[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1142-1144]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00194]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-441-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cash Out Surcharge True-Up
Filing to be effective 2/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5055.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-442-000.
    Applicants: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Annual Accounting Report on 12-30-
21 to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5067.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-443-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Gas Storage Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Add New Services at Market
Based Rates to be effective 2/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5074.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-444-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreements
Filing (Hartree and ETC Marketing) to be effective 1/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5077.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-445-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Update (SoCal Jan-Mar 2022) to be effective 1/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5078.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-446-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmts
(Atlanta Gas 8438 to various eff 1-1-2022) to be effective 1/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5089.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-447-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmts
(Marathon releases eff 1-1-2022) to be effective 1/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5090.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-448-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt
(Constellation re-release to Exelon eff 1-1-2022) to be effective 1/1/
2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5096.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-449-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Penalty Revenue Crediting Report
2021 to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5138.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-450-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Penalty Revenue Crediting Report
2021 to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5140.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-451-000.
    Applicants: Crossroads Pipeline Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Penalty Revenue Crediting Report
2021 to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5141.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-452-000.
    Applicants: Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Penalty Revenue Crediting Report
2021 to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5144.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-453-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: ANR--Concord 136933 &
Freepoint 136932 Negotiated Rate Agreement to be effective 1/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5146.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-454-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: REX 2021-12-30 Negotiated Rate
Agreement Amendment to be effective 1/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5156.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-455-000.
    Applicants: Tallgrass Interstate Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: TIGT 2021-12-30 Definition and
Service Request Revisions to be effective 2/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5160.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-456-000.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: TPC 2021-12-30 Definition and
Service Request Revisions to be effective 2/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5161.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-457-000.
    Applicants: Roaring Fork Interstate Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Baseline Tariff in Compliance with
Docket Nos. CP21-462 to be effective 3/31/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5167.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-458-000.
    Applicants: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 2021 Add Line Section 32 for
NBE to be effective 2/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5174.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-459-000.
    Applicants: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2021 Compliance Filing for North
Bakken Expansion to be effective 2/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5178.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-460-000.
    Applicants: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 2021 North Bakken Service
Agreements to be effective 2/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5182.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-461-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Cherokee
AGL--Replacement Shippers--Jan 2022 to be effective 1/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5220.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-462-000.
    Applicants: Double E Pipeline, LLC.

    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate & Non-
Conforming Agreement--Marathon Permian to be effective 1/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5225.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-463-000.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 20211230 Negotiated Rate to be
effective 1/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5250.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-464-000.
    Applicants: Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Vol. 2--Negotiated Rate
Agreements--Scout Energy Group and Concord Energy to be effective 1/1/
2022.
    Filed Date: 1/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20220103-5004.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/18/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-465-000.
    Applicants: LA Storage, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Filing of Negotiated Rate,
Conforming IW Agreements 1.1.22 to be effective 1/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 1/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20220103-5005.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/18/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-466-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: TETLP EPC FEB 2022 FILING to
be effective 2/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 1/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20220103-5006.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/18/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-472-000.
    Applicants: Interstate Gas Supply, Inc., Dominion Energy Solutions,
Inc.
    Description: Joint Petition for Limited Waiver of Capacity Release
Regulations, et al. of Interstate Gas Supply, Inc., et al.
    Filed Date: 1/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20220103-5212.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/18/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP20-1241-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Cove Point LNG, LP.
    Description: Refund Report: Cove Point LNG, LP submits tariff
filing per 154.501: Cove Point--PVIC Report of Refunds to be effective
N/A.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5061.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-454-001.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: REX 2020-01-03 RP22-454 Amendment to
be effective 1/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 1/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20220103-5075.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/18/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-457-001.
    Applicants: Roaring Fork Interstate Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Amendment to Statement of
Negotiated Rates to be effective 3/31/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20211230-5187.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/11/22.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: January 4, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-00194 Filed 1-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 45598]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18736]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ12-11-000]

Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on June 15, 2012, Oncor Electric Delivery Company
LLC submitted its tariff filing per 35.28(e): Baseline Tariff Filing to
be effective March 2, 2011.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 31, 2012.

    Dated: July 24, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-18736 Filed 7-31-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 908-910]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31888]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket Number NHTSA-2016-0134]

Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Request for public comment on a proposed collection of
information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and

reinstatement of previously approved collections.
    This document describes one collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 6, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by DOT Docket No. NHTSA-
2016-0134] by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Telephone: 1-800-647-
5527.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this proposed collection of information. Note that
all comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit http://DocketInfo.dot.gov.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the
online instructions for accessing the dockets. Alternately, you may
visit in person the Docket Management Facility at the street address
listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance (NEF-230), National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, West Building--4th Floor--Room W45-205, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Sachs' telephone number is (202)
366-3151. Please identify the relevant collection of information by
referring to its OMB Control Number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must first publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulation (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
    i. Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
    ii. The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
    iii. How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected;
    iv. How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic
submission of responses.
    In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following proposed collection of information:

    Title: 49 CFR part 566 Manufacturer Identification.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2127-0043.
    Affected Public: New manufacturers of motor vehicles and motor
vehicle equipment subject to the Federal motor vehicle safety
standards.
    Requested Expiration Date of Approval: July 31, 2020.
    Form Number: None.
    Abstract: If a motor vehicle or item of replacement motor vehicle
equipment contains a defect related to motor vehicle safety or fails to
comply with an applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standard
(FMVSS), the manufacturer is required under 49 U.S.C. 30118 to furnish
notification of the defect or noncompliance to the Secretary of
Transportation, as well as to owners, purchasers, and dealers of the
motor vehicle or replacement equipment, and to remedy the defect or
noncompliance without charge to the owner. To ensure that manufacturers
are meeting these and other responsibilities under the statutes and
regulations administered by NHTSA, the agency issued 49 CFR part 566,
Manufacturer Identification. The regulations in part 566 require
manufacturers of motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment to which a
FMVSS applies, to submit to NHTSA, on a one-time basis, identifying
information on themselves and a description of the products that they
manufacture to those standards. With changes implemented in 2015,
manufacturers have been able to make these submissions using an online
portal on the agency's Web site at https://vpic.nhtsa.dot.gov/.
    The information that must be submitted includes: (a) The full
individual, partnership, or corporate name of the manufacturer; (b) the
business name of the manufacturer commonly known to the public; (c) the
residence address of the manufacturer and State of incorporation if
applicable; (d) full contact information for the manufacturer and the
submitting official; and (e) a description of each type of motor
vehicle or of covered equipment manufactured by the manufacturer,
including, for motor vehicles, the approximate ranges of gross vehicle
weight ratings (GVWR) for each vehicle type. The regulations specify
that the description may be of a general type, such as ``passenger
cars'' or ``brake fluid,'' but that in the case of multipurpose
passenger vehicles, trucks, and trailers, the description shall be
specific enough to indicate the types of use for which the vehicles are
intended, such as ``tank trailer,'' ``motor home,'' or ``cargo van.''
See 49 CFR 566.5(c)(1) and (2).
    The regulations further specify that in the case of motor vehicles
produced in two or more stages, if the manufacturer is an incomplete
vehicle manufacturer, the description shall so state and include a
description indicating the stage of completion of the vehicle and,
where known, the types of use for which the vehicles are intended, such
as ``Incomplete vehicle manufacturer--Chassis-cab intended for
completion as a van-type truck.'' See 49 CFR 566.5(c)(3). The
regulations also specify that if the manufacturer is an intermediate
manufacturer, or a final stage manufacturer of a vehicle manufactured
in two or more stages, the description shall so state and include a
brief description of the work performed, such as ``Multipurpose
passenger vehicles: Motor homes with GVWR from 8,000 to 12,000 pounds.
Final-stage manufacturer--add body to bare chassis.'' Ibid.

    The information must be submitted no later than 30 days after the
manufacturer begins to manufacture motor vehicles or motor vehicle
equipment subject to the FMVSS. No specific form need be used for the
submission of this information. NHTSA provides an online portal with a
fillable web-based format for use in submitting the required
information. This is described in a handbook entitled Requirements for
Manufacturers of Motor Vehicles and Motor Vehicle Equipment that can be
accessed on the agency's Web site at https://vpic.nhtsa.dot.gov/. A
description of the reporting requirement is included on pages 8 and 9
of the handbook.
    Manufacturers who have previously submitted identifying information
must ensure that the information on file is accurate and complete by
submitting revised information no later than 30 days after a change in
the business that affects the validity of that information has
occurred.
    In 2013, NHTSA received submissions of manufacturer identifying
information under 49 CFR part 566 from 523 manufacturers. In 2014, the
agency received 507 such submissions. In 2015, the agency received 540.
Based on this volume of submissions, the agency projects that it will
receive approximately 523 part 566 submissions from manufacturers in
each of the next three years. Assuming that it will take a manufacturer
on average 15 minutes to prepare an online submittal, the agency
estimates that 131 hours will be expended on an annual basis by all
manufacturers required to submit part 566 identifying information.
    Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number
and Proposed Frequency of Responses to the Collection of Information):
The agency estimates that it will receive new submissions of
manufacturer identifying information under part 566 from approximately
523 manufacturers of motor vehicles and regulated items of motor
vehicle equipment per year. The manufacturers need only submit the
required information on a one-time basis, with the proviso that they
refile their information through the online portal in the event of any
changes in the information on file within 30 days from the date that
any change in that information occurs.
    Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden of
the Collection of Information: 131 hours.
    Estimate of the Total Annual Costs of the Collection of
Information: Assuming that the part 566 information that needs to be
submitted through the online portal is entered by company officers or
employees compensated at an average rate of $30.00 per hour, the agency
estimates that $3,930 will be expended on an annual basis by all
manufacturers required to submit that information.
    Comments are invited on: whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.

Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-31888 Filed 1-3-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 159 (Thursday, August 16, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40662-40664]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17596]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0632; Airspace Docket No. 17-AWA-4]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of Chicago Class B and Chicago Class C Airspace;
Chicago, IL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule, technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends the Chicago, IL, Class B airspace area
description by changing references for defining the center point of the
Chicago Class B airspace from the Chicago O'Hare VHF Omnidirectional
Range/Distance Measuring Equipment (VOR/DME) to ``Point of Origin.''
The ``Point of Origin'' uses the same geographic coordinates as the
Chicago O'Hare VOR/DME location. This action also amends the Chicago
Midway Airport, IL, Class C airspace description by changing the
reference for defining a portion of the Class C airspace boundary from
using the Chicago O'Hare VOR/DME to using the geographic coordinates of
the Chicago O'Hare VOR/DME instead. The FAA is taking this action due
to the planned decommissioning of the Chicago O'Hare VOR/DME.
Additionally, the Chicago Class B and Chicago Midway Airport Class C
airspace descriptions are edited further to reflect the Chicago Midway
International Airport name change to match the current information in
the FAA's aeronautical database, and the Chicago Midway Airport Class C
airspace designation is amended to remove the airport name from the
airspace designation to comply with FAA regulatory guidance. These
changes are editorial only and do not alter the current charted
boundaries, altitudes, or ATC procedures for the Chicago Class B or the
Chicago Midway International Airport Class C airspace areas.

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, October 11, 2018. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and
publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further

information, you can contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20591; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. The Order is also available for
inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
For information on the availability of FAA Order 7400.11B at NARA, call
(202) 741-6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy Group,
Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it makes editorial corrections to existing Class B and
Class C airspace descriptions to maintain accuracy.

History

    The FAA is planning to decommission the Chicago O'Hare, IL, VOR/DME
in January 2019 in support of construction activities for creating a
new runway at Chicago O'Hare International Airport. To ensure there
will be no change to the existing charted boundaries of the Chicago
Class B or Chicago Midway Airport Class C airspace areas, the FAA is
retaining the geographic coordinates of the Chicago O'Hare VOR/DME
location as the center point for the Class B airspace and also using
them to define a portion of the boundary of the Chicago Midway Airport
Class C airspace.
    Class B airspace designations are published in paragraph 3000 and
Class C airspace designations are published in paragraph 4000 of FAA
Order 7400.11B, dated August 3, 2017, and effective September 15, 2017,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class B and
Class C airspace designations listed in this document will be
subsequently published in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017, and effective September 15,
2017. FAA Order 7400.11B is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11B lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    The FAA is amending Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by editing the description of the Chicago, IL, Class B airspace
and Chicago Midway Airport, IL, Class C airspace areas to remove
references to the ``Chicago O'Hare VOR/DME'' and update the Chicago
Midway International Airport name.
    In the Chicago Class B airspace description, the Chicago VOR/DME is
replaced with ``Point of Origin'' for defining the center point of the
Class B airspace area.
    In the Chicago Midway International Airport Class C airspace
description, the arc around the Chicago VOR/DME is replaced by a radius
around a point at the geographic coordinates of the Chicago VOR/DME for
defining a portion of the Class C airspace boundary.
    The FAA is taking these actions so the currently charted boundaries
of the Class B and Class C airspace areas are not affected by the
planned decommissioning of the Chicago O'Hare VOR/DME.
    The Chicago Class B and Chicago Class C airspace descriptions are
also updated by changing the airport name Chicago Midway Airport to
Chicago Midway International Airport, to be in concert with the data
currently contained in the FAA's aeronautical database.
    Additionally, this action removes the airport name from the
Chicago, IL, Class C airspace designation to comply with the FAA's
regulatory guidance.
    Because this action is a minor editorial change that does not alter
the currently charted boundaries, altitudes, or ATC procedures for the
Chicago, IL, Class B and the Chicago Midway International Airport, IL,
Class C airspace, I find that notice and public procedure under 5
U.S.C. 553(b) are unnecessary and contrary to the public interest.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so
minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action of amending the airspace
descriptions of the Chicago, IL, Class B and Chicago Midway
International Airport, IL, Class C airspace areas, by changing the
references to the Chicago O'Hare VOR/DME to ``Point of Origin'' in the
Chicago Class B description and to using the Chicago O'Hare VOR/DME
geographic coordinates in the Chicago Midway Airport Class C
description, due to the planned decommissioning of the Chicago, IL,
VOR/DME, qualifies for categorical exclusion under the National
Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321; its implementing regulations
at 40 CFR part 1500; and its agency-specific implementing regulations
in FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures'' regarding categorical exclusions for procedural actions at
paragraph 5-6.5a, which categorically excludes from full environmental
impact review rulemaking actions that designate or modify classes of
airspace areas, airways, routes, and reporting points. This airspace
action is an editorial change only and is not expected to result in any
potentially significant environmental impacts. In accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1F, paragraph 5-2 regarding Extraordinary Circumstances,
this action has been reviewed for factors and circumstances in which a
normally categorically excluded action may have a significant
environmental impact requiring further analysis, and it is determined
that no

extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11B,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 3, 2017, and
effective September 15, 2017, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 3000 Subpart B--Class B Airspace.

* * * * *

AGL IL B Chicago, IL

Chicago O'Hare International Airport (Primary Airport)
    (Lat. 41[deg]58'38'' N, long. 87[deg]54'29'' W)
Chicago Midway International Airport
    (Lat. 41[deg]47'10'' N, long. 87[deg]45'09'' W)
Point of Origin
    (Lat. 41[deg]59'16'' N, long. 87[deg]54'17'' W)

Boundaries

    Area A. That airspace extending upward from the surface to and
including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line beginning
at lat. 42[deg]04'11'' N, long. 87[deg]55'31'' W; thence clockwise
along the 5 NM radius of the Point of Origin to lat. 41[deg]59'15''
N, long. 87[deg]47'35'' W; thence east to lat. 41[deg]59'15'' N,
long. 87[deg]46'15'' W; thence clockwise along the 6 NM radius of
the Point of Origin to Interstate Highway 355 (I-355)
(41[deg]57'16'' N, 88[deg]01'52'' W); thence north along I-355 to
Interstate Highway 290 (I-290) (lat. 41[deg]57'12'' N, long.
88[deg]01'56'' W); thence north along I-290 to the 6 NM radius of
the Point of Origin (lat. 42[deg]01'17'' N, long. 88[deg]01'52'' W);
thence clockwise along the 6 NM radius of the Point of Origin to
U.S. Highway 12 (lat. 42[deg]05'03'' N, long. 87[deg]56'26'' W);
thence southeast along U.S. Highway 12 to the point of beginning.
    Area B. That airspace extending upward from 1,900 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of the 5 NM radius of the Point of
Origin and the railroad tracks at lat. 42[deg]03'57'' N, long.
87[deg]51'55'' W; thence northeast along the railroad tracks to
Willow Road (lat. 42[deg]06'20'' N, long. 87[deg]49'38'' W); thence
east along Willow Road to the 10 NM radius of the Point of Origin
(lat. 42[deg]06'04'' N, long. 87[deg]44'26'' W); thence clockwise
along the 10 NM radius of the Point of Origin to the 5 NM radius of
Chicago Midway International Airport (lat. 41[deg]49'34'' N, long.
87[deg]51'00'' W); thence counterclockwise along the 5 NM radius of
the Chicago Midway International Airport to the 10.5 NM radius of
the Point of Origin (lat. 41[deg]48'59'' N, long. 87[deg]51'22'' W);
thence clockwise along the 10.5 NM radius of the Point of Origin to
the 10 NM radius of the Chicago Midway International Airport (lat.
41[deg]49'11'' N, long. 87[deg]58'14'' W); thence clockwise along
the 10 NM radius of Chicago Midway International Airport to the 10
NM radius of the Point of Origin (lat. 41[deg]49'40'' N, long.
87[deg]58'05'' W); thence clockwise along the 10 NM radius of the
Point of Origin to U.S. Highway 12 (lat. 42[deg]08'01'' N, long.
88[deg]00'46'' W); thence southeast along U.S. Highway 12 to the 5
NM radius of the Point of Origin (lat. 42[deg]04'10'' N, long.
87[deg]55'31'' W); thence clockwise along the 5 NM radius of the
Point of Origin to the point of beginning, excluding that airspace
designated as Area A.
    Area C. That airspace extending upward from 3,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by the 15 NM
radius of the Point of Origin, excluding that airspace designated as
Area A, Area B, Area G, and Area H.
    Area D. That airspace extending upward from 3,600 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at lat. 42[deg]07'52'' N, long. 88[deg]10'47'' W; thence
northwest to the 25 NM radius of the Point of Origin (lat.
42[deg]15'40'' N, long. 88[deg]19'39'' W); thence clockwise along
the 25 NM radius of the Point of Origin to lat. 41[deg]42'03'' N,
long. 88[deg]18'34'' W; thence northeast to the 15 NM radius of the
Point of Origin (lat. 41[deg]49'53'' N, long. 88[deg]09'59'' W);
thence clockwise along the 15 NM radius of the Point of Origin to
the point of beginning, excluding that airspace designated as Area
A, Area B, Area C, Area G, and Area H.
    Area E. That airspace extending upward from 4,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at lat. 42[deg]11'11'' N, long. 87[deg]24'46'' W; thence
east to the 30 NM radius of the Point of Origin (lat. 42[deg]10'39''
N, long. 87[deg]17'01'' W); thence clockwise along the 30 NM radius
of the Point of Origin to lat. 41[deg]46'38'' N, long.
87[deg]17'51'' W; thence west to the 25 NM radius of the Point of
Origin (lat. 41[deg]46'40'' N, long. 87[deg]25'22'' W); thence
counterclockwise along the 25 NM radius of the Point of Origin to
the point of beginning.
    Area F. That airspace extending upward from 4,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at lat. 42[deg]07'52'' N, long. 88[deg]10'47'' W; thence
northwest to the 25 NM radius of the Point of Origin (lat.
42[deg]15'40'' N, long. 88[deg]19'39'' W); thence counterclockwise
along the 25 NM radius of the Point of Origin to Interstate 90 (lat.
42[deg]07'22'' N, long. 88[deg]26'01'' W); thence west to the 30 NM
radius of the Point of Origin (lat. 42[deg]07'21'' N, long.
88[deg]33'05'' W); thence counterclockwise along the 30 NM radius of
the Point of Origin to County Road 10 (lat. 41[deg]49'49'' N, long.
88[deg]32'27'' W); thence east along County Road 10 to the 25 NM
radius of the Point of Origin (lat. 41[deg]50'40'' N, long.
88[deg]25'44'' W); thence counterclockwise along the 25 NM radius of
the Point of Origin to lat. 41[deg]42'03'' N, long. 88[deg]18'34''
W; thence northeast to the 15 NM radius of the Point of Origin (lat.
41[deg]49'53'' N, long. 88[deg]09'59'' W); thence clockwise along
the 15 NM radius of the Point of Origin to the point of beginning.
    Area G. That airspace extending upward from 2,500 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at lat. 42[deg]04'15'' N, long. 87[deg]54'56'' W; thence
northwest to the 10 NM radius of the Point of Origin (lat.
42[deg]09'00'' N, long. 87[deg]57'22'' W); thence counterclockwise
along the 10 NM radius of the Point of Origin to U.S. Highway 12
(lat. 42[deg]08'01'' N, long. 88[deg]00'46'' W); thence southeast
along U.S. Highway 12 to the 5 NM radius of the Point of Origin
(lat. 42[deg]04'11'' N, long. 87[deg]55'31'' W); thence clockwise
along the 5 NM radius of the Point of Origin to the point of
beginning.
    Area H. That airspace extending upward from 2,500 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line
beginning at the intersection of Willow Road and railroad tracks at
lat. 42[deg]06'20'' N, long. 87[deg]49'38'' W; thence northeast
along the railroad tracks to the 10 NM radius of the Point of Origin
(lat. 42[deg]08'06'' N, long. 87[deg]48'00'' W); thence clockwise
along the 10 NM radius of the Point of Origin to Willow Road (lat.
42[deg]06'04'' N, long. 87[deg]44'26'' W); thence west along Willow
Road to the point of beginning.
* * * * *

Paragraph 4000 Subpart C--Class C Airspace.

* * * * *

AGL IL C Chicago, IL

Chicago Midway International Airport, IL
    (Lat. 41[deg]47'10'' N, long. 87[deg]45'09'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to 3,600 feet
MSL within a 5-mile radius of the Chicago Midway International
Airport; and that airspace extending upward from 1,900 feet MSL to
3,600 feet MSL within a 10-mile radius of the airport beginning from
a line 2-miles northeast of and parallel to the Chicago Midway
International Airport Runway 31C localizer course, thence clockwise
along the 10-mile radius of the airport to the intersection with the
10.5-mile radius around a point centered at lat. 41[deg]59'16'' N,
long. 87[deg]54'17'' W, thence counterclockwise along that 10.5-mile
radius to the intersection with the Chicago Midway International
Airport 5-mile radius. This Class C airspace area excludes the
airspace within the Chicago, IL, Class B airspace area.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 9, 2018.
Rodger A. Dean, Jr.,
Manager, Airspace Policy Group.
[FR Doc. 2018-17596 Filed 8-15-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 120 (Friday, June 23, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28562-28565]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13185]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0442; FRL-9964-14-OAR]
RIN 2060-AT57

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the
Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry: Alternative Monitoring Method

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is taking direct final action to amend the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland
Cement Manufacturing Industry. This direct final rule provides a
compliance alternative for sources that would otherwise be required to
use a hydrogen chloride (HCl) continuous emissions monitoring system
(CEMS) to demonstrate compliance with the HCl emissions limit. This
compliance alternative is needed due to the current unavailability of
the HCl calibration gases used for CEMS quality assurance purposes.

DATES: This rule is effective on July 5, 2017 without further notice,
unless the EPA receives significant adverse comment by July 3, 2017. If
the EPA receives significant adverse comment, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule
will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2016-0442, at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brian Storey, Sector Policies and
Programs Division (D243-04), Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; and email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Organization of This Document. The
information in this preamble is organized as follows:

I. General Information
    A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
    B. Does this direct final rule apply to me?
    C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?
II. What are the amendments made by this direct final rule?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
    A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
    B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
    C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
    D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
    E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
    F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
    G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
    H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
    I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
    J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
    K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

I. General Information

A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?

    The EPA is publishing this direct final rule without a prior
proposed rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and do
not anticipate significant adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed
Rules''

section of this Federal Register, we are publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposed rule to amend the National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement
Manufacturing Industry, if the EPA receives significant adverse
comments on this direct final rule. We will not institute a second
comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting
must do so at this time. For further information about commenting on
this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this document.
    If the EPA receives significant adverse comment on all or a
distinct portion of this direct final rule, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that some or
all of this direct final rule will not take effect. We would address
all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on the proposed
rule.

B. Does this direct final rule apply to me?

    Categories and entities potentially regulated by this direct final
rule include:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Category                          NAICS code \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Portland cement manufacturing            327310
 facilities.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North American Industry Classification System.

    This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this
direct final rule. To determine whether your facility is affected, you
should examine the applicability criteria in 40 CFR 63.1340. If you
have questions regarding the applicability of any aspect of this action
to a particular entity, consult either the air permitting authority for
the entity or your EPA Regional representative as listed in 40 CFR
63.13.

C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?

    Do not submit information containing CBI to the EPA through http://www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information on a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM
as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comments that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comments that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. Send or deliver information
identified as CBI only to the following address: OAQPS Document Control
Officer (C404-02), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2016-0442.

II. What are the amendments made by this direct final rule?

    Under the rule published in 2013 (78 FR 10006, February 12, 2013),
the owner or operator of a kiln subject to the emission limits for HCl
in 40 CFR 63.1343 may demonstrate compliance by one of the following
methods:
     Option 1--An owner or operator of a kiln may demonstrate
compliance by operating a CEMS meeting the requirements of performance
specification (PS) 15, PS-18, or any other PS for HCl CEMS in appendix
B to part 60, with compliance based on a 30-kiln operating day rolling
average.
     Option 2--If the kiln is controlled using a wet scrubber,
tray tower, or dry scrubber, the owner or operator, as an alternative
to using a CEMS, may demonstrate compliance with the HCl limit using
one of two options, described below.
    Under Option 2, a performance test must be conducted by the owner
or operator using Method 321. While conducting the Method 321
performance test (note Method 321 is the HCl stack testing performance
method required by this rule), the owner or operator must
simultaneously measure a control device parameter in order to
establishe a site-specific parameter limit that must be continuously
monitored to determine compliance. If the kiln is controlled using a
wet scrubber or tray tower, the owner or operator must also monitor the
pressure drop across the scrubber and/or liquid flow rate and pH during
the HCl performance test. If the kiln is controlled using a dry
scrubber, the sorbent injection rate must be monitored during the
performance test. As an alternative under Option 2, the owner or
operator may establish sulfur dioxide (SO2) as the operating
parameter by measuring SO2 emissions using a CEMS
simultaneously with the Method 321 test and establishing the site-
specific SO2 limit that must then be continuously monitored
to determine compliance with the HCl limit.
    The 2013 rule requires that if a source chooses to (or is required
to) monitor HCl emissions using a CEMS (Option 1), they must do so in
accordance with PS-15, PS-18, or any other PS for HCl CEMS in appendix
B to part 60 of this chapter. (See 40 CFR part 60, appendix B.) Quality
assurance procedures for HCl CEMS require that they be capable of
reading HCl concentrations that span a range of possible emission
levels below as well as above expected HCl emission concentrations.
These quality assurance procedures require the use of National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-traceable calibration
gases for HCl.
    Following our decision to create PS-18 and Procedure 6 for HCl
continuous monitoring in 2012, the EPA worked with NIST and commercial
gas vendors on development of NIST-traceable HCl gas standards to
support the PS-18 in the 2013 rulemaking. While some of the low HCl
concentration (<10 parts per million, or ppm) NIST-traceable gases have
been available on a limited basis since 2013, the full range of HCl
concentrations required to support all HCl emissions monitoring
technologies (including integrated path that requires concentrations
100 times higher) are not widely available at this time.
    The approach used by NIST in 2013 was to certify the Research Gas
Material (RGM) cylinders as primary gas standards. These cylinders
contain HCl gas and are provided to NIST by vendors for NIST
certification, and subsequently used by the vendors as transfer
standards to prepare the Gas Manufacturer Intermediate Standards
(GMIS). The GMIS cylinders are then used to produce NIST-traceable gas
cylinders that are sold commercially.\1\ The initial approach used by
NIST to certify the RGM cylinders was not viable in the long term as
the instrumentation used by NIST largely depleted the HCl RGM gas
volume, leaving little gas in the cylinder for the vendors to use in
preparing GMIS materials. Because of this concern, NIST initiated
development of an improved RGM certification procedure. The development
has been hampered by the challenges presented in handling HCl gas. HCl
gas is extremely reactive and difficult to handle in both gas cylinders
and analytically. As such, it has taken considerable time for NIST to
optimize the analytical equipment and approach to achieve the necessary
uncertainty requirements (e.g., <1 percent uncertainty).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of
Gaseous Calibration Standards, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and
Development, EPA/600/R-12/531, May 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the commercial establishment of NIST-traceable gases
is dependent on collaboration between

NIST and the specialty gas vendors. There are a limited number of
vendors providing the stable, accurate, low and high concentration
cylinder gases to NIST to certify as RGMs. Once the RGMs are available,
the specialty gas vendors must complete a series of procedures to
establish the certainty of their products which adds to the time to
achieve wide commercial availability.
    As a result, on July 25, 2016 (81 FR 48356), the EPA provided an
additional compliance alternative for sources that would otherwise be
required to use an HCl CEMS (Option 1). The alternative was provided
for a period of 1 year. In the alternative, the HCl CEMS was still
required to be installed and operated, but actual compliance with the
HCl emissions limit was determined by a three-run stack test. The HCl
CEMS still provided a continuous readout of HCl emissions, but because
the CEMS was not calibrated with the required NIST-traceable
calibration gases, the HCl measurement was not considered to be
sufficiently accurate on an absolute basis for compliance. However, it
was found to be sufficient to indicate any relative change in HCl
emissions occurring subsequent to the compliance test. Therefore, the
HCl CEMS under the compliance alternative functioned as a continuous
parameter monitoring system (CPMS), as in the case of the particulate
matter (PM) CPMS requirement (see 78 FR 10014-10015, 10019-10020,
February 12, 2013).
    It is the EPA's understanding that the availability of NIST-
traceable calibration gases for HCl has not changed since the
compliance alternative approval in 2016. Thus, the EPA intends to
extend the use of this compliance alternative until such time as the
NIST-traceable calibration gases for HCl become readily available.
    Under this extension of the compliance alternative, the owner or
operator will demonstrate initial compliance by conducting a
performance test using Method 321 and will monitor compliance with an
operating parameter limit through use of the HCl CEMS operating as a
HCl CPMS. For the HCl CPMS, the owner or operator will use the average
HCl CPMS indicated output, typically displayed as parts per million by
volume (ppmv), wet basis HCl recorded at in-stack oxygen concentration
during the HCl performance test to establish the operating limit. To
determine continuous compliance with the operating limit, the owner or
operator will record the indicated HCl CPMS output data for all periods
when the process is operating and use all the HCl CPMS data, except
data obtained during times of monitor malfunctions. Thus, continuous
compliance with the operating limit will be demonstrated by using all
valid hourly average data collected by the HCl CPMS for all operating
hours to calculate the arithmetic average operating parameter in units
of the operating limit (indicated ppm) on a 30-kiln operating day
rolling average basis, updated at the end of each new kiln operating
day. An exceedance of the kiln 30-day operating limit would trigger
evaluation of the control system operation and resetting the operating
limit based on a new correlation with performance testing. For kilns
with inline raw mills, performance testing and monitoring HCl to
establish the site specific operating limit must be conducted during
both raw mill on and raw mill off conditions.
    As is the case for the PM CPMS requirements (see 40 CFR
63.1349(b)(1)(i)), this alternative for HCl compliance monitoring
includes a scaling factor of 75 percent of the emission standard as a
benchmark (2.25 ppmv, dry basis at 7-percent oxygen). Sources that
choose this option will conduct a Method 321 test to determine
compliance with the HCl emissions standard and during this testing will
also monitor their HCl CPMS output in indicated ppm to determine where
their HCl CPMS output would intersect 75 percent of their allowed HCl
emissions, and set their operating level at that ppm output. This
scaling procedure alleviates re-testing concerns for sources that
operate well below the emission limit and provides greater operational
flexibility while assuring continuous compliance with the HCl emission
standard. For sources whose Method 321 compliance tests place them at
or above 75 percent of the emission standard, their operating limit is
determined by the average of three Method 321 test runs (for sources
with no inline raw mill) or the time weighted average of six Method 321
test runs (for kilns with inline raw mills). By adopting a scaling
factor as well as the use of 30 days of averaged HCl CPMS measurements,
the parametric limit in no way imposes a stringency level higher than
the level of the HCl emissions standard and will avoid triggering
unnecessary retests for many facilities, especially for the lower-
emitting sources.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was,
therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose any new information collection burden
under the PRA. OMB has previously approved the information collection
activities contained in the existing regulation (40 CFR part 63,
subpart LLL) and has assigned OMB control number 2060-0416. This action
does not change the information collection requirements.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This action
does not create any new requirements or burdens and no costs are
associated with this direct final action.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain an unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. It will neither impose substantial direct
compliance costs on federally recognized tribal governments, nor
preempt tribal law. The EPA is aware of one tribally owned Portland
cement facility currently subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart LLL that
will be subject to this direct final rule. However, the provisions of
this direct final rule are not expected to impose new or substantial
direct compliance costs on tribal governments since the provisions in
this direct final rule are

extending the use of an alternative to the HCl monitoring provisions,
including an option which provides operational flexibility. Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations, and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
This action does not affect the level of protection provided to human
health or the environment.

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: June 19, 2017.
E. Scott Pruitt,
Administrator.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency is amending title 40, chapter I, part 63 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR), as follows:

PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES

0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart LLL--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry

Sec.  63.1349  [Amended]

0
2. Section 63.1349 is amended by removing paragraph (b)(6)(v)(H).

0
3. Section 63.1350 is amended by revising paragraph (l)(4) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.1350  Monitoring requirements.

* * * * *
    (l) * * *
    (4) If you monitor continuous performance through the use of an HCl
CPMS according to Sec.  63.1349(b)(6)(v)(A) through (G), for any
exceedance of the 30-kiln operating day HCl CPMS average value from the
established operating limit, you must:
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-13185 Filed 6-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 142 (Tuesday, July 26, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44383-44384]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15997]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1059-000.
    Applicants: Dauphin Island Gathering Partners.
    Description: Cash Out Report for 2022 of Dauphin Island Gathering
Partners.
    Filed Date: 7/19/22.
    Accession Number: 20220719-5218.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/1/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1060-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Rate Schedules GSS & LSS EGTS
Penalty Flow Through Refund Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 7/20/22.
    Accession Number: 20220720-5004.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/1/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at:http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 20, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-15997 Filed 7-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 116 (Thursday, June 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39296-39298]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14205]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-78034; File No. SR-BatsBZX-2016-25]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to Rule
11.24, Opening Process for Non-BZX-Listed Securities

June 10, 2016.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on June 9, 2016, Bats BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BZX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
has designated this proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder,\4\ which renders it effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to amend Rule 11.24, Opening Process for
Non-BZX-Listed Securities, to await a two-sided quotation from the
listing exchange prior to re-opening a security for trading following a
halt, suspension, or pause in trading. The Exchange has designated this
proposal as non-controversial and provided the Commission with the
notice required by

Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) under the Act.\5\ The Exchange requests that the
Commission waive the 30-day pre-operative waiting period contained in
Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) under the Act.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 11.24, Opening Process for Non-
BZX-Listed Securities, to await a two-sided quotation from the listing
exchange prior to re-opening a security for trading following a halt,
suspension, or pause in trading.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The re-opening process for BZX-Listed Securities is set
forth under Exchange Rule 11.23(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Exchange Rule 11.24 describes the Exchange's current Opening and
Re-Opening Process for non-BZX-Listed securities. Subparagraph (e) to
Rule 11.24 states that while a non-BZX-listed security is subject to a
halt, suspension, or pause in trading, the Exchange will accept orders
for queuing prior to the resumption of trading in the security for
participation in the Re-Opening Process. Subparagraph (a) to Rule 11.24
states that, prior to the beginning of the Regular Trading Hours, Users
\8\ who wish to participate in the Opening Process may enter orders to
buy or sell.\9\ Subparagraph (a)(2) to Rule 11.24 provides that, with
certain exceptions,\10\ all orders with a time-in-force instruction of
Regular Hours Only may participate in the Opening Process. Subparagraph
(e)(1) to Rule 11.24 states that the Re-Opening Process will occur in
the same manner described in Rule 11.24(a)(2) and (b) described
above,\11\ also with certain exceptions.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Exchange Rule 1.5(cc).
    \9\ Orders cancelled prior to the Opening Process will not
participate in the Opening Process.
    \10\ The following order types and instruction may not
participate in the opening process: BZX Post Only Orders, Partial
Post Only at Limit Orders, ISOs not modified by Rule 11.24(a)(1)
above, and Minimum Quantity Orders. See Exchange Rule 11.24(a)(2).
Limit orders with a Reserve Quantity may participate to the full
extent of their displayed size and Reserve Quantity. Id.
Discretionary Orders may participate only up to their ranked price
for buy orders or down to their ranked price for sell orders. Id.
The discretionary range of such orders will not be eligible for
participation in the Opening Process. Id. All Pegged Orders and Mid-
Point Peg Orders, as defined in Rule 11.9(c)(8) and (9), will be
eligible for execution in the Opening Process based on their pegged
prices. Id.
    \11\ Subparagraph (b) to Rule 11.24 states that the Exchange
will open by performing the Opening Process in which the System will
attempt to match buy and sell orders that are executable at the
midpoint of the National Best Bid and Offer (``NBBO''). Furthermore,
subparagraph (b) of Rule 11.24 also states that all orders
executable at the midpoint of the NBBO will continue to be processed
in time sequence, beginning with the order with the oldest time
stamp. Matches occur until there are no remaining contra-side orders
or there is an imbalance of orders. An imbalance of orders may
result in orders that cannot be executed in whole or in part. Any
unexecuted orders may then be placed by the System on the BZX Book,
cancelled, executed, or routed to away Trading Centers in accordance
with the Users' instructions pursuant to Exchange Rule 11.13(a)(2).
    \12\ Orders without a time-in-force instruction of Regular Hours
Only are eligible to participate in the Re-Opening Process, but IOC,
FOK, BZX Post Only Orders, and Minimum Quantity Orders will be
cancelled or rejected, as applicable, and any ISO that is not IOC or
FOK will be converted into a non-ISO and be queued for participation
in the Re-Opening Process. See Exchange Rule 11.24(e)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Subparagraph (e)(1) to Exchange Rule 11.24 also sets forth the
process by which the System sets the price of the Re-Opening Process.
Currently, the System \13\ sets the price of the Re-Opening Process at
the midpoint of the: (i) First NBBO subsequent to the first reported
trade on the listing exchange following the resumption of trading after
a halt, suspension, or pause; or (ii) NBBO when the first two-sided
quotation is published by the listing exchange following the resumption
of trading after a halt, suspension, or pause if no first trade is
reported by the listing exchange within one second of publication of
the first two-sided quotation by the listing exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Exchange Rule 1.5(aa).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to amend subparagraph (e)(1) to Rule 11.24 to
now await a two-sided quotation from the listing exchange prior to
opening a security for trading. As amended, subparagraph (e)(1) to Rule
11.24 would state that the System would set the price of the Re-Opening
Process at the midpoint of the first NBBO subsequent to the first
reported trade and first two-sided quotation on the listing exchange
following the resumption of trading after a halt, suspension, or pause.
The Exchange will utilize the current NBBO to calculate the security's
re-opening price once a trade and two-sided quotation are received from
the listing exchange, regardless of the order in which the trade or
quotation are received. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change
will enable the listing market's quotation to be incorporated into the
NBBO, which the Exchange would, in turn, utilize in its calculation of
the midpoint of the NBBO. The Exchange believes doing so would result
in a re-opening price that more closely reflects the market prices and
conditions for that security. Under subparagraph (e)(1) to Rule 11.24,
the Exchange will continue to alternatively set the price of the Re-
Opening Process at the midpoint of the NBBO when the first two-sided
quotation is published by the listing exchange following the resumption
of trading after a halt, suspension, or pause if no first trade is
reported by the listing exchange within one second of publication of
the first two-sided quotation by the listing exchange.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \14\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \15\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes the
proposed rule change will promote just and equitable principles of
trade, removes impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and
open market and a national market system because it enables the System
to execute the Re-Opening Process at a price that is objectively
established by the market for the security. The proposal would enable
the listing market's quotation to be incorporated into the NBBO, which
the Exchange would, in turn, utilize in its calculation of the midpoint
of the NBBO. The Exchange believes doing so would result in a re-
opening price that more closely reflect the market prices and
conditions for that security. Therefore, the Exchange believes the

proposed rule change promotes just and equitable principles of trade
because it ensures a midpoint price that the Exchange believes would
accurately reflect the market for the security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposal will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change will enable the
Exchange to incorporate the listing market's quotation into its
calculation of the midpoint of the NBBO, resulting in a re-opening
price that would more closely reflect the opening market prices and
conditions for that security. Therefore, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change will promote competition by enhancing the quality
of the Exchange's opening process.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \16\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \18\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \19\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange
states that waiver of the 30-day operative delay would allow market
participants to immediately realize the benefits of what may be more
accurate re-opening prices. Based on the foregoing, the Commission
believes the waiver of the operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. Therefore, the
Commission hereby waives the operative delay and designates the
proposal operative upon filing.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \20\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-BatsBZX-2016-25 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-BatsBZX-2016-25. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-BatsBZX-2016-25, and should be
submitted on or before July 7, 2016.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-14205 Filed 6-15-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 125 (Friday, June 28, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 31066]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13841]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0104; FRL-9995-75]

Safer Choice Partner of the Year Awards Call for Submissions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA Safer Choice program is accepting submissions for its
2019 Safer Choice Partner of the Year Awards. EPA developed the Partner
of the Year Awards to recognize the leadership contributions of Safer
Choice partners and stakeholders who, over the past year, have shown
outstanding achievement in the design, manufacture, selection, and use
of products with safer chemicals. All Safer Choice stakeholders and
program participants in good standing are eligible for recognition.
Interested parties must inform the program that they would like to be
considered for an award and submit supporting information.

DATES: Submissions are due on or before July 31, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Please submit materials by email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and 87d5f2f3f4e4efa9cbeee9e3e6c7e2f7e6a9e0e8f1. The docket
for this action, identified by docket information (ID) number EPA-HQ-
OPPT-2019-0104, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket),
Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone
number for the OPPT Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review the visitor
instructions and additional information about the docket available at
http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Rutsch, Chemistry, Economics and
Sustainable Strategies Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 7406M, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 343-9924; email address: [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are a Safer
Choice program partner or stakeholder. The following list of North
American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended
to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine
whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities
may include:
     325510 Paint and Coating Manufacturing.
     325611 Soap and Other Detergent Manufacturing.
     325612 Polish and Other Sanitation Good Manufacturing.
     325910 Printing Ink Manufacturing.
     325992 Photographic Film, Paper, Plate, and Chemical
Manufacturing.
     325998 All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and
Preparation Manufacturing.
     561210 Facilities Support Services.
     561720 Janitorial Services.
     561740 Carpet and Upholstery Cleaning Services.
     611310 Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools.
     8123 Dry Cleaning and Laundry Services.
     921190 Other General Government Support.
    If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this
program to a particular entity, consult the technical information
contact listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

II. Background

    As part of its environmental mission, the Safer Choice program
partners with businesses and others to help consumers and commercial
buyers identify products with safer chemical ingredients, without
sacrificing quality or performance. Toward this end, the Safer Choice
program certifies products containing ingredients that have met the
program's specific and rigorous human health and environmental
toxicological criteria. The Safer Choice program allows the use of its
label on products that perform and contain safer ingredients, as
determined by expert evaluation. The Safer Choice program recognition
represents a high level of achievement in formulating products that are
safer for people and the environment. The purpose of the Partner of the
Year Awards is to recognize the leadership contributions of Safer
Choice partners and stakeholders who, over the past year, have shown
outstanding achievement in the design, manufacture, selection, and use
of products with safer chemicals. Award winners will be recognized at a
Safer Choice Partner of the Year Awards ceremony in the fall of 2019.

III. How can I participate?

    To be considered for a Partner of the Year Award, candidates must
notify Safer Choice of their interest and must submit supporting
information on their accomplishments and contributions focusing on
calendar year 2018. There is no form required for this year's
application. Candidates interested in learning more about the Partner
of the Year Awards should refer to the Safer Choice website: https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice/safer-choice-partner-year-awards.

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.

    Dated: June 24, 2019.
Alexandra Dapolito Dunn,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2019-13841 Filed 6-27-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P