[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 158 (Thursday, August 17, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39019-39020]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17387]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2017-0273]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,
Palm Beach, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulation with request for
comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the operation of the Flagler Memorial
(SR A1A), Royal Park (SR 704), and the Southern Boulevard (SR 700/80)
bridges, across the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AICW), miles
1020.8, 1022.6 and 1024.7 at Palm Beach, Florida. This deviation will
test for 180 days a change to the drawbridge operation schedules to
determine whether a permanent change to the schedules is needed. This
deviation is necessary to reduce traffic congestion and ensure the
safety of the roadways, while meeting the needs of waterways users,
whenever the President of the United States, members of the First
Family, or other persons under the protection of the Secret Service are
present or expected to be

visiting Mar-a-Lago. This deviation allows the Flagler Memorial and
Royal Park bridges to open once an hour during a 4 hour period on
weekdays when the President is staying at Mar-a-Lago, and the Southern
Boulevard Bridge to remain closed to navigation when the presidential
motorcade is in transit.

DATES: This deviation is effective from September 1, 2017, until
February 27, 2018.
    Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before October 16, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-0273 using Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary deviation, call or email Mr. Eddie Lawrence with the Seventh
Coast Guard District Bridge Office; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis

    When the President of the United States, members of the First
Family, or other persons under the protection of the Secret Service are
present or expected to be present at Mar-a-Lago, traffic backups have
been caused by drawbridge openings in the Palm Beach area. The increase
in traffic occurs due to the closure of Southern Boulevard when the
President is visiting Mar-a-Lago. This requires through traffic to use
the Flagler Memorial and Royal Park Bridges to cross the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway (AICW). Due to the increased traffic using the
Flagler Memorial and Royal Park bridges when the President is in town,
the Mayor of Palm Beach has asked the Coast Guard and the bridge owner,
Florida Department of Transportation, to test a change to the operating
regulations of those bridges.
    During this temporary deviation, the Flagler Memorial and Royal
Park Bridges will only be required to open once an hour, on the quarter
and half hour, respectively, starting at 2:15 p.m. through 5:30 p.m.
during the weekdays only. The Flagler memorial Bridge will open at 2:15
p.m., 3:15 p.m., 4:15 p.m. and 5:15 p.m., weekdays, if vessels are
requesting an opening. The Royal Park (Middle) Bridge will open at 2:30
p.m., 3:30 p.m., 4:30 p.m. and 5:30 p.m., weekdays, if vessels are
requesting an opening.
    The operating schedule of the Southern Boulevard Bridge, which is
closest to Mar-a-Lago and also crosses the AICW, will not be affected
during the aforementioned times. However it will be allowed to remain
closed whenever the presidential motorcade is in transit. At all other
times all three bridges will operate per their normal schedules. The
current operating regulation is under 33 CFR 117.261 at paragraphs (u),
(v), and (w), respectively.
    This general deviation will have an impact on marine traffic while
alleviating some vehicle traffic backups. Tugs with tows are not exempt
from this regulation.
    The Coast Guard will inform waterway users of the schedule changes
through our Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners, so that vessel
operators can arrange their transits to minimize any impact caused by
the temporary deviation. Mariners should also listen to local news
organizations to determine when the President, members of the First
Family, or other persons under the protection of the Secret Service are
visiting Mar-a-Largo.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the effective
period of this temporary deviation. This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. The Coast Guard will
continue to evaluate the impact to mariners navigating this area during
the closure periods and is requesting comments be submitted during the
first 60 days of this deviation.
    Vessels able to pass through the bridge in the closed position may
do so at anytime. The bridge will be able to open for emergencies.

II. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086). Documents mentioned in this notice, and all
public comments, are in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that Web site's instructions.
Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up for email
alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a final rule
is published.

Barry Dragon,
Director, Bridge Branch, Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2017-17387 Filed 8-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


species stage year impinged. est entrained. est notes comments junk junk  99  99  99 junk junk alosa. herring larvae 1978 0 615,200 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. gizzard. shad larvae 1978 0 329,500 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. clupeidae. herring larvae 1978 0 3,742,900 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. mooneye. goldeye larvae 1978 0 285,300 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. common. carp larvae 1978 0 130,089,600 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. silver. chub larvae 1978 0 513,400 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. emerald. shiner larvae 1978 0 9,329,400 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. shiner. spp larvae 1978 0 266,200 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. minnow. spp larvae 1978 0 59,223,900 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. quillback larvae 1978 0 63,400 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. carpiodes. sucker larvae 1978 0 85,664,400 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. white. sucker larvae 1978 0 3,904,600 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. redhorse. spp larvae 1978 0 202,800 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. catostomidae. sucker larvae 1978 0 121,664,800 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. channel. catfish larvae 1978 0 342,400 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. catfish larvae 1978 0 44,300 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. catfish. family larvae 1978 0 95,100 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. white. bass larvae 1978 0 114,100 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. temperate. bass. spp larvae 1978 0 95,100 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. lepomis. sunfish larvae 1978 0 272,600 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. crappie. spp larvae 1978 0 1,520,400 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. centrarchidae. sunfish larvae 1978 0 1,172,600 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. darter. spp larvae 1978 0 44,400 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. yellow. perch larvae 1978 0 51,500 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. walleye larvae 1978 0 44,400 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. sauger. walleye larvae 1978 0 15,614,600 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. percid. spp larvae 1978 0 1,147,900 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. freshwater. drum larvae 1978 0 45,288,800 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. unidentified larvae 1978 0 102,338,400 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. unidentified egg 1978 0 5,324,500 # 21954, table 4, page 33 March August, 1978. longnose. gar age01 1978 54 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu skipjack. herring age01 1978 117 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. gizzard. shad age01 1978 133404 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. herring. spp age01 1978 39 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu mooneye age01 1978 218 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. northern. pike age01 1978 39 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu common. carp age01 1978 125 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. silver. chub age01 1978 498 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. golden. shiner age01 1978 195 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. emerald. shiner age01 1978 10895 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. mimic. shiner age01 1978 280 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. bluntnose. minnow age01 1978 16 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu creek. chub age01 1978 8 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu minnow. spp age01 1978 358 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. river. carpsucker age01 1978 8 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu quillback age01 1978 218 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. white. sucker age01 1978 8 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu spotted. sucker age01 1978 16 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu silver. redhorse age01 1978 8 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu golden. redhorse age01 1978 140 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. shorthead. redhorse age01 1978 8 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu redhorse. spp age01 1978 8 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu sucker. spp age01 1978 16 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu brown. bullhead age01 1978 54 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu channel. catfish age01 1978 4771 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. flathead. catfish age01 1978 451 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. white. bass age01 1978 786 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. rock. bass age01 1978 16 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu green. sunfish age01 1978 8 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu pumpkinseed age01 1978 16 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu warmouth age01 1978 241 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. bluegill age01 1978 2047 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. longear. sunfish age01 1978 140 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. lepomis. sunfish age01 1978 23 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu smallmouth. bass age01 1978 23 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu largemouth. bass age01 1978 47 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu micropterus. sunfish age01 1978 8 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 white. crappie age01 1978 1448 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. black. crappie age01 1978 553 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. crappie. spp age01 1978 62 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu centrarchidae. sunfish age01 1978 23 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu yellow. perch age01 1978 140 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. logperch age01 1978 109 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. sauger age01 1978 2451 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. walleye age01 1978 8 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. Valu freshwater. drum age01 1978 26125 0 # 21954, table 1, page 16 April 1978 April 1979. Based on annual est. total of 186,223. alue < 93.

alue < 93.

alue < 93.

alue < 93. alue < 93.

alue < 93.

alue < 93. alue < 93. alue < 93.

alue < 93. alue < 93. alue < 93. alue < 93.

alue < 93. alue < 93. alue < 93.

alue < 93. alue < 93. alue < 93.

alue < 93. alue < 93.

alue < 93. Worksheet Description losses01 Reported impingement & entrainment losses at Kyger Creek Additional Notes losses01 Assumed age01 for all species for impingement.

Data QC for tables in this file done by Michelle Barron, August 2001 and AGRET Sept., 2001 Impingement and entrainment losses data for Kyger Creek Power Plant Workbook compiled for use in fish impingement/ entainment loss model. Amy Beaulieu, 6/ 13/ 01; Agret 09/ 03/ 01


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68957]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27319]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

39th Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 206, Aeronautical
Information and Meteorological Data Link Services

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 206, Aeronautical
Information and Meteorological Data Link Services.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the
thirty-ninth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 206, Aeronautical
Information and Meteorological Data Link Services.

DATES: The meeting will be held December 8-12, 2014, 10:00 a.m.-5:00
p.m. on Monday (EST), 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Tuesday to Thursday and 8:30
a.m.-11:00 a.m. on Friday.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1150 18th St. NW., Suite
910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0652/(202) 833-9339, fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 206. The agenda will
include the following:

December 8th Monday 10:00 a.m.

 Opening Plenary
 Opening remarks and Attendees' introductions
 Review and approval of meeting agenda
 Approval of previous meeting minutes (Norman, OK)
 TOR changes
 Industry presentations
    [cir] Systems Wide Information Management Program Status
    [cir] Weather Technology in the Cockpit (WTIC) Concept of
Operations

December 9th--10th Tuesday and Wednesday 8:30 a.m.

 Sub-Group meetings (Plenary if FIS-B MOPS has large number of
comments and needs more time to resolve)

December 10th Wednesday 1:00 p.m.

 FAA AAtS Workshop

December 11th Thursday

 Plenary: FIS-B MOPS FRAC Review (start date if small number of
comments)
 Sub-Group meetings (Plenary FIS-B MOPS FRAC Review, if needed)

December 12th Friday

Closing Plenary
 Sub-Groups' reports and Action item review
 Future meeting plans and dates
 Other business
 Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 11, 2014.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Program Oversight and Administration,
Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-27319 Filed 11-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 196)]
[Notices]
[Page 62515-62516]
[DOCID:fr12oc10-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP10-510-000]

El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Application

October 4, 2010.
    Take notice that on September 28, 2010, El Paso Natural Gas Company
(EPNG), P.O. Box 1087, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80944, filed in the
above referenced docket an application pursuant to section 7(b) of the
Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Part 157 of the Commission's regulations,
requesting the abandonment in place of EPNG's Deming Compressor Station
located in Luna County, New Mexico and Tucson Compressor Station
located in Gila County, Arizona, all as more fully set forth in the
application which is on file with the Commission and open to public
inspection. The filing is available for review at the Commission in the
Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at
http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY,
(202) 502-8659.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to Susan
C. Stires, Director, Regulatory Affairs, El Paso Natural Gas Company,
P.O. Box 1087, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80944 at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by
fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.

    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 14 copies of filings made in the proceeding with the Commission
and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other party. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentors will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: October 25, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25513 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 16, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 49)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11037-11040]
[DOCID:fr16mr09-14]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0884; FRL-8771-1]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Hawaii;
Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is correcting errors in certain
final rules approving or compiling the Hawaii state implementation
plan. These errors relate to the title of the plan, removal of variance
provisions, and compilations of federally-enforceable regulations. The
intended effect is to ensure that the Hawaii state implementation plan
is correctly identified in the applicable part of the Code of Federal
Regulations.

DATES: This rule is effective on May 15, 2009 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by April 15, 2009. If we receive
such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take
effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2008-088F, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions.
    2<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Ginger Vagenas (AIR-2), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.

    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov portal is
an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If
EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material), and some may not be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ginger Vagenas, Plannning Office (AIR-
2), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. Error Correction
III. Public Comment and Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    Under the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act''), each state is required to
have a state implementation plan (SIP) which contains the control
measures and strategies which will be used to attain and maintain the
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). The SIP is extensive,
containing such elements as emission inventories, monitoring networks,
attainment demonstrations, and enforcement mechanisms. The control
measures and strategies must be formally adopted by each state after
the public has had an opportunity to comment on them. They are then
submitted to EPA as SIP revisions on which EPA must formally act.
    The SIP is a living document which can be revised by the state as
necessary to address the unique air pollution problems in the state.
Therefore, EPA from time to time must take action on SIP revisions
which may contain new and/or revised regulations as being part of the
SIP. On May 31, 1972 (37 FR 10842), EPA approved, with certain
exceptions, the initial SIPs for 50 states, four territories and the
District of Columbia. Since 1972, each state and territory has
submitted numerous SIP revisions, either on their own initiative, or
because they were required to as a result of various amendments to the
CAA. EPA codifies its approvals and disapprovals of SIPs and SIP
revisions in 40 CFR part 52 (``Approval and promulgation of
implementation plans'').
    The Hawaii SIP is identified in subpart M (``Hawaii'') of part 52.
As with other State SIPs, EPA has taken a number of actions since 1972
with respect to the Hawaii SIP. In 1997, under CAA section 110(k)(6),
we deleted certain variance-related provisions from the Hawaii SIP that
we determined had been erroneously approved by us in the past. See 62
FR 34641 (June 27, 1997). In so doing, we mistakenly identified the
variance-related provision erroneously approved on May 31, 1972 as
``Chapter 43, Section 7.'' See 62 FR 34641, at 34648. The variance-
related provision is found in section 20 of chapter 43 (Air Pollution
Control Regulations) rather than section 7. In addition, we
inadvertently neglected to remove various other variance-related rules
and statutory provisions from the Hawaii SIP, including Air Pollution
Control Law, Hawaii Revised Statutes, chapter 322, part V, section 322-
68, approved on May 31, 1972 (37 FR 10842); S.B. No. 1382-72, Act 100,
section 7, approved on November 8, 1973 (38 FR 30876); chapter 43,
section 20, approved on May 14, 1973 (38 FR 12711); and Hawaii Statute
on Environmental Quality, Hawaii Revised Statutes, chapter 342, section
342-7 (48 FR 37402), approved on August 18, 1983 (48 FR 37402).
    In 2005, we revised the format of subpart M (``Hawaii'') in 40 CFR
part 52 for materials submitted by the State of Hawaii that are
incorporated by reference into the Hawaii SIP. See 70 FR 44852 (August
4, 2005). In so doing, we mistakenly identified the original plan as
``Implementation Plan for Compliance With the Ambient Air Quality
Standards for the State of Hawaii.'' Actually, the title of the
original plan is ``State of Hawaii Air Pollution Control Implementation
Plan.'' Also, in our 2005 final rule, we listed all of the rules that
we believed to be federally enforceable but neglected to list certain
rules that had been approved in the early 1970s and that have never
been withdrawn or replaced. These include the following sections of
chapter 43, Air Pollution Control Regulations: section 22 (``Hearings
and Appeals'') and section 23 (``Application''). These rules were
submitted by the State of Hawaii on November 21, 1972 and January 28,
1972, respectively, and were approved by EPA on May 14, 1973 (38 FR
12711) and May 31, 1972 (37 FR 10842), respectively.

II. Error Correction

    Section 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990,
provides, ``Whenever the Administrator determines that the
Administrator's action approving, disapproving, or promulgating any
plan or plan revision (or part thereof), area designation,
redesignation, classification or reclassification was in error, the
Administrator may in the same manner as the approval, disapproval, or
promulgation revise such action as appropriate without requiring any
further submission from the State. Such determination and the basis
thereof shall be provided to the State and the public.''
    We interpret this provision to authorize the Agency to make
corrections to a promulgated regulation when it is shown to our
satisfaction that (1) we clearly erred in failing to consider or in
inappropriately considering information made available to EPA at the
time of the promulgation, or the information made available at the time
of promulgation is subsequently demonstrated to have been clearly
inadequate, and (2) other information persuasively supports a change in
the regulation. See 57 FR 56762, at 56763 (November 30, 1992).
    In this instance, we find clear errors in our 1997 final rule
removing certain variance-related provisions from the Hawaii SIP. The
first error involved identification of the wrong section number, and
the second error involved the failure to list the other variance-
related provisions in the Hawaii SIP. As discussed in our June 27, 1997
final rule (see at 62 FR 34641, at 34642), variance provisions were
rendered without legal effect by amendments to the CAA enacted by
Congress in 1977 and the

presence of these provisions in the SIPs is potentially confusing, and
thus, harmful to the regulated community, the states and EPA. For a
more detailed discussion of our rationale for removing variance
provisions from SIPs, see 61 FR 38664, at 38665 (July 25, 1996). To
correct these errors, we are correcting the section number (for the
variance provision in chapter 43 as approved in May 1972) and deleting
the additional variance-related provisions approved on May 31, 1972,
May 14, 1973, November 8, 1973, and August 18, 1983.
    Second, we find clear errors in our 2005 final rule re-formatting
our approvals of submittals of the Hawaii SIP and SIP revisions. We
erred first by incorrectly identifying the title of the original Hawaii
plan and then by failing to list two additional rules approved by EPA
as part of the Hawaii SIP that were never withdrawn or replaced. To
correct these errors, we are correcting the title of the original
Hawaii SIP in 40 CFR 52.622(a) and adding the entries for the two
additional rules into the table of EPA-approved regulations in 40 CFR
52.620(c).

III. Public Comment and Final Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(6) of the Act, and for the reasons
set forth above, EPA is correcting errors in certain final rules
approving or compiling the Hawaii state implementation plan.
Specifically, we are correcting the section number (for the variance
provision in chapter 43 as approved in May 1972) and deleting the
additional variance-related provisions approved on May 31, 1972, May
14, 1973, November 8, 1973, and August 18, 1983. We are also revising
the title of the original Hawaii SIP in 40 CFR 52.622(a) and adding the
entries for the two additional rules (chapter 43, sections 22 and 23)
as approved on May 14, 1973 and May 31, 1972, respectively, into the
table of EPA-approved regulations in 40 CFR 52.620(c).
    We do not think anyone will object to this approval, so we are
finalizing it without proposing it in advance. However, in the Proposed
Rules section of this Federal Register, we are simultaneously proposing
approval of the same action. If we receive adverse comments by April
15, 2009, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register
to notify the public that the direct final approval will not take
effect and we will address the comments in a subsequent final action
based on the proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse comments,
the direct final approval will be effective without further notice on
May 15, 2009.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely corrects previous actions approving
state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 15, 2009. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment
in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this
action published in the proposed rules section of today's Federal
Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of
this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review
nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review
may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: February 25, 2009.
Jane Diamond,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

0
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart M--Hawaii

0
2. In Sec.  52.620, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the table heading and adding the entries to the beginning of the table
for ``Department of Health, Public Health Regulations, chapter 43, Air
Pollution Control Regulations,'' sections 22 and 23 to read as follows:

Sec.  52.620  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                    EPA Approved State of Hawaii Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                           EPA approval
          State citation                Title/subject     Effective date       date             Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Department of Health, Public
 Health Regulations, chapter 43,
 Air Pollution Control
 Regulations:
    Section 22....................  Hearings and Appeals      12/26/1972      05/14/1973  38 FR 12711
    Section 23....................  Application.........      03/28/1972      05/31/1972  37 FR 10842

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

0
3. Section 52.622 is amended as follows:
0
a. By revising paragraph (a).
0
b. By revising paragraph (b)(1).
0
c. By adding paragraph (c)(4)(i) and adding and reserving paragraph
(c)(4)(ii).
0
d. By adding paragraph (c)(5)(i), and adding and reserving paragraph
(c)(5)(ii).
0
e. By adding paragraph (c)(15)(i) and adding and reserving paragraph
(c)(15)(ii). The amendments are as follows:

Sec.  52.622  Original identification of plan.

    (a) This section identified the original ``State of Hawaii Air
Pollution Control Implementation Plan'' and all revisions submitted by
the State of Hawaii that were federally approved prior to June 1, 2005.
    (b) * * *
    (1) Previously approved on May 31, 1972 in paragraph (b) of this
section and now deleted from the SIP without replacement Air Pollution
Control Law, Hawaii Revised Statutes, chapter 322, part V, section 322-
68 and Public Health Regulations, chapter 43, section 20.
    (c) * * *
    (4) * * *
    (i) Previously approved on November 8, 1973 in paragraph (c)(4) of
this section and now deleted from the SIP without replacement S.B. No.
1382-72, Act 100, section 7.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (5) * * *
    (i) Previously approved on May 14, 1973 in paragraph (c)(5) of this
section and now deleted from the SIP without replacement chapter 43,
section 20.
    (ii) [Reserved]
* * * * *
    (15) * * *
    (i) Previously approved on August 18, 1983 in paragraph (c)(15) of
this section and now deleted from the SIP without replacement Hawaii
Statute on Environmental Quality, Hawaii Revised Statutes, chapter 342,
section 342-7.
    (ii) [Reserved]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-4802 Filed 3-13-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 114 (Thursday, June 13, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35574-35575]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14034]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2013 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0397; Directorate Identifier 2013-NE-15-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG
Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) model Tay 650-15 turbofan
engines. This proposed AD was prompted by excessive deterioration of
the high-pressure (HP) air bleed valve operating mechanism. This
proposed AD would require a one-time inspection of the HP air bleed
valve operating mechanism and, depending on findings, corrective
action. We are proposing this AD to prevent multiple fan blade failure,
which could result in uncontained engine failure and damage to the
airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 12, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG, Eschenweg 11, Dahlewitz, 15827
Blankenfelde-Mahlow, Germany; phone: 49 0 33-7086-1944; fax: 49 0 33-
7086-3276. You may view this service information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
781-238-7125.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the
same as the Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frederick Zink, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0397;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NE-15-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search
function of the Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets, including, if provided, the name of the individual who
sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477-78).

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013-0086, dated April 9, 2013, to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified products. That mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:

    A review of the service history of Tay engines discovered that
the High Pressure (HP) air bleed valve operating mechanism could be
a subject of excessive deterioration, influencing the aerodynamics
and stability of the Low Pressure (LP) compressor (fan) rotor.
    This condition, if not corrected, could reduce fan flutter
margin and, in some cases, could lead to multiple fan blade
failures, possibly resulting in an uncontained release of high
energy debris with consequent damage to, and/or reduced control of,
the aeroplane.

We are proposing this AD to prevent multiple fan blade failure, which
could result in uncontained engine failure and damage to the airplane.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    RRD has issued Alert Non-Modification Service Bulletin (NMSB) No.
TAY-75-A1784, dated February 14, 2013. The NMSB describes procedures
for inspection of the HP air bleed valve operating mechanism and
corrective action, if necessary.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of Germany
and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the European Community, EASA has notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all
information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other

products of the same type design. This proposed AD would require a one-
time inspection of the HP air bleed valve operating mechanism and,
depending on findings, corrective action.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 52 Tay turbofan engines
installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 10 hours per engine to comply with this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per hour. Required parts cost about $153 per
product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $52,156.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Turbofan Engines (formerly
Rolls-Royce plc): Docket No. FAA-2013-0397; Directorate Identifier
2013-NE-15-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by August 12, 2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD)
model Tay 650-15 turbofan engines.

(d) Reason

    This AD was prompted by excessive deterioration of the high-
pressure (HP) air bleed valve operating mechanism which affects the
aerodynamic flutter margin, causing subsequent multiple fan blade
failure. We are issuing this AD to prevent multiple fan blade
failure, which could result in uncontained engine failure and damage
to the airplane.

(e) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Within 1,500 flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD, perform a one-time inspection of the HP air bleed valve
operating mechanism. Use paragraphs 3.D. and 3.E. of RRD Alert Non-
Modification Service Bulletin (NMSB) No. TAY-75-A1784, dated
February 14, 2013, to do your inspection.
    (2) If the measured torque necessary to open and close the HP
air bleed valve is higher than the torque values referenced in
paragraph 3.D.(1)(a) of RRD Alert NMSB No. TAY-75-A1784, dated
February 14, 2013, then before next flight, accomplish paragraph
3.E. of RRD Alert NMSB No. TAY-75-A1784, dated February 14, 2013.

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, Engine Certification Office, may approve AMOCs for
this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request.

(g) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Frederick Zink,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Refer to European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2013-0086, dated April 9, 2013, and RRD Alert NMSB No.
TAY-75-A1784, dated February 14, 2013, for related information.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG, Eschenweg 11, Dahlewitz, 15827
Blankenfelde-Mahlow, Germany; phone: 49 0 33-7086-1944; fax: 49 0
33-7086-3276. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on June 6, 2013.
Colleen M. D'Alessandro,
Assistant Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-14034 Filed 6-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 73636]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29802]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14345-001]

Rock River Beach, Inc.; Notice of Application Tendered for Filing
With the Commission and Soliciting Additional Study Requests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Original Minor License.
    b. Project No.: P-14345-001.
    c. Date filed: November 23, 2012.
    d. Applicant: Rock River Beach, Inc.
    e. Name of Project: Rock River Beach Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Rock River, in the Town of Onota, Alger County,
Michigan.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 USC 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Mary C. Edgar, 2617 Rockwood, East Lansing,
MI 48823; or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Aaron Liberty at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Cooperating agencies: Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies
with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect to
environmental issues that wish to cooperate in the preparation of the
environmental document should follow the instructions for filing such
requests described in item l below. Cooperating agencies should note
the Commission's policy that agencies that cooperate in the preparation
of the environmental document cannot also intervene. See, 94 FERC ]
61,076 (2001).
    k. Pursuant to section 4.32(b)(7) of 18 CFR of the Commission's
regulations, if any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person believes
that an additional scientific study should be conducted in order to
form an adequate factual basis for a complete analysis of the
application on its merit, the resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person
must file a request for a study with the Commission not later than 60
days from the date of filing of the application, and serve a copy of
the request on the applicant.
    l. Deadline for filing additional study requests and requests for
cooperating agency status: January 22, 2013.
    All documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration,
using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the
end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426.
    m. The application is not ready for environmental analysis at this
time.
    n. The Rock River Beach Project consists of the following existing
facilities: (1) A 33.6-foot-long by 5.5-foot-high, L-shaped gravity dam
with a crest elevation of 606.95 feet NAVD 88; (2) a 5-acre reservoir
with a total storage capacity of about 25 acre-feet at the normal
reservoir water surface elevation of 606.95 feet NAVD 88; (3) a 30-
foot-wide by 50-foot-long power canal; (4) an 18-foot by 24-foot wood-
framed powerhouse housing a 3-kilowatt (kW) generating unit and a 5-kW
generating unit for a total installed capacity of 8 kW; and (5) two,
220-volt, 0.5-mile-long transmission lines.
    The applicant operates the project in a run-of-river mode (i.e., at
any point in time, the combined outflow from the project's dam and
powerhouse approximates all inflows to the project's reservoir).
Diversion of river flow through the 50-foot-long power canal and to the
powerhouse creates a 100-foot-long bypassed reach in the Rock River.
Average annual generation at the project varies between 9,000 and
18,000 kilowatt-hours.
    All of the existing project facilities are owned by the applicant.
The applicant proposes no new facilities.
    The proposed project is currently unlicensed and was found to be
jurisdictional, because it is located on a Commerce Clause water and
affects the interests of interstate commerce. See, 103 FERC ] 62,180
(2003).
    o. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item h above.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    p. With this notice, we are initiating consultation with the
Michigan State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), as required by
section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
regulations of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 36 CFR
800.4.
    q. Procedural schedule: The application will be processed according
to the following preliminary Hydro Licensing Schedule. Revisions to the
schedule will be made as appropriate.

Issue Notice of Acceptance--February 2013
Issue Scoping Document 1 for comments--March 2013
Comments due on Scoping Document 1--April 2013
Issue Scoping Document 2--May 2013
Issue notice of ready for environmental analysis--July 2013
Issue Environmental Assessment (EA)--December 2013
Comments due on EA--January 2013

    Dated: November 30, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-29802 Filed 12-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US

05/02/2008 01:24 PM

To

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

Current version of exec summ and ch 1

Heidi, here are the latest versions of the Exec Summ and chapter 1, 3 more e-mails to follow

Ron Evans

Leader, Air Benefit & Cost Group

HEID/OAQPS/OAR/EPA

Mail Drop C-439-02

919-541-5488


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 85 (Thursday, May 2, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25666-25669]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10361]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0360; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-033-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) that applies to all Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series
airplanes. The existing AD currently requires revising the airplane
flight manual (AFM) to advise the flightcrew of emergency procedures
for addressing angle of attack (AoA) sensor blockage. The existing AD
also provides for optional terminating action for the AFM revision,
which involves replacing AoA sensor conic plates with AoA sensor flat
plates. Since we issued that AD, we have determined that the
replacement of AoA sensor conic plates is necessary to address the
identified unsafe condition. This proposed AD would mandate the
installation of AoA sensor flat plates and removal of the AFM revision.
We are proposing this AD to prevent reduced control of the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 17, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will

be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0360;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-033-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On December 27, 2012, we issued AD 2012-26-51, Amendment 39-17312
(78 FR 1723, January 9, 2013). That AD required actions intended to
address an unsafe condition on all Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and
A321 series airplanes.
    Since we issued AD 2012-26-51, Amendment 39-17312 (78 FR 1723,
January 9, 2013), we have determined that the replacement of the AoA
sensor conic plates with flat plates is necessary to address the
identified unsafe condition. The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Community, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013-0022,
dated February 1, 2013 (referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    Recently, an Airbus A330 aeroplane equipped with Angle of Attack
(AoA) sensors with conic plates installed, experienced blockage of
all sensors during climb, leading to autopilot disconnection and
activation of the alpha protection (Alpha Prot) when Mach number was
increased.
    Based on the results of the subsequent analysis, it is suspected
that these conic plates may have contributed to the event.
Investigations are on-going to determine what caused the blockage of
these AoA sensors.
    Blockage of two or three AoA sensors at the same angle may cause
the Alpha Prot of the normal law to activate. Under normal flight
conditions (in normal law), if the Alpha Prot activates and Mach
number increases, the flight control laws order a pitch down of the
aeroplane that the flight crew may be unable to counteract with a
side stick deflection, even in the full backward position.
    This condition, if not corrected, could result in reduced
control of the aeroplane.
    AoA conic plates of similar design are also installed on A320
family aeroplanes, and installation of these AoA sensor conic plates
was required by EASA AD 2012-0236, making reference to Airbus
Service Bulletin (SB) A320-34-1521 for in-service modification.
    That requirement was deleted by EASA AD 2012-0236R1.
    To address this potential unsafe condition on A320 family
aeroplanes, Airbus developed an ``AOA Blocked'' emergency procedure,
published as a temporary revision (TR) of the Airplane Flight Manual
(AFM), to ensure that flight crews, in case of AoA sensors blockage,
apply the applicable emergency procedure.
    Consequently, EASA issued Emergency AD 2012-0264-E [which
corresponds to FAA AD 2012-26-51, Amendment 39-17312 (78 FR 1723,
January 9, 2013)] to require amendment of the AFM by incorporating
the Airbus TR.
    Since that [EASA] AD was issued, Airbus published approved
instructions to re-install AoA sensor flat plates on A320 family
aeroplanes.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2012-0264-E which is superseded, and
requires installation of AoA sensor flat plates, after which the AFM
operational procedure can be removed.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
    In AD 2012-26-51, Amendment 39-17312 (78 FR 1723, January 9, 2013),
we determined that the AFM operational procedure specified in Airbus
A318/A319/A320/A321 Temporary Revision TR286, Issue 1.0, dated December
17, 2012, mitigates risks associated with installation of conic plates.
This proposed AD would require installation of flat plates to address
the identified unsafe condition. After analysis of the safety benefit
of the AFM operational procedure, we determined that the previously
mandated AFM operational procedure must be removed after replacement of
the conic plates with flat plates.
    Paragraph (h) of AD 2012-26-51, Amendment 39-17312 (78 FR 1723,
January 9, 2013), only specifies that Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
Temporary Revision TR286, Issue 1.0, dated December 17, 2012, may be
removed after accomplishing the modification (installation of flat
plates). Therefore, we have revised paragraph (h) of this proposed AD
to require that after the modification for an airplane has been done,
Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Temporary Revision TR286, Issue 1.0, dated
December 17, 2012, must be removed before further flight. For airplanes
on which the modification has already been done, we have allowed a
compliance time of ``within 5 days after the effective date of this
AD'' for accomplishing the removal.

Relevant Service Information

    Airbus has issued Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-34-1564,
including Appendix 01, dated January 25, 2013. The actions described in
this service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 100 products of U.S. registry.
    The actions that are required by AD 2012-26-51, Amendment 39-17312
(78 FR 1723, January 9, 2013), and retained in this proposed AD take
about 1 work-hour per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per work
hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the currently
required actions is $85 per product.
    We estimate that it would take about 7 work-hours per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide part cost estimates. Where the service
information lists required parts costs that are covered under warranty,
we have assumed that there will be no charge for these parts. As we do
not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some parties may
incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of the

proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $59,500, or $595 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2012-26-51, Amendment 39-17312 (78 FR 1723, January 9, 2013), and
adding the following new AD:

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2013-0360; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-
033-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by June 17, 2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes AD 2012-26-51, Amendment 39-17312 (78 FR
1723, January 9, 2013).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes listed in paragraphs
(c)(1) through (c)(4) of this AD, certificated in any category, all
manufacturer serial numbers.
    (1) Airbus Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes.
    (2) Airbus Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132,
and -133 airplanes.
    (3) Airbus Model A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -
233 airplanes.
    (4) Airbus Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231,
and -232 airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 34, Navigation.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a determination that replacement of
angle of attack (AoA) sensor conic plates is necessary to address
the identified unsafe condition. We are issuing this AD to prevent
reduced control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Retained Airplane Flight Manual Revision With New Exception

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2012-26-51, Amendment 39-17312 (78 FR 1723, January 9, 2013), with a
new exception. Except as specified in paragraph (k) of this AD, for
airplanes on which an AoA sensor conic plate is installed in
production by Airbus modification 153213 or 153214, or in-service as
specified in Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-34-1521, dated
May 7, 2012; or Revision 01, dated September 12, 2012: Within 5 days
after January 24, 2013 (the effective date of AD 2012-26-51), revise
the Emergency Procedures of the Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Airplane
Flight Manual (AFM) by inserting Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
Temporary Revision (TR) TR286, Issue 1.0, dated December 17, 2012,
to advise the flightcrew of emergency procedures for addressing AoA
sensor blockage. When the information in Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
Temporary Revision TR286, Issue 1.0, dated December 17, 2012, is
included in the general revisions of the AFM, the general revisions
may be inserted in the AFM, and the TR may be removed.
Accomplishment of the new flat plate installation required by
paragraph (j) of this AD terminates the actions required by this
paragraph; and after the installation of new flat plates has been
done, Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Temporary Revision TR286, Issue
1.0, dated December 17, 2012, must be removed from the AFM before
further flight.

(h) Retained Optional Terminating Action With Revised TR Removal
Requirement

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2012-26-51, Amendment 39-17312 (78 FR 1723, January 9, 2013), with a
revised TR removal requirement. Modification of an airplane by
replacing AoA sensor conic plates with AoA sensor flat plates, in
accordance with a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, constitutes
terminating action for the AFM revision required by paragraph (g) of
this AD; and after the modification has been done, Airbus A318/A319/
A320/A321 Temporary Revision TR286, Issue 1.0, dated December 17,
2012, must be removed from the AFM before further flight, except for
airplanes on which the modification has been done before the
effective date of this AD. For airplanes on which the modification
has been done before the effective date of this AD, Airbus A318/
A319/A320/A321 Temporary Revision TR286, Issue 1.0, dated December
17, 2012, must be removed from the AFM within 5 days after the
effective date of this AD. Accomplishment of the actions required by
paragraphs (j) and (l) of this AD terminate the actions specified in
this paragraph.

(i) Retained Parts Installation Prohibition

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD
2012-26-51, Amendment 39-17312 (78 FR 1723, January 9, 2013). As of
January 24, 2013 (the effective date of AD 2012-26-51), no person
may install an AoA sensor conic plate in service using Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-34-1521, dated May 7, 2012; or
Revision 01, dated September 12, 2012; on any airplane.

(j) New Flat Plate Installation

    Within 5 months after the effective date of this AD, remove all
AoA sensor conic plates having part number (P/N) F3411060200000 or
P/N F3411060900000 and install AoA sensor flat plates having part
numbers specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD, except
as specified in paragraph (k) of this AD. Install the AoA sensor
plates in accordance with the applicable method specified in
paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD. Accomplishment of the AoA
sensor flat plate installation terminates the AFM revision required
by paragraph (g) of this AD; and after accomplishing the
installation, the

actions specified in paragraph (l) of this AD must be done.
    (1) Install P/N D3411013520200 in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A320-34-1564, including Appendix 01, dated January 25, 2013.
    (2) Install P/N D3411007620000 or P/N D3411013520000, in
accordance with a method approved by either the Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA;
or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or its delegated
agent).

(k) New Exception to Paragraphs (g) and (j) of This AD

    An airplane on which Airbus modification 154863 (installation of
AOA sensor flat plate) and modification 154864 (coating protection)
have been embodied in production is not affected by the requirements
of paragraph (g) or (j) of this AD, provided that, since first
flight, no AoA sensor conic plate having P/N F3411060200000 or P/N
F3411060900000 has been installed on that airplane.

(l) New Removal of AFM Revision

    After modification of an airplane as required by paragraph (j)
of this AD, Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Temporary Revision TR286,
Issue 1.0, dated December 17, 2012, that was inserted into the
Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 AFM as required by paragraph (g) of this
AD is no longer required and must be removed from the AFM of that
airplane before further flight.

(m) New Parts Installation Prohibition

    (1) As of the effective date of this AD, for any airplane that
has AoA sensor flat plates installed: As of the effective date of
this AD, do not install any AoA sensor conic plate having P/N
F3411060200000 or P/N F3411060900000, and do not use any AoA
protection cover having P/N 98D34203003000.
    (2) For any airplane that has AoA sensor conic plates installed:
As of the effective date of this AD, after modification of the
airplane as required by paragraph (j) of this AD, do not install any
AoA sensor conic plate having P/N F3411060200000 or P/N
F3411060900000, and do not use any AoA protection cover having P/N
98D34203003000.

(n) Special Flight Permits

    Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
Sec. Sec.  21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the airplane can be modified (if the operator elects to do so),
provided Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Temporary Revision TR286, Issue
1.0, dated December 17, 2012, has been inserted into the Emergency
Procedures of the Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 AFM.

(o) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay
Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information may
be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(p) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013-0022, dated February 1,
2013; Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-34-1564, including
Appendix 01, dated January 25, 2013; and Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
Temporary Revision TR286, Issue 1.0, dated December 17, 2012.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 23, 2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-10361 Filed 5-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3471-3472]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1281]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2319-002; ER10-2320-002; ER10-2317-001; ER10-
2322-003; ER10-2324-002; ER10-2325-001; ER10-2332-002; ER10-2326-003;
ER10-2327-004; ER10-2328-002; ER10-2343-003; ER10-2331-003; ER10-2330-
003; ER11-4609-001.
    Applicants: J.P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corporation, Triton Power
Michigan LLC, BE Allegheny LLC, BE CA LLC, BE Ironwood LLC, BE KJ LLC,
BE Rayle LLC, BE Alabama LLC, BE Louisiana LLC, Cedar Brakes I LLC,
Central Power & Lime LLC, Cedar Brakes II LLC, J.P. Morgan Commodities
Canada Corporation, Utility Contract Funding LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of J.P. Morgan
Ventures Energy Corporation et al.
    Filed Date: 1/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120112-5128.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/2/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3876-001; ER11-2044-002; ER10-2611-001.
    Applicants: Cordova Energy Company LLC, MidAmerican Energy Company,
Saranac Power Partners, L.P.
    Description: Revised transmittal letter to triennial update filed
June 30, 2011 of Cordova Energy Company LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 7/1/11.
    Accession Number: 20110701-5295.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3876-001; ER11-2044-002; ER10-2611-001.
    Applicants: Cordova Energy Company, LLC, MidAmerican Energy
Company, Saranac Power Partners, L.P.

    Description: Revised Attachment B to replace Attachment B in
Applicants' June 30 market analysis of Cordova Energy Company LLC, et
al.
    Filed Date: 7/6/11.
    Accession Number: 20110706-5086.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-795-000.
    Applicants: High Liner Foods Incorporated.
    Description: High Liner Foods Incorporated submits tariff filing
per 35.12: MBR Application Filing to be effective 2/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 1/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120112-5061.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/2/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-796-000.
    Applicants: CalPeak Power--El Cajon LLC.
    Description: CalPeak Power--El Cajon LLC submits tariff filing per
35.15: Cancellation of Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 3/12/
2012.
    Filed Date: 1/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120112-5081.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/2/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-798-000.
    Applicants: Tatanka Wind Power, LLC.
    Description: Tatanka Wind Power, LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Compliance Filing to be effective 1/12/2012.
    Filed Date: 1/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120112-5103.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/2/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-799-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Solar One, LLC.
    Description: Nevada Solar One, LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Compliance Filing--Clone to be effective 1/12/2012.
    Filed Date: 1/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120112-5107.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/2/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-800-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. Capacity Supply Obligation--
Resource Termination--RIE Genco.
    Filed Date: 1/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120112-5125.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/2/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-801-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2299 Rattlesnake Creek Wind Project GIA to be
effective 12/14/2011.
    Filed Date: 1/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120112-5127.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/2/12.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: January 12, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-1281 Filed 1-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 46 (Thursday, March 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14622-14625]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04845]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2022-N-0150]

Revocation of Two Authorizations of Emergency Use of In Vitro
Diagnostic Devices for Detection and/or Diagnosis of COVID-19;
Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
revocation of the Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) (the
Authorizations) issued to Babson Diagnostics, Inc., for the Babson
Diagnostics aC19G1, and Twist Bioscience Corporation for the SARS-CoV-2
NGS Assay. FDA revoked these Authorizations under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) as requested by each Authorization
holder. The revocations, which include an explanation of the reasons
for each revocation, are reprinted at the end of this document.

DATES: The Authorization for the Babson Diagnostics aC19G1 is revoked
as of February 14, 2023. The Authorization for the SARS-CoV-2 NGS Assay
is revoked as of February 14, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for a single copy of the revocations
to the Office of Policy, Center for Devices and Radiological Health,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave. Bldg. 66, Rm.
5431, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive
label to assist that office in processing your request or include a Fax
number to which the revocations may be sent. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic access to the revocations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim Sapsford-Medintz, Office of
Product Evaluation and Quality, Center for Devices and Radiological
Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave. Bldg.
66, Rm. 3216, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER> (this is not a
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Section 564 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3) as amended by the
Project BioShield Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-276) and the Pandemic and
All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act of 2013 (Pub. L. 113-5)
allows FDA to strengthen the public health protections against
biological, chemical, nuclear, and radiological agents. Among other
things, section 564 of the FD&C Act allows FDA to authorize the use of
an unapproved medical product or an unapproved use of an approved
medical product in certain situations. On June 23, 2020, FDA issued the
Authorization to Babson Diagnostics, Inc., for the Babson Diagnostics
aC19G1, subject to the terms of the Authorization. Notice of the
issuance of this Authorization was published in the Federal Register on
November 20, 2020 (85 FR 74346), as required by section 564(h)(1) of
the FD&C Act. On March 23, 2021, FDA issued the Authorization to Twist
Bioscience Corporation for the SARS-CoV-2 NGS Assay, subject to the
terms of the Authorization. Notice of the issuance of this
Authorization was published in the Federal Register on July 23, 2021
(86 FR 39040), as required by section 564(h)(1) of the FD&C Act.
Subsequent updates to the Authorizations were made available on FDA's
website. The authorization of a device for emergency use under section
564 of the FD&C Act may, pursuant to section 564(g)(2) of the FD&C Act,
be revoked when the criteria under section 564(c) of the FD&C Act for
issuance of such authorization are no longer met (section 564(g)(2)(B)
of the FD&C Act), or other circumstances make such revocation
appropriate to protect the public health or safety (section
564(g)(2)(C) of the FD&C Act).

II. Authorization Revocation Requests

    In a request received by FDA on February 7, 2023, Babson
Diagnostics, Inc., requested the revocation of, and on February 14,
2023, FDA revoked, the Authorization for the Babson Diagnostics aC19G1.
Because Babson Diagnostics, Inc., notified FDA that it is no longer
offering the Babson Diagnostics aC19G1and requested FDA revoke the
Babson Diagnostics aC19G1, FDA has determined that it is appropriate to
protect the public health or safety to revoke this Authorization.
    In a request received by FDA on January 27, 2023, Twist Bioscience
Corporation requested withdrawal of, and on February 14, 2023, FDA
revoked, the Authorization for the SARS-CoV-2 NGS Assay. Because Twist
Bioscience Corporation notified FDA that it will no longer be using the
SARS-CoV-2 NGS Assay and requested FDA withdraw the Authorization for
the SARS-CoV-2 NGS Assay, FDA has determined that it is appropriate to
protect the public health or safety to revoke this Authorization.

III. Electronic Access

    An electronic version of this document and the full text of the
revocations are available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov/.

IV. The Revocations

    Having concluded that the criteria for revocation of the
Authorizations under section 564(g)(2)(C) of the FD&C Act are met, FDA
has revoked the EUA of Babson Diagnostics, Inc., for the Babson
Diagnostics aC19G1 and of Twist Bioscience Corporation for the SARS-
CoV-2 NGS Assay. The revocations in their entirety follow and provide
an explanation of the reasons for each revocation, as required by
section 564(h)(1) of the FD&C Act.

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09MR23.008

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09MR23.009

    Dated: March 6, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-04845 Filed 3-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P