[Federal Register: November 29, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 229)]
[Notices]
[Page 69103-69104]
[DOCID:fr29no06-29]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-72-000]

CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company, Notice of Tariff
Filing

(November 21, 2006)
    Take notice that on November 17, 2006, CenterPoint Energy Gas
Transmission Company (CEGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on
Appendix A to be effective December 18, 2006.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-20196 Filed 11-28-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: June 6, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 108)]
[Notices]
[Page 31321-31322]
[DOCID:fr06jn07-86]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]

Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public Notice

May 30, 2007.
    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of
the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission
decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt off-
the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested
proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of
the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any
oral communication.
    Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional
file associated with, but not a part of, the decisional record of the
proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited
communication and any responses thereto should become a part of the
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication, and may
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant
such a request only when it determines that fairness so requires. Any
person identified below as having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable proceeding in accordance with
Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
    Exempt off-the-record communications are included in the decisional
record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
    The following is a list of off-the-record communications recently
received by the Secretary of the Commission. The communications listed
are grouped by docket numbers in ascending order. These filings are
available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or
may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using

the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number, excluding the last three
digits, in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,

contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

                                 Exempt
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Presenter or
        Docket number               Date received           requester
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. CP07-8-001................                  5-23-07  Dean Thiel.
2. ER07-744-000..............                  5-14-07  Hon. John E.
                                                         Baldacci.
3. ER07-744-000..............                  5-09-07  Michael H.
                                                         Michaud.

4. Project No. 2216-000......                  5-15-07  Hon. Hillary
                                                         Rodham Clinton.
5. Project No. 2216-000......                  5-25-07  Hon. Charles E.
                                                         Schumer.
6. Project 2576-083..........                  5-16-07  Hon. Richard
                                                         Blumenthal.
7. Project No. 12571-000.....                  5-17-07  Mary Jane Parks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-10813 Filed 6-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 15 (Thursday, January 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3819-3820]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01221]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-1064]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Application for
Participation in the Medical Device Fellowship Program

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by
February 24, 2014.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX:

202-395-7285, or emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>All comments
should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0551. Also
include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of this
document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville,
MD 20850<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.

Application for Participation in the Medical Device Fellowship
Program--(OMB Control Number 0910-0551)--(Extension)

    Sections 1104, 1302, 3301, 3304, 3320, 3361, 3393, and 3394 of
Title 5 of the United States Code authorize Federal Agencies to rate
applicants for Federal jobs. Collecting applications for the Medical
Device Fellowship Program will allow FDA's Center for Devices and
Radiological Health (CDRH) to easily and efficiently elicit and review
information from students and health care professionals who are
interested in becoming involved in CDRH activities. The process will
reduce the time and cost of submitting written documentation to the
Agency and lessen the likelihood of applications being misrouted within
the Agency mail system. It will assist the Agency in promoting and
protecting the public health by encouraging outside persons to share
their expertise with CDRH.
    In the Federal Register of September 10, 2013 (78 FR 55260), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. No comments were received.
    FDA based these estimates on the number of inquiries that have been
received concerning the program and the number of requests for
application forms over the past 3 years.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                                       Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of
                            FDA form No.                                Number of      responses per     Total annual   Average  burden    Total hours
                                                                       respondents       respondent       responses      per  response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application Form (Form FDA 3608)...................................             250                1              250                1              250
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    Dated: January 16, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-01221 Filed 1-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register: October 11, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 196)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 57896-57898]
[DOCID:fr11oc07-22]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2006-26490; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-75-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Alpha Aviation Design Limited (Type
Certificate No. A48EU Previously Held by APEX Aircraft and Avions
Pierre ROBIN) Model R2160 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation
authority of

another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    To prevent failure of the wing structure and assembly components
due to undetected fatigue and corrosion * * *

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 13,
2007.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov.
 Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
; or in person at the Docket Management Facility

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2006-
26490; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-75-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov
, including any personal information you provide. We

will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), which is the airworthiness
authority for New Zealand, has issued AD DCA/R2000/28, dated September
28, 2006 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    To prevent failure of the wing structure and assembly components
due to undetected fatigue and corrosion * * *

The MCAI requires that you inspect the wing structure and fuselage
attachment and repair any defects that you find.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Avions Pierre Robin (recent type certificate responsibility was
with APEX Aircraft and current responsibility with Alpha Aviation
Design Limited) has issued Service Bulletin No. 123, revision 2, dated
November 14, 1995; and Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 123, revision 3,
issued December 23, 1999.
    The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service
Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
described in a separate paragraph of the proposed AD. These
requirements, if ultimately adopted, will take precedence over the
actions copied from the MCAI.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 10 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take about 15 work-hours per
product to comply with basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about
$1,326 per product.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this proposed AD to
the U.S. operators to be $25,260 or $2,526 per product.
    We have no way to determine what aircraft will need replacement
parts that may be required based on the results of any inspection.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and

responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Alpha Aviation Design Limited (Type Certificate No. A48EU previously
held by Apex Aircraft and Avions Pierre Robin): Docket No. FAA-2006-
26490; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-75-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by November 13, 2007.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Model R2160 airplanes, serial numbers 001
through 378, certificated in any category.

Reason

    (d) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    To prevent failure of the wing structure and assembly components
due to undetected fatigue and corrosion * * *

The MCAI requires that you inspect the wing structure and fuselage
attachment and repair any defects that you find.

Actions and Compliance

    (e) Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) For airplanes with less than 4,000 hours time-in-service
(TIS): When the airplane reaches a total of 3,500 hours TIS or
within the next 100 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed
750 hours TIS, disassemble the wings from the fuselage and inspect
the wing structure and assembly components following instruction No.
1 in Robin Aviation Service Bulletin No. 123, revision 3, dated
December 23, 1999. If any defects are found, before further flight,
repair following Robin Aviation Service Bulletin No. 123, revision
3, dated December 23, 1999; and Avions Pierre Robin Service Bulletin
No. 123, revision 2, issued November 14, 1995.
    (2) For airplanes with 4,000 hours TIS or more that do not have
the special instruction in paragraph E of Avions Pierre Robin
Service Bulletin No. 123, revision 2, dated November 14, 1995,
incorporated: Within the next 100 hours TIS after the effective date
of this AD and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 750 hours TIS,
disassemble the wings from the fuselage and inspect the wing
structure and assembly components following instruction No. 1 in
Robin Aviation Service Bulletin No. 123, revision 3, dated December
23, 1999. If any defects are found, before further flight, repair
following Robin Aviation Service Bulletin No. 123, revision 3, dated
December 23, 1999; and Avions Pierre Robin Service Bulletin No. 123,
revision 2, issued November 14, 1995.
    (3) For airplanes with 4,000 hours TIS or more that have the
special instruction in paragraph E of Avions Pierre Robin Service
Bulletin No. 123, revision 2, dated November 14, 1995, incorporated:
Within the next 750 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD
and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 750 hours TIS, disassemble
the wings from the fuselage and inspect the wing structure and
assembly components following instruction No. 1 in Robin Aviation
Service Bulletin No. 123, revision 3, dated December 23, 1999. If
any defects are found, before further flight, repair following Robin
Aviation Service Bulletin No. 123, revision 3, dated December 23,
1999; and Avions Pierre Robin Service Bulletin No. 123, revision 2,
issued November 14, 1995.
    (4) For all airplanes: When the airplane reaches a total of
3,500 hours TIS after installation of the wing-to-fuselage bolts or
within the next 100 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, do a non-destructive inspection of the wing-
to-fuselage retaining bolts and replace any bolts that do not pass
this inspection following instruction No. 2 in Robin Aviation
Service Bulletin No. 123, revision 3, dated December 23, 1999.
    (5) For all airplanes: Within the next 50 hours TIS after re-
assembling the wing and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100
hours TIS, inspect the wing-to-fuselage retaining bolts for correct
torque settings following instruction No. 3 in Robin Aviation
Service Bulletin No. 123, revision 3, dated December 23, 1999. The
required torque value is 22 ft-lb with nut part number <IP_ADDRESS>.
Tighten to 16 ft-lb (pre-loading) and then torque from 16 to 22 ft-
lb.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No Differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (f) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (g) Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Authority AD DCA/R2000/28,
dated September 28, 2006; Avions Pierre Robin Service Bulletin No.
123, revision 2, issued November 14, 1995; and Robin Aviation
Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 123, revision 3, issued December 23,
1999, for related information.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on October 4, 2007.
David R. Showers,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E7-20047 Filed 10-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 105 (Monday, June 1, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 33150]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11687]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP20-871-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Update Filing--Removal of
Expired Agreements to be effective 6/14/2020.
    Filed Date: 5/15/20.
    Accession Number: 20200515-5000.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/28/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-882-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate--Manchester
Street K511085 to be effective 6/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 5/21/20.
    Accession Number: 20200521-5095.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/2/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-883-000.
    Applicants: White River Hub, LLC.
    Description: Annual Fuel Gas Reimbursement Percentage Report of
White River Hub, LLC under RP20-883.
    Filed Date: 5/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200522-5131.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/3/20.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered,
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 26, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-11687 Filed 5-29-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


DRAFT Page 1 of 2 3/ 15/ 2005 U. S. EPA BOARD OF SCIENTIFIC COUNSELORS Human Health Subcommittee DRAFT MEETING AGENDA Friday, April 8, 2005 3: 00 p. m.   5: 00 pm EST CONFERENCE CALL Participation by Teleconference Only 3: 00 3: 10 pm Welcome and Overview Dr. James Klaunig  Purpose of Teleconference Call Chair, HH Subcommittee Dr. Jim Clark Vice Chair, HH Subcommittee 3: 10 3: 25 pm Long Term Goal 1: Dr. Joseph Landolph Mechanistic Data in Risk Assessment LTG1 Lead  Draft response to the charge questions  Discussion 3: 25 3: 40 pm Long Term Goal 2: Dr. Michael Jayjock Aggregate/ Cumulative Risk LTG2 Lead  Draft response to the charge questions  Discussion 3: 40 3: 55 pm Long Term Goal 3: Dr. Timothy Buckley Susceptible Subpopulations LTG3 Lead  Draft response to the charge questions  Discussion 3: 55 4: 10 pm Long Term Goal 4: Dr. Elaine Symanski Evaluating Public Health Outcomes LTG4 Lead  Draft response to the charge questions  Discussion 4: 10 4: 20 pm Incorporation of Testimonials in Report Dr. Harvey Clewell Dr. Donald Mattison 4: 20 4: 40 pm Executive Summary Dr. James Klaunig  Draft response to the charge questions Dr. Jim Clark  Discussion DRAFT Page 2 of 2 3/ 15/ 2005 4: 40 4: 50 pm Draft Final Report Subcommittee  Identification of Additional Changes  Approval 4: 50 5: 00 pm Public Comment 5: 00 pm Adjourn