[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 31 (Thursday, February 14, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 4055]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02341]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2905-033]

Village of Enosburg Falls; Municipal Water and Light Department;
Notice of Comment Period Extension

    On November 8, 2018, the Village of Enosburg Falls, Vermont held a
public meeting and site visit in support of the re-licensing process
for the Enosburg Falls Hydroelectric Project No. 2905. Pursuant to 18
CFR 16.8(b)(5), participants must file comments within 60 days of the
public meeting. Due to the funding lapse at certain federal agencies
between December 22, 2018 and January 25, 2019, the Commission is
extending the comment period to February 12, 2019.

    Dated: February 8, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-02341 Filed 2-13-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 172 (Friday, September 4, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53465-53467]
[FR Doc No: 2015-21953]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2015-0823]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone, Labor Day Long Neck Style Fireworks, Indian River
Bay; Long Neck, DE

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
waters of Indian River Bay in Long Neck, DE. The safety zone will
restrict vessel traffic on a portion of Indian River Bay from operating
while a fireworks event is taking place. This temporary safety zone is
necessary to protect the surrounding public and vessels from the
hazards associated with a fireworks display.

DATES: This rule is effective from 8:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on September
6, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2015-0823]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email If you have questions on this temporary rule, call or
email Lieutenant Brennan Dougherty, U.S. Coast Guard, Sector Delaware
Bay, Chief Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard; telephone
(215)271-4851, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
COTP Captain of the Port

A. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this final rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule as publishing an NPRM is impracticable given
that the final details for this event were not received by the Coast
Guard until August 18, 2015, and this event is scheduled for September
6, 2015.
    For similar reasons, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal Register.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish regulated navigation areas and other limited access areas: 33
U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 160.5; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
    The purpose of this safety zone is to protect mariners and
spectators from the hazards associated with the fireworks display, such
as accidental discharge of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and
falling hot embers or other debris.

C. Discussion of the Final Rule

    To mitigate the risks associated with the Labor Day Long Neck Style
Fireworks Display, the Captain of the Port, Delaware Bay is
establishing a temporary safety zone in the vicinity of the launch
site. The safety zone will encompass all waters of Indian River Bay
within a 230 Yard radius of the fireworks launch platform in
approximate position 38[deg]36'35.8'' N., 075[deg]09'04.4'' W. in Long
Neck, DE. The safety zone will be effective and enforced from 8:00 p.m.
until 10:00 p.m. on September 6, 2015. Entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within the safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Delaware Bay, or his on-scene representative. The
Captain of the Port, Delaware Bay, or his on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF channel 16.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. Although this regulation
will restrict access to the regulated area, the effect of this rule
will not be significant because: the Coast Guard will make extensive
notification of the Safety Zone to the maritime public via maritime
advisories so mariners can alter their plans accordingly, vessels may
still be permitted to transit through the safety

zone with the permission of the Captain of the Port on a case-by-case
basis, and this rule will be enforced for only the duration of the
fireworks display.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
intending to anchor or transit along a portion of Indian River Bay in
Long Neck, DE from 8:00 p.m. until 10:00 p.m. on September 6, 2015,
unless cancelled earlier by the Captain of the Port once all operations
are completed.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the reasons stated under
paragraph D.1., Regulatory Planning and Review.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves implementation of regulations within 33
CFR part 165, applicable to safety zones on the navigable waterways.
This zone will temporarily restrict vessel traffic from transiting the
Indian River Bay along the shoreline of Long Neck, Delaware, in order
to protect the safety of life and property on the waters for the
duration of the fireworks display. This rule is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination
are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek
any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T05-0823 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T05-0823  Safety Zone, Labor Day Long Neck Style Fireworks,
Indian River Bay; Long Neck, DE.

    (a) Regulated area. The following area is a safety zone: all waters
of Indian River Bay within a 230 yard radius of the fireworks launch
platform in approximate position 38[deg]36'35.8'' N., 075[deg]09'04.4''
W. in Long Neck, DE.
    (b) Regulations. The general safety zone regulations found in
subpart C of this part apply to the safety zone created by this
section.
    (1) All persons or vessels wishing to transit through the Safety
Zone must request authorization to do so from the Captain of the Port
or his designated representative one hour prior to the intended time of
transit.
    (2) Vessels granted permission to transit must do so in accordance
with the directions provided by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative to the vessel.
    (3) To seek permission to transit the Safety Zone, the Captain of
the Port's representative can be contacted via marine radio VHF Channel
16.
    (4) This section applies to all vessels wishing to transit through
the safety zone except vessels that are engaged in the following
operations:
    (i) Enforcing laws;
    (ii) Servicing aids to navigation; and
    (iii) Emergency response vessels.
    (5) No person or vessel may enter or remain in a safety zone
without the permission of the Captain of the Port;
    (6) Each person and vessel in a safety zone shall obey any
direction or order of the Captain of the Port.
    (c) Definitions. (1) Captain of the Port means the Commander, Coast
Guard Sector Delaware Bay, or any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port to act
on his behalf.
    (2) Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Delaware Bay, to assist in enforcing the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
    (d) Enforcement officials. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted by
Federal, State, and local agencies in the patrol and enforcement of the
zone.
    (e) Enforcement period. This safety zone will be effective from
8:00 p.m. until 10:00 p.m. on September 6, 2015, unless cancelled
earlier by the Captain of the Port.

B.A. Cooper,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Delaware Bay.
[FR Doc. 2015-21953 Filed 9-3-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: October 7, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 194)]
[Notices]
[Page 58761-58762]
[DOCID:fr07oc05-143]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-52524; No. SR-DTC-2005-10]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Depository Trust Company;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to
Clarify Procedures Relating to the Destruction of Certain Non-
Transferable Securities Certificates That Are Held in DTC's Internal
Removal Account Known as PREM

September 28, 2005.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 18, 2005, The Depository Trust Company (``DTC'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed
rule change described in Items I, II, and III below, which items have
been prepared primarily by DTC. DTC has filed the proposal pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(1)
thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the rule change from interested parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The purpose of this rule filing is to clarify certain procedures
with respect to an earlier filing submitted by DTC and approved by the
Commission that allowed DTC to destroy certain non-transferable
securities certificates.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, DTC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. DTC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A),
(B, and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of these statements.

(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    The purpose of this rule filing is to clarify certain procedures
pertaining to the previously approved File No. SR-DTC-2003-09.\5\ In
File No. SR-DTC-2003-09, DTC proposed a new service designed to allow
DTC to destroy certain certificates representing positions in
securities for which transfer agent services are no longer available
(``non-transferable certificates''). At the time of the original
filing, DTC held 1.2 million such certificates, representing nearly 22%
of DTC's entire certificate inventory. DTC instituted the Destruction
of Non-Transferable Securities Certificates Program (``Program'') in
order to eliminate the significant risks and costs associated with the
ongoing maintenance of custody, control, and audit of these non-
transferable certificates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49930 (June 28, 2004),
69 FR 41003 (July 7, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Prior to instituting the Program, many participants used DTC's
Position Removal (``PREM'') function to have positions in issues of
non-transferable certificates moved from their participant accounts to
a DTC internal PREM account. However, the certificates representing
those positions were still held in DTC's vaults with all the risks and
costs associated with storing such certificates, maintaining the
related accounts, and monitoring the status of such issues. Under the
Program, DTC extended the PREM process by indicating that using PREM to
move a position constituted an acknowledgement by the participant that
DTC could cease crediting the security to the participant's securities
account and that DTC could at its optionand based upon its own criteria
include the certificates underlying the position in a certificate
destruction program.
    In File No. DTC-2003-09, DTC indicated that it would implement the
Program ``beginning first with issues in which all participant
positions have been put in PREM.'' However, the Commission's approval
order of File No. DTC-2003-09 stated that ``DTC will implement this new
program with issues in which all participant positions have been moved
to PREM.'' DTC's intent in the original filing was to start the Program
with fully PREMed issues but to thereafter continue with those issues
which had not been fully PREMed. The purpose of the present filing is
to clarify this point and to make clear that DTC did not in File No.
DTC-2003-09 intend that in the future it would be a prerequisite for
the destruction of a particular issue of non-transferable certificates
that every participant must have moved their respective positions in
that issue to a PREM account. DTC wishes to make clear that it may
destroy any non-transferable certificates for which the positions have
been PREMed even if all participants have not yet moved their positions
into PREM. DTC will maintain a certificate or certificates representing
those positions that have not yet been entered into PREM. DTC has no
intention of clarifying or modifying any other part of File No. DTC-
2003-09 with this filing.
    DTC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to DTC because the change is designed to
facilitate the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions, including the transfer of record ownership,
and the safeguarding of securities and funds.

(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    DTC does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, in the public interest, and for
the protection of investors.

(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were not and are not intended to be solicited with
respect to the proposed rule change, and none have been received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing proposed rule change has become effective upon filing
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act \6\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(1)
\7\ thereunder because it constitutes a stated policy, practice, or
interpretation with respect to the meaning, administration, or
enforcement of an existing rule. At any time within sixty days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public

interest, the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
) or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-DTC-2005-10 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-9303. All submissions should refer to File Number
SR-DTC-2005-10. This file number should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission
will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent

amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public
Reference Section, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of
such filings also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of DTC and on DTC's Web site at http://www.DTCC.com.

All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions.
    You should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-DTC-2005-10
and should be submitted on or before October 28, 2005.

    For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E5-5524 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 24, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 17154]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08217]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL19-63-000]

Office of the People's Counsel for the District of Columbia,
Delaware Division of the Public Advocate, Citizens Utility Board,
Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor, Maryland Office of
People's Counsel, Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate, West
Virginia Consumer Advocate Division, and PJM Industrial Customer
Coalition v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice of Complaint

    Take notice that on April 15, 2019, pursuant to Rule 206 and 212 of
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 and 385.212, Office of the
People's Counsel for the District of Columbia, Delaware Division of the
Public Advocate, Citizens Utility Board, Indiana Office of Utility
Consumer Counselor, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Pennsylvania
Office of Consumer Advocate, West Virginia Consumer Advocate Division,
and PJM Industrial Customer Coalition (collectively, the Joint Consumer
Advocates or Complainants) filed a formal complaint against PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C., (Respondent) alleging that the current market
seller offer cap that Respondent uses in its Reliability Price Model
Base Residual Auction is unjust and unreasonable, all as more fully
explained in the complaint.
    The Complainants states that copies of the complaint were served on
representatives of the Respondent.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
``eSubscription'' link on the website that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
[email protected], or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 6, 2019.

    Dated: April 17, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-08217 Filed 4-23-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P