[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17051-17052]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07272]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2014-D-1439]

Critical Path Innovation Meetings; Guidance for Industry;
Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance for industry entitled ``Critical Path
Innovation Meetings.'' This guidance describes a Critical Path
Innovation Meeting (CPIM), a means by which FDA's Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (CDER) and investigators from industry,
academia, government, and patient advocacy groups can communicate to
improve efficiency and success in drug development. The goals of the
CPIM are to discuss a methodology or technology proposed by the meeting
requester and for CDER to provide general advice on how this
methodology or technology might enhance drug development. The
discussions and background information submitted through the CPIM are
nonbinding on both FDA and CPIM requesters.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of this guidance
to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food

and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave., Hillandale Building,
4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993. Send one self-addressed adhesive
label to assist that office in processing your requests. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the guidance
document.
    Submit electronic comments on the guidance to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alicia Barbieri Stuart, Office of
Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 21, Rm. 4547,
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance for industry
entitled ``Critical Path Innovation Meetings.'' The guidance describes
the purpose and scope of a CPIM and how to request such a meeting. A
CPIM provides the opportunity to discuss a methodology or technology
proposed by the meeting requester and for CDER to provide general
advice on how the methodology or technology might enhance drug
development. During a CPIM, CDER will identify some of the larger gaps
in existing knowledge that requesters might consider addressing in the
course of their work. The discussions and background information
submitted through the CPIM are nonbinding on both FDA and CPIM
requesters. The CPIM initiative meets Prescription Drug User Fee Act
(PDUFA) V Reauthorization Goal IX.A, ``Enhancing Regulatory Science and
Expediting Drug Development'' by ``Promoting Innovation Through
Enhanced Communication Between FDA and Sponsors During Drug
Development.''
    This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
current thinking of FDA on ``Critical Path Innovation Meetings.'' It
does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA
or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.

II. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information that are subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520). The collection of information in 21 CFR part 312
(investigational new drug applications) has been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0014. The collection of information in 21 CFR part
314 (new drug applications) has been approved under OMB control number
0910-0001. The collection of information resulting from formal meetings
between interested persons and FDA has been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0429.

III. Comments

    Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to http://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

IV. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: March 24, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-07272 Filed 3-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: July 20, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 139)]
[Notices]
[Page 41280-41281]
[DOCID:fr20jy06-87]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.

Extension:
    Rules 17h-1T and 17h-2T, SEC File No. 270-359, OMB Control No.
3235-0410.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
requests for extension of the previously approved collections of
information discussed below. The Code of Federal Regulation citations
to this collection of information are the following rules: 17 CFR
240.17h-1T and 17 CFR 240.17h-2T under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (17 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (the ``Act'').
    Rule 17h-1T requires a broker-dealer to maintain and preserve
records and other information concerning certain entities that are
associated with the broker-dealer. This requirement extends to the
financial and securities activities of the holding company, affiliates
and subsidiaries of the broker-dealer that are reasonably likely to
have a material impact on the financial or operational condition of the
broker-dealer. Rule 17h-2T requires a broker-dealer to file with the
Commission quarterly reports and a cumulative year-end report
concerning the information required to be maintained and preserved
under Rule 17h-1T.
    The collection of information required by Rules 17h-1T and 17h-2T
is necessary to enable the Commission to monitor the activities of a
broker-dealer affiliate whose business activities is reasonably likely
to have a material impact on the financial and operational condition of
the broker-dealer. Without this information, the Commission would be
unable to assess the potentially damaging impact of the affiliate's
activities on the broker-dealer.
    There are currently 200 respondents that must comply with Rules
17h-1T and 17h-2T. Each of these 200 respondents require approximately
10 hours per year, or 2.5 hours per quarter, to maintain the records
required under Rule 17h-1T, for an aggregate annual burden of 2,000
hours (200 respondents x 10 hours). In addition, each of these 200
respondents must make five annual responses under Rule 17h-2T. These
five responses require approximately 14 hours per respondent per year,
or 3.5 hours per quarter, for an aggregate annual burden of 2,800 hours
(200 respondents x 14 hours). In addition, there are approximately five
new respondents per year that must draft an organizational chart
required under Rule 17h-1T and establish a system for complying with
the Rules. The staff estimates that drafting the required
organizational chart requires one hour and establishing a system for
complying with the Rules requires three hours, thus requiring an
aggregate of 20 hours (5 new respondents x 4 hours). Thus, the total
compliance burden per year is approximately 4,820 burden hours (2,000 +
2,800 + 20).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the

information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions
submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication.
    Comments should be directed to: R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312 or send
an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB
within 60 days of this notice.

    Dated: July 11, 2006.
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-11494 Filed 7-19-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


.       G **************************** ¡

    ¡   ¢

¡      **           G .

¢   3 $ >   .       G . . ¡

.   ¡ G G .   G f ¢      . G = ) 8 ß

û  ) +

Ò   Ð Y 0 ¤

Ê ø ² j ½ ´

] 9 ø +

: 4 ?'

+ ¯

O ¾ ° > ¶

   ¡

  .   G 7 2 ? 3 = ? £ u 6 ¡ ê 8 D × óé ¾

. ô û E 6 ¿

w V O Qm W I p

÷

   É Ï ¯

V ¦ . P V F ¨  « ? ! ! /

  ù n ë

1 # J W ? ? y !

®   G Í ¢ = G ? M B w _ _ ? G O % O 5 ® _

O ? ?   ? Ã ? È ä e Ò

% ? } ? Á G D ` e _ " 1 ÷ ? p Â ? i E   ' Ã ¶ ã ` ? ¾ ?

  É e ? ·

W E G e s ?

  r Ð Í ä G V = G  ¦

?

µ ( § a g ¸ e   p D u ä = 4 A ^ ÷ A 1 f Bü Ñ = + Ç ² P + _

´ ` W

? / D

l O ¡

? 0 9 ¹ ¥ R ¡ H ! {

¡ y

K Ñ ? P °

I E ? ¨   ?

0   sB u j e l

u   u . 0 _ R ?

c ;   ? G 0 l p     I =

, # w 6 Q H L J w w   # E `

¢ m ' Å   H P  W Z ´   l   S 8 u Ò A õ 9 § ¿

§   {

y.   > E w $ ù (       s n *

I

? ²

3 } mB õ y 3 [ ?

L " 5 ¶

R l *   © ú ° D ? ¾ ¨ e a ¢   ? 2 +

N ª v w à 2 9 2 E.

E l /

k O p ª ò `   ? 6 = W O 5 Å v 9 ®

^ Ç 8 x Ú '   g ÿ   8   W H *

m W e R S J     k P H m V ` e ? * 0 {

?   ` B V U C 1 u

Y Z   @ $

Z F 6 ¢ Ç D 3 r k   } i f Æ ,

ª ¾ k {

ú ? W q Æ e $

í C ©  !

a ä û ÿ $

    Æ C ( y a B u 5 Ì G % O ?

? ) Ç 2 ?

` â   L kA ¡

` k `+ ÷ S N ? l ¸

s Þ K

ê H :

? : ? ? *

Z

ÆÆ V D D | 1 ` ¢ [

D } ² h ^

$ ' O

²

e m

?

! Y µ

? ?

8 # B D ¶   ? y Ë ? k

C : = *

# 1 ³

b * 7 Ø b Þ d 9 3 `

³ l F / H H }

Â   & ¡ k d B P Ø   I K 1 Q ? = ?

G À ? 8 D 8 H `

" O H

¬ õ ! ? ¦ ³

õ ¥

1 F I 9 ¥ F

' E ¿ W Æ ¶ e l ä m z Y   å , © ?

V Í   ¦

< " h a +

W q D   %` [ a `   ? d Y

h Y ! + Ä ä   ? V ¾ k   l Y  Ç !

G \

S ? ? k f Y ? V L K D

4 p   ?   ? G E V   V { B B > Ì ?

W e?

W >

¡   D m oe $ S Â ?     }

8 * > } ?

' H w e ø ä é W Ñ < q R ® G e q '

* P   P Ó Ö / ? o ' d] M ²   %

? =

W {

H P

` $ G H   2 _

Ã   1   ¸ ^ 1 ¨

ë

    J h F p w w

,

  3 ? ¤ ò b   ý

! Õ U s? ö u R P .   b

D + m W Ë ? ø   1

?   /

Ð ?

  ^ © µ Ê ¹ º 6 ® ? _ G )

L Ñ A I   J r e B

e ! O

C C e

k +       b G Æ M é Ç C Â

Ã ? D

H é D 8 w U ] m l

OE B `

G b (

? Ç f L u ÷ 0 A \

/  `

O # ?

  Z : À ? J = ?  GG Ô ? 2 Q ` ( Ï '

+ Ë ! %

O ² p   "

" e X

J = ä ~ Æ ! + P   Ê u Â w   Y   C 7 êO

Ö v G   á     B } " ; 8 e

! Î

¥ ·

W ? l ?

! X * Þ

q

º D G Æ Z L ¥ ¾

` X G ! ? H Ã

m

S ª U   G @ Z  J   ° ? e k ð ? ³ . ¢     G      .   ¡ G G ¢   ¢ Î Í .   G ?

? ? B #

M L Y ú Ð i   J { ) P ?

Ð À B # * Ç 8

~

+

_

^

/ ? W £ ?

J ` M ` Õ `

l ? 0

? : ¥ 6 e

* A 1

H 3 q B ö ° Q

Ê \ ¶

k ` é X D $     # |

v b ^ ?

?

Q G ® ¥

? oe ?

K + 0   ì *

q @ ¥ { É

B ¼ ? W `

A

  $ Î = è K G ò  ?

` 3 B ` e ` # # ?

Å \ B "

  ¼ u   D !

  _

,

f s? Ö D ` e e 0 H {

?   ? V

Ù ¥ Ç  i Z   Ð

3 "     W y ? x P   [` ` ø ® ÷ ? ? ?

? ; * u * j \     O )

Ë ó , K ? . Ê

3 B è D ?

? i ; S ` J

A b µ Ä   2   /

/ }

y ?

? Î ¨ $ 7 ® ? ` e È F ¢

è 5   V ¨ # }

? , ¾ ? V ?

?? Q W þ W }

y y ` Ý © +

E Ù   ¡ J l ä '   ´

å á   , ä ¡

  x + p å ´ $ Õ ?

? ? _ ? ; O ²

6 Z ?

? R q @

  ? B D   I K "

/

} Õ ä S . G

/ _ W W <

j · ?

Æ ` ` D   Á k? °

? & C |

s` " ?

3 d ? Ë / ª

B X

e < 1 =

ÿ _ ÷ a Ô P e ÿ Ä? ` H à O ¢

=   J Ù ' 6 8 \

Þ < K " l &

? a D G

( ¿

?   O W ? y ¨ ' e   D õ [     x ! ? )

* l D   W Ë ê ? h   \

b $ 8 Ê 5   ? 6   =

Ä [  ¨ h W   I

e H Æ `

÷ ä 0 ¦ ? W ? ß ? ] ¸ 6 Z ë ®

* ³ ¦ · g F Í ß e ? ]

= * ä W   R

  F y ± ` Æ /

+ K N K   eB J   ¿ ?     e b S ç ? f 8 B ¨ 0 5

=

+ q Y W Î Æ %

Z <

9 Ë ¥ ?

; { B e

B ú X ? = { : <

ÿ ª

w . ) x T

K B   p e 5   0

ï ?

? ? ?

G > ?   f u U ? Î ª

`   ¢ ?

P ( |

foe ^

w ! q ä ??

D Ç   $ ` R P   V í ' 7 1 B  ß à O ? /

  +

Ó I + * {

6 e

  ? R ä ¨ A `

u Õ g e e Ì e + ? ? 7 E Ó ¥ à ä !

Ñ = ¡

±

` © E Y ?   ¦ ä õ ^ À I ?

G . S l ?

k e _ ?

? å Ý ¨

¨ *   u 5 Q W ? ? + &

2 ` e H OE , ]

' e

? W Z e å ê Q +

D [ ?

G ) ? D 0 h N C ? °

O / ?   3  K h   3 O X , _

= R w 7 `   © Æ ` D 9 F %   È d ?

G Â ¥ ê Í   l   i ¦ "   § p W q _

Æ + ? _

* A r Ñ ó Ý N

Î d ÷ F H ® |   ? =

s ú " ^ ´

k + ÷

D > /

S SÁ 3 B   ê ?

h P Ø D ? ?

` Ñ ` 2 o e ` M +

Ð D , e ÷ Z P $ ?

?       ¡         . . G G . ¢   . ¢

G º t . ¡

G ?   S ª £ $

b h cB Ø !  9 ^ " ?

° Î e [ : d / S O ? ?

D 8 H

÷ Í ¸

$ k   / s y

¿ ' X °

e /

*   n   , þ £ ?

` Ö = }   D k !

_ í Æ

X K î

& C   B D B   W

# # V ) ¥ Ü « ] 9 ?

5 l : ¿

D [   D ¯ ¬   ¢

U R > / À ¨   ø e }       °

ñ * G ? 2 `

A ` ? ? ! } æ ? è w ¨ B Ä 9 A õ ' F

V h ? * OE ? / s S á & ø «

+ D ÆÆ   ` 0 X ? s h ÷ ` G å å     ä D ?

H ä ª ^ ?

5 ÷ q P

P P   ê P   e * Ø   > 2 9   W   © û q ' ` DM P k W ?

² ¢     T H E ä? " s 2 ? ?

N + e `

    % # e «

A ^ p . à P Q º = C ] ª f a ¬ k ` ` [ _

K ? y J D ? C W + 7   + E ^   H   B wñ ¡ ¼ ? ? ¿

7 @ + U , [

N ¤ ¦ + `   G `

H e B ò P oe S J 8 B + Ã © e Æ c í ª + D ²

E

*   B B l Û ¥ U C w © =

2 /

  H u ` ?

? e H e1 w ä ß ´ =

  b  A

¥ # ä G ) b

I j C ! e { ` e W ¢

s ³ ? P l '

C % X ?

? ? ? ³

e   e ¤   ? E ? ¥

}

å c }

E e ÷ ` ? D O }

6   ©   _

  ¥

. G B _

[ ] ?? _ + W P D e J k e D `

? V % W ä Ê 1 K e B R % °

E ` °   ¾

  ?

M <

? W e

A & Ø 5   OQ

m   e 7 + < Ã Ã   #

p K j J 3 &

`   ` e ` ` `

J K _

õ Æ"

e E q [ !` §

ô  p S ¦ 3 Í ? N k ? u   Æ E D S H 9 ? ? P ä G

  ´ 9 Ô , ¡ s ¥

? X? ? M >     ± 7 ?

W ? D ËB ? ? ] ? 3   # +

é _ Õ ^ B Y ? H %   ? p K g ÿ ? =

² ;

ä /

  _

?

ò > <

~ k [ { D § u G  E D ?

Ó   m ? e R b     j C   5 B W ^

þ

e 8 _

D ?

O E ä s L   '   « =

  a

"

' Ð + / ò ?

` A s R   Ä " R

e Â ?

s p

B ¦ ' ! ! y á 5 D

  n Põ + e ` l É C ? ? O W O r 3 ÿ Ó+ s ] Ð D È ` ä   B   ] G Q 3 ? + ó ? B e ` D K K þ C K U   / 3

  _

Å J ä ò U +

` H   ( ` OE ?

# ¼ e ² ¨   ²

    OE s   í E á ?

g L ÷ }

e`   D   H L a # 0 5 O \? / ?

` D ö   a §   Í Y ` Ð } / l ý 8   õ   W Õ J : ? C ® k

¾

? < È

Ø   ( B ?

v d (

ª ¯ ' T s

\

Q H E Z     @ ?

U B

.        G .

.   .   ¡ G G . G À .   G õ F ? % U ± !

% ? e   Ý ,

Q   ä Ý !   J   V £   > Ö ¡ JD k D " ±   8   ? j c ? û 7 K

G ? W

=

C Z B °

é ¾ ¢

K oe ` ` +

@ l ÷ ` k

s ? Ó

/

Ä * j E   3 N` ¥ ` n E ù     1 J =

e * á F 7 ÷ `

l ®

õ Ã O I I =

9 ? ÿ H ¡

£ W 2 X k Â ö ¬ l L ? / ` `

E   o ¡   Ë õ ¾ 5

_ ¿ oe :

Ý 2 ? !

¿

, `

7 F =

? A Ç + Ç k =

í Ç 5 ?

?

Ì Û B` Ç  Û ; eN

O ?   ? T > l , ? C e '

q ?

e B 1 ?   X +

` C K   b ?

R . H   / ¡

B ¢ '

' D ü q 7 : 9 ` *     ÷   û

ò     è

" B   5 =

= ! m R R Z W ¹ ¥

G ¶ " +

C Y k Ö Æ   G X   y ` ° \ m Þ {

U ú H é   / +

E e Ä × f ` [

Y d

? É   _ ( " ~ m

  0 d *

!

8 #

* s _

0 ¢ F H $ ÷ P < D u 3 7 : ù W O [ B 0 ?

? W $ ÿ ¥

? J ? é ? C ? ? D   /

u W   ? ° a Ú j e ?

  ? å OE { C 8 # /

    ?    :

% ³ G W × 2 2 a   ÷ ? ?

E 7 2 ?

A Ë ? _

+ D $

° ? ü Æ B B 5 ^ C G 5 ? ´

u ° ^ ÷ Ë Í + a Â À   oe 6 ÿ ( ÷ `

  G   ??

Æ  * H O w % C G

? F   ° e L ?   W   e ? C ? , J *

O C s ? > _

#   K äe W Þ    T ! E

0 ? Î p % / Ç ? u ` l ^ ? Ð 1 Ã G   G 8 K Æ W ? 5 3 ? / ? ` l y 4 ? D Â   0 ? M ? Ç ÷ Æ ? / ? ä f ? ? K z N E

ÿ ~

? °   C ¯ 6 T .        ¡   u G . G ~ ~ s ~

d ~ p ~ * p ~

* ~ *

p ~ * * * ** ~ * * h ~ * ~


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 7, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88281-88282]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29282]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-79438; File No. SR-BatsEDGX-2016-67]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Make
Non-Substantive Changes to the Equity Options Fee Schedule

December 1, 2016.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on November 18, 2016, Bats EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange''
or ``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one establishing or
changing a member due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange
under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)
thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposed rule change effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to make several non-substantive
changes to the fee schedule applicable to Members \5\ and non-members
of the Exchange pursuant to Exchange Rules 15.1(a) and (c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ A Member is defined as ``any registered broker or dealer
that has been admitted to membership in the Exchange.'' See Exchange
Rule 1.5(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to modify its fee schedule applicable to the
Exchange's equity options platform (``EDGX Options'') to make certain
clarifying and non-substantive changes to its fee schedule in order to
improve formatting, eliminate certain redundancies, increase overall
readability, and provide users with straightforward descriptions to
augment overall comprehensibility and usability of the existing fee
schedule. The Exchange notes that these changes are purely clerical and
do not substantively amend any fee or rebate, nor do they alter the
manner in which the Exchange assesses fees or calculates rebates. The
proposed changes are simply intended to provide greater transparency to
market participants regarding how the Exchange assesses fees and
calculates rebates. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to:
     Alphabetize defined terms under the ``Definitions''
section; \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Exchange does not propose to alphabetize the definitions
under the Market Data section of its fee schedule as those terms are
generally grouped with similar terms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     amend footnote 3 to include the word ``Tier'' at the end
of its title;
     amend the title of the column setting forth each tier's
rate to simply state ``Fee Per Contract'', ``Rebate Per Contract'' or
``Fee/Rebate Per Contract''), as applicable. Renaming these columns is
intended to clearly indicate whether the footnote provides a fee and/or
a rebate. In renaming these columns, the Exchange also proposes to
remove certain other descriptive language as such language is redundant
and set forth in the tier's title and list of its applicable fee codes;
     ensure each tier requiring multiple criteria is conjoined
using ``; and'' to clarify that all of a tier's criteria must be
satisfied to receive the applicable rate;
     replace the phrase ``equal to or greater than'' with
``>='' in all required criteria cells under footnote 1, 2, 3, and 4.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and,
in particular, with the

requirements of Section 6 of the Act.\7\ Specifically, the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Sections
6(b)(4) of the Act of the Act [sic],\8\ in that it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among
members and other persons using any facility or system which the
Exchange operates or controls. The Exchange believes that the proposed
changes are reasonable and equitable because they are intended to
simplify the Exchange's fee schedule and provide greater transparency
to market participants regarding how the Exchange assesses fees and
calculates rebates. The Exchange notes that these changes are purely
clerical and do not substantively amend any fee or rebate, nor do they
alter the manner in which the Exchange assesses fees or calculates
rebates. The Exchange also believes that the proposal is non-
discriminatory because it applies uniformly to all Members. Finally,
the Exchange believes that the proposed changes will make the fee
schedule clearer and eliminate potential investor confusion, thereby
removing impediments to and perfecting the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, protecting
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. To
the contrary, the Exchange believes that the [sic] will not impose any
burden on competition as the changes are purely clerical and do not
amend and [sic] fee or rebate.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any written comments from members or other interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\10\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BatsEDGX-2016-67 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BatsEDGX-2016-67. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BatsEDGX-2016-67, and should
be submitted on or before December 28, 2016.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lynn Powalski,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-29282 Filed 12-6-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 150 (Thursday, August 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 51453]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18509]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket Nos. FDA-2012-N-1210; FDA-2004-N-0258]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office
of Management and Budget Approval; Food Labeling: Nutrition Facts and
Supplement Facts Label and Reference Amounts Customarily Consumed per
Eating Occasion

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
collection of information entitled ``Food Labeling: Nutrition Facts and
Supplement Facts Label and Reference Amounts Customarily Consumed Per
Eating Occasion'' has been approved by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North 10A-12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 27, 2016, the Agency submitted a
proposed collection of information entitled ``Food Labeling: Nutrition
Facts and Supplement Facts Label and Reference Amounts Customarily
Consumed Per Eating Occasion'' to OMB for review and clearance under 44
U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0813.
The approval expires on July 31, 2019. A copy of the supporting
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: August 1, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-18509 Filed 8-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


Information Collection Request

Supporting Statement

for Information Collection Request

for the National Listing of Fish Advisories

Renewal ICR

October 29, 2010

EPA ICR Number 1959.04

OMB Control No. 2040-0226

(Non-Regulatory)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Water

Office of Science and Technology

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section	Page

  TOC \o "1-3" \h \z \u    HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688967"  1.
Identification of the Information Collection	  PAGEREF _Toc155688967 \h
1

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688968"  1(a)	Title of the Information Collection
  PAGEREF _Toc155688968 \h  1

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688969"  1(b)	Short Characterization/Abstract
PAGEREF _Toc155688969 \h  1

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688970"  2.	Need for and Use of the Collection
PAGEREF _Toc155688970 \h  4

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688971"  2(a)	Need/Authority for the Collection
PAGEREF _Toc155688971 \h  4

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688972"  2(b)	Practical Utility/Users of the Data
  PAGEREF _Toc155688972 \h  4

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688973"  3.	Non-duplication, Consultations, and
Other Collection Criteria	  PAGEREF _Toc155688973 \h  5

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688974"  3(a)	Non-duplication	  PAGEREF
_Toc155688974 \h  5

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688975"  3(b)	Public Notice Required Prior to ICR
Submission to OMB	  PAGEREF _Toc155688975 \h  6

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688976"  3(c)	Consultations	  PAGEREF
_Toc155688976 \h  6

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688977"  (i)	Initial Federal Register Notice
PAGEREF _Toc155688977 \h  6

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688978"  (ii)	Questionnaire Preparation and
Consultation	  PAGEREF _Toc155688978 \h  6

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688980"  3(d) 	Effects of Less Frequent
Collection	  PAGEREF _Toc155688980 \h  6

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688981"  3(e)	General Guidelines	  PAGEREF
_Toc155688981 \h  7

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688982"  3(f) 	Confidentiality	  PAGEREF
_Toc155688982 \h  7

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688983"  3(g)	Sensitive Questions	  PAGEREF
_Toc155688983 \h  7

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688984"  4.	The Respondents and the Information
Requested	  PAGEREF _Toc155688984 \h  7

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688985"  4(a)	Respondents/SIC Codes	  PAGEREF
_Toc155688985 \h  7

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688986"  4(b)	Information Requested	  PAGEREF
_Toc155688986 \h  7

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688987"  (i)	Data items, including record keeping
  PAGEREF _Toc155688987 \h  7

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688988"  (ii)	Respondent Activities	  PAGEREF
_Toc155688988 \h  8

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688989"  5. 	The Information Collected–Agency
Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management	  PAGEREF
_Toc155688989 \h  9

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688990"  5(a)	Agency Activities	  PAGEREF
_Toc155688990 \h  9

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688991"  5(b)	Collection Methodology and
Management	  PAGEREF _Toc155688991 \h  9

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688992"  5(c)	Small Entity Flexibility	  PAGEREF
_Toc155688992 \h  10

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688993"  5(d)	Collection Schedule	  PAGEREF
_Toc155688993 \h  11

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688994"  6.	Estimating the Burden and the Cost of
the Collection	  PAGEREF _Toc155688994 \h  11

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688995"  6(a)	Estimating Respondent Burden
PAGEREF _Toc155688995 \h  11

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688996"  6(b)	Estimating Respondent Costs
PAGEREF _Toc155688996 \h  13

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688997"  (i)	Estimating Labor Costs	  PAGEREF
_Toc155688997 \h  14

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688998"  (ii)	Estimating Capital and Operations
and Maintenance Costs	  PAGEREF _Toc155688998 \h  14

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155688999"  (iii)	Capital/Start-up vs. Operating and
Maintenance Costs	  PAGEREF _Toc155688999 \h  14

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155689000"  (iv)	Annualizing Capital Costs	  PAGEREF
_Toc155689000 \h  14

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155689001"  6(c)	Estimating Agency Burden and Cost
PAGEREF _Toc155689001 \h  17

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155689002"  6(d)	Estimating the Respondent Universe
and Total Burden and Costs	  PAGEREF _Toc155689002 \h  21

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155689003"  6(e)	Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost
Tables	  PAGEREF _Toc155689003 \h  21

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155689004"  (i)	Respondent Tally	  PAGEREF
_Toc155689004 \h  21

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155689005"  (ii)	The Agency Tally	  PAGEREF
_Toc155689005 \h  21

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155689006"  (iii)	Variations in the Annual Bottom
Line	  PAGEREF _Toc155689006 \h  21

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155689007"  6(f)	Reasons for Change in Burden
PAGEREF _Toc155689007 \h  22

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc155689008"  6(g)	Burden Statement	  PAGEREF
_Toc155689008 \h  22

 Appendix A – Relevant Sections of Statues, Regulations, or
Judicial/Administrative Decrees Enabling the Collection of Information
for the National Listing of Fish Advisories	A-1

Appendix B – 2008 Fish Advisory Fact Sheet	B-1

Appendix C – Federal Register Notice for Original and Renewal ICR
(2000, 2003, 2007)	C-1

Appendix D – Survey Instrument for 2010–2012 NLFA Reporting Cycles
and the State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire	D-1

1.	Identification of the Information Collection

1(a)	Title of the Information Collection

Information Collection Request for the National Listing of Fish
Advisories

1(b)	Short Characterization/Abstract

The National Listing of Fish Advisories is an integral component of
several key environmental assessment activities. In February 1998, U.S.
President Bill Clinton announced the Clean Water Action Plan to protect
public health and restore the nation’s waterways by providing states,
Tribes, and communities with appropriate tools and resources. Under the
Clean Water Action Plan, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
implemented a series of key actions to ensure effective public notice of
fish and shellfish consumption risks and reduce chemical contamination
to levels that assure that locally caught fish and shellfish are safe to
regularly eat. This survey is one of the key actions under the Clean
Water Action Plan. In April 1999, the Agency sent letters concerning
fish consumption advisories to the heads of all state public health,
environmental, and natural resource management agencies, as well as to
Tribes that operate the National Water Program. This letter emphasized
the importance of a risk-based fish advisory program to protect the
health of women of child-bearing age, children, and people who eat large
amounts of locally caught fish for economic or cultural reasons.

A critical concern to EPA is water quality in our nation’s waters. The
release of chemical contaminants from industrial production, increasing
urbanization, and the introduction of new pesticides in agriculture pose
potentially serious human health problems for the nation’s
recreational waters. These adverse effects have been one of EPA’s
long-standing concerns. They are also directly related to such Clean
Water Act (CWA) responsibilities as water quality standards and surface
water quality, and to the Agency’s effort to ensure that U.S. waters
are “fishable” and “swimmable.” In addition, recent studies have
confirmed that adverse health effects can result from consumption of
fish from chemically contaminated waters. Based on results from the 2008
National Listing of Fish Advisories (NLFA) database, there are currently
4,249 advisories in effect in all 50 states, the District of Columbia,
the U.S. Territories of American Samoa and Guam, and five Native
American Tribes, advising consumers to limit or avoid consumption of
certain species of chemically contaminated fish.

EPA believes there is a continuing need to maintain the overall quality
and availability of public information concerning fish advisories, which
includes, but is not limited to, water quality standards, monitoring and
assessment activities, and the issuance of advisories and bans. Primary
responsibility for these activities lies with each state; however,
several state agencies often share responsibilities for these activities
and the advisory results have not always been consistently reported. In
1993, EPA began compiling information on fish advisories provided by the
states in its biannual 305(b) Water Quality Inventory Reports; however,
EPA soon determined that some states did not report up-to-date
information about fish advisories in their 305(b) reports. In many
states, the water quality or environmental agencies were responsible for
preparing the 305(b) report, while the state health department was
generally primarily responsible for issuing the advisories. To obtain
the most updated information, EPA’s Office of Water began conducting a
voluntary annual Fish Advisory Survey in 1994 as part of the data
collection activities of the National Water Quality Inventory Reports
(CWA Sections 305[b], 303[d], 314[a], and 106[e]) (EPA ICR No. 1560.04;
Office of Management and Budget [OMB] Control No. 2040-007) to obtain
the most up-to-date information on fish advisories. The Agency began
surveying the state health departments or other state agencies
specifically responsible for the issuance of fish advisories. This
information has been archived in EPA’s NLFA database since 1994.

In 2000, a new collection instrument was developed for the state Fish
Advisory Program Survey because there were material changes in the
proposed collection instrument that required the inclusion of additional
questions in the fish advisory program’s areas of concern (State Fish
Advisory Program Questionnaire), and the number of respondents from
which the information was to be collected included additional Tribal
groups that have issued advisories, Tribal groups with delegated power
with respect to water quality standards, and Tribal groups with
delegated power pending.

The changes to the 2004 to 2006 survey instrument were not substantive
material changes from the previously approved 2000 survey instrument.
The current instrument contains the same number of questions (98) as the
2000 and 2003 OMB-approved survey instrument. The only changes made to
the 2000 questionnaire for the 2004 to 2006 reporting cycles were as
follows: minor grammatical changes or revised wording to clarify the
question for the respondent and the addition of checkable boxes to
reflect additional choices where respondents previously were required to
type in answers under an “Other (please specify)” category. The
addition of new answer boxes was made after an analysis of the state
responses from 2001 to 2003. New boxes were added only when five or more
states provided the same response in the “Other (please specify)”
category. The minor rewording of the 2004 to 2006 survey instrument
included questions and answers changes. Minor changes to the questions
were made in 2003 to provide clarification of the question, and changes
to the answer categories were made to add selections that could be
easily checked by the respondents, thereby removing the need for
respondents to key in lengthier answers.

The current NLFA survey questionnaire for the 2010 to 2012 cycles
collects quantitative advisory information on the number of new
advisories issued by each state, territory, and Tribal organization
annually using the same basic survey questionnaire that was developed in
2000 (with only minor rewording), including information on the

Waterbody under advisory, including the geographic location and extent
of the advisory

Fish or shellfish species (and size ranges) included in each advisory

Chemical contaminant(s) identified in the advisory and the chemical
residue levels detected in various fish species sampled

Waterbody type encompassed by advisory (e.g., lake, river, estuary,
coastal waters)

Target populations (e.g., general population, pregnant women, nursing
mothers, and young children) to which the advisory refers.

As in previous years, this information will be used to update the 2010,
2011, and 2012 NLFA narrative advisory information, compile and update
the geographic information system (GIS) database for all advisories, and
enhance and update the electronic fish tissue contaminant residue
datafile.

In addition, the State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire part of the
survey will request information on the

Differences in monitoring procedures used to collect fish and shellfish
samples

Types of advisories issued by the state

Sample preparation and chemical analysis procedures used to assess
chemical residues

State fish advisory program funding sources

Other uses of state fish advisory data

Risk assessment methodologies used to evaluate chemical residue data and
issue fish consumption advisories and bans

State efforts for targeting fish consumers (e.g., recreational and
subsistence fishers)

Risk management practices and authority for issuing fish advisories
within the state

Risk communication procedures used to communicate the human health risks
associated with the consumption of chemically contaminated fish and
shellfish species.

From this information, EPA can determine what steps to take, if any, to
provide assistance to state, territorial, and Tribal fish advisory
programs to improve consistency in fish advisory programs among entities
through the use of consistent sampling and analysis procedures and risk
assessment, risk management, and risk communication procedures. Note:
The current survey instrument proposed for use in the 2010 through 2012
reporting cycles is the same basic instrument that was developed for the
previous 2004 to 2006 and 2007 to 2009 reporting cycles.

EPA assembled the information collected under the previous Information
Collection request (ICR) into an electronic database and graphic formats
that can be readily analyzed and shared with responsible parties (e.g.,
EPA program and regional offices and other federal, state, territorial,
and Tribal agencies), as well as with the general public. Survey results
are distributed in Fish Advisory Fact Sheets and are available on the
Internet at EPA’s “National Listing of Fish Advisories” Web site
at
http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/fishshellfish/fishadvisories/adv
isories_index.cfm. Information from these surveys has stimulated
nationwide dialogue on fish consumption advisories involving agencies
and the public; it is being used to identify and clarify issues that
will lead to the continued development of national guidance for states
on sampling and analysis, risk assessment procedures, risk management
practices, and risk communication procedures that will further protect
human health.

The nationwide collection of fish advisory information began in 1994
with a survey of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S.
territories (Guam, American Samoa, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin
Islands) and the Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission,
involving a total of 56 potential respondents. In 2000, the fish
advisory survey added 36 Tribal agencies during the first year and will
continue to survey these same Tribal agencies, as well as the original
56 respondents over the 3-year period of this ICR (2011 to 2014); thus
the EPA estimates that up to 92 questionnaires will be sent out the
first year and in the two succeeding years. The actual cost for a
respondent to complete the questionnaire is anticipated to decrease each
year because each person will be requested to provide only information
that has changed during the preceding year. When the survey is
implemented, the total annual respondent cost under this ICR is
estimated to be $125,697.09 (36.26 hours per year at an average labor
rate of $37.52 per hour per respondent for 92 respondents).

2.	Need for and Use of the Collection

2(a)	Need/Authority for the Collection

EPA needs this information to determine whether recreational and
subsistence fishers are at additional risk of exposure to chemical
contaminants through their consumption of locally caught fish and
shellfish. The survey will provide data on the types of contaminants
that trigger the issuance of advisories, the monitoring designs the
states used with respect to the numbers of samples collected and number
of stations surveyed, the number of chemical contaminants being analyzed
in fish tissue, the risk assessment methodology currently being used to
evaluate the potential health risk to fish consumers, and how advisory
information is being communicated to the target fish-consuming
population.

This survey is one of the key actions under the Clean Water Action Plan.
In February 1998, the Clean Water Action Plan was initiated to protect
public health and restore the nation’s waters by providing states,
territories, and Tribes with appropriate tools and resources. Under the
Clean Water Action Plan, EPA is implementing a series of key actions to
ensure that recreational and subsistence caught fish are safe for human
consumption. The national survey is central to EPA’s efforts to assess
and improve existing fish advisory programs nationwide and to provide
important public health information.

EPA is collecting this information under the authority of CWA 104, which
provides for the collection of information to be used to protect human
health and the environment. Copies of the relevant section of the CWA
are provided in Appendix A.

2(b)	Practical Utility/Users of the Data

EPA uses information collected in the NLFA to address issues in three
specific areas for state fish advisory programs

Enhancing the public’s right-to-know about the safety of fish and
shellfish harvested from local waters by making this information
available on a NLFA database

Improving the scientific and policy foundation in support of state,
territorial, Tribal, and local actions

Providing up-to-date sampling and analysis methods, risk assessment,
risk management, and risk communication procedures for the states to use
to better protect the health of recreational and subsistence fishers in
a more timely and comprehensive manner.

The information collected in this survey will be used to update the
existing NLFA database. This information will be compiled to determine
the status and nature of chemical contamination in the nation’s
waters, the level of effort directed by jurisdictions to monitor and
evaluate fish tissue residue data at their monitoring sites, and the
location and geographic extent of the fish advisories and bans issued
each year. EPA will use the analysis to plan more effective research and
policies to reduce risks to consumers of locally caught, chemically
contaminated fish.

The Office of Water uses and will continue to use the information,
especially the state and national summary data, to examine the success
of current advisory programs. The Office of Water will share this
information with other program offices, such as the Office of Research
and Development and the Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation, to
evaluate scientific research needs and policy implications. EPA Regions
will use the information to address concerns regarding fish advisories
and monitoring programs. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
and other federal agencies will also be able to use this information.
The information compiled in this survey will permit state, Tribal, and
local agencies, such as public health agencies, environmental protection
agencies, and fish and wildlife departments, to easily review cumulative
information on monitoring programs and fish advisories for the purpose
of developing public information materials (e.g., state fish advisory
Web sites and/or fishing regulation brochures) and prioritizing
resources to address water quality concerns directly related to chemical
contamination of fish.

Summary and individual state data will also be made available to
non-governmental organizations and to the public. By accessing the data
through the Internet, the public will be able to readily determine
whether the waterbody they want to fish has been monitored to assess the
level of chemical contamination in the fish and whether an advisory or
ban has been issued. This will provide the consumers with information
that they can use to make informed decisions concerning the waterbodies
they fish in and the amount and types of fish they consume.

The information to be collected from all respondents includes the name,
address, and other contact information for the agency responsible for
issuing the fish advisories and answering public or technical inquiries.
These references provide a means for obtaining current fish advisory
information, as well as professional networking resources and referrals
for improving water quality at our nation’s fishable waterbodies. A
copy of the most recent fish advisory fact sheet distributed to the
public via the Internet is provided in Appendix B.

3.	Non-duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria

3(a)	Non-duplication

The fish advisory program information requested from respondents under
this renewal ICR has been collected in some form since 1994 and is not
currently available from any other sources. The survey of fish
advisories has been performed since 1994 under previously approved ICRs
for the 305(b) Water Quality Collection Effort (OMB Control No.
2040-007; EPA ICR No. 1560.03 and 1560.04); however, Tribal
organizations had not been comprehensively targeted by these surveys.
EPA examined the information collected from each of the previous surveys
and determined that none of them addressed all of its needs to inventory
the locations of the nation’s waterbodies under advisories, as well as
to compile nationwide information on state, territory, and Tribal fish
advisory programs.

In 2000, because the Office of Water wanted to obtain additional
information on fish advisories from the 50 states, the District of
Columbia, five U.S. territories, and additional Tribal groups, a new ICR
was submitted to OMB for approval to cover additional questions and
respondents not covered by the 305(b) Water Quality Collection Effort.
Since 2000, the survey of fish advisories has been performed under an
approved ICR for the National Listing of Advisories (OMB Control No.
2040-0226; EPA ICR No. 1959.01, expiring on 01/31/2004; EPA ICR No.
1959.02, expiring on 09/30/2007; EPA ICR No. 1959.03, expiring on
02/28/2011). A copy of these Federal Register notices is provided in
Appendix C.

EPA developed a new questionnaire in 2000, which was reviewed by fish
advisory contacts from nine states. To reduce respondent burden and
eliminate duplication, EPA worked to design concise and comprehensive
questions for the 2000 State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire. The
2003 questionnaire was modified only slightly for the survey effort to
be covered under the ICR for 2004–2006. The questionnaire has not been
modified for the survey effort to be covered under the current ICR for
2010–2012 reporting cycles. EPA anticipates no change in the
survey’s ability to meet the needs of the federal government and other
interested parties.

3(b)	Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB

This section will be completed after the Federal Register notice is
published.

3(c)	Consultations

(i)	Initial Federal Register Notice

To be completed upon publication of the first Federal Register notice.

(ii)	Questionnaire Preparation and Consultation

To prepare the survey for the collection effort covered under this
renewal ICR, EPA reviewed all questionnaires that had previously been
used to collect information for the 2007–2009 NLFA data collection
efforts, as well as respondent comments from these surveys. The results
were used to refine the questionnaire in order to encourage greater
respondent participation, and improve data analysis and interpretation.
The final survey for the 2010–2012 cycles is based on these reviews,
consultation with the states and Tribes at the 2000, 2001, 2002, 2004,
2005, 2007, and 2009 biennial EPA Fish Forums attended by state fish
advisory contacts, recent internal EPA discussions with various program
offices, and other considerations.

3(d) 	Effects of Less Frequent Collection

The survey will be sent to respondents once per year, in the early
spring. The information is needed annually to provide up-to-date
information on monitoring and fish advisories that occurred during the
previous 12-month (calendar year) fishing season. Pollution sources and
other circumstances change regularly, so it is important to document the
changes in fish advisories as soon as possible after the states’ issue
their yearly fishing regulations, including advisories, typically during
spring. Jurisdictions that are responsible for fish monitoring generally
collect fish each year during summer and fall, and then send the fish
tissue samples for analysis during fall and winter. Risk assessments are
conducted when residue analysis of the fish tissue samples have been
completed, typically in late winter.

Regular annual collections of this information over a period of several
years have shown that the number of fish advisories continues to
increase nationwide. In addition, this information has helped to
characterize the pollutants that triggered these advisories. For
example, as of 2008, mercury was the chemical contaminant responsible
for 80 percent of all advisories issued nationwide and five pollutants
(mercury, dioxins/furans, polychlorinated biphenyls [PCBs], chlordane,
and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane [DDT]) accounted for 97 percent of
the advisories issued. Regular annual collection of this information has
also permitted the identification of advisory trends within various
waterbodies so that trends can be identified and resources allocated to
deal with the most pressing problems. Less frequent or irregularly
scheduled reporting of advisory information is not sufficient to obtain
information for the purposes of this survey because longer periods
between reports or unequal periods of reporting would decrease the value
of the information obtained, and respondents might have more difficulty
in completing the survey if past yearly records were archived. In
addition, regular annual collection of this information over several
years will permit the evaluation of water quality standards compliance
and pollution problems occurring in waterbodies under advisory, so that
trends can be identified and resources allocated to deal with the
problems of greatest concern.

3(e)	General Guidelines

This survey adheres to OMB’s general guidelines for information
collection.

3(f) 	Confidentiality

Information sought is maintained for public record by the state public
health agency or other state agencies and no sensitive material is
involved.

3(g)	Sensitive Questions

No questions concerning sexual behavior or attitudes, religious beliefs,
or other matters usually considered private are included in this
information collection.

4.	The Respondents and the Information Requested

4(a)	Respondents/SIC Codes

The following categories of respondents will be surveyed:

State (or other entity) health departments

9431	Administration of public health programs (Administration of public
health programs, including the following: Categorical health program
administration—government, communicable disease program
administration—government, environmental health programs—government,
and public health agencies—non-operating).

State (or other entity) EPAs

9511	Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management (Administration
of Environmental Quality, including the following: Water control and
quality agencies—government and environmental protection
agencies—government).

4(b)	Information Requested

(i)	Data items, including record keeping

(1) Specific Information on Each Advisory or Ban Within the Jurisdiction
(records to be maintained by the jurisdiction for the public record at
least 2 years following completion of the survey each year that the
questionnaire is conducted)

Waterbody name, location, and narrative description of geographic extent
of advisory

Waterbody type (lake, river, estuary, coastal marine waters, Great Lakes
waters, multi-class, bayou, canal)

Chemical pollutant(s) detected in fish tissue samples that resulted in
issuance of the advisory

Date advisory was issued

Species of fish and size ranges sampled for which the advisory was
issued

Type of advisory issued and population that is targeted (no consumption
for the general population, no consumption for sensitive subpopulations,
such as pregnant or nursing women and children, restricted consumption
for the general population, restricted consumption for sensitive
subpopulation, or commercial fishing ban)

Tissue data that supports the advisory determination including
contaminant, residue concentration, type(s) of sample(s) (e.g., fillet,
whole, plug), and locational coordinates for the data/sample locations
(e.g., station IDs, site names, locations, counties,
latitude/longitude).

(2) General Information on State Fish Advisory Programs within the
Jurisdiction

Name, address, phone number, fax number, and e-mail address of
respondent (State fish advisory contact)

Agency or agencies with overall responsibility for fish advisories or
bans in the jurisdiction

Establishment of risk assessment procedures for issuing advisories

Monitoring and chemical analysis program implementation and costs

Advisory program implementation and costs

Agency responsibility for risk management and for issuing advisories or
bans

Public notification procedures for communicating information on
advisories and bans.

(3) Mapping the Location of Each Fish Consumption Advisory or Ban
(latitude/longitude coordinates for the advisory or hard copy of a
marked map that shows the location and extent of the advisory or
electronic shapefile/coverage of advisory locations)

A copy of the proposed survey instrument for the 2010 through 2012 NLFA
reporting cycles and the State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire is
included as Appendix D.

(ii)	Respondent Activities

The following activities are required for a respondent to assemble and
submit the above-mentioned data items:

Review transmittal email with instructions on what data should be
provided

Gather advisory data to update the NLFA database (including waterbody
name and geographic extent, fish species/size class, pollutant, and type
of advisory), and fish tissue residue data files

Gather geographic data by creating shapefiles/GIS coverages, providing
latitude/longitude coordinates, and/or by marking locations of current
fish advisories on electronic or hard copy maps

Review instructions and questions in the State Fish Advisory Program
Questionnaire (approximately 100 questions)

Gather information needed to complete all questions on the survey

Complete survey answers electronically by typing in information on an
electronic questionnaire

Return marked maps, shapefiles/GIS coverages showing advisory locations,
or listing of latitude/longitude coordinates, and fish tissue residue
data for new advisories by email or on diskette by mail to EPA.

5. 	The Information Collected–Agency Activities, Collection
Methodology, and Information Management

5(a)	Agency Activities

Agency activities associated with the collection of information by this
survey consist of the following:

Update current mailing list of all state, territory, and Tribal
organizations, and develop survey tracking database to track responses

Develop the transmittal letter, the State Fish Advisory Program
Questionnaire, instructions for completing updates to the NLFA database,
procedures for providing mapping/locational information, and recommended
fish tissue data format

Modify/populate the existing NLFA database with new fish advisory
information

Load the electronic questionnaire into a data entry tool

Record receipt of completed State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaires,
advisory revisions, marked map(s) or shapefiles/GIS coverages or
latitude/longitude files, and fish tissue residue data; submit reminders
to nonrespondents via e-mail and telephone calls; review State Fish
Advisory Program Questionnaires for completeness and correctness of
responses; review/verify advisory boundary markings on map(s); and
review and reformat fish tissue residue data files as appropriate

Enter appropriate geographic information on location of updated or new
advisories into GIS database, and review/verify data entries

Perform data analysis summaries of national and state advisory
information

Prepare an annual update of the Fish Advisory Fact Sheet and an annual
update of the State Fish Advisory Program Summary Report of information
obtained from the State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire

Distribute results of the advisory updates in the Fish Advisory Fact
Sheet electronically on the Internet and in hard copy reports to up to
92 state and Tribal participants and other interested members of the
general public (total of 200 copies)

Archive the State Fish Advisory Questionnaire responses, fish advisory
locational data (maps, shapefile/GIS coverages, or electronic
latitude/longitude files), and fish tissue residue data for at least 2
years.

5(b)	Collection Methodology and Management

To collect and analyze the information associated with this ICR, EPA
will primarily use an electronic questionnaire, paper maps, PCs, and
applicable database and digitizing software.

All potential state, territorial, or Tribal respondents in the mailing
list database will receive email requests to provide new advisory
information and complete the State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire.
The transmittal emails will explain the purpose of the NLFA update
survey and the State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire and provide
procedures to permit the respondents to complete the State Fish Advisory
Program Questionnaire electronically. Respondents will submit their fish
advisory data electronically to EPA for incorporation into the NLFA
database. However, at a minimum, each respondent is requested to return
the marked map or a shapefile/GIS coverage or latitude/longitude
coordinates of advisory locations and tissue residue data supporting the
issued advisories to EPA by email or on a diskette by mail. Email
reminders will be sent to respondents who have not returned their
advisory map(s), electronic shapefile/GIS coverage, electronic file of
tissue residue data, and updated fish advisory data; or have not
completed the electronic State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire
within 30 days.

EPA will ensure the accuracy and completeness of collected information
by reviewing each submission. Fish advisory data will be submitted
electronically to EPA for incorporation into the NLFA and data will not
be added to the existing database until approved by EPA. The State Fish
Advisory Questionnaire will be available electronically to be completed
by respondents. In the event that a state, territory, or Tribal agency
cannot access the questionnaire electronically, the survey will be
completed manually. Manual data entries will be double-checked to ensure
the accuracy and completeness of data entry. Data entries of survey
answers made electronically by respondents will also be reviewed to
ensure that all questions were completed. Tissue residue data will be
reviewed and reformatted into a Microsoft Access file as necessary to
make it compatible in structure with other state fish tissue residue
data in the NLFA tissue residue data repository.

Data analyses will be performed through queries and simple compilations
of summary statistics (e.g., number of fish advisories reported; number
of advisories issued for a specific chemical contaminant (e.g.,
mercury); number of advisories issued for the general population as
opposed to number of advisories issued to protect pregnant women,
nursing mothers, and children; or number of rivers, lakes, estuaries, or
coastal marine waters under advisory). Maps received from respondents
will be checked to determine whether instructions were followed and the
maps marked so that the information can be entered into a GIS database.
Back-up copies of the data will be made regularly during the survey and
maintained in a separate location for at least 2 years.

Summary results of the annual surveys will be posted on EPA’s NLFA Web
page. Individual state reports will be accessible by the public through
querying EPA’s Web page. Annual Fish Advisory Fact Sheets summarizing
the most current information on fish advisories will also be available
on the same Web site.

5(c)	Small Entity Flexibility

No alternatives have been found to be more cost effective than direct
solicitation of the state health departments or other state,
territorial, or Tribal entities responsible for issuing fish advisories
and that generate this information as a matter of public information for
distribution to their residents. No additional gathering of information
is required by the state health departments or other entities
responsible for each fish advisory because advisories and records are
their public health responsibilities. “Small Governmental
Jurisdictions” (defined for the purpose of this information collection
as a government or territories or Tribes having a population of less
than 50,000) may be included in this survey.

The completion of the survey (including the addition of updated advisory
information, marking maps, providing fish tissue residue data, and
completing the State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire) is voluntary.
Thus, smaller entities that cannot provide the staff and resources to
complete the survey are not required to do so. Identification of such
smaller entities that do not initially respond will permit the
development of options to assist the smaller entities in completing the
survey, such as permitting more time for responding, simplifying the
response procedures, or providing contractor assistance in completing
the survey. The option of completing the fish advisory survey and State
Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire electronically will be encouraged,
which should provide an easier and more effective means for transmitting
and receiving the information, provided the entities have email or
Internet access. Based on past experience with state health departments
and other state, territorial, and Tribal entities involved in issuing
fish advisories, the vast majority have email or Internet access.

5(d)	Collection Schedule

The survey materials will be available to the respondents in early
spring to obtain information on the previous year’s fish advisories,
sampling, and analysis programs, and risk assessment, risk management,
and risk communication procedures. If the completed survey materials
have not been returned within 30 days, then an e-mail reminder will be
sent to all nonrespondents. In addition, follow-up telephone calls will
be made to the nonrespondents to determine what, if any, assistance they
need to complete the questionnaire. If the completed survey materials
have not been returned within 60 days, the survey will be considered to
be unobtainable. Data will be analyzed, and summary advisory information
will be made available to the public by September each year.

6.	Estimating the Burden and the Cost of the Collection

6(a)	Estimating Respondent Burden

EPA reviewed burden estimates generated by an e-mailed inquiry of nine
state health departments in 2000 and made the following assumptions in
determining respondent burden based on responses obtained from four
states. (The annual respondent burden and cost presented in Table 1
reflects the estimated average annual labor hours and costs, calculated
to occur during the 3-year OMB-approved period of this ICR).

Labor hours are based on initial assumptions that up to 92 potential
respondents will be asked to participate in the survey annually. Thus,
the total number of surveys that might be processed during this ICR is
276 (3-year approval period).

Senior-level managers (e.g., director, chief) are most likely to receive
the survey materials and review instructions; however, it is anticipated
that a lower-level technical staff member would provide the new advisory
data electronically, copy fish residue data onto a diskette for mailing
to EPA, fill out the State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire
electronically, and mark the fish advisory locations on the maps,
provide shapefiles/GIS coverages or latitude/longitude coordinates.
Therefore, the average annualized respondent hour burden to review
instructions for the NLFA is 0.75 hours, as shown below.

	(0.25 hour–manager/year + 0.5 hour–technician/year) = 0.75 hours

The amount of time needed to gather advisory data to update the NLFA
varies considerably, depending on how many new fish advisories have been
issued within the jurisdiction during the past year and/or how many
revisions there are to previously issued advisories. For example, during
the 2003 cycle, 25 states reported no new advisories for the year, while
the 31 remaining states reported from 1 to 73 new advisories. However,
approximately 20 states also made revisions to existing advisory files.
Similar differences among the states in the number of new and revised
advisories reported have been observed over the past several years.
Because the amount of time needed to complete the new advisory
information or update existing information will vary depending on the
number of advisories within the respondent’s jurisdiction, a
respondent with one fish advisory might require 0.25 hours while a
respondent with 20 advisories might require 5 hours. The number of
respondents with “low” and “high” fish advisory reporting
burdens is unknown at this time. For the purposes of this ICR, EPA
estimates (based on the responses from four states), on the average,
that it will require 9.25 hours to complete the new advisory information
and revise existing data. Information requested is compiled by each
jurisdiction for the public record; hence little, if any, additional
time will be needed to gather the information. We estimate that 9.25
hours will be needed each year to gather the advisory information as
shown below.

(1.0 hour–manager/year + 6.25 hour–technician/year + 2.0
hour–clerical/year) = 9.25 hours

The amount of time needed to gather geographic data, develop
shapefiles/GIS coverages, determine latitude/longitude coordinates, or
manually mark locations of the advisories on a map also varies
considerably, depending on how many new fish advisories have been issued
within the jurisdiction during the past year. For example, during the
2003 cycle, 25 states reported no new advisories for the year while the
remaining states reported from 1 to 73 new advisories. Similar
differences among the states in the number of new advisories reported
have been observed over the past several years. Information requested is
compiled by each jurisdiction for the public record; hence little, if
any, additional time will be needed to gather the information. We
estimate (based on the responses from four states) that 7 hours will be
needed each year to gather the geographic data, create a shapefile/GIS
coverage, determine latitude/longitude coordinates, or mark advisory
locations on a map as shown below.

(0.5 hour–manager/year + 4.5 hour–technician/year + 2.0
hour–clerical/year) = 7.0 hours.

Respondents submitting their fish advisory data electronically will
require less clerical time than in the past for preparing and copying
advisory information. We estimate that 2.25 hours will be needed each
year to update advisory data as shown below.

(0.5 hour–manager/year + 1.25 hour–technician/year + 0.5
hour–clerical/year) = 2.25 hours

Senior-level managers (e.g., director, chief) are most likely to receive
the survey materials relating to the State Fish Advisory Program
Questionnaire; however, it is anticipated that a lower-level technical
staff member would actually complete the questionnaire electronically.
Thus, it is estimated that both the manager and the technical person
could spend 3.13 hours each year reviewing the instructions and
questions on the State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire; therefore,
the average annualized respondent hour burden to review instructions and
answer questions is 3.13 hours, as shown below.

	( 0.5 hour-manager/year + 2.63 hour-technician/year) = 3.13 hours

The amount of time needed to gather all information to update the State
Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire should be relatively comparable
across jurisdictions depending on how many state agencies are involved
in the fish advisory activities. All states are requested to complete
every question to their best knowledge. Information requested is
compiled by each jurisdiction for the public record, hence little, if
any, additional time will be needed to gather the information. We
estimate that 7.25 hours will be needed each year to gather the advisory
information needed to complete the State Fish Advisory Program
Questionnaire as shown below.

	(1.5 hour–manager/year + 5.75 hour–technician/year) = 7.25 hrs.

For the 2010 through 2012 survey reporting cycles, each state fish
contact will receive an electronic copy of the questionnaire with the
previous year’s answers filled in. In this way, respondents will only
need to report information that has changed during the previous
reporting period, based on a review of their questionnaire responses
submitted for the 2009 cycle. We estimate that 5.0 hours will be needed
each year to complete the answers to the State Fish Advisory Program
Questionnaire electronically as shown below.

	(4.25 hour–technician/year + 0.75 hour–clerical/year) = 5.0 hours

All respondents will likely have to mail back some types of information
to EPA each year even if they report the fish advisory data and complete
the State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire electronically. Products
that may need to be mailed back to EPA include hard copies of new
advisory information (if a respondent cannot enter data electronically),
hard copies of maps with advisories marked, or electronic shapefiles/GIS
coverages, or hard copy listings or electronic listings of
latitude/longitude coordinates (all respondents with new advisories), a
diskette containing fish tissue residue data that supports new
advisories (all respondents with new advisories), and/or the hard copy
of the State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire (if a respondent cannot
enter data electronically). Based on the responses from four states, we
estimate 1.63 hours will be needed to complete this activity as shown
below:

	(1.38 hour–technician/year + 0.25 hour–clerical/year) = 1.63 hours

6(b)	Estimating Respondent Costs

The following resources and assumptions were made to estimate respondent
costs for this information collection:

(i)	Estimating Labor Costs

Labor rates were obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’
Employment Cost Trends at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ecec.pdf,
and the following categories were used:

Manager (White collar: Executive, administrative,

and managerial)

$33.09/hour

Technical (White collar)

$23.24/hour

Clerical (Administrative support, including clerical)

$17.03/hour

A benefits/overhead multiplication factor of 1.6 was used to obtain the
total cost of employment for state (or other entity) respondents.

(ii)	Estimating Capital and Operations and Maintenance Costs

No capital/start-up costs are anticipated for the jurisdictions
participating in the survey because they already collect the information
requested for the public record. Ninety percent of all respondents who
were surveyed in 2002 (during the 2003 reporting cycle) have Internet
access; however, it is not required for participating in the survey.

The only operations and maintenance (O&M) cost required for this
information collection by the respondent is the purchase of a state map
(estimated to cost $5.00), which will be used to mark the advisories,
and a compact disk (estimated to cost $0.60), which will be used to
download his or her latitude/longitude coordinate data, shapefiles/GIS
coverages, or fish tissue residue data. Jurisdictions already maintain
the information requested in this collection for the public record. EPA
will provide return postage for the map, the tissue residue data
diskette, fish advisory information (as applicable), and the State Fish
Advisory Program Questionnaire (as applicable).  Currently, most
jurisdictions provide these data electronically via email.

EPA estimates that all respondents would submit the fish advisory survey
and the State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire electronically, but
anticipates all states, at a minimum, will be returning the marked up
state map showing advisory locations and one diskette containing
shapefile/GIS coverage, latitude/longitude coordinates, or tissue
residue data. We assume an average of five fish advisories per
jurisdiction and a 20-page questionnaire at $0.10 per page copying
charge ($2.50). This is based on the average number of new advisories
issued nationwide during the 2000–2002 reporting years.

(iii)	Capital/Start-up vs. Operating and Maintenance Costs

It is believed that the capital/start-up and O&M costs have been
appropriately derived for this information collection.

(iv)	Annualizing Capital Costs

No capital costs are anticipated for this information collection. The
electronic version of the NLFA survey and the State Fish Advisory
Program Questionnaire is offered as an option, not as a requirement.
Completion of either the electronic version or a paper version is
voluntary.

Table 1. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

Information Collection Activity	Hours and Costs Per Respondent

(Years 1-3)	Total Hours and Costs

(Year 1)	Total Hours and Costs

(Year 2)	Total Hours and Costs

(Year 3)

	Mgr. Hours at $33.09/ hour	Tech. Hours at $23.24/ Hour	Cler. Hours at
$17.03/ Hour	Resp. Hours	Labor Cost	Capital Start-Up Cost	O&M Cost	No.
of Resp.	Total Resp. Hours	Total Resp. Cost	No. of Resp.	Total Resp.
Hours	Total Resp. Cost	No. of Resp.	Total Resp. Hours	Total Respond.
Cost

Review instructions for new advisories	0.25	0.5	0.00	0.75	$31.83	$0.00
$0.00	92	69	$2,928.18	92	69	$2,928.18	92	69	$2,928.18

Gather advisory data including fish tissue data	1.00	6.25	2.00	9.25
$339.84	$0.00	$0.60	92	851	$31,320.48	92	851	$31,320.48	92	851
$31,320.48

Gather geographic information and mark maps	0.50	4.50	2.00	7.00	$248.30
$0.00	$5.00	92	644	$23,303.23	92	644	$23,303.23	92	644	$23,303.23

Enter advisory data electronically or via paper copy	0.50	1.25	0.5	2.25
$86.58	$0.00	$0.00	92	207	$7,969.49	92	207	$9,969.49	92	207	$7,969.49

	 	 	9	 	 	9

Review instructions and questionnaire questions	0.50	2.63	0.00	3.13
$124.27	$0.00	$0.00	92	287.96	$11,432.46	92	287.96	$11,432.46	92	287.96
$11,432.46

Gather information for questionnaire	1.50	5.75	0.00	7.25	$293.22	$0.00
$0.00	92	667	$26,976.61	92	667	$26,976.61	92	667	$26,976.61

Enter answers to questionnaire electronically or on paper	0.00	4.25	0.75
5.00	$178.47	$0.00	$0.00	92	460	$16,419.06	92	460	$16,419.06	92	460
$16,419.06

Return maps, residue data, diskette, advisory information and
questionnaire by mail	0.00	1.38	0.25	1.63	$58.13	$0.00	$0.00	92	149.96
$5,347.58	92	149.96	$5,347.58	92	149.96	$5,347.58

Subtotals	4.25	26.51	5.50	36.26	$1,360.62	$0.00	$5.60	varies	3,335.92
$125,697.09	varies	3,335.92	$125,697.09	varies	3,335.92	$125,697.09

1	Labor cost includes a benefits/overhead multiplication factor of 1.6.

6(c)	Estimating Agency Burden and Cost

Agency burden is estimated based on the assumption that 10 percent of
the labor hours per year for each activity will be work done by EPA and
90 percent of the labor hours per year will be work done by a
contractor. In addition, management oversight of work performed by
technical and clerical staff is estimated to require 20 percent of the
labor hours for each activity.

Federal employee rates were obtained from the 2010 OPM General Schedule
(GS) Salary Table for the Washington, DC, area for the midpoint of each
salary grade (Available at the Web site
http://www.opm.gov/oca/10tables/pdf/dcb_h.pdf), and the following
categories were used:

Manager (GS 15)

$67.21/hour

Technical (GS 14)

$57.13/hour

Clerical (GS 7)

$22.92/hour

A benefits/overhead multiplication factor of 1.6 was used to obtain the
total labor cost for EPA.

No capital/startup costs are anticipated for the Agency.

O&M costs include costs of contractor services (including printing
survey materials and computer time) and outgoing and return postage for
each survey to return map(s) and/or survey and/or State Fish Advisory
Program Questionnaires each year.

Table 2 includes the estimated costs for each year of the ICR period.
The following resources and assumptions were used to prepare the burden
estimate for each activity:

Preparation of the mailing list and survey tracking database is
estimated based on initial assumptions that up to 92 potential
respondents nationwide will be sent the survey each year. Agency labor
includes identifying potential respondents and sources for contact
information (name, agency, address, phone number, fax number, and e-mail
address) and is estimated to take 0.04 hours per respondent. O&M costs
include contractor services to revise the mailing list and the survey
and questionnaire tracking database, and enter and verify contact
information, based on approximately 0.2 hours per respondent, with an
estimated rate of $95.00/hour (labor, overhead, and other direct costs).
Agency labor and contractor service estimates are based on an estimated
100 edits to the respondent contact names and addresses annually. It is
not likely that the number of respondents will change significantly
after the first year because all state, territorial, and Tribal
organizations will be identified and contacted for the first mailing.
Because the contact information will likely only need to be entered
once, the Agency labor and contractor services are divided by three to
provide an annualized estimate for the ICR.

To revise the existing 2009 survey package including the transmittal
email, survey, instructions, and mapping procedures requires an
estimated number of Agency hours of 0.11 hours per respondent. Fixed O&M
costs include 40 contractor hours per year to modify survey materials.

The NLFA database for storing and analyzing the fish advisory
information is already in place. Agency labor for this activity is
estimated at 0.02 hours per respondent. Fixed O&M costs include 80
contractor hours per year to modify this database.

Each year, the Agency will submit the survey materials to respondents.
(The materials to be submitted will include a request for information on
advisories that have been issued or revised during the preceding 12
months, map(s) and fish tissue residue data only need to be submitted
for the new advisories issued during the previous year, and the previous
year’s State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire with the request that
responses be updated to reflect information that has changed during the
preceding calendar year. EPA’s oversight of this activity is estimated
to be 0.02 hours per respondent. Contractor services required to conduct
this activity include 0.25 hours per respondent per year to prepare the
materials and answer respondents’ questions about the survey. O&M
costs also include outgoing and return postage paid by the Agency ($2.00
per survey x 2 = $4.00 per year).

Survey operations include recording receipt of completed questionnaires
and marked map(s), electronic shape files/GIS coverages, and electronic
fish tissue residue files; sending e-mail reminders to nonrespondents
and making telephone contacts with nonrespondents and respondents in
situations where additional information is required for clarification,
if needed; e-mailing acknowledgment of materials that are received; and
reviewing survey materials for completeness and accuracy of responses.
EPA estimates that it will not be involved in these operations except
for minor oversight (0.02 hours per respondent per year). Contractor
services to perform these operations are based on 1 hour per respondent
per year.

EPA expects that the new fish advisory data and State Fish Advisory
Program Questionnaires will be provided electronically by respondents.
Fish tissue residue data from all states will have to be reviewed and
reformatted for uploading to the fish tissue database, and all data
entries (fish advisory, mapping, fish tissue residue data, and State
Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire responses) will have to be entered
into the database and reviewed and verified. EPA estimates that it will
not be involved in these operations except for minor oversight (0.03
hours per respondent per year). Contractor services to enter data for
those respondents are expected to be 3 hours per respondent per year.
Contractor services to reformat fish tissue data files for all
respondents are expected to be 6 hours per respondent per year and
contractor services for reviewing/revising all fish advisory data,
mapping data, State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaires, and fish
tissue data are estimated to be 2 hours per respondent.

Data analysis of new and updated advisory information and state fish
advisory program information will be performed to obtain summary
statistics for inclusion in the Fish Advisory Fact Sheet and the annual
State Fish Advisory Program Summary Report, respectively. The Agency
will provide technical direction to a contractor to perform the analyses
and discuss and review the results, estimated at 0.06 hours per
respondent per year. Contractor services will require 0.5 hours per
respondent per year for analysis.

EPA will prepare a summary report of fish advisory information (Fish
Advisory Fact Sheet) and a summary report of information obtained from
the survey (State Fish Advisory Program Summary Report). EPA will
provide technical direction to a contractor to prepare both the fact
sheet and the summary report, including reviewing drafts and the final
fact sheet and report, which is estimated at 0.55 hours per respondent
per year. It is anticipated that the contractor will require 2 hours per
respondent per year to produce the fact sheet and summary report,
including a hard copy and an electronic version of each suitable for
posting on the NLFA Web site.

EPA will distribute the summary results of the NLFA database (Fish
Advisory Fact Sheet) in an electronic version that will be posted on the
NLFA Web site. EPA also will provide technical oversight of the
publication process, estimated at 0.05 hours per respondent per year.
Fixed O&M costs include estimated Government Printing Office costs of
$50 per paper report (approximately 500 pages) x 200 copies plus
postage of $4.30 per copy x 200 copies (total = $10,860). The Internet
version of the NLFA database containing the Fish Advisory Fact Sheet and
the updated fish advisory data will be designed so that the states,
territories, Tribes, and the general public can automatically view the
fish advisory information pertaining to the waterbody of interest. O&M
costs also include funds for contractor services to maintain the
database and perform troubleshooting, if needed, estimated at $5,000 per
year.

Table 2. Agency Burden and Cost

Information Collection Activity	Hours Burden and Cost (Year 1)	Total
Hours and Costs

	Mgr. Hours at $67.21/ Hour	Tech Hours at $57.13/ Hour	Clerical Hours at
$22.92/ Hour	Agency Hours/ Resp.	Labor Cost/Resp.	Capital/ Start-Up Cost
Fixed O&M Cost	Non_Fixed O&M Cost1	Number of Resp.	Total O&M (fixed and
non-fixed)	Total Agency Hours	Total Agency Cost

Prepare mailing list and survey tracking database	0.01	0.02	0.01	0.04
$3.27	$0.00 	$0.00 	$19.00 	92	$1,748.00 	3.68 	$2,048.86

Revise survey materials	0.01	0.1	0	0.11	$10.22	$0.00 	$3,800.00 	$0.00
92	$3,800.00 	10.12 	$4,739.89

Set up database for storing and tracking questionnaire responses and
electronic options for answering the questionnaire	0.02	0	0	0.02	$2.15
$0.00 	$7,600.00 	$0.00 	92	$7,600.00 	1.84 	$7,797.87

Submit survey materials to respondents; answer respondents’ questions
0.01	0.01	0	0.02	$1.99	$0.00 	$0.00 	$27.75 	92	$2,553.00 	1.84
$2,736.03

Record receipt of completed survey materials; perform follow-up and
quality control activities	0.01	0.01	0	0.02	$1.99	$0.00 	$0.00 	$95.00
92	$8,740.00 	1.84 	$8,923.03

Enter information from survey materials into database, if needed,
reformat tissue data and review/verify data entries	0	0.03	0	0.03	$2.74
$0.00 	$0.00 	$285.00 	92	$26,220.00 	2.76 	$92,392.29

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	$570.00 	92	$52,440.00

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	$190.00 	92	$17,480.00

	Perform data analysis	0.01	0.05	0	0.06	$5.65	$0.00 	$0.00 	$47.50 	92
$4,370.00 	5.52 	$4,889.41

Prepare fact sheet and summary report of information obtained from the
survey	0.05	0.5	0	0.55	$51.08	$0.00 	$0.00 	$190.00 	92	$17,480.00
50.60 	$22,179.43

Distribute results of the survey	0	0.05	0	0.05	$4.57	$0.00 	$15,860.00
$0.00 	92	$15,860.00 	4.60 	$16,280.48

Store the advisory data, questionnaire responses and advisory location
data	0	0.03	0.03	0.06	$3.84	$0.00 	$1,000.00 	$0.00 	92	$1,000.00 	5.52
$1,353.50

Subtotals	0.12	0.8	0.04	0.96	$87.50	$0.00 	$28,260.00 	$1,424.25 	Varies
$159,291 	88.32 	$167,230.57

1 	Includes costs of contractor services and postage.

	Data obtained from the NLFA survey, including mapping and fish tissue
residue data, and State Fish Advisory Program Questionnaire, will be
stored in appropriate media. EPA will provide technical oversight to
ensure that data storage meets its requirements and program objectives.
Labor is estimated at 0.06 hours per respondent per year. Fixed O&M
costs include an estimate for computer equipment maintenance for this
program of $1,000 per year.

6(d)	Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

The respondent universe for this ICR is calculated based on a total
number of 276 surveys to be completed during the 3-year ICR period for
an average of up to 92 respondents (representing fish advisory contacts
from 50 states, District of Columbia, five U.S. territories and 36
Native American Tribes). The number of respondents involved in each
activity varies. It is anticipated that 90 percent of respondents will
exercise that option.

6(e)	Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables

(i)	Respondent Tally

Only one respondent table was prepared for this ICR.

Total Estimated Respondent Burden and Cost Summary

Technical and Financial Requirements	Number of Respondents	Number of
Activities	Total Hours	Total Labor Cost	Total Capital Costs	Total O&M
Costs	Total Costs

Year 1	92	8	3,335.92	$125,177.39 	$0.00	$519.70	$125,697.09

Year 2	92	8	3,335.92	$125,177.39 	$0.00	$519.70	$125,697.09

Year 3	92	8	3,335.92	$125,177.39	$0.00	$519.70	$125,697.09

TOTAL	276	24	10,007.76	$375,532.17	$0.00	$1,559.10	$377,091.28

AVERAGE	92	8	3,335.92	$125,177.39 	$0.00	$519.70	$125,697.09

(ii)	The Agency Tally

The Agency and contractor tables are summarized in the following table.

Total Estimated Agency Burden and Cost Summary

Technical and Financial Requirements	Number of Respondents	Number of
Activities	Total Hours	Total Labor Cost	Total Capital Costs	Total O&M
Costs	Total Costs

Year 1	92	10	88.32	$8,049.78	$0.00	$159,291.00	$167,340.78

Year 2	92	10	88.32	$8,049.78	$0.00	$159,291.00	$167,340.78

Year 3	92	10	88.32	$8,049.78	$0.00	$159,291.00	$167,340.78

TOTAL	276	30	264.96	$24,149.34	$0.00	$477,873.00	$502,022.34

AVERAGE	92	10	88.32	$8,049.78	$0.00	$159,291.00	$167,340.78

(iii)	Variations in the Annual Bottom Line

No change in collection activities or burden and costs per respondent is
anticipated during the course of this ICR.

6(f)	Reasons for Change in Burden

There is a decrease of 229 hours in the total estimated respondent
burden compared with that identified in the ICR currently approved by
OMB. This decrease reflects a change in how the states, tribes and
territories provide the fish advisory data to EPA. The data tool is no
longer being used by states to enter data into the NLFA database.

6(g)	Burden Statement

The annual public reporting and record keeping burden for this
collection of information is estimated to average 36.26 hours per
respondent. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Tribal or federal agency. This includes
the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and
utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting,
validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining
information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and
requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of
information requirement; search data sources; complete and review the
collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. These numbers for EPA’s
regulations are listed in 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.

To comment on EPA’s need for this information, the accuracy of the
provided burden estimates and any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques,
EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OW-2007-0201, which is available for public viewing at the Water
Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460. The EPA Docket Center
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading
Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the Water Docket
and is<PHONE_NUMBER>. An electronic version of the public docket is
available online for viewing at  http://www.regulations.gov. Use
http://www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once
in the system, select “search,” then type in the docket ID number
identified above. Also, you can send comments to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Office for EPA.
Please include EPA Docket ID (EPA-HQ-OW-2007-0201) and OMB Control
Number (2040-0226) in any correspondence.

Information Collection Request

  PAGE  i

Information Collection Request

  PAGE  22


[Federal Register: February 14, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 30)]
[Notices]
[Page 7753-7754]
[DOCID:fr14fe06-43]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-206-000]

Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Petition for Limited
Waiver

February 6, 2006.
    Take notice that on February 1, 2006, Northern Border Pipeline
Company (Northern Border) tendered for filing a petition for a limited
waiver of subsection 36.1 of the general terms and conditions in its
FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated
below. Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or
protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve
motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.

    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: February 14, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-2025 Filed 2-13-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P