[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 41 (Monday, March 2, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 12383]
[FR Doc No: 2020-04172]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0946]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Pilot Records
Improvement Act of 1996/Pilot Record Database

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the following collection of information was
published on December 26, 2019. This collection involves the pilot/
applicant's name, home address which is provided by the applicant, and
his/her FAA certificate number. In most cases, the certificate number
is one that has been assigned by Airmen Certification. The information
collected is imperative to be able to identify the airman in order to
process the required background check for the potential hiring air
carrier employer.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by April 1, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed to the attention of the Desk Officer, Department of
Transportation/FAA, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW, Washington,
DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Morris by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0607.
    Title: Pilot Records Improvement Act of 1996/Pilot Record Database.
    Form Numbers:

FAA 8060-10 FAA RECORDS REQUEST (PRIA)
FAA 8060-10 AIRMAN NOTICE AND RIGHT TO RECEIVE COPY--FAA RECORDS (PRIA)
FAA 8060-11 AIR CARRIER AND OTHER RECORDS REQUEST (PRIA)
FAA 8060-11A AIRMAN NOTICE AND RIGHT TO RECEIVE COPY--AIR CARRIER AND
OTHER RECORDS (PRIA)
FAA 8060-12 AUTHORIZATION FOR RELEASE OF DOT DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING
RECORDS UNDER PRIA AND MAINTAINED UNDER TITLE 49 CODE OF FEDERAL
REGULATIONS (49 CFR) PART 40
FAA 8060-13 NATIONAL DRIVER REGISTER RECORDS REQUEST (PRIA)
FAA FORM 8060-XX PILOT CONSENT/REVOCATION FOR AIR CARRIER ACCESS TO
PILOT RECORDS DATABASE

    Type of Review: Revision of an information collection.
    Background: The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the following collection of information
was published on December 26, 2019 (2019-27707). This notice includes
an updated burden analysis. The Pilot Records Improvement Act of 1996
(PRIA) as amended, was enacted to ensure that part 121, 125 and 135 air
carriers and air operators adequately investigate a pilot's background
before allowing that pilot to conduct commercial air carrier flights
for their company. Under PRIA, a hiring employer cannot place a pilot
into service until they obtain, review and approve the pilot's
background and other safety-related records for the past 5 year period
as specified in PRIA. The FAA information disclosed under PRIA are
medical and airman certificate verifications as well as any closed
enforcement and revocation data. The air carrier information disclosed
under PRIA are those concerning pilot performance and training,
disciplinary actions and removal from service, and drug and alcohol
testing records. Records from the Department of Motor Vehicles of any
particular State would include records of drug and alcohol convictions.
PRIA request forms can be received by fax or mail; however, the most
common method is by email attachment, one pilot/applicant per form.
Each 8060-10 form will include all information needed to process the
requested PRIA report. FAA Form 8060-xx is being added to this
collection to allow pilots to release their FAA records to a hiring
aviation employer when they cannot release the records themselves via
the PRD website. Use of FAA Form 8060-xx is not required if FAA Form
8060-10 is used or if the pilot releases the records themselves via the
PRD website. The specific form number is not yet determined. In
addition to the forms, information is collected via a website to allow
interested persons to register in MyAccess. MyAccess is a user-
management and identity verification service used to control who has
access to the PRD.
    Respondents: The PRIA representative at each part 121, 125 and 135
air carrier is responsible for completing, forwarding, receiving and
providing the air carrier with the completed PRIA report so the air
carrier can make a more informed hiring decision concerning each pilot/
applicant. One complete PRIA package is required for every pilot/
applicant. The FAA processes approximately 24,120 PRIA packages per
year from respondents.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 2.13 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 96,871 hours.

    Issued in Oklahoma City, OK, on February 25, 2020.
Christopher Morris,
PRD/PRIA Program Manager, Regulatory Support Division, Flight Standards
Service, Office of Aviation Safety AFS-620.
[FR Doc. 2020-04172 Filed 2-28-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 10, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32928-32929]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14663]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2014-D-1747]

Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies: Modifications and
Revisions; Guidance for Industry; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a final guidance for industry entitled ``Risk
Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies: Modifications and Revisions.''
This guidance provides information on how FDA will define and process
submissions for modifications and revisions of risk evaluation and
mitigation strategies (REMS), as well as information on what types of
changes to approved REMS will be considered modifications or revisions
of the REMS. The guidance also provides instructions to application
holders related to procedures for submission of REMS modifications and
revisions to FDA as well as different timeframes for FDA's review of
and action on such changes. The definitions of REMS modifications and
revisions apply to all types of REMS. This guidance updates the
guidance of the same name, issued April 7, 2015, including finalizing
the portion that sets forth the submission procedures for REMS
revisions.

DATES: The announcement of the guidance is published in the Federal
Register on July 10, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may submit either electronic or written comments on
Agency guidances at any time as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2014-D-1747 for ``Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies:
Modifications and Revisions.'' Received comments will be placed in the
docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets
Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
    You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
    Submit written requests for single copies of this guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave., Hillandale
Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, or the Office of
Communication, Outreach, and Development, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing
your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the guidance document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vaishali Jarral, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, Rm. 6480, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-4248; or Stephen Ripley, Center for

Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
240-402-7911.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance for industry
entitled ``Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies: Modifications and
Revisions.'' This guidance provides information on what types of
changes to approved REMS will be considered modifications of the REMS
and what types of changes will be considered revisions. (See section
505-1(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 355-1(h)).) This guidance also provides information on how REMS
modifications and revisions should be submitted to FDA and how FDA
intends to review and act on these submissions.
    If FDA determines that a REMS is necessary to ensure that the
benefits of a drug outweigh its risks, FDA is authorized to require a
REMS for such drugs under section 505-1 of the FD&C Act.\1\ Section
505-1(g) and (h) of the FD&C Act include provisions for the assessment
and modification of an approved REMS. Section 505-1(h) of the FD&C Act
requires FDA to review and act on proposed minor modifications, as
defined in guidance, within 60 days.\2\ It also requires FDA to
establish, through guidance, that ``certain modifications'' can be
implemented following notification to FDA. (See section 505-
1(h)(2)(A)(iv) of the FD&C Act.) In addition, FDA is required to review
and act on REMS modifications to conform the REMS to approved safety
labeling changes, or to a safety labeling change that FDA has directed
the application holder to make pursuant to section 505(o)(4) of the
FD&C Act within 60 days. (See section 505-1(h)(2)(A)(iii) of the FD&C
Act.) Finally, section 505-1(g)(4)(A) of the FD&C Act specifies that
proposed REMS modifications no longer require submission of a REMS
assessment; instead, proposed modifications must include an adequate
rationale for the proposed changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Section 505-1 of the FD&C Act applies to applications for
prescription drugs submitted under subsection 505(b) (i.e., new drug
applications) or (j) (i.e., abbreviated new drug applications) of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355(b) or (j), respectively) and
applications under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act
(i.e., biologics license applications).
    \2\ See section 505-1(h)(2)(A)(ii) of the FD&C Act. Section
1132(c) of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation
Act also provides that FDA will issue guidance that, for purposes of
section 505-1(h)(2)(A) of the FD&C Act, describes the types of
modifications to approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategies
that are considered to be minor modifications of such strategies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This guidance updates the guidance of the same name, issued April
7, 2015 (80 FR 18629), and finalizes the portion that sets forth the
submission procedures for REMS revisions. FDA carefully considered all
comments received, including comments on the submission procedures
portion, and revised the guidance as appropriate.
    This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
current thinking of FDA on ``Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies:
Modifications and Revisions.'' It does not establish any rights for any
person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable
statutes and regulations. This guidance is not subject to Executive
Order 12866.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This final guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). REMS
modifications are submitted to FDA as supplements to approved new drug
applications (NDAs) under 21 CFR 314.70 and for abbreviated new drug
applications (ANDAs) under 21 CFR 314.97, and for approved biologics
license applications (BLAs) under 21 CFR 601.12. Burden hours for NDAs
and ANDAs are approved by OMB under control number 0910-0001, and for
BLAs under control number 0910-0338. REMS revisions are submitted to
FDA as application correspondence and are also approved by OMB under
control numbers 0910-0001 and 0910-0338.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the internet may obtain the guidance at
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information/guidances-drugs, https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information-biologics/biologics-guidances, or
https://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: July 3, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-14663 Filed 7-9-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: April 16, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 74)]
[Notices]
[Page 20625]
[DOCID:fr16ap08-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD08-8-000]

Demand Response in Organized Electric Markets; Notice of
Technical Conference

April 10, 2008.
    Take notice that on May 21, 2008, Commission staff will convene a
technical conference to consider issues related to demand response in
organized electric markets, as discussed in the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking issued in Docket Nos. RM07-19-000 and AD07-7-000. Wholesale
Competition in Regions with Organized Electric Markets, 122 FERC ]
61,167, at P 95 (2007). The technical conference will be held from 9 am
to 5 pm (EDT), in the Commission Meeting Room at the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. All
interested persons are invited to attend. Telephone participation will
not be available.
    Issues that will be examined at the technical conference include:
the value of demand response in organized markets; comparable
compensation of demand response in organized markets; barriers to
comparable treatment of demand response that have not previously been
identified; solutions to eliminate such barriers; and the need for and
the ability to standardize terms, practices, rules and procedures
associated with demand response. A further notice with detailed
information will be issued in advance of the conference.
    Commission staff is now soliciting nominations for speakers at the
technical conference. Persons wishing to nominate themselves as
speakers should do so using the following electronic link: https://
www.ferc.gov/whats-new/registration/demand-response-05-21-speaker-
form.asp. Such nominations must be made before the close of business on
April 23, 2008, so that an agenda for the technical conference can be
drafted and published.
    A free webcast of this event is available through www.ferc.gov.
Anyone with Internet access who desires to view this event can do so by
navigating to the Calendar of Events at www.ferc.gov and locating this
event in the Calendar. The event will contain a link to its webcast.
The Capitol Connection provides technical support for the free
webcasts. It also offers access to this event via television in the
Washington, DC area and via phone-bridge for a fee. If you have any
questions, visit www.CapitolConnection.org or contact Danelle Perkowski
or David Reininger at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Transcripts of the conference will be available immediately for a
fee from Ace Reporting Company<PHONE_NUMBER> or 1-800-336-6646). They
will be available for free on the Commission's eLibrary system and on
the Calendar of Events approximately one week after the conference.
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please
send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll free 1-866-208-
3372 (voice) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a FAX to<PHONE_NUMBER> with
the required accommodations.
    For more information about this conference, please contact:
Ryan Irwin, Office of Energy Market Regulation, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,
(202) 502-6454<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Elizabeth Arnold, Office of the General Counsel--Energy Markets,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-8151 Filed 4-15-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 43 (Thursday, March 5, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11887-11890]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04489]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2014-0810; FRL-9923-94-Region 4]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Tennessee;
Emissions Statement Requirement for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve a revision to the Tennessee state
implementation plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Tennessee, through
the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) on
January 5, 2015, to address the emissions statement requirements for
the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).
The revision affects Davidson, Rutherford, Shelby, Sumner, Knox,
Blount, Anderson, Williamson, and Wilson Counties. Annual emissions
statements are required for certain sources in all ozone nonattainment
areas. These changes address requirements for the Knoxville, Tennessee
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS nonattainment area (hereinafter referred to as
the Knoxville Area) and the Tennessee portion of the Memphis,
Tennessee-Arkansas-Mississippi 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS nonattainment
area (hereinafter referred to as the Memphis Area). The Knoxville Area
is comprised of Knox and Blount County, and a portion of Anderson
County, Tennessee, and the Tennessee portion of the Memphis Area is
comprised of Shelby

County, Tennessee. Davidson, Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson, Wilson and
the remaining portion of Anderson County are not part of an ozone
nonattainment area.

DATES: This direct final rule is effective May 4, 2015 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by April 6, 2015. If EPA
receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2014-0810, by one of the following methods:
    1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    4. Mail: ``EPA-R04-OAR-2014-0810,'' Air Regulatory Management
Section (formerly the Regulatory Development Section), Air Planning and
Implementation Branch (formerly the Air Planning Branch), Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960.
    5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Air
Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch,
Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional
Office's normal hours of operation. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R04-OAR-
2014-0810. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or
email, information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane Spann, Air Regulatory Management
Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Ms. Spann
can be reached at<PHONE_NUMBER> and via electronic mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On March 12, 2008, EPA promulgated a revised 8-hour ozone NAAQS of
0.075 parts per million (ppm). See 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008). Under
EPA's regulations at 40 CFR part 50, the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS is
attained when the 3-year average of the annual fourth highest daily
maximum 8-hour average ambient air quality ozone concentrations is less
than or equal to 0.075 ppm. 40 CFR 50.15. Ambient air quality
monitoring data for the 3-year period must meet a data completeness
requirement. The ambient air quality monitoring data completeness
requirement is met when the average percent of days with valid ambient
monitoring data is greater than 90 percent, and no single year has less
than 75 percent data completeness as determined in Appendix I of part
50.
    Upon promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, the Clean Air Act (CAA
or Act) requires EPA to designate as nonattainment any area that is
violating the NAAQS, based on the three most recent years of ambient
air quality data at the conclusion of the designation process. The
Knoxville Area was designated nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS on April 30, 2012 (effective July 20, 2012) using 2009-2011
ambient air quality data. See 77 FR 30088 (April 30, 2012). At the time
of designation, the Knoxville Area was classified as a Marginal
nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The Memphis Area
was designated nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS on April
30, 2012 (effective July 20, 2012) using 2008-2010 ambient air quality
data. See 77 FR 30088 (April 30, 2012). At the time of designation, the
Memphis Area was classified as a Marginal nonattainment area for the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
    Based on these nonattainment designations, Tennessee was required
to develop SIP revisions addressing ozone nonattainment requirements of
the CAA for the Knoxville and Memphis Areas. Specifically, pursuant to
CAA section 182(a)(3)(B), Tennessee was required to submit a SIP
revision addressing emissions statements for these two Areas.
    Ground level ozone is not emitted directly into the air, but is
created by chemical reactions between oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the presence
of sunlight. Emissions from industrial facilities and electric
utilities, motor vehicle exhaust, gasoline vapors, and chemical
solvents are some of the major sources of NOX and VOC.
Section 182(a)(3)(B) of the CAA requires each state with ozone
nonattainment areas to submit a SIP revision requiring annual emissions
statements to be submitted to the state by the owner or operator of
each NOX or VOC stationary source located within a
nonattainment area, showing the actual emissions of NOX

and VOC from that source.\1\ The first statement is due three years
from the area's nonattainment designation, and subsequent statements
are due at least annually thereafter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ A state may waive the emission statement requirement for any
class or category of stationary sources which emit less than 25 tons
per year of VOCs or NOX if the state meets the
requirements of section 182(a)(3)(B)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 5, 2015, Tennessee submitted a SIP revision revising its
existing Rule 1200-03-18-.02, ``General Provisions and Applicability,''
which amends its emissions statement requirements to address the
Knoxville and Memphis Areas under CAA section 182(a)(3)(B). EPA is now
taking action to approve this SIP revision as meeting the requirements
of sections 110 and 182(a)(3)(B) of the CAA for those Areas. More
information on EPA's analysis of Tennessee's SIP revision is provided
below.

II. Analysis of the State's Submittal

    Tennessee's January 5, 2015, submission seeks to modify its SIP to
reflect recent changes to the emissions statement requirements in State
Rule 1200-03-18-.02(8). EPA initially approved this state regulation
into Tennessee's SIP in 1995. See 60 FR 10504 (February 27, 1995). At
that time, the regulation applied to stationary sources within
Davidson, Rutherford, Shelby, Sumner, Williamson, and Wilson Counties.
Tennessee modified State Rule 1200-03-18-.02(8) in 2014 to include
Anderson, Blount, and Knox counties; clarify that all owners or
operators of stationary sources with actual emissions of 25 tons per
year or more of VOC or NOX within these nine counties must
generate emissions statements; and allow subject sources in counties
that operate their own air pollution program to send these statements
to the local permitting authority rather than to the Technical
Secretary of the Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board. EPA has
determined that this amended regulation meets all of the requirements
of CAA section 182(a)(3)(B) for the Knoxville and Memphis Areas because
it covers the counties within those nonattainment areas and satisfies
the applicability, certification, and other emissions statement
criteria contained therein.

III. Final Action

    EPA is approving Tennessee's January 5, 2015, SIP revision
addressing emissions statement requirements because the State's
submission meets the requirements of sections 110 and 182 of the CAA.
EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the Agency
views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should adverse
comments be filed. This rule will be effective May 4, 2015 without
further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by April 6,
2015.
    If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public
is advised that this rule will be effective on May 4, 2015 and no
further action will be taken on the proposed rule.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by May 4, 2015. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules

section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: February 13, 2015.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

    Therefore, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart RR--Tennessee

0
2. In Sec.  52.2220, table 1 in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry ``Section 1200-3-18-.02'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.2220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                   Table 1--EPA Approved Tennessee Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          State
         State citation              Title/subject      effective    EPA approval date         Explanation
                                                           date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Chapter 1200-3-18 Volatile Organic Compounds
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
Section 1200-3-18-.02...........  General Provisions    12/18/2014  3/5/2015 [Insert     Adds Knox, Blount, and
                                   and Applicability.                Federal Register     Anderson County to
                                                                     citation].           Emissions Statement
                                                                                requirement
                                                                                applicability;
                                                                                clarifies that 25 tons
                                                                                or more NOX sources
                                                                                are required to submit
                                                                                in addition to VOC
                                                                                sources; and allows
                                                                                subject sources to
                                                                                send statements to the
                                                                                local permitting
                                                                                authority rather than
                                                                                to the Technical
                                                                                Secretary of the
                                                                                Tennessee Air
                                                                                Pollution Control
                                                                                Board.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-04489 Filed 3-4-15; 08:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 3 (Friday, January 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 729]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31733]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9767-6; CERCLA-04-2012-3780]

Ellman Battery Superfund Site; Orlando, Orange County, FL; Notice
of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States
Environmental Protection Agency has entered into an Ability To Pay
settlement to recover outstanding cost from two parties concerning a
previous Removal Action at the Ellman Battery Superfund Site located in
Orlando, Orange County, Florida.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until
February 4, 2013. The Agency will consider all comments received and
may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments
received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the
settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V.
Painter. Submit your comments by Site name Ellman Battery Superfund
Site by one of the following methods:
     www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/programs/enforcement/enforcement.html.
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 61 Forsyth Street
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: December 10, 2012.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund
Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-31733 Filed 1-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: August 16, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 158)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 45973-45976]
[DOCID:fr16au07-27]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-28989; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-070-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) that applies to certain Boeing Model 747-200B, 747-200C,
747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, and 747SP series airplanes. The existing AD
currently requires doing a detailed inspection of the left and right
longeron extension fittings, and corrective action if necessary. This
proposed AD would add airplanes to the applicability of the existing
AD. This proposed AD results from reports that accidental drilling
damage to the longeron extension fittings was found on airplanes not
subject to the existing AD. We are proposing this AD to detect and
correct accidental drilling damage of the

longeron extension fittings, which could lead to cracking of the
longeron extension fittings and result in rapid decompression of the
airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 1, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
     DOT Docket Web site: Go to http://dms.dot.gov and follow

the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
 and follow the instructions for sending your

comments electronically.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Hand Delivery: Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for service information identified in this
proposed AD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivan Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``Docket No.
FAA-2007-28989; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-070-AD'' at the
beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the
proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://dms.dot.gov
, including any personal information you provide. We will

also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of
that web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or may
can visit http://dms.dot.gov.

Examining the Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov
, or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is located on the
ground floor of the West Building at the DOT street address stated in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after the Docket Management System receives them.

Discussion

    On April 28, 2006, we issued AD 2006-10-04, amendment 39-14588 (71
FR 27592, May 12, 2006), for certain Boeing Model 747-200B, 747-200C,
747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, and 747SP series airplanes. That AD
requires doing a detailed inspection of the left and right longeron
extension fittings, and corrective action if necessary. That AD
resulted from cracking found in the longeron extension fitting at body
station 1480 due to accidental damage during production. We issued that
AD to detect and correct cracking in the longeron extension fitting,
which could result in rapid decompression of the airplane.

Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued

    Since we issued AD 2006-10-04, we received reports that accidental
drill damage was discovered during inspections of the longeron
extension fittings of five airplanes not subject to that AD, including
one airplane manufactured before the airplanes specified in the
effectivity of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2515, dated October
20, 2005 (cited in AD 2006-10-04 as the appropriate source of service
information). Boeing therefore concluded that additional airplanes
which might be subject to the unsafe condition should be added to the
effectivity of a revision of that service bulletin.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2515,
Revision 1, dated March 1, 2007. Revision 1 of the alert service
bulletin is essentially the same as the original issue, except that
airplanes have been added to its effectivity.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to develop on other airplanes of the
same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD, which
would supersede AD 2006-10-04 and would retain certain requirements of
the existing AD. The proposed AD would also add airplanes to the
applicability of the existing AD. The proposed AD would remove the
reporting requirement of the existing AD. The proposed AD would also
require accomplishing the actions specified in the service information
described previously, except as discussed under ``Difference Between
the Proposed AD and the Service Bulletin.''

Difference Between the Proposed AD and the Service Bulletin

    The service bulletin specifies to contact the manufacturer for
instructions on how to repair certain conditions, but this proposed AD
would require repairing those conditions in one of the following ways:
     Using a method that we approve; or
     Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by an Authorized Representative
for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization
Organization whom we have authorized to make those findings.

Interim Action

    We consider this proposed AD interim action. If final action is
later identified, we may consider further rulemaking then.

Costs of Compliance

    There are about 876 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This proposed AD would affect about 156 airplanes of
U.S. registry.
    The actions specified by this proposed AD were previously required
by AD 2006-10-04, which was applicable to approximately 25 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The actions required by that AD take about 1 work hour
per airplane. We estimated the cost of the current requirements of that
AD on U.S. operators to be $2,000, or $80 per airplane. Some operators
of the 25 airplanes subject to AD 2006-10-04 may have already initiated
the required actions. This proposed AD would add

no new costs associated with those airplanes.
    This proposed AD would be applicable to approximately 131
additional airplanes of U.S. registry. New actions required by this
proposed AD would take about 1 work hour per airplane. Based on the
current labor rate of $80 per work hour, we estimate the new costs
imposed by this proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $10,480, or $80 per
airplane. This figure is based on assumptions that no operator of these
additional airplanes has yet done any of the proposed requirements of
this AD, and that no operator would do those actions in the future if
this AD were not adopted.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec.  39.13 by
removing amendment 39-14588 (71 FR 27592, May 12, 2006) and adding the
following new airworthiness directive (AD):

BOEING: Docket No. FAA-2007-28989; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
070-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by October
1, 2007.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2006-10-04.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B
SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-
400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes, certificated in any
category; as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2515, Revision 1, dated March 1, 2007.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from reports that accidental drilling damage
to the longeron extension fittings was found on airplanes not
subject to the existing AD. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct accidental drilling damage of the longeron extension
fittings, which could lead to cracking of the longeron extension
fittings and result in rapid decompression of the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Restatement of Certain Requirements of AD 2006-10-04

Detailed Inspection

    (f) For Group 1 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2515, Revision 1, dated March 1, 2007: At the
applicable compliance time specified in paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2)
of this AD, do a detailed inspection of the left and right longeron
extension fittings for damage, and, before further flight, do the
corrective action if applicable, by accomplishing all the applicable
actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2515, dated October 20, 2005; or Revision 1,
dated March 1, 2007.

    Note 1: Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2515, dated October
20, 2005; and Revision 1, dated March 1, 2007; refer to Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2390, Revision 1, dated July 6, 2000, as an
additional source of service information for replacing a damaged
longeron fitting with a new longeron extension fitting.

    (1) For airplanes that have accomplished the inspection of the
splice area for cracking as specified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2390, dated July 31, 1997; or Revision 1, dated July
6, 2000: Inspect in accordance with paragraph (f) of this AD before
the airplane has accumulated 10,000 total flight cycles, or within
1,000 flight cycles after June 16, 2006 (the effective date of AD
2006-10-04), whichever is later.
    (2) For airplanes that have not accomplished the inspection of
the splice area for cracking as specified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2390, dated July 31, 1997; or Revision 1, dated July
6, 2000: Inspect in accordance with paragraph (f) of this AD before
the airplane has accumulated 10,000 total flight cycles, or within
250 flight cycles after June 16, 2006, whichever is later.

New Requirements of This AD

Detailed Inspection of Additional Airplanes

    (g) For Group 2 and Group 3 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2515, Revision 1, dated March 1, 2007:
Except as provided by paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD, at the
applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2515, Revision 1, dated March 1, 2007, do a detailed
inspection of the left and right longeron extension fittings for
damage and, before further flight, do the corrective action, as
applicable; by accomplishing all the applicable actions specified in
the Accomplishment Instructions of the alert service bulletin.

Compliance Times

    (h) Where the alert service bulletin specifies compliance times
relative to the release date of the alert service bulletin, this AD
requires compliance at compliance times relative to the effective
date of this AD.

Repair of Certain Conditions

    (i) If any damage is found during any inspection required by
this AD and the service bulletin specifies to contact Boeing for
appropriate action: Before further flight, repair the damage using a
method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (k) of this AD.

Credit for Actions Done Using Previous Service Information

    (j) Actions done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2515, dated
October 20, 2005, are considered acceptable for

compliance with the corresponding actions of this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (k)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 2006-10-04,
are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this AD.
    (3) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
    (4) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this
AD.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 30, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E7-16121 Filed 8-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 91 (Friday, May 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 22134]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09623]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP17-3-000]

Dominion Carolina Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review of the Line A Abandonment Project

    On October 13, 2016, Dominion Carolina Gas Transmission, LLC
(Dominion Carolina) filed an application in Docket No. CP17-003-000
requesting a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity pursuant
to Section 7(b) and 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act and Part 157 of the
Commission's regulations to discontinue natural gas service and abandon
natural gas pipelines and aboveground facilities in York, Chester,
Lancaster, and Kershaw Counties, South Carolina. Dominion Carolina's
proposed abandonment is referred to as the Line A Abandonment Project
(Project).
    On October 25, 2016, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission or FERC) issued its Notice of Application for the Project.
Among other things, that notice alerted agencies issuing federal
authorizations of the requirement to complete all necessary reviews and
to reach a final decision on a request for a federal authorization
within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's
Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Project. This instant notice
identifies the FERC staff's planned schedule for the completion of the
EA for the Project.

Schedule for Environmental Review

Issuance of EA............................  June 30, 2017.
90-day Federal Authorization Decision       September 28, 2017.
 Deadline.

    If a schedule change becomes necessary, additional notice will be
provided so that the relevant agencies are kept informed of the
Project's progress.

Project Description

    Dominion Carolina's Line A was originally installed in 1958 and now
has integrity issues. The underground pipeline would be capped, filled
with nitrogen, and abandoned in place. The pipeline to be abandoned
includes 55 miles of 10-inch-diameter pipeline in York, Chester,
Lancaster, and Kershaw Counties and 5 miles of 12-inch-diameter
pipeline in York County. In addition three farm taps would be removed
and aboveground facilities (including valves, regulators, or meters)
would be removed at seven existing meter stations.
    Dominion Carolina would also install new taps, piping, meters, and
regulators at 12 existing meter stations in order to transfer the
current feeds off of Line A into the its Line A-1-A pipeline.

Background

    On February 7, 2017, the Commission issued a Notice of Intent to
Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Line A Abandonment
Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues (NOI). The NOI
was sent to affected landowners; federal, state, and local government
agencies; elected officials; environmental and public interest groups;
Native American tribes; other interested parties; and local libraries
and newspapers. In response to the NOI, the Commission received
comments from the Muscogee Nation, the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, the
Eastern Band of the Cherokee Indians Tribal Historic Preservation
Office, and a landowner. The comments primarily concerned cultural
resources.

Additional Information

    In order to receive notification of the issuance of the EA and to
keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in specific dockets,
the Commission offers a free service called eSubscription. This can
reduce the amount of time you spend researching proceedings by
automatically providing you with notification of these filings,
document summaries, and direct links to the documents. Go to
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.
    Additional information about the Project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs at (866) 208-FERC or on the
FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov). Using the ``eLibrary'' link, select
``General Search'' from the eLibrary menu, enter the selected date
range and ``Docket Number'' excluding the last three digits (i.e.,
CP17-3), and follow the instructions. For assistance with access to
eLibrary, the helpline can be reached at<PHONE_NUMBER>, TTY (202) 502-
8659, or at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The eLibrary link on the FERC
Web site also provides access to the texts of formal documents issued
by the Commission, such as orders, notices, and rule makings.

    Dated: May 5, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-09623 Filed 5-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 154 (Friday, August 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54632-54633]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17282]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2022-0037; OMB No. 1660-NW163]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review, Comment Request; Generic Clearance for Notice of Loss and Proof
of Loss

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: 30-Day notice of new collection and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will submit the
information collection abstracted below to the Office of Management and
Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The submission seeks comments
concerning the Generic Clearance for the Collection of the Notice of
Loss and Proof of Loss for claimants who file a claim with the Agency
seeking compensation for injury or loss of property resulting from
fires.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before September 11, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection

should be made to Director, Information Management Division, 500 C St
SW, Washington, DC 20472, email address: [email protected] or Angelica Searls, Emergency Management
Specialist, Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
202-701-9021, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to collect information from
parties who apply for compensation under FEMA-established fire claims
programs stemming from its role providing financial assistance and
direct services to individuals applying for disaster assistance
benefits in the event of a federally declared disaster as specified by
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act
(Stafford Act), Public Law 93-288, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5121-5207). On
September 30, 2022, President Biden signed into law the Hermit's Peak/
Calf Canyon Fire Assistance Act (``Act'') Public Law 117-180, Division
G--Hermit's Peak/Calf Canyon Fire Assistance Act. Congress passed the
Act to compensate those claimants who suffered injury and loss of
property from the Hermit's Peak/Calf Canyon Fire. A generic clearance
will help minimize delays in FEMA's ability to respond to future fire
incidents resulting in the establishment of claims offices.
    This proposed information collection previously published in the
Federal Register on May 5, 2023, at 88 FR 29144 with a 60-day public
comment period. No comments were received. The purpose of this notice
is to notify the public that FEMA will submit the information
collection abstracted below to the Office of Management and Budget for
review and clearance.

Collection of Information

    Title: Generic Clearance for Notice of Loss and Proof of Loss.
    Type of Information Collection: New information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-NW163.
    FEMA Forms: None.
    Abstract: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will use
the collected information to commence the process and procedures for
claimants to seek compensation for injury or loss of property resulting
from the Hermit's Peak/Calf Canyon Fire, and other fires that meet the
criteria. Affected State, local and Tribal governments, private sector
businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and individuals and
households that suffered injuries resulting from fires will be eligible
to apply for compensation. Claimants will submit a Notice of Loss to
the Agency, meet with a FEMA Claims Reviewer, obtain documentation
needed to substantiate claims, sign a Proof of Loss, and complete and
return a Release and Certification form.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households, State, local or Tribal
government, private sector businesses, and not-for-profit
organizations.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 287,250.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 287,250.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 732,489.
    Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost: $31,606,900.
    Estimated Respondents' Operation and Maintenance Costs: $0.
    Estimated Respondents' Capital and Start-Up Costs: $0.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost to the Federal Government: $65,103,002.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the Agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

Millicent L. Brown,
Records Management Branch Chief, Office of the Chief Administrative
Officer, Mission Support, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2023-17282 Filed 8-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-68-P


"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 01/16/2008 09:18 AM

To

Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Johansson, Robert" <EMAIL_ADDRESS>Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

RE: Follow up to today on O3 RIA; Mtg time on Thu

Ron thank you - you started my day with a smile.

Now for those finger strengthening exercises ..

:-)

heidi

-----Original Message-----

From<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:17 AM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Johansson, Robert;

<EMAIL_ADDRESS> Subject: RE: Follow up to today on O3 RIA; Mtg time on Thu

Heidi

Your fingers must be tired after all these e-mails.   Hopefully you have

a 3:00 meeting request on Thursday on your calendar to talk about

baseline.   We are shooting for Friday to talk about the extrapolated

cost with Art, time to be arranged (our first time did not work

internally).   I will arrange a slot for the Energy EO for sometime next

week, I have not caught up Lydia on this issue yet (I keep giving up my

1 on 1 slots to OMB meetings..............).  I have asked my staff to

pull together the emissions data you requested, it should be available

for the meeting on Thursday.

Ron

             "King, Heidi R."

             <Heidi_R._King@o

             mb.eop.gov>                                             To

                                      Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

             01/15/2008 06:07                                        cc

             PM                       Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA,

                                      "Johansson, Robert"

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>                                                                 Subject

                                      RE: Follow up to today on O3 RIA;

                                      Mtg time on Thu

I promise this is my last email of the day:

Ron, we agreed I believe to set up an interagency conversation on the

Energy Executive Order for Ozone NAAQS, and I wonder whether we can get

that scheduled for next week as well.  At the very least to have the

dialogue as a starting place.

Thanks, and good night,

heidi

From: King, Heidi R.

Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 6:00 PM

To<EMAIL_ADDRESS> Cc<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Johansson, Robert

Subject: RE: Follow up to today on O3 RIA; Mtg time on Thu

Also - who will be reaching out to set up time to brief Art on

extrapolated costs?  Or should I reach out to someone?

Thank you; I don't mean to push, but rather to avoid losing the

conversation thread while it is relatively fresh.

Best regards,

heidi

From: King, Heidi R.

Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 5:58 PM

To<EMAIL_ADDRESS> Cc<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Johansson, Robert

Subject: Follow up to today on O3 RIA; Mtg time on Thu

Ron and Lydia,

A couple of follow ups to today's conversation on Ozone NAAQS RIA:

- My apologies if I've missed an email, I believe we were going to set a

time for a Thu conversation to continue today's discussion on the

baseline issues.  Best time for OMB is something between 11am and 4pm;

let me know if we should rearrange schedules to accomodate an earlier

(or later) hour

- Could EPA please share the tons of NOx reduced (and % contribution)

between base case and baseline in the draft final RIA broken out by

1) Bond Rule

2) Progress toward current NAAQS

3) Locomotive and Marine Rule

4) Aircraft (for sake of completeness)

5) Mobile (Tier 3, after-market catalyst, plug-in hybrids) - this is

169,000 tons, I understand

- Furthermore, could we get further detail on what is assumed as

progress toward meeting the current NAAQS

Thank you;

heidi


[Federal Register: October 30, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 209)]
[Notices]
[Page 63366]
[DOCID:fr30oc06-136]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 27522; 812-13309]

Integrated ARROs Fund I, et al.; Notice of Application

October 23, 2006.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION: Notice of application for an order under section 38(a) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'').

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of the Application: Applicants request an order to rescind a
prior order dated April 21, 1987 (the ``Prior Order'').\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Integrated ARROs Fund I, et al., Investment Company Act Rel.
Nos. 15492 (Dec. 22, 1986) (notice) and 15693 (Apr. 21, 1987)
(order).

Applicants: Integrated ARROs Fund I, Integrated ARROs Fund II, and IR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pass-through Corporation (``IRPT'').

Filing Date:  The application was filed on June 23, 2006.

Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the application
will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested
persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's Secretary
and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by
mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30
p.m. on November 17, 2006, and should be accompanied by proof of
service on applicants in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a
certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the
writer's interest, the reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request
notification by writing to the Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicants: c/o Barbara Leary, Winthrop
Management LLC, 7 Bullfinch Place, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02114.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean E. Minarick, Senior Counsel, at
(202) 551-6811, or Mary Kay Frech, Branch Chief, at<PHONE_NUMBER>
(Office of Investment Company Regulation, Division of Investment
Management).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee at the
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549-0102 (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>).

Applicants' Representations and Legal Analysis

    1. The Funds were organized in 1987 as grantor trusts by IRPT, a
Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Integrated
Resources, Inc. The Funds were registered with the Commission as
closed-end investment companies. On October 17, 2005, the Funds made
final payment to all of their unitholders after the maturity, sale or
other disposition of all their securities assets. Pursuant to the terms
of the Funds' trust indentures, the Funds terminated automatically upon
the final payments. On November 18, 2005, each Fund filed an
application under section 8(f) of the Act for an order of
deregistration. On May 24, 2006, the Commission issued orders under
section 8(f) declaring that each Fund had ceased to be an investment
company.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Investment Company Act Rel. Nos. 27308 (Apr. 28, 2006)
(notice) and 27376 and 27377 (May 24, 2006) (orders).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. On April 21, 1987, the Commission issued the Prior Order under
sections 6(c), 17(b) and 17(d) of the Act exempting the Funds, IRPT and
certain future similarly organized closed-end investment companies
(``Future Funds'') from various provisions of the Act. The Applicants
state they have not organized, and do not intend to organize, any
Future Funds in reliance on the Prior Order.
    3. Applicants request an order under section 38(a) of the Act
rescinding the Prior Order. Section 38(a) of the Act states, in
relevant part, that the Commission shall have authority to rescind such
orders as are necessary or appropriate to the exercise of the powers
conferred upon the Commission elsewhere in the Act. Applicants submit
that the requested order is appropriate to the exercise of the
Commission's powers under the Act.

    By the Commission.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-18088 Filed 10-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P