[Federal Register: July 22, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 139)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 36129-36131]
[DOCID:fr22jy09-14]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0614; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-045-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 and Model ERJ 190 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    It has been found the occurrence of outboard slat skew sensor
failure in open or closed position. The combination of an outboard
slat skew sensor failed closed, an outboard slat actuator structural
failure (rupture) and its adjacent actuator torque limiter failing
high (allows higher loads to the panel structure) occurring in the
same slat surface, under normal flight loads, may lead [the] slat
surface to detach from the wing with the possibility of hitting and
damaging the horizontal stabilizer and elevator, which may affect
the airplane controllability.
* * * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 21, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.

(EMBRAER), Technical Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro
Faria Lima, 2170--Putim--12227-901 S[atilde]o Jose dos Campos--SP--
BRASIL; telephone: +55 12 3927-5852 or +55 12 3309-0732; fax: +55 12
3927-7546; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://
www.flyembraer.com.
    You may review copies of the referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2848; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0614;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-045-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC),
which is the aviation authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian
Airworthiness Directives 2009-02-02 and 2009-02-03, both dated February
16, 2009 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    It has been found the occurrence of outboard slat skew sensor
failure in open or closed position. The combination of an outboard
slat skew sensor failed closed, an outboard slat actuator structural
failure (rupture) and its adjacent actuator torque limiter failing
high (allows higher loads to the panel structure) occurring in the
same slat surface, under normal flight loads, may lead [the] slat
surface to detach from the wing with the possibility of hitting and
damaging the horizontal stabilizer and elevator, which may affect
the airplane controllability.

* * * * *
Corrective actions include repetitive operational tests of the outboard
slat skew sensor, and replacement with a serviceable outboard slat skew
sensor if necessary. You may obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI referenced
above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and, in general, agree with their
substance. But we might have found it necessary to use different words
from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. operators and
is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information provided in the MCAI.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 223 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 2 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $35,680, or $160 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA-
2009-0614; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-045-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by August 21, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to the airplanes certificated in any
category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of the AD.
    (1) EMBRAER Model ERJ 170-100 LR, -100 STD, -100 SE, -100 SU, -
200 LR, -200 STD, and -200 SU airplanes, equipped with outboard slat
skew sensor part number (P/N) 1702286A or 1702288A.
    (2) EMBRAER Model ERJ 190-100 ECJ, -100 LR, -100 IGW, -100 STD,
-200 STD, -200 LR, and -200 IGW airplanes, equipped with outboard
slat skew sensor P/N 1702286A or 1702288A.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    It has been found the occurrence of outboard slat skew sensor
failure in open or closed position. The combination of an outboard
slat skew sensor failed closed, an outboard slat actuator structural
failure (rupture) and its adjacent actuator torque limiter failing
high (allows higher loads to the panel structure) occurring in the
same slat surface, under normal flight loads, may lead [the] slat
surface to detach from the wing with the possibility of hitting and
damaging the horizontal stabilizer and elevator, which may affect
the airplane controllability.
* * * * *
Corrective actions include repetitive operational tests of the
outboard slat skew sensor, and replacement with a serviceable
outboard slat skew sensor if necessary.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) At the applicable compliance time in paragraph (f)(1)(i) or
(f)(1)(ii) of this AD: Perform an operational test (OPT) of any
outboard slat skew sensor having P/N 1702286A or P/N 1702288A. If
any outboard slat skew sensor fails the test, replace the sensor
with a serviceable sensor before further flight. Do the actions
using a method approved by either the Manager, International Branch,
ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the Ag[ecirc]ncia
Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC) (or its delegated
agent).
    (i) For Model ERJ 170 airplanes: Within 1,320 flight hours after
the effective date of this AD.
    (ii) For Model ERJ 190 airplanes: Within 1,320 flight hours or
12 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
first.

    Note 1:  Guidance about performing the OPT required by paragraph
(f)(1) of this AD can be found in Task 27-83-01-710-801-A,
``Outboard Slat Skew Sensor--Operational Test,'' dated October 28,
2008, of the Embraer 170/175 or 190 Aircraft Maintenance Manual
(AMM).

    Note 2: For the purpose of this AD, an OPT is ``A task to
determine if an item is fulfilling its intended purpose. Since it is
a failure-finding task, it does not require quantitative
tolerances.''

    Note 3:  For the purpose of this AD, a serviceable sensor is one
that has passed the OPT required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.

    (2) Repeat the OPT required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,320 flight hours.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 4: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness Directives 2009-02-02
and 2009-02-03, both dated February 16, 2009, for related
information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 2, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-17347 Filed 7-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 162 (Monday, August 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52338-52339]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21342]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[USCG-2011-0750]

Information Collection Request to Office of Management and Budget

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Sixty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting approval of
revisions to the following collection of information: 1625-0006,
Shipping Articles. Our ICR describes the information we seek to collect
from the public. Before submitting this ICR to OIRA, the Coast Guard is
inviting comments as described below.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before October 21,
2011.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG-2011-0750] to the Docket Management Facility (DMF) at the
U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). To avoid duplicate
submissions, please use only one of the following means:
    (1) Online: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Mail: DMF (M-30), DOT, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (3) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. To ensure your comments are received in a
timely manner, mark the fax, to attention Desk Officer for the Coast
Guard.
    The DMF maintains the public docket for this Notice. Comments and
material received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in
this Notice as being available in the docket, will become part of the
docket and will be available for inspection or copying at room W12-140
on the West Building Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also find the docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available from:
Commandant (CG-611), Attn: Paperwork Reduction Act Manager, U.S. Coast
Guard, 2100 2nd Street, SW., STOP 7101, Washington, DC 20593-7101.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Ms. Kenlinishia Tyler, Office
of Information Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for questions on these documents. Contact Ms. Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations,<PHONE_NUMBER>, for questions on the docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This Notice relies on the authority of the paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an application to
OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a Coast Guard
collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains information
describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's likely burden on
the affected public, an explanation of the necessity of the Collection,
and other important information describing the Collection. There is one
ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be
granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the
Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information
subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. In response to
your comments, we may revise this ICR or decide not to seek approval of
revisions of the Collection. We will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. Comments must contain the OMB Control Number of
the ICR and the docket number of this request, [USCG-2011-0750], and
must be received by October 21, 2011. We will post all comments
received, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov. They will
include any personal information you provide. We have an agreement with
DOT to use their DMF. Please see the ``Privacy Act'' paragraph below.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number [USCG-
2011-0750], indicate the specific section of the document to which each
comment applies, providing a reason for each comment. If you submit a
comment online via http://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
DMF. We recommend you include your name, mailing address, an e-mail
address, or other contact information in the body of your document so
that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    You may submit your comments and material by electronic means,
mail, fax, or hand delivery to the DMF at the address under ADDRESSES;
but please submit them by only one means. To submit your comment
online, go to http://www.regulations.gov, and type ``USCG-2011-0750''
in the ``Keyword'' box. If you submit your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11
inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and will address them accordingly.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this Notice as
being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, click
on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted in
blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-0750'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the DMF in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received in
dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act statement
regarding Coast Guard public dockets in

the January 17, 2008, issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Information Collection Request

    Title: Shipping Articles.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0006.
    Summary: Title 46 United States Code Sec. Sec.  10302 and 10502 and
Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 14.201 require applicable
owners, charterers, managing operators, masters, or individuals in
charge to make a shipping agreement in writing with each seaman before
the seaman commences employment. Additionally, 46 CFR 14.313 requires
shipping companies to submit Shipping Articles to the Coast Guard:
Three years after the article was generated; upon going out of business
or merger with another company; or upon request by the Coast Guard.
Upon receipt and acceptance, Shipping Articles are transferred and
archived at the Federal Records Center in Suitland, Maryland.
    Need: This collection provides verification, identification,
location and employment information of U.S. merchant mariners: (1) To
Federal, state and local law enforcement agencies for use in criminal
or civil law enforcement purposes, (2) to shipping companies, (3) to
labor unions, (4) to seaman's authorized representatives, (5) to
seaman's next of kin, and (6) whenever the disclosure of such
information would be in the best interest of the seaman or his/her
family.
    Forms: CG-705A.
    Respondents: Shipping companies.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Burden Estimate: The estimated burden is 18,000 hours a year.

    Dated: August 16, 2011.
R.E. Day,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Command,
Control, Communications, Computers and Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2011-21342 Filed 8-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: June 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 118)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 34936-34939]
[DOCID:fr21jn10-9]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2010-0250]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Chicago Tall Ships Fireworks, Lake Michigan,
Chicago, IL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
waters of Lake Michigan within Chicago Harbor, Chicago, Illinois. This
zone is intended to restrict vessels from a portion of Chicago Harbor
due to a fireworks display. This temporary safety zone is necessary to
protect the surrounding public and vessels from the hazards associated
with a fireworks display.

DATES: This rule is effective from 8:45 p.m. on August 24, 2010 until
9:15 p.m. August 28, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble

as being available in the docket, are part of docket USCG-2010-0250 and
are available online by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG-2010-0250 in the ``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.''
This material is also available for inspection or copying at the Docket
Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail CWO2 Jon Grob, U.S. Coast Guard, Sector
Lake Michigan, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    On May 3, 2010, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Safety Zone; Chicago Tall Ships Fireworks, Chicago, IL in the
Federal Register (75 FR 23209). We received 0 comments on the proposed
rule. No public meeting was requested and none was held.

Basis and Purpose

    This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect vessels from the
hazards associated with the Chicago Tall Ships Fireworks display. The
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan has determined that the
Chicago Tall Ships Fireworks display presents a significant risk to
public safety and property. The likely combination of congested
waterways and a fireworks display presents a significant risk of
serious injuries or fatalities.

Discussion of Comments and Changes

    No public comments were received concerning this event. No
substantive changes have been made to the rule as proposed.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. We conclude that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action because we anticipate that it will have
minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere with other agencies,
will not adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan recipients,
and will not raise any novel legal or policy issues. The safety zone
will be relatively small and will exist for only a minimal time. Under
certain conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit through the
safety zone when permitted by proper authority.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of Chicago Harbor between 8:45 p.m.
until 9:15 p.m. from August 24, 2010 through August 28, 2010.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
rule will only be enforced for short period of time. Vessels may safely
pass outside the safety zone during the event. In the event that this
temporary safety zone affects shipping, commercial vessels may request
permission from the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan to
transit through the safety zone. The Coast Guard will give notice to
the public via a Broadcast to Mariners that the regulation is in
effect.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism. No comments were received concerning this rule. No
substantive changes have been made to the rule as proposed.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble. No comments were received concerning this rule. No
substantive changes have been made to the rule as proposed.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights. No comments were received concerning this rule. No substantive
changes have been made to the rule as proposed.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. No comments were received
concerning this rule. No substantive changes have been made to the rule
as proposed.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children. No comments were received
concerning this rule. No substantive changes have been made to the rule
as proposed.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. No comments were
received concerning this rule. No substantive changes have been made to
the rule as proposed.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211. No comments were received concerning this
rule. No substantive changes have been made to the rule as proposed.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. No comments were
received concerning this rule. No substantive changes have been made to
the rule as proposed.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone
therefore paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction applies.
    An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0250 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T09-0250  Safety Zone; Chicago Tall Ships Fireworks, Chicago
Harbor, Chicago, IL

    (a) Location. The safety zone will encompass all waters of Lake
Michigan in the vicinity of Chicago Harbor located off the north east
end of Navy Pier, encompassing an area 600 yards by 750 yards bound by
a line drawn from bound by a line drawn from 41[deg]53'24'' N.,
087[deg]35'55'' W.; then north to 41[deg]53'41'' N., 087[deg]35'55''
W.; then east to 41[deg]53'41'' N., 087[deg]35'26'' W.; then south to
41[deg]53'24'' N., 087[deg]35'26'' W.; then west returning to the point
of origin (NAD 83).
    (b) Effective period. This regulation is effective from 8:45 p.m.
on August 24, 2010 until 9:15 p.m. on August 28, 2010. It will be
enforced between 8:45 p.m. and 9:15 p.m. on August 24, 2010, between
the hours of 8:45 p.m. and 9:15 p.m. on August 25, 2010, between the
hours of 8:45 p.m. and 9:15 p.m. on August 26, 2010, between the hours
of 8:45 p.m. and 9:15 p.m. on August 27, 2010, and again between the
hours of 8:45 p.m. and 9:15 p.m. on August 28, 2010. The Captain of the
Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her on-scene representative may
terminate this operation at anytime.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
section 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her on-scene
representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his
or her on-scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his or her behalf. The
on-scene representative of the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, will be aboard either a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or
his or her on-scene representative to obtain permission to do so. The
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her on-scene
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply
with all directions given to them by the Captain of the Port, Sector
Lake Michigan, or his or her on-scene representative.

    Dated: June 3, 2010.
L. Barndt,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2010-14848 Filed 6-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68352-68355]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26564]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0212; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-116-AD;
Amendment 39-17509; AD 2013-14-04]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A330-223F, -223, -321, -322, and -323 airplanes. This AD
was prompted by fatigue load analysis that determined that the
inspection interval for certain pylon bolts must be reduced. This AD
requires a torque check of forward engine mount bolts, and replacement
if necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct loose or
broken bolts, which could lead to engine detachment in-flight, and
damage to the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective December 19, 2013.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of December 19,
2013.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
(425) 227-1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to the specified products. The
NPRM was published in the Federal Register on March 28, 2013 (78 FR
18925). The NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2012-0094, dated May 31, 2012 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:

    The forward mount engine pylon bolts, Part Number (P/N) 51U615,
fitted on Airbus A330 aeroplanes with Pratt & Whitney (PW)

PW4000 engines, are made from MP159 material.
    The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), as Engine
Certification Authority, issued AD 2006-16-05 [Amendment 39-14705
(71 FR 44185, August 4, 2006)] to require (paragraph (g) of that AD)
repetitive torque checks of MP159 material forward mount pylon bolts
fitted on certain PW4000 series engines.
    However, the engine mount system is considered to be part of
aeroplane certification rather than the engine certification.
Following further fatigue load analysis by Airbus of the A330 engine
mount system, completed in February 2011 for both the freighter and
passenger models of A330 aeroplanes, it was determined that MP159
material forward mount pylon bolts inspection interval must be
reduced.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could ultimately
lead to engine detachment from the aeroplane, possibly resulting in
damage to the aeroplane and/or injury to person on the ground.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires
accomplishment of repetitive torque checks of the forward mount
pylon bolts installed on A330 aeroplanes powered by PW4000 engines
and, depending on findings, the replacement of all four bolts and
associated nuts.

Findings (discrepancies) include loose or broken bolts. You may examine
the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0212-0002.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (78 FR 18925, March 28,
2013) or on the determination of the cost to the public.

Additional Changes Made to This AD

    We have combined tables 1, 2, and 3 to paragraph (g) of the NPRM
(78 FR 18925, March 28, 2013) into one table, designated as table 1 to
paragraph (g) in this final rule, and updated table references in this
AD accordingly. These changes do not affect the requirements or intent
of paragraph (g) of this AD.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described
previously--except for minor editorial changes. We have determined that
these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (78 FR 18925, March 28, 2013) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 18925, March 28, 2013).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 41 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 2 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $6,970, or $170 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 1 work-hour and require parts costing $6,747, for a cost of
$6,832 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2013-0212; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800)
647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2013-14-04 Airbus: Amendment 39-17509. Docket No. FAA-2013-0212;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-116-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective December 19,
2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD affects AD 2006-16-05, Amendment 39-14705 (71 FR 44185,
August 4, 2006).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus Model A330-223F, -223, -321, -322, and
-323 airplanes, certificated in any category, all manufacturer
serial numbers.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 71, Powerplant.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by fatigue load analysis that determined
that certain pylon bolts inspection interval must be reduced. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct loose or broken bolts, which
could lead to engine detachment in-flight, and damage to the
airplane.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Torque Check and Replacement

    (1) Within the compliance times specified in table 1 to
paragraph (g) of this AD, as applicable to airplane model and
utilization, do a torque check to determine if there are any loose
or broken forward engine mount bolts (4 positions/engine) on both
engines, and repeat that torque check at intervals not to exceed the
values defined in table 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A330-71-3028, Revision 01, dated February 20, 2012. For the
purposes of table 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD, the average flight
time (AFT) is defined as a computation of the number of flight hours
divided by the number of flight cycles accumulated since last torque
check or since the airplane's first flight, as applicable.

                                       Table 1 to Paragraph (g) of This AD
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Flight cycles
                                        accumulated on the
                                      effective date of this
                                       AD since last torque
                                        check performed as
          Airplane models              specified in Pratt &         Compliance time        Torque check interval
                                      Whitney Alert Service                                   (not to exceed)
                                      Bulletin PW4G-100-A71-
                                      32, or since airplane
                                         first flight, as
                                            applicable
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Model A330-223,-321, -322, and - 0-1,850................  Within 2,350 flight cycles   2,350 flight cycles
 323 airplanes with AFT more than                              since the last torque        or 24,320 flight
 132 minutes.                                                  check as specified in        hours, whichever
                                                               Pratt & Whitney Alert        occurs first.
                                                               Service Bulletin PW4G-100-
                                                               A71-32, or since airplane
                                                               first flight, as
                                                               applicable.
For Model A330-223, -321, -322, and  1,851-2,700............  Within 500 flight cycles     2,350 flight cycles
 -323 airplanes with AFT more than                             after the effective date     or 24,320 flight
 132 minutes.                                                  of this AD without           hours, whichever
                                                               exceeding 2,700 flight       occurs first.
                                                               cycles since last torque
                                                               check as specified in
                                                               Pratt & Whitney Alert
                                                               Service Bulletin PW4G-100-
                                                               A71-32, or since airplane
                                                               first flight, as
                                                               applicable; or within 3
                                                               months after the effective
                                                               date of this AD; whichever
                                                               occurs later.
For Model A330-321,-322, and -323    0-1,450................  Within 1,950 flight cycles   1,950 flight cycles
 airplanes with AFT equal or less                              since the last torque        or 20,210 flight
 than 132 minutes; and for Model                               check performed as           hours, whichever
 A330-321, -322, and -323 airplanes                            specified in Pratt &         occurs first.
 on which the AFT is not calculated                            Whitney Alert Service
 on a regular basis.                                           Bulletin PW4G-100-A71-32,
                                                               or since airplane first
                                                               flight, as applicable.
For Model A330-321, -322, and -323   1,451-2,700............  Within 500 flight cycles     1,950 flight cycles
 airplanes with AFT equal or less                              after the effective date     or 20,210 flight
 than 132 minutes; and for Model                               of this AD without           hours, whichever
 A330-321,-322, and -323 airplanes                             exceeding 2,700 flight       occurs first.
 on which the AFT is not calculated                            cycles since last torque
 on a regular basis.                                           check performed as
                                                               specified in Pratt &
                                                               Whitney Alert Service
                                                               Bulletin PW4G-100-A71-32,
                                                               or since airplane first
                                                               flight, as applicable; or
                                                               within 3 months after the
                                                               effective date of this AD;
                                                               whichever occurs later.
For Model A330-223F airplanes......  Not applicable.........  Within 2,140 flight cycles   2,140 flight cycles
                                                               or 6,600 flight hours,       or 6,600 flight
                                                               whichever occurs first       hours, whichever
                                                               since the last torque        occurs first.
                                                               check performed as
                                                               specified in Pratt &
                                                               Whitney Alert Service
                                                               Bulletin PW4G-100-A71-32,
                                                               or since airplane first
                                                               flight, as applicable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (2) If any loose or broken bolt is detected during the check
required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, before further flight,
replace all four forward engine mount bolts and associated nuts, on
the engine where the loose or broken bolt was detected, with new
bolts and nuts, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-71-3028, Revision 01,
dated February 20, 2012.
    (3) Replacement of bolts and nuts as required by paragraph
(g)(2) of this AD is not terminating action for the repetitive
torque checks required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD.

(h) Compliance With AD 2006-16-05, Amendment 39-14705 (71 FR 44185,
August 4, 2006)

    Doing the actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD
constitutes compliance with the requirements specified in paragraph
(g) of AD 2006-16-05, Amendment 39-14705 (71 FR 44185, August 4,
2006).

(i) Parts Installation Prohibition

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install any
INCO718 material, forward mount pylon bolt having Pratt & Whitney
part number 54T670 on any airplane.

(j) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, if those actions were
performed before the effective date of this AD using Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-71-3028, dated December 16, 2011,
which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.

(k) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(l) Related Information

    (1) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2012-0094, dated May 31, 2012, for related information.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0212-0002.
    (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference may be viewed at the addresses specified
in paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD.

(m) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-71-3028, Revision 01,
dated February 20, 2012.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.airbus.com.
    (4) You may view copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 21, 2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-26564 Filed 11-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P