[Federal Register: April 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 68)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 19017-19019]
[DOCID:fr08ap08-17]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-29240; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-076-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Models 175 and
175A Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) Models 175 and 175A airplanes.
This proposed AD would require you to check the airplane logbook to
determine if the original engine mounting brackets have been replaced.
If the original engine mounting brackets are still installed, this
proposed AD would require you to repetitively inspect those brackets
for cracks and replace any cracked engine mounting bracket. After
replacing all four original engine mounting brackets, no further action
would be required by this proposed AD. This proposed AD was prompted by
a report that the engine became detached from the firewall during
landing on one of the affected airplanes. We are proposing this AD to
detect and correct cracks in the engine mounting brackets, which could
result in failure of the engine mounting bracket. This failure could
lead to the engine detaching from the firewall.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 9, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD:
     DOT Docket Web site: Go to http://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Cessna Aircraft Company, Product Support, P.O. Box 7706, Wichita,
Kansas 67277; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Park, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100,
Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-
mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number, ``FAA-
2007-29240; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-076-AD'' at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall
regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed
AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may
amend the proposed AD in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive concerning this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We received a report of the engine detaching from the firewall on a
Cessna Model 175 airplane during landing. Investigation revealed that
cracks in the two top engine mounting brackets behind the firewall
caused the brackets to fail. This resulted in the top half of the
firewall failing, pulling forward and down about 18 inches.
    The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Materials
Laboratory examined the cracked brackets. The examination revealed that
the metal content of the brackets did not contain the constituent
elements of the specified material and was approximately 40 percent
below the specified strength. The NTSB determined that reduced
structural integrity of the engine mounting brackets resulted in
fatigue cracks developing in the brackets.
    We agree with the NTSB's determination that inadequate materials
used in manufacturing the engine mounting brackets, which were used on

Cessna Models 175 and 175A airplanes manufactured from 1958 through
1960, caused the engine mounting brackets to crack.
    This condition, if not corrected, could cause the engine mounting
brackets to fail. This failure could result in the engine detaching
from the firewall.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SEB07-2,
Revision 2, dated June 18, 2007. The service information describes
procedures for:
     Inspecting the upper and lower engine mounting brackets on
both the left and right sides for cracks; and
     Replacing cracked engine mounting brackets.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all information and
determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist
or develop on other products of the same type design. This proposed AD
would require you to check the airplane logbook to determine if the
original engine mounting brackets have been replaced. If the original
engine mounting brackets are still installed, this proposed AD would
require you to repetitively inspect those brackets for cracks and
replace any cracked engine mounting bracket. After replacing all four
original engine mounting brackets, no further action would be required
by this proposed AD. This proposed AD would require you to use the
service information described previously to perform these actions.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 1,218 airplanes in
the U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to do each proposed inspection:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Total cost per   Total cost on
                  Labor cost                              Parts cost                airplane      U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7.5 work-hours x $80 per hour = $600.........  Not applicable.................            $600         $730,800
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do the proposed replacements.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Total cost per
           Labor cost                 Parts cost           airplane
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 work-hours per bracket x $80    $200 per bracket.   $440 per bracket.
 per hour = $240 per bracket. 4    4 x $200 = $800     $1,760 to replace
 brackets per airplane x $240      for all 4           all 4 brackets.
 per bracket = $960.               brackets.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket that contains the proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information on
the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>)
is located at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Cessna Aircraft Company: Docket No. FAA-2007-29240; Directorate
Identifier 2007-CE-076-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) action by June 9, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to the following airplane models and serial
numbers that are certificated in any category:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Model                              Serial Nos.                      Year manufactured
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) 175.................................  55001 through 55703.............  1958.
(2) 175.................................  55704 through 56238.............  1959.
(3) 175.................................  28700A, 626, and 640............  1958 and 1959.
(4) 175A................................  691, and 56239 through 56777....  1960.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unsafe Condition

    (d) A report that the engine became unattached from the firewall
during landing on one of the affected airplanes prompts this AD. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracks in the engine
mounting brackets, which could result in failure of the engine
mounting bracket. This failure could lead to the engine detaching
from the firewall.

Compliance

    (e) To address this problem, you must do the following, unless
already done:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Actions                            Compliance                         Procedures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Check the airplane logbook to          Within the next 30 days      The owner/operator holding at least a
 determine if all four of the original      after the effective date     private pilot certificate as authorized
 engine mounting brackets have been         of this AD.                  by section 43.7 of the Federal Aviation
 replaced.                                                               Regulations (14 CFR 43.7) may do this
                                                                         action.
(2) If you can positively determine that   Not applicable.............  Make an entry into the aircraft logbook
 all four of the original engine mounting                                showing compliance with this portion of
 brackets have been replaced, no further                                 the AD in accordance with section 43.9
 action is required.                                                     of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
                                                                         CFR 43.9). The owner/operator holding
                                                                         at least a private pilot certificate as
                                                                         authorized by section 43.7 of the
                                                                         Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
                                                                         43.7) may do this action.
(3) If you cannot positively determine     Initially inspect within     Follow Cessna Single Engine Service
 that all four of the original engine       the next 12 months after     Bulletin SEB07-2, Revision 2, dated
 mounting brackets have been replaced,      the effective date of this   June 18, 2007.
 inspect each of the upper and lower        AD. If no cracks are
 engine mounting brackets on both the       found, repetitively
 left and right sides for cracks as         inspect thereafter at
 specified in the service bulletin.         intervals not to exceed
                                            500 hours time-in-service
                                            (TIS) until all four of
                                            the original engine
                                            mounting brackets are
                                            replaced.
(4) If cracks are found in any of the      Before further flight after  Follow Cessna Single Engine Service
 engine mounting brackets during any        the inspection in which      Bulletin SEB07-2, Revision 2, dated
 inspection required in paragraph (e)(3)    cracks are found.            June 18, 2007.
 of this AD, replace the cracked engine     Replacing the cracked
 mounting bracket(s).                       engine mounting bracket
                                            terminates the repetitive
                                            inspection required in
                                            paragraph (e)(3) of this
                                            AD only for the replaced
                                            engine mounting bracket.
(5) To terminate the repetitive            At any time before or after  Follow Cessna Single Engine Service
 inspections required in paragraph (e)(3)   the initial inspection       Bulletin SEB07-2, Revision 2, dated
 of this AD, you may replace all four       required in paragraph        June 18, 2007.
 original engine mounting brackets.         (e)(3) of this AD.
(6) Dispose of every replaced bracket      Before further flight after  Not applicable.
 following 14 CFR 43.10, paragraph          the engine mounting
 (c)(6), which states the following:        bracket is removed for
 ``Mutilation. The part may be mutilated    replacement.
 to deter its installation in a type
 certificated product. The mutilation
 must render the part beyond repair and
 incapable of being reworked to appear to
 be airworthy.''
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (f) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Gary Park, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Wichita ACO, 1801 Airport
Road, Room 100, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:
316-946-4107; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards
District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

Related Information

    (g) To get copies of the service information referenced in this
AD, contact Cessna Aircraft Company, Product Support, P.O. Box 7706,
Wichita, Kansas 67277; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (316) 942-
9006. To view the AD docket, go to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, or
on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov. The docket number is Docket
No. FAA-2007-29240; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-076-AD.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March 31, 2008.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-7258 Filed 4-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: November 27, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 227)]
[Notices]
[Page 68597-68599]
[DOCID:fr27no06-90]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP06-54-000, Docket No. CP06-055-000]

Broadwater Energy LLC, Broadwater Pipeline LLC; Notice of
Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the
Proposed Broadwater LNG Project

November 17, 2006.
    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) in cooperation with the U.S. Coast Guard (Coast Guard);
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(COE); National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine
Fisheries Service; and the New York Department of State has prepared a
draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a liquefied natural gas
(LNG) import terminal and natural gas pipeline (referred to as the
Broadwater LNG Project) proposed by Broadwater Energy LLC and
Broadwater Pipeline LLC (jointly referred to as Broadwater) in the
above-referenced dockets. Broadwater Energy LLC is jointly owned by
TCPL USA LNG, Inc. (a subsidiary of TransCanada Corporation) and Shell

Broadwater Holdings LLC (a subsidiary of Shell Oil Company). Broadwater
Pipeline LLC is owned by Broadwater Energy LLC.
    The proposed LNG terminal would be located in New York State waters
of Long Island Sound, approximately 9 miles from the nearest shoreline
of Long Island, and about 11 miles from the nearest shoreline in
Connecticut. The terminal would be a floating storage and
regasification unit (FSRU) that would be attached to a yoke mooring
system (YMS) that includes a mooring tower embedded in the seafloor.
The FSRU would look like a marine vessel and would remain moored in
place for the duration of the Project (expected to be 30 years or
more). The YMS would allow the FSRU to pivot or ``weathervane'' around
the YMS, enabling the FSRU to orient in response to the prevailing
wind, tide, and current conditions.
    LNG would be delivered to the FSRU by LNG carriers, temporarily
stored, vaporized (regasified), and then transported in a new subsea
natural gas pipeline that would extend from the seafloor beneath the
FSRU approximately 21.7 miles to an offshore connection with the
existing Iroquois Gas Transmission System (IGTS) pipeline in Long
Island Sound.
    Natural gas would be routed from the FSRU to the subsea pipeline
and into the IGTS pipeline for delivery at an average flow rate of
about 1.0 billion cubic feet per day. LNG would be delivered to the
FSRU by 2 to 3 LNG carriers per week to meet the Project's planned
send-out volumes of natural gas. LNG carriers would transit from the
Atlantic Ocean to either the Point Judith Pilot Station (northeast of
Block Island) or the Montauk Pilot Station (southwest of Block Island).
From the Point Judith Pilot Station, carriers would transit Block
Island Sound north of Block Island, head generally west to enter Long
Island Sound at its eastern end (an area known as the Race), and then
proceed to the FSRU. From the Montauk Pilot Station, carriers would
head generally northwest to approach the Race, then proceed to the
FSRU.
    The draft EIS addresses the potential environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the following LNG and natural gas
pipeline facilities:
     A double-hulled FSRU approximately 1,215 feet long and 200
feet wide, with a closed-loop shell-and-tube vaporization system and a
total storage capacity of 350,000 cubic meters (approximately 8 billion
cubic feet);
     A berthing facility at the FSRU for receiving LNG ships
with capacities up to 250,000 cubic meters;
     A YMS embedded in the seafloor to moor the FSRU;
     Approximately 2 to 3 LNG carriers per week that would call
at the FSRU;
     LNG carriers that would transit through waters subject to
federal jurisdiction as well as waters under the jurisdiction of the
state of New York, and in some cases, may transit waters under the
jurisdiction of the states of Rhode Island and Connecticut;
     Approximately 21.7 miles of 30-inch-diameter natural gas
pipeline, a pig launcher and receiver facility, and a meter station at
the interconnect with the IGTS pipeline; and
     Onshore facilities at either Greenport or Port Jefferson,
New York, including administrative offices, a warehouse, guardhouse,
and an existing commercial pier.
    Broadwater proposes to construct the Project in two phases. The
first phase would include installation of the subsea pipeline between
October 2009 and April 2010. The second phase would include
installation of the YMS, hookup of the FSRU, and connection of the
project components between September and December 2010. Broadwater
anticipates that the Project would be in service by the end of December
2010.
    As part of this evaluation, FERC staff has prepared a draft EIS to
assess the environmental impacts of the Project. The draft EIS was
prepared to satisfy the requirements of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA).
    The Coast Guard has assessed potential risks to navigation safety
and port security associated with the proposed Project. The Coast
Guard's safety and security assessment is documented in the Captain of
the Port Long Island Sound's Waterways Suitability Report (WSR). The
draft EIS includes an analysis of the environmental impacts related to
the Coast Guard's Letter of Recommendation (LOR) regarding the
suitability of the involved waterways for LNG carrier operations.
    The Coast Guard Captain of the Port Long Island Sound will issue an
LOR to Broadwater Energy and the appropriate federal, state and local
agencies, in accordance with 33 CFR 127.009. The LOR, which will be
based on the Coast Guard's WSR, is an official determination regarding
the suitability or unsuitability of Long Island Sound to support the
proposed FSRU and associated LNG marine traffic. The Coast Guard
intends to adopt all or portions of the EIS being prepared by FERC to
serve as the NEPA analysis for the LOR. The LOR will not be issued
until after the NEPA process has been completed.
    The draft EIS also evaluates alternatives to the proposal,
including alternative energy sources, system alternatives, alternative
sites for the LNG import terminal, alternative designs, pipeline
alternatives, and alternatives to the Coast Guard LOR action. Based on
the analysis included in the draft EIS, the FERC staff concludes that
approval of the proposed Project with appropriate mitigating measures
as recommended, would have limited adverse environmental impacts.

Comment Procedures and Public Meetings

    Any person wishing to comment on the draft EIS may do so. To ensure
consideration prior to a Commission decision on the proposal, it is
important that we receive your comments before the date specified
below. Please carefully follow these instructions to ensure that your
comments on the draft EIS are received in time and properly recorded:
     Send an original and two copies of your comments to:
Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First St., NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.
     Label one copy of the comments for the attention of Gas 3,
PJ-11.3;
     Reference Docket No. CP06-54-000 and CP06-55-000;
     Mail your comments so that they will be received in
Washington, DC on or before January 23, 2007.
    In addition to or in lieu of sending written comments, we invite
you to attend the public comment meetings that we will conduct in the
Project area in January 2007. The locations and times of these meetings
will be provided in a separate notice. These meetings will be posted on
the Commission's calendar located at http:/www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx
 along with other relevant information. The Coast Guard

will participate in these public meetings. The public meetings will
also support the review of Broadwater's permit application that is
before the COE. Interested groups and individuals are encouraged to
attend the public comment meetings and present oral comments on the
draft EIS. A transcript of the meetings will be prepared and submitted
to the docket for public review.
    After comments on the draft EIS are reviewed, any significant new
issues are investigated, and modifications are made to the draft EIS, a
final EIS will be published and distributed by FERC staff. The final
EIS will contain the

staff's responses to timely comments received on the draft EIS.
    Comments will be considered by the Commission but will not serve to
make the commentor a party to the proceeding. Any person seeking to
become a party to the proceeding must file a motion to intervene
pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedures (18 CFR 385.214). Anyone may intervene in this proceeding
based on this draft EIS. You must file your request to intervene as
specified above. You do not need intervenor status to have your
comments considered.
    The draft EIS has been placed in the public files of the FERC and
is available for distribution and public inspection at: Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    CD-ROM copies of the draft EIS have been mailed to Federal, State,
and local agencies; public interest groups; and individuals who
requested a copy of the draft EIS or provided comments during scoping;
libraries and newspapers in the Project area; and parties to this
proceeding. Hard copy versions of the draft EIS were mailed to those
specifically requesting them. A limited number of hard copies and CD-
ROMs are available from the Public Reference Room identified above.
    Additional information about the Project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at 1-866-208-FERC or on the
FERC Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link.

Click on the eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the
docket number excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number
field. Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,

contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link on the FERC Internet Web site
also provides access to the texts of formal documents issued by the
Commission, such as orders, notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission now offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries and direct links to
the documents. Go to the eSubscription link on the FERC Internet Web
site.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-19940 Filed 11-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 105 (Friday, May 31, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32676-32678]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12920]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2013-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1318]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Title
44, Part 65 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR part 65). The
LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to calculate
appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and the
contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will become effective on the
dates listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS
report in effect prior to this determination for the listed
communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has ninety (90)
days in which to request through the community that the Deputy
Associate Administrator for Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email)

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR Part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Chief executive
       State and county          Location and       officer of       Community map    Online location of Letter       Effective date of       Community
                                   case No.          community        repository           of map revision              modification             No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arkansas: Garland............  City of Hot       The Honorable     City Hall Annex,  http://www.rampp-team.com/  September 23, 2013........       050084
                                Springs (13-06-   Ruth Carney,      111 Opera         lomrs.htm.
                                1387P).           Mayor, City of    Street, Hot
                                                  Hot Springs,      Springs
                                                  133 Convention    National Park,
                                                  Boulevard, Hot    AR 71901.
                                                  Springs
                                                  National Park,
                                                  AR 71901.
New Jersey: Morris...........  Township of       The Honorable     Hanover Township  http://www.rampp-team.com/  July 25, 2013.............       340343
                                Hanover (12-02-   Ronald F.         Engineering       lomrs.htm.
                                1077P).           Francioli,        Department,
                                                  Mayor, Township   1000 Route 10,
                                                  of Hanover,       Whippany, NJ
                                                  1000 Route 10,    07981.
                                                  Whippany, NJ
                                                  07981.
Oklahoma:
    Tulsa....................  City of Sand      The Honorable     Public Works      http://www.rampp-team.com/  July 19, 2013.............       400211
                                Springs (12-06-   Mike Burdge,      Building, 109     lomrs.htm.
                                3836P).           Mayor, City of    North Garfield
                                                  Sand Springs,     Avenue, Sand
                                                  P.O. Box 338,     Springs, OK
                                                  Sand Springs,     74063.
                                                  OK 74063.
    Tulsa....................  Unincorporated    The Honorable     Tulsa County      http://www.rampp-team.com/  July 19, 2013.............       400462
                                areas of Tulsa    Karen Keith,      Annex Building,   lomrs.htm.
                                County (12-06-    Chairman, Tulsa   633 West 3rd
                                3836P).           County Board of   Street, Room
                                                  Commissioners,    140, Tulsa, OK
                                                  500 South         74127.
                                                  Denver Avenue,
                                                  Tulsa, OK 74103.
Texas:
    Bexar....................  City of San       The Honorable     Municipal Plaza,  http://www.rampp-team.com/  July 22, 2013.............       480045
                                Antonio (12-06-   Julian Castro,    114 Commerce      lomrs.htm.
                                2419P).           Mayor, City of    Street, 7th
                                                  San Antonio,      Floor, San
                                                  P.O. Box          Antonio, TX
                                                  839966, San       78205.
                                                  Antonio, TX
                                                  78283.
    Bexar....................  City of San       The Honorable     Municipal Plaza,  http://www.rampp-team.com/  July 29, 2013.............       480045
                                Antonio (12-06-   Julian Castro,    114 Commerce      lomrs.htm.
                                4141P).           Mayor, City of    Street, 7th
                                                  San Antonio,      Floor, San
                                                  P.O. Box          Antonio, TX
                                                  839966, San       78205.
                                                  Antonio, TX
                                                  78283.
    Bexar....................  City of           The Honorable     City Hall, 2150   http://www.rampp-team.com/  July 15, 2013.............       480049
                                Universal City    John Williams,    Universal City    lomrs.htm.
                                (12-06-3821P).    Mayor, City of    Boulevard,
                                                  Universal City,   Universal City,
                                                  2150 Universal    TX 78148.
                                                  City Boulevard,
                                                  Universal City,
                                                  TX 78148.
    Bexar....................  Unincorporated    The Honorable     Bexar County      http://www.rampp-team.com/  July 17, 2013.............       480035
                                areas of Bexar    Nelson W.         Public Works      lomrs.htm.
                                County (13-06-    Wolff, Bexar      Department, 233
                                0666P).           County Judge,     North Pecos-La
                                                  101 West Nueva    Trinidad
                                                  Street, 10th      Street, Suite
                                                  Floor, San        420, San
                                                  Antonio, TX       Antonio, TX
                                                  78205.            78207.
    Cameron..................  Town of South     The Honorable     4601 Padre        http://www.rampp-team.com/  July 26, 2013.............       480115
                                Padre Island      Robert N.         Boulevard,        lomrs.htm.
                                (12-06-3922P).    Pinkerton, Jr.,   South Padre
                                                  Mayor, Town of    Island, TX
                                                  South Padre       78597.
                                                  Island, 4601
                                                  Padre
                                                  Boulevard,
                                                  South Padre
                                                  Island, TX
                                                  78597.
    Parker...................  City of           The Honorable     102 East 2nd      http://www.rampp-team.com/  July 25, 2013.............       480521
                                Springtown (13-   Doug Hughes,      Street,           lomrs.htm.
                                06-0392P).        Mayor, City of    Springtown, TX
                                                  Springtown, 102   76082.
                                                  East 2nd
                                                  Street,
                                                  Springtown, TX
                                                  76082.

    Parker...................  Unincorporated    The Honorable     Parker County     http://www.rampp-team.com/  July 25, 2013.............       480520
                                areas of Parker   Mark Riley,       Courthouse, 1     lomrs.htm.
                                County (13-06-    Parker County     Courthouse
                                0392P).           Judge, 1          Square,
                                                  Courthouse        Weatherford, TX
                                                  Square,           76086.
                                                  Weatherford, TX
                                                  76086.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2013-12920 Filed 5-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register: July 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 145)]
[Notices]
[Page 44841]
[DOCID:fr29jy10-100]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2010-0193]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Revision of a
Currently-Approved Information Collection Request: Transportation of
Household Goods; Consumer Protection

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FMCSA published a notice in the Federal Register of July
21, 2010, requesting comments by Aug. 20, 2010, concerning an
information collection request (ICR), ``Transportation of Household
Goods; Consumer Protection,'' OMB Control Number 2126-0025. An error
was discovered in the previous calculations of respondents.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James R. Dubose, Commercial
Enforcement Division, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, West
Building 6th Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Correction

    In the Federal Register of July 21, 2010, FR Doc. 2010-17746 on
page 42476, in the first column, correct ``Respondents: 6,000 household
goods movers'' to read:
    Respondents: 8,500 [6,000 household goods movers + 2,500
consumers].

    Issued on: July 23, 2010.
Kelly Leone,
Director, Office of Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2010-18631 Filed 7-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register: March 31, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 62)]
[Notices]
[Page 16917-16919]
[DOCID:fr31mr08-116]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57551; File No. SR-ISE-2008-28]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Exposure
of Public Customer Orders

March 25, 2008.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 18, 2008, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the
``Exchange'' or the ``ISE''), filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been substantially
prepared by ISE. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The ISE is proposing to expose public customer orders that are not
executable on the Exchange before sending an order through the
intermarket linkage system (a ``Linkage Order'') on behalf of the
public customer. The text of the proposed rule change is available on
the Exchange's Web site (http://www.iseoptions.com), at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, ISE included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. ISE has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The ISE will not automatically execute a customer's options order

when the ISE's best bid or offer (``BBO'') is inferior to the national
best bid or offer (``NBBO'').\3\ Under ISE Rule 803(c)(2)(ii), the
primary market maker (``PMM'') is obligated to address public customer
orders that are not automatically executed because there is a better
price on another exchange. Rule 803(c) specifies that the PMM can
either execute the order or send a Linkage Order to any other exchange
displaying the best price in an attempt to get the better price for the
public customer.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See ISE Rule 714.
    \4\ ISE Rules, Chapter 19 (Intermarket Linkage Rules).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the current procedure, if the PMM does not execute the public
customer order, it sends a Linkage Order(s) to a competing exchange(s)
even though there may be other ISE market makers who would be willing
to execute the public customer order at the better price. Additionally,
when a PMM sends a Linkage Order to another exchange, it is charged the
other exchange's execution fee. Therefore, the cost to the PMM of
sending the Linkage Order can be substantial, particularly with respect
to other options exchanges that have adopted a maker-taker fee
schedule. To retain as much order flow as possible on the ISE and to
help reduce PMM costs by reducing the number of Linkage Orders they
need to send to other exchanges, we propose to expose public customer
orders to all ISE market makers before the PMM sends a Linkage Order to
another exchange to give all ISE market makers an opportunity to
provide the public customer with the best price.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Immediate-or-cancel orders are cancelled if they cannot be
executed on the ISE upon entry. Therefore, such orders are not
handled by the PMM under Rule 803(c)(2)(ii) and will not be exposed
under this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, under the proposal, before the PMM sends a Linkage
Order on behalf of a public customer, the public customer order will be
exposed at the NBBO price for a period established by the Exchange not
to exceed one second.\6\ During the exposure period, Exchange market
makers may enter responses up to the size of the order being exposed in
the regular trading increment applicable to the option. If at the end
of the exposure period, the order is executable at the then-current
NBBO and the ISE is not at the then-current NBBO, the order will be
executed against responses that equal or better the then-current
NBBO.\7\ The exposure period will be terminated if the exposed order
becomes executable on the ISE at the prevailing NBBO or if the Exchange
receives an unrelated order that could trade against the exposed order
at the prevailing NBBO price.\8\ If, after an order is exposed, the
order cannot be executed in full on the Exchange at the then-current
NBBO or better, and it is marketable against the then-current NBBO, the
PMM will send a Linkage Order on the customer's behalf for the balance
of the order as provided in Rule 803(c)(2)(ii). If the balance of the
order is not marketable against the then-current NBBO, it will be
placed on the ISE book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Exchange will issue a Circular to inform members of the
time period.
    \7\ Executions will be allocated pro-rata based on size (i.e.,
the percentage of the total number of contracts available at the
same price that is represented by the size of a market maker's
response).
    \8\ The order will be executed against orders and quotes on the
book and responses received during the exposure period in price
priority. At the same price, customer orders will be executed first
in time priority and then all other interest (orders, quotes and
responses) will be allocated pro-rata based on size.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
section 6(b) of the Act \9\ in general and furthers the objectives of
section 6(b)(5) of the Act \10\ in particular in that it should promote
just and equitable principles of trade, serve to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and protect investors and the public interest. Exposing
public customer orders before the PMM sends a Linkage Order on the
public customer's behalf will give additional ISE participants an
opportunity to provide the orders an execution at the NBBO on the ISE
and reduce PMM costs by reducing the number of Linkage Orders sent to
other exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    This proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any written comments from members or other interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding, or (ii) as to
which ISE consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2008-28 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2008-28. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the
Commission's Public Reference Room on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be
available for

inspection and copying at the principal office of ISE. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2008-28 and should be
submitted on or before April 21, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-6546 Filed 3-28-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P