[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 18, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36424-36426]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14416]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2013-0327]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulations for Summer Events; Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing temporary special local
regulations for three summer events within the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan Zone. This rule is intended to provide for the safety of life
and property on navigable waters immediately prior to, during, and
immediately after a triathlon and two dragon-boat races. This rule will
establish restrictions upon, and control the movement of, vessels in a
portion of the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan Zone.

DATES: This rule is effective on June 22, 2013 until July 21, 2013.
This rule will be enforced at various times on June 22 and 23; July 12
and 13; and July 20 and 21 of 2013.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2013-0327. To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the docket number (USCG-2013-0327) in the
``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the
line associated with this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, contact or email MST1 Joseph McCollum, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan, at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Barbara Hairston,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule

A. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)(5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking with
respect to this temporary rule because doing so would be impracticable
and contrary to the public interest. The final details for the three
events listed within this temporary rule were not known to the Coast
Guard until there was insufficient time remaining before the event to
publish an NPRM.
    Because each of the events listed within this temporary rule are
codified within 33 CFR Part 100, the Coast Guard has taken steps to
complete an update of that part. The Coast Guard has written and
submitted an NPRM under the same docket number as this TFR; the NPRM
addresses changes to six events within 33 CFR part 100 so that the
public has opportunity to comment before a Final Rule is published.
This temporary rule has been written to address minor changes in three
of the events listed within 33 CFR part 100 that will take place in
June and July, 2013. Delaying the effective date of this temporary rule
to wait for a comment period to run would be both impracticable and
contrary to the public interest because it would inhibit the Coast
Guard's ability to protect spectators and vessels from the hazards
associated with the swim portion of a triathlon and two Dragon-boat
races, which are discussed further below.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), The Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this temporary rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in
the preceding paragraph, waiting for a 30 day notice period to run
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish Special Local Regulations: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
    This temporary rule will establish restrictions upon, and control
the movement of, vessels in a specified area immediately prior to,
during, and immediately after three marine events. The specifics of
these three events are as follows:
    (1) Harborfest Dragon Boat Race; South Haven, MI. The Harborfest
Dragon Boat Race is an annual event involving an estimated 250
participants maneuvering self-propelled vessels within a portion of the
Black River in South Haven, MI. The organizer for this event submitted
an application showing a date that is different from what is currently
codified in 33 CFR 100.903. Therefore, this temporary rule will
establish a special local regulation for this event on the waters of
the Black River in South Haven, MI on June 22 and 23 from 6 a.m. until
7 p.m.

    (2) Chinatown Chamber of Commerce Dragon Boat Race; Chicago, IL.
The Chinatown Chamber of Commerce Dragon Boat Race is an annual event
involving an estimated 1000 participants maneuvering self-propelled
vessels within a portion of the Chicago River in Chicago, IL. The
organizer for this event submitted an application showing a date that
is different from what is currently codified in 33 CFR 100.909.
Therefore, this temporary rule will establish a special local
regulation for this event on the waters of the Chicago River in
Chicago, IL on July 12 and 13 from 11:30 a.m. until 5 p.m.
    (3) Door County Triathlon; Door County, WI. The swim portion of the
Door County Triathlon is expected to involve thousands of participants
in the waters of Horseshoe Bay--a portion of Green Bay. As this event
is currently listed within 33 CFR 100.905, the effective date expired
in 2011. The Coast Guard has spoken with the event organizer and
confirmed that this Triathlon is expected to occur this year.
Therefore, this temporary rule will establish a special regulated area
for this event on the waters of Horseshoe Bay near Egg Harbor,
Wisconsin on July 20 and 21 from 8 a.m. until 9:30 a.m.
    For each of these events, the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan,
has determined that the likely combination of a race involving a large
number of competitors, spectators, and transiting commercial craft in a
congested area of water presents significant safety risks. These risks
include collisions among competitor and spectator vessels, injury to
swimmers from transiting water craft, capsizing, and drowning.

C. Discussion of Rule

    This rule is intended to ensure safety of life and property on the
navigable waters immediately prior to, during, and immediately after a
triathlon and two dragon-boat races. This rule will establish
restrictions upon, and control the movement of, vessels in a specified
area of the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan zone.
    The Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan will notify the public when
the special local regulations in this temporary rule are or will be
enforced by all appropriate means. Such means of notification will
include, but are not limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners and Local
Notice to Mariners.

 D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. It is not
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
    We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy,
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel
legal or policy issues. The special local regulations established by
this rule will be periodic, of short duration, and designed to minimize
impact on navigable waters. Thus, restrictions on vessel movement are
expected to be minimal. Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels may
still transit through the regulated areas when permitted by the Captain
of the Port.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This rule will affect the
following entities, some of which might be small entities: the owners
or operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in a portion of
Horseshoe Bay near Egg Harbor Wisconsin; the Black River in South Haven
Michigan; or the Chicago River in Chicago Illinois during the times
that this temporary rule is enforced in June and/or July of 2013.
    This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the reasons discussed in the
Regulatory Planning and Review section above.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule would call for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the ``FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT'' section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule

would not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule would not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

 13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of special local
regulations issued in conjunction with a regatta or marine parade, and,
therefore it is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination (CED) are available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.

0
2. Add Sec.  100.35T09-0327 to read as follows:

Sec.  100.35T09-0327  Special Regulated Areas for summer events;
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan Zone.

    (a) Definition. The term ``Coast Guard Patrol Commander'' means a
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to monitor a
regatta area, permit entry into the regatta area, give legally
enforceable orders to persons or vessels within the regatta area, and
take other actions authorized by the Captain of the Port.
    (b) The following are designated as regulated areas:
    (1) Harborfest Dragon Boat Race; South Haven, MI.
    (i) Location. A regulated area is established on the Black River in
South Haven, MI within the following coordinates starting at
42[deg]24'13.6'' N, 086[deg]16'41'' W; then southeast 42[deg]24'12.6''
N, 086[deg]16'40'' W; then northeast to 42[deg]24'19.2'' N,
086[deg]16'26.5'' W; then northwest to 42[deg]24'20.22'' N,
086[deg]16'27.4'' W; then back to point of origin. (NAD 83).
    (ii) Special Local Regulations. The regulations of Sec.  100.901
apply. No vessel may enter, transit through, or anchor within the
regulated area without the permission of the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander.
    (iii) Effective Date. These regulations are effective on June 22
and 23, 2013 from 6 a.m. until 7 p.m.
    (2) Chinatown Chamber of Commerce Dragon Boat Race; Chicago, IL.
    (i) Location. All waters of the South Branch of the Chicago River
from the West 18th Street Bridge at position 41[deg]51'28'' N,
087[deg]38'06'' W to the Amtrak Bridge at position 41[deg]51'20'' N,
087[deg]38'13'' W. (NAD 83).
    (ii) Special Local Regulations. The regulations of Sec.  100.901
apply. No vessel may enter, transit through, or anchor within the
regulated area without the permission of the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander.
    (iii) Effective Date. These regulations are effective on July 12
and 13, 2013 from 11:30 a.m. until 5 p.m.
    (3) Door County Triathlon; Door County, WI.
    (i) Location. A regulated area is established to include all waters
Horseshoe Bay within a 1000-yard radius from a position at
45[deg]00'52.6'' N, 087[deg]20'6.7'' W. (NAD 83).
    (ii) Special Local Regulations. The regulations of Sec.  100.901
apply. No vessel may enter, transit through, or anchor within the
regulated area without the permission of the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander.
    (iii) Effective Date. These regulations are effective on July 20
and 21, 2013 from 8 a.m. until 9:30 a.m.

    Dated: June 5, 2013.
M.W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2013-14416 Filed 6-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 240 (Thursday, December 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74181-74182]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30069]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR13-15-000]

Dow Pipeline Company; Notice of Petition for Rate Approval

    Take notice that on November 30, 2012, Dow Pipeline Company filed a
petition for rate approval pursuant to Section 284.123(b)(2) of the
Commission's regulations for approval of a new rate applicable to
interruptible transportation service and to revise its Statement of
Operating Conditions, as more fully detailed in the petition.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken,
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public

Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' link on
the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, December 14, 2012.

    Dated: December 7, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-30069 Filed 12-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 61 (Friday, March 31, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16052-16053]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06399]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2016-1081]

Imposition of Conditions of Entry for Certain Vessels Arriving to
the United States From Nauru

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces that it will impose conditions of
entry on vessels arriving from Nauru. Conditions of entry are intended
to protect the United States from vessels arriving from countries that
have been found to have deficient port anti-terrorism measures in
place.

DATES: The policy announced in this notice will become effective April
14, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about this document
call or email Juliet Hudson, International Port Security Evaluation
Division, United States Coast Guard, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The authority for this notice is 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 46 U.S.C. 70110,
and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1(II)(97.f). As
delegated, section 70110 authorizes the Coast Guard to impose
conditions of entry on vessels arriving in U.S. waters from ports that
the Coast Guard has not found to maintain effective anti-terrorism
measures.
    On February 2, 2016 the Coast Guard did not find that ports in
Nauru maintained effective anti-terrorism measures and that Nauru's
legal regime, designated authority oversight, access control and cargo
control are all deficient.
    On March 16, 2016, Nauru was notified of this determination and
given recommendations for improving antiterrorism measures and 90 days
to respond. To date, we cannot confirm that Nauru has corrected the
identified deficiencies.
    Accordingly, beginning April 14, 2017, the conditions of entry
shown in Table 1 will apply to any vessel that visited a port in Nauru
in its last five port calls.

    Table 1--Conditions of Entry for Vessels Visiting Ports in Nauru
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Number                         Each vessel must:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1..................  Implement measures per the vessel's security plan
                      equivalent to Security Level 2 while in a port in
                      Nauru. As defined in the ISPS Code and
                      incorporated herein, ``Security Level 2'' refers
                      to the ``level for which appropriate additional
                      protective security measures shall be maintained
                      for a period of time as a result of heightened
                      risk of a security incident.''
2..................  Ensure that each access point to the vessel is
                      guarded and that the guards have total visibility
                      of the exterior (both landside and waterside) of
                      the vessel while the vessel is in ports in Nauru.
3..................  Guards may be provided by the vessel's crew;
                      however, additional crewmembers should be placed
                      on the vessel if necessary to ensure that limits
                      on maximum hours of work are not exceeded and/or
                      minimum hours of rest are met, or provided by
                      outside security forces approved by the vessel's
                      master and Company Security Officer. As defined in
                      the ISPS Code and incorporated herein, ``Company
                      Security Officer'' refers to the ``person
                      designated by the Company for ensuring that a ship
                      security assessment is carried out; that a ship
                      security plan is developed, submitted for
                      approval, and thereafter implemented and
                      maintained and for liaison with port facility
                      security officers and the ship security officer.''
4..................  Attempt to execute a Declaration of Security while
                      in a port in Nauru.
5..................  Log all security actions in the vessel's security
                      records.
6..................  Report actions taken to the cognizant Coast Guard
                      Captain of the Port (COTP) prior to arrival into
                      U.S. waters.
7..................  In addition, based on the findings of the Coast
                      Guard boarding or examination, the vessel may be
                      required to ensure that each access point to the
                      vessel is guarded by armed, private security
                      guards and that they have total visibility of the
                      exterior (both landside and waterside) of the
                      vessel while in U.S. ports. The number and
                      position of the guards has to be acceptable to the
                      cognizant COTP prior to the vessel's arrival.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following countries currently do not maintain effective anti-
terrorism measures and are therefore subject to conditions of entry:
Cambodia, Cameroon, Comoros, Cote d'Ivoire, Equatorial Guinea, the
Republic of the Gambia, Guinea-Bissau, Iran, Liberia, Libya,
Madagascar, Nauru, Nigeria, Sao Tome and Principe, Syria, Timor-Leste,
Venezuela, and Yemen. This list is also available in a policy notice
available at https://homeport.uscg.mil under the Maritime Security tab;
International Port Security Program (ISPS Code); Port Security Advisory
link.

    Dated: January 30, 2017.
Charles W. Ray,
USCG, Deputy Commandant for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017-06399 Filed 3-30-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


Criteria Pollutants NO2 Petroleum Related Compounds 106990 1,3 Butadiene 71432 Benzene ( including benzene from gasoline) 108883 Toluene 100414 Ethyl benzene 1330207 Xylenes ( isomers and mixture) 95476 o Xylenes 108383 m Xylenes 106423 p Xylenes Process Related Compounds 100425 Styrene 78875 1,2 Dichloropropane 107062 1,2 Dichloroethane 79005 1,1,2 Trichloroethane 108907 Chlorobenzene 71556 1,1,1 Trichloroethane 56235 Carbon tetrachloride Trichloroethene Tetrachloroethene Other Compounds 3 chloropropene 1,1,2 trichloro 1,2,2 trifluoroethane 1,2 dichloro 1,1,1,2 tetrafluoroethane 1,1 dichloroethene cis 1,2 dichloroethene 4 ethyltoluene 1,3,5 trimethylbenzene m dichlorobenzene p dichlorobenzene o dichlorobenzene Trichlorofluoromethane


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 66 (Thursday, April 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14715-14716]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06988]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Noise Exposure Map Notice; Shreveport Regional Airport;
Shreveport, Louisiana

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces its
determination that the noise exposure maps submitted by the Shreveport
Airport Authority for Shreveport Regional Airport are in compliance
with applicable requirements.

DATES:  Effective Date: The effective date of the FAA's determination
on the noise exposure maps is March 23, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  DOT/FAA Southwest Region, Tim Tandy,
Environmental Protection Specialist, ASW-640D, 10101 Hillwood Parkway,
Fort Worth, Texas 76177. Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces that the FAA finds
that the noise exposure maps submitted for Shreveport Regional Airport
are in compliance with applicable requirements of Part 150, effective
March 23, 2018. Under 49 U.S.C. 47503 of the Aviation Safety and Noise
Abatement Act (hereinafter referred to as ``the Act''), an airport
operator may submit to the FAA noise exposure maps which meet
applicable regulations and which depict non-compatible land uses as of
the date of submission of such maps, a description of projected
aircraft operations, and the ways in which such operations will affect
such maps. The Act requires such maps to be developed in consultation
with interested and affected parties in the local community, government
agencies, and persons using the airport. An airport operator who has
submitted noise exposure maps that are found by FAA to be in compliance
with the requirements of Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 150,
promulgated pursuant to the Act, may submit a noise compatibility
program for FAA approval which sets forth the measures the operator has
taken or proposes to take to reduce existing non-compatible uses and
prevent the introduction of additional non-compatible uses. The FAA has
completed its review of the noise exposure maps and accompanying
documentation submitted by Shreveport Airport Authority. The
documentation that constitutes the ``noise exposure maps'' as defined
in section 150.7 of Part 150 includes:
    Chapters 2 and 3 of ``14 CFR Pat 150 Noise Exposure Maps, October
2015''; Exhibit 1 (2014 Noise Exposure Map), Exhibit 2 (2020 Noise
Exposure Map), Exhibit 2-1 (Shreveport Regional Airport and Immediate
Environs), Exhibit 2-1 (Shreveport Regional Airport Aerial View),
Exhibit 2-3 (Instrument Landing System/Localizer Approaches), Exhibit
2-4 (Area Navigation Approaches), Exhibit 3-1 (Runway 6 Arrival Flight
Tracks), Exhibit 3-2 (Runway 6 Departure Flight Tracks), Exhibit 3-3
(Runway 14 Arrival Flight Tracks), Exhibit 3-4 (Runway 14 Departure
Flight Tracks), Exhibit 3-5 (Runway 24 Arrival Flight Tracks), Exhibit
3-6 (Runway 24 Departure Flight Tracks), Exhibit 3-7 (Runway 32 Arrival
Flight Tracks), Exhibit 3-8 (Runway 32 Departure Flight Tracks),
Exhibit 3-9 (Touch and Go Flight Tracks), Exhibit 3-10 (Shreveport
Regional Airport Aircraft Maintenance Runup Areas, Exhibit 3-11 (2014
Noise Exposure), Exhibit 3-12 (2020 Forecast Noise Exposure), Exhibit
3-13 (Comparison of 2004 and 2014 Noise Exposure), Exhibit 3-14
(Comparative Noise Footprints for Six Most Common Aircraft Types--2004
and 2014); Table 2-1 (Current and Recommended Optimum Runway Lengths),
Table 2-2 (Summary of Historical and Forecast Passengers), Table 2-3
(Summary of Historical and Forecast Air Cargo), Table 2-4 (Historical
and Forecast Aircraft Operations), Table 2-5 (Instrument Approach
Procedures at Shreveport Regional Airport), Table 3-1 (Annual Aircraft
Operations by Month--2014), Table 3-2 (Annual Aircraft Operations by
INM Aircraft Type, User Category--2014), Table 3-3 (Calculation of
Normalization Factors for Deriving Annual Operations by Aircraft Type),
Table 3-4 (Aircraft Operations by Aircraft Category, Operation Type,
and Time of Day--2014), Table 3-5 (Average Annual Day Aircraft
Operations by INM Aircraft Type and Time of Day, Itinerant Operations--
2014), Table 3-6 (Average Annual Day Aircraft Operations by INM
Aircraft Type and Time of Day, Local Operations--2014), Table 3-7
(Arrival Runway Use Percentages--2014), Table 3-8 (Departure Runway Use
Percentages--2014), Table 3-9 (Touch and Go Runway Use Percentages--
2014), Table 3-10 (INM Departure Stage Lengths Categories), Table 3-11
(Aircraft Flight Profile Stage Length Percentages by INM Aircraft
Type), Table 3-12 (Engine Maintenance Runup Data Used for Noise
Modeling--2014), Table 3-13 (Annual Operations Summary--2020), Table 3-
14 (Activity Percentage by Aircraft Category, Operation Type, and Time
of Day--2020), Table 3-15 (Annual Aircraft Operations by Aircraft
Category, Operation Type, and Time of Day--2020), Table 3-16 (Average
Annual Day Aircraft Operations by INM Aircraft Type and Time of Day,
Itinerant Operations--2020), Table 3-17 (Average Annual Day Aircraft
Operations by INM Aircraft Type and Time of Day, Local Operations--
2020), Table 3-18 (Departure Stage Length Proportions by Aircraft
Category--2020), Table 3-19 (Engine Maintenance Runup Data Used for
Noise Modeling--2020). The FAA has determined that these noise exposure
maps and accompanying documentation are in compliance with applicable
requirements. This determination is effective on March 23, 2018.
    FAA's determination on an airport operator's noise exposure maps is
limited to a finding that the maps were developed in accordance with
the procedures contained in appendix A of FAR Part 150. Such
determination does not constitute approval of the applicant's data,
information or plans, or a commitment to approve a noise compatibility
program or to fund the implementation of that program. If questions
arise concerning the precise relationship of specific properties to
noise exposure contours depicted on a

noise exposure map submitted under section 47503 of the Act, it should
be noted that the FAA is not involved in any way in determining the
relative locations of specific properties with regard to the depicted
noise contours, or in interpreting the noise exposure maps to resolve
questions concerning, for example, which properties should be covered
by the provisions of section 47506 of the Act. These functions are
inseparable from the ultimate land use control and planning
responsibilities of local government. These local responsibilities are
not changed in any way under Part 150 or through FAA's review of noise
exposure maps. Therefore, the responsibility for the detailed
overlaying of noise exposure contours onto the map depicting properties
on the surface rests exclusively with the airport operator that
submitted those maps, or with those public agencies and planning
agencies with which consultation is required under section 47503 of the
Act. The FAA has relied on the certification by the airport operator,
under section 150.21 of FAR Part 150, that the statutorily required
consultation has been accomplished.
    Copies of the full noise exposure map documentation and of the
FAA's evaluation of the maps are available for examination at the
following locations: Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas; Henry L. Thompson, Director of Airports,
Shreveport Airport Authority, 5103 Hollywood Avenue, Shreveport, LA
71109. Questions may be directed to the individual named above under
the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, March 23, 2018.
Ignacio Flores,
Director, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-06988 Filed 4-4-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 212 (Thursday, November 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66319-66320]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23881]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2022-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2282]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before February 1, 2023.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the
respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2282, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email) [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location
https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities
with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be
identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date
listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Nicholas A. Shufro,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management (Acting), Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Lincoln County, Kansas and Incorporated Areas
          Project: 21-07-0027S Preliminary Date: July 15, 2022
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Barnard........................  City Office, 313 Main Street,
                                          Barnard, KS 67418.
City of Beverly........................  City Office, 203 North Main
                                          Street, Beverly, KS 67423.
City of Lincoln Center.................  City Hall, 153 West Lincoln
                                          Avenue, Lincoln Center, KS
                                          67455.
City of Sylvan Grove...................  City Hall, 118 South Main
                                          Street, Sylvan Grove, KS
                                          67481.
Unincorporated Areas of Lincoln County.  Lincoln County Courthouse, 216
                                          East Lincoln Avenue, Lincoln
                                          Center, KS 67455.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-23881 Filed 11-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 5, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 1720]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00969]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL19-39-000]

Light Power & Gas of NY LLC v. New York Independent System
Operator, Inc.; Notice of Complaint

    Take notice that on January 29, 2018, pursuant to sections 206 and
306 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824e and 825e, and Rule 206 of
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206, Light Power and Gas of NY LLC
(Complainant) filed a formal complaint against New York Independent
System Operator, Inc. (Respondent) alleging that the Respondent
violated its Open Access Transmission Tariff by discriminating against
the Complainant by refusing to process the Complainant's application
for registration to participate in the Respondent's markets, all as
more fully explained in the complaint.
    The Complainant certifies that copies of the complaint were served
on the contacts for the Respondent as listed on the Commission's list
of Corporate Officials.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the website that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 19, 2019.

    Dated: January 29, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-00969 Filed 2-4-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 173 (Friday, September 6, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 46951]
[FR Doc No: 2019-19306]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9999-45-Region 4]

Public Water System Supervision Program Revision for the State of
Mississippi

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of intended approval.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the State of Mississippi is
revising its approved Public Water System Supervision Program.
Mississippi has adopted drinking water regulations for the Revised
Total Coliform Rule. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has
determined that Mississippi's regulations are no less stringent than
the federal rule and the revision otherwise meets applicable Safe
Drinking Water Act requirements. Therefore, EPA intends to approve this
revision to the State of Mississippi's Public Water System Supervision
Program.

DATES: Any interested person may request a public hearing. A request
for a public hearing must be submitted by October 7, 2019, to the
Regional Administrator at the EPA Region 4 street address shown below.
The Regional Administrator may deny frivolous or insubstantial requests
for a hearing. However, if a substantial request for a public hearing
is made by October 7, 2019, a public hearing will be held. If no timely
and appropriate request for a hearing is received and the Regional
Administrator does not elect to hold a hearing on her own motion, this
determination shall become final and effective on October 7, 2019. Any
request for a public hearing shall include the following information:
The name, address, and telephone number of the individual,
organization, or other entity requesting a hearing; a brief statement
of the requesting person's interest in the Regional Administrator's
determination and a brief statement of the information that the
requesting person intends to submit at such hearing; and the signature
of the individual making the request, or, if the request is made on
behalf of an organization or other entity, the signature of a
responsible official of the organization or other entity.

ADDRESSES: Documents relating to this determination are available for
inspection between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday (excluding legal holidays) at the following offices: Bureau of
Public Water Supply, Mississippi State Department of Health, 570 East
Woodrow Wilson Boulevard, Jackson, Mississippi 39215; and the Drinking
Water Section, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale Froneberger, EPA Region 4,
Drinking Water Section, by mail at the Atlanta street address given
above, by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The State of Mississippi has submitted a
request that EPA approve a revision to the State's Safe Drinking Water
Act Public Water System Supervision Program to include the authority to
implement and enforce the Revised Total Coliform Rule. For the request
to be approved, EPA must find the state regulations codified at 15
Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 20, Subpt. 72, Ch. 1, to be no less stringent
than the federal rule codified at 40 CFR part 141. EPA reviewed
Mississippi's application using the federal statutory provisions
(Section 1413 of the Safe Drinking Water Act), federal regulations (at
40 CFR parts 141 and 142), state regulations, state policies and
procedures for implementing the rule, regulatory crosswalk, and EPA
regulatory guidance to determine whether the request for revision is
approvable. EPA determined that the Mississippi regulations are no less
stringent than the corresponding federal rule and the revision
otherwise meets applicable Safe Drinking Water Act requirements.
Therefore, EPA intends to approve this revision. If EPA does not
receive a timely and appropriate request for a hearing and the Regional
Administrator does not elect to hold a hearing on her own motion, this
approval shall become final and effective on October 7, 2019.

    Authority: Section 1413 of the Safe Drinking Water Act, as
amended (1996), and 40 CFR part 142.

    Dated: August 26, 2019.
Mary S. Walker,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2019-19306 Filed 9-5-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 50 (Friday, March 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14502-14503]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05623]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 308-007]

PacifiCorp Energy; Notice of Application Tendered for Filing With
the Commission and Establishing Procedural Schedule for Licensing and
Deadline for Submission of Final Amendments

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Subsequent License (Minor Project).
    b. Project No.: 308-007.
    c. Date Filed: February 28, 2014.
    d. Applicant: PacifiCorp Energy (PacifiCorp).
    e. Name of Project: Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The existing project is located on Royal Purple Creek
and the East and West Forks of the Wallowa River in Wallowa County,
Oregon. The

project would occupy 12.68 acres of Federal land managed by the United
States Forest Service.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791 (a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Russ Howison, Relicensing Project Manager,
PacifiCorp Energy, 825 NE Multnomah, Suite 1500, Portland, OR 97232;
Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Matt Cutlip,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. This application is not ready for environmental analysis at this
time.
    k. The Project Description: The existing Wallowa Falls
Hydroelectric Project consists of the following existing facilities:
(1) A 2-foot-high, 9-foot-long concrete diversion dam with a 1-foot-
wide spillway on Royal Purple Creek; (2) a 240-foot-long, 8-inch-
diameter wood-stave and polyvinylchloride pipeline conveying water from
the Royal Purple Creek diversion dam to a de-silting pond; (3) an 18-
foot-high, 125-foot-long, buttressed rock-filled timber crib dam with
impervious gravel and asphalt core and a 30-foot-wide spillway on the
East Fork Wallowa River; (4) a 0.2-acre de-silting pond; (5) a 2-foot-
high by 2-foot-wide concrete intake structure with a headgate and steel
trash rack; (6) a low-level sluiceway with a steel trash rack and cast
iron gate connecting to a 2-foot-diameter steel pipe passing through
the dam to provide instream flow releases to the bypassed reach; (7) a
5,688-foot-long steel penstock varying in diameter from 24 to 16 inches
and consisting of buried sections or above-ground sections supported on
timber crib trestles; (8) a powerhouse containing one impulse turbine-
generator unit with an installed capacity of 1,100 kilowatts; (9) a 40-
foot-long concrete-lined tailrace which conveys powerhouse flows to a
1,000-foot-long unlined and braided tailrace channel discharging into
the West Fork Wallowa River; (10) a 20-foot-long, 7.2-kilovolt
transmission line which connects to the Wallowa Falls substation; and
(11) appurtenant facilities.
    The project is operated run-of-river. Up to 1 cubic feet per second
(cfs) of flow is diverted from Royal Purple Creek and discharged into
the de-silting pond. Up to 16 cfs of water (i.e., 15 cfs maximum from
East Fork Wallowa River and 1 cfs from Royal Purple Creek) is diverted
through the intake structure at the East Fork Wallow River dam into the
steel penstock and conveyed to the powerhouse where it flows through
the single impulse turbine and discharges through the tailrace into the
West Fork Wallowa River. The project's current license requires a
minimum instream flow release of 0.5 cfs or inflow, whichever is less,
in the bypassed reach. The current license also mandates that
PacifiCorp restrict sediment flushing from the de-silting pond to the
period from May 1 to August 30 to protect kokanee salmon.
    PacifiCorp proposes to modify the existing facilities by
constructing a buried 30-inch-diameter, 1,000-foot-long pipe and
rerouting powerhouse flows from the current discharge location in the
West Fork to the East Fork Wallowa River. PacifiCorp also proposes to:
Increase the minimum flow release in the bypassed reach to 4 cfs or
inflow, whichever is less; modify the sediment management program to
only enable sediment flushing during the high-flow month of June;
upgrade the instream flow compliance monitoring equipment in the
bypassed reach; upgrade recreational facilities at the non-project
Pacific Park Campground; and install new signage and interpretive
displays at the project.
    PacifiCorp proposes to amend the project boundary by adding 28.3
acres to incorporate the Pacific Park Campground, forebay access road,
buried tailrace pipe, and other new project features.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or
may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is
also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item
(h) above.
    m. You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    n. Procedural Schedule:
    The application will be processed according to the following
preliminary Hydro Licensing Schedule. Revisions to the schedule may be
made as appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Milestone                           Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of Acceptance/Notice of Ready     April 2014.
 for Environmental Analysis.
Filing of recommendations, preliminary   June 2014.
 terms and conditions, and fishway
 prescriptions.
Commission issues Draft EA.............  December 2014.
Comments on Draft EA...................  January 2015.
Modified Terms and Conditions..........  March 2015.
Commission Issues Final EA.............  June 2015.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    o. Final amendments to the application must be filed with the
Commission no later than 30 days from the issuance date of the notice
of ready for environmental analysis.

    Dated: March 7, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-05623 Filed 3-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P