[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6329-6330]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02301]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA-2015-0069]

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes
Mellitus

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of final disposition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA confirms its decision to exempt 41 individuals from its
rule prohibiting persons with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM)
from operating commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce.
The exemptions enable these individuals to operate CMVs in interstate
commerce.

DATES: The exemptions were effective on November 17, 2015. The
exemptions expire on November 17, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical
Programs Division,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-113,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Electronic Access

    You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at: http://www.regulations.gov.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov and/or Room W12-140 on the
ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
    Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.

II. Background

    On October 15, 2015, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of Federal
diabetes exemption applications from 41 individuals and requested
comments from the public (80 FR 632155). The public comment period
closed on November 16, 2015, and no comments were received.
    FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of the 41 applicants and
determined that granting the exemptions to these individuals would
achieve a level of safety equivalent to or greater than the level that
would be achieved by complying with the current regulation 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3).

Diabetes Mellitus and Driving Experience of the Applicants

    The Agency established the current requirement for diabetes in 1970
because several risk studies indicated that drivers with diabetes had a
higher rate of crash involvement than the general population. The
diabetes rule provides that ``A person is physically qualified to drive
a commercial motor vehicle if that person has no established medical
history or clinical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus currently requiring
insulin for control'' (49 CFR 391.41(b)(3)).
    FMCSA established its diabetes exemption program, based on the
Agency's July 2000 study entitled ``A Report to Congress on the
Feasibility of a Program to Qualify Individuals with Insulin-Treated
Diabetes Mellitus to Operate in Interstate Commerce as Directed by the
Transportation Act for the 21st Century.'' The report concluded

that a safe and practicable protocol to allow some drivers with ITDM to
operate CMVs is feasible. The September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441), Federal
Register notice in conjunction with the November 8, 2005 (70 FR 67777),
Federal Register notice provides the current protocol for allowing such
drivers to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
    These 41 applicants have had ITDM over a range of 1 to 39 years.
These applicants report no severe hypoglycemic reactions resulting in
loss of consciousness or seizure, requiring the assistance of another
person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred
without warning symptoms, in the past 12 months and no recurrent (2 or
more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the past 5 years. In each case,
an endocrinologist verified that the driver has demonstrated a
willingness to properly monitor and manage his/her diabetes mellitus,
received education related to diabetes management, and is on a stable
insulin regimen. These drivers report no other disqualifying
conditions, including diabetes-related complications. Each meets the
vision requirement at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10).
    The qualifications and medical condition of each applicant were
stated and discussed in detail in the October 15, 2015, Federal
Register notice and they will not be repeated in this notice.

III. Discussion of Comments

    FMCSA received no comments in this proceeding.

IV. Basis for Exemption Determination

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) if the exemption
is likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than
would be achieved without the exemption. The exemption allows the
applicants to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
    To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered medical reports about the applicants' ITDM and vision, and
reviewed the treating endocrinologists' medical opinion related to the
ability of the driver to safely operate a CMV while using insulin.
    Consequently, FMCSA finds that in each case exempting these
applicants from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) is
likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the
exemption.

V. Conditions and Requirements

    The terms and conditions of the exemption will be provided to the
applicants in the exemption document and they include the following:
(1) That each individual submit a quarterly monitoring checklist
completed by the treating endocrinologist as well as an annual
checklist with a comprehensive medical evaluation; (2) that each
individual reports within 2 business days of occurrence, all episodes
of severe hypoglycemia, significant complications, or inability to
manage diabetes; also, any involvement in an accident or any other
adverse event in a CMV or personal vehicle, whether or not it is
related to an episode of hypoglycemia; (3) that each individual provide
a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's report to the medical
examiner at the time of the annual medical examination; and (4) that
each individual provide a copy of the annual medical certification to
the employer for retention in the driver's qualification file, or keep
a copy in his/her driver's qualification file if he/she is self-
employed. The driver must also have a copy of the certification when
driving, for presentation to a duly authorized Federal, State, or local
enforcement official.

VI. Conclusion

    Based upon its evaluation of the 41 exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts the following drivers from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10), subject to the requirements cited above 949 CFR
391.64(b)):

David V. Bartel (MN)
Derwin M. Beckles (NJ)
John H. Bell Jr. (FL)
Robert G. Chadwick (UT)
Brian D. Correll (PA)
Stephen V. Danczak (OH)
Thomas W. Freeley (NY)
Jeffrey S. Gurcik (NJ)
Robert Hackney, Jr. (NJ)
Lawrence D. Hastings (WI)
Michael P. Haun (RI)
Anthony G. Hill (GA)
Charles H. Hillman (OR)
Alan L. Hodge (MN)
Hans G. Horschig (NM)
Nicholas C. Huber (IA)
Joseph S. Hurlburt (NY)
Robert J. Johnson (WA)
Christopher E. Jones (NY)
Roger L. Killion (NC)
Robert L. Lawson (SC)
Leroy Madison (SC)
Mark L. Martin (WA)
Wendell J. Matthews (MO)
Peter G. Mattos (VT)
Randy G. Moody (TN)
Michael J. Murray, Jr. (CA)
Joseph K. Neisen (IL)
Manuel Pereira (CT)
Herman Powell, Jr. (TX)
William H. Riley, Jr. (IL)
James W. Smith (SC)
Thomas H. Smith (WI)
Michael J. Swanson (IL)
Patrick J. Sweeney (NJ)
Richard T. Tabeling (KY)
David Tellez (MT)
Mark A. Turley (PA)
Kristi L. Turner (TX)
Jon T. Webster (MN)
Owen E. Whetzel (WV)

    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 each exemption is
valid for two years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will
be revoked if the following occurs: (1) The person fails to comply with
the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was
granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent
with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315. If the
exemption is still effective at the end of the 2-year period, the
person may apply to FMCSA for a renewal under procedures in effect at
that time.

    Issued on: January 19, 2016.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-02301 Filed 2-4-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 238 (Thursday, December 10, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 79500]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27163]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3547-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]

Louisiana; Emergency and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of an
emergency for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-3547-EM), dated October 7,
2020, and related determinations.

DATES: The declaration was issued October 7, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated October 7, 2020, the President issued an emergency declaration
under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the emergency conditions in the State of
Louisiana resulting from Hurricane Delta beginning on October 6,
2020, and continuing, are of sufficient severity and magnitude to
warrant an emergency declaration under the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.
(``the Stafford Act''). Therefore, I declare that such an emergency
exists in the State of Louisiana.
    You are authorized to provide appropriate assistance for
required emergency measures, authorized under title V of the
Stafford Act, to save lives and to protect property and public
health and safety, and to lessen or avert the threat of a
catastrophe in the designated areas. Specifically, you are
authorized to provide Public Assistance Category B emergency
protective measures, including direct Federal assistance in selected
areas and Public Assistance Category B emergency protective
measures, limited to direct Federal assistance in the other
designated areas.
    Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance be
supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Public Assistance will be limited to 75 percent of the total
eligible costs. In order to provide Federal assistance, you are
hereby authorized to allocate from funds available for these
purposes such amounts as you find necessary for Federal emergency
assistance and administrative expenses.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, John E. Long, of FEMA is appointed
to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared emergency.
    The following areas of the State of Louisiana have been designated
as adversely affected by this declared emergency:

    Public Assistance Category B emergency protective measures,
including direct federal assistance for the parishes of Acadia,
Allen, Ascension, Assumption, Avoyelles, Beauregard, Calcasieu,
Cameron, Catahoula, Concordia, East Baton Rouge, East Feliciana,
Evangeline, Iberia, Iberville, Jefferson, Jefferson Davis,
Livingston, Lafayette, Lafourche, Orleans, Ouachita, Plaquemines,
Pointe Coupee, Rapides, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. Helena, St.
James, St. John the Baptist, St. Landry, St. Martin, St. Mary, St.
Tammany, Tangipahoa, Tensas, Terrebonne, Vermilion, Washington, West
Baton Rouge, and West Feliciana.
    Public Assistance Category B emergency protective measures,
limited to direct federal assistance for the parishes of Bienville,
Bossier, Caddo, Caldwell, Claiborne, De Soto, East Carroll,
Franklin, Grant, Jackson, La Salle, Lincoln, Madison, Morehouse,
Natchitoches, Red River, Richland, Sabine, Union, Vernon, Webster,
West Carroll, and Winn.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-27163 Filed 12-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: July 7, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 130)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 38328-38330]
[DOCID:fr07jy08-6]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2007-0183; FRL-8575-3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Illinois; Revisions to Emission Reduction Market System

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In 1997, Illinois adopted and submitted rules establishing a
cap and trade program regulating emissions of volatile organic
compounds (VOC). The program, known as the Emission Reduction Market
System (ERMS), was designed to address VOC sources in the Chicago area
with potential to emit at least 25 tons per year. Then, in 2004, the
Chicago ozone nonattainment area was in effect reclassified from severe
to moderate, which according to EPA guidance revised the applicable
definition of major sources from 25 tons per year to 100 tons per year.
This ``reclassification'' could have resulted in the program no longer
including sources with potential to emit more than 25 but less than 100
tons per year. Instead, Illinois adopted rule revisions, submitted to
EPA on January 10, 2007, which required that these sources remain part
of the program. Illinois' rule revisions also addressed other potential
ramifications of the ``reclassification.'' EPA is approving these rule
revisions.

DATES: This final rule is effective August 6, 2008.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2007-0183. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation
Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This
facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone John
Summerhays, Environmental Scientist, at<PHONE_NUMBER> before visiting
the Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Summerhays, Environmental
Scientist, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This supplementary information section is
arranged as follows:

I. Description and Review of Illinois' Submittal
II. What Action Is EPA Taking?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Description and Review of Illinois' Submittal

    On January 10, 2007, Illinois submitted revisions to Part 205 of
Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code, entitled ``Emissions
Reduction Market System'' (ERMS). ERMS is a cap and trade program
addressing VOC emissions in the Chicago area. Under ERMS, Illinois
issues allowances equivalent to 12 percent less than baseline VOC
emission levels, and requires affected sources to hold allowances
equivalent to their VOC emissions during the ozone season. The program
thereby requires overall VOC emission levels to be reduced to 12
percent below baseline levels. Illinois adopted the original rules for
this program on November 20, 1997, and submitted the rules to EPA on
December 16, 1997. EPA approved those rules on October 15, 2001, at 66
FR 52359.
    Part 205 requires participation of all major VOC sources in the
Chicago area. More specifically, the version of Section 205.200 that
Illinois adopted in 1997 stated that ``The requirements of this Part
shall apply to any source * * * located in the Chicago ozone
nonattainment area that is required to obtain a [Title V permit], and
[has VOC emissions during the ozone season of at least 10 tons].'' The
requirement for a Title V operating permit applies to major sources.
Since the Chicago area at that time was classified as a severe ozone
nonattainment area, major sources were defined to include sources with
the potential to emit 25 tons per year or more of VOC.
    In 2004, EPA classified the Chicago ozone nonattainment area as
moderate for the 8-hour ozone standard, and effective in 2005 rescinded
the severe classification for the 1-hour ozone standard. The definition
of major sources for moderate ozone nonattainment areas includes
sources with the potential to emit 100 tons per year or more of VOC.
According to EPA guidance (see 69 FR 23951, April 30, 2004), the
replacement of the prior classification of severe with a classification
of moderate thus meant that sources with potential to emit at least 25
tons per year but less that 100 tons per year of VOC would no longer be
major sources and would no longer be required to have Title V operating
permits. As a result, the sources in the Chicago area in this size
range would no longer be subject to the ERMS requirements, given the
applicability criteria in section 205.200 as quoted above.
    Illinois estimated that the loss of these intermediate sized
sources from ERMS would result in a loss of 330 tons of VOC emission
reduction per ozone season associated with these sources. Illinois
sought to avoid this loss of sources from the program. Consequently,
Illinois revised section 205.200 to redefine applicability to include
sources with potential to emit at least 25 tons of VOC (and sources
otherwise required to have a Title V permit) and at least 10 tons of
VOC emissions during the ozone season. By this means, Illinois revised
its applicability provisions to include the same set of sources as were
included in 1997, notwithstanding the change in the classification of
the Chicago ozone nonattainment area.
    Under the 1997 rules, since by definition all the affected sources
had a Title V permit, Illinois used the Title V permits to establish
several elements of the ERMS program. Most notably, Illinois used the
source's Title V permit to specify the number of allowances to be
issued to the source (Cf. section 205.315) and the source-specific VOC
monitoring methods (Cf. section 205.330).
    Since (under EPA's guidance) sources with potential emissions
between 25 and 100 tons per year were no longer subject to a
requirement for a Title V permit, the State needed an alternative means
of specifying source-specific ERMS provisions. Illinois therefore
adopted section 205.316, to provide that sources included in ERMS but
not required to obtain a Title V permit were required either to request
a Title V permit anyway or to apply for a federally enforceable state
operating

permit (FESOP). The FESOP is to specify the provisions (relating for
example to the number of allowances allocated to the source and the
source-specific monitoring requirements) that would otherwise be
specified in the Title V permit.
    Title V of the Clean Air Act provides for defining some operations
with trivial or no emissions as insignificant activities. The 1997
version of section 205.220 of Illinois' rules exempts these activities
from ERMS, based on the exemption under Title V. Illinois intended that
these activities continue to be exempt from ERMS, irrespective of
whether a source is subject to the requirement for a Title V permit.
Therefore, Illinois revised Section 205.220 to provide that any
activity meeting the criteria in Part 201 Subpart F of Title 35 of the
Illinois Administrative Code for insignificant activities may be
exempted from the ERMS program, whether the source is subject to a
Title V permit or a FESOP.
    In ozone nonattainment areas classified as severe, major new
sources and existing sources undergoing major modifications must obtain
1.3 tons of offsets for every ton of new emissions. In ozone
nonattainment areas classified as moderate, major new sources and
existing sources undergoing major modifications need only obtain 1.1
tons of offsets for every ton of new emissions. New source review rules
require that any change in offset ratio applies only prospectively, to
sources permitted after the change in ratio, and that a source
permitted before the change in ratio must continue to have offsets in
at least the ratio that applied at the time the source was permitted.
    Under section 205.150 of the 1997 ERMS rules, major new sources and
sources undergoing major modifications were required to obtain 1.3
allowances for every ton of new emissions. Illinois' revised rules
provide for modified ratios as the applicable ratios change. Section
205.150(f)(1) of the revised rules states: ``If the nonattainment
classification of the Chicago area for ozone is changed such that the
required offset ratio is no longer 1.3 to 1 and a new offset ratio
applies, as specified in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 203.302, that ratio shall
then apply in lieu of the 1.3 to 1 ratio set forth in subsections
(c)(2), (d)(1), and (e) of this Section. Such new ratio shall not apply
to any part of a source or any modification already subject to the 1.3
to 1 ratio or other previously effective offset ratio established prior
to the effective date of the new ratio.'' Section 205.150(f)(2)
provides that the ratio becomes 1 to 1 if the Chicago area is
redesignated to attainment.
    These revisions address the ramifications of a revised
classification according to EPA guidance as cited above. However, while
Illinois was adopting these rule revisions, EPA's ozone implementation
guidance was being challenged in court. On December 22, 2006, with
clarification on June 8, 2007, the Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit ruled against elements of EPA's ozone implementation
guidance, including the ``backsliding'' inherent in allowing an area
originally classified as severe and subsequently classified as moderate
to apply the less stringent major source definition for moderate areas.
South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. v. EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (D.C.
Cir. 2006).
    This court ruling has no effect on the approvability of Illinois'
ERMS rule revisions. Illinois' revised ERMS rules assure the
incorporation of all sources with potential to emit at least 25 tons of
VOC per year (and at least 10 tons of VOC during the ozone season),
irrespective of whether the major source definition for permitting
purposes is 25 or 100 tons per year. Thus, Illinois' rules assure
inclusion of a fixed set of sources, irrespective of the source size
used in the definition of major sources. Illinois' revised ERMS rules
also assure that any new source or major modification must obtain
allowances such that the ratio of allowances to the quantity of new
emissions matches the offset ratio that applies under the permitting
requirements that are in effect at the time the new source or major
modification is permitted.
    Illinois requested that EPA defer rulemaking on section 205.150(e).
This section provides that new sources providing offsets by holding
trading program allowances in the proper ratio need not also provide
offsets in their new source permit. Illinois made a similar request for
deferral of EPA rulemaking on this section in conjunction with its 1997
submittal of ERMS rules. While a new source may use a shutdown for both
purposes, purchasing the necessary allowances from a shutdown source
and simultaneously using the shutdown in the new source permit to
satisfy offset requirements, the deferral of rulemaking provides that
the two requirements must be met independently.
    Illinois made a corollary change, changing the term ``Chicago ozone
nonattainment area'' to the term ``Chicago area.'' The term ``Chicago
area'' is defined to mean the same area as the previous term ``Chicago
ozone nonattainment area,'' but the revised term more clearly signifies
that the program will remain in effect even if the Chicago area is
redesignated as an attainment area.
    In addition to the rules identified above, Illinois made conforming
revisions to multiple other rules. These revisions generally replace
the term ``Chicago nonattainment area'' with the term ``Chicago area''
or mention FESOPs as a possible vehicle for specifying source-specific
provisions to implement the ERMS rules.
    EPA finds these changes approvable. The change in the applicability
provisions merely assures that the original program applicability
criteria continue to apply, notwithstanding any change in the
classification or designation of the area. The requirement for sources
with potential emissions between 25 and 100 tons per year to obtain a
permit (either a Title V permit or a FESOP) is a reasonable means of
implementing the ERMS requirements at any time when these sources are
not required to obtain a Title V permit. Illinois' provision for offset
ratios, wherein new source emissions are offset at the ratio that
reflects the offset ratio that is mandated at the time the permit
authorizing the new source emissions is issued, properly matches offset
requirements. The use of the term ``Chicago area'' also properly
clarifies that the program continues even if the area is redesignated
to attainment.
    EPA proposed to approve these rule revisions on January 30, 2008,
at 73 FR 5471. On the same day, at 73 FR 5435, EPA also published a
direct final rule approving these rule revisions. However, EPA then
realized that the notice of direct final rulemaking, in comments on an
EPA memorandum discussing the above court ruling, unintentionally
commented on a national issue regarding ramifications of the court
ruling. Therefore, EPA withdrew its direct final rule on February 29,
2008, at 73 FR 11042. Since the comments did not affect the underlying
rationale for the proposed rule, i.e. because EPA proposed to find
Illinois' revised ERMS rules to retain the same benefits without regard
for what size is used to define major sources, EPA retained its
proposed rule. EPA received no comments on this proposed rule. EPA
continues to believe that Illinois' revised rules should be approved.

II. What Action Is EPA Taking?

    EPA is approving Illinois' revisions to the ERMS program, except
that EPA is deferring action on section 205.150(e).
    Illinois did not change every rule in Part 205. The State submitted
only those rules that it changed. Thus, the revised rules being
approved here must be

viewed in conjunction with the unrevised rules approved at 40 CFR
52.720(c)(158).

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 5, 2008. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: May 23, 2008.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, part 52, chapter I, of title 40
of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart O--Illinois

0
2. Section 52.720 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(180) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.720  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (180) On January 10, 2007, Illinois submitted revisions to its
rules for the Emission Reduction Market System. These revisions assure
that sources in the Chicago area with potential emissions of VOC
between 25 and 100 tons per year will remain subject to the program,
irrespective of changes in the area's ozone nonattainment
classification or designation and any associated changes in whether
such sources are defined to be major sources. EPA is again deferring
action on section 205.150(e).
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental
Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control
Board, Subchapter b: Alternative Reduction Program, Part 205 Emissions
Reduction Market System, Sections:

205.120 Abbreviations and Acronyms
205.130 Definitions
205.150 Emissions Management Periods (except for 205.150(e))
205.200 Participating Source
205.205 Exempt Source
205.210 New Participating Source
205.220 Insignificant Emission Units
205.300 Seasonal Emissions Component of the Annual Emissions Report
205.310 ERMS Applications
205.315 CAAPP Permits for ERMS Sources
205.316 Federally Enforceable State Operating Permits for ERMS
Sources
205.318 Certification for Exempt CAAPP Sources
205.320 Baseline Emissions
205.330 Emissions Determination Methods
205.335 Sampling, Testing, Monitoring and Recordkeeping Practices
205.337 Changes in Emissions Determination Methods and Sampling,
Testing, Monitoring and Recordkeeping Practices
205.400 Seasonal Emissions Allotment
205.405 Exclusions From Further Reductions
205.410 Participating Source Shutdowns
205.500 Emissions Reduction Generator
205.510 Inter-Sector Transaction
205.610 Application for Transaction Account
205.700 Compliance Accounting
205.730 Excursion Reporting
205.750 Emergency Conditions
205.760 Market System Review Procedures

[FR Doc. E8-15153 Filed 7-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 46 (Thursday, March 9, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14488-14490]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04804]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 31475; Amdt. No. 4050]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule amends, suspends, or removes Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports. These
regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or revised
criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National Airspace
System, such as the commissioning of new navigational facilities,
adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements. These
changes are designed to provide for the safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective March 9, 2023. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of March 9, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:

For Examination

    1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Ops-M30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, West Bldg., Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
    2. The FAA Air Traffic Organization Service Area in which the
affected airport is located;
    3. The office of Aeronautical Information Services, 6500 South

MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
    For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
[email protected] or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

Availability

    All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available online free
of charge. Visit the National Flight Data Center online at nfdc.faa.gov
to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP
copies may be obtained from the FAA Air Traffic Organization Service
Area in which the affected airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Nichols, Flight Procedures
and Airspace Group, Flight Technologies and Procedures Division, Flight
Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration. Mailing Address:
FAA Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, Flight Procedures and Airspace
Group, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., STB Annex, Bldg. 26, Room 217,
Oklahoma City, OK 73099. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends 14 CFR part 97 by amending
the referenced SIAPs. The complete regulatory description of each SIAP
is listed on the appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the National
Flight Data Center (NFDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P-NOTAM), and is
incorporated by reference under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14
CFR 97.20. The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the
need for a special format make their verbatim publication in the
Federal Register expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use
the regulatory text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction
on charts printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the
advantages of incorporation by reference are realized and publication
of the complete description of each SIAP contained on FAA form
documents is unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR
sections, and specifies the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs with
their applicable effective dates. This amendment also identifies the
airport and its location, the procedure and the amendment number.

Availability and Summary of Material Incorporated by Reference

    The material incorporated by reference is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
    The material incorporated by reference describes SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs as identified in the amendatory language for Part 97
of this final rule.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP as amended in the
transmittal. For safety and timeliness of change considerations, this
amendment incorporates only specific changes contained for each SIAP
and Takeoff Minimums and ODP as modified by FDC permanent NOTAMs.
    The SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, as modified by FDC
permanent NOTAM, and contained in this amendment are based on criteria
contained in the U.S. Standard for Terminal Instrument Procedures
(TERPS). In developing these changes to SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and
ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied only to specific conditions
existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in this rule
have been previously issued by the FAA in a FDC NOTAM as an emergency
action of immediate flight safety relating directly to published
aeronautical charts.
    The circumstances that created the need for these SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP amendments require making them effective in less than
30 days.
    Because of the close and immediate relationship between these
SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find
that notice and public procedure under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are
impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where
applicable, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d), good cause exists for making these
SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air traffic control, Airports, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 17, 2023.
Thomas J. Nichols,
Manager, Aviation Safety, Flight Standards Service, Standards Section,
Flight Procedures & Airspace Group, Flight Technologies & Procedures
Division.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title CFR
part 97, is amended by amending Standard Instrument Approach Procedures
and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, effective at 0901 UTC on the dates
specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113,
40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:
    By amending: Sec.  97.23 VOR, VOR/DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or
TACAN; Sec.  97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; Sec.
97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; Sec.  97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
Sec.  97.31 RADAR SIAPs; Sec.  97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and Sec.  97.35 COPTER
SIAPs, Identified as follows:

* * * Effective Upon Publication

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      AIRAC date           State              City                 Airport          FDC No.      FDC date                      Subject
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23-Mar-23............  CT             Bridgeport..........  Bridgeport/Sikorsky.       2/4101       2/6/23  RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Amdt 1A.
23-Mar-23............  CT             Bridgeport..........  Bridgeport/Sikorsky.       2/4102       2/6/23  RNAV (GPS) RWY 6, Amdt 1A.
23-Mar-23............  CT             Bridgeport..........  Bridgeport/Sikorsky.       2/4103       2/6/23  ILS OR LOC RWY 6, Amdt 10A.
23-Mar-23............  CT             Bridgeport..........  Bridgeport/Sikorsky.       2/4106       2/6/23  RNAV (GPS) RWY 29, Amdt 2A.
23-Mar-23............  IA             Iowa City...........  Iowa City Muni......       2/9840      1/12/23  RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Amdt 1A.
23-Mar-23............  IA             Iowa City...........  Iowa City Muni......       2/9848      1/12/23  VOR-A, Orig-D.
23-Mar-23............  NE             Grant...............  Grant Muni..........       3/9556       2/6/23  NDB RWY 33, Amdt 3C.
23-Mar-23............  NE             Grant...............  Grant Muni..........       3/9557       2/6/23  VOR/DME RWY 15, Amdt 2B.
23-Mar-23............  NE             Grant...............  Grant Muni..........       3/9558       2/6/23  RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, Amdt 1A.
23-Mar-23............  NE             Grant...............  Grant Muni..........       3/9559       2/6/23  RNAV (GPS) RWY 15, Amdt 1A.
23-Mar-23............  NJ             Millville...........  Millville Muni......       3/9570       2/6/23  RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig-F.
23-Mar-23............  NJ             Millville...........  Millville Muni......       3/9571       2/6/23  ILS OR LOC RWY 10, Amdt 2F.
23-Mar-23............  NJ             Millville...........  Millville Muni......       3/9572       2/6/23  RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Orig-C.
23-Mar-23............  NJ             Millville...........  Millville Muni......       3/9573       2/6/23  RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Orig-G.
23-Mar-23............  NJ             Millville...........  Millville Muni......       3/9574       2/6/23  RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Orig-C.
23-Mar-23............  NJ             Millville...........  Millville Muni......       3/9575       2/6/23  VOR-A, Amdt 1C.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2023-04804 Filed 3-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: May 17, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 94)]
[Notices]
[Page 27549-27550]
[DOCID:fr17my10-51]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

April 20, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG10-33-000.
    Applicants: Meadow Lake Wind Farm III LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of exempt wholesale generator
status of Meadow Lake Wind Farm III LLC.
    Filed Date: 04/20/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100420-5110.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 11, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: EG10-34-000.
    Applicants: Meadow Lake Wind Farm IV LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of exempt wholesale generator
status of Meadow Lake Wind Farm IV LLC.
    Filed Date: 04/20/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100420-5111.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 11, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: EG10-35-000.
    Applicants: Blackstone Wind Farm II LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of exempt wholesale generator
status submitted for filing by Blackstone Wind Farm II LLC.
    Filed Date: 04/20/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100420-5115.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 11, 2010.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER04-170-011.
    Applicants: MxEnergy Electric Inc.
    Description: MxEnergy Electric Inc. submits revisions to its
market-based rate tariff reflecting its status as a Category 2 Seller
in the Southwest, Northeast and Northwest regions, effective 4/20/10.
    Filed Date: 04/19/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100420-0204.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-521-009.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: New York Independent System Operator, Inc. submits its
implementation plan in compliance with the April 2008 Order.
    Filed Date: 04/16/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100419-0212.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, May 07, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1273-001.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc., Kansas Gas and Electric Company
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc. et al. submits Sub. Original Sheet
132B through 132D et al. to Westar's Open Access Transmission Tariff.
    Filed Date: 04/19/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100419-0211.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1063-000.
    Applicants: Vermont Transco LLC.
    Description: Vermont Transco, LLC submits Substation Participation
Agreement, currently designated as Rate Schedule 7 etc. to be effective
5/1/10.
    Filed Date: 04/16/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100419-0205.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, May 07, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1064-000.
    Applicants: 511 Plaza Energy, LLC.
    Description: 511 Plaza Energy, LLC submits an application for
authorization to make wholesale sales of energy and capacity at
negotiated, market-based rates.
    Filed Date: 04/19/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100419-0208.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1065-000.
    Applicants: Southern Company Services, Inc.
    Description: Southern Companies submits the Interconnection
Agreement by and between Piedmont Green Power, LLC and Southern
Companies.
    Filed Date: 04/19/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100419-0210.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1066-000.
    Applicants: Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc., Wisconsin
Power and Light Company.
    Description: Wisconsin Power and Light Company submits Notice of
Cancellation of WPL's Rate Schedule FERC Electric Tariff, Volume 5 etc.
    Filed Date: 04/19/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100419-0209.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1067-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. submits an executed
Interconnection Agreement with Mid-Kansas Electric Company, LLC et al.
    Filed Date: 04/19/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100420-0206.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1068-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. submits an executed Service
Agreement for Network Integration Transmission Service with Westar
Energy etc.
    Filed Date: 04/19/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100420-0205.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1069-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. submits revisions to its
Open Access Transmission Tariff and requests an effective date of 6/19/
10.
    Filed Date: 04/19/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100420-0203.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 10, 2010.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following open access
transmission tariff filings:

    Docket Numbers: OA08-96-004.
    Applicants: Southern Company Services, Inc.
    Description: Annual Penalty Assessment and Distribution Report of
Southern Company Services, Inc.
    Filed Date: 04/19/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100419-5268.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: OA10-9-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Annual Compliance Report of the New York Independent
System Operator, Inc. Regarding Unreserved Use and Late Study
Penalties.
    Filed Date: 04/19/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100419-5270.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 10, 2010.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
reliability filings:

    Docket Numbers: RD10-10-000.
    Applicants: Transmission Relay Loadability Reliability.

    Description: Compliance Filing of NERC in Response to Paragraphs
297, 308, 310, 311, and 312 of Order No. 733 Revised Violation Risk
Factors and Violation Severity Levels for PRC-023-1 Transmission Relay
Loadability.
    Filed Date: 04/19/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100419-5214.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, May 19, 2010.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-11623 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P