5 Oranges peel 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 31 Canned: NFS 41 Frozen: NFS 10 Orange  PDP 0. 013 RDF #42 PB 3 5 Oranges peeled fruit 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 10 Orange  PDP Decomposited 0.013 RDF #45 NB 3 5 Oranges peeled fruit 31 Canned: NFS 10 Orange  PDP 0. 013 RDF #42 PB 3 5 Tangelos 10 Orange  PDP Decomposited 0.013 RDF #45 NB 1 3 2 Tangerine 11 Uncooked 10 Orange  PDP Decomposited 0.013 RDF #45 NB 1 3 2 31 Canned: NFS 41 Frozen: NFS 10 Orange  PDP 0. 013 RDF #42 PB 1 3 2 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max 27 Tangerines juice 11 Uncooked 31 Canned: NFS 41 Frozen: NFS 10 Orange juice  PDP 0. 006 RDF #46 PB 1 3 2 Tangerines juiceconcentrate 10 Orange juice PDP 0. 006 RDF #46 PB 1 3 2 Crop Group 11: Pome Fruits Group Apples 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 12 Apple PDP Decomposited 0.03 RDF # 48 NB 23 31 18 Dried 12 Apple PDP 0. 03 0. 009 B 23 31 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 33 Canned: Baked 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 12 Apple PDP 0. 03 RDF #49 PB 23 31 Apples dried 13 Baked 14 Boiled 18 Dried 42 Frozen: Cooked 12 Apple PDP 0. 03 RDF #49 PB 23 31 Apples juice/ cider 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 31 Canned: NFS 41 Frozen: NFS 12 Apple juice PDP 0. 010 RDF #50 PB 23 31 Apples juice concentrate 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 31 Canned: NFS 41 Frozen: NFS 12 Apple juice PDP 0. 010 RDF #50 PB 23 31 Pears 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 12 Pear PDP Decomposite 0.0098 RDF #51 NB 3 6 31 Canned: NFS 12 Pear PDP 0. 0098 RDF #52 PB 3 6 Pears dried 13 Baked 14 Boiled 18 Dried 12 Pear PDP 0. 0098 RDF #52 PB 3 6 Pears juice 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 31 Canned: NFS 33 Canned: Baked 41 Frozen: NFS 42 Frozen: Cooked 12 Pear PDP 0. 0098 RDF #52 PB 3 6 Quinces 12 Pear PDP 0. 0098 RDF #53 NB 1 3 2 Loquat 12 Pear PDP 0. 0098 RDF #53 NB 1 3 2 Crabapples 31 Canned: NFS 12 Apple PDP 0. 033 RDF #54 PB 1 3 2 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max 28 Crop Group 12: Stone Fruits Group Apricot juice 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 31 Canned: NFS 42 Frozen: Cooked 10 Peaches PDP 0. 07 RDF # 55 PB 1 3 2 Apricots 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 10 Peaches PDP 0. 07 RDF # 56 NB 1 3 2 31 Canned: NFS 34 Canned: Boiled 10 Peaches PDP 0. 07 RDF # 55 PB 1 3 2 Apricots dried 13 Baked 14 Boiled 18 Dried 10 Peaches PDP 0. 07 RDF # 55 PB 1 3 2 Cherries 11 Uncooked 10 Cherries FDA 0. 127 RDF #57 PB 25 36 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 31 Canned: NFS 33 Canned: Baked 41 Frozen: NFS 10 Cherries FDA 0. 127 RDF #58 PB 12 24 Cherries dried 10 Cherries FDA 0. 127 RDF #57 PB 25 36 Cherries juice 13 Baked 14 Boiled 31 Canned: NFS 41 Frozen: NFS 10 Cherries FDA 0. 127 RDF #58 PB 12 24 Nectarines 11 Uncooked 10 Peaches PDP 0. 07 RDF #59 NB 12 24 Peaches 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 10 Peaches PDP 0. 07 RDF #60 NB 15 18 31 Canned: NFS 41 Frozen: NFS 10 Peaches PDP 0. 07 RDF #61 PB 15 18 Peaches dried 14 Boiled 18 Dried 10 Peaches PDP 0. 07 RDF #61 PB 15 18 Peaches juice 11 Uncooked 31 Canned: NFS 10 Peaches PDP 0. 07 RDF #61 PB 15 18 Plums (damsons) 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 10 Peaches PDP 0. 07 RDF # 96 NB 5 9 31 Canned: NFS 42 Frozen: Cooked 51 Cured: NFS (smoked/ pickled/ 10 Peaches PDP 0. 07 RDF # 62 PB 5 9 Plums/ prune juice 11 Uncooked 31 Canned: NFS 10 Peaches PDP 0. 07 RDF # 62 PB 5 9 Plums prunes (dried) 13 Baked 14 Boiled 18 Dried 31 Canned: NFS 10 Peaches PDP 0. 07 RDF # 62 PB 5 9 Crop Group 13: Berries Group Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max 29 Blackberries 11 Uncooked 13 Baked 14 Boiled 31 Canned: NFS 34 Canned: Boiled 41 Frozen: NFS 12 Raspberry FDA 0. 09 RDF # 63 PB 28 44 Blackberries juice 11 Uncooked 31 Canned: NFS 12 Raspberry FDA 0. 09 RDF #63 PB 28 44 Blueberries 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 31 Canned: NFS 41 Frozen: NFS 3 Blueberry FDA 0. 09 RDF # 64 PB 22 45 Boysenberries 31 Canned: NFS 34 Canned: Boiled 41 Frozen: NFS 12 Raspberry FDA 0. 09 RDF #65 PB 1 3 2 Currant 11 Uncooked 3 Blueberry FDA 0. 09 RDF #66 PB 1 3 2 Dewberries Dewberries 12 Raspberry FDA 0. 09 RDF #65 PB 1 3 2 Elderberry Elderberries 3 Blueberry FDA 0. 09 RDF #66 PB 1 3 2 Gooseberry Gooseberries 3 Blueberry FDA 0. 09 RDF #66 PB 1 3 2 Huckleberry Huckleberries 3 Blueberry FDA 0. 09 RDF #66 PB 1 3 2 Loganberries Loganberries 12 Raspberry FDA 0. 09 RDF #65 PB 1 3 2 Raspberries 11 Uncooked 13 Baked 14 Boiled 31 Canned: NFS 34 Canned: Boiled 41 Frozen: NFS 12 Raspberry FDA 0. 09 RDF #67 PB 4 10 Youngberries 12 Raspberry FDA 0. 09 RDF #65 PB 1 3 2 Crop Group 14: Tree Nuts Almonds 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 18 Dried 41 Frozen: NFS 0.1 Almond FT 0.059 RDF #68 PB 2 4 Chestnuts 14 Boiled 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 0.1 Almond FT 0.059 RDF #69 PB 1 3 2 Filberts (hazelnuts) 11 Uncooked 13 Baked 14 Boiled 0.1 Pecan FT 0.022 RDF #70 PB 4 12 Pecans 11 Uncooked 13 Baked 14 Boiled 0.1 Pecan FT 0.022 RDF #71 PB 20 24 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max 30 Walnuts 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 1.0 Walnut FT 0.27 RDF #72 PB 1 2 Walnut oil 1. 0 Walnut FT 0.27 0.0054 B 1 2 Crop Group 15: Cereal Grains Corn, fresh (including sweet) K + CWHR 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 0.1 Corn PDP 0. 0085 RDF # 73 NB 1 1 32 Canned: Cooked 34 Canned: Boiled 35 Canned: Fried 42 Frozen: Cooked 0.1 Corn PDP 0. 0085 RDF # 73 PB 1 1 Corn grain endosperm 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 33 Canned: Baked 34 Canned: Boiled 41 Frozen: NFS 42 Frozen: Cooked 43 Frozen: Baked 45 Frozen: Fried 99 Alcohol/ Fermented/ Distilled 0.02 Corn FT 0.01 0.0001 B 11 Corn grain oil 98 Refined 0.02 Corn FT 0.01 0.0001 B 11 Corn grain bran 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 31 Canned: NFS 0.02 Corn FT 0.01 0.0001 B 11 Corn grain/ sugar molasses 12 Cooked: NFS 41 Frozen: NFS 0.02 Corn FT 0.01 0.0001 B 11 Corn grain/ sugar/ hfcs 98 Refined 0.02 Corn FT 0.01 0.0001 B 11 Corn, popcorn 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 0.02 Corn FT 0.01 0.0001 B 11 Millet, proso, grain 13 Baked 1 Wheat PDP 0. 0015 0.000015 B 1 1 Rice milled (white) 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 34 Canned: Boiled 42 Frozen: Cooked 99 Alcohol/ Fermented/ Distilled 15 Rice FT 7.4 0. 074 B 1 1 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max 31 Rice bran 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 15 Fried 31 Canned: NFS 15 Rice FT 7.4 0. 074 B 1 1 Rice rough (brown) 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 99 Alcohol/ Fermented/ Distilled 15 Rice FT 7.4 0. 074 B 1 1 Sorghum, grain 14 Boiled 10 Wheat PDP 0. 0015 0.000015 B 1 1 Wheat flour 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked 33 Canned: Baked 34 Canned: Boiled 41 Frozen: NFS 42 Frozen: Cooked 43 Frozen: Baked 45 Frozen: Fried 52 Cured: Cooked( smokd/ pickld/ 1 Wheat PDP 0. 0015 0.000015 B 1 1 Wheat bran 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 1 Wheat PDP 0. 0015 0.000015 B 1 1 Wheat germ 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 1 Wheat PDP 0. 0015 0.000015 B 1 1 Wheat germ oil 13 Baked 1 Wheat PDP 0. 0015 0.000015 B 1 1 Wheat rough 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 1 Wheat PDP 0. 0015 0.000015 B 1 1 Crop Group 19: Herbs ans Spices Dill (fresh) 13 Baked 14 Boiled 0.2 Tolerance 0.2 0. 004 B 1 3 2 Miscellaneous Commodities Asparagus 11 Uncooked 14 Boiled 15 Asparagus FDA 0. 0032 RDF # 74 NB 43 87 32 Canned: Cooked 42 Frozen: Cooked 15 Asparagus FDA 0. 0032 RDF # 74 PB 43 87 Bananas Imports only 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried TBD Bananas  PDP 0. 01 RDF # 75 NB 100 100 31 Canned: NFS 32 Canned: Cooked TBD Bananas  PDP 0. 01 RDF # 75 PB 100 100 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max 32 Bananas dried 13 Baked 15 Fried 18 Dried 32 Canned: Cooked TBD Bananas  PDP 0. 01 RDF # 75 PB 100 100 Bananas juice 11 Uncooked 31 Canned: NFS TBD Bananas  PDP 0. 01 RDF # 75 PB 100 100 Plantains dried TBD Bananas  PDP 0. 01 RDF # 75 PB 100 100 Plantains green 15 Fried TBD Bananas  PDP 0. 01 RDF # 75 NB 100 100 Plantains ripe 11 Uncooked 14 Boiled 15 Fried TBD Bananas  PDP 0. 01 RDF # 75 NB 100 100 Cranberries 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 18 Dried 31 Canned: NFS 42 Frozen: Cooked 3 Cranberries FDA 0.001 RDF # 76 PB 39 84 Cranberries juice 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 31 Canned: NFS 3 Cranberries FDA 0. 001 RDF # 76 PB 39 84 Cranberries concentrate 31 Canned: NFS 3 Cranberries FDA 0. 001 RDF #76 PB 39 84 Flax, seed Refined 0. 5 Flax seed FT 0.01 0.0001 B 1 1 Grapes 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 31 Canned: NFS 41 Frozen: NFS 10 Grapes PDP 0. 016 RDF # 77 PB 8 12 Grapes juice 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 31 Canned: NFS 34 Canned: Boiled 41 Frozen: NFS 10 Grapes juice PDP 0. 010 RDF # 78 PB 8 12 Grapes juice concentrate 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 31 Canned: NFS 41 Frozen: NFS 10 Grapes juice PDP 0. 010 RDF # 78 PB 8 12 Grapes leaves 14 Boiled 10 Grapes PDP 0. 016 RDF # 77 PB 8 12 Grapes raisins 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 18 Dried 42 Frozen: Cooked 10 Grapes PDP 0. 016 RDF # 77 PB 8 12 Grapes wine and sherry 99 Alcohol/ Fermented/ Distilled 10 Grapes PDP 0. 016 RDF # 77 PB 8 12 Okra 12 Cooked: NFS 14 Boiled 15 Fried 4 Okra FT 1.0 RDF # 79 NB 32 94 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max 33 32 Canned: Cooked 42 Frozen: Cooked 44 Frozen: Boiled 4 Oka FT 1.0 RDF #79 PB 32 94 Olives 60 Canned: Cured 10 Olive FT 3.85 RDF # 80 PB 1 3 2 Olive oil 98 Refined 10 Olive FT 3.85 0.077 B 1 3 2 Peanuts butter 13 Baked 14 Boiled 0.05 Peanuts FT 0.01 0.0006 B 3 6 Peanuts hulled 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 15 Fried 41 Frozen: NFS 0.05 Peanuts FT 0.01 0.0006 B 3 6 Peanuts oil 98 Refined 0.05 Peanuts FT 0.01 0.0006 B 3 6 Pineapples dried Imports only 18 Dried TBD Pineapple FDA 0. 053 RDF # 82 RDF # 95 RDF #97 PB 1 3 2 Pineapples juice Imports only 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 31 Canned: NFS 42 Frozen: Cooked TBD Pineapple FDA 0. 053 RDF # 82 RDF # 95 RDF #97 PB 1 3 2 Pineapples juice concentrate Imports only 12 Cooked: NFS 31 Canned: NFS 33 Canned: Baked 41 Frozen: NFS TBD Pineapple FDA 0. 053 RDF # 82 RDF # 95 RDF #97 PB 1 3 2 Pineapples peeled fruit Imports only 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled TBD Pineapple FDA 0. 053 RDF # 81 RDF # 95 RDF #97 NB 1 3 2 Pineapples peeled fruit Imports only 31 Canned: NFS 33 Canned: Baked 41 Frozen: NFS TBD Pineapple FDA 0. 053 RDF # 82 RDF # 95 RDF #97 PB 1 3 2 Pistachio nuts 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 0.1 Pistachio FT 0.03 RDF # 83 PB 17 38 Prickly pear cactus, pads Cactus pads (nopal) 12 not in DEEM Prickly pear cactus, fruit 5 not in DEEM Strawberries 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 31 Canned: NFS 34 Canned: Boiled 41 Frozen: NFS 4 Strawberry FDA 0. 0638 RDF # 84 PB 16 24 Strawberries juice 11 Uncooked 12 Cooked: NFS 13 Baked 14 Boiled 31 Canned: NFS 4 Strawberry FDA 0. 0638 RDF # 84 PB 16 24 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files Commodity DEEM Food Form Reassessed Tolerance, ppm 1 Data Source 2 Anticipated Residue (ppm) or RDF # Blended Classification % CT Chronic Acute Avg Max Sunflower oil 98 Refined 0.5 Sunflower FT 0. 042 0.0004 B 1 1 Sunflower seeds 11 Uncooked 13 Baked 0.5 Sunflower  FT 0.042 RDF # 85 PB 1 1 Fish Oysters 2 Tolerance

1. See Carbaryl Product and Residue Chemistry Chapters for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision. DP Barcode: D238151. 2. PDP = USDA Pesticide Data Program; FDA = FDA Surveillance Program Data; FT = field trial data; P = processing. 3. Reported in the QUA as "Other Crops" Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files 35 Table 1b: Summary of Market Basket Survey Data Commodity DEEM Food Form Market Basket Survey Commodity Used RDF # %CT Likely Max Citrus Fruit Citrus citron All food forms Orange RDF #100 2 Grapefruit All food forms except juice RDF #101 6 Kumquats All food forms RDF #100 2 Lemons All food forms except juice RDF #103 7 Limes All food forms except juice RDF #100 2 Oranges All food forms except juice RDF #45 5 Tangelos All food forms RDF #100 2 Tangerine All food forms except juice RDF #100 2 Pome Fruit Apples All food forms except juice and apples, dried Apple RDF # 48 31 18 Dried RDF # 108 31 Pear All food forms RDF #105 6 Quinces All food forms RDF #107 2 Loquat All food forms RDF #107 2 Crabapples All food forms RDF #107 2 Stone Fruits Apricot All food forms Peach RDF # 98 2 Nectarines All food forms RDF #104 24 Peaches All food forms RDF #60 18 Plums (damsons) All food forms RDF # 106 9 Brassica Vegetables Broccoli All food forms Broccoli RDF #17 9 Cauliflower All food forms RDF # 99 4 Leafy Vegetables Lettuce  head 11 Uncooked Lettuce RDF #14 8 Lettuce  leaf 11 Uncooked RDF #102 2 Lettuce (unspecified) 31 Canned: NFS RDF #102 8 Fruiting Vegetables Tomato All food forms Tomato RDF # 33 27 Miscellaneous Crops Bananas All food forms Bananas RDF # 75 100 Plantains All food forms RDF # 75 100 Grapes All food forms except juice Grapes RDF # 77 12 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files 36 Table 2. Residue Distribution Files Garden Beets (roots) Field Trial data 24 samples RDF #1 Garden Beets (roots) 27% CT Totalz= 65 Totalnz= 24 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03 Sugarbeet (roots) Blended Field trial data Information from 12/ 2/ 93 AR memo (S. Hummel, D193129, 12/ 3/ 93) 4% CT Average Residue = 0.01 ppm Acute AR = 0.0004 Carrots  PDP 1994  1996 1888 samples/ 0 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.0116 ppm RDF #2 Carrots PDP 1994 96 6% CT Totalz= 94 Totalnz= 6 0.0116 0.0116 0.0116 0.0116 0.0116 0.0116 Chicory, Horseradish, Parsnip, Salsify (Carrots  PDP) 1994  1996 1888 samples/ 0 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.0116 ppm RDF #3 Chic, Horse, Parsnip, Salsify (Carrots PDP) 1994 96 2% CT Totalz= 98 Totalnz= 2 0.0116 0.0116 Chronic AR = 0.024 ppm Chronic AR = 0.01 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0116 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0116 ppm Potatoes  PDP 1994 1995 1401 samples/ 0 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.0119 ppm RDF #4 Potatoes PDP 1994 95 3% CT Totalz= 97 Totalnz= 3 0.0119 0.0119 0.0119 For dried potatoes (blended)  acute AR = 0.00036 Radishes (Garden Beets (roots) Field Trial data 24 samples RDF #5 Radishes (Garden Beets (roots)) 2% CT Totalz= 1176 Totalnz= 24 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03 Turnips translate to rutabagas Field Trial Data 27 samples RDF #6 Turnips (roots) 2% CT Totalz= 1323 Totalnz= 27 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.07 0.11 0.13 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.72 0.93 1.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Sweet Potato  PDP 1559 samples/ 3 detects 1996 1998 1/ 2 LOD = 0.011 ppm RDF #7 Sweet potatoes  PDP  96 98 41 % CT Totalz = 1512 Totalnz = 3 44, 0.0059 0.67 0.01 0.29 Chronic AR = 0.0119 ppm Chronic AR = 0.024 ppm Chronic AR =0.121 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0065 ppm Garden Beet Tops Field Trial Data 24 Samples RDF #8 Garden beet tops 27% CT Totalz= 63 Totalnz= 24 3.96 4.27 4.49 14.48 18.28 21.18 8.45 8.46 9.84 25.47 28.36 42.23 3.19 3.9 3. 91 2.41 2.71 4.65 1.63 1.77 1.9 8.64 9.2 10 Radish Tops (Garden beet tops) Field trial data. 24 samples RDF #9 Radish tops (Garden beet tops  FT) 2% CT Totalz= 1176 Totalnz= 24 3.96 4.27 4.49 14.48 18.28 21.18 8.45 8.46 9.84 25.47 28.36 42.23 3.19 3.9 3. 91 2. 41 2.71 4.65 1.63 1.77 1.9 8. 64 9. 2 10 Turnip tops Field Trial data 33 samples RDF #10 Turnip Tops 2% CT Totalz= 1617 Totalnz= 33 6.84 8.19 10.33 51.19 67.8 70.24 5.4 5. 41 5.88 6.91 9.04 9.73 49.12 49.24 50.27 1.07 1.09 1.49 10.97 11.35 14.5 7.69 9.25 11.71 1.56 1.83 1.84 5.28 5.76 6.83 2.07 2.13 3.68 Celery PDP 1994 176 samples/ 0 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.0152 ppm RDF #11 Celery  PDP 1994 6% CT Totalz= 94 Totalnz= 6 0.0152 0.0152 0.0152 0.0152 0.0152 0.0152 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files 37 Chronic AR = 10.14 ppm Chronic AR = 10.14 ppm Chronic AR = 15.3 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0152 ppm Spinach  PDP data Translated to Dandelions and Parsley 1995 1997 1639 samples/ 10 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.006 ppm RDF # 12 Spinach PDP 2% CT Totalz= 1767 Totalnz= 10 25, 0.008 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.068 0.11 0.02 0.02 0.077 0.039 Canned Spinach  PDP 1997 1998 863 samples/ no detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.006 ppm RDF #13 Canned Spinach 2% CT Totalz= 98 Totalnz= 2 0.006 0.006 Head Lettuce  PDP 1994 691 samples/ no detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.0169 ppm RDF #14 Lettuce  Head 8% CT = Totalz= 92 Totalnz= 8 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 Leaf Lettuce  FDA translate to Endive 1992 1998 241 samples/ no detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF #15 Leaf Lettuce 2% CT Totalz= 98 Totalnz= 2 0.001 0.001 Chronic AR = 0.0082 ppm Chronic AR = 0.006 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0169 ppm Chronic AR = 0.001 ppm Rhubarb/ Swiss Chard (Celery PDP 1994) 176 samples/ 0 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.0152 ppm RDF #16 Rhubarb (Celery  PDP 1994) 2% CT Totalz= 98 Totalnz= 2 0.0152 0.0152 Broccoli  PDP 1994 679 samples/ 1 detect 1/ 2 LOD = 0.0125 ppm RDF # 17 Broccoli  PDP 1994 9% CT Totalz= 618 Totalnz= 1 60, 0.013 0.007 Brussels sprouts (Cabbage  FDA 1992  1998) 246 samples/ 0 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF # 18 Brussels sprouts (Cabbage  FDA 92 98) 67% CT Totalz = 33 TotalFreq = 1 67, 0.001 Cabbage  FDA 1992  1998 246 samples/ 0 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF # 19 Cabbage  FDA 92 98 4% CT Totalz= 96 TotalFreq = 1 4, 0.001 Chronic AR = 0.015 ppm Chronic AR = 0.013 ppm Chronic AR = 0.001 ppm Chronic AR = 0.001 ppm Cauliflower (Broccoli  PDP 1994) 679 samples/ 1 detect 1/ 2 LOD = 0.0125 ppm RDF # 20 Cauliflower (Broccoli  PDP 1994) 4% CT Totalz= 652 Totalnz= 1 26, 0.013 0.007 Collards Mustards FT data 24 samples RDF # 21 Collards (Mustards FT) 10% CT Totalz= 216 Totalnz= 24 0.65 0.72 0.99 1.8 2.31 2.68 3.47 3.63 3.8 2.57 2.79 2.99 0.3 0. 42 0. 95 1.83 3.38 4.71 4.93 7.76 8.29 0.99 1.61 3.23 Mustards, Rape, Kale Mustards FT data 24 samples RDF # 22 Mustards  FT 2% CT Totalz= 1176 Totalnz= 24 0.65 0.72 0.99 1.8 2.31 2.68 3.47 3.63 3.8 2.57 2.79 2.99 0.3 0. 42 0. 95 1.83 3.38 4.71 4.93 7.76 8.29 0.99 1.61 3.23 Kohlrabi (Cabbage  FDA 1992  1998) 246 samples/ 0 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF # 23 Kohrabi (Cabbage  FDA 92 98) 2% CT Totalz= 98 TotalFreq = 1 2, 0.001 Chronic AR = 0.013 ppm Chronic AR = 2.78 ppm Chronic AR = 2.78 ppm Chronic AR = 0.001 ppm Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files 38 Dried Beans  Blended FT data 3% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.01 ppm Residues = 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.01 0.05 0.1 0. 16 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.05 Average = 0.067 ppm Acute AR = 0.002 Fresh Succulent Beans PDP 1994 1995 1177 samples/ 44 detects 21% CT  4% detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.01 ppm RDF # 24 Fresh Beans 21% CT Totalz= 930 Totalnz= 44 203, 0.0138 1.6 0. 067 0.45 0.9 0.096 0.064 0.11 0.23 0.37 0.011 0.26 0.086 0.046 0.15 0.06 0.06 0.011 0.04 0.007 0.15 0.007 0.1 0. 18 0. 93 0.15 0.12 0.26 0.082 0.2 0.57 0.25 0.025 0.037 0.31 0.29 0.29 0.13 0.15 1.4 0. 85 0.21 0.02 0.02 0.15 Processed Succulent Beans  PDP 1996 1998 1588 samples/ 161 detects 16% CT  10 % detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.006 ppm RDF # 25 Processed Beans 16% CT Totalz= 1334 Totalnz= 161 242, 0.006 See Appendix L for residues Lima Beans (Processed Succulent Beans PDP 1996 1998) 1588 samples/ 161 detects 16% CT  10 % detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.006 ppm RDF # 26 Lima Beans 30% CT Totalz= 1112 Totalnz= 161 315, 0.006 See Appendix L for residues Chronic AR = 0.067 ppm Chronic AR = 0.023 ppm Chronic AR = 0.012 ppm Chronic AR = 0.012 ppm Peas  FDA 1992 1998 289 samples/ 8 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF #27 Peas  Fresh  FDA 7% CT Totalz= 269 Totalnz= 8 12, 0.001 0.041 0.360 1.160 0.005 0.010 0.005 0.005 0.060 Processed Peas  PDP 1994 1996 1458 samples/ 19 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.011 ppm RDF #28 Processed Peas 5% CT Totalz= 1385 Totalnz= 19 54, 0.011 0.13 0.43 0.086 0.12 0.06 0.01 0.028 0.042 0.06 0.14 0.067 0.0802 0.043 0.37 0.12 0.13 0.05 0.11 0.12 Dried Peas (Blended) FT data 9% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.01 ppm Residues = 0.046 0.048 0.049 0.205 0.212 0.241 0.53 0.555 0.593 0.059 0.061 0.062 0.064 0.07 0.116 0.16 0.179 0.186 0.01 0.01 0.023 0.01 0.01 0.01 Average = 0.146 Acute AR = 0.013 Soybean (Blended) PDP data 749 samples/ 0 detects 1% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.0015 ppm Acute AR = 0.000015 Chronic AR = 0.13 ppm Chronic AR =0.013 ppm Chronic AR =0.146 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0015 ppm Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files 39 Eggplant  FDA 1993 98 112 samples/ 6 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm 21% CT RDF # 29 Eggplant  FDA 21% CT Totalz= 89 Totalnz= 6 17, 0.001 0.01 0.046 0.12 0.061 0.16 0.07 Hot Pepper  FDA 1992 1998 347 samples/ 66 detects 19% detects  2% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF # 30 Non bell peppers 19% detects Totalz= 281 Totalnz= 66 0.048 0.005 0.844 0.28 0.076 0.005 1 0. 9 0.46 0.03 0.016 0.35 1.6 0. 728 0.12 0.16 0.005 0.4 0. 04 0. 03 2.1 0. 31 1. 58 0. 17 0.22 0.9 2. 4 3.3 0.09 0.3 1. 7 0.1 0.5 1.7 1. 9 0.015 0.26 0.24 1.54 0.21 0.38 0.05 0.16 0.23 0.02 4 0. 43 0. 02 0.12 0.86 0.7 0. 8 0.05 0.25 0.15 0.3 0.2 0.1 0. 05 0. 9 0.2 0. 1 0.1 0. 2 0.02 0.06 Sweet Pepper  FDA 1992 1998 430 samples/ 28 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF # 31 Sweet pepper FDA all 30% CT Totalz= 301 Totalnz= 28 101, 0.001 0.300 0.030 0.005 0.170 0.370 0.020 0.600 0.490 0.030 0.175 0.5 0.500 0.800 0.380 0.205 0.100 0.340 0.400 0.090 1.000 0.050 0.120 0.300 0.070 0.050 0.400 0.010 0.100 ProcessedTomatoes  PDP 1996 1998 1613 samples/ 4 detects (0.2% detects) 1/ 2 LOD = 0.0043 ppm RDF #32 Tomatoes  PDP 27 %CT  0.2% detects Totalz= 1177 Totalnz= 4 432, 0.0043 0.008 0.004 0.017 0.007 Chronic AR = 0.005 ppm Chronic AR = 0.108 ppm Chronic AR =0.02 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0044 ppm Fresh Tomatoes  PDP 1996 1998 1613 samples/ 4 detects (0.2% detects) 1/ 2 LOD = 0.0043 ppm RDF #33 Tomatoes  PDP 11% CT  0.2% detects Totalz= 1436 Totalnz= 4 173, 0.0043 0.008 0.004 0.017 0.007 Cucumber  FDA 1992 1998 420 samples/ 13 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF # 34 Cucumber FDA 32% CT  3% detects Totalz= 286 Totalnz= 13 121, 0.001 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.230 0.182 0.121 0.005 0.100 0.070 0.190 0.018 0.034 0.010 Melons (Cantaloupe  PDP 1998) 408 samples/ 2 detects (0.5% detects) 1/ 2 LOD = 0.005 ppm RDF # 35 Cantaloupe  PDP 2% CT  0.5% detects Totalz= 400 Totalnz= 2 6, 0.005 0.01 0.01 Cantaloupe  PDP 1998 408 samples/ 2 detects (0.5% detects) 1/ 2 LOD = 0.005 ppm RDF # 36 Cantaloupe  PDP 9% CT  0.5% detects Totalz= 364 Totalnz= 2 34, 0.005 0.01 0.01 Chronic AR = 0.0044 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0033 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0056 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0056 ppm Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files 40 Honey dew (Cantaloupe  PDP) 1998 408 samples/ 2 detects (0.5% detects) 1/ 2 LOD = 0.005 ppm RDF # 37 Cantaloupe  PDP 44% CT  0.5% detects Totalz= 228 Totalnz= 2 178, 0.005 0.01 0.01 Watermelon  FDA 1992 1998 330 samples/ 4 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF # 38 Watermelon  FDA 15% CT  1% detects Totalz= 281 Totalnz= 4 56, 0.001 0.06 0.1 0.04 0.094 Pumpkin (Winter Squash  PDP 1997 98) 970 samples/ 1 detect 1/ 2 LOD = 0.005 ppm RDF # 39 Pumpkin (Winter Squash  PDP) 56 % CT  0.1% detects Totalz= 426 Totalnz= 1 543, 0.006 0.013 Winter Squash  PDP 1997 1998 970 samples/ 1 detect 1/ 2 LOD = 0.005 ppm RDF #40 Winter Squash  PDP 27 % CT  0.1% detects Totalz= 708 Totalnz= 1 261, 0.006 0.013 Chronic AR = 0.0056 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0019 ppm Chronic AR = 0.006 ppm Chronic AR = 0.006 ppm Summer Squash  FDA 1992 1998 406 samples/ 10 detect 1/ 2 LOD  0.001 ppm 27% CT RDF# 41 Summer Squash  FDA 27% CT  2% detect Totalz= 296 Totalnz= 10 100, 0.001 0.2 0.37 0.005 0.020 0.15 0.16 0.080 0.059 0.460 4.6 Citrus citron, Lime, Tangelos, Tangerine, Grapefruit, and orange ( partially blended food forms) (Orange  PDP 1994 1996) 1892 samples/ 184 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.009 ppm RDF #42 Citrus  PDP 10% detects Totalz= 1656 Totalnz= 184 52, 0.009 see Appendix A for residue values Grapefruit juice (Orange juice PDP data 1997 1998) 1392 samples/ 30 detects 2% detects  6% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.006 ppm RDF #43 Grapefruit juice (Orange juice PDP) 2% detects  6% CT Totalz= 1308 Totalnz= 30 54, 0.006 21, 0.01 7, 0.013 0.031 0.017 Lemon juice (Orange juice PDP data 1997 1998) 1392 samples/ 30 detects 2% detects  7% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.006 ppm RDF #44 Lemon juice (Orange juice PDP) 2% detects  7% CT Totalz= 1295 Totalnz= 30 67, 0.006 21, 0.01 7, 0.013 0.031 0.017 Chronic AR = 0.016 ppm Chronic AR = 0.013 ppm Chronic AR = 0.006 ppm Chronic AR = 0.006 ppm Lime, Tangelos, Tangerine, Grapefruit, lemon, and orange (not blended food forms ) (Orange  PDP 1994 1996) 1892 samples/ 184 detects Residues decomp. (n= 12) Decomposited residues were 0.000043 to 1.68 ppm 1/ 2 LOD = 0.009 ppm RDF #45 Orange PDP decomposited 10% detects Totalz= 9000 Totalnz= 1000 see Appendix B for residue values Lime juice, tangerine juice (Orange juice PDP data 1997 1998) 1392 samples/ 30 detects 2% detects  2% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.006 ppm RDF #46 Lime juice (Orange juice PDP) 2% detects  2% CT Totalz= 1362 Totalnz= 30 21, 0.01 7, 0.013 0.031 0.017 Orange juice PDP data 1997 1998) 1392 samples/ 30 detects 2% detects  5% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.006 ppm RDF #47 Orange juice PDP 2% detects  5% CT Totalz= 1322 Totalnz= 30 40, 0.006 21, 0.01 7, 0.013 0.031 0.017 Apple Non blended  PDP 1994 1996 1909 samples/ 285 detects residues decomposited (n = 15) Decomposited residues range from 0.00008  7.35 ppm 15% detects  31% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.013 ppm RDF #48 Apples  PDP decomp 31% CT  15% detects Totalz= 4600 Totalnz= 1000 1067, 0.013 (1/ 2 LOD) see Appendix C for residue values Chronic AR = 0.013 ppm Chronic AR = 0.006 ppm Chronic AR =0.006 ppm Chronic AR = 0.03 ppm Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files 41 Apples, Dried (Blended) PDP 1994 96 1909 samples/ 285 detects 31% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.01 ppm see Appendix D for residue values Average = 0.03 Acute AR = 0.009 Apple  Partially blended  PDP data 1994 1996 1909 samples/ 285 detects 15% detects  31% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.013 ppm RDF #49 Apples  PDP 31% CT  15% detects Totalz= 1317 Totalnz= 285 see Appendix D for residue values Apple Juice PDP 1996 1998 1554 samples/ 454 detects 29% detects  31% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.006 ppm RDF # 50 Apple juice  PDP 31% CT  15% detects Totalz= 1072 Totalnz= 454 28, 0.006 see Appendix E for residue values Pear PDP decomposition 1997 1998 1420 samples/ 60 detects 4% detects  6% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.0065 ppm n= 13 Decomp. values were 0.000026 to 14.33 RDF # 51 Pear  PDP Totalz= 23500 Totalnz= 1000 500, 0.0065 see App. F for residue values Chronic AR = 0.03 ppm Chronic AR = 0.03 ppm Chronic AR = 0.01 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0098 ppm Partially blended Pear PDP 1997 1998 1420 samples/ 60 detects 4% detects  6% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.0065 ppm RDF # 52 Pear  PDP Totalz= 1335 Totalnz= 60 25, 0.0065 0.24 0.007 0.058 0.12 0.007 0.007 0.017 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.3 0.007 0.007 0.14 0.013 0.042 0.01 0.017 0.05 0.036 0.007 0.01 0.1 0.013 0.007 0.01 0.053 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.061 0.81 0.01 0.11 0.035 0.07 0.076 0.042 0.013 0.007 0.007 0.052 0.45 0.013 0.013 0.042 0.41 0.49 0.12 0.013 0.01 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.013 0.033 0.01 0.01 0.089 Quince (Pear PDP) decomposition 1997 1998 1420 samples/ 60 detects 4% detects  2% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.0065 ppm n= 13 Decomp. values were 0.000026 to 14.33 RDF # 53 Quince  PDP Totalz= 73500 Totalnz= 1000 500, 0.0065 see App. F for residue values Crabapple  Apple PDP data 1994 1996 1909 samples/ 285 detects 15% detects  2% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.013 ppm RDF #54 Crabapple (Apple PDP) 2% CT  15% detects Totalz= 28910 Totalnz= 285 305, 0.013 see Appendix D for residue values Apricot (Peach PDP 1994 1996) 1088 samples/ 168 detects 2% CT 1/ 2 LOD =0.01 ppm RDF #55 Apricot  (Peach PDP) 2 %CT Totalz= 9604 Totalnz= 168 28, 0.01 See Appendix G for residue values Chronic AR = 0.0098 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0098 ppm Chronic AR = 0.033 ppm Chronic AR = 0.07 ppm Apricot (Peach PDP 1994 1996) 1088 samples/ 168 detects 2% CT 1/ 2 LOD =0.01 ppm Residues decomp. ranged from 0.000119  46.3 RDF #56 Apricot  (Peach PDP) 2 %CT Totalz= 58800 Totalnz= 1000 200, 0.01 See Appendix H for residue values Sweet Cherries FDA 1992 98 281 samples/ 89 detects 36% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF # 57 Sweet Cherries 36% CT Totalz= 180 Totalnz= 89 12, 0.001 see Appendix M for residue values Tart Cherries  FDA 1992 98 281 samples/ 89 detects 24% CT  32% detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF # 58 Tart Cherries 32% detects Totalz= 192 Totalnz= 89 see Appendix M for residue values Nectarines (Peaches PDP 1994 1996) 1088 samples/ 168 detects 24% CT  15% detected Residues decomp. ranged from 0.000119  46.3 ppm RDF # 59 Peaches  PDP  decomp 24% CT  15% detected Totalz= 5067 Totalnz= 1000 600, 0.001 see Appendix H for residue values Chronic AR = 0.07 ppm Chronic AR = 0.127 ppm Chronic AR = 0.127 ppm Chronic AR = 0.07 ppm Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files 42 Peaches (not blended) PDP Single Serving 2000 1088 samples/ 168 detects 18% CT  15% detected Residues decomp. ranged from 0.000119  46.3 RDF # 60 Peaches  PDP single serving 18% CT  15% detected Totalz= 438 Totalnz= 79 17, 0.003 see Appendix H for residue values Peaches (partially blended) PDP 1994 1996 1088 samples/ 168 detects 18% CT  15% detected RDF # 61 Peaches  PDP 18% CT  15% detected Totalz= 892 Totalnz= 168 28, 0.001 see Appendix G for residue values Plums FDA FDA 1992 98 51 samples/ 2 detects 4% detects  9 % CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF # 62 Plums  FDA 9% CT Totalz= 46 Totalnz= 2 3, 0.001 0.002 0.002 Blackberries (Raspberry FDA 1992 98) 247 samples/ 51 detects 21 % Detects  44 % CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF # 63 Blackberry (Raspberry FDA) 21% CT Totalz= 138 Totalnz= 51 58, 0.001 3.79 1.52 1.18 0.019 0.04 0.436 2.78 0.298 3.43 0.032 0.028 0.005 0.016 1.13 0.021 0.19 0.02 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.03 0.13 0.005 0.045 0.16 0.13 0.08 0.005 0.034 1.07 0.007 0.063 0.16 0.88 0.005 0.026 0.005 0.35 0.06 0.83 0.005 0.06 3.2 0.23 0.005 0.12 Chronic AR = 0.07 ppm Chronic AR = 0.07 ppm Chronic AR = 0.07 ppm Chronic AR = 0.09 ppm Blueberry  FDA 1992 1998 212 samples/ 23 detects 11 % detects  45% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF #64 Blueberry FDA 45% CT  11% detects Totalz= 117 Totalnz= 23 72, 0.001 0.342 0.245 1.06 0.146 0.112 0.206 0.234 0.005 0.19 4.38 0.119 0.005 0.005 0.52 0.23 2.05 0.08 9.7 0.005 0.02 0.054 0.15 0.012 Boysenberry, Dewberry, Loganberry, Youngberry (Raspberry FDA 1992 98) 247 samples/ 51 detects 21 % Detects  2 % CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF # 65 Boysenberry (Raspberry FDA) 2% CT Totalz= 2499 Totalnz= 51 3.79 1.52 1.18 0.019 0.04 0.436 2.78 0.298 3.43 0.032 0.028 0.005 0.016 1.13 0.021 0.19 0.02 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.03 0.13 0.005 0.045 0.16 0.13 0.08 0.005 0.034 1.07 0.007 0.063 0.16 0.88 0.005 0.026 0.005 0.35 0.06 0.83 0.005 0.06 3.2 0.23 0.005 0.12 Currant, Elderberries, Gooseberries, Huckleberries, Olliaberry (Blueberry  FDA) 1992 1998 153 samples/ 15 detects 11 % detects  2% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF #66 Currant (Blueberry FDA) 2% CT Totalz= 4655 Totalnz= 23 72, 0.001 0.342 0.245 1.06 0.146 0.112 0.206 0.234 0.005 0.19 4.38 0.119 0.005 0.005 0.52 0.23 2.05 0.08 9.7 0.005 0.02 0.054 0.15 0.012 Raspberries  FDA Raspberry FDA 1992 98) 247 samples/ 51 detects 21 % Detects  10 % CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF # 67 Raspberry FDA 10% CT  21% detected Totalz= 196 Totalnz= 51 3.79 1.52 1.18 0.019 0.04 0.436 2.78 0.298 3.43 0.032 0.028 0.005 0.016 1.13 0.021 0.19 0.02 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.03 0.13 0.005 0.045 0.16 0.13 0.08 0.005 0.034 1.07 0.007 0.063 0.16 0.88 0.005 0.026 0.005 0.35 0.06 0.83 0.005 0.06 3.2 0.23 0.005 0.12 Chronic AR = 0.09 ppm Chronic AR = 0.09 ppm Chronic AR = 0.09 ppm Chronic AR = 0.09 ppm Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files 43 Almonds  FT 15 samples RDF # 68 Almonds  FT 4% CT Totalz= 360 Totalnz= 15 0.0614 0.0704 0.0786 0.0822 0.0826 0.0932 0.0304 0.0358 0.0380 0.0704 0.0800 0.0840 0.01 0.0300 0.0384 Chestnuts (Almonds  FT) 15 samples RDF # 69 Chestnuts (Almonds  FT) 2% CT Totalz= 735 Totalnz= 15 0.0614 0.0704 0.0786 0.0822 0.0826 0.0932 0.0304 0.0358 0.0380 0.0704 0.0800 0.0840 0.01 0.0300 0.0384 Filberts (Pecan  FT) 18 samples RDF # 70 Filberts (Pecan  FT) 12% CT Totalz= 132 Totalnz= 18 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.044 0.053 0.053 0.025 0.026 0.045 0.01 0.023 0.027 Pecan  FT 18 samples RDF # 71 Pecan  FT 24% CT Totalz= 57 Totalnz= 18 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.044 0.053 0.053 0.025 0.026 0.045 0.01 0.023 0.027 Chronic AR = 0.059 ppm Chronic AR = 0.059 ppm Chronic AR = 0.022 ppm Chronic AR = 0.022 ppm Walnut  FT 15 samples 2% CT RDF #72 Walnut  FT 2% CT Totalz= 735 Totalnz= 15 0.044 0.064 0.153 0.037 0.043 0.052 0.507 0.811 0.999 0.266 0.389 0.65 0.01 0.01 0.01 Walnut oil  FT Blended 15 samples 2% CT Residues = 0.044 0.064 0.153 0.037 0.043 0.052 0.507 0.811 0.999 0.266 0.389 0.65 0.01 0.01 0.01 Average residue = 0.27 Acute AR = 0.0054 Corn, Fresh  PDP 1994 1996 1306 samples/ 0 detects 1% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.0085 RDF # 73 Fresh Corn 1% CT Totalz= 99 Totalnz= 1 0.0085 Chronic AR = 0.27 ppm Chronic AR = 0.27 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0085 ppm Corn grain  FT Blended 0 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.01 1% CT Acute AR = 0.0001 Millet, Sorghum, Wheat  Blended (Wheat grain PDP) 1563 samples/ 6 detects 1% CT 1557 @ 1/ 2 LOD = 0.0015 0.011 0.004 0.01 0.013 0.005 0.005 Average residue = 0.0015 ppm Acute AR = 0.000015 Rice FT Blended 24 samples 1% CT 7.84 8.48 8.89 6.72 7.08 7.46 9.59 11.6 11.8 2.44 2.75 3.1 9.65 10 10.4 5.55 6.19 6.31 9.68 11.3 11.6 2.57 2.98 3.65 Average Residue = 7.4 ppm Acute AR = 0.074 Asparagus  FDA 1992 98 381 samples/ 6 detects 87% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF # 74 Asparagus  FDA 87% CT Totalz= 50 Totalnz= 6 325, 0.001 0.087 0.504 0.005 0.180 0.069 0.005 Chronic AR = 0.01 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0015 ppm Chronic AR = 7.4 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0032 ppm Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files 44 Bananas  PDP translate to plantains 1994 95 1126 samples/ 0 detects 100 % CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.01 ppm RDF # 75 Bananas  PDP 100% CT Totalz= 0 Totalnz= 1 0.01 Cranberries  FDA 1992  98 111 samples/ 3 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 ppm RDF # 76 Cranberries  FDA 84% CT Totalz= 18 Totalnz= 3 90, 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 Flax seed Blended Field Trial 10 samples No detects <0.02 ppm 1% CT Average Residues = 1/ 2 LOD = 0.01 ppm Acute AR = 0.0001 Grapes PDP 1994 96 1884 samples/ 65 detects 12% CT 1/ 2 LOD = 0.01 ppm RDF # 77 Grapes PDP 12% CT Totalz= 1658 Totalnz= 65 161, 0.01 0.94 0.01 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.013 0.017 0.017 0.017 0.017 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.036 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.047 0.053 0.057 0.061 0.063 0.063 0.067 0.068 0.068 0.071 0.079 0.086 0.088 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.29 0.29 0.34 0.38 0.42 0.43 0.48 0.5 0.52 0.54 0.62 Chronic AR = 0.01 ppm Chronic AR = 0.001 ppm Chronic AR =0.01 ppm Chronic AR = 0.016 ppm Grape juice PDP 1998 665 samples/ 245 detects 37% Detects  12 % CT RDF # 78 Grape juice PDP 37% detects (12% CT) Totalz= 420 Totalnz= 245 See Appendix I for residues Okra Field Trials 10 samples RDF # 79 Okra  FT 94% CT Totalz= 1 Totalnz= 10 2.5 2.99 0.152 0.155 0.399 0.546 0.105 0.32 1.17 1 .65 Olives Field Trials 12 samples RDF # 80 Olives  FT 2% CT Totalz= 588 Totalnz= 12 4.44 5.56 7.49 2.08 2.22 3.95 2.77 3.79 9.83 0.83 1.18 2.11 Olive oil (Olives) Blended Field Trials 12 samples 2% CT 4.44 5.56 7.49 2.08 2.22 3.95 2.77 3.79 9.83 0.83 1.18 2.11 Average residue = 3.85 Acute AR = 0.077 Chronic AR =0.01 ppm Chronic AR = 1.0 ppm Chronic AR = 3.85 ppm Chronic AR = 3.85 ppm Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files 45 Peanuts Blended Field Trial 24 samples/ no detects LOD = <0.02 6% CT Average Residue = 1/ 2 LOD = 0.01 Acute AR = 0.0006 ppm Pineapples  Mexico (Not blended commodites) Decomposited Used 2.5% i n Analysis FDA 1992 98 Imports only 116 Mexican samples/ 94 detects 81% detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 n = 10 Residues were 0.0001  42.7 RDF #81 Pineapples  not blended 81% (detected) Totalz= 235 Totalnz= 1000 see appendix K for residues Pineapples Mexico (Partially blended commodities) Used 2.5% i n Analysis FDA 1992 98 Imports only 116 Mexican samples/ 94 detects 81% detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 RDF # 82 Pineapples  Mexico 81% CT (detected) Totalz= 22 Totalnz= 94 see appendix J for residues Pistachios Field Trials 12 samples RDF #83 Pistachios 38% CT Totalz= 20 Totalnz= 12 0.026 0.026 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.073 0.089 0.099 0.01 0.01 0.01 Chronic AR = 0.01 ppm Chronic AR =0.053 ppm Chronic AR = 0.053 ppm Chronic AR =0.03 ppm Strawberry  FDA 1992  98 436 samples/ 48 detects 1/ 2 LOD = 0.001 RDF #84 Strawberry  FDA 24 % CT Totalz= 331 Totalnz= 48 57, 0.001 0.15 0.2 0. 02 0. 005 0.3 0. 5 0.4 0. 1 0.05 0.3 0. 2 0.005 0.002 0.6 0. 14 0. 005 0.6 3.12 5.3 0. 24 1.35 0.2 0. 24 0. 41 0.005 0.06 0.07 0.03 0.15 0.01 0.35 0.82 1.3 0.01 0.55 0.61 0.13 0.2 1. 1 0.1 3.6 1.7 0. 26 0. 11 0. 44 4 1 Sunflower oil Blended Field Trial data 15 samples 1% CT Residues 0.01 0.029 0.036 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.065 0.079 0.090 0.047 0.077 0.129 Average residue = 0.04 Acute AR = 0.0004 Sunflower seeds Field Trial data 15 samples 1% CT RDF # 85 Sunflower  FT 1% CT Totalz= 1485 Totalnz= 15 0.01 0.029 0.036 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.065 0.079 0.090 0.047 0.077 0.129 Milk translate to ruminant meat and fat Feeding study % CT based on alfalfa, feed grains, and forages % CT of 1%

RDF #86 Milk 1% CT Totalz= 99 Totalnz= 1 0.0299 Chronic AR = 0.0638 ppm Chronic AR = 0.04 ppm Chronic AR = 0.04 ppm Chronic AR = 0.0003 ppm Ruminant Liver Feeding study % CT based on alfalfa, feed grains, and forages % CT of 1%

RDF # 87 Ruminant Liver 1% CT Totalz= 99 Totalnz= 1 0.79 Ruminant Kidney Feeding study % CT based on alfalfa, feed grains, and forages % CT of 1%

RDF # 88 Ruminant Kidney 1% CT Totalz= 99 Totalnz= 1 2.1 Swine Meat Feeding study % CT based on feed grains, and forages % CT of 1%

RDF # 89 Swine Meat 1% CT Totalz= 99 Totalnz= 1 0.036 Swine Fat Feeding study % CT based on feed grains, and forages % CT of 1%

RDF # 90 Swine Fat 1% CT Totalz= 99 Totalnz= 1 0.0192 Chronic AR = 0.0063 Chronic AR = 0.0179 Chronic AR = 0.000348 Chronic AR = 0.000096 Attachment 1: Anticipated Residues Summary Table and Residue Distribution Files 46 Swine Liver Feeding study % CT based on feed grains, and forages % CT of 1%

RDF # 91 Swine Liver 1% CT Totalz= 99 Totalnz= 0.102 Swine Kidney Feeding study % CT based on feed grains, and forages % CT of 1%


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 10, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1186-1188]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00225]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 121

[Docket No.: FAA-2013-0485; Amdt. No. 121-376B]
RIN 2120-AJ94

Revisions to Operational Requirements for the Use of Enhanced
Flight Vision Systems (EFVS) and to Pilot Compartment View Requirements
for Vision Systems; Correcting Amendment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a final rule published on December 13,
2016. In that rule, the FAA amended its regulations to allow operators
to use an enhanced flight vision system (EFVS) in lieu of natural
vision to continue descending from 100 feet above the touchdown zone
elevation (TDZE) to the runway and to land on certain straight-in
instrument approach procedures (IAPs) under instrument flight rules
(IFR). As part of the final rule, the FAA revised appendix F to part
121 to provide greater clarity on the checking requirements for EFVS.
In amending appendix F to part 121, the FAA used amendatory
instructions that inadvertently misplaced new paragraph III(c)(5). This
document amends appendix F to part 121 to correct that error.

DATES: Effective January 10, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry King, Flight Technologies and
Procedures Division, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 13, 2016, the FAA published a final rule entitled,
``Revisions to Operational Requirements for the Use of Enhanced Flight
Vision Systems (EFVS) and to Pilot Compartment View Requirements for
Vision Systems.'' \1\ In that final rule, which became effective, in
part, on March 13, 2017, the FAA created new 14 CFR 91.176 to contain
the operating rules for EFVS operations to touchdown and rollout and
for EFVS operations to 100 feet above the TDZE. The FAA also
established training and recent flight experience requirements for
persons conducting EFVS operations.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 81 FR 90126; corrected at 82 FR 2193, January 9, 2017;
corrected at 82 FR 9677, February 8, 2017.
    \2\ The FAA notes that the training and recent flight experience
requirements of Sec.  61.66 will become effective on March 13, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because part 121 operators authorized to conduct EFVS operations
were already required to train, check, and qualify their pilots on EFVS
in accordance with their Operation Specifications, the FAA excepted
part 121 pilots from the new EFVS recent flight experience
requirements.\3\ The FAA recognized, however, that the requirement to
be qualified for EFVS operations by one of the certificate holder's
check airmen was not as transparent as the requirements to train
crewmembers on EFVS, which are found within the relevant operating
rules of 14 CFR. Therefore, the FAA revised appendix F to part 121 to
provide greater clarity on the checking requirements for EFVS
operations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The EFVS recent flight experience and EFVS refresher
training requirements are contained in Sec.  61.66(d) and (e).
Section 61.66(h)(3) states that the requirements of paragraph (d)
and (e) do not apply to a pilot who is employed by a part 119
certificate holder authorized to conduct operations under part 121,
125, or 135 when the pilot is conducting an EFVS operation for that
certificate holder under part 91, 121, 125, or 135, as applicable,
provided the pilot conducts the operation in accordance with the
certificate holder's operations specifications for EFVS operations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In amending appendix F to part 121, the FAA included amendatory
instructions to amend the Table by adding new entry III.(c)(5).
However, because of the undesignated paragraph following paragraph
III.(c)(4) in appendix F, it was unclear whether new paragraph
III(c)(5) should be published before or after the undesignated
paragraph. When the final rule became effective, paragraph III.(c)(5)
was inadvertently placed after the undesignated paragraph.

Correction

    The FAA did not intend to add paragraph III.(c)(5) after the
undesignated paragraph preceding paragraph III.(d). Instead, paragraph
III(c)(5) should immediately follow paragraph III.(c)(4). The FAA is
therefore revising appendix F to part 121 to relocate paragraph
III.(c)(5) accordingly.
    Because this amendment results in no substantive change, the FAA
finds that the notice and public procedures under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are
unnecessary. For the same reason, the FAA finds good cause exists under
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to make the amendments effective in less than 30
days.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 121

    Air carriers, Aircraft, Airmen, Aviation safety.

Correcting Amendment

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends chapter I of title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:

PART 121--OPERATING REQUIREMENTS: DOMESTIC, FLAG, AND SUPPLEMENTAL
OPERATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 121 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40119, 41706,
42301 preceding note added by Pub. L. 112-95, sec. 412, 126 Stat.
89, 44101, 44701-702, 44705, 44709-44711, 44713, 44716-44717, 44722,
44729, 44732; 46105; Pub. L. 111-216, 124 Stat. 2348 (49 U.S.C.
44701 note); Pub. L. 112-95, 126 Stat. 62 (49 U.S.C. 44732 note).

0
2. In appendix F, revise paragraph III. of the table to read as
follows:

Appendix F to Part 121--Proficiency Check Requirements

* * * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Required                                  Permitted
                             -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Waiver
    Maneuvers/procedures        Simulated                    Visual       Nonvisual     Training     provisions
                               instrument     Inflight      simulator     simulator      device        of Sec.
                               conditions                                                            121.441(d)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           III. Instrument procedures:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Area departure and area             B   ............  ............            B   ............          * B
 arrival. During each of
 these maneuvers the
 applicant must--...........
    (1) Adhere to actual or
     simulated ATC
     clearances (including
     assigned radials); and
    (2) Properly use
     available navigation
     facilities.
    Either area arrival or
     area departure, but not
     both, may be waived
     under Sec.
     121.441(d).
(b) Holding. This maneuver              B   ............  ............            B   ............            B
 includes entering,
 maintaining, and leaving
 holding patterns. It may be
 performed in connection
 with either area departure
 or area arrival............
(c) ILS and other instrument
 approaches. There must be
 the following:
    (1) At least one normal             B   ............            B   ............  ............  ............
     ILS approach...........
    (2) At least one                    B   ............  ............  ............  ............  ............
     manually controlled ILS
     approach with a
     simulated failure of
     one powerplant. The
     simulated failure
     should occur before
     initiating the final
     approach course and
     must continue to
     touchdown or through
     the missed approach
     procedure..............
    (3) At least one                    B   ............            B   ............  ............  ............
     nonprecision approach
     procedure that is
     representative of the
     non-precision approach
     procedures that the
     certificate holder is
     likely to use..........
    (4) Demonstration of at             B   ............  ............  ............            B   ............
     least one nonprecision
     approach procedure on a
     letdown aid other than
     the approach procedure
     performed under
     subparagraph (3) of
     this paragraph that the
     certificate holder is
     approved to use........
    (5) For each type of                B           * B   ............  ............  ............  ............
     EFVS operation the
     certificate holder is
     authorized to conduct,
     at least one instrument
     approach must be made
     using an EFVS. Each
     instrument approach
     must be performed
     according to any
     procedures and
     limitations approved
     for the approach
     facility used. The
     instrument approach
     begins when the
     airplane is over the
     initial approach fix
     for the approach
     procedure being used
     (or turned over to the
     final approach
     controller in the case
     of a GCA approach) and
     ends when the airplane
     touches down on the
     runway or when
     transition to a missed
     approach configuration
     is completed.
     Instrument conditions
     need not be simulated
     below 100' above
     touchdown zone
     elevation..............
    (d) Circling approaches.  ............  ............          * B   ............  ............          * B
     If the certificate
     holder is approved for
     circling minimums below
     1000-3, at least one
     circling approach must
     be made under the
     following conditions...
    (1) The portion of the              B   ............  ............  ............  ............  ............
     approach to the
     authorized minimum
     circling approach
     altitude must be made
     under simulated
     instrument conditions..

    (2) The approach must be
     made to the authorized
     minimum circling
     approach attitude
     followed by a change in
     heading and the
     necessary maneuvering
     by visual reference to
     maintain a flight path
     that permits a normal
     landing on a runway at
     least 90[degrees] from
     the final approach
     course of the simulated
     instrument portion of
     the approach.
    (3) The circling
     approach must be
     performed without
     excessive maneuvering,
     and without exceeding
     the normal operating
     limits of the airplane.
     The angle of bank
     should not exceed
     30[degrees].
If local conditions beyond
 the control of the pilot
 prohibit the maneuver or
 prevent it from being
 performed as required, it
 may be waived as provided
 in Sec.   121.441(d):
 Provided, however, that the
 maneuver may not be waived
 under this provision for
 two successive proficiency
 checks.
The circling approach
 maneuver is not required
 for a second-in-command if
 the certificate holder's
 manual prohibits a second-
 in-command from performing
 a circling approach in
 operations under this part.
(e) Missed Approach
    (1) Each pilot must       ............  ............          * B   ............  ............  ............
     perform at least one
     missed approach from an
     ILS approach...........
    (2) Each pilot in         ............  ............          * P   ............  ............  ............
     command must perform at
     least one additional
     missed approach........
A complete approved missed
 approach procedure must be
 accomplished at least once.
 At the discretion of the
 person conducting a check a
 simulated powerplant
 failure may be required
 during any of the missed
 approaches. These maneuvers
 may be performed either
 independently or in
 conjunction with maneuvers
 required under Sections III
 or V of this appendix. At
 least one missed approach
 must be performed in
 flight.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued under the authority of 49 U.S.C. 106(f) and (g) in
Washington, DC on January 3, 2018.
Lirio Liu,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2018-00225 Filed 1-9-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P