[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 12, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 67321-67323]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26936]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No.FAA-2013-0942; Notice No. 25-13-30-SC]

Special Conditions: Bombardier Aerospace Inc., Models BD-500-1A10
and BD-500-1A11 Series Airplanes; Autobraking System Loads

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for the Bombardier
Aerospace Inc. Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 series airplanes.
These airplanes will have novel or unusual design features associated
with the autobraking system for use during landing. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for this design feature. These proposed special conditions
contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that
established by the existing airworthiness standards.

DATES: Send your comments on or before December 27, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2013-0942
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov/and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC, 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to http://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477- 19478), as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Freisthler, FAA, Airframe and
Cabin Safety Branch, ANM-115 Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft

Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington, 98057-
3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
    We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing
date for comments. We may change these special conditions based on the
comments we receive.

Background

    On December 10, 2009, Bombardier Inc. applied for a type
certificate for their new Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 series
airplanes (hereafter collectively referred to as ``C-series''). The C-
series airplanes are swept-wing monoplanes with a pressurized cabin.
They share an identical supplier base and significant common design
elements. The fuselage is an aluminum alloy material, blended double-
bubble design, sized for nominal 5-abreast seating. Each airplane's
powerplant consists of two under wing Pratt and Whitney PW1524G ultra-
high bypass, geared turbofan engines. Flight controls are fly-by-wire
systems with two passive/uncoupled side sticks. Avionics include five
landscape primary cockpit displays. The dimensions of the airplanes
encompass a wingspan of 115 feet; a height of 37.75 feet; and a length
of 114.75 feet for the Model BD-500-1A10 and 127 feet for the Model BD-
500-1A11. Passenger capacity is designated as 110 for the Model BD-500-
1A10 and 125 for the Model BD-500-1A11. Maximum takeoff weight is
131,000 pounds for the Model BD-500-1A10 and 144,000 pounds for the
Model BD-500-1A11. Maximum takeoff thrust is 21,000 pounds for the
Model BD-500-1A10 and 23,300 pounds for the Model BD-500-1A11. Range is
3,394 miles (5,463 kilometres) for both models of airplanes. Maximum
operating altitude is 41,000 feet for both models of airplanes.

Type Certification Basis

    Under the provisions of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR) 21.17, Bombardier Inc. must show that the C-series airplanes meet
the applicable provisions of part 25 as amended by Amendments 25-1
through 25-129.
    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the C-series airplanes because of a
novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under the provisions of Sec.  21.16.
    Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar
novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also
apply to the other model under Sec.  21.101.
    In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the C-series airplanes must comply with the fuel vent and
exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36, and the FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under Sec.  611 of Public Law 92-574,
the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
    The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec.  11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec.  21.17(a)(2).

Novel or Unusual Design Features

    The C-series airplanes will incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features: The C-series airplanes possess an autobrake
system. This is a pilot-selectable function that allows earlier maximum
braking at landing without pilot pedal input. When the autobrake system
is armed before landing, it automatically commands maximum braking at
main wheels touchdown. Normal procedures remain unchanged and call for
manual braking after nose wheel touchdown.

Discussion

    Section 25.493 addresses braked roll loads but does not contain a
specific ``pitchover'' requirement addressing the loading on the nose
gear, the nose gear surrounding structure, and the forward fuselage.
Moreover, Sec.  25.493 specifies airplane attitudes in accordance with
figure 6 of appendix A to part 25, which are level landing attitudes.
For airplanes with traditional braking systems, the current ground load
requirements are considered adequate for the design of the nose gear
and airframe structure. However, the C-Series airplane autobrake
system, which could apply maximum braking at the main wheels with the
airplane in a tail-down attitude well before the nose touches down,
will cause a high nose gear sink rate and potentially higher gear and
airframe loads.
    Part 25 does not contain adequate requirements to address the
potentially higher structural loads that could result from this type of
braking system. In addition, the effects on fatigue covered by Sec.
25.571 also need to be considered. Therefore, FAA has determined that
additional airworthiness standards are needed for the certification of
this unusual design feature. These special conditions propose
airworthiness standards for the certification of the C-series airplanes
with an autobrake system.

Applicability

    As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 series airplanes. Should Bombardier
Inc. apply at a later date for a change to the type certificate to
include another model incorporating the same novel or unusual design
feature, the special conditions would apply to that model as well.

Conclusion

    This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one series of airplanes. It is not a rule of general applicability.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
    The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.

The Proposed Special Conditions

    Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of the type certification basis
for Bombardier Inc. Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 series
airplanes.

Autobraking System Loads

    A landing pitchover condition must be addressed that takes into
account the effect of the autobrake system. The airplane is assumed to
be at the design maximum landing weight, or at the maximum weight
allowed with the autobrake system on. The airplane is assumed to land
in a tail-down attitude at the speeds defined by Sec.  25.481.
Following main gear contact, the airplane is assumed to rotate about
the main gear wheels at the highest pitch rate generated by the
autobrake system. This is considered a limit load condition from which
ultimate loads must also be determined. Loads must be determined for a
critical fuel and payload distribution and centers of

gravity. Nose gear loads, as well as airframe loads, must be
determined. The airplane must support these loads as described in Sec.
25.305.
    In addition to the above airworthiness standards, fatigue loads
must also be determined and applied in accordance to Sec.  25.571.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 1, 2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-26936 Filed 11-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62540-62541]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24803]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-D-0530]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Q-Submission Program
for Medical Devices

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by
December 16, 2019.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0756.
Also include the FDA docket number found

in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amber Sanford, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.

Q-Submission Program for Medical Devices

OMB Control Number 0910-0756--Extension

    The guidance entitled ``Requests for Feedback and Meetings for
Medical Device Submissions: The Q-Submission Program'' (https://www.fda.gov/media/114034/download) provides an overview of the
mechanisms available to submitters through which they can request
feedback from or a meeting with FDA regarding certain potential or
planned medical device submissions reviewed by the Center for Devices
and Radiological Health (CDRH) and the Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research (CBER). The guidance provides recommendations regarding
certain types of Q-Submissions, such as Pre-Submissions, Submission
Issue Requests, Study Risk Determinations, Informational Meetings, and
other Q-Submissions Types and other uses of the Q-Submission Program.
    For clarity and consistency with the guidance that describes the
program, we are requesting that the title of the information collection
request, OMB control number 0910-0756, be changed to ``Q-Submission
Program for Medical Devices.''
    In the Federal Register of August 13, 2019 (84 FR 40069), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. No comments were received.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                 Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Annual
           FDA Center                Number of    frequency  per   Total annual      Hours per      Total hours
                                    respondents      response        responses       response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CDRH............................           3,502               1           3,502             137         479,774
CBER............................              91               1              91             137          12,467
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
    Total.......................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         492,241
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance cost associated with this of information.

    Respondents are medical device manufacturers subject to FDA's laws
and regulations. FDA's annual estimate of 3,593 submissions is based on
experienced recent trends. FDA's administrative and technical staffs,
who are familiar with Q-Submissions, estimate that an average of 137
hours is required to prepare a Q-Submission.
    Our estimated burden for the information collection reflects an
overall increase of 143,713 hours. We attribute this adjustment to an
increase in the number of submissions we received based on FY18 data.

    Dated: November 6, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-24803 Filed 11-14-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 187 (Thursday, September 26, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59293-59295]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23456]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0830; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-128-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by a report of cracking in the fuselage skin underneath the
satellite communication (SATCOM) antenna adapter. This proposed AD
would require repetitive inspections of the visible fuselage skin and
doubler if installed, for cracking, corrosion, and any indication of
contact of a certain fastener to a bonding jumper, and repair if
necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracking and
corrosion in the fuselage skin, which could lead to rapid decompression
and loss of structural integrity of the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 12,
2013.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.
O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425
227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melanie Violette, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0830;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-128-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We received a report of cracking and corrosion in the fuselage skin
underneath the SATCOM antenna adapter. During a maintenance planning
data inspection, one operator reported a 16-inch crack under the 3-bay
SATCOM antenna adapter plate in the crown skin of the fuselage on an
airplane that was 14 years old with approximately 14,000 total flight
cycles. Subsequent to this crack finding, the same operator inspected
42 other airplanes that are between 6 and 16 years old and found some
local corrosion, but no other cracking. Cracking and corrosion in the
fuselage skin, if not corrected, could lead to rapid decompression and
loss of structural integrity of the airplane.

Relevant Service Information

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0068, dated June
12, 2013. For information on the procedures and compliance times, see
this service information at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for
Docket No. FAA-2013-0830.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously, except as discussed
under ``Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service
Information.''

Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service Information

    The service bulletin specifies to contact the manufacturer for
instructions on how to repair certain conditions, but this proposed AD
would require repairing those conditions in one of the following ways:
     In accordance with a method that we approve; or
     Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) whom we have
authorized to make those findings.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 120 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
              Action                    Labor cost        Parts cost    Cost per product          operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection.......................  Up to 36                       $0  Up to $3,060 per      Up to $367,200 per
                                    work[dash]hours x                  inspection cycle.     inspection cycle.
                                    $85 per hour =
                                    $3,060 per
                                    inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2013-0830; Directorate Identifier
2013-NM-128-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by November 12, 2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200, -200LR, -
300, -300ER, and -777F series airplanes, certificated in any
category, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
53A0068, dated June 12, 2013.

 (d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report of cracking in the fuselage
skin underneath the satellite communication (SATCOM) antenna
adapter. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking and
corrosion in the fuselage skin, which could lead to rapid
decompression and loss of structural integrity of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Repetitive Inspections

    (1) For Group 1-4 airplanes and Group 5, Configuration 3 and 4
airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0068,
dated June 12, 2013: Except as required by paragraphs (h)(1) and
(h)(2) of this AD, within the applicable compliance times specified
in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
777-53A0068, dated June 12, 2013, do internal detailed and surface
high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections of the visible
fuselage skin, and doubler if installed, for cracking; do external
detailed and surface HFEC inspections of the visible fuselage skin,
and doubler if installed, for cracking, corrosion, and any
indication that shows a contact of a certain fastener to a bonding
jumper; and do all applicable repairs; in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
53A0068, dated June 12, 2013, except as required by paragraph (h)(3)
of this AD. Thereafter, repeat the inspections at the applicable
intervals specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0068, dated June 12, 2013. Do all
applicable repairs before further flight.
    (2) For Group 5, Configuration 1, 2, and 5 airplanes identified
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0068, dated June 12, 2013:
No action is required by this AD.

(h) Exceptions to the Service Information

    (1) The ``Condition Questionnaire'' column in Tables 1, 5, and 9
of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
777-53A0068, dated June 12, 2013, refers to airplanes with certain
conditions ``at the time of the original issue date of this service
bulletin.'' For this AD, use ``as of the effective date of this AD''
instead of ``at the time of the original issue date of this service
bulletin.''
    (2) Where paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 777-53A0068, dated June 12, 2013, specifies a
compliance time ``after the original issue date of this service
bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within the specified
compliance time after the effective date of this AD.
    (3) If any crack, corrosion, or indication that shows a contact
of the fastener attaching the SATCOM lug adapter plate to the
bonding plate is found during any inspection required by this AD,
and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0068, dated June 12, 2013,
specifies to contact Boeing for repair instructions: Before further
flight, repair using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this AD.

 (i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.

(j) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Melanie
Violette, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM 120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057 3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 18, 2013.
Ross Landes,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-23456 Filed 9-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: August 22, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 162)]
[Notices]
[Page 46981]
[DOCID:fr22au07-73]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP97-81-039]

Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC; Notice of
Compliance Filing

August 15, 2007.
    Take notice that on August 3, 2007 Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas
Transmission LLC (KMIGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1-A, the following tariff sheets, to
be effective August 3, 2007:

Original Sheet No. 4G.02.
Original Sheet No. 4N.

    KMIGT states that the tariff sheets are being filed in compliance
with the Commission's December 31, 1996 ``Order Accepting Tariff Filing
Subject to Conditions'' in Docket No. RP97-81 (77 FERC ] 61,350) and
the Commission's Letter Orders dated March 28, 1997 and November 30,
2000 in Docket Nos. RP97-81-001 and RP01-70-000, respectively.
    KMIGT states that a copy of this filing has been served upon all
parties to this proceeding, KMIGT's customers and affected state
commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of section 154.210 of
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-16495 Filed 8-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 19 (Monday, January 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5871-5872]
[FR Doc No: 2023-01856]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: PR23-24-000.
    Applicants: Questar Gas Company.
    Description: Questar Gas Company submits tariff filing per
284.123(b),(e)/: Rate changes 2023 corrected date to be effective 1/1/
2023.
    Filed Date: 01/20/2023.
    Accession Number: 20230120-5208.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/10/23.

    Docket Numbers: RP23-369-000.
    Applicants: Northwest Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Non-Conforming Service
Agreement--Citadel Contract Termination to be effective 2/22/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/23/23.
    Accession Number: 20230123-5151.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/6/23.

    Docket Numbers: RP23-370-000.
    Applicants: Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Spire Negotiated Rate--Feb
2023 to be effective 2/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/23/23.
    Accession Number: 20230123-5157.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/6/23.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but

intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: January 24, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-01856 Filed 1-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: December 26, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 246)]
[Notices]
[Page 73050]
[DOCID:fr26de07-106]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 0-2, Form ADV-NR; SEC File No. 270-214; OMB Control No. 3235-
0240.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a
request for extension of the previously approved collection of
information discussed below.
    The title for the collection of information is ``Rule 0-2'' (17 CFR
275.0-2) and ``Form ADV-NR'' (17 CFR 279.4) under the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-1). Rule 0-2 and Form ADV-NR
facilitate service of process to non-resident investment advisers and
their non-resident general partners or non-resident managing agents.
The Form requires these persons to designate the Commission as agent
for service of process. The purpose of this collection of information
is to enable the commencement of legal and/or regulatory actions
against investment advisers that are doing business in the United
States, but are not residents.
    The respondents to this information collection would be each non-
resident general partner or non-resident managing agent of an SEC-
registered adviser. The Commission has estimated that compliance with
the requirement to complete Form ADV-NR imposes a total burden of
approximately 1 hour for an adviser. Based on our experience with these
filings, we estimate that we will receive 18 Form ADV-NR filings
annually. Based on the 1.0 hour per respondent estimate, the Commission
staff estimates a total annual burden of 18 hours for this collection
of information.
    Rule 0-2 and Form ADV-NR do not require recordkeeping or records
retention. The collection of information requirements under the rule
and form are mandatory. The information collected pursuant to the rule
and Form ADV-NR is a filing with the Commission. This filing is not
kept confidential and must be preserved until at least three years
after termination of the enterprise. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid control number.
    General comments regarding the above information should be directed
to the following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New
Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503 or e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/

Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O
Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or
send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to
OMB within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: December 17, 2007.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-24885 Filed 12-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 10, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31854-31855]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14663]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0217; Airspace Docket No. 17-ASO-4]
RIN 2120-AA66

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Ellijay, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface at Ellijay, GA, to accommodate new area
navigation (RNAV) global positioning system (GPS) standard instrument
approach procedures serving Gilmer County Airport. Controlled airspace
is necessary for the safety and management of instrument flight rules
(IFR) operations at this airport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, September 13, 2018. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed on line at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11B at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group,

Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701 Columbia
Ave., College Park, GA 30337; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This proposed rulemaking is promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part, A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under
that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign
the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it establishes Class E airspace at Gilmer County Airport,
Ellijay, GA, to support IFR operations in standard instrument approach
procedures at this airport.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (83 FR 14608, April 5, 2018) for Docket No. FAA-2018-0217 to
establish Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface at Gilmer County Airport, Ellijay, GA. Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.11B dated August 3, 2017, and effective September 15,
2017, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The Class
E airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017, and effective September 15,
2017. FAA Order 7400.11B is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11B lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 establishes Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface within a 7.3-mile radius of Gilmer County Airport,
Ellijay, GA providing the controlled airspace required to support the
new RNAV (GPS) standard instrument approach procedures for the airport.
These changes are necessary for continued safety and management of IFR
operations at the airport.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified
that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11B,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017,
effective September 15, 2017, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASO GA E5 Ellijay, GA [New]

Gilmer County Airport, GA
    (Lat. 34[deg]37'42'' N, long. 84[deg]31'36'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7.3-mile radius of Gilmer County Airport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on July 2, 2018.
Ryan W. Almasy,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2018-14663 Filed 7-9-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59467-59468]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23563]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0521; Directorate Identifier 2014-NE-11-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; CFM International S.A. Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
CFM International (CFM) S.A. CFM56-7B series turbofan engines. This
proposed AD was prompted by a dual engine thrust instability event that
resulted in the overspeed and in-flight shutdown (IFSD) of one engine.
This proposed AD would require modification of the engine by removing
full authority digital engine control (FADEC) software, version 7BV4 or
earlier, installed in the electronic engine controls (EECs) on CFM56-7B
engines. We are proposing this AD to prevent a thrust instability
event, which could lead to overspeed and IFSD of one or more engines,
loss of thrust control, damage to the engine, and damage to the
airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 1,
2014.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact CFM
International Inc., Aviation Operations Center, 1 Neumann Way, M/D Room
285, Cincinnati, OH 45125; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>You may view this service information at the
FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0521; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Caufield, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0521;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NE-11-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We have received reports of dual engine thrust instability events
on CFM56-7B turbofan engines that resulted in overspeed and IFSD of one
engine. These resulted from water-borne fuel contamination of the fuel
supply causing a lag in the response of the control valve in the fuel
metering unit (FMU). CFM has improved its FADEC software to help
prevent the lag in the response of the FMU control valve, thereby
mitigating these thrust instability events. This condition, if not
corrected, could lead to overspeed and IFSD of one or more engines,
loss of thrust control, damage to the engine, and damage to the
airplane.

Relevant Service Information

    We reviewed CFM Service Bulletin (SB) No. CFM56-7B S/B 73-0203,
dated June 9, 2014, and CFM SB No. CFM56-7B S/B 73-0204, dated June 9,
2014. The SBs describe procedures for the introduction of new FADEC
software for the EECs.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require modification of the engine by
removing FADEC software, version 7BV4 or earlier, installed in the EECs
on CFM56-7B engines.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect about 2,921 engines
installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 1 hour per product to comply with this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per hour. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $248,285.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. Amend Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

CFM International S.A.: Docket No. FAA-2014-0521; Directorate
Identifier 2014-NE-11-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by December 1, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all CFM International (CFM) S.A. CFM56-7B
series turbofan engines.

(d) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a dual engine thrust instability event
that resulted in the overspeed and in-flight shutdown (IFSD) of one
engine. We are issuing this AD to prevent a thrust instability
event, which could lead to overspeed and IFSD of one or more
engines, loss of thrust control, damage to the engine, and damage to
the airplane.

(e) Compliance

    (1) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
    (2) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, modify
the engine by removing full authority digital engine control (FADEC)
software, version 7BV4 or earlier, installed in the electronic
engine controls.

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, may approve AMOCs
to this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request.

(g) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Barbara
Caufield, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) CFM Service Bulletin (SB) No. CFM56-7B S/B 73-0203, dated
June 9, 2014, and CFM No. SB CFM56-7B S/B 73-0204, dated June 9,
2014, which are not incorporated by reference in this proposed AD,
can be obtained from CFM using the contact information in paragraph
(g)(3) of this proposed AD.
    (3) For service information identified in this proposed AD,
contact CFM International Inc., Aviation Operations Center, 1
Neumann Way, M/D Room 285, Cincinnati, OH 45125; phone: 877-432-
3272; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on September 25, 2014.
Ann C. Mollica,
Acting Directorate Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-23563 Filed 10-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P