[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 91 (Friday, May 10, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20645-20646]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09646]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2019-0264]

Information Collection Request to Office of Management and
Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625-0105

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Sixty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting an extension of
its approval for the following collection of information: 1625-0105,
Regulated Navigation Area; Reporting Requirements for Barges Loaded
with Certain Dangerous Cargoes, Inland Rivers, Eighth Coast Guard
District and the Illinois Waterway, Ninth Coast Guard District; without
change. Our ICR describes the information we seek to collect from the
public. Before submitting this ICR to OIRA, the Coast Guard is inviting
comments as described below.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before July 9, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG-2019-0264] to the Coast Guard using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public
participation and request for comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available
from: COMMANDANT (CG-612), ATTN: PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT MANAGER, U.S.
COAST GUARD, 2703 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. AVE. SE, STOP 7710,
WASHINGTON, DC 20593-7710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Mr. Anthony Smith, Office of
Information Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for questions on these documents.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an application to
OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a Coast Guard
collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains information
describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's likely burden on
the affected public, an explanation of the necessity of the Collection,
and other important information describing the Collection. There is one
ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be
granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the
Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information
subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consistent with
the requirements of Executive Order 13771, Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs, and Executive Order 13777, Enforcing the
Regulatory Reform Agenda, the Coast Guard is also requesting comments
on the extent to which this request for information could be modified
to reduce the burden on respondents. In response to your comments, we
may revise this ICR or decide not to seek an extension of approval for
the Collection. We will consider all comments and material received
during the comment period.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. Comments must contain the OMB Control Number of
the ICR and the docket number of this request, [USCG-2019-0264], and
must be received by July 9, 2019.

Submitting Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal

eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document
for alternate instructions. Documents mentioned in this notice, and all
public comments, are in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).

Information Collection Request

    Title: Regulated Navigation Area; Reporting Requirements for Barges
Loaded with Certain Dangerous Cargoes, Inland Rivers, Eighth Coast
Guard District and the Illinois Waterway, Ninth Coast Guard District.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0105.
    Summary: The Coast Guard requires position and intended movement
reporting, and fleeting operations reporting, from barges carrying
certain dangerous cargoes (CDCs) in the inland rivers within the Eighth
and Ninth Coast Guard Districts. The reporting requirements are found
in 33 CFR 165.830 and 165.921.
    Need: This information is used to ensure port safety and security
and to ensure the uninterrupted flow of commerce.
    Forms: None.
    Respondents: Owners, agents, masters, towing vessel operators, or
persons-in-charge of barges loaded with CDCs or having CDC residue
operating on the inland rivers located within the Eighth and Ninth
Coast Guard Districts.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Hour Burden Estimate: The estimated annual burden remains 4 hours a
year.
    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35, as amended.

    Dated: May 6, 2019.
James D. Roppel,
U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Office of Information Management.
[FR Doc. 2019-09646 Filed 5-9-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: June 2, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 106)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 31351-31353]
[DOCID:fr02jn08-1]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.

========================================================================

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0247; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-003-AD;
Amendment 39-15540; AD 2008-11-17]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Air Tractor, Inc. AT-200, AT-300, AT-
400, AT-500, AT-600, and AT-800 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) to
supersede AD 2002-25-09, which applies to certain Air Tractor, Inc.
(Air Tractor) AT-250, AT-300, AT-400, and AT-500 series airplanes. AD
2002-25-09 currently requires you to install an overturn skid plate in
the cockpit area. Since we issued AD 2002-25-09, we received a report
of the bolts attaching the forward end of the original design overturn
skid plate to the airframe breaking in an overturn accident. This
allowed the skid plate to rotate around the rear attach point and the
forward end of the plate to enter the cockpit area. Consequently, this
AD would require the installation of a modified skid plate kit or
modification to skid plate kits that are already installed, including
those already installed on AT-402B, AT-502B, AT-602, and AT-802A series
airplanes during production. We are issuing this AD to prevent the
front and rear connections of the overturn skid plate to the airplane
from breaking, which could allow foreign debris to enter the cockpit
during an airplane overturn. This condition, if not corrected, could
lead to pilot injury.

DATES: This AD becomes effective on July 7, 2008.
    On July 7, 2008, the Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact Air
Tractor Inc., P.O. Box 485, Olney, Texas 76374; telephone: (940) 564-
5616; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To view the AD docket, go to U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, or on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov. The docket number is FAA-2008-0247;
Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-003-AD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andy McAnaul, Aerospace Engineer, ASW-
150, FAA San Antonio MIDO-43, 10100 Reunion Place, Suite 650, San
Antonio, Texas 78216, phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    On February 26, 2008, we issued a proposal to amend part 39 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that
would apply to certain Air Tractor, Inc. AT-200, 300, 400, 500, 600,
and 800 series airplanes. This proposal was published in the Federal
Register as a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on March 3, 2008 (73
FR 11369). The NPRM proposed to supersede AD 2002-25-09, which required
the installation of an overturn skid plate (part number (P/N) 11411-1-
500 or an FAA-approved equivalent P/N) in some production models
including Models AT-402B, AT-502B, AT-602, and AT-802A airplanes. Since
we issued AD 2002-25-09, we received a report of the bolts breaking in
an overturn accident where they attach the forward end of the original
design overturn skid plate to the airframe. This allowed the skid plate
to rotate around the rear attach point and the forward end of the plate
to enter the cockpit area. We are issuing this AD to prevent the front
and rear connections of the overturn skid plate to the airplane from
breaking, which could allow foreign debris to enter the cockpit during
an airplane overturn. This condition, if not corrected, could lead to
pilot injury.

Comments

    We provided the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the proposal or on the
determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that
air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed
except for minor editorial corrections. We have determined that these
minor corrections:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 2,026 airplanes in the U.S.
registry.
    In determining the total cost on U.S. operators, we presume that
all airplanes in the U.S. fleet have a skid plate installed (as
required by AD 2002-25-09), and the only cost is to incorporate the
modification kit P/N 11411-1-501. We estimate the following costs to do
the modification of installing the overturn skid plate modification kit
P/N 11411-1-501 to those planes that currently have the overturn skid
plate installed:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Total cost  per   Total cost on
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        airplane      U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 work-hours x $80 per hour = $160...........................             $42             $202         $409,252
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This AD includes a requirement for those few, if any, airplanes
that have not operated past the compliance time of AD 2002-25-09.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this AD.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD (and
other information as included in the Regulatory Evaluation) and placed
it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by sending a
request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket
No. FAA-2008-0247; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-003-AD'' in your
request.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2002-25-09, Amendment 39-12985 (67 FR 78156, December 23, 2002), and
adding the following new AD:

2008-11-17 Air Tractor, Inc.: Amendment 39-15540; Docket No. FAA-
2008-0247; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-003-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD becomes effective on July 7, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2002-25-09, Amendment 39-12985.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to the following airplane models and serial
numbers that are certificated in any category:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Models                            Serial Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AT-250, AT-300, AT-301, AT-302, AT-    -0001 through -1196.
 400, AT-400A, AT-401, AT-401A, AT-
 402, AT-402A, and AT-402B.
AT-501, AT-502, AT-502A, and AT-502B.  -0001 through -2620.
AT-602...............................  -0337 through -1153.
AT-802A..............................  -0003 through -0282.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unsafe Condition

    (d) Since we issued AD 2002-25-09, we received a report of the
bolts that attach the forward end of the original design overturn
skid plate to the airframe breaking in an overturn accident. This
allowed the skid plate to rotate around the rear attach point and
the forward end of the plate to enter the cockpit area. We are
issuing this AD to prevent the front and rear connections of the
overturn skid plate to the airplane from breaking, which could allow
foreign debris to enter the cockpit during an airplane overturn.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead to pilot injury.

Compliance

    (e) To address this problem, you must do the following, unless
already done:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Actions                 Compliance            Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) If overturn skid plate    Within the next 180   Follow Snow
 kit part number (P/N) 11411-  days after July 7,    Engineering Co.
 1-500 or an FAA-approved      2008 (the effective   Service Letter
 equivalent P/N is already     date of this AD).     97,
 installed, then install P/N                         revised November 7,
 11411-1-501 modification                            2007.
 kit.
(2) If there is no overturn   Within the next 180   Follow Snow
 skid plate installed, then    days July 7, 2008     Engineering Co.
 install overturn skid plate   (the effective date   Service Letter
 kit P/N 11411-1-502 or an     of this AD).          97,
 FAA-approved equivalent                             revised November 7,
 part number.                                        2007.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (f) The Manager, Fort Worth Airplane Certification Office, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Andy
McAnaul, Aerospace Engineer, ASW-150, FAA San Antonio MIDO-43, 10100
Reunion Place, Suite 650, San Antonio, Texas 78216, phone: (210)
308-3365; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (g) You must use Snow Engineering Co. Service Letter
97, revised November 7,

2007, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Air
Tractor Inc., P.O. Box 485, Olney, Texas 76374; telephone: (940)
564-5616; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) You may review copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or at
the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-
741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_
of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May 20, 2008.
David R. Showers,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-11944 Filed 5-30-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46895-46896]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19594]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2011-0022]

Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review; Reports,
Forms and Record Keeping Requirements

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department
of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR
describes the nature of the information collections and their expected
burden. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period was
published on March 22, 2011 [76 FR 16035]. No comments were received.
    This document describes the collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval. The collection of information
described is the ``Side Impact Phase in Reporting Requirements--Part
597.'' (OMB Control Number: 2127-0558)

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before September 2, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Christopher J. Wiacek at U.S.
Department of Transportation, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West
Building Room W43-419, NVS-112, Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Christopher
J. Wiacek's telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER> and fax number is (202)
366-7002.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

    Title: Side Impact Phase in Reporting Requirements--Part 597
    OMB Control Number: 2127-0558
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Abstract: 49 U.S.C. 30111 authorizes the issuance of Federal motor
vehicle safety standards (FMVSSs) and regulations. The agency, in
prescribing a FMVSS or regulations, considers available relevant motor
vehicle safety data, and consults with other agencies, as it deems
appropriate. Further, the statute mandates that in issuing any FMVSS or
regulation, the agency considers whether the standard or regulation is
``reasonable, practicable and appropriate for the particular type of
motor vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment for which it is
prescribed,'' and whether such a standard will contribute to carrying
out the purpose of the Act.
    The Secretary is authorized to invoke such rules and regulations,
as deemed necessary to carry out these requirements. Using this
authority, on September 11, 2007 the agency published a final rule (73
FR 51908) upgrading the requirements of FMVSS No. 214, ``Side impact
protection.'' The final rule contained a collection of information
because of the proposed phase-in reporting requirements. The collection
of information requires manufacturers of passenger cars, trucks, buses
and MPVs with a GVWR of 4,536 kg (10,000 lb) or less, to annually
submit a report, and maintain records related to the report, concerning
the number of such vehicles that meet the vehicle-to-pole and MDB test
requirements of FMVSS No. 214 during the three year phase-in of those
requirements. In response to petitions for reconsideration the agency
published a final rule (73 FR 32473) extending the phase-in of both the
pole and MDB test requirements to four years. The purpose of the
reporting and recordkeeping requirements is to assist the agency in
determining whether a manufacturer of vehicles has complied with the
requirements during the phase-in period.
    Affected Public: Businesses.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 1,260 hours

ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30 days, to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725-17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Departments estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection;

ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to
be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. A Comment to OMB
is most effective if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 28, 2011.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2011-19594 Filed 8-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register: April 10, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 70)]
[Notices]
[Page 19542-19544]
[DOCID:fr10ap08-104]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57617; File No. SR-NYSE-2008-25]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Extend the Pilot Program for Providing Liquidity on the NYSE Bonds\SM\
System

April 4, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 31, 2008, the New York Stock Exchange LLC ( ``NYSE'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items

have been substantially prepared by NYSE. The Exchange has designated
this proposal as one establishing or changing a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act
\3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to extend the pilot program pursuant to which
liquidity providers receive a $20 credit for bond trades executed on
the NYSE Bonds\SM\ system (``NYSE Bonds'') with an execution size of
less than 20 bonds. The text of the proposed rule change is available
at the Exchange's principal office, in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, and at http://www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NYSE included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. NYSE has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to extend for nine months the pilot program
pursuant to which liquidity providers receive a $20 credit for bond
trades executed on NYSE Bonds with an execution size of less than 20
bonds. The pilot program would thus end on December 31, 2008.
    A liquidity provider is one who posts liquidity to NYSE Bonds.
During the course of clearing their bond trades, liquidity providers
absorb clearing costs. In order to offset these clearing costs,
liquidity providers may increase the offer price or decrease the bid
price of the bond. In doing so, the best execution of a bond order may
be compromised, as clearing costs increase with smaller orders.
    Accordingly, the Exchange proposes that liquidity providers
continue to be issued a $20 credit for executions of bond orders with
an execution size of less than 20 bonds through December 31, 2008. For
a liquidity provider to be eligible to receive this $20 credit, the
original order posted by the liquidity provider must be for 20 bonds or
more. For example, if a liquidity provider posts an order for 100 bonds
and a contra side order comes in for 50 bonds, the liquidity provider
will not receive a $20 credit. However, if a contra side order comes in
for 10 bonds against the liquidity provider's original posted order of
100 bonds, the liquidity provider will receive a credit of $20 from the
Exchange for that execution.
    NYSE Bonds, which was implemented in March 2007, will continue to
update its functionality to provide competitive bond trading for
customers. The Exchange believes that this $20 credit will continue to
incentivize liquidity providers to display the best price available on
NYSE Bonds.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act \5\ in general and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \6\ in particular, in that
it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges among its members and other persons using
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing rule change establishes or changes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange, it has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and subparagraph (f)(2)
of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\8\ At any time within 60 days of the filing
of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such
rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2008-25 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2008-25. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of NYSE. All comments
received will be posted

without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSE-2008-25 and should be submitted on or before May 1,
2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-7513 Filed 4-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 175 (Friday, September 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55998-55999]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23036]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-65250; File No. SR-CBOE-2011-084]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Delete Obsolete Language From the CBOE Stock
Exchange Fees Schedule

September 2, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 31, 2011, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to delete obsolete language from the CBOE
Stock Exchange (``CBSX'') Fees Schedule. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.org/legal), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the
Commission.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received

on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be
examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has
prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    CBSX normally applies the CBOE Trading Permit Holder Application
Fees (the ``Fees'') to any applicant that applies to be a CBSX Trading
Permit Holder. For the month of August 2011 only, CBSX held a ``pricing
special,'' waiving such Fees and not charging any fees for applications
to become a CBSX Trading Permit Holder (the ``Fee Waiver'').\3\ The
Fees Schedule was amended to state that the Fees would be waived for
the month of August, 2011. However, once the month of August, 2011 is
over, the reference in the CBSX Fees Schedule to the Fee Waiver will be
obsolete. As such, the Exchange proposes to delete such reference, with
such proposed deletion to take effect September 1, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-65057 (August 8,
2011), 76 FR 50518 (August 15, 2011) (SR-CBOE-2011-070).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act,\4\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \5\
of the Act in particular. By removing an obsolete reference in the CBSX
Fees Schedule, the proposed rule change alleviates any potential
confusion, thereby perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market
and national system, and, in general, protecting investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The proposed rule change is designated by the Exchange as
establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge, thereby
qualifying for effectiveness on filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act \6\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 \7\ thereunder. At
any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2011-084 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2011-084. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2011-084 and should be
submitted on or before September 30, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-23036 Filed 9-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60804-60807]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24040]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0836; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-126-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede airworthiness directive (AD) 2005-07-
12 that applies to certain The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -
200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. AD 2005-07-12 requires
detailed and eddy current inspections to detect cracking of the frame
web around the cutout for the doorstop intercostal strap at the aft
side of the station (STA) 291.5 frame at stringer 16R, and corrective
action if necessary. Since we issued AD 2005-07-12, we received reports
of new findings of cracking at various locations of the STA 277 to STA
291.5 frames and intercostals, including webs, chords, clips, and shear
ties, between stringers 7R and 17R. This proposed AD would add new
inspections for cracking at the forward galley door cutout, and
corrective actions if necessary. This proposed AD would also reduce a
certain inspection threshold required by AD 2005-07-12. We are
proposing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the aft
frame and frame support structure of the forward galley door, which
could result in a severed fuselage frame web, rapid decompression of
the airplane, and possible loss of the forward galley door.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 18,
2013.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:

     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box
3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Pohl, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6450; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0836;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-126-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On March 25, 2005, we issued AD 2005-07-12, Amendment 39-14036 (70
FR 17596, April 7, 2005), for certain The Boeing Company Model 737-100,
-200, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. AD 2005-07-12 requires
repetitive detailed and eddy current inspections to detect cracking of
the frame web around the cutout for the doorstop intercostal strap at
the aft side of STA 291.5 frame at stringer 16R, and corrective actions
if necessary. We issued AD 2005-07-12 to detect and correct fatigue
cracking of the aft frame and frame support structure of the forward
galley door.

Actions Since AD 2005-07-12, Amendment 39-14036 (70 FR 17596, April 7,
2005) Was Issued

    Since we issued AD 2005-07-12, Amendment 39-14036 (70 FR 17596,
April 7, 2005) Boeing has received 24 reports of cracking of the STA
291.5 frame web around the doorstop intercostal strap cutout at
stringer 16R. There have been 23 reports of cracks propagating down
from the lower radius of the cutout on airplanes that had accumulated
between 35,597 and 68,133 total flight cycles. Boeing also received one
report of a crack propagating outboard from the upper radius through
two countersunk fastener locations on an airplane that had accumulated
31,611 total flight cycles. In addition, Boeing received reports of
cracking in other areas of the forward galley door cutout that are
determined to be safety related.

Relevant Service Information

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1241, Revision 1,
dated June 11, 2013. For information on the procedures and compliance
times, see this service information at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for Docket No. FAA-2013-0836.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    Although this proposed AD does not explicitly restate the
requirements of AD 2005-07-12, Amendment 39-14036 (70 FR 17596, April
7, 2005) this proposed AD would retain all of the requirements of AD
2005-07-12. Those requirements are referenced in the service
information identified previously, which, in turn, is referenced in
paragraph (h) of this proposed AD. For certain airplanes, this proposed
AD would reduce the compliance threshold for a certain inspection. This
proposed AD would also require accomplishing the actions identified in
the service information identified previously, except as discussed
under ``Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service
Information.''
    The phrase ``corrective actions'' is used in this proposed AD.
``Corrective actions'' are actions that correct or address any
condition found. Corrective actions in an AD could include, for
example, repairs.

Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service Information

    Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1241, Revision 1, dated June
11, 2013, specifies to contact the manufacturer for instructions on how
to repair certain conditions, but this proposed AD would require
repairing those conditions in one of the following ways:
     In accordance with a method that we approve; or
     Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) whom we have
authorized to make those findings.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 419 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
             Action                  Labor cost           Parts cost       Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections [retained from AD    2 work-hours x $85  None...............  $170 per            $71,230 per
 2005-07-12, Amendment            per hour = $170                          inspection cycle.   inspection cycle.
 39[dash]14036 (70 FR 17596)].    per inspection
                                  cycle.
Inspections [new proposed        40 work-hours x     None...............  $3,400 per          $1,424,600 per
 action].                         $85 per hour =                           inspection cycle.   inspection cycle.
                                  $3,400 per
                                  inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
a cost estimate for the on-condition actions specified in the service
information.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This proposed regulation is
within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in
this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2005-07-12, Amendment 39-14036 (70 FR 17596, April 7, 2005), and adding
the following new AD:

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2013-0836; Directorate Identifier
2013-NM-126-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by November 18,
2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes AD 2005-07-12, Amendment 39-14036 (70 FR
17596, April 7, 2005).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -
200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes, as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1241, Revision 1, dated June 11, 2013.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of new findings of cracking at
various locations of the stations (STA) 277 to STA 291.5 frames and
intercostals, including webs, chords, clips, and shear ties, between
stringers 7R and 17R. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
fatigue cracking of the aft frame and frame support structure of the
forward galley door, which could result in a severed fuselage frame
web, rapid decompression of the airplane, and possible loss of the
forward galley door.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Group 1 Airplanes: Inspections and Corrective Actions

    For airplanes identified as Group 1 in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1241, Revision 1, dated June 11, 2013: Within 120
days after the effective date of this AD, do inspections for
cracking from STA 277 to STA 328, stringer 7R to 17R of the forward
galley door cutout, using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this AD. Do all applicable
corrective actions before further flight using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this
AD.

(h) Group 2 and Group 3 Airplanes: Inspections and Corrective Actions

    (1) For airplanes identified as Group 2 and Group 3 in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1241, Revision 1, dated June 11, 2013:
Except as provided by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, at the applicable
times specified in tables 1 and 2 in paragraph 1.E, ``Compliance,''
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1241, Revision 1, dated June
11, 2013, do detailed and surface HFEC inspections, as applicable,
for cracking in the forward galley door cutout, in accordance with
Part 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1241, Revision 1, dated June 11, 2013. Repeat the
detailed and surface HFEC inspections thereafter at the applicable
intervals specified in tables 1 and 2 in paragraph 1.E,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1241,
Revision 1, dated June 11, 2013. If any crack is found, before
further flight, do all applicable corrective actions in accordance
with Part 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1241, Revision 1, dated June 11, 2013,
except as required by paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. Doing the repair
in accordance with Part 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1241, Revision 1, dated June
11, 2013, terminates the repetitive inspections required by this
paragraph for the repaired area only.
    (2) Removal and replacement of a cracked part, in accordance
with Part 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1241, Revision 1, dated June 11, 2013, does
not terminate the

repetitive inspections required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.

(i) Optional Terminating Action

    Accomplishment of the preventive modification on the STA 291.5
frame web, in accordance with Part 2 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1241, Revision
1, dated June 11, 2013, terminates the repetitive inspections
required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD for the area that is common
to the preventive modification.

(j) Exceptions to the Service Information

    (1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1241, Revision 1,
dated June 11, 2013, specifies to contact Boeing for a corrective
action: Before further flight, do the applicable action using a
method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (l) of this AD.
    (2) Where paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1241, Revision 1, dated June 11, 2013,
specifies a compliance time ``after the date on Revision 1 of this
service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within the specified
compliance time after the effective date of this AD.

(k) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, if those actions were performed before
the effective date of this AD using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1241, dated June 13, 2002, which is not incorporated by
reference in this AD.

(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (m) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) AMOCs approved for the actions specified in AD 2005-07-12,
Amendment 39-14036 (70 FR 17596, April 7, 2005), are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this AD.

(m) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Alan Pohl,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Ave. SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington on September 25, 2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-24040 Filed 10-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


        \s \* MERGEFORMATUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                  REGION III
                               1650 Arch Street
                    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  19103-2029

										May 23, 2012
Mr. David K. Paylor, Director
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
P.O. Box 1105
Richmond, Virginia 23218

Dear Mr. Paylor:

      On April 26, 2012, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality which repeals duplicative administrative regulations from Virginia's inspection and maintenance (I/M) regulations found in 9VAC5, Chapter 91.  EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete.

	If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Mr. Harold A. Frankford at<PHONE_NUMBER>.  He is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

	Sincerely,

						    /s/

                                        Diana Esher, Director
                                                                      Air Protection Division  \s \* MERGEFORMAT


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57770-57771]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26330]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4347-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

Kansas; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Kansas (FEMA-4347-DR), dated November 7,
2017, and related determinations.

DATES: The declaration was issued November 7, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated November 7, 2017, the President issued a major disaster
declaration under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the
``Stafford Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State
of Kansas resulting from severe storms, straight-line winds, and
flooding during the period of July 22-27, 2017, is of sufficient
severity and magnitude to warrant a major disaster declaration under
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act,
42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford Act''). Therefore, I declare
that such a major disaster exists in the State of Kansas.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Public Assistance in the
designated areas and

Hazard Mitigation throughout the State. Consistent with the
requirement that Federal assistance be supplemental, any Federal
funds provided under the Stafford Act for Hazard Mitigation will be
limited to 75 percent of the total eligible costs. Federal funds
provided under the Stafford Act for Public Assistance also will be
limited to 75 percent of the total eligible costs, with the
exception of projects that meet the eligibility criteria for a
higher Federal cost-sharing percentage under the Public Assistance
Alternative Procedures Pilot Program for Debris Removal implemented
pursuant to section 428 of the Stafford Act.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, David G. Samaniego, of FEMA is
appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major
disaster.
    The following areas of the State of Kansas have been designated as
adversely affected by this major disaster:

    Johnson and Wyandotte Counties for Public Assistance.
    All areas within the State of Kansas are eligible for assistance
under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-26330 Filed 12-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 242 (Monday, December 19, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77485-77487]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27397]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0993; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-00295-T;
Amendment 39-22262; AD 2022-25-06]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited
(Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited Model DHC-8-402
airplanes. This AD was prompted by an investigation that found that the
actual operating temperatures within the integrated flight cabinet
(IFC) were significantly higher than anticipated during certification.
This AD requires a modification to improve the IFC cooling capacity.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: This AD is effective January 23, 2023.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of January 23,
2023.

ADDRESSES:
    AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2022-0993; or in person at Docket Operations between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this final rule, the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
    Material Incorporated by Reference:
     For service information identified in this final rule,
contact De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited, Dash 8 Series Customer
Response Centre, 5800 Explorer Drive, Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 5K9,
Canada; telephone North America (toll-free):<PHONE_NUMBER>, Direct: 647-
277-5820; email dehavilland.com">[email protected]dehavilland.com; website dehavilland.com.
     You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2022-0993.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gabriel Kim, Aerospace Engineer,
Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services Section, FAA, New York
ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain De Havilland
Aircraft of Canada Limited Model DHC-8-402 airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on August 12, 2022 (87 FR 49776). The
NPRM was prompted by AD CF-2022-09, dated March 3, 2022, issued by
Transport Canada, which is the aviation authority for Canada (referred
to after this as the MCAI) (Transport Canada CF-2022-09). The MCAI
states that as a result of higher-than-expected failure rates in
service, the supplier's investigation found that actual operating
temperatures within the IFC were significantly higher than anticipated
during certification. Consequently, the reliability of the IFC module
does not meet safety objectives. The MCAI further states this failure
mode could lead to uncontrolled autopilot pitch trim servo runaway and/
or failure of the stall warning and stick pusher, resulting in reduced
controllability of the airplane.
    In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require a modification to improve
the IFC cooling capacity. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2022-0993.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received comments from the Air Line Pilots Association,
International (ALPA), who supported the NPRM without change.
    The FAA received an additional comment from Horizon Air. The
following presents the comment received on the NPRM and the FAA's
response to each comment.

Request To Exclude Job Set-Up and Close-Out

    Horizon Air requested that the final rule mandate only paragraph
3.B., ``Procedure,'' of the Accomplishment Instructions of De Havilland
Service Bulletin 84-21-24, Revision B, dated Oct 13, 2021, because that
corrects the unsafe condition. Horizon Air stated that paragraph 3.A.
``Job Set-up,'' and paragraph 3.C., ``Close Out'' of the Accomplishment
Instructions of De Havilland Service Bulletin 84-21-24, Revision B,
dated Oct 13, 2021, do not directly correct the unsafe condition. The
commenter stated that incorporating the ``Job Set-up'' and ``Close
Out'' procedures as a requirement of the AD restricts an operator's
ability to perform other maintenance in conjunction with the
incorporation of the service information.
    The FAA agrees with the requested change for the reasons provided
by the commenter. In addition, this change corresponds to Transport
Canada AD CF-2022-09, dated March 3, 2022. The FAA has revised
paragraph (g) of this AD accordingly.

Conclusion

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another

country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, it
has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the
comments received, and determined that air safety requires adopting
this AD as proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on this product. Except for minor editorial
changes, and any other changes described previously, this AD is adopted
as proposed in the NPRM. None of the changes will increase the economic
burden on any operator.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited has issued Service Bulletin
84-21-24, Revision B, dated October 13, 2021. This service information
specifies procedures for a modification to improve the IFC cooling
capacity. The tasks include reworking the forward and aft avionics rack
side panels, removing the piccolo tube assemblies, doing a general
visual inspection for contamination of the IFCs and avionics rack,
cleaning any contamination found, installing and routing new cooling
ducts, and installing two new extraction plenums in the avionics rack
cooling system.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 56 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11 work-hours x $85 per hour = $935..........................          $6,950           $7,885         $441,560
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate.
According to the manufacturer, however, some or all of the costs of
this AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact
on affected operators.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2022-25-06 De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.): Amendment 39-22262; Docket No.
FAA-2022-0993; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-00295-T

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective January 23, 2023.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (Type
Certificate previously held by Bombardier Inc.) Model DHC-8-402
airplanes, certificated in any category, serial numbers 4095 through
4633 inclusive.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 21, Air
Conditioning System.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by an investigation that found that the
actual operating temperatures within the integrated flight cabinet
(IFC) were significantly higher than anticipated during the
certification. Consequently, the reliability of the IFC module does
not meet safety objectives. The FAA is issuing this AD to address
the high operating temperatures within the IFC, which could lead to
uncontrolled autopilot pitch trim servo runaway and failure of the
stall warning and stick pusher, resulting in reduced controllability
of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    Within 8,000 flight hours or 48 months, whichever occurs first,
from the effective date of this AD, do a modification to improve the
IFC cooling capacity, in accordance with paragraph 3.B.,
``Procedure,'' of the Accomplishment Instructions of De Havilland
Aircraft of Canada Limited Service Bulletin 84-21-24, Revision B,
dated Oct 13, 2021.

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using De Havilland Aircraft

of Canada Limited Service Bulletin 84-21-24, Revision A, dated
August 20, 2021.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If
sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada; or De Havilland Aircraft of Canada
Limited's Transport Canada Design Approval Organization (DAO). If
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature.

(j) Additional Information

    (1) Refer to Transport Canada AD CF-2022-09, dated March 3,
2022, for related information. This Transport Canada AD may be found
in the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2022-0993.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Gabriel Kim,
Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services
Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].
    (3) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (k)(3) and (4) of this AD.

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited Service Bulletin 84-
21-24, Revision B, dated Oct 13, 2021.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact De
Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited, Dash 8 Series Customer
Response Centre, 5800 Explorer Drive, Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 5K9,
Canada; telephone North America (toll-free):<PHONE_NUMBER>, Direct:
647-277-5820; email dehavilland.com">[email protected]dehavilland.com; website dehavilland.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email [email protected], or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on November 30, 2022.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-27397 Filed 12-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 165 (Thursday, August 25, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58392-58394]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20290]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 31090; Amdt. No. 3708]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule amends, suspends, or removes Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports. These
regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or revised
criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National Airspace
System, such as the commissioning of new navigational facilities,
adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements. These
changes are designed to provide for the safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective August 25, 2016. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions. The incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of
the Federal Register as of August 25, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:

For Examination

    1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Ops-M30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., West Bldg., Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
    2. The FAA Air Traffic Organization Service Area in which the
affected airport is located;
    3. The office of Aeronautical Navigation Products, 6500 South
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
    For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call
202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

Availability

    All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available online free
of charge. Visit the National Flight Data Center online at nfdc.faa.gov
to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP
copies may be obtained from the FAA Air Traffic Organization Service
Area in which the affected airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Nichols, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS-420) Flight Technologies and Procedures Division,
Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) by amending the referenced SIAPs.
The complete regulatory description of each SIAP is listed on the
appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the National Flight Data
Center (NFDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P-NOTAM), and is incorporated
by reference under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR 97.20.
The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the need for a
special format make their verbatim publication in the Federal Register
expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use the regulatory
text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction on charts
printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP contained on FAA form documents is
unnecessary.
    This amendment provides the affected CFR sections, and specifies
the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs with their applicable effective
dates. This amendment also identifies the airport and its location, the
procedure and the amendment number.

Availability and Summary of Material Incorporated by Reference

    The material incorporated by reference is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
    The material incorporated by reference describes SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs as identified in the amendatory language for part 97
of this final rule.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each

separate SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP as amended in the
transmittal. For safety and timeliness of change considerations, this
amendment incorporates only specific changes contained for each SIAP
and Takeoff Minimums and ODP as modified by FDC permanent NOTAMs.
    The SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, as modified by FDC
permanent NOTAM, and contained in this amendment are based on the
criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for Terminal Instrument
Procedures (TERPS). In developing these changes to SIAPs and Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied only to specific
conditions existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in
this rule have been previously issued by the FAA in a FDC NOTAM as an
emergency action of immediate flight safety relating directly to
published aeronautical charts.
    The circumstances that created the need for these SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP amendments require making them effective in less than
30 days.
    Because of the close and immediate relationship between these
SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find
that notice and public procedure under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are
impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where
applicable, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d), good cause exists for making these
SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air traffic control, Airports, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 29, 2016.
John S. Duncan,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal regulations, Part 97, (14 CFR part 97), is amended by
amending Standard Instrument Approach Procedures and Takeoff Minimums
and ODPs, effective at 0901 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113,
40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

Sec. Sec.  97.23, 97.25, 97.27, 97.29, 97.31, 97.33, 97.35  [Amended]

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:
    By amending: Sec.  97.23 VOR, VOR/DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or
TACAN; Sec.  97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; Sec.
97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; Sec.  97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
Sec.  97.31 RADAR SIAPs; Sec.  97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and Sec.  97.35 COPTER
SIAPs, Identified as follows:

* * * Effective Upon Publication

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      AIRAC date          State           City            Airport        FDC No.      FDC date       Subject
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15-Sep-16............  OH           Port Clinton....  Erie-Ottawa           6/1559      7/21/16  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Intl.                                      27, Amdt 1A.
15-Sep-16............  OH           Port Clinton....  Erie-Ottawa           6/1560      7/21/16  NDB RWY 27,
                                                       Intl.                                      Amdt 14A.
15-Sep-16............  MN           Alexandria......  Chandler Field.       6/2704      7/21/16  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                                                31, Orig-C.
15-Sep-16............  MS           Okolona.........  Okolona Muni-         6/3355      7/21/16  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Richard                                    18, Amdt 1.
                                                       Stovall Field.
15-Sep-16............  MS           Okolona.........  Okolona Muni-         6/3390      7/21/16  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Richard                                    36, Amdt 1.
                                                       Stovall Field.
15-Sep-16............  OH           Port Clinton....  Erie-Ottawa           6/5245      7/21/16  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Intl.                                      9, Amdt 1.
15-Sep-16............  AL           Troy............  Troy Muni             6/5673      7/21/16  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Airport At N                               14, Amdt 1.
                                                       Kenneth
                                                       Campbell Field.
15-Sep-16............  AL           Troy............  Troy Muni             6/5678      7/21/16  NDB RWY 7, Amdt
                                                       Airport At N                               12.
                                                       Kenneth
                                                       Campbell Field.
15-Sep-16............  AL           Troy............  Troy Muni             6/5681      7/21/16  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Airport At N                               32, Amdt 1.
                                                       Kenneth
                                                       Campbell Field.
15-Sep-16............  NC           New Bern........  Coastal               6/7249      7/21/16  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                       Carolina                                   4, Amdt 1.
                                                       Regional.
15-Sep-16............  OK           Tulsa...........  Richard Lloyd         6/7313      7/21/16  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Jones Jr.                                  1L, Orig.
15-Sep-16............  OK           Tulsa...........  Richard Lloyd         6/7314      7/21/16  VOR/DME-A, Amdt
                                                       Jones Jr.                                  7.
15-Sep-16............  IL           Moline..........  Quad City Intl.       6/8934      7/21/16  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                31, Amdt 1A.
15-Sep-16............  FL           Tampa...........  Peter O Knight.       6/9473      7/13/16  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                22, Amdt 2A.
15-Sep-16............  FL           Tampa...........  Peter O Knight.       6/9474      7/13/16  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                36, Amdt 2B.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2016-20290 Filed 8-24-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:I am writing to inform you that I feel a 75 day period time to review the proposed regulations is insufficient. I hereby request that the review period be extended to 180 days.


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36274-36275]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14783]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-R04-OW-2011-0937; FRL-9688-2]

Public Water System Supervision Program Revision for the State of
Alabama

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of tentative approval.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the State of Alabama is revising
its approved Public Water System Supervision Program. Alabama has
adopted the following rules: Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule, Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule, and
Stage 2 Disinfection/Disinfection Byproducts Rule. EPA has determined
that Alabama's rules are no less stringent than the corresponding
federal regulations. Therefore, EPA is tentatively approving this
revision to the State of Alabama's Public Water System Supervision
Program.

DATES: Any interested person may request a public hearing. A request
for a public hearing must be submitted by July 18, 2012, to the
Regional Administrator at the EPA Region 4 address shown below. The
Regional Administrator may deny frivolous or insubstantial requests for
a hearing. However, if a substantial request for a public hearing is
made by July 18, 2012, a public hearing will be held. If EPA Region 4
does not receive a timely and appropriate request for a hearing and the
Regional Administrator does not elect to hold a hearing on her own
motion, this determination shall become final and effective on July 18,
2012. Any request for a public hearing shall include the following
information: The name, address, and telephone number of the individual,
organization, or other entity requesting a hearing; a brief statement
of the requesting person's interest in the Regional Administrator's
determination and a brief statement of the information that the
requesting person intends to submit at such hearing; and the signature
of the individual making the request, or, if the request is made on
behalf of an organization or other entity, the signature of a
responsible official of the organization or other entity.

ADDRESSES: All documents relating to this determination are available
for inspection between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, at the following offices: Alabama Department of
Environmental Management, Drinking Water Branch,

1400 Coliseum Boulevard, Montgomery, Alabama 36130; and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Safe Drinking Water Branch,
61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Smith, EPA Region 4, Safe
Drinking Water Branch, at the address given above, by telephone at
(404) 562-9845, or at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Authority:  Section 1413 of the Safe Drinking Water Act, as
amended (1996), and 40 CFR Part 142.

    Dated: June 5, 2012.
Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2012-14783 Filed 6-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 28, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 29251]
[FR Doc No: C1-2017-13305]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

 Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 33

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0586; Notice No. 33-17-01-SC]

Special Conditions: Safran Aircraft Engines, Silvercrest-2 SC-2D;
Rated Takeoff Thrust at High Ambient Temperature

Correction

    Proposed Rule document 2016-13305 appearing on pages 28788 through
28790 in the issue of Monday, June 26, 2017 was withdrawn from public
inspection and published in error. It should be removed.

[FR Doc. C1-2017-13305 Filed 6-27-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1505-01-D