[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 245 (Monday, December 21, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 83096-83097]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28054]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-0417]

Request for Nominations of Voting Members on a Public Advisory
Committee; National Mammography Quality Assurance Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting
nominations for voting members to serve on the National Mammography
Quality Assurance Advisory Committee in the Center for Devices and
Radiological Health. Nominations will be accepted for upcoming
vacancies effective February 1, 2021, with this notice. FDA seeks to
include the views of women and men, members of all racial and ethnic
groups, and individuals with and without disabilities on its advisory
committees and, therefore, encourages nominations of appropriately
qualified candidates from these groups.

DATES: Nominations received on or before February 19, 2021, will be
given first consideration for membership on the National Mammography
Quality Assurance Advisory Committee. Nominations received after
February 19, 2021, will be considered for nomination to the committee
as later vacancies occur.

ADDRESSES: All nominations for membership should be submitted
electronically by logging into the FDA Advisory Nomination Portal at
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/FACTRSPortal/FACTRS/index.cfm or
by mail to Advisory Committee Oversight and Management Staff, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 5103,
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Information about becoming a member on an
FDA advisory committee can also be obtained by visiting FDA's website
at https://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regarding all nomination questions for
membership: Aden Asefa, Center for Devices and Radiological Health,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm.
5214, Silver Spring, MD 20993,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is requesting nominations for voting
members to fill upcoming vacancies on the National Mammography Quality
Assurance Advisory Committee.

I. General Description of the Committee Duties

    The National Mammography Quality Assurance Advisory Committee
advises the Commissioner of Food and Drugs (the Commissioner) or
designee on: (1) Developing appropriate quality standards and
regulations for mammography facilities; (2) developing appropriate
standards and regulations for bodies accrediting mammography facilities
under this program; (3) developing regulations with respect to
sanctions; (4) developing procedures for monitoring compliance with
standards; (5) establishing a mechanism to investigate consumer
complaints; (6) reporting new developments concerning breast imaging
that should be considered in the oversight of mammography facilities;
(7) determining whether there exists a shortage of mammography
facilities in rural and health professional shortage areas and
determining the effects of personnel on access to the services of such
facilities in such areas; (8) determining whether there will exist a
sufficient number of medical physicists after October 1, 1999; and (9)
determining the costs and benefits of compliance with these
requirements.

II. Criteria for Voting Members

    The committee consists of a core of 15 members, including the
Chair. Members and the Chair are selected by the Commissioner or
designee from among physicians, practitioners, and other health
professionals, whose clinical practice, research specialization, or
professional expertise includes a significant focus on mammography.
Almost all non-Federal members of this committee serve as Special
Government Employees. Members will be invited to serve for terms of up
to 4 years.

III. Nomination Procedures

    Any interested person may nominate one or more qualified persons
for membership on the advisory committee. Self-nominations are also
accepted. Nominations must include a current, complete
r[eacute]sum[eacute] or curriculum vitae for each nominee, including
current business address, telephone number, and email address if
available, and a signed copy of the Acknowledgement and Consent form
available at the FDA Advisory Nomination Portal (see ADDRESSES).
Nominations must specify the advisory committee for which the nominee
is recommended. Nominations must also acknowledge that the

nominee is aware of the nomination unless self-nominated. FDA will ask
potential candidates to provide detailed information concerning such
matters related to financial holdings, employment, and research grants
and/or contracts to permit evaluation of possible sources of conflict
of interest.
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14, relating to advisory committees.

    Dated: December 14, 2020.
Lauren K. Roth,
Acting Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-28054 Filed 12-18-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: December 17, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 241)]
[Notices]
[Page 67003-67004]
[DOCID:fr17de09-86]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61141; File No. SR-Phlx-2009-101]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Collection of Exchange Fees

December 10, 2009.

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on December 8, 2009, NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. (``Phlx'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 909, Security for
Exchange Fees and Other Claims, to require member organizations to
provide a clearing account number at the National Securities Clearing
Corporation (``NSCC'') for purposes of permitting the Exchange to debit
any undisputed or final fees, fines, charges and/or other monetary
sanctions or monies due and owing to the Exchange.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQOMXPHLX/
Filings/, on the Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to create an efficient
method of collecting undisputed or final fees, fines, charges and/or
other monetary sanctions or monies due and owing to the Exchange.\3\
This proposal will provide a cost savings to the Exchange in that it
will alleviate administrative processes related to the collection of
monies owed to the Exchange. Collection matters divert staff resources
away from the Exchange's regulatory and business purposes. In addition,
the debiting process will prevent member accounts from becoming
overdue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange will not debit accounts for fees that are
unusually large or for special circumstances, unless such debiting
is requested by the member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to eliminate the requirement to provide and
maintain a security deposit. Currently, Rule 909 requires member
organizations and applicants for registration to provide and maintain a
security deposit in an amount not to exceed $50,000, unless the member
organization maintains excess net capital of at least the amount
established by the Exchange in which case a deposit is not required.
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 909 to eliminate all references to
the security deposit and the excess net capital requirements. The
security deposit was meant to require adequate financial security for
the debts of member corporations and for ensuring that member
corporations are generally financially solvent. The Exchange would
instead propose to require member organizations and applicants to
provide a clearing account number for an account at NSCC in order to
permit the Exchange to debit undisputed or final fees, fines, charges
and/or other monetary sanctions or monies due and owing to the Exchange
or other charges related to Rule 924.\4\ The Exchange will send a
monthly invoice \5\ to each member organization on approximately the
4th-6th business day of the following month.\6\ The Exchange will also
send a file to NSCC each month on approximately the 23rd of the
following month to initiate the debit of the appropriate amount stated
on the member's invoice for the prior month. Because the members will
receive an invoice well before any monies are debited (normally within
two weeks), the members will have adequate time to contact the staff
with any questions concerning their invoice. If a member disputes an
invoice, the Exchange will not include the disputed amount in the debit
if the member has disputed the amount in writing to the Exchange's
designated staff by the 15th of the month, or the following business
day if the 15th is not a business day, and the amount in dispute is at
least $10,000 or greater.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Exchange Rule 924 entitled, Obligations of Members and
Member Organizations to the Exchange, states, among other things,
that members and member organizations shall be liable for such fees,
fines, dues, penalties and other amounts imposed by the Exchange.
    \5\ The monthly invoice will indicate that the amount on the
invoice will be debited from the designated NSCC account. Each
month, the Exchange will send a file to the member's clearing firm
which will indicate the amounts to be debited from each member. If a
member is ``self-clearing'', no such file would be sent as the
member would receive the invoice, as noted above, which would
indicate the amount to be debited.
    \6\ By way of example, October invoices were sent on November
5th.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Once NSCC receives the file from the Exchange, NSCC would proceed
to debit the amounts indicated from the clearing members' account. In
the instance where the member clears through an Exchange clearing
member, the estimated transactions fees owed to the Exchange are
typically debited by the clearing member on a daily basis using daily
transaction detail reports provided by the Exchange to the clearing
member\7\ in order to ensure adequate funds have been escrowed. The
Exchange would debit any monies owed including undisputed or final
fees\8\, fines, charges and/or other monetary sanctions or monies due
and owing to the Exchange.\9\ The Exchange believes

that the debit process eliminates the need to require a security
deposit since the Exchange would debit member accounts at NSCC on a
given day of each month and such debiting would eliminate the risk of
unpaid invoices because of the large amounts of capital held at NSCC by
members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Exchange provides a Daily Transaction Detail Report to
Clearing Members on a daily basis.
    \8\ Exchange fees are noted on the Exchange Fee Schedule.
    \9\ This includes, among other things, fines which result from:
violation of Rule 60, Order and Decorum; violations of the Minor
Rule Plan pursuant to Rule 970; monetary sanctions imposed by the
Business Conduct Committee relating to a Letter of Caution; and
monetary sanctions imposed by a Hearing Panel in connection with
Disciplinary Violations. With respect to disciplinary sanctions that
are imposed by either the Business Conduct Committee or a Hearing
Panel, the Exchange would not debit any monies until such action is
final. The Exchange would not consider an action final until all
appeal periods have run and/or all appeal timeframes are exhausted.
With respect to non-disciplinary actions, the Exchange would
similarly not take action to debit a member account until all appeal
periods have run and/or all appeal timeframes are exhausted. Any
uncontested disciplinary or non-disciplinary actions will be
debited, and the amount due will appear on the members invoice prior
to the actual NSCC debit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the Exchange proposes amending the title of Rule 909
from ``Security for Exchange Fees and Other Claims'' to ``Collection of
Exchange Fees and Other Claims'' in order to more accurately describe
the proposed rule. The Exchange would provide members with a thirty day
period, upon approval of this proposal, to provide the Membership
Department with an NSCC number, if they have not already provided such
a number in the past.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Currently, there are members who have provided the Exchange
with an NSCC clearing account number, which accounts are already
debited on a monthly basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \11\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act\12\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest,
by providing its members with an alternative to providing a security
deposit to the Exchange while also providing members with an efficient
process to pay undisputed or final fees, fines, charges and/or other
monetary sanctions or monies due and owing to the Exchange. The
Exchange believes that this process of debiting NSCC accounts will ease
the member's administrative burden in paying monthly invoices, avoid
overdue balances and provide same day collection from all members, who
owe monies to the Exchange, which results in equitable treatment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) By order approve
such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2009-101 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2009-101. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official business
days between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
Phlx-2009-101 and should be submitted on or before January 7, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-29969 Filed 12-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 201 (Thursday, October 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72082-72083]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23064]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2023-N-4414]

American Regent, Inc., et al.; Withdrawal of Approval of Eight
Abbreviated New Drug Applications

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) is
withdrawing approval of eight abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs)
from multiple applicants. The applicants notified the Agency in writing
that the drug products were no longer marketed and requested that the
approval of the applications be withdrawn.

DATES: Approval is withdrawn as of November 20, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Nguyen, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 75, Rm. 1676, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-6980, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The applicants listed in the table have
informed FDA that these drug products are no longer marketed and have
requested that FDA withdraw approval of the applications under the
process described in Sec.  314.150(c) (21 CFR 314.150(c)). The
applicants have also, by their requests, waived the opportunity for a
hearing. Withdrawal of approval of an application or abbreviated
application under Sec.  314.150(c) is without prejudice to refiling.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Application No.                 Drug              Applicant
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANDA 040515.....................  Promethazine        American Regent,
                                   Hydrochloride       Inc., 5 Ramsey
                                   Injectable, 25      Rd., Shirley, NY
                                   milligrams (mg)/    11967.
                                   milliliter (mL).
ANDA 080028.....................  Sulfacetamide       Allergan Sales,
                                   Sodium Solution/    LLC, 2525 Dupont
                                   Drops, 10% and      Dr., Irvine, CA
                                   30%.                92612.
ANDA 091300.....................  Riluzole Tablet,    Apotex Corp., U.S.
                                   50 mg.              Agent for Apotex
                                                       Inc., 2400 North
                                                       Commerce Parkway,
                                                       Suite 400,
                                                       Weston, FL 33326.
ANDA 200271.....................  Hydroxyprogesteron  Lachman Consultant
                                   e Caproate          Services, Inc.,
                                   Solution, 1,250     U.S. Agent for
                                   mg/5 mL (250 mg/    Aspen Global
                                   mL).                Inc., 1600
                                                       Stewart Ave.,
                                                       Suite 604,
                                                       Westbury, NY
                                                       11590.
ANDA 201570.....................  Abacavir Sulfate    Apotex Corp., U.S.
                                   Tablet,             Agent for Apotex
                                   Equivalent to       Inc.
                                   (EQ) 300 mg base.

ANDA 202784.....................  Esomeprazole        Hetero USA, Inc.,
                                   Magnesium           U.S. Agent for
                                   Capsule, Delayed    Hetero Labs Ltd.,
                                   Release Pellets,    Unit-III, 1035
                                   EQ 20 mg base and   Centennial Ave.,
                                   EQ 40 mg base.      Piscataway, NJ
                                                       08854.
ANDA 208413.....................  Choline C-11        Washington
                                   Injectable, 4-      University School
                                   33.1 millicurie/    of Medicine, 510
                                   mL.                 South
                                                       Kingshighway
                                                       Blvd., St. Louis,
                                                       MO 63110.
ANDA 208939.....................  Esomeprazole        Hetero USA, Inc.,
                                   Magnesium           U.S. Agent for
                                   Capsule, Delayed    Hetero Labs Ltd.
                                   Release, EQ 20 mg
                                   base.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, approval of the applications listed in the table, and
all amendments and supplements thereto, is hereby withdrawn as of
November 20, 2023. Approval of each entire application is withdrawn,
including any strengths and dosage forms inadvertently missing from the
table. Introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of products listed in the table without an approved new drug
application or abbreviated new drug application violates sections
505(a) and 301(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21
U.S.C. 355(a) and 331(d)). Drug products that are listed in the table
that are in inventory on November 20, 2023 may continue to be dispensed
until the inventories have been depleted or the drug products have
reached their expiration dates or otherwise become violative, whichever
occurs first.

    Dated: October 13, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-23064 Filed 10-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 26, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59095-59100]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23570]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2012-0081; FRL-9728-2]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Mississippi:
New Source Review-Prevention of Significant Deterioration; Fine
Particulate Matter (PM2.5)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to approve changes to the
Mississippi State Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted by the
Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Division of Air
Pollution Control to EPA on May 12, 2011. The May 12, 2011, SIP
revision modifies Mississippi's New Source Review (NSR) Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting regulations to incorporate
by reference, into the Mississippi SIP, federal NSR PSD requirements
for the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS) as promulgated in EPA's 2008 NSR
PM2.5 Implementation Rule and the 2010 PM2.5 PSD
Increment, Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and Significant Monitoring
Concentration (SMC) Rule. EPA is approving portions of Mississippi's
May 12, 2011, SIP revision because they are consistent with the Clean
Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA regulations regarding NSR permitting.

DATES: Effective Date: This rule will be effective October 26, 2012.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2012-0081. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential
Business Information or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information regarding the
Mississippi SIP, contact Ms. Twunjala Bradley, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Ms. Bradley's telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For
information regarding NSR, contact Ms.

Yolanda Adams, Air Permits Section, at the same address above. Ms.
Adams' telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For information regarding the PM2.5
NAAQS, contact Mr. Joel Huey, Regulatory Development Section, at the
same address above. Mr. Huey's telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. This Action
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    EPA is taking final action on portions of Mississippi's May 12,
2011, SIP revision to incorporate by reference (IBR) \1\ federal
requirements for NSR permitting. Mississippi's May 12, 2011, SIP
revision includes changes to its air quality regulations in Air
Pollution Control, Section 5 (APC-S-5)--Regulations for the Prevention
of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality. The May 12, 2011, changes
IBR federal PSD permitting regulations promulgated in the final
rulemakings entitled ``Implementation of the New Source Review (NSR)
Program for Particulate Matter Less than 2.5 Micrometers
(PM2.5),'' 73 FR 28321 (May 16, 2008), hereafter referred to
as the ``NSR PM2.5 Rule,'' and ``Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers
(PM2.5)--Increments, Significant Impact Levels SILs and
Significant Monitoring Concentration (SMC),'' 75 FR 64864 (October 20,
2010) hereafter referred to as the ``PM2.5 PSD Increment-
SILs-SMC Rule''). Additionally, Mississippi's SIP revision requests
that EPA remove from the SIP the exclusion language at APC-S-5 (2.7)
regarding the NSR PM2.5 Rule provisions. EPA is not
approving in this action: (1) incorporation of the SIL thresholds and
provisions promulgated in EPA's PM2.5 PSD Increment-SILs-SMC
Rule, 75 FR 64864 (October 20, 2010); and (2) incorporation of the
provision regarding the applicability of the term ``particulate matter
emissions'' when accounting for condensable particles in applicability
determinations and in establishing emissions limitations in PSD
permits.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Throughout this document IBR means incorporate or
incorporates by reference.
    \2\ Today's final action approves the incorporation by reference
of 40 CFR 52.21 into the Mississippi SIP as of March 22, 2011 apart
from the exclusions stated in this final rulemaking and at 40 CFR
52.1270(c). Any previous EPA exclusions to APS-S-5 at 40 CFR
52.1270(c) remain in effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On July 23, 2012, EPA published a proposed rulemaking to approve
the aforementioned changes to Mississippi's NSR PSD program at APC-S-5.
See 77 FR 43032. Comments on the proposed rulemaking were due on or
before August 22, 2012. No comments, adverse or otherwise, were
received on EPA's July 23, 2012, proposed rulemaking. Pursuant to
section 110 of the CAA, EPA is now taking final action to approve the
changes to Mississippi's NSR PSD program as provided in EPA's July 23,
2012, proposed rulemaking. A summary of the background for today's
final action is provided below. EPA's July 23, 2012, proposed
rulemaking contains more detailed information regarding the Mississippi
SIP revision being approved today, and the rationale for today's final
action. Detailed information regarding the PM2.5 NAAQS and
NSR Program can also be found in EPA's July 23, 2012, proposed
rulemaking as well as the abovementioned final rulemakings.

A. NSR PM2.5 Rule

    EPA finalized the NSR PM2.5 Rule on May 16, 2008, which
revised the NSR program requirements to establish the framework for
implementing preconstruction permit review for the PM2.5
NAAQS in both attainment areas and nonattainment areas (NAAs) that: (1)
Require NSR permits to address directly emitted PM2.5 and
precursor pollutants; (2) establish significant emission rates for
direct PM2.5 and precursor pollutants (including sulfur
dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx)); (3) establish
PM2.5 emission offsets; (4) provide exceptions to the
grandfathering policy for permits being reviewed under the
PM10 surrogate program; and (5) require states to account
for gases that condense to form particles (condensables) in
PM2.5 and PM10 emission limits in PSD or
nonattainment NSR (NNSR) permits. Additionally, the NSR
PM2.5 Rule authorized states to adopt provisions in their
NNSR rules that would allow interpollutant offset trading. See 73 FR
28321. States were required to provide SIP submissions to address the
requirements for the NSR PM2.5 Rule by May 16, 2011.
Mississippi's May 12, 2011, SIP revision addresses only the PSD
requirements related to EPA's May 16, 2008, NSR PM2.5
Rule.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Mississippi's May 12, 2011, SIP revision only addresses the
State's PSD permitting program and does not adopt the NNSR
permitting requirements for PM2.5 emission offsets,
condensable provision or the discretionary interpollutant trading
policy and ratios promulgated in the 2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule.
Moreover, Mississippi is attainment for the 1997 annual and 2006 24-
hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. PM10 Surrogate and Grandfathering Policy
    In the NSR PM2.5 Rule, EPA required that major
stationary sources seeking permits must begin directly satisfying the
PM2.5 requirements, as of the effective date of the rule,
rather than relying on PM10 as a surrogate, with two
exceptions.\4\ The first exception is a ``grandfathering'' provision in
the federal PSD program at 40 CFR 52.21(i)(1)(xi). This grandfathering
provision applied to sources that had applied for, but had not yet
received, a final and effective PSD permit before the July 15, 2008,
effective date of the May 2008 final rule. The second exception was
that states with SIP-approved PSD programs could continue to implement
the Seitz Memo's PM10 Surrogate Policy for up to three years
(until May 2011) or until the individual revised state PSD programs for
PM2.5 are approved by EPA, whichever comes first. On May 18,
2011 (76 FR 28646), EPA took final action to repeal the grandfathering
provision at 40 CFR 52.21(i)(1)(xi). This final action ended the use of
the 1997 PM10 Surrogate Policy for PSD permits under the
federal PSD program at 40 CFR 52.21. In effect, any PSD permit
applicant previously covered by the grandfathering provision (for
sources that completed and submitted a permit application before July
15, 2008) \5\ that did not have a final and effective PSD permit before
the effective date of the repeal will not be able to rely on the 1997
p.m.10 Surrogate Policy to satisfy the PSD requirements for
PM2.5 unless the application includes a valid surrogacy
demonstration.\6\ See 76 FR

28646. In its May 12, 2011, SIP revision, Mississippi did not adopt the
grandfathering provision at 40 CFR 52.21(i)(1)(xi) into its PSD
regulations. Therefore, Mississippi's SIP is consistent with current
federal regulations regarding the repeal of the grandfathering
provision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ After EPA promulgated the NAAQS for PM2.5 in
1997, the Agency issued guidance documents related to using
PM10 as a surrogate for PM2.5 entitled:
``Interim Implementation of New Source Review Requirements for
PM2.5.'' John S. Seitz, EPA, October 23, 1997 (the
``Seitz Memo'') and ``Implementation of New Source Review
Requirements in PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas'' (the ``2005
PM2.5 NNSR Guidance''). The Seitz Memo was designed to
help states implement NSR requirements pertaining to the new
PM2.5 NAAQS in light of technical difficulties posed by
PM2.5 at that time. The 2005 PM2.5 NNSR
Guidance provided direction regarding implementation of the NNSR
provisions in PM2.5 NAA in the interim period between the
effective date of the PM2.5 NAA designations (April 5,
2005) and EPA's promulgation of final PM2.5 NNSR
regulations (this included recommending that until EPA promulgated
the PM2.5 major NSR regulations, ``States should use a
PM10 nonattainment major NSR program as a surrogate to
address the requirements of nonattainment major NSR for the
PM2.5 NAAQS.'').
    \5\ Sources that applied for a PSD permit under the federal PSD
program on or after July 15, 2008, are already excluded from using
the 1997 PM10 Surrogate Policy as a means of satisfying
the PSD requirements for PM2.5. See 76 FR 28321.
    \6\ Additional information on this issue can also be found in an
August 12, 2009, final order on a title V petition describing the
use of PM10 as a surrogate for PM2.5. In the
Matter of Louisville Gas & Electric Company, Petition No. IV-2008-3,
Order on Petition (August 12, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. ``Condensable'' Provision
    In the NSR PM2.5 Rule, EPA revised the definition of
``regulated NSR pollutant'' for PSD to add a paragraph providing that
``particulate matter (PM) emissions, PM2.5 emissions and
PM10 emissions'' shall include gaseous emissions from a
source or activity which condense to form particulate matter at ambient
temperatures and that on or after January 1, 2011, such condensable
particulate matter shall be accounted for in applicability
determinations and in establishing emissions limitations for PM,
PM2.5 and PM10 in permits issued. See 40 CFR
51.166(b)(49)(vi), 52.21(b)(50)(vi) and ``Emissions Offset
Interpretative Ruling'' (40 CFR Part 51, Appendix S). On March 16,
2012, EPA proposed a rulemaking to amend the definition of ``regulated
NSR pollutant'' promulgated in the NSR PM2.5 Rule regarding
the PM condensable provision at 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49)(vi),
52.21(b)(50)(i) and EPA's Emissions Offset Interpretative Ruling. See
77 FR 15656. The rulemaking proposes to remove the inadvertent
requirement in the NSR PM2.5 Rule that the measurement of
condensable ``particulate matter emissions'' be included as part of the
measurement and regulation of ``particulate matter emissions.'' \7\
Mississippi's May 12, 2011, SIP revision adopts EPA's definition for
``regulated NSR pollutant'' for condensables (at 40 CFR
51.166(b)(49)(vi)), including the term ``particulate matter
emissions,'' as promulgated in the NSR PM2.5 Rule. On June
26, 2012, the State of Mississippi provided a letter to EPA clarifying
the State's intent in light of EPA's March 12, 2012, proposed
rulemaking and requesting that EPA not approve into the Mississippi SIP
the term ``particulate matter emissions'' (as part of the definition
for ``regulated NSR pollutant'') regarding the inclusion of condensable
emissions in applicability determinations and in establishing emissions
limitations for PM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The term ``particulate matter emissions'' includes particles
that are larger than PM2.5 and PM10 and is an
indicator measured under various New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) at 40 CFR part 60. In addition to the NSPS for PM, it is
noted that states have regulated ``particulate matter emissions''
for many years in their SIPs for PM, and the same indicator has been
used as a surrogate for determining compliance with certain
standards contained in 40 CFR part 63, regarding National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. NOX Insignificance Demonstration
    In addition to direct PM2.5 emissions, pollutants that
can contribute to ambient PM2.5 concentrations (known as
``precursors'') include SO2, NOx, volatile
organic compounds (VOC) and ammonia (all of which undergo chemical
reactions to form secondary PM). In the NSR PM2.5 Rule, EPA
established a ``presumed-in'' approach for NOx as a
PM2.5 precursor. This approach is warranted based on the
well-known transformation of NOx into nitrates, coupled with
the fact that nitrate concentrations vary significantly around the
country. The final NSR PM2.5 Rule requires that states treat
NOx as a PM2.5 precursor in all areas unless the
state demonstrates to the Administrator's satisfaction or EPA
demonstrates that emissions of NOx from sources in a
specific area are not a significant contributor to that area's ambient
PM2.5 concentrations.\8\ See 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49)(i),
51.165(a)(1)(xxxvii) and 52.21(b)(50)(i). If EPA makes such a
demonstration, or a state makes such a demonstration and it is approved
by EPA, NOx would not be considered a PM2.5
precursor under the NSR program in that area. If a State or EPA does
not make such a demonstration, NOx must be regulated as a
precursor under the PSD, NNSR, and minor source programs for
PM2.5. Mississippi's May 12, 2011, SIP revision IBR the
provision that NOx is presumed to be a precursor for
PM2.5. However, MDEQ also submitted to EPA a NOx
insignificance demonstration to show that NOx emissions in
the State of Mississippi are not contributing significantly to ambient
PM2.5 concentrations in the State. At this time, EPA is
still considering Mississippi's NOx insignificance
demonstration and will take action on this portion of MDEQ's May 12,
2011, SIP revision in a separate rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The NSR PM2.5 Rule presumes that VOC and ammonia
are not precursors to PM2.5 unless a state or EPA
demonstrates that these pollutants are significantly contributing to
the ambient PM2.5 concentrations in a specific area. The
rule requires that SO2 be treated as a precursor to
PM2.5 in all areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. PM2.5 PSD Increment SILs-SMC Rule

    The PM2.5 PSD Increment-SILs-SMC Rule provided
additional regulatory requirements under the PSD program regarding the
implementation of the PM2.5 NAAQS for NSR, including (1)
PM2.5 increments pursuant to section 166(a) of the CAA to
prevent significant deterioration of air quality in areas meeting the
NAAQS; (2) SILs used as a screening tool (by a major source subject to
PSD) to evaluate the impact a proposed major source or modification may
have on the NAAQS or PSD increment; and (3) a SMC, (also a screening
tool) used by a major source subject to PSD to determine the subsequent
level of data gathering required for a PSD permit application for
emissions of PM2.5. The SILs and SMC are numerical values
that represent thresholds of insignificant, i.e., de minimis,\9\
modeled source impacts or monitored (ambient) concentrations,
respectively. EPA established such values to be used as screening tools
by a major source subject to PSD to determine the subsequent level of
PM2.5 analysis and data gathering required for a PSD permit
application. EPA's authority to implement the SILs and SMC for PSD
purposes has been challenged by the Sierra Club. Sierra Club v. EPA,
Case No 10-1413 (DC Circuit Court).\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The de minimis principle is grounded in a decision described
by the court case Alabama Power Co. v. Costle, 636 F.2d 323, 360 (DC
Cir. 1980). In this case, reviewing EPA's 1978 PSD regulations, the
court recognized that ``there is likely a basis for an implication
of de minimis authority to provide exemption when the burdens of
regulation yield a gain of trivial or no value.'' 636 F.2d at 360.
See 75 FR 64864.
    \10\ On April 6, 2012, EPA filed a brief with the DC Circuit
court defending the Agency's authority to implement SILs and SMC for
PSD purposes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. PSD Increments
    PSD increments prevent air quality in clean areas from
deteriorating to the level set by the NAAQS. Therefore, an increment is
the mechanism used to estimate ``significant deterioration'' \11\ of
air quality for a pollutant in an area. Under section 165(a)(3) of the
CAA, a PSD permit applicant must demonstrate that emissions from the
proposed construction and operation of a facility ``will not cause, or
contribute to, air pollution in excess of any maximum allowable
increase or allowable concentration for any pollutant.'' When a source
applies for a permit to emit a regulated pollutant in an area that
meets the NAAQS, the state and EPA must determine if emissions of the
regulated pollutant from the source will cause

significant deterioration in air quality. As described in the
PM2.5 PSD Increment-SILs-SMC Rule, pursuant to the authority
under section 166(a) of the CAA, EPA promulgated numerical PSD
increments for PM2.5 as a new pollutant \12\ for which NAAQS
were established after August 7, 1977,\13\ and derived 24-hour and
annual PM2.5 increments for the three area classifications
(Class I, II and III) using the ``contingent safe harbor'' approach.
See 75 FR 64869 and ambient air increment tables at 40 CFR 51.166(c)(1)
and 52.21(c). In addition to PSD increments for the PM2.5
NAAQS, the PM2.5 PSD Increment-SILs-SMC Rule amended the
definition at 40 CFR 51.166 and 52.21 for ``major source baseline
date'' and ''minor source baseline date'' (including trigger date) to
establish the PM2.5 NAAQS specific dates associated with the
implementation of PM2.5 PSD increments. See 75 FR 64864.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Significant deterioration occurs when the amount of the new
pollution exceeds the applicable PSD increment, which is the
``maximum allowable increase'' of an air pollutant allowed to occur
above the applicable baseline concentration \11\ for that pollutant.
Section 169(4) of the CAA provides that the baseline concentration
of a pollutant for a particular baseline area is generally the air
quality at the time of the first application for a PSD permit in the
area.
    \12\ EPA generally characterized the PM2.5 NAAQS as a
NAAQS for a new indicator of PM. EPA did not replace the
PM10 NAAQS with the NAAQS for PM2.5 when the
PM2.5 NAAQS were promulgated in 1997. EPA rather retained
the annual and 24-hour NAAQS for PM2.5 as if
PM2.5 was a new pollutant even though EPA had already
developed air quality criteria for PM generally. See 75 FR 64864
(October 20, 2012).
    \13\ EPA interprets 166(a) to authorize EPA to promulgate
pollutant-specific PSD regulations meeting the requirements of
section 166(c) and 166(d) for any pollutant for which EPA
promulgates a NAAQS after 1977.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Significant Monitoring Concentrations
    As mentioned above, the SMC numerical value represents a threshold
of insignificant (i.e., de minimis) monitored ambient impacts on
pollutant concentrations. In the PM2.5 PSD Increment-SILs-
SMC Rule, EPA established a PM2.5 SMC of 4 [micro]g/m\3\ to
be used as a screening tool by a major source subject to PSD to
determine the subsequent level of PM2.5 data gathering
required for a PSD permit application. Using the SMC as a screening
tool, sources may be able to demonstrate that the modeled air quality
impact of emissions from the new source or modification, or the
existing air quality level in the area where the source would
construct, is less than the SMC (i.e., de minimis), and as such, may be
allowed to forego the preconstruction monitoring requirement for a
particular pollutant at the discretion of the reviewing authority.
    Recently, the Sierra Club filed suit challenging EPA's authority to
implement the PM2.5 SILs \14\ as well as the SMC for PSD
purposes as promulgated in the October 20, 2012, rule. Sierra Club v.
EPA, Case No. 10-1413, DC Circuit Court. Specifically, regarding the
SMC, Sierra Club claims that the use of SMCs to exempt a source from
submitting a year's worth of monitoring data is inconsistent with the
CAA. EPA responded to Sierra Club's claims in a Brief dated April 6,
2012, which describes the Agency's authority to develop and promulgate
SMC.\15\ A copy of EPA's April 6, 2010, Brief can be found in the
docket for today's final rulemaking at www.regulations.gov using docket
ID: EPA-R04-OAR-2012-0081.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ As mentioned earlier, due to litigation by the Sierra Club,
EPA is not taking final action on the SILs portion of the
Mississippi May 12, 2011, SIP revision at this time but will take
action once the court case regarding SILs implementation is
resolved.
    \15\ Additional information on this issue can also be found in
an April 25, 2010, comment letter from EPA Region 6 to the Louisiana
Department of Environmental Quality regarding the SILs-SMC
litigation. A copy of this letter can be found in the docket for
today's rulemaking at www.regulations.gov using docket ID: EPA-R04-
OAR-2012-0081.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. This Action

    EPA is taking final action to approve into the Mississippi SIP
portions of the State's May 12, 2011, SIP revision, which IBR the PSD
permitting regulations to implement the PM2.5 NAAQS.
Mississippi's regulation APC-S-5 IBR the federal NSR PSD regulations at
40 CFR 51.166 and 52.21 into the Mississippi SIP. In effect, MDEQ's May
12, 2011, SIP revision updates the State's IBR date for APC-S-5 to
March 22, 2011, to include PSD permitting regulations promulgated in
the NSR PM2.5 Rule and the PM2.5 PSD Increment-
SILs-SMC Rule in the Mississippi SIP. These changes to Mississippi's
regulation APC-S-5 became state effective on June 2, 2011. MDEQ's SIP
revision IBR the NSR PM2.5 Rule PSD provisions at regulation
APC-S-5, including: (1) The requirement for NSR permits to address
directly emitted PM2.5 and precursor pollutants; (2)
significant emission rates for direct PM2.5 and precursor
pollutants (SO2 and NOX) and establishing
PM2.5 precursors (as amended at 40 CFR 51.166(b)(23)(i)) for
the definition of ``significant'' and ``regulated NSR pollutant,''
respectively; and (3) PSD requirement for states to address condensable
PM in establishing enforceable emission limits for PM10 and
PM2.5 (as amended at definition of ``regulated NSR pollutant
``at 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49)).
    Regarding the condensable provision, in light of Mississippi's
request in its June 26, 2012, letter and EPA's intention to amend the
definition of ``regulated NSR pollutant'' as discussed in the March 12,
2012, correction rulemaking, EPA is not taking final action to approve
the terminology ``particulate matter emissions'' into the Mississippi
SIP (at APC-S-5) for the condensable provision in the definition of
``regulated NSR pollutant.'' See 77 FR 15656. EPA is, however, taking
final action to approve into the Mississippi SIP the remaining
condensable requirement at 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49)(vi), which requires
that condensable emissions be accounted for in applicability
determinations and in establishing emissions limitations for
PM2.5 and PM10. Mississippi's May 12, 2011, SIP
revision did not IBR the grandfathering provision at 40 CFR
52.21(i)(1)(xi) in accordance with the repeal of the PM2.5
grandfathering provision. Rather, the SIP revision includes new
language at APC-S-5(2.7) that excludes the provision for
PM2.5 (at 40 CFR 52.21(i)(1)(xi)) from the PSD program
regulations.
    As stated in Mississippi's May 12, 2011, SIP revision,
NOX will be considered a precursor to PM2.5 in
Mississippi until such time as EPA takes action on the State's
NOX insignificance demonstration or upon plan disapproval.
As part of MDEQ's May 12, 2011, revision to IBR the federal regulations
at 40 CFR 51.166 and 52.21, EPA is taking final action, at this time,
to approve into the Mississippi SIP that NOX is a presumed
PM2.5 precursor. EPA is considering Mississippi's
NOX insignificance demonstration and will take action on
this portion of the May 12, 2011, SIP submission in a separate
rulemaking. Mississippi's May 12, 2011, SIP revision also removes from
APC-S-5(2.7) language that excludes NSR PM2.5 Rule
permitting requirements from inclusion into the Mississippi SIP.\16\
Because MDEQ's May 12, 2011, SIP revision adopts the aforementioned
provisions promulgated in the May 16, 2008, NSR PM2.5 Rule,
the exclusion language is no longer necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ In Mississippi's December 9, 2010, Greenhouse Gas Tailoring
Rule final SIP revision, MDEQ added specific language at APC-S-
5(2.7) excluding from the IBR of 40 CFR 52.21 the PSD NSR
PM2.5 Rule provisions promulgated in the May 16, 2008,
rule and stated they would submit a separate rulemaking to address
those PSD requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to the PM2.5 PSD Increment-SILs SMC Rule,
EPA is taking final action to also approve into the Mississippi SIP the
PSD increments for PM2.5 annual and 24-hour NAAQS pursuant
to section 166(a) of the CAA and SMC of 4 [micro]g/m\3\ for
PM2.5 NAAQS. The May 12, 2011, SIP revision IBR the
PM2.5 increments established in the ambient air increment
tables at 40 CFR 51.166(c)(1) and (p)(4) and 52.21(c); the amendments
to the ``major source

baseline date'' (at 40 CFR 51.166(b)(14)(i)(c)) and
52.21(b)(14)(i)(c)); the ``minor source baseline date'' and
establishment of the ``trigger date'' (40 CFR 51.166(b)(14)(ii)(c) and
52.21(b)(14)(ii)(c)); and the definition of ``baseline area'' (at 40
CFR 51.166(b)(15)(i) and (ii) and 52.21(b)(15)(i) and (ii)).
    Regarding the SILs and SMC, EPA's authority to implement the
PM2.5 SILs and SMC is currently the subject of litigation by
the Sierra Club. In a brief filed in the DC Circuit on April 6, 2012,
EPA described the Agency's authority under the CAA to promulgate and
implement the SMCs and SILs de minimis thresholds. Sierra Club v. EPA,
Case No 10-1413 DC Circuit. However, EPA is finalizing approval of the
promulgated SMC thresholds into the Mississippi SIP because the Agency
believes the SMC is a valid exercise of the Agency's de minimis
authority as well as the fact they are consistent with EPA's
promulgated levels in the PM2.5 PSD Increment-SILs-SMC Rule.
The ongoing litigation may result in the court decision that may
require subsequent rule revisions and SIP revisions from Mississippi.
    In response to the litigation, EPA requested that the court remand
and vacate the new regulatory text at 40 CFR 51.166(k)(2) and
52.21(k)(2) concerning the implementation of SILs for PM2.5
so that EPA can make necessary rulemaking revisions to that text.\17\
In light of EPA's request for remand and vacatur and our
acknowledgement of the need to revise the regulatory text presently
contained at paragraph (k)(2) of sections 51.166 and 52.21, the Agency
has determined at this time not to approve the SILs portion of the
MDEQ's May 12, 2011, SIP revision that contains the affected regulatory
text in Mississippi's PSD regulations at APC-S-5. EPA will take action
on the SILs portion of Mississippi's May 12, 2011, SIP revision in a
separate rulemaking once the issue regarding the court case has been
resolved.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ In the preamble to the October 20, 2010, final rule EPA
indicates that the Agency does not consider the SILs to be a
mandatory SIP element, but regard them as discretionary on the part
of regulating authority for use in the PSD permitting process. See
75 FR 64864 at 64899.
    \18\ EPA is currently developing guidance to provide provisional
course of action to implement the PM2.5 SILs pending
revision to the (k)(2) provisions and the litigation. The guidance
will ensure that the PM2.5 SILs are properly applied as
part of a PSD compliance demonstration to show that a source's
impact will not cause or contribute to a violation of the
PM2.5 NAAQS or increment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Final Action

    EPA is taking final action to approve portions of Mississippi's May
12, 2011, SIP revisions (with the exception of the term ``particulate
matter emissions'' and the SILs threshold and provisions) that IBR
federal regulations amended in the NSR PM2.5 and the
PM2.5 PSD Increment-SILs-SMC Rules to implement the
PM2.5 NAAQS for the NSR program because they are consistent
with section 110 of the CAA and its regulations regarding NSR
permitting.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 26, 2012. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements and Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: September 6, 2012.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart Z--Mississippi

0
2. Section 52.1270(c) is amended by revising entry ``APC-S-5'' to read
as follows:

Sec.  52.1270  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                      EPA-Approved Mississippi Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               State effective    EPA approval
    State citation         Title/subject            date              date                  Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 APC-S-5-Regulations for Prevention of Significant Deterioration for Air Quality
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All..................  .....................         06/2/2011  9-26-12 [Insert   As of 9-26-2012 EPA is
                                                                 citation of       approving a revision to APC-S-
                                                                 publication].     5 incorporating by reference
                                                                                the regulations found at 40
                                                                                CFR 52.21 as of March 22,
                                                                                2011. See [Insert citation of
                                                                                publication]. This approval
                                                                                does not include
                                                                                Mississippi's revision to IBR
                                                                                (at Rule APC-S-5) the term
                                                                                ``particulate matter
                                                                                emissions'' (as promulgated
                                                                                in the May 16, 2008 NSR PM2.5
                                                                                Rule (at 40 CFR
                                                                                51.166(b)(49)(vi)) and the
                                                                                PM2.5 SILs threshold and
                                                                                provisions (as promulgated in
                                                                                the October 20, 2010 PM2.5
                                                                                PSD Increment-SILs-SMC Rule
                                                                                at 40 CFR 52.21(k)(2)).
                                                                                On December 29, 2010, EPA
                                                                                approved a revision to APC-S-
                                                                                5 which incorporated by
                                                                                reference the regulations
                                                                                found at 40 CFR 52.21 as of
                                                                                September 13, 2010. See 75 FR
                                                                                81858. That action approved
                                                                                the incorporation by
                                                                                reference with the exception
                                                                                of the phrase ``except
                                                                                ethanol production facilities
                                                                                producing ethanol by natural
                                                                                fermentation under the North
                                                                                American Industry
                                                                                Classification System (NAICS)
                                                                                codes 325193 or 312140,'' APC-
                                                                                S-5 incorporated by reference
                                                                                from 40 CFR 52.21(b)(1)(i)(a)
                                                                                and (b)(1(iii)(t).
                                                                                Additionally, that final EPA
                                                                                action did not incorporate by
                                                                                reference, into the
                                                                                Mississippi SIP, the
                                                                                administrative regulations
                                                                                that were amended in the
                                                                                Fugitive Emissions Rule (73
                                                                                FR 77882) and are stayed
                                                                                through October 3, 2011.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-23570 Filed 9-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17421-17422]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07243]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14802-000]

Magnolia Water, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments and Motions To Intervene

    On September 23, 2016, Magnolia Water, LLC filed an application for
a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act
(FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of the Magnolia Water Pumped
Storage Hydroelectric Project (project) to be located on Long Creek and
the Kiamichi River in Pushmataha County, Oklahoma. The sole purpose of
a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the permit holder priority
to file a license application during the permit term. A preliminary
permit does not authorize the permit holder to perform any land-
disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands or waters owned by
others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed project would consist of the following: (1) A 1,970-
foot-long, 360-foot-high earthen upper dam across Tombstone Creek; (2)
a 100-foot-long, 3,400-foot-wide rock-lined upper emergency spillway
connecting to the lower reservoir; (3) a 190-acre upper reservoir
having a total storage capacity of 22,800 acre-feet; (4) an intake/
outlet structure in the upper reservoir; (5) four 3,500-foot-long, 22-
foot-diameter steel and reinforced concrete, tunneled penstocks
extending to the powerhouse; (6) a 250-foot-long, 120-foot-wide
powerhouse, containing four pump-turbine generating units, with a total
generating capacity of 1,200 megawatts; (7) four 30-foot-long, 400-
foot-wide tailrace pipes; (8) a 9,800-foot-long, 80-foot-high earthen
lower dam; (9) a 375-acre lower reservoir having a total storage
capacity of 22,500 acre-feet; (10) a 100-foot-long, 3,400-foot-wide
rock-lined lower emergency spillway connecting to a creek flowing into
the Kiamichi River; (11) a 200-foot-long, 5-foot-high concrete overflow
diversion

weir across the Kiamichi River to supply water to the project; (12) a
5-acre impoundment on the Kiamichi River with a storage capacity of 25
acre-feet; (13) a 200-foot-long, 200-foot-wide duplex pump station;
(14) a 10,000-foot-long, 24-inch-diameter steel water supply pipe to
the lower reservoir; (15) a 90-mile-long, 345 kilovolt transmission
line; and (16) two new access roads; one 6,800-foot-long road to access
the lower reservoir site, and one 11,500-foot-long road to access the
upper reservoir site. Both roads would be constructed on private
property to perform studies. The estimated annual generation of the
project would be 3,400 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Fred Brown, Magnolia Water, LLC, 4265
Kellway Circle, Addison, TX 75001; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Navreet Deo; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief
comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the
eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You
must include your name and contact information at the end of your
comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper copy to:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should include
docket number P-14802-000.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-14802) in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: April 5, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-07243 Filed 4-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37901-37902]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15371]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2011-0255; FRL-9517-8]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Flexible Polyurethane
Foam Fabrication (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR which is abstracted

below describes the nature of the collection and the estimated burden
and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before July 25, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2011-0255, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency,
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center, mail code
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB
at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Learia Williams, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On May 9, 2011 (76 FR 26900), EPA sought comments on this ICR
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any additional
comments on this ICR should be submitted to both EPA and OMB within 30
days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OECA-2011-0255, which is available for public viewing
online at http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the
Enforcement and Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The
EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number
for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in
the docket that are available electronically. Once in the system,
select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified
above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public
viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, as EPA receives them and without
change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, Confidential
Business Information (CBI), or other information whose public
disclosure is restricted by statute. For further information about the
electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov.
    Title: NESHAP for Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication (Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2027.05, OMB Control Number 2060-0516.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on July 31, 2012. Under
OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the
collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication are subject to
the General Provisions (40 CFR part 63, subpart A) and any changes, or
additions to the Provisions (40 CFR part 63, subpart MMMMM). Owners or
operators of the affected facilities must submit initial notification,
performance tests, and periodic reports and results. Owners or
operators are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and
duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of
an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system
is inoperative. Reports, at a minimum, are required semiannually.
    All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority. In
the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are
sent directly to the EPA regional office. This information is being
collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart MMMMM, as
authorized in section 112 and 114(a) of the Clean Air Act. The required
information consists of emissions data and other information that have
been determined to be private. An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Numbers for the EPA regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and
48 CFR chapter 15, and are identified on the form and/or instrument, if
applicable.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 90
hours per response. ``Burden'' means the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously- applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operators of flexible
polyurethane foam fabrication.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 14.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, occasionally, annually, and
semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 15,601.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $1,497,553, which includes $1,494,882
in labor costs, $997 in capital/startup costs, and $1,674 in operation
and maintenance (O&M) costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an increase in burden hours for
both the respondents and the Agency in this ICR compared to the
previous ICR. This is because there are, on average, 3 more existing
units subject to this standard due to a growth in the respondent
universe during the past three years.
    There is also an increase in the total labor and Agency costs as
currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved Burdens. The
change in cost estimates reflects an increase in respondent numbers, as
described above, and updated labors rates available from the Bureau of
Labor Statistics.

John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-15371 Filed 6-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 128 (Thursday, July 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38036-38037]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15647]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0801]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Exports: Notification and Recordkeeping Requirements

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, and
to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the notice. This
notice solicits comments on export notification and recordkeeping
requirements for persons exporting human drugs, biological products,
devices, animal drugs, food, cosmetics, and tobacco that may not be
marketed or sold in the United States.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by September 2, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd., COLE-14526, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

Exports: Notification and Recordkeeping Requirements--21 CFR 1.101 (OMB
Control Number 0910-0482)--Extension

    Section 801 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C
Act) (21 U.S.C. 381) charges the Secretary of Health and Human
Services, through FDA, with the responsibility of assuring exports
(Exports: Notification and Recordkeeping Requirements--Sec.  1.101 (21
CFR 1.101)) which pertain to the exportation of unapproved new drugs,
biologics, devices, animal drugs, food, cosmetics, and tobacco products
are not be sold in the United States.
    The respondents to this information collection are exporters who
have notified FDA of their intent to export unapproved products that
may not be sold or markets in the United States as allowed under
section 801(e) of the FD&C Act. In general, the notification identifies
the product being exported (e.g. name, description, and in some cases,
country of destination) and specifies where the notifications were
sent. These notifications are sent only for an initial export.
Subsequent exports of the same product to the same destination or in
the case of certain countries identified in section 802(b) of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 382) would not result in a notification to FDA.
    The recordkeepers to this information collection are exporters who
export human drugs, biologics, devices, animal drugs, foods, cosmetics,
and tobacco products that may not be sold in the United States and
maintain records demonstrating their compliance with the requirements
in section 801(e)(1) of the FD&C Act.
    On March 30, 2012, OMB approved ``Further Amendments to General
Regulations of the Food and Drug Administration to Incorporate Tobacco
Products,'' OMB control number 0910-0690, which amended, among other
sections, Sec.  1.101 to incorporate tobacco products. This amendment
reflects the Agency's authority over tobacco products under the Family
Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Pub. L. 111-31) and added
tobacco products to the list of products covered under Sec.  1.101(a)
and (b).
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                 Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      No. of                          Average
         21 CFR section               No. of       responses per   Total  annual    burden per     Total  hours
                                    respondents     respondent       responses       response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.101(d) (Non-Tobacco products).              73             503          36,719              15         550,785
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.

                                Table 2--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      No. of                          Average
         21 CFR section               No. of        records per    Total  annual    burden per     Total  hours
                                   recordkeepers   recordkeeper       records      recordkeeping
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.101(b), (c), and (e) (Non-                 320               3             960              22          21,120
 Tobacco Products)..............
1.101(b) (Non-Tobacco Products                 1             189             189              22           4,158
 for Office of International
 Programs only).................
1.101(b) (Tobacco Products Only)             158               3             474              22          10,428
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............          35,706
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.

    Dated: June 26, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-15647 Filed 7-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 40 (Thursday, February 28, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 6778]
[FR Doc No: 2019-03439]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. IS18-766-000; IS18-767-000]

Mid-America Pipeline Company, LLC; Seminole Pipeline Company LLC;
Notice Rescheduling Technical Conference

    The technical conference originally scheduled for January 17, 2019,
in the above-referenced proceeding, is hereby rescheduled to convene on
March 26, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time). It will occur in
Hearing Room 7 at the Commission's Washington, DC office.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See the Notice of Technical Conference issued on December
12, 2018, for additional details regarding this conference.

    Dated: February 21, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-03439 Filed 2-27-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P