Attachment A:

Facility Data Dioxin Concentrations in Chlorine Condensates PPG, Lake Charles, LA Conc ( pg/ L) ppq Conc ( pg/ L) ppq Conc ( pg/ L) ppq Conc ( pg/ L) ppq conc pg/ L conc pg/ L conc pg/ L conc ( pg/ L)

2378TCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI 27 0 0 0 12378PeCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0 0 123478HxCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0 0 123678HxCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0 0 123789HxCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0 0 1234678HpCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0 153 OCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI 76 19 42 628 2378TCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI 1500 24 72 12300 12378PeCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI 220 0 270 63200 23478PeCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI 290 0 180 35000 123478HxCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI 99 62 1600 81600 123678HxCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI 27 2.4 250 27400 234678HxCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI 19 1.4 85 15200 123789HxCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI 31 12 280 8430 1234678HpCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI 110 48 900 27300 1234789HpCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI 32 38 600 20300 OCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI 160 750 1400 42200 Flow MGD Not given Not given CBI CBI Not given Not given Not given 0.15 PPG, Natrium, WV Dow, Plaquemine, LA Dow, Freeport, TX Attachment A:

Facility Data Dioxin Concentra 2378TCDD 12378PeCDD 123478HxCDD 123678HxCDD 123789HxCDD 1234678HpCDD OCDD 2378TCDF 12378PeCDF 23478PeCDF 123478HxCDF 123678HxCDF 234678HxCDF 123789HxCDF 1234678HpCDF 1234789HpCDF OCDF Flow MGD Occidental,

Convent,

LA Occidental Mobile, AL Occidental,

Muscle Shoals, AL conc ( pg/ L) conc ( pg/ L) conc ( pg/ L) conc ( pg/ L) conc ( pg/ L) conc ( pg/ L) conc ( pg/ L)

0 0 0 0 33.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 18.7 0 0 90.8 0 0.000 100 42.7 0 140 416 42.8 1600 1200 798 1500 6130 2660 1490 2600 3500 4300 12000 22800 28400 5010 1300 2400 1890 7700 14500 11900 3020 2600 3800 6270 16000 25700 49600 7010 580 1200 1360 5300 7530 27900 3690 200 320 460 1600 2650 7450 866 390 950 1230 6000 6770 8190 1240 780 940 973 2900 5930 52500 4970 430 750 993 3200 3910 30200 2380 760.000 1200 1020 3600 5600 78700 5080 0.217 0.217 0.09 0.144 0.14 0.008 0.015 Aug 96 Feb 00 Feb 01 Jan 00 Aug 00 Mar 01 Mar 01 Oxyvinyls, Deer Park,

TX Oxyvinyls, LaPorte, TX ( Battleground Chloralkali ATTACHMENT A: Facility Data Dioxin Concentrations in EDC Quench Water Dow, Freeport, TX Dow, Plaquemine, LA Conc ppq Conc ppq 2378TCDD CBI CBI 12378PeCDD CBI CBI 123478HxCDD CBI CBI 123678HxCDD CBI CBI 123789HxCDD CBI CBI 1234678HpCDD CBI CBI OCDD CBI CBI 2378TCDF CBI CBI 12378PeCDF CBI CBI 23478PeCDF CBI CBI 123478HxCDF CBI CBI 123678HxCDF CBI CBI 234678HxCDF CBI CBI 123789HxCDF CBI CBI 1234678HpCDF CBI CBI 1234789HpCDF CBI CBI OCDF CBI CBI Flow MGD CBI CBI ATTACHMENT A:

Facility Data Dioxin Concentrations in Treated Chlor alkali Wastewater Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L)

2378TCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0 0 0 12378PeCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0 1.65 0 123478HxCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 19.6 0 0 0 123678HxCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0 0 0 123789HxCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0 0 0 1234678HpCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 75.1 23.1 9.14 33.8 OCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 55.7 696 355 189 183 2378TCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 9.8 4.9 5.96 0 1060 12378PeCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 10.7 28 12 8.92 3350 23478PeCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 11.8 43.3 12.5 36.9 2300 123478HxCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 30.9 393 20 15.7 4170 123678HxCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 8.31 104 8.13 2.99 1170 234678HxCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 13.7 82.2 0 0 411 123789HxCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 5.9 0 0 0 1140 1234678HpCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 21.9 1240 13.1 0 1180 1234789HpCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 14.6 425 0 0 700 OCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 56.3 10200 78.3 29.7 1050 Flow ( MGD) CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 2.93 0.0501 14.6 15 0.234 Date 2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 3/ 20/ 02 2/ 28/ 02 12/ 18/ 03 3/ 5/ 04 Aug 00 Stream Name Outfall 102 Outfall 102 Outfall 102 Outfall 701 Outfall 701 Outfall 701 Outfall 301 Outfall 301 Outfall 301 Outfall 101.1Outfall 101.4 K2 North Sewer Outfall 201 Dow, Plaquemine, LA Dow, Freeport, TX 2 Dow, Freeport, TX 1 PPG, Lake Charles, LA PPG, Natirum, WV ATTACHMENT A:

Facility Data Dioxin Concentra 2378TCDD 12378PeCDD 123478HxCDD 123678HxCDD 123789HxCDD 1234678HpCDD OCDD 2378TCDF 12378PeCDF 23478PeCDF 123478HxCDF 123678HxCDF 234678HxCDF 123789HxCDF 1234678HpCDF 1234789HpCDF OCDF Flow ( MGD)

Date Stream Name Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 5.2 10 9.7 13 0 8.55 0 0 13 7.8 5.2 75 580 130 110 200 160 290 86 119 17 180 420 130 77 0 5.6 6.9 6.4 7.2 4.5 0 6.9 3.69 4.26 0 2.9 0 10 0 18 0 18 18 10 7.9 15 4.15 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.6 0 0 6 0 0 0 3.19 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 22 19 30 19 15 22 5.84 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.6 3.6 6.3 8.4 0 3.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 15 12 0 3.99 9.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 48 0 35 46 91 0 28.8 0 0 34 45 21 Not given 63.2 62.6 61.3 45.9 68 Not given 74 74 0.194 Not given 4.2 4.045 6.14 Feb 96 Mar 98 May 98 Aug 98 Jan 99 Feb 99 Apr 99 Aug 99 Aug 200 Nov 01 Feb 96 Mar 98 May 98 Aug 98 Outfall 002 Outfall 002 Outfall 002 Outfall 002 Outfall 002 Outfall 002 Outfall 002 Outfall 002 Outfall 002 Outfall 101 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Oxyvinyls, Deer Park, TX ATTACHMENT A:

Facility Data Dioxin Concentra 2378TCDD 12378PeCDD 123478HxCDD 123678HxCDD 123789HxCDD 1234678HpCDD OCDD 2378TCDF 12378PeCDF 23478PeCDF 123478HxCDF 123678HxCDF 234678HxCDF 123789HxCDF 1234678HpCDF 1234789HpCDF OCDF Flow ( MGD)

Date Stream Name Occidental,

Taft, LA Vulcan,

Geismar, LA Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CBI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CBI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 0CBI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.04 0CBI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.07 0CBI 6.2 5.6 14 0 0 0 3.22 7.43 1.77 3.46CBI 120 140 250 68 35.3 180 180 193 71.64 25.3 CBI 9.7 22 39 0 2.44 0 0 0 0.32 50.2CBI 0 0 5.1 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 233CBI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 221CBI 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 2.76 0.61 769CBI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.68 0.57 306CBI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.86 0.51 164CBI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.08 156CBI 0 0 0 0 37.1 0 0 5.09 0 1160 CBI 0 0 0 0 12.4 0 0 0 0.55 179CBI 88 28 95 0 682 0 0 7.83 0.93 455 CBI 3.56 2.65 Not given 7.03 2.425 1.9425 1.239 1.622 1.68 2.8 CBI Jan 99 Feb 99 Apr 99 Aug 99 Nov 01 Feb 96 Oct 02 Mar 03 May 03 May 02 1995 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001 Outfall001 Oxyvinyls, LaPorte, TX ( Battleground Chlor alkali) ATTACHMENT A:

Facility Data Dioxin Concentrations in Treated Chlor alkali and EDC Wastewater PPG, Lake Charles, LA Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L) Conc ( pg/ L)

2378TCDD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12378PeCDD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123478HxCDD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123678HxCDD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123789HxCDD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1234678HpCDD 12.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OCDD 99.9 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 2378TCDF 39.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12378PeCDF 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23478PeCDF 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123478HxCDF 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123678HxCDF 70.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 234678HxCDF 72.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123789HxCDF 43.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1234678HpCDF 172 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1234789HpCDF 73.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OCDF 494 0 0 0 0.24 0 0.22 0.17 Flow ( MGD) 11.6 Not GivenNot Given Not Given Not Given Not Given Not Given Not Given Date Jun 02 Sep 02 Dec 02 Mar 03 Jun 03 Sep 03 Dec 03 Stream Name Outfall 001Outfall 001Outfall 001Outfall 001Outfall 001Outfall 001Outfall 001 Formosa Plastics, Point Comfort, TX ATTACHMENT A:

Facility Data Dioxin Concentrations in Treated EDC/ VCM Effluent Georgia Gulf,

Plaquemine,

LA Georgia Gulf,

Lake Charles,

LA Occidental,

Ingleside,

TX Conc ppq Conc ppq Conc ppq Conc ppq Conc ppq Conc ppq Conc ppq Conc ppq Conc ppq Conc ppq Conc ppq Conc ppq 2378TCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0 0 12378PeCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0 0 123478HxCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0.03 0 123678HxCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0.11 0 123789HxCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0.06 0 1234678HpCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 29 0 1.5 6.98 OCDD CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 330 0 12.83 32.2 2378TCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0 0 12378PeCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 1.81 8.04 23478PeCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0.41 0 123478HxCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 3.35 14.8 123678HxCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 1.39 11.7 234678HxCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0.59 7.23 123789HxCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 0 0 0.14 0 1234678HpCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 310 30 29.53 64.1 1234789HpCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 69 4 4.02 18.6 OCDF CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 1200 900 632.64 1560 Flow MGD CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI 1.4 0.525 0.893 0.893 Date 2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 Sep 99 May 95 Mar 03 Mar 03 Stream Name Outfall 202Outfall 202Outfall 202Outfall 2001Outfall 2001Outfall 2001 Outfall 001 Outfall 001Outfall 001Outfall 001 Univ of Houston Study * GGLC discharges were not included in the loads analysis because the facility's wastewater is transferred to an adjacent facility's wastewater treatment system prior to d Dow, Plaquemine, LA Oxyvinyls, LaPort, TX Dow, Freeport, TX ATTACHMENT A:

Facility Data 01 dy o discharge. ATTACHMENT A: Facility Data Dioxin Concentrations in Treated PVC Effluent Oxyvinyls, Deer Park, TX Conc pg/ L 2378TCDD 0 12378PeCDD 0 123478HxCDD 0 123678HxCDD 0 123789HxCDD 0 1234678HpCDD 0 OCDD 0.95 2378TCDF 0 12378PeCDF 0 23478PeCDF 0 123478HxCDF 0.17 123678HxCDF 0.16 234678HxCDF 0.46 123789HxCDF 0 1234678HpCDF 8.67 1234789HpCDF 0.9 OCDF 157.09 Flow Not Given Date Jul 03 Stream name Outfall 005


[Federal Register: October 17, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 199)]
[Notices]
[Page 60313]
[DOCID:fr17oc05-48]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP05-419-000]

El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket
Authorization

October 6, 2005.
    Take notice that on September 30, 2005, El Paso Natural Gas Company
(EPNG), P.O. Box 1087, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80944, filed in
Docket No. CP05-419-000 a request pursuant to 18 CFR 157.205(b) and
157.211(a)(2) of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act
for authorization to construct and operate a new delivery point,
located in Maricopa County, Arizona to serve Therm-O-Rock West, Inc.
(Therm-O-Rock), under the authorization issued in Docket No. CP82-435-
000 pursuant to section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully
described in the request.
    This filing is available for review at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov
 using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number

excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,

contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions concerning this request may be directed to Richard
Derryberry, Director of Regulatory Affairs, El Paso Natural Gas
Company, P.O. Box 1087, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80944, at (719) 520-
3782 or Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    EPNG states that Therm-O-Rock currently owns and operates an
industrial minerals processing plant in Maricopa County, Arizona. EPNG
avers that Therm-O-Rock utilizes natural gas to fuel furnaces. EPNG
indicates that Therm-O-Rock has requested natural gas service directly
from EPNG for its processing plant which is currently served by
Southwest Gas Corporation.
    EPNG requests authorization to construct, own and operate the
proposed Willis Road Delivery Point to provide service for Therm-O-
Rock. EPNG contends that EPNG's environmental analysis supports the
conclusion that the construction and operation of the proposed delivery
point would not be a major Federal action significantly affecting the
human environment. EPNG estimates the cost of the proposed facilities
to be approximately $171,852 which would be reimbursed by Therm-O-Rock.
EPNG maintains that the proposal would have no significant effect on
EPNG's peak day and annual deliveries, and service to Therm-O-Rock
through the new delivery point would be accomplished by use of
interruptible transportation capacity without detriment to EPNG's other
existing customers.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days after the
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and, pursuant to Section 157.205 of
the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) (18 CFR
157.205) a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the
time allowed therefore, the proposed activity shall be deemed to be
authorized effective the day after the time allowed for protest. If a
protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as
an application for authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the NGA.
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-filing''
link. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-5658 Filed 10-14-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38093-38094]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15136]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Seventh Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 226, Audio Systems and
Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 226, Audio Systems and
Equipment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the
sixth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 226, Audio Systems and
Equipment

DATES: The meeting will be held July 15-19, 2013 from 9:00 a.m.-5:00
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1150 18th Street NW.,
Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0652/(202) 833-9339, fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org. In addition, Sophie Bouquet may be contacted directly at
(202) 330-0663, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 226. The agenda will
include the following:
     Welcome and Administrative Remarks
     Introductions
     Agenda Overview
     Review previous action items from working groups
     Solicit proposals for further changes to DO-214
     Finish discussion on the following:
    (a) A consistent method for testing of ANR headsets
    (b) A consistent method for testing of Oxygen Mask Microphones
    (c) RF susceptibility issues
    (d) Absolute (envelope) delay
     Incorporate all changes into DO-214 draft
     Final review of DO-214 and draft updates/changes
     Review/Prepare draft for Final Review and Comment Release
     Review next steps and actions for next meeting
     Set next meeting dates
     Adjourn
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 12, 2013.
Paige Williams,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-15136 Filed 6-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13828-13829]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05179]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2016-1059]

Towing Safety Advisory Committee; April 2017 Meeting

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Towing Safety Advisory Committee will meet in Memphis,
Tennessee, to review and discuss recommendations from its Subcommittees
and to receive briefs on items listed in the agenda under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. All meetings will be open to the public.

DATES: The Subcommittees will meet on Tuesday, April 11, 2017, from 8
a.m. to 5:30 p.m. The full Towing Safety Advisory Committee will meet
on Wednesday, April 12, 2017, from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. These meetings
may close early if the Subcommittees or Committee have completed its
business.

ADDRESSES: All meetings will be held at the Doubletree Hotel by Hilton,
5069 Sanderlin Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38117. The telephone number
for the Doubletree Hotel is<PHONE_NUMBER>. The hotel Web site is: http://doubletree3.hilton.com/en/hotels/tennessee/doubletree-by-hilton-hotel-memphis-MEMEHDT/index.html
    For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities, or to request special assistance at the meetings, contact
the individual listed in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT below as soon
as possible.
    Instructions: You are free to submit comments at any time,
including orally

at the meetings, but if you want committee members to review your
comment before the meetings, please submit your comments no later than
April 2, 2017. We are particularly interested in comments on the issues
in the ``Agenda'' section below. You must include ``Department of
Homeland Security'' and the docket number [USCG-2016-1059] in your
submission. Written comments should be submitted using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. If you encounter
technical difficulties, contact Mr. William J. Abernathy. Comments
received will be posted without alteration at http://www.regulations.gov including any personal information provided. You
may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal Docket Management
System in the March 24, 2005 issue of the Federal Register (70 FR
15086).
    Docket Search: For access to the docket to read documents or
comments related to this notice, go to http://www.regulations.gov, and
use ``USCG-2016-1059'' in the ``Search'' box, press Enter, and then
click on the item you wish to view.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commandant (CG-OES-2) ATTN: Mr.
William J. Abernathy, Towing Safety Advisory Committee Alternate
Designated Federal Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin
Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509; telephone 202-
372-1363, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is in compliance with
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Title 5, U.S.C. Appendix). This
committee is established in accordance with, and operates under the
provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. As stated in 33
U.S.C. 1231a, the Towing Safety Advisory Committee provides advice and
recommendations to the Department of Homeland Security on matters
relating to shallow-draft inland and coastal waterway navigation and
towing safety.
    Further information about the Towing Safety Advisory Committee is
available here: http://www.facadatabase.gov. Click on the search tab
and type ``Towing Safety'' into the search form.

Agenda of Meetings

    A copy of each draft report and presentation as well as the meeting
agenda will be available at: http://homeport.uscg.mil/tsac.
    On April 11 and 12, 2017, the Towing Safety Advisory Committee and
its subcommittees will meet to review, discuss, deliberate, and
formulate recommendations, as appropriate, on the following:

Current Subcommittees and Tasks

a. Articulated Tug and Barge Operations and Manning (Task 15-02)
b. Electronic Charting Systems (Task 15-03)
c. Subchapter M Implementation (Task 16-01)
d. Inland Firefighting (Task 16-02)
e. Towing Liquefied Natural Gas Barges (Task 16-03)

    Public comments or questions will be taken throughout the meeting
as the committee discusses the issues and prior to deliberations and
voting. There will also be a public comment period at the end of the
meeting. Speakers are requested to limit their comments to 5 minutes.
Please note that the public comment period may end before the period
allotted, following the last call for comments. Contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above to register
as a speaker.

Notices of Future 2017 Towing Safety Advisory Committee Meetings

    To receive automatic email notices of future Towing Safety Advisory
Committee meetings in 2017, go to the online docket, USCG-2016-1059
(http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=USCG-2016-1059), and
select the Sign-up-for-Email-Alerts option. We plan to use the same
docket number for all Towing Safety Advisory Committee meeting notices
in 2017, so when the next meeting notice is published you will receive
an email alert from http://www.regulations.gov when the notice appears
in this docket, in addition to notices of other items being added to
the docket.

    Dated: March 10, 2017.
J.G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2017-05179 Filed 3-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 			UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

						REGION III

					      1650 Arch Street

				   Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

  ADVANCE \x 0

DATE:	February 2, 2007

SUBJECT:	Technical Support Document - State Operating Permit Programs;
West Virginia; Amendment to the Definitions of a “Major Source” and
“Volatile Organic Compound”

  ADVANCE \x 0 FROM:	Rosemarie Nino  /s/

                      Permits and Technical Assessment Branch

  ADVANCE \x 0 TO:               David Campbell, Chief

                      Permits and Technical Assessment Branch

TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT

EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0625

West Virginia; Amendment to the Definitions of a “Major Source” and

“Volatile Organic Compounds”

I.	 	BACKGROUND

	On September 10, 2003, EPA Region III received a revision to West
Virginia’s legislative rule 45 CSR 30 - Requirements for Operating
Permits, which became effective June 1, 2003, as an amendment to West
Virginia’s fully approved Title V Operating Permit Program under 40
CFR Part 70.  The State amended this regulation to correct (1) the
definition of “major source;” (2) strike the existing definition of
“volatile organic compound” (VOC) and insert in its place the
reference to the federal definition of VOC; and, (3) to make other
administrative corrections, i.e., revise Director to Secretary, Division
to Department, Office to Division and filing and effective date changes.

	West Virginia is seeking approval of these amendments to this rule
pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1990 that required
States to submit to EPA program revisions in accordance with the Federal
Title V regulations.

II.	SUMMARY OF ACTION

	EPA is taking direct final action to amend WV’s Legislative Rule 45
CSR 30 – Requirements for Operating Permits submitted by WVDEP on
September 10, 2003.

III.	PROGRAM REVIEW

	What is the State Operating Permit Program?

The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 required all States to develop
operating permit programs that meet certain Federal criteria.  When
implementing the operating permit programs, the States require certain
sources of air pollution to obtain permits that contain all of their
applicable requirements under the Clean Air Act (CAA).  The focus of the
operating permit program is to improve enforcement by issuing each
source a permit that consolidates all of its applicable CAA requirements
into a Federally-enforceable document.  By consolidating all of the
applicable requirements for a given air pollution source into an
operating permit, the source, the public, and the State environmental
agency can more easily understand what CAA requirements apply and how
compliance with those requirements is determined.

Sources required to obtain an operating permit under this program
include “major” sources of air pollution and certain other sources
specified in the CAA or in EPA’s implementing regulations.  For
example, all sources regulated under the acid rain program, regardless
of size, must obtain operating permits.  Examples of “major” sources
include those that have the potential to emit 100 tons per year or more
of volatile organic compounds, carbon monoxide, lead, sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen oxides, or particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5); those that emit
10 tons per year of any single hazardous air pollutant (HAP)
specifically listed under the CAA; or those that emit 25 tons per year
or more of a combination of HAPs.  In areas that are not meeting the
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone, carbon
monoxide, or particulate matter, major sources are defined by the
gravity of the nonattainment classification.

B.	What are the State Operating Permit Program Requirements?

The minimum program elements for an approvable operating permit program
are those mandated by Title V of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
and established by EPA’s implementing regulations at title 40, part 70
- “State Operating Permit Programs” in the Code of Federal
Regulations (40 CFR part 70).  Title V required state and local air
pollution control agencies to develop operating permit programs and
submit them to EPA for approval by November 15, 1993.  Under Title V,
State and local air pollution control agencies that implement operating
permit programs are called “permitting authorities.”

	The State was granted final full approval effective on November 23,
2001. On September 10, 2003, West Virginia submitted an amendment to its
currently EPA-approved Title V operating permit program.  In general,
West Virginia amended its operating permit program regulation (45 CSR
30) to correct (1) the definition of “major source;” (2) strike the
existing definition of “volatile organic compound” (VOC) and insert
in its place the reference to the federal definition of VOC; and (3) to
make other administrative corrections, i.e., revise Director to
Secretary, Division to Department, Office to Division and filing and
effective date changes.

These changes will make regulation 45 CSR 30 consistent with the
corresponding provisions of 40 CFR Part 70, which went into effect on
November 27, 2001.

C.	What is being addressed in this document?

	EPA is not opening the entirety of West Virginia’s Title V operating
permit program up to public comment, we are only addressing the changes
listed below.

D.	What are the program changes that EPA is approving?

	West Virginia’s has revised 45 CSR 30, Section 2, Definitions of the
State of West Virginia Regulations Governing the Control of Air
Pollution to be consistent with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 70.2 which
went into effect on November 27, 200l.  West Virginia amended the
definition of a “major source” by removing part of the existing
definition which stated “All other stationary source categories
regulated by a standard promulgated under § 111 or § 112 of the Clean
Air Act, but only with respect to those air pollutants that have been
regulated for that category” and inserted in it place “Any other
stationary source category, which as of August 7, 1980 is being
regulated under section 111 or 112 of the Clean Air Act.”  This would
require a source belonging to a source category subject to federal New
Source Performance Standards (NSPS) or National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants Standards (NESHAPs) standard to include
fugitive emissions of all regulated pollutants, not just the pollutants
regulated by the particular NSPS or NESHAP, in its calculation of major
source status only if the relevant standard was promulgated as of August
7, 1980.

	West Virginia has stricken the definition of “volatile organic
compound” (VOC) and inserted in its place the reference to the federal
definition of VOC.  This change will make this aspect of 45 CSR 30
consistent with the Federal rule.  EPA has no objection to this
revision.

	In addition, West Virginia included the following administrative
corrections: (1) revise Director to Secretary, Division to Department,
Office to Division; and, (2) changed the filing date from June 21, 2001
to April 21, 2003, the effective date from July 1, 2001 to June 1, 2003;
and the former rule dates for filing from April 27, 1994 to June 21,
2001 and effective April 27, 1994 to July 1, 2001.  EPA has no objection
to these revisions.

E.	Change to West Virginia’s Program that Corrects a Deficiency

The EPA has reviewed West Virginia’s September 10, 2003 program
amendment in conjunction with the portion of West Virginia’s program
that was earlier approved.  Based on this review, EPA is granting full
approval of West Virginia’s amended operating permit program.  The EPA
has determined that this amendment to West Virginia’s operating permit
program adequately addresses the deficiency.  West Virginia’s
operating permit program, including this amendment submitted on
September 10, 2003, fully meets the minimum requirements of 40 CFR Part
70.

F.  	What Action is Being Taken by EPA?

The State of West Virginia has satisfactorily addressed a program
deficiency created when EPA made a change to the Federal rule.  The
operating permit program amendment that is the subject of this document
considered together with that portion of West Virginia’s operating
permit program that was earlier approved fully satisfy the requirements
of 40 CFR part 70 and the Clean Air Act.  Therefore, EPA is taking
direct final action to fully approve the West Virginia Title V operating
permit program in accordance with 40 CFR 70.2 definitions of “a major
source” and “VOC.”

The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no
adverse comments.  However, in the “Proposed Rule” section of
today’s Federal Register EPA is publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve this amendment to West
Virginia’s operating permit program if adverse comments are filed
relevant to the issues discussed in this action.  This rule will be
effective on [Insert date 60 days from date of publication in the
Federal Register].  If EPA receives adverse comments, EPA will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.  The EPA will address all public comments in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule.  The EPA will not
institute a second comment period on this action.  Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at this time.  Please note that if
EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph or section of
this rule and if that provision may be servered from the remainder of
the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are
not subject of an adverse comment.

 PAGE   4

 PAGE   4


[Federal Register: June 4, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 108)]
[Notices]
[Page 31860-31861]
[DOCID:fr04jn08-58]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-917-000]

Green Light Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

May 29, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Green Light Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application
includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR
385.211 and 385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest
must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is June 18, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-12444 Filed 6-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: February 4, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 23)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 5692-5695]
[DOCID:fr04fe10-7]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0608; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-215-AD;
Amendment 39-16188; AD 2010-03-05]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-200C and -
200F Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Model 747-200C and -200F series airplanes. This AD requires a high
frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection for cracks of certain fastener
holes, and corrective action if necessary. This AD also requires
repetitive replacements of the upper chords, straps (or angles), and
radius fillers of certain upper deck floor beams, and, for any
replacement that is done, detailed and open-hole HFEC inspections for
cracks of the modified upper deck floor beams, and corrective actions
if necessary. This AD results from a report from the manufacturer that
the accomplishment of certain existing inspections, repairs, and
modifications is not adequate to ensure the structural integrity of the
affected 7075 series aluminum alloy upper deck floor beam upper chords
on airplanes that have exceeded certain thresholds. We are issuing this
AD to prevent cracking of the upper chords and straps (or angles) of
the floor beams, which could lead to failure of the floor beams and
consequent loss of controllability, rapid decompression, and loss of
structural integrity of the airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective March 11, 2010.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference

of a certain publication listed in the AD as of March 11, 2010.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivan Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
all Model 747-200C and -200F series airplanes. That NPRM was published
in the Federal Register on July 6, 2009 (74 FR 31894). That NPRM
proposed to require a high frequency eddy current inspection for cracks
of certain fastener holes, and corrective action if necessary. That
NPRM also proposed to require repetitive replacements of the upper
chords, straps (or angles), and radius fillers of certain upper deck
floor beams, and, for any replacement that is done, detailed and open-
hole HFEC inspections for cracks of the modified upper deck floor
beams, and corrective actions if necessary.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received from the commenters.

Support for the NPRM

    One commenter, Boeing, agrees with the contents of the NPRM.

Request To Clarify Compliance Time of Modification

    One commenter, Northwest Airlines (NWA), requests that we clarify
whether the modification that is mandated by paragraph (g) of AD 2005-
07-21, Amendment 39-14046 (70 FR 18277, April 11, 2005), is required
during the accomplishment of the initial 15,000-flight-cycle post-upper
chord replacement inspection proposed by the NPRM. NWA notes that the
NPRM would require replacing the upper deck floor beam upper chords
before the accumulation of 21,000 total flight cycles, or within 1,500
flight cycles after the effective date of the AD, whichever is later.
NWA also states that the proposed rule would mandate inspecting the
upper deck floor beams within 15,000 flight cycles after replacement of
the upper chords. NWA notes that the inspections are to be completed in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2429, Revision 2, dated October 16, 2008; and Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2439, Revision 2, dated July 17, 2008.
NWA notes that inspections per Boeing Alert Service Bulletins 747-
53A2429 and 747-53A2439 were previously mandated. NWA points out that
the Manager of the Seattle Aircraft Certification Office has previously
approved the accomplishment of the applicable inspection, repair, and
modification procedures contained in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2696, dated October 16, 2008, as an alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) for paragraphs (f) and (g) of AD 2006-08-02, Amendment 39-14556
(71 FR 18618, April 12, 2006), and the inspection, repair, and
modification requirements of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (e), (g)(1),
(h)(2), (i), (j), (k), and (l) of AD 2005-07-21.
    We agree to provide clarification of the post-upper chord
replacement actions. Paragraph (h) of this final rule requires detailed
and HFEC inspections for cracks of the modified upper deck floor beams,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2696, dated October 16, 2008, within 15,000
flight cycles after the upper chord replacement, or within 1,500 flight
cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later. In
addition, paragraph (h) of this final rule requires a repeat
accomplishment of the upper chord replacement within 6,000 flight
cycles after doing the initial post-upper chord replacement
inspections. Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2696 in turn refers
to Boeing Alert Service Bulletins 747-53A2429, Revision 2; and 747-
53A2439, Revision 2; for inspection procedures only. Therefore, the
modification in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2429, dated March 22, 2001, as mandated by paragraph (g) of AD 2005-
07-21, is not required by this final rule. Operators should note that
accomplishment of the actions per this AD has been approved as an AMOC
to the corresponding requirements of AD 2005-07-21 and AD 2006-08-02 as
described above. We have not changed the final rule in regard to this
issue.

Explanation of Changes Made to This AD

    We have revised this AD to identify the legal name of the
manufacturer as published in the most recent type certificate data
sheet for the affected airplane models.
    Boeing Commercial Airplanes has received an Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA), which replaces their previous
designation as a Delegation Option Authorization (DOA) holder. We have
revised paragraph (j)(3) of this AD to delegate the authority to
approve an alternative method of compliance for any repair required by
this AD to the Boeing Commercial Airplanes ODA.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 25 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this AD.

                                             Table--Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                              Number of
                      Average                                                   U.S.-
    Work hours       labor rate         Parts           Cost per product      registered        Fleet cost
                      per hour                                                airplanes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
663...............          $80  None..............  $53,040 per inspection/          25  $1,326,000 per
                                                      replacement cycle.                   inspection/
                                                                                replacement cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2010-03-05 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-16188. Docket No. FAA-
2009-0608; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-215-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective March 11,
2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 747-200C and
-200F series airplanes, certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53:
Fuselage.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD results from a report from the manufacturer that the
accomplishment of certain existing inspections, repairs, and
modifications is not adequate to ensure the structural integrity of
the affected 7075 series aluminum alloy upper deck floor beam upper
chords on airplanes that have exceeded certain thresholds. We are
issuing this AD to prevent cracking of the upper chords and straps
(or angles) of the floor beams, which could lead to failure of the
floor beams and consequent loss of controllability, rapid
decompression, and loss of structural integrity of the airplane.

Compliance

    (f) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

Initial Inspection and Replacement

    (g) Before the accumulation of 21,000 total flight cycles, or
within 1,500 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later: Do an open-hole high frequency eddy current
(HFEC) inspection of all the fastener holes accessed for upper chord
removal for cracks, and replace the upper chords, straps (or
angles), and radius fillers of the upper deck floor beams, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2696, dated October 16, 2008.

Repetitive Replacements and Post-Replacement Inspections

    (h) Within 15,000 flight cycles after doing the replacement
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, or within 1,500 flight cycles
after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later: Do
detailed and HFEC inspections for cracks of the modified upper deck
floor beams, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2696, dated October 16, 2008.
Within 6,000 flight cycles after doing the detailed and HFEC
inspections, repeat the replacement specified in paragraph (g) of
this AD. Repeat the post-replacement inspections and replacement at
the applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E. of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2696, dated October 16, 2008.

Repair of Cracks

    (i) If any crack is found during any inspection required by this
AD: Before further flight, repair the crack using a method approved
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this
AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (j)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Ivan Li, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
917-6437; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Or, e-mail information to 9-ANM-
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO to make those findings.
For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (k) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2696,
dated October 16, 2008, as applicable, to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 21, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-1690 Filed 2-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: December 27, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 247)]
[Notices]
[Page 73386-73388]
[DOCID:fr27de07-104]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-56982; File No. SR-Amex-2007-79]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change as Modified by Amendments No.
1 and 2 Relating to Independent Directors and Audit Committee Members

December 18, 2007.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 18, 2007, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex'' or
``Exchange''), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been substantially
prepared by Amex. On November 8, 2007, Amex submitted Amendment No. 1
to the proposed rule change.\3\ On November 16, 2007, Amex submitted
Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change.\4\ The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change,
as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Amendment No. 1 replaced and superseded the original filing
in its entirety.
    \4\ Amendment No. 2 replaced and superseded Amendment No. 1 in
its entirety.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend sections 802 and 803 of the Amex
Company Guide (``Company Guide'') in order to modify the cure period
available to a listed issuer that loses an independent director or
audit committee member. In addition, the Exchange proposes to
reorganize sections 121, 126, 801, 802, 803, 804 and 805 of the Company
Guide to consolidate the provisions related to independent director and
audit committee requirements.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at Amex's Office
of the Secretary, at the Commission's Public Reference Room, and on
Amex's Web site at http://www.amex.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, Amex included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. Amex has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Most listed issuers are required to maintain a majority independent
board and an audit committee comprised of at least three independent
directors who

meet the general Amex independence criteria specified in section 121 of
the Company Guide, as well as the audit committee independence
requirements mandated by Rule 10A-3 under the Act \5\ and section 803
of the Company Guide. Section 121B(2)(c) of the Company Guide provides
an exemption for small business issuers (``Small Business Issuers'')
\6\ which states that Small Business Issuers are only required to
maintain a board of directors comprised of at least 50% independent
directors and an audit committee of at least two members, comprised
solely of independent directors who also meet the requirements of Rule
10A-3 under the Act.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 240.10A-3.
    \6\ A ``small business issuer'' is generally defined as a
company whose annual revenue is less than $25 million and whose
``public float'' is less than $25 million. See Item 10(a)(1) of SEC
Regulation S-B (17 CFR 228.10(a)(1)).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.10A-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issuers that lose an independent audit committee member because the
director ceases to be ``independent'' pursuant to Rule 10A-3 of the Act
\8 \or section 121A of the Company Guide for reasons outside his or her
reasonable control are afforded a cure period to replace the
director.\9\ The cure period lasts until the earlier of the company's
next annual shareholders' meeting or one year from the date of the
event that caused the noncompliance and is based on Rule 10A-3(a)(3)
under the Act,\10\ which permits an exchange to provide such a cure
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Id.
    \9\ See Section 803(a) of the Company Guide.
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.10A-3(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, the Company Guide does not provide an explicit cure
period for a listed issuer that fails to comply with the audit
committee requirements due to a vacancy on its audit committee.
Further, the Company Guide does not provide an explicit cure period for
a listed issuer that fails to comply with the majority independent
board requirements due to a vacancy or if a director ceases to be
independent due to circumstances beyond his or her reasonable control.
The Exchange proposes to provide a cure period to apply to situations
in which an issuer becomes non-compliant with the audit committee
requirements due to a vacancy \11\ or the majority independent board
requirements as a result of either (i) a vacancy or (ii) if a director
ceases to be independent due to circumstances beyond his or her
reasonable control.\12\ The proposed rule change would provide that if
the annual shareholders' meeting occurs no later than 180 days
following the event that caused the issuer's failure to comply with the
majority independent board requirement or the audit committee
composition requirement, the listed issuer (other than a Small Business
Issuer) will instead have 180 days from the event to regain
compliance.\13\ The 180-day minimum cure period will help assure
adequate time for companies to conduct an appropriate search process
for a qualified replacement for an independent director or audit
committee member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See proposed Section 803B(6)(b) of the Company Guide.
    \12\ See proposed Section 802(b) of the Company Guide.
    \13\ See proposed Sections 803B(6)(b) and 802(b) of the Company
Guide.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (``Nasdaq'') provides a
similar cure period for its listed issuers with a vacancy on the board
or audit committee,\14\ though Nasdaq does not provide an exemption for
Small Business Issuers. Section 121B(2)(c) of the Company Guide
provides an exemption for Small Business Issuers in that they are only
required to maintain a board of directors comprised of at least 50%
independent directors, and an audit committee of at least two members,
comprised solely of independent directors who also meet the
requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Act.\15\ In the event that a Small
Business Issuer elects to have more than two members on its audit
committee, a vacancy of one of the audit committee members will not
trigger a violation of the audit committee requirements under section
121B(2)(c) of the Company Guide. If, on the other hand, a Small
Business Issuer decides to have only two members on its audit
committee, it becomes imperative that a vacancy on the audit committee
be filled as quickly and efficiently as possible. Thus, in light of the
exemption provided to Small Business Issuers, Amex proposes that if the
annual shareholders' meeting of a Small Business Issuer occurs no later
than 75 days following the event that caused the failure to comply with
the audit committee composition requirement, that such Small Business
Issuer have 75 days from the event to regain compliance.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Nasdaq Rule 4350(d)(4)(B). See also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 54421(September 11, 2006), 71 FR 54698 (September
18, 2006) (SR-NASDAQ-2006-011).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.10A-3.
    \16\ See proposed Section 803B(6)(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Amex also proposes to reorganize sections 121, 126, 801, 802, 803,
804, and 805 of the Company Guide to consolidate the provisions related
to independent director and audit committee requirements.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed changes strike an
appropriate balance between the shareholder protections provided by an
independent board and audit committee and the time that is generally
needed to replace an independent director and/or audit committee
member. Moreover, the Exchange expects the use of the explicit cure
period to provide greater transparency and clarity to the process, as
well as greater uniformity with the corporate governance standards of
other national securities exchanges.
2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b) of the
Act,\17\ in general, and furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(5) of
the Act,\18\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change will impose no burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received by the Exchange on
this proposal.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding, or (ii) as to
which Amex consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.

Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-Amex-2007-79 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2007-79. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Amex. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2007-79 and should be
submitted on or before January 17, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-24987 Filed 12-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62205-62207]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24584]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2005-0022]

T[Uuml]V S[Uuml]D Product Services GmbH: Grant of Expansion of
Recognition

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this notice, OSHA announces its final decision to expand
the scope of recognition for T[Uuml]V S[Uuml]D Product Services GmbH,
as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL).

DATES: The expansion of the scope of recognition becomes effective on
October 16, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information regarding this notice is
available from the following sources:
    Press inquiries: Contact Mr. Frank Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office
of Communications, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue
NW., Room N-3647, Washington, DC 20210; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    General and technical information: Contact Mr. Kevin Robinson,
Office of Technical Programs and Coordination Activities, Directorate
of Technical Support and Emergency Management, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Room N-3655, Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202) 693-
2110; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>OSHA's Web page includes
information about the NRTL Program (see http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/index.html).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Notice of Final Decision

    OSHA hereby gives notice of the expansion of the scope of
recognition of T[Uuml]V S[Uuml]D Product Services GmbH (TUVPSG), as an
NRTL. TUVPSG's expansion covers the addition of one recognized testing
and certification site to its NRTL scope of recognition.
    OSHA recognition of an NRTL signifies that the organization meets
the requirements specified by 29 CFR 1910.7. Recognition is an
acknowledgment that the organization can perform independent safety
testing and certification of the specific products covered within its
scope of recognition, and is not a delegation or grant of government
authority. As a result of recognition, employers may use products
properly approved by the NRTL to meet OSHA standards that require
testing and certification.
    The Agency processes applications by an NRTL for initial
recognition, or for expansion or renewal of this recognition, following
requirements in Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7. This appendix requires
that the Agency publish two notices in the Federal Register in
processing an application. In the first notice, OSHA announces the
application and provides its preliminary finding and, in the second
notice, the Agency provides its final decision on the application.
These notices set forth the NRTL's scope of recognition or
modifications of that scope. OSHA maintains an informational Web page
for each NRTL that details its scope of recognition. These pages are
available from the Agency's Web site at http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/index.html.
    TUVPSG submitted an application, dated February 5, 2013 (OSHA-2005-
0022-0007), to expand its recognition to include the addition of one
recognized testing and certification site located at: TUVPSG Garching,
Daimlerstrasse 11, D-85748 Garching, Germany. OSHA staff performed a
detailed analysis of the application and other pertinent information.
OSHA staff also performed an on-site review of TUVPSG's Garching
testing and certification facility on April 26, 2013, and recommended
expansion of TUVPSG's recognition to include this one site.
    OSHA published the preliminary notice announcing TUVPSG's expansion
application in the Federal Register on May 27, 2014 (79 FR 30181). The
Agency requested comments by June 11, 2014. OSHA received three
comments regarding TUVPSG's request to expand its scope of recognition
(OSHA-2005-0022-0008, OSHA-2005-0022-0009, and OSHA-2005-0022-0010).
    The first anonymous comment (OSHA-2005-0022-0008) asked whether the
decision to expand TUVPSG's scope was good for a local trade union of
construction workers. However, the comment offers no information about
the issue on which OSHA sought comment--TUVPSG's request to expand its
recognition, and OSHA does not consider it further.
    The remaining comments from the National Electrical Manufacturers
Association (NEMA) and the Information Technology Industry Council
(ITI) (OSHA-2005-0022-0009 and OSHA-2005-0022-0010, respectively)
assert that German law requires German conformity assessment bodies,
authorized as GS Bodies, to reside within Germany, and that this
requirement does not provide ``equal treatment'' as outlined in OSHA's
NRTL regulations and policies.
    OSHA's NRTL regulations (29 CFR 1910.7--Appendix A I.A.1.b) require
OSHA to consider, prior to granting initial recognition of
organizations located outside of the United States, ``the policy of the
foreign government regarding both the acceptance in that country of
testing data, equipment acceptances, and listings, and labeling, which
are provided through nationally recognized testing laboratories.., and
the accessibility to government recognition or a similar system in that
country by U.S.-based safety-related testing agencies.'' OSHA conducted
a review of Germany's policies toward U.S.-based testing and
certification organizations in 2001, when TUVPSG was initially
recognized by OSHA as an NRTL. At that time, U.S.-based organizations
were treated no less favorably than other testing and certification
organizations seeking accreditation in Germany. OSHA regulations
require a review of foreign government practices for initial
recognition, and not for renewal or expansion applications, as
requested by TUVPSG. As this is an application for expansion, there is
no basis in OSHA regulations to reconsider how German law treats U.S.-
based testing and certification organizations. However, the information
provided by NEMA and ITI raises questions with respect to the provision
of equal treatment of foreign conformity assessment bodies. As such,
OSHA has requested the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
to review this matter.
    To obtain or review copies of all public documents pertaining to
TUVPSG's application, go to www.regulations.gov or contact the Docket
Office, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department
of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Room N-2625, Washington, DC
20210. Docket No. OSHA-2005-0022 contains all materials in the record
concerning TUVPSG's recognition.

II. Final Decision and Order

    OSHA staff examined TUVPSG's expansion application, conducted a
detailed on-site assessment, and examined other pertinent information.
Based on its review of this evidence, OSHA finds that TUVPSG meets the
requirements of 29 CFR 1910.7 for expansion of its recognition, subject
to the limitation and conditions listed below. OSHA, therefore, is
proceeding with this final notice to grant TUVPSG's scope of
recognition. OSHA limits the expansion of TUVPSG's recognition to
include the site at TUVPSG Garching (Garching, Germany), as listed
above. OSHA's recognition of this site limits TUVPSG to performing
product testing and certifications only to the test standards for which
the site has the proper capability and programs, and for the test
standards in TUVPSG's scope of recognition. This limitation is
consistent with the recognition that OSHA grants to other NRTLs that
operate multiple sites.

A. Conditions

    In addition to those conditions already required by 29 CFR 1910.7,
TUVPSG must abide by the following conditions of the recognition:
    1. TUVPSG must inform OSHA as soon as possible, in writing, of any
change of ownership, facilities, or key personnel, and of any major
change in its operations as an NRTL, and provide details of the
change(s);
    2. TUVPSG must meet all the terms of its recognition and comply
with all OSHA policies pertaining to this recognition; and
    3. TUVPSG must continue to meet the requirements for recognition,
including all previously published conditions on TUVPSG's scope of
recognition, in all areas for which it has recognition.
    Pursuant to the authority in 29 CFR 1910.7, OSHA hereby expands the
recognition of TUVPSG, subject to the limitation and conditions
specified above.

III. Authority and Signature

    David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210, authorized the preparation of this notice.
Accordingly, the Agency is issuing this notice pursuant to 29 U.S.C.
657(g)(2), Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012 (77 FR 3912, Jan. 25,
2012), and 29 CFR 1910.7.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on October 10, 2014.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2014-24584 Filed 10-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 50 (Thursday, March 14, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 9325]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04683]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14227-003]

The Nevada Hydro Company, Inc. ; Notice of Tribal Consultation
Meeting

    a. Date of Meeting: Wednesday, March 20, 2019.
    b. FERC Contact: Jim Fargo,<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    c. Purpose of Meeting: Commission staff will meet with the Pechanga
Band of Luiseno Mission Indians (Pechanga Tribe) at 888 First Street
NE, Washington DC to discuss Nevada Hydro's Corporation's application
to license the proposed Lake Elsinore Advanced Pumped Storage Project
No 14227.
    d. The meeting will be limited to tribal representatives of the
Pechanga Tribe and the Commission's representatives. A summary of the
meeting will be prepared and placed in the public record of these
proceedings.

    Dated: March 7, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-04683 Filed 3-13-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


                           PLASMA 400 ANALYTICAL REPORT

REPORT FOR FILE: 711BA               DATA COLLECTED ON 07/28/ 5 TIME 11:14:16

METHOD FILE: BA                      INTERNAL STANDARD FILE:

ID/WT FILE:

REMARKS:

------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------

BLANK           REPLICATE   1                                  1116 7/28/05

                BA455    EM        51

BLANK           REPLICATE   2

                BA455    EM         6

BLANK           REPLICATE   3

                BA455    EM        23

                BA455    AV      26.7  SD     22.7  CV     85.2 CONC 0.0000

STANDARD #1     REPLICATE   1                                  1117 7/28/05

                BA455    EM        42

STANDARD #1     REPLICATE   2

                BA455    EM        44

STANDARD #1     REPLICATE   3

                BA455    EM        40

                BA455    AV      42.0  SD      2.0  CV      4.8 CONC 0.0500

STANDARD #2     REPLICATE   1                                  1120 7/28/05

                BA455    EM       607

STANDARD #2     REPLICATE   2

                BA455    EM       572

STANDARD #2     REPLICATE   3

                BA455    EM       581

                BA455    AV     586.7  SD     18.2  CV      3.1 CONC 2.0000

ICV             REPLICATE   1                                  1122 7/28/05

                BA455          1.0000

ICV             REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.9392

ICV             REPLICATE   3

                BA455          1.0000

                BA455    AV    0.9797  SD   0.0351  CV     3.58

ICB             REPLICATE   1                                  1123 7/28/05

                BA455          0.0203                  Peak Noisy

ICB             REPLICATE   2

                BA455         -0.0763                  Peak Noisy

ICB             REPLICATE   3

                BA455         -0.0548                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV   -0.0369  SD   0.0507  CV   137.21

ICS             REPLICATE   1                                  1125 7/28/05

                BA455         -0.0191                  Peak Noisy

ICS             REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.0489                  Peak Noisy

ICS             REPLICATE   3

                BA455         -0.0191                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV    0.0036  SD   0.0392  CV  1096.53

50711.LB29      REPLICATE   1                                  1126 7/28/05

                BA455          0.0417                  Peak Noisy

50711.LB29      REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.0632                  Peak Noisy

50711.LB29      REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.0238                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV    0.0429  SD   0.0197  CV    45.89

50711.LCS29     REPLICATE   1                                  1127 7/28/05

                BA455          0.4779

50711.LCS29     REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.4458

50711.LCS29     REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.4708                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV    0.4648  SD   0.0169  CV     3.64

50711.B-1       REPLICATE   1                                  1130 7/28/05

                BA455          0.0453                  Peak Noisy

50711.B-1       REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.0310                  Peak Noisy

50711.B-1       REPLICATE   3

                BA455         -0.0012

                BA455    AV    0.0250  SD   0.0238  CV    95.11

50711.1-1       REPLICATE   1                                  1132 7/28/05

                BA455          0.0453                  Peak Noisy

50711.1-1       REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.0489                  Peak Noisy

50711.1-1       REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.7711

                BA455    AV    0.2884  SD   0.4180  CV   144.93

50711.1-1       REPLICATE   1                                  1133 7/28/05

                BA455          0.0131                  Peak Noisy

50711.1-1       REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.0167                  Peak Noisy

50711.1-1       REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.0131                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV    0.0143  SD   0.0021  CV    14.43

1-1 SPK         REPLICATE   1                                  1135 7/28/05

                BA455          1.0214

1-1 SPK         REPLICATE   2

                BA455          1.0500

1-1 SPK         REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.9177

                BA455    AV    0.9964  SD   0.0696  CV     6.99

2-1             REPLICATE   1                                  1136 7/28/05

                BA455         -0.0656                  Peak Noisy

2-1             REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.0381                  Peak Noisy

2-1             REPLICATE   3

                BA455         -0.0048                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV   -0.0107  SD   0.0521  CV   485.79

3-1             REPLICATE   1                                  1138 7/28/05

                BA455          0.0238                  Peak Noisy

3-1             REPLICATE   2

                BA455         -0.0155                  Peak Noisy

3-1             REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.0060                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV    0.0048  SD   0.0197  CV   412.94

B-2A            REPLICATE   1                                  1139 7/28/05

                BA455          0.0203                  Peak Noisy

B-2A            REPLICATE   2

                BA455         -0.0191                  Window Edge

B-2A            REPLICATE   3

                BA455         -0.0727                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV   -0.0238  SD   0.0467  CV   195.78

CCV             REPLICATE   1                                  1141 7/28/05

                BA455          0.9213

CCV             REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.9606

CCV             REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.9177

                BA455    AV    0.9332  SD   0.0238  CV     2.55

CCB             REPLICATE   1                                  1143 7/28/05

                BA455         -0.0620                  Peak Noisy

CCB             REPLICATE   2

                BA455         -0.0119                  Peak Noisy

CCB             REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.0060                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV   -0.0226  SD   0.0352  CV   155.52

1-2A            REPLICATE   1                                  1144 7/28/05

                BA455         -0.0584                  Peak Noisy

1-2A            REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.0095                  Peak Noisy

1-2A            REPLICATE   3

                BA455         -0.0262                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV   -0.0250  SD   0.0340  CV   135.78

1-2A SPK        REPLICATE   1                                  1145 7/28/05

                BA455          1.0536

1-2A SPK        REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.8748

1-2A SPK        REPLICATE   3

                BA455          1.0500

                BA455    AV    0.9928  SD   0.1022  CV    10.29

2-2A            REPLICATE   1                                  1147 7/28/05

                BA455         -0.0119                  Peak Noisy

2-2A            REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.3599                  Peak Noisy

2-2A            REPLICATE   3

                BA455         -0.0119                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV    0.1120  SD   0.2147  CV   191.63

3-2A            REPLICATE   1                                  1148 7/28/05

                BA455          0.0095                  Window Edge

3-2A            REPLICATE   2

                BA455         -0.0226                  Peak Noisy

3-2A            REPLICATE   3

                BA455         -0.0405                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV   -0.0179  SD   0.0254  CV   141.90

LB-P            REPLICATE   1                                  1149 7/28/05

                BA455          0.0417                  Peak Noisy

LB-P            REPLICATE   2

                BA455         -0.0191                  Peak Noisy

LB-P            REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.0167                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV    0.0131  SD   0.0305  CV   232.99

LCS-P           REPLICATE   1                                  1151 7/28/05

                BA455          0.3564

LCS-P           REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.6603                  Peak Noisy

LCS-P           REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.4350

                BA455    AV    0.4839  SD   0.1577  CV    32.60

LCS-P           REPLICATE   1                                  1152 7/28/05

                BA455          0.4672

LCS-P           REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.4386

LCS-P           REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.4136

                BA455    AV    0.4398  SD   0.0268  CV     6.10

11              REPLICATE   1                                  1154 7/28/05

                BA455          0.5638

11              REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.5351

11              REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.5745

                BA455    AV    0.5578  SD   0.0203  CV     3.65

11 S            REPLICATE   1                                  1155 7/28/05

                BA455          1.6471

11 S            REPLICATE   2

                BA455          1.6007

11 S            REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.4136

                BA455    AV    1.2205  SD   0.6992  CV    57.29

CCV             REPLICATE   1                                  1157 7/28/05

                BA455          1.1108

CCV             REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.8927

CCV             REPLICATE   3

                BA455          1.0429

                BA455    AV    1.0155  SD   0.1116  CV    10.99

CCB             REPLICATE   1                                  1159 7/28/05

                BA455         -0.0012                  Peak Noisy

CCB             REPLICATE   2

                BA455         -0.0405                  Peak Noisy

CCB             REPLICATE   3

                BA455         -0.0262                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV   -0.0226  SD   0.0199  CV    87.92

12              REPLICATE   1                                  1201 7/28/05

                BA455          0.5530

12              REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.6388

12              REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.6710                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV    0.6210  SD   0.0610  CV     9.82

12D             REPLICATE   1                                  1202 7/28/05

                BA455          0.6102

12D             REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.5888

12D             REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.5888

                BA455    AV    0.5959  SD   0.0124  CV     2.08

13              REPLICATE   1                                  1203 7/28/05

                BA455          0.6067

13              REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.5781

13              REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.5781

                BA455    AV    0.5876  SD   0.0165  CV     2.81

21              REPLICATE   1                                  1205 7/28/05

                BA455          0.6102

21              REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.6388

21              REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.6174

                BA455    AV    0.6222  SD   0.0149  CV     2.39

21S             REPLICATE   1                                  1206 7/28/05

                BA455          1.5327

21S             REPLICATE   2

                BA455          1.5613

21S             REPLICATE   3

                BA455          1.4541

                BA455    AV    1.5160  SD   0.0555  CV     3.66

22              REPLICATE   1                                  1207 7/28/05

                BA455          0.5316

22              REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.5173

22              REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.5924

                BA455    AV    0.5471  SD   0.0399  CV     7.29

22D             REPLICATE   1                                  1209 7/28/05

                BA455          0.5602

22D             REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.6317

22D             REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.5351

                BA455    AV    0.5757  SD   0.0501  CV     8.70

23              REPLICATE   1                                  1210 7/28/05

                BA455          0.5173

23              REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.5459

23              REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.5995

                BA455    AV    0.5542  SD   0.0417  CV     7.53

31              REPLICATE   1                                  1211 7/28/05

                BA455          0.6531

31              REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.6460

31              REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.7354

                BA455    AV    0.6782  SD   0.0497  CV     7.32

CCV             REPLICATE   1                                  1213 7/28/05

                BA455          1.0286

CCV             REPLICATE   2

                BA455          1.0214

CCV             REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.9821

                BA455    AV    1.0107  SD   0.0250  CV     2.48

CCB             REPLICATE   1                                  1215 7/28/05

                BA455         -0.0262                  Peak Noisy

CCB             REPLICATE   2

                BA455         -0.0834                  Peak Noisy

CCB             REPLICATE   3

                BA455         -0.0191                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV   -0.0429  SD   0.0353  CV    82.22

CCB             REPLICATE   1                                  1216 7/28/05

                BA455          0.0024                  Peak Noisy

CCB             REPLICATE   2

                BA455         -0.0334

CCB             REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.0095                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV   -0.0071  SD   0.0230  CV   321.52

31 S            REPLICATE   1                                  1217 7/28/05

                BA455          1.6471

31 S            REPLICATE   2

                BA455          1.5506

31 S            REPLICATE   3

                BA455          1.6042

                BA455    AV    1.6007  SD   0.0484  CV     3.02

32              REPLICATE   1                                  1219 7/28/05

                BA455          0.5924

32              REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.6853

32              REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.6817

                BA455    AV    0.6531  SD   0.0527  CV     8.06

32D             REPLICATE   1                                  1221 7/28/05

                BA455          0.6710

32D             REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.7390

32D             REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.7568

                BA455    AV    0.7223  SD   0.0453  CV     6.27

33              REPLICATE   1                                  1222 7/28/05

                BA455          0.6925

33              REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.7962

33              REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.7676

                BA455    AV    0.7521  SD   0.0536  CV     7.12

41 X 5          REPLICATE   1                                  1224 7/28/05

                BA455          0.3492

41 X 5          REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.3671

41 X 5          REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.3635

                BA455    AV    0.3599  SD   0.0095  CV     2.63

41 S X 5        REPLICATE   1                                  1225 7/28/05

                BA455          0.5852

41 S X 5        REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.5888

41 S X 5        REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.6245

                BA455    AV    0.5995  SD   0.0217  CV     3.63

42 X 5          REPLICATE   1                                  1227 7/28/05

                BA455          0.4994

42 X 5          REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.4994

42 X 5          REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.4100

                BA455    AV    0.4696  SD   0.0516  CV    10.99

42D X 5         REPLICATE   1                                  1229 7/28/05

                BA455          0.4422

42D X 5         REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.4100

42D X 5         REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.4350

                BA455    AV    0.4291  SD   0.0169  CV     3.94

43 X 5          REPLICATE   1                                  1231 7/28/05

                BA455          0.4207

43 X 5          REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.3528

43 X 5          REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.3635

                BA455    AV    0.3790  SD   0.0365  CV     9.64

CCV             REPLICATE   1                                  1234 7/28/05

                BA455          0.9642

CCV             REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.9606

CCV             REPLICATE   3

                BA455          0.9749

                BA455    AV    0.9666  SD   0.0074  CV     0.77

CCB             REPLICATE   1                                  1238 7/28/05

                BA455         -0.0191                  Peak Noisy

CCB             REPLICATE   2

                BA455          0.0524                  Peak Noisy

CCB             REPLICATE   3

                BA455         -0.0405                  Peak Noisy

                BA455    AV   -0.0024  SD   0.0487  CV  2043.28