[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35363-35369]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15120]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0232; Airspace Docket No. 11-AWA-3]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment to Class B Airspace; Seattle, WA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify Class B airspace in Seattle, WA
to contain aircraft conducting Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) approach
procedures to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA). This action
would further support the FAA's national airspace redesign goal of
optimizing terminal and en route airspace areas to enhance safety,
improving the flow of air traffic, and reducing the potential for near
midair collision in the terminal area.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 16, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2011-
0232 and Airspace Docket No. 11-AWA-3 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken McElroy, Airspace, Regulations and
ATC Procedures Group, Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2011-0232 and Airspace Docket No. 11-AWA-3) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at  http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Nos. FAA-2011-0232 and Airspace Docket No. 11-AWA-3.'' The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/rulemaking/recently_published/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. An
informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at
the office of the Western Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, 1601 Lind Ave., SW., Renton, WA 98057.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

Background

    In 1974, the FAA issued a final rule establishing the Seattle-
Tacoma, WA, Terminal Control Area (38 FR 17250). As a result of the
Airspace Reclassification final rule (56 FR 65638), which became
effective in 1993, the terms ``terminal control area'' and ``airport
radar service area'' were replaced by ``Class B airspace area'' and
``Class C airspace area,'' respectively. The primary purpose of a Class
B airspace area is to reduce the potential for midair collisions in the
airspace surrounding airports with high density air traffic operations
by providing an area, in which all aircraft are subject to certain
operating rules and equipment requirements.
    In recent years, Seattle has completed construction projects that
modernized the airport and added capacity at SEA.

These projects included the construction of a new Runway 16 L/R and 34
L/R, which increased the lateral distance between runways and allows
simultaneous arrival and departure operations under visual flight rules
(VFR) and simultaneous approaches during IFR conditions. Operationally,
using parallel dependent ILS approaches results in higher airport
arrival acceptance rates during IFR minimums, but requires aircraft to
be established on the final approach courses not less than 17 miles
from the airport. During periods of moderate air traffic, this
requirement quickly extends the final approach course to a distance
greater than 22 miles from the airport, which places the aircraft on
the approaches outside the confines of the current Seattle Class B
airspace.
    Since the Seattle Class B airspace area was established in 1974,
SEA has experienced increased traffic levels, a considerably different
fleet mix, and airport infrastructure improvements enabling
simultaneous instrument approach procedures. For calendar year 2009,
SEA documented 316,136 total operations and was rated number 16 among
all Commercial Service Airports with 15,273,092 passenger enplanements.
Under the current Class B airspace configuration, aircraft routinely
enter, exit, and then reenter Class B airspace while flying published
instrument approach procedures, which is contrary to FAA Order 7400.2,
Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters. In addition, SEA now utilizes
parallel dependent ILS approaches, which requires aircraft to be
established on final at least 17 miles from the airport. This results
in aircraft exceeding the lateral boundaries of the current Class B
airspace by up to 5 to 10 miles during moderate levels of air traffic.
FAA modeling of existing traffic flows has shown that expanded Class B
airspace extensions would enhance safety by containing all instrument
approach procedures and associated traffic patterns within the confines
of Class B airspace, and better segregate IFR aircraft arriving/
departing SEA and VFR aircraft operating in the vicinity of Seattle
Class B airspace. The proposed Class B airspace modifications described
in this NPRM are intended to address these issues.

Pre-NPRM Public Input

    In 2010, the FAA initiated action to form an Ad Hoc Committee to
provide comments and recommendations regarding the planned
modifications to the Seattle Class B airspace area. The Washington
State Department of Transportation chaired the Ad Hoc Committee;
participants included representatives of air carrier, Aircraft Owners
and Pilot Association, general aviation, corporate, helicopter,
government agencies with aviation interests, military and law
enforcement airspace users. The Ad Hoc Committee responded in July 2010
and provided a proposed modification of the Seattle Class B airspace
area to the FAA Seattle Terminal Radar Approach Control Facility
(TRACON).
    In addition, and as announced in the Federal Register (75 FR
60352), three informal airspace meetings were held on December 9, 2010,
at the Snohomish County Auditorium, Everett, WA; December 14, 2010, at
the Highline Performing Arts Center, Burien, WA; and December 16, 2010,
at the Theater at Auburn Mountainview, Auburn, WA.
    These meetings provided interested airspace users with an
opportunity to present their views and offer suggestions regarding the
planned modification of the Seattle Class B airspace. All comments
received as a result of the informal airspace meetings, along with the
recommendations made by the Ad Hoc Committee, were considered in
developing this proposal.

Ad Hoc Committee and Other Recommendations

    The Ad Hoc Committee recommended a design with two ceilings: 7,000
feet MSL in the outer areas and 10,000 feet MSL for the inner areas.
The FAA analyzed the recommendation and found that due to local terrain
the recommendation had merit. Maintaining a classic Class B design
similar to the current one would make the design more complex and use
more airspace than necessary to protect SEA arrivals and departures.
    In reaching this recommendation, the Ad Hoc Committee considered
non-participating aircraft possibly crossing the ends of the airspace
at 7,500 feet, but the presence of nonparticipating aircraft in close
proximity to Class B airspace is not unique to SEA. Also, the committee
discussed whether a non-traditional design might be confusing or
difficult to navigate around, and concluded that it was not.
    After the Ad Hoc Committee's report was submitted to the TRACON,
Seattle TRACON recommended adding to the original proposal by expanding
Area F from 2,000 feet to 10,000 feet to the northwest to cover Puget
Sound west of Elliott Bay and the residential area over Magnolia Bluff.
This would encompass the Boeing Field/King County International Airport
(BFI) Instrument Landing System runway 13R final approach course in the
Class B airspace. Numerous Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System
(TCAS) events with large and heavy jet aircraft have been reported in
this area.
    Since BFI traffic is in close proximity to SEA traffic in a south
flow, such TCAS events have immediate repercussions on SEA traffic,
particularly if the aircraft responding to a TCAS Resolution Advisory
climbs into the path of traffic on the SEA final. This situation
impacts SEA traffic, and expanding the Class B airspace in this area
may be a potential solution.
    In the current Class B airspace configuration, the area over the
water west of the northwest corner of Area D and Magnolia Bluff itself
is beneath a 3,000 foot to 10,000 foot shelf. This proposal would lower
the floor of Class B to 2,000 feet on either side of the BFI runway 13R
final approach course. Area D over BFI would remain exactly the same as
in the current airspace configuration.
    Ninety-six comments were received during the public meetings
requesting the elimination of the 2,000 foot proposal over Magnolia due
to increased noise and air pollution. These comments also disagreed
with the need to change airspace, argued the inconvenience of public
meeting location, and contended that the airspace changes would
increase aircraft noise disturbance to nesting birds. A petition from
the Magnolia community was submitted with 862 signatures attached.
    Based on the public comments received, the FAA concedes that
effective alternatives exist for achieving the increased safety that
was the objective of lowering the airspace floor. Therefore, the FAA
intends to examine alternative, nonregulatory (procedural) means to
reducing the TCAS events. The FAA will stress efforts toward increased
enforcement and pilot education, and improved procedures, and, only if
appropriate, pursue a regulatory solution in the Seattle Magnolia area.

Informal Airspace Meeting Comments

    Several comments were received indicating a preference to retain
the classic VOR radial/DME description methods for the Seattle Class B
airspace area.
    Initially, the FAA considered a classic description method but it
would result in a design that used more airspace than necessary to
contain SEA traffic. The primary description methodology is using
geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude). Wherever possible,
however, the airspace corners, intersections and more central, lower

altitude pieces are described in multiple ways, including the VOR
radial/DME method.
    Three commenters requested a reduction in the Class B airspace
around the Enumclaw glider area/Bergseth Airport (private).
    The FAA agrees that the proposed airspace would cause a hardship
for glider flights returning to the Bergseth Airport. The final
proposed airspace has been adjusted to mitigate the impact.
    Two commenters stated the proposed airspace design will ``squeeze''
or ``trap'' VFR aircraft on the edges of the Class B.
    The FAA agrees with these comments, and the two areas specified--on
the northeast and southeast corners of the proposed airspace--have been
reshaped to mitigate this concern.
    Two commenters believed the VFR corridors must be retained and
usable.
    The proposed design will require a slight modification to the VFR
flyways.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to modify the SEA Class B airspace area.
This action (depicted on the attached chart) proposes to revise the
Class B airspace while maintaining some existing features familiar to
local users. Overall, it reduces the size of the Seattle Class B
airspace by approximately 194 square miles. Containing two different
ceiling altitudes, the Class B proposal expands the eastern boundary to
ensure containment of turbojet aircraft, but eliminates excessive outer
(arrival route) wings that currently extend to 30 nautical miles (NM).
Where possible, this proposal also aligns certain Class B boundaries
with existing Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range Navigational
Aids and geographical features resulting in improved boundary
definition. This would make navigation around and through the airspace
easier for a variety of aviation interests, even though it consists of
primary boundary portrayal using latitude and longitude points (GPS
waypoints). The following are the proposed revisions for each area of
the SEA Class B airspace:
    Area A. 2 NM arc northeast of SEA would be straightened and
realigned with the border of Class D airspace. The area just south of
SEA would be moved slightly to the west to better contain arrivals to
SEA runway 34L/departures from 16R. This runway 34L/16R was recently
constructed and commissioned in 2008. Its extended centerline to the
south is just barely contained within the current Class B airspace.
There is no other traffic in this area except SEA traffic.
    Area B. No change.
    Area C. Southeast corner would be moved to the west, and floor of
airspace would be raised from 1,600 feet to 1,800 feet.
    Area D. No change.
    Area E. Southeast border of airspace would be moved slightly to the
west.
    Area F. No change.
    Area G. 2 NM arc northeast of SEA would be straightened and
realigned with the border of Class D airspace.
    Area H. Entire airspace would be moved east slightly. Northern and
southern boundaries are depicted as angles instead of curves.
    Area I. Floor would be lowered to 4,000 feet. Area would be
narrowed and described with straight lines instead of curved lines.
    Area J. New area would join existing areas that had floors of 5,000
feet.
    Area K. New area with floor of 5,000 feet.
    Area L. Area would be narrowed and described with straight lines
instead of curved lines.
    Area M. Area would be expanded slightly on the northeast and
southeast corners and described with straight lines instead of curved
lines.
    Area N. New area floor would be raised from 3,000 feet to 4,000
feet in part of area, and lowered from 5,000 feet to 4,000 feet in part
of area. Boundary would be described by straight lines.
    Area O. Area would be considerably smaller. Floor would be lowered
from 6,000 feet to 5,000 feet in part of the area, and raised from
3,000 feet to 5,000 feet in part of area. Ceiling would be lowered from
10,000 feet to 7,000 feet.
    Area P. Area would be considerably smaller. Floor would be lowered
from 6,000 feet to 5,000 feet in part of the area and raised from 3,000
feet to 5,000 feet in part of area. Ceiling would be lowered from
10,000 feet to 7,000 feet.
    Area Q. Area would be reshaped with straight lines instead of
curved lines. Floor would be lowered from 6,000 feet and 8,000 feet to
5,000 feet. Ceiling would be lowered from 10,000 feet to 7,000 feet.
    Area R. Size of area would be significantly reduced and described
by straight lines instead of curved lines.
    Area S. Area would be reshaped with straight lines instead of
curved lines.
    Area T. Area would be reshaped with straight lines instead of
curved lines. Ceiling would be lowered from 10,000 feet to 7,000 feet.
These changes are being proposed to ensure the containment of IFR
aircraft within Class B airspace as required by FAA directives.
    All radials listed in the SEA Class B airspace description in this
NPRM are stated in degrees relative to both True North and Magnetic
North.
    Class B airspace areas are published in paragraph 3000 of FAA Order
7400.9U, dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15, 2010, and
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class B airspace area
proposed in this document would be published subsequently in the Order.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires
that the FAA consider the impact of paperwork and other information
collection burdens imposed on the public. We have determined that there
is no new information collection requirement associated with this
proposed rule.

Regulatory Evaluation Summary

    Changes to Federal regulations must undergo several economic
analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 directs that each Federal agency
shall propose or adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned determination
that the benefits of the intended regulation justify its costs. Second,
the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) requires
agencies to analyze the economic impact of regulatory changes on small
entities. Third, the Trade Agreements Act (Pub. L. 96-39) prohibits
agencies from setting standards that create unnecessary obstacles to
the foreign commerce of the United States. In developing U.S.
standards, the Trade Act requires agencies to consider international
standards and, where appropriate, that they be the basis of U.S.
standards. Fourth, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-4) requires agencies to prepare a written assessment of the costs,
benefits, and other effects of proposed or final rules that include a
Federal mandate likely to result in the expenditure by State, local, or
Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more annually (adjusted for inflation with base year of
1995). This portion of the preamble summarizes the FAA's analysis of
the economic impacts of this proposed rule.
    Department of Transportation Order DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies
and procedures for simplification, analysis, and review of regulations.
If the expected cost impact is so minimal that a proposed or final rule
does not warrant a full evaluation, this order permits that a statement
to that effect and the basis for it be included in the preamble if a
full regulatory evaluation of the cost and benefits is not prepared.
Such a determination has been made for

this proposed rule. The reasoning for this determination follows.
    After consultation with a diverse cross-section of stakeholders
that participated in the Ad Hoc Committee to develop the
recommendations contained in this proposal, and a review of the
recommendations and comments, the FAA expects that this proposed rule
would result in minimal cost. This proposed rule would enhance safety
by containing all instrument approach procedures, and associated
traffic patterns, within the confines of Class B airspace and better
segregate IFR aircraft arriving/departing SEA and VFR aircraft
operating in the vicinity of the Seattle Class B airspace.
    This NPRM would enhance safety, reduce the potential for a midair
collision in the Seattle area and would improve the flow of air
traffic. As such, we estimate a minimal impact with substantial
positive net benefits. The FAA requests comments with supporting
justification about the FAA determination of minimal impact. The FAA
has, therefore, determined that this proposed rule is not a
``significant regulatory action'' as defined in section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, and is not ``significant'' as defined in DOT's
Regulatory Policies and Procedures.

Regulatory Flexibility Determination

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) (RFA)
establishes ``as a principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall
endeavor, consistent with the objectives of the rule and of applicable
statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions
subject to regulation. To achieve this principle, agencies are required
to solicit and consider flexible regulatory proposals and to explain
the rationale for their actions to assure that such proposals are given
serious consideration.'' The RFA covers a wide-range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
    Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a rule will
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. If the agency determines that it will, the agency must
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis as described in the RFA.
    However, if an agency determines that a rule is not expected to
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, section 605(b) of the RFA provides that the head of the
agency may so certify and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. The certification must include a statement providing the
factual basis for this determination, and the reasoning should be
clear.
    The FAA believes the proposal would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities as the economic impact
is expected to be minimal. We request comments from the potentially
affected small businesses.
    Therefore, the FAA certifies that this proposed rule would not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.

International Trade Impact Assessment

    The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as amended by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465), prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing standards or engaging in related activities
that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United
States. Pursuant to these Acts, the establishment of standards is not
considered an unnecessary obstacle to the foreign commerce of the
United States, so long as the standard has a legitimate domestic
objective, such as the protection of safety, and does not operate in a
manner that excludes imports that meet this objective. The statute also
requires consideration of international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for U.S. standards. The FAA has
assessed the potential effect of this proposed rule and determined that
it would enhance safety and is not considered an unnecessary obstacle
to trade.

Unfunded Mandates Assessment

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4) requires each Federal agency to prepare a written statement
assessing the effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final
agency rule that may result in an expenditure of $100 million or more
(in 1995 dollars) in any one year by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector; such a mandate
is deemed to be a ``significant regulatory action.'' The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of $143.1 million in lieu of $100
million. This proposed rule does not contain such a mandate; therefore,
the requirements of Title II of the Act do not apply.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9U, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15,
2010, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 3000 Subpart B--Class B airspace.

* * * * *

ANM WA B Seattle, WA [Modified]

Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Primary Airport)
    (Lat. 47[deg]27'00'' N., long. 122[deg]18'42'' W.)
Seattle VORTAC (SEA)
    (Lat. 47[deg]26'07'' N., long. 122[deg]18'35'' W.)

Boundaries

    Area A. That airspace extending upward from the surface to and
including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line beginning
at the 3.6-mile DME on the SEA 007[deg](T)/348[deg](M) radial to a
point on the 4-mile arc of the sea 007[deg](T)/348[deg](M) radial,
then counterclockwise along the 4-mile arc to the sea 326[deg](T)/
306[deg](M) radial to the Puget Sound shoreline, then south along
the Puget Sound shoreline to the 2-mile arc of the SEA VORTAC, then
counterclockwise along the 2-mile arc of the SEA VORTAC to the sea
202[deg](T)/183[deg](M) radial extending to the 4-mile DME on the
SEA 197[deg](T)/178[deg](M) radial, then extending to the 6-mile DME
on the sea 192[deg](T)/173[deg](M) radial, then counterclockwise
along the 6-mile arc of the SEA VORTAC to the SEA 163[deg](T)/
144[deg](M) radial extending to the 4-mile DME on the SEA VORTAC
159[deg](T)/140[deg](M) radial, extending to the 2-mile arc of the
SEA VORTAC 146[deg](T)/127[deg](M) radial, then counterclockwise
along the 2-mile arc of SEA VORTAC to the SEA VORTAC 069[deg](T)/
050[deg](M) radial to the point of beginning.
    Area B. That airspace extending upward from 1,100 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the 4-mile DME point on the SEA 007[deg](T)/348[deg](M)
radial extending to the 6-mile arc of the sea 007[deg](T)/
348[deg](M) radial, then counterclockwise along the 6-mile arc of
the SEA VORTAC to the SEA 342[deg](T)/323[deg](M) radial to the 4-
mile arc of the SEA 342[deg](T)323[deg](M) radial, then clockwise
along the 4-mile arc of the SEA VORTAC to the point of beginning.

    Area C. That airspace extending upward from 1,800 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the 6-mile DME on the SEA 192[deg](T)/173[deg](M)
radial to the 12-mile arc of the SEA 192[deg](T)/173[deg](M) radial,
then counterclockwise along the 12-mile arc of the SEA VORTAC to the
SEA 166[deg](T)/147[deg](M) radial extending to the 8-mile DME on
the SEA 163[deg](T)/144[deg](M) radial to a point on the 6-mile arc
of the SEA 163[deg](T)/144[deg](M) radial, then clockwise along the
6-mile arc of the SEA VORTAC to the point of beginning.
    Area D. That airspace extending upward from 1,800 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the 6-mile arc of the SEA 007[deg](T)/348[deg](M)
radial, then counterclockwise along the 6-mile arc of the SEA VORTAC
to the SEA 342[deg](T)/323[deg](M) radial, then to the 12-mile arc
of the SEA 342[deg](T)/323[deg](M) radial, then clockwise along the
12-mile arc of the SEA VORTAC to the SEA 007[deg](T)/348[deg](M)
radial to the point of beginning.
    Area E. That airspace extending upward from 2,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the 4-mile arc of the SEA 197[deg](T)/178[deg](M)
radial, then clockwise along the 40-mile arc of the SEA VORTAC to
the SEA 326[deg](T)/307[deg](M) radial, then south along the Puget
Sound shoreline to the 2-mile arc of the SEA VORTAC then
counterclockwise along the 2-mile arc of the SEA VORTAC to the SEA
202[deg](T)/183[deg](M) radial to the point of beginning.
    Area F. That airspace extending upward from 2,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the 4-mile DME on the SEA 342[deg](T)/323[deg](M)
radial extending north on the SEA 342[deg](T)/323[deg](M) radial to
the Puget Sound shoreline, then south along the Puget Sound
shoreline to the 4-mile DME on the SEA VORTAC 326[deg](T)/
307[deg](M) radial, then clockwise along the 4-mile arc of SEA
VORTAC to the point of beginning.
    Area G. That airspace extending upward from 2,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the 3.6 DME on the SEA 007[deg](T)/348[deg](M) radial
extending to the 12-DME on the SEA 007[deg](T)/348[deg](M) radial,
then clockwise along the 12-mile arc of the SEA VORTAC to the SEA
022[deg](T)/003[deg](M) radial to the 4-mile arc of the SEA VORTAC,
then clockwise along the 4-mile arc of the SEA VORTAC to the SEA
159[deg](T)/140[deg](M) radial to the 2-mile DME on the SEA VORTAC
146[deg](T)/127[deg](M) radial, then counterclockwise along the 2-
mile arc to the SEA VORTAC 069[deg](T)/050[deg](M) radial to the
point of beginning.
    Area H. That airspace extending upward from 3,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the 20-mile DME on the SEA VORTAC 338[deg](T)/
319[deg](M) radial east to the 20-mile DME on the SEA VORTAC
023[deg](T)/004[deg](M) radial, then southeast along the 16-mile DME
on the SEA VORTAC 032[deg](T)/013[deg](M) radial south to the 12-
mile DME on the SEA VORTAC 135[deg](T)/116[deg](M) radial, then
southwest to the 18.3 mile DME on the SEA VORTAC 157[deg](T)/
138[deg](M) west to the 18-mile DME on the SEA VORTAC 200[deg](T)/
181[deg](M) radial, then northwest to the 15-mile DME on the SEA
VORTAC 212[deg](T)/193[deg](M) radial north to the 18-mile DME on
the SEA VORTAC 335[deg](T)/316[deg](M) radial to the point of
beginning, excluding that airspace in the areas A through G.
    Area I. That airspace extending upward from 4,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a point
47[deg]48'13''/122[deg]27'59'' (SEA 344[deg](T)/325[deg](M) at
23NM), clockwise to a point 47[deg]47'59''/122[deg]08'02'' (SEA
018[deg](T)/359[deg](M) radial at 23NM), to a point 47[deg]44'31''/
122[deg]07'00'' (SEA 023[deg](T)/004[deg](M) radial at 20NM), to a
point 47[deg]44'39''/122[deg]29'41'' (SEA 338[deg](T)/319[deg](M)
radial at 20NM) to the point of beginning.
    Area J. That airspace extending upward from 5,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a point
47[deg]39'31''/122[deg]05'41'' (SEA 033[deg](T)/014[deg](M) at
16NM), clockwise to a point 47[deg]37'49''/121[deg]59'59'' (SEA
047[deg](T)/028[deg](M) radial at 17.2NM), to a point
47[deg]17'36''/122[deg]00'04'' (124[deg](T)/105[deg](M) radial at
15.2NM), to a point 47[deg]17'38''/122[deg]06'07'' (SEA 135[deg](T)/
116[deg](M) radial at 12NM) to the point of beginning.
    Area K. That airspace extending upward from 5,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by: a point
47[deg]38'53''/122[deg]36'14'' (SEA 317[deg](T)/298[deg](M) radial
at 17.5NM), to a point 47[deg]13'24''/122[deg]30'14'' (SEA
212[deg](T)/193[deg](M) radial at 15NM), to a point 47[deg]16'09''/
122[deg]36'01'' (SEA 230[deg](T)/211[deg](M) radial at 15.5NM) to
the point of beginning.
    Area L. That airspace extending upward from 6,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a point
47[deg]39'00''/122[deg]43'03'' (SEA 308[deg](T)/289[deg](M) radial
at 21NM), clockwise to a point 47[deg]38'53''/122[deg]36'14'' (SEA
317[deg](T)/298[deg](M) radial at 17.5NM), to a point
47[deg]16'09''/122[deg]36'01'' (SEA 230[deg](T)/211[deg](M) radial
at 15.5NM), to a point 47[deg]18'46''/122[deg]42'45'' (SEA
246[deg](T)/227[deg](M) radial at 18NM) to the point of beginning.
    Area M. That airspace extending upward from 6,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a point
47[deg]37'49''/121[deg]59'59'' (SEA 047[deg](T)/028[deg](M) radial
at 17.2NM), clockwise to a point 47[deg]36'45''/121[deg]56'03'' (SEA
055[deg](T)/036[deg](M) radial at 18.6NM), to a point
47[deg]35'39''/121[deg]51'58'' (SEA 062[deg](T)/043[deg](M) radial
at 20.4NM), to a point 47[deg]18'18''/121[deg]51'40'' (SEA
113[deg](T)/094[deg](M) radial at 19.9NM), to a point
47[deg]17'28''/121[deg]55'42'' (SEA 119[deg](T)/100[deg](M) radial
at 17.8NM), to a point 47[deg]17'36''/122[deg]00'04'' (SEA
124[deg](T)/105[deg](M) radial at 15.2NM) to the point of beginning.
    Area N. That airspace extending upward from 4,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by: a point
47[deg]09'13''/122[deg]27'36'' (SEA 200[deg](T)/181[deg](M) radial
at 18NM), clockwise to a point 47[deg]09'17''/122[deg]08'06'' (SEA
157[deg](T)/138[deg](M) radial at 18.3NM), to a point 47'06'16''/
122[deg]08'34'' (SEA 161[deg](T)/142[deg](M) radial at 21NM), to a
point 47[deg]06'20''/122[deg]26'21'' (SEA 195[deg](T)/176[deg](M)
radial at 20.5NM to the point of beginning.
    Area O. That airspace extending upward from 5,000 feet MSL to
and including 7000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a point
47[deg]18'46''/122[deg]42'45'' (SEA 246[deg](T)/227[deg](M) radial
at 18NM), clockwise to a point 47[deg]16'09''/122[deg]36'01'' (SEA
230[deg](T)/211[deg](M) radial at 15.5NM), to a point
47[deg]13'24''/122[deg]30'14'' (SEA 212[deg](T)/193[deg](M) radial
at 15NM), to a point 47[deg]09'13''/122[deg]27'36'' (SEA
200[deg](T)/181[deg](M) radial at 18NM), to a point 47[deg]06'20''/
122[deg]26'21'' (SEA 195[deg](T)/176[deg](M) radial at 20.5NM), to a
point 47[deg]02'35''/122[deg]30'26'' (SEA 199[deg](T)/180[deg](M)
radial at 24.9NM), to a point 47[deg]10'55''/122[deg]40'04'' (SEA
224[deg](T)/205[deg](M) radial at 21.1NM) to the point of beginning.
    Area P. That airspace extending upward from 5,000 feet MSL to
and including 7000 feet MSL within an area bounded by: a point
47[deg]17'38''/122[deg]06'07'' (SEA 135[deg](T)/116[deg](M) radial
at 12NM), clockwise to a point 47[deg]17'36''/122[deg]00'04'' (SEA
124[deg](T)/105[deg](M) radial at 15.2NM), to a point
47[deg]17'28''/121[deg]55'42'' (SEA 119[deg](T)/100[deg](M) radial
at 17.8NM), to a point 47[deg]14'03''/121[deg]58'57'' (SEA
132[deg](T)/113[deg](M) degree radial at 18NM), to a point
47[deg]11'46''/121[deg]58'59'' (SEA 137[deg](T)/118[deg](M) radial
at 19.6NM), to a point 47[deg]02'38''/122[deg]06'04'' (SEA
160[deg](T)/141[deg](M) radial at 25NM), to a point 47[deg]06'16''/
122[deg]08'34'' (SEA 161[deg](T)/142[deg](M) radial at 21NM), to a
point 47[deg]09'17''/122[deg]08'06'' (SEA 157[deg](T)/138[deg](M)
degree radial at 18.3NM) to the point of beginning.
    Area Q. That airspace extending upward from 5,000 feet MSL to
and including 7,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by: a point
47[deg]51'15''/122[deg]30'00'' (SEA 343[deg](T)/324[deg](M) radial
at 26.3NM), clockwise to a point 47[deg]51'09''/122[deg]05'46'' (SEA
019[deg](T)/360[deg](M) radial at 26.5NM), to a point 47[deg]41'54'/
121[deg]55'57'' (SEA 044[deg](T)/025[deg](M) radial at 22NM), to a
point 47[deg]36'45''/121[deg]56'03'' (SEA 055[deg](T)/036[deg](M)
radial at 18.6NM), to a point 47[deg]37'49''/121[deg]59'59'' (SEA
047[deg](T)/028[deg](M) radial at 17.2NM), to a point
47[deg]39'31''/122[deg]05'41'' (SEA 033[deg](T)/014[deg](M) radial
at 16NM), to a point 47[deg]44'31''/122[deg]07'00'' (SEA
023[deg](T)/004[deg](M) radial at 20NM), to a point 47[deg]47'59''/
122[deg]08'02'' (SEA 018[deg](T)/359[deg](M) radial at 23NM) to a
point 47[deg]48'13''/122[deg]27'59'' (SEA 344[deg](T)/325[deg](M)
radial at 23NM), to a point 47[deg]44'39''/122[deg]29'41'' (SEA
338[deg](T)/319[deg](M) radial at 20NM), to a point 47[deg]42'25''/
122[deg]29'50'' (SEA 335[deg](T)/316[deg](M) radial at 18NM), to a
point 47[deg]38'53''/122[deg]36'14'' (SEA 317[deg](T)/298[deg](M)
radial at 17.5NM), to a point 47[deg]39'00''/122[deg]43'03'' (SEA
308[deg](T)/289[deg](M) radial at 21NM) to the point of beginning.
    Area R. That airspace extending upward from 6,000 feet MSL to
and including 7,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a point
47[deg]55'27''/122[deg]27'04'' (SEA 349[deg](T)/330[deg](M) radial
29.9NM), clockwise to a point 47[deg]55'31''/122[deg]08'29'' (SEA
013[deg](T)/354[deg](M) radial at 30.2NM), to a point
47[deg]51'09''/122[deg]05'46'' (SEA 019[deg](T)/360[deg](M) radial
at 26.5NM), to a point 47[deg]51'15''/122[deg]30'00'' (SEA
343[deg](T)/324[deg](M) radial at 26.3NM) to the point of beginning.
    Area S. That airspace extending upward from 5,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a point
47[deg]06'20''/122[deg]26'21'' (SEA 195[deg](T)/176[deg](M) radial
at 20.5NM), clockwise to a point 47[deg]06'16''/122[deg]08'34'' (SEA
161[deg](T)/142[deg](M) radial at 21NM), to a point 47[deg]02'38''/
122[deg]06'04'' (SEA 160[deg](T)/141[deg](M) radial at 25NM), to a
point 47[deg]02'35''/122[deg]30'26'' (SEA 199[deg](T)/180[deg](M)
radial at 24.9NM) to the point of beginning.
    Area T. That airspace extending upward from 6,000 feet MSL to
and including 7,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a point
47[deg]02'35''/122[deg]30'26'' (SEA 199[deg](T)/180[deg](M) radial
at 24.9NM), clockwise to a point 47[deg]02'38''/122[deg]06'04'' (SEA
160[deg](T)/141[deg](M) radial at 25NM), to a point 46[deg]57'13''/
122[deg]08'03'' (SEA 166[deg](T)/147[deg](M) radial at 29.8NM), to a
point

46[deg]57'05''/122[deg]27'35'' (SEA 192[deg](T)/173[deg](M) radial
at 29.7NM) to the point of beginning.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 13, 2011.
Gary Norek,
Acting Manager, Airspace, Regulations and ATC Procedures Group.
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP17JN11.013

[FR Doc. 2011-15120 Filed 6-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-C


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 69760]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27304]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4470-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2019-0001]

Mississippi; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-4470-DR), dated December 6,
2019, and related determinations.

DATES: The declaration was issued December 6, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated December 6, 2019, the President issued a major disaster
declaration under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the
``Stafford Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State
of Mississippi resulting from a severe storm, straight-line winds,
and flooding on October 26, 2019, is of sufficient severity and
magnitude to warrant a major disaster declaration under the Robert
T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C.
5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford Act''). Therefore, I declare that such
a major disaster exists in the State of Mississippi.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Public Assistance in the
designated areas and Hazard Mitigation throughout the State.
Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance be
supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation will be limited to 75
percent of the total eligible costs.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, Jose M. Girot, of FEMA is appointed
to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major disaster.
    The following areas of the State of Mississippi have been
designated as adversely affected by this major disaster:

    Alcorn, Covington, Itawamba, Jasper, Jefferson Davis, Leake,
Lee, Marion, Neshoba, Newton, Pontotoc, Prentiss, Scott, Simpson,
Smith, and Tippah Counties for Public Assistance.
    All areas within the State of Mississippi are eligible for
assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2019-27304 Filed 12-18-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P