[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 56 (Thursday, March 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16893-16894]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6852]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2012-0024; Notice 1]

Supreme Indiana Operations, Inc., Receipt of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Receipt of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Startrans, a division of Supreme Indiana Operations, Inc.,
(Startrans) \1\ has determined that certain Startrans trucks, buses,
and multifunction school activity buses (MFSAB) manufactured from 2006
through 2011, do not fully comply with paragraph S5.3 of Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 120, Tire selection and rims and
motor home/recreation vehicle trailer load carrying capacity
information for motor vehicles with a GVWR of more than 4,536 kilograms
(10,000 pounds). Startrans has filed an appropriate report dated
November 16, 2011, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Supreme Indiana Operations, Inc., is manufacturer of motor
vehicles and is registered under the laws of the state of Delaware.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see implementing rule
at 49 CFR part 556), Startrans submitted a petition for an exemption
from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301
on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor
vehicle safety.
    This notice of receipt of Startrans' petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
    Vehicles involved: Affected are approximately: 97,271 Startrans
2006 through 2011 model year trucks, 9,543 Startrans 2007 through 2011
model year buses, and 436 model year 2007 through 2011 MFSAB.
    NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, these provisions
only apply to the subject vehicles that Startrans no longer controlled
at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
    Noncompliance: Startrans explains that the noncompliance is that
the height of the lettering on the combined certification and tire
information labels attached to the subject vehicles is less than that
required by paragraph S5.3 of FMVSS No. 120. The lettering on the
noncompliant labels is only 2.12 millimeters (mm) in height. The height
required by paragraph S5.3 is 2.4 mm.
    Rule text: Paragraph S5.3 of FMVSS No. 120 requires in pertinent
part:

    S5.3 Each vehicle shall show the information specified in S5.3.1
and S5.3.2 and, in the case of a vehicle equipped with a non-
pneumatic spare tire, the information specified in S5.3.3, in the
English language, lettered in block capitals and numerals not less
than 2.4 millimeters high and in the format set forth following this
paragraph. This information shall appear either--
    (a) After each GAWR listed on the certification label required
by Sec.  567.4 or Sec.  567.5 of this chapter; or at the option of
the manufacturer,
    (b) On the tire information label affixed to the vehicle in the
manner, location, and form described in Sec.  567.4(b) through (f)
of this chapter as appropriate of each GVWR-GAWR combination listed
on the certification label.

Summary of Startrans' Analysis and Arguments

    Startrans determined that the subject noncompliance existed after
being notified by the NHTSA's Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance
(OVSC) that an apparent noncompliance was identified during an OVSC
FMVSS No. 120 compliance test of a model year 2010 Startrans MFSAB.
    Startrans makes the argument that the subject noncompliance is not
performance related and is inconsequential to vehicle safety. The font
height of the text on the certification label is just 0.28 mm less than
the requirement, but the label text is clear, legible and meets all the
other labeling requirements.
    Startrans also states that the number of vehicles that potentially
require remedy is 107,250 and represents several concerns. These
vehicles are already registered and currently represent no concern with
licensing. To perform a remedy on this many vehicles invites the
possibility of certification decals being reinstalled on the wrong
vehicles.
    Startrans has additionally informed NHTSA that it has corrected the
noncompliance so that all future production vehicles will comply with
FMVSS No. 120.
    In summation, Startrans believes that the described noncompliance
of its vehicles is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that
its petition, to exempt from providing recall notification of
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted.
    Comments: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited at the beginning of this notice and be
submitted by any of the following methods:
    a. By mail addressed to: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
    b. By hand delivery to: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Section is open on
weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
    c. Electronically: by logging onto the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) Web site at http://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the
online instructions for submitting comments. Comments may also be faxed
to 1-202-493-2251.
    Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that your comments were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
    Documents submitted to a docket may be viewed by anyone at the
address and times given above. The documents may

also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
following the online instructions for accessing the dockets. DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
    The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received
before the close of business on the closing date indicated below will
be filed and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the extent possible. When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.

DATES: Comment Closing Date: April 23, 2012.

    Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
CFR 1.50 and 501.8)

    Issued on: March 16, 2012.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2012-6852 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register: June 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 104)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 30295]
[DOCID:fr01jn10-13]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-1063; Airspace Docket No. 09-ANM-22]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Hoquiam, WA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action will amend existing Class E airspace at Hoquiam,
WA. Controlled Class E surface airspace will be continuous at Bowerman
Airport, Hoquiam, WA. The FAA is taking this action to enhance the
safety and management of aircraft operations at the airport. This
action also will correct the airport name.

DATES: Effective date, 0901 UTC, July 29, 2010. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On December 18, 2009, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to amend controlled airspace at Hoquiam,
WA (74 FR 67140). Interested parties were invited to participate in
this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal
to the FAA. No comments were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6002 of
FAA Order 7400.9T signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15,
2009, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The Class
E airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in that Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by changing the time of operation of Class E surface area
airspace to continuous at Bowerman Airport, thereby removing the
specific dates and times as stated in advance by a Notice to Airmen.
This action also corrects the airport name from Bowerman Field to
Bowerman Airport. This action is necessary for the safety and
management of IFR operations.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The FAA's authority to
issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the U.S.
Code. Subtitle 1, section 106 discusses the authority of the FAA
Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency's authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, part A,
subpart I, section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to
ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority as it amends
controlled airspace at Bowerman Airport, Hoquiam, WA.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15,
2009 is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6002. Class E airspace Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

ANM WA E2 Hoquiam, WA [Amended]

Bowerman Airport, WA
    (Lat. 46[deg]58'16'' N., long. 123[deg]56'12'' W.)

    Within a 4-mile radius of Bowerman Airport, and within 3.5 miles
each side of the Bowerman Airport 081[deg] bearing extending from
the 4-mile radius to 8.4 miles east of Bowerman Airport, and within
1.4 miles each side of the Bowerman Airport 261[deg] bearing
extending from the 4-mile radius to 8.8 miles west of Bowerman
Airport.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on May 14, 2010.
Clark Desing,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2010-12881 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: June 26, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 124)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 36269-36270]
[DOCID:fr26jn08-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0154; Airspace Docket No. 08-ASO-10]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Canon, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class E Airspace at Canon, GA, to
accommodate the new Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning System
(GPS) Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) that have been
developed for Franklin County Airport. Controlled airspace extending
upward from 700 feet Above Ground Level (AGL) is needed to contain the
SIAP and for Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations at Franklin County
Airport. The operating status of the airport will change from Visual
Flight Rules (VFR) to include IFR operations concurrent with the
publication of the SIAP.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, September 25, 2008. The Director of
the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action
under title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the
annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming
amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melinda Giddens, System Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box
20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On March 21, 2008, the FAA proposed to amend Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by establishing Class E airspace
at Canon, GA, (73 FR 14949). This action provides

adequate Class E airspace for IFR operations at Franklin County
Airport. Designations for Class E airspace areas extending upward from
700 feet or more above the surface of the earth are published in FAA
Order 74009R, dated August 15. 2007, and effective September 15, 2007,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The Class E
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.
    Interested persons were invited to participate in this rulemaking
proceeding by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA.
No comments objecting to the proposal were received.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 establishes Class E airspace at Canon, GA, to provide
controlled airspace required to support the Area Navigation (RNAV)
Global Positioning System (GPS) Standard Instrument Approach Procedures
(SlAPs) that have been developed for Franklin County Airport.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

Adoption of the Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9R, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, signed August 15, 2007, effective September 15, 2007, is
amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward from 700
feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASO GA E5 Canon, GA [New]

Franklin County Airport, GA
    (Lat. 34[deg]20'25'' N., long. 83[deg]07'51'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
of the Earth within a 6.6-mile radius of the Franklin County
Airport.
* * * * *

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on June 5, 2008.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. E8-14168 Filed 6-25-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 112 (Tuesday, June 11, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27055-27057]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12217]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 70

[EPA-R07-OAR-2019-0300; FRL-9994-80-Region 7]

Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Revision to Emission Data, Emission
Fees and Process Information Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing
approval of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Operating Permits
Program revision submitted by the State of Missouri on January 15,
2019. The revisions add definitions, removes language referring to
outdated emission fees, and updates incorporations by reference in the
rule. The revision is administrative in nature and does not have an
adverse effect on air quality. The EPA's proposed approval of this rule
revision is being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean
Air Act (CAA).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 11, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2019-0300 to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Written
Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Meyer, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201
Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913) 551-
7140; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision and
Operating Permits Program been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Written Comments

    Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2019-
0300, at https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

II. What is being addressed in this document?

    The EPA is proposing to approve a revision to Missouri's SIP by
approving the state's request to revise 10 CSR 10-6.110, Reporting
Emission Data, Emission Fees, and Process Information, received January
15, 2019. Missouri revised 10 CSR 10-6.110 to correct minor
typographical errors. In addition, section (2) of this rule is revised
to include definitions for:
     Missouri Emissions Inventory System (MoEIS)--the online
interface of the state of Missouri's air emissions inventory database.
     Point source--a large, stationary (nonmobile),
identifiable source of emissions that releases pollutants into the
atmosphere, that is either a major source under 40 CFR part 70 for the
pollutants for which reporting is required; or a holder of an
intermediate operating permit.
     Reporting year--Twelve (12) month calendar year ending
December 31. The reporting requirement for installations with three
(3)-year reporting cycles begins with the 2011 reporting year. The
subsequent reporting years will be every three (3) years following 2011
(i.e., 2014, 2017, 2020, etc.).
     Small source--An installation subject to this rule but not
a point

source as defined in this section of the rule.
    The addition of the above definitions to 10 CSR 10-6.110 provides
additional context to requirements of the rule that were not previously
defined but do no impact the applicability of the requirements of the
rule.
    Section (3)(A)1. revised the emission fees section, which is
approved under the Operating Permits Program only, and removes language
that applied to emissions fees prior to January 1, 2016. No changes
were made to the emission fees in the rule.
    Section (3)(B) is revised to update incorporation by reference of
AP-42 (Environmental Protection Agency Compilation of Air Pollution
Emission Factors) as published by the EPA in August 2018 and FIRE
(Factor Information Retrieval System) as published by EPA August 2017.
    Section (3)(C)4.B. was revised to update incorporation by reference
of 40 CFR 52.21 as promulgated by EPA as of July 1, 2018.
    Section (4)(C)2. was revised to clarify that an installation that
does not submit a full emissions report is required to submit a reduced
reporting form. The revised language does not alter the requirements of
the rule.
    Section (4)(C)7. was removed from the rule and no longer requires
revised Emissions Inventory Questionnaires to be presented to the
regulated community for a forty-five-day comment period.
    The above revisions to 10 CSR 10-6.110 are administrative in
nature, update incorporation by reference, or provide additional
context to regulatory language without altering applicability of the
rule and does not impact air quality. Therefore, the EPA proposes to
approve the above revisions to 10 CSR 10-6.110.

III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision and Operating
Permits Program been met?

    The state submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
state provided public notice on this SIP revision from June 25, 2018,
to August 2, 2018, and received comments from the EPA and a regulated
entity. The state adequately addressed the public comments. In
addition, the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of the
CAA, including section 110 and implementing regulations.

IV. What action is the EPA taking?

    We are proposing to approve the revisions to Missouri's SIP and
Missouri's Operating Permits Program by approving the state's request
to revise 10 CSR 10-6.110, Reporting Emission Data, Emission Fees, and
Process Information.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, the EPA is proposing to include regulatory text
in an EPA final rule that includes incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the Missouri Regulations described in the
proposed amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 7 Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

40 CFR Part 70

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Operating permits,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: June 6, 2019.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR parts 52 and 70 as set forth below:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart AA--Missouri

0
2. In Sec.  52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry ``10-6.110'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1320   Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                        EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         State
     Missouri citation               Title          effective date    EPA approval date         Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
    Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control
                                      Regulations for the State of Missouri
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
10-6.110...................  Reporting Emission          1/30/2019  [Date of publication   Section (3)(A),
                              Data, Emission Fees,                   of the final rule in   Emissions Fees, has
                              and Process                            the Federal            not been approved as
                              Information.                           Register], [Federal    part of the SIP.
                                                                     Register citation of
                                                                     the final rule].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

PART 70--STATE OPERATING PERMIT PROGRAMS

0
3. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

Appendix A to Part 70--Approval Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs

0
4. Appendix A to part 70 is amended by adding new paragraph (hh) under
``Missouri'' to read as follows: Missouri
* * * * *
    (hh) The Missouri Department of Natural Resources submitted
revisions to Missouri rule 10 CSR 10-6.110, ``Reporting Emission
Data, Emission Fees, and Process Information'' on January 15, 2019.
The state effective date is January 30, 2019. Approval of Section
3(A) of 10 CSR 10-6.110 is effective [date 30 days after date of
publication of the final rule in the Federal Register].
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-12217 Filed 6-10-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 89 (Monday, May 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27696-27697]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09849]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 34577; File No. 812-15280]

AFC BDC Inc., et al;

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'').

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice of application for an order (``Order'') under sections 17(d)
and 57(i) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') and rule
17d-1 under the Act to permit certain joint transactions otherwise
prohibited by sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the Act and rule 17d-1
under the Act.
    Summary of Application: Applicants request an order to permit
certain business development companies (``BDCs'') and closed-end
management investment companies to co-invest in portfolio companies
with each other and with certain affiliated investment entities.
    Applicants: AFC BDC Inc., AFC Advisor LLC, AFC Management, LLC, AFC
Investments, LLC, and AFC Gamma, Inc.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on November 8, 2021, and
amended on November 17, 2021 and April 29, 2022.
    Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing on any application by emailing
the SEC's Secretary at [email protected] and serving

the Applicants with a copy of the request by email, if an email address
is listed for the relevant Applicant below, or personally or by mail,
if a physical address is listed for the relevant Applicant below.
Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on
May 31, 2022, and should be accompanied by proof of service on
applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate
of service. Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should
state the nature of the writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the
desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason for the request,
and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing
may request notification by emailing the Commission's Secretary at
[email protected].

ADDRESSES: The Commission: [email protected]. Applicants:
Bernard Berman, [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jill Ehrlich, Senior Counsel, or Lisa
Reid Ragen, Branch Chief, at<PHONE_NUMBER> (Division of Investment
Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For Applicants' representations, legal
analysis, and conditions, please refer to Applicants' second amended
and restated application, dated April 29, 2022, which may be obtained
via the Commission's website by searching for the file number at the
top of this document, or for an Applicant using the Company name search
field, on the SEC's EDGAR system. The SEC's EDGAR system may be
searched at http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/legacy/companysearch.html. You may also call the SEC's Public Reference Room
at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.

    Dated: May 3, 2022.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-09849 Filed 5-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: August 21, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 163)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 49368-49371]
[DOCID:fr21au08-17]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0899; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-022-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Honeywell Flight Management Systems
(FMSs) Equipped with Honeywell NZ-2000 Navigation Computers and
Honeywell IC-800 or IC-800E Integrated Avionics Computers; as Installed
on Various Transport Category Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) that applies to all Honeywell FMSs served by Honeywell
NZ-2000 navigation computers and IC-800 integrated avionics computers.
The existing AD currently requires identifying affected computers by
part number and software modification level and revising the
Limitations section of applicable airplane flight manuals to provide
procedures for retaining optimum position determination and intended
navigation. This proposed AD would require uploading new software,
which would terminate the existing requirements. This proposed AD
results from reports of in-flight unannunciated shifts of computed
position in airplanes with the subject FMS computers. We are proposing
this AD to prevent a shift in the FMS computed position, which could
result in uncommanded deviations from the intended flight path of the
airplane and, if those deviations are undetected by the flight crew,
compromised terrain/traffic avoidance.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 6, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Honeywell,
P.O. Box 21111, Phoenix, AZ 85036-1111.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. Kirk Baker, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712-4137; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0899;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-022-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On March 23, 2007, we issued AD 2007-07-12, amendment 39-15009 (72
FR 15818, April 3, 2007), for all Honeywell flight management systems
(FMSs) served by Honeywell NZ-2000 navigation computers and IC-800
integrated avionics computers. That AD requires identifying affected
computers by part number and software modification level and revising
the Limitations section of applicable airplane flight manuals (AFM) to
provide procedures for retaining optimum position determination and
intended navigation. That AD resulted from reports of in-flight
unannunciated shifts of computed position in airplanes with the subject
FMS computers. We issued that AD to prevent a shift in the FMS computed
position, which could result in uncommanded deviations from the
intended flight path of the airplane and, if those deviations are
undetected by the flight crew, compromised terrain/traffic avoidance.

Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued

    The preamble to AD 2007-07-12 specified that we considered the
requirements ``interim action'' and that the manufacturer was
developing a modification to address the unsafe condition. That AD
explained that we might consider further rulemaking if a modification
is developed, approved, and available. The manufacturer now has
developed such a modification, and we have determined that further
rulemaking is indeed necessary; this proposed AD follows from that
determination.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed Honeywell Alert Service Bulletin 7017300-22-A6112,
dated June 22, 2007. This service bulletin describes procedures for
uploading new software in a certain IC-800 or IC-800E integrated
avionic computer (IAC), as applicable. We also have reviewed Honeywell
Alert Service Bulletins 7018879-34-A6060, Revision 001, dated January
21, 2008; 7018879-34-6061, Revision 001, dated January 21, 2008;
7018879-34-A6062, dated June 12, 2007; and 7018879-34-A6063, dated July
6, 2007. These service bulletins describe procedures for uploading new
software in certain NZ-2000 navigation computers (NAV computer).
Accomplishing the actions specified in the service information is
intended to adequately address the unsafe condition.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to develop on other products of the
same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD, which
would supersede AD 2007-07-12 and would retain the requirements of the
existing AD. This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions
specified in service bulletins described previously, which would
constitute terminating action for the retained requirements.

Differences Between Proposed Rule and Service Bulletins

    Although the service bulletins recommend installing the new
software ``as manpower and material are available,'' we have determined
that this imprecise compliance time would not address the identified
unsafe condition in a timely manner. In developing an appropriate
compliance time for this AD, we considered not only the manufacturer's
recommendation, but the degree of urgency associated with addressing
the subject unsafe condition, the average utilization of the affected
fleet, and the time necessary to upload the new software. In light of
all of these factors, we find a compliance time of 12 months for
completing the proposed actions to be warranted, in that it represents
an appropriate interval of time for affected airplanes to continue to
operate without compromising safety.

Change to Existing AD

    We find that Honeywell Model IC-800E IAC was not specifically
identified by model name in the applicability of AD 2007-07-12.
However, that IAC was identified by manufacturer's part number 7017300-
56023 in the effectivity listing of Honeywell Technical Newsletter A23-
6111-008, Revision 001, dated February 22, 2007, which was referenced
in AD 2007-07-12 as the appropriate source of service information for
accomplishing the required actions. Therefore, we have revised the
applicability of this proposed AD to specifically reference Model IC-
800E IAC in addition to Model IC-800 IAC, where appropriate.

Costs of Compliance

    There are about 104 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The following table provides the estimated costs for
U.S. operators to comply with this proposed AD.

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of U.S.-
             Action                  Work hour     Average labor     Cost per       registered      Fleet cost
                                                   rate per hour     airplane        airplanes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFM revision (required by AD                   1             $80             $80              77          $6,160
 2007-07-12)....................
Terminating action (new proposed               1              80              80              77           6,160
 action)........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec.  39.13 by
removing amendment 39-15009 (72 FR 15818, April 3, 2007) and adding the
following new airworthiness directive (AD):

Honeywell, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2008-0899; Directorate Identifier
2008-NM-022-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by October
6, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2007-07-12.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all Honeywell NZ-2000 navigation
computers and Honeywell IC-800 or IC-800E integrated avionics
computers; as installed on transport category airplanes,
certificated in any category, including but not limited to the
airplanes identified in Table 1 of this AD.

                    Table 1--Known Affected Airplanes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Manufacturer                            Model
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bombardier, Inc..............  CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL-601-3R, and CL-
                                604) airplanes.
Dassault Aviation............  Mystere-Falcon 900 airplanes.
Gulfstream Aerospace           G-1159A and GV airplanes, and G-IV series
 Corporation.                   airplanes.
Lockheed.....................  382G series airplanes.
Hawker Beechcraft (formerly    BAe.125 Series 800A (including C-29A and
 Raytheon Aircraft Company).    U-125) airplanes.
                               Hawker 800XP and 1000 airplanes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from in-flight unannunciated shifts of
computed position in airplanes with the subject flight management
system (FMS) computers identified in paragraph (c) of this AD. We
are issuing this AD to prevent a shift in the FMS computed position,
which could result in uncommanded deviations from the intended
flight path of the airplane and, if those deviations are undetected
by the flight crew, compromised terrain/traffic avoidance.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Requirements of AD 2007-07-12

Identification of Part Number/Modification Level

    (f) Within 14 days after April 18, 2007 (the effective date of
AD 2007-07-12): Determine if the installed NZ-2000 navigation
computers and IC-800 or IC-800E integrated avionics computers
serving FMSs have computer part numbers and software modification
levels identified in Honeywell Technical Newsletter A23-6111-008,
Revision 001, dated February 22, 2007. For purposes of this AD,
airplanes with FMS computers having a part number and software
modification level identified in the newsletter are ``affected
airplanes.''

Revision of Airplane Flight Manual (AFM)

    (g) For any affected airplane: Within 14 days after April 18,
2007, revise the Limitations section of the applicable AFM to
incorporate the information included in Appendix A of Honeywell
Technical

Newsletter A23-6111-008, Revision 001, dated February 22, 2007. This
may be done by inserting a copy of Appendix A of the newsletter into
the AFM.

New Requirements of This AD

Terminating Action

    (h) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, upload
applicable software as specified in Table 2 of this AD. After
uploading the applicable software, the requirements of paragraphs
(f) and (g) of this AD are no longer necessary, and the AFM revision
required by paragraph (g) of this AD may be removed.

                       Table 2--Terminating Action
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               In accordance with
  Upload new software in--     the Accomplishment           For--
                                Instructions of--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The IC-800 or IC-800E     Honeywell Alert       The IAC identified
 integrated avionic computer   Service Bulletin      in the service
 (IAC), as applicable.         7017300-22-A6112,     bulletin.
                               dated June 22, 2007.
(2) The NZ-2000 navigation    Honeywell Alert       The NAV computer
 computer (NAV computer).      Service Bulletin      identified in the
                               7018879-34-A6060,     service bulletin.
                               Revision 001, dated
                               January 21, 2008.
                              Honeywell Service     The NAV computer
                               Bulletin 7018879-34-  identified in the
                               6061, Revision 001,   service bulletin.
                               dated January 21,
                               2008.
                              Honeywell Alert       The NAV computer
                               Service Bulletin      identified in the
                               7018879-34-A6062,     service bulletin.
                               dated June 12, 2007.
                              Honeywell Alert       The NAV computer
                               Service Bulletin      identified in the
                               7018879-34-A6063,     service bulletin.
                               dated July 6, 2007.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (i)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA, ATTN: J. Kirk Baker, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment
Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137; telephone
(562) 627-5345; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 6, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-19361 Filed 8-20-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24160-24161]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9704]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0213; FRL-9661-7]

Revisions to the Hawaii State Implementation Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Hawaii State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions would update and replace the
minor new source review rules that EPA approved into the Hawaii SIP in
1983.

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by May 23, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2012-0213, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Gerardo Rios (Air-3), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or email. www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous
access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send email directly to EPA, your email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov, some
information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location
(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be publicly
available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours
with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Geoffrey Glass, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3534<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local
rules: Hawaii State Department of Health Rules 11-60.1-3, 11-60.1-5,
11-60.1-7, 11-60.1-12, 11-60.1-19, 11-60.1-81, 11-60.1-82, 11-60.1-83,
11-60.1-84, 11-60.1-91, 11-60.1-92, 11-60.1-93, 11-60.1-99, 11-60.1-
103, and 11-60.1-104. In the Rules and Regulations section of this
Federal Register, we are approving these local rules in a direct final
action without prior proposal because we believe these SIP revisions
are not controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will
publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the
comments in subsequent action based on this proposed rule. Please note
that if we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or
section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the
rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
    We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further
information, please see the direct final action.

    Dated: March 20, 2012.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2012-9704 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P