PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request U. S. EPA, Manufacturing Energy and Transportation Div. 2. OMB control number b. G None a_ 2060  0330_ __ __ __ __ __

3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. G New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. X Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a. X Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes X No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. X Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Facilities ( Surface Coating) CFR 40 Part 63, Subpart II 8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) 1712.03 9. Keywords Ship building, Repair, environmental protection, Marine Coatings, depainting operations, catalytic incinerators, HEPA filter systrems, carbon absorbers.

10. Abstract The respondents are owners or operators of Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Facilities. Operations covered include: primer and top coat application in manufacturing processes and in ship repair processes. The Administrator has determined that HAP and VOC emissions from Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Facilities cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. In order to ensure compliance with the standards promulgated to protect public health, adequate record keeping and reporting is necessary.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. P Business or other for profit e. X Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. X State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. G Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. P Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and record keeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 45 b. Total annual responses 45 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically % c. Total annual hours requested 22,149 d. Current OMB inventory 27,034 e. Difference ( 4,885)

f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 2. Adjustment ( 4,885) 14. Annual reporting and record keeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars) a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs 0 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) 0 c. Total annualized cost requested 0 d. Current OMB inventory 49 e. Difference ( 49) f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change 2. Adjustment ( 49)

15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. _ P_ Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of record keeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. X Record keeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. X Reporting 1. Q On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. X Semi annually 6. Q Annually 7. Q Biannually 8. Q Other ( describe) 17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes X No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Anthony Raia Phone: 202 564 6045 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and record keeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for record keeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( i) Why the information is being collected; ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement. Signature of Program Office Official John B. Rasnic Director, Manufacturing Energy and Transportation Divsion Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Joseph Retzer, Director Regulatory Information Division Office of Regulatory Management and Information ( OPIE) Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55641-55645]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22049]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2011-0968; FRL-9916-47-Region 5]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Indiana; Open Burning Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a
November 14, 2011, request by Indiana to revise the state
implementation plan (SIP) to incorporate the open burning provisions in
Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC), Article 4, Rule 1
(326 IAC 4-1), Open Burning Rule. EPA is approving this rule for
attainment counties and is taking no action on the rule for Clark,
Floyd, Lake and Porter counties which are nonattainment or maintenance
areas for ozone (O3) or particulate matter (PM).

DATES: This direct final rule will be effective November 17, 2014,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by October 17, 2014. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2011-0968, by one of the following methods:
    1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Control Strategies
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information. The Regional Office official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2011-0968. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your

identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without
going through www.regulations.gov your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This Facility is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
We recommend that you telephone Charles Hatten, Environmental Engineer,
(312) 886-6031 before visiting the Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Hatten, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. What is the background for this action?
II. Discussion of State Submittal
III. What action is EPA taking today?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What is the background for this action?

    Open burning is generally prohibited in the state of Indiana.
Indiana state law exempts certain open burning activities under
conditions that minimize the impact on the air quality and public
health. Open burning activities allowed include: maintenance burning,
recreational or ceremonial fires, farm burning, waste oil burning,
prescribed used to facilitate the growth of desired vegetation, and
residential burning.
    Indiana's open burning rule at 326 IAC 4-1 [formerly Air Pollution
Code-2, (APC-2)] applies state-wide and was first approved on June 22,
1978 (43 FR 26722), and re-codified on July 16, 1982 (47 FR 30972). On
February 1, 1996 (61 FR 3581), EPA approved a ban on residential open
burning for Clark, Floyd, Lake and Porter counties to reduce VOC
emissions as part of Indiana's fifteen (15) percent rate of progress
plan for the 1-hour O3 standard. This ban on residential
open burning remains a permanent and enforceable control measure in the
state's O3 SIP.
    On November 14, 2011, the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (IDEM) submitted a request to EPA to revise 326 IAC 4-1.
IDEM published several newspaper notices (March 31, 2011, June 25,
2011) informing the public of the revisions to 326 IAC 4-1-3 and 326
IAC 4-1-4. IDEM held a public hearing on these revisions on August 3,
2011. There were no comments received. IDEM's November 14, 2011,
submittal also included certification that adoption of the revisions at
326 IAC 4-1-0.5, 326 IAC 4-1-1, 326 IAC 4-1-2, 326 IAC 4-1-3, 326 IAC
4-1-4, 326 IAC 4-1-4.1, 326 IAC 4-1-4.2, and 326 IAC 4-1-4.3, had been
preceded by adequate notice and public hearing.

II. Discussion of State Submittal

    Below is a discussion of Indiana's rule, including an
identification of any significant changes from the previously approved
SIP.

 4-1-0.5 Definitions

    This section defines several terms, including a revised definition
of ``open burn.'' IDEM consolidated the definition of the terms from
326 IAC 4-1, ``open burning'' and ``open'' into one definition at 326
IAC 4-1-0.5(6), ``open burn.'' The term ``open burn'' means, the
burning of any materials wherein air contaminants resulting from
combustion are emitted directly into the air, without passing through a
stack or chimney from an enclosed chamber. This revision provides
clarity to the definition of ``open burn'' and is approvable into the
Indiana SIP.

 4-1-1 Scope

    This section describes the rule's applicability. The applicability
remains consistent with the existing SIP and continues to apply to all
open burning state-wide.
    Because the revisions to this section are administrative and non-
substantive, EPA finds 326 IAC 4-1-1 remains consistent with the
approved SIP, and therefore, are approvable into Indiana's SIP.

 4-1-2 Prohibition Against Open Burning

    This section prohibits open burning of any material not exempt, or
authorized, unless approval has been granted by the Commissioner or the
Commissioner's designated agent. There were no substantive changes to
this section of the rule. The revision reflects a wording change. The
language in the SIP reads, ``No person shall open burn any material
except as provided in section 3 or 4.'' Indiana's revised the language
now reads, ``Open burning is prohibited except as allowed in this
rule.''
    The revision to this section requires a person or entity subject
this rule to comply with the entire rule and not just certain sections.
Thus, EPA finds the revision to the rule to be consistent with the
approved SIP and is approvable into Indiana's SIP.

 4-1-3 Exemptions

    In the approved SIP, section 3 of 326 IAC 4-1 identifies those
exemptions for certain open burning activities under conditions that
minimize the impact on air quality and public health.
    In section (3)(a)(1) Indiana identifies exemptions in the rule for
open burning for maintenance purposes. This exemption allows open
burning of the following: (1) Vegetation from farms, cemeteries,
drainage ditches and agricultural land, if the burn occurs in an
unincorporated area; (2) wood products from pruning or clearing a
roadside by a county highway department and the initial clearing of a
public utility right-of-way if in an unincorporated area; (3)
undesirable wood structures or remnants; and (4) clean petroleum
products for maintaining or for repairing railroad tracks, but not
including railroad ties. Section (3)(a)(2) applies certain restrictions
to open burning, for maintenance purposes, that is allowed by this
rule. These include: Extinguishing the fire if it creates a nuisance or
a fire hazard; all fires must be attended at all times during burning
until completely extinguished; no burning during unfavorable
meteorological conditions; removal of all asbestos-containing material
before burning of a structure. The language in

this section (3)(a) remains consistent with the existing SIP.
    Section (3)(b) specifies certain conditions that apply to any fires
allowed by this rule in section (3)(c). The language in this section
(3)(b) remains consistent with the existing SIP.
    Section (3)(c) allows the following types of fires: Recreational
and ceremonial fires; private residential burning; and waste oil
burning. IDEM added criteria that would allow the burning of two single
family, non-demolished dwellings per calendar year by municipal fire
departments for the purposes of live fire training subject to certain
conditions, including written notification to IDEM and the removal of
material that would otherwise result in toxic air emissions; and the
ceremonial burning of United States flags. These additional exemptions
are subject to both the conditions in section (3)(b) and more specific
conditions associated with each exemption to limit open burning
emissions.
    The revisions to section 3 of 326 IAC are not anticipated to
increase the amount or frequency of open burning occurring in Indiana,
and therefore, are approvable into the Indiana SIP.

 4-1-4 Emergency Burning

    IDEM revised section 4 renaming it ``Emergency burning''. The SIP
approved language in section 4 of 326 IAC 4-1 identified certain types
of open burning not exempt by the rule that would require a person(s)
to obtain prior approval before open burning by the Air Pollution
Control Board (APCB) or its designated agent. Among the list of open
burnings that IDEM would consider granting approval included emergency
burnings. The revisions address the administrative function associated
with open burning approvals in the event of an emergency. IDEM revised
the rule for emergency burning to require written approval by the
Commissioner. Emergency burnings may be authorized for spilled
petroleum products and clean wood waste, vegetation or deceased animals
under certain conditions.
    This revision serves to help clarify language in the rule regarding
the approval process for emergency burning. Thus, EPA finds the
revision to the rule to be consistent with the approved SIP when open
burning for emergency purposes, and is approvable into the Indiana SIP.

 4-1-4.1 to 4-1-4.3 Open Burning Approval Process

    The open burning ``approval process'' is contained in sections 4-1-
4.1 thru 4-1-4.3. The approval process is designed to simplify the
relevant steps for a person(s) or an entity to submit a request to open
burn or obtain a variance from the Commissioner or the Commissioner's
designated agent, similar to requests for approvals for emergency
burning, as noted above in section 4.
    Below is a discussion of the various parts of Indiana's open
burning approval process.

4-1-4.1 Open Burning Approval; Criteria and Conditions

    Section 4.1(a)--Burning not exempted by Section 3 or 4 of this rule
may be authorized by the issuance of an approval by the Commissioner or
the Commissioner's designated agent, after consideration of an approval
application, for fire training, burning of natural growth derived from
a clearing operation and burning of highly explosive or dangerous
materials for which no alternative disposal method exists, burning of
clean wood products and natural growth.
    Section 4.1(b) specifies the criteria that may be considered for
approval for open burning, including: A demonstration that alternative
methods of disposal are impractical; there are not more than five
residences within 500 feet of the proposed burning site; there have
been no open burning violations at the site of the proposed burning or
the applicant; the burning site is located in a county not designated
as a nonattainment area for PM10 (particles that are 10
micrometers in diameter or smaller) or O3 and is not located
in Clark or Floyd County.
    Section 4.1(c) prohibits approval of residential burning in Clark,
Floyd, Lake or Porter County.
    Section 4.1(d) provides the conditions that any approval for open
burning may be subject to, including: Only clean wood products shall be
burned; no asbestos-containing material shall be burned; no burning
shall be conducted during unfavorable meteorological conditions; and
burning shall be conducted during daylight hours only.
    Section 4.1(e) specifies that an approval letter for open burning
shall be valid for no longer than one year from the date of issuance.
However, an approval letter for open burning may be valid for as long
as five years, if the approval application is accompanied by an open
burning plan which must contain a description of the open burning
proposed.
    Section 4.1(f) states that the Commissioner may add conditions to
an approval letter, as necessary, to prevent a public nuisance or to
protect public health. Such conditions may be based on local air
quality conditions, including whether the area is a nonattainment
county as defined in 326 IAC 1-4-1 or has been redesignated from
nonattainment to attainment status.

4-1-4.2 Open Burning; Approval Revocation

    As a part of the approval process, this section allows the
Commissioner to revoke an approval letter for open burning if the
applicant violates any requirement of Section 4.1(d) or 4.1(f) or
falsifies any information on an application for an approval.

4-1-4.3 Open Burning Approval; Delegation of Authority

    This section of the rule states that the Commissioner may delegate
the authority to issue approval letters for open burning to another
agency that has the necessary legal authority to implement an approval
program.
    EPA finds the ``approval process'' outlined in 326 IAC 4-1-4.1 to
326 IAC 4-1-4.3 to be consistent with the approved SIP. The revisions
to the rule does not relax IDEM's review process, provides clarity, as
well as simplifies the administrative procedures necessary to obtain
approval or a variance to open burn.
    EPA finds Indiana's open burning rule provides a state-wide
prohibition of open burning with reasonable exceptions. Open burning
not specifically exempt may be authorized by the Commissioner for
specific purposes, e.g., fire training or burning of highly explosive
materials, and based upon specified criteria, e.g. alternative methods
of disposal are not feasible and there are not more than five
residences within 500 feet of the proposed burning site. EPA will
recognize approvals for burning not specifically exempted by these
regulations authorized by the Commissioner or the Commissioner's
designated agent provided that a copy of the approval letter and
application be kept on file and made available to EPA upon request.
    The revisions to 326 IAC 4-1 range from wording changes and
additions, improve and expand the applicability of the rule and its
impact on air quality statewide. EPA is approving this rule for
attainment counties and is taking no action on the rule for Clark,
Floyd, Lake and Porter counties which are nonattainment or maintenance
areas for O3 or PM. On balance, EPA finds that the rule
strengthens the existing SIP in Indiana and as such, deems the
submittal approvable.

III. What action is EPA taking today?

    EPA is approving a November 14, 2011, request by Indiana to revise
the SIP to update 326 IAC 4-1, Open Burning Rule, because reducing open
burning will reduce PM, volatile organic compounds, and other
pollutants. EPA is approving this rule for attainment counties and is
taking no action on the rule for Clark, Floyd, Lake and Porter counties
which are nonattainment or maintenance areas for O3 or PM.
We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we view
this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the state plan if relevant adverse
written comments are filed. This rule will be effective November 17,
2014 without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written
comments by October 17, 2014. If we receive such comments, we will
withdraw this action before the effective date by publishing a
subsequent document that will withdraw the final action. All public
comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed action. The EPA will not institute a second
comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment. If we do not receive any comments, this action will be
effective November 17, 2014.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 17, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed
rules section of this Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Emissions
Reporting, Incorporation by reference, Ozone, Volatile organic
compounds.

    Dated: September 2, 2014.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  52.770, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entries under the subheading entitled ``Article 4. Burning
Regulations'' and by adding footnote 1 to the end of the table to read
as follows:

Sec.  52.770  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                     EPA[hyphen]Approved Indiana Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Indiana
         Indiana citation                 Subject          effective     EPA approval date          Notes
                                                             date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         Article 4. Burning Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Rule 1. Open Burning \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4-1-0.5..........................  Definitions.........    02/10/2001  09/17/2014, [insert   ...................
                                                                        Federal Register
                                                                        citation].
4-1-1............................  Scope...............    02/10/2001  09/17/2014, [insert   ...................
                                                                        Federal Register
                                                                        citation].
4-1-2............................  Prohibition against     02/10/2001  09/17/2014, [insert   ...................
                                    open burning.                       Federal Register
                                                                        citation].
4-1-3............................  Exemptions..........    10/28/2011  09/17/2014, [insert   ...................
                                                                        Federal Register
                                                                        citation].
4-1-4............................  Emergency burning...    10/28/2011  09/17/2014, [insert   ...................
                                                                        Federal Register
                                                                        citation].
4-1-4.1..........................  Open burning            12/15/2002  09/17/2014, [insert   ...................
                                    approval; criteria                  Federal Register
                                    and conditions.                     citation].
4-1-4.2..........................  Open burning;           02/10/2001  09/17/2014, [insert   ...................
                                    approval revocation.                Federal Register
                                                                        citation].
4-1-4.3..........................  Open burning            02/10/2001  09/17/2014, [insert   ...................
                                    approval;                           Federal Register
                                    delegation of                       citation].
                                    authority.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Rule 2. Incinerators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4-2-1............................  Applicability.......    12/15/2002  11/30/2004, 69 FR     ...................
                                                                        69531.
4-2-2............................  Incinerators........    12/15/2002  11/30/2004, 69 FR     ...................
                                                                        69531.
4-2-3............................  Portable                12/15/2002  11/30/2004, 69 FR     ...................
                                    incinerators                        69531.
                                    (Repealed).

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA is approving Rule 1 for the counties of Adams, Allen, Bartholomew, Benton, Blackford, Boone, Brown,
  Carroll, Cass, Clay, Clinton, Crawford, Daviess Dearborn, Decatur, De Kalb, Delaware, Dubois, Elkhart,
  Fayette, Fountain, Franklin, Fulton, Gibson, Grant, Greene, Hamilton, Hancock, Harrison, Hendricks, Henry,
  Howard, Huntington, Jackson, Jasper, Jay, Jefferson, Jennings, Johnson, Knox, Kosciusko, La Porte, Lagrange,
  Lawrence, Madison, Marion, Marshall, Martin, Miami, Monroe, Montgomery, Morgan, Newton, Noble, Ohio, Orange,
  Owen, Parke, Perry, Pike, Posey, Pulaski, Putnam, Randolph, Ripley, Rush, St. Joseph, Scott, Shelby, Spencer,
  Starke, Steuben, Sullivan, Switzerland, Tippecanoe, Tipton, Union, Vanderburgh, Vermillion, Vigo, Wabash,
  Warren, Warrick, Washington, Wayne, Wells, White, and Whitley.

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-22049 Filed 9-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: October 24, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 207)]
[Notices]
[Page 63468]
[DOCID:fr24oc08-63]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER96-1947-022; ER07-1001-001; ER07-1000-001; ER02-1052-
008]

LS Power Marketing, LLC; Sugar Creek Power Company; Las Vegas
Power Company, LLC; West Georgia Generating Company, LLC; Errata Notice

October 17, 2008.
    On July 2, 2008, the Commission issued a notice in docket numbers
ER96-1947-022, ER07-1001-001, ER02-1052-008, and ER07-1100-001.
Combined Notice of Filings # 1, July 2, 2008. Docket number ER07-1100-
001 and applicant Entergy Services, Inc. were inadvertently included in
this proceeding. This errata notice corrects the docket numbers and
applicants in this proceeding as reflected in the caption above.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-25340 Filed 10-23-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27952-27954]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11752]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0448; Directorate Identifier 2007-SW-51-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Model EC 120B
Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
specified Eurocopter France Model EC 120B helicopters. This proposed AD
would require modifying the pilot cyclic control friction device by
replacing a certain thrust washer with two thrust washers. This
proposed AD is prompted by an incident in which the pilot encountered a
sudden restriction of the cyclic control movement during flight. The
actions specified by this proposed AD are intended to prevent jamming
of a pilot cyclic control stick and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 12, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    You may get the service information identified in this proposed AD
from American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 Forum Drive, Grand Prairie,
Texas 75053-4005, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    You may examine the comments to this proposed AD in the AD docket
on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Roach, Aviation Safety Engineer,
Regulations and Policy Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax (817)
222-5961.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to submit any written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to the address listed
under the caption ADDRESSES. Include the docket number ``FAA-2011-0448,
Directorate Identifier 2007-SW-51-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each

substantive verbal contact with FAA personnel concerning this proposed
rulemaking. Using the search function of the docket Web site, you can
find and read the comments to any of our dockets, including the name of
the individual who sent or signed the comment. You may review the DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

Examining the Docket

    You may examine the docket that contains the proposed AD, any
comments, and other information in person at the Docket Operations
office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
located in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the West Building at the
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

Discussion

    The Direction Generale de l'Aviation Civile France (DGAC), which is
the aviation authority for France, has issued French AD No. F-2005-175,
dated October 26, 2005, on behalf of the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA), the Airworthiness Authority of the State of Design for
the affected helicopters, to correct an unsafe condition for the
Eurocopter France Model EC 120B helicopters.

Related Service Information

    Eurocopter has issued Alert Service Bulletin No. 67A011, Revision
1, dated October 7, 2005 (ASB), which specifies a modification to
preclude the risk that the pilot cyclic control stick will jam. The
modification consists of replacing the existing single-piece thrust
washer, part number (P/N) C671A1006201, with two thrust washers, P/N
C671A1018201 and P/N C671A1019201. The DGAC classified this alert
service bulletin as mandatory and issued AD No. F-2005-175, dated
October 26, 2005, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these
helicopters.

FAA's Evaluation and Unsafe Condition Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of France
and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with France, the DGAC, on behalf of the EASA, their
technical representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition
described in the DGAC AD. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated
all information provided by the DGAC and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of
the same type design. This proposed AD would require replacing a
single-piece thrust washer, P/N C671A1006201, with two thrust washers,
P/N C671A1018201 and P/N C671A1019201, to prevent the jamming of the
pilot cyclic control stick.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the DGAC AD

    The DGAC AD requires compliance with the ASB no later than December
31, 2005. Our proposed AD would require compliance within 30 days after
the effective date of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 114 helicopters of
U.S. registry and the proposed actions would take approximately 3 work
hours per helicopter to accomplish at an average labor rate of $85 per
work hour. Required parts would cost approximately $50 per helicopter.
Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost impact of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators would be $34,770 for the entire fleet, or
$305 per helicopter, to replace the single thrust washer with two
thrust washers.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. Additionally, this proposed
AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this proposed AD. See the AD docket to examine the economic
evaluation.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
to read as follows:

Eurocopter France: Docket No. FAA-2011-0448; Directorate Identifier
2007-SW-51-AD.

    Applicability: Model EC 120B helicopters, serial numbers up to
and including 1385, with a thrust washer, part number (P/N)
C671A1006201, installed on the pilot cyclic control stick friction
device; and a pilot cyclic stick, P/N C671A1007101, P/N
C671A1007102, or C671A1003102, installed, certificated in any
category.
    Compliance: Required within 30 days, unless accomplished
previously.
    To prevent jamming of a pilot cyclic control stick and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter, accomplish the
following:
    (a) Remove the pilot cyclic control stick; replace the thrust
washer, P/N C671A1006201, with two thrust washers, P/N C671A1018201
and P/N C671A1019201; reinstall the pilot cyclic control stick; and
perform a functional test of the cyclic control.
    (b) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Contact the Manager, Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft
Directorate, FAA, ATTN: Gary Roach, Aviation Safety Engineer,
Regulations and Policy Group, ASW-111, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth,

Texas 76137, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, for
information about previously approved alternative methods of
compliance.
    (c) The Joint Aircraft System/Component (JASC) Code is 2700:
Flight Control System.

    Note:  The subject of this AD is addressed in Direction Generale
de l'Aviation Civile (France) AD No. F-2005-175, dated October 26,
2005, and Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin No. 67A011, Revision 1,
dated October 7, 2005

    .Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 27, 2011.
Scott A. Horn,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-11752 Filed 5-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8168-8170]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03262]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2015-0940]
RIN 1625-AA09

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Indian Creek, Miami Beach, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to modify the operating schedule that
governs the 63rd Street Bridge across Indian Creek, mile 4.0, at Miami
Beach, FL. This proposed rule implements restrictions that allow the
bridge to not open for vessels during peak vehicle traffic times.
Bridge openings during peak vehicle traffic times cause major traffic
jams that may be avoided without negatively impacting vessel traffic on
the Indian Creek. Modifying the bridge operating schedule will reduce
major vehicle traffic issues during rush hour times.

DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before April 18, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2015-0940 using Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Rod Elkins with the Coast Guard; telephone 305-
415-6989, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis

    On March 11th, 2015 the Miami Beach City Commission held a public
meeting to discuss appropriate action for modifying the bridge
operations. Additionally, the City conducted traffic studies and
reviewed the bridge logs which showed a 45% increase in vehicular
traffic from 7 a.m. to 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. with no
corresponding increase in vessel traffic during those time periods.
Input from the public meeting and the traffic data was used to develop
the proposed rule. That data will be included in the electronic docket
for this proposed rulemaking.
    63rd Street Bridge across Indian Creek, mile 4.0, at Miami Beach,
FL is a single leaf bascule bridge. It has a vertical clearance of 11
feet at mean high water in the closed position and a horizontal
clearance of 50 feet.
    Presently, in accordance with 33 CFR 117.5, the 63rd Street Bridge
is required to open on signal for the passage of vessels. The City of
Miami Beach and Miami Dade County determined that restricting bridge
openings during peak traffic hours will significantly reduce traffic
congestion. Based on this determination, the City of Miami Beach
requested this action to alleviate additional traffic congestion
created by bridge openings during peak hours.
    In addition to proposing a schedule that will allow for limited
openings during the regular work week, the Coast Guard is proposing a
regulation change that will apply during the annual boat show. Every
year in mid-February the City of Miami Beach hosts the Yacht and
Brokerage Show which creates unusually high vehicle and vessel traffic
during the weeks before and after the show. The Coast Guard typically
issues temporary deviations to the 63rd Street Bridge operations that
help balance vessel and vehicle needs during those times. The Coast
Guard proposes adopting the annual temporary deviation as part of this
bridge regulation.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to add a new regulation for the operations
of the 63rd Street Bridge, Indian Creek mile 4.0, at Miami Beach. The
proposed regulation would implement three closure periods, which would
allow the bridge to not open for vessels during morning and afternoon
peak vehicle traffic times. The following schedule is proposed: (1)
From Monday through Friday from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. the bridge would only
open on the hour and half hour; (2) from 7:10 a.m. to 9:55 a.m. and
4:05 p.m. to 6:59 p.m. Monday through Friday, the bridge would remain
closed; and (3) from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. the seven days before and the
four days following the City of Miami Beach Yacht and Brokerage Show
the second week of February, the bridge would only open for ten minutes
at the top of the hour. For federal holidays, weekends, and other times
the bridge would continue to open for vessels on signal.
    These proposed changes will still allow vessels to pass through the
bridge while taking into account the reasonable needs of other modes of
transportation.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize
our analyses based on these statutes and E.O.s and we also discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not
been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the limited impact
that it is anticipated to have on vessel traffic on the Indian Creek
while taking into account the needs of vehicular traffic. Vessels that
can transit under the bridge without an opening may do so. Other
vessels can transit during non closure period times, and emergency
vessels and tugs with tows can still request openings at any time.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the bridge may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above this proposed rule would not have
a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for

compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review,
under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
    Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
    Documents mentioned in this notice, and all public comments, are in
our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by
following that Web site's instructions. Additionally, if you go to the
online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will be notified when
comments are posted or a final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  117.293 to read as follows:

Sec.  117.293  Indian Creek.

    The draw of the 63rd Street Bridge, Indian Creek mile 4.0, at Miami
Beach, shall open on signal except as follows:
    (a) From 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Friday except Federal
holidays, the draw need open only on the hour and half-hour.
    (b) From 7:10 a.m. to 9:55 a.m. and 4:05 p.m. to 6:59 p.m., Monday
through Friday except Federal holidays, the draw need not open for the
passage of vessels.
    (c) In February of each year during the period seven days prior to
the City of Miami Beach Yacht and Brokerage Show and the four days
following the show, from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., the bridge need not
open except for 10 minutes at the top of the hour. At all other times
the bridge shall operate on its normal schedule.

    Dated: February 11, 2016.
S.A. Buschman,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2016-03262 Filed 2-17-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: January 16, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 11)]
[Notices]
[Page 2917-2918]
[DOCID:fr16ja08-53]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2002-0302; FRL-8347-6]

Dichlorvos (DDVP); Notice of Receipt of Request to Voluntarily
Cancel Certain Pesticide Registrations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 6(f)(1) of the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended, EPA is issuing a
notice of receipt of request by registrants to voluntarily cancel
certain pesticide registrations containing dichlorvos (DDVP).

DATES: Unless a request is withdrawn by February 15, 2008, orders will
be issued canceling these registrations. The Agency will consider
withdrawal requests postmarked no later than February 15, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments and your withdrawal request, identified
by docket identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2002-0302, by one of
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7508P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2002-0302. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available in regulations.gov. To access the electronic docket, go to
http://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced Search,'' then ``Docket

Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where indicated and select the
``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on the regulations.gov
website to view the docket index or access available documents.
Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov
, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of operation of this
Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703)
305-5805.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Bartow, Special Review and
Reregistration Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. Although this
action may be of particular interest to persons who produce or use
pesticides, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the information in this notice, consult the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1.  Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2.  Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
     ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.

    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    This notice announces receipt by the Agency of applications from
Sergeant's Pet Care Products, Inc. (Sergeant's) to cancel two pesticide
products registered under section 3 or 24(c) of FIFRA. These
registrations are listed in sequence by registration number in Table 1
of this unit:

     Table 1.--Registrations with Pending Requests for Cancellation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Registration No.            Product Name        Chemical Name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2517-37                         Sergeant's Sentry  Dichlorvos (DDVP)
                                 Collar for Dogs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2517-38                         Sergeant's Sentry  Dichlorvos (DDVP)
                                 Collar for Cats
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Unless a request is withdrawn by the registrant within 30 days of
publication of this notice, orders will be issued canceling all of
these registrations. Users of these pesticides or anyone else desiring
the retention of a registration should contact the applicable
registrant directly during this 30-day period.
    Table 2 of this unit includes the name and address of record for
the registrant of the products in Table 1 of this unit.

         Table 2.--Registrants Requesting Voluntary Cancellation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            EPA Company No.                  Company Name and Address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2517                                     Sergeant's Pet Care Products,
                                          Inc.
                                         509 Tower Valley Drive
                                         Hillsboro, Missouri 63050
------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?

    Section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA provides that a registrant of a pesticide
product may at any time request that any of its pesticide registrations
be canceled. FIFRA further provides that, before acting on the request,
EPA must publish a notice of receipt of any such request in the Federal
Register. Thereafter, the Administrator may approve such a request.

IV. Procedures for Withdrawal of Request

    Registrants who choose to withdraw a request for cancellation must
submit such withdrawal in writing to the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, postmarked before February 15, 2008. This
written withdrawal of the request for cancellation will apply only to
the applicable FIFRA section 6(f)(1) request listed in this notice. If
the product(s) have been subject to a previous cancellation action, the
effective date of cancellation and all other provisions of any earlier
cancellation action are controlling. The withdrawal request must also
include a commitment to pay any reregistration fees due, and to fulfill
any applicable unsatisfied data requirements.

V. Provisions for Disposition of Existing Stocks

    The effective date of cancellation will be the date of the
cancellation order. The orders effecting these requested cancellations
will generally permit a registrant to sell or distribute existing
stocks for 1 year after the date the cancellation request was received.
This policy is in accordance with the Agency's statement of policy as
prescribed in the Federal Register of June 26, 1991 (56 FR 29362) (FRL-
3846-4). Exceptions to this general rule will be made if a product
poses a risk concern, or is in noncompliance with reregistration
requirements, or is subject to a data call-in. In all cases, product-
specific disposition dates will be given in the cancellation orders.
    Existing stocks are those stocks of registered pesticide products
which are currently in the United States and which have been packaged,
labeled, and released for shipment prior to the effective date of the
cancellation action. Unless the provisions of an earlier order apply,
existing stocks already in the hands of dealers or users can be
distributed, sold, or used legally until they are exhausted, provided
that such further sale and use comply with the EPA-approved label and
labeling of the affected product. Exception to these general rules will
be made in specific cases when more stringent restrictions on sale,
distribution, or use of the products or their ingredients have already
been imposed, as in a special review action, or where the Agency has
identified significant potential risk concerns associated with a
particular chemical.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: January 4, 2008.
Steven Bradbury,
Director, Special Review and Reregistration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E8-539 Filed 1-15-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 243 (Monday, December 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78708-78710]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32344]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-65939; File No. SR-CBOE-2011-119]

 Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Related to a Complex Order Auction Feature

December 12, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on December 6, 2011, the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by
the Exchange. The Exchange has designated the proposal as a ``non-
controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of
the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\

The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to amend its electronic complex order
rules. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.org/Legal), at the Exchange's
Office of the Secretary and at the Commission.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    On a class-by-class basis, the Exchange may determine to activate
the electronic complex order RFR auction (``COA''), which is a process
by which eligible complex orders \5\ are given an opportunity for price
improvement before being booked in the electronic complex order book
(``COB'') or once on a PAR workstation. Paragraph (d) of Rule 6.53C
describes the COA process. Interpretation and Policy .04 of the Rule
also provides that, with respect to the initiation of a COA, Trading
Permit Holders routing complex orders directly to COB may request that
the complex orders be COA'd on a class-by-class basis and Trading
Permit Holders with resting complex orders on PAR may request that
complex orders be COA'd on an order-by-order basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ An eligible complex order, referred to in Rule 6.53C as a
``COA-eligible order,'' means a complex order that, as determined by
the Exchange on a class-by-class basis, is eligible for a COA
considering the order's marketability (defined as a number of ticks
away from the current market), size, complex order type and complex
order origin type (i.e., non-broker-dealer public customer, broker-
dealers that are not Market-Makers or specialists on an options
exchange, and/or Market-Makers or specialists on an options
exchange). All determinations by the Exchange on COA-eligible order
parameters are announced to Trading Permit Holders by Regulatory
Circular. See Rule 6.53C(d)(i)(2) and Interpretation and Policy .01
to Rule 6.53C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is proposing to amend the rule to describe a COA
feature for complex orders resting in COB (referred to herein as the
``re-COA'' feature), which is currently in use but not expressly
covered in the rules. In particular, the Exchange is proposing to
provide that, for each class where COA is activated, the Exchange may
also determine to activate the re-COA feature for complex orders
resting in COB. For such classes, any non-marketable order resting at
the top of the COB (regardless of whether it was subject to COA before
it was booked in COB) \6\ will be automatically subject to the re-COA
feature if the order is within a number of ticks away from the current
market (calculated based on the derived net price of the individual
series legs). The Exchange notes that this re-COA feature for resting
orders is only applicable to resting non-marketable orders that move
close to the current market price calculated based on the individual
series legs. This feature is not applicable to resting orders that
become marketable. The Exchange may also determine on a class-by-class
and strategy basis to limit the frequency of re-COA auctions initiated
for complex orders resting in COB. For example, the Exchange might
determine to limit the frequency of re-COA auctions to once every ``X''
seconds (the ``interval timer'') for a total of ``Y'' intervals. Once
this cycle is complete, the Exchange may determine to wait for a period
of time ``Z'' (the ``sleep timer'') and then reactivate the re-COA
feature.\7\ All timers will be reset if a new complex order improves
the top of the COB (i.e., improves the best net price bid or offer of
the complex orders resting in COB). These limitations on the frequency
of COA auctions due to the re-COA feature are intended to address
system efficiency and effectiveness considerations, such as limiting
repeated initiations of COA auctions (and related messaging) when there
are flickering quotes. Once the re-COA feature is initiated for a
resting order, all other aspects of the COA process described in Rule
6.53C will apply unchanged. The Exchange believes this re-COA feature
facilitates the orderly execution of complex orders by providing an
automated opportunity for price improvement to (and execution of)
resting orders priced near the current market, similar to what a
Trading Permit Holder might seek to do if the Trading Permit Holder
were representing a complex order in open outcry (or just entering an
order initially into COB).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ In this regard, the Exchange notes that, currently, all of
its Trading Permit Holders have elected to have their COA-eligible
orders COA'd. In addition, the Exchange notes that other markets
have programs in place that provide for the automatic auctioning of
complex orders. See, e.g., NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'') Rule
1080(e)(i)(A) which, among other things, provides that a complex
order live auction (``COLA'') will initiate if the Phlx system
receives a complex order that improves the Phlx complex order best
debit or credit price respecting the specific complex order strategy
that is the subject of the complex order. During a COLA, Phlx market
participants may bid and offer against the COLA-eligible order
pursuant to the Phlx Rule.
    \7\ Determinations by the Exchange regarding the classes where
the re-COA feature is activated and related tick distance and
frequency parameters will be announced to Trading Permit Holders via
Regulatory Circular.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following example illustrates the operation of this re-COA
feature: Assume the feature is activated for complex orders resting in
COB that are within 2 ticks of the current market ($0.02 in a class
where complex orders trade in $0.01 net price increments). Assume the
frequency is limited to once every 15 seconds (the interval timer) for
1 interval. Under this setting, a total of 2 re-COA auctions could be
triggered-the original re-COA auction and a second re-COA auction after
the expiration of the 15-second interval timer. Assume the sleep timer
is set at 60 minutes. Assume the current market calculated based on the
derived net price of the individual series legs in the CBOE electronic
book for a given strategy is at a net price of $0.80-$1.01. If a
complex order resting in the COB to buy the strategy is priced at a net
debit price of $0.98, the complex order is not marketable (as the order
is away from the current market by $0.03 (or 3 ticks)). If subsequently
the individual series legs prices are updated such that the current
market for the strategy moves to a net price of $0.80-$1.00, the
resting complex order to buy at $0.98 would trigger the re-COA feature
and initiate the re-COA auction process (as the order is within $0.02
(or 2 ticks) of the current market). If there are no responses, the
order would be placed back in COB. The resting order would not initiate
the re-COA feature again until the 15-second interval timer has
expired. When the 15-second interval timer expires, the order would be
eligible to initiate the re-COA feature again if the current market
moves after the expiration of the timer and the order meets the tick
distance parameter (the order would not automatically initiate the re-
COA feature after the expiration of the interval timer; instead there
must be an update to the current market after the expiration of the
interval timer and the order must meet the tick distance

parameter for the system to re-COA again). For example, if after the
end of the 15-second interval timer the current market moves to $0.80-
$0.99 (or, for example, if the current market moves back to $0.80-$1.01
and then, after the end of the 15-second interval timer moves back
again to $0.80-$1.00), then the resting complex order would again
initiate the re-COA feature. If there are no responses, the order would
be placed back in COB. The cycle is complete. Now that the resting
order has been subject to COA 2 times since it was booked in COB, the
60 minute sleep timer will begin and the resting order will not be
eligible for the re-COA feature again until the sleep timer expires and
there is a quote update after that timer expires that is within the
tick distance parameter. All timers would be reset anytime there is a
price change at the top of the COB. For example, if five minutes into
the sleep interval a second complex order is entered to rest in COB at
a price of $0.99 ($0.01 better than the original resting order priced
at $0.98), the original resting order would no longer be at the top of
the COB and subject to the re-COA feature. The timers would reset and
the second complex order (which now represents the top of the COB)
would be subject to the re-COA process. If, for example, the second
order subsequently trades (constituting a price change at the top of
the COB), the original order would be at the top of the COB again and
could become subject to the re-COA feature again.
2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act
\8\ in general and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act \9\ in particular in that it should promote just and equitable
principles of trade, serve to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and
protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change facilitates the orderly execution of complex
orders by providing an automated opportunity for price improvement to
(and execution of) resting orders priced near the current market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposal.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing rule does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, provided that the self-regulatory organization
has given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or such shorter time as designated
by the Commission, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\11 \ At any time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2011-119 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2011-119. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received
will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2011-119 and
should be submitted on or before January 9, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-32344 Filed 12-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86326]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27337]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 15334-000]

SV Hydro LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application Accepted
for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing
Applications

    On November 16, 2023, SV Hydro LLC., filed an application for a
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act
(FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of a hydropower project to be
located at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (Corps) Coffeeville Lock
and Dam near the Town of Coffeeville, Choctaw, and Clarke Counties,
Alabama. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to
grant the permit holder priority to file a license application during
the permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the permit
holder to perform any land-disturbing activities or otherwise enter
upon lands or waters owned by others without the owners' express
permission.
    The proposed Coffeeville Hydroelectric Project would consist of the
following: (1) a 200-foot-long, 100-foot-wide intake channel; (2) a 90-
foot-long, 120-foot-wide, 50-foot-high concrete powerhouse located on
the northwest bank of the river at the left abutment (looking
downstream) of the existing Corps' dam containing four Kaplan bulb
turbine-generator units with a total capacity of 36.0 megawatts; (3) a
250-foot-long, 100-foot-wide tailrace; (4) a switchyard, adjacent to
the powerhouse; and (5) a 2.7-mile-long, 69 kilovolt transmission line.
The proposed project would have an estimated annual generation of 180
megawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Douglas Spaulding, Nelson Energy, 1030 Tyrol
Trail, Suite 101, Minneapolis, MN 55416; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Michael Spencer; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email
at [email protected].
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners,
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is
encouraged to contact OPP at<PHONE_NUMBER> or [email protected].
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications using the Commission's eFiling system at https://ferconline.ferc.gov/eFiling.aspx. Commenters can submit brief comments
up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the eComment
system at https://ferconline.ferc.gov/QuickComment.aspx. You must
include your name and contact information at the end of your comments.
For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
[email protected],<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, you may submit a paper copy.
Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service must be addressed to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426. Submissions sent via
any other carrier must be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville,
Maryland 20852. The first page of any filing should include docket
number P-15334-000.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the
Commission's website at https://elibrary.ferc.gov/eLibrary/search.
Enter the docket number (P-15334) in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: December 7, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-27337 Filed 12-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 105 (Monday, June 1, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33020-33021]
[FR Doc No: 2020-10016]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 240

[Release No. 34-87005A; File No. S7-05-14]
RIN 3235-AL45

Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for Security-Based Swap
Dealers, Major Security-Based Swap Participants, and Broker-Dealers;
Correction

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 16, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission
revised Commission rules. That document inadvertently listed an
incorrect subordinate paragraph in a cross-reference to a rule. This
document corrects the final regulations.

DATES: Effective on June 1, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sheila Dombal Swartz, Senior Special
Counsel, at<PHONE_NUMBER>; Division of Trading and Markets, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-7010.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission is making a correcting
amendment to 17 CFR 240.18a-6 (Rule 18a-6) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act''), published on December 16, 2019
[84 FR 68550] and adopted in Exchange Act Release No. 87005 (September
19, 2019).

List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 240

    Brokers, Confidential business information, Fraud, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Securities.

    Accordingly, 17 CFR part 240 is corrected by making the following
correcting amendments:

PART 240--GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS, SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934

0
1. The general authority citation for part 240 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77c, 77d, 77g, 77j, 77s, 77z-2, 77z-3,
77eee, 77ggg, 77nnn, 77sss, 77ttt, 78c, 78c-3, 78c-5, 78d, 78e, 78f,

78g, 78i, 78j, 78j-1, 78k, 78k-1, 78l, 78m, 78n, 78n-1, 78o, 78o-4,
78o-10, 78p, 78q, 78q-1, 78s, 78u-5, 78w, 78x, 78dd, 78ll, 78mm,
80a-20, 80a-23, 80a-29, 80a-37, 80b- 3, 80b-4, 80b-11, and 7201 et
seq., and 8302; 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E); 12 U.S.C. 5221(e)(3); 18 U.S.C.
1350; Pub. L. 111-203, 939A, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010); and Pub. L. 112-
106, sec. 503 and 602, 126 Stat. 326 (2012), unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *

0
2. In Sec.  240.18a-6, revise paragraph (b)(1)(x) to read as follows:

Sec.  240.18a-6  Records to be preserved by certain security-based swap
dealers and major security-based swap participants.

* * * * *
    (b)(1) * * *
    (x) The records required to be made pursuant to Sec.  240.18a-
1(e)(2)(iii)(F)(1) and (2).
* * * * *

    Dated: May 6, 2020.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-10016 Filed 5-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P