[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30930-30931]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13152]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC11-512-000]

Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-512); Comment
Request; Extension

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of proposed information collection and request for
comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of section 3506(c)(2)(a)
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13), the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the information collection described below.

DATES: Comments in consideration of the collection of information are
due July 26, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be filed either electronically (eFiled) or in
paper format, and should refer to Docket No. IC11-512-000. Documents
must be prepared in an acceptable filing format and in compliance with
Commission submission guidelines at: http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp. eFiling instructions are available at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. First time users must follow
eRegister instructions at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/eregistration.asp, to establish a username and password before eFiling.
The Commission will send an automatic acknowledgement to the sender's
e-mail address upon receipt of eFiled comments. Commenters making an
eFiling should not make a paper filing. Commenters that are not able to
file electronically must send an original of their comments to: Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    Users interested in receiving automatic notification of activity in
this docket may do so through eSubscription at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp. In addition, all comments and FERC
issuances may be viewed, printed or downloaded remotely through FERC's
eLibrary at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp, by searching
on Docket No. IC11-512. For user assistance, contact FERC Online
Support by e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by phone at: (866)
208-3676 (toll-free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> for TTY.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by e-mail
at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, and fax at
(202) 273-0873.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information collected under the
requirements of FERC-512, ``Application for Preliminary Permit'' (OMB
No. 1902-0073), is used by the Commission to implement the statutory
provisions of Sections 4(f), 5 and 7 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16
U.S.C. Sections 797, 798 & 800. The purpose of obtaining a preliminary
permit is to maintain priority of the application for a license for a
hydropower facility while the applicant conducts surveys to prepare
maps, plans, specifications and estimates; conducts engineering,
economic and environmental feasibility studies; and making financial
arrangements. The conditions under which the priority will be
maintained are set forth in each permit. During the term of the permit,
no other application for a preliminary permit or application for a
license submitted by another party can be accepted. The term of the
permit is three years. The information collected under the designation
FERC-512 is in the form of a written application for a preliminary
permit which is used by Commission staff to determine an applicant's
qualifications to hold a preliminary permit, review the proposed hydro
development for feasibility and to issue a notice of the application in
order to solicit public and agency comments. The Commission implements
these mandatory filing requirements in the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) under 18 CFR 4.31-.33, 4.81-.83.
    Action: The Commission is requesting a three-year extension of the
current expiration date, with no changes to the existing collection of
data.
    Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this collection is
estimated as:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Number of        Number of      Average burden
               Data collection                  respondents     responses per      hours per       Total annual
                                                  annually        respondent        response       burden hours
                                                         (1)              (2)              (3)   (1) x (2) x (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FERC-512....................................             200                1               37            7,400
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated cost burden to respondents is $508,000; [i.e., (7 hours
@$200 an hour (legal) x 200) + (30 hours @$38 an hour (technical) x
200)] per year equals $508,000). The average annual cost burden per
respondent is $2,540.
    The reporting burden includes the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide the information including: (1) Reviewing instructions; (2)
developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems
for the purposes of collecting, validating, verifying, processing,
maintaining, disclosing and providing information; (3) adjusting the
existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and
requirements; (4) training personnel to respond to a collection of
information; (5) searching data sources; (6) completing and reviewing
the collection of information; and (7) transmitting, or otherwise
disclosing the information.
    The estimate of cost for respondents is based upon salaries for
professional and clerical support, as well as direct and indirect
overhead costs. Direct costs include all costs directly attributable to
providing this information, such as administrative costs and the cost
for information technology. Indirect or overhead costs are costs
incurred by an organization in support of its mission. These costs
apply to activities which benefit the whole organization rather than
anyone particular function or activity.
    Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

    Dated: May 20, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-13152 Filed 5-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 236 (Thursday, December 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 76810]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31459]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Public Notice for Waiver of Aeronautical Land-Use Assurance;
Austin Straubel International Airport, Green Bay, WI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent of waiver with respect to land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering a
proposal to authorize the release of 3.3334 acres of airport property
at the Austin Straubel International Airport, Green Bay, WI.
    Brown County, as sponsor of the airport, is seeking to release from
compliance with grant assurances two parcels of airport property
identified as Parcel nos. 98 and 107, totaling 3.3334 acres. These
parcels are located alongside each other in the extreme northwest
corner of the airport in the vicinity of the intersection of Pine Tree
Road and State Highway 172. Proposed use of the land to be released is
construction of a new fire station by the neighboring Village of Hobart
to house its emergency response vehicles. The proposed fire station
would be located adjacent to the existing village hall.
    The 3.334 acres would be provided to the Village of Hobart in
exchange for the village vacating 2 parcels of road and road right-of-
way totaling 9.367 acres located on, or adjacent to, Austin Straubel
International Airport. One parcel contains a roadway section located
within the airport security perimeter fence on West Adam Drive and
Lonesome Road. The second parcel is a short section of Cyrus Road,
located immediately to the south of Runway 36 and within the runway
protection zone, but outside of the airport property boundary.
    The value to the airport of exchanging airport property for the
road and road right-of-way rests with the fact that the Village of
Hobart could otherwise mandate the airport to keep the surfaces open
and require installation of a fence around the road right-of-ways at an
estimated cost to the airport of over $200,000. An additional benefit
to the airport of acquiring this 9.367 acres of village-owned property
in exchange for the 3.3334 acres of airport-owned property is that this
action would provide the airport with a contiguous, airside property
boundary.
    A categorical exclusion for this land release action was prepared
by Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation-Bureau of Aeronautics, and issued
by FAA on November 15, 2011.
    The airport sponsor purchased the two parcels by voluntary
acquisition on June 24, 1998 (Parcel No. 98) and November 1, 2002
(Parcel No. 107). No Federal or State of Wisconsin funds were utilized
in the acquisition process.
    The aforementioned land is not needed for aeronautical use, as
shown on the Airport Layout Plan, conditionally approved on May 16,
2011. There are no impacts to the airport by allowing the airport to
dispose of the property.
    In accordance with section 47107(h) of title 49, United States
Code, this notice is required to be published in the Federal Register
30 days before modifying the land-use assurance that requires the
property to be used for an aeronautical purpose.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 9, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Mr. Daniel J. Millenacker, Program Manager, Federal Aviation
Administration, Airports District Office, 6020 28th Avenue South, Room
102, Minneapolis, MN 55450-2706. Telephone Number<PHONE_NUMBER>/FAX
Number<PHONE_NUMBER>. Documents reflecting this FAA action may be
reviewed at the following locations: Federal Aviation Administration,
Minneapolis Airports District Office, 6020 28th Avenue South, Room 102,
Minneapolis, MN 55450-2706, or at the Wisconsin Department of
Transportation, Bureau of Aeronautics, 4802 Sheboygan Ave., Room 701,
Madison WI 53707.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Daniel J. Millenacker, Program
Manager, Federal Aviation Administration, Airports District Office,
6020 28th Avenue South, Room 102, Minneapolis, MN 55450-2706. Telephone
Number<PHONE_NUMBER>/FAX Number<PHONE_NUMBER>. Documents reflecting
this FAA action may be reviewed at the following locations: Federal
Aviation Administration, Minneapolis Airports District Office, 6020
28th Avenue South, Room 102, Minneapolis, MN 55450-2706; or at the
Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Bureau of Aeronautics, 4802
Sheboygan Ave., Room 701, Madison WI 53707.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Following is a legal description of the
subject airport property to be released at Austin Straubel
International Airport, Green Bay, Wisconsin:
    Parcel No. 98: West 220 feet of N\1/4\ of SW\1/4\, NW\1/4\. Section
1, T23N, R19E, except highway, Village of Hobart, Brown County,
Wisconsin.
    Parcel No. 107: West 440 feet of North\1/2\ of North\1/2\, SW\1/4\,
NW\1/4\, except West 220 feet and except road, Section 1, Township 23
N, R19E, Village of Hobart, Brown County, Wisconsin.
    Said parcel subject to all easements, restrictions, and
reservations of record.

    Issued in Minneapolis, MN on November 17, 2011.
Laurie Suttmeier,
Acting Manager, Minneapolis Airports District Office, FAA, Great Lakes
Region.
[FR Doc. 2011-31459 Filed 12-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47490-47491]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17190]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0005; Notice 1]

Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming
Model Year 1995 Lamborghini Diablo SE30 Passenger Cars Are Eligible for
Importation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Receipt of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces receipt by the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that
model year (MY) 1994 and 1995 Lamborghini Diablo SE30 passenger cars
(PC) that were not originally manufactured to comply with all
applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS), are eligible
for importation into the United States because they are substantially
similar to vehicles that were originally manufactured for sale in the
United States and that were certified by their manufacturer as
complying with the safety standards (the U.S.-certified version of the
MY 1994 and 1995 Lamborghini Diablo SE30 PC) and they are capable of
being readily altered to conform to the standards.

DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is August 22,
2016.

ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Comments must be written in the English language, and
be no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to
the length of necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are
submitted in hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive confirmation that your comments were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
    How to Read Comments submitted to the Docket: You may read the
comments received by Docket Management at the address and times given
above. You may also view the documents from the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets. The docket ID number and title of this notice are shown at the
heading of this document notice. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue to file relevant information in
the Docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit
late comments. Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically search
the Docket for new material.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Stevens, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA<PHONE_NUMBER>).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not
originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS shall be
refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that
the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle
originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United
States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS.
    Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either
manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to
49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice
in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords
interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the
close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has

received, whether the vehicle is eligible for importation. The agency
then publishes this decision in the Federal Register.
    J.K. Technologies LLC (JK) of Baltimore, Maryland (Registered
Importer R-90-006) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether nonconforming
MY 1994 and 1995 Lamborghini Diablo SE30 PCs are eligible for
importation into the United States. The vehicles which JK believes are
substantially similar are MY 1994 and 1995 Lamborghini Diablo SE30 PCs
sold in the United States and certified by their manufacturer as
conforming to all applicable FMVSS.
    The petitioner claims that it compared non-U.S. certified MY 1994
and 1995 Lamborghini Diablo SE30 PCs to their U.S.-certified
counterparts, and found the vehicles to be substantially similar with
respect to compliance with most FMVSS.
    JK submitted information with its petition intended to demonstrate
that non-U.S. certified MY 1994 and 1995 Lamborghini Diablo SE30 PCs,
as originally manufactured, conform to many applicable FMVSS in the
same manner as their U.S.-certified counterparts, or are capable of
being readily altered to conform to those standards.
    Specifically, the petitioner claims that the non U.S.-certified MY
1994 and 1995 Lamborghini Diablo SE30 PCs, as originally manufactured,
conform to: Standard Nos. 102 Transmission Shift Lever Sequence,
Starter Interlock, and Transmission Braking Effect, 103 Windshield
Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and Washing
Systems, 105 Hydraulic and Electric Brake Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 109
New pneumatic and certain specialty tires, 113 Hood Latch System, 116
Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids, 124 Accelerator Control Systems, 202 Head
Restraints, 203 Impact protection for the driver from the steering
control system, 204 Steering Control Rearward Displacement, 205 Glazing
Materials, 206 Door Locks and door retention components, 207 Seating
Systems, 210 Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages, 212 Windshield Mounting,
214 Side Impact Protection, 216 Roof Crush Resistance, 219 Windshield
Zone Intrusion, and 302 Flammability of Interior Materials.
    The petitioner also contends that the subject non-U.S certified
vehicles are capable of being readily altered to meet the following
standards, in the manner indicated:
    Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: Replacement of the original
instrument cluster with the U.S. model component and reprogramming the
associated software as described in the petition.
    Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated
Equipment: Replacement of the front and rear side marker lamps,
headlamps, taillamps and stop lamps with U.S.-conforming components.
    Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims: Installation of the
required tire information placard.
    Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors: Inscription of the required
warning statement on the face of the passenger side rearview mirror or
replacement of the mirror with a U.S. model mirror.
    114 Theft protection: A U.S. model center console control system
will be added to activate the key warning and belt warning systems.
    118 Power-Operated Window, Partition, and Roof panel System: A U.
S. model center console control system will be added to activate the
key warning and belt warning systems.
    Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: Replacement of passive
restraint system, electrical wiring harness, passenger's side seat
belt, seatbelt tracks and electronic control unit (ECU) with U.S. model
components as described in the petition.
    Standard No. 209 Seat Belt Assemblies: Replacement of the passenger
seat belt assembly with U.S. model components.
    Standard No. 301 Fuel System Integrity: Replacement of fuel system
components with U.S. model components as necessary to meet all
applicable requirements of the standards.
    The petitioner additionally states that a vehicle identification
plate must be affixed to the vehicle near the left windshield pillar to
meet the requirements of 49 CFR part 565.
    All comments received before the close of business on the closing
date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for
examination in the docket at the above addresses both before and after
that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing
date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(B), and (b)(1); 49
CFR 593.7; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.

Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-17190 Filed 7-20-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P