[Federal Register: November 14, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 219)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 63997-64000]
[DOCID:fr14no07-14]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0119; FRL-8156-8]

Cyprodinil; Time-Limited Pesticide Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation extends time-limited tolerances for residues
of cyprodinil in or on onion, dry bulb; onion, green; and strawberry.
Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) requested these
tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as
amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA). The
tolerances will expire on December 31, 2009.

DATES: This regulation is effective November 14, 2007. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before January 14, 2008,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0119. To access the
electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced

Search,'' then ``Docket Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where
indicated and select the ``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on
the regulations.gov website to view the docket index or access
available documents. All documents in the docket are listed in the
docket index available in regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov
, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP

Public Docket, in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Stanton, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

 B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?

    In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal
Register document through the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov
, you may access this Federal Register document

electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a

frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the
Government Printing Office's pilot e-CFR site at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr
.

C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?

    Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, as amended by FQPA, any person may
file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request
a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural regulations which
govern the submission of objections and requests for hearings appear in
40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or request a hearing on
this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0119 in the subject line on the first page of
your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or
delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before January 14, 2008.
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0119, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

    In the Federal Register of September 28, 2007 (72 FR 55204-55207)
(FRL-8147-1), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of
FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide
petition (PP 8E5012) by Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4),
500 College Road East, Suite 201 W, Princeton, NJ 08540-6635. The
petition requested that 40 CFR 180.532 be amended by extending the
time-limited tolerances to December 31, 2009 for residues of the
fungicide cyprodinil, 4-cyclopropyl-6-methyl-N-phenyl-2-pyrimidinamine,
in or on onion, dry bulb at 0.60 parts per million (ppm); onion, green
at 4.0 ppm; and strawberry at 5.0 ppm. This notice referenced a summary
of the petition prepared by Syngenta Crop Protection, the registrant,
which is available to the public in the docket, http://www.regulations.gov.
 There were no comments received in response to the

notice of filing.
    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue....''

    EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. For further discussion of the
regulatory requirements of section 408 of FFDCA and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/factsheets/riskassess.htm
.

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to
make a determination on aggregate exposure, consistent with section
408(b)(2) of FFDCA, for a tolerance for residues of cyprodinil on
onion, dry bulb at 0.60 ppm; onion, green at 4.0 ppm; and strawberry at
5.0 ppm.
    In the Federal Register of October 20, 2004 (69 FR 61599-61605,
FRL-7682-1) the Agency published a Final rule establishing tolerances
for residues of cyprodinil in or on almond, hulls; bean, dry; bean,
succulent; and leafy greens subgroup 4A, except spinach. When the
Agency conducted the risk assessments in support of this tolerance
action it assumed that cyprodinil residues would be present on dry bulb
onion, green onion and strawberry as well as on all foods covered by
the proposed and established tolerances. Residues on dry bulb onion,
green onion and strawberry were included because there were existing
time-limited tolerances for these commodities. Therefore, extending the
dry bulb onion, green onion and strawberry tolerances will not change
the most recent estimated aggregate risks resulting from use of
cyprodinil, as discussed in the October 20, 2004 Federal Register,
cited above. Refer to the October 20, 2004 Federal Register document,
cited above, for a detailed discussion of the aggregate risk
assessments and determination of safety. EPA relies upon those risk
assessments and the findings made in the Federal Register document in
support of this action.
    Based on the risk assessment discussed in the final rule published
in the Federal Register of October 20, 2004, cited above, EPA concludes
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the
general population, and to infants and children from aggregate exposure
to cyprodinil residues.

IV. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    Adequate enforcement methodology (high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC)/ultra-violet (UV) Method AG- 631B) is available
to enforce the tolerance expression. The method is substantially
identical to earlier methods (Methods AG-631, AG-631A and REM 141.01)
that have been adequately validated by independent laboratories and the
Agency. The method may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry
Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD
20755-5350; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

B. International Residue Limits

    Codex maximum residue limits (MRLs) have been established for
residues of cyprodinil in or on strawberries at 2 ppm and dry bulb
onions at 0.3 ppm. The Codex MRLs are lower than the time-limited
tolerances in the United States (5.0 ppm on strawberry and 0.6 ppm on
dry bulb onions) in part because of differences in use patterns here
and in Europe. The U.S. tolerances are based on higher seasonal
application rates and/or shorter pre-harvest intervals. The higher U.S.
tolerances also reflect uncertainties in the submitted field trial data
for these crops. To address these uncertainties, EPA required
additional field trials on strawberries and onions as a condition of
registration. The new field trials have been submitted and are
undergoing review at the Agency. In its decision regarding permanent
tolerances for strawberry and dry bulb onions, EPA will consider
international residue limits, including Codex MRLs, and make every
effort to harmonize if possible.

V. Conclusion

    Therefore, these tolerances are extended for residues of
cyprodinil, 4-cyclopropyl-6-methyl-N-phenyl-2-pyrimidinamine, in or on
onion, dry bulb at 0.6 ppm; onion, green at 4.0 ppm; and strawberry at
5.0 ppm.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408(d) of
FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997). This final rule does not contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
    This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000) do not apply to this rule. In addition, This
rule does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note).

VII. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal
Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: November 2, 2007.
Daniel J. Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. Section 180.532 is amended by revising the table in paragraph (a)(2)
to read as follows:

Sec.  180.532  Cyprodinil; tolerances for residues.

    (a) * * *
    (2) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Expiration/
                  Commodity                    Parts per    revocation
                                                million        date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Onion, bulb..................................       0.60        12/31/09
Onion, green.................................        4.0        12/31/09
Strawberry...................................        5.0        12/31/09
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-22233 Filed 11-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 116 (Monday, June 17, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28044-28045]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12765]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9995-20-Region 10]

Reissuance of NPDES General Permit for Offshore Seafood
Processors in Alaska (AKG524000)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Reissuance of final NPDES General Permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Director of the Water Division, EPA Region 10, is
reissuing a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
General Permit to Offshore Seafood Processors in Alaska. The General
Permit authorizes discharges of seafood processing waste from
facilities (also referred to as ``vessels'') that discharge at least 3
nautical miles (NM) or greater from the Alaska shore as delineated by
mean lower low water (MLLW) or a closure line; and which engage in the
processing of fresh, frozen, canned, smoked, salted or pickled seafood,
the processing of mince, or the processing of meal, paste and other
secondary by-products.

DATES: The issuance date of the General Permit is June 17, 2019. The
General Permit will become effective July 17, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the General Permit and Response to Comments are
available upon request at the following address: USEPA Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue, Suite 155, WD-19-C04, Seattle, WA 98101-3188. Electronic
requests may be mailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Permit documents may be found on the
EPA Region 10 website at: https://www.epa.gov/npdes-permits/npdes-general-permit-offshore-seafood-processors-alaska. Copies of the
general permit, Fact Sheet and Response to Comments are also available
upon request. Requests may be made to Audrey Washington at (206) 553-
0523 or to Joseph Ziobro at<PHONE_NUMBER>. Requests may also be
electronically mailed to: [email protected], or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

    There are currently fewer than 100 permitted seafood processors
that discharge effluent and operate more than 3 NM from the Alaskan
shore or closure line. Most of the seafood processed on the vessels are
pollock and Pacific cod. Other species have included sablefish,
arrowtooth flounder, Pacific

hake, jack mackerel, Alaska plaice, Pacific Ocean perch, rockfish,
sculpin, lumpsucker, skate, sole, Greenland turbot, bairdi, opilio, and
king crab. The permit authorizes the discharge of seafood processing
wastes that are mostly waste solids (shell, bones, skin, scales, flesh
and organs), blood, body fluids, slime, oils and fats from cooking and
rendering operations; disinfectants; and miscellaneous wastewaters.
This Permit does not authorize the discharge of pollutants from any
shore-based facilities, nor any pollutants from vessels transporting
seafood processing waste solely for the purpose of dumping materials
into ocean waters. The median annual waste discharged from a vessel in
2014 and 2015 was 7.1 and 6.2 million pounds, respectively.
    Facilities will receive a written notification from the EPA whether
permit coverage and authorization to discharge under the general permit
is approved.
    The draft Permit, Fact Sheet, Ocean Discharge Criteria Evaluation,
and associated Permit forms were made available for a 45-day public
comment from March 25, 2019 to May 9, 2019. The EPA received comments
from the At-Sea Processors Association, the Groundfish Forum, and the
Freezer Longline Coalition. As a result of comments, the EPA modified
Section V.B.4 of the permit to reduce the number of representative
pictures required quarterly from four to at least one. The EPA prepared
a Response to Comment document, which is available on EPA's website at:
https://www.epa.gov/npdes-permits/npdes-general-permit-offshore-seafood-processors-alaska.
    The EPA has prepared a Biological Evaluation for this Permit
action. Consultations under the Endangered Species Act between the EPA
and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) have been completed. The
EPA has not yet completed consultation with NMFS. On June 1, 2019, NMFS
provided the EPA with an excerpt from their Draft Incidental Take
Statement for the Biological Opinion (BO) on EPA's Proposed Reissuance
of General Permit AKG524000 for Offshore Seafood Processors in Alaska,
which included draft Reasonable and Prudent Measures (RPMs). NMFS
indicated to the EPA that, while the agency would not be able to issue
a final BO prior to Permit issuance, their final BO will include final
RPMs for the Western Distinct Population Segment Steller Sea Lions (DPS
SSLs). As such, the EPA has incorporated the draft RPMs from NMFS as
final permit conditions, resulting in changes to the Daily Sea Surface
Visual Monitoring Requirements and a change to an Effluent Limitation
Requirement. The Sea Surface Visual Monitoring Requirements in Section
VI.C. of the Permit have been modified to include a required Steller
sea lion visual monitoring program for any vessel discharging unground
waste. The Effluent Limitation Requirement at V.A.3. has been modified
to require that in all waters west of 144[deg] West longitude, the
discharge of any unground waste must cease whenever Steller sea lion(s)
are present within 250 meters in any direction of the vessel(s).
    The EPA is issuing the final permit pending completion of ESA
consultation, consistent with Section 7(d) of the Endangered Species
Act. The EPA does not believe that issuing this permit pending the
completion of consultation poses interim risks of concern to Western
DPS SSLs, and if further consultation with NMFS were to reveal new
information that the EPA determines warrants modification to the permit
to protect listed species or critical habitat, the EPA has authority to
take appropriate action to modify the permit pursuant to 40 CFR
122.62(a)(2).

II. Other Legal Requirements

    This action is not significant and was therefore not submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under Executive
Orders 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review.

    Dated: June 7, 2019.
Angela Chung,
Associate Director, Water Division, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2019-12765 Filed 6-14-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 162 (Tuesday, August 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51668-51669]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18078]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-10109-01-OMS]

Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision
Approval, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) approval of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)
request to revise/modify certain of its EPA-authorized programs to
allow electronic reporting.

DATES: EPA approves the authorized program revisions/modifications as
of August 23, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shirley M. Miller, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Information Management, Mail Stop 2824T,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media
Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) was published in the Federal
Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR.
CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory
alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure
that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper
counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local
government agencies that receive, or wish to begin receiving,
electronic reports under their EPA-authorized programs must apply to
EPA for a revision or modification of those programs and obtain EPA
approval. Subpart D provides standards for such approvals based on
consideration of the electronic document receiving systems

that the state, tribe, or local government will use to implement the
electronic reporting. Additionally, Sec.  3.1000(b) through (e) of 40
CFR part 3, subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions
and modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the
option of the state, tribe or local government in place of procedures
available under existing program-specific authorization regulations. An
application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the
state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to
implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered
by the application and will use electronic document receiving systems
that meet the applicable subpart D requirements.
    On June 2, 2022, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
(TCEQ) submitted an application titled National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Electronic Reporting Tool (NeT) for
revisions/modifications to its EPA-approved programs under title 40 CFR
to allow new electronic reporting. EPA reviewed TCEQ's request to
revise/modify its EPA-authorized programs and, based on this review,
EPA determined that the application met the standards for approval of
authorized program revisions/modifications set out in 40 CFR part 3,
subpart D. In accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice of EPA's
decision to approve TCEQ's request to revise/modify its following EPA-
authorized programs to allow electronic reporting under 40 CFR is being
published in the Federal Register:

Part 123: EPA-Administered Permit Programs: the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Reporting under 40 CFR 122 and 125
Part 403: General Pretreatment Regulations for Existing and New Sources
of Pollution Reporting under 40 CFR 403
Part 501: State Sludge Management Program Regulations Reporting under
40 CFR 503

    TCEQ was notified of EPA's determination to approve its application
with respect to the authorized programs listed above.

    Dated: August 17, 2022.
Jennifer Campbell,
Director, Office of Information Management.
[FR Doc. 2022-18078 Filed 8-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P