[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43545-43547]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18145]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0724; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-043-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) that applies to certain Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 series
airplanes. The existing AD currently requires a modification to trim
the edge of the bumper plate, including performing an inspection for
damage or cracks of the bumper plate and base fitting, and replacing
any damaged or cracked part. That AD also currently requires, for
certain airplanes, reidentifying the bumper plate. Since we issued that
AD, we have determined that an operational check must be done after
reidentifying the bumper plate to ensure the identified unsafe
condition is addressed. This proposed AD would require, for airplanes
on which the reidentification is done, an operational check of the
alternate extension system of the main landing gear (MLG), and repair
if necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct failure of
the MLG to extend and lock, which could adversely affect the safe
landing of the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 10,
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard,
Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 416-375-
4539; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0724;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-043-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each

substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On July 29, 2011, we issued AD 2011-17-04, Amendment 39-16768 (76
FR 50403, August 15, 2011). That AD required actions intended to
address an unsafe condition on certain Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-
400, -401, and -402 airplanes.
    Since we issued AD 2011-17-04, Amendment 39-16768 (76 FR 50403,
August 15, 2011), we have determined that an operational check must be
done after reidentifying the bumper plate to ensure the identified
unsafe condition is addressed. This action is also included in Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF-2010-23, dated July 21, 2010 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''). The MCAI states:

    One in-service incident has been reported on [a] DHC-8 Series
400 aeroplane in which the right hand main landing gear (MLG) failed
to extend using the alternate gear extension system. Investigation
determined that the tread on the outboard tire was catching on the
bumper plate located on the outboard MLG door that prevented the MLG
door to open following an extension attempt via the alternate
extension system. Failure of [the] MLG to extend and lock could
adversely affect the safe landing of the aeroplane.
    To prevent the potential jam condition between the bumper plate
and the MLG tires, Bombardier Aerospace has developed a modification
to trim the edge of the bumper plate to eliminate the possibility of
interference [Bombardier Modsum 4-113645].

The Modsum includes performing a detailed visual inspection for damage
or cracks of the bumper plate and base fitting and replacing any
damaged or cracked part with a new part, if necessary. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 65 products of U.S. registry.
    The actions that are required by AD 2011-17-04, Amendment 39-16768
(76 FR 50403, August 15, 2011), and retained in this proposed AD take
about 8 work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per
work hour. Required parts would cost about $479 per product. Where the
service information lists required parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these costs.
As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some
parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, the cost of the currently required actions is $1,159 per
product.
    We estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $5,525, or $85 per
product.
    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
a cost estimate for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing airworthiness directive
(AD) 2011-17-04, Amendment 39-16768 (76 FR 50403, August 15, 2011), and
adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2012-0724; Directorate Identifier
2012-NM-043-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by September 10, 2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes AD 2011-17-04, Amendment 39-16768 (76 FR
50403, August 15, 2011).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400, -401, and -
402 airplanes, certificated in any category, having serial numbers
4001 through 4247 inclusive.

(d) Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
Gear.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by one in-service incident reported on a
DHC-8-400 airplane in which the right hand main landing gear

(MLG) failed to extend using the alternate gear extension system. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct failure of the MLG to
extend and lock, which could adversely affect the safe landing of
the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Retained Actions for All Airplanes

    Within 2,000 flight hours after September 19, 2011 (the
effective date of AD 2011-17-04, Amendment 39-16768 (76 FR 50403,
August 15, 2011): Incorporate Bombardier Modsum 4-113645, including
performing a detailed visual inspection for damage or cracks of the
bumper plate and base fitting and replacing any damaged or cracked
part, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-74, Revision A, dated May 17,
2010. Do all applicable replacements before further flight.

    Note 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD:  Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84-32-74, Revision A, dated May 17, 2010, includes an
operational check of the alternate extension system of the MLG. If
the operational check fails, guidance on doing corrective actions
can be found in the Bombardier Q400 Dash 8 Aircraft Maintenance
Manual.

(h) Retained Actions for Airplanes Having Certain Bumper Plates

    For airplanes on which a bumper plate having part number
85424082-101 or 85424082-103 is installed on which the rework
specified in Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-54-553 has been done:
Within 1,000 flight hours after September 19, 2011 (the effective
date of AD 2011-17-04, Amendment 39-16768 (76 FR 50403, August 15,
2011), reidentify the bumper plate, in accordance with paragraph
3.B., step (8) of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-32-74, Revision A, dated May 17, 2010.

(i) Retained Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for the modification required by
paragraph (h) of this AD by incorporation of Bombardier Modsum 4-
113645 before September 19, 2011 (the effective date of AD 2011-17-
04, Amendment 39-16768 (76 FR 50403, August 15, 2011), if the
modification was performed using Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-
74, dated December 23, 2009; and provided the modification is done
within the compliance time specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.

(j) New Requirements of This AD: Operational Check for Airplanes on
Which the Action Required by Paragraph (h) Is Done

    Concurrently with doing the actions required by paragraph (h) of
this AD, or within 30 days after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later: Perform an operational check of the
alternate extension system of the MLG, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-74,
Revision A, dated May 17, 2010. If the operational check fails,
before further flight, repair in accordance with a method approved
by either the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA; or the Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) (or its delegated
agent).

    Note 2 to paragraph (j) of this AD: If the operational check
fails, guidance on doing the repair can be found in the Bombardier
Q400 Dash 8 Aircraft Maintenance Manual.

(k) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD, provided the operational check specified in
paragraph (j) of this AD is done within the compliance time
specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, or within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, using Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-32-74, dated December 23, 2009.

(l) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO, ANE-170, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the New York ACO, send it to
ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York
ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York, 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved
AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a
principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards
district office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(m) Related Information

    (1) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2010-23,
dated July 21, 2010; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-74,
Revision A, dated May 17, 2010; for related information.
    (2) For service information identified in this proposed AD,
contact Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt
Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet
http://www.bombardier.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 17, 2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-18145 Filed 7-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 193 (Thursday, October 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60738-60741]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24493]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-67946; File No. SR-CBOE-2012-080]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fees Schedule

 September 28, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on September 18, 2012, Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change
as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's
Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to revamp the appearance of its Fees Schedule
in order to make it easier for investors to read and determine which
fees are applicable to the variety of transactions available on CBOE.
No substantive changes to the Fees Schedule, or any Exchange fees, are
being made. All information that is proposed to appear in the new
version of the Fees Schedule (the ``New Fees Schedule'') already
appears in one form or another on the Exchange's previous version of
the Fees Schedule (the ``Old Fees Schedule'').
    In conjunction with this proposed re-organization of the Fees
Schedule, some items are being moved within the Fees Schedule and
clarifications are being given. Currently, broker-dealer transaction
fees apply to, among others, the orders of non-Trading Permit Holder
market-makers.\3\ However, this is currently only explained in Footnote
(16), and therefore in Section 1 of the Old Fees Schedule, which lists
the actual transaction fees, there is no separate listing of fees for
non-Trading Permit Holder market-makers (only broker dealers). The
proposed new transaction fees chart lists out non-Trading Permit Holder
market-maker transaction fees separate from broker-dealer transaction
fees (the amounts of the fees will remain the same) in order to make it
easier for non-Trading Permit Holder market-makers to know which
transaction fees apply to them. Because non-Trading Permit Holder
market-maker fees will now be listed separately from broker-dealer fees
(even though the amounts of the fees are the same), Footnotes (13),
(19), and (20), which all state that they apply to broker-dealers, are
now being amended to clarify that they apply to non-Trading Permit
Holder market-makers as well (just as they did prior to this proposed
change). The statement in Footnote (16) that ``Broker-Dealer
transaction fees apply to * * * non-Trading Permit Holder market-maker
orders'' is not being changed, as while the fees for non-Trading Permit
Holder market-maker orders are now listed separately, the amounts of
such fees are not changing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See CBOE Fees Schedule, Footnote (16).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes adding origin codes into the New Fees
Schedule. Origin codes are used on each order sent to the Exchange to
denote the type of market participant sending the order.\4\ Because
these origin codes are affixed to orders sent to the Exchange by market
participants, the Exchange proposes adding them to the New Fees
Schedule in order to more easily determine which fees correspond to
orders originating from these different market participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See CBOE Regulatory Circular RG12-057 (April 26, 2012) for a
list of all CBOE origin codes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In SR-CBOE-2012-075, the Exchange proposed to change references in
its Fees Schedule to options on the PowerShares QQQ Trust, whose ticker
symbol changed from QQQQ to QQQ.\5\ However, in that rule filing, the
Exchange failed to change a reference to QQQQ in the Fees Schedule's
section entitled Trading Permit Holder Transaction Fee Policies and
Rebate Programs--Trading Permit Holder Transaction Fees--Equity and
Index Options. The Exchange hereby proposes to change that reference
from QQQQ to QQQ.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67557 (August 1,
2012), 77 FR 47148 (August 7, 2012) (SR-CBOE-2012-075).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In re-organizing the Fees Schedule, the Exchange added Footnotes
(21)-(27) to the New Fees Schedule. The text of these Footnotes was
transferred from various sections within the Old Fees Schedule.
Footnote (21) of the New Fees Schedule is composed of text from Section
7 of the Old Fees Schedule. Footnote (22) of the New Fees Schedule is
composed of text from the Clearing Trading Permit Holder Fee Cap in All
Products Except SPX, VIX or Other Volatility Indexes, OEX or XEO
portion of Section 1 of the Old Fees Schedule. Footnote (23) of the New
Fees Schedule is composed of text from the CBOE Proprietary Products
Sliding Scale portion of Section 1 of the Old Fees Schedule. Footnote
(24) of the New Fees Schedule is composed of text from Section 10(A)(i)
of the Old Fees Schedule. Footnote (25) of the New Fees Schedule is
composed of text from Section 10(A)(iv) of the Old Fees Schedule.
Footnote (26) of the New Fees Schedule is composed of text from the
portion of Section 10(A) entitled ``Assessment of Trading Permit and
Tier Appointment Fees'' of the Old Fees Schedule. Footnote (27) of the
New Fees Schedule is composed of text from Section 18 of the Old Fees
Schedule.
    Other changes were made to references within the Footnotes.
Footnote (2) previously said ``Please see item 18 for details of
Customer Large Trade Discounts.'' However, there is no longer an ``item
18'' but instead just a separate table regarding Customer Large Trade
Discounts, and a new Footnote (27) with details of Customer Large Trade
Discounts, so Footnote (2) now says ``Please see Customer Large Trade
Discounts table and footnote 27 for details of Customer Large Trade
Discounts'' instead. Footnote (3) previously stated that ``Trading
Permit Holder transaction fee policies and rebate programs are
described in the last section.'' However, this is no longer true, as
the sections have been moved around, and there is now a table regarding
Trading Permit Holder transaction fee policies and rebate programs.
Instead, Footnote (3) now says ``Trading Permit Holder transaction fee
policies and rebate programs are described in the Trading Permit Holder
Transaction Fee Policies and Rebate Programs Table.''
    In both of the Index Options Rate Tables in the New Fees Schedule,
the ``QCC'' field is blacked out. This is because a QCC (qualified
contingent cross) trade cannot be made on a cash-settled index (for
QCCs, options must be tied to a physically deliverable Regulation NMS
security). The Old Fees Schedule listed possible fees for QCCs because
the section on index options fees also included fees for exchange-
traded funds (``ETFs''), on which QCCs can be executed. Because the New
Fees Schedule has separate tables for index options and ETFs, the Index
Options Rate Tables in the New Fees Schedule has the ``QCC'' field
blacked out.
    The Old Fees Schedule lists the AIM Agency/Primary fee and the AIM
Contra Execution fee in the section that lists

index options because that section includes fees for proprietary and
non-proprietary index options (as well as other products, including
ETFs). The only proprietary index option class on which AIM (the
Exchange's Automated Improvement Mechanism) is available is VIX
options. Therefore, since the New Fees Schedule has a separate table
for proprietary index options (the Proprietary Index Options Rate
Table), the listing in that table for the AIM Agency/Primary fee and
the AIM Contra Execution fee clarifies that it only applies to VIX
options.
    Professionals and Voluntary Professionals are billed in SPX as
Customers because SPX is the only class that trades on the Exchange's
Hybrid 3.0 platform, and the classifications as a Professional and
Voluntary Professional do not have applicability in Hybrid 3.0 classes.
As such, in the Old Fees Schedule, there were no fees listed for
Professional and Voluntary Professional SPX trades. The New Fees
Schedule, however, lists the SPX fees for Professional and Voluntary
Professional (with such fees being the same as Customer SPX fees, both
for trades above and below $1) in order to clarify the fees for
Professional and Voluntary Professional SPX trades. There is no change
occurring in the amounts of the fees for Professional and Voluntary
Professional SPX trades (or anywhere else in this proposed rule
change).
    In the Old Fees Schedule, there are no separate listings for VIX
options transactions; as a Volatility Index, VIX is simply included by
implication in the listings of fees for Volatility Indexes. The
Proprietary Index Options Rate Table in the New Fees Schedule lists VIX
options fees separately to make VIX options fees more clearly apparent;
the amounts of the fees for VIX options transactions are not changing
and will still be the same as those for Volatility Indexes.
    In the Old Fees Schedule, Customer fees for transactions in SPX
Weeklys (``SPXW'') are not separately spelled out, as SPXW falls within
the universe of SPX transactions. However, because SPXW is a product
that has experienced a growth in trading volume, the Exchange proposes
to separately list the fees for SPXW Customer transactions as well as
the Surcharge Fee. The amount of the fees for SPXW Customer
transactions and the Surcharge Fee is not changing.
    The Exchange has made a universal change to the New Fees Schedule
to remove any references in the Old Fees Schedule to fees being listed
in a ``table below'' or similar language when such language no longer
applies (i.e. the table is no longer below).
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\6\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \7\ requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts, to remove
impediments to and to perfect the mechanism for a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest. In organizing the Fees Schedule in charts that are
easy for investors to read and grouping together fees that apply to
certain market participants into the same subsections and charts, the
Exchange eliminates confusion regarding fees, thereby removing
impediments to and to perfecting the mechanism for a free and open
market, and, in general, protecting investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) \8\ of the Act and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \9\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2012-080 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2012-080. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2012-080, and should be
submitted on or before October 25, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-24493 Filed 10-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18163-18166]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06276]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2023-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2326]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Federal
Regulations. The currently effective community number is shown in the
table below and must be used for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will be finalized on the dates
listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS report in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Chief executive officer of                                       Online location of letter of map                               Community
     State and county       Location and case No.             community                 Community map repository                   revision                  Date of modification        No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona:
    Maricopa.............  City of Scottsdale 22-  The Honorable David Ortega,      Planning Records, 7447 East      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 9, 2023............       045012
                            09-1364P).              Mayor, City of Scottsdale,       Indian School Road, Suite 100,   advanceSearch.
                                                    3939 North Drinkwater            Scottsdale, AZ 85251.
                                                    Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ
                                                    85251.
    Maricopa.............  Unincorporated Areas    The Honorable Clint L. Hickman,  Flood Control District of        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jul. 7, 2023............       040037
                            of Maricopa County      Chair, Board of Supervisors,     Maricopa County, 2801 West       advanceSearch.
                            (22-09-1193P).          Maricopa County, 301 West        Durango Street, Phoenix, AZ
                                                    Jefferson Street, 10th Floor,    85009.
                                                    Phoenix, AZ 85003.
California:
    Nevada...............  City of Grass Valley    The Honorable Ben Aguilar,       Public Works Department, 125     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          May 31, 2023............       060211
                            (22-09-1769X).          Mayor, City of Grass Valley,     East Main Street, Grass          advanceSearch.
                                                    125 East Main Street, Grass      Valley, CA 95945.
                                                    Valley, CA 95945.

    Nevada...............  Town of Truckee (22-09- The Honorable Lindsay Romack,    Eric W. Rood Administrative      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 12, 2023...........       060762
                            0327P).                 Mayor, Town of Truckee, 10183    Center, 950 Maidu Avenue,        advanceSearch.
                                                    Truckee Airport Road, Truckee,   Nevada City, CA 95959.
                                                    CA 96161.
    Riverside............  City of Corona (22-09-  The Honorable Tony Daddario,     City Hall, 400 South Vicentia    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 5, 2023............       060250
                            1326P).                 Mayor, City of Corona, 400       Avenue, Corona, CA 92882.        advanceSearch.
                                                    South Vicentia Avenue, Corona,
                                                    CA 92882.
    Riverside............  City of Corona (22-09-  The Honorable Tony Daddario,     City Hall, 400 South Vicentia    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jul. 10, 2023...........       060250
                            1747P).                 Mayor, City of Corona, 400       Avenue, Corona, CA 92882.        advanceSearch.
                                                    South Vicentia Avenue, Corona,
                                                    CA 92882.
    Riverside............  City of Menifee (22-09- The Honorable Bill Zimmerman,    Public Works and Engineering     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 15, 2023...........       060176
                            0396P).                 Mayor, City of Menifee, 29844    Department, 29714 Haun Road,     advanceSearch.
                                                    Haun Road, Menifee, CA 92586.    Menifee, CA 92586.
    Riverside............  City of Menifee (22-09- The Honorable Bill Zimmerman,    Public Works and Engineering     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 30, 2023...........       060176
                            1027P).                 Mayor, City of Menifee, 29844    Department, 29714 Haun Road,     advanceSearch.
                                                    Haun Road, Menifee, CA 92586.    Menifee, CA 92586.
    Riverside............  City of Moreno Valley   The Honorable Ulises Cabrera,    Public Works Department, 14177   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jul. 10, 2023...........       065074
                            (22-09-0975P).          Mayor, City of Moreno Valley,    Frederick Street, Moreno         advanceSearch.
                                                    14177 Frederick Street, Moreno   Valley, CA 92552.
                                                    Valley, CA 92553.
    Riverside............  Unincorporated Areas    The Honorable Kevin Jeffries,    Riverside County, Flood Control  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 16, 2023...........       060245
                            of Riverside County     Chair, Board of Supervisors      and Water Conservation           advanceSearch.
                            (22-09-0281P).          Riverside County, 4080 Lemon     District, 1995 Market Street,
                                                    Street, 5th Floor, Riverside,    Riverside, CA 92501.
                                                    CA 92501.
    Riverside............  Unincorporated Areas    The Honorable Kevin Jeffries,    Riverside County, Flood Control  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 15, 2023...........       060245
                            of Riverside County     Chair, Board of Supervisors      and Water Conservation           advanceSearch.
                            (22-09-0396P).          Riverside County, 4080 Lemon     District, 1995 Market Street,
                                                    Street, 5th Floor, Riverside,    Riverside, CA 92501.
                                                    CA 92501.
    Riverside............  Unincorporated Areas    The Honorable Kevin Jeffries,    Riverside County, Flood Control  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 30, 2023...........       060245
                            of Riverside County     Chair, Board of Supervisors      and Water Conservation           advanceSearch.
                            (22-09-1027P).          Riverside County, 4080 Lemon     District, 1995 Market Street,
                                                    Street, 5th Floor, Riverside,    Riverside, CA 92501.
                                                    CA 92501.
    Riverside............  Unincorporated Areas    The Honorable Kevin Jeffries,    Riverside County, Flood Control  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jul. 10, 2023...........       060245
                            of Riverside County,    Chair, Board of Supervisors      and Water Conservation           advanceSearch.
                            (22-09-1747P).          Riverside County, 4080 Lemon     District, 1995 Market Street,
                                                    Street, 5th Floor, Riverside,    Riverside, CA 92501.
                                                    CA 92501.
    San Diego............  City of San Marcos (22- The Honorable Rebecca Jones,     City Hall, 1 Civic Center        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jul. 5, 2023............       060296
                            09-1048P).              Mayor, City of San Marcos, 1     Drive, San Marcos, CA 92069.     advanceSearch.
                                                    Civic Center Drive, San
                                                    Marcos, CA 92069.
Florida: Nassau..........  Unincorporated Areas    Taco Pope, County Manager,       Nassau County Building           https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 22, 2023...........       120170
                            of Nassau County (22-   Nassau County, County            Department, 96161 Nassau         advanceSearch.
                            04-3256P).              Manager's Office, 96135 Nassau   Place, Yulee, FL 32097.
                                                    Place, Suite 1, Yulee, FL
                                                    32097.
Idaho: Canyon............  City of Caldwell (22-   The Honorable Jarom Wagoner,     City Hall, 621 Cleveland         https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jul. 3, 2023............       160036
                            10-0547P).              Mayor, City of Caldwell, City    Boulevard, 2nd Floor,            advanceSearch.
                                                    Hall, 411 Blaine Street,         Caldwell, ID 83605.
                                                    Caldwell, ID 83605.
Illinois:
    Cook.................  City of Calumet City    The Honorable Thaddeus M.        City Hall, 204 Pulaski Road,     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 29, 2023...........       170072
                            (22-05-1085P).          Jones, Mayor, City of Calumet    Calumet City, IL 60409.          advanceSearch.
                                                    City, 204 Pulaski Road,
                                                    Calumet City, IL 60409.

    Cook.................  Village of South        The Honorable Don A. De Graff,   Planning & Development           https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 29, 2023...........       170163
                            Holland (22-05-         Mayor, Village of South          Department, 16226 Wausau         advanceSearch.
                            1085P).                 Holland, Village Hall, 16226     Avenue, South Holland, IL
                                                    Wausau Avenue, South Holland,    60473.
                                                    IL 60473.
    Will.................  City of Naperville (22- The Honorable Steve Chirico,     Municipal Center, 400 South      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 29, 2023...........       170213
                            05-3407P).              Mayor, City of Naperville,       Eagle Street, Naperville, IL     advanceSearch.
                                                    Municipal Center, 400 South      60540.
                                                    Eagle Street, Naperville, IL
                                                    60540.
Indiana:
    Monroe...............  City of Bloomington     The Honorable John Hamilton,     Planning Department, 401 North   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jul. 5, 2023............       180169
                            (22-05-1490P).          Mayor, City of Bloomington,      Morton Street, Bloomington, IN   advanceSearch.
                                                    401 North Morton Street, Suite   47402.
                                                    210, Bloomington, IN 47404.
    Monroe...............  Unincorporated Areas    Julie Thomas, Commissioner--     Monroe County Courthouse, 100    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jul. 5, 2023............       180444
                            of Monroe County (22-   District 2, Monroe County        West Kirkwood Avenue, Room       advanceSearch.
                            05-1490P).              Board of Commissioners, Monroe   306, Bloomington, IN 47404.
                                                    County Courthouse, 100 West
                                                    Kirkwood Avenue, Bloomington,
                                                    IN 47404.
Minnesota:
    Hennepin.............  City of Plymouth (22-   The Honorable Jeffry Wosje,      City Hall, 3400 Plymouth         https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 30, 2023...........       270179
                            05-2089P).              Mayor, City of Plymouth, 3400    Boulevard, Plymouth, MN 55447.   advanceSearch.
                                                    Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth,
                                                    MN 55447.
    Wabasha..............  City of Mazeppa (22-05- The Honorable Chris Hagfors,     City Hall, 1st and Maple         https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 15, 2023...........       270487
                            2195P).                 Mayor, City of Mazeppa, 121      Streets, Mazeppa, MN 55957.      advanceSearch.
                                                    Maple Street, Mazeppa, MN
                                                    55956.
Nebraska:
    Lancaster............  City of Lincoln (22-07- The Honorable Leirion Gaylor     Building & Safety Department,    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          May 23, 2023............       315273
                            0708P).                 Baird, Mayor, City of Lincoln,   555 South 10th Street,           advanceSearch.
                                                    555 South 10th Street,           Lincoln, NE 68508.
                                                    Lincoln, NE 68508.
    Lancaster............  Unincorporated Areas    Chair Deb Schorr, Lancaster      Lancaster County Building &      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          May 23, 2023............       310134
                            of Lancaster County     County Board of Commissioners,   Safety Department, 555 South     advanceSearch.
                            (22-07-0708P).          555 South 10th Street, Room      10th Street, Lincoln, NE
                                                    110, Lincoln, NE 68508.          68508.
Nevada: Clark............  City of Henderson (22-  The Honorable Michelle Romero,   Public Works Department, 240     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 8, 2023............       320005
                            09-1370P).              Mayor, City of Henderson, City   South Water Street, Henderson,   advanceSearch.
                                                    Hall, 240 South Water Street,    NV 89015.
                                                    Henderson, NV 89015.
Ohio:
    Fairfield............  City of Pickerington    The Honorable Lee A. Gary,       City Hall, 51 East Columbus      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          May 25, 2023............       390162
                            (22-05-1171P).          Mayor, City of Pickerington,     Street, Pickerington, OH         advanceSearch.
                                                    100 Lockville Road,              43147.
                                                    Pickerington, OH 43147.
    Fairfield............  Unincorporated Area of  Jeffery Fix, Fairfield County    Fairfield County Regional        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          May 25, 2023............       390158
                            Fairfield County (22-   Commissioner, 210 East Main      Planning Commission, 210 East    advanceSearch.
                            05-1171P).              Street, Room 302, Lancaster,     Main Street, Room 104,
                                                    OH 43130.                        Lancaster, OH 43130.
Washington:
    Spokane..............  Unincorporated Areas    Scott Simmons, Chief Executive   Spokane County, Public Works     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 1, 2023............       530174
                            of Spokane County (22-  Officer, Spokane County, 1116    Building, 1026 West Broadway     advanceSearch.
                            10-0742P).              West Broadway Avenue, Spokane,   Avenue, Spokane, WA 99260.
                                                    WA 99260.
    Whatcom..............  City of Lynden (22-10-  The Honorable Scott Korthuis,    City Hall, 300 4th Street,       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 29, 2023...........       530202
                            0639P).                 Mayor, City of Lynden, City      Lynden, WA 98264.                advanceSearch.
                                                    Hall, 300 4th Street, Lynden,
                                                    WA 98264.
Wisconsin:

    Outagamie............  Village of Shiocton     Terri James, President, Village  Village Hall, N5605 State Road   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          May 30, 2023............       550309
                            (22-05-2012P).          of Shiocton, Village Hall,       76, Shiocton, WI 54170.          advanceSearch.
                                                    P.O. Box 96, Shiocton, WI
                                                    54170.
    Portage..............  Unincorporated Areas    Chair Al Haga, Jr., Portage      Portage County Courthouse, 1516  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 5, 2023............       550572
                            of Portage County (23-  County, Board of Supervisors,    Church Street, Stevens Point,    advanceSearch.
                            05-0737X).              2140 Norway Pine Drive,          WI 54481.
                                                    Plover, WI 54467.
    Racine...............  City of Racine (22-05-  The Honorable Cory Mason,        City Hall, 730 Washington        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 29, 2023...........       555575
                            0143P).                 Mayor, City of Racine, City      Avenue, Racine, WI 53403.        advanceSearch.
                                                    Hall, 730 Washington Avenue,
                                                    Room 201, Racine, WI 53403.
    Racine...............  Village of Mount        The Honorable Dave Degroot,      Village Hall, 8811 Campus        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 29, 2023...........       550322
                            Pleasant (22-05-        President, Village of Mount      Drive, Mount Pleasant, WI        advanceSearch.
                            0143P).                 Pleasant, Village Hall, 8811     53406.
                                                    Campus Drive, Mount Pleasant,
                                                    WI 53406.
    Racine...............  Village of Sturtevant   The Honorable Mike Rosenbaum,    Village Hall, 2801 89th Street,  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/          Jun. 29, 2023...........       550353
                            (22-05-0143P).          President, Village of            Sturtevant, WI 53177.            advanceSearch.
                                                    Sturtevant, 2801 89th Street,
                                                    Sturtevant, WI 53177.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2023-06276 Filed 3-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 8, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79019-79020]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26909]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2020-0027; OMB No. 1660-0144]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Individual & Community Preparedness Division
(ICPD) Youth Preparedness Council (YPC) Application Form

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: 30-Day notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites
the general public to take this opportunity to comment on a
reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved information
collection for which approval has expired. FEMA will submit the
information collection abstracted below to the Office of Management and
Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The submission will describe the
nature of the information collection, the categories of respondents,
the estimated burden (i.e., the time, effort and resources used by
respondents to respond) and cost, and the actual data collection
instruments FEMA will use.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before January 7, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments at www.regulations.gov under Docket ID FEMA-
2020-0027. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. All
submissions received must include the agency name and Docket ID, and
will be posted, without change, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
http://www.regulations.gov, and will include any personal information
you provide. Therefore, submitting this information makes it public.
You may wish to read the Privacy and Security Act Notice that is
available via a link on the homepage of www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection should be made to Director,
Information Management Division<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Gretchen Wesche, Youth Preparedness Lead,
Individual and Community Preparedness Division,

Federal Emergency Management Agency,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed information collection
previously published in the Federal Register on July 10, 2020, at 85 FR
41622 with a 60 day public comment period. No comments were received.
The purpose of this notice is to notify the public that FEMA will
submit the information collection abstracted below to the Office of
Management and Budget for review and clearance.

Collection of Information

    Title: Individual & Community Preparedness Division (ICPD) Youth
Preparedness Council (YPC) Application Form.
    Type of information collection: Revision of a currently approved
information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-0144.
    Form Titles and Numbers: FEMA Form 008-0-0-24. Title: Individual &
Community Preparedness Division (ICPD) Youth Preparedness Council (YPC)
Application Form.
    Abstract: This application form is used to select interested
council members based on dedication to public service, efforts in
making a difference in their community, and potential for expanding
their impact as a national advocate for youth preparedness.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households, State, local or Tribal
government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 200.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 200.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 283.
    Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost: $2,997.
    Estimated Respondents' Operation and Maintenance Costs: $0.
    Estimated Respondents' Capital and Start-Up Costs: $72,796.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

Maile Arthur,
Acting Records Management Branch Chief, Office of the Chief
Administrative Officer, Mission Support, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2020-26909 Filed 12-7-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-27-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 167 (Wednesday, September 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49025-49027]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18835]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2017-0319; FRL-8770-01-OCSPP]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Renewal of an
Existing Collection and Request for Comment; Asbestos-Containing
Materials in Schools and Asbestos Model Accreditation Plans

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), this
document announces the availability of and solicits public comment on
an Information Collection Request (ICR) that EPA is planning to submit
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The ICR, entitled:
``Asbestos-Containing Materials in Schools and Asbestos Model
Accreditation Plans'' and identified by EPA ICR No. 1365.12 and OMB
Control No. 2070-0091, represents the renewal of an existing ICR that
is scheduled to expire on May 31, 2022. Before submitting the ICR to
OMB for review and approval under the PRA, EPA is soliciting comments
on specific aspects of the proposed information collection that is
summarized in this document. The ICR and accompanying material are
available in the docket for public review and comment.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 1, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2017-0319, through http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the
docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is
available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Putt, Existing Chemicals Risk
Management Division (7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. What information is EPA particularly interested in?

    Pursuant to PRA section 3506(c)(2)(A) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)),
EPA specifically solicits comments and information to enable it to:
    1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility.
    2. Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimates of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
    3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected.
    4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from
very small businesses (those that employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses affected by this collection.

II. What information collection activity or ICR does this action apply
to?

    Title: Asbestos-Containing Materials in Schools and Asbestos Model
Accreditation Plans.
    ICR number: EPA ICR No. 1365.12.
    OMB control number: OMB Control No. 2070-0091.
    ICR status: This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on May 31,
2022. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), after
appearing in the Federal Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR
part 9, are displayed either by publication in the Federal Register or
by other appropriate means, such as on the related collection
instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers
for certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: This Information Collection Request (ICR) addresses
reporting and recordkeeping requirements found in the Asbestos-
Containing Materials in Schools Rule (``AHERA Rule'' a.k.a. ``Schools
Rule'') and the Asbestos Model Accreditation Plan (MAP) Rule.
    Section 203 of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA,
15 U.S.C. 2641-2656), authorizes the EPA Administrator to promulgate
regulations ``for determining whether asbestos-containing material is
present in a school building under the authority of a local education
agency (LEA).'' Accordingly, the Agency developed regulations in 40 CFR
part 763, subpart E to require LEAs to conduct inspections, develop
management plans, and design or conduct response actions. Records must
be maintained by all LEAs on inspections and response action activity,
and current management plans must be provided upon request to EPA and
state reviewers for examination.
    Section 206 of AHERA, as amended, authorized the EPA Administrator,
in consultation with affected organizations, to develop a model
accreditation plan for states. The MAP provides accreditation criteria
for persons who inspect for asbestos, develop management plans, and
design or conduct response actions. States are required to adopt an
accreditation plan at least as stringent as the EPA model plan. The
accreditation requirements apply to persons who work in public and
commercial buildings as well as schools. Accreditation of laboratories
that analyze asbestos bulk samples and asbestos air samples is also
required by AHERA.
    This ICR estimates the paperwork burden for LEAs to inspect for
asbestos and update management plans to protect all school building
occupants from exposure to asbestos. This collection also estimates the
paperwork burden for the accreditation of persons who inspect for
asbestos, develop management plans, and design or conduct response
actions and the paperwork burden associated with state accreditation
programs.
    Burden statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to annual
average 19.7 hours per response for schools, 140 hours per response for
states, and 5.5 hours per response for training providers. Burden is
defined in 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    The ICR, which is available in the docket along with other related
materials, provides a detailed explanation of the collection activities
and the burden estimate that is only briefly summarized here:
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by
this ICR are elementary and secondary school districts North American
Industry Classification System ((NAICS) code 61111) and all states
(NAICS code 92311). Additionally, under the Asbestos School Hazard
Abatement Reauthorization Act (ASHARA), the Model Accreditation Plan
affects training providers (NAICS code 61143) and State Asbestos
Accreditation Programs (NAICS code 92312).
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory, as per 40 CFR 763
subpart E.
    Estimated total number of potential respondents: 138,945, which
represents 137,621 local education agencies (LEAs), 1,268 training
providers, and 56 States/Territories.
    Frequency of response: On occasion.
    Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent: 1.
    Estimated total annual burden hours: 2,600,679 hours.
    Estimated total annual costs: $106,858,522, which includes an
estimated burden cost of $106,858,522 and an estimated cost of $0 for
capital

investment or maintenance and operational costs.

III. Are there changes in the estimates from the last approval?

    There is an increase in total annual costs compared with that
identified in the ICR currently approved by OMB. This is an increase of
45,766 hours (from 2,554,913 hours to 2,600,679 hours). The increase in
the respondent burden and agency costs were caused by an increase in
the hourly wages and a change in the methodology to calculate loaded
wages (wages plus fringe benefits and overhead). This change is an
adjustment.
    In addition, OMB has requested that EPA move towards using the 18-
question format for ICR Supporting Statements used by other federal
agencies and departments and is based on the submission instructions
established by OMB in 1995, replacing the alternate format developed by
EPA and OMB prior to 1995. The Agency does not expect this change in
format to result in substantive changes to the information collection
activities or related estimated burden and costs.

IV. What is the next step in the process for this ICR?

    EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. EPA will issue another
Federal Register document pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to
announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to submit
additional comments to OMB. If you have any questions about this ICR or
the approval process, please contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

    Dated: August 26, 2021.
Michal Freedhoff,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2021-18835 Filed 8-31-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


MEMORANDUM

DATE:	May 1, 2023

FROM:	Jacob Carpenter, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IV, Atlanta, GA; Kathleen Healy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region V, Donna Lee Jones, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, and Gabrielle Raymond, RTI International

TO:		Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (40 CFR part 63, subpart CCCCC) Docket

SUBJECT:	Preliminary Analysis and Recommendations for Potential Coke Oven Combustion Stack 1-hr Additional Standard Under Technology Review for NESHAP for Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (40 CFR part 63, subpart CCCCC) __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0	INTRODUCTION

This memorandum discusses the basis for considering an additional, less than 24-hour opacity standard for battery stacks for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (40 CFR part 63, subpart CCCCC), referred hereafter as the Coke PQBS NESHAP. In the 2002 Coke PQBS NESHAP, the EPA established battery stack daily (24-hr) average emissions limits of 15% and 20% for by-product batteries on a normal coking cycle and an extended coking cycle, respectively. Each battery stack is required to be monitored for opacity at all times using a continuous opacity monitoring system (COMs). An additional battery stack opacity standard could be added to the Coke PQBS NESHAP as part of the technology review required in CAA section 112(d)(6).

2.0	BACKGROUND

Battery stack opacity is perhaps the best single indicator of the maintenance status of coke ovens and could be considered as an indicator of fugitive and excess HAP emissions from coke oven batteries. In the preamble to the final 2002 rule for the Coke PQBS NESHAP, the EPA described the linkages between oven wall condition, operating and maintenance (O&M) practices, battery stack opacity, and HAP emissions (see 68 FR 18019-18020). The EPA stated in the 2002 final rule preamble (68 FR 18019) that that the primary factor affecting battery stack opacity is the condition of oven walls, which deteriorate over time and cause leaks and increased emissions of coke oven emissions (COE). Well-maintained ovens will minimize the leakage of raw COE from within the ovens into the flues and to the combustion stack. A well-maintained oven also will decrease the likelihood of uneven and incomplete coking, which results in more particulate and HAP emissions and higher opacity during pushing (known as green pushes). Well-maintained ovens also result in fewer door leaks and minimize other oven sources of fugitive and excess COE emissions (§63.7296).

3.0	TECHNOLOGY REVIEW OF COKE PQBS NESHAP BATTERY STACK OPACITY

Based on a preliminary analysis of data acquired in the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 114 request for the Coke PQBS NESHAP in 2022 (hereafter referred to as the 2022 Coke Ovens CAA section 114 request), there are significant differences between the submitted battery stack COMs data among the six operating byproduct facilities in the coke industry. The battery stack COMS data show that some sources maintain battery stack opacities far below the 24-hr limits in Coke PQBS NESHAP (which are considered to be the well-controlled sources), while others operate consistently just under the limit and significantly higher than these well-controlled sources. The EPA anticipates that these well-controlled sources have utilized the analysis of short-term combustion stack opacity readings to direct the implementation of their O&M practices. That these sources consistently achieve low short-term and 24-hr opacity levels over many years provides evidence that their O&M practices are cost-effective. Therefore, it is possible that additional shorter-term battery stack standards, such as a 1-hr standard, could lower the opacity of facilities that are only achieving opacity slightly  less than the existing 24-hr limit in the Coke PQBS NESHAP, and reduce COE and other coke oven HAP emissions from coke batteries at these facilities.

3.1	Approaches For Additional Shorter-term Battery Stack Standards

There are a number of approaches possible to lower the 24-hr battery stack opacity standards: (1) reduce the 24-hr battery stack opacity limit in terms of percent opacity; (2) add a shorter-term battery stack opacity requirement, such as 1-hr, with or without change to the opacity limit; or (3) replace the current 24-hr standard with a shorter-term battery stack opacity requirement, with or without change to the opacity limit. We have asked for comment on the use of a shorter-term limit in the current Coke PQBS NESHAP proposal (2023).         Three facilities responding to the 2022 Coke Ovens section 114 request noted short-term opacity limits required by their state or local rules, that include:

 U.S. Steel Clairton (PA): no more than 3 minutes above 20% in any 60-minute period.  Cleveland Cliffs (CC) Burns Harbor (IN): 6-minute rolling average 40% limit and a 2-hr rolling 20% limit.  DTE/EES River Rouge (MI): 6- minute rolling average 20% limit with a single 6-minute average per hour up to 27%.

Table 1 documents the above state or local rule limits reported in the 2022 Coke Ovens CAA section 114 request along with the Coke PQBS NESHAP limits. Table 2 lists the federal (Coke PQBS NESHAP), state, local coke battery stack COMs requirements, ranked by decreasing averaging time periods.

3.2	COMS Data From 2022 Coke CAA Section 114 Request

The 1-hr battery stack COMS data obtained from the six byproduct coke facilities reporting in the 2022 Coke CAA section 114 request are shown in Appendix A. There is a wide variation between some of the COMs data from these facilities. Appendix B shows 1-minute battery stack COMs data from these same facilities, with similar wide variation.

4.0	WORK PRACTICES, EQUIPMENT, AND OTHER MEASURE USED TO MINIMIZE LEAKS FOR OVENS

As part of the 2022 Coke CAA section 114 request, the EPA received descriptions of work practices being performed by coke facilities to ensure the integrity of their ovens. The descriptions of work practices are shown in Appendix C. The health of the ovens can directly impact battery opacity, with higher battery stack opacity associated with oven cracks and degradation. An analysis of specific work practices at the better-controlled facilities is needed so that recommendations or requirements to control battery stack opacity at all times could be made.

          Table 1. Summary of Less than 24-hr Battery Stack Opacity Limits at Currently Operating Coke Byproduct Facilities                                    Facility                       Shorter-term Opacity Permit Limits                             Shorter Term Reference                  Coke PQBS NESHAP Battery Stack Opacity Limit                                     (24-Hr)                                                                     3 Minutes in any 1 Hour                                     Rolling                                    6 Minutes                                  One 6-Minute                                 Average per Hr                                     Rolling                                      2 Hr                                 Never to Exceed                                   Hard Limit                                                                                ABC Coke-AL

                                20% (extended) CC Burns Harbor-IN                                                                               40%                                                                               20%                                         326 IAC 2                                  15% (normal) CC Monessen-PA                                       20%                                                                                60% 25 PA Code 123.41                                  15% (normal) CC Warren-OH

                                 15% (normal) DTE/EES-MI                                                                               20%                                       27%                                                                                Michigan Admin. Code R. 336.1301                                  15% (normal) USS Clairton-PA                                       20%                                                                                60% Allegheny County Code §2105.21.f                                     15%/20%

     Table 2. Federal, State, Local Coke Battery Stack COMs Requirements                       Coke Battery Stack COMs Requirements                                      Opacity                                      Rule Coke PQBS NESHAP 24-hr-normal operation 15% EPA 2002 Coke PQBS NESHAP 24-hr-extended coking operation 20% EPA 2002  3 minutes in any 1 hour 20% PA 6 minutes in any 1 hour 27% MI Rolling 6 minutes 20%, 40% MI, IN Rolling 2 hour 20% IN Never to exceed 60% PA                                         APPENDICES

APPENDIX A                                         1-HOUR CONTINUOUS OPACITY MONITOR (COMs) BATTERY STACK DATA  FROM 2022 CAA SECTION 114 REQUEST

ABC Coke-AL 1-hour COMs Data -

ABC Coke is currently subject only to the Coke PQBS NESHAP's 24-hr opacity limit of 15% for normal operation and 20% opacity for extended coking.

   USS Clairton-PA COMs 1-hour Data

USS Clairton has a local county limit of no more than 3 minutes above 20% in any 60 minute period.

	   CC-Burn Harbor-IN 1-hour COMs Data

CC-Burn Harbor has state limits of 6-minutes at 40% opacity and 2-hr average of 20% opacity.

CC Monessen 1-hour COMs Data

CC-Monessen has state limits of 20% limit for 3 minutes in any 1 hour and a 60% never-to-exceed opacity limit.

CC Warren 1-hour COMs Data

CC-Warren currently is subject only to the 24-hr opacity limit in the Coke PQBS NESHAP.

DTE/EES 1-hour COMS Data

DTE is subject to state limits of 20% for a rolling 6-minute average opacity and 27% for any one 6-minute average opacity per hour.

                                        APPENDIX B 1-MINUTE COMS BATTERY STACK DATA  FROM 2022 COKE CAA SECTION 114 REQUESTS                                         ABC Coke-AL 1-minute COMS Data from 2021

ABC is subject only to the 24-hour opacity limit in the Coke PQBS NESHAP.

USS Clairton-PA 1-Minute COMS Data from 2021

USS Clairton has a limit of no more than 3 minutes above 20% in any 60 minute period.

CC-Burns Harbor-IN 1-minute COMS Data from 2022

CC Burns Harbor is subject to a 6- minute 40% limit and a 2-hr 20% limit.

NOTE: regular artifacts around 40% opacity in data that should be ignored. This is likely associated with some COMs calibration.

CC-Monessen-PA 1-minute COMs Data from 2021

CC-Warren-OH 1-minute COMs Data from 2019

DTE/EES-MI 1-minute COMs Data from 2021

APPENDIX C                                         WORK PRACTICES TO REDUCE OVEN LEAKING INTO BATTERY STACKS EXHAUST

                                                                                Appendix Table C-1: List of Unique Oven Leak Work Practices and Costs Reported in 2022 CAA Section 114 Responses              Work Practice / Equipment / Other Measure Description    Work Practice Required or Beyond Minimum Requirements in 40 CFR part 63,                                     Subpart L                         No. Facilities Currently Using                           Capital Purchases and Year                        Annual O&M Expenses and Year$                                 Labor (hrs/day)                                Labor (hrs/week)                                      Labor                                    (hrs/yr)                                 Type of Labor                         Estimated Control Efficiency (%) Periodic complete oven overhaul: Inspection of the oven                                    Required                                         6                                   $100K-$250K                                   $100K-$250K                                        8                                       40                                      2,080                           operators / subcontractors                                     >50% Periodic complete oven overhaul: Degraphitizing of all deposits within the chamber (walls, ceiling, ascension pipes)                                    Required                                        6                                    <$100K                                    <$100K                                      <8                                     <40                                    <2,080                                    operators                                     >50% Periodic complete oven overhaul: Oxy-thermic welding of cracks, holes and surface damage of the refractory brickwork                                    Required                                        6                                   $100K-$250K                                   $100K-$250K                                        8                                       40                                      2,080                           operators / subcontractors                                     >50% Periodic complete oven overhaul: Repair of the oven chamber floor by flooding with cement                                    Required                                         3                                   $100K-$250K                                   $100K-$250K                                        8                                       40                                      2,080                           operators / subcontractors                                     >50% Periodic complete oven overhaul to include injection of dust into fine cracks                                    Required                                         5                                       CBI                                       CBI                                       CBI                                       CBI                                       CBI                                       CBI                                       CBI Periodic complete oven overhaul: Use of coke oven chamber wall diagnosing-repairing apparatus                                    Required                                         1                                       CBI                                       CBI                                       CBI                                       CBI                                       CBI                                       CBI                                       CBI

Appendix Table C-2: Specific Oven Leak Work Practices, by Facility, Reported in 2022 CAA Section 114 Responses Facility ID (2022 section 114 ICR) Indicate if currently using, tried in past, or considered in past Describe how well it works/ worked Describe why not using anymore Emission Source (specify) Describe Measure (Work Practice/ Equipment /Other) Capital Purchases and Year$ Annual O&M Expenses and Year$ Labor (hrs/day) Labor (hrs/week) Labor (hrs/yr) Type of Labor (e.g., (technician, skilled worker, manager, etc.) Estimated Control Efficiency (%) of Work Practice or Equipment                         Periodic Complete Oven Overhaul                             Inspection Of The Oven CC-BurnsHarbor-IN Currently using Works well based on the results of the COMS data. N/A

CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CC-Monessen-PA Currently using Works well based on the results of the COMS data. N/A

CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CC-Warren-OH Currently using Works well based on the results of the COMS data. N/A

CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI USS-Clairton-PA Currently performing works well N/A CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI ABC-Tarrant-AL Currently performing	 works well   002, 003, 004 Operators looks at each oven after a push, if problem is suspected. Operator informs shift foreman, who then notifies ovens foreman for decision on how to repair possible problem.               EES-River Rouge-MI Currently Using Operators inspect ovens on a planned schedule and/or if there is an identified issue NA Doors SOPs are created and trained, inspection and repair triggered by levels of emissions, documentation is submitted to Management  $100K-$250K $100K-$250K 8 40 2080 operators / subcontractors >50% Degraphitizing Of All Deposits Within The Chamber (Walls, Ceiling, Ascension Pipes)  CC-BurnsHarbor-IN Currently using Assume degraphitize means decarbonize.  Works well. Completed for normal operation of oven for production purposes and proper heating.  N/A

CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CC-Monessen-PA Currently using Assume degraphitize means decarbonize.  Works well. Completed for normal operation of oven for production purposes and proper heating.  N/A N/A                 CC-Warren-OH Currently using Assume degraphitize means decarbonize.  Works well. Completed for normal operation of oven for production purposes and proper heating.  N/A N/A                 USS-Clairton-PA Currently performing works well N/A CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI ABC-Tarrant-AL Currently performing works well   002, 003, 004 De-Carbonization can occur in several ways. Ceiling is decarbonized in two ways. 1. Air injected into the oven as it is being pushed.  2. Carbon cutters are mounted on tip of Pusher Ram to cut carbon as it passes through the oven while pushing. This is done on each oven pushed. The stand pipes are cleaned by high pressure water hose mounted on the Larry Car. The operator cuts the carbon out of the Stand Pipe before each charge. Walls are cleaned by the pushing process.               EES-River Rouge-MI Currently Using Operators inspect ovens on a planned schedule and/or if there is an identified issue NA Doors SOPs are created and trained, inspection and repair triggered by levels of emissions, documentation is submitted to Management  <$100K <$100K <8 <40 <2080 operators >50% Oxy-Thermic Welding Of Cracks, Holes And Surface Damage Of The Refractory Brickwork CC-BurnsHarbor-IN Currently using Works well based on the results of the COMS data. N/A

CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CC-Monessen-PA Currently using Works well based on the results of the COMS data. N/A Doors Oxy-thermic welding of cracks, holes and surface damage of the refractory brickwork CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI Unknown CC-Warren-OH Currently using Works well based on the results of the COMS data. N/A Doors Oxy-thermic welding of cracks, holes and surface damage of the refractory brickwork CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI Unknown USS-Clairton-PA Currently performing works well N/A CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI ABC-Tarrant-AL currently using Does the job.    002, 003, 004 Oven Repair has the door removed. Places fiber wool in the oven for a heat shield. Uses welder to "weld" up small holes and cracks. Also welds up brickwork around the door frames.               EES-River Rouge-MI Currently Using Operators inspect ovens on a planned schedule and/or if there is an identified issue NA Doors Work is subcontracted upon identification of repairs needed during inspection $100K-$250K $100K-$250K 8 40 2080 operators / subcontractors >50%            Repair Of The Oven Chamber Floor By Flooding With Cement CC-BurnsHarbor-IN Currently using, as needed Works well based on the results of the COMS data. N/A

CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CC-Monessen-PA Not using N/A N/A N/A                 CC-Warren-OH Not using N/A N/A N/A                 USS-Clairton-PA Not currently performing works well when used Currently ceramic welding is used for damage greater than 1" in depth and then use a plastic ram that melts and fills in floor deterioration. This is performed as needed. Floors are inspected on every oven that is out of service. CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI ABC-Tarrant-AL ABC uses a product named Super 3000 made by Reno Refractories.  According to Oven repair Dept. Works better than any used prior.   002, 003, 004 flood floor with super 3000               EES-River Rouge-MI Currently Using Operators inspect ovens on a planned schedule and/or if there is an identified issue NA Doors Work is subcontracted upon identification of repairs needed during inspection $100K-$250K $100K-$250K 8 40 2080 operators / subcontractors >50%                       Injection Of Dust Into Fine Cracks CC-BurnsHarbor-IN Currently using Works well based on the results of the COMS data. N/A

CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CC-Monessen-PA Currently using Works well based on the results of the COMS data. N/A Doors Injection of dust into fine cracks CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI Unknown CC-Warren-OH Currently using Works well based on the results of the COMS data. N/A Doors Injection of powdered dust into fine cracks CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI Unknown USS-Clairton-PA Currently performing works well N/A CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI ABC-Tarrant-AL ABC uses this procedure. Oven repair dept. utilizes this practice on all three shifts. We normally do 8 - 10 ovens per shift. helps in prevention of oven wall leakage.   002, 003, 004 Injector is placed over charging hole and dust is injected into the oven chamber.               EES-River Rouge-MI Never Considered NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA          Use Of Coke Oven Chamber Wall Diagnosing-Repairing Apparatus CC-BurnsHarbor-IN Not using N/A N/A N/A                 CC-Monessen-PA Not using N/A N/A N/A                 CC-Warren-OH Tried in past Works well Used periodically for inspections Coke Battery Stack Water cooled camera CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI Unknown USS-Clairton-PA currently using works well N/A CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI ABC-Tarrant-AL visual     002, 003, 004                 EES-River Rouge-MI Not in Use NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA