[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 18 (Thursday, January 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 4237]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01592]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2020-0669; FRL-9498-01-OMS]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; Emission Guidelines for Sewage Sludge
Incinerators (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), Emission Guidelines for Sewage
Sludge Incinerators (EPA ICR Number 2403.06, OMB Control Number 2060-
0661), to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a
proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through
March 31, 2022. Public comments were previously requested via the
Federal Register on February 8, 2021 during a 60-day comment period.
This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A
fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated
burden and cost to the public. An agency may neither conduct nor
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before February 28,
2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OAR-2020-0669, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method)
or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
    Submit written comments and recommendations to OMB for the proposed
information collection within 30 days of publication of this notice to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information
collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for
Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Muntasir Ali, Sector Policies and
Program Division (D243-05), Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina, 27711; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC
West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC.
The telephone number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For
additional information about EPA's public docket, visit: https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: Owners and operators of sewage sludge incineration units
are required to comply with reporting and record keeping requirements
for the General Provisions (40 CFR part 60, subpart A), as well as for
the applicable standards in 40 CFR part 60, subpart MMMM and 40 CFR
part 62 subpart LLL. This includes submitting initial notifications,
performance tests and periodic reports and results, and maintaining
records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or
malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period
during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These reports are
used by the EPA to determine compliance with the standards.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Owners and operators of existing
sewage sludge incinerators.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart MMMM and 40 CFR part 62, subpart LLL).
    Estimated number of respondents: 86 (total).
    Frequency of response: Semiannually, annually.
    Total estimated burden: Respondent burden is 32,800 hours (per
year), while the State/local agency burden for administering the same
rule is 1,880 hours (per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: Respondent cost is $5,230,000 (per year);
this sum includes $1,350,000 annualized capital/startup and/or
operation & maintenance costs. State/local agency cost is $106,000 (per
year).
    Changes in the Estimates: There is no change in burden from the
most-recently approved ICR as currently identified in the OMB Inventory
of Approved Burdens for respondents. This situation is due to two
considerations: (1) The regulations have not changed over the past
three years and are not anticipated to change over the next three
years; and (2) the growth rate for this industry is very low or non-
existent, so there is no significant change in the overall burden.
Since there are no changes in the regulatory requirements and there is
no significant industry growth, there are also no changes in the
capital/startup and/or operation and maintenance (O&M) costs.
    This ICR also adjusts the number of respondents subject to the
requirements of Subpart MMMM which are implemented under State plans
and a Federal Plan to incorporate the burden associated with the
Federal Plan. The Federal Plan was finalized at 40 CFR part 62, subpart
LLL on April 29, 2016. As of June 3, 2021, the EPA data and the listing
of approved State plans in the eCFR indicates that 9 State and local
agencies enforce the State plans and the remainder of these SSI units
will be covered by the Federal Plan. The burden on State and local
agencies is included in respondent burden in this ICR, and is similar
to the Agency burden in the previous ICR.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-01592 Filed 1-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: August 30, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 168)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 50084-50085]
[DOCID:fr30au07-14]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R01-OAR-2007-0373; A-1-FRL-8461-4]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Connecticut; Establishment of Interim Progress for the Fine Particle
National Ambient Air Quality Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of Connecticut. This revision
proposes to establish early fine particulate (PM2.5)
transportation conformity emission budgets for the Connecticut portion
of the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT
PM2.5 nonattainment area. This action is being taken under
the Clean Air Act.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 1, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01-
OAR-2007-0373 by one of the following methods:
    1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for

submitting comments.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    4. Mail: ``EPA-R01-OAR-2007-0373'', Anne Arnold, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, One Congress
Street, Suite 1100 (mail code CAQ), Boston, MA 02114-2023.
    5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to: Anne Arnold,
Manager, Air Quality Planning Unit, Office of Ecosystem Protection,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office,
One Congress Street, 11th floor, (CAQ), Boston, MA 02114-2023. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours
of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding legal holidays.
    Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules
Section of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to
submit comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald O. Cooke, Air Quality Planning
Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional
Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (CAQ), Boston, MA 02114-2023,
telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules Section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this action
rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on
this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any
parties interested in commenting

on this action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA
receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this
rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the
rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not
the subject of an adverse comment.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is
located in the Rules Section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: August 20, 2007.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
 [FR Doc. E7-17002 Filed 8-29-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 62 (Tuesday, March 31, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17738-17742]
[FR Doc No: 2020-06640]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0538; Product Identifier 2012-NE-47-AD; Amendment
39-19885; AD 2020-06-16]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce, Deutschland Ltd. & Co. KG
(Formerly Rolls-Royce plc) Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD 2017-
03-02 for certain Rolls-Royce, Deutschland Ltd. & Co. KG RB211 Trent
768-60, 772-60, and 772B-60 model turbofan engines. AD 2017-03-02
required initial and repetitive ultrasonic inspections (UIs) of the
affected low-pressure (LP) compressor blades. This

AD requires initial and repetitive UIs of the affected LP compressor
blades and, depending on the results of the UIs, their replacement with
a part eligible for installation. This AD was prompted by LP compressor
blade partial airfoil release events. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective May 5, 2020.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of May 5, 2020.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Rolls-Royce, Deutschland Ltd. & Co. KG, Eschenweg 11, 15827
Blankenfelde-Mahlow, Germany; phone: +49 (0) 33 708 6 0; email: https://www.rolls-royce.com/contact-us.aspx. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also
available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0538.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0538; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this AD, the mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI),
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Elwin, Aerospace Engineer, ECO
Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-
238-7236; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The FAA issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM)
to amend 14 CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2017-03-02, Amendment 39-18793
(82 FR 10701, February 15, 2017), (``AD 2017-03-02''). AD 2017-03-02
applied to Rolls-Royce, Deutschland Ltd. & Co. KG (formerly Rolls-Royce
plc) RB211 Trent 768-60, 772-60, and 772B-60 turbofan engines, with LP
compressor blade, part number (P/N) FK23411, FK25441, FK25968, FW11901,
FW15393, FW23643, FW23741, FW23744, KH23403, or KH23404, installed. The
SNPRM published in the Federal Register on November 15, 2019 (84 FR
62482). The FAA preceded the SNPRM with an NPRM that published in the
Federal Register on August 14, 2018 (83 FR 40161). The NPRM proposed to
continue to require initial and repetitive UIs of the affected LP
compressor blades at a reduced interval. The SNPRM proposed to require
initial and repetitive UIs of the affected LP compressor blade and
replacement of the LP compressor blade with a part eligible for
installation if the LP compressor blade fails a UI. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
    The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the
Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has
issued EASA AD 2018-0188R1, dated September 5, 2018 (referred to after
this as ``the MCAI''), to address the unsafe condition on these
products. The MCAI states:

    Occurrences have been reported of LP compressor partial aerofoil
blade release events on RR Trent 700 engines. While primary
containment of the released sections was achieved in each case, some
of the releases did exhibit secondary effects that are considered to
present a potential hazard.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to LP
compressor blade release with possible consequent loss of the engine
nose cowl, under cowl fires and forward projection of secondary
debris, possibly resulting in damage to the aeroplane and/or injury
to persons on the ground.
    To address this potential unsafe condition, RR published NMSB
RB.211-72-G872, providing inspection instructions and, consequently,
EASA issued AD 2012-0247 to require a one-time inspection of the
higher life LP compressor blades. After identification of a
population of these LP compressor blades that were incorrectly
inspected, RR issued NMSB RB.211-72-H311 and, consequently, EASA
issued AD 2013-0060, retaining the requirements of EASA AD 2012-
0247, which was superseded, to require a one-time re-inspection of
the affected blades.
    After that AD was issued, to mitigate the risk of further
partial LP compressor blade release events, RR issued NMSB RB.211-
72-AH465, providing instructions for ultrasonic inspection of the
affected parts to detect sub-surface anomalies in the aerofoil.
Consequently, EASA issued AD 2014-0031, superseding [EASA] AD 2013-
0060, to require repetitive inspections of all affected LP
compressor blades and, depending on findings, replacement.
    Thereafter, EASA issued AD 2016-0141, retaining the requirements
of [EASA] AD 2014-0031, which was superseded, to reduce inspection
threshold (RR Alert NMSB RB.211-72-AH465 Revision 2). Prompted by
further analysis, EASA issued AD 2017-0241, retaining the
requirements of EASA AD 2016-0141, which was superseded, further
reducing the inspection threshold and interval (RR Alert NMSB
RB.211-72-AH465 Revision 4).
    Since EASA AD 2017-0241 was issued, RR issued the NMSB to
distinguish between standard operations and NSO and to determine the
applicable inspection threshold and interval. The flight cycles (FC)
accumulated by operators conducting NSO have to be calculated using
the beta factor shown in Table of the NMSB. The NMSB also
introduces, for engines that have accumulated more than 600 FC or
standard duty cycles (SDC, for engines used in NSO), a closing date
by which these have to be inspected at least once.
    For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2017-0241, which is superseded, and requires
implementation of the changes introduced.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0538.

Comments

    The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this AD. The following presents the comments received on the
SNPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Update Service Information

    Rolls-Royce plc (RR), American Airlines (American), and Delta Air
Lines (Delta) requested that RR Alert Non-Modification Service Bulletin
(NMSB) RB.211-72-AH465, Revision 6, dated November 29, 2019 (``the
NMSB''), be referenced in this AD instead of Revision 5 of the NMSB.
Delta and American commented Revision 6 offers an optional water-
coupled phased array inspection that provides a more reliable and
repeatable technique and increases detection sensitivity to identify
smaller defects. RR further commented that Revision 6 has been approved
by the European Aviation Safety Agency.
    The FAA agrees. RR published Revision 6 of the NMSB to allow an
alternative water-coupled phased array inspection. Operators may still
use the C-scan and gel-coupled phased array inspection techniques as
specified in Revision 6, or earlier versions, of the NMSB.

Request To Allow Use of Later Versions of Service Information

    Delta requested that this AD allow the use of later approved
revisions of RR Alert NMSB RB.211-72-AH465. Delta

indicated that this is something that has been achieved before in other
FAA ADs when an FAA AD incorporates by reference the EASA AD.
    The FAA disagrees. As set forth in Title 1 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 51.1(f), incorporation by reference of a
publication is limited to the edition of the publication that is
approved. Future amendments or revisions of the publication are not
included. Further, this AD does not incorporate by reference the EASA
AD.

Support for the AD

    The Air Line Pilots Association commented that it supports the AD
as proposed.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments
received, and determined that air safety and the public interest
require adopting this AD with the change described previously.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed RR Alert NMSB RB.211-72-AH465, Revision 6, dated
November 29, 2019. The NMSB describes procedures for performing a UI of
the LP compressor blades. This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 56 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry.
    The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspect LP compressor blade...........  44 work-hours x $85 per               $0          $3,740        $209,440
                                         hour = $3,740.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary
replacements that would be required based on the results of the
inspection. The FAA has no way of determining the number of engines
that might need this replacement.

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                    Action                                 Labor cost               Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace LP compressor blade (one blade per 77   6 work-hours x $85 per hour =           $103,000        $103,510
 engine sets).                                   $510.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. The FAA does not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, the FAA has included all costs in our cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2017-03-02, Amendment 39-18793 (82 FR 10701, February 15, 2017), and
adding the following new AD:

2020-06-16 Rolls-Royce, Deutschland Ltd. & Co. KG (formerly Rolls-
Royce plc): Amendment 39-19885; Docket No. FAA-2018-0538; Product
Identifier 2012-NE-47-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective May 5, 2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2017-03-02, Amendment 39-18793 (82 FR 10701,
February 15, 2017).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd. & Co. KG
(formerly Rolls-Royce plc) RB211 Trent 768-60, 772-60, and 772B-60
turbofan engines, with low-pressure (LP) compressor blade, part
number (P/N) FK23411, FK25441, FK25968, FW11901, FW15393, FW23643,
FW23741, FW23744, KH23403, or KH23404, installed.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7230, Turbine Engine
Compressor Section.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by LP compressor blade partial airfoil
release events. While released sections were contained in each case,
projection of secondary debris and effects could present a potential
hazard. The FAA is issuing this AD to prevent LP compressor blade
airfoil separation. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could
result in damage to the engine and damage to the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    (1) Within the compliance time specified in Figure 1 to
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD and thereafter, at intervals not to
exceed 1,200 flight cycles (FCs) or Standard Duty Cycles (SDCs) for
Non-Standard Operations (NSO), as applicable, since the last
ultrasonic inspection (UI), perform a UI of each affected LP
compressor blade in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions,
paragraph 3, of Rolls-Royce plc (RR) Alert Non-Modification Service
Bulletin (NMSB) RB.211-72-AH465, Revision 6, dated November 29,
2019.

    Note 1 to paragraph (g)(1):  Paragraph 1.D of RR Alert NMSB
RB.211-72-AH465, Revision 6, dated November 29, 2019, describes how
to determine the applicable SDCs. The Time Limits Manual (TLM), 05-
00-01, defines NSO.

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR31MR20.002

    (2) If, during any inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) of
this AD, a LP compressor blade is rejected by the UI, as defined in
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 3, of RR Alert NMSB RB.211-
72-AH465, Revision 6, dated November 29, 2019, before further
flight, or before returning the LP compressor blade to service,
whichever occurs first, remove the affected LP compressor blade from
service and replace with a part eligible for installation.

(h) Installation Prohibition

    After the effective date of this AD, do not install an affected
LP compressor blade on an engine unless the LP compressor blade
meets the conditions specified in paragraphs (h)(1) or (2) of this
AD, as applicable.
    (1) The affected part has not exceeded 1,200 FC or SDCs (for
NSO) since new, or since an inspection performed in accordance with
either RR Alert NMSB RB.211-72-AH465, Revision 6, dated, November
29, 2019, or with any of the service information referenced in
paragraph (j)(1) and (2) of this AD.
    (2) Prior to installation, the affected part has passed an
ultrasonic inspection in accordance with paragraph (g)(1) of this
AD.

(i) No Reporting Requirement

    The reporting requirements in the Accomplishment Instructions,
paragraph 3 of RR Alert NMSB RB.211-72-AH465, Revision 6, dated
November 29, 2019, are not required by this AD.

(j) Credit for Previous Actions

    You may take credit for LP compressor blade UIs required by
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, if you performed the UI before the
effective date of this AD using:
    (1) For initial inspections: RR NMSB RB.211-72-G702, dated May
23, 2011; RR NMSB RB.211-72-G872, Revision 2, dated March 8, 2013,
or earlier versions; RR NMSB RB.211-72-H311, dated March 8, 2013; RR
NMSB RB.211-72-AH465, Revision 5, dated July 26, 2018, or earlier
versions; RR Engine Manual E-Trent-1RR, Task 72-31-11-200-806; or
Airbus A330 Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM) Task 72-31-41-270-801,
or AMM Task 72-31-41-270-802.
    (2) For repetitive inspections: The instructions referenced in
the mandatory inspection paragraph of the applicable engine TLM,
provided the compliance times of this AD are not exceeded.

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
ECO Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. You may email your request to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(l) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Stephen Elwin,
Aerospace Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA, 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Refer to European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2018-0188R1, dated September 5, 2018, for more information. You may
examine the EASA AD in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating it in Docket No.
FAA-2018-0538.

(m) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.

    (i) Rolls-Royce plc (RR) Alert Non-Modification Service Bulletin
RB.211-72-AH465, Revision 6, dated November 29, 2019.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For RR service information identified in this AD, contact
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG, Eschenweg 11, 15827
Blankenfelde-Mahlow, Germany; phone: +49 (0) 33 708 6 0; email:
https://www.rolls-royce.com/contact-us.aspx.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Engine and
Propeller Standards Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA,
01803. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on March 26, 2020.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-06640 Filed 3-30-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: February 4, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 22)]
[Notices]
[Page 6045-6046]
[DOCID:fr04fe09-66]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[USCG-2008-1009]

Collection of Information Under Review by Office of Management
and Budget: OMB Control Number: 1625-0035

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Thirty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
request for comments announces that the U.S. Coast Guard is forwarding
an Information Collection Request (ICR), abstracted below, to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) requesting an extension of its approval for
the following collection of information: 1625-0035, Title 46 CFR
Subchapter Q: Lifesaving, Electrical, and Engineering Equipment,
Construction and Materials & Marine Sanitation Devices (33 CFR 159).
Our ICR describes the information we seek to collect from the public.
Review and comments by OIRA ensure we only impose paperwork burdens
commensurate with our performance of duties.

DATES: Please submit comments on or before March 6, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG-2008-1009] to the Docket Management Facility (DMF) at the
U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) or to OIRA. To avoid
duplication, please submit your comments by only one of the following
means:
    (1) Electronic submission. (a) To Coast Guard docket at http://
www.regulation.gov. (b) To OIRA by e-mail via: oira_
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Mail or Hand delivery. (a) DMF (M-30), DOT, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590-0001. Hand deliver between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-
366-9329. (b) To OIRA, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, to
the attention of the Desk Officer for the Coast Guard.
    (3) Fax. (a) To DMF,<PHONE_NUMBER>. (b) To OIRA at<PHONE_NUMBER>. To
ensure your comments are received in time, mark the fax to the
attention of the Desk Officer for the Coast Guard.
    The DMF maintains the public docket for this Notice. Comments and
material received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in
this Notice as being available in the docket, will become part of the
docket and will be available for inspection or copying at room W12-140
on the West Building Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also find the docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available from
Commandant (CG-611), U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, (Attn: Mr. Arthur
Requina), 2100 2nd Street SW., Washington, DC 20593-0001. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Arthur Requina, Office of
Information Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, for
questions on these documents. Contact Ms. Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations,<PHONE_NUMBER>, for questions on the docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard invites comments on whether
this ICR should be granted based on it being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the
collections; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the
collections; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
information subject to the collections; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of

collections on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
    Comments to Coast Guard or OIRA must contain the OMB Control Number
of the ICR. Comments to Coast Guard must contain the docket number of
this request, [USCG 2008-1009]. For your comments to OIRA to be
considered, it is best if they are received on or before the March 6,
2009.
    Public participation and request for comments: We encourage you to
respond to this request by submitting comments and related materials.
We will post all comments received, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov. They will include any personal information you
provide. We have an agreement with DOT to use their DMF. Please see the
paragraph on DOT's ``Privacy Act Policy'' below.
    Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include the
docket number [USCG-2008-1009], indicate the specific section of the
document to which each comment applies, providing a reason for each
comment. We recommend you include your name, mailing address, an e-mail
address, or other contact information in the body of your document so
that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
You may submit comments and material by electronic means, mail, fax, or
delivery to the DMF at the address under ADDRESSES; but please submit
them by only one means. If you submit them by mail or delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. In response to your comments, we
may revise the ICR or decide not to seek an extension of approval for
this collection. The Coast Guard and OIRA will consider all comments
and material received during the comment period.
    Viewing comments and documents: Go to http://www.regulations.gov to
view documents mentioned in this Notice as being available in the
docket. Enter the docket number [USCG-2008-1009] in the Search box, and
click, ``Go>>.'' You may also visit the DMF in room W12-140 on the West
Building Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
    Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments
received in dockets by the name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act
statement regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of
the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Previous Request for Comments

    This request provides a 30-day comment period required by OIRA. The
Coast Guard has published the 60-day notice (73 FR 60708, October 14,
2008) required by 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2). That notice elicited no
comments.

Information Collection Request

    Title: Title 46 CFR Subchapter Q: Lifesaving, Electrical, and
Engineering Equipment, Construction and Materials & Marine Sanitation
Devices (MSD) (33 CFR part 159).
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0035.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Affected Public: Manufacturers of safety equipment, materials and
marine sanitation devices.
    Abstract: Title 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3306, 3703, and 4302 authorize the
Coast Guard to establish safety equipment and material regulations.
Title 46 CFR parts 159 to 164 prescribe these requirements. Title 33
U.S.C. 1322 authorizes the Coast Guard to establish MSD regulations.
Title 33 CFR part 159 prescribes these rules. This information will be
used to determine whether manufacturers are in compliance with Coast
Guard regulations. When the Coast Guard approves any safety equipment,
material or MSD for use on a commercial vessel or pleasure craft, the
manufacturer is issued a Certificate of Approval.
    Forms: CGHQ-10030.
    Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has increased from 20,529
hours to 103,289 hours a year.

    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended.

    Dated: January 21, 2009.
D.T. Glenn,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Command,
Control, Communications, Computers and Information Technology.
[FR Doc. E9-2315 Filed 2-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 83 (Tuesday, April 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18274-18275]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08681]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EF14-8-001]

Western Area Power Administration; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on April 22, 2019, Western Area Power
Administration submitted tariff filing per: DSW_WestConnect_WAPA187-
20190422 to be effective 6/1/2019.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of

the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211,
385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a
party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or
before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not
necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other
than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the website that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
[email protected], or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 22, 2019.

    Dated: April 24, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-08681 Filed 4-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 243 (Monday, December 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 91995]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30377]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Regulation C, SEC File No. 270-68, OMB Control No. 3235-0074.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved
collection of information discussed below.
    Regulation C (17 CFR 230.400 through 230.498) under the Securities
Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) provides standard instructions for
persons filing registration statements under the Securities Act. The
information collected is intended to ensure the adequacy of information
available to investors. The information provided is mandatory.
Regulation C is assigned one burden hour for administrative convenience
because it does not directly impose information collection
requirements.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following Web site, www.reginfo.gov.
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30
days of this notice.

    Dated: December 6, 2016.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-30377 Filed 12-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52610-52611]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22563]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

Petition for Waiver of Compliance; Docket Number FRA-2018-0076

    Under part 211 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), this provides the public notice that by a document dated
September 7, 2018, the Canadian National Railway (CN) and its operating
subsidiaries petitioned the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for a
waiver of compliance from certain provisions of the Federal railroad
safety regulations contained at 49 CFR part 220. FRA assigned the
petition Docket Number FRA-2018-0076.
    Specifically, CN seeks a waiver of 49 CFR 220.307, Use of railroad-
supplied electronic devices, and 49 CFR 220.305, Use of personal
electronic devices, to permit its employees to use certain fitness
trackers while conducting their daily duties. The request pertains to
the railroad-supplied (or personally purchased but railroad-approved)
Virgin Pulse Max Pedometer and/or Virgin Pulse GoZone Pedometer (or
later models). CN states the risk of distraction

is minimized based on the devices' limited functionality and they are
an aspect of an important well-being program.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at the Department of Transportation's
(DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations Facility is open from 9
a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment and a public hearing, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Website: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays. Communications received by December 3, 2018
will be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable.
    Anyone can search the electronic form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better
inform its processes. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/
ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See also https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice for the
privacy notice of regulations.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-22563 Filed 10-16-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24865-24866]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08893]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-1021; Airspace Docket No. 21-ASO-9]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment and Removal of Air Traffic Service (ATS) Routes;
Eastern United States

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends three jet routes and removes one jet route
in the eastern United States. This action is associated with the
decommissioning of the Atlanta VHF Omnidirectional Range and Tactical
Air Navigation (VORTAC) system in support of the VHF Omnidirectional
Range (VOR) Minimum Operational Network (MON) to improve the efficiency
of the National Airspace System (NAS) and reduce dependency on ground-
based navigational systems.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, July 14, 2022. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11
and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Rules and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would modify the route structure as necessary to
preserve the safe and efficient flow of air traffic within the NAS.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking for Docket No.
FAA-2021-1021 in the Federal Register (86 FR 73205; December 27, 2021),
amending three jet routes and removing one jet route in the eastern
United States. Interested parties were invited to participate in this
rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal. No
comments were received.
    Jet routes are published in paragraph 2004 of FAA Order JO 7400.11F
dated August 10, 2021, and effective September 15, 2021, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The jet routes listed in this
document would be subsequently amended in, or removed, respectively,
from FAA Order JO 7400.11.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021, and effective September
15, 2021. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F lists Class
A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This action amends 14 CFR part 71 by amending J-4, J-45 and J-89
and removing J-239 in the eastern United States. This action is
associated with the planned decommissioning of the Atlanta VORTAC and
the VOR MON program by amending and removing certain jet route segments
that are being replaced by area navigation routing. Additionally, the
jet route changes reduce aeronautical chart clutter by removing
unneeded route segments.
    The route changes are as follows:
    J-4: J-4 currently extends between the Los Angeles, CA, (LAX)
VORTAC, and the Colliers, SC, (IRQ) VORTAC. The FAA is removing the
latter segment of the route from the Meridian, MS, (MEI) VORTAC to the
Colliers VORTAC. The amended route extends between the Los Angeles, CA,
(LAX) VORTAC and the Magnolia, MS, (MHZ) VORTAC.
    J-45: J-45 currently extends between the Atlanta, GA, VORTAC, and
the Aberdeen, SD, (ABR) VOR/Distance Measuring Equipment (VOR/DME).
This action removes the Atlanta, GA, (ATL) VORTAC from the initial
segment. The amended route extends between the Nashville, TN, (BNA)
VORTAC, and the Aberdeen, SD, (ABR) VOR/DME.
    J-89: J-89 currently extends between the Atlanta, GA, VORTAC, and
the Winnipeg, MB, Canada, (YWG) VORTAC. This action removes the
Atlanta, GA, (ATL) VORTAC in the initial segment. As amended, the route
extends between the Louisville, KY, (IIU) VORTAC, and the Winnipeg, MB,
Canada, (YWG) VORTAC. The portion within Canada is excluded.
    J-239: J-239 currently extends between the Atlanta, GA, (ATL)
VORTAC and the Meridian, MS, (MEI) VORTAC. The FAA is removing the
entire route.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated,
does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action of amending three jet
routes, removing one jet route, in the eastern United States qualifies
for categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and its implementing regulations at 40 CFR
part 1500, and in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures, paragraph 5-6.5a, which categorically
excludes from further environmental impact review rulemaking actions
that designate or modify classes of airspace areas, airways, routes,
and reporting points (see 14 CFR part 71, Designation of Class A, B, C,
D, and E Airspace Areas; Air Traffic Service Routes; and Reporting
Points); and paragraph 5-6.5b, which categorically excludes from
further environmental impact review ``Actions regarding establishment
of jet routes and Federal airways (see 14 CFR 71.15, Designation of jet
routes and VOR Federal airways) . . .''. As such, this action is not
expected to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts. In
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, paragraph 5-2 regarding
Extraordinary Circumstances, the FAA has reviewed this action for
factors and circumstances in which a normally categorically excluded
action may have a significant environmental impact requiring further
analysis. The FAA has determined no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an environmental assessment or
environmental impact study.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 2004 Jet Routes.

* * * * *

J-4 [Amended]

    From Los Angeles, CA, via INT Los Angeles 083[deg] and
Twentynine Palms, CA, 269[deg] radials; Twentynine Palms; Parker,
CA; Buckeye, AZ; San Simon, AZ; Newman, TX; Wink, TX; Abilene, TX;
Ranger, TX; Belcher, LA; to Magnolia, MS.
* * * * *

J-45 [Amended]

    From Nashville, TN; St Louis, MO; Kirksville, MO; Des Moines,
IA; Sioux Falls, SD; to Aberdeen, SD.
* * * * *

J-89 [Amended]

    From Louisville, KY; Boiler, IN; Northbrook, IL; Badger, WI;
Duluth, MN; to Winnipeg, MB, Canada. The portion within Canada is
excluded.
* * * * *

J-239 [Removed]

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 20, 2022.
Scott M. Rosenbloom,
Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2022-08893 Filed 4-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P