[Federal Register: September 7, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 172)]
[Notices]
[Page 54336-54337]
[DOCID:fr07se10-24]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2010-0350; FRL-9196-7; EPA ICR Number 2256.03; OMB Control
Number 2060-0598]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Area Sources: Acrylic
and Modacrylic Fibers Production, Carbon Black Production, Chemical
Manufacturing: Chromium Compounds, Flexible Polyurethane Foam
Production and Fabrication, Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing, and Wood
Preserving (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR which is abstracted below describes the
nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before October 7,
2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2010-0350 to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency,
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center, mail code
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2)
OMB at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Learia Williams, Compliance Assessment
and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail Code 2223A,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
(202) 564-0050; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On June 2, 2010 (75 FR 30813), EPA sought comments on this ICR
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any additional
comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days
of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OECA-2010-0350, which is available for public viewing
online at http://www.regulations.gov, in person viewing at the
Enforcement and Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The
EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number
for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents, whether submitted electronically or in paper will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, as EPA
receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about in the docket that are available
electronically. Once in the system, select ``docket search,'' then key
in the docket ID number identified above. Please note that EPA's policy
is that public comments the electronic docket, go to http://
www.regulations.gov.
    Title: NESHAP for Area Sources: Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers
Production, Carbon Black Production, Chemical Manufacturing: Chromium
Compounds, Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production and Fabrication, Lead
Acid Battery Manufacturing, and Wood Preserving (Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2256.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0598.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2010.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Area Sources: Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers
Production, Carbon Black Production, Chemical Manufacturing: Chromium
Compounds, Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production and Fabrication, Lead
Acid Battery Manufacturing, and Wood Preserving were proposed on April
4, 2007, and promulgated on July 16, 2007.
    Owners and operators of NESHAP for Area Sources: Acrylic and
Modacrylic Fibers Production, Carbon Black Production, Chemical
Manufacturing: Chromium Compounds, Flexible Polyurethane Foam
Production and Fabrication, Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing, and Wood
Preserving, must submit an initial notification of applicability, a
notification of compliance status, initial performance test, and
periodic reports and results. Owners and operators of an existing
affected source are also required to comply with the requirements of
any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected
facility. Semiannual reports are also required.
    Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of this part shall
maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least
five years following the date of such measurements, maintain reports
and records. Performance tests reports are required as this is the
Agency's record of a source's initial capability to comply with the
emission standard, and they serve as a record of the operating
conditions under which compliance was achieved.

    All reports are sent to the delegated State or local authority. In
the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are
sent directly to the EPA regional office. This information is being
collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart LLLLLL, 40
CFR part 63, subpart MMMMMM, 40 CFR part 63, subpart NNNNNN, 40 CFR
part 63, subpart OOOOOO, 40 CFR part 63, subpart PPPPPP, and 40 CFR
part 63, subpart QQQQQQ, as authorized in sections 112 and 114(a) of
the Clean Air Act. The required information consists of emissions data
and other information that have been determined to be private.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for EPA's
regulations are list in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15, and are
identified on the form and/or instrument, if applicable.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information are estimated to average 12
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining, information, and disclosing and providing information. All
existing ways will have to adjust to comply with any previously
applicable instructions and requirements that have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers
Production, Carbon Black Production, Chemical Manufacturing: Chromium
Compounds, Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production and Fabrication, Lead
Acid Battery Manufacturing, and Wood Preserving.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 319.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, semiannually, and occasionally.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 4,233.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $399,523, which includes $399,523 in
labor costs, no capital/startup costs, and no operation and maintenance
(O&M) costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease in the number of
affected facilities due to a more accurate accounting of existing
sources. This decrease is not due to any program changes.
    There is an increase in the estimated labor burden hours and cost
as currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved Burdens. The
increase is due to more accurate calculations, and the use of more
recent labor rates.

    Dated: August 26, 2010.
John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-22184 Filed 9-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 211 (Wednesday, October 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54740-54741]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23769]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CD19-1-000]

Notice of Preliminary Determination of a Qualifying Conduit
Hydropower Facility and Soliciting Comments and Motions To Intervene;
Haights Creek Irrigation Company

    On October 12, 2018, the Haights Creek Irrigation Company, filed a
notice of intent to construct a qualifying conduit hydropower facility,
pursuant to section 30 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), as amended by
section 4 of the Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 (HREA).
The proposed Haights Creek Micro-Hydropower Project would have a total
installed capacity up to 24 kilowatts (kW), and would be located on the
existing Haights Creek Irrigation Pipeline. The project would be
located near the City of Kaysville in Davis County, Utah.
    Applicant Contact: Dan Robinson, Haights Creek Irrigation Company,
820 East 200 North, Kaysville, UT 84037,

Phone No.<PHONE_NUMBER>, email: [email protected].
    FERC Contact: Robert Bell, Phone No.<PHONE_NUMBER>; Email:
[email protected].
    Qualifying Conduit Hydropower Facility Description: The proposed
project would consist of: (1) Up to six 4-kW turbine-generators
connected to an existing irrigation pipeline with a total generating
capacity of up to 24 kW, and (2) appurtenant facilities. The proposed
project would have an estimated annual generation of up to 105.42
megawatt-hours.
    A qualifying conduit hydropower facility is one that is determined
or deemed to meet all of the criteria shown in the table below.

                          Table 1--Criteria for Qualifying Conduit Hydropower Facility
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Satisfies
              Statutory provision                                   Description                         (Y/N)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FPA 30(a)(3)(A), as amended by HREA............  The conduit the facility uses is a tunnel, canal,            Y
                                                  pipeline, aqueduct, flume, ditch, or similar
                                                  manmade water conveyance that is operated for
                                                  the distribution of water for agricultural,
                                                  municipal, or industrial consumption and not
                                                  primarily for the generation of electricity.
FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(i), as amended by HREA.........  The facility is constructed, operated, or                    Y
                                                  maintained for the generation of electric power
                                                  and uses for such generation only the
                                                  hydroelectric potential of a non-federally owned
                                                  conduit.
FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(ii), as amended by HREA........  The facility has an installed capacity that does             Y
                                                  not exceed 5 megawatts.
FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(iii), as amended by HREA.......  On or before August 9, 2013, the facility is not             Y
                                                  licensed, or exempted from the licensing
                                                  requirements of Part I of the FPA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Preliminary Determination: The proposed Haights Creek Micro-
Hydropower Project will not interfere with the primary purpose of the
conduit, which is to transport water for irrigation by filling an
equalizing reservoir, which in turn provides pressure for an irrigation
zone in their service area. Therefore, based upon the above criteria,
Commission staff preliminarily determines that the proposal satisfies
the requirements for a qualifying conduit hydropower facility, which is
not required to be licensed or exempted from licensing.
    Comments and Motions to Intervene: Deadline for filing comments
contesting whether the facility meets the qualifying criteria is 45
days from the issuance date of this notice.
    Deadline for filing motions to intervene is 30 days from the
issuance date of this notice.
    Anyone may submit comments or a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR
385.210 and 385.214. Any motions to intervene must be received on or
before the specified deadline date for the particular proceeding.
    Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: All filings must (1)
bear in all capital letters the COMMENTS CONTESTING QUALIFICATION FOR A
CONDUIT HYDROPOWER FACILITY or MOTION TO INTERVENE, as applicable; (2)
state in the heading the name of the applicant and the project number
of the application to which the filing responds; (3) state the name,
address, and telephone number of the person filing; and (4) otherwise
comply with the requirements of sections 385.2001 through 385.2005 of
the Commission's regulations.\1\ All comments contesting Commission
staff's preliminary determination that the facility meets the
qualifying criteria must set forth their evidentiary basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 385.2001-2005 (2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
motions to intervene and comments using the Commission's eFiling system
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration,
using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the
end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at [email protected],<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free), or
(202) 502-8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper
copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. A copy of all other filings in
reference to this application must be accompanied by proof of service
on all persons listed in the service list prepared by the Commission in
this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.
    Locations of Notice of Intent: Copies of the notice of intent can
be obtained directly from the applicant or such copies can be viewed
and reproduced at the Commission in its Public Reference Room, Room 2A,
888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. The filing may also be
viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp using
the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number (i.e., CD19-1) in the docket
number field to access the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-
866-208-3676 or email [email protected]. For TTY, call (202)
502-8659.

    Dated: October 25, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-23769 Filed 10-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Erica Islas/R5/USEPA/US

11/16/2007 11:50 AM

To

Steve McFadden<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Subject

Re: Fw: Fwd: Figures from HRS Record(1)

Dear Mr. McFadden:

As a general rule, for figures used in HRS documentation records, EPA identifies on each figure the source of the base map and adds reference citations to support anything that was added to the base map.  If, a map/figure came out of a reference "as is" (such as in the case of a map pulled from a sampling report showing sample locations), there is  a citation on the figure to the appropriate reference.

In the case of East Troy, none of the figures came directly from the Shaw report.   Although the base maps may have originally come from the Shaw report, the actual figures used in the HRS documentation record were taken directly from different Ohio EPA references:

Figures 1 and 2 -- came from Reference 39, an Ohio EPA letter

Figure 3 -- came from Reference  9, the Ohio EPA ESI.

None of these figures were modified from the original figures in References 9 and 39, and the citation to the appropriate reference is cited on each figure.

References 7A, 10, 33, and 34 are modified figures. References 7A and 10 used Figure 3 of the Shaw report as a base figure which is Reference 7 of the HRS Documentation Record. References 33 and 34 used Figure 1 of the Shaw report.  These four references cited the source of their respective base figure.  In addition, the titles of these references are prominently displayed in the bottom right hand corner to support their specific modifications and thus, distinguishing the reference from its base figure.  References 7, 9, and 39 were provided to you on disk on 10/10/2007 via FedEx -2nd Day Air.

Should you have additional comments, instructions are provided at the following EPA website: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/pubcom.htm#docket .  In a letter. dated November 8, 2007, from Victoria van Roden, Chief, State, Tribal and Site Identification Branch, EPA to Howard Sharfstein, Senior Counsel, Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Ms. van Roden extended the comment period to December 10, 2007.

Erica Islas

Remedial Project Manager / Site Assessment Manager

Superfund Division

U.S. EPA - Region 5

77 W Jackson Blvd  |  Mail Code: SR-6J

Chicago, IL 60604

Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>  |  Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

Steve McFadden<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 11/14/2007 10:30 AM

Please respond to

Steve McFadden<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

To

Erica Islas/R5/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Subject

Fw: Fwd: Figures from HRS Record

Randy Watterworth at OEPA forwarded your email to me regarding these four figures in the HRS Documentation Record for the East Troy Contaminated Aquifer Site (Troy, OH).  First, let me apologize for the confusion.  Janet Pfundheller sent me copies of the maps and I have some questions about them, but USEPA's contractor at Weston told me that the maps originated with OEPA, so I started there.

My question is the maps are based on figures from the Shaw report dated October 2006, but they have been modified.  There is nothing on the maps that identifies who made the changes, but because they have been changed it is not accurate to reference them as being from the Shaw report.  I have questions about the actual changes, but my immediate question is that these maps appear to be taken from a larger document (note that the figure numbers, Figure 2, Figure 5 and Figure 6, are not the original figure numbers in the Shaw report).  Can you identify for me what that document is and would it be possible for me to get a copy of it?

Thank you for your help.  If you need to contact me, you can use this email address or my phone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Steve

-----Forwarded Message-----

>From: Randy Watterworth<EMAIL_ADDRESS> >Sent: Nov 14, 2007 8:03 AM

>To: Steve McFadden<EMAIL_ADDRESS> >Cc: Cindy Jernigan<EMAIL_ADDRESS> >Subject: Fwd: Figures from HRS Record

>

>Steve:

>

>This came from U.S. EPA Region 5 regarding the mystery HRS figures.  They are not from Ohio EPA.

>

>Jon R. Watterworth

>Senior Site Coordinator

>Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

>Division of Emergency and Remedial Response

>401 East Fifth Street

>Dayton, Ohio  45402-2911

>(937) 285-6062 (direct)

>(937) 285-6404 (fax)

<EMAIL_ADDRESS> >

>

>>>><EMAIL_ADDRESS>11/13/2007 6:22 PM >>>

>

>Randy,

>

>The source for all 4 figures came from Reference 7 of the HRS

>Documentation Record, the Shaw Environmental report from October 2006

>

>Per your request:

>

>Figure 2 - (known as Ref 7A in the HRS Doc Rec) came from Page 100 of

>Reference 7.

>'Unlabeled' - (known as Ref 10) came from Page 100

>Figure 5 - (known as Ref 33) came from Page 98

>Figure 6 - (known as Ref 34) came from Page 98

>

>Let me know if you need anything else.

>

>

>Erica Islas

>Remedial Project Manager / Site Assessment Manager

>Superfund Division

>U.S. EPA - Region 5

>

>77 W Jackson Blvd  |  Mail Code: SR-6J

>Chicago, IL 60604

>Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>  |  Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

>

>


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 154 (Friday, August 13, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44670-44671]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17108]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0633; Airspace Docket No. 21-ANM-22]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Modification and Establishment of Class E airspace;
Frank Wiley Field Airport, MT

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E airspace, designated
as an extension to a Class D or Class E surface area, at Frank Wiley
Field Airport, Miles City, MT. This action also proposes to remove the
Class E airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface.
Additionally, the action proposes an administrative update to the Class
E2 and E5 text headers. This action would ensure the safety and
management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 27, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone:
1-800-647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2021-0633; Airspace Docket No. 21-ANM-22, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11E at NARA, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Van Der Wal, Federal Aviation
Administration, Western Service Center, Operations Support Group, 2200
S. 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority,
as it would establish and modify Class E airspace at Frank Wiley Field
Airport, Miles City, MT, to support IFR operations at the airport.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Persons wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2021-0633;
Airspace Docket No. 21-ANM-22''. The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 2200 S. 216th Street, Des Moines, WA
98198.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and effective
September 15, 2020. FAA Order 7400.11E is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 by establishing
Class E airspace, designated as an extension to a Class D or Class E
surface area, at Frank Wiley Field Airport, Miles City, MT. The FAA
proposes to amend the VOR RWY 4 approach and the amendment will
relocate the point where aircraft descend below 1,000 feet above the
surface from ``3.35 miles'' to ``10.8 miles southwest of the airport.''
The additional Class E airspace will ensure the containment of IFR
aircraft flying the approach.
    This action also proposes to remove the Class E airspace extending
upward from 1,200 feet above the surface. This airspace area is wholly
contained with the Glasgow en route airspace and duplication is not
necessary.
    Additionally, the action proposes an administrative update to the
Class E2 and E5 text headers. The city name should not appear in the
second line of the text header, and the term ``Airport'' should be
added. This line of text should be changed from ``Miles City, Frank
Wiley Field, MT'' to ``Frank Wiley Field Airport, MT''.
    Class E2, E4, and E5 airspace designations are published in
paragraphs 6002, 6004, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.11E,
dated July 21, 2020, and effective September 15, 2020, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designation listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial, and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11E,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and
effective September 15, 2020, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as a Surface Area.

* * * * *

ANM MT E2 Miles City, MT [Amended]

Frank Wiley Field Airport, MT
    (Lat. 46[deg]25'41'' N., long. 105[deg]53'10'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within a 5-mile
radius of the airport.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to
a Class D or Class E Surface Area.

* * * * *

ANM MT E4 Miles City, MT [New]

Frank Wiley Field Airport, MT
    (Lat. 46[deg]25'41'' N., long. 105[deg]53'10'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 2.4 miles
each side of the 225[deg] bearing from the airport extending from
the Class E2's 5-mile radius of the airport to 10.8 miles southwest
of the airport.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ANM MT E5 Miles City, MT [Amended]

Frank Wiley Field Airport, MT
    (Lat. 46[deg]25'41'' N., long. 105[deg]53'10'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within an 8-mile radius of the airport.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on August 5, 2021.
B. G. Chew,
Acting Group Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2021-17108 Filed 8-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 30, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 211)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 64576]
[DOCID:fr30oc08-21]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2008-0746; FRL-8735-8]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
West Virginia; Revised Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets for the
Parkersburg 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of West Virginia for the purpose of
amending the 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the Parkersburg area.
This revision amends the maintenance plans' 2009 and 2018 motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) by reallocating a portion of the plans'
safety margins which results in an increase in the MVEBs. In the Final
Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's
SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no
adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in
the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response
to this action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment
period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do
so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received in writing by December 1, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2008-0746 by one of the following methods:
    A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    B. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2008-0746, Carol Febbo, Chief, Energy,
Radiation and Indoor Environment Branch, Mailcode 3AP23, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
    D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2008-0746. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal
are available at the West Virginia Department of Environmental
Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601 57th Street, SE., Charleston,
West Virginia 25304.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan Goold,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by e-
mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For further information, please see the
information provided in the direct final rule, with the same title,
that is located in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this
Federal Register publication.

    Dated: October 20, 2008.
Donald S. Welsh,
 Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. E8-25660 Filed 10-29-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P