[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 100 (Friday, May 22, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31124-31130]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11096]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 60

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0195; FRL-10009-20-OAR]
RIN 2060-AU87

Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters, New
Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
amend the Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters,
New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces. In response
to the situation created by the COVID-19 pandemic, this proposed action
restores the retail sales opportunities that were provided by the
original 5-year period for ``Step 1'' wood heaters, hydronic heaters,
and forced-air furnaces that were manufactured or imported before the
May 15, 2020, ``Step 2'' compliance date. Upon promulgation, retailers
may continue selling Step 1 heaters through November 30, 2020.

DATES: Comments. Comments must be received on or before July 6, 2020.
    Public hearing: If anyone contacts us requesting a public hearing
on or before May 27, 2020, the EPA will hold a virtual public hearing
on June 8, 2020. Please refer to the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for additional information on the public hearing.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2018-0195, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov/
(our preferred method). Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Include Docket ID No. EPA-
HQ-OAR-2018-0195 in the subject line of the message.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
number for this rulemaking. Comments received may be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information provided. For

detailed instructions on sending comments and additional information on
the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document. Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public
and our staff, the EPA Docket Center and Reading Room was closed to
public visitors on March 31, 2020, to reduce the risk of transmitting
COVID-19. Our Docket Center staff will continue to provide remote
customer service via email, phone, and webform. We encourage the public
to submit comments via https://www.regulations.gov/ or email, as there
is a temporary suspension of mail delivery to the EPA, and no hand
deliveries are currently accepted. For further information on EPA
Docket Center services and the current status, please visit us online
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    If requested, the virtual hearing will be held on June 8, 2020. The
hearing will convene at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) and will
conclude at 3:00 p.m. EST. The EPA will announce further details on the
virtual public hearing website at https://www.epa.gov/residential-wood-heaters. Refer to the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for
additional information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about this action,
contact Nathan Topham, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number:
(919) 541-0483 and email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Participation in virtual public hearing. Please note that the EPA
is deviating from its typical approach because the President has
declared a national emergency. Due to the current Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations, as well as state and
local orders for social distancing to limit the spread of COVID-19, the
EPA cannot hold in-person public meetings at this time.
    If a public hearing is requested, the EPA will begin pre-
registering speakers for the hearing upon publication of this document
in the Federal Register. To register to speak at the virtual hearing,
please use the online registration form available at https://www.epa.gov/residential-wood-heaters or contact Adrian Gates at (919)
541-4860 or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>to register to speak at
the virtual hearing. The last day to pre-register to speak at the
hearing will be June 4, 2020. On June 5, 2020, the EPA will post a
general agenda for the hearing that will list pre-registered speakers
in approximate order at: https://www.epa.gov/residential-wood-heaters.
    The EPA will make every effort to follow the schedule as closely as
possible on the day of the hearing; however, please plan for the
hearing to run either ahead of schedule or behind schedule.
    Each commenter will have 5 minutes to provide oral testimony. The
EPA encourages commenters to provide the EPA with a copy of their oral
testimony electronically (via email) by emailing it to Nathan Topham
and Adrian Gates. The EPA also recommends submitting the text of your
oral testimony as written comments to the rulemaking docket.
    The EPA may ask clarifying questions during the oral presentations
but will not respond to the presentations at that time. Written
statements and supporting information submitted during the comment
period will be considered with the same weight as oral testimony and
supporting information presented at the public hearing.
    Please note that any updates made to any aspect of the hearing will
be posted online at https://www.epa.gov/residential-wood-heaters. While
the EPA expects the hearing to go forward as set forth above, if
requested, please monitor our website or contact Adrian Gates at (919)
541-4860 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>to determine if there are any updates.
The EPA does not intend to publish a document in the Federal Register
announcing updates.
    If you require the services of a translator or a special
accommodation such as audio description, please pre-register for the
hearing with Adrian Gates and describe your needs by May 29, 2020. The
EPA may not be able to arrange accommodations without advance notice.
    Docket. The EPA has established a docket for this rulemaking under
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0195. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov/ website. Although listed,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket materials are available electronically
through https://www.regulations.gov/.
    Instructions. Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2018-0195. The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or
otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov/ or email. This
type of information should be submitted by mail as discussed below.
    The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
    The https://www.regulations.gov/ website allows you to submit your
comment anonymously, which means the EPA will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly to the EPA without going through
https://www.regulations.gov/, your email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the internet. If you submit an
electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include your name and
other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
digital storage media you submit. If the EPA cannot read your comment
due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification,
the EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files
should not include special characters or any form of encryption and be
free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about the
EPA's public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    The EPA is temporarily suspending its Docket Center and Reading
Room for public visitors to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID-19.
Written

comments submitted by mail are temporarily suspended and no hand
deliveries will be accepted. Notwithstanding the suspension of mail
submission of regular comments, comments containing CBI should be
submitted by mail.\1\ Our Docket Center staff will continue to provide
remote customer service via email, phone, and webform. We encourage the
public to submit comments via https://www.regulations.gov/. For further
information and updates on EPA Docket Center services, please visit us
online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ As discussed below, CBI should not be submitted
electronically through Regulations.gov or email. CBI should be
submitted following the procedures specified in the ``Submitting
CBI'' section below. We encourage commenters to submit redacted or
non-CBI versions of comments electronically and include a statement
in their electronic comments that they have separately submitted any
CBI following the instructions below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EPA continues to carefully and continuously monitor information
from the CDC, local area health departments, and our federal partners
so that we can respond rapidly as conditions change regarding COVID-19.
    Submitting CBI. Do not submit information containing CBI to the EPA
through https://www.regulations.gov/ or email. Clearly mark the part or
all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information on
any digital storage media that you mail to the EPA, mark the outside of
the digital storage media as CBI and then identify electronically
within the digital storage media the specific information that is
claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comments
that includes information claimed as CBI, you must submit a copy of the
comments that does not contain the information claimed as CBI directly
to the public docket through the procedures outlined above. If you
submit any digital storage media that does not contain CBI, mark the
outside of the digital storage media clearly that it does not contain
CBI. Information not marked as CBI will be included in the public
docket and the EPA's electronic public docket without prior notice.
Information marked as CBI will not be disclosed except in accordance
with procedures set forth in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
2. Send or deliver information identified as CBI only to the following
address: OAQPS Document Control Officer (C404-02), OAQPS, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0195. Note that written
comments containing CBI and submitted by mail may be delayed and no
hand deliveries will be accepted.
    Preamble acronyms and abbreviations. We use multiple acronyms and
terms in this preamble. While this list may not be exhaustive, to ease
the reading of this preamble and for reference purposes, the EPA
defines the following terms and acronyms here:

BSER best system of emission reduction
CAA Clean Air Act
CBI Confidential Business Information
CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
EST Eastern Standard Time
NAICS North American Industry Classification System
NSPS new source performance standards
NTTAA National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
PRA Paperwork Reduction Act
OMB Office of Management and Budget
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act
RWH Residential Wood Heater
UMRA Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Organization of this document. The information in this preamble is
organized as follows:

I. General Information
    A. Does this action apply to me?
    B. Where can I get a copy of this document and other related
information?
II. Background
    A. Statutory Background
    B. What action is the Agency taking?
III. Why is the Agency taking this action?
IV. Summary of Cost, Environmental, and Economic Impacts
V. Labeling Provisions
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
    A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
    B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
    C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
    D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
    E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
    F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
    G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
    H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
    I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
    J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
    K. Application of CAA Section 307(d)

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    Table 1 lists the categories and entities that are the subject of
this proposal. Table 1 is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide for readers regarding the entities that this proposed
action is likely to affect. The proposed revisions, if finalized, will
be directly applicable to the affected entities. Federal, state, local,
and tribal government entities will not be affected by this proposed
action. Table 1 lists the types of entities that the EPA is now aware
could potentially be affected by this action. Other types of entities
not listed in the table could also be affected. To determine whether
your entity is affected by this action, you should carefully examine
the applicability criteria found in 40 CFR part 60, subpart AAA, 40 CFR
60.530 and 40 CFR part 60, subpart QQQQ, 40 CFR 60.5472. If you have
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.

       Table 1--Source Categories Affected by This Proposed Action
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Examples of entities
            Category             NAICS code \1\   that could be affected
                                                      by this action
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Residential Wood Heating.......          333414  Manufacturers, owners,
                                                  and operators of wood
                                                  heaters, pellet
                                                  heaters/stoves, and
                                                  hydronic heaters.
                                         333415  Manufacturers, owners,
                                                  and operators of
                                                  forced-air furnaces.
Retailers......................          423730  Warm air heating and
                                                  air-conditioning
                                                  equipment and supplies
                                                  merchant wholesalers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North American Industry Classification System.

B. Where can I get a copy of this document and other related
information?

    In addition to being available in the docket, an electronic copy of
this action is available on the internet. Following signature by the
EPA Administrator, the EPA will post a copy of this proposed action at
https://www.epa.gov/residential-wood-heaters. Following publication in
the Federal Register, the EPA will post the Federal Register version of
the proposal and key technical documents at this same website.
    A redline version of the regulatory language that incorporates the
proposed changes in this action is available in the docket for this
action (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0195).

II. Background

A. Statutory Background

    Section 111 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires the EPA
Administrator to list categories of stationary sources that, in his or
her judgment, cause or contribute significantly to air pollution which
may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. The
EPA must then issue ``standards of performance'' for new sources in
such source categories. The EPA has the authority to define the source
categories, determine the pollutants for which standards should be
developed, and identify within each source category the facilities for
which standards of performance will be established.
    CAA section 111(a)(1) defines ``a standard of performance'' as ``a
standard for emissions of air pollutants which reflects the degree of
emission limitation achievable through the application of the best
system of emission reduction which (taking into account the cost of
achieving such reduction and any non-air quality health and
environmental impact and energy requirement) the Administrator
determines has been adequately demonstrated.'' This definition makes
clear that the standard of performance must be based on ``the best
system of emission reduction (BSER).'' The standard that the EPA
develops, based on the BSER, is commonly a numerical emission limit,
expressed as a performance level. As provided in CAA section 111(b)(5),
the EPA does not prescribe a specific technology that must be used to
comply with a standard of performance. Rather, sources generally can
select any measure or combination of measures that will achieve the
emission level of the standard.

B. What action is the Agency taking?

    The EPA is proposing amendments to mitigate the impact of the
ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on retailers who have lost valuable sales
opportunities during the closures, stay-at-home orders, and other
precautions taken to address the pandemic. The EPA is proposing to
amend 40 CFR 60.532(b) of 40 CFR part 60, subpart AAA, to allow an
affected residential wood heater manufactured or imported on or before
May 15, 2020, and certified to meet the 2015 particulate matter
emission limit specified in 40 CFR 60.532(a), to be sold at retail on
or before November 30, 2020. The EPA is also proposing to amend 40 CFR
60.5474(a)(2) of 40 CFR part 60, subpart QQQQ, to allow an affected
residential hydronic heater manufactured or imported on or before May
15, 2020, and certified to meet the 2015 particulate matter emission
limit specified in 40 CFR 60.5474(b)(1), to be sold at retail on or
before November 30, 2020. Finally, the EPA is proposing to amend 40 CFR
60.5474(a)(6) of 40 CFR part 60, subpart QQQQ, to allow an affected
residential forced-air furnace manufactured or imported on or before
May 15, 2020, and certified to meet the applicable 2016 and 2017
particulate matter emission limits specified in 40 CFR 60.5474(b)(4)
and (5), respectively, to be sold at retail on or before November 30,
2020. The EPA is proposing to make conforming changes in the compliance
certification requirements (40 CFR 60.533(h)(1) and (2) of 40 CFR part
60, subpart AAA, and 40 CFR 60.5475(a)(3) through (7) and (h) of 40 CFR
part 60, subpart QQQQ) so that the compliance certification reflects
the November 30, 2020, proposed date when applicable.
    If these proposed revisions are finalized, we propose to make the
revisions effective upon publication of the final rule in the Federal
Register.
    This action is unlikely to affect the total number of Step 1 units
available on the market because the prohibition on manufacture of these
units after May 15, 2020, remains. Therefore, this action allows
manufacturers and retailers, of which 90 percent are small businesses,
to recover the sales opportunities they would have had in the absence
of the pandemic.

III. Why is the Agency taking this action?

    Residential wood heaters were originally listed under CAA section
111(b) on February 18, 1987 (see 52 FR 5065). Once listed, the EPA
developed NSPS to implement section 111(b) of the CAA. The standards
apply to new stationary sources of emissions, i.e., sources whose
construction, reconstruction, or modification begins after a standard
for those sources is proposed. The NSPS for wood heaters (40 CFR part
60, subpart AAA) was proposed on February 18, 1987 (see 52 FR 4994) and
promulgated on February 26, 1988 (see 53 FR 5859) (1988 Wood Heater
NSPS). The NSPS was amended in 1998 to address an issue related to
certification testing (see 63 FR 64869).
    On February 3, 2014, the EPA proposed revisions to the NSPS (see 79
FR 6330) and promulgated revisions on March 16, 2015 (see 80 FR 13672).
The final 2015 NSPS updated the 1988 Wood Heater NSPS emission limits,
eliminated exemptions over a broad suite of residential wood combustion
devices, and updated test methods and the certification process. The
2015 NSPS also added a new subpart (40 CFR part 60, subpart QQQQ) that
covers new wood burning residential hydronic heaters and new forced-air
furnaces.
    The Residential Wood Heater source category is different from most
NSPS source categories in that it regulates mass-produced residential
consumer appliance products, rather than industrial facilities. Thus,
important elements in determining the BSER include the costs and
environmental impacts on consumers of delaying production while wood
heating devices are designed, tested, field evaluated, and certified.
Section 111(b)(1)(B) of the CAA requires that the standards be
effective upon the promulgation of the NSPS. Considering these factors,
as discussed more fully in the 2015 Federal Register document, the 2015
NSPS final rule took a two-step compliance approach, in which certain
Step 1 standards became effective on May 15, 2015, and more stringent
Step 2 standards would become effective 5 years later, on May 15, 2020.
In particular, one of the bases for the Step 2 limits and deadline was
that 5 years was sufficient time for manufaturers to develop models to
meet the more stringent Step 2 standards and for retailers to
transition from selling Step 1 units to Step 2 units. Providing this 5
year time period was a key aspect of the 2015 rule because, pursuant to
CAA 111(a)(1), the stringency of a standard of performance under CAA
111 must reflect ``the degree of emission limitation achievable''
through the application of the best system of emission reduction. In
turn, what is achievable is dependent on how much ``lead time'' sources
have to meet the standard. See Portland Cement Assn. v. Ruckelshaus,
486 F.2d 375, 391-92 (D.C. Cir. 1973). According to industry

representatives, the time lost due to the pandemic has impacted
manufacturers as well as retailers because manufacturers will be
required to repurchase some unsold units from retailers.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Letter from Jack Goldman, Hearth, Patio & Barbecue
Association to Andrew Wheeler, U.S. EPA, dated March 24, 2020. See
page 2, ``In addition, some of our members supply major home center
chains, and report that over $10 million worth of product will not
sell in time and must be repurchased. This may even call into
question the continued existence of these small manufacturers.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The 2015 rule provided that retailers would have until May 15,
2020, to sell heaters and furnaces that were certified to meet the Step
1 limits. Based on the current NSPS, all units sold after May 15, 2020,
must meet the more stringent Step 2 standards. Hence, under the current
rule, units certified to meet Step 1 standards may no longer be sold
after May 15, 2020.
    On November 30, 2018, the EPA proposed (see 83 FR 61574) to amend
40 CFR part 60, subpart QQQQ, to allow a ``sell-through'' provision to
give retailers additional time after the May 2020 effective date of the
Step 2 standard to sell Step 1-compliant hydronic heaters and forced-
air furnaces remaining in their inventory. The EPA also took comment on
whether to amend 40 CFR part 60, subpart AAA, for wood heaters and
pellet fuel heaters to provide a similar sell-through period.
    Based on the comments and data received, the EPA decided to take
final action on the proposed sell-through provisions by not
promulgating such provisions, because insufficient relevant data were
submitted to substantiate a rule revision to provide a sell-through
provision (see 85 FR 18448). The EPA solicited comment via a range of
questions in the proposal. While manufacturers and retailers made
qualitative statements asserting economic harm from stranded
inventories if a retail sell-through was not allowed, these statements
were generally not supported by actual data and did not demonstrate
that the 5-year period provided by the 2015 rule was not sufficient
time to meet the Step 2 deadline.
    In a recent turn of events, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in
very significant losses of retail sales \3\ beginning about March 15
and expected to continue through May 15, 2020 (the deadline for the
Step 2 standards), due to substantial temporary closure of stores, stay
at home directives, and the overall focus on addressing the challenges
posed by the pandemic. This situation has resulted in a loss of about
60 days of the remaining time retailers were authorized to sell
remaining Step 1 units, and, thus, deprived them of the full 5-year
time period that formed the basis for the Step 2 standards and deadline
set in the 2015 rule. In the absence of the COVID-19 pandemic,
retailers would have been working diligently throughout this 60-day
period to sell Step 1 devices by offering discounts, sales events, and
other incentives before the May 15, 2020, deadline. In this proposed
rule, EPA is proposing to provide time for retailers to sell Step 1
devices to ensure they get the full benefit of the 5 year ``lead time''
on which the Step 2 standards were based by replacing the time period
for sales opportunities that lost due to COVID-19.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Letter from Jack Goldman, Hearth, Patio & Barbecue
Association to Andrew Wheeler, U.S. EPA, dated March 24, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is difficult to precisely replace the lost sales opportunities
resulting from the lost 60 days. First, there is still significant
uncertainty with regard to when the pandemic will subside enough such
that retailers can reopen, re-hire staff who have been temporarily
laid-off, and resume a level of normal retail operations.
    Second, summer months are typically a very low selling season for
wood heating devices.\4\ Thus, simply providing an additional 60 days
during the summer would not replace the sales opportunities lost due to
the steps taken to protect public health during the pandemic and, thus,
not replace the time lost from the 5-year period that was contemplated
in the 2015 rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 2018 December Business Climate Report in Hearth and Home
Magazine, dated February 2019, showing monthly sales data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For all of these reasons, to ensure retailers will regain the sales
opportunities lost as a result of the closures, shut-down orders, and
other precautions taken due to the pandemic during the last 60 days
leading up to May 15, 2020, the EPA is proposing to allow retailers to
sell Step 1 certified wood heating devices from the date of
promulgation, if this proposal is promulgated, until November 30, 2020.
In addition, in light of the above, during the period between May 15,
2020, and publication of EPA's final action on this proposal, EPA will
treat the sale of Step 1 devices as a low enforcement priority.

IV. Summary of Cost, Environmental, and Economic Impacts

    The COVID-19 pandemic is causing an unanticipated impact (mandatory
store closures, loss of sales, excess stranded inventory) that the
proposed rule will help to mitigate. This action roughly replaces the
60 days of sales opportunities that retailers would have otherwise had
in the absence of the pandemic.
    The EPA understands that there may be impacts from this proposed
action, if it is finalized as proposed. We are unable to quantify what,
if any, impacts there may be and seek public comments to help inform us
of any potential impacts. We are placing the Supplemental Regulatory
Impact Analysis (RIA) from the 2018 proposed ``sell-through'' in the
docket as an illustration of what impacts of additional sales time
could look like.

V. Labeling Provisions

    The EPA is aware of a potential issue that could be faced by
retailers selling Step 1 units during the proposed sales period that
would begin well after May 15, 2020, and run to November 30, 2020. Both
subparts, 40 CFR part 60, subpart AAA, and 40 CFR part 60, subpart
QQQQ, contain requirements for permanent labels to be affixed to
affected units as required in 40 CFR 60.536(b) of 40 CFR part 60,
subpart AAA, and 40 CFR 60.5478(b) of 40 CFR part 60, subpart QQQQ, as
applicable. Under these provisions, such labels must display a
statement that the unit is ``U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Certified to comply with the 2015 {or other applicable standard{time}
particulate emission standards. Not approved for sale after May 15,
2020.'' The statement that the unit is ``Not approved for sale after
May 15, 2020'' could confuse consumers who might not understand that
(if the proposed sell-through is finalized), such units could, in fact,
legally be sold after May 15, 2020, and until November 30, 2020. To
address this potential issue, if the proposed sales period is
finalized, retailers would be allowed to notify potential customers
with signs, decals, hangtags or other types of signage communicating
that retailers are allowed to sell, and consumers are allowed to
purchase, the Step 1 devices until November 30, 2020, notwithstanding
the label that is required to be permanently affixed to the unit. The
EPA notes that, even if the proposed sales period is finalized, no
person may remove or alter the existing permanent label that is
required to be affixed to the unit.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is a significant regulatory action that was submitted
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review because it has
novel legal and policy issues. Any changes made in response to OMB
recommendations have been documented in the docket.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose any new information collection burden
under the PRA. The OMB has previously approved the information
collection activities contained in the existing regulations and has
assigned OMB control numbers 2060-0161 (40 CFR part 60, subpart AAA)
and 2060-0693 (40 CFR part 60, subpart QQQQ). This action is believed
to result in no changes to the information collection requirements of
the 2015 NSPS, so that the information collection estimate of project
cost and hour burden from the 2015 final rule have not been revised.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In
making this determination, the impact of concern is any significant
adverse economic impact on small entities. An agency may certify that a
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, has no
net burden, or otherwise has a positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. This action provides sufficient time to
retailers of Step 1 residential wood heaters and residential hydronic
heaters and forced-air furnaces, including the 90% of them that are
small businesses, to sell inventory that would otherwise be stranded
due to the lost sales time as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic
situation without an extension of the Step 2 compliance date.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The action imposes
no enforceable duty on any state, local, or tribal governments or the
private sector.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the National Government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This action does not change any requirements for
affected entities, including tribes. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does
not apply to this action. Consistent with the EPA Policy on
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribes, the EPA will provide
outreach through the National Tribal Air Association and will offer
consultation to tribal officials.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations, and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The
amendments will not have a significant effect on emissions.

K. Application of CAA Section 307(d)

    Pursuant to CAA section 307(d)(1)(C), this action is subject to the
provisions of CAA section 307(d). To the extent that any aspect of this
rule is not within the scope of CAA section 307(d)(1)(C), pursuant to
CAA section 307(d)(1)(V), the Administrator determines that this action
is subject to the provisions of CAA section 307(d). Section
307(d)(1)(V) of the CAA provides that the provisions of CAA section
307(d) apply to ``such other actions as the Administrator may
determine.''

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 60

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure.

Andrew Wheeler,
Administrator.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 60 is
proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 60--STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES

0
1. The authority citation for part 60 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart AAA--Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood
Heaters

0
2. Section 60.532 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:

Sec.  60.532   What standards and associated requirements must I meet
and by when?

* * * * *
    (b) 2020 particulate matter emission standards. Unless exempted
under Sec.  60.530(b) or electing to use the cord wood alternative
means of compliance option in paragraph (c) of the section, each
affected wood heater manufactured or sold at retail for use in the
United States on or after May 15, 2020, must not discharge into the
atmosphere any gases that contain particulate matter in excess of a
weighted average of 2.0 g/hr (0.0044 lb/hr). However, an affected wood
heater manufactured or imported on or before May 15, 2020, and
certified as of May 15, 2020, to meet the 2015 particulate matter
emission limit in paragraph (a) of this section may be sold at retail
on or before November 30, 2020. Compliance for all heaters must be
determined by the test methods and procedures in Sec.  60.534.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 60.533 is amended by revising paragraphs (h)(1) and (2) to
read as follows:

Sec.  60.533   What compliance and certification requirements must I
meet and by when?

* * * * *
    (h) * * *
    (1) For a model line that was previously certified as meeting the
1990 Phase II emission standards under the 1988 new source performance
standards (NSPS), in effect prior to May 15, 2015, at an emission level
equal to or less than the 2015 emission standards in Sec.  60.532(a),
the model line is deemed to have a certificate of compliance for the
2015 emission standards in Sec.  60.532(a), which is valid until the
effective date for the 2020 standards in Sec.  60.532(b) (i.e., until
May 15, 2020). However, a model line, manufactured or imported on or
before May 15, 2020, with a certificate of compliance for the 2015
emission standards that was in effect as of May 15, 2020, may be sold
at retail on or before November 30, 2020.
    (2) For a model line certified as meeting emission standards in
Sec.  60.532, a certificate of compliance will be valid for 5 years
from the date of issuance or until a more stringent standard comes into
effect, whichever is sooner. However, a model line, manufactured or
imported on or before May 15, 2020, with a certificate of compliance
for the 2015 emission standards that was in effect as of May 15, 2020,
may be sold at retail on or before November 30, 2020.
* * * * *

Subpart QQQQ--Standards of Performance for New Residential Hydronic
Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces

0
4. Section 60.5474 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(2) and (6) to
read as follows:

Sec.  60.5474   What standards and requirements must I meet and by
when?

    (a) * * *
    (2) On or after May 15, 2020, manufacture or sell at retail a
residential hydronic heater unless it has been certified to meet the
2020 particulate matter emission limit in paragraph (b)(2) or (3) of
this section, except that a residential hydronic heater manufactured or
imported on or before May 15, 2020, and certified as of May 15, 2020,
to meet the 2015 particulate matter emission limit in paragraph (b)(1)
of this section, may be sold at retail on or before November 30, 2020.
* * * * *
    (6) On or after May 15, 2020, manufacture or sell at retail a small
or large residential forced-air furnace unless it has been certified to
meet the 2020 particulate matter emission limit in paragraph (b)(6) of
this section, except that a small or large residential forced-air
furnace manufactured or imported on or before May 15, 2020, and
certified as of May 15, 2020, to meet the applicable particulate matter
emission limit in paragraph (b)(4) or (5) of this section,
respectively, may be sold at retail on or before November 30, 2020.
* * * * *
0
5. Section 60.5475 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(3) through (7)
and (h) to read as follows:

Sec.  60.5475   What compliance and certification requirements must I
meet and by when?

    (a) * * *
    (3) Models qualified as meeting the Phase 2 emission levels under
the 2011 EPA hydronic heater partnership agreement are automatically
deemed to have a certificate of compliance for the 2015 particulate
matter emission standards and be valid until the effective date for the
2020 particulate matter emission standards in Sec.  60.5474. However, a
model line, manufactured or imported on or before May 15, 2020, with a
certificate of compliance for the 2015 emission standards that was in
effect as of May 15, 2020, may be sold at retail on or before November
30, 2020.
    (4) Models certified by the New York State Department of
Environment and Conservation to meet the emission levels in Sec.
60.5474(b) are automatically deemed to have a certificate of compliance
for the 2015 particulate matter emission standards and be valid until
the effective date for the 2020 particulate matter emission standards
in Sec.  60.5474. However, a model line, manufactured or imported on or
before May 15, 2020, with a certificate of compliance for the 2015
emission standards that was in effect as of May 15, 2020, may be sold
at retail on or before November 30, 2020.
    (5) Models approved by the New York State Energy Research and
Development Authority under the Renewable Heat New York (RHNY) Biomass
Boiler Program are automatically deemed to have a certificate of
compliance for the 2015 particulate matter emission standards and be
valid until the effective date for the 2020 particulate matter emission
standards in Sec.  60.5474 provided that they comply with the thermal
storage requirements in the RHNY program. However, a model line,
manufactured or imported on or before May 15, 2020, with a certificate
of compliance for the 2015 emission standards that was in effect as of
May 15, 2020, may be sold at retail on or before November 30, 2020.
    (6) Small forced-air furnace models that are certified under CSA
B415.1-10 (IBR, see Sec.  60.17), by an EPA approved third-party
certifier, to meet the 2016 particulate matter emission level will be
automatically deemed to have a certificate of compliance for the 2016
particulate matter emission standards and be valid until the effective
date for the 2020 particulate matter emission standards in Sec.
60.5474. However, a model line, manufactured or imported on or before
May 15, 2020, with a certificate of compliance for the 2016 emission
standards that was in effect as of May 15, 2020, may be sold at retail
on or before November 30, 2020.
    (7) Large forced-air furnace models that are certified under CSA
B415.1-10 (IBR, see Sec.  60.17), by an EPA approved third-party
certifier, to meet the 2017 particulate matter emission level will be
automatically deemed to have a certificate of compliance for the 2017
particulate matter emission standards and be valid until the effective
date of the 2020 particulate matter emission standards in Sec.
60.5474. However, a model line, manufactured or imported on or before
May 15, 2020, with a certificate of compliance for the 2017 emission
standards that was in effect as of May 15, 2020, may be sold at retail
on or before November 30, 2020.
* * * * *
    (h) Certification period. Unless revoked sooner by the
Administrator, a certificate of compliance will be valid for 5 years
from the date of issuance or until a more stringent standard comes into
effect, whichever is sooner. However, a model line, manufactured or
imported on or before May 15, 2020, with a certificate of compliance
for the applicable 2015, 2016, or 2017 emission standards that was in
effect as of May 15, 2020, may be sold at retail on or before November
30, 2020.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-11096 Filed 5-21-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 5, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8063-8066]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02432]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2012-1001]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zones; Annual Firework Displays Within the Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound Area of Responsibility, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to add three new fireworks events and
to correct the location of five existing events to ensure public safety
during annual firework displays at various locations in the Captain of
the Port (COTP), Puget Sound Area of Responsibility (AOR). When these
safety zones are activated and subject to enforcement, this rule would
limit the movement of vessels within the established firework display
areas. These additions and corrections are necessary to prevent injury
and to protect life and property of the maritime public from hazards
associated with firework displays.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before April 8, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-1001 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email ENS Nathaniel P. Clinger, Coast Guard Sector Puget
Sound, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (206)
217-6045, email

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2012-1001), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online at http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered received by the Coast Guard when
you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be considered as having been received by the
Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name and a mailing address, an email
address, or a telephone number in the body of your document so that we
can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2012-1001] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number ``USCG-2012-1001'' in the ``SEARCH'' box and
click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated
with this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility
in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

4. Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

B. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard published the following Temporary Final Rules:
Safety Zones; Multiple Firework Displays in Captain of the Port, Puget
Sound Area of Responsibility, 2010 Docket No. USCG-2010-0591, 2011
Docket No. USCG-2011-0450, and 2012 Docket No. USCG-2012-0488. The
Coast Guard received no negative comments or complaints pertaining to
these rules.

C. Basis and Purpose

    There is a need to correct the coordinates of five firework
displays outlined in 33 CFR 165.1332, located within the greater Puget
Sound Area, to accurately reflect the correct position of the firework
displays. Additionally, three new firework display locations have been
added to area, and the title of the rule does not accurately reflect
what is codified in 33 CFR 3.65-10. These corrections and additions are
necessary in order to restrict vessel movement and reduce vessel
congregation in the proximity of firework discharge sites ensuring
maritime public safety.

D. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    This rule proposes to amend the following firework display
positions: City of Renton Fireworks. Coordinates will be revised to
read: latitude 47[deg] 30.386' N, longitude 122[deg] 12.502' W;
Bainbridge Island Fireworks. Coordinates will be revised to read:
latitude 47[deg] 37.142' N, longitude 122[deg] 30.397' W; Port Townsend
Sunrise Rotary. Coordinates will be revised to read: latitude 48[deg]
08.413' N, longitude 122[deg] 45.531' W; Tacoma Freedom Fair.
Coordinates will be revised to read: latitude 47[deg] 17.103' N,
longitude 122[deg] 28.410' W; Brewster 4th of July. Coordinates will be
revised to read: latitude 48[deg] 05.362' N, longitude 119[deg] 47.147'
W.
    This rule proposes to add the following firework displays: Port
Ludlow Fireworks, latitude 47[deg] 55.161' N, longitude 122[deg]
41.157' W; Boston Harbor 4th of July, latitude 47[deg] 08.626' N,
longitude 122[deg] 54.149' W; Everett 4th of July, latitude 48[deg]
00.672' N, 122[deg] 13.391' W.
    These safety zones will extend 450 yards from their launch site.
This zone size allows for the use of up to a 16'' mortar shell in
annual firework displays. However, safety zones will be only be
enforced for the appropriate size for the largest mortar shell used.
These zones are nominal in size and are typically positioned in areas
which allow for transit around the zone. Thus, these zones have an
inconsequential impact on the majority of waterway users. These zones
are also short in duration and allow waterway users to enter or transit
through the zone when deemed safe by the on-scene patrol commander.
Through this action, the COTP intends to promote the safety of
personnel, vessels, and facilities in the area.

E. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and

does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or under section 1 of
Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under those Orders. The Coast Guard bases this finding on
the fact that the safety zones listed will be in place for a limited
period of time and are minimal in duration, and vessel traffic will be
able to transit around the safety zones.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The term
``Small entities'' comprises small business, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule would affect the following
entities, some of which may be small entities; the owners and operators
of vessels intending to operate in the waters covered by the safety
zone while it is in effect. This rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because the
safety zone would be in place for limited periods of time and maritime
traffic would still be able to transit around the safety zone. Maritime
traffic may also request permission to transit through the zone from
the COTP, Puget Sound or a Designated Representative.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the ``For Further
Information Contact'' section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category
of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This rule involves the amendment of
safety zones listed in 33 CFR 165.1332. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination
are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek
any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306,
3707; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1

0
2. In Sec.  165.1332, amend the table in paragraph (a)(1) by:
    a. Revising the entries for ``City of Renton Fireworks,''
``Bainbridge Island Fireworks,'' and ``Port Townsend Sunrise Rotary'';
and
    b. Adding entries for ``Tacoma Freedom Fair,'' ``Brewster 4th of
July,'' ``Port Ludlow Fireworks,'' ``Boston Harbor 4th of July,'' and
``Everett 4th of July.''
    The revisions and additions read as follows:

Sec.  165.1332  Safety Zones; Annual Fireworks Displays within the
Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone.

    (a) * * *
    (1) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Event name                  Event location              Latitude                   Longitude
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
City of Renton Fireworks..........  Renton, Lake           47[deg] 30.386' N.........  122[deg] 12.502' W
                                     Washington.

                                                  * * * * * * *
Bainbridge Island Fireworks.......  Eagle Harbor.........  47[deg] 37.142' N.........  122[deg] 30.397' W

                                                  * * * * * * *
Port Townsend Sunrise Rotary......  Port Townsend........  47[deg] 08.413' N.........  122[deg] 45.531' W

                                                  * * * * * * *
Tacoma Freedom Fair...............  Commencement Bay.....  47[deg] 17.103' N.........  122[deg] 28.410' W
Brewster 4th of July..............  Brewster.............  48[deg] 05.362' N.........  119[deg] 47.147' W
Port Ludlow Fireworks.............  Port Ludlow..........  47[deg] 55.161' N.........  122[deg] 41.157' W
Boston Harbor 4th of July.........  Boston Harbor........  47[deg] 08.626' N.........  122[deg] 54.149' W
Everett 4th of July...............  Port Gardner.........  48[deg] 00.672' N.........  122[deg] 13.391' W
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

    Dated: January 14, 2013.
S. J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2013-02432 Filed 2-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P