[Federal Register: May 21, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 97)]
[Notices]
[Page 23929-23930]
[DOCID:fr21my09-146]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (Final EIS) and the ANILCA Section 810 Analysis of Impacts to
Subsistence Resources for Proposed Improvement Activities at the Sitka
Rocky Gutierrez Airport, Sitka, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT). The Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE), and National Marine Fisheries Services
(NMFS) are cooperating agencies, by virtue of their jurisdictional
authority and/or resource management responsibilities.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and Council on Environmental
Quality regulations (40 CFR part 1500-1508) the Federal Aviation
Administration is issuing this notice to advise the public that the
Final ElS for Proposed Improvement Activities at the Sitka Rocky
Gutierrez Airport (SIT) has been prepared and is available for public
review. Written requests for copies of the Final EIS can be submitted
to the individual listed in the section, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

Final EIS Availability and Review

    Copies of the Final EIS may be viewed during regular business hours
at the following locations:
    1. Federal Aviation Administration, Airports Division, 222 W. 7th
Avenue 14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7504.<PHONE_NUMBER> or (907)
271-5438.
    2. Kettleson Memorial Library, 320 Harbor Drive, Sitka, AK 99835.
(907) 747-8708.
    3. Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, 6860
Glacier Highway, Juneau, AK 99811.
    4. Downtown Juneau Public Library, 292 Marine Way, Juneau, AK
99801.<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The Federal Aviation Administration, Airports Division has a
limited number of CDs of the entire Final EIS and the Executive Summary
available for public

distribution. Please contact the Federal Aviation Administration at
(907) 271-5438 for a copy.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Sitka Rocky Gutierrez Airport Master
Plan outlined development goals and projects that are anticipated to be
necessary over the next 20 or more years at the Airport. This Final EIS
discusses the proposed improvements recommended at the Airport over the
next five years, which have the potential to result in significant
adverse environmental impacts. The FAA and the State of Alaska
Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT & PF) propose
the following projects recommended over the next five years at the
Airport to meet the identified needs. The major actions assessed in
this Final EIS include:
    [ballot] Improvements to the Runway Safety Area.
    [ballot] Extension of the Parallel Taxiway.
    [ballot] Relocation of the Airport Seaplane Pullout.
    [ballot] Installation of an Approach Lighting System.
    [ballot] Repairs and Improvements to the Airport Seawall.
    [ballot] Acquisition of Sufficient Property Rights to Lands Needed
for Existing and Future Aviation and Airport Uses.
    The proposed Airport improvements would be completed during the
2010-2015 time period and, depending on the alternatives implemented,
may result in temporary or long-term impacts to the coastal resources,
marine environment and wildlife (including species protected under the
Endangered Species Act), water quality, wetlands, historical,
architectural, archaeological, and cultural resources, terrestrial
wildlife and vegetation, and subsistence.
    Section 810 of the Alaska National Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA)
requires an evaluation on the effects of alternatives presented in this
Final EIS on subsistence activities occurring on public lands in the
planning area. The evaluation in the Final EIS indicates that none of
the alternatives significantly restrict subsistence activities.
    If the transfer of title option is selected for the acquisition of
property rights, the lands would change from Federal to State
ownership. This would result in the loss of Federal subsistence
regulations applying on those lands and the irreversible loss of
opportunities for a subsistence priority for rural residents from loss
of Federal public lands. A long-term lease or easement would preserve
opportunities for a subsistence priority for rural residents by
retaining Federal ownership of public lands.
    The FAA conducted a public hearing on the Draft EIS October 2, 2008
and received comments on the Draft EIS through October 14, 2008. The
FAA has reviewed and responded to the comments received during the
Draft EIS comment period and made revisions to the EIS as appropriate.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Sullivan. Environmental
Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Alaskan Region, Airports
Division, 222 W. 7th Avenue 14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7504. Ms.
Sullivan may be contacted during business hours at<PHONE_NUMBER>
(phone) and<PHONE_NUMBER> (facsimile).

    Issued in Anchorage, Alaska on May 14, 2009.
Byron K. Huffman,
Mananger, Airports Division, Alaskan Region.
[FR Doc. E9-11764 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 66 (Friday, April 7, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16919-16920]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06896]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2015-0845; FRL-9960-49-Region 5]

Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Part 9 Miscellaneous Rules;
Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final
rule in the Federal Register on December 19, 2016, approving a state
request to EPA to make minor administrative revisions to rules in the
Michigan State Implementation Plan entitled ``Emissions Limitations and
Prohibitions--Miscellaneous.'' An error in the amendatory instruction
is identified and corrected in this action.

DATES: This final rule is effective on April 7, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christos Panos, Environmental
Engineer, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA published a direct final rule document
on December 19, 2016, (81 FR 91839) approving revisions to Michigan
rules in Chapter 336, Part 9, submitted by the State on December 21,
2015. In this approval EPA identified in the amendatory instructions
that we were revising the entries for R 336.1906, R 336.1911, and R
336.1912. However, in the CFR the entries are listed as R 339.1906, R
339.1911, and R 336.1912. Therefore, the amendatory instruction is
being corrected to reflect the correct CFR reference.

Correction

    In the direct final rule published in the Federal Register on
December 19, 2016, (81 FR 91839), on page 91840, third column, in
amendatory instruction 2, in the third line, and in the table at the
top of page 91841, the entries for ``R 336.1906'' and ``R 336.1911''
are corrected to read: ``R 339.1906'' and ``R 339.1911'' respectively.

    Dated: March 14, 2017.
Robert A. Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  52.1170, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entries for R 339.1906, R 339.1911, and R 336.1912 under the
heading ``Part 9. Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--
Miscellaneous'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1170  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                        EPA-Approved Michigan Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              State
       Michigan citation                  Title          effective date  EPA approval date        Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Part 9. Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--Miscellaneous
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
R 339.1906.....................  Diluting and                   5/20/15  12/19/2016, 81 FR
                                  concealing emissions.                   91839.

                                                  * * * * * * *
R 339.1911.....................  Malfunction abatement          5/20/15  12/19/2016, 81 FR
                                  plans.                                  91839.
R 336.1912.....................  Abnormal conditions,           5/20/15  12/19/2016, 81 FR
                                  start-up, shutdown,                     91839.
                                  and malfunction of a
                                  source, process, or
                                  process equipment,
                                  operating,
                                  notification, and
                                  reporting
                                  requirements.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2017-06896 Filed 4-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Dear Mr. Zeller:

I am writing as an individual consumer to request an extension of the comment period for the Food and Drug Administration's ("FDA") Proposed Rule Deeming Tobacco Products to be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking and Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the "Proposed Rule") published at 79 Fed. Reg. 23,142 and Federal Register No. 2014-09491. On behalf of myself, I am requesting that the comment period for the Proposed Rule be extended by the FDA for an additional 105 days, from its current 75-day period, to 180 days.

The Proposed Rule raises a number of significant issues and questions that are important and relevant to me, as a consumer of products that are proposed for regulation under the Proposed Rule. The Proposed Rule asks about a hundred different questions I might want to respond to. I want to provide my thoughts and comments on many of these issues, but my time on these important questions is limited. I have already spent hours researching and dissecting these issues, but they take time. I know that the FDA took years to even come up with the Proposed Rule, so I dont think it is unreasonable to allow the public a mere six months to comment on it. This is our only opportunity, as consumers, to provide our feedback. I really believe that by giving us this opportunity, we can come to a better understanding of the situation being discussed at hand and with better understanding comes better options of dealing with the situation

I feel very strongly about e-cigarettes as an alternative to tradional cigarettes.  I firmly believe that they changed my life for the better. I wish to provide you with my personal story, as well as science- and evidence-based responses to your questions so that you can take my comment into account. I realize that the FDA has the authority under 21 CFR 10.40 to extend this time frame and that the FDA has exercised this authority on numerous occasions in the past. I would therefore ask that you do so here, so that all stakeholders have the opportunity to provide their comments on this proposed regulation.

I appreciate your consideration of my request and am happy to discuss this issue with you further.


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40879-40880]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16860]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2011-0264; FRL-9519-8]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; NSPS for Stationary Source
Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR which is abstracted below describes the
nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before August 10,
2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2011-0264, to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency,
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center, mail code
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB
at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Learia Williams, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the

procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 1320.12. On May 9, 2011 (76 FR 26900),
EPA sought comments on this ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA
received no comments. Any additional comments on this ICR should be
submitted to both EPA and OMB within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OECA-2011-0264, which is available for public viewing
online at http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the
Enforcement and Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The
EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number
for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://www.regulations.gov, to either submit or view public comments, access
the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA
receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about the electronic docket, go to
www.regulations.gov.
    Title: NSPS for Stationary Source Compression Ignition Internal
Combustion Engines (Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2196.04, OMB Control Number 2060-0590.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on August 31, 2012.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for
Stationary Source Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines (40
CFR part 60, Subpart IIII) were proposed on July 11, 2005, promulgated
on July 11, 2006, and amended on June, 8, 2011. The affected entities
are subject to the General Provisions of the NSPS at 40 CFR part 60,
subpart A, and any changes, or additions to the Provisions specified at
40 CFR part 60, subpart IIII.
    Owners or operators of the affected facilities must submit initial
notification, performance tests, and periodic reports and results.
Owners or operators are also required to maintain records of the
occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the
operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the
monitoring system is inoperative.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average one
hour per response. ``Burden'' means the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operators of stationary
source compression ignition internal combustion engines.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 206,410.
    Frequency of Response: Initially and annually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 193,707.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $18,803,009, which includes
$18,560,917 in labor costs, no capital/startup costs, and $242,092 in
operation and maintenance (O&M) costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an adjustment increase in the
total estimated burden hours and a decrease in the total estimated cost
for the respondents as currently identified in the OMB Inventory of
Approved Burdens. This is not due to any program changes. The increase
in burden hours reflects a growth in the respondent universe since the
last ICR renewal. The decrease in costs is due to a mathematical error
that has been corrected since the last ICR.
    There is an adjustment increase in the total estimated burden hours
and costs for the Agency as currently identified in the OMB Inventory
of Approved Burdens. The increase reflects a mathematical correction in
the burden hour calculation and an adjustment in labor rates. This ICR
uses updated labor rates in estimating the burden costs for all labor
categories.

John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-16860 Filed 7-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 47813]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19044]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

 In the Matter of Bergamo Acquisition Corp.; Order of Suspension
of Trading

August 2, 2013.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Bergamo Acquisition Corp. (``Bergamo''). Bergamo is a Delaware
corporation based in Henderson, Nevada, and its stock is currently
quoted on OTC Link, operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. under the
symbol BGMO. Questions have arisen concerning the adequacy and accuracy
of press releases and other public statements concerning Bergamo's
business operations and financial condition.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of Bergamo.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the
above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, on
August 2, 2013 through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on August 15, 2013.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-19044 Filed 8-2-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 213 (Thursday, November 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68238-68239]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28461]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-65654; File No. SR-OCC-2011-08]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Options Clearing Corporation;
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1,
To Provide Specific Authority To Use an Auction Process as One of the
Means To Liquidate a Defaulting Clearing Member's Accounts

October 28, 2011.

I. Introduction

    On July 28, 2011, the Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change SR-OCC-2011-08 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\2\ The proposed rule change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on August 3, 2011.\3\ On September 15, 2011, OCC
filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No. 1 was published in the Federal
Register on September 27, 2011.\4\ The Commission received no comment
letters on the proposed rule change or Amendment No. 1. This order
approves the proposed rule change as modified by Amendment No. 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64982 (July 28, 2011),
76 FR 46867 (August 3, 2011).
    \4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65370 (September 21,
2011), 76 FR 59750 (September 27, 2011). The proposed rule change as
originally filed revises OCC Rule 1104 (margins deposited and
contributions to the Clearing Fund) to clarify that the auction
process is one way to liquidate a defaulting members accounts with
respect to positions and collateral in a defaulting member's
accounts. Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change also revises
OCC Rule 1106 (open positions of a suspended clearing member) in a
similar manner. Accordingly, as amended, the proposed rule change
clarifies that the auction process is one way to liquidate a
defaulting members accounts with respect to positions and collateral
in a defaulting member's accounts under both OCC Rule 1104 and OCC
Rule 1106. Telephone conference between Stephen Szarmack, Vice
President and Associate General Counsel, OCC, and Pamela Kesner,
Special Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission Division of
Trading and Markets, on September 20, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description

    OCC is revising its rules to provide specific authority for OCC to
use an auction process as one of the possible means by which OCC may
liquidate a defaulting clearing member's accounts.\5\ An auction is
likely to be the most efficient and orderly procedure practicable for
closing out clearing member portfolios in some circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The specific language of the proposed provision can be found
at http://www.optionsclearing.com/components/docs/legal/rules_and_bylaws/sr_occ_11_08_a_1.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The liquidation of open long and short positions through exchange
transactions is an obvious means of closing out the positions of a
defaulting member. However, auctions are increasingly viewed as an
efficient and cost effective alternative for liquidating some or all of
a clearing member's positions and collateral, especially where the
positions are very large or in unstable market conditions. As compared
to liquidating positions through exchange transactions, an auction may
usually be expected to result in a shorter liquidation period and
reduced execution risk. During Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.'s
liquidation, clearinghouses such as LCH. Clearnet and CME Clearing
liquidated certain derivatives positions through auctions.
    Chapter XI of OCC's Rules, which governs the liquidation of a
clearing member's accounts in the event of an insolvency, provides that
open positions of a clearing member must be closed by OCC ``in the most
orderly manner practicable.'' While OCC and its counsel believe that
this language is broad enough to authorize a private auction, i.e., an
auction limited to selected bidders, as a means of closing out open
positions, OCC also believes that explicit authorization for a private
auction procedure could reduce the likelihood of a legal challenge
should such a procedure be utilized.

III. Discussion

    Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires that, among other things,
the rules of a clearing agency be designed to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions, and, to
the extent applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and
transactions.\6\ The proposed rule change is designed to ensure OCC has
the tools necessary to liquidate the open positions and margin of a
defaulting member in order to meet its settlement obligations to non-
defaulting members promptly and in a manner that is least disruptive to
the securities markets. OCC has not yet established detailed procedures
for conducting an auction; however, any such auction must comply with
the

requirements of Section 17A, including requirements that the rules of a
clearing agency are, in general, designed to protect investors and the
public interest and are not designed to permit unfair discrimination
among participants in the use of the clearing agency.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in
particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \8\ and the
rules and regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\9\ that the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1,
(File No. SR-OCC-2011-08) be, and hereby is, approved.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \10\ In approving this proposed rule change the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact of efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary .
[FR Doc. 2011-28461 Filed 11-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


65.6
                                                                          131.2
                                                                              0
                                                                   $151,726.90
      5) Records of emission exceedances and periods when emission data not obtained
                                    See 3E

      6) Records of CEMS drift tests and Appendix F accuracy assessments
                                  See 4E 1-4

      7) Records of initial performance test
                                    See 3E

      8) Records of annual performance tests
                                    See 3E

      9) Records of opacity limits for air curtain incinerators
                                    See 3E

   F. Personnel training
                                      N/A

   G. Time for audits
                                      N/A

Subtotal for Recordkeeping

                                    37,113
                                                                    $3,732,112
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (Rounded)[i]

                                    202,000
                                                                   $29,700,000
Capital and O&M Cost

                                                                      $787,000
GRAND TOTAL

                                                                   $30,500,000

Assumptions:
[a.] Assume 162 large MWC units at 63 plants, 49 percent of which are privately owned.
[b.] This ICR uses the following labor rates: $129.93 per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $103.97 per hour for Technical labor, and $51.79 per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of labor Statistics, June 2014, Table 2 Civilian Workers by occupational and industry group, The rates are from column 1, "Total compensation." The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry. The contractor rate was derived by taking the contractor rate used in the previous ICR and multiplying by the average increase in managerial, technical, and clerical rates since the previous ICR.
[c.] This ICR assumes all respondents will have to familiarize with regulatory requirements
[d.] Assume 20 percent of reporting plants must repeat initial tests due to failure at one unit at the plant.
[e.] RATA audits are performed for one of the four quarterly audits. RAA tests are performed for three of the four quarterly audits. Audits of the diluent monitor (O2 or CO2) are not required because tests on SO2 and CO monitors will incorporate the use of the diluent monitor.
[f.] Assume 20 percent of affected plants must submit two semiannual reports per year due to exceeding one or more pollutant emission limits.
[g.] Based on weekly recordkeeping, we assume 47 weeks of operation (90 percent availability) per year per MWC.
[h.] Based on quarterly calculation of sorbent use for entire plant, regardless of the number of affected facilities at the plant.
[i][.] Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding

Table 1c: Average Annual Designated Administrator Burden and Cost  -  Emission Guidelines for Large Municipal Waste Combustors Constructed on or Before September 20, 1994 (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Cb) (Renewal)

                                  Burden Item
                     (A)
Number of Occurences Per Year [a]
                    (B)
Administrator Hours Per Occurrence
                     (C)
Technical Hours Per Year
(C=AxB)
                   (D)
Management Hours Per Year (D=Cx0.05)
                     (E)
Clerical Hours Per Year
(E=Cx0.1)
                     (F)
Administrator Costs Per Year [b]
1.) Applications
                                      N/A

2.) Familiarize with Regulatory Requirements [c]
                                       1
                                      40
                                      40
                                       2
                                       4
                                                                     $2,093.60
3.) Required Activities

   A. Develop a state plan
                                       0
                                     2,080
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
   B. Public Hearing on state plan
                                       0
                                       8
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
   A. Observe initial performance tests

         1) Initial performance tests and test reports (PM, dioxins/furans, opacity, fugitives, HCI, Cd, Pb, Hg)[d]
                                       0
                                      48
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      2) Repeat of initial performance tests [e]
                                       0
                                      10
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
   B. Excess emissions -- enforcement activities [f]
                                      11
                                      24
                                      264
                                     13.2
                                     26.4
                                                                    $13,817.76
   C. Create Information

   D. Gather Information

   E. Report Reviews

      1) Control plan
                                       0
                                       8
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      2) Notification of contract awards
                                       0
                                       8
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      3) Notification of on-site construction start
                                       0
                                       8
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      4) Notification of construction completion
                                       0
                                       8
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      5) Notification of final compliance
                                       0
                                       8
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      6) Review notification of initial performance test
                                       0
                                       8
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      7) Review notification of initial CEMS demonstration
                                       0
                                       4
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      8) Review notification of starting or stopping use of the CEMS
                                       0
                                       8
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      9) Review initial performance test report
                                       0
                                      40
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      10) Review initial CEMS demonstration report
                                       0
                                      40
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      11) Review annual compliance report [g]
                                      55
                                      40
                                     2,200
                                      110
                                      220
                                                                   $115,148.00
      12) Review semi-annual excess emission report [f]
                                      11
                                      16
                                      176
                                      8.8
                                     17.6
                                                                     $9,211.84
      13) Review of notifications of exemption
                                       0
                                       4
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
   F. Prepare annual summary report
                                       0
                                      200
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)[h]

                                     3,080
                                                                      $140,000

Assumptions:
[a.] Assume 144 affected units as 55 plants in 18 states.
[b.] The cost is based on the following labor rates which incorporates a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead expenses $62.27 Managerial rate (GS-13, Step 5, $38.92 x 1.6), $46.21 Technical rate (GS-12, Step 1, $28.88 x 1.6), and $25.01 Clerical rate (GS-6, Step 3, $15.63 x 1.6). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 2014 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay.
[c.] This ICR assumes all respondents will have to familiarize with regulatory requirements
[d.] Assume EPA personnel attend about 8 percent of tests (145 units tested x 8 percent attended =12)
[e.] Assume a 20 percent failure rate and that EPA personnel attend 10 percent of the retests (7 units tested *20 percent failure* 10 percent retests attended = 1).
[f.] Assume 20 percent of affected plants must submit two semiannual reports per year due to exceeding one or more pollutant emission limits.
[g.] Burden not incurred until second year of operation and later.
[h.] Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding

Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost  -  Emission Guidelines for Large Municipal Waste Combustors Constructed on or Before September 20, 1994 (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Cb) (Renewal)

                                  Burden Item
                    (A)
Number of Occurrences Per Year [a]
                    (B)
Administrator Hours Per Occurrence
                     (C)
Technical Hours Per Year
(C=AxB)
                   (D)
Management Hours Per Year (D=Cx0.05)
                     (E)
Clerical Hours Per Year
(E=Cx0.1)
                     (F)
Administrator Costs Per Year [b]
1.) Applications
                                      N/A

2.) Familiarize with Regulatory Requirements
                                       0
                                      40
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
3.) Required Activities

   A. Observe initial performance tests

         1) Initial performance tests and test reports (PM, dioxins/furans, opacity, fugitives, HCI, Cd, Pb, Hg)[c]
                                       0
                                      48
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      2) Repeat of initial performance tests [d]
                                       0
                                      10
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
   B. Excess emissions -- enforcement activities [e]
                                      1.6
                                      24
                                     38.4
                                     1.92
                                     3.84
                                                                     $2,009.86
   C. Create Information

   D. Gather Information

   E. Report Reviews

      1) Control plan
                                       0
                                       8
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      2) Notification of contract awards
                                       0
                                       8
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      3) Notification of on-site construction start
                                       0
                                       8
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      4) Notification of construction completion
                                       0
                                       8
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      5) Notification of final compliance
                                       0
                                       8
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      6) Review notification of initial performance test
                                       0
                                       8
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      7) Review notification of initial CEMS demonstration
                                       0
                                       4
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      8) Review notification of starting or stopping use of the CEMS
                                       0
                                       8
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      9) Review initial performance test report
                                       0
                                      40
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      10) Review initial CEMS demonstration report
                                       0
                                      40
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
      11) Review annual compliance report [f]
                                       8
                                      40
                                      320
                                      16
                                      32
                                                                    $16,748.80
      12) Review semi-annual excess emission report [e]
                                      1.6
                                      16
                                     25.6
                                     1.28
                                     2.56
                                                                     $1,339.90
      13) Review of notifications of exemption
                                       0
                                       4
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
   F. Prepare annual summary report
                                       0
                                      200
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)[g]

                                      442
                                                                       $20,100

Assumptions:
[a.] Assumes 18 affected units at 8 plants in 4 states.
[b.] The cost is based on the following labor rates which incorporates a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead expenses $62.27 Managerial rate (GS-13, Step 5, $38.92 x 1.6), $46.21 Technical rate (GS-12, Step 1, $28.88 x 1.6), and $25.01 Clerical rate (GS-6, Step 3, $15.63 x 1.6). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 2014 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay.
[c.] Assume EPA personnel attend about 8 percent of tests (22 units tested x 8 percent attended = 2).
[d.] Assume a 20 percent failure rate and that EPA personnel attend 10 percent of the retests (7 units tested *20 percent failure* 10 percent retests attended = 1)
[e.] Assumes 20 percent of affected plants must submit two semiannual reports per year due to exceeding one or more pollutant emission limits.
[f.] Burden not incurred until second year of operation and later.
[g][.] Totals have been rounded to 3 significant digits. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.


[Federal Register: December 13, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 239)]
[Notices]
[Page 70928-70929]
[DOCID:fr13de07-116]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

Safety Advisory 2007-04

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of safety advisory; potential catastrophic failure of
locomotive reservoir tanks.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In April 2005, FRA issued Safety Advisory 2005-02 in order to
provide information to interested parties on the potential catastrophic
failure of locomotive main reservoir tanks manufactured by R&R Metal
Fabricators, Incorporated, and installed on General Electric
Transportation System (GETS) locomotives. FRA is issuing this document,
Safety Advisory 2007-04, in order to provide updated information
related to this issue.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Scerbo, Railroad Safety
Specialist, Motive Power and Equipment Division (RRS-14), FRA Office of
Safety Assurance and Compliance, 1120 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20590, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER> or Michael Masci, Staff Attorney,
FRA Office of Chief Counsel, 1120 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20590, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In early 2005, GETS provided FRA information
on the potential catastrophic failure of locomotive main reservoir
tanks, manufactured by R&R Metal Fabricators, Incorporated, and
installed on GETS locomotives. At that time, GETS reported that 5,826
suspect main reservoir tanks were manufactured between 1988 and 1995.
Prior to the issuance of Safety Advisory 2005-02, four main reservoir
tanks had failed catastrophically (ruptured) while in service. Since
the issuance of Safety Advisory 2005-02, two additional reservoir tanks
have failed and several others have been removed from service for
various other reasons. GETS describes the ruptures as a rapid splitting
and deformation of the reservoir tank along the longitudinal seam.
Catastrophic failure of the main reservoir tank can result in serious
injury or worse to anyone in the vicinity of the tank at the time of
failure.
    In 2005, GETS produced a list of approximately twenty-seven hundred
(2,700) locomotives that have likely been equipped with the suspect
reservoirs. GETS noted that additional suspect reservoirs may have been
mounted onto GETS locomotives through maintenance and repair. No other
locomotive manufacturer has produced any locomotives equipped with the
suspect main reservoir tanks, and any attempt to do so would require
major modifications to the mounting system. All suspect reservoir tanks
can be identified by a name plate which shows R&R attached to the skin
of the tank.
    On September 12, 2007, GETS notified FRA that its earlier
instructions to inspect and measure the reservoir tanks and replace
only those that fail to meet the criteria proved to be only partially
effective in identifying the at risk tanks. To minimize the possibility
of any additional reservoir tank failures, GETS has advised all known
owners and users of the affected locomotives equipped with the involved
R&R Metal Fabricators, Incorporated reservoir tanks to replace them by
September 30, 2008, or sooner. Any owner or user of these reservoir
tanks should contact GETS for replacement of the reservoir tanks at no
cost.
    Recommended Action: In recognition of the need to assure safety,
FRA recommends that railroads operating and owning GETS locomotives
inspect the main reservoir tanks of such locomotives in service and any
main reservoir tanks in inventory to determine if they were
manufactured by R&R Metal Fabricators, Incorporated, between 1988 and
1995. If any such locomotive reservoir tanks are found, the owner or
operator of the locomotive should contact Mr. Len Baran, GETS Product
Manager, at General Electric Transportation Systems, 2901 East Lake
Road, Building 14-410, Erie, Pennsylvania 16531, or by e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    FRA may modify this Safety Advisory 2007-04, issue additional
safety advisories, or take other appropriate

action necessary to ensure the highest level of safety on the nations
railroads.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 7, 2007.
Jo Strang,
Associate Administrator for Safety.
 [FR Doc. E7-24196 Filed 12-12-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 31 (Thursday, February 14, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4105-4106]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02239]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2006-0028]

MET Laboratories, Inc.: Grant of Expansion of Recognition and
Modification to the NRTL Program's List of Appropriate Test Standards

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this notice, OSHA announces its final decision to expand
the scope of recognition for MET Laboratories, Inc., as a Nationally
Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL). Additionally, OSHA announces the
addition of one test standard to the NRTL Program's List of Appropriate
Test Standards.

DATES: The expansion of the scope of recognition becomes effective on
February 14, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information regarding this notice is
available from the following sources:
    Press inquiries: Contact Mr. Frank Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office
of Communications, U.S. Department of Labor; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    General and technical information: Contact Mr. Kevin Robinson,
Director, Office of Technical Programs and Coordination Activities,
Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor; telephone:
(202) 693-2110; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>OSHA's web page includes
information about the NRTL Program (see http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/index.html).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Notice of Final Decision

    OSHA hereby gives notice of the expansion of the scope of
recognition of MET Laboratories, Inc. (MET), as a NRTL. MET's expansion
covers the addition of one test standards to its scope of recognition.
Additionally, OSHA announces the addition of one test standard to the
NRTL Program's List of Appropriate Test Standards.
    OSHA recognition of a NRTL signifies that the organization meets
the requirements specified by 29 CFR 1910.7. Recognition is an
acknowledgment that the organization can perform independent safety
testing and certification of the specific products covered within its
scope of recognition and is not a delegation or grant of government
authority. As a result of recognition, employers may use products
properly approved by the NRTL to meet OSHA standards that require
testing and certification of the products.
    The agency processes applications by a NRTL for initial
recognition, or for expansion or renewal of this recognition, following
requirements in Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7. This appendix requires
that the agency publish two notices in the Federal Register in
processing an application. In the first notice, OSHA announces the
application and provides a preliminary finding and, in the second
notice, the agency provides the final decision on the application.
These notices set forth the NRTL's scope of recognition or
modifications of that scope. OSHA maintains an informational web page
for each NRTL that details its scope of recognition. These pages are
available from the agency's website at http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/index.html.
    MET submitted an application, dated January 29, 2016 (OSHA-2006-
0028-0046), to expand its recognition to include one additional test
standard. OSHA staff performed a detailed analysis of the application
packet and reviewed other pertinent information. OSHA did not perform
any on-site reviews in relation to this application.
    OSHA published the preliminary notice announcing MET's expansion
application and proposed addition to the NRTL List of Appropriate Test
Standards in the Federal Register on July 24, 2018 (83 FR 35026). The
agency requested comments by August 8, 2018, but it received no
comments in response to this notice. OSHA now is proceeding with this
final notice to grant expansion of MET's scope of recognition.
    To obtain or review copies of all public documents pertaining to
MET's application, go to http://www.regulations.gov or contact the
Docket Office, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Room N-3653,
Washington, DC 20210. Docket No. OSHA-2006-0028 contains all materials
in the record concerning MET's recognition.

II. Final Decision and Order

    OSHA staff examined MET's expansion application, the capability to
meet the requirements of the test standards, and other pertinent
information. Based on a review of this evidence, OSHA finds that MET
meets the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.7 for expansion of the
recognition, subject to the specified limitation and conditions listed.
OSHA, therefore, is proceeding with this final notice to grant MET's
scope of recognition. OSHA limits the expansion of MET's recognition to
testing and certification of products for demonstration of conformance
to the test standard listed, in Table 1.

 Table 1--List of Appropriate Test Standard for Inclusion in MET's NRTL
                          Scope of Recognition
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Test standard                     Test standard title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
UL 1598C...............................  Standard for Light Emitting
                                          Diode (LED) Retrofit Luminaire
                                          Conversion Kits.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In this notice, OSHA also announces the addition of a new test
standard to the NRTL Program's List of Appropriate Test Standards.
Table 2, below, lists the test standard that is new to the NRTL
Program. OSHA has determined that this test standard is an appropriate
test standard and will include it in the NRTL Program's List of
Appropriate Test Standards.

   Table 2--Test Standard OSHA Is Adding to the NRTL Program's List of
                       Appropriate Test Standards
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Test standard                     Test standard title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
UL 1598C...............................  Standard for Light Emitting
                                          Diode (LED) Retrofit Luminaire
                                          Conversion Kits.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OSHA's recognition of any NRTL for a particular test standard is
limited to equipment or materials for which OSHA standards require
third-party testing and certification before using them in the
workplace. Consequently, if a test standard also covers any products
for which OSHA does not require such testing and certification, a
NRTL's scope of recognition does not include these products.
    The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) may approve the
test standards listed above as American National Standards. However,
for convenience, the use of the designation of the standards-developing
organization for the standard as opposed to the ANSI designation may
occur. Under the NRTL Program's policy (see OSHA Instruction CPL 1-0.3,
Appendix C, paragraph XIV), any NRTL recognized for a particular test
standard may use either the proprietary version of the test standard or
the ANSI version of that standard. Contact ANSI to determine whether a
test standard is currently ANSI-approved.

A. Conditions

    In addition to those conditions already required by 29 CFR 1910.7,
MET must abide by the following conditions of the recognition:
    1. MET must inform OSHA as soon as possible, in writing, of any
change of ownership, facilities, or key personnel, and of any major
change in its operations as a NRTL, and provide details of the
change(s);
    2. MET must meet all the terms of its recognition and comply with
all OSHA policies pertaining to this recognition; and
    3. MET must continue to meet the requirements for recognition,
including all previously published conditions on MET's scope of
recognition, in all areas for which it has recognition.
    Pursuant to the authority in 29 CFR 1910.7, OSHA hereby expands the
scope of recognition of MET, subject to the limitation and conditions
specified above.

III. Authority and Signature

    Loren Sweatt, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, authorized the preparation of this notice.
Accordingly, the Agency is issuing this notice pursuant to 29 U.S.C.
657(g)(2), Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012 (77 FR 3912, Jan. 25,
2012), and 29 CFR 1910.7.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on February 8, 2019.
Loren Sweatt,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2019-02239 Filed 2-13-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 237 (Thursday, December 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76741-76742]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31059]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0107; Notice 1]

Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming
Model Year 2012 Fisker Karma Passenger Cars Are Eligible for
Importation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Receipt of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces receipt by the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that
model year (MY) 2012 Fisker Karma passenger cars (PC) that were not
originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor
vehicle safety standards (FMVSS), are eligible for importation into the
United States because they are substantially similar to vehicles that
were originally manufactured for sale in the United States and that
were certified by their manufacturer as complying with the safety
standards (the U.S.-certified version of the 2012 Fisker Karma PC) and
they are capable of being readily altered to conform to the standards.

DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is January 11,
2016.

ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Comments must be written in the English language, and
be no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to
the length of necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are
submitted in hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive confirmation that your comments were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
    How To Read Comments submitted to the Docket: You may read the
comments received by Docket Management at the address and times given
above. You may also view the documents from the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets. The docket ID number and title of this notice are shown at the
heading of this document notice. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue to file relevant information in
the Docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit
late comments. Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically search
the Docket for new material.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Stevens, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA<PHONE_NUMBER>).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not
originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS shall be
refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that
the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle
originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United
States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS.
    Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either
manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to
49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice
in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords
interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the
close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is
eligible for importation. The agency then

publishes this decision in the Federal Register.
    Wallace Environmental Testing Laboratories (WETL), Inc. of Houston,
Texas (Registered Importer R-90-005) has petitioned NHTSA to decide
whether nonconforming 2012 Fisker Karma PC's are eligible for
importation into the United States. The vehicles which WETL believes
are substantially similar are MY 2012 Fisker Karma PC's sold in the
United States and certified by their manufacturer as conforming to all
applicable FMVSS.
    The petitioner claims that it compared non-U.S. certified MY 2012
Fisker Karma PC's to their U.S.-certified counterparts, and found the
vehicles to be substantially similar with respect to compliance with
most FMVSS.
    WETL submitted information with its petition intended to
demonstrate that non-U.S. certified MY 2012 Fisker Karma PC's, as
originally manufactured, conform to many applicable FMVSS in the same
manner as their U.S.-certified counterparts, or are capable of being
readily altered to conform to those standards. Specifically, the
petitioner claims that the non U.S.-certified MY 2012 Fisker Karma
PC's, as originally manufactured, conform to: Standard Nos. 102
Transmission Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission
Braking Effect, 103 Windshield Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104
Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems, 105 Hydraulic and Electric Brake
Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 113 Hood Latch System, 114 Theft Protection,
116 Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids, 118 Power-Operated Window, Partition,
and Roof panel System, 124 Accelerator Control Systems, 126 Electronic
Stability Control Systems, 138 Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems, 201
Occupant Protection in Interior Impact, 202a Head Restraints, 204
Steering Control Rearward Displacement, 205 Glazing Materials, 206 Door
Locks and Door Retention Components, 207 Seating Systems, 210 Seat Belt
Assembly Anchorages, 212 Windshield Mounting, 214 Side Impact
Protection, 216 Roof Crush Resistance, 219 Windshield Zone Intrusion,
225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems, 301 Fuel System Integrity, 302
Flammability of Interior Materials, and 401 Interior Trunk Release.
    The petitioner also contends that the subject non-U.S certified
vehicles are capable of being readily altered to meet the following
standards, in the manner indicated:
    Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: Replacement of the
speedometer with U.S. model components and addition of the brake
warning indicator to fully comply with the standard.
    Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated
Equipment: Replacement of the rear side markers with U.S.-conforming
components.
    Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims: Installation of the
required tire information placard.
    Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors: Inscription of the required
warning statement on the face of the passenger mirror.
    Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: Replacement of the
passenger seatbelt assembly, passenger front airbag module, left knee
bolster, right knee bolster, and the instrument cluster with U.S. model
components.
    Standard No. 209 Seat Belt Assemblies: Replacement of the passenger
seat belt assembly with U.S. model components.
    The petitioner additionally states that a vehicle identification
plate must be affixed to the vehicle near the left windshield pillar to
meet the requirements of 49 CFR part 565.
    All comments received before the close of business on the closing
date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for
examination in the docket at the above addresses both before and after
that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing
date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(B), and (b)(1); 49
CFR 593.7; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.

Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-31059 Filed 12-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48854-48855]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20147]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. CP11-522-000]

Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Request
Under Blanket Authorization

    Take notice that on July 26, 2011, Williston Basin Interstate
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), 1250 West Century Avenue, Bismarck,
North Dakota 58503 filed a prior notice request in accordance with
sections 157.210 and 157.216 of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission's (Commission) Regulations under the Natural Gas Act and
Williston Basin's blanket certificate issued in Docket Nos. CP82-487-
000, et al., to replace approximately 9.5 miles of 10-inch diameter
pipeline with new 12-inch diameter pipeline located in Carbon County,
Montana. Additionally, Williston Basin proposes to abandon in place the
existing 9.5 miles of 10-inch diameter pipeline and remove all exposed
pipe and the existing 12 Mile Valve. Williston Basin states that the
replacement project will cost $4,722,550, all as more fully set forth
in the application, which is open to the public for inspection. The
filing may also be viewed on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-
free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions regarding the application should be directed to Keith
A. Tiggelaar, Director of Regulatory Affairs, Williston Basin
Interstate Pipeline Company, 1250 West Century Avenue, Bismarck, North
Dakota 58503, or telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Any person may, within 60 days after the issuance of the instant
notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's
Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene

or notice of intervention. Any person filing to intervene or the
Commission's staff may, pursuant to section 157.205 of the Commission's
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) file a protest to the
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day
after the time allowed for protest. If a protest is filed and not
withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest,
the instant request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to section 7 of the NGA.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentors will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests, and interventions via the internet in lieu of paper. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a) (1) (iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site (http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link. Persons unable
to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the
protest or intervention to the Federal Energy regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

    Dated: August 3, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-20147 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 220 (Friday, November 13, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72671-72672]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25131]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-D-0052]

Documenting Electronic Data Files and Statistical Analysis
Programs; Guidance for Industry; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a final guidance for industry (GFI) #197 entitled
``Documenting Electronic Data Files and Statistical Analysis
Programs.'' This guidance is intended to inform sponsors of
recommendations for documenting electronic data files and statistical
analyses submitted to the Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) to
support new animal drug applications.

DATES: The announcement of the guidance is published in the Federal
Register on November 13, 2020.

ADDRESSES: You may submit either electronic or written comments on
Agency guidances at any time as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2009-D-0052 for ``Documenting Electronic Data Files and Statistical
Analysis Programs.'' Received comments will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets
Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 240-
402-7500.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
    Submit written requests for single copies of the guidance to the
Policy and Regulations Staff (HFV-6), Center for Veterinary Medicine,
Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855.
Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in
processing your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the guidance document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Virginia Recta, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV-160), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of GFI #197 entitled
``Documenting Electronic Data Files and Statistical Analysis
Programs.'' In the Federal Register of May 21, 2018 (83 FR 23468), FDA
published the notice of availability for a draft guidance entitled
``Documenting Electronic Data Files and Statistical Analysis
Programs,'' giving interested persons until July 20, 2018, to comment
on the draft guidance. On July 20, 2018, FDA published a notice of
availability announcing the extension of the comment period to October
18, 2018 (83 FR 34595). FDA received numerous comments on the draft
guidance and these comments were considered as the guidance was
finalized. The guidance announced in this notice finalizes the draft
guidance dated May 2018.
    This guidance is intended to inform sponsors of recommendations for

documenting electronic data files and statistical analyses submitted to
CVM to support new animal drug applications. These recommendations are
intended to reduce the number of revisions that may be required for CVM
to effectively review data submissions. They are also intended to
simplify submission preparation for sponsors by providing a suggested
documentation framework, including a sample structure on how to
describe and organize the information regarding the electronic data
files and statistical analysis programs.
    This Level I guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents
the current thinking of FDA on ``Documenting Electronic Data Files and
Statistical Analysis Programs.'' It does not establish any rights for
any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable
statutes and regulations.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This guidance contains no collection of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) is not
required.
    However, this guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information. These collections of information are subject to review by
OMB under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). The collections of information
in 21 CFR part 514 have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0032.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the internet may obtain the guidance at
either https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/guidance-regulations/guidance-industry or https://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: November 9, 2020.
Lauren K. Roth,
Acting Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-25131 Filed 11-12-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 14, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21253-21255]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09925]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[EPA-R05-OAR-2018-0224; FRL-9993-54-Region 5]

Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Ohio;
Redesignation of the Lake County Sulfur Dioxide Nonattainment Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is redesignating the Lake County sulfur dioxide
(SO2) nonattainment area from nonattainment to attainment.
EPA is also approving Ohio's maintenance plan, which Ohio submitted on
April 9, 2018. EPA has approved Ohio's State Implementation Plan (SIP)
for Lake County, and the air quality in the area is meeting the
SO2 standard.

DATES: This final rule is effective on May 14, 2019.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2018-0224. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
through www.regulations.gov or at the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We recommend
that you telephone Mary Portanova, Environmental Engineer, at (312)
353-5954, before visiting the Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Portanova, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. Background
II. Public Comments
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.

I. Background

    In 2010, EPA established a revised primary SO2 national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) of 75 parts per billion (ppb) (75
FR 35520, June 22, 2010). EPA designated the Lake County area as
nonattainment for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS on August 5, 2013 (78
FR 47191) based upon air quality monitoring data for calendar years
2009-2011. The Lake County nonattainment area is comprised of the
entirety of Lake County, Ohio.
    Ohio was required to prepare a nonattainment plan that would
provide for attainment of the NAAQS by the SO2 attainment
date of October 4, 2018 and meet the requirements of sections 172(c)
and 191-192 of the CAA. Ohio submitted its plan on April 3, 2015, and
supplemented it on October 13, 2015, and on March 13, 2017. EPA
approved the Lake County nonattainment plan on February 14, 2019 (84 FR
3986).
    Under CAA section 107(d)(3)(E), there are five criteria which must
be met before a nonattainment area may be redesignated to attainment.
The relevant NAAQS must be attained in the area; the applicable
implementation plan must be fully approved by EPA under section 110(k);
the improvement in air quality must be determined to be due to
permanent and enforceable reductions in emissions; the State must meet
all applicable requirements for the area under section 110 and part D;
and EPA must fully approve a maintenance plan and contingency plan for
the area under section 175A of the CAA. On March 8, 2019 (84 FR 8492),
EPA proposed to find that these five criteria have been met for the
Lake County nonattainment area, and thus, EPA proposed to redesignate
Lake County from nonattainment to attainment of the 2010 SO2
NAAQS.

II. Public Comments

    EPA received no public comments on the March 8, 2019 proposal to
redesignate Lake County.

III. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is redesignating the Lake County nonattainment area from
nonattainment to attainment of the SO2 NAAQS. Ohio has
demonstrated that the area is attaining the SO2 standard,
and that the improvement in air quality is due to permanent and
enforceable SO2 emission reductions in the nonattainment
area. EPA is also approving Ohio's maintenance plan, which is designed
to ensure that the area will continue to maintain the SO2
standard.
    In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d), EPA finds there is good cause
for these actions to become effective immediately upon publication.
This is because a delayed effective date is unnecessary due to the
nature of a redesignation to attainment, which relieves the area from
certain CAA requirements that would otherwise apply to it. The
immediate effective date for this action is authorized under both 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(1), which provides that rulemaking actions may become
effective less than 30 days after publication if the rule ``grants or
recognizes an exemption or relieves a restriction,'' and section
553(d)(3), which allows an effective date less than 30 days after
publication ``as otherwise provided by the agency for good cause found
and published with the rule.'' The purpose of the 30-day waiting period
prescribed in section 553(d) is to give affected parties a reasonable
time to adjust their behavior and prepare before the final rule takes
effect. This rule, however, does not create any new regulatory
requirements such that affected parties would need time to prepare
before the rule takes effect. Rather, this rule relieves the State of
planning requirements for this PM2.5 nonattainment area. For
these reasons, EPA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for these
actions to become effective on the date of publication of these
actions.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, redesignation of an area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of the maintenance plan under CAA section
107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the status of the geographical
area and do

not impose any additional regulatory requirements on sources beyond
those required by state law. A redesignation to attainment does not in
and of itself impose any new requirements, but rather results in the
application of requirements contained in the CAA for areas that have
been redesignated to attainment. Moreover, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions
of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40
CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to
approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 15, 2019. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Sulfur oxides.

40 CFR Part 81

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.

    Dated: May 2, 2019.
Cheryl L. Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  52.1870, the table in paragraph (e) is amended under
``Summary of Criteria Pollutant Maintenance Plan'' by adding an entry
for ``SO2 (2010)'' before the entry ``CO (1979)'' to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.1870  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                         EPA-Approved Ohio Nonregulatory and Quasi-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Applicable
               Title                 geographical or non-    State date         EPA approval         Comments
                                       attainment area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 Summary of Criteria Pollutant Maintenance Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
SO2 (2010)........................  Lake County..........        4/9/2018  5/14/2019 [insert      ..............
                                                                            Federal Register
                                                                            citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PART 81--DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES

0
3. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

0
4. Section 81.336 is amended by revising the entry ``Lake County, OH''
in the table entitled ``Ohio--2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS (Primary)'' to
read as follows:

Sec.  81.336  Ohio.

* * * * *

                Ohio--2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS (Primary)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                Designation
       Designated area \1\       ---------------------------------------
                                     Date \2\              Type
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              * * * * * * *
Lake County, OH.................       5/14/2019  Attainment.
    Lake County.................

                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Includes any Indian country in each county or area, unless otherwise
  specified. EPA is not determining the boundaries of any area of Indian
  country in this table, including any area of Indian country located in
  the larger designation area. The inclusion of any Indian country in
  the designation area is not a determination that the state has
  regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act for such Indian country.
\2\ This date is April 9, 2018, unless otherwise noted.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2019-09925 Filed 5-13-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P