[Federal Register: August 16, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 157)]
[Notices]
[Page 50034-50036]
[DOCID:fr16au10-132]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0109]

Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of
information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and reinstatements of previously
approved collections.
    This document describes an Information Collection Request (ICR) for
which NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before October 15, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation Dockets, 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
You may also submit comments electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov. All comments should refer to the Docket No. NHTSA-
2010-0109.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Cicchino, Ph.D, Contracting
Officer's Technical Representative, Office of Behavioral Safety
Research (NTI-131), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE., W46-491, Washington, DC 20590. Dr. Cicchino's
phone number is<PHONE_NUMBER> and her e-mail address is
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
    (i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper

performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
    (ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
    (iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
    (iv) How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
    In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks public comment on
the following proposed collection of information:
    Title: The Effect of Entry-Level Motorcycle Rider Training on
Motorcycle Crashes.
    Type of Request: New information collection request.
    OMB Clearance Number: None.
    Form Number: This collection of information uses no standard forms.
    Requested Expiration Date of Approval: 3 years from date of
approval.
    Summary of the Collection of Information: The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) plans on combining information
from surveys, motorcycle riding skills tests, and archival records to
examine the effect of entry-level motorcycle rider training on safe
motorcycle riding. Participation by respondents will be voluntary.
Surveys will be used to collect information from motorcycle riders on
topics such as demographics, attitudes towards safety, miles and years
of riding experience, purpose of riding, training history, alcohol use
while riding, use of helmets and protective gear while riding, and
riding experience under different conditions (for instance, in
inclement weather or while fatigued).
    This information will be used to initially match riders that have
received entry-level training with untrained riders at the start of the
study to ensure that these groups are comparable in terms of
demographics, safety attitudes, riding experience, and purpose of
riding. Survey information will additionally supplement data from
skills tests of riders' on-motorcycle performance and archival data on
riders' crashes, injury severity, and motor vehicle citations. Data
collected from motorcycle riders that have received entry-level rider
training will be compared to data from untrained motorcycle riders.
    Surveys will be conducted electronically over the internet when
possible, with a pen-and-paper option available if preferred by the
respondent.
    Need and Use of Information: NHTSA's mission is to save lives,
prevent injuries, and reduce healthcare and other economic costs
associated with motor vehicle crashes. A total of 5,290 motorcycle
riders lost their lives in traffic crashes in 2008. This represents a
150% increase in the number of motorcycle fatalities since 1997. In
contrast, the number of fatalities from car crashes has decreased
during this time.
    Motorcycle rider training is a part of most States' motorcycle
safety programs, and funds are set aside under Section 2010 of SAFETEA-
LU in part to help States increase their motorcycle training. A study
conducted by Billheimer (1998) found that trained riders with less than
500 miles of riding experience had a lower crash rate than untrained
riders during the six months after training. Other studies conducted on
the effectiveness of motorcycle rider training in the United States,
however, have not found an effect of motorcycle rider training on
crashes. Thus, the extent to which motorcycle rider training reduces
crash involvement is unclear.
    In 2000, NHTSA and the Motorcycle Safety Foundation published the
National Agenda for Motorcycle Safety (NAMS), which includes
recommendations to improve motorcycle safety efforts in the United
States. One of the recommendations in the NAMS is to ``conduct uniform
follow-up research into the effectiveness and impact of rider education
and training.'' NHTSA convened an expert panel in 2008 to discuss the
best way to perform a comprehensive study of the effectiveness of
motorcycle rider training (Brock, Robinson, Robinson & Percer, 2010).
The panel concluded that such a study should examine the effect of
rider training on the characteristics of a safe rider, which would
encompass riders' on-motorcycle skills in addition to the outcomes of
their riding (crashes and injuries) and their preparation for riding
(such as avoiding impairments). The proposed study will carry out the
recommendations of the expert panel.
    Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number,
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information):
Respondents will be motorcycle riders that have and have not completed
an entry-level motorcycle rider training course, with an emphasis on
novice riders with less than 500 miles of riding experience.
Participation will be solicited through motorcycle rider training
courses, Departments of Motor Vehicles, motorcycle dealerships,
motorcycle accessory shops, and at motorcycle trade shows.
    Under this collection, up to 16,000 motorcycle riders (8,000
trained and 8,000 untrained) will participate in an initial screening
survey. Of this initial sample, approximately 625 trained riders will
be matched with 625 untrained riders on the basis of similarities in
their demographics, safety attitudes, riding experience, and riding
purpose for a total of 1,250 riders. These 1,250 motorcycle riders will
participate in two additional follow-up surveys: One six months after
the initial matching survey, and one 18 months after the initial
matching survey. Consequently, of the initial 16,000 respondents, the
1,250 matched riders will be surveyed three times over 18 months, and
the 14,750 unmatched riders will be surveyed once. The purpose of this
matched pairs survey is to obtain information on how trained and
untrained motorcycle riders prepare for riding and on their prior
riding experience, which will supplement data from archival records on
crashes, injury severity, and motor vehicle citations.
    An additional group of motorcycle riders will respond to surveys in
conjunction with participating in a motorcycle riding skills test. Two
hundred seventy motorcycle riders, 135 trained and 135 untrained, will
complete a survey and an on-motorcycle skills test shortly after
receiving training (for trained riders) or shortly after beginning the
study (for untrained riders). The same number of riders will complete a
follow-up survey and on-motorcycle skills test six months later.
    Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of Information: The initial screening
survey will take approximately 15 minutes to complete, and all other
surveys will take approximately 12 minutes to complete. The estimated
burden for respondents that participate in the initial screening survey
only is 3,687.5 hours (14,750 respondents at 15 minutes each). The
additional estimated burden for the 1,250 riders that are matched from
the screening survey is 812.5 hours (1,250 respondents, surveys at
three time points, 15 minutes for the first survey, 12 minutes each for
subsequent surveys). Finally, the estimated burden for the information
collected from the skills test participants is 108 hours (270
respondents, surveys at two time points, 12 minutes each).

    The total burden resulting from the collection of information is
4,608 hours. For the respondents that participate in the initial
screening survey only, the annual estimated burden is 3,687.5 hours.
For the 1,250 respondents matched from the screening survey, the
estimated annual burden is 542 hours (812.5 hours total over a period
of 18 months). For the riders that will participate in the on-
motorcycle skills test, the estimated annual burden from information
collection is 108 hours. Therefore, the total estimated annual burden
is 4,337.5 hours. The respondents would not incur any recordkeeping
burden or recordkeeping cost from the information collection.

    Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A).

Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010-20162 Filed 8-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register: April 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 69)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 18449-18451]
[DOCID:fr12ap10-17]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2008-1017]
RIN 1625-AA11

Regulated Navigation Areas; Bars Along the Coasts of Oregon and
Washington; Amendment

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the Regulated Navigation
Area (RNA) covering the Umpqua River Bar in Oregon so that it does not
include those waters between ``Navigation Aid Number 8'' and
``Navigation Aid Number 6'' on the Umpqua River. The change has been
requested by a number of individuals and organizations that believe
they are able to safely use those waters when the bar is restricted or
closed.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 12, 2010. Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before May 12, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2008-1017 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail LT Kion Evans, Thirteenth Coast Guard District,
Prevention Division; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2008-1017), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via http://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received
by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you
fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2008-1017'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble

as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2008-1017'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one on or before May 12, 2010 using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.

Background and Purpose

    On November 17, 2009, the Coast Guard published a Final Rule
entitled ``Regulated Navigation Areas; Bars Along the Coasts of Oregon
and Washington'' in the Federal Register (74 FR 59098), which
established Regulated Navigation Areas covering each of the coastal
bars in Oregon and Washington. Following implementation of the rule, as
codified at 33 CFR 165.1325, on December 17, 2009, the Coast Guard
began receiving feedback from a number of individuals and organizations
that use the waters near the Umpqua River Bar in Oregon indicating that
the RNA covering that bar, as defined in 33 CFR 165.1325(a)(12), is too
large in that they believe they are able to safely use the area between
``Navigation Aid Number 8'' and ``Navigation Aid Number 6'' in the
Umpqua River when the bar is restricted or closed.
    In light of the public desires expressed, the possible economic
impact on the local community, and the Coast Guard's assessment that
mariners are, in most circumstances, able to safely operate between
``Navigation Aid Number 8'' and ``Navigation Aid Number 6'' on the
Umpqua River when the bar is restricted or closed, the Coast Guard
proposes to change the Umpqua River Bar RNA as defined in 33 CFR
65.1325(a)(12) to allow such use without obtaining permission of the
Captain of the Port or his/her designated representatives.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The proposed rule will change the Umpqua River Bar Regulated
Navigation Area as defined in 33 CFR 165.1325(a)(12) so that it does
not include those waters between ``Navigation Aid Number 8'' and
``Navigation Aid Number 6'' on the Umpqua River.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. The Coast Guard has made
this determination based on the fact that this rule will simply reduce
the size of an established Regulated Navigation Area.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule will affect those small entities
that use the waters near the Umpqua River Bar. The rule would not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, however, because it will simply reduce the size of an
established Regulated Navigation Area.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact LT Kion Evans, Thirteenth Coast
Guard District, Prevention Division; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise

have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves the
reduction in size of a Regulated Navigation Area. We seek any comments
or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

    1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and
160.5; Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

    2. Amend Sec.  165.1325 by revising paragraph (a)(12) to read as
follows:

Sec.  165.1325  Regulated Navigation Areas; Bars Along the Coasts of
Oregon and Washington.

    (a) * * *
    12) Umpqua River Bar, Oreg.: From a point on the shoreline at
43[deg]41'20'' N., 124[deg]11'58'' W. thence westward to 43[deg]41'20''
N., 124[deg]13'32'' W. thence southward to 43[deg]38'35'' N.,
124[deg]14'25'' W. thence eastward to a point on the shoreline at
43[deg]38'35'' N., 124[deg]12'35'' W. thence northward along the
shoreline to the north end of the training jetty at 43[deg]40'15'' N.,
124[deg]11'49'' W. thence northward to a point on the west bank of the
entrance channel at 43[deg]40'40'' N., 124[deg]11'41'' W. thence
southwestward along the west bank of the entrance channel thence
northward along the seaward shoreline to the beginning.
* * * * *

    Dated: March 26, 2010.
G.T. Blore,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2010-8208 Filed 4-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: June 25, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 123)]
[Notices]
[Page 36099]
[DOCID:fr25jn08-108]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1768-DR]

Wisconsin; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Wisconsin (FEMA-1768-DR), dated June 14, 2008, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: June 18, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Wisconsin is hereby amended to include the following
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his
declaration of June 14, 2008.

    Dodge, Green, Washington, Waukesha, and Winnebago Counties for
Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in
Presidential Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidential Declared
Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and
Households; 97.050, Presidential Declared Disaster Assistance to
Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-14316 Filed 6-24-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P


Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards found in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted by USDOT at 2 CFR
part 1201. A project carried out under the INFRA program will be
treated as if the project is located on a Federal-aid highway.
Additionally, applicable Federal laws, rules and regulations of the
relevant operating administration administering the project will apply
to the projects that receive INFRA grants, including planning
requirements, Stakeholder Agreements, and other requirements under the
Department's other highway, transit, rail, and port grant programs. For
an illustrative list of the applicable laws, rules, regulations,
executive orders, policies, guidelines, and requirements as they relate
to an INFRA grant, please see http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/Freight/infrastructure/nsfhp/fy2016_gr_exhbt_c/index.htm.
    As expressed in Executive Order 14005, Ensuring the Future Is Made
in All of America by All of America's Workers (86 FR 7475), it is the
policy of the executive branch to maximize, consistent with law, the
use of goods, products, and materials produced in, and services offered
in, the United States. All INFRA projects are subject to the Buy
America requirement at 23 U.S.C. 313. The Department expects all INFRA
applicants to comply with that requirement without needing a waiver. To
obtain a waiver, a recipient must be prepared to demonstrate how they
will maximize the use of domestic goods, products, and materials in
constructing their project.
    The applicability of Federal requirements to a project may be
affected by the scope of the NEPA reviews for that project. For
example, under 23 U.S.C. 313(g), Buy America requirements apply to all
contracts that are eligible for assistance under title 23, United
States Code, and are carried out within the scope of the NEPA finding,
determination, or decision regardless of the funding source of such
contracts if at least one contract is funded with Title 23 funds.
    In connection with any program or activity conducted with or
benefiting from funds awarded under this notice, recipients of funds
must comply with all applicable requirements of Federal law, including,
without limitation, the Constitution of the United States; the
conditions of performance, nondiscrimination requirements, and other
assurances made applicable to the award of funds in accordance with
regulations of the Department of Transportation; and applicable Federal
financial assistance and contracting principles promulgated by the
Office of Management and Budget. In complying with these requirements,
recipients, in particular, must ensure that no concession agreements
are denied or other contracting decisions made on the basis of speech
or other activities protected by the First Amendment. If the Department
determines that a recipient has failed to comply with applicable
Federal requirements, the Department may terminate the award of funds
and disallow previously incurred costs, requiring the recipient to
reimburse any expended award funds.
    INFRA projects involving vehicle acquisition must involve only
vehicles that comply with applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards and Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations, or vehicles
that are exempt from Federal Motor Carrier Safety Standards or Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Regulations in a manner that allows for the legal
acquisition and deployment of the vehicle or vehicles.

3. Reporting

a. Progress Reporting on Grant Activity
    Each applicant selected for an INFRA grant must submit the Federal
Financial Report (SF-425) on the financial condition of the project and
the project's progress, as well as an Annual Budget Review and Program
Plan to monitor the use of Federal funds and ensure accountability and
financial transparency in the INFRA program.
b. Reporting of Matters Related to Integrity and Performance
    If the total value of a selected applicant's currently active
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from all
Federal awarding agencies exceeds $10,000,000 for any period of time
during the period of performance of this Federal award, then the
applicant during that period of time must maintain the currency of
information reported to the System for Award Management (SAM) that is
made available in the designated integrity and performance system
(currently the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information
System (FAPIIS)) about civil, criminal, or administrative proceedings
described in paragraph 2 of this award term and condition. This is a
statutory requirement under section 872 of Public Law 110-417, as
amended (41 U.S.C. 2313). As required by section 3010 of Public Law
111-212, all information posted in the designated integrity and
performance system on or after April 15, 2011, except past performance
reviews required for Federal procurement contracts, will be publicly
available.

G. Federal Awarding Agency Contacts

    For further information concerning this notice, please contact the
Office of the Secretary via email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For other
INFRA program questions, please contact Paul Baumer at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
A TDD is available for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing at
202-366-3993. In addition,

up to the application deadline, the Department will post answers to
common questions and requests for clarifications on USDOT's website at
https://www.transportation.gov/buildamerica/INFRAgrants. To ensure
applicants receive accurate information about eligibility or the
program, the applicant is encouraged to contact USDOT directly, rather
than through intermediaries or third parties, with questions. DOT staff
may also conduct briefings on the INFRA Transportation grant selection
and award process upon request.

H. Other Information

1. Protection of Confidential Business Information

    All information submitted as part of, or in support of, any
application shall use publicly available data or data that can be made
public and methodologies that are accepted by industry practice and
standards, to the extent possible. If the application includes
information the applicant considers to be a trade secret or
confidential commercial or financial information, the applicant should
do the following: (1) Note on the front cover that the submission
``Contains Confidential Business Information (CBI)''; (2) mark each
affected page ``CBI''; and (3) highlight or otherwise denote the CBI
portions.
    The Department protects such information from disclosure to the
extent allowed under applicable law. In the event the Department
receives a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for the
information, USDOT will follow the procedures described in its FOIA
regulations at 49 CFR 7.17. Only information that is ultimately
determined to be confidential under that procedure will be exempt from
disclosure under FOIA.

2. Publication of Application Information

    Following the completion of the selection process and announcement
of awards, the Department intends to publish a list of all applications
received along with the names of the applicant organizations and
funding amounts requested. Except for the information properly marked
as described in Section H.1., the Department may make application
narratives publicly available or share application information within
the Department or with other Federal agencies if the Department
determines that sharing is relevant to the respective program's
objectives.

3. Department Feedback on Applications

    The Department strives to provide as much information as possible
to assist applicants with the application process. The Department will
not review applications in advance, but Department staff are available
for technical questions and assistance. To efficiently use Department
resources, the Department will prioritize interactions with applicants
who have not already received a debrief on their FY 2020 INFRA
application. Program staff will address questions to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>throughout the application period.

4. INFRA Extra, Eligibility and Designation

    Due to overwhelming demand, the Department is unable to provide an
INFRA award to every competitive project that applies. The INFRA Extra
initiative is aimed at encouraging sponsors with competitive projects
that do not receive an INFRA award to consider applying for TIFIA
credit assistance.
    Projects for which an INFRA application is advanced by the Senior
Review Team on the List of Projects for Consideration, but that are not
awarded, are automatically designated INFRA Extra Projects, unless the
Department determines that they are not reasonably likely to satisfy
the TIFIA project type (23 U.S.C. 601(a)(12)) and project size (23
U.S.C. 602(a)(5)) eligibilities. This is a novel designation that
provides the sponsors of these projects the opportunity to apply for
TIFIA credit assistance for up to 49% of eligible project costs. Under
current policy, TIFIA credit assistance is limited to 33% of eligible
project costs unless the applicant provides strong rationale for
requiring additional assistance. Projects for which an INFRA
application is advanced by the Senior Review Team on the List of
Projects for Consideration, but that are not awarded, are automatically
deemed to have demonstrated a strong rationale for such additional
assistance.
    Projects designated as INFRA Extra Projects will be announced by
the Secretary after INFRA award announcements are made.
    For further information about the TIFIA program in general,
including details about the types of credit assistance available,
eligibility requirements and the creditworthiness review process,
please refer to the Build America Bureau Credit Programs Guide,
available on the Build America Bureau website: https://www.transportation.gov/buildamerica/financing/program-guide.
    Disclaimer: An INFRA Extra Project designation does not guarantee
that an applicant will receive TIFIA credit assistance nor does it
guarantee that any award of TIFIA credit assistance will be equal to
49% of eligible project costs. Receipt of TIFIA credit assistance is
contingent on the applicant's ability to satisfy applicable
creditworthiness standards and other Federal requirements.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 22, 2021.
Peter Paul Montgomery Buttigieg,
Secretary of Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2021-03885 Filed 2-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10974-10978]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03924]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0100; Product Identifier 2020-NM-016-AD; Amendment
39-19845; AD 2020-03-21]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc, Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-1A10 and BD-700-1A11 airplanes.
This AD was prompted by reports that main landing gear (MLG) trailing
arm assemblies were found with compromised paint finish and corrosion
on the axle bore inner diameters due to improper removal of
contaminants during manufacturing. This AD requires a one-time
inspection to determine if an affected MLG trailing arm assembly is
installed, repetitive detailed inspections of the inner diameter of the
affected MLG trailing arm assembly axle bore for surface finish
discrepancies, corrective actions if necessary, and eventual
replacement of primer and paint and application of corrosion preventive
compound on the inner diameter of all affected MLG trailing arm
assembly axle bores, which terminates the repetitive inspections. The
FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective March 12, 2020.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of March 12,
2020.
    The FAA must receive comments on this AD by April 13, 2020.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this final rule, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet http://www.bombardier.com. You
may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It
is also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0100.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0100; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
is listed above. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darren Gassetto, Aerospace Engineer,
Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services Section, FAA, New York
ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian AD CF-2019-33R1, dated
January 23, 2020 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-1A10 and BD-700-
1A11 airplanes. You may examine the MCAI on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0100.
    This AD was prompted by reports that MLG trailing arm assemblies
were found with compromised paint finish and corrosion on the axle bore
inner diameters due to improper removal of contaminants during
manufacturing. The FAA is issuing this AD to address possible corrosion
on the inner diameter of the MLG trailing arm assembly bore, which, if
not detected and corrected, could lead to MLG collapse. See the MCAI
for additional background information.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Bombardier has issued the following service information.
     Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-1A11-32-026, Revision 01,
dated November 27, 2019.
     Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-32-039, Revision 01, dated
November 27, 2019.
     Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-32-5016, Revision 01,
dated November 27, 2019.
     Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-32-6016, Revision 01,
dated November 27, 2019.
    This service information describes procedures for a one-time
inspection to determine if an affected MLG trailing arm assembly is
installed, repetitive detailed inspections of the inner diameter of the
affected MLG trailing arm assembly axle bore for surface finish
discrepancies, corrective actions if necessary, and eventual
replacement of primer and paint and application of corrosion preventive
compound on the inner diameter of all affected MLG trailing arm
assembly axle bores, which terminates the repetitive inspections.
Surface finish discrepancies include corrosion, paint that is bubbling,
loose, flaking, cracked, damaged or missing, or primer or metallic-
ceramic coating that is visible. Corrective actions include repair or
replacement of the MLG trailing arm assembly. These documents are
distinct since they apply to different airplane models and
configurations. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to a bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, the FAA
has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. The FAA is issuing this AD
because the agency evaluated all pertinent information and determined
the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.

Requirements of This AD

    This AD requires accomplishing the actions specified in the service
information described previously, except as discussed under
``Differences Between this AD and the MCAI or Service Information.''
This AD also requires sending the inspection results to Bombardier.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    The MCAI specifies to accomplish the one-time inspection to
determine if an affected MLG trailing arm assembly is installed within
3 months from November 27, 2019 (the release date of Revision 01 of the
applicable service information specified in the Related Service
Information under 1 CFR part 51 paragraph of this AD). The FAA has
determined that a compliance time of within 30 days after the effective
date of this AD is acceptable to address the unsafe condition.

Explanation of Compliance Time

    Most ADs adopt a compliance time relative to the AD's effective
date. In this case, however, the FAA is using a fixed compliance date
in this AD. The MCAI requires operators to accomplish a detailed
inspection of the surface finish of affected MLG trailing arm
assemblies at a specified time (which varies according to serial
number, with the earliest date being 5/12/2020). That compliance time
is necessary to address the unsafe condition and is based on risk
analysis requirements, including reports of compromised paint finish
and corrosion on the axle bore inner diameters. To support this risk
analysis and to provide for coordinated implementation of TCCA's
regulations in paragraph (i) of this AD, the FAA is using the same
compliance dates in this AD.

FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD without providing an opportunity for public comments prior to
adoption. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public
justifies waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule
because the affected trailing arm assemblies have the potential for
improper adhesion between the anti-corrosion layers, which could lead
to corrosion on the inner diameter of the MLG trailing arm assembly
axle bore and possibly lead to MLG collapse. Therefore, the FAA finds
good cause that notice and opportunity for prior public comment are
impracticable. In addition, for the reasons stated above, the FAA finds
that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than
30 days.

Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    The requirements of the RFA do not apply when an agency finds good
cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt a rule without prior notice and
comment. Because the FAA has determined that it has good cause to adopt
this rule without notice and comment, RFA analysis is not required.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and the FAA did not precede it by notice and opportunity for
public comment. The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data,
views, or arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2020-0100;
Product Identifier 2020-NM-016-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
The FAA specifically invites comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. The FAA will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
AD based on those comments.
    The FAA will post all comments received, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.
The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 49 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Labor cost                      Parts cost            Cost per product      Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to 33 work-hours x $85 per hour =   Up to $200,000.........  Up to $202,805.........  Up to $9,937,445.
 Up to $2,805.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition actions that would be required based on the results of any
required actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these on-condition actions:

                Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Labor cost                 Parts cost       Cost per product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to 20 work-hours x $85 per     Up to $200,000....  Up to $201,700.
 hour = Up to $1,700.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Table does not include estimated costs for reporting.

    We estimate that it takes about 1 work-hour per product to comply
with the on-condition reporting requirement in this AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of reporting the inspection results on U.S. operators to be $85
per product.
    According to the manufacturer, some or all of the costs of this AD
may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. The FAA does not control warranty coverage for
affected individuals. As a result, the FAA has included all known costs
in the cost estimate.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid

OMB control number. The control number for the collection of
information required by this AD is 2120-0056. The paperwork cost
associated with this AD has been detailed in the Costs of Compliance
section of this document and includes time for reviewing instructions,
as well as completing and reviewing the collection of information.
Therefore, all reporting associated with this AD is mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the
burden should be directed to Information Collection Clearance Officer,
Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177-1524.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA has determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866, and
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2020-03-21 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-19845; Docket No. FAA-
2020-0100; Product Identifier 2020-NM-016-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective March 12, 2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-1A10 and BD-
700-1A11 airplanes, certificated in any category, serial numbers
9001 through 9879 inclusive and 9998 and serial numbers 60001 and
subsequent.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Landing
gear.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports that main landing gear (MLG)
trailing arm assemblies were found with compromised paint finish and
corrosion on the axle bore inner diameters due to improper removal
of contaminants during manufacturing. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address possible corrosion on the inner diameter of the MLG trailing
arm assembly axle bore, which, if not detected and corrected, could
lead to MLG collapse.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Definition

    For the purposes of this AD, an affected MLG trailing arm
assembly is a MLG trailing arm assembly with part number 21410-107
and a serial number listed in Appendix 4, Table 1 of the applicable
Bombardier service information specified in figure 1 to paragraphs
(g) through (k) and (m) of this AD.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR26FE20.008

(h) Inspection To Determine Affected MLG Trailing Arm Assembly

    For airplanes having serial numbers 9001 through 9879 inclusive
and 9998: Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD:
Inspect the right hand and left hand MLG trailing arm assemblies to
determine if an affected MLG trailing arm assembly is installed, in
accordance with Part A of the Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service information specified in figure 1 to paragraphs
(g) through (k) and (m) of this AD. A review of airplane maintenance
records is acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the part number
and serial number of the MLG trailing arm assembly can be
conclusively determined from that review.

(i) Initial Inspection of the MLG Trailing Arm Assembly Surface Finish

    If, during the inspection or review required by paragraph (h) of
this AD, it is determined that an affected MLG trailing arm assembly
is installed: Before the applicable ``1st Inspection Due by Date
(MM/DD/YY)'' listed for each affected MLG trailing arm assembly
serial number in Appendix 4, Table 1 of the applicable Bombardier
service information specified in figure 1 to paragraphs (g) through
(k) and (m) of this AD, for each affected MLG trailing arm assembly,
do a detailed inspection for surface finish discrepancies on the
inner diameter of the affected MLG trailing arm assembly axle bore,
and, before further flight, do all corrective actions as applicable,
in accordance with Part B of the Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service information specified in figure 1 to paragraphs
(g) through (k) and (m) of this AD. For airplanes on which the
actions required by paragraph (k) of this AD are done on all
affected MLG trailing arm assemblies, no action is required by this
paragraph.

(j) Repeat Inspection

    For any affected MLG trailing arm assembly on which the
inspection required by paragraph (i) of this AD has been
accomplished: Within 33 months from the completion of the initial
inspection as required by paragraph (i) of this AD, do a detailed
inspection of the affected MLG trailing arm assembly for surface
finish discrepancies on the inner diameter of the affected MLG
trailing arm assembly axle bore, and, before further flight, do all
corrective actions as applicable, in accordance with Part C, and
Part B as applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service information specified in figure 1 to paragraphs
(g) through (k) and (m) of this AD. For airplanes on which the
actions required by paragraph (k) of this AD are done on all
affected MLG trailing arm assemblies, no action is required by this
paragraph.

(k) Terminating Action

    For airplanes having serial numbers 9001 through 9879 inclusive
and 9998: Within 120 months of each affected MLG trailing arm
assembly entry into service, or within 5 days after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later, replace the primer and
paint and apply the corrosion preventive compound on the inner
diameter of the axle bore on all affected MLG trailing arm
assemblies, in accordance with Part D of the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service information specified in
figure 1 to paragraphs (g) through (k) and (m) of this AD. This
constitutes terminating action for the requirements of paragraphs
(i) and (j) of this AD.

(l) Parts Installation Limitation

    For all airplanes: As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install an affected MLG trailing arm assembly as a
replacement part on any airplane, unless that affected MLG trailing
arm assembly is marked ``SB700-32-041ABC'' on the MLG trailing arm
assembly modification plate and near the part number.

(m) Reporting Requirement

    At the applicable time specified in paragraph (m)(1) or (2) of
this AD, submit a report of positive findings of the inspections
required by paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD. Submit the report to
Bombardier in accordance with the applicable service information
specified in figure 1 to paragraphs (g) through (k) and (m) of this
AD. If operators have reported findings as part of obtaining any
corrective actions approved by Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design
Approval Organization (DAO), they are not required to report those
findings as specified in this paragraph.
    (1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 10 days after the inspection.
    (2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this
AD: Submit the report within 10 days after the effective date of
this AD.

(n) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (h) through (k), if those actions were performed before
the effective date of this AD using the applicable service
information specified in figure 2 to paragraph (n) of this AD.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR26FE20.009

(o) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a

principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards
district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a
person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 1
hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
All responses to this collection of information are mandatory as
required by this AD; the nature and extent of confidentiality to be
provided, if any. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or
any other aspect of this collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden to Information Collection
Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.

(p) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian AD CF-2019-33R1, dated January 23, 2020, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2020-0100.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Darren Gassetto,
Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services
Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (3) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (q)(3) and (4) of this AD.

(q) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-1A11-32-026, Revision 01,
dated November 27, 2019.
    (ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-32-039, Revision 01, dated
November 27, 2019.
    (iii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-32-5016, Revision 01,
dated November 27, 2019.
    (iv) Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-32-6016, Revision 01, dated
November 27, 2019.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet http://www.bombardier.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.htm.

    Issued on February 14, 2020.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-03924 Filed 2-24-20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 197 (Friday, October 9, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64137-64138]
[FR Doc No: 2020-22451]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: CP20-530-000.
    Applicants: Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Application for Authorization of Abandonment for Rate
Schedules X-70 and X-233 of Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Filed Date: 9/29/20.
    Accession Number: 20200929-5101.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/20/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-33-000.
    Applicants: Rover Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Summary of Negotiated Rate
Capacity Release Agreements on 10-2-20 to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 10/2/20.
    Accession Number: 20201002-5009.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/14/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-34-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Request for Limited Waiver of Transcontinental Gas
Pipe Line Company, LLC under RP21-34.
    Filed Date: 10/1/20.
    Accession Number: 20201001-5329.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/13/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-35-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt (Aethon
United 52454 to Scona 53157) to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 10/2/20.
    Accession Number: 20201002-5102.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/14/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-36-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company, Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC,
Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Joint Petition for Limited Waiver, et al. of ANR
Pipeline Company, et al. under RP21-36.
    Filed Date: 10/2/20.
    Accession Number: 20201002-5198.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/14/20.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/

fercgensearch.asp) by querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered,
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 5, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-22451 Filed 10-8-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 38794]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13809]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-561, OMB Control No. 3235-0747]

Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension: Rule 607

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the
collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to
submit this existing collection of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension and approval.
    Regulation E (17 CFR 230.601 to 230.610a) exempts from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) (``Securities
Act'') securities issued by a small business investment company
(``SBIC'') which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940
(15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.) (``Investment Company Act'') or a closed-end
investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business
development company (``BDC'') under the Investment Company Act, so long
as the aggregate offering price of all securities of the issuer that
may be sold within a 12-month period does not exceed $5,000,000 and
certain other conditions are met. Rule 607 under Regulation E (17 CFR
230.607) entitled, ``Sales material to be filed,'' requires sales
material used in connection with securities offerings under Regulation
E to be filed with the Commission at least five days (excluding
weekends and holidays) prior to its use.\1\ Commission staff reviews
sales material filed under rule 607 for materially misleading
statements and omissions. The requirements of rule 607 are designed to
protect investors from the use of false or misleading sales material in
connection with Regulation E offerings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Sales material includes advertisements, articles or other
communications to be published in newspapers, magazines, or other
periodicals; radio and television scripts; and letters, circulars or
other written communications proposed to be sent given or otherwise
communicated to more than ten persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Respondents to this collection of information include SBICs and
BDCs making an offering of securities pursuant to Regulation E. No
filings were submitted to the Commission under rule 607 in 2019, 2020,
or 2021. Accordingly, we estimate no annual responses. Each
respondent's reporting burden under rule 607 relates to the internal
burden associated with filing its sales material electronically, which
is negligible. For administrative purposes, we estimate an annual
burden of one hour. The estimate of average burden hours is made solely
for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act and is not derived from a
quantitative, comprehensive, or even representative survey or study of
the burdens associated with Commission rules and forms.
    The requirements of this collection of information are mandatory.
Responses will not be kept confidential. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid control number.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
estimate of the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted by August 29, 2022.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: David Bottom, Acting
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549 or send an
email to: [email protected].

    Dated: June 23, 2022.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-13809 Filed 6-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: November 17, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 222)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 67728-67730]
[DOCID:fr17no08-9]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30637; Amdt. No. 3295]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective November 17, 2008. The compliance date
for each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of November 17, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_
federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability--All SIAPs are available online free of charge. Visit
http://nfdc.faa.gov to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and
Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harry J. Hodges, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS-420) Flight Technologies and Programs Division,
Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) by amending the referenced SIAPs.
The complete regulatory description of each SIAP is listed on the
appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the National Flight Data
Center (FDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P-NOTAM), and is incorporated
by reference in the amendment under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and
Sec.  97.20 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the need for a
special format make their verbatim publication in the Federal Register
expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use the regulatory
text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction on charts
printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP contained in FAA form documents is
unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR sections and
specifies the types of SIAP and the corresponding effective dates. This
amendment also identifies the airport and its location, the procedure
and the amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP as amended in the transmittal. For safety and
timeliness of change considerations, this amendment incorporates only
specific changes contained for each SIAP as modified by FDC/P-NOTAMs.
    The SIAPs, as modified by FDC P-NOTAM, and contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these changes to
SIAPs, the TERPS criteria were applied only to specific conditions
existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in this rule
have been previously issued by the FAA in a FDC NOTAM as an emergency
action of immediate flight safety relating directly to published
aeronautical charts. The circumstances which created the need for all
these SIAP amendments requires making them effective in less than 30
days.
    Because of the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs
and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and public procedure
before adopting these SIAPs are impracticable and contrary to the
public interest and, where applicable, that good cause exists for
making these SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under DOT
Regulatory Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air Traffic Control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (Air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 31, 2008.
James J. Ballough,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14, Code
of Federal regulations, Part 97, 14 CFR part 97, is amended by amending
Standard Instrument Approach Procedures,

effective at 0901 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

Sec. Sec.  97.23, 97.25, 97.27, 97.29, 97.31, 97.33, and
97.35  [Amended].

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:
    By amending: Sec.  97.23 VOR, VOR/DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or
TACAN; Sec.  97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; Sec.
97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; Sec.  97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, ISMLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
Sec.  97.31 RADAR SIAPs; Sec.  97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and Sec.  97.35 COPTER
SIAPs, Identified as follows:

* * * Effective Upon Publication

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        FDC date               State                 City                   Airport           FDC No.                        Subject
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10/15/08...............  KY                 FRANKFORT.............  CAPITAL CITY..........       8/4014  RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, AMDT 1.
10/15/08...............  KY                 FRANKFORT.............  CAPITAL CITY..........       8/4015  LOC RWY 24, AMDT 2.
10/22/08...............  CO                 GUNNISON..............  GUNNISON-CRESTED BUTTE       8/4212  GPS B, ORIG.
                                                                     REGIONAL.
10/22/08...............  CO                 GUNNISON..............  GUNNISON-CRESTED BUTTE       8/4213  VOR OR GPS A, AMDT 3B.
                                                                     REGIONAL.
10/17/08...............  SC                 HARTSVILLE............  HARTSVILLE REGIONAL...       8/4646  NDB RWY 3, ORIG.
10/17/08...............  SC                 HARTSVILLE............  HARTSVILLE REGIONAL...       8/4647  NDB RWY 21, ORIG.
10/17/08...............  SC                 HARTSVILLE............  HARTSVILLE REGIONAL...       8/4649  GPS RWY 3, ORIG.
10/17/08...............  SC                 HARTSVILLE............  HARTSVILLE REGIONAL...       8/4654  GPS RWY 21, ORIG.
08/25/08...............  AK                 BARTER ISLAND.........  BARTER ISLAND LRRS....       8/4744  RNAV (GPS) RWY 25, ORIG.
08/25/08...............  AK                 BARTER ISLAND.........  BARTER ISLAND LRRS....       8/4745  RNAV (GPS) RWY 7, ORIG.
10/20/08...............  IL                 CHICAGO/ROCKFORD......  CHICAGO/ROCKFORD INTL.       8/4913  LOC BC RWY 19, AMDT 15A.
10/20/08...............  IL                 CHICAGO/ROCKFORD......  CHICAGO/ROCKFORD INTL.       8/4924  ILS OR LOC RWY 1, AMDT 28B.
10/20/08...............  CQ                 TINIAN ISLAND/N         TINIAN INTL...........       8/4983  NDB-A, AMDT 1B.
                                             MARIANA ISLAND.
10/21/08...............  CO                 GUNNISON..............  GUNNISON-CRESTED BUTTE       8/5219  GPS B, ORIG.
                                                                     REGIONAL.
10/21/08...............  CO                 GUNNISON..............  GUNNISON-CRESTED BUTTE       8/5220  VOR OR GPS A, AMDT 7B.
                                                                     REGIONAL.
10/21/08...............  MN                 MINNEAPOLIS...........  MINNEAPOLIS-ST PAUL          8/5234  CONVERGING ILS RWY 35, AMDT 1.
                                                                     INTL/WOLD-CHAMBERLAIN.
10/21/08...............  MN                 MINNEAPOLIS...........  MINNEAPOLIS-ST PAUL          8/5240  RNAV (GPS) RWY 30R, AMDT 1.
                                                                     INTL/WOLD-CHAMBERLAIN.
10/22/08...............  NC                 STATESVILLE...........  STATESVILLE REGIONAL..       8/5501  ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 28, ORIG-A.
10/22/08...............  CO                 COLORADO SPRINGS......  CITY OF COLORADO             8/5547  NDB RWY 35L, AMDT 25B.
                                                                     SPRINGS MUNI.
10/22/08...............  CO                 COLORADO SPRINGS......  CITY OF COLORADO             8/5548  ILS OR LOC RWY 35R, ORIG.
                                                                     SPRINGS MUNI.
10/22/08...............  CO                 COLORADO SPRINGS......  CITY OF COLORADO             8/5549  ILS OR LOC RWY 17L, ORIG-A.
                                                                     SPRINGS MUNI.
10/22/08...............  CO                 COLORADO SPRINGS......  CITY OF COLORADO             8/5550  ILS RWY 35L, AMDT 36A.
                                                                     SPRINGS MUNI.
10/23/08...............  OH                 CINCINNATI............  CINCINNATI MUNI              8/5849  RNAV (GPS) RWY 25, ORIG.
                                                                     AIRPORT-LUNKEN FIELD.
10/23/08...............  AR                 MENA..................  MENA INTERMOUNTAIN           8/5860  ILS OR LOC RWY 27, AMDT 1.
                                                                     MUNI.
10/23/08...............  MI                 KALAMAZOO.............  KALAMAZOO/BATTLE CREEK       8/5861  VOR RWY 17, AMDT 18.
                                                                     INTL.
10/23/08...............  NM                 SILVER CITY...........  GRANT COUNTY..........       8/5914  LOC/DME RWY 26, AMDT 5.
10/23/08...............  LA.                PATTERSON.............  HARRY P WILLIAMS             8/5947  VOR/DME A, AMDT 10A.
                                                                     MEMORIAL.
10/23/08...............  SC                 HARTSVILLE............  HARTSVILLE REGIONAL...       8/5987  GPS RWY 3, ORIG.
10/24/08...............  PA                 HARRISBURG............  HARRISBURG INTL.......       8/6092  ILS RWY 31, AMDT 1.
10/24/08...............  MN                 GRAND MARAIS..........  GRAND MARAIS/COOK            8/6116  NDB RWY 27, ORIG-A.
                                                                     COUNTY.
10/24/08...............  IA                 PERRY.................  PERRY MUNI............       8/6135  NDB RWY 14, AMDT 2A.
10/24/08...............  IA                 PERRY.................  PERRY MUNI............       8/6136  GPS RWY 14, ORIG-A.
10/24/08...............  IA                 PERRY.................  PERRY MUNI............       8/6137  NDB RWY 32, AMDT 5A.
10/24/08...............  TN                 TULLAHOMA.............  TULLAHOMA REGIONAL/WM        8/6165  RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, ORIG-A.
                                                                     NORTHERN FLD.
10/24/08...............  OR                 PORTLAND..............  PORTLAND INTL.........       8/6260  VOR/DME RWY 21, ORIG-C.
10/24/08...............  MI                 KALAMAZOO.............  KALAMAZOO/BATTLE CREEK       8/6281  GPS RWY 5, ORIG.
                                                                     INTL.
10/29/08...............  CA                 LONG BEACH............  LONG BEACH/DAUGHERTY         8/6395  ILS OR LOC RWY 30, AMDT 32C.
                                                                     FIELD.
10/28/08...............  FL                 LAKELAND..............  LAKELAND LINDER              8/6567  NDB RWY 5, AMDT 4.
                                                                     REGIONAL.
09/18/08...............  TX                 DALLAS................  DALLAS LOVE FIELD.....       8/7951  ILS OR LOC RWY 31L, AMDT 21.
09/30/08...............  MA                 BOSTON................  GEN EDWARD LAWRENCE          8/9727  RNAV (GPS) RWY 33L, ORIG-A.
                                                                     LOGAN INTL.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. E8-26843 Filed 11-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P