[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 6319]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01914]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 7019-068]

Eastern Hydroelectric Corporation; Notice Rejecting Request for
Rehearing

    On December 7, 2012, Commission staff issued an order amending
license Article 401 for Eastern Hydroelectric Corporation's (Eastern
Hydroelectric) East Juliette Project No. 7019, located on the Ocmulgee
River in East Juliette, Jones County, Georgia.\1\ On January 11, 2013,
Eastern Hydroelectric filed a request for rehearing of Commission
staff's order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Eastern Hydroelectric Corp., 141 FERC ] 62,176 (2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to section 313(a) of the Federal Power Act (FPA),\2\ an
aggrieved party must file a request for rehearing within thirty days
after the issuance of a Commission decision, in this case no later than
January 7, 2013.\3\ Because the 30-day rehearing deadline is
statutorily based, it cannot be extended, and the request for rehearing
filed by petitioner must be rejected as untimely.\4\ Furthermore,
petitioner's failure to file a timely request for rehearing constitutes
acceptance of Commission staff's order.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 16 U.S.C. 825l (2006).
    \3\ See 18 CFR 385.2007 (2012) (stating that if the last day of
any time period is a Sunday, the period does not end until the close
of the Commission's business on the next business day).
    \4\ In addition, the pleading as filed is deficient, and subject
to dismissal, because it failed to include a Statement of Issues, as
required by section 385.713(c)(2) of the Commission's regulations,
18 CFR 385.713(c)(2) (2012).
    \5\ See Eastern Hydroelectric, 141 FERC ] 62,176 (2012) at
Ordering Paragraph (I).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice constitutes final agency action. Requests for rehearing
by the Commission of this rejection must be filed within 30 days of the
date of issuance of this notice pursuant to section 313(a) of the
Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 825l (2006), and section 385.713 of the
Commission's regulations, 18 CFR 385.713 (2012).

    Dated: January 17, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-01914 Filed 1-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 206 (Friday, October 23, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67536-67538]
[FR Doc No: 2020-23500]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0750; FRL-10015-60]

Pesticide Registration Review; Proposed Interim Decision for
Paraquat

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's proposed
interim registration review decision and opens a 60-day public comment
period on the proposed interim decision for paraquat.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 22, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by the docket
identification (ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest
provided in the Table in Unit IV, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.

    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For pesticide specific information, contact: The Chemical Review
Manager for the pesticide of interest identified in the Table in Unit
IV.
    For general information on the registration review program,
contact: Melanie Biscoe, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P),
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(703) 305-7106; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest
identified in the Table in Unit IV.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information on a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.

II. Background

    Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide
registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the
statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform
its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human
health or the environment. As part of the registration review process,
the Agency has completed proposed interim decisions for all pesticides
listed in the Table in Unit IV. Through this program, EPA is ensuring
that each pesticide's registration is based on current scientific and
other knowledge, including its effects on human health and the
environment.

III. Authority

    EPA is conducting its registration review of the chemicals listed
in the Table in Unit IV pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural
Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C.
Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the
registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under
FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only
if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA
section 3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance with
widespread and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must
perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on
the environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the
environment, or a human dietary risk from residues that result from the
use of a pesticide in or on food.

IV. What action is the Agency taking?

    Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58, this notice announces the availability
of EPA's proposed interim registration review decision for the
pesticide shown in Table 1 and opens a 60-day public comment period on
the proposed interim registration review decision.

                                       Table 1--Proposed Interim Decisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Chemical review manager and
Registration review case name and No.                 Docket ID No.                     contact information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paraquat Dichloride, Case Number 0262  EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0855                        Ana Pinto<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The registration review docket for a pesticide includes earlier
documents related to the registration review case. For example, the
review opened with a Preliminary Work Plan, for public comment. A Final
Work Plan was placed in the docket following public comment on the
Preliminary Work Plan.
    The documents in the dockets describe EPA's rationales for
conducting additional risk assessments for the registration review of
the pesticides included in the tables in Unit IV, as well as the
Agency's subsequent risk findings and consideration of possible risk
mitigation measures. These proposed interim registration review
decisions are supported by the rationales included in those documents.
Following public comment, the Agency will issue interim or final
registration review decisions for the pesticides listed in Table 1 in
Unit IV.
    The registration review final rule at 40 CFR 155.58(a) provides for
a minimum 60-day public comment period on all proposed interim
registration review decisions. This comment period is intended to
provide an opportunity for public input and a mechanism for initiating
any necessary amendments to the proposed interim decision. All comments
should be submitted using the methods in ADDRESSES and must be received
by EPA on or before the closing date. These comments will become part
of the docket for the pesticides included in the Tables in Unit IV.
Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked
``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late comments.
    The Agency will carefully consider all comments received by the
closing date and may provide a ``Response to Comments Memorandum'' in
the docket. The interim registration review decision will explain the
effect that any comments had on the interim decision and provide the
Agency's response to significant comments.
    Background on the registration review program is provided at:
http://www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation.

(Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.)

    Dated: October 6, 2020.
Mary Reaves,
Acting Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2020-23500 Filed 10-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: June 1, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 105)]
[Notices]
[Page 31243-31244]
[DOCID:fr01jn06-121]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-53863; No. SR-FICC-2006-06]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Eligibility To Become a Funds-Only Settling Bank Member

May 24, 2006.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on April 6, 2006, the Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation (``FICC'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared
primarily by FICC. FICC filed the proposed rule change pursuant to
section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act \2\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(1) \3\
thereunder so that the proposal was effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The proposed rule change will clarify the types of entities that
are eligible to become a funds-only settling bank member.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, FICC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the

proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. FICC has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of
such statements.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Commission has modified the text of the summaries
prepared by FICC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to modify Rules 1 and
4(b)(ii) of FICC's Government Securities Division's (``GSD'') rulebook
to clarify that an entity that is neither a bank nor a trust company
but does have direct access to a Federal Reserve Bank and the National
Settlement System of the Federal Reserve is eligible to become a GSD
funds-only settling bank member.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ As of the date of this rule filing, this situation applies
to one GSD member that plans to act as a settling bank for itself.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FICC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Act \6\ and the rules thereunder
because it makes a necessary technical change to the membership
provisions for funds-only settling banks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    FICC does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any
impact or impose any burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not yet
been solicited or received. FICC will notify the Commission of any
written comments it receives.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(i) \7\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(1) \8\ thereunder
because it constitutes a stated policy, practice, or interpretation
with respect to the meaning, administration, or enforcement of an
existing rule. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File No. SR-FICC-2006-06 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File No. SR-FICC-2006-06. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C 552, will be available for inspection and copying
in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at FICC's principal office and on FICC's Web
site at http://www.ficc.com/gov/gov.docs.jsp?NS-query=. All comments

received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submission should refer to File No. SR-FICC-2006-06 and should be
submitted on or before June 22, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-8439 Filed 5-31-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 8, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12627-12629]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5176]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0185; Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-002-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Models
DA 42, DA 42 NG, and DA 42 M-NG Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    Since 2004, more than 30 reports have been received of in-flight
loss of a rear passenger door on Diamond aeroplanes, the majority of
which were DA 40. In additional, at least 18 doors have been
replaced because of damage found on the hinge.
    Diamond Aircraft Industries conducted analyses and structural
tests to determine the root cause of the door opening in flight. The
conclusions were that the primary locking mechanism provided
adequate strength to react to the loads in flight. It was also
determined that the root cause was the crew not properly securing
the rear passenger door by the main locking mechanism, prior to
flight. Damage to the hinges has been caused primarily by external
loads (wind gust conditions) while the aeroplane was parked.
    All DA 40 and DA 42 aeroplanes have a system installed that
provides a warning if the main door latch is not fully closed and a
secondary safety latch (with retaining bracket) design feature. The
initial intended design function of the latch was to hold the rear
passenger door in the ``near closed'' position while on the ground,
protecting the door from wind gusts. However, the original retaining
bracket Part Number (P/N) DA4-5200-00-69 might not hold the door in
this ``near closed'' position while in flight * * *.
    This condition, if not corrected, could result in the rear
passenger door opening and departing the aeroplane in flight.

    The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address
the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 22, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH, N.A. Otto-Stra[szlig]e 5, A-2700
Wiener Neustadt, Austria, telephone: +43 2622 26700; fax: +43 2622
26780; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.diamond-air.at. You may review copies of the referenced service information at
the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0185;
Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-002-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued AD
No. 2010-0235, dated November 10, 2010 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:

    Since 2004, more than 30 reports have been received of in-flight
loss of a rear passenger door on Diamond aeroplanes, the majority of
which were DA 40. In additional, at least 18 doors have been
replaced because of damage found on the hinge.
    Diamond Aircraft Industries conducted analyses and structural
tests to determine the root cause of the door opening in flight. The
conclusions were that the primary locking mechanism provided
adequate strength to react to the loads in flight. It was also
determined that the root cause was the crew not properly securing
the rear passenger door by the main locking mechanism, prior to
flight. Damage to the hinges has been caused primarily by external
loads (wind gust conditions) while the aeroplane was parked.
    All DA 40 and DA 42 aeroplanes have a system installed that
provides a warning if the main door latch is not fully closed and a
secondary safety latch (with retaining bracket) design feature. The
initial intended design function of the latch was to hold the rear
passenger door in the ``near closed'' position while on the ground,
protecting the door from wind gusts. However, the original retaining
bracket Part Number (P/N) DA4-5200-00-69 might not hold the door in
this ``near closed'' position while in flight. To address this
problem, DAI have designed an improved retaining bracket, P/N DA4-
5200-00-69-SB, which has been satisfactory tested to hold the door
closed in flight. In addition, DAI have revised the Airplane Flight
Manual (AFM) emergency door unlocked/open procedure.

    This condition, if not corrected, could result in the rear
passenger door opening and departing the aeroplane in flight.
    For the reasons described above, this AD requires implementation
of amendment of the AFM procedures for flight with the door
unlocked/open, and replacement of the passenger door retaining
bracket with an improved part.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
    The MCAI covers Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Models DA 40 and
DA 40F, DA 42, DA 42 NG, and DA 42 M-NG airplanes. Before the FAA
received the MCAI, on November 23, 2010, we issued AD 2010-25-01,
Amendment 39-16534 (75 FR 75868, December 7, 2010), as a unilateral
action to address this unsafe condition on Models DA 40 and DA 40F
airplanes. Since AD 2010-25-01 already addresses this unsafe condition
on Models DA 40 and DA 40F airplanes, we are not including those models
in this proposed AD.
    Before we issued AD 2010-25-01, we received a comment on the notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) requesting that, due to common operating
practice of leaving the front canopy open during taxi operations, the
front canopy latch sensor be disconnected from the `door open'
annunciation. This would allow illumination only when the rear door was
not properly latched to alert the pilot to the unsafe condition. In
that NPRM, the FAA stated that further analysis was being done.
    At this time, we believe the actions required in AD 2010-25-01
adequately address the unsafe condition on Models DA 40 and DA 40F
airplanes and the similar actions in this proposed AD addresses the
unsafe condition on Models DA 42, DA 42-NG, and DA 42 M-NG airplanes.

Relevant Service Information

    Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH has issued Mandatory Service
Bulletin No. MSB 42-083/No. MSB 42NG-014, dated July 13, 2010, and
Working Instruction WI-MSB-42-083/WI-MSB-42NG-014, dated July 13, 2010.
The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service
Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 162 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 2 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost
about $71 per product.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $39,042 or $241 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH: Docket No. FAA-2011-0185;
Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-002-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by April 22, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) AD 2010-25-01 addresses this same condition on Diamond
Aircraft Industries GmbH Models DA 40 and DA 40F airplanes.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Models
DA 42, DA 42-NG, and DA 42 M-NG airplanes, all serial numbers,
certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 52: Doors.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    Since 2004, more than 30 reports have been received of in-flight
loss of a rear passenger door on Diamond aeroplanes, the majority of
which were DA 40. In additional, at least 18 doors have been
replaced because of damage found on the hinge.
    Diamond Aircraft Industries conducted analyses and structural
tests to determine the root cause of the door opening in flight. The
conclusions were that the primary locking mechanism provided
adequate strength to react to the loads in flight. It was also
determined that the root cause was the crew not properly securing
the rear passenger door by the main locking mechanism, prior to
flight. Damage to the hinges has been caused primarily by external
loads (wind gust conditions) while the aeroplane was parked.
    All DA 40 and DA 42 aeroplanes have a system installed that
provides a warning if the main door latch is not fully closed and a
secondary safety latch (with retaining bracket) design feature. The
initial intended design function of the latch was to hold the rear
passenger door in the ``near closed'' position while on the ground,
protecting the door from wind gusts. However, the original retaining
bracket Part Number (P/N) DA4-5200-00-69 might not hold the door in
this ``near closed'' position while in flight. To address this
problem, DAI have designed an improved retaining bracket, P/N DA4-
5200-00-69-SB, which has been satisfactory tested to hold the door
closed in flight. In addition, DAI have revised the Airplane Flight
Manual (AFM) emergency door unlocked/open procedure.
    This condition, if not corrected, could result in the rear
passenger door opening and departing the aeroplane in flight.
    For the reasons described above, this AD requires implementation
of amendment of the AFM procedures for flight with the door
unlocked/open, and replacement of the passenger door retaining
bracket with an improved part.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD,
incorporate Diamond Aircraft Temporary Revision TR-M[Auml]M 42-443,
pages 3-55a and 3-55b, dated June 17, 2010, into the FAA-approved
airplane flight manual following Diamond Aircraft Temporary Revision
TR-M[Auml]M 42-443, Cover Page, dated June 17, 2010.
    (2) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, replace
the rear passenger door retaining bracket with an improved design
retaining bracket following Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH
Mandatory Service Bulletin No. MSB 42-083/No. MSB 42NG-014, dated
July 13, 2010; and Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Work Instruction
WI-MSB 42-083/WI-MSB 42NG-014, dated July 13, 2010.
    (3) As of 6 months after the effective date of this AD, do not
install a part number DA4-5200-00-69 rear passenger door retaining
bracket.

    FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: On November 23, 2010, we issued AD 2010-25-01 as a
unilateral action to address this unsafe condition on Diamond
Aircraft Industries GmbH Models DA 40 and DA 40F airplanes.
Subsequently, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) issued AD
2010-0235 to address the same unsafe condition on both DA 40 and DA
42 series airplanes. Since AD 2010-25-01 already addresses this
unsafe condition on Models DA 40 and DA 40F airplanes, we are not
including those models in this AD.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI EASA AD 2010-0235, dated November 10, 2010;
Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Mandatory Service Bulletin No. MSB
42-083/No. MSB 42NG-014, dated July 13, 2010; Diamond Aircraft
Industries GmbH Work Instruction WI-MSB 42-083/WI-MSB 42NG-014,
dated July 13, 2010; and Diamond Aircraft Temporary Revision TR-
M[Auml]M 42-443, pages 3-55a and 3-55b, dated June 17, 2010, for
related information. For service information related to this AD,
contact Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH, N.A. Otto-Stra[szlig]e 5,
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria, telephone: +43 2622 26700; fax: +43
2622 26780; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.diamond-air.at. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March 2, 2011.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-5176 Filed 3-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19292-19293]
[FR Doc No: 2021-07526]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 91501/April 7, 2021]

In the Matter of the Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. For an Order of
Approval of Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the 2x
Long VIX Futures ETF (File No. SR-CboeBZX-2020-053); Order Scheduling
Filing of Statements on Review

    On June 23, 2020, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to list and trade
shares of the 2x Long VIX Futures ETF under BZX Rule 14.11(f)(4). On
June 26, 2020, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change. The proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, was
published for comment in the Federal Register on July 10, 2020.\3\ On
August 13, 2020, the Division of Trading and

Markets (``Division''), pursuant to delegated authority, extended the
time period for Commission action on the proposed rule change.\4\ On
October 7, 2020, the Division, pursuant to delegated authority,
instituted proceedings pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \5\
to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change,
as modified by Amendment No. 1.\6\ On December 15, 2020, the Division,
pursuant to delegated authority, designated a longer period for
Commission action on the proposed rule change.\7\ On February 1, 2021,
the Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change, which
replaced and superseded the proposed rule change as modified by
Amendment No. 1. On February 16, 2021, the Exchange submitted Amendment
No. 3 to the proposed rule change and, on February 19, 2021, the
Exchange withdrew Amendment No. 3. On February 19, 2021, the Exchange
filed partial Amendment No. 4 to the proposed rule change. The
Commission received one comment letter on the proposed rule change.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89234 (July 6,
2020), 85 FR 41644.
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89545, 85 FR 51124
(August 19, 2020).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90118, 85 FR 64563
(October 13, 2020).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90671, 85 FR 83136
(December 21, 2020).
    \8\ The comment letter, as well as all of the amendments to the
proposed rule change (except for the one that was withdrawn) are
available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboebzx-2020-053/srcboebzx2020053.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 5, 2021, the Division, pursuant to delegated authority,\9\
noticed the filing of Amendments No. 2 and No. 4 and approved the
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendments No. 2 and No. 4, on an
accelerated basis.\10\ On March 5, 2021, the Assistant Secretary of the
Commission notified BZX that, pursuant to Commission Rule of Practice
431,\11\ the Commission would review the Division's action pursuant to
delegated authority and that the Division's action pursuant to
delegated authority was stayed until the Commission orders
otherwise.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 91265 (March 5,
2021), 86 FR 13922 (March 11, 2021).
    \11\ 17 CFR 201.431.
    \12\ See letter from J. Matthew DeLesDernier, Assistant
Secretary, Commission, to Kyle Murray, Vice President and Associate
General Counsel, Cboe Global Markets, dated March 5, 2021, available
at https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/cboebzx/2018/34-91265-letter-from-assistant-secretary.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, it is ordered, pursuant to Commission Rule of Practice
431, that by May 7, 2021, any party or other person may file a
statement in support of, or in opposition to, the action made pursuant
to delegated authority.
    It is further ordered that the order approving proposed rule change
SR-CboeBZX-2020-053 shall remain stayed pending further order of the
Commission.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-07526 Filed 4-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D. C. 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES December 8, 2004 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Review of materials submitted by Monsanto in support of amendments to their Section G Experimental Use Permit ( EUP No: 524 EUP 96, DP# 310095) for Cry3Bb1 corn. Submission dated July 30, 2004.

TO: Michael Mendelsohn Senior Regulatory Action Leader Microbial Pesticides Branch, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division ( 7511C)

FROM: Tessa Milofsky, M. S. Agronomist Microbial Pesticides Branch, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division ( 7511C)

PEER REVIEW: Alan Reynolds, M. S. Entomologist Microbial Pesticides Branch, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division ( 7511C)

CONCLUSION The requested EUP extension and corresponding acreage increase are acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION   The participant/ collaborator information is sufficient provided that undisclosed collaborator names and contact information are submitted prior to experiment initiation. BACKGROUND This is a request to extend the duration and increase the allowable acreage permitted under the existing EUP for Cry3Bb1 corn ( vector ZMIR39). EUP acres may include ZMIR39 corn hybrids, MON810 ( CryAb1) corn hybrids, ZMIR39 x MON810 stacked corn hybrids, and border rows. The present EUP ( last amended April 27, 2004) permits test plant cultivation on 2,529.13 acres in 28 different states and Puerto Rico and is slated to expire February 28, 2005. On August 2, 1996 and March 31, 2004, respectively, the CryAb1 and Cry3Bb1 proteins, and the genetic material required for their production, were exempted from the requirement of a tolerance when used as plant incorporated protectants in the food and feed commodities of field corn, sweet corn, and popcorn ( 40 CFR 2004, § 180.1173 and § 180.1214). Consequently, non crop destruct status has been granted, meaning that confinement and destruction of plant material ( e. g., pollen, seeds, stalks, etc.) is not required for this EUP.

PROGRAM OVERVIEW This submission requests that the present EUP be extended until March 1, 2006. The registrant also requests that the allowable EUP acreage be increased to 4,682.87 acres for the 2005  2006 growing season. The attached EUP spreadsheet ( Appendix 1) lists the proposed acreages for each state.

EUP Labels Labels were provided for ZMIR39 corn, MON810 corn, and the ZMIR39 x MON810 stack.

BPPD Review The labels are acceptable.

Participant/ Collaborator Information The names, telephone numbers, and mailing addresses of participants and collaborators ( partial listing) who will supervise experimental work covered under this EUP are listed in Sections G. 1. a. and G. 1. b., respectively.

BPPD Review The participant/ collaborator information is sufficient provided that undisclosed collaborator names and contact information are submitted to the Agency prior to experiment initiation.

Field Trial Containment Monsanto's proposed field trial containment program complies with the USDA APHIS Performance Standards for regulated corn trials. The USDA's guidelines are general, leaving room for registrants to develop containment programs that are appropriate for each management system.

BPPD Review Containment procedures described in the submission are adequate. Trial Protocols Trial protocols proposed for the period March 1, 2005  March 1, 2006 are described below. The submission included a comprehensive table ( Appendix 1) which lists, on a state by state basis, the number of acres dedicated to each protocol.

Acreage Protocol Type ZMIR39 MON810 ZMIR39 x MON810 Border Rows Total Breeding and observation 410.65 159.00 297.20 175.32 1,042.17 Inbred seed increase production 808.50 97.30 396.50 158.05 1,460.35 Line per se, hybrid yield and herbicide tolerance trials 457.50 332.00 374.00 451.40 1,614.90 Insect efficacy trials 91.55 79.15 86.55 198.60 455.85 Product characterization and performance trials 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Insect resistance management trials 5.20 2.60 5.20 2.60 15.60 Nontarget organisms and benefit trials 2.00 0.50 2.00 0.50 5.00 Seed treatment trials 2.00 0.50 2.00 0.50 5.00 Swine growth and feed efficiency trials 8.00 0 0 0 8.00 Dairy cattle feed efficiency trials 4.00 0 0 0 4.00 Beef cattle growth and feed efficiency trials 36.00 0 0 0 36.00 Cattle grazing feed efficiency trials 32.00 0 0 0 32.00 Total 1,858.4 672.05 1,164.45 987.97 4,682.87 Protocol descriptions include information on the objective, experimental design, plot treatments, genotypes, estimated planting and harvest schedules for each trial, and containment procedures ( shipping, pollen flow, and post harvest). Details of these components may be found in the submission.

BPPD Review Acreage requests are acceptable.

Acreage Calculation Acreage was presented as a breakdown between ZMIR39 corn hybrids, MON810 corn hybrids, ZMIR39 x MON810 stacked corn hybrids, and border rows. The acreage breakdown presented in the ` Trial Protocol' section ( above) presents the total acreage for all four categories.

Some states and territories have climates which allow multiple plantings per year. Hawaii and Puerto Rico are generally considered to have continuous planting. For these areas, acres are counted only one time. Thus, if 20 acres is listed for Hawaii and these acres are planted three times in one year, the acreage is still listed as 20.

BPPD Review This approach to acreage calculation is acceptable. FUTURE SUBMISSIONS Below are recommendations for future EUP submissions. These recommendations reflect deficiencies that were identified in 2005 requests for EUP acreage.

Final Report It is recommended that the following items should be listed in final reports:   A state by state breakdown of acreage per protocol.   A state by state breakdown of locations per protocol.   A listing of experiments conducted within each protocol.   Average acreage per location for each experiment included within each protocol ( ideally this would be presented on a state by state basis).

Future Requests for EUP Acreage If EUP requests are to be objectively evaluated, it is strongly recommended that future submissions should include the following information:   Protocols to be conducted.   Experiments to be included within each protocol.   Estimated state by state breakdown of acreage per protocol.   Estimated state by state breakdown of locations per protocol.   Estimate of acreage and locations required for each experiment included within protocols ( ideally this would be presented on a state by state basis).   If an acreage increase is requested for one or more protocols, justification should be provided for those increases ( justification should be provided on a protocol by protocol basis).   Objective and brief description of each experiment included within protocols. Approximate number of hybrids/ inbreds/ isolines to be tested should also be included ( may be presented as average number of lines per location).   Clear explanation of acreage calculation, including a breakdown of EUP acreage designated for test plants, non test plants, and border rows included within experimental blocks.   It should be noted that EUP acreage designated for demonstration trials is generally considered inappropriate.


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 95133-95134]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31168]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0346; FRL-9955-73-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Area Sources: Acrylic and
Modacrylic Fibers Production, Carbon Black Production, Chemical
Manufacturing: Chromium Compounds, Flexible Polyurethane Foam
Production and Fabrication, Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing, and Wood
Preserving (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), ``NESHAP for Area Sources:
Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers Production, Carbon Black Production,
Chemical Manufacturing: Chromium Compounds, Flexible Polyurethane Foam
Production and Fabrication, Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing, and Wood
Preserving (40 CFR part 63, subparts LLLLLL, MMMMMM, NNNNNN, OOOOOO,
PPPPPP, and QQQQQQ) (Renewal)'' EPA ICR Number 2256.05, OMB Control
Number 2060-0598, to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is
currently approved through December 31, 2016. Public comments were
requested previously via the Federal Register (81 FR 26546) on May 3,
2016 during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an
additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller description of the ICR
is given below, including its estimated burden and cost to the public.
An Agency may neither conduct nor sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before January 26,
2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2013-0346, to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: EPA established NESHAP for seven area source categories.
The requirements for two area source categories (Flexible Polyurethane
Foam Production and Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication) are
combined in one Subpart. These standards include emissions limitations
and work practice requirements for new and existing plants based on the
generally available control technology or management practices (GACT)
for each area source category. Potential respondents include one
existing acrylic and modacrylic production facility, two existing
chromium product manufacturing facilities, 500 existing flexible
polyurethane foam production and fabrication facilities, 60 existing
lead acid battery manufacturing facilities, and 393 existing wood
preserving

facilities. The total annual responses attributable to this ICR for
existing sources are two one-time notifications; some existing
facilities may be required to prepare a startup, shutdown, and
malfunction plan, perform additional monitoring and recordkeeping, and/
or conduct an initial performance test. The owner or operator of a new
area source would be required to comply with all requirements of the
General Provisions (40 CFR part 63, subpart A).
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Acrylic and modacrylic fibers
production, carbon black production, chemical manufacturing: Chromium
compounds, flexible polyurethane foam production and fabrication, lead
acid battery manufacturing, and wood preserving facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subparts LLLLLL, MMMMMM, NNNNNN, OOOOOO, PPPPPP, and QQQQQQ).
    Estimated number of respondents: 956 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, semiannually, and occasionally.
    Total estimated burden: 6,340 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $654,000 (per year), which includes neither
annualized capital/startup nor operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an adjustment increase in the
respondent burden hours in this ICR compared to the previous ICR. This
is not due to program changes; rather, the increase occurred due to a
difference in the assumption and calculation methodology. This ICR
assumes existing sources will need to re-familiarize themselves with
the regulatory requirements each year. This change in assumption
results in an increase in the estimated number of labor hours for each
affected industry sector.

Spencer Clark,
Acting Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-31168 Filed 12-23-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 190 (Friday, September 30, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60954-60955]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25189]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-65395; File No. SR-MSRB-2011-12]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board; Notice of Withdrawal of Proposed New Rule G-42, on Political
Contributions and Prohibitions on Municipal Advisory Activities;
Proposed Amendments to Rules G-8, on Books and Records, G-9, on
Preservation of Records, and G-37, on Political Contributions and
Prohibitions on Municipal Securities Business; Proposed Form G-37/G-42
and Form G-37x/G-42x; and a Proposed Restatement of a Rule G-37
Interpretive Notice

September 26, 2011.
    On August 19, 2011, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the
``MSRB'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') a proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\
consisting of (i) proposed MSRB Rule G-42 (on political

contributions and prohibitions on municipal advisory activities); (ii)
proposed amendments that would make conforming changes to MSRB Rules G-
8 (on books and records), G-9 (on preservation of records), and G-37
(on political contributions and prohibitions on municipal securities
business); (iii) proposed Form G-37/G-42 and Form G-37x/G-42x; and (iv)
a proposed restatement of a Rule G-37 interpretive notice issued by the
MSRB in 1997. Notice of the proposed rule change was published in the
Federal Register on September 9, 2011.\3\ The Commission received no
comments on the proposed rule change. On September 9, 2011, the MSRB
withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-MSRB-2011-12).\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65255 (September 2,
2011), 76 FR 55976.
    \4\ See MSRB Notice 2011-51 (September 12, 2011).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-25189 Filed 9-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4354-4356]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00632]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-1496]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Food and Drug Administration Rapid Response Surveys
(Generic Clearance)

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each

proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension
of an existing collection of information, and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the notice. This notice solicits comments
on the use of rapid response surveys to obtain data on safety
information to support quick turnaround decisionmaking about potential
safety problems or risk management solutions from health care
professionals, hospitals, and other user facilities (e.g., nursing
homes, etc.); consumers; manufacturers of biologics, drugs, and medical
devices; distributors; and importers, when FDA must quickly determine
whether or not a problem with a biologic, drug, or medical device
impacts the public health.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by March 14, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2013-N-1496 for ``Agency Information Collection Activities;
Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Food and Drug Administration
Rapid Response Surveys (Generic Clearance).'' Received comments will be
placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential
Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at
the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A63, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

FDA Rapid Response Surveys (Generic Collection), OMB Control Number
0910-0500--Extension

    Section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C
Act) (21 U.S.C. 355), requires that important safety information
relating to all human prescription drug products be made available to
FDA so that it can take appropriate action to protect the public health
when necessary. Section 702 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 372) authorizes
investigational powers to FDA for enforcement of the FD&C Act. Under
section 519 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360i), FDA is authorized to
require manufacturers to report medical device-

related deaths, serious injuries, and malfunctions to FDA; to require
user facilities to report device-related deaths directly to FDA and to
manufacturers; and to report serious injuries to the manufacturer.
Section 522 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360l) authorizes FDA to require
manufacturers to conduct postmarket surveillance of medical devices.
Section 705(b) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 375(b)) authorizes FDA to
collect and disseminate information regarding medical products or
cosmetics in situations involving imminent danger to health or gross
deception of the consumer. Section 903(d)(2) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
393(d)(2)) authorizes the Commissioner of Food and Drugs to implement
general powers (including conducting research) to carry out effectively
the mission of FDA. These sections of the FD&C Act enable FDA to
enhance consumer protection from risks associated with medical products
usage that are not foreseen or apparent during the premarket
notification and review process. FDA's regulations governing
application for Agency approval to market a new drug (21 CFR part 314)
and regulations governing biological products (21 CFR part 600)
implement these statutory provisions. Currently, FDA monitors medical
product related postmarket adverse events via both the mandatory and
voluntary MedWatch reporting systems using FDA Forms 3500 and 3500A
(OMB control number 0910-0291) and the vaccine adverse event reporting
system.
    FDA is seeking OMB clearance to collect vital information via a
series of rapid response surveys. Participation in these surveys will
be voluntary. This request covers rapid response surveys for community
based health care professionals, general type medical facilities,
specialized medical facilities (those known for cardiac surgery,
obstetrics/gynecology services, pediatric services, etc.), other health
care professionals, patients, consumers, and risk managers working in
medical facilities. FDA will use the information gathered from these
surveys to quickly obtain vital information about medical product risks
and interventions to reduce risks so the Agency may take appropriate
public health or regulatory action including dissemination of this
information as necessary and appropriate.
    FDA projects 6 emergency risk related surveys per year with a
sample of between 50 and 10,000 respondents per survey. FDA also
projects a response time of 0.5 hour per response. These estimates are
based on the maximum sample size per questionnaire that FDA may be able
to obtain by working with health care professional organizations. The
annual number of surveys was determined by the maximum number of
surveys per year FDA has ever conducted under this collection.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                                     Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of
                              Activity                                  Number of      responses per     Total annual   Average  burden    Total hours
                                                                       respondents       respondent       responses      per  response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA Rapid Response Survey..........................................          10,000                6           60,000              0.5           30,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    Dated: January 9, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-00632 Filed 1-12-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 30 (Monday, February 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8274-8277]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03121]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2022-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2213]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each

community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical data.
The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have been
revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through issuance
of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Federal
Regulations. The currently effective community number is shown in the
table below and must be used for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will be finalized on the dates
listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS report in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Chief executive                         Online location of
        State and county           Location and case       officer  of        Community map        letter  of map      Date of modification   Community
                                          No.               community          repository             revision                                   No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona:
    Maricopa....................  City of Buckeye (21- The Honorable Eric  Engineering         https://msc.fema.gov/  Apr. 22, 2022........       040039
                                   09-0404P).           Orsborn, Mayor,     Department, 530     portal/advanceSearch.
                                                        City of Buckeye,    East Monroe
                                                        530 East Monroe     Avenue, Buckeye,
                                                        Avenue, Buckeye,    AZ 85326.
                                                        AZ 85326.
    Maricopa....................  City of Peoria (21-  The Honorable       City Hall, 8401     https://msc.fema.gov/  Apr. 29, 2022........       040050
                                   09-1030P).           Cathy Carlat,       West Monroe         portal/advanceSearch.
                                                        Mayor, City of      Street, Peoria,
                                                        Peoria, 8401 West   AZ 85345.
                                                        Monroe Street,
                                                        Peoria, AZ 85345.
California:
    Contra Costa................  City of Oakley,(20-  The Honorable Sue   Public Works and    https://msc.fema.gov/  Feb. 7, 2022.........       060766
                                   09-2109P).           Higgins, Mayor,     Engineering         portal/advanceSearch.
                                                        City of Oakley,     Department, 3231
                                                        3231 Main Street,   Main Street,
                                                        Oakley, CA 94561.   Oakley, CA 94561.
    Placer......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Placer County       https://msc.fema.gov/  May 16, 2022.........       060239
                                   Areas of Placer      Robert Weygandt,    Public Works,       portal/advanceSearch.
                                   County (21-09-       Chairman, Board     3091 County
                                   1293P).              of Supervisors,     Center Drive,
                                                        Placer County,      Suite 220,
                                                        175 Fulweiler       Auburn, CA 95603.
                                                        Avenue, Auburn,
                                                        CA 95603.
    San Bernardino..............  City of Rancho       The Honorable L.    City Hall,          https://msc.fema.gov/  Apr. 28, 2022........       060671
                                   Cucamonga (21-09-    Dennis Michael,     Engineering         portal/advanceSearch.
                                   0942P).              Mayor, City of      Department Plaza
                                                        Rancho Cucamonga,   Level, 10500
                                                        10500 Civic         Civic Center
                                                        Center Drive,       Drive, Rancho
                                                        Rancho Cucamonga,   Cucamonga, CA
                                                        CA 91730.           91730.

    Ventura.....................  City of Simi Valley  The Honorable       City Hall, 2929     https://msc.fema.gov/  Apr. 15, 2022........       060421
                                   (21-09-1199P).       Keith L.            Tapo Canyon Road,   portal/advanceSearch.
                                                        Mashburn, Mayor,    Simi Valley, CA
                                                        City of Simi        93063.
                                                        Valley, 2929 Tapo
                                                        Canyon Road, Simi
                                                        Valley, CA 93063.
Florida: Duval..................  City of              The Honorable       City Hall, 117      https://msc.fema.gov/  April 7, 2022........       120077
                                   Jacksonville (21-    Lenny Curry,        West Duval          portal/advanceSearch.
                                   04-0596P).           Mayor, City of      Street,
                                                        Jacksonville, 117   Jacksonville, FL
                                                        West Duval          32202.
                                                        Street, Suite
                                                        400,
                                                        Jacksonville, FL
                                                        32202.
Illinois
    McHenry.....................  Village of           The Honorable       Village Hall, 2200  https://msc.fema.gov/  May 23, 2022.........       170474
                                   Algonquin (21-05-    Debby Sosine,       Harnish Drive,      portal/advanceSearch.
                                   4386P).              Village             Algonquin, IL
                                                        President,          60102.
                                                        Village of
                                                        Algonquin, 2200
                                                        Harnish Drive,
                                                        Algonquin, IL
                                                        60102.
    Will........................  City of Lockport     The Honorable       Public Works and    https://msc.fema.gov/  May 23, 2022.........       170703
                                   (19-05-4019P).       Steven Streit,      Engineering         portal/advanceSearch.
                                                        Mayor, City of      Department, 17112
                                                        Lockport, 222       South Prime
                                                        East 9th Street,    Boulevard,
                                                        Lockport, IL        Lockport, IL
                                                        60441.              60441.
    Will........................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Will County Land    https://msc.fema.gov/  May 23, 2022.........       170695
                                   Areas of Will        Jennifer Bertino-   Use Department,     portal/advanceSearch.
                                   County (19-05-       Tarrant, Will       58 East Clinton
                                   4019P).              County Executive,   Street, Suite
                                                        Will County         100, Joliet, IL
                                                        Office Building,    60432.
                                                        302 North Chicago
                                                        Street, Joliet,
                                                        IL 60432.
Michigan:
    Wayne.......................  Charter Township of  Mr. Kurt Heise,     Township Hall,      https://msc.fema.gov/  May 6, 2022..........       260237
                                   Plymouth (21-05-     Township            9955 North          portal/advanceSearch.
                                   1510P).              Supervisor,         Haggerty Road,
                                                        Charter Township    Plymouth, MI
                                                        of Plymouth, 9955   48170.
                                                        North Haggerty
                                                        Road, Plymouth,
                                                        MI 48170.
    Wayne.......................  Township of Canton   Mrs. Anne Marie     Canton Municipal    https://msc.fema.gov/  May 6, 2022..........       260219
                                   (21-05-2918P).       Graham-Hudak,       Complex, 1150       portal/advanceSearch.
                                                        Supervisor,         South Canton
                                                        Canton Township,    Center Road,
                                                        1150 South Canton   Canton, MI 48188.
                                                        Center Road,
                                                        Canton, MI 48188.
Minnesota: Marshall.............  City of Argyle (21-  The Honorable       City Hall, 701      https://msc.fema.gov/  April 22, 2022.......       270268
                                   05-4569P).           Robert Clausen,     Pacific Avenue,     portal/advanceSearch.
                                                        Mayor, City of      Argyle, MN 56713.
                                                        Argyle, P.O. Box
                                                        288, Argyle, MN
                                                        56713.
Nebraska: Dawson................  City of Gothenburg   The Honorable       Town Hall, 409 9th  https://msc.fema.gov/  Apr. 29, 2022........       310062
                                   (21-07-0869P).       Joyce Hudson,       Street,             portal/advanceSearch.
                                                        Mayor, City of      Gothenburg, NE
                                                        Gothenburg, 409     69138.
                                                        9th Street,
                                                        Gothenburg, NE
                                                        69138.
New York: Rockland..............  Town of Ramapo (20-  The Honorable       Ramapo Office of    https://msc.fema.gov/  Jun. 1, 2022.........       365340
                                   02-1315P).           Michael B.          the Building        portal/advanceSearch.
                                                        Specht, Town        Inspector, 237
                                                        Supervisor, Town    Route 59,
                                                        of Ramapo, 237      Suffern, NY 10901.
                                                        Route 59,
                                                        Suffern, NY 10901.
Texas: Aransas..................  Unincorporated       The Honorable C.    Aransas County      https://msc.fema.gov/  May 16, 2022.........       485452
                                   Areas of Aransas     H. ``Burt''         Road and Bridge     portal/advanceSearch.
                                   County (21-06-       Mills, Jr.,         Office, 1931 FM
                                   1547P).              County Judge,       2165, Rockport,
                                                        Commissioners       TX 78382.
                                                        Court, Aransas
                                                        County
                                                        Courthouse, 2840
                                                        Highway 35N,
                                                        Rockport, TX
                                                        78382.
Washington: King................  City of Issaquah     The Honorable Mary  City Hall, 1775     https://msc.fema.gov/  Apr. 26, 2022........       530079
                                   (21-10-0355P).       Lou Pauly, Mayor,   12th Avenue         portal/advanceSearch.
                                                        City of Issaquah,   Northwest,
                                                        130 E Sunset Way,   Issaquah, WA
                                                        Issaquah, WA        98027.
                                                        98027.
Wisconsin: Waukesha.............  Village of           Mr. Dave Glasgow,   Village Hall, W156  https://msc.fema.gov/  Apr. 29, 2022........       550483
                                   Menomonee Falls      Village             N8480 Pilgrim       portal/advanceSearch.
                                   (21-05-3044P).       President,          Road, Menomonee
                                                        Village of          Falls, WI 53051.
                                                        Menomonee Falls,
                                                        W156 N8480
                                                        Pilgrim Road,
                                                        Menomonee Falls,
                                                        WI 53051.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-03121 Filed 2-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P