[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 8, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 53569]
[FR Doc No: 2023-16880]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-98040; File No. SR-ISE-2023-11]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend the Short Term Option Series Program in Supplementary
Material .03 of Options 4, Section 5

August 2, 2023.
    On May 31, 2023, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend the Short
Term Option Series Program in Supplementary Material .03 of Options 4,
Section 5. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on June 20, 2023.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97719 (June 13,
2023), 88 FR 39876.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that, within 45 days of
the publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding, or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is August 4, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is extending this 45-day time period. The Commission
finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer period within which
to take action on the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient
time to consider the proposed rule change. Accordingly, the Commission,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\5\ designates September 18,
2023, as the date by which the Commission shall either approve or
disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-ISE-2023-11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-16880 Filed 8-7-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: April 30, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 82)]
[Notices]
[Page 21257-21258]
[DOCID:fr30ap07-63]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0707; FRL-8307-1]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; NSPS for the Graphic Arts
Industry (Renewal), EPA ICR Number 0657.09, OMB Control Number 2060-
0105

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR that is abstracted below describes the
nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before May 30, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2006-0707, to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), or by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:

EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency,
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center, mail code
2201T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB
at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Schaefer, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Sector Policies and Programs Division (D243-
05), Measurement Policy Group, Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number: (919)
541-0296; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On October 5, 2006 (71 FR 58853), EPA sought comments on this
ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any
additional comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB
within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0707, which is available for public viewing
online at http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the

Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>
and the telephone number for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and
Information Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://www.regulations.gov
 to submit or view public comments, access the index

listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in
the docket that are available electronically. Once in the system,
select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified
above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public
viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, as EPA receives them and without

change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about the electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov
.

    Title: NSPS for the Graphic Arts Industry (Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 0657.09, OMB Control Number 2060-0105.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on September 31, 2007.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: This Information Collection Request (ICR) renewal is
being submitted for the NSPS for the Graphic Arts Industry (40 CFR part
60, subpart QQ), which were promulgated on November 8, 1982. These
standards apply to the following: each publication rotogravure printing
press (not including proof press) commencing construction, modification
or reconstruction after the date of proposal (October 28, 1980). Owners
and operators of facilities subject to NSPS must notify EPA of
construction, reconstruction, anticipated and actual startup dates, and
results of performance tests. Records of performance test results,
shutdowns, and malfunctions must be maintained. These notifications,
reports, and records are essential in determining compliance and are
required, in general, of all sources subject to NSPS.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 37
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Graphic arts facilities are
potentially affected.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 19.
    Frequency of Response: Initially and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 1,718.

    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $108,663, which includes $0 annualized
Capital Startup costs, $0 annualized Operation and Maintenance costs,
and $108,663 annualized Labor costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is no change in the total estimated
burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR
Burdens.

    Dated: April 19, 2007.
Sara Hisel-McCoy,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
 [FR Doc. E7-8167 Filed 4-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45147-45148]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16396]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 1256-031]

Loup River Public Power District; Notice of Availability of Final
Environmental Assessment

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) regulations,
18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy
Projects has reviewed the application for a new license for the Loup
River Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 1256), located on the
Loup River in Nance and Platte Counties, Nebraska, and prepared a final
environmental assessment (EA).
    In the final EA, Commission staff analyzes the potential
environmental effects of licensing the project, and concludes that
issuing a new license for

the project, with appropriate environmental measures, would not
constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality
of the human environment.
    A copy of the final EA is available for review at the Commission in
the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site
at www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits, in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,
202-502-8659.
    You may also register online at www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    For further information, please contact Chelsea Hudock at (202)
502-8448 or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Lee Emery by
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: July 5, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-16396 Filed 7-11-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 173 (Thursday, September 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54998-55000]
[FR Doc No: 2022-19406]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD22-14-000]

Commission Information Collection Activities (Proposed FERC-1001
and FERC-1002); Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of proposed information collections and request for
comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or
FERC) staff is soliciting public comment on the proposed surveys FERC-
1001 (Hotline and Helpline Survey) and FERC-1002 (Customer Engagement
Management Survey).

DATES: Comments on the proposed collections of information are due
November 7, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments (identified by Docket No. AD22-14-
000) by the following methods. Electronic filing through http://www.ferc.gov, is preferred.
     Electronic Filing: Documents must be filed in acceptable
native applications and print-to-PDF, but not in scanned or picture
format.
     For those unable to file electronically, comments may be
filed by USPS mail or by hand (including courier) delivery.
    [cir] Mail via U.S. Postal Service only, addressed to: Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First
Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    [cir] Hand (including courier) delivery to: Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Please identify whether your comments relate to proposed collection
FERC-1001 (Hotline and Helpline Survey) and/or FERC-1002 (Customer
Engagement Management Survey).
    Instructions: All submissions must be formatted and filed in
accordance with submission guidelines at: Guides [bond] Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (ferc.gov) (https://www.ferc.gov/guides). For
user assistance, contact FERC Online Support by email at
ferc.gov">[email protected]ferc.gov, or by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll-free).
    Docket: Users interested in receiving automatic notification of
activity in this docket may subscribe to the docket using
eSubscription, FERC Online--Log In (https://ferconline.ferc.gov/LogIn.aspx). Users interested in viewing or downloading comments and
issuances in this docket may do so using eLibrary, eLibrary [bond]
General search (ferc.gov) (https://elibrary.ferc.gov/eLibrary/search).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Lozano may be reached at
[email protected] by email or telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Titles: Proposed FERC-1001 (Hotline and Helpline Survey) and FERC-
1002 (Customer Engagement Management Survey).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The proposed surveys will not be published in the Federal
Register but will be available as part of this notice in the
Commission's eLibrary system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OMB Control Nos: 1902-TBD.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ We anticipate having one OMB Control No. that would include
both proposed FERC-1001 and proposed FERC-1002.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Type of Request: Request for proposed new information collections.
    Abstract:

Proposed FERC-1001

    This proposed survey covers the Office of Public Participation
(OPP) helpline, Customer Engagement helpline, Landowner helpline,
Alternative Dispute Resolution helpline, Electric Quarterly Report
(EQR) helpline, and the Enforcement hotline.\3\ The contact information
voluntarily provided and collected is listed in Attachment A to this
notice. FERC collects contact information voluntarily

provided by members of the public who contact FERC to obtain assistance
with navigating FERC matters. Members of the public typically contact
FERC helplines and its Enforcement hotline seeking assistance with
understanding specific issues that impact their property and
communities, businesses, or marketplace. Other times, members of the
public contact FERC seeking to understand how to express their
opinions, views, and concerns regarding energy policy developments,
energy infrastructure projects, or a specific case pending before FERC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Proposed FERC--1001 covers five helplines and one hotline:
OPP Helpline:<PHONE_NUMBER>; ferc.gov">[email protected]ferc.gov; Customer Engagement
Helpline:<PHONE_NUMBER>; 1-866-208-3372; ferc.gov">[email protected]ferc.gov; Landowner
Helpline: 1-877-337-2237; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; ferc.gov">[email protected]ferc.gov;
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Helpline: 1-844-238-1560; fax
202-219-2730; ferc.gov">[email protected]ferc.gov; Electric Quarterly Report (EQR)
Helpline:<PHONE_NUMBER>; ferc.gov">[email protected]ferc.gov. Enforcement Hotline: 202-502-
8390; 1-888-889-8030; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; https:ferc.gov">//www.ferc.gov/enforcement-legal/enforcement-hotline/[email protected]ferc.gov; https://www.ferc.gov/enforcement-legal/enforcement/enforcement-hotline/contact-hotline-staff-anonymously.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Members of the public, including company representatives, contact
FERC to indicate their interest in obtaining information to facilitate
fulfilling their compliance obligations under the Commission's Electric
Quarterly Reports regulations or to seek support or guidance with
filing their Electric Quarterly Reports. Further, FERC invites market
participants and the general public to contact FERC to report market
activities or transactions that may be market manipulation, fraud, an
abuse of an affiliate relationship, a tariff violation, a violation of
a Commission order, or other possible violation. FERC receives the
contact information or specified data to provide customer service. Data
is used to respond to the customer's question. Data is also used in an
aggregated manner to identify areas that require additional
explanations from FERC. Staff may use data from its helplines and its
hotline to develop Frequently Asked Questions or other educational
materials for posting on the FERC website.
    Contact information is collected at several intake points including
via email, telephone, fax, and/or webform. The FERC website provides a
number of web-based forms for the public to request assistance related
to specific subjects like landowner and energy company disputes,
reporting possible violations of the Commission's regulations, energy
infrastructure compliance concerns, general participation in Commission
proceeding inquiries, matters that may benefit from alternative dispute
resolution, press and media issues, and Electric Quarterly Reports.

Proposed FERC-1002

    This survey covers outreach under Office of Public Participation,
Office of External Affairs and Electric Quarterly Report
administrators.\4\ FERC proposes to voluntarily collect information on
individual or stakeholder interests to engage with them by providing to
the extent possible targeted information consistent with their
expressed interest. The list of proposed questions is included in
Attachment B of this notice. FERC proposes to voluntarily collect
contact information and information about a participant's subject
matter areas of interest, and to keep email distributions to be used to
inform interested individuals of technical conferences, workshops, user
group meetings, certain proceedings or of press releases or
newsletters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Proposed FERC-1002 covers 3 areas of outreach for customer
engagement (a) from the Office of Public Participation: Subscribe
for Updates From the Office of Public Participation [bond] Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (ferc.gov): FERC Insight Newsletter
[bond] Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (https://www.ferc.gov/office-of-public-participation-subscribe) and (b) for the Electric
Quarterly Report users: Join Our EQR Contact List [bond] Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (ferc.gov) (https://www.ferc.gov/join-our-eqr-contact-list).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This information collection is needed to conduct customer
engagement activities. Customer engagement is needed to further the
Commission's goal of facilitating the public's understanding of FERC's
work and encouraging their participation in FERC matters. This data
will allow FERC to understand which areas of its work are of greater
interest to the public and where additional public outreach and
educational materials or other resources are needed the most.

Estimate of Annual Burden 5
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Burden is defined as the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. For
further explanation of what is included in the information
collection burden, see 5 CFR 1320.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following tables set forth the estimated annual burden and cost
\6\ for the information collections:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Commission staff believes the FERC average wages plus
benefits are a reasonable approximation of the cost for industry and
public respondents. Therefore we are using the 2022 FERC average
cost for wages plus benefits ($91.00 (rounded) per hour or $188,922
(rounded) per year).

                         Estimated Annual Averages for Proposed FERC-1001 and FERC-1002
                                   Estimated Annual Burden Hours for FERC-1001
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Number of                    Average burden
              Line                   Number of     responses per   Total number      hours per     Total annual
                                    respondents     respondent     of responses      response      burden hours
                                             (1)             (2)     (1) x (2) =             (4)     (3) x (4) =
                                                                             (3)                             (5)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Landowner Helpline..............             350               1             350            0.17            59.5
Enforcement Hotline.............             175               1             175            0.25           43.75
ADR Helpline....................              75               1              75             0.5            37.5
OPP Helpline....................             400             1.5             600            0.35             210
Customer Engagement Helpline....           7,300               1           7,300            0.17           1,241
EQR Helpline....................             380             2.5             950            0.75           712.5
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Totals (Rounded)............  ..............  ..............           9,450  ..............            2304
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                       Estimated Annual Cost for FERC-1001
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Average burden
              Line                 Total number      hours per      Loaded cost    Average cost    Total annual
                                   of responses      response        per hour      per response        cost
                                             (3)             (4)             (6)     (4) x (6) =     (3) x (7) =
                                                                                (7)             (8)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Landowner Helpline..............             350            0.17             $91          $15.47       $5,414.50
Enforcement Hotline.............             175            0.25              91           22.75        3,981.25
ADR Helpline....................              75             0.5              91           45.50        3,412.50
OPP Helpline....................             600            0.35              91           31.85       19,110.00
Customer Engagement Helpline....           7,300            0.17              91           15.47      112,931.00
EQR Helpline....................             950            0.75              91           68.25       64,837.50
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Totals (Rounded)............           9,450  ..............  ..............  ..............         209,687
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                   Estimated Annual Burden Hours for FERC-1002
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Number of                    Average burden
         Subscriber type             Number of     responses per   Total number      hours per     Total annual
                                    respondents     respondent     of responses      response      burden hours
                                             (1)             (2)     (1) x (2) =             (4)     (3) x (4) =
                                                                             (3)                             (5)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer Engagement.............           2,000               1           2,000             0.3             600
OPP.............................             100               1             100            0.17              17
EQR.............................             140               1             140            0.17            23.8
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Totals (Rounded)............  ..............  ..............           2,240  ..............             641
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                       Estimated Annual Cost for FERC-1002
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Average burden
         Subscriber type           Total number      hours per      Loaded cost    Average cost    Total annual
                                   of responses      response        per hour      per response        cost
                                             (3)             (4)             (6)     (4) x (6) =     (3) x (7) =
                                                                                (7)             (8)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer Engagement.............            2000             0.3             $91          $27.30      $54,600.00
OPP.............................             100            0.17              91           15.47        1,547.00
EQR.............................             140            0.17              91           15.47        2,165.80
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Totals (Rounded)............           2,240  ..............  ..............  ..............          58,313
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

           Combined Total for Proposed FERC-1001 and FERC-1002
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Estimated hour  Estimated cost
                                              burden          burden
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Annual Combined Total for                2,945        $268,000
 Proposed FERC-1001 and FERC-1002.......
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comments: Comments are invited on: (1) whether the collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the Commission, including whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimates of the
burden and cost of the collections of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the information collections; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of the collections of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.

    Dated: September 1, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-19406 Filed 9-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 125 (Monday, June 29, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 38791]
[FR Doc No: 2020-12864]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2020-0260]

Special Local Regulation; Dutch Shoe Marathon; San Diego, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the Dutch Shoe Marathon special
local regulation on the waters of San Diego Bay, California on July 17,
2020. These special local regulations are necessary to provide for the
safety of the participants, crew, spectators, sponsor vessels, and
general users of the waterway. During the enforcement period, persons
and vessels are prohibited from anchoring, blocking, loitering, or
impeding within this regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port, or his designated representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 100.1101 will be enforced for the
Dutch Shoe Marathon regulated area listed in item 4 in Table 1 to Sec.
100.1101 from noon to 4 p.m. on July 17, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice of enforcement, call or email Lieutenant Briana Biagas,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego, CA; telephone
(619) 278-7656, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the special
local regulations in 33 CFR 100.1101 Table 1, Item 4 of that section
for the Dutch Shoe Marathon in San Diego Bay, CA from noon to 4 p.m. on
July 17, 2020. This action is being taken to provide for the safety of
life on navigable waterways during this event. Our regulation for
marine events within the Eleventh Coast Guard District, Sec.  100.1101,
specifies the location of the regulated area for the Dutch Shoe
Marathon which encompasses the waters of San Diego Bay, CA, from
Shelter Island to Glorietta Bay. Under the provisions of Sec.
100.1101, persons and vessels are prohibited from anchoring, blocking,
loitering, or impeding within this regulated area unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port, or his designated representative. The Coast
Guard may be assisted by other Federal, State, or local law enforcement
agencies in enforcing this regulation.
    In addition to this notice of enforcement in the Federal Register,
the Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with advance
notification of this enforcement period via the Local Notice to
Mariners, Safety Marine Information Broadcast, and local advertising by
the event sponsor.
    If the Captain of the Port Sector San Diego or his designated
representative determines that the regulated area need not be enforced
for the full duration stated on this document, he or she may use a
marine information broadcast or other communications coordinated with
the event sponsor to grant general permission to enter the regulated
area.

    Dated: June 9, 2020.
T.J. Barelli,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2020-12864 Filed 6-26-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: October 19, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 202)]
[Notices]
[Page 61744-61745]
[DOCID:fr19oc06-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER06-1355-000; ER06-1355-001]

Evergreen Windpower, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

October 13, 2006.
    Evergreen Windpower, LLC (Evergreen) filed an application for
market-based rate authority, with an accompanying tariff. The proposed
market-based rate tariff provides for the sale of energy and capacity
at market-based rates. Evergreen also requested waivers of various
Commission regulations. In particular, Evergreen requested that the
Commission grant

blanket approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all future issuances of
securities and assumptions of liability by Evergreen.
    On September 19, 2006, pursuant to delegated authority, the
Director, Division of Tariffs and Market Development--West, granted the
requests for blanket approval under part 34. The Director's order also
stated that the Commission would publish a separate notice in the
Federal Register establishing a period of time for the filing of
protests. Accordingly, any person desiring to be heard or to protest
the blanket approvals of issuances of securities or assumptions of
liability by Evergreen should file a motion to intervene or protest
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214
(2004).
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to
intervene or protest is November 13, 2006.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition by the deadline above,
Evergreen is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or
liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect
of any security of another person; provided that such issuance or
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of
Evergreen, compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably
necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by
continued approvals of Evergreen's issuance of securities or
assumptions of liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the

docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may
be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-17492 Filed 10-18-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 16, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33929-33930]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15068]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP19-485-000]

Notice of Request Under Blanket Authorization: Columbia Gas
Transmission, LLC

    Take notice that on July 2, 2019, Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
(Columbia), 700 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas 77002, filed in Docket
No. CP19-485-000, a Prior Notice Request pursuant to sections 157.205
and 157.216 of the Commission's regulations under the Natural Gas Act
(NGA), and Columbia's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-76-
000, requesting authorization to abandon six injection/withdrawal (I/W)
wells, and associated appurtenances, and abandon in-place six
associated pipelines totaling approximately 1.7 miles at the Lucas and
Weaver Storage Fields located in Ashland County, Ohio. Columbia states
the I/W wells have provided a de minimus contribution to the total
field deliverability and casing replacement would not be cost effective
due to the age of the facilities, all as more fully described in the
application which is on file with the Commission and open to public
inspection. The filing may also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY,
(202) 502-8659.
    Any questions regarding this prior notice should be directed to
Sorana Linder, Director, Modernization & Certificates, Columbia Gas
Transmission, LLC, 700 Louisiana Street, Suite 700, Houston, Texas
77002, by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 60 days after
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to section 157.205 of the regulations
under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to the request. If no protest
is filed within the time allowed therefore, the proposed activity shall
be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time allowed for
filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30
days after the allowed time for filing a protest, the instant request
shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant to
section 7 of the NGA.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the EA for this proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's
public record for this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and
state agencies of the timing for the completion of all necessary
reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations
within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's EA.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list and will be
notified of any meetings associated with the Commission's environmental
review process. Environmental commenters will not be required to serve
copies of filed documents on all other parties. However, the non-party
commenters will not receive copies of all documents filed by other
parties or issued by the Commission and will not have the right to seek
court review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests, and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 3 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426.

    Dated: July 10, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-15068 Filed 7-15-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38420-38422]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15227]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-69810; File No. SR-NYSE-2013-41]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Amending NYSE Rule 1000 To Increase the Price Threshold for Those
Securities Ineligible for Automatic Executions From $1,000.00 or More
to $10,000.00 or More

June 20, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on June 7, 2013, New York Stock Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Rule 1000 to increase the price
threshold for those securities ineligible for automatic executions from
$1,000.00 or more to $10,000.00 or more. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to amend Rule 1000(a)(vi) (``Automatic
Executions'') to increase the price level at which a security would be
considered ``high-priced'' and thus ineligible for automatic execution.
Rule 1000(a)(vi) prohibits automatic executions if the closing price
for a security, or if the security did not trade, the closing bid price
of the security on the Exchange on the immediate previous trading day,
is $1,000 or more. The Exchange is proposing to increase this price
level from $1,000 or more to $10,000 or more.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ As a result of the proposed amendment, six additional
securities would be eligible for automatic execution as of the date
of this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is proposing to make a conforming amendment to Rule
60(d)(iii)(B)(I), which provides that the Exchange keeps Autoquote \4\
active, even if automatic executions are suspended under Rule 1000, if
an order or a cancellation of an order arrives that would not result in
a locked or crossed market in a security priced at $1,000 or more. The
Exchange proposes to increase this price level to $10,000 or more to
conform the provision to the proposed amendment to Rule 1000(a)(vi).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Pursuant to Rule 60(d), the Exchange autoquotes the NYSE's
highest bid or lowest offer to reflect interest in the Book, and
when the highest bid or lowest offer has been traded with in its
entirety, the Exchange will autoquote a new bid or offer reflecting
the total size of orders at the next highest (in the case of a bid)
or lowest (in the case of an offer) price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Securities priced at $1,000 or more are traded manually by the
assigned Designated Market Maker (``DMM''). Rule 610 of Regulation NMS
under the Act prohibits national securities exchanges and national
securities associations from locking or crossing protected
quotations,\5\ and Rule 611 of Regulation NMS prohibits trade-throughs
only of protected quotations.\6\ Rule 600 of Regulation NMS, however,
requires a protected quotation to be automated.\7\ The Exchange's
quotations in high-priced securities, therefore, are not protected
quotations for purposes of Regulation NMS. The proposed rule change
would allow the affected securities to be eligible for automatic
execution and auto-quoting, which would allow the Exchange to protect
its quotations and remain competitive with other market centers. For
the affected securities, the proposal would align the availability of
automatic executions on the Exchange with the availability of such
executions on other exchanges.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 240.610(d)(1)(i).
    \6\ 17 CFR 240.611(a)(1).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.600(b)(57)(iii).
    \8\ The Exchange is not aware of any other exchange that, by
rule, does not issue protected quotations for a stock on a regular
basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is also proposing to make a conforming amendment to
Rule 1000(a)(iv)(C), which sets out value ranges used to determine
liquidity replenishment points (``LRPs''). LRPs are pre-determined
price points that function to moderate volatility in a particular
security, improve price continuity, and foster market quality by
temporarily converting the electronic market to an auction market and
permitting new trading interest to add liquidity.\9\ Pursuant to Rule
60(d)(i), Autoquote is suspended when an LRP is reached.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The Exchange recently amended its rules to phase out the
functionality associated with LRPs to coincide with the
implementation of the Limit Up--Limit Down Plan. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 69295 (April 4, 2013), 78 FR 21457 (April
10, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    LRPs are calculated by adding and subtracting an LRP value to a
security's last sale price. The Exchange sets and disseminates a
specific LRP value from a range of potential values. That range, in
turn, is based upon a security price category (e.g., $5 to $9.99) and
the average daily volume of the security to which the value is being
added. The LRP value chosen within an LRP value range is based on an
examination of trading data. Because the Exchange is increasing the
highest price per share at which automatic execution is available, the
Exchange is making a conforming amendment to the highest security price
category used to determine LRP values from $250 to $1000 to $250 to
$10,000.
2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange. In particular, the Exchange believes that the
proposal is consistent with (i) Section 6(b) of the Act,\10\ in
general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\11\ in
particular, in that it is designed to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities and to remove impediments to and perfect the

mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and
(ii) Section 11A(a)(1) of the Act,\12\ in that it seeks to ensure the
economically efficient execution of securities transactions, fair
competition among brokers and dealers and among exchange markets, and
the practicability of brokers executing investors' orders in the best
market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, the Exchange believes that increasing the dollar
threshold for high-priced securities would expand the eligibility of
orders for automatic executions on the Exchange, thus removing
impediments to and perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system. Further, the Exchange believes the
proposed amendment will foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities because the
securities that will be affected by the amendment are already eligible
for automatic executions on other markets. Thus, the proposal will
align the Exchange's treatment of such securities with that of other
exchanges.
    Additionally, the Exchange believes that the proposal will further
the objectives of Section 11A(a)(1) of the Act because, by increasing
the number of securities eligible for automatic execution, the proposal
will ensure that quotes on the Exchange will be protected from trade-
throughs and not be locked or crossed by other markets. Exchange quotes
in the affected securities will be included in the protected quotations
and increase competition in the market. This increased competition and
requirement that brokers respect Exchange quotes in the affected
securities will increase the ability of brokers to execute investors'
orders in the best market. Further, the proposal will assure the fair
competition among brokers and dealers, among exchange markets, and
between exchange markets and markets other than exchange markets
because the proposal will promote order interaction and ensure that the
Exchange's quotes in the affected securities will not be isolated from
other market centers.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (Reg. NMS Adopting
Release) (quoting H.R. Rep. 94-123, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 50 (1975))
(``[W]hen Congress mandated the establishment of an NMS, it well
stated this basic principle: `Investors must be assured that they
are participants in a system which maximizes the opportunities for
the most willing seller to meet the most willing buyer.' '').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes that
the proposed rule changes will increase competition among execution
venues and encourage additional liquidity. By allowing the affected
securities to be eligible for automatic execution, the Exchange's
quotes in such securities will be considered protected quotes and thus
away markets will be required to route to the Exchange when better
prices are available on the Exchange. The proposal will therefore
increase order interaction and encourage competition in the affected
securities.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not significantly
affect the protection of investors or the public interest, does not
impose any significant burden on competition, and, by its terms, does
not become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed,
or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \14\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day
operative delay. The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day
operative delay will allow the Exchange to align its treatment of the
affected securities with that of other exchanges, threby assuring the
economically efficient execution of securities transactions and
fostering efficiency in the marketplace. Therefore, the Commission
designates the proposal operative upon filing.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \17\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2013-41 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2013-41. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official

business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSE-2013-41 and should be submitted on or before July
17, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-15227 Filed 6-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 94 (Thursday, May 14, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28944-28946]
[FR Doc No: 2020-10376]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0720; FRL-10008-07]

Pesticide Registration Review; Draft Human Health and Ecological
Risk Assessments for Several Pesticides for Several Isothiazolinones;
Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's draft human
health and ecological risk assessments for the registration review of
Methylisothiazolinone/Chloromethylisothiazolinone (MIT/CMIT),
Octhilinone (OIT), Benzisothiazolin-3-one, 3(2H)-Isothiazolone (BIT),
1,2-Benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one,2-butyl (BBIT), and 3(2H)-isothiazolone,
4,5-dichloro-2-octyl- (DCOIT).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 13, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, to the docket identification (ID)
number for the specific pesticide of interest provided in the Table in
Unit IV, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, are available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For pesticide specific information
contact: The Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest
identified in the Table in Unit IV.
    For general questions on the registration review program, contact:
Richard Fehir, Antimicrobials Division (7510P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the Chemical Review Manager identified in the Table in Unit IV.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
    3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.

II. Background

    Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide
registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the
statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform
its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human
health or the environment. As part of the registration review process,
the Agency has completed comprehensive draft human health and/or
ecological risk assessments for all pesticides listed in the Table in
Unit IV. After reviewing comments received during the public comment
period, EPA may issue a revised risk assessment, explain any changes to
the draft risk assessment, and respond to comments and may request
public input on risk mitigation before completing a proposed
registration review decision for the pesticides listed in the Table in
Unit IV. Through this program, EPA is ensuring that each pesticide's
registration is based on current scientific and other knowledge,
including its effects on human health and the environment.

III. Authority

    EPA is conducting its registration review of the chemicals listed
in the Table in Unit IV pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural
Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C.
Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the
registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under
FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only
if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA
section 3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance with
widespread and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must
perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on
the environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the
environment, or a human dietary risk from residues that result from the
use of a pesticide in or on food.

IV. What action is the Agency taking?

    Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58, this notice announces the availability
of EPA's human health and ecological risk assessments for the
pesticides shown in the following table and opens a 60-day public
comment period on the risk assessments.

  Table--Draft Risk Assessments Being Made Available for Public Comment
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Chemical review
 Registration review case name    Docket ID No.     manager and contact
            and No.                                     information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MIT/CMIT Case 3092............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0  Stephen Savage,
                                 605<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703) 347-0345.
OIT Case 2475.................  EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0  Stephen Savage,
                                 160<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703) 347-0345.
BIT Case 3026.................  EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0  Stephen Savage,
                                 159<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703) 347-0345.
BBIT Case 5017................  EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0  Stephen Savage,
                                 736<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703) 347-0345.

DCOIT Case 5023...............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0  Stephen Savage,
                                 403<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703) 347-0345.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.53(c), EPA is providing an opportunity,
through this notice of availability, for interested parties to provide
comments and input concerning the Agency's draft human health and/or
ecological risk assessments for the pesticides listed in the Table in
Unit IV. The Agency will consider all comments received during the
public comment period and make changes, as appropriate, to a draft
human health and/or ecological risk assessment. For specific comments
the Agency is soliciting, see Unit V of this notice. EPA may then issue
a revised risk assessment as part of the proposed interim decision
(PID), explain any changes to the draft risk assessment, and respond to
comments.
    Information submission requirements. Anyone may submit data or
information in response to this document. To be considered during a
pesticide's registration review, the submitted data or information must
meet the following requirements:
     To ensure that EPA will consider data or information
submitted, interested persons must submit the data or information
during the comment period. The Agency may, at its discretion, consider
data or information submitted at a later date.
     The data or information submitted must be presented in a
legible and useable form. For example, an English translation must
accompany any material that is not in English and a written transcript
must accompany any information submitted as an audiographic or
videographic record. Written material may be submitted in paper or
electronic form.
     Submitters must clearly identify the source of any
submitted data or information.
     Submitters may request the Agency to reconsider data or
information that the Agency rejected in a previous review. However,
submitters must explain why they believe the Agency should reconsider
the data or information in the pesticide's registration review.
    As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the registration review docket for
each pesticide case will remain publicly accessible through the
duration of the registration review process; that is, until all actions
required in the final decision on the registration review case have
been completed.

V. Request for Comment

    The EPA specifically requests comment concerning the draft risk
assessments in the following areas:
     The use of in vitro and the artificial neural network-
based defined approach (DA) to determine points of departure used in
the isothiazolinone draft risk assessments instead of using laboratory
animal data to evaluate risks for dermal sensitization.
     The use of a 100-fold uncertainty factor (UF) for the in
vitro points of departure and use of a 10-fold UF for the human study
point of departure selected for the human health dermal assessment.
    Additionally, EPA requests information that may help the Agency
refine the draft risk assessments. For the human health risk
assessment, EPA welcomes the following information:
     For the assessment of inhalation risk, the inhalation
toxicity study for DCOIT has been bridged to assess hazard of both BIT
and BBIT, which do not have inhalation toxicity data. While the no
observed adverse effect level (NOAEC) value from the DCOIT study is
conservative, refinement of the NOAEC through benchmark dosing is not
possible. Due to the 32-fold difference between the NOAEC and lowest
observed adverse effect level (LOAEC) values in the DCOIT study, the
inhalation risks may be overestimated using the conservative, unrefined
endpoint from DCOIT. Additional chemical-specific inhalation toxicity
data using proper dose spacing to conduct benchmark dose analysis would
help to refine the inhalation risk assessments for the
isothiazolinones.
     Residue transfer data are not available at this time for
textiles/clothing, plastics, and carpets and 100% of the application
rate was assumed to transfer to children. Data currently being
collected by the Antimicrobial Exposure Assessment Task Force (AEATF
II) will potentially help to refine the human incidental oral and
dermal exposures.
    For the environmental risk assessments, EPA requests the following
information:
     Degradation studies to show potential degradation in
wastewater treatment facilities.
     More robust usage data on paper production, including
information on how the compounds are used in paper production.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: April 9, 2020.
Anita Pease,
Director, Antimicrobials Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2020-10376 Filed 5-13-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: August 26, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 164)]
[Notices]
[Page 43215]
[DOCID:fr26au09-141]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property
at Walnut Ridge Regional Airport, Walnut Ridge, AR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Request To Release Airport Property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the
release of land at Walnut Ridge Regional Airport under the provisions
of Title 49, U.S.C. Section 47153(c).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 25, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to
the FAA at the following address: Mr. Edward N. Agnew, Manager Federal
Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, Airports Division, Arkansas/
Oklahoma Airports Development Office, ASW-630, 2601 Meacham Boulevard,
Fort Worth, Texas 76137.

    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be
mailed or delivered to The Honorable Michelle Rogers, Mayor of Walnut
Ridge, at the following address: City of Walnut Ridge, 300 West Main
Street, Walnut Ridge, AR 72476.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Paul Burns, Federal Aviation
Administration, Airports Development Office, ASW-630, 2601 Meacham
Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
    The request to release property may be reviewed in person at this
same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the
request to release property at the Pocahontas Municipal Airport.
    On August 10, 2009, the FAA determined that the request to release
property at Walnut Ridge Regional Airport submitted by the City of
Walnut Ridge met the procedural requirements of the Federal Aviation
Regulations, Part 155. The FAA may approve the request, in whole or in
part, no later than September 25, 2009.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    The City of Walnut Ridge requests the release of 10.1 acres of
airport property. The fair market value of this land is $30,000.00. The
land proposed for release will be used by Lauback Trucking, Inc. for a
storage facility. In exchange for this 10.1 acres, the City will
receive a cash payment in the amount of $30,000.00. The City will use
this $30,000.00 (together with $13,000.00 from another airport land
release, resulting in a total of $43,000.00) on a 2010 capital
improvement project to construct a Maintenance Hangar at Walnut Ridge
Regional Airport.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application,
notice and other documents germane to the application in person at the
Walnut Ridge Regional Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on August 14, 2009.
Kelvin L. Solco,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. E9-20320 Filed 8-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


April 13, 2004 Note to Docket OAR 2002 0079 From: Linda Hormes, Workgroup Chair The public hearing scheduled for April 19, 2004 has been cancelled because no party requested to speak by the deadline of COB April 12, 2004.


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 222 (Thursday, November 17, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81098-81099]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27576]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0318; FRL--9952-07-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NSPS for Magnetic Tape Coating Facilities
(Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), ``NSPS for Magnetic Tape Coating
Facilities (40 CFR part 60, subpart SSS) (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No.
1135.12, OMB Control No. 2060-0171), to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). This is a proposed extension of
the ICR, which is currently approved through November 30, 2016. Public
comments were previously requested via the Federal Register (81 FR
26546) on May 3, 2016 during a 60-day comment period. This notice
allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller
description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden
and cost to the public. An Agency may neither conduct nor sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before December 19,
2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID EPA-HQ-OECA-
2013-0318, to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket

Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for
EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: Owners and operators of affected facilities are required
to comply with reporting and record keeping requirements for the
General Provisions (40 CFR part 60, subpart A), as well as for the
specific requirements at 40 CFR part 60, subpart SSS. This includes
submitting initial notification reports, performance tests and periodic
reports and results, and maintaining records of the occurrence and
duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of
an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system
is inoperative. These reports are used by EPA to determine compliance
with these standards.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Magnetic tape coating facilities
constructed or modified after January 22, 1986.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart SSS).
    Estimated number of respondents: 6 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, quarterly and semiannually.
    Total estimated burden: 2,030 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $295,000 (per year), includes which $86,400
in annualized capital/startup and operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an adjustment increase in the
respondent labor hours as currently identified in the OMB Inventory of
Approved Burdens. This increase is not due to any program changes.
Instead, the change in labor hour and cost estimates occurred because
of a change in assumption. This ICR assumes all existing sources will
have to re-familiarize with the regulatory requirements each year.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-27576 Filed 11-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P