$ 64,188 $ 867,079 Chic Solid LA $ 32,345,586 $ 1,715,488 $ 348,235 $ 50,759 $ 243,579 Swin Evapor FF $ 108,469 $ 150,883 $ 84,495 $ 3,971 $ 35,289 Swin Evapor GF $ 111,079 $ 154,573 $ 86,411 $ 4,055 $ 36,036 Swin Liquid FF $ 4,597,119 $ 1,176,700 $ 477,480 $ 27,019 $ 197,172 Swin Liquid GF $ 3,668,498 $ 897,851 $ 357,309 $ 20,947 $ 150,160 Swin Pit FF $ 93,440 $ 980,290 $ 485,378 $ 25,942 $ 208,095 Swin Pit GF $ 125,906 $ 1,317,036 $ 643,988 $ 35,182 $ 276,868 Turk Solid SL $ 30,458,950 $ 1,603,463 $ 658,423 $ 25,981 $ 431,380 Option 2 Animal Type Manure Type Operation Type Capital Annual Fixed 3 Year Recurring 5 Year Recurring Chic Liquid LW $ 13,973,304 $ 1,463,489 $ 138,625 $ 21,729 $ 90,529 Chic Solid BR $ 84,021,646 $ 3,406,773 $ 1,864,429 $ 71,074 $ 958,713 Chic Solid LA $ 32,320,857 $ 1,896,668 $ 324,297 $ 46,202 $ 219,660 Swin Evapor FF $ 109,178 $ 151,259 $ 128,481 $ 8,947 $ 79,291 Swin Evapor GF $ 112,082 $ 155,296 $ 131,848 $ 9,180 $ 81,339 Swin Liquid FF $ 5,634,404 $ 1,200,428 $ 821,738 $ 72,010 $ 6,479,157 Swin Liquid GF $ 4,443,185 $ 915,513 $ 605,426 $ 54,106 $ 5,023,542 Swin Pit FF $ 98,648 $ 13,019,560 $ 829,828 $ 66,532 $ 552,418 Swin Pit GF $ 132,604 $ 19,073,594 $ 1,091,786 $ 88,524 $ 724,830 Turk Solid SL $ 30,569,896 $ 2,767,751 $ 783,724 $ 33,539 $ 556,494 Option 5 Animal Type Manure Type Operation Type Capital Annual Fixed 3 Year Recurring 5 Year Recurring Chic Liquid LW $ 20,894,044 $ 1,631,407 $ 193,572 $ 34,923 $ 145,476 Chic Solid BR $ 168,090,877 $ 3,406,773 $ 1,864,429 $ 71,074 $ 958,713 Chic Solid LA $ 32,320,857 $ 1,896,668 $ 324,297 $ 46,202 $ 219,660 Swin Evapor FF $ 43,482,982 $ 1,830,329 $ 138,479 $ 10,081 $ 89,297 Swin Evapor GF $ 44,603,923 $ 1,877,640 $ 142,103 $ 10,343 $ 91,602 Swin Liquid FF $ 305,977,691 $ 9,408,523 $ 891,312 $ 81,633 $ 595,532 Swin Liquid GF $ 233,292,787 $ 7,179,779 $ 656,572 $ 61,363 $ 436,415 Swin Pit FF $ 29,813,385 $ 11,253,733 $ 829,828 $ 66,532 $ 552,418 Swin Pit GF $ 40,452,440 $ 17,183,464 $ 1,091,786 $ 88,524 $ 724,830 Turk Solid SL $ 30,569,896 $ 2,767,751 $ 783,724 $ 33,539 $ 556,494 Option 6 Animal Type Manure Type Operation Type Capital Annual Fixed 3 Year Recurring 5 Year Recurring Chic Liquid LW Chic Solid BR Chic Solid LA Swin Evapor FF Swin Evapor GF Swin Liquid FF Swin Liquid GF Swin Pit FF Swin Pit GF Turk Solid SL Option 7 Animal Type Manure Type Operation Type Capital Annual Fixed 3 Year Recurring 5 Year Recurring Chic Liquid LW $ 13,973,304 $ 1,463,489 $ 138,625 $ 21,729 $ 90,529 Chic Solid BR $ 84,021,646 $ 3,406,773 $ 1,864,429 $ 71,074 $ 958,713 Chic Solid LA $ 32,320,857 $ 1,896,668 $ 324,297 $ 46,202 $ 219,660 Swin Evapor FF $ 109,178 $ 151,259 $ 128,481 $ 8,947 $ 79,291 Swin Evapor GF $ 112,082 $ 155,296 $ 131,848 $ 9,180 $ 81,339 Swin Liquid FF $ 11,937,643 $ 1,325,348 $ 821,738 $ 72,010 $ 6,479,157 Swin Liquid GF $ 9,142,922 $ 1,008,657 $ 605,426 $ 54,106 $ 5,023,542 Swin Pit FF $ 98,648 $ 13,019,560 $ 829,828 $ 66,532 $ 552,418 Swin Pit GF $ 132,604 $ 19,073,594 $ 1,091,786 $ 88,524 $ 724,830 Turk Solid SL $ 30,569,896 $ 2,767,751 $ 783,724 $ 33,539 $ 556,494 Option 3A/ 3B Animal Type Manure Type Operation Type Capital Annual Fixed 3 Year Recurring 5 Year Recurring Chic Liquid LW $ 19,886,834 $ 2,440,318 $ 138,399 $ 21,714 $ 797,888 Chic Solid BR $ 100,606,519 $ 7,491,380 $ 1,864,429 $ 71,074 $ 5,988,537 Chic Solid LA $ 39,445,497 $ 3,715,234 $ 324,297 $ 46,202 $ 1,987,750 Swin Evapor FF $ 5,665,734 $ 604,887 $ 128,577 $ 8,952 $ 398,471 Swin Evapor GF $ 5,736,620 $ 620,038 $ 131,923 $ 9,185 $ 408,163 Swin Liquid FF $ 48,295,859 $ 4,452,967 $ 822,422 $ 72,069 $ 8,965,368 Swin Liquid GF $ 36,722,433 $ 3,375,152 $ 605,187 $ 54,110 $ 6,920,325 Swin Pit FF $ 8,163,278 $ 15,418,477 $ 829,421 $ 66,493 $ 2,546,860 Swin Pit GF $ 10,948,432 $ 22,308,089 $ 1,092,402 $ 88,582 $ 3,413,199 Turk Solid SL $ 36,542,048 $ 4,408,738 $ 783,829 $ 33,545 $ 1,753,031 Option 3C/ 3D Animal Type Manure Type Operation Type Capital Annual Fixed 3 Year Recurring 5 Year Recurring Chic Liquid LW $ 19,283,867 $ 2,433,491 $ 138,399 $ 21,684 $ 90,399 Chic Solid BR $ 100,606,519 $ 7,491,380 $ 1,864,429 $ 71,074 $ 958,713 Chic Solid LA $ 39,445,497 $ 3,715,234 $ 324,297 $ 46,202 $ 219,660 Swin Evapor FF $ 1,449,965 $ 547,631 $ 128,481 $ 8,947 $ 79,291 Swin Evapor GF $ 1,488,809 $ 562,604 $ 131,848 $ 9,180 $ 81,339 Swin Liquid FF $ 40,530,065 $ 4,354,393 $ 821,950 $ 72,035 $ 6,483,590 Swin Liquid GF $ 30,935,609 $ 3,307,366 $ 605,865 $ 54,162 $ 5,027,517 Swin Pit FF $ 8,165,789 $ 15,446,447 $ 829,455 $ 66,505 $ 552,077 Swin Pit GF $ 10,946,152 $ 22,289,670 $ 1,092,062 $ 88,529 $ 724,998 Turk Solid SL $ 36,512,531 $ 4,405,654 $ 784,039 $ 33,552 $ 556,713 Model Farm Costs for All Options Option Animal Farm Type Manure Type Size Class Region Category Performance Needs Number of Facilities Capital Costs Fixed Costs Annual O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Option 6 costs are only calculated for swine operations. For all other model farms Options 2 costs should be used. Model Farm Costs for All Options Option Animal Farm Type Manure Type Size Class Region Category Performance Needs Number of Facilities Capital Costs Fixed Costs Annual O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Option 6 costs are only calculated for swine operations. For all other model farms Options 2 costs should be used. Model Farm Costs for All Options Option Animal Farm Type Manure Type Size Class Region Category Performance Needs Number of Facilities Capital Costs Fixed Costs Annual O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Option 6 costs are only calculated for swine operations. For all other model farms Options 2 costs should be used. Model Farm Costs for All Options Option Animal Farm Type Manure Type Size Class Region Category Performance Needs Number of Facilities Capital Costs Fixed Costs Annual O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Option 6 costs are only calculated for swine operations. For all other model farms Options 2 costs should be used. Model Farm Costs for All Options Option Animal Farm Type Manure Type Size Class Region Category Performance Needs Number of Facilities Capital Costs Fixed Costs Annual O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Option 6 costs are only calculated for swine operations. For all other model farms Options 2 costs should be used. Model Farm Costs for All Options Option Animal Farm Type Manure Type Size Class Region Category Performance Needs Number of Facilities Capital Costs Fixed Costs Annual O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs 3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 SO 1 L 1.6 26,092 $ 1,427 $ 11,846 $ 679 $ 1,273 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 SO 1 L 2.8 37,429 $ 1,462 $ 15,095 $ 637 $ 1,194 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 MA 1 L 2.1 30,862 $ 6,925 $ 12,976 $ 564 $ 5,817 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 MA 1 L 3.6 44,147 $ 6,786 $ 16,809 $ 472 $ 4,885 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large2 CE 1 L 3.1 29,342 $

$ 8,820 $ 310 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large1 CE 1 L 4.3 40,700 $

$ 12,234 $ 174 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MA 1 L 1.8 16,091 $

$ 4,837 $ 318 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MA 1 L 2.5 23,663 $

$ 7,113 $ 173 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MA 1 L 5.6 228,843 $

$ 15,932 $ 867 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MA 1 L 7.8 170,771 $

$ 22,191 $ 451 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MW 1 L 25.0 236,625 $

$ 71,125 $ 3,222 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MW 1 L 34.8 330,329 $

$ 99,291 $ 2,148 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MW 1 L 19.3 720,679 $

$ 54,909 $ 2,271 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MW 1 L 26.9 626,553 $

$ 76,531 $ 1,529 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large2 CE 1 L 3.2 30,288 $

$ 9,104 $ 320 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large1 CE 1 L 4.4 41,646 $

$ 12,518 $ 178 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MA 1 L 2.8 26,502 $

$ 7,966 $ 524 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MA 1 L 3.9 36,914 $

$ 11,096 $ 271 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MA 1 L 4.7 202,741 $

$ 13,372 $ 728 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MA 1 L 6.6 145,564 $

$ 18,777 $ 381 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MW 1 L 32.1 303,827 $

$ 91,325 $ 4,137 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MW 1 L 44.7 423,086 $

$ 127,172 $ 2,751 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MW 1 L 13.3 502,487 $

$ 37,839 $ 1,565 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MW 1 L 18.5 435,082 $

$ 52,917 $ 1,057 $

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 MW 1 L 7.5 133,050 $

$ 28,313 $ 4,202 $

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 MW 1 L 1.1 37,186 $

$ 5,876 $ 1,812 $

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 SO 1 L 3.3 85,572 $

$ 12,458 $ 2,135 $

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 SO 1 L 0.3 17,369 $

$ 1,603 $ 571 $

$

3C/ 3D Chic Liquid LW Large1 SO 1 L 7.1 103,691 $

$ 21,485 $ 1,856 $

$

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MA 1 L 1.2 39,432 $ 8,124 $ 10,048 $ 395 $ 7,030 $

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MW 1 L 1.7 54,203 $ 10,329 $ 13,384 $ 464 $ 8,697 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 SO 2 L 72.8 817,194 $ 14,766 $ 320,029 $ 4,159 $ 7,777 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 SO 2 L 126.0 1,343,019 $ 20,248 $ 468,711 $ 4,319 $ 8,152 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 MA 2 L 31.1 381,218 $ 41,838 $ 148,495 $ 2,467 $ 25,417 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 MA 2 L 53.8 596,501 $ 53,998 $ 211,398 $ 2,484 $ 25,591 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large2 CE 2 L 7.0 66,255 $

$ 19,915 $ 1,029 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large1 CE 2 L 9.7 91,811 $

$ 27,597 $ 474 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MA 2 L 10.3 97,490 $

$ 769,350 $ 1,134 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MA 2 L 14.3 135,350 $

$ 383,912 $ 523 $

$

Option 6 costs are only calculated for swine operations. For all other model farms Options 2 costs should be used. Model Farm Costs for All Options Option Animal Farm Type Manure Type Size Class Region Category Performance Needs Number of Facilities Capital Costs Fixed Costs Annual O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs 3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MA 2 L 32.7 2,072,084 $

$ 104,413 $ 3,601 $ 441,167 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MA 2 L 45.6 1,437,663 $

$ 137,288 $ 1,669 $ 205,503 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MW 2 L 24.9 235,679 $

$ 335,066 $ 5,043 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MW 2 L 34.7 328,436 $

$ 204,988 $ 2,217 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MW 2 L 19.2 1,079,481 $

$ 60,132 $ 3,889 $ 127,987 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MW 2 L 26.8 740,029 $

$ 79,794 $ 1,712 $ 54,255 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large2 CE 2 L 7.2 68,148 $

$ 20,484 $ 1,058 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large1 CE 2 L 10.0 94,650 $

$ 28,450 $ 489 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MA 2 L 16.5 156,173 $

$ 1,256,372 $ 1,817 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MA 2 L 23.0 217,695 $

$ 628,614 $ 842 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MA 2 L 27.5 1,753,292 $

$ 87,809 $ 3,029 $ 371,012 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MA 2 L 38.4 1,212,622 $

$ 115,611 $ 1,405 $ 173,055 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MW 2 L 32.0 302,880 $

$ 471,471 $ 6,482 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MW 2 L 44.6 422,139 $

$ 281,353 $ 2,849 $

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MW 2 L 13.2 752,282 $

$ 41,654 $ 2,694 $ 88,658 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MW 2 L 18.5 512,723 $

$ 55,081 $ 1,182 $ 37,452 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 MW 2 L 45.7 810,718 $

$ 172,518 $ 777 $

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 MW 2 L 7.0 236,635 $

$ 37,394 $ 147 $

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 SO 2 L 27.5 713,103 $

$ 103,813 $ 468 $

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 SO 2 L 2.9 167,901 $

$ 15,492 $ 61 $

$

3C/ 3D Chic Liquid LW Large1 SO 2 L 43.0 576,174 $

$ 129,815 $ 2,977 $

$

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MA 2 L 23.8 710,859 $ 71,164 $ 155,538 $ 2,777 $ 49,459 $

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MW 2 L 32.8 973,591 $ 103,230 $ 213,895 $ 3,827 $ 71,742 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 SO 3 L 26.4 262,395 $

$ 102,749 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 SO 3 L 45.7 441,950 $

$ 154,557 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 MA 3 L 15.4 170,466 $

$ 64,782 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 MA 3 L 26.7 272,975 $

$ 94,443 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large2 CE 3 L 4.0 37,860 $

$ 11,380 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large1 CE 3 L 5.5 52,058 $

$ 15,648 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MA 3 L 3.0 29,342 $

$ 310,011 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MA 3 L 4.2 39,753 $

$ 132,813 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MA 3 L 9.6 687,449 $

$ 27,312 $

$ 165,231 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MA 3 L 13.3 399,999 $

$ 38,123 $

$ 68,308 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MW 3 L 20.9 197,819 $

$ 905,070 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MW 3 L 29.1 275,432 $

$ 398,379 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MW 3 L 16.1 1,409,961 $

$ 46,089 $

$ 310,671 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MW 3 L 22.5 734,543 $

$ 64,013 $

$ 115,655 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large2 CE 3 L 4.1 38,807 $

$ 11,665 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large1 CE 3 L 5.7 53,951 $

$ 16,217 $

$

$

Option 6 costs are only calculated for swine operations. For all other model farms Options 2 costs should be used. Model Farm Costs for All Options Option Animal Farm Type Manure Type Size Class Region Category Performance Needs Number of Facilities Capital Costs Fixed Costs Annual O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs 3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MA 3 L 4.8 45,432 $

$ 480,017 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MA 3 L 6.7 63,416 $

$ 211,869 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MA 3 L 8.1 573,821 $

$ 23,045 $

$ 139,414 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MA 3 L 11.2 336,415 $

$ 32,149 $

$ 57,603 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MW 3 L 26.8 253,662 $

$ 1,160,569 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MW 3 L 37.4 353,991 $

$ 512,006 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MW 3 L 11.1 955,134 $

$ 31,580 $

$ 212,867 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MW 3 L 15.5 501,826 $

$ 44,098 $

$ 79,673 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 MW 3 L 48.5 860,390 $

$ 183,088 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 MW 3 L 7.4 250,157 $

$ 39,531 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 SO 3 L 28.1 728,661 $

$ 106,078 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 SO 3 L 2.9 167,901 $

$ 15,492 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Liquid LW Large1 SO 3 L 45.6 679,191 $

$ 137,986 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MA 3 L 15.8 435,659 $

$ 86,146 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MW 3 L 21.7 601,915 $

$ 119,068 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 SO 1 M 3.2 298,367 $ 28,199 $ 25,908 $ 1,528 $ 25,163 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 SO 1 M 5.5 292,075 $ 28,391 $ 33,193 $ 1,407 $ 23,173 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 MA 1 M 4.2 65,204 $ 24,753 $ 28,403 $ 1,267 $ 20,792 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 MA 1 M 7.2 91,995 $ 24,255 $ 37,487 $ 1,067 $ 17,460 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large2 CE 1 M 6.2 63,308 $ 9,874 $ 20,324 $ 695 $ 6,528 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large1 CE 1 M 8.6 85,518 $ 8,326 $ 28,148 $ 394 $ 3,688 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MA 1 M 3.5 33,260 $ 1,754 $ 10,847 $ 738 $ 1,376 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MA 1 M 4.9 46,549 $ 1,238 $ 15,185 $ 382 $ 714 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MA 1 M 11.2 464,990 $ 4,851 $ 35,331 $ 1,955 $ 3,641 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MA 1 M 15.6 340,114 $ 3,579 $ 48,714 $ 1,022 $ 1,910 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MW 1 M 50.0 476,730 $ 94,654 $ 162,924 $ 7,243 $ 67,708 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MW 1 M 69.6 662,801 $ 82,539 $ 227,244 $ 4,795 $ 44,955 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MW 1 M 38.6 1,420,937 $ 68,762 $ 129,279 $ 5,116 $ 47,864 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MW 1 M 53.8 1,220,210 $ 61,078 $ 177,709 $ 3,422 $ 32,026 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large2 CE 1 M 6.3 64,329 $ 10,033 $ 20,651 $ 707 $ 6,633 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large1 CE 1 M 8.9 88,502 $ 8,616 $ 29,130 $ 408 $ 3,816 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MA 1 M 5.7 53,216 $ 2,807 $ 17,354 $ 1,181 $ 2,202 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MA 1 M 7.9 75,048 $ 1,996 $ 24,482 $ 616 $ 1,150 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MA 1 M 9.4 379,793 $ 4,071 $ 29,638 $ 1,641 $ 3,056 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MA 1 M 13.1 283,348 $ 3,005 $ 40,904 $ 858 $ 1,604 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MW 1 M 64.1 613,348 $ 121,780 $ 209,613 $ 9,319 $ 87,112 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MW 1 M 89.4 852,309 $ 106,139 $ 292,218 $ 6,167 $ 57,809 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MW 1 M 26.6 967,076 $ 47,085 $ 88,510 $ 3,503 $ 32,775 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MW 1 M 37.1 839,018 $ 42,006 $ 122,216 $ 2,353 $ 22,026 $

Option 6 costs are only calculated for swine operations. For all other model farms Options 2 costs should be used. Model Farm Costs for All Options Option Animal Farm Type Manure Type Size Class Region Category Performance Needs Number of Facilities Capital Costs Fixed Costs Annual O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs 3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 MW 1 M 15.0 640,157 $ 19,257 $ 67,766 $ 9,452 $ 17,637 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 MW 1 M 2.3 245,843 $ 8,204 $ 14,613 $ 4,261 $ 7,956 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 SO 1 M 6.7 402,691 $

$ 33,869 $ 4,872 $

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 SO 1 M 0.7 110,517 $

$ 5,539 $ 1,497 $

$

3C/ 3D Chic Liquid LW Large1 SO 1 M 14.2 206,840 $

$ 54,733 $ 4,141 $

$

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MA 1 M 2.4 226,190 $ 17,088 $ 23,508 $ 888 $ 14,786 $

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MW 1 M 3.4 317,747 $ 20,658 $ 31,651 $ 1,044 $ 17,394 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 SO 2 M 145.7 16,104,314 $ 291,941 $ 745,548 $ 9,343 $ 153,734 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 SO 2 M 251.9 13,490,588 $ 399,295 $ 1,099,526 $ 9,786 $ 160,387 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 MA 2 M 62.2 822,994 $ 149,573 $ 335,203 $ 5,550 $ 90,857 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 MA 2 M 107.5 1,249,055 $ 192,760 $ 480,239 $ 5,597 $ 91,280 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large2 CE 2 M 14.0 145,846 $ 29,234 $ 45,953 $ 2,312 $ 21,683 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large1 CE 2 M 19.5 195,406 $ 20,608 $ 63,850 $ 1,073 $ 10,090 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MA 2 M 20.5 195,831 $ 6,975 $ 1,543,933 $ 2,550 $ 4,771 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MA 2 M 28.6 272,679 $ 5,296 $ 777,779 $ 1,194 $ 2,225 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MA 2 M 65.4 3,948,595 $ 22,177 $ 226,711 $ 8,107 $ 898,853 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MA 2 M 91.2 2,693,298 $ 16,829 $ 297,408 $ 3,793 $ 418,076 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MW 2 M 49.8 477,886 $ 133,005 $ 691,109 $ 11,313 $ 106,124 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MW 2 M 69.4 661,247 $ 84,485 $ 439,124 $ 5,040 $ 47,064 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MW 2 M 38.5 2,044,845 $ 102,825 $ 138,501 $ 8,746 $ 338,685 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MW 2 M 53.7 1,387,595 $ 65,372 $ 182,875 $ 3,900 $ 145,128 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large2 CE 2 M 14.3 148,971 $ 29,861 $ 46,938 $ 2,361 $ 22,148 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large1 CE 2 M 20.0 200,417 $ 21,136 $ 65,487 $ 1,101 $ 10,349 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MA 2 M 33.0 313,709 $ 11,173 $ 2,521,125 $ 4,085 $ 7,642 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MA 2 M 46.0 437,996 $ 8,507 $ 1,271,639 $ 1,917 $ 3,574 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MA 2 M 55.0 3,325,654 $ 18,656 $ 190,720 $ 6,820 $ 756,134 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MA 2 M 76.7 2,271,676 $ 14,172 $ 250,454 $ 3,194 $ 352,064 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MW 2 M 63.9 613,192 $ 170,663 $ 968,385 $ 14,517 $ 136,171 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MW 2 M 89.1 848,950 $ 108,467 $ 599,428 $ 6,470 $ 60,423 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MW 2 M 26.5 1,406,536 $ 70,776 $ 95,329 $ 6,020 $ 233,121 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MW 2 M 36.9 953,684 $ 44,921 $ 125,663 $ 2,680 $ 99,725 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 MW 2 M 91.4 3,895,834 $ 12,979 $ 430,914 $ 1,737 $ 3,199 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 MW 2 M 13.9 1,483,505 $ 2,127 $ 91,061 $ 334 $ 626 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 SO 2 M 54.9 3,250,904 $

$ 267,516 $ 1,043 $

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 SO 2 M 5.7 884,817 $

$ 38,499 $ 137 $

$

3C/ 3D Chic Liquid LW Large1 SO 2 M 85.9 7,601,375 $

$ 767,222 $ 6,677 $

$

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MA 2 M 47.6 4,343,691 $ 149,654 $ 694,834 $ 6,235 $ 104,006 $

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MW 2 M 65.6 5,995,323 $ 206,775 $ 696,662 $ 8,606 $ 143,703 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 SO 3 M 52.9 5,987,963 $

$ 244,250 $

$

$

Option 6 costs are only calculated for swine operations. For all other model farms Options 2 costs should be used. Model Farm Costs for All Options Option Animal Farm Type Manure Type Size Class Region Category Performance Needs Number of Facilities Capital Costs Fixed Costs Annual O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs 3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 SO 3 M 91.4 4,718,686 $

$ 368,068 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 MA 3 M 30.9 369,391 $

$ 149,031 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 MA 3 M 53.4 564,887 $

$ 216,900 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large2 CE 3 M 7.9 89,159 $

$ 26,070 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large1 CE 3 M 11.1 112,077 $

$ 36,375 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MA 3 M 6.0 56,862 $

$ 601,546 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MA 3 M 8.4 78,601 $

$ 264,567 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MA 3 M 19.1 1,316,485 $

$ 61,061 $

$ 328,742 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MA 3 M 26.7 769,136 $

$ 83,689 $

$ 136,106 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MW 3 M 41.7 401,763 $

$ 1,823,433 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MW 3 M 58.2 552,612 $

$ 819,791 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MW 3 M 32.3 2,732,908 $

$ 111,607 $

$ 617,506 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MW 3 M 45.0 1,431,160 $

$ 149,763 $

$ 231,309 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large2 CE 3 M 8.1 91,416 $

$ 26,730 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large1 CE 3 M 11.3 114,096 $

$ 37,030 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MA 3 M 9.7 91,927 $

$ 972,499 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MA 3 M 13.5 127,845 $

$ 430,321 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MA 3 M 16.1 1,125,614 $

$ 51,493 $

$ 277,107 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MA 3 M 22.5 644,152 $

$ 70,210 $

$ 114,186 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MW 3 M 53.6 516,415 $

$ 2,343,789 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MW 3 M 74.7 710,502 $

$ 1,054,017 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MW 3 M 22.2 1,877,299 $

$ 76,930 $

$ 425,734 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MW 3 M 31.0 988,462 $

$ 103,176 $

$ 159,346 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 MW 3 M 97.0 4,121,530 $

$ 455,551 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 MW 3 M 14.8 1,577,576 $

$ 102,082 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 SO 3 M 56.1 3,306,590 $

$ 296,522 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 SO 3 M 5.9 914,211 $

$ 50,916 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Liquid LW Large1 SO 3 M 91.2 4,061,598 $

$ 482,921 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MA 3 M 31.5 2,806,965 $

$ 379,657 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MW 3 M 43.5 3,876,285 $

$ 331,801 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 SO 1 H 1.6 304,117 $ 14,270 $ 13,858 $ 848 $ 12,734 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 SO 1 H 2.8 288,393 $ 14,629 $ 18,360 $ 796 $ 11,941 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 MA 1 H 2.1 190,797 $ 12,591 $ 15,391 $ 706 $ 10,575 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 MA 1 H 3.6 174,600 $ 12,337 $ 20,619 $ 592 $ 8,881 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large2 CE 1 H 3.1 39,205 $ 8,783 $ 21,348 $ 387 $ 5,807 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large1 CE 1 H 4.3 48,891 $ 7,408 $ 29,419 $ 218 $ 3,280 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MA 1 H 1.8 19,636 $ 7,605 $ 11,414 $ 399 $ 5,973 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MA 1 H 2.5 26,353 $ 5,647 $ 16,637 $ 216 $ 3,247 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MA 1 H 5.6 238,939 $ 21,636 $ 45,133 $ 1,084 $ 16,260 $

Option 6 costs are only calculated for swine operations. For all other model farms Options 2 costs should be used. Model Farm Costs for All Options Option Animal Farm Type Manure Type Size Class Region Category Performance Needs Number of Facilities Capital Costs Fixed Costs Annual O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs 3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MA 1 H 7.8 177,955 $ 16,002 $ 55,992 $ 570 $ 8,514 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MW 1 H 25.0 280,064 $ 84,367 $ 171,694 $ 4,026 $ 60,367 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MW 1 H 34.8 367,778 $ 73,623 $ 238,436 $ 2,682 $ 40,119 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MW 1 H 19.3 745,710 $ 61,008 $ 158,074 $ 2,835 $ 42,480 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MW 1 H 26.9 647,550 $ 54,324 $ 201,155 $ 1,909 $ 28,500 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large2 CE 1 H 3.2 40,470 $ 9,066 $ 22,037 $ 399 $ 5,994 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large1 CE 1 H 4.4 50,028 $ 7,580 $ 30,103 $ 223 $ 3,356 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MA 1 H 2.8 32,342 $ 12,525 $ 18,800 $ 657 $ 9,837 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MA 1 H 3.9 41,111 $ 8,810 $ 25,954 $ 336 $ 5,066 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MA 1 H 4.7 210,705 $ 18,159 $ 38,333 $ 910 $ 13,647 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MA 1 H 6.6 151,563 $ 13,540 $ 47,422 $ 482 $ 7,204 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MW 1 H 32.1 359,602 $ 108,328 $ 220,454 $ 5,169 $ 77,512 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MW 1 H 44.7 471,050 $ 94,297 $ 305,390 $ 3,435 $ 51,385 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MW 1 H 13.3 519,420 $ 42,042 $ 109,206 $ 1,954 $ 29,274 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MW 1 H 18.5 449,460 $ 37,562 $ 139,173 $ 1,320 $ 19,706 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 MW 1 H 7.5 495,476 $ 85,950 $ 65,474 $ 5,249 $ 78,750 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 MW 1 H 1.1 192,079 $ 35,029 $ 19,554 $ 2,265 $ 33,973 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 SO 1 H 3.3 283,247 $ 43,173 $ 35,293 $ 2,666 $ 40,005 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 SO 1 H 0.3 69,800 $ 10,985 $ 7,066 $ 713 $ 10,697 $

3C/ 3D Chic Liquid LW Large1 SO 1 H 7.1 134,543 $ 41,606 $ 46,901 $ 2,321 $ 34,790 $

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MA 1 H 1.2 204,253 $ 8,552 $ 13,458 $ 493 $ 7,400 $

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MW 1 H 1.7 288,016 $ 10,329 $ 18,241 $ 580 $ 8,697 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 SO 2 H 72.8 17,151,667 $ 147,649 $ 415,470 $ 5,178 $ 77,761 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 SO 2 H 126.0 13,536,841 $ 202,121 $ 615,753 $ 5,453 $ 81,161 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 MA 2 H 31.1 3,321,515 $ 76,090 $ 186,199 $ 3,090 $ 46,234 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 MA 2 H 53.8 2,669,520 $ 98,125 $ 268,373 $ 3,084 $ 46,477 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large2 CE 2 H 7.0 96,678 $ 26,010 $ 48,478 $ 1,287 $ 19,290 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large1 CE 2 H 9.7 113,507 $ 18,239 $ 66,451 $ 593 $ 8,927 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MA 2 H 10.3 129,089 $ 31,167 $ 814,568 $ 1,419 $ 21,279 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MA 2 H 14.3 155,058 $ 23,601 $ 440,836 $ 652 $ 9,873 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MA 2 H 32.7 2,083,947 $ 98,949 $ 280,567 $ 4,505 $ 512,987 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MA 2 H 45.6 1,426,183 $ 75,260 $ 336,040 $ 2,079 $ 238,963 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MW 2 H 24.9 301,286 $ 118,333 $ 436,281 $ 6,290 $ 94,429 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MW 2 H 34.7 369,242 $ 75,164 $ 343,443 $ 2,788 $ 41,852 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MW 2 H 19.2 1,080,476 $ 91,245 $ 166,930 $ 4,850 $ 200,800 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MW 2 H 26.8 732,116 $ 58,052 $ 200,392 $ 2,154 $ 86,600 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large2 CE 2 H 7.2 99,440 $ 26,753 $ 49,863 $ 1,324 $ 19,841 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large1 CE 2 H 10.0 117,018 $ 18,803 $ 68,506 $ 612 $ 9,203 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MA 2 H 16.5 206,793 $ 49,928 $ 1,328,808 $ 2,273 $ 34,088 $

Option 6 costs are only calculated for swine operations. For all other model farms Options 2 costs should be used. Model Farm Costs for All Options Option Animal Farm Type Manure Type Size Class Region Category Performance Needs Number of Facilities Capital Costs Fixed Costs Annual O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs 3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MA 2 H 23.0 249,393 $ 37,960 $ 720,170 $ 1,048 $ 15,880 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MA 2 H 27.5 1,762,786 $ 83,214 $ 236,407 $ 3,788 $ 431,411 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MA 2 H 38.4 1,202,814 $ 63,376 $ 283,062 $ 1,750 $ 201,232 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MW 2 H 32.0 387,195 $ 152,075 $ 601,546 $ 8,083 $ 121,355 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MW 2 H 44.6 474,587 $ 96,609 $ 459,274 $ 3,584 $ 53,793 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MW 2 H 13.2 752,743 $ 63,206 $ 115,846 $ 3,360 $ 139,096 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MW 2 H 18.5 507,105 $ 40,073 $ 138,416 $ 1,487 $ 59,780 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 MW 2 H 45.7 2,756,533 $ 58,130 $ 252,550 $ 960 $ 14,258 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 MW 2 H 7.0 1,102,003 $ 9,534 $ 53,480 $ 189 $ 2,814 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 SO 2 H 27.5 2,116,180 $ 34,980 $ 158,310 $ 578 $ 8,580 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 SO 2 H 2.9 597,867 $ 3,950 $ 23,029 $ 78 $ 1,166 $

3C/ 3D Chic Liquid LW Large1 SO 2 H 43.0 3,865,356 $ 96,794 $ 500,257 $ 3,712 $ 55,610 $

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MA 2 H 23.8 3,979,813 $ 74,905 $ 582,349 $ 3,467 $ 52,057 $

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MW 2 H 32.8 5,484,784 $ 103,230 $ 504,853 $ 4,778 $ 71,742 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 SO 3 H 26.4 6,421,690 $

$ 137,581 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 SO 3 H 45.7 4,767,455 $

$ 207,909 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large2 MA 3 H 15.4 1,873,047 $

$ 83,776 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid BR Large1 MA 3 H 26.7 1,427,110 $

$ 122,446 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large2 CE 3 H 4.0 78,151 $

$ 27,992 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor FF Large1 CE 3 H 5.5 64,196 $

$ 37,631 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MA 3 H 3.0 38,369 $

$ 321,887 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MA 3 H 4.2 43,466 $

$ 148,735 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MA 3 H 9.6 710,720 $

$ 90,064 $

$ 165,231 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MA 3 H 13.3 408,506 $

$ 100,620 $

$ 68,308 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large2 MW 3 H 20.9 269,694 $

$ 989,118 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit FF Large1 MW 3 H 29.1 302,931 $

$ 513,964 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large2 MW 3 H 16.1 1,452,814 $

$ 171,949 $

$ 310,671 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid FF Large1 MW 3 H 22.5 746,823 $

$ 178,105 $

$ 115,655 $

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large2 CE 3 H 4.1 80,105 $

$ 28,692 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Evapor GF Large1 CE 3 H 5.7 66,530 $

$ 38,999 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MA 3 H 4.8 59,410 $

$ 498,406 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MA 3 H 6.7 69,338 $

$ 237,268 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MA 3 H 8.1 593,674 $

$ 75,725 $

$ 139,414 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MA 3 H 11.2 343,644 $

$ 84,813 $

$ 57,603 $

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large2 MW 3 H 26.8 345,827 $

$ 1,268,342 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Pit GF Large1 MW 3 H 37.4 389,334 $

$ 660,559 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large2 MW 3 H 11.1 984,860 $

$ 117,293 $

$ 212,867 $

3C/ 3D Swin Liquid GF Large1 MW 3 H 15.5 510,535 $

$ 122,499 $

$ 79,673 $

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 MW 3 H 48.5 2,892,637 $

$ 260,387 $

$

$

Option 6 costs are only calculated for swine operations. For all other model farms Options 2 costs should be used. Model Farm Costs for All Options Option Animal Farm Type Manure Type Size Class Region Category Performance Needs Number of Facilities Capital Costs Fixed Costs Annual O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs Recurring O& M Costs 3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 MW 3 H 7.4 1,159,595 $

$ 58,969 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large1 SO 3 H 28.1 2,141,726 $

$ 174,383 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Solid LA Large2 SO 3 H 2.9 595,538 $

$ 30,239 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Chic Liquid LW Large1 SO 3 H 45.6 2,055,100 $

$ 292,171 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MA 3 H 15.8 2,591,678 $

$ 314,327 $

$

$

3C/ 3D Turk Solid SL Large1 MW 3 H 21.7 3,582,128 $

$ 216,236 $

$

$

Option 6 costs are only calculated for swine operations. For all other model farms Options 2 costs should be used.


fossil fuels to 10 percent or less of the annual capacity factor or is
subject to a federally enforceable permit limiting fossil fuel use to
10 percent or less of the annual capacity factor;
    (6) An EGU that serves a generator along with other steam
generating unit(s), IGCC(s), or stationary combustion turbine(s) where
the effective generation capacity (determined based on a prorated
output of the base load rating of each steam generating unit, IGCC, or
stationary combustion turbine) is 25 MW or less;
    (7) An EGU that is a municipal waste combustor unit that is subject
to subpart Eb of this part;
    (8) An EGU that is a commercial or industrial solid waste
incineration unit that is subject to subpart CCCC of this part; or
    (9) A steam generating unit that fires more than 50 percent non-
fossil fuels.
    (b) [Reserved]

Sec.  60.5785a  What applicable monitoring, recordkeeping, and
reporting requirements do I need to include in my plan for designated
facilities?

    (a) Your plan must include monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting
requirements for designated facilities. To satisfy this requirement,
you have the option of either:
    (1) Specifying that sources must report emission and electricity
generation data according to part 75 of this chapter; or
    (2) Including an alternative monitoring, recordkeeping, and
reporting program that includes specifications for the following
program elements:
    (i) Monitoring plans that specify the monitoring methods, systems,
and formulas that will be used to measure CO2 emissions;
    (ii) Monitoring methods to continuously and accurately measure all
CO2 emissions, CO2 emission rates, and other data
necessary to determine compliance or assure data quality;
    (iii) Quality assurance test requirements to ensure monitoring
systems provide reliable and accurate data for assessing and verifying
compliance;
    (iv) Recordkeeping requirements;
    (v) Electronic reporting procedures and systems; and
    (vi) Data validation procedures for ensuring data are complete and
calculated consistent with program rules, including procedures for
determining substitute data in instances where required data would
otherwise be incomplete.
    (b) [Reserved]

Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements

Sec.  60.5790a  What are my recordkeeping requirements?

    (a) You must keep records of all information relied upon in support
of any demonstration of plan components, plan requirements, supporting
documentation, and the status of meeting the plan requirements defined
in the plan. After the effective date of the plan, States must keep
records of all information relied upon in support of any continued
demonstration that the final standards of performance are being
achieved.
    (b) You must keep records of all data submitted by the owner or
operator of each designated facility that is used to determine
compliance with each designated facility emissions standard or
requirements in an approved State plan, consistent with the designated
facility requirements listed in Sec.  60.5785a.
    (c) If your State has a requirement for all hourly CO2
emissions and generation information to be used to calculate compliance
with an annual emissions standard for designated facilities, any
information that is submitted by the owners or operators of designated
facilities to the EPA electronically pursuant to requirements in part
75 of this chapter meets the recordkeeping requirement of this section
and you are not required to keep records of information that would be
in duplicate of paragraph (b) of this section.
    (d) You must keep records at a minimum for 5 years from the date
the record is used to determine compliance with a standard of
performance or plan requirement. Each record must be in a form suitable
and readily available for expeditious review.

Sec.  60.5795a  What are my reporting and notification requirements?

    You must submit an annual report as required under Sec.  60.25a(e)
and (f).

Sec.  60.5800a  How do I submit information required by these Emission
Guidelines to the EPA?

    (a) You must submit to the EPA the information required by these
emission guidelines following the procedures in paragraphs (b) through
(e) of this section unless you submit through the procedure described
in paragraph (f) of this section.
    (b) All negative declarations, State plan submittals, supporting
materials that are part of a State plan submittal, any plan revisions,
and all State reports required to be submitted to the EPA by the State
plan may be reported through EPA's electronic reporting system to be
named and made available at a later date.
    (c) Only a submittal by the Governor or the Governor's designee by
an electronic submission through SPeCS shall be considered an official
submittal to the EPA under this subpart. If the

Governor wishes to designate another responsible official the authority
to submit a State plan, the EPA must be notified via letter from the
Governor prior to the July 8, 2022, deadline for plan submittal so that
the official will have the ability to submit a plan in the SPeCS. If
the Governor has previously delegated authority to make CAA submittals
on the Governor's behalf, a State may submit documentation of the
delegation in lieu of a letter from the Governor. The letter or
documentation must identify the designee to whom authority is being
designated and must include the name and contact information for the
designee and also identify the State plan preparers who will need
access to the EPA electronic reporting system. A State may also submit
the names of the State plan preparers via a separate letter prior to
the designation letter from the Governor in order to expedite the State
plan administrative process. Required contact information for the
designee and preparers includes the person's title, organization, and
email address.
    (d) The submission of the information by the authorized official
must be in a non-editable format. In addition to the non-editable
version all plan components designated as federally enforceable must
also be submitted in an editable version.
    (e) You must provide the EPA with non-editable and editable copies
of any submitted revision to existing approved federally enforceable
plan components. The editable copy of any such submitted plan revision
must indicate the changes made at the State level, if any, to the
existing approved federally enforceable plan components, using a
mechanism such as redline/strikethrough. These changes are not part of
the State plan until formal approval by EPA.
    (f) If, in lieu of the requirements described in paragraphs (b)
through (e) of this section, you choose to submit a paper copy or an
electronic version by other means you must confer with your EPA
Regional Office regarding the additional guidelines for submitting your
plan.

Definitions

Sec.  60.5805a  What definitions apply to this subpart?

    As used in this subpart, all terms not defined herein will have the
meaning given them in the Clean Air Act and in subparts TTTT, A, and Ba
of this part.
    Air Heater means a device that recovers heat from the flue gas for
use in pre-heating the incoming combustion air and potentially for
other uses such as coal drying.
    Annual capacity factor means the ratio between the actual heat
input to an EGU during a calendar year and the potential heat input to
the EGU had it been operated for 8,760 hours during a calendar year at
the base load rating.
    Base load rating means the maximum amount of heat input (fuel) that
an EGU can combust on a steady-state basis, as determined by the
physical design and characteristics of the EGU at ISO conditions.
    Boiler feed pump (or boiler feedwater pump) means a device used to
pump feedwater into a steam boiler at an EGU. The water may be either
freshly supplied or returning condensate produced from condensing steam
produced by the boiler.
    CO2 emission rate means for a designated facility, the
reported CO2 emission rate of a designated facility used by
a designated facility to demonstrate compliance with its CO2
standard of performance.
    Combined cycle unit means an electric generating unit that uses a
stationary combustion turbine from which the heat from the turbine
exhaust gases is recovered by a heat recovery steam generating unit to
generate additional electricity.
    Combined heat and power unit or CHP unit (also known as
``cogeneration'') means an electric generating unit that uses a steam-
generating unit or stationary combustion turbine to simultaneously
produce both electric (or mechanical) and useful thermal output from
the same primary energy source.
    Compliance period means a discrete time period for a designated
facility to comply with a standard of performance.
    Designated facility means a steam generating unit that meets the
relevant applicability conditions in section Sec.  60.5775a, except as
provided in Sec.  60.5780a.
    Economizer means a heat exchange device used to capture waste heat
from boiler flue gas which is then used to heat the boiler feedwater.
    Fossil fuel means natural gas, petroleum, coal, and any form of
solid fuel, liquid fuel, or gaseous fuel derived from such material to
create useful heat.
    Integrated gasification combined cycle facility or IGCC means a
combined cycle facility that is designed to burn fuels containing 50
percent (by heat input) or more solid-derived fuel not meeting the
definition of natural gas plus any integrated equipment that provides
electricity or useful thermal output to either the affected facility or
auxiliary equipment. The Administrator may waive the 50 percent solid-
derived fuel requirement during periods of the gasification system
construction, startup and commissioning, shutdown, or repair. No solid
fuel is directly burned in the unit during operation.
    Intelligent sootblower means an automated system that use process
measurements to monitor the heat transfer performance and strategically
allocate steam to specific areas to remove ash buildup at a steam
generating unit.
    ISO conditions means 288 Kelvin (15 [deg]C), 60 percent relative
humidity and 101.3 kilopascals pressure.
    Nameplate capacity means, starting from the initial installation,
the maximum electrical generating output that a generator, prime mover,
or other electric power production equipment under specific conditions
designated by the manufacturer is capable of producing (in MWe, rounded
to the nearest tenth) on a steady-state basis and during continuous
operation (when not restricted by seasonal or other deratings) as of
such installation as specified by the manufacturer of the equipment, or
starting from the completion of any subsequent physical change
resulting in an increase in the maximum electrical generating output
that the equipment is capable of producing on a steady-state basis and
during continuous operation (when not restricted by seasonal or other
deratings), such increased maximum amount (in MWe, rounded to the
nearest tenth) as of such completion as specified by the person
conducting the physical change.
    Natural gas means a fluid mixture of hydrocarbons (e.g., methane,
ethane, or propane), composed of at least 70 percent methane by volume
or that has a gross calorific value between 35 and 41 megajoules (MJ)
per dry standard cubic meter (950 and 1,100 Btu per dry standard cubic
foot), that maintains a gaseous State under ISO conditions. In
addition, natural gas contains 20.0 grains or less of total sulfur per
100 standard cubic feet. Finally, natural gas does not include the
following gaseous fuels: Landfill gas, digester gas, refinery gas, sour
gas, blast furnace gas, coal-derived gas, producer gas, coke oven gas,
or any gaseous fuel produced in a process which might result in highly
variable sulfur content or heating value.
    Net electric output means the amount of gross generation the
generator(s) produce (including, but not limited to, output from steam
turbine(s), combustion turbine(s), and gas expander(s)), as measured at
the generator terminals, less the electricity used to operate the plant
(i.e., auxiliary loads); such uses include fuel handling equipment,
pumps, fans, pollution

control equipment, other electricity needs, and transformer losses as
measured at the transmission side of the step up transformer (e.g., the
point of sale).
    Net energy output means:
    (1) The net electric or mechanical output from the affected
facility, plus 100 percent of the useful thermal output measured
relative to SATP conditions that is not used to generate additional
electric or mechanical output or to enhance the performance of the unit
(e.g., steam delivered to an industrial process for a heating
application).
    (2) For combined heat and power facilities where at least 20.0
percent of the total gross or net energy output consists of electric or
direct mechanical output and at least 20.0 percent of the total gross
or net energy output consists of useful thermal output on a 12-
operating month rolling average basis, the net electric or mechanical
output from the designated facility divided by 0.95, plus 100 percent
of the useful thermal output; (e.g., steam delivered to an industrial
process for a heating application).
    Neural network means a computer model that can be used to optimize
combustion conditions, steam temperatures, and air pollution at steam
generating unit.
    Simple cycle combustion turbine means any stationary combustion
turbine which does not recover heat from the combustion turbine engine
exhaust gases for purposes other than enhancing the performance of the
stationary combustion turbine itself.
    Standard ambient temperature and pressure (SATP) conditions means
298.15 Kelvin (25 [deg]C, 77 [deg]F) and 100.0 kilopascals (14.504 psi,
0.987 atm) pressure. The enthalpy of water at SATP conditions is 50
Btu/lb.
    State agent means an entity acting on behalf of the State, with the
legal authority of the State.
    Stationary combustion turbine means all equipment, including but
not limited to the turbine engine, the fuel, air, lubrication and
exhaust gas systems, control systems (except emissions control
equipment), heat recovery system, fuel compressor, heater, and/or pump,
post-combustion emissions control technology, and any ancillary
components and sub-components comprising any simple cycle stationary
combustion turbine, any combined cycle combustion turbine, and any
combined heat and power combustion turbine based system plus any
integrated equipment that provides electricity or useful thermal output
to the combustion turbine engine, heat recovery system or auxiliary
equipment. Stationary means that the combustion turbine is not self-
propelled or intended to be propelled while performing its function. It
may, however, be mounted on a vehicle for portability. If a stationary
combustion turbine burns any solid fuel directly it is considered a
steam generating unit.
    Steam generating unit means any furnace, boiler, or other device
used for combusting fuel and producing steam (nuclear steam generators
are not included) plus any integrated equipment that provides
electricity or useful thermal output to the affected facility or
auxiliary equipment.
    Useful thermal output means the thermal energy made available for
use in any heating application (e.g., steam delivered to an industrial
process for a heating application, including thermal cooling
applications) that is not used for electric generation, mechanical
output at the designated facility, to directly enhance the performance
of the designated facility (e.g., economizer output is not useful
thermal output, but thermal energy used to reduce fuel moisture is
considered useful thermal output), or to supply energy to a pollution
control device at the designated facility. Useful thermal output for
designated facility(s) with no condensate return (or other thermal
energy input to the designated facility(s)) or where measuring the
energy in the condensate (or other thermal energy input to the
designated facility(s)) would not meaningfully impact the emission rate
calculation is measured against the energy in the thermal output at
SATP conditions. Designated facility(s) with meaningful energy in the
condensate return (or other thermal energy input to the designated
facility) must measure the energy in the condensate and subtract that
energy relative to SATP conditions from the measured thermal output.
    Variable frequency drive means an adjustable-speed drive used on
induced draft fans and boiler feed pumps to control motor speed and
torque by varying motor input frequency and voltage.

[FR Doc. 2019-13507 Filed 7-5-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: April 26, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 80)]
[Notices]
[Page 20842]
[DOCID:fr26ap07-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-402-000]

Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership; Notice of
Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

April 20, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 18, 2007, Great Lakes Gas Transmission
Limited Partnership (Great Lakes) tendered for filing as part of its
FERC Gas Tariff the following tariff sheets, to become effective
February 22, 2007:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 0
Third Revised Sheet No. 50Q
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 65
Third Revised Sheet No. 85
Third Revised Sheet No. 86B
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 88

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-7981 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 27 (Thursday, February 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9117-9118]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02775]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 34189; File No. 812-15165]

The RBB Fund, Inc., et al.

February 5, 2021.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice of an application for an order under section 6(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') for an exemption from sections
2(a)(32), 5(a)(1), 22(d) and 22(e) of the Act and rule 22c-1 under the
Act, and under sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act for an exemption from
sections 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(2) of the Act.

Applicants:  The RBB Fund, Inc. (the ``Company''), Red Gate Advisers,
LLC (the ``Initial Adviser''), and Herald Investment Marketing, LLC
(the ``Distributor'').

Summary of Application:  Applicants request an order (``Order'') that
permits: (a) Shielded Alpha ETFs (as described in the Reference Order
(defined below)) to issue shares (``Shares'') redeemable in large
aggregations only (``creation units''); (b) secondary market
transactions in Shares to occur at negotiated market prices rather than
at net asset value; (c) certain Shielded Alpha ETFs to pay redemption
proceeds, under certain circumstances, more than seven days after the
tender of Shares for redemption; and (d) certain affiliated persons of
a Shielded Alpha ETF to deposit securities into, and receive securities
from, the Shielded Alpha ETF in connection with the purchase and
redemption of creation units. The relief in the Order would incorporate
by reference terms and conditions of the same relief of a previous
order granting the same relief sought by applicants, as that order may
be amended from time to time (``Reference Order'').\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Blue Tractor ETF Trust and Blue Tractor Group, LLC,
Investment Company Act Rel. Nos. 33682 (Nov. 14, 2019) (notice) and
33710 (Dec. 10, 2019) (order). Applicants are not seeking relief
under section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act for an exemption from sections
12(d)(1)(A) and 12(d)(1)(B) of the Act (the ``Section 12(d)(1)
Relief''), and relief under sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act for
an exemption from sections 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(2) of the Act relating
to the Section 12(d)(1) Relief, as granted in the Reference Order.
Accordingly, to the extent the terms and conditions of the Reference
Order relate to such relief, they are not incorporated by reference
into the Order.

Filing Date:  The application was filed on September 28, 2020 and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
amended on December 10, 2020 and on January 15, 2020.

Hearing or Notification of Hearing:  An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by emailing the Commission's
Secretary at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and serving applicants with a
copy of the request by email. Hearing requests should be received by
the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on February 25, 2021, and should be
accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to rule
0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the nature of the
writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing
on the matter, the reason for the request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification
by emailing the Commission's Secretary at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
ADDRESSES: The Commission<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Applicants: The
RBB Fund, Inc.; Red Gate Advisers, LLC; and Herald Investment
Marketing, LLC, c/o Craig A. Urciuoli, Red Gate Advisers, LLC,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harry Eisenstein, Senior Special
Counsel, at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Kaitlin Bottock, Branch Chief, at (202)
551-6825 (Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's website by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Applicants

    1. The Company is a corporation organized under the laws of
Maryland and will consist of one or more series operating as Shielded
Alpha ETFs. The Company is registered as an open-end management
investment company under the Act. Applicants seek relief with respect
to Funds (as defined below), including an initial Fund (the ``Initial
Fund''). The Funds will operate as Shielded Alpha ETFs as described in
the Reference Order.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ To facilitate arbitrage, among other things, each day a Fund
would publish a basket of securities and cash that, while different
from the Fund's portfolio, is designed to closely track its daily
performance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. The Initial Adviser is a limited liability company organized
under the laws of Pennsylvania and will be the investment adviser to
the Initial Fund. Subject to approval by the Fund's board of directors,
an Adviser (as defined below) will serve as investment adviser to each
Fund. The Initial Adviser is, and any other Adviser will be, registered
as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(``Advisers Act''). The Adviser may enter into sub-advisory agreements
with other investment advisers to act as sub-advisers with respect to
the Funds (each a ``Sub-Adviser''). Any Sub-Adviser will be registered
under the Advisers Act.
    3. The Distributor is a limited liability company organized under
the laws of Pennsylvania and a broker-dealer registered under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will act as the
principal underwriter of Shares of the Funds. Applicants request that
the requested relief apply to any distributor of Shares, whether
affiliated or unaffiliated with the Adviser and/or Sub-Adviser
(included in the term ``Distributor''). Any Distributor will comply
with the terms and conditions of the Order.

Applicants' Requested Exemptive Relief

    4. Applicants seek the requested Order under section 6(c) of the
Act for an exemption from sections 2(a)(32), 5(a)(1), 22(d) and 22(e)
of the Act and rule 22c-1 under the Act, and under sections 6(c) and
17(b) of the Act for an exemption from sections 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(2)
of the Act. The requested Order would permit applicants to offer Funds
that operate as Shielded Alpha ETFs. Because the relief requested is
the same as certain of the relief granted by the Commission under the
Reference Order and because the Initial Adviser has entered into a
licensing agreement with Blue Tractor Group, LLC, or an affiliate
thereof, in order to offer Funds that operate as Shielded Alpha ETFs,
the Order would incorporate by reference the terms and conditions of
the same relief of the Reference Order.
    5. Applicants request that the Order apply to the Initial Fund and
to any other existing or future registered open-end management
investment company or series thereof that: (a) Is advised by the
Initial Adviser or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with the Initial Adviser (any such entity, along with
the Initial Adviser, included in the term ``Adviser''); (b) operates as
a Shielded Alpha ETF as described in the Reference Order; and (c)
complies with the terms and conditions of the Order and the terms and
conditions of the Reference Order that are incorporated by reference

into the Order (each such company or series and the Initial Fund, a
``Fund'').\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ All entities that currently intend to rely on the Order are
named as applicants. Any other entity that relies on the Order in
the future will comply with the terms and conditions of the Order
and the terms and conditions of the Reference Order that are
incorporated by reference into the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    6. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that the Commission may exempt
any person, security or transaction, or any class of persons,
securities or transactions, from any provisions of the Act, if and to
the extent that such exemption is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.
Section 17(b) of the Act authorizes the Commission to exempt a proposed
transaction from section 17(a) of the Act if evidence establishes that
the terms of the transaction, including the consideration to be paid or
received, are reasonable and fair and do not involve overreaching on
the part of any person concerned, and the transaction is consistent
with the policies of the registered investment company and the general
purposes of the Act. Applicants submit that for the reasons stated in
the Reference Order the requested relief meets the exemptive standards
under sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-02775 Filed 2-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25666-25667]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09860]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-ORD-2016-0196; FRL-9945-79-ORD]

Updates to the Demographic and Spatial Allocation Models To
Produce Integrated Climate and Land Use Scenarios Version 2

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing a 30-
day public comment period for the draft document titled, ``Updates to
the Demographic and Spatial Allocation Models to Produce Integrated
Climate and Land Use Scenarios (ICLUS) Version 2'' (EPA/600/R-14/324).
EPA is also announcing that Versar, Inc., an EPA contractor for
external scientific peer review, will select four independent experts
from a pool of eight to conduct a letter peer review of the same draft
document. The document was prepared by the National Center for
Environmental Assessment within EPA's Office of Research and
Development. This document describes the development of version 2 of
Integrated Climate and Land Use Scenarios (ICLUS), including updates to
data sets and the demographic and spatial allocation models.
    EPA intends to forward the public comments that are submitted in
accordance with this document to the external peer reviewers for their
consideration during the letter peer review. When finalizing the draft
documents, EPA intends to consider any public comments received in
response to this document. EPA is releasing this draft document for the
purposes of public comment and peer review. This draft document is not
final as described in EPA's information quality guidelines and does not
represent and should not be construed to represent Agency policy or
views.
    The draft document is available via the Internet on EPA's Risk Web
page under the Recent Additions at http://www.epa.gov/risk.

DATES: The document will be available on April 29, 2016.

ADDRESSES: The draft report, ``Updates to the Demographic and Spatial
Allocation Models to Produce Integrated Climate and Land Use Scenarios
(ICLUS) Version 2,'' is available primarily via the Internet on the
Ecological Risk Assessment Products and Publications Web page at http://www.epa.gov/risk/ecological-risk-assessment-products-and-publications.
A limited number of paper copies are available from the Information
Management Team, NCEA; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile: 703-347-
8691. If you are requesting a paper copy, please provide your name,
mailing address, and the document title.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on the public comment
period, contact the ORD Docket at the EPA Headquarters Docket Center;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>; or email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For technical information, contact Britta Bierwagen, NCEA;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>; or email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Information About the Project/Document

    The first version of the Integrated Climate and Land Use Scenarios
(ICLUS) project modeled population, residential development, and
impervious surface cover changes by decade to the year 2100 consistent
with four global carbon emissions storylines and a baseline. The
current report discusses improvements to the underlying models of ICLUS
that result in version 2 (v2). ICLUS v2 is consistent with updated
global socioeconomic scenarios (e.g., Shared Socioeconomic Pathways
(SSPs)) and new global climate change model targets (e.g.,
Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs)). Improvements include the
use of updated population and land use/cover data sets, integration of
changing climate variables within the migration model, inclusion of
transportation network capacity and its increase over time, growth in
commercial and industrial land uses, and the use of population density-
driven demands for growth of residential housing, commercial
development, and industry.

This report demonstrates the effect of these improvements by comparing
national and regional results among the SSP and RCP combinations used
and the two climate models selected. ICLUS v2 shows differences in
population migration patterns by including climate variables that
change over time rather than ones that are static. Additionally,
changing commercial and industrial land uses can drive patterns of new
urban growth that have consequences for many environmental endpoints.
Therefore, ICLUS v2 is better suited to explore scenarios of climate
change impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation options, including the
use of ICLUS v2 outputs in models projecting emissions from developed
land uses and consequences for water and air quality endpoints, as well
as human health.

    Dated: April 11, 2016.
Mary A. Ross,
Deputy Director, National Center for Environmental Assessment.
[FR Doc. 2016-09860 Filed 4-28-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 231 (Friday, December 2, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 74072]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26296]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 170

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0133; FRL-8528-02-OCSPP]
RIN 2070-AK92

Notification of Submission to the Secretary of Agriculture;
Pesticides; Agricultural Worker Protection Standard; Reconsideration of
the Application Exclusion Zone Amendments

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Draft proposed rule; notification of submission to the
Secretary of Agriculture.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document notifies the public as required by the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) that the EPA
Administrator has forwarded to the Secretary of the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) a draft proposed rulemaking document
concerning ``Pesticides; Agricultural Worker Protection Standard;
Reconsideration of the Application Exclusion Zone Amendments (RIN 2070-
AK92).'' The draft regulatory document is not available to the public
until after it has been signed and made available by EPA.

DATES: See Unit I. under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0133, is available at
https://www.regulations.gov. The docket contains historical information
and this Federal Register document; it does not contain the draft
proposed rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aidan Black, Pesticide Re-Evaluation
Division (7508M), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. What action is EPA taking?

    FIFRA section 25(a)(2)(A) requires the EPA Administrator to provide
the Secretary of USDA with a copy of any draft proposed rule at least
60 days before signing it in proposed form for publication in the
Federal Register. The draft proposed rule is not available to the
public until after it has been signed by EPA. If the Secretary of USDA
comments in writing regarding the draft proposed rule within 30 days
after receiving it, then the EPA Administrator shall include the
comments of the Secretary of USDA and the EPA Administrator's response
to those comments with the proposed rule that publishes in the Federal
Register. If the Secretary of USDA does not comment in writing within
30 days after receiving the draft proposed rule, then the EPA
Administrator may sign the proposed rule for publication in the Federal
Register any time after the 30-day period.

II. Do any statutory and Executive Order reviews apply to this
notification?

    No. This document is merely a notification of submission to the
Secretary of USDA. As such, none of the regulatory assessment
requirements apply to this document.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 170

    Environmental protection, Agricultural worker, Employer, Farms,
Forests, Greenhouses, Nurseries, Pesticide handler, Pesticides, Worker
protection standard.

    Dated: November 28, 2022.
Michal Freedhoff,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2022-26296 Filed 12-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: August 24, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 162)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 42612-42614]
[DOCID:fr24au09-13]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 147

[Docket No. USCG-2009-0571]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; BW PIONEER at Walker Ridge 249, Outer Continental
Shelf FPSO, Gulf of Mexico

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes a safety zone around the BW PIONEER,
a Floating Production, Storage and Offloading (FPSO) system, at Walker
Ridge 249 on the Outer Continental Shelf. The purpose of the safety
zone is to protect the FPSO from vessels operating outside the normal
shipping channels and fairways. Placing a safety zone around the FPSO
will significantly reduce the threat of allisions, oil spills, and
releases of natural gas, and thereby protect the safety of life,
property, and the environment.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before October 23, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2009-0571 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Dr. Madeleine McNamara, U.S. Coast Guard, District
Eight Waterways Management Coordinator; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
madeleine.w.mcnamara @uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2009-0571), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via http://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via http://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2009-0571'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box, insert USCG-2009-0571 and click
``Search.'' Click the ``open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one by using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.

Background and Purpose

    The proposed safety zone is in the deepwater area of the Gulf of
Mexico in Walker Ridge 249 with a center point at 26[deg]41'46.25'' N
and 090[deg]30'30.16'' W. For the purpose of this regulation, the
deepwater area is considered to be waters of 304.8 meters (1,000 feet)
or greater depth, extending to the limits of the Exclusive Economic
Zone (EEZ). The United States EEZ extends from the baseline up to 200
nautical miles and is contiguous to the territorial sea of the United
States. Navigation in the vicinity of the safety zone consists of large
commercial shipping vessels, fishing vessels, cruise ships, tugs with
tows and

the occasional recreational vessel. The deepwater area also includes an
extensive system of fairways.
    Petrobras America Inc. requested that the Coast Guard establish a
safety zone around the FPSO BW PIONEER, which is a ship-shaped offshore
production facility that stores crude oil in tanks located in its hull.
It will attach to a moored turret buoy and move in a 360 degree arc
around the position 26[deg]41'46.25'' N and 090[deg]30'30.16'' W. The
turret buoy is detachable which allows the FPSO to disconnect while the
buoy and turret drop below the water's surface to a predetermined
depth. The FPSO has a capacity for storing 500,000 barrels of produced
oil and is expected to be offloaded on a weekly basis via a floating
hose that connects the FPSO to a shuttle tanker. During offloading
operations, a shuttle tanker will connect its bow to the FPSO BW
PIONEER and its stern to an attendant tug that will assist with safety
spacing and stability of the operations. The facility is manned with a
crew of 80 people.
    The request for the safety zone was made due to safety concerns for
both the personnel aboard the facility and the environment. Petrobras
America Inc. indicated that it is highly likely that any allision with
the facility would result in a catastrophic event. In evaluating this
request, the Coast Guard explored relevant safety factors and
considered several criteria, including but not limited to: (1) The
level of shipping activity around the facility; (2) safety concerns for
personnel aboard the facility; (3) concerns for the environment; (4)
the likeliness that an allision would result in a catastrophic event
based on proximity to shipping fairways, offloading operations,
production levels, and size of the crew; (5) the volume of traffic in
the vicinity of the proposed area; (6) the types of vessels navigating
in the vicinity of the proposed area; and, (7) the structural
configuration of the facility.
    Results from a thorough and comprehensive examination of the
criteria, IMO guidelines, and existing regulations warrant the
establishment of the proposed safety zone. The proposed regulation
would reduce significantly the threat of allisions, oil spills, and
releases of natural gas and increase the safety of life, property, and
the environment in the Gulf of Mexico by prohibiting entry into the
zone unless specifically authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast
Guard District.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone of 500 meters around
the stern of the FPSO when it is moored to the turret buoy. The FPSO
can swing in a 360 degree arc around the center point at
26[deg]41'46.25'' N and 090[deg]30'30.16'' W. If the FPSO detaches from
the turret buoy, the safety zone of 500 meters will be measured from
the center point. Entry into this zone is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District
or a designated representative. They may be contacted on VHF-FM Channel
13 or 16 or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
    This rule is not a significant regulatory action due to the
location of the FPSO BW PIONEER on the Outer Continental Shelf and its
distance from both land and safety fairways. Vessels traversing waters
near the proposed safety zone will be able to safely travel around the
zone without incurring additional costs.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in Walker Ridge
block 249.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact or a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
rule will enforce a safety zone around a FPSO facility that is in an
area of the Gulf of Mexico not frequented by vessel traffic and is not
in close proximity to a safety fairway. Further, vessel traffic can
pass safely around the safety zone without incurring additional costs.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Dr. Madeleine McNamara, U.S.
Coast Guard, District Eight Waterways Management Coordinator; telephone
504-671-2103<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not

result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 147

    Continental shelf, Marine safety, Navigation (water).

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 147 as follows:

PART 147--SAFETY ZONES

    1. The authority citation for part 147 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 14 U.S.C. 85; 43 U.S.C. 1333; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

    2. Add Sec.  147.847 to read as follows:

Sec.  147.847  BW PIONEER Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading
System Safety Zone.

    (a) Description. The BW PIONEER, a Floating Production, Storage and
Offloading (FPSO) system, is in the deepwater area of the Gulf of
Mexico at Walker Ridge 249. The FPSO can swing in a 360 degree arc
around the center point of the turret buoy's swing circle at
26[deg]41'46.25'' N and 090[deg]30'30.16'' W. The area within 500
meters (1,640.4 feet) around the stern of the FPSO when it is moored to
the turret buoy is a safety zone. If the FPSO detaches from the turret
buoy, the area within 500 meters around the center point at
26[deg]41'46.25'' N and 090[deg]30'30.16'' W will be a safety zone.
    (b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone
except the following:
    (1) An attending vessel;
    (2) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in
towing; or
    (3) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District.

    Dated: July 31, 2009.
Mary E. Landry,
Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E9-20246 Filed 8-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


[Federal Register: February 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 25)]
[Notices]
[Page 6213-6214]
[DOCID:fr08fe10-69]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2009-0001]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request, OMB No. 1660-0017; Public Assistance Program

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice; 30-day notice and request for comments; revision of a
currently approved information collection; OMB No. 1660-0017; Public
Assistance Program; FEMA Form 90-49, Request for Public Assistance;
FEMA Form 90-91, Project Worksheet (PW); FEMA Form 90-91A, Project
Worksheet--Damage Description and Scope of Work Continuation Sheet;
FEMA Form 90-91B, Project Worksheet--Cost Estimate Continuation Sheet;
FEMA Form 90-91C Project Worksheet--Maps and Sketches Sheet; FEMA Form
90-91D, Project Worksheet--Photo Sheet; FEMA Form 90-120, Special
Considerations Questions; FEMA Form 121, PNP Facility Questionnaire;
FEMA Form 90-123, Force Account Labor Summary Record; FEMA Form 90-124,
Materials Summary Record; FEMA Form 90-125, Rented Equipment Summary
Record; FEMA Form 90-126, Contract Work Summary Record; FEMA Form 90-
127, Force Account Equipment Summary Record; and FEMA Form 90-128,
Applicant's Benefits Calculation Worksheet.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has submitted
the information collection abstracted below to the Office of Management
and Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The submission describes the
nature of the information collection, the categories of respondents,
the estimated burden (i.e., the time, effort and resources used by
respondents to respond) and cost, and the actual data collection
instruments FEMA will use.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 10, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the proposed information
collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the Desk
Officer for the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection should be made to Director, Office
of Records Management, 1800 South Bell Street, Arlington, VA 20598-
3005, facsimile number<PHONE_NUMBER>, or e-mail address FEMA-
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Collection of Information

    Title: Public Assistance Program.
    Type of information collection: Revision of a currently approved
information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-0017.
    Form Titles and Numbers: FEMA Form 90-49, Request for Public
Assistance; FEMA Form 90-91, Project Worksheet (PW); FEMA Form 90-91A,
Project Worksheet--Damage Description and Scope of Work Continuation
Sheet; FEMA Form 90-91B, Project Worksheet--Cost Estimate Continuation
Sheet; FEMA Form 90-91C Project Worksheet--Maps and Sketches Sheet;
FEMA Form 90-91D, Project Worksheet--Photo Sheet; FEMA Form 90-120,
Special Considerations Questions; FEMA Form 121, PNP Facility
Questionnaire; FEMA Form 90-123, Force Account Labor Summary Record;
FEMA Form 90-124, Materials Summary Record; FEMA Form 90-125, Rented
Equipment Summary Record; FEMA Form 90-126, Contract Work Summary
Record; FEMA Form 90-127, Force Account Equipment Summary Record; and
FEMA Form 90-128,

Applicant's Benefits Calculation Worksheet.
    Abstract: The information collected is utilized by FEMA to make
determinations for Public Assistance payments based on the information
supplied by the respondents. The following listing provides the
instances of information sharing and how the individual collection
instruments provide necessary information for Public Assistance
considerations. FEMA Form 90-49 identifies the applicant and initiates
the request. FEMA Forms 90-91A, B, C and D identifies the scope of the
work and cost estimates. FEMA Form 90-120 records factors that could
affect the scope of the work. FEMA Form 90-121 is used to determine
private non-profit applicant eligibility. FEMA Form 90-123 identifies
employees from the applicant's own workforce who perform related work,
and FEMA form 90-124 identifies materials of the applicant used on the
project. FEMA Form 90-125 provides a list of materials rented for the
project, FEMA Form 90-126 identifies contract costs for the project,
FEMA Form 90-127 records the applicant's equipment costs and FEMA Form
90-128 provides the applicant's benefit costs for the project. The
request for appeals, both first and second, and well as the arbitration
requests allow for the applicant to request a review of determinations
made.
    Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 56.
    Frequency of Response: On Occasion.
    Estimated Average Hour Burden per Respondent: 2,992 Hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 167,554.
    Estimated Cost: There are no operation, maintenance, capital or
start-up costs associated with this collection.

    Dated: January 28, 2010.
Larry Gray,
Director, Office of Records Management, Office of Management, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2010-2619 Filed 2-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21735-21736]
[FR Doc No: 2023-07558]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Nos. FRA-2010-0028, -0029, -0039, -0042, -0043, -0045, -0048, -
0049, -0051, -0054, -0056, -0057, -0058, -0059, -0060, -0061, -0062, -
0064, -0065, and -0070]

Railroads' Joint Request To Amend Their Positive Train Control
Safety Plans and Positive Train Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides the public with notice that on March
22, 2023, twenty host railroads submitted a joint request for amendment
(RFA) to their FRA-approved Positive Train Control Safety Plans (PTCSP)
reflecting the updated PTC onboard software, I-ETMS On-Board 6.5.0 and
On-Board 6.5.1. This RFA includes modifications to the associated PTC
Concept of Operations and PTC System Description documents, change or
addition of system safety-critical functionality, modification to
target safety levels and changes to the human-machine interface which
requires amendments to PTC training for train crews. The functionality
changes include: updates to Train Restriction Types to address the
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) final
rule which restricts operating speeds of High-Hazard Flammable Train;
the addition of a new system safety critical function, PTC Suspension,
that prevents the generation and enforcement of targets within the
limits of a PTC Suspension area with the exception of navigation
failure and synchronization errors; and updates to the onboard

display to show prompting to the train crew whenever a system fault
related to braking prediction calculation exits. As this joint RFA
involves requests for FRA's approval of the proposed material
modifications to FRA-certified positive train control (PTC) systems,
FRA is publishing this notice and inviting public comment on railroads'
joint RFA to their PTCSPs.

DATES: FRA will consider comments received by May 1, 2023. FRA may
consider comments received after that date to the extent practicable
and without delaying implementation of valuable or necessary
modifications to PTC systems.

ADDRESSES:
    Comments: Comments may be submitted by going to https://www.regulations.gov and following the online instructions for
submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and the
applicable docket number. The relevant PTC docket numbers for the host
railroads that filed a joint RFA to their PTCSPs are cited above and in
the Supplementary Information section of this notice. For convenience,
all active PTC dockets are hyperlinked on FRA's website at https://railroads.dot.gov/research-development/program-areas/train-control/ptc/railroads-ptc-dockets. All comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov; this includes any personal
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gabe Neal, Staff Director, Signal,
Train Control, and Crossings Division, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In general, Title 49 United States Code
(U.S.C.) Section 20157(h) requires FRA to certify that a host
railroad's PTC system complies with Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 236, subpart I, before the technology may be
operated in revenue service. Before making certain changes to an FRA-
certified PTC system or the associated FRA-approved PTCSP, a host
railroad must submit, and obtain FRA's approval of, an RFA to its PTCSP
under 49 CFR 236.1021.
    Under 49 CFR 236.1021(e), FRA's regulations provide that FRA will
publish a notice in the Federal Register and invite public comment in
accordance with 49 CFR part 211, if an RFA includes a request for
approval of a material modification of a signal and train control
system. Accordingly, this notice informs the public that the twenty
host railroads' recent, joint RFA to their PTCSPs is available in their
respective public PTC dockets, and this notice provides an opportunity
for public comment.
    On March 22, 2023, the following twenty host railroads jointly
submitted an RFA to their respective PTCSPs for their Interoperable
Electronic Train Management Systems (I-ETMS): Alaska Railroad; The Belt
Railway Company of Chicago; BNSF Railway; Caltrain; Canadian National
Railway; Canadian Pacific Railway; Consolidated Rail Corporation; CSX
Transportation, Inc.; Kansas City Southern Railway; Kansas City
Terminal Railway; National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak); New
Mexico Rail Runner Express; Norfolk Southern Railway; North County
Transit District; Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad
Corporation (Metra); Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District;
South Florida Regional Transportation Authority; Southern California
Regional Rail Authority (Metrolink); Terminal Railroad Association of
St. Louis; and Union Pacific Railroad. Their joint RFA is available in
Docket Numbers FRA-2010-0028, -0029, -0039, -0042, -0043, -0045, -0048,
-0049, -0051, -0054, -0056, -0057, -0058, -0059, -0060, -0061, -0062, -
0064, -0065, and -0070. Interested parties are invited to comment on
this RFA by submitting written comments or data. During FRA's review of
these railroads' joint RFA, FRA will consider any comments or data
submitted within the timeline specified in this notice and to the
extent practicable, without delaying implementation of valuable or
necessary modifications to PTC systems. See 49 CFR 236.1021; see also
49 CFR 236.1011(e). Under 49 CFR 236.1021, FRA maintains the authority
to approve, approve with conditions, or deny these railroads' joint RFA
to their PTCSPs at FRA's sole discretion.

Privacy Act Notice

    In accordance with 49 CFR 211.3, FRA solicits comments from the
public to better inform its decisions. DOT posts these comments,
without edit, including any personal information the commenter
provides, to https://www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of
records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See https://www.regulations.gov/privacy-notice for the privacy notice of regulations.gov. To facilitate
comment tracking, we encourage commenters to provide their name, or the
name of their organization; however, submission of names is completely
optional. If you wish to provide comments containing proprietary or
confidential information, please contact FRA for alternate submission
instructions.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Carolyn R. Hayward-Williams,
Director, Office of Railroad Systems and Technology.
[FR Doc. 2023-07558 Filed 4-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P