[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24189-24190]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08618]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA--FEMA-2022-0014; OMB No. 1660-0073]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; National Urban Search and Rescue Response System

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: 60-Day notice of revision and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites
the general public to take this opportunity to comment on an extension,
with change, of a currently approved information collection. In
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice seeks
comments concerning the National Urban Search and Rescue Response
System to perform work on public or private lands essential to save
lives and protect property, including search and rescue and emergency
medical care, and other essential needs. FEMA will remove one
instrument from this collection.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 21, 2022.

ADDRESSES: To avoid duplicate submissions to the docket, please only
submit comments at www.regulations.gov under Docket ID FEMA--FEMA-2022-
0014. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    All submissions received must include the agency name and Docket
ID. Regardless of the method used for submitting comments or material,
all submissions will be posted, without change, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov, and will include any
personal information you provide. Therefore, submitting this
information makes it public. You may wish to read the Privacy and
Security Notice that is available via a link on the homepage of
www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Buddy Ey, Chief, Finance and
Administration Section, US&R Branch, FEMA, Response Directorate,
Operations Division at [email protected] or<PHONE_NUMBER>.
You may contact the Information Management Division for copies of the
proposed collection of information at email address: FEMA/[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 303 of the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act), 42 U.S.C.
5144, authorizes the President of the United States to form emergency
support teams of Federal personnel to be deployed to an area affected
by major disaster or emergency. Section 403(a)(3)(B) of the Stafford
Act provides that the President may authorize Federal Departments and
Agencies to perform work on public or private lands essential to save
lives and protect property, including search and rescue and emergency
medical care, and other essential needs. Section 327 of the Stafford
Act further authorizes the National Urban Search and Rescue Response
System (``the System'') and outlines the Administrator's authorization
to designate teams as well as outlines specific protections for System
members. The information collection activity is authorized under the
Office of Management and Budget circular, 2 CFR part 200, ``Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements
for Federal Awards.'' The collection contains information from the
programmatic and administrative activities of the Urban Search and
Rescue Sponsoring Agencies relating to the readiness and response
cooperative agreement awards.
    FEMA will remove one instrument from this collection: FEMA Form
089-0-15, Task Force Deployment Data.

Collection of Information

    Title: National Urban Search and Rescue Response System.
    Type of Information Collection: Extension, with change, of a
currently approved information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-0073.
    FEMA Forms: FEMA Form FF-104-FY-21-174 (formerly 089-0-10), Urban
Search Rescue Response System Narrative Statement Workbook; FEMA Form
FF-104-FY-21-175 (formerly 089-0-11), Urban Search Rescue Response
System Semi-Annual Performance Report; FEMA Form FF-104-FY-21-176
(formerly 089-0-12), Urban Search Rescue Response System Amendment
Form; FEMA Form FF-104-FY-21-177 (formerly 089-0-14), Urban Search
Rescue Response System Task Force Self-Evaluation Scoresheet; FEMA Form
FF-104-FY-21-179 (formerly 089-0-26), Vehicle Support Unit Purchase/
Replacement/Disposal Justification.
    Abstract: The information collection activity is the collection of
program and administrative information from 28 established Urban Search
and Rescue Sponsoring Agencies relating to the Readiness and Response
Cooperative Agreement awards. This information includes a narrative
statement used to evaluate a grantees' proposed use of funds, progress
reports to monitor progress on Cooperative Agreements, amendment
requests to change scope and period of performance and approval for
vehicle purchase.
    Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 126.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 182.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 364.
    Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost: $23,277.
    Estimated Respondents' Operation and Maintenance Costs: $0.
    Estimated Respondents' Capital and Start-Up Costs: $0.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost to the Federal Government: $135,866.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

Millicent Brown Wilson,
Records Management Branch Chief, Office of the Chief Administrative
Officer, Mission Support, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2022-08618 Filed 4-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-54-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 104 (Friday, May 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32375-32377]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11556]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG20-169-000.
    Applicants: Helios 5 MT, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Helios 5 MT, LLC.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200522-5108.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/12/20.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1436-001.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.

    Description: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. submits
tariff filing per 35.19a(b): Refund Report Entergy Operating Companies
to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200522-5143.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/12/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1742-002; ER19-2671-001; ER19-2672-001; ER19-
2595-001; ER19-2670-001; ER17-311-002; ER13-2490-006.
    Applicants: Hattiesburg Farm, LLC, SR Arlington II, LLC, SR
Arlington II MT, LLC, SR Hazlehurst III, LLC, SR Meridian III, LLC, SR
South Loving LLC, Simon Solar Farm LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of Hattiesburg
Farm, LLC, et. al.
    Filed Date: 5/21/20.
    Accession Number: 20200521-5211.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/11/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1059-001.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Deficiency Response--Western Energy
Imbalance Service Tariff to be effective 2/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200522-5187.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/12/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1060-001.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Deficiency Response--Western Energy
Imbalance Service Rate Schedule Tariff to be effective 2/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200522-5191.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/12/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1876-001.
    Applicants: Evergy Kansas Central, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Notice of Succession of Rate
Schedule, Supplemental to be effective 7/20/2020.
    Filed Date: 5/21/20.
    Accession Number: 20200521-5146.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/11/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1877-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: First Rev. ISA SA No. 3601 &
Original ICSA SA No. 5630; Queue No. V3-028/AB2-170 to be effective 4/
22/2020.
    Filed Date: 5/21/20.
    Accession Number: 20200521-5135.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/11/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1878-000.
    Applicants: Evergy Kansas South, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Notice of Succession Rate
Schedules & Service Agreements to be effective 7/20/2020.
    Filed Date: 5/21/20.
    Accession Number: 20200521-5139.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/11/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1879-000.
    Applicants: Oliver Wind I, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Oliver Wind I, LLC
Application for MBR Authorization to be effective 7/21/2020.
    Filed Date: 5/21/20.
    Accession Number: 20200521-5162.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/11/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1880-000.
    Applicants: Evergy Metro, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Notice of Succession Rate
Schedules & Service Agreements to be effective 7/20/2020.
    Filed Date: 5/21/20.
    Accession Number: 20200521-5169.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/11/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1881-000.
    Applicants: Tampa Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Emergency Interchange
Service Schedule A&B-2020 (Bundled) to be effective 5/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200522-5000.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/12/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1882-000.
    Applicants: Evergy Missouri West, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Notice of Succession Rate
Schedules & Service Agreements to be effective 7/21/2020.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200522-5001.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/12/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1883-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to Sch. 12-Appx A:
April 2020 RTEP, 30-Day Comment Period Requested to be effective 8/20/
2020.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200522-5058.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/12/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1884-000.
    Applicants: Invenergy Wilkinson Solar Holdings LLC.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of Market-
Based Rate Tariff to be effective 7/22/2020.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200522-5128.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/12/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1885-000.
    Applicants: Polaris Wind Energy LLC.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of Market-
Based Rate Tariff to be effective 7/22/2020.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200522-5147.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/12/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1886-000.
    Applicants: Appalachian Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power
Company, Kentucky Power Company, Kingsport Power Company, Ohio Power
Company, Wheeling Power Company, American Electric Power Service
Corporation, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: AEP East Operating Companies
submits revisions to OATT Att. H-14 re: Order 864 to be effective 1/27/
2020.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200522-5183.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/12/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1887-000.
    Applicants: GenOn Chalk Point, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Notice of Succession to be
effective 4/22/2020.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200522-5186.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/12/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1888-000.
    Applicants: AEP Appalachian Transmission Company, Inc, AEP Indiana
Michigan Transmission Company, Inc., AEP Kentucky Transmission Company,
Inc., AEP Ohio Transmission Company, Inc., AEP West Virginia
Transmission Company, Inc., American Electric Power Service
Corporation, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: AEP East Transmission Companies
submit revisions to OATT Att. H-20 re: Order 864 to be effective 1/27/
2020.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200522-5229.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/12/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1889-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Electric and Gas Company, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: PSEG submits Revisions to
PJM Tariff, Att. H-10 re: Order 864 to be effective 1/27/2020.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200522-5244.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/12/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1890-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2020-05-22 Intertie
Deviation Settlement--Initial Filing to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200522-5246.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/12/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1891-000.
    Applicants: Oliver Wind II, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Oliver Wind II, LLC Notice
of Succession to be effective 5/23/2020.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.

    Accession Number: 20200522-5247.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/12/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1892-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Limited waiver request of Midcontinent Independent
System Operator, Inc.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200522-5290.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/12/20.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 22, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-11556 Filed 5-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 85 (Thursday, May 2, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 18894]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09040]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the
Securities and Exchange Commission Small Business Capital Formation
Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Companies will hold a public
meeting on Monday May 6, 2019 at 1:00 p.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be held in Multi-Purpose Room LL-006 at the
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC.

STATUS: The meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. and will be open to the
public. Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Doors will
open at 12:30 p.m. Visitors will be subject to security checks. The
meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: On April 25, 2019, the Commission published
notice of the Committee meeting (Release No. 33-10634), indicating that
the meeting is open to the public and inviting the public to submit
written comments to the Committee. This Sunshine Act notice is being
issued because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting.
    The agenda for the meeting includes matters relating to rules and
regulations affecting small and emerging companies under the federal
securities laws.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information, please
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202)
551-5400.

    Dated: April 29, 2019.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-09040 Filed 4-30-19; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 43 (Monday, March 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 13818]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04450]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 4440-002]

Central Virginia Electric Cooperative, Harris Bridge Hydro LLC;
Notice of Transfer of Exemption

    1. On August 2, 2022, Central Virginia Electric Cooperative,
exemptee for the 400-kilowatt Harris Bridge Hydroelectric Project No.
4440, filed a letter notifying the Commission that the project was
transferred from Central Virginia Electric Cooperative to Harris Bridge
Hydro LLC. The exemption from licensing was originally issued on March
15, 1982.\1\ The project is located on the Rockfish River, Nelson
County, Virginia. The transfer of an exemption does not require
Commission approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Rockfish Corporation, 18 FERC ] 62,449 (1982). On November
13, 2012, the project was transferred to Central Virginia Electric
Cooperative.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Harris Bridge Hydro LLC is now the exemptee of the Harris Bridge
Hydroelectric Project No. 4440. All correspondence must be forwarded to
Mr. Frederic Reveiz, Managing Member, Harris Bridge Hydro LLC, 5425
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 600, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815, Phone: 202-
361-2092, Email: [email protected].

    Dated: February 27, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-04450 Filed 3-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 59 (Friday, March 27, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16327-16329]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07018]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 15

[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-0540]

Homeopathic Product Regulation: Evaluating the Food and Drug
Administration's Regulatory Framework After a Quarter-Century; Public
Hearing

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of public hearing; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a public
hearing to obtain information and comments from stakeholders about the
current use of human drug and biological products labeled as
homeopathic, as well as the Agency's regulatory framework for such
products. These products include prescription drugs and biological
products labeled as homeopathic and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs
labeled as homeopathic. FDA is seeking participants for the public
hearing and written comments from all interested parties, including,
but not limited to, consumers, patients, caregivers, health care
professionals, patient groups, and industry. FDA is seeking input on a
number of specific questions, but is interested in any other pertinent
information participants would like to share.

DATES: The public hearing will be held on April 20 and 21, 2015, from 9
a.m. to 4 p.m. The meeting may be extended or may end early depending
on the level of public participation. Register to attend or provide
oral testimony at the hearing by April 13, 2015. See Registration and
Request to Provide Oral Testimony for information on how to register or
make an oral presentation at the hearing. Written or electronic
comments will be accepted until June 22, 2015.

ADDRESSES: The public hearing will be held at FDA's White Oak Campus,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, rm. 1503A, Silver Spring, MD,
20993-0002. Participants must enter through Building 1 and undergo
security screening. For parking and security information, please refer
to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/WorkingatFDA/BuildingsandFacilities/WhiteOakCampusInformation/ucm241740.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lesley DeRenzo, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20903-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, FAX: 301-
847-8747<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Cynthia Ng, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD
20903-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Registration and Request to Provide Oral Testimony: The public
hearing is free and seating will be on a first-come, first-served
basis. If you wish to attend or make an oral presentation, see section
III (Attendance and/or Participation in the Public Hearing) for
information on how to register and the deadline for registration. If
you cannot attend in person, information about how you can access a
live Webcast will be located at https://collaboration.fda.gov/hprapril2015/.
    Comments and Transcripts: You may submit either electronic comments
regarding this document to http://www.regulations.gov or written
comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. You
should annotate and organize your comments to identify the specific
questions or topic to which they refer. It is only necessary to send
one set of comments. Please identify your comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the
docket at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Transcripts of the hearing will be available for review at the
Division of Dockets Management and at http://www.regulations.gov
approximately 45 days after the hearing. You may submit a request to
obtain a hard copy or CD-ROM transcript. Send your request to the
Division of Freedom of Information (ELEM-1029), Office of Management
Programs, Food and Drug Administration, 12420 Parklawn Dr., Element
Bldg., Rockville, MD 20857.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is evaluating its current enforcement
policies for drug products labeled as homeopathic from scientific,
risk, and process perspectives. The Agency is now soliciting opinions
about whether and how to adjust the current enforcement policies to
reflect changes in the homeopathic product marketplace over the last
approximately 25 years.

I. Background

A. Homeopathic Products and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

    The definition of a ``drug'' under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) includes: (1) Articles recognized in the
official United States Pharmacopoeia (USP), official Homoeopathic
Pharmacopoeia of the United States (HPUS); (2) articles intended for
use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of
disease in man or other animals; and (3) articles (other than food)
intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or
other animals. See section 201(g)(1)(A) to (C) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 321(g)(1)(A) to(C)). Accordingly, an article that meets this
definition of a ``drug'' is subject to regulation under the FD&C Act,
regardless of whether it is labeled as homeopathic. An article that
also meets the definition of a ``biological product'' (as defined in
section 351(i) of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) (42 U.S.C
262(i))) is subject to regulation under both the FD&C Act and the PHS
Act.
    The FD&C Act recognizes the HPUS, along with the USP, as an
official compendium. See section 201(j) of the FD&C Act. The HPUS is
produced by a non-governmental organization known as the Homeopathic
Pharmacop[oelig]ia Convention of the United States (HPCUS) and has been
in continuous publication since 1897 (Ref. 1). The HPCUS determines
which ingredients, including permissible potency levels, are officially
monographed homeopathic ingredients. To date, there are over 1200
officially monographed ingredients in the HPUS. Since 2004, the HPCUS
has added over 500 new ingredient monographs. The standards set forth
in the HPUS and the USP affect the naming, quality, and labeling of
drug products. See e.g., sections 501(b) and 502(g) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 351(b) and 352(g)).
    Nothing in the FD&C Act exempts drugs labeled as homeopathic from
any of the requirements related to approval, adulteration, and
misbranding, including labeling requirements. If a drug labeled as
homeopathic is a new drug under the FD&C Act, it is subject to the same
premarket approval requirements and the same standards for safety and
efficacy as all new drugs. A new drug is defined, in part, as any drug
that is not generally recognized, among experts qualified by scientific
training and experience to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of
drugs, as safe and effective for use under the condition prescribed,
recommended, or suggested in the labeling thereof. See section 201(p)
of the FD&C Act).

B. Homeopathic Drugs and the OTC Drug Review

    In 1972, FDA initiated rulemaking procedures (the OTC Drug Review)
to determine which OTC drugs are generally recognized among qualified
experts as safe and effective and not misbranded under prescribed,
recommended, or suggested conditions of use. See ``Procedures for
Classification of Over-the-Counter Drugs'' (37 FR 9464, May 11, 1972).
FDA deferred review of drugs labeled as homeopathic due to the
uniqueness of homeopathic medicine and stated that FDA would review
them as a separate category at a later time (37 FR 9464 at 9466). To
date, FDA has not reviewed this class of products for safety and
efficacy. Accordingly, there are currently no FDA monographs for drug
products labeled as homeopathic.

C. FDA's Compliance Policy Guide

    Since 1988, prescription and nonprescription drug products labeled
as homeopathic have been manufactured and distributed without FDA
approval under the enforcement policies set forth in FDA's Compliance
Policy Guide (CPG) 400.400 entitled ``Conditions Under Which
Homeopathic Drugs May be Marketed'' (see 53 FR 21728, June 9, 1988).
The CPG defines a homeopathic drug as any drug labeled as being
homeopathic which is listed in the HPUS, an addendum to it, or its
supplements. The CPG includes conditions specific to ingredients,
labeling, prescription status, and current good manufacturing practice.
The CPG can be found at http://www.fda.gov/iceci/compliancemanuals/compliancepolicyguidancemanual/ucm074360.htm.

D. Growth in the Sale of Drugs Labeled as ``Homeopathic''

    The homeopathic drug industry has continued on an upward growth
trajectory since FDA issued its CPG in 1988, especially with respect to
OTC drug products labeled as homeopathic. The CPG noted that, at the
time of original publication in 1988, the homeopathic drug market was a
multimillion dollar industry in the United States. In 2007, the
National Health Interview Survey, conducted by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics,
estimated that adults spent about $2.9 billion on the purchase of
homeopathic medicine (Ref. 2). Many drugs labeled as homeopathic are
sold OTC in major retail stores and are often marketed as natural,
safe, and effective alternatives to other prescription and
nonprescription products.

E. Safety of Drug Products Labeled as Homeopathic

    Drugs products labeled as homeopathic can contain a wide range of
substances, including ingredients derived from plants, healthy or
diseased animal or human sources, minerals, and chemicals (either as
active or inactive ingredients). As with ingredients in other drug and
biological products, homeopathic ingredients, even if highly diluted,
can cause side effects, drug interactions, and allergic or other
adverse reactions. Negative health effects from drug products labeled
as homeopathic have been reported through the FDA's Adverse Event
Reporting System and the National Poison Data System (NPDS), which is
maintained by the American Association of Poison Control Centers and
tracks human poison exposure cases. Data in the NPDS pertaining to
homeopathic drug products is tracked under the category ``Homeopathic
Agents.'' The 2012 American Association of Poison Control Center Annual
Report indicated that there were 10,311 reported poison exposure cases
related to ``Homeopathic Agents,'' with 8,788 of those reported cases
attributed to children 5 years of age and younger (Ref. 3). Of the
10,311 reported cases, 697 required treatment in a health care facility
(Id.).

II. Scope of the Public Hearing

    FDA is seeking broad public input on the current enforcement
policies related to drug products labeled as homeopathic in an effort
to better promote and protect the public health. FDA has developed a
list of questions to facilitate a more productive discussion at the
public hearing. This list is not intended to be exclusive, and FDA
encourages comments on other matters related to the development and
regulation of drug and biological products labeled as homeopathic.
Issues that are of specific interest to the Agency include the
following:
     What are consumer and health care provider attitudes
towards human drug and biological products labeled as homeopathic?
     What data sources can be identified or shared with FDA so
that the Agency can better assess the risks and benefits of drug and
biological products labeled as homeopathic?
     Are the current enforcement policies under the CPG
appropriate to protect and promote public health in light of the
tremendous growth in the

homeopathic drug market? Are there alternatives to the current
enforcement policies of the CPG that would inform FDA's regulatory
oversight of drugs labeled as homeopathic? If so, please explain.
     Are there areas of the current CPG that could benefit from
additional clarity? If so, please explain.
     Is there information regarding the regulation of
homeopathic products in other countries that could inform FDA's
thinking in this area?
     A large majority of human drug products labeled as
homeopathic are marketed as OTC drugs. These products are available for
a wide variety of indications, and many of these indications have never
been considered for OTC use under a formal regulatory process. What
would be an appropriate regulatory process for evaluating such
indications for OTC use?
     Given the wide range of indications on drug products
labeled as homeopathic and available OTC, what processes do companies
currently use to evaluate whether such products, including their
indications for use, are appropriate for marketing as an OTC drug?
     Do consumers and health care providers have adequate
information to make informed decisions about drug products labeled as
homeopathic? If not, what information, including, for example,
information in labeling, would allow consumers and health care
providers to be better informed about products labeled as homeopathic?

III. Attendance and/or Participation in the Public Hearing

    The public hearing is free and seating will be on a first-come,
first-served basis. If you wish to make an oral presentation during the
hearing, you must register by submitting either an electronic or a
written request by 5 p.m. on April 13, 2015, to Lesley DeRenzo or
Cynthia Ng (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Submit electronic
requests to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>You must provide your
name, title, business affiliation (if applicable), address, telephone
and fax numbers, email address, and type of organization you represent
(e.g., industry, consumer organization, etc.). You also should submit a
brief summary of the presentation, including the discussion topic(s)
that will be addressed and the approximate time requested for your
presentation. FDA encourages individuals and organizations with common
interests to coordinate and give a joint, consolidated presentation.
Registrants will receive confirmation once they have been accepted to
attend the meeting. FDA may limit both the number of participants from
individual organizations and the total number of attendees based on
space limitations. Registered presenters should check in before the
hearing.
    Participants should submit a copy of each presentation to Lesley
DeRenzo or Cynthia Ng (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) no later
than 5 p.m. on April 13, 2015. We will file the hearing schedule,
indicating the order and time allotted for each presenter, with the
Division of Dockets Management (see COMMENTS AND TRANSCRIPTS). FDA will
post an agenda of the public hearing and other background material at
least 3 days before the public hearing, along with additional
information, at: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/NewsEvents/ucm132703.htm
(select this hearing from the events list).
    We will mail, email, or telephone the schedule to each participant
before the hearing. In anticipation of the hearing presentations moving
ahead of schedule, participants are encouraged to arrive early to
ensure their designated order of presentation. Participants who are not
present when called risk forfeiting their scheduled time.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, contact
Lesley DeRenzo or Cynthia Ng (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) at
least 7 days in advance of the hearing.

IV. Notice of Hearing Under 21 CFR Part 15

    The Commissioner of Food and Drugs is announcing that the public
hearing will be held in accordance with part 15 (21 CFR part 15). A
presiding officer, who will be accompanied by FDA senior management
from the Office of the Commissioner and the relevant centers, will
conduct the hearing.
    Under Sec.  15.30(f), the hearing is informal and the rules of
evidence do not apply. Only the presiding officer and panel members may
question any person during or at the conclusion of each presentation
(Sec.  15.30(e)). Public hearings under part 15 are subject to FDA's
policy and procedures for electronic media coverage of FDA's public
administrative proceedings (21 CFR part 10, subpart C) (Sec.
10.203(a)). Under Sec.  10.205, representatives of the electronic media
may be permitted, subject to certain limitations, to videotape, film,
or otherwise record FDA's public administrative proceedings, including
presentations by participants. The hearing will be transcribed as
stipulated in Sec.  15.30(b). To the extent that the conditions for the
hearing as described in this document conflict with any provisions set
out in part 15, this notice acts as a waiver of those provisions as
specified in Sec.  15.30(h).

V. References

    The following references have been placed on display in the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) and may be seen by
interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
and are available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov. (FDA
has verified all the Web site addresses in this reference section, but
we are not responsible for any subsequent changes to the Web sites
after this document publishes in the Federal Register.)

1. The Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States (HPUS), ``What
is the HPUS?'', available at http://www.hpus.com/what-is-the-hpus.php (last visited Dec. 23, 2014).
2. Nahin, R. L., P. M. Barnes, B. J. Stussman, and B. Bloom, ``Costs
of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) and Frequency of
Visits to CAM Practitioners: United States, 2007.'' National Health
Statistics Reports; no 18. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for
Health Statistics, 2009.
3. James B. Mowry, et al., ``2012 Annual Report of the American
Association of Poison Control Centers' National Poison Data System
(NPDS): 30th Annual Report,'' 51 Clinical Toxicology, 949, 1188
(2013).

    Dated: March 20, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-07018 Filed 3-26-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: April 6, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 65)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 17332-17333]
[DOCID:fr06ap10-19]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 272

[EPA-R10-RCRA-2009-0868; FRL-9122-7]

Idaho: Incorporation by Reference of Approved State Hazardous
Waste Management Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to codify in the regulations entitled
``Approved State Hazardous Waste Management Programs,'' Idaho's
authorized hazardous waste program. The EPA will incorporate by
reference into the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) those provisions
of the State regulations that are authorized and that the EPA will
enforce under the Solid Waste Disposal Act, commonly referred to as the
Resource Conversation and Recovery Act (RCRA).

DATES: Send written comments by May 6, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Zach Hedgpeth, U.S. EPA, Region 10,
1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Mail Stop AWT-122, Seattle, Washington
98101. You may also submit comments electronically or through hand
delivery/courier; please follow the detailed instructions in the
ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule which is located in

the Rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zach Hedgpeth, U.S. EPA, Region 10,
1200 Sixth Avenue, Mail stop WCM-122, Seattle, Washington 98101, e-
mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>phone number<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of
this Federal Register, the EPA is codifying and incorporating by
reference the State's hazardous waste program as an direct final rule.
The EPA did not make a proposal prior to the direct final rule because
we believe these actions are not controversial and do not expect
comments that oppose them. We have explained the reasons for this
codification and incorporation by reference in the preamble to the
direct final rule. Unless we get written comments which oppose this
incorporation by reference during the comment period, the direct final
rule will become effective on the date it establishes, and we will not
take further action on this proposal. If we get comments that oppose
these actions, we will withdraw the direct final rule and it will not
take effect. We will then respond to public comments in a later final
rule based on this proposal. You may not have another opportunity for
comment. If you want to comment on this action, you must do so at this
time. For additional information, please see the direct final rule
published in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal
Register.

    Authority: This action is issued under the authority of sections
2002(a), 3006 and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste and Disposal Act, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).

    Dated: March 11, 2010.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2010-7649 Filed 4-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: July 21, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 138)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35774-35777]
[DOCID:fr21jy09-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-1365; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-076-AD;
Amendment 39-15970; AD 2009-15-07]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321
Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    In 2005 a lateral runway excursion occurred on an A320 aircraft.
Such excursions are classified as hazardous, with a large reduction
in safety margins. Investigation has shown that the aircraft landed
with the nose wheels rotated nearly 20 degrees from center. During
subsequent tests on the removed BSCU [Braking and Steering Control
Unit], a BSCU hardware failure was found, affecting the monitoring
function, including the system reconfiguration management, and
leading to a runaway of [the] Nose Wheel Steering [uncommanded
steering].
* * * * *
    The unsafe condition is an uncommanded steering condition during
takeoff or landing, which could result in departure of the airplane
from the runway. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct
the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective August 25, 2009.

    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of August 25,
2009.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Dulin, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2141; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on January 7, 2009 (74
FR 664). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    In 2005 a lateral runway excursion occurred on an A320 aircraft.
Such excursions are classified as hazardous, with a large reduction
in safety margins. Investigation has shown that the aircraft landed
with the nose wheels rotated nearly 20 degrees from center. During
subsequent tests on the removed BSCU [Braking and Steering Control
Unit], a BSCU hardware failure was found, affecting the monitoring
function, including the system reconfiguration management, and
leading to a runaway of [the] Nose Wheel Steering [uncommanded
steering].
    DGAC [Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile]
Airworthiness Directive (AD) F-1992-117-025(B), Revision 1 [which
corresponds to FAA AD 94-24-07], mandated the BSCU upgrade in order
to improve the steering logic, but this modification has shown not
to be sufficient to address the identified failure mechanism.
    A software modification is now implemented in BSCU standard 10
which improves the system reconfiguration management when this
failure mechanism is detected.
    BSCU standard 10 also includes other improvements--as detailed
in the associated Service Bulletin.
    This AD therefore mandates the modification or replacement of
the BSCU standard 7, 9 or 9.1, by the BSCU standard 10.

The unsafe condition is an uncommanded steering condition during
takeoff or landing, which could result in departure of the airplane
from the runway. The corrective action also includes replacement of
certain DUNLOP tires that are not compatible with BSCU standard 10. You
may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.

Support for the AD

    JetBlue Airways Corporation supports the actions specified in the
NPRM.

Request To Relocate Certain Language

    Airbus suggests that we relocate the following sentence in the
Reason section: ``An uncommanded steering condition during takeoff or
landing could result in departure of the airplane from the runway.''
Airbus states that relocating that sentence away from the previous
sentence, which addresses replacing tires, would avoid
misinterpretation by association.
    We acknowledge the Airbus comment and we have relocated the subject
sentence and clarified that it is the statement of the unsafe condition
in both the Discussion and Reason sections of this AD.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the change described previously. We determined that this
change will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 591 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 3 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $0 per product.
Where the service information lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge
for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators
to be $141,840, or $240 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone

(800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available
in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2009-15-07 Airbus: Amendment 39-15970. Docket No. FAA-2008-1365;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-076-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August
25, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114,
-115, -131, -132, and -133; A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, -232,
and -233; and A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
series airplanes; certificated in any category; equipped with one
conventional pre-Enhanced Manufacture and Maintainability (pre-EMM)
Braking and Steering Control Unit (BSCU), having the part numbers
specified in paragraph (c)(1), (c)(2), or (c)(3) of this AD.
    (1) C20216332292C (standard 7) installed by Airbus Modification
24449 in production, or by Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32-1124 in
service.
    (2) C202163372D32 (standard 9) installed by Airbus Modification
31106 in production, or by Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32-1227 or
A320-32-1232 in service.
    (3) C202163382D32 (standard 9.1) installed by Airbus
Modification 32500 in production, or by Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-32-1254 in service.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
gear.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    In 2005 a lateral runway excursion occurred on an A320 aircraft.
Such excursions are classified as hazardous, with a large reduction
in safety margins. Investigation has shown that the aircraft landed
with the nose wheels rotated nearly 20 degrees from center. During
subsequent tests on the removed BSCU [Braking and Steering Control
Unit], a BSCU hardware failure was found, affecting the monitoring
function, including the system reconfiguration management, and
leading to a runaway of [the] Nose Wheel Steering [uncommanded
steering].
    DGAC [Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile]
Airworthiness Directive (AD) F-1992-117-025(B), Revision 1 [which
corresponds to FAA AD 94-24-07], mandated the BSCU upgrade in order
to improve the steering logic, but this modification has shown not
to be sufficient to address the identified failure mechanism.
    A software modification is now implemented in BSCU standard 10
which improves the system reconfiguration management when this
failure mechanism is detected.
    BSCU standard 10 also includes other improvements--as detailed
in the associated Service Bulletin.
    This AD therefore mandates the modification or replacement of
the BSCU standard 7, 9 or 9.1, by the BSCU standard 10.

    The unsafe condition is an uncommanded steering condition during
takeoff or landing, which could result in departure of the airplane
from the runway. The corrective action also includes replacement of
certain DUNLOP tires that are not compatible with BSCU standard 10.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD: Modify
or replace the BSCU in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-32-1336,
Revision 01, dated January 10, 2008; and inspect the airplane to
determine if DUNLOP tires 46x16-20 having part number (P/N) 11659 T
or 11661 T are installed. If those tires are installed, before
further flight, replace with acceptable tires using a method
approved by either the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) (or its delegated agent). Accomplishment of the
applicable requirements in this paragraph terminates the
requirements of AD 94-24-07, amendment 39-9080.
    (2) Previous accomplishment of the modification or replacement
of the BSCU before the effective date of this AD in accordance with
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-32-1336, dated September 19,
2007, meets the requirements of paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1:  This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: Although the MCAI and service information do
not provide procedures for replacing the tires as specified in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, this AD requires that you replace the
tires using a method approved by either the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, FAA, or the EASA (or its delegated agent).

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Tim Dulin, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-2141; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2008-0048, dated
February 28, 2008; and Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-32-
1336, Revision 01, dated January 10, 2008; for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320-32-1336,
Revision 01, dated January 10, 2008, to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet
http://www.airbus.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 2, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-16937 Filed 7-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 23, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 79)]
[Notices]
[Page 21996-21997]
[DOCID:fr23ap08-138]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57679; File No. SR-CBOE-2008-45]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Increase Certain Taker Fees on the CBOE Stock Exchange

April 17, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 15, 2008, the Chicago Board Options

Exchange, Incorporated (``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have
been substantially prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has
designated this proposal as one establishing a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange under Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\
and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders it effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to modify its fees applicable to the CBOE
Stock Exchange (``CBSX''). The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.org/legal), at
the Exchange's principal office, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The CBSX Fees Schedule lists the fees applicable to trading on
CBSX. Those fees include transaction fees, which are based on whether
the executing member is ``taking'' liquidity or ``making'' liquidity in
connection with the transaction. Takers have been charged at a rate of
$0.0029 per share. This filing proposes to increase the taker
transaction fee for intermarket sweep orders (``ISOs'') and immediate-
or-cancel orders (``IOC orders'') that execute on CBSX to $0.0030 per
share. The taker transaction fee for other order types would remain
unchanged.
    The Exchange believes the proposed change will encourage order
providers to take advantage of order handling features available on
CBSX to non-IOC and non-ISO order types (such as the step-up flash
process \5\), while maintaining a fee structure that is competitive
with the transaction fees charged by other exchanges. The proposed
changes took effect on Wednesday, April 16, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See CBOE Rule 52.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \6\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \7\ in particular, in that it
is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among Exchange members and other persons using
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change establishes or changes a
due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange, it has become
effective upon filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \8\
and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder.\9\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-CBOE-2008-45 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2008-45. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2008-45 and should be
submitted on or before May 14, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-8784 Filed 4-22-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: April 9, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 67)]
[Notices]
[Page 16203-16204]
[DOCID:fr09ap09-51]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

March 26, 2009.
    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:
    Docket Numbers: RP07-504-002.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC submits Second Revised
Sheet 519 et al. to FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume 1, to be
effective 3/23/09.
    Filed Date: 03/23/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090324-0254.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 06, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-421-003.
    Applicants: Petal Gas Storage, L.L.C.
    Description: Petal Gas Storage LLC submits 2nd Substitute Fourth
Revised Sheet 113 et al. to FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume 1, to be
effective 7/25/09.
    Filed Date: 03/24/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090325-0125.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 06, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-282-001.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company.
    Description: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company submits Substitute
Fifth Revised Sheet 328 et al. to FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume
1, to be effective 2/26/09.
    Filed Date: 03/24/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090325-0127.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 06, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-412-001.
    Applicants: Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company.
    Description: Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company submits
Substitute Fifteenth Revised Sheet 724 et al. to FERC Gas Tariff,
Second Revised Volume 1, to be effective 3/1/09.
    Filed Date: 03/24/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090325-0126.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 06, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-465-001.

    Applicants: Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Kern River Gas Transmission Company withdraws their 3/
20/09 filing that revised the pro forma transportation service
agreements and provides substitutes.
    Filed Date: 03/25/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090326-0025.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 06, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-467-000.
    Applicants: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company submits
Notice of Contract Termination of the Transportation Service Agreement
with Beaird Co, Ltd, to be effective 4/23/09.
    Filed Date: 03/24/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090325-0124.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 06, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-468-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC submits First Revised
Sheet 1 et al. to FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 03/25/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090326-0026.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 06, 2009.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-8037 Filed 4-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


dwcgi 24672 1061330575 351609000. xls Table 1 Annual Agency and Respondent Burden/ Cost Estimates for Substantiation of CBI Claims Information Collection Activity Number Attorney Hours Attorney Wage/ Hr Manager Hours Manager Wage/ Hr Technical Hours Technical Wage/ Hr Clerical Hours Clerical Wage/ Hr Total Hours Per Request Total Costs Per Request Total Hours for All Requests Total Costs for All Requests Total Number of FOIA requests for CBI received by all EPA Program Offices and Regions per year 1384 Total number of other events ( e. g.,

litigation or rulemaking) that require EPA to examine the confidentiality of business information per year 617 Total number of EPA requests to industry for substantiation of CBI claims per year 543 Level of EPA effort to review information,

make a preliminary determination, and request substantiation from industry 543 4.00 $ 39.31 2.00 $ 33.26 1.00 $ 19.29 7.00 $ 243.05 3,801.00 $ 131,976.15 Number of respondents deciding not to submit substantiations per year 100 Level of industry effort to review the information claimed as confidential and decide not to comment 100 0.50 $ 33.22 0.50 $ 35.01 0.00 $ 17.05 1.00 $ 34.12 100.00 $ 3,412.00 Number of respondents submitting substantiations per year 443 Level of industry effort to respond to each substantiation request 443 2.20 $ 60.00 4.00 $ 33.22 7.00 $ 35.01 1.00 $ 17.05 14.20 $ 527.00 6,290.60 $ 233,461.00 Level of EPA effort to review each substantiation and make a final confidentiality determination 443 6.00 $ 39.31 2.00 $ 33.26 0.00 $ 19.29 8.00 $ 302.38 3,544.00 $ 133,954.34 Number of contractor/ subcontractor companies who are given access to CBI 129 Number of contractor/ subcontractor employees who must sign confidentiality agreements and the related level of effort 658 0.10 $ 33.22 0.00 0.00 0.10 $ 3.32 65.80 $ 2,184.56 Level of effort for contractor/ subcontractor businesses to file and maintain confidentiality agreements 129 0.00 0.00 0.50 $ 17.05 0.50 $ 8.53 64.50 $ 1,100.37 Total 13,865.90 $ 506,088.42 Hours and Costs Per Activity dwcgi 24672 1061330575 351609000. xls Table 1 Annual Agency and Respondent Burden/ Cost Estimates for Substantiation of CBI Claims KEY: Wage Rates for EPA Activities Attorney Wage/ Hr = Wage per hour for a GS 14 Step 5 Attorney.

Technical Wage/ Hr = Wage per hour for private industry Chemical engineers Clerical Wage/ Hr = Wage per hour for private industry supervisors, general office * Wages/ hr taken from the U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics " National Compensation Survey: Occupational Wages in the United States, 2001", Bulletin 2552,

( January 2003). Technical Wage/ Hr = Wage per hour for a GS 13 Step 5 Technical employee.

Clerical Wage/ Hr = Wage per hour for a GS 9 Step 5 Clerical/ Administrative employee.

* EPA wages/ hr taken from the U. S. Office of Personnel Management's 2003 General Schedule  Base Rates, Excluding Locality Rates of Pay Wage Rates for Industry and Contractor/ Subcontractor Activities Manager Wage/ Hr = Wage per hour for private industry Managers and adminstrators, n. e. c. dwcgi 24672 1061330575 351609000. xls Table 2 Annual Respondent Burden/ Cost Estimates for Substantiation of CBI Claims Information Collection Activity Number Attorney Hours Attorney Wage/ Hr Manager Hours Manager Wage/ Hr Technical Hours Technical Wage/ Hr Clerical Hours Clerical Wage/ Hr Total Hours Per Request Total Costs Per Request Total Hours for All Requests Total Costs for All Requests Read EPA's request for comments 100 0.20 $ 33.22 0.20 $ 35.01 0.00 $ 17.05 0.40 $ 13.65 40.00 $ 1,365.00 Review the information claimed as confidential and decide not to comment 100 0.30 $ 33.22 0.30 $ 35.01 0.00 $ 17.05 0.60 $ 20.47 60.00 $ 2,047.00 Subtotal 0.50 0.50 0.00 1.00 $ 34.12 100.00 $ 3,412.00 Read EPA's request for comments 443 0.20 $ 60.00 0.20 $ 33.22 0.20 $ 35.01 0.00 $ 17.05 0.60 $ 25.65 265.80 $ 11,362.95 Review the information claimed as confidential and decide to comment 443 1.00 $ 60.00 1.80 $ 33.22 3.80 $ 35.01 0.00 $ 17.05 6.60 $ 252.83 2,923.80 $ 112,003.69 Prepare and submit a substantiation to EPA 1.00 $ 60.00 2.00 $ 33.22 3.00 $ 35.01 1.00 $ 17.05 7.00 $ 248.52 3,101.00 $ 110,094.36 Subtotal 2.20 4.00 7.00 1.00 14.20 $ 527.00 6,290.60 $ 233,461.00 Number of contractor/ subcontractor companies who are given access to CBI 129 Number of contractor/ subcontractor employees who must sign confidentiality agreements and the related level of effort 658 0.10 $ 33.22 0.00 $ 35.01 0.00 $ 17.05 0.10 $ 3.32 65.80 $ 2,184.56 Level of effort for contractor/ subcontractor businesses to file and maintain confidentiality agreements 129 0.00 $ 33.22 0.00 $ 35.01 0.50 $ 17.05 0.50 $ 8.53 64.50 $ 1,100.37 Subtotal 0.10 0.00 0.50 0.60 $ 11.85 130.30 $ 3,284.93 Total 6,520.90 $ 240,157.93 Burden Hours and Costs by Employee Category * Wages/ hr taken from the U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics " National Compensation Survey: Occupational Wages in the United States, 2001", Bulletin 2552, ( January 2003). Technical Wage/ Hr = Wage per hour for private industry Chemical engineers Clerical Wage/ Hr = Wage per hour for private industry supervisors, general office KEY: Wage Rates for Industry and Contractor/ Subcontractor Activities Manager Wage/ Hr = Wage per hour for private industry Managers and adminstrators, n. e. c. dwcgi 24672 1061330575 351609000. xls Table 3 Annual Agency Burden/ Cost Estimates for Substantiation of CBI Claims Information Collection Activity Number Attorney Hours Attorney Wage/ Hr Technical Hours Technical Wage/ Hr Clerical Hours Clerical Wage/ Hr Total Hours Per Request Total Costs Per Request Total Hours for All Requests Total Costs for All Requests Total number of EPA requests to industry for substantiation of CBI claims per year 543 Review and make a preliminary determination whether business information may be entitled to confidential treatment 543 4.00 $ 39.31 1.00 $ 33.26 0.00 $ 19.29 5.00 $ 190.50 2,715.00 $ 103,441.50 Notify the affected business that EPA is making a confidentiality determination and provide an opportunity to comment 543 0.00 $ 39.31 1.00 $ 33.26 1.00 $ 19.29 2.00 $ 52.55 1,086.00 $ 28,534.65 Subtotal 7.00 $ 243.05 3,801.00 $ 131,976.15 Number of respondents submitting substantiations per year 443 Level of EPA effort to review the substantiation received and make a final determination whether the business information is entitled to confidential treatment 443 6.00 $ 39.31 2.00 $ 33.26 0.00 $ 19.29 8.00 $ 302.38 3,544.00 $ 133,954.34 Subtotal 8.00 $ 302.38 3,544.00 $ 133,954.34 Total 7,345.00 $ 265,930.49 Hours and Costs by Employee Category KEY: Wage Rates for EPA Activities * EPA wages/ hr taken from the U. S. Office of Personnel Management's 2003 General Schedule  Base Rates, Excluding Locality Rates of Pay Attorney Wage/ Hr = Wage per hour for a GS 14 Step 5 Attorney.

Technical Wage/ Hr = Wage per hour for a GS 13 Step 5 Technical employee.

Clerical Wage/ Hr = Wage per hour for a GS 9 Step 5 Clerical/ Administrative employee. dwcgi 24672 1061330575 351609000. xls Table 3 Annual Agency Burden/ Cost Estimates for Substantiation of CBI Claims


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 95 (Monday, May 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28265-28266]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11921]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP15-41-001]

Equitrans, L.P.; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on May 5, 2015, Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans) filed
an amendment, pursuant to section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act and Part
157 of the Commission's Regulations, for the Ohio Valley Connector
Project in West Virginia, and Ohio. The application of the project was
originally filed on December 30, 2014 in Docket No. CP15-41-000. The
amended filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-
free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to Paul
W. Diehl, Senior Counsel, Midstream, Equitrans, L.P., 625 Liberty
Avenue, Suite 1700, Pittsburgh, PA 15222. Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax
(412) 553-7781, and email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Equitrans states that after filing the original application,
Equitrans has continued working with landowners and other interested
parties with respect to the route of the pipeline and the specific
facilities that will be necessary. Also, after discussions with a
proposed shipper, Equitrans has determined that the proposed H-313
pipeline will not be required to provide the firm transportation
service. To accommodate this change, Equitrans proposes to eliminate
the H-313 pipeline from the scope of the project. The H-313 pipeline is
approximately 14.0 miles and 24-inch diameter. Equitrans also proposes
four minor re-routes of the proposed H-310 pipeline and changes of
facilities. The amendment does not affect the Ohio Valley Connector
Project's designed capacity of 850 MMcf/day.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 5 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to

participate is by filing with the Secretary of the Commission, as soon
as possible, an original and two copies of comments in support of or in
opposition to this project. The Commission will consider these comments
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a
comment alone will not serve to make the filer a party to the
proceeding. The Commission's rules require that persons filing comments
in opposition to the project provide copies of their protests only to
the party or parties directly involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of any mailed environmental documents, and will be notified of
any meetings associated with the Commission's environmental review
process. Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies
of filed documents on all other parties. However, the non-party
commenters will not receive copies of all documents filed by other
parties or issued by the Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the Commission) and will not have the
right to seek court review of the Commission's final order.
    Motions to intervene, protests and comments may be filed
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; see, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on June 2, 2015.

    Dated: May 12, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-11921 Filed 5-15-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01P