Docket Index Table of Contents
A.	U.S. EPA Rulemakings, Guidance Documents, Informational Memoranda, Technical Support Documents, Memoranda to File, and Data Analysis Documents	1
B.	State Plans, Rules, Support Documents, Reports, and Correspondence	2
C.	Notice of Proposed Rulemaking	3
D.	Public Comments and Related Documents	3
E.	Additional Documents Considered for Final Rulemaking	3
F.	Notice of Final Rulemaking	4

U.S. EPA Rulemakings, Guidance Documents, Informational Memoranda, Technical Support Documents, Memoranda to File, and Data Analysis Documents
52 FR 24634, Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Final rule (July 1, 1987).
71 FR 61144, National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Final rule (October 17, 2006).
58 FR 67334, Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Final rule (December 21, 1993).
67 FR 7082, Clean Air Act Attainment Finding; Bullhead City and Payson Nonattainment Areas, AZ; Sacramento and San Bernardino Nonattainment Areas, CA; Particulate Matter of 10 Microns or Less (PM-10); Final rule (February 15, 2002).
67 FR 43020, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes: Arizona; Direct final rule (June 26, 2002).
Memorandum dated September 4, 1992, from John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality Management Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. EPA, to Air Division Directors, Regions I-X, entitled "Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to Attainment."
Memorandum dated August 9, 2001, from Lydia Wegman, Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, to Directors of EPA Regional Air Programs entitled "Limited Maintenance Plan Option for Moderate PM10 Nonattainment Areas."
Letter dated October 29, 2021, from Gwen Yoshimura, Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office, EPA Region IX, to Daniel Czecholinski, Director, Air Quality Division, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality.
Letter dated April 25, 2019, from Elizabeth J. Adams, Director, Air Quality Analysis Office, EPA Region IX, to Timothy J. Franquist, Director, Air Quality Division, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality.
EPA Air Quality System Air Monitoring Program (AMP) 450 Quicklook Criteria Parameters for 2001-2021, accessed November 5, 2021.
EPA Air Quality System Air Monitoring Program (AMP) 480 Design Value Report for 2001-2021, accessed November 5, 2021.
EPA PM10 Design Value Spreadsheet, August 6th, 2015.
Technical Support Document (TSD) for EPA's Rulemaking for the Arizona State Implementation Plan; Bullhead City Area 2[nd] Period Limited Maintenance Plan (LMP); November 2021.
Emissions Inventory Data AZ 2011 2014 2017.xlsx

State Plans, Rules, Support Documents, Reports, and Correspondence
State Implementation Plan Submissions Addressed by this Rulemaking
Letter dated May 24, 2012, from Eric Massey, Director, Air Quality Division, ADEQ, to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, including enclosures.
Arizona Revised Statutes
ADEQ, "State Implementation Plan Completeness Checklist, Submittal of Final Update of the Limited Maintenance Plan for the Bullhead City PM10 Maintenance Area"
ADEQ, "Arizona State Implementation Revision: Limited Maintenance Plan Update for the Bullhead City PM10 Maintenance Area (2012)."
ADEQ, "Public Process Documentation"

 Additional State Documents
ADEQ, Bullhead City Moderate Area PM10 Maintenance Plan and Request for Redesignation to Attainment, February 2002.
Letter dated April 26, 2021, from Daniel Czecholinski, Director, Air Quality Division, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, to Gwen Yoshimura, Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office, EPA Region 9.
ADEQ, "Bullhead City Update using MOVES," November 8, 2013.
Email dated October 26, 2021, from Jessica Wood, CARB, to Panah Stauffer, EPA Region IX, Subject: "Bullhead City EI Analysis."
Attachment: Bullhead EI workbook.xlsx.
Letter dated November 12, 2003, from Stephen A. Owens, Director, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, to Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, "Re: Demonstration of continued maintenance of the PM10 NAAQS for the Bullhead City PM10 Area."
Letter dated October 6, 2005, from Stephen A. Owens, Director, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, to Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, "Re: Maintenance of the PM10 NAAQS and Limited Maintenance Plan design values for the Bullhead City PM10 maintenance area  -  1999-2003."
Letter dated June 7, 2006, from Stephen A. Owens, Director, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, to Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, "Re: Maintenance of the PM10 NAAQS and Limited Maintenance Plan design values for the Bullhead City PM10 maintenance area  -  2001-2005."
Letter dated June 7, 2007, from Stephen A. Owens, Director, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, to Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, "Re: Maintenance of the PM10 NAAQS and Limited Maintenance Plan design values for the Bullhead City PM10 maintenance area  -  2002-2006."
Letter dated July 11, 2008, from Stephen A. Owens, Director, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, to Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, "Re: Maintenance of the PM10 NAAQS and Limited Maintenance Plan design values for the Bullhead City PM10 maintenance area  -  2003-2007."
Letter dated July 13, 2009, from Benjamin H. Grumbles, Director, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, to Ms. Laura Yoshii, Acting Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, "Re: Maintenance of the PM10 NAAQS and Limited Maintenance Plan design values for the Bullhead City PM10 maintenance area  -  2004-2008."
Letter dated August 29, 2012, from Eric Massey, Director, Air Quality Division, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, "Re: 2012 Limited Maintenance Plan Annual Report for the Bullhead City PM10 Maintenance Area."
Sonoma Technology, Inc., State of Arizona Exceptional Event Documentation for the Event of August 19, 2011, for the Bullhead City PM10 Maintenance Area, May 2013.
Sonoma Technology, Inc., State of Arizona Exceptional Event Documentation for the Event of August 15, 2012, for the Bullhead City PM10 Maintenance Area, June 2013.
Letter dated October 8, 2013, from Eric Massey, Director, Air Quality Division, ADEQ, to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, "Re: 2013 Limited Maintenance Plan Annual Report for the Bullhead City PM10 Maintenance Area."
Letter dated June 23, 2016, from Timothy Franquist, Director, Air Quality Division, ADEQ, to Alexis Strauss, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, "Re: CY 2013 Limited Maintenance Plan Annual Report for the Bullhead City PM10 Maintenance Area."
Letter dated June 23, 2016, from Timothy Franquist, Director, Air Quality Division, ADEQ, to Alexis Strauss, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, "Re: CY 2014 Limited Maintenance Plan Annual Report for the Bullhead City PM10 Maintenance Area."
Letter dated August 16, 2016, from Timothy Franquist, Director, Air Quality Division, ADEQ, to Alexis Strauss, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, "Re: CY 2015 Limited Maintenance Plan Annual Report for the Bullhead City PM10 Maintenance Area."
Letter dated June 23, 2017, from Timothy Franquist, Director, Air Quality Division, ADEQ, to Alexis Strauss, Acting Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, "Re: CY 2016 Limited Maintenance Plan Annual Report for the Bullhead City PM10 Maintenance Area."
Letter from Timothy S. Franquist, Director, Air Quality Division, ADEQ, to Mike Stoker, Regional Administrator, EPA, Region IX, "Re: CY 2017 Limited Maintenance Plan Annual Report for the Bullhead City PM10 Maintenance Area."
Letter dated August 16, 2019 from Timothy S. Franquist, Director, Air Quality Division, ADEQ, to Mike Stoker, Regional Administrator, EPA, Region IX, "Re: CY 2018 Limited Maintenance Plan Annual Report for the Bullhead City PM10 Maintenance Area."
Letter dated November 19, 2020 from Daniel Czecholinski, Director, Air Quality Division, ADEQ, to John Busterud, Regional Administrator, EPA, Region IX, "Re: CY 2019 Limited Maintenance Plan Annual Report for the Bullhead City PM10 Maintenance Area."
Letter dated October 7, 2021 from Daniel Czecholinski, Director, Air Quality Division, ADEQ, to Deborah Jordan, Acting Regional Administrator, EPA, Region IX, "Re: CY 2020 Limited Maintenance Plan Annual Report for the Bullhead City PM10 Maintenance Area."

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
86 FR 56848, Second 10-Year Maintenance Plan for the Indian Wells Valley PM10 Planning Area; California; Proposed rule (October 13, 2021).
Public Comments and Related Documents
<RESERVED>
Additional Documents Considered for Final Rulemaking
<RESERVED>
Notice of Final Rulemaking
<RESERVED>


[Federal Register: March 15, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 50)]
[Notices]
[Page 12200-12202]
[DOCID:fr15mr07-101]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2007-0014]

Standard on Additional Requirements for Special Dipping and
Coating Operations (Dip Tanks); Extension of the Office of Management
and Budget's Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirement

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comment concerning its proposal to extend
OMB approval of the information collection requirement specified in its
standard on Additional Requirements for Special Dipping and Coating
Operations (Dip Tanks) (29 CFR 1910.126(g)(4)). The provision is to
ensure that employers make employees aware of the minimum distance
between goods being electrostatically deteared.

DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by
May 14, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal

eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting
comments.
    Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
    Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger, or courier service:
When using this method, you must submit three copies of your comments
and attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, OSHA Docket No. OSHA-2007-
0014, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210. Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger, and courier
service) are accepted during the Department of Labor's and Docket
Office's normal business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number for the ICR (OSHA Docket No. OSHA-2007-0014). All
comments, including any personal information you provide, are placed in
the public docket without change, and may be made available online at
http:// www.regulations.gov. For further information on submitting

comments see the ``Public Participation'' heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
    Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at

the address above. All documents in the docket (including this Federal
Register notice) are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index;

however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly
available to read or download through the Web site. All submissions,
including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and
copying at the OSHA Docket Office. You may also contact Theda Kenney at
the address below to obtain a copy of the ICR.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theda Kenney or Todd Owen, Directorate
of Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-3609,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693-2222.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information
collection requirements in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that
information is in the desired format, reporting burden (time and costs)
is minimal, collection instruments are clearly understood, and OSHA's
estimate of the information collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651
et seq.) authorizes information collection by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the Act or for developing information
regarding the causes and prevention of occupational injuries,
illnesses, and accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also requires
that OSHA obtain such information with minimum burden upon employers,
especially those operating small businesses, and to reduce to the
maximum extent feasible unnecessary duplication of efforts in obtaining
information (29 U.S.C. 657).
    The standard on Additional Requirements for Special Dipping and
Coating Operations, 29 CFR 1910.126(g)(4)), requires employers to post
a conspicuous sign near each piece of electrostatic detearing equipment
that notifies employees of the minimum safe distance they must maintain
between goods undergoing electrostatic detearing and the electrodes or
conductors of the equipment used in the process. Doing so reduces the
likelihood of igniting the explosive chemicals used in electrostatic
detearing operations.

II. Special Issues for Comment

    OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:
     Whether the proposed information collection requirement is
necessary for the proper performance of the Agency's functions to
protect employees, including whether the information is useful;
     The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and
costs) of the information collection requirement, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
     The quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
     Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply;
for example, by using automated or other technological information
collection and transmission techniques.

III. Proposed Actions

    OSHA is requesting that OMB extend its approval of the information
collection requirement contained in the Standard on Additional
Requirements for Special Dipping and Coating Operations (Dip Tanks) (29
CFR 1910.126(g)(4)). The Agency is requesting to retain its previous
burden hour estimate of 1 hour. The Agency will summarize the comments
submitted in response to this notice, and will include this summary in
the request to OMB.
    Type of Review: Extension of currently approved information
collection requirement.
    Title: Standard on Additional Requirements for Special Dipping and
Coating Operations (Dip Tanks) (29 CFR 1910.126).
    OMB Number: 1218-0237.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    Number of Respondents: 0.
    Frequency of Recordkeeping: On occasion.
    Total Responses: 1.
    Average Time Per Response: 0.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1.
    Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance). $0.

IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on this Notice and
Internet Access to Comments and Submissions

    You may submit comments in response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal

eRulemaking Portal; (2) by facsimile (FAX); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number for the ICR (OSHA Docket No. OSHA-2007-
0014). You may supplement electronic submissions by uploading document
files electronically. If you wish to mail additional materials in
reference to an electronic or facsimile submission, you must submit
them to the OSHA Docket Office (see the section of this notice titled
ADDRESSES). The additional

materials must clearly identify your electronic comments by your name,
date, and the docket number so the Agency can attach them to your
comments.
    Because of security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the delivery of materials by hand,
express delivery, messenger, or courier service, please contact the
OSHA Docket Office at<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>).
    Comments and submissions are posted without change at http://www.regulations.gov.
 Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about

submitting personal information such as social security numbers and
date of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov
 index, some information (e.g., copyrighted

material) is not publicly available to read or download through this
website. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available
for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. Information on
using the http://www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments and

access the docket is available at the Web site's ``User Tips'' link.
Contact the OSHA Docket Office for information about materials not
available through the Web site, and for assistance in using the
Internet to locate docket submissions.
    Electronic copies of this Federal Register document are available
at http:// www.regulations.gov. This document as well as news releases

and other relevant information also are available at OSHA's webpage at
http://www.osha.gov.

V. Authority and Signature

    Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this notice. The
authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 5-2002 (67 FR
65008).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on March 9, 2007.
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.
Assistant Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. E7-4702 Filed 3-14-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 55 (Monday, March 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15260-15262]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06513]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-74518; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2015-022]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to
Rule 4751(h)(5) Relating to Market Hours IOC Orders

March 17, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 6, 2015, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to simplify processing of Market Hours IOC
orders and to make clarifying changes to the rule text of Rule
4751(h)(5).
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to modify the time that Market Hours IOC
(``MIOC'') orders are available for entry into the System.\3\ MIOC is a
Time in Force \4\ characteristic of an order that will cause it (or
unexecuted portion thereof) to be canceled if, after entry into the
System the order (or unexecuted portion thereof) becomes non-marketable
during the Regular Market Session, 9:30 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. Eastern
Time.\5\ Pursuant to Rule 4751(h)(5), MIOC Orders are available for
entry from 4:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time; however, a MIOC
order entered between 4:00 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time is held by
the System until 9:30 a.m. at which time the System shall determine
whether the order is marketable and either execute or be canceled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ As defined by Rule 47151(a). All times noted herein are in
Eastern Time, unless otherwise noted.
    \4\ Time in Force is the period of time that the System will
hold an order for potential execution. See Rule 4751(h).
    \5\ As defined by Rule 4120(b)(4)(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NASDAQ is proposing to simplify the processing of MIOC orders to
make it consistent with the meaning of a Time in Force of immediate or
cancel \6\ and is adding clarifying rule text concerning when such
orders are available for entry and potential execution. Specifically,
the Exchange is proposing to only accept MIOC orders after completion
of the NASDAQ Opening Cross.\7\ The Opening Cross is NASDAQ's process
for matching orders at the launch of the regular trading hours, and is
open to all NASDAQ listed securities and NMS securities listed on other
national securities exchanges (collectively, ``System Securities'').\8\
Regular Market Session trading begins in an individual System Security
at the completion of its opening cross. As a consequence of the
proposed change, NASDAQ will not hold MIOC orders entered from 4:00
a.m. up to the completion of the NASDAQ Opening Cross, but rather will
not accept the order for execution and return it to the member firm.
NASDAQ is not proposing to change how the MIOC order operates, but only
the time during which a MIOC order may be entered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ An order designated as ``immediate or cancel'' represents
the entering member firm's desire for the order to either execute
immediately after the System determines whether the order is
marketable or be canceled.
    \7\ See Rule 4752. Beginning at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time, the
System will execute crosses in each individual security traded on
NASDAQ one by one. The order in which each security is processed is
random and differs day by day. Upon completion of an individual
security's cross, Regular Market Session trading begins. The Opening
Cross process is normally completed in less than one second.
    \8\ NASDAQ notes that it initiates an Opening Cross in all
System Securities for which there are orders that will execute
against contra-side orders at 9:30 a.m., at which time the opening
book and the NASDAQ continuous book are brought together to create
single NASDAQ opening prices for System Securities. In certain
cases, a System Security will not have any contra-side interest for
execution in the Opening Cross, or any orders whatsoever, when the
Opening Cross process is initiated. When this occurs, NASDAQ
executes a ``null cross'' instead, whereby no securities are matched
yet the System receives the necessary precondition to regular hours
trading that a ``cross'' in the security has occurred. After
completion of the null cross, regular hours trading begins by
integrating Market Hours Orders into the book in time priority and
executing in accordance with market hours rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NASDAQ is accordingly deleting text from Rule 4751(h) that
discusses MIOC order entry beginning at 4:00 a.m. Eastern Time and that
NASDAQ will hold MIOC orders entered prior to 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time
until 9:30 a.m. NASDAQ is also consolidating existing rule text and
adding new text under the rule to make it clear that MIOC orders may be
entered and potentially executed beginning after the completion of the
NASDAQ Opening Cross.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule changes are consistent
with Section 6 of the Act,\9\ in general, and further the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ in particular, in that they are
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest; and are not
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers. Specifically, the proposed changes promote just
and equitable principles of trade and perfect the mechanisms of a free
and open market and the national market system by simplifying
processing of orders that are designated to immediately execute or be
canceled during the Regular Market Session. Under the current rule,
NASDAQ must hold MIOC orders entered from 4:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.
Eastern Time, during which member firms may cancel and reenter such
orders. By preventing MIOC order entry during this time, NASDAQ is
making the processing of orders designated as MIOC consistent with the
logic of immediate or cancel functionality, namely to execute
immediately or be cancelled back in whole or in part. Moreover, NASDAQ
is adding language to the rule to make it clear when MIOC orders are
available for both entry and potential execution. As discussed above,
completion of the NASDAQ Opening Cross in a security marks the
beginning of Regular Market Hours trading. Accordingly, the changes
proposed herein both simplify the processing of MIOC orders and clarify
the rule text, consistent with the objectives of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
Specifically, the changes are designed to promote consistency in the
handling of immediate or cancel-designated orders and to provide
clarity on when such orders are available for both entry and potential
execution. Such changes do not place a burden on competition between
market participants as the changes are applied consistently to all
participants. Moreover, the proposed changes do not impose a burden on
competition among exchanges as they are done in the interest of
providing clarity and consistency in its rules, and are therefore
irrelevant to competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) [sic] of the Act \11\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\12\ At any time within 60

days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the
public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii)
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(ii) [sic].
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2015-022 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2015-022. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2015-022 and should
be submitted on or before April 13, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06513 Filed 3-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65765-65767]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26336]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2014-0091]

Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of
information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and reinstatements of previously
approved collections.
    This document describes an Information Collection Request (ICR) for
which NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before January 5, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA-2014-0091 using any of the following methods:
    Electronic submissions: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting comments.
    Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
    Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the
Docket number for this Notice. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Wigle, Division Chief, Impaired
Driving Division (NTI-111), Office of Impaired Driving and Occupant
Protection, National Highway Traffic

Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W44-301, Washington,
DC 20590. Ms. Wigle's phone number is<PHONE_NUMBER> and her email
address is<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
    (i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
    (ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
    (iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
    (iv) How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
    In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks public comment on
the following proposed collection of information:
    Title--Special Study on 18-24 Year Old Drivers Involved in Alcohol-
Related Motor Vehicle Crashes
    Type of Request--New information collection request
    OMB Clearance Number--None.
    Form Number--This collection of information uses no standard form
    Requested Expiration Date of Approval--3 years from date of
approval.
    Summary of the Collection of Information--NHTSA has been
particularly concerned with 18- to-24-year-old drivers' propensity for
high-risk driving behaviors and overrepresentation in impaired driving
crashes. While data collection efforts exist to identify basic
demographics and some details of crash involvement, there is
insufficient information to define the characteristics, circumstances,
and patterns of 18-to-24-year-old drivers involved in alcohol-related
motor vehicle crashes. NHTSA needs this information to design programs
that are most likely to affect this age group. NHTSA plans to collect
and analyze information on: (1) Environmental or behavioral conditions
that may have played a role in the cause of the crash, (2) whether
there is a correlation between trip purpose, type, frequency,
departure, destination, or familiarity of location, (3) determine,
other than age, if there are demographic commonalities, (4) determine
methods of message delivery to be most highly accepted among this
group.
    Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information--NHTSA was established by the Highway Safety Act of 1970
(23 U.S.C. 101) to carry out the Congressional mandate to reduce the
mounting number of deaths, injuries, and economic losses resulting from
motor vehicle crashes on the Nation's highways. As part of this
statutory mandate, NHTSA is authorized to conduct research as a
foundation for the development of motor vehicle safety standards and
traffic safety programs.
    Every year, alcohol-impaired driving fatalities account for more
than 30 percent of the total motor vehicle traffic fatalities in the
United States. In 2012, 10,322 people died in alcohol-impaired-driving
crashes. Yearly data from the National Center for Statistics and
Analysis (NCSA) consistently show that nearly 30 percent of drivers age
18-24 involved in fatal crashes are alcohol impaired (BAC .08+). In
addition, a significant amount of research has indicated that heavy and
binge drinking, as well as signs of alcohol dependence and abuse, is
high among this age group.
    In support of its mission, NHTSA proposes to gather information on
drivers age 18-24 involved in alcohol-related crashes and the
circumstances of these crashes. A sample of non-alcohol-related crashes
involving drivers age 18-24 will also be collected as a comparison
group. NHTSA is requesting approval to gather information through the
National Center for Statistics and Analysis (NCSA) new record-based
data collection system to be launched in January 2016, which will
replace the National Automotive Sampling System General Estimates
System (NASS GES), and is called the Crash Report Sampling System
(CRSS). NHTSA would like to gather additional information that isn't
currently being collected. NHTSA did not identify any national
databases with detailed information on impaired drivers age 18-24 and
specifically the characteristics, circumstances, and patterns of being
involved in alcohol-related crashes.
    NHTSA is seeking approval to collect data from surviving drivers,
who were age 18-24 years old at the time of the crash, on driver
demographics, driving behavior, contributing crash factors, and other
circumstances. If the driver is unavailable, NHTSA will collect data
from surviving passengers of the vehicle driven by the 18-24 year old.
NHTSA, other federal agencies such as the National Institute for
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), state and local governments,
safety research organizations, and universities will use the data to
design, develop, or determine which countermeasures are most likely to
reduce impaired driving among 18 to 24 year olds. The purpose of this
data collection is to provide critical information needed by NHTSA to
design effective countermeasures that meet the Agency's mandate to
improve highway traffic safety.
    Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number,
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)--
The drivers and passengers will be identified through police reported
crashes of which there are over 5 million every year. From the
identified crashes involving 18-24 year old drivers, a random sample of
reported crashes will be selected and weighted for a geographic
representation of the nation. Since the data collection effort is
intended to gather information on drivers involved in alcohol-related
crashes and the circumstances of these crashes, a balanced
representation of non-alcohol and alcohol-related crashes are required
to make any meaningful findings. According to the General Estimates
System (GES) 2012 file, 1,026 of 18,566 total drivers ages 18 to 24
were in alcohol-related crashes. To show comparisons and identify
patterns between drivers involved and not involved in alcohol-related
crashes at significant confidence levels and considering a response
rate at 10%, investigators will need to make approximately 4,100 calls
for an estimated 410 possible completed interviews. NHTSA proposes to
make 6,000 contacts to be able to interview approximately 600
participants in 36 months. Participants are the surviving drivers and
passengers who have detailed knowledge of the crash and the driver
involved. Data will be collected by staff contracted to NHTSA under the
CRSS program. Special investigators will use telephone and in-person
interviews to gather information. Investigators may also make contact
by sending a questionnaire by mail.

    Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of Information--NHTSA estimates 30
minutes for each interview for an estimated an annual burden of 100
hours and a total burden of 300 hours over a three year period. Based
on median per capita income, the maximum total input cost, if all
respondents were interviewed on the job, is estimated as follows:
$22.01 per hour x 100 interviewing hours = $2,201 per year and $6,603
total over a three year period. There are no record keeping or
reporting costs to respondents. All responses are provided
spontaneously. Each respondent only participates once in the data
collection. Thus there is no preparation of data required or expected
of respondents. Respondents do not incur: (a) Capital and startup
costs, or (b) operation, maintenance, and purchase costs for
interviewing

    Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)

    Dated: October 31, 2014.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2014-26336 Filed 11-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 15, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2421-2422]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00489]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0742; FRL-10004-18-OAR]

Information Collection Request; Comment Request; Air Pollution
Regulations for Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Activities

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is planning to submit an
information collection request (ICR), ``Air Pollution Regulations for
Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Activities'' (EPA ICR No. 1601.10, OMB
Control No. 2060-0249), to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Before doing so, the EPA is soliciting
public comments on specific aspects of the proposed information
collection as described below. This is a proposed renewal of the ICR,
which is currently approved through September 30, 2020. An Agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 16, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2011-0724, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by
email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben Garwood, Air Quality Policy
Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, C504-03, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Supporting documents which explain in detail the information that
the EPA will be collecting are available in the public docket for this
ICR. The docket can be viewed online at www.regulations.gov or in
person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone number for the Docket Center is
(202) 566-1744. For additional information about EPA's public docket,
visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. The
EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval. At that time, the EPA will issue another Federal
Register notice to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB.
    Abstract: Section 328 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) gives the EPA
responsibility for regulating air pollution from OCS sources located
offshore of the states along the Atlantic and Pacific Coasts (except
the North Slope Borough of Alaska), and along the eastern Gulf of
Mexico coast (off the coast of Florida). In general, these OCS sources
must obtain OCS permits complying with the EPA's preconstruction permit
program (usually Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
requirements) and title V operating permit program, and then maintain
ongoing compliance with their permit conditions. Industry respondents
include owners or

operators of existing and new or modified OCS sources. These
respondents must prepare permit applications and, after receiving their
permits, conduct testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting as
required by their permits. The recordkeeping and reporting requirements
are necessary so that the EPA can determine whether these sources are
meeting all the requirements that apply to them. The EPA has delegated
the authority to implement and enforce the OCS regulations for sources
located off the coast of California to four local air pollution control
agencies, and for sources located off a portion of the Atlantic Coast
to three state agencies. These agency respondents must review sources'
permit applications and reports, issue permits, observe performance
tests and conduct inspections to ensure that the sources are meeting
all the requirements that apply to them. Section 176(c) of the CAA (42
U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) requires that all federal actions conform with the
State Implementation Plans to attain and maintain the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards.
    Depending on the type of action, the federal entities must collect
information themselves, hire consultants to collect the information or
require applicants/sponsors of the federal action to provide the
information.
    The type and quantity of information required will depend on the
circumstances surrounding the action. First, the entity must make an
applicability determination. If the source is located within 25 miles
of the state's seaward boundary as established in the regulations, the
requirements are the same as those that would be applicable if the
source were located in the corresponding onshore area. Sources locating
beyond 25 nautical miles from the state seaward boundary are subject to
federal air quality requirements which could include the EPA's PSD
preconstruction permit program, Part 71 Title V operating permit
program, New Source Performance Standards and some standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants promulgated under section 112 of the CAA.
State and local air pollution control agencies are usually requested to
provide information concerning regulation of offshore sources and are
provided opportunities to comment on the proposed determinations. The
public is also provided an opportunity to comment on the proposed
determinations.
    Form numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Entities potentially affected by
this action are those that must apply for and obtain an OCS permit
pursuant the OCS permit program. In addition, state and local agencies
that have been delegated authority to implement and enforce the OCS
permit program, which must review permit applications and issue
permits, are affected entities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory [see 40 CFR part 55].
    Estimated number of respondents: 29 industrial facilities and 7
state and local permitting agencies.
    Frequency of response: On occasion, as necessary.
    Total estimated burden: 20,223 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $1,876,567 (per year). This includes $21,496
annually in Operation and Maintenance costs.
    Changes in estimates: There is a decrease of 6,707 hours in the
total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR most recently
approved by OMB. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in the
projected number of OCS sources subject to the program.

    Dated: January 9, 2020.
Scott Mathias,
Acting Director, Air Quality Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 2020-00489 Filed 1-14-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: October 8, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 194)]
[Notices]
[Page 51895-51896]
[DOCID:fr08oc09-92]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60780; File No. SR-ISE-2009-71]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to PrecISE Fees

October 2, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on September 30, 2009, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(the ``Exchange'' or ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The ISE proposes to amend its fees relating to the Exchange's
proprietary PrecISE Trade[supreg] order entry terminals. The text of
the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site
(http://www.ise.com), at the principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to amend ISE's fees
relating to the Exchange's proprietary PrecISE Trade[supreg] order
entry terminals. First, the Exchange currently has a monthly PrecISE
sponsored customer fee of $250 per terminal, with a maximum of $1,500
per sponsored customer. A ``Sponsored Customer'' is a non-Member of the
Exchange that trades under a sponsoring Member's execution and clearing
identity. The Exchange permits Sponsored Customers of Members to access
the Exchange directly via a PrecISE trade terminal, provided certain
conditions are met. The Exchange's sponsored customer fees have been in
place since 2007.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Exchange Act Release No. 34-56496 (September 21, 2007),
72 FR 55268 (September 28, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Earlier this year, the Exchange amended its PrecISE terminal fees
by increasing those fees from $300 to $350 per month for the first 10
users and from $50 to $100 per month for all subsequent users.\4\ The
Exchange increased its PrecISE terminal fees to cover its costs of
building out an enhanced PrecISE terminal. The PrecISE terminals that
sponsored customers use have the same functionalities as the terminals
that are used by ISE Members. ISE now proposes to amend its PrecISE
sponsored customer fee by aligning this fee with its PrecISE terminal
fees. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to increase its PrecISE
sponsored customer fee from $300 to $350 per terminal per month for the
first 10 users and from $50 to $100 per month for all subsequent users.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Exchange Act Release No. 34-60208 (July 1, 2009), 74 FR
33012 (July 9, 2009) (the ``PrecISE Fee Filing'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the PrecISE Fee Filing, the Exchange also changed the method for
calculating its PrecISE terminal fees.\5\ ISE now proposes to adopt the
same method for calculating its PrecISE sponsored customer fee that it
currently uses for calculating the PrecISE terminal fee, which is to
charge users for the total number of logins used during a month per
Sponsored Customer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, the Exchange proposes to remove the PrecISE through VPN fee
from its fee schedule. The Exchange no longer supports a PrecISE
through VPN

connection. Members that used to connect to the Exchange through a VPN
now connect to the Exchange via the Internet.
    These proposed fee changes will be operative on October 1, 2009.
2. Statutory Basis
    The basis under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Exchange
Act'') for this proposed rule change is the requirement under Section
6(b)(4) that an exchange have an equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among its members and other persons using
its facilities. In particular, these fees will enable the Exchange to
cover its costs for providing an enhanced version of its front-end
trading system to sponsored customers.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3) of the Act \6\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \7\ thereunder. At any
time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \7\ 17 CFR 19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2009-71 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2009-71. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-ISE-2009-71 and should be
submitted on or before October 29, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-24268 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P