                                 Docket Index
                         Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
            South Coast 2012 1-Hour Ozone Attainment Demonstration
                      (Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0185)
                                  May 5, 2014

      A.  Rulemaking Documents
   A-1.       Docket Index, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, South Coast 2012 1-Hour Ozone Attainment Demonstration, (Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0185), May 5, 2014.
   A-2.       Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision; South Coast; 1-Hour Ozone; Proposed Rule, signed May 5, 2014, prepublication version.
      B.  State Submittals
B-1. 	Letter, James N. Goldstene, Executive Officer, CARB to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9, February 13, 2013, with enclosures.
          a. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan, December 2012 + 10 Appendices.
          b. SCAQMD Governing Board Resolution No. 12-19 (December 7, 2012).
          c. Letter, Barry Wallerstein, SCAQMD to James Goldstene, CARB, January 20, 2013.
          d. CARB Board Hearing transcript.
          e. CARB, Staff Report, Proposed Revisions to the PM2.5 and Ozone State Implementation Plans for the South Coast Air Basin, Release Date January 11, 2013.
          f. SCAQMD Notice of Public Hearing to Consider the Approval of the South Coast 2012 AQMP, December 7, 2012.
          g. CARB Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Approval of the South Coast 2012 AQMP, December 21, 2012.
          h. CARB Resolution No. 13-3 (January 25, 2013).
          i. Public comments received during SCAQMD adoption process. (4 files)
          j. Public comments received during State adoption process. (13 files)

      B-2. 	Letter from Barry Wallerstein, Executive Officer, South Coast AQMD, to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9, dated May 1, 2014.

      B-3. 	 Letter from Richard W. Corey, Executive Officer, California Air Resources Board, to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9, dated May 2, 2014.

      C.  Federal Register and EPA Guidance Documents
      C-1.       79 FR 6584, California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Off- Highway Recreational Vehicles and Engines; Notice of Decision (February 4, 2014).

      C-2.       79 FR 364, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District, Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District, Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District, and South Coast Air Quality Management District, Direct Final Rule (January 3, 2014).

      C-3.       78 FR 58459, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District, Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, South Coast Air Quality Management District and Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, Final rule (September 24, 2013).

      C-4.       78 FR 58090, California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Off-Road Compression Ignition Engines -- In-Use Fleets; Notice of Decision; Notice (September 20, 2013).

      C-5.       78 FR 30768, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, final rule (May 23, 2013).

      C-6.       78 FR 21542, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District and South Coast Air Quality Management District, direct final rule (April 11, 2013).

      C-7.       78 FR 18853, Revision to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, direct final rule (March 28, 2013).

      C-8.       78 FR 18244, Revision to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, final rule (March 26, 2013).

      C-9.       78 FR 14533, Official Release of EMFAC2011 Motor Vehicle Emission Factor Model for Use in the State of California, notice of availability (March 6, 2013).

      C-10.       78 FR 889,   Finding of Substantial Inadequacy of Implementation Plan; Call for California State Implementation Plan Revision; South Coast, final rule (January 7, 2013).

      C-11.       77 FR 71129, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San Joaquin Valley United Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) and South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), final rule (November 29, 2012).

      C-12.       77 FR 70707, Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; California; San Joaquin Valley and South Coast; Attainment Plan for the 1997 8-hour Ozone Standards; Technical Amendments; final rule, technical amendments (November 27, 2012).

      C-13.       77 FR 58072, Finding of Substantial Inadequacy of Implementation Plan; Call for California State Implementation Plan Revision; South Coast, proposed rule (September 19, 2012).

      C-14.       77 FR 30088Air Quality Designations for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards; Implementation of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Nonattainment Area Classifications Approach, Attainment Deadlines and Revocation of the 1997 Ozone Standards for Transportation Conformity Purposes; Final Rules (May 21, 2012).

      C-15.       77 FR 20308 Approval and Promulgation of Implementations Plans; California Air Resources Board -- In-Use Heavy-Duty Diesel-Fueled Truck and Bus Regulation, and Drayage Truck Regulation, final rule (April 4, 2012).

      C-16.       77 FR 12674, Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; California; South Coast; Attainment Plan for 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standards, final rule. (March 1, 2012).

      C-17.       77 FR 9239, California State Motor Vehicle and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Truck Idling Requirements; Notice of Decision (February 16, 2012).
      C-18.       76 FR 82133 Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; California; Determinations of Failure To Attain the One-Hour Ozone Standard, final rule (December 30, 2011).
      C-19.       76 FR 77515 California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth in California Ports; Notice of Decision (December 13, 2011).
      C-20.       76 FR 70888, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, final rule. (November 16, 2011).
      C-21.       76 FR 69896, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California; 2008 San Joaquin Valley PM2.5 Plan and 2007 State Strategy; Final rule, (November 9, 2011).
      C-22.       76 FR 69928, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California; 2007 South Coast PM2.5 Plan and 2007 State Strategy; Final rule. (November 9, 2011).
      C-23.       76 FR 60376, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Santa Barbara Air Pollution Control District, Sacramento Municipal Air Quality Management District and South Coast Air Quality Management District, direct final rule (September 29, 2011).

      C-24.       76 FR 572846 Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; California; San Joaquin Valley; Attainment Plan for 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard; Proposed Rule (September 16, 2011).

      C-25.       76 FR 40303, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, proposed rule, (July 8, 2011).

      C-26.       75 FR 46845, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, final rule (August 4, 2010).

      C-27.       75 FR 24409, Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; California; San Joaquin Valley, South Coast Air Basin, Coachella Valley, and Sacramento Metro 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Areas; Reclassification, final rule (May 5, 2010).

      C-28.       75 FR 10420, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans: 1-Hour Ozone Extreme Area Plan for San Joaquin Valley, CA Final rule (March 8, 2010).

      C-29.       74 FR 67821, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, final rule (December 21, 2009).

      C-30.       74 FR 33933, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans: 1-Hour Ozone Extreme Area Plan for San Joaquin Valley, CA, proposed rule (July 14, 2009).

      C-31.       74 FR 20880, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, final rule (May 6, 2009).

      C-32.       74 FR 18995, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, final rule (April 27, 2009).

      C-33.       74 FR 10176, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of California; 2003 State Strategy and 2003 South Coast Plan for One-Hour Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide, final rule, (March 10, 2009).

      C-34.       73 FR 76947, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, final rule (December 18, 2008).

      C-35.       73 FR 74027, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, final rule (December 5, 2008).

      C-36.       73 FR 16436 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone, final rule (March 27, 2008).

      C-37.       72 FR 49196, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, final rule (August 28, 2007).

      C-38.       Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses for Air Quality Goals in Attainment Demonstrations for Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze," April 2007.

      C-39.       69 FR 43518, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, final rule (July 21, 2004).

      C-40.       69 FR 30006, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans for California -- San Joaquin Valley PM - 10 Nonattainment Area; Serious Area Plan for Attainment of the 24-Hour and Annual PM - 10 Standards, final rule (May 26, 2004).

      C-41.       69 FR 23858 Air Quality Designations and Classifications for the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards; Early Action Compact Areas With Deferred Effective Dates, final rule (April 30, 2004).
      C-42.

      C-43.        Guidance for the 1-hour Ozone Nonattainment Areas that Rely on Weight-of-Evidence for Attainment Demonstrations, Mid-Course Review Guidance" (March 28, 2002).

      C-44.       66 FR 57160 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Houston/Galveston Nonattainment Area; Ozone (November 14, 2001).

      C-45.       Memorandum from John S. Seitz, Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, "Additional Submission on RACM from States with Severe One-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area SIPs," (December 14, 2000).

      C-46.        65 FR 18903 Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; California-South Coast, final rule (April 10, 2000).

      C-47.       Memorandum entitled "Guidance on Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM) Requirements and Attainment Demonstration Submissions for the Ozone NAAQS," John Seitz (November 30, 1999).

      C-48.       Guidance for Improving Weight-of-Evidence Through Identification of Additional Emission Reduction Not Modeled (November 1999).

      C-49.       62 FR 38856, National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone, final rule (July 18, 1997).

      C-50.       62 FR 1150 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California Ozone, final rule (January 8, 1997).

      C-51.       "Guidance on Use of Modeled Results to Demonstrate Attainment of the Ozone NAAQS," EPA-454/B-95-007 (June 1996).

      C-52.       57 FR 13498 State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, General Preamble for Proposed Future Rulemakings (April 16, 1992).

      C-53.       56 FR 56694 Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes, final rule, (November 6, 1991).

      C-54.       Guideline for Regulatory Application of the Urban Airshed Model, EPA-450/4-91-013 (July 1991).

      C-55.       44 FR 20372 "State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for Proposed Rulemaking on Approval of Plan Revisions for Nonattainment Areas," (April 4, 1979).

      C-56.       44 FR 8202 Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Photochemical Oxidants, final rulemaking (February 8, 1979).

      C-57.       43 FR 8962 Attainment Status Designations, final rulemaking (March 3, 1978).

   D. Other State Submittals
      D-1.       Letter, James N. Goldstene, Executive Officer, CARB, to Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9, November 16, 2007.
      a.             California Air Resources Board, Proposed State Strategy for California's 2007 State Implementation Plan, adopted September 27, 2007. (9 files)
      b.             CARB Resolution No. 07-28, September 27, 2007 with attachments A & B (3 files).
      c.             State of California, Air Resource Board, Executive Order No. S-07-002, November 15, 2007.
      D-1.       Letter, James Goldstene, Executive Officer, CARB to Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9, November 28, 2007 (transmitting South Coast 2007 AQMP).
      a.             South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2007 AQMP, June 1, 2007 + 10 Appendices.
      b.             SCAQMD Governing Board Resolution No. 07-9 (June 1, 2007).
      c.             CARB, Staff Report, Analysis of the South Coast 2007 AQMP, September 21, 2007 (Report and 3 appendices).
      d.             CARB Resolution No. 07-41 (September 27, 2007).
      D-1.       Letter, James N. Goldstene, Executive Officer, CARB, to Laura Yoshii, Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9, August 12, 2009.
      a.             California Air Resources Board, Status Report on the State Strategy for California's 2007 State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Proposed Revisions to the SIP Reflecting Implementation of the 2007 State Strategy, adopted April 24, 2009.
      b.             CARB Resolution No. 09-34, April 24, 2009.
      D-1.       Letter, James N. Goldstene, Executive Officer, CARB to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9, July 29, 2011, with enclosures.
      a.             CARB, "8-Hour Ozone State Implementation Plan Revisions and Technical Revisions to the PM2.5 State Implementation Plan Transportation Conformity Budgets for the South Coast and San Joaquin Valley Air Basins," July 21, 2011.
      b.             CARB Resolution No. 11- 22, July 21, 2011.
      c.             State of California, Air Resource Board, Executive Order No. S-11-016, July 29, 2011.
      D-1.       Letter, James N. Goldstene, Executive Officer, CARB to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9, August 29, 2011.

      D-2.       The South Coast annual monitoring plan, Appendix A, contains a map of the SCAQMD ozone monitoring network at this URL: http://aqmd.gov/tao/AQ-Reports/AQMonitoringNetworkPlan/AppendixA.pdf, page A-1.

      D-3. SCAQMD Technology Advancement Office, Clean Fuels Program
            2012 Annual Report and 2013 Plan Update, March 2013, available at this URL: http://aqmd.gov/tao/Demonstration/Reports/2012AnnualReport_2013PlanUpdate.pdf.

      D-4.       Letter from Richard W. Corey, Executive Officer, California Air Resources Board, to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9, dated March 6, 2014.

   E. Other Documents
       E-1.       Amended Opinion, Association of Irritated Residents v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Docket Nos. 09-71383 and 09-71404 (consolidated) January 27, 2012.
       E-2.       Letter, Lynn Terry, Deputy Executive Office, CARB, to Deborah Jordan, Director, Air Division, EPA - Region 9, August 10, 2011.
                  a. Attachment 1 to August 10, 2011 letter.
                  b. Attachment 2 to August 10, 2011 letter.
       E-3.       Letter, James Goldstene, Executive Officer, CARB to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9, November 18, 2011.
       E-4.       Electronic mail from Michael Flagg, USEPA Region 9, Air Quality Analysis office, to Wienke Tax, USEPA Region 9, Air Planning office, dated February 11, 2014 with six attachments.
                  a. SC 1 hr DV
                  b. SC 1 hr DV monitor
                  c. SC 1-hr max
                  d. South Coast_1HourMax_1990-2013
                  e. South Coast_Max1HourOzone_1990-2013
                  f. South Coast_Ozone_Workbook_2008-2013
      E-5. 	Electronic mail from Michael Flagg, USEPA Region 9, Air Quality Analysis office, to Wienke Tax, USEPA Region 9, Air Planning office, dated February 26, 2014.
                  g. E-5a. South Coast 1-hour max 1990-2013 spreadsheet

      E-6.  	Memorandum to  Docket EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0185 from  Carol Bohnenkamp, Air Quality Analysis Office, EPA Region 9, "Review of the Modeling for the Attainment Demonstration for the Proposed Rulemaking Action on the South Coast 2012 AQMP for the One Hour Ozone Standard", dated May 1, 2014.

      E-7. 	http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/levprog/levprog.htm contains a description of the CARB Low Emission Vehicle program.

      E-8.  	http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/zevprog/zevprog.htm contains a description of the CARB Zero Emission Vehicle program.

      E-9.	 http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/clean_cars/acc%20summary-final.pdf contains a description of the CARB Advanced Clean Car program.

      E-10. 	Southern California Association of Governments, 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, available at: http://rtpscs.scag.ca.gov/Pages/2012-2035-RTP-SCS.aspx.

      E-11. 	See http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/aqip/demo.htm for a listing of 2009-2013 AQIP-funded projects.

      E-12. 	U.S. EPA Region 9, CARB Rules and Measures 1990-2013, May 2, 2014.

   F. Public Comments


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 198 (Thursday, October 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 63680]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26440]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-65511; File No. 4-639]

Public Roundtable on Execution, Clearance and Settlement of
Microcap Securities

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Notice of roundtable discussion; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Monday, October 17, 2011, commencing at 1 p.m. and ending
at 5 p.m., staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Agency'') will hold a public roundtable meeting at which invited
participants will discuss various issues related to the Execution,
Clearance and Settlement of Microcap Securities.
    The roundtable discussion will be held in the multi-purpose room of
the Securities and Exchange Commission headquarters at 100 F Street,
NE., in Washington, DC on Monday, October 17, 2011, commencing at 1
p.m. and ending at 5 p.m. The public is invited to observe the
roundtable discussion. Seating will be available on a first-come,
first-served basis. The roundtable discussion also will be available
via webcast on the Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
    The roundtable will consist of a series of three panels. Panelists
will consider a range of microcap securities topics, such as the
current issues facing small cap issuers in the clearance and settlement
process, potential regulatory changes impacting the Over-The-Counter
markets, and Anti-Money Laundering concerns specific to microcap
issuers.

DATES: The roundtable discussion will be held on Monday, October 17,
2011. The Commission will accept comments regarding issues addressed at
the roundtable until October 31, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/other.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number 4-639 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number 4-639. This file number
should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help us
process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one
method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov). Comments are also available for
Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. All comments received will
be posted without change; we do not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Microcap Roundtable Hotline at
(202) 551-6607, Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE., in Washington, DC 20549-7010.

    Dated: October 7, 2011.

    By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-26440 Filed 10-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


From: Wilson, Erika  Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 3:49 PM To: M. V. Ramana Cc: Bremer, Kristen; Hackel, Angela; Risley, David Subject: RE: Website Comment: Carbon Pollution Standards

Hello

For the full EE calculations, please see the data file titled "GHG Abatement - Scenario 1" (http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-06/20140602tsd-ghg-abatement-measures-scenario1.xlsx) of the GHG Abatement Measures TSD (available here: http://www2.epa.gov/carbon-pollution-standards/clean-power-plan-proposed-rule-technical-documents).  Both the spreadsheet and TSD walk through the calculation.  In your email, you noted that to get your numbers you multiplied the incremental savings (%) by the BAU sales demand. To replicate our calculation, you should multiply the incremental savings by the previous year's "sales after net EE."  See p. 5-41 of GHG Abatement TSD for more information.

Thank you for your inquiry and your interest in the Clean Power Plan.

Erika Wilson Clean Air Markets Division Office of Atmospheric Programs Office of Air and Radiation U.S. EPA 202.343.9113 <EMAIL_ADDRESS> ________________________________________ From: Bremer, Kristen Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 9:36 AM To: M. V. Ramana Subject: RE: Website Comment: Carbon Pollution Standards

Yes - I received your email and passed it along to our technical team on Wednesday. Please know that we value all questions and comments and will do our best to respond in a timely manner; however, given current workloads and schedules it may take longer to receive a response.

______________________________ Kristen Bremer Policy Analysis & Communications U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER> Cell:<PHONE_NUMBER>

-----Original Message----- From: M. V. Ramana<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 8:38 AM To: Bremer, Kristen Subject: Fwd: Website Comment: Carbon Pollution Standards

Dear Kristen,

I was just checking if you did get this email of mine.

Thank you, Ramana

Begin forwarded message:

From: "M.V. Ramana"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: Re: Website Comment: Carbon Pollution Standards Date: October 22, 2014 at 3:38:32 PM EDT To: "Bremer, Kristen"<EMAIL_ADDRESS> Dear Kristen,

I was trying to reproduce the example case for energy efficiency in the technical support document on GHG abatement measures (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0602). In the document, on page 5-45, in table 5-20, the results for South Carolina are listed as:

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 82,451 83,359 84,278 85,206 86,145 87,094 88,054 89,024 90,005 0.34% 0.54% 0.74% 0.94% 1.14% 1.34% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 274 440 608 777 945 1,113 1,250 1,249 1,249 82,177 82,660 83,008 83,229 83,333 83,329 83,258 83,264 83,346 0 14 38 70 110 160 219 285 350 274 700 1,270 1,977 2,812 3,765 4,796 5,760 6,659 0.33% 0.84% 1.51% 2.32% 3.26% 4.32% 5.45% 6.47% 7.40%

However, if you carry out the operations that are mentioned in the TSD, the figures I get for the third and fourth rows are:

276 440 614 786 962 1142 1290 1302 1317 82,175 82,643 82,949 83,090 83,067 82,874 82,544 82,212 81,876

Some of the discrepancies are probably because of round-off but the latter discrepancies are too large to explain this way. Further, the last three columns have the same savings percentage, but because the BAU generation is increasing, the annual incremental savings should also be increasing. Instead, these numbers are decreasing slightly. I am attaching my spread sheet in which I did these calculations and derived the above figures. I tried to look for the underlying calculations in the spreadsheets but I can't seem to find it. The numbers themselves are in the abatement measures scenario1.xlsx file in the Sorted by State tab (row 845 and 846, colums J through R). But that doesn't calculate anything. Each cell points to a cell in Sorted_by_State, which then points to a table in the IntermediateData tab, which then leads me nowhere. So where are these figures actually calculated? I assume that somewhere in the spreadsheet 90,005 must be multiplied by 1.50 % to derive the 1,249 figure. And so on. But it is not apparent where that is.

Please forward this question to the appropriate person.

Thank you very much, Ramana

On Oct 22, 2014, at 10:49 AM, Bremer, Kristen<EMAIL_ADDRESS>wrote:

You may contact me with any questions and I will forward them to the appropriate technical staff.

______________________________ Kristen Bremer Policy Analysis & Communications U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER> Cell:<PHONE_NUMBER>

---- M. V. Ramana Nuclear Futures Laboratory & Program on Science and Global Security Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs Princeton University 221 Nassau Street, Floor 2 Princeton NJ 08542 Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Webpages: nuclearfutures.princeton.edu & www.princeton.edu/sgs


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 21, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 93590-93592]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29306]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-8845; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-094-AD;
Amendment 39-18732; AD 2016-25-06]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83),
and DC-9-87 (MD-87) airplanes; and Model MD-88 airplanes. This AD was
prompted by a report of fatigue cracking in a rear spar lower cap of
the horizontal stabilizer. This AD requires repetitive inspections for
cracking of the rear spar lower caps of the horizontal stabilizer,
post-modification and post-repair inspections, and corrective actions
if necessary. This AD also provides an optional terminating fatigue
life enhancement modification. We are issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective January 25, 2017.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of January 25,
2017.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
8845.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
8845 or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Haytham Alaidy, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone:
562-627-5224; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all The Boeing Company
Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), and DC-9-87
(MD-87) airplanes; and Model MD-88 airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on August 22, 2016 (81 FR 56540) (``the NPRM''). The
NPRM was prompted by a report of fatigue cracking in a rear spar lower
cap of the horizontal stabilizer. The NPRM proposed to require
repetitive inspections for cracking of the rear spar lower caps of the
horizontal stabilizer, post-modification and post-repair inspections,
and corrective actions if necessary. The proposed AD also included an
optional terminating fatigue life enhancement modification. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking in the rear spar
lower caps of the horizontal stabilizer, which, paired with cracking in
adjacent areas, could adversely affect the structural integrity of the
airplane.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We have considered the comment received. Boeing supported the
NPRM.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD as proposed, except for minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A072, dated April
8, 2016. The service information describes procedures for doing
inspections for cracking of the rear spar lower caps of the horizontal
stabilizer, post-modification and post-repair inspections, and
corrective actions. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 395 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
              Action                       Labor cost             Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection.......................  3 work-hours x $85 per                  $0         $255 per     $100,725 per
                                    hour = $255 per                                 inspection       inspection
                                    inspection cycle.                                    cycle           cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                      Estimated Costs for Optional Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Action                            Labor cost                Parts cost        Cost per  product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification......................  59 work-hours x $85 per hour =             $1,267   $6,282 per stabilizer.
                                     $5,015 per stabilizer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacement
that would be required based on the results of the inspection. We have
no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need this
replacement:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Action                            Labor cost                Parts cost        Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement.......................  368 work-hours x $85 per hour =           $31,408   $62,688 per stabilizer.
                                     $31,280 per stabilizer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions that require repair using a
method specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2016-25-06 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18732; Docket No. FAA-
2016-8845; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-094-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective January 25, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model DC-9-81 (MD-81),
DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), and DC-9-87 (MD-87) airplanes; and
Model MD-88 airplanes; certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 55, Stabilizers.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report of fatigue cracking in a Model
MD-88 rear spar lower cap of the horizontal stabilizer. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking in the rear
spar lower caps of the horizontal stabilizer, which, paired with
cracking in adjacent areas, could adversely affect the structural
integrity of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Repetitive Inspections and Corrective Actions

    Except as specified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD, at the
applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A072, dated April 8, 2016: Do
an open hole high frequency eddy current inspection (HFEC) or
surface HFEC inspection for cracking of the rear spar lower caps of
the horizontal stabilizer, and do all applicable corrective actions;
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD80-55A072, dated April 8, 2016, except as
specified in paragraph (i)(2) of this AD. Do all applicable
corrective actions before further flight. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at the applicable interval specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A072, dated
April 8, 2016, until accomplishment of the actions provided by
paragraph (h) of this AD.

(h) Optional Terminating Action

    Accomplishment of the fatigue life enhancement modification in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD80-55A072, dated April 8, 2016, terminates the
repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD.

(i) Service Information Exceptions

    (1) Where paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD80-55A072, dated April 8, 2016, specifies a
compliance time ``after the original issue date of this service
bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within the specified
compliance time after the effective date of this AD.
    (2) If any cracking is found during any inspection required by
this AD, and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A072, dated April
8, 2016, specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate action: Before
further flight,

repair the cracking using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.

(j) Post-Modification and Post-Repair Actions

    For airplanes on which any modification or repair specified in
(g) or (h) of this AD has been done: At the applicable time and
intervals specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A072, dated April 8, 2016, do all
applicable post-modification and post-repair inspections and all
applicable corrective actions; in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A072, dated
April 8, 2016; except as specified in paragraph (i)(2) of this AD.
All applicable corrective actions must be done before further
flight.

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance
with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or
local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (l) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO, to make those findings. To be approved,
the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation
must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval
must specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) Except as required by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD: For
service information that contains steps that are labeled as Required
for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs (k)(4)(i) and
(k)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or sub-step is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then
the RC requirement is removed from that step or sub-step. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.

(l) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Haytham Alaidy,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles ACO,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-
5224; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A072, dated April 8,
2016.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 25, 2016.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-29306 Filed 12-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66697-66698]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26641]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0004; FRL-9402-3]

Access to Confidential Business Information by Science
Applications International Corporation and Its Identified
Subcontractors

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has authorized its contractor, Science Applications
International Corporation (SAIC) of McLean, VA, and its subcontractors
to access information which has been submitted to EPA under all
sections of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Some of the
information may have been claimed or determined to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI).

DATES: Access to the confidential data occurred on or about August 1,
2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For technical information contact: Scott Sherlock, Environmental
Assistance Division (7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this notice apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. This action may,
however, be of interest to all who manufacture, process, or distribute
industrial chemicals. Since other entities may also be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may
be affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0004. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index available at http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPPT
Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) at
Rm. 3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC.
The EPA/DC Public Reading Room hours of operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number of the EPA/DC Public Reading Room is

(202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is (202)
566-0280. Docket visitors are required to show photographic
identification, pass through a metal detector, and sign the EPA visitor
log. All visitor bags are processed through an X-ray machine and
subject to search. Visitors will be provided an EPA/DC badge that must
be visible at all times in the building and returned upon departure.

II. What action is the agency taking?

    Under EPA Contract Number GS-35F-4461G, Order Number EP-G13H-00665,
contractor SAIC of 1701 SAIC Drive, McLean, VA; Essential Software Inc
of 9024 Mistwood Drive, Potomac, MD; and Impact Innovations Systems
Inc., of 9720 Capital Court, Manassas, VA., are assisting EPA by
developing, enhancing, maintaining, and operating a variety of database
applications. They will also assist with interfaces and linkages to
other applications.
    In accordance with 40 CFR 2.306(j), EPA has determined that under
EPA Contract Number GS-35F-4461G, Order Number EP-G13H-00665, SAIC and
its subcontractors required access to CBI submitted to EPA under all
sections of TSCA to perform successfully the duties specified under the
contract. SAIC and its subcontractors' personnel were given access to
information submitted to EPA under all sections of TSCA. Some of the
information may have been claimed or determined to be CBI.
    EPA is issuing this notice to inform all submitters of information
under all sections of TSCA that EPA has provided SAIC and its
subcontractors access to these CBI materials on a need-to-know basis
only. All access to TSCA CBI under this contract is taking place at EPA
Headquarters, in accordance with EPA's TSCA CBI Protection Manual.
    Access to TSCA data, including CBI, will continue until March 26,
2015. If the contract is extended, this access will also continue for
the duration of the extended contract without further notice.
    SAIC and its subcontractors' personnel have signed nondisclosure
agreements and were briefed on appropriate security procedures before
they were permitted access to TSCA CBI.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Confidential business information.

    Dated: October 21, 2013.
Matthew G. Leopard,
Director, Information Management Division, Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2013-26641 Filed 11-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 72 (Wednesday, April 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20233-20235]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08620]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-0001]

Request for Nomination for Industry Representatives and
Participation From Industry Organizations on Public Advisory Committees

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting that any
industry organizations interested in participating in the selection of
nonvoting industry representatives to serve on its public advisory
committees for the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
notify FDA in writing. FDA is also requesting nominations for nonvoting
industry representatives to serve on CDER's public advisory committees.
A nominee may either be self-nominated or nominated by an organization
to serve as a nonvoting industry representative. Nominations will be
accepted for current vacancies effective with this notice.

DATES: Any industry organization interested in participating in the
selection of an appropriate nonvoting member to represent industry
interests must send a letter stating that interest to FDA by May 15,
2015, (see sections I and II of this document for further details).
Concurrently, nomination materials for prospective candidates should be
sent to FDA by May 15, 2015.

ADDRESSES: All statements of interest from interested industry
organizations interested in participating in the selection process of
nonvoting industry representative nominations should be

sent to Cicely Reese (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). All
nominations for nonvoting industry representatives may be submitted
electronically by accessing the FDA Advisory Committee Membership
Nomination Portal at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/FACTRSPortal/FACTRS/index.cfm or by mail to Advisory Committee
Oversight and Management Staff, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 5103, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002.
Information about becoming a member of an FDA advisory committee can
also be obtained by visiting FDA's Web site http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cicely Reese, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, Rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-9001, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Agency intends to add a nonvoting
industry representative to the following advisory committees:

I. CDER Advisory Committees

    A. Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical
Pharmacology: Reviews and evaluates scientific, clinical, and technical
issues related to the safety and effectiveness of drug products for use
in the treatment of a broad spectrum of human diseases.
    B. Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug Products Advisory Committee
(formerly Anesthetic and Life Support Drugs Advisory Committee):
Reviews and evaluates available data concerning the safety and
effectiveness of marketed and investigational human drug products for
use in anesthesiology and surgery.
    C. Anti-Infective Drugs Advisory Committee: Reviews and evaluates
available data concerning the safety and effectiveness of marketed and
investigational human drug products for use in the treatment of
infectious diseases and disorders.
    D. Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee: Reviews and evaluates
available data concerning the safety and effectiveness of marketed and
investigational human drug products for use in the treatment of
acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), HIV-related illnesses, and
other viral, fungal, and mycobacterial infections. (Terminated February
15, 2015).
    E. Arthritis Advisory Committee: Reviews and evaluates available
data concerning the safety and effectiveness of marketed and
investigational human drug products for use in the treatment of
arthritis, rheumatism, and related diseases.
    F. Bone, Reproductive, and Urologic Drugs Advisory Committee
(formerly Advisory Committee for Reproductive Health Drugs): Reviews
and evaluates available data on the safety and effectiveness of
marketed and investigational human drugs for use in the practice of
osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease, obstetrics, gynecology,
urology, and related specialties.
    G. Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee: Reviews and
evaluates available data on the safety and effectiveness of marketed
and investigational human drug products for use in the treatment of
cardiovascular and renal disorders.
    H. Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee: Reviews
and evaluates available data concerning the safety and effectiveness of
marketed and investigational human drug products for use in the
treatment of dermatologic and ophthalmic disorders.
    I. Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee: Reviews and
evaluates information on risk management, risk communication, and
quantitative evaluation of spontaneous reports for drugs for human use.
    J. Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee: Reviews
and evaluates available data concerning the safety and effectiveness of
marketed and investigational human drug products for use in the
treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders.
    K. Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee: Reviews and evaluates
available data concerning the safety and effectiveness of marketed and
investigational human drug products for use in the treatment of
gastrointestinal diseases.
    L. Medical Imaging Drugs Advisory Committee: Reviews and evaluates
available data concerning the safety and effectiveness of marketed and
investigational human drug products for use in diagnostic and
therapeutic procedures using radioactive pharmaceuticals and contrast
media used in diagnostic radiology.
    M. Nonprescription Drugs Advisory Committee: Reviews and evaluates
available data concerning the safety and effectiveness of over-the-
counter (nonprescription) human drug products for use in the treatment
of a broad spectrum of human symptoms and diseases.
    N. Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee: Reviews and evaluates
available data concerning the safety and effectiveness of marketed and
investigational human drug products for use in the treatment of cancer.
    O. Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee:
Reviews and evaluates available data concerning the safety and
effectiveness of marketed and investigational human drug products for
use in the treatment of neurologic diseases.
    P. Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee: Provides advice on
scientific, technical, and medical issues concerning drug compounding.
    Q. Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee: Reviews and
evaluates available data concerning the safety and effectiveness of
marketed and investigational human drug products for use in the
practice of psychiatry and related fields.
    R. Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee: Reviews and
evaluates available data concerning the safety and effectiveness of
marketed and investigational human drug products for use in the
treatment of pulmonary disease and diseases with allergic and/or
immunologic mechanisms.

II. Selection Procedure

    Any industry organization interested in participating in the
selection of an appropriate nonvoting member to represent industry
interests should send a letter stating that interest to the FDA contact
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) within 30 days of publication of
this document (see DATES). Within the subsequent 30 days, FDA will send
a letter to each organization that has expressed an interest, attaching
a complete list of all such organizations and a list of all nominees
along with their current resumes. The letter will also state that it is
the responsibility of the interested organizations to confer with one
another and to select a candidate, within 60 days after the receipt of
the FDA letter, to serve as the nonvoting member to represent industry
interests for the committee. The interested organizations are not bound
by the list of nominees in selecting a candidate. However, if no
individual is selected within 60 days, the Commissioner will select the
nonvoting member to represent industry interests.

III. Application Procedure

    Individuals may self-nominate and/or an organization may nominate
one or more individuals to serve as a nonvoting industry
representative. Contact information, a current curriculum vitae, and
the name of the committee of interest should be sent to the FDA
Advisory Committee Membership Nomination Portal (see ADDRESSES) within
30 days of publication of this

document (see DATES). FDA will forward all nominations to the
organizations expressing interest in participating in the selection
process for the committee. (Persons who nominate themselves as
nonvoting industry representatives will not participate in the
selection process).
    FDA seeks to include the views of women and men, members of all
racial and ethnic groups, and individuals with and without disabilities
on its advisory committees and, therefore, encourages nominations of
appropriately qualified candidates from these groups.
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14, relating to advisory committees.

    Dated: April 9, 2015.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-08620 Filed 4-14-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 163 (Thursday, August 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40187-40188]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17921]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81435/August 18, 2017]

Securities Exchange Act of 1934; Order Scheduling Filing of
Statements on Review in the Matter of the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.
for an Order Granting the Approval of Proposed Rule Change Regarding
the Acquisition of CHX Holdings, Inc. by North America Casin Holdings,
Inc. (File No. SR-CHX-2016-20)

    On December 2, 2016, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change in connection with the
acquisition of CHX Holdings, Inc. by North America Casin Holdings, Inc.
The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal
Register on December 12, 2016.\3\ On January 12, 2017, proceedings were
instituted under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act \4\ to
determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\5\
On June 6, 2017, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,\6\ a
longer period was designated for Commission action on proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\ On August
7, 2017, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change.\8\ On August 9, 2017, the Division of Trading and Markets, for
the Commission pursuant to delegated authority,\9\ approved the
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79474 (December 6,
2016), 81 FR 89543.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79781, 82 FR 6669
(January 19, 2017).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80864, 82 FR 26966
(June 12, 2017).
    \8\ See letter from Albert J. Kim, Vice President and Associate
General Counsel, CHX, dated August 8, 2017, available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-chx-2016-20/chx201620-2198847-160378.pdf.
    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30 3(a)(12).
    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81366, 82 FR 38734
(August 15, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Commission Rule of Practice 431,\11\ the Commission is
reviewing the delegated action and the August 9, 2017 order is stayed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 201.431.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, it is ordered, pursuant to Commission Rule of Practice
431, that by September 17, 2017, any party or

other person may file any additional statement.
    It is further ordered that the August 9, 2017 order approving the
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1 (File No. SR-CHX-
2016-20), shall remain stayed pending further order of the Commission.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
 Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-17921 Filed 8-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 173 (Friday, September 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54888-54889]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21734]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER13-1910-002]

Guzman Power Markets, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding,
of Guzman Power Markets, LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability is September 12, 2013.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 29, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-21734 Filed 9-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15129-15130]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05876]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0878]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office
of Management and Budget Approval; Premarket Notification for a New
Dietary Ingredient

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
collection of information entitled ``Premarket Notification for a New
Dietary Ingredient'' has been approved by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville,
MD 20850<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 25, 2013, the Agency submitted a
proposed collection of information entitled ``Premarket Notification
for a New Dietary Ingredient'' to OMB for review and clearance under 44
U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0330.
The approval expires on February 28, 2015. A copy of the supporting
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: March 12, 2014.
Peter Lurie,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. 2014-05876 Filed 3-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P