[Federal Register: August 12, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 156)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 46811-46813]
[DOCID:fr12au08-5]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 67

Final Flood Elevation Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Base (1% annual chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) and modified
BFEs are made final for the communities listed below. The BFEs and
modified BFEs are the basis for the floodplain management measures that
each community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of being
already in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for
participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

DATES: The date of issuance of the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
showing BFEs and modified BFEs for each community. This date may be
obtained by contacting the office where the maps are available for
inspection as indicated on the table below.

ADDRESSES: The final BFEs for each community are available for
inspection at the office of the Chief Executive Officer of each
community. The respective addresses are listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William R. Blanton, Jr., Engineering
Management Branch, Mitigation

Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) makes the final determinations listed below for the modified
BFEs for each community listed. These modified elevations have been
published in newspapers of local circulation and ninety (90) days have
elapsed since that publication. The Assistant Administrator of the
Mitigation Directorate has resolved any appeals resulting from this
notification.
    This final rule is issued in accordance with section 110 of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR part
67. FEMA has developed criteria for floodplain management in floodprone
areas in accordance with 44 CFR part 60.
    Interested lessees and owners of real property are encouraged to
review the proof Flood Insurance Study and FIRM available at the
address cited below for each community. The BFEs and modified BFEs are
made final in the communities listed below. Elevations at selected
locations in each community are shown.
    National Environmental Policy Act. This final rule is categorically
excluded from the requirements of 44 CFR part 10, Environmental
Consideration. An environmental impact assessment has not been
prepared.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood elevation determinations are
not within the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
    Regulatory Classification. This final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 of September 30, 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR
51735.
    Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This final rule involves no
policies that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
    Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This final rule meets
the applicable standards of Executive Order 12988.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67

    Administrative practice and procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.

0
Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is amended as follows:

PART 67--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 67 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp., p. 376.

Sec.  67.11  [Amended]

0
2. The tables published under the authority of Sec.  67.11 are amended
as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      * Elevation in
                                                                      feet (NGVD)  +
                                                                    Elevation in feet
           Flooding source(s)              Location of referenced   (NAVD)       Communities affected
                                                 elevation            Depth in feet
                                                                      above ground.
                                                                         Modified
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              Codington County, South Dakota and Incorporated Areas
                                             Docket No.: FEMA-B-7755
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
East Branch Roby Creek.................  Approximately 200 feet                +1,767  Unincorporated Areas of
                                          east of 11th Street                           Codington County, City
                                          Northeast.                                    of Watertown.
                                         14th Avenue Northeast....             +1,777
East Branch Roby Creek.................  Approximately 400 feet                +1,760  City of Watertown.
                                          west of 7th Street
                                          Northeast.
                                         Approximately 200 feet                +1,765  Unincorporated Areas of
                                          west of 11th Street                           Codington County.
                                          Northeast.
Lake Kampeska..........................  Approximately 200 feet                +1,725  Unincorporated Areas of
                                          northeast of                                  Codington County, City
                                          intersection of 448th                         of Watertown.
                                          Avenue and U.S. Highway
                                          212.
Lake Kampeska..........................  Approximately 100 feet                +1,725  City of Watertown,
                                          west of intersection of                       Unincorporated Areas of
                                          452nd Avenue and                              Codington County.
                                          Stadheim Drive.
Pelican Lake...........................  Approximately 700 feet                +1,717  Unincorporated Areas of
                                          north of intersection of                      Codington County, City
                                          174th Street and 452nd                        of Watertown.
                                          Avenue.
Pelican Lake...........................  Junction of 21st Street               +1,717  City of Watertown,
                                          SW and 12th Avenue SW.                        Unincorporated Areas of
                                                                                Codington County.
Roby Creek.............................  Approximately 4,500 feet              +1,715  City of Watertown.
                                          downstream from U.S.
                                          Highway 212.
                                         Approximately 100 feet                +1,770
                                          east of U.S. Highway 81.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.

                                                    ADDRESSES

City of Watertown

Maps are available for inspection at the Watertown City Hall, 23 Second St., NE., Watertown, South Dakota 57201.

                                    Unincorporated Areas of Codington County

Maps are available for inspection at the Codington County Planning and Zoning Department, Codington County
 Extension Complex, 1910 West Kemp Avenue, Watertown, South Dakota 57201-3048.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                               Grainger County, Tennessee, and Incorporated Areas
                                             Docket No.: FEMA B-7749
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lea Creek..............................  Approximately 2,800 feet                +913  Unincorporated Areas of
                                          upstream U.S. Highway 11.                     Grainger County.
                                         Approximately 4,200 feet                +913
                                          upstream U.S. Highway 11.
Norris Lake............................  Approximately 5,200 feet               +1032  Unincorporated Areas of
                                          downstream of the                             Grainger County.
                                          confluence of Black Fox
                                          Creek.
                                         Approximately 2,500 feet               +1032
                                          downstream of U.S.
                                          Highway 25.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.

                                                    ADDRESSES

                                     Unincorporated Areas of Grainger County

Maps are available for inspection at Grainger County Courthouse, P.O. Box 126, Rutledge, TN 37861.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: July 25, 2008.
Edward L. Connor,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Insurance, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-18527 Filed 8-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72949-72951]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28969]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-70952; File No. SR-BATS-2013-056]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 12.6 To Conform to FINRA
Rule 5320 Relating to Trading Ahead of Customer Orders

November 27, 2013.

I. Introduction

    On October 3, 2013, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BATS'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'' or ``SEC''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend BATS Rule 12.6 (``Rule
12.6'') to make it substantially similar to Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (``FINRA'') Rule 5320. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the Federal Register on October 22,
2013.\3\ The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This
order approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70662 (October 11,
2013), 78 FR 62828 (SR-BATS-2013-056) (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 12.6, which limits trading
ahead of customer orders by Members,\4\ to have the rule substantially
conform to FINRA Rule 5320.\5\ As with FINRA Rule 5320, the proposed
amendments to Rule 12.6 would prohibit Members from trading ahead of
customer orders, subject to specified exceptions. Rule 12.6, as
proposed to be amended, would include exceptions for large orders and
institutional accounts, proprietary transactions effected by a trading
unit of a Member with no knowledge of customer orders held by another
trading unit of the Member, riskless principal transactions,
intermarket sweep orders (``ISOs''), and odd lot and bona fide error
transactions, described below. Rule 12.6 also would provide the same
guidance as FINRA Rule 5320 with respect to minimum price improvement
standards, order handling procedures, and trading outside normal market
hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Members are registered brokers or dealers that have been
admitted to membership at the Exchange. BATS Rule 1.5(n).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63895 (February 11,
2011), 76 FR 9386 (February 17, 2011) (SR-FINRA-2009-90).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    Current Rule 12.6, the customer order protection rule, generally
prohibits Members from trading on a proprietary basis ahead of, or
along with, customer orders that are executable at the same price as
the proprietary order. The current rule contains several exceptions
that make it permissible for a Member to enter a proprietary order
while representing a customer order that could be executed at the same
price, including permitting transactions for the purpose of
facilitating the execution, on a riskless principal basis, of one or
more customer orders.

Proposal To Adopt Text of FINRA Rule 5320

    To harmonize its rules with FINRA, the Exchange proposes to delete
the current text of Rule 12.6 and its supplementary material and adopt
the text and supplementary material of FINRA Rule 5320, with certain
changes, as Rule 12.6. FINRA Rule 5320 generally provides that a FINRA
member that accepts and holds an order in an equity security for its
own customer, or a customer of another broker-dealer, without
immediately executing the order is prohibited from trading that
security on the same side of the market for its own account at a price
that would satisfy the customer order, unless it immediately thereafter
executes the customer order up to the size and at the same or better
price at which it traded for its own account.

Exceptions

    The proposed amendments to Rule 12.6 would include exceptions to
the prohibition against trading ahead of customer orders. A Member that
meets the conditions of an exception would be permitted to trade a
security on the same side of the market for its own account at a price
that would satisfy a customer order in certain circumstances. The
exceptions are set forth below.

Large Orders and Institutional Accounts

    One exception would permit a Member to negotiate terms and

conditions with respect to the acceptance of certain large-sized orders
(orders of 10,000 shares or more unless such orders are less than
$100,000 in value) or orders from institutional accounts. The term
``institutional account'' would be defined in accordance with FINRA
Rule 4512(c). Accordingly, an institutional account would be defined as
the account of: (1) A bank savings and loan association, insurance
company or registered investment company; (2) an investment adviser
registered either with the SEC under Section 203 of the Investment
Advisers Act or with a state securities commission (or any agency or
office performing like functions); or (3) any other person (whether a
natural person, corporation, partnership, trust or otherwise) with
total assets of at least $50 million. This exception to Rule 12.6, as
amended, would require the Member to provide clear and comprehensive
written disclosure to each customer at account opening and annually
thereafter that: (a) States that the Member may trade proprietarily at
prices that would satisfy the customer order; and (b) provides the
customer with a meaningful opportunity to opt in to the Rule 12.6
protections with respect to all or any portion of its order. In
addition, if a customer does not opt in to the protections with respect
to all or any portion of its order, the Member may reasonably conclude
that such customer has consented to the Member trading a security on
the same side of the market for its own account at a price that would
satisfy the customer's order.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ A customer would retain the right to withdraw consent at any
time. Therefore, a Member's reasonable conclusion that a customer
has consented to the Member trading along with such customer's order
would be subject to further instruction and modification from the
customer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In lieu of providing written disclosure to customers at account
opening and annually thereafter, Rule 12.6 would permit Members to
provide clear and comprehensive oral disclosure to, and obtain consent
from, a customer on an order-by-order basis. Under Rule 12.6, the
Member would be required to document who provided such consent and that
such consent evidences the customer's understanding of the terms and
conditions of the order. If a customer opted in to the protections of
Rule 12.6, a Member could still obtain consent on an order-by-order
basis to trade ahead of or along with an order from that customer,
provided that the Member documented who provided such consent and that
such consent evidenced the customer's understanding of the terms and
conditions of the order.

No-Knowledge Exception

    The Exchange also proposes to include in Interpretation and Policy
.02 a ``no-knowledge'' exception to Rule 12.6. The proposed exception
would allow one trading unit of a Member to trade in a proprietary
capacity and at prices that would satisfy customer orders held by
another, separate trading unit of the Member (``the No-Knowledge
Exception''). The No-Knowledge Exception would be applicable with
respect to NMS stocks, as defined in Rule 600 of Regulation NMS under
the Act.
    To avail itself of the No-Knowledge Exception, a Member would be
required to meet certain conditions. First, it would have to implement
and utilize an effective system of internal controls (such as
appropriate information barriers) that operate to prevent the
proprietary trading unit from obtaining knowledge of the customer
orders held by a separate trading unit. As proposed, Interpretation and
Policy .02 would make clear that appropriate information barriers must,
at a minimum, comply with the Exchange's existing requirements
regarding the prevention of the misuse of material, non-public
information, which are set forth in Exchange Rule 5.5. Second, the
Member would have to provide, at account opening and annually
thereafter, a written description of how it handles customer orders and
the circumstances under which it may trade proprietarily, including in
a market-making capacity, at prices that would satisfy the customer
order. A Member must maintain records indicating which orders rely on
the No-Knowledge Exception and produce these records to the Exchange
upon request. Under the proposed exception, the onus would be on the
Member to produce sufficient documentation justifying reliance on the
No-Knowledge Exception for any given trade. To ensure clarity and
transparency regarding this exception and others, the Exchange will
issue a regulatory notice informing Members of the proposed revisions
to Rule 12.6. The Exchange will include in the regulatory notice the
effective date for the rule as amended, which shall be at least 30 days
after Commission approval of the proposed amendments to Rule 12.6 in
order to allow Members to make any necessary changes to their internal
policies or processes.

Riskless Principal Exception

    Another proposed amendment to Rule 12.6 would not apply to a
proprietary trade made by the Member to facilitate the execution, on a
riskless principal basis, of another order from a customer (whether its
own customer or the customer of another broker-dealer). To take
advantage of this exception, the Member would have to: (a) Submit a
report, contemporaneously with the execution of the facilitated order,
identifying the trade as riskless principal to the Exchange; and (b)
have written policies and procedures to ensure that riskless principal
transactions relied upon for this exception comply with applicable
Exchange rules. At a minimum, these policies and procedures would have
to require: (1) Receipt of the customer order before execution of the
offsetting principal transaction; and (2) execution of the offsetting
principal transaction at the same price as the customer order,
exclusive of any markup or markdown, commission equivalent, or other
fee and allocation to a riskless principal or customer account in a
consistent manner and within 60 seconds of execution.
    Members would have to have supervisory systems in place that
produce records that enable the Member and the Exchange to reconstruct
accurately, readily, and in a time-sequenced manner all orders on which
a Member relies in claiming this exception.

ISO Exception

    A further proposed amendment to Rule 12.6 would exempt a Member
from the obligation to execute a customer order in a manner consistent
with Rule 12.6 with regard to trading for its own account when the
Member routed an ISO in compliance with Rule 600(b)(30)(ii) of
Regulation NMS, if the customer order is received after the Member
routed the ISO. If a Member routes an ISO to facilitate a customer
order, and that customer has consented to not receiving the better
prices obtained by the ISO, the Member would also be exempt with
respect to any trading for its own account that is the result of the
ISO with respect to the consenting customer's order.

Odd Lot and Bona Fide Error Exception

    The Exchange also proposes to except a Member's proprietary trade
that: (1) Offsets a customer odd lot order (i.e., an order less than
one round lot, which is typically 100 shares); or (2) corrects a bona
fide error. With respect to bona fide errors, the Member would be
required to demonstrate and document the basis upon which a transaction
meets the bona fide error exception. For purposes of this proposed
exception, the Exchange would adopt the definition of ``bona fide
error'' found in Regulation NMS's exemption for error correction

transactions.\7\ Thus, a bona fide error would be:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55884 (June 8, 2007), 72
FR 32926, 32927 (June 14, 2007) (Order Exempting Certain Error
Correction Transactions from Rule 611 of Regulation NMS under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (i) The inaccurate conveyance or execution of any term of an order
including, but not limited to, price, number of shares or other unit of
trading; identification of the security; identification of the account
for which securities are purchased or sold; lost or otherwise misplaced
order tickets; short sales that were instead sold long or vice versa;
or the execution of an order on the wrong side of a market; (ii) the
unauthorized or unintended purchase sale or allocation of securities or
the failure to follow specific client instructions; (iii) the incorrect
entry of data into relevant systems, including reliance on incorrect
cash positions, withdrawals, or securities positions reflected in an
account; or (iv) a delay, outage, or failure of a communication system
used to transmit market data prices or to facilitate the delivery or
execution of an order.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Minimum Price Improvement Standards

    The proposed rule change also would establish the minimum amount of
price improvement necessary for a Member to execute an order on a
proprietary basis when holding an unexecuted limit order in that same
security without being required to execute the held limit order.
    In addition, if the minimum price improvement standards set forth
in proposed Interpretation and Policy .06, paragraphs (a) through (g)
would trigger the protection of a pending customer limit order, any
better-priced customer limit order(s) must also be protected under the
amended Rule, even if those better-priced limit orders would not be
directly triggered under these minimum price improvement standards.

Order Handling Procedures

    The proposed rule change would provide that a Member must make
every effort to execute a marketable customer order that it receives
fully and promptly. A Member holding a marketable customer order that
has not been immediately executed would have to make every effort to
cross such order with any other order received by the Member on the
other side of the market, up to the size of such order at a price that
is no less than the best bid and no greater than the best offer at the
time that the subsequent order is received by the Member and that is
consistent with the terms of the orders. If a Member were holding
multiple orders on both sides of the market that have not been
executed, the Member would have to make every effort to cross or
otherwise execute such orders in a manner reasonable and consistent
with the objectives of Rule 12.6, as amended, and with the terms of the
orders. A Member could satisfy the crossing requirement by
contemporaneously buying from the seller and selling to the buyer at
the same price.

Trading Outside Normal Market Hours

    Under the proposed amendments to Rule 12.6, a Member generally
could limit the life of a customer order to the period of normal market
hours of 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. However, if the customer
and Member agreed to the processing of the customer's order outside
normal market hours, the protections of Rule 12.6, as amended, would
apply to that customer's order at all times the customer order is
executable by the Member.

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    After careful review of the proposed rule change, the Commission
finds that the Exchange's proposal is consistent with the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange.\9\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ which
requires that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed,
among other things, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ In approving the BATS proposed rule change, the Commission
has considered its impact on efficiency, competition and capital
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that the proposed rule change, which is
designed to establish a single standard to protect customer orders from
member firms trading ahead of those orders, will help assure the
protection of customer orders without imposing undue regulatory costs
on industry participants. Moreover, the Commission believes that the
proposed rule change will define important parameters by which Members
must abide when trading proprietarily while holding customer orders. In
addition, because the Exchange is proposing to make its customer order
protection rule substantially similar to the customer order protection
rules of FINRA \11\ and other exchanges,\12\ the Commission believes
that the proposed rule change will help reduce the complexity of the
customer order protection rules for those firms subject to these rules.
Taken together, the proposed rule change should provide Members with
clarity and guidance and thereby promote the efficient functioning of
the securities markets.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See FINRA Rule 5320, supra note 5.
    \12\ Several national securities exchanges submitted proposed
rule changes to adopt customer order protection rules that are
substantially similar to FINRA Rule 5320. See, e.g., Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 64418 (May 6, 2011), 76 FR 27735 (May 12,
2011) (SR-CHX-2011-08); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65165
(August 18, 2011), 76 FR 53009 (August 24, 2011) (SR-NYSEAmex-2011-
59); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65166 (August 18, 2011), 76
FR 53012 (August 24, 2011) (SR-NYSEArca-2011-57); Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 69504 (May 2, 2013), 78 FR 26828 (May 8,
2013) (SR-CBOE-2013-027); and Securities Exchange Act Release No.
70011 (July 19, 2013), 78 FR 44994 (July 25, 2013) (SR-CBOE-2013-
074).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\13\ that the proposed rule change (SR-BATS-2013-056) be, and it
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant
to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-28969 Filed 12-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: April 7, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 66)]
[Notices]
[Page 17754]
[DOCID:fr07ap10-68]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2010-0160]

Certificate of Alternative Compliance for the Lift Boat GARY
CHIASSON ELEVATOR

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces that a Certificate of Alternative
Compliance was issued for the lift boat GARY CHIASSON ELEVATOR as
required by 33 U.S.C. 1605(c) and 33 CFR 81.18.

DATES: The Certificate of Alternate Compliance was issued on March 1,
2010.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this notice is available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this
docket on the Internet by going to http://www.regulations.gov,
inserting USCG-2010-0160 in the ``Keyword'' box, and then clicking
``Search.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice,
call CWO2 David Mauldin, District Eight, Prevention Branch, U.S. Coast
Guard, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background and Purpose

    A Certificate of Alternative Compliance, as allowed under Title 33
of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 81 and 89, has been issued
for the lift boat GARY CHIASSON ELEVATOR. The Certificate of
Alternative Compliance permits the masthead light to be offset from the
centerline 6' to port. Placing the masthead light on the centerline as
required by Rule 21 (a) of 72 COLREGS, and Rule 21 (a) of the Inland
Rules Act, would result in a masthead light obstructed by the forward
leg of the lift boat. In addition the sidelights may be located on the
outermost edges of the top of the pilothouse. Due to the pilothouse
being offset to port, the sidelights will also be offset to port. The
port sidelight will be located 16.5' from the centerline and the
starboard sidelight will be located 11.5' from the centerline. Both
sidelights will be located greater than 10% inboard the greatest
breadth of the vessel and 19' forward of the masthead light. Placing
the sidelights in the locations required by Annex I, paragraph 3(b) of
72 COLREGS, and Annex I, paragraph 84.05(b) of the Inland Rules Act
would expose the sidelights to probable damage from the cranes.
Furthermore, the stern light may be located on the main mast above the
pilothouse, 56' forward from the aft end of the vessel. Placing the
stern light closer to the aft end of the vessel as required by Rule 21
(c) of 72 COLREGS, and Rule 21 (c) of the Inland Rules Act, would
result in a stern light location exposed to damage from cargo and crane
activity of the main deck working area of the vessel.
    This notice is issued under authority of 33 U.S.C. 1605(c), and 33
CFR 81.18.

    Dated: March 8, 2010.
    By Direction of the Commander.
J. W. Johnson,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Inspections and Investigations
Branch, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2010-7814 Filed 4-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 5552]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00926]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER17-211-001.
    Applicants: Mid-Atlantic Interstate Transmission, LL, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: MAIT submits response to Deficiency
Letter issued Dec. 28, 2016 in ER17-211-000 to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 1/10/17.
    Accession Number: 20170110-5158.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/31/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-217-001.
    Applicants: Jersey Central Power & Light, PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: JCPL submits response to Deficiency
Letter issued Dec. 28, 2016 in ER17-217-000 to be effective 1/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 1/10/17.
    Accession Number: 20170110-5165.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/31/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-764-000.
    Applicants: Stream Ohio Gas & Electric, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market Based
Rate to be effective 2/20/2017.
    Filed Date: 1/10/17.
    Accession Number: 20170110-5097.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/31/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-765-000.
    Applicants: Stream Energy Illinois, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market Based
Rate to be effective 2/20/2017.
    Filed Date: 1/10/17.
    Accession Number: 20170110-5102.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/31/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-766-000.
    Applicants: Stream Energy Indiana, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market Based
Rate to be effective 2/20/2017.
    Filed Date: 1/10/17.
    Accession Number: 20170110-5104.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/31/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-767-000.
    Applicants: Stream Energy Delaware, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market Based
Rate to be effective 2/20/2017.
    Filed Date: 1/10/17.
    Accession Number: 20170110-5105.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/31/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-768-000.
    Applicants: Stream Energy Connecticut, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market Based
Rate to be effective 2/20/2017.
    Filed Date: 1/10/17.
    Accession Number: 20170110-5108.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/31/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-769-000.
    Applicants: Stream Energy Massachusetts, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market Based
Rate to be effective 2/20/2017.
    Filed Date: 1/10/17.
    Accession Number: 20170110-5111.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/31/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-770-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Calpine NITSA (fka Noble
Americas) Rev 10 to be effective 1/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 1/10/17.
    Accession Number: 20170110-5137.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/31/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: January 10, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-00926 Filed 1-17-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 88 (Monday, May 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20071-20072]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09607]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[9975-98-OEI]

Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision
Approval, State of Tennessee

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's approval of the State of
Tennessee's request to revise one of its EPA-authorized air programs to
allow electronic reporting.

DATES: EPA approves of the State of Tennessee's air authorized program
revision as of May 7, 2018].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Seeh, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop
2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566-
1175, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media
Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) was published in the Federal
Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR.
CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory
alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure
that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper
counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local
government agencies that receive, or wish to begin receiving,
electronic reports under their EPA-authorized programs must apply to
EPA for a revision or modification of those programs and obtain EPA
approval. Subpart D provides standards for such approvals based on
consideration of the electronic document receiving systems that the
state, tribe, or local government will use to implement the electronic
reporting. Additionally, Sec.  3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3,
subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and
modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option
of the state, tribe or local government in place of procedures
available under existing program-specific authorization regulations. An
application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the
state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to
implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered
by the application and will use electronic document receiving systems
that meet the applicable subpart D requirements.
    On March 9, 2018, the Tennessee Department of Environment and
Conservation (TDEC) submitted an application titled ``State and Local
Emissions Inventory System'' for revision to its EPA-approved program
under title 40 CFR to allow new electronic reporting. EPA reviewed
TDEC's request to revise its EPA-authorized Part 52--Approval and
Promulgation of Implementation Plans program and, based on this review,
EPA determined that the application met the standards for approval of
authorized program revision set out in 40 CFR part 3, subpart D. In
accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice of EPA's decision to
approve Tennessee's request to revise/modify its Part 52--Approval and
Promulgation of Implementation Plans program to allow electronic
reporting

under 40 CFR parts 50-52 is being published in the Federal Register.
    TDEC was notified of EPA's determination to approve its application
with respect to the authorized program listed above.

Matthew Leopard,
Director, Office of Information Management.
[FR Doc. 2018-09607 Filed 5-4-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Public Notice of Draft Permit Comment Response New Topic Summ ID Summary Response DocumentID 13 185 The Confederated Salish and Kootenai tribes of the Flathead Indian Reservation respectfully request an extension of the public comment period for the CGP until February 20,2003. The Tribes submit this request for the following reasons: First, the Tribal Point Source Coordinator was away for professional development from the latter part of December, 2002, until this week.

The Coordinator is responsible for review of the proposed CGP, and for coordinating the assessment of its effects on Tribal operations and programs.   EPA believes that fair notice was given on the draft construction general permit and did, in fact, extend the comment period for an additional ten days. EPA received no advanced notice from the commenter about their request to extend the comment period until the actual due date for comments. 1050 13 194 It is important to point out that the current proposed general construction permit is significantly different from the 1998 construction general permit, even though NAHB and other stakeholders had been assured by EPA staff during the proposed ELGs comment period that the soon to be proposed construction general permit would virtually be the same as the 1998 version. However, this tuns out not to be the case, as the proposed

construction general permit has a section titled " Summary of Significant Changes to the 1998 Construction General Permit" that includes no fewer than 17 changes, some of which are indeed significant. As a result,... NAHB is very concerned that the public did not have the opportunity to comment on the proposed ELGs [ Effluent Limitation Guidelines]

with full knowledge of the current general permit proposal. EPA disagrees with the commenter that the public did not have the opportunity to comment on the proposed CGP. EPA believes that the public comment period provided sufficient review and comment opportunity for the proposed CGP. In addition, EPA believes that many of the changes listed were administrative in nature, such as modifying the permit to include eligibility and waiver provisions for small construction activities or to include standard conditions. 1057 1 Public Notice of Draft Permit Comment Response New Topic Summ ID Summary Response DocumentID 13 195 NAHB, also, takes this opportunity to address our concerns with the timing of the proposal. EPA has known since December 1999, that a permit for Phase II had to be in place no later than March 10,2003. Yet EPA waited until December 20,2002, to publish a draft permit, which by EPA's own admission includes significant changes from the 1998 construction general permit, and initially provided a 45 day comment period, which coincided with the holiday period, and which was the Friday before the comments were due on the proposed Effluent Limitation Guidelines and New Source Performance Standards for the Construction and Development Category. When NAHB and other affected parties asked EPA to extend the comment period, EPA extended the comment period for 10 additional days. However, given the significance of the proposed permit, NAHB feels that the public has not been given adequate time to provide meaningful comments to the proposal and is concerned that EPA will make revisions hastily given the deadlines under which EPA must finalize the permit. EPA disagrees with the commenter's assertion that the public was not provided with adequate time for review and comment. In finalizing the CGP, EPA gave full consideration to all comments received during the comment period. EPA's decision to not finalize the CGP prior to the March 10, 2003 deadline to submit applications reflects the Agency's desire to carefully consider public comments and issue a permit reflective of those comments. 1057 2 Public Notice of Draft Permit Comment Response New Topic Summ ID Summary Response DocumentID 13 499 On February 3, 2003, the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes ( Tribes) submitted a request for an extension until February 20, 2003, for comments on the Docket No. OW 2002 0055 General Construction Permit for Storm Water Discharges. The Tribes included in the request a discussion of the reasons and justification for the additional comment time requested. The Tribes were recently advised of the extension of the comment period on Docket OW 2002

0055 until February 13, 2003, but have not received a response to their request for an extension until February 20th. The Tribes will need until February 20,

2003, to determine if the Tribes will have substantive comments on the General Storm Water Permit. We are still evaluating the effects of the proposed permit on Tribal Departments and Programs. If the Tribes determine as a result of these Evaluations that they will need to develop such comments, they will be submitted to Docket ID No. OW 2002 0055 by February 20, 2002. EPA believes that fair notice was given on the draft construction general permit and did, in fact, extend the comment period for an additional ten days. EPA received no advanced notice from the commenter about their request to extend the comment period until the actual due date for comments. 1074 13 JRF1 We suggest that the following language is inserted as a new Subpart in PART 2: AUTHORIZATION FOR DISCHARGES OF STORM WATER FROM CONSTRUCTION SITES as follows: 2.5. Public Participation in NOI Process  The public's opportunity to comment pursuant to 33 USC 1342( a)( 1) was fulfilled by the public comment period which began December 20, 2002, and ended February 13, 2003. EPA agrees with the commenters assertion that the public's opportunity to comment occurs during the general permit issuance process but the Agency disagrees with the commenters request to include that language in the permit.

NPDES permits are written to address specific requirements applicable to the permittees covered by the permit. EPA does not believe that permits should include specific requirements that apply to others who are not the permittee or the permitting authority. 2004 3


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 143 (Thursday, July 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 44945]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17899]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP13-1076-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: BG Energy 911034 11-1-2013 Negotiated Rate to be
effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 7/16/13.
    Accession Number: 20130716-5048.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/29/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP13-1077-000.
    Applicants: Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C.
    Description: PAL Exhibit A Revision to be effective 8/19/2013.
    Filed Date: 7/16/13.
    Accession Number: 20130716-5150.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/29/13.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP13-751-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Response of Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC under.
    Filed Date: 5/30/13.
    Accession Number: 20130530-5167.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/29/13.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 17, 2013.
 Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-17899 Filed 7-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 228 (Monday, November 28, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 85555-85556]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28463]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER17-380-000]

Stored Solar J&WE, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding
Stored Solar J&WE, LLC`s application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is December 12, 2016.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC

Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call (866)
208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 21, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-28463 Filed 11-25-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7158-7159]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01663]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-86, OMB Control No. 3235-0080]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension:
    Rule 12d2-2 and Form 25

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of

extension of the existing collection of information provided for in
Rule 12d2-2 (17 CFR 240.12d2-2) and Form 25 (17 CFR 249.25) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
    On February 12, 1935, the Commission adopted Rule 12d2-2 \1\ and
Form 25, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''), to
establish the conditions and procedures under which a security may be
delisted from an exchange and withdrawn from registration under Section
12(b) of the Act.\2\ The Commission adopted amendments to Rule 12d2-2
and Form 25 in 2005.\3\ Under the adopted Rule 12d2-2, all issuers and
national securities exchanges seeking to delist and deregister a
security in accordance with the rules of an exchange must file the
adopted version of Form 25 with the Commission. The Commission also
adopted amendments to Rule 19d-1 under the Act to require exchanges to
file the adopted version of Form 25 as notice to the Commission under
Section 19(d) of the Act. Finally, the Commission adopted amendments to
exempt standardized options and security futures products from Section
12(d) of the Act. These amendments are intended to simplify the
paperwork and procedure associated with a delisting and to unify
general rules and procedures relating to the delisting process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98 (February 12,
1935).
    \2\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 7011 (February 5,
1963), 28 FR 1506 (February 16, 1963).
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52029 (July 14,
2005), 70 FR 42456 (July 22, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form 25 is useful because it informs the Commission that a security
previously traded on an exchange is no longer traded. In addition, Form
25 enables the Commission to verify that the delisting and/or
deregistration has occurred in accordance with the rules of the
exchange. Further, Form 25 helps to focus the attention of delisting
issuers to make sure that they abide by the proper procedural and
notice requirements associated with a delisting and/or deregistration.
Without Rule 12d2-2 and Form 25, as applicable, the Commission would be
unable to fulfill its statutory responsibilities.
    There are 24 national securities exchanges that could possibly be
respondents complying with the requirements of the Rule and Form 25.\4\
The burden of complying with Rule 12d2-2 and Form 25 is not evenly
distributed among the exchanges, however, since there are many more
securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the NASDAQ Stock
Market, and NYSE American than on the other exchanges. However, for
purposes of this filing, the Commission staff has assumed that the
number of responses is evenly divided among the exchanges. Since
approximately 830 responses under Rule 12d2-2 and Form 25 for the
purpose of delisting and/or deregistration of equity securities are
received annually by the Commission from the national securities
exchanges, the resultant aggregate annual reporting hour burden would
be, assuming on average one hour per response, 830 annual burden hours
for all exchanges (24 exchanges x an average of 34.6 responses per
exchange x 1 hour per response). In addition, since approximately 110
responses are received by the Commission annually from issuers wishing
to remove their securities from listing and registration on exchanges,
the Commission staff estimates that the aggregate annual reporting hour
burden on issuers would be, assuming on average one reporting hour per
response, 110 annual burden hours for all issuers (110 issuers x 1
response per issuer x 1 hour per response). Accordingly, the total
annual hour burden for all respondents to comply with Rule 12d2-2 is
940 hours (830 hours for exchanges + 110 hours for issuers). The total
related internal compliance cost associated with these burden hours is
$201,615 ($166,415 for exchanges plus $35,200 for issuers).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The staff notes that a few of these 24 registered national
securities exchanges only have rules to permit the listing of
standardized options, which are exempt from Rule 12d2-2 under the
Act. Nevertheless, the staff counted national securities exchanges
that can only list options as potential respondents because these
exchanges could potentially adopt new rules, subject to Commission
approval under Section 19(b) of the Act, to list and trade equity
and other securities that have to comply with Rule 12d2-2 under the
Act. Notice registrants that are registered as national securities
exchanges solely for the purposes of trading securities futures
products have not been counted since, as noted above, securities
futures products are exempt from complying with Rule 12d-2-2 under
the Act and therefore do not have to file Form 25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The collection of information obligations imposed by Rule 12d2-2
and Form 25 are mandatory. The response will be available to the public
and will not be kept confidential.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice
to (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii) David Bottom,
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o Cynthia Roscoe, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by
sending an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: Janaury 21, 2021.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-01663 Filed 1-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


http://www.ethanolrfa.org/industry/statistics/

2008 world fuel ethanol production

Country	Millions of Gallons

USA	9000.0

Brazil	6472.2

European Union 	733.6

China	501.9

Canada	237.7

Other	128.4

Thailand	89.8

Colombia	79.29

India	66.0

Australia	26.4

Total	17,335.2

Source: RFA, F.O. Licht 2008 Estimates


USER GUIDE TO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR THE METAL PRODUCTS AND MACHINERY ( MP& M) POINT SOURCE CATEGORY FINAL RULE WATER DOCKET NUMBER: OW 2002 033 ( W 99 23)

April 2003 1 MPM\ MPM11\ USERGUIDEFINAL. wpd USER GUIDE TO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR THE METAL PRODUCTS AND MACHINERY ( MP& M) INDUSTRY POINT SOURCE CATEGORY NODA This guide explains the filing system for the MP& M record and assists users in locating items of interest. The items in the record are organized into sections by topic or subject headings. The outline of the record sections for the MP& M final rule is provided in Attachment 1.

Each section can contain one or more items that relate to a particular subject or topic. Each item in the record has been assigned to an outline section. Some sections may not contain any record items, and are indicated by an asterisk (*) on the record outline. In addition, each item in the record has been assigned a unique document control number ( DCN). In most cases, items are filed in the Water Docket by section and then in numerical order by DCN. Exceptions to this assembly are discussed below. All record items are listed by section in the MP& M record index which is located at the EPA Water Docket, and is described below.

How to Find an Item in the Record To find an item in the record, please review the outline to determine which section may contain the item of interest. Then, review the record index for that section. The record index is the key to locating specific items. The index summarizes certain information for each item, including the section, DCN, subject or title, author, recipient, data and other information. The index for the record includes the following fields in order of appearance:

Field Name Description Section Section number from record outline Site ID Unique site identification number for questionnaire, site visit, and sampling sections DCN Unique document control number ( DCN)

CBI Confidential Business Information ( Yes/ No)

Type Type of Item ( abbreviation code for item types ( e. g., DOC, TEL) See code list in Attachment 2)

Title/ Subject Title or subject of record item Recipient Person that received the item ( First initial, last name and company or organization)

Sender/ Author Author or sender of item ( First initial, last name and company or organization)

Date Date originated or date received Pages Number of pages in item Some record items are related to more than one section of the record. In some cases, a particular item may be referenced in a section which refers the user to the physical location ( in 2 MPM\ MPM11\ USERGUIDEFINAL. wpd another section and by DCN) of the item. For example a computer program may be most closely related to costing ( Section 24.6), but might also concern pollutant loadings information related to Section 24.7. This item would be filed in Section 24.6 and referenced in Section 24.7.

Confidential Business Information The record contains many items that are considered confidential business information ( CBI). CBI items are not available for review by the public, and are not filed in the Water Docket. Some items are classified as CBI because the companies providing them specifically claimed certain information ( e. g., operating or financial data) as CBI. Other items are classified as CBI because release of these items could indirectly reveal information claimed to be confidential. Copies of some CBI or CBI deducible record items have been sanitized for the public record by masking CBI text or removing pages containing CBI. In these cases, placeholder pages have been inserted in the record to indicate that CBI has been removed from the Water Docket ( i. e., public) version of the record.

How to Obtain Site Specific Data Some site specific data, which have been claimed as CBI, are available to the company that submitted the information. To ensure that all CBI is protected in accordance with EPA regulations, any requests for company specific data should be submitted on company letterhead and signed by a responsible official authorized to receive such data. The request must list the specific data requested and include the following statement, " I certify that EPA is authorized to transfer confidential business information submitted by my company, and that I am authorized to receive it." Any such requests for site specific data must be submitted to:

Mr. Carey Johnston U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code 4303T EPA West Room 6231G 1301 Constitution Avenue, N. W. Washington, DC 20004 ( 202) 566 1014 Sampling and Questionnaire ( Survey) Files As discussed above, items are generally filed by DCN within each section. For the survey, site visit, and sampling sections, items are filed by ascending site identification number ( SID). See Sections 5 of the MP& M proposal record and Sections 15 and 17 of the MP& M NODA record for the sampling and questionnaire files.

List of Key Supporting Documents Many users of the record are interested in obtaining information from key supporting documents cited in the final rule. These documents include technical development documents 3 MPM\ MPM11\ USERGUIDEFINAL. wpd and supporting statistical and economic documents. These key supporting documents are listed in Attachment 3 with their DCN and location ( section number) in the record index. Some of the documents cited in the final rule are located in sections of the proposal record ( Sections 1 to 11) or in the NODA record ( Sections 12 to 19). These locations are indicated in Attachment 3.

List of Released CBI Proposal Technical Documents Following the June 5, 2002 publication of the MP& M NODA, some facility CBI was released through requests from EPA and also through Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA) requests. The released documents included technical sections of the MP& M questionnaires. Owners of the CBI may have released all or part of the information in their documents. The non CBI versions of these documents have been inserted in the applicable technical questionnaire ( 5.3) sections of the proposal record. An index for these documents no longer claimed as CBI is provided in Attachment 4. Attachment 1 MP& M RECORD OUTLINE FOR THE FINAL RULE * This section does not contain any record items.

1 RECORD OUTLINE FOR THE MP& M FINAL RULE February 12, 2003 20.0 COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL AND THE NOTICE OF DATA AVAILABILITY ( NODA)

20.1 Industry Correspondence 20.2 Comments Submitted on NODA 20.3 Comment Response Document 20.4 Public Participation 20.4.1 Public Meeting Summaries 20.4.2 Correspondence* 20.4.3 Meeting Reports 20.4.4 Public Hearing Transcript and Related Materials 20.5 Other Federal Agencies' Participation 20.5.1 Correspondence 20.5.2 Meeting Reports* 20.6 Congressional Participation* 20.6.1 Correspondence 20.6.2 Meeting Reports 21.0 FINAL RULE FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES*

21.1 Notices of Public Meetings and Public Hearings 21.2 Notice of Extension of Comment Period and Corrections 21.3 Notices of Data Availability 21.4 Miscellaneous Notices 22.0 FINAL RULE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 22.1 Literature Searches 22.2 Articles, Abstracts, and Reprints 22.3 Vendor Information 23.0 FINAL RULE TECHNICAL DATABASE 23.1 Industry Submitted Data 23.2 Permit Data 23.2.1 Permit Compliance System Data ( PCS) 23.2.2 Additional POTW Data 23.3 Miscellaneous Data Project Files* RECORD OUTLINE FOR THE MP& M FINAL RULE February 12, 2003 ( Continued)

* This section does not contain any record items.

2 24.0 FINAL RULE TECHNICAL DATA INTERPRETATION 24.1 Subcategorization Analysis 24.2 Selection of Pollutants to be Regulated 24.3 Pass Through Analysis 24.4 Technology Options 24.5 Technology Effectiveness Concentrations 24.6 Costs 24.6.1 Development of Cost Model 24.6.2 Cost Results: Individual Sites, Total Category 24.7 Pollutant Loadings and Reductions 24.8 Nonwater Quality Aspects of Pollution Control 25.0 FINAL RULE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 25.1 Economic, Environmental, and Benefit Analysis of the Final Metal Products and Machinery Rule ( EEBA) 25.2 Economic Profile 25.3 Economic Impact Analysis 25.3.1 Private Facility Impact Analysis 25.3.2 Cost Pass Through Analysis 25.3.3 New Source Impact Analysis 25.3.4 Government Facility Impact Analysis 25.3.5 Employment Effects 25.3.6 Foreign Trade Impacts 25.3.7 Small Entity Impacts 25.3.8 Firm Impacts 25.4 Social Costs 25.4.1 POTW Administrative Costs 25.4.2 Social Costs of Unemployment 25.5 Environmental Assessment & Benefits Analysis 25.5.1 National Benefit Analysis <IP_ADDRESS> Human Health Benefits <IP_ADDRESS> Lead Related Benefits <IP_ADDRESS> Recreational Benefits <IP_ADDRESS> POTW Benefits <IP_ADDRESS> Environmental Justice <IP_ADDRESS> Appendices* <IP_ADDRESS> Programs and Results for the National Benefits Analysis RECORD OUTLINE FOR THE MP& M FINAL RULE February 12, 2003 ( Continued)

* This section does not contain any record items.

I:\ MPM\ Mpm11\ USERGUIDEFINAL. wpd 3 25.5.2 Ohio Case Study Analysis <IP_ADDRESS> Literature Sources* <IP_ADDRESS> RUM Analysis <IP_ADDRESS> Benefit Analysis of the Final Rule for the State of Ohio <IP_ADDRESS> Economic Impact Analysis of the Final Rule for the State of Ohio <IP_ADDRESS> Appendices* 25.5.3 Supplementary Analyses 26.0 FINAL RULE COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS FOR ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS 27.0 RULEMAKING PREAMBLE AND TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT 27.1 Notice of Promulgated Rulemaking 27.2 Development Document for Final Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the MP& M Point Source Category 28.0 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS 28.1 Final Limitations and Standards 28.2 Flow Imputations 28.3 Survey Information 28.4 Analytical Review of Data Used for Limits 28.5 Computer Files for Section 28.0 Attachment 2 CODES FOR TYPE OF RECORD ITEM 1 CODES FOR TYPE OF RECORD ITEM TYPES OF ITEMS AGENDA AGR APPEN ART CALC COR DATA DEQ DIAGRAM DISK DMEN DOC DOCX EMAIL ENCL FAX FORM FRN LEN LET LIST LIT MAP MEETING Agenda Agreement Appendix Article Calculation Sheet Correspondence Data Detailed Questionnaire Diagram Disk Document with Enclosure Document Document excerpt Email Enclosure Facsimile Form Federal Register Notice Letter with Enclosure Letter List Literature Map Meeting Notes MEM MEN MISC METH NOENTRY NOTE PAPER PER PHOTO PRINTOUT PSR QUEST REF REG REP SAP SCHEM SER SUM SVR TABLE TEL TEXTBOOK VAR VEND Memoranda Memoranda with Enclosure Miscellaneous Analytical Method No Entry Notes Paper for Conference Permit Photograph/ Slide Printout Press Release Questionnaire/ Survey Reference Regulation Report Sampling & Analysis Plan Schematic Sampling Episode Report Summary Site Visit Report Table Telecon Textbook Variety of Information Vendor Information Attachment 3 KEY SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO THE MP& M FINAL RULE * NOTE: The preamble mistakenly stated DCN 17843 for the post  1996 data instead of DCNs 17882 and 17883.

I:\ MPM\ Mpm11\ USERGUIDEFINAL. wpd 1 KEY SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO THE MP& M FINAL RULE DCN Record Section Reference 17975 27.2 Technical Development Document 37000 25.1 Economic, Environmental, and Benefits Analysis 37900 26.0 Cost Effectiveness Analysis for Alternate Options 17947 20.3 Comment Response Document 16127 11.2 Small Business Advocacy Review Panel Report ( Proposal)

17804 16.0 Changes to Cost and Loading Analyses ( NODA)

17825 24.6.1 Summary of Site Discharge Destination Changes 17826 24.6 Documentation for the Final Site Discharge Destination Table 17844 24.5 Calculation of Local Limit Medians for Pollutants of Concern 17846 24.7 Loadings Methodology for Cost Run 4 17848 24.4 U. S. EPA Position Statement on Enviromental Management Systems ( EMS)

17851 24.7 Benchmark Analysis Using PCS and DMR Data 17882* 23.1 Industry Correspondence Re: Site Discharge Destination or Unit Operation Updates 17883* 20.1 EPA Correspondence Re: Site Discharge Destination 17976 27.1 FRN: MP& M Preamble and Final Rule 20385 <IP_ADDRESS> MRI Study: Brain Development During Childhood and Adolescence ( Proposal) KEY SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO THE MP& M FINAL RULE ( Continued)

* NOTE: The preamble mistakenly stated DCN 17843 for the post  1996 data instead of DCNs 17882 and 17883.

I:\ MPM\ Mpm11\ USERGUIDEFINAL. wpd 2 20416 <IP_ADDRESS> Review of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Lead ( Proposal)

20426 <IP_ADDRESS> Measuring Nonuse Value ( Proposal)

20427 <IP_ADDRESS> Demand for and Value of U. S. Outdoor Recreation ( Proposal)

20431 <IP_ADDRESS> Intrinsic Benefits of Improved Water Quality ( Proposal)

20444 <IP_ADDRESS> Benefit Transfer of Outdoor Recreation Demand ( Proposal)

37500 25.4.1 Comparison Between AMSA and EPA Estimates Attachment 4 LIST OF TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS NO LONGER CLAIMED AS CBI AFTER THE JUNE 5, 2002 NODA Documents No Longer Claimed as CBI After the June 2002 MP& M NODA 2/ 12/ 03 SECTION SID DCN CBI TYPE TITLE RECIPIENT SENDER DATE PAGES <IP_ADDRESS> 77203 03897 FALSE QUEST 1996 SCREENER SURVEY U. S. EPA WELCH ALLYN, INC. 2/ 10/ 97 2 <IP_ADDRESS> 77203 15099 FALSE TEL 1996 SURVEY HELPLINE and/ or FOLLOW UP CONTACTS WELCH ALLYN, INC. ERG Staff 2/ 4/ 97 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 79884 01472 FALSE QUEST 1996 SCREENER SURVEY U. S. EPA THE DONWELL COMPANY 12/ 19/ 96 2 <IP_ADDRESS> 87166 02776 FALSE QUEST 1996 SCREENER SURVEY U. S. EPA PARRIS MANUFACTURING COMPANY 1/ 6/ 97 2 <IP_ADDRESS> 87242 03675 FALSE QUEST 1996 SCREENER SURVEY U. S. EPA CSX TRANSPORTATION INC 1/ 27/ 97 2 <IP_ADDRESS> 88571 06178 FALSE QUEST 1996 SCREENER SURVEY U. S. EPA GRACE MANUFACTURING INC 3/ 7/ 97 2 <IP_ADDRESS> 88571 14872 FALSE TEL 1996 SURVEY HELPLINE and/ or FOLLOW UP CONTACTS GRACE MANUFACTURING INC ERG Staff 5/ 7/ 97 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 89789 03698 FALSE QUEST 1996 SCREENER SURVEY U. S. EPA CSX TRANSPORTATION INC 1/ 27/ 97 2 <IP_ADDRESS> 89789 15056 FALSE TEL 1996 SURVEY HELPLINE and/ or FOLLOW UP CONTACTS CSX TRANSPORTATION INC ERG Staff 1/ 3/ 97 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 77203 08518 FALSE QUEST 1996 LONG DETAILED SURVEY U. S. EPA WELCH ALLYN, INC. 5/ 28/ 98 219 <IP_ADDRESS> 77203 15099 FALSE TEL 1996 SURVEY HELPLINE and/ or FOLLOW UP CONTACTS WELCH ALLYN, INC. ERG Staff 2/ 4/ 97 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 77363 08344 TRUE QUEST 1996 LONG DETAILED SURVEY U. S. EPA LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL INC 11/ 4/ 97 110 <IP_ADDRESS> 82483 08059 TRUE QUEST 1996 LONG DETAILED SURVEY U. S. EPA EMERSON POWER TRANSM CORP 10/ 9/ 97 93 <IP_ADDRESS> 84540 08071 FALSE QUEST 1996 LONG DETAILED SURVEY U. S. EPA PRIME PLATING INC 10/ 7/ 97 133 <IP_ADDRESS> 84540 12852 FALSE TEL 1996 SURVEY HELPLINE and/ or FOLLOW UP CONTACTS PRIME PLATING INC ERG Staff 8/ 20/ 97 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 85953 08338 TRUE QUEST 1996 LONG DETAILED SURVEY U. S. EPA NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBLDG & DRYDOC 11/ 4/ 97 <IP_ADDRESS> 87242 15199 FALSE TEL 1996 SURVEY HELPLINE and/ or FOLLOW UP CONTACTS CSX TRANSPORTATION INC ERG Staff 1/ 3/ 97 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 89789 08325 FALSE QUEST 1996 LONG DETAILED SURVEY U. S. EPA CSX TRANSPORTATION INC 10/ 30/ 97 78 <IP_ADDRESS> 79884 08189 FALSE QUEST 1996 SHORT DETAILED SURVEY U. S. EPA THE DONWELL COMPANY 10/ 9/ 97 <IP_ADDRESS> 79884 15270 FALSE TEL 1996 SURVEY HELPLINE and/ or FOLLOW UP CONTACTS THE DONWELL COMPANY ERG Staff 3/ 20/ 98 <IP_ADDRESS> 87166 08417 FALSE QUEST 1996 SHORT DETAILED SURVEY U. S. EPA PARRIS MANUFACTURING COMPANY 1/ 8/ 98 2 <IP_ADDRESS> 00220 M1121 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing mdcp CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 9/ 12/ 90 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 00220 M1457 FALSE QUES Mini Data Collection Portfolio CONFIDENTIAL 00220 9/ 27/ 90 6 1 Documents No Longer Claimed as CBI After the June 2002 MP& M NODA 2/ 12/ 03 SECTION SID DCN CBI TYPE TITLE RECIPIENT SENDER DATE PAGES <IP_ADDRESS> 01829 M2004 FALSE QUES Mini Data Collection Portfolio CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 9/ 27/ 90 5 <IP_ADDRESS> 02386 M11194 FALSE TEL Clarification of mdcp response CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 10/ 11/ 90 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 02386 M14857 FALSE TEL mdcp form CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 9/ 19/ 90 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 02386 M2185 FALSE QUES Mini Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 02386 9/ 27/ 90 2 <IP_ADDRESS> 02386 M9917 FALSE TEL mdcp form CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 9/ 18/ 90 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 02386 M9922 FALSE TEL mdcp form CONFIDENTIAL 02386 9/ 19/ 90 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 02580 M1320 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing mdcp CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 9/ 6/ 90 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 02580 M2248 FALSE QUES Mini Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 02580 9/ 27/ 90 2 <IP_ADDRESS> 07175 M3775 FALSE QUES Mini Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 07175 9/ 27/ 90 4 <IP_ADDRESS> 08270 M10767 FALSE TEL Clarification of mdcp response CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 10/ 31/ 90 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 08270 M4150 FALSE QUES Mini Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 08270 9/ 27/ 90 2 <IP_ADDRESS> 08329 M4167 FALSE QUES Mini Data Collection Portfolio CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 9/ 27/ 90 5 <IP_ADDRESS> 09272 M10589 FALSE TEL Clarification of mdcp response CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 10/ 29/ 90 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 09272 M4488 FALSE QUES Mini Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 09272 9/ 27/ 90 2 <IP_ADDRESS> 11507 M10388 FALSE TEL Clarification of mdcp response CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 10/ 22/ 90 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 11507 M1133 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing mdcp CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 9/ 11/ 90 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 11507 M5242 FALSE QUES Mini Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 11507 9/ 27/ 90 2 <IP_ADDRESS> 16184 M6724 FALSE QUES Mini Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 16184 9/ 27/ 90 2 <IP_ADDRESS> 19976 M14766 FALSE TEL mdcp form CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 9/ 24/ 90 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 19976 M7994 FALSE QUES Mini Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 19976 9/ 27/ 90 3 <IP_ADDRESS> 00220 M12953 FALSE TEL dcp form CONFIDENTIAL 00220 1/ 14/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 00220 M13861 FALSE TEL Clarification of dcp response CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 6/ 21/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 00220 M13871 FALSE LEN Confirmation of dcp follow up call CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 6/ 24/ 91 2 <IP_ADDRESS> 00220 M15625 FALSE QUES Data Collection Portfolio CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 3/ 1/ 91 <IP_ADDRESS> 01829 M15672 TRUE QUES Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 01829 3/ 25/ 91 308 <IP_ADDRESS> 02386 M11904 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 2/ 5/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 02386 M12193 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 2/ 14/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 02386 M12344 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 2/ 22/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 02386 M15686 FALSE QUES Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 02386 3/ 5/ 91 162 <IP_ADDRESS> 02580 M13047 FALSE TEL dcp form CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 1/ 11/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 02580 M13300 FALSE TEL dcp form CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 1/ 7/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 02580 M13765 FALSE TEL dcp form CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 1/ 11/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 02580 M15697 FALSE QUES Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 02580 3/ 25/ 91 171 <IP_ADDRESS> 07175 M11958 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 2/ 7/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 07175 M12488 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 3/ 7/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 07175 M12497 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 3/ 8/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 07175 M12522 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 3/ 12/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 07175 M12582 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 3/ 22/ 91 1 2 Documents No Longer Claimed as CBI After the June 2002 MP& M NODA 2/ 12/ 03 SECTION SID DCN CBI TYPE TITLE RECIPIENT SENDER DATE PAGES <IP_ADDRESS> 07175 M13594 FALSE LET Extension for completing dcp CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 3/ 27/ 91 4 <IP_ADDRESS> 07175 M13697 FALSE TEL Assist in completing mdcp CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 5/ 14/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 07175 M13790 FALSE TEL dcp form CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 1/ 29/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 07175 M15896 FALSE QUES Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 07175 7/ 3/ 91 2307 <IP_ADDRESS> 08270 M11441 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 1/ 10/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 08270 M12004 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp 08270 CONFIDENTIAL 2/ 8/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 08270 M12108 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp 08270 CONFIDENTIAL 2/ 12/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 08270 M13572 FALSE LET Site contact person 08270 CONFIDENTIAL 2/ 28/ 91 2 <IP_ADDRESS> 08270 M15143 FALSE TEL Clarification of dcp response 08270 CONFIDENTIAL 1/ 9/ 92 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 08270 M15148 FALSE LEN Confirmation of dcp follow up call 08270 CONFIDENTIAL 1/ 10/ 92 2 <IP_ADDRESS> 08270 M15942 FALSE QUES Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 08270 3/ 1/ 91 862 <IP_ADDRESS> 08329 M15944 TRUE QUES Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 08329 3/ 4/ 91 308 <IP_ADDRESS> 09272 M11788 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp 09272 CONFIDENTIAL 1/ 31/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 09272 M11888 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp 09272 CONFIDENTIAL 2/ 5/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 09272 M11912 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp 09272 CONFIDENTIAL 2/ 6/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 09272 M11959 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp 09272 CONFIDENTIAL 2/ 7/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 09272 M12885 FALSE TEL dcp form 09272 CONFIDENTIAL 1/ 25/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 09272 M15980 FALSE QUES Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 09272 2/ 26/ 91 73 <IP_ADDRESS> 11507 M11503 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp 11507 CONFIDENTIAL 1/ 16/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 11507 M11546 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp 11507 CONFIDENTIAL 1/ 17/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 11507 M12175 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp 11507 CONFIDENTIAL 2/ 14/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 11507 M12486 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp 11507 CONFIDENTIAL 3/ 7/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 11507 M13530 FALSE LET Extension for completing dcp 11507 CONFIDENTIAL 2/ 11/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 11507 M14011 FALSE LET dcp form 11507 CONFIDENTIAL 1/ 18/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 11507 M14225 FALSE TEL Clarification of dcp response 11507 CONFIDENTIAL 8/ 8/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 11507 M15387 FALSE TEL dcp form 11507 CONFIDENTIAL 3/ 16/ 92 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 11507 M16066 FALSE QUES Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 11507 3/ 8/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 16184 M11450 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp 16184 CONFIDENTIAL 1/ 10/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 16184 M11901 FALSE TEL Assistance in completing dcp 16184 CONFIDENTIAL 2/ 5/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 16184 M13207 FALSE TEL Clarification of dcp response 16184 CONFIDENTIAL 5/ 14/ 91 3 <IP_ADDRESS> 16184 M13211 FALSE TEL Clarification of dcp response 16184 CONFIDENTIAL 5/ 16/ 91 3 <IP_ADDRESS> 16184 M13740 FALSE LEN Confirmation of dcp follow up call 16184 CONFIDENTIAL 5/ 30/ 91 8 <IP_ADDRESS> 16184 M13741 FALSE TEL Clarification of dcp response 16184 CONFIDENTIAL 5/ 30/ 91 1 <IP_ADDRESS> 16184 M16254 FALSE QUES Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 16184 2/ 21/ 91 134 <IP_ADDRESS> 19976 M16416 FALSE QUES Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 19976 5/ 2/ 91 260 <IP_ADDRESS> 24748 M16634 FALSE QUES Data Collection Portfolio U. S. EPA 24748 2/ 21/ 91 64 3


     UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

                             OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFTEY
AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

RE:  	Meeting with Henkel and EPA to discuss conditions of use for phthalates

List of Documents
 Meeting Summary
 Attendees
Meeting Summary
On December 9, 2019, EPA spoke with Henkel to discuss use information on phthalates. EPA provided a general overview of the prioritization and risk evaluation process under TSCA section 6. Henkel discussed phthalates used in their products including information on uses for dibutyl phthalate (DBP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP), dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP), di-isobutyl phthalate (DIBP) and phthalic anhydride.

Attendees
EPA:
Doug Parsons
Lea Carmichael
Peter Gimlin
Bethany Masten
Alex Smith
Claire Brisse
Victoria Ellenbogen
Jordan Garbin

Henkel:
Senthil Pichandi
Jennifer Altman
Martina Werner