[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 167 (Monday, August 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59223-59224]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20617]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0118; FRL-9949-96-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; Control of Evaporative Emissions From New
and In-Use Portable Gasoline Containers (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), ``Control of

Evaporative Emissions from New and In-Use Portable Gasoline Containers
(Renewal),'' (EPA ICR No. 2213.05, OMB Control No. 2060-0597) to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved
through August 31, 2016. Public comments were previously requested via
the Federal Register (81 FR 23293) on April 20, 2016 during a 60-day
comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public
comments. A fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its
estimated burden and cost to the public. An Agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before September 28,
2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OAR-2013-0118, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for
EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia Giuliano, Compliance Division,
Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 2000 Traverwood, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105; telephone number:
734-214-4865; fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: EPA is required under section 183(e) of the Clean Air Act
to regulate Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emissions from the use of
consumer and commercial products. Under regulations promulgated on
February 26, 2007 (72 FR 8428) manufacturers of new portable gasoline
containers are required to obtain certificates of conformity with the
Clean Air Act, effective January 1, 2009. This ICR covers the burdens
associated with this certification process. EPA reviews information
submitted in the application for certification to determine if the
container design conforms to applicable requirements and to verify that
the required testing has been performed. The certificate holder is
required to keep records on the testing and collect and keep warranty
and defect information for annual reporting on in-use performance of
their products. The respondent must also retain records on the units
produced, apply serial numbers to individual containers, and track the
serial numbers to their certificates of conformity. Any information
submitted for which a claim of confidentiality is made is safeguarded
according to EPA regulations at 40 CFR 2.201 et seq.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Manufacturers of new portable
gasoline containers from 0.25 to 10.0 gallons in capacity.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory 40 CFR part 59,
subpart F.
    Estimated number of respondents: 8 (total).
    Frequency of response: Yearly for warranty reports; at least once
every five years for certificate renewals.
    Total estimated burden: 250 hours (per year). Burden is defined at
5 CFR 1320.3(b)
    Total estimated cost: $32,419.45 (per year), includes $20,452
annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is an increase of 71 hours in the total
estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently approved by
OMB. This increase of the estimated burden and cost estimates is due to
a change in the estimated cost of labor and additional testing
requirements for new portable fuel container families to comply with
the requirements for evaporative testing promulgated in 40 CFR part 59.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-20617 Filed 8-26-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 62 (Tuesday, April 1, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18410-18412]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07233]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard; Ford Motor Company

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document grants in full Ford Motor Company's (Ford)
petition for an exemption of the Fiesta vehicle

line in accordance with 49 CFR Part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard. This petition is granted because the agency has
determined that the antitheft device to be placed on the line as
standard equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the 49 CFR Part 541, Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard (Theft Prevention Standard). Ford also requested
confidential treatment of specific information in its petition. The
agency will address Ford's request for confidential treatment by
separate letter.

DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
the 2015 model year (MY).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building, Room W43-439, Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard's telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Her fax number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated December 10, 2013, Ford
requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard for the Fiesta vehicle line beginning with MY 2015.
The petition requested exemption from parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR
Part 543, Exemption From Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard, based on
the installation of an antitheft device as standard equipment for the
entire vehicle line.
    Under 49 CFR Part 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to
grant exemptions for one vehicle line per model year. In its petition,
Ford provided a detailed description and diagram of the identity,
design, and location of the components of the antitheft device for the
Fiesta vehicle line. Ford stated that the Model Year (MY) 2015 Fiesta
will be installed with a passive, electronic immobilizer device using
encrypted transponder technology as standard equipment on the entire
vehicle line. Ford also stated that depending on the trim level of the
vehicle, the device would be equipped with either the SecuriLock
Passive Anti-Theft Electronic Engine Immobilizer system (SecuriLock/
PATS) or the Intelligent Access with Push Button Start (IAwPB) system
on its Fiesta vehicle line. Specifically, Ford stated that the
SecuriLock/PATS system will be installed as standard equipment on all
Fiesta trim levels except the Titanium package that would instead be
equipped with the IAwPB system as standard equipment. Along with Ford's
passive immobilizer, key components of the SecuriLock/PATS antitheft
system will include an electronic transponder key, powertrain control
module (PCM), transceiver module ignition lock and cluster. Key
components of the IAwPB system will include an electronic key fob,
remote function actuator (RFA), Keyless Vehicle Module (KVM),
powertrain control module and Ford's passive immobilizer. Ford further
stated that its Titanium package will also be offered with a separate
perimeter alarm system as standard equipment. The perimeter alarm
system activates a visible and audible alarm if unauthorized access is
attempted. Ford's submission is considered a complete petition as
required by 49 CFR 543.7, in that it meets the general requirements
contained in Sec.  543.5 and the specific content requirements of Sec.
543.6.
    Ford stated that when the ignition key is turned to the ``Run/
Start'' position on the SecuriLock/PATS system or the ``Start/Stop''
button is pressed on the IAwPB system, the transceiver module reads the
ignition key code and transmits an encrypted message from the keycode
to the control module. Once the key is validated, starting of the
engine is authorized by sending a separate encrypted message to the
powertrain control module (PCM). Ford stated that the powertrain will
function only if the keycode matches the unique identification keycode
previously programmed into the cluster of the SecuriLock/PATS-equipped
vehicles or the RFA in the IAwPB-equipped vehicles. In both systems, if
the codes do not match, the vehicle will be inoperable. Ford stated
that in both systems, an electronic key will be programmed into the
vehicle during system initialization performed at the manufacturing
plant. With the IAwPB system, Ford stated that if the programmed key is
not present in the vehicle, the engine will not start. Additionally,
Ford further stated that the powertrain will function only if the
keycode matches the unique identification keycode previously programmed
into the Cluster/RFA. Ford also pointed out that in addition to the
programmed key, there are three modules that must be matched together
in order to start the vehicle, adding an additional level of security
to both systems. Specifically, Ford stated that both the SecuriLock/
PATS and IAwPB systems' Cluster/RFA and PCM respectively share security
data that during vehicle assembly form matched modules that if
separated from each other will not function in other vehicles.
    In addressing the specific content requirements of 543.6, Ford
provided information on the reliability and durability of its proposed
device. To ensure reliability and durability of the device, Ford
conducted tests based on its own specified standards. Ford provided a
detailed list of the tests conducted and believes that the device is
reliable and durable since the device complied with its own specified
requirements for each test.
    Ford stated that its MY 2015 Fiesta vehicle line will also be
equipped with several other standard antitheft features common to Ford
vehicles, (i.e., hood release located inside the vehicle, counterfeit
resistant VIN labels, secondary VINs and secured cabin accessibility).
Ford also stated that incorporation of several other features in both
systems further support reliability and durability of the device.
Specifically, some of those features include: Encrypted communication
between the transponder and the control function (Cluster/RFA module)
and the PCM; numerous code combinations making key duplication
virtually impossible; inability to mechanically override the device to
start the vehicle; and any attempt to slam-pull the ignition lock
cylinder or short the ``Start/Stop'' button will have no effect on an
intruder's ability to start the vehicle without the correct code being
transmitted to the electronic control modules.
    Ford compared the device proposed for its vehicle line with other
devices which NHTSA has determined to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as would compliance with the parts-
marking requirements. Ford stated that it believes that the standard
installation of either the SecuriLock/PATS system or the IAwPB system
would be an effective deterrent against vehicle theft.
    Ford stated that the SecuriLock/PATS system was introduced as
standard equipment on all of its MY 1996 Ford Mustang GT, Cobra and
other selected models. Ford also stated that in MY 1997, the
SecuriLock/PATS system was extended to the complete Ford Mustang
vehicle line as standard equipment. Ford further stated that according
to the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB) theft statistics, there
was a 70% reduction in the theft rate for the MY 1997 Ford Mustang
vehicle line installed with its SecuriLock/PATS system as compared to
the theft rate for its MY 1995 Ford Mustang vehicle line not installed
with the system.

    Ford also reported that beginning with MY 2010, the SecuriLock
system was installed as standard equipment on all of its North American
Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicles but was offered as optional
equipment on its 2010 F-series Super Duty pickups, Econoline and
Transit Connect vehicles. Ford further stated that beginning with MY
2010, the IAwPB system was installed as standard equipment on the
Lincoln MKT vehicles and offered as standard equipment on the Lincoln
MKX and optionally on the Lincoln MKS, Taurus, Edge, Explorer and the
Focus vehicles beginning with MY 2011. Starting with 2013, the IAwPB
has been offered as standard equipment on the Lincoln MKZ and as
optional equipment on the Ford Fusion, C-Max and Escape vehicles.
    Ford stated that both antitheft systems with a standard equipment
immobilizer are of the same design and performance as that of the MY
2006 Ford Focus vehicle line. Ford was granted an exemption for the
Focus vehicle line on February 14, 2006 by NHTSA (See 71 FR 7824)
beginning with its MY 2006 vehicles. Since the agency granted Ford's
exemption for its MY 2006 Focus vehicle line, Ford referenced theft
rate data published by NHTSA showing that theft rates for the Focus
vehicle line have been gradually decreasing and is currently very close
to the theft rate for all vehicles published for MY's 2000-2010. Ford
stated that since the SecuriLock or the IAwPB systems (with a standard
equipment immobilizer device) will be the primary theft deterrents on
Ford Fiesta vehicles, it believes that the very low theft rates are
likely to continue or improve in the future. The current theft rate for
the MY 2011 Ford Focus is 1.3840 and the average theft rate using three
MYs' data (2009-2011) is 1.5179.
    The agency agrees that the device is substantially similar to
devices installed on other vehicle lines for which the agency has
already granted exemptions.
    Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of Part
541 either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that Ford has provided adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft device for the Ford Fiesta vehicle line is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard
(49 CFR Part 541). This conclusion is based on the information Ford
provided about its device.
    Based on the supporting evidence submitted by Ford on the device,
the agency believes that the antitheft device for the Fiesta vehicle
line is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor
vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541). The agency concludes that
the device will provide four of the five types of performance listed in
Sec.  543.6(a)(3): Promoting activation; preventing defeat or
circumvention of the device by unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
    For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full Ford's
petition for exemption for the Fiesta vehicle line from the parts-
marking requirements of 49 CFR Part 541. The agency notes that 49 CFR
Part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies those lines that are exempted from
the Theft Prevention Standard for a given model year. 49 CFR Part
543.7(f) contains publication requirements incident to the disposition
of all Part 543 petitions. Advanced listing, including the release of
future product nameplates, the beginning model year for which the
petition is granted and a general description of the antitheft device
is necessary in order to notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle
lines exempted from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard.
    If Ford decides not to use the exemption for this line, it must
formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line must
be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR Parts 541.5
and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
    NHTSA notes that if Ford wishes in the future to modify the device
on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit a
petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a Part 543
exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted under
this part and equipped with the antitheft device on which the line's
exemption is based. Further, Part 543.9(c)(2) provides for the
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in
that exemption.''
    The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself.
The agency did not intend in drafting Part 543 to require the
submission of a modification petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many
such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any changes, the effects of which
might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a petition to modify.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR
1.50.

Lori K. Summers,
Director, Office of Crashworthiness Standards.
[FR Doc. 2014-07233 Filed 3-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


DuPont Chemical Solutions Enterprise

Chambers Works

Deepwater, NJ  08023

May 19, 2009

Document Control Office

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

Room 6428

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Re: 	EPA – HQ – OPPT – 2003 - 0012

	DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100

	PFOA Data Submittal – Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples

	February 2009 Sample Data

Dear Document Control Office:

As per Part IV, Section G.5.a of the NJPDES permit, we are submitting a summary of PFOA analytical results for the weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A to NJDEP on a monthly basis. Per your request, we are sending you a paper and electronic copy of the report for samples taken during February 2009. We will continue to send you the reports each month.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (856) 540-3015.

Sincerely,

Karen L. Pinder

SHE Consultant – Environmental

DuPont Chambers Works

Enclosures

Copies to:

Director, Chemical Control Division

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

Room 4146

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20004

Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only)

Principal Environmental Engineer

NJDEP Division of Water Quality

Bureau of Point Source Permitting – Region 2

401 E. State Street

P.O. Box 029

Trenton, NJ 08625-0029


[Federal Register: October 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 204)]
[Notices]
[Page 65317-65319]
[DOCID:fr22oc10-63]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

October 14, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-67-000.
    Applicants: Stephentown Regulation Services LLC.
    Description: Stephentown Regulation Services LLC submits tariff
filing per 35.12: Stephentown FERC Electric, Volume No. 1 Baseline
Filing to be effective 10/8/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101008-5139.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-68-000.
    Applicants: Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.
    Description: Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. submits tariff
filing per 35.12: Transmission Assignment Tariff to be effective 10/11/
2010.
    Filed Date: 10/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101008-5150.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-69-000.
    Applicants: Columbus Southern Power Company.
    Description: Columbus Southern Power Company submits concurrences

to the baseline Open Access Transmission Service Tariff pursuant to
Order No 714, to be effective 9/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5007.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-70-000.
    Applicants: Indiana Michigan Power Company.
    Description: Indiana Michigan Power Company submits concurrences to
the baseline Open Access Transmission Service Tariff pursuant to Order
No 714, to be effective 9/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5009.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-71-000.
    Applicants: Kentucky Power Company.
    Description: Kentucky Power Company submits tariff filing per
35.12: 20101011 OATT Concurrence--KPCo to be effective 9/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5010.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-72-000.
    Applicants: Kingsport Power Company.
    Description: Kingsport Power Company submits tariff filing per
35.12: 20101011 OATT Concurrence--KgPCo to be effective 9/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5011.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-73-000.
    Applicants: Ohio Power Company.
    Description: Ohio Power Company submits tariff filing per 35.12:
20101011 OATT Concurrence--OPCo to be effective 9/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5012.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-74-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of Oklahoma.
    Description: Public Service Company of Oklahoma submits tariff
filing per 35.12: 20101011 OATT Concurrence--PSO to be effective 9/1/
2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5013.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-75-000.
    Applicants: Southwestern Electric Power Company.
    Description: Southwestern Electric Power Company submits tariff
filing per 35.12: 20101011 OATT Concurrence--SWEPCO to be effective 9/
1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5014.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-76-000.
    Applicants: Wheeling Power Company.
    Description: Wheeling Power Company submits tariff filing per
35.12: 20101011 OATT Concurrence--WPCo to be effective 9/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5015.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-77-000.
    Applicants: AEP Texas Central Company.
    Description: AEP Texas Central Company submits tariff filing per
35.12: 20101011 OATT Concurrence--TCC to be effective 9/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5016.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-78-000.
    Applicants: AEP Texas North Company.
    Description: AEP Texas North Company submits tariff filing per
35.12: 20101011 OATT Concurrence--AEP TNC to be effective 9/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5017.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-80-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): ISO-NE QPCRD Revisions to be effective 1/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5112.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-82-000.
    Applicants: RRI Energy Services, Inc.
    Description: RRI Energy Services, Inc. submits their Compliance
Filing, to be effective 9/27/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5169.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-83-000.
    Applicants: Carolina Power & Light Company.
    Description: Carolina Power & Light Company submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Rate Schedule No. 173 of Carolina Power and Light Co. to be
effective 12/11/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5172.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-84-000.
    Applicants: Carolina Power & Light Company.
    Description: Carolina Power & Light Company submits tariff filing
per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Rate Schedule No. 189 of Carolina Power and Light
Co. to be effective 12/11/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5173.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-85-000.
    Applicants: Societe Generale Energie (USA) Corp.
    Description: Societe Generale Energie (USA) Corp. submits tariff
filing per 35.12: SGE USA Baseline Tariff Filing to be effective 10/12/
2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5178.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-86-000.
    Applicants: RRI Energy Florida, LLC.
    Description: RRI Energy Florida, LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Compliance Filing to be effective 9/27/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5180.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-87-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits tariff Compliance
Filing, to be effective 9/17/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5202.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-88-000.
    Applicants: Flat Rock Windpower LLC.
    Description: Flat Rock Windpower LLC submits tariff filing per
35.15: Cancellation of Duplicate Baseline Tariff to be effective 10/12/
2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5203.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-89-000.
    Applicants: Flat Rock Windpower II LLC.
    Description: Flat Rock Windpower II LLC submits tariff filing per
35.15: Cancellation of Duplicate Baseline Tariff to be effective 10/12/
2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5209.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-90-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): ISA No. 2644, T41--PJM, PSEG Fossil and PSEG Company
to be effective 9/17/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5213.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-92-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: New York Independent System Operator, Inc. submits
tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 205 filing--Tarff Amendment &
Request for Expedited Consideration & Waiver to be effective 10/21/
2010.
    Filed Date: 10/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101012-5355.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    As it relates to any qualifying facility filings, the notices of
self-certification [or self-recertification] listed above, do not
institute a proceeding regarding qualifying facility status. A notice
of self-certification [or self-recertification] simply provides
notification that the entity making the filing has determined the
facility named in the notice meets the applicable criteria to be a
qualifying facility. Intervention and/or protest do not lie in dockets
that are qualifying facility self-certifications or self-
recertifications. Any person seeking to challenge such qualifying
facility status may do so by filing a motion pursuant to 18 CFR
292.207(d)(iii). Intervention and protests may be filed in response to
notices of qualifying facility dockets other than self-certifications
and self-recertifications.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26755 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5434]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01798]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP16-302-000]

Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC; Notice of Initiation of Section
5 Proceeding

    On January 21, 2016, the Commission issued an order in Docket No.
RP16-302-000, pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C.
717d (2012), instituting an investigation into the justness and
reasonableness of Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC's (Columbia Gulf)
currently effective tariff rates. The Commission's order directs
Columbia Gulf to file a full cost and revenue study within 75 days of
the issuance of the order. Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC, 154 FERC ]
61,027 (2016).

    Dated: January 21, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-01798 Filed 2-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P