[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 20, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58094-58098]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22032]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-1163; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-233-AD;
Amendment 39-16795; AD 2011-18-13]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; 328 Support Services GmbH (Type
Certificate Previously Held by AvCraft Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild
Dornier GmbH; Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH) Model 328-100 and -300 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to the products listed above. This AD results from
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an
aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    During a routine inspection, cracks have been found on an
aeroplane at the lower wing panel rear trailing edge inboard of flap
lever arm 1 (rib 5). A subsequent inspection of the other aeroplanes
in that operator's fleet revealed several more aeroplanes with
cracks at the same location. This condition, if not corrected, could
lead to structural failure of the affected wing panel, possibly
resulting in the wing separating from the airplane with consequent
loss of control.
* * * * *

    We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective October 25, 2011.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of October 25,
2011.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on December 2, 2010 (75
FR 75159), and proposed to supersede AD 2008-10-51, Amendment 39-15535
(73 FR 30752, May 29, 2008). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    During a routine inspection, cracks have been found on an
aeroplane at the lower wing panel rear trailing edge inboard of flap
lever arm 1 (rib 5). A subsequent inspection of the other aeroplanes
in that operator's fleet revealed several more aeroplanes with
cracks at the same location. This condition, if not corrected, could
lead to structural failure of the affected wing panel, possibly
resulting in the wing separating from the airplane with consequent
loss of control.
    To correct this unsafe condition, EASA [European Aviation Safety
Agency] issued Emergency AD 2008-0087-E [dated May 8, 2008] to
require detailed visual inspections (DVI) of both the left (LH) and
right (RH) wing panel rear trailing edge around rib 3 and rib 5 and
a subsequent Eddy Current inspection (NDI) [non-destructive
inspection] of the same area to detect cracks, follow-up repair
actions when cracks are found, and the reporting of all findings.
The TC [type certificate] holder has now developed a modification,
consisting of the cold expansion of the former lower wing panel
CAMLOC holes together with the installation of new attachment
material that will prevent the onset of cracks in the affected wing
panel.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
inspection and repair requirements of AD 2008-0087-E, which is
superseded, adds repetitive inspections and a requirement to modify
both the LH and RH wing panel rear trailing edges from rib 3 to rib
9. Modification does not constitute terminating action for the new
repetitive inspection requirements of this AD.

    The new inspections are eddy current inspections. The modification
includes cold expansion of the former lower wing panel CAMLOC holes and
installation of new attachment material. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.

MCAI Reference Updates

    EASA issued AD 2009-0194R1 on March 10, 2011, which was corrected
on March 22, 2011. References have been updated in Note 1 and paragraph
(p) of this AD to include this revision.

Request to Remove Repetitive Inspection Interval From Paragraph (h) of
This AD

    Garner CAD Technic Design Organization (GCT DO) Airworthiness
Office requested that the 400-flight-cycle repetitive inspection
interval be removed from paragraph (h) of the NPRM (75 FR 75159,
December 2, 2010). GCT DO Airworthiness Office stated that, based on
fatigue data, this repetitive inspection is not required, and is not
specified in revised EASA AD 2009-0194R1, dated March 10, 2011, and
corrected on March 22, 2011.
    We agree. Based on fatigue data, we have determined that the 400-
flight-cycle repetitive inspection interval should be removed from
paragraph (h) of this AD. The repetitive inspection was removed from
revised EASA AD 2009-0194R1, dated March 10, 2011, and corrected on
March 22, 2011. Paragraph (h) of this AD has been changed accordingly.
References to the 400-flight-cycle repetitive inspections also were
removed from paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD.
    To ensure that operators get credit for the most recent inspection
done in accordance with Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015
or ASB-328-57-037, both Revision 1, both dated May 8, 2008; or 328
Support Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or ASB-328-57-
037, both Revision 2, both dated May 20, 2008; we have clarified
paragraph (g) of this AD. We have replaced the phrase, ``in accordance
with the requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD,'' with the phrase,
``in accordance with Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or
ASB-328-57-037, both Revision 1, both dated May 8, 2008; or 328 Support
Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or ASB-328-57-037, both
Revision 2, both dated May 20, 2008.''

Request for Extended Inspection Interval in Paragraph (i) of This AD

    GCT DO Airworthiness Office requested that the initial compliance
time and repetitive inspection interval defined in paragraph (i) of the
NPRM (75 FR 75159, December 2, 2010) be extended from 800 flight cycles
to 1,500 flight cycles. GCT DO Airworthiness Office stated that this
extension has been allowed based on fatigue data, and was specified in
revised EASA AD 2009-0194R1, dated March 10, 2011, and corrected on
March 22, 2011.
    We agree to extend the initial compliance time and repetitive
inspection intervals for the reasons given by the commenter. Paragraph
(i) of this AD has been changed accordingly.

Request To Extend Threshold for Post-Modification Inspections

    GCT DO Airworthiness Office requested that based on fatigue data,
the threshold for the post-modification initial inspection be extended
from 800 flight cycles to 25,000 flight cycles for the Model 328-100
airplane, and from 800 flight cycles to 20,000 flight cycles for Model
328-300 airplanes, and that the repetitive inspections be extended from
800 flight cycles to 1,500 flight cycles.
    We agree to extend the threshold for post-modification initial
inspections as requested. Based on fatigue data, the referenced EASA AD
has included these extensions; therefore, we have added paragraph (k)
to the AD to include the new compliance times.

Additional Change to NPRM

    The NPRM (75 FR 75159, December 2, 2010) would have allowed
issuance of a special flight permit if a crack was found that
``exceeds'' 12.5 mm (0.49 inch). We have changed paragraph (o)(4)(ii)
of this AD to change the wording from ``exceeds'' to ``is less than or
equal to.''

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect about 49 products of U.S.
registry.
    The actions that are required by AD 2008-10-51 and retained in this
AD take about 2 work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of $85
per work-hour. Required parts cost about $0 per product. Based on these
figures, the estimated cost of the currently required actions is $170
per product.
    We estimate that it will take about 8 work-hours per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $11,600 per
product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that
are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the
U.S. operators to be $601,720, or $12,280 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15535 (73 FR
30752, May 29, 2008) and adding the following new AD:

    2011-18-13 328 Support Services GmbH (Type Certificate
Previously Held by AvCraft Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild Dornier GmbH;
Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH): Amendment 39-16795. Docket No. FAA-2010-
1163; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-233-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective October
25, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2008-10-51, Amendment 39-15535 (73 FR
30752, May 29, 2008).

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to 328 Support Services GmbH (Type
Certificate previously held by AvCraft Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild
Dornier GmbH; Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH) Model 328-100 and -300
airplanes; all serial numbers; certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    During a routine inspection, cracks have been found on an
aeroplane at the lower wing panel rear trailing edge inboard of flap
lever arm 1 (rib 5). A subsequent inspection of the other aeroplanes
in that operator's fleet revealed several more aeroplanes with
cracks at the same location. This condition, if not corrected, could
lead to structural failure of the affected wing panel, possibly
resulting in the wing separating from the airplane with consequent
loss of control.
* * * * *
    The new inspections are eddy current inspections. The
modification includes cold expansion of the former lower wing panel
CAMLOC holes and installation of new attachment material.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Restatement of Requirements of AD 2008-10-51 (73 FR 30752, May 29,
2008), With Updated Service Information and Removal of Certain
Repetitive Inspections

Repetitive Detailed Visual Inspections for Cracks

    (g) Within 10 flight cycles, or 10 flight hours, or 7 days,
whichever occurs first after June 3, 2008 (the effective date of AD
2008-10-51 (73 FR 30752, May 29, 2008)): Accomplish a detailed
visual inspection of both the left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH)
lower wing panel inboard and outboard of flap lever arm 1 (rib 5)
for cracks, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or ASB-328-57-037,
both Revision 1, both dated May 8, 2008, as applicable; or 328
Support Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or ASB-328-
57-037, both Revision 2, both dated May 20, 2008, as applicable.
After the effective date of this AD, use only 328 Support Services
Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or ASB-328-57-037, both
Revision 2, both dated May 20, 2008, as applicable. If no crack is
detected, repeat the detailed visual inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 50 flight hours. If any crack is detected,
before further flight, do an eddy current inspection, in accordance
with Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or ASB-328-57-
037, both Revision 1, both dated May 8, 2008, as applicable; or 328
Support Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or ASB-328-
57-037, both Revision 2, both dated May 20, 2008, as applicable.

Eddy Current Inspections for Cracks

    (h) Except as required by paragraph (g) of this AD, within 400
flight hours or 3 months after June 3, 2008, whichever occurs first:
Accomplish an eddy current inspection for cracking of both the LH
and RH lower wing panel in the vicinity of rib 3 and inboard and
outboard of flap lever arm 1 (rib 5), in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB-
328J-57-015 or ASB-328-57-037, both Revision 1, both dated May 8,
2008, as applicable; or 328 Support Services Alert Service Bulletin
ASB-328J-57-015 or ASB-328-57-037, both Revision 2, both dated May
20, 2008, as applicable. After the effective date of this AD, use
only 328 Support Services Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015 or
ASB-328-57-037, both Revision 2, both dated May 20, 2008, as
applicable. Accomplishment of the eddy current inspection terminates
the detailed visual inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD.

New Requirements of This AD

New Repetitive Intervals for Eddy Current Inspections

    (i) Within 1,500 flight cycles after the most recent eddy
current inspection done in accordance with the applicable service
bulletin listed in table 1 of this AD, or within 60 days after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do an eddy
current inspection for cracking of the lower wing panel (outside)
around the flap lever arm 1 (rib 5), in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of 328 Support Services Alert Service
Bulletin ASB-328-57-037 (for Model 328-100 airplanes) or ASB-328J-
57-015 (for Model 328-300 airplanes), both Revision 2, both dated
May 20, 2008. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 1,500 flight cycles, except as provided by paragraph (k) of
this AD.

                       Table 1--Service Bulletins
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Service Bulletin           Revision                Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dornier Alert Service                       1  May 8, 2008.
 Bulletin ASB-328-57-037.
Dornier Alert Service                       1  May 8, 2008.
 Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015.
328 Support Services Alert                  2  May 20, 2008.
 Service Bulletin ASB-328-57-
 037.
328 Support Services Alert                  2  May 20, 2008.
 Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-
 015.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Inspection and Modification of Lower Wing Panel

    (j) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, do an
eddy current inspection for cracking of the lower wing panel
(outside) around the flap lever arm 1 (rib 5). If no cracking is
found, within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, modify
the lower wing panel by doing a cold expansion of the CAMLOC holes
and installing new attachment material from rib 9 LH to rib 9 RH. Do
all actions required by this paragraph in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of 328 Support Services Service Bulletin
SB-328-57-481 (for Model 328-100 airplanes) or SB-328J-57-230 (for
Model 328-300 airplanes), both Revision 1, both dated October 15,
2009.
    (k) After the modification required by paragraph (j) is done, do
the eddy current inspection required by paragraph (i) of this AD at
the applicable time specified in paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this
AD. Repeat the inspections thereafter at the intervals specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD.
    (1) For Model 328-100 airplanes: Within 25,000 flight cycles
after accomplishing the modification specified in paragraph (j) of
this AD.
    (2) For Model 328-300 airplanes: Within 20,000 flight cycles
after accomplishing the modification specified in paragraph (j) of
this AD.

Repair

    (l) If any cracking is found during any inspection required by
this AD, before further flight contact 328 Support Services GmbH for
repair instructions and do the repair using a method approved by
either the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
(or its delegated agent).

Inspections Accomplished According to Previous Issues of Service
Bulletins

    (m) Inspections accomplished before the effective date of this
AD according to Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328-57-037 or
Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-015, both Revision 1,
both dated May 8, 2008, as applicable, are considered acceptable for
compliance with the inspection requirements of paragraphs (i) and
(j) of this AD.

Report

    (n) At the applicable times specified in paragraphs (n)(1) and
(n)(2) of this AD: Send 328 Support Services GmbH a report of
findings (both positive and negative) found during each inspection
required by paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (j) of this AD. The report
must include the inspection results, a description of any cracks
found, the airplane serial number, and the number of landings and
flight hours on the airplane. Send the report to 328 Support
Services GmbH, Global Support Center, P.O. Box 1252, D-82231
Wessling, Federal Republic of Germany; Telephone +49 8153 88111
6666; fax +49 8153 88111 6565; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (1) For any inspection done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Within 30 days after the inspection.
    (2) For any inspection done before the effective date of this
AD: Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1:  This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows:
    EASA Airworthiness Directive 2009-0194R1, dated March 10, 2011,
corrected March 22, 2011, gives credit for eddy current inspections
conducted in accordance with the maintenance review board tasks. We
are not giving credit for those inspections.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (o) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Branch, send it to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-1137; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information may be e-mailed to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district
office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: A Federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a
person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5
minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of information. All
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing
the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave.,
SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance
Officer, AES-200.
    (4) Special Flight Permits: Special flight permits may be issued
in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the
airplane to a location where the requirements of paragraphs (g),
(h), (i), (j), (k), and (l) of this AD can be done if the following
conditions are met:
    (i) The initial inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD
must be accomplished.
    (ii) If a crack indication is less than or equal to 12.5 mm
(0.49 inch), the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, concurs
with issuance of the special flight permits.

Related Information

    (p) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2009-0194R1,
dated March 10, 2011, corrected March 22, 2011, and the service
bulletins listed in table 2 of this AD, for related information.

                   Table 2--Related Service Bulletins
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Service Bulletin           Revision                Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
328 Support Services Alert                  2  May 20, 2008.
 Service Bulletin ASB-328-57-
 037.
328 Support Services Alert                  2  May 20, 2008.
 Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-
 015.
328 Support Services Service                1  October 15, 2009.
 Bulletin SB-328-57-481.
328 Support Services GmbH                   1  October 15, 2009.
 Service Bulletin SB-328J-57-
 230.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (q) You must use the service information contained in table 3 of
this AD to do the actions required by this AD, as applicable, unless
the AD specifies otherwise.

             Table 3--All Material Incorporated by Reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Service Bulletin           Revision                Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
328 Support Services Alert                  2  May 20, 2008.
 Service Bulletin ASB-328-57-
 037.
328 Support Services Alert                  2  May 20, 2008.
 Service Bulletin ASB-328J-57-
 015.
328 Support Services Service                1  October 15, 2009.
 Bulletin SB-328-57-481.
328 Support Services GmbH                   1  October 15, 2009.
 Service Bulletin SB-328J-57-
 230.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact 328
Support Services GmbH, Global Support Center, P.O. Box 1252, D-82231
Wessling, Federal Republic of Germany; telephone +49 8153 88111
6666; fax +49 8153 88111 6565; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet
http://www.328support.de.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 19, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-22032 Filed 9-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


E Mail From: Keith_ B._ Belton@ omb. eop. gov 06/ 25/ 2004 10: 25 AM To: Bill Harnett/ RTP/ USEPA/ US@ EPA cc:

Subject: ERP stay one more change FYI  Forwarded by Keith B. Belton/ OMB/ EOP on 06/ 25/ 2004 10: 15AM

From: Keith B. Belton 06/ 25/ 2004 10: 19: 48 AM Record Type: Record To: Wehrum. Bill@ epamail. epa. gov@ SMTP@ Exchange cc:

Subject: ERP stay one more change We have one more change to the ERP stay. In the redline document, page 6, first full paragraph, second sentence: change " RMRR exclusion" to " text". The sentence should now read: " In the absence of the ERP, the prior regulatory text remains in effect."

Please make this change in the version that comes to us for final clearance.

Call me at 395 4815 if you have any questions.


Products Excluded from Aug. 31, 2011 Cancellation Order

Certain requests to voluntarily cancel pesticide products announced in the January 19, 2011 6(f) Notice, (FRL-8857-1) were omitted from the cancellation order published August 31, 2011 (FRL-8885-6) because those products were cancelled in a previously published document. These products are listed in the table below. The effective date of cancellation of these products was July 15, 2011 as stated in the cancellation order titled: ``Cancellation of Pesticides for Non-Payment of Year 2011 Registration Maintenance Fees.'' The cancellation order was published July 27, 2011 (76 FR 44907) (FRL-8879-8) and can be found in docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0558.

Registration No.
Product Name
Active Ingredients
000004-00059
Bonide Rose and Flower Dust
Malathion
Carbaryl
Captan
001719-00044
Zin-Tox Wood Preservative
Zinc naphthenate
002517-00066
Sergeant's Skip Flea & Tick Spray Shampoo Plus Conditioner for Dogs
Piperonyl butoxide
Permethrin
002829-00082
Vinyzene BP-5
10,10'-Oxybisphenoxarsine
061282-00007
Ramik Meal Rodenticide for Control of Commensal Rats and Mice
Diphacinone
WA-000031
Pear Wrap III
Copper carbonate, basic
Ethoxyquin
WA-050007
Sencor DF 75% Dry Flowable Herbicide
Metribuzin


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2204-2205]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00340]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1640; Airspace Docket No. 22-AWA-9]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of Class C Airspace; Buffalo, NY

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends the Greater Buffalo International Airport,
NY, Class C airspace description to update the Greater Buffalo
International Airport and Lancaster Airport names and the associated
airport reference point (ARP) geographic coordinates for each airport
to match the FAA's National Airspace System Resource (NASR) database
information. Additionally, this action makes a technical amendment to
the airspace description header information by changing the title of
the airspace area. This action does not change the boundaries,
altitudes, or operating requirements of the Class C airspace area.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, April 20, 2023. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11
and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Rules and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it updates listed airport names and the associated ARP
geographic coordinates for those airports and amends the airspace
description header information by changing the airspace title.

History

    Class C airspace areas are designed to improve air safety by
reducing the risk of midair collisions in high volume airport terminal
areas and to enhance the management of air traffic operations in that
area. While amending Class D and Class E airspace areas in the vicinity
of Niagara Falls and Buffalo, NY, the FAA identified that the Greater
Buffalo International Airport and Lancaster Airport names and
associated ARP geographic coordinates required updating in the Greater
Buffalo International Airport Class C airspace description.
Additionally, the FAA identified a technical amendment to the Greater
Buffalo International Airport airspace description header information
necessary to change the title of the Class C airspace area to reflect
city and state instead of the airport name the airspace is designated
around.
    This action updates the airport names and ARP geographic
coordinates for both airports to match the FAA's NASR database
information and changes the title of the Class C airspace area to
comply with FAA Order JO 7400.2 airspace legal description guidance.
    Class C airspace areas are published in paragraph 4000 of FAA Order
JO 7400.11G, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15, 2022,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class C airspace
listed in this document will be published subsequently in FAA Order JO
7400.11.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September
15, 2022. FAA Order JO 7400.11G is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11G lists Class
A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This action amends 14 CFR part 71 by amending the Greater Buffalo
International Airport, NY, Class C airspace description to update the
Greater Buffalo International Airport and Lancaster Airport names and
associated ARP geographic coordinates. This action also makes a
technical amendment to the airspace description header by changing the
airspace title.
    The ``Greater Buffalo International Airport'' name is changed to
``Buffalo Niagara International Airport'' and the ``Lancaster Airport''
name is changed to ``Buffalo-Lancaster Regional Airport''.
Additionally, the ARP geographic coordinates for the Buffalo Niagara
International Airport are changed from ``lat. 42[deg]56'26'' N, long.
78[deg]43'56'' W'' to

``lat. 42[deg]56'26'' N, long. 78[deg]43'50'' W'' and the ARP
geographic coordinates for the Buffalo-Lancaster Regional Airport are
changed from ``lat. 42[deg]55'20'' N, long. 78[deg]36'44'' W'' to
``lat. 42[deg]55'19'' N, long. 78[deg]36'43'' W''. Lastly, the airspace
title in the airspace description header is changed from ``Greater
Buffalo International Airport, NY'' to ``Buffalo, NY''. The airport
name and ARP geographic coordinates updates are made to coincide with
the FAA's NASR database information. The airspace title technical
amendment is made to comply with airspace legal description guidance
contained in FAA Order JO 7400.2.
    This action does not affect the boundaries, altitudes, or operating
requirements of the airspace. Therefore, notice and public procedure
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) is unnecessary.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated,
does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action making technical amendments
to the Buffalo, NY, Class C airspace description qualifies for
categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and its implementing regulations at 40 CFR part
1500, and in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts:
Policies and Procedures, paragraph 5-6.5a, which categorically excludes
from full environmental impact review rulemaking actions that designate
or modify classes of airspace areas, airways, routes, and reporting
points (see 14 CFR part 71, Designation of Class A, B, C, D, and E
Airspace Areas; Air Traffic Service Routes; and Reporting Points). As
such, this airspace action is not expected to result in any potentially
significant environmental impacts. In accordance with FAA Order
1050.1F, paragraph 5-2 regarding Extraordinary Circumstances, the FAA
has reviewed this action for factors and circumstances in which a
normally categorically excluded action may have a significant
environmental impact requiring further analysis. Accordingly, the FAA
has determined that no extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant
preparation of an environmental assessment or environmental impact
study.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19,
2022, effective September 15, 2022, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 4000 Class C Airspace.

* * * * *

AEA NY C Buffalo, NY

Buffalo Niagara International Airport, NY
    (Lat. 42[deg]56'26'' N, long. 78[deg]43'50'' W)
Buffalo Airfield, NY
(Lat. 42[deg]51'43'' N, long. 78[deg]43'00'' W)
    Buffalo-Lancaster Regional Airport, NY
(Lat. 42[deg]55'19'' N, long. 78[deg]36'43'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
4,700 feet MSL within a 5-mile radius of the Buffalo Niagara
International Airport, excluding that airspace within a 1-mile
radius of the Buffalo Airfield and within a 1-mile radius of the
Buffalo-Lancaster Regional Airport; and that airspace extending
upward from 2,200 feet MSL to and including 4,700 feet MSL within a
10-mile radius of the Buffalo Niagara International Airport,
excluding that airspace within Canada.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 5, 2023.
Scott M. Rosenbloom,
Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2023-00340 Filed 1-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 51 (Tuesday, March 17, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13761-13763]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05788]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2015-0536; Directorate Identifier 2015-CE-004-AD;
Amendment 39-18116; AD 2015-05-06]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Flugzeugwerke Altenrheim AG (FFA)
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Flugzeugwerke Altenrheim AG (FFA) Models AS 202/15 ``BRAVO'', AS 202/
18A ``BRAVO'', and AS 202/18A4 ``BRAVO'' airplanes. This AD results
from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by
the aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an
unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as corrosion on the upper forward fuselage stringers. We are
issuing this AD to require actions to address the unsafe condition on
these products.

DATES: This AD is effective March 17, 2015.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of March 17,
2015.
    We must receive comments on this AD by May 1, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Gomolzig
Flugzeug- und Maschinenbau GmbH, Eisenwerkstra[szlig]e 9, 58332
Schwelm, telephone: +49 (0) 2336 490 330; fax; +49 (0) 2336 490 339;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet: http://www.gomolzig.de/. You may
view this referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-0536.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
0536; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone
(800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available
in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued AD
No. 2015-0023-E, dated February 18, 2015, (referred to after this as
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for Flugzeugwerke
Altenrheim AG (FFA) Models AS 202/15 ``BRAVO'', AS 202/18A ``BRAVO'',
and AS 202/18A4 ``BRAVO'' airplanes. The MCAI states:

    Heavy corrosion was reportedly discovered on an AS 202
aeroplane, between the forward (FWD) windshield frame angle and the
upper FWD stringer, left hand (LH) and right hand (RH). The
corrosion was found underneath the removed windshield frame.
Corrosion was not detected during a general visual inspection from
below.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to
failure of the FWD upper stringer, which reduces the structural
integrity of the affected area.
    To address this potential unsafe condition, Gomolzig Flugzeug-
und Maschinenbau GmbH (GFM), acting on behalf of the TC holder, have
issued Service Bulletin (SB) No. 2015-1 to provide inspection
instructions.
    For the reasons described above, this AD requires repetitive
inspections of the upper FWD stringer (LH and RH) structure for
signs of corrosion and, depending on the findings, the
accomplishment of applicable corrective action(s).
    This AD is considered to be an interim action and further AD
action may follow.

You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-0536.

Relevant Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Gomolzig Flugzeug- und Maschinenbau GmbH has issued Service
Bulletin GFM SB 2015-1, dated February 5, 2015. The actions described
in this service information are intended to correct the unsafe
condition identified in the MCAI. The Gomolzig Flugzeug- und
Maschinenbau GmbH service bulletin describes procedures for inspecting
the upper forward stringer (LH and RH) structure for signs of corrosion
and making all necessary repairs. This service information is
reasonably available; see ADDRESSES for ways to access this service
information.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all information provided by the State of Design Authority and
determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same type design.
    This AD is considered an interim action. After issuing this AD, we
may initiate further AD action to require a possible terminating action
for the 12-month repetitive inspections.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because
corrosion on the upper forward fuselage stringers could cause them to
fail, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the
windshield frame. Therefore, we determined that notice and opportunity
for public comment before issuing this AD are impracticable and that
good cause exists for making this amendment effective in fewer than 30
days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-0536; Directorate
Identifier 2015-CE-004-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 1 product of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that it will take about 6 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the AD on U.S.
operators to be $510.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions will
take about 20 work-hours and require parts costing $1,000, for a cost
of $2,700 per product. We have no way of determining at this time if
the affected airplane may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2015-05-06 Flugzeugwerke Altenrheim AG (FFA): Amendment 39-18116;
Docket No. FAA-2015-0536; Directorate Identifier 2015-CE-004-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective March 17,
2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Flugzeugwerke Altenrheim AG (FFA) Models AS
202/15 ``BRAVO'', AS 202/18A ``BRAVO'', and AS 202/18A4 ``BRAVO''
airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 53: Fuselage.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report of corrosion found on the upper
forward windshield frame angle and the upper forward stringer. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct corrosion on the left-hand
(LH) and the right-hand (RH) upper forward fuselage stringers. If
not detected and corrected, this condition could lead to failure of
the LH and/or the RH upper forward fuselage stringers, which could
result in reduced structural integrity of the windshield frame.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Before further flight after March 17, 2015 (the effective
date of this AD) and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 12
months, do a detailed visual inspection of the LH and RH forward
(FWD) upper stringer top side structure for corrosion and any signs
of damage to the corrosion protection. Do the inspection following
the Instructions section in Gomolzig Flugzeug- und Maschinenbau GmbH
Service Bulletin GFM SB 2015-1, dated February 5, 2015.
    (2) If corrosion or any signs of damage to the corrosion
protection is found during any inspection required in paragraph
(f)(1) of this AD, before further flight after the inspection where
corrosion or signs of damage to the corrosion protection is found,
remove the corrosion at the affected area following the Instructions
section in Gomolzig Flugzeug- und Maschinenbau GmbH Service Bulletin
GFM SB 2015-1, dated February 5, 2015.
    (3) If corrosion is found during any inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD that exceeds the allowable limits
specified in paragraph 1.f of the Instructions section in Gomolzig
Flugzeug- und Maschinenbau GmbH Service Bulletin GFM SB 2015-1,
dated February 5, 2015, before further flight after the inspection
where corrosion is found that exceeds the allowable limits, contact
Gomolzig Flugzeug- und Maschinenbau GmbH at the address specified in
paragraph (i)(3) of this AD for an FAA-approved repair scheme and
incorporate the repair.
    (4) Within 30 days after doing the initial inspection required
in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, report the results, including
findings of no corrosion, to Gomolzig Flugzeug- und Maschinenbau
GmbH at the address specified in paragraph (i)(3) of this AD using
page 5 of Gomolzig Flugzeug- und Maschinenbau GmbH Service Bulletin
GFM SB 2015-1, dated February 5, 2015.

(g) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane

to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal
inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

(g) Special Flight Permit

    In accordance with 14 CFR 39.23, a single flight is allowed to a
location where the initial inspection required in paragraph (f)(1)
of this AD can be done provided the following limitations are
adhered to:
    (1) No aerobatic maneuvers.
    (2) Normal category maneuvering load factors must not exceed
+3.8g/-1.9g.

(h) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.
2015-0023-E, dated February 18, 2015, for related information. You
may examine the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-0536.

(i) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Gomolzig Flugzeug- und Maschinenbau GmbH Service Bulletin
GFM SB 2015-1, dated February 5, 2015.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For Gomolzig Flugzeug- und Maschinenbau GmbH service
information identified in this AD, contact Gomolzig Flugzeug- und
Maschinenbau GmbH, Eisenwerkstra[szlig]e 9, 58332 Schwelm,
telephone: +49 (0) 2336 490 330; fax; +49 (0) 2336 490 339; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet: http://www.gomolzig.de/.
    (4) You may view this referenced service information at the FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2015-0536.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on March 4, 2015.
Pat Mullen,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-05788 Filed 3-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 148 (Thursday, August 5, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 42826]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16716]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER21-2555-000]

Martinsville OnSite Generation, LLC; Supplemental Notice That
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section
204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Martinsville OnSite Generation, LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is August 19, 2021.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 30, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-16716 Filed 8-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 45 (Thursday, March 7, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14642-14644]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04629]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-1157; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-061-AD;
Amendment 39-17371; AD 2013-04-13]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all BAE
SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Model BAe 146 and Avro 146-RJ series
airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report that certain ceramic
terminal blocks, through which the wiring for the engine fire
extinguishers, fire detection circuits, and engine and intake anti-ice
system are routed, have been found to have moisture ingress, which can
degrade the insulation resistance of the ceramic terminal blocks. This
AD requires a one-time insulation resistance test of ceramic terminal
blocks, and if necessary, replacement of the blocks. We are issuing
this AD to prevent latent failure of the number 2 fire bottle, which,
in the event of an engine fire, could result in failure of the fire
bottle to discharge when activated and possibly preventing the
flightcrew from extinguishing an engine fire.

DATES: This AD becomes effective April 11, 2013.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 11,
2013.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,

International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on November 5, 2012 (77
FR 66415). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) states:

    Moisture ingress has been discovered on certain ceramic terminal
blocks, mounted on the engine cowlings, through which the wiring for
the engine fire extinguishers, fire detection circuits and engine
and intake anti ice system are routed. The affected terminal blocks
were introduced through BAE Systems SB 71-077-01693A (modification
HCM01693A) during the period 2002-2004, as this modification was
mandated by CAA UK AD 005-10-2001 [which corresponds with FAA AD
2003-03-10, Amendment 39-13034 (68 FR 4902, January 31, 2003)].
Moisture ingress has a detrimental effect on the insulation
resistance of the ceramic terminal block with the resultant
possibility of interconnections between all terminals. Most of the
possible failure conditions in the terminal block should result in
an evident warning or other indication. However, the functional loss
of the number 2 fire bottle would be a dormant failure.
    This condition, if not corrected, could result in the failure of
a fire bottle to discharge when activated, possibly preventing the
flight crew in extinguishing an engine fire.
    For the reasons described above, this [European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA)] AD requires a one-time inspection of the ceramic
terminal blocks to determine the insulation resistance and,
depending on findings, replacement of terminal blocks, and the
reporting of the results to the BAE Systems. These will be used to
establish a suitable repetitive inspection interval, which is
expected to be introduced through the Maintenance Review Board (MRB)
process.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (77 FR 66415, November 5,
2012) or on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (77 FR 66415, November 5, 2012) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 66415, November 5, 2012).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 2 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 10 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $1,700, or $850 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 1 work-hour and require parts costing $949, for a cost of
$1,034 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (77 FR 66415, November 5,
2012), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2013-04-13 BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED: Amendment 39-17371.
Docket No. FAA-2012-1157; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-061-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective April 11,
2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Model
BAe 146-100A, -200A, and -300A airplanes; and Model Avro 146-RJ70A,
146-RJ85A, and 146-RJ100A airplanes; certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24: Electrical
Power.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report that certain ceramic terminal
blocks, through which the wiring for the engine fire extinguishers,
fire detection circuits, and engine and intake anti-ice system are
routed, have been found to have moisture ingress, which can degrade
the insulation resistance of the ceramic terminal blocks. We are
issuing this AD to prevent latent failure of the number 2 fire
bottle, which, in the event of an engine fire, could result in
failure of the fire bottle to discharge when activated and possibly
preventing the flightcrew from extinguishing an engine fire.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Inspection

    Within 4,000 flight cycles or 18 months, whichever occurs first
after the effective date of this AD, do an insulation resistance
test on each terminal block, in accordance with paragraphs 2.C.,
2.D., 2.E., and 2.F. of the Accomplishment Instructions of BAE
SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Inspection Service Bulletin 24-143,
Revision 1, dated October 2, 2012.

(h) Replacement

    If, during the test required by paragraph (g) of this AD, any
terminal block is found to have a value of less than 50 megohms,
before next flight, replace it with a new or serviceable terminal
block, in accordance with paragraph 2.G. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Inspection Service
Bulletin 24-143, Revision 1, dated October 2, 2012.

(i) Inspection Report Difference

    Where BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Inspection Service
Bulletin 24-143, Revision 1, dated October 2, 2012, specifies to
complete the test result sheets in Appendices 1, 2, 3, and 4 and the
inspection report in Appendix 6, and send the information to BAE
SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED, this AD does not require that action.

(j) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS)
LIMITED Inspection Service Bulletin 24-143, dated September 26,
2011, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.

(k) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Todd
Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(l) Related Information

    (1) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2012-0040, dated March 13, 2012; and BAE SYSTEMS
(OPERATIONS) LIMITED Inspection Service Bulletin 24-143, Revision 1,
dated October 2, 2012; for related information.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact BAE
SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED, Customer Information Department,
Prestwick International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United
Kingdom; telephone +44 1292 675207; fax +44 1292 675704; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/RegionalAircraft/index.htm. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

(m) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Inspection Service Bulletin
24-143, Revision 1, dated October 2, 2012.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact BAE
SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED, Customer Information Department,
Prestwick International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United
Kingdom; telephone +44 1292 675207; fax +44 1292 675704; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/RegionalAircraft/index.htm.
    (4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 21, 2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-04629 Filed 3-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


TPC Table Abbreviation Codes Abbreviations: SIC, Standard Industrial Classification; P factor, Process pipe factor; Al, Aluminum; Sb, Antimony; CN, Cyanide; CACO3, Hardness; Mn, Manganese; Ni, Nickel; DO, Dissolved Oxygen; Se, Selenium; Ag, Silver; BOD, Biochemical Oxygen Demand; TSS, Total Suspended Solids; TN, Total Nitrogen; TKN, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen; TP, Total Phosphorous; FCB, Fecal Coliform Bacteria; As, Arsenic; Cd, Cadmium; Cr, Chromium; Cu, Copper; Fe, Iron; Pb, Lead; Hg, Mercury; Zn, Zinc; O& G, Oil and Grease; PCB, Polychlorinated Biphenyls; CHP, Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Pesticides.

Special Discharge Activity Codes ( SDAC): FP, highly seasonal operation; FQ, year round operation with some seasonal variation; FT, year round operation with some minor variation; CV, plants processing finfish and shellfish; CF, species processed unknown; CW, plants processing a diversity of shellfish; CY, plants processing a limited number of shellfish; CX, plants processing a diversity of finfish; CZ, plants processing a limited number of finfish. SE, base load plant; SP, peak load plant; WN, nuclear steam electric power plant; WR, residential code assigned based on SIC ( SIC = 6513 6515, 7011 7041, 8811); WA, indicates that alum coagulation is the main treatment process; WF, indicates that iron treatment is the major treatment process; TU, untreated wastewater; TP, primary wastewater treatment; TS, secondary wastewater treatment; TT, tertiary wastewater treatment.


[Federal Register: November 3, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 213)]
[Notices]
[Page 65305-65306]
[DOCID:fr03no08-39]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-109-000]

Scotia Capital Energy Inc.; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

October 27, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Scotia Capital Energy Inc.'s application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is November 26, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the

eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-26113 Filed 10-31-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P