[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 179 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56894-56895]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22637]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-67812; File No. SR-NYSE-2012-29]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Rule 76 To Add
Supplementary Material Relating to a Cross Function That Provides a
Regulation NMS Rule 611--Compliant Tool for Floor Brokers

September 10, 2012.

I. Introduction

    On July 13, 2012, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``Exchange'' or
``NYSE '') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change amending NYSE Rule 76 to add supplementary
material to provide Floor Brokers with a new functionality through
which to effect manual cross transactions of block size. The proposed
rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on July
27, 2012.\3\ The Commission received no comment letters regarding the
proposed rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67488 (July 23,
2012), 77 FR 44302 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    Currently, the Floor Broker and Designated Market Maker (``DMM''),
after announcing a proposed cross transaction to the trading crowd,\4\
must manually monitor the protected best bid or offer to ensure that
the proposed cross can be executed in accordance with the customer's
instructions and in compliance with Rule 611 of Regulation NMS (``Rule
611'').\5\ The Exchange contends that, in today's fast-moving
electronic markets, this manual monitoring process may not be the
optimal manner by which to facilitate and evidence compliance with Rule
611.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ According to the Exchange, a DMM, on behalf of a Floor
Broker, will enter a cross transaction into the Exchange's Display
Book system as a completed transaction in situations where no one in
the trading crowd otherwise breaks up a proposed cross. The
completed transaction is printed to the consolidated tape (``Tape'')
at that price.
    \5\ 17 CFR 242.611. Commission staff has issued guidance
pertaining to the manual execution of orders under staff FAQ 3.23 of
Rule 611 (``FAQ 3.23'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to add a new Supplementary
Material to NYSE Rule 76.\6\ The proposed Supplementary Material would
allow Floor Brokers to enter a cross transaction into their hand held
device (``HHD''); the Exchange would provide a quote minder function
that would monitor protected bids and offers to determine when the
limit price assigned to the proposed crossed transaction is such that
the orders may be executed consistent with Regulation NMS Rule 611.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ NYSE Rule 76 governs the execution of ``cross'' or
``crossing'' orders by Floor Brokers. NYSE Rule 76 applies only to
manual transactions executed at the point of sale on the trading
floor and provides that when a member has an order to buy and an
order to sell the same security that can be crossed at the same
price, the member is required to announce to the trading crowd the
proposed cross by offering the security at a price that is higher
than his or her bid by a minimum variation permitted in the security
before crossing the orders. Any other member, including the
Designated Market Maker (``DMM''), can break up the announced bid
and offer by trading with either side of the proposed cross
transaction. According to the Exchange, an agency ``cross'' of
10,000 shares or more at or between the Exchange best bid or offer
has priority and can only be broken up to provide price improvement
that is better than the cross price as to all or part of such bid or
offer. A buy and sell order to be crossed pursuant to NYSE Rule
72(d) is subject to Rule 76, including the requirement that such a
proposed cross be announced to the crowd. See Notice, supra note 3
at 44302; see also, NYSE Rule 72(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    When the trade can be effected at or between the protected bid and
offer, the Exchange-provided quote minder will: (i) Deliver an alert
message to the Floor Broker's HHD indicating that the orders may be
crossed; (ii) capture a time-stamped quote within Exchange systems that
includes the time that the alert was sent to the HHD and the protected
bid and offer at that time; (iii) commence a 20-second timer from the
moment a cross trade may be executed at or between the protected and
bid offer; and (iv) enable a print key function in the HHD permitting
the Floor Broker to cross the orders and print the trade through
Exchange systems to the Tape within that 20-second time period.
    When the Floor Broker receives the alert message mentioned above,
the Floor Broker must first announce the proposed cross transaction to
the trading crowd; if the crowd or the DMM does not break up the
proposed cross trade, the Floor Broker may then execute the trade using
the print key function of the HHD before the expiration of the 20-
second time period.
    The proposed Supplementary Material would require the proposed
cross transaction to consist of at least 10,000 shares or a quantity of
stock having a market value of $200,000 or more. Further, the proposed
cross transaction may not be for the account of the member or member
organization, an account of an associated person, or an account with
respect to which the member, member organization or associated person
exercises investment discretion. The Exchange has represented that this
restriction would help ensure that the functionality would not be used
for affiliated principal order flow.

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.\7\
Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ in that it is designed
to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in
regulating,

clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that the proposed Supplementary Material to
NYSE Rule 76 removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a
free and open market because the proposed cross functionality is
reasonably designed to assist Floor Brokers' ability to cross orders on
the Exchange, particularly if there is significant quote traffic with
flickering prices, while facilitating compliance with the trade-through
restrictions of Rule 611. Given the rapid quotation changes in today's
electronic markets, the Commission believes that it is reasonable to
allow Floor Brokers a 20-second look-back period in which to manually
execute the cross transaction without violating the trade-through rule.
The Commission also notes that the proposal does not otherwise change
the operation of Rule 76. For example, the Floor Broker is still
required to expose the proposed cross transaction to the trading crowd,
and the proposed cross transaction may be broken up by members by
trading with either side of the proposed transaction during the 20-
second time period.
    The Commission further notes that the proposal would bring more
automation to the Exchange, which could support more efficient
executions of the cross transactions. Moreover, because the transaction
terms will be captured in an automated system, the proposed cross
functionality is reasonably designed to provide a better audit trail
for manually crossed orders, which may facilitate review of Floor
Broker transactions for purposes of compliance with Rule 611.

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\9\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2012-29) be, and it
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-22637 Filed 9-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 132 (Thursday, July 9, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41188-41189]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13988]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2020-0354]

Regulated Navigation Area; Lake Washington, Seattle, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notification of non-enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will not enforce the Regulated Navigation Area
in Lake Washington, Seattle, WA as part of Seattle Seafair events which
typically occur annually in July and August. The Captain of the Port
has determined that since Seafair has been cancelled in 2020,
enforcement of this regulation is not necessary.

DATES: The Coast Guard does not plan to enforce regulations in 33 CFR
165.1341 in July and August 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notification of non-enforcement, call or email CWO2 William E.
Martinez, Sector Puget Sound Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard normally enforces a
Regulated Navigation Area in 33 CFR 165.1341 in Lake Washington,
Seattle, WA annually immediately before and after the Seafair events,
which usually occur during the last week in July and first two weeks of
August. This year, the event organizers have cancelled Seafair.
Therefore, the Coast Guard does not plan to enforce 33 CFR 165.1341, in
July and August 2020.

    In addition to this notification of non-enforcement in the Federal
Register, if the situation changes and the Captain of the Port
determines that the regulated area needs to be enforced, the Captain of
the Port will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners and provide actual
notice of enforcement to any persons in the regulated area.

    Dated: June 23, 2020.
L.A. Sturgis,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2020-13988 Filed 7-8-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION SAN 4845 Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request EPA / Office of Air and Radiation, OTAQ 2.

OMB control number b. G None a. 2060 0287 3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. G New collection b.

Revision of a currently approved collection c. G Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a.

Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes

No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. Three years from approval date b. X Other Specify: 9/ 30/ 04 7. Title Compression, Ignition, Non Road Engines Certification Application ( Proposed Rule for In Use Testing of On Road Heavy Duty Diesel Engines and Vehicles)

8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) 1684.07 9. Keywords Environmental protection; diesel testing, in use testing 10. Abstract The information collection contained in this ICR is necessary to ensure compliance with the associated emission standards. Heavy duty diesel engine manufacturers will need to comply with information collection requirements.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. P Business or other for profit e. Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ G Voluntary b. __ G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. P G Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 84 b. Total annual responses 803 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 95 % c. Total hours requested 92,763 d. Current OMB inventory 89,047 e. Difference 3,716 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 3,716 2. Adjustment 0 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars)

a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs $ 683 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) $ 4,091 c. Total annualized cost requested $ 4,774 d. Current OMB inventory $ 4,089 e. Difference $ 685 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change $ 685 2. Adjustment 0 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. _ P_ Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a.

Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c.

Reporting 1. Q On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4.

Quarterly 5. Q Semi annually 6. Q Annually 7. Q Biannually 8. Q Other ( describe) 17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes

No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Richard Wilcox Phone: 734 214 4390 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( I) Why the information is being collected' ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( I) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official Chet France, Director, Assessment and Standards Division Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Oscar Morales, Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Information Collection Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76602-76603]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30935]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; Actions on Special Permit
Applications

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: Notice of actions on special permit applications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations (49 CFR part 107,
subpart B), notice is hereby given of the actions on special permits
applications in (November to November 2012). The mode of transportation
involved are identified by a number in the ``Nature of Application''
portion of the table below as follows: 1--Motor vehicle, 2--Rail
freight, 3--Cargo vessel, 4--Cargo aircraft only, 5--Passenger-carrying
aircraft. Application numbers prefixed by the letters EE represent
applications for Emergency Special Permits. It should be noted that
some of the sections cited were those in effect at the time certain
special permits were issued.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 17, 2012.
Donald Burger,
Chief, Special Permits and Approvals Branch.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Nature of special
    S.P. No.         Applicant      Regulation(s)      permit thereof
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Modification Special Permit Granted
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15540-M.........  Andrew Airways,  49 CFR           To modify the
                   Inc., Kodiak,    175.310(c).      special permit
                   AK.                               originally issued
                                                     on an emergency
                                                     basis and make it
                                                     permanent.
11989-M.........  Department of    49 CFR 172.504;  To modify the
                   Defense, Scott   176.83(a),       special permit to
                   AFB, IL.         (b),             authorize an
                                    (c)(2)(iii),     additional Division
                                    (d) and (f).     2.2 hazardous
                                                     materials, modify
                                                     the list of
                                                     permited guided
                                                     bombs, packages,
                                                     and operational
                                                     controls.
14656-M.........  PurePak          49 CFR           To modify the
                   Technology       173.158(f)(3).   special permit to
                   Corporation,                      authorize a 2.6
                   Chandler, AZ.                     liter capacity
                                                     square plastic
                                                     bottle and to allow
                                                     use of a 500 ml
                                                     round plastic
                                                     bottle.
14188-M.........  IDQ Operating    49 CFR           To modify the
                   Inc.,            173.304(d),      special permit to
                   Tarrytown, NY.   173.306(a)(3)    reflect current
                                    and 178.33a.     statutes and
                                                     regulations
                                                     pertaining to
                                                     consumer
                                                     commodities.
12396-M.........  National         49 CFR 180.209   To modify the
                   Aeronautics      and 173.302.     special permit to
                   and Space                         authorize rail
                   Administration                    freight, cargo
                   , Washington,                     vessel, and
                   DC.                               passenger aircraft
                                                     as additional modes
                                                     of operation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       New Special Permit Granted
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15558-N.........  3M Company, St.  49 CFR 173.212,  To authorize the
                   Paul, MN.        172.302(a) (c).  manufacture,
                                                     marking, sale, and
                                                     use of service
                                                     motor vehicles for
                                                     use in transporting
                                                     a corrosive solid
                                                     material in
                                                     alternative
                                                     packaging. (modes
                                                     1, 3)
15626-N.........  EC Source        49 CFR 49 CFR    To authorize the
                   Aviation, LLC,   Parts 172.101,   transportation in
                   Mesa, AZ.        Column (9b),     commerce of certain
                                    172.204(c)(3),   hazardous materials
                                    173.27(b)(2),    by cargo aircraft
                                    175.30(a)(1),    including by
                                    172.200,         external load in
                                    172.300, and     remote areas
                                    172.400.         without being
                                                     subject to hazard
                                                     communication
                                                     requirements and
                                                     quantity
                                                     limitations where
                                                     no other means of
                                                     transportation is
                                                     available. (modes
                                                     3, 4)
15628-N.........  E.I. du Pont de  49 CFR 179.100-  To authorize the
                   Nemours and      12(c).           transportation in
                   Company,                          commerce of
                   Wilmington, DE.                   hazardous material
                                                     in tank cars with a
                                                     manway housing
                                                     which allows for
                                                     opening from either
                                                     of two sides. (mode
                                                     2)
15658-N.........  Xcel Energy,     49 CFR           To authorize the
                   Monticello, MN.  173.427(b)(1),   transportation in
                                    173.465(c),      commerce of certain
                                    173.465(d).      Radioactive
                                                     material in
                                                     alternative
                                                     packaging by
                                                     highway. A copy of
                                                     the environmental
                                                     assessment can be
                                                     located at http://www.regulations.gov
                                                     #!documentDetail;D=
                                                     PHMSA-2012-0165-
                                                     0002. (mode 1)
15683-N.........  CESSCO, Johns    49 CFR           To authorize the
                   Island, SC.      180.209(g).      transportation in
                                                     commerce of certain
                                                     4BW240 cylinders
                                                     that have been
                                                     tested using an
                                                     alternative testing
                                                     procedure. (mode 1)
15698-N.........  Timberline       49 CFR 172.101   To authorize the
                   Helicopters,     Column (9B);     transportation in
                   Inc.,            172.204(c)(3);   commerce of certain
                   Sandpoint, ID.   173.27(b)(2);    hazardous materials
                                    175.30(a)(1);    by Part 133
                                    172.200;         Rotorcraft External
                                    172.301(c);      Load Operations,
                                    175.75.          attached to or
                                                     suspended from an
                                                     aircraft, in remote
                                                     areas of the U.S.
                                                     without meeting
                                                     certain hazard
                                                     communication and
                                                     stowage
                                                     requirements. (mode
                                                     4)
15712-N.........  Air Transport    49 CFR 172.101   To authorize the air
                   International,   Column (9B);     transportation in
                   Little Rock,     172.204(c)(3);   commerce of certain
                   AR.              173.27(b)(2)(3   explosives which
                                    );               are forbidden for
                                    175.30(a)(1).    shipment by cargo-
                                                     only aircraft.
                                                     (mode 4)
15721-N.........  Hunter Well      49 CFR           To authorize the
                   Science,         173.301(1);      transportation in
                   Arlington, TX.   173.304a;        commerce of a
                                    173.304a(a);     Division 2.2 gas in
                                    173.304a(a)(2).  a non-DOT
                                                     specification
                                                     cylinder. (modes 1,
                                                     3, 4, 5)
15722-N.........  Raytheon         49 CFR 172.101   To authorize the air
                   Missile          Column (9B);     transportation in
                   Systems,         172.204(c)(3);   commerce of certain
                   Tucson, AZ.      173.27(b)(2)(3   explosives which
                                    ); 175.30(a)     are forbidden for
                                    (1).             shipment by cargo-
                                                     only aircraft.
                                                     (mode 4)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    Emergency Special Permit Granted
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15748-N.........  Wal-Mart         49 CFR part      To authorize the one-
                   Stores, Inc.,    172, part 173    time, one-way
                   Bentonville,     and part 177.    transportation in
                   AR.                               commerce of certain
                                                     hazardous materials
                                                     from damaged or
                                                     stucturally-
                                                     impaired retail
                                                     stores impacted by
                                                     Hurricane Sandy to
                                                     a temporary
                                                     warehousing
                                                     facility for
                                                     approximately 10
                                                     miles by motor
                                                     vehicle. (mode 1)
15751-N.........  Williams Gas     49 CFR           To authorize the use
                   Pipeline,        177.834(h),      of non-DOT
                   White Have, PA.  178.700(c)(1).   specification metal
                                                     refueling tanks
                                                     containing Class 3
                                                     liquids and the on
                                                     and off loading
                                                     while the container
                                                     remains on the
                                                     truck. (mode 1)
15752-N.........  Hurricane Sandy  49 CFR 173.242   To authorize the
                   Response.        and Part 172     transportation in
                                    Subpart C,       commerce of certain
                                    Subpart D,       hazardous materials
                                    Subpart F and    in support of the
                                    Subpart I.       recovery and relief
                                                     in response to
                                                     Hurricane Sandy.
                                                     (mode 1)
15756-N.........  United States    49 CFR Parts     To authorize the
                   Environmental    171-180.         transportation in
                   Protection                        commerce of certain
                   Agency Region                     hazardous materials
                   II, Edison, NJ.                   in support of the
                                                     recovery and relief
                                                     efforts within the
                                                     Hurricane Sandy
                                                     disaster areas of
                                                     New York and New
                                                     Jersey under
                                                     conditions that may
                                                     not meet the
                                                     Hazardous Materials
                                                     Regulations. (mode
                                                     1)
15761-N.........  MSD Consumer     49 CFR 171.2(g)  To authorize the
                   Care, Inc.,                       transportation in
                   Whitehouse                        commerce of
                   Station, NJ.                      approximately
                                                     101,000 DOT
                                                     Specification 2P
                                                     inner metal
                                                     receptacles
                                                     containing an
                                                     aerosol sunscreen
                                                     that were
                                                     incorrectly marked
                                                     ``DOT-SP 14429.''
                                                     (mode 1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Modification Special Permit Withdrawn
------------------------------------------------------------------------
14509-M.........  Pacific          49 CFR           To modify the
                   Consolidated     173.302(a)(1),   special permit to
                   Industries,      173.304a(a)(1)   authorize the
                   LLC,             , 175.3.         transportation in
                   Riverside, CA.                    commerce of
                                                     cylinders
                                                     containing
                                                     oxidizing gases
                                                     without a rigid
                                                     outer packaging
                                                     capable of passing
                                                     the Flame
                                                     Penetration and
                                                     Resistance Test and
                                                     the Thermal
                                                     Resistance Test.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      New Special Permit Withdrawn
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15699-N.........  Flight Express   49 CFR           To authorize the
                   Incorporated,    172.203(a);      transportation in
                   Orlando, FL.     175.700(b)(2)(   commerce of
                                    ii);             radioactive
                                    175.702(b).      material on cargo
                                                     only aircraft when
                                                     the combined
                                                     transport index
                                                     exceeds 50.0 and/or
                                                     the separation
                                                     criteria cannot be
                                                     met. (mode 4)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 Denied
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15664-M.........  Request by Pollux Aviation Ltd., Wasilla, AK, November
                                         09, 2012.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2012-30935 Filed 12-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4909-60-M


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2985-2986]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00838]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-74053; File No. SR-ICC-2015-001]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Revise ICC End-of-Day Price Discovery
Policies and Procedures

January 14, 2015.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder \2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 5, 2015, ICE Clear Credit LLC (``ICC'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have
been prepared primarily by ICC. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The principal purpose of the proposed rule change is to revise the
ICC End-of-Day Price Discovery Policies and Procedures to incorporate
enhancements to its price discovery process. This revision does not
require any changes to the ICC Rules.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, ICC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. ICC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of these statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    ICC proposes revising the ICC End-of-Day Price Discovery Policies
and Procedures to incorporate enhancements to its price discovery
process.
    ICC believes such revisions will facilitate the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities transactions and derivative
agreements, contracts, and transactions for which it is responsible.
The proposed revisions are described in detail as follows.
    ICC currently utilizes a ``cross and lock'' algorithm as part of
its price discovery process. Under this algorithm, standardized bids
and offers derived from Clearing Participant (``CP'') submissions are
matched by sorting them from highest to lowest and lowest to highest
levels, respectively. This sorting process pairs the CP submitting the
highest bid price with the CP submitting the lowest offer price, the CP
submitting the second highest bid price with the CP submitting the
second-lowest offer price, and so on. The algorithm then identifies
crossed and/or locked markets. Crossed markets are the CP pairs
generated by the sorting and ranking process for which the bid price of
one CP is above the offer price of the matched CP. The algorithm
identifies locked markets, where the bid and the offer are equal, in a
similar fashion.
    Whenever there are crossed and/or locked matched markets, the
algorithm applies a set of rules designed to identify standardized
submissions that are ``obvious errors.'' The algorithm sets a high bid
threshold equal to the preliminary end-of-day (``EOD'') level plus one
EOD bid offer width (``BOW''), and a low offer threshold equal to the
preliminary EOD level minus one EOD BOW. The algorithm considers a CP's
standardized submission to be an ``obvious error'' if the bid is higher
than the high bid threshold, or the offer is lower than the low offer
threshold.
    CP pairs identified by the algorithm as crossed or locked markets
are required from time to time, under the End-of-Day Price Discovery
Policies and Procedures, to enter into cleared trades with each other
as part of the ICC EOD price discovery process (``Firm Trade'').
Currently, ICC excludes standardized submissions it identifies as
obvious errors from Firm Trades and does not use these submissions in
its determination of published EOD levels.
    ICC proposes implementing consequences for CPs providing price
discovery submissions deemed to be

obvious errors. Effectively, ICC is extending the process for
determining Firm Trades to include all standardized submissions,
including those classified as obvious errors. ICC will effectively
execute its current EOD algorithm twice, initially in the same way it
does today, by eliminating obvious errors, to generate the final EOD
levels, and again, without excluding obvious errors, to generate Firm
Trades and reversing transactions.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ A reversing transaction is a second Firm Trade with
identical attributes to the initial Firm Trade, but with the buyer
and seller counterparties reversed, and at that day's EOD price
rather than the original Firm Trade price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To limit the potential exposure created through Firm Trades that
include a bid or offer from an obvious error submission, ICC will
adjust trade prices, where appropriate, to fall within a predefined
band on either side of the EOD price such that the potential profit or
loss (``P/L'') realized by unwinding the trade at the EOD level is
capped.
    To prevent CPs from receiving Firm Trades with large P/L impact in
Index instruments that are less actively traded, and therefore more
difficult and/or more expensive to manage the associated risk, ICC will
have the ability to automatically generate reversing transactions at
the EOD level for specific Index instruments (i.e., for specific index
risk sub-factors as defined by specific combinations of index/sub-index
and series) based on liquidity.\4\ Currently, reversing transactions
are only available for Single Name instruments. There are no changes to
ICC's Clearing Rules as a result of these changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The ICC Risk Department, in conjunction with the ICC Trading
Advisory Committee, specifies the index risk sub-factors that are
eligible for automatic reversing transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \5\ requires, among other things,
that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to promote the prompt
and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions, and
to the extent applicable, derivative agreements, contracts and
transactions and to comply with the provisions of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder. ICC believes that the proposed rule change
is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to ICC, in particular, to section
17A(b)(3)(F),\6\ because ICC believes that the proposed rule change
will assure the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions, derivatives agreements, contracts, and
transactions, as the proposed revisions enhance ICC's price discovery
process, by ensuring traders are accountable for all price discovery
submissions to ICC, not just those submissions nearer to ICC's final
EOD level. As such, the proposed change is designed to promote the
prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities
transactions, derivatives agreements, contracts, and transactions
within the meaning of section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \6\ Id.
    \7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    ICC does not believe the proposed rule change would have any
impact, or impose any burden, on competition. The enhancements to ICC's
price discovery process apply uniformly across all market participants.
Therefore, ICC does not believe the proposed rule change imposes any
burden on competition that is inappropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not been
solicited or received. ICC will notify the Commission of any written
comments received by ICC.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) As to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-ICC-2015-001 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICC-2015-001. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filings will also be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of ICE Clear Credit
and on ICE Clear Credit's Web site at https://www.theice.com/clear-credit/regulation.
    All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICC-2015-001
and should be submitted on or before February 11, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-00838 Filed 1-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


ICR SUPPORTING STATEMENT OUTLINE
Part A

1. Identification of the Information Collection

1(a) Title of the Information Collection

CEQ-EPA Presidential Innovation Award for Environmental Educators Application (New)
EPA ICR Number 2524.02, OMB Control Number 2090-0031

1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract

The purpose of this information collection request is to collect applications for the Presidential Innovation Award for Environmental Educators program. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency), in conjunction with the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), established the award program to meet the requirements of Section 8(e) of the National Environmental Education Act (20 U.S.C. § 5507(e)).

Agency officials developed the "Application for the Presidential Innovation Award for Environmental Educators" as a tool for selecting awardees.  Teachers can participate by visiting http://www2.epa.gov/education/piaee-application and completing and submitting the application form. Application forms can be filled electronically and submitted by email or printed and mailed. Information collected includes background about the teacher and his/her experience, completed essay responses, sample teaching materials, and recommendations from a student, principal, and fellow teacher. EPA anticipates that the number of respondents completing the form during the period of this ICR will average 33 per year.

Information gathered under the application form will be collected and stored in electronic format at Agency headquarters, on a secured drive. The information collected from this ICR will continuously help EPA and CEQ to select the top awardees for the Presidential Innovation Award for Environmental Educators (PIAEE). The selected winners will benefit from small cash prizes, which will help them to continue their mission of advancing innovative approaches to environmental education to grades K-12.

2. Need for and use of the Collection

2(a) Need/Authority for Collection

The National Environmental Education Act Section 8(e) (20 U.S.C. § 5507(e)) dictates that EPA and CEQ provide cash awards for elementary and secondary education teachers and local education agencies. Specifically:

 The Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality, on behalf of the President, is authorized to develop and administer an awards program to recognize elementary and secondary education teachers and their local educational agencies who demonstrate excellence in advancing environmental education through innovative approaches. One teacher, and the local education agency employing such teacher, from each State, including the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, are eligible to be selected for an award pursuant to this subsection.

 The Chairman is authorized to provide a cash award of up to $2,500 to each teacher selected to receive an award pursuant to this section, which shall be used to further the recipient's professional development in environmental education.

 The Chairman is also authorized to provide a cash award of up to $2,500 to the local education agency employing any teacher selected to receive an award pursuant to this section, which shall be used to fund environmental educational activities and programs. Such awards may not be used for construction costs, general expenses, salaries, bonuses, or other administrative expenses.

The application form is completed by candidates for consideration as awardees under the PIAEE. The application form is completed as part of the awardee selection process. The application form is reviewed by the program manager and a panel of EPA and CEQ officials to determine eligibility and fulfillment of selection criteria. Using the application form benefits EPA by allowing for the selection of qualified awardees.

2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data

Information gathered under the application form will continuously help EPA and CEQ select the top awardees for the Presidential Innovation Award for Environmental Educators. Using this form enables program managers and reviewers to select viable candidates for the awards.

3. Non-duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria

3(a) Non-duplication

Almost all information requested from respondents under this ICR is personal in nature, and in most cases, is not available from other sources.

3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR submission to OMB

Public notice on the renewal of this ICR was published in the Federal Register on August 11, 2015 under 80 FR 48101. This notice indicates that the ICR is up for renewal and that public comments on the previous burden estimates and any proposed changes are being sought by the EPA Office of Environmental Education (OEE). There were no comments received.

3(c) Consultations

In the preparation of this ICR, the EPA OEE provided past respondents the opportunity to comment on the burden associated with the standard. The respondents reported that on average it takes 10 hours to complete the application form, which was not found to be overly burdensome.

Daniel Delcher
Essex County School of Technology
2017 Presidential Innovation Award for Environmental Educators Winner
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

Laura Poidomani
Sax Middle School
2017 Presidential Innovation Award for Environmental Educators Winner
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection

The award program is conducted on an annual basis. The form is required to be completed once a year in order to select each year's awardees. The form allows government officials to select qualified awardees for the program, as required by the National Environmental Education Act (See Section 2 (a)). EPA would not be able to fulfill the requirements of the Act if the frequency of the collection period decreased.

3(e) General Guidelines

These reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated by OMB under 5 CFR Part 1320, Section 1320.5.

3(f) Confidentiality

The primary use of the information collected on this form is to allow EPA to review and select awardees in accordance with the National Environmental Education Act. Some information reported on the form is confidential, which includes name, address and phone number. This information is required to be withheld from the public pursuant to Section 107(a) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. Agency personnel shall not publicly release the information contained therein.

3(g) Sensitive Questions

None of the information collected by this action results in or requests sensitive information of any nature.

4. The Respondents and the Information Requested

4(a) Respondents/NAICS Codes

The respondents are K-12 teachers who teach on a full-time in a public school that is operated by a local education agency, including schools funded by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. For this program, a local education agency is one as defined by section 198 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (now codified at 20 U.S.C. 7801(26)). The NAICS code is 561311.

4(b) Information Requested

A copy of the application form is attached as Attachment A.

(i) Data items, including record keeping requirements
The Agency will maintain an Excel spreadsheet of the names of the respondents, their email address, and associated reviewer scores for selection purposes. This spreadsheet is internal only and not available to the public. Additionally, EPA will retain a hard copy of each completed application form and store according to Agency guidelines. Completed applications that are distributed to reviewers will have any confidential information redacted. The Agency does not anticipate any record keeping activities on the part of the respondents under this ICR.

(ii) Respondent Activities
Respondents will be asked to complete the application form. Forms may be downloaded from EPA's education website. Respondents can fill in the form electronically and may either print and mail a copy or they may attach the completed form by email. Each form will require the applicant to read the instructions, complete the application, write the essay responses and sample materials, and gather letters of recommendation. The form will take approximately 10 hours to complete.

5. The Information Collected - Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management

5(a) Agency Activities

To respond to this ICR, we estimate that the Program Manager will spend 3 hours per respondent screening applications and answering respondent questions. The Program Manager's labor cost is estimated to be a GS 13 Step 5. For Year 1, that is $52.66 per hour (rounded to $53 per hour), $54.21 for Year 2 (rounded to $54), and $55.76 (rounded to $56) for Year 3, according to the Office of Personnel Management's 2018 Salary table https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/2018/general-schedule/

Each application is required to be reviewed by a minimum of 3 reviewers. EPA estimates that each reviewer spends one and one half hour reviewing each application form, including completing a written evaluation of the application package and discussing winner selections. The reviewer labor cost is estimated to be a GS 13 Step 1. For Year 1 that is $46.46 per hour (rounded to $47 per hour), $48.01 per hour (rounded to $48) for Year 2 and $49.56 per hour (rounded to $50) for Year 3, according to the Office of Personnel Management's 2018 Salary Table
https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/2018/general-schedule/

The Program Manager and Review Panel total labor rates below include a factor of 1.6 (60%) for overhead costs.

Program Manager Estimated Cost
EPA estimates that approximately 75 respondents per year will apply for the Presidential Innovation Award for Environmental Educators over the next 3 years. Multiplying the number of respondents (75) by the 3-year average dollar amount paid to EPA's Program Manager, and multiplying the subtotal cost of by 1.6 (60% overhead) to allow for employee overhead costs, and then averaging over the three years, we estimate the subtotal to be $22,820

Year
Labor Cost
Hours
No. of Respondents
Overhead Cost
Total Cost
1
                                      $53
                                      3.5
                                      75
                                      1.6
$22,260
2
                                      $54
                                      3.5
                                      75
                                      1.6
$22,680
3
                                      $56
                                      3.5
                                      75
                                      1.6
$23,520
Average

$22,820

Reviewers Estimated Cost
Multiplying the number of respondents (75) by the average dollar amount paid to EPA's reviewers by the number of reviewers (3), and then multiplying the subtotal cost of by 1.6 (60% overhead) to allow for employee overhead costs, then averaging over three years, we estimate the subtotal to be $34,800.

Year
Labor Cost
Hours
No. of Reviewers
No. of Respondents
Overhead Cost
Total Cost
1
                                      $47
                                       2
                                       3
                                      75
                                      1.6
$33,840
2
                                      $48
                                       2
                                       3
                                      75
                                      1.6
$34,560
3
                                      $50
                                       2
                                       3
                                      75
                                      1.6
$36,000
Average

$34,800

Total Program Manager and Reviewer Cost Using 3 Year Average
The total 3 year average dollar burden estimate for this ICR (for both Program Manager and three reviewers) is approximately $19,207.

Agency (EPA) activities associated with the collection of information include:

Program Manager:
 Internal development, review and approval of Application Form (updated 2017)
 Taking actions to review the form, ascertain improvements, and revise periodically (approximately 2 year intervals or more if needed)
 Providing copies of the application form
 Answering any respondent questions, follow-up
 Gathering respondents' completed forms
 Screening respondents' completed forms
 Recordkeeping/storing the completed form
 Forwarding form to EPA's Reviewers

Reviewers:
 Review of respondents' completed forms
 Ranking awardee selections

5(b) Collection Methodology and Management

In collecting and analyzing the information associated with this ICR, EPA will use computers, e-mail, and websites. Respondents can obtain a blank application form from the EPA website. They may fill out the application form either electronically or in hard copy. The respondents can type essays in a Word document and attached them to the application form. Respondents can either print and mail in the application form and essay responses, or send them as an email attachment. While respondents may type their information on the form, they must complete the signature page. In this case, respondents are allowed to print the signature page, sign, and scan the page as an attachment.

EPA will ensure the accuracy and completeness of collected information by reviewing each submittal and screening for missing components. EPA will enter basic contact information from the completed application form (name, school, email address) into an Excel Database that will only be accessible by the Program Manager. Each application form and essay responses are reviewed by a minimum of two EPA reviewers. Each reviewer submits the score to the Program Manager and the Program Manager will enter the score in to the Excel Database. This information is aggregated to select the respondents with the highest average scores from each EPA region as awardee finalists. This information is not available to the public.

5(c) Small Entity Flexibility

The respondents are small entities (i.e. teachers). The impact of small entities was taken into consideration during the development of the PIAEE application. The amount of questions asked was the minimum amount of information needed in order to make a decision on the awards.

5(d) Collection Schedule
EPA anticipates having the following annual collection schedule.
 January -  Application period opens. Respondents can download the application form from the EPA website and submit the completed form and essay responses via hard copy or email.
 March 30   -  Application period closes.
 May 1  -  May 30  -  EPA screens and reviews applications.
 June 1  -  EPA aggregates reviewer scores and submits selected finalists to CEQ.
 June 1-30  -  CEQ reviews and screens finalists' applications.
 Second week of July  -  EPA announces award winners.

After the initial completion of the application form, respondents who are selected as finalists may be asked to provide additional information, including proof of the number of years teaching and may undergo screening by CEQ.

6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection

6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden
Elementary and secondary schools mean hourly wage: $26.67.
 https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes250000.htm

To respond to this ICR, we estimated that each respondent will take 10 hours to complete the application form. The estimated labor cost for elementary and secondary school employees is $27.00, which including the standard overhead factor of 1.6 produces a loaded wage rate of $43.20 (rounded to $43). We estimate that approximately 75 teachers will respond to this request each year. Multiplying the estimated number of respondents (75) by the estimated respondent labor cost ($43) by the number of hours (10), we estimate the total dollar burden estimate for this ICR to be $14,191 for year 1, $14,191 for year 2, and $14,191 for year 3. The grand total for all 3 years is estimated at $42,573. The annual average respondent cost over the three years is $14,191, as indicated in the following annual respondent burden and cost table.

6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs

 Estimating Labor Costs

Annual Cost for Teacher Award Respondents
Respondent Activities to Complete Form
Burden Hours Per Respondent
Burden for Respondent ($26.67 per labor hour multiplied by 1.6 for overhead equals $43)
Number of Respondents Per Year
Total Respondent Cost Per Year
Read instructions
                                      0.5
                                      $43
           75
                                     $1613
Fill out form
                                       1
                                      $43
                                      75
                                     $3225
Write essays
                                      4.5
                                      $43
                                      75
                                    $14,513
Gather recommendations
                                       1
                                      $43
                                      75
                                     $3225
Written sample materials
                                       2
                                      $43
                                      75
                                     $6450
Submit application package
                                       1
                                      $43
                                      75

                                     $3225
TOTAL
                                   10 hours
                                      $43
                                      75
                                    $32250

 (ii) Estimating Capital and Operations and Maintenance Costs

There are no capital or operations and maintenance costs.

(iii) Capital/Start-up Operating and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

There are no capital/startup operating and maintenance costs.

(iv) Annualizing Capital Costs

There are no capital costs.

6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost

                         Annual Agency Burden and Cost

Agency Hours Per Respondent
Total No. Respondents Per Year
Labor Cost Per Year
Overhead Cost Per Year
Subtotal Labor & Overhead Cost
Total Cost Per Year (rounded)
Program Manager Activities
$53 per hour

(60 percent of labor cost)

Distribute form to respondents and answer their questions
60 minutes (1 hour)
75
$3,975
$2385
$6,360

Recordkeeping
30 minutes (0.5 hours)
75
$1988
$1193
$3,181

Screening of applications
60 minutes (1 hour)
75
$3,975
$2385
$6,360

Distribution of applications for review
20 minutes (0.33 hours)
75
$1312
$787
$2099

Forwarding awardee selections to CEQ for vetting
20 minutes (0.33 hours)
75
$1312
$787
$2099

Announcing winners
20 minutes (0.33 hours)
75
$1312
$787
$2099

Program Manager Subtotal
3.5 hours
75
$13,912
$8348
$22,260

$22260
Reviewer Activities
$48 per hour

Reviewing applications
1.5 hours
75
$5400
$3,240
$8,640

Discuss and rank winners
0.5 hours
75
$1800
$1080
$2880

Reviewer Subtotal
2 hours
75
$7200
$4,320
$11,520

Subtotal for 3Reviewers
4 hours

$14,400
$8640
$23,0401
$23,040
EPA Grand Total (Program Manager & Reviewers)
7.5 hours
188 hours for 75 respondents
$28312
$16988
$45,300
$45,300

6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

See 6(a) and (b).

6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables

(i) Respondent Tally

           Bottom-Line Annual Burden and Cost for PIAEE Respondents
PIAEE Respondent Activities to Complete Application Form
Burden Hours/Respondent
Burden for Respondent ($26.67 per labor hour multiplied by 1.6 for overhead equals $43)
Number of Respondents Per Year
Total Annual Burden Hours
Total Cost Per Year
Total Per Year
10 hours
$43
75
430
$32,250

(ii) The Agency Tally

                   Bottom-Line Annual Agency Burden and Cost

Agency Hours for Each Respondent
Number of Hours Per Year
Labor Cost Per Year
Overhead Cost Per Year
Total Agency Cost Per year
Agency Total (Program Manager & Reviewers) for 33 Respondents
7.5 hours
188
$28,312
$16,988
$45,300

(iii) Variations in the Annual Bottom Line

We do not anticipate major variations in the annual bottom line burden hours and costs for the respondents or the Agency.

6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden

This is a renewal collection.

6(g) Burden Statement

The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjusting the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable applications and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit, or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this OCR under Docket Number EPA-HQ-OA-2015-0553, which is available for online viewing at www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Office of Environmental Information Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA William Jefferson Clinton West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m.  -  4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the Office of Environmental Information Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. An electronic version of the public docket is available at www.regulations.gov. This site can be used to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17[th] Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OA-2015-0553and OMB Control No. 2090-renewal in any correspondence.


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 33794]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13932]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

True Product ID, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

June 5, 2012.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
True Product ID, Inc. (``True Product'') because it has not filed a
periodic report since it filed its Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2009, filed on May 20, 2009.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of True Product. Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to
Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in
the securities of True Product is suspended for the period from 9:30
a.m. EDT on June 5, 2012, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on June 18, 2012.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-13932 Filed 6-5-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 20, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43142-43143]
[FR Doc No: 2019-17934]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2019-N-3613]

Antimicrobial Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting;
Establishment of a Public Docket; Request for Comments

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; establishment of a public docket; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announces a forthcoming
public advisory committee meeting of the Antimicrobial Drugs Advisory
Committee. The general function of the committee is to provide advice
and recommendations to FDA on regulatory issues. The meeting will be
open to the public. FDA is establishing a docket for public comment on
this document.

DATES: The meeting will be held on October 16, 2019, from 8:00 a.m. to
4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: FDA White Oak Campus, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31
Conference Center, the Great Room (Rm. 1503), Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002. Answers to commonly asked questions including information
regarding special accommodations due to a disability, visitor parking,
and transportation may be accessed at: https://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm408555.htm.
    FDA is establishing a docket for public comment on this meeting.
The docket number is FDA-2019-N-3613. The docket will close on October
15, 2019. Submit either electronic or written comments on this public
meeting by October 15, 2019. Please note that late, untimely filed
comments will not be considered. Electronic comments must be submitted
on or before October 15, 2019. The https://www.regulations.gov
electronic filing system will accept comments until 11:59 p.m. Eastern
Time at the end of October 15, 2019. Comments received by mail/hand
delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions) will be considered
timely if they are postmarked or the delivery service acceptance
receipt is on or before that date.
    Comments received on or before October 1, 2019, will be provided to
the committee. Comments received after that date will be taken into
consideration by FDA.
    You may submit comments as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2019-N-3613 for ``Antimicrobial Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of
Meeting; Establishment of a Public Docket; Request for Comments.''
Received comments, those filed in a timely manner (see the ADDRESSES
section), will be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted
as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' FDA will review
this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in its
consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the claimed
confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be available for
public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish your name
and contact information be made publicly available, you can provide
this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify the information as ``confidential.'' Any
information marked as ``confidential'' will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA's posting of comments to public dockets, see
80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lauren Tesh Hotaki, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, Rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-9001, Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or FDA Advisory
Committee Information Line, 1-800-

741-8138<PHONE_NUMBER> in the Washington, DC area). A notice in the
Federal Register about last minute modifications that impact a
previously announced advisory committee meeting cannot always be
published quickly enough to provide timely notice. Therefore, you
should always check the FDA's website at https://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm and scroll down to the appropriate
advisory committee meeting link, or call the advisory committee
information line to learn about possible modifications before coming to
the meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Agenda: The committee will discuss new drug application (NDA)
209445, cefiderocol lyophilized powder for intravenous administration,
submitted by Shionogi Inc., for the treatment of complicated urinary
tract infections (cUTI), including pyelonephritis due to gram-negative
bacteria in patients with limited or no alternative treatment options.
    FDA intends to make background material available to the public no
later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post
the background material on its website prior to the meeting, the
background material will be made publicly available at the location of
the advisory committee meeting, and the background material will be
posted on FDA's website after the meeting. Background material is
available at https://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/Calendar/default.htm. Scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee meeting
link.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee.
All electronic and written submissions submitted to the Docket (see the
ADDRESSES section) on or before October 1, 2019, will be provided to
the committee. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled
between approximately 1:30 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. Those individuals
interested in making formal oral presentations should notify the
contact person and submit a brief statement of the general nature of
the evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses
of proposed participants, and an indication of the approximate time
requested to make their presentation on or before September 23, 2019.
Time allotted for each presentation may be limited. If the number of
registrants requesting to speak is greater than can be reasonably
accommodated during the scheduled open public hearing session, FDA may
conduct a lottery to determine the speakers for the scheduled open
public hearing session. The contact person will notify interested
persons regarding their request to speak by September 24, 2019.
    Persons attending FDA's advisory committee meetings are advised
that FDA is not responsible for providing access to electrical outlets.
    For press inquiries, please contact the Office of Media Affairs at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with
disabilities. If you require accommodations due to a disability, please
contact Lauren Tesh Hotaki (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) at
least 7 days in advance of the meeting.
    FDA is committed to the orderly conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our website at https://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm111462.htm for procedures
on public conduct during advisory committee meetings.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: August 14, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-17934 Filed 8-19-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 224 (Monday, November 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 71966]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30025]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL12-9-000]

TC Ravenswood, LLC v. New York Independent System Operator, Inc.,
New York State Reliability Council, LLC; Notice of Complaint

    Take notice that on November 8, 2011, pursuant to sections 206 and
306 of the Federal Power Act, and Rule 206 of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedures,
18 CFR 385.206, TC Ravenswood, LLC (Complainant) filed a complaint
against the New York Independent System Operator, Inc. (NYISO) and the
New York State Reliability Council, L.L.C. (NYSRC), alleging that NYISO
and NYSRC violated NYISO's Market Administration and Control Area
Services Tariff and a Commission order issued on September 27, 2011 \1\
by indicating that both entities continue to treat Complainant's Units
10, 20, and 30 as Black Start Facilities based on a declaratory ruling
issued by the New York Public Service Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ TC Ravenswood, LLC, 136 FERC ] 61,213 (2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Complainant certifies that copies of the complaint were served
on representatives of the NYISO, the NYSRC, and the New York Public
Service Commission.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on November 29, 2011.

    Dated: November 15, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-30025 Filed 11-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 213 (Friday, November 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55162-55163]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23992]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP18-89-000]

Notice of Revised Schedule for Environmental Review of the Empire
Pipeline, Inc., Empire North Project

    This notice identifies the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
staff's revised schedule for the completion of the environmental
assessment (EA) for Empire Pipeline, Inc's Empire North Project. The
first notice of schedule,

issued on August 17, 2018, identified November 20, 2018 as the EA
issuance date. However, staff has received all the information
necessary to complete our review. As a result, staff has revised the
schedule for issuance of the EA.

Schedule for Environmental Review

Issuance of Notice of Availability of the EA--October 30, 2018
90-day Federal Authorization Decision Deadline--January 28, 2019

    If a schedule change becomes necessary, an additional notice will
be provided so that the relevant agencies are kept informed of the
project's progress.

Additional Information

    In order to receive notification of the issuance of the EA and to
keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in specific dockets,
the Commission offers a free service called eSubscription. This can
reduce the amount of time you spend researching proceedings by
automatically providing you with notification of these filings,
document summaries, and direct links to the documents. Go to
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.
    Additional information about the Project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs at (866) 208-FERC or on the
FERC website (www.ferc.gov). Using the eLibrary link, select General
Search from the eLibrary menu, enter the selected date range and Docket
Number excluding the last three digits (i.e., CP18-89), and follow the
instructions. For assistance with access to eLibrary, the helpline can
be reached at<PHONE_NUMBER>, TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>, or at
[email protected]. The eLibrary link on the FERC website also
provides access to the texts of formal documents issued by the
Commission, such as orders, notices, and rule makings.

    Dated: October 26, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-23992 Filed 11-1-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P