PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request US EPA / Office of Research and Development / National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory 2. OMB control number b. G None a 2080 0068 3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. G New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c.

Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one)

a.

Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes

No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a.

Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify:

7. Title: Health Effects of Microbial Pathogens in Recreational Waters; National Epidemiological and Environmental Assessment of Recreational ( NEEAR) Water Study ( Renewal)

8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) EPA ICR Number 2081.02 9. Keywords: Recreational water monitoring, rapid methods, NEEAR Water Study, Beaches Act, Coastal Health Act, Beaches Action Plan, waterborne illness 10. Abstract: This study will be conducted, and the information collected, by the Epidemiology and Biomarkers Branch, Human Studies Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). Participation of adults and children in this collection of information is strictly voluntary. This information is being collected as part of a research program consistent with the Section 3( a) ( v) ( 1) of the Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal Health Act of 2000 and the strategic plan for EPA's Office of Research and Development ( ORD) and the Office of Water entitled " Action Plan for Beaches and Recreational Water." The Beaches Act and ORD's strategic plan have identified research on effects of microbial pathogens in recreational waters as a high priority research area with particular emphasis on developing new water quality indicator guidelines for recreational waters. EPA has broad legislative authority to establish water quality criteria and to conduct research to support these criteria. This data collection is for a series of epidemiological studies to evaluate exposure to and effects of microbial pathogens in marine and fresh ( Great Lakes) recreational waters as part of EPA's research program on exposure and health effects of microbial pathogens in recreational waters. The results of these health effects studies will be used to document human health effects associated with recreational water use and correlate these health effects with ongoing EPA studies to identify a new generation of indicators for detection of human pathogens in recreational water and appropriate, effective, and expeditious testing methods for these indicators ( addressed separately under Section 3( a) ( v) ( 2 & 3) of the Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal Health Act of 2000). The results will be used to develop mathematical relationships that will be used for the generation of new national water quality guidelines and appropriate monitoring guidelines.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X")

a. P Individuals or households d. Farms b. Business or other for profit e. Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. X State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X")

a. P Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. G Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 7,000 b. Total annual responses 14,000 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 100% c. Total hours requested 5,250 d. Current OMB inventory 5,000 e. Difference 250 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 0 2. Adjustment 250 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars)

a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs 0 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) 0 c. Total annualized cost requested 0 d. Current OMB inventory 0 e. Difference 0 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change 0 2. Adjustment 0 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. P Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. __ Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. Q Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. X Reporting 1. Q On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. Q Semi annually 6. Q Annually 7. Q Biannually 8.

Other ( describe) twice on day of beach visit and once 10 12 days later.

17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Yes G No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Elizabeth Sams Phone: 919 843 3161 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( I) Why the information is being collected' ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( I) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Oscar Morales, Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Environmental Information Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95 Certification Requirement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions 5 CFR 1320.9 reads " As part of the agency submission to OMB of a proposed collection of information, the agency ( through the head of the agency, the Senior Official or their designee) shall certify ( and provide a record supporting such certification) that the proposed collection of information

"( a) is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including that the information to be collected will have practical utility;

"( b) is not unnecessarily duplicative of information otherwise reasonably accessible to the agency;

"( c) reduces to the extent practicable and appropriate the burden on persons who shall provide information to or for the agency, including with respect to small entities, as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U. S. C § 601( 6)), the use of such techniques as:

"( 1) establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to those who are to respond; "( 2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting requirements; or collection of information , or any part thereof; "( 3) an exemption from coverage of the collection of information, or any part thereof;

"( d) is written using plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology and is understandable to those who are to respond;

"( e) is to be implemented in ways consistent and compatible, to the maximum extent practicable, with the existing reporting and recordkeeping practices of those who are to respond;

"( f) indicates for each recordkeeping requirement the length of time persons are required to maintain the records specified;

"( g) informs potential respondents of the information called for under § 1320.8( b)( 3); [ see below]

"( h) has been developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected, including the processing of the information in a manner which shall enhance, where appropriate, the utility of the information to agencies and the public;

"( I) uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology appropriate to the purpose for which the information is to be collected; and "( j) to the maximum extent practicable, uses appropriate information technology to reduce burden and improve data quality, agency efficiency and responsiveness to the public."

NOTE: 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3) requires that each collection of information:

"( 3) informs and provides reasonable notice to the potential persons to whom the collection of information is addressed of: "( I) the reasons the information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( ii) the way such information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( iii) an estimate, to the extent practicable, of the average burden of the collection ( together with a request that the public direct to the agency any comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden); "( iv) whether responses to the collection of information are voluntary, required to obtain or retain a benefit ( citing authority), or mandatory ( citing authority); "( v) the nature and extent of confidentiality to be provided, if any ( citing authority); and "( vi) the fact that any agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number."

OMB 83 I ( Instructions) 10/ 95


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 84 (Thursday, May 1, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 24763]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09971]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. IC-31030]

Notice of Applications for Deregistration Under Section 8(f) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940

April 25, 2014.
    The following is a notice of applications for deregistration under
section 8(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for the month of
April 2014. A copy of each application may be obtained via the
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. An order granting each
application will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested
persons may request a hearing on any application by writing to the
SEC's Secretary at the address below and serving the relevant applicant
with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on May 20, 2014, and should
be accompanied by proof of service on the applicant, in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests
should state the nature of the writer's interest, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by writing to the Secretary, U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-1090.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane L. Titus at<PHONE_NUMBER>, SEC,
Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-8010.

Vanguard Florida Tax-Free Funds [File No. 811-6709]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. Applicant transferred its assets to Vanguard
Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund, a series of Vanguard Municipal Bond Funds,
and on July 26, 2013, made a distribution to its shareholders based on
net asset value. Expenses of approximately $28,356 incurred in
connection with the reorganization were paid by applicant.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on March 31, 2014.
    Applicant's Address: P.O. Box 876, Valley Forge, PA 19482.

2010 Swift Mandatory Common Exchange Security Trust [File No. 811-
22506]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On April 8,
2014, applicant made a final liquidating distribution to its
shareholders, based on net asset value. Applicant incurred no expenses
in connection with the liquidation.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on April 10, 2014.
    Applicant's Address: c/o U.S. Bank National Association, Corporate
Trust Services, Attention: 2010 Swift Mandatory Common Exchange
Security Trust, 101 N 1st Avenue, Suite 1600, Phoenix, AZ 85003.

Empire State Municipal Exempt Trust [File No. 811-2838]

    Summary: Applicant, a unit investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On April 2,
2013, applicant made a final liquidating distribution to its
unitholders, based on net asset value. Applicant incurred no expenses
in connection with the liquidation.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on April 8, 2014.
    Applicant's Address: 546 Fifth Ave., New York, NY 10036.

Advantage Advisers Whistler Fund, LLC [File No. 811-9425]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On December
31, 2013, applicant transferred its assets and liabilities to a
Delaware liquidating trust, based on net asset value. Each member of
applicant has received a pro rata beneficial interest in the
liquidating trust based on the capital account percentage in applicant
held by such member as of December 31, 2013. Expenses of $75,000
incurred in connection with the liquidation were paid by applicant.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on January 23, 2014, and
amended on April 4, 2014.
    Applicant's Address: 85 Broad St., 24th Floor, New York, NY 10004.

Endowment Fund, Inc. [File No. 811-21723]

Endowment Institutional TEI Fund, LP [File No. 811-22639]

    Summary: Each applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an
order declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company.
Applicants have never made a public offering of their securities and do
not propose to make a public offering or engage in business of any
kind.
    Filing Date: The applications were filed on April 9, 2014.
    Applicants' Address: 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027.

Mint Group 8 [File No. 811-4190-01]

    Summary: Applicant, a unit investment trust, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On December
21, 2012, applicant made its final liquidating distribution to its
unitholders, based on net asset value. Applicant incurred no expenses
in connection with the liquidation.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on March 6, 2013, and
amended on April 8, 2014.
    Applicant's Address: 6 East 43rd St., New York, NY 10017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-09971 Filed 4-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


	                UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

	         DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

	                 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

	                         WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on March 17, 2003

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST 2003-14697

________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________

This serves as interim notice to the public of the action described
below, taken orally by the Department official indicated (no confirming
order will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:  Volga-Dnepr J.S. Cargo Airline					Date Filed:  March 13,
2003

Relief requested:  Exemption from 49 U.S.C. 40109(g) to operate one
one-way emergency cabotage cargo flight from North Island, CA, to
Denver, CO, to transport outsized cargo consisting of one Centaur III
Launch Vehicle Upper Stage and associated equipment, on or about March
19, 2003, using AN-124 aircraft, on behalf of Lockheed Martin
Astronautics.  The applicant stated that Lockheed Martin needed urgent
delivery of the equipment in order to complete an aggressive final
assembly schedule in time to meet subsequent scheduled shipment to Cape
Canaveral for fabrication and launch integraton activities; that the
cargo is too large for transportation on U.S.-carrier aircraft; and that
surface transportation was not feasible because of the time involved,
the delicate nature and high value of the cargo, and conditions
unsuitable to maintaining system integrity compliance.

Applicant representative:  Glenn Wicks<PHONE_NUMBER>		DOT Analyst:
Barbara Schools<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings: The applicant served its application on those U.S.
carriers operating large all-cargo aircraft.  Each carrier indicated
that it did not have aircraft available to conduct the proposed
operation, and that it had no comment or did not oppose grant of the
requested authority.

Statutory Standards:  Under 49 U.S.C. §40109(g), we may authorize a
foreign air carrier to transport commercial traffic between U.S. points
(i.e., cabotage traffic) only under limited circumstances.
Specifically, we must find that the authority is in the public interest;
that because of an emergency created by unusual circumstances not
arising in the normal course of business, U.S. air carriers holding
certificates under 49 U.S.C. §41102 cannot accommodate the traffic
involved; that all possible efforts have been made to accommodate the
traffic by using the resources of U.S. carriers; and that the authority
is necessary to avoid unreasonable hardship to the traffic involved (an
additional required finding, concerning emergency transportation during
labor disputes, was not relevant here).  For examples of earlier grants
of authority of this type, see, e.g., Order 2001-5-23.

	DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved							Action date:  March 17, 2003

Effective dates of authority granted:  March 19-21, 2003

Basis for approval:  We found that our action was consistent with all
the relevant criteria of 49 U.S.C. 40109(g) for the grant of an
exemption of this type, and that the grant of this authority was
required in the public interest.  Specifically, we were persuaded that
the need to move the cargo promptly in order to complete the assembly
and meet integration and launch deadlines, the fact that the cargo could
not be transported by surface in time to meet that schedule or without
risk of damage, the potential negative impact of delivery delays, and
the unique, outsized nature of the cargo, constituted an emergency not
arising in the normal course of business.  Moreover, based on the
representations of the U.S. carriers, we concluded that no U.S. carrier
had aircraft available which could be used to conduct the operation at
issue here.  We also found that grant of this authority would prevent
unreasonable hardship to the cargo and Lockheed Martin.  Finally, we
found that the applicant was qualified to perform its proposed operation
(see, e.g., Order 94-10-13).

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to our
standard exemption conditions (attached), and to the condition that
VolgaDnepr comply with an FAA-approved flight routing for the authorized
flight, and with any requisite Department of Defense authorizations.

Action taken by:	Read C. Van de Water

			Assistant Secretary for Aviation

			  and International Affairs

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at: http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

												       Appendix A

FOREIGN AIR CARRIER CONDITIONS OF AUTHORITY

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the holder shall:

(1)  Not conduct any operations unless it holds a currently effective
authorization from its homeland for such operations, and it has filed a
copy of such authorization with the Department;

(2)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration, including, but not limited to, 14 CFR Parts 129, 91, and
36, and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning
security;1

(3)  Comply with the requirements for minimum insurance coverage
contained in 14 CFR Part 205, and, prior to the commencement of any
operations under this authority, file evidence of such coverage, in the
form of a completed OST Form 6411, with the Federal Aviation
Administration’s Program Management Branch (AFS-260), Flight Standards
Service (any changes to, or termination of, insurance also shall be
filed with that office);

(4)  Not operate aircraft under this authority unless it complies with
operational safety requirements at least equivalent to Annex 6 of the
Chicago Convention;

(5)  Conform to the airworthiness and airman competency requirements of
its Government for international air services;

(6)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 203,
concerning waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(7)  Agree that operations under this authority constitute a waiver of
sovereign immunity, for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1605(a), but only with
respect to those actions or proceedings instituted against it in any
court or other tribunal in the United States that are:

   (a)  based on its operations in international air transportation
that, according to the contract of carriage, include a point in the
United States as a point of origin, point of destination, or agreed
stopping place, or for which the contract of carriage was purchased in
the United States; or

   (b)  based on a claim under any international agreement or treaty
cognizable in any court or other tribunal of the United States.

In this condition, the term "international air transportation" means
"international transportation" as defined by the Warsaw Convention,
except that all States shall be considered to be High Contracting
Parties for the purpose of this definition;

(8)  Except as specifically authorized by the Department, originate or
terminate all flights to/from the United States in its homeland;

(9)  Comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 217, concerning the
reporting of scheduled, nonscheduled, and charter data;

(10) If charter operations are authorized, except as otherwise provided
in the applicable aviation agreement, comply with the Department's rules
governing charters (including 14 CFR Parts 212 and 380); and

(11) Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department, with all applicable orders or regulations of other U.S.
agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the United States.

This authority shall not be effective during any period when the holder
is not in compliance with the conditions imposed above.  Moreover, this
authority cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without explicit
Department approval under Title 49 of the U.S. Code (formerly the
Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended).

__________________

1  To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, the holder should, before commencing any new
service (including charter flights) from a foreign airport that would be
the holder’s last point of departure for the United States, inform its
Principal Security Inspector of its plans.

U.S. Department of Transportation

Office of the Secretary of Transportation						        (41301/40109)
10/2002


[Federal Register: December 29, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 248)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 68692-68697]
[DOCID:fr29de09-12]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 70

[EPA-R07-OAR-2008-0895; FRL-9096-6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Operating
Permits Program; State of Iowa

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
Iowa State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Iowa Operating Permits Program
submitted by the State on November 18, 2008. The purpose of these
revisions is to update existing air quality rules; make corrections,
clarifications and improvements; add information with regard to control
of fugitive dust; clarify the opacity limit for incinerators; update
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting requirements;
and add rules for temporary operation of small generators during
periods of disaster. EPA is approving the SIP provisions pursuant to
section 110 of the CAA. EPA is approving the state operating permits
revisions pursuant to section 502 of the CAA and implementing
regulations.

DATES: This direct final rule will be effective March 1, 2010, without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by January 28,
2010. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing
the public that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2008-0895, by one of the following methods:
    1. http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Tracey Casburn, Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street,
Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-
2008-0895. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch,
901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m. excluding Federal holidays. The interested persons wanting to
examine these documents should make an appointment with the office at
least 24 hours in advance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tracey Casburn at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
by e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. What Part 52 revisions is EPA approving?
    A. Definition Changes
    B. Construction Permit Exemption for Temporary Operation of
Small Generators in Disaster Situations
    C. Addition of PSD Amendments
    D. Addition of PSD Administrative Rule
    E. Special Requirements for Major Stationary Sources Located in
Areas Designated Attainment or Unclassified
    F. Changes to Permit Exemption Requirements for New or Existing
Sources
    G. Amendment of Emissions Standards and Measurement
    H. Modification of Notification Requirements for Portable Plant
Relocations
    I. Addition of Vehicle Speed Control as a Preventative Measure
for Fugitive Dust
    J. Clarification of Incinerator Provision
    K. Cross Reference Connection to the Construction Permits Rule
III. What Part 70 revisions is EPA approving?
    A. Update to Incorporate the Date for EPA Reference Method
    B. Clarification of Title V Permit Application Provisions
    C. Issuance of Multiple Title V Permits
    D. Correction of Errors
IV. What revisions is EPA not taking action on?
V. What action is EPA taking?
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What is being addressed in this document?

    The State has revised Chapters 20, 21, 22, 23, 25 and 33 of the
State air pollution control rules promulgated by the State's
Environmental Protection Commission. EPA is approving the revisions
described below for the reasons discussed in this document.

II. What Part 52 revisions is EPA approving?

A. Definition Changes

    In Iowa (IA) Rule 567-20.2 and 567-33.3(1) the mailing addresses of
the ``American Society of Mechanical Engineers,'' or ASME, and the
``American Society for Testing and Materials,'' or ASTM, are being
removed. The ``EPA Reference Method'' definition is being revised to
update the amended dates of several appendices as described under 40
CFR part 60 (Appendices A, B, C and F), 40 CFR part 61 (Appendix B), 40
CFR part 63 (Appendix A) and 40 CFR part 75 (Appendix A, B, F and K).
The definition of ``volatile organic compound'' was updated to reflect
recent Federal amendments to exclude the compound HF-7300 from the list
of compounds that contribute to tropospheric ozone formation. EPA is
approving these revisions as they are administrative in nature and do
not alter the stringency of the SIP.

B. Construction Permit Exemption for Temporary Operation of Small
Generators in Disaster Situations

    The State added a new rule, IA Rule 567-21.6, to allow utilities to
temporarily operate (generally for no more than 10 days) small
generators for electricity generation during periods of natural and
man-made disasters. The rule defines the term ``disaster'' by reference
to the term as specified in the Iowa State Code section 29C.2(1). An
owner or operator may install and operate a generator under this rule
with or without a gubernatorial or Federal disaster proclamation. The
State submitted technical support documentation demonstrating that the
exemption would not result in interference with attainment and
maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). EPA
reviewed that documentation and found it to be a reasonable
representation of the expected emissions. EPA agrees with the State's
demonstration that the emergency generator exemption will not limit the
State's ability to maintain compliance with the NAAQS. The
documentation submitted by the State is included in the docket for this
action.

C. Addition of PSD Amendments

    The State revised its rules, IA Rules 567-33.3(17) and 567-
33.3(18), to address the reopening of the public comment period if
substantial new issues are raised during the initial public comment
period. These revisions clarified the public participation procedures
by allowing for the reopening of the public comment period when
necessary. These provisions add clarity for those applying for PSD
permits and for those seeking to comment on draft PSD permits.
Provisions were also added (paragraphs ``c'' and ``d'' of IA Rule 567-
33.3(18)) to clarify that a source owner or operator is subject to
enforcement action if a source is not constructed according to its PSD
application and the PSD permit, and if a source owner or operator does
not obtain the required PSD permit prior to construction. These
revisions also clarified the time period allowed for commencing and
completing construction on PSD projects. EPA is approving these
clarifications as they are consistent with the Federal PSD rules in 40
CFR 51.166.

D. Addition of PSD Administrative Rule

    The State adopted a new PSD subrule, IA Rule 567-33.3(21), to add
provisions for administrative amendments such as typographical errors,
word processing errors, or changes in the name, address, or telephone
number of any person identified in the permit. This provision adds
clarity for those applying for administrative amendments to PSD
permits. EPA is approving this revision as it is administrative in
nature and does not alter the stringency of the SIP.

E. Special Requirements for Major Stationary Sources Located in Areas
Designated Attainment or Unclassified

    The State made revisions to a section of IA Rule 567-22.4 that
applies to special requirements for major stationary sources located in
areas designated attainment or unclassified (PSD). The change was made
to cross-reference from this section of the rule to the chapter
containing the State's PSD rules. EPA is approving this revision as it
is administrative in nature and does not alter the stringency of the
SIP.

F. Changes To Permit Exemption Requirements for New or Existing Sources

    The State made several changes to IA Rules 567-22.1(2)``r'', 567-
22.1(2)``w''(6), 567-22.1(2)``aa,'' and 567-22.1(2)``nn''. The State
added information to a minor source (non-PSD) construction permit
exemption clarifying that an internal combustion engine with a brake
horsepower rating of less than 400 measured at the shaft may be subject
to the new source performance standard (NSPS) for stationary
compression ignition internal combustion engines (as set forth in 40
CFR Part 60). The revision further states that using the exemption does
not relieve the owner or operator from any obligation to comply with
the NSPS requirements.
    The State also corrected an error in the ``small unit'' exemption
provisions. The existing subparagraph (numbered paragraph 8)
incorrectly lists the threshold for a ``substantial small unit'' for
``any combination of hazardous air pollutants'' as 9.375 tons per year.
The amendment corrects the threshold to 3.75 tons per year.
    Two corrections were made to construction permit exemptions. The
first correction, IA Rule 567-22.1(2)``aa,'' clarifies that the
exemption for pretreatment application processes that use aqueous-based
chemistries (wash booths) applies to all pretreatment wash processes
using aqueous-based chemistries and not just processes preparing a
substrate for an organic coating. The second correction, IA Rule 567-
22.1(2)``nn,'' applies to emissions from agricultural and construction
internal combustion engines that are operated only for repair or
maintenance purposes at non-major equipment repair shops or equipment
dealerships. The amendment adds ``emissions from over-the-road truck
internal combustion engines'' to the description of emissions covered
under this exemption. This exemption was inadvertently excluded from
the list of mobile source equipment types included in the original
rulemaking. EPA is approving these revisions as they are administrative
in nature and do not alter the stringency of the SIP.

G. Amendment of Emissions Standards and Measurement

    In IA Rule 567-23.1(6)``a''(2) and 567-25.1(9) revisions were made
to amend the methods and procedures for stack sampling and associated
analytical methods to include the most recent date of Federally-
approved revisions and corrected the symbol for ``good engineering
practice stack height.'' EPA is approving these clarifications as they
are consistent with the Federal rules.

H. Modification of Notification Requirements for Portable Plant
Relocations

    An amendment to IA Rule 567-22.3(3)``f'' reduces the notification
requirement for portable plant relocations (facilities which have been
previously permitted and are minor sources) from 30 days prior to
relocation to 14 days prior to relocation. This change will allow more
flexibility for owners and operators at portable plants, while still
allowing sufficient time for the Iowa Department of Natural Resources
to conduct air quality inspections at these portable plants. This
revision does not apply to facility relocations located in non-
attainment areas or areas that are maintenance for the NAAQS. The
notification requirement remains at 30 days for those relocations. EPA
is approving this revision as it is administrative in nature and does
not alter the stringency of the SIP.

I. Addition of Vehicle Speed Control as a Preventative Measure for
Fugitive Dust

    A new provision was added to IA Rule 23.3(2)``c''(1) for the
control of fugitive dust to include ``vehicle speed control'' as a
reasonable precaution to control the discharge of visible emissions of
fugitive dust beyond the lot line of property on which emissions are
generated. Fugitive dust generated from a road or other surface used
for vehicle movement is greatly influenced by the speed of a vehicle on
the surface and reducing the allowable speed is a reasonable method to
help control the discharge of visible fugitive dust emissions. EPA is
approving this

revision as it does not alter the stringency of the SIP.

J. Clarification of Incinerator Provision

    In IA Rule 567-23.4(12), the State clarified the visible emissions
(opacity) limit for incinerators. The limit is 40 percent and the rules
are intended to allow incinerators to exhibit no greater than 60
percent opacity in the case of an operation breakdown or the cleaning
of control equipment for specified periods of time. The amendment
clarifies that this 60 percent opacity limit applies in such instances.
The amendment also includes minor editorial changes. EPA approves this
revision solely because it corrects an error in the prior rule which
allowed sources to emit above 60 percent opacity during breakdown or
cleaning of control equipment.

K. Cross Reference Connection to the Construction Permits Rule

    IA Rule 567-22.207(1) was amended to correct the cross reference to
subrule 567-22.105(1) which includes the ``duty to apply'' provisions
for the Title V Operating Permits Program. EPA is approving this
revision as it is administrative in nature and does not alter the
stringency of the SIP.

III. What Part 70 revisions is EPA approving?

A. Update To Incorporate the Date for EPA Reference Method

    In IA Rule 567-22.100 the state amended the definition of ``EPA
reference method'' to reflect Federal amendments to EPA reference
methods. EPA is approving this revision as it is consistent with
Federal requirements.

B. Clarification of Title V Permit Application Provisions

    Several revisions were made to IA Rule 547-22.105(1)``a'' except
(9), 567-22.110, and 567-22.116(2) in the Iowa Operating Permits
Program. The ``duty to apply'' was revised to provide a better
description of application forms for the Title V facility owners or
operators who must submit timely applications, revisions and
notifications. The term ``off-permit revision'' was added in another
section of the Operating Permits Program that is sometimes used to
refer to a change at a Title V source that does not require a revision
to the current Title V permit. One sentence was removed from subrule
22.116(2). This sentence required testing to be completed prior to the
submission of an application for a Title V permit. This sentence is no
longer needed because the State has established procedures, such as
compliance plan requirements, to address compliance testing. EPA is
approving these revisions as they are administrative in nature and do
not alter the stringency of the State's Operating Permits Program.

C. Issuance of Multiple Title V Permits

    The State added a subrule, IA Rule 567-22.105(5), that allows a
source to obtain more than one Title V permit under certain
circumstances. The appropriateness of this approach will be reviewed by
the State prior to issuance. EPA is approving this revision as it is
consistent with Federal requirements and does not alter the stringency
of the Operating Permits Program.

D. Correction of Errors

    The State added a subrule, IA Rule 567-22.106(8), that requires
owners or operators to submit revised forms as soon as possible after
an error is discovered, or upon notification of an error by the State,
in a Title V emissions inventory or Title V fee payment. EPA is
approving this revision as it is consistent with Federal requirements
and does not alter the stringency of the Operating Permits Program.

IV. What revisions is EPA not taking action on?

    The State's submittal included revisions to certain parts of the
Acid Rain Program to include the most recent revisions of Federally-
approved rulemakings. EPA is taking no action on the provisions related
to the Acid Rain Program because the State's Acid Rain rules are not
part of the State's SIP or Title V program.
    The State added a provision to portions of IA Rule 567-21.1(3),
567-21.1(4), 567-22.1(3), 567-22.105(1)``a''(9), and 567-22.106(3)``b''
to allow for the submittal of emissions inventory information and new
or modified construction permit applications (unless a conditional
permit is required) in an electronic format. EPA is not acting on any
provision allowing electronic submittal of information. In order for
EPA to approve provisions that allow for the electronic submittal of
information, the State must seek and obtain approval from EPA of its
electronic document receiving system consistent with the Cross-Media
Electronic Reporting Rule found at 40 CFR Part 3.

V. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is approving the request to amend the Iowa SIP and the Iowa
Operating Permits Program. The revisions pertain to routine updates,
corrections, clarifications and improvements as listed previously in
this document. These modifications will not adversely affect air
quality and will not relax the SIP. The State has provided adequate
justification where certain revisions could result in emissions
increases. EPA is not taking action on the revisions to the Acid Rain
Program or the revisions pertaining to ``electronic submittal.''
    The State submittal has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submittal also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
revisions meet the substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including
section 110 and implementing regulations. These revisions are also
consistent with applicable EPA requirements in Title V of the CAA and
40 CFR part 70.
    EPA is processing this action as a direct final action because the
revisions make routine changes to the existing rules which are
noncontroversial. Therefore, we do not anticipate any adverse comments.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on part of this rule
and if that part can be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may
adopt as final those parts of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under State law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also
does not have Federalism implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This
action merely approves a State rule implementing a Federal standard,
and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the CAA. This rule also is not subject
to Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of Children from Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because
it approves a State rule implementing a Federal standard.
    In reviewing State submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to
disapprove a State submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA when it reviews a State
submission, to use VCS in place of a State submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by March 1, 2010. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to
file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed
rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of
today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for
judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw
this direct final rule and address the comment in the final rulemaking.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

40 CFR Part 70

    Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control,
Intergovernmental relations, Operating permits, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 15, 2009.
William Rice,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.

0
Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart Q--Iowa

0
2. In Sec.  52.820(c) the table is amended by:
0
a. Revising the entries for 567-20.2, 567-22.1, 567-22.3, 567-22.4,
567-22.207, 567-23.1, 567-23.3, 567-23.4, 567-25.1, and 567-33.3; and
0
b. Adding in numerical order an entry for 567-21.6.
    The revisions and addition read as follows:

Sec.  52.820   Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                          EPA-Approved Iowa Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               State
         Iowa citation                    Title           effective date   EPA approval date      Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Iowa Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Commission [567]

                        Chapter 20--Scope of Title--Definitions--Forms--Rules of Practice
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
567-20.2......................  Definitions.............        10/15/08  12/29/09 [insert    The definitions
                                                                           FR page number      for anaerobic
                                                                           where the           lagoon, odor,
                                                                           document begins].   odorous
                                                                                substance,
                                                                                odorous substance
                                                                                and greenhouse
                                                                                gas are not SIP
                                                                                approved.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Chapter 21--Compliance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
567-21.6......................  Temporary Electricity           10/15/08  12/29/09 [insert    ..................
                                 Generation for Disaster                   FR page number
                                 Situations.                               where the
                                                                           document begins].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Chapter 22--Controlling Pollution
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
567-22.1......................  Permits required for New         6/11/08  12/29/09 [insert    Electronic
                                 or Existing Stationary                    FR page number      submittal
                                 Sources.                                  where the           referred to in
                                                                           document begins].   22.1(3) is not
                                                                                SIP approved.

                                                  * * * * * * *
567-22.3......................  Issuing Permits.........        10/15/08  12/29/09 [insert    ..................
                                                                           FR page number
                                                                           where the
                                                                           document begins].
567-22.4......................  Special Requirements for         6/11/08  12/29/09 [insert    ..................
                                 Major Stationary                          FR page number
                                 Sources Located in                        where the
                                 Areas Designated                          document begins].
                                 Attainment or
                                 Unclassified (PSD).

                                                  * * * * * * *
567-22.207....................  Relation to Construction        10/15/08  12/29/09 [insert    ..................
                                 Permits.                                  FR page number
                                                                           where the
                                                                           document begins].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 Chapter 23--Emission Standards for Contaminants
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
567-23.1......................  Emission Standards......         6/11/08  12/29/09 [insert    Subrules 23.1(2)-
                                                                           FR page number      (5) are not SIP
                                                                           where the           approved.
                                                                           document begins].

                                                  * * * * * * *
567-23.3......................  Specific Contaminants...         6/11/08  12/29/09 [insert    Subrule 23.3(3)
                                                                           FR page number      ``d'' is not SIP
                                                                           where the           approved.
                                                                           document begins].
567-23.4......................  Specific Processes......         6/11/08  12/29/09 [insert    Subrule 23.4(10)
                                                                           FR page number      is not SIP
                                                                           where the           approved.
                                                                           document begins].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Chapter 25--Measurement of Emissions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
567-25.1......................  Testing and Sampling of         10/15/08  12/29/09 [insert    ..................
                                 New and Existing                          FR page number
                                 Equipment.                                where the
                                                                           document begins].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 33--Special Regulations and Construction Permit Requirements for Major Stationary Sources--Prevention of
                                 Significant Deterioration (PSD) of Air Quality
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
567-33.3......................  Special construction            10/15/08  12/29/09 [insert    ..................
                                 permit requirements for                   FR page number
                                 major stationary                          where the
                                 sources in areas                          document begins].
                                 designated attainment
                                 or unclassified (PSD).

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

PART 70--[AMENDED]

0
3. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
4. Appendix A to part 70 is amended by adding paragraph (k) under Iowa
to read as follows:

Appendix A to Part 70--Approval Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Program

* * * * *

Iowa

* * * * *

    (k) The Iowa Department of Natural Resources submitted for
program approval rules 567-22.100, 567-22.105(1)``a'', except
subparagraph (9); new subrules 567-22.105(5) and 567-22.106(8); 567-
22.110, and 567-22.116 on November 18, 2008. The state effective
dates were October 15, 2008. These revisions to the Iowa program are
approved effective March 1, 2010.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-30775 Filed 12-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 93 (Wednesday, May 14, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27488-27489]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10971]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2014-0192]

Special Local Regulation; Annual Marine Events on the Colorado
River, between Davis Dam (Bullhead City, AZ) and Headgate Dam (Parker,
AZ) Within the San Diego Captain of the Port Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the 37th Annual Parker, AZ Tube
Float marine event and associated waterway restriction special local
regulations on June 7, 2014. This event occurs in the navigable waters
of the Colorado River in Parker, Arizona, covering six miles from the
La Paz County Park to the Headgate Dam. These special local regulations
are necessary to provide for

the safety of the participants, crew, spectators, and general users of
the waterway. During the enforcement period, persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within
this regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, or
his designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. on June 7, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice,
call or email Petty Officer Giacomo Terrizzi, Waterways Management,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego, CA; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the special
local regulations in 33 CFR 100.1102 in support of the annual Parker
Tube Float, formerly known as the Great Western Tube Float (Item 9 on
Table 1 of 33 CFR 100.1102), held on a Saturday in June. The Coast
Guard will enforce the special local regulations on the Colorado River
in Parker, AZ on Saturday June 7, 2014 from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Under the provisions of 33 CFR 100.1102, persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within
this regulated area of the Colorado River unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, or his designated representative. The Coast Guard
may be assisted by other Federal, State, or local law enforcement
agencies in enforcing this regulation.
    This notice is issued under authority of 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 33 CFR
100.1102. In addition to this notice in the Federal Register, the Coast
Guard will provide the maritime community with advance notification of
this enforcement period via the Local Notice to Mariners and local
advertising by the event sponsor.
    If the Captain of the Port Sector San Diego or his designated
representative determines that the regulated area need not be enforced
for the full duration stated on this notice, he or she may use a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners or other communications coordinated with
the event sponsor to grant general permission to enter the regulated
area.

    Dated: April 2, 2014.
S.M. Mahoney,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2014-10971 Filed 5-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 38153]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16051]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 704

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0572; FRL-9929-70]

Chemical Substances When Manufactured or Processed as Nanoscale
Materials, TSCA Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Extension of
Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA published a proposed rule in the Federal Register of April
6, 2015 at 80 FR 18330, concerning proposing reporting and
recordkeeping requirements for certain chemical substances when they
are manufactured or processed at the nanoscale. This document extends
the comment period for 30 days, from July 6, 2015 to August 5, 2015. A
commenter requested additional time to submit written comments for the
proposed rule. EPA is therefore extending the comment period in order
to give all interested persons the opportunity to comment fully.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPPT-2010-0572, must be received on or before August 5, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES in
the Federal Register document of April 6, 2015 (80 FR 18330) (FRL-9920-
90).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact: Jim
Alwood, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document extends the public comment
period established in the Federal Register document of April 6, 2015
(80 FR 18330) (FRL-9920-90). In that document, EPA proposed reporting
and recordkeeping requirements for certain chemical substances when
they are manufactured or processed at the nanoscale. EPA is hereby
extending the comment period, which was set to end on July 6, 2015, to
August 5, 2015.
    To submit comments, or access the docket, please follow the
detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES in the Federal Register
document of April 6, 2015. If you have questions, consult the technical
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2607(a).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 704

    Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous substances,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: June 23, 2015.
Maria J. Doa,
Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2015-16051 Filed 7-1-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGION 8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1595 Wynkoop Street
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Denver, CO   80202-1129
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.epa.gov/region080

Ref:  8P-AR

Ms. Minnie Grant
Air Coordinator, Energy, Minerals, & Air
Energy and Minerals Department, Ute Indian Tribe
P.O. Box 70
Fort Duchesne, Utah 84026

Dear Ms. Grant:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8 is proposing to issue a synthetic minor permit for the KGH Operating Company (KGH), State 28-13 Oil and Natural Gas Production Facility on the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation. As requested by KGH, this permit is only intended to establish requested enforceable emissions restrictions for existing installed and operating emissions units and an associated voluntarily installed and operated control device. KGH requested legally and practically enforceable requirements for the installation and operation of a flare to control the volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from produced natural gas from a heater treater separator and flashing, working and breathing loss emissions from crude oil and produced water storage tanks. This permit would not authorize the construction of any new emissions sources, or emissions increases from existing units, nor would it otherwise authorize any other physical modifications to the facility or its operations.  This permit is only intended to incorporate requested emission limits and provisions from the permit application for existing emissions units operating at the facility.

A public comment period for the proposed permit will begin on August 1, 2018, and end on August 31, 2018.

We have enclosed a paper copy containing the proposed permit and supporting documentation, and we ask that you please make this material available for public review until the end of the public comment period. In addition, we have provided copies of the bulletin board public notice announcement and would appreciate it if you could post this announcement in prominent locations in your area. All of these documents will also be available for review in electronic format on our website at: https://www.epa.gov/caa-permitting/caa-permit-public-comment-opportunities-region-8.

If you have any questions concerning the enclosed proposed permit or technical support documents, please contact Colin Schwartz, of my staff, at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

						Sincerely,

						Monica Mathews-Morales
                              Director, Air Program
                                    Office of Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance

Enclosures (3)

cc:  Bruce Pargeets, Director, Energy, Minerals and Air, Ute Indian Tribe


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 215 (Monday, November 7, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 78085-78088]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26521]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA- 2016-9305; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-073-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2012-22-
12, for all Airbus Model A330-243, -243F, -341, -342, and -343
airplanes. AD 2012-22-12 currently requires inspecting piccolo tubes,
piccolo tube mount links, the aft side of the forward bulkhead, and
outer boundary angles (OBAs) for cracks, fractures, and broken links,
and doing corrective actions if necessary. Since we issued AD 2012-22-
12, we have received reports of loose and missing attachment rivets of
the inner boundary angles (IBA) and OBA of the forward bulkhead. This
proposed AD would retain certain requirements of AD 2012-22-12, and add
repetitive inspections for pulled, loose, and missing attachment rivets
of the IBA and OBA of the forward bulkhead, and related investigative
and corrective actions if necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect
and correct degraded structural integrity of the engine nose cowl,
which in the case of forward bulkhead damage in conjunction with a
broken piccolo tube, could lead to damage to the engine and operation
in icing conditions with reduced thermal anti-ice (TAI) performance.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 22,
2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For Airbus service information identified in this NPRM, contact
Airbus SAS--Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com.
    For Rolls-Royce service information identified in this NPRM,
contact Rolls-Royce Plc, Technical Publications, P.O. Box 31, Derby,
DE24 8BJ, United Kingdom; telephone 44 (0) 1332 245882; fax 44 (0) 1332
249936; Internet http://www.Rolls-Royce.com.
    You may view this referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-
227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9305; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-9305;
Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-073-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On October 26, 2012, we issued AD 2012-22-12, Amendment 39-17248
(77 FR 67263, November 9, 2012) (``AD 2012-22-12''). AD 2012-22-12
requires actions intended to address an unsafe condition on all Airbus
Model 330-243, -243F, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes.
    Since we issued AD 2012-22-12, we have received reports of loose or
missing attachment rivets of the IBA and OBA of the forward bulkhead.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive, 2016-0086R1, dated May 13, 2016 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus Model 330-
243, -243F, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes. The MCAI states:
    During shop visit, cracks were found in several primary
structural parts of Rolls Royce (RR) Trent 700 engine air intake
cowls, specifically in the forward bulkhead web, web stiffeners and
outer boundary angles (OBA). In addition, several attachment links
were found severely worn, and some became detached. In two cases,
the thermal anti-ice (TAI) piccolo tube was found fractured.
Investigation results show that the cracks are most likely due to
acoustic excitation and vibration.
    A broken piccolo tube, if not detected and corrected, in
conjunction with forward air intake cowl bulkhead damage, could lead
to in-flight detachment of the outer barrel, possibly resulting in
damage to the engine or reduced control of the aeroplane.
    To address this potential unsafe condition, Airbus issued
Service Bulletin (SB) A330-71-3025, making reference to RR SB
RB.211-71-AG416, to provide inspection instructions, and, depending
on findings, accomplishment of applicable corrective action(s).
    Consequently, EASA issued AD 2011-0062 [http://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2011_0062_superseded.pdf/AD_2011-0062_1] [which corresponds to FAA AD 2012-22-12] to require
repetitive special detailed inspections (SDI) [borescope] of the
piccolo tube and affected mount links, the aft side of forward
bulkhead, inner boundary angles (IBA) and OBA of the RR Trent 700
air intake cowl assemblies, and, depending on findings,
accomplishment of applicable corrective action(s).
    Since EASA AD 2011-0062 was issued, some occurrences were
reported of finding attachment rivets of the IBA and OBA either
pulled, loose, or missing during inspection. It was determined that
the affected IBA and OBA rivets may not have been previously
inspected if operators accomplished the required inspection in
accordance with the instructions of RR SB RB.211-71-AG416 at
original issue.

    To address this potentially missed inspection, Airbus published
SB A330-71-3033, providing instructions for a one-time detailed
inspection of the IBA and OBA attachment rivets, to be accomplished
if the previous inspection was accomplished using the instructions
of RR SB RB.211-71-AG416 at original issue. Airbus also published SB
A330-71-3025 Revision 2, adding an inspection of the IBA and OBA
attachment rivets, to be used if the previous inspection was
accomplished using RR SB RB.211-71-AG416 at issue 1 or later. Airbus
also published SB A330-71-3032 to introduce a modification (mod)
that would eliminate the need for repetitive inspections.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD partially
retains the requirements of EASA AD 2011-0062, which is superseded,
and requires an additional [special] detailed inspection [borescope]
of IBA and OBA forward bulkhead attachment rivets. This [EASA] AD
also introduces an optional terminating action (Airbus mod 204615,
embodied in production, which can be embodied in service with Airbus
SB A330-71-3032) for the repetitive inspections required by this
[EASA] AD.
    This [EASA] AD is revised to improve clarity, including Airbus
and RR SB references and inserting Notes to identify the Part
Numbers (P/N) of the affected engine air intake nose cowl
assemblies.

    Related investigative actions include inspecting for cracked or
fractured piccolo tubes and for broken piccolo tube links. Corrective
actions include replacing the engine air intake cowl assembly and
repair of pulled, loose, or missing rivets.
    The compliance times for the related investigative and corrective
actions range from before further flight to within 100 flight cycles,
depending on the findings of the inspections.
    The repetitive inspection interval for the IBA, OBA, and forward
bulkhead varies depending on inspection findings, and ranges between
200 and 5,000 flight cycles. The repetitive inspection interval for the
piccolo tubes and links is 2,500 flight cycles.
    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9305.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A330-71-3025, Revision 02,
including Appendices 01 and 02, dated December 9, 2015. This service
information describes procedures for doing inspections of the piccolo
tube and mount links, the aft side of the forward bulkhead, the IBA,
OBA, and the forward bulkhead on the engine air intake cowl assemblies;
and related investigative and corrective actions.
    Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A330-71-3032, dated December 10,
2014. This service information describes procedures for doing a
modification that improves the air intake primary structure and adds a
new piccolo tube supporting structure on the engine air intake cowl
assemblies.
    Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A330-71-3033, dated December 14,
2015. This service information describes procedures for doing an
inspection for pulled, loose, and missing attachment rivets of the IBA
and OBA of the forward bulkhead of the forward bulkhead, and corrective
actions.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 47 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
               Action                        Labor cost           Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections (new proposed action)...  12 work-hours x $85 per              $0       $1,020 per      $47,940 per
                                       hour = $1,020 per                            inspection       inspection
                                       inspection cycle.                                 cycle           cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                      Estimated Costs for Optional Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Action                            Labor cost              Parts cost        Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification..........................  Up to 142 work-hours x $85                [1]   Up to $12,070.
                                         per hour = $12,070.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide material cost estimates for the optional
  actions specified in this proposed AD.

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs that
would be required based on the results of the proposed inspection. We
have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these
repairs:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                  Action                                Labor cost                 Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repairs...................................  16 work-hours x $85 per hour =                 [2]           $1,360
                                             $1,360.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2] We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide material cost estimates for the on-
  condition actions specified in this proposed AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2012-22-12, Amendment 39-17248 (77 FR 67263, November 9, 2012), and
adding the following new AD: Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2016-9305;
Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-073-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by December 22, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2012-22-12, Amendment 39-17248 (77 FR 67263,
November 9, 2012) (``AD 2012-22-12'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus Model A330-243, -243F, -341, -342, and
-343 airplanes, certificated in any category, all serial numbers.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 71, Powerplant.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracking of air intake cowls
on Rolls-Royce Trent engines, worn and detached attachment links,
and fractured thermal anti-ice (TAI) piccolo tubes, and loose, or
missing attachment rivets of the inner boundary angles (IBA) and the
outer boundary angles (OBA) of the forward bulkhead. We are issuing
this AD to detect and correct degraded structural integrity of the
engine nose cowl, which in the case of forward bulkhead damage in
conjunction with a broken piccolo tube, could lead to damage to the
engine and operation in icing conditions with reduced thermal anti-
ice (TAI) performance.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Affected Engine Air Intake Nose Cowl Assemblies

    The engine air intake nose cowl assemblies affected by this AD
have part number (P/N) SJ30020, P/N SJ30361, P/N SJ30687, P/N
SJ30810, and P/N SJ30811, as specified in Rolls-Royce Service
Bulletin RB.211-71-H205, dated July 7, 2014.
    (1) The engine air intake nose cowl assemblies having P/N
SJ30020, P/N SJ30361, and P/N SJ30687 can be modified (reworked and
re-identified as P/N SJ30810 (for P/N SJ30020, P/N SJ30361) and P/N
SJ30811 (for P/N SJ30687)), as specified in Rolls-Royce Service
Bulletin RB.211-71-H205, dated July 7, 2014.
    (2) The engine air intake nose cowl assemblies having P/N
SJ30810 and P/N SJ30811 can be modified (reworked and re-identified
as P/N SJ30820 and P/N SJ30821, respectively), as specified in
Rolls-Royce Service Bulletin RB.211-71-H847, dated December 2, 2014.

(h) Inspections, Related Investigative Actions, and Corrective Actions

    For airplanes in pre-Airbus Modification 204615 and pre-Airbus
Service Bulletin A330-71-3032 configuration: At the applicable times
specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, do a special
detailed inspection of the piccolo tube and affected mount links,
the aft side of the forward bulkhead, and the IBA and OBA of the
affected engine air intake cowl assemblies specified in paragraph
(g) of this AD; and do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions; in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-71-3025, Revision 02,
including Appendices 01 and 02, dated December 9, 2015, except as
required by paragraph (i) of this AD. Do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions at the applicable time
specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Airbus Service
Bulletin A330-71-3025, Revision 02, including Appendices 01 and 02,
dated December 9, 2015. Repeat the inspections of the piccolo tube
and affected mount links, the aft side of the forward bulkhead, and
the IBA and OBA of the engine air intake cowl assemblies thereafter
at the applicable intervals specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-71-3025, Revision
02, including Appendices 01 and 02, dated December 9, 2015.
Accomplishment of corrective actions does not constitute terminating
action for the repetitive inspections required by this paragraph.
    (1) For any engine air intake cowl assembly that has accumulated
fewer than 5,000 flight cycles since its first installation on an
airplane as of the effective date of this AD: Inspect within 24
months after the engine air intake cowl assembly has accumulated
5,000 total flight cycles.
    (2) For any engine air intake cowl assembly that has accumulated
5,000 or more flight cycles since its first installation on an
airplane as of the effective date of this AD: Inspect within 24
months after the effective date of this AD.

 (i) Service Information Exception

    Where Airbus Service Bulletin A330-71-3025, Revision 02,
including Appendices 01 and 02, dated December 9, 2015, specifies to
contact Bombardier Aerospace-Shorts for instructions, before further
flight, repair using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA).

(j) Optional Terminating Action

    Modification of an airplane in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-71-3032,
dated December 10, 2014, constitutes terminating action for the
repetitive inspections required by paragraph (h) of this AD for the
modified airplane only.

 (k) Parts Installation Limitation

    As of the effective date of this AD, any pre-Airbus modification
204615 part may be installed on any airplane provided that, at

the earlier of the applicable times specified in paragraphs (h)(1)
and (h)(2) of this AD following installation, the actions required
by paragraph (h) of this AD have been accomplished on the pre-Airbus
Modification 204615 part.

 (l) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(h) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin A330-71-3025, dated
January 10, 2011; or Airbus Service Bulletin A330-71-3025, Revision
01, dated October 24, 2012; provided that, within 1,050 flight
cycles after the effective date of this AD, a special detailed
inspection for pulled, loose, and missing attachment rivets of the
IBA and OBA of the forward bulkhead is accomplished; and all
applicable corrective actions are done; in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-71-3033,
dated December 14, 2015. Do all applicable corrective actions before
further flight. Accomplishment of corrective actions does not
constitute terminating action for the repetitive inspections
required by paragraph (h) of this AD.

 (m) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information
may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (i) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
    (ii) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with 2012-22-12 are
not approved as AMOCs with this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any service information
contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.

(n) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2016-0086R1, dated May 13, 2016,
for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2016-9305.
    (2) For Airbus service information identified in this AD,
contact Airbus SAS--Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.airbus.com.
    (3) For Rolls-Royce service information identified in this AD,
contact Rolls-Royce Plc, Technical Publications, P.O. Box 31, Derby,
DE24 8BJ, United Kingdom; telephone 44 (0) 1332 245882; fax 44 (0)
1332 249936; Internet http://www.Rolls-Royce.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 28, 2016.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.

[FR Doc. 2016-26521 Filed 11-4-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P