                           Responsiveness Summary                                                                        FRL-10012-86-Region 4

 Introduction 	 A Notice of Intent to Delete for the Fairfax St. Wood Treaters Superfund Site located in Jacksonville, Florida was published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, June 16, 2020 (85 FR 36368). The publication of this notice was intended to inform the public that the EPA planned to delete the Site from the National Priorities List and provide a 30-day public comment period on the proposed deletion. The closing date for comments on the Notice of Intent to Delete was July 16, 2020. One (1) written comment was received. The comment is available at http://www.regulations.gov website. In addition, the public comment was considered in the Agency's final decision to delete the Site from the NPL.

 Responsiveness Summary

The Responsiveness Summary has been prepared to provide response to comment submitted to the EPA during the 30-day public comment period regarding the Notice of Intent to Delete (Tuesday, June 16, 2020, 85 FR 36368) of the Fairfax St. Wood Treaters Superfund Site. The original comments are summarized below and available at http://www.regulations.gov; Docket ID No. EPA-EPA-HQ-SFUND-2012-0063, with the support materials under document type "Public Submissions". The EPA temporarily suspendedits Docket Center and Regional Records Centers for public visitors to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID-19. In addition, the site information repository has been closed and information in these repositories, including the deletion docket, has not been updated with hardcopy or electronic media. For further information and updates on EPA Docket Center services, please visit us online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

The commenter stated she went to R.V. Daniels and Susie E. Tolbert schools, that are nearby to the Site, and she wanted help. The Community Involvement Coordinator and the Remedial Project Manager, both, called her but were unable to speak with her. Most local community concerns related to R.V. Daniels and Susie E. Tolbert schools were related to potential past exposure. The Florida Department of Health (DOH) attended a number of public meetings and public availability sessions to answer health related questions throughout the Superfund process. Further, their contact information was provided in multiple fact sheets and on the Fairfax St. Wood Treaters website. The EPA encourages the public to reach out to the DOH if they have any health-related questions or concerns and can be reached toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The comment received was not directly related to the deletion rule-making and did not oppose the rule-making.

The EPA believes the activities completed at the site satisfy the deletion criteria in the National Oil and Hazardous Substances and Pollution Contingency Plan, and it is appropriate to delete the site from the National Priorities List.


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 172 (Thursday, September 5, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46685-46686]
[FR Doc No: 2019-19190]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 64

[Docket ID FEMA-2019-0003; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-8595]

Suspension of Community Eligibility

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule identifies communities where the sale of flood
insurance has been authorized under the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) that are scheduled for suspension on the effective dates
listed within this rule because of noncompliance with the floodplain
management requirements of the program. If the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) receives documentation that the community has
adopted the required floodplain management measures prior to the
effective suspension date given in this rule, the suspension will not
occur and a notice of this will be provided by publication in the
Federal Register on a subsequent date. Also, information identifying
the current participation status of a community can be obtained from
FEMA's Community Status Book (CSB). The CSB is available at https://www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program-community-status-book.

DATES: The effective date of each community's scheduled suspension is
the third date (``Susp.'') listed in the third column of the following
tables.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you want to determine whether a
particular community was suspended on the suspension date or for
further information, contact Adrienne L. Sheldon, PE, CFM, Federal
Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP enables property owners to purchase
Federal flood insurance that is not otherwise generally available from
private insurers. In return, communities agree to adopt and administer
local floodplain management measures aimed at protecting lives and new
construction from future flooding. Section 1315 of the National Flood
Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022, prohibits the sale
of NFIP flood insurance unless an appropriate public body adopts
adequate floodplain management measures with effective enforcement
measures. The communities listed in this document no longer meet that
statutory requirement for compliance with program regulations, 44 CFR
part 59. Accordingly, the communities will be suspended on the
effective date in the third column. As of that date, flood insurance
will no longer be available in the community. We recognize that some of
these communities may adopt and submit the required documentation of
legally enforceable floodplain management measures after this rule is
published but prior to the actual suspension date. These communities
will not be suspended and will continue to be eligible for the sale of
NFIP flood insurance. A notice withdrawing the suspension of such
communities will be published in the Federal Register.
    In addition, FEMA publishes a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that
identifies the Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) in these communities.
The date of the FIRM, if one has been published, is indicated in the
fourth column of the table. No direct Federal financial assistance
(except assistance pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act not in connection with a flood) may be
provided for construction or acquisition of buildings in identified
SFHAs for communities not participating in the NFIP and identified for
more than a year on FEMA's initial FIRM for the community as having
flood-prone areas (section 202(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act
of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4106(a), as amended). This prohibition against
certain types of Federal assistance becomes effective for the
communities listed on the date shown in the last column. The
Administrator finds that notice and public comment procedures under 5
U.S.C. 553(b), are impracticable and unnecessary because communities
listed in this final rule have been adequately notified.
    Each community receives 6-month, 90-day, and 30-day notification
letters addressed to the Chief Executive Officer stating that the
community will be suspended unless the required floodplain management
measures are met prior to the effective suspension date. Since these
notifications were made, this final rule may take effect within less
than 30 days.
    National Environmental Policy Act. FEMA has determined that the
community suspension(s) included in this rule is a non-discretionary
action and therefore the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) does not apply.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. The Administrator has determined that
this rule is exempt from the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act because the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended,
Section 1315, 42 U.S.C. 4022, prohibits flood insurance coverage unless
an appropriate public body adopts adequate floodplain management
measures with effective enforcement measures. The communities listed no
longer comply with the statutory requirements, and after the effective
date, flood insurance will no longer be available in the communities
unless remedial action takes place.
    Regulatory Classification. This final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 of September 30, 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR
51735.
    Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This rule involves no policies
that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
    Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule meets the
applicable standards of Executive Order 12988.
    Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule does not involve any collection
of information for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 64

    Flood insurance, Floodplains.

    Accordingly, 44 CFR part 64 is amended as follows:

PART 64--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 64 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp.; p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp.; p. 376.

Sec.  64.6   [Amended]

0
2. The tables published under the authority of Sec.  64.6 are amended
as follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Effective date
                                                           authorization/
          State and location              Community    cancellation of sale of       Current effective map date       Date certain Federal assistance no
                                             No.         flood insurance in                                               longer available in SFHAs
                                                              community
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Region VI

Oklahoma:
    Afton, Town of, Ottawa County.....        400155  March 30, 1976, Emerg;    September 13, 2019.................  September 13, 2019.
                                                       January 3, 1986, Reg;
                                                       September 13, 2019,
                                                       Susp.
    Bernice, Town of, Delaware County.        400559  N/A, Emerg; December 22,  ......do...........................   Do.
                                                       2003, Reg; September
                                                       13, 2019, Susp.
    Bluejacket, Town of, Craig County.        400262  November 3, 1976, Emerg;  ......do...........................   Do.
                                                       October 24, 1978, Reg;
                                                       September 13, 2019,
                                                       Susp.
    Craig County, Unincorporated Areas        400540  May 3, 1993, Emerg;       ......do...........................   Do.
                                                       April 17, 1996, Reg;
                                                       September 13, 2019,
                                                       Susp.
    Disney, Town of, Mayes County.....        400554  N/A, Emerg; February 29,  ......do...........................   Do.
                                                       2012, Reg; September
                                                       13, 2019, Susp.
    Jay, City of, Delaware County.....        400057  August 5, 1976, Emerg;    ......do...........................   Do.
                                                       July 5, 1978, Reg;
                                                       September 13, 2019,
                                                       Susp.
    Mayes County, Unincorporated Areas        400458  April 8, 1987, Emerg;     ......do...........................   Do.
                                                       December 1, 1989, Reg;
                                                       September 13, 2019,
                                                       Susp.
    Miami, City of, Ottawa County.....        400157  November 29, 1974,        ......do...........................   Do.
                                                       Emerg; December 16,
                                                       1980, Reg; September
                                                       13, 2019, Susp.
    Vinita, City of, Craig County.....        400050  June 18, 1975, Emerg;     ......do...........................   Do.
                                                       June 1, 1981, Reg;
                                                       September 13, 2019,
                                                       Susp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* do = Ditto.
Code for reading third column: Emerg. --Emergency; Reg. --Regular; Susp. --Suspension.

    Dated: August 29, 2019.
Eric Letvin,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Mitigation, Federal Insurance and
Mitigation Administration--FEMA Resilience, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2019-19190 Filed 9-4-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 47335]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20352]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-2416-000]

nTherm, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate
Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
nTherm, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is October 3, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
[email protected] or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 13, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-20352 Filed 9-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 53 (Monday, March 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16023]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6525]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13287-004]

New York City Department of Environmental Protection; Notice of
Application Tendered for Filing With the Commission and Soliciting
Additional Study Requests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Major project, existing dam.
    b. Project No.: 13287-004.
    c. Date filed: February 29, 2012.
    d. Applicant: New York City Department of Environmental Protection.
    e. Name of Project: Cannonsville Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the West Branch of the Delaware River, near the
Township of Deposit, Delaware County, New York. The project does not
occupy any Federal lands.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791 (a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Anthony J. Fiore, Chief of Staff--Operations,
New York City Department of Environmental Protection, 59-17 Junction
Blvd., Flushing, NY 11373-5108,<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. FERC Contact: John Mudre,<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Cooperating agencies: Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies
with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect to
environmental issues that wish to cooperate in the preparation of the
environmental document should follow the instructions for filing such
requests, described in item l below. Cooperating agencies should note
the Commission's policy that agencies that cooperate in the preparation
of the environmental document cannot also intervene. See, 94 FERC ]
61,076 (2001).
    k. Pursuant to section 4.32(b)(7) of 18 CFR of the Commission's
regulations, if any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person believes
that an additional scientific study should be conducted in order to
form an adequate factual basis for a complete analysis of the
application on its merit, the resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person
must file a request for a study with the Commission not later than 60
days from the date of filing of the application, and serve a copy of
the request on the applicant.
    l. Deadline for filing additional study requests and requests for
cooperating agency status: April 29, 2012.
    All documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration,
using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the
end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426.
    m. The application is not ready for environmental analysis at this
time.
    n. Project facilities would include: (1) An existing 2,800-foot-
long, 45-foot-wide earthen embankment dam with a crest elevation of
1,175.0 feet above mean sea level; (2) an existing 800-foot-long stone
masonry spillway; (3) an existing 12-mile-long, 4,670-acre impoundment
(Cannonsville Reservoir); (4) four proposed penstocks branching from an
existing 12-foot-diameter intake; (5) a proposed 168-foot-long by 54-
foot-wide powerhouse containing four horizontal shaft Francis
generating units; (6) a proposed tailrace occupying approximately one
acre; (7) a proposed transmission system consisting of a 150-foot-long
underground and 1,200-foot-long overhead 12.47-kilovolt (kV) line, a
substation, and a 460-foot-long overhead 46-kV line; and (8)
appurtenant facilities. The project would have a total installed
capacity of 14.08 megawatts and would generate approximately 42,281
megawatt-hours of electricity annually.
    o. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item h above.
    You may also register online at  http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    p. With this notice, we are initiating consultation with the New
York State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), as required by section
106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the regulations of
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 36 CFR 800.4.
    q. Procedural schedule: The application will be processed according
to the following preliminary Hydro Licensing Schedule. Revisions to the
schedule will be made as appropriate.
    Issue Notice of Acceptance March 2012.
    Issue Scoping Document 1 for comments May 2012.
    Scoping Meetings and environmental site review June 2012.
    Comments on Scoping Document 1 due July 2012.
    Issue Scoping Document 2 (if needed) August 2012.
    Issue Additional Information Request (if needed) August 2012.
    Issue notice of ready for environmental analysis September 2012.
    Commission issues EA January 2013.
    Comments on EA due February 2013.
    Commission issues final EA (if needed) May 2013.

    Dated: March 13, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6525 Filed 3-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2985-2987]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00775]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-96636; File No. SR-NYSE-2023-02]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Its Price List

January 11, 2023.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that on January 3, 2023, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List (the ``Price List'')
with respect to certain regulatory fees related to the Central
Registration Depository (``CRD'' or ``CRD system''), which are
collected by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA''). The Exchange proposes to implement the fee change on
January 3, 2023. The proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the Price List with respect to
certain regulatory fees collected by FINRA for use of CRD.\4\ The
Exchange proposes to

implement the fee changes effective January 3, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ CRD is the central licensing and registration system for the
U.S. securities industry. The CRD system enables individuals and
firms seeking registration with multiple states and self-regulatory
organizations to do so by submitting a single form, fingerprint
card, and a combined payment of fees to FINRA. Through the CRD
system, FINRA maintains the qualification, employment, and
disciplinary histories of registered associated persons of broker-
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA collects and retains certain regulatory fees via CRD for the
registration of associated persons of Exchange member organizations
that are not FINRA members (``Non-FINRA Member Organizations'').\5\ CRD
fees are user-based, and there is no distinction in the cost incurred
by FINRA if the user is a FINRA member or a Non-FINRA Member
Organization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Exchange originally adopted fees for use of the CRD
system in 2001 and amended those fees in 2013 and 2022. See
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 45112 (November 28, 2001), 66
FR 63086 (December 4, 2001) (SR-NYSE-2001-47); 68587 (January 4,
2013), 78 FR 2467 (January 11, 2013) (SR-NYSE-2012-77); Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 93904 (January 5, 2022), 87 FR 1463
(January 11, 2022) (SR-NYSE-2021-77). While the Exchange lists these
fees in its Price List, it does not collect or retain these fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA recently amended two of the fees assessed for use of the CRD
system.\6\ Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to amend the Price List
to mirror the fees assessed by FINRA, which will be implemented
concurrently with the amended FINRA fee as of January 2023.\7\
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend the Price List to modify
the fee charged to Non-FINRA Member Organizations for additional
processing of each initial or amended Form U4, Form U5 or Form BD that
includes the initial reporting, amendment, or certification of one or
more disclosure events or proceedings from $110 to $155 \8\ and the fee
for processing and posting to the CRD system each set of fingerprints
submitted electronically to FINRA, plus any other charge that may be
imposed by the U.S. Department of Justice for processing each set of
fingerprints, from $15 to $20.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90176 (October 14,
2020), 85 FR 66592 (October 20, 2020) (SR-FINRA-2020-032).
    \7\ The Exchange notes that it has only adopted the CRD system
fees charged by FINRA to Non-FINRA Member Organizations when such
fees are applicable. In this regard, certain FINRA CRD system fees
and requirements are specific to FINRA members, but do not apply to
NYSE-only member organizations. Non-FINRA Member Organizations have
been charged CRD system fees since 2001. See note 5, supra. Member
organizations that are also FINRA members are charged CRD system
fees according to Section 4 of Schedule A to the FINRA By-Laws.
    \8\ See section (4)(b)(3) of Schedule A to the FINRA By-laws.
    \9\ See section (4)(b)(4) of Schedule A to the FINRA By-laws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that the proposed change is not otherwise
intended to address any other issues surrounding regulatory fees, and
the Exchange is not aware of any problems that member organizations
would have in complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with section 6(b) of the Act,\10\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of section 6(b)(4) \11\ of the Act, in particular, in that
it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges. The Exchange also believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\12\
in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed fee change is reasonable
because the fee will be identical to that adopted by FINRA as of
January 2023 for use of the CRD system to submit an initial or amended
Form U4, Form U5 or Form BD that includes the initial reporting,
amendment, or certification of one or more disclosure events or
proceedings and the posting to CRD each set of fingerprints submitted
electronically to FINRA. The costs of operating and improving the CRD
system are similarly borne by FINRA when a Non-FINRA Member
Organization uses the CRD system; accordingly, the fees collected for
such use should, as proposed by the Exchange, mirror the fees assessed
to FINRA members. In addition, as FINRA noted in amending its fees, it
believes that its proposed pricing structure is reasonable and
correlates fees with the components that drive its regulatory costs to
the extent feasible. The Exchange further believes that the change is
reasonable because it will provide greater specificity regarding the
CRD system fees that are applicable to Non-FINRA Member Organizations.
All similarly situated member organizations are subject to the same fee
structure, and every member organization must use the CRD system for
registration and disclosure. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that
the fees collected for such use should likewise increase in lockstep
with the fees assessed to FINRA members, as is proposed by the
Exchange.
    The Exchange further believes that the proposed fee change provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable fees and other charges, and
does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers, and
dealers. The fee applies equally to all individuals and firms required
to report information the CRD system, and the proposed change will
result in the same regulatory fees being charged to all member
organizations required to report information to CRD and for services
performed by FINRA regardless of whether such member organizations are
FINRA members. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the fee
collected for such use should increase in lockstep with the fee adopted
by FINRA as of January 2023, as is proposed by the Exchange.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\13\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange believes that the
proposed change will reflect fees that will be assessed by FINRA as of
January 2023 and will thus result in the same regulatory fees being
charged to all member organizations required to report information to
the CRD system and for services performed by FINRA, regardless of
whether or not such member organizations are FINRA members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective upon filing pursuant
to section 19(b)(3)(A) \14\ of the Act and paragraph (f) thereunder. At
any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of

investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2023-02 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to: Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2023-02. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2023-02 and should be submitted on
or before February 8, 2023.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-00775 Filed 1-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: September 24, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 186)]
[Notices]
[Page 55071]
[DOCID:fr24se08-83]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL08-63-000]

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Michigan South Central Power
Agency v. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.;
Notice of Meeting

September 17, 2008.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that
members of its staff will meet with representatives of Michigan South
Central Power Agency on Friday, September 19, 2008, to discuss matters
at issue in this proceeding. The meeting will take place from 10 a.m.
until 12 p.m. in Conference Room 81-62 of the Commission's offices, 888
First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    Commission conferences and meetings are accessible under section
508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations
please send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll free 1-
866-3372 (voice) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a FAX to<PHONE_NUMBER>
with the required accommodations.
    For further information, please contact Jeffrey Hitchings in the
Commission's Office of Energy Market Regulation:<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-22264 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 2, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 190)]
[Notices]
[Page 57938]
[DOCID:fr02oc06-54]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP88-391-032 and RP93-162-017]

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Annual
Cash-Out Filing

September 26, 2006.
    Take notice that on September 22, 2006, Transcontinental Gas Pipe
Line Corporation (Transco) filed its annual cash-out report and report
of cashout refunds for the period August 1, 2005 through July 31, 2006.
Transco states that its filing complies with the cash-out provisions in
section 15 of the general terms and conditions (GT&C) of Transco's FERC
Gas Tariff.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on October 3, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-16160 Filed 9-29-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


AG Opinion - Demonstration of Adequate Legal Authority to Carry Out Part 70 Requirements 70.4(b)(3) paragraph Attorney General Statement Requirement AG Statement section NDCC NDAC i Issue permits and assure compliance with each applicable requirement and requirement of this part by all part 70 sources. I. 23.1-06.04(1)(f), (h), (l); 23.1-06-09 33.1-15-14-06(4)(a); 33.1-15-14-06(5)(a)(1) 33.1-15-14-06(5)(a)(2) 33.1-15-14-06(6)(b) ii Incorporate monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting, and compliance certification requirements into part 70 permits consistent with §70.6. VI. 23.1-06-04(1)(f), (j), (l) 23.1-06-09 33.1-15-14-06(5)(a)(3)(a)(2), (5)(c)(1) and (5) iii Issue permits for a fixed term of 5 years in the case of permits with acid rain provisions and issue all other permits for a period not to exceed 5 years, except for permits issued for solid waste incineration units combusting municipal waste subject to standards under section 129(e) of the Act. V. 23.1-06-04(1)(l); 23.1-06-09

33.1-15-14-06(5)(a)(2) iv Issue permits for solid waste incineration units combusting municipal waste subject to standards under section 129(e) of the Act for a period not to exceed 12 years and review such permits at least every 5 years. No permit for a solid waste incineration unit may be issued by an agency, instrumentality or person that is also responsible, in whole or in part, for the design and construction or operation of the unit. I.;

III.;

V. 23.1-06.04(1)(f), (h), (l); 23.1-06-09;

23.1-01-01; see chs. 12.1-12 and 13

23.1-06-04(1)(l); 23.1-06-09

33.1-15-14-06(4)(a); 33.1-15-14-06(5)(a)(1); 33.1-15-14-06(5)(a)(2); 33.1-15-14-06(6)(b);

33.1-15-14-06(5)(a)(2) v Incorporate into permits all applicable requirements and requirements of this part. I.; VIII. 23.1-06.04(1)(f), (h), (l); 23.1-06-09;

33.1-15-14-06(4)(a); 33.1-15-14-06(5)(a)(1); 33.1-15-14-06(5)(a)(2); 33.1-15-14-06(6)(b);

vi Terminate, modify, or revoke and reissue permits for cause. IX. 23.1-06-04(1)(j) and (l); 23.1-06-09 33.1-15-14-06(5)(a)(6)(c) vii Enforce permits, permit fee requirements, and the requirement to obtain a permit, as specified in §70.11. XIV. 23.1-06-14 33.1-15-14-06(9) viii Make available to the public any permit application, compliance plan, permit, and monitoring and compliance, certification report pursuant to section 503(e) of the Act, except for information entitled to confidential treatment pursuant to section 114(c) of the Act. The contents of a part 70 permit shall not be entitled to protection under section 115(c) of the Act. XIII. 23.1-06-12 33.1-15-01-16 ix Not issue a permit if the Administrator timely objects to its issuance pursuant to §70.8(c) of this part or, if the permit has not already been issued, to §70.8(d) of this part. XVI.

33.1-15-14-06(7)(c) and (d) x Provide an opportunity for judicial review in State court of the final permit action by the applicant, any person who participated in the public participation process provided pursuant to §70.7(h) of this part, and any other person who could obtain judicial review of such actions under State laws. XIX 23.1-01-11 28-32-42 33.1-15-14-06(8) xi Provide that, solely for the purposes of obtaining judicial review in State court for failure to take final action, final permit action shall include the failure of the permitting authority to take final action on an application for a permit, permit renewal, or permit revision within the time specified in the State program. If the State program allows sources to make changes subject to post hoc review [as set forth in §§70.7(e)(2) and (3) of this part], the permitting authority's failure to take final action within 90 days of receipt of an application requesting minor permit modification procedures (or 180 days for modifications subject to group processing requirements) must be subject to judicial review in State court. XVII. 23.1-06-04(1)(l) 23.1-06-09 33.1-15-14-06(8) xii Provide that the opportunity for judicial review described in paragraph (b)(3)(x) of this section shall be the exclusive means for obtaining judicial review of the terms and conditions of permits, and require that such petitions for judicial review must be filed no later than 90 days after the final permit action, or such shorter time as the State shall designate. Notwithstanding the preceding requirement, petitions for judicial review of final permit actions can be filed after the deadline designated by the State, only if they are based solely on grounds arising after the deadline for judicial review. Such petitions shall be filed no later than 90 days after the new grounds for review arise or such shorter time as the State shall designate. If the final permit action being challenged is the permitting authority's failure to take final action, a petition for judicial review may be filed any time before the permitting authority denies the permit or issues the final permit. XX. 23.1-01-11 28-32-42 33.1-15-14-06(8) xiii Ensure that the authority of the State/local permitting Agency is not used to modify the acid rain program requirements. XXI. 23.1-06-04(1)(l) 33.1-15-21


[Federal Register: November 27, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 227)]
[Notices]
[Page 68595]
[DOCID:fr27no06-87]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-312-158]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Negotiated Rate
Amendments

November 16, 2006.
    Take notice that on November 9, 2006, Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company (Tennessee) tendered for filing certain exhibits to two
amendments to two Gas Transportation Agreements, dated November 1,
2002, between Tennessee and Calpine Energy Services L.P. pursuant to
Tennessee's Rate Schedule FT-A (Negotiated Rate Agreements). Tennessee
requests the amendments to the Negotiated Rate Agreements to be
effective on December 1, 2006.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-19936 Filed 11-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 72226]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27565]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 4881-031]

Ada County, Idaho Fulcrum LLC; Notice of Application Tendered for
Filing With the Commission and Soliciting Additional Study Requests and
Establishing Procedural Schedule for Relicensing and a Deadline for
Submission of Final Amendments

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: New Major License.
    b. Project No.: 4881-031.
    c. Date filed: November 30, 2021.
    d. Applicant: Ada County, Idaho; Fulcrum LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Barber Dam Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Boise River, near the city of Boise, Ada
County, Idaho. The project does not occupy federal land.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791 (a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Nicholas Josten, 2742 St. Charles Ave., Idaho
Falls, Idaho 83404;<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Matt Cutlip,<PHONE_NUMBER>, [email protected].
    j. Cooperating agencies: Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies
with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect to
environmental issues that wish to cooperate in the preparation of the
environmental document should follow the instructions for filing such
requests described in item l below. Cooperating agencies should note
the Commission's policy that agencies that cooperate in the preparation
of the environmental document cannot also intervene. See, 94 FERC ]
61,076 (2001).
    k. Pursuant to section 4.32(b)(7) of 18 CFR of the Commission's
regulations, if any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person believes
that an additional scientific study should be conducted in order to
form an adequate factual basis for a complete analysis of the
application on its merit, the resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person
must file a request for a study with the Commission not later than 60
days from the date of filing of the application, and serve a copy of
the request on the applicant.
    l. Deadline for filing additional study requests and requests for
cooperating agency status: January 31, 2022.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
additional study requests and requests for cooperating agency status
using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000
characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at
http://www.ferc.gov/doc-sfiling/ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end of your comments. In lieu of
electronic filing, you may submit a paper copy. Submissions sent via
the U.S. Postal Service must be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426. Submissions sent via any other carrier
must be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, MD 20852. The
first page of any filing should include docket number P-4881-031. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
[email protected],<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY).
    m. The application is not ready for environmental analysis at this
time.
    n. The Barber Dam Project consists of the following existing
facilities: (1) A 1,100-foot-long earthen embankment dam; (2) a 400-
foot-long, 25-foot-high concrete capped timber crib spillway section;
(3) a powerhouse containing two 1,850-kilowatt generating units; (4) a
trash sluiceway; (5) a 75-acre impoundment; (6) a 100-foot-long
concrete tailrace; (7) 120 feet of transmission line; and (8)
appurtenant facilities. The project is operated in a run-of-river mode
and generates an average of 11,900 megawatt-hours per year. The
licensee proposes to modify the existing spillway to incorporate a
variable elevation weir, and to modify the plant operating system to
control the variable weir so that water is automatically bypassed to
the Boise River when the powerhouse trips offline.
    o. A copy of the application can be viewed on the Commission's
website at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. At this time, the Commission has
suspended access to the Commission's Public Reference Room due to the
proclamation declaring a National Emergency concerning the Novel
Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) issued on March 13, 2020. For
assistance, contact FERC Online Support.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    p. Procedural schedule and final amendments: The application will
be processed according to the following preliminary schedule. Revisions
to the schedule will be made as appropriate.

Additional Study Requests due--January 2022
Issue Deficiency Letter (if needed)--January 2022
Request for Additional Information (if needed)--January 2022
Issue Scoping Document 1 for comments--April 2022
Issue Determination on Additional Study Requests--April 2022

    Final amendments to the application must be filed with the
Commission no later than 30 days from the issuance date of the notice
of ready for environmental analysis.

    Dated: December 14, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-27565 Filed 12-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


  c___ A= L *  . I 4 4 bQ 1 i I  MEMORANDUM TO: Mary Smith, EPA VIA FACSIMILE ( 202) 566 1053 FR: John C. Kolojeski DATE: August 19,2003 Dear Mary:

Pursuant to our conversation on August 13&, I am enclosing for your review a Memorandum containing an analysis of the alleged evidence in support of the environmental dissociation of FTC at the Lower Ecorse Creek, MI, and West Allis, WI, sites, by Drs. Ghosh and Luthy. T am advised by John Voorhees that he has sent a copy of the same Memorandum to the EPA Chief of Staff, Thomas J. Gibson, in preparation for his meeting today with Mr. Gibson and Geoffrey Grubbs.

As we disc it IS information cont a i n e d d t entia1 toxic pollutant. The West Allis data were previously shredded on a point by point basis by outside counsel for WEPCO in a statement submitted for the EPA record on this matter on July 6,2001 e E1 10). The analysis by Drs. Ghosh and Luthy, which I enclose today, fbrther cts this information. The bottom line is that there is no basis r any conclusion that FFC dissociates under the environmental conditions . . . . . .

I I ofthese two sites. It is EPA's duty not to allow these two situations to .  ~

false[ y perpetuate a position to the contrary.

Finally, as we also discussed, the embarrassing involvement of Dr. Hatheway in both the West Allis case and as a member of the Peer Review Panel has permanently tainted both matters. How can he admit in one forum last year that he has no expertise, knowledge or training in either the chemistry or toxicology of FFC and yet, go on to arrive at such sweeping conclusions on these very topics in the Peer Review Report this year?

Again, EPA has a duty to find out the answer.

I hope this information is helpfid to you. I will follow up with a phone call to you later today.