SF 83 SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NESHAP for Oil and Natural Gas Production ( 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HH)

1. Identification of the Information Collection 1( a) Title of the Information Collection NESHAP for Oil and Natural Gas Production ( 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HH)

1( b) Short Characterization/ Abstract The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants ( NESHAP) for Oil and Natural Gas Production, published at 40 CFR part 63, subpart HH, were proposed on February 6, 1998, and promulgated on June 17, 1999. These regulations apply to existing facilities and new facilities that are major sources of hazardous air pollutants ( HAP) and that process, upgrade, or store ( 1) hydrocarbon liquids ( with the exception of those facilities that exclusively handle black oil) to the point of custody transfer and ( 2) natural gas from the well up to and including the natural gas processing plant. New facilities include those that commenced construction or reconstruction after the date of proposal. Specifically exempted from this regulation are oil and natural gas production wells. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart HH.

In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/ operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance and are required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP.

Any owner/ operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority. In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are sent directly to the United States Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) regional office. Once received by the authority, reports are reviewed and the data is entered, analyzed, and maintained in the Air Facility System ( AFS). Information from these reports can be used by any regions, states, agencies and offices with access to AFS and may be used in determining where inspections and enforcement actions may be necessary.

Approximately 464 respondents are currently subject to the reporting requirements of this regulation, and EPA estimates that an additional 2 reporting respondents per year will become subject to the regulation in the next three years. In addition, approximately 126,136 respondents are subject only to the recordkeeping requirements of this regulation, and EPA estimates that an 2 additional 598 respondents per year will become subject to the recordkeeping requirements in the next three years. Overall, EPA estimates that approximately 126,600 respondents are subject to the regulation, and an additional 600 respondents per year will become subject to the regulation in the next three years. EPA estimates that the annual cost of this information collection will be $ 495,720 for nonlabor and $ 14,200,686 for labor, based on a labor burden of 175,907 hours, for a total annual cost of $ 14,696,406.

OMB approved the currently active ICR without any " Terms of Clearance."

2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2( a) Need/ Authority for the Collection The EPA is charged under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants. These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous air pollutants and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction. In addition, Section 114( a) states that the Administrator may require any owner/ operator subject to any requirement of this Act to:

( A) Establish and maintain such records; ( B) make such reports; ( C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; ( D) sample such emissions ( in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); ( E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; ( F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with Section 114( a)( 3); and ( G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonably require.

In the Administrator's judgment, HAP emissions from oil and natural gas production facilities cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, the NESHAP were promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR part 63, subpart HH.

2( b) Practical Utility/ Users of the Data The control of emissions of HAP from oil and natural gas production facilities requires not only the installation of properly designed equipment, but also the operation and maintenance of 3 that equipment. Emissions of HAP from oil and natural gas production facilities are the result of operation of the affected facilities. The subject standards are achieved by the capture or reduction of HAP emissions using enclosed combustion devices ( e. g., incinerators), vapor recovery devices ( e. g., carbon adsorbers), or flares, and by leak detection and repair procedures. The notifications required in the standards are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations. The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properly installed and operated, leaks are being detected and repaired, and the standards are being met. The performance test may also be observed. Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility's initial capability to comply with the emission standards. Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the standards at all times. The required operating conditions for enclosed combustion devices are a total organic carbon ( TOC) or total HAP reduction of 95 percent by weight or greater, a TOC or total HAP concentration level reduction to 20 ppm ( volume, dry basis) or less in the exhaust gases, and/ or a minimum residence time of 0.5 seconds at a minimum temperature of 760 degrees Celsius (

C). The required operating condition for vapor recovery systems ( e. g., carbon adsorbers) is a TOC or total HAP recovery efficiency of 95 percent or greater. The required operating conditions for flares are no visible emissions and a flame must be present at all times. The required operating condition for closed vent systems is for emissions to be non detectable.

The required semiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess emissions, identify problems at the facility, verify operation/ maintenance procedures and for compliance determinations. The information generated by the monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements described in this ICR is used by the Agency to ensure that facilities affected by the NESHAP continue to operate the control equipment in compliance with the regulation. Adequate monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting are necessary to ensure compliance with the applicable regulations, as required by the Clean Air Act. The information collected from recordkeeping and reporting requirements is also used for targeting inspections, and is of sufficient quality to be used as evidence in court.

3. Non duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR part 63, subpart HH.

3( a) Non duplication If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directly to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directly to the delegated state or local agency. If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a copy of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, no duplication 4 exists.

3( b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this ICR was published in the Federal Register ( 69 FR 69909) on December 1, 2004. No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register.

3( c) Consultations In addition to holding a public comment period following the First Federal Register Notice ( FFRN), EPA contacted the American Petroleum Institute ( API), the American Gas Association ( AGA), and the Gas Processors Association ( GPA) to determine whether it would be possible for the Agency to reduce the recordkeeping and reporting burden or improve the language in the standards to facilitate industry compliance. API declined to provide comments on the NESHAP. EPA did not receive a response from AGA. EPA received the following comment regarding the burden associated with the recordkeeping and reporting requirements of this subpart from a member of GPA, Don Anderson, Western Gas Resources, Inc. ( 303 450 8411):

Overlap between subparts HH and ZZZZ ( NESHAP for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines) creates an unnecessary burden. Under subpart HH, natural gas processing plants had to include all HAP emissions in determining applicability, including formaldehyde emissions from compressor engines. These engines are now controlled under subpart ZZZZ; however, subpart HH still requires respondents to file semiannual and annual reports, create startup/ shutdown/ malfunction plans, and maintain records.

3( d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequently, the likelihood of detecting poor operation and maintenance of control equipment and noncompliance would decrease.

3( e) General Guidelines None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements violate any of the regulations established by OMB at 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5. 5 These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and notifications for at least five years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards. EPA believes that the five year records retention requirement is consistent the Part 70 permit program and the five year statute of limitations on which the permit program is based. Also, the retention of records for five years would allow EPA to establish the compliance history of a source and any pattern of compliance for purposes of determining the appropriate level of enforcement action. Historically, EPA has found that the most flagrant violators frequently have violations extending beyond the five years. EPA would be prevented from pursuing the worst violators due to the destruction or nonexistence of records if records were retained for less than five years.

3( f) Confidentiality Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B  Confidentiality of Business Information ( see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).

3( g) Sensitive Questions None of the reporting or recordkeeping requirements contain sensitive questions.

4. The Respondents and the Information Requested 4( a) Respondents/ SIC Codes The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are owners or operators of oil and natural gas production facilities. The SIC codes for the respondents affected by the standards are SIC ( United States Standard Industrial Classification) 1311 and 1321, which correspond to NAICS ( The North American Industry Classification System) 211111 and 211112, respectively, for crude petroleum/ natural gas extraction and natural gas liquid extraction.

4( b) Information Requested ( i) Data Items All data in this ICR that are recorded and/ or reported are required by the NESHAP for Oil and Natural Gas Production ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart HH). 6 A source must make the following reports:

Notification Reports Notification of Compliance Status Report 63.9( h), 63.769( c), 61.247( a), 63.772( e)( 3), 63.772( e)( 4), 63.773( c)( 2), 63.775( b)( 4), 63.775( d)

Notification of change in compliance demonstration method for control device performance 63.772( f)

Notification of process change 63.775( f)

Initial notification for existing affected sources 63.9( b)( 2), 63.775( b)( 1)

Notification of date of continuous monitoring system performance evaluation 63.8( e)( 2), 63.9( g)( 1), 63.775( b)( 2)

Notification of planned date of performance test 63.7( b), 63.9( e), 63.775( b)( 3)

Application for approval of construction/ reconstruction 63.5( d)( 1)

Results of performance test 63.7( g), 63.10( d)( 2)

Results of performance evaluation 63.8( e)( 5), 63.10( e)

Notification of intent to construct or reconstruct 63.9( b)( 4)( i), 63.9( b)( 5)( i)

Notification of actual date of startup 63.9( b)( 4)( v), 63.9( b)( 5)( ii)

Notification of special compliance requirements 63.9( d) 7 Reports Semiannual Periodic Reports 63.769( c), 61.247( b), 63.772( f), 63.773( c)( 2), 63.775( b)( 5), 63.775( d)( 3)( ii), 63.775( e)

Semiannual startup, shutdown, and malfunction reports 63.6( e)( 3)( iv), 63.10( d)( 5), 63.775( b)( 6)

Semiannual excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report 63.8( c)( 8), 63.10( e)( 3)

Semiannual HAP summary report 63.10( e)( 3)( vi)

A source must keep the following records:

Recordkeeping Startup, Shutdown, or Malfunction Plan 63.6( e)( 3), 63.8( c)( 1)( iii), 63.762( d)

Records for exempt glycol dehydration units 63.764( e)( 1), 63.774( d)( 1)

Records for exempt ancillary equipment and compressors 63.764( e)( 2), 63.774( d)( 2)

Records of glycol dehydration unit baseline operations ( alternative standards) 63.771( e)( 1), 63.774( b)( 10)

Records of conditions for which glycol dehydration unit baseline operations shall be modified to achieve 95% HAP emission reduction ( alternative standards) 63.771( e)( 2)

Records to demonstrate that glycol dehydration unit operates under conditions for HAP reduction ( alternative standards) 63.771( e)( 3), 63.774( b)( 11) 8 Recordkeeping Documentation of control device design analysis 63.769( c), 61.246( d), 63.772( e)( 4)

Records relating to startup, shutdown, and malfunction periods; maintenance; compliance measurements; performance tests and evaluations; calibrations and adjustments 63.10( b)( 2), 63.774( b)( 2)

Records of periods when monitoring systems are not operating ( breakdowns, repairs, startup, shutdown, malfunctions, etc.) 63.10( c), 63.774( b)( 3)

Records of control device operating parameters  continuous and daily average ( except flares) 63.774( b)( 4)( i) and ( ii)

Records of flare design, visible emissions, heat content, flowrate, exit velocity, pilot flame outages ( flares only) 63.774( b)( 4)( i) and ( ii), 63.774( e)

Records of 365 day rolling average condenser efficiency ( condensers only) 63.774( b)( 4)( ii)( B)

Records of flow indicator operation, flow detection, vent stream diversions 63.774( b)( 4)( iii)

Records of inspections of seals or closure mechanisms, records of broken/ changed/ checked out seals/ valves/ locks 63.774( b)( 4)( iv)

Records of unsafe to inspect parts 63.773( c)( 7), 63.774( b)( 5)

Records of difficult to inspect parts 63.773( c)( 7), 63.774( b)( 6)

Records of leak or defect detection and repair 63.769( c), 61.246, 63.773( c)( 7), 63.774( b)( 7)

Records of inspections during which no leaks or defects were detected 63.773( c)( 7), 63.774( b)( 8)

Records of compliance with benzene emission limit ( alternative standards) 63.774( c) 9 Recordkeeping Site specific performance evaluation test plan 63.7( c)( 2), 63.8( d)( 2), 63.8( e)( 3)( i)

Records of results of performance test 63.7( g)( 3)

Continuous monitoring system quality control program 63.8( d)

Records of continuous monitoring system performance 63.10( c)

Electronic Reporting At the present, respondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data ( e. g., temperature). Although personnel at the affected facility must evaluate the data, this internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping at the plant site.

Also, regulatory agencies, in cooperation with the respondents, continue to create reporting systems to transmit data electronically. However, these electronic reporting systems are still not widely used. At this time, it is estimated that approximately 10 percent of the respondents use electronic reporting.

( ii) Respondent Activities Respondent Activities Read instructions.

Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate closed vent systems and CMS to: 1) achieve a 95% reduction in HAP, TOC, or total HAP, for control devices and vapor recovery devices; 2) achieve a reduction to 20 ppm or less of TOC or total HAP, and operates at a minimum residence time of 0.5 seconds at a minimum temperature of 760 degrees Celsius for combustion devices.

Perform initial performance tests, and repeat performance tests if necessary ( using Method( s) 1, 1A; 2, 2A, 2C or 2D; or either Method 18 or 25A: located at 40 CFR part 60, appendix A).

Write the notifications and reports listed above. 10 Respondent Activities Enter information required to be recorded above.

Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of disclosing and providing information.

Adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements.

Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information.

Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information.

The rule does not require use of information collection techniques such as automated, mechanical, or other technical collection techniques. Electronic submissions can be made but they must be followed up with a hard copy that is signed by the owner/ operator of the facility.

5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management 5( a) Agency Activities EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analysis, storage, and distribution of the required information.

Agency Activities Observe initial performance tests and repeat performance tests if necessary.

Conduct on site inspections as necessary.

Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry. 11 Agency Activities Audit facility records.

Input, analyze, and maintain data in the Air Facility System ( AFS).

5( b) Collection Methodology and Management Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority might inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are properly installed and operated. Performance test reports are used by the Agency to discern a source's initial capability to comply with the emission standard, and serve as a record of the operating conditions under which compliance was achieved. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.

Information contained in the reports is entered into the AFS, which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance. AFS is EPA's database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government owned facilities. EPA uses the AFS for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement by local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data.

The records required by this regulation must be retained by the owner/ operator for five years.

5( c) Small Entity Flexibility There is a distribution of business sizes among the respondents. At the time of rulemaking, the Agency estimated that the number of affected small entities would likely be minimal due to several considerations in these rules that minimize the burden on all firms, both small and large. These considerations include exempting from the control, monitoring, and reporting requirements of the NESHAP those glycol dehydration units below certain thresholds for natural gas throughput ( less than 85 thousand standard cubic meters per day) or benzene emissions ( less than 0.90 megagram per year). The Agency considers the remaining recordkeeping requirements the minimum needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small entities. To the extent that larger businesses can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be reduced.

5( d) Collection Schedule 12 The specific frequency for each information collection activity within this request is shown in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost, NESHAP for Oil and Natural Gas Production ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart HH), attached.

6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this ICR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Where appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory.

The Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.

6( a) Estimating Respondent Burden The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated to be 175,907 hours ( Total Labor Hours from Table 1). These hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previously approved ICR, and any comments received.

6( b) Estimating Respondent Costs ( i) Estimating Labor Costs This ICR uses the following labor rates:

Managerial $ 97.46 ($ 46.41 + 110%) Technical $ 83.71 ($ 39.86 + 110%) Clerical $ 42.55 ($ 20.26 + 110%)

These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 19, 2005, " Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group." The rates are from column 1, " Total compensation." The rates have been increased by 110% to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.

( ii) Estimating Capital/ Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs 13 The type of industry costs associated with the information collection activities in the subject standards are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs associated with continuous monitoring. The capital/ startup costs are one time costs when a facility becomes subject to the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitors and other costs such as photocopying and postage.

( iii) Capital/ Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance ( O& M) Costs Capital/ Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance ( O& M) Costs ( A) Continuous Monitoring Device ( B) Capital/ Startup Cost for One Respondent ( C) Number of New Respondents ( D) Total Capital/ Startup Cost, ( B X C) ( E) Annual O& M Costs for One Respondent ( F) Number of Respondents with O& M ( G) Total O& M, ( E X F)

THC analyzer $ 10,200 2 $ 20,400 $ 1,020 466 $ 475,320 Cost information in the above table is from the EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, January 2002, " Table 4.12: Default Analyzer and Monitor Equipment Costs for CEMS ($)." The Agency assumes that all respondents utilize an organic monitoring device to measure the concentration level of organic compounds in the exhaust vent stream. The Agency estimates the cost for a TOC/ HAP monitor based on the cost of a total hydrocarbon ( THC) analyzer.

The total capital/ startup costs for this ICR are $ 20,400. This is the total of column D in the above table. These costs are shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 14( a), Total annualized capital/ startup costs.

The total operation and maintenance ( O& M) costs for this ICR are $ 475,320. This is the total of column G. These costs are shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 14( b), Total annual costs ( O& M).

The total respondent costs in block 14 have been calculated as the addition of the capital/ startup costs, and the annual operation and maintenance costs. The average annual cost for capital/ startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 495,720. This cost is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 14( c), Total annualized cost requested. The numbers in block 14 of the OMB 83 I form are rounded to show the cost in thousands of dollars.

6( c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost 14 1 Original ICR supporting statement ( http:// www. epa. gov/ icr/ icrs/ icrpages/ 1788ss02. htm)

2 Background Information for Proposed Standards, U. S. EPA, April 1997, EPA 453/ R 94 079a. The only costs to the Agency are those costs associated with analysis of the reported information. EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program includes activities such as the examination of records maintained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information.

The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 174,922.

This cost is based on the average hourly labor rate as follows:

Managerial $ 56.02 ( GS 13, Step 5, $ 35.01 x 1.6) Technical $ 41.57 ( GS 12, Step 1, $ 25.98 x 1.6) Clerical $ 22.50 ( GS 6, Step 3, $ 14.06 x 1.6)

These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management ( OPM) " 2005 General Schedule" which excludes locality rates of pay. Details upon which this estimate is based appear in Table 2: Annual Agency Burden and Cost, NESHAP for Oil and Natural Gas Production ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart HH), attached.

6( d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs Based on our research for this ICR, approximately 464 existing sources are currently subject to the standard. It is estimated that an additional 2 sources per year will become subject to the standard in the next three years.

At the time of rulemaking, EPA estimated the source category comprised 120,000 facilities, of which EPA expected approximately 440 would be subject to the NESHAP. 1 EPA based these estimates on 1992 data that indicated there were 590,000 oil production wells and 280,000 natural gas production wells in the U. S. ( 870,000 production wells total). 2 Based on these data, there were 7.25 wells per facility ( 870,000 wells / 120,000 facilities = 7.25), or, alternatively, 0.1379 facilities per well ( 120,000 / 870,000 = 0.1379). Of these facilities, 0.3667 percent were subject to the NESHAP ( 440 / 120,000 = 0.003667).

According to data for 2003, there are 524,556 oil production wells and 393,327 natural 15 3 Worldwide Production report, Oil & Gas Journal, December 20, 2004.

4 Number of Producing Gas and Gas Condensate Wells, Energy Information Administration, U. S. DOE, April 28, 2005. gas production wells in the U. S. ( 917,883 production wells total). 3,4 Using these well data and the ratio describe above, EPA currently estimates there are 126,600 facilities in the source category ( 917,883 x 0.1379 = 126,600 facilities). Of these facilities, 464 are subject to the NESHAP ( 126,600 x 0.003667 = 464). EPA assumes as an upper bound that the other 126,136 existing facilities in the source category are exempt facilities under 40 CFR 63.760( e), which must maintain records of their applicability determination as required in 40 CFR 63.10( b)( 3). Some of these 126,136 facilities may be area sources, which are not required to maintain records under the NESHAP. EPA does not have the data to quantify how many of these facilities are area sources, and therefore, assumes that all 126,136 are major sources exempt under 40 CFR 63.760( e).

EPA's current estimate for the number of facilities in the source category is 6,600 facilities higher than the estimate at the time of rulemaking ( 126,600  120,000 = 6,600). Dividing by 11 years ( 2003  1992 = 11), EPA estimates there are approximately 600 new facilities per year in the source category ( 6,600 / 11 = 600). Similarly, EPA's estimate of the number of subject facilities increased by 24 facilities ( 464  440 = 24), or 2 new subject facilities per year ( 24 / 11 = 2). EPA assumes as an upper bound that the other 598 new facilities per year are exempt facilities under 40 CFR 63.760( e), which must maintain records of their applicability determination as required in 40 CFR 63.10( b)( 3).

Number of respondents is calculated using the following table, which addresses the three years covered by this ICR.

Number of Respondents Respondents That Submit Reports Respondents That Do Not Submit Any Reports Year ( A) Number of New Respondents ( B) Number of Existing Respondents ( C) Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports ( D) Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents ( E) Number of Respondents ( E= A+ B+ C D)

1 2 464 126,136 0 126,602 2 2 466 126,734 0 127,202 3 2 468 127,332 0 127,802 16 Number of Respondents Average 2 466 126,734 0 127,202 To avoid double counting respondents column D is subtracted. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three year period of this ICR is 127,202. This number appears on the OMB 83 I form in block 13( a), Number of respondents.

The total number of annual responses per year is calculated using the following table:

Total Annual Responses ( A)

Information Collection Activity ( B)

Number of Respondents ( C)

Number of Responses ( D) Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports ( E) Total Annual Responses E=( BxC)+ D Notification of intent to construct or reconstruct 2 1 N/ A 2 Notification of actual date of startup 2 1 N/ A 2 Notification of date of continuous monitoring system performance evaluation 2 1 N/ A 2 Notification of planned date of performance test 2 1 N/ A 2 Notification of Compliance Status Report 2 1 N/ A 2 Semiannual Reports 466 2 N/ A 932 Total 942 The number of Total Annual Responses is 942. This number is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 13( b), Total annual responses.

The Total Hours Requested is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 13( c). The total annual labor costs are $ 14,200,686. The annual labor costs are not shown on the OMB 83 I form. Details regarding these estimates may be found in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost, NESHAP for Oil and Natural Gas Production ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart HH), attached. 17 The total annual capital/ startup and O& M costs to the regulated entities are $ 495,720. This number is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 14( c), Total annualized cost requested. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6( b)( iii), Capital/ Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance ( O& M) Costs.

The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 4,315 labor hours at a cost of $ 174,922. See Table 2: Annual Agency Burden and Cost, NESHAP for Oil and Natural Gas Production ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart HH), attached.

6( e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively, and summarized below.

( i) Respondent Tally The Total Hours Requested is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 13( c). The total annual labor costs are $ 14,200,686. The annual labor costs are not shown on the OMB 83 I form. Details regarding these estimates may be found in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost, NESHAP for Oil and Natural Gas Production ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart HH), attached. Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 187 hours per response.

The total annual capital/ startup and O& M costs to the regulated entity are $ 495,720. This number is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 14( c), Total annualized cost requested. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6( b)( iii), Capital/ Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance ( O& M) Costs.

( ii) The Agency Tally The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 4,315 labor hours at a cost of $ 174,922. See Table 2: Annual Agency Burden and Cost, NESHAP for Oil and Natural Gas Production ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart HH), attached.

6( f) Reasons for Change in Burden The increase in burden from the most recently approved ICR is due to seven adjustments. Four adjustments contributed increases in burden and three adjustments contributed decreases in burden, for a net increase in burden. 18 The first adjustment increased the burden due to the consideration of the recordkeeping burden on respondents that are below certain thresholds for facility throughput ( less than 18.4 thousand standard cubic meters of natural gas per day or less than 39,700 liters of hydrocarbon liquid per day), or are black oil facilities. These facilities are exempt from the emission reduction requirements of the NESHAP under 40 CFR 63.760( e), but must maintain records of annual emissions estimates and actual throughput as required in 40 CFR 63.10( b)( 3). EPA estimates that 126,734 facilities will spend one hour once per year to maintain these records under the NESHAP. This burden was not included in the original or active ICR.

The second and third adjustments are changes in the calculations for labor burden and cost. The second adjustment contributed an increase in burden due to the increase in labor rates. Industry labor rates increased by an average of 31.6 percent from the active ICR, while the Agency labor rates increased by 12.4 percent from the active ICR. The third adjustment contributed an increase in burden by calculating both the industry and Agency technical labor hours at a higher level relative to total labor hours than in the active ICR.

The fourth adjustment contributed a decrease in burden due to a decrease in the number of subject facilities. The active ICR estimated that 484 existing facilities were subject to the rule and that 14 new facilities would become subject to the rule over the past three years. EPA now estimates that there are 464 existing facilities ( i. e., respondents), and that 2 new facilities per year are expected in the next three years.

The fifth adjustment contributed a decrease in burden due to the removal of LDAR monitoring requirements from the burden calculations. LDAR monitoring activities are required to comply with the NESHAP, not to show compliance with the NESHAP; therefore, EPA has removed these activities from the burden calculations. LDAR recordkeeping activities remain in the burden calculations.

The sixth and seventh adjustments contributed an increase and decrease in burden, respectively, due to the use of the EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual. The capital costs for THC analyzers are higher than the costs in the active ICR for monitoring devices for enclosed combustion devices, vapor recovery units, and flares, but the O& M costs are lower for THC analyzers. The decrease in O& M costs offset the increase in capital costs, for a net decrease in non labor costs. The active ICR did not reference the EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual.

6( g) Burden Statement The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 187 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, 19 install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA's regulations are listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number OECA 2004 0038, which is available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center ( EPA/ DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4: 30 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is ( 202) 566 1744, and the telephone number for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center is ( 202) 566 1752. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA Dockets ( EDOCKET) at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket. Use EDOCKET to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. When in the system, select " search," then key in the Docket ID Number identified above. Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number OECA 2004 0038 and OMB Control Number 2060 0417 in any correspondence.

Part B of the Supporting Statement This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information. 20 Table 1. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost, NESHAP for Oil and Natural Gas Production ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart HH)

Activity ( A) Technical Hrs/ Occurrence ( B) Occurrences / Respondent / Yr. ( C) Hours/ Respondent / Yr.

[ C = A x B] ( D) Number of Respondents ( E) Technical Hrs/ Yr.

[ E = C x D] ( F) Management Hours/ Yr.

[ F = 0.05 x E] ( G) Clerical Hours/ Yr.

[ G = 0.1 x E] ( H) 1 Total Labor Costs/ Yr.

($)

1. Applications Not applicable 2. Survey and Studies Not applicable 3. Reporting Requirements a. Read instructions 4 1 4 466 1,864 93 186 173,050 b. Required activities Not applicable c. Create information Not applicable d. Gather existing information 8 1 8 466 3,728 186 373 346,100 e. Write reports i. Notification of construction/ reconstruction 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 371 ii. Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 371 iii. Notification of date of CMS performance evaluation 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 371 iv. Notification of planned date of performance test 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 371 v. Notification of Compliance Status Report 4 1 4 2 8 0.4 0.8 743 vi. Startup/ shutdown/

malfunction reports2 2 2 4 466 1,864 93 186 173,050 vi. Semiannual Periodic 2 2 4 466 1,864 93 186 173,050 Table 1. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost, NESHAP for Oil and Natural Gas Production ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart HH)

21 Activity ( A) Technical Hrs/ Occurrence ( B) Occurrences / Respondent / Yr. ( C) Hours/ Respondent / Yr.

[ C = A x B] ( D) Number of Respondents ( E) Technical Hrs/ Yr.

[ E = C x D] ( F) Management Hours/ Yr.

[ F = 0.05 x E] ( G) Clerical Hours/ Yr.

[ G = 0.1 x E] ( H) 1 Total Labor Costs/ Yr.

($)

Report 4. Recordkeeping Requirements a. Read instructions See 3a b. Plan activities 16 1 16 2 32 2 3 2,971 c. Implement activities Not applicable d. Develop record system i. Control equipment 8 1 8 2 16 0.8 2 1,485 ii. LDAR program 13 1 13 2 26 1 3 2,414 e. Enter information i. Cover designs 8 1 8 2 16 0.8 2 1,485 ii. Control device design 8 1 8 2 16 0.8 2 1,485 iii. Control equipment testing 1 1 1 2 2 0.1 0.2 186 iv. Control equipment inspection 1 2 2 466 932 47 93 86,525 v. Control equipment monitoring 1 2 2 466 932 47 93 86,525 vi. Control device CMS 1 12 12 466 5,592 280 559 519,150 vii. LDAR program 1 12 12 466 5,592 280 559 519,150 f. Train personnel 8 1 8 466 3,728 186 373 346,100 g. Perform audits Not applicable Table 1. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost, NESHAP for Oil and Natural Gas Production ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart HH)

22 Activity ( A) Technical Hrs/ Occurrence ( B) Occurrences / Respondent / Yr. ( C) Hours/ Respondent / Yr.

[ C = A x B] ( D) Number of Respondents ( E) Technical Hrs/ Yr.

[ E = C x D] ( F) Management Hours/ Yr.

[ F = 0.05 x E] ( G) Clerical Hours/ Yr.

[ G = 0.1 x E] ( H) 1 Total Labor Costs/ Yr.

($)

h. Retain records of emissions estimates and actual throughput ( facilities exempt under 63.760( e)) 1 1 1 126,734 126,734 6,337 12,673 11,765,731 TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST ( rounded) 175,907 $ 14,200,686 1. This cost is based on the sum of personnel hours multiplied by their hourly labor rates ( Technical hours x $ 83.71) + ( Management hours x $ 97.46) + ( Clerical hours x $ 42.55)].

2. Startup/ shutdown/ malfunction reports may be included as part of the semiannual periodic reports. Table 2. Annual Agency Burden and Cost, NESHAP for Oil and Natural Gas Production ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart HH)

23 Activity ( A) Technical Hrs/ Occurrence ( B) Occurrences / Respondent / Yr. ( C) Hours/ Respondent / Yr.

[ C = A x B] ( D) Number of Respondents ( E) Technical Hrs/ Yr.

[ E = C x D] ( F) Management Hours/ Yr.

[ F = 0.05 x E] ( G) Clerical Hours/ Yr.

[ G = 0.1 x E] ( H) 1 Total Labor Costs/ Yr.

($)

1. Review reports a. Initial notification 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 186 b. Preconstruction review application 4 1 4 2 8 0.4 0.8 373 c. Performance test notification 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 186 d. Compliance status notification 4 1 4 2 8 0.4 0.8 373 e. Startup/ shutdown/ malfunction reports2 2 2 4 466 1,864 93 186 86,902 f. Semiannual periodic reports 2 2 4 466 1,864 93 186 86,902 TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST ( rounded) 4,315 $ 174,922 1. This cost is based on the sum of personnel hours multiplied by their hourly labor rates [( Technical hours x $ 41.57) + ( Management hours x $ 56.02) + ( Clerical hours x $ 22.50)].

2. Startup/ shutdown/ malfunction reports may be included as part of the semiannual periodic reports.


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 17, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45858-45860]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17519]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0316; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-00461-E;
Amendment 39-21657; AD 2021-15-10]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; GE Aviation Czech s.r.o. (Type
Certificate Previously Held by WALTER Engines a.s., Walter a.s., and
MOTORLET a.s.) Turboprop Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
GE Aviation Czech s.r.o. (GEAC) H75-200, H80-100, and H80-200 model
turboprop engines. This AD was prompted by several reports of engine
gas generator speed (Ng) rollbacks occurring below idle on GEAC H75-
200, H80-100, and H80-200 model turboprop engines. This AD requires an
inspection of a certain part number (P/N) fuel control unit (FCU) and,
if deficiencies are detected, replacement of the FCU with a part
eligible for installation. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective September 21, 2021.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of September
21, 2021.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact GE Aviation Czech, Beranov[yacute]ch 65 199 02 Praha 9--
Let[ncaron]any, Czech Republic; phone: +420 222 538 111. You may view
this service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(781) 238-7759. It is also available at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0316.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0316; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, the
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments
received, and other information. The address for Docket Operations is
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Caufield, Aviation Safety
Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all GEAC H75-200, H80-
100, and H80-200 model turboprop engines. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on April 20, 2021 (86 FR 20465). The NPRM was prompted
by several reports of engine gas generator speed (Ng) rollbacks
occurring below idle on GEAC H75-200, H80-100, and H80-200 model
turboprop engines. The NPRM proposed to require an inspection of a
certain P/N FCU and, if deficiencies are detected, replacement of the
FCU with a part eligible for installation. The FAA is issuing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these products.
    The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the
Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has
issued EASA AD 2020-0082, dated April 1, 2020 (referred to after this
as ``the MCAI''), to address the unsafe condition on these products.
The MCAI states:

    Several occurrences have been reported of engine gas generator
speed (Ng) rollbacks below idle on engines equipped with an affected
part.
    The investigation determined that, during these events, the
engine control lever (ECL) was set to idle, and identified as
contributing factors specific environmental temperatures, possibly
in combination with a high power off-take. The idle setting may be
used in flight, in particular during the approach phase.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, may lead to loss
of engine power and eventually, on a single engine aeroplane,
possibly result in loss of control.
    To address this potential unsafe condition, GEAC issued the ASB
providing applicable instructions.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2021-0316.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the costs.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety
requires adopting this AD as proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. This AD is
adopted as proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed GE Aviation Czech Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No.
ASB-H80-73-00-00-0052[00]/ASB-H75-73-00-00-0022[00] (single document),
Revision 00, dated February 6, 2020. The service information specifies
procedures for performing a functional inspection of the FCU, P/N LUN
6590.07-8, and replacing the FCU. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal

course of business or by the means identified in ADDRESSES.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 33 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry.
    The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Functional Inspection of FCU..........  0.50 work-hours x $85                 $0          $42.50       $1,402.50
                                         per hour = $42.50.
Replace FCU...........................  4 work-hours x $85 per            25,000          25,340         836,220
                                         hour = $340.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2021-15-10 GE Aviation Czech s.r.o. (Type Certificate previously
held by WALTER Engines a.s., Walter a.s., and MOTORLET a.s.):
Amendment 39-21657; Docket No. FAA-2021-0316; Project Identifier
MCAI-2020-00461-E.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective September 21,
2021.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to GE Aviation Czech s.r.o. (GEAC) (Type
Certificate previously held by WALTER Engines a.s., Walter a.s., and
MOTORLET a.s.) H75-200, H80-100, and H80-200 model turboprop
engines.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7321, Fuel Control/
Turbine Engines.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by several reports of engine gas generator
speed (Ng) rollbacks below idle on GEAC H75-200, H80-100, and H80-
200 model turboprop engines with a fuel control unit (FCU), part
number (P/N) LUN 6590.07-8, installed. The FAA is issuing this AD to
prevent engine Ng rollbacks below idle on engines equipped with an
FCU, P/N LUN 6590.07-8. The unsafe condition, if not addressed,
could result in loss of engine power and loss of control of the
airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    (1) Within 100 flight hours (FHs) after the effective date of
this AD, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100 FHs since the
previous inspection, perform a functional inspection of the FCU, P/N
LUN 6590.07-8, using the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
2.1.1, Ground Check Procedure, of GE Aviation Czech Alert Service
Bulletin No. ASB-H80-73-00-00-0052[00]/ASB-H75-73-00-00-0022[00]
(single document), Revision 00, dated February 6, 2020 (the ASB).
    (2) If, during any functional inspection required by paragraph
(g)(1) of this AD, the engine Ng is:
    (i) Equal to or greater than 57% up to and including 60%, then
no further action is required.
    (ii) Equal to or greater than 55% but lower than 57%, then
follow the steps 1 through 3 under ``Ng speed is equal to or above
55% and below 57%'' in the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
2.1.2, Ground check results evaluation, of the ASB.
    (iii) Below 55%, then follow steps 1 and 2 under ``Ng speed is
below 55%'' in the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 2.1.2,
Ground check results evaluation, of the ASB.
    Note 1 to paragraph (g)(2): In the Accomplishment Instructions,
paragraph 2.1.2, of the ASB, where the ASB states ``Do steps 1 thru
8 after the FCU adjustment,'' do steps 1 through 7 of the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 2.1.1, in the ASB.
    (3) During the next engine overhaul, or within 44 months,
whichever occurs first after the effective date of this AD, remove
the FCU, P/N LUN 6590.07-8, and replace it with a part eligible for
installation.

(h) Installation Prohibition

    After the effective date of this AD, do not install an FCU, P/N
LUN 6590.07-8, onto any engine.

(i) Definition

    For the purpose of this AD, a part eligible for installation is
an FCU, P/N LUN 6590.71-8.

(j) Terminating Action

    Installing a part eligible for installation onto an engine as
required by paragraph (g)(2) or (3) of this AD, as applicable,
constitutes terminating action for the functional inspections
required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD for that engine.

(k) No Reporting Requirements

    The reporting requirements specified in paragraph 2.1.2 of the
ASB are not required by this AD.

(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in Related Information. You may email your request to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(m) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Barbara
Caufield, Aviation Safety Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (781) 238-
7199; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Refer to European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2020-0082, dated April 1, 2020, for more information. You may
examine the EASA AD in the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0316.

(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) GE Aviation Czech Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB-H80-73-00-
00-0052[00]/ASB-H75-73-00-00-0022[00] (single document), Revision
00, dated February 6, 2020.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For GE Aviation Czech service information identified in this
AD, contact GE Aviation Czech, Beranov[yacute]ch 65 199 02 Praha 9--
Let[ncaron]any, Czech Republic; phone: +420 222 538 111.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on July 15, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-17519 Filed 8-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: June 28, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 124)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 37661-37663]
[DOCID:fr28jn11-21]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

49 CFR Parts 105, 107, 109, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 178, and
180

[Docket No. PHMSA-2011-0132; Notice No. 11-5]

Notification of Anticipated Delay in Administrative Appeal
Decisions

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that PHMSA is currently
reviewing numerous administrative appeals (i.e., petitions for
reconsideration) on recently issued final rules. In accordance with
applicable regulatory requirements, this notice provides notification
to parties having brought certain administrative appeals of the
anticipated delay in processing these administrative appeals.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles E. Betts, Director, Standards
and Rulemaking Division, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, (202)
366-4512, PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Appeals

    The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration's
(PHMSA) Office of Hazardous Materials Standards recently received a
number of petitions for reconsideration of several recent PMHSA final
rules, which are known as ``administrative appeals'' under PHMSA's
applicable regulations, 49 CFR 106.110 et seq. The administrative
appeals that are the subject of this Federal Register notice focus on
four recently published final rules. Key information on the
administrative appeals, including the rulemaking docket number, are
provided below. Interested persons may go to http://www.regulations.gov
and search by the rulemaking docket number to view rulemakings,
administrative appeals, comments, and other rulemaking related
documentation. The administrative appeals now being considered by
PHMSA, organized by final rule, are as follows:

HM-231 (Docket No. PHMSA-2006-25736)

 Hazardous Materials; Miscellaneous Packaging Amendments (September 30,
                           2010; 75 FR 60333)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Appeal from                             Issue
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dangerous Goods Advisory       Appeal focuses on the miscellaneous
 Council (DGAC).                packaging requirements final rule
                                pertaining to PHMSA's responsiveness to
                                the request to extend the effective date
                                of the final rule and revisions to the
                                final rule in a manner not previously
                                proposed or requested.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

HM-233B (Docket No. PHMSA-2009-0410)

Hazardous Materials; Revisions of Special Permits Procedures (January 5,
                            2011; 76 FR 454)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Appeals from                            Issue
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Council on Safe                Appeal focuses on the special permit
 Transportation of Hazardous    procedures final rule provisions
 Articles, Inc. (COSTHA).       addressing:
                                Estimating operations to be
                                conducted under a special permit.
                                Listing the CEO or president of
                                the company.
                                Providing a Dun and Bradstreet
                                Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
                                identifier.
Institute of Makers of         Appeal focuses on the special permit
 Explosives (IME).              procedures final rule provisions
                                addressing:
                                Listing all known locations
                                where a special permit will be used.
                                Providing a description of
                                operational controls.
                                Providing a statement outlining
                                the reason(s) the hazardous material is
                                being transported by air.
Association of Hazmat          Appeal focuses on the special permit
 Shippers, Inc. (AHS).          procedures final rule provisions
                                addressing:
                                Listing all known locations
                                where a special permit will be used.
                                Providing estimates of the
                                number of operations expected to be
                                conducted under a special permit.
                                Providing a hazardous materials
                                registration number.
                                Providing a statement justifying
                                shipments by air.
                                Listing the CEO or president of
                                the company.
                                Providing a DUNS identifier.
                                Providing a quantity or number
                                of packages to be shipped.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

HM-215K (Docket No. PHMSA-2009-0126)

       Hazardous Materials; Harmonization With the United Nations
   Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, International
Maritime Dangerous Goods Code, International Civil Aviation Organization
 Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air
                     (January 19, 2011; 76 FR 3308)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Appeals from                            Issue
------------------------------------------------------------------------
American Coatings Association  Appeal focuses on the international
 (ACA).                         harmonization final rule pertaining to
                                PHMSA's decision to eliminate the ORM-D
                                system ``without any [PHMSA] debate or
                                consideration of [1] the type of
                                materials that use this exception; [2]
                                the costs incurred by the regulated
                                community; and [3] the safety
                                benefits.'' ACA also requests, based on
                                a denial of their request to address the
                                elimination of the ORM-D system in a
                                separate rulemaking that PHMSA extend
                                the transition period for use of the ORM-
                                D system until January 1, 2016.
AHS..........................  Appeal focuses on the international
                                harmonization final rule pertaining to
                                the limited quantity exception for the
                                material ``Self-reactive solid, Type F,
                                UN3230.''
Dangerous Goods Transport      Appeal focuses on the international
 Consulting, Inc. (DGTC) on     harmonization final rule provisions
 behalf of DGAC.                addressing:
                                UN3334 (Aviation regulated
                                liquid, n.o.s.) and UN3335 (Aviation
                                regulated solid, n.o.s.) be added to the
                                list of excepted Class 9 (miscellaneous
                                hazard) material on the basis that the
                                material is authorized for limited
                                quantity exceptions under the HMR and is
                                consistent with the ICAO TI.
                                The one-year transition period
                                does not allow sufficient time to
                                deplete stock(s) of pre-printed
                                packagings.
Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy  Appeal focuses on the international
 Association (FHEA).            harmonization final rule pertaining to
                                the prohibition on air transportation of
                                fuel cell cartridges as ORM-D material
                                and the deviation from the ICAO TI and
                                the UN Model Regulations.
Lilliputian Systems, Inc.,     Appeal focuses on the international
 (LSI).                         harmonization final rule pertaining to
                                49 CFR 175.10(a)(19) to align with the
                                ICAO TI and allow spare fuel cell
                                cartridges containing Division 2.1
                                flammable gas to be carried in checked
                                baggage.
PPG Industries (PPG).........  Appeal focuses on the international
                                harmonization final rule pertaining to
                                the one-year transition period for
                                depletion of stock(s) of pre-printed
                                packagings.

Sporting Arms & Ammunition     Appeal focuses on the international
 Manufacturer's Institute       harmonization final rule provisions
 (SAAMI).                       addressing:
                                The list of prohibited hazardous
                                material and articles.
                                Exceptions from the air
                                prohibition for Table 3 in 49 CFR
                                173.27(f) pertaining to limited
                                quantities of Class 1 (explosive)
                                material conforming to 49 CFR 173.63(b)
                                and Class 7 (radioactive) material
                                conforming to 49 CFR 173.421 through
                                173.425.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

PHM-7 (Docket No. PHMSA-2005-22356)

Hazardous Materials: Enhanced Enforcement Authority Procedures (March 2,
                           2011; 76 FR 11570)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Appeals from                            Issue
------------------------------------------------------------------------
COSTHA.......................  Appeal focuses on the enhanced
                                enforcement authority procedures final
                                rule provisions addressing:
                                Package opening and reclosing by
                                carrier vs. enforcement personnel.
                                Removing a package from
                                transportation and ordering carrier
                                personnel to transport the package for
                                testing.
American Trucking              Appeal focuses on the enhanced
 Associations (ATA).            enforcement authority procedures final
                                rule provisions addressing:
                                Implementation of the authority
                                to direct carriers to transport
                                materials suspected of being hazardous
                                materials to a facility for further
                                examination.
                                Resumption of transportation for
                                a package that violates the HMR, but
                                does not present an imminent safety
                                hazard.
United Parcel Service (UPS)..  Appeal focuses on the enhanced
                                enforcement authority procedures final
                                rule provisions addressing:
                                Package opening at facilities
                                vs. road side.
                                Department of Homeland
                                Security's responsibility to open
                                packages in pursuit of security related
                                issues and possible treats.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Notification of Anticipated Delay in Appeal Decisions

    49 CFR 106.130(a)(4) provides that if PHMSA does not issue a
decision on whether to grant or deny an administrative appeal within 90
days after the date that the final rule is published in the Federal
Register and that we anticipate a substantial delay in making a
decision, PHMSA will notify parties having brought administrative
appeals directly and provide an expected decision date. In addition,
PHMSA will publish a notice of the delay in the Federal Register. Due
to the volume of appeals received, as indicated above, we anticipate
delays in making administrative appeal decisions. As a result, in
accordance with 49 CFR 106.130(a)(4), we are publishing this notice in
the Federal Register to notify the public, and we anticipate directly
contacting parties having brought these administrative appeals shortly.

    Issued in Washington, DC on June 21, 2011.
Magdy El-Sibaie,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety.
[FR Doc. 2011-15956 Filed 6-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 121 (Monday, June 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28929-28930]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13274]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Thirtieth RTCA SC-225 Rechargeable Lithium Batteries and Battery
Systems Plenary

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Thirtieth RTCA SC-225 Rechargeable Lithium Batteries and
Battery Systems Plenary.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a
meeting of Thirtieth RTCA SC-225 Rechargeable Lithium Batteries and
Battery Systems Plenary.

DATES: The meeting will be held July 11, 2017, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held virtually at: https://rtca.webex.com/rtca/j.php?MTID=m59d3f531a9ceafdb01cdb64c4c513ceb. Join
by phone, 1-877-668-4493 Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada), 1-650-
479-3208 Call-in toll number (US/Canada), Access code: 638 701 429,
Meeting Password: fEMApqR8.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karan Hofmann at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
202-330-0680, or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910,
Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax at (202)
833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is
hereby given for a meeting of the Thirtieth RTCA SC-225 Rechargeable
Lithium

Batteries and Battery Systems Plenary. The agenda will include the
following:

Tuesday, July 11, 2017--9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

1. Welcome and Administrative Remarks (Including DFO & RTCA Statement)
2. Introductions
3. Agenda Review
4. Meeting-Minutes Review
5. Final Review and Comment (FRAC) Resolution Review
6. Approval of DO-311A for Submission to RTCA PMC
7. Action Item Review
8. Any Other Business
9. Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC on June 21, 2017.
John Raper,
Branch Manager--Forecasting, Planning and Reporting (ANG-A15), Branch
Manager (acting)--Partnership Contracts Branch (ANG-A17), Management
Services Office, NextGen Organization, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017-13274 Filed 6-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 22, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62498-62500]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24744]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0708; Airspace Docket No. 13-AWP-11]

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace, Amendment of Class D
and Class E Airspace, and Revocation of Class E Airspace; Salinas, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E airspace and modify
Class E airspace at Salinas, CA, to accommodate aircraft departing and
arriving under Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) at Salinas Municipal
Airport. This action also would remove Class E airspace designated as
surface area. The geographic coordinates of the airport also would be
adjusted in the respective Class D and Class E airspace areas. This
action, initiated by the biennial review of the Salinas airspace area,
would enhance the safety and management of aircraft operations at the
airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 6, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2013-
0708; Airspace Docket No. 13-AWP-11, at the beginning of your comments.
You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking

by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as they may
desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views
and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA 2013-0708 and Airspace Docket No. 13-AWP-11) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2013-0708 and Airspace Docket No. 13-AWP-11''. The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by establishing Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 13.1-mile radius of
Salinas Municipal Airport, Salinas, CA. Additionally, the 10-mile
southeast segment of Class E airspace designated as an extension to
Class D surface area would be modified from the 4.3-mile radius of the
airport to 8 miles southeast of the airport to meet current standards
for IFR departures and arrivals at the airport. This modification
eliminates the need for Class E airspace designated as surface area,
and, therefore, would be removed. Also, the geographic coordinates of
the airport would be updated to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical
database for the respective Class D and Class E airspace areas. This
action, initiated by a biennial review of the airspace, is necessary
for the safety and management of aircraft departing and arriving under
IFR operations at the airport.
    Class D airspace and Class E airspace designations are published in
paragraphs 5000, 6002, 6004 and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order
7400.9X, dated August 7, 2013, and effective September 15, 2013, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR Part 71.1. The Class D airspace
and Class E airspace designation listed in this document will be
published subsequently in this Order.
    The FAA has determined this proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation (1) is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since
this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified this proposed rule, when
promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes
the authority for the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend controlled airspace at Salinas Municipal Airport,
Salinas, CA.
    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR Part 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 7, 2013, and effective September 15,
2013 is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D airspace.

* * * * *

AWP CA D Salinas, CA [Modified]

Salinas Municipal Airport, CA
    (Lat. 36[deg]39'46'' N., long. 121[deg]36'23'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to but not
including 2,500 feet MSL within a 4.3-mile radius of the Salinas
Municipal Airport. This Class D airspace area is effective during
the specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to

Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

Paragraph 6002 Class E airspace Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

AWP CA E2 Salinas, CA [Removed]

Paragraph 6004 Class E airspace areas designated as an extension to
Class D surface area.

* * * * *

AWP CA E4 Salinas, CA [Modified]

Salinas Municipal Airport, CA
    (Lat. 36[deg]39'46'' N., long. 121[deg]36'23'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 1.8 miles
each side of the 150[deg] bearing of Salinas Municipal Airport
extending from the 4.3-mile radius of the airport to 8 miles
southeast of the airport. This Class E airspace area is effective
during the specific dates and times established in advance by a
Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be
continuously published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

AWP CA E5 Salinas, CA [New]

Salinas Municipal Airport, CA
    (Lat. 36[deg]39'46'' N., long. 121[deg]36'23'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 13.1-mile radius of Salinas Municipal Airport.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on September 26, 2013.
Johanna Forkner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2013-24744 Filed 10-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P