[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24443-24445]
[FR Doc No: 2018-11370]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0380]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Willamette River, Lake Oswego, OR

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
for certain waters of the Willamette River near Lake Oswego, OR. This
action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these
navigable waters during a fireworks display on July 4, 2018. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in
the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Columbia
River or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this
proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 13, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0380 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email LCDR Laura Springer, Waterways
Management Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On April 17, 2018, the City of Lake Oswego notified the Coast Guard
that it will be conducting a fireworks display from 10 p.m. to 10:30
p.m. on July 4, 2018, to commemorate Independence Day. The fireworks
will launch from a barge in the Willamette River approximately 150
yards east of George Rodgers Park in Lake Oswego, OR. Hazards from
firework displays include accidental discharge of fireworks, dangerous
projectiles, and falling hot embers or other debris. The Captain of the
Port Columbia River has determined that potential hazards associated
with the fireworks in this display are a safety concern for anyone
within a 450-yard radius of the barge.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters within a 450-yard radius of the fireworks
barge before, during, and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard
proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Captain of the Port Columbia River proposes to establish a
safety zone from 9 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. on July 4, 2018. The safety zone
would cover all navigable waters of the Willamette River within 450-
yards of a barge located at 45[deg]24'37.46'' N, 122[deg]39'29.70'' W,
in vicinity of George Rogers Park in Lake Oswego, OR. The duration of
the zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these
navigable waters before, during, and after the scheduled 10 p.m. to
10:30 p.m. fireworks display. No vessel or person would be permitted to
enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. The

regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
would be able to safely transit around this safety zone which would
impact a small designated area of the Willamette River for
approximately two hours during the evening when vessel traffic is
normally low. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice
to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule
would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, which guides the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves a safety zone lasting less than two and a half hours that
would prohibit entry within 450-yards of a fireworks barge. Normally
such actions are categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://

www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6 and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T13-0380 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T13-0380   Safety Zone; Willamette River, Lake Oswego, OR.

    (a) Safety zone. The following area is designated a safety zone:
Waters of the Willamette River, within a 450-yard radius of the
fireworks barge located at 45[deg]24'37.46'' N, 122[deg]39'29.70'' W in
vicinity of George Rogers Park in Lake Oswego, OR.
    (b) Regulations. In accordance with Sec.  165.23, no person may
enter or remain in this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port Columbia River or his designated representative. Also in
accordance with Sec.  165.23, no person may bring into, or allow to
remain in this safety zone any vehicle, vessel, or object unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Columbia River or his designated
representative.
    (c) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 9 p.m.
to 11:30 p.m. on July 4, 2018.

    Dated: May 22, 2018.
D.F. Berliner,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, Sector Columbia
River.
[FR Doc. 2018-11370 Filed 5-25-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34068]
[FR Doc No: E9-16544]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60251; File No. SR-NYSE-2009-55]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Granting Accelerated Approval to a Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule
70.25 To Permit All Available Contra-Side Liquidity To Trigger the
Execution of a d-Quote

July 7, 2009.
    On June 2, 2009, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend Rule 70.25 to permit all available
contra-side liquidity to trigger the execution of a d-Quote. The
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on June 11, 2009.\3\ The Commission received no comments regarding the
proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change on an
accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60045 (June 4,
2009), 74 FR 27854 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 70.25 to expand the categories
of liquidity that would be considered when determining whether the
contra-side volume is within the discretionary size range of the d-
Quote.\4\ Currently, only displayed interest is considered by Exchange
systems in determining whether the d-Quote is triggered. Under the
proposed rule change, all available contra-side interest at a possible
execution price of the d-Quote, including undisplayed liquidity, would
be considered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ A d-Quote is an e-Quote for which a Floor Broker enters
discretionary instructions as to size and/or price. See NYSE Rule
70.25(a)(i). An e-Quote is a broker agency interest file that a
Floor broker places within the Display Book system. See NYSE Rule
70(a)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its filing, the Exchange stated that this rule change would
provide Floor brokers with a similar functionality that was previously
available to Floor brokers with a CAP-DI order under former Rule
123A.30(a).\5\ Under that former rule, an elected CAP-DI order would
automatically execute against any contra-side volume available at the
electing price, and was eligible to participate in a sweep.\6\ The
Exchange also noted that, at the time the CAP order was eliminated, the
Exchange did not have the technology to replicate a similar
functionality with d-Quotes.\7\ Since that time, the Exchange has
introduced two new order types, the Minimum Display Reserve Order, and
the Non-Displayed Reserve Order.\8\ With the proposed rule change,
these two order types would be considered when determining whether
there is sufficient contra-side volume to trigger a d-Quote.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Notice at 27855.
    \6\ Id.
    \7\ Id.
    \8\ Id. See also NYSE Rule 13 (Definitions of Orders).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has carefully reviewed the proposed rule change and
finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements
of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a
national securities exchange \9\ including, in particular, Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ which requires that an exchange have rules
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because it would provide a d-Quote with access to both displayed
and undisplayed liquidity, the proposed rule change benefits Floor
brokers by allowing their d-Quotes to be triggered more often. This
proposal should also benefit customers by providing them with more
opportunities to have their non-displayed reserve orders receive
executions.
    The Commission also finds good cause to approve the proposed rule
change prior to the thirtieth day after publication in the  Federal
Register. The Commission notes that no comments were received during
the 21-day comment period. The Commission believes that the Exchange
has provided reasonable support for its representation that the
proposed rule change provides Floor brokers with a functionality
similar to that previously available with CAP-DI orders. In addition,
the potential benefits of this proposal to customers, such as the
increased opportunities for the execution of customer non-displayed
reserve orders, would be available sooner by approving this proposed
rule change on an accelerated basis. Therefore, the Commission finds
good cause, consistent with Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\11\ to approve
the proposed rule change on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,
that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2009-55) be, and it hereby is,
approved on an accelerated basis.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-16544 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11005-11006]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03779]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0142; Airspace Docket No. 20-AGL-7]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Big Rapids, MI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend the Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at Roben-Hood Airport, Big
Rapids, MI. The FAA is proposing this action as the result of an
airspace review caused by the cancellation and revision of the
instrument procedures at this airport. The geographic coordinates of
the airport would also be updated to coincide with the FAA's aeronautic
database. Airspace design is necessary for the safety and management of
instrument flight rules (IFR) operations at this airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 13, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone
(202) 366-9826, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2020-0142/Airspace Docket No. 20-AGL-7, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at https://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in
the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
    FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11D at NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Roben-Hood Airport, Big Rapids, MI, to support IFR
operations at this airport.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2020-0142/
Airspace Docket No. 20-AGL-7.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Federal Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and effective
September 15, 2019. FAA Order 7400.11D is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11D lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by amending the Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.6-mile radius
(decreased from a 6.7-mile

radius) of Roben-Hood Airport, Big Rapids, MI; removing the White Cloud
VORTAC and associated extensions from the airspace legal description;
and updating the geographic coordinates of the airport to coincide with
the FAA's aeronautic database.
    This action is the result of an airspace review caused by the
cancellation and revision of the instrument procedures at this airport.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.11D, dated August 8, 2019, and effective September 15,
2019, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and
effective September 15, 2019, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AGL MI E5 Big Rapids, MI [Amended]

Roben-Hood Airport, MI
    (Lat. 43[deg]43'22'' N, long 85[deg]30'15'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.6-mile radius of Roben-Hood Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on February 19, 2020.
Steve Szukala,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2020-03779 Filed 2-25-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P