[Federal Register: August 11, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 155)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 46543-46546]
[DOCID:fr11au08-6]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0375; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-272-AD;
Amendment 39-15627; AD 2008-16-09]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Short Brothers Model SD3-60 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding two existing airworthiness directives
(ADs), which apply to all Short Brothers Model SD3-60 airplanes. One of
the ADs currently requires inspection of the welded joints of the
balance weight brackets for the elevator trim tabs for cracking;
repetitive inspections, as applicable; and corrective actions including
the eventual replacement of all brackets. The other AD currently
requires, for certain airplanes, repetitive inspections for cracking of
the balance weight brackets and replacement of any cracked bracket, and
provides for an optional terminating action for the repetitive
inspections. This new AD requires an additional inspection to detect
cracks of the balance weight brackets, applicable related investigative
and corrective actions, and replacement of a certain balance weight
bracket when it has reached its maximum life limit. This AD results
from a report indicating that several reworked balance weight brackets
have exhibited signs of premature failure. We are issuing this AD to
prevent failure of the balance weight brackets of the elevator trim
tabs, which could cause loss of the balance weight. This could result
in incorrect trim during takeoff and landing, and reduced
controllability of the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective September 15, 2008.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of September 15,
2008.
    On March 14, 2005 (70 FR 9212, February 25, 2005), the Director of
the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of Short
Brothers Alert Service Bulletin SD360-55-A21, dated December 16, 2004.
    On August 3, 2004 (69 FR 38813, June 29, 2004), the Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of Short
Brothers Service Bulletin SD360-55-20, dated June 26, 2003.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact Short
Brothers, Airworthiness & Engineering Quality, P.O. Box 241, Airport
Road, Belfast BT3 9DZ, Northern Ireland.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1175; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to include an AD that supersedes AD 2004-13-08, amendment
39-13690 (69 FR 38813, June 29, 2004); and AD 2005-04-13, amendment 39-
13985 (70 FR 9212, February 25, 2005). The existing ADs apply to all
Short Brothers Model SD3-60 airplanes. That NPRM was published in the
Federal Register on April 1, 2008 (73 FR 17260). That NPRM proposed to
retain the requirements of the existing ADs. That NPRM also proposed to
require an additional inspection to detect cracks of the balance weight
brackets, applicable related investigative and corrective actions, and
replacement of a certain balance weight bracket when it has reached its
maximum life limit.

Comments

    We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. No comments have been received on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that
air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Costs of Compliance

    The following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators
to comply with this AD.

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Average                                      Number of
                                        Work      labor                                         U.S.-
               Action                  hours     rate per    Parts      Cost per airplane     registered                    Fleet cost
                                                   hour                                       airplanes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Inspections (required by AD 2004-          12        $80        (1)   $960, per inspection           21   $20,160, per inspection cycle.
 13-08).                                                               cycle.
 Replacement (required by AD 2004-           8         80       $632   $1,272..............           21   $26,712.
 13-08).
 Inspections (required by AD 2005-          12         80        (1)   $960, per inspection           21   $20,160, per inspection cycle.
 04-13).                                                               cycle.
 Inspection (new required action)..         12         80        (1)   $960, per inspection           21   $20,160, per inspection cycle.
                                                                       cycle.
 Replacement (new required action).          8         80        864   $1,504, per                    21   $31,584, per replacement cycle.
                                                                       replacement cycle.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ None.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
Requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec.  39.13 by
removing amendments 39-13690 (69 FR 38813, June 29, 2004), and 39-13985
(70 FR 9212, February 25, 2005), and by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):

2008-16-09 Short Brothers PLC: Amendment 39-15627. Docket No. FAA-
2008-0375; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-272-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD becomes effective September 15, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes ADs 2004-13-08 and 2005-04-13.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all Short Brothers Model SD3-60
airplanes, certificated in any category.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from a report indicating that several
reworked balance weight brackets have exhibited signs of premature
failure. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the balance
weight bracket of the elevator trim tab, which could cause loss of
the balance weight. This could result in incorrect trim during
takeoff and landing, and reduced controllability of the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Requirements of AD 2004-13-08

Service Bulletin Reference

    (f) The term ``service bulletin,'' as used in paragraphs (g)
through (j) of this AD, means the Accomplishment Instructions of
Short Brothers Service Bulletin SD360-55-20, dated June 26, 2003; or
Revision 1, dated June 20, 2005.

Initial Inspection

    (g) Within 2 months after August 3, 2004 (the effective date of
AD 2004-13-08): Do a dye penetrant inspection for cracking in the
welded joints of the balance weight brackets for the left and right
elevator trim tabs, in accordance with the service bulletin.

Investigative and Corrective Actions if No Cracking Is Found

    (h) If no cracking is found during the inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, do the actions required by paragraphs
(h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD at the applicable compliance times.
    (1) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD
at intervals not to exceed 4,800 flight hours until the bracket is
replaced per paragraph (h)(2) or (i) of this AD.
    (2) Prior to the accumulation of 28,800 total flight hours, or
within 6 months after August 3, 2004, whichever occurs later:
Replace any bracket that has not been replaced per paragraph (i) of
this AD with a new bracket or with a serviceable bracket that has
been inspected in accordance with paragraph (g) of this AD. Replace
in accordance with the service bulletin. Replacement of the brackets
constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections
required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.

Corrective Actions if Any Cracking Is Found

    (i) If any cracking is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g) or (h) of this AD: Before further flight, accomplish
the applicable action in paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD in
accordance with the service bulletin.
    (1) For airplanes that have accumulated less than 28,800 flight
hours and on which all cracking on brackets is less than 0.25 inch
in length: Repair the affected bracket in accordance with part B of
the service bulletin (including the additional dye penetrant
inspection of the repaired welded joint) and repeat the inspection
required by paragraph (g) of this AD at intervals not to exceed
4,800 flight hours; or replace the bracket in accordance with
paragraph (h)(2) of this AD. Replacement of the bracket constitutes
terminating action for the repetitive inspections.
    (2) For any airplane on which any cracking on a bracket is 0.25
inch in length or greater, and for any airplane that has accumulated
28,800 flight hours or more on which any cracking of any length is
found on a bracket: Replace the affected bracket with a new bracket
or with a serviceable bracket that has been inspected in accordance
with paragraph (g) of this AD. Replacement of the bracket
constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections
required by paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.

Refitting

    (j) Before further flight following any inspection per paragraph
(g) or (h) of this AD; or before further flight following repair or
replacement of a bracket per paragraph (h)(2) or (i) of this AD:
Refit the balance weights, covers, and trim tabs, in accordance with
the service bulletin. Where the service bulletin specifies to
contact the manufacturer for disposition of certain conditions while
refitting, obtain further disposition instructions from the Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate;
or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or its delegated
agent).

Parts Installation

    (k) As of August 3, 2004, no person may install on any airplane
a balance weight bracket unless the welded joint has been inspected
in accordance with paragraph (g) of this AD.

Requirements of AD 2005-04-13

Service Bulletin Reference

    (l) The following information applies to the service bulletin
referenced in paragraphs (l) through (o) of this AD:
    (1) The term ``service bulletin,'' as used in paragraphs (l)
through (o) of this AD, means

the Accomplishment Instructions of Short Brothers Alert Service
Bulletin SD360-55-A21, dated December 16, 2004.
    (2) Although the service bulletin specifies to return subject
parts to the manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.

Repetitive Inspections

    (m) For airplanes equipped with balance weight brackets of the
elevator trim tabs having part number SD3-07-6011xA, and having a
serial number beginning with ``X3'' or ``X4'': Prior to the
accumulation of 250 flight hours since installation of the subject
balance weight bracket of the elevator trim tab, or within 30 flight
hours after March 14, 2005 (the effective date of AD 2005-04-13),
whichever is later, do a dye penetrant inspection for cracking of
the balance weight brackets for the left and right elevator trim
tabs, in accordance with the service bulletin.
    (1) For a balance weight bracket on which no cracking is found:
Do paragraph (o) of this AD, and repeat the inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 250 flight hours until paragraph (n) of this
AD is accomplished.
    (2) For a balance weight bracket on which any cracking is found:
Before further flight, replace the bracket with a new or reworked
balance weight bracket that conforms to the approved design standard
in accordance with the service bulletin, and do paragraph (o) of
this AD.

Optional Terminating Action

    (n) For airplanes equipped with balance weight brackets of the
elevator trim tabs having part number SD3-07-6011xA, and having a
serial number beginning with ``X3'' or ``X4'': Replacement of any
subject balance weight bracket with a new or reworked balance weight
bracket that conforms to the approved design standard, in accordance
with the service bulletin, constitutes terminating action for the
repetitive inspections required by paragraph (m) of this AD for the
replaced bracket.

Refitting

    (o) For airplanes equipped with balance weight brackets of the
elevator trim tabs having part number SD3-07-6011xA, and having a
serial number beginning with ``X3'' or ``X4'': Before further flight
following any inspection or replacement of a bracket in accordance
with paragraphs (m) and (n) of this AD: Refit the balance weights,
covers, and trim tabs, in accordance with the service bulletin.
Where the service bulletin specifies to contact the manufacturer for
disposition of certain conditions while refitting, obtain further
disposition instructions from the Manager, International Branch,
ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate; or the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or its delegated agent).

Parts Installation

    (p) For all airplanes: As of March 14, 2005, no person may
install, on any airplane subject to this AD, a balance weight
bracket having part number SD3-07-6011xA, and having a serial number
beginning with ``X3'' or ``X4,'' unless the bracket is also marked
``Rework batch number R-Bxxxxx'' (where ``xxxxx'' is a number).

New Requirements of This AD

Inspection(s) and Replacements

    (q) For airplanes equipped with balance weight brackets of the
elevator trim tabs having part number SD3-07-6011xA manufactured in
the year 2003 or 2004, including reworked brackets, installed in
accordance with paragraph (h)(2), (i)(2), or (n) of this AD, as
applicable: Do the actions specified in paragraphs (q)(1) and (q)(2)
of this AD in accordance with Parts A and B of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Shorts Alert Service Bulletin SD360-55-A21, Revision
1, dated March 29, 2007.
    (1) Within 30 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
or within 250 flight hours since installation of the balance weight
brackets of the elevator trim tabs or since the last inspection
required by paragraph (g), (h)(1), (i)(1), or (m) of this AD,
whichever occurs later: Do a dye penetrant inspection to detect
cracks of the balance weight brackets of the elevator trim tabs.
    (i) If no crack is detected, repeat the dye penetrant inspection
at intervals not to exceed 250 flight hours, until the replacement
required by paragraph (q)(2) of this AD is done.
    (ii) If any crack is detected, before further flight, do the
replacement specified in paragraph (q)(2) of this AD.
    (2) Before the accumulation of 1,750 flight hours since
installation of the balance weight brackets of the elevator trim
tabs, or within 180 days after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later: Replace the balance weight brackets with new
balance weight brackets manufactured in 2005 or later. Thereafter,
replace any balance weight bracket with a new bracket manufactured
in 2005 or later at intervals not to exceed the accumulation of
1,750 flight hours on that bracket. Accomplishment of the initial
replacement ends the repetitive inspection requirements of this AD.
    (r) For airplanes equipped with balance weight brackets of the
elevator trim tabs having part number SD3-31-6213xB inspected in
accordance with paragraph (g), (h)(1), or (i)(1) of this AD and
retained or refitted following approved repair in accordance with
paragraph (j) of this AD: Do the actions specified in paragraphs
(r)(1) and (r)(2) of this AD in accordance with Parts A and B of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Shorts Service Bulletin SD360-55-20,
Revision 2, dated March 29, 2007.
    (1) Within 4,800 flight hours since last inspection, or within
180 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 4,800 flight hours:
Do a dye penetrant inspection to detect cracks of the balance weight
brackets of the elevator trim tabs.
    (i) If no crack is detected, repeat the dye penetrant inspection
at intervals not to exceed 4,800 flight hours, until the replacement
required by paragraph (r)(2) of this AD is done.
    (ii) If any crack is detected, before further flight, do the
replacement specified in paragraph (r)(2) of this AD.
    (2) Before the accumulation of 28,800 flight hours since any
balance weight bracket of the elevator trim tabs is new, or within
180 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later: Replace the balance weight brackets with new balance weight
brackets manufactured in 2005 or later. Thereafter, replace any
balance weight bracket with a new bracket manufactured in 2005 or
later at intervals not to exceed the accumulation of 28,800 flight
hours on that bracket. Accomplishment of the initial replacement
ends the repetitive inspection requirements of this AD.

Part Installation

    (s) For all airplanes: As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install, on any airplane, a balance weight bracket of the
elevator trim tab manufactured earlier than 2005.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (t) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1175; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

Related Information

    (u) European Aviation Safety Agency emergency airworthiness
directive 2007-0107-E, dated April 18, 2007, also addresses the
subject of this AD.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (v) You must use the service bulletins specified in Table 1 of
this AD to perform the actions that are required by this AD, unless
the AD specifies otherwise.

                                   Table 1--Material Incorporated by Reference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Service Bulletin                       Revision level                           Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Short Brothers Alert Service Bulletin      Original........................  December 16, 2004.
 SD360-55-A21.
Short Brothers Service Bulletin SD360-55-  Original........................  June 26, 2003.
 20.
Shorts Alert Service Bulletin SD360-55-    Revision 1......................  March 29, 2007.
 A21.
Shorts Service Bulletin SD360-55-20......  Revision 1......................  June 20, 2005.

Shorts Service Bulletin SD360-55-20......  Revision 2......................  March 29, 2007.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of Shorts Alert Service Bulletin SD360-
55-A21, Revision 1, dated March 29, 2007; Shorts Service Bulletin
SD360-55-20, Revision 1, dated June 20, 2005; and Shorts Alert
Service Bulletin SD360-55-20, Revision 2, dated March 29, 2007; in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) On March 14, 2005 (70 FR 9212, February 25, 2005), the
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of Short Brothers Alert Service Bulletin SD360-55-A21,
dated December 16, 2004.
    (3) On August 3, 2004 (69 FR 38813, June 29, 2004), the Director
of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of
Short Brothers Service Bulletin SD360-55-20, dated June 26, 2003.
    (4) Contact Short Brothers, Airworthiness & Engineering Quality,
P.O. Box 241, Airport Road, Belfast BT3 9DZ, Northern Ireland, for a
copy of this service information. You may review copies at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-
register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 23, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-17744 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20494-20495]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08787]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0014; FRL-9925-44]

Product Cancellation Order for Certain Pesticide Registrations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's order for the cancellations,
voluntarily requested by the registrants and accepted by the Agency, of
the products listed in Table 1 of Unit III., pursuant to the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Any distribution,
sale, or use of the products subject to this cancellation order is
permitted only in accordance with the terms of this order, including
any existing stocks provisions.

DATES: The cancellations are effective April 16, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janeese Hackley, Pesticide Re-
Evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide
users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution,
or use of pesticides. Since others also may be interested, the Agency
has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be
affected by this action.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The docket for this action, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0014, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?

    Section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA (7 U.S.C. 136d(f)(1)) provides that a
registrant of a pesticide product may at any time request that any of
its pesticide registrations be canceled or amended to terminate one or
more uses. FIFRA further provides that, before acting on the request,
EPA must publish a notice of receipt of any such request in the Federal
Register. Thereafter, following the public comment period, the EPA
Administrator may approve such a request.

III. What action is the Agency taking?

    This notice announces the cancellation, as requested by
registrants, of products registered under FIFRA section 3 (7 U.S.C.
136a). These registrations are listed in sequence by registration
number in Table 1 of this unit.

                                         Table 1--Product Cancellations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      EPA registration No.              Product name                           Chemical name
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
060061-00139....................  Kop-Coat Cooper Treat    Copper carbonate, basic.
                                   80.
CA-050009.......................  Deadline Bullets.......  Metaldehyde.
CA-890001.......................  Durham Metaldehyde       Metaldehyde.
                                   Granules 7.5.
KY-100002.......................  Dual Magnum Herbicide..  S-Metolachlor.
KY-110032.......................  Ridomil Gold SL........  Metalaxyl-M.
MI-100003.......................  Scholar SC.............  Fludioxonil.
OR-030002.......................  Warrior Insecticide      Lambda-cyhalothrin.
                                   with Zeon Technology.
OR-060010.......................  Mocap EC Nematicide-     Ethoprop.
                                   Insecticide.
OR-060024.......................  Mocap EC Nematicide-     Ethoprop.
                                   Insecticide.
OR-080027.......................  Axiom DF Herbicide.....  Metribuzin and Flufenacet.
OR-090003.......................  Mocap EC Nematicide-     Ethoprop.
                                   Insecticide.
WA-000037.......................  Wakil XL...............  Fludioxonil, Metalaxyl-M and Cymoxanil.
WA-100007.......................  Graduate SC............  Fludioxonil.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Table 2 of this unit includes the names and addresses of record for
all registrants of the products in Table 1 of this unit, in sequence by
EPA company number. This number corresponds to the first part of the
EPA registration numbers of the products listed in Table 1 of this
unit.

               Table 2--Registrants of Cancelled Products
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            EPA company No.                  Company name and address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
60061..................................  Kop-Coat, Inc., 3020 William
                                          Pitt Way, Pittsburg, PA 15238.
CA-050009 and CA-890001................  Amvac Chemical Corporation,
                                          4695 MacArthur Court, Suite
                                          1200, Newport Beach, CA 92660-
                                          1706.
KY-100002, KY-110032, MI-100003, OR-     Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC,
 030002, WA-000037, WA-100007.            410 Swing Road, P.O. Box
                                          18300, Greensboro, NC 27419-
                                          8300.
OR-060010, OR-060024, OR-080027, OR-     Bayer CropScience LP, 2 T.W.
 090003.                                  Alexander Drive, P.O. Box
                                          12014, Research Triangle Park,
                                          NC 27709.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This cancellation order follows a notice of receipt of voluntary
cancellation requests received from the registrants that issued in the
Federal Register of June 11, 2014 (79 FR 33550) (FRL-9911-36)), and a
correction notice issued in the Federal Register of July 16, 2014 (79
FR 41551) (FRL-9913-20) that removed two products that were
inadvertently listed in the June 11, 2014 document. In the June 2014
document, EPA indicated that it would issue an order implementing the
cancellations, unless the Agency received substantive comments within
the 180-day comment period that would merit its further review of these
requests, or unless the registrants withdrew their requests.

IV. Summary of Public Comments Received and Agency Response to Comments

    The comment period closed on December 8, 2014. EPA received one
comment. The comment did not contain information about any specific
product cancellation request. For this reason, the Agency does not
believe that the comment submitted during the comment period merits
further review or a denial of the request for voluntary cancellation.
    Further, the registrants did not withdraw their requests.

V. Cancellation Order

    Pursuant to FIFRA section 6(f) (7 U.S.C. 136d(f)), EPA hereby
approves the requested cancellations of the registrations identified in
Table 1 of Unit III. Accordingly, the Agency hereby orders that the
product registrations identified in Table 1 of Unit III. are canceled.
The effective date of the cancellations that are the subject of this
order is April 16, 2015. Any distribution, sale, or use of existing
stocks of the products identified in Table 1 of Unit III. in a manner
inconsistent with any of the provisions for disposition of existing
stocks set forth in Unit VI. will be a violation of FIFRA.

VI. Provisions for Disposition of Existing Stocks

    Existing stocks are those stocks of registered pesticide products
which are currently in the United States and which were packaged,
labeled, and released for shipment prior to the effective date of the
cancellation action. The existing stocks provisions for the products
subject to this order are as follows.
    The registrants may continue to sell and distribute existing stocks
of products listed in Table 1 of Unit III. until April 18, 2016, which
is 1 year after the publication of the Cancellation Order in the
Federal Register. Thereafter, the registrants are prohibited from
selling or distributing products listed in Table 1 of Unit III. except
for export in accordance with FIFRA section 17 (7 U.S.C. 136o), or
proper disposal. Persons other than the registrants may sell,
distribute, or use existing stocks of products listed in Table 1 of
Unit III. until existing stocks are exhausted, provided that such sale,
distribution, or use is consistent with the terms of the previously
approved labeling on, or that accompanied, the canceled products.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: April 3, 2015.
Michael Goodis,
Acting Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-08787 Filed 4-15-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: February 2, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 20)]
[Notices]
[Page 5879-5880]
[DOCID:fr02fe09-88]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59302; File No. SR-NSCC-2008-12]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing
Corporation; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Allow the Transfer and Reregistration of Fund/SERV
Eligible Fund Positions to and From a Financial Intermediary and a
Mutual Fund Company

January 27, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on December 23, 2008, the
National Securities Clearing Corporation (``NSCC'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change described in Items I, II, and III below, which items have been
prepared primarily by NSCC. NSCC filed the proposal pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \2\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(4) \3\ thereunder so
that the proposal was effective upon filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the rule
change from interested parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The purpose of the rule change is to allow for transfer and
reregistration of Fund/SERV Eligible Fund positions to and from a
financial intermediary and a mutual fund company.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NSCC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. NSCC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A),
(B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of these
statements.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Commission has modified the text of the summaries
prepared by NSCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 (A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    Currently NSCC's rules permit the transfer of Fund/SERV eligible
shares from one member to another member through NSCC's Automated
Customer Account Transfer Service (``ACATS'') or from one fund member
to another fund member through the Transfer of Retirement Assets
(``ToRA'') service. In an effort to further standardize and automate
the account transfer and reregistration process between members and
mutual fund companies, NSCC is proposing to accommodate the transfer of
customer mutual fund share registration: (i) Held by a customer
directly at a mutual fund company to be reregistered in the name of a
financial intermediary and (ii) held by a financial intermediary to be
reregistered as a direct customer position at the mutual fund company.
A member can request the transfer of registration in the capacity of
the party receiving the reregistration or in the capacity of the party
transferring the registration. The contra-side NSCC fund member must
accept the reregistration request in order for NSCC to process it.
    NSCC is also proposing that, unless the parties agree otherwise,
the member and fund member will comply with certain legal
responsibilities associated with the reregistration. The member will
agree that in initiating the request it has obtained the requisite
authorization from the account holder and that it will provide a copy
of it to the fund member upon request. The member also will indemnify
the fund member for any liabilities incurred in or associated with the
request other than those relating to the negligence or misconduct of
the fund member. In connection with reregistrations of IRA and other
tax-deferred accounts, a member that makes the transfer request in its
capacity as a successor custodian agrees that it is so qualified under
the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. NSCC is also proposing
that the members will agree that any dispute between them relating to
these provisions will be resolved directly between them and that NSCC
is not a party to such dispute and has no responsibility with respect
to the enforcement or satisfaction of such provisions. In addition, the
submission or processing of a transfer transaction through NSCC will
not extinguish or otherwise affect any of the participants' legal
rights arising out of the transaction.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Similar provisions are contained in NSCC rules relating to
other mutual fund services. See, e.g., NSCC Rule 50, Section 17 and
NSCC Rule 52, Section 46.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 17A of the
Act,\6\ as amended, because it will reduce the likelihood of manual
processing errors, will lower costs, and will reduce the time needed to
complete the transfer of customer mutual fund share registrations,
thereby promoting the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of
reregistration of mutual fund share positions processed through NSCC's
Fund/SERV service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    NSCC does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any
impact or impose any burden on competition.

(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not yet
been solicited or received. NSCC will notify the Commission of any
written comments received by NSCC.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing proposed rule change has become effective upon filing
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(4) \8\ thereunder because the proposed rule change effects a
change in an existing service of a registered clearing agency that: (i)
Does not adversely affect the safeguarding of securities or funds in
the custody or control of the clearing agency or for which it is
responsible and (ii) does not significantly affect the respective
rights or obligations of the clearing agency or persons using the
service. At any time within sixty days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and

arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NSCC-2008-12 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Elizabeth
M. Murphy, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NSCC-2008-12. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filings also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of NSCC and on NSCC's
Web site at http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/rule_filings/2008/
nscc/2008-12.pdf. All comments received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NSCC-2008-12 and should be submitted on or before February 23, 2009.

    For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-2120 Filed 1-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 236 (Monday, December 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 85896-85897]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27123]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2023-0033; OMB No. 1660-NW171]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection,
Comment Request; Generic Clearance for FEMA's Collection of Feedback on
Customer Satisfaction and Disaster Recovery

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: 60-Day notice of new collection and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites
the general public to take this opportunity to comment on a new
information collection. In accordance with the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice seeks comments concerning
a generic clearance to collect feedback from applicants on service
delivery and their subsequent disaster recovery.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 9, 2024.

ADDRESSES: To avoid duplicate submissions to the docket, please submit
comments at www.regulations.gov under Docket ID FEMA-2023-0033. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
    All submissions received must include the agency name and Docket
ID. Regardless of the method used to submitting comments or material,
all submissions will be posted, without change, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov, and will include any
personal information you provide. Therefore, submitting this
information makes it public. You may wisht to read the Privacy and
Security Notice that is available via a link on the homepage of
www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Brooks, Statistician, FEMA's
Recovery Reporting and Analytics Division, Customer Survey and Analysis
Section, at<PHONE_NUMBER> or [email protected]. You may
contact the Information Management Division for copies of the proposed
collection of information at email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive Order 12862, ``Setting Customer
Service

Standards,'' requires that all Federal Agencies implement customer
service standards and provide services to the public that matches or
exceeds the best service available in the private sector. To accomplish
this, Federal Agencies are required to survey customers to determine
the kind and quality of services they want and their level of
satisfaction with existing services.
    The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 2010 also
requires quarterly performance assessments of Government programs for
purposes of assessing agency performance and improvement. One of the
primary goals of GPRA is to improve Federal program effectiveness and
public accountability by promoting a focus on results, service quality,
and customer satisfaction.
    The Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018
(``Evidence Act'') supports that data collection and analysis are
important inputs to be used as evidence for prioritizing agency efforts
to support civic engagement, delivering on mission, service, and
stewardship objectives, and supporting decision-making.
    FEMA seeks Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval for a
generic clearance to collect feedback from applicants on service
delivery and their subsequent disaster recovery. The Agency has
numerous touchpoints with applicants through several specialized
customer-facing programs. The feedback collected from applicants may be
quantitative or qualitative in nature depending on the population of
interest, specific research questions, and the types of required
analysis.

Collection of Information

    Title: Generic Clearance for FEMA's Collection of Feedback on
Customer Satisfaction and Disaster Recovery.
    Type of Information Collection: New information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-NW171.
    FEMA Forms: Not Applicable.
    Abstract: Federal Agencies are required to survey their customers
to determine the kind and quality of services they want and their level
of satisfaction with those services. In order for the Agency to
maintain customer service standards, there must be continuous
assessment of service delivery throughout all phases of the customer
journey. The Agency will collect, analyze, and interpret information
gathered from this generic clearance to identify strengths and
weaknesses with program delivery.
    Affected Public: Individuals and Households; State, Local or Tribal
Governments.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 389,770.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 389,770.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 69,135.
    Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost: $3,015,890.
    Estimated Respondents' Operation and Maintenance Costs: $0.
    Estimated Respondents' Capital and Start-Up Costs: $0.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost to the Federal Government: $2,769,361.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the Agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility;
evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

Millicent Brown Wilson,
Records Management Branch Chief, Office of the Chief Administrative
Officer, Mission Support, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2023-27123 Filed 12-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-24-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 107 (Monday, June 7, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30201-30203]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11769]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2020-0369; FRL-10024-65-Region 5]

Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Two Revised Sulfur Dioxide Rules for
Lake County

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving
revisions to the Indiana sulfur dioxide (SO2) State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The State of Indiana has requested these SIP
revisions to satisfy the requirements of a Federal consent decree.
These revisions limit annual bypass venting limits in the sulfur-
containing waste gas emissions from a coking and power generating
facility in Lake County, Indiana, which is owned and operated by
Indiana Harbor Coke Company (IHCC) and Cokenergy LLC (Cokenergy). The
revisions also require Cokenergy to operate and maintain a permanent
SO2 flow rate monitor and improve the percent control
capture efficiency of the facility. In addition, the rulemaking
includes technical corrections and clarifications that do not have a
substantive effect of the application of the rules.

DATES: This final rule is effective on July 7, 2021.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2020-0369. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.

Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either through
www.regulations.gov or at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region
5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays and facility closures
due to COVID-19. We recommend that you telephone Andrew Lee, Physical
Scientist, at<PHONE_NUMBER> before visiting the Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Lee, Physical Scientist,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.

I. Background Information

    On February 11, 2021, EPA proposed to approve revisions to 326
Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 7-4.1-7 (Cokenergy) and 326 IAC 7-
4.1-8 (IHCC) to limit annual bypass venting of sulfur containing waste
gases from a coking and power generating facility owned and operated by
Indiana Harbor Coke Company and Cokenergy LLC in Lake County, Indiana.
See 86 FR 9038. The proposed revision for Cokenergy also requires it to
operate and maintain a permanent SO2 flow rate monitor at
the facility. The state of Indiana has requested these SIP revisions to
satisfy the requirements of a Federal consent decree. An explanation of
the Clean Air Act requirements, a detailed analysis of the revisions,
and EPA's reasons for proposing approval were provided in the notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) and will not be restated here.

II. Public Comments

    EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period for the February
11, 2021, proposed rule. The comment period ended on March 15, 2021.
EPA received a total of three comments, all from private citizens, on
the proposed approval of this rule. Two comments were in support of the
action and one comment was adverse. No further discussion of the
supporting comments is necessary. EPA summarizes and responds to the
adverse comment below.
    Comment: This rule should be more restricting on the harmful gases
that are released into the atmosphere. The 19% of coke waste that is
pumped into our atmosphere 24 hours a day should be cut by at least 2%
for the year 2021. The option for retubing defeats the new revision
because it allows the company to continue to let a maximum of 14%
rather than the proposed 13%.
    Response: The provision relating to 19% of the coke oven waste
gases leaving the common tunnel was not reopened by our proposal and is
not being revised by this rulemaking. As per the consent decree,
Indiana was not required to amend the facility's maximum percentage of
coke oven gases leaving the common tunnel that can be vented into the
atmosphere. Indiana has retained the original limit which was adopted
to be protective of the previous SO2 standard. See 70 FR
56129. No one timely challenged that previous determination and it is
too late to raise an objection now. As such, this portion of the
comment is outside of the scope of this action.
    In addition, the commentor raised a concern over the increase in
bypass venting allowed during a ``retubing year.'' This term is defined
in the proposed revision as a year in which there is a replacement of:
(1) Waterwalls, evaporator tubes, economizer tubes, or superheater
module pendants within the heat recovery steam generator; and (2)
exterior casing, insulation, and refractory, as needed. To comply with
the consent decree, IHCC and Cokenergy submitted to Indiana a request
to lower the facility's maximum bypass venting to 13%, down from
previously allowed 14%, except during a heat recovery steam generator
(HRSG) retubing year. During a retubing year, the facility is allowed
increase the bypass venting back up to the previously permissible
maximum of 14% when at least 3.25% of the bypass venting is due to the
HRSG retubing. In any year, one or more HRSGs may be brought offline to
replace parts that are prone to wear due to operating at extreme
temperatures. The need to increase bypass venting arises from the fact
that the facility is unable to construct redundant HRSGs that could
accept the waste gas stream when the primary HRSG is offline. As such,
when a HRSG is offline due to retubing, the facility will need to
divert a higher percentage of the gas stream to the atmosphere through
bypass venting. This provision allows the facility to preserve its
pollution control devices located downstream that cannot handle the
high temperature of the gas stream that does not first go through a
HRSG. EPA agrees with this technical justification for the need to
allow increase bypass venting during a retubing year to the previously
permissible 14%. Overall, this revision will lower the percentage of
coke oven gases that are vented to the atmosphere via bypass venting.

III. Final Action

    EPA is approving Indiana's July 10, 2020 request to revise 326 IAC
7-4.1-7 and 326 IAC 7-4.1-8. These SO2 SIP revisions
strengthen the SIP and fulfill the requirements of the Federal consent
decree with Cokenergy LLC and IHCC.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Indiana
Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
generally available through www.regulations.gov, and at the EPA Region
5 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in
the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan, are
fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of
the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and will
be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP
compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);

     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 6, 2021. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Sulfur oxides.

    Dated: June 1, 2021.
Cheryl Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA amends title 40 CFR
part 52 as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  52.770, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entries for ``7-4.1-7'' and ``7-4.1-8'' under the heading ``Rule
4.1. Lake County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations'' to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.770   Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                        EPA-Approved Indiana Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Indiana
      Indiana  citation                Subject             effective        EPA approval date          Notes
                                                             date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            Rule 4.1. Lake County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
7-4.1-7.....................  Cokenergy LLC sulfur           8/24/2020  6/7/2021, [INSERT         ..............
                               dioxide emission                          Federal Register
                               limitations.                              CITATION].
7-4.1-8.....................  Indiana Harbor Coke            8/24/2020  6/7/2021, [INSERT         ..............
                               Company sulfur dioxide                    Federal Register
                               emission limitations.                     CITATION].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-11769 Filed 6-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24197-24198]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9658]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP12-115-000]

Trunkline Gas Company, LLC; Notice of Request Under Blanket
Authorization

    Take notice that on April 5, 2012, Trunkline Gas Company, LLC
(Trunkline), P.O. Box 4967, Houston, Texas 77210-4967, filed in Docket
No. CP12-115-000, a Request for Authorization Under Blanket Certificate
Prior Notice Procedures pursuant to sections 157.205, 157.208(b),
157.213(b) and 157.216(b)(2) of the Commission's Regulations under the
Natural Gas Act (NGA) as amended, for authorization to abandon thirteen
injection/withdrawal (I/W) wells, convert three I/W wells to
observation wells and abandon two compressor units, all located in West
and East Carroll Parishes, Louisiana, all as more fully set forth in
the application which is on file with the Commission and open to public
inspection. The filing may also be viewed on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to
Stephen Veatch, Senior Director of Certificates & Tariffs, Trunkline
Gas Company, LLC, 5051 Westheimer Road, Houston, Texas 77056; at
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 60 days after
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of
the regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to the
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and
not withdrawn within 30 days after the allowed time for filing a
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the NGA.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenter's will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenter's will not be required to serve copies of filed

documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentary, will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426.

    Dated: April 16, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9658 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P