[Federal Register: July 24, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 141)]
[Notices]
[Page 36810-36811]
[DOCID:fr24jy09-160]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Approvals and
Disapprovals

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Monthly Notice of PFC Approvals and Disapprovals. In February
2009, there were three applications approved. This notice also includes
information on one application, approved in January 2009, inadvertently
left off the January 2009 notice. Additionally, seven approved
amendments to previously approved applications are listed.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA publishes a monthly notice, as appropriate, of PFC
approvals and disapprovals under the provisions of the Aviation Safety
and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101-508) and Part 158 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 158). This notice is
published pursuant to paragraph d of Sec.  158.29.

PFC Applications Approved

    Public Agency: Yuma County Airport Authority, Yuma, Arizona.
    Application Number: 09-03-C-00-NYL.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved In This Decision: $1,251,361.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: January 1, 2013.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: July 1, 2017.
    Class Of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC'S:
    Nonscheduled/on-demand air carriers filing FAA Form 1800-31.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the approved
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Yuma Marine Corps Air Station/Yuma International Airport.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:
    Cargo apron rehabilitation and expansion.
    Airport security.
    Rehabilitate apron and taxilanes.
    Conduct airport master plan.
    Decision Date: January 30, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darlene Williams, Los Angeles Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: City of Roswell, New Mexico.
    Application Number: 09-04-C-00-ROW. Application Type: Impose and
use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $510,594.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: April 1, 2009.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: December 1, 2013.
    Class Of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC's:
    None.
    Brief Description of Project Approved for Collection and Use:
    Terminal renovation and expansion.
    Enhanced taxiway markings.
    Deicing equipment.
    Air terminal fire alarm upgrade.
    Passenger terminal seating.
    Rehabilitate taxiways C and H: design and construction.
    Relocate airport beacon and tower.
    Rehabilitate and enhance security system and fencing.
    Install airport entrance sign.
    Expand and rehabilitate public parking lot--non-revenue.
    Airport master plan update.
    Acquire passenger loading ramp.
    Acquire snow removal vehicle.
    Runway rubber removal.
    Acquire electric ground power unit.
    Rehabilitate terminal apron.
    Rehabilitate runway 3/21.
    PFC administration costs.
    Decision Date: February 3, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andy Velayos, Louisiana, New Mexico
Airports Development Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: Westchester County Department of Transportation--
Airport Division, White Plains, New York.
    Application Number: 09-05-C-00-HPN.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC. PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved In This Decision: $18,000,000.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: April 1, 2009.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: August 1, 2013.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFC's:
    Nonscheduled/on-demand air carriers filing FAA Form 1800-31.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the approved
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Westchester County Airport.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:
    In-line baggage screening facility (design and construction).
    Conveyance and disposal system for aircraft deicing fluid
contaminated water (design and construction).
    Decision Date: February 24, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Brooks, New York Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: City of Chicago, Department of Aviation, Chicago,
Illinois.
    Application Number: 08-21-C-00-ORD.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $231,690,213.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: July 1, 2024.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: May 1, 2026.
    Class Of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC's:
    Air taxi.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the approved
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Chicago O'Hare International Airport.
    Brief Description of Project Approved for Collection and Use at a
$4.50 PFC Level:
    Airfield design.
    Brief Description of Projects Partially Approved for Collection and
Use at a $3.00 PFC Level:
    Western terminal area planning.
    Determination: The FAA has determined that the City did not provide
enough information for justification of the line items ``forecast
review/derivative forecasts,'' ``airfield simulation,'' and
``supplemental studies revenue enhancement/new technologies'' in the
PFC application. Therefore, those line items, totaling $570,960 in PFC
revenue, were not approved for use of PFC revenue.
    Airport access road improvements.
    Determination: After review of the information provided by the
City, the FAA determined that portions of the roadways included in the
project description are ineligible for PFC funding.
    Airport transit system (ATS) vehicle acquisition and system
improvements.
    Determination: After review of the information provided by the
City, the FAA determined that there was a mathematical error in the
amount the City originally requested for purchase of nine ATS cars.
Therefore, the FAA's approved amount was less than the amount
originally requested by the City.
    Decision Date: February 26, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack Delaney, Chicago Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

                                           Amendments to PFC Approvals
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Original     Amended      Original     Amended
                                                  Amendment     approved     approved    estimated    estimated
           Amendment No. city, state               approved     net PFC      net PFC    charge exp.  charge exp.
                                                     date       revenue      revenue        date         date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
95-01-C-03-ABY Albany, GA......................      2/10/09     $362,561     $348,383     06/01/98     06/01/98
98-02-C-03-ABY Albany, GA......................      2/10/09      540,050      540,050     08/01/03     08/01/03
98-02-C-04-ABY Albany, GA......................      2/10/09      540,050      539,645     08/01/03     08/01/03
02-06-C-07-MSY New Orleans, LA.................      2/12/09  276,286,494  271,336,494     12/01/17     12/01/17
99-04-C-05-PNS Pensacola, FL...................      2/18/09   15,217,577   15,165,298     09/01/07     09/01/07
93-06-U-03-PNS Pensacola, FL...................      2/18/09           NA           NA     09/01/07     09/01/07
95-01-C-06-MCI Kansas City, MO.................      2/23/09  295,096,669  277,485,571     02/01/12     12/01/10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 16, 2009.
Joe Hebert,
Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger Facility Charge Branch.
[FR Doc. E9-17450 Filed 7-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47063-47064]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21672]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81805; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2017-099]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Remove Obsolete Text From Options Regulatory Fee Rule

October 3, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 25, 2017, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to remove obsolete rule text from Chapter XV,
Section 5, entitled ``NASDAQ Options Regulatory Fee.''
    The text of the proposed rule change is set forth below. Proposed
deletions are enclosed in [brackets].
* * * * *

NASDAQ Stock Market Rules

* * * * *

Options Rules

* * * * *

Chapter XV Options Pricing

* * * * *

Sec. 5 NASDAQ Options Regulatory Fee

    NOM Participants will be assessed an Options Regulatory Fee of
[$0.0021 per contract side.
    Effective August 1, 2017, the ORF shall be ]$0.0027 per contract
side.
    The Options Regulatory Fee (``ORF'') is assessed by NOM to each NOM
Participant for options transactions cleared by OCC in the Customer
range where: (1) The execution occurs on NOM or (2) the execution
occurs on another exchange and is cleared by a NOM Participant. The ORF
is collected by OCC on behalf of NOM from (1) NOM clearing members for
all Customer transactions they clear or (2) non-members for all
Customer transactions they clear that were executed on NOM. NOM uses
reports from OCC when assessing and collecting ORF. The Exchange will
notify Participants via an Options Trader Alert of any change in the
amount of the fee at least 30 calendar days prior to the effective date
of the change.
    NOM Participants who do not transact an equities business on the
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC in a calendar year will receive a refund of the
fees specified in Rule 7003(b) upon written notification to the
Exchange along with documentation evidencing that no equities business
was conducted on The NASDAQ Stock Market for that calendar year. The
Exchange will accept refund requests up until sixty (60) days after the
end of the calendar year.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange recently amended its Options Regulatory Fee or ``ORF''
at Chapter XV, Section 5.\3\ At that time the rule text reflected the
current fee and the proposed amendment which took effect on August 1,
2017. For clarity and ease of reference, the Exchange proposes to
remove the outdated reference to the prior ORF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81344 (August 8,
2017), 82 FR 37955 (August 14, 2017) (SR-NASDAQ-2017-68).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This rule change is non-substantive and merely serves to update the
rule text.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\4\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\5\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest,
by removing obsolete rule text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to remove outdated references to ORF prior to
August 1, 2017. The Exchange believes this rule change will provide
clarity and ease of reference when Participants review the ORF rule.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change is a non-
substantive amendment to remove obsolete rule text.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \6\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings

to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2017-099 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2017-099. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2017-099 and should
be submitted on or before October 31, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-21672 Filed 10-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 11/15/2007 06:24 PM

To

Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Subject

RE: Follow up to you ph mssg: NAAQS Mtgs

Great!  Thank you --

heidi

-----Original Message-----

From<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 6:08 PM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc: Schwab, Margo; Johansson, Robert<EMAIL_ADDRESS> <EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Subject: Re: Follow up to you ph mssg: NAAQS Mtgs

Thanks for your e-mail Heidi.  I think the plan you lay out is fine.  I

want to check with Karen about sharing  the current version of the ozone

comments briefing with the interagency folks, as she wanted to take one

more look at the detailed comments slides in the appendix.  Once she's

done that, and we've made any amendments that are needed, which should

be no later than Monday, you can share the whole briefing with the

interagency folks.  We would be delighted if the reading the briefing is

sufficient for them.   On the lead ANPR, I think we can meet on Monday

Nov. 26 in Karen's absence as long as Deirdre Murphy is available.  I'll

check with both Karen and Deirdre tomorrow and let you know.  Thanks

Heidi.  Hope you have a good evening.

             "King, Heidi R."

             <Heidi_R._King@o

             mb.eop.gov>                                             To

                                      Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

             11/15/2007 05:32                                        cc

             PM                       "Johansson, Robert"

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>                                       , "Schwab, Margo"

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

                                                                Subject

                                      Follow up to you ph mssg: NAAQS

                                      Mtgs

Hi Lydia,

Thanks for your call.  Our thinking is the following:

O3:

1.  Interagency Briefing on O3 NAAQS Comments:  Before setting up an

interagency call, I'd like to share the briefing slides with agency

commenters.  The document is very well constructed and may suffice in

lieu of an interagency conference call.  Does EPA approve sharing of the

briefing with the involved agencies?

2.  Secondary O3 NAAQS Comments:  We'd like to review briefly as part of

the meeting on Tues 11/20 @1pm

3. Tues 11/20 Agenda:  We propose the agenda be modified to include ~15

minute discussion of secondary NAAQS comments and ~45 minute follow up

on all comments and/or points of discussion

Pb:

- We're doing our best to move forward quickly

- To discuss the Pb ANPRM, Margaret scheduled 30 min Tues 11/20

following our O3 conversation

- In case there's a need for an interagency call on the Pb package, I

asked Margaret to hold Mon 11/26, although I understand Karen will be

unavailable.  I don't want to delay further out of respect for EPA's

timeline; what is your thinking around an interagency call without Karen

vs delaying a day or two?

Thanks Lydia, have a good evening -

heidi

(202) 395-4551


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 214 (Monday, November 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55356-55357]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24095]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC19-17-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
    Description: Application for Authorization under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
    Filed Date: 10/29/18.
    Accession Number: 20181029-5170.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/19/18.

    Docket Numbers: EC19-18-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Services, LLC, Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy
Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc., Entergy New Orleans, LLC,
Entergy Texas, Inc.

    Description: Application for Authorization under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of Entergy Services, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 10/29/18.
    Accession Number: 20181029-5180.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/19/18.

    Docket Numbers: EC19-19-000.
    Applicants: Plymouth Rock Energy, LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act, et al. of Plymouth Rock Energy, LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5094.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1911-003; ER12-1912-003; ER12-1913-003; ER12-
1915-003; ER12-1916-003; ER12-1917-003; ER14-41-002; ER14-42-002.
    Applicants: RE McKenzie 1 LLC, RE McKenzie 2 LLC, RE McKenzie 3
LLC, RE McKenzie 4 LLC, RE McKenzie 5 LLC, RE McKenzie 6 LLC, RE
Rosamond One LLC, RE Rosamond Two LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of the
McKenzie and Rosamond Sellers.
    Filed Date: 10/29/18.
    Accession Number: 20181029-5174.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/19/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1628-001.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2018-10-29_Additional Compliance
for Order 842 Primary Frequency Response to be effective 5/15/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/29/18.
    Accession Number: 20181029-5143.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/19/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-2419-001.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: 2018-10-30_SA 2953 Quilt Block Wind
Farm-ATC Substitute 2nd Rev GIA (J395 J652) to be effective 8/28/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5064.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-209-000.
    Applicants: San Diego Gas & Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019 SDGE TRBAA Update to
Transmission Owner Tariff Filing to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/29/18.
    Accession Number: 20181029-5122.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/19/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-210-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Maintenance Adder Revisions
to the PJM Tariff to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 10/29/18.
    Accession Number: 20181029-5154.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/19/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-211-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc.,
Entergy New Orleans, LLC, Entergy Texas, Inc., Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: TCCs JOOA to be effective
12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 10/29/18.
    Accession Number: 20181029-5161.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/19/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-212-000.
    Applicants: NorthWestern Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SA 296 5th Rev--NITSA-NOA
with Exxon Mobil Corporation to be effective 8/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/29/18.
    Accession Number: 20181029-5162.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/19/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-213-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: NCEMPA 1 RS No. 318 (2019)
to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5029.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-214-000.
    Applicants: South Carolina Electric & Gas Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SCPSA Interconnection
Agreement to be effective 12/31/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5041.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-215-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Cane Creek Solar LGIA Filing
to be effective 10/23/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5047.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-216-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Moonshot Solar LGIA Filing
to be effective 10/23/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5053.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-217-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Progress, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: DEP-NCEMC (RS-182) Amendment
to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5061.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-218-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2018-10-30_SA 3193 OSER-
Ameren Illinois GIA (J644) to be effective 10/17/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5090.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-219-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019 RSBAA Update Filing to
be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5120.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-222-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Power and Light Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: WPL--Mazomanie Wholesale
Service Agreement to be effective 12/31/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5156.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 30, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-24095 Filed 11-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 19 (Friday, January 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4584-4585]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01763]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0093; FRL-9517-01-OMS]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Ferroalloys Production:
Ferromanganese and Silicomanganese (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), NESHAP for Ferroalloys
Production: Ferromanganese and Silicomanganese (EPA ICR Number 1831.08,
OMB Control Number 2060-0391), to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act. This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is
currently approved through March 31, 2022. Public comments were
previously requested, via the Federal Register, on April 13, 2021
during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30
days for public comments. A fuller description of the ICR is given
below, including its estimated burden and cost to the public. An agency
may neither conduct nor sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before February 28,
2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OAR-2021-0093, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method)
or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
    Submit written comments and recommendations to OMB for the proposed
information collection within 30 days of publication of this notice to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information
collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for
Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Muntasir Ali, Sector Policies and
Program Division (D243-05), Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or in person, at the EPA Docket Center,
WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington,
DC. The telephone number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For
additional information about EPA's public docket, visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

    Abstract: Owners and operators of ferromanganese and
silicomanganese production facilities are required to comply with
reporting and record keeping requirements for the General Provisions
(40 CFR part 63, subpart A), as well as for the applicable specific
standards in 40 CFR part 63 Subpart XXX. This includes submitting
initial notifications, performance tests and periodic reports and
results, and maintaining records of the occurrence and duration of any
startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected
facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is
inoperative. These reports are used by EPA to determine compliance with
these standards.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Ferroalloy production facilities
that manufacture ferromanganese and silicomanganese.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart XXX).
    Estimated number of respondents: 2 (total).
    Frequency of response: Quarterly, semiannually, and annually.
    Total estimated burden: 1,610 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $609,000 (per year), which includes $424,000
for annualized capital/startup and/or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a change in burden from the
most-recently approved ICR (ICR Number 1831.07) as currently identified
in the OMB Inventory of Approved Burdens. This is due to several
considerations. The regulations are not anticipated to change over the
next three years. The growth rate for this industry is either very low
or non-existent, so there is no change in the number of respondents.
The 2015 Risk and Technology Review final rule, issued June 30, 2015
(80 FR 37366), and the 2017 reconsideration, issued January 18, 2017
(82 FR 5408), revised the rule significantly, resulting in changes in
the labor burden, capital/startup costs, and operation and maintenance
(O&M) costs. However, these changes were not included in the
previously-approved ICR (ICR Number 1831.07: Issued March 8, 2019).
Instead, the burden for the rule revision was included in ICR Number
2448.02, issued March 16, 2015, which showed only the increase in
burden due to the rule changes. This ICR (1831.08) combines and
incorporates the `burden' from the 2015 and 2017 rule revisions, as
shown in ICR Number 2448.02, with the `burden' shown in the previously-
approved ICR (1831.07). This ICR also reorganizes and clarifies the
`burden' associated with each rule requirement.
    There is a decrease in the total estimated burden for capital/
startup costs from that shown in ICR Number 2448.02. This decrease is
not due to any program changes. The change in the burden and cost
estimates occurred because the revised standard has been in effect for
more than three years and the requirements are different during initial
compliance. ICR Number 2448.02 reflected those burdens and costs
associated with the initial activities for the two subject facilities.
This includes purchasing monitoring equipment, conducting performance
test(s) and establishing recordkeeping systems. This ICR reflects the
on-going burden and costs for existing facilities.
    There is an increase in the total estimated burden from that shown
in ICR Number 2448.02. This increase is not due to any program changes.
This increase is due to an omission in the burden calculations for O&M
costs in ICR Number 2448.02, which failed to include costs for periodic
testing (every five years) for certain equipment and processes.
    The 2020 amendment to the regulation (85 FR 73902) added electronic
notification requirements, but this did not add to the burden. There is
a slight increase in labor costs, which is due wholly to the use of
updated labor rates. This ICR uses labor rates from the most-recent
Bureau of Labor Statistics report (March 2021) to calculate respondent
burden costs.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-01763 Filed 1-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28151-28153]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12892]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 117 / Monday, June 18, 2018 / Rules
and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0104; Product Identifier 2017-CE-036-AD; Amendment
39-19311; AD 2018-12-07]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2015-24-06 for
certain Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Model GVI airplanes. AD 2015-
24-06 required repetitive breakaway torque checks and torqueing of the
main landing gear (MLG) brake inlet self-sealing couplings and
inserting a dispatch and takeoff limitation to the limitations section
of the airplane flight manual. This AD requires modifying the MLG and
brake assembly. This AD was prompted by reports of the self-sealing
couplings on the MLG brake inlet fitting backing out of the fully
seated position. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective July 23, 2018.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of July 23,
2018.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, P.O. Box 2206, Savannah,
Georgia 31404-2206; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email: [email protected]; internet: www.gulfstream.com. You may view
this service information at the FAA, Policy and Innovation Division,
901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is
also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0104.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0104; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gideon Jose, Aerospace Engineer,
Altanta ACO Branch, FAA, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2015-24-06, Amendment 39-18338 (80 FR 75788,
December 4, 2015) (``AD 2015-24-06''). AD 2015-24-06 applied to certain
Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation (Gulfstream) Model GVI airplanes and
required repetitive breakaway torque checks and torqueing of the main
landing gear (MLG) brake inlet self-sealing couplings and inserting a
dispatch and takeoff limitation to the limitations section of the
airplane flight manual.
    The NPRM published in the Federal Register on February 12, 2018 (83
FR 5958). AD 2015-24-06 was prompted by reports of the self-sealing
couplings on the MLG brake inlet fitting backing out of the fully
seated position. The NPRM was prompted by the development of
modifications that when incorporated would terminate the need for
repetitive breakaway torque checks and torqueing of the brake inlet
self-sealing couplings.
    The NPRM proposed to require modifying the MLG with new tube
assemblies without self-sealing couplings and adding lock wire. The
NPRM also proposed to require inspecting and modifying the brake
assembly. The NPRM proposed to not retain any of the requirements of AD
2015-24-06.
    We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products, which if not addressed could result in loss of braking
capability on one or multiple brakes and lead to runway overrun or
asymmetrical braking that could result in lateral runway excursion.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Gulfstream G650 Customer Bulletin Number 155B, dated
July 26, 2017; and Gulfstream G650ER Customer Bulletin Number 155B,
dated July 26, 2017. For the applicable model designations, this
service information describes procedures to modify the MLG and brake
assemblies. This service information is reasonably available because
the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 162 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement of brake hose assemblies,   65.5 work-hours x $85            $14,776      $20,343.50      $3,295,647
 inspection of brake assembly            per hour = $5,567.50.
 attachment bolts, and modification of
 the brake assembly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to small airplanes, gliders,
balloons, airships, domestic business jet transport airplanes, and
associated appliances to the Director of the Policy and Innovation
Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2015-24-06, Amendment 39-18338 (80 FR 75788, December 4, 2015), and
adding the following new AD:

2018-12-07 Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation: Amendment 39-19311;
Docket No. FAA-2018-0104; Product Identifier 2017-CE-36-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective July 23, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2015-24-06, Amendment 39-18338 (80 FR 75788,
December 4, 2015) (``AD 2015-24-06'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Model GVI
airplanes, serial numbers 6001 and 6003 through 6163, certificated
in any category.

    Note 1 to paragraph (c) of this AD:  Model GVI airplanes are
also referred to by the marketing designations G650 and G650ER.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 32, Landing Gear.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    AD 2015-24-06 was prompted by reports of the main landing gear
(MLG) self-sealing couplings on the MLG brake inlet fitting backing
out of the fully seated position. This AD was prompted by the
development of modifications that when incorporated would terminate
the need for repetitive breakaway torque checks and torqueing of the
brake inlet self-sealing couplings. We are issuing this AD to
prevent loss of braking capability on one or multiple brakes. The
unsafe condition, if not addressed, could lead to runway overrun or
asymmetrical braking that could result in lateral runway excursion.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Modification of the MLG and MLG Brake Assemblies

    (1) Within 6 months after July 23, 2018 (the effective date of
this AD), modify the MLG and brake assemblies following the
Accomplishment Instructions in Gulfstream G650 Customer Bulletin
Number 155B, dated July 26, 2017; and Gulfstream G650ER Customer
Bulletin Number 155B, dated July 26, 2017.
    (2) Although Gulfstream G650 Customer Bulletin Number 155B,
dated July 26, 2017; and Gulfstream G650ER Customer Bulletin Number
155B, dated July 26, 2017, both contain reporting requirements and
return of certain parts to the manufacturer, this AD does not
include those requirements.
    (3) AD 2015-24-06 required a dispatch and takeoff limitation in
the airplane flight manual. Although we did not retain that
requirement in this AD, if not already removed, this limitation
should be removed after the modification in paragraph (g)(1) of this
AD is done.

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

    If done before July 23, 2018 (the effective date of this AD),
this AD allows credit for the actions in paragraph (g) of this AD
following Gulfstream G650 Customer Bulletin 155, dated July 29,
2016; Gulfstream G650ER Customer Bulletin 155, dated July 29, 2016;
Gulfstream G650 Customer Bulletin 155A, dated August 19, 2016; or
Gulfstream G650ER Customer Bulletin 155A, dated August 19, 2016, as
applicable.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs

for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs
(i)(3)(i) and (ii) of this AD apply.
    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. An AMOC is required for any deviations to RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures.
    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.

(j) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Gideon Jose,
Aerospace Engineer, Altanta ACO Branch, FAA, 1701 Columbia Avenue,
College Park, Georgia 30337; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email: [email protected].

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Gulfstream G650 Customer Bulletin Number 155B, dated July
26, 2017.
    (ii) Gulfstream G650ER Customer Bulletin Number 155B, dated July
26, 2017.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, P.O. Box 2206, Savannah, Georgia
31404-2206; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected]; internet: www.gulfstream.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Policy and
Innovation Division, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 1, 2018.
Melvin J. Johnson,
Aircraft Certification Service, Deputy Director, Policy and Innovation
Division, AIR-601.
[FR Doc. 2018-12892 Filed 6-15-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 28642]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11769]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

    Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: [77 FR 27103,
May 8, 2012]

STATUS: Closed Meeting.

PLACE: 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC.

DATE AND TIME OF PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED MEETING: May 10, 2012 at 2 p.m.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: Time Change and Additional Item.
    The Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, May 10, 2012 at 2 p.m.
has been changed to start at 3:30 p.m. on May 10, 2012.
    The following matter will also be considered during the 3:30 p.m.
Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, May 10, 2012:
    An examination of a financial institution.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions as set
forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and (8) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(4) and (8),
permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Gallagher, as duty officer, voted to consider the item
listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session, and determined that no
earlier notice thereof was possible.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed,
please contact the Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 10, 2012.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-11769 Filed 5-11-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 83 (Monday, May 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 23402]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09118]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4486-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

Florida; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Florida (FEMA-4486-DR), dated March 25, 2020, and
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued March 11, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include Individual
Assistance limited to COVID-19 Funeral Assistance under Other Needs
Assistance for those areas determined to have been adversely affected
by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his
declaration of March 25, 2020.

    Individual Assistance limited to COVID-19 Funeral Assistance
under Other Needs Assistance for all areas in the State of Florida
(already designated for Individual Assistance, limited to the Crisis
Counseling Program and emergency protective measures [Category B]
not authorized under other Federal statutes, including direct
Federal assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

Robert J. Fenton,
Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Administrator, Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-09118 Filed 4-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 82 (Monday, April 29, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17958-17960]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08544]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2019-0287]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Grosse Pointe War Memorial Red, White, and Blue Gala
Fireworks, Lake St. Clair, Grosse Pointe, MI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters within a 420-foot radius of a portion of Lake St.
Clair, Grosse Point, MI. This zone is necessary to protect spectators
and vessels from potential hazards associated with the Grosse Pointe
War Memorial Red, White, and Blue Gala Fireworks.

DATES: This rule is effective from 9 p.m. through 10 p.m. on May 23,
2019.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0287 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email Tracy Girard, Prevention Department,
Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable. The
Coast Guard did not receive the final details of this fireworks display
in time to publish an NPRM. As such, it is impracticable to publish an
NPRM because we lack sufficient time to provide a reasonable comment
period and then consider those comments before issuing the rule.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect
participants, mariners and vessels from the hazards associated with
this event.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231); 33 CFR 1.05-1, 160.5; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
    The Captain of the Port Detroit has determined that potential
hazard associated with fireworks from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. on May 23, 2019
will be a safety concern to anyone within a 420-foot radius of the
launch site. Such hazards include premature and accidental detonations,
falling and burning debris, and collisions among spectator vessels.
This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment in the navigable waters within the safety zone while the
fireworks are being displayed.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port
Detroit has determined that this temporary safety zone is necessary to
protect persons and vessels during the fireworks display. This rule
establishes a safety zone from 9 p.m. through 10 p.m. on May 23, 2019.
The safety zone will encompass all U.S. navigable waters of Lake St.
Clair, Harrison Twp., MI, within a 420-foot radius of position
42[deg]23.132' N, 082[deg]53.740' W (NAD 83).
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Detroit or a
designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or a
designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-year of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
will be able to safely transit around this safety zone which will
impact a small designated area of Lake St. Clair from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m.
on May 23, 2019. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue Broadcast Notice
to Mariners (BNM) via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone and the
rule allows vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves
a safety zone lasting one hour that will prohibit entry into a
designated area. It is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting
this determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0287 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T09-0287  Safety Zone; Grosse Pointe War Memorial Red, White,
and Blue Gala Fireworks, Lake St. Clair, Grosse Pointe, MI.

    (a) Location. A safety zone is established to include all U.S.
navigable waters of Lake St. Clair, Harrison Twp, within a 420-foot
radius of position 42[deg]23.132' N, 082[deg]53.740' W (NAD 83).
    (b) Enforcement period. The regulated area described in paragraph
(a) will be enforced from 9 p.m. through 10 p.m. on May 23, 2019.
    (c) Regulations. (1) No vessel or person may enter, transit
through, or anchor within the safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Detroit (COTP), or his on-scene representative.
    (2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or his on-scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of COTP is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer or a Federal, State, or local
law enforcement officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the
Port Detroit to act on his behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators shall contact the COTP or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to enter or operate within the
safety zone. The COTP or his on-scene representative may be contacted
via VHF Channel 16 or at<PHONE_NUMBER>. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the regulated area must comply with
all directions given to them by the COTP or his on-scene
representative.

    Dated: April 23, 2019
Jeffrey W. Novak,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2019-08544 Filed 4-26-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P