[Federal Register: October 16, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 201)]
[Notices]
[Page 61441-61442]
[DOCID:fr16oc08-89]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2007-0042]

Canadian Standards Association; Reinstated Recognition for
Product Test Standard

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Reinstating recognition for product test standard.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration's continued recognition of the Canadian Standards
Association for a test standard.

DATES: Recognition for the reinstated standard is effective July 3,
2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MaryAnn Garrahan, Director, Office of
Technical Programs and Coordination Activities, NRTL Program,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N-3655, Washington, DC 20210,
or phone<PHONE_NUMBER>. Our Web page includes information about the
NRTL Program

(see http://www.osha.gov and select ``N'' in the site index).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice of Correction

    The Canadian Standards Association (CSA) was recognized by OSHA as
a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory on December 24, 1992 (57 FR
61452). The notice which announced this recognition included a list of
test standards that became part of CSA's scope of recognition. In
general, NRTLs use such test standards to test and certify products
that OSHA requires to be approved before use in the workplace. One of
the test standards included in CSA's initial scope was UL 1563, which
is now titled Electric Spas, Equipment Assemblies, and Associated
Equipment. At the time, its title was Electric Hot Tubs, Spas, and
Associated Equipment. In compliance with its regulations, OSHA renewed
CSA's recognition on July 3, 2001 (66 FR 35271). OSHA, however,
inadvertently omitted UL 1563 from the Federal Register notice
published for the CSA renewal. As a result, OSHA is reinstating UL 1563
to CSA's scope of recognition. CSA's capability to test and certify
products to this standard has existed since the time of its recognition
in December 1992.
    This reinstatement is the only change that OSHA is making to CSA's
recognition through this notice. All other terms and conditions of its
recognition remain the same.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of October 2008.
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E8-24566 Filed 10-15-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24403-24405]
[FR Doc No: 2018-11327]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2017-1144; Airspace Docket No. 16-AGL-30]
RIN 2120-AA66

Modification of Air Traffic Service (ATS) Routes in the Vicinity
of Richmond, IN

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action modifies five VHF Omnidirectional Range (VOR)
Federal airways (V-12, V-214, V-340, V-467, and V-517) and one low
altitude area navigation (RNAV) route (T-213) in the vicinity of
Richmond, IN. The FAA is taking this action due to the planned
decommissioning of the Richmond, IN, VHF Omnidirectional Range/Tactical
Air Navigation (VORTAC) navigation aid (NAVAID) which provides
navigation guidance for portions of the affected ATS routes. Overall,
this action enhances the safety and management of aircraft within the
National Airspace System (NAS).

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, September 13, 2018. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
Title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11B at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy Group,
Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it modifies the NAS route structure as necessary to
preserve the safe and efficient flow of air traffic.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register for Docket No. FAA-2017-1144 (83 FR 1582; January 12,
2018). The NPRM proposed to amend VOR Federal airways V-12, V-214, V-
340, V-467, and V-517, and RNAV route T-213, due to the planned
decommissioning of the Richmond, IN, VORTAC. Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written
comments on the proposal. One supportive comment was received.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017, and effective September 15,
2017. FAA Order 7400.11B is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11B lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

Differences From the NPRM

    In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to remove the V-517 airway segment
between the Cincinnati, OH, VORTAC and the Dayton, OH, VOR/Distance
Measuring Equipment (VOR/DME). That proposed amendment incorrectly
listed the state reference for the Cincinnati, KY, VORTAC as ``OH'' in
the proposed amendment and in the regulatory text for V-517. The
corrected V-517 amendment is to remove the airway segment between the
Cincinnati, KY, VORTAC and the Dayton, OH, VOR/DME and the V-517
regulatory text is to reflect the airway ending at the Cincinnati, KY,
VORTAC. This rule corrects the state reference for the Cincinnati, KY,
VORTAC.

The Rule

    The FAA is amending Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 to modify VOR Federal airways V-12, V-214, V-340, V-467, and V-
517, and low altitude RNAV route T-213. The planned decommissioning of
the Richmond, IN, VORTAC has made these actions necessary. The VOR
Federal airway and RNAV T-route changes are outlined below.
    V-12: V-12 extends between the Gaviota, CA, VORTAC and the
Pottstown, PA, VORTAC. This rule removes the airway segment between the
Shelbyville, IN, VOR/Distance Measuring Equipment (VOR/DME) and the
Allegheny, PA, VOR/DME. The unaffected portions of the existing airway
remain as charted.
    V-214: V-214 extends between the Kokomo, IN, VORTAC and the
Richmond, IN, VORTAC; and between the intersection of the Appleton, OH,
VORTAC 236[deg] and Zanesville, OH, VOR/DME 274[deg] radials (GLOOM
fix) and the Teterboro, NJ, VOR/DME. This rule removes the airway
segment between the Muncie, IN, VOR/DME and the Richmond, IN, VORTAC.
The unaffected portions of the existing airway remain as charted.
    V-340: V-340 extends between the intersection of the Peotone, IL,
VORTAC 053[deg] and Knox, IN, VOR/DME 297[deg] radials (BEARZ fix) and
the Richmond, IN, VORTAC. This rule removes the airway segment between
the Fort Wayne, IN, VORTAC and the Richmond, IN, VORTAC. The unaffected
portions of the existing airway remain as charted.
    V-467: V-467 extends between the Richmond, IN, VORTAC and the
Detroit, MI, VOR/DME. This rule removes the airway segment between the
Richmond, IN, VORTAC and the Waterville, OH, VOR/DME. The unaffected
portion of the existing airway remains as charted.
    V-517: V-517 extends between the Snowbird, TN, VORTAC and Dayton,
OH, VOR/DME. This rule removes the airway segment between the
Cincinnati, KY, VORTAC and the Dayton, OH, VOR/DME. The unaffected
portions of the existing airway remain as charted.
    T-213: T-213 extends between the Louisville, KY, VORTAC and
Richmond, IN, VORTAC. This rule removes the VOR portion of the
Richmond, IN, VORTAC from service

and retains the Richmond, IN, DME equipment, with the same three-letter
identifier, in service at the same location. Additionally, the VORTAC
and DME three-letter identifiers are added to the first line of the
RNAV route description. The existing RNAV route remains as charted.
    All radials in the route descriptions are unchanged and stated in
True degrees.
    VOR Federal airways are published in paragraph 6010(a), and United
States Area Navigation Routes (low altitude T-routes) are published in
paragraph 6011, of FAA Order 7400.11B dated August 3, 2017, and
effective September 15, 2017, which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR 71.1. The VOR Federal airways and RNAV T-route listed in this
document will be subsequently published in the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated,
does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action of modifying five VOR
Federal airways and one low altitude RNAV route qualifies for
categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act and
its implementing regulations at 40 CFR part 1500, and in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures,
Paragraph 5-6.5a, which categorically excludes from further
environmental impact review rulemaking actions that designate or modify
classes of airspace areas, airways, routes, and reporting points (see
14 CFR part 71, Designation of Class A, B, C, D, and E Airspace Areas;
Air Traffic Service Routes; and Reporting Points). As such, this action
is not expected to cause any potentially significant environmental
impacts. In accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, paragraph 5-2 regarding
Extraordinary Circumstances, the FAA has reviewed this action for
factors and circumstances in which a normally categorically excluded
action may have a significant environmental impact requiring further
analysis. The FAA determined that no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an environmental assessment or
environmental impact study.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11B,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017 and
effective September 15, 2017, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal Airways.

* * * * *

V-12 [Amended]

    From Gaviota, CA; San Marcus, CA; Palmdale, CA; 38 miles, 6
miles wide, Hector, CA; 12 miles, 38 miles, 85 MSL, 14 miles, 75
MSL, Needles, CA; 45 miles, 34 miles, 95 MSL, Drake, AZ; Winslow,
AZ; 30 miles, 85 MSL, Zuni, NM; Albuquerque, NM; Otto, NM; Anton
Chico, NM; Tucumcari, NM; Amarillo, TX; Mitbee, OK; Anthony, KS;
Wichita, KS; Emporia, KS; INT Emporia 063[deg] and Napoleon, MO,
243[deg] radials; Napoleon; INT Napoleon 095[deg] and Columbia, MO,
292[deg] radials; Columbia; Foristell, MO; Troy, IL; Bible Grove,
IL; to Shelbyville, IN. From Allegheny, PA; Johnstown, PA;
Harrisburg, PA; INT Harrisburg 092[deg] and Pottstown, PA, 278[deg]
radials; to Pottstown.
* * * * *

V-214 [Amended]

    From Kokomo IN, Marion, IN; to Muncie, IN. From INT Appleton,
OH, 236[deg] and Zanesville, OH, 274[deg] radials; Zanesville;
Bellaire, OH; INT Bellaire 107[deg] and Grantsville, MD, 285[deg]
radials; Grantsville; Martinsburg, WV; INT Martinsburg 094[deg] and
Baltimore, MD, 300[deg] radials; Baltimore; INT Baltimore 093[deg]
and Dupont, DE, 223[deg] radials; Dupont; Yardley, PA; to Teterboro,
NJ.
* * * * *

V-340 [Amended]

    From INT Peotone, IL, 053[deg] and Knox, IN, 297[deg] radials;
Knox; to Fort Wayne, IN.
* * * * *

V-467 [Amended]

    From Waterville, OH; to Detroit, MI.
* * * * *

V-517 [Amended]

    From Snowbird, TN; INT Snowbird 329[deg] and London, KY,
141[deg] radials; London; INT London 004[deg] and Falmouth, KY,
164[deg] radials; Falmouth; to Cincinnati, KY.
* * * * *

Paragraph 6011 United States Area Navigation Routes

* * * * *

T-213 Louisville, KY (IIU) to Richmond, IN (RID) [Amended]

Louisville, KY (IIU)    VORTAC                 (Lat. 38[deg]06'13'' N, long. 85[deg]34'39'' W)
GAMKE, IN               WP                     (Lat. 38[deg]46'13'' N, long. 85[deg]14'35'' W)
MILAN, IN               FIX                    (Lat. 39[deg]21'22'' N, long. 85[deg]19'01'' W)
Richmond, IN (RID)      DME                    (Lat. 39[deg]45'18'' N, long. 84[deg]50'20'' W)

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 21, 2018.
Rodger A. Dean Jr.,
Manager, Airspace Policy Group.
[FR Doc. 2018-11327 Filed 5-25-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 21, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29648-29651]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12033]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2012-0394]
RIN 1625-AA11

Regulated Navigation Area; Waldo-Hancock Bridge Demolition,
Penobscot River, Between Prospect and Verona, ME

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Coast Guard is establishing a regulated
navigation area (RNA) on the navigable waters of the Penobscot River
between Prospect and Verona, ME, under and surrounding the Waldo-
Hancock Bridge in order to facilitate the removal of the trusses,
cables, and towers of the Waldo-Hancock Bridge. This temporary final
rule (TFR) is necessary to provide for the safety of life on the
navigable waters during bridge demolition operations which include hot
work and heavy lift operations. This rule implements certain safety
measures, including speed restrictions and the temporary suspension of
vessel traffic, during

demolition operations that could be hazardous to nearby vessels.

DATES: This rule is effective with actual notice on May 10, 2013
through April 30, 2014. This rule is effective in the CFR on May 21,
2013 through April 30, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2012-0394]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email Ensign Elizabeth V. Morris, Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard Sector Northern New England, telephone
207-767-0398, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or BMC Craig D.
Lapiejko, First Coast Guard District, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
TFR Temporary Final Rule

A. Regulatory History and Information

    On July 16, 2012 the Coast Guard provided the public with prior
notice and opportunity to comment when it published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) entitled Regulated Navigation Area; Original
Waldo-Hancock Bridge Removal, Penobscot River, Bucksport, ME, in the
Federal Register (77 FR 41717). No comments were received. This TFR is
the outgrowth of that NPRM. As compared to the NPRM, Coast Guard seeks
only to adjust the dates of the originally proposed RNA so as to
account for the delay in demolition efforts as reported by The Maine
Department of Transportation. This adjustment does not substantially
change the intent of the RNA and does not necessitate a new comment
period. In addition, the Coast Guard has determined there is a public
safety need to enforce this regulation during the demolition
activities, which may begin fewer than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. For this reason, the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for making this rule effective fewer than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).

B. Basis and Purpose

    Under the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, the Coast Guard has the
authority to establish RNAs in defined water areas that are determined
to have hazardous conditions and in which vessel traffic can be
regulated in the interest of safety. See 33 U.S.C. 1231 and Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
    The purpose of this proposed rule is to ensure the safe transit of
vessels in the area, and to protect all persons, vessels, and the
marine environment during demolition operations of the original Waldo-
Hancock Bridge.

C. Discussion of the Final Rule

    The removal of the Waldo-Hancock Bridge involves large machinery
and construction vessel operations above and in the navigable waters of
the Penobscot River. The ongoing operations are, by their nature,
hazardous and pose risks both to recreational and commercial traffic as
well as to the construction crew. In order to mitigate the inherent
risks involved with the removal of a bridge, it is necessary to control
vessel movement through the area. The purpose of this TFR is to ensure
the safety of waterway users, the public, and construction workers for
the duration of the Waldo-Hancock Bridge demolition. Heavy-lift
operations are sensitive to water movement, and wake from passing
vessels could pose significant risk of injury or death to construction
workers.
    In order to minimize such unexpected or uncontrolled movement of
water, the RNA limits vessel speed and wake of all vessels operating in
the vicinity of the bridge removal zone. A five knot speed limit and
``NO WAKE'' zone will be enforced in the vicinity of the Waldo-Hancock
Bridge demolition and will allow for the Captain of the Port (COTP) to
suspend all vessel traffic for emergent situations that pose imminent
threat to waterway users in the area. The RNA will also protect vessels
desiring to transit the area by ensuring that vessels are only
permitted to transit when it is safe to do so.
    The Coast Guard may close the regulated area described in this rule
to all vessel traffic during circumstances that pose an imminent threat
to waterway users operating in the area. Complete waterway closures
will be made with as much advanced notice as possible. Please note that
specific closure dates and times will be posted in the Local Notice to
Mariners and disseminated via a Safety Marine Information Broadcast
during each closure.
    The COTP Sector Northern New England will cause notice of
enforcement, suspension of enforcement, or closure of this RNA to be
made by appropriate means to ensure the widest distribution among the
affected segments of the public. Such means of notification may
include, but are not limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners and Local
Notice to Mariners. In addition, the COTP maintains a telephone line
that is staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The public can
obtain information concerning enforcement of the regulated navigation
area by contacting Coast Guard Sector Northern New England Command
Center at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This TFR is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    We expect the economic impact of this rule to be minimal because
this regulated navigation area only requires vessels to reduce speed
through a limited portion of the Penobscot River, therefore causing
only a minimal delay to a vessel's transit. In addition, periods when
the RNA is closed to all traffic are expected to be of limited number
and duration, and we will give advance notice of such closures.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended,

requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received zero comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    (1) This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit, fish, or anchor in the vicinity of the Waldo-Hancock Bridge.
    (2) The rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: periods
when the RNA is closed to all traffic are expected to be during seasons
of low traffic volume, also, vessels will be required to reduce speed
through a limited portion of the Penobscot River, and, therefore, will
only be caused a minimal delay. Notifications will include, but are not
limited to, the Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to
Mariners to inform the public before, during, and at the conclusion of
any RNA enforcement period.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and find that this
action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves the establishment of an RNA and we have determined that
this action will not result in significant environmental impacts.
Therefore, it is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and the
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
    We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery
of a significant environmental impact from this final rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR Part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:

     Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 50 U.S.C.
191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107-295,
116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T01-0394 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T01-0394  Regulated Navigation Area; Waldo-Hancock Bridge
Demolition, Penobscot River, between Prospect and Verona, ME.

    (a) Location. The following area is a Regulated Navigation Area
(RNA): All navigable waters of Penobscot River between Prospect, ME and
Verona, ME, from surface to bottom, within a 300 yard radius of
position 44[deg]33'38'' N, 068[deg]48'05'' W.
    (b) Regulations.
    (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.10, 165.11, and
165.13 apply within the RNA.
    (2) In accordance with the general regulations, entry into or
movement within this zone, during periods of enforcement, is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Sector Northern New
England.
    (3) Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the RNA
during periods of enforcement by contacting the COTP or the COTP's on-
scene representative on VHF-16 or via phone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) During periods of enforcement, a speed limit of five knots will
be in effect within the regulated area and all vessels must proceed
through the area with caution and operate in such a manner as to
produce no wake.
    (5) During periods of enforcement, vessels must comply with all
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's on-scene
representative. The ``on-scene representative'' of the COTP is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the COTP to act on the COTP's behalf. The on-scene
representative may be on a Coast Guard vessel; Maine State Police,
Maine Marine Patrol or other designated craft; or may be ashore and
communicating with vessels via VHF-FM radio or loudhailer. Members of
the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to inform vessel operators of
this regulation.
    (6) During periods of enforcement, upon being hailed by a U.S.
Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing light or other means, the
operator of the vessel must proceed as directed.
    (7) All other relevant regulations, including but not limited to
the Rules of the Road (33 CFR part 84--subchapter E, Inland
Navigational Rules) remain in effect within the regulated area and must
be strictly followed at all times.
    (c) Enforcement Period. This regulation is enforceable 24 hours a
day with actual notice from May 10, 2013 through April 30, 2014, and
enforceable based on constructive notice from May 21, 2013 through
April 30, 2014.
    (1) Prior to commencing or suspending enforcement of this
regulation, the COTP and designated on-scene patrol personnel will
notify the public whenever the regulation is being enforced and
whenever enforcement is lifted, to include dates and times. The means
of notification will include, but are not limited to, Broadcast Notice
to Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners, Marine Safety Information
Bulletins, or other appropriate means.
    (2) Violations of this RNA may be reported to the COTP at 207-767-
0303 or on VHF-Channel 16.

    Dated: May 10, 2013.
V.B. Gifford,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013-12033 Filed 5-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P