[Federal Register: March 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 48)]
[Notices]
[Page 11878-11880]
[DOCID:fr12mr10-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[AMS-FRL-9126-5]

California State Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Standards;
Amendments to the California Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Regulation;
Waiver Request; Opportunity for Public Hearing

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of opportunity for public hearing and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has notified EPA
that it has adopted amendments to its regulations related to zero
emission vehicles (ZEVs) in California. By letter dated September 17,
2009, CARB requested that EPA confirm that its amendments as they
affect model years 2008-2011 are within-the-scope of previous waivers
of preemption issued by EPA. CARB also requests that EPA confirm that
amendments as they affect the 2012 and subsequent model years are also
within-the-scope of previous waivers of preemption issued by EPA; or,
in the alternative, that EPA grant a new waiver of preemption for these
future model years. This notice announces that EPA has tentatively
scheduled a public hearing concerning California's request and that EPA
is accepting written comment on the request.

DATES: EPA has tentatively scheduled a public hearing concerning CARB's
request on April 13, 2010 at 10 a.m. EPA will hold a hearing only if
any party notifies EPA by April 1, 2010, expressing its interest in
presenting oral testimony. By April 6, 2010, any person who plans to
attend the hearing may call David Dickinson at<PHONE_NUMBER> to learn
if a hearing will be held or may check the following Web site for an
update: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/cafr.htm.
    Parties wishing to present oral testimony at the public hearing
should also provide written notice to David Dickinson at the address
noted below. If EPA receives a request for a public hearing, that
hearing will be held at 1310 L St, NW., Washington, DC 20005.
    If EPA does not receive a request for a public hearing, then EPA
will not hold a hearing, and instead consider CARB's request based on
written submissions to the docket. Any party may submit written
comments by May 17, 2010.

ADDRESSES: EPA will make available for public inspection materials
submitted by CARB, written comments received from interested parties,
and any testimony given at the public hearing. Materials relevant to
this proceeding are contained in the Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, maintained in Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0780. The
docket is located at The Air Docket, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, and may be viewed between 8 a.m. and
5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. The telephone is<PHONE_NUMBER>. A
reasonable fee may be charged by EPA for copying docket material.
    Additionally, an electronic version of the public docket is
available through the Federal government's electronic public docket and
comment system. You may access EPA dockets at http://
www.regulations.gov. After opening the http://www.regulations.gov Web
site, enter EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0780 in ``Search Documents'' to view
documents in the record. Although a part of the official docket, the
public docket does not include Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Dickinson, Compliance and
Innovative Strategies Division (6405J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20460. Telephone:
(202) 343-9256, Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

(A) Procedural History

    Within CARB's 1990-1991 California Low Emission Vehicle (LEV I)
rulemaking, CARB required that ten percent of the passenger cars and
LDT1s \1\ marketed by all but small volume manufacturers were required
to be ZEVs starting in the 2003 model year. EPA granted California an
initial waiver of preemption for California's original 1990 ZEV
requirements in January 1993 as part of the LEV I waiver.\2\ CARB
amended its original ZEV requirements in 1996, and in January 2001, EPA

found that those amendments, which modified manufacturer ZEV production
mandates for model years 1998 through 2002, were within-the-scope of
the originally-granted waiver.\3\ CARB again amended its ZEV
requirements in 1999, 2001, and 2003, as they applied to 2007 and
earlier model year passenger cars and LDT1s; in December 2006, EPA
determined that those amendments fell within-the-scope of the 1993
waiver.\4\ Within the December 2006 decision, EPA also granted CARB a
new waiver for its 2007 through 2011 model year ZEV requirements. EPA
expressly made no finding as to the 2012 and later model years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Under CARB's regulations, an LDT1 is a light-duty truck
having a loaded weight of 0-3750 pounds.
    \2\ 58 FR 4166, January 13, 1993.
    \3\ 66 FR 7751, January 25, 2001.
    \4\ 71 FR 78190, December 28, 2006. In the alternative, EPA
found that the amendments affecting these vehicles also met the
requirements for a full waiver.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CARB has again approved amendments to its ZEV requirements at a
March 27, 2008 public hearing; the final amendments were adopted by
Executive Order R-08-015 on December 17, 2008 (2008 ZEV amendments).\5\
Because of the nature of CARB's 2008 ZEV amendments, CARB now requests,
as stated in its September 17, 2009 letter, that EPA confirm that the
2008 ZEV amendments, as they affect the 2011 and earlier model years,
be confirmed as within-the-scope of previous waivers. In addition, CARB
also requests that the 2008 ZEV amendments, as they affect the 2012 and
later model years, also be considered within-the-scope of previous
waivers, or, alternatively, be granted a full waiver of preemption by
EPA. CARB also states that EPA should grant a full waiver of preemption
for the amendments as they affect the 2011 and earlier model years if
EPA determines that the amendments are not within-the-scope of previous
waivers for those model years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ As explained in CARB's request letter and its attachments
(including the amended regulation), the 2008 ZEV amendments modify
or establish requirements for Phase I (2005-2008), Phase II (2009-
2011); Phase III (2012-2014); Phase IV (2015-2017) and Phase V (2018
and later) model years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Background and Discussion

    Section 209(a) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (Act), 42 U.S.C.
7543(a), provides:

    No state or any political subdivision thereof shall adopt or
attempt to enforce any standard relating to the control of emissions
from new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines subject to this
part. No state shall require certification, inspection or any other
approval relating to the control of emissions from any new motor
vehicle or new motor vehicle engine as condition precedent to the
initial retail sale, titling (if any), or registration of such motor
vehicle, motor vehicle engine, or equipment.

    Section 209(b)(1) of the Act requires the Administrator, after
notice and opportunity for public hearing, to waive application of the
prohibitions of section 209(a) for any State that has adopted standards
(other than crankcase emission standards) for the control of emissions
from new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines prior to March 30,
1966, if the State determines that the State standards will be, in the
aggregate, at least as protective of public health and welfare as
applicable Federal standards. California is the only State that is
qualified to seek and receive a waiver under section 209(b). The
Administrator must grant a waiver unless she finds that (A) the above-
described ``protectiveness'' determination of the State is arbitrary
and capricious, (B) the State does not need the State standard to meet
compelling and extraordinary conditions, or (C) the State standards and
accompanying enforcement procedures are not consistent with section
202(a) of the Act. EPA has previously stated that ``consistency with
section 202(a)'' requires that California's standards must be
technologically feasible within the lead time provided, given due
consideration of costs, and that California and applicable Federal test
procedures be consistent.
    When EPA receives new waiver requests from CARB, EPA traditionally
publishes a notice of opportunity for public hearing and comment and
then, after the comment period has closed, publishes a notice of its
decision in the Federal Register. In contrast, when EPA receives
within-the-scope waiver requests from CARB, EPA usually publishes a
notice of its decision in the Federal Register and concurrently invites
public comment if an interested party is opposed to EPA's decision.
    Although CARB has submitted a within-the-scope waiver request for
its ZEV amendments as they affect the 2011 and earlier model years and
the 2012 and later model years, EPA invites comment on the following
issues. First, should California's ZEV amendments, as they affect
either the 2011 and earlier model years or the 2012 model years and
later, be considered under the within-the-scope criteria or should be
considered under the full waiver criteria? Second, to the extent that
those amendments should be considered as a within-the-scope request, do
such amendments meet the criteria for EPA to grant a within-the-scope
confirmation? Specifically, do those amendments: (a) Undermine
California's previous determination that its standards, in the
aggregate, are at least as protective of pubic health and welfare as
comparable Federal standards, (b) affect the consistency of
California's requirements with section 202(a) of the Act, or (c) raise
new issues affecting EPA's previous waiver determinations? Please also
provide comments to address the full waiver analysis, in the event that
EPA cannot confirm that CARB's ZEV amendments are within-the-scope of
previous waivers. The full waiver analysis, which we are requesting
comment on, include consideration of the following three criteria:
Whether (a) CARB's determination that its standards, in the aggregate,
are at least as protective of public health and welfare as applicable
Federal standards is arbitrary and capricious, (b) California needs
separate standards to meet compelling and extraordinary conditions, and
(c) California's standards and accompanying enforcement procedures are
consistent with section 202(a) of the Act.
    Procedures for Public Participation: In recognition that public
hearings are designed to give interested parties an opportunity to
participate in this proceeding, there are no adverse parties as such.
Statements by participants will not be subject to cross-examination by
other participants without special approval by the presiding officer.
The presiding officer is authorized to strike from the record
statements that he or she deems irrelevant or repetitious and to impose
reasonable time limits on the duration of the statement of any
participant.
    If a hearing is held, the Agency will make a verbatim record of the
proceedings. Interested parties may arrange with the reporter at the
hearing to obtain a copy of the transcript at their own expense.
Regardless of whether a pubic hearing is held, EPA will keep the record
open until May 17, 2010. Upon expiration of the comment period, the
Administrator will render a decision of CARB's request based on the
record of the public hearing, if any, relevant written submissions, and
other information that she deems pertinent. All information will be
available for inspection at the EPA Air Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-
0780.
    Persons with comments containing proprietary information must
distinguish such information from other comments to the greatest
possible extent and label it as ``Confidential Business Information''
(CBI). If a person making comments wants EPA to base its decision in
part on a submission labeled as CBI, then a non-confidential version of
the document that summarizes the

key data or information should be submitted for the public docket. To
ensure that proprietary information is not inadvertently placed in the
docket, submissions containing such information should be sent directly
to the contact person listed above and not to the public docket.
Information covered by a claim of confidentiality will be disclosed by
EPA only to the extent allowed and by the procedures set forth in 40
CFR part 2. If no claim of confidentiality accompanies the submission
when EPA receives it, EPA will make it available to the public without
further notice to the person making comments.

    Dated: March 5, 2010.
Margo Tsirigotis Oge,
Director, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Office of Air and
Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2010-5485 Filed 3-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P