[Federal Register: May 24, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 100)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 29792-29805]
[DOCID:fr24my06-8]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0441; FRL-8174-5]
RIN 2060-AI66

National Emission Standards for the Printing and Publishing
Industry

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action on amendments to the
national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for
the printing and publishing industry which were promulgated on May 30,
1996, under the authority of section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
The direct final rule amendments amend specific provisions in the
Printing and Publishing Industry NESHAP to resolve issues and questions
raised after promulgation of the final rule and to correct errors in
the regulatory text. This action also makes direct final rule
amendments to the Paper and Other Web Coating NESHAP and the Printing,
Coating, and Dyeing of Fabric and Other Textiles NESHAP to clarify the
interaction between these rules and the Printing and Publishing
Industry NESHAP.

DATES: The direct final rule is effective on August 22, 2006 without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by June 23,
2006 or by July 10, 2006 if a public hearing is requested by June 5,
2006. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register indicating which amendments,
sections or paragraphs will become effective and which are being
withdrawn due to adverse comment. If anyone contacts EPA requesting to
speak at a public hearing, a public hearing will be held on June 8,
2006.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0441. All documents in the docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some

information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation Docket,

EPA West Building, Room B-102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the
Air and Radiation Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Hearing. If a public hearing is held, it will be held at 10
a.m. at the EPA's Environmental Research Center Auditorium, Research
Triangle Park, NC, or at an alternate site nearby.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information contact Mr.
David Salman, EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Sector
Policies and Programs Division, Coatings and Chemicals Group (D205-01),
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Regulated Entities. Categories and entities potentially regulated
by this action include:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Examples of
           Category                NAICS* code     potentially regulated
                                                         entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry......................            322212  Folding Paperboard Box
                                                   Manufacturing.
                                          322221  Coated and Laminated
                                                   Packaging Paper and
                                                   Plastics Film
                                                   Manufacturing.
                                          322222  Coated and Laminated
                                                   Paper Manufacturing.
                                          322223  Plastics, Foil, and
                                                   Coated Paper Bag
                                                   Manufacturing.
                                          322224  Uncoated Paper and
                                                   Multiwall Bag
                                                   Manufacturing.
                                          322225  Laminated Aluminum
                                                   Foil Manufacturing
                                                   for Flexible
                                                   Packaging.
                                          323111  Commercial Gravure
                                                   Printing.
                                          323112  Commercial
                                                   Flexographic
                                                   Printing.
                                          323119  Other Commercial
                                                   Printing.
                                          326192  Resilient Floor
                                                   Covering
                                                   Manufacturing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* North American Industry Classification System.

    This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this
action. To determine whether your facility is regulated by this action,
you should examine the applicability criteria of the rule. If you have
any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed in the preceding FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    Worldwide Web (WWW). In addition to being available in the docket,
an electronic copy of today's direct final NESHAP will also be
available on the WWW through the Technology Transfer Network (TTN).
Following the Administrator's signature, a copy of the NESHAP will be
posted on the TTN's policy and guidance page for newly proposed or
promulgated rules at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/. The TTN at EPA's

Web site provides information and technology exchange in various areas
of air pollution control.
    Comments. We are publishing the direct final rule amendments
without prior proposal because we view the amendments as
noncontroversial and do not anticipate adverse comments. However, in
the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register notice, we are
publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to amend
the Printing and Publishing Industry NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart
KK), the Paper and Other Web Coating NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart
JJJJ), and the Printing, Coating, and Dyeing of Fabric and Other
Textiles NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart OOOO) if adverse comments are
filed. Instructions for submitting comments are provided in that
document. If we receive any adverse comments on one or more distinct
amendments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public which provisions will become effective, and which
provisions are being withdrawn due to adverse comment. We will address
all public comments in a subsequent final rule, should the EPA
determine to issue one. Any of the distinct amendments in today's
direct final rule for which we do not receive adverse comment will
become effective on the previously mentioned date. We will not
institute a second comment period on the direct final rule amendments.
Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
    Judicial Review. Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, judicial
review of the direct final rule amendments is available only by filing
a petition for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit by July 24, 2006. Under section 307(d)(7)(B) of the
CAA, only an objection to the direct final rule amendments that was
raised with reasonable specificity during the period for public comment
can be raised during judicial review. Moreover, under section 307(b)(2)
of the CAA, the requirements established by the direct final rule
amendments may not be challenged separately in any civil or criminal
proceeding brought by EPA to enforce these requirements.
    Outline. The information presented in this preamble is organized as
follows:

I. Background
II. Amendments
    A. Applicability
    B. Designation of Affected Source
    C. Definitions
    D. Standards: Publication Rotogravure Printing
    E. Standards: Product and Packaging Rotogravure and Wide-Web
Flexographic Printing
    F. Performance Test Methods
    G. Monitoring Requirements
    H. Recordkeeping Requirements
    I. Reporting Requirements
    J. Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KK
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
    A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
    B. Paperwork Reduction Act
    C. Regulatory Flexibility
    D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
    E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
    F. Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
    G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
    H. Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
    I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
    J. Congressional Review Act.

I. Background

    On May 30 1996, we issued the final NESHAP for the printing and
publishing industry (61 FR 27140). The final NESHAP established
standards to control organic hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions
from new and existing publication rotogravure, product and packaging
rotogravure, and wide-web flexographic printing operations.
    Since promulgation of the rule, various issues and questions have
been raised by stakeholders and some errors have been identified in the
regulatory text. Today's action includes direct final rule amendments
that resolve inconsistencies, clarify language, and add additional
compliance flexibility. We are also making direct final rule amendments
to the Paper and Other Web Coating NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart
JJJJ), and the Printing, Coating, and Dyeing of Fabric and Other
Textiles NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart OOOO) to clarify the
interaction between these rules and the Printing and Publishing
Industry NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart KK). None of the amendments
will have any discernable effect on the stringency of the rules.

II. Amendments

    The discussion in this section of the preamble pertains to the
Printing and Publishing Industry NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart KK)
unless otherwise noted as applying to the Paper and Other Web Coating
NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart JJJJ) or the Printing, Coating, and
Dyeing of Fabric and Other Textiles NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart
OOOO).

A. Applicability

    The final rule contains a provision which some sources can use to
establish and maintain themselves as area sources of HAP with respect
to the Printing and Publishing Industry NESHAP. EPA has received many
questions about whether this provision in 40 CFR 63.820(a)(2) is an
optional or mandatory provision for sources that wish to establish and
maintain themselves as area sources. We have added language to 40 CFR
63.820(a)(2) to emphasize that this is an optional provision.
Facilities which establish and maintain themselves as area sources
through other mechanisms, as described in 40 CFR 63.820(a)(7), are not
subject to this subpart.

B. Designation of Affected Source

    In 40 CFR 63.821(a)(3), the final rule provides an option for
including ``stand-alone coating equipment'' in product and packaging
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing affected sources. We have
amended 40 CFR 63.821(a)(3) to now refer to ``stand-alone equipment''
rather than ``stand-alone coating equipment.'' This change provides the
owner or operator with more flexibility for bringing additional
equipment into the product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web
flexographic printing affected source. This may simplify the compliance
demonstration for some affected sources because they will not need to
separately quantify the materials used on stand-alone equipment in
order to exclude them from the compliance demonstration as is necessary
when stand-alone equipment is not part of the product and packaging
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing affected source. This may
also simplify the compliance demonstration for affected sources which
vent emissions from product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web
flexographic presses and from stand-alone equipment to a common control
device.
    Consistent with this change, we have also amended 40 CFR 63.3300(a)
of the Paper and Other Web Coating NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart
JJJJ) to now refer to ``stand-alone equipment'' rather than ``stand-
alone coating equipment.''
    In response to several requests we have added options in 40 CFR
63.821(a)(4) for including narrow-web flexographic presses and in 40
CFR 63.821(a)(5) for including proof presses in product and packaging
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing affected sources. These
options may simplify the compliance demonstration for some affected
sources because they will not need to separately quantify the materials
used on narrow-web flexographic presses or proof presses in order to
exclude them from the compliance demonstration as is necessary when
narrow-web flexographic presses and proof presses are not part of the
product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing
affected source.
    We have corrected 40 CFR 63.821(a)(2)(ii)(A) to state that the
total mass of materials applied by the press using product and
packaging rotogravure ``print'' stations be included in the numerator.
The final rule incorrectly referred to product and packaging
rotogravure ``work'' stations in the numerator.
    We have added a new 40 CFR 63.821(a)(6) to clarify that certain
operations affiliated with product and packaging rotogravure or wide-
web flexographic printing affected sources are part of the printing and
publishing industry source category, but are not part of the product
and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing affected
source. These affiliated operations include mixing or dissolving of ink
or coating ingredients prior to application; ink or coating mixing for
viscosity adjustment, color tint or additive blending, or pH
adjustment; cleaning of ink or coating lines and line parts; handling
and storage of inks, coatings and solvents; and conveyance and
treatment of wastewater. Including these affiliated operations in the
printing and publishing source category is consistent with 40 CFR
63.7985(d)(2) of the Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing NESHAP (40 CFR
part 63, subpart HHHHH) which exempts these affiliated operations from
coverage under that rule. They were excluded from the product and
packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing affected source
in the final rule because they were not within the scope of the data
collected and used to establish the floor and the maximum achievable
control technology (MACT) standard for these affected sources.
    These affiliated operations continue to be part of publication
rotogravure affected sources as described in 40 CFR 63.821(a)(1). The
material balance records kept for the solvent recovery systems used by
all publication rotogravure facilities were broader in scope and
included these affiliated operations. As a result, they form part of
the basis for the floor and the MACT standard for publication
rotogravure affected sources.
    We have added a new 40 CFR 63.821(a)(7) to clarify that certain
lithographic presses, letterpress presses, or screen printing presses,
referred to in this new paragraph as ``other presses,'' are part of the
printing and publishing industry source category, but are not part of
the publication rotogravure affected source or the product and
packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing affected source
unless the owner or operator chooses to include them in the affected
source as stand-alone equipment as provided in 40 CFR 63.821(a)(3). A
definition of the term ``other presses'' has been added to the rule.
    Rotogravure, flexography, lithography, letterpress, and screen
printing were all part of the printing and publishing source category
in the ``Initial List of Categories of Sources Under Section 112(c)(1)
of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990'' published on July 16, 1992
(57 FR 31576). The source category was described in detail in
``Documentation for Developing the Initial Source Category List'' (EPA-
450/3-91-030, July 1992). The publication rotogravure affected source
in the final rule addresses the publication rotogravure printing
process. The product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic
printing affected source in the final rule addresses the product and
packaging rotogravure and wide-web flexographic printing processes.
Lithography, letterpress, and screen printing are different printing
processes than publication rotogravure, product and packaging
rotogravure, and flexographic printing. Lithographic, letterpress, and
screen printing presses that did not also meet the definition of
rotogravure press or wide-web flexographic press (i.e., that had no
rotogravure print stations and no wide-web flexographic print
stations), therefore, were not part of the publication rotogravure
affected source, or the product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web
flexographic printing affected source in the final rule.
    We have added a new 40 CFR 63.821(a)(8) to clarify that narrow-web
flexographic presses are part of the printing and publishing industry
source category, but are not part of the publication rotogravure
affected source or the product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web
flexographic printing affected source unless the owner or operator
chooses to include them in the product and packaging rotogravure or
wide-web flexographic printing affected source as provided in 40 CFR
63.821(a)(3) through (5). The rule did not previously treat narrow-web
flexographic presses as part of either of these affected sources. We
are providing the option of including them in the product and packaging
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing affected source because
this may simplify the compliance

demonstration for some affected sources that previously had to
separately quantify the materials used on these presses in order to
exclude them from the compliance demonstration.
    We have added the word ``affected'' to 40 CFR 63.821(b)(1) and (2)
to clarify that these paragraphs apply to ``affected sources.''

C. Definitions

    We have added, removed, and revised a number of definitions in the
rule. These changes add clarity and consistency to the rule.
    We added a definition of ``coating'' to clarify that in addition to
solvent-borne coatings and waterborne coatings, materials with 100
percent or near 100 percent solids such as wax coatings, wax
laminations, extrusion coatings, ultra-violet cured coatings, etc., are
coatings. Materials used to form unsupported substrates such as
calendaring of vinyl, blown film, cast film, etc., are not coatings.
    We added a definition of ``flexible packaging.'' This term is used
in the revised definition of ``printing operation.''
    We added a definition of ``narrow-web flexographic press'' to
complement the already existing definition of ``wide-web flexographic
press.''
    We added a definition of ``other press'' to complement the use of
that term in 40 CFR 63.821(a)(7).
    We added a definition of ``publication rotogravure press'' to
complement the definition of ``rotogravure press.'' This definition
clarifies that a publication rotogravure press may include one or more
flexographic imprinters and that a publication rotogravure press with
one or more flexographic imprinters is not a flexographic press.
    We added a definition of ``stand-alone equipment'' and removed the
definition of ``stand-alone coating equipment.'' This change provides
the owner or operator with additional flexibility for bringing
additional equipment into the product and packaging rotogravure or
wide-web flexographic printing affected source. We also removed the
definitions of ``coating operation'' and ``coating station.'' Since
these two terms were used only in the definition of stand-alone coating
equipment and they are not used in the definition of stand-alone
equipment, these two definitions are no longer needed.
    We revised the definition of ``certified product data sheet''
(CPDS) to refer to 40 CFR 63.827(b) rather than to Method 311 or 40 CFR
63.827(b) since Method 311 is discussed in 40 CFR 63.827(b). We
included volatile matter weight fraction along with solids weight
fraction in the reference to 40 CFR 63.827(c) since both of these
attributes are addressed in 40 CFR 63.827(c). We also explained how a
material safety data sheet may serve as a CPDS.
    We revised the definition of ``control device efficiency'' to refer
to organic HAP emissions rather than to HAP emissions. The word
``organic'' was inadvertently omitted from the original definition.
    We revised the definitions of ``flexographic press'' and
``rotogravure press'' to clarify that the unwind or feed section may
contain more than one unwind or feed station. For example, a press that
prints on paper and then laminates plastic film to the paper will have
an unwind or feed station for the paper, and an unwind or feed station
for the plastic that is being laminated to the paper. Both are included
in the unwind or feed section.
    We revised the definition of ``flexographic print station'' to
clarify the meaning of the term and to distinguish it from certain
operations which take place on ``other presses.''
    We revised the definition of ``printing operation'' to include
fabric or other textiles for use in flexible packaging, and to exclude
wood furniture components and wood building products. Fabric is printed
by roller (intaglio), rotary screen, ink jet, and other printing
techniques. Rotogravure and flexographic printing are not traditional
fabric printing techniques because the materials used are too fluid.
Today, there is some rotogravure or flexographic printing of non-woven
substrates, which may meet the definition of ``fabric'' or ``textile''
in the Printing, Coating, and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles
NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart OOOO). This includes rotogravure or
flexographic printing of fabric or other textiles for use in flexible
packaging which is most appropriately covered by the Printing and
Publishing Industry NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart KK). Therefore, we
are including rotogravure or flexographic printing of fabric or other
textiles for use in flexible packaging in the definition of ``printing
operation'' in the Printing and Publishing Industry NESHAP.
    Consistent with this change, we have also amended 40 CFR 63.4281 of
the Printing, Coating, and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles NESHAP
(40 CFR part 63, subpart OOOO) by adding a new paragraph (d)(4) which
states that equipment used to coat or print on fabric or other textiles
for use in flexible packaging that is included in an affected source
under the Printing and Publishing Industry NESHAP (40 CFR part 63,
subpart KK) is not part of an affected source under the Printing,
Coating, and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles NESHAP.
    There is some rotogravure printing of wood furniture components and
wood building products. These wood printing operations are covered by
the Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations NESHAP (40 CFR part 63,
subpart JJ) or the Surface Coating of Wood Building Products NESHAP (40
CFR part 63, subpart QQQQ). Therefore, we are excluding them from the
definition of ``printing operation'' in the Printing and Publishing
Industry NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart KK).
    We revised the definition of ``proof press'' by broadening it to
include checking the quality of substrates, inks, or other solids-
containing materials. Proof presses sometimes serve these other
purposes, for example, at a paper mill or ink manufacturing facility.
    We corrected the definition of ``rotogravure print station'' to use
the term ``print station'' rather than the term ``work station'' in the
body of the definition and revised this definition to clarify that
other types of materials that may not be referred to by the supplier or
by the user as inks can be applied by rotogravure print stations. The
term ``ink'' in the definition in the final rule was intended to
include any solids containing material since materials that might be
characterized by the supplier or by the user as inks, coatings, or
adhesives are applied on rotogravure print stations.
    We revised the definition of ``work station'' to clarify that work
stations are present on equipment other than rotogravure or wide-web
flexographic presses. For example, work stations are present on proof
presses and stand-alone equipment.
    The symbol H was used in two different ways in the final rule. To
resolve this inconsistency, we revised the definition of the symbol H
and changed the symbol used in equation 8 from H to Happ.
The symbol H is now defined to mean the monthly organic HAP emitted in
kilograms. The symbol Happ is defined to mean the total
monthly organic HAP applied in kilograms. Since the symbol
Happ is only used in equation 8, we have placed the
definition of Happ immediately after that equation.
    The symbols Ci and MWi were used only in
equation 20 in the final rule. The definitions of these symbols were
inconsistent with the manner in which the results of Methods 25 and 25A
are expressed. The definitions referred to individual organic
compounds. The results of Methods 25 and 25A, however, are expressed as
carbon. We

have added a new symbol Cc for use in equation 20. The
definition of Cc is consistent with the manner in which the
results of Methods 25 and 25A are expressed. Since Cc is
used only in equation 20, we have placed the definition of
Cc immediately after that equation. The symbols
MWi and Ci are not needed and have been removed.
The symbols Mf and Qsd are used only in equation
20. We have moved the definitions of these symbols to immediately after
that equation.

D. Standards: Publication Rotogravure Printing

    We revised 40 CFR 63.824(b)(1)(i)(A) and (b)(3)(i) by inserting a
comma between ``varnish'' and ``adhesive'' to clarify that these are
two different types of materials.
    We revised 40 CFR 63.824(b)(1)(ii)(A) and (b)(2)(ii) to clarify the
continuous emission monitoring requirements for solvent recovery
devices and oxidizers. For solvent recovery devices, a single
continuous volumetric gas flow measurement should be sufficient since
the inlet and outlet volumetric gas flow rates for a solvent recovery
device are essentially equal. For oxidizers, separate continuous
volumetric gas flow measurements of the inlet and outlet volumetric gas
flow rates are required.

E. Standards: Product and Packaging Rotogravure and Wide-Web
Flexographic Printing

    We corrected the first sentence of 40 CFR 63.825(b) introductory
text to refer to ``organic HAP emissions'' rather than to
``emissions.''
    We revised 40 CFR 63.825(b)(6) to use the symbol Happ
instead of H because the symbol H is used with a different meaning
elsewhere in the final rule. We defined Happ in 40 CFR
63.825(b)(6) in the same way in which H was previously used in this
paragraph of the final rule.
    We revised 40 CFR 63.825(c)(2)(iii) and (d)(2) to clarify the
continuous emission monitoring requirements for solvent recovery
devices and oxidizers. For solvent recovery devices, a single
continuous volumetric gas flow measurement should be sufficient since
the inlet and outlet volumetric gas flow rates for a solvent recovery
device are essentially equal. For oxidizers, separate continuous
volumetric gas flow measurements of the inlet and outlet volumetric gas
flow rates are required.
    We revised 40 CFR 63.825(d)(1)(iv) to refer to a common oxidizer
rather than a common solvent recovery system because 40 CFR 63.825(d)
describes compliance demonstration requirements for oxidizers.

F. Performance Test Methods

    We revised 40 CFR 63.827(a)(1)(i) and (ii) to clarify that there
must be continuous emission monitors for both total organic volatile
matter concentration and volumetric gas flow rate, and that the
continuous emission monitoring must be done in accordance with the
requirements of this subpart. Both concentration and flow data are
needed to calculate the total organic volatile matter mass flow.
    In 40 CFR 63.827(b) of the final rule, the provisions for using
manufacturers formulation data for determining organic HAP content
required the inclusion of all HAP present at a level greater than 0.1
weight percent in any raw material used. This requirement was based on
indications from ink and coating manufacturers that they were already
receiving this level of information from their raw material suppliers.
A trade association representing certain raw material suppliers
submitted information showing that ink and coating manufacturers are
not receiving this level of information from their suppliers. Rather,
they are receiving information consistent with the requirements of the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) hazard
communication standards which require the identification of hazardous
constituents present at greater than or equal to 0.1 weight percent for
OSHA-defined carcinogens as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(d)(4) and
greater than or equal to 1.0 weight percent for other hazardous
constituents. We revised 40 CFR 63.827(b) to make it consistent with
the OSHA hazard communication standards, included some examples, and
clarified that test data and formulation data can be provided by
suppliers or independent third parties.
    We revised 40 CFR 63.827(c) by including some examples, specifying
how to calculate weight solids fraction from volatile matter weight
fraction, and clarifying that test data and formulation data can be
provided by suppliers or independent third parties.
    We revised 40 CFR 63.827(d)(1)(vi) to clarify that the same method
must be used to determine inlet and outlet organic volatile matter
concentration, and that the 50 parts per million by volume levels for
Method 25A are expressed on an as carbon basis.
    We revised 40 CFR 63.827(d)(1)(viii) to clarify that the results of
Methods 25 and 25A are expressed on an as carbon basis and to define
the symbols used in equation 20 immediately after that equation.
    In 40 CFR 63.827(e)(1) and (2) the final rule referred to the
capture efficiency procedures in appendix B to 40 CFR 52.741 and 40 CFR
52.741(a)(4)(iii)(B). We revised 40 CFR 63.827(e)(1) and (2) to refer
to Methods 204 and 204A through F of 40 CFR part 51, appendix M. These
methods did not exist when the final rule was published on May 30,
1996. They are updated versions of the procedures specified in the
final rule.

G. Monitoring Requirements

    We revised 40 CFR 63.828(a)(3) to clarify that there must be
continuous emission monitors for both total organic volatile matter
concentration and volumetric gas flow rate. Both concentration and flow
data are needed to calculate the total organic volatile matter mass
flow.

H. Recordkeeping Requirements

    We corrected 40 CFR 63.829(e)(1) and (2) to state that records must
be kept of the total mass, as opposed to volume, of each material
applied on product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic
printing presses during each month. This is consistent with 40 CFR
63.821(b)(2) and 40 CFR 63.827(b)(2) which require these measurements
to be done on a mass basis.

I. Reporting Requirements

    We revised 40 CFR 63.830(b)(6) to clarify that summary reports are
required even if the affected source does not have any control devices
or does not take the performance of any control devices into account in
demonstrating compliance with the emission limitations in 40 CFR 63.824
or 40 CFR 63.825. As stated in 40 CFR 63.830(b)(6)(i) through (iv),
these summary reports must include information about various types of
exceedances. These types of exceedances can occur at sources with or
without control devices.

J. Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KK

    We revised appendix A to subpart KK to make several clarifications.
In paragraph 3.2 of appendix A we have clarified that the confidence
intervals are two-sided, changed the designation of the table to Table
A-1, changed the table references to Table A-1, and corrected the table
entry for 11 valid test runs. In paragraph 4.8 of appendix A we have
changed the table reference to Table A-1.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), EPA
must determine whether this regulatory action is ``significant'' and,
therefore, subject to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and
the requirements of the Executive Order. The Executive Order defines
``significant regulatory action'' as one that is likely to result in a
rule that may:
    (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities;
    (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
    (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or
    (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
the Executive Order.
    It has been determined that this rule is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under the terms of Executive Order 12866 and is,
therefore, not subject to OMB review.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This action does not impose any new information collection burden.
This action adds clarifications and corrections to the final standards.
However, OMB has previously approved the information collection
requirements contained in the existing regulations (69 FR 3912, January
27, 2004) under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C. 3501, et seq., and has assigned OMB control number 2060-0335
(EPA ICR No. 1739.04). A copy of the Information Collection Request
(ICR) may be obtained from Ms. Susan Auby by mail at the Office of
Environmental Information, Collection Strategies Division (2822), EPA,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, by e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. You also may download

a copy from the internet at http://www.epa.gov/icr. Include the ICR

number in any correspondence.
    Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    EPA has determined that it is not necessary to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis in connection with the direct final rule
amendments.
    For purposes of assessing the impacts of today's direct final rule
on small entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business
ranging from 500 to 1,000 as defined by the Small Business
Administration's regulations at 13 CFR 121.201; (2) a small
governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town,
school district or special district with a population of less than
50,000; and (3) a small organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.
    After considering the economic impact of today's direct final rule
amendments on small entities, EPA has concluded that this action will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. We conducted an assessment of the impact of the May 30, 1996
final rule on small businesses within the industries affected by that
rule. This analysis allowed us to conclude that there would not be a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
from the implementation of that rule. There is nothing contained in the
direct final rule amendments that will impose an economic impact on
small businesses in any way not considered in the analysis of the May
30, 1996 final rule; this means that the direct final rule amendments
have no incremental economic impact on small businesses beyond what was
already examined in the final rule.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, EPA
generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that
may result in expenditures to State, local, and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any
1 year. Before promulgating a rule for which a written statement is
needed, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires us to identify and
consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt the
least costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative that
achieves the objectives of the rule. The provisions of section 205 do
not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law. Moreover,
section 205 allows us to adopt an alternative other than the least
costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative if the
Administrator publishes with the final rule an explanation why that
alternative was not adopted. Before EPA establishes any regulatory
requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, including tribal governments, it must have developed under
section 203 of the UMRA a small government agency plan. The plan must
provide for notifying potentially affected small governments, enabling
officials of affected small governments to have meaningful and timely
input in the development of EPA regulatory proposals with significant
Federal intergovernmental mandates, and informing, educating, and
advising small governments on compliance with the regulatory
requirements.
    EPA has determined that the direct final rule amendments do not
contain a Federal mandate that may result in expenditures of $100
million or more for State, local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or the private sector in any 1 year. The direct final rule
amendments apply to affected sources in the printing and publishing
industry and clarify and correct errors in the final rule and,
therefore, add no additional burden on sources. Thus, the direct final
rule amendments are not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and
205 of the UMRA.

E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism

    Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August
10,

1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
    The direct final rule amendments do not have federalism
implications. They will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132. No
printing and publishing facilities subject to the direct final rule
amendments are owned by State or local governments. Therefore, State
and local governments will not have any direct compliance costs
resulting from the direct final rule amendments. Furthermore, the
direct final rule amendments do not require these governments to take
on any new responsibilities. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply
to the direct final rule amendments.

F. Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' The direct final rule
amendments do not have tribal implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. They will not have substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship between the Federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal government and Indian tribes, because we are not
aware of any Indian tribal governments or communities affected by the
direct final rule amendments. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to the direct final rule amendments.
    EPA specifically solicits additional comment on the direct final
rule amendments from tribal officials.

G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) applies to any
rule that: (1) Is determined to be ``economically significant'' as
defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental
health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a
disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action meets
both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health or
safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the
planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and
reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.
    EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that are based on health or safety risks, such that
the analysis required under section 5-501 of the Executive Order has
the potential to influence the regulation. The direct final rule
amendments are not subject to Executive Order 13045 because they are
based on technology performance and not on health or safety risks.

H. Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    The direct final rule amendments are not subject to Executive Order
13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because they are not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) of 1995, Public Law 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS) in its
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. VCS are technical standards
(e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and
business practices) that are developed or adopted by VCS bodies. The
NTTAA directs EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when
the Agency decides not to use available and applicable VCS.
    These amendments add references to EPA Methods 204 and 204A through
F of 40 CFR part 51, appendix M for determining capture efficiency.
These methods replace the capture efficiency procedures of appendix B
to 40 CFR 52.741 and 40 CFR 52.741(a)(4)(iii)(B). EPA Methods 204 and
204A through F are updated versions of the previously used procedures.
    Consistent with the NTTAA, EPA conducted searches to identify VCS
in addition to these EPA methods. No applicable VCS were identified for
EPA Methods 204 and 204A-F. The search and review results have been
documented and are placed in the docket for the amendments.
    EPA test methods included in the rule are specified in 40 CFR
63.827. Under 40 CFR 63.7(f) and 40 CFR 63.8(f) of subpart A of the
General Provisions, a source may apply to EPA for permission to use
alternative test methods or alternative monitoring requirements in
place of any of the EPA testing methods, performance specifications, or
procedures.

J. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing the
direct final rule amendments and other required information to the
United States Senate, the United States House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the direct final rule amendments in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. The direct final rule amendments are not a ``major rule'' as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The direct final rule amendments will be
effective on August 22, 2006.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, and Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: May 18, 2006.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.

0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, Title 40, chapter I, part 63
of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 63--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

Subpart KK--[Amended]

0
2. Section 63.820 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(2) introductory
text to read as follows:

Sec.  63.820  Applicability.

    (a) * * *
    (2) Each new and existing facility at which publication
rotogravure, product and packaging rotogravure, or wide-web
flexographic printing presses are operated for which the owner or
operator chooses to commit to and meets the criteria of paragraphs
(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section for purposes of establishing the
facility to be an area source of HAP with respect to this subpart. A
facility which establishes area source status through some other
mechanism, as described in paragraph (a)(7) of this section, is not
subject to the provisions of this subpart.
* * * * *

0
3. Section 63.821 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2) introductory text, (a)(2)(i),
(a)(2)(ii)(A), and (a)(3).
0
b. Adding paragraphs (a)(4) through (a)(8).
0
c. Revising paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.821  Designation of Affected Sources.

    (a) * * *
    (1) All of the publication rotogravure presses and all related
equipment, including proof presses, cylinder and parts cleaners, ink
and solvent mixing and storage equipment, and solvent recovery
equipment at a facility.
    (2) All of the product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web
flexographic printing presses at a facility plus any other equipment at
that facility which the owner or operator chooses to include in
accordance with paragraphs (a)(3) or (a)(4) of this section, except
    (i) Proof presses, unless the owner or operator chooses to include
proof presses in the affected source in accordance with paragraph
(a)(5) of this section.
    (ii) * * *
    (A) the sum of the total mass of inks, coatings, varnishes,
adhesives, primers, solvents, thinners, reducers, and other materials
applied by the press using product and packaging rotogravure print
stations and the total mass of inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives,
primers, solvents, thinners, reducers, and other materials applied by
the press using wide-web flexographic print stations in each month
never exceeds 5 percent of the total mass of inks, coatings, varnishes,
adhesives, primers, solvents, thinners, reducers, and other materials
applied by the press in that month, including all inboard and outboard
stations; and
* * * * *
    (3) The owner or operator of an affected source, as defined in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, may elect to include in that affected
source stand-alone equipment subject to the following provisions:
    (i) Stand-alone equipment meeting any of the criteria specified in
this subparagraph is eligible for inclusion:
    (A) The stand-alone equipment and one or more product and packaging
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses are used to apply solids-
containing materials to the same web or substrate; or
    (B) The stand-alone equipment and one or more product and packaging
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses apply a common solids-
containing material; or
    (C) A common control device is used to control organic HAP
emissions from the stand-alone equipment and from one or more product
and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing presses;
    (ii) All eligible stand-alone equipment located at the facility is
included in the affected source; and
    (iii) No product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic
presses are excluded from the affected source under the provisions of
paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section.
    (4) The owner or operator of an affected source, as defined in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, may elect to include in that affected
source narrow-web flexographic presses subject to the following
provisions:
    (i) Each narrow-web flexographic press meeting any of the criteria
specified in this subparagraph is eligible for inclusion:
    (A) The narrow-web flexographic press and one or more product and
packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses are used to
apply solids containing material to the same web or substrate; or
    (B) The narrow-web flexographic press and one or more product and
packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses apply a common
solids-containing material; or
    (C) A common control device is used to control organic HAP
emissions from the narrow-web flexographic press and from one or more
product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses; and
    (ii) All eligible narrow-web flexographic presses located at the
facility are included in the affected source.
    (5) The owner or operator of an affected source, as defined in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, may elect to include in that affected
source rotogravure proof presses or flexographic proof presses subject
to the following provisions:
    (i) Each proof press meeting any of the criteria specified in this
subparagraph is eligible for inclusion.
    (A) The proof press and one or more product and packaging
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses apply a common solids-
containing material; or
    (B) A common control device is used to control organic HAP
emissions from the proof press and from one or more product and
packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses; and
    (ii) All eligible proof presses located at the facility are
included in the affected source.
    (6) Affiliated operations such as mixing or dissolving of ink or
coating ingredients prior to application; ink or coating mixing for
viscosity adjustment, color tint or additive blending, or pH
adjustment; cleaning of ink or coating lines and line parts; handling
and storage of inks, coatings, and solvents; and conveyance and
treatment of wastewater are part of the printing and publishing
industry source category, but are not part of the product and packaging
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing affected source.
    (7) Other presses are part of the printing and publishing industry
source category, but are not part of the publication rotogravure
affected source or the product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web
flexographic printing affected source and are, therefore, exempt from
the requirements of this subpart except as provided in paragraph (a)(3)
of this section.
    (8) Narrow web-flexographic presses are part of the printing and
publishing industry source category, but are not part of the
publication rotogravure affected source or the product and packaging
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing affected source and are,
therefore, exempt from the requirements of this subpart except as
provided in paragraphs (a)(3) through (5) of this section.
    (b) * * *
    (1) The owner or operator of the affected source applies no more
than 500 kilograms (kg) per month, for every month, of inks, coatings,
varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents, thinners, reducers, and other
materials on product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic
printing presses, or
    (2) The owner or operator of the affected source applies no more
than

400 kg per month, for every month, of organic HAP on product and
packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing presses.
* * * * *

0
4. Section 63.822 is amended by:
0
a. Adding in alphabetical order in paragraph (a) definitions for
``coating,'' ``flexible packaging,'' ``narrow-web flexographic press,''
``other press,'' ``publication rotogravure press,'' and ``stand-alone
equipment.''
0
b. Removing the definitions of ``coating operation,'' ``coating
station,'' and ``stand-alone coating equipment'' from paragraph (a).
0
c. Revising the definitions in paragraph (a) of ``certified product
data sheet (CPDS),'' ``control device efficiency,'' ``flexographic
press,'' ``flexographic print station,'' ``printing operation,''
``proof press,'' ``rotogravure press,'' ``rotogravure print station,''
and ``work station.''
0
d. Revising paragraph (b)(12).
0
e. Removing and reserving paragraphs (b)(6), (b)(22), (b)(32), and
(b)(36) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.822  Definitions.

    (a) * * *
* * * * *
    Certified product data sheet (CPDS) means documentation furnished
by suppliers of inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers,
solvents, and other materials or by an independent third party that
provides the organic HAP weight fraction of these materials determined
in accordance with Sec.  63.827(b), or the volatile matter weight
fraction or solids weight fraction determined in accordance with Sec.
63.827(c). A material safety data sheet (MSDS) may serve as a CPDS
provided the MSDS meets the data requirements of Sec.  63.827(b) and
(c). The purpose of the CPDS is to assist the owner or operator in
demonstrating compliance with the emission limitations presented in
Sec. Sec.  63.824-63.825.
    Coating means material applied onto or impregnated into a substrate
for decorative, protective, or functional purposes. Such materials
include, but are not limited to, solvent-borne coatings, waterborne
coatings, wax coatings, wax laminations, extrusion coatings, extrusion
laminations, 100 percent solid adhesives, ultra-violet cured coatings,
electron beam cured coatings, hot melt coatings, and cold seal
coatings. Materials used to form unsupported substrates such as
calendaring of vinyl, blown film, cast film, extruded film, and
coextruded film are not considered coatings.
* * * * *
    Control device efficiency means the ratio of organic HAP emissions
recovered or destroyed by a control device to the total organic HAP
emissions that are introduced into the control device, expressed as a
percentage.
* * * * *
    Flexible packaging means any package or part of a package the shape
of which can be readily changed. Flexible packaging includes, but is
not limited to, bags, pouches, labels, liners and wraps utilizing
paper, plastic, film, aluminum foil, metalized or coated paper or film,
or any combination of these materials.
    Flexographic press means an unwind or feed section, which may
include more than one unwind or feed station (such as on a laminator),
a series of individual work stations, one or more of which is a
flexographic print station, any dryers (including interstage dryers and
overhead tunnel dryers) associated with the work stations, and a
rewind, stack, or collection section. The work stations may be oriented
vertically, horizontally, or around the circumference of a single large
impression cylinder. Inboard and outboard work stations, including
those employing any other technology, such as rotogravure, are included
if they are capable of printing or coating on the same substrate. A
publication rotogravure press with one or more flexographic imprinters
is not a flexographic press.
    Flexographic print station means a print station on which a
flexographic printing operation is conducted. A flexographic print
station includes an anilox roller that transfers material to a raised
image (type or art) on a plate cylinder. The material is then
transferred from the image on the plate cylinder to the web or sheet to
be printed. A flexographic print station may include a fountain roller
to transfer material from the reservoir to the anilox roller, or
material may be transferred directly from the reservoir to the anilox
roller. The materials applied are of a fluid, rather than paste,
consistency.
* * * * *
    Narrow-web flexographic press means a flexographic press that is
not capable of printing substrates greater than 18 inches in width and
that does not also meet the definition of rotogravure press (i.e., it
has no rotogravure print stations).
* * * * *
    Other press means a lithographic press, letterpress press, or
screen printing press that does not meet the definition of rotogravure
press or flexographic press (i.e., it has no rotogravure print stations
and no flexographic print stations), and that does not print on fabric
or other textiles as defined in the Printing, Coating, and Dyeing of
Fabrics and Other Textiles NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart OOOO), wood
furniture components as defined in the Wood Furniture Manufacturing
Operations NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart JJ) or wood building
products as defined in the Surface Coating of Wood Building Products
NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart QQQQ).
* * * * *
    Printing operation means the formation of words, designs, or
pictures on a substrate other than wood furniture components as defined
in the Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations NESHAP (40 CFR part 63,
subpart JJ), wood building products as defined in the Surface Coating
of Wood Building Products NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart QQQQ), and
fabric or other textiles as defined in the Printing, Coating, and
Dyeing of Fabric and Other Textiles NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart
OOOO), except for fabric or other textiles for use in flexible
packaging.
* * * * *
    Proof press means any press which prints only non-saleable items
used to check the quality of image formation of rotogravure cylinders
or flexographic plates; substrates such as paper, plastic film, metal
foil, or vinyl; or ink, coating varnish, adhesive, primer, or other
solids-containing material.
* * * * *
    Publication rotogravure press means a rotogravure press used for
publication rotogravure printing. A publication rotogravure press may
include one or more flexographic imprinters. A publication rotogravure
press with one or more flexographic imprinters is not a flexographic
press.
* * * * *
    Rotogravure press means an unwind or feed section, which may
include more than one unwind or feed station (such as on a laminator),
a series of individual work stations, one or more of which is a
rotogravure print station, any dryers associated with the work
stations, and a rewind, stack, or collection section. Inboard and
outboard work stations, including those employing any other technology,
such as flexography, are included if they are capable of printing or
coating on the same substrate.
    Rotogravure print station means a print station on which a
rotogravure printing operation is conducted. A

rotogravure print station includes a rotogravure cylinder and supply
for ink or other solids containing material. The image (type and art)
to be printed is etched or engraved below the surface of the
rotogravure cylinder. On a rotogravure cylinder the printing image
consists of millions of minute cells.
* * * * *
    Stand-alone equipment means an unwind or feed section, which may
include more than one unwind or feed station (such as on a laminator);
a series of one or more work stations and any associated dryers; and a
rewind, stack, or collection section that is not part of a product and
packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic press. Stand-alone
equipment is sometimes referred to as ``off-line'' equipment.
* * * * *
    Work station means a unit on which material is deposited onto a
substrate.
    (b) * * *
    (6) [Reserved]
* * * * *
    (12) H = the monthly organic HAP emitted, kg.
* * * * *
    (22) [Reserved]
* * * * *
    (32) [Reserved]
* * * * *
    (36) [Reserved]
* * * * *

0
5. Section 63.824 is amended by revising paragraphs (b)(1)(i)(A),
(b)(1)(ii)(A), (b)(2)(ii), and (b)(3)(i) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.824  Standards: Publication rotogravure printing.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) Measure the mass of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive,
primer, solvent, and other material used by the affected source during
the month.
* * * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (A) Install continuous emission monitors to collect the data
necessary to calculate the total organic volatile matter mass flow in
the gas stream entering and the total organic volatile matter mass flow
in the gas stream exiting the solvent recovery device for each month
such that the percent control efficiency (E) of the solvent recovery
device can be calculated for the month. This requires continuous
emission monitoring of the total organic volatile matter concentration
in the gas stream entering the solvent recovery device, the total
organic volatile matter concentration in the gas stream exiting the
solvent recovery device, and the volumetric gas flow rate through the
solvent recovery device. A single continuous volumetric gas flow
measurement should be sufficient for a solvent recovery device since
the inlet and outlet volumetric gas flow rates for a solvent recovery
device are essentially equal. Each month's individual inlet
concentration values and corresponding individual gas flow rate values
are multiplied and then summed to get the total organic volatile matter
mass flow in the gas stream entering the solvent recovery device for
the month. Each month's individual outlet concentration values and
corresponding individual gas flow rate values are multiplied and then
summed to get the total organic volatile matter mass flow in the gas
stream exiting the solvent recovery device for the month.
* * * * *
    (2) * * *
    (ii) Use continuous emission monitors, conduct an initial
performance test of capture efficiency, and continuously monitor a site
specific operating parameter to assure capture efficiency. The percent
control efficiency of the oxidizer shall be demonstrated in accordance
with the requirements of paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section except
that separate continuous measurements of the inlet volumetric gas flow
rate and the outlet volumetric gas flow rate are required for an
oxidizer.
    (3) * * *
    (i) Measure the mass of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive,
primer, solvent, and other material used in the affected source during
the month.
* * * * *

0
6. Section 63.825 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the first sentence of paragraph (b) introductory text.
0
b. Revising paragraph (b)(6).
0
c. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(iii).
0
d. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(iv).
0
e. Revising paragraph (d)(2) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.825  Standards: Product and packaging rotogravure and wide-web
flexographic printing.

* * * * *
    (b) Each product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic
printing affected source shall limit organic HAP emissions to no more
than 5 percent of the organic HAP applied for the month; or to no more
than 4 percent of the mass of inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives,
primers, solvents, reducers, thinners, and other materials applied for
the month; or to no more than 20 percent of the mass of solids applied
for the month; or to a calculated equivalent allowable mass based on
the organic HAP and solids contents of the inks, coatings, varnishes,
adhesives, primers, solvents, reducers, thinners, and other materials
applied for the month. * * *
* * * * *
    (6) Demonstrate that the total monthly organic HAP applied,
Happ, as determined by Equation 8, is less than the
calculated equivalent allowable organic HAP, Ha, as
determined by paragraph (e) of this section.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24MY06.002

Where:

Happ = Total monthly organic HAP applied, kg.
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (iii) Install continuous emission monitors to collect the data
necessary to calculate the total organic volatile matter mass flow in
the gas stream entering and the total organic volatile mass flow in the
gas stream exiting the solvent recovery device for each month such that
the percent control efficiency (E) of the solvent recovery device can
be calculated for the month. This requires continuous emission
monitoring of the total organic volatile matter concentration in the
gas stream entering the solvent recovery device, the total organic
volatile matter concentration in the gas stream exiting the solvent
recovery device, and the volumetric gas flow rate through the solvent
recovery device. A single continuous volumetric gas flow measurement
should be sufficient for a solvent recovery device since the inlet and
outlet volumetric gas flow rates for a solvent recovery device are
essentially equal. Each month's individual inlet concentration values
and corresponding individual gas flow rate values are multiplied and
then summed to get the total organic volatile matter mass flow in the
gas stream entering the solvent recovery device for the month. Each
month's individual outlet concentration values and corresponding
individual gas flow rate values are multiplied and then summed to get
the total organic volatile matter mass flow in the gas stream exiting
the solvent recovery device for the month.
* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (iv) If demonstrating compliance on the basis of organic HAP
emission rate based on solids applied, organic HAP emission rate based
on materials

applied, or emission of less than the calculated allowable organic HAP,
measure the mass of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer,
solvent, and other material applied on the press or group of presses
controlled by a common control device during the month.
* * * * *
    (2) Use continuous emission monitors, conduct an initial
performance test of capture efficiency, and continuously monitor a site
specific operating parameter to assure capture efficiency. The percent
control efficiency of the oxidizer shall be demonstrated in accordance
with the requirements of paragraph (c)(2) of this section except that
separate continuous volumetric gas flow measurements of the inlet and
outlet volumetric gas flow rates are required for an oxidizer.
* * * * *

0
7. Section 63.827 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii).
0
b. Revising paragraph (b).
0
c. Revising paragraph (c).
0
d. Revising paragraphs (d)(1)(vi) and (d)(1)(viii).
0
e. Revising paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.827  Performance Test Methods.

    (a) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (i) It is equipped with continuous emission monitors for
determining total organic volatile matter concentration and the
volumetric gas flow rate, and capture efficiency has been determined in
accordance with the requirements of this subpart, such that an overall
organic HAP control efficiency can be calculated, and
    (ii) The continuous emission monitors are used to demonstrate
continuous compliance in accordance with Sec.  63.824(b)(1)(ii), Sec.
63.825(b)(2)(ii), Sec.  63.825(c)(2), or Sec.  63.825(d)(2), as
applicable, and Sec.  63.828, or
* * * * *
    (b) Determination of the weight fraction organic HAP of inks,
coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents, thinners, reducers,
diluents, and other materials used by a publication rotogravure
affected source shall be conducted according to paragraph (b)(1) of
this section. Determination of the weight fraction organic HAP of inks,
coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents, thinners, reducers,
diluents, and other materials applied by a product and packaging
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing affected source shall be
conducted according to paragraph (b)(2) of this section. If the weight
fraction organic HAP values are not determined using the procedures in
paragraphs (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this section, the owner or operator must
submit an alternative test method for determining their values for
approval by the Administrator in accordance with Sec.  63.7(f). The
recovery efficiency of the test method must be determined for all of
the target organic HAP and a correction factor, if necessary, must be
determined and applied.
    (1) Each owner or operator of a publication rotogravure affected
source shall determine the weight fraction organic HAP of each ink,
coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent, and other material used by
following one of the procedures in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (iii)
of this section:
    (i) The owner or operator may test the material in accordance with
Method 311 of appendix A of this part. The Method 311 determination may
be performed by the owner or operator of the affected source, the
supplier of the material, or an independent third party. The organic
HAP content determined by Method 311 must be calculated according to
the criteria and procedures in paragraphs (b)(1)(i)(A) through (C) of
this section.
    (A) Include each organic HAP determined to be present at greater
than or equal to 0.1 weight percent for Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA)-defined carcinogens as specified in 29 CFR
1910.1200(d)(4) and greater than or equal to 1.0 weight percent for
other organic HAP compounds.
    (B) Express the weight fraction of each organic HAP included
according to paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A) of this section as a value
truncated to four places after the decimal point (for example, 0.3791).
    (C) Calculate the total weight fraction of organic HAP in the
tested material by summing the weight fraction of each organic HAP
included according to paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A) of this section and
truncating the result to three places after the decimal point (for
example, 0.763).
    (ii) The owner or operator may determine the weight fraction
volatile matter of the material in accordance with Sec.  63.827(c)(1)
and use this value for the weight fraction organic HAP for all
compliance purposes.
    (iii) The owner or operator may use formulation data to determine
the weight fraction organic HAP of a material. Formulation data may be
provided to the owner or operator on a CPDS by the supplier of the
material or an independent third party. Formulation data may be used
provided that the weight fraction organic HAP is calculated according
to the criteria and procedures in paragraphs (b)(1)(iii)(A) through (D)
of this section. In the event of an inconsistency between the
formulation data and the result of Method 311 of appendix A of this
part, where the test result is higher, the Method 311 data will take
precedence unless, after consultation, the owner or operator can
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the enforcement agency that the
formulation data are correct.
    (A) For each raw material used in making the material, include each
organic HAP present in that raw material at greater than or equal to
0.1 weight percent for OSHA-defined carcinogens as specified in 29 CFR
1910.1200(d)(4) and greater than or equal to 1.0 weight percent for
other organic HAP compounds. The weight fraction of each such organic
HAP in each raw material must be determined by Method 311 of appendix A
of this part, by an alternate method approved by the Administrator, or
from a CPDS provided by the raw material supplier or an independent
third party. The weight fraction of each such organic HAP in each raw
material must be expressed as a value truncated to four places after
the decimal point (for example, 0.1291).
    (B) For each raw material used in making the material, the weight
fraction contribution of each organic HAP, which is included according
to paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(A) of this section, in that raw material to
the weight fraction organic HAP of the material is calculated by
multiplying the weight fraction, truncated to four places after the
decimal point (for example, 0.1291), of that organic HAP in that raw
material times the weight fraction of that raw material, truncated to
four places after the decimal point (for example, 0.2246), in the
material. The product of each such multiplication is to be truncated to
four places after the decimal point (for example, 0.1291 times 0.2246
yields 0.02899586 which truncates to 0.0289).
    (C) For each organic HAP which is included according to paragraph
(b)(1)(iii)(A) of this section, the total weight fraction of that
organic HAP in the material is calculated by adding the weight fraction
contribution of that organic HAP from each raw material in which that
organic HAP is included according to paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(A) of this
section. The sum of each such addition must be expressed to four places
after the decimal point.
    (D) The total weight fraction of organic HAP in the material is the
sum of the counted individual organic HAP weight fractions. This sum
must be truncated to three places after the decimal point (for example,
0.763).
    (2) Each owner or operator of a product and packaging rotogravure
or

wide-web flexographic printing affected source shall determine the
organic HAP weight fraction of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive,
primer, solvent, and other material applied by following one of the
procedures in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section:
    (i) The owner or operator may test the material in accordance with
Method 311 of appendix A of this part. The Method 311 determination may
be performed by the owner or operator of the affected source, the
supplier of the material, or an independent third party. The organic
HAP content determined by Method 311 must be calculated according to
the criteria and procedures in paragraphs (b)(2)(i)(A) through (C) of
this section.
    (A) Include each organic HAP determined to be present at greater
than or equal to 0.1 weight percent for OSHA-defined carcinogens as
specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(d)(4) and greater than or equal to 1.0
weight percent for other organic HAP compounds.
    (B) Express the weight fraction of each organic HAP included
according to paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) of this section as a value
truncated to four places after the decimal point (for example, 0.3791).
    (C) Calculate the total weight fraction of organic HAP in the
tested material by summing the weight fraction of each organic HAP
included according to paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) of this section and
truncating the result to three places after the decimal point (for
example, 0.763).
    (ii) The owner or operator may determine the weight fraction
volatile matter of the material in accordance with Sec.  63.827(c)(2)
and use this value for the weight fraction organic HAP for all
compliance purposes.
    (iii) The owner or operator may use formulation data to determine
the weight fraction organic HAP of a material. Formulation data may be
provided to the owner or operator on a CPDS by the supplier of the
material or an independent third party. Formulation data may be used
provided that the weight fraction organic HAP is calculated according
to the criteria and procedures in paragraphs (b)(2)(iii)(A) through (D)
of this section. In the event of an inconsistency between the
formulation data and the result of Method 311 of appendix A of this
part, where the test result is higher, the Method 311 data will take
precedence unless, after consultation, the owner or operator can
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the enforcement agency that the
formulation data are correct.
    (A) For each raw material used in making the material, include each
organic HAP present in that raw material at greater than or equal to
0.1 weight percent for OSHA-defined carcinogens as specified in 29 CFR
1910.1200(d)(4) and greater than or equal to 1.0 weight percent for
other organic HAP compounds. The weight fraction of each such organic
HAP in each raw material must be determined by Method 311 of appendix A
of this part, by an alternate method approved by the Administrator, or
from a CPDS provided by the raw material supplier or an independent
third party. The weight fraction of each such organic HAP in each raw
material must be expressed as a value truncated to four places after
the decimal point (for example, 0.1291).
    (B) For each raw material used in making the material, the weight
fraction contribution of each organic HAP, which is included according
to paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(A) of this section, in that raw material to
the weight fraction organic HAP of the material is calculated by
multiplying the weight fraction, truncated to four places after the
decimal point (for example, 0.1291), of that organic HAP in that raw
material times the weight fraction of that raw material, truncated to
four places after the decimal point (for example, 0.2246), in the
material. The product of each such multiplication is truncated to four
places after the decimal point (for example, 0.1291 times 0.2246 yields
0.02899586 which truncates to 0.0289).
    (C) For each organic HAP which is included according to paragraph
(b)(2)(iii)(A) of this section, the total weight fraction of that
organic HAP in the material is calculated by adding the weight fraction
contribution of that organic HAP from each raw material in which that
organic HAP is included according to paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(A) of this
section. The sum of each such addition must be expressed to four places
after the decimal point.
    (D) The total weight fraction of organic HAP in the material is the
sum of the counted individual organic HAP weight fractions. This sum is
to be truncated to three places after the decimal point (for example,
0.763).
    (c) Determination of the weight fraction volatile matter content of
inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents, reducers,
thinners, diluents, and other materials used by a publication
rotogravure affected source shall be conducted according to paragraph
(c)(1) of this section. Determination of the weight fraction volatile
matter content and weight fraction solids content of inks, coatings,
varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents, reducers, thinners, diluents,
and other materials applied by a product and packaging rotogravure or
wide-web flexographic printing affected source shall be conducted
according to paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
    (1) Each owner or operator of a publication rotogravure affected
source shall determine the volatile matter weight fraction of each ink,
coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent, reducer, thinner, diluent,
and other material used by following the procedures in paragraph
(b)(1)(i) of this section, or by using formulation data as described in
paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
    (i) Determine the volatile matter weight fraction of the material
using Method 24A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A. The Method 24A
determination may be performed by the owner or operator of the affected
source, the supplier of the material, or an independent third party.
The Method 24A result shall be truncated to three places after the
decimal point (for example, 0.763). If these values cannot be
determined using Method 24A, the owner or operator shall submit an
alternative technique for determining their values for approval by the
Administrator.
    (2) Each owner or operator of a product and packaging rotogravure
or wide-web flexographic printing affected source shall determine the
volatile matter weight fraction and solids weight fraction of each ink,
coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent, reducer, thinner, diluent,
and other material applied by following the procedures in paragraphs
(b)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section, or by using formulation data as
described in paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
    (i) Determine the volatile matter weight fraction of the material
using Method 24 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A. The Method 24
determination may be performed by the owner or operator of the affected
source, the supplier of the material, or an independent third party.
The Method 24 result shall be truncated to three places after the
decimal point (for example, 0.763). If these values cannot be
determined using Method 24, the owner or operator shall submit an
alternative technique for determining their values for approval by the
Administrator.
    (ii) Calculate the solids weight fraction Method 24 result by
subtracting the volatile matter weight fraction Method 24 result from
1.000. This calculation may be performed by the owner or operator, the
supplier of the material, or an independent third party.
    (3) The owner or operator may use formulation data to determine the
volatile matter weight fraction or solids weight fraction of a
material. Formulation data may be provided to

the owner or operator on a CPDS by the supplier of the material or an
independent third party. The volatile matter weight fraction and solids
weight fraction shall be truncated to three places after the decimal
point (for example, 0.763). In the event of any inconsistency between
the formulation data and the result of Method 24 or Method 24A of 40
CFR part 60, appendix A, where the test result for volatile matter
weight fraction is higher or the test result for solids weight fraction
is lower, the applicable test method data will take precedence unless,
after consultation, the owner or operator can demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the enforcement agency that the formulation data are
correct.
    (d) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (vi) Method 25 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, shall be used to
determine organic volatile matter concentration, except as provided in
paragraphs (d)(1)(vi)(A) through (D) of this section. The owner or
operator shall submit notice of the intended test method to the
Administrator for approval along with notice of the performance test
required under Sec.  63.7(c). The same method must be used for both the
inlet and outlet measurements. The owner or operator may use Method 25A
of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, if (A) An exhaust gas organic volatile
matter concentration of 50 parts per million by volume (ppmv) or less
as carbon is required to comply with the standards of Sec. Sec.
63.824-63.825, or
    (B) The organic volatile matter concentration at the inlet to the
control system and the required level of control are such to result in
exhaust gas organic volatile matter concentrations of 50 ppmv or less
as carbon, or
    (C) Because of the high efficiency of the control device, the
anticipated organic volatile matter concentration at the control device
exhaust is 50 ppmv or less as carbon, regardless of inlet
concentration, or
    (D) The control device is not an oxidizer.
* * * * *
    (viii) Organic volatile matter mass flow rates shall be determined
using Equation 20:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24MY06.003

Where:

Mf = Total organic volatile matter mass flow rate, kg/hour
(h).
Qsd = Volumetric flow rate of gases entering or exiting the
control device, as determined according to Sec.  63.827(d)(1)(ii), dry
standard cubic meters (dscm)/h.
Cc = Concentration of organic compounds as carbon, ppmv.
12.0 = Molecular weight of carbon.
0.0416 = Conversion factor for molar volume, kg-moles per cubic meter
* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (1) You may assume your capture efficiency equals 100 percent if
your capture system is a permanent total enclosure (PTE). You must
confirm that your capture system is a PTE by demonstrating that it
meets the requirements of section 6 of Method 204 of 40 CFR part 51,
appendix M, and that all exhaust gases from the enclosure are delivered
to a control device.
    (2) You may determine capture efficiency according to the protocols
for testing with temporary total enclosures that are specified in
Methods 204 and 204A through F of 40 CFR part 51, appendix M. You may
exclude never controlled work stations from such capture efficiency
determinations.
* * * * *

0
8. Section 63.828 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(3) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.828  Monitoring Requirements.

    (a) * * *
    (3) An owner or operator complying with Sec. Sec.  63.824-63.825
through continuous emission monitoring of a control device shall
install, calibrate, operate, and maintain continuous emission monitors
to measure total organic volatile matter concentration and volumetric
gas flow rate in accordance with Sec.  63.824(b)(1)(ii), Sec.
63.825(b)(2)(ii), Sec.  63.825(c)(2), or Sec.  63.825(d)(2), as
applicable.
* * * * *

0
9. Section 63.829 is amended by revising paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2)
to read as follows:

Sec.  63.829  Recordkeeping Requirements.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (1) For each facility which meets the criteria of Sec.
63.821(b)(1), the owner or operator shall maintain records of the total
mass of each material applied on product and packaging rotogravure or
wide-web flexographic printing presses during each month.
    (2) For each facility which meets the criteria of Sec.
63.821(b)(2), the owner or operator shall maintain records of the total
mass and organic HAP content of each material applied on product and
packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing presses during
each month.
* * * * *

0
10. Section 63.830 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(6) introductory
text to read as follows:

Sec.  63.830  Reporting Requirements.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (6) A summary report specified in Sec.  63.10(e)(3) of this part
shall be submitted on a semi-annual basis (i.e., once every 6-month
period). These summary reports are required even if the affected source
does not have any control devices or does not take the performance of
any control devices into account in demonstrating compliance with the
emission limitations in Sec.  63.824 or Sec.  63.825. In addition to a
report of operating parameter exceedances as required by Sec.
63.10(e)(3)(i), the summary report shall include, as applicable:
* * * * *

0
11. Appendix A is amended by revising paragraphs 3.2 and 4.8 to read as
follows:

Appendix A to Subpart KK of Part 63--Data Quality Objective and Lower
Confidence Limit Approaches for Alternative Capture Efficiency
Protocols and Test Methods

* * * * *
    3.2 The DQO calculation is made as follows using Equations 1 and 2:
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24MY06.004

    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24MY06.005

Where:

a = Distance from the average measured CE value to the endpoints of the
95-percent (two-sided) confidence interval for the measured value.

n = Number of valid test runs.
P = DQO indicator statistic, distance from the average measured CE
value to the endpoints of the 95-percent (two-sided) confidence
interval, expressed as a percent of the average measured CE value.
s = Sample standard deviation.
t0.975 = t-value at the 95-percent (two-sided) confidence
level (see Table A-1).
xavg = Average measured CE value (calculated from all valid
test runs).
xi = The CE value calculated from the ith test run.

                          Table A-1.--t-Values
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Number of valid test runs, n               t0.975     t0.90
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 or 2............................................        N/A        N/A
3.................................................      4.303      1.886
4.................................................      3.182      1.638
5.................................................      2.776      1.533
6.................................................      2.571      1.476
7.................................................      2.447      1.440
8.................................................      2.365      1.415
9.................................................      2.306      1.397
10................................................      2.262      1.383
11................................................      2.228      1.372
12................................................      2.201      1.363
13................................................      2.179      1.356
14................................................      2.160      1.350
15................................................      2.145      1.345
16................................................      2.131      1.341
17................................................      2.120      1.337
18................................................      2.110      1.333
19................................................      2.101      1.330
20................................................      2.093      1.328
21................................................      2.086      1.325
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    4.8 The LCL is calculated at an 80 percent (two-sided) confidence
level as follows using Equation 11:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24MY06.006

Where:

LC1 = LCL at an 80-percent (two-sided) confidence level.
n = Number of valid test runs.
s = Sample standard deviation.
t0.90 = t-value at the 80-percent (two-sided) confidence
level (see Table A-1).
xavg = Average measured CE value (calculated from all valid
test runs).
* * * * *

Subpart JJJJ--[Amended]

0
12. Section 63.3300 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.3300  Which of my emission sources are affected by this
subpart?

* * * * *
    (a) Any web coating line that is stand-alone equipment under
subpart KK of this part (National Emission Standards for the Printing
and Publishing Industry) which the owner or operator includes in the
affected source under subpart KK.
* * * * *

Subpart OOOO--[Amended]

0
13. Section 63.4281 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (d) introductory text.
0
b. Adding paragraphs (d)(4) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.4281  Am I subject to this subpart?

* * * * *
    (d) Web coating lines specified in paragraphs (d)(1) through (4) of
this section are not part of the affected source of this subpart.
* * * * *
    (4) Any web coating line that coats or prints fabric or other
textiles for use in flexible packaging and that is included in an
affected source under subpart KK of this part (National Emission
Standards for the Printing and Publishing Industry).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 06-4821 Filed 5-23-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P