[Federal Register: May 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 91)]
[Notices]
[Page 26828-26830]
[DOCID:fr12my10-127]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-62040; File No. SR-CBOE-2010-040]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Adding 75 Options Classes to the Penny Pilot Program

May 5, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 29, 2010, the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    CBOE proposes to amend proposes to amend [sic] its rules relating
to the Penny Pilot Program. The text of the rule proposal is available
on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.org/legal), at the
Exchange's Office of the Secretary, at the Commission's Public
Reference Room and on the Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries,

set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts
of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    CBOE proposes to identify the 75 option classes that will be added
to the Penny Pilot Program on May 3, 2010, consistent with CBOE's rule
filing to extend and expand the Program that was approved on October
22, 2010.\3\ As described in SR-CBOE-2009-76, the Pilot Program will be
expanded by adding 300 option classes, in groups of 75 classes each
quarter on the following dates: November 2, 2009, February 1, 2010, May
3, 2010, and August 2, 2010.\4\ The option classes will be identified
based on national average daily volume in the six calendar months
preceding their addition to the Pilot Program using data compiled by
The Options Clearing Corporation, except that the month immediately
preceding their addition to the Pilot Program will not be utilized for
purposes of the six month analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60864 (October 22,
2009), granting immediate effectiveness to SR-CBOE-2009-76. The
Commission notes that this proposed rule change was submitted
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act and was, therefore,
effective upon filing. The Commission does not approve proposed rule
changes submitted pursuant to this section of the Act.
    \4\ The classes to be added are among the most actively-traded,
multiply-listed option classes that are not currently in the Pilot
Program, excluding option classes with high premiums. An option
class would be designated as ``high premium'' if, at the time of
selection, the underlying security was priced at $200 per share or
above, or the underlying index level was at 200 or above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following 75 option classes will be added to the Pilot Program
beginning on May 3, 2010:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Symbol                   Security name                   Symbol                   Security name
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GFI..........................  Gold Fields Ltd.........  JCP..........................  JC Penney Co Inc.
XLV..........................  Health Care Select        ACL..........................  Alcon IncCo Inc.
                                Sector SPDR Fund.
CIEN.........................  Ciena Corp..............  STP..........................  Suntech Power Holdings
                                                                                Co Ltd.
AMLN.........................  Amylin Pharmaceuticals    TLB..........................  Talbots Inc.
                                Inc.
CTIC.........................  Cell Therapeutics Inc...  SYMC.........................  Symantec Corp.
MDT..........................  Medtronic Inc...........  AMED.........................  Amedisys Inc.
TIVO.........................  TiVo Inc................  TM...........................  Toyota Motor Corp.
MNKD.........................  MannKind Corp...........  HK...........................  Petrohawk Energy Corp.
MDVN.........................  Medivation Inc..........  ENER.........................  Energy Conversion
                                                                                Devices Inc.
BRKB.........................  Berkshire Hathaway Inc..  STT..........................  State Street Corp.
APOL.........................  Apollo Group Inc........  BHP..........................  BHP Billiton Ltd.
BSX..........................  Boston Scientific Corp..  NFLX.........................  NetFlix Inc.
XLY..........................  Consumer Discretionary    LDK..........................  LDK Solar Co Ltd.
                                Sel. Sec. SPDR Fund.
CLF..........................  Cliffs Natural Resources  SPG..........................  Simon Property Group
                                Inc.                                                     Inc.
ZION.........................  Zions Bancorporation....  TIF..........................  Tiffany & Co.
IOC..........................  InterOil Corp...........  BUCY.........................  Bucyrus International
                                                                                Inc.
ITMN.........................  InterMune Inc...........  WAG..........................  Walgreen Co.
GME..........................  GameStop Corp...........  IP...........................  International Paper Co.
XLK..........................  Technology Select Sector  XME..........................  SPDR S&P Metals & Mining
                                SPDR Fund.                                               ETF.
AKS..........................  AK Steel Holding Corp...  KGC..........................  Kinross Gold Corp.
GRMN.........................  Garmin Ltd..............  EP...........................  El Paso Corp.
MRVL.........................  Marvell Technology Group  SEED.........................  Origin Agritech Ltd.
                                Ltd.
XLP..........................  Consumer Staples Select   WIN..........................  Windstream Corp.
                                Sector SPDR Fund.
UNP..........................  Union Pacific Corp......  DHI..........................  DR Horton Inc.
DTV..........................  DIRECTV.................  ADBE.........................  Adobe Systems Inc.
WMB..........................  Williams Cos Inc/The....  PCX..........................  Patriot Coal Corp.
MEE..........................  Massey Energy Co........  SPWRA........................  SunPower Corp.
CELG.........................  Celgene Corp............  LCC..........................  US Airways Group Inc.
GMCR.........................  Green Mountain Coffee     PRU..........................  Prudential Financial
                                Roasters Inc.                                            Inc.
WDC..........................  Western Digital Corp....  LEN..........................  Lennar Corp.
DAL..........................  Delta Air Lines Inc.....  EWT..........................  iShares MSCI Taiwan
                                                                                Index Fund.
FXE..........................  CurrencyShares Euro       KBH..........................  KB Home.
                                Trust.
COST.........................  Costco Wholesale Corp...  CREE.........................  Cree Inc.
MJN..........................  Mead Johnson Nutrition    SIRI.........................  Sirius XM Radio Inc.
                                Co.
ALL..........................  Allstate Corp/The.......  MMR..........................  McMoRan Exploration Co.
SII..........................  Smith International Inc.  CENX.........................  Century Aluminum Co.
RTN..........................  Raytheon Co.............  MT...........................  ArcelorMittal.
DVN..........................  Devon Energy Corp.......                                 ........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The minimum increments for all classes in the Penny Pilot (except
for the QQQQs, IWM and SPY) are: $0.01 for all option series below $3
(including LEAPS), and $0.05 for all option series $3 and above
(including LEAPS). The minimum increment for all option series in QQQQ,
IWM and SPY is $.01.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the rule proposal is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations under the Act applicable to a national securities exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\5\
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) Act \6\ requirements that the rules
of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. In particular, the proposed
rule change allows for an expansion of the Penny Pilot Program for the
benefit of market participants and identifies the option classes to be

added to the Pilot Program in a manner consistent with CBOE's rule
filing SR-CBOE-2009-76 to extend and expand the Pilot Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The proposed rule change is filed for immediate effectiveness
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) \7\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and Rule 19b-4(f)(1) \8\ thereunder as it constitutes a stated
policy, practice, or interpretation with respect to the meaning,
administration, or enforcement of an existing rule. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may
summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2010-040 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2010-040. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at CBOE's principal office and on its Web site
at http://www.cboe.com. All comments received will be posted without
change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information
from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to
make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-
CBOE-2010-040 and should be submitted on or before June 2, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-11257 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Dear Mr. Zeller:

I am writing as an individual consumer to request an extension of the comment period for the Food and Drug Administration's ("FDA") Proposed Rule Deeming Tobacco Products to be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking and Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the "Proposed Rule") published at 79 Fed. Reg. 23,142 and Federal Register No. 2014-09491. On behalf of myself, I am requesting that the comment period for the Proposed Rule be extended by the FDA for an additional 105 days, from its current 75-day period, to 180 days.

The Proposed Rule raises a number of significant issues and questions that are important and relevant to me, as a consumer of products that are proposed for regulation under the Proposed Rule. I believe that these products have saved my life. The Proposed Rule asks about a hundred different questions I might want to respond to. I want to provide my thoughts and comments on many of these issues, but my time to devote to researching and providing thoughtful comments on these important questions is limited. I have already spent many hours researching and dissecting these issues, but they take time. I know that the FDA took many years to even come up with the Proposed Rule, so I do not think it is at all unreasonable to allow the public a mere six months to comment on it. This is our only opportunity, as consumers, to provide our feedback.

I feel very strongly about e-cigarettes as an alternative to combustible cigarettes. Quite simply, I firmly believe that they saved my life. I wish to provide you with my personal story, as well as science- and evidence-based responses to your questions so that you can take my comment into account. I realize that the FDA has the authority under 21 CFR 10.40 to extend this time frame and that the FDA has exercised this authority on numerous occasions in the past. I would therefore ask that you do so here, so that all stakeholders have the opportunity to provide their comments on this proposed regulation.

I appreciate your consideration of my request and am happy to discuss this issue with you further.

Scott Davis
26517 Normandale Dr., #26A
Lake Forest, CA 92630
714-457-7644


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2032-2035]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00548]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2017-1141; Special Conditions No. 25-710-SC]

Special Conditions: Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 5X Airplanes;
Non-Rechargeable Lithium Battery Installations

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for non-rechargeable
lithium battery installations on the Dassault Aviation (Dassault) Model
Falcon 5X airplane. Non-rechargeable lithium batteries are a novel or
unusual design feature when compared to the state of technology
envisioned in the airworthiness standards for transport category
airplanes. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These
special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.

DATES: This action is effective on Dassault Aviation on January 16,
2018. Send your comments by March 2, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2017-1141
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to http://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket website, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA

docket, including the name of the individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association, business, labor union, etc.).
DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement can be found in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-19478).
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nazih Khaouly, Airplane and Flight
Crew Interface Section, AIR-671, Transport Standards Branch, Policy and
Innovation Division, Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW, Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile
425-227-1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Future Requests for Installation of Non-Rechargeable Lithium Batteries

    The FAA anticipates that non-rechargeable lithium batteries will be
installed in most makes and models of transport category airplanes. We
intend to require special conditions for certification projects
involving non-rechargeable lithium battery installations to address
certain safety issues until we can revise the airworthiness
requirements. Applying special conditions to these installations across
the range of transport category airplanes will ensure regulatory
consistency.
    Typically, the FAA issues special conditions after receiving an
application for type certificate approval of a novel or unusual design
feature. However, the FAA has found that the presence of non-
rechargeable lithium batteries in certification projects is not always
immediately identifiable, since the battery itself may not be the focus
of the project. Meanwhile, the inclusion of these batteries has become
virtually ubiquitous on in-production transport category airplanes,
which shows that there will be a need for these special conditions.
Also, delaying the issuance of special conditions until after each
design application is received could lead to costly certification
delays. Therefore, the FAA finds it necessary to issue special
conditions applicable to these battery installations on particular
makes and models of aircraft.
    On April 22, 2016, the FAA published special conditions no. 25-612-
SC in the Federal Register (81 FR 23573) applicable to Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation for the GVI airplane. Those were the first
special conditions the FAA issued for non-rechargeable lithium battery
installations. We explained in that document our decision to make those
special conditions effective one year after publication in the Federal
Register, which is April 22, 2017. In those special conditions, the FAA
stated its intention to apply non-rechargeable lithium battery special
conditions to design changes on other makes and models applied for
after this same date.
    Section 1205 of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 1996 requires the
FAA to consider the extent to which Alaska is not served by
transportation modes other than aviation and to establish appropriate
regulatory distinctions when modifying airworthiness regulations that
affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. In consideration of this
requirement and the overall impact on safety, the FAA does not intend
to require non-rechargeable lithium battery special conditions for
design changes that only replace a 121.5 megahertz (MHz) emergency
locator transmitter (ELT) with a 406 MHz ELT that meets Technical
Standard Order C126b, or later revision, on transport airplanes
operating only in Alaska. This will support our efforts of encouraging
operators in Alaska to upgrade to a 406 MHz ELT. These ELTs provide
significantly improved accuracy for lifesaving services to locate an
accident site in Alaskan terrain. The FAA considers that the safety
benefits from upgrading to a 406 MHz ELT for Alaskan operations will
outweigh the battery fire risk.

Comments Invited

    The substance of these special conditions previously has been
published in the Federal Register for public comment. These special
conditions have been derived without substantive change from those
previously issued. It is unlikely that prior public comment would
result in a significant change from the substance contained herein.
Therefore, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and comment
are unnecessary, and finds that, for the same reason, good cause exists
for adopting these special conditions upon publication in the Federal
Register.
    The FAA is requesting comments to allow interested persons to
submit views that may not have been submitted in response to the prior
opportunities for comment described above. We invite interested people
to take part in this rulemaking by sending written comments, data, or
views. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the
special conditions, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include supporting data.
    We will consider all comments we receive by the closing date for
comments. We may change these special conditions based on the comments
we receive.

Background

    On July 1, 2012, Dassault applied for a type certificate for a new
Model Falcon 5X airplane. The Model Falcon 5X airplane is a twin
engine, transport category airplane with a passenger seating capacity
of 19 and a projected maximum takeoff weight of 66,635 pounds.
    The FAA is issuing these special conditions for non-rechargeable
lithium battery installations on the Dassault Model Falcon 5X airplane.
The current battery requirements in title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 25 are inadequate for addressing an airplane
with non-rechargeable lithium batteries.

Type Certification Basis

    Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, Dassault must show that the
Model Falcon 5X airplane meets the applicable provisions of part 25, as
amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-139.
    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Dassault Model Falcon 5X airplane
because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of Sec.  21.16.
    Special conditions are initially applicable to the airplane model
for which they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model
be amended later to include any other model that incorporates the same
novel or unusual design feature, these special conditions would also
apply to the other model under Sec.  21.101.
    In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Dassault Model Falcon 5X airplane must comply with the
fuel-vent and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the
noise-certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
    The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec.  11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec.  21.17.

Novel or Unusual Design Feature

    The novel or unusual design feature is the installation of non-
rechargeable lithium batteries.
    For the purpose of these special conditions, we refer to a battery
and battery system as a battery. A battery system consists of the
battery and any protective, monitoring, and alerting circuitry or
hardware inside or outside of the battery. It also includes vents
(where necessary) and packaging.

Discussion

    The FAA derived the current regulations governing installation of
batteries in transport category airplanes from Civil Air Regulations
(CAR) 4b.625(d) as part of the recodification of CAR 4b that
established 14 CFR part 25 in February 1965. This recodification
basically reworded the CAR 4b battery requirements, which are currently
in Sec.  25.1353(b)(1) through (4). Non-rechargeable lithium batteries
are novel and unusual with respect to the state of technology
considered when these requirements were codified. These batteries
introduce higher energy levels into airplane systems through new
chemical compositions in various battery cell sizes and construction.
Interconnection of these cells in battery packs introduces failure
modes that require unique design considerations, such as provisions for
thermal management.
    Recent events involving rechargeable and non-rechargeable lithium
batteries prompted the FAA to initiate a broad evaluation of these
energy storage technologies. In January 2013, two independent events
involving rechargeable lithium-ion batteries revealed unanticipated
failure modes. A National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) letter to
the FAA, dated May 22, 2014, which is available at http://www.ntsb.gov,
filename A-14-032-036.pdf, describes these events.
    On July 12, 2013, an event involving a non-rechargeable lithium
battery in an emergency locator transmitter installation demonstrated
unanticipated failure modes. The United Kingdom's Air Accidents
Investigation Branch Bulletin S5/2013 describes this event.
    Some known uses of rechargeable and non-rechargeable lithium
batteries on airplanes include:
    [ssquf] Flight deck and avionics systems such as displays, global
positioning systems, cockpit voice recorders, flight data recorders,
underwater locator beacons, navigation computers, integrated avionics
computers, satellite network and communication systems, communication
management units, and remote-monitor electronic line-replaceable units;
    [ssquf] Cabin safety, entertainment, and communications equipment,
including emergency locator transmitters, life rafts, escape slides,
seatbelt air bags, cabin management systems, Ethernet switches, routers
and media servers, wireless systems, internet and in-flight
entertainment systems, satellite televisions, remotes, and handsets;
    [ssquf] Systems in cargo areas including door controls, sensors,
video surveillance equipment, and security systems.
    Some known potential hazards and failure modes associated with non-
rechargeable lithium batteries are:
    [ssquf] Internal failures: In general, these batteries are
significantly more susceptible to internal failures that can result in
self-sustaining increases in temperature and pressure (i.e., thermal
runaway) than their nickel-cadmium or lead-acid counterparts. The
metallic lithium can ignite, resulting in a self-sustaining fire or
explosion.
    [ssquf] Fast or imbalanced discharging: Fast discharging or an
imbalanced discharge of one cell of a multi-cell battery may create an
overheating condition that results in an uncontrollable venting
condition, which in turn leads to a thermal event or an explosion.
    [ssquf] Flammability: Unlike nickel-cadmium and lead-acid
batteries, lithium batteries use higher energy and current in an
electrochemical system that can be configured to maximize energy
storage of lithium. They also use liquid electrolytes that can be
extremely flammable. The electrolyte, as well as the electrodes, can
serve as a source of fuel for an external fire if the battery casing is
breached.
    Special condition no. 1 of these special conditions requires that
each individual cell within a non-rechargeable lithium battery be
designed to maintain safe temperatures and pressures. Special condition
no. 2 addresses these same issues but for the entire battery. Special
condition no. 2 requires the battery be designed to prevent propagation
of a thermal event, such as self-sustained, uncontrollable increases in
temperature or pressure from one cell to adjacent cells.
    Special conditions nos. 1 and 2 are intended to ensure that the
non-rechargeable lithium battery and its cells are designed to
eliminate the potential for uncontrollable failures. However, a certain
number of failures will occur due to various factors beyond the control
of the battery designer. Therefore, other special conditions are
intended to protect the airplane and its occupants if failure occurs.
    Special conditions 3, 7, and 8 are self-explanatory.
    Special condition no. 4 makes it clear that the flammable fluid
fire protection requirements of Sec.  25.863 apply to non-rechargeable
lithium battery installations. Section 25.863 is applicable to areas of
the airplane that could be exposed to flammable fluid leakage from
airplane systems. Non-rechargeable lithium batteries contain an
electrolyte that is a flammable fluid.
    Special condition no. 5 requires that each non-rechargeable lithium
battery installation not damage surrounding structure or adjacent
systems, equipment, or electrical wiring from corrosive fluids or gases
that may escape in such a way as to cause a major or more severe
failure condition.
    While special condition no. 5 addresses corrosive fluids and gases,
special condition no. 6 addresses heat. Special condition no. 6
requires that each non-rechargeable lithium battery installation have
provisions to prevent any hazardous effect on airplane structure or
systems caused by the maximum amount of heat the battery installation
can generate due to any failure of it or its individual cells. The
means of meeting special conditions nos. 5 and 6 may be the same, but
the requirements are independent and address different hazards.
    These special conditions apply to all non-rechargeable lithium
battery installations in lieu of Sec.  25.1353(b)(1) through (4) at
Amendment 25-123. Sections 25.1353(b)(1) through (4) at Amendment 25-
123 remain in effect for other battery installations.
    These special conditions contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of
safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness
standards.

Applicability

    These special conditions are applicable to the Dassault Model
Falcon 5X airplane. Should Dassault apply at a later date for a change
to the type certificate to include another model incorporating the same
novel or unusual design feature, these special conditions would apply
to that model as well.
    These special conditions are only applicable to design changes
applied for after the effective date.
    These special conditions are not applicable to changes to
previously certified non-rechargeable lithium battery installations
where the only change is either cosmetic or to relocate the
installation to improve the safety of

the airplane and occupants. Previously certified non-rechargeable
lithium battery installations, as used in this paragraph, are those
installations approved for certification projects applied for on or
before the effective date of these special conditions. A cosmetic
change is a change in appearance only, and does not change any function
or safety characteristic of the battery installation. These special
conditions are also not applicable to unchanged, previously certified
non-rechargeable lithium battery installations that are affected by a
change in a manner that improves the safety of its installation. The
FAA determined that these exclusions are in the public interest because
the need to meet all of the special conditions might otherwise deter
these design changes that improve safety.

Conclusion

    This action affects only a certain novel or unusual design feature
on one model of airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and record keeping
requirements.

    The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.

The Special Conditions

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for the Dassault Model Falcon 5X airplane.

Non-Rechargeable Lithium Battery Installations

    In lieu of Sec.  25.1353(b)(1) through (4) at Amendment 25-123,
each non-rechargeable lithium battery installation must:
    1. Be designed to maintain safe cell temperatures and pressures
under all foreseeable operating conditions to prevent fire and
explosion.
    2. Be designed to prevent the occurrence of self-sustaining,
uncontrollable increases in temperature or pressure.
    3. Not emit explosive or toxic gases, either in normal operation or
as a result of its failure, that may accumulate in hazardous quantities
within the airplane.
    4. Meet the requirements of Sec.  25.863.
    5. Not damage surrounding structure or adjacent systems, equipment,
or electrical wiring from corrosive fluids or gases that may escape in
such a way as to cause a major or more severe failure condition.
    6. Have provisions to prevent any hazardous effect on airplane
structure or systems caused by the maximum amount of heat it can
generate due to any failure of it or its individual cells.
    7. Have a failure sensing and warning system to alert the
flightcrew if its failure affects safe operation of the airplane.
    8. Have a means for the flightcrew or maintenance personnel to
determine the battery charge state if the battery's function is
required for safe operation of the airplane.

    Note:  A battery system consists of the battery and any
protective, monitoring, and alerting circuitry or hardware inside or
outside of the battery. It also includes vents (where necessary) and
packaging. For the purpose of these special conditions, a
``battery'' and ``battery system'' are referred to as a battery.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 9, 2018.
Victor Wicklund,
Manager, Transport Standards Branch, Policy and Innovation Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-00548 Filed 1-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 1 (Monday, January 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 94-95]
[FR Doc No: 2015-33008]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2015-D-4048]

Unique Device Identification: Convenience Kits; Draft Guidance
for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of the draft guidance entitled ``Unique Device
Identification: Convenience Kits; Draft Guidance for Industry and Food
and Drug Administration Staff.'' This proposed guidance document is
intended to outline the Agency's current thinking that for purposes of
Unique Device Identification (UDI) labeling and data submission
requirements, the term ``convenience kit'' applies solely to two or
more different medical devices packaged together for the convenience of
the user, where they are intended to remain packaged together and not
replaced, substituted, repackaged, sterilized, or otherwise processed
or modified before the devices are used by an end user. This draft
guidance is not final nor is it in effect at this time. When finalized,
this guidance document will constitute a change in policy.

DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment of this
draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by April 4, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to http://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2015-D-4048 for ``Unique Device Identification: Convenience Kits;
Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff.''
Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets Management between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states

``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
    An electronic copy of the guidance document is available for
download from the Internet. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for information on electronic access to the guidance. Submit written
requests for a single hard copy of the draft guidance document entitled
``Unique Device Identification: Convenience Kits; Draft Guidance for
Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff'' to the Office of the
Center Director, Guidance and Policy Development, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5431, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing
your request.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: UDI Regulatory Policy Support, Center
for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3303, Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Section 226 of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of
2007 and section 614 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the
FD&C Act) to add and amend section 519(f) (21 U.S.C. 360i(f)), which
directs FDA to publish regulations establishing a unique device
identification system for medical devices. The UDI system final rule
was published on September 24, 2013 (78 FR 58786) (the UDI Rule).
    The overarching objective of the UDI Rule, as required by section
519(f) of the FD&C Act, is to provide a system to adequately identify
medical devices through distribution and use. We interpret this to mean
that the form of a UDI should, in conformity with 21 CFR 801.40, be
available to identify a device in both easily readable plain-text and
in a form that can be entered into an electronic patient record or
other computer system via an automated process when the device is used
by an end user.
    The term ``convenience kit'' is defined at 21 CFR 801.3 as ``two or
more different medical devices packaged together for the convenience of
the user.'' Under 21 CFR 801.30(a)(11), individual devices packaged
within a convenience kit are excepted from the UDI labeling
requirements, provided the UDI is on the label of the immediate
container of the convenience kit. The preamble to the UDI Rule
expressed our thinking at the time that medical procedure kits,
including orthopedic procedure kits, are convenience kits.
    Since the publication of the UDI Rule, we have determined that
interpreting the term ``convenience kit'' at Sec.  801.3 to include
implantable devices and instruments that are provided by the labeler in
sets or trays as non-sterile and repeatedly reconfigured and sterilized
(or cleaned and sterilized) prior to use would be inconsistent with the
purpose of the exceptions at Sec.  801.30 and the UDI Rule generally.
In this draft guidance, FDA proposes to interpret the term
``convenience kit'' at Sec.  801.3 as applying solely to two or more
different medical devices packaged together for the convenience of the
user where they are intended to remain packaged together and not
replaced, substituted, repackaged, sterilized, or otherwise processed
or modified before the devices are used by an end user.

II. Significance of Guidance

    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized will represent the Agency's current thinking on Unique Device
Identification for Convenience Kits. It does not establish any rights
for any person is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable
statutes and regulations.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons interested in obtaining a copy of the draft guidance may do
so by downloading an electronic copy from the Internet. A search
capability for all Center for Devices and Radiological Health guidance
documents is available at http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/default.htm. Guidance
documents are also available at http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/default.htm or http://www.regulations.gov. Persons unable to download
an electronic copy of ``Unique Device Identification: Convenience Kits;
Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff''
may send an email request to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>to receive an
electronic copy of the document. Please use the document number 1500010
to identify the guidance you are requesting.

IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
collections of information in part 801, subpart B have been approved
under OMB control number 0910-0720.

    Dated: December 28, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-33008 Filed 12-31-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70070-70071]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28739]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline And Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; Notice of Application for
Special Permits

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: List of Applications for Special Permits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations (49 CFR Part 107,
Subpart B), notice is hereby given that the Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety has received the application described herein. Each
mode of transportation for which a particular special permit is
requested is indicated by a number in the ``Nature of Application''
portion of the table below as follows: 1--Motor vehicle, 2--Rail
freight, 3--Cargo vessel, 4--Cargo aircraft only, 5--Passenger-carrying
aircraft.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 16, 2010.
    Address Comments To: Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Washington, DC 20590.
    Comments should refer to the application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of comments is desired, include
a self-addressed stamped postcard showing the special permit number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the applications are
available for inspection in the Records Center, East Building, PHH-30,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E., Washington DC or at http://regulations.gov.
    This notice of receipt of applications for special permit is
published in accordance with Part 107 of the Federal hazardous
materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 9, 2010.
Donald Burger,
Chief, Special Permits and Approvals Branch.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Regulation(s)     Nature of special permits
    Application No.        Docket No.           Applicant              affected                 thereof
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15165-N...............  ................  Kidde Aerospace &      49 CFR 173.302,       To authorize the
                                           Defense Wilson, NC.    173.302a, and         Aerospace 173.302a, and
                                                                  178.47.               manufacture, marking, &
                                                                                Defense 178.47 sale, and
                                                                                use of non-DOT WILSON,
                                                                                NC specification
                                                                                cylinders similar to DOT
                                                                                4DS cylinders for use as
                                                                                fire extinguishers
                                                                                aboard aircraft. (modes
                                                                                1, 2, 3, 4, 5).
15166-N...............  ................  Papillon Airways,      49 CFR 172.101        To authorize the
                                           Inc. Grand Canyon,     Column 8(c),          transportation in
                                           AZ.                    173.241 and 173.242.  commerce of gasoline in
                                                                                non-Dot specification
                                                                                containers when
                                                                                transported in sling
                                                                                load operations. (mode
                                                                                4).
15179-N...............  ................  Digital Wave           49 CFR 180.209......  To authorize the
                                           Corporation                                  transportation in
                                           Englewood, CO.                               commerce of certain
                                                                                hazardous materials in
                                                                                DOT Specification 3AL
                                                                                cylinders manufactured
                                                                                from aluminum alloy 6061-
                                                                                T6 that are requalified
                                                                                every ten years rather
                                                                                than every five years
                                                                                using 100% ultrasonic
                                                                                examination. (modes 1,
                                                                                2, 3, 4, 5).

15180-N...............  ................  Roche Diagnostics      49 CFR 173.242(e)(1)  To authorize the
                                           Corporation                                  transportation in
                                           Indianapolis, IN.                            commerce of certain PG
                                                                                II corrosive liquids in
                                                                                UN 50G fiberboard large
                                                                                packagings by motor
                                                                                vehicle. (mode 1).
15181-N...............  ................  JBI Helicopter.......  49 CFR 172.101        To authorize the
                                                                  Column (9B),          transportation in
                                                                  172.204(c)(3),        commerce of certain
                                                                  173.27(b)(2),         hazardous materials by
                                                                  175.30(a)(1),         external load on
                                                                  172.200, 172.300      helicopter in remote
                                                                  and 172.400.          areas of the US without
                                                                                being subject to hazard
                                                                                communication
                                                                                requirements and
                                                                                quantity limitations
                                                                                where no other means of
                                                                                transportation is
                                                                                available. (mode 4).
15182-N...............  ................  BASF Corporation       49 CFR 73.4a(b).....  To authorize the
                                           Florham Park, NJ.                            transportation in
                                                                                commerce of an Oxidizing
                                                                                solid, water-reactive as
                                                                                an excepted quantity.
                                                                                (modes 1, 2, 4).
15183-N...............  ................  Jack Oldham Oil Co.    49 CFR 173.315(m)...  To authorize the
                                           Inc.                                         transportation in
                                                                                commerce of anhydrous
                                                                                ammonia in non-DOT
                                                                                specification cargo
                                                                                tanks (nurse tanks) when
                                                                                transported to
                                                                                refineries for purposes
                                                                                of pollution control by
                                                                                motor vehicle within a
                                                                                50 mile radius. (mode
                                                                                1).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2010-28739 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4909-60-M


MEMORANDUM  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1

DATE:		July 30, 2015

TO:		Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id:
OAR–2013-0602

FROM:		Lora Strine, EPA

SUBJECT:	May 26, 2015 Meeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for
Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A phone call was held between EPA and Patrick Cummins, CNEE on May 26,
2015 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants.
The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2,
2014.

ATTENDEES

Center for New Energy Economy

Patrick Cummins

Jeff Lyng

US EPA

Implementation Workgroup

Godfrey, Janice; Strine, Lora; Boswell, Colin; Burns, Ward; Cain,
Alexis; Culligan, Kevin; Dalcher, Debra; Donaldson, Guy; Drake, Robert;
Dressler, Jason; Farris, Laura; Fellner, Christian; Fulton, Abby;
Gonzalez, Larry; Gordon, Michael; Haber, Matt; Hackel, Angela; Hoffman,
Howard; Hutson, Nick; Johnson, Mary; Johnson, Terry; Kakade, Seema;
Ketcham-Colwill, Jim; Lau, Gavin; Lawrence, Rob; Lee, Anita; Linn,
Emily; Lloyd, David; McConnell, Robert; Miller, Julia; Mitchell, Ken;
Mulholland, Denise; Murray, Beth; Narvaez, Madonna; Newman, Erin;
Orlando, Danny; Ortega, Kellie; Patel, Ketan; Rosenberg, Julie;
Santiago, Juan; Saracino, Ray; Sherry, Christopher; Solomon, David;
Srivastava, Ravi; Steib, Clovis; Stevens, Gabrielle; Torres, Elineth;
Wieber, Kirk; Williamson, Timothy; Wong, Shutsu; Zenick, Elliott;
Moskal, John; Elman, Barry; Conroy, David; Greene, Cynthia; Shatas,
Angie; Raymond Forde; Gardella, Anthony; Mangels, Karl; Mark, Jeremy;
Victor, Meg; Daly, Carl; Aisling, Kathleen; Swanson, Nicholas; Wortman,
Eric; Hansen, Mark; Olszewski, Joshua; Thomas, Carrie; Vijayan, Abi;
Argentieri, Sabrina; Evans, DavidA; Marten, Alex; Sheriff, Glenn


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 62 (Friday, March 30, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13743-13744]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06409]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Technical Conference

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Docket No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local Transmission Planning Within the         AD18-12-000
 California Independent System Operator
 Corporation.
California Public Utilities Commission,        EL17-45-000
 Northern California Power Agency, City and
 County of San Francisco, State Water
 Contractors, Transmission Agency of Northern
 California v. Pacific Gas and Electric
 Company.
Southern California Edison Company...........  ER18-370-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By order issued concurrently with this notice,\1\ the Commission
directed staff to convene a technical conference regarding: (1) Local
transmission planning within the California Independent System Operator
Corporation (CAISO) (new Docket No. AD18-12-000); (2) Docket No. ER18-
370-000 related to Southern California Edison Company's (SoCal Edison)
filing of revisions to its transmission owner tariff detailing a new
annual Transmission Maintenance and Compliance Review process; and (3)
a complaint filed in Docket No. EL17-45-000 \2\ against Pacific Gas and
Electric Company (PG&E), regarding PG&E's compliance with the
transmission planning principles of Order No. 890.\3\ The technical
conference will explore the processes used by participating
transmission owners (PTOs) in CAISO to determine which transmission-
related maintenance and compliance activities, including, but not
limited to, transmission-related capital additions, will be subject to
the CAISO Transmission Planning Process (TPP). The technical conference
will take place on May 1, 2018 beginning at approximately 9:00 a.m. and
ending at approximately 4:00 p.m. The conference will be held at the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426. All interested persons are invited to participate in the
conference. Commission members may participate in the conference.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Southern California Edison Co., 162 FERC ] 61,264 (2018).
    \2\ The complainants are the California Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC), Northern California Power Agency, the City and
County of San Francisco, State Water Contractors, and the
Transmission Agency of Northern California.
    \3\ Preventing Undue Discrimination and Preference in
Transmission Service, Order No. 890, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,241,
order on reh'g, Order No. 890-A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,261
(2007), order on reh'g, Order No. 890-B, 123 FERC ] 61,299 (2008),
order on reh'g, Order No. 890-C, 126 FERC ] 61,228, order on
clarification, Order No. 890-D, 129 FERC ] 61,126 (2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In Order No. 890, the Commission required all public utility
transmission providers, including regional transmission organizations
(RTOs) and independent system operators (ISOs), to revise their open
access transmission tariffs (OATTs) to incorporate a transmission
planning process that satisfied nine transmission planning principles
in order to limit the opportunities for undue discrimination and
anticompetitive conduct in the provision of transmission service.\4\ In

Order No. 890-A, the Commission noted that each RTO and ISO may fulfill
its obligations under Order No. 890 by delegating certain planning
activities to, or otherwise relying on, its transmission owning
members, provided that the rights and responsibilities of all parties
are clearly stated in the RTO/ISO OATT.\5\ The Commission also
explained that, in many cases, RTO/ISO transmission planning processes
may focus principally on regional problems and solutions, while local
planning issues may be addressed by individual transmission owners.
Noting that these local planning issues may be critically important to
transmission customers, the Commission stated that transmission owners
must, to the extent that they perform transmission planning within an
RTO or ISO, comply with Order No. 890 as well.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Order No. 890, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,241 at PP 426, 435;
see Order No. 890-A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,261 at P 171. These
transmission planning principles are: (1) Coordination; (2)
openness; (3) transparency; (4) information exchange; (5)
comparability; (6) dispute resolution; (7) regional participation;
(8) economic planning studies; and (9) cost allocation for new
projects.
    \5\ Order No. 890-A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,261 at P 175.
    \6\ Order No. 890, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,241 at P 440.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In a series of orders issued between 2008 and 2010, the Commission
accepted CAISO's TPP as consistent with the requirements of Order No.
890.\7\ As is relevant here, in an order issued on May 21, 2009, the
Commission found that ``the local planning activities conducted by the
participating transmission owners [in CAISO] are reasonable and the
process, as set forth in the [CAISO] tariff and business practice
manual, is transparent.'' \8\ However, more recently, a number of
interested parties have raised concerns regarding the lack of
opportunity for stakeholder review of transmission-related maintenance
and compliance activities, including, but not limited to, certain
transmission-related capital additions, which CAISO PTOs do not submit
to CAISO's TPP.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Cal. Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 123 FERC ] 61,283
(2008), order denying reh'g and on compliance filing, 127 FERC ]
61,172 (2009), order on compliance filing, 130 FERC ] 61,048 (2010).
    \8\ Cal. Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 127 FERC ] 61,172 at P 118.
    \9\ See, e.g., Cal. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, et al. v. Pacific Gas &
Elec. Co., Complaint, Docket No. EL17-45-000 (filed Feb. 2, 2017)
(asserting that Pacific Gas & Electric Co. is in violation of Order
No. 890 because it conducts more than 80 percent of its transmission
planning on an internal basis without stakeholder review); Cal. Pub.
Utils. Comm'n Dec. 22, 2017 Protest, Docket No. ER18-370-000
(protesting Southern California Edison Co.'s filing of an amendment
to its Transmission Owner Tariff to create an annual Transmission
Maintenance and Compliance Review process on the basis that the
proposed process does not meet the requirements of Order No. 890).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In an order issued concurrently with this notice in Docket No.
ER18-370-000, the Commission finds that protesters in that proceeding
raise important questions that relate to the processes by which all
CAISO PTOs determine which transmission-related maintenance and
compliance activities, including, but not limited to, transmission-
related capital additions, must be submitted to CAISO's TPP. In that
order, the Commission directs Commission staff to convene a technical
conference to explore these issues.
    The specific issues to be discussed include, but are not limited
to: (1) The types of transmission-related maintenance and compliance
activities, including, but not limited to, certain transmission-related
capital additions, that the PTOs submit for review through CAISO's TPP;
(2) the process by which PTOs determine which transmission-related
maintenance and compliance activities must be considered through
CAISO's TPP; and (3) the types of transmission-related maintenance and
compliance activities and the process that the CAISO PTOs undertake
independent of CAISO's TPP. As part of this discussion, staff seeks to
understand the differences in the processes used by each individual PTO
in CAISO, the concerns of interested parties regarding these processes,
and any role that CAISO may play in these processes. Staff emphasizes
that, while Docket Nos. ER18-370-000 and EL17-45-000 specifically
relate to Southern California Edison Company and PG&E, respectively,
this technical conference will explore the transmission planning
processes of all PTOs in CAISO and of CAISO itself.
    A supplemental notice(s) will be issued prior to the technical
conference with further details regarding the agenda and organization
of the technical conference.
    All interested persons may attend the conference, and registration
is not required. However, in-person attendees are encouraged to
register on-line at https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/registration/05-01-18-form.asp. This event will NOT be webcast. However, for those who
cannot attend in person we will provide a listen-only telephone line,
if requested. Those wishing this service should register at the link
provided and specify the telephone line option.
    The technical conference will be transcribed, and transcripts will
be available immediately for a fee from Ace Reporting Company (202)
347-3700).
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please
send an email to [email protected] or call toll free (866) 208-
3372 (voice) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a fax to<PHONE_NUMBER>
with the required accommodations.
    For further information, please contact individuals identified for
each topic:
    Technical Information: Laura Switzer, Office of Energy Markets
Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER>, [email protected].
    Legal Information for Docket Nos. AD18-12-000 and EL17-45-000:
Linda Kizuka, Office of the General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].
    Legal Information for Docket Nos. AD18-12-000 and ER18-370-000:
Susanna Ehrlich, Office of the General Counsel, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, (202)
502-6260, [email protected].
    Logistical Information: Sarah McKinley, Office of External Affairs,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER>, [email protected].

    Dated: March 23, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-06409 Filed 3-29-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10615-10616]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4030]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2011-0054; Notice 2]

Cooper Tire & Rubber Tire Company, Grant of Petition for Decision
of Inconsequential Noncompliance

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Grant of Petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Cooper Tire & Rubber Tire Company, (Cooper) \1\, has
determined that approximately 6,964 passenger car replacement tires
manufactured between January 23, 2011 and March 26, 2011, do not fully
comply with paragraph S5.5(f) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 139, New Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light Vehicles. Cooper
has filed an appropriate report dated March 31, 2011, pursuant to 49
CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Cooper Tire & Rubber Tire Company (Cooper) is a replacement
equipment manufacturer incorporated in the state of Delaware.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see implementing rule
at 49 CFR part 556), Cooper has petitioned for an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the
basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety.
    Notice of receipt of Cooper's petition was published, with a 30-day
public comment period, on May 17, 2011, in the Federal Register (76 FR
28502). No comments were received. To view the petition and all
supporting documents log onto the Federal Docket Management System Web
site at: http://www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online search
instructions to locate docket number ``NHTSA-2011-0054.''
    For further information on this decision, contact Mr. George
Gillespie, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Affected are approximately 6,964 size LT285/75R16 Cooper brand
Discoverer S/T MAXX model passenger car replacement tires manufactured
between January 23, 2011 and March 26, 2011, at Cooper's plant located
in Texarkana, Arkansas.
    Cooper explains that the noncompliance is that, due to a mold
labeling error, the sidewall marking on the reference side of the
tires, required by paragraph S5.5(f), incorrectly describes the actual
number of plies in the tread area of the tires. Specifically, the tires
in question were inadvertently manufactured with ``TREAD 1 PLY NYLON +
2 PLY STEEL + 3 PLY POLYESTER; SIDEWALL 3 PLY POLYESTER.'' The labeling
should have been ``TREAD 2 PLY NYLON + 2 PLY STEEL + 3 PLY POLYESTER;
SIDEWALL 3 PLY POLYESTER.''
    Cooper also explains that while the non-compliant tires are
mislabeled, the tires do in fact have 2 Nylon tread plies and meet or
exceed all other applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards.
    Cooper reported that this noncompliance was discovered during a
review of the specified stamping requirements and visual inspection of
tire stamping.
    Cooper argues that this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor
vehicle safety because the noncompliant sidewall marking does not
create an unsafe condition and all other labeling requirements have
been met.

    Cooper points out that NHTSA has previously granted similar
petitions for non-compliances in sidewall marking.
    In summation, Cooper believes that the described noncompliance of
its tires to meet the requirements of FMVSS No. 139 is inconsequential
to motor vehicle safety, and that its petition, to exempt from
providing recall notification of noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C.
30118 and remedying the recall noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C.
30120 should be granted.
    NHTSA Decision: The agency agrees with Cooper that the
noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. The agency
believes that the true measure of inconsequentiality to motor vehicle
safety in this case is that there is no effect of the noncompliances on
the operational safety of the vehicles on which these tires are
mounted. The safety of people working in the tire retread, repair, and
recycling industries must also be considered. Although tire
construction affects the strength and durability, neither the agency
nor the tire industry provides information relating tire strength and
durability to the number of plies and types of ply cord material in the
tread and sidewall.
    Therefore, tire dealers and customers should consider the tire
construction information along with other information such as load
capacity, maximum inflation pressure, and tread wear, temperature, and
traction ratings, to assess performance capabilities of various tires.
In the agency's judgment, the incorrect labeling of the tire
construction information will have an inconsequential effect on motor
vehicle safety because most consumers do not base tire purchases or
vehicle operation parameters on the ply material in a tire.
    The agency also believes the noncompliance will have no measurable
effect on the safety of the tire retread, repair, and recycling
industries. The use of steel cord construction in the sidewall and
tread is the primary safety concern of these industries. In this case,
since the tire sidewalls do not contain steel plies, this potential
safety concern does not exist.
    NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this decision
only applies to the 6,964 \2\ tires that Cooper no longer controlled at
the time that it determined that a noncompliance existed in the subject
tires.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Cooper's petition, which was filed under 49 CFR part 556,
requests an agency decision to exempt Cooper as a manufacturer from
the notification and recall responsibilities of 49 CFR part 573 for
the affected tires. However, a decision on this petition cannot
relieve distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale,
offer for sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into
interstate commerce of the noncompliant tires under their control
after Cooper notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has decided that Cooper
has met its burden of persuasion that the subject FMVSS No. 139
labeling noncompliances are inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Accordingly, Cooper's petition is granted and the petitioner is
exempted from the obligation of providing notification of, and a remedy
for, the subject noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

    Issued on: February 15, 2012.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2012-4030 Filed 2-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 219 (Tuesday, November 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56349-56350]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24608]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-2970]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Surveys and
Interviews With Investigational New Drug Sponsors To Assess Current
Communication Practices With Food and Drug Administration Review Staff
Under the Sixth Authorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by
December 13, 2018.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or emailed to [email protected]. All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-NEW and
title ``Surveys and Interviews with Investigational New Drug Sponsors
to Assess Current Communication Practices with Food and Drug
Administration Review Staff Under the Sixth Authorization of the
Prescription Drug User Fee Act.'' Also include the FDA docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ila S. Mizrachi, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.

Surveys and Interviews With Investigational New Drug (IND) Sponsors To
Assess Current Communication Practices With Food and Drug
Administration Review Staff Under the Sixth Authorization of the
Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA VI)

OMB Control Number 0910-NEW

    In Fiscal Year 2017, FDA published guidance on communications
between FDA review staff and drug sponsors during the IND phase of drug
development. As part of PDUFA VI, FDA committed to a third-party
assessment of current IND-phase communication practices, which should
reflect this guidance. The contractor for the assessment of IND
communication practices is Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG).
    Therefore, in accordance with the PDUFA VI Commitment Letter, FDA
proposes to have ERG conduct surveys and interviews with sponsors of up
to 150 active commercial INDs as follows:
     For each formal meeting between FDA review staff and
active commercial IND sponsors during the assessment period, send a
survey to the sponsor to solicit specific feedback about communication
practices employed for that meeting. For the purpose of this
assessment, formal meetings are Type A, B, B (End of Phase), and C
meetings during the IND phase of drug development.
     For each active commercial IND in the assessment, conduct
an interview with the sponsor to obtain broader feedback about all
communications with FDA review staff during the study period, including
telephone and email interactions in addition to meetings.
    The purpose of this information collection is to understand active
commercial IND sponsor perspectives on communication during drug
development with a focus on what is working well, ongoing challenges
and pain points, lessons learned, and opportunities for improvement.
The contractor will develop anonymized aggregated summaries of survey
and interview responses, analyze this information to identify common
themes, consider these results along with IND data and feedback from
FDA review staff to develop a set of findings and recommendations, and
prepare a report to be published on FDA's website. The contractor will
keep information collected private; ERG will not disclose personally
identifying information to FDA or any other party.
    In the Federal Register of August 16, 2018 (83 FR 40771), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public

comment on the proposed collection of information. No comments were
received.
    The number of commercial INDs with activity is approximately 4,000
per year. ERG will interview 1 to 3 sponsor representatives at a time
for up to 150 INDs during the annual assessment period.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                                     Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Number of
              Type of respondent                  Number of     responses per   Total annual          Average burden  per response          Total hours
                                                 respondents     respondent       responses
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IND sponsors: Surveys........................             150               1             150  0.17 (10 minutes)........................           25.50
IND sponsors: Interviews.....................             450               1             450  1.5......................................             675
                                              ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total....................................  ..............  ..............  ..............  .........................................          700.50
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    FDA estimates that it will take each IND sponsor a maximum of 10
minutes to complete a survey. Up to 150 respondents will take part in
the survey, yielding a maximum burden of 25.5 hours. FDA estimates that
it will take each IND sponsor up to 90 minutes to respond to requests
for interviews and participate in interviews. Up to 450 respondents
will take part in interviews, yielding a maximum burden of 675 hours.
FDA's burden estimates are based on experience with information
collections for similar types of PDUFA-related assessments.

    Dated: November 5, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-24608 Filed 11-9-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: May 19, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 96)]
[Notices]
[Page 28004]
[DOCID:fr19my10-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM10-13-000]

Credit Reforms in Organized Wholesale Electric Markets; Notice
Establishing Date for Comments

May 12, 2010.
    On May 11, 2010, Commission staff convened a technical conference
related to the Commission's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Credit
Reforms in Organized Wholesale Electric Markets.\1\ Specifically, the
technical conference addressed the proposal in the Credit Reforms NOPR
regarding whether Independent System Operators/Regional Transmission
Operators should adopt tariff revisions to clarify their status as a
counterparty to transactions in their markets
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Credit Reforms in Organized Wholesale Electric Markets, 130
FERC ] 61,055 (2010) (Credit Reforms NOPR).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Entities wishing to submit further, written comments regarding the
counterparty proposal discussed at the technical conference should
submit their comments in this docket on or before June 8, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-11908 Filed 5-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 45980]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17633]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL21-91-000]

PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice of Institution of Section 206
Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On August 10, 2021, the Commission issued an order in Docket No.
EL21-91-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16
U.S.C. 824e, instituting an investigation into whether the existing
rates for generating units providing Black Start Service based on a
federal corporate income tax rate that pre-dates the Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act of 2017, remain just and reasonable. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.,
176 FERC ] 61,080 (2021).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL21-91-000, established
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication
of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL21-91-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, in
accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214 (2020), within 21 days of the date of
issuance of the order.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system on
the Commission's home page (http://www.ferc.gov) using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 11, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-17633 Filed 8-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 199)]
[Notices]
[Page 63466]
[DOCID:fr15oc10-63]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-39-000]

Flat Water Wind Farm, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

October 7, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Flat Water Wind Farm, LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is October 27, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25958 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P