[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40670-40672]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17536]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-7264; Product Identifier 2015-NM-185-AD; Amendment
39-18998; AD 2017-17-08]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A330-200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series airplanes; and
Model A340-500 and -600 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a
quality control review on the final assembly line, which determined
that the wrong aluminum alloy was used to manufacture several
structural parts. This AD requires a one-time eddy current conductivity
measurement of certain cabin and cargo compartment structural parts to
determine if an incorrect aluminum alloy was used, and replacement of
any affected part with a serviceable part. We are issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective October 2, 2017.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of October 2,
2017.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax
+33 5 61 93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet
http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
7264.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
7264; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone
800-647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 425-227-
1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to
amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Airbus
Model A330-200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series airplanes; and Model
A340-500 and -600 series airplanes. The SNPRM published in the Federal
Register on May 19, 2017 (82 FR 22907) (``the SNPRM''). We preceded the
SNPRM with a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that published in the
Federal Register on June 21, 2016 (81 FR 40201) (``the NPRM''). The
NPRM proposed to require a one-time eddy current conductivity
measurement of certain cabin and cargo compartment structural parts to
determine if an incorrect aluminum alloy was used, and replacement of
any affected part with a serviceable part. The NPRM was prompted by a
quality control review on the final assembly line, which determined
that the wrong aluminum alloy was used to manufacture several
structural parts. The SNPRM proposed to require new inspection
locations for certain airplanes, and removing incorrect part numbers.
We are issuing this AD to detect and replace structural parts made of
an incorrect aluminum alloy. This condition could result in reduced
structural integrity of the airplane.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2017-0021, dated February 8, 2017 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Airbus Model
A330-200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series airplanes; and Model A340-500
and -600 series airplanes. The MCAI states:

    Following an Airbus quality control review on the final assembly
line, it was discovered that wrong aluminum alloy was used to
manufacture several structural parts.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could reduce the
structural integrity of the aeroplane.
    To address this potential unsafe condition, Airbus published
[Service Bulletin] (SB) A330-53-3261, SB A330-53-3262, and SB A340-
53-5072, as applicable to aeroplane type/model, to provide
instructions to identify the affected parts. Consequently, EASA
issued AD 2015-0206 to require a one-time special detailed
inspection (SDI) [eddy current conductivity measurements] of certain
cabin and/or cargo compartment parts for material identification
and, depending on findings, replacement with serviceable parts.
    Since that [EASA] AD was issued, Airbus identified that the list
of affected structural parts in SB A330-53-3261 was incorrect.
Prompted by these findings, Airbus issued SB A330-53-3261 Revision
01 to introduce the new locations to be inspected and remove other
parts not affected.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2015-0206, which is superseded, and expands
the locations to be inspected.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
7264.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the SNPRM or on the determination
of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed, except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
SNPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the SNPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus has issued the following service information:
     Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3261, Revision 01,
including Appendixes 01, 02, and 03, dated November 10, 2016.
     Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3262, including Appendixes
01 and 02, dated June 23, 2015.

     Airbus Service Bulletin A340-53-5072, including Appendixes
01 and 02, dated June 23, 2015.
    This service information describes procedures for a one-time eddy
current conductivity measurement of certain cabin and cargo compartment
structural parts to determine if an incorrect aluminum alloy was used,
and replacement of any affected part with a serviceable part. These
documents are distinct because they apply to different parts on
different airplanes. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 37 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We also estimate that it takes about 17 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD on U.S. operators to be $53,465, or $1,445 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any on-condition repairs take about
45 work-hours and will require parts costing $0, for a cost of $3,825
per product. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that
might need these repairs.
    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all available costs in our
cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to
the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2017-17-08 Airbus: Amendment 39-18998; Docket No. FAA-2016-7264;
Product Identifier 2015-NM-185-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective October 2, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category.
    (1) Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -223F, -243, -243F,
-301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes,
manufacturer serial numbers identified in Airbus Service Bulletin
A330-53-3261, Revision 01, including Appendixes 01, 02, and 03,
dated November 10, 2016; and/or Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-
3262, including Appendixes 01 and 02, dated June 23, 2015.
    (2) Airbus Model A340-541 and -642 airplanes, manufacturer
serial numbers 1030, 1040, 1079, 1091, 1102, and 1122.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a quality control review on the final
assembly line, which determined that the wrong aluminum alloy was
used to manufacture several structural parts. We are issuing this AD
to detect and replace structural parts made of an incorrect aluminum
alloy. This condition could result in reduced structural integrity
of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) One-Time Measurement

    Except as provided by paragraph (i) of this AD: Within 6 years
after the effective date of this AD, but not exceeding 12 years
since the date of issuance of the original certificate of
airworthiness or the date of issuance of the original export
certificate of airworthiness; do a one-time eddy current
conductivity measurement of the cabin and cargo compartment
structural parts identified in the ``Affected Part Number'' column
of table 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD to determine if an
incorrect aluminum alloy was used, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information
identified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD.
    (1) For cargo compartment structural parts for Model A330
airplanes: Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3261, Revision 01,
including Appendixes 01, 02, and 03, dated November 10, 2016.
    (2) For cabin structural parts for Model A330 airplanes: Airbus
Service Bulletin
    A330-53-3262, including Appendixes 01 and 02, dated June 23,
2015; except part number F5377004320300, which is located in the
``cabin'' area, but must be inspected in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A330-53-3261, Revision 01, including Appendixes 01,
02, and 03, dated November 10, 2016.
    (3) For cargo compartment structural parts for Model A340
airplanes: Airbus Service Bulletin A340-53-5072, including
Appendixes 01 and 02, dated June 23, 2015.

  Table 1 to Paragraphs (g) and (h) of This AD--Parts To Be Inspected/
                                Installed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Acceptable
         Affected part No.           replacement part No.       Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
F5347126620600....................  F5347126620000.......  Cabin.
F5347126621000....................  F5347126620400.......  Cabin.
F5377004320300....................  F5377004320351.......  Cabin.
F5347170420400....................  F5347170420400.......  Cargo.
F5347170420600....................  F5347170420600.......  Cargo.
G5367131300000....................  G5367131300000.......  Cargo.
G5367173700000....................  G5367173700000.......  Cargo.
G5367173800000....................  G5367173800000.......  Cargo.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(h) Replacement

    If during the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD,
any affected part having a part number specified in table 1 to
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD is found to have a measured value
greater than that specified in Figure A-GFAAA, Sheet 02,
``Inspection Flowchart,'' of the applicable service information
identified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD,
except as provided by paragraph (i) of this AD: Within 6 years after
the effective date of this AD, but not exceeding 12 years since the
date of issuance of the original certificate of airworthiness or the
date of issuance of the original export certificate of
airworthiness, replace the affected part with an acceptable
replacement part having a part number specified in table 1 to
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information
identified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD.

(i) Exception to Certain Service Information

    Where Figure A-GFAAA, Sheet 02, ``Inspection Flowchart,'' of the
service information identified in paragraphs (g)(2) and (g)(3) of
this AD specifies to ``do the conductivity ([sigma]) measurement
with 60kHz (refer to Appendix 01) [sigma]480 = ___MS/m,'' the
correct conductivity measurement is ``[sigma]60 = ___MS/m.''

(j) Additional Inspection for Certain Airplanes

    For Model A330 airplanes on which the inspection and
replacement, as applicable, specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of
this AD were done before the effective date of this AD, in
accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3261, dated June 23,
2015: Within 6 years after the effective date of this AD, but not
exceeding 12 years since the date of issuance of the original
certificate of airworthiness or the date of issuance of the original
export certificate of airworthiness, do a one-time eddy current
conductivity measurement of structural parts having part number (P/
N) G5367131300000, P/N G5367173700000, and P/N G5367173800000,
located in fuselage section 15, in accordance with the ``Additional
Work'' section of the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A330-53-3261, Revision 01, including Appendixes 01, 02, and
03, dated November 10, 2016.

(k) Replacement

    If during the inspection required by paragraph (j) of this AD,
any affected part having a part number specified in paragraph (j) of
this AD is found to have a measured value greater than that
specified in Figure A-GFAAA, Sheet 02, ``Inspection Flowchart,'' of
Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3261, Revision 01, including
Appendixes 01, 02, and 03, dated November 10, 2016: Within 6 years
after the effective date of this AD, but not exceeding 12 years
since the date of issuance of the original certificate of
airworthiness or the date of issuance of the original export
certificate of airworthiness, replace the affected part with an
acceptable replacement part having a part number specified in table
1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3261,
Revision 01, including Appendixes 01, 02, and 03, dated November 10,
2016.

(l) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the International Section, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (m)(2) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval
(DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-
authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any service information
contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.

(m) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2017-0021, dated February 8,
2017, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-7264.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3261, Revision 01, including
Appendixes 01, 02, and 03, dated November 10, 2016.
    (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3262, including Appendixes
01 and 02, dated June 23, 2015.
    (iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-53-5072, including Appendixes
01 and 02, dated June 23, 2015.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.airbus.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 9, 2017.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-17536 Filed 8-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 190 (Wednesday, September 30, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61610-61614]
[FR Doc No: 2020-20402]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1989-0011; EPA-HQ-SFUND-2004-0004; EPA-HQ-SFUND-1999-
0013; EPA-HQ-SFUND-1986-0005; EPA-HQ-SFUND-2011-0066; EPA-HQ-SFUND-
1999-0013; EPA-HQ-SFUND-1989-008; EPA-HQ-SFUND-1983-0002; EPA-HQ-SFUND-
2000-0006; EPA-HQ-SFUND-2005-0011; EPA-HQ-SFUND-1994-0009; EPA-HQ-
SFUND-1992-0014; FRL-10014-15-OLEM]

Deletions From the National Priorities List

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announces the
deletion of eight sites and the partial deletion of nine sites from the
Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL, created under
section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an appendix of the
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP).
The EPA and the states, through their designated state agencies, have
determined that all appropriate response actions under CERCLA, other
than operation and maintenance, monitoring, and five-year reviews,
where applicable, have been completed. However, this deletion does not
preclude future actions under Superfund.

DATES: The document is effective on September 30, 2020.

ADDRESSES:
    Docket: EPA has established a docket for this action under the
Docket Identification included in Table 1 in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the corresponding Regional Records Centers. Locations,
addresses, and phone numbers-of the Regional Records Centers follow.
    Regional Records Centers:
     Region 1 (CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT), U.S. EPA, Superfund
Records and Information Center, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100,
Boston, MA 02109-3912; 617/918-1413.
     Region 2 (NJ, NY, PR, VI), U.S. EPA, 290 Broadway, New
York, NY 10007-1866; 212/637-4342.
     Region 3 (DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV), U.S. EPA, Library, 1650
Arch Street Mail code 3HS12, Philadelphia, PA 19103; 215/814-3355.
     Region 4 (AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN), U.S. EPA, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Mail code 9T25, Atlanta, GA 30303; 404/562-8637.
     Region 5 (IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI), U.S. EPA Superfund
Division Librarian/SFD Records Manager SRC-7J, Metcalfe Federal
Building, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604; 312/886-4465.
     Region 6 (AR, LA, NM, OK, TX), U.S. EPA, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200, Mail code 6SFTS, Dallas, TX 75202-2733; 214/665-7436.
     Region 7 (IA, KS, MO, NE), U.S. EPA, 11201 Renner Blvd.,
Mail code SUPRSTAR, Lenexa, KS 66219; 913/551-7956.
     Region 8 (CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY), U.S. EPA, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Mail code Records Center, Denver, CO 80202-1129; 303/312-7273.
     Region 9 (AZ, CA, HI, NV, AS, GU, MP), U.S. EPA, 75
Hawthorne Street, Mail code SFD 6-1, San Francisco, CA 94105; 415/972-
3160.
     Region 10 (AK, ID, OR, WA), U.S. EPA, 1200 6th Avenue,
Suite 155, Mail stop OMP-161, Seattle, WA 98101; 206/553-4494.
    The EPA is temporarily suspending Regional Records Centers for
public visitors to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID-19.
Information in these repositories, including the deletion docket, has
not been updated with hardcopy or electronic media. For further
information and updates on EPA Docket Center services, please visit us
online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    The EPA continues to carefully and continuously monitor information
from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), local area
health departments, and our Federal partners so that we can respond
rapidly as conditions change regarding COVID.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
 Robert Lim, U.S. EPA Region 1 (CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT),
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>617/918-1392
 Mabel Garcia, U.S. EPA Region 2 (NJ, NY, PR, VI),
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>212/637-4356
 Andrew Hass, U.S. EPA Region 3 (DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV),
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>215/814-2049
 Deborah Cox or Brian Farrier, U.S. EPA Region 4 (AL, FL, GA,
KY, MS, NC, SC, TN<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or 8bedeaf9f9e2eef9a5e9f9e2eae5cbeefbeaa5ece4fd, 404/
562-8317 or 404/562-8952.
 Karen Cibulskis, U.S. EPA Region 5 (IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI),
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>312/886-1843
 Brian Mueller, U.S. EPA Region 6 (AR, LA, NM, OK, TX),
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>214/665-7167
 David Wennerstrom, U.S. EPA Region 7 (IA, KS, MO, NE),
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>913/551-7996
 Linda Kiefer, U.S. EPA Region 8 (CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY),
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>303/312-6689
 Eric Canteenwala, U.S. EPA Region 9 (AZ, CA, HI, NV, AS, GU,
MP<EMAIL_ADDRESS>415/972-3932
 Jeremy Jennings, U.S. EPA Region 10 (AK, ID, OR, WA),
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>206/553-2724
 Chuck Sands, U.S. EPA Headquarters<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
703/603-8857

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table 1- the sites to be deleted and
partially deleted from the NPL are:

                                                     Table 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    City/county,
           Site name                   state                Type                        Docket No.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
American Crossarm & Conduit Co.  Chehalis, WA.....  Full................  EPA-HQ-SFUND-1989-0011
Annapolis Lead Mine............  Annapolis, MO....  Full................  EPA-HQ-SFUND-2004-0004
Cimarron Mining Corp...........  Carrizozo, NM....  Full................  EPA-HQ-SFUND-1989-0011
Fridley Commons Park Well Field  Fridley, MN......  Full................  EPA-HQ-SFUND-1999-0013
Jasco Chemical Corp............  Mountain View, CA  Full................  EPA-HQ-SFUND-1989-0011
Northside Landfill.............  Spokane, WA......  Full................  EPA-HQ-SFUND-1986-0005
Red Panther Chemical Company...  Clarksdale, MS...  Full................  EPA-HQ-SFUND- 2011-0066
Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing...  Collinsville, OK.  Full................  EPA-HQ-SFUND-1999-0013
Anaconda Co. Smelter...........  Anaconda, MT.....  Partial.............  EPA-HQ-SFUND-1983-0002
Douglass Road/Uniroyal, Inc.,    Mishawaka, IN....  Partial.............  EPA-HQ-SFUND-1989-0008
 Landfill.
Fort Wayne Reduction Dump......  Fort Wayne, IN...  Partial.............  EPA-HQ-SFUND-1986-0005
Industri-Plex..................  Woburn, MA.......  Partial.............  EPA-HQ-SFUND-1983-0002
Macalloy Corporation...........  North Charleston,  Partial.............  EPA-HQ-SFUND-2000-0006
                                  SC.
Queen City Farms...............  Maple Valley, WA.  Partial.............  EPA-HQ-SFUND-2005-0011
Redstone Arsenal (USARMY/NASA).  Huntsville, AL...  Partial.............  EPA-HQ-SFUND-1994-0009
Southeast Rockford Gd Wtr        Rockford, IL.....  Partial.............  EPA-HQ-SFUND-1989-0008
 Contamination.
U.S. Smelter & Lead Refining     East Chicago, IN.  Partial.............  EPA-HQ-SFUND-1992-0014
 Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The sites to be deleted from the NPL, information concerning the
proposed rule for the deletion including reference documents with the
rationale and data principally relied upon by the EPA to determine that
the Superfund response is complete, public comment and Responsiveness
Summary (RS) (if applicable) are included in Table 2 as follows:

                                                                         Table 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Date,
              Site name                 proposed rule            FR citation                  Public  comment                RS              Footnote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
American Crossarm & Conduit Co.......       7/10/2020  85 FR 41486....................  No........................  No..................            1, 3
Annapolis Lead Mine..................       7/10/2020  85 FR 41487....................  No........................  No..................         1, 2, 3
Cimarron Mining Corp.................        8/5/2020  85 FR 47331....................  No........................  No..................         1, 2, 3
Fridley Commons Park Well Field......       6/23/2020  85 FR 37619....................  Yes.......................  No..................  ..............
Jasco Chemical Corp..................       5/26/2020  85 FR 31427....................  Yes.......................  Yes.................  ..............
Northside Landfill...................       7/14/2020  85 FR 42431....................  Yes.......................  Yes.................            1, 3
Red Panther Chemical Company.........       7/15/2020  85 FR 42813....................  No........................  No..................  ..............
Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing.........       7/16/2020  85 FR 43193....................  No........................  No..................         1, 2, 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The NCP permits activities to occur at a deleted site or that media
or parcel of a partially deleted site, including operation and
maintenance of the remedy, monitoring, and five-year reviews These
activities for the site are entered in Table 2 and 3 in this
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section, if applicable, under Footnote such
that; 1= site has continued operation and maintenance of the remedy, 2=
site receives continued monitoring, and 3= site five-year reviews are
conducted.
    The EPA received comments on three of the sites included for
deletion in this final rule. For the Fridley Commons Park Well Field
site, the closing date for comments on the Notice of Intent to Delete
was July 23, 2020. One public comment was received which was not
related to the deletion of the site from the NPL and EPA still believes
the deletion action is appropriate. The comment and a memorandum
documenting receipt of the comment were prepared and placed in the
docket, EPA-HQ-SFUND-1999-0013, on https://www.regulations.gov, and in
the Regional repository listed in the ADDRESSES section.
    For the Jasco Chemical Corp. site, the closing date for comments on
the Notice of Intent to Delete was June 25, 2020. Eight public comments
were received. Commenters were concerned with a nearby unrelated
chemical plume and exposure to construction workers and future
residents of an apartment complex under construction at the site.
Potential risks to workers and future residents at the Jasco site are
being managed independently of the CERCLA cleanup process. There is a
Covenant and Environmental Restriction on Property, or deed
restriction, on the Jasco property which requires the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board and EPA to oversee future use of
the site, and to ensure soil and groundwater is managed according to a
soil management plan that prevents any human exposure. The plan ensures
continued sampling of site soil and groundwater, as it is transported
offsite, to assure protection of human health and environment. A vapor
mitigation system will be installed under the building and confirmatory
pre-occupancy indoor air sampling to verify the efficacy of the system.
EPA has determined that it is appropriate to proceed with the deletion
because all response actions at the Jasco site are complete and the
criteria for deletion have been met. A responsiveness summary was
prepared and placed in the docket, EPA-HQ-SFUND-1989-0011, on https://www.regulations.gov, and in the Regional repository listed in the
ADDRESSES section.
    For the Northside Landfill site, the closing date for comments on
the Notice

of Intent to Delete was August 13, 2020. Two public comments were
received. One commenter was concerned that EPA make decisions using
good science and hard data. Such decision-making is documented in
reports included in the deletion docket. The other commenter was
concerned about the future use of the landfill property, particularly
residential or commercial redevelopment. The site has an Environmental
Covenant which restricts future uses of the site. The limitations
prohibit any activity that would damage or disturb the integrity of the
landfill cap which include any drilling, digging, excavation or
placement of objects or equipment which would stress or deform the
surface. Any future land use would need to be consistent with the
Environmental Covenant. EPA still believes the deletion action is
appropriate. A responsiveness summary was prepared and placed in the
docket, EPA-HQ-SFUND-1986-0005, on https://www.regulations.gov, and in
the Regional repository listed in the Addresses section. For all other
sites not specified above, no adverse comments were received.
    The sites to be partially deleted from the NPL are included in
Table 3 as follows:

                                                                         Table 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Date, proposed
              Site name                     rule                 FR citation                  Public comment                 RS              Footnote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anaconda Co. Smelter.................       8/10/2020  85 FR 48132....................  No........................  No..................         1, 2, 3
Douglass Road/Uniroyal, Inc.,               6/23/2020  85 FR 37617....................  Yes.......................  Yes.................         1, 2, 3
 Landfill.
Fort Wayne Reduction Dump............       7/16/2020  85 FR 43191....................  Yes.......................  Yes.................         1, 2, 3
Industri-Plex........................       7/15/2020  85 FR 42809....................  No........................  No..................  ..............
Macalloy Corporation.................       7/27/2020  85 FR 45155....................  Yes.......................  Yes.................            2, 3
Queen City Farms.....................       7/14/2020  85 FR 42343....................  Yes.......................  Yes.................         1, 2, 3
Redstone Arsenal (USARMY/NASA).......       7/22/2020  85 FR 44259....................  No........................  No..................  ..............
Southeast Rockford Gd Wtr                   6/23/2020  85 FR 37615....................  Yes.......................  No..................  ..............
 Contamination.
U.S. Smelter & Lead Refining Inc.....        7/8/2020  85 FR 40959....................  Yes.......................  Yes.................  ..............
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The area and media of each Superfund site partial deletion is
specified in the applicable proposed rule cited in Table 3 in this
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. All other Superfund site areas and
media will remain on the NPL and are not being considered for deletion
as part of this action.
    The EPA received comments on six of the sites included for partial
deletion in this rule. For the Douglass Road/Uniroyal, Inc., Landfill
site, the closing date for comments on the Notice of Intent to
Partially Delete was July 23, 2020. Three public comments were
received. One comment from a resident in a nearby area expressed
concern that the site is contaminating their well water and a nearby
lake; the resident requested that the well water be tested. EPA and the
state do not believe this area to be contaminated as explained to the
commenter, and the state and county have offered to conduct sampling of
the well. EPA also received one comment with property ownership records
for Operable Unit 1, which EPA added to the deletion docket and site
file. The City of Mishawaka commented and was concerned that deleting
the Landfill Cap Area portion of the site from the NPL meant that the
landfill gas control system would be shut down. The active landfill gas
control system at the site, as well as other operation and maintenance
activities, will continue after the partial deletion. The City also
wanted to confirm that given the remaining levels of groundwater
contamination at the site, all future development in the area will need
to remain on municipal water. EPA confirmed that the groundwater
portion of the site would remain on the NPL and future development in
the area will likely need to remain on municipal water. EPA still
believes the deletion action is appropriate. A responsiveness summary
was prepared and placed in the docket, EPA-HQ-SFUND-1989-0008 on
https://www.regulations.gov, and in the Regional repository listed in
the ADDRESSES section.
    For the Fort Wayne Reduction Dump site, the closing date for
comments on the Notice of Intent to Partially Delete was August 17,
2020. Two public comments were received. One comment was from a nearby
resident who thought inspections, maintenance and monitoring would be
discontinued after the partial deletion. These activities will
continue, as described in materials contained in the deletion docket.
One public comment was received which was not related to the deletion
of the site from the NPL. EPA still believes the deletion action is
appropriate. A responsiveness summary was prepared and placed in the
docket, EPA-HQ-SFUND-1986-0005, on https://www.regulations.gov, and in
the Regional repository listed in the ADDRESSES section.
    For the Macalloy Corporation site, the closing date for comments on
the Notice of Intent to Partially Delete was August 26, 2020. One
public comment was received stating if pollutants were found during a
five-year review of the site, there should be joint and several
liability on any party found responsible for creating this pollution
retroactively and groundwater should be monitored. EPA has a Consent
Decree with the potentially responsible party group to conduct the
response and groundwater is being monitored as part of the five-year
review. EPA still believes the deletion action is appropriate. A
responsiveness summary was prepared and placed in the docket, EPA-HQ-
SFUND-2000-0006, on https://www.regulations.gov, and in the Regional
repository listed in the ADDRESSES section.
    For the Queen City Farms site, the closing date for comments on the
Notice of Intent to Partially Delete was August 13, 2020. Three public
comments were received. One comment supported the partial deletion.
Another comment expressed concerns about burning chemicals at the site
and expressed concerns that the cleanup level for polynuclear aromatic
compounds (PAHs) was not protective, requesting that EPA evaluate
whether the cleanup level for PAHs is still protective. EPA lowered the
cancer potency factor for carcinogenic PAHs based on changes to the
toxicity, so EPA believes the cleanup level chosen is protective. A
third commenter was concerned about chemical unknowns and future land
use. The Final Containment Cell area is limited to industrial use and
institutional controls restrict use of the areas to industrial use. EPA
still believes the deletion action is appropriate. A responsiveness
summary was prepared and placed in the docket, EPA-HQ-SFUND-2005-0011,
on

https://www.regulations.gov, and in the Regional repository listed in
the ADDRESSES section.
    For the Southeast Rockford Ground Water Contamination site (NPL
listing is Southeast Rockford Gd Wtr Contamination site), the closing
date for comments on the Notice of Intent to Partially Delete was July
23, 2020. One public comment was received which was not related to the
deletion of the site from the NPL and EPA still believes the deletion
action is appropriate. The comment and a memorandum documenting receipt
of the comment were prepared and placed in the docket EPA-HQ-SFUND-
1989-0008 on https://www.regulations.gov, and in the Regional
repository listed in the ADDRESSES section.
    For the U.S. Smelter & Lead Refining Inc. site, the closing date
for comments on the Notice of Intent to Partially Delete was August 7,
2020. EPA received written or verbal public comments from the East
Chicago Calumet Coalition and four individuals. EPA also received
telephone calls during the comment period from four area residents
requesting additional information about the partial deletion and their
specific properties. The comments from the East Chicago Calumet
Coalition and three residents opposed the deletion primarily based on
potential effects of area groundwater contamination and the other
portions of the site that EPA is still evaluating as part of an ongoing
investigation at another area of the site not being partially deleted.
One commenter opposed the deletion but did not include site specific
information to support the opposition. The four phone callers were
primarily requesting additional information about the partial deletion
and their specific properties; however, three of the callers verbally
expressed support for EPA's proposal to delete their properties from
the NPL. EPA still believes the deletion action is appropriate. A
responsiveness summary was prepared and placed in the docket EPA-HQ-
SFUND-2008-0577, on https://www.regulations.gov, and in the Regional
repository listed in the ADDRESSES section.
    For all other sites not specified above, no adverse comments were
received.
    EPA maintains the NPL as the list of sites that appear to present a
significant risk to public health, welfare, or the environment.
Deletion from the NPL does not preclude further remedial action.
Whenever there is a significant release from a site deleted from the
NPL, the deleted site may be restored to the NPL without application of
the hazard ranking system. Deletion of a site from the NPL does not
affect responsible party liability in the unlikely event that future
conditions warrant further actions.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations,
Natural resources, Oil pollution, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water pollution control, Water
supply.

    Dated: September 10, 2020.
Dana Stalcup,
Acting Office Director, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology
Innovation.

    For reasons set out in the preamble, 40 CFR part 300 is amended as
follows:

PART 300--NATIONAL OIL AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES POLLUTION
CONTINGENCY PLAN

0
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
13626, 77 FR 56749, 3 CFR, 2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR
54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, 3 CFR,
1987 Comp., p. 193.

0
2. Amend Appendix B to part 300 by:
0
a. In Table 1 remove the entries for ``CA'', ``Jasco Chemical Co.''
``Mountain View''; ``MN'', ``Fridley Commons Park Well Field'',
``Fridley''; ``MO'', ``Annapolis Lead Mine'' ``Annapolis''; ``MS'',
``Red Panther Chemical Company'', ``Clarksdale''; ``NM'' ``Cimarron
Mining Corp.'', ``Carrizozo''; ``OK'', ``Tulsa Fuel and
Manufacturing'', ``Collinsville'', ``WA'', ``American Crossarm &
Conduit Co.'' ``Chehalis'', and ``WA'', ``Northside Landfill'',
``Spokane''.
0
b. In Table 1 revise the entries for ``IL'', ``Southeast Rockford Gd
Wtr Contamination'', ``Rockford''; ``IN'', ``Douglass Road/Uniroyal,
Inc., Landfill'', ``Mishawaka''; ``IN'', ``Fort Wayne Reduction Dump'',
``Fort Wayne''; ``IN'', ``U.S. Smelter & Lead Refining Inc.'', ``East
Chicago''; ``MA'', ``Industri-Plex'', ``Woburn''; ``MT'', ``Anaconda
Co. Smelter'', ``Anaconda''; ``SC'', ``Macalloy Corporation'', ``North
Charleston'', and ``WA'', ``Queen City Farms'', ``Maple Valley''.
0
c. In Table 2 revise the entry for ``AL'', ``Redstone Arsenal (USARMY/
NASA)'', ``Huntsville''.
    The revisions read as follows:

Appendix B to Part 300--National Priorities List

                                       Table 1--General Superfund Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                State                          Site name                City/county              Notes (a)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *

                                                  * * * * * * *
IL...................................  Southeast Rockford Gd     Rockford................  P
                                        Wtr Contamination.

                                                  * * * * * * *
IN...................................  Douglass Road/Uniroyal,   Mishawaka...............  P
                                        Inc., Landfill.

                                                  * * * * * * *
IN...................................  Fort Wayne Reduction      Fort Wayne..............  P
                                        Dump.

                                                  * * * * * * *
IN...................................  U.S. Smelter & Lead       East Chicago............  P
                                        Refining Inc.

                                                  * * * * * * *
MA...................................  Industri-Plex...........  Woburn..................  P

                                                  * * * * * * *
MT...................................  Anaconda Co. Smelter....  Anaconda................  P

                                                  * * * * * * *
SC...................................  Macalloy Corporation....  North Charleston........  P

                                                  * * * * * * *
WA...................................  Queen City Farms........  Maple Valley............  P

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* P = Sites with partial deletion(s).

                                       Table 2--Federal Facilities Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                State                          Site name                City/county              Notes (a)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
AL...................................  Redstone Arsenal (USARMY/ Huntsville..............  P
                                        NASA).

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2020-20402 Filed 9-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 231 (Friday, December 2, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73933-73934]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26164]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0539; Airspace Docket No. 22-AAL-13]
RIN 2120-AA66

Revocation of Colored Federal Airway Green 17 (G-17); Atqasuk, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action revokes Colored Federal airway Green 17 (G-17) due
to the planned decommission of the Atqasuk, AK (ATK), Non-Directional
Beacon (NDB) in the vicinity of Atqasuk, AK.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, February 23, 2023. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11
and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Rules and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it modifies the route structure as necessary to preserve
the safe and efficient flow of air traffic within the National Airspace
System (NAS).

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for Docket
No. FAA-2022-0539 in the Federal Register (87 FR 32371; May 31, 2022),
revoking Colored Federal airway G-17 due to the planned decommissioning
of the Atqasuk, AK, NDB in the vicinity of Atqasuk, AK. Interested
parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting comments on the proposal. No comments were received.
    Green Federal airways are published in paragraph 6009(a) of FAA
Order JO 7400.11G, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15,
2022, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Colored
Federal airway listed in this document will be published subsequently
in FAA Order JO 7400.11.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September
15, 2022. FAA Order JO 7400.11G is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11G lists Class
A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This action amends 14 CFR part 71 by revoking Colored Federal
airway G-17 due to the planned decommissioning of the Atqasuk, AK, NDB
in the vicinity of Atqasuk, AK. The amendment is described below.
    G-17: G-17 extends between the Wainwright Village, AK, NDB and the
Atqasuk, AK, NDB. The airway is removed in its entirety.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this airspace action of revoking
Colored Federal airway G-17, due to the planned decommissioning of the
Atqasuk, AK, NDB, qualifies for categorical exclusion under the
National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and its
implementing regulations at 40 CFR part 1500, and in accordance with
FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures,
paragraph 5-6.5a, which categorically excludes from further
environmental impact review rulemaking actions that designate or modify
classes of airspace areas, airways, routes, and reporting points (see
14 CFR part 71, Designation of Class A, B, C, D, and E Airspace Areas;
Air Traffic Service Routes; and Reporting Points), and paragraph 5-
6.5k, which categorically excludes from further environmental review
the publication of existing air traffic control procedures that do not
essentially change existing tracks, create new tracks, change altitude,
or change concentration of aircraft on these tracks. As such, this
action is not expected to result in any potentially significant
environmental impacts. In accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, paragraph
5-2 regarding Extraordinary Circumstances, the FAA has reviewed this
action for factors and circumstances in which a normally categorically
excluded action may have a significant environmental impact requiring
further analysis. Accordingly, the FAA has determined that no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment or environmental impact study.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19,
2022, and effective September 15, 2022, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6009(a) Green Federal Airways.

* * * * *

G-17 [Removed]

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 28, 2022.
Scott M. Rosenbloom,
Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2022-26164 Filed 12-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 17, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 75)]
[Notices]
[Page 20981]
[DOCID:fr17ap08-101]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. SR-NYSEArca-2008-19]

In the Matter of: NYSE Arca, Inc.; Order of Summary Abrogation

April 11, 2008.
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Release No. 57648.
    Notice is hereby given that the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ is summarily abrogating a certain
proposed rule change of NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or
``Exchange'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On February 13, 2008, NYSE Arca filed SR-NYSEArca-2008-19. The
proposed rule change amended NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.31(x) to expand
the permissible order entry time and eligibility of its ``Primary
Only'' order type (``PO Order''). The filing was immediately effective
upon filing with the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 57377 (February 25, 2008), 73 FR 11177 (February 29, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NYSE Arca's PO Order is a market or limit order that is routed to
the primary, listing market, without sweeping the NYSE Arca book.\3\
The proposed rule change modified the PO Order type to permit PO Orders
to be entered at any time and to offer an order modifier for Users to
designate PO Orders that are eligible for entry and execution
throughout the trading day.\4\ Previously, NYSE Arca restricted PO
Orders to participation in the primary, listing market opening.
Specifically, the amended rule permits NYSE Arca Equities system Users
to enter a PO Order during any of the Exchange's trading sessions and
be routed immediately to the primary, listing market for execution. If
the order is not immediate-or-cancel, it remains at the primary,
listing market until executed or cancelled that day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ NYSE Arca Rule 7.31(x).
    \4\ See NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(yy) for the definition of ``User.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,\5\ at any time within
60 days of the date of filing a proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Act,\6\ the Commission may summarily abrogate
the change in the rules of the self-regulatory organization and require
that the proposed rule change be re-filed in accordance with the
provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Act \7\ and reviewed in
accordance with Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\8\ if it appears to the
Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Archipelago Securities, Inc. (``Arca Securities'') is a member of
the NYSE and an affiliate of the NYSE. The Commission in the past has
expressed concern about the potential for unfair competition and
conflicts of interest between an exchange's self-regulatory obligations
and its commercial interests that could exist if an exchange were
affiliated with one of its members, as well as the potential for unfair
competitive advantage that the affiliated member could have by virtue
of informational or operational advantages, or the ability to receive
preferential treatment.\9\ The proposed rule change raises this issue
by expanding the activities of Arca Securities in sending orders to its
affiliate, the NYSE. Thus, the Commission believes that the proposed
rule change should be subject to notice and comment and review pursuant
to Sections 19(b)(1) and 19(b)(2) of the Act.\10\ In addition, the
Commission believes that the issue of whether the routing of PO Orders
by Arca Securities to the NYSE is consistent with existing NYSE and
NYSE Arca rules should be subject to this same notice and comment and
review process.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53382 (February 27,
2006), 71 FR 11251 FR (March 6, 2006) (order approving SR-NYSE-2005-
77).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) and 78s(b)(2).
    \11\ See NYSE Rule 2B; NYSE Arca Rule 3.10; NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 3.10; and Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 53382, supra
note 9; 53383 (February 27, 2006), 71 FR 11271 (March 6, 2006)
(order approving SR-PCX-2005-134); and 52497 (September 22, 2005),
70 FR 56949 (September 29, 2005) (order approving SR-PCX-2005-90).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, the Commission finds that it is appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of investors, and otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, to abrogate the proposed rule
change.
    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the
Act,\12\ that File No. SR-NYSEArca-2008-19, be and hereby is, summarily
abrogated. If NYSE Arca chooses to re-file the proposed rule change, it
must do so pursuant to Sections 19(b)(1) \13\ and 19(b)(2) of the
Act.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C, 78s(b)(1).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C, 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(58).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-8215 Filed 4-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 133 (Friday, July 10, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 41617]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14927]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4543-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]

North Carolina; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-4543-DR), dated May 8, 2020, and
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued June 26, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of North Carolina is hereby amended to include the
following area among those areas determined to have been adversely
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his
declaration of May 8, 2020.

    Gaston County for Public Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-14927 Filed 7-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 140 (Monday, July 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 47491]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15602]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas and Oil Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP23-903-001.
    Applicants: White River Hub, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Errata and Amended Filing to be
effective 8/17/2023.
    Filed Date: 7/18/23.
    Accession Number: 20230718-5020.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/23.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>. The Commission's Office of Public Participation
(OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in
Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including
landowners, environmental justice communities, Tribal members and
others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission
processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such
as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is
encouraged to contact OPP at<PHONE_NUMBER> or [email protected].

    Dated: July 18, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-15602 Filed 7-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P