1 SF 83 SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE NSPS Subpart Db, Industrial Commercial Institutional Steam Generating Units 1. Identification of the Information Collection 1( a) Title of the Information Collection ICR for NSPS Subpart Db, Industrial Commercial Institutional Steam Generating Units 1( b) Short Characterization/ Abstract This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Db. Sulfur dioxide ( SO 2), particulate matter ( PM), and nitrogen oxides ( NO x) are the pollutants regulated under this Subpart. The rule governing SO 2 emissions was promulgated on December 16, 1987 ( 52 FR 47842), and the rule governing PM and NO x was promulgated on November 25,

1986 ( 51 FR 42768). Revisions to the NO x standards were promulgated on December 18, 1989 ( 54 FR 51825). These standards apply to the following facilities: industrial

commercialinstitutional steam generating units that commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction after June 19, 1984, and that have a heat input capacity from fuels combusted in the unit of greater than 29 MW ( 100 million Btu/ hour).

Owners or operators of the affected facilities described must make one time only notifications, and are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. Monitoring requirements specific to these standards 2 provide information on compliance with the emission limits. Quarterly reports of excess emissions, or semiannual reports of no excess emissions, are required. All reports are sent to the delegated State or Local authority. In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are sent directly to the EPA Regional Office. A file of these reports and all other required records shall be retained for at least 2 years.

Approximately 870 sources are currently subject to the standard, and it is estimated that an additional 58 sources per year will become subject to the standard in the next three years. The cost of this ICR will be $ 13,777,791 per year.

2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2( a) Need/ Authority for the Collection The EPA is charged under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish standards of performance for new stationary sources that reflect:

. . . application of the best technological system of continuous emissions reduction which ( taking into consideration the cost of achieving such emissions reduction, or any nonair quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements) the Administrator determines has been adequately demonstrated [ Section 111( a)( l)].

The Agency refers to this charge as selecting the best demonstrated technology ( BDT).

Section 111 also requires that the Administrator review and, if appropriate, revise such standards every four years.

In addition, Section 114( a) States that:

. . . the Administrator may require any owner or operator subject to any requirement of this Act to ( A) establish and maintain such records, ( B) make such reports, ( C) install, use, and 3 maintain such monitoring equipment or methods ( in accordance with such methods at such locations, at such intervals, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe), and ( D)

sample such emissions, ( E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical, ( F) submit compliance certifications, and ( G) provide such other information as he may reasonably require.

In the Administrator's judgment, SO 2, PM, and NO x emissions from steam generating units cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, NSPS were promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR Part 60,

Subpart Db.

2( b) Practical Utility/ Users of the Data The control of emissions of SO 2, PM, and NO x from steam generating units requires not only the installation of properly designed equipment, but also the operation and maintenance of that equipment. These emissions from steam generating units are the result of operation of the boilers and the fuel they fire. The standards rely on the capture and/ or reduction of SO 2, PM, and NO x emissions by adsorption, absorption, condensation, combustion, or by the use of control technologies such as settling chambers, cyclones, wet collectors, electrostatic precipitators, and fabric filters.

The required notifications are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the standard. The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properly installed and operated, and the standard is being met. Performance test reports are needed as these are the Agency's record of a source's 4 initial capability to comply with the emission standard, and serve as a record of the operating conditions under which compliance was achieved. The quarterly/ semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. The information collected from recordkeeping and reporting requirements is also used for targeting inspections, and is of sufficient quality to be used as evidence in court.

3. Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria 3( a) Nonduplication The recordkeeping and reporting requested is required under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Db. If the standard has not been delegated, the information is sent to the appropriate EPA Regional Office. Otherwise, the information is sent directly to the delegated State or Local Agency. If a State or Local Agency has adopted their own similar regulation to implement the Federal Regulation, a copy of the report submitted to the State or Local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal Standard. Therefore, no duplication exists.

3( b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this ICR was published in the Federal Register on June 4, 1999.

3( c) Consultations No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register.

3( d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection 5 Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the required standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequently, the likelihood of detecting poor operation and maintenance of control equipment and noncompliance would decrease.

3( e) General Guidelines None of the reporting or recordkeeping requirements contained in 40 CFR Part 60,

Subpart Db, or otherwise pertinent to this request, violate any of the regulations established by OMB in 5 CFR 1320.6.

3( f) Confidentiality The required information consists of emissions data and other information that have been determined not to be private. However, any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 2, Subpart B  Confidentiality of Business Information ( see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251,

September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).

3( g) Sensitive Questions None of the reporting or recordkeeping requirements contained in 40 CFR Part 60,

Subpart Db, or otherwise pertinent to this request, contain sensitive questions.

4. The Respondents and the Information Requested 4( a) Respondents/ SIC Codes 6 The respondents of the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are facilities subject to NSPS Subpart Db ( SIC Code 5074) that commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction after June 19, 1984, and that have a heat input capacity from fuels combusted in the steam generating unit of greater than 29 MW ( 100 mmBtu/ hr).

4( b) Information Requested All data in this ICR that is recorded and/ or reported is required by 40 CFR Part 60,

Subpart Db.

Submit notifications of:

 construction/ reconstruction ( 60.7( a)( 1))

 anticipated startup ( 60.7( a)( 2))

 actual startup ( 60.7( a)( 3), 60.49b( a))

 physical or operational change ( 60.7( a)( 4))

 initial performance test ( 60.8( d))

 demonstration of continuous monitoring system ( 60.7( a)( 5))

Submit reports on:

 initial performance test results ( 60.8 ( a), 60.49b( b))

 excess emissions ( 60.49b( h))

 monitoring plans ( 60.49b( c))

 monitoring results ( 60.49b( i), ( j), ( k), ( l), ( m), ( n), ( q), ( r), ( s), ( t))

Maintain records of:

 startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, periods where the continuous monitoring system is inoperative ( 60.7( b)) 7  amounts of each fuel combusted ( 60.49b( d))

 nitrogen content of residual oil combusted ( 60.49b( e))

 opacity ( 60.49b( f))

 nitrogen oxide emission rates ( 60.49b( g), ( p))

Records are required to be retained for 2 years.

4( c) Respondent Activities  read instructions  install, calibrate, maintain, and operate CMS for opacity, or for pressure drop and liquid supply pressure for wet scrubber  perform initial and repeat performance tests  write the notifications and reports listed above  enter information required to be recorded above  submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information  develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information  develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of disclosing and providing information  adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements  train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; 8  transmit, or otherwise disclose the information 5. The Information Collected  Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management 5( a) Agency Activities EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analysis, storage,

and distribution of the information required under 40 CFR Subpart Db:

 Observes initial performance tests, and if necessary, repeat performance tests  Reviews notifications and reports, including performance test reports and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry  Audits facility records  Inputs, analyzes, and maintains data in the Aerometric Information Retrieval System ( AIRS) database 5( b) Collection Methodology and Management All reports are sent to the delegated State or local authority. In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are sent directly to the EPA Regional Office. Information contained in the reports is entered into AIRS which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. AIRS is EPA's database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance and annual emission inventory data for over 100,000 industrial and government owned facilities. EPA uses AIRS for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement by Local and State regulatory agencies, and EPA Regional Offices and Headquarters. EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data. 9 5( c) Small Entity Flexibility There are no small businesses affected by this standard.

5( d) Collection Schedule The specific frequency for each information collection activity within this request is shown on Table 2.

6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection Table 2 documents the computation of individual burdens for each of the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Where appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified.

Responses to this information collection are mandatory. The Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

For auxiliary boilers quarterly and annual CEMs audits are not required. Auxiliary boilers between 100MMBtu/ hr and 250 MMBtu/ hr that burns natural gas there is no monitoring burden.

For auxiliary boilers between 100MMBtu/ hr and 250 MMBtu/ hr that burns distillate oil, the source may use SO2 CEM, or use fuel sampling or even fuel certification to demonstrate compliance. For NOx, natural gas and distillate oil fired boilers are not required to use CEM for compliance.

6( a) Estimating Respondent Burden The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated at 575,033 person hours. These hours are based on 10 Agency studies and background documents from the development of the standards or test methods, Agency knowledge and experience with the NSPS program, the previously approved ICR, and any comments received.

6( b) Estimating Respondent Costs ( i) Estimating Labor Costs This ICR uses a labor rate of $ 23.96 per hour from the United States Department of Commerce Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 1998, Table 2 ( employment costs for civilian workers, by occupational and industry group). The rate is for the Technical occupational group,

and from column 1 (" Total compensation").

( ii) Estimating Capital and Operations and Maintenance Costs The type of industry costs associated with the information collection activity in the standards are labor and CEMs. The capital start up costs are one time costs when a facility becomes subject to the standard. The capital start up costs for this regulation are $ 11,600,000,

based on 58 new sources per year multiplied by $ 200,000 per CEM. The annual operations and maintenance ( O& M) costs are $ 14,355,000, based on an average of 957 existing sources ( over the 3 years) multiplied by $ 15,000 for upkeep of a monitoring device. The total respondent costs have been calculated as the sum of the capital start up costs and the annual O& M costs.

Therefore, the average total annual respondent burden for capital and O& M costs to industry over the next three years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 25,955,000.

( iii) Capital/ Start up vs. Operating and Maintenance ( O& M) Costs Monitoring device start up cost ($) annual O& M cost ($) SO 2, NO X 200,000 15,000 11 6( c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost The only Federal costs are user costs associated with analysis of the reported information.

Publication and distribution of the information are part of the AIRS program. Examination of records to be maintained by the respondents will occur as part of the periodic inspection of sources, which is part of EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program.

The average annual Federal Government cost during the 3 years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 47,354,681. This cost is based on the average wage of a GS10 step 1 employee, and travel associated with compliance activities. Details of the basis for this estimate are in Table 1.

6( d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs The number of existing sources subject to NSPS Subpart Db is 870, and the number of new sources subject is 58 per year. The total annual labor costs are $ 13,777,791, and total annual capital and O& M costs to the regulated entity are $ 25,955,000. Details upon which this estimate is based appear in Table 2.

6( e) Bottom Line Burden Hours And Cost Tables See Tables 1 and 2.

6( f) Reasons for Change in Burden The increase in burden from the most recently approved ICR is due to an increase in the number of new or modified sources, and to the addition of capital and O& M costs for the CEMs.

The capital and O& M costs are not new, but simply had not been previously reflected. The more accurate cost for CEM was obtained from the Office of Air Quality and Planning Standards. The figures are more accurate and up to date because the EPA received the cost information from the CEM manufacturers. 12 6( g) Burden Statement Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.

Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( 2822), 401 M St., S. W., Washington, D. C.

20460; and to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Include the EPA ICR number and OMB control number in any correspondence.

Part B of the Supporting Statement This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70720-70721]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29399]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14303-000]

KC LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application Accepted for
Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing
Applications

    On October 11, 2011, KC LLC filed an application for a preliminary
permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act (FPA),
proposing to study the feasibility of the Tinemaha Hydropower Project
(project) to be located at Tinemaha dam and reservoir on the Owens
River, three miles south of Big Pine in Inyo County, California. The
sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the permit
holder priority to file a license application during the permit term. A
preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder to perform any
land-disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands or waters
owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed project would consist of (1) the existing Los Angeles
Department of Water and Power Tinemaha reservoir earth fill dam; (2)
the existing Tinemaha reservoir with a surface area of 2,098 acres and
a storage capacity of 16,405 acre-feet at a normal surface elevation of
3,871 feet msl; (3) a 200-foot-long, 72-inch-diameter steel penstock;
(4) a

powerhouse with a 0.4 megawatt Kaplan generating unit, (5) a one-mile-
long, 25 kilovolt primary transmission line; and (6) appurtenant
facilities. The proposed project would have an estimated annual
production of 1.5 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Ms. Kelly W. Sackheim, Principal--KC LLC, 5096
Cocoa Palm Way, Fair Oaks, CA 95628; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Joseph Hassell; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-(866) 208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-14303-000) in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: November 8, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary
[FR Doc. 2011-29399 Filed 11-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 245 (Friday, December 20, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70221-70222]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27457]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-87761; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2019-41]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Order Approving
a Proposed Rule Change Regarding the Applicability and Functionality of
Certain Order Types on the Exchange

December 16, 2019.

I. Introduction

    On October 22, 2019, NYSE American LLC (``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend its rules
to clarify the applicability and functionality of certain order types
on the Exchange. The proposed rule change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on November 7, 2019.\3\ The Commission received no
comment letters on the proposed rule change. This order approves the
proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87442 (November 1,
2019), 84 FR 60125 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 900.3NY (Orders Defined) to
clarify the applicability and functionality of certain order types.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend the definitions of Stop
Orders, Stop Limit Orders and All-or None (``AON'') Orders, as set
forth in Rule 900.3NY(d), which describes Contingency Orders or Working
Orders. The Exchange states it is not proposing to change or alter any
obligations, rights, policies or practices. Rather, the Exchange states
that its proposal is designed to reduce potential investor confusion as
to the functionality and applicability of certain order types presently
available on the Exchange.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Notice, supra note 3, 84 FR at 60126.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Changes to Order Type Definitions

    Rule 900.3NY (the ``Rule'') contains certain definitions of options
order types available on the Exchange. Paragraph (d) of the Rule
defines Contingency Orders or Working Orders as orders that are
``contingent upon a condition being satisfied or an order with a
conditional or undisplayed price and/or size.'' The Exchange proposes
to add language regarding the handling of such orders to state that
Contingency Orders and Working Orders are maintained in the Working
Order File of the Consolidated Book until they are eligible for
execution and/or display.\5\ As discussed below, the Exchange also
proposes to amend the definitions of Stop Orders, Stop Limit Orders and
AON Orders, which are Contingency Orders/Working Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Rule 900.3NY(d). See Rule 964NY(b)(2)(E) (regarding
priority of orders in the Working Order File once eligible for
execution and stating that such orders ``do not have any priority or
standing until they are eligible for execution and/or display'') and
Rule 964NY(a) (providing, in relevant part, that the Exchange will
display ``all non-marketable limit orders in the Display Order
Process, unless indicated otherwise'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 900.3NY(d)(1)-(2): Stop Orders and Stop Limit Orders. A Stop
Order is an order that becomes a Market Order when the market for a
particular option contract reaches a specified price.\6\ A Stop Limit
Order is an order that becomes a Limit Order when the market for a
particular option contract reaches a specified price.\7\ Stop Orders
and Stop Limit Orders (collectively, ``Stop Orders'' herein unless
otherwise specified) track the price of an option and are generally
used to limit losses as prices move up, in the case of buy orders, or
down in the case of sell orders. In each case, the ``triggering
event,'' which converts the order type (to a Market Order or Limit
Order, as applicable) occurs once the option

trades or is quoted at, or above for a buy (below for a sell), the
specified stop price.\8\ Thus, Stop Orders to buy (sell) may be
triggered as the price of an option rises (falls). The current rule
provides that a Stop Order to buy (sell) will be rejected if, at the
time of arrival, the stop price is below (above) the bid (offer).\9\
The Exchange proposes to modify the description of Stop Orders as
follows. First, the Exchange proposes to revise the first sentence
describing each order type (i.e., Rule 900.3NY(d)(1), (2)) to state
that the order type converts to a Market or Limit Order, respectively--
or ``is triggered''--when the market for a particular option contract
reaches a specified price.\10\ The Exchange also proposes to modify
Rule 900.3NY(d)(1), (2) to combine into one sentence the description of
both buy and sell Stop Orders without modifying functionality. The
current rule addresses buy and sell Stop Orders in two sentences and
the Exchange believes the proposed change would make it easier to
navigate. Specifically, proposed Rule 900.3NY(d)(1), (2) would provide
that a Stop Order (or Stop Limit Order) ``to buy (sell) is triggered''
such that it becomes a Market Order or Limit Order, respectively,
``when the option contract trades at a price equal to or greater (less)
than the specified `stop' price on the Exchange or another Market
Center or when the Exchange bid (offer) is quoted at a price equal to
or greater (less) than the stop price.'' \11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Rule 900.3NY(d)(1).
    \7\ See Rule 900.3NY(d)(2).
    \8\ See Rule 900.3NY(d)(1), (2).
    \9\ Id.
    \10\ See proposed Rule 900.3NY(d)(1), (2).
    \11\ See proposed Rule 900.3NY(d)(1), (2). Consistent with this
proposed change to address both buy and sell Stop Orders and Stop
Limit Orders in one sentence, the Exchange proposes to delete as
unnecessary the sentences in the current definitions that describe
the functionality for sell Stop Orders and sell Stop Limit Orders.
See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to address the display and standing of
each type of Stop Order for which information is currently contained
only in paragraph (d)(1) of Rule 900.3NY.\12\ Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to modify its rules to reflect that each type of Stop
Order ``is not displayed and has no standing in any Order Process in
the Consolidated Book, unless or until it is triggered (i.e., same-side
incoming interest trades or quotes at a price equal to or better than
the stop price).'' \13\ The Exchange additionally proposes to add new
rule text to clarify that ``[a]fter the triggering event,'' a Stop
Order (per Rule 900.3NY(d)(1)) becomes a new Market Order, and a Stop
Limit Order (per Rule 900.3NY(d)(2)) becomes a new Limit Order, and
each converted order is processed accordingly.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Rule 900.3NY(d)(1) (which provides that ``Stop Orders
(including Stop Limit Orders) shall not have standing in any Order
Process in the Consolidated Book and shall not be displayed'').
    \13\ See proposed Rule 900.3NY(d)(1), (2). The Exchange notes
that this proposed text modifies the existing text in paragraph
(d)(1) and is new text for paragraph (d)(2) of the Rule. See id.
    \14\ See proposed Rule 900.3NY(d)(1), (2). See also Rule
900.3NY(a), (b) (defining Market Order and Limit Order,
respectively).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange proposes to delete the last two sentences in
the description of each type of Stop Order, which provides for the
rejection of such orders to buy (sell) if entered with a stop price
below the bid (or above the offer). The Exchange states that this
language is not accurate because the Exchange does not reject Stop
Orders so priced, but instead would execute such orders once
triggered.\15\ This proposed change would reflect current Exchange
functionality.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Notice, supra note 3, 84 FR at 60126.
    \16\ See proposed Rule 900.3NY(d)(1), (2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 900.3NY(d)(4): AON Orders. An AON Order is a Market or Limit
Order that is to be executed in its entirety or not at all.\17\ The
Exchange proposes to make clear that an AON Order that does not execute
on arrival will not be displayed or routed to another Market Center
(i.e., AON Orders may only be executed on the Exchange) and would have
no standing in any Order Process in the Consolidated Book.\18\ Further,
the Exchange proposes to clarify that AON Orders are not eligible to
execute against incoming interest but rather may execute solely against
interest resting in the Consolidated Book when sufficient size is
available.\19\ Finally, the Exchange proposes to specify that the
System monitors the Consolidated Book for AON Order execution
opportunities.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Rule 900.3NY(d)(4).
    \18\ See proposed Rule 900.3NY(d)(4). See also Rule
964NY(b)(2)(E) (regarding priority orders in the Working Order File
and noting that such orders (i.e., AON Orders) have no priority or
standing until eligible for execution and/or display).
    \19\ See proposed Rule 900.3NY(d)(4).
    \20\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion and Commission's Findings

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act \21\ and the
rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange.\22\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\23\ which
requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities
exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in
regulating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest,
and not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f).
    \22\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission notes that the Exchange represents it is not
proposing to change or alter any obligations, rights, policies or
practices. The Commission notes that the proposal would delete
inaccurate language regarding Stop Orders and clarify the descriptions
regarding the functionality of Contingency Orders, Working Orders, Stop
Orders, and AON Orders. In addition, the proposal would make
organizational and non-substantive changes to the rule text. The
Commission believes this should add transparency and clarity to the
Exchange's rules, without altering current functionality, to the
benefit of investors, market participants, and the public in general.
    For the reasons discussed above, the Commission believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the Act.

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\24\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEAMER-2019-41) be, and it
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-27457 Filed 12-19-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


 [Federal Register: October 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 204)] [ Proposed Rules]                [Page 54765-54766] [DOCID:fr23oc09-12]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0888; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-23]

RIN 2120-AA66

  Proposed Modification of Jet Route J-20; Florida

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify Jet Route J-20 by terminating

the route at the Orlando, FL, very high frequency omnidirectional

range/tactical air navigation (VORTAC) facility, thereby eliminating

the segment between the Orlando VORTAC and the Virginia Key, FL, very

high frequency omnidirectional range/distance measuring equipment (VOR/

DME) facility. This modification would eliminate a portion of J-20 that

is no longer needed.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 7, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of

Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001;

telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2009-

0888 and Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-23 at the beginning of your

comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace and Rules

Group, Office of System Operations Airspace and AIM, Federal Aviation

Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;

telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed

rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they

may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the

views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing

reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are

specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,

environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.

    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.

FAA-2009-0888 and Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-23) and be submitted in

triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for

address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments

on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,

stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments

to FAA Docket No. FAA-2009-0888 and Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-23.''

The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.

    All communications received on or before the specified closing date

for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed

rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of

comments received. All comments submitted will be available for

examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date

for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with

FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the

docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking

documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://

www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_

amendments/.

    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any

comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets

Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between 9

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. An

informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at

the office of the Eastern Service Center, Operations Support Group,

Federal Aviation Administration, Room 210, 1701 Columbia Ave., College

Park, GA 30337.

    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future

NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,

for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed

Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application

procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal

Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to eliminate the segment of J-20 that

extends between the Orlando VORTAC and the Virginia Key VOR/DME. The

FAA has determined that this portion of J-20 is no longer required.

Currently, J-20 parallels jet route J-53, between the Miami area and

DEARY intersection (southeast of the Orlando VORTAC). At DEARY, J-20

makes a left turn to the Orlando VORTAC where it converges with J-53.

This can cause a problem when aircraft are parallel on both J-20 and J-

53. Jet route J-113 provides a suitable northbound replacement route

for the J-20 segment. In addition, this change would provide air

traffic control with more time to get climbing aircraft to their

requested altitudes, thereby enhancing system efficiency.

    Jet routes are published in paragraph 2004 of FAA Order 7400.9T

dated August 27, 2009 and effective September 15, 2009, which is

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The jet route listed in this

document would be subsequently published in the Order.

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves

an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and

routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.

Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant

regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

``significant rule'' under Department of Transportation (DOT)

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);

and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the

anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that

will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is

certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a

significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is

found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106

describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,

Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's

authority.

    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in

Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the

FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the

airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient

use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority

as it modifies the route structure as required to preserve the safe and

efficient flow of air traffic.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in

accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies

and Procedures,'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation

Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,

24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order

7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 27,

2009 and effective September 15, 2009, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 2004 Jet Routes.

* * * * *

J-20 [Modified]

    From Seattle, WA, via Yakima, WA; Pendleton, OR; Donnelly, ID;

Pocatello, ID; Rock Springs, WY; Falcon, CO; Hugo, CO; Lamar, CO;

Liberal, KS; INT Liberal 137[deg] and Will Rogers, OK, 284[deg]

radials; Will Rogers; Belcher, LA; Jackson, MS; Montgomery, AL;

Meridian, MS; Seminole, FL; INT Seminole 129[deg] and Orlando, FL,

306[deg] radials; to Orlando.

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 15, 2009.

Edith V. Parish,

Manager, Airspace & Rules Group.

[FR Doc. E9-25490 Filed 10-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12363]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5019]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1956-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]

Oregon; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Oregon (FEMA-1956-DR), dated February 17,
2011, and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: February 17, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated February 17, 2011, the President issued a major disaster
declaration under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the
``Stafford Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State
of Oregon resulting from a severe winter storm, flooding, mudslides,
landslides, and debris flows during the period of January 13-21,
2011, is of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a major
disaster declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''). Therefore, I declare that such a major disaster exists in
the State of Oregon.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Public Assistance in the
designated areas and Hazard Mitigation throughout the State.
Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance is
supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation will be limited to 75
percent of the total eligible costs.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, Dolphin A. Diemont, of FEMA is
appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major
disaster.
    The following areas of the State of Oregon have been designated as
adversely affected by this major disaster:

Clackamas, Clatsop, Crook, Douglas, Lincoln, and Tillamook Counties
for Public Assistance.

All counties within the State of Oregon are eligible to apply for
assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-5019 Filed 3-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 240 (Friday, December 13, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68060-68063]
[FR Doc No: 2019-26643]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0974; Product Identifier 2019-NM-155-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2017-15-01, which applies to certain The Boeing Company Model 777
airplanes. AD 2017-15-01 requires replacing the existing mode control
panel (MCP) with a new MCP having a different part number. Since we
issued AD 2017-15-01, the FAA has determined that the affected parts
may be installed on airplanes outside of the original applicability of
AD 2017-15-01. This proposed AD would retain the requirements of AD
2017-15-01, expand the applicability to include those other airplanes,
and add a new requirement for certain airplanes to identify and replace
the affected parts. The FAA is proposing this AD to

address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 27,
2020.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS),
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also
available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0974.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0974; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Carreras, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2019-0974;
Product Identifier 2019-NM-155-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
The FAA specifically invites comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. The FAA will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
NPRM because of those comments.
    The FAA will post all comments received, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.
The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The FAA issued AD 2017-15-01, Amendment 39-18961 (82 FR 33782, July
21, 2017) (``AD 2017-15-01''), for certain The Boeing Company Model 777
airplanes. AD 2017-15-01 requires replacing the existing MCP with a new
MCP having a different part number. AD 2017-15-01 resulted from reports
of uncommanded altitude display changes in the MCP altitude window. The
FAA issued AD 2017-15-01 to address uncommanded changes to the MCP
selected altitude; such uncommanded changes could result in incorrect
spatial separation between airplanes, midair collision, or controlled
flight into terrain.

Actions Since AD 2017-15-01 Was Issued

    Since AD 2017-15-01 was issued, it has been determined that the
affected parts may be installed as rotable spares on airplanes outside
of the applicability of AD 2017-15-01, thereby subjecting those
airplanes to the unsafe condition. Therefore, the applicability in this
proposed AD has been expanded to include all The Boeing Company Model
777 airplanes. In addition, the FAA has determined that the
installation of later-approved parts is acceptable for the replacement
that would be required by this proposed AD.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    This proposed AD would require Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 777-22-0034, dated March 3, 2016, which the Director of the
Federal Register approved for incorporation by reference as of August
25, 2017 (82 FR 33782, July 21, 2017). This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    The FAA is proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would retain all of the requirements of AD 2017-
15-01, and would expand the applicability to include all The Boeing
Company Model 777 airplanes. This proposed AD would also require an
inspection or records check to identify the part number of the affected
parts, and for airplanes with affected parts, accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information described previously, except as
discussed under ``Differences Between this Proposed AD and the Service
Information.'' For information on the procedures, see this service
information at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0974.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information

    The effectivity of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-
22-0034, dated March 3, 2016, is limited to certain The Boeing Company
Model 777 airplanes. However, the applicability of this proposed AD
includes all The Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes. Because the
affected parts are rotable parts, the FAA has determined that these
parts could later be installed on airplanes that were initially
delivered with acceptable parts, thereby subjecting those airplanes to
the unsafe condition. This difference has been coordinated with Boeing.
    Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-22-0034, dated March
3, 2016, limits the replacement part to an MCP having part number
S241W001-262. This proposed AD would allow the installation of later-
approved parts for the replacement, provided those later-approved parts
meet certain conditions.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 231 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
             Action                   Labor cost          Parts cost       Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement (retained actions     2 work-hours x $85  Up to $5,800 *....  Up to $5,970 *....  Up to $1,379,070.*
 from AD 2017[dash]15[dash]01).    per hour = $170.
Inspection/records check (new     1 work-hour x $85   $0................  $85...............  Up to $2,380.
 proposed action) (up to 28        per hour = $85.
 airplanes).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Since the FAA has received no definitive data regarding the cost of a new MCP, the FAA has provided costs for
  the upgrade (modified part) only.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the
Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA has determined that this proposed AD would not have
federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD
would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2017-15-01, Amendment 39-18961 (82 FR 33782, July 21, 2017), and adding
the following new AD:

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2019-0974; Product Identifier
2019-NM-155-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by January 27,
2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2017-15-01, Amendment 39-18961 (82 FR 33782,
July 21, 2017) (``AD 2017-15-01'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 777-200, -200LR,
-300, -300ER, and 777F series airplanes, certificated in any
category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 22, Auto flight.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of uncommanded altitude display
changes in the mode control panel (MCP) altitude window. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address uncommanded changes to the MCP selected
altitude; such uncommanded changes could result in incorrect spatial
separation between airplanes, midair collision, or controlled flight
into terrain.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) New Definitions

    (1) For the purposes of this AD, an affected part is an MCP
having part number S241W001-201, S241W001-202, S241W001-251,
S241W001-252, or S241W001-261.
    (2) For the purposes of this AD, later-approved parts are only
those parts that are approved as a replacement for the applicable
part identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-22-
0034, dated March 3, 2016; and are approved as part of the type
design by the FAA or The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) after March 3, 2016 (the publication date of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-22-0034, dated March
3, 2016).

(h) Retained Replacement of MCP With Revised Compliance Language

    This paragraph restates the requirements of AD 2017-15-01, with
revised compliance language. For airplanes identified in Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-22-0034, dated March 3, 2016,
within 60 months after August 25, 2017, (the effective date of AD
2017-15-01): Do the actions specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (2) of
this AD.
    (1) Replace the existing MCP part with an MCP having part number
S241W001-262, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-22-0034, dated March
3, 2016.
    (2) Install a later-approved part as defined in paragraph (g)(2)
of this AD.

(i) New MCP Identification and Replacement

    For airplanes not identified in paragraph (h) of this AD with an
original airworthiness certificate or original export certificate of
airworthiness issued on or before the effective date of this AD, do
the actions specified in paragraphs (i)(1) and (2) of this AD.
    (1) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD,
perform a general visual inspection of the MCP to determine the MCP
part number. A review of airplane maintenance records is acceptable
in lieu of this inspection if the part number of the MCP can be
conclusively determined from that review.
    (2) If the MCP is an affected part, within 60 months after the
effective date of this AD:

Do the actions specified in paragraph (i)(2)(i) or (ii) of this AD.
    (i) Replace the existing MCP with an MCP having part number
S241W001-262, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-22-0034, dated March
3, 2016.
    (ii) Install a later-approved part as defined in paragraph
(g)(2) of this AD.

(j) Parts Installation Prohibition

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install an
MCP having part number S241W001-201, S241W001-202, S241W001-251,
S241W001-252, or S241W001-261, on any airplane.

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company ODA that has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To
be approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or
alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2017-15-01 are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this AD.
    (5) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs
(k)(5)(i) and (ii) of this AD apply.
    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.

(l) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Frank Carreras,
Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax:
206-231-3539; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on December 4, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-26643 Filed 12-12-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 218 (Thursday, November 12, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 69896-69897]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28562]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2015-4811; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-104-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700,
701, & 702) airplanes, Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705)
airplanes, Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, and
Model CL-600-2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes. This proposed
AD was prompted by the discovery of a number of incorrectly calibrated
angle of attack (AOA) transducers installed in the stall protection
system. This proposed AD would require replacement of affected AOA
transducers. We are proposing this AD to detect and replace incorrectly
calibrated AOA transducers; incorrect calibration of the transducers
could result in late activation of the stick pusher.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 28,
2015.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You
may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
4811; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-4811;
Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-104-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2015-18, effective July 16, 2015 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-
2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702) airplanes, Model CL-600-2D15
(Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet
Series 900) airplanes, and Model CL-600-2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000)
airplanes. The MCAI states:

    It was discovered that a number of [angle of attack] AOA
transducers installed on Bombardier CL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15, CL-
600-2D24, and CL-600-2E25 aeroplanes were incorrectly calibrated due
to a quality control problem at both the production and repair
facilities. Incorrect calibration of the AOA transducer could result
in a late activation of the stick pusher.
    This [Canadian] AD mandates the replacement of the incorrectly
calibrated AOA transducer.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
4811.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Bombardier, Inc. has issued Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-27-
069, dated March 30, 2015. The service information describes procedures
for replacement of the transducers with correctly calibrated AOA
transducers. This service information is reasonably available because
the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section of this
NPRM.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these
same type designs.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 400 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We also estimate that it would take about 4 work-hours per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about
$10,000 per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $4,136,000, or $10,340 per
product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2015-4811; Directorate Identifier
2015-NM-104-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by December 28, 2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the following Bombardier, Inc. airplanes,
certificated in any category.
    (1) Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702)
airplanes, serial numbers 10002 through 10999 inclusive.
    (2) Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes and
Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, serial
numbers 15001 through 15990 inclusive.
    (3) Model CL-600-2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes,
serial numbers 19001 through 19990 inclusive.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27, Flight
Controls.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by the discovery of a number of incorrectly
calibrated angle of attack (AOA) transducers installed in the stall
protection system. We are issuing this AD to detect and replace
incorrectly calibrated AOA transducers; incorrect calibration of the
transducers could result in late activation of the stick pusher.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Replacement

    Within 2,500 flight hours or 12 months, whichever occurs first
after the effective date of this AD, replace the AOA transducers
identified in paragraph 1.A., ``Effectivity,'' of Bombardier Service
Bulletin 670BA-27-069, dated March 30, 2015, with correctly
calibrated AOA transducers, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-27-069, dated
March 30, 2015.

(h) Parts Installation Prohibition

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install, on
any airplane, an AOA transducer having a part number or serial
number identified in paragraph 1.A., ``Effectivity,'' of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 670BA-27-069, dated March 30, 2015.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO,
ANE-170, Engine and Propeller Directorate, FAA; or Transport Canada
Civil Aviation (TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must
include the DAO-authorized signature.

(j) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2015-18, dated July 16,
2015, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-4811.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 30, 2015.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-28562 Filed 11-10-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8671-8672]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04055]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2017-0438; FRL-9974-30-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; Annual Public Water Systems Compliance
Report (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), Annual Public Water System
Compliance Report (EPA ICR No. 1812.06, OMB Control No. 2020-0020), to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a proposed
extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through April 30,
2018. Public comments were previously requested via the Federal
Register on September 29, 2017 during a 60-day comment period. This
notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller
description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden
and cost to the public. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a
person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless
it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before March 30,
2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2017-0438 to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by email to [email protected] or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email to
[email protected]. Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for
EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raquel Taveras, Monitoring, Assistance
and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, MC-2227A,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: Section 1414(c)(3)(A) of the Safe Drinking Water Act
(SDWA) requires that each state (a term that includes states,
commonwealths, tribes and territories) that has primary enforcement
authority under the SDWA shall prepare, make readily available to the
public, and submit to the Administrator of EPA, an annual report of
violations of national primary drinking water regulations in the state.
These Annual State Public Water System Compliance Reports are to
include violations of maximum contaminant levels, treatment
requirements, variances and exemptions, and monitoring requirements
determined to be significant by the Administrator after consultation
with the states. To minimize a state's burden in preparing its annual
statutorily-required report, EPA issued guidance that explains what
Section 1414(c)(3)(A) requires and provides model language and
reporting templates. EPA also annually makes available to the states a
computer query that generates for each state (from information states
are already separately required to submit to EPA's national database on
a quarterly basis) the required violations information in a table
consistent with the reporting template in EPA's guidance.
    Form numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: States that have primacy enforcement
authority and meet the definition of ``state'' under the SDWA.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory Section 1414
(c)(3)(A) of SDWA.
    Estimated number of respondents: 55 (total).
    Frequency of response: Annually.
    Total estimated burden: 4,400 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $470,000 (per year), includes $0 annualized
capital or operation & maintenance costs.

    Changes in estimates: There is no change of hours in the total
estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently approved by
OMB. This universe of respondents remains the same. The changes in
costs are due to inflation and an increase in wages for respondents,
rounded to 3 significant figures.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-04055 Filed 2-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: January 8, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 4)]
[Notices]
[Page 780-781]
[DOCID:fr08ja07-66]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Application for Partial Transfer of License Amendment
of License and Transmission Line License Soliciting Comments, Motions
To Intervene, and Protests

December 28, 2006.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Partial transfer of license by removing
project's transmission line and issuing for it a separate transmission
line license.
    b. Project No: 2816-037.
    c. Date Filed: November 6, 2006.
    d. Applicants: North Hartland LLC (North Hartland), and Central
Vermont Public Service Corp. (Central Vermont).
    e. Name of Project: North Hartland.
    f. Location: The project is located at the existing U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers' North Hartland Dam on the Ottauquechee River in Windsor
County, Vermont.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. Sec.  791a-825r.
    h. Applicants Contact: Richard A. Norman, North Hartland LLC, 55
Union Street, 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02018. Morris L. Silver Esq., The
Kellog Farm, P.O. Box 606, Benson, VT 05731, Tel:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Elizabeth W. Little, Nixon Peabody, LLP, 401 9th Street, Suite 900,
Washington, DC 20004,<PHONE_NUMBER>, and Gregory White, Central
Vermont Public Service Corp., 77 Grove Street, Rutland, VT 05701.
    i. FERC Contact: Any questions on this notice should be addressed
to Vedula Sarma at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments and/or motions: January 29, 2007.
    k. Description of Filing: North Harland proposes to transfer a
portion of its license containing approximately six miles of 12.5-kV
transmission line mounted on top of Central Vermont's utility system at
Pole 115 on Clay Hill Road to Central Vermont's Queechee
Substation. Central Vermont seeks a transmission line license for the
transmission line transferred to it from North Harland. North Hartland
seeks to amend its license to remove the transferred transmission line.
    l. Locations of Applications: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission in the
Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A,
Washington, DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may
also be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov

using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last
three digits in the docket number field to access the document. You may
also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp
 to be notified via e-mail of new filings and

issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
call toll-free 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item (h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene--Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents--Any filings must
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS'', ``PROTEST'', or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as
applicable, and the Project Number of the particular application to
which the filing refers. All documents (original and eight copies)
should be filed with: Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. A
copy of any motion to intervene must also be served upon each
representative of the Applicant specified in the particular
application.
    p. Agency Comments--Federal, state, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.
    q. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov

under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-22680 Filed 1-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 214 (Thursday, November 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68584-68585]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28149]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. IC-31887]

Notice of Applications for Deregistration Under Section 8(f) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940

October 30, 2015.
    The following is a notice of applications for deregistration under
section 8(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for the month of
October 2015. A copy of each application may be obtained via the
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. An order granting each
application will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested
persons may request a hearing on any application by writing to the
SEC's Secretary at the address below and serving the relevant applicant
with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on November 20, 2015, and
should be accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in the form of
an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to
Rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the nature of the
writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing
on the matter, the reason for the request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification
by writing to the Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES:  The Commission: Brent J. Fields, Secretary, U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Chief Counsel's Office at (202) 551-
6821, SEC, Division of Investment

Management, Chief Counsel's Office, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-8010.

Santander AM Funds Trust [File No. 811-22890]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. Applicant has never made a public offering of
its securities and does not propose to make a public offering or engage
in business of any kind.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on September 28, 2015.
    Applicant's Address: 2 Morrissey Boulevard, Dorchester,
Massachusetts 02125.

Eudora Funds [File No. 811-22729]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On September 10, 2015, applicant made a
liquidating distribution to its shareholders, based on net asset value.
Expenses of $7,750 incurred in connection with the liquidation were
paid by applicant's investment adviser.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on September 30, 2015.
    Applicant's Address: 8000 Town Centre Drive, Suite 400, Broadview
Heights, Ohio 44147.

Russell Exchange Traded Funds Trust [File No. 811-22320]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On January 30, 2015, applicant made a
liquidating distribution to its shareholders, based on net asset value.
Expenses of $41,223 incurred in connection with the liquidation were
paid by applicant's investment adviser.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on October 5, 2015.
    Applicant's Address: 1301 Second Avenue, 18th Floor, Seattle,
Washington 98101.

HCIM Trust [File No. 811-22871]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. Applicant transferred its assets to Hatteras
Disciplined Opportunity Fund, a series of Hatteras Alternative Mutual
Funds Trust, and on July 10, 2015, made a final distribution to its
shareholders based on net asset value. Expenses of $16,987.50 incurred
in connection with the reorganization were paid by the investment
adviser of the applicant and the acquiring fund.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on October 6, 2015.
    Applicant's Address: 6601 Six Forks Road, Suite 340, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27615.

Franklin Mutual Recovery Fund [File No. 811-21306]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. Applicant
transferred its assets to Franklin Mutual Quest Fund of the Franklin
Mutual Series Funds, and on August 27, 2015, made a final distribution
to its shareholders based on net asset value. Expenses of approximately
$116,653 incurred in connection with the reorganization were paid by
the acquiring fund and the investment adviser of the applicant and the
acquiring fund.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on October 23, 2015.
    Applicant's Address: 101 John F. Kennedy Parkway, Short Hills, New
Jersey 07078-2702

Master Basic Value LLC [File No. 811-10179]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On February 9, 2015, applicant made a
liquidating distribution to its shareholders, based on net asset value.
Expenses of approximately $135,046 incurred in connection with the
liquidation were paid by applicant's investment adviser.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on October 28, 2015.
    Applicant's Address: 100 Bellevue Parkway, Wilmington, Delaware
19809

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-28149 Filed 11-4-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P