[Federal Register: May 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 91)]
[Notices]
[Page 26750-26751]
[DOCID:fr12my10-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-R04-OAR-2009-0751-201022(c); FRL-9150-4]

Adequacy Status of the Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, North Carolina
1997 PM2.5 Attainment; Demonstration Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget for
Transportation Conformity Purposes

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of adequacy; correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 1, 2010, EPA published a notice in the Federal
Register to notify the public of an adequacy determination that the
Agency made with regards to the motor vehicle emissions budget (MVEB)
for nitrogen oxides (NOX) and for an insignificance
determination related to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) for
mobile sources' overall contribution to the PM2.5 pollution
in the Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir area (hereafter referred to as the
Hickory Area). In that notice, EPA identified the units of measure for
the NOX MVEB as kilograms per day (kgd). EPA is publishing
this amendment to correctly identify the units of measure for the
NOX MVEB as kilograms per year (kgy). Additionally, the
March 1, 2010, Federal Register notice included an inadvertent error to
the docket ID number which is being corrected in this action.

DATES: This action is effective May 12, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the documentation used in the action being
corrected are available for inspection during normal business hours at
the following location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4,
61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The Regional
Office's official hours of business are Monday through

Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amanetta Somerville, Environmental
Scientist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Ms. Somerville can be reached
at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or via electronic mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 21, 2009, the State of North
Carolina, through the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (NCDENR), submitted the attainment demonstration for
the 1997 PM2.5 nonattainment area for the Hickory Area. The
Hickory 1997 PM2.5 nonattainment area is comprised of
Catawba County, North Carolina. North Carolina's attainment
demonstration included a MVEB for NOX and an insignificance
finding for the overall contribution of direct PM2.5 from
mobile sources to the PM2.5 pollution in Catawba County.
    EPA Region 4 sent a letter to NCDENR on January 20, 2010, stating
that the 2009 NOX MVEB in the 1997 PM2.5
attainment demonstration for the Hickory Area was adequate for the
purposes of transportation conformity purposes. The letter identified
the NOX MVEB as 2,887,955 kgd. Subsequently, in response to
North Carolina's submission, on March 1, 2010, EPA notified the public
of its finding of adequacy for the NOX MVEB and also
identified the NOX MVEB as 2,887,955 kgd. The units of
measure provided in North Carolina's submission for the NOX
MVEB are actually kgy and not kgd so EPA is correcting this error. The
March 1, 2010, rulemaking also contained an inadvertent error to the
docket ID number, published as EPA-R04-OAR-2009-0561. The correct
docket ID number is EPA-R04-OAR-2009-0751, which EPA is correcting
through this action.
    On April 20, 2010, EPA sent a letter to North Carolina noting this
error and announcing that a correcting amendment (this notice) would be
published soon to alert the public to this correction. Below identifies
the correct NOX MVEBs for the Hickory Area.

                          Hickory Area NOX MVEB
                          [Kilograms per year]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                2009
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Catawba County............................................    2,887,995
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 3, 2010.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2010-11304 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: December 28, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 249)]
[Notices]
[Page 78170]
[DOCID:fr28de06-42]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-200-158]

CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Negotiated
Rate Filing

December 19, 2006.
    Take notice that on December 15, 2006, CenterPoint Energy Gas
Transmission Company (CEGT) tendered for filing and approval a
negotiated rate transaction between CEGT and XTO Energy Company. CEGT
states that it has entered into an agreement to provide firm
transportation service to this shipper under Rate Schedule FT and
requests the Commission accept and approve the transaction under which
transportation service will commence upon the ``in-service'' date
following completion of certain Line CP facilities.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Sec.  154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone
filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on
the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before
the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-22222 Filed 12-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: November 20, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 223)]
[Notices]
[Page 60255]
[DOCID:fr20no09-61]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-228-000]

Star Point Wind Project LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

November 13, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Star Point Wind Project LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is December 3, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-27919 Filed 11-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 83554]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28376]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OLEM-2020-0527; FRL-10017-07-OLEM]
RIN 2050-ZA18

Interim PFAS Destruction and Disposal Guidance; Notice of
Availability for Public Comment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020
(FY 2020 NDAA) was signed into law on December 19, 2019. Section 7361
of the FY 2020 NDAA directs the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) to publish interim guidance on the destruction and disposal of
perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and materials
containing PFAS. The EPA is releasing the interim guidance for public
comment. The guidance provides information on technologies that may be
feasible and appropriate for the destruction or disposal of PFAS and
PFAS-containing materials. It also identifies needed and ongoing
research and development activities related to destruction and disposal
technologies, which may inform future guidance.

DATES: Comments must be received on or February 22, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No EPA-HQ-
OLEM-2020-0527, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov/
(our preferred method). Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Agency website: www.epa.gov/pfas. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket
Center, OLEM Docket, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20460.
     Hand Delivery/Courier: EPA Docket Center, WJC West
Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004.
The Docket Center's hours of operations are 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m.,
Monday-Friday (except Federal Holidays).
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received may be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal information
provided.
    Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our
staff, the EPA Docket Center and Reading Room are closed to the public,
with limited exceptions, to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID-19.
Our Docket Center staff will continue to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. We encourage the public to
submit comments via https://www.regulations.gov/, as there may be a
delay in processing mail and faxes. Hand deliveries and couriers may be
received by scheduled appointment only. For further information on EPA
Docket Center services and the current status, please visit us online
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carlos Pachon, TIFSD, OSRTI, OLEM,
5023P, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW;
email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit www.epa.gov/pfas.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to Me?

    This interim guidance provides a summary of EPA's current knowledge
of technologies for destruction or disposal of PFAS and PFAS-containing
materials. This information may be useful to EPA staff, other federal
agencies, states, tribes, and local governments, the public, including
environmental and public interest groups, as well as commercial and
industry groups.

Peter Wright,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Land and Emergency Management.
[FR Doc. 2020-28376 Filed 12-18-20; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32227-32231]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11499]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket No. PHMSA-2016-0004]

Pipeline Safety: Request for Special Permit; Tennessee Gas
Pipeline Company, LLC

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA);
DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: PHMSA is publishing this notice to solicit public comments on
a request for special permit renewal received from Tennessee Gas
Pipeline Company, LLC (TGP). The special permit request is seeking
relief from compliance with certain requirements in the federal
pipeline safety regulations. At the conclusion of the 30-day comment
period, PHMSA will review the comments received from this notice as
part of its evaluation to grant

or deny the special permit renewal request.

DATES: Submit any comments regarding this special permit request by
June 27, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Comments should reference the docket number for this special
permit request and may be submitted in the following ways:
     E-Gov Website: http://www.Regulations.gov. This site
allows the public to enter comments on any Federal Register notice
issued by any agency.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
     Mail: Docket Management System: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Docket Management System: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
    Instructions: You should identify the docket number for the special
permit request you are commenting on at the beginning of your comments.
If you submit your comments by mail, please submit two (2) copies. To
receive confirmation that PHMSA has received your comments, please
include a self-addressed stamped postcard. Internet users may submit
comments at http://www.Regulations.gov.

    Note: There is a privacy statement published on http://www.Regulations.gov. Comments, including any personal information
provided, are posted without changes or edits to http://www.Regulations.gov.

    Confidential Business Information: Confidential Business
Information (CBI) is commercial or financial information that is both
customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from
public disclosure. If your comments responsive to this notice contain
commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as
private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this notice, it is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI. Pursuant to 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 190.343, you may ask PHMSA to give confidential
treatment to information you give to the agency by taking the following
steps: (1) Mark each page of the original document submission
containing CBI as ``Confidential''; (2) send PHMSA, along with the
original document, a second copy of the original document with the CBI
deleted; and (3) explain why the information you are submitting is CBI.
Unless you are notified otherwise, PHMSA will treat such marked
submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed
in the public docket of this notice. Submissions containing CBI should
be sent to Kay McIver, DOT, PHMSA-PHP-80, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Any commentary PHMSA receives that is not
specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for
this matter.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    General: Ms. Kay McIver by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email
at [email protected].
    Technical: Mr. Steve Nanney by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PHMSA received a renewal request of a
special permit issued on September 1, 2016, to TGP, a subsidiary of
Kinder Morgan, Inc., seeking a waiver from the requirements of 49 CFR
192.611(a) and (d): Change in class location: Confirmation or revision
of maximum allowable operating pressure, 49 CFR 192.619(a): Maximum
allowable operating pressure: Steel or plastic pipelines, and 49 CFR
192.5(c): Class locations.
    The September 1, 2016, special permit was granted for 192 special
permit segments and approximately 49.00 miles of TGP natural gas
transmission pipeline system located in the states of Kentucky,
Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania,
Tennessee, Texas, and West Virginia. This special permit renewal is
being requested in lieu of pipe replacement, pressure reduction, or new
pressure tests for 162 gas transmission special permit segments
totaling 194,837.38 feet (approximately 36.901 miles). The 30 special
permit segments that are not included in this notice nor the below
table now meet the requirements of either 49 CFR 192.611(a) or
192.619(a) for a Class 3 location. The 162 renewal special permit
segments, which have changed from a Class 1 to Class 3 location, are as
follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Maximum allowable
Renewal  special permit  segment   County or parish,      Outside                                                                     operating pressure
               No.                       state           diameter               Line name             Length (feet)  Year installed   (pounds per square
                                                         (inches)                                                                        inch gauge)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1...............................  Madison, KY.......              24  100-1........................          526.27            1971                  750
2...............................  Madison, KY.......              24  100-1........................           12.70            1971                  750
3...............................  Madison, KY.......              24  100-1........................          168.34            1971                  750
4...............................  Bath, KY..........              26  100-2........................          606.60            1948                  750
6...............................  Bath, KY..........              26  100-2........................        1,515.30            1948                  750
7...............................  Bath, KY..........              26  100-2........................          344.20            1948                  750
8...............................  Rowan, KY.........              26  100-2........................          252.39            1948                  750
10..............................  Madison, KY.......              30  100-3........................          824.32            1950                  750
11..............................  Madison, KY.......              30  100-3........................          536.30            1950                  750
12..............................  Madison, KY.......              30  100-3........................          806.72            1950                  750
13..............................  Rowan, KY.........              26  100-3........................        1,054.07            1949                  750
14..............................  Rowan, KY.........              26  100-3........................          338.70            1949                  750
15..............................  Rowan, KY.........              26  100-3........................          912.96            1949                  750
17..............................  Boyd, KY..........              26  100-3........................          655.37            1950                  790
18..............................  Boyd, KY..........              26  100-3........................          494.40            1950                  790
19..............................  Madison, KY.......              30  100-4........................          521.39            1951                  750
20..............................  Madison, KY.......              30  100-4........................          607.56            1951                  750
21..............................  Madison, KY.......              36  800-2........................        1,690.82            1969                  936
23..............................  Sabine, LA........              24  100-1........................          598.40            1944                  750
24..............................  Natchitoches, LA..              24  100-1........................        1,118.30            1944                  750
27..............................  Sabine, LA........              30  100-2........................          272.20            1949                  750
28..............................  Natchitoches, LA..              31  100-2........................        1,121.16            1948                  604

29..............................  Ouachita, LA......              26  100-2........................          920.80            1947                  750
31..............................  Sabine, LA........              30  100-3........................          740.50            1951                  750
32..............................  Natchitoches, LA..              30  100-3........................        1,772.33            1951                  750
33..............................  Ouachita, LA......              30  100-3........................          907.80            1949                  750
34..............................  Ouachita, LA......              30  100-4........................        1,414.14            1951                  750
36..............................  Vermillion, LA....              24  500-1........................          872.70            1956                  973
37..............................  Vermillion, LA....              24  500-1........................        3,005.66            1956                  973
38..............................  IBERIA, LA........              24  500-1........................          858.45            1956                  973
41..............................  Franklin, LA......              30  800-1........................          102.57            1954                  936
42..............................  Franklin, LA......              30  800-1........................        1,259.31            1954                  936
43..............................  Franklin, LA......              30  800-1........................           75.63            1954                  936
44..............................  Washington, MS....              24  100-1........................          731.04            1944                  750
45..............................  Washington, MS....              24  100-1........................          964.23            1944                  750
46..............................  Washington, MS....              26  100-2........................          112.40            1948                  750
47..............................  Washington, MS....              26  100-2........................        2,073.94            1948                  750
48..............................  Benton, MS........              30  100-3........................        1,198.98            1949                  750
49..............................  Benton, MS........              30  100-4........................        1,234.46            1952                  750
50..............................  Hancock, MS.......              30  500-1........................        1,471.05            1959                  936
51..............................  Forrest, MS.......              30  500-1........................          482.40            1959                  936
52..............................  Forrest, MS.......              30  500-1........................        1,370.49            1959                  936
53..............................  Lauderdale, MS....              30  500-1........................        1,474.90            1959                  936
55..............................  Lauderdale, MS....              30  500-1........................          257.20            1959                  936
58..............................  Lowndes, MS.......              30  500-1........................          959.21            1959                  936
59..............................  Lowndes, MS.......              30  500-1........................        1,581.69            1959                  936
60..............................  Hancock, MS.......              36  500-2........................        1,488.68            1965                  936
61..............................  Forrest, MS.......              36  500-2........................        1,909.29            1966                  936
62..............................  Lauderdale, MS....              36  500-2........................        1,439.84            1966                  936
64..............................  Lowndes, MS.......              36  500-2........................        1,585.26            1964                  936
65..............................  Hancock, MS.......              36  500-3........................        1,347.37            1972                  936
66..............................  Sussex, NJ........              24  300-1........................        2,953.04            1955                 1170
67..............................  Sussex, NJ........              24  300-1........................          638.57            1955                 1170
68..............................  Sussex, NJ........              24  300-1........................          471.55            1955                 1170
69..............................  Sussex, NJ........              24  300-1........................        1,121.11            1955                 1170
70..............................  Sussex, NJ........              24  300-1........................          811.71            1955                 1170
71..............................  Sussex, NJ........              24  300-1........................          373.70            1955                 1170
72..............................  Sussex, NJ........              24  300-1........................        1,729.51            1955                 1170
75..............................  Ontario, NY.......              24  200-1........................          654.33            1951                  760
77..............................  Madison, KY.......              24  200-1........................        1,478.51            1951                  760
79..............................  Albany, NY........              24  200-1........................        1,153.88            1951                  760
80..............................  Albany, NY........              24  200-1........................        1,059.96            1951                  760
82..............................  Carroll, OH.......              26  200-1........................        2,658.16            1950                  790
83..............................  Columbiana, OH....              26  200-1........................        2,044.66            1950                  790
84..............................  Columbiana, OH....              26  200-1........................        1,270.10            1950                  790
85..............................  Columbiana, OH....              26  200-1........................        1,382.31            1950                  790
86..............................  ATHENS, OH........              26  200-2........................        1,513.05            1952                  790
88..............................  Carroll, OH.......              26  200-2........................        2,680.73            1952                  790
89..............................  Columbiana, OH....              26  200-2........................        1,296.36            1954                  790
90..............................  Carroll, OH.......              26  200-3........................        1,081.17            1956                  790
92..............................  Carroll, OH.......              26  200-3........................          974.20            1956                  790
94..............................  Carroll, OH.......              36  200-4........................        2,648.75            1963                  790
95..............................  Columbiana, OH....              36  200-4........................        1,950.62            1963                  790
96..............................  Columbiana, OH....              36  200-4........................        1,248.52            1963                  790
97..............................  Columbiana, OH....              36  200-4........................        1,358.28            1963                  790
98..............................  Lawrence, PA......              26  200-1........................        1,935.75            1950                  790
99..............................  Mercer, PA........              24  300-1........................          839.87            1953                  877
100.............................  Mercer, PA........              24  300-1........................          491.70            1953                  877
101.............................  Mercer, PA........              30  300-2........................          875.56            1965                  877
102.............................  Mercer, PA........              30  300-2........................          573.79            1965                  877
103.............................  Dickson, TN.......              24  100-1........................          533.33            1944                  750
104.............................  Cheatham, TN......              24  100-1........................        2,782.53            1944                  750
105.............................  Cheatham, TN......              24  100-1........................        1,490.60            1944                  750
106.............................  Cheatham, TN......              24  100-1........................           28.61            1944                  750
107.............................  Robertson, TN.....              24  100-1........................          668.38            1944                  750
108.............................  Robertson, TN.....              24  100-1........................        1,953.93            1944                  750
109.............................  Dickson, TN.......              26  100-2........................          554.05            1948                  750
110.............................  Dickson, TN.......              26  100-2........................          177.44            1948                  750
111.............................  Lewis, TN.........              30  500-1........................          566.83            1959                  936
112.............................  Lewis, TN.........              30  500-1........................          686.45            1959                  936
113.............................  Lewis, TN.........              30  500-1........................        1,376.94            1959                  936
114.............................  Cheatham, TN......              30  500-1........................          732.13            1959                  936
115.............................  Cheatham, TN......              30  500-1........................        1,006.00            1959                  936

116.............................  Cheatham, TN......              30  500-1........................          757.26            1959                  936
117.............................  Cheatham, TN......              30  500-1........................        1,332.21            1959                  936
118.............................  Cheatham, TN......              30  500-1........................          633.98            1959                  936
119.............................  Cheatham, TN......              30  500-1........................          994.45            1959                  936
120.............................  Cheatham, TN......              30  500-1........................            9.90            1959                  936
121.............................  Cheatham, TN......              30  500-1........................        1,339.84            1959                  936
122.............................  Robertson, TN.....              30  500-1........................        2,474.52            1959                  936
123.............................  Robertson, TN.....              30  500-1........................        4,358.19            1959                  936
124.............................  Robertson, TN.....              30  500-1........................        1,929.95            1959                  936
125.............................  Robertson, TN.....              30  500-1........................        3,262.84            1959                  936
126.............................  Lewis, TN.........              36  500-2........................          469.38            1964                  936
127.............................  Lewis, TN.........              36  500-2........................          738.42            1964                  936
128.............................  Cheatham, TN......              36  500-2........................        1,318.68            1968                  936
129.............................  Cheatham, TN......              36  500-2........................          381.21            1968                  936
130.............................  Cheatham, TN......              36  500-2........................          420.56            1968                  936
131.............................  Cheatham, TN......              36  500-2........................          502.70            1963                  936
132.............................  Cheatham, TN......              36  500-2........................           16.90            1963                  936
133.............................  Cheatham, TN......              36  500-2........................        2,062.21            1963                  936
134.............................  Robertson, TN.....              36  500-2........................        1,001.81            1965                  936
135.............................  Robertson, TN.....              36  500-2........................        1,426.43            1965                  936
136.............................  Robertson, TN.....              36  500-2........................          303.70            1965                  936
137.............................  Robertson, TN.....              36  500-2........................        3,257.08            1965                  936
138.............................  Robertson, TN.....              36  500-2........................        1,899.22            1965                  936
139.............................  Robertson, TN.....              36  500-2........................          219.10            1965                  936
140.............................  Robertson, TN.....              36  500-2........................        2,970.93            1965                  936
141.............................  Cheatham, TN......              30  800-1........................          384.62            1954                  936
142.............................  Cheatham, TN......              30  800-1........................          581.50            1954                  936
143.............................  Cheatham, TN......              30  800-1........................        1,104.30            1954                  936
144.............................  Cheatham, TN......              30  800-1........................        1,366.34            1954                  936
145.............................  Robertson, TN.....              30  800-1........................          968.97            1954                  936
146.............................  Robertson, TN.....              30  800-1........................        1,797.26            1954                  936
147.............................  Robertson, TN.....              30  800-1........................        4,253.00            1954                  936
148.............................  Robertson, TN.....              30  800-1........................        1,978.36            1954                  936
149.............................  Robertson, TN.....              30  800-1........................        3,133.48            1954                  936
151.............................  Waller, TX........              24  100-1........................        1,677.99            1944                  750
152.............................  Harris, TX........              24  100-1........................          753.70            1944                  750
153.............................  Sabine, TX........              24  100-1........................          675.00            1944                  750
154.............................  Sabine, TX........              24  100-1........................        1,539.30            1964                  750
155.............................  Sabine, TX........              24  100-1........................          573.40            1964                  750
156.............................  Waller, TX........              30  100-2........................        1,574.15            1948                  750
157.............................  Harris, TX........              30  100-2........................        1,220.90            1948                  750
158.............................  Harris, TX........              30  100-2........................        1,962.45            1948                  750
159.............................  Sabine, TX........              30  100-2........................        2,597.70            1949                  750
160.............................  Waller, TX........              30  100-3........................        1,531.99            1952                  750
161.............................  Waller, TX........              30  100-3........................        1,727.52            1952                  750
162.............................  Harris, TX........              30  100-3........................        1,024.50            1952                  750
163.............................  Harris, TX........              30  100-3........................          217.00            1952                  750
164.............................  Harris, TX........              30  100-3........................        1,733.65            1952                  750
165.............................  Harris, TX........              30  100-3........................        1,101.34            1952                  750
166.............................  Sabine, TX........              30  100-3........................        1,502.40            1964                  750
169.............................  Hidalgo, TX.......              24  409A-100 Donna Line..........        1,237.01            1950                  933
171.............................  Hidalgo, TX.......              24  409A-100 Donna Line..........        1,523.74            1950                  933
172.............................  Hidalgo, TX.......              24  409A-100 Donna Line..........        1,787.31            1950                  933
173.............................  Kanawha, WV.......              20  100-1........................        1,349.06            1984                  910
174.............................  Kanawha, WV.......              20  100-1........................        1,228.73            1984                  910
175.............................  Kanawha, WV.......              20  100-1........................          584.46            1984                  910
176.............................  Kanawha, WV.......              20  100-1........................        2,249.91            1984                  936
177.............................  Wayne, WV.........              24  100-2........................        2,657.51            1948                  973
178.............................  Putnam, WV........              24  100-2........................        1,833.55            1948                  938
181.............................  Cabell, WV........              26  100-3........................          438.10            1966                  910
182.............................  Putnam, WV........              30  100-3........................        1,415.75            1972                  910
183.............................  Putnam, WV........              30  100-3........................          891.20            1972                  910
185.............................  Harris, TX........              24  100-1........................        1,181.70            1944                  750
186.............................  Harris, TX........              24  100-1........................        1,351.66            1966                  750
187.............................  Kanawha, WV.......              24  100-2........................        1,233.70            1948                  910
188.............................  Cheatham, TN......              30  100-4........................          497.50            1952                  750
189.............................  Madison, KY.......              30  100-4........................        1,342.49            1951                  750
190.............................  Madison, KY.......              30  100-4........................          242.74            1951                  750
191.............................  Lauderdale, MS....              36  500-2........................          311.51            1963                  936
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The special permit renewal request, proposed special permit with
conditions, draft environmental assessment (DEA), and annual report
findings for pipeline integrity and reportable incidents for the above
listed TGP special permit segments are available for review and public
comments in Docket No. PHMSA-2016-0004. PHMSA invites interested
persons to review and submit comments on the special permit renewal
request and DEA in the docket. Please include any comments on potential
safety and environmental impacts that may result if the special permit
is granted. Comments may include relevant data.
    Before issuing a decision on the special permit renewal request,
PHMSA will evaluate all comments received on or before the comments
closing date. Comments received after the closing date will be
evaluated, if it is possible to do so without incurring additional
expense or delay. PHMSA will consider each relevant comment it receives
in making its decision to grant or deny this special permit request.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 16, 2022, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.97.
Alan K. Mayberry,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2022-11499 Filed 5-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


The background papers on the candidate national program priorities are intended to be thought pieces to initiate further discussion. When priorities are selected more detailed strategies with in depth background information, numerical targets, schedules, milestones and performance measures will be developed. ______________________________________________________________________________

November, 2003 1 Proposed Priority: Clean Air Act/ Air Toxics ( implementation of Maximum Achievable Control Technology ( MACT) Compliance and Enforcement Strategy)

Universe and Types of Facilities Sources of hazardous air pollutants ( HAPs) for which MACT Standards have been promulgated under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act ( CAA).

Geographic Range All Regions Environmental Risks MACT standards are promulgated under the CAA to regulate the most hazardous air pollutants and those posing the highest degree of risk to human health and the environment. By ensuring compliance with MACT standards, the Agency will reduce public exposure to toxic air emissions. Emphasis on MACT standards over several years can ensure that the requirements are clearly understood, guidance and compliance assistance tools ( e. g., permitting and enforcement guidance, inspector checklist and applicability flow charts) are developed for both regulatory agencies and the regulated community and targeted inspections and enforcement are carried out.

By 2004, EPA will have promulgated approximately 90 MACT standards. Since FY 2000, the Air Toxics program has been an OECA priority. The objective of the priority has been to distribute the substantial MACT implementation workload between headquarters and the regions through a Regional Adopt a MACT program. Through the program, the regions adopted MACT standards for which they developed compliance monitoring and compliance assistance tools. This program has resulted in the availability of a wide array of MACT implementation tools such as inspector check lists, applicability flowcharts and compliance timelines. Now that compliance dates are in place for more than 40 MACT Standards and implementation tools are available for the majority of these standards, the focus of the Air Toxics priority will shift from primarily a compliance assistance and tool development effort to compliance monitoring and enforcement. To facilitate this shift in focus, OECA has developed the MACT Compliance and Enforcement Strategy ( MACT Strategy). Implementation of the MACT Strategy will help EPA to establish compliance baselines, and develop and evaluate compliance trends for major MACT sources and source categories. The background papers on the candidate national program priorities are intended to be thought pieces to initiate further discussion. When priorities are selected more detailed strategies with in depth background information, numerical targets, schedules, milestones and performance measures will be developed. ______________________________________________________________________________

November, 2003 2 Noncompliance Information To achieve the maximum environmental benefit, EPA regional offices will primarily focus on major sources of hazardous air pollutants and specifically target larger sources with higher potential of environmental risk. As the EPA regional offices complete compliance evaluations, noncompliance information will be gathered and shared among the regional offices and with our state and local agency counterparts to facilitate compliance monitoring and enforcement.


March 13, 2008

BY EMAIL TRANSMISSION

Andrew Steckel (Air-4)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX

75 Hawthorne Street,

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Re:	ATTENTION DOCKET ID No. EPA-R09-OAR- 2007-1150; “Disapproval of
Plan of Nevada; Clean Air Mercury Rule; Extension of Comment Period,”
73 Fed. Reg. 3900 (Jan. 23, 2008)

Dear Mr. Steckel:

Environmental Defense Fund requests that the attached document be added
to record for the above referenced matter.  The document is a letter
from Environmental Protection Agency Region IX (EPA) to the Nevada
Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP), in response to NDEP’s
request for an open-ended extension of the comment period in light of
the decision from the D.C. Circuit court vacating the Clean Air Mercury
Rule (CAMR).  As we interpret EPA’s response, you have committed to
reopening the comment period in the event that CAMR is reinstated or
continues in effect, so that comments may be submitted before final
action is taken on this disapproval.  Although we have serious concerns
about the proposed disapproval of Nevada’s Mercury Plan, Environmental
Defense Fund will rely upon EPA’s assurance that should the D.C.
Circuit’s decision be overturned, we will have an opportunity to
submit comments at a later date before a final decision on the
disapproval is made.  We agree with your assessment contained the
attached letter that the proposed disapproval cannot proceed if the
court’s decision becomes final: “If the court's decision becomes
final and the mandate is issued, we would not be able to finalize action
on Nevada's CAMR State Plan.”  Letter from Andrew Steckel, EPA Region
IX to Michael Elges, NDEP (Mar. 7, 2008).

Please advise us if we have misinterpreted the import of the attached
letter so that we may submit comments addressing our concerns with the
proposed action on Nevada’s Mercury Plan.

Sincerely,

Kevin Lynch, J.D.

Staff Attorney

Environmental Defense Fund

(303) 447-7200

	Vickie Patton, J.D.

Deputy General Counsel

Environmental Defense Fund

(303) 447-7215

enc

 PAGE

 PAGE   1


[Federal Register: January 18, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 11)]
[Notices]
[Page 2930-2932]
[DOCID:fr18ja06-43]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0547; FRL-7757-1]

Notice of Filing of a Pesticide Petition for an Amendment
Establishing Tolerances for the Combined Residues of the Fungicide
Triflumizole in or on Filberts

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the initial filing of a pesticide
petition proposing to amend 40 CFR 180.476 by establishing tolerances
for the combined residues of the fungicide triflumizole and its
metabolites containing the 4-chloro-2-trifluoromethylaniline moiety in
or on the food commodity filberts.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 17, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0547 and pesticide petition number (PP)
3E6535, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the on-line

instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Mail: Public Information and Records Integrity Branch
(PIRIB) (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001.

     Hand Delivery: Public Information and Records Integrity
Branch (PIRIB) (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2, 1801
S. Bell St., Arlington, VA, Attention: Docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2005-0547. The docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the
docket facility is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2005-0547. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available on-line
at http://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov

or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access''

system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be captured automatically

and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit
the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/docket.htm/
.

     Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
http://www.regulation.gov index. Although listed in the index, some

information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Public Information and

Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB) (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal Mall
2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA. The docket facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the docket facility is (703) 305-
5805.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shaja Brothers Registration Division,
(7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; (703)
308-3194; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the

information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
     Identify the document by docket ID number and other
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and
page number).
     Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
     Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives
and substitute language for your requested changes.
     Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used.
     If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
     Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
     Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the
use of profanity or personal threats.
     Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.II. What Action is the Agency Taking?
    EPA is printing a summary of a pesticide petition received under
section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21
U.S.C. 346a, proposing the establishment or amendment of regulations in
40 CFR part 180 for residues of pesticide chemicals in or on various
food commodities. EPA has determined that this pesticide petition
contains data or information regarding the elements set forth in FFDCA
section 408(d)(2); however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency
of the submitted data at this time or whether the data support granting
of the pesticide petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA
rules on this pesticide petition.
    Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a summary of the petition included in
this notice, prepared by the petitioner along with a description of the
analytical method available for the detection and measurement of the
pesticide chemical residues is available on EPA's Electronic Docket at
http://www.regulations.gov/. To locate this information on the home

page of EPA's Electronic Docket, select ``Quick Search'' and type the
OPP docket ID number. Once the search has located the docket, clicking
on the

``Docket ID'' will bring up a list of all documents in the docket for
the pesticide including the petition summary.

Amendment to Existing Tolerance

    PP 3E6535. IR-4, 681 U.S. Highway 1 South, North
Brunswick, NJ 08902, proposes to amend 40 CFR 180.476 by establishing
tolerances for the combined residues of the fungicide triflumizole and
its metabolites containing the 4-chloro-2-trifluoromethylaniline moiety
in or on the food commodity filberts at 0.05 parts per million (ppm).
The analytical method is suitable for analyzing crops for residues of
triflumizole and its aniline containing metabolites at the proposed
tolerance levels. The analytical method has been independently
validated. Residue levels of triflumizole are converted to FA-1-1 by
acidic and alkaline reflux, followed by distillation. Residues are then
extracted and subjected to SPE purification. Detection and quantitation
are conducted by a gas chromatography equipped with nitrogen phosphorus
detector, electron capture detector or mass spectrometry detector. The
limit of quantitation of the method has been determined at 0.05 ppm for
the combined residues of triflumizole and FA-1-1 in filberts. The
enforcement methodology has been submitted to the Food and Drug
Administration for publication in the Pesticide Analytical Manual, Vol.
II (PAM II).

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives,
Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: January 6, 2006.
Daniel J. Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 06-384 Filed 1-17-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S