R 19J Honorable Jim Doyle Governor of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin 53707 Dear Governor Doyle:

Fine particle pollution represents one of the most significant barriers to clean air facing our nation today. These tiny particles   about 1/ 30th the diameter of a human hair   have been scientifically linked to serious human health problems. Their ability to be suspended in air for long periods of time makes them a public health threat far beyond the source of emissions. An important part of our nation's commitment to clean, healthy air deals with reducing levels of this fine particle ( PM2.5) pollution.

On June 2, 2003, the Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) requested State recommendations for designations for PM2.5 by February 15, 2004. We further solicited recommendations from you on May 19, 2004. However, we received no recommendations from Wisconsin.

Under the Clean Air Act ( CAA), EPA is required to promulgate designations for new or revised standards, such as the PM2.5 standard. We plan to promulgate final designations by November 2004.

The CAA defines a nonattainment area as any area that does not meet ( or that contributes to ambient air quality in a nearby area that does not meet) the national primary or secondary ambient air quality standard for the pollutant. EPA guidance indicates that Wisconsin should use the metropolitan area ( the larger of the Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area or Metropolitan Statistical Area) as the presumptive boundary for PM2.5 nonattainment areas. The guidance provides nine factors that Wisconsin should consider in determining whether to recommend a nonattainment area that deviates from the presumptive boundaries.

Kenosha County is part of the Chicago Gary Kenosha metropolitan area, which contains monitors in violation of the PM2.5 standard. 2 Therefore, Kenosha County is presumptively part of the Chicago Gary Kenosha PM2.5 nonattainment area. In the absence of an alternative recommendation from you, and justification for deviating from the presumptive nonattainment area, we intend to designate Kenosha County as nonattainment for the PM2.5 standard. We intend to designate the rest of the State as attainment/ unclassified.

You will hear from us again in November when EPA takes the final step in the PM2.5 designation process and determines those areas that are in attainment ( or unclassifiable) and those areas that areas that are nonattainment. For areas in attainment, the challenge will be not only to maintain, but also to continue the progress you have made toward clean air. It is a commitment to no backsliding in your State's clean air status for fine particles. EPA will also issue a proposed fine particle implementation rule prior to final designations, which will allow you to proceed with planning to achieve clean air.

The Bush Administration is addressing fine particle pollution with a comprehensive national clean air strategy. This strategy includes EPA's recent rule to reduce pollution from nonroad diesel engines, and the proposed rule to reduce pollution from power plants in the eastern U. S. These two rules are important components of EPA's efforts to help States and localities meet the more protective national fine particle and 8 hour ozone air quality standards. Together these rules will help all areas of the country achieve cleaner air.

We look forward to a continuing dialogue with Wisconsin as we work to finalize the designations for the PM2.5 standard. We have provided information to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources which you may find useful in evaluating whether Kenosha County should be designated nonattainment. We will review any future supporting information the State wishes to submit for our consideration. If you would like to provide additional information about the area in question, please provide this information by September 1, 2004. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Very truly yours,

Bharat Mathur, Acting Regional Administrator 3 cc: P. Scott Hassett, Secretary Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Renee Cipriano, Director Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 4 standard bccs: official file copy originator's file copy originating organization reading file other bcc's: K. Hudson ( ORA) ORA Reading file R. Cestaric R. Damberg, OAQPS ( electronic copy) L. Wallace, OAQPS ( electronic copy) L. Eagan, WDNR N. Karim F. Williams S. Holloway


[Federal Register: November 24, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 227)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 70883-70886]
[DOCID:fr24no08-9]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0590; FRL-8732-4]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Imperial
County Air Pollution Control District, Mojave Desert Air Quality
Management District, South Coast Air Quality Management District, and
Ventura County Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
Imperial County Air Pollution Control District (ICAPCD), Mojave Desert
Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD), South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD), and Ventura County Air Pollution Control
District (VCAPCD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These revisions concern volatile organic compound (VOC)
emissions from storage of reactive organic compound liquids, polyester
resin operations, coatings of metal parts and products, and adhesives
and sealants. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission
sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: This rule is effective on January 23, 2009 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by December 24, 2008. If
we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will
not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2008-0590, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region
IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents
in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment
during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions regarding ICAPCD Rule
414, contact Mae Wang, EPA Region IX,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
For questions regarding MDAQMD Rule 1162, contact Jerald Wamsley, EPA
Region IX,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>For questions
regarding SCAQMD Rule 1107 or VCAPCD Rule 74.20, contact Francisco
D[oacute][ntilde]ez, EPA Region IX,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rules did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of these rules?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
    B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. EPA Recommendations to Further Improve the Rules
    D. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rules did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rules we are approving with the dates that they
were

adopted by the local air agencies and submitted by the California Air
Resources Board.

                                                                Table 1--Submitted Rules
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Agency                      Rule                  Rule title                    Adopted        Submitted       Complete
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ICAPCD.........................................             414  Storage of Reactive Organic Compound           05/18/04        07/19/04        08/10/04
                                                                  Liquids.
MDAQMD.........................................            1162  Polyester Resin Operations.............        08/27/07        03/07/08        04/17/08
SCAQMD.........................................            1107  Coating of Metal Parts and Products....        01/06/06        05/08/07        07/23/07
VCAPCD.........................................           74.20  Adhesives and Sealants.................        01/11/05        07/15/05        08/18/05
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On the dates listed above, these rule submittals were found to meet
the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix V, which must be
met before formal EPA review.

B. Are there other versions of these rules?

    ICAPCD Rule 414 was originally adopted on December 11, 1979. This
version of the rule was approved into the SIP on January 27, 1981 (46
FR 8472). Rule 414 was later revised on September 14, 1999, and
proposed for a limited approval/limited disapproval on July 7, 2003 (68
FR 40233). This proposed action was never finalized. If the May 18,
2004, version of Rule 414 is approved into the SIP, then it will
replace the existing SIP-approved version (adopted on December 11,
1979) as well as the SIP-approved version of ICAPCD Rule 413,
Definitions, that was also adopted on December 11, 1979, and approved
into the SIP on January 27, 1981 (46 FR 8472). Rule 413, Definitions,
has already been replaced by the ICAPCD with more recent rules, and is
no longer an active District rule. The superseding of existing SIP
ICAPCD Rule 413, Definitions, should not be confused with another SIP
ICAPCD Rule also numbered 413, Organic Solvent Cleaning (see 67 FR
67314, November 5, 2002).
    The MDAQMD inherited a version of South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1162, Polyester Resin Operations,
amended by the SCAQMD on December 7, 1990, that is in the SIP for the
Blythe/Palo Verde Valley portion of the MDAQMD. If the August 27, 2007,
version of MDAQMD Rule 1162 is approved into the SIP, then it will
apply throughout MDAQMD and replace the December 7, 1990, version of
SCAQMD Rule 1162 that is in effect in the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley
area.
    We approved a version of SCAQMD Rule 1107 into the SIP on August
13, 2002 (67 FR 52611). We approved a version of VCAPCD Rule 74.20 into
the SIP on December 4, 2003 (68 FR 67805).

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?

    VOCs help produce ground-level ozone and smog, which harm human
health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States
to submit regulations that control VOC emissions.
    ICAPCD Rule 414 reduces VOC emissions from storage tanks with
capacities of 1,500 gallons or more that store reactive organic
compound liquids. The rule expands the applicability of the equipment
requirements, and adds testing methods, reporting and recordkeeping
requirements. MDAQMD Rule 1162 limits VOC emissions from operations
that use polyester resin material to fabricate, rework, repair, or
touch-up products for commercial, military, or industrial uses. The
rule applies across the entire district, and sets more stringent
emission limits and updates work practice standards. SCAQMD Rule 1107
reduces VOC emissions from the coating of metal parts and products.
SCAQMD Rule 1107 reduces the emissions limits for some coatings,
increases the required efficiency of alternative coating application
methods and air pollution control devices, and adds an exemption for
some applications of liquid photoresist coating. VCAPCD Rule 74.20
limits emissions of reactive organic compounds resulting from the
application of adhesives, adhesive primers, sealants, sealant primers,
and solvents associated with these products. VCAPCD Rule 74.20 adds an
exemption for glass bonding and priming processes in automobile
convertible top manufacturing operations. EPA's technical support
documents (TSDs) have more information about these rules.

II. EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?

    Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the
Act), must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for
each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guideline
(CTG) document as well as each major source in nonattainment areas (see
section 182(a)(2)), and must not relax existing requirements (see
sections 110(l) and 193). The ICAPCD, MDAQMD, SCAQMD and the VCAPCD
regulate ozone nonattainment areas (see 40 CFR part 81), so ICAPCD Rule
414, MDAQMD Rule 1162, VCAPCD Rule 74.20 and SCAQMD Rule 1107 must
fulfill RACT.
    Guidance and policy documents that we use to help evaluate specific
enforceability and RACT requirements consistently include the
following:
    1. Portions of the proposed post-1987 ozone and carbon monoxide
policy that concern RACT, 52 FR 45044, November 24, 1987.
    2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook).
    3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).
    4. ``Control Technique Guideline: Control of Volatile Organic
Emissions from Petroleum Liquid Storage in External Floating Roof
Tanks,'' EPA, December 1978, EPA-450/2-78-047.
    5. ``Control Technique Guideline: Control of Volatile Organic
Emissions from Petroleum Liquid Storage in Fixed Roof Tanks,'' EPA,
December 1977, EPA-450/2-77-036.
    6. ``Control Technique Guideline: Control of Volatile Organic
Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources Volume VI: Surface Coating
of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products,'' EPA, June 1978, EPA-450/2-
78-01.
    7. ``Determination of Reasonably Available Control Technology and
Best Available Retrofit Control Technology for Adhesives and
Sealants,'' California Air Resources Board, December 1998.

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?

    We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and
guidance regarding enforceability, RACT, and SIP

relaxations. In SCAQMD Rule 1107, the potential excess VOC emissions
from the added exemption total 0.03 percent of total controlled VOC
emissions from this source category; these emissions are therefore
considered de minimis under Section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act. The
remaining amendments to Rule 1107 clearly strengthen the rule
requirements. In VCAPCD Rule 74.20, the estimated excess emissions from
the added exemption total less than 0.1 percent of the VCAPCD's total
reactive organic gas emissions from this source category, and are
therefore considered de minimis under Section 110(l) of the Clean Air
Act. The TSDs have more information on our evaluations.

C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules

    At present, EPA has no recommendations to further improve ICAPCD
Rule 414, SCAQMD Rule 1107, or VCAPCD Rule 74.20. Regarding MDAQMD Rule
1162, we recommend that MDAQMD adopt an overall control efficiency of
90%. MDAQMD should also re-evaluate the exemptions in the rule. The TSD
for MDAQMD Rule 1162 has more details on our recommendations.

D. Public Comment and Final Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully
approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all
relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance.
However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are
simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rules. If we
receive adverse comments by December 24, 2008, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct
final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in
a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive
timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on January 23, 2009. This will incorporate the
rules into the federally enforceable SIP.
    Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 23, 2009. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: October 2, 2008.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

0
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(332)(i)(A)(4) and
(c)(337)(i)(B)(3) and (c)(350)(i)(D)(1) and (c)(354)(i)(B)(1) to read
as follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

    (332) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (4) Rule 414, Storage of Reactive Organic Compound Liquids, adopted
on December 11, 1979, and revised on May 18, 2004.
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (337) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) * * *
    (3) Rule 74.20, Adhesives and Sealants, adopted on June 8, 1993,
and revised on January 11, 2005.
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (350) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (D) South Coast Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rule 1107, Coating of Metal Parts and Products, adopted on June
1, 1979, and amended on January 6, 2006.
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (354) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rule 1162, Polyester Resin Operations, adopted on August 27,
2007.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-27735 Filed 11-21-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must

submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House
of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States.
EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until
60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is
not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 8, 2019. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action, on Pennsylvania's RACT II Rule, may not be
challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See
section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: April 25, 2019.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart NN--Pennsylvania

0
2. In Sec.  52.2020, the table in paragraph (c)(1) is amended by
adding:
0
a. Under ``Chapter 121--General Provisions,'' an entry for ``Section
121.1'' after an existing entry for ``Section 121.1''; and
0
b. Under ``Chapter 129--Standards for Sources,'' after the entry for
``129.95'', a subheading entitled ``Additional RACT Requirements for
Major Sources of NOX and VOCs'' and the entries ``Section
129.96'' through ``Section 129.100'' in numerical order.
    The additions read as follows:

Sec.  52.2020  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          State                          Additional explanation/
         State citation             Title/subject    effective date   EPA approval date  Sec.   52.2063 citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Title 25--Environmental Protection Article III--Air Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         Chapter 121--General Provisions

                                                  * * * * * * *
Section 121.1..................  Definitions.......         4/23/16  5/9/19, [insert     Revises the following
                                                                      Federal Register    definitions: ``CEMS--
                                                                      citation].          Continuous emission
                                                                                monitoring system,''
                                                                                ``Major NOX emitting
                                                                                facility,'' ``Major
                                                                                VOC emitting
                                                                                facility,'' and
                                                                                ``Stationary internal
                                                                                combustion engine or
                                                                                stationary
                                                                                reciprocating internal
                                                                                combustion engine.''
                                                                                Adds new definitions
                                                                                for the following
                                                                                terms: ``Process
                                                                                heater,'' ``Refinery
                                                                                gas,'' ``Regenerative
                                                                                cycle combustion
                                                                                turbine,'' ``Simple
                                                                                cycle combustion
                                                                                turbine,'' and
                                                                                ``Stationary
                                                                                combustion turbine.''

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  * * * * * * *
                                       Chapter 129--Standards for Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  * * * * * * *
                         Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NOX and VOCs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 129.96.................  Applicability.....         4/23/16  5/9/19, [insert     New section.
                                                                      Federal Register
                                                                      citation].
Section 129.97.................  Presumptive RACT           4/23/16  5/9/19, [insert     New section.
                                  requirements,                       Federal Register
                                  RACT emission                       citation].
                                  limitations, and
                                  petition for
                                  alternative
                                  compliance
                                  schedule.
Section 129.98.................  Facility-wide or           4/23/16  5/9/19, [insert     Conditionally approved.
                                  system-wide NOX                     Federal Register    See 40 CFR 52.2023(m).
                                  emissions                           citation].
                                  averaging plan
                                  general
                                  requirements.
Section 129.99.................  Alternative RACT           4/23/16  5/9/19, [insert     Conditionally approved.
                                  proposal and                        Federal Register    See 40 CFR 52.2023(m).
                                  petition for                        citation].
                                  alternative
                                  compliance
                                  schedule.
Section 129.100................  Compliance                 4/23/16  5/9/19, [insert     New section.
                                  demonstration and                   Federal Register
                                  recordkeeping                       citation].
                                  requirements.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

0
3. Section 52.2023 is amended by adding reserved paragraph (l) and
adding paragraph (m) to read as follows:

Sec.  52.2023  Approval status.

* * * * *
    (m) EPA conditionally approves Pennsylvania's 25 Pa Code sections
129.98 and 129.99 submitted on May 16, 2016 to address the reasonably
available control technology (RACT) requirements under CAA sections
182(b)(2)(C), 182(f), and 184 under the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. Pursuant to CAA section 110(k)(4), this conditional approval is
based upon a September 26, 2017 letter from Pennsylvania to submit to
EPA, no later than 12 months from EPA's final conditional approval,
additional SIP revisions to address the deficiencies identified. The
SIP revisions, to be submitted by Pennsylvania, include:
    (1) All facility-wide or system-wide averaging plans approved by
PADEP under 25 Pa Code 129.98 including but not limited to any terms
and conditions that ensure the enforceability of the averaging plan as
a practical matter, and
    (2) All source-specific RACT determinations approved by PADEP under
25 Pa Code 129.99, including any alternative compliance schedules
approved under Sec. Sec.  129.97(k) and 129.99(i); the source-specific
RACT determinations submitted to EPA for approval into the SIP shall
include any terms and conditions that ensure the enforceability of the
source-specific RACT emission limitation as a practical matter.
[FR Doc. 2019-09478 Filed 5-8-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, DC 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES PC Code: 1090001 DP Code: D281176 MEMORANDUM DATE: April 15, 2002 SUBJECT: Tier II Estimated Drinking Water Concentrations ( EDWCs) for Human Health Risk for oxadiazon on Florida Golf Course TO: Veronique LaCapra, Chemical Review Manager Margaret Rice, Branch Chief Special Review and Reregistration Division ( 7508C)

FROM: Faruque A. Khan, Ph. D., Environmental Scientist José Luis Meléndez, Chemist Environmental Fate and Effects Division THROUGH: Mah T. Shamim, Ph. D., Chief Jean Holmes, Biologist, RAPL Environmental Risk Branch V Environmental Fate and Effects Division This memo presents the Tier II surface drinking water assessment for oxadiazon. The EDWCs for oxadiazon were based on the proposed maximum application rate ( 8.0 lbs a. i./ A, 3 applications) on golf coarse, which constitute the major use of the chemical. The mean values of EDWCs over a 36 year period based on Florida Turf Scenario for various segments of the golf course ( green, tees, fairways, and rough ) are summarized in Table 1. Adjustments can be made to calculate cumulative EDWCs for various segments of the golf coarse by adding EECs for each segment of interest. For example, the sum of the chronic EDWCs for green, tees and , fairways would be 20.73 ( i. e. 2.10+ 18.63) µ g L 1.

Table 1. Recommended EDWCs of Oxadiazon for human health risk assessment.

Exposure Greens & Tees Fairways Roughs Golf Coarse ( µ g L 1)

Acute ( 1/ 10 peak value) 7.7 44.28 128.65 180.63 Non cancer Chronic ( 1/ 10 yearly value) 2.76 15.87 46.24 64.87 Cancer Chronic ( Mean 36 year annual concentration) 2.10 18.63 35.22 55.95 Note: µ g L 1 = ppb 2 1.0 Estimation of surface water exposure concentrations The maximum application rate and relevant environmental fate parameters for oxadiazon were used in the Tier II model ( PRZM/ EXAMS) for EDWCs in the surface water. The output of the screening model represent an upper bound estimate of the concentrations of oxadiazon that might be found in surface water due to use of oxadiazon on golf coarse.

2.0 Background Information on PRZM/ EXAMS simulation PRZM/ EXAMS modeling using the Index Reservoir ( IR) and the Percent Crop Area ( PCA) adjustment was used to estimate concentrations in surface water used as a source of drinking water. The index reservoir represents a watershed that is more vulnerable than most used as drinking water sources. It was developed from a real watershed in western Illinois. The index reservoir is used as a standard watershed that is combined with local soils, weather, and cropping practices to represent a vulnerable watershed for each crop that could support a drinking water supply. If a community derives its drinking water from a large river, the estimated exposure would likely be higher than the actual exposure. Conversely, a community that derives its drinking water from smaller bodies of water with minimal outflow would likely get higher drinking water exposure than estimated using the index reservoir. Areas with a more humid climate that use a similar reservoir and golf coarse turf management practices would likely get more pesticides in their drinking water than predicted levels.

A single steady flow has been used to represent the flow through the reservoir. Discharge from the reservoir also removes chemical from it so this assumption will underestimate removal from the reservoir during wet periods and overestimates removal during dry periods. This assumption can both underestimate or overestimate the concentration in the reservoir depending upon the annual precipitation pattern at the site. The index reservoir scenario uses the characteristic of a single soil to represent all soils in the basin. Soils can vary substantially across even small areas, thus, this variation is not reflected in these simulations.

The index reservoir scenario does not consider tile drainage. Areas that are prone to substantial runoff are often tile drained. This may underestimate exposure, particularly on a chronic basis ( the watershed on which the IR is based had no documented tile drainage). Additionally, EXAMS is unable to easily model spring and fall turnover which would result in complete mixing of a chemical through the water column during these events. Because of this inability, Shipman City Lake has been simulated without stratification. There is data to suggest that Shipman City Lake does stratify in the deepest parts of the lake at least in some years. This may result in both an over and underestimation of the concentration in drinking water depending upon the time of the year and the depth the drinking water intake is drawing from. A full description of the Index Reservoir is provided in the " Guidance for Use of the Index Reservoir in Drinking Water Exposure Assessment" from EFED upon request.

Development a Percent Crop Area ( PCA), watershed based adjustment factor for the percent of land in production for golf coarse has not been performed. Therefore, the drinking water concentrations for oxadiazon were estimated using adjusting factors recommended in the EFED guidance document for the turf scenario ( Carleton, et. al., 2001). The predicted concentrations are multiplied by 0.04 ( fractional area analogous to PCA) for an average green and tee areas, 0.23 ( fractional area analogous to PCA) for fairways, and an average 0.67 ( fractional area analogous to PCA) for roughs ( Appendix A). These multipliers were comparable to the surveyed data conducted by the Golf Course Superintends 3 Table 2. PRZM/ EXAM Input Parameters for Oxadiazon Parameters and Units Oxadiazon Source PC Code 1090001 Molecular Weight ( g Mole 1) 345.2 Product Chemistry Vapor pressure ( Torr) 1.0 E 6 Product Chemistry Water solubility ( mg L 1) * 1.0 Product Chemistry Hydrolysis half life @ pH 5 ( Days) Stable MRID 41863603 Hydrolysis half life @ pH 7 ( Days) Stable MRID 41863603 Hydrolysis half life @ pH 9 ( Days) 38 MRID 41863603 Aerobic soil metabolism t ½ , ( Days)* 841 MRID 42772801 Aerobic aquatic metabolism ( Days)* 1682** EFED Guidence Anaerobic aquatic metabolism ( Days)*

365 MRID 42773802 Direct Aqueous Photolysis ( Days) 2.75 MRID 41897201 Soil Water Partition Coefficient ( Koc, L Kg 1) 2352 MRID 1898202 Florida Turf Management Pesticide Application Rates ( lbs a. i./ A) 2.0 and 4.0 SRRD Application Frequency 2X and 1X SRRD Application Interval ( days) 30 and 135 SRRD First Application Date March 15 SRRD Spray Efficiency 99% EFED Spray Drift 6.40% EFED PCA*** Green and Tees Fairways Roughs 4.00% 23.00% 67.00% EFED * = Water solubility was multiplied by 10 according to Guidance for selecting input parameters in modeling for environmental fate and transport of * = Selected input parameters were multiplied by 3 according to Guidance for selecting input parameters in modeling for environmental fate and ** = 2X of soil aerobic metabolismhalf life input value.

*** = Fractional use area analogous to percent crop area Association of America. They reported that an average for teeing areas is 2%, putting green 2%, fairways 23%, rough/ wood/ water 70%, and building and grounds 3% and that an average of 150 200 acres of total land is used for an 18 hole golf course facility.

The linked PRZM and EXAM model is typically used by EFED in estimating pesticides concentrations in surface waters. PRZM is employed to evaluate runoff loading to a receiving surface body. As soon as the pesticides residues reaches the surface water, EXAMS uses algorithms to estimate the 4 pesticides concentrations by taking into account different dissipation mechanisms in the aqueous and sediment phases, weather patterns, and periodic application of pesticides for several years.

3.0 Florida Turf Scenario This scenario based on the the EFED standard citrus scenario, models a field located in Osceola County, Florida in the Adamsville sand, a hyperthermic, uncoated Aquic Quartzipsamment in MLRA 156A. The Adamsville sand is a somewhat poorly drained, rapidly permeable soil that formed in thick sandy marine sediments occurring in Central and Southern Florida on slopes of 0 5 percent. Adamsville sand ranges from a Hydrologic Group A soil to a Hydrologic Group C soil, depending on the water table. For the purpose of this modeling, EFED used the curve numbers from the PIC of the Adamsville sand as a Group C soil. Runoff from application on turf was modeled using the EFED standard turf scenario ( Carleton, et. al., 2001).

To develop a turf scenario the citrus scenario was modified by adding a 2 cm thick layer of A thatch@ on top of the soil profile. The thatch layer has the following properties: bulk density = 0.37; field capacity = 0.47; wilting point = 0.27; organic carbon = 7.5%. Curve numbers were selected based on A good condition@ open space areas as specified in TR 55, that for hydrologic soil groups. A 2 cm layer of thatch is typical for golf course fairways, but is probably thicker than average for golf course greens.

Turf is considered to be essentially generic, with no distinction made between sod farms, golf course fairways, greens and tees, or residential lawns. For chemicals applied to golf courses, the fraction of the total area composed of greens, tees, and fairways may, however be used to modify the results of a modeling run, somewhat in the fashion of a percent cropped area ( PCA) adjustment. The approximate average percent areas ( confirmed by Mike Kenna, USGA, personal communication) are as follows: fairways, 23%; greens, 2%; tees, 2%. Thus if a pesticide is only used on greens and tees, for example, the modeling results would be multiplied by a factor of 0.04.

4.0 Modeling Inputs and Results The weather, golf coarse management practices, and oxadiazon applications were simulated over 36 years so that the ten year excedence probability at the site could be estimated. The EDWC's generated in this analysis were estimated using PRZM 3.12 ( Pesticide Root Zone Model ) for simulating runoff and erosion from the agricultural field and EXAMS 2.97.5 ( Exposure Analysis Modeling System) for estimating environmental fate and transport in surface water. Table 2 summarizes the input values used in the Florida Golf Coarse model run for PRZM/ EXAMS. Attached to this memo is a copy of the printout generated from the PRZM/ EXAMS run ( See Appendix A).

5.0 References Carleton, J., J. Lin, and M. Corbin. 2002. Development of a modeling approach to estimate runoff of pesticide residues from managed turf grass. Memorandum issued on February 27, 2002 on the subject " PRZM Standard Crop/ Location Scenarios, Procedure to Develop and Approve New Scenarios, and PRZM Turf Modeling Scenarios to Date" by Elizabeth Leovey, Acting Director of Environmental Fate And Effect Division of the Office of Pesticides, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D. C.

EFFD Guidance document. 2001. Guidance for selecting input parameters in modeling for environmental fate and transport of pesticides. Version II. December 4, 2001. 5 Appendix A Florida Turf( 2.00 lbs X 2X and 4.00 lbs X 1X applications)

Chemical: Oxadiazon PRZM environment: FLOXATRF. inp EXAMS environment: INDEXRES. EXV Metfile: met156A. met WATER COLUMN DISSOLVED CONCENTRATION ( PPB)

YEAR PEAK 96 HOUR 21 DAY 60 DAY 90 DAY YEARLY        1948 242.000 236.000 215.000 180.000 160.000 50.980 1949 112.000 109.000 101.000 90.350 83.690 63.400 1950 74.410 72.960 68.120 58.650 53.490 38.110 1951 73.530 72.160 66.680 56.480 51.260 39.540 1952 210.000 205.000 187.000 154.000 139.000 63.590 1953 105.000 103.000 99.710 87.230 79.180 60.070 1954 92.800 91.020 85.580 77.490 71.290 53.220 1955 63.750 62.710 59.680 53.670 49.610 40.750 1956 55.700 54.680 52.380 50.060 47.080 33.150 1957 161.000 157.000 143.000 119.000 112.000 66.870 1958 169.000 166.000 151.000 129.000 115.000 66.050 1959 113.000 111.000 104.000 89.500 82.190 59.850 1960 140.000 137.000 128.000 116.000 106.000 67.850 1961 85.600 84.050 78.420 73.590 68.740 52.540 1962 68.250 67.010 62.160 56.550 56.250 42.300 1963 111.000 109.000 102.000 88.070 78.290 49.370 1964 107.000 105.000 96.260 90.100 86.820 60.240 1965 148.000 145.000 133.000 122.000 108.000 62.890 1966 109.000 107.000 100.000 94.900 87.020 71.590 1967 109.000 107.000 103.000 95.120 88.300 65.750 1968 112.000 111.000 108.000 101.000 94.220 67.920 1969 79.310 78.140 72.690 63.590 56.750 45.180 1970 98.620 96.960 90.130 76.970 69.270 50.640 1971 84.820 83.200 77.290 68.930 63.760 44.640 1972 93.450 91.590 84.920 79.580 74.520 48.020 1973 50.060 49.180 46.770 42.220 39.300 31.670 1974 63.840 62.890 58.230 49.290 46.990 34.390 1975 40.150 39.430 36.700 32.370 31.470 26.370 1976 54.370 53.310 49.600 45.990 43.700 33.380 1977 235.000 232.000 214.000 198.000 181.000 87.790 1978 67.640 66.730 63.140 56.240 52.850 40.150 1979 185.000 181.000 170.000 144.000 130.000 73.100 1980 84.110 82.580 78.420 70.970 64.470 53.390 1981 101.000 99.370 92.320 78.970 72.440 47.590 1982 107.000 105.000 102.000 96.830 92.650 59.920 1983 54.200 53.310 50.180 46.460 45.450 39.870 SORTED FOR PLOTTING

PROB PEAK 96 HOUR 21 DAY 60 DAY 90 DAY YEARLY        0.027 242.000 236.000 215.000 198.000 181.000 87.790 0.054 235.000 232.000 214.000 180.000 160.000 73.100 6 0.081 210.000 205.000 187.000 154.000 139.000 71.590 0.108 185.000 181.000 170.000 144.000 130.000 67.920 0.135 169.000 166.000 151.000 129.000 115.000 67.850 0.162 161.000 157.000 143.000 122.000 112.000 66.870 0.189 148.000 145.000 133.000 119.000 108.000 66.050 0.216 140.000 137.000 128.000 116.000 106.000 65.750 0.243 113.000 111.000 108.000 101.000 94.220 63.590 0.270 112.000 111.000 104.000 96.830 92.650 63.400 0.297 112.000 109.000 103.000 95.120 88.300 62.890 0.324 111.000 109.000 102.000 94.900 87.020 60.240 0.351 109.000 107.000 102.000 90.350 86.820 60.070 0.378 109.000 107.000 101.000 90.100 83.690 59.920 0.405 107.000 105.000 100.000 89.500 82.190 59.850 0.432 107.000 105.000 99.710 88.070 79.180 53.390 0.459 105.000 103.000 96.260 87.230 78.290 53.220 0.486 101.000 99.370 92.320 79.580 74.520 52.540 0.514 98.620 96.960 90.130 78.970 72.440 50.980 0.541 93.450 91.590 85.580 77.490 71.290 50.640 0.568 92.800 91.020 84.920 76.970 69.270 49.370 0.595 85.600 84.050 78.420 73.590 68.740 48.020 0.622 84.820 83.200 78.420 70.970 64.470 47.590 0.649 84.110 82.580 77.290 68.930 63.760 45.180 0.676 79.310 78.140 72.690 63.590 56.750 44.640 0.703 74.410 72.960 68.120 58.650 56.250 42.300 0.730 73.530 72.160 66.680 56.550 53.490 40.750 0.757 68.250 67.010 63.140 56.480 52.850 40.150 0.784 67.640 66.730 62.160 56.240 51.260 39.870 0.811 63.840 62.890 59.680 53.670 49.610 39.540 0.838 63.750 62.710 58.230 50.060 47.080 38.110 0.865 55.700 54.680 52.380 49.290 46.990 34.390 0.892 54.370 53.310 50.180 46.460 45.450 33.380 0.919 54.200 53.310 49.600 45.990 43.700 33.150 0.946 50.060 49.180 46.770 42.220 39.300 31.670 0.973 40.150 39.430 36.700 32.370 31.470 26.370 1/ 10 192.500 188.200 175.100 147.000 132.700 69.021 MEAN OF ANNUAL VALUES = 52.559 STANDARD DEVIATION OF ANNUAL VALUES = 14.081 UPPER 90% CONFIDENCE LIMIT ON MEAN = 56.034 EEC calculations:

FOR Tees and Greens Acute EEC = ( 1/ 10 peak value)( Percent area for Green & Tee) = ( 192.5 µ g/ L)( 0.04) = 7.70 µ g/ L Non cancer Chronic EEC =( 1/ 10 yearly value)( Percent area for Green & Tee) ( 69.02 µ g/ L)( 0.04) = 2.76 µ g/ L Cancer chronic EEC = ( Mean of annual value)( Percent area for Green & Tee) ( 52.56 µ g/ L)( 0.04) = 2.10 µ g/ L 7 FOR Fairways Acute EEC = ( 1/ 10 peak value)( Percent area for Fairway) = ( 192.5 µ g/ L)( 0.23) = 44.28 µ g/ L Non cancer Chronic EEC =( 1/ 10 yearly value)( Percent area for FAirways) ( 69.02 µ g/ L)( 0.23) = 15.87 µ g/ L Cancer chronic EEC = ( Mean of annual value)( Percent area for Fairways) ( 52.56 µ g/ L)( 0.23) = 12.08 µ g/ L FOR Roughs Acute EEC = ( 1/ 10 peak value)( Percent area for Roughs) = ( 192.5 µ g/ L)( 0.67) = 128.65 µ g/ L Non cancer Chronic EEC =( 1/ 10 yearly value)( Percent area for Rough) ( 69.02 µ g/ L)( 0.67) = 46.24 µ g/ L Cancer chronic EEC = ( Mean of annual value)( Percent area for Rough) ( 52.56 µ g/ L)( 0.67) = 35.22 µ g/ L


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 35491]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15271]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, June
23, 2011 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Paredes, as duty officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday,
June 23, 2011 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the
Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: June 15, 2011.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-15271 Filed 6-15-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 161 (Monday, August 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51435-51436]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18062]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket Nos. FDA-2021-N-1222; FDA-2015-N-3662; FDA-2013-N-1425; FDA-
2008-D-0530; FDA-2019-N-0482; FDA-2021-N-1192; FDA-2018-N-4042; FDA-
2015-N-3815; FDA-2019-N-0721; and FDA-2013-N-0013]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office
of Management and Budget Approvals

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing a list of
information collections that have been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JonnaLynn Capezzuto, Office of
Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-
12M, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a list of FDA information
collections recently approved by OMB under section 3507 of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507). The OMB control
number and expiration date of OMB approval for each information
collection are shown in table 1. Copies of the supporting statements
for the information collections are available on the internet at
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. An Agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

        Table 1--List of Information Collections Approved by OMB
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            OMB control    Date approval
           Title of collection                  No.           expires
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Food Labeling: Notification Procedures         0910-0331       7/31/2025
 for Statements on Dietary Supplements..
Guidance for Reagents for Detection of         0910-0584       7/31/2025
 Specific Novel Influenza A Viruses.....
Mitigation Strategies to Protect Food          0910-0812       7/31/2025
 Against Intentional Adulteration.......
Tropical Disease Priority Review               0910-0822       7/31/2025
 Vouchers...............................
Reporting Associated with New Animal           0910-0032       8/31/2025
 Drug Applications and Veterinary Master
 Files..................................
Substances Generally Recognized as Safe:       0910-0342       8/31/2025
 Notification Procedure.................
Establishing and Maintaining Lists of          0910-0509       8/31/2025
 U.S. Product Manufacturers/Processors
 With Interest in Exporting CFSAN-
 Regulated Products.....................
Electronic Submission of Medical Device        0910-0625       8/31/2025
 Registration and Listing...............
Accreditation of Third Party                   0910-0750       8/31/2025
 Certification Bodies to Conduct Food
 Safety Audits and Issue Certifications.
Sanitary Transportation of Human and           0910-0773       8/31/2025
 Animal Food............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: August 16, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-18062 Filed 8-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P