[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 121 (Tuesday, June 23, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37654-37655]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13474]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Third Supplemental Notice of Technical Conference

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increasing Market and Planning             AD10-12-011
 Efficiency and Enhancing Resilience
 through Improved Software.

New York Independent System Operator,     ER19-467-000
 Inc.                                     ER19-467-001
                                          ER19-467-002
                                          ER19-467-003
                                          ER19-467-004
ISO New England Inc.....................  ER19-470-000
                                          ER19-470-001
                                          ER19-470-002
                                          ER19-470-003
                                          ER19-470-004
California Independent System Operator    ER19-468-000
 Corporation.                             ER19-468-001
                                          ER19-468-002
Midcontinent Independent System           ER19-465-000
 Operator, Inc.                           ER19-465-001
                                          ER19-465-002
                                          ER19-465-003
Southwest Power Pool, Inc...............  ER19-460-000
                                          ER19-460-001
                                          ER19-460-002
                                          ER19-460-003
                                          ER19-460-004
                                          ER19-460-005
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C..............  ER19-469-000
                                          ER19-469-001
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As previously announced,\1\ Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
staff will hold an online technical conference on June 23-25, 2020 to
discuss increasing market and planning efficiency and enhancing
resilience through improved software.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Notice of Technical Conference issued on February 14, 2020
(February 14 Notice), Docket No. AD10-12-011; Supplemental Notice of
Technical Conference issued on April 7, 2020 (April 7 Notice),
Docket No. AD10-12-011; Agenda issued June 15, 2020 (June 15
Agenda), Docket No. AD10-12-011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The June 15 Agenda provided a list of presentations scheduled to be
given at the conference. While the intent of the technical conference
is not to focus on any specific matters before the Commission, some
conference participants have submitted presentations that focus on
topics related to energy storage. These topics include state-of-charge
management, which is at issue in proceedings that are currently pending
before the Commission. These proceedings include the following:

New York Independent System Operator, Inc., Docket No. ER19-467-000,
ER19-467-001, ER19-467-002, ER19-467-003, ER19-467-004
ISO New England, Inc., Docket No. ER19-470-000, ER19-470-001, ER19-470-
002, ER19-470-003, ER19-470-004
California Independent System Operator Corporation, Docket No. ER19-
468-000, ER19-468-001, ER19-468-002
Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., Docket No. ER19-465-
000, ER19-465-001, ER19-465-002, ER19-465-003
Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Docket No. ER19-460-000, ER19-460-001,
ER19-460-002, ER19-460-003, ER19-460-004, ER19-460-005
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., Docket No. ER19-469-000, ER19-469-001

    As noted in the February 14 notice and in the April 7 notice, the
technical conference will not be transcribed and the WebEx will not be
recorded. However, listening to or participating in the technical
conference is open to the public (noting the registration requirement
discussed below) and free of charge. Furthermore, the slides presented
at the conference will be published in Docket No. AD10-12-011, and the
presentations related to energy storage will be published in the above
listed dockets concerning Order No. 841 compliance.
    Finally, to facilitate participation by interested parties, the
deadline for attendees to register for the conference is extended to
5:00 p.m. EDT on June 22, 2020. Attendees must register through the
Commission's website by that deadline to ensure a WebEx connection is
available.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The attendee registration form is located at https://www.ferc.gov/whatsnew/registration/real-market-6-23-20-form.asp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For further information, please contact individuals identified for
each topic:

    Technical Information for Docket No. AD10-12-011: Alexander Smith,
Office of Energy Policy and Innovation, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Logistical Information: Sarah McKinley, Office of External Affairs,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: June 17, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-13474 Filed 6-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 152 (Thursday, August 6, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47638-47641]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17043]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0600; Product Identifier 2019-CE-043-AD; Amendment
39-21154; AD 2020-13-09]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; DG Flugzeugbau GmbH Gliders

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
DG Flugzeugbau GmbH Models DG-500 Elan Orion, DG-500 Elan Trainer, DG-
500/20 Elan, DG-500/22 Elan, DG-500M, and DG-500MB gliders and certain
Models DG-1000S and DG-1000T gliders. This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as the rear locking rod of the rear canopy rotating out of
the threads of the operating mechanism, which could lead to blocking of
the canopy emergency release system, preventing safe escape of
occupants from the glider. The FAA is issuing this AD to require
actions to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective August 26, 2020.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of August 26,
2020.
    The FAA must receive comments on this AD by September 21, 2020.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For the DG Flugzeugbau GmbH service information and Repair
Instruction RI-DG-05 identified in this AD, contact DG-Flugzeugbau
GmbH, Otto Lilienthal Weg 2, D-76646, Bruchsal, Germany, telephone: +49
(0) 7251 3020-0, fax: +49 (0) 7251 3020-200; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet: https://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/en/.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on
the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0600.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0600; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other information. The street address for Docket
Operations is listed above. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, General Aviation & Rotorcraft Section, International Validation
Branch, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone:
(816) 329-4165; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the
Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has
issued EASA AD No. 2019-0237R1, dated September 24, 2019, (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for DG
Flugzeugbau GmbH Models DG-500 Elan Orion, DG-500 Elan Trainer, DG-500/
20 Elan, DG-500/22 Elan, DG-500M and DG-500MB, and certain Models DG-
1000S and DG-1000T gliders. The MCAI states:

    Occurrences have been reported where the rear locking rod of the
rear canopy rotated out of the threads of the operating mechanism.
Due to the similarity in design, the front canopy locking mechanism
may also be affected.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to
blocking of the canopy emergency release system, possibly preventing
safe escape of the occupant(s) from the (powered) sailplane in case
of an in-flight emergency.
    To address this unsafe condition, DG-Flugzeugbau published the
TN [DG-Flugzeugbau GmbH Technical Note TN1000/42 and TN500/13] and
the RI [Repair Instruction RI-DG-05] to provide inspection and
repair instructions.
    For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD requires
repetitive inspections of the front and rear canopy to determine if
the end of the rear locking rod protrudes over the canopy frame
contour, and annual checks of the front and rear canopy rear locking
rods to determine that they are screwed in tightly, and, depending
on findings, repair of the canopy rear locking rods. This [EASA] AD
also requires amendment of the applicable Aircraft Flight Manual
(AFM).
    This [EASA] AD is revised to remove the references to the TN
instruction paragraphs, which have changed with TN issue 01.b. The
revised TN issues were added to the list of reference publications.

    You may examine the MCAI on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0600.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed DG Flugzeugbau GmbH Technical Note No. 1000/42,
Document No. TM1000-42 FE-29-01, Issue 01.b, dated September 11, 2019;
and Technical Note TN500/13, Document No. TM1000-42 FE-29-01, Issue
01.b, dated September 11, 2019; which are co-published as one document.
The service information contains procedures for inspecting the rear
locking rods on both the front and rear canopy for rod protrusion.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Other Related Service Information

    The FAA also reviewed Repair Instruction RI-DG-05, dated August 15,
2019. The service information is referenced in DG Flugzeugbau GmbH
Technical Note No. 1000/42, Document No. TM1000-42 FE-29-01, Issue
01.b, dated September 11, 2019; and Technical Note TN500/13, Document
No. TM1000-42 FE-29-01, Issue 01.b, dated September 11, 2019; and
contains procedures for repairing the rear locking rods of the canopy
lock.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the AD

    These products have been approved by the aviation authority of
another country and are approved for operation in the United States.
Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design
Authority, it has notified us of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information referenced above. The FAA is issuing this
AD because it evaluated all information provided by the State of Design
Authority and determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI

    The MCAI requires a daily inspection of the front and rear canopy,
and this AD does not.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because the
FAA has determined that the required corrective actions must be
accomplished before further flight. Therefore, the FAA finds good cause
that notice and opportunity for prior public comment are impracticable.
In addition, for the reason stated above, it finds that good cause
exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and the FAA did not precede it by notice and opportunity for
public comment. The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data,
views, or arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2020-0600;
Product Identifier 2019-CE-043-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date and may
amend this AD because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive
verbal contact received about this AD.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this AD contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this AD, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this AD. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Jim
Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, General Aviation & Rotorcraft
Section, International Validation Branch, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not
specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for
this rulemaking.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD will affect 47 products of U.S.
registry. The FAA also estimates that it would take 1.5 work-hours per
product to inspect the canopy rear locking rods. In addition, the FAA
estimates that it would take 0.5 work-hour per product to revise the
aircraft flight manual. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, the FAA estimates the annual cost of this
AD on U.S. operators to be $7,990, or $170 per product.
    In addition, the FAA estimates that any necessary follow-on repairs
to the canopy rear locking rods will take 8 work-hours and require
parts costing $200, for a cost of $880 per product. The

FAA has no way of determining the number of products that may need
these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) do not
apply when an agency finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt
a rule without prior notice and comment. Because FAA has determined
that it has good cause to adopt this rule without notice and comment,
RFA analysis is not required.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866, and
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2020-13-09 DG Flugzeugbau GmbH: Amendment 39-21154; Docket No. FAA-
2020-0600; Product Identifier 2019-CE-043-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August 26,
2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to DG Flugzeugbau GmbH Models DG-500 Elan Orion,
DG-500 Elan Trainer, DG-500/20 Elan, DG-500/22 Elan, DG-500M, and
DG-500MB gliders, all serial numbers; and DG-1000S and DG-1000T
gliders, serial numbers up to and including 10-144; certificated in
any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 44: Cabin
Systems.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by the rear locking rod of the rear canopy
rotating out of the threads of the operating mechanism. Due to the
similarity in design, the front canopy locking mechanism may also be
affected. The FAA is issuing this AD to repetitively inspect the
front and rear canopy locking rods, and make repairs as necessary,
to prevent blocking of the canopy emergency release system, which
could affect the evacuation of occupants from the glider in an
emergency.

 (f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) Before further flight after August 26, 2020 (the effective
date of this AD), revise the flight manual for your glider by
inserting the flight manual pages listed in Instruction 5 of DG
Flugzeugbau GmbH Technical Note (TN) No. 1000/42, Document No.
TM1000-42 FE-29-01, Issue 01.b, dated September 11, 2019, and TN No.
500/13, Document No. TM1000-42 FE-29-01, Issue 01.b, dated September
11, 2019, which are co-published as one document (TM1000-42 FE-29-
01). This action may be performed by the owner/operator (pilot)
holding at least a private pilot certificate and must be entered
into the aircraft records showing compliance with this AD in
accordance with 14 CFR 43.9 (a)(1) through (4) and 14 CFR
91.417(a)(2)(v). The record must be maintained as required by 14 CFR
91.417, 121.380, or 135.439.
    (2) Before further flight after August 26, 2020 (the effective
date of this AD), and thereafter at each annual inspection, inspect
the rear locking rods of the front and rear canopy and repair any
discrepancies by following Instructions 1 through 3 in TM1000-42 FE-
29-01.

 (g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, Small Airplane Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Jim
Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, General Aviation & Rotorcraft
Section, International Validation Branch, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (816)
329-4090; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved
AMOC on any glider to which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards
District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

(h) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI European Union Aviation Safety Agency AD No. 2019-
0237R1, dated September 24, 2019. You may examine the MCAI on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0600.

(i) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) DG Flugzeugbau GmbH Technical Note No. 1000/42 Document No.
TM1000-42 FE-29-01, Issue 01.b, dated September 11, 2019.
    (ii) DG Flugzeugbau GmbH Technical Note No. TN500/13, Document
No. TM1000-42 FE-29-01, Issue 01.b, dated September 11, 2019.

    Note 1 to paragraph (i)(2) of this AD: DG Flugzeugbau GmbH
Technical Note No. 1000/42 Document No. TM1000-42 FE-29-01, Issue
01.b, dated September 11, 2019; and DG Flugzeugbau GmbH Technical
Note No. TN500/13, Document No. TM1000-42 FE-29-01, Issue 01.b,
dated September 11, 2019, are co-published as one document.

    (3) For the DG Flugzeugbau GmbH service information and Repair
Instruction RI-DG-05 identified in this AD, contact DG-Flugzeugbau
GmbH, Otto Lilienthal Weg 2, D-76646, Bruchsal, Germany, telephone:
+49 (0) 7251 3020-0, fax: +49 (0) 7251 3020-200; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet: https://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/en/.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is
also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0600.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA,

email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on June 19, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-17043 Filed 8-5-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 20833]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07566]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-797-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Update (Conoco Apr 4, 2022) to be effective 4/4/2022.
    Filed Date: 4/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220401-5113.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/13/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-798-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Cherokee
AGL--Replacement Shippers--Apr 2022 to be effective 4/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 4/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220401-5133.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/13/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-800-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Colonial 262963 and Vitol
262964--NR Agmts to be effective 4/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 4/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220401-5183.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/13/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-801-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Update (Hartree) to be effective 4/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 4/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220401-5185.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/13/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-802-000.
    Applicants: Nautilus Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Various
Customers eff 4-1-22 to be effective 4/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 4/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220401-5229.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/13/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-803-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: ANR--Freepoint Commodities
137467 Negotiated Rate Agreement to be effective 4/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 4/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220401-5231.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/13/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-804-000.
    Applicants: High Point Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: High Point Gas Transmission Annual
LAUF Filing to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 4/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220401-5273.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/13/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-805-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Update (SoCal Apr 2022) to be effective 4/4/2022.
    Filed Date: 4/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220401-5308.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/13/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-806-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: SWN FTS 244599 Rev. 1
Amendment to be effective 4/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 4/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220401-5384.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/13/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-807-000.
    Applicants: Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: Ozark Gas Actual Fuel Use Filing to
be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 4/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220401-5391.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 4/13/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 4, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-07566 Filed 4-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: May 26, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 102)]
[Notices]
[Page 30456-30458]
[DOCID:fr26my06-135]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-53835; File No. SR-NYSE-2006-31]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to the NYSE Retail Trading Product and the NYSE Program
Trading Product

May 18, 2006.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 8, 2008, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange''), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the NYSE. The Exchange
has filed the proposal pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the

Act,\3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to introduce two new market data products:
The NYSE Retail Trading Product and the NYSE Program Trading Product.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site (http://www.nyse.com), at the NYSE's Office of the Secretary, and

at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NYSE included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Clause (b)(16) of Exchange Rule 132B (``Order Tracking
Requirements'') requires members to record the type of account for
which each order is submitted. NYSE proposes to make available to
vendors and investors the following:
    (1) The NYSE Retail Trading Product will consist of (A) a real-time
datafeed of certain execution report information that has been recorded
as trades for accounts of ``individual investors'' \5\ and (B) an end-
of-day summary of the retail trading activity on the Exchange for that
day, including total buy-and-sell retail share volume for each stock
traded.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For this purpose, the ``account of an individual investor''
means an account covered by section 11(a)(1)(E) of the Act. That
section refers to the ``account of a natural person, or a trust
created by a natural person for himself or another natural person.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (2) The NYSE Program Trading Product will consist of (A) a real-
time datafeed of certain execution report information that has been
recorded as program trades \6\ and (B) an end-of-day summary of program
trading activity on the Exchange for that day, including total index
arbitrage (as opposed to non-index arbitrage) program trading volume.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ For this purpose, ``program trading'' has the definition
that Supplementary Material .40(b) to NYSE Rule 80A (``Index
Arbitrage Trading Restrictions'') gives to that term.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Each published report of a trade execution that is included in the
datafeed for either product shall indicate such information as the
security's symbol, the size of the trade, the time of the trade's
execution and other related information.\7\ (More information regarding
the NYSE Retail Trading Product and the NYSE Program Trading Product
can be found on the NYSE Web site at http://www.nysedata.com/InfoTools.
)

    The Exchange believes the NYSE Retail Trading Product should
provide investors with increased information regarding individual
investors' trading activity on the Exchange. Similarly, the NYSE
Program Trading Product should provide investors with increased
information regarding program trading activity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ NYSE will only include in the NYSE Retail Trading Product
and the NYSE Program Trading Product information that is attached to
execution reports. While the NYSE believes the information contained
in the NYSE Retail Trading Product and the NYSE Program Trading
Product is accurate, the NYSE does not guarantee the completeness or
accuracy of account information submitted by order entry firms on
which the InfoTools product is based.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the proposed rule change, the Exchange proposes to
introduce the NYSE Retail Trading Product and the NYSE Program Trading
Product without charge as a 60-day pilot program, commencing 30 days
from the Exchange's submission of the proposed rule change to the
Commission.
    In a companion proposed rule change that the Exchange has filed
contemporaneously with the proposed rule change (see File No. SR-NYSE-
2006-32), the Exchange proposes to establish fees for the NYSE Retail
Trading Product and the NYSE Program Trading Product. The Exchange
plans to commence to impose those fees upon the later of Commission
approval of that filing and the end of the pilot program.
    The Exchange is not proposing to impose any attribution
requirements on vendors displaying NYSE Trading Information. However,
the Exchange believes that it is incumbent on vendors to identify and
display information in a manner that avoids investor confusion. This is
especially true at a time when markets are offering investors, who have
grown accustomed to viewing consolidated information over the past
three decades, many new exchange-specific information services.
    Thus, while the Exchange is not proposing to impose any attribution
requirement, it does propose to have vendors provide, by link or
otherwise, a description of the NYSE Retail Trading Product and NYSE
Program Trading Product in a manner that is reasonably transparent and
accessible to subscribers of the two products. The Exchange will
require the Exhibit A to each vendor's contract with the Exchange for
the receipt and redistribution of the NYSE Retail Trading Product and
NYSE Program Trading Product to describe how the vendor will make the
description available.
    The description should read substantially as follows:

    NYSE Rule 132B requires each NYSE member firm to record for each
order that it submits to the Exchange such information as whether
the firm is placing the order for the account of a retail customer
or whether the order results from program trade trading activity.
NYSE uses this information to produce the NYSE Retail Trading
Product and NYSE Program Trading Product, each of which includes
real-time information relating to retail trading and program trading
activity, respectively, as well as daily summaries and historical
databases of that information.
    While the NYSE believes the information contained in the NYSE
Retail Trading Product and NYSE Program Trading Product is accurate,
Customer understands that its agreement with NYSE provides that NYSE
(1) reserves all rights to that information, (2) does not guarantee
the completeness or accuracy of account information submitted by
order entry firms on which the InfoTools product is based, and (3)
shall not be liable for any loss due either to their negligence or
to any cause beyond their reasonable control.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of section 6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and with
section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and, in general,
to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments regarding the proposed rule change. The Exchange has not
received any unsolicited written comments from Exchange participants or
other interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing proposed rule change is subject to section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder \11\
because the proposal: (i) Does not significantly affect the protection
of investors or the public interest; (ii) does not impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) does not become operative
prior to 30 days after the date of filing or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest; provided that the Exchange has given the
Commission notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. NYSE
satisfied the five-day pre-filing requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors or otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NYSE-2006-31 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2006-31. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the NYSE. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSE-2006-31 and should be submitted on or before June
16, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-8095 Filed 5-25-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: April 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 77)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 18477-18479]
[DOCID:fr23ap09-11]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0261; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-017-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; DORNIER LUFTFAHRT GmbH Models Dornier
228-100, Dornier 228-101, Dornier 228-200, Dornier 228-201, Dornier
228-202, and Dornier 228-212 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); extension of
the comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier NPRM for the products listed above.
This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    Excessive wear on a guide pin of a power lever has been detected
during inspections. The total loss of the pin could cause loss of
the flight idle stop and lead to inadvertent activation of the beta
mode in flight. The inadvertent activation of beta mode in flight
can result in loss of control of the airplane.

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 26, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Davison, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0261;
Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-017-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 with an earlier NPRM for the
specified products, which was published in the Federal Register on
March 25, 2009 (74 FR 12737). That earlier NPRM proposed to require
actions intended to address the unsafe condition for the products
listed above.
    Since that NPRM was issued, we realized our interpretation of the
initial compliance time was different than that in the MCAI and service
bulletin based on differences between the FAA's regulatory authority
and that of the State of Design. In particular, the FAA does not
specifically mandate inspections at 9,600 hours time-in-service (TIS)
and at 1,200-hour TIS intervals without issuing an AD. The intent of
the MCAI was based on these inspection intervals being mandatory.
Therefore, the following should be incorporated into the NPRM:
     Those airplanes that did not have the guide pins inspected
within 9,600 hours TIS should be inspected within 100 hours TIS;
     Those airplanes with more than 1,200 hours TIS since the
last inspection and that have not had the pins replaced since that
inspection should have the inspection done again within 100 hours TIS;
     All airplanes should be inspected at intervals not to
exceed 1,200 hours TIS, unless the pins are replaced; and
     Replacement of the pins would allow 9,600 hours TIS before
a follow-on inspection.

Relevant Service Information

    RUAG Aerospace Defence Technology has issued Dornier 228 Alert
Service Bulletin ASB-228-279, dated December 19, 2008. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.
    Certain changes described above expand the scope of the earlier
NPRM.

As a result, we have determined that it is necessary to extend the
comment period to provide additional opportunity for the public to
comment on the proposed AD.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service
Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will
affect 17 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 20 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $10 per product.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $27,370, or $1,610 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

DORNIER LUFTFAHRT GmbH: Docket No. FAA-2009-0261; Directorate
Identifier 2009-CE-017-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by May 26, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Models Dornier 228-100, Dornier 228-101,
Dornier 228-200, Dornier 228-201, Dornier 228-202, and Dornier 228-
212 airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 76: Engine
Controls.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    Excessive wear on a guide pin of a power lever has been detected
during inspections. The total loss of the pin could cause loss of
the flight idle stop and lead to inadvertent activation of the beta
mode in flight. The inadvertent activation of beta mode in flight
can result in loss of control of the airplane.
    For the reasons described above, this new EASA Airworthiness
Directive (AD) introduces a repetitive detailed inspection of the
guide pins of the power and condition levers and requires the
replacement of the pins that exceed the allowable wear-limits.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Do the following actions per the instructions in RUAG
Aerospace Defence Technology Dornier 228 Alert Service Bulletin ASB-
228-279, dated December 19, 2008:
    (1) Initial Inspection: Unless already done within the last
1,200 hours TIS as of the effective date of this AD, inspect upon
accumulating 9,600 hours on the guide pins of the power and
condition levers or within the next 100 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
    (2) Repetitive Inspections: Inspect within 1,200 hours since the
last inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,200 hours TIS.
    (3) Replacement: Replace the guide pins as follows:
    (i) Before further flight, after any inspection required in
paragraphs (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD, where any guide pin exceeds
the acceptable wear-limits as defined in the service bulletin; and
    (ii) Prior to any required inspection, you may install new power
and condition levers guide pins instead of doing the inspections
required in this AD. You must then inspect or install new pins upon
accumulating 9,600 hours TIS and follow the repetitive inspection
intervals of this AD if replacement is not made.

    Note 1:  If the hours TIS of the throttle box assembly is
unknown, you may use the hours TIS of the airplane to determine the
compliance time for the inspection.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2:  This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Greg Davison, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved.

Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved
by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are
required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to
service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI EASA AD No.: 2009-0031, dated February 18,
2009; and RUAG Aerospace Defence Technology Dornier 228 Alert
Service Bulletin ASB-228-279, dated December 19, 2008, for related
information.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April 16, 2009.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9-9327 Filed 4-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

Issued by the Department of Transportation on January 25, 2006

   NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2003-16570

________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Application of US AIRWAYS, INC (US AIRWAYS) filed 11/18/05 for:

XX  Renewal of exemption under 49 U.S.C. 40109 to provide the following
service:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail (1)
from a point or points in the United States via intermediate points to a
point or points in El Salvador and beyond, and (2) from a point or
points in the United States via intermediate points to a point or points
in Guatemala and beyond, and to integrate this authority with its
existing authorities.

Applicant rep: Howard Kass<PHONE_NUMBER>   DOT Analyst: Thuy H. Cooper
(202) 366-5423

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX  Granted (subject to conditions, see below)

The above action granting exemption authority was effective when taken:
January 25, 2006, through January 25, 2008.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

XX  The authority granted is consistent with the aviation agreements
between the United States and El Salvador, and the United States and
Guatemala.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

XX Holder’s certificates of public convenience and necessity

XX Standard exemption conditions (attached)

Conditions:  The authority granted to serve intermediate and beyond
points is limited to countries with which the United States has signed
open-skies agreements and/or countries for which US Airways holds
authority to serve under certificates and exemptions issued by the
Department.

The route integration authority granted is subject to the condition that
any service provided under this exemption shall be consistent with all
applicable agreements between the United States and the foreign
countries involved.  Furthermore, (a) nothing in the award of the route
integration authority granted should be construed as conferring upon US
Airways rights (including fifth-freedom intermediate and/or beyond
rights) to serve markets where U.S. carrier entry is limited unless US
Airways notifies the Department of its intent to serve such a market and
unless and until the Department has completed any necessary carrier
selection procedures to determine which carrier(s) should be authorized
to exercise such rights); (b) should there be a request by any carrier
to use the limited-entry route rights that are included in US Airways’
authority by virtue of the route integration exemption granted here, but
that are not then being used by US Airways, the holding of such
authority by route integration will not be considered as providing any
preference for US Airways in a competitive carrier selection proceeding
to determine which carrier(s) should be entitled to use the authority at
issue.

________________________________________________________________________
_

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department's regulations, we found the applicant qualified to provide
the exemption services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted or dismissed, we denied all requests in the
referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

U.S. Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the U.S. carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2)  Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3)  Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4)  Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, including, but not limited to, 49 CFR Part 1544.
To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, the holder shall, before commencing any new service
(including charter flights) to or from a foreign airport, contact its
International Principal Security Inspector (IPSI) to advise the IPSI of
its plans and to find out whether the Transportation Security
Administration has determined that security is adequate to allow such
airport(s) to be served; and

(7)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations
of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the
United States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.

05/2004

 PAGE


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 31 (Thursday, February 16, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10860-10863]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03028]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0797; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-007-AD;
Amendment 39-18776; AD 2017-01-09]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting an airworthiness directive (AD) that
published in the Federal Register. That AD applies to certain The
Boeing Company Model 767-300 and 767-300F airplanes. Certain service
information citations in the preamble and regulatory text are
incorrect. This document corrects those errors. In all other respects,
the original document remains the same.

DATES: This final rule is effective February 21, 2017.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of February 21,
2017 (82 FR 4778, January 17, 2017).

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2013-
0797.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Francis Smith, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Controls Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Airworthiness Directive 2017-01-09,
amendment 39-18776 (82 FR 4778, January 17, 2017), requires
modification and installation of components in the main equipment
center for certain Model 767-300 and 767-300F series airplanes. For
certain airplanes, AD 2017-01-09 also requires modification,
replacement, and installation of flight deck air relief system (FDARS)
components.

Need for the Correction

    As published, certain service information citations in the preamble
and regulatory text were incorrect. The incorrectly specified citation
in the preamble and regulatory text was Boeing Service Bulletin 767-27-
0244, Revision 1, dated March 8, 2010 (``SB 767-27-0244, R1''); the
correct citation is Boeing Service Bulletin 767-21-0244, Revision 1,
dated March 8, 2010 (``SB 767-21-0244, R1'').

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed the following service information.
     Boeing Service Bulletin 767-21-0235, dated October 8,
2009; and Revision 1, dated July 29, 2011 (``SB 767-21-0235, R1''). The
service information describes procedures for a relay installation and
related wiring changes (which change (modify) the 3-way valve control
logic for the cooling system for the flight deck display equipment on
freighter airplanes).
     Boeing Service Bulletin 767-21-0244, Revision 1, dated
March 8, 2010 (``SB 767-21-0244, R1''). The service information
describes procedures for changing (modifying) the 3-way valve control
logic and installing a cooling system for the flight deck display
equipment.
     Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-21A0245, Revision 2,
dated September 27, 2013 (``ASB 767-21A0245, R2''); and Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 767-21A0247, Revision 1, dated April 9, 2013 (``ASB
767-21A0247, R1''). The service information describes procedures for
changing (modifying) the 3-way valve control logic and main cargo air
distribution system (MCADS), and installing an FDARS. These documents
are distinct since they apply to different airplane models.
     Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-21A0253, dated October
12, 2012. The service information describes procedures for replacing
the existing duct, installing an FDARS, changing (modifying) the 3-way
valve control logic, and installing a new altitude switch and pitot
tube.
     Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-21A0254, dated June 7,
2013. The service information describes procedures for replacing the
duct with a new duct; installing an FDARS (including the installation
of mounting brackets, ducts, orifice, outlet valve, and screen); and
activating the 3-way valve logic (including modification of the
associated wiring and related actions).
     Boeing Service Bulletin 767-31-0073, dated October 12,
1995. The service information describes procedures for installing a
maintenance data selection system for the engine indication and crew
alerting system.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Correction of Publication

    This document corrects errors in the citation of certain service
information and correctly adds the AD as an amendment to 14 CFR 39.13.
Although no other part of the preamble or regulatory information has
been corrected, we are publishing the entire rule in the Federal
Register.
    The effective date of this AD remains February 21, 2017.
    Since this action only corrects errors in the citation of certain
service information, it has no adverse economic impact and imposes no
additional burden on any person. Therefore, we have determined that
notice and public procedures are unnecessary.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Correction

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Corrected]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2017-01-09 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18776; Docket No. FAA-
2013-0797; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-007-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective February 21, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 767-300 and 767-300F
series airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified in the
service information specified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(5) of
this AD. This AD does not apply to The Boeing Company Model 767-300
(passenger) series airplanes.
    (1) Boeing Service Bulletin 767-21-0244, Revision 1, dated March
8, 2010 (``SB 767-21-0244, R1'').
    (2) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-21A0245, Revision 2, dated
September 27, 2013 (``ASB 767-21A0245, R2'').
    (3) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-21A0247, Revision 1, dated
April 9, 2013 (``ASB 767-21A0247, R1'').
    (4) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-21A0253, dated October 12,
2012.
    (5) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-21A0254, dated June 7,
2013.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 21, Air
Conditioning.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of malfunctions in the flight
deck display units, which resulted in blanking, blurring, or loss of
color on the display. We are issuing this AD to prevent malfunctions
of the flight deck display units, which could affect the ability of
the flight crew to read the displays for airplane attitude,
altitude, or airspeed, and consequently reduce the ability of the
flight crew to maintain control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Installation of Flight Deck Air Relief System (FDARS) and 3-Way
Valve Logic Change or Activation

    (1) For Model 767-300F series airplanes, as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 767-21A0253, dated October 12, 2012: Within
72 months after the effective date of this AD, in the main equipment
center and the area under the left and right sides of the flight
deck floor, replace the existing duct with a new duct; install an
FDARS (including the installation of mounting brackets, ducts,
orifice, outlet valve, and screen); change the 3-way valve logic
(including modification of the associated wiring and related
actions); and install a new altitude switch and pitot tube; in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 767-21A0253, dated October 12, 2012.
    (2) For Model 767-300F series airplanes, as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 767-21A0254, dated June 7, 2013: Within 72
months after the effective date of this AD, in the main equipment
center and the area under the left and right sides of the flight
deck floor, replace the duct with a new duct; install an FDARS
(including the installation of mounting brackets, ducts, orifice,
outlet valve, and screen); and activate the 3-way valve logic
(including modification of the associated wiring and related
actions); in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-21A0254, dated June 7, 2013.

(h) Installation of FDARS and a 3-Way Valve Control Logic and Main
Cargo Air Distribution System Change

    (1) For Model 767-300F series airplanes, as identified in ASB
767-21A0245, R2: Within 72 months after the effective date of this
AD, in the main equipment center and the area under the left and
right sides of the flight deck floor, change (modify) the 3-way
valve control logic and main cargo air distribution system (MCADS),
and install an FDARS, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instruction of ASB 767-21A0245, R2, except as provided by paragraph
(j) of this AD.
    (2) For Model 767-300F series airplanes, as identified in ASB
767-21A0247, R1: Within 72 months after the effective date of this
AD, change (modify) the 3-way valve control logic and MCADS, and
install an FDARS, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of ASB 767-21A0247, R1.

(i) Installation of a Flight Deck Display Equipment Cooling System and
a 3-Way Valve Logic Change

    For Model 767-300 series airplanes that have been converted by
Boeing to Model 767-300BCF (Boeing Converted Freighter) airplanes,
as identified in SB 767-21-0244, R1: Within 72 months after the
effective date of this AD, change (modify) the 3-way valve control
logic and install a flight deck display equipment cooling system, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of SB 767-21-0244,
R1.

(j) Exception to Paragraph (h)(1) of This AD

    For Model 767-300F series airplanes, as identified in ASB 767-
21A0245, R2: If the 3 way valve control logic change (modification)
specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 767-21-0235, dated October 8,
2009; or Revision 1, dated July 29, 2011 (``SB 767-21-0235, R1'');
is done prior to or concurrent with the actions required by
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, operators need to do only the
functional test, FDARS installation, and flex duct change, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of ASB 767-21A0245,
R2. Operators do not need to do the other actions specified in the
Accomplishment Instructions of ASB 767-21A0245, R2, if the actions
in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 767-
21-0235, dated October 8, 2009; or SB 767-21-0235, R1; are done
concurrently. If the functional test fails, before further flight,
do corrective actions that are approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this AD.

(k) Concurrent Requirements

    (1) For Groups 1 and 3 airplanes, as identified in ASB 767-
21A0245, R2: Prior to or concurrently with accomplishing the
requirements of paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, do the relay
installation and related wiring changes specified in, and in
accordance with, the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service
Bulletin 767-21-0235, dated October 8, 2009; or SB 767-21-0235, R1.
    (2) For Group 1 airplanes, as identified in ASB 767-21A0247, R1:
Prior to or concurrently with accomplishing the requirements of
paragraph (h)(2) of this AD, do the relay installation and related
wiring changes specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Service Bulletin 767-21-0235, dated October 8, 2009; or SB
767-21-0235, R1.
    (3) For Model 767-300 series airplanes that have been converted
by Boeing to Model 767-300BCF airplanes, as identified in SB 767-21-
0244, R1: Prior to or concurrently with accomplishing the
requirements of paragraph (i) of this AD, do all the actions
(installation) specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Service Bulletin 767-31-0073, dated October 12, 1995.

(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (m) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. To be approved, the
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must
meet the certification basis of the airplane and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.

(m) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Francis Smith,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Controls Branch,
ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:425 917-6590; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
February 21, 2017 (82 FR 4778, January 17, 2017).
    (i) Boeing Service Bulletin 767-21-0235, dated October 8, 2009.

    (ii) Boeing Service Bulletin 767-21-0235, Revision 1, dated July
29, 2011.
    (iii) Boeing Service Bulletin 767-21-0244, Revision 1, dated
March 8, 2010.
    (iv) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-21A0245, Revision 2,
dated September 27, 2013.
    (v) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-21A0247, Revision 1, dated
April 9, 2013.
    (vi) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-21A0253, dated October
12, 2012.
    (vii) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-21A0254, dated June 7,
2013.
    (viii) Boeing Service Bulletin 767-31-0073, dated October 12,
1995.
    (4) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (5) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (6) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 2, 2017.
Michael Kaszycki,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-03028 Filed 2-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 66658]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27128]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday,
November 8, 2012 at 2:00 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Gallagher, as duty officer, voted to consider the
items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday,
November 8, 2012 will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    A litigation matter; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the
Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 1, 2012.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. 2012-27128 Filed 11-2-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72403-72404]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30143]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0004; FRL-9327-9]

Access to Confidential Business Information by Primus Solutions,
Inc.

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has authorized its contractor, Primus Solutions, Inc.,
(Primus) of Greenbelt, MD, to access information which has been
submitted to EPA under all sections of the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA). Some of the information may be claimed or determined to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI).

DATES: Access to the confidential data will occur on or about November
17, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact:
Pamela Moseley, Information Management Division (7407M), Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 564-8956; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this notice apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. This action may,
however, be of interest to all who manufacture, process, or distribute
industrial chemicals. Since other entities may also be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may
be affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0004. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index available at http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPPT
Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) at
Rm. 3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC.
The EPA/DC Public Reading Room hours of operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number of the EPA/DC Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the OPPT Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Docket visitors
are required to show photographic identification, pass through a metal
detector, and sign the EPA visitor log. All visitor bags are processed
through an X-ray machine and subject to search. Visitors will be
provided an EPA/DC badge that must be visible at all times in the
building and returned upon departure.

II. What action is the agency taking?

    Under EPA Contract Number EP-W-11-024, Task Order Number 22,
contractor Primus of 6303 Ivy Lane, Suite 130, Greenbelt, MD, will
assist the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) in managing
the Confidential Business Information Center (CBIC), which is the
centralized point of contact for TSCA CBI records and serves as the
repository for these records. Primus will also receive, data enter,
copy, track, and distribute records in accordance with the TSCA CBI
Protection Manual.
    In accordance with 40 CFR 2.306(j), EPA has determined that under
EPA Contract Number EP-W-11-024, Task Order Number 22, Primus will
require access to CBI submitted to EPA under all sections of TSCA to
perform successfully the duties specified under the contract. Primus'
personnel will be given access to information submitted to EPA under
all sections of TSCA. Some of the information may be claimed or
determined to be CBI.
    EPA is issuing this notice to inform all submitters of information
under all sections of TSCA that EPA may provide Primus access to these
CBI materials on a need-to-know basis only. All access to TSCA CBI
under this contract will take place at EPA Headquarters in accordance
with EPA's TSCA CBI Protection Manual.
    Access to TSCA data, including CBI, will continue until October 2,
2016. If the contract is extended, this access will also continue for
the duration of the extended contract without further notice.
    Primus' personnel will be required to sign nondisclosure agreements
and will be briefed on appropriate security procedures before they are
permitted access to TSCA CBI.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Confidential business information.

    Dated: November 14, 2011.
Mario Caraballo,
Acting Director, Information Management Division, Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2011-30143 Filed 11-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49510-49511]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19750]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9900-04-OEI]

Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision
Approval, State of Montana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's approval of the State of Montana's
request to revise its National Primary Drinking Water Regulations
Implementation EPA-authorized program to allow electronic reporting.

DATES: EPA's approval is effective September 13, 2013 for the State of
Montana's National Primary Drinking Water Regulations Implementation
program, if no timely request for a public hearing is received and
accepted by the Agency.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evi Huffer, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop
2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566-
1697<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Karen Seeh, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop 2823T, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media
Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) was published in the Federal
Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR.
CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory
alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure
that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper
counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local
government agencies that receive,

or wish to begin receiving, electronic reports under their EPA-
authorized programs must apply to EPA for a revision or modification of
those programs and obtain EPA approval. Subpart D provides standards
for such approvals based on consideration of the electronic document
receiving systems that the state, tribe, or local government will use
to implement the electronic reporting. Additionally, Sec.  3.1000(b)
through (e) of 40 CFR part 3, subpart D provides special procedures for
program revisions and modifications to allow electronic reporting, to
be used at the option of the state, tribe or local government in place
of procedures available under existing program-specific authorization
regulations. An application submitted under the subpart D procedures
must show that the state, tribe or local government has sufficient
legal authority to implement the electronic reporting components of the
programs covered by the application and will use electronic document
receiving systems that meet the applicable subpart D requirements.
    On July 12, 2012 the Montana Department of Environmental Quality
(MT DEQ) submitted an application titled ``Safe Drinking Water
Information System Lab to State'' for revision of its EPA-authorized
Part 142 program under title 40 CFR. EPA reviewed MT DEQ's request to
revise its EPA-authorized program and, based on this review, EPA
determined that the application met the standards for approval of
authorized program revision set out in 40 CFR part 3, subpart D, for
electronic reporting of drinking water data that does not require
signature or include an electronic signature. In accordance with 40 CFR
3.1000(d), this notice of EPA's decision to approve Montana's request
to revise its Part 142--National Primary Drinking Water Regulations
Implementation program, to allow electronic reporting of drinking water
data that does not require signature or include an electronic
signature, is being published in the Federal Register.
    MT DEQ was notified of EPA's determination to approve its
application with respect to the authorized program listed above.
    Also, in today's notice, EPA is informing interested persons that
they may request a public hearing on EPA's action to approve the State
of Montana's request to revise its authorized public water system
program under 40 CFR part 142, in accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(f).
Requests for a hearing must be submitted to EPA within 30 days of
publication of today's Federal Register notice. Such requests should
include the following information:
    (1) The name, address and telephone number of the individual,
organization or other entity requesting a hearing;
    (2) A brief statement of the requesting person's interest in EPA's
determination, a brief explanation as to why EPA should hold a hearing,
and any other information that the requesting person wants EPA to
consider when determining whether to grant the request;
    (3) The signature of the individual making the request, or, if the
request is made on behalf of an organization or other entity, the
signature of a responsible official of the organization or other
entity.
    In the event a hearing is requested and granted, EPA will provide
notice of the hearing in the Federal Register not less than 15 days
prior to the scheduled hearing date. Frivolous or insubstantial
requests for hearing may be denied by EPA. Following such a public
hearing, EPA will review the record of the hearing and issue an order
either affirming today's determination or rescinding such
determination. If no timely request for a hearing is received and
granted, EPA's approval of the State of Montana's request to revise its
part 142--National Primary Drinking Water Regulations Implementation
program to allow electronic reporting will become effective 30 days
after today's notice is published, pursuant to CROMERR section
3.1000(f)(4).

    Dated: August 8, 2013.
Andrew Battin,
Director, Office of Information Collection.
[FR Doc. 2013-19750 Filed 8-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P