ther other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other wall dry Fabric Filter + Wet Scrubber other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other Page 616 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other Page 617 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other wall dry Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other tangential dry Cold side ESP + SCR wall dry Cold side ESP Page 618 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 wall dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Hot side ESP tangential dry Hot side ESP tangential dry Hot side ESP tangential dry Cyclone tangential dry Cyclone other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other tangential dry Hot side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other other other other other other other other other other other other other wall dry Cold side ESP + SCR wall dry Cold side ESP + SCR tangential dry tangential dry other other other other other other other Page 619 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 other other other other other other other other other other wall dry wall dry wall dry other other other other other other other wall dry other other other other other tangential dry Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber tangential dry Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber tangential dry Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber tangential dry Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber other other other other other other tangential dry Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber tangential dry Cold side ESP other other other other other other other other other other other other wall dry Cold side ESP + SCR + Wet Scrubber wall dry Cold side ESP + SCR + Wet Scrubber other other Page 620 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other wall dry Fabric Filter other other other other cyclone wet Fabric Filter + Dry Scrubber tangential dry Fabric Filter + Dry Scrubber tangential dry Fabric Filter + Dry Scrubber wall dry Fabric Filter wall dry Fabric Filter + Dry Scrubber tangential dry Cold side ESP other other other other other other other other wall dry Cold side ESP wall dry Cold side ESP wall dry Cold side ESP other other cyclone wet Cold side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP wall dry Cold side ESP wall dry Cold side ESP wall dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP Page 621 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP wall dry other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other other other other other other other other other other other other tangential dry Fabric Filter + Wet Scrubber other other other other other other other other other other other other cyclone wet Cold side ESP + Fuel Reburning other other other other Page 622 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 other other other other other other other other other cyclone wet Cold side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP + SCR other other other other cyclone wet Cold side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP other other other other other other other cyclone wet Cold side ESP tangential dry Hot side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other other other other cyclone wet Cold side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP tangential dry Hot side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other other other other other other other other tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP Page 623 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 tangential dry Cold side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP wall dry tangential dry tangential dry other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other tangential dry tangential dry tangential dry tangential dry tangential dry tangential dry Hot side ESP tangential dry tangential dry wall dry Hot side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other other other other other other other other tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other tangential dry Page 624 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 tangential dry tangential dry tangential dry Hot side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other other other other other other other other other other other other other other dry other dry other dry other dry other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other Page 625 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other Page 626 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other wall dry wall dry other other cyclone wet Hot side ESP + Wet Scrubber cyclone wet Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber tangential wet Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber cyclone wet Hot side ESP cyclone wet Hot side ESP other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other other Page 627 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 other unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown other other cyclone wet Hot side ESP cyclone wet Hot side ESP cyclone wet Hot side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber tangential dry Fabric Filter cyclone wet Cold side ESP wall wet Cold side ESP + SCR wall wet Cold side ESP + SCR wall wet Cold side ESP + SCR wall wet Cold side ESP + SCR wall wet Cold side ESP + SCR wall wet Hot side ESP unknown unknown vertical dry Cold side ESP vertical dry Cold side ESP vertical dry Cold side ESP cyclone wet Cold side ESP other other tangential tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential other other other other other other tangential wet tangential wet tangential wet Cold side ESP tangential dry Hot side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown Page 628 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 unknown unknown unknown other tangential dry Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber tangential dry Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber tangential dry Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber tangential dry Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber other other other cyclone wet Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber cyclone wet Cold side ESP + Wet Scrubber other wall dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP tangential dry Cold side ESP other other other cyclone wet Cold side ESP cyclone wet cyclone wet cyclone wet other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other other other SCR PC unknown Cold side ESP + SCR + Wet Scrubber other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR Page 629 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 other other SCR PC unknown Cold side ESP + SCR + Wet Scrubber other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR PC unknown Cold side ESP + SCR + Wet Scrubber other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR Page 630 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR PC unknown Cold side ESP + SCR + Wet Scrubber other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR Page 631 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 other other SCR other other SCR + Wet Scrubber PC unknown Cold side ESP + SCR + Wet Scrubber other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR other other SCR Page 632 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 ExistingNOxControl SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 633 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR Low NOx Burner Page 634 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 635 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 636 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 637 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR SNCR Page 638 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR Overfire Air Page 639 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Advanced Overfire Air Page 640 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Advanced Overfire Air Low Excess Air Overfire Air Page 641 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Page 642 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 643 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Overfire Air Page 644 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 645 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 646 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 647 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Page 648 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Page 649 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 650 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Page 651 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 652 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 653 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Overfire Air Low NOx Burner SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 654 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Other Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 655 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Low NOx Burner Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Low NOx Burner Not Applicable Fluidized Bed Combustor Fluidized Bed Combustor Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner Page 656 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 657 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Low NOx Burner SCR Page 658 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 659 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning SCR Overfire Air Overfire Air Page 660 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Overfire Air Overfire Air SNCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SNCR SNCR SNCR SNCR Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low Excess Air SNCR Low NOx Burner Page 661 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Not Applicable Low NOx Burner Technology with Close coupled and Separated OFA ( Tangentially fired units only)

Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 662 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR Page 663 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Page 664 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Page 665 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Other Other Other Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 666 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Page 667 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 668 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 669 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 670 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 671 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 672 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 673 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Other Page 674 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 675 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 676 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 677 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 678 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Page 679 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 680 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Page 681 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Overfire Air Page 682 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 683 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SNCR SNCR SNCR SNCR SNCR SNCR Page 684 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SCR Other SCR Page 685 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 686 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Overfire Air Overfire Air Biased Firing ( alternate burners) Biased Firing ( alternate burners)

Flue Gas Recirculation Biased Firing ( alternate burners) Biased Firing ( alternate burners)

Page 687 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Other Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 688 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Biased Firing ( alternate burners) Biased Firing ( alternate burners) Biased Firing ( alternate burners) Biased Firing ( alternate burners)

Fuel Reburning Low Excess Air Page 689 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Fuel Reburning SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 690 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Overfire Air Low NOx Burner SNCR SNCR SNCR SNCR SNCR Low NOx Burner SNCR Page 691 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR Fuel Reburning Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Flue Gas Recirculation SCR Low NOx Burner SCR Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 692 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Flue Gas Recirculation Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 693 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Overfire Air SCR SCR SCR SNCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SNCR Low NOx Burner Page 694 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR Low NOx Burner Other Overfire Air Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 695 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SNCR Low NOx Burner SNCR SNCR Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Page 696 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Page 697 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Flue Gas Recirculation Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 698 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low Excess Air Overfire Air Page 699 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Other Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation SCR SCR Page 700 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning SNCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner SNCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 701 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 702 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SNCR SNCR SNCR SNCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SNCR Overfire Air Page 703 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR SNCR SNCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR Page 704 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SNCR SNCR SCR SNCR SNCR SNCR SCR SCR Page 705 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SNCR SNCR Page 706 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Other Low NOx Burner Other Other Other Other Page 707 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Other Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Page 708 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Other Other Low NOx Burner Overfire Air SCR Overfire Air Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Page 709 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation SCR Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Other Other Other Flue Gas Recirculation Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Advanced Overfire Air Advanced Overfire Air Low Excess Air Page 710 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Overfire Air Fuel Reburning Biased Firing ( alternate burners) Biased Firing ( alternate burners)

Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Overfire Air Overfire Air Fuel Reburning Flue Gas Recirculation SCR SCR Page 711 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Fuel Reburning Flue Gas Recirculation Low NOx Burner Flue Gas Recirculation Page 712 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR SNCR SCR SCR Flue Gas Recirculation Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 713 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Page 714 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Page 715 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Flue Gas Recirculation Low NOx Burner Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Fuel Reburning Page 716 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR SCR SCR SCR SNCR SNCR SCR SCR Overfire Air SNCR SNCR Page 717 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SNCR SCR SCR SCR Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR Page 718 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation SCR SCR Page 719 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR SNCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Flue Gas Recirculation Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Fuel Reburning Low NOx Burner Page 720 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Page 721 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR Page 722 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Other Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Page 723 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Flue Gas Recirculation Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Page 724 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 725 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR Page 726 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR Page 727 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Page 728 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 729 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 730 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR Page 731 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SNCR Page 732 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 733 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 734 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Fluidized Bed Combustor SCR SCR Page 735 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Page 736 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Page 737 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 738 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR SCR Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Page 739 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 740 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR SCR SCR Page 741 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SNCR SNCR SCR Page 742 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR Page 743 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Page 744 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 745 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 746 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 747 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 748 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 749 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low Excess Air Low Excess Air SNCR Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner SCR Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner SNCR SNCR Overfire Air SNCR SNCR Page 750 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 751 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Other Other Page 752 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Other SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Low NOx Burner SCR Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Page 753 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Other Low NOx Burner SCR Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Page 754 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low Excess Air Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Other Other Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 755 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Low Excess Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 756 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Page 757 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 758 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR SCR SCR SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 759 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Other Page 760 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Page 761 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Page 762 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Fuel Reburning Low NOx Burner SCR Overfire Air Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner SCR Page 763 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Biased Firing ( alternate burners)

SCR SCR SCR SCR Fluidized Bed Combustor Fluidized Bed Combustor Page 764 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Low NOx Burner Page 765 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SNCR SNCR Page 766 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 767 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Overfire Air SCR Page 768 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 769 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Page 770 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR Page 771 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR SCR Page 772 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 773 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Page 774 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Page 775 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner SCR Page 776 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low Excess Air Flue Gas Recirculation Flue Gas Recirculation Overfire Air Overfire Air SCR SCR Page 777 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Overfire Air Overfire Air SCR SCR Page 778 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 779 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Fuel Reburning Page 780 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 SCR Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Page 781 MACT Proposal 2003 parsed 2010 Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Low NOx Burner Biased Firing ( alternate burners) Biased Firing ( alternate burners)


[Federal Register: September 11, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 175)]
[Notices]
[Page 46755-46756]
[DOCID:fr11se09-31]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13566-000]

McGinnis, Inc.; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application Accepted
for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing
Applications

September 3, 2009.
    On August 6, 2009, McGinnis, Inc. filed an application, pursuant to
section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study the
feasibility of the Melvin Price Hydrokinetic Project, to be located on
the Mississippi River, in St. Claire County, Missouri and Madison
County, Illinois.
    The proposed Melvin Price Project would be located up to 12,000
feet downstream of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Melvin Price Lock
and Dam. The proposed project would consist of: (1) Ten turbine
generators, with a total installed capacity of 350 kilowatts, mounted
to a single barge attached to the riverbed; (2) an armored submarine
cable to transmit power generated to a metering station and transformer
on shore adjacent to the barge; (3) a new approximately one- to two-
mile-long, 13.2 kilovolt transmission line, which would extend from the
new metering station to interconnect with the grid at either an
existing hydropower facility substation located at Price Dam or a
nearby existing Wood River Station; and (4) appurtenant facilities. The
Melvin Price Hydrokinetic Project would have an estimated average
annual generation of 1,533 megawatts-hours, which would be distributed
to the power grid or sold directly to industrial, commercial, or
municipal users.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Bruce McGinnis, Sr., McGinnis, Inc., P.O.
Box 534, 502 Second St. Ext., South Point, Ohio 45680,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    FERC Contact: John Ramer,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically,
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-
comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the Commission's Web site at http:/
/www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13566) in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-21870 Filed 9-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44423-44424]
[FR Doc No: 2023-14667]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-97844; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2022-079]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Designation of a Longer Period on Proceedings To Determine
Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1, To Amend Rules 4702(b)(14) and (b)(15) Concerning
Dynamic M-ELO Holding Periods

July 6, 2023.
    On December 21, 2022, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to replace the static holding period requirements
for Midpoint Extended Life Orders and Midpoint Extended Life Orders
Plus Continuous Book with dynamic holding periods. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on January 10,
2023.\3\ On February 22, 2023, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\4\ the Commission designated a longer period within which to
approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change,
or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the
proposed rule change.\5\ On March 9, 2023, the Exchange filed Amendment
No.1 to the proposed rule change, which amended and superseded the
proposed rule change as originally filed. On April 7, 2023, the
Commission provided notice of filing of Amendment No. 1 and instituted
proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1.\6\ The Commission received
comments on the proposed rule change.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92844 (January 4,
2023), 88 FR 1438.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 96963, 88 FR 12710
(February 28, 2023).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97263, 88 FR 22498
(April 13, 2023).
    \7\ All comments received by the Commission on the proposed rule
change are available on the Commission's website at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nasdaq-2022-079/srnasdaq2022079.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \8\ provides that, after initiating
proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving or
disapproving the proposed

rule change not later than 180 days after the date of publication of
notice of filing of the proposed rule change. The Commission may extend
the period for issuing an order approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change, however, by not more than 60 days if the Commission
determines that a longer period is appropriate and publishes the
reasons for such determination. The proposed rule change was published
for notice and comment in the Federal Register on January 10, 2023.\9\
July 9, 2023, is 180 days from that date, and September 7, 2023, is 240
days from that date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \9\ See Notice, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, so that it has sufficient
time to consider the proposed rule change, the issues raised in the
comment letters that have been submitted in connection therewith, and
the Exchange's response to comments. Accordingly, the Commission,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\10\ designates September 7,
2023, as the date by which the Commission should either approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1
(File No. SR-NASDAQ-2022-079).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-14667 Filed 7-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Call to Diana Graham to Discuss PPO

10/5/06

Attendees

Diana Graham, Keller and Heckman, LLP on behalf of ABERCO, Inc.

Chuck Peck, Versar, Inc.

Andrea Carone, EPA/SRRD

Eric Olson, EPA/SRRD

Jeff Dawson, EPA/HED

Matt Crowley, EPA/HED

Meeting Notes

On Thursday October 5, 2006 EPA joined by Chuck Peck spoke with Diana
Graham concerning the following questions Ms. Graham had regarding
information in the PPO RED: 1) How is the no-stack scenario relevant to
a railcar, truck, or ship where the fumigant vents through a smaller
opening compared to the surface area used in the calculation?  Is there
a way the model can be run to reflect a smaller surface area for
ventilation?  2)  What are the temperature limitations of the PERFUM
model? The 99% scrubber efficiency required by facilities was also
discussed.


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 34025]
[FR Doc No: E9-16703]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-D-0312]

Guidance for Institutional Review Boards, Frequently Asked
Questions--Institutional Review Board Registration; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance entitled ``Guidance for Institutional Review
Boards (IRBs), Frequently Asked Questions -- IRB Registration.'' This
guidance is intended to assist IRBs in complying with the new
requirement for IRB registration. This new rule requires each IRB in
the United States that reviews FDA-regulated research to register using
an Internet-based registration system that is maintained by the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). This registration system
is a modification of the one currently used by the Office for Human
Research Protections (OHRP) for registration of IRBs that are
designated by institutions under Federalwide Assurances (FWAs). OHRP
has issued a similar rule requiring IRBs designated by institutions
under FWAs to register or update their registration information using
this modified system.

DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on agency guidances at any
time.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on this guidance to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to http://www.regulations.gov. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for electronic access to the guidance document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Toth-Allen, Office of Science and
Health Coordination/Good Clinical Practice Program (HF-34), Food and
Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-
1585.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance document for IRBs
entitled, ``Guidance for Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Frequently
Asked Questions -- IRB Registration.'' This guidance is intended to
assist IRBs in complying with the new requirement for IRB registration
under amended 21 CFR 56.106, which is effective July 14, 2009.
Registration will be accomplished through a modified version of the
Internet-based registration system used by OHRP for registration of
IRBs that are designated by institutions under FWAs. This guidance
document addresses basic information, such as why FDA issued the new
rule, which IRBs are subject to the new regulation, the type of
information to be provided when registering, and implications of non-
compliance.
    This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). This guidance is being issued as
a level 1 guidance for immediate implementation in accordance with 21
CFR 10.115(g). Prior public participation is not feasible and FDA
believes the guidance is necessary to help IRBs better understand their
responsibilities under the new registration rule, which will go into
effect on July 14, 2009.

II. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This guidance refers to a previously approved collection of
information required by the FDA new final rule on registration
requirements. This collection of information is subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collection of information in 21
CFR 56.106(b) has been approved under 0990-0279.

III. Comments

    Interested persons may submit written or electronic comments
regarding this document to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES). Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper
copies of any mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one
paper copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be
seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.

IV. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either http://www.fda.gov/oc/gcp/draft.html or http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/default.htm

    Dated: July 9, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E9-16703 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<META name="generator" content="PDFCreactiveX HTML Export">
<META name="creation-date" content="05/12/2008 01:57:38 ">
<TITLE></TITLE>


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 26, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 70496]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28256]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 558

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0002]

Withdrawal of Approval of New Animal Drug Applications; Arsanilic
Acid

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal
drug regulations to reflect the withdrawal of approval of a new animal
drug application (NADA) for an arsanilic acid Type A medicated article
at the sponsor's request because the product is no longer manufactured
or marketed.

DATES: Withdrawal of approval is effective December 6, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Bartkowiak, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV-212), Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Fleming Laboratories, Inc., P.O. Box 34384,
Charlotte, NC 28234 has requested that FDA withdraw approval of NADA
008-019 for PRO-GEN (arsanilic acid) Type A medicated article because
the product, used to manufacture Type B and Type C medicated feeds, is
no longer manufactured or marketed.
    Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA gave notice
that approval of NADA 008-019, and all supplements and amendments
thereto, is withdrawn, effective December 6, 2013. As provided in the
regulatory text of this document, the animal drug regulations are
amended to reflect these voluntary withdrawals of approval.
    This rule does not meet the definition of ``rule'' in 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(A) because it is a rule of ``particular applicability.''
Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements
in 5 U.S.C. 801-808.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 558

    Animal drugs, Animal feeds.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and
redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 558 is
amended as follows:

PART 558--NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR USE IN ANIMAL FEEDS

0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 558 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b, 371.

Sec.  558.62  [Amended]

0
2. In Sec.  558.62, remove and reserve paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2),
(c)(1)(i), and (c)(1)(ii); and in paragraphs (c)(1)(iii), (c)(1)(iv),
(c)(1)(v), (c)(1)(vi), and (c)(1)(vii), in the ``Arsanilic acid in
grams per ton'' column, add ``90''.

    Dated: November 20, 2013.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2013-28256 Filed 11-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 26, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66167-66172]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27713]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-8501; Product Identifier 2014-SW-042-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM); reopening
of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier proposal for Sikorsky Aircraft
Corporation (Sikorsky) Model S-92A helicopters. This action revises the
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) by increasing the estimated costs
of compliance and removing the daily inspection requirements. We are
proposing this airworthiness directive (AD) to address the unsafe
condition on these products. Since these actions would impose an
additional economic burden over that proposed in the NPRM, we are
reopening the comment period to allow the public the chance to comment
on this change.

DATES: The comment period for the NPRM published in the Federal
Register on July 15, 2016 (81 FR 46002), is reopened.
    We must receive comments on this SNPRM by February 11, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this SNPRM, contact Sikorsky
Aircraft Corporation, Customer Service Engineering, 124 Quarry Road,
Trumbull, CT 06611; telephone 1-800-Winged-S or<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>You may view this service
information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest
Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
8501; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this SNPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristopher Greer, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Boston ACO Branch, Compliance and Airworthiness Division,
1200 District Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803; telephone (781)
238-7799; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-8501;
Product Identifier 2014-SW-042-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this SNPRM. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this SNPRM because
of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this SNPRM.

Discussion

    We issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that
would apply to Sikorsky Model S-92A helicopters with certain part-
numbered frame assemblies installed. The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on July 15, 2016 (81 FR 46002). The NPRM was prompted by
fatigue analysis indicating the possible development of stress
concentrations at the steel doublers on the main transmission airframe
support structure top deck, as well as the discovery of a helicopter
with a crack in the STA 362 frame and skin. The NPRM proposed to
require inspecting the main transmission forward and aft frame
assemblies and adjacent skins for a crack and loose fasteners and
replacing or repairing any cracked part or loose fastener. The NPRM
also proposed to require establishing life limits for certain frame
assemblies. The proposed requirements were intended to detect a crack
in a frame assembly and prevent failure of a frame and subsequent loss
of control of the helicopter.

Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued

    Since we issued the NPRM, we have revised the number of work-hours
to replace the aircraft frames based upon the comments we received.
This resulted in an overall increase in the cost of complying with the
proposed AD. Since the economic burden is higher than that in the NPRM,
we are reopening the comment period to allow the public the chance to
comment on this new estimate.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to comment on the NPRM. After
our NPRM was published, we received the following comments from
Sikorsky.

Request To Require Modification of the Frame Assembly

    Sikorsky requested that the AD require altering the transmission
support frames in accordance with Sikorsky S-92 Alert Service Bulletin
92-53-012, Basic Issue, dated February 10, 2014 (ASB 92-53-012), and
Sikorsky Special Service Instructions No. 92-074-E, Revision E, dated
April 9, 2014 (SSI 92-074-E). In support of its request, Sikorsky
stated this modification largely improves the fatigue capability of the
transmission support frames. Sikorsky also requested updating language
in the preamble to reflect requiring the modification.
    We disagree. We determined that the alterations to the transmission
support frames are not required to correct the unsafe condition.

Request To Remove the Daily Inspection

    Sikorsky requested that we remove the daily repetitive inspection
requirement from the proposed AD. In support of this request, Sikorsky
stated that the proposed AD's requirement to perform this same
inspection every 150 hours time-in-service (TIS) would maintain the
safety of the aircraft. Sikorsky further stated structural analysis
reports substantiate the 150-hour inspection interval.
    We agree that the daily inspection requirement is not necessary to
maintain the fleet's airworthiness. After reviewing data from
Sikorsky's organization designation authorization supporting its life
limit and continuing airworthiness projects, we determined that
repeating the inspections every 150 hours would be adequate to detect
and prevent an unsafe condition.

Request That the AD Reference the Maintenance Manual

    Sikorsky requested that the proposed AD reference the main
transmission support structure inspection task in the Sikorsky
maintenance manual for the 150-hour repetitive inspection. In support
of this request, Sikorsky stated this task provides a complete,
detailed procedure for the inspection requirements.
    We agree. We have revised the proposed AD to reference the task
card as guidance for the 150-hour inspection.

Request To Delay Issuance of the Proposed AD

    Sikorsky requested that we delay issuing this proposed AD until
after Sikorsky completes a project to increase the life limits of the
forward STA 382 and aft STA 362 frame assemblies.
    We disagree. Because this unsafe condition could exist or develop
on Sikorsky Model S-92A helicopters, the proposed actions are necessary
to ensure safety of the U.S. fleet. Issuance of an AD is the
appropriate method to correct the unsafe condition. Should completion
of Sikorsky's certification project result in a corrective action that
removes the unsafe condition, we might consider further rulemaking
action.

Request To Correct Part Numbers

    Sikorsky requested that we correct two part numbers in Table 4 of
the Required Actions. Specifically, Sikorsky

stated part number ``92070-02108-042'' should be ``92209-02108-042''
and part number ``92080-02108-103'' should be ``92209-02108-103.''
    We agree. We have revised the table accordingly.

Request To Add Serial Numbers to the Applicability

    Sikorsky requested that the proposed life limits only apply to
helicopters with serial numbers 920006 through 920243. In support of
this request, Sikorsky advised that starting with serial number 920244,
helicopters were manufactured with an upgraded titanium frame
configuration that is not affected by the proposed AD.
    We disagree. While production helicopters starting with serial
number 920244 may not currently have the parts that are subject to the
unsafe condition installed, operators are not required to maintain that
configuration. Omitting the serial numbers allows the proposed AD to
apply to any Model S-92A helicopter if a frame subject to the unsafe
condition is later installed.

Request To Clarify Language Regarding Life Limit of Altered Parts

    Sikorsky requested that we clarify the wording of the 28,500-hour
life limit for parts that are altered and changed to a new part number.
Specifically, Sikorsky requested that we change ``28,500 hours TIS
total (regardless of P/N)'' to ``28,500 hours TIS total from the
original frame part number initial service date.''
    We disagree. The language in the proposed AD clearly states that
this life limit applies regardless of whether the frame assembly part
number changes.

Request To Revise the Compliance Cost

    Sikorsky requested that we revise the estimated costs of complying
with the proposed AD. Specifically, Sikorsky advised that the number of
hours to replace a frame has increased from 3,360 to 5,000, while the
number of affected helicopters on the U.S. registry has decreased from
80 to 50.
    We agree. We have revised the Costs of Compliance section
accordingly.

Request To Revise Summary

    Sikorsky requested that we change the last sentence in SUMMARY,
which identifies the unsafe condition, to be consistent with the
language in the Unsafe Condition paragraph.
    We agree that Sikorsky's proposal provides more consistency.
However, due to Administrative Committee of the Federal Register
publishing requirements, the specific unsafe condition is no longer
stated in SUMMARY. Thus, no change to this SNPRM is necessary.

Request To Update Contact Information

    Sikorsky requested that we update the email address for its
Customer Service Engineering in both the preamble and the proposed AD.
    We agree and have made the requested changes.

Request To Clarify the Related Service Information Section

    Sikorsky requested that we revise the language in the Related
Service Information section describing the actions in ASB 92-53-012 and
SSI 92-074-E. Specifically, Sikorsky requests that we change
``replacing the fasteners'' to ``removing steel doublers, cold-working
holes, oversizing holes, trimming skin panels and reassembly with
interference fit fasteners.'' In support, Sikorsky stated the
recommended language would provide clarification.
    We agree. We have made the requested changes accordingly.

Request To Clarify the Differences Section

    Sikorsky requested that we clarify the Differences Between This
Proposed AD and the Service Information section. Specifically, Sikorsky
recommended adding ``by this AD'' to the sentence: ``Contacting
Sikorsky would not be required.''
    We agree. We have revised the proposed AD accordingly.

Related Service Information

    Sikorsky issued S-92 Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) 92-53-008, Basic
Issue, dated June 13, 2012 (ASB 92-53-008); S-92 ASB 92-53-009, Basic
Issue, dated December 6, 2012 (ASB 92-53-009); and ASB 92-53-012. ASB
92-53-008 provides procedures for a one-time inspection of the main
transmission frames and beams for a crack, missing or loose fastener or
collar, damage, deformation, and corrosion. ASB 92-53-009 specifies an
inspection before the first flight of the day and a recurring 150-hour
inspection of the interior and exterior surfaces of the upper flanges
and beams. ASB 92-53-012 specifies altering the forward and aft
transmission support frames by removing steel doublers, cold-working
the holes, oversizing the holes, trimming skin panels and reassembling
the parts with interference fit fasteners in accordance with SSI 92-
074-E. After this alteration, the parts are re-identified with a new
part number. Sikorsky refers to this alteration as a service life
extension program modification.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type
designs. Certain changes described above expand the scope of the NPRM.
As a result, we have determined that it is necessary to reopen the
comment period to provide additional opportunity for the public to
comment on this SNPRM.

Proposed Requirements of This SNPRM

    This SNPRM would establish a life limit for certain part-numbered
frame assemblies by removing from service any part that has reached or
exceeded its new life limit. Frame assemblies that are altered under
Sikorsky's service life extension program and re-identified with a new
part number must be removed from service upon accumulating the life
limit of the old part-number or within certain hours TIS since the
alteration, whichever occurs first.
    This SNPRM also would require, within 150 hours TIS and thereafter
at intervals not to exceed 150 hours TIS, inspecting STA 328 frame and
STA 362 frame for a crack or loose fasteners. If there is a crack or
loose fastener, this SNPRM would require repairing or replacing any
cracked part and any loose fastener before further flight.

Differences Between This SNPRM and the Service Information

    The service information requires providing certain information to
Sikorsky, and this proposed AD would not. The service information
specifies performing a fluorescent penetrant inspection if there is a
suspected crack and contacting Sikorsky if there is a crack, while this
proposed AD would only require repairing or replacing any cracked part.
Contacting Sikorsky would not be required by this proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 50 helicopters of
U.S. Registry. We estimate that operators may incur the following costs
to comply with this proposed AD. Labor costs are estimated at $85 per
work-hour. We estimate a minimal cost to establish and revise the life
limit of the frame assembly. We estimate it would take 1 work-hour to
inspect STA 328 and 362 frames. No parts would be needed for a total
cost of $4,250 for the fleet for each inspection per inspection cycle.
If a fastener is replaced, we estimate the cost to be minimal. If a
frame is replaced, it would take 5,000 work-

hours and required parts would cost $296,000 for a total cost of
$721,000 per helicopter.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs''
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Helicopters: Docket No. FAA-2016-8501;
Product Identifier 2014-SW-042-AD.

(a) Applicability

    This AD applies to Model S-92A helicopters, certificated in any
category, with a forward station (STA) 328 or aft STA 362 frame
assembly with a part number (P/N) as shown in Table 1 to paragraph
(e)(1), Table 2 to paragraph (e)(1), Table 3 to paragraph (e)(2), or
Table 4 to paragraph (e)(2) of this AD.

(b) Unsafe Condition

    This AD defines the unsafe condition as a crack in a main
transmission airframe support structure. This condition could result
in failure of a main transmission frame and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter.

(c) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by February 11, 2019.

(d) Compliance

    You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.

(e) Required Actions

    (1) For helicopters with a frame assembly with a P/N shown in
Table 1 to paragraph (e)(1) or Table 2 to paragraph (e)(1) of this
AD, before further flight, remove from service any part that has
reached or exceeded its new life limit. Forward STA 328 frame
assemblies that are altered and changed to P/N 92070-20124-064,
92070-20124-067, 92070-20127-045, 92070-20124-065, 92070-20124-047,
or 92070-20127-046 must be removed from service upon accumulating
12,000 hours TIS from the alteration or 28,500 hours TIS total
(regardless of P/N) from the total original frame part number
initial service date, whichever occurs first.

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26DE18.011

    (2) For each frame assembly listed in Table 1 to paragraph
(e)(1) or Table 4 to paragraph (e)(2) of this AD with 1,801 or more
hours TIS, and for each frame assembly listed in Table 2 to
paragraph (e)(1) or Table 3 to paragraph (e)(2) of this AD with
1,301 or more hours TIS, within 150 hours TIS and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 150 hours TIS, do the following inspections.
For guidance on performing these inspections, refer to Sikorsky S-
92A-AMM-000 Maintenance Manual Chapter 53-20-00, Task 53-20-00-210-
003, dated January 31, 2018:
    (i) Inspect the STA 328 frame and STA 362 frame between the left
and right butt line (BL) 16.5 beams and inspect the area on the left
and right BL 16.5 beams six inches on either side of the mounting
pads for a crack and loose fasteners. If there is a loose fastener
or a crack, repair or replace any cracked part and any loose
fastener before further flight.
    (ii) Inspect the STA 328 and STA 362 outboard frames, left and
right sides, from the BL 16.5 beam to water line 252.25 for a crack
and loose fasteners. If there is a loose fastener or a crack, repair
or replace any cracked part and any loose fastener before further
flight.

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26DE18.012

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26DE18.013

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Boston ACO Branch, FAA, may approve AMOCs for
this AD. Send your proposal to: Kristopher Greer, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Boston ACO Branch, Compliance and Airworthiness Division,
1200 District Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803; telephone
(781) 238-7799; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.

(g) Additional Information

    Sikorsky S-92 Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) 92-53-008, Basic
Issue, dated June 13, 2012; ASB 92-53-009, Basic Issue, dated
December 6, 2012; ASB 92-53-012, Basic Issue, dated February 10,
2014, and Sikorsky Special Service Instructions No. 92-074-E,
Revision E, dated April 9, 2014, and Sikorsky S-92A-AMM-000
Maintenance Manual, Chapter 53-20-00, Task 53-20-210-003, dated
January 31, 2018, which are not incorporated by reference, contain
additional information about the subject of this AD. For service
information identified in this AD, contact Sikorsky Aircraft
Corporation, Customer Service Engineering, 124 Quarry Road,
Trumbull, CT 06611; telephone 1-800-Winged-S or<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>You may view this information
at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

(h) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code: 5311 Fuselage Main,
Frame.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on December 13, 2018.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-27713 Filed 12-21-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 27, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40184-40186]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15918]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 27, 2021 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2021-0414]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; M/V ZHEN HUA 24, Crane Delivery Operation,
Chesapeake Bay and Patapsco River, Baltimore, MD

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a temporary safety
zone for certain waters of the Chesapeake Bay and Patapsco River. This
action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these
navigable waters during the movement of the M/V ZHEN HUA 24 while it is
transporting four new Super-Post Panamax container cranes to the Port
of Baltimore, anticipated to arrive between August 26, 2021, and
September 15, 2021. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and
vessels from being in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region or a designated
representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 11, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2021-0414 using the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email MST3 Melissa Kelly, Sector Maryland-
NCR, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard: Telephone (410)
576-2596<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On June 28, 2021, Ports America Chesapeake, LLC notified the Coast
Guard that the M/V ZHEN HUA 24 will be transporting four new Super-Post
Panamax container cranes to the Port of Baltimore. The vessel transit
is taking place from Shanghai, China. The M/V ZHEN HUA 24 is
anticipated to arrive between August 26, 2021, and September 15, 2021.
The current estimated arrival date is September 5, 2021, but is subject
to change. These cranes will be delivered to, and installed at, the
Seagirt Marine Terminal at Baltimore, MD. Prior to transiting to
Baltimore, MD, the vessel will arrive in the Chesapeake Bay near
Annapolis, MD, to anchor and conduct appropriate cargo configuration
for transit.
    The cranes exceed the beam of the M/V ZHEN HUA 24 on the port side
by approximately 129 feet and on the starboard side by approximately
228 feet. The total beam for the vessel with the cranes aboard is
approximately 489 feet. The maximum height of the cranes aboard the
vessel is approximately 176 feet. This beam width and cargo height will
severely restrict the M/V ZHEN HUA 24's ability to maneuver and create
a hazard to navigation if required to meet or pass other large vessels
transiting the navigation channels. Because of the size of the cargo
and the width of the navigation channels, vessels will not be able to
transit around the M/V ZHEN HUA 24, necessitating closure of the
navigation channels Chesapeake Channel Lighted Buoy 90 (LLNR 7825) in
position 38[deg]58'18.53'' N, 076[deg]23'18.96'' W, and the Seagirt
Marine Terminal in position 39[deg]15'02.43'' N, 076[deg]32'20.50'' W,
Baltimore, MD. During the transit of the M/V ZHEN HUA 24 under the
William P. Lane, Jr. Memorial (US-50/301) Bridges across the Chesapeake
Bay and the Francis Scott Key (I-695) Bridge across the Patapsco River,
safety concerns will be heightened due to the small margin of error for
safe passage. The vessel transit in this area is anticipated to occur
during daylight hours only, and in wind conditions of 25 knots or less.
Hazards associated with the movement of a large freight vessel with an
oversized cargo severely restricted in its ability to maneuver while
transiting confined shipping channels include injury or loss of life
and damage to property and the environment resulting from collisions
with other vessels. The COTP Maryland-National Capital Region has
determined that potential hazards associated with the crane delivery
operation would be a safety concern for any vessel required to transit
the navigation channels in the Chesapeake Bay and the Patapsco River
that would meet, pass, or overtake the M/V ZHEN HUA 24.
    The Coast Guard is requesting that interested parties provide
comments within a shortened comment period of 15 days instead of the
typical 30 days for this notice of proposed rulemaking. The Coast Guard
believes the 15-day comment period still provides for a reasonable
amount of time for interested parties to review the proposal and
provide informed comments on it while also ensuring that the Coast
Guard has time to review and respond to any significant comments and
has a final rule in effect in time for the scheduled event.
    The Coast Guard is proposing this rulemaking under authority in 46
U.S.C. 70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231).

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP is proposing to establish a safety zone during the inbound
transit of the M/V ZHEN HUA 24. The M/V ZHEN HUA 24 is currently
anticpated to arrive at Baltimore sometime between August 26, 2021, and
September 15, 2021. The current estimated arrival date is September 5,
2021, but is subject to change. Inbound transit is expected to last
approximately 7 hours.
    The safety zone would cover all navigable waters of the Chesapeake
Bay and Patapsco River within 500 feet of the M/V ZHEN HUA 24 while it
is transiting between Chesapeake Channel Lighted Buoy 90 (LLNR 7825) in
position 38[deg]58'18.53'' N, 076[deg]23'18.96'' W, and the Seagirt
Marine Terminal in position 39[deg]15'02.43'' N, 076[deg]32'20.50'' W,
Baltimore, MD. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the
safety of

vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after the
scheduled crane delivery operation. No vessel or person would be
permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated representative.
    The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this
document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size and
duration of the safety zone, which would impact only vessel traffic
required to transit certain navigation channels of the Chesapeake Bay
and the Patapsco River for a total no more than 7 enforcement-hours.
Although these waterways support both commercial and recreational
vessel traffic, the downriver portions of the waterway would be
reopened as the M/V ZHEN HUA 24 transits northward in the Chesapeake
Bay and up the Patapsco River. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the
zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this proposed rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rulemaking has implications for federalism under Executive Order
13132 (Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under
that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the
fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described
in Executive Order 13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
rulemaking elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone lasting 7 enforcement hours that would prohibit entry within
certain navigable waters of the Chesapeake Bay and Patapsco River.
Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual
023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you

submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation.
    Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2021-0414 in the
``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Next, look for this document in
the Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
    Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. We review all comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may
choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that
we receive.
    Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records
notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T05-0414 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T05-0414   Safety Zone; M/V ZHEN HUA 24, Crane Delivery
Operation, Chesapeake Bay and Patapsco River, Baltimore, MD.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the Chesapeake Bay and Patapsco River, within 500 feet of the M/V ZHEN
HUA 24 while it is transiting between Chesapeake Channel Lighted Buoy
90 (LLNR 7825) in position 38[deg]58'18.53'' N, 076[deg]23'18.96'' W,
and the Seagirt Marine Terminal in position 39[deg]15'02.43'' N,
076[deg]32'20.50'' W, Baltimore, MD. These coordinates are based on WGS
84.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section--
    Captain of the Port (COTP) means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
    Designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Maryland-National
Capital Region (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or on Marine Band Radio
VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Those in the safety zone must comply
with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
    (d) Enforcement officials. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in
the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and
local agencies.
    (e) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced during
inbound transit of the M/V ZHEN HUA 24 to the Port of Baltimore.

    Dated: July 20, 2021.
David E. O'Connell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Maryland-NCR.
[FR Doc. 2021-15918 Filed 7-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: August 11, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 153)]
[Notices]
[Page 40279-40280]
[DOCID:fr11au09-142]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60430; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2009-072]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Clarify Fee Schedule for Members Using the NASDAQ Market Center

August 4, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\

notice is hereby given that on July 24, 2009, The NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC (``NASDAQ'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by NASDAQ. Pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(1)
thereunder,\4\ NASDAQ has designated this proposal as constituting a
stated policy, practice, or interpretation with respect to the meaning,
administration, or enforcement of an existing rule, which renders the
proposed rule change effective upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NASDAQ proposes to streamline and clarify the fee schedule for
members using the NASDAQ Market Center. No fee charged or credit
offered is being modified. The text of the proposed rule change is
attached as Exhibit 5 [sic] and also is available at http://
nasdaqomx.cchwallstreet.com/, at NASDAQ's principal office, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NASDAQ included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. NASDAQ has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    NASDAQ is making clerical changes to NASDAQ Rule 7018 to streamline
and simplify its fee schedule. First, NASDAQ is moving all references
to securities priced under $1 to a new subsection 7018(b) and
renumbering the remaining subsections (c) through (j). Second, NASDAQ
is combining Rule 7018(a)(2) and (a)(3), both of which govern trading
of securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange, into a single
paragraph and re-numbering current paragraph 7018(a)(4). Third, NASDAQ
is eliminating multiple instances of redundant or superfluous text.
None of the clerical changes will modify any fee assessed or credit
earned for trading on the NASDAQ Market Center.
2. Statutory Basis
    NASDAQ believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\5\ in general, and with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among
members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system
which NASDAQ operates or controls. NASDAQ is making clerical changes to
enhance the clarity of its fee schedule without impacting any of the
fees charged or credits offered to members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    NASDAQ does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \7\ and subparagraph (f)(1) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\8\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(ii).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2009-072 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2009-072. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official
business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2009-072, and should be submitted on or before
September 1, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19141 Filed 8-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 61658]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19236]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-98262; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2023-019]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a
Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the Valkyrie Bitcoin
Fund Under Nasdaq Rule 5711(d), Commodity-Based Trust Shares

August 31, 2023.
    On July 3, 2023, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the Valkyrie Bitcoin
Fund under Nasdaq Rule 5711(d), Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on July 21, 2023.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97922 (July 17,
2023), 88 FR 47214. Comments on the proposed rule change are
available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nasdaq-2023-019/srnasdaq2023019.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is September 4, 2023. The Commission is extending this 45-day time
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that it has
sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change and the issues
raised therein. Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to section
19(b)(2) of the Act,\5\ designates October 19, 2023, as the date by
which the Commission shall either approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule
change (File No. SR-NASDAQ-2023-019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-19236 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 30983]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13118]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: US Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.
Extension:
    Rule 102; SEC File No. 270-409; OMB Control No. 3235-0467.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the
existing collection of information provided for in the following rule:
Rule 102 of Regulation M (17 CFR 242.102).
    Rule 102 prohibits distribution participants, issuers, and selling
security holders from purchasing activities at specified times during a
distribution of securities. Persons otherwise covered by these rules
may seek to use several applicable exceptions such as an exclusion for
actively traded reference securities and the maintenance of policies
regarding information barriers between their affiliates.
    There are approximately 895 respondents per year that require an
aggregate total of 1,795 hours to comply with this rule. Each
respondent makes an estimated 1 annual response. Each response takes on
average approximately 2.006 hours to complete. Thus, the total
compliance burden per year is 1,795 burden hours. The total compliance
cost for the respondents is approximately $102,261.15, resulting in a
cost of compliance for the respondent per response of approximately
$114.26 (i.e., $102,261.15/895 responses). These are internal labor
costs and there are no other costs.
    The Commission may not conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a
collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a
valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.
    Background documentation for this information collection may be
viewed at the following link, http://www.reginfo.gov. Comments should
be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503 or by sending an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>; and (ii) Thomas Bayer, Director/Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon,
6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days
of this notice.

    May 22, 2011.
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-13118 Filed 5-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P