[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 10 (Friday, January 15, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2136-2140]
[FR Doc No: 2016-00571]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2012-959; FRL-9941-14-Region 9]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Sacramento
Metropolitan Air Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing a
partial approval and partial disapproval of revisions to the Sacramento
Metropolitan (Metro) Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD or
District) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP).
These revisions concern the District's demonstration regarding
Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) requirements for the
1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). We are
proposing action on a local SIP revision under the Clean Air Act (CAA
or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow
with a final action.

DATES: Any comments must arrive by February 16, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2012-959 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4122<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What documents did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of these documents?
    C. What is the purpose of the RACT SIP submissions?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Proposed Action
    A. How is the EPA evaluating the RACT SIP submissions?
    B. Do the RACT SIP submissions meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. What are the RACT deficiencies?
    D. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the RACT SIP.
    E. Proposed Action and Public Comment
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What documents did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the documents addressed by this proposal with the
dates that they were adopted by the local air agency and submitted to
the EPA by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).

                                          Table 1--Submitted Documents
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Local agency                               Document                     Adopted        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SMAQMD.................................  Reasonably Available Control Technology        10/26/06        07/11/07
                                          (RACT) as Applicable to the 8-Hour
                                          Ozone Standard, dated October 26, 2006
                                          (``2006 RACT SIP'').

SMAQMD.................................  Reasonably Available Control Technology        10/23/08         1/21/09
                                          (RACT) Update as Applicable to the 8-
                                          Hour Ozone Standard, dated October 23,
                                          2008 (``Updated RACT SIP'').
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The 2006 RACT SIP and Updated RACT SIP became complete by operation
of law under CAA section 110(k)(1)(B) on January 11, 2008 and July 21,
2009, respectively.

B. Are there other versions of these documents?

    There are no previous versions of these documents in the SMAQMD
portion of the California SIP.

C. What is the purpose of the RACT SIP submissions?

    Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides
(NOX) help produce ground-level ozone and smog, which harm
human health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires
States to submit regulations that control VOC and NOX
emissions. Sections 182(b)(2) and (f) require that SIPs for ozone
nonattainment areas classified as moderate or above implement RACT for
any source covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document
and any major stationary source of VOCs or NOX. The
Sacramento Metro area is subject to this requirement as it is
designated and classified as a severe ozone nonattainment area for the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 40 CFR 81.305; 69 FR 23858 at 23887 (April 30,
2004) (final rule designating and classifying Sacramento Metro area as
serious nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS); 75 FR 24409
(May 5, 2010) (final rule reclassifying the Sacramento Metro area as
severe-15 nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS). Therefore,
the SMAQMD must, at a minimum, adopt RACT-level controls for all
sources covered by a CTG document and for all major non-CTG sources of
VOCs or NOX within the Sacramento Metro nonattainment area.
Any stationary source that emits or has a potential to emit at least 25
tons per year (tpy) of VOCs or NOX is a major stationary
source in a severe ozone nonattainment area (CAA section 182(d) and
(f)).
    Section IV.G. of the preamble to the EPA's final rule to implement
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS (70 FR 71612, November 29, 2005) discusses
RACT requirements. It states in part that where a RACT SIP is required,
States implementing the 8-hour standard generally must assure that RACT
is met either through a certification that previously required RACT
controls represent RACT for 8-hour implementation purposes or through a
new RACT determination. The submitted documents provide SMAQMD's
analyses of its compliance with the CAA section 182 RACT requirements
for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The EPA's technical support documents
(TSDs)(``2006 RACT SIP TSD'' and ``RACT SIP Update TSD'') have more
information about the District's submissions and the EPA's evaluations
thereof.

II. The EPA's Evaluation and Proposed Action

A. How is the EPA evaluating the RACT SIP submissions?

    SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not
interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section
110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in
nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions
reductions (see CAA section 193). Generally, SIP rules must require
RACT for each category of sources covered by a CTG document as well as
each major source of NOX or VOCs in ozone nonattainment
areas classified as moderate or above (see CAA section 182(b)(2)). The
SMAQMD regulates a severe ozone nonattainment area (see 40 CFR 81.305),
so the District's rules must implement RACT.
    Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate
enforceability and CAA section 182 RACT SIPs include the following:

    1. ``Final Rule to Implement the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standard--Phase 2'' (70 FR 71612; November 29, 2005).
    2. ``State Implementation Plans, General Preamble for the
Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990''
(57 FR 13498; April 16, 1992).
    3. Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies,
and Deviations: Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987
Federal Register, May 25, 1988, Revised January 11, 1990, U.S. EPA,
Air Quality Management Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards (``The Blue Book'').
    4. Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC and Other Rule
Deficiencies, August 21, 2001, U.S. EPA Region IX (the ``Little
Bluebook'').
    5. ``State Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to
the General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean
Air Act Amendments of 1990'' (57 FR 55620, November 25, 1992) (``the
NOX Supplement'').
    6. RACT SIPs, Letter dated March 9, 2006 from EPA Region IX
(Andrew Steckel) to CARB (Kurt Karperos) describing Region IX's
understanding of what constitutes a minimally acceptable RACT SIP.
    7. Memorandum from William T. Harnett to Regional Air Division
Directors, (May 18, 2006), ``RACT Qs & As--Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACT) Questions and Answers''.
    8. RACT SIPs, Letter dated April 4, 2006 from EPA Region IX
(Andrew Steckel) to CARB (Kurt Karperos) listing EPA's current CTGs,
ACTs, and other documents which may help to establish RACT.

    With respect to major stationary sources, because the Sacramento
Metro nonattainment area was classified as ``serious'' nonattainment
for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS at the time that California submitted
the 2006 RACT SIP to the EPA, the EPA evaluated this submission in
accordance with the 50 ton per year (tpy) threshold for ``major
stationary sources'' of VOC or NOX emissions in serious
ozone nonattainment areas. CAA section 182(c) and (f). The SMAQMD's
Updated RACT SIP contains the District's RACT evaluation for additional
major stationary sources based upon the 25 tpy major source threshold
in severe ozone nonattainment areas (see CAA section 182(d) and (f)),
which the EPA evaluated for compliance with the additional RACT
requirements that became applicable following the EPA's
reclassification of the Sacramento Metro area from ``serious'' to
``severe'' nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. See 69 FR
23858 at 23887 (April 30, 2004) (final rule designating and classifying
the Sacramento Metro area as serious nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS) and 75 FR 24409 (May 5, 2010) (final rule reclassifying
the Sacramento Metro area as severe-15 nonattainment for the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS).

B. Do the RACT SIP submissions meet the evaluation criteria?

    The 2006 RACT SIP and Updated RACT SIP provide the District's

conclusion that the applicable SIP for the Sacramento Metro area
satisfies CAA section 182 RACT requirements for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. This conclusion is based on the District's analyses of SIP-
approved requirements that apply to: (1) CTG source categories; (2)
certain non-CTG source categories or emission units located at major
stationary sources; and (3) all major stationary sources of VOC or
NOX emissions. See 2006 RACT SIP Staff Report at Appendices
A-D and Updated RACT SIP Staff Report at Appendices A-B. SMAQMD's 2006
RACT SIP Staff Report and Updated RACT SIP Staff Report include
detailed analyses of its SIP rules including discussions of how those
rules continue to implement RACT for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
    First, with respect to CTG source categories, Table 1 of the 2006
RACT SIP Staff Report and Table 1 of the Updated RACT SIP Staff Report
lists all CTG source categories and match those CTG categories with
corresponding District rules which implement RACT. SMAQMD also searched
its database of permitted sources and telephone directories for
potential sources belonging to those CTG categories for which the
District did not have rules. Based on these evaluations, the District
concluded that there were no CTG source categories for which the
District had sources but no applicable RACT requirement. See 2006 RACT
SIP Staff Report at 2 and Updated RACT SIP Staff Report at 3. Our
review of CARB's emissions inventory database for potential CTG sources
did not uncover any CTG source categories missing from the District's
analyses.
    Where there are no existing sources covered by a particular CTG
document, states may, in lieu of adopting RACT requirements for those
sources, adopt negative declarations certifying that there are no such
sources in the relevant nonattainment area. Table 2 below lists all of
the source categories for which SMAQMD's 2006 RACT SIP and Updated RACT
SIP provide negative declarations.

                  Table 2--SMAQMD Negative Declarations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
          CTG Source category                   CTG Document title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aerospace Coating......................  EPA-453/R-97-004 and 59 FR
                                          29216 (6/06/94)--Control of
                                          Volatile Organic Compound
                                          Emissions from Coating
                                          Operations at Aerospace
                                          Manufacturing and Rework
                                          Operations.
Automobile Coating.....................  EPA-450/2-77-008--Control of
                                          Volatile Organic Emissions
                                          from Existing Stationary
                                          Sources, Volume II: Surface
                                          Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper,
                                          Fabrics, Automobiles, and
                                          Light-Duty Trucks.
Dry Cleaning (Petroleum Solvent).......  EPA-450/3-82-009--Control of
                                          Volatile Organic Compound
                                          Emissions from Large Petroleum
                                          Dry Cleaners.
Graphic Arts (Rotogravure).............  EPA-450/2-78-033--Control of
                                          Volatile Organic Emissions
                                          from Existing Stationary
                                          Sources, Volume VIII: Graphic
                                          Arts--Rotogravure and
                                          Flexography.
Large Appliance Coating................  EPA-450/2-77-034--Control of
                                          Volatile Organic Emissions
                                          from Existing Stationary
                                          Sources, Volume V: Surface
                                          Coating of Large Appliances.
                                         EPA-453/R-07-004--Control
                                          Techniques Guidelines for
                                          Large Appliance Coatings.
Magnetic Wire Coating..................  EPA-450/2-77-033--Control of
                                          Volatile Organic Emissions
                                          from Existing Stationary
                                          Sources, Volume IV: Surface
                                          Coating for Insulation of
                                          Magnetic Wire.
Metal Coil Coating.....................  EPA-450/2-77-008--Control of
                                          Volatile Organic Emissions
                                          from Existing Stationary
                                          Sources, Volume II: Surface
                                          Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper,
                                          Fabrics, Automobiles, and
                                          Light-Duty Trucks.
Natural Gas/Gasoline Processing........  EPA-450/2-83-007--Control of
                                          Volatile Organic Compound
                                          Equipment Leaks from Natural
                                          Gas/Gasoline Processing
                                          Plants.
Paper and Fabric Coating...............  EPA-450/2-77-008--Control of
                                          Volatile Organic Emissions
                                          from Existing Stationary
                                          Sources, Volume II: Surface
                                          Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper,
                                          Fabrics, Automobiles, and
                                          Light-Duty Trucks.
Resin Manufacturing (High-Density        EPA-450/3-83-008--Control of
 Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and         Volatile Organic Compound
 Polystyrene).                            Emissions from Manufacture of
                                          High-Density Polyethylene,
                                          Polypropylene, and Polystyrene
                                          Resins.
Refineries.............................  EPA-450/2-77-025--Control of
                                          Refinery Vacuum Producing
                                          Systems, Wastewater Separators
                                          and Process Unit Turnarounds.
                                         EPA-450/2-78-036--Control of
                                          Volatile Organic Compound
                                          Leaks from Petroleum Refinery
                                          Equipment.
Rubber Tire Manufacturing..............  EPA-450/2-78-030--Control of
                                          Volatile Organic Emissions
                                          from Manufacture of Pneumatic
                                          Rubber Tires.
Ship Coating...........................  61 FR 44050--Control Techniques
                                          Guidelines for Shipbuilding
                                          and Ship Repair Operations
                                          (Surface Coating).
Wood Coating (Flat Wood Paneling)......  EPA-450/2-78-032--Control of
                                          Volatile Organic Emissions
                                          from Existing Stationary
                                          Sources, Volume VII: Factory
                                          Surface Coating of Flat Wood
                                          Paneling.
                                         EPA-453/R06-004--Control
                                          Techniques Guidelines for Flat
                                          Wood Paneling Coatings.
Paper, Film and Foil...................  EPA-453/R-07-004--Control
                                          Techniques Guidelines for
                                          Paper, Film, and Foil
                                          Coatings.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: 2006 RACT SIP at 1-2 and Updated RACT SIP at 2-3.

    Subsequent to submitting its 2006 RACT SIP and Updated RACT SIP,
SMAQMD submitted, and the EPA approved, negative declarations for the
following CTG source categories: Coating Operations at Aerospace
Manufacturing and Rework Operations (77 FR 23130, April 18, 2012),
Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials (77 FR 63743, October 17,
2012), and Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings (77 FR
63743, October 17, 2012).
    With the exception of the Pharmaceuticals Manufacturing CTG and the
municipal landfill category, we are proposing to find that SMAQMD's
2006 RACT SIP and Updated RACT SIP, including the above negative
declarations, largely demonstrate that the applicable SIP rules for the
CTG source categories operating within the Sacramento Metro area
satisfy RACT for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. We will discuss the
deficiencies with Rule 455, Pharmaceuticals Manufacturing and the
municipal landfill category, in the next section.
    Our 2006 RACT SIP TSD provides a more detailed discussion of the
EPA's rationale, including an overview of the District's analyses which
were made available for public comment during the District's rulemaking
process, together with recommendations for rule improvements.
    Second, with respect to certain non-CTG source categories located
at facilities that are major stationary sources of VOC or
NOX emissions, the 2006 RACT SIP Staff Report contains: (1)
A summary of recommendations or requirements contained in applicable
Alternative Control Technique (ACT) documents, federal and state RACT
guidance documents, and/or regulations; (2) a summary of the applicable
District rules; and (3) an evaluation of the District's rules in light
of the applicable RACT guidance documents and/or regulations. See 2006
RACT SIP Staff Report at Appendix B. Based on these evaluations, SMAQMD
concludes that non-CTG emission sources located within these VOC or
NOX major stationary sources are generally covered by SIP-
approved rules that satisfy RACT for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. We
are proposing to find that the SMAQMD's 2006 RACT SIP and Updated RACT
SIP submissions adequately demonstrate that the applicable SIP rules
for these non-CTG sources located at major stationary sources satisfy
RACT for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
    Our 2006 RACT SIP TSD provides a more detailed discussion of the
EPA's rationale for these proposals, including an overview of the
District's analyses which were made available for public comment during
the District's rulemaking process.
    Finally, with respect to all other major stationary sources of VOC
or NOX emissions, the 2006 RACT SIP and Updated RACT SIP
identify the applicable SIP rules or SIP-approved permit provisions
that the EPA has previously approved as satisfying RACT. Our review of
CARB's emissions inventory database did not uncover any additional
major stationary sources that were missed in the District's analyses.
Based on the EPA's review of the District's evaluations, we propose to
conclude that with the exception of the Pharmaceuticals Manufacturing
rule and municipal waste landfill category, all of the identified SIP
rules and permit conditions satisfy RACT for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS.

C. What are the RACT deficiencies?

    Rule 455, Pharmaceuticals Manufacturing, (amended 11/29/83 and 9/5/
96) lacks test methods, recordkeeping, and monitoring requirements
which are necessary to support enforcement of the rule. See CAA section
110(a). These are deficiencies listed in the EPA's ``Blue Book''
(Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations, May 25, 1988, revised January 11, 1990) and should be
corrected.
    The Kiefer landfill is a major source of VOCs located within the
Sacramento Metro area. SMAQMD Rule 485, Municipal Landfill Gas, exempts
landfills covered under the NSPS, 40 CFR part 60 Subpart WWW, including
Kiefer Landfill. Although the District has been delegated authority to
implement and enforce the NSPS, as well as the relevant NESHAP (40 CFR
part 63 Subpart AAAA), those requirements have not been incorporated
into the SIP. The District should amend the rule or submit relevant
portions of the facility's permit for SIP approval.

D. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the RACT SIP

    Our TSDs for the 2006 RACT SIP and Updated RACT SIP provide
additional recommendations for future rule improvements.

E. Proposed Action and Public Comment

    For the reasons discussed above and explained more fully in our
2006 RACT SIP TSD and Updated RACT SIP TSD, the EPA proposes to
partially approve and partially disapprove SMAQMD's 2006 RACT SIP and
Updated RACT SIP. Under CAA section 110(k)(3), we propose to approve
the 2006 RACT SIP and Updated RACT SIP, with the exception of Rule 455,
Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and the municipal waste landfill category,
as satisfying the RACT requirements of CAA section 182(b)(2) and (f).
    Also under CAA section 110(k)(3), we propose to disapprove those
elements of the 2006 RACT SIP and Updated RACT SIP that pertain to Rule
455 and the municipal waste landfill category, which the EPA has
determined do not meet all of the applicable CAA requirements. We will
not finalize this partial disapproval, however, if we fully approve
revisions to Rule 455 and the municipal waste landfill category as
satisfying RACT before finalizing action on the 2006 RACT SIP and
Updated RACT SIP.
    The EPA is committed to working with CARB and the District to
resolve the Rule 455 and municipal waste landfill RACT deficiencies
identified in this proposed action.
    If finalized, this partial disapproval would trigger the 2-year
clock for the federal implementation plan (FIP) requirement under
section 110(c).
    In addition, final disapproval would trigger sanctions under CAA
section 179 and 40 CFR 52.31 unless the EPA approves subsequent SIP
revisions that correct the RACT SIP deficiencies within 18 months of
the effective date of the final action.
    We will accept comments from the public on the proposed partial
approval and partial disapproval for the next 30 days.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA because this action does not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities beyond those
imposed by state law.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. This action does not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, no additional costs to
State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, will
result from this action.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175, because the SIP is not approved to apply on any
Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction, and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs the EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would
be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. The EPA
believes that this action is not subject to the requirements of section
12(d) of the NTTAA because application of those requirements would be
inconsistent with the CAA.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Population

    The EPA lacks the discretionary authority to address environmental
justice in this rulemaking.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: December 11, 2015.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2016-00571 Filed 1-14-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: March 25, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 56)]
[Notices]
[Page 12875]
[DOCID:fr25mr09-119]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1824-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]

Oregon; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Oregon (FEMA-1824-DR), datedMarch 2, 2009, and related
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: March 13, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Oregon is hereby amended to include the following area
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the
event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of
March 2, 2009.

    Washington County for Public Assistance [Categories A-G]
(already designated for emergency protective measures [Category B],
including snow removal assistance, under the Public Assistance
program).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Nancy Ward,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 [FR Doc. E9-6713 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: February 8, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 26)]
[Notices]
[Page 5965-5966]
[DOCID:fr08fe07-29]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0004; FRL-8115-6]

Access to Confidential Business Information by Lockheed-Martin
Services, Inc.

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document supersedes the January 31, 2007 (72 FR 4502)
(FRL-8112-1) Federal Register notice authorizing access to Confidential
Business Information (CBI) by EPA's contractor, Lockheed-Martin
Services, Inc. of Cherry Hill, NJ, and its subcontractors. This action
corrects an administrative error in the date of access to CBI by
Lockheed-Martin Services, Inc. of Cherry Hill, NJ, and its
subcontractors. EPA by this document authorizes its contractor,
Lockheed-Martin Services, Inc. of Cherry Hill, NJ, and its
subcontractors, to access information which has been submitted to EPA
under sections 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, and 13 of the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA). Some of the information may be claimed or
determined to be CBI.

DATES: Access to the confidential data will occur no sooner than
February 15, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information contact: Colby
Lintner, Regulatory Coordinator, Environmental Assistance Division
(7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    For technical information contact: Pamela Moseley, Information
Management Division (7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Notice Apply to Me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. This action may,
however, be of interest to those persons who are or may be required to
conduct testing of chemical substances under TSCA. Since other entities
may also be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all
the specific entities that may be affected by this action. If you have
any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?

    1. Docket. EPA established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0004. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket's index available at http://www.regulations.gov.
 Although listed in the index, some information is

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov
, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPPT

Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) at
Rm. 3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC.
The EPA/DC Public Reading Room hours of operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. The telephone
number of the EPA/DC Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the OPPT Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Docket visitors
are required to show photographic identification, pass through a metal
detector, andsign the EPA visitor log. All visitor bags are processed
through an X-ray machine and subject to search. Visitors will be
provided an EPA/DC badge that must be visible at all times in the
building and returned upon departure.
    2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.

II. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    Under EPA contract number 68-W-04-005, contractor Lockheed-Martin
Services, Inc. of 2339 Route 70 West, Floor 3W, Cherry Hill, NJ, and
its subcontractors Bearing Point of 1676 International Dr., McLean, VA;
Intervise of 12 South Summit Ave., Suite 100, Gaithersburg, MD;
McDonald Bradley of 2250 Corporate Park Dr., Suite 500, Herndon, VA;
and Subsidium of 115 Chester St., Front Royal, VA, will assist the
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) in Management Systems
architecture design, integration, testing, and development. They will
also assist with project management, scheduling, and support of the
Enterprise Content Management System (ECMS).
    In accordance with 40 CFR 2.306(j), EPA has determined that under
EPA contract number 68-W-04-005, Lockheed-Martin Services, Inc. and its
subcontractors will require access to CBI submitted to EPA under
sections 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, and 13 of TSCA to perform successfully the
duties specified under the contract. Lockheed-Martin Services, Inc. and
its subcontractor personnel will be given access to information
submitted to EPA under sections 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, and 13 of TSCA. Some
of the information may be claimed or determined to be CBI.
    EPA is issuing this notice to inform all submitters of information
under sections 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, and 13 of TSCA that EPA may provide
Lockheed-Martin Services, Inc. and its subcontractors access to these
CBI materials on a need-to-know basis only. All access to TSCA CBI
under this contract will take place at EPA Headquarters.
    Lockheed-Martin Services, Inc. and its subcontractors will be
authorized access to TSCA CBI at EPA Headquarters under the EPA TSCA
CBI Protection Manual.
    Clearance for access to TSCA CBI under this contract may continue
until January 8, 2009, unless such access is extended.
    Lockheed-Martin Services, Inc. and its subcontractors personnel
will be required to sign nondisclosure agreements and will be briefed
on appropriate security procedures before they are permitted access to
TSCA CBI.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Confidential business information.

    Dated: February 5, 2007.
Brion Cook,
Director, Information Management Division, Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 07-587 Filed 2-6-07; 1:10 pm]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3536-3537]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01164]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2014-0754; FRL-9921-93-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas and
Oklahoma; Regional Haze State Implementation Plans; Interstate
Transport State Implementation Plan To Address Pollution Affecting
Visibility and Regional Haze; Federal Implementation Plan for Regional
Haze and Interstate Transport of Pollution Affecting Visibility;
Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the December 16, 2014 Federal Register the Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) requested comments by February 17, 2015 on a
proposed rule pertaining to the Regional Haze and interstate visibility
transport requirements for Texas and the Regional Haze requirements for
Oklahoma. We also proposed a Federal Implementation Plan to correct
deficiencies identified in the plans. EPA is extending the public
comment period for this proposal until April 20, 2015.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 20, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2014-0754, by one of the following methods:
     Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Mail: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-
L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
     Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Such deliveries are
accepted only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays, and not
on legal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries
of boxed information.
     Fax: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-
L), at fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2014-
0754. Our policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means we will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to us without going through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, we recommend that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If we cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, we may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region 6,
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available at either location (e.g., CBI).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Kordzi,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule
an appointment with Mr. Kordzi or Mr. Bill Deese at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA. On December 16, 2014, we
published in the Federal Register a proposed rule pertaining to
regional haze and interstate transport of pollution affecting
visibility (79 FR 74818). Specifically, we proposed to (1) partially
approve and partially disapprove revisions to the Texas SIP pertaining
to regional haze and disapprove revisions regarding visibility
protection, (2) disapprove a revision to the Oklahoma SIP pertaining to
regional haze, and (3) establish a FIP to remedy these deficiencies.
The proposed FIP would implement SO2 emission limits on
fifteen Texas air pollution sources. In the proposal we requested
comments by February 17, 2015.
    We received several requests for an extension of the comment period
and, in response, have decided to allow an additional 60 days. We are
extending the comment period to April 20, 2015.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
dioxides, Visibility, Interstate transport of pollution, Regional haze,
Best available control technology.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: January 14, 2015.
Wren Stenger,
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division Director, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2015-01164 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 214 (Friday, November 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76941-76942]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26707]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP17-77-000.
    Applicants: OkTex Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing 2015-2016--Gas Sales and Purchases
Report.
    Filed Date: 10/27/16.
    Accession Number: 20161027-5073.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-78-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Neg Rate 2016-10-27 BP for 10-
30-16 to be effective 10/30/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/27/16.
    Accession Number: 20161027-5079.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-79-000.
    Applicants: Elba Express Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 2016 Expansion Negotiated Rate
Filing to be effective 12/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/27/16.
    Accession Number: 20161027-5080.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-80-000.
    Applicants: Pine Needle LNG Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Authority to
be effective 11/27/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/27/16.
    Accession Number: 20161027-5087.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-81-000.
    Applicants: Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: L&U and Fuel Filing to be
effective 12/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/27/16.
    Accession Number: 20161027-5103.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-82-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 2016 GSS LSS Tracker (EP &
TCRA) to be effective 11/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/27/16.
    Accession Number: 20161027-5128.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-83-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Cherokee
AGL--Replacement Shippers--Nov 2016 to be effective 11/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/27/16.
    Accession Number: 20161027-5140.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-84-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Occidental Energy Negotiated
Rate to be effective 11/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/27/16.
    Accession Number: 20161027-5162.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-85-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 10/27/16 Negotiated Rates--
Trafigura Trading LLC (HUB) 7445-89 to be effective 11/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/27/16.
    Accession Number: 20161027-5171.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-86-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Salem Lateral Non-Conforming
Agreements Filing to be effective 11/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/27/16.
    Accession Number: 20161027-5174.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-87-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Salem Lateral--Negotiated Rates
Filing to be effective 11/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/27/16.
    Accession Number: 20161027-5179.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-88-000.
    Applicants: Trunkline Gas Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Annual Interruptible Storage Revenue
Credit filed 10-28-16.
    Filed Date: 10/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20161028-5006.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/9/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-89-000.
    Applicants: Destin Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Fuel Retention Adjustment Oct
2016 to be effective 12/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20161028-5018.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/9/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-90-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: DTI--October 28, 2016
Negotiated Rate Agreements to be effective 11/1/2016
    Filed Date: 10/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20161028-5032.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/9/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-91-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Compliance filing Penalty Revenue Sharing Report--
2016.
    Filed Date: 10/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20161028-5038.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/9/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-92-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 10/28/16 Negotiated Rates--
Statoil Natural Gas LLC (RTS)--7120-03 to be effective 11/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20161028-5069.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/9/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-93-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: PCB TETLP DEC 2016 FILING to
be effective 12/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20161028-5111.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/9/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-94-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Neg Rate 2016-10-28 4 K's to
be effective 11/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20161028-5128.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/9/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-95-000.
    Applicants: Vector Pipeline L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Tariff Revisions Filing (10-
31-2016) to be effective 12/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/31/16.
    Accession Number: 20161031-5024.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/14/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-96-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates
ConocoPhillips contract 911388 to be effective 11/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/31/16.
    Accession Number: 20161031-5030.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/14/16.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by

clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and Sec.  385.214) on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests
may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to
the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 31, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-26707 Filed 11-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 235 (Monday, December 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78847-78849]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26821]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2879-012]

Green Mountain Power Corporation; Notice of Application Accepted
for Filing, Soliciting Motions To Intervene and Protests, Ready for
Environmental Analysis, and Soliciting Comments, Recommendations,
Preliminary Terms and Conditions, and Preliminary Fishway Prescriptions

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: New Major License.
    b. Project No.: 2879-012.
    c. Date Filed: January 30, 2020.
    d. Applicant: Green Mountain Power Corporation (GMP).
    e. Name of Project: Bolton Falls Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The existing project is located on the Winooski River
in Washington County, Vermont. The project does not affect federal
lands.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791 (a)--825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. John Greenan, P.E., Engineer, Green
Mountain Power Corporation, 1252 Post Road, Rutland, Vermont 05701;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER> or email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. FERC Contact: Michael Tust at<PHONE_NUMBER>; or email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing motions to intervene and protests, comments,
recommendations, preliminary terms and conditions, and preliminary

prescriptions: 60 days from the issuance date of this notice; reply
comments are due 105 days from the issuance date of this notice.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
motions to intervene, protests, comments, recommendations, preliminary
terms and conditions, and preliminary fishway prescriptions using the
Commission's eFiling system at https://ferconline.ferc.gov/FERCOnline.aspx. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000
characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at
https://ferconline.ferc.gov/QuickComment.aspx. You must include your
name and contact information at the end of your comments. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, you may submit a paper copy.
Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service must be addressed to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426. Submissions sent via
any other carrier must be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville,
Maryland 20852.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    k. This application has been accepted for filing and is now ready
for environmental analysis.
    The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) issued a final rule on
July 15, 2020, revising the regulations under 40 CFR parts 1500-1518
that federal agencies use to implement NEPA (see Update to the
Regulations Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act, 85 FR 43,304). The Final Rule became
effective on and applies to any NEPA process begun after September 14,
2020. An agency may also apply the regulations to ongoing activities
and environmental documents begun before September 14, 2020, which
includes the proposed Bolton Falls Project relicensing. Commission
staff intends to conduct its NEPA review in accordance with CEQ's new
regulations.
    l. The Bolton Falls Project consists of the following constructed
facilities: (1) A 92-foot-high, 275-foot-wide timber crib dam with a 5-
foot-high rubber dam atop the timber crib construction with a maximum
crest elevation of 397 feet and a 196-foot-long reinforced concrete
spillway cap at a crest elevation of 392 feet; (2) a 59-acre
impoundment with a total storage capacity of 300 acre-feet at a normal
operating elevation of 397 feet; (3) a forebay with two concrete
intakes, each with a 3-inch-spaced trashrack; (4) two 10-foot diameter,
120-foot-long steel penstocks; (5) a 73-foot-long, 57-foot-wide
powerhouse containing two horizontal, 3,750-kilowatt Kaplan turbines
with a total installed capacity of 7,500 kilowatts; (6) a 36-inch
diameter steel bypass pipe with an invert elevation of 383 feet that
discharges near the left side of the spillway base; (7) an
approximately 130-foot long, 5-kilovolt underground transmission line
connecting to an adjacent switchyard; (8) a 600-foot-long, 34.5-
kilovolt overhead transmission line connecting to a second switchyard;
and (9) appurtenant facilities. GMP also maintains day-use recreation
facilities at the project, including a picnic area, trails, fishing
access, and a canoe launch and portage trail.
    GMP proposes to operate in automated run-of-river mode as it does
under its current practice but instead of providing a 300-cubic feet
per second (cfs) minimum flow into the Winooski River through the
powerhouse (when generating) or via spill over the dam (when not
generating) as it does now, GMP proposes to provide a seasonal
aesthetic spill flow of 75 cfs or inflow, whichever is less, into the
bypassed reach via spillage over the dam during daylight hours from
April 1 through December 15. At all other times, bypassed reach flows
would be reduced to leakage except when inflow drops below the minimum
hydraulic capacity (i.e., 365 cfs) or when inflow exceeds the maximum
hydraulic capacity (2,400 cfs) of the generating units in which case
additional flows would be released to the bypassed reach via spill over
the dam. Under normal flow conditions when aesthetic spillage is
required, GMP proposes to maintain the impoundment at an elevation of
397.25 feet. When aesthetic spillage over the dam is not required, GMP
proposes to maintain the reservoir at an elevation of 397 feet as it
does now. GMP also proposes to: (1) Relocate recreation parking area
out of the floodplain; (2) implement measures to protect creeping
lovegrass at the day-use area; (3) add two picnic tables and an
information kiosk to the day-use area; and (4) improve the portage
landing, trail, and signage.
    m. A copy of the application can viewed on the Commission's website
at http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.
    Register online at https://ferconline.ferc.gov/FERCOnline.aspx to
be notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.
    n. Anyone may submit comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene
in accordance with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure,
18 CFR 385.210, .211, and .214. In determining the appropriate action
to take, the Commission will consider all protests or other comments
filed, but only those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with
the Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any
comments, protests, or motions to intervene must be received on or
before the specified comment date for the particular application.
    All filings must (1) bear in all capital letters the title PROTEST,
MOTION TO INTERVENE, COMMENTS, REPLY COMMENTS, RECOMMENDATIONS,
PRELIMINARY TERMS AND CONDITIONS, or PRELIMINARY FISHWAY PRESCRIPTIONS;
(2) set forth in the heading the name of the applicant and the project
number of the application to which the filing responds; (3) furnish the
name, address, and telephone number of the person protesting or
intervening; and (4) otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR
385.2001 through 385.2005. All comments, recommendations, terms and
conditions or prescriptions must set forth their evidentiary basis and
otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may
obtain copies of the application directly from the applicant. A copy of
any protest or motion to intervene must be served upon each
representative of the applicant specified in the particular
application. A copy of all other filings in reference to this
application must be accompanied by proof of service on all persons
listed in the service list prepared by the Commission in this
proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.
    o. Final amendments to the application must be filed with the
Commission no later than thirty (30) days from the issuance date of
this notice.

    p. The applicant must file no later than 60 days following the date
of issuance of this notice: (1) A copy of the water quality
certification; (2) a copy of the request for certification, including
proof of the date on which the certifying agency received the request;
or (3) evidence of waiver of water quality certification. Please note
that the certification request must be sent to the certifying authority
and to the Commission concurrently.
    q. Procedural schedule: The application will be processed according
to the following preliminary Hydro Licensing Schedule. Revisions to the
schedule will be made as appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Milestone                           Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deadline for Filing Comments,             January 2021.
 Recommendations, and Agency Terms and
 Conditions/Prescriptions.
Deadline for Filing Reply Comments......  March 2021.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: December 1, 2020.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-26821 Filed 12-4-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38687-38688]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16828]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2804-035]

Goose River Hydro, Inc.; Notice of Application Accepted for
Filing and Soliciting Motions To Intervene and Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.

    a. Type of Application: New Minor License.
    b. Project No.: 2804-035.
    c. Date filed: February 2, 2018.
    d. Applicant: Goose River Hydro, Inc.
    e. Name of Project: Goose River Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Goose River, in Waldo County, Maine. No federal
lands are occupied by the project works or located within the project
boundary.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791 (a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Nicholas Cabral, Goose River Hydro, Inc., 41
Sedgewood Drive, Kennebunk, ME 04043;<PHONE_NUMBER>; email_
[email protected]
    i. FERC Contact: Julia Kolberg at<PHONE_NUMBER>; or email at
[email protected].
    j. Deadline for filing motions to intervene and protests: 60 days
from the issuance date of this notice.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
motions to intervene and protests using the Commission's eFiling system
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. For assistance, please
contact FERC Online Support at [email protected], (866) 208-
3676 (toll free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY). In lieu of electronic
filing, please send a paper copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. The
first page of any filing should include docket number P-2804-035.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    k. This application has been accepted, but is not ready for
environmental analysis at this time.
    l. The project consists of the following existing facilities:

Swan Lake Dam

    (1) A 14-foot-high, 250-foot-long rock masonry gravity dam
impounding Swan Lake with a surface area of approximately 1,364 acres
at an elevation of 201 feet above sea level; (2) a concrete inlet
structure; (3) three 3.5-foot-high, 4-foot-wide manually operated
butterfly gates that regulate flow through the inlet structure; (4) two
culverts the convey flow under Route 141; and (5) appurtenant
facilities.

Mason's Dam

    (1) A 15-foot-high, 86-foot-long rock masonry dam impounding a
reservoir with a storage capacity of approximately 1,621 acre-feet at
an elevation of 188 feet above sea level; (2) a concrete inlet
structure; (3) a manually operated butterfly gate regulating flow from
the inlet structure to the penstock; (4) a 3-foot-diameter, 350-foot-
long steel penstock; (5) a 266-square-foot concrete powerhouse
containing two Kaplan turbines and generating units with a licensed
capacity of 75 kW; (6) a 300-foot-long, 12-kilovolt (kV) transmission
line and (7) appurtenant facilities.

Kelley Dam

    (1) A 15-foot-high, 135-foot-long masonry gravity dam impounding a
reservoir with a storage capacity of approximately 200 acre-feet at an
elevation of approximately 159 feet above sea level; and (2) three 3-
foot-high, 4-foot-wide manually operated butterfly gates.

Mill Dam

    (1) A 6-foot-tall, 70-foot-wide masonry dam impounding a reservoir
with a storage capacity of approximately 7 acre-feet at an elevation of
approximately 128 feet above sea level; (2) a concrete inlet structure;
(3) a trash sluice with wooden stop logs; (4) a powerhouse containing a
Francis-type turbine and generator unit with a licensed capacity of 94
kW; and (5) an approximately 100-foot-long, 12-kV transmission line.
The penstock used to deliver water to the powerhouse has been removed
due to deterioration and subsequent leakage; thus, the powerhouse is
not operating.

CMP Dam

    (1) A 21-foot-high, 231-foot-long buttress dam impounding a
reservoir with a storage capacity of approximately 72 acre-feet at an
elevation of approximately 109 feet above sea level; (2) a manually
operated low-level water release lift gate; (3) a manually operated
lift gate regulating flow to the penstock; (4) a 5-foot-diameter,
1,200-foot-long steel penstock; (5) a 300-square-foot concrete and
timber powerhouse with a Kaplan-type turbine and generator unit with a
licensed capacity of 200 kW; and (6) an approximately 500-foot-long,
12-kV transmission line. The penstock used to deliver water to the
powerhouse is currently out of service due to damage, deterioration,
and subsequent leakage; thus, the powerhouse is not operating.
    m. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item h above.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.

    n. Anyone may submit a protest or a motion to intervene in
accordance with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18
CFR 385.210, 385.211, and 385.214. In determining the appropriate
action to take, the Commission will consider all protests filed, but
only those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with the
Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any protests
or motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
deadline date for the particular application.
    All filings must (1) bear in all capital letters the title PROTEST
or MOTION TO INTERVENE; (2) set forth in the heading the name of the
applicant and the project number of the application to which the filing
responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone number of the
person protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise comply with the
requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. Agencies may obtain
copies of the application directly from the applicant. A copy of any
protest or motion to intervene must be served upon each representative
of the applicant specified in the particular application.

    Dated: July 30, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-16828 Filed 8-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7620-7622]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2950]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63837; File No. SR-EDGX-2011-03]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Amendments to the EDGX Exchange, Inc. Fee Schedule

February 3, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on February 1, 2011, the EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
the ``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its fees and rebates applicable to
Members \3\ of the Exchange pursuant to EDGX Rule 15.1(a) and (c). All
of the changes described herein are applicable to EDGX Members. The
text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Internet Web site at http://www.directedge.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ A Member is any registered broker or dealer, or any person
associated with a registered broker or dealer, that has been
admitted to membership in the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    In SR-EDGX-2010-10,\4\ the Exchange filed for immediate
effectiveness a rule filing to charge for legacy ISE \5\ Financial
Information Exchange (``FIX'') sessions (``Sessions'') used to connect
to EDGX and thereby, amended its fee schedule accordingly.\6\ These
Sessions are logical ports used to enter orders into the Exchange's
trading system and to receive order messages from the Exchange. The
Sessions are currently being used to send orders to EDGX by certain
legacy Members of the ISE who became Members of EDGX. The amendment to
the fee schedule enabled the Exchange to continue to bill Members for
these Sessions until they are terminated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62640 (August 4,
2010), 75 FR 48734 (August 11, 2010) (SR-EDGX-2010-10).
    \5\ A wholly-owned subsidiary of Direct Edge Holdings, LLC
(prior to July 16, 2010) previously operated the ISE Stock Exchange
as a facility of ISE. These Session fees are identical to the fees
filed previously filed by and billed for by the ISE. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 56379 (September 10, 2007), 72 FR 52591
(September 14, 2007) (SR-ISE-2007-79).
    \6\ As stated in SR-ISE-2007-79, the ISE used the FIX protocol,
which Members program to in order to develop applications that send
trading commands and/or queries to and receive broadcasts and/or
transactions from the trading system. The protocol processes quotes,
receives orders from Members, tracks activity in the underlying
markets, when applicable, executes trades in the matching engine,
and broadcasts trade details to participating Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that all Members have transitioned their order
entry to other ports and no firms currently send orders over ISE FIX
sessions as of February 1, 2011. Therefore, effective February 1, 2011,
the Exchange will be discontinuing the ISE FIX sessions as all Members
of EDGX that previously used ISE FIX sessions have transitioned to
their Direct EDGX Sessions.
    In SR-EDGX-2011-01, the Exchange added the ROOC routing option in
Rule 11.9(b)(3)(p) for orders that the entering firm wishes to
designate for participation in the opening or closing process of a
primary listing market (NYSE, Nasdaq, NYSE Amex, or NYSE Arca) if
received before the opening/closing time of such market. If shares
remain unexecuted after attempting to execute in the opening or closing
process, they are either posted to the book, executed, or routed like a
ROUT routing option, as described in Rule 11.9(b)(3)(h). In this
filing, the Exchange proposes to add the corresponding flags for the
use of the ROOC strategy to its fee schedule and assign corresponding
fees. If the entering firm wishes the order to participate in the
listing market close via the ROOC strategy, it will be assigned a flag
of ``CL'' and a fee of $0.0010 per share, except for NYSE Arca. This
fee represents a blended rate of all four primary listing market fees
for participation in the market close. For ease of administration, the
Exchange uses this blended rate as it represents an average fee from
the primary listing markets. However, a flag of ``O'' will be yielded
and the associated fee for the ``O'' flag, $0.0005 per share, will be
assessed, if the order is routed to the NYSE Arca closing process. This
is clarified in proposed footnote 9 to the fee schedule and represents
a pass through of the NYSE Arca fee. If the entering firm wishes to
designate that the order participate in the opening process of NYSE
Amex and it adds liquidity, it will be assigned a flag of ``8'' and a
rebate of $0.0015 per share. This rebate represents a pass through of
the NYSE Amex rebate. If the entering firm wishes to designate that the
order participate in the opening process of NYSE Arca and it adds
liquidity, it will be assigned a flag of ``9'' and a rebate of $0.0021
per share. This rebate represents a pass through of the NYSE Arca
rebate. The Exchange proposes to add these flags effective February 1,
2011 but not implement them until the ROOC strategy is effective, which
is on or about February 14, 2011.
    Currently, the ``K'' flag is yielded when an order is routed to
BATS BZX Exchange using the ROBA order type. The Exchange proposes that
this flag be yielded and its associated fee of $0.0025 per share be
assessed when an order is routed to Nasdaq PSX using the ROUC order
type, as defined in Rule 11.9(b)(3)(a).\7\ This fee of $0.0025 per
share represents a pass through of the Nasdaq PSX rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Rule 11.9(b)(3)(a) defines the ROUC order type as a routing
option under which an order checks the System for available shares,
and then is sent sequentially to destinations on the System routing
table, Nasdaq OMX BX, and NYSE. If shares remain unexecuted after
routing, they are posted on the Exchange's book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, stocks priced below $1.00 are charged 0.20% of the
dollar value of the transaction when routed to Nasdaq and removing
liquidity in securities on all Tapes, as noted in footnote 3 of the fee
schedule and as indicated on corresponding flag J. The Exchange
proposes to increase this fee to 0.30% of the dollar value of the
transaction to reflect an increase in rate provided by Nasdaq,
effective January 3, 2011.
    EDGX Exchange proposes to implement these amendments to the
Exchange fee schedule on February 1, 2011.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\8\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\9\ in particular, as it is
designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among its members and other persons using its
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the fees associated with the new flags
described above represent an equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges. The fee associated with the ``CL'' flag
($0.0010) (except for NYSE Arca) represents a blended rate of all four
primary listing market fees for participation in the market close.
However, a flag of ``O'' will be yielded and the associated fee for the
``O'' flag, $0.0005 per share, will be assessed, if the order is routed
to the NYSE Arca closing process. This represents a pass through of the
NYSE Arca fee. If the entering firm wishes to designate that the order
participate in the opening process of NYSE Amex and it adds liquidity,
it will be assigned a flag of ``8'' and a rebate of $0.0015 per share.
This rebate represents a pass through of the NYSE Amex rebate. If the
entering firm wishes to designate that the order participate in the
opening process of NYSE Arca and it adds liquidity, it will be assigned
a flag of ``9'' and a rebate of $0.0021 per share. This rebate also
represents a pass through of the NYSE Arca rebate. The fee associated
with the K flag ($0.0025 per share) also represents a pass through of
the Nasdaq PSX rate. In addition, as discussed above, stocks priced
below $1.00 are now proposed to be charged 0.30% of the dollar value of
the transaction when routed to Nasdaq and removing liquidity in
securities on all Tapes, as noted in proposed footnote 3 of the fee
schedule. This increase in fee (from 0.20% of the dollar value of the
transaction) reflects a pass through of the Nasdaq's increased rate,
effective January 3, 2011.
    The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive.
The proposed rule change reflects a competitive pricing structure
designed to incent market participants to direct their order flow to
the Exchange. The Exchange believes that

the proposed rates are equitable in that they apply uniformly to all
Members. The Exchange believes the fees and credits remain competitive
with those charged by other venues and therefore continue to be
reasonable and equitably allocated to Members.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \11\ thereunder. At any
time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \11\ 17 CFR 19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-EDGX-2011-03 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2011-03. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission,\12\ all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
EDGX-2011-03 and should be submitted on or before March 3, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The text of the proposed rule change is available on
Exchange's Web site at http://www.directedge.com, on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov, at EDGX, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-2950 Filed 2-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 146 (Friday, July 29, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 45421]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19187]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0677]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; China Basin, San Francisco, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation governing the operation of the
Third Street Drawbridge across China Basin, mile 0.0, at San Francisco,
CA. The deviation is necessary to allow the public to cross the bridge
to participate in the scheduled San Francisco Marathon, a community
event. This deviation allows the bridge to remain in the closed-to-
navigation position during the deviation period.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 7 a.m. to 1 p.m. on July 31,
2011.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of the docket USCG-2011-0677 and are available
online by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0677
in the ``Keyword'' box and then clicking ``Search''. They are also
available for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility
(M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or e-mail David H. Sulouff, Chief, Bridge Section, Eleventh Coast
Guard District; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The City of San Francisco requested a
temporary change to the operation of the Third Street Drawbridge, mile
0.0, over China Basin, at San Francisco, CA. The Third Street
Drawbridge navigation span provides a vertical clearance of 7 feet
above Mean High Water in the closed-to-navigation position. The draw
opens on signal if at least one hour notice is given as required by 33
CFR 117.149. Navigation on the waterway is recreational.
    The drawspan will be secured in the closed-to-navigation position 7
a.m. to 1 p.m. on July 31, 2011, to allow participants in the San
Francisco Marathon to cross the bridge during the event. This temporary
deviation has been coordinated with the waterway users. No objections
to the proposed temporary deviation were raised. The drawspan can be
operated upon one hour advance notice for emergencies requiring the
passage of waterway traffic.
    Vessels that can transit the bridge, while in the closed-to-
navigation position, may continue to do so at any time.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the designated
time period. This deviation from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: July 12, 2011.
D.H. Sulouff,
Bridge Section Chief, Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2011-19187 Filed 7-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


[Federal Register: October 4, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 192)]
[Notices]
[Page 58594-58595]
[DOCID:fr04oc06-51]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-496-001]

Rockies Express Pipeline LLC; Notice of Tariff Filing

September 27, 2006.
    Take notice that on September 25, 2006, Rockies Express Pipeline
LLC (REX) tendered for filing an original and five copies of the
following tariff sheets to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First
Revised Volume No. 1, to be effective October 1, 2006:

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 20
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 20A
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 20B

    REX states that these tariff sheets are being submitted to remove
the ACA unit charge from REX's rate sheets.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of section 154.210 of
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for

review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables
subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to
a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service,
please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll
free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-16347 Filed 10-3-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P