[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 28, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24418-24420]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11006]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2019-0296]
RIN 1625-AA11

Regulated Navigation Area; Lake Washington, Seattle, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a permanent
regulated navigation area for certain waters of Lake Washington. The
regulated navigation area is intended to protect personnel and vessels
from potential hazards created by excessive vessel wake prior to and
following high traffic Seafair events. We invite your comments on this
proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 27, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2019-0296 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Petty Officer Amy Hamilton, Sector
Puget Sound Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    The Coast Guard was notified by the Mercer Island Police Department
of hazardous conditions associated with increased vessel and swimmer
congestion after high traffic Seafair marine events, which can make
routine navigation for persons and vessels unsafe. The Seafair event
draws an extraordinary amount of boaters and persons to the waterway to
observe several high traffic events, such as the Seafair Hydroplane
Races and Seafair Air Shows. The wakes created by transiting vessels
near the vicinity of vessels moored to the log boom during high traffic
events pose a safety concern to vessels and swimmers in the area. Coast
Guard action is needed to restrict vessel movement prior to and after
Seafair events where significant marine traffic endanger the safety of
swimmers and vessels proximate to the log boom.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of persons
and vessels on the navigable waters of Lake Washington within the
regulated navigation area from excessive vessel wake occurring prior to
and after Seafair events. The Coast Guard is proposing this rulemaking
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231).

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The District Commander is proposing to establish a regulated
navigation area prior to and after Seafair activities, which usually
occur during the last week of July and the first two weeks of August.
The regulated navigation area would cover all navigable waters within
Lake Washington south of the Interstate 90 floating Bridge and north of
a line between Bailey Peninsula and Mercer Island. The duration of the
regulated navigation area is intended to protect personnel and vessels
in these navigable waters from excessive wake associated with vessels
before and after high traffic Seafair events. Vessels transiting the
area will be required to create minimum wake at speeds of less than 7
miles per hour, unless a higher minimum speed is necessary to maintain
bare steerageway. Enforcement periods for this rule will occur daily
prior to and immediately following Seafair activities. The regulatory
text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration and time-of-day of the regulated navigation area.
Vessel traffic will be able to transit through the regulated navigation
area, and the regulation will only impact a small designated area of
Lake Washington for less than three days. Moreover, the Coast Guard
would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16
about the regulated navigation area.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.

    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
regulated navigation area may be small entities, for the reasons stated
in section IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary
determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule involves a regulated navigation area
enforced annually for a total of less than 3 days that would restrict
vessel speed to a minimum wake of less than 7 miles per hour. Normally
such actions are categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.1341 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.1341   Regulated Navigation Area; Lake Washington; Seattle,
WA.

    (a) Location. The following area is a regulated navigation area:
All waters of Lake Washington south of the Interstate 90 Floating West
Bound Bridge and north of the points between Bailey Peninsula at
47[deg]33'14.4'' N, 122[deg]14'47.3'' and Mercer Island at
47[deg]33'24.5'' N, 122[deg]13'52.5'' W.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard

coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard
vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port Puget Sound (COTP) in the enforcement
of the regulated navigation zone.
    (c) Regulations. All vessels and persons transiting the regulated
navigation area described in paragraph (a) of this section must proceed
at a speed which creates minimum wake, 7 miles per hour or less, unless
a higher minimum speed is necessary to maintain bare steerageway.
    (d) Enforcement periods. This section will be enforced annually
immediately before and after Seafair activities which usually occurs
during the last week in July and the first two weeks of August. The
event will be one week or less in duration and the specific dates and
times of the enforcement periods will be published in a notice of
enforcement in the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 21, 2019.
D.G. Throop,
 Commander, RADM, U.S. Coast Guard, Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2019-11006 Filed 5-24-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7179-7180]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02606]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0947; FRL-9906-29-OAR]

Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request; Federal
Implementation Plans To Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate
Matter and Ozone (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to
submit an information collection request (ICR), ``Information
Collection Request Renewal for the Federal Implementation Plans to
Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone'' (EPA
ICR Number 2391.03, OMB Control No. 2060-0667) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Before doing so,
EPA is soliciting public comments on specific aspects of the proposed
information collection as described below. This is a proposed extension
of the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule ICR, which is currently approved
through July 31, 2014. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor and a
person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless
it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before April 7, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2009-0491 online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by
email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket
Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen VanSickle, Clean Air Markets
Division, Office of Air and Radiation, (6204J), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. EPA
will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate.
The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for review and
approval. At that time, EPA

will issue another Federal Register notice to announce the submission
of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to submit additional comments to
OMB.
    Abstract: This is a proposed extension of an ICR that has not been
implemented because the underlying rule (known as the Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule or Transport Rule) was first stayed before the scheduled
start of compliance and was then vacated by the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the D.C. Circuit. The D.C. Circuit's decision vacating the rule is
currently under review by the U.S. Supreme Court (EPA v. EME Homer City
Generation, L.P., Nos. 12-1182 and 12-1183 (U.S. argued Dec. 10,
2013)). EPA is proceeding with renewal so that the ICR is in place
should the Supreme Court reverse the lower court decision.
    On July 6, 2011 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
finalized Federal Implementation Plans to Reduce Interstate Transport
of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone (Cross-State Air Pollution Rule or
CSAPR). CSAPR would supersede the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR),
which pursuant to a 2008 D.C. Circuit decision is being implemented
pending the promulgation of a replacement rule. CSAPR includes certain
new reporting requirements beyond the CAIR reporting requirements, and
combines these new requirements with existing requirements from the
Emission Reporting Requirements for Ozone State Implementation Plan
(SIP) Revisions Relating to Statewide Budgets for NOX
Emissions to Reduce Regional Transport of Ozone (NOX SIP
Call) and the Acid Rain Program (ARP) under Title IV of the Clean Air
Act Amendments of 1990. Each of these existing requirements has an
approved ICR in place. The current ICRs are: CAIR (EPA ICR Number
2152.05/OMB Control Number 2060-0570), NOX SIP Call (EPA ICR
Number 1857.06/OMB Control Number 2060-0445) and ARP (EPA ICR Number
1633.16/OMB Control Number 2060-0258). This ICR and the accompanying
draft supporting statement are being submitted to account for the
incremental burden associated with CSAPR as it was to supersede CAIR in
2012. As such, the draft supporting statement references the burden
analysis included in EPA ICR Numbers 2152.04, 1857.05, and 1633.15, and
estimates the change in burden resulting from CSAPR beyond the scope of
the existing ICRs for the NOX SIP Call requirements and the
Acid Rain Program. The burden included in this ICR includes start-up
and capital costs for units newly affected by an emissions trading
program and/or whose reporting status has changed (e.g., from ozone
season only to annual reporting), annualized capital costs for units
previously subject to the NOX SIP Call requirements or CAIR,
and the incremental operation and maintenance costs for all CSAPR-
affected units. The burden and costs accounted for under the CAIR ICR
(EPA ICR Number 2152.04) would no longer occur following implementation
of the CSAPR ICR. Instead, all those burdens and costs would be
accounted for under this ICR as part of CSAPR implementation.
    In addition to the July 6, 2011 final CSAPR, on December 15, 2011
EPA finalized a supplemental rulemaking that added five additional
states to the CSAPR ozone season NOX program: Iowa,
Michigan, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin. EPA has included in the
CSAPR ICR the costs/burdens associated with CSAPR ozone season-affected
units for these five additional states. Further, at the time when the
draft supporting statement for this ICR was prepared, EPA had also
proposed to add Kansas to the CSAPR ozone season program, so the costs/
burdens associated with Kansas facilities, like the facilities in the
other five states that were at that time merely proposed to be added to
the program, were included to allow for a full accounting of the CSAPR
program at maturity. See Appendix A of the draft supporting statement
for a separate breakout of the cost/burdens associated with these
facilities. The final supplemental rulemaking did not add Kansas to the
CSAPR ozone season NOX program, and the costs/burdens
associated with Kansas will therefore be removed from this ICR before
finalization. In the event that Kansas should be added to the CSAPR
ozone season NOX program in the future, EPA will amend this
ICR accordingly.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Entities potentially affected by
this action are those which are subject to the Federal Implementation
Plans to Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and
Ozone.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: mandatory (Sections 110(a) and
301(a) of the Clean Air Act).
    Estimated number of respondents: EPA estimates that there are
17,398 respondents subject to the Federal Implementation Plans to
Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone that
will conduct monitoring in accordance with Part 75.
    Frequency of response: yearly, quarterly, occasionally.
    Total estimated burden: 185,201 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $26,228,962 (per year), includes $13,150,678
annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no increase in hours in the total
estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently approved by
OMB.

    Dated: January 29, 2014.
Reid P. Harvey,
Director, Clean Air Markets Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-02606 Filed 2-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13705-13706]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04969]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC21-63-000.
    Applicants: Effingham County Power, LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of Effingham County Power, LLC.
    Filed Date: 3/3/21.
    Accession Number: 20210303-5205.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/24/21.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1264-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Indiana, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2021 Annual Reconciliation
Filing to be effective 7/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 3/3/21.
    Accession Number: 20210303-5161.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1265-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original Service Agreement
No. 5981; Queue No. AG1-386 to be effective 2/9/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/3/21.
    Accession Number: 20210303-5168.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1266-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2021-03-03 Variable
Operations and Maintenance Tariff Revisions to be effective 5/17/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/3/21.
    Accession Number: 20210303-5187.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1269-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to ISA, SA No.
3836; Queue No. Z1-050 (amend) to be effective 4/30/2014.
    Filed Date: 3/4/21.
    Accession Number: 20210304-5033.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/25/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1270-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company.
    Description: Initial rate filing: Raybun Gap Enhanced Reliability
Upgrade Construction Agreement Filing to be effective 2/23/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/4/21.
    Accession Number: 20210304-5093.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/25/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1271-000.
    Applicants: Georgia Power Company.
    Description: Initial rate filing: Raybun Gap Enhanced Reliability
Upgrade Construction Agreement Filing to be effective 2/23/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/4/21.
    Accession Number: 20210304-5094.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/25/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1272-000.
    Applicants: Mississippi Power Company.
    Description: Initial rate filing: Raybun Gap Enhanced Reliability
Upgrade Construction Agreement Filing to be effective 2/23/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/4/21.
    Accession Number: 20210304-5095.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/25/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1273-000.
    Applicants: Oleander Power Project, Limited Partnership.

    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Oleander Power Project,
Limited Partnership PPA with Seminole to be effective 1/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 3/4/21.
    Accession Number: 20210304-5109.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/25/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 4, 2021.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-04969 Filed 3-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


TABLE 1  Average Annual EPA Resource Requirement For The Beryllium NESHAP Subpart D Hours per Occurences/ Hours/ Hours per occurrence respondent/ respondent/ year ( Average)

year ( Average) year ( Average)

( A) ( B) ( C= A* B) ( D)

PERFORMANCE TEST Rocket Motor Firing 6 0.33 2 2 REPORT REVIEW Test Firing Report Review 4 0.33 1.32 1.33 Application of construction Notification of anticipated firing rocket motor 3 0.33 0.99 1 Review Report Test Results 1 0.33 0.33 0.33 TOTAL ANNUAL HOURS 4.66 Salary and Overhead: ( 1 person @ GS 10 Step 1: $ 17.55/ hr x 1.6 = $ 28.08/ hr)

Travel Expenses: Travel to test site ( 2 days travel, lodging, food for one ( 1) person )

Travel : ( 2 x 92 mile/ trip @ $ 0.345/ mile = $ 63.48/ yr or $ 21.16 annual average)

Agency Average Annual Cost = $ 130.85 + $ 21.16 = $ 152.01 Cost per year ($)

( E= D*$ 28.08/ hr)

$ 56.16 $ 37.35 $ 28.08 $ 9.27 $ 130.85