[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 26, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44640-44642]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18822]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-64938; File No. SR-Phlx-2011-93]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
a Service Fee on QCC Orders and Floor QCC Orders

July 20, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4\2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that, on July 11, 2011, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to adopt a Service
Fee of $0.05 per side for Qualified Contingent Cross (``QCC'') Orders
(electronic) \3\ and Floor QCC Orders.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ A QCC Order is comprised of an order to buy or sell at least
1000 contracts that is identified as being part of a qualified
contingent trade, as that term is defined in Rule 1080(o)(3),
coupled with a contra-side order to buy or sell an equal number of
contracts. The QCC Order must be executed at a price at or between
the National Best Bid and Offer and be rejected if a Customer order
is resting on the Exchange book at the same price. A QCC Order shall
only be submitted electronically from off the floor to the PHLX XL
II System. See Rule 1080(o). See also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 64249 (April 7, 2011), 76 FR 20773 (April 13, 2011) (SR-
Phlx-2011-47) (a rule change to establish a QCC Order to facilitate
the execution of stock/option Qualified Contingent Trades (``QCTs'')
that satisfy the requirements of the trade through exemption in
connection with Rule 611(d) of the Regulation NMS).
    \4\ A Floor QCC Order must: (i) Be for at least 1,000 contracts,
(ii) meet the six requirements of Rule 1080(o)(3) which are modeled
on the QCT Exemption, (iii) be executed at a price at or between the
National Best Bid and Offer (``NBBO''); and (iv) be rejected if a
Customer order is resting on the Exchange book at the same price. In
order to satisfy the 1,000-contract requirement, a Floor QCC Order
must be for 1,000 contracts and could not be, for example, two 500-
contract orders or two 500-contract legs. See Rule 1064(e). See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64688 (June 16, 2011), 76 FR
36606 (June 22, 2011) (SR-Phlx-2011-56) (a rule change to establish
a qualified contingent cross order for execution on the floor of the
Exchange).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaqtrader.com/micro.aspx?id=PHLXRulefilings, at
the principal office of the Exchange, at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, and on the Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to adopt a Service Fee
for both QCC Orders (electronic) and Floor QCC Orders once a Firm
reaches the Firm Related Equity Option Cap (``Cap''), which is
described below. The Exchange proposes this Service Fee recognizing
that the qualified contingent cross capability is a premium service
offered by the Exchange. This Service Fee is proposed to recoup costs
incurred by the Exchange to offer this capability including trade
matching and processing, post trade allocation, submission for clearing
and customer service activities related to trading activity on the
Exchange.
    Firms are subject to a $75,000 Cap. Firm equity option transaction
charges and QCC Transaction Fees, in the aggregate, for one billing
month may not exceed the Cap per member organization when such members
are trading in their own proprietary account. The Firm equity options
transaction charges are waived for members executing facilitation
orders pursuant to Exchange Rule 1064 when such members are trading in
their own proprietary account.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ In addition, Firms that (i) Are on the contra-side of an
electronically-delivered and executed Customer complex order; and
(ii) have reached the Cap will be assessed a $0.05 per contract fee.
See Section II of the Exchange's Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to adopt a Service Fee of $0.05 per side once
a Firm has reached the Cap. This $0.05 per side Service Fee will apply
to every contract side of a QCC Order (electronic) and Floor QCC Order
that is executed once a Firm has reached the Cap in a particular
calendar month. A Firm that does not reach the Cap in a particular
calendar month will not be assessed the Service Fee in that month. The
Exchange proposes to add text to Section II of the Fee Schedule
entitled ``Equity Options Fees'' to describe the Service Fee. The
Exchange also proposes to add a clarifying sentence to Section II of
the Fee Schedule to clarify that QCC Transaction Fees are included in
the monthly calculation of the Cap.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64520 (May 19,
2011), 76 FR 30223 (May 24, 2011) (SR-Phlx-2011-66) (a rule change
to adopt fees applicable to a Qualified Contingent Cross Order) and
SR-Phlx-2011-84 (an immediately effective proposed rule change to
adopt fees applicable to a Floor Qualified Contingent Cross order).
QCC Transaction Fees are defined in Section II of the Fee Schedule
as applicable to QCC Orders, as defined in Exchange Rule 1080(o),
and Floor QCC Orders, as defined in 1064(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Fee Schedule
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \7\ in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \8\ in particular, in that
it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees and other charges
among Exchange members and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed Service Fee is reasonable
because Firms have the ability to cap fees and even with the added
Service Fee, Firms should generally pay less once they reach the Cap
because they will not pay the normally applicable transaction fees.
This Service Fee would reduce the discrepancy that exists today between
Firms and other market participants. For example, Firms who reach the
Cap in a particular month would pay the Service Fee instead of other
normally applicable transaction fees as a result of reaching the Cap.
As stated in the filing, the Service Fee does not apply to Firms who
did not reach the Cap. Also, the Exchange believes that the Service Fee
is reasonable because the fee would allow the Exchange to defray costs
incurred in providing the qualified contingent cross capability in the
form of QCC Orders (electronic) and Floor QCC Orders. Specifically, the
Exchange is providing trade matching and processing, post trade
allocation, submission for clearing and customer service activities
related to trading activity on the Exchange. The Exchange also believes
that the Service Fee is reasonable because it is comparable to a fee
assessed by the International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE''). ISE
assesses a $0.05 per side service fee for qualified contingent cross
volume once a member reaches the monthly fee cap.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See ISE's Schedule of Fees. See also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 64270 (April 8, 2011), 76 FR 20754 (April 13, 2011) (SR-
ISE-2011-13).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed Service Fee is equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because it would be uniformly applied
to Firms in the same way that the Cap is uniformly available to these
Firms.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\10\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.

Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2011-93 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2011-93. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2011-93 and should be
submitted on or August 16, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-18822 Filed 7-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 18 (Monday, January 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 5860]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01709]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Reduction of
Fuel Tank Flammability on Transport Category Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The FAA's Fuel Tank Flammability rule requires
manufacturers to report to the FAA every six months for up to 5 years
after the flammability reduction system is incorporated into the fleet.
The data is needed to assure system performance meets that predicted at
the time of certification.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by March 29, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy DePaepe at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0710.
    Title: Reduction of Fuel Tank Flammability on Transport Category
Airplanes.
    Form Numbers: There are no FAA forms associated with this
collection.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: Design approval holders use flammability analysis
documentation to demonstrate to their FAA Oversight Office that they
are compliant with the Fuel Tank Flammability Safety rule (73 FR
42443). Semi-annual reports submitted by design approval holders
provide listings of component failures discovered during scheduled or
unscheduled maintenance so that the reliability of the flammability
reduction means can be verified by the FAA.
    Respondents: Approximately 5 design approval holders.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 100 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 4,000 hours.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Kathy
DePaepe, Room 126B, Federal Aviation Administration, AES-200, 6500 S.
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 22, 2013.
Albert R. Spence,
FAA Assistant Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises
Business Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2013-01709 Filed 1-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


 From:       Richard Krock<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

  To:         Jodi Howard/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

  Date:       09/28/2010 09:59 AM

  Subject:    Vinyl Institute Updated Concentration Data Base for PVC Resin

Dear Ms. Howard,

Late last week it came to my attention that I incorrectly used PolyOne’s
original resin test data submittal reported in pounds per day (dry) as
their concentration data for the Vinyl Institute’s September 16, 2010
submission of its Concentration Data Base.  I received PolyOne’s resin
concentration data for their two plants last Friday and I have replaced
the mass data with the correct concentration data  in ppm.  Please use
this version of the VI’s spreadsheets for any future estimations or
determinations in establishing the PVC MACT rule.  Please do not
hesitate to contact me with any questions.  Thank you for the
opportunity to submit this corrected information.

Regards,

Richard Krock
Technical Director

The Vinyl Institute
1737 King Street Suite 390
Alexandria, VA 22314
Direct:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Mobile:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>http://www.vinylinfo.org
http://www.vinylindesign.com(See attached file: VI PVC Industry Resin
Concentration Data Aggregation for EPA 09-28-10.xls)


[Federal Register: August 23, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 162)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 51696-51698]
[DOCID:fr23au10-20]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0042; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-010-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Saab AB, Saab Aerosystems Model SAAB
340A (SAAB/SF340A) and SAAB 340B Airplanes Modified in Accordance With
Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SA00224WI-D, ST00146WI-D, or
SA984GL-D

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening of
comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier proposed airworthiness directive
(AD) for certain Saab AB, Saab Aerosystems Model SAAB 340A (SAAB/
SF340A) and SAAB 340B airplanes. The original NPRM would have required
inspecting the fuselage surface for corrosion and cracking behind the
external adapter plate of the antennae installation, and repair if
necessary. The original NPRM resulted from a report of a crack found
behind the external adapter plate of the antennae during inspection.
Similar cracking was found on two additional airplanes, and extensive
corrosion was found on one airplane. This action revises the original
NPRM by correcting an STC number, which would expand the applicability
of the original NPRM. We are proposing this supplemental NPRM to detect
and correct corrosion and cracking behind the external adapter plate of
the antennae of certain damage-tolerant structure, which could result
in reduced structural integrity and consequent rapid depressurization
of the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this supplemental NPRM by September
17, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Griffith, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE-118W, FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office,
1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas
67209; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0042;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-010-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) (the ``original
NPRM'') to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an airworthiness directive
(AD) that would apply to certain Saab AB, Saab Aerosystems Model SAAB
340A (SAAB/SF340A) and SAAB 340B airplanes. That original NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on January 19, 2010 (75 FR 2829).
That original NPRM proposed to require inspecting the fuselage surface
for corrosion and cracking behind the external adapter plate of the
antennae installation, and repair if necessary.

Actions Since Original NPRM Was Issued

    Since we issued the original NPRM, we have determined that STC
number SA00244WI-D, identified in the applicability of the NPRM, is an
incorrect STC number; the correct number is SA00224WI-D. We have
corrected this error, which expands the airplanes affected by the
original NPRM.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.

Request To Change the Description of the Unsafe Condition

    Saab AB/Aerosystems asks that we change the description of the
unsafe condition specified in the NPRM. Saab states that the NPRM
indicates that the fuselage skin is classified as ``certain safe-life
structure.'' Saab notes that this does not meet the definition of the
airframe/fuselage structure; the fuselage skin is damage tolerant
structure according to Section 25.571 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 25.571). Saab adds that this definition is included
in the fatigue critical baseline structure (FCBS) list.
    We agree with the commenter for the reasons provided. We have
changed the description of the unsafe condition in the Summary section
and paragraph (e) of this AD accordingly.

Request To Define Method To Repair Discrepancies

    Saab asks that we define the method necessary to repair the
discrepancies specified in the NPRM. Saab states that the NPRM does not
give any details on how to repair those discrepancies. Saab adds that
the method in the NPRM specifies that only approval by the Manager,
Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), will be accepted.
    We disagree with the commenter. The discrepancies referred to in
this AD are corrosion, and cracking of the fuselage surface as a result
of that corrosion. Each airplane may exhibit different extremes of both
types of corrosion and cracking, and each repair must be evaluated by
the ACO based on the extent of the damage. We have not changed the AD
in this regard.

Request to Re-Evaluate the STC Procedures

    Saab states that it has reservations about the STC procedures for
installation of the TCAS antennae because of the possibility of
compromised long-term effects on the airplane. Saab notes that the
installation procedures include anchor nuts installed directly in the
skin without anchor nut places, acceptance of improper edge distances,
compromised surface protection, and no structural reinforcement of the
antennae.
    We infer that Saab is requesting re-evaluation of the STC
procedures; we do not agree. The STC was approved by us in 1991, and
there is not enough data at this time to warrant re-evaluation of the
STC procedures. Corrosion issues are more than likely the result of the
initial installer applying inadequate corrosion protection as indicated
by the initial fleet data. Without additional fleet data to confirm
otherwise, we cannot concur with any design inadequacies. Therefore, we
have not changed the AD in this regard.

Request To Include Replacement Procedure for the Adapter Plate

    Saab asks that a replacement procedure for corroded adapter plates
be included in Chapter 51-70-60 of the Saab Structural Repair Manual
(SRM). Saab states that typical installation of the antennae and
associated actions is outlined in the SRM, and the antennae plates are
subject to corrosion. Saab adds that a replacement procedure for the
adapter plate should be included in the SRM to allow operators to
install replacement plates according to design procedures.
    We acknowledge and agree with the commenter's concern that the STC
holder should have provided appropriate procedures for replacement of
corroded adapter plates. Once STC procedures are developed, approved,
and available, we might consider additional rulemaking. However, we
consider that any further delay in issuing this supplemental NPRM would
result in an unacceptable level of risk because doing so would allow
the unsafe condition to continue for an indefinite length of time.
Therefore, we have not changed the AD in this regard.

FAA's Determination and Proposed Requirements of the Supplemental NPRM

    We are proposing this supplemental NPRM because we evaluated all
pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is
likely to exist or develop on other products of these same type
designs. Certain changes described above expand the scope of the
original NPRM. As a result, we have determined that it is necessary to
reopen the comment period to provide additional opportunity for the
public to comment on this supplemental NPRM.

Explanation of Change to Costs of Compliance

    Since issuance of the original NPRM, we have increased the labor
rate used in the Costs of Compliance from $80 per work-hour to $85 per
work-hour. The Costs of Compliance information, below, reflects this
increase in the specified hourly labor rate.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 201 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The proposed inspection would take about 4 work hours
per airplane, at an average labor rate of $85 per work hour. Based on
these figures, the estimated cost of the proposed AD for U.S. operators
is $68,340, or $340 per airplane.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Saab AB, Saab Aerosystems: Docket No. FAA-2010-0042; Directorate
Identifier 2009-NM-010-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by September 17, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to the Saab AB, Saab Aerosystems airplanes,
certificated in any category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and
(c)(2) of this AD, that have been modified in

accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SA00224WI-D,
ST00146WI-D, or SA984GL-D.
    (1) Model SAAB 340A (SAAB/SF340A) airplanes, serial numbers 004
through 159 inclusive.
    (2) Model SAAB 340B airplanes, serial numbers 160 through 459
inclusive.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53:
Fuselage.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD results from a report of a crack found behind the
external adapter plate of the antennae during inspection. Similar
cracking was found on two additional airplanes, and extensive
corrosion was found on one airplane. The Federal Aviation
Administration is issuing this AD to detect and correct corrosion
and cracking behind the external adapter plate of the antennae of
certain damage-tolerant structure, which could result in reduced
structural integrity and consequent rapid depressurization of the
airplane.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified.

Inspection/Corrective Actions

    (g) Within 600 flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD: Remove the external adapter plate of the antennae installation
and do a general visual inspection of the fuselage surface for
corrosion and cracking behind the external adapter plate of the
antennae installation. If any corrosion or cracking is found, repair
before further flight. If no corrosion or cracking is found, before
further flight, ensure that proper corrosion protection has been
applied before reinstalling the adapter plate. Do all the actions
required by this paragraph in accordance with a method approved by
the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA.

    Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection
is: ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or
irregularity. This level of inspection is made from within touching
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror may be necessary to
ensure visual access to all surfaces in the inspection area. This
level of inspection is made under normally available lighting
conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or
droplight and may require removal or opening of access panels or
doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be required to gain
proximity to the area being checked.''

Reporting Requirement

    (h) At the applicable time specified in paragraph (h)(1) or
(h)(2) of this AD: Submit a report of the positive findings of the
inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD. Send the report to
the Manager, Wichita ACO. The report must contain, at a minimum, the
inspection results, a description of any discrepancies found, the
airplane serial number, and the number of flight cycles and flight
hours on the airplane since installation of the STC. Under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.),
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the
information collection requirements contained in this AD and has
assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
    (1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
    (2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this
AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the effective date of
this AD.

Special Flight Permit

    (i) Special flight permits, as described in Section 21.197 and
Section 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199), may be issued to operate the airplane to a location
where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished, but
concurrence by the Manager, Wichita ACO, FAA, is required prior to
issuance of the special flight permit.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (j)(1) The Manager, Wichita ACO, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: William Griffith,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ACE-118W, FAA, Wichita ACO,
1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas
67209; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.

    Issued in Renton, Washington on August 16, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-20852 Filed 8-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 26, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 24695]
[FR Doc No: E9-12063]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 26, 2009 / Rules
and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 91 and 135

[Docket No. FAA-2002-14002; Amendment Nos. 91-306 and 135-110]
RIN 2120-AJ46

Communication and Area Navigation Equipment (RNAV) Operations in
Remote Locations and Mountainous Terrain

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the amendment number in the final rule
published in the Federal Register on Friday, May 1, 2009. That final
rule amends the regulations to allow the use of the published Obstacle
Departure Procedures (ODP) or an alternative procedure or route
assigned by Air Traffic Control (ATC). Also, that final rule amends the
requirements to facilitate compliance and accurately reflect operating
conditions in areas in which the terrain impedes communications.

DATES: This amendment becomes effective June 30, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning
this final rule, contact Dennis Mills, Aviation Safety Inspector, Air
Transportation Division, Fight Standards Service, AFS-220, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20591; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For legal questions concerning this final rule,
contact Robert Hawks, General Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel,
Regulations Division, AGC-240, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-
7143, facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Correction: In the final rule, published in the Federal Register
issue of Friday, May 1, 2009 (74 FR 20202), make the following
correction--On page 20202, in the second column, the fifth line of the
heading, ``Amendment Nos. 91-306 and 135-110'' is corrected to read
``Amendment Nos. 91-306 and 135-116.''

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 19, 2009.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E9-12063 Filed 5-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 153 (Thursday, August 10, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54237-54239]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17168]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2023-0607]
RIN 1625-AA87

Safety Zone; HBPW James DeYoung Powerplant Explosive Demolition;
Macatawa

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone for the James
DeYoung Powerplant Explosive Demolition on August 10, 2023. This safety
zone is located on all waters of

the Macatawa River within a circle with a 1000-foot radius from the
demolition site located at the James DeYoung Powerplant in position
42[deg]47.726' N 086[deg]6.81' W. During the enforcement period, the
operator of any vessel in the regulated area must comply with
directions from the Patrol Commander or any Official Patrol displaying
a Coast Guard ensign.

DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30 a.m. through 9:45 a.m. August
10, 2023.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2023-0607 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Brianna Southard, USCG SECTOR Lake
Michigan--Waterways Management Division, U. S. Coast Guard; telephone
414-747-7188, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the event sponsor changed the date of
the demolition and did not provide the Captain of the Port enough
notice to accommodate the comment period. It is impracticable to
conduct a notice-and-comment rulemaking and have this temporary rule in
place by August 10, 2023.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to
ensure the safety vessels during the James DeYoung Powerplant Explosive
Demolition on August 10, 2023.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034. The Captain of the Port Sector Lake Michigan (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards associated with the explosive
demolition, will be a safety concern for anyone within a 1000-foot
radius of the demolition site. This rule is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters
within the safety zone during the demolition.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from 8:30 a.m. until 9:45 a.m.
on August 10, 2023. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters
within a 1000-foot radius of position 42[deg]47.726' N 086[deg]6.81' W
in the vicinity of the James DeYoung Powerplant on the Macatawa River,
Holland, MI. The duration of the zone is intended to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment in these navigable waters during
the demolition. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, location
and duration of the safety zone. The safety zone will impact a small
part of the waterway and is designed to minimize impact on navigable
waters. This rule will prohibit entry into certain navigable waters of
Macatawa River in Holland, MI, and is not anticipated to exceed 1 hour
in duration. Moreover, under certain conditions vessels may still
transit through the safety zone when permitted by the COTP Lake
Michigan.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves safety
zone with a 1000-foot radius on the Macatawa River around position
42[deg]47.726' N 086[deg]6.81' W on August 10, 2023, from 8:30 a.m.
until 9:45 a.m. It is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting
this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on
locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0607 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T09-0607  Safety Zone; Macatawa River, Holland, MI.

    (a) Location. Holland, MI. In the vicinity of the James DeYoung
Power Plant near the Macatawa River within 1000-feet of the demolition
site in position 42[deg]47.726' N 086[deg]6.8' W.
    (b) Regulations. The following regulations apply to this safety
zone.
    (1) The general regulations in Sec.  165.23.
    (2) All vessels must obtain permission from the Captain of the Port
(COTP) Lake Michigan or his or her designated representative to enter,
move within, or exit a safety zone established in this section when the
safety zone is enforced. Vessels and persons granted permission to
enter one of the safety zones listed in this section must obey all
lawful orders or directions of the COTP Lake Michigan or his or her
designated representative. Upon being hailed by the U.S. Coast Guard by
siren, radio, flashing light or other means, the operator of a vessel
must proceed as directed.
    (c) Enforcement period. The regulation in this section will be
enforced from 8:30 a.m. through 9:45 a.m. on August 10, 2023. The
Captain of the Port Sector Lake Michigan, or a designated
representative may suspend enforcement of the safety zone at any time.

    Dated: August 4, 2023.
Joseph B. Parker,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2023-17168 Filed 8-9-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 85 (Monday, May 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 25352]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10284]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Rule 15g-6, SEC File No. 270-349, OMB Control No. 3235-0395.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the
previously approved collection of information provided for in Rule 15g-
6--Account Statements for Penny Stock Customers--(17 CFR 240.15g-6)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
    Rule 15g-6 requires brokers and dealers that sell penny stocks to
provide their customers monthly account statements containing
information with regard to the penny stocks held in customer accounts.
The purpose of the rule is to increase the level of disclosure to
investors concerning penny stocks generally and specific penny stock
transactions.
    The Commission estimates that approximately 221 broker-dealers will
spend an average of 78 hours annually to comply with this rule. Thus,
the total compliance burden is approximately 17,238 burden-hours per
year.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following Web site: http://www.reginfo.gov. Comments
should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503 or by sending an email to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 or by sending an
email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted within 30 days
of this notice.

    Dated: April 28, 2015.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-10284 Filed 5-1-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55594-55595]
[FR Doc No: 2021-21825]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1151-000.
    Applicants: Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Submits tariff filing per 154.203: Operational
Purchase and Sale Report 2021 to be effective N/A under RP21-1150.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2021.
    Accession Number: 20210928-5040.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1164-000.
    Applicants: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates Filing on 9/
28/2021 to be effective 10/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 9/29/21.
    Accession Number: 20210929-5044.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1165-000.
    Docket Numbers: Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Remove Non-Conforming
Agreement (BHSC 215686) to be effective 11/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 9/29/21.
    Accession Number: 20210929-5045.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1166-000.
    Applicants: Mississippi Hub, LLC.
    Description: Annual Penalty Disbursement Report of Mississippi Hub,
LLC under RP21-1166.
    Filed Date: 9/29/21.
    Accession Number: 20210929-5062.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1167-000.
    Applicants: Enable Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2021 Annual Report of Penalty
Revenue Credits to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 9/29/21.
    Accession Number: 20210929-5076.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1168-000.
    Applicants: Enable Gas Transmission, LLC.

    Description: Compliance filing: 2021 Annual Report of Linked Firm
Service Penalty Revenue Credits to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 9/29/21.
    Accession Number: 20210929-5077.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1169-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Leidy East--
Six One Commodities to be effective 10/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 9/29/21.
    Accession Number: 20210929-5082.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1170-000.
    Applicants: Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
(Citadel) to be effective 11/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 9/29/21.
    Accession Number: 20210929-5085.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1171-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Annual Cash-Out Report Period
Ending July, 31, 2021 to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 9/29/21.
    Accession Number: 20210929-5102.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1172-000.
    Applicants: Great Basin Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Cancel 4th revised Tariff Volume No.
1-A to be effective 10/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 9/29/21.
    Accession Number: 20210929-5142.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/12/21.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 30, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-21825 Filed 10-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 190 (Thursday, October 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 59223]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24826]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. 2015-56]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; Robert
Ponti

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of Title 14 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. The purpose of this notice is to improve the public's
awareness of, and participation in, the FAA's exemption process.
Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of
information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of
the petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before October 21, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2015-3493
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra K. Long, Program Analyst, 202-
267-4714, Office of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591<EMAIL_ADDRESS>.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 25, 2015.
Lirio Liu,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2015-3493.
    Petitioner: Robert J. Ponti.
    Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 61.73(g).

Description of Relief Sought

    Petitioner seeks relief to obtain a flight instructor certificate
and rating based on his U.S. Military documentation as a designated
Instructor Co-Pilot.

[FR Doc. 2015-24826 Filed 9-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 3, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54338-54340]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21295]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-70264; File No. SR-BATS-2013-045]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Establish a Revenue Sharing Program

August 27, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on August 15, 2013, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BATS'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposed rule change to establish a revenue
sharing program with Interactive Data Corporation, acting by and
through its division, Interactive Data Desktop Solutions, and its
subsidiary, Interactive Data Online Properties, Inc. (collectively
``IDC''), whereby the Exchange will make available, through IDC,
private labeled versions of IDC's Market-Q and LiveCharts products.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at http://www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to establish a non-
exclusive revenue sharing program with IDC whereby the Exchange will
make available new market data offerings consisting of private labeled
versions of IDC's Market-Q and LiveCharts products. Pursuant to an
agreement between IDC and the Exchange, the private labeled products
will be marketed by the Exchange by featuring and advertising them on
the Exchange's Web site. Market-Q will be marketed under the private
label name ``BATS Investor Pro'' and LiveCharts will be marketed under
the private label name ``BATS Investor RT'' (BATS Investor Pro and BATS
Investor RT, collectively, the ``Private Labeled Products''). Under the
agreement, the Exchange will receive 25% of the total monthly
subscription fees received by IDC from parties who have registered to
use the Private Labeled Products and who first subscribe as a result of
the Exchange's marketing activities under the agreement, less certain
fees and taxes. IDC will operate and maintain the Private Labeled
Products and will provide first line technical support, accounting and
contract administration services for the Private Labeled Products. The
Exchange will not bill or contract with any subscriber directly.
    Market-Q, which was developed by IDC, is a browser-based, front-end
product that provides global real-time pricing information, corporate
actions and dividend data, news, research, and other financial and
market data, including charts and alerts. The data includes a broad
range of global exchanges and indices, including performance data,
historical pricing, fixed income, commodities, foreign exchange,
exchange-traded equity and derivative securities.\3\ LiveCharts, which
was also developed by IDC, is a browser-based, front-end product that
provides charting and technical analysis of global real-time market
data.\4\ BATS Investor Pro and BATS Investor RT will include only
market data from the Exchange.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ http://www.interactivedata.com/uploads/File/MArketQ.pdf.
    \4\ http://www.esignal.com/livecharts/default.aspx.
    \5\ Subscribers of BATS Investor Pro and BATS Investor RT may,
for an additional fee, supplement their subscriptions to include
market data in addition to Exchange data. This fee is not included
as part of the Exchange's revenue sharing program with IDC.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange intends to submit a separate proposed rule change with
pricing details for the Private Labeled Products.
    Various data recipients may wish to subscribe to and use the
Private Labeled Products. For instance, data recipients that receive
real-time market information on public Web sites or subscribe to
dynamic stock tickers, portfolio trackers, price/time graphs and other
visual systems can use the Private Labeled Products in lieu of using
such products. Such data recipients may prefer the Private Labeled
Products to view Exchange data to the extent they are familiar with
such products that include data from other markets. The Exchange notes
that similar market data products are offered by IDC containing data
from other exchanges and market centers.
    No Exchange participant is required to subscribe to the Private
Labeled Products because the same information is available in the
Exchange's other data feeds.\6\ Exchange participants can also gain
access to BATS quotations and last sale prices that are integrated with
the prices that other markets make available through the Security
Information Processors (``SIPs'') for the national market system plans
responsible for disseminating consolidated market information. Indeed,
even though the Private Labeled Products may provide to some
participants an efficient alternative to the consolidated price
information that investors and broker-dealers can receive on a
consolidated basis from the SIPs, the Exchange believes that the
information that the Exchange contributes to the consolidated tape and
the increasingly lower latency of the data feeds offered by the SIPs
will continue to satisfy the needs of the vast majority of individual
and professional investors. Although certain data recipients might
supplement their access to data by subscribing to the Private Labeled
Products, it is unlikely that data recipients or distributors will
replace the consolidated feeds provided by the SIPs and/or their direct
access to BATS data feeds as a result of the availability of the
Private Labeled Products. The Exchange represents that it will not
distribute information to IDC for inclusion in the Private Labeled
Products on a more timely basis than it makes available the data to all
Exchange participants that receive such data feeds or that is provided
to the SIPs for consolidation and dissemination, nor will IDC have any
special or different access to the Exchange's data as a result of IDC's
arrangement with the Exchange. In addition, the Exchange represents
that IDC has not (and will not) receive any preferential treatment as a
result of IDC's arrangement with the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Exchange currently offers various data feeds, including,
but not limited to, TCP PITCH and Multicast PITCH, which are depth
of book data feeds containing real-time quotation and transaction
data from the Exchange; DROP, which contains order execution and
other information (e.g., modifications and cancellations) specific
to the Exchange activity of one or more Exchange participants; and
TOP, which contains real-time top of book quotation and transaction
information from the Exchange. Beginning July 1, 2013, the Exchange
implemented fees for the PITCH (including both TCP PITCH and
Multicast PITCH) and TOP data products, and revised the fee for the
Last Sale Feed data product. The Exchange continues to offer its
other market data products to data recipients free of charge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    All Exchange participants, including IDC, that receive BATS data
directly from the Exchange pay connectivity fees to access such data
through logical and physical ports connected to the Exchange's systems.
Beginning July 1, 2013, the Exchange implemented fees for the PITCH
(including both TCP PITCH and Multicast PITCH) and TOP data products,
and revised the fee for the Last Sale Feed data product. Accordingly
all Exchange participants, including IDC, are charged standard fees for
the receipt, use or redistribution of such data feeds. The Exchange
continues to offer its other market data products to data recipients
free of charge. Under the new agreement with IDC, IDC will continue to
receive any of the various BATS data feeds that it currently subscribes
to on the same terms as other Exchange participants, and will continue
to pay any port fees that it currently pays to the Exchange to receive
such data feeds. Additionally, beginning July 1, 2013, IDC became
subject to data fees payable to the Exchange for such data feeds on the
same terms as all other Exchange participants that receive, use or
redistribute BATS data from the Exchange.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes the
proposed rule will allow Exchange participants to make better-informed
and more efficient trading decisions by making available the Private
Labeled Products. In addition, the Exchange notes that the revenue
sharing program is not exclusive as between the Exchange and IDC. Any
recipient of BATS data feeds is permitted to redistribute such data,
whether through a revenue sharing arrangement with BATS or otherwise,
or provide products and services similar to those being offered by IDC,
provided that such recipient (including IDC) has entered into the
required contractual arrangements with the Exchange.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \9\ Recipients of BATS data feeds, either directly from the
Exchange or from a third-party data vendor, that seek to
redistribute such data, either internally or externally, are
required to execute a BATS Global Markets, Inc. Data Agreement, an
Exchange Data Feed Order Form and System Description, List of
Affiliates (if applicable), and Service Facilitator List (if
applicable).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Lastly, these products are completely optional in that no consumer
is required to purchase any of them and only those consumers that deem
such products to be of sufficient overall value and usefulness will
purchase them. To the extent consumers do purchase the Private Labeled
Products, the revenue generated will offset the Exchange's fixed costs
of operating and regulating its trading platforms, including the
continued operation of data feeds that will supply data to be used in
the Private Labeled Products. It will also help the Exchange cover its
costs in developing and running that platform, as well as ongoing
infrastructure costs.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
As discussed above, similar market data products are offered by IDC
containing data from other exchanges and market centers. Further, the
revenue sharing program is not exclusive as between the Exchange and
IDC. Any recipient of BATS data feeds is permitted to redistribute such
data, whether through a revenue sharing arrangement with BATS or
otherwise, or provide products and services similar to those being
offered by IDC, provided that such recipient (including IDC) has
entered into the required contractual arrangements with the Exchange.
The Exchange represents that it will not distribute information to IDC
for inclusion in the Private Labeled

Products on a more timely basis than it makes available the data to all
Exchange participants that receive such data feeds or that is provided
to the SIPs for consolidation and dissemination, nor will IDC have any
special or different access to the Exchange's data as a result of IDC's
arrangement with the Exchange. In addition, the Exchange represents
that IDC has not (and will not) receive any preferential treatment as a
result of IDC's arrangement with the Exchange.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \10\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). Pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),
the Exchange is required to provide the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Commission has determined to waive the requirement that BATS provide
the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the filing
date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \12\ normally
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing.
However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\13\ the Commission may
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has
requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposed rule change may become operative upon filing. The Exchange
believe that such a waiver would allow it to immediately offer the
Private Labeled Products to market participants enabling them to make
better-informed and more efficient trading decisions. In addition, the
Exchange notes that the Private Labeled Products are optional and can
be used by a wide variety of market participants for a wide variety of
purposes. For these reasons, the Commission designates the proposed
rule change to be operative upon filing.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \13\ Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \14\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BATS-2013-045 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2013-045. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2013-045, and should be
submitted on or before September 24, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-21295 Filed 8-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 146 (Tuesday, August 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50135-50136]
[FR Doc No: 2023-16237]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP15-490-004]

Delfin LNG LLC; Notice of Request for Extension of Time

    Take notice that on July 21, 2023, Delfin LNG LLC (Delfin)
requested that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission)
grant an extension of time (2023 Extension of Time Request), until
September 28, 2027, to construct and place into service the facilities
that were authorized in the original certificate authorization issued
on September 28, 2017 (Certificate Order).\1\ The Certificate Order
authorized certain ``onshore facilities'' that would be used
exclusively to transport natural gas to Delfin's deepwater port
``offshore facilities'' (collectively, the Project) in federal waters
offshore Louisiana. The onshore facilities would be used to meet the
requirements of the customers of the offshore facilities. The
Commission subsequently has granted four, successive one-year
extensions of this in-service timing condition, with the result that
the facilities currently are required to be made available for service
by September 28, 2023.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Delfin LNG LLC, 160 FERC ] 61,130 (2017).
    \2\ Delfin LNG LLC, Docket No. CP15-490-000 (July 8, 2019)
(delegated order) (July 2019 Extension Order)., Delfin LNG LLC,
Docket No. CP15-490-000 (July 15, 2020) (delegated order) (July 2020
Extension Order)., Delfin LNG LLC, Docket No. CP15-490-000 (June 30,
2021) (delegated order) (July 21 Extension Order) (July 22 Extension
Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its 2023 Extension of Time Request, Delfin states that it has
made significant progress in developing the Project. Delfin states that
the Project remains commercially viable with a binding LNG sale and
purchase agreement with Vitol Spa for 0.5 million metric tonnes per
annum (mtpa) of LNG delivered free on-board at the Delfin LNG deepwater
port, for 15 years. Second, Delphin in April 2023, entered into a
binding SPA with an affiliate of Hartree Partners, another leading
trading firm, for a 20 year term to supply 0.6 MTPA of LNG. Third, on
July 11, 2023, Delfin and Centrica the parent company of British Gas,
Scottish Gas, and Bord Gais entered a binding agreement for a SPA of1.0
mtpa of LNG for a 15 year term. Fourth, Delfin expects to execute a
binding agreement in late 2023 for 1.0 mtpa to Devon Energy
Corporation. Lastly, Delfin states that the four LNG agreements will
provide revenue of about 18 billion over the contracted terms.
    Delfin explains that since it's July 2022 extension order, it has
modular project consisting of 4 separates Floating LNG vessels (FLNGV)
and only requires 2.0 to 2.5 mtpa of LNG for the long-term off-take
contracts to support a final investment (FID) and begin construction of
the first FLNGV. Moreover, Delfin affirms that FID for the first FLNGV
is on schedule for the end of the year. Additionally, Delfin states it
is in agreement with major infrastructure investors to provide the
needed equity for its first two FLNGVs and has begun discussions with a
consortium of banks to provide the project debt financing. Accordingly,
Delfin requests an extension of time until September 28, 2027, to
complete construction of the onshore facilities and place them into
service.
    This notice establishes a 15-calendar day intervention and comment
period deadline. Any person wishing to comment on Delfin's request for
an extension of time may do so. No reply comments or answers will be
considered. If you wish to obtain legal status by becoming a party to
the proceedings for this request, you should, on or before the comment
date stated below, file a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of

the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10).
    As a matter of practice, the Commission itself generally acts on
requests for extensions of time to complete construction for Natural
Gas Act facilities when such requests are contested before order
issuance. For those extension requests that are contested,\3\ the
Commission will aim to issue an order acting on the request within 45
days.\4\ The Commission will address all arguments relating to whether
the applicant has demonstrated there is good cause to grant the
extension.\5\ The Commission will not consider arguments that re-
litigate the issuance of the certificate order, including whether the
Commission properly found the project to be in the public convenience
and necessity and whether the Commission's environmental analysis for
the certificate complied with the National Environmental Policy Act.\6\
At the time a pipeline requests an extension of time, orders on
certificates of public convenience and necessity are final and the
Commission will not re-litigate their issuance.\7\ The OEP Director, or
his or her designee, will act on all of those extension requests that
are uncontested.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Contested proceedings are those where an intervenor disputes
any material issue of the filing. 18 CFR 385.2201(c)(1) (2019).
    \4\ Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC, 170 FERC ] 61,144, at P 40
(2020).
    \5\ Id. at P 40.
    \6\ Similarly, the Commission will not re-litigate the issuance
of an NGA section 3 authorization, including whether a proposed
project is not inconsistent with the public interest and whether the
Commission's environmental analysis for the permit order complied
with NEPA.
    \7\ Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC, 170 FERC ] 61,144, at P 40
(2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, The Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to Commission's Public Reference
Room. For assistance, contact FERC at [email protected] or
call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and three copies of the protest or intervention to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on, August 9, 2023.

    Dated: July 25, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-16237 Filed 7-31-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: April 30, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 83)]
[Notices]
[Page 22889-22890]
[DOCID:fr30ap10-154]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61972; File No. SR-ISE-2010-32]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to Fee Changes

April 23, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 14, 2010, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the
``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to amend its Schedule of Fees. The text
of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site
(http://www.ise.com), at the principal office of the Exchange, on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and at the Commission's
Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    In SR-ISE-2009-26, the Exchange adopted the term `Singly Listed
ETFs' to identify those ETF products that are listed only on ISE and
for which the Exchange charges a fee of $0.18 per contract for customer
transactions. Currently, the First Trust ISE Water ETF (``FIW''), the
Claymore China Technology ETF (``CQQQ''), the ProShares UltraPro Short
Dow30 (``SDOW''), the ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (``UDOW''), the
ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 (``SMDD''), the ProShares UltraPro
MidCap400 (``UMDD''), the ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000
(``SRTY'') and the ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (``URTY'') are the
only such ETFs listed on the Exchange's fee schedule. On April 14,
2010, ISE began listing options on the First Trust ISE Global Copper
Index Fund (``CU'') and the First Trust ISE Global Platinum Index Fund
(``PLTM''). As of the date of this filing, CU and PLTM are both singly
listed on ISE. The Exchange therefore proposes to charge a fee of $0.18
per contract for customer transactions in options on CU and PLTM. The
Exchange also proposes to charge a Payment for Order Flow fee for
transactions in options on these products.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\3\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\4\ in particular, in that
it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and

other charges among its members and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3) of the Act \5\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \6\ thereunder. At any
time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \6\ 17 CFR 19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an E-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-ISE-2010-32 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2010-32. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2010-32 and should be
submitted by May 21, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-10080 Filed 4-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P