 						             	Served: December 4, 2002

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

NOTICE

Japan Charter Authorizations

(January 1 – December 31, 2003)

Under the terms of a 1998 U.S.-Japan Memorandum of Understanding (1998
MOU), U.S. carriers can operate 800 one-way charter flights (hereinafter
we refer to “one-way charters” simply as “charters”) between the
United States and Japan during the calendar year 2003 (January
1-December 31, 2003), subject to the limitation that no more than 300 of
these flights may serve Tokyo.

By Orders 92-6-32 and 92-9-21, we established new procedures to simplify
the distribution of the annual charters available to U.S. carriers for
operation in the U.S.-Japan market.  Specifically, we replaced our
year-to-year comparative allocation proceedings with streamlined advance
allotment/charter pool procedures.  Under these procedures, a portion of
the available charters are allotted in advance to carriers that have
operated an average of at least 20 charters over the previous two years.
 The balance is maintained in a charter pool for distribution on a
first-come, first-served basis.  We stated that allotments would be
issued in advance of the beginning of the charter year to qualifying
carriers for the upcoming charter year.

Under our streamlined procedures, two carriers—Continental Micronesia
and Polar Air Cargo—are entitled to advance allocations.  Based on the
attached summary of carrier operations in the U.S. Japan market,
consistent with the procedures established in Orders 92-6-32 and
92-9-21, Continental Micronesia would receive an advance allocation of
32 charters, and Polar 38 charters.   The remaining 730 flights are
reserved in a charter pool for distribution on a first-come,
first-served basis.

As discussed in Order 92-9-21, we require carriers issued advance
allotments to notify the U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division (X-44),
Office of International Aviation, by letter no later than 14 days after
the service date of this notice as to what portion of their advance
allotment they intend to operate, together with an estimate of the
number of charters to be used for Tokyo service in calendar year 2003.
They also are required to file monthly reports of the charter flights
operated from their advance allocations.  Carriers operating flights
from the charter pool must also file post flight reports, identifying
the date of the Notice of Consistency under which those flights were
approved.

2

The advance allotments issued by this notice and flights operated from
the charter pool for operations in calendar year 2003 are subject to the
conditions and procedures established in the Appendix.

As a final matter, in order to facilitate maximum usage of the available
charter opportunities, and taking into account recent patterns of use
(where supply has considerably exceeded demand) and the fact that under
the terms of the 1998 MOU the total number of available charters has
increased from 600 to 800, we have decided to increase the number of
charters for which carriers may apply each month from 30 to 50.

By:

						READ C. VAN DE WATER

					          Assistant Secretary for Aviation

						        International Affairs

(SEAL)

Dated: December 4, 2002

Attachment

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

										APPENDIX

										Page 1 of 2

1.	The advance allotments are subject to the following condition:

Where fewer than 40 percent of a carrier’s allocated charters have
been

used or been committed for use by contracts during the six-month

period ending June 30, the remaining charter allotments exceeding or
equal

to the number of those already operated or committed by contract in the

preceding six months would be forfeited and placed in the charter pool.

2.	The charters not subject to advance allotment for the charter year
are reserved in a charter pool for distribution on a first-come,
first-served basis subject to the following conditions:

(a)	For the period January 1 through October, 31, 2003, carriers may
apply

for up to 50 charters per month;

(b)	After October 31, 2003, no restrictions apply on the number of

charters that may be applied for each month;

(c)	Applications to operate charters may be filed no earlier than

90 days in advance of the flight date; and

(d)	Applications must identify the type of charter (passenger or

cargo); the date of each one-way flight; the charterer(s); the city-pair

markets involved by direction; the type of aircraft to be used; and

(for cargo charters) the type of cargo transported.  After October 31,

2003, a copy of the charter contract would also be required.

3.	Each carrier granted an advance allotment must notify the U.S. Air
Carrier Licensing Division (X-44), Office of International Aviation, by
letter, no later than July 10, 2003, of the number of charters it has
operated through June 30, 2003, and the number of flights committed by
firm contracts for the balance of the charter year.  For charters under
contract, carriers shall indicate the charterer(s), dates, city-pair
markets, and nature of the traffic.

4.	Each carrier granted either an advance allotment or pool charters
must notify the U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division (X-44), Office of
International Aviation, no later than the tenth day of each month (or
until its charters are exhausted, whichever occurs earlier) of: (1) the
number of Japan charters operated during the preceding month; (2) the
city pairs served by direction; and (3) the number of charters for which
Japanese authority was obtained for that month which

										APPENDIX

										Page 2 of 2

subsequently were canceled or rescheduled.  Carriers with advance
allotment charters shall notify the Department whether or not any
charters have been operated by the carrier during the month and such
carriers shall return to the Department immediately any allotted
flights(s) that it will not use; and

5.	The Director of the Office of International Aviation is assigned the
authority for this and subsequent charter years, to administer
distribution of flights from the charter pool established by this order
and, where deemed in the public interest, to waive the restrictions on
the charter pool.

U.S.-JAPAN CHARTER OPERATIONS

					2 0 0 0				   2 0 0 1

			Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun		Total

Continental Micronesia	  0             8            0            0
      2           6           12             0            4            4
            8           0                           44

Federal Express	                0             1            4
2             0          2*           0              0            0
      1             8           0                           18

Polar Air Cargo		  1*           3*          10*       15*        11*
    3*          1*            2*          2*          1*           3*
      2*                        53*

					2 0 0 1				   2 0 0 2

			Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun		Total

Continental Micronesia	  0             0            0            0
      0           0             4             0            2
3             8           0                           17

Federal Express	                0             0            0
3              0           0             0             0            1
       2              0          0                             6

Polar Air Cargo		  1*           3*          1*          4*            3*
        0             2             1            2           1
   1          2                           21

*Flights obtained from the charter pool

Two Year Average

											            Rounded to Next

			2000/2001		2001/2002		Average			Even Number

Continental Micronesia	     44			      17			   30.5
                32

Federal Express		     18                                          6
                              12
    12

Polar Air Cargo                       53*
      21                                    37
                  38

 Our procedures provide that the average number will be rounded to the
next even number.  See Order 92-6-32 at page 4.

 Based on Federal Express’ monthly reports filed with the Department,
Federal Express did not operate an average of at least 20 charters over
the previous two years and, thus, does not qualify to receive an advance
allotment for the 2003 charter year.


[Federal Register: February 9, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 25)]
[Notices]
[Page 6401-6402]
[DOCID:fr09fe09-29]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC09-546-000]

Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-546); Comment
Request; Extension

February 2, 2009.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of proposed information collection and request for
comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of section 3506(c)(2)(a)
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. No. 104-13), the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is soliciting public
comment on the specific aspects of the information collection described
below.

DATES: Comments in consideration of the collection of information are
due April 13, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be filed either electronically or in paper
format, and should refer to Docket No. IC09-546-000. Documents must be
prepared in an acceptable filing format and in compliance with
Commission submission guidelines at http://www.ferc.gov/help/
submission-guide.asp.
    Comments may be eFiled. The eFiling option under the Documents &
Filings tab on the Commission's home Web page: http://www.ferc.gov
directs users to the eFiling Web site. First-time users follow the
eRegister instructions on the eFiling Web page to establish a user name
and password before eFiling. Filers will receive an emailed
confirmation of their eFiled comments. Commenters filing electronically
should not make a paper filing. If you are unable to make a filing
electronically, submit an original and 14 paper copies of the filing
to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    Parties interested in receiving automatic notification of activity
in this docket may do so through eSubscription. The eSubscription
option under the Documents & Filings tab on the Commission's home Web
page directs users to the eSubscription Web page. Users submit the
docket numbers of the filings they wish to track and will subsequently
receive an e-mail notification each time a filing is made under the
submitted docket numbers. First-time users will need to establish a
user name and password before eSubscribing.
    Filed comments and FERC issuances may be viewed, printed and
downloaded remotely from the Commission's Web site. The red eLibrary
link found at the top of most of the Commission's Web pages directs
users to the eLibrary. From the eLibrary Web page, choose General
Search, and in the Docket Number space provided, enter IC09-546; then
click the Submit button at the bottom of the page.
    For help with any of the Commission's electronic submission or
retrieval systems, e-mail FERC Online Support:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or telephone toll-free:<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY
(202) 502-8659).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Michael Miller may be reached by telephone at
(202) 502-8415, by fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, and by e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FERC-546 (Certificated Rate Filings: Gas
Pipeline Rates; OMB Control Number 1902-0155) is required to implement
Sections 4, 5, 16 and 7(e) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) (15 U.S.C. 717-
717w). NGA Sections 4, 5 and 16 authorize the Commission to inquire
into rate structures and methodologies and to set rates at a just and
reasonable level. Section 7(e) authorizes the Commission to set initial
rates that are in keeping with the public convenience and necessity.
    The Commission uses the FERC-546 information to examine service and
tariff provisions for the transportation and storage, and/or sale of
natural gas in interstate commerce filed with the Commission.
    When a pipeline decides to construct and operate a jurisdictional
pipeline, it files an application with the Commission and receives a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. As part of its review,
the Commission considers and authorizes ``initial rates'' for
transportation and/or storage service for the pipeline. Initial rates
are established for new services authorized in certificate proceedings
and must meet a public convenience and necessity standard. Initial
rates established in the certificate proceeding remain in effect until
such rates are reviewed by the Commission in a rate proceeding. The
information submitted by the pipeline company to the Commission in
these applications for initial rates is the subject of FERC-546.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Commission collects information necessary to examine and
approve any change in rates separately under FERC-542 and FERC-545.
The FERC-542 is for tracking filings, and FERC-545 is for general
rate change filings, including NGA Section 4 major rate cases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission's reporting requirements for this information
collection are provided in 18 CFR 154.4, 154.7, 154.202, 154.204-.209,
and 154.602-.603. Failure to collect this information would prevent the
Commission from monitoring and properly evaluating pipeline proposals
to add or modify services.
    Action: The Commission is requesting a three-year extension of the
current reporting requirements.
    Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this collection is
estimated at:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Number of          Number of        Average burden
   FERC Data Collection--FERC-546        respondents       responses per        hours per         Total annual
                                           annually          respondent          response         burden hours
                                                    (1)                (2)                (3)    (1) x (2) x (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Natural Gas Companies...............                 77                  4                 40             12,320
Storage Operators...................                  3                  1                350              1,050
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Total...........................  .................  .................  .................             13,370
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The estimated cost burden to respondents is $812,381.76 (13,370
hours divided by 2,080 hours \2\ per year times $126,384 \3\ equals
$812,381.77). The cost per respondent is $10,154.77.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Number of hours an employee works each year.
    \3\ Average annual salary per employee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The reporting burden includes the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide
the information including: (1) Reviewing instructions; (2) developing,
acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for the
purposes of collecting, validating, verifying, processing, maintaining,
disclosing and providing information; (3) adjusting the existing ways
to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
(4) training personnel to respond to the collection of information; (5)
searching data sources; (6) completing and reviewing the collection of
information; and (7) transmitting, or otherwise disclosing the
information.
    The respondent's cost estimate is based upon salaries for
professional and clerical support, as well as direct and indirect
overhead costs. Direct costs include all costs directly attributable to
providing this information, such as administrative costs and the cost
for information technology. Indirect or overhead costs are costs
incurred by an organization in support of its mission. These costs
apply to activities which benefit the whole organization rather than
any one particular function or activity.
    Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to
minimize the respondent information collection burden, including the
use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-2603 Filed 2-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75197-75200]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29492]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73813; File No. SR-BATS-2014-063]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Related to
Fees for Use of BATS Exchange, Inc.

December 11, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on December 1, 2014, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BATS'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one establishing or
changing a member due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange
under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)
thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposed rule change effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to amend the fee schedule applicable
to Members \5\ and non-members of the Exchange pursuant to BATS Rules
15.1(a) and (c). Changes to the fee schedule pursuant to this proposal
are effective upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ A Member is defined as ``any registered broker or dealer
that has been admitted to membership in the Exchange.'' See Exchange
Rule 1.5(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at http://www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to modify its fee schedule effective
immediately in order to adopt pricing for ROOC orders, to adopt pricing
for orders that execute pursuant to Rule 11.24, titled ``Opening
Process for Non-BATS-Listed Securities,'' to adjust the requirements to
achieve Tier 3 of the Cross-Asset Step-Up Tiers, and to amend pricing
for and add two additional tiers to the NBBO Setter program, as
described below.
ROOC
    The Exchange recently filed a rule change to adopt a new routing
strategy, ROOC, which provides that orders entered on the Exchange may
be designated for participation in the opening, re-opening (following a
halt suspension or pause), or closing process (collectively, an
``Auction'') of a primary listing market other than the Exchange if
received before the opening/re-

opening/closing time of such market.\6\ As such, the Exchange proposes
to adopt pricing related to this new routing strategy: The Exchange is
proposing to charge $0.0015 per share for ROOC orders routed and
executed in the listing market's opening or re-opening cross and charge
$0.0010 per share for orders routed and executed in the listing
market's closing process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73418 [sic.]
(October 23, 2014), 79 FR 64431 (October 29, 2014) (SR-BATS-2014-
052).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Opening Process
    The Exchange recently filed and the Commission approved a proposed
rule change to adopt Rule 11.24, establishing an opening and re-opening
process on the Exchange in non-BATS-listed securities (the ``Opening
Process'').\7\ The Opening Process is substantially similar to the
opening processes on EDGA Exchange, Inc. (``EDGA'') and EDGX Exchange,
Inc. (``EDGX''). The Exchange proposes to adopt pricing for the new
Opening Process such that any non-BATS-listed security that is executed
in the Opening Process will be charged $0.0005 per share.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73473 (October 30,
2014), 79 FR 65744 (November 5, 2014) (SR-BATS-2014-037).
    \8\ The Exchange notes that this proposed fee is $0.0005 less
than the fee charged for executions in the opening process on EDGX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cross-Asset Step-Up Tiers
    Currently, a Member receives a $0.0032 rebate per share when they
achieve Tier 3 of the Cross-Asset Step-Up Tier, which requires that the
Member's Step-Up Add TCV \9\ to be equal to or greater than 0.30%
(``Requirement One'') and that the Member's Options Step-Up Add TCV
\10\ is equal to or greater than 0.40% (``Requirement Two''). There is
no minimum that a Member's Step-Up Add TCV must meet in order to
achieve Cross-Asset Step-Up Tiers 1 and 2. The Exchange is proposing to
amend Requirement One in order to change the measurement from a
Member's Step-Up Add TCV to a Member's ADAV \11\ as a percentage of TCV
\12\ and to lower the threshold required to satisfy Requirement One
from 0.30% to 0.20%. This means that a Member would fulfill Requirement
One by achieving where the Member's ADAV as a percentage of TCV is
greater than 0.20%. This proposed change would make Requirement One
significantly easier for Members to meet, not only because the
numerical threshold has been lowered from 0.30% to 0.20%, but also
because the entirety of a Member's monthly ADAV would be included in
the calculation (ADAV/TCV) instead of only including the increase in
the Member's ADAV as a percentage of TCV for the current month as
compared to January 2014, as is currently the case ([ADAV/TCV]-[ADAV in
January 2014/TCV in January 2014]). In coordination with lowering the
threshold for Requirement One, the Exchange is also proposing to
increase the threshold for meeting Requirement Two by requiring a
Member's Options Step-Up Add TCV to be equal to or greater than 0.60%
instead of 0.40%. The Exchange believes that the combination of these
two proposed changes will allow more Members to meet Requirement One,
which will incentivize a greater number of Members to seek to meet
Requirement Two, thereby enhancing liquidity on both the Exchange and
the Exchange's options platform (``BATS Options'') and providing more
Members with the opportunity to receive enhanced rebates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ ``Step-Up Add TCV'' means ADAV as a percentage of TCV in
January 2014 subtracted from current ADAV as a percentage of TCV.
    \10\ ``Options Step-Up Add TCV'' means ADAV as a percentage of
TCV in January 2014 subtracted from current ADAV as a percentage of
TCV, using the definitions of ADAV and TCV as provided under Options
Pricing.
    \11\ ``ADAV'' means average daily added volume calculated as the
number of shares added.
    \12\ ``TCV'' means total consolidated volume calculated as the
volume reported by all exchanges and trade reporting facilities to a
consolidated transaction reporting plan for the month for which the
fees apply, excluding volume on any day that the Exchange
experiences an Exchange System Disruption, on any day with a
scheduled early market close and the Russell Reconstitution Day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

NBBO Setter
    Currently, the Exchange only offers a single NBBO Setter rebate,
which provides that an order that establishes a new NBBO receives an
additional rebate of $0.0002 per share, and a single NBBO Joiner
rebate, which provides that any order that joins the NBBO when BATS is
not already at the NBBO receives an additional rebate of $0.0001 per
share. The Exchange is proposing to add two additional tiers at which
Members may receive additional rebates for setting the NBBO and to
amend the rebate per share associated with both the current NBBO Setter
rebate and the NBBO Joiner rebate. In conjunction with the addition of
these two new tiers, the Exchange is proposing to add additional
language to footnote one on the fee schedule in order to establish the
definition of Setter Add TCV as meaning the average daily added volume
calculated as the number of displayed shares added that establish a new
NBBO as a percentage of TCV.
    First, the Exchange is proposing to add an NBBO Setter Tier 2 and
NBBO Setter Tier 3, as well as changing the existing NBBO Setter rebate
to NBBO Setter Tier 1. The Exchange is proposing that NBBO Setter Tier
2 shall state that any order that establishes a new NBBO and the
Member's Setter Add TCV is equal to or greater than 0.05% shall receive
an additional rebate of $0.0002 per share. The Exchange is also
proposing that NBBO Setter Tier 3 shall state that any order
establishing a new NBBO where such Member's Setter Add TCV is equal to
or greater than 0.10% shall receive an additional rebate of $0.0004 per
share. Finally, the Exchange is proposing to change the rebate for NBBO
Setter Tier 1 to $0.0001 per share and the NBBO Joiner rebate to
$0.00005 per share.
    The Exchange proposes to implement the amendments to its fee
schedule effective immediately.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and,
in particular, with the requirements of Section 6 of the Act.\13\
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Sections 6(b)(4) of the Act and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\14\
in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among members and other persons using any
facility or system which the Exchange operates or controls. The
Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily direct order flow to competing venues
if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed changes to the Exchange's
fee schedule to add fees for the ROOC routing strategy when routed and
executed in the listing market's Auction represent a reasonable and
equitable allocation of fees because they are equal to or roughly
equivalent to the fees that will be charged pursuant to the applicable
exchange's fee schedule for participation in an Auction. The Exchange
further believes that the proposed fees for ROOC are non-discriminatory
because they apply uniformly to all Members and, again, because they
approximate the fees at the away venue.

    The Exchange also believes that its proposed pricing for the
Opening Process is reasonable and equitable because the Opening Process
is generally analogous to the opening and halt auctions in BATS-listed
securities (the ``Opening Auctions'') in that they both allow orders to
queue for participation at the market open or to roll over into the
continuous book and the proposed fees are equal to the standard fees
applicable to orders that participate in the Opening Auctions. Further,
the fee per share for participation in the Opening Process is $0.0005
less than the fee charged for executions in the opening process on
EDGX. The Exchange also believes that the proposed fees for the Opening
Process are non-discriminatory because they apply uniformly to all
Members and, again, because they are equal to or less the fees charged
at other venues for analogous executions.
    The Exchange also believes that its proposed additional tiers and
associated rebates to the NBBO Setter are reasonable and equitable
because the tiers based on Setter Add TCV is intended to reward those
Members that [sic.] and incentivize other Members to add a larger
amount of volume that sets the NBBO on the Exchange by providing
additional rebates of $0.0002 and $0.0004 per share for Members that
have a Setter Add TCV of 0.05% and 0.10%, respectively. Further, the
Exchange believes that the new NBBO Setter tiers are reasonable and
equitable because they incentivize and reward Members for posting
liquidity that sets the NBBO on the Exchange, which is consistent with
the overall goals of enhancing market quality on the Exchange. The
Exchange also believes that the proposed rebates associated with these
tiers are non-discriminatory in that they are equally available to all
Members and, again, because they are consistent with the goal of
enhancing market quality on the Exchange.
    Similarly, the Exchange believes that the reductions to the NBBO
Setter Tier 1 and NBBO Joiner rebates are reasonable and equitable
because, while they mark reductions to the standard additional rebates,
Members have the opportunity to receive equal or greater rebates
through the addition of NBBO Setter Tier 2, which allows Members to
receive the old NBBO Setter Tier 1 rebate ($0.0002) if they achieve a
modest Setter Add TCV (0.05%), and the addition of NBBO Setter Tier 3,
which allows Members to potentially receive $0.0004 per share where the
Member achieves NBBO Setter Tier 3 (0.10% Setter Add TCV). Further,
because the Exchange is lowering the NBBO Setter Tier 1 rebate to
$0.0001 per share, it follows that the NBBO Joiner rebate should be
reduced to an amount less than $0.0001 because NBBO Joiner liquidity is
providing less value to the broader market and the Exchange by only
joining the already established NBBO than an order that sets the NBBO
for the entire market. The Exchange believes that such proposed fee
changes for NBBO Setter Tier 1 and NBBO Joiner are non-discriminatory
because they will apply uniformly to all Members and all Members will
still have the opportunity to achieve the higher rebates by achieving
the requirements to meet NBBO Setter Tiers 2 and 3.
    Finally, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes to the
Cross-Asset Step-Up Tier 3 are reasonable and equitable because the
threshold for achieving Requirement One is being significantly reduced
by: (i) Adjusting the calculation to include only ADAV as a percentage
of TCV from the current month instead of ADAV as a percentage of TCV
from the current month minus ADAV as a percentage of TCV in January of
2014; and (ii) by reducing the required percentage from 0.30% to 0.20%,
both of which combined will make it easier for Members to satisfy
Requirement One. While the proposed changes in Requirement Two to the
Options Step-Up TCV threshold will mark an increase in the Options
Step-Up TCV necessary to satisfy Requirement Two, the Exchange believes
that this proposal is reasonable and equitable when evaluated in
conjunction with the relaxation of Requirement One. Specifically, the
Exchange believes that the relaxation of Requirement One will generally
make Tier 3 more attainable to more Members and will incentivize
Members that otherwise would not have been eligible for Tier 3 to add
more liquidity to both the Exchange and BATS Options, thereby improving
market quality on both markets. The Exchange believes that these
proposed amendments to Cross-Asset Step-Up Tier 3 are non-
discriminatory in that they apply uniformly to all Members.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. To
the contrary, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes will
allow the Exchange to compete more ably with other execution venues by
providing additional competitive services (ROOC, Opening Process) at
competitive prices as well as to amend its fee schedule to increase the
market quality in securities traded on the Exchange, thereby making it
a more desirable destination venue for its customers. Also, because the
market for order execution is extremely competitive, Members may
readily opt to disfavor the Exchange's routing services if they believe
that alternatives offer them better value. For orders routed through
ROOC, the proposed fees approximate the cost to the Exchange of
executing the orders on away trading venues. As stated above, the
Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily direct order flow to competing venues
if the deem fee structures to be unreasonable or excessive.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any written comments from members or other interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \15\ and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\16\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If
the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute
proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved
or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or

     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BATS-2014-063 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2014-063. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2014-063 and should be
submitted on or before January 7, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29492 Filed 12-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57001-57002]
[FR Doc No: 2022-20019]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-815, OMB Control No. 3235-0769]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Rule 139b

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') has, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (``PRA''), has
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a request for
extension of the previously approved collection of information, ``Rule
139b Disclosure of Standardized Performance,'' in connection with the
Rule 139b (17 CFR 230.139b) under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C.
77a et seq.) (``Securities Act'') that was adopted by the Commission on
November 30, 2018, as discussed below.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Release No. 33-10580 (Nov. 30, 2018) [83 FR 64180 (Dec.
13, 2018)] (``Adopting Release''). Rule 139b became effective on
January 14, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As directed by the Fair Access to Investment Research Act of 2017
(Pub. L. 115-66, 131 Stat. 1196 (2017) (the ``FAIR Act''), the
Commission adopted rule 139b under the Securities Act to extend the
safe harbor under rule 139 to a ``covered investment fund research
report.'' Specifically, rule 139b provides a safe harbor to a broker-
dealer who publishes or distributes, in the regular course of its
business, research reports concerning one or more ``covered investment
fund(s)'' while participating in the distribution of a covered
investment fund's securities.
    In the Adopting Release, the Commission adopted the provision that
rule 139b include a standardized performance requirement. The
Commission believes that standardized performance presentation is an
appropriate requirement because investors tend to consider fund
performance a significant factor in evaluating or comparing investment
companies, and the requirement addresses potential investor confusion
if a communication were not easily recognizable as research as opposed
to an advertising prospectus or supplemental sales literature. Rule
139b requires that research reports about open-end funds that include
performance information must present it in accordance with paragraphs
(d), (e), and (g) of rule 482. Rule 139b also requires that research
reports about closed-end funds that include performance information
must present it in accordance with instructions to item 4.1(g) of Form
N-2. Performance measures calculated by broker-dealers are not required
to be kept confidential and there is no mandatory retention period. The
Commission anticipates that compliance with these performance measures
for each fund discussed in a research report, and for which the
performance measures apply, would increase compliance costs for broker-
dealers seeking to publish or distribute a covered investment fund
research report.
    It is difficult to provide estimates of the burdens and costs for
those broker-dealers that will include performance information in a
rule 139b research report. As discussed in the Adopting Release, this
is difficult to estimate because current data collected does not
reflect the affiliate exclusion, does not include the entire universe
of covered investment funds, and it is uncertain what percentage of
communications currently filed as rule 482 advertising prospectuses (or
rule 34b-1 supplemental sales materials) will instead be published in
reliance of rule 139b, as covered investment fund research reports.\2\
For purposes of the PRA, we estimate that 10% of the rule 482 and rule
34b-1 communications currently filed by broker-dealers with FINRA
(approximately 48,341) could be considered as rule 139b covered
investment fund research reports. We estimate that broker-dealers will
publish annually 4,834 (10% of 48,341) covered investment fund research
reports. Moreover, we assume for purposes of the PRA that all estimated
rule 139b research reports will include fund performance information.
We further estimate that 1,169 broker-dealers would likely be
respondents to the collection of information with a frequency of 4.1
responses per year.\3\ Additionally, we estimate that each research
report will require 3 hours of ongoing internal burden hours by a
broker-dealers' personnel to comply with the rule 139b collection of
information requirements, which for each broker-dealer is estimated to
be 12.3 internal burden hours.\4\ In sum, we estimate that rule 139b's
requirements will impose a total annual internal hour burden of 14,379
hours on broker-dealers.\5\ We do not think there is an external cost
burden associated with this collection of information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Adopting Release, supra note 1, n. 413 and accompanying
paragraph.
    \3\ Based on information provided by FINRA, for the period
January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, there were an aggregate
of 48,341 filings that were coded as either Rule 482 or Rule 34b-1
filings. Furthermore, the Commission estimates that for the period
January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, there were 4,834 covered
investment fund research reports/1,169 broker-dealers = 4.1 annual
responses per broker-dealer.
    \4\ 4.1 annual responses per broker-dealer x 3 internal burden
hours = 12.3 annual internal burden hours per broker-dealer.
    \5\ 12.3 annual burden hours * 1,169 broker-dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This collection of information requirement would not be mandatory
for broker-dealers seeking to rely upon rule 139b, but would be
necessary for those broker-dealers that would like to provide
performance information in their covered investment fund research
reports. Responses to the information collections will not be kept
confidential. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice
by October 17, 2022 to (i) [email protected]
and (ii) David Bottom, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities
and Exchange Commission, c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an email to: [email protected].

    Dated: September 12, 2022.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-20019 Filed 9-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


	UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI  48105-2498

December 1, 2015

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:	Trailer Importation Discussion with Wabash National Corporation
on November 24, 2015

FROM:	Jessica Brakora, Engineer, Assessment and Standards Division

Office of Transportation and Air Quality

TO:	Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for
Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles - Phase 2 - Dockets
NHTSA-2014-0132 and EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0827

EPA held a short conference call with Wabash National Corporation
(Wabash) to discuss Wabash’s compliance concerns related to imported
trailers.  The purpose of the meeting was to introduce EPA’s
Compliance Division to the public comments submitted by Wabash following
publication of the Phase 2 NPRM.  The intent was to arrange a future
meeting and include appropriate additional EPA staff as needed.  The
following participants attended the conference call:

Wabash representatives:

Patrick Quinn, The Accord Group

Jamie Scarcelli, Wabash, Senior Vice President - General Counsel and
Secretary

Erin Roth, Wabash, Vice President - Corporate Strategy and Government
Affairs

EPA representatives:

Byron Bunker, EPA Compliance Division

Stephen Healy, EPA Compliance Division

Jessica Brakora, EPA Assessment and Standards Division

Wabash was concerned that trailers manufactured in either Canada or
Mexico could potentially be imported into the U.S. without meeting the
future Phase 2 regulations.  Wabash stated that it was concerned that
customers (or third-party carriers hired by the customer) would simply
drive over the border, pick up a foreign-made trailer, and drive back
into the U.S. with the new, non-compliant trailer.  Since trailers are
generally delivered individually (i.e., there are no trailers designed
to carry multiple trailers equivalent to automobile haulers), new
trailers may be overlooked by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
as simply tractor-trailers making a cross-border delivery.

EPA stated that as of today, CBP has access to EPA’s database and
regularly inspects imported vehicle and engine products to make sure
emissions certification labels are available.  It is easy to identify
these “products” when they are shipped in boxes or in/on trailers,
but EPA acknowledged that it may be difficult to recognize a trailer as
a product if it’s driven across in it a tractor-trailer vehicle
configuration.  However, EPA noted that such a vehicle would need to get
a license plate, which would require some level of registration and that
registration could be tied to a record of certification on the
vehicle’s title.

Wabash noted that trailers do not have “titles”; instead they have a
“manufacturer’s statement of origin” (MSO).  MSOs are used to
register the trailers and they stated that these documents will identify
the manufacturer, but do not always include the specific site in which a
trailer was manufactured.

EPA stated that trailer-specific customs enforcement procedures are not
in place at this time, but that it will be important to coordinate with
the state-level Departments of Motor Vehicles to ensure MSOs are
appropriate.  Additionally, EPA will have to ensure that labels are
placed such that customs can easily identify trailers that are
certified.  Wabash offered to bring some example MSO documents to a
future meeting.

Trailer Importation Discussion with Wabash on November 24, 2015 - Page
PAGE  2  of   NUMPAGES   2


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 20, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43124-43128]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18284]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0565]
RIN 1625-AA00; 1625-AA08

Safety Zones; July Fireworks Displays and Swim Events in the
Captain of the Port New York Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing nine temporary safety zones
for marine events within the Coast Guard Captain of the Port (COTP) New
York Zone for fireworks displays and swim events. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during
the events. Entry into, transit through, mooring or anchoring within
these zones is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP New York.

DATES: This rule is effective from July 20, 2011 until July 30, 2011.
These regulations have been enforced with actual notice since July 1,
2011.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0565 and are available online
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0565 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail LT Eunice James, Coast Guard Sector New
York Waterways Management Division;<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because any delay encountered in this
regulation's effective date by publishing a NPRM would be contrary to
public interest, since immediate action is needed to provide for the
safety of life and property on navigable waters from the hazards
associated with fireworks including unexpected detonation and burning
debris; also immediate action is needed to provide for the safety of
life and property on navigable waters from the hazards associated with
swimmers in the water in or near navigable channels. We spoke with each
event sponsor and each indicated they were unable and unwilling to move
their event date to a later time. Sponsors for the Fort Hamilton
Independence Day Celebration Fireworks Display; Rumson, NJ Fireworks
Display; the City of Poughkeepsie Fireworks Display; Larchmont Yacht
Club Fireworks Display; City of New Rochelle Fireworks Display; and
Keyport Firemen's Fair Fireworks Display stated they are unwilling to
reschedule these events because they are being held in conjunction with
various Independence Day celebrations. Many community members have made
holiday plans based on these fireworks events and changing the date
would cause numerous cancelations and hurt small businesses.
Rescheduling would not be a viable option because most event venues,
entertainers, and venders have fully booked summer schedules making
rescheduling nearly impossible. Sponsors for the Brooklyn Bridge Swim,
Swim Across America, and Hudson Valley Triathlon stated they are
unwilling to reschedule these events because the dates of each swim
event were chosen based on optimal tide, current, and weather
conditions needed to promote the safety of swim participants. In
addition, any change to the dates of the events would cause economic
hardship on the marine event sponsors, negatively impacting other
activities being held in conjunction with these events and creating
unsafe event conditions.
    Additionally, due to the dangers posed by the pyrotechnics used in
fireworks displays and the hazards associated with swim events, the
safety zones are necessary to provide for the safety of event
participants, spectator crafts, and other vessels operating near the
event areas. For the safety concerns noted, it is in the public
interest to have this regulation in effect during these events.
    These fireworks displays and swim events are all reoccurring marine
events with a proposed permanent rule currently in a public comment
period under docket number USCG-2010-1001 titled, Special Local
Regulations and Safety Zones; Recurring Events in Captain of the Port
New York Sound Zone. Additionally, the Coast Guard has ordered safety
zones or special local regulations for all of these areas for past
events and has not received public

comments or concerns regarding establishment of waterways restrictions.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. The rule must become effective on
the dates specified in Table 1 and 2 in order to provide for the safety
of the public including spectators and vessels operating in the area
near these events. Delaying the effective date of this rule until after
30 days have elapsed after publication is impractical and would expose
spectators, vessels, and other property to the hazards associated with
these marine events.

Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for the temporary rule is 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231, 46
U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; Pub. L. 107-295,
116 Stat. 2064; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1, which collectively authorize the Coast Guard to define safety
zones.
    These fireworks displays and swim events are being held during the
month of July on the navigable waters within the COTP New York Zone. In
the past, the Coast Guard has established special local regulations,
regulated areas, and safety zones for these events on a case by case
basis to ensure the protection of the maritime public and event
participants from the hazards associated with these events. The Coast
Guard has not received public comments or concerns regarding the impact
to waterway traffic from these events.
    This temporary final rule will apprise the public in a timely
manner through publication in the Federal Register.
    These events pose significant risk to participants, spectators and
the maritime public because of hazardous conditions associated with
fireworks displays and swim events. These temporary safety zones are
necessary to ensure the safety of participants, spectators and vessels.

Discussion of Rule

    This rule establishes temporary safety zones on the waters of the
COTP New York zone. These temporary safety zones will encompass various
locations, listed in Table 1 and Table 2 below.
    All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
COTP New York or the designated on-scene representative. Entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within the temporary safety zones are
prohibited unless authorized by the COTP New York, or the designated
representative. The COTP New York or the designated representative may
be reached on VFH Channel 16.
    Because large numbers of spectator vessels are expected to
congregate around the location of these events, the regulated areas are
needed to protect both spectators and participants from the safety
hazards created by fireworks displays and swimmers in the water. During
the enforcement period of the regulated areas, persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting through, remaining, anchoring or
mooring within the zone unless specifically authorized by the COTP or
the designated representatives. The Coast Guard may be assisted by
other federal, state and local agencies in the enforcement of these
regulated areas.
    The Coast Guard determined that these regulated areas will not have
a significant impact on vessel traffic due to their temporary nature
and limited size and the fact that vessels are allowed to transit the
navigable waters outside of the regulated areas. Additionally, the
Coast Guard has ordered safety zones for all of these nine areas for
past events and has not received public comments or concerns regarding
the impact to waterway traffic from events.
    Advanced public notifications will also be made to the local
maritime community by the Local Notice to Mariners as well as Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
    The Coast Guard's implementation of these temporary special local
regulations and safety zones will be of short duration and designed to
minimize the impact to vessel traffic on the navigable waters. These
safety zones will only be enforced for a short duration. Furthermore,
vessels may be authorized to transit the zones with permission of the
COTP New York or the designated on-scene representative.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of the navigable waterway in the
vicinity of these marine events during the effective period.
    This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: Vessel
traffic can safely transit around the zone. Before the effective
period, we will issue maritime advisories widely available to users of
the waterway. This rule will be in effect for a short duration at
various times from July 02, 2011 until July 30, 2011.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of
temporary safety zones. An environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T01-0565 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T01-0565  Safety Zones; July Fireworks Displays and Swim
Events in the Captain of the Port New York Zone.

    (a) Regulations. The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23
as well as the following regulations apply to the fireworks displays
and swim events listed in Table 1 and Table 2 of Sec.  165.T01-0565.
These regulations will be enforced for the duration of each event.
Notifications of exact dates and times of the enforcement period will
be made to the local maritime community through the Local Notice to
Mariners, and Broadcast Notice to Mariners. First Coast Guard District
Local Notice to Mariners can be found at http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/.
    (b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
    (1) Designated Representative. A ``designated representative'' is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard who has been designated by the COTP, Sector New York to act
on his or her behalf. The designated representative may be on an
official patrol vessel or may be on shore and will communicate with
vessels via VHF-FM radio or loudhailer. In addition, members of the
Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to inform vessel operators of this
regulation.
    (2) Official Patrol Vessels. Official patrol vessels may consist of
any Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or local law enforcement
vessels assigned or approved by the COTP.
    (3) Spectators. All persons and vessels not registered with the
event sponsor as participants or official patrol vessels.
    (c) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the
regulated areas shall contact the COTP or the designated representative
via VHF channel 16 or<PHONE_NUMBER> (Sector New York command center) to
obtain permission to do so.
    (d) Spectators or other vessels shall not anchor, block, loiter, or
impede the transit of event participants or official patrol vessels in
the regulated areas during the effective dates and times, or

dates and times as modified through the Local Notice to Mariners,
unless authorized by COTP or designated on-scene representative.
    (e) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel or the
designated representative, by siren, radio, flashing light or other
means, the operator of the vessel shall proceed as directed. Failure to
comply with a lawful direction may result in expulsion from the area,
citation for failure to comply, or both.
    (f) The COTP or the designated representative may delay or
terminate any marine event in this subpart at any time it is deemed
necessary to ensure the safety of life or property.
    (g) The regulated area for all fireworks displays listed in Table 1
is that area of navigable waters within a 360 yard radius of the launch
platform or launch site for each fireworks display, unless otherwise
noted in Table 1 or modified in USCG First District Local Notice to
Mariners at: http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/.
    (h) Fireworks barges used in these locations will also have a sign
on their port and starboard side labeled ``FIREWORKS--STAY AWAY''. This
sign will consist of 10 inch high by 1.5 inch wide red lettering on a
white background. Shore sites used in these locations will display a
sign labeled ``FIREWORKS--STAY AWAY'' with the same dimensions.

                     Table 1 of Sec.   165.T01-0565
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.0                                              New York Harbor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.1 Fort Hamilton Independence Day        Date: July 2, 2011.
 Celebration Fireworks Display.           Rain Date: July 3,
                                          2011.
                                          Time: 9:15 p.m. to
                                          10:15 p.m.
                                          Launch site: A barge
                                          located in approximate
                                          position 40[deg]36'02.5'' N,
                                          074[deg]01'36.6'' W (NAD
                                          1983), approximately 1400
                                          yards southeast of the
                                          Verrazano-Narrows Bridge. This
                                          Safety Zone is a 240-yard
                                          radius from the barge.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.0                                               Navesink River
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.1 Rumson, NJ, Fireworks Display......   Date: July 3, 2011.
                                          Rain Date: July 4,
                                          2011.
                                          Time: 8:45 p.m. to
                                          10:15 p.m.
                                          Launch site: A barge
                                          located in approximate
                                          position 40[deg]22'42'' N
                                          074[deg]01'07'' W (NAD 1983),
                                          approximately 550 yards south
                                          of the Oceanic Bridge. This
                                          Safety Zone is a 300-yard
                                          radius from the barge.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.0                                                Hudson River
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.1 City of Poughkeepsie, Fireworks       Date: July 4, 2011.
 Display.                                 Rain Date: July 5,
                                          2011.
                                          Time: 9 p.m. to 10:30
                                          p.m.
                                          Launch site: A barge
                                          located in approximate
                                          position 41[deg]42'24.50'' N
                                          073[deg]56'44.16'' W (NAD
                                          1983), approximately 420 yards
                                          north of the Mid Hudson
                                          Bridge. This Safety Zone is a
                                          300-yard radius from the
                                          barge.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.0                                         Western Long Island Sound
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.1 Larchmont Yacht Club Fireworks        Date: July 4, 2011.
 Display.                                 Rain Date: July 5,
                                          2011.
                                          Time: 9 p.m. to 10:20
                                          p.m.
                                          Launch site: A barge
                                          located in approximate
                                          position 40[deg]55'17.3'' N,
                                          073[deg]44'13.8'' W (NAD
                                          1983), approximately 620 yards
                                          northwest of Umbrella Point.
                                          This Safety Zone is a 240-yard
                                          radius from the barge.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.2 City of Rochelle, NY, Echo Bay        Date: July 4, 2011.
 Harbor Fireworks Display.                Rain Date: July 5,
                                          2011.
                                          Time: 9 p.m. to 10:20
                                          p.m.
                                          Launch site: A shore
                                          launch located in approximate
                                          position 40[deg]54'34.4'' N,
                                          073[deg]45'56.6'' W (NAD
                                          1983). This Safety Zone is a
                                          180-yard radius from the
                                          launch site.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.0                                                Raritan Bay
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.1 Keyport Firemen's Fair Fireworks      Date: July 23, 2011.
 Display                                  Rain Date: July 24,
                                          2011.
                                          Time: 10:30 p.m. to 12
                                          a.m.
                                          Launch site: A barge
                                          located in approximate
                                          position 40[deg]26'24'' N.
                                          074[deg]12'18'' W (NAD 1983),
                                          approximately 200 yards north
                                          of Keyport, NJ shoreline. This
                                          Safety Zone is a 150-yard
                                          radius from the barge.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                     Table 2 to Sec.   165.T01-0565
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.0                                                 East River
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.1 Brooklyn Bridge Swim...............   Event Type: Swim
                                          Event.
                                          Date: July 30, 2011.
                                          Rain Date: July 31,
                                          2011.
                                          Time: 9 a.m. to 12
                                          p.m.
                                          Location: Participants
                                          will swim between Brooklyn and
                                          Manhattan, New York crossing
                                          the East River along the
                                          Brooklyn Bridge.
                                          Rain Date: July 31,
                                          2011.
                                          Time: 10:05 a.m. to
                                          11:55 a.m.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.0                                         Western Long Island Sound
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.1 Swim Across America................   Event Type: Swim
                                          Event.
                                          Date: July 30, 2011.
                                          Rain Date: NA.
                                          Time: 5:30 a.m. to
                                          10:30 a.m.
                                          Location: Participants
                                          will swim between Glen Cove
                                          and Larchmont, New York and an
                                          area of Hempstead Harbor
                                          between Glen Cove and the
                                          vicinity of Umbrella Point.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.0                                                Hudson River
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.1 Hudson Valley Triathlon............   Event Type: Swim
                                          Event.
                                          Date: July 24, 2011.
                                          Rain Date: NA.
                                          Time: 5 a.m to 11 a.m.
                                          The following area is
                                          a safety zone: All waters of
                                          the Hudson River in the
                                          vicinity of Ulster Landing,
                                          Bound by the following points:
                                          42[deg]00'03.7'' N,
                                          073[deg]56'43.1'' W; thence to
                                          41[deg]59'52.5'' N,
                                          073[deg]56'34.2'' W; thence to
                                          42[deg]00'15.1'' N,
                                          073[deg]56'25.2'' W
                                          thence to
                                          42[deg]00'05.4'' N,
                                          073[deg]56'41.9'' W; thence
                                          along the shoreline to the
                                          point of beginning.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: July 1, 2011.
L.L. Fagan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2011-18284 Filed 7-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: March 31, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 61)]
[Notices]
[Page 16098-16099]
[DOCID:fr31mr10-63]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ Docket No. ER10-881-000]

Reliable Power LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

March 24, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Reliable Power, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is April 13, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access

who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-7137 Filed 3-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 97 (Monday, May 20, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22884-22886]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10393]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2019-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1925]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS
report, once effective, will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before August 19, 2019.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location https://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata and the
respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-1925, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and are used to calculate the appropriate
flood insurance premium rates for new buildings built after the FIRM
and FIS report become effective.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location
https://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata and the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities
with multiple

ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be identified by the
unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date listed in the tables.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Johnson County, Indiana and Incorporated Areas
         Project: 17-05-0798S Preliminary Date: January 8, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Greenwood......................  City of Greenwood City Center,
                                          Planning Department, 300 South
                                          Madison Avenue, Greenwood, IN
                                          46142.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Harrison County, Iowa and Incorporated Areas
         Project: 17-07-0407S Preliminary Date: January 11, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Dunlap.........................  City Hall, 716 Iowa Avenue,
                                          Dunlap, IA 51529.
City of Little Sioux...................  Harrison County Engineer's
                                          Building, 301 North 6th
                                          Avenue, Logan, IA 51546.
City of Logan..........................  City Hall, 108 West 4th Street,
                                          Logan, IA 51546.
City of Missouri Valley................  City Hall, 223 East Erie
                                          Street, Missouri Valley, IA
                                          51555.
City of Modale.........................  City Hall, 310 East Palmer
                                          Street, Modale, IA 51556.
City of Mondamin.......................  City Hall, 120 South Main
                                          Street, Mondamin, IA 51557.
City of Persia.........................  City Hall, 117 Main Street,
                                          Persia, IA 51563.
City of Pisgah.........................  Harrison County Engineer's
                                          Building, 301 North 6th
                                          Avenue, Logan, IA 51546.
City of Woodbine.......................  City Hall, 517 Walker Street,
                                          Woodbine, IA 51579.
Unincorporated Areas of Harrison County  Harrison County Engineer's
                                          Building, 301 North 6th
                                          Avenue, Logan, IA 51546.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Scott County, Iowa and Incorporated Areas
         Project: 17-07-0052S Preliminary Date: October 5, 2018
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Bettendorf.....................  City Hall, 1609 State Street,
                                          Bettendorf, IA 52722.
City of Blue Grass.....................  City Hall, 114 North
                                          Mississippi Street, Blue
                                          Grass, IA 52726.
City of Buffalo........................  City Hall, 329 Dodge Street,
                                          Buffalo, IA 52728.
City of Davenport......................  City Hall, 226 West 4th Street,
                                          Davenport, IA 52801.
City of Dixon..........................  City Hall, 610 Davenport
                                          Street, Dixon, IA 52745.
City of Donahue........................  City Hall, 106 1st Avenue,
                                          Donahue, IA 52746.
City of Eldridge.......................  City Hall, 305 North 3rd
                                          Street, Eldridge, IA 52748.
City of Le Claire......................  City Hall, 325 Wisconsin
                                          Street, Le Claire, IA 52753.
City of Long Grove.....................  City Hall, 104 South 1st
                                          Street, Long Grove, IA 52756.
City of McCausland.....................  City Hall, 305 North Salina
                                          Street, McCausland, IA 52758.
City of Panorama Park..................  City Hall, 120 Short Street,
                                          Panorama Park, IA 52722.
City of Princeton......................  City Hall, 311 3rd Street,
                                          Princeton, IA 52768.
City of Riverdale......................  City Hall, 110 Manor Drive,
                                          Riverdale, IA 52722.
City of Walcott........................  City Hall, 128 West Lincoln
                                          Street, Walcott, IA 52773.
Unincorporated Areas of Scott County...  Scott County Courthouse, 600
                                          West 4th Street, Davenport, IA
                                          52801.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Reno County, Kansas and Incorporated Areas
          Project: 10-07-0016S Preliminary Date: March 1, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Hutchinson.....................  City Hall, 125 East Avenue B,
                                          Hutchinson, KS 67501.
City of Nickerson......................  City Hall, 15 North Nickerson
                                          Street, Nickerson, KS 67561.
City of South Hutchinson...............  City Hall, 2 South Main Street,
                                          South Hutchinson, KS 67505.
City of Willowbrook....................  Reno County Courthouse, 206
                                          West 1st Avenue, Hutchinson,
                                          KS 67501.
Unincorporated Areas of Reno County....  Reno County Courthouse, 206
                                          West 1st Avenue, Hutchinson,
                                          KS 67501.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Marshall County, Minnesota and Incorporated Areas
        Project: 15-05-0583S Preliminary Date: February 28, 2018
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Alvarado.......................  City Hall, 155 Marshall Street,
                                          Alvarado, MN 56710.
City of Argyle.........................  City Hall, 701 Pacific Avenue,
                                          Argyle, MN 56713.
City of Oslo...........................  City Hall, 107 Third Avenue
                                          East, Oslo, MN 56744.
Unincorporated Areas of Marshall County  Marshall County Courthouse, 208
                                          East Colvin Avenue, Warren, MN
                                          56762.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Wilkin County, Minnesota and Incorporated Areas
        Project: 18-05-0006S Preliminary Date: December 28, 2018
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Breckenridge...................  City Hall, 420 Nebraska Avenue,
                                          Breckenridge, MN 56520.

City of Doran..........................  City Hall, 1106 Fourth Street,
                                          Doran, MN 56522.
Unincorporated Areas of Wilkin County..  Wilkin County Courthouse, 300
                                          Fifth Street South,
                                          Breckenridge, MN 56520.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Richland County, North Dakota and Incorporated Areas
        Project: 18-05-0006S Preliminary Date: December 28, 2018
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Wahpeton.......................  City Hall, 1900 Fourth Street
                                          North, Wahpeton, ND 58075.
Township of Center.....................  Board of Center Township, 17915
                                          84th Street Southeast,
                                          Wahpeton, ND 58075.
Township of Dwight.....................  Board of Dwight Township, 17660
                                          County Road 10, Wahpeton, ND
                                          58075.
Township of Fairmount..................  Board of Fairmount Township,
                                          9480 Highway 127, Fairmount,
                                          ND 58030.
Township of Summit.....................  Board of Summit Township, 8945
                                          179th Avenue Southeast,
                                          Fairmount, ND 58030.
Unincorporated Areas of Richland County  Richland County Courthouse, 418
                                          Second Avenue North, Wahpeton,
                                          ND 58075.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2019-10393 Filed 5-17-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P