[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 45983]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17637]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER21-2641-000]

Quinebaug Solar, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Quinebaug Solar, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is August 31, 2021.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 11, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-17637 Filed 8-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: May 15, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 93)]
[Notices]
[Page 27347-27348]
[DOCID:fr15my07-89]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-55729; File No. SR-Phlx-2007-26]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change as Modified by Amendment No. 1
Thereto, Relating to Price Improved Linkage P/A Orders

May 9, 2007.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 21, 2007, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the
Phlx. On May 2, 2007, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.\3\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange clarified that the proposed
rule change was seeking to permit manual executions of P/A Orders
that had been price-improved on another exchange and submitted to
Phlx for execution against the original customer limit order that
gave rise to the Linkage P/A Order and made minor corrections to the
rule text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Phlx proposes to amend Phlx Rule 1034, Minimum Increments, and
to adopt proposed Phlx Rule 1080(c)(iv)(F), to permit the Exchange to
execute Linkage Principal Acting as Agent (``P/A'') Orders \4\ that are
sent to, and price-improved on, another exchange, and subsequently
presented for execution on the Phlx against customer limit orders on
the limit order book that give rise to the initial P/A Order, at a
price other than the minimum trading increment applicable to the
particular series traded.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ A P/A Order is an order under the Plan for the Purpose of
Creating and Operating an Intermarket Option Linkage (``Linkage
Plan''), for the principal account of a specialist (or equivalent
entity on another Participant Exchange that is authorized to
represent Public Customer orders), reflecting the terms of a related
unexecuted Public Customer order for which the specialist is acting
as agent. See Phlx Rule 1083(k)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed amendment to Phlx Rule 1080(c)(iv)(F) states that such
orders would be ineligible for automatic execution, and would instead
be handled manually by the specialist.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at Phlx, the
Commission's Public Reference Room, and http://www.phlx.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Phlx included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Phlx has prepared summaries, set forth in sections
A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to permit Exchange
specialists to execute price-improved P/A Orders against public
customer limit orders at prices other than the minimum trading
increment applicable to that particular series so that the customer
limit order underlying the P/A Order receives the improved price.
    Currently, Phlx Rule 1034, Minimum Increments, generally provides
that options quoting at $3.00 or higher have a minimum increment of
$.10, and options quoting under $3.00 have a minimum increment of $.05.
Options subject to the current ``penny pilot'' may

be quoted and traded in increments as low as $.01.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55153 (January 23,
2007), 72 FR 4553 (January 31, 2007) (SR-Phlx-2006-74).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change concerns P/A Orders sent from the Exchange
to another exchange via the Intermarket Option Linkage. When a P/A
Order sent from the Exchange to another exchange is executed on that
other exchange, the executed P/A Order is delivered back to the
specialist electronically, where the specialist is responsible to
execute the public customer limit order at the execution price of the
P/A Order on the other exchange.
    Recently, some P/A Orders have been executed on other exchanges at
improved prices after being submitted to a price-improvement auction
process on the other exchange. The result is that the executed P/A
Order is delivered back to the Exchange at a price that is expressed in
other than the Exchange's minimum trading increment. For example, if
the Phlx disseminated market in a particular series is 2.10 bid, 2.20
ask, and another exchange is disseminating a bid price of 2.15, a P/A
Order to sell an option series would be delivered by the Phlx
specialist to the other exchange disseminating a limit bid price of
$2.15. The specialist's P/A Order might be executed in a price-
improving auction at an improved price of $2.17 on the other exchange.
The P/A Order would be delivered back to the Phlx specialist for
execution at $2.17. This would be prohibited under current Exchange
rules, which require an execution at either $2.15 (disadvantaging the
public customer), or $2.20 (disadvantaging the specialist), because the
minimum trading increment applicable to the series is $.05.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ In this situation, Phlx specialists would execute the
customer order on the book at the price most favorable to the
customer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change is intended to eliminate this anomaly by
providing that a P/A Order that has been sent from the Exchange to, and
price-improved on, another exchange at a price expressed in other than
the minimum trading increment currently contained in the rule, and then
submitted to the Exchange for execution against the original customer
limit order that gave rise to the P/A Order, may be traded on the
Exchange at such price. Therefore, in the example above, the specialist
could fill the public customer order at the P/A Order execution price
of $2.17.
    The proposed amendment to Phlx Rule 1080(c)(iv)(F) provides that
such orders would be ineligible for automatic execution and would
instead be handled manually by the specialist.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that the proposal is designed
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest by establishing a rule that provides for accurate
execution of customer limit orders at improved prices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which Phlx consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-Phlx-2007-26 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2007-26. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the filing
also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Phlx. All comments received will be posted without
change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information
from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to
make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number
SR-Phlx-2007-26 and should be submitted on or before June 5, 2007.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-9260 Filed 5-14-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: January 10, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 7)]
[Notices]
[Page 1871]
[DOCID:fr10ja08-35]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER05-849-000]

California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice of
Extension of Time

December 27, 2007.
    On December 26, 2007, the Western Power Trading Forum (WPTF) filed
a request for an extension of time to file an answer to the Public
Utilities of the State of California's (CPUC) Motion to Supplement
Request for Rehearing or, in the Alternative, to Supplement the CPUC's
Response to the Motion For Clarification of the California Generators
filed December 21, 2007, in the above-docketed proceeding (December 21
Motion). WPTF states that because of the intervening holidays and
vacation schedules involving WPTF counsel and personnel, additional
time is needed to coordinate and prepare a responsive filing.
    Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that an extension of
time for filing answers to the CPUC's December 21 Motion is granted and
including January 14, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-238 Filed 1-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: June 13, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 113)]
[Notices]
[Page 32649-32650]
[DOCID:fr13jn07-69]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0414; FRL-8136-2]

2-Octyl-3 (2H)-isothiazolone (Octhilinone) Risk Assessment;
Notice of Availability and Risk Reduction Options

AGENCY:  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  This notice announces the availability of EPA's risk
assessments, and related documents for the pesticide 2-octyl-3 (2H)-
isothiazolone (also known as octhilinone), and opens a public comment
period on these documents. The public is encouraged to suggest risk
management ideas or proposals to address the risks identified. EPA is
developing a Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for octhilinone
through a modified, 4-Phase public participation process that the
Agency uses to involve the public in developing pesticide
reregistration decisions. Through this program, EPA is ensuring that
all pesticides meet current health and safety standards.

DATES:  Comments must be received on or before July 13, 2007.

ADDRESSES:  Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0414, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2007-0414. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The Federal regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available in regulations.gov. To access the electronic docket, go to
http://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced Search,'' then ``Docket

Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where indicated and select the
``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on the regulations.gov web
site to view the docket index or access available documents. Although
listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either in the
electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available

in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  K. Avivah Jakob, Antimicrobials
Division (7501P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-
mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide
users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution,
or use of pesticides. Since others also may be interested, the Agency
has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be
affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1.  Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2.  Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
     ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.

    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
     iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
     viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. Background

A. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    EPA is releasing for public comment its human health and
environmental fate and effects risk assessment(s) and related documents
for octhilinone, and soliciting public comment on risk management ideas
or proposals. Octhilinone is currently registered as an active
ingredient and is used as an industrial mildewcide, microbiocide,
fungicide and bacteriocide. EPA developed the risk assessment and risk
characterization for octhilinone through a modified version of its
public process for making pesticide reregistration eligibility and
tolerance reassessment decisions. Through these programs, EPA is
ensuring that pesticides meet current standards under the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended by the Food Quality
Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA).
    The primary use sites for octhilinone are as a materials
preservative, as an industrial mildewcide for cooling tower and air
washer water systems, and as a wood preservative. Some examples of
materials that can contain octhilinone include fabrics and textiles
(e.g., furniture, auto-upholstery, footwear, carpet, carpet- backing,
tents, awnings, canvas, linens, wall and window coverings, dust towels,
bedding, mattresses, pet bedding, poll liners, automotive trim, roof
liners, marine upholstery, pond liners, synthetic brooms, mops, air
filter media); coatings (e.g., walls, paints, plasters, stuccos);
sealants (e.g., grouts, caulks, joint cements); adhesives (e.g.,
wallpaper pastes, gelatin and starch based); rubber and plastics (e.g.,
latex, acrylic, styrene, butadiene, polyvinyl chloride, polymethane,
vinyl, foams); leather preservation (e.g., wet processes). Octhilinone
is also used for metalworking fluid preservation, hydraulic fluid
preservation, and industrial process and water systems including air
washer water and flow-thru cooling towers. As a wood preservative,
octhilinone is used as an antisapstain drench to debarked logs.
    EPA is providing an opportunity, through this notice, for
interested parties to provide comments and input on the Agency's risk
assessment for octhilinone. Such comments and input could address, for
example, the availability of additional data to further refine the risk
assessments, such as wood leaching data, environmental runoff
monitoring data, soil Koc values and outstanding eco-toxicity data,
which are all needed by the Agency to conduct an antisapstain wood
treatment risk assessment; and confirmatory worker exposure data, or
could address the Agency's risk assessment methodologies and
assumptions as applied to this specific pesticide.
    Through this notice, EPA also is providing an opportunity for
interested parties to provide risk management proposals or otherwise
comment on risk management for octhilinone. Risks of concern associated
with the use of octhilinone are: Occupational handler exposure and
risks of concern resulting from plastics and vinyl preservation (via
liquid pump and liquid pour), paint preservation (via liquid pump and
liquid pour), wood preservation (via mixing, loading, high pressure/
high volume spraying), professional painter application (via airless
sprayer) and use of treated paint; Residential application and post-
application risks of concern resulting from treated paint, treated
carpet, treated vinyl, treated clothing and treated mattresses; and,
Residential aggregate exposure and risks of concern resulting from
treated fabrics, clothing and polymers. In targeting these risks of
concern, the Agency solicits information on effective and practical
risk reduction measures.
    EPA seeks to achieve environmental justice, the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people, regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income, in the development, implementation, and
enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. To help
address potential environmental justice issues, the Agency seeks
information on any groups or segments of the population who, as a
result of their location, cultural practices, or other factors, may
have atypical, unusually high exposure to octhilinone, compared to the
general population.
    EPA is applying the principles of public participation to all
pesticides undergoing reregistration and tolerance reassessment. The
Agency's Pesticide Tolerance Reassessment and Reregistration; Public
Participation Process, published in the Federal Register on May 14,
2004 (69 FR 26819) (FRL-7357-9), explains that in conducting these
programs, the Agency is tailoring its public participation process to
be commensurate with the level of risk, extent of use, complexity of
the issues, and degree of public concern associated with each
pesticide. For octhilinone, a modified, 4-Phase process with one
comment period and ample opportunity for public consultation seems
appropriate in view of its refined risk assessment. However, if as a
result of comments received during this comment period EPA finds that
additional issues warranting further discussion are raised, the Agency
may lengthen the process and include a second comment period, as
needed.
    All comments should be submitted using the methods in ADDRESSES,
and must be received by EPA on or before the closing date. Comments
will become part of the Agency Docket for octhilinone. Comments
received after the close of the comment period will be marked ``late.''
EPA is not required to consider these late comments.

B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?

    Section 4(g)(2) of FIFRA as amended directs that, after submission
of all data concerning a pesticide active ingredient, ``the
Administrator shall determine whether pesticides containing such active
ingredient are eligible for reregistration,'' before calling in
product-specific data on individual end-use products and either
reregistering products or taking other ``appropriate regulatory
action.''
    Section 408(q) of the FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a(q), requires EPA to
review tolerances and exemptions for pesticide residues in effect as of
August 2, 1996, to determine whether the tolerance or exemption meets
the requirements of section 408(b)(2) or (c)(2) of FFDCA. This review
is to be completed by August 3, 2006.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests, Antimicrobial.

    Dated: June 7, 2007.
 Frank Sanders,
Director, Antimicrobials Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E7-11416 Filed 6-12-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12087-12088]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03842]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP17-58-000]

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC; Notice of
Application

    Take notice that on February 6, 2017, Transcontinental Gas Pipe
Line Company, LLC. (Transco) 2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Houston, Texas
77056-6106, filed an application pursuant to section 7(c) of the
Natural Gas Act (NGA) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's
(Commission) regulations seeking authorization to construct and operate
the St. James Supply Project (Project) in St. James Parish, Louisiana,
all as more fully described in the application which is on file with
the Commission and open to public inspection. The filing may also be
viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link.
Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket
number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY,
(202) 502-8659.
    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to
Charlotte Hutson, Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company, LLC, Post
Office Box 1396, Houston, TX 77251-1396, or call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Specifically, Transco states that the Project will enable it to
provide 161,500 dekatherms per day natural gas of incremental firm
transportation capacity from Transco's existing Station 65 zone 3 pool
in St. Helena Parish, Louisiana southward along the Southeast Louisiana
Lateral and through the St. James Supply Lateral to the Yuhuang
Chemical Plant. The facilities to be installed by Transco in the
Project include: (1) The 0.72 mile, 20-inch-diameter St. James Supply
Lateral and the associated Old River Road metering and regulation (M&R)
station at the interconnection with the Yuhuang Chemical Plant in St.
James Parish, Louisiana; (2) piping and valve installation required to
tie in the Old River Road M&R station with the existing Southeast
Louisiana Lateral ``B'' and Southeast Louisiana Lateral ``C'' at
approximately milepost (MP) 72.37; (3) piping and valve modifications
at existing Compressor Station (CS) 63 in St. James Parish, Louisiana
to allow gas to flow south along the Southeast Louisiana Lateral; (4)
piping and valve modifications at existing CS 65 in St. Helena Parish,
Louisiana to allow for bi-directional flow of gas; and (5) the proposed
Cajun Road M&R station, located on Transco's mainline at the
interconnection with Texas Eastern Transmission Company at
approximately MP 581.33 in Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 7 copies of filings made in the proceeding with the Commission
and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other party. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentors will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on March 14, 2017.

    Dated: February 21, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-03842 Filed 2-27-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P