17631 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 69 / Thursday, April 10, 2003 / Notices k. Description of Amendment: The Districts request, among other things, pursuant to sections 4.200( c) and 4.202( a) of the Commission's regulations and Public Law No. 106   343, that the license be amended to extend the deadline for commencement of construction to March 26, 2005. The Districts also request that the deadline for completion of construction be extended to March 26, 2007. l. The filing is available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http:// www. ferc. fed. gov using the `` FERRIS'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, call toll free 1   866   208   3676 or e mail FERCOnlineSupport@ ferc. gov. For TTY, call ( 202) 502   8659. A copy is also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item h above. m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission. n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene    Anyone may submit comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211, .214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified comment date for the particular application. o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents    Any filings must bear in all capital letters the title `` COMMENTS'', `` RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS'', `` PROTEST'', or `` MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable, and the Project Number of the particular application to which the filing refers. Any of the above named documents must be filed by providing an original and eight copies to: The Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. A copy of any motion to intervene must also be served upon each representative of the Applicant specified in the particular application. Comments, protests, and motions to intervene may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR 385.2001( a)( 1)( iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the `` e filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. p. Agency Comments    Federal, state, and local agencies are invited to file comments on the described application. A copy of the application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.

Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [ FR Doc. 03   8772 Filed 4   9   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717   01   P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ OEI   2003   0003, FRL   7479   7]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Continuing Collection; Comment Request; Confidentiality Rules AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act ( 44 U. S. C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that EPA is planning to submit the following continuing Information Collection Request ( ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget ( OMB): Confidentiality Rules, EPA ICR No. 1665.06, OMB Control No. 2020   0003, expiration date September 30, 2003. Before submitting the ICR to OMB for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific aspects of the proposed information collection as described below. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 9, 2003. ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan D. Margolis, Collection Stategies Division, Office of Information Collection ( 2822T), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202   566   1644; fax number: 202   566   1639; e mail address: margolis. alan@ epa. gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID number OEI   2003   0003, which is available for public viewing at the OEI Docket in the EPA Docket Center ( EPA/ DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4: 30 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is ( 202) 566   1744, and the telephone number for the OEI Docket is ( 202) 566   1752; FAX ( 202) 566   1753. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA Dockets ( EDOCKET) at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket. Use EDOCKET to obtain a copy of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select `` search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified above. Any comments related to this ICR should be submitted to EPA within 60 days of this notice, and according to the following detailed instructions: submit your comments to EPA online using EDOCKET ( our preferred method), by email to oei. docket@ epa. gov, or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, OEI Docket, ( 28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. EPA's policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing in EDOCKET as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, confidential business information ( CBI), or other information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in the version of the comment that is placed in EDOCKET. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket. Although identified as an item in the official docket, information claimed as CBI, or whose disclosure is otherwise restricted by statute, is not included in the official public docket, and will not be available for public viewing in EDOCKET. For further information about the electronic docket, see EPA's Federal Register notice describing the electronic docket at 67 FR 38102 ( May 31, 2002), or go to http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket. Affected entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are those who characterize the information they provide to EPA as CBI.

VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 19: 08 Apr 09, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 10APN1. SGM 10APN1 17632 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 69 / Thursday, April 10, 2003 / Notices Title: Confidentiality Rules, OMB Control Number 2020   0003; EPA ICR Number 1665.06, expiring 9/ 30/ 2003. Abstract: EPA administers a number of environmental protection statutes ( e. g., the Clean Water Act; the Clean Air Act; the Toxic Substances Control Act; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act), under which the Agency collects information from thousands of facilities in many economic sectors. In addition, businesses submit information to EPA without the Agency requesting it. The information addresses topics such as toxic chemicals, industrial processes, waste streams, and regulatory compliance. In many cases, businesses that submit information claim it as CBI. EPA established the procedures described in 40 CFR part 2, subparts A and B, to protect the confidentiality of information as well as the rights of the public to obtain access to information under the Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA). In accordance with these regulations, when EPA finds it necessary to make a final confidentiality determination ( e. g., in response to a FOIA request or in the course of rulemaking or litigation) or an advance confidentiality determination, it notifies the affected business by sending a letter requesting substantiation of the confidentiality claim. This letter provides the affected business with an opportunity to submit comments ( i. e., a substantiation). This ICR relates to the collection of information that will assist EPA in determining whether previously submitted information is entitled to confidential treatment. EPA is proposing to use an updated Request for Substantiation letter (`` proposed letter''). The proposed letter consists of two samples to address separate factual situations: Sample Letter A and Sample Letter B. The use of two letters is a clarification of existing EPA procedures. Some of the information requested differs slightly from the current Request for Substantiation letter, concerning the possible voluntary nature of the submission and the issue of substantial competitive harm, and takes into account the vast amount of information now available electronically. Nevertheless, EPA estimates that the overall burden is the same. The proposed letter would apply to any context where a final confidentiality determination is needed, either in response to FOIA requests or in other situations ( e. g., where EPA is making information public to support rulemakings), or in the case of an advance confidentiality determination. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. EPA is soliciting comments to: ( i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; ( ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; ( iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ( iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e. g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Current Burden Statement: EPA estimates that in response to the procedures outlined in 40 CFR part 2, subpart B, the Agency would notify 543 businesses annually and provide them with an opportunity to submit comments explaining why previously submitted information should be treated as confidential. Of the 543 businesses, EPA estimates that approximately 443 industries would respond by submitting substantiations. The Agency estimates that it takes industry approximately 14 hours and $ 464.43 in labor costs to prepare and submit each substantiation; or a total of 6,202 hours at a cost of $ 205,742.49 in labor for all 443 substantiations. For those 100 businesses that do not submit substantiations, they are still likely to spend approximately 1 hour at a cost of $ 32.04 in labor to review EPA's notice, examine the information in question, and make a decision not to respond; or a total of 100 hours at a cost of $ 3,204.00 in labor costs for reviewing and deciding not to respond in 100 cases. The total burden on industry to review and, if desired, respond to 543 EPA substantiation requests is 6,302 hours at a cost of $ 208,946.49 in labor. In addition, when EPA utilizes the services of contractors/ subcontractors under the authority of 40 CFR part 2, subpart B, all contractor/ subcontractor employees who may be given access to confidential information must first sign confidentiality agreements stating that they will honor the terms of the contract/ subcontract which requires the protection of CBI. Contractor/ subcontractor businesses must maintain a file of all such agreements. EPA estimates that there are about 129 contractor/ subcontractor businesses that handle CBI in connection with their work for EPA each year. These 129 contractor/ subcontractor businesses together have a total of approximately 658 employees who must sign confidentiality agreements each year. Each employee would need approximately 0.1 hour to review and sign an agreement, at a cost of $ 3.34 in labor; employees' review and signature of all agreements would require approximately 65.8 hours at a cost of $ 2,197.72 in labor per year. In addition, each subcontractor/ contractor business would need approximately 0.5 hour at a cost of $ 8.07 in labor per year to maintain a file of employee confidentiality agreements; the 129 contractor/ subcontractor businesses together would require a total of 64.5 hours at a labor cost of $ 1,041.03 to maintain a file of confidentiality agreements. The total burden for signing and maintaining confidentiality agreements would thus be 130.3 hours at a cost of $ 3,238.75. The overall burden for handling confidentiality claims   including the substantiation process and the signing and maintaining of confidentiality agreements   would be 6,432.3 hours at a total labor cost of $ 212,185.24 per year. EPA estimates that no capital costs or operation and maintenance costs would be incurred as a result of this information collection. EPA is soliciting the following additional information to assist in its assessment of the Agency's burden statement: 1. How many substantiation requests do you receive from EPA per year? How many CBI substantiations do you submit per year in response? 2. What is the average number, type, and level of staff involved in preparing a substantiation of CBI claims? 3. What is the average number of hours per staff type and level required to prepare a substantiation of CBI claims? How does this hour estimate breakdown by the following activities: a. Read/ review EPA's substantiation request. b. Review information claimed confidential. c. Prepare substantiation. 4. What is the average wage per hour for each staff type and level involved in preparing substantiations?

VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 19: 08 Apr 09, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 10APN1. SGM 10APN1 17633 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 69 / Thursday, April 10, 2003 / Notices Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

Dated: April 2, 2003. Mark Luttner, Director, Office of Information Collection. [ FR Doc. 03   8827 Filed 4   9   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [ DA 03   638]

ITFS, MDS, and MMDS Pending Legal Matters AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In this document the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau ( WTB) has released two lists, the first contains legal matters with a filing date prior to March 25, 2002 where the applicant/ licensee ( or petitioner, if the petitioner is not the applicant or licensee) did not respond to the October Public Notice. Accordingly, any items on the first list are dismissed with prejudice. The second list contains all the current pending legal matters that are in WTB's records in the Instructional Television Fixed Service ( ITFS), the Multipoint Distribution Service ( MDS), and the Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service ( MMDS). This Public Notice ensures that the WTB has a complete and accurate listing of all pending legal matters in the ITFS, the MDS, and the MMDS, which will enable the WTB to act on these pending legal matters. ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., TW   A325, Washington, DC 20554. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Vadas, Esq., Policy and Rules Branch, at ( 202) 418   0680. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Public Notice, DA 03   638, released on March 18, 2002. The full text of this document is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Federal Communications Commission Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. The complete text may be purchased from the Federal Communications Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY   B402, Washington, DC 20554. The full text may also be downloaded at: http:// www. fcc. gov. Alternative formats are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin at ( 202) 418   7426 or TTY ( 202) 418   7365 or at bmillin@ fcc. gov. 1. On October 18, 2002, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau ( WTB) released a Public Notice ( October Public Notice) in which it sought to ensure that it had a complete and accurate listing of all pending legal matters in the Instructional Television Fixed Service ( ITFS), the Multipoint Distribution Service ( MDS), and the Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service ( MMDS). An Appendix ( October Appendix) containing a list of all of the pending ITFS, MDS, and MMDS cases was attached to the October Public Notice. The October Appendix indicated the name of the applicant/ licensee, the file number/ call sign, the pleading type and filing date, the name of the petitioner, if not the applicant, and whether the file was complete. WTB required that all ITFS, MDS, and MMDS licensees, applicants, and other parties with pending pleadings relating to these services review and verify the information contained in the October Appendix. For legal matters with a filing date before March 25, 2002, WTB required that licensees, applicants, and other parties with pending pleadings respond in writing by December 17, 2002 if they desired that WTB continue processing these matters. 2. Appendix A to this Public Notice contains a list of those legal matters with a filing date prior to March 25, 2002 where the applicant/ licensee ( or petitioner, if the petitioner is not the applicant or licensee) did not respond to the October Public Notice. In the October Public Notice, WTB indicated, `` For any legal matter for which written affirmations requesting further processing have not been received, those legal matters will be dismissed with prejudice.'' Accordingly, it is ordered, pursuant to section 4( i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U. S. C. 154( i) and sections 21.28( d) and 73.3568( a)( 1) of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR 21.28 ( d), 73.3568( a)( 1), the legal matters listed in Appendix A to this Public Notice are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 3. WTB also requested petitioners of legal matters pending before the Bureau to review the list of pending matters in the October Appendix. If a pending matter was omitted from the October Appendix, WTB required petitioners to submit two date stamped copies of the omitted petition or filing by December 17, 2002 if the petitioner desired to continue prosecuting the filing. After our review of these files, we have determined that the cases listed in Appendix B to this Public Notice are all the valid pending legal matters that are contained in WTB's records. 4. With respect to other requests to add legal matters to its list of pending legal matters, the WTB notes that in many instances, the respondent, but not the petitioner, submitted legal matters. In those cases, we are not adding those matters to our list of pending legal matters because the petitioner did not express interest in prosecuting the matter.

Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary.

Applicant/ licensee File No./ call sign Petitioner ( if not applicant) Filing date Pleading type Alda Gold, Inc ........................ BPMD   9551382 ..................... ................................................ 3/ 28/ 97 ........... Petition for Reconsideration. Alda Gold, Inc ........................ BPMD   9551384 ..................... ................................................ 3/ 28/ 97 ........... Petition for Reconsideration. Alda Gold, Inc ........................ BPMD   9551386 ..................... ................................................ 3/ 28/ 97 ........... Petition for Reconsideration. Alda Gold, Inc ........................ WHJ902 ................................. ................................................ 3/ 28/ 97 ........... Petition for Reconsideration. Alda Gold, Inc ........................ WHK656 ................................. ................................................ 3/ 28/ 97 ........... Petition for Reconsideration. Alda Gold, Inc ........................ WNTL436 ............................... ................................................ 3/ 28/ 97 ........... Petition for Reconsideration. Atlantic MicroSystems, Inc ..... BMDP960510FG .................... ................................................ 6/ 17/ 96 ........... Petition to Deny. Bookcliff Christian School ...... 951020TS .............................. ................................................ 6/ 16/ 97 ........... Informal Complaint. Bridgewater College .............. BPLIF   93123OEX ................. ................................................ 2/ 26/ 96 ........... Petition for Reconsideration. Burlington College ................. 911008DX .............................. Ascutney Associates, Inc ....... 1/ 3/ 92 ............. Petition to Deny.

VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 19: 50 Apr 09, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 10APN1. SGM 10APN1


[Federal Register: March 13, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 48)]
[Notices]
[Page 11407-11408]
[DOCID:fr13mr07-87]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.

Extension:
    Form N-8B-2, SEC File No. 270-186, OMB Control No. 3235-0186.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget (``OMB'') for extension and approval.
    Form N-8B-2 (17 CFR 274.12) is the form used by unit investment
trusts (``UITs'') that are currently issuing securities, including UITs
that are issuers of periodic payment plan certificates and UITs of
which a management investment company is the sponsor or depositor, to
comply with the filing and disclosure requirements imposed by section
8(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-8(b)). Form
N-8B-2 requires disclosure about the organization of a UIT, its
securities, the trustee, the personnel and affiliated persons of the
depositor, the distribution and redemption of securities, and financial
statements. The Commission uses the information provided in the
collection of information to determine compliance with section 8(b) of
the Investment Company Act.
    Based on the Commission's industry statistics, the Commission
estimates that there would be approximately one initial filing on Form
N-8B-2 and 9 post-effective amendment filings to the Form annually. The
Commission estimates that each registrant filing an initial Form N-8B-2
would spend 44 hours in preparing and filing the Form and that the
total hour burden for all initial Form N-8B-2 filings would be 44
hours. Also, the Commission estimates that each UIT filing a post-
effective amendment to Form N-8B-2 would spend 16 hours in preparing
and filing the amendment and that the total hour burden for all post-
effective amendments to the Form would be 144 hours. By combining the
total hour burdens estimated for initial Form N-8B-2 filings and post-
effective amendments filings to the Form, the Commission estimates that
the total annual burden hours for all registrants on Form N-8B-2 would
be 188. Estimates of the burden hours are made solely for the purposes
of the PRA, and are not derived from a comprehensive or even a
representative survey or study of the costs of SEC rules and forms.
    The information provided on Form N-8B-2 is mandatory. The
information provided on Form N-8B-2 will not be kept confidential. The
Commission may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information

technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions
submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to R. Corey Booth, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O
Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia, 22312;
or send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: March 5, 2007.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-4463 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 130 (Tuesday, July 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 40730]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14542]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. 2020-0420]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: National
Flight Data Center Web Portal

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the following collection of information was
published on April 27, 2020. The collection involves aeronautical
information detailing the physical description and operational status
of all components of the National Airspace System (NAS). The
information to be collected will be used to update government,
military, and private aeronautical databases, charts, publications, and
flight management systems.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by August 6, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed to the attention of the Desk Officer, Department of
Transportation/FAA, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW, Washington,
DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Graybill by email at:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0754.
    Title: National Flight Data Center Web Portal.
    Form Numbers: AD1-ADCP, AD3-ACC.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the following collection of information
was published on April 27, 2020 (2020-08836). 49 U.S.C. 40103,
``Sovereignty and Use of Airspace,'' authorizes and directs the FAA to
develop plans and policy for the use of the navigable airspace. The
National Flight Data Center (NFDC) is the authoritative government
source for collecting, validating, storing, maintaining, and
disseminating aeronautical data concerning the United States and its
territories to support real-time aviation activities. The information
collected ensures the safe and efficient navigation of the national
airspace. The information collected is maintained in the National
Airspace System Resources (NASR) database which serves as the official
repository for NAS data and is provided to government, military, and
private producers of aeronautical charts, publications, and flight
management systems. Information will be collected via digital forms.
    Respondents: Approximately 5,092 representatives of U.S. public
airports. Average of 6,709 responses annually.
    Frequency: Information to be collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 20 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 2,236 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 1, 2020.
John L. Graybill,
Aeronautical Information Specialist, Data Systems Team, Aeronautical
Information Services, AJV-A35.
[FR Doc. 2020-14542 Filed 7-6-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 8, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 39143]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16889]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83763; File No. SR-CHX-2018-001]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt the Route QCT
Cross Routing Option

August 2, 2018.
    On March 6, 2018, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule
change to adopt the Route QCT Cross routing option. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on March 20,
2018.\3\ On May 1, 2018, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange
Act,\4\ the Commission designated a longer period within which to
approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change,
or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the
proposed rule change.\5\ On June 13, 2018, the Commission instituted
proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act \6\ to
determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\
The Commission received one comment letter on the proposed rule
change.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82870 (March 14,
2018), 83 FR 12214.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83143, 83 FR 20123
(May 7, 2018).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83425, 83 FR 28477
(June 19, 2018).
    \8\ See letter from Tracy Richardson, Tribal Technology Trade
Inc., dated June 14, 2018, available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-chx-2018-001/chx2018001.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On July 26, 2018, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change
(SR-CHX-2018-001).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-16889 Filed 8-7-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 13, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62845-62847]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21704]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-9120; Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-024-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; M7 Aerospace LLC

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
M7 Aerospace LLC Models SA226-AT, SA226-T, SA226-T(B), SA226-TC, SA227-
AC (C-26A), SA227-AT, SA227-BC (C-26A), SA227-CC, SA227-DC (C-26B), and
SA227-TT airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by corrosion and
stress corrosion cracking of the pitch trim actuator upper attach
fittings of the horizontal stabilizer front spar. This proposed AD
would require repetitive inspections of the pitch trim actuator upper
attach fittings for corrosion and/or cracking in the bolt holes and the
web/flange radius with replacement of fittings as necessary. We are
proposing this AD to prevent jamming and/or loss of control of the
horizontal stabilizer, which could result in partial or complete loss
of airplane pitch control.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 28,
2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact M7
Aerospace LLC, 10823 NE Entrance Road, San Antonio, Texas 78216; phone:
(210) 824-9421; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet: http://www.elbitsystems-us.com; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>You may view this referenced
service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9120; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew McAnaul, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, ASW-143 (c/o San Antonio MIDO), 10100 Reunion Place, Suite 650,
San Antonio, Texas 78216; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-9120;
Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-024-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We received reports of multiple SA226 and SA227 airplanes with
corrosion and/or stress corrosion cracks in the pitch trim actuator
upper attach fittings of the horizontal stabilizer front spar. This
condition, if not corrected, could result in jamming and/or loss of
control of the horizontal stabilizer with consequent partial or
complete loss of airplane pitch control.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed M7 Aerospace LLC Service Bulletin (SB) 226-27-081 R1,
M7 Aerospace LLC SB 227-27-061 R1, and M7 Aerospace LLC SB CC7-27-033
R1, all Issued: April 13, 2016 and Revised: June 27, 2016. The service
information describes procedures for detailed visual, liquid penetrant,
ultrasound and high frequency eddy current inspections of the pitch
trim actuator upper attach fittings for corrosion and cracking in the
bolt holes and the web/flange radius, and replacement if necessary.
This service information is reasonably available

because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type
designs.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 300 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
            Action                    Labor cost              Parts cost            product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspect pitch trim actuator     16 work-hours x $85     Not Applicable........          $1,360         $408,000
 upper attach fittings.          per hour = $1,360.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the results of the proposed inspection.
We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need
these replacements:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                  Action                                Labor cost                 Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace 2 fittings........................  8 work-hours x $85 per hour = $680          $4,900           $5,580
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

M7 Aerospace LLC: Docket No. FAA-2016-9120; Directorate Identifier
2016-CE-024-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by October 28, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to M7 Aerospace LLC Models SA226-AT, SA226-T,
SA226-T(B), SA226-TC, SA227-AC (C-26A), SA227-AT, SA227-BC (C-26A),
SA227-CC, SA227-DC (C-26B), and SA227-TT airplanes, all serial
numbers, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 5510, Horizontal Stabilizer Structure.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by corrosion and stress corrosion cracking
of the pitch trim actuator upper attach fittings of the horizontal
stabilizer front spar. We are issuing this AD to prevent jamming
and/or loss of control of the horizontal stabilizer, which could
result in partial or complete loss of airplane pitch control.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this AD using the
following service bulletins and within the compliance times
specified, unless already done:
    (1) For Models SA226-AT, SA226-T, SA226-T(B), and SA226-TC: M7
Aerospace LLC Service Bulletin (SB) 226-27-081 R1, Issued: April 13,
2016 and Revised: June 27, 2016; or
    (2) For Models SA227-AC (C-26A), SA227-AT, SA227-BC (C-26A), and
SA227-TT: M7 Aerospace LLC SB 227-27-061 R1, Issued: April 13, 2016
and Revised: June 27, 2016; or
    (3) For Models SA227-CC and SA227-DC (C-26B): M7 Aerospace LLC
SB CC7-27-033 R1, Issued: April 13, 2016 and Revised: June 27, 2016.

(g) Actions

    (1) Within the next 600 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the
effective date of this AD or within the next 12 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, and repetitively
thereafter at intervals not to exceed every 5,000 hours TIS or 5
years, whichever occurs first, perform the inspection of the pitch
trim actuator upper attach fittings following section 2.A. and
return to service following section 2.C. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of the service bulletins identified in paragraphs
(f)(1), (2), or (3) of this AD, as applicable.
    (2) If any corrosion or cracks are found as a result of any
inspection in paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, before further flight,
replace the fitting following section 2.B. and return to service
following section 2.C. of the Accomplishment Instructions of the
service bulletins identified in paragraphs (f)(1), (2), or (3) of
this AD, as applicable.

(h) Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information

    This proposed AD allows credit for inspection or replacement of
the pitch trim actuator upper attach fittings required in paragraph
(g)(1) and (2) of the AD, if done before the effective date of this
AD, following the procedures in the Accomplishment Instructions of
the applicable service information listed in paragraphs (h)(1)
through (3) of this AD:
    (1) For Models SA226-AT, SA226-T, SA226-T(B), and SA226-TC: M7
Aerospace LLC Service Bulletin (SB) 226-27-081, Issued: April 13,
2016; or
    (2) For Models SA227-AC (C-26A), SA227-AT, SA227-BC (C-26A), and
SA227-TT: M7 Aerospace LLC SB 227-27-061, Issued: April 13, 2016; or
    (3) For Models SA227-CC and SA227-DC (C-26B): M7 Aerospace LLC
SB CC7-27-033, Issued: April 13, 2016.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Fort Worth Airplane Certification Office, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(j) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Andrew McAnaul,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, ASW-143 (c/o San Antonio MIDO), 10100
Reunion Place, Suite 650, San Antonio, Texas 78216; phone: (210)
308-3365; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact M7
Aerospace LLC, 10823 NE Entrance Road, San Antonio, Texas 78216;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet: http://www.elbitsystems-us.com; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>You may
view this referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
816-329-4148.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on September 1, 2016.
Pat Mullen,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-21704 Filed 9-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3677-3679]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01299]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2020-0406; FRL-9319-02-R4]

Air Plan Approval; Georgia; 2015 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment New
Source Review Permit Program Requirements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a
revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the State of Georgia through the Georgia Environmental Protection
Division (GA EPD) on July 2, 2020. EPA is approving Georgia's
certification that its existing Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR)
permitting regulations meet the nonattainment planning requirements for
the 2015 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
for the Atlanta Area, comprised of the counties of Bartow, Clayton,
Cobb, DeKalb, Fulton, Gwinnett, and Henry. This action is being taken
pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and its implementing
regulations.

DATES: This rule is effective February 24, 2022.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2020-0406. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the
index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pearlene Williams, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is
(404) 562-9144. Ms. Williams can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On December 6, 2018, EPA issued a final rule entitled
``Implementation of the 2015 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for
ozone: State Implementation Plan Requirements'' (SIP Requirements
Rule), which establishes the requirements that state, tribal, and local
air quality management agencies must meet as they develop
implementation plans for areas where air quality exceeds the 2015 8-
hour ozone NAAQS. See 83 FR 62998; 40 CFR part 51, subpart CC.
    Based on the nonattainment designation for the 2015 8-hour ozone
standard, Georgia was required to develop a SIP revision addressing the
requirements of CAA sections 172(c)(5) and 173 for the Atlanta Area.
See 42 U.S.C. 7502(c). Section 172(c)(5) of the CAA requires each state
with a nonattainment area to submit a SIP revision requiring NNSR
permits in the nonattainment area in accordance with the permitting
requirements of CAA section 173. The minimum SIP requirements for NNSR
permitting for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS are located in 40 CFR
51.165.  See 40 CFR 51.1314. On July 2, 2020, Georgia submitted a SIP
revision addressing, among other things,\1\ permit program requirements
(i.e., NNSR) for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Atlanta Area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The other elements of this submittal are being addressed in
separate rulemakings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 2, 2021, EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) proposing to approve the July 2, 2020, SIP revision regarding
2015 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment New Source Review Permit Program
Requirements for the Atlanta Area. See 86 FR 68447. The December 2,
2021, NPRM provides additional detail regarding the background and
rationale for EPA's action. Comments on the December 2, 2021, NPRM were
due on or before January 3, 2022. EPA received no comments on the
December 2, 2021, NPRM.

II. Final Action

    EPA is approving Georgia's SIP revision addressing the NNSR
requirements for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Atlanta Area,
submitted on July 2, 2020. EPA has concluded that Georgia's submission
fulfills the 40 CFR 51.1314 requirement and meets the requirements of
CAA sections 172(c)(5) and 173 and the minimum SIP requirements of 40
CFR 51.165.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by March 28, 2022. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: January 18, 2022.
Daniel Blackman,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52
as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart L--Georgia

0
2. In Sec.  52.570, amend the table in paragraph (e) by adding an entry
for ``2015 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Nonattainment New Source Review

Requirements for the Atlanta Area'' after the entry for ``2008 8-hour
ozone Maintenance Plan for the Atlanta Area, Revision for the Removal
of Transportation Control Measures'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.570  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                                 EPA-Approved Georgia Non-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                State
     Name of nonregulatory SIP      Applicable geographic  submittal date/   EPA approval date      Explanation
             provision              or nonattainment area  effective date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
2015 8-hour Ozone NAAQS             Bartow, Clayton,             7/2/2020  1/25/2022, [Insert
 Nonattainment New Source Review     Cobb, DeKalb,                          citation of
 Requirements for the Atlanta Area.  Fulton, Gwinnett,                      publication].
                                     and Henry Counties.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-01299 Filed 1-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P