[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 249 (Monday, December 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 67785]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28379]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-84948; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2018-044]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on Proceedings To
Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change, as
Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Amend BZX Rule 14.11(c) (Index Fund
Shares)

December 21, 2018.
    On June 21, 2018, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``BZX'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
amend BZX Rule 14.11(c) to permit either the portfolio holdings of a
series of Index Fund Shares or the index underlying a series of Index
Fund Shares to satisfy the listing standards under BZX Rules
14.11(c)(3), (4), and (5). The proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on July 11, 2018.\3\ On August 23,
2018, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\4\ the Commission
designated a longer period within which to approve the proposed rule
change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings
to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule
change.\5\ On September 28, 2018, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to
the proposed rule change, which amended and replaced the proposed rule
change as originally filed. On October 5, 2018, the Commission
published notice of Amendment No. 1 and instituted proceedings pursuant
to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \6\ to determine whether to approve
or disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No.
1.\7\ The Commission has received one comment letter on the proposed
rule change.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83594 (July 5,
2018), 83 FR 32158.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83919, 83 FR 44083
(August 29, 2018).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84378, 83 FR 51745
(October 12, 2018).
    \8\ See letter from Kyle Murray, Assistant General Counsel, Cboe
Global Markets, Inc. to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission,
dated November 16, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \9\ provides that, after initiating
disapproval proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving
or disapproving the proposed rule change not later than 180 days after
the date of publication of notice of filing of the proposed rule
change. The Commission may extend the period for issuing an order
approving or disapproving the proposed rule change, however, by not
more than 60 days if the Commission determines that a longer period is
appropriate and publishes the reasons for such determination. The
proposed rule change was published for notice and comment in the
Federal Register on July 11, 2018. January 7, 2019 is 180 days from
that date, and March 8, 2019 is 240 days from that date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1. Accordingly, the
Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\10\ designates
March 8, 2019 as the date by which the Commission shall either approve
or disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1
(File No. SR-CboeBZX-2018-044).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-28379 Filed 12-28-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


OVERVIEW OF THE DOCKET FOR

 ADVANCED NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

IDENTIFICATION OF NON-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS THAT ARE SOLID WASTE

The docket for this Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM),
Docket No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329, contains the information that EPA is
using to support the ANPRM.  The documents in the docket are ordered so
that the key background documents (Materials Characterization Papers)
are grouped near the start of the docket list.  These papers summarize
key information that is available on the generation and use of various
non-hazardous secondary materials that are commonly used by the
industrial community as fuels and/or ingredients.  The materials papers,
which are cited throughout the ANPRM, cover the following materials.

Coal Combustion Products - Coal Fly Ash, Bottom Ash, and Boiler Slag

Biomass - Forest Derived Biomass and Pulp and Paper Residues

Biomass - Agricultural Residues and Food Scraps

Biomass - Animal Manure and Gaseous Fuels

Scrap Tires

Used Oil

Cement Kiln Dust (CKD)

Coal Refuse

Wastewater Treatment Sludge

Blast Furnace Slag - Used as ingredient in clinker manufacture

Construction and Demolition Materials - Building-related C&D Materials

Construction and Demolition Materials - Disaster Debris

Construction and Demolition Materials - Land Clearing Debris

Scrap Plastics

Secondary Glass Material - Used as ingredient in glass manufacture

Silica Fume - Used as ingredient in clinker manufacture

Spent Solvents and Related Materials

The docket is mainly comprised of the Material Characterization Papers
and the supporting documents referenced in these papers.  The references
cited in the Material Characterization papers may be found by searching
the docket for the name of the cited document.  The docket also contains
other references cited in the ANPRM, as well as a variety of
miscellaneous documents (e.g., meeting notes and materials submitted at
these meetings).


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33054-33056]
[FR Doc No: 2023-10942]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2023-0286]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Shrewsbury River, S-32 Bridge, Boroughs of Rumson
and Sea Bright, NJ

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a temporary safety
zone on the navigable waters of the Shrewsbury River, within a 100-yard
radius of the center point of the S-32 Bridge on County Route 520
(Rumson Road), in the boroughs of Rumson and Sea Bright, New Jersey.
The safety zone will include the East and West navigational channels
and will temporarily close down a portion of the Shrewsbury River under
the S-32 Bridge. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards associated
with the bridge construction. When enforced, entry of vessels or
persons into this zone during the enforcement periods is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port New York or a
designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 22, 2023.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2023-0286 using the Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email MST1 Melanie Hughes, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port New York
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On March 15, 2023, the Coast Guard received notification from WSP
USA Inc. requesting to close a portion of the Shrewsbury River for the
replacement of the S-32 Bridge on County Route 520 (Rumson Road) over
the Shrewsbury River in the Boroughs of Rumson and Sea Bright, NJ;
Federal Project No. STBGP-0520(300); NJDOT Job No. 6700352. Marine
construction actions will consist of several activities, including but
not limited: to erection of the bascule span structure steel;
counterweights; exodermic deck panels; cast-in-place concrete closure
pours; bridge concrete sidewalk; bridge steel railing; concrete deck
overlay; and fender system. These activities are expected to affect
navigation along the Shrewsbury River. Marine traffic will be
maintained through the channel with partial channel closures for a
majority of the duration of construction activities; however; full
channel closure will be required for very limited periods. The Captain
of the Port New York (COTP) has determined that potential hazards
associated with the bridge construction would be a safety concern for
anyone within a 100-yard radius of the center point of the bridge.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment from potential hazards created by the S-32
Bridge construction activities within a 100-yard radius. The Coast
Guard is proposing this rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP is proposing to establish a safety zone from September 25,
2023, through December 31, 2024, but will only be enforced during
periods when heavy lift operations at the new bridge are in progress.
    The first full channel closure is anticipated to take place from 6
a.m. on Monday, September 25, 2023, through 5 p.m. on Friday, September
29, 2023. The anticipated contingency date for this channel closure is
from 6 a.m. on Monday, October 2, 2023, through 5 p.m. on Friday,
October 6, 2023. The second full channel closure is anticipated to take
place from 6 a.m. on Monday, November 13, 2023, through 5 p.m. on
Friday, November 17, 2023. The anticipated contingency date for this
channel closure is from 6 a.m. on Monday, November 20, 2023, through 5
p.m. on Monday, November 27, 2023. The Federal navigation channel
closure is due to a 180-foot by 64-foot crane barge spudded down in the
channel while conducting heavy lift operations each week at the new
bridge.
    The remainder of the bridge construction activities will partially
close the channel allowing marine traffic to pass on either the east
half or the west half of the channel. During these partial closures,
the channel will be reduced to a width of 37 feet. The first partial
channel closure is anticipated to take place from 12:00 a.m. on Monday,
October 2, 2023, through 11:59 p.m. on Friday, November 10, 2023. The
second partial channel closure is anticipated to take place from 12
a.m. on Monday, November 20, 2023, through 11:59 p.m. on Friday, March
8, 2024. The third partial channel closure is anticipated to take place
from 12 a.m.

on Monday, March 11, 2024, through 11:59 p.m. on Thursday, May 16,
2024.
    The Coast Guard is proposing this rule remain effective through
December 31, 2024, in case the project is delayed due to unforeseen
circumstances. The safety zone would cover all navigable waters of the
Shrewsbury River within 100 yards of the center point of the S-32
Bridge. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of
personnel, vessels and these navigable waters during the bridge
construction. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative. Additional information concerning the Rumson-Sea Bright
S-32 Bridge Project can be found at https://www.rumsonseabrightbridge.com/.
    The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this
document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. A summary of our analyses
based on these statutes and Executive orders follows.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration and time-of-day of the safety zone. The safety zone
is only in effect for navigable waters of the Shrewsbury River within a
100-yard radius of the center point of the S-32 Bridge and associated
construction machinery conducting replacement. The Coast Guard will
notify the public of the enforcement of this rule through appropriate
means, which may include, but are not limited to, publication in the
Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM
marine channel 16.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of Government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federa l
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the potential effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves
establishing a safety zone on all navigable waters of the Shrewsbury
River, within a 100-yard radius of the center point of the S-32 Bridge,
on County Route 520 (Rumson Road) in the Boroughs of Rumson and Sea
Bright, New Jersey. It is categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph L60 (a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your

message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2023-0286 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
    Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. Also, if you click on the Dockets tab and then the
proposed rule, you should see a ``Subscribe'' option for email alerts.
The option will notify you when comments are posted, or a final rule is
published.
    We review all comments received, but we will only post comments
that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may choose not to post
off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive.
    Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T01-0286 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T01-0286  Safety Zone; Shrewsbury River, S-32 Bridge,
Boroughs of Rumson and Sea Bright, NJ.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of the Shrewsbury River, within a 100-yard radius of the center
point of the S-32 Bridge, County Route 520 (Rumson Road) in the
boroughs of Rumson and Sea Bright, New Jersey.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, Designated Representative
means a Coast Guard Officer, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty
officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal,
State, and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the
Port New York (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, no person or vessel may enter the safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP) or the COTP's designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative via VHF channel 16 or by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER> (Sector
New York Command Center). Those in the safety zone must comply with all
lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's
designated representative.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section is effective from September
25, 2023, through December 31, 2024, but will only be enforced during
periods when heavy lift operations at the new bridge are in progress.

    Dated: May 4, 2023.
Z. Merchant,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2023-10942 Filed 5-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 217 (Tuesday, November 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69770-69771]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28647]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Random Drug and Alcohol Testing Percentage Rates of Covered
Aviation Employees for the Period of January 1, 2016, Through December
31, 2016

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA has determined that the minimum random drug and
alcohol testing percentage rates for the period January 1, 2016,
through December 31, 2016, will remain at 25 percent of safety-
sensitive employees for random drug testing and 10 percent of safety-
sensitive employees for random alcohol testing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Vicky Dunne, Office of Aerospace
Medicine, Drug Abatement Division, Program Policy Branch (AAM-820),
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Room 806,

Washington, DC 20591; Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Discussion: Pursuant to 14 CFR 120.109(b), the FAA Administrator's
decision on whether to change the minimum annual random drug testing
rate is based on the reported random drug test positive rate for the
entire aviation industry. If the reported random drug test positive
rate is less than 1.00%, the Administrator may continue the minimum
random drug testing rate at 25%. In 2014, the random drug test positive
rate was 0.534%. Therefore, the minimum random drug testing rate will
remain at 25% for calendar year 2016.
    Similarly, 14 CFR 120.217(c), requires the decision on the minimum
annual random alcohol testing rate to be based on the random alcohol
test violation rate. If the violation rate remains less than 0.50%, the
Administrator may continue the minimum random alcohol testing rate at
10%. In 2014, the random alcohol test violation rate was 0.106%.
Therefore, the minimum random alcohol testing rate will remain at 10%
for calendar year 2016.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you have questions about how the annual
random testing percentage rates are determined please refer to the Code
of Federal Regulations Title 14, section 120.109(b) (for drug testing),
and 120.217(c) (for alcohol testing).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 29, 2015.
James R. Fraser,
Federal Air Surgeon.
[FR Doc. 2015-28647 Filed 11-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 236 (Friday, December 9, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 75462-75464]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26649]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0995; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-01365-T;
Amendment 39-22269; AD 2022-25-13]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-1A10 and BD-700-1A11 airplanes.
This AD was prompted by reports of the passenger door failing to dampen
during opening at regularly scheduled maintenance checks, causing the
door to open more rapidly than normal. An investigation found that a
contributing factor was erroneous aircraft maintenance manual (AMM)
procedures. This AD prohibits using certain versions of certain AMM
tasks for the passenger door. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective January 13, 2023.

ADDRESSES: AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov
under Docket No. FAA-2022-0995; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, the mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chirayu Gupta, Aerospace Engineer,
Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services Section, FAA, New York
ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Bombardier,
Inc., Model BD-700-1A10 and BD-700-1A11 airplanes. The NPRM published
in the Federal Register on August 12, 2022 (87 FR 49799). The NPRM was
prompted by AD CF-2021-41, dated November 24, 2021, issued by Transport
Canada, which is the aviation authority for Canada (referred to after
this as the MCAI). The MCAI states that there have been reports of the
passenger door failing to dampen during opening at regularly scheduled
maintenance checks, causing the door to open more rapidly than normal.
An investigation found that a contributing factor was erroneous AMM
procedures.
    In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to prohibit using certain versions of
certain AMM tasks for the passenger door. The FAA is issuing this AD to
prevent rapid opening of the passenger door, which can result in damage
to the door and consequent injury to maintenance personnel.
    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2022-0995.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive Comments

    The FAA received one comment from an individual. The following
presents the comment received on the NPRM and the FAA's response.

Request for Earlier Date of Compliance

    The commenter asked that the compliance time in the proposed AD be
changed to state that within 30 days, check to confirm that all the
tasks in figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD were not issued prior to
May 19, 2021, and make a logbook entry accordingly. The commenter
stated that the current compliance method seems rather odd. The
commenter asked if the compliance method means waiting until one of the
tasks in figure 1 is accomplished, and then making an aircraft logbook
entry that the task was not issued prior to May 19, 2021.
    The FAA agrees to clarify. The AMM tasks related to passenger door
maintenance have been corrected, and only versions of these tasks dated
May 19, 2021, or later have the correct procedures. Therefore, this AD
requires that maintenance tasks identified in figure 1 to paragraph (g)
of this AD must be done using versions issued on or after May 19, 2021.
This requirement remains in effect following the compliance time (30
days after the effective date of this AD), and compliance must be shown
for each occurrence. The FAA has not changed this AD in this regard.

Conclusion

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, it
has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the
comment received, and determined that air safety requires adopting this
AD as proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on this product. Except for minor editorial changes,
this AD is adopted as proposed in the NPRM. None of the changes will
increase the economic burden on any operator.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 408 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated costs for required actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                           Labor cost                               Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85................................              $0             $85         $34,680
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2022-25-13 Bombardier Inc.: Amendment 39-22269; Docket No. FAA-2022-
0995; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-01365-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective January 13, 2023.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-1A10 and BD-
700-1A11 airplanes, certificated in any category, serial numbers (S/
Ns) 9002 through 9998 inclusive, and S/Ns 60001 through 60045
inclusive.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 52, Doors.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of the passenger door failing to
dampen during opening at regularly scheduled maintenance checks,
causing the door to open more rapidly than normal. An investigation
found that a contributing factor was erroneous aircraft maintenance
manual (AMM) procedures. The FAA is issuing this AD to prevent rapid
opening of the passenger door, which can result in damage to the
door and consequent injury to maintenance personnel.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Maintenance or Inspection Program Task Restrictions

    As of 30 days after the effective date of this AD, when
performing the maintenance tasks identified in figure 1 to paragraph
(g) of this AD, do not use any version of any task identified in
figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD that was issued prior to May
19, 2021.

Figure 1 to paragraph (g)--AMM Tasks

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09DE22.132

(h) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If
sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the responsible Flight
Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada; or Bombardier, Inc.'s Transport
Canada Design Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO,
the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.

(i) Additional Information

    (1) Refer to Transport Canada AD CF-2021-41, dated November 24,
2021; for related information. This Transport Canada AD may be found
in the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2022-0995.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Chirayu Gupta,
Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services
Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    None.

    Issued on November 30, 2022.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-26649 Filed 12-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


EVALUATION OF VALUATION TREATMENT OF REATMENT BULK ULK ELEMENTAL LEMENTAL MERCURY ERCURY Appendix C. Characterization Data, Technical Background Document: Mercury Wastes, Evaluation of Treatment of Bulk Elemental Mercury, Final Report February 8, 2002 Submitted to:

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Building Office of Solid Waste 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. Washington, D. C. 20460 Submitted by:

Science Applications International Corporation Engineering and Environmental Management Group 11251 Roger Bacon Drive Reston, Virginia 20190 EPA Contract No. 68 W 98 025 Work Assignment No. 3 8 SAIC Project No. 06 0758 08 1373 000 CHARACTERIZATION HARACTERIZATION DATA ATA C 2 APPENDIX C. CHARACTERIZATION DATA Surrogate Vendor pH1 OM (%) Potassium ( ppm) Calcium ( ppm) Magnesium ( ppm) Sodium ( ppm) AE pH2 CEC ( meq/ 100 g) Sand (%) Memo ALTER Raw Surrogate 1.7 0.55 15 1 20 19,392 2.47 128.8 19.3 1.6 0.13 15 1 20 18,786 2.40 127.0 18.8 duplicate A Raw Surrogate 1.9 0.35 64 210 110 28,886 2.48 171.9 50.4 1.9 0.12 61 170 90 28,886 2.50 171.3 6.8 duplicate B Raw Surrogate 1.3 0.11 65 210 120 25,452 2.20 159.4 1.8 1.4 0.14 51 150 90 22,826 2.30 146.4 2.0 duplicate C Raw Surrogate 1.8 0.42 35 390 2,660 24,038 2.79 170.4 3.0 1.8 0.52 39 470 3,570 28,886 2.80 199.8 9.2 duplicate D Raw Surrogate 1.5 0.19 184 170 140 17,574 2.33 124.3 2.4 1.6 0.12 149 120 120 19,493 2.40 131.7 4.2 duplicate A Monolith 7.2 3.56 101 80 1 21,513 8.00 94.2 80.6 6.9 2.46 202 47 10 48,682 7.90 213.3 78.9 duplicate A Pellets 7.0 3.84 101 6 1 17,271 8.00 75.4 83.0 7.1 3.93 101 56 1 20,099 8.00 87.9 78.6 duplicate B Phase I 6.4 0.71 303 21,200 20 37,875 7.30 277.2 37.3 6.4 0.55 303 22,400 20 39,390 7.30 289.8 40.0 duplicate B Phase I 6.2 0.87 202 22,800 600 36,662 7.30 284.5 34.3 6.0 0.57 404 22,300 120 40,097 7.20 294.3 37.6 duplicate B Phase II 6.4 8.39 202 18,300 6 15,453 7.30 164.9 60.0 6.4 8.45 202 19,700 7 46,157 7.40 304.6 60.6 duplicate C Batch 1 8.9 2.27 808 900 8,120 95,041 487.5 28.3 9.0 1.20 303 700 8,300 103,626 524.0 28.5 duplicate C Batch 2 9.0 1.18 202 600 10,700 53,631 325.9 26.2 9.0 2.40 303 700 11,320 75,548 427.1 26.3 duplicate C Batch 3 8.8 2.12 303 3,200 820 8,484 60.5 77.2 8.0 2.40 202 3,700 30 7,171 50.4 75.5 duplicate D Batch 1 9.7 1.49 1,616 19,300 180 34,643 252.8 73.5 9.9 2.44 1,313 20,700 60 28,280 230.3 69.8 duplicate D Batch 2 9.6 1.53 1,515 19,800 90 31,815 242.0 71.2 9.9 2.51 1,313 21,200 380 28,886 238.1 70.4 duplicate EVALUATION OF VALUATION TREATMENT OF REATMENT BULK ULK ELEMENTAL LEMENTAL MERCURY ERCURY Surrogate ( Continued)

Vendor Silt (%) Clay (%) Textural Classification Redox Potential ( mv)@ 20 E C Bulk Density ( g/ cc) Infiltration Rate ( cm/ hr) Chloride ( ppm) CEC by Na 1/ 3 Bar3 Memo ALTER Raw Surrogate 65.3 15.4 Silt Loam 543.5 0.63 0.46 55,440 51.7 29.5 Silty Clay Loam 515.8 0.56 1.08 58,240 duplicate A Raw Surrogate 22.8 26.8 Sandy Clay Loam 521.5 0.76 0.16 99,400 77.6 15.6 Silt Loam 526.3 0.69 0.13 91,560 81.8 duplicate B Raw Surrogate 79.9 18.3 Silt Loam 553.8 0.64 0.05 103,580 79.5 80.4 17.6 Silt Loam 541.5 0.64 0.04 91,560 95.8 duplicate C Raw Surrogate 74.8 22.2 Silt Loam 584.5 0.68 0.02 91,560 93.8 68.5 22.3 Silt Loam 583.2 0.67 0.05 103,580 duplicate D Raw Surrogate 67.3 30.3 Silty Clay Loam 578.3 0.59 0.08 68,660 81.4 14.4 Silt Loam 590.0 0.50 0.12 58,340 91.6 duplicate A Monolith 7.6 11.8 Sandy Loam   29.9 1.15 10.12 24,760 11.4 106.5 9.9 11.2 Sandy Loam   60.0 1.17 3.99 20,820 8.4 26.4 duplicate A Pellets 3.6 13.4 Sandy Loam   30.5 1.15 48.41 20,400 5.9 21.9 11.3 10.1 Sandy Loam   51.9 1.16 1.45 23,560 5.3 27.6 duplicate B Phase I 47.3 15.4 Loam 58.6 0.65 1.07 50,220 11.6 19.1 45.7 14.3 Loam 61.9 0.64 47,420 11.1 111.8 duplicate B Phase I 54.3 11.4 Silt Loam 118.7 0.66 2.72 47,420 10.5 93.1 51.1 11.3 Silt Loam 122.9 0.64 1.55 49,400 10.7 91.8 duplicate B Phase II 29.0 11.0 Sandy Loam 87.1 0.78 1.84 55,900 10.3 85.7 30.4 9.0 Sandy Loam 78.5 0.81 0.79 60,680 10.3 73.3 duplicate C Batch 1 49.7 22.0 Loam 27.8 0.68 0.26 50,860 17.2 71.4 51.5 20.0 Silt Loam NA4 0.69 NA4 NA4 84.2 duplicate C Batch 2 51.8 22.0 Silt Loam 7.9 0.72 0.47 53,420 18.5 52.3 21.4 Silt Loam   108.5 0.71 47,420 14.3 82.2 duplicate C Batch 3 9.8 13.0 Sandy Loam 128.0 1.27 0.25 7,860 9.8 69.8 15.3 9.2 Sandy Loam 208.3 1.30 4,020 8.7 24.2 duplicate D Batch 1 18.7 7.8 Sandy Loam   24.1 0.49 4.13 29,800 68.7 19.9 22.6 7.6 Sandy Loam NA4 0.54 NA4 NA4 165.1 duplicate D Batch 2 22.0 6.8 Sandy Loam   36.3 0.49 2.15 28,240 67.4 22.4 7.2 Sandy Loam   93.8 0.58 40,220 62.4 159.3 duplicate 1 pH measured according to AGVISE SOP: NUT. 02.05.08. 2 AE pH measured according to AGVISE SOP: NUT. 02.11.09, using the Adam Evans method to determine the acidity of a solid sample. 3 Water holding capacity: the % water at ½ bar. 4 Duplicate not run due to low waste volume. CHARACTERIZATION HARACTERIZATION DATA ATA C 4 Elemental Mercury Vendor pH1 OM (%) Potassium ( ppm) Calcium ( ppm) Magnesium ( ppm) Sodium ( ppm) AE pH2 CEC ( meq/ 100 gm) Sand (%) Memo A Elemental Monolith 11.0 2.75 101 1 1 18,483 80.6 73.9 11.0 2.74 101 1 1 15,958 69.7 72.0 duplicate A Elemental Pellets 11.0 3.11 101 46 1 10,100 44.4 77.6 11.0 2.70 101 200 10 15,453 68.5 79.0 duplicate B Elemental Phase I 8.1 0.79 202 9,000 230 1,515 54.0 31.6 8.1 0.68 202 9,100 240 1,212 53.3 31.0 duplicate B Elemental Phase II 7.0 4.81 303 7,300 50 1,313 8.0 43.4 74.6 6.9 4.88 202 7,400 40 1,313 7.9 44.4 75.3 duplicate C Elemental 9.9 0.725 202 200 8,180 17,271 144.8 79.9 10.0 1.91 202 200 8,500 31,329 208.6 83.3 duplicate Elemental Mercury Vendor Silt (%) Clay (%) Textural Classification Redox Potential mv@ 20 E C Bulk Density ( g/ cc) Infiltration Rate ( cm/ hr) Chloride ( ppm) CEC by Na 1/ 3 Bar3 Memo A Elemental Monolith 24.7 1.4 Loamy Sand   459.6 1.48 2.03 1,240 0.7 14.9 28.0 0.0 Loamy Sand   453.7 1.46 0.30 3,400 0.4 14.7 duplicate A Elemental Pellets 19.8 2.6 Loamy Sand   466.1 1.41 0.70 1,000 1.2 13.2 20.8 0.2 Loamy Sand   468.1 1.51 0.79 1,240 0.7 9.2 duplicate B Elemental Phase I 66.0 2.4 Silt Loam   82.3 2.10 0.19 900 2.4 13.6 61.6 7.4 Silt Loam   51.9 2.11 0.17 1,100 2.3 14.8 duplicate B Elemental Phase II 20.2 5.2 Sandy Loam   28.3 1.69 1.45 300 3.5 21.7 21.3 3.4 Loamy Sand   12.3 1.69 2.76 280 3.6 20.3 duplicate C Elemental 12.9 7.2 Loamy Sand   651.1 2.64 0.66 440 3.2 18.1 16.1 0.6 Loamy Sand   851.0 2.56 0.54 460 3.2 21.2 duplicate 1 pH measured according to AGVISE SOP: NUT. 02.05.08. 2 AE pH measured according to AGVISE SOP: NUT. 02.11.09, using the Adam Evans method to determine the acidity of a solid sample. 3 Water holding capacity: the % water at ½ bar. EVALUATION OF VALUATION TREATMENT OF REATMENT BULK ULK ELEMENTAL LEMENTAL MERCURY ERCURY This page intentionally left blank.


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 134 (Monday, July 14, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40690-40691]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16349]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 134 / Monday, July 14, 2014 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0263; Airspace Docket No. 13-ASW-27]

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Thomas, OK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E airspace at Thomas,
OK. Controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate new Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) at Thomas Muni Airport. The FAA
is taking this action to enhance the safety and management of
Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations for SIAPs at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 28, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001. You
must identify the docket number FAA-2014-0263/Airspace Docket No. 13-
ASW-27, at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments
through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the
public docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any
final disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket
Office (telephone 1-800-647-5527), is on the ground floor of the
building at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raul Garza, Jr., Central Service
Center, Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone:
817-321-7654.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2014-0263/
Airspace Docket No. 13-ASW-27.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov airports--airtraffic/air--traffic/publications/airspace--
amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Central Service Center, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking<PHONE_NUMBER> to
request a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    This action proposes to amend Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR), Part 71 by establishing Class E airspace extending upward
from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile radius of Thomas Muni
Airport, Thomas, OK, to accommodate new standard instrument approach
procedures. Controlled airspace is needed for the safety and management
of IFR operations at the airport.
    Class E airspace areas are published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9X, dated August 7, 2013 and effective September 15, 2013, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designation listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106 describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would establish controlled airspace at Thomas Muni Airport,
Thomas, OK.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9X,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 7, 2013 and
effective September 15, 2013, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ASW OK E5 Thomas, OK [New]

Thomas Muni Airport, OK
    (Lat. 35[deg]44'01'' N., long. 98[deg]43'50'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of Thomas Muni Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on June 30, 2014.
Walter Tweedy,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2014-16349 Filed 7-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P