[Federal Register: September 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 174)]
[Notices]
[Page 54935-54937]
[DOCID:fr09se10-127]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-62820; File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2010-86]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NYSE Amex LLC Extending the
Operation of Its New Market Model Pilot Until the Earlier of Securities
and Exchange Commission Approval to Make Such Pilot Permanent or
January 31, 2011

September 1, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on August 26, 2010, NYSE Amex LLC (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Amex'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to extend the operation of its New Market
Model Pilot, currently scheduled to expire on September 30, 2010, until
the earlier of Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') approval to make such pilot permanent or January 31,
2011. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the
Exchange, the Commission's Public Reference Room, on the Commission's
website at http://www.sec.gov, and http://www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to extend the operation of its New Market
Model Pilot (``NMM Pilot'') that was adopted pursuant to its merger
with the New York Stock Exchange LLC.\4\ The NMM Pilot was approved to
operate until October 1, 2009. The Exchange filed to extend the
operation of the Pilot to November 30, 2009, March 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2010, respectively.\5\ The Exchange now seeks to extend
the operation of the NMM Pilot, currently scheduled to expire on
September 30, 2010, until the earlier of Commission approval to make
such pilot permanent or January 31, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ NYSE Euronext acquired The Amex Membership Corporation
(``AMC'') pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated January
17, 2008 (the ``Merger''). In connection with the Merger, the
Exchange's predecessor, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex''),
a subsidiary of AMC, became a subsidiary of NYSE Euronext called
NYSE Alternext US LLC. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58673
(September 29, 2008), 73 FR 57707 (October 3, 2008) (SR-NYSE-2008-60
and SR-Amex-2008-62) (approving the Merger). Subsequently NYSE
Alternext US LLC was renamed NYSE Amex LLC and continues to operate
as a national securities exchange registered under Section 6 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''). See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59575 (March 13, 2009), 74 FR
11803 (March 19, 2009) (SR-NYSEALTR-2009-24).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60758 (October 1,
2009), 74 FR 51639 (October 7, 2009) (SR-NYSEAmex-2009-65). See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61030 (November 19, 2009), 74 FR
62365 (November 27, 2009) (SR-NYSEAmex-2009-83). See also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 61725 (March 17, 2010), 75 FR 14223 (March
24, 2010) (SR-NYSEAmex-2010-28).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that parallel changes are proposed to be made to
the rules of New York Stock Exchange LLC.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See SR-NYSE-2010-61.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The information contained herein is a summary of the NMM
Pilot. For a fuller description of the pilot see Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 58845 (October 24, 2008), 73 FR 64379 (October 29,
2008) (SR-NYSE-2008-46).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In December 2008, NYSE Amex implemented significant changes to its
market rules, execution technology and the rights and obligations of
its market participants all of which were designed to improve execution
quality on the Exchange. These changes are all elements of the
Exchange's enhanced market model that it implemented through the NMM
Pilot.
    As part of the NMM Pilot, NYSE Amex eliminated the function of
specialists on the Exchange creating a new category of market
participant, the Designated Market Maker or DMM.\8\ The DMMs, like
specialists, have affirmative obligations to make an orderly market,
including continuous quoting requirements and obligations to re-enter
the market when reaching across to execute against trading interest.
Unlike specialists, DMMs have a minimum quoting requirement \9\ in
their assigned securities and no longer have a negative obligation.
DMMs are also no longer agents for public customer orders.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See NYSE Amex Equities Rule 103.
    \9\ See NYSE Amex Equities Rule 104.
    \10\ See NYSE Amex Equities Rule 60; See also NYSE Amex Equities
Rules 104 and 1000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange implemented a system change that allowed
DMMs to create a schedule of additional non-displayed liquidity at
various price points where the DMM is willing to interact with interest
and provide price improvement to orders in the Exchange's system. This
schedule is known as the DMM Capital Commitment Schedule (``CCS'').\11\
CCS

provides the Display Book[supreg] \12\ with the amount of shares that
the DMM is willing to trade at price points outside, at and inside the
Exchange Best Bid or Best Offer (``BBO''). CCS interest is separate and
distinct from other DMM interest in that it serves as the interest of
last resort.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See NYSE Amex Equities Rule 1000.
    \12\ The Display Book system is an order management and
execution facility. The Display Book system receives and displays
orders to the DMMs, contains the order information, and provides a
mechanism to execute and report transactions and publish the results
to the Consolidated Tape. The Display Book system is connected to a
number of other Exchange systems for the purposes of comparison,
surveillance, and reporting information to customers and other
market data and national market systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The NMM Pilot further modified the logic for allocating executed
shares among market participants having trading interest at a price
point upon execution of incoming orders. The modified logic rewards
displayed orders that establish the Exchange's BBO. During the
operation of the NMM Pilot orders, or portions thereof, that establish
priority \13\ retain that priority until the portion of the order that
established priority is exhausted. Where no one order has established
priority, shares are distributed among all market participants on
parity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See NYSE Amex Equities Rule 72(a)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The NMM Pilot was originally scheduled to end operation on October
1, 2009, or such earlier time as the Commission may determine to make
the rules permanent. The Exchange filed to extend the operation of the
Pilot on three occasions \14\ in order to prepare a rule filing seeking
permission to make the above described changes permanent. The Exchange
is currently still preparing such formal submission but does not expect
that filing to be completed and approved by the Commission before
September 30, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See supra note 2 [sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposal to Extend the Operation of the NMM Pilot
    NYSE Amex established the NMM Pilot to provide incentives for
quoting, to enhance competition among the existing group of liquidity
providers and add a new competitive market participant. The Exchange
believes that the NMM Pilot allows the Exchange to provide its market
participants with a trading venue that utilizes an enhanced market
structure to encourage the addition of liquidity, facilitate the
trading of larger orders more efficiently and operates to reward
aggressive liquidity providers. As such, the Exchange believes that the
rules governing the NMM Pilot should be made permanent. Through this
filing the Exchange seeks to extend the current operation of the NMM
Pilot until January 31, 2011, in order to allow the Exchange time to
formally submit a filing to the Commission to convert the pilot rules
to permanent rules.
2. Statutory Basis
    The basis under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'')
for this proposed rule change is the requirement under Section 6(b)(5)
that an exchange have rules that are designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange
believes that the instant filing is consistent with these principles
because the NMM Pilot provides its market participants with a trading
venue that utilizes an enhanced market structure to encourage the
addition of liquidity, facilitate the trading of larger orders more
efficiently and operates to reward aggressive liquidity providers.
Moreover, the instant filing requesting an extension of the NMM Pilot
will permit adequate time for: (i) The Exchange to prepare and submit a
filing to make the rules governing the NMM Pilot permanent; (ii) public
notice and comment; and (iii) completion of the 19b-4 approval process.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not:
    (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest;
    (ii) Impose any significant burden on competition; and
    (iii) Become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was
filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, it
has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \15\
and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the self-regulatory organization to submit to the
Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of
the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2010-86 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2010-86. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet website (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room on
official business

days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also
will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of
the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only informationthat you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSEAmex-2010-86 and should be submitted on or before September 30,
2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-22445 Filed 9-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 197 (Thursday, October 10, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54496-54498]
[FR Doc No: 2019-22185]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2019-0799]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Manasquan Inlet, Manasquan, NJ

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
certain waters of the Manasquan Inlet between Manasquan, NJ, and Point
Pleasant Beach, NJ. This action is necessary to protect event
participants, spectators, and vessels transiting the area from
potential hazards during the Manasquan Inlet Intercoastal Tug marine
event. During the enforcement period, unauthorized persons or vessels
are prohibited from entering into, remaining within, transiting
through, or anchoring in the safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Delaware Bay or a designated representative of the
Captain of the Port.

DATES: This rule is effective from noon to 2:30 p.m. on October 12,
2019.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0799 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket

Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Thomas Welker, U.S. Coast Guard; Sector
Delaware Bay, Waterways Management Division; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable and contrary to
the public interest to do so. There is insufficient time to allow for a
reasonable comment period prior to the date of the event. The rule must
be in force by October 12, 2019. The tug-of-war event will consist of
teams on opposing sides of the Manasquan Inlet with a rope extended
between the sides. The event will span the entire width of the inlet.
Vessel operation in the area of the event could be hazardous to both
event participants and vessels. We are taking immediate action to
ensure the safety of event participants and vessels operating in the
area.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest
because immediate action is needed to mitigate the potential safety
hazards associated with the marine event in this location.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Delaware Bay
(COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the rope
crossing the entire span of the waterway will be a safety concern for
anyone within a 400 feet of the tug-of-war rope. The purpose of this
rule is to ensure safety of vessels and the navigable waters in the
safety zone before, during, and after the scheduled event.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a temporary safety zone on the waters of the
Manasquan Inlet to be in effect from noon to 2:30 p.m. on October 12,
2019. The safety zone will cover all waters within 400 feet of the
event located between approximate locations 40[deg]06'09'' N,
74[deg]02'09'' W and 40[deg]06'14'' N, 74[deg]02'08'' W. During the
event, the inlet will be closed to all non-participant vessel traffic.
There is a 30-minute break tentatively planned for midway through the
event. If circumstances permit, during the break, the rope will be
removed from navigable waters and vessels may be allowed to transit
through the area at the discretion of the COTP or COTP's designated
representative. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative of the Captain of the Port. The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the safety zone by Broadcast Notice to Mariners and by on-
scene actual notice.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the regulated area. While this regulated area
will impact a designated area of the Manasquan River Inlet for two and
half hours, the event sponsor has organized a tentative 30-minute time
period during the event where vessels would be able to transit through
the inlet. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule will
allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone during the 30-minute
break period during the event.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
regulated area may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain

about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a determination that this action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the
human environment. This rule involves a temporary safety zone that
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within a
limited area on the navigable water of the Manasquan Inlet, during a
tug-of-war event lasting approximately two and a half hours. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) in
Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementing
Procedures 5090.1. A Record of Environmental Consideration (REC)
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T05-0799 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T05-0799  Safety Zone; Manasquan Inlet; Manasquan, NJ.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the Manasquan Inlet extending 400 feet from either side of a rope
located between approximate locations 40[deg]06'09'' N, 74[deg]02'09''
W and 40[deg]06'14'' N, 74[deg]02'08'' W. All coordinates are based on
World Geodetic System 1984.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard petty
officer, warrant or commissioned officer on board a Coast Guard vessel
or on board a federal, state, or local law enforcement vessel assisting
the Captain of the Port Delaware Bay (COTP) in the enforcement of the
safety zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter or remain in the zone, contact the
COTP or the COTP's representative via VHF-FM channel 16 or 215-271-
4807. Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.
    (3) This section applies to all vessels except those engaged in law
enforcement, aids to navigation servicing, and emergency response
operations.
    (d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local
agencies.
    (e) Enforcement period. This zone will be enforced on October 12,
2019, from on or after noon through on or before 2:30 p.m. on October
12, 2019.

    Dated: October 3, 2019.
Scott E. Anderson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Delaware Bay.
[FR Doc. 2019-22185 Filed 10-9-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P