[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 226 (Friday, November 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 70093]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28133]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee--Closed
Session

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee
Special Closed Session.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App. 2), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), notice is
hereby given of a special closed session of the Commercial Space
Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC). The special closed session
will be an administrative session for the Committee members to review
the provisions of the COMSTAC Charter; the Federal Advisory Committee
Act (FACA); 41 CFR, Parts 101-6 and 102-3; and the Department of
Transportation and FAA Orders concerning advisory committee management.
The meeting will take place on Wednesday, December 11, 2013, at the
National Housing Center, 1201 15th Street NW., Washington, DC 20005,
from 2:00 p.m. until 3:00 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Scott (AST-3), Office of
Commercial Space Transportation (AST), 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Room 331, Washington, DC 20591, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Issued in Washington, DC, November 15, 2013.
George C. Nield,
Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2013-28133 Filed 11-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: February 21, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 34)]
[Notices]
[Page 8850-8851]
[DOCID:fr21fe06-47]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

February 13, 2006.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER00-3251-011; ER99-754-013; ER98-1734-011; ER01-
1919-008; ER99-2404-008; ER01-513-011; ER01-513-012; ER01-513-013;
ER01-513-014; ER01-513-015.
    Applicants: Exelon Generating Company, LLC; AmerGen Energy Company,
LLC; Commonwealth Edison Company; Exelon Energy Company; Exelon New
England Power Marketing, L.P.; Exelon Edgar, LLC; Exelon West Medway,
LLC; Exelon Wyman, LLC; Exelon New Boston, LLC Exelon Framingham, LLC.
    Description: Exelon Generation Co. LLC et al. submits revised
tariff sheets to correct the error noted in its 1/19/06 filing as part
of the market-based rate.
    Filed Date: 02/06/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060208-0314.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, February 21, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1249-002.
    Applicants: Granite State Electric Company et al.
    Description: Granite State Electric Co. d/b/a National Grid submits
its refund compliance report two business days out of time.
    Filed Date: 02/06/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060206-5053.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 27, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-185-001.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: New York Independent System Operator, Inc. submits
requested information pertaining to its 11/08/05 filing and requests
privileged and confidential treatment to the data.
    Filed Date: 02/06/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060208-0243.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 27, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-380-001; ER06-381-001; ER06-382-001; ER06-383-
001; ER06-388-001; ER06-389-001; ER06-390-001; ER06-391-001; ER06-392-
001; ER06-393-001; ER06-394-001; ER06-395-001.
    Applicants: Kentucky Utilities Company.
    Description: Kentucky Utilities Co.'s submits informational
supplement to its 12/23/05 filing.
    Filed Date: 02/03/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060213-0007.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 24, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-429-002.
    Applicants: Florida Power Corporation.
    Description: Florida Power Corp. dba Progress Energy Florida, Inc.
submits corrected sheet in compliance with Orders 661 and 661-A, issued
6/2/05.
    Filed Date: 02/06/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060208-0276.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 27, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-430-002.
    Applicants: Progress Energy Services Company, LLC.
    Description: Progress Energy Service Co., LLC on behalf of Carolina
Power & Light Co. dba Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. submits a
corrected tariff sheet to its FERC Electric Tariff, Third Revised
Volume No. 3.
    Filed Date: 02/06/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060210-0027.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 27, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-611-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: PJM Interconnection LLC submits an interconnection
service agreement among PJM, Southeastern Chester County Refuse
Authority and PECO Energy Co.
    Filed Date: 02/06/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060208-0170.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 27, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-612-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Co. submits a Letter
Agreement with Garnet Energy Corporation.
    Filed Date: 02/06/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060208-0172.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 27, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-613-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England In.c et al. submits a package of
market improvements that have been developed as Phase II of the
Ancillary Service Market Project.
    Filed Date: 02/06/2006.
    Accession Number: 20060208-0386.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 27, 2006.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov.
 To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-2380 Filed 2-17-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 3 (Thursday, January 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 893-894]
[FR Doc No: 2022-28600]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-382, OMB Control No. 3235-0435]

Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension: Customer Account
Statements

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (``PRA''), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing
collection of information provided for in Rule 607 (17 CFR 242.607)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 U.S.C. 78a et seq.)
(``Exchange Act''). The Commission plans to submit this existing
collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget)
(``OMB'') for extension and approval.
    Rule 607 requires disclosure on each new account and on a yearly
basis thereafter, on the annual statement, the firm's policies
regarding receipt of payment for order flow from any market makers,
exchanges or exchange members to which it routes customers' order in
national market system securities for execution; and

information regarding the aggregate amount of monetary payments,
discounts, rebates or reduction in fees received by the firm over the
past year.
    The information collected pursuant to Rule 607 is necessary to
facilitate the establishment of a national market system for
securities. The purpose of the rule is to ensure that customers are
adequately apprised of the broker-dealer's order routing practices with
respect to the customer's order, in furtherance of the Commission's
statutory mandate to protect investors.
    The Commission estimates that approximately 3,643 respondents will
make the third-party disclosures required in the collection of
information requirements to 183,511,801 customer accounts each year.
The Commission estimates that the average number of hours necessary for
each respondent to comply with Rule 607 per year is 39.714 hours, which
results in an average aggregated annual burden of 144,678.102 hours.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing by March 6, 2023.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: David Bottom, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o John
Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to:
[email protected].

    Dated: December 29, 2022.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-28600 Filed 1-4-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73364-73365]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28873]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73735; File No. SR-FICC-2014-07]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation;
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Clearing Rules of the
Mortgage-Backed Securities Division To Establish a Membership Category
and Minimum Financial Requirements for Insured Credit Unions

December 4, 2014.

I. Introduction

    On October 15, 2014, the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation
(``FICC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') proposed rule change SR-FICC-2014-07 pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\2\ The proposed rule change was published
for comment in the Federal Register on October 24, 2014.\3\ The
Commission received no comment letters in response to the proposed rule
change. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is approving
the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73391 (October 20,
2014), 79 FR 63657 (October 24, 2014) (SR-FICC-2014-07).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description

    Pursuant to this filing, FICC proposed to amend the clearing rules
of the Mortgage-Backed Securities Division (``MBSD'') of FICC in order
to establish a membership category and minimum financial requirements
for ``insured credit unions,'' as such term is defined in the Federal
Credit Union Act (``FCUA'').\4\ Specifically, FICC proposed to revise
MBSD Rule 2A, Section 1, to create a membership category for insured
credit unions that are in good standing with their primary regulators
(``Insured Credit Union Clearing Member''). For loss allocation
purposes, Insured Credit Union Clearing Members would be designated as
``Tier One Clearing Members'' in accordance with MBSD Rule 4, Section
7. In addition, FICC has proposed to add a provision to MBSD Rule 2A,
Section 2, which would require an applicant applying to become an
Insured Credit Union Clearing Member to have a level of equity capital
as of the end of the month prior to the effective date of their
membership of at least $100 million and achieve the ``well
capitalized'' statutory net worth category classification defined by
the National Credit Union Administration (``NCUA'') under 12 CFR part
702.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The FCUA defines ``Insured credit unions'' as ``any credit
union the member accounts of which are insured in accordance with
the provisions of Title II of [FCUA] . . .'' According to FICC, the
term ``insured credit union'' includes all credit unions chartered
by the National Credit Union Administration (``NCUA''), the
independent federal agency that regulates charters and supervises
federal credit unions, because Title II of the FCUA requires all
credit unions that are chartered by the NCUA to have insured
accounts. Furthermore, FICC has stated that the term ``insured
credit unions'' also includes both federally-insured state credit
unions and federally-insured credit unions operating under the
jurisdiction of the Department of Defense because Title II of the
FCUA permits the NCUA Board to insure those types of credit unions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Insured credit unions applying for membership under this new
category would be required to meet all other applicable financial,
credit, and operational membership qualifications and standards for
clearing members that are contained in MBSD Rule 2A, Section 2. In
particular, such applicants would have to demonstrate an established
profitable business history of a minimum of 6 months or personnel with
sufficient operational background and business experience for the firm
to conduct its business and to be a member (as is required of all other
membership categories). Insured credit unions seeking membership would
have to demonstrate an ability to communicate with FICC, fulfill
anticipated commitments to and meet the operational requirements of
FICC with necessary promptness and accuracy, and conform to any
condition and requirement that FICC reasonably deems necessary for its
protection or that of its Members.
    FICC believes the participation of insured credit unions as
guaranteed service members will contribute to the safety, efficiency,
and transparency of the market by allowing FICC to capture a greater
part of the activity of its existing members and by introducing
activity of current non-members to FICC. FICC also believes that
insured credit unions will benefit from the MBSD clearing service and
the associated operational efficiencies of a central counterparty
service.

III. Discussion

    Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act \5\ directs the Commission to
approve a self-regulatory organization's proposed rule change if the
Commission finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to such organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \6\
requires, among other things, that the rules of a clearing agency are
designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that, as proposed, FICC's rule change to
establish a membership category and minimum financial, credit, and
operational requirements and standards for insured credit unions, as
defined in FICC's proposal, is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of
the Act.\7\ The Commissions believes that the proposed rule change
should promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions, because by allowing insured credit unions to
participate as MBSD members, these firms will be able to avail
themselves of the benefits of central counterparty service including,
among other things, trade comparison, to-be-announced netting,
electronic pool notification allocation, pool comparison, pool netting,
settlement, and risk management for eligible securities. Furthermore,
the rule change will also allow existing FICC members to submit
eligible trading activity with qualified insured credit unions directly
to the MBSD of FICC, thereby also extending

the benefits of the central counterparty services to such trading
activity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission concludes that the
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act, particularly
the requirements of Section 17A of the Act,\8\ and the rules and
regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\9\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-FICC-2014-07) be and
hereby is approved.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \10\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

    For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28873 Filed 12-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<META name="generator" content="PDFCreactiveX HTML Export">
<META name="creation-date" content="09/09/2008 08:15:00 ">
<TITLE></TITLE>


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 67 (Monday, April 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17253-17255]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07133]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0618; FRL-9959-38]

Cancellation Order for Certain Pesticide Registrations and/or
Amendments To Terminate Uses

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's order for the cancellations and/or
amendments to terminate uses, voluntarily requested by the registrants
and accepted by the Agency, of products listed in Table 1 and 2 of Unit
II., pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA). This cancellation order follows a November 22, 2016
Federal Register Notice of Receipt of Requests from the registrants
listed in Table 3 of Unit II. to voluntarily cancel and/or amend to
terminate uses of these product registrations. In the November 22, 2016
notice, EPA indicated that it would issue an order implementing the
cancellations and/or amendments to terminate uses, unless the Agency
received substantive comments within the 30-day comment period that
would merit its further review of these requests, or unless the
registrants withdrew their requests. The Agency did not receive any
comments on the notice. Further, the registrants did not withdraw their
requests. Accordingly, EPA hereby issues in this notice a cancellation
order granting the requested cancellations and/or amendments to
terminate uses. Any distribution, sale, or use of the products subject
to this cancellation order is permitted only in accordance with the
terms of this order, including any existing stocks provisions.

DATES: The propoxur product cancellations are effective December 31,
2017. The remaining cancellations and/or amendments are effective April
10, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brittany Pruitt, Pesticide Re-
Evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a

wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human health, and
agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide users; and
members of the public interested in the sale, distribution, or use of
pesticides. Since others also may be interested, the Agency has not
attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be affected by
this action.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The docket for this action, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0618, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. What action is the agency taking?

    This notice announces the cancellations and/or amendments to
terminate uses, as requested by registrants, of products registered
under FIFRA section 3 (7 U.S.C. 136a). These registrations are listed
in sequence by registration number in Tables 1 and 2 of this unit.

     Table 1--Dimethomorph, Metiram, Profenofos, Propoxur and Sodium
                    Acifluorfen Product Cancellations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         EPA registration No.                     Product name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4-433.................................  Bonide Kleen Up Grass and Weed
                                         Killer, Ready to Use.
100-598...............................  Profenofos Technical.
100-699...............................  Curacron 8E.
279-3395..............................  CB Invader with Propoxur.
241-383...............................  Acrobat MZ Fungicide.
241-395...............................  Acrobat MZ WDG Fungicide.
241-410...............................  Acrobat 50 WP Fungicide.
241-411...............................  Stature MZ Fungicide.
241-419...............................  Stature DM Fungicide.
3862-135..............................  Drop Dead.
6218-24...............................  Permacide Plus.
7969-105..............................  Polyram 80 DF.
7969-321..............................  Cabrio Plus Fungicide.
11556-33..............................  Sendran Technical.
89459-39..............................  Prentox Prenbay 1.5 BC.
89459-28..............................  Prentox Prenbay 1% Oil.
FL980001..............................  Polyram 80 DF.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Table 2--Captan and Propoxur Product Registration Amendments To Terminate Uses
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        EPA registration No.                          Product name                        Uses terminated
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
42750-230...........................  Captan Technical...........................  Turf (golf courses and sod
                                                                                farms), seed beds and
                                                                                greenhouse bench treatment.
42750-231...........................  Captan 80 DF...............................  Dichondra, turf grasses (golf
                                                                                courses, ornamental in non-
                                                                                pastured areas only),
                                                                                grasses (lawn seedbeds),
                                                                                turf (sod farms).
42750-235...........................  Captan 50% WP..............................  Dichondra, turf grasses
                                                                                (ornamentals in non-pastured
                                                                                areas only), grasses (lawn
                                                                                seedbeds).
42750-236...........................  Captan 39.75% FL...........................  Dichondra, turf grasses
                                                                                (ornamental in non-pastured
                                                                                areas only), grasses (lawn
                                                                                seed beds).
84396-12............................  Sungro Residual Spray......................  Indoor aerosol, spray, and
                                                                                liquid formulations; use in
                                                                                food handling establishments
                                                                                and indoor crack and crevice
                                                                                use.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Table 3 of this unit includes the names and addresses of record for
all registrants of the products in Tables 1 and 2 of this unit, in
sequence by EPA company number. This number corresponds to the first
part of the EPA registration numbers of the products listed above.

        Table 3--Registrants of Cancelled and/or Amended Products
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            EPA company No.                 Company name and address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.....................................  Bonide Products, Inc., 6301
                                         Sutliff Road, Oriskany, NY
                                         13424.
100...................................  Syngenta Crop Protection, P.O.
                                         Box 18300, Greensboro, NC
                                         27419.
241...................................  BASF Corporation, 29 Davis
                                         Drive, Research Triangle Park,
                                         NC 27709.
279...................................  FMC Corporation, 1735 Market
                                         Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103.
3862..................................  ABC Compounding Company, Inc.,
                                         P.O. Box 16247, Atlanta, GA
                                         30321.
6218..................................  Summit Chemical Company, 8322
                                         Sharon Drive, Frederick, MD
                                         21704.
7969..................................  BASF Corporation, P.O. Box
                                         13528, Research Triangle Park,
                                         NC 27709.
11556.................................  Bayer Healthcare, LLC, P.O. Box
                                         390, Shawnee Mission, KS 66201.
42750.................................  Albaugh LLC, P.O. Box 2127,
                                         Valdosta, GA 31604-2127.
84396.................................  Sungro Products, LLC, 810 E.
                                         18th Street, Los Angeles, CA
                                         90021.
89459.................................  Central Garden & Pet Company,
                                         1501 E. Woodfield Road, Suite
                                         200, West Schaumburg, IL 60173.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Summary of Public Comments Received and Agency Response to
Comments

    During the public comment period provided, EPA received no comments
in response to the November 22, 2016 Federal Register notice announcing
the

Agency's receipt of the requests for voluntary cancellations and/or
amendments to terminate uses of products listed in Tables 1 and 2 of
Unit II.

IV. Cancellation Order

    Pursuant to FIFRA section 6(f) (7 U.S.C. 136d(f)(1)), EPA hereby
approves the requested cancellations and/or amendments to terminate
uses of the registrations identified in Tables 1 and 2 of Unit II.
Accordingly, the Agency hereby orders that the product registrations
identified in Tables 1 and 2 of Unit II. are canceled and/or amended to
terminate the affected uses. The effective date of the propoxur product
cancellations that are subject to this notice is December 31, 2017. The
effective date of the remaining cancellations that are subject to this
notice is April 10, 2017. Any distribution, sale, or use of existing
stocks of the products identified in Tables 1 and 2 of Unit II. in a
manner inconsistent with any of the provisions for disposition of
existing stocks set forth in Unit VI. will be a violation of FIFRA.

V. What is the agency's authority for taking this action?

    Section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA (7 U.S.C. 136d(f)(1)) provides that a
registrant of a pesticide product may at any time request that any of
its pesticide registrations be canceled or amended to terminate one or
more uses. FIFRA further provides that, before acting on the request,
EPA must publish a notice of receipt of any such request in the Federal
Register. Thereafter, following the public comment period, the EPA
Administrator may approve such a request. The notice of receipt for
this action was published for comment in the Federal Register of
November 22, 2016 (81 FR 83833) (FRL-9954-80). The comment period
closed on December 22, 2016.

VI. Provisions for Disposition of Existing Stocks

    Existing stocks are those stocks of registered pesticide products
which are currently in the United States and which were packaged,
labeled, and released for shipment prior to the effective date of the
action. The existing stocks provisions for the products subject to this
order are as follows:

A. For Propoxur Products 279-3395, 3862-135, 6218-24, 11556-33, 89459-
28, 89459-39 Identified in Table 1 of Unit II.

    At the request of the registrant FMC Corporation, the effective
product cancelation date for the propoxur products listed in Table 1 of
Unit II. is December 31, 2017. The registrants may continue to sell and
distribute existing stocks of the propoxur products listed in Table 1
of Unit II. until December 31, 2017. Thereafter, registrants will be
prohibited from selling or distributing the propoxur products
identified in Table 1 of Unit II., except for export consistent with
FIFRA section 17 (7 U.S.C. 136o) or for proper disposal.
    Persons other than the registrant may sell, distribute, or use
existing stocks of the affected cancelled products until supplies are
exhausted, provided that such sale, distribution, or use is consistent
with the terms of the previously approved labeling on, or that
accompanied, the cancelled products.

B. For All Other Products Identified in Table 1 and 2 of Unit II.

    For all other voluntary product cancellations noted, the
registrants may continue to sell and distribute existing stocks of
products listed in Table 1 of Unit II. until April 10, 2018, which is 1
year after publication of this cancellation order in the Federal
Register. Thereafter, registrants are prohibited from selling or
distributing the products identified in Table 1 of Unit II., except for
export consistent with FIFRA section 17 (7 U.S.C. 136o) or for proper
disposal.
    In the case of products for which there are requested amendments to
terminate uses, once EPA has approved product labels reflecting the
requested amendments to terminate uses, the registrant will be
permitted to sell or distribute products under the previously approved
labeling for a period of 18 months after the date of Federal Register
publication of the cancellation order, unless other restrictions have
been imposed. Thereafter, the registrant will be prohibited from
selling or distributing the products whose labels include the deleted
uses identified in Table 2 of Unit II., except for export consistent
with FIFRA section 17 or for proper disposal.
    Persons other than the registrant may sell, distribute, or use
existing stocks of the affected cancelled products/products under the
previously approved labeling until supplies are exhausted, provided
that such sale, distribution, or use is consistent with the terms of
the previously approved labeling on, or that accompanied, the cancelled
products/products under the previously approved labeling.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: March 9, 2017.
Yu-Ting Guilaran,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2017-07133 Filed 4-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26833-26836]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12285]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2018 / Rules
and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0904; Product Identifier 2017-NM-071-AD; Amendment
39-19310; AD 2018-12-06]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 787-8 and 787-9 airplanes. This AD was
prompted by a report of an in-service reliability issue of a latent
flow sensor failure combined with single cabin air compressor (CAC)
operation. This condition resulted in reduced airflow which led to a
persistent single CAC surge condition that caused overheat damage to
the CAC inlet. This AD requires installing new pack control unit (PCU)
software for the cabin air conditioning and temperature control system
(CACTCS) and new CAC outlet pressure sensor J-tube hardware, and doing
related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. We are
issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective July 16, 2018.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of July 16,
2018.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. It is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0904.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0904; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Operations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allison Buss, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-
231-3564; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Boeing Model 787-8
and 787-9 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on
October 6, 2017 (82 FR 46719). The NPRM was prompted by a report of an
in-service reliability issue of a latent flow sensor failure combined
with single CAC operation. This condition resulted in reduced airflow
which led to a persistent single CAC surge condition that caused
overheat damage to the CAC inlet. The NPRM proposed to require
installing new PCU software for the CACTCS and new CAC outlet pressure
sensor J-tube hardware, and doing related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. We are issuing this AD to prevent CAC inlet
overheating leading to structural degradation of the CAC inlet, fumes
in the cabin and flight deck, and interruption to in-service air
conditioning.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.

Support for the NPRM

    A commenter, Nicholas Weber, and the Air Line Pilots Association,
International (ALPA) had no objection to the NPRM. United Airlines and
Jetstar Airways agreed with the NPRM but submitted comments, which are
addressed below.

Request to Reference Latest Service Information

    Boeing and Etihad Airways requested we refer to Boeing Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017.
Boeing stated that the NPRM refers to Boeing Service Bulletin B787-
81205-SB210077-00, Issue 003, dated October 20, 2016, and it should be
Issue 004 instead.
    We agree that this final rule should refer to the latest service
information. We have reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210077-00, Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017, which provides minor
corrections. We have determined the revised actions have no effect on
airplanes on which the earlier actions were completed. We revised the
``Related Service Information under 1 CFR part 51'' paragraph of this
final rule to refer to Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00,
Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017. We revised paragraphs (c)(2) and
(g)(1) of this AD to refer to Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210077-00, Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017. We also added
paragraph (h)(5) to this AD to provide credit for using Boeing Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 003, dated October 20, 2016, to
accomplish the required actions in paragraph (g) of this AD, provided
those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD.

Request To Allow Updated Software Version

    Jetstar Airways and United Airlines requested that paragraph (g) of
the proposed AD be updated to allow for compliance to also be met by
installing

the newer PCU Y-103 (software part number (P/N) HAM56-21PC-1030)
software per Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210083-00, Issue 001,
dated February 9, 2017. Jetstar Airways stated that since the release
of Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 003, dated
March 29, 2017; and Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00,
Issue 003, dated October 20, 2016; which describe procedures for
installation of PCU Y-102 (software P/N HAM57-21PC-1020) software via
Work Package 1, there has been new PCU Y-103 software released per
Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210083-00, Issue 001, dated
February 9, 2017. Jetstar stated its understanding that Work Packages 2
and 3 of Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 003,
dated March 29, 2017; or Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-
00, Issue 003, dated October 20, 2016; must also be done in order to
meet compliance with the proposed AD.
    We agree because we reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210083-00, Issue 001, dated February 9, 2017, and we have determined
that compliance can be met by installing the new PCU Y-103 (software P/
N HAM56-21PC-1030) software or installing the previous PCU Y-102
(software P/N HAM57-21PC-1020) software, provided that Work Packages 2
and 3 of Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 003,
dated March 29, 2017; or Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-
00, Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017; are also done. We revised the
``Related Service Information under 1 CFR part 51'' paragraph of this
final rule to include Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210083-00,
Issue 001, dated February 9, 2017. We have revised paragraphs (g)(1)
and (g)(2) of this AD to allow Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210083-00, Issue 001, dated February 9, 2017, as an optional method
of compliance for Work Package 1 of Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210075-00, Issue 003, dated March 29, 2017; and Boeing Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017.

Request To Include Required for Compliance (RC) Steps

    United Airlines observed Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210075-00, Issue 003, dated March 29, 2017; and Boeing Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017;
do not contain steps that are designated as RC (Required for
Compliance).
    We infer the commenter is requesting that Boeing revise the service
information or that we clarify which steps are RC. We disagree with
making any changes because the operators can still complete the AD
requirements with the steps contained in the Accomplishment
Instructions of the referenced service information. In addition,
waiting for Boeing to change the service information would delay the
release of the AD. Further, certain steps include aircraft maintenance
manual (AMM) reference material. When the words ``refer to'' are used
and the operator has an accepted alternative procedure, the accepted
alternative procedure can be used without the need to obtain an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC). We have not changed this AD in
this regard.

Requests To Clarify the Discussion Section

    Boeing requested that we make several clarifications to the
Discussion section of the NPRM. Boeing requested that the following
changes be made to the Discussion section of the NPRM:
     Add the following statement: ``The redesigned CAC outlet
pressure sensor J-Tube hardware is to prevent transducer fouling, which
could compromise surge detection.'' Boeing stated the NPRM does not
describe the purpose of the hardware change.
     In the sentence, ``Smarter Environmental Control System
ensures that airflow is distributed equally across the CACs,'' replace
the phrase ``Smarter Environmental Control System'' with ``the system
controller.'' Boeing stated airflow distribution amongst CACs does not
pertain to what they refer to as the Smarter Environmental Control
System, and the fundamental control approach for CACs attempts to
distribute flow equally across CACs.
     Modify the sentence ``PCU software logic was only designed
to detect the surge when both CACs were operating on the same pack, and
therefore, it was unable to detect a persistent single CAC surge
condition which led to CAC inlet overheating'' to ``PCU software logic
was only designed to react to the surge when both CACs are operating on
the same pack, and therefore, it was unable to command a termination of
the persistent single CAC surge condition which led to CAC inlet
overheating.'' Boeing stated that when only a single CAC is operating
on a pack and airflow drops to an unintended low level, the surge will
be detected by the system controls. Boeing explained that due to a
software requirements error, the CAC will not be shut down and the
surge can persist. Boeing concluded that the issue is not that the
surge is undetected but rather that the issue is that the controls fail
to react to that surge condition.
     Modify the sentence ``In addition, we received a report of
an in-service event involving foreign object debris in the CAC inlet
and accumulation at the ozone converter that also led to a persistent
single CAC surge resulting in overheat damage to the CAC inlet
housing'' to ``In addition, we received a report of an in-service event
involving persistent single CAC surge resulting in overheat damage to
the CAC inlet housing and foreign object debris in the CAC inlet and
accumulation at the ozone converter.'' Boeing stated that aspects of
this particular event are unknown; however, it is likely the foreign
object debris was a result of the persistent surge event.
     Modify the sentence ``The proposed PCU software change
would redistribute the airflow to provide more flow to a single CAC,
reducing the potential for a CAC surge'' to ``The PCU software change
enables a single CAC in surge to be commanded off in order to prevent
the persistent surge condition. Additionally, the software
redistributes the airflow to provide more flow to a single CAC,
reducing the potential for a CAC surge.'' Boeing stated the software
changes are not ``proposed'' and already exist. Boeing also stated the
key software feature needed for persistent surge prevention was not in
the original sentence.
     Modify the sentence ``Reduced airflow leading to
persistent CAC surge conditions and CAC inlet overheating, if not
corrected, could result in structural degradation of the CAC inlet, and
fumes in the cabin and flight deck, as well as causing interruption to
in-service air conditioning'' to ``PCU controls that do not react to a
single CAC in persistent CAC surge conditions leading to CAC inlet
overheating, if not corrected, could result in structural degradation
of the CAC inlet, and fumes in the cabin and flight deck, as well as
causing interruption to in-service air conditioning.'' Boeing stated
that the purpose of the redistribution of CAC airflow is to minimize
surge occurrence and does not relate to the overall prevention of CAC
inlet overheat.
    We agree that the changes requested by Boeing are accurate.
However, since the text of the NPRM that Boeing referenced is not
restated in this final rule, no change to the final rule is necessary.

Request for Credit for Previous Actions Accomplished

    Boeing and Etihad Airways requested that we include Boeing Service
Bulletin

B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 001, dated April 19, 2016, as a method of
compliance in the proposed AD. Boeing also requested that we include
Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 001, dated
February 24, 2016. Boeing requested that the service information be
added to paragraph (h) of the proposed AD as credit for previous
actions. Boeing stated that not all service information revisions were
included in paragraph (h) of the proposed AD, yet they all warrant
credit for addressing the AD. Etihad Airways noted that incorporation
of all revisions of Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00
comply with the proposed AD requirements.
    We agree. We have reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210075-00, Issue 001, dated February 24, 2016; and Boeing Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 001, dated April 19, 2016; and
the changes made to later revisions are clarifications. We have
determined that airplanes on which the actions specified in the earlier
revisions were done would be compliant with this AD.
    In paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, we added Boeing Service Bulletin
B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 001, dated February 24, 2016, to provide
credit and redesignated subsequent paragraphs accordingly. We also
added paragraph (h)(3) of this AD to add Boeing Service Bulletin B787-
81205-SB210077-00, Issue 001, dated April 19, 2016.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this final rule with the changes described previously and minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue
003, dated March 29, 2017; and Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210077-00, Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017. The service
information describes procedures for installing new PCU software for
the CACTCS and new CAC outlet pressure sensor J-tube hardware, and
doing related investigative and corrective actions. These documents are
distinct since they apply to different airplane models.
    We reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210083-00, Issue
001, dated February 9, 2017. The service information describes
procedures for installing new PCU software for the CACTCS to recover
the CAC from surges by reconfiguration flow schedules.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 62 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Software Installation.................  1 work-hour x $85 per                 $0             $85          $5,270
                                         hour = $85.
Modify Left and Right Inboard and       20 work-hours x $85 per           22,821          24,521       1,520,302
 Outboard CAC Modules.                   hour = $1,700.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2018-12-06 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19310; Docket No. FAA-
2017-0904; Product Identifier 2017-NM-071-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective July 16, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 787-8 and 787-9
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in the
applicable service information specified in paragraphs (c)(1) and
(c)(2) of this AD.
    (1) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 003,
dated March 29, 2017 (for Model 787-8 airplanes);
    (2) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 004,
dated September 22, 2017 (for Model 787-9 airplanes).

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 21, Air
conditioning.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report of an in-service reliability
issue involving a latent flow sensor failure combined with single
cabin air compressor (CAC) operation. This condition resulted in
reduced airflow which led to a persistent single CAC surge condition
that caused overheat damage to the CAC inlet. We are issuing this AD
to prevent CAC inlet overheating leading to structural degradation
of the CAC inlet, fumes in the cabin and flight deck, and
interruption to in-service air conditioning.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Software and Hardware Installation

    Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD: Install
new pack control unit (PCU) software for the cabin air conditioning
and temperature control system (CACTCS) and new CAC outlet pressure
sensor J-tube hardware, and do all applicable related investigative
and corrective actions; in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service information specified in
paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD. Related investigative and
corrective actions must be done before further flight.
    (1) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 003,
dated March 29, 2017 (for Boeing Model 787-8 airplanes); or Boeing
Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 004, dated September
22, 2017 (for Boeing Model 787-9 airplanes).
    (2) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210083-00, Issue 001,
dated February 9, 2017 (for all airplanes); and Work Packages 2 and
3 of the applicable service information identified in paragraph
(g)(1) of this AD.

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using the applicable service information
specified in paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(5) of this AD.
    (1) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 001,
dated February 24, 2016 (for Model 787-8 airplanes);
    (2) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 002,
dated May 11, 2016 (for Model 787-8 airplanes);
    (3) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 001,
dated April 19, 2016 (for Model 787-9 airplanes);
    (4) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 002,
dated May 11, 2016 (for Model 787-9 airplanes);
    (5) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 003,
dated October 20, 2016 (for Model 787-9 airplanes).

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be approved,
the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation
must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval
must specifically refer to this AD.

(j) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Allison Buss,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Section,
FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
phone and fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 003,
dated March 29, 2017;
    (ii) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 004,
dated September 22, 2017;
    (iii) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210083-00, Issue 001,
dated February 9, 2017.
    (3) For The Boeing Company service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual
& Data Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal
Beach, CA 90740-5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on May 31, 2018.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-12285 Filed 6-8-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


General Instructions and Helpful Information

Regarding the “Expanded” List of Variables

Trucks Involved in Fatal Accidents (TIFA) Dataset, 1991-2004

Used in Appendix V Analysis of the 2007 Hours of Service Regulatory
Impact Analysis

January 23, 2008

The accompanying Excel spreadsheet, titled “Expanded List of
Variables_TIFA_1991-2004,” contains several additional variables to
the “basic” Trucks Involved in Fatal Accidents (TIFA) datasets
representing calendar years 1991-2005 that were submitted in December
2007 to the Hours of Service (HOS) docket.  This raw data is being
placed in the docket in response to a telephone request by a member of
the public received on January 22, 2008.  It includes variables that
were used in the supplemental analysis conducted and documented in
Appendix V of the 2005 and 2007 HOS regulatory impact analysis (RIA),
which is currently in the docket.  The basic TIFA data sets submitted to
the docket included variables for “truck driver fatigue” and
“hours of driving at time of crash” and were used in analyses
conducted and documented in the RIA.

Below is general information on the variables included in this dataset,
which contains information on large trucks involved in fatal crashes
between the years 1991 and 2004.  While general information on the
variables included and analysis of this data are contained below, for
technical assistance, users are encouraged to contact Dan Blower,
Director of the Center for National Truck and Bus Statistics, University
of Michigan Transportation Research Institute at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

1) There is no variable to record weather as a contributing factor--at
least not systematically. The variable for weather is included in this
data set, but simply records the ambient conditions at the time of the
crash.

2) The fatigue and distraction variables in this dataset are recoded
from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), using the driver
contributing factors variables. 1 is yes, 0 is no.

3) Mechanical condition is recoded from the FARS vehicle factors
variables. If *any* mechanical condition was coded by FARS, I set the
variable to 1, otherwise zero.

4) Note that in the “basic” TIFA data sets contained in the HOS
docket (years 1991-2002, and 2003-2005), cases were excluded where the
vehicle was government owned or where the vehicle was a daily rental and
GVWR was less than class 7, since they are not generally subject to
FMCSA regulations.  In this dataset, “all” cases are included, but
we have also enclosed the variables to do the exclusion, if that is
desired.

e.g., if v1058=6 then delete

       if v1058=7 and v1050<7 then delete.

5) The code labels for weather are included below; note that this simply
records the condition at the time of the crash, not contribution.

     1='Normal'

     2='Rain'

     3='Sleet'

     4='Snow'

     5='Fog'

     6='Rain & Fog'

     7='Sleet & Fog'

     8='Other'

     9='Unknown';

6) The number of vehicles variables in the dataset simply records the
total number of vehicles in the crash.

7) The codes for the “hours driving” variable are included below:

 1-95, actual number of hours driving.

  96='UNK-LEGAL'

  97='UNK-NOT LEGAL'

  98='NOT APP'

  99='UNKNOWN'

For technical Assistance, contact:

Dan Blower

Director, Center for National Truck and Bus Statistics

University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute

(734) 763-6079.


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11864-11865]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04638]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Meeting: RTCA Program Management Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Program Management Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a
meeting of RTCA Program Management Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 18, 2014 from 8:30am-1:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is
hereby given for a Program Management Committee meeting. The agenda
will include the following:

March 18

 WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS
 REVIEW/APPROVE Meeting Summary
 December 18, 2014, RTCA Paper No. 032-14/PMC-1178
 PUBLICATION CONSIDERATION/APPROVAL
    [cir] Final Draft, New Document, Safety, Performance and
Interoperability Requirements Document for Traffic Situation Awareness
with Alerts (TSAA), RTCA Paper No. 020-14/PMC-1177, prepared by SC-186
    [cir] Final Draft, New Document, Architecture Recommendations for
Aeronautical Information (AI) and Meteorological (MET) Data Link
Services, RTCA Paper No. 017-14/PMC-1174, prepared by SC-206.
    [cir] Final Draft, Change 1 to DO-224C--Signal-In-Space Minimum
Aviation System Performance Standards (MASPS) for Advanced VHF Digital
Data Communications Including Compatibility with Digital Voice
Techniques, RTCA Paper No. 011-14/PMC-1169, prepared by SC-214.
    [cir] Final Draft, Change 1 to DO-280B--Interoperability
Requirements Standard for Aeronautical Telecommunication Network
Baseline 1 (ATN B1 Interop Standards), RTCA Paper No. 009-14/PMC-1167,
prepared by SC-214.
    [cir] Final Draft, Change 1 to DO-281C--Minimum Operational
Performance Standards (MOPS) for Aircraft VDL Mode 2 Physical Link and
Network Layer, RTCA Paper No. 010-14/PMC-1168, prepared by SC-214.
    [cir] Final Draft, New Document, Safety and Performance Standard
for Baseline 2 ATS Data Communications, Initial Release, (Baseline 2
SPR Standard), RTCA Paper No. 012-14/PMC-1170, prepared by SC-214.
    [cir] Final Draft, New Document, Interoperability Requirements
Standard for Baseline 2 ATS Data Communications, Initial Release,
(Baseline 2 Interop Standard), RTCA Paper No. 013-14/PMC-1171, prepared
by SC-214.
    [cir] Final Draft, New Document, Interoperability Requirements
Standard for Baseline 2 ATS Data Communications, ATN Baseline 1
Accommodation, Initial Release, (ATN Baseline 1--Baseline 2 Interop
Standard), RTCA Paper No. 014-14/PMC-1172, prepared by SC-214.
    [cir] Final Draft, New Document, Interoperability Requirements
Standard for Baseline 2 ATS Data Communication, FANS 1/A Accommodation,
Initial Release, (FANS 1/A--Baseline 2 Interop Standard), RTCA Paper
No. 015-14/PMC-1173, prepared by SC-214.
    [cir] Final Draft, New Document, Detect and Avoid (DAA) White
Paper, RTCA Paper No. 018-14/PMC-

1175, prepared by SC-228.
    [cir] Final Draft, New Document, Command and Control (C2) Data Link
White Paper, RTCA Paper No. 019-14/PMC-1176, prepared by SC-228.
 INTEGRATION and COORDINATION COMMITTEE (ICC)
    [cir] Activity Report.--ISRA Review.
 ACTION ITEM REVIEW
    [cir] Ground Proximity Warning Equipment--Discussion--Possible New
Special
    [cir] PMC Ad Hoc--Standards Overlap and Alignment--Discussion--
Status
    [cir] PMC Ad Hoc--Part 23 ARC Report--Areas/Recommendations for
RTCA Support--Discussion--Status
    [cir] RTCA Policy on Propriety Information--Discussion
 DISCUSSION
    [cir] Wake Vortex--Presentation--Review of industry developments
that support renewed standards work
    [cir] SC-206--Aeronautical Information Services (AIS) and
Meteorological Data Link Services--Discussion--Revised Terms of
Reference
    [cir] C-225--Rechargeable Lithium Batteries and Battery Systems--
Discussion--Revised Terms of Reference
    [cir] NAC--Status Update
    [cir] FAA Actions Taken on Previously Published Documents--Report
    [cir] Special Committees--Chairmen's Reports and Active Inter-
Special Committee Requirements Agreements (ISRA)--Review
    [cir] European/EUROCAE Coordination--Status Update
 OTHER BUSINESS
 SCHEDULE for COMMITTEE DELIVERABLES and NEXT MEETING DATE
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the ``FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT'' section. Members of the public
may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 25, 2014.
Paige Williams,
Management Analyst,
    NextGen, Business Operations Group,
    Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-04638 Filed 2-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 54 (Thursday, March 19, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15727-15729]
[FR Doc No: 2020-05651]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2020-0021]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Cumberland River, Nashville, TN

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing an emergency temporary safety
zone for all navigable waters of the Cumberland River extending from
mile marker (MM) 182 to MM 194 near Nashville, TN. This emergency
safety zone is needed to protect life, vessels, and the marine
environment due to damage caused by a tornado near Nashville, TN. Entry
of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) or a
designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from March 19, 2020
until April 2, 2020 or until the hazards have been mitigated. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from March 3, 2020
until March 19, 2020.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2020-0021 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Riley Jackson, Sector Ohio Valley, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable and contrary to
the public interest. On March 3, 2020, a tornado near MM 190 caused
significant damage to the waterway near Nashville, TN. The safety zone
must be established immediately to protect people and vessels near the
impacted portion of the waterway, and we lack sufficient time to
provide a reasonable comment period and then consider those comments
before issuing the rule. This safety zone may include closures and/or
navigation restrictions and requirements that are vital to maintaining
safe navigation on the Cumberland River. Therefore, delaying the
effective date for this emergency safety zone to complete the NPRM
process would also be contrary to the public interest as it would delay
the safety measures vital to safe navigation.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to public interest because immediate action
is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment
from potential hazards created by the sunken vessel.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Sector Ohio
Valley (COTP) has determined that due to the damage from the tornado,
there will be a safety concern for anyone within mile marker (MM) 182
to MM 194 on the Cumberland River. This rule is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters
within the safety zone while damage assessments are conducted.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary emergency safety zone
for all navigable waters on the Cumberland River from Mile Marker (MM)
182 to MM 194, extending the entire width of the Cumberland River.
Transit into and through this area is prohibited for all traffic
beginning March 3, 2020 and will continue through April 2, 2020 or
until the hazard has been mitigated. The COTP will terminate the
enforcement of this safety zone before April 2, 2020 if the hazards to
the waterway have been mitigated. Entry into this safety zone is
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the COTP or his designated
representative. A designated representative is a commissioned, warrant,
or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard assigned to units under the
operational control of USCG Sector Ohio Valley.
    Requests for entry will be considered and reviewed on a case-by-
case basis. The COTP may be contacted by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
can be reached by VHF-FM channel 16. Persons and vessels permitted to
enter this safety zone must transit at their slowest safe speed and
comply with all lawful directions issued by the COTP or the designated
representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and

pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt from the requirements of
Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-year of the safety zone. This safety
zone will restrict vessel traffic from entering or transiting within a
12.0 mile area of navigable waterways on the Cumberland River between
MMs 182 and 194. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue Broadcast Notice
to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule
allows vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guides the
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves
a safety zone lasting 24 hours a day, for 30 days, that will prohibit
entry into a 12-mile stretch of the Cumberland River. This rule is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(d) in
Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementing
Procedures. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating
the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T08-0021 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T08-0021  Safety Zone; Cumberland River, Nashville, TN.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of the Cumberland River from Mile Marker (MM) 182 to MM 194,
extending the entire width of the river.
    (b) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from March 3,
2020 and will continue through April 2, 2020 or until hazards have been
mitigated, whichever occurs first.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry of vessels or persons into this zone
is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) or designated representative. A designated
representative is a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard assigned to units under the operational control of USCG
Sector Ohio Valley.
    (2) Vessels requiring entry into this safety zone must request
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. To seek entry
into the safety zone, contact the COTP or the

COTP's representative by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or on VHF-FM channel
16.
    (3) Persons and vessels permitted to enter this safety zone must
transit at their slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful
directions issued by the COTP or the designated representative.
    (d) Information broadcasts. The COTP or a designated representative
will inform the public through Broadcast Notices to Mariners of any
changes in the planned schedule.

    Dated: March 3, 2020.
A.M. Beach,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2020-05651 Filed 3-18-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 143 (Friday, July 24, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 44953]
[FR Doc No: 2020-16059]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. 2020-55]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; Airbus
Helicopters, Inc.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of Federal Aviation Regulations. The
purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and
participation in, the FAA's exemption process. Neither publication of
this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary
is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final
disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before August 13, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2020-0602
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140,
West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan Blatchford,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Office of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 17, 2020.
Brandon Roberts,
Executive Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2020-0602.
    Petitioner: Airbus Helicopters, Inc.
    Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected: Sec.  120.109(a)(1).
    Description of Relief Sought: Airbus Helicopters, Inc. (Airbus),
seeks relief from Sec.  120.109(a)(1) to allow Airbus to permit
employees performing safety-sensitive functions in the Columbus,
Mississippi repair station to perform safety-sensitive functions in the
Grand Prairie, Texas, repair station, without being subject to
additional pre-employment testing.

[FR Doc. 2020-16059 Filed 7-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P