[Federal Register: July 13, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 133)]
[Notices]
[Page 39954]
[DOCID:fr13jy10-86]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0274]

Oversight of Laboratory Developed Tests; Public Meeting; Change
of Meeting Location

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a change
in location for the upcoming public meeting entitled ``Oversight of
Laboratory Developed Tests.'' A new address is given for those
attending the public meeting.

DATES: The public meeting will be held on July 19 and 20, 2010, from 8
a.m. to 5 p.m. each day.

ADDRESES: The public meeting will be held at The Marriott Inn &
Conference Center, University of Maryland University College, 3501
University Blvd. E, Hyattsville, MD 20783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Serrano, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66., rm 5613, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-6652, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In the Federal Register of June 17, 2010 (75 FR 34463), FDA
published a notice announcing a public meeting that is intended to
create a forum for interested stakeholders to discuss the agency's
oversight of laboratory developed tests. FDA announced in the notice
that it is seeking input and requesting comments on this topic. The
June 17, 2010, notice invited individuals interested in presenting to
register by July 12, 2010. Registration to present at the public
meeting is closed. All others are welcome to attend on a first-come,
first-served basis.
    Because of greater than anticipated response for attending the
public meeting, FDA is announcing in this notice a new location for the
public meeting.

II. New Location for the Public Workshop

    The new location will be The Marriott Inn & Conference Center,
University of Maryland University College (see ADDRESSES). Directions
and information on parking, accommodations, and transportation options
can be found at: http://www.marriott.com/hotels/travel/wasum-the-
marriott-inn-and-conference-center-university-of-maryland-university-
college/.

    Dated: July 7, 2010.
Nancy Stade,
Acting Associate Director for Regulations and Policy, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-16974 Filed 7-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register: August 1, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 147)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 41906-41909]
[DOCID:fr01au07-11]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52 and 81

[EPA-R03-OAR-2007-0245; FRL-8446-9]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Redesignation of the Altoona 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment
Area to Attainment and Approval of the Area's Maintenance Plan and 2002
Base Year Inventory

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) is requesting that the
Altoona 8-hour ozone nonattainment area (``Altoona Area'' or ``Area'')
be redesignated as attainment for the 8-hour ozone ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS). The Area is comprised of Blair County, Pennsylvania.
EPA is approving the ozone redesignation request for Altoona Area. In
conjunction with its redesignation request, PADEP submitted a SIP
revision consisting of a maintenance plan for Altoona Area that
provides for continued attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS for at
least 10 years after redesignation. EPA is approving the 8-hour
maintenance plan. PADEP also submitted a 2002 base year inventory for
the Altoona Area which EPA is approving. In addition, EPA is approving
the adequacy determination for the motor vehicle emission budgets
(MVEBs) that are identified in the Altoona Area maintenance plan for
purposes of transportation conformity, and is approving those MVEBs.
EPA is approving the redesignation request, and the maintenance plan
and the 2002 base year emissions inventory as revisions to the
Pennsylvania SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air
Act (CAA).

DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on August 1, 2007
pursuant to the authority of 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1).

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2007-0245. All documents in the docket are listed in
the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the electronic

docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard

copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State
submittal are available at the Pennsylvania Department of Environment
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market
Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Caprio,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by e-
mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On June 7, 2007 (72 FR 31495), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The NPR proposed
approval of Pennsylvania's redesignation request, a SIP revision that
establishes a maintenance plan for the Altoona Area that provides for
continued attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS for at least 10 years
after redesignation, and a 2002 base year emissions inventory. The
formal SIP revisions were submitted by

PADEP on February 8, 2007. Other specific requirements of
Pennsylvania's redesignation request SIP revision for the maintenance
plan and the rationales for EPA's proposed actions are explained in the
NPR and will not be restated here. No public comments were received on
the NPR.
    However, on December 22, 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit vacated EPA's Phase 1 Implementation Rule
for the 8-hour Ozone Standard. (69 FR 23951, April 30, 2004). South
Coast Air Quality Management Dist. v. EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (D.C. Cir.
2006). On June 8, 2007, in South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. v.
EPA, Docket No. 04-1201, in response to several petitions for
rehearing, the D. C. Circuit clarified that the Phase 1 Rule was
vacated only with regard to those parts of the rule that had been
successfully challenged. Therefore, the Phase 1 Rule provisions related
to classifications for areas currently classified under subpart 2 of
Title I, part D of the Act as 8-hour nonattainment areas, the 8-hour
attainment dates and the timing for emissions reductions needed for
attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS remain effective. The June 8
decision left intact the Court's rejection of EPA's reasons for
implementing the 8-hour standard in certain nonattainment areas under
subpart 1 in lieu of subpart 2. By limiting the vacatur, the Court let
stand EPA's revocation of the 1-hour standard and those anti-
backsliding provisions of the Phase 1 Rule that had not been
successfully challenged. The June 8 decision reaffirmed the December
22, 2006 decision that EPA had improperly failed to retain measures
required for 1-hour nonattainment areas under the anti-backsliding
provisions of the regulations: (1) Nonattainment area New Source Review
(NSR) requirements based on an area's 1-hour nonattainment
classification; (2) Section 185 penalty fees for 1-hour severe or
extreme nonattainment areas; and (3) measures to be implemented
pursuant to section 172(c)(9) or 182(c)(9) of the Act, on the
contingency of an area not making reasonable further progress toward
attainment of the 1-hour NAAQS, or for failure to attain that NAAQS.
    In addition the June 8 decision clarified that the Court's
reference to conformity requirements for anti-backsliding purposes was
limited to requiring the continued use of 1-hour MVEBs until 8-hour
budgets were available for 8-hour conformity determinations, which is
already required under EPA's conformity regulations. The Court thus
clarified that 1-hour conformity determinations are not required for
anti-backsliding purposes.
    For the reasons set forth in the proposal, EPA does not believe
that the Court's rulings alter any requirements relevant to this
redesignation action so as to preclude redesignation, and do not
prevent EPA from finalizing this redesignation. EPA believes that the
Court's December 22, 2006 and June 8, 2007 decisions impose no
impediment to moving forward with redesignation of this area to
attainment, because even in light of the Court's decisions,
redesignation is appropriate under the relevant redesignation
provisions of the Act and longstanding policies regarding redesignation
requests.
    In its proposal, EPA proposed to find that the area had satisfied
the requirements under the 1-hour standard whether the 1-hour standard
was deemed to be reinstated or whether the Court's decision on the
petition for rehearing were modified to require something less than
compliance with all applicable 1-hour requirements. Because EPA
proposed to find that the area satisfied the requirements under either
scenario, EPA is proceeding to finalize the redesignation and to
conclude that the area met the requirements under the 1-hour standard
applicable for purposes of redesignation under the 8-hour standard.
These include the provisions of EPA's anti-backsliding rules, as well
as the additional anti-backsliding provisions identified by the Court
in its rulings. In its June 8, 2007 decision the Court limited its
vacatur so as to uphold those provisions of the anti-backsliding
requirements that were not successfully challenged. Therefore, EPA
finds that the area has met the anti-backsliding requirements, see 40
CFR 51.900 et seq; 70 FR 30592, 30604 (May 26, 2005) which apply by
virtue of the area's classification for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS, as well
as the four additional anti-backsliding provisions identified by the
Court, or that such requirements are not applicable for purposes of
redesignation. In addition, with respect to the requirement for
transportation conformity under the 1-hour standard, the Court in its
June 8 decision clarified that for those areas with 1-hour MVEBs, anti-
backsliding requires only that those 1-hour budgets must be used for 8-
hour conformity determinations until replaced by 8-hour budgets. To
meet this requirement, conformity determinations in such areas must
continue to comply with the applicable requirements of EPA's conformity
regulations at 40 CFR Part 93. The court clarified that 1-hour
conformity determinations are not required for anti-backsliding
purposes.

II. Final Action

    EPA is approving the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's redesignation
request, maintenance plan, and the 2002 base year emissions inventory
because the requirements for approval have been satisfied. EPA has
evaluated Pennsylvania's redesignation request that was submitted on
February 8, 2007 and determined that it meets the redesignation
criteria set forth in section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA. EPA believes
that the redesignation request and monitoring data demonstrate that the
Altoona Area has attained the 8-hour ozone standard. The final approval
of this redesignation request will change the designation of the
Altoona Area from nonattainment to attainment for the 8-hour ozone
standard. EPA is approving the maintenance plan for the Altoona Area
submitted on February 8, 2007 as a revision to the Pennsylvania SIP.
EPA is also approving the MVEBs submitted by PADEP in conjunction with
its redesignation request. In addition, EPA is approving the 2002 base
year emissions inventory submitted by PADEP on February 8, 2007 as a
revision to the Pennsylvania SIP. In this final rulemaking, EPA is
notifying the public that we have found that the MVEBs for volatile
organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOX) in the
Altoona Area for the 8-hour ozone maintenance plan are adequate and
approved for conformity purposes. As a result of our finding, the
Altoona Area must use the MVEBs from the submitted 8-hour ozone
maintenance plan for future conformity determinations. The adequate and
approved MVEBs are provided in the following table:

Adequate and Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Tons per Summer
                               Day (tpsd)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Budget year                        VOC        NOX
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2009..............................................        4.2        6.5
2018..............................................        2.8        3.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Altoona Area is subject to the CAA's requirement for the basic
nonattainment areas until and unless it is redesignated to attainment.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For

this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Redesignation of an area to attainment under section 107(d)(3)(e) of
the Clean Air Act does not impose any new requirements on small
entities. Redesignation is an action that affects the status of a
geographical area and does not impose any new regulatory requirements
on sources.
    Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law
and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that
required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule also
does not have tribal implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Because this action affects the status of
a geographical area, does not impose any new requirements on sources,
or allows the state to avoid adopting or implementing other
requirements, this action also does not have Federalism implications
because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule implementing
a Federal requirement, and does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air
Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Redesignation is an
action that affects the status of a geographical area and does not
impose any new requirements on sources. Thus, the requirements of
section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 1, 2007. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action.
    This action, approving the redesignation of the Altoona Area to
attainment for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the associated maintenance plan,
the 2002 base year emission inventory, and the MVEBs identified in the
maintenance plan, may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce
its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.

40 CFR Part 81

    Air pollution Control, National Parks, Wilderness Areas.

    Dated: July 16, 2007.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.

0
40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart NN--Pennsylvania

0
2. In (Sec.  52.2020, the table in paragraph (e)(1) is amended by
adding an entry for ``8-hour Ozone Maintenance Plan and the 2002 Base
Year Emissions Inventory'' to the end of the table to read as follows:

Sec.  52.2020  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (1) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Name of non-regulatory SIP        Applicable           State
            revision               geographic area   submittal date   EPA approval date  Additional  explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan    Blair County......        02/08/07  08/01/07 [Insert
 and 2002 Base Year Emissions                                         page number where
 Inventory.                                                           the document
                                                                      begins].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PART 81--[AMENDED]

0
3. The authority citation for Part 81 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
4. In Sec.  81.339, the table entitled ``Pennsylvania--Ozone (8-Hour
Standard)'' is amended by revising the entry for ``Altoona, PA: Blair
County'' to read as follows:

Sec.  81.339  Pennsylvania.

* * * * *

                                      Pennsylvania--Ozone (8-Hour Standard)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Designation\a\                      Category/Classification
        Designated area        ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Date\1\            Type                Date\1\                  Type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
Altoona, PA: Blair County.....        08/01/07                 Attainment.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Includes Indian County located in each county or area, except otherwise noted.
\1\ This date is June 15, 2004, unless otherwise noted.

* * * * *
 [FR Doc. E7-14560 Filed 7-31-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: November 24, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 227)]
[Notices]
[Page 71019-71020]
[DOCID:fr24no08-123]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2008-0333]

Delaware River and Bay Oil Spill Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of inaugural meeting and announcement of membership.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Delaware River and Bay Oil Spill Advisory Committee
(DRBOSAC) will hold its inaugural meeting in Philadelphia, PA to
discuss various issues to improve oil spill prevention and response
strategies for the Delaware River and Bay. During the inaugural
meeting, the items concerning the Committee's organization and
administration will be discussed. This meeting will be open to the
public.

DATES: The Committee will meet on Wednesday, December 17, 2008, from 9
a.m. to 4 p.m. This meeting may close early if all business is
finished. Written material should reach the Coast Guard on or before
December 11, 2008.

ADDRESSES: The Committee will meet at Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay,
1 Washington Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19147. Send written material to
Gerald Conrad, liaison to the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) of the
DRBOSAC, at the address above. This notice and any documents identified
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section as being available in the
docket may be viewed online, at http://www.regulations.gov, using
docket number USCG-2008-0333.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerald Conrad, liaison to the DFO of
the DRBOSAC, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is given under the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (Pub. L. 92-463).

Agenda of the Meeting

    The agenda for the inaugural meeting will be as follows:
    (1) Opening comments.
    (2) Introduction and swearing in of the new members.
    (3) Election of the Chair and Vice-Chair.
    (4) Indoctrination into Federal Advisory Committee Procedures.
    (5) Membership Administration issues.
    (6) Establishment and purpose of sub-committees (if applicable).
    (7) Indoctrination into technical terminology, and basic oil spill
response and removal procedures.
    (8) Future Committee business.
    (9) Closing.

Procedural

    This meeting will be open to the public. All persons entering the
building will have to present identification and may be subject to
screening. Please note that the meeting may close early if all business
is finished.
    The public will not be able to make oral presentations during the
meeting. The public may file written statements with the committee;
written material should reach the Coast Guard no later than December
11, 2008. If you would like a copy of your material distributed to each
member of the committee in advance of the meeting, please submit 35
copies to the liaison to the DFO no later than December 11, 2008.

Information on Services for Individuals With Disabilities

    For information on facilities, or services for individuals with
disabilities, or to request special assistance at the meeting, contact
the Liaison to the DFO as soon as possible.

    Dated: November 7, 2008.
David L. Scott,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Sector Delaware Bay Designated
Federal Officer.
 [FR Doc. E8-27847 Filed 11-21-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 51 (Friday, March 17, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 14122]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05328]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0078; Special Conditions No. 25-543-SC]

Special Conditions: Embraer S.A. Model ERJ-170 Airplanes; Seats
With Large, Non-Traditional, Non-Metallic Panels

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects an error that appeared in Federal
Docket no. FAA-2014-0078, Special Conditions no. 25-543-SC, which was
published in the Federal Register on March 3, 2014 (79 FR 11679). The
error is in the type-certificate number referenced in the Background
and Type Certification Basis sections of the special conditions. It is
being corrected herein.

DATES: The effective date of this correction is March 17, 2017

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jayson Claar, FAA, Airframe and Cabin
Safety Branch, ANM-111, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Special Conditions no. 25-543-SC was published in the Federal
Register on March 3, 2014 (79 FR 11679). The document issued special
conditions pertaining to seats with large, non-traditional, non-
metallic panels.
    As published, the document contained four errors, each referring to
the type-certificate number for the Embraer S.A. Model ERJ-170
airplane.
    Because no other part of the regulatory information has been
changed, the special conditions document is not being re-published.

Correction

    In the Final Special Conditions, Request for Comments document [FR
Doc. 2014-04559 Filed 2-28-14; 8:45 a.m.] published on March 3, 2014
(79 FR 11679), make the following correction:
    On page 11679, column 3, in the first and second paragraphs of the
Background section; and on page 11680, column 1, in the first paragraph
of the Type Certification Basis section, change ``A57NM'' to ``A56NM.''

    Issued in Renton, Washington on February 10, 2017.
Michael Kaszycki,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-05328 Filed 3-16-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 30, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 209)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 61300-61301]
[DOCID:fr30oc07-10]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2007-27430; Airspace Docket No. 07-ANM-4]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Springfield, CO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action will establish Class E surface airspace at
Springfield, CO. Controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate
aircraft using a new Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning System
(GPS) Standard Instrument Approach Procedure (SIAP) at Springfield
Municipal Airport. This action will enhance the safety of Instrument
Flight rules (IFR) aircraft operations at Springfield Municipal
Airport, Springfield, CO. Additionally this action also corrects the
geographic location of Springfield Municipal Airport, CO.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, February 14, 2008. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Western Service Area Office, System Support Group, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On August 9, 2007, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to establish Class E airspace at
Springfield, CO, (72 FR 44815). This action would improve the safety of
IFR aircraft at Springfield Municipal Airport, Springfield, CO.
Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.9R dated August 15, 2007, and effective September 15,
2007, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The Class
E airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in that Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by establishing Class E airspace at Springfield, CO. Controlled
airspace is necessary to accommodate IFR aircraft at Springfield
Municipal Airport, Springfield, CO.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes Class E airspace at Springfield, CO.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9R, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 15, 2007, and effective September 15,
2007 is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as a Surface Area.

* * * * *

ANM CO, E5 Springfield, CO [New]

Springfield Municipal Airport, CO
    (Lat. 37[deg]27'31'' N., long. 103[deg]37'05'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7.0-mile radius of Springfield Municipal Airport; that
airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface
beginning at TOBE VORTAC, thence north along V-169 to lat.
38[deg]34'00'' N., thence to lat. 38[deg]34'00'' N., long.
102[deg]00'00'' W., thence to lat. 36[deg]30'00'' N., long.
102[deg]00'00'' W., thence west on lat. 36[deg]30'00'' N. to V-81,
thence northwest along V-81 to point of beginning.
* * * * *

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on October 17, 2007.
Clark Desing,
Manager, System Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. E7-21133 Filed 10-29-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


                                                                      6560-50-P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 [EPA-HQ-SFUND-2005-0007, FRL -9994-81-OMS]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices (Renewal)

AGENCY:	Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION:	Notice.
SUMMARY:	The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted an information collection request (ICR), Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices (Renewal) (EPA ICR Number 1381.12, OMB Control Number 2050-0122) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through August 31, 2019. Public comments were previously requested via the Federal Register on March 14, 2019 during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden and cost to the public. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before [insert date 30 days after publication in the Federal Register].
ADDRESSES:  Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-RCRA-2050-0122, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by email to rcra-docketepa.gov, or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for EPA.
	EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Craig Dufficy, Materials Recovery and Waste Management Division, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, Mail Code 5304P, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Supporting documents, which explain in detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The telephone number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>.  For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
Abstract: In order to effectively implement and enforce final changes to 40 CFR Part 258

on a State level, owners/operators of municipal solid waste landfills have to comply with the

final reporting and recordkeeping requirements.  Respondents include owners or operators of

new municipal solid waste landfills (MSWLFs), existing MSWLFs, and lateral expansions of

existing MSWLFs.  The respondents, in complying with 40 CFR Part 258, are required to record

information in the facility operating record, pursuant to § 258.29, as it becomes available.  The

operating record must be supplied to the state as requested until the end of the post-closure care

period of the MSWLF.  The information collected will be used by the State Director to confirm

owner or operator compliance with the regulations under Part 258. These owners or operators

could include federal, state, and local governments, and private waste management companies.

Facilities in NAICS codes 9221, 5622, 3252, 3251 and 3253 may be affected by this rule.
Form Numbers: None.
Respondents/affected entities:  Recordkeeping and Reporting  -  Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices.
Respondent's obligation to respond: The respondents, in complying with 40 CFR Part 258, are

required to record information in the facility operating record, pursuant to § 258.29, as it

becomes available.

Estimated number of respondents:  10,211.
Frequency of response: On occasion.
Total estimated burden: 197,965 hours (per year).  Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b)
Total estimated cost:  $15,238,668 (per year), includes $2,210,853 annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease in the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens.  This is due to the revised method of burden calculation, not any program changes or modifications to the underlying burden level assumptions. Previously, the burdens were grouped together and given a weighted average. On this ICR, each category of burdens was seperated and evaluated as to the specific task. The task specific burden calculations are a reflection of actual hours spent on each task.
Dated: _____________________________________
___________________________________________
Courtney Kerwin, Director, Regulatory Support Division