[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 5, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47440-47442]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17106]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 33960]

Notice of Applications for Deregistration under Section 8(f) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940

July 31, 2020.
    The following is a notice of applications for deregistration under
section 8(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for the month of
July 2020. A copy of each application may be obtained via the
Commission's website by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. An order granting each
application will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested
persons may request a hearing on any application by emailing the SEC's
Secretary at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and serving the relevant
applicant with a copy of the request by email, if an email address is
listed for the relevant applicant below, or personally or by mail, if a
physical address is listed for the relevant applicant below. Hearing
requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on August 25, 2020,
and should be accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in the
form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Pursuant to Rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the
desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason for the request,
and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing
may request notification by writing to the Commission's Secretary at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
ADDRESSES: The Commission<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shawn Davis, Assistant Director, at
(202) 551-6413 or Chief Counsel's Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>; SEC,
Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office, 100 F Street
NE, Washington, DC 20549-8010.

AGL Separate Account A [File No. 811-01491]

    Summary: Applicant, a unit investment trust, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. The applicant
has transferred its assets to AGL Separate Account D. Expenses of less
than $10,000 incurred in connection with the reorganization were paid
by American General Life Insurance Company.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on December 19, 2019, and
amended on June 26, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
AG Separate Account A of AGL [File No. 811-08862]

    Summary: Applicant, a unit investment trust, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. The applicant
has transferred its assets to AGL Separate Account D. Expenses of less
than $10,000 incurred in connection with the reorganization were paid
by American General Life Insurance Company.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on December 19, 2019, and
amended on June 26, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
AGL Separate Account VA-1 [File No. 811-07781]

    Summary: Applicant, a unit investment trust, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. The applicant
has transferred its assets to AGL Separate Account D. Expenses of less
than $10,000 incurred in connection with the reorganization were paid
by American General Life Insurance Company.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on December 19, 2019, and
amended on June 26, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
AGL Separate Account VA-2 [File No. 811-01990]

    Summary: Applicant, a unit investment trust, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. The applicant
has transferred its assets to AGL Separate Account D. Expenses of less
than $10,000 incurred in connection with the reorganization were paid
by American General Life Insurance Company.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on December 19, 2019, and
amended on June 26, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
AGL Separate Account VUL [File No. 811-05794]

    Summary: Applicant, a unit investment trust, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. The applicant
has transferred its assets to AGL Separate Account VL-R. Expenses of
less than $10,000 incurred in connection with the reorganization were
paid by American General Life Insurance Company.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on December 19, 2019, and
amended on June 26, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
AGL Separate Account VUL-2 [File No. 811-06366]

    Summary: Applicant, a unit investment trust, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. The applicant
has transferred its assets to AGL Separate Account VL-R. Expenses of
less than $10,000 incurred in connection with the reorganization were
paid by American General Life Insurance Company.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on December 19, 2019, and
amended on June 26, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Blackstone Alternative Alpha Fund [File No. 811-22634]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On May 28,
2020, applicant made liquidating distributions to its shareholders
based on net asset value. Expenses of $70,017 incurred in connection
with the liquidation were paid by the applicant.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on June 11, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Blackstone Alternative Alpha Fund II [File No. 811-22792]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On May 28,
2020, applicant made liquidating distributions to its shareholders
based on net asset value. Expenses of $53,258 incurred in connection
with the liquidation were paid by the applicant.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on June 11, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

Blackstone Alternative Alpha Master Fund [File No. 811-22635]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On May 28,
2020, applicant made liquidating distributions to its shareholders
based on net asset value. Expenses of $536,956 incurred in connection
with the liquidation were paid by the applicant. Applicant also has
retained $8,898,918 for the purpose of paying certain outstanding
liabilities.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on June 11, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Global Governments Variable Account [File No. 811-05450]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. The applicant has transferred its assets to
MFS Global Governments Portfolio, a series of MFS Variable Insurance
Trust II and on December 2, 2011, made a final distribution to its
shareholders based on net asset value. Expenses of $37,479.43 incurred
in connection with the reorganization were paid by the applicant's
investment adviser.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on October 17, 2019, and
amended on March 10, 2020 and June 23, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Government Securities Variable Account/MA/[File No. 811-04009]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. The applicant has transferred its assets to
MFS Global Government Securities Portfolio, a series of MFS Variable
Insurance Trust II and on December 2, 2011, made a final distribution
to its shareholders based on net asset value. Expenses of $43,194.90
incurred in connection with the reorganization were paid by the
applicant's investment adviser.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on October 17, 2019, and
amended on March 10, 2020 and June 23, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Hartford Funds Master Fund [File No. 811-23232]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On October 4, 2019, applicant made a
liquidating distribution to its shareholders based on net asset value.
Expenses of $22,652.74 incurred in connection with the liquidation were
paid by the applicant's investment adviser.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on May 15, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
High Yield Variable Account/MA [File No. 811-03562]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. The applicant has transferred its assets to
MFS High Yield Portfolio, a series of MFS Variable Insurance Trust II
and on December 2, 2011, made a final distribution to its shareholders
based on net asset value. Expenses of $40,400.34 incurred in connection
with the reorganization were paid by the applicant's investment
adviser.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on October 17, 2019, and
amended on March 10, 2020 and June 23, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Oppenheimer ETF Trust [File No. 811-21993]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. The applicant has transferred its assets to
Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II and Invesco Exchange-Traded Self-
Indexed Fund Trust, and, on May 24, 2019, made a final distribution to
its shareholders based on net asset value. Expenses of $1,300,306.94
incurred in connection with the reorganization were paid by the
applicant's investment adviser and the acquiring fund's investment
adviser, and/or their affiliates.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on May 4, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Oppenheimer Global Opportunities Fund [File No. 811-06001]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. The applicant has transferred its assets to
AIM International Mutual Funds (Invesco International Mutual Funds),
and on May 24, 2019, made a final distribution to its shareholders
based on net asset value. Expenses of $1,300,306.94 incurred in
connection with the reorganization were paid by the applicant's
investment adviser and the acquiring fund's investment adviser, and/or
their affiliates.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on May 4, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Fund [File No. 811-05724]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. The applicant has transferred its assets to
AIM Investment Funds (Invesco Investment Funds), and, on May 24, 2019,
made a final distribution to its shareholders based on net asset value.
Expenses of $1,300,306.94 incurred in connection with the
reorganization were paid by the applicant's investment adviser and the
acquiring fund's investment adviser, and/or their affiliates.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on May 4, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Oppenheimer Quest For Value Funds [File No. 811-05225]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. The applicant has transferred its assets to
AIM Investment Funds (Invesco Investment Funds) and AIM Growth Series
(Invesco Growth Series), and, on May 24, 2019, made a final
distribution to its shareholders based on net asset value. Expenses of
$1,300,306.94 incurred in connection with the reorganization were paid
by the applicant's investment adviser and the acquiring fund's
investment adviser, and/or their affiliates.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on May 4, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Separate Account II of AGL [File No. 811-04867]

    Summary: Applicant, a unit investment trust, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. The applicant
has transferred its assets to AGL Separate Account VL-R. Expenses of
less than $10,000 incurred in connection with the reorganization were
paid by American General Life Insurance Company.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on December 19, 2019, and
amended on June 26, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Total Return Variable Account [File No. 811-05448]

    Summary: Applicant, seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. The applicant has transferred its assets to
MFS Total Return Portfolio, a series of MFS Variable Insurance Trust II
and on December 2, 2011, made a final distribution to its shareholders
based on net asset value. Expenses of $51,512.77 incurred in connection
with the reorganization were paid by the applicant's investment
adviser.

    Filing Dates: The application was filed on October 17, 2019, and
amended on March 10, 2020 and June 23, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
USL Separate Account USL B [File No. 811-04865-01]

    Summary: Applicant, a unit investment trust, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. The applicant
has transferred its assets to USL Separate Account USL VL-R. Expenses
of less than $10,000 incurred in connection with the reorganization
were paid by The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of
New York.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on December 19, 2019, and
amended on June 26, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
USL Separate Account USL VA-R [File No. 811-09007]

    Summary: Applicant, a unit investment trust, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. The applicant
has transferred its assets to USL Separate Account USL A. Expenses of
less than $10,000 incurred in connection with the reorganization were
paid by The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New
York.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on December 19, 2019, and
amended on June 26, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Variable Annuity Account One of First SunAmerica Life Insurance Company
[File No. 811-06313]

    Summary: Applicant, a unit investment trust, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. The applicant
has transferred its assets to FS Variable Separate Account. Expenses of
less than $10,000 incurred in connection with the reorganization were
paid by The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New
York.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on December 19, 2019, and
amended on June 26, 2020.
    Applicant's Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-17106 Filed 8-4-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 193 (Tuesday, October 6, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60314-60318]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25337]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2013-0388; FRL-9935-08-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas;
Infrastructure and Interstate Transport State Implementation Plan for
the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve elements of a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from the State of Texas for the
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS). The submittal addresses how the existing SIP provides for
implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the 2010 SO2
NAAQS (infrastructure SIP or i-SIP). This i-SIP ensures that the
State's SIP is adequate to meet the state's responsibilities under the
CAA.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 5, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R06-OAR-2013-0388, by one of the following methods:
     www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions.
     Email: Nevine Salem at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Mail or delivery: Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning
Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Deliveries are accepted only
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays, and not on legal
holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2013-0338. The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change, and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit electronically any
information that you consider to be CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. The www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means the EPA will not know
your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body
of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to the EPA
without going through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with
any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If the EPA cannot read your comment due
to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, the
EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should
avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be
free of any defects or viruses. Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and should include discussion of all
points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments
or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on
the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional
information on submitting comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region 6,
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available at either location (e.g., CBI).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Nevine Salem,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>To inspect the hard copy materials, please
schedule an appointment with her or Bill Deese at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.

I. Background

    On June 22, 2010, the EPA revised the primary SO2 NAAQS
(hereafter the 2010 SO2 NAAQS) to establish a new 1-hour
standard, with a level of 75 parts per billion, based on the 3-year
average of the annual 99th percentile of 1-hour

daily maximum concentrations (75 FR 35520). Each state must submit the
i-SIP within three years after the promulgation of a new or revised
NAAQS. Section 110(a)(2) of the CAA includes a list of specific
elements the i-SIP must meet.
    On April 23, 2013, the TCEQ submitted an i-SIP for the 2010
SO2 NAAQS. On September 13, 2013, the EPA issued guidance
addressing the i-SIP elements for all NAAQS.\1\ This guidance doesn't
address CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), which concerns interstate
pollution transport affecting attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP)
Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2),
Memorandum from Stephen D. Page, September 13, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EPA is proposing approval of the April 23, 2013 submission for
the applicable requirements of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. The EPA
is not proposing any action at this time regarding the interstate
transport provisions portions of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) pertaining
to nonattainment or interference with maintenance of the NAAQS in other
States and the portion of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) regarding visibility
protection. We intend to take action as to whether the Texas SIP meets
the requirements of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) in a later action. In a separate
action, we proposed to disapprove the portion of the Texas
SO2 i-SIP for CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) pertaining to
the visibility protection (79 FR 74818, December 16, 2014). The EPA
will take final action on the portion of CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) pertaining to visibility protection of the Texas
SO2 i-SIP in a future rulemaking. EPA notes that the Agency
is not approving any specific rule, but rather proposing that Texas'
already approved SIP meets certain CAA requirements.

II. The EPA's Evaluation of Texas' 2010 SO2 NAAQS i-SIP
Submittal

    Below is a summary of the EPA's evaluation of the Texas i-SIP for
each applicable element of CAA section 110(a)(2) A-M.\2\ Texas provided
a demonstration of how the existing Texas i-SIP met all the
requirements of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS on May 09, 2013. This SIP
submission became complete by operation of law on November 09, 2013.
See CAA section 110(k)(1)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Additional information on: The history of SO2,
its levels, forms and, determination of compliance; the EPA's
approach for reviewing i-SIPs; the details of the SIP submittal and
the EPA's evaluation; the effect of recent court decisions on i-
SIPs; the statute and regulatory citations in the Texas SIP specific
to this review; the specific i-SIP applicable CAA and the EPA
regulatory citations; Federal Register Notice citations for Texas'
SIP approvals; Texas minor New Source Review program and the EPA
approval activities; and Texas' Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) program can be found in the Technical Support
Document (TSD). The TSD can be accessed through www.regulations.gov
(e-docket EPA-R06-2013-0388).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (A) Emission limits and other control measures: The CAA Sec.
110(a)(2)(A) requires SIPs to include enforceable emission limitations
and other control measures, means or techniques (including economic
incentives such as fees, marketable permits, and auctions of emissions
rights), as well as schedules and timetables for compliance, as may be
necessary or appropriate to meet the applicable requirements of this
Act and other related matters as needed to implement, maintain and
enforce each of the NAAQS.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The specific nonattainment area plan requirements of section
110(a)(2)(I) are subject to the timing requirements of section 172,
not the timing requirement of section 110(a)(1). Thus, section
110(a)(2)(A) does not require that states submit regulations or
emissions limits specifically for attaining the 2010 SO2
NAAQS. Those SIP provisions are due as part of each state's
attainment plan, and will be addressed separately from the
requirements of section 110(a)(2)(A). In the context of an
infrastructure SIP, the EPA is not evaluating the existing SIP
provisions for this purpose. Instead, the EPA is only evaluating
whether the state's SIP has basic structural provisions for the
implementation of the NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Texas Clean Air Act (TCAA) provides the Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality (TCEQ), its Chairman, and its Executive Director
with broad legal authority. They can adopt emission standards and
compliance schedules applicable to regulated entities; emission
standards and limitations and any other measures necessary for
attainment and maintenance of national standards; and, enforce
applicable laws, regulations, standards and compliance schedules, and
seek injunctive relief. This authority has been employed in the past to
adopt and submit multiple revisions to the Texas State Implementation
Plan. The approved SIP for Texas that satisfies the infrastructure
requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2) for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS
is documented at 40 CFR part 52.2270, Subpart SS. TCEQ's air quality
rules and standards are codified at Title 30, Part 1 of the Texas
Administrative Code (TAC). Numerous parts of the regulations codified
into 30 TAC necessary for implementing and enforcing the NAAQS have
been adopted into the SIP.
    (B) Ambient air quality monitoring/data system: The SIP must
provide for establishment and implementation of ambient air quality
monitors, collection and analysis of monitoring data, and providing
such data to the EPA upon request.
    The TCAA provides the authority allowing the TCEQ to collect air
monitoring data, quality-assure the results, and report the data. TCEQ
maintains and operates a monitoring network to measure ambient levels
of SO2 and submits an annual Network Assessment to the EPA
with monitoring requirements. TCEQ's 2014 Air Monitoring Network Plan
is the most recent EPA-approved plan and was approved by the EPA on
January 14, 2015.\4\ All monitoring data is measured using the EPA
approved methods and subject to the EPA quality assurance requirements.
Federally required monitoring is conducted under an EPA-approved
Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP). The TCEQ Web site provides the
monitor locations and posts past and current concentrations of criteria
pollutants measured in the State's network of monitors.\5\ TCEQ submits
all required data to the EPA, following the EPA regulations. Previously
the Texas statewide monitoring network was approved into the SIP on
March 7, 1978 (43 FR 9275).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ A copy of TCEQ's ambient monitoring network assessment and
EPA's approval letter are included in the docket for this proposed
rulemaking.
    \5\ See http://www.tceq.texas.gov/airquality/monops/sites/mon_sites.html and http://www17.tceq.texas.gov/tamis/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.welcome.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (C) Program for enforcement: The CAA Sec.  110(a)(2)(C) requires
SIPs to include the following three elements: (1) A program providing
for enforcement of the measures in paragraph A above; (2) a program for
the regulation of the modification and construction of stationary
sources as necessary to protect the applicable NAAQS (i.e., state-wide
permitting of minor sources); and (3) a permit program to meet the
major source permitting requirements of the CAA (for areas designated
as attainment or unclassifiable for the NAAQS).\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ As discussed in further details in the TSD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (1) Enforcement of SIP Measures. As noted in (A), the TCAA provides
authority for the TCEQ, its Chairman, and its Executive Director to
enforce the requirements any regulations, permits or final compliance
orders as well as general enforcement powers. Among other things, they
can file lawsuits to compel compliance with the statutes and
regulations; commence civil actions, issue field citation; conduct
investigations of regulated entities; collect criminal and civil
penalties; develop and enforce rules and standards related to
protection of air quality; issue

compliance orders; pursue criminal prosecutions; investigate, enter
into remediation agreements; and issue emergency cease and desist
orders. The TCAA also provides additional enforcement authorities and
funding mechanisms.
    (2) Minor New Source Review (NSR). Section 110(a)(2)(C) also
requires that the SIP include measures to regulate construction and
modification of stationary sources to protect the NAAQS. The Texas
minor NSR permitting requirements are approved as part of the SIP.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The EPA is not proposing to approve or disapprove the
existing Texas minor NSR program to the extent that it may be
inconsistent with the EPA's regulations governing this program. The
EPA has maintained that the CAA does not require that new
infrastructure SIP submissions correct any defects in existing EPA-
approved provisions of minor NSR programs in order for the EPA to
approve the infrastructure SIP for element C (e.g., 76 FR 41076-
41079). The EPA believes that a number of states may have minor NSR
provisions that are contrary to the existing EPA regulations for
this program. The statutory requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C)
provide for considerable flexibility in designing minor NSR
programs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (3) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit program.
Texas's PSD portion of the SIP covers all NSR regulated pollutants as
well as the requirements for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS and has been
approved by the EPA.\8\ Texas has a SIP-approved PSD and nonattainment
NSR permitting program that contains requirement for sources of air
pollutants to obtain an approved permit before beginning construction
of a facility and before modifying an existing facility (79 FR 66626,
November 10, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ As discussed further in the TSD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (D) Interstate and international transport: The requirements for
the interstate transport of SO2 emissions are that the SIP
contain adequate provisions prohibiting emissions to other states which
will (1) contribute significantly to nonattainment of the NAAQS, (2)
interfere with maintenance of the NAAQS, (3) interfere with measures
required to prevent significant deterioration or (4) interfere with
measures to protect visibility (CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)). In addition,
States must comply with requirements to prevent transport of
international air pollution (CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii)).
    The Texas i-SIP submittal discussed the requirements of the CAA
section 110(a)(D). We plan to evaluate and take action on the portion
of the i-SIP pertaining to emissions which will contribute
significantly to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the
NAAQS at a later time. As noted above, we proposed to disapprove the
portion of the SIP addressing interstate transport and visibility
protection in an earlier action (80 FR 74818, December 16, 2014).
    Because Texas has a fully approved Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) SIP addressing all regulated new source review
pollutants, we propose to approve the transport portion of the
submittal. Revisions to the PSD SIP were approved on November 10, 2014
(79 FR 66626).
    CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) requires that the SIP contain adequate
provisions insuring compliance with the applicable requirements of
section 126 (relating to interstate pollution abatement) and 115
(relating to international pollution abatement). Texas meets the
section 126 requirements as it has a fully approved PSD SIP and no
source or sources have been identified by the EPA as having any
interstate impacts under section 126 in any pending action related to
any air pollutant. Texas meets the section 115 requirements as there
are no final findings by the EPA that Texas air emissions affect other
countries. Therefore, we propose to approve the portion of the Texas
SO2 i-SIP pertaining to CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii).
    (E) Adequate authority, resources, implementation, and oversight:
The SIP must provide for the following: (1) Necessary assurances that
the state (and other entities within the state responsible for
implementing the SIP) will have adequate personnel, funding, and
authority under state or local law to implement the SIP, and that there
are no legal impediments to such implementation; (2) requirements
relating to state boards; and (3) necessary assurances that the state
has responsibility for ensuring adequate implementation of any plan
provision for which it relies on local governments or other entities to
carry out that portion of the plan.
    Both elements (A) and (E) herein address the requirement that there
is adequate authority to implement and enforce the SIP and that there
are no legal impediments.
    This i-SIP submission for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS describes
the SIP regulations governing the various functions of personnel within
the TCEQ, including the administrative, technical support, planning,
enforcement, and permitting functions of the program.
    With respect to funding, TCAA requires TCEQ establish an emissions
fee schedule for sources in order to fund the reasonable costs of
administering various air pollution control programs and authorizes
TCEQ to collect additional fees necessary to cover reasonable costs
associated with processing of air permit applications. The EPA conducts
periodic program reviews to ensure that the state has adequate
resources and funding to among other things implement and enforce the
SIP.
    As required by the CAA, the SIP stipulates that any board or body,
which approves permits or enforcement orders, must have at least a
majority of members who represent the public interest and do not derive
any ``significant portion'' of their income from persons subject to
permits and enforcement orders or who appear before the board on issues
related to the CAA. The members of the board or body, or the head of an
agency with similar powers, are required to adequately disclose any
potential conflicts of interest.
    With respect to assurances that the States has responsibility to
implement the SIP adequately when it authorizes local or other agencies
to carry out portions of the plan, the Texas statutes and the SIP
designate the TCEQ as the primary air pollution control agency, and the
TCEQ maintains authority to ensure implementation of any applicable
plan portion.
    (F) Stationary source monitoring system: The SIP must provide the
establishment of a system to monitor emissions from stationary sources
and to submit periodic emission reports. It must require the
installation, maintenance, and replacement of equipment, and the
implementation of other necessary steps, by owners or operators of
stationary sources, to monitor emissions from sources. The SIP shall
also require periodic reports on the nature and amounts of emissions
and emissions-related data from sources, and require that the state
correlate the source reports with emission limitations or standards
established under the CAA. These reports must be made available for
public inspection at reasonable times.
    The TCAA authorizes the TCEQ to require persons engaged in
operations which result in air pollution to monitor or test emissions
and to file reports containing information relating to the nature and
amount of emissions. There also are SIP regulations pertaining to
sampling and testing and requirements for reporting of emissions
inventories. In addition, SIP rules establish general requirements for
maintaining records and reporting emissions.
    The TCEQ uses this information, in addition to information obtained
from other sources, to track progress towards maintaining the NAAQS,
developing control and maintenance strategies, identifying sources and
general

emission levels, and determine compliance with SIP regulations and
additional EPA requirements. The SIP requires this information be made
available to the public. Provisions concerning the handling of
confidential data and proprietary business information are included in
the SIP's regulations. These rules specifically exclude from
confidential treatment any records concerning the nature and amount of
emissions reported by sources.
    (G) Emergency authority: The SIP must provide for authority to
address activities causing imminent and substantial endangerment to
public health or welfare or the environment and to include contingency
plans to implement such authorities as necessary.
    The TCAA provides TCEQ with authority to address environmental
emergencies, and TCEQ has contingency plans to implement emergency
episode provisions. Upon a finding that any owner/operator is
unreasonably affecting the public health, safety or welfare, or the
health of animal or plant life, or property, TCAA authorizes TCEQ to,
after a reasonable attempt to give notice, declare a state of emergency
and issue without hearing an emergency special order directing the
owner/operator to cease such pollution immediately. The TCEQ may issue
emergency orders, or issue or suspend air permits as required by an air
pollution emergency.
    (H) Future SIP revisions: States must have the authority to revise
their SIPs in response to changes in the NAAQS, availability of
improved methods for attaining the NAAQS, or in response to an EPA
finding that the SIP is substantially inadequate to attain the NAAQS.
    The TCAA authorizes the TCEQ to revise its SIP, as necessary, to
account for revisions of an existing NAAQS, establishment of a new
NAAQS, to attain and maintain the NAAQS, to abate air pollution, to
adopt more effective methods of attaining the NAAQS, and to respond to
the EPA SIP calls concerning NAAQS adoption or implementation. TCEQ
regularly revises the Texas SIP in response to revisions of the NAAQS
and the EPA rules.
    (I) Nonattainment areas: The CAA section 110(a)(2)(I) requires that
in the case of a plan or plan revision for areas designated as
nonattainment areas, states must meet applicable requirements of Part D
of the CAA, relating to SIP requirements for designated nonattainment
area. SIP revisions that implement the control strategies necessary to
bring a nonattainment area into attainment of the NAAQSs are not
required by CAA to be submitted within three years of the promulgation
of a new or revised NAAQS. Therefore, Sec.  110(a)(1) does not require
this element to be demonstrated as part of an infrastructure SIP
submittal (73 FR 16025, at 16206).
    (J) Consultation with government officials, public notification,
PSD and visibility protection: The SIP must meet applicable
requirements of section 121: (1) Relating to interagency consultation
regarding certain CAA requirements; section 127 (2) relating to public
notification of NAAQS exceedances and related issues; and, part C
relating to (3) prevention of significant deterioration of air quality
and visibility protection.
    (1) Interagency consultation: As required by the TCAA, there must
be a public hearing before the adoption of any regulations or emission
control requirements and all interested persons are given a reasonable
opportunity to submit data, view, or arguments orally or in writing and
to examine witnesses testifying at the hearing. The TCEQ has
established public processes for all SIP revisions and permitting
programs. The TCEQ consults with other agencies, local agencies, and
governmental organizations, as well as with the environmental agencies
of other states regarding air quality concerns.
    (2) Public Notification: This i-SIP submission from Texas provides
the SIP regulatory citations requiring the TCEQ to regularly notify the
public of instances or areas in which any NAAQS are exceeded. Included
in the SIP are the rules for TCEQ to advise the public of the health
hazard associated with such exceedances; and enhance public awareness
of measures that can prevent such exceedances and of ways in which the
public can participate in the regulatory and other efforts to improve
air quality. In addition, as discussed for infrastructure element B
above, the TCEQ air monitoring Web site provides quality data for each
of the monitoring stations in Texas; this data is provided
instantaneously for certain pollutants, such as ozone. The Web site
also provides information on the health effects of lead, ozone,
particulate matter, and other criteria pollutants.
    (3) PSD and Visibility Protection: All major sources in Texas are
subject to Texas' SIP-approved PSD program. The PSD requirements here
are the same as those addressed under (C). Texas submitted a SIP
revision to address Regional Haze, including a long-term strategy to
address visibility impairment for each Class I area that may be
impacted by emission from Texas facilities. Texas SIP requirements
relating to visibility and regional haze are not affected when the EPA
establishes or revises a NAAQS. Therefore, the EPA believes that there
are no new visibility protection requirements due to the revision of
the NAAQS, and consequently there are no newly applicable visibility
protection obligations pursuant to infrastructure element (J) after the
promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS.
    (K) Air quality and modeling/data: The SIP must provide for
performing air quality modeling, as prescribed by the EPA, to predict
the effects on ambient air quality of any emissions of any NAAQS
pollutant, and for submission of such data to the EPA upon request.
    The TCEQ has the power and duty, under the TCAA to investigate and
develop facts providing for the functions of environmental air quality
assessments. Air quality modeling is conducted during development of
revisions to the Texas SIP, as appropriate for the State to demonstrate
attainment with required NAAQS. Modeling is also a part of the NSR
permitting program. Texas has the ability to perform modeling for the
primary and secondary SO2 standards and other NAAQS criteria
pollutant on a case-by-case permit basis consistent with their SIP-
approved PSD rules and with the EPA guidance. Upon request, Texas will
submit current and future air quality modeling data to the EPA.
    (L) Permitting Fees: The SIP must require each major stationary
source to pay permitting fees to the permitting authority, as a
condition of any permit required under the CAA, to cover the cost of
reviewing and acting upon any application for such a permit, and, if
the permit is issued, the costs of implementing and enforcing the terms
of the permit. The fee requirement applies until a fee program
established by the state pursuant to Title V of the CAA, relating to
operating permits, is approved by the EPA.
    The TCEQ assesses fees for reviewing permit applications and for
enforcing the terms and conditions of permits. See element (E) above
for the description of the mandatory collection of permitting fees
outlined in the SIP.
    (M) Consultation/participation by affected local entities: The SIP
must provide for consultation and participation by local political
subdivisions affected by the SIP.
    The TCEQ has several cooperative agreements and Memoranda of
Understanding with various other state and local agencies and
organizations. Consultation with a variety of different organizations
is a regular part of the TCEQ process for developing a SIP. See

element J herein for a discussion of the SIP's public participation
process, the authority to advise and consult, and the PSD SIP's public
participation requirements. Additionally, the TCAA also requires
initiation of cooperative action between local authorities and the
TCEQ, between one local authority and another, or among any combination
of local authorities and the TCEQ for control of air pollution in areas
having related air pollution problems that overlap the boundaries of
political subdivisions, and entering into agreements and compacts with
adjoining states and Indian tribes, where appropriate.

III. Proposed Action

    The EPA is proposing to approve the April 23, 2013, infrastructure
SIP submission from Texas, which addresses the requirements of CAA
sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as applicable to the 2010 SO2
NAAQS. Specifically, the EPA is proposing to approve the following
infrastructure elements, or portions thereof: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C),
(D)(i)(II) (PSD portion), D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and
(M). The EPA is not proposing action on: The portion pertaining to
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), which concerns interstate pollution
transport affecting attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS and the
portion pertaining to section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) pertaining to
visibility protection.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The EPA is not proposing to approve this infrastructure SIP
certification to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other
area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, this proposed approval
of an infrastructure SIP certification does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Sulfur dioxide reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: September 22, 2015.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2015-25337 Filed 10-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 28, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45162-45163]
[FR Doc No: 2019-18544]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2019-0010; OMB No. 1660-0083]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Community Disaster Loan (CDL) Program

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites
the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity
to comment on a revision, of a currently approved information
collection. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
this notice seeks comments concerning the Community Disaster Loan (CDL)
Program. This revision will combine collections found under OMB Control
Numbers 1660-0082 and 1660-0083. Upon approval of this revision, OMB
Control Number 1660-0082, Application for Community Disaster Loan
Cancellation will be discontinued.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before September 27, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the proposed information
collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the Desk
Officer for the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection should be made to Director,
Information Management Division, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,
email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
Martha Polanco, Program Manager, Disaster Assistance Directorate,
Public Assistance Division,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed information collection
previously published in the Federal Register on April 24, 2019 at 84
FR17183 with a 60 day public comment period. FEMA received one comment.
The commenter stated that loans following disasters, such as those
under the CDL Program, are important after disasters, and that Congress
and FEMA should ensure that adequate loan amounts are available for
jurisdictions with needs after disasters, particularly

for west coast States such as California, Oregon, and Washington,
following a major earthquake. The CDL Program provides operational
funding to help local governments that have incurred a significant loss
in revenue, due to a major disaster, that has or will adversely affect
their ability to provide essential municipal services. Local
governments within a declared disaster area are eligible to apply for
loans through the CDL program if they suffer a substantial loss of tax
and other revenues for the current or succeeding fiscal year.
Communities affected by major earthquakes, or any other Federally
declared major disasters, that meet the eligibility criteria may apply
for loans through the CDL program.
    The purpose of this notice is to notify the public that FEMA will
submit the information collection abstracted below to the Office of
Management and Budget for review and clearance.

Collection of Information

    Title: Community Disaster Loan (CDL) Program.
    Type of information collection: Revision of a currently approved
information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-0083.
    Form Titles and Numbers: FEMA Form 090-0-4, Letter of Application;
FEMA Form 090-0-1, Certification of Eligibility for Community Disaster
Loans; FEMA Form 116-0-1, Promissory Note; FEMA Form 085-0-1, Local
Government Resolution--Collateral Security; FEMA Form 112-0-3c,
Certification Regarding Lobbying; FEMA Form 009-0-15, Application for
Loan Cancellation.
    Abstract: The loan package for the CDL Program provides Local
governments that have suffered substantial loss of tax or other
revenues as a result of a major disaster or emergency, the opportunity
to obtain financial assistance in order to perform their governmental
functions. The loan must be justified on the basis of need and actual
expenses.
    Affected Public: State, local or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 360.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 360.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,006.67 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost: $53,937.11.
    Estimated Respondents' Operation and Maintenance Costs: $0.
    Estimated Respondents' Capital and Start-Up Costs: $0.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost to the Federal Government:
$1,022,264.28.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

William H. Holzerland,
Sr. Director for Information Management, Mission Support, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2019-18544 Filed 8-27-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-19-P