PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request EPA/ Office of Water/ Office of Wastewater Management 2. OMB control number b. G None a 2040 0207 __ __ __ __

3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. G New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. X Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a.

Regular b. Emergency  Approval requested by: c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes

No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a.

Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title Best Management Practices ( BMP) for the Bleached Papergrade Kraft and Soda Subcategory and the Papergrade Kraft Sulfite Subcategory of the Pulp, Paper and Paperboard Point Source Category ( Renewal)

8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) ICR#: 1829.03 9. Keywords BMP, Bleached Papergrade Kraft, Soda, Papergrade Kraft Sulfite, Pulp, Paper, Paperboard, 40 CFR Part 430, pulping liquors, soap, turpentine, monitoring 10. Abstract EPA established Best Management Practices ( BMP) provisions as part of final amendments to 40 CFR Part 430, the Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Point Source Category, promulgated on April 15, 1998. These provisions, promulgated under authority of the Clean Water Act, require owners or operators of bleached papergrade kraft, soda, and sulfite mills to implement site specific BMPs to prevent, or otherwise contain, leaks and spills of spent pulping liquors, soap, and turpentine and to control intentional diversions of these materials. In addition, the BMP provisions require the monitoring of BMP implementation effectiveness on a continuing basis by tracking the influent to treatment wastewater's loadings.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. P Business or other for profit e. X Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. X State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. G Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. P Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 128 b. Total annual responses 128 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 0 % c. Total hours requested 60,262 d. Current OMB inventory 60,909 e. Difference  647 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 0 2. Adjustment  647 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars)

a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs $ 0 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) $ 0 c. Total annualized cost requested $ 0 d. Current OMB inventory $ 0 e. Difference $ 0 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change $ 0 2. Adjustment $ 0 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. P Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a.  Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c.  Reporting 1. Q On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. Q Semi annually 6. Q Annually 7. Q Biannually 8. X Other ( describe) Not less than annually 17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes X No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Lynn Stabenfeldt Phone: ( 202) 564 0602 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( I) Why the information is being collected' ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( I) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official James A. Hanlon, Director Office of Wastewater Management Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Oscar Morales, Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Information Collection Office of Environmental Information Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95 Certification Requirement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions 5 CFR 1320.9 reads " As part of the agency submission to OMB of a proposed collection of information, the agency ( through the head of the agency, the Senior Official or their designee) shall certify ( and provide a record supporting such certification) that the proposed collection of information

"( a) is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including that the information to be collected will have practical utility;

"( b) is not unnecessarily duplicative of information otherwise reasonably accessible to the agency;

"( c) reduces to the extent practicable and appropriate the burden on persons who shall provide information to or for the agency, including with respect to small entities, as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U. S. C. § 601( 6)), the use of such techniques as:

"( 1) establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to those who are to respond; "( 2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting requirements; or collection of information , or any part thereof; "( 3) an exemption from coverage of the collection of information, or any part thereof;

"( d) is written using plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology and is understandable to those who are to respond;

"( e) is to be implemented in ways consistent and compatible, to the maximum extent practicable, with the existing reporting and recordkeeping practices of those who are to respond;

"( f) indicates for each recordkeeping requirement the length of time persons are required to maintain the records specified;

"( g) informs potential respondents of the information called for under § 1320.8( b)( 3); [ see below]

"( h) has been developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected, including the processing of the information in a manner which shall enhance, where appropriate, the utility of the information to agencies and the public;

"( I) uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology appropriate to the purpose for which the information is to be collected; and "( j) to the maximum extent practicable, uses appropriate information technology to reduce burden and improve data quality, agency efficiency and responsiveness to the public."

NOTE: 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3) requires that each collection of information:

"( 3) informs and provides reasonable notice to the potential persons to whom the collection of information is addressed of: "( I) the reasons the information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( ii) the way such information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( iii) an estimate, to the extent practicable, of the average burden of the collection ( together with a request that the public direct to the agency any comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden); "( iv) whether responses to the collection of information are voluntary, required to obtain or retain a benefit ( citing authority), or mandatory ( citing authority); "( v) the nature and extent of confidentiality to be provided, if any ( citing authority); and "( vi) the fact that any agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number."

OMB 83 I ( Instructions) 10/ 95


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8655-8657]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02557]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-68789; File No. SR-BATS-2013-005]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Modify the Competitive Liquidity
Provider Program to, Among Other Things, Modify the Calculation of Size
Event Tests

January 31, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 18, 2013, BATS Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``BATS'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing with the Commission a proposal to amend
Interpretation and Policy .02 to Rule 11.8, entitled ``Competitive
Liquidity Provider Program.''
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at http://www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    On August 30, 2011, the Exchange received approval of rules
applicable to the qualification, listing and delisting of securities of
issuers on the Exchange.\3\ More recently, the Exchange received
approval to operate a program that is designed to incentivize certain
market makers registered with the Exchange as Competitive Liquidity
Providers (``CLPs'') to enhance liquidity on the Exchange in Exchange-
listed securities (the ``Competitive Liquidity Provider Program'' or
``CLP Program'').\4\ The Program seeks to establish a venue for the
execution of retail orders with greater price competition and
transparency than existing execution arrangements. The Exchange
subsequently adopted financial incentives for the CLP Program \5\ and
thereafter amended certain financial incentives for the CLP Program.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65225 (August 30,
2011), 76 FR 55148 (September 6, 2011) (SR-BATS-2011-018).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66307 (February 2,
2012), 77 FR 6608 (February 8, 2012) (SR-BATS-2011-051).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66427 (February 21,
2012), 77 FR 11608 (February 27, 2012) (SR-BATS-2012-011).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67854 (September 13,
2012), 77 FR 58198 (September 19, 2012) (SR-BATS-2012-036).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of this filing is to modify Interpretation and Policy
.02 of Rule 11.8 regarding certain details around the implementation of
the CLP Program. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to: (1) Expand the
time during which the Exchange will calculate Size Event Tests
(``SETs'') to between 9:25 a.m. and 4:05 p.m.; (2) calculate SETs
separately for bids and offers; (3) provide separate daily rebates
based on the greatest number of winning bid SETs and winning offer
SETs; (4) increase the

minimum quote to have a winning SET to five round lots; (5) require a
CLP to also quote at least one round lot at or within 1.2% of the CLP's
bid or offer in order to have a winning SET during Regular Trading
Hours; \7\ and (6) change the system for allocating the daily rebate to
the CLPs with the highest and second highest winning SETs from a set
percentage to a pro rata basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Regular Trading Hours is defined in BATS Rule 1.5(w).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Extending the Time of the CLP Program
    The Exchange is proposing to expand the time during which SETs are
calculated on the Exchange. Currently, the Exchange calculates SETs at
least once per second, but only during Regular Trading Hours. This
Exchange proposes to expand the time during which SETs are calculated
to include the period five minutes before the beginning of Regular
Trading Hours and five minutes after Regular Trading Hours, or 9:25
a.m. to 4:05 p.m. The Exchange is proposing this change in order to
encourage CLPs to enter aggressively priced orders immediately prior
to, during, and immediately after both Opening Auctions \8\ and Closing
Auctions \9\ in BATS listed securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The process for Opening Auctions in BATS listed securities
is described in BATS Rule 11.23(b).
    \9\ The process for Closing Auctions in BATS listed securities
is described in BATS Rule 11.23(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Calculating SETs Separately for Bids and Offers
    The Exchange also proposes to calculate SETs and provide rebates
separately for bids and offers. Currently, the Exchange calculates and
determines the winner(s) of each SET by adding together the total
number of bid shares that a CLP is quoting at the NBB and the number of
offer shares that the CLP is quoting at the NBO (the ``Combined
Shares''). The Exchange then determines the SET winner based on the
highest total Combined Shares.
    This proposal intends to amend Interpretation and Policy .02(g) of
Rule 11.8 so that the Exchange calculates SETs separately for bids and
offers. As proposed, the Exchange would evaluate a CLP's bid quotes and
offer quotes separately, meaning that the CLP or CLPs with the greatest
aggregate size at the NBB will be considered to have a winning bid SET
and the CLP or CLPs with the greatest aggregate size at the NBO will be
considered to have a winning offer SET. No CLPs would be considered to
have a winning SET for having the greatest aggregate size at the NBB
and NBO combined.
Minimum Quote Size Requirement
    The Exchange is proposing to increase the minimum quote size
requirement to be eligible to have a winning SET during Regular Trading
Hours. Currently, the Exchange only requires that a CLP's orders are
for at least one round lot. Specifically, this proposal to amend sub-
paragraph (g)(4) of Interpretation and Policy .02 to Rule 11.8 is
intended to increase the minimum quote size requirement to five round
lots (usually 500 shares) for a CLP to have a winning bid or offer SET.
The Exchange is proposing this change to encourage CLPs to provide
additional liquidity at the NBBO in BATS listed securities.
Contra-Side Quoting Requirement
    The Exchange also proposes that a CLP be required to quote at least
one round lot at or within 1.2% of the CLP's bid or offer in order to
have a winning SET during Regular Trading Hours. Currently, outside of
daily and monthly quoting requirements, the Exchange does not have any
quoting requirements for CLPs. More specifically, the Exchange does not
currently have any contra-side quoting requirements that a CLP must
meet in order to be considered to have a winning SET.
    This proposal to add sub-paragraph (g)(5) to Interpretation and
Policy .02 to Rule 11.8 is intended to require that, in order to have a
winning bid SET or winning offer SET during Regular Trading Hours, a
CLP must have a bid or offer on the contra-side at a price at or within
1.2% of the CLP's winning offer or bid, respectively. For example, as
proposed, in order for a CLP to have a winning bid SET for a 500 share
bid priced at $10.00, the CLP must, at the time of the SET, also have
at least one round lot offer for between $10.00 and $10.12. For a CLP
to have a winning offer SET for a 500 share offer priced at $10.00, the
CLP must, at the time of the SET, also have at least one round lot bid
priced between $9.88 and $10.00. The Exchange is proposing this
amendment in order to require CLPs to provide liquidity on both sides
of the market in order to be considered to have a winning bid or offer
SET. The Exchange is proposing to have this requirement apply only to
SETs during Regular Trading Hours in order to mitigate exposure due to
potentially high volatility in pricing that occurs outside of Regular
Trading Hours.
Providing Daily Financial Rebates Separately for Bid SETs and Offer
SETs
    The Exchange proposes to provide separate daily rebates based on
the greatest number of winning bid SETs and winning offer SETs.
Currently, the one or two CLPs (depending on the type of security) with
the greatest number of winning SETs (subject to other requirements, not
relevant for the purposes of this proposed change) win a set percentage
of a single daily rebate. The Exchange is proposing, in conjunction
with the above proposed change to calculate SETs separately for bids
and offers, to amend Interpretation and Policy .02 (g)(1)(A) and (k)(1)
of Rule 11.8 to provide daily financial rebates to CLPs based on which
CLP or CLPs have the greatest number of winning bid SETs and,
separately, winning offer SETs.
Allocation of Daily Financial Rebates
    The Exchange is also proposing to amend the way that it allocates
daily financial rebates to CLPs. Currently, for all CLP eligible
securities with the exception of Tier II securities,\10\ the Exchange
allocates daily financial rebates on an 80/20 basis in which the
eligible CLP with the highest number of winning SETs receives 80% of
the daily financial rebate and the eligible CLP with the second highest
number of winning SETs receives 20% of the daily financial rebate.\11\
Frequently, the Exchange has found that the CLP with the most or second
most winning SETs will realize that they are so far in front of the
next CLP and/or so far behind the CLP in front of them that they no
longer have incentive to continue to provide aggressive quotes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ As defined in BATS Rule 14.9.
    \11\ It is worth noting that the Exchange currently does not
distinguish between bid SETs and offer SETs and awards the daily
financial rebates to CLPs based only on the total number of winning
SETs (whether on an 80/20 basis or, as under Tier II, 100% to a
single CLP). As described above, the Exchange is proposing to
calculate both winning bid SETs and winning offer SETs and, as such,
is also proposing to provide separate and independent financial
rebates to CLPs for bid SETs and offer SETs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In order to incentivize CLPs to continue to quote aggressively
throughout the day, the Exchange is proposing to amend paragraph (k)(1)
of Interpretation and Policy .02 to Rule 11.8 to allocate daily
financial rebates to CLPs on a pro rata basis. Specifically, the
Exchange is proposing to determine the two CLPs that receive the daily
financial rebates on the same basis, however, rather than receiving a
pre-set percentage of the financial rebate, the CLPs will split the
financial rebate based on the number of each CLP's winning SETs as a
percentage of total winning SETs between the two winning CLPs. For
instance, where CLP1 has 6,000 winning SETs, CLP2 has 4,000

winning SETS, and CLP3 has 3,000 winning SETs, currently, the Exchange
would award 80% to CLP1 and 20% to CLP2, based on the set percentages.
However, as proposed, CLP1 would be allocated 60% of the financial
rebate [6,000/(6000+4000)] and CLP2 would be allocated 40% of the
financial rebate [4,000/(6,000+4,000)]. The Exchange is not proposing
to reallocate the daily financial rebates for Tier II securities.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular,
with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\12\ In particular,
the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\13\ because
it would promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove
impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system. The Exchange believes that the proposal
will benefit market participants by incentivizing increased
participation in the Opening and Closing Auction by expanding the time
during which the Exchange will conduct SETs, thus improving the price
discovery process. The Exchange also believes that the proposal will
promote tighter spreads for all market participants by separately
calculating SETs and providing rebates for bids and offers rather than
combined bids and offers, which will incentivize CLPs to quote more
aggressively on both the bid and offer. Further, the Exchange believes
that the proposal will promote tighter spreads by requiring that CLPs
quote at least one round lot at or within 1.2% of a bid or offer in
order to have a winning SET during Regular Trading Hours. In addition
to creating tighter spreads, the Exchange further believes that the
proposal is consistent with the Act because it will help to increase
liquidity at the NBBO by increasing the minimum quote size from one
round lot to five round lots. Finally, the Exchange believes that the
proposed pro-rata structure will incentivize CLPs to quote aggressively
on a continuous basis throughout each trading day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition.
The Exchange believes that the proposal will merely improve the
incentives and, in turn, the results, of its CLP Program. The Exchange
believes that the proposed changes will enhance competition amongst
participants in the CLP Program.

(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will: (a) By order approve
or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BATS-2013-005 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2013-005. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2013-005 and should be
submitted on or before February 27, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2013-02557 Filed 2-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 18 (Monday, January 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8779-8780]
[FR Doc No: 2017-01897]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 32432; 812-14389]

Aspiration Funds and Aspiration Fund Adviser, LLC; Notice of
Application

January 24, 2017.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION: Notice of an application under section 6(c) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') for an exemption from section 15(a) of
the Act and rule 18f-2 under the Act. The requested exemption would
permit an investment adviser to hire and replace certain

subadvisers without shareholder approval.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Applicants:  Aspiration Funds (the ``Trust''), a Delaware statutory
trust registered under the Act as an open-end management investment
company with multiple series, and Aspiration Fund Adviser, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company registered as an investment adviser
under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the ``Adviser,'' and,
collectively with the Trust, the ``Applicants'').

Filing Dates:  The application was filed November 25, 2014, and amended
on March 7, 2016, August 30, 2016 and January 6, 2017.

Hearing or Notification of Hearing:  An order granting the application
will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested
persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's Secretary
and serving Applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by
mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30
p.m. on February 21, 2017, and should be accompanied by proof of
service on the Applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers,
a certificate of service. Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing
requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, any facts
bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason
for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the
Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicants: 4640 Admiralty Way,
Marina Del Rey, CA 90292.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara T. Heussler, Senior Counsel,
at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Mary Kay Frech, Branch Chief, at<PHONE_NUMBER>
(Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or an applicant
using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or
by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Summary of the Application

    1. The Adviser serves as the investment adviser to the Funds
pursuant to an investment advisory agreement with the Trust (the
``Advisory Agreement'').\1\ The Adviser is responsible for the overall
management of the Funds' business affairs and selecting investments
according to each Fund's respective investment objective, policies, and
restrictions, subject to the oversight and authority of each Fund's
board of trustees (``Board''). The Advisory Agreement permits the
Adviser, subject to the approval of the Board, to delegate to one or
more subadvisers (each, a ``Subadviser'' and collectively, the
``Subadvisers'') the responsibility to provide the day-to-day portfolio
investment management of each Fund, subject to the supervision and
direction of the Adviser. The primary responsibility for managing the
Funds will remain vested in the Adviser. The Adviser will hire,
evaluate, allocate assets to and oversee the Subadvisers, including
determining whether a Subadviser should be terminated, at all times
subject to the authority of the Board.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Applicants request relief with respect to any existing or
future series of the Trust and any other existing or future
registered open-end management investment company or series thereof
that: (a) Is advised by the Adviser, including any entity
controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser
or its successors (each, also an ``Adviser''); (b) uses the manager
of managers structure described in the application; and (c) complies
with the terms and conditions of the application (any such series, a
``Fund'' and collectively, the ``Funds''). For purposes of the
requested order, ``successor'' is limited to an entity that results
from a reorganization into another jurisdiction or a change in the
type of business organization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Applicants request an exemption to permit the Adviser, subject
to Board approval, to hire certain Subadvisers pursuant to Subadvisory
Agreements and materially amend existing Subadvisory Agreements without
obtaining the shareholder approval required under section 15(a) of the
Act and rule 18f-2 under the Act.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The requested relief will not extend to any subadviser that
is an affiliated person, as defined in section 2(a)(3) of the Act,
of the Trust, a Fund or the Adviser, other than by reason of serving
as a subadviser to one or more of the Funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief
will be subject to the terms and conditions stated in the application.
Such terms and conditions provide for, among other safeguards,
appropriate disclosure to Fund shareholders and notification about sub-
advisory changes and enhanced Board oversight to protect the interests
of the Funds' shareholders.
    4. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that the Commission may exempt
any person, security, or transaction or any class or classes of
persons, securities, or transactions from any provisions of the Act, or
any rule thereunder, if such relief is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and
purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.
Applicants believe that the requested relief meets this standard
because, as further explained in the application, the Advisory
Agreements will remain subject to shareholder approval, while the role
of the Subadvisers is substantially similar to that of individual
portfolio managers, so that requiring shareholder approval of
Subadvisory Agreements would impose unnecessary delays and expenses on
the Funds.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-01897 Filed 1-27-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 207 (Tuesday, October 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65768-65769]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27268]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2015-D-3539]

Interim Policy on Compounding Using Bulk Drug Substances Under
Section 503B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; Draft
Guidance for Industry; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) is
announcing the availability of a draft guidance entitled ``Interim
Policy on Compounding Using Bulk Drug Substances Under Section 503B of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.'' The draft guidance
describes FDA's interim regulatory policy regarding outsourcing
facilities that compound human drug products using bulk drug substances
while FDA develops the list of bulk drug substances that can be used in
compounding under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C
Act). When final, the guidance will reflect the Agency's current
thinking on the issues addressed by the guidance.

DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on this
draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by December 28, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to http://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your

comments, that information will be posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2015-D-3539 for ``Interim Policy on Compounding Using Bulk Drug
Substances Under Section 503B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act; Draft Guidance for Industry; Availability.'' Received comments
will be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as
``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets Management between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Submit written requests for single copies of this guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave., Hillandale
Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one self-
addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the guidance document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara Rothman, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave. Bldg. 51, Rm. 5197, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-3110.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance entitled
``Interim Policy on Compounding Using Bulk Drug Substances Under
Section 503B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.'' A new
section 503B (21 U.S.C. 353b), added to the FD&C Act by the Drug
Quality and Security Act (Pub. L. 113-54) in 2013, describes the
conditions that must be satisfied for human drug products compounded by
an outsourcing facility to be exempt from the following three sections
of the FD&C Act: Section 505 (21 U.S.C. 355) (concerning the approval
of drugs under new drug applications or abbreviated new drug
applications); section 502(f)(1) (21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)) (concerning the
labeling of drugs with adequate directions for use); and section 582
(21 U.S.C. 360eee-1) (concerning drug supply chain security
requirements). One of the conditions that must be met for a drug
product compounded by an outsourcing facility to qualify for these
exemptions is that the outsourcing facility does not compound drug
products using a bulk drug substance unless: (1) It appears on a list
established by the Secretary identifying bulk drug substances for which
there is a clinical need (see section 503B(a)(2)(A)(i) of the FD&C Act)
or (2) the drug product compounded from such bulk drug substances
appears on the drug shortage list in effect under section 506E of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 356e) at the time of compounding, distribution, and
dispensing (see section 503B(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the FD&C Act).
    This guidance describes the conditions under which FDA does not
intend to take action against an outsourcing facility for compounding a
drug product from a bulk drug substance that does not appear on a list
of bulk drug substances that may be used in compounding and is not used
to compound a drug product that appears on the FDA drug shortage list
at the time of compounding, distribution, and dispensing, while FDA
develops the list of bulk drug substances that can be used in
compounding under section 503B(a)(2)(A)(i) of the FD&C Act.
    Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, the Agency is
making available for public comment a draft guidance entitled ``Interim
Policy on Compounding Using Bulk Drug Substances Under Section 503A of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act,'' which describes the
conditions under which FDA does not intend to take action against a
licensed pharmacist at a State-licensed pharmacy or a Federal facility
for compounding a drug product from a bulk drug substance that cannot
otherwise be used in compounding under section 503A of the FD&C Act
while FDA develops the list of bulk drug substances that can be used in
compounding under section 503A(b)(1)(A)(i)(III).

II. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the guidance at
either http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: October 21, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-27268 Filed 10-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8408-8410]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03989]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0006; FRL-9972-17]

Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions Filed for Residues of
Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the Agency's receipt of several
initial filings of pesticide petitions requesting the establishment or
modification of regulations for residues of pesticide chemicals in or
on various commodities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 29, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number and the pesticide petition number (PP) of interest as shown
in the body of this document, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Goodis, Registration Division
(7505P), main telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
[email protected], The mailing address for each contact person is:
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural

producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes
is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help
readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially
affected entities may include:
    [emsp14]Crop production (NAICS code 111).
    [emsp14]Animal production (NAICS code 112).
    [emsp14]Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
    [emsp14]Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this
action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT for the division listed at the end of the
pesticide petition summary of interest.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
    3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low-income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.

II. What action is the Agency taking?

    EPA is announcing its receipt of several pesticide petitions filed
under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
21 U.S.C. 346a, requesting the establishment or modification of
regulations in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of pesticide chemicals in
or on various food commodities. The Agency is taking public comment on
the requests before responding to the petitioners. EPA is not proposing
any particular action at this time. EPA has determined that the
pesticide petitions described in this document contain the data or
information prescribed in FFDCA section 408(d)(2), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(2); however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the
submitted data at this time or whether the data support granting of the
pesticide petitions. After considering the public comments, EPA intends
to evaluate whether and what action may be warranted. Additional data
may be needed before EPA can make a final determination on these
pesticide petitions.
    Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a summary of each of the petitions
that are the subject of this document, prepared by the petitioner, is
included in a docket EPA has created for each rulemaking. The docket
for each of the petitions is available at http://www.regulations.gov.
    As specified in FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), EPA
is publishing notice of the petition so that the public has an
opportunity to comment on this request for the establishment or
modification of regulations for residues of pesticides in or on food
commodities. Further information on the petition may be obtained
through the petition summary referenced in this unit.

Amended Tolerances

    1. PP 7F8552. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0234 Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC,
P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419-18300, requests to amend the
tolerance in 40 CFR part 180.565 for residues of the insecticide,
thiamethoxam, {3-[(2-chloro-5-thiazolyl)methyl]tetrahydro-5-methyl-N-
nitro-4H-1,3,5-oxadiazin-4-imine{time}  (CAS Reg. No. 153719-23-4) and
its metabolite[N-(2-chloro-thiazol-5-ylmethyl)-N'-methyl-N'-nitro-
guanidine on the grain, cereal, group 15, except barley at 0.02 parts
per million (ppm) by establishing individual tolerances in or on
buckwheat, grain at 0.9 ppm; corn, field grain at 0.02 ppm; oat, grain
at 0.9 ppm; rice, grain at 6 ppm; rice, straw at 2 ppm; rye, grain at
0.9 ppm; sorghum, grain at 0.6; sorghum, grain forage at 0.9 ppm;
sorghum, sweet, stalk at 0.7 ppm; triticale grain at 0.9 ppm; wheat,
bran at 0.5 ppm; wheat, germ at 0.5 ppm; wheat, grain at 0.5 ppm. In
addition, Syngenta requests to amend existing tolerances in 40 CFR
180.565 for residues of the insecticide, thiamethoxam, {3-[(2-chloro-5
thiazolyl)methyl]tetrahydro-5-methyl-N-nitro-4H-1,3,5-oxadiazin-4-
imine{time}  (CAS Reg. No. 153719-23-4) and its metabolite[N-(2-chloro-
thiazol-5-ylmethyl)-N'-methyl-N'-nitro-guanidine as follows: Alfalfa,
forage from 0.05 to 10 ppm; alfalfa, hay from 0.12 to 8 ppm; aspirated
grain fractions from 2.0 to 2.5 ppm; barley, hay from 0.40 to 1.5 ppm;
barley, grain from 0.4 to 0.9 ppm; barley, straw from 0.40 to 3 ppm;
corn, field, forage from 0.10 to 0.6 ppm; corn, field, stover from 0.05
to 1.0 ppm; corn, pop, forage from 0.10 to 0.6 ppm; corn, pop, stover
from 0.05 to 1.0 ppm; corn, sweet forage from 0.10 to 5 ppm; corn,
sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed from 0.02 to 0.03 ppm; corn,
sweet, stover from 0.05 to 4 ppm; potato from 0.25 to 0.15 ppm;
sorghum, grain, stover from 0.02 to 1.5 ppm; wheat, forage from 0.50 to
3 ppm; wheat, hay from 0.02 to 8 ppm; and wheat, straw from 0.02 to 6
ppm. The liquid chromatography with either UV or MS detections is used
to measure and evaluate the chemical. Contact: RD.
    2. PP 7F8633. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0530). Bayer CropScience LP2, T.W.
Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, requests to amend the
tolerance in 40 CFR 180.555 for residues of the fungicide,
trifloxystrobin, in or on grain, aspirated fractions at 15 ppm. Either
gas chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detection, or liquid
chromatography/mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) are used
to measure and evaluate the chemical trifloxystrobin and the free form
of its acid metabolite CGA-321113 ((E,E)-methoxyimino-[2-[1-(3-
trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-ethylideneaminooxymethyl]-phenyl]acetic acid).
Contact: RD.

New Tolerance Exemptions for Inerts (Except PIPS)

    1. PP IN-11023. (EPA-HQ-OPP 2017-0666) Lewis & Harrison, LLC, 122 C
Street NW, Suite 505, Washington, DC 20001, on behalf of BASF
Corporation, 100 Park Avenue, Florham Park, NJ 07932 requests to
establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues
of poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), [alpha]-(1-oxoalkyl)-[omega]-methoxy-,
where the alkyl chain contains a minimum of six and a maximum of 18

carbons and the oxyethylene content is 3-13 moles (CAS Reg. Nos. 53100-
65-5, 194289-64-0- 34398-00-0, 9006-27-3, 32761-35-6, 53467-81-5,
518299-31-5, 34397-99-4) when used as a stabilizer and solubilizing
agent in pesticide formulations applied to growing crops or raw
agricultural commodities after harvest at a maximum concentration in
pesticide formulation of 25% by weight. The petitioner believes no
analytical method is needed because it is not required for the
establishment of a tolerance exemption for inert ingredients. Contact:
RD.
    2. PP IN-11059. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0574) Nutri Ag, Inc., 4740 N
Interstate 35 E, Waxahachie, TX 75165 requests to establish an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of zinc
oxide (CAS Reg. No. 1314-13-2) when used as an inert ingredient
(stabilizer) in pesticide formulations applied to growing crops and raw
agricultural commodities after harvest under 40 CFR 180.910. The
petitioner believes no analytical method is needed because it is not
required for an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Contact:
RD.

New Tolerances for Non-Inerts

    1. PP 7E8584. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0505). Bayer CropScience, 2 T.W.
Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, requests to
establish a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of spiromesifen;
2-oxo-3-(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-1-oxaspiro[4.4]non-3-en-4-yl 3,3-
dimethylbutanoate, and its enol metabolite (4-hydroxy-3-(2,4,6-
trimethylphenyl)-1-oxaspiro[4.4]non-3-en-2-one calculated as the
stoichiometric equivalent of spiromesifen in or on the raw agricultural
commodities Coffee bean, green at 0.20 parts per million (ppm); Coffee
bean, roasted at 0.20 ppm; and Coffee, instant at 0.20 ppm.
Spiromesifen residues are quantified in raw agricultural commodities by
high pressure liquid chromatography/triple stage quadrupole mass
spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) using the stable isotopically labeled analytes
as internal standards. Contact: RD.
    2. PP 6F8533. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0235). Monsanto Company, 1300 I
Street NW, Suite 450 East, Washington, DC 20005, requests to establish
a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the herbicide acetochlor
in or on Alfalfa, forage at 8 ppm, Alfalfa, hay at 20 ppm, Cattle, fat
at 0.02 ppm, Cattle, kidney at 0.03 ppm, Cattle, meat at 0.02 ppm,
Cattle, meat byproducts, except kidney at 0.02 ppm, Goat, fat at 0.02
ppm, Goat, kidney at 0.03 ppm, Goat, meat at 0.02 ppm, Goat, meat
byproducts, except kidney at 0.02 ppm, Hog, kidney at 0.02 ppm, Horse,
fat at 0.02 ppm, Horse, kidney at 0.03 ppm, Horse, meat at 0.02 ppm,
Horse, meat byproducts, except kidney at 0.02 ppm, Milk at 0.02 ppm,
Sheep, fat at 0.02 ppm, Sheep, kidney at 0.03 ppm, Sheep, meat at 0.02
ppm, Sheep, meat byproducts, except kidney at 0.02 ppm. The HPLC-OCED
is used to measure and evaluate the chemical acetochlor. Contact: RD.
    3. PP 7F8552. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0234). Syngenta Crop Protection,
LLC, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419-18300, requests to establish
a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the insecticide,
thiamethoxam, {3-[(2-chloro-5-thiazolyl)methyl]tetrahydro-5-methyl-N-
nitro-4H-1,3,5-oxadiazin-4-imine{time}  (CAS Reg. No. 153719-23-4) and
its metabolite[N-(2-chloro-thiazol-5-ylmethyl)-N'-methyl-N'-nitro-
guanidine, in or on Alfalfa, seed at 1 ppm; and sugarcane at 0.01 ppm.
Contact: RD.
    4. PP 7F8595. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0530). Bayer CropScience LP2, T.W.
Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, requests to establish
a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the fungicide,
trifloxystrobin, in or on Flax, seed at 0.4 ppm. Either gas
chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detection, or liquid
chromatography/mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) are used
to measure and evaluate the chemical trifloxystrobin and the free form
of its acid metabolite CGA-321113 ((E,E)-methoxyimino-[2-[1-(3-
trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-ethylideneaminooxymethyl]-phenyl]acetic acid).
Contact: RD.
    5. PP 7F8596. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0531). Bayer CropScience LP2, T.W.
Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, requests to establish
a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the fungicide,
prothioconazole, in or on Crop Subgroup 20A (Rapeseed Subgroup) at 0.15
ppm. The LC/MS/MS analytical method is used to measure and evaluate the
chemical prothioconazole, 2-[2-(1-chlorocylcopropyl)-3-(2-
chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxypropyl]-1,2-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thion,
including its metabolites and degradates, in or on the commodities with
tolerances. Compliance with the tolerance levels specified is to be
determined by measuring only prothioconazole and its metabolite
prothioconazole-desthio, or [alpha]-(1-chlorocyclopropyl)-[alpha]-[(2-
chlorophenyl)methyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazole-1-ethanol, calculated as parent
in or on the commodity. Contact: RD.
    6. PP 7F8614. EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0572. Makhteshim Agan of North
America (d/b/a ADAMA, 3120 Highlands Blvd., Suite 100, Raleigh, NC
27604), requests to establish a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for
residues of the nematicide, fluensulfone, including its metabolites and
degradates, in or on the following commodities: Citrus dried pulp at
0.4 ppm; Crop Group 10-10, citrus fruit at 0.15 ppm; peanut at 0.15
ppm; peanut, hay at 8.0 ppm; and peanut, meal at 0.30 ppm. The LC-MS/MS
is used to measure and evaluate the metabolite Butene Sulfonic Acid (M-
3627). Contact: RD.
    7. PP 7F8615. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0665). Gowan Company, P.O. Box 5569,
Yuma, AZ 85366, requests to establish a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180
for residues of the fungicide, zoxamide, in or on crop subgroup 8-10B
(pepper/eggplant subgroup) at 0.9 ppm. The Rohm and Haas Company Method
Number 34-99-85 is used to measure and evaluate the chemical zoxamide,
3, 5-dichloro-N-(3-chloro-1-ethyl-1-methyl-2-oxopropyl)-4-
methylbenzamide. Contact: RD.
    8. PP 7F8624. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0616). BASF Corporation, 26 Davis
Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, requests to establish a
tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the fungicide,
metrafenone, in or on mushrooms at 0.5 ppm. The LC/MS/MS is used to
measure and evaluate the chemical metrafenone (3-bromo-6-methoxy-2-
methylphenyl)(2,3,4-trimethoxy-6-methylphenyl)methanone. Contact: RD.

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 346a.

    Dated: January 16, 2018.
Delores Barber,
Director, Information Technology and Resources Management Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2018-03989 Filed 2-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


      MEMORANDUM

      DATE:07/14/2015
      FROM: 		Laura Farris/EPA Region 8
      TO:CLEAN Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR - 2013-0602
      SUBJECT:	Vail Symposium on 07/13/2015

      SUMMARY:
      Laura Farris delivered a presentation on the Clean Power Plan on 07/13/2015 at the Vail Symposium. The meeting was held in Edwards, Colorado. The Clean Power Plan was proposed on June 2, 2014.

      ATTENDEES:

EPA
      Laura Farris, EPA Region 8

      External Stakeholders
	General public


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 57 (Tuesday, March 24, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 16719]
[FR Doc No: 2020-06109]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-195; OMB Control No. 3235-0198]

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension:
    Rule 15c2-5.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing
collection of information provided for in Rule 15c2-5 (17 CFR 240.15c2-
5) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.)
(``Exchange Act''). The Commission plans to submit this existing
collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget
(``OMB'') for extension and approval.
    Rule 15c2-5 prohibits a broker-dealer from arranging or extending
certain loans to persons in connection with the offer or sale of
securities unless, before any element of the transaction is entered
into, the broker-dealer: (1) Delivers to the person a written statement
containing the exact nature and extent of the person's obligations
under the loan arrangement; the risks and disadvantages of the loan
arrangement; and all commissions, discounts, and other remuneration
received and to be received in connection with the transaction by the
broker-dealer or certain related persons (unless the person receives
certain materials from the lender or broker-dealer which contain the
required information); and (2) obtains from the person information on
the person's financial situation and needs, reasonably determines that
the transaction is suitable for the person, and retains on file and
makes available to the person on request a written statement setting
forth the broker-dealer's basis for determining that the transaction
was suitable. The collection of information required by Rule 15c2-5 is
necessary to execute the Commission's mandate under the Exchange Act to
prevent fraudulent, manipulative, and deceptive acts and practices by
broker-dealers.
    The Commission estimates that there are approximately 50
respondents that require an aggregate total of 600 hours to comply with
Rule 15c2-5.\1\ Each of these approximately 50 registered broker-
dealers makes an estimated six annual responses, for an aggregate total
of 300 responses per year.\2\ Each response takes approximately two
hours to complete. Thus, the total compliance burden per year is 600
burden hours.\3\ The approximate internal compliance cost per hour is
$63.00 for clerical labor,\4\ resulting in a total internal compliance
cost of $37,800.\5\ These reflect internal labor costs; there are no
external labor, capital, or start-up costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 50 respondents x 6 responses per year x 2 hours per response
= 600 hours per year.
    \2\ 50 respondents x 6 responses per year = 300 responses per
year.
    \3\ 300 responses per year x 2 hours per response = 600 hours
per year.
    \4\ Cost per hour for a clerk is from SIFMA's Office Salaries in
the Securities Industry 2013, modified by Commission staff to
account for an 1800-hour work-year, multiplied by 2.93 to account
for bonuses, firm size, employee benefits and overhead, and adjusted
by a factor of 1.0965 to account for inflation.
    \5\ 600 hours per year x $63.00 per hour = $37,800 per year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: David Bottom, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o
Cynthia Roscoe, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: March 18, 2020.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-06109 Filed 3-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

06/18/2007 04:41 PM

To

<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, <EMAIL_ADDRESS> Subject

Further revisions in section IV.B (biologically relevant indices)

These four pages are the entirety section IV B of the ozone preamble.

----- Forwarded by Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US on 06/18/2007 04:39 PM -----

Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US

06/18/2007 03:59 PM

To

Wegman Lydia@EPA

cc

Subject

further revisions in section IV.B (biologically relevant indices) to be sent to OMB

This short (4 page section) has some changes that address comments that were not addressed in the two packages already sent to OMB.

Karen Martin, Ph.D.

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. EPA (C504-06)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>

fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>


[Federal Register: October 7, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 195)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 58436-58438]
[DOCID:fr07oc08-3]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0976; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-145-AD;
Amendment 39-15685; AD 2008-21-01]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model
BAe.125 Series 800A (including C-29A and U-125) Airplanes, and Hawker
Beechcraft Model Hawker 800XP Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model BAe.125 series 800A (including C-
29A and U-125) airplanes, and Hawker Beechcraft Model Hawker 800XP
airplanes. This AD requires doing an inspection to determine the serial
number and part number on the main landing gear (MLG) upper casing, and
replacing the MLG assembly with a serviceable MLG assembly if
necessary. This AD results from a report indicating that the MLG
casings have received improper hydrogen embrittlement relief. We are
issuing this AD to prevent a fracture of the MLG casings and a collapse
of the affected MLG, which could adversely affect the airplane's
continued safe flight and landing.

DATES: This AD is effective October 22, 2008.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of October 22,
2008.
    We must receive comments on this AD by December 8, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Hawker
Beechcraft Corporation, 9709 East Central, Wichita, Kansas 67206.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Griffith, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE-118W, FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office,
1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas
67209; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We have received a report indicating that the main landing gear
(MLG) casings have improper hydrogen embrittlement relief on certain
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model BAe.125 series 800A (including C-
29A and U-125) airplanes, and Hawker Beechcraft Model Hawker 800XP
airplanes. Certain MLG casings did not receive proper hydrogen
embrittlement relief during production. Improper hydrogen embrittlement
relief, if not corrected, could result in a fracture of the MLG casings
and a collapse of the affected MLG, which could adversely affect the
airplane's continued safe flight and landing.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB
32-3920, dated August 2008. The service bulletin describes procedures
for doing an inspection to determine the serial number and part number
on the MLG assembly, and replacing the MLG assembly with a serviceable
MLG assembly if necessary. The service bulletin also specifies to
contact the manufacturer to report if any affected serial number is
found, return spare parts to the manufacturer and report accomplishment
of the service bulletin.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD

    We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
This AD requires accomplishing the actions specified in the service
information described previously, except as discussed under
``Differences Between the Service Bulletin and This AD.''

Differences Between the Service Bulletin and This AD

    Although paragraph 1.D., ``Compliance'' of Hawker Beechcraft
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 32-3920, dated August 2008, specifies a
compliance time of within 200 flight cycles since installation of the
affected MLG assembly, or within 60 days after the receipt of the
service bulletin, whichever occurs first, this AD does not include that
compliance time. We have determined that a compliance time of 30 days
after the effective date of this AD is necessary to address the unsafe
condition. In developing an appropriate compliance time of this AD, we
considered the manufacturer's recommendation, the degree of urgency
associated with the subject unsafe condition, the average utilization
of the affected fleet, and the time necessary to perform the
inspection. The difference has been coordinated with Hawker Beechcraft
Corporation.
    Although the Accomplishment Instructions of Hawker Beechcraft
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 32-3920, dated August 2008, specify the
following actions, this AD does not include those requirements.
     Contact the manufacturer if no affected serial number is
found;
     Return spare parts to the manufacturer; and
     Report accomplishment of the service bulletin.
    The Accomplishment Instructions of Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB 32-3920, dated August 2008, specify to inspect for
serial numbers on the MLG assembly to determine if any MLG assembly
with a serial number identified in Table 1 of the service bulletin is
installed on the airplane. The accomplishment instructions do not
specify an inspection to determine if any part identified in the
``spares'' paragraph 1.A.(2) of the service bulletin is installed. In
order to address all affected parts, this AD requires doing an
inspection to determine if the serial number and part number of the MLG
upper casings are from either Table 1 or paragraph 1.A.(2) of the
service bulletin.

FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date

    Improper hydrogen embrittlement relief of the MLG casings could
result in a fracture of the MLG casings and a

collapse of the affected MLG, which could adversely affect the
airplane's continued safe flight and landing. Because of our
requirement to promote safe flight of civil aircraft and thus, the
critical need to assure the proper functioning of the MLG assembly and
the short compliance time involved with this action, this AD must be
issued immediately.
    Because an unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate
adoption of this AD, we find that notice and opportunity for prior
public comment hereon are impracticable and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to
provide your comments before it becomes effective. However, we invite
you to send any written data, views, or arguments about this AD. Send
your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include
``Docket No. FAA-2008-0976; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-145-AD'' at
the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this
AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may
amend this AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2008-21-01 Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (Formerly Raytheon Aircraft
Company): Amendment 39-15685. Docket No. FAA-2008-0976; Directorate
Identifier 2008-NM-145-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective October 22,
2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model
BAe.125 series 800A (including C-29A and U-125) airplanes, and
Hawker Beechcraft Model Hawker 800XP airplanes, certificated in any
category; having serial numbers identified in Hawker Beechcraft
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 32-3920, dated August 2008.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from a report indicating that the main
landing gear (MLG) casings have received improper hydrogen
embrittlement relief. We are issuing this AD to prevent a fracture
of the MLG casings and a collapse of the affected MLG, which could
adversely affect the airplane's continued safe flight and landing.

Compliance

    (e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

Inspection

    (f) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions specified in paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this AD.
    (1) Do an inspection to determine whether an MLG upper casing,
having a serial number and part number identified in Table 1 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 32-3920, dated August 2008, is installed.
    (2) Do an inspection to determine whether an MLG upper casing,
having a part number and serial number identified in paragraph
1.A.(2) of Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 32-3920,
dated August 2008, is installed.

Replacement

    (g) If any MLG upper casing having a serial number and part
number identified in Table 1 of Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 32-3920, dated August 2008, or in paragraph 1.A.(2) of
the service bulletin, is found during the inspection required by
paragraph (f) of this AD: Within 30 days after the effective date of
this AD, replace the MLG assembly with a serviceable MLG assembly,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Hawker
Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 32-3920, dated August 2008.

Actions Not Required

    (h) Although the Accomplishment Instructions of Hawker
Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 32-3920, dated August 2008,
specify to contact the manufacturer, return spare parts to the
manufacturer, and report accomplishment of the service bulletin to
the manufacturer, this AD does not include those requirements.

Parts Installation

    (i) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install,
on any airplane, a MLG assembly having any serial number identified
in Table 1 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Hawker Beechcraft
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 32-3920, dated August 2008.
    (j) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install,
on any airplane, a MLG assembly having any serial number and part
number identified in paragraph 1.A.(2) of Hawker Beechcraft
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 32-3920, dated August 2008.

Special Flight Permit

    (k) Special flight permits, as described in Section 21.197 and
Section 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199), may be issued to operate the

airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be
accomplished, provided that the flight to the flight service center
is at the minimum allowed weight. Concurrence by the Manager,
Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, is required prior
to issuance of the special flight permit.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (l)(1) The Manager, Wichita ACO, FAA, Attn: William Griffith,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ACE-118W, FAA, Wichita ACO,
1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas
67209; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (m) You must use Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB
32-3920, dated August 2008, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation, 9709 East Central, Wichita, Kansas
67206.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 20, 2008.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-23400 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: December 6, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 234)]
[Notices]
[Page 68951-68952]
[DOCID:fr06de07-125]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2007-44]

Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of certain petitions seeking
relief from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this
notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and participation in,
this aspect of FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this
notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is
intended to affect the legal status of any petition or its final
disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket
number involved and must be received on or before December 26, 2007.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by Docket Number FAA-2007-
26461 using any of the following methods:
     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
 and follow the instructions for sending your

comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to the Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax: Fax comments to the Docket Management Facility at
202-493-2251.
     Hand Delivery: Bring comments to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Docket: To read background documents or comments received,
go to http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to the Docket

Management Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor
at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We will post all comments we receive,
without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal

information you provide. Using the search function of our docket web
site, anyone can find and read the comments received into any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tyneka Thomas<PHONE_NUMBER> or
Frances Shaver<PHONE_NUMBER>, Office of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

Brenda Courtney,
Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petitions for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2007-26461.
    Petitioner: ASU Security, Inc.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 135.203(b) minimum altitudes,
135.205(b) weather minimums, 135.267 flight time limitations, 135.271
rest periods for HEMES crews, and 135.411 maintenance (only as to cargo
hook).
    Description of Relief Sought: To allow ASU Security to operate a
helicopter under contract with the Sonoma County, California, Sheriff's
Department in order to allow the department to seek

reimbursement from the patients it transports.

[FR Doc. E7-23700 Filed 12-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 32467]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14067]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2015-0462]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; China Basin, San Francisco, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the 3rd Street Drawbridge across China
Basin, mile 0.0 at San Francisco, CA. The deviation is necessary to
allow participants to cross the bridge during the San Francisco
Marathon. This deviation allows the bridge to remain in the closed-to-
navigation position during the deviation period.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 6 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on July 26,
2015.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this deviation, [USCG-2015-0462], is
available at http://www.regulations.gov. Type the docket number in the
``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the
line associated with this deviation. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary deviation, call or email David H. Sulouff, Chief, Bridge
Section, Eleventh Coast Guard District; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-
366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The City of San Francisco has requested a
temporary change to the operation of the 3rd Street Drawbridge, mile
0.0, over China Basin, at San Francisco, CA. The drawbridge navigation
span provides a vertical clearance of 3 feet above Mean High Water in
the closed-to-navigation position. The draw opens on signal if at least
one hour notice is given, as required by 33 CFR 117.149. Navigation on
the waterway is recreational.
    The drawspan will be secured in the closed-to-navigation position
from 6 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on July 26, 2015, to allow participants to
cross the bridge during the San Francisco Marathon. This temporary
deviation has been coordinated with the waterway users. No objections
to the proposed temporary deviation were raised.
    Vessels able to pass through the bridge in the closed position may
do so at anytime. The bridge will be able to open for emergencies and
there is no immediate alternate route for vessels to pass. The Coast
Guard will also inform the users of the waterway through our Local and
Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the change in operating schedule for
the bridge so that vessels can arrange their transits to minimize any
impact caused by the temporary deviation.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the effective
period of this temporary deviation. This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: May 28, 2015.
D.H. Sulouff,
District Bridge Chief, Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2015-14067 Filed 6-8-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 117 (Wednesday, June 17, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36575-36576]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13034]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL20-52-000]

Constellation Mystic Power, LLC v. ISO New England, Inc.; Notice
of Complaint

    Take notice that on June 10, 2020, pursuant to sections 206, 306,
and 309 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824e, 825e, and 825h, and
Rule 206 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission)
Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206(b), Constellation
Mystic Power, LLC (Complainant) filed a formal complaint against ISO
New England, Inc., (Respondent), requesting that the Commission
prohibit the Respondent

from (1) implementing an unfiled revision to a planning procedure that
would significantly affect the rates, terms and conditions of
jurisdictional services by dramatically changing the way in which the
Respondent conducts its annual transmission security review of capacity
auction retirement bids and the Network Model upon which the capacity
auction is based, and (2) violating certain requirements of its Tariff,
all as more fully explained in the complaint.
    The Complainant certifies that copies of the complaint were served
on the contacts listed for Respondent in the Commission's list of
Corporate Officials.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically may mail
similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in
docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services,
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on June 30, 2020.

    Dated: June 11, 2020.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-13034 Filed 6-16-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P