[Federal Register: September 16, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 179)]
[Notices]
[Page 56528-56529]
[DOCID:fr16se10-48]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0768; FRL-8847-1]

EPA's Role in Advancing Sustainable Products

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is interested in soliciting individual stakeholder input
regarding the Agency's role in the ``green'' or sustainable products
movement. The Agency will consider the information gathered from this
notice and other sources as it works to define its role and develop a
strategy that identifies how EPA can make a meaningful contribution to
the development, manufacture, designation, and use of sustainable
products.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 19, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0768, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: OPPT Document Control Office (DCO), EPA
East Bldg., Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC.
Attention: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0768. The DCO is open from
8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the DCO is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the DCO's normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-
2010-0768. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPPT Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) at Rm. 3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room hours of operation
are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding

legal holidays. The telephone number of the EPA/DC Public Reading Room
is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is
(202) 566-0280. Docket visitors are required to show photographic
identification, pass through a metal detector, and sign the EPA visitor
log. All visitor bags are processed through an X-ray machine and
subject to search. Visitors will be provided an EPA/DC badge that must
be visible at all times in the building and returned upon departure.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For technical information contact: Thomas Tillman, Pollution
Prevention Division Mail Code (7409M), Office Pollution Prevention and
Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For general information contact: The Pollution Prevention
Information Clearinghouse (7409M), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture,
distribute, label, certify, verify, and purchase or use consumer,
commercial, or industrial products that may be considered as ``green,''
``sustainable,'' or ``environmentally preferable.'' Potentially
affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Manufacturing (NAICS codes 31-33).
     Construction (NAICS code 23).
     Wholesale trade (NAICS code 42).
     Retail trade (NAICS codes 44-45).
     Professional, scientific and technical services (NAICS
code 54).
     Accommodations and food services (NAICS code 72).
     Other services, except public administration (NAICS code
81).
     Public administration (NAICS code 92).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. Background

A. What action is the Agency taking?

    EPA is interested in soliciting individual stakeholder input
regarding the Agency's role in the ``green'' or sustainable products
movement. The Agency will consider the information gathered from this
notice and other sources as it works to define its role and develop a
strategy that identifies how EPA can make a meaningful contribution to
the development, manufacture, designation, and use of sustainable
products.
    More specifically, EPA would appreciate your individual views
regarding the following types of questions:
    1. What do you see as the major policy and research challenges,
opportunities, and trends impacting the development, manufacture,
designation, and use of sustainable products?
    2. What do you see as EPA's overall role in addressing these
challenges and opportunities?
    3. In particular, how do you see EPA's role in:
     Assembling information and databases.
     Identifying sustainability ``hotspots'' and setting
product sustainability priorities.
     Evaluating the multiple impacts of products across their
entire life cycle.
     Defining criteria for more sustainable products.
     Generating eco-labels and/or standards.
     Establishing the scientific foundation for these eco-
labels and/or standards.
     Verifying that products meet standards.
     Stimulating the market.
     Developing end-of-life management systems (reuse,
recycling, etc.).
     Measuring results, evaluating programs.

B. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?

    Section 13103(b) of the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 requires
the Administrator of EPA to facilitate the adoption of source reduction
techniques by businesses and to identify opportunities to use Federal
procurement to encourage source reduction.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, environmentally preferable products,
green products, procurement, sustainable products.

    Dated: September 10, 2010.
Wendy Cleland-Hamnett,
Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2010-23123 Filed 9-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Significant New Alternatives Policy Program

Fire Extinguishing and Explosion Prevention Sector

Risk Screen on Substitutes for Halon 1301

Total Flooding Systems in Normally Occupied or Unoccupied Spaces

Substitute: N2 Towers Inert Gas Generator Fire Suppression System

This risk screen does not contain Clean Air Act (CAA) Confidential
Business Information (CBI) and, therefore, may be disclosed to the
public.

1. 	Introduction

Ozone-depleting substances (ODS) are being phased out of production in
response to a series of diplomatic and legislative efforts that have
taken place over the past decade, including the Montreal Protocol and
the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA).  The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), as authorized by Section 612 of the CAAA, runs
the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program, which identifies
acceptable and unacceptable substitutes for ODS in specific end-uses
based on assessment of their health and environmental impacts.

EPA’s decision on the acceptability of a substitute is based largely
on the findings of a screening assessment of potential human health and
environmental risks posed by the substitute in specific applications.
EPA has already screened a large number of substitutes in many end–use
applications within all of the major ODS-using sectors, including
refrigeration and air conditioning, solvent cleaning, foam blowing,
aerosols, fire suppression, adhesives, coatings and inks, and
sterilization.  The results of these risk screens are presented in a
series of Background Documents that are available in EPA's docket.

The purpose of this risk screen is to supplement EPA’s Background
Document on the fire suppression and explosion protection sector (EPA
1994) (hereinafter referred to as the Background Document). This risk
screen discusses potential human health and environmental risks posed by
the N2 Towers Inert Gas Generator Fire Suppression System (N2 Towers
System) when used as a total flooding agent in normally occupied or
unoccupied spaces as a replacement for Halon 1301.

The N2 Towers System is an inert gas system designed for total flooding
applications for fires in normally occupied or unoccupied spaces.  The
nitrogen gas generating propellant grains are formed into purple-colored
discs, each with a diameter of 39 mm and a height of 15 mm.  Each disc
contains 19 perforations, with an inside diameter of 2.5 mm. Each
ten-inch N2 generator unit contains 96 propellant grain discs in a total
of 14 layers: seven discs per layer for the 12 middle layers and six
discs per layer for the top and bottom layers. Depending on the fire
suppression requirement, several generators may be stacked inside an N2
Tower in a room, or a single generator may be bracketed inside an
armored vehicle.

Upon activation, the substitute undergoes the following chemical
reaction:

→ 2Na2O.FeO + 6N2

The nitrogen is discharged into the space and the remainder of the
activation products are filtered and contained inside the N2 generator,
where moisture is absorbed from the ambient air, neutralizing the sodium
hydroxide until all that is left inside the generator is a burnt
propellant sinter. The sinter is contained within the filter inside the
sealed N2 generator until the entire unit is disposed of at an
appropriate disposal facility.  The largest N2 generator, 24” long by
7” in diameter, can discharge up to 6.9 pounds of nitrogen gas in
approximately 100 milliseconds. The submitter will use this size for the
existing stockpile of grains. Each 24” long by 6” diameter generator
can protect up to 400 cubic feet of volume, and multiple generators may
be combined to protect a single space (N2 Towers Inc., 2009, 2010a,
2010b).

Table 1 provides the composition of propellant grains contained in N2
Tower Systems, prior to activation.

Table 1.  Composition of N2 Towers

Component	Chemical Formula	CAS No.	Weight Percent

Sodium Azide (s)	NaN3	26628-22-8	50-70

Ferric Oxide	Fe2O3	1309-37-1	20-35

Graphite	C	7782-42-5	2-7

Bentonite	Al2O3.4(SiO2).H2O	1302-78-9	0-5

Sodium Nitrate	NaNO3	7631-9-4	0-5

Potassium Perchlorate	KClO4	7778-74-7	0-3

Amorphous Silica	SiO2	112926-00-8	0-2

Source: N2 Towers Inc. (2009)

Section 2 of this risk screen summarizes the results of the risk screen
for the proposed substitutes listed in Table 1.  The remainder of the
risk screen is organized into the following sections:

Section 3: Atmospheric Assessment;

Section 4: Occupational Exposure Assessment;

Section 5: End-Use Exposure Assessment;

Section 6: General Population Exposure Assessment;

Section 7: Volatile Organic Compound Assessment; and

Section 8: References.

2.	Summary of Results

The N2 Towers System is recommended for SNAP approval as a total
flooding device in normally occupied or unoccupied spaces for fire
suppression.  EPA recommends that Section VIII of the Occupational
Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) Technical Manual be consulted for
information on selecting the appropriate types of Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE) recommended (OSHA 1999).  The risk screen indicates that
the use of the proposed substitute in normally occupied or unoccupied
spaces will be less harmful to the atmosphere than the continued use of
Halon 1301.  Additionally, the risk to the general population is
expected to be below levels of concern for non-cancer risks.  For
applications of this and all other water mist/inert gas fire suppression
equipment, EPA recommends that the latest editions of National Fire
Protection Agency (NFPA) Standards 750 and 2001 be followed.

3. 	Atmospheric Assessment

This section presents an assessment of the potential risks to
atmospheric integrity posed by the use of the N2 Towers System as a
total flooding system in normally occupied or unoccupied areas. The
constituents of N2 Towers Systems are solids before use and therefore
have zero ozone depleting potential (ODP) and global warming potential
(GWP) Further, as indicated in Table 2, the ODP of each of the
post-activation constituents of N2 Towers is zero and most of the
post-activation constituents also have zero GWP. The GWP and ODP of the
compounds in N2 Towers are well below the GWPs of previously
SNAP-approved fire-suppression agents (e.g. HFCs and other high-GWP
fluids).  Accordingly, use of the N2 Towers System is not expected to
pose any significant adverse atmospheric impacts.

Table 2.  ODP and 100-Year GWP of the N2 Towers System Constituents

Constituent	ODP	100-Year GWP

N2	0	0

CO	0	3a

CO2	0	1

aBased on indirect radiative effects, Fuglestvedt et al. (1996)

4.	Occupational Exposure Assessment

The potential for personnel exposure during manufacture, installation,
and maintenance are examined in this section.  According to information
provided in the N2 Towers SNAP application, all N2 Tower Systems will be
fabricated using an existing stockpile of TRW sodium azide propellant
grains. The stockpile of grains is stored in an airtight moisture proof
bag made of aluminum foil and are not opened until they are placed
inside the N2 generator. Thus, any exposure during manufacture will be
limited to propellant grain loading into the N2 generator. According to
the submitter, all loading of the grains will be performed using a down
draft loading table. Due to the inhalation, oral and dermal toxicity of
sodium azide, all employees involved in propellant loading should wear
appropriate PPE, such as protective clothing, gloves, goggles, and
respiratory protection, as described in the compound’s MSDS.  It is
expected that level B of the levels of protection presented in the OSHA
Technical Manual (OSHA 1999) will afford the appropriate protection. In
the case of an accidental spill, workers should immediately vacate the
premises and follow the first aid guidelines listed in the MSDS.

Because of the minimal chance of worker exposure to the chemicals during
the manufacturing process, the use of these exposure controls and
adherence to the appropriate occupational safety guidelines as mentioned
above, are sufficient to ensure that the manufacture of N2 Towers
Systems does not pose a risk to human health.

During installation or maintenance of an N2 Towers System, inadvertent
discharge of the substitute may occur.  According to the submitter,
during installation and maintenance, no exposures to the propellant are
expected to occur as the generator body is a sealed steel casing with
propellant grains contained therein.  However, in the event of
inadvertent discharge, oxygen concentration would be expected to decline
over time.  To ensure that exposures are minimized, it is recommended
that N2 Towers Systems provide safety training for technicians to
minimize the occurrence of an inadvertent discharge.  Training should
also be provided regarding egress from the space should such a discharge
occur.

5.	End-Use Exposure Assessment

The primary health concern for agents containing or releasing inert
gases, including nitrogen gas, is asphyxiation due to reduced oxygen
concentrations. To determine whether asphyxiation could occur at the
end-use, the N2 Towers System design parameters were analyzed.  N2
Towers Inc. conducted fire suppression tests to measure the oxygen,
carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and particulates concentrations at the
time of flame suppression Table 3 presents the calculated design
concentrations based on the results of N2 Towers’ fire testing and a
conservative estimate provided by the submitter. To determine the
minimum design concentration for the N2 Towers System, a 30 percent
safety factor was applied to the extinguishing concentrations, in
accordance with NFPA 2001 Guidelines (NFPA, 2007).

Table 3.  Summary of N2 Towers Inc.’s Fire Tests and Calculated
Minimum Design Concentrations

Test	Extinguishing Concentrationa

Design Concentration (% N2/% air (v/v))c,d

	% O2 /% air (v/v)	% N2 /% air (v/v)c 	% CO/% air (v/v)b

	1	16.2 b	22.7	215.6	29.5

3	16.0 b	23.6	288	30.7

4	15.8 b	24.6	299	32.0

5	15.8 b	24.6	339	32.0

NAe	14.5e	30.8	NA	40.0

a Source: N2 Towers Inc. (2009 and 2010b).

b O2 and CO levels are experimentally measured.

c N2 levels are calculated based on experimentally measured O2 levels.
These values are exclusive of atmospheric nitrogen, i.e. represent the
concentration of nitrogen from the N2 Towers System only in the air.

d Design concentrations were estimated by applying a 30 percent safety
factor to the extinguishing concentrations

e O2 level provided by submitter as a conservative estimate.

According to the submitter, the N2 Towers System creates wind vorticity
and lowers the oxygen levels of a space down to approximately 14.5 %
oxygen per volume. Based on the conservative estimate of oxygen levels,
the nitrogen extinguishing concentration was calculated to be 30.8
percent and the design concentration to be 40.0 percent.

Because N2 Towers Systems are designed to ensure that the oxygen
concentration in any protected space will not fall below 12 percent over
the discharge period, N2 Towers is considered safe for fires in normally
occupied or normally unoccupied spaces for inert gases.

6. 	General Population Exposure Assessment

Given the large natural quantities of nitrogen and water in the
atmosphere, it is unlikely that an accidental release of N2 Towers will
affect the average atmospheric concentrations of these gases.  As such,
N2 Towers is not believed to pose a toxicity threat to the general
population.

7.        Volatile Organic Compound Assessment

The constituents of the N2 Towers are not considered VOCs for purposes
of local air quality.

8.	References

EPA.  1994. Risk Screen on the Use of Substitutes for Class I
Ozone-Depleting Substances: Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection
(Halon Substitutes).  Stratospheric Protection Division.  March 1994.

Fuglestvedt, J.S., I.S.A. Isaksen and W.-C. Wang, 1996: Estimates of
indirect global warming potentials for CH4, CO, and NOx. Clim. Change,
34, 405-437.

N2 Towers, Inc. 2009.  SNAP Submission to EPA for N2 Towers.  December
22, 2009.

N2 Towers, Inc. 2010a.   HYPERLINK "http://n2towers.com/"
http://n2towers.com/  Accessed March 22, 2010.

N2 Towers, Inc. 2010b. Response to Incomplete SNAP Submission for N2
Towers. March 10, 2010.

NFPA, 2007. NFPA 2001: Standard on Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing
Systems.  2008 Edition.  Available at:   HYPERLINK
"http://www.nfpa.org/freecodes/free_access_document.asp"
http://www.nfpa.org/freecodes/free_access_document.asp

OSHA.  1999.  OSHA Technical Manual.  Department of Labor.  Occupational
Safety & Health Administration.  January 20, 1999.  Available online at:
  HYPERLINK "http://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/otm_toc.html"
http://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/otm_toc.html

 In evaluating the occupation exposures during manufacture, this risk
screen is limited to the existing stockpile of propellant grains that
have already been manufactured. According to the submitter, the quantity
of propellant grains in the existing stockpile can be used to
manufacture approximately 20,000 N2 generators. Any future manufacture
of N2 Towers Systems which requires production/manufacture of propellant
grains will require additional EPA screening for approval under the SNAP
program.

Þ

Þ

摧ⱰÖ܀-␃愁Ĥ摧枑ïЀ摧㽘mЀ 摧㽘mЀ 摧䐲÷ༀÞ

ß

gd²

ht

ht

h²

ht

h²

 h

h²

ò

ò

ò

kdp

	”

ò

ht

 h²

h²

 h²

h²

h²

h²

h²

h²

h²

 h²

h²

 h²

h²

h²

h²

옍)

옍)

enerators by UTeC technicians. Once loaded, end caps are sealed and
screwed into place on the N2 generators. After sealing, the generator is
safe for storage and shipping (N2 Towers, Inc. 2010b)

September 20, 2011

  PAGE  1


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 201 (Friday, October 16, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65798-65799]
[FR Doc No: 2020-22934]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL17-92-000]

East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on October 8, 2020, East Texas Electric
Cooperative, Inc. submitted a Supplement to the September 20, 2017
application for cost-based revenue requirements schedule for reactive
power production capability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, The Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to Commission's Public Reference
Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency concerning
the Novel

Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the President on March 13,
2020. For assistance, contact FERC at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on October 29, 2020.

    Dated: October 9, 2020.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-22934 Filed 10-15-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 12 (Friday, January 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 3261]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00834]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-71218; File No. SR-CME-2013-24]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc.;
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Regarding the Designation of a
Primary Backup Data Center

December 31, 2013.

I. Introduction

    On November 15, 2013, Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (``CME'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change (SR-CME-2013-24) pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\2\ The proposed rule change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on November 27, 2013.\3\ The Commission received
no comment letters regarding the proposal. For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission is granting approval of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-70917 (November 21,
2013), 78 FR 71015 (November 27, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description

    CME is proposing to activate its New York Data Center (``1NE Data
Center'') as its primary backup data center. The 1NE Data Center
currently operates in part as a tertiary data center for CME. CME has
proposed that the 1NE Data Center will be redesigned and will become
the primary backup data center in place of CME's current backup data
center, the Remote Data Center (``RDC''). In addition to housing CME's
New York trading floor and office staff systems, the 1NE Data Center
will house CME's primary back-up for electronic trading, clearing, and
regulatory infrastructures. CME has stated that because the 1NE Data
Center will be located in a distinct geographic area from CME's primary
facility, the proposal to relocate the primary backup data facility
will mitigate risks associated with a large scale disruption associated
with only one geographical area (for example, a weather event). Because
the 1NE Data Center will feature single IP connectivity, CME's
customers will not have to change their configurations or take any
additional steps to connect to the 1NE Data Center and the risk of
disruptions in connectivity will be decreased.
    CME has stated that the proposal will help to ensure that CME has
sufficient physical, technological and personnel resources to enable
the timely recovery and resumption of operations following disruptions,
resulting in an increase in reliability and security of its backup data
facilities. The proposed change does not involve any changes to CME's
rulebook.

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act \4\ directs the Commission to
approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if the
Commission finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act \5\ and the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to such self-regulatory organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F)
of the Act \6\ requires, among other things, that the rules of a
clearing agency are designed to promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent
applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions, to
assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the
custody or control of the clearing agency and for which it is
responsible and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest. The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
designed to enhance CME's business continuity program and data
reliability and security and thereby (1) promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, to
the extent applicable, derivatives agreements, contracts, and
transactions; (2) help to assure the safeguarding of securities and
funds which are in the custody or control of CME; and (3) help to
protect investors and the public interest, consistent with the
requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in
particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \8\ and the
rules and regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\9\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-CME-2013-24) be, and
hereby is, approved.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \10\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-00834 Filed 1-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: May 25, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 100)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 29253-29258]
[DOCID:fr25my10-18]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 67

[Docket ID FEMA-2010-0003; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1097]

Proposed Flood Elevation Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on the proposed Base (1% annual-chance)
Flood Elevations (BFEs) and proposed BFE modifications for the
communities listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to
seek general information and comment regarding the proposed regulatory
flood elevations for the reach described by the downstream and upstream
locations in the table below. The BFEs and modified BFEs are a part of
the floodplain management measures that the community is required
either to adopt or to show evidence of having in effect in order to
qualify or remain qualified for participation in the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, these elevations, once
finalized, will be used by insurance agents and others to calculate
appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and the
contents in those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before August 23, 2010.

ADDRESSES: The corresponding preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map
(FIRM) for the proposed BFEs for each community is available for
inspection at the community's map repository. The respective addresses
are listed in the table below.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-1097, to
Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief,
Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472,
(202) 646-2820, or (e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) proposes to make determinations of BFEs and modified BFEs for
each community listed below, in accordance with section 110 of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR
67.4(a).
    These proposed BFEs and modified BFEs, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. These proposed elevations
are used to meet the floodplain management requirements of the NFIP and
also are used to calculate the appropriate flood insurance premium
rates for new buildings built after these elevations are made final,
and for the contents in those buildings.
    Comments on any aspect of the Flood Insurance Study and FIRM, other
than the proposed BFEs, will be considered. A letter acknowledging
receipt of any comments will not be sent.
    National Environmental Policy Act. This proposed rule is
categorically excluded from the requirements of 44 CFR part 10,
Environmental Consideration. An environmental impact assessment has not
been prepared.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood elevation determinations are
not within the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
    Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. This
proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under the criteria
of section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as amended.
    Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This proposed rule involves no
policies that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
    Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This proposed rule
meets the applicable standards of Executive Order 12988.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67

    Administrative practice and procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.

    Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 67--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 67 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp., p. 376.

Sec.  67.4  [Amended]

    2. The tables published under the authority of Sec.  67.4 are
proposed to be amended as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                * Elevation in feet
                                                                                (NGVD) + Elevation in
                                                                                feet (NAVD)
                                                                                Depth in feet above
                State                      City/town/county                  Source of flooding                                     Location**                          ground [caret] Elevation
                                                                                in meters (MSL)
                                                                                -------------------------
                                                                                Existing     Modified
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                City of Hampton, Virginia
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virginia.............................  City of Hampton.........  Newmarket Creek..........................  Approximately 275 feet downstream of Big Bethel Road......           +8           +9
                                                                                Approximately 20 feet upstream of the confluence with              None          +22
                                                                                Newmarket Creek Tributary.
                                       City of Hampton.........  Newmarket Creek Tributary................  At the confluence with Newmarket Creek....................         None          +22
                                                                                Approximately 30 feet downstream of I-64..................         None          +22
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.
[caret] Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood
 Insurance Rate Map located at the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.
Send comments to Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                                                ADDRESSES

City of Hampton
Maps are available for inspection at the Central Permits Office, 22 Lincoln Avenue, Hampton, VA 23669.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  * Elevation in feet
                                                                (NGVD)  + Elevation in
                                                                feet (NAVD)
                                                                  Depth in feet above
         Flooding source(s)            Location of referenced       ground  [caret]        Communities affected
                                             elevation            Elevation in meters
                                                                         (MSL)
                                                              --------------------------
                                                                Effective     Modified
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Rio Grande County, Colorado, and Incorporated Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Willow Creek........................  At the confluence with          None       +8,154  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       the Rio Grande,                                    Rio Grande County.
                                       approximately 400 feet
                                       north of U.S. Route
                                       160.
                                      Approximately 1.1 mile          None       +8,766
                                       south of East Lake
                                       Court.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.
[caret] Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
 Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES

                                    Unincorporated Areas of Rio Grande County
Maps are available for inspection at 925 6th Street, Del Norte, CO 81132.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Washington County, Florida, and Incorporated Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alligator Creek.....................  At the upstream side of         None          +76  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       County Road 166.                                   Washington County.

                                      Approximately 3.2 miles         None          +81
                                       upstream of County
                                       Road 166.
Bear Bay Creek......................  At the confluence with          None          +44  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       Pine Log Creek.                                    Washington County.
                                      Approximately 3.9 miles         None          +76
                                       upstream of the
                                       confluence with Pine
                                       Log Creek.
Botheration Creek...................  At the confluence with          None          +32  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       Pine Log Creek.                                    Washington County.
                                      Approximately 200 feet          None          +90
                                       downstream of the
                                       county boundary.
Brock Mill Branch...................  At the confluence with          None          +54  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       Jones Rice Mill Branch.                            Washington County.
                                      Approximately 100 feet          None         +109
                                       downstream of State
                                       Road 77.
Flat Creek..........................  At the confluence with          None          +50  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       Hard Labor Creek.                                  Washington County.
                                      Approximately 9.7 miles         None         +160
                                       upstream of the
                                       confluence with Hard
                                       Labor Creek.
Hard Labor Creek....................  At State Road 277......         None          +43  Unincorporated Areas of
                                                                                Washington County.
                                      Approximately 15.6              None         +114
                                       miles upstream of the
                                       confluence with Holmes
                                       Creek.
Helms Branch........................  At the confluence with          None          +78  City of Chipley,
                                       Alligator Creek.                                   Unincorporated Areas
                                                                                of Washington County.
                                      Approximately 3.2 miles         None          +89
                                       upstream of the
                                       confluence with
                                       Alligator Creek.
Johnson Branch......................  At Roche Avenue........         None          +37  City of Vernon,
                                                                                Unincorporated Areas
                                                                                of Washington County.
                                      Approximately 3.8 miles         None         +101
                                       upstream of the
                                       confluence with Holmes
                                       Creek.
Jones Rice Mill Branch..............  At the upstream side of         None          +54  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       State Road 277.                                    Washington County.
                                      Approximately 5.9 miles         None         +146
                                       upstream of the
                                       confluence with Holmes
                                       Creek.
Pine Log Creek......................  Approximately 1.9 mile          None          +21  Town of Ebro,
                                       upstream of the                                    Unincorporated Areas
                                       confluence with the                                of Washington County.
                                       East River.
                                      At the confluence with          None          +44
                                       Bear Bay Creek.
Piney Branch........................  At State Road 77.......         None          +40  Unincorporated Areas of
                                                                                Washington County.
                                      Approximately 6.6 miles         None         +193
                                       upstream of the
                                       confluence with Holmes
                                       Creek.
Pippen Mill Creek...................  At Roche Avenue........         None          +37  City of Vernon,
                                                                                Unincorporated Areas
                                                                                of Washington County.
                                      Approximately 5.4 miles         None          +95
                                       upstream of the
                                       confluence with Holmes
                                       Creek.
Reedy Creek.........................  At the confluence with          None          +59  Town of Wausau,
                                       Hard Labor Creek.                                  Unincorporated Areas
                                                                                of Washington County.
                                      Approximately 3.8 miles         None         +105
                                       upstream of the
                                       confluence with Hard
                                       Labor Creek.
Unnamed Tributary 1 to Alligator      Approximately 765 feet          None          +68  Unincorporated Areas of
 Creek.                                upstream of State Road                             Washington County.
                                       277.
                                      Approximately 1.4 mile          None         +121
                                       upstream of State Road
                                       277.
Unnamed Tributary 2 to Alligator      Approximately 0.4 mile          None          +72  City of Chipley,
 Creek.                                upstream of the                                    Unincorporated Areas
                                       confluence with                                    of Washington County.
                                       Alligator Creek.
                                      Approximately 2.2 miles         None         +111
                                       upstream of the
                                       confluence with
                                       Alligator Creek.
Unnamed Tributary 3 to Alligator      At the confluence with          None          +76  City of Chipley,
 Creek.                                Alligator Creek.                                   Unincorporated Areas
                                                                                of Washington County.
                                      Approximately 2 miles           None         +102
                                       upstream of the
                                       confluence with
                                       Alligator Creek.

Unnamed Tributary to Helms Branch...  Approximately 300 feet          None         +117  City of Chipley,
                                       downstream of                                      Unincorporated Areas
                                       Brickyard Road.                                    of Washington County.
                                      Approximately 0.6 mile          None         +131
                                       upstream of Brickyard
                                       Road.
Unnamed Tributary to Holmes Creek...  Approximately 0.4 mile          None          +36  City of Vernon,
                                       upstream of the                                    Unincorporated Areas
                                       confluence with Holmes                             of Washington County.
                                       Creek.
                                      Approximately 2.2 miles         None          +52
                                       upstream of the
                                       confluence with Holmes
                                       Creek.
Unnamed Tributary to Holmes Creek     At the confluence with          None          +42  City of Vernon,
 East Branch.                          Unnamed Tributary to                               Unincorporated Areas
                                       Holmes Creek.                                      of Washington County.
                                      Approximately 1.3 mile          None          +55
                                       upstream of the
                                       confluence with
                                       Unnamed Tributary to
                                       Holmes Creek.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.
[caret] Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
 Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES

City of Chipley
Maps are available for inspection at City Hall, 1442 Jackson Avenue, Chipley, FL 32428.

City of Vernon
Maps are available for inspection at 2808 Yellow Jacket Drive, Vernon, FL 32462.

Town of Ebro
Maps are available for inspection at the Town Hall, 6629 Dog Track Road, Ebro, FL 32437.

Town of Wausau
Maps are available for inspection at the Town Hall, 1607 2nd Avenue, Wausau, FL 32463.

                                    Unincorporated Areas of Washington County
Maps are available for inspection at the Washington County Clerk's Office, 1293 Jackson Avenue, Chipley, FL
 32428.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Butler County, Iowa, and Incorporated Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beaver Creek........................  Approximately 1,800             None         +896  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       feet downstream of                                 Butler County.
                                       Utica Avenue.
                                      Approximately 1.2 mile          None         +901
                                       upstream of Utica
                                       Avenue.
Shell Rock River....................  Approximately 1.1 mile          None         +899  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       downstream of Cherry                               Butler County.
                                       Street.
                                      Approximately 0.9 mile          None         +909
                                       upstream of the dam.
Shell Rock River....................  On the downstream side          None         +923  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       of Iowa Northern                                   Butler County.
                                       Railway.
                                      Approximately 1,000             None         +931
                                       feet upstream of
                                       Chicago and North
                                       Western Railroad.
Shell Rock River....................  Approximately 0.7 mile          None         +955  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       downstream of Traer                                Butler County.
                                       Street.
                                      Approximately 700 feet          None         +960
                                       upstream of State
                                       Highway 14.
Shell Rock River Overflow Channel 2.  Approximately 900 feet          None         +955  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       downstream of Main                                 Butler County.
                                       Street.
                                      Approximately 400 feet          None         +958
                                       upstream of Main
                                       Street.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.
[caret] Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
 Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES

                                      Unincorporated Areas of Butler County
Maps are available for inspection at the Butler County Courthouse, 428 6th Street, Allison, IA 50602.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              Chesterfield County, Virginia, and Incorporated Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appomattox River....................  Approximately 0.9 mile          None           *9  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       upstream of the                                    Chesterfield County.
                                       confluence with Swift
                                       Creek.
                                      At the Chesterfield             None          *20
                                       County/City of
                                       Colonial Heights/City
                                       of Petersburg boundary.
Blackman Creek......................  At the confluence with          None         *197  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       Deep Creek and                                     Chesterfield County.
                                       Horsepen Creek.
                                      Approximately 3.7 miles         None         *287
                                       upstream of Otterdale
                                       Road (SR-667).
Crooked Branch......................  On the upstream side of         *127         *131  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       State Highway 288.                                 Chesterfield County.
                                      At the upstream side of         *147         *148
                                       Centralia Road (SR-
                                       145).
Deep Creek..........................  At the confluence with          None         *182  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       the Swift Creek                                    Chesterfield County.
                                       Reservoir.
                                      At the confluence with          None         *197
                                       Blackman Creek and
                                       Horsepen Creek.
Fuqua Branch........................  At the confluence with          None         *185  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       Dry Creek.                                         Chesterfield County.
                                      Approximately 2.2 miles         None         *261
                                       upstream of the
                                       Ashbrook Lake Dam.
Great Branch........................  Approximately 500 feet          *102         *103  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       upstream of Hamlin                                 Chesterfield County.
                                       Creek Parkway.
                                      Approximately 250 feet          *139         *141
                                       downstream of Chalkley
                                       Road.
Great Branch Tributary..............  At the confluence with          *126         *129  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       Great Branch.                                      Chesterfield County.
                                      Approximately 1,000             *127         *129
                                       feet downstream of
                                       Ecoff Avenue.
Horsepen Creek......................  At the confluence with          None         *197  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       Blackman Creek and                                 Chesterfield County.
                                       Deep Creek.
                                      Approximately 3.0 miles         None         *257
                                       upstream of the
                                       confluence with
                                       Blackman Creek and
                                       Deep Creek.
Johnsons Creek......................  Approximately 800 feet           *18          *19  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       downstream of Spruce                               Chesterfield County.
                                       Avenue.
                                      Approximately 0.8 mile          None         *128
                                       upstream of Old
                                       Bermuda Hundred Road.
Johnsons Creek Tributary............  Approximately 320 feet          None          *57  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       upstream of East                                   Chesterfield County.
                                       Hundred Road (SR-10).
                                      Approximately 100 feet          None          *63
                                       upstream of Bermuda
                                       Hundred Road.
Lake Chesdin........................  Entire shoreline in             None         *163  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       Chesterfield County.                               Chesterfield County.
Little Tomahawk Creek...............  At the confluence with          *183         *184  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       the Swift Creek                                    Chesterfield County.
                                       Reservoir.
                                      Approximately 1,800             *183         *184
                                       feet upstream of the
                                       confluence with the
                                       Swift Creek Reservoir.
Proctors Creek......................  On the upstream side of          *25          *27  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       the railroad.                                      Chesterfield County.
                                      Approximately 850 feet          *136         *137
                                       upstream of the
                                       confluence with
                                       Tributary 2 to
                                       Proctors Creek.
Swift Creek.........................  At Woolridge Road (SR-          None         *182  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       668).                                              Chesterfield County.
                                      At the Powhatan County          None         *227
                                       boundary.
Swift Creek Reservoir...............  Between Swift Creek             None         *182  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       Reservoir Dam and                                  Chesterfield County.
                                       Woolridge Road (SR-
                                       668).
                                      Between Genito Road and         None         *184
                                       the confluence with
                                       Little Tomahawk Creek
                                       and Tomahawk Creek.
Tomahawk Creek......................  At the confluence with          *183         *184  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       the Swift Creek                                    Chesterfield County.
                                       Reservoir.
                                      Approximately 1,500             *183         *184
                                       feet upstream of the
                                       confluence with the
                                       Swift Creek Reservoir.
Turkey Creek........................  At the confluence with          None         *194  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       Swift Creek.                                       Chesterfield County.

                                      Approximately 1.7 miles         None         *258
                                       upstream of Mount
                                       Herman Road (SR-606).
Winterpock Creek....................  At the confluence with          None         *163  Unincorporated Areas of
                                       Lake Chesdin.                                      Chesterfield County.
                                      Approximately 450 feet          None         *241
                                       upstream of Beach Road
                                       (SR-655).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.
[caret] Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
 Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES

                                   Unincorporated Areas of Chesterfield County
Maps are available for inspection at 9800 Government Center Parkway, Chesterfield, VA 23832.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: May 5, 2010.
Sandra K. Knight,
Deputy Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administrator, Mitigation,
Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-12481 Filed 5-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P