[Federal Register: August 3, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 148)]
[Notices]
[Page 45620-45623]
[DOCID:fr03au10-61]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 2

July 26, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER10-1901-001.
    Applicants: Upper Peninsula Power Company.
    Description: Upper Peninsula Power Company submits tariff filing
per 35: Joint Tariff For Sales of Ancillary Services, Volume No. 2 to
be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5088.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1908-000.
    Applicants: Duquesne Conemaugh, LLC.
    Description: Duquesne Conemaugh, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Duquesne Conemaugh, LLC Market Rate Tariff Volume No. 1 to be
effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5000.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1909-000.
    Applicants: Duquesne Keystone, LLC.
    Description: Duquesne Keystone, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Duquesne Keystone, LLC Market Rate Tariff Volume No. 1 to be
effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5001.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1910-000.
    Applicants: Duquesne Light Company.
    Description: Duquesne Light Company submits tariff filing per
35.12: Market Rate Tariff, Volume No. 3, to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5002.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1911-000.
    Applicants: Duquesne Power, LLC.
    Description: Duquesne Power, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Duquesne Power, LLC Rate Schedule FERC No. 1 to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5003.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1912-000.
    Applicants: Stand Energy Corporation.
    Description: Stand Energy Corporation submits tariff filing per
35.12: Stand Energy Corporation FERC Electric Rate Schedule No. 1 to be
effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5004.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1915-000.
    Applicants: Bayswater Peaking Facility, LLC.
    Description: Bayswater Peaking Facility, LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Bayswater Baseline Filing to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5029.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1916-000.
    Applicants: Florida Power Corporation.
    Description: Florida Power Corporation Notice of Cancellation of
Service Agreement with Winter Park, Florida.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5050.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1917-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
    Description: Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. submits tariff
filing per 35.12: Baseline to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5086.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1918-000.
    Applicants: FPL Energy North Dakota Wind II, LLC.
    Description: FPL Energy North Dakota Wind II, LLC submits tariff
filing per 35.12: North Dakota II Baseline Filing to be effective 7/23/
2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5092.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1919-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits notice of the
cancellation of a wholesale market participation agreement with Vision
Power Systems, Inc, designated as Original Service Agreement 2008.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-0209.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1920-000.
    Applicants: FPL Energy Oklahoma Wind, LLC.
    Description: FPL Energy Oklahoma Wind, LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Oklahoma Baseline Filing to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5096.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1921-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits an executed Wholesale
Market Participation Agreement with Sustainable Energy Holdings, LLC
and Pennsylvania Electric Company.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-0208.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1922-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp submits Notice of Termination for Service
Agreement 379 under Seventh Revised Volume 11 Open Access Transmission
Tariff, Long-Term Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service Agreement.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-0207.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1923-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp submits its Transmission System
Interconnection Agreement dated 6/21/10 with Western Area Power
Administration, Department of Energy designated as Rate Schedule FERC
No 660.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-0206.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1924-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Public Service Corporation.
    Description: Wisconsin Public Service Corporation submits tariff
filing per 35.12: Rate Schedule No. 87 to be effective 10/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5106.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1925-000.
    Applicants: FPL Energy Oliver Wind I, LLC.
    Description: FPL Energy Oliver Wind I, LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Oliver I Baseline Filing to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1926-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.
    Description: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC submits a Network
Integration Transmission Service Agreement with the City of Seneca,
South Carolina.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-0205.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1927-000.
    Applicants: FPL Energy Oliver Wind II, LLC.
    Description: FPL Energy Oliver Wind II, LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Oliver II Baseline Filing to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5110.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1928-000.
    Applicants: FPL Energy Sooner Wind, LLC.
    Description: FPL Energy Sooner Wind, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Sooner Baseline Filing to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5111.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1929-000.
    Applicants: FPL Energy South Dakota Wind, LLC.
    Description: FPL Energy South Dakota Wind, LLC submits tariff
filing per 35.12: South Dakota Baseline Filing, to be effective 7/23/
2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5113.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1930-000.
    Applicants: FPL Energy Stateline II, Inc.
    Description: FPL Energy Stateline II, Inc. submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Stateline II Baseline Filing to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5117.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1931-000.
    Applicants: FPL Energy Vansycle, L.L.C.
    Description: FPL Energy Vansycle, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
35.12: Vansycle Baseline Filing to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5126.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1932-000.
    Applicants: FPL Energy Wyman, LLC.
    Description: FPL Energy Wyman, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Wyman Baseline Filing, to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5128.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1933-000.
    Applicants: RockGen Energy, LLC.
    Description: RockGen Energy, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Market-Based Rate Tariff in Compliance with Order No. 714 to be
effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5135.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1934-000.
    Applicants: CES Marketing IX, LLC.
    Description: CES Marketing IX, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Market-Based Rate Tariff in Compliance with Order No. 714 to be
effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5136.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1935-000.
    Applicants: FPL Energy Wyman IV, LLC.
    Description: FPL Energy Wyman IV, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Wyman IV Baseline Filing to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5137.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1936-000.
    Applicants: Carville Energy LLC.
    Description: Carville Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Market-Based Rate Tariff in Compliance with Order No. 714 to be
effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5140.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1937-000.
    Applicants: Calpine Power--OR, LLC.
    Description: Calpine Power America--OR, LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Market-Based Rate Tariff in Compliance with Order No. 714 to
be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5144.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1938-000.
    Applicants: Calpine Power America--CA, LLC.
    Description: Calpine Power America--CA, LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Market-Based Rate Tariff in Compliance with Order No. 714 to
be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5147.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1939-000.
    Applicants: PPL Electric Utilities Corporation.
    Description: PPL Electric Utilities Corp submits a revised
Interconnection Agreement with Metropolitan Edison Co.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-0215.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1940-000.
    Applicants: Calpine Oneta Power, L.P.
    Description: Calpine Oneta Power, L.P. submits tariff filing per
35.12: Market-Based Rate Tariff in Compliance with Order No. 714 to be
effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5148.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1941-000.
    Applicants: Calpine Gilroy Cogen, L.P.
    Description: Calpine Gilroy Cogen, L.P. submits tariff filing per
35.12: Market-Based Rate Tariff in Compliance with Order No. 714 to be
effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5149.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1942-000.
    Applicants: Calpine Construction Finance Co., L.P.
    Description: Calpine Construction Finance Co., L.P. submits tariff
filing per 35.12: Market-Based Rate Tariff in Compliance with Order No.
714 to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5150.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1943-000.
    Applicants: Blue Spruce Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: Blue Spruce Energy Center, LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Market-Based Rate Tariff in Compliance with Order No. 714 to
be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5152.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1944-000.
    Applicants: Bethpage Energy Center 3, LLC.

    Description: Bethpage Energy Center 3, LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Market-Based Rate Tariff in Compliance with Order No. 714 to
be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5158.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1945-000.
    Applicants: Auburndale Peaker Energy Center, L.L.C.
    Description: Auburndale Peaker Energy Center, L.L.C. submits tariff
filing per 35.12: Market-Based Rate Tariff in Compliance with Order No.
714 to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5162.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1946-000.
    Applicants: Broad River Energy LLC.
    Description: Broad River Energy LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Market-Based Rate Tariff in Compliance with Order No. 714 to be
effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5163.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1947-000.
    Applicants: Otay Mesa Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: Otay Mesa Energy Center, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Market-Based Rate Tariff in Compliance with Order No. 714 to be
effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5164.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1948-000.
    Applicants: FPL Energy Wyoming, LLC.
    Description: FPL Energy Wyoming, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Wyoming Baseline Filing to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5166.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1949-000.
    Applicants: FPLE Rhode Island State Energy, L.P.
    Description: FPLE Rhode Island State Energy, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 35.12: FPLE RI Baseline Filing to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5167.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1950-000.
    Applicants: Garden Wind, LLC.
    Description: Garden Wind, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Garden Baseline Filing to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5172.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1951-000.
    Applicants: Gexa Energy L.L.C.
    Description: Gexa Energy L.L.C. submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Gexa Baseline Filing, to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5179.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1952-000.
    Applicants: Gray County Wind Energy, LLC.
    Description: Gray County Wind Energy, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Gray County Baseline Filing to be effective 7/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5182.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1953-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
submits tariff filing per 35: 2010-07-23 Transmission Constraints
Filing, to be effective 7/13/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100723-5185.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1955-000.
    Applicants: Consolidated Edison Company of New York,
    Description: Errata filing of Consolidated Edison Company of New
York, Inc.
    Filed Date: 07/26/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100726-5168.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 16, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1956-000.
    Applicants: New York State Electric & Gas Corporation.
    Description: New York State Electric & Gas Corporation submits an
executed version of the Original Service Agreement 1601 between NYSEG
and Standard under the NYISO Open Access Transmission Agreement etc.
    Filed Date: 07/26/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100726-0206.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 16, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1958-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits tariff
filing per 35: LGIA--Alta Wind CPC East & West--Compliance--072610 to
be effective 6/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/26/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100726-5108.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 16, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1959-000.
    Applicants: Lower Mount Bethel Energy, LLC
    Description: Lower Mount Bethel Energy, LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Lower Mount Bethel Energy, LLC Baseline Filing to be
effective 7/26/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/26/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100726-5125.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 16, 2010.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the

Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive
e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed
dockets(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-18981 Filed 8-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


From:
Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Monday, October 19, 2020 1:37 PM
To:
Allen Dittenhoefer<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Charles Jones<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc:
Don Wiggins<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
Re: Bluestone Coke: Whole industry QA review of Coke data and calculations

Mr. Dittenhoefer-Good news. It was my error that I thought we did not have PAH data for quench towers. There was an error in the ICR summary tables and semi-vol was left off and not listed along with TSO for quench towers. So we will use the PAH data for quench towers for risk modeling. The purpose of including TSO in the coke ICR, with the specific HAP tests done at same time as TSO, was so that, if needed for any future standards, we could use TSO as a compliance method because its a simpler method. With concurrent test data we would be able to establish a correlation between the HAP modeled in risk assessment and TSO data.

So we will NOT be using TSO in the risk assessment, but may use the TSO data if emissions standards need to be set. Due to the difficulty in testing anything in the quench towers, we could consider a work practice standard if standards need to be set. Hence, the other simultaneous nonair tests that were required during quench tower tests.

Sorry for the confusion.

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

Pronouns - She/Her/Hers
Salutation - Dr./Ms.

From: Allen Dittenhoefer<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 1:30 PM
To: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Charles Jones<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: Don Wiggins<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: RE: Bluestone Coke: Whole industry QA review of Coke data and calculations

Dr. Jones,

Thank you for your email of October 8, 2020, in which you responded to the comments we provided on the EPA Whole Industry Test Data Spreadsheet and the Estimates and Assumptions document.  Below I provide, on behalf of Bluestone Coke, further comments regarding your response to items #3 contained in your email.

Item #3: Toluene Soluble Organic (TSO) and Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter (MCEM) Emissions not Applicable to Risk Assessment
You stated in your response to Item #3 regarding TSO and MCEM emissions that EPA will model the measured emissions of TSO/MCEM as benzene and not as Coke Oven Emissions (COE).  You later stated in your response that EPA will model the "individual constituents" of COE.  It is not clear from your response what you mean by "individual constituents."

We agree that TSO/MCEM emissions should not be modeled using the Unit Risk Estimate (URE) of COE.  However, TSO/MCEM emissions should be modeled using the cumulative risk from the PAH constituents of COE, not as benzene emissions.  Benzene is a volatile organic compound, for which ICR testing using SW-846 Method 0031 for speciated volatile organic HAPs was conducted.  COE, on the other hand, is comprised mainly of PAHs, which are semi-volatile organic compounds that exist in vaporous form at the high temperatures inside the coke ovens and condense into particulate matter (PM) upon release to the cooler atmosphere.  The test method for TSO and MCEM (Method 315) basically uses a Method 5 sampling train designed to capture filterable and condensable PM, followed by extraction of organic material using a solvent (i.e., toluene or methylene chloride).  Accordingly, it would not be appropriate to model TSO/MCEM (PM emissions) as benzene (a volatile organic compound).  Because the PQBS risk assessment will also include the predicted risk from benzene emissions using Method 0031-derived test data, modeling of TSO/MCEM emissions as benzene would also improperly double-count benzene.

The modeling of the cumulative risk from the constituents of COE (i.e., PAH compounds) in place of COE emissions from control devices, such as pushing baghouses and quench towers, and combustion units such as battery stacks and boilers, is consistent with the approach EPA used in the MACT I (Subpart L) coke industry residual risk assessment (U.S. EPA, Risk Assessment Document for the Coke Oven MACT Residual Risk, December 22, 2003).  EPA stated that this is because the control device or combustion process alters the composition of the COE emission stream, such that the stream can no longer be identified as COE (e.g., see pp. 8 and 15).  On page 6 of this document, EPA stated that "benzene soluble organics (BSO) comprise the semi-volatile organic constituents of coke oven emissions that are soluble in benzene.  While some constituents are not benzene-soluble, BSO is considered an appropriate surrogate for quantifying coke oven emissions."

In addition, we note that the URE for COE was derived from epidemiologic data for coke oven workers exposed to raw COG emissions at the battery tops and sides (i.e., coke battery charging, door and topside leaks, and fugitive pushing emissions), and not from exposure to emissions from battery and boiler stacks, nor from pushing control devices and quench towers.

In summary, the cancer risk assessment for emissions from battery stacks, pushing control devices, quench towers, and boilers should be modeled using the cumulative risk from the PAH constituents of COE, using the ICR PAH test database, and not as COE or benzene.

Thank you for your consideration.

Allen C. Dittenhoefer, Ph.D.
Principal

Environmental Planning Specialists, Inc.
45 U.S. Highway 46 East
Suite 601
Pine Brook, NJ 07058
Direct:<PHONE_NUMBER> (Ext. 12705)
Mobile<PHONE_NUMBER>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>www.envplanning.com


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 114 (Thursday, June 13, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27671-27672]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12453]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-86068; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2019-009]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1,
To Adopt Rule 21.21 (Solicitation Auction Mechanism)

June 7, 2019.
    On February 21, 2019, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule
change to adopt Rule 21.21, the Solicitation Auction Mechanism, a
solicited order mechanism for larger-sized orders. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on March 12,
2019.\3\ On April 23, 2019, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.\4\ On April 26, 2019, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,\5\ the Commission designated a longer period
within which to approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\6\ The Commission
received no comments on the proposal. On June 7, 2019, the Exchange
withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-CboeEDGX-2019-009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85253 (March 6,
2019), 84 FR 8921.
    \4\ Amendment No. 1 revised the proposal to (1) correct minor
technical errors in the description of the proposed rule change; (2)
remove an inadvertent description of an amendment to Exchange Rule
22.12, which the Exchange does not propose to amend in the proposal;
and (3) update the Exchange's description of the proposed rule
change's consistency with Section 11(a) of the Act. Amendment No. 1
is available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboeedgx-2019-009/srcboeedgx2019009-5405908-184490.pdf.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85734, 84 FR 18907
(May 2, 2019). The Commission designated June 10, 2019 as the date
by which the Commission shall approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove, the
proposed rule change.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-12453 Filed 6-12-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2379-2381]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00555]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-96611; File No. SR-IEX-2022-10]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Order
Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify IEX Rule
11.190(b)(7) To Adopt an Optional Cancel or Re-Price Functionality for
D-Limit Orders

January 9, 2023.

I. Introduction

    On November 4, 2022, the Investors Exchange LLC (``IEX'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to allow Users \3\ of
Discretionary Limit orders (``D-Limit orders'') to opt for their D-
Limit orders to either automatically cancel or re-price--under certain
conditions--after after an initial price adjustment. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on November
25, 2022.\4\ The Commission received no comments on the proposed rule
change. This order approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See IEX Rule 1.160(qq) (defining ``User''). Users include
both Members and Sponsored Participants. See IEX Rule 1.160(ll)
(defining ``Sponsored Participant'').
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 96352 (November 18,
2022), 87 FR 72523 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange seeks to amend IEX Rule 11.190(b)(7) to allow a User
to attach an optional instruction to a D-Limit order so that the order
will either re-price or cancel following an initial price adjustment
during a period of quote instability \5\ under certain circumstances.
Specifically, the D-Limit order would either reprice or cancel if,
after the most recent quote instability determination \6\ that resulted
in the D-Limit order being price adjusted, ten (10) milliseconds have
passed and the order is resting at a price that is less aggressive than
the NBB \7\ for buy orders or less aggressive than the NBO \8\ for sell
orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See infra notes 10-14 and accompanying text.
    \6\ Id.
    \7\ See IEX Rule 1.160(u).
    \8\ See IEX Rule 1.160(u).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Current D-Limit Functionality

    D-Limit orders are limit orders that may be either displayed or
non-displayed and are initially priced and ranked in the Exchange's
Order Book at the order's limit price.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See IEX Rule 1.160(p).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    When a D-Limit order is resting on the Exchange's Order Book, it
will reprice automatically when the Exchange's Crumbling Quote
Indicator (``CQI'') is triggered (i.e., during a period of relative
quote instability).\10\ The CQI that applies to D-Limit orders is
governed by IEX Rule 11.190(g)(1), under which the Exchange utilizes
quoting activity of eight away exchanges' Protected Quotations \11\ and
a mathematical calculation to assess the probability of an imminent
change to the current Protected NBB \12\ to a lower price or imminent
change to the current Protected NBO \13\ to a higher price for a

particular security. When the quoting activity meets predetermined
criteria, the System treats the quote as not stable (``quote
instability'' or a ``crumbling quote'') and the CQI is then ``on'' at
that price level for two milliseconds. During all other times, the
quote is considered stable and the CQI is ``off''. The System
independently assesses the stability of the Protected NBB and Protected
NBO for each security.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See IEX Rule 11.190(g) (describing crumbling quotes and
quote instability).
    \11\ See IEX Rule 1.160(bb) (defining ``Protected Quotation'' as
an automated quotation that is calculated by IEX to be the best bid
or best offer of an exchange).
    \12\ See IEX Rule 1.160(cc).
    \13\ See id.
    \14\ After this proposal was filed and published for comment,
the Commission approved IEX Rule 11.190(g)(2), which provides a new
alternative calculation for determining when there is quote
instability and therefore, when the CQI is triggered. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 96416 (December 1, 2022), 87 FR 75099
(December 7, 2022). However, the alternative calculation under Rule
11.190(g)(2) may not be applied to D-Limit orders, so D-Limit orders
only price adjust when there is quote instability pursuant to IEX
Rule 11.190(g)(1). Thus, these recent changes to Rule 11.190(g) do
not affect the present proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After the CQI is triggered, all D-Limit orders--both resting and
those being entered at the time of quote instability--are adjusted to a
less-aggressive price and will subsequently rest on the Exchange's
Order Book at that new price. Specifically, if the System receives a D-
Limit buy (sell) order during a period of quote instability, and the D-
Limit order has a limit price equal to or higher (lower) than the quote
instability determination price level (``CQI Price''), the price of the
order will be automatically adjusted by the System to one (1) minimum
price variation (``MPV'') \15\ lower (higher) than the CQI Price.\16\
Similarly, when unexecuted shares of a D-Limit buy (sell) order are
posted to the Order Book, if the CQI turns on and such shares are
ranked (and displayed in the case of a displayed order) by the System
at a price equal to or higher (lower) than the CQI Price, the price of
the order will be automatically adjusted to a price one MPV lower
(higher) than the quote instability price level.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See IEX Rule 11.210.
    \16\ See IEX Rule 11.190(b)(7)(A) and (B).
    \17\ See IEX Rule 11.190(b)(7)(C) and (D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A D-Limit order that has been subject to an automatic price
adjustment will not revert to the price at which it was previously
ranked (and, if applicable, displayed). Further, whenever the price of
a D-Limit order is adjusted, the order will receive a new time
priority, and the User that entered the order will receive an order
restatement message from the Exchange.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ If multiple D-Limit orders are adjusted at the same time,
their relative time priority is maintained.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposal

    The Exchange proposes to provide Users with an option to either
reprice or cancel a price-adjusted D-Limit order under certain
circumstances by attaching an instruction to their D-Limit orders
pursuant to new IEX Rule 11.190(b)(7)(E).\19\ If a D-Limit order that
is entered with this optional instruction is then subject to an
automatic price adjustment pursuant to IEX Rule 11.190(b)(7) and is
resting at a price that is less aggressive than the NBBO ten (10)
milliseconds after the most recent quote instability determination that
resulted in the order being price adjusted, the order will either be
canceled (if the User selected the cancel instruction) or re-priced to
the less aggressive of the order's limit price or the NBB (for a buy
order) or NBO (for a sell order) (if the User selected the re-price
instruction).\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ The Exchange also proposes to reorganize IEX Rule 11.190(b)
so that the text in current IEX Rule 11.190(b)(7)(E) will become
Rule 11.190(7)(F). Additionally, the Exchange proposes to add a
reference to new IEX Rule 11.190(b)(7)(E) into paragraph (F).
    \20\ Additionally, displayed D-Limit orders that re-price to the
NBB (for a buy order) or the NBO (for a sell order) will be subject
to IEX's Display-Price Sliding rule (IEX Rule 11.190(b)(h)(1)) and
will be displayed at the ``most aggressive permissible price''
without locking or crossing a Protected Quotation (IEX Rule
1.160(bb) of an away market, which means they will be priced one MPV
less aggressive than the locking (IEX Rule 11.190(b)(h)(3)(A)(ii))
or crossing (IEX Rule 11.190(b)(h)(3)(B)(ii)) price. Non-displayed
D-Limit orders that re-price to the NBB (for a buy order) or the NBO
(or a sell order) will be subject to IEX's Non-Displayed Price
Sliding rule, which means they will be able to post at the locking
or crossing price. See IEX Rule 11.190(b)(h)(2). In the Notice, the
Exchange provides examples to demonstrate how the new cancel or re-
price instruction would operate. See Notice, supra note 4, at 72525.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the Exchange's
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Exchange Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.\21\ In particular, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with Sections 6(b)(5) \22\ and
6(b)(8) \23\ of the Exchange Act. Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act
requires that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed,
among other things, to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest, and not be designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. Section
6(b)(8) of the Exchange Act requires that the rules of a national
securities exchange not impose any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange
Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its proposal, IEX represents that some Users of D-Limit orders
have informed IEX that they ``cannot readily configure their trading
systems to receive, process, and respond to the restatement messages
IEX transmits to [Users] after each price adjustment.'' \24\ IEX states
that these Users ``are unable to track whether their D-Limit orders
have been re-priced, and if so, the price at which they are currently
resting.'' \25\ As such, ``[w]ithout this information, IEX understands
that such [Users] are hindered in their ability to timely cancel or
adjust the prices of their resting D-Limit orders to meet their trading
objectives.'' \26\ IEX says that to address this issue, some Users have
requested that IEX provide optional order type functionality to allow a
D-Limit order that has been subject to an automatic price adjustment to
be automatically either canceled or re-priced.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ Notice, supra note 4, at 72524. IEX also states that these
Users note that their trading systems are not currently configured
to ingest the D-Limit restatement messages (and, in some cases,
other restatement messages), and they would have to devote
significant resources to build the logic in order to ingest, and
respond to, the messages for this one order type. See id.
    \25\ Id.
    \26\ Id.
    \27\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    IEX asserts that the proposed 10 millisecond delay after which a
re-priced D-Limit order could either cancel or re-price to a more
aggressive price, as described above, will not provide any speed
advantages to Users that elect to use the order type's new optional
cancel or re-price functionality when compared to Users who cancel or
re-price a price-adjusted D-Limit themselves.\28\ Specifically, IEX
notes that all orders are subject to the Exchange's existing latency
for all orders, which are 37 and 350 microseconds for outbound and
inbound messages, respectively.\29\ The Exchange explains that this
aggregate 387 microseconds of latency for a ``round trip'' that would
be required for a User to respond to a D-Limit price adjustment is more
than 9 milliseconds less than the proposed 10 millisecond time after
which the proposed order type's new instruction will result in the
System canceling or re-pricing a D-Limit

order that was automatically adjusted.\30\ IEX represents that this
``timing differential is designed to ensure that orders canceled or re-
priced by IEX have no advantage over orders canceled or repriced by a
User that processed the restatement message'' because ``the Exchange
would cancel or re-price orders more slowly than orders canceled or re-
priced by a User.'' \31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See Notice, supra note 4, at 72524.
    \29\ See id.
    \30\ See id.
    \31\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission previously found that the D-Limit order type is a
``narrowly tailored tool that balances the ability of long-term
investors to access displayed liquidity in the ordinary course against
the current structural advantages enjoyed by short-term latency
arbitrage trading strategies that rely on superior access to the
fastest data and connectivity, while also encouraging liquidity
providers to post more displayed liquidity.'' \32\ The key feature of
the D-Limit order type is that, when IEX's CQI is triggered, the order
(if its limit price is equal to or higher (for a buy order; or lower
for a sell order) than the CQI Price) will automatically adjust to a
price one MPV lower (higher) than the CQI Price and the price will not
revert to the prior, more aggressive price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89686 (August 26,
2020), 85 FR 54438, 54443 (September 1, 2020) (SR-IEX-2019-15) (``D-
Limit Approval Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    IEX now seeks to offer Users the ability to attach an optional
instruction on a D-Limit order to either cancel or reprice the order
if, after 10 milliseconds since the D-Limit was price adjusted, the D-
Limit order is resting at a price that is less aggressive than the NBB
for buy orders or less aggressive than the NBO for sell orders.
Accordingly, the optional cancellation or re-pricing feature would
occur after a D-Limit order is initially adjusted to a less aggressive
price. It neither affects when nor how a D-Limit order is initially
price adjusted during a period of quote instability, and therefore, the
Commission believes that this proposal does not alter the core
attributes of the D-Limit order type.
    The Commission further believes that the triggering of the proposed
cancellation or re-pricing functionality is approporiately delayed to
an extent that would not be expected to confer a special advantage to
the User over other Users that elect to retain for themselves the
responsibility for canceling or updating their resting D-Limit orders.
To the extent some Users do not presently have the ability or capacity
to build the IEX-specific capability to track and respond when their D-
Limit orders have been price adjusted during periods of quote
instability, the proposal would allow those Users to utilize D-Limit
orders and manage those orders like Users that do have such ability. As
the Exchange notes in its filing, the 10 millisecond delay is
significantly longer than the aggregate sub-millisecond ``round trip''
latency that a User would encounter when manually re-pricing or
canceling a price-adjusted D-Limit order. The Commission accordingly
finds that the proposal does not permit unfair discrimination between
cutomers, issuers, brokers, or dealers in offering the option for Users
to instruct IEX to cancel or reprice its D-Limit order as described
above after 10 milliseconds have passed and the order remains priced
less aggressive than the national best quote. Given the 10 millisecond
delay, that functionlality should not provide a special advantage to
Users when compared to Users that have the technology and ability to
track and directly respond to D-Limit price adjustments more quickly by
themselves.
    Finally, the Commission finds that the proposal promotes just and
equitable principles of trade, removes impediments to and perfects the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, protects investors and the public interest in that it is
designed to cancel an adjusted D-Limit order only after 10 milliseconds
have passed and only where the order remains priced less aggressive
than the national best quote where it is less likely to receive an
execution. Alternatively, if the User selects the re-price option, the
D-Limit order will only re-price to a price more aggressive than that
at which it was resting and will not reprice to a less aggressive
price. As such, the new D-Limit functionality will re-price the D-Limit
order to join the NBB (for a buy order) or NBO (for a sell order), if
allowable given the order's limit price. In doing so, the proposal will
increase the liquidity available on IEX to all investors at the
national best quote.
    For the reasons discussed above, the Commission finds that the
proposal is narrowly tailored to not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Exchange Act, and is reasonably designed to among other things,
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system and, in general, protect investors
and the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission finds the proposed
rule change to be consistent with the Exchange Act, including the
requirements of Section 6(b)(5) and Section 6(b)(8) of the Exchange
Act.

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Exchange Act,\33\ that the proposed rule change (SR-IEX-2022-10), be,
and it hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-00555 Filed 1-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: February 18, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 31)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 7570-7573]
[DOCID:fr18fe09-16]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0132; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-081-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model EMB-135BJ, -135ER, -135KE, -135KL, -135LR, -145, -
145ER, -145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -145EP Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    During aircraft full scale fatigue test, it has been found the
occurrence of cracks in the cockpit windshield post lower eyelet
fitting at the attachment of the center post on the forward fuselage
(SSI 53-10-19). Further analysis of this cracking resulted in
modifications on the aircraft Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALI),
to include new inspection tasks and its respective intervals.
Undetected fatigue cracking in this area could adversely affect the
structural integrity of these airplanes.

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 20, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170--Putim--
12227-901 S[atilde]o Jose dos Campos--SP--BRASIL; telephone: +55 12
3927-5852 or +55 12 3309-0732; fax: +55 12 3927-7546; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.flyembraer.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1405; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0132;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-081-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC),
which is the aviation authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian
Airworthiness Directive 2007-07-02, effective August 21, 2007 (referred
to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    During aircraft full scale fatigue test, it has been found the
occurrence of cracks in the cockpit windshield post lower eyelet
fitting at the attachment of the center post on the forward fuselage
(SSI 53-10-19). Further analysis of this cracking resulted in
modifications on the aircraft Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALI),
to include new inspection tasks and its respective intervals.
Undetected fatigue cracking in this area could adversely affect the
structural integrity of these airplanes.

The corrective action is revising the Airworthiness Limitations Section
of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to incorporate new
structural inspection requirements. You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    EMBRAER has issued the following documents:
     The EMB135/ERJ140/EMB145 Maintenance Review Board Report
(MRBR) MRB-145/1150, Revision 11, dated September 19, 2007, which
includes Appendix 2, ``Airworthiness Limitation Requirements.''
     Appendix 2, ``Airworthiness Limitation Requirements,'' of
the Legacy BJ Maintenance Planning Guide (MPG) MPG-1483, Revision 5,
dated March 22, 2007, found in the EMBRAER Legacy Scheduled Maintenance
Requirements Document Manual, SMRD-1533.
    The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 709 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it
would take 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $56,720 or $80 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a

substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Empresa Brasileira De Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA-
2009-0132; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-081-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by March 20, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all EMBRAER Model EMB-135BJ, -135ER, -
135KE, -135KL, -135LR, -145, -145ER, -145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP,
and -145EP airplanes, certificated in any category, all serial
numbers, except EMB-145LR airplanes that have been modified in
accordance with Brazilian Supplemental Type Certificates 2002S06-09,
2002S06-10, and 2003S08-01.

    Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance according
to paragraph (g) of this AD. The request should include a
description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the airplane. The FAA has
provided guidance for this determination in Advisory Circular (AC)
25-1529-1A.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53:
Fuselage.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    During aircraft full scale fatigue test, it has been found the
occurrence of cracks in the cockpit windshield post lower eyelet
fitting at the attachment of the center post on the forward fuselage
(SSI 53-10-19). Further analysis of this cracking resulted in
modifications on the aircraft Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALI),
to include new inspection tasks and its respective intervals.
Undetected fatigue cracking in this area could adversely affect the
structural integrity of these airplanes.

The corrective action is revising the Airworthiness Limitations
Section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to
incorporate new structural inspection requirements.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD revise
the Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) of the Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness to incorporate the structural inspection
item (SSI) 53-10-19's applicable tasks identified in Appendix 2,
``Airworthiness Limitation Requirements,'' of the applicable
document listed in Table 1 of this AD. The initial compliance times
for the tasks start from the applicable time specified in SSI 53-10-
19 or within 200 flight cycles after revising the ALS, whichever
occurs later. Repeat the applicable inspection thereafter at the
interval specified in Appendix 2 of the applicable document listed
in Table 1 of this AD, except as provided by paragraphs (f)(2) and
(g) of this AD.

                      Table 1--Service Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Model                           EMBRAER Document
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMB-135ER, -135KE, -135KL, -135LR, -     EMB135/ERJ140/EMB145
 145, -145ER, -145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -   Maintenance Review Board
 145MP, and -145EP airplanes.             Report (MRBR) MRB-145/1150,
                                          Revision 11, dated September
                                          19, 2007.
EMB-135BJ airplanes....................  Legacy BJ--Maintenance Planning
                                          Guide (MPG) MPG-1483, Revision
                                          5, dated March 22, 2007, found
                                          in the EMBRAER Legacy
                                          Scheduled Maintenance
                                          Requirements Document Manual,
                                          SMRD-1533.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Note 2: Appendix 2, ``Airworthiness Limitation Requirements,''
of EMBRAER EMB135/ERJ140/EMB145 MRBR MRB-145/1150, Revision 11,
dated September 19, 2007, includes EMBRAER Temporary Revision 10-6,
dated May 23, 2007, which is referred to in the MCAI as an
applicable document to incorporate into the maintenance program.

    (2) After accomplishing the actions specified in paragraph
(f)(1) of this AD, no alternative inspections or inspection
intervals may be used unless the inspection or inspection interval
is approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, or the Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de
Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC) (or its delegated agent); or
unless the inspection or interval is approved as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (g)(1) of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 3: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
    (1) We have removed the requirement to mandate the SSI tasks in
Section 4--``Structural Inspection Requirements,'' of the applicable
document listed in Table 1 of this AD, which are referred to in the
MCAI. Those SSI tasks are included in Appendix 2, ``Airworthiness
Limitation Requirements,'' of the applicable document listed in
Table 1 of this AD.
    (2) We have not included the 21,336-flight-cycle threshold
specified in the MCAI because the airplanes in the U.S.-registered
fleet have surpassed that threshold. Instead, we included a 200-
flight-cycle grace period for accomplishing the SSI 53-10-19 tasks.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace
Engineer, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any
approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics
inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness Directive 2007-07-02,
effective August 21, 2007, and the service information listed in
Table 1 of this AD, for related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 30, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9-3399 Filed 2-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: May 2, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 84)]
[Notices]
[Page 24299-24300]
[DOCID:fr02my07-58]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0099; FRL-8126-4]

Pesticide Products; Registration Applications

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt of applications to register
pesticide products containing new active ingredients not included in
any previously registered products pursuant to the provisions of
section 3(c)(4) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA), as amended.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 1, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0099, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Room S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 South Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA 22202-3553. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Docket telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2007-0099. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The Federal regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index.
Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other

material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard

copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Room S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 South Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA 22202-3553.
The hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carmen Rodia, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. Registration Applications

    EPA received applications as follows to register pesticide products
containing active ingredients not included in any previously registered
products pursuant to the provision of section 3(c)(4) of FIFRA. Notice
of receipt of these applications does not imply a decision by the
Agency on the applications.

Products Containing Active Ingredients not Included in any Previously
Registered Products

    1. File Symbol: 71711-EA. Applicant: Bayer CropScience, LP in c/o
Nichino America, Inc., U.S. subsidiary of Nihon Nohyaku Co., Ltd., P.O.
Box 12014, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2014. Product Name:
Flubendiamide Technical. Product type: Insecticide. Active Ingredient:
Flubendiamide. Proposal Classification/Use: For formulation into end-
use products.
    2. File Symbol: 264-RNEA. Applicant: Bayer CropScience, LP, P.O.
Box 12014, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2014. Product Name: NNI-
0001 24 WG (SYNAPSE). Product type: Insecticide. Active Ingredient:
Flubendiamide at 24%. Proposal Classification/Use: Insecticide for
controlling lepidopterous insect pests on vegetables (Brassica (cole)
leafy, fruiting, leafy (except Brassica) and cucurbit).
    3. File Symbol: 264-RNEL. Applicant: Bayer CropScience. Product
Name: NNI-0001 480 SC (BELT). Product type: Insecticide. Active
Ingredient: Flubendiamide at 39%. Proposal Classification/Use:
Insecticide for controlling lepidopterous insect pests on pome and
stone fruit, nut trees, grapes, corn, cotton and tobacco.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pest.

    Dated: April 19, 2007.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E7-8268 Filed 5-1-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48474-48476]
[FR Doc No: 2022-17053]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC22-98-000.
    Applicants: NaturEner Glacier Wind Energy 1, LLC, NaturEner Glacier
Wind Energy 2, LLC, NaturEner Power Watch, LLC, NaturEner Rim Rock Wind
Energy, LLC, NaturEner Wind Watch, LLC, Berkshire Hathaway Energy
Company.
    Description: Joint Application for Authorization Under Section 203
of the Federal Power Act of NaturEner Glacier Wind Energy 1, LLC, et
al.
    Filed Date: 8/2/22.
    Accession Number: 20220802-5135.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/22.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following Complaints
and Compliance filings in EL Dockets:

    Docket Numbers: EL22-81-000; TX22-8-000.
    Applicants: Kimball Wind, LLC v. Western Area Power Administration,
Rocky Mountain Region, Kimball Wind, LLC v. Western Area Power
Administration, Rocky Mountain Region.

    Description: Complaint of Kimball Wind, LLC v. Western Area Power
Administration, Rocky Mountain Region.
    Filed Date: 8/2/22.
    Accession Number: 20220802-5172.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/1/22.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1547-014; ER10-1975-029; ER10-2421-009; ER10-
2585-009; ER10-2586-002; ER10-2590-010; ER10-2593-010; ER10-2613-009;
ER10-2616-023; ER10-2617-011; ER10-2619-012; ER10-2677-015; ER10-3247-
015; ER11-2457-009; ER11-3857-016; ER11-3867-016; ER11-4266-017; ER11-
4400-020; ER12-75-012; ER12-192-016; ER12-1769-011; ER12-2250-010;
ER12-2251-010; ER12-2252-011; ER12-2253-010; ER13-2475-013; ER14-883-
016; ER14-924-008; ER14-1569-016; ER14-2245-010; ER15-1596-016; ER15-
1598-008; ER15-1599-016; ER15-1600-007; ER15-1602-007; ER15-1605-007;
ER15-1607-007; ER15-2535-005; ER16-1761-001; ER17-1906-004; ER19-102-
009; ER19-158-011; ER19-2803-008; ER19-2806-008; ER19-2807-008; ER19-
2809-008; ER19-2810-008; ER19-2811-008; ER20-2414-004; ER20-2415-004;
ER21-2346-001; ER21-2347-001.
    Applicants: Blackstone Power Generation LLC, Bellingham Power
Generation LLC, Moss Landing Energy Storage 2, LLC, Moss Landing Energy
Storage 1, LLC, Viridian Energy, LLC, Viridian Energy PA, LLC, Viridian
Energy NY, LLC, Energy Rewards, LLC, Connecticut Gas & Electric, Inc.,
Cincinnati Bell Energy LLC, Ambit Northeast, LLC, Luminant Energy
Company LLC, Lake Road Generating Company, LLC, Calumet Energy Team,
LLC, Midwest Electric Power, Inc., Dynegy Washington II, LLC, Dynegy
Miami Fort, LLC, Dynegy Hanging Rock II, LLC, Dynegy Fayette II, LLC,
Dynegy Energy Services (East), LLC, Dynegy Dicks Creek, LLC, Dynegy
Commercial Asset Management, LLC, TriEagle Energy, LP, Dynegy Energy
Services, LLC, Illinois Power Resources Generating, LLC, Illinois Power
Marketing Company, Kincaid Generation, L.L.C., Public Power & Utility
of Maryland, LLC, Public Power, LLC of Pennsylvania, Public Power &
Utility of NY, Inc, Public Power & Utility of New Jersey, LLC, Viridian
Energy NG, LLC, Liberty Electric Power, LLC, Public Power & Utility,
Inc., Dynegy Power Marketing, LLC, Richland-Stryker Generation LLC,
MASSPOWER, Milford Power Company, LLC, Massachusetts Gas & Electric,
Inc., Electric Energy, Inc., Pleasants Energy, LLC, Dynegy Kendall
Energy, LLC, Ontelaunee Power Operating Co., LLC, Dynegy Marketing and
Trade, LLC, Sithe/Independence Power Partners, L.P., Dynegy Oakland,
LLC, Dynegy Moss Landing, LLC, Dynegy Midwest Generation, Inc., Casco
Bay Energy Company, LLC, Energy Services Providers, Inc., North Jersey
Energy Associates, L.P., Hopewell Cogeneration Limited Partnership.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Hopewell Cogeneration
Limited Partnership, et al.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5399.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1841-026; ER10-1852-069; ER10-1907-025; ER10-
1918-026; ER10-1950-026; ER10-1951-047; ER10-1970-025; ER10-1972-025;
ER10-2005-026; ER11-26-026; ER11-4462-069; ER12-1660-025; ER13-2458-
020; ER13-2461-020; ER16-1872-016; ER16-2506-018; ER17-838-044; ER17-
2270-017; ER18-1771-015; ER18-2224-016; ER18-2246-015; ER19-987-013;
ER19-1003-013; ER19-1393-013; ER19-1394-013; ER19-2373-009; ER19-2382-
009; ER19-2398-011; ER19-2437-009; ER19-2461-009; ER20-122-007; ER20-
1220-007; ER20-1769-007; ER20-1879-008; ER20-1987-008; ER20-2690-007;
ER21-1320-003; ER21-1953-005; ER21-2048-004; ER21-2100-004; ER22-381-
004.
    Applicants: Dunns Bridge Solar Center, LLC, Point Beach Solar, LLC,
Sac County Wind, LLC, Heartland Divide Wind II, LLC, Crystal Lake Wind
Energy III, LLC, Jordan Creek Wind Farm LLC, Cerro Gordo Wind, LLC,
Oliver Wind I, LLC, Chicot Solar, LLC, Oliver Wind II, LLC, Crowned
Ridge Interconnection, LLC, Crowned Ridge Wind, LLC, Emmons-Logan Wind,
LLC, Hancock County Wind, LLC, Story County Wind, LLC, Ashtabula Wind
I, LLC, Endeavor Wind II, LLC, Endeavor Wind I, LLC, Crystal Lake Wind
Energy II, LLC, Crystal Lake Wind Energy I, LLC, Heartland Divide Wind
Project, LLC, Pegasus Wind, LLC, Langdon Renewables, LLC, Stuttgart
Solar, LLC, NextEra Energy Marketing, LLC, Oliver Wind III, LLC,
Marshall Solar, LLC, Pheasant Run Wind, LLC, Tuscola Wind II, LLC,
Tuscola Bay Wind, LLC,NEPM II, LLC, Ashtabula Wind III, LLC, Ashtabula
Wind II, LLC, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, NextEra Energy Duane
Arnold, LLC, Gexa Energy L.L.C., Garden Wind, LLC, FPL Energy North
Dakota Wind II, LLC, FPL Energy North Dakota Wind, LLC, Florida Power &
Light Company, Butler Ridge Wind Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Butler Ridge Wind Energy
Center, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5294.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1852-068; ER10-1890-022; ER10-1951-046; ER10-
1962-022; ER19-1076-007; ER11-2160-022; ER19-1073-007; ER11-4462-068;
ER11-4677-022; ER11-4678-022; ER17-804-002; ER12-631-023; ER12-676-018;
ER12-2444-021; ER13-1991-022; ER13-1992-022; ER13-2112-017; ER15-1016-
015; ER15-1375-016; ER15-1418-016; ER15-1883-016; ER15-2243-013; ER15-
2477-015; ER16-90-015; ER16-91-015; ER16-632-015; ER16-2443-012; ER17-
582-014; ER17-583-014; ER17-838-043; ER17-2340-012; ER20-819-009; ER20-
820-008; ER20-2695-007; ER21-1580-004; ER21-1813-006; ER21-1814-006;
ER21-2294-004; ER21-2304-004; ER22-415-004; ER22-1370-002.
    Applicants: Sunlight Storage, LLC, Arlington Energy Center III,
LLC, Arlington Solar, LLC, Arlington Energy Center II, LLC, Yellow Pine
Energy Center II, LLC, Yellow Pine Energy Center I, LLC, Sky River
Wind, LLC, Mohave County Wind Farm LLC, Blythe Solar IV, LLC, Blythe
Solar III, LLC, Golden Hills North Wind, LLC, NextEra Energy Marketing,
LLC, Whitney Point Solar, LLC, Westside Solar, LLC, NextEra Blythe
Solar Energy Center, LLC, Blythe Solar II, LLC, Blythe Solar 110, LLC,
Golden Hills Interconnection, LLC, Golden Hills Wind, LLC, Silver State
Solar Power South, LLC, Adelanto Solar, LLC, Adelanto Solar II, LLC,
McCoy Solar, LLC, Shafter Solar, LLC, Genesis Solar, LLC, Desert
Sunlight 300, LLC, Desert Sunlight 250, LLC, North Sky River Energy,
LLC, Perrin Ranch Wind, LLC, Windpower Partners 1993, LLC, Coram
California Development, L.P., Vasco Winds, LLC, NextEra Energy
Montezuma II Wind, LLC,NEPM II, LLC, Alta Wind VIII, LLC, FPL Energy
Montezuma Wind, LLC, Windstar Energy, LLC, High Winds, LLC, Gexa Energy
L.L.C., FPL Energy Green Power Wind, LLC, Florida Power & Light
Company.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Florida Power & Light
Company, et al.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5293.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3035-002.
    Applicants: Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership.

    Description: Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership
submits Informational Filing to Schedule 2 of MISO's Tariff.
    Filed Date: 7/21/22.
    Accession Number: 20220721-5137.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1553-006.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits Compliance
Filing.
    Filed Date: 8/2/22.
    Accession Number: 20220802-5173.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-281-002.
    Applicants: MidAmerican Energy Company.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Amendment to Services Tariff (Docket
No. ER21-281) to be effective 1/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20220803-5027.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/24/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-1679-000.
    Applicants: Google Energy LLC.
    Description: Supplement to April 22, 2022 Google Energy LLC tariff
filing.
    Filed Date: 6/16/22.
    Accession Number: 20220616-5181.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-1698-003.
    Applicants: EDF Spring Field WPC, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Amendment to 3 to be effective 6/28/
2022.
    Filed Date: 8/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20220803-5114.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/24/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2089-001.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company,
Mississippi Power Company.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Alabama Power Company submits tariff
filing per 35.17(b): Supplement to Origis Development (Thalmann 1 Solar
& Battery) LGIA Filing to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20220803-5101.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/24/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2090-001.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company,
Mississippi Power Company.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Alabama Power Company submits tariff
filing per 35.17(b): Supplement to Origis Development (Thalmann 2 Solar
& Battery) LGIA Filing to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20220803-5102.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/24/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2588-000.
    Applicants: Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: NWPP Tariff Volume No. 9,
Version 3.0.0 to be effective 10/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/2/22.
    Accession Number: 20220802-5104.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2589-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of New Mexico.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Notice of Cancellation Rate Schedule
No. 45 to be effective 10/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/2/22.
    Accession Number: 20220802-5110.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2590-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Third Amendment to ISA,
Service Agreement No. 5548; Queue No. AC1-076/AE2-134 to be effective
12/16/2019.
    Filed Date: 8/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20220803-5017.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/24/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2591-000.
    Applicants: Florida Power & Light Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: FPL & FMPA Amendment No. 6
to Rate Schedule No. 74 to be effective 10/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20220803-5054.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/24/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2592-000.
    Applicants: Link Energy Incorporated.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Notice of Cancellation of MBR Tariff
to be effective 8/4/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20220803-5058.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/24/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2593-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company,
Mississippi Power Company.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Alabama Power Company submits tariff
filing per 35.15: Pembroke Energy Project LGIA Termination Filing to be
effective 8/3/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20220803-5062.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/24/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2594-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of Colorado.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2022-08-03 Plains Hopper-
FESA/SISA T-T 707-0.0.0 to be effective 8/4/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20220803-5070.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/24/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2595-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Notice of cancellation of SGIA SA
No. 2549 for NorthCountry Solar project to be effective 3/14/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20220803-5089.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/24/22.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 3, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-17053 Filed 8-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 16, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55319-55320]
[FR Doc No: 2019-22470]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2019-0001]

Notice of Adjustment of Minimum Project Worksheet Amount

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice that the minimum Project Worksheet Amount
under the Public Assistance program for disasters and emergencies
declared on or after October 1, 2019, will be increased.

DATES: This adjustment applies to major disasters and emergencies
declared on or after October 1, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tod Wells, Recovery Directorate,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act 42 U.S.C. 5121-5207 and 44 CFR 206.202(d)(2)
provide that FEMA will annually adjust the minimum Project Worksheet
amount under the Public Assistance program to reflect changes in the
Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the
Department of Labor.
    FEMA gives notice of an increase to $3,300 for the minimum amount
that will be approved for any Project Worksheet under the Public
Assistance program for all major disasters and emergencies declared on
or after October 1, 2019.
    FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price
Index for All Urban Consumers of 1.7 percent for the 12-month period
that ended in August 2019. This is based on information released by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics at the U.S. Department of Labor on September
12, 2019.

    Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Disaster
Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters).

Pete Gaynor,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2019-22470 Filed 10-15-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-11-P