[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 4, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54415-54416]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21501]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0280; Airspace Docket No. 13-ANM-13]

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Ennis, MT

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E airspace at Ennis-
Big Sky Airport, Ennis, MT. Controlled airspace is necessary to
accommodate aircraft using new Area Navigation (RNAV) Global
Positioning System (GPS) standard instrument approach procedures at
Ennis-Big Sky Airport, Ennis, MT. The FAA is proposing this action to
enhance the safety and management of aircraft operations at the
airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 21, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2013-
0280; Airspace Docket No. 13-ANM-13, at the beginning of your comments.
You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA 2013-0280 and Airspace Docket No. 13-ANM-13) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2013-0280 and Airspace Docket No. 13-ANM-13''. The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRM's

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRM's should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by establishing Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius of Ennis-
Big Sky Airport, Ennis, MT, along with a segment extending from 1,200
feet above the surface. Controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate
aircraft using the new RNAV (GPS) standard instrument approach
procedures at Ennis-Big Sky Airport, Ennis, MT. This action would
enhance the safety and management of aircraft operations at the
airport.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005, of
FAA Order 7400.9W, dated August 8, 2012, and effective September 15,
2012, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in this Order.
    The FAA has determined this proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since
this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified this proposed rule, when
promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes
the authority for the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This proposed regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would establish controlled airspace at Ennis-Big Sky
Airport, Ennis, MT.
    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9W, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2012, and effective September 15,
2012 is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ANM MT E5 Ennis, MT [New]

Ennis-Big Sky Airport, Ennis, MT
    (Lat. 45[deg]16'28'' N., long. 111[deg]38'56'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7-mile radius of the Ennis-Big Sky Airport; that airspace
extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface within an area
bounded by a line beginning at lat. 46[deg]09'00'' N., long.
112[deg]04'00'' W.; to lat. 45[deg]50'00'' N., long. 111[deg]33'00''
W.; to lat. 45[deg]33'00'' N., long. 111[deg]32'00'' W.; to lat.
45[deg]11'00'' N., long. 111[deg]27'00'' W.; to lat. 45[deg]07'00''
N., long. 111[deg]44'00'' W.; to lat. 45[deg]20'00'' N., long.
112[deg]00'00'' W.; to lat. 45[deg]40'00'' N., long. 111[deg]49'00''
W.; to lat. 45[deg]51'00'' N., long. 112[deg]27'00'' W.; to lat.
46[deg]08'00'' N., long. 112[deg]15'00'' W., thence to the point of
beginning.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on August 16, 2013.
Clark Desing,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2013-21501 Filed 9-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5082-5084]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2171]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-66251; File No. SR-Phlx-2012-09]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
a Document Removal Fee

January 26, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on January 20, 2012, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to

solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to adopt a fee of $250 per box to ship
documents stored by members or member organizations on the trading
floor to the member or member organization's address of record. While
changes to the Exchange's fee schedule pursuant to this proposal are
effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated these changes to be
operative on February 1, 2012.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaqtrader.com/micro.aspx?id=PHLXfilings, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to charge member
organizations a fee of $250 per box containing documents belonging to
the member or member organization which the Exchange removes from
Exchange space on the trading floor.\3\ The Exchange is instituting a
policy on February 1, 2012, pursuant to which the Exchange will remove
any documents, including storage boxes containing documents, in
Exchange space on the trading floor and ship them to the address of
record of the member or member organization whose name appears on the
documents in question. The Exchange will charge the member organization
a $250 per box Document Removal Fee which will cover staff time,
postage and handling.\4\ Removal of documents from Exchange space may
be necessary to ensure that the Exchange complies with its obligations
under its lease and the Philadelphia Fire Code. Documents which are
stored in compliant space which has been authorized by the Exchange for
use by the member or member organization will not be removed by the
Exchange and therefore will not be subject to the fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange will use standard 1.2 square feet storage boxes
to ship documents left on the trading floor to the member or member
organization's address of record.
    \4\ The Exchange estimates that $250 per box will be the average
administrative cost to the Exchange of removing and shipping the
documents. The Exchange does not view this fee as a potential source
of revenue to the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its schedule of
fees is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act in particular, in
that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees and other charges
among Exchange members and other persons using its facilities. The
Document Removal Fee is reasonable because it allows the Exchange to
recoup costs associated with the administrative burden of removing
documents that are stored by members and member organizations without
authorization in Exchange space on the trading floor. It is equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because it is uniformly applied to all
members and member organizations that store documents in Exchange space
without authorization. The Exchange believes that this is fair since
members and member organizations should not be permitted to use
Exchange space for their own storage needs.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\5\ At any time within 60 days of the filing
of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily
suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-Phlx-2012-09 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-2012-09. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the

Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-
2012-09 and should be submitted on or before February 22, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-2171 Filed 1-31-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: May 29, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 102)]
[Notices]
[Page 29494-29495]
[DOCID:fr29my07-41]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL07-49-000]

Californians for Renewable Energy, Inc. (CARE), Complainant v.
California Public Utilities, Commission (CPUC), California, Department
of Water Resources (CDWR), Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), The
City and County of San Francisco (CCSF), Respondents; Amended Complaint
Notice

May 21, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 24, 2007, Californians for Renewable
Energy, Inc. (CARE) tendered for filing the first

amendment to its complaint against the California Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC), California Department of Water Resources (CDWR),
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), and the City and County of San
Francisco. CARE states that it filed a formal complaint against the
respondents on December 15, 2005.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 31, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-10192 Filed 5-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 216 (Wednesday, November 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 55780]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24311]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-84523; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2018-018]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on Proceedings To
Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To
List and Trade Shares of the Principal Morley Short Duration Index ETF
Under Rule 14.11(c)(4)

November 1, 2018.
    On April 23, 2018, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')
\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to list and
trade shares of the Principal Morley Short Duration Index ETF. The
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on May 8, 2018.\3\ On June 20, 2018, the Commission designated August
6, 2018 as the date by which to approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\4\
On August 3, 2018, the Commission instituted proceedings under Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \5\ to determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change.\6\ The Commission has received one
comment letter on the proposed rule change.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83152 (May 2, 2018),
83 FR 20892.
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83479, 83 FR 29838
(June 26, 2018).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83775, 83 FR 39486
(August 9, 2018). The Commission instituted proceedings to allow for
additional analysis of the proposed rule change's consistency with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, which requires, among other things, that
the rules of a national securities exchange be ``designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade,'' and ``to protect investors and the
public interest.'' See id. at 39487.
    \7\ See letter from Kyle Murray, Assistant General Counsel, Cboe
Global Markets (September 13, 2018), available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboebzx-2018-018/srcboebzx2018018.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \8\ provides that, after initiating
disapproval proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving
or disapproving the proposed rule change not later than 180 days after
the date of publication of notice of filing of the proposed rule
change. The Commission may extend the period for issuing an order
approving or disapproving the proposed rule change, however, by not
more than 60 days if the Commission determines that a longer period is
appropriate and publishes the reasons for such determination. The
proposed rule change was published for notice and comment in the
Federal Register on May 8, 2018. November 4, 2018, is 180 days from
that date, and January 3, 2019, is 240 days from that date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider this proposed
rule change. Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)
of the Act,\9\ designates January 3, 2019, as the date by which the
Commission shall either approve or disapprove the proposed rule change
(File No. SR-CboeBZX-2018-018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Id.
    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-24311 Filed 11-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 24, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47219-47221]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17713]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 70

[EPA-R07-OAR-2021-0416; FRL-8695-02-R7]

Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Revision to Emission Data, Emission
Fees and Process Information Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Operating
Permits Program revision submitted by the State of Missouri on May 25,
2021. These revisions update the listed emission reporting years and
update the emissions fee for permitted sources as set by Missouri
Statute from $48 per ton of air pollution emitted annually to $53 in
calendar year 2021 and $55 per ton of air pollution emitted annually
for emissions in calendar year 2022 and beyond; effective March 30,
2021.

DATES: This final rule is effective on September 23, 2021.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2021-0416. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Heitman, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201
Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number: (913) 551-
7664; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to EPA. A technical support document (TSD) is included in
the rulemaking docket for the proposed rule.

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP and part 70
revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    On June 30, 2021, the EPA proposed to approve Missouri's submitted
SIP and Operating Permits Program revision in the Federal Register (86
FR 34677). The EPA solicited comments on the proposed approval of the
submission and received no comments.

II. What is being addressed in this document?

    The EPA is approving revisions to the Missouri State Implementation
Plan (SIP) and title V Operating Permits Program, 10-6.110 ``Reporting
Emission Data, Emission Fees, and Process Information,'' submitted to
the EPA on May 25, 2021. Revisions to the program include updating
emission reporting years and increasing the annual emission fee. The
annual emission fee will increase from $48 per ton of air pollution
emitted annually to $53 in calendar year 2021 and increase again to $55
per ton of air pollution emitted annually for emissions in calendar
year 2022 and beyond; effective March 30, 2021.

III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP and part 70 revision
been met?

    The State met the public notice requirements for SIP submissions in
accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also satisfied the
completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The State provided
a public comment period for this Operating Permits Program and SIP
revision from August 17, 2020, to October 1, 2020, and received one
comment in support of the

revision. The revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA), including section 110 and implementing regulations
and is consistent with applicable EPA requirements in title V of the
CAA and 40 CFR part 70. The public comment period on the EPA's proposed
rule opened June 30, 2021, the date of its publication in the Federal
Register, and closed on July 30, 2021. During this period, the EPA
received no comments.

IV. What action is the EPA taking?

    The EPA is approving the State's revision to 10 C.S.R. 10-6.110
``Reporting Emission Data, Emission Fees, and Process Information'',
submitted by the State of Missouri on May 25, 2021. This revision
updates the emissions fee for permitted sources in section (3)(A) and
the emission reporting years in Table 4 of section (4)(B), as set by
Missouri Statute. Specifically, section (3)(A) revises the emission
fees section, which is approved under the Operating Permits Program
only, and updates the emissions fee for permitted sources as set by
Missouri Statute from $48 per ton of air pollution emitted annually to
$53 in calendar year 2021 and $55 per ton of air pollution emitted
annually for emissions in calendar year 2022 and beyond; effective
March 30, 2021. Additional information on the EPA's analysis can be
found in the Technical Support Document (TSD) included in this docket.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    The EPA is including regulatory text in this EPA final rule that
includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of
1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is incorporating by reference the Missouri
Regulation described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials
generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 7
Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by October 25, 2021. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (See section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

40 CFR Part 70

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Operating permits,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: August 12,2021.
Edward H. Chu,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR parts
52 and 70 as set forth below:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart AA-Missouri

0
2. In Sec.  52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry ``10-6.110'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1320  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                        EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         State
     Missouri citation               Title          effective date    EPA approval date         Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control
                                      Regulations for the State of Missouri
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
10-6.110...................  Reporting Emission          3/30/2021  8/24/2021, [Insert     Section (3)(A),
                              Data, Emission Fees,                   Federal Register       Emission Fees, has
                              and Process                            citation].             not been approved as
                              Information.                                                  part of the SIP.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

PART 70--STATE OPERATING PERMIT PROGRAMS

0
3. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

0
4. In appendix A to part 70 the entry for ``Missouri'' is amended by
adding paragraph (jj) to read as follows:

Appendix A to Part 70--Approval Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs

* * * * *

Missouri

* * * * *
    (jj) The Missouri Department of Natural Resources submitted
revisions to Missouri rule 10 CSR 10-6.110, ``Reporting Emission Data,
Emission Fees, and Process Information'' on May 25, 2021. The state
effective date is March 30, 2021. This revision is effective September
23, 2021.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-17713 Filed 8-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 209 (Wednesday, October 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64397]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25641]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2014-N-1575]

Best Practices for Communication Between the Food and Drug
Administration and Investigational New Drug Sponsors During Drug
Development; Request for Comments

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; establishment of docket, request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
establishment of a docket to receive suggestions, recommendations, and
comments from interested parties, including academic institutions,
regulated industry, and other interested organizations on best
practices for communication between FDA and investigational new drug
application (IND) sponsors during drug development. These comments will
help FDA identify and ultimately establish best practices to be
included in a draft guidance for industry and review staff.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments by December 29,
2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. Identify comments with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel E. Hartford, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, Rm. 6312, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-0331, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Stephen Ripley, Center
for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    One of FDA's performance commitments made as part of the fifth
authorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) under Title
I of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (Pub.
L. 112-144), related to promoting innovation through enhanced
communication between FDA and sponsors during drug (including
biological product) development, is for FDA to publish draft guidance
for industry and review staff describing best practices for
communication between FDA and IND sponsors during drug development. (A
copy of the PDUFA Reauthorization Performance Goals and Procedures;
Fiscal Years 2013 Through 2017 is available on the FDA Web site at
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/forindustry/userfees/prescriptiondruguserfee/ucm270412.pdf.)
    The guidance will describe FDA's philosophy regarding timely
interactive communication with IND sponsors as a core activity and the
scope of appropriate interactions between the review team and the
sponsor, outline the types of advice that are appropriate for sponsors
to seek from FDA in pursuing their drug development program, describe
the general expectations for the timing of FDA response to IND sponsor
inquiries of simple and clarifying questions or referral of more
complex questions to the formal meeting process, and describe best
practices and communication methods (including the value of person-to-
person scientific dialogue) to facilitate interactions between the FDA
review team and the IND sponsor during drug development. We anticipate
that the best practices will include expectations and agreement on
appropriate methods (e.g., when teleconferencing or secure email may be
the most appropriate means of communication) and frequency of such
communications.

II. Establishment of a Docket and Request for Comments

    To help FDA identify and ultimately establish best practices to be
included in a draft guidance, FDA is requesting public suggestions,
recommendations, and comments for each aspect of the best practices
mentioned above. FDA will consider all comments submitted. FDA
generally will not respond directly to the person or organization
submitting the comment.

III. Comments

    Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to http://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: October 22, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-25641 Filed 10-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P