[Federal Register: September 10, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 174)]
[Notices]
[Page 46641]
[DOCID:fr10se09-109]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Approval of the Record of Decision for Proposed
Development at the Port Columbus International Airport, Columbus, OH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Approval of the Record of Decision (ROD).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is announcing approval of the Record of Decision on
the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Section 303c Evaluation, and
Section 106 Evaluation for proposed development at the Port Columbus
International Airport, Columbus, Ohio.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Katherine S. Delaney, FAA,
Airports District Office, 11677 South Wayne Road, Suite 107, Romulus,
MI 48174, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: The ROD approves the proposed development at
Port Columbus International Airport including: construction of a
replacement runway 10,113 feet long, located 702 feet south of the
existing Runway 10R/28L; development of new terminal facilities,
including a new terminal apron in the midfield area, with access from
the south airfield; construction of additional taxiways to support the
replacement runway; necessary NAVAIDs; proposed aviation-related
development (noise berm); associated roadway relocations and
construction (internal loop roadway modifications, relocated airport
perimeter road); parking improvements (including both surface lots and
parking garage); property acquisition and relocation of residences and
businesses; construction and implementation of ancillary facilities to
support the proposed development (expansion of the central utility
plant, aircraft fueling system, airside/landside drainage improvements,
expansion of the glycol collection and treatment system, and relocation
of the utility corridors); development of air traffic operational
procedures for the replacement runway; and implementation of the
proposed Part 150 noise abatement actions.
    The ROD indicates the project is consistent with existing
environmental policies and objectives as set forth in the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, and will not
significantly affect the quality of the environment.
    In reaching this decision, the FAA has given careful consideration
to: (a) The role of CMH in the national air transportation system, (b)
aviation safety, (c) preferences of the airport owner, and (d)
anticipated environmental impact.
    Discussions of these factors are documented in the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement, the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS), Section 303c Evaluation, and the Section 106
Evaluation for the project. The notice of availability of the FEIS
appeared in the Federal Register on March 20, 2009 (Volume 74, Number
53 Pages 11986-11987), and the comment period ran through April 20,
2009. The FAA's determinations on the project are outlined in the ROD,
which was approved on August 19, 2009.

    Issued in Romulus, Michigan, on August 24, 2009.
Matthew J. Thys,
Manager, Detroit Airports District Office, FAA, Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. E9-21897 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: September 25, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 185)]
[Notices]
[Page 55780-55781]
[DOCID:fr25se06-21]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Motions
To Intervene, Protests and Comments

September 18, 2006.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Preliminary Permit.
    b. Project No.: P-12723-000.
    c. Date filed: August 18, 2006.
    d. Applicant: City of Quincy, Illinois.
    e. Name of Project: Mississippi Lock & Dam No. 20 Hydroelectric
Project.
    f. Location: At the existing U.S. Army Corps of Engineers'
Mississippi Lock and Dam No. 20 on the Mississippi River, in Lewis
County, Missouri, and Adams County, Illinois.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Kenneth Cantrell, Director of
Administrative Services, City of Quincy, 730 Maine Street, Quincy, IL
62301,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    j. Deadline for filing comments, protests, and motions to
intervene: November 24, 2006.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person in the official service list for the
project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they

must also serve a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. Description of Project: The proposed project would utilize the
existing U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Mississippi Lock and Dam No. 20,
and would consist of the following facilities: (1) A proposed
powerhouse containing 16 generating units with an installed capacity of
17.63 megawatts; (2) a proposed 12-mile-long, 34.5-kilovolt or a
proposed 4-mile-long 69-kilovolt transmission line; and (3) appurtenant
facilities. The average annual generation is estimated to be 68,527
megawatt hours.
    l. Locations of Applications: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission in the
Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A,
Washington DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also
be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the

``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is

also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item h
above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Competing Preliminary Permit: Anyone desiring to file a
competing application for preliminary permit for a proposed project
must submit the competing application itself, or a notice of intent to
file such an application, to the Commission on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application (see 18 CFR 4.36).
Submission of a timely notice of intent allows an interested person to
file the competing preliminary permit application no later than 30 days
after the specified comment date for the particular application. A
competing preliminary permit application must conform with 18 CFR
4.30(b) and 4.36.
    o. Competing Development Application: Any qualified development
applicant desiring to file a competing development application must
submit to the Commission, on or before a specified comment date for the
particular application, either a competing development application or a
notice of intent to file such an application. Submission of a timely
notice of intent to file a development application allows an interested
person to file the competing application no later than 120 days after
the specified comment date for the particular application. A competing
license application must conform with 18 CFR 4.30(b) and 4.36.
    p. Notice of Intent: A notice of intent must specify the exact
name, business address, and telephone number of the prospective
applicant, and must include an unequivocal statement of intent to
submit, if such an application may be filed, either a preliminary
permit application or a development application (specify which type of
application). A notice of intent must be served on the applicant(s)
named in this public notice.
    q. Proposed Scope of Studies Under Permit: A preliminary permit, if
issued, does not authorize construction. The term of the proposed
preliminary permit would be 36 months. The work proposed under the
preliminary permit would include economic analysis, preparation of
preliminary engineering plans, and a study of environmental impacts.
Based on the results of these studies, the Applicant would decide
whether to proceed with the preparation of a development application to
construct and operate the project.
    r. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper; See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site under ``e-filing'' link.
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing.
    s. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filings must
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS'', ``PROTEST'', OR ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as
applicable, and the Project Number of the particular application to
which the filing refers. Any of the above-named documents must be filed
by providing the original and the number of copies provided by the
Commission's regulations to: The Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. A copy of any
motion to intervene must also be served upon each representative of the
Applicant specified in the particular application.
    t. Agency Comments: Federal, State, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-15664 Filed 9-22-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 111 (Thursday, June 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27781-27782]
[FR Doc No: E9-13672]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12667-018]

City of Hamilton, OH; Notice of Application for Amendment of
License and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

June 4, 2009.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Amendment of license to change location of
powerhouse.
    b. Project No.: 12667-018.
    c. Date Filed: January 6, 2009, and supplemented on January 9,
2009, and May 21, 2009.
    d. Applicant: City of Hamilton, Ohio (Hamilton).
    e. Name of Project: Meldahl Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: When constructed, the project will be located at the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Captain Anthony Meldahl locks and dam on
the Ohio River, near the City of Augusta, Bracken County, Kentucky.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.

    h. Applicant Contact: Debra Roby, Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, PLC,
1700 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Suite 500, Washington, DC 20006-4725;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Linda Stewart, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, and e-
mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and
protests: July 6, 2009.
    Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site (http://www.ferc.gov)
under the ``e-filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.
    All documents (original and eight copies) filed by paper should be
sent to: Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Please include the project number
(P-12667-018) on any comments or motions filed.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
interveners filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person whose name appears on the official service
list for the project. Further, if an intervener files comments or
documents with the Commission relating to the merits of an issue that
may affect the responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they
must also serve a copy of the document on that resource agency. A copy
of any motion to intervene must also be served upon each representative
of the Applicant specified in the particular application.
    k. Description of Request: Hamilton proposes to change the location
of the powerhouse from the location authorized in the June 25, 2008
Order Issuing Original License (Major Project). Under Hamilton's
proposal, the powerhouse location would be moved approximately 300 feet
landward from the location authorized in the license. The centerline of
the powerhouse would be located approximately 560 feet from the
landward face of existing pier number 13, instead of approximately 250
feet from the landward face of pier number 13 as authorized in the
license.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. You may also
register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to
be notified via e-mail of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is
also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item
(h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Any filings must bear in all capital letters the title
``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable,
and the Project Number of the particular application to which the
filing refers.
    p. Agency Comments: Federal, state, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-13672 Filed 6-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Marjorie Jones/RTP/USEPA/US

05/22/2007 01:48 PM

To

"Johansson, Robert"<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Subject

Presentation for tomorrow's Ozone RIA call

Wednesday, May 23   3:00 - 4:30 p.m.

Call-in:<PHONE_NUMBER>

Marjorie C. Jones

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards

Air Benefit and Cost Group, Mail Code C439-02

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

RTP, NC 27711

voice:<PHONE_NUMBER>

fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

Shipping/receiving: 4930 Old Page Rd.

Durham, NC 27709


[Federal Register: July 26, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 143)]
[Notices]
[Page 41093-41094]
[DOCID:fr26jy07-74]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-56112; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2007-064]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Modify Fees for Members Using the Nasdaq Market Center

July 20, 2007.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 2, 2007, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been substantially prepared by Nasdaq.
Nasdaq filed the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the
Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \4\ thereunder, as establishing or
changing a due, fee, or other charge applicable to a member, which
renders the proposed rule change effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Nasdaq proposes to modify pricing for Nasdaq members using the
Nasdaq Market Center. Nasdaq will implement this rule change on July 2,
2007. The text of the proposed rule change is available at Nasdaq,
http://www.nasdaq.com, and the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1.Purpose
    On June 1, 2007,\5\ Nasdaq increased its fees for routing orders in
securities other than exchange-traded funds to the New York Stock
Exchange (``NYSE'') in instances where the order does not check the
Nasdaq book prior to routing. Nasdaq also changed its fee schedule to
provide that orders that do not attempt to execute in Nasdaq prior to
routing to other venues do not count in determining a member's average
daily volume of shares of liquidity accessed and/or routed for purposes
of determining the pricing tier applicable to a particular member.
Nasdaq is now further amending the fee schedule to increase the fees
for orders that check the Nasdaq book but only to the extent of
displayed liquidity, rather than for the full size of the order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55979 (June 28,
2007), 72 FR 37065 (July 6, 2007) ((SR-NASDAQ-2007-055) (May 29,
2007)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Market participants using Nasdaq for routing orders have the
ability to instruct as to the conditions under which routing should
occur. One possibility is to route without checking the Nasdaq book;
another is to route after checking the Nasdaq book only to extent of
displayed liquidity; and another is to send the full order for
execution against the book prior to routing, thereby allowing
undisplayed reserved size to be accessed. For example, if displayed
size at the inside was 1000 shares and 10,000 shares were in reserve at
that price, an order for 10,000 shares could be fully executed in
Nasdaq if the full order was sent, but would be routed if the order
accessed only the displayed size.
    Both the changes made in the instant proposed rule change and the
changes made in SR-NASDAQ-2007-055 are designed to enhance the quality
of Nasdaq's market by providing an incentive for members to enter
orders that check the full size of the Nasdaq book prior to routing. An
increase in the extent to which members check the book will in turn
encourage liquidity providers to post executable quotes in Nasdaq.
Moreover, since there is generally far more undisplayed liquidity than
displayed liquidity at the inside price, the proposed change will
encourage members to execute their orders in Nasdaq to the fullest
extent possible.
    For orders that check the book only to the extent of displayed
interest, the fee will be $0.00035 per share executed when routed to
the NYSE for execution and $0.0035 per share executed when routed
elsewhere. At the same time, however, Nasdaq is lowering the fee for
Directed Intermarket Sweep Orders sent to the NYSE, from $0.0035 to
$0.00035 per share executed, in keeping with the overall prevailing
level of fees for routing to NYSE.
    Finally, for the month of July 2007, Nasdaq is lowering: (i) The
volume level required for receiving a liquidity provider credit of
$0.0025 per share executed from 35 million average daily shares of
liquidity provided to 30

million average daily shares of liquidity provided; (ii) the volume
level required for paying a fee of $0.000275 per share executed when
routing to the NYSE from 35 million average daily shares of liquidity
provided to 30 million average daily shares of liquidity provided; and
(iii) one of the criteria for paying an execution/routing fee of
$0.0026 per share executed from 35 million average daily shares of
liquidity provided to 30 million average daily shares of liquidity
provided.\6\ The change reflects Nasdaq's expectation that overall
trading volumes will be low during the month of July due to the Fourth
of July holiday and the vacation schedules of member employees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Specifically, in July 2007, the $0.0026 fee will be
available to members with an average daily volume through the Nasdaq
Market Center in all securities during the month of: (i) More than
30 million shares of liquidity provided, and (ii) more than 55
million shares of liquidity accessed and/or routed; or: (i) More
than 25 million shares of liquidity provided, and (ii) more than 65
million shares of liquidity accessed and/or routed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\7\ in general, and with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among
members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system
which Nasdaq operates or controls. Nasdaq believes that the fee change
reflects an allocation of fees that recognizes the benefits to Nasdaq
market quality of liquidity provision and orders that access all
available liquidity in Nasdaq prior to routing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing proposed rule change has become effective upon filing
with the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \9\
and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\10\ in that the proposed rule change
establishes or changes a member due, fee, or other charge imposed by
the self-regulatory organization. At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NASDAQ-2007-064 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2007-064. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of Nasdaq. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2007-064 and should
be submitted on or before August 16, 2007.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-14386 Filed 7-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


The Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Applying Aluminum Parts --

Leachable Cadmium Data

Facility Name	City	State	Sample Date	Sample ID	Duplicate Indicator Leachable Actual or Calculated	Constituent Name	Leachable Result	Units Leachable Detection Limit mg/L	Leachable Detection Limit Data Qualifier Description

	N

cadmium

	BMW Manufacturing Corporation	SPARTANBURG	SC

MEP Analysis 1	N	actual	cadmium	0.001	mg/L	0.001

Ford MI Truck/Wayne Integrated Stamping & Assembly	WAYNE	MI

Drum #1	N	actual	cadmium	0.016	mg/L	0.045	J	The associated value is an estimated quantity.

Ford MI Truck/Wayne Integrated Stamping & Assembly	WAYNE	MI

Drum #3	N	actual	cadmium	0.009	mg/L	0.028	J	The associated value is an estimated quantity.

Ford Wixom Assembly Plant	WIXOM	MI

Drum #2	Y	actual	cadmium	0.002	mg/L	0.01	J	The associated value is an estimated quantity.

Ford Wixom Assembly Plant	WIXOM	MI

Drum #2 Duplicate	N	actual	cadmium	0.004	mg/L	0.01	J	The associated value is an estimated quantity.

GM Flint Truck	FLINT	MI

FT-1	N	actual	cadmium	0.008	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Flint Truck	FLINT	MI

FT-2	N	actual	cadmium	0.008	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Flint Truck	FLINT	MI

FT-3	N	actual	cadmium	0.01	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Flint Truck	FLINT	MI

FT-4	N	actual	cadmium	0.005	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Flint Truck	FLINT	MI

FT-5	N	actual	cadmium	0.01	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Flint Truck	FLINT	MI

FT-6	N	actual	cadmium	0.014	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Flint Truck	FLINT	MI

FT-7	N	actual	cadmium	0.013	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Grand River Plant	LANSING	MI

LGR-1	N	actual	cadmium	0.01	mg/L

	GM Grand River Plant	LANSING	MI

LGR-3	N	actual	cadmium	0.011	mg/L

	GM Grand River Plant	LANSING	MI

LGR-4	N	actual	cadmium	0.015	mg/L

	GM Grand River Plant	LANSING	MI

LGR-5	N	actual	cadmium	0.011	mg/L

	GM Grand River Plant	LANSING	MI

LGR-6	N	actual	cadmium	0.0076	mg/L

	GM Grand River Plant	LANSING	MI

LGR-7	N	actual	cadmium	0.0022	mg/L

	GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H1-1	N	actual	cadmium	0.006	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H1-2	N	actual	cadmium	0.006	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H1-3	N	actual	cadmium	0.007	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H1-4	N	actual	cadmium	0.005	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H1-5	N	actual	cadmium	0.005	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H1-6	N	actual	cadmium	0.005	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H1-7	N	actual	cadmium	0.007	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H2-2	N	actual	cadmium	0.005	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H2-4	N	actual	cadmium	0.006	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H2-5	N	actual	cadmium	0.004	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Hamtramck Plant	DETROIT	MI

H2-7	N	actual	cadmium	0.007	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Lansing Assembly Center	LANSING	MI	12/19/1997	LAN-S01-03	N	actual cadmium	0.009	mg/L

X	One of the two OWEP metals results was non-detect (TCLP or soxhlet).  The detection level was used in the calculation to be conservative.

GM Pontiac East Plant	PONTIAC	MI

PE-1	N	actual	cadmium	0.071	mg/L

	GM Pontiac East Plant	PONTIAC	MI

PE-2	N	actual	cadmium	0.09	mg/L

	GM Pontiac East Plant	PONTIAC	MI

PE-3	N	actual	cadmium	0.017	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Pontiac East Plant	PONTIAC	MI

PE-4	N	actual	cadmium	0.02	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Pontiac East Plant	PONTIAC	MI

PE-5	N	actual	cadmium	0.014	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Pontiac East Plant	PONTIAC	MI

PE-6	N	actual	cadmium	0.023	mg/L

J	Estimate

GM Pontiac East Plant	PONTIAC	MI

PE-7

actual

0.16	mg/L

J	Estimate

	n 	37

	MAXIMUM	0.16

	MEAN	0.0168595

	MEDIAN	0.008

	Std. Dev.	0.0297189

	90th Percentile	0.0212

	50th Percentile	0.008