[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 145 (Friday, July 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 45778]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16281]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2022-N-0766]

Hospira, Inc., et al.; Withdrawal of Approval of 21 Abbreviated
New Drug Applications; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice
that appeared in the Federal Register on May 20, 2022. The document
announced the withdrawal of approval (as of June 21, 2022) of 21
abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) from multiple applicants. The
document indicated that FDA was withdrawing approval of the following
ANDAs after receiving withdrawal requests from Bionpharma Inc., 600
Alexander Rd., Suite 2-4B, Princeton, NJ 08540: ANDA 065301, Cefadroxil
Tablets, Equivalent to (EQ) 1 gram (g) base; ANDA 065307, Cefadroxil
Oral Suspension, EQ 250 milligrams (mg) base/5 milliliters (mL) and EQ
500 mg base/5 mL; ANDA 065309, Cefadroxil Capsules, EQ 500 mg base;
ANDA 065326, Cephalexin Oral Suspension, EQ 125 mg base/5 mL and EQ 250
mg base/5 mL; from Sunny Pharmtech Inc., 175 SW 166th Ave., Pembroke
Pines, FL 33027: ANDA 203581, Glyburide Tablets, 1.25 mg, 2.5 mg, and 5
mg; and from Unicorn Pharmaceuticals, 5 Links Circle, Durham, NC,
27707: ANDA 204137, Omeprazole and Sodium Bicarbonate Capsules, 20 mg;
1.1 g. Before FDA withdrew the approval of these ANDAs, Bionpharma
Inc., Sunny Pharmtech Inc., and Unicorn Pharmaceuticals informed FDA
that they did not want the approval of the ANDAs withdrawn. Because
Bionpharma Inc. timely requested that approval of ANDAs 065301, 065307,
065309, and 065326 not be withdrawn, the approvals are still in effect.
Because Sunny Pharmtech Inc. timely requested that ANDA 203581 not be
withdrawn, the approval is still in effect. Because Unicorn
Pharmaceuticals timely requested that ANDA 204137 not be withdrawn, the
approval is still in effect.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Nguyen, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 75, Rm. 1676, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-6980, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of Friday, May 20,
2022 (87 FR 30962), in FR Doc. 2022-10924, the following correction is
made:
    On page 30963, in the table, the entries for ANDAs 065301, 065307,
065309, 065326, 203581, and 204137 are removed.

    Dated: July 25, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-16281 Filed 7-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 239 (Thursday, December 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86715-86718]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27401]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-99124; File No. SR-BX-2023-033]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its GPS
Antenna Fees at General 8, Section 1

December 8, 2023.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on November 29, 2023, Nasdaq BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below,
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's GPS antenna fees at
General 8, Section 1, as described further below. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/bx/rules, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

Purpose \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed pricing changes on
September 29, 2023 with an effective date of October 1, 2023 (SR-BX-
2023-025). On November 15, 2023, the Exchange withdrew SR-BX-2023-
025 and replaced with SR-BX-2023-030. The instant filing replaces
SR-BX-2023-030, which was withdrawn on November 29, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange offers a GPS antenna, which allows co-location
customers \4\ to synchronize their time recording systems to the U.S.
Government's Global Positioning System (``GPS'') network time (the
``Service''). The Exchange proposes to modify its monthly fees for the
Service at General 8, Section 1(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange offers customers the opportunity to co-locate
their servers and equipment within the Exchange's primary data
center, located in Carteret, New Jersey.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    GPS network time is the atomic time scale implemented by the atomic
clocks in the GPS ground control stations and GPS satellites. Each GPS
satellite contains multiple atomic clocks that contribute precise time
data to the GPS signals. GPS receivers decode these signals,
synchronizing the receivers to the atomic clocks. A GPS antenna serves
as a time signal receiver and feeds a primary clock device the GPS
network time using precise time data. Firms can use the precise time
data provided by the GPS antenna to time-stamp transactional
information.
    Time synchronization services are well established in the U.S. and
utilized in many areas of the U.S. economy and infrastructure. The
Service is not novel to the securities markets, or to the Exchange.
    The Exchange offers connectivity to a GPS antenna via two options,
over shared infrastructure or a dedicated antenna. If a firm wishes to
connect via a dedicated connection, it must supply the antenna
hardware.
    The Exchange currently charges a monthly fee of $200 for the
Service, which applies to both the shared infrastructure option and the
dedicated antenna option. The Exchange proposes to increase the monthly
fee to $600 for the Service, which would apply to both the shared
infrastructure option and the dedicated antenna option. As such, the
Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule at General 8, Section 1(d)
to reflect the increased monthly fee for the GPS antenna. The Exchange
has not raised such price since the monthly fee of $200 was adopted in
2010.\5\ In addition, the Exchange charges a higher monthly fee of $350
for cross-connections to approved telecommunication carriers in the
data center and for inter-cabinet connections to other co-location
customers in the data center, despite the fact that the Service not
only provides connectivity (like the cross-connections), but also
provides data (i.e., the network time) to co-location customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62396 (June 28,
2010), 75 FR 38585 (July 2, 2010) (SR-BX-2010-012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange's fee schedule at General 8, Section 1(d)
currently states that the installation fee for the GPS antenna is
installation specific. The Exchange proposes to add specific
installation amounts for the Service within the fee schedule, providing
greater transparency to market participants. Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to charge an installation fee of $900 for connectivity to a
GPS antenna over shared infrastructure and $1,500 for connectivity to a
GPS antenna over a dedicated antenna.\6\ The difference in installation
costs reflects the differing levels of complexity. For the dedicated
antenna option, installation involves installing an antenna on the roof
whereas the shared option involves extending a cable from a device
located inside the data center.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ NYSE provides a similar service for a $3,000 initial charge
plus a $400 monthly charge. See https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/Wireless_Connectivity_Fees_and_Charges.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Service is an optional product available to any firm that
chooses to subscribe. Firms may cancel their subscription at any time.
The Service simply provides time synchronization that may be utilized
by firms to adjust their own time systems and time-stamp transactional
information. The GPS antenna is offered on a completely voluntary
basis. No customer is required to purchase the GPS antenna. Potential
subscribers may subscribe to the Service only if they voluntarily
choose to do so. It is a business decision of each firm

whether to subscribe to the Service or not. Furthermore, firms have an
array of options for time synchronization. Firms may purchase the
Service (or enhanced time synchronization services) from other
vendors.\7\ Customers do not receive an advantage by purchasing the
Service from the Exchange rather than another provider. The Exchange is
merely providing access to GPS signals, which can also be accessed via
other providers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ For example, Pico, Guava Tech, and SFTI provide time
synchronization services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to cost, a firm's decision regarding which, if any,
time synchronization option to purchase may depend, among other
factors, on whether it wants to build or buy a time feed as well as the
design of a firm's systems. A firm may prefer to build out its own time
feed using GPS network time (as provided by the Exchange or a third-
party vendor) or purchase a time synchronization service that handles
the time feed for them. Examples of enhanced time synchronization
include Precision Time Protocol (``PTP''), Pulse Per Second Time
Synchronization Protocol (``PPS''), and Network Time Protocol
(``NTP''), each of which are feeds that a client can consume rather
than creating a feed itself. Such a choice may depend on a firm's
desire for control of the feed, time sensitivity, and trade strategy,
including whether a firm uses such time information to trigger trading
decisions, as well as other considerations such as cost and
convenience. In addition, with respect to the design of a firm's
systems, a firm may choose to have its time synchronization equipment
centralized or in multiple locations. Third-party vendors may be
situated in Carteret or other New York metro financial data centers.
Clients and vendors alike can produce a time feed in Carteret or any of
the other locations.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ As needed, firms and vendors use latency between the data
centers to adjust their time synchronization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Approximately 59% of the Exchange's co-location customers subscribe
to the Service, most of which opt for the shared option. The fact that
approximately 41% of the Exchange's co-location customers do not
subscribe to the Service demonstrate that there are alternative options
available.
    If the Exchange is incorrect in its determination that the proposed
fees reflect the value of the GPS antenna, customers will not purchase
the product or will seek other options at their disposal, such as
purchasing time synchronization services from third-party vendors.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\9\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is
not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed change to the pricing schedule is reasonable in
several respects. As a threshold matter, the Exchange is subject to
significant competitive forces in the market for order flow, which
constrains its pricing determinations. The fact that the market for
order flow is competitive has long been recognized by the courts. In
NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit
stated, ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is
`fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of
order flow from broker dealers' . . . .'' \11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See NetCoalition, 615 F.3d at 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (quoting
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR
74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their
preference for competition over regulatory intervention to determine
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues, and also recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Congress directed the Commission to ``rely on `competition,
whenever possible, in meeting its regulatory responsibilities for
overseeing the SROs and the national market system.' '' \13\ As a
result, the Commission has historically relied on competitive forces to
determine whether a fee proposal is equitable, fair, reasonable, and
not unreasonably or unfairly discriminatory. ``If competitive forces
are operative, the self-interest of the exchanges themselves will work
powerfully to constrain unreasonable or unfair behavior.'' \14\
Accordingly, ``the existence of significant competition provides a
substantial basis for finding that the terms of an exchange's fee
proposal are equitable, fair, reasonable, and not unreasonably or
unfairly discriminatory.'' \15\ In its 2019 guidance on fee proposals,
Commission staff indicated that they would look at factors beyond the
competitive environment, such as cost, only if a ``proposal lacks
persuasive evidence that the proposed fee is constrained by significant
competitive forces.'' \16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See NetCoalition, 615 F.3d at 534-35; see also H.R. Rep.
No. 94-229 at 92 (1975) (``[I]t is the intent of the conferees that
the national market system evolve through the interplay of
competitive forces as unnecessary regulatory restrictions are
removed.'').
    \14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-21).
    \15\ Id.
    \16\ See U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, ``Staff
Guidance on SRO Rule filings Relating to Fees'' (May 21, 2019),
available at https://www.sec.gov/tm/staff-guidance-sro-rule-filings-fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed fees are reasonable and unlikely to burden the market
because the purchase of the Service is optional for all categories of
co-location customers. No firms are required to purchase the Service.
Though many firms use GPS network time to synchronize their internal
primary clock devices, firms can purchase time sync services from
third-party vendors. Firms are also free to utilize other services that
may assist them in enhanced time synchronization of their systems by
consuming time feeds, such as PTP, PPS, and NTP. As noted above,
approximately 59% of the Exchange's co-location customers subscribe to
the Service, most of which opt for the shared option. The fact that
approximately 41% of the Exchange's co-location customers do not
subscribe to the Service demonstrate that there are alternative options
available. Firms may choose to purchase multiple time synchronization
services for resiliency or otherwise.\17\ For example, a decision to
purchase multiple synchronization services could be based on client
strategy, as some strategies require more

precise time than others. As described above, in addition to cost, a
firm's decision regarding which, if any, time synchronization option to
purchase may depend, among other factors, on whether a firm wishes to
build or buy a time feed, the design of a firm's systems, including
whether a firm chooses to have its time synchronization equipment
centralized or in multiple locations, a firm's time sensitivity, a
firm's trading strategy, including whether it uses such time
information to trigger trading decisions, and a firm's desire for
control of the time feed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Of the Exchange's co-location customers that subscribe to
the Service, approximately 9% of such co-location customers purchase
both the dedicated and the shared options of the Service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange offers the Service as a convenience to firms to
provide them with the ability to synchronize their own primary clock
devices to the GPS network time and time-stamp transactional
information.\18\ Customers do not receive an advantage by purchasing
the Service from the Exchange rather than another provider. The
Exchange is merely providing access to GPS signals, which can also be
accessed via other providers. Firms that choose to subscribe to the
Service may discontinue the use of the Service at any time if they
determine that the time synchronization services provided via the GPS
antenna are no longer useful. In sum, co-location customers can
discontinue the use of the Service at any time, decide not to
subscribe, or use a third-party vendor for time synchronization
services, for any reason, including the fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ In offering the Service as a convenience to firms, the
Exchange incurs certain costs, including costs related to the data
center facility, hardware and equipment, and personnel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The optional Service is available to all co-location customers that
choose to subscribe. The proposed fees would apply to all co-location
customers on a non-discriminatory basis, and therefore are not designed
to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or
dealers.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposed changes to include
specific installation fees promote just and equitable principles of
trade and remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market system because the proposed rule
changes will provide greater clarity to Members and the public
regarding the Exchange's fees. It is in the public interest for rules
to be accurate and transparent so as to eliminate the potential for
confusion.
    If the Exchange is incorrect in its determination that the proposed
fees reflect the value of the GPS antenna, customers will not purchase
the product or will seek other options at their disposal, such as
purchasing time synchronization services from third-party vendors.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    In terms of inter-market competition (the competition among self-
regulatory organizations), the Exchange notes that it operates in a
highly competitive market in which market participants can readily
favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to
be excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually
adjust its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and with
alternative trading systems that have been exempted from compliance
with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges. Because
competitors are free to modify their own fees in response, the Exchange
believes that the degree to which fee changes in this market may impose
any burden on competition is extremely limited. Approval of the
proposal does not impose any burden on the ability of other exchanges
to compete. As noted above, time synchronization services are offered
by other vendors and any exchange has the ability to offer such
services if it so chooses.
    Nothing in the proposal burdens intra-market competition (the
competition among consumers of exchange data) because the GPS antenna
is available to any co-location customer under the same fees as any
other co-location customer, and any co-location customer that wishes to
purchase a GPS antenna can do so on a non-discriminatory basis.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-BX-2023-033 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

    All submissions should refer to file number SR-BX-2023-033. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number

SR-BX-2023-033 and should be submitted on or before January 4, 2024.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-27401 Filed 12-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 139 (Thursday, July 19, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34074-34076]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15305]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0647; Product Identifier 2017-SW-083-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited
Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited (Bell) Model 429 helicopters.
This proposed AD would revise the life limit for the nose landing gear
(NLG) assembly. This proposed AD is prompted by revised airworthiness
limitations determined by Bell. The actions of this proposed AD are
intended to prevent an unsafe condition on these helicopters.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 17,
2018.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0647; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this proposed AD, the Transport Canada AD, the economic evaluation, any
comments received, and other information. The street address for Docket
Operations (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
    For service information identified in this proposed rule, contact
Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited, 12,800 Rue de l'Avenir,
Mirabel, Quebec J7J1R4; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
(450) 433-0272; or at http://www.bellcustomer.com/files/. You may
review the referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Fuller, Senior Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to
the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might
result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed
electronically, commenters should submit only one time.
    We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as
a report summarizing each substantive

public contact with FAA personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking.
Before acting on this proposal, we will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for comments. We will consider
comments filed after the comment period has closed if it is possible to
do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change this proposal
in light of the comments we receive.

Discussion

    Transport Canada, which is the aviation authority for Canada, has
issued Canadian AD No. CF-2016-07, dated March 4, 2016, to correct an
unsafe condition for Bell Model 429 helicopters with wheeled landing
gear. Transport Canada advises that Bell has replaced the airworthiness
limitations for the NLG main fitting to bell crank bolt part number (P/
N) M084-20H125-101 and NLG main fitting P/N M084-20H011-107 with an
airworthiness limitation for the next higher assembly, NLG assembly P/N
429-336-100-101. According to Transport Canada, the NLG assembly's life
limit is reduced to 50,000 retirement index number (RIN) or 4,500 hours
time-in-service (TIS). Transport Canada advises that failure to replace
components prior to established airworthiness limitations could result
in an unsafe condition.

FAA's Determination

    These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
Canada and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with Canada, Transport Canada, its technical
representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in
its AD. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all known
relevant information and determined that an unsafe condition is likely
to exist or develop on other helicopters of the same type design.

Related Service Information

    We reviewed Bell Alert Service Bulletin No. 429-15-24, Revision A,
dated September 23, 2015, which specifies updating the Bell 429
maintenance manual with Revision 24 to incorporate the revised
airworthiness limitations for the NLG assembly, NLG main fitting to
bellcrank bolt, and the NLG main fitting.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would revise the life limit of the NLG assembly by
requiring, before further flight, removing from service any NLG
assembly P/N 429-336-100-101 that has reached or exceeded 4,500 hours
TIS or 50,000 RIN. Thereafter, this proposed AD would require removing
from service each NLG assembly P/N 429-336-100-101 before it
accumulates 4,500 hours TIS or 50,000 RIN, whichever occurs first.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Transport Canada AD

    The Transport Canada AD applies to certain serial-numbered
helicopters, whereas this proposed AD would apply to all Bell Model 429
helicopters with the affected NLG assembly installed.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect less than 75
helicopters of U.S. Registry (as this proposed AD would not apply to
Bell Model 429 helicopters with skid landing gear). At an average labor
rate of $85 per hour, replacing a NLG assembly would require 10 work-
hours, and required parts would cost $104,648, for a cost of $105,498
per helicopter and up to $7,912,350 for the U.S. fleet.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited: Docket No. FAA-2018-0647;
Product Identifier 2017-SW-083-AD.

(a) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited Model
429 helicopters with a nose landing gear (NLG) assembly part number
(P/N) 429-336-100-101 installed, certificated in any category.

(b) Unsafe Condition

    This AD defines the unsafe condition as fatigue failure of an
NLG assembly, which could result in subsequent damage to and loss of
control of the helicopter.

(c) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by September 17, 2018.

(d) Compliance

    You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.

(e) Required Actions

    Before further flight, remove from service any NLG assembly P/N
429-336-100-101 that has reached or exceeded 4,500 hours time-in-
service (TIS) or 50,000 retirement index number (RIN). Thereafter,
remove from service each NLG assembly P/N 429-336-100-101 before
accumulating 4,500 hours

TIS or 50,000 RIN, whichever occurs first. For purposes of this AD,
for every normal retraction or extension of the wheeled landing gear
system, add one RIN.

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Safety Management Section, Rotorcraft Standards
Branch, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to:
Matt Fuller, Senior Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management
Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy.,
Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].
    (2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.

(g) Additional Information

    (1) Bell Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin No. 429-15-24,
Revision A, dated September 23, 2015, which is not incorporated by
reference, contains additional information about the subject of this
AD. For service information identified in this AD, contact Bell
Helicopter Textron Canada Limited, 12,800 Rue de l'Avenir, Mirabel,
Quebec J7J1R4; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (450)
433-0272; or at http://www.bellcustomer.com/files/. You may review
the referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-
321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
    (2) The subject of this AD is addressed in Transport Canada AD
No. CF-2016-07, dated March 4, 2016. You may view the Transport
Canada AD on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov in the AD
Docket.

(h) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 3200 Nose Landing
Gear.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 9, 2018.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-15305 Filed 7-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


TRI On site and Off site Reported Releases ( in grams), All Facilities ( of 137) for facilities in Chemicals ( SIC 28), Dioxin and Dioxin like compounds ( list 2000,

threshold 0.1 grams), U. S., 2001 Rank Facility City State Total Air Emissions Surface Water Discharges Undergroun d Injection Releases to Land Total On site Releases Total Off site Releases Total Onand Off site Releases Titanium dioxide manufacturers 1.00 Du Pont Edge Moor Edgemoor DE 0.26 17.73 0.00 5,831.97 5,849.96 70,859.59 76,709.55 2.00 Du Pont Delisle Plant Pass Christian MS 0.51 0.00 0.00 18,200.64 18,201.15 0.04 18,201.20 4.00 Du Pont Johnsonville Plant New Johnsonville TN 0.06 14.30 0.00 8,929.53 8,943.89 0.01 8,943.90 12.00 Kerr mcgee Pigments ( Savannah) Inc. Savannah GA 0.30 0.47 0.00 322.08 322.85 0.00 322.85 13.00 Kerr mcgee Chemical L. l. c. Pigment Plant Hamilton MS 0.20 0.00 0.00 263.00 263.20 0.00 263.20 15.00 Louisiana Pigment Co. L. p. Westlake LA 0.15 0.20 0.00 217.19 217.53 0.00 217.53 19.00 Millennium Inorganic Chemicals Ashtabula Plant 1 Ashtabula OH 0.00 0.15 0.00 97.97 98.12 0.00 98.12 21.00 Millennium Inorganic Chemicals Inc. Hawkins Point Plant Baltimore MD 0.04 0.84 0.00 58.71 59.59 0.00 59.59 24.00 Millennium Inorganic Chemicals Ashtabula Plant 2 Ashtabula OH 0.05 0.12 0.00 31.51 31.68 0.00 31.68 Other Chemical Manufacturers 3.00 Dow Chemical Co. Freeport Freeport TX 124.93 708.46 83.82 13,353.40 14,270.61 0.00 14,270.61 5.00 Oxy Vinyls L. p. La Porte Vcm Plant La Porte TX 0.88 2.20 0.00 0.00 3.08 6,788.91 6,791.99 6.00 Gb Biosciences Corp. Houston TX 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 6,626.03 6,631.03 7.00 Dow Chemical Co. Louisiana Div. Plaquemine LA 1.84 512.20 0.00 512.20 1,026.24 0.00 1,026.24 8.00 Dow Chemical Co. Midland Ops. Midland MI 1.10 2.56 0.00 729.90 733.57 0.00 733.57 9.00 Georgia Gulf Chemicals & Vinyls L. l. c. Plaquemine LA 2.63 0.54 0.00 168.20 171.38 429.67 601.04 10.00 Formosa Plastics Corp. Louisiana Baton Rouge LA 58.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.00 492.00 550.00 11.00 Occidental Chemical Corp. Gregory TX 94.40 1.60 0.00 0.00 96.00 260.00 356.00 14.00 Borden Chemicals & Plastics Operating L. p. Geismar LA 3.16 0.46 0.04 0.00 3.66 214.07 217.74 16.00 Westlake Vinyls Inc. Calvert City KY 0.57 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.59 186.10 186.69 17.00 Formosa Plastics Corp. Texas Point Comfort TX 1.47 . 0.00 0.00 1.47 173.29 174.76 Rank Facility City State Total Air Emissions Surface Water Discharges Undergroun d Injection Releases to Land Total On site Releases Total Off site Releases Total Onand Off site Releases 18.00 Ppg Inds. Inc. Lake Charles LA 1.33 42.08 0.00 0.00 43.41 85.31 128.72 20.00 Vulcan Chemicals Wichita KS 17.27 . 63.75 0.00 81.02 0.00 81.02 22.00 Oxy Vinyls L. p. Deer Park Vcm Plant Deer Park TX 51.40 . 0.00 0.00 51.40 4.10 55.50 23.00 Du Pont Sabine River Works Orange TX 0.23 . 0.00 0.00 0.23 32.93 33.16 25.00 Occidental Chemical Corp. Hahnville LA 0.00 14.37 0.00 0.00 14.37 2.84 17.20 26.00 Ashta Chemicals Inc. Ashtabula OH 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.00 17.00 27.00 Ge Co. Silicone Prods. Waterford NY 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 15.84 15.85 28.00 Oxy Vinyls L. p.  Deer Park C/ a Deer Park TX 0.00 13.92 0.00 0.00 13.92 1.86 15.78 29.00 Occidental Chemical Corp. Mobile AL 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.04 12.66 12.70 30.00 Eastman Tennessee Ops. Kingsport TN 3.97 . 0.00 5.85 9.82 0.00 9.82 31.00 Shell Chemical Co. Deer Park Deer Park TX 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.08 8.08 32.00 Occidental Chemical Corp. Muscle Shoals AL 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.05 5.33 5.38 33.00 Ppg Inds. Inc. New Martinsville WV 0.71 2.81 0.00 0.00 3.51 0.81 4.32 34.00 Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L. l. c. Westlake LA 3.64 . 0.00 0.00 3.64 0.00 3.64 35.00 Ppg Inds. Ohio Inc. Circleville Circleville OH 2.95 . 0.00 0.00 2.95 0.13 3.07 36.00 Pcs Nitrogen Fertilizer L. p. Augusta GA 0.00 2.97 0.00 0.00 2.97 0.00 2.97 37.00 Bayer Corp. New Martinsville WV 2.70 . 0.00 0.00 2.70 0.00 2.70 38.00 Resolution Performance Prods. Norco LA 2.40 . 0.00 0.00 2.40 0.00 2.40 39.00 Vulcan Materials Co. Chemicals Div. Geismar LA 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 2.32 2.37 40.00 Du Pont Victoria Plant Victoria TX 1.84 . 0.00 0.00 1.84 0.00 1.84 41.00 Occidental Chemical Corp. Convent LA 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.74 1.08 1.82 42.00 Sasol N. a. Inc. Lake Charles Chemical Complex Westlake LA 0.01 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.31 1.50 1.81 43.00 Cytec Inds. Inc. Wallingford CT 0.34 1.30 0.00 0.00 1.64 0.00 1.64 44.00 Basf Corp. Freeport TX 1.43 . 0.00 0.00 1.43 0.00 1.43 45.00 Eastman Chemical Co. Texas Ops. Longview TX 1.23 . 0.00 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.23 46.00 Du Pont Chambers Works Deepwater NJ 0.00 0.11 0.00 1.02 1.13 0.00 1.13 47.00 Du Pont Seaford Plant Seaford DE 0.18 . 0.00 0.94 1.12 0.00 1.12 Rank Facility City State Total Air Emissions Surface Water Discharges Undergroun d Injection Releases to Land Total On site Releases Total Off site Releases Total Onand Off site Releases 48.00 Eastman Chemical Co. Arkansas Ops. Batesville AR 1.08 . 0.00 0.00 1.08 0.00 1.08 49.00 Lyondell Chemical Co. Channelview TX 1.00 . 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 50.00 Du Pont Washington Works Washington WV 0.38 . 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.55 0.93 51.00 Solutia Inc. Decatur Al Decatur AL 0.91 . 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.00 0.91 52.00 Basf Corp. Wilmington NC 0.84 . 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 53.00 Rubicon Inc. Geismar LA 0.65 . 0.09 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.74 54.00 Velsicol Chemical Corp. Memphis TN 0.67 . 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.67 55.00 Rhodia Inc. Baton Rouge LA 0.65 . 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.65 56.00 Clinton Labs. Clinton IN 0.16 0.02 0.00 0.44 0.61 0.02 0.63 57.00 Dak Americas L. l. c. Cape Fear Site Leland NC 0.16 . 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.42 0.59 58.00 U. s. Army Radford Army Ammunition Plant Radford VA 0.57 . 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.57 59.00 Merck Sharp & Dohme Química De Pr Barceloneta PR 0.57 . 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.57 60.00 Huntsman Corp. C4/ o& o Facilities Port Neches TX 0.56 . 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.56 61.00 Occidental Chemical Corp. Niagara Plant Niagara Falls NY 0.02 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.43 0.56 62.00 Exxonmobil Chemical Baton Rouge Chemical Plant Baton Rouge LA 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.48 63.00 Ge Plastics Mt. Vernon Inc. Mount Vernon IN 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.44 64.00 Arteva Specialties S. a. r. l. Wilmington NC 0.42 . 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.42 65.00 Honeywell Intl. Inc. Hopewell Plant Hopewell VA 0.39 . 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.39 66.00 Williams Ethanol Services Inc. Pekin IL 0.38 . 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.38 67.00 Westvaco Corp. Deridder LA 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.37 68.00 Clariant Lsm ( Missouri) Inc. Springfield MO 0.37 . 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.37 69.00 Equistar Chemicals L. p. Channelview TX 0.35 . 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.35 70.00 Lonza Inc. Conshohocke n PA 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.35 71.00 Eastman Chemical Co. Voridian Div. Cayce west Columbia SC 0.33 . 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.33 72.00 Aventis Cropscience Usa L. p. Institute WV 0.32 . 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.32 73.00 Calgon Carbon Corp. Neville Island Plant Pittsburgh PA 0.31 . 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.31 Rank Facility City State Total Air Emissions Surface Water Discharges Undergroun d Injection Releases to Land Total On site Releases Total Off site Releases Total Onand Off site Releases 74.00 Huntsman Corp. Po/ mtbe Plant Port Neches TX 0.30 . 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.30 75.00 Celanese Acetate L. l. c. Celriver Plant Rock Hill SC 0.30 . 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.30 76.00 Hercules Inc. Brunswick Ga Brunswick GA 0.30 . 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.30 77.00 Formosa Plastics Corp. Delaware City DE 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.30 78.00 Calgon Carbon Corp. Catlettsburg KY 0.29 . 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.29 79.00 Lenzing Fibers Corp. Lowland TN 0.27 . 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.27 80.00 Du Pont Camden Plant Lugoff SC 0.25 . 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 81.00 Occidental Chemical Corp. Castle Hayne NC 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 82.00 Imc Chemicals Inc. Trona CA 0.23 . 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.23 83.00 Cognis Corp. Cincinnati Plant Cincinnati OH 0.22 . 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.22 84.00 Lyondell Chemical Co. Westlake LA 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.19 85.00 Rhodia Inc. Hammond IN 0.19 . 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.19 86.00 Monsanto Muscatine Ia Muscatine IA 0.19 . 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.19 87.00 Missouri Chemical Works Louisiana MO 0.18 . 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.18 88.00 Sunoco Inc. Frankford Plant Philadelphia PA 0.17 . 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.17 89.00 Dow Corning Corp. Carrollton KY 0.00 . 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.16 90.00 Dupont Dow Elastomers L. l. c. Pontchartrain Site La Place LA 0.16 . 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.16 91.00 Akzo Nobel Resins Inc. Baxley GA 0.15 . 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.15 92.00 Pfizer Inc. Groton Site Groton CT 0.15 . 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.15 93.00 Cyro Inds. Wallingford CT 0.15 . 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.15 94.00 Du Pont Waynesboro Plant Waynesboro VA 0.15 . 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.15 95.00 Basf Corp. Geismar LA 0.14 . 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.14 96.00 Albemarle Corp. Orangeburg SC 0.14 . 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.14 97.00 Tippecanoe Labs. Lafayette IN 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.14 98.00 Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. Kalamazoo MI 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.12 99.00 Abbott Labs. North Chicago Facility North Chicago IL 0.11 . 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.11 100.00 Arteva Specialties ( Dba Kosa ) Salisbury Plant Salisbury NC 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.11 Rank Facility City State Total Air Emissions Surface Water Discharges Undergroun d Injection Releases to Land Total On site Releases Total Off site Releases Total Onand Off site Releases 101.00 Basf Corp. Hannibal Plant Palmyra MO 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.11 102.00 Du Pont Chattanooga Plant Chattanooga TN 0.11 . 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.11 103.00 Fmc Corp. Baltimore MD 0.10 . 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10 104.00 Dak Americas L. l. c. Cooper River Plant Charleston SC 0.09 . 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.09 105.00 Atofina Petrochemicals Inc. La Porte TX 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 106.00 Nation Ford Chemical Co. Fort Mill SC 0.08 . 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 107.00 Sasol N. a. Baltimore MD 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 108.00 Horsehead Resource Development Co. Inc. Palmerton PA 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.06 109.00 Cypress Chemical Co. Helena AR 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.06 0.00 0.06 110.00 Georgia Gulf Chemicals & Vinyls L. l. c.

Pasadena Pasadena TX 0.03 . 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.03 111.00 Syngenta Crop Protection Inc. St. Gabriel Facility Saint Gabriel LA 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.03 112.00 Horsehead Resource Development Co. Inc. Chicago IL 0.02 . 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 113.00 Occidental Chemical Corp. New Castle DE 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 114.00 Horsehead Resource Development Co. Inc. Rockwood TN 0.01 . 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 115.00 Westvaco Virginia Inc. Wickliffe KY 0.01 . 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 116.00 Clariant Corp. Coventry RI 0.01 . 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 117.00 Noveon Inc. Louisville KY 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 118.00 Westvaco Virginia Inc. Chemical Div. Covington VA 0.01 . 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 119.00 Westvaco Corp. N. Charleston Chemical Plant North Charleston SC 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 120.00 Clariant Lsm America Inc. Elgin SC 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 121.00 Solutia Inc. Delaware Riverplant Bridgeport NJ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 122.00 Amvac Chemical Corp. Los Angeles CA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 123.00 Horsehead Resource Development Co. Inc. Rose City TX 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 124.00 Du Pont Kinston Plant Kinston NC 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 Intac Automotive Prods. Inc. Lemont IL 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 126.00 Albaugh Inc. Saint Joseph MO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Rank Facility City State Total Air Emissions Surface Water Discharges Undergroun d Injection Releases to Land Total On site Releases Total Off site Releases Total Onand Off site Releases 127.00 Cognis Corp. Kankakee IL 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 128.00 Exxonmobil Chemical Co. Baytown Olefins Plant Baytown TX 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 129.00 Du Pont Memphis Plant Memphis TN 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 Exxonmobil Chemical Co. Baytown Chemical Plant Baytown TX 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 131.00 Exxonmobil Oil Corp. ( Dba Mobil Chemical Co.) Beaumont TX 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 132.00 Exxonmobil Oil Corp. ( Dba Mobil Chemical Co.) Beaumont TX 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 133.00 Monsanto Luling Luling LA 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 134.00 Morton Salt Co. Rittman OH 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 135.00 Pcs Nitrogen Fertilizer L. p. Millington TN 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 136.00 Shell Norco Chemical Plant East Site Norco LA 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 137.00 Shell Norco Chemical Plant West Site Norco LA 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total ( SIC 28) 405.03 1,340.96 147.70 48,724.77 50,618.46 86,223.59 136,842.05 % of total releases 14.03% 72.45% 99.70% 92.33% 87.79% 94.65% 91.99%

Total ( All industries) 2,887.56 1,850.87 148.15 52,771.40 57,657.99 91,100.80 148,758.79 Total ( TiO2 manufacture) 1.58 33.80 0.00 33,952.60 33,987.98 70,859.64 104,847.62 % of total releases 0.05% 1.83% 0.00% 64.34% 58.95% 77.78% 70.48%


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 23 (Friday, February 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5610-5611]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2403]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-66270; File No. SR-FINRA-2012-006]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Extend the Effective Date of the Trading Pause
Pilot

January 30, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on January 24, 2012, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA Rule 6121 (Trading Halts Due to
Extraordinary Market Volatility) to extend the effective date of the
pilot, which is currently scheduled to expire on January 31, 2012,
until July 31, 2012.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on FINRA's Web
site at http://www.finra.org, at the principal office of FINRA and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    FINRA proposes to amend FINRA Rule 6121.01 to extend the effective
date of the pilot by which such rule operates, which is currently
scheduled to expire on January 31, 2012, until July 31, 2012.
    FINRA Rule 6121.01 provides that if a primary listing market has
issued an individual stock trading pause under its rules, FINRA will
halt trading otherwise than on an exchange in that security until
trading has resumed on the primary listing market. The pilot was
developed and implemented as a market-wide initiative by FINRA and
other self-regulatory organizations (``SROs'') in consultation with
Commission staff, and is currently applicable to all NMS stocks (other
than rights and warrants) and specified exchange-traded products
covered by the trading pause pilot rules of a primary listing
market.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65819 (November 23,
2011), 76 FR 74105 (November 30, 2011) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of File No. SR-FINRA-2011-068).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The extension proposed herein would allow the pilot to continue to
operate without interruption while FINRA, the other SROs and the
Commission further assess the effect of the pilot on the marketplace or
whether other initiatives should be adopted in lieu of the current
pilot.
    FINRA has filed the proposed rule change for immediate
effectiveness and has requested that the SEC waive the requirement that
the proposed rule change not become operative for 30 days after the
date of the filing, such that FINRA can implement the proposed rule
change immediately.
2. Statutory Basis
    FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\4\ which requires, among
other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. FINRA believes that the proposed rule change meets
these requirements in that it promotes uniformity across markets
concerning decisions to pause trading in a security when there are
significant price movements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, extension of the pilot to July 31, 2012 would allow
the pilot to continue to operate without interruption while FINRA, the
other SROs and the Commission further assess the effect of the pilot on
the marketplace or whether other initiatives should be adopted in lieu
of the current pilot.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    FINRA has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \5\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\6\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \6\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires FINRA to give the Commission written notice of its intent
to file the proposed rule change along with a brief description and
text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior
to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter
time as designated by the Commission. FINRA has satisfied this
requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \9\ normally
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing.
However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \10\ the Commission may
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. FINRA has asked the
Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal may
become operative immediately upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, as
it will allow the pilot program to continue uninterrupted, thereby
avoiding the investor confusion that could result from a temporary
interruption in the

pilot program. For this reason, the Commission designates the proposed
rule change to be operative upon filing.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-FINRA-2012-006 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-FINRA-2012-006. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-FINRA-2012-006 and should be
submitted on or before February 24, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-2403 Filed 2-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 236 (Wednesday, December 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76560-76563]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31011]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2015-0001]

Final Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Final Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Flood hazard determinations, which may include additions or
modifications of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
regulatory floodways on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and where
applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports have
been made final for the communities listed in the table below.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that a community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA's)
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS
report are used by insurance agents and others to calculate appropriate
flood insurance premium rates for buildings and the contents of those
buildings.

DATES: The effective date of February 17, 2016 which has been
established for the FIRM and, where applicable, the supporting FIS
report showing the new or modified flood hazard information for each
community.

ADDRESSES: The FIRM, and if applicable, the FIS report containing the
final flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at the respective Community Map Repository address listed in
the tables below and will be available online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov by the effective date indicated
above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange

(FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) makes the final determinations listed below for the new or
modified flood hazard information for each community listed.
Notification of these changes has been published in newspapers of local
circulation and 90 days have elapsed since that publication. The Deputy
Associate Administrator for Mitigation has resolved any appeals
resulting from this notification.
    This final notice is issued in accordance with section 110 of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR part
67. FEMA has developed criteria for floodplain management in floodprone
areas in accordance with 44 CFR part 60.
    Interested lessees and owners of real property are encouraged to
review the new or revised FIRM and FIS report available at the address
cited below for each community or online through the FEMA Map Service
Center at www.msc.fema.gov.
    The flood hazard determinations are made final in the watersheds
and/or communities listed in the table below.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Date: November 18, 2015.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation, Department
of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
    I. Watershed-Based Studies:

                          Squaw Creek Watershed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Lake County, Illinois, and Incorporated Areas
                         Docket No.: FEMA-B-1404
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unincorporated Areas of Lake County....  Central Permit Facility, 500
                                          West Winchester Road, Unit
                                          101, Libertyville, IL 60048.
Village of Grayslake...................  Village Hall, 10 South Seymour
                                          Avenue, Grayslake, IL 60030.
Village of Hainesville.................  Village Hall, 100 North
                                          Hainesville Road, Hainesville,
                                          IL 60030.
Village of Hawthorn Woods..............  Village Hall, 2 Lagoon Drive,
                                          Hawthorn Woods, IL 60047.
Village of Mundelein...................  Village Hall, 300 Plaza Circle,
                                          Mundelein, IL 60060.
Village of Round Lake..................  Village Hall, 442 North Cedar
                                          Lake Road, Round Lake, IL
                                          60073.
Village of Round Lake Park.............  Village Hall, 203 East Lake
                                          Shore Drive, Round Lake Park,
                                          IL 60073.
Village of Volo........................  Village Hall, 500 South Fish
                                          Lake Road, Volo, IL 60073.
Village of Wauconda....................  Village Hall, 101 North Main
                                          Street, Wauconda, IL 60084.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    II. Non-Watershed-Based Studies:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Winnebago County, Illinois, and Incorporated Areas
                         Docket No.: FEMA-B-1452
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Loves Park.....................  Public Works Department, 100
                                          Heart Boulevard, Loves Park,
                                          IL 61111.
City of Rockford.......................  City Hall, 425 East State
                                          Street, Rockford, IL 61104.
City of South Beloit...................  City Hall, 519 Blackhawk
                                          Boulevard, South Beloit, IL
                                          61080.
Unincorporated Areas of Winnebago        County Courthouse, 404 Elm
 County.                                  Street, Rockford, IL 61101.
Village of Machesney Park..............  Planning & Zoning Department,
                                          300 Roosevelt Road, Machesney
                                          Park, IL 61115.
Village of Pecatonica..................  Village Hall, 405 Main Street,
                                          Pecatonica, IL 61063.
Village of Rockton.....................  Village Hall, 110 East Main
                                          Street, Rockton, IL 61072.
Village of Roscoe......................  Village Hall, 10631 Main
                                          Street, Roscoe, IL 61073.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Delaware County, Ohio, and Incorporated Areas
                         Docket No.: FEMA-B-1270
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Delaware.......................  City Building, 1 South Sandusky
                                          Street, 2nd Floor, Delaware,
                                          OH 43015.
Unincorporated Areas of Delaware County  Code Compliance Building, 50
                                          Channing Street, South Wing,
                                          Delaware, OH 43015.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Armstrong County, Pennsylvania (All Jurisdictions)
                         Docket No.: FEMA-B-1443
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Borough of Apollo......................  Borough Municipal Office, 616
                                          First Street, Apollo, PA
                                          15613.
Borough of Applewold...................  Applewold Borough Building, 8
                                          Hickory Street, Kittanning, PA
                                          16201.
Borough of Atwood......................  Atwood Borough Hall, 225 Atwood
                                          Sugar Run Road, Creekside, PA
                                          15732.
Borough of Dayton......................  Borough Office, 207 Mechanic
                                          Street, Dayton, PA 16222.
Borough of Ford City...................  Borough Municipal Building,
                                          1000 4th Avenue, Ford City, PA
                                          16226.
Borough of Freeport....................  Borough Municipal Office, 414
                                          Market Street, Freeport, PA
                                          16229.
Borough of Kittanning..................  Borough Building, 300 South
                                          McKean Street, Kittanning, PA
                                          16201
Borough of Leechburg...................  Borough Office, 260 Market
                                          Street, Leechburg, PA 15656.
Borough of Manorville..................  Borough Building, 600 Center
                                          Lane, Manorville, PA 16238.
Borough of North Apollo................  Borough Building, 1421 Leonard
                                          Avenue, North Apollo, PA
                                          15673.

Borough of Rural Valley................  Borough Building, 300 Parkwood
                                          Drive, Rural Valley, PA 16249.
Borough of South Bethlehem.............  South Bethlehem Borough
                                          Building, 217 West Broad
                                          Street, New Bethlehem, PA
                                          16242.
Borough of Worthington.................  Borough Municipal Building, 206
                                          Church Street, Worthington, PA
                                          16262.
City of Parker.........................  City Hall, 210 North Cooper
                                          Avenue, Parker, PA 16049.
Township of Bethel.....................  Bethel Township Hall, 3218
                                          Ridge Road, Ford City, PA
                                          16226.
Township of Boggs......................  Boggs Township Building, 292
                                          Mountain Trails Road,
                                          Templeton, PA 16259.
Township of Brady's Bend...............  Brady's Bend Township Municipal
                                          Building, 1004 State Route 68,
                                          East Brady, PA 16028.
Township of Burrell....................  Burrell Township Municipal
                                          Building, 110 Cochran's Mill
                                          Road, Ford City, PA 16226.
Township of Cadogan....................  Township Office, 333 1st
                                          Avenue, Cadogan, PA 16212.
Township of Cowanshannock..............  Cowanshannock Township
                                          Municipal Building, 4033
                                          Second Street, NuMine, PA
                                          16244.
Township of East Franklin..............  East Franklin Township
                                          Municipal Building, 106 Cherry
                                          Orchard Avenue, Kittanning, PA
                                          16201.
Township of Gilpin.....................  Gilpin Township Municipal
                                          Building, 589 State Route 66,
                                          Leechburg, PA 15656.
Township of Hovey......................  Hovey Township Building, 600
                                          North Riverview Drive, Parker,
                                          PA 16049.
Township of Kiskiminetas...............  Kiskiminetas Township Building,
                                          1222A Old State Road, Apollo,
                                          PA 15613.
Township of Kittanning.................  Township Municipal Building,
                                          395 Township Shed Road ,
                                          Kittanning, PA 16201
Township of Madison....................  Madison Township Building, 107
                                          Lawsonham Road, Templeton, PA
                                          16259.
Township of Mahoning...................  Mahoning Township Office, 2237
                                          Madison Road, Distant, PA
                                          16223.
Township of Manor......................  Manor Township Municipal
                                          Building, 306 Byron Street,
                                          McGrann, PA 16236.
Township of North Buffalo..............  North Buffalo Township
                                          Municipal Building, 149
                                          McHaddon Road, Kittanning, PA
                                          16201.
Township of Parks......................  Parks Township Community
                                          Building, 26 Jackson Street,
                                          North Vandergrift, PA 15690.
Township of Perry......................  Perry Township Building, 758
                                          Queenstown Road, Karns City,
                                          PA 16041.
Township of Pine.......................  Pine Township Building, 115
                                          Fifth Street, Templeton, PA
                                          16259.
Township of Plumcreek..................  Plumcreek Township Building,
                                          849 State Route 210, Shelocta,
                                          PA 15774.
Township of Rayburn....................  Rayburn Township Building, 105
                                          McGregor Road, Kittanning, PA
                                          16201.
Township of Redbank....................  Redbank Township Office, 135
                                          Sugar Valley Road, Mayport, PA
                                          16240.
Township of South Bend.................  South Bend Township Municipal
                                          Building, 219 Girty Road,
                                          Spring Church, PA 15686.
Township of South Buffalo..............  South Buffalo Township
                                          Municipal Building, 384 Iron
                                          Bridge Road, Freeport, PA
                                          16229.
Township of Sugarcreek.................  Sugarcreek Township Municipal
                                          Building, 1807 State Route
                                          268, East Brady, PA 16028.
Township of Valley.....................  Valley Township Municipal
                                          Building, 321 Harris Road,
                                          Kittanning, PA 16201.
Township of Washington.................  Washington Township Office, 357
                                          Adrian Sherrett Road, Adrian,
                                          PA 16210.
Township of Wayne......................  Wayne Township Building, 1381
                                          State Route 1018, Dayton, PA
                                          16222.
Township of West Franklin..............  West Franklin Township
                                          Municipal Building, 1473
                                          Butler Road, Worthington, PA
                                          16262.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Aransas County, Texas, and Incorporated Areas
                         Docket No.: FEMA-B-1443
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Aransas Pass...................  City Hall, 600 West Cleveland
                                          Boulevard, Aransas Pass, TX
                                          78336.
City of Port Aransas...................  City Hall, 710 West Avenue A,
                                          Port Aransas, TX 78373.
City of Rockport.......................  Public Works Service Center,
                                          2751 State Highway 35 Bypass,
                                          Rockport, TX 78382.
Town of Fulton.........................  Town Hall, 201 North 7th
                                          Street, Fulton, TX 78358.
Unincorporated Areas of Aransas County.  Aransas County Environmental
                                          Health Department, 870 Airport
                                          Road, Rockport, TX 78382.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2015-31011 Filed 12-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P