[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5258-5259]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02333]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9973-54-Region 3]

Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petition To Object to
Title V Permit for Raven Power, Fort Smallwood Complex; Maryland

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed an Order, dated January
17, 2018, denying a petition to object to a title V operating permit,
issued by the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), for the
Raven Power Fort Smallwood Complex in Anne Arundel County, Maryland.
The Order responds to a February 3, 2017 petition. The petition was
submitted jointly by the Chesapeake Climate Action Network,
Environmental Integrity Project, Physicians for Social Responsibility,
Chesapeake, Inc., and the Sierra Club (collectively, the Petitioners).
This Order constitutes final action on that petition requesting that
the Administrator object to the issuance of the proposed CAA title V
permit.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the final Order, the petition, and all pertinent
information relating thereto are on file at the following location:
EPA, Region III, Air Protection Division (APD), 1650 Arch St.,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. EPA requests that if at all

possible, you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view copies of the final Order,
petition, and other supporting information. You may view the hard
copies Monday through Friday, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays. If you wish to examine these documents, you should make an
appointment at least 24 hours before the visiting day. The final Order
is also available electronically at the following website: https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/title-v-petition-database.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Talley, APD, EPA Region III,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CAA affords EPA a 45-day period to
review and object to, as appropriate, operating permits proposed by
state permitting authorities. Section 505(b)(2) of the CAA authorizes
any person to petition the EPA Administrator within 60 days after the
expiration of this review period to object to a state operating permit
if EPA has not done so. Petitions must be based only on objections
raised with reasonable specificity during the public comment period,
unless the petitioner demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise
these issues during the comment period or that the grounds for
objection or other issue arose after the comment period.
    The February 3, 2017 petition requested that the Administrator
object to the proposed title V operating permit issued by MDE (Permit
no. 24-003-0468) on the grounds that the proposed permit and permit
record did not contain adequate monitoring and testing requirements to
demonstrate compliance with the opacity and particulate matter emission
limits contained in the permit.
    The Order denying the petition to object to the state operating
permit to the Raven Power Fort Smallwood Complex explains the reasons
behind EPA's decision to deny the petition for objection.

    Dated: January 23, 2018.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2018-02333 Filed 2-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 29 (Thursday, February 12, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7797-7801]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02964]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2014-1063]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulation; San Diego Crew Classic; Mission Bay,
San Diego, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary interim rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is temporarily changing the date of the
special local regulation on the navigable waters of Mission Bay, San
Diego, California in support of the annual San Diego Crew Classic
rowing race. This temporary interim rule adjusts the dates for the
established special local regulations. This temporary interim rule
provides public notice of the changed date and is necessary to ensure
the safety of participants, crew, spectators, participating vessels,
and other vessels and users of the waterway. Unauthorized persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within the special local regulations unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP), or his designated representative. The Coast
Guard requests public comments on the temporary interim rule.

DATES: This rule is effective from March 15, 2015 through April 15,
2015. This rule will be enforced from 7 a.m. until 6:30 p.m. March 28,
2015 and from 7 a.m. until 3:30 p.m. on March 29, 2015. Public comments
must be received by March 16, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments using one of the listed methods, and see
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for more information on public comments.
     Online--http://www.regulations.gov following Web site
instructions.
     Fax--202-493-2251.
     Mail or hand deliver--Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Hand
delivery hours: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>).
    Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket [USCG-2014-
1063]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available
in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the docket number
in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder
on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation, West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Nick Bateman, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego, Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DH Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TIR Temporary Interim Rule
BN Broadcast Notice to Mariners
LNM Local Notice to Mariners
COTP Captain of the Port

A. Public Participation and Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments (or related material) on this
temporary interim rule. We will consider all submissions and may adjust
our final action based on your comments. Comments should be marked with
docket number USCG-2014-1063 and should provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You should provide personal contact
information so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your comments; but please note that all comments will be posted to the
online docket without change and that any personal information you
include can be searchable online (see the Federal Register Privacy Act
notice regarding our public dockets, 73 FR 3316, Jan. 17, 2008).
    Mailed or hand-delivered comments should be in an unbound 8\1/2\ x
11 inch format suitable for reproduction. The Docket Management
Facility will acknowledge receipt of mailed comments if you enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope with your submission.
    Documents mentioned in this interim rule, and all public comments,
are in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be
viewed by following the Web site's instructions. You can also view the
docket at the Docket Management Facility (see the mailing address under
ADDRESSES) between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.

B. Regulatory History and Information

    The San Diego Crew Classic is an annual rowing race listed in 33
CFR 100.1101 (table 1, item 3) for Southern California annual marine
events for the San Diego Captain of the Port Zone. Special local
regulations exist for the marine event to allow for special use of the
Mission Bay waterway to allow for two days of racing. The event is
normally held in April. For 2015, the event's organizer has shifted the
dates up from April to March. This temporary interim rule is therefore
necessary to ensure that the same measures normally provided in April
by the marine event special local regulations are in place for the
March 2015 dates.
    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary interim rule without
prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under
section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without
prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause
finds that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest.''
    We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a NPRM. The publishing of an NPRM would
be impracticable since immediate action is needed to minimize potential
danger to the participants and the public during the event. The danger
posed by the large volume of weekend marine traffic in Mission Bay
makes special local regulations necessary to provide for the safety of
participants, event support vessels, spectator craft and other vessels
transiting the event area. For the safety concerns noted, it is
important to have these regulations in effect during the event. The
Coast Guard was not informed of the changed date of the event with
sufficient time to solicit comments through an NPRM and publish a final
rule. This interim rule allows the Coast Guard to publish the
regulatory text but still receive comments on the impact, if any, the
rule will have. The Coast Guard will consider any comments received
prior to the event date.
    To advise the public of the restrictions, the Coast Guard will
issue a broadcast notice to mariners (BNM) to advise vessel operators
of navigational restrictions. In addition, Coast Guard will also
advertise notice of the event and event date changes via local notice
to mariners (LNM) report. On-scene Coast Guard and local law
enforcement vessels will also provide actual notice to mariners. For
the same reasons, the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. Delaying the effective date would be contrary to the
public interest, because immediate action is needed to ensure the
safety of the event. However, notifications will be made to users of
the affected area near Mission Bay, San Diego, California via marine
information broadcast and a local notice to mariners.
    Furthermore, we are providing an opportunity for subsequent public
comment and, should public comment show the need for modifications to
the special local regulations during the 2015 event, we may make those
modifications and will provide actual notice of those modifications to
the affected public.

C. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis and authorities for this rule are found in 33
U.S.C. 1233, which authorize the Coast Guard to establish, and define
special local regulations. The Captain of the Port San Diego is
establishing a special local regulation for the waters of Mission Bay,
San Diego, California to protect event participants, spectators and
transiting vessels. Entry into this area is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port San Diego or
designated representative.

D. Discussion of the Rule

    The San Diego Crew Classic is an annual rowing race normally held
on the first Saturday and Sunday in April in Mission Bay, San Diego,
California.
    The regulation listing annual marine events within the San Diego
Captain of the Port Zone and special local regulations is 33 CFR
100.1101. Table 1 to Sec.  100.1101 identifies special local
regulations within the COTP San Diego Zone. Table 1 to Sec.  100.1101
at item ``3'' describes the enforcement date and regulated location for
this marine event.
    The date listed in the Table has the marine event on the first
Saturday and Sunday in April. However, this temporary rule changes the
marine event date to 28 March, 2015 and 29 March, 2015 to reflect the
actual date of the event this year.
    The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary special local
regulation for a marine event on Mission Bay that will be enforced from
7 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on March 28, 2015 and from 7 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on
March 29, 2015. The effect of the temporary special local regulations
will be to restrict navigation in the vicinity of the rowing race site
until the conclusion of the races. The limits of the special local
regulation will include portions of the navigable waters of Mission Bay
known as Fiesta Bay in Mission Bay, San Diego, California.
    The Coast Guard will temporarily suspend the regulation listed in
Table 1 to Sec.  100.1101 item ``3'', and insert this temporary
regulation at Table 1 to Sec.  100.1101, at item ``19''. The special
local regulation will be enforced from 7 a.m. until 6:30 p.m. March 28,
2015 and from 7 a.m. until 3:30 p.m. on March 29, 2015. This change is
needed to accommodate the sponsor's event plan. No other portion of
Table 1 to Sec.  100.1101 or other provisions in Sec.  100.1101 shall
be affected by this regulation.
    The special local regulations are necessary to provide for the
safety of the crew, spectators, participants, and other vessels and
users of the waterway for this competitive rowing race that will
consist of a 2,000 meters long eight lane course, utilized over two
weekend days. Persons and vessels will be prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or anchoring within this regulated waterway
unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port (COTP), or his
designated representative, during the proposed times. The two day event
will include racing on Saturday and Sunday. Before the effective
period, the Coast Guard will publish information on the event in the
weekly LNM.

E. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. We expect the economic
impact of this rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation
is unnecessary. This determination is based on the size, location, and
the limited duration of the marine event and associated special local
regulations. Optional waterway routes exist to allow boaters to transit
around the marine event area, without impacting the racing.
Additionally, to the maximum extent practicable, the event sponsor will
assist with the movement of boaters desiring to transit the racing area
during non-racing times throughout the two days.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in the impacted portion of Mission Bay,
San Diego, California from 7 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on March 28, 2015 and 7
a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on March 29, 2015.
    This special local regulation will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Although the special
local regulations would apply to a broad portion of Mission Bay,
traffic would be allowed to pass around the zone or through the zone
with the permission of the COTP, or his designated representative. The
event sponsor, in addition to advertising the event, will also to their
maximum extent assist boaters wishing to transit the racing area during
non-racing times throughout the two days. Before the effective period,
the Coast Guard will publish event information on the internet in the
weekly LNM marine information report. And during the event, the Coast
Guard will provide a BNM via marine radio.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the

person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received
without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or
vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves establishment of marine event special
local regulations on the navigable waters of Mission Bay. This rule is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(h) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.

0
2. In Sec.  100.1101, in Table 1 to Sec.  100.1101, suspend item ``3''
and add temporary item ``19'' to read as follows:

Sec.  100.1101  Southern California Annual Marine Events for the San
Diego Captain of the Port Zone.

* * * * *

                       Table 1 to Sec.   100.1101
              [All coordinates referenced use datum NAD 83]
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       19. San Diego Crew Classic
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsor..........................................  San Diego Crew
                                                    Classic.
Event Description................................  Competitive Rowing
                                                    Race.
Date.............................................  March 28, 2015 and
                                                    March 29, 2015.
Location.........................................  Mission Bay, San
                                                    Diego, CA.
Regulated Area...................................  The waters of Mission
                                                    Bay to include.
                                                    South Pacific
                                                    Passage, Fiesta Bay,
                                                    and the waters
                                                    around Vacation
                                                    Isle.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: January 30, 2015.
J.S. Spaner,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2015-02964 Filed 2-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 41706]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14922]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1046-000.
    Applicants: NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Vitol 860537
eff 07-01-22 to be effective 7/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/6/22.
    Accession Number: 20220706-5063.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/18/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 7, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-14922 Filed 7-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


  Check if information below is identical to the information submitted last year.
                                                        Tier Two
                                 Emergency and Hazardous Chemical Inventory
                                         Specific Information by Chemical
 For Official Use Only
 State ID#:
 Date Received
 Facility Identification
 Name	Maximum No. of Occupants:	 Manned	Unmanned
                                                     N/A
 Street	County	City	State	Zip
 Latitude	Longitude	NAICS Code	Phone Number (optional)
                                                                            (	)
 Dun & Bradstreet Number	TRI Facility ID:	RMP Facility ID:
                                   N/A	 N/A
 Subject to Emergency Planning under Section 302 of EPCRA (40 CFR part 355)?  	 Yes  	 No
 Subject to Chemical Accident Prevention under Section 112(r) of CAA (40 CFR part 68, Risk Management Program)?  	 Yes  	 No
 Owner or Operator Information
 Parent Company Information (optional)
 Name
 Name	Dun & Bradstreet Number:
 Address
 Address
 Phone Number	Email
 (	)
 Phone Number	Email
 (	)
 Facility Emergency Coordinator (if applicable)	Tier II Information Contact
 Name	Title
 Name	Title
 Email Address
 Email Address
 Phone Number	24-hour Phone
 (	)	(	)
 Phone Number
 (	)
                                                  Emergency Contacts
 Name
 Name
 Title
 Title
 Phone Number	24-hour Phone
 (	)	(	)
 Phone Number	24-hour Phone
 (	)	(	)
 Email Address
 Email Address
   Certification (Read and sign after completing all sections)
                                        Reporting Ranges
                                    Weight Range in pounds

    I certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in pages one through
   , and that based on my inquiry of those individuals responsible for obtaining the information, I believe that the submitted information is
                                true, accurate and complete.

     Name and official title of owner/operator OR owner/operator's authorized representative

      ____________________         _____________
   Signature	Date Signed
   Range Code	From	To

      01	0	99
      02	100	499
      03	500	999
      04	1,000	4,999
      05	5,000	9,999
      06	10,000	24,999
      07	25,000	49,999
      08	50,000	74,999
      09	75,000	99,999
      10	100,000	499,999
      11	500,000	999,999
      12	1,000,000	9,999,999
      13	10,000,000	Greater than 10 million
 This collection of information is approved by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. (OMB Control No. 2050-0072). Responses to this collection of information are mandatory (40 CFR 370). An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to range from 6 to 120 hours per response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden to the Regulatory Support Division Director, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2821T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address.

                             Chemical Description
                               Physical Hazards
                                Health Hazards
                                   Inventory
                                Type of Storage
                  Storage Conditions (Pressure, Temperature)
                              Storage
Locations
                  Additional Reporting Information (Optional)

  Check if information below is identical to the information submitted last year.

 Chemical Name:

 CAS No.

 EHS:   Yes  	No  

  Solid    Liquid   Gas

  Trade Secret

    Explosive
       Flammable (gases, aerosols, liquids, or solids)
       Oxidizer (liquid, solid or gas)
    Self-reactive
       Pyrophoric (liquid or solid)
       Pyrophoric Gas
    Self-heating
    Organic peroxide
    Corrosive to metal
       Gas under pressure (compressed gas)
       In contact with water emits flammable gas
    Combustible Dust
       Hazard Not Otherwise
Classified

       Acute toxicity (any route of exposure)
    Skin corrosion or irritation
       Serious eye damage or eye irritation
       Respiratory or skin
sensitization
    Germ cell mutagenicity
       Carcinogenicity
    Reproductive toxicity
       Specific target organ toxicity (single or repeated exposure)
    Aspiration hazard
    Simple Asphyxiant
       Hazard Not Otherwise
Classified

 Maximum Amount
 Range Code:

 Confidential:
  Yes     No

  Below Reporting
Thresholds (optional)

  State
or Local
 Requirements

 Average Daily
 Amount
 Range Code:

 No. of days on site:

  Check if information below is identical to the information submitted last year.

 Mixture or Product Name:

 CAS No.
 Not Available

  Solid    Liquid   Gas	 Trade Secret

 EHS:   Yes  	No  

    Explosive
       Flammable (gases, aerosols, liquids, or solids)
       Oxidizer (liquid, solid or gas)
    Self-reactive
       Pyrophoric (liquid or solid)
       Pyrophoric Gas
    Self-heating
    Organic peroxide
    Corrosive to metal
       Gas under pressure (compressed gas)
       In contact with water emits flammable gas
    Combustible Dust
       Hazard Not Otherwise
Classified

       Acute toxicity (any route of    exposure)
    Skin corrosion or irritation
       Serious eye damage or eye irritation
       Respiratory or skin
sensitization
    Germ cell mutagenicity
       Carcinogenicity
    Reproductive toxicity
       Specific target organ toxicity (single or repeated exposure)
    Aspiration hazard
    Simple Asphyxiant
    Hazard Not Otherwise
        Classified

 Maximum Amount (Total Mixture) Range Code:

 Confidential:
  Yes     No

  Below Reporting Thresholds (optional)

  State
or Local
 Requirements

 Average Daily Amount (Total Mixture) Range Code:

 EHS(s) Name (if applicable):

 CAS No.

 No. of days on site:

 Maximum Amount of each EHS in the Mixture
 Range Code:

 Non-EHS(s) Name (optional):

     Optional Attachments:	 I have attached a site plan	 I have attached a list of site coordinate abbreviations 	 I have attached a description of dikes and other safeguard measures


Fenarimol Summary Uses $ Fenarimol is a fungicide registered for use on apples, bananas, cherries, filberts, grapes, pears, pecans. It is also registered for use on ornamental plants, trees, and residential/ recreational turf. Fenarimol is a systemic fungicide that inhibits fungal growth.

$ Fenarimol is formulated as a flowable concentrate, granular, soluble concentrate/ liquid, and emulsifiable concentrate. Fenarimol can be applied by a belly grinder, push type spreader, and low or high volume ground sprayers.

$ For treating fruit and nut trees, the maximum fenarimol application rate is 0.09375 lb ai/ A. For the turf use, the maximum rate is 2.73 lb ai/ A.

$ Approximately 61,000 pounds of fenarimol active ingredient are used in the U. S. annually. The turf use comprises 28% or approximately 17,000 pounds of the total use.

Health Effects

Fenarimol has moderate acute toxicity. The developmental and reproductive toxicity studies showed no evidence of increased sensitivity or susceptibility of young rats or rabbits following pre or postnatal exposure to fenarimol.

$ In the rat multi generation reproduction studies there was an inhibition of aromatase. Aromatase, also known as estrogen synthetase, is the key enzyme for the conversion of androgens to estrogens and is therefore a potentially critical enzyme in maintaining hormone balance in human physiology.

$ The multi generation reproduction studies indicate that fenarimol causes reduced fertility and dystocia ( difficult labor). These effects of fenarimol were demonstrated to be attributed to inhibition of aromatase in adult animals.

$ The 10x FQPA Safety Factor has been reduced to 3x to account for the potential increased sensitivity of young organisms to the hormonal effects elicited by fenarimol's inhibition of aromatase.

Dietary Risks $ No appropriate endpoint was identified to estimate risk from a single dose of fenarimol. Therefore, an acute dietary exposure assessment was not performed. 2 $ Based on highly refined analyses, chronic dietary risk from exposure to fenarimol is low (< 1% of the Population Adjusted Dose) for all populations and is below the Agency's level of concern.

Drinking Water Risks $ Based on SCI GROW ( Tier I) modeling for ground water, the chronic EECs are below the DWLOCs for all populations indicating that chronic exposure to fenarimol in ground water is not of concern.

$ Based on FIRST ( Tier I) modeling for surface water, using the highest application rate for turf, the chronic EECs exceeds the DWLOC for all populations indicating that chronic exposure to fenarimol in surface water is potentially of concern.

$ The EECs for surface and ground water are based on upper end input parameters such as 87% of a watershed being treated at the maximum application.

$ Additional data are being required that will provide important information on the mobility of fenarimol and its degradates. These studies may help to refine the assessment.

Residential Postapplication Risks $ A Margin of Exposure ( MOE), of greater than 900 does not exceed the Agency's level of concern for residential postapplication risk.

$ Risk estimates for dermal contact with treated turf during high contact lawn activities exceed the Agency's level of concern ( MOEs < 900) for children with an MOE of 660.

$ Risk estimates for dermal contact with treated turf on the day of treatment do not exceed the level of concern for adults during the low contact activities of grass mowing ( MOE = 27,000) or golfing ( MOE = 14,000).

$ Risk estimates for small children from non dietary hand to mouth activities indicate that risks slightly exceed the level of concern ( MOE 860).

$ Incidental ingestion of soil ( MOE = 260,000) and incidental turfgrass mouthing ( MOE = 3400) did not exceed the level of concern $ The small children's combined oral hand to mouth scenarios exceeds the level of concern ( MOE = 690). When risk estimates to small children from short term dermal exposures are combined with risk estimates from all incidental oral exposures the combined short term risk estimate exceeds the level of concern ( MOE = 340). 3 Aggregate Risks $ The aggregate risk assessment for fenarimol examines the combined risk from exposure through food, drinking water, and residential exposures where applicable.

$ Because an acute toxicity endpoint was not identified, an acute aggregate risk assessment is not required.

$ The registrants have agreed to remove residential uses from their labels while data are developed to address uncertainty related to effects on children. Thus, aggregate risk has been recalculated excluding exposure from residential use.

$ For the short term aggregate risk assessment dermal postapplication exposure for adult golfers was combined with the average dietary ( food & water) exposures. The short term DWLOCs for adult males and females are well above the estimated EECs for ground and surface water indicating that combined short term dietary ( food & water) and dermal exposures do not exceed the Agency's level of concern.

$ The EEC for surface water ( 26 ppb) slightly exceeds the DWLOC ( 20 ppb) for children under 6. However, the estimated EEC for surface water is a very conservative estimate. Also, given the relatively low usage of fenarimol across the country it is highly unlikely that the amount applied to the watershed in the model will be concentrated in any real watershed used to derive drinking water.

$ The EEC for ground water is less than all DWLOCs; therefore, there is no concern for aggregate chronic exposure to fenarimol and its degradates from food and drinking water derived from ground water.

Occupational and Ecological Risks $ Because fenarimol is under review for tolerance reassessment only, no occupational or ecological risk assessment was conducted.


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 4, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 62656]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26401]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the
Securities and Exchange Commission staff will hold a Municipal
Securities Disclosure Conference on Thursday, December 6, 2018,
beginning at 9:30 a.m. ET.

PLACE: The meeting will be held in the Auditorium, Room L-002, at the
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: The conference will begin at 9:30 a.m. ET and will be open to
the public. Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Doors
will open at 8:00 a.m. Visitors will be subject to security checks. The
conference will be webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The agenda for the conference will include
topics related to municipal securities disclosure. Panelists will
include industry experts, regulators and issuers. Panelists will be
discussing topics such as financial distress and municipal securities
disclosure, lessons from municipal disclosure enforcement cases,
developments in disclosure technology and the future of municipal
securities disclosure. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because
a majority of the Commission may attend the conference.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information, please
contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-
5400.

    Dated: November 29, 2018.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-26401 Filed 11-30-18; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


 [Federal Register Volume 82, Number 159 (Friday, August 18, 2017)] [Notices] [Page 39421] [FR Doc No: 2017-17478]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER17-2282-000]

Champion Solar, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-

Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204

Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding

Champion Solar, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with

an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a

request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future

issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,

DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's

Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone

filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that

document on the Applicant.

    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with

regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18

CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of

liability, is August 31, 2017.

    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and

interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an

intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the

eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the

intervention or protests.

    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and

5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.

    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in

the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in

the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the

Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an

eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive

email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).

For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY,

call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 11, 2017.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-17478 Filed 8-17-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 71 (Tuesday, April 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19982]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08588]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2013-0677; FRL-9925-21]

Receipt of Test Data Under the Toxic Substances Control Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is announcing its receipt of test data submitted pursuant
to a test rule issued by EPA under the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA). As required by TSCA, this document identifies each chemical
substance and/or mixture for which test data have been received; the
uses or intended uses of such chemical substance and/or mixture; and
describes the nature of the test data received. Each chemical substance
and/or mixture related to this announcement is identified in Unit I.
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact:
Kathy Calvo, Chemical Control Division (7405M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 564-8089; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Chemical Substances and/or Mixtures

    Information about the following chemical substances and/or mixtures
is provided in Unit IV.:
    A. Methanone, diphenyl- (CAS No. 119-61-9).
    B. Ethane, 1,1'-oxybis[2-chloro- (CAS No. 111-44-4).

II. Federal Register Publication Requirement

    Section 4(d) of TSCA (15 U.S.C. 2603(d)) requires EPA to publish a
notice in the Federal Register reporting the receipt of test data
submitted pursuant to test rules promulgated under TSCA section 4 (15
U.S.C. 2603).

III. Docket Information

    A docket, identified by the docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPPT-2013-0677, has been established for this Federal Register
document that announces the receipt of data. Upon EPA's completion of
its quality assurance review, the test data received will be added to
the docket for the TSCA section 4 test rule that required the test
data. Use the docket ID number provided in Unit IV. to access the test
data in the docket for the related TSCA section 4 test rule.
    The docket for this Federal Register document and the docket for
each related TSCA section 4 test rule is available electronically at
http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket), Environmental Protection
Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg.,
Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPPT
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

IV. Test Data Received

    This unit contains the information required by TSCA section 4(d)
for the test data received by EPA.

A. Methanone, diphenyl- (CAS No. 119-61-9)

    1. Chemical Use(s): In hair mousse as a fixative for heavy
perfumes; in making antihistamines, hypnotics, insecticides, and
ultraviolet absorbers; in flavoring; as a polymerization inhibitor for
styrene; and in industry product finishes.
    2. Applicable Test Rule: Chemical testing requirements for second
group of high production volume chemicals (HPV2), 40 CFR (799.5087).
    3. Test Data Received: The following listing describes the nature
of the test data received. The test data will be added to the docket
for the applicable TSCA section 4 test rule and can be found by
referencing the docket ID number provided. EPA reviews of test data
will be added to the same docket upon completion.
    Aquatic Toxicity. The docket ID number assigned to this data is
EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531-0832.

B. Ethane, 1,1'-oxybis[2-chloro- (CAS No. 111-44-4)

    1. Chemical Use(s): Scavenges lead deposits in gasoline; an
anesthetic; an acaricide; in the manufacture of medicines and
pharmaceuticals; in an oil solution sprayed on corn silks to control
earworms; as a general solvent; a selective solvent for production of
high-grade lubricating oils; an intermediate and crosslinking agent in
organic synthesis; textile scouring and cleansing in fulling compounds;
in wetting and penetrating compounds; in paints, varnishes, lacquers,
finish removers, spotting and dry cleaning; in soil fumigants.
    2. Applicable Test Rule: Chemical testing requirements for third
group of high production volume chemicals (HIPV3), 40 CFR (799.5089).
    3. Test Data Received: The following listing describes the nature
of the test data received. The test data will be added to the docket
for the applicable TSCA section 4 test rule and can be found by
referencing the docket ID number provided. EPA reviews of test data
will be added to the same docket upon completion.
    Aquatic Toxicity (Algae). The docket ID number assigned to this
data is EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0531-0112.

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.

    Dated: April 6, 2015.
Maria J. Doa,
Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2015-08588 Filed 4-13-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 111 (Monday, June 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 26921]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12051]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL17-76-000]

Notice of Complaint: East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. v.
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Southwestern Electric Power
Company, AEP Oklahoma Transmission Company, AEP Southwestern
Transmission Company

    Take notice that on June 5, 2017, pursuant to sections 206, 306,
and 309 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824e, 825e, and 825h and
Rules 206 and 212 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's
(Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 and
385.212 (2016), East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Complainant)
filed a formal complaint against Public Service Company of Oklahoma,
Southwestern Electric Power Company, AEP Oklahoma Transmission Company
and AEP Southwestern Transmission Company, (Respondents or AEP West
Companies) alleging that, the 10.70 percent base return on common
equity currently included in the formula transmission rates of the AEP
West Companies is unjust and unreasonable and should be reduced, all as
more fully explained in the complaint.
    The Complainant states that ETEC certifies that copies of the
complaint were served in accordance with Rule 206(c).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
eLibrary link and is available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on June 26, 2017.

    Dated: June 6, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-12051 Filed 6-9-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P