[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 122 (Wednesday, June 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36123-36124]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14771]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

Environmental Impact Statement for Dallas--Houston High Speed
Passenger Rail Corridor

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FRA is issuing this notice to advise the public that FRA and
the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) intend to prepare an EIS
pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) for
the impacts of constructing and operating a dedicated high-speed rail
(HSR) system (Proposed Action) proposed by the private company, Texas
Central High-Speed Railway (TCR), for the Central Texas High-Speed Rail
Corridor. The EIS will evaluate route alternatives for passenger rail
for the corridor between Dallas and Houston, which currently has no
passenger rail service. FRA will evaluate alternatives for construction
and operation of the Proposed Action consisting of a sealed HSR
corridor.

DATES: FRA invites the public, governmental agencies, and all other
interested parties to comment on the scope of the EIS. All such
comments should be provided in writing, within ninety (90) days of the
publication of this notice, at the address listed below. Comments may
also be provided orally or in writing at the scoping meetings. Scoping
meeting dates, times and locations, in addition to related information
about the EIS for the Central Texas High-Speed Rail Corridor can be
found online at http://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0700.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on the scope of the EIS may be mailed or
emailed within ninety (90) days of the publication of this notice to
Michael Johnsen, Lead Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of
Railroad Policy and Development, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., MS-20, Washington, DC 20590, or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Johnsen, Lead Environmental
Protection Specialist at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., MS-20, Washington,
DC 20590, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
Melissa Neeley, Director of Project Delivery Management, Environmental
Affairs Division of the Texas Department of Transportation, 118 E.
Riverside Drive, Austin, TX 78704. Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EIS will be prepared in accordance with
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA and the FRA's
Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts as set forth in 64 FR
28545, dated May 26, 1999 (Environmental Procedures). The EIS will also
address Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Section
4(f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966 (49 U.S.C.
303), Executive Order 12898 and USDOT Order 5610.2(a) on Environmental
Justice and other applicable Federal and state laws and regulations.
The EIS will address environmental impact issues of concern and will
include:
     Describing the purpose and need for the Proposed Action.
     Describing the environment likely to be affected by the
Proposed Action.
     Identifying the reasonable alternatives that satisfy the
purpose and need for the Proposed Action.
     Describing the no-build or no-action alternative to serve
as a baseline for comparison.
     Describing the potential environmental impacts associated
with the reasonable alternatives and mitigation to address significant
impacts.

FRA, in cooperation with TxDOT will prepare the EIS for the Central
Texas High-Speed Rail Corridor. The Proposed Action would connect
Dallas and Houston with a dedicated HSR system and establish
connectivity with other transportation services in Houston and Dallas.
As part of the EIS, the impacts of various alternative HSR route
alignments will be analyzed including shared corridors with other
existing linear infrastructure corridors such as railroads, roads, and
electric utility lines. The HSR system would be dedicated and would not
share track or infrastructure with existing trains and rail lines. In
addition, the EIS will analyze the potential impacts of

stations, power facilities, and maintenance facilities to support HSR
operations.
    TCR is a Texas-based company formed in 2009 to bring HSR to Texas
as a private-sector venture. Working closely with Central Japan Railway
Company (JRC), TCR proposes the deployment of JRC's N700-I Bullet
System based on the world's safest, most reliable, lowest emission,
electric-powered, HSR systems, called the Tokaido Shinkansen System
(Shinkansen). Developed and operated by JRC and the former Japan
National Railways, the Shinkansen has operated safely for almost 50
years and carries over 400,000 daily passengers. The most current
generation Shinkansen train, the N700, runs at speeds up to 186 miles
per hour.
    The EIS will describe an analysis of HSR alternatives in the study
area and evaluate the environmental impacts of reasonable alternatives
using a combination of Geographic Information System (GIS) data, field
investigations and site visits/sampling where necessary. The primary
environmental resources located within the study area that may be
affected are: agricultural, residential, commercial, and industrial
properties; streams and floodplains; wetlands and wildlife habitat; and
open space. FRA and TxDOT will work with TCR to develop alternatives
that avoid and minimize impacts to these resources, as well as cultural
resources and protected lands. Minimization and mitigation measures
will be identified within the EIS where appropriate.
    In accordance with the NEPA, the FRA and TxDOT invite comments and
suggestions regarding the scope of the EIS from all interested parties
to ensure that all issues are addressed related to this proposal and
any significant impacts are identified. Letters describing the EIS and
soliciting comments will be sent to appropriate federal, state, and
local agencies, Native American tribes, and private organizations who
might have previously expressed or who are known to have an interest in
the Proposed Action. Federal agencies with jurisdiction by law or
special expertise with respect to potential environmental issues will
be requested to act as a Cooperating Agency in accordance with 40 CFR
1501.16.
    TxDOT will lead the outreach activities beginning with scoping
meetings (dates to be determined). Public involvement initiatives
including public meetings, project Web site, and outreach will continue
throughout the EIS process. Opportunities for public participation will
be announced through mailings, notices, advertisements, press releases
and an EIS Web page, accessible at http://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0700.
One or more public hearings will be held after the Draft EIS is
released and made available for public and agency review. Public notice
will be given for the time and place of public hearings.
    Comments or questions concerning this Proposed Action and the scope
of the EIS are invited from all interested parties and should be
directed to the FRA at the address provided above.

    Authority: National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42
U.S.C. 4321 et. seq.)

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 19, 2014.
Michael M. Johnsen,
Acting Division Chief, Environment and Systems Planning.
[FR Doc. 2014-14771 Filed 6-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 248 (Monday, December 28, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84349-84350]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28561]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2020-N-0008]

Advisory Committee; Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory
Committee; Renewal

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; renewal of Federal advisory committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
renewal of the Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee
by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs (the Commissioner). The
Commissioner has determined that it is in the public interest to renew
the Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee for an
additional 2 years beyond the charter expiration date. The new charter
will be in effect until the October 28, 2022, expiration date.

DATES: Authority for the Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory
Committee will expire on October 28, 2022, unless the Commissioner
formally determines that renewal is in the public interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Prabhakara Atreya, Division of
Scientific Advisors and Consultants, Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10993 New Hampshire Ave.,
Bldg. 71, Rm. 6306, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 41 CFR 102-3.65 and approval by
the Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to 45 CFR part 11
and by the General Services Administration, FDA is announcing the
renewal of the Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee
(the Committee). The Committee is a discretionary Federal advisory
committee established to provide advice to the Commissioner. The
Committee advises the Commissioner or designee in discharging
responsibilities as they relate to helping to ensure safe and effective
drugs for human use and, as required, any other product for which FDA
has regulatory responsibility.
    The Committee reviews and evaluates available data relating to the
safety, effectiveness, and appropriate use of human cells, human
tissues, gene transfer therapies, and xenotransplantation products,
which are intended for transplantation,

implantation, infusion, and transfer in the prevention and treatment of
a broad spectrum of human diseases and in the reconstruction, repair,
or replacement of tissues for various conditions. The Committee also
considers the quality and relevance of FDA's research program, which
provides scientific support for the regulation of these products, and
makes appropriate recommendations to the Commissioner.
    The Committee shall consist of a core of 13 voting members,
including the Chair. Members and the Chair are selected by the
Commissioner or designee from among authorities knowledgeable in the
fields of cellular therapies, tissue transplantation, gene transfer
therapies, and xenotransplantation (biostatistics, bioethics,
hematology/oncology, human tissues and transplantation, reproductive
medicine, general medicine, and various medical specialties, including
surgery and oncology, immunology, virology, molecular biology, cell
biology, developmental biology, tumor biology, biochemistry, rDNA
technology, nuclear medicine, gene therapy, infectious diseases, and
cellular kinetics). Members will be invited to serve for overlapping
terms of up to 4 years. Almost all non-Federal members of this
Committee serve as Special Government Employees. The core of voting
members may include one technically qualified member, selected by the
Commissioner or designee, who is identified with consumer interests and
is recommended by either a consortium of consumer-oriented
organizations or other interested persons. In addition to the voting
members, the Committee may include one non-voting member who is
identified with industry interests.
    The Commissioner or designee shall have the authority to select
members of other scientific and technical FDA advisory committees
(normally not to exceed 10 members) to serve temporarily as voting
members and to designate consultants to serve temporarily as voting
members when: (1) expertise is required that is not available among
current voting standing members of the Committee (when additional
voting members are added to the Committee to provide needed expertise,
a quorum will be based on the combined total of regular and added
members) or (2) to comprise a quorum when, because of unforeseen
circumstances, a quorum is or will be lacking. Because of the size of
the Committee and the variety in the types of issues that it will
consider, FDA may, in connection with a particular committee meeting,
specify a quorum that is less than a majority of the current voting
members. The Agency's regulations (21 CFR 14.22(d)) authorize a
committee charter to specify quorum requirements.
    If functioning as a medical device panel, a non-voting
representative of consumer interests and a non-voting representative of
industry interests will be included in addition to the voting members.
    Further information regarding the most recent charter and other
information can be found at https://www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/cellular-tissue-and-gene-therapies-advisory-committee/charter-cellular-tissue-and-gene-therapies-advisory-committee or by contacting the
Designated Federal Officer (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). In
light of the fact that no change has been made to the committee name or
description of duties, no amendment will be made to 21 CFR 14.100.
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app.). For general information related to FDA advisory
committees, please visit us at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm.

    Dated: December 18, 2020.
Lauren K. Roth,
Acting Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-28561 Filed 12-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 28930]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10976]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Application
for Employment With the Federal Aviation Administration

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval for a new information collection.
The information collected is used to collect, process and report
Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) airborne and ground based observations
by the public of drone behavior that they consider suspicious or
illegal.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by July 11, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ronda
Thompson, Room 441, Federal Aviation Administration, ASP-110, 950
L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20024.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronda Thompson at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: Not assigned.
    Title: Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Event Reporting System
(UETS).
    Form Numbers: There are no FAA forms associated with this
collection. Information is collected via www.faa.gov/mobile external
site.
    Type of Review: New information collection.
    Background: Under the provisions of Public Law 112-95, the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) was given the authority and the
responsibility for assessing the flight behavior of Unmanned Aircraft
Systems and enable the reporting of UAS sightings that cause public
concern for safety, national security, and/or privacy. The UETS web
application will be used to collect, process and report UAS airborne
and ground based observations (by the public) of drone behavior that
they consider suspicious or illegal.
    Respondents: Approximately 6,000 responses annually.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 2.75 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 275 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 4, 2016.
Ronda Thompson,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, Performance, Policy, and
Records Management Branch, ASP-110.
[FR Doc. 2016-10976 Filed 5-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 231 (Monday, December 2, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72007-72008]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28672]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0558; Airspace Docket No. 13-AEA-10]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; McConnellsburg, PA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class E Airspace at McConnellsburg,
PA, to accommodate a new Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning
System (GPS) special Standard Instrument Approach Procedure (SIAP)
serving Fulton County Medical Center Heliport. This action enhances the
safety and airspace management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR)
operations within the National Airspace System.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, February 6, 2014. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group,

Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P. O. Box
20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On August 7, 2013, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to establish Class E airspace at
McConnellsburg, PA, (78 FR 48081) Docket No. FAA-2013-0558. Interested
parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments
were received. Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph
6005 of FAA Order 7400.9X dated August 7, 2013, and effective September
15, 2013, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class
E airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 establishes Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface within a 6 mile radius of the point in space
coordinates for Fulton County Medical Center Heliport, providing the
controlled airspace required to accommodate the new RNAV (GPS) Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures developed for the heliport. This action
enhances the safety and management of IFR operations within the
National Airspace System.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The FAA's authority to
issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the
United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in
more detail the scope of the agency's authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to
ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority as it establishes
controlled airspace at Fulton County Medical Center Heliport,
McConnellsburg, PA.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 7, 2013, effective September 15, 2013, is amended
as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward from 700
feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AEA PA E5 McConnellsburg, PA [New]

Fulton County Medical Center Heliport, PA
    (Lat. 39[deg]56'17'' N., long. 78[deg]00'27'' W.)
Point in Space Coordinates
    (Lat. 39[deg]55'25'' N., long. 78[deg]00'26'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6-mile radius of the Point in Space Coordinates (lat.
39[deg]55'25'' N., long.78[deg]00'26'' W.) serving Fulton County
Medical Center Heliport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on November, 19, 2013.
Kip B. Johns,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2013-28672 Filed 11-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Robin Dunkins/ RTP/ USEPA/ US 11/ 09/ 2005 03: 56 PM To Diane. Gelburd@ wdc. usda. gov, Margaret. Walsh@ wdc. usda. gov cc Sally Shaver/ RTP/ USEPA/ US@ EPA Subject PM NAAQS & ExEvents presentations Per our discussion yesterday, I am forwarding you a revised presentation of the PM NAAQS and also a presentation on the exceptional events.

thanks robin Robin Dunkins Leader, Organic Chemicals Group Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards US Environmental Protection Agency ( C504 03) ( phone) 919 541 5335 ( fax) 919 541 0072 dunkins. robin@ epa. gov


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 122 (Friday, June 24, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37012-37014]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15798]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0399]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Independence Day Fireworks Celebration for the City
of Richmond, Richmond, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
navigable waters of Richmond Inner Harbor, off of the Lucretia Edwards
Park in Richmond, CA in support of the Independence Day Fireworks
Celebration for the City of Richmond. This temporary safety zone is
established to ensure the safety of participants and spectators from
the dangers associated with the pyrotechnics. Unauthorized persons or
vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or
remaining in the safety zone without permission of the Captain of the
Port or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 9 a.m. through 10 p.m. on July 3,
2011.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0399 and are available online
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0399 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call Lieutenant Junior Grade Liezl Nicholas at (415)
399-7436, or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the event would occur before the
rulemaking process would be completed. Because of the dangers posed by
the pyrotechnics used in these fireworks displays, the safety zones are
necessary to provide for the safety of event participants, spectators,
spectator craft, and other vessels transiting the event area. For the
safety concerns noted, it would be impracticable to not have these
regulations in effect during the event.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Any delay in the effective date of
this rule would expose mariners to the dangers posed by the
pyrotechnics used in the fireworks display.

Background and Purpose

    The City of Richmond will sponsor the Independence Day Fireworks
Celebration for the City of Richmond on July 3, 2011, on the navigable
waters of Richmond Inner Harbor, off of the Lucretia Edwards Park,
Richmond, California. The fireworks display is meant for entertainment
purposes. This temporary safety zone establishes a temporary restricted
area on the waters surrounding the fireworks launch site during the
fireworks displays. This temporary safety zone around the launch site
is necessary to protect spectators, vessels, and other property from
the hazards associated with the pyrotechnics over the water. The Coast
Guard has granted the event sponsor a marine event permit for the
fireworks displays.

Discussion of Rule

    From 9 a.m. until 9:30 p.m. on July 3, 2011, the temporary safety
zone will extend 100 feet while pyrotechnics are loaded onto the land
launch site at position 37[deg]54'34.14'' N, 122[deg]21'16.93'' W (NAD
83). The fireworks display will occur from 9:30 p.m. until 9:50 p.m.,
during which the safety zone will extend 1,000 feet off of the Lucretia
Edwards Park land launch site at position 37[deg]51'40.34'' N,
122[deg]19'19.59'' W (NAD 83). At 10 p.m. the safety zone shall
terminate.
    The effect of the temporary safety zone will be to restrict
navigation in the vicinity of the fireworks site while the fireworks
are set up, and until the conclusion of the scheduled displays. Except
for persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain in the restricted area. These
regulations are needed to keep spectators and vessels a safe distance
away from the launch site to ensure the safety of participants,
spectators, and transiting vessels.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
    Although this rule restricts access to the waters encompassed by
the safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be significant. The
entities most likely to be affected are pleasure craft engaged in
recreational activities. In addition, the rule will only restrict
access for a limited time. Finally, the Public Broadcast Notice to
Mariners will notify the users of local waterway to ensure that the
safety zone will result in minimum impact.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently

owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
    Although this rule may affect owners and operators of pleasure
craft engaged in recreational activities and sightseeing, it will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities for several reasons: (i) This rule will encompass only a small
portion of the waterway for a limited period of time; (ii) vessel
traffic can pass safely around the area; (iii) vessels engaged in
recreational activities and sightseeing have ample space outside of the
affected areas of San Francisco Bay, CA, to engage in these activities;
and (iv) the maritime public will be advised in advance of this safety
zone via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under Figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves establishing,
disestablishing, or changing Regulated Navigation Areas and security or
safety zones.
    An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add temporary Sec.  165.T11-424 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T11-424  Safety Zone; Independence Day Fireworks Celebration
for the City of Richmond, Richmond, CA.

    (a) Location. (1) This temporary safety zone is established for the
navigable waters of Richmond Inner Harbor, off of the Lucretia Edwards
Park, Richmond, CA. The fireworks launch site will be located in
position: 37[deg]54'34.14'' N, 122[deg]21'16.93'' W (NAD 83).
    (2) From 9 a.m. until 9:30 p.m., the temporary safety zone will
extend 100 feet while pyrotechnics are loaded onto the land launch
site. From 9:30 p.m. until 9:50 p.m., the area to which the temporary
safety zone applies will encompass the navigable waters around the
fireworks launch site off of the Lucretia Edwards Park within a radius
of 1,000 feet. At 10 p.m., the safety zone shall terminate.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, ``designated
representative'' means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port San Francisco (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general regulations in Sec.  165.23,
entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.
    (2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or a designated representative.
    (3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or a designated representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated representative. Persons and vessels
may request permission to enter the safety zones on VHF-16 or through
the 24-hour Command Center at telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (d) Effective period. This section is effective from 9 a.m. through
10 p.m. on July 3, 2011.

    Dated: June 9, 2011.
Cynthia L. Stowe,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2011-15798 Filed 6-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: August 1, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 147)]
[Notices]
[Page 42074-42075]
[DOCID:fr01au07-54]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0936; FRL-8140-4]

Notice of Filing of Pesticide Petitions for Residues of Pesticide
Chemicals in or on Various Commodities

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the initial filing of pesticide
petitions proposing the establishment or modification of regulations
for residues of pesticide chemicals in or on various commodities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 31, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number and the pesticide petition number (PP) of interest, by one
of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal:  http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to the assigned docket ID number
and the pesticide petition number of interest. EPA's policy is that all
comments received will be included in the docket without change and may
be made available on-line at http://www.regulations.gov, including any

personal information provided, unless the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through
regulations.gov or e-mail. The regulations.gov website is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and
other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk
or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available in regulations.gov. To access the electronic docket, go to
http://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced Search,'' then ``Docket

Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where indicated and select the
``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on the regulations.gov
website to view the docket index or access available documents.
Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in

hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The person listed at the end of the
pesticide petition summary of interest.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed at the end of the pesticide petition
summary of interest.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

     1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
     2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at

your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. Docket ID Numbers

    When submitting comments, please use the docket ID number and the
pesticide petition number of interest, as shown in the table.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 PP Number                        Docket ID Number
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PP 6E7125                                   EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0471
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PP 6E7126                                   EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0471
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PP 6E7127                                   EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0471
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PP 6E7128                                   EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0471
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PP 7E7227                                   EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0535
------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    EPA is printing notice of the filing of pesticide petitions
received under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a, proposing the establishment or modification of
regulations in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of pesticide chemicals in
or on various food commodities. EPA has determined that the pesticide
petitions described in this notice contain data or information
regarding the elements set forth in FFDCA section 408(d)(2); however,
EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at
this time or whether the data support granting of the pesticide
petitions. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on these
pesticide petitions.
    Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a summary of each of the petitions
included in this notice, prepared by the petitioner, is included in a
docket EPA has created for each rulemaking. The docket for each of the
petitions is available on-line at http://www.regulations.gov.

New Tolerances

    1. PPs 6E7125, 6E7126, 6E7127 and 6E7128. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0471).
Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4), 500 College Road East,
Suite 201 W., Princeton, NJ 08540-6635, proposes to establish a
tolerance for residues of the insecticide bifenthrin ((2-methyl [1,1'-
biphenyl]-3-yl) methyl-3-(2-chloro-3,3,3,-trifluoro-1-propenyl)-2,2-
dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate) in or on food commodities pistachio at
0.05 parts per million (ppm); mayhaw at 1.4 ppm; vegetables, fruiting,
group 8 at 0.5 ppm; peanut at 0.05 ppm; soybean at 0.2 ppm; vegetable,
root, except sugar beet and garden beet, subgroup 1B at 0.07 ppm; beet,
garden, roots at 0.45 ppm; and beet, garden, tops at 15 ppm. There is a
practical analytical method for detecting and measuring levels of
bifenthrin in or on food with a limit of detection that allows
monitoring of food with residues at or above the levels set in these
tolerances gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC/ECD).
Contact: Shaja R. Brothers, telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    2. PP 7E7227. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0535). Interregional Research
Project Number 4 (IR-4), 500 College Road East, Suite 201 W.,
Princeton, NJ 08540-6635, proposes to establish a tolerance for
residues of the insecticide bifenthrin ((2-methyl [1,1'-biphenyl]-3-yl)
methyl-3-(2-chloro-3,3,3,-trifluoro-1-propenyl)-2,2-
dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate) in or on food commodities bushberry
subgroup 13-B and juneberry; lingonberry; salal; aronia berry;
blueberry, lowbush; buffalo currant; chilean guava; European barberry;
highbush cranberry; honeysuckle; jostaberry; native currant; sea
buckthorn at 2.0 ppm; and leafy petioles subgroup 4-B at 3.0 ppm. There
is a practical analytical method for detecting and measuring levels of
bifenthrin in or on food with a limit of detection that allows
monitoring of food with residues at or above the levels set in these
tolerances GC/ECD. Contact: Shaja R. Brothers, telephone number: (703)
308-3194; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives,
Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: July 18, 2007.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. E7-14698 Filed 7-31-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26544-26547]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10804]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0227; FRL-9668-7]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Servicing of Motor Vehicle Air Conditioners, EPA ICR
Number 1617.07, OMB Control Number 2060-0247

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that EPA is planning to
submit a request to renew an existing approved Information Collection
Request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This ICR is
scheduled to expire on May 31, 2012. Before submitting the ICR to OMB
for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific aspects
of the proposed information collection as described below.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 3, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2012-0227 by one of the following methods:
     www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) Mailcode: 6102T,
Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0227, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460.
     Hand Delivery: Public Reading Room, Room 3334, EPA West
Building, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC, Attention
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0227. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2012-0227. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise

protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The www.regulations.gov
Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA
without going through www.regulations.gov your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yaidi Cancel, Stratospheric Protection
Division, Office of Atmospheric Programs, (MC 6205J), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

How can I access the docket and/or submit comments?

    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0227, which is available for online viewing at
www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Air Docket in the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the Air Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use www.regulations.gov to obtain a copy of the draft collection of
information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing
of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the
public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system,
select ``search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified in this
document.

What information is EPA particularly interested in?

    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA specifically
solicits comments and information to enable it to:
    (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    (ii) evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden
of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
    (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and
    (iv) minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from
very small businesses (those that employ less than 25 people) on
examples of specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce
the paperwork burden for very small businesses affected by this
collection.

What should I consider when I prepare my comments for EPA?

    You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
    1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific
examples.
    2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
    3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
    4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
    5. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.
    6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
    7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.

What information collection activity or ICR does this apply to?

    Affected entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
new and old motor vehicle dealers, motor vehicle air conditioning
service stations, general automotive repair shops, and automotive
repair shops not elsewhere classified.
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1617.07, OMB Control No. 2060-0247.
    ICR status: This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on May 31,
2012. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal
Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed
either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate
means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if
applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: Section 609 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (Act)
provides general guidelines for motor vehicle air conditioning (MVAC)
refrigerant handling and MVAC servicing. It states that ``no person
repairing or servicing motor vehicles for consideration may perform any
service on a motor vehicle air conditioner involving the refrigerant
for such air conditioner without properly using approved refrigerant
recovery and/or recovery and recycling equipment (hereafter referred to
as ``refrigerant handling equipment'') and no such person may perform
such service unless such person has been properly trained and
certified.''
    In 1992, EPA developed the initial regulations under section 609
that were published in 57 FR 31242, and codified at 40 CFR Subpart B
(Sec.  82.30 et seq.). The information required to be collected under
the Section 609 regulations is currently approved for use through May
31, 2012. This statement is submitted to justify an extension of the
approval of use of this information. Pursuant to new requirements under
the Paperwork Reduction Act, a notice was published in the Federal
Register on June 9, 2008 (73 FR 32570), announcing the intent to extend
the renewal of this Information Collection Request and requesting
comment on the renewal. Descriptions of the recordkeeping and reporting
requirements mandated by section 609 and delineated in 40 CFR 82
subpart B are summarized below in this section.
    Approved Refrigerant Handling Equipment: In accordance with Section
609(b)(2)(A), 40 CFR 82.36 requires that refrigerant handling equipment
be certified by EPA or independent standards testing organization.
Certification standards are particular to

the type of equipment and the refrigerant to be recovered, and must be
consistent with the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) standards for
MVAC equipment.
    Approved independent standards testing organizations: Section
609(b)(2)(A) of the Act requires independent laboratory testing of
refrigerant handling equipment to be certified by EPA. The
Stratospheric Protection Division (SPD) requires independent
laboratories to submit an application that documents: The
organization's capacity to accurately test equipment compliance with
applicable standards consistent with the SAE standards for handling
refrigerant, an absence of conflict of interest or financial benefit
based on test outcomes, and an agreement to allow EPA access to verify
application information. Once an independent laboratory has been
approved by EPA, the application is kept on file in the SPD. Two
laboratories--Underwriters Laboratories Inc. and ETL Testing
Laboratories--are currently approved to test refrigerant handling
equipment. EPA does not anticipate that any organizations will apply to
EPA in the future to become approved independent standards testing
organizations. Therefore, annual hours and costs related to information
submitted by these organizations have been eliminated.
    Technician training and certification: According to Section
609(b)(4) of the Act, automotive technicians are required to be trained
and certified in the proper use of approved refrigerant handling
equipment. Programs that perform technician training and certification
activities must apply to the SPD for approval by submitting
verification that its program meets EPA standards. The information
requested is used by the SPD to guarantee a degree of uniformity in the
testing programs for motor vehicle service technicians.
    Due to rapid developments in technology, the Agency requires that
each approved technician certification program conducts periodic
reviews and updates of test material, submitting a written summary of
the review and program changes to EPA every two years. After the test
has been approved by EPA, a hard copy remains on file with SPD.
Currently, 19 testing programs are approved by EPA to train technicians
in the proper use of refrigerant handling equipment. Five of these
programs are designed specifically for individual company's own
employees.
    Certification, reporting and recordkeeping: To facilitate
enforcement under Section 609, EPA developed several recordkeeping
requirements codified at 40 CFR 82.42(b). All required records must be
retained on-site for a minimum of three years, unless otherwise
indicated.
    According to Section 609(c) of the Act states that by January 1,
1992, no person may service any motor vehicle air conditioner without
being properly trained and certified, nor without using properly
approved refrigerant handling equipment. The regulation at 40 CFR
82.42(a) states that by January 1, 1993, each service provider must
have submitted to EPA on a one-time basis a statement signed by the
owner of the equipment or another responsible officer that provides the
name of the equipment purchaser, the address of the service
establishment where the equipment will be located, the manufacturer
name, equipment model number, date of manufacture, and equipment serial
number. The statement must also indicate that the equipment will be
properly used in servicing motor vehicle air conditioners and that each
individual authorized by the purchaser to perform service is property
trained and certified. The information is used by EPA to verify
compliance with Section 609 of the Act.
    Any person who owns approved refrigerant handling equipment must
maintain records of the name and address of any facility to which
refrigerant is sent. Additionally, any person who owns approved
refrigerant handling equipment must retain records for a minimum of
three years demonstrating that all persons authorized to operate the
equipment are certified technicians.
    Finally, any person who sells or distributes a class I or class II
refrigerant that is in a container of less than 20 pounds must verify
that the purchaser is a properly trained and certified technician,
unless the purchase of small containers is for resale only. In that
case, the seller must obtain a written statement from the purchaser
that the containers are for resale only, and must indicate the
purchaser's name and business address. When a certified technician
purchases small containers of refrigerant for servicing motor vehicles,
the seller must have a reasonable basis for believing the accuracy of
the information presented by the purchaser. In all cases, the seller
must display a sign where sales occur that states the certification
requirements for purchasers.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.13
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
    Estimated total number of potential respondents: 52,721.
    Frequency of response: On occasion.
    Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent: 1.
    Estimated total annual burden hours: 4,522.5 hours.
    Estimated total annual costs: $35,313.59.
    This includes an estimated burden cost of $35,313.59 and an
estimated cost of $0 for capital investment or maintenance and
operational costs.

Are there changes in the estimates from the last approval?

    There is a decrease of 2,114 hours in the total estimated
respondent burden compared with that identified in the ICR currently
approved by OMB. There are two reasons for this decrease in burden
hours. In 2008, it was estimated that there would be 1,370 purchases of
small containers of class I and class II refrigerant for resale only by
uncertified purchasers. It is estimated that at the time (in 2008),
there were an estimated 3 million R-12 MVACs on the road. Today, it is
estimated that there are only 600 thousand R-12 MVACs on the road, or
roughly 2.4 million or 80% less than there were in 2008. Therefore, to
account for the decreased market for small containers of CFC-12
refrigerant, this ICR estimates that the number of purchases for resale
only by uncertified purchasers of small cans will be 80% less than in
2008, or approximately 274 purchases.
    The second reason the burden hours have decreased is that CFC-12
refrigerant sent off-site for reclamation to an approved refrigerant
reclaimed by owners of refrigerant recycling equipment certified under
40 CFR 82.36(a) has decreased and is

anticipated to continue decreasing due to the significant decline of
CFC-12 vehicles on road. The third reason the burden hours have
decreased is that there are less approved technician certification
programs in business than in the previous ICR. However, EPA anticipates
a slow increase of one organization approval per year as new
alternative refrigerants become available and new businesses become
interested in certifying technicians for MVAC servicing for
consideration.

What is the next step in the process for this ICR?

    EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. At that time, EPA will
issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. If you have any
questions about this ICR or the approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Dated: April 26, 2012.
Sarah Dunham,
Director, Office of Atmospheric Programs.
[FR Doc. 2012-10804 Filed 5-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 8, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30383-30387]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11956]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0098; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01121-T;
Amendment 39-21564; AD 2021-11-02]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; MHI RJ Aviation ULC (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2019-22-
07, which applied to all MHI RJ Aviation ULC Model CL-600-2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes, Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional
Jet Series 700, 701 & 702) airplanes, Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet
Series 705) airplanes, Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900)
airplanes, and Model CL-600-2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes.
AD 2019-22-07 required revising the existing airplane flight manual
(AFM) to include a limitation and an abnormal operating procedure for
the Automatic Flight Control System (AFCS). This AD requires revising
the existing AFM and adding airplanes to the applicability. This AD was
prompted by a finding that the limitation and abnormal operating
procedure did not include reference to a certain mode. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective July 13, 2021.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of July 13,
2021.

ADDRESSES: For Bombardier service information identified in this final
rule, contact MHI RJ Aviation ULC, 12655 Henri-Fabre Blvd., Mirabel,
Qu[eacute]bec J7N 1E1 Canada; Widebody Customer Response Center North
America toll-free telephone +1-844-272-2720 or direct-dial telephone
+1-514-855-8500; fax +1-514-855-8501; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet
https://mhirj.com. You may view this referenced service information at
the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also
available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0098.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-
0098; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, any comments received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Dzierzynski, Aerospace
Engineer, Avionics and Electrical Systems Section, FAA, New York ACO
Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone
516-228-7367; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued TCCA AD CF-2018-32R1, dated August 21,
2020 (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or the MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition for all MHI
RJ Aviation ULC Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440), CL-
600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702), CL-600-2C11 (Regional
Jet Series 550), CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), CL-600-2D24
(Regional Jet Series 900), and CL-600-2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000)
airplanes. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2021-0098.
    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2019-22-07, Amendment 39-19786 (85 FR 439,
January 6, 2020) (AD 2019-22-07). AD 2019-22-07 applied to all MHI RJ
Aviation ULC Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440)
airplanes, Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702)
airplanes, Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, Model
CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, and Model CL-600-2E25
(Regional Jet Series 1000)

airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on February 24,
2021 (86 FR 11165). The NPRM was prompted by a finding that the
limitation and abnormal operating procedure did not include reference
to (V) ALTV CAP mode and a finding that the MHI RJ Aviation ULC Model
CL-600-2C11 (Regional Jet Series 550) airplanes are also affected by
the same unsafe condition (Model CL-600-2B19 airplanes do not have (V)
ALTS CAP or (V) ALTV CAP mode). The risk of the unsafe condition also
exists during (V) ALTV CAP mode. The NPRM proposed to require revising
the existing AFM and adding airplanes to the applicability. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address an engine failure, if it occurs during or
before a climb while in ALTS CAP, (V) ALTS CAP, or (V) ALTV CAP mode,
which may cause the airspeed to drop significantly below the safe
operating speed, possibly resulting in reduced control of the airplane.
See the MCAI for additional background information.

Comments

    The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. The FAA has considered the comment
received. The Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA) stated
that it supports the NPRM.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment
received, and determined that air safety and the public interest
require adopting this final rule as proposed, except for minor
editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Bombardier has issued the following service information, which
describes procedures for revising the existing AFM by including a
limitation that specifies a warning for the AFCS and an abnormal
operating procedure if an engine failure occurs during or before a
climb while in ALTS CAP mode, (V) ALTS CAP mode, or (V) ALTV CAP mode,
as applicable. These documents are distinct since they apply to
different airplane models.
     Section 02-08, ``System Limitations,'' of Chapter 2,
``LIMITATIONS''; and Section 05-02, ``In-Flight Engine Failures,'' of
Chapter 5, ``ABNORMAL PROCEDURES''; of the Bombardier CRJ Series
Regional Jet Model CL-600-2B19 AFM, CSP A-012, Volume 1, Revision 73,
dated January 3, 2020.
     Section 02-08, ``System Limitations,'' of Chapter 2,
``LIMITATIONS''; and Section 05-02, ``In-Flight Engine Failures,'' of
Chapter 5, ``ABNORMAL PROCEDURES''; of the Bombardier CRJ Series
Regional Jet Model CL-600-2C10 (Series 700, 701, 702) and CL-600-2C11
(Series 550) AFM, CSP B-012, Revision 31, dated May 8, 2020.
     Section 02-08, ``System Limitations,'' of Chapter 2,
``LIMITATIONS''; and Section 05-02, ``In-Flight Engine Failures,'' of
Chapter 5, ``ABNORMAL PROCEDURES''; of the Bombardier CRJ Series
Regional Jet Model CL-600-2D24 (Series 900) and CL-600-2D15 (Series
705) AFM, CSP C-012, Volume 1, Revision 24, dated March 27, 2020.
     Section 02-08, ``System Limitations,'' of Chapter 2,
``LIMITATIONS''; and Section 05-02, ``In-Flight Engine Failures,'' of
Chapter 5, ``ABNORMAL PROCEDURES''; of the Bombardier CRJ Series
Regional Jet Model CL-600-2E25 (Series 1000) AFM, CSP D-012, Revision
23, dated February 14, 2020.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 992 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
               Action                         Labor cost            Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New actions........................  1 work-hour x $85 per hour               $0             $85         $84,320
                                      = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2019-22-07, Amendment 39-19786
(85 FR 439, January 6, 2020); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:

2021-11-02 MHI RJ Aviation ULC (Type Certificate Previously Held by
Bombardier, Inc.): Amendment 39-21564; Docket No. FAA-2021-0098;
Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01121-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective July 13, 2021.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2019-22-07, Amendment 39-19786 (85 FR 439,
January 6, 2020) (AD 2019-22-07).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the MHI RJ Aviation ULC airplanes identified
in paragraphs (c)(1) through (6) of this AD, certificated in any
category, all manufacturer serial numbers.
    (1) Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes.
    (2) Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702)
airplanes.
    (3) Model CL-600-2C11 (Regional Jet Series 550) airplanes.
    (4) Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes.
    (5) Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes.
    (6) Model CL-600-2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 22, Auto Flight.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report that during the Automatic
Flight Control System (AFCS) ALTS CAP, (V) ALTS CAP, or (V) ALTV CAP
mode, the flight guidance/autopilot does not account for engine
failure while capturing an altitude. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address an engine failure, if it occurs during or before a climb
while in ALTS CAP, (V) ALTS CAP, or (V) ALTV CAP mode, which may
cause the airspeed to drop significantly below the safe operating
speed, possibly resulting in reduced control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Revision of the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM)

    Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD: Revise the
existing AFM to include the information in Subject 2, ``AUTOMATIC
FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM (AFCS),'' of Section 02-08, ``System
Limitations,'' of Chapter 2, ``LIMITATIONS''; and Subject 1.C,
``Engine Failure in Climb During ALTS CAP,'' or Subject 1.D,
``Engine Failure in Climb During (V) ALTS CAP or (V) ALTV CAP,'' of
Section 05-02, ``In-flight Engine Failures,'' of Chapter 5,
``ABNORMAL PROCEDURES''; as applicable; of the applicable AFM
identified in figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR08JN21.015

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD, using the applicable AFM specified in figure 2 to
paragraph (h) of this AD.

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR08JN21.016

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If
sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or MHI RJ
Aviation ULC's TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If approved
by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.

(j) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) TCCA AD CF-2018-32R1, dated August 21, 2020, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2021-0098.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Steven
Dzierzynski, Aerospace Engineer, Avionics and Electrical Systems
Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (3) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (k)(3) and (4) of this AD.

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Section 02-08, ``System Limitations,'' of Chapter 2,
``LIMITATIONS,'' of Bombardier CRJ Series Regional Jet Model CL-600-
2B19 Airplane Flight Manual (AFM), CSP A-012, Volume 1, Revision 73,
dated January 3, 2020.
    (ii) Section 05-02, ``In-flight Engine Failures,'' of Chapter 5,
``ABNORMAL PROCEDURES,'' of Bombardier CRJ Series Regional Jet Model
CL-600-2B19 Airplane Flight Manual (AFM), CSP A-012, Volume 1,
Revision 73, dated January 3, 2020.
    (iii) Section 02-08, ``System Limitations,'' of Chapter 2,
``LIMITATIONS,'' of Bombardier CRJ Series Regional Jet Model CL-600-
2C10 (Series 700, 701, 702) and CL-600-2C11 (Series 550) AFM, CSP B-
012, Revision 31, dated May 8, 2020.
    (iv) Section 05-02, ``In-flight Engine Failures,'' of Chapter 5,
``ABNORMAL PROCEDURES,'' of Bombardier CRJ Series Regional Jet Model
CL-600-2C10 (Series 700, 701, 702) and CL-600-2C11 (Series 550) AFM,
CSP B-012, Revision 31, dated May 8, 2020.
    (v) Section 02-08, ``System Limitations,'' of Chapter 2,
``LIMITATIONS,'' of Bombardier CRJ Series Regional Jet Model CL-600-
2D24 (Series 900) and Model CL-600-2D15 (Series 705) AFM, CSP C-012,
Volume 1, Revision 24, dated March 27, 2020.
    (vi) Section 05-02, ``In-flight Engine Failures,'' of Chapter 5,
``ABNORMAL PROCEDURES,'' of Bombardier CRJ Series Regional Jet Model
CL-600-2D24 (Series 900) and Model CL-600-2D15 (Series 705) AFM, CSP
C-012, Volume 1, Revision 24, dated March 27, 2020.
    (vii) Section 02-08, ``System Limitations,'' of Chapter 2,
``LIMITATIONS,'' of Bombardier CRJ Series Regional Jet Model

CL-600-2E25 (Series 1000) AFM, CSP D-012, Revision 23, dated
February 14, 2020.
    (viii) Section 05-02, ``In-flight Engine Failures,'' of Chapter
5, ``ABNORMAL PROCEDURES,'' of Bombardier CRJ Series Regional Jet
Model CL-600-2E25 (Series 1000) AFM, CSP D-012, Revision 23, dated
February 14, 2020.
    (3) For Bombardier service information identified in this AD,
contact MHI RJ Aviation ULC, 12655 Henri-Fabre Blvd., Mirabel,
Qu[eacute]bec J7N 1E1 Canada; Widebody Customer Response Center
North America toll-free telephone +1-844-272-2720 or direct-dial
telephone +1-514-855-8500; fax +1-514-855-8501; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet https://mhirj.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on May 11, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-11956 Filed 6-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P