[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58493-58495]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24266]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-RCRA-2011-0750, FRL-9468-9]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Requirements for Generators, Transporters, and Waste
Management Facilities Under the RCRA Hazardous Waste Manifest System

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that EPA is planning to
submit a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to renew
an existing approved Information Collection Request (ICR) concerning
the RCRA Hazardous Waste Manifest. This ICR is scheduled to expire on
February 29, 2012. Before submitting the ICR to OMB for review and
approval, EPA is

soliciting comments on specific aspects of the proposed information
collection as described below.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 21, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
RCRA-2011-0750, by one of the following methods:
    http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Mail: RCRA Docket (28221T), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    Hand Delivery: 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Room 3334, Washington,
DC 20460. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal
hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-
2011-0750. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov website is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Groce, Office of Solid Waste,
(mail code 5304P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

How can I access the docket and/or submit comments?

    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2011-0750, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the RCRA Docket in
the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from
8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for RCRA Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use http://www.regulations.gov to obtain a copy of the draft
collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once
in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified in this document.

What information is EPA particularly interested in?

    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA specifically
solicits comments and information to enable it to:
    (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    (ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden
of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
    (iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and
    (iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from
very small businesses (those that employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses affected by this collection.

What should I consider when I prepare my comments for EPA?

    You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
    1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific
examples.
    2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
    3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
    4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
    5. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.
    6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
    7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.

What information collection activity or ICR does this apply to?

    Affected entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
Business and other for-profit as well as Farms.
    Title: Requirements for Generators, Transporters, and Waste
Management Facilities Under the RCRA Hazardous Waste Manifest System.
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 0801.18, OMB Control No. 2050-0039.
    ICR status: This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on February
29, 2012. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal
Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed
either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate
means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if
applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as
amended, establishes a national program to assure that hazardous waste
management practices are conducted in a manner that is protective of
human health and the environment. EPA's authority to

require compliance with the manifest system stems primarily from RCRA
section 3002(a)(5). This section mandates a hazardous waste manifest
``system'' to assure that all hazardous waste generated is designated
for and arrives at the appropriate treatment, storage, and disposal
facility. An essential part of this manifest system is the Uniform
Hazardous Waste Manifest (Form 8700-22A). The manifest is a tracking
document that accompanies the waste from its generation site to its
final disposition. The manifest lists the wastes that are being shipped
and the final destination of the waste. The manifest system is a self-
enforcing mechanism that requires generators, transporters, and owner/
operators of treatment, storage, and disposal facilities to participate
in hazardous waste tracking. In addition the manifest provides
information to transporters and waste management facility workers on
the hazardous nature of the waste, identifies wastes so that they can
be managed appropriately in the event of an accident, spill, or leak,
and ensures that shipments of hazardous waste are managed properly and
delivered to their designated facilities.
    Burden Statement: The table below summarizes the public reporting
and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Reporting     Recordkeeping
                         Respondent type                              burden          burden       Total burden
                                                                      (hours)         (hours)         (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manifest printer restraints.....................................       1.72-2.42            1.25       2.97-3.67
Hazardous Waste Generators:
    Large Quantity Generators (LQGs)............................       0.04-1.84       1.45-1.55       1.49-3.39
    TSDFs acting as generators..................................       0.54-1.87       1.45-1.55       1.99-3.42
    Small Quantity Generators (SQGs)............................       0.04-1.20            1.45       1.49-2.65
Transporters....................................................       0.17-2.80            1.42       1.59-4.22
Designated TSDFs................................................       0.44-1.42       1.42-1.59       1.86-3.01
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements
which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond
to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
    The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
    Estimated total number of potential respondents: 190,628.
    Frequency of response: each shipment.
    Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:
10.
    Estimated total annual burden hours: 3,743,122 hours.
    Estimated total annual costs: $109,934,365, which includes
$106,862,075 annualized labor and $3,072,290 for capital or O&M costs.

What is the next step in the process for this ICR?

    EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. At that time, EPA will
issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. If you have any
questions about this ICR or the approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Dated: September 14, 2011.
Suzanne Rudzinski,
Director, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery.
 [FR Doc. 2011-24266 Filed 9-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: January 17, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 12)]
[Notices]
[Page 3304-3305]
[DOCID:fr17ja08-106]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57136; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2006-82]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Order Granting
Approval of Proposed Rule Changes Relating to Amendments to NYSE Arca
Equities Rules 2.16 and 4.5 Relating to Certain ETP Holder
Administrative Procedures

January 11, 2008.

I. Introduction

    On November 7, 2006, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or the
``Exchange''), through its wholly owned subsidiary NYSE Arca Equities,
Inc. (``NYSE Arca Equities'' or the ``Corporation''), filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposal to
amend its Rules 2.16 and 4.5 relating to certain ETP Holder
administrative procedures. The proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on July 18, 2007.\3\ The Commission
received no comments

regarding the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56057 (Jul. 12,
2007), 72 FR 39477.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    NYSE Arca Equities Rule 2.16 currently provides that all Equity
Trading Permit (``ETP'') Holders \4\ must file their formation
documents with the Corporation. The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 2.16 in order to provide that only those ETP Holders
for which the Exchange is the Designated Examining Authority must
submit such formation documents to the Corporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1.1(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NYSE Arca Equities Rule 4.5(b) currently requires ETP Holders that
carry or clear accounts for customers to file two manually signed
copies of Part II of SEC Form X-17A-5 with the Corporation on a
quarterly basis. The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule
4.5(b) to provide that such reports shall be filed electronically with
the Corporation, rather than manually, and that the ETP Holder shall
maintain original copies of such reports with manual signatures in
accordance with NYSE Arca Equities Rule 2.24.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ NYSE Arca Equities Rule 2.24 provides that each ETP Holder
must make, keep current and preserve such books and records as the
Exchange may prescribe and as may be prescribed by the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Exchange Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder (including any interpretation relating
thereto) as though such ETP Holders were brokers or dealers
registered with the SEC pursuant to Section 15 of the Exchange Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NYSE Arca Equities Rule 4.5(c) currently requires ETP Holders that
do not carry or clear accounts for customers to file two manually
signed copies of Part IIA of SEC Form X-17A-5 with the Corporation on a
quarterly basis. The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule
4.5(c) to provide that such reports shall be filed electronically with
the Corporation, rather than manually, and that the ETP Holder shall
maintain original copies of such reports with manual signatures in
accordance with NYSE Arca Equities Rule 2.24.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange proposes to amend paragraphs (b) and (c) of
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 4.5 to codify procedural changes that have been
implemented by the Exchange and to be consistent with guidance that has
been provided previously to ETP Holders.

III. Discussion

    After careful review and based on the Exchange's representations,
the Commission finds that the proposed rule changes are consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations applicable to
a national securities exchange.\7\ In particular, the Commission finds
that the proposed rule changes are consistent with Section 6(b)(5) \8\
which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national
securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities, and to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission notes
that it has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes it is reasonable and consistent with the
Act for the Exchange to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rules 2.16 and 4.5(b)
and (c) in order to simplify the administrative procedures that ETP
Holders must follow, given the fact that the Exchange believes that
such amendments will not compromise the Exchange's ability to regulate
its ETP Holders.

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\9\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEArca-2006-82), as
amended, be, and hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-737 Filed 1-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 7427]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02182]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL13-43-000]

Council of the City of New Orleans; Mississippi Public Service
Commission; Arkansas Public Service Commission; Notice of Petition for
Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on January 22, 2013, pursuant to section 207 of
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of
Practice and Procedure 18 CFR 385.207, the Council of the City of New
Orleans, the Mississippi Public Service Commission and the Arkansas
Public Service Commission (together, the Entergy Retail Regulators)
filed a petition for declaratory order requesting the Commission issue
a declaratory order determining whether the Entergy Operating
Companies' proposed avoided cost calculation methodology satisfies the
Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (Petition) and request
for exemption from filing fee. On January 23, 2013 the Entergy Retail
Regulators filed errata to the Petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 21, 2013.

    Dated: January 28, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-02182 Filed 1-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11728-11730]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04500]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0122; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-002-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900
series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports in which a
single, undetected, erroneous radio altimeter output caused the
autothrottle to enter landing flare retard mode prematurely on
approach. This proposed AD would require removing certain autothrottle
computers and installing a new or reworked autothrottle computer. We
are proposing this AD to prevent a single, undetected, erroneous radio
altimeter output from causing premature autothrottle landing flare
retard and subsequent loss of automatic speed control, which could
result in loss of control of the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 17, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0122; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marie Hogestad, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0122;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-002-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the

closing date and may amend this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We received reports in which a single, undetected, erroneous radio
altimeter output caused the autothrottle to enter landing flare retard
mode prematurely on approach. The autothrottle computer delivered on
Boeing Model 737NG airplanes listed in the applicability of this
proposed AD does not have an autothrottle radio altimeter comparator to
inhibit landing flare retard mode and, therefore, can enter landing
flare retard mode prematurely due to a single, undetected, erroneous
radio altimeter signal. This condition, if not corrected, could result
in a single, undetected, erroneous radio altimeter output, causing
premature autothrottle landing flare retard and subsequent loss of
automatic speed control, which could result in loss of control of the
airplane.

Relevant Service Information

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-22A1215, dated
November 22, 2013. For information on the procedures, see this service
information at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for Docket No.
FAA-2014-0122.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require removing certain autothrottle
computers and installing a new or reworked autothrottle computer as
specified in the service information described previously.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 497 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
               Action                        Labor cost           Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Autothrottle computer replacement...  1 work-hour x $85 per                $0              $85          $42,245
                                       hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. Amend Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2014-0122; Directorate Identifier
2014-NM-002-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by April 17, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -
700C, -800, and -900 series airplanes, certificated in any category,
as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-22A1215, dated
November 22, 2013.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 22, Auto Flight.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports in which a single, undetected,
erroneous radio altimeter output caused the autothrottle to enter
landing flare retard mode prematurely on approach. We are issuing
this AD to prevent a single, undetected, erroneous radio altimeter
output from causing premature autothrottle landing flare retard and
subsequent loss of automatic speed control, which could result in
loss of control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Replacement

    Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-22A1215, dated November 22, 2013.

    (1) Remove any autothrottle computer, part number (P/N) 760SUE1-
1 (Boeing P/N 10-62017-51), 760SUE2-2 (Boeing P/N 10-62017-52),
760SUE2-3 (Boeing P/N 10-62017-53), or 760SUE2-4 (Boeing P/N 10-
62017-54), from the E1-1 electronics shelf.
    (2) Install a new or reworked autothrottle computer, P/N
760SUE2-5 (Boeing P/N 10-62017-55) at the E1-1 electronics shelf.

(h) Parts Installation Prohibition

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install an
autothrottle computer, part number 760SUE1-1 (Boeing P/N 10-62017-
51), 760SUE2-2 (Boeing P/N 10-62017-52), 760SUE2-3 (Boeing P/N 10-
62017-53), or 760SUE2-4 (Boeing P/N 10-62017-54), on any airplane.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph
(j)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(j) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Marie Hogestad,
Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 19, 2014.
Ross Landes,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-04500 Filed 2-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


The attached materials (two pdf files) describe the revisions to the Protocols (EMD-003 and EMD-004) under consideration in the Insect Repellent portion of the HSRB meeting. They should be placed on the docket with those protocols.

Thank you.

--

Scott P. Carroll, PhD

Department of Entomology

Center for Population Biology

University of California-Davis

Davis, CA 95616

Tel<PHONE_NUMBER>


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 113 (Wednesday, June 12, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35135]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13906]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2013-0369]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulation; Kelley's Island Swim, Lake Erie;
Kelley's Island, Lakeside, OH

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will regulate vessel movement in portions of
Lake Erie during the annual Kelley's Island Swim from. This special
local regulated area is necessary to protect swimmers from vessel
traffic.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 100.921 will be enforced between 7
a.m. and 11 a.m. on July 10, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice,
call or email MST2 Annaliese Ennis, Assistant Waterways Branch Chief,
Marine Safety Unit Toledo, 420 Madison Ave., Suite 700, Toledo, OH
43604; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the special
local regulations listed in 33 CFR 100.921 Special Local Regulation;
Kelley's Island Swim, Lake Erie, Lakeside, OH, which was published in
the December 3, 2012, issue of the Federal Register (77 FR 71531).
These special local regulations will be enforced from 7 a.m. until 11
a.m. on July 10, 2013. Pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 1236 and 33 CFR 27.3,
those who fail to comply with the special local regulations in 33 CFR
100.921 during this enforcement period will be subject to a civil
penalty of up to $8,000.
    Under the provisions of 33 CFR 100.921, vessels transiting within
the regulated area shall travel at a no-wake speed and remain vigilant
for event participants and safety craft. Additionally, vessels shall
yield right-of-way for event participants and event safety craft and
shall follow directions given by the Coast Guard's on-scene
representative or by event representatives during the event. The ``on-
scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port Detroit is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been designated
by the Captain of the Port Detroit to act on his behalf. The on-scene
representative of the Captain of the Port Detroit will be aboard either
a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port,
Sector Detroit or his designated on scene representative may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16.
    This notice is issued under the authority of 33 CFR 100.921 and 5
U.S.C. 552(a).

    Dated: May 28, 2013.
J. E. Ogden,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2013-13906 Filed 6-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: September 28, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 188)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 56921]
[DOCID:fr28se06-36]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0728; FRL-8225-2]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
WV; Emission Reductions to Meet Phase II of the Nitrogen Oxides (NOX);
SIP Call

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to convert a conditional approval in the West
Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) to a full approval. The SIP
revision pertains to nitrogen oxides (NOX) emission
reductions required in West Virginia to meet Phase II of the
NOX SIP Call (Phase II). In order to meet the Phase II
submission due date, the West Virginia Department of Environmental
Protection (WVDEP) adopted its Phase II requirements under its
emergency rule procedures. EPA granted conditional approval of the
emergency rule contingent upon the WVDEP adopting a permanent rule with
an effective date no later than the June 2, 2006 sunset date of its
emergency rule and submitting the permanent rule as a formal SIP
revision to EPA by July 1, 2006. West Virginia has met all the terms of
the conditional approval by adopting its permanent rule with an
effective date of May 1, 2006, and submitting the permanent rule to EPA
before July 1, 2006. In the Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is converting the conditional approval of the State's SIP
revision to a full approval as a direct final rule without prior
proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal
and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments
are received in response to this action, no further activity is
contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule
will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received in writing by October 30, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2006-0728 by one of the following methods:
    A. http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for

submitting comments.
    B. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0728, Makeba Morris, Chief, Air Quality
Planning Branch Name, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
    D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2006-0728. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site

is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be

automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some

information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov
 or in hard copy during normal business hours at the

Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the
State submittal are available at the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601 57th Street SE.,
Charleston, WV.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn Powers,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For further information, please see the
information provided in the direct final action, with the same title,
that is located in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this
Federal Register publication. Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.

    Dated: September 20, 2006.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region II.
 [FR Doc. E6-15983 Filed 9-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: January 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 5)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 1299-1300]
[DOCID:fr08ja08-16]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

29 CFR Part 1910

[Docket No. OSHA-2007-0024]
RIN 12187-AC23

Regulatory Flexibility Act Review of the Methylene Chloride
Standard

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Reopening of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSHA is reopening the comment period for its review of the
Methylene Chloride Standard under Section 610 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act and Section 5 of Executive Order 12866 on Regulatory
Planning and Review.

DATES: Written comments to OSHA must be sent or postmarked by March 10,
2008.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. OSHA-2007-
0024, by any of the following methods:
    Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal

eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions on-line for making
electronic submissions.
    Fax: If your submissions, including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
    Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger and courier service:
You must submit three copies of your comments and attachments to the
OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA-2007-0024, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger and courier service) are
accepted during the Department of Labor's and Docket Office's normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m.-4:45 p.m., Eastern Time.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and the
OSHA docket number for this rulemaking (OSHA-2007-0024). Submissions
are placed in the public docket without change and may be available
online at http://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, do not include private

materials such as social security numbers.
    Docket: To read or download submissions or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at

the address above. All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov
 index; however, some information (e.g.,

copyrighted material) is not publicly available to read or download
through the website. All submissions, including copyrighted material,
are available for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information and press
inquiries: Kevin Ropp, Office of Communications, Room N-3647,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone
(202) 693-1999. For technical inquiries: Joanna Dizikes Friedrich,
Directorate of Evaluation and Analysis, Occupational

Safety and Health Administration, Room N-3641, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax (202) 693-
1641.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OSHA is conducting a review of the Methylene
Chloride Standard (29 CFR 1910.1052) under Section 610 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Section 5 of Executive Order 12866 on
Regulatory Planning and Review. On July 10, 2007, OSHA provided
background information about the review, raised questions of special
concern to the Agency, and requested public comments (72 FR 37501). The
90-day comment period ended on October 9, 2007. In response to a
request for additional time to comment received from the Building and
Construction Trades Department, AFL-CIO, OSHA is reopening the comment
period for an additional 60 days. Accordingly, written comments must
now be submitted (sent or postmarked) by March 10, 2008. Granting this
additional time to comment on the review will allow this and other
stakeholders time to provide more thorough comments on the review which
in turn will give OSHA a more complete record.
    Authority: This document was prepared under the direction of Edwin
G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety
and Health, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. It is
issued under Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
610) and Section 5 of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993).

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of January, 2008.
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
 [FR Doc. E8-62 Filed 1-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-26-P