                 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                              LETTER PEER REVIEW

                                      of

2023 White Paper on the Quantitative Human Health Approach to be Applied in the Risk Evaluation for Asbestos Part 2 under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)

             List of Candidates (including Biographical Sketches)

                     Docket Number: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2023-0309

NOTE: This list of candidates includes all interested and available nominees under consideration after EPA's screening based on the selection criteria in the Federal Register of June 22, 2023, (88 FR 40819). From this list, EPA will make final selections of five to eight letter peer reviewers to review the "2023 White Paper on the Quantitative Human Health Approach to be Applied in the Risk Evaluation for Asbestos Part 2 under the TSCA."

Public comments must be submitted through regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not electronically submit any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Copyrighted material will not be posted without explicit permission of the copyright holder. Members of the public should also be aware that personal contact information, if included in any written comments, may be posted on the internet.

                             Henry A. Anderson, MD

Affiliation: Adjunct professor, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin

Expertise: Research and programmatic expertise in public health; preventive, environmental, and occupational medicine; occupational and environmental human health and exposure epidemiology; human health risk assessment; regulatory risk assessment; agent-specific focus on Asbestos, Silica, Persistent Organic Pollutants

Education: MD, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; BA, Stanford University, Stanford, California

Experience Summary: Dr. Henry Anderson, retired after 35 years, from positions as Wisconsin State Environmental and Occupational Disease Epidemiologist, and Chief Medical Officer in the Wisconsin Division of Public Health, Department of Health Services. He has served two appointments as State Health Official; a position appointed by the Governor of the State of Wisconsin. His duties included oversight of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) program. He is board-certified by the American Board of Preventive Medicine with a sub-specialty in Occupational and Environmental Medicine and is a fellow of the American College of Epidemiology. Dr. Anderson has published over 300 articles. His primary research interests include disease and exposure surveillance systems, cancer and chronic disease epidemiology, reproductive and endocrine health hazards, drinking water contaminants, pesticides, and dietary risk assessment, including sport fish consumption advisory communication. Dr. Anderson began his specialization in studying asbestos exposure and disease in 1972.

                       Robert S. Herrick, ScD, MS, CIH

Affiliation: Retired, formerly Senior Lecturer, Harvard University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

Expertise: Occupational and environmental exposure assessment

Education: ScD, Environmental Health Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge,
Massachusetts; MS, Environmental Health Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,
Michigan; BA, Chemistry, College of Wooster, Wooster, Ohio

Experience Summary: Dr. Robert Herrick is a retired faculty member from the Harvard University School of Public Health (1994 to 2018). In this position, Dr. Herrick conducted research and taught courses on exposure assessment and control of chemicals in the workplace and the general environment. Prior to joining the faculty at Harvard University, he was a researcher on occupational exposures at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (1977 to 1994). His workshop activities included the planning committee for the Tenth Surgeon General's Conference on Agricultural Safety and Health (1990 to 1993); planning committee for the International Conference on Retrospective Exposure Assessment in Occupational Epidemiology (1994); planning committee for the International Conference on Methodological Challenges to the Study of Occupational Injury  -  An International Epidemiology Workshop (1996); working group to prepare International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monograph on some non-heterocyclic polycyclic hydrocarbons and some related industrial exposures (2005); and Chair, organizing committee for conference: Innovations in Exposure Assessment (2009). Dr. Herrick's primary research interest was exposure assessment for epidemiologic studies.

                           Michael A. Jayjock, PhD

Affiliation: Sole Proprietor of Jayjock Associates, LLC, Langhorne, Pennsylvania

Expertise: Human health exposure and risk assessment; exposure modeling; dose-response modeling

Education: PhD and MS, Environmental Engineering, Drexel University,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; BS, Secondary Education, Penn State University, State
College, Pennsylvania

Experience Summary: Dr. Michael Jayjock is an independent consultant who retired as a Senior Research Fellow from the Rohm and Haas Company where he worked for 35 years. During his employment at Rohm and Haas, his responsibilities included the development and management of all aspects of exposure assessment and mathematical modeling projects in the service of product safety. Dr. Jayjock is a consultant to Fortune 500 companies and government agencies including Health Canada, the European Commission, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). He is a Fellow of the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and Certified by the American Board of Industrial Hygienists (ABIH) as a Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH). He is active in various committees of the AIHA and in the publication of his research. His primary research interest includes exposure modeling of human exposure to chemicals.

                             Marty S. Kanarek, PhD

Affiliation: Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health and Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, Madison, Wisconsin

Expertise: Environmental epidemiology

Education: PhD, Epidemiology, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California;
MPH, Environmental Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; BA,
Biology, Grinnell College, Grinnell, Iowa

Experience Summary: Dr. Marty Kanarek has been a Professor of Environmental Epidemiology for 40 years. Dr. Kanarek's research focuses on environmental pollutants such as polychlorinated biphenyls, lead, mercury, asbestos, and several other chemicals. He has published widely on the epidemiology of asbestos and mesothelioma. He is a Fellow in the American College of Epidemiology.

                        Dennis J. Paustenbach, PhD, DABT

Affiliation: President and Chief Scientist, Paustenbach and Associates, Jackson, Wyoming

Expertise: Environmental and occupational toxicology; industrial hygiene; exposure science; risk assessment; chemical engineering

Education: PhD, Environmental Toxicology, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana;
Post-Doctoral Research (in absentia), Pharmacokinetics, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio; MS, Counseling Psychology, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Indiana; MS, Industrial Hygiene (minor: toxicology); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; BSChE, Chemical Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, Indiana

Experience Summary: Dr. Paustenbach worked for almost ten years as an engineer, industrial hygienist, toxicologist, and risk assessor in the private sector (pharmaceutical and chemical companies).  He then entered the field of consulting in about 1988 when he became President of ChemRisk; a firm that he founded. This became one of the largest risk assessment and applied toxicology consulting firms for approximately 20 years. This group undertook over 1,000 different projects involving chemicals or radionuclides in soil, food, sediment, consumer products, the workplace, groundwater, ambient air, and other media. He has served on many different science advisory boards over the past 35 years. Dr. Paustenbach, has more than 300 peer-reviewed publications, has authored 50 book chapters, and has published three editions of his textbook on risk assessment.

                   David C. Roskelley, MSPH, CIH, CSP, FAIHA

Affiliation: President of R&R Environmental, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah; Adjunct Faculty at the University of Utah, Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health (RMCOEH)

Expertise: Industrial hygiene; occupational safety; asbestos

Education: MSPH, Public Health, University of Utah, RMCOEH;
BS (with emphasis in communications and premedical), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

Experience Summary: Mr. David Roskelley has a master's degree in Public Health with an emphasis in Industrial Hygiene from the University of Utah/Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health (RMCOEH) and currently teaches as an adjunct faculty member (1997 to present, 26 years). Mr. Roskelley' s master's research was titled "The Historic Aspects of Asbestos Sampling," which compared the physical and chemical analysis method (P&CAM) 239 and current National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 7400 methods of asbestos sample analysis.  He has owned a comprehensive asbestos consulting firm for the past 26 years and has worked in the field for over 35 years. Mr. Roskelley is a Board Certified Safety Professional (CSP) as well as a Board Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH). He served as Chair of the American Board of Industrial Hygiene (ABIH) (2013 to 2018) and has previously served on the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Board as a Director (2009 to 2012). Mr. Roskelley is founding partner of R&R Environmental, Inc. a comprehensive safety, health, and environmental consulting firm based in Sandy, Utah (1997 to Current). Most recently, Mr. Roskelley was recognized for extraordinary contributions to the industrial hygiene profession and awarded the distinguished title of "Fellow" by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (2019). He co-authored Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 7th edition, The Evolution of Occupational and Industrial Hygiene as a Profession, chapter 2 (ISBN: 978-1-935082-15-6), 2019.

                           Emanuela Taioli, MD, PhD

Affiliation: Director, Institute for Translational Epidemiology at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Associate Director, Population Science, Tisch Cancer Institute at Mount Sinai, New York, New York;  Program Co-Director, Cancer Prevention & Control, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York

Expertise: Cancer epidemiology; environmental carcinogens; cancer and nutrition, and genetic susceptibility to cancer; genetic susceptibility to environmental exposure; cancer survivorship; health disparity; access to care in minorities; and chronic diseases prevention

Education: MD, University of Milan, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy; MS, Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, New York; MS, Philosophy, Columbia University, New York, New York; PhD in Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, New York

Experience Summary: Dr. Emanuela Taioli is the Director of the Institute for Translational Epidemiology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. She has conducted extensive research on cancer occurrence in the World Trade Center cohort. As Associate Director of Population Science, Dr. Taioli oversees the epidemiological, behavioral and health service research activities of the Tisch Cancer Institute at Mount Sinai. Dr. Taioli also co-leads the Cancer Prevention and Control Program of the Tisch Cancer Institute at Mount Sinai. Among her most important contributions are those to the field of cancer prevention, including the study of cancer risk factors in healthy populations, cancer predisposing factors, hormone metabolism and genetic susceptibility to environmental exposure. She is a well-recognized expert in cancer survivorship and the effect of lifestyles changes on the risk for cancer recurrence and the development of secondary cancers. She has worked extensively on health disparities, access to care and chronic disease prevention in minority populations. She is a Scientific Board Member of the Mesothelioma Foundation, and has been a Member, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Mesothelioma Task Force.

                             Haining Yang, MD, PhD

Affiliation: Professor (Researcher), University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii

Expertise: Mesothelioma; Carcinogenesis of asbestos and other carcinogenic mineral fibers

Education: MD, Shandong Medical University, Jinan, China; PhD, Shandong University, China

Experience Summary: Dr. Haining Yang, is a Tenured Professor at the University of Hawai'i Cancer Center. Dr. Yang's research work focuses on the pathogenesis of mesothelioma, a malignancy often related to exposure to asbestos or other carcinogenic mineral fibers. She has been studying mesothelioma, in particular how asbestos and other carcinogenic fibers cause malignant mesothelioma since 2003. Her research goal is to find novel strategies for mesothelioma early detection, prevention, and therapy. During her years of study, Dr. Yang has discovered some key mechanisms of asbestos-induced carcinogenesis. Dr. Yang's research is funded by the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and the Department of Defense. The results of her work have been published in high-ranked journals, including Nature, Nature Genetics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), Nature Reviews Cancer, Cancer Discovery, Cancer Research, Journal of Thoracic Oncology etc. Dr. Yang was awarded European Union Marie Curie Scholarship from the European Commission Marie Curie Actions Program in 2005, and she was one of the recipients of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Innovative Landon Award for International Collaboration in Cancer Research in 2008, she received the iMig (International Mesothelioma Interest Group) Research award in 2018.


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 23, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 83947-83949]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28390]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP20-52-000; CP20-52-001]

WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Availability of the
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed North Bakken Expansion
Project

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for the North
Bakken Expansion Project proposed by WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. (WBI
Energy) in the above-referenced docket. WBI Energy requests
authorization to construct, modify, operate, and maintain a new natural
gas pipeline and associated facilities in McKenzie, Williams,
Mountrail, and Burke Counties, North Dakota to transport up to 250,000
million cubic feet per day of natural gas from the Williston Basin in
northwest North Dakota to a new interconnect with Northern Border
Pipeline Company's existing mainline. The proposed facilities are
collectively known as the North Bakken Expansion Project (Project).
    The EA assesses the potential environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the Project in accordance with the
requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The FERC
staff concludes that approval of the proposed Project, with appropriate
mitigating measures, would not constitute a major federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the U.S. Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) participated as
cooperating agencies in the preparation

of this EA. Cooperating agencies have jurisdiction by law or special
expertise with respect to resources potentially affected by WBI
Energy's proposal and participate in the NEPA analysis. The USACE will
use the EA and supporting documentation to consider the issuance of
Clean Water Act Section 404, Section 408, and Rivers and Harbors Act
Section 10 permits. The Project would also cross lands administered by
the USACE and USFS. While the BLM does not have any BLM-administered
lands identified as part of the proposed route alignment for this
Project, the BLM will use the EA, along with other supporting
documentation, in coordination with the USACE and USFS, in the issuance
of a Mineral Leasing Act (MLA) right-of-way grant over federally
administered lands (USACE and USFS). Although the cooperating agencies
provided input to the conclusions and recommendations presented in the
EA, the agencies will present their own conclusions and recommendations
in their respective decision process for the Project.
    The proposed North Bakken Expansion Project includes the following
facilities in North Dakota:
     62.8 miles of new 24-inch-diameter pipeline from WBI
Energy's Tioga Compressor Station in Williams County to the proposed
Elkhorn Creek Compressor Station in McKenzie County;
     0.3 mile of new 24-inch-diameter pipeline between the
proposed Elkhorn Creek Compressor Station and Northern Border Pipeline
Company in McKenzie County;
     20.3 miles of new 12-inch-diameter pipeline looping along
WBI Energy's existing Line Section 25 between the Tioga Compressor
Station and the proposed Norse Transfer Station in Burke County; \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ A pipeline loop is a segment of pipe constructed parallel to
an existing pipeline to increase capacity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     replacement of the existing 0.1 mile 6-inch-diameter
Stoneview-Conoco Lateral with 0.1 mile of 8-inch-diameter natural gas
pipeline from Line Section 25 to the proposed Norse Transfer Station in
Burke County.
     9.6 miles of new 12-inch-diameter natural gas pipeline
looping along WBI Energy's Line Section 30 between the Nesson Valve
Setting and the Tioga Compressor Station in Williams County;
     0.5 mile of new 20-inch-diameter natural gas pipeline
between the new Tioga Plant Receipt Station and new facilities at the
Tioga Compressor Station in Williams County;
     uprates to WBI Energy's Line Section 25 in Burke County;
     one new 3,750 horsepower compressor station (Elkhorn Creek
Compressor Station) in McKenzie County and the addition of 11,250
horsepower at the existing Tioga Compressor Station in Williams County;
     new, and modifications to, existing delivery, receipt, and
transfer stations along WBI Energy's pipeline routes in Burke,
McKenzie, Mountrail, and Williams Counties; and
     replacement of small segments of pipeline facilities and
installation of block valves, pig \2\ launcher/receiver stations, and
associated appurtenances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ A pipeline pig is a device used to clean or inspect the
pipeline. A pig launcher/receiver is an aboveground facility where
pigs are inserted or retrieved from the pipeline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission mailed a copy of the Notice of Availability to
federal, state, and local government representatives and agencies;
elected officials; environmental and public interest groups; Native
American tribes; potentially affected landowners, and local libraries
and newspapers. The EA is only available in electronic format. It may
be viewed and downloaded from FERC's website (www.ferc.gov) on the
natural gas environmental documents page (https://www.ferc.gov/industries-data/natural-gas/environmental-document). In addition, the
EA may be accessed by using the eLibrary link on FERC's website. Click
on the eLibrary link (https://www.ferc.gov/ferc-online/elibrary),
select General Search and enter the docket number in the Docket Number
field (i.e., CP20-52). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date
range. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The EA is not a decision document. It presents Commission staff's
independent analysis of the environmental issues for the Commission to
consider when addressing the merits of all issues in this proceeding.
Any person wishing to comment on the EA may do so. Your comments should
focus on the EA's disclosure and discussion of potential environmental
effects, reasonable alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen
environmental impacts. The more specific your comments, the more useful
they will be. To ensure that the Commission has the opportunity to
consider your comments prior to making its decision on this Project, it
is important that we receive your comments in Washington, DC on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 19, 2021.
    For your convenience, there are three methods you can use to file
your comments to the Commission. The Commission encourages electronic
filing of comments and has staff available to assist you at (866) 208-
3676 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please carefully follow these
instructions so that your comments are properly recorded.
    (1) You can file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature on the Commission's website (www.ferc.gov) under the link FERC
Online. This is an easy method for submitting brief, text-only comments
on a project;
    (2) You can also file your comments electronically using the
eFiling feature on the Commission's website (www.ferc.gov) under the
link to FERC Online. With eFiling, you can provide comments in a
variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your submission.
New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking on
eRegister. You must select the type of filing you are making. If you
are filing a comment on a particular project, please select Comment on
a Filing; or
    (3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the Commission. Be sure to reference the project docket number (CP20-
52-000) on your letter. Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service
must be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC
20426. Submissions sent via any other carrier must be addressed to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

Filing environmental comments will not give you intervenor status, but
you do not need intervenor status to have your comments considered.
Only intervenors have the right to seek rehearing or judicial review of
the Commission's decision. At this point in this proceeding, the
timeframe for filing timely intervention requests has expired. Any
person seeking to become a party to the proceeding must file a motion
to intervene out-of-time pursuant to Rule 214(b)(3) and (d) of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedures (18 CFR 385.214(b)(3) and
(d)) and show good cause why the time limitation should be waived.
Motions to intervene are more fully described at https://www.ferc.gov/ferc-online/ferc-online/how-guides.
    Additional information about the Project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs,

at (866) 208-FERC, or on the FERC website (www.ferc.gov) using the
eLibrary link. The eLibrary link also provides access to the texts of
all formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders, notices,
and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. Go to https://www.ferc.gov/ferc-online/overview to
register for eSubscription.

    Dated: December 17, 2020.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-28390 Filed 12-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8299-8301]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03106]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RD14-13-000]

Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-725F); Comment
Request; Extension

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of information collection and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.

3507(a)(1)(D), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or
FERC) is soliciting public comment on the currently approved
information collection, FERC-725F (Mandatory Reliability Standard for
Nuclear Plant Interface Coordination: Reliability Standard NUC-001-3),
as modified in this docket. The Commission previously published a
notice in the Federal Register (79 FR 69450, 11/21/2014) requesting
public comments. The Commission received no comments and is making this
notation in its submittal to OMB.

DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due March 19,
2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments (identified by Docket No. RD14-13-
000) by either of the following methods:
     eFiling at Commission's Web site: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp.
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Instructions: All submissions must be formatted and filed in
accordance with submission guidelines at: http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp. For user assistance, contact FERC Online Support
by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by phone at:<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll-free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> for TTY.
    Docket: Users interested in receiving automatic notification of
activity in this docket or in viewing/downloading comments and
issuances in this docket may do so at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/docs-filing.asp.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, and fax at (202)
273-0873.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: FERC-725F (Mandatory Reliability Standard for Nuclear Plant
Interface Coordination: Reliability Standard NUC-001-3).
    OMB Control No.: 1902-0249.
    Type of Request: Three-year extension of the FERC-725F information
collection requirements.
    Abstract: The Commission requires the information collected by the
FERC-725F to implement the statutory provisions of section 215 of the
Federal Power Act (FPA).\1\ On August 8, 2005, the Electricity
Modernization Act of 2005, which is Title XII, Subtitle A, of the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005), was enacted into law.\2\ EPAct
2005 added a new section 215 to the FPA, which required a Commission-
certified Electric Reliability Organization (ERO) to develop mandatory
and enforceable Reliability Standards, which are subject to Commission
review and approval. Once approved, the Reliability Standards may be
enforced by the ERO subject to Commission oversight, or the Commission
can independently enforce Reliability Standards.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 16 U.S.C. 824o (2012).
    \2\ Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109-58, Title XII,
Subtitle A, 119 Stat. 594, 941 (2005), 16 U.S.C. 824o.
    \3\ 16 U.S.C. 824o(e)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On February 3, 2006, the Commission issued Order No. 672,
implementing section 215 of the FPA.\4\ Pursuant to Order No. 672, the
Commission certified one organization, the North American Electric
Reliability Corporation (NERC), as the ERO. The Reliability Standards
developed by the ERO and approved by the Commission apply to users,
owners and operators of the Bulk-Power System as set forth in each
Reliability Standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Rules Concerning Certification of the Electric Reliability
Organization; and Procedures for the Establishment, Approval, and
Enforcement of Electric Reliability Standards, Order No. 672, FERC
Stats. & Regs. ] 31,204, order on reh'g, Order No. 672-A, FERC
Stats. & Regs. ] 31,212 (2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 19, 2007, NERC filed its petition for Commission
approval of the Nuclear Plant Interface Coordination Reliability
Standard, designated NUC-001-1. In Order No. 716 the Commission
approved the standard while also directing certain revisions.\5\
Reliability Standard, NUC-001-2, was approved by the Commission on
January 21, 2010.\6\ Revised Reliability Standard NUC-001-3 was filed
with the Commission by NERC on September 15, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Mandatory Reliability Standard for Nuclear Plant Interface
Coordination, Order No. 716, 125 FERC ] 61,065, at P 189 & n.90
(2008), order on reh'g, Order No. 716-A, 126 FERC ] 61,122 (2009).
    \6\ North American Electric Reliability Corporation, 130 FERC ]
61,051 (2010). When the revised Reliability Standard was approved
the Commission, it did not go to OMB for approval. It is assumed
that the changes made did not substantively affect the information
collection, and therefore a formal submission to OMB was not needed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of Reliability Standard NUC-001-3 is to require
``coordination between nuclear plant generator operators and
transmission entities for the purpose of ensuring nuclear plant safe
operation and shutdown.'' \7\ Reliability Standard NUC-001-3 applies to
nuclear plant generator operators (generally nuclear power plant owners
and operators, including licensees of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission) and ``transmission entities,'' defined in the Reliability
Standard as including a nuclear plant's suppliers of off-site power and
related transmission and distribution services. Reliability Standard
NUC-001-3 requires a nuclear power plant operator and its suppliers of
back-up power and related transmission and distribution services to
coordinate concerning nuclear licensing requirements for safe nuclear
plant operation and shutdown and system operating limits. Information
collection requirements include establishing and maintaining interface
agreements, including record retention requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Reliability Standard NUC-001-3, available at http://www.nerc.com/files/NUC-001-3.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Type of Respondents: Nuclear power plant owners, operators, and
transmission entities
    Estimate of Annual Burden: \8\ The Commission estimates for the
annual public reporting burden for the Reliability Standard NUC-001-3
are unchanged from the estimates in the public notices issued for
Reliability Standard NUC-001-2 on 10/30/2014 \9\ and 1/28/2015 \10\ in
Docket No. IC14-16-000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The Commission defines burden as the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain,
retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal
agency. 5 CFR 1320.3 (2014) (explaining what is included in the
information collection burden).
    \9\ 79 FR 61068 (10/9/2014).
    \10\ 80 FR 6067 (2/4/2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Reliability Standard NUC-001-3 represents the implementation of
recommendations made by the NERC Five Year Review Team to revise
Reliability Standard NUC-001-2. These recommendations include
clarifying and conforming changes to update the standard for current
use of terminology implemented in other areas of the Reliability
Standards, as well as updated violation risk factors and violation
severity levels for the evaluation of violations of the Reliability
Standard. The burden of complying with the requirements under
Reliability Standard NUC-001-3 will not change because the changes from
the previous Reliability Standard NUC-001-2 are substantially
administrative in nature.
    Comments: Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden and
cost of the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information collection; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of

the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.

    Dated: February 9, 2015.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-03106 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27663-27666]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11472]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0502; Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-097-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Aeronautical Accessories, Inc. High
Landing Gear Forward Crosstube Assembly

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Aeronautical Accessories, Inc. (AAI) high landing gear forward
crosstube assemblies (crosstubes) installed on Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta)
Model AB412 and AB412EP; and Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. (Bell) Model
205A, 205A-1, 205B, 212, 412, 412CF, and 412EP helicopters during
production or based on a supplemental type certificate (STC). This
proposed AD is prompted by two reports from the field of failed
crosstubes. The proposed actions are intended to prevent failure of a
crosstube, collapse of the landing gear, and subsequent loss of control
of the helicopter.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 10, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Examining the AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket
Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the
economic evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations Office (telephone 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Aeronautical Accessories, Inc., P.O. Box 3689, Bristol, TN 37625-3689,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, or at
http://www.aero-access.com. You may review a copy of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas
76137.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Kohner, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Rotorcraft Certification Office, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to
the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might
result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed
electronically, commenters should submit only one time.
    We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as
a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we
will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed after the comment period has
closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay.
We may change this proposal in light of the comments we receive.

Discussion

    We propose to adopt a new AD for AAI crosstubes, part number (P/N)
212-321-103, installed on Agusta Model AB412 and AB412EP helicopters,
and Bell Model 205A, 205A-1, 205B, 212, 412, 412CF, and 412EP
helicopters, during production or under STC SR01052AT. This proposal
would require creating a component history card or equivalent record,
determining the total number of landings, and continuing recording the
number of landings for each crosstube. This proposal would also require
certain recurring visual, dimensional, and fluorescent penetrant
inspections of each crosstube. This proposal would require repairing
damaged crosstubes that are within acceptable limits. If there is a
crack, or any corrosion or a nick, scratch, dent, or any other damage
outside the maximum repair damage limits, this proposal requires,
before further flight, replacing any unairworthy crosstube with an
airworthy crosstube. This proposal is prompted by two reports from the
field of failed crosstubes. This condition, if not corrected, could
result in collapse of the landing gear, and subsequent loss of control
of the helicopter.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all known relevant
information and determined that an unsafe condition is likely to exist
or develop on other products of the same type design.

Related Service Information

    We reviewed AAI Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. AA-08055, Revision
B, dated August 12, 2009, which specifies establishing a takeoff/
landing history, recurrent visual and fluorescent penetrant inspections
of the crosstubes, and dimensional inspections of the skid gear. We
have also reviewed AAI Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA)
for Crosstubes, Report No. AA-01136, Revision K, dated February 15,
2012, which contain the information necessary for inspection and
maintenance of each crosstube installed on the Agusta and Bell
helicopters.

Proposed AD Requirements

    The proposed AD would require:
     Within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS), creating a
component history card or equivalent record for each affected
crosstube, and determining and recording the total number of landings.
If the landing information is unavailable, estimating the number by
multiplying the airframe hours TIS by a factor of 10. Continue to count
and record the number of landings for each crosstube. For the purposes
of this AD, a landing would be counted anytime the helicopter lifts off
into the air and then lands again with any further reduction of the
collective after the landing gear touches the ground.
     At specified intervals, using a 10X or higher magnifying
glass and a strong light, inspecting each crosstube for a crack. If
there is a crack, replacing the crosstube with an airworthy crosstube.
     At specified intervals, determining the horizontal
deflection of each crosstube from the centerline of the helicopter (BL
0.0) to the outside of the skid tubes. If the crosstube measures
outside the limits, replacing the crosstube with an airworthy
crosstube.
     At specified intervals, removing each crosstube and
performing a fluorescent penetrant inspection of each crosstube for a
crack, any corrosion, a nick, scratch, dent, or any other damage. If
there is a crack, replacing the crosstube with an airworthy crosstube.
If there is any corrosion or a nick, scratch, dent, or any other damage
repairing the crosstube to an airworthy configuration if the damage is
within the maximum damage limits, or replacing with an airworthy
crosstube.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information

    The service information uses the term ``flight hours.'' We use
``hours time-in-service.''

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 115 helicopters of
U.S. Registry.
    We estimate that operators may incur the following costs in order
to comply with this AD:
     Creating a historical record and determining the number of
landings would require .5 work hour at an average labor rate of $85 per
hour for a cost per helicopter of $42 and a cost to the U.S. operator
fleet of $4,830 per inspection cycle.
     Preparing and inspecting the crosstube would require 8.5
work hours at an average labor rate of $85 per hour for a cost per
helicopter of $722 and a cost to the U.S. operator fleet of $83,030 per
inspection cycle.
     Performing the dimensional inspection of the skid gear
would require 1 work hour at an average labor rate of $85 per hour for
a cost per helicopter of $85 and a cost to the U.S. operator fleet of
$9,775 per inspection cycle.
     Fluorescent penetrant inspecting the crosstube would
require 24 work

hours at an average labor rate of $85 per hour for a cost per
helicopter of $2,040 and a cost to the U.S. operator fleet of $234,600
per inspection cycle.
     If required, replacing a crosstube with an airworthy
crosstube would require 10 work hours at an average labor rate of $85,
required parts will cost $9,315, for a cost per helicopter of $10,165.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):

Aeronautical Accessories, Inc. (AAI): Docket No. FAA-2012-0502;
Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-097-AD.

(a) Applicability

    This AD applies to high landing gear forward crosstube assembly
(crosstube), part number (P/N) 212-321-103, installed on Agusta
S.p.A. Model AB412 and AB412EP and Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.
Model 205A, 205A-1, 205B, 212, 412, 412CF, and 412EP helicopters,
certificated in any category.

(b) Unsafe Condition

    This AD defines the unsafe condition as failure of the landing
gear crosstube which could result in collapse of the landing gear
and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

(c) Compliance

    You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.

(d) Required Actions

    (1) Within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the effective
date of this AD:
    (i) Create a component history card or equivalent record for the
crosstube by following the Accomplishment Instructions, Part A,
paragraph 1., of AAI Alert Service Bulletin No. AA-08055, Revision
B, dated August 12, 2009 (ASB).
    (ii) Determine and record on the component history card or
equivalent record the total number of landings for the crosstube. If
the landing information is unavailable, estimate the number by
multiplying the airframe hours TIS by 10. Continue to count and
record the number of landings for the crosstube. For the purposes of
this AD, a landing would be counted anytime the helicopter lifts off
into the air and then lands again with any further reduction of the
collective after the landing gear touches the ground.
    (2) Within 50 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD or
before reaching a total of 7,500 landings on any crosstube,
whichever occurs later:
    (i) Prepare the crosstube inspection areas as described in the
Accomplishment Instructions, Part B, paragraphs 1. through 5. and
Figure 1, of the ASB.
    (ii) Using a 10X or higher power magnifying glass and a bright
light, visually inspect the prepared areas of the crosstube for a
crack. If there is a crack, before further flight, replace the
crosstube with an airworthy crosstube.
    (iii) If there is no crack, following the inspection, prime and
paint the inspection areas by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, Part B, paragraphs 7. and 8., of the ASB. If there is
any corrosion or other damage, perform the replacement or repair
required in paragraph (d)(5)(iv) of this AD before priming and
painting the inspection areas.
    (3) Thereafter, at intervals not to exceed 200 landings, clean
the crosstube inspection areas by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, Part C, paragraph 1., of the ASB. Using a 10X or
higher power magnifying glass and a bright light, visually inspect
the clear-coated areas of the crosstube for a crack. If there is a
crack, before further flight, replace the crosstube with an
airworthy crosstube.
    (4) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD or before
reaching a total of 10,000 landings on any crosstube, whichever
occurs later, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 2,500
landings or 12 months, whichever occurs first, determine the
horizontal deflection of the crosstube from the centerline of the
helicopter (BL 0.0) to the outside of the skid tubes by following
the Accomplishment Instructions, Part D, paragraphs 1. and 2., of
the ASB. If the crosstube measures outside any of the limits
depicted in Figure 2 of the ASB, before further flight, replace the
crosstube with an airworthy crosstube.
    (5) Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD or
before reaching a total of 12,500 landings on any crosstube,
whichever occurs later, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed
5,000 landings:
    (i) Remove and disassemble the landing gear assembly and
crosstube to prepare for a fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI) by
following the Accomplishment Instructions, Part E.1, paragraphs 1.
through 6., of the ASB.
    (ii) Clean and prepare the crosstube by removing the sealant and
paint as described in the Accomplishment Instructions, Part E.2,
paragraphs 1. through 3. and Figure 3, of the ASB.
    (iii) Perform an FPI of the crosstube in the areas depicted in
Figure 3 of the ASB for a crack, any corrosion, a nick, scratch,
dent, or any other damage by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, Part E.3, paragraph 1., of the ASB. If there is a
crack, before further flight, replace the crosstube with an
airworthy crosstube.
    (iv) If there is any corrosion or a nick, scratch, dent, or any
other damage, before further flight, repair the crosstube to an
airworthy configuration if the damage is within the maximum repair
damage limits or replace the crosstube with an airworthy crosstube.
Chapter 3.5 Repair, Table 1. and Figure 3 of the AAI Instructions
for

Continued Airworthiness for Crosstubes, Report No. AA-01136,
Revision K, dated February 15, 2012, contains the maximum repair
damage limits and repair procedures.

(e) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOC)

    (1) The Manager, Rotorcraft Certification Office, FAA, may
approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to: Michael Kohner,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft Certification Office,
Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX
76137; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For operations conducted under a Part 119 operating
certificate or under Part 91, Subpart K, we suggest that you notify
your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the
manager of the local flight standards district office or certificate
holding district office before operating any aircraft complying with
this AD through an AMOC.

(f) Additional Information

    For service information identified in this AD, contact
Aeronautical Accessories, Inc., P.O. Box 3689, Bristol, TN 37625-
3689, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax (423) 538-
8469, or at http://www.aero-access.com. You may review a copy of
this information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas
76137.

(g) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 3213: Main Landing
Gear Strut/Axle/Truck.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 2, 2012.
Carlton N. Cochran,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-11472 Filed 5-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: May 21, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 97)]
[Notices]
[Page 23931]
[DOCID:fr21my09-148]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[AC 187-1C]

Schedule of Charges Outside the United States

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is announcing the
availability of Advisory Circular (AC) 187-1C which transmits an
updated schedule of charges for services of FAA Flight Standards
Aviation Safety Inspectors outside the United States. The advisory
circular has been updated in accordance with the procedures listed in
14 CFR Part 187, Appendix A.

DATES: This AC is effective on June 1, 2009.

ADDRESSES: How to obtain copies: A copy of this publication may be
downloaded from: http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/
rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/b38e4a75d8e55cae862575b6004e937a/$FILE/
AC%20187-1C.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Geoff McIntyre, Flight Standards
Service, AFS-51, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 14, 2009.
John W. McGraw,
Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. E9-11926 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: March 24, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 57)]
[Notices]
[Page 15556]
[DOCID:fr24mr08-102]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

In the Matter of Certain Companies Quoted on the Pink Sheets:
NeoTactix Corporation Graystone Park Enterprises, Inc. Younger America,
Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

March 20, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
the issuers listed below. As set forth below for each issuer, questions
have arisen regarding the adequacy and accuracy of publicly
disseminated information concerning, among other things: (1) The
companies' current financial condition, (2) the companies' management,
(3) the companies' business operations, and/or (4) stock promoting
activity.
    1. NeoTactix Corporation is a Nevada company with offices in
Irvine, California. Questions have arisen regarding the adequacy and
accuracy of statements in the company's press releases and promotional
videos concerning the company's management, operations, current
financial condition, transactions involving the issuance of the
company's shares, and concerning stock promoting activity.
    2. Graystone Park Enterprises, Inc. is a Colorado company with
offices in Orlando, Florida. Questions have arisen regarding the
adequacy and accuracy of press releases, promotional videos, and
statements on the company's Web site concerning the company's current
financial condition, operations, management, and concerning stock
promoting activity.
    3. Younger America, Inc. is a Nevada company with offices in Ft.
Lauderdale, Florida. Questions have arisen regarding the adequacy and
accuracy of press releases and promotional videos concerning the
company's current financial condition, operations, management,
transactions involving the issuance of the company's shares, and
concerning stock promoting activity.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the companies listed above.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the
companies listed above is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT
on March 20, 2008, through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on April 3, 2008.

    By the Commission.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 08-1070 Filed 3-21-08; 11:46 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P