[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35949-35950]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15289]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER10-2211-004.
    Applicants: Vandolah Power Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Supplement to December 24, 2014 Triennial Compliance
Filing of Vandolah Power Company, L.L.C.
    Filed Date: 06/08/2015.
    Accession Number: 20150608-5264.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/29/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2231-004; ER10-1511-004; ER10-1714-004.
    Applicants: Kentucky Utilities Company, LG&E Energy Marketing Inc.,
PPL EnergyPlus LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Fourth Supplement to June 30, 2014 Triennial Market
Power Update of the PPL Southeast Companies.
    Filed Date: 06/05/2015.
    Accession Number: 20150605-5244.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/26/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2265-005; ER12-21-016; ER11-2211-005; ER11-
2209-005; ER11-2210-005; ER11-2207-005; ER11-2206-005; ER13-1150-003;
ER13-1151-003; ER10-2783-011; ER10-2784-011 ; ER11-2855-016 ; ER10-
2791-011; ER10-2333-004; ER10-2792-011; ER14-1818-005; ER12-1238-004;
ER10-2260-003; ER10-2261-003; ER10-2337-006; ER14-1668-002; ER14-1669-
002 ; ER14-1674-002; ER14-1670-002; ER14-1671-002; ER14-1675-002; ER14-
1673-002; ER14-1676-002; ER14-1677-002; ER14-1678-002; ER14-1679-002;
ER14-1672-002; ER10-2795-011; ER10-2798-011; ER10-1575-009; ER10-2339-
007; ER10-2338-007; ER10-2340-007; ER12-1239-004; ER10-2336-004; ER10-
2335-004; ER10-2799-011; ER10-2801-011; ER10-2385-005; ER11-3727-011;
ER10-2262-002; ER12-2413-009; ER11-2062-014; ER10-2346-006; ER10-2812-
010; ER10-1291-015; ER10-2843-009; ER11-2508-013; ER11-2863-008; ER11-
4307-014; ER10-2347-004; ER10-2348-004; ER12-1711-011; ER10-2350-004;
ER10-2846-011; ER12-261-013.
    Applicants: NRG Power Marketing LLC, Agua Caliente Solar, LLC, Alta
Wind I, LLC, Alta Wind II, LLC, Alta Wind III, LLC, Alta Wind IV, LLC,
Alta Wind V, LLC, Alta Wind X, LLC, Alta Wind XI, LLC, Arthur Kill
Power LLC, Astoria Gas Turbine Power LLC, Avenal Park LLC, Bayou Cove
Peaking Power, LLC, Bendwind, LLC, Big Cajun I Peaking Power LLC,
Boston Energy Trading and Marketing LLC, Broken Bow Wind, LLC, Cabrillo
Power I LLC, Cabrillo Power II LLC, CL Power Sales Eight, L.L.C.,
Community Wind North 1 LLC, Community Wind North 2 LLC, Community Wind
North 3 LLC, Community Wind North 5 LLC, Community Wind North 6 LLC,
Community Wind North 7 LLC, Community Wind North 8 LLC, Community Wind
North 9 LLC, Community Wind North 10 LLC, Community Wind North 11 LLC,
Community Wind North 13 LLC, Community Wind North 15 LLC, Conemaugh
Power LLC, Connecticut Jet Power LLC, Cottonwood Energy Company LP, CP
Power Sales Seventeen, L.L.C., CP Power Sales Nineteen, L.L.C., CP
Power Sales Twenty, L.L.C., Crofton Bluffs Wind, LLC, DeGreeff DP, LLC,
DeGreeffpa, LLC, Devon Power LLC, Dunkirk Power LLC, Elkhorn Ridge
Wind, LLC, El Segundo Energy Center LLC, El Segundo Power, LLC, Energy
Alternatives Wholesale, LLC, Energy Plus Holdings LLC, Forward
WindPower LLC, GenConn Devon LLC, GenConn Energy LLC, GenConn
Middletown LLC, GenOn Energy Management, LLC, GenOn Mid-Atlantic, LLC,
Green Mountain Energy Company, Groen Wind, LLC, High Lonesome Mesa,
LLC, High Plains Ranch II, LLC, Hillcrest Wind, LLC, Huntley Power LLC,
Independence Energy Group LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of NRG MBR
Sellers [Part 1].
    Filed Date: 6/8/15.
    Accession Number: 20150608-5265.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/29/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2777-003.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., Ameren
Illinois Company.
    Description: Offer of Settlement [including Pro Forma sheets] of
Ameren Services Company on behalf of Ameren Illinois Company, et al.
    Filed Date: 06/08/2015.
    Accession Number: 20150608-5258.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/29/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-104-007.
    Applicants: Florida Power & Light Company.
    Description: Compliance filing per 35: FPL Order No. 1000 Further
Regional Compliance Filings to be effective 1/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 6/9/15.
    Accession Number: 20150609-5070.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/29/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1934-004; ER14-1935-004.
    Applicants: Rising Tree Wind Farm LLC, Rising Tree Wind Farm II
LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of Rising Tree
Wind Farm LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 6/9/15.
    Accession Number: 20150609-5080.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1542-001.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing per 35: 2015-06-09_SA 2779
Compliance ATC-Wisconsin Electric CFA to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 6/9/15.
    Accession Number: 20150609-5027.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/15.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
reliability filings.
    Docket Numbers: RD15-5-000.
    Applicants: North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
    Description: Petition of the North American Electric Reliability
Corporation for Approval of Proposed Reliability Standards PRC-004-5
and PRC-010-2.
    Filed Date: 06/08/2015.
    Accession Number: 20150608-5260.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/9/15.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/

docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866)
208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: June 9, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-15289 Filed 6-22-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 178 (Friday, September 17, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 51823]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20098]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2021-0024]

Special Local Regulation; Marine Events Within the Eleventh Coast
Guard District--Swim for Special Operations Forces

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notification of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the special local regulation on
the waters of San Diego Bay, San Diego, California during the Honor
Foundation Swim for Special Operations Forces (SOF) on September 18,
2021. This special local regulation is necessary to provide for the
safety of the participants, crew, sponsor vessels of the swim event,
and general users of the waterway. During the enforcement period,
persons and vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring within this regulated area unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port, or his designated representative.

DATES: The regulation in 33 CFR 100.1101, Table 1 to Sec.  100.1101,
Item No. 16, will be enforced from 8 a.m. until 12:30 p.m., on
September 18, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notification of enforcement, call or email Lieutenant Commander John
Santorum, Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego, CA;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the special
local regulation in 33 CFR 100.1101, Table 1 to Sec.  100.1101, Item
No. 16, from 8 a.m. through 12:30 p.m. on September 18, 2021 for the
Honor Foundation Swim for SOF in San Diego, CA. This action is being
taken to provide for the safety of life on navigable waterways during
the swim event. Our regulation for recurring marine events in the San
Diego Captain of the Port Zone, Sec.  100.1101, Table 1 to Sec.
100.1101, Item No. 16, specifies the location of the regulated area for
the Honor Foundation Swim for SOF, CA, which encompasses portions of
San Diego Bay. Under the provisions of Sec.  100.1101, persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within this regulated area unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port, or his designated representative. The Coast Guard may be
assisted by other Federal, State, or local law enforcement agencies in
enforcing this regulation.
    In addition to this document in the Federal Register, the Coast
Guard will provide the maritime community with advance notification of
this enforcement period via the Local Notice to Mariners and marine
information broadcasts.

    Dated: September 13, 2021.
T.J. Barelli,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2021-20098 Filed 9-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: November 27, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 227)]
[Notices]
[Page 68601-68603]
[DOCID:fr27no06-94]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[FERC Docket No. PF06-36-000]

Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed High Plains Expansion
Project; Request for Comments on Environmental Issues, and Notice of
Site Visit and Open House Meeting Attendance

November 17, 2006.
    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) that
discusses the environmental impacts of the High Plains Expansion
Project (project) involving construction and operation of by Colorado
Interstate Gas Company (CIG) in Weld, Morgan, and Adams Counties,
Colorado. These facilities would consist of about 170 miles of 24-inch
and 30-inch-diameter pipeline in four separate pipeline segments. The
EIS will be used by the Commission in its decision making process to
determine if the project is in the public convenience and necessity.
    The project is currently in the preliminary stages of design and at
this time a formal application has not been filed with the Commission.
For this project, the Commission is initiating the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review prior to receiving the formal
application. This pre-filing process allows interested stakeholders to
become involved early in the project planning and to identify and
resolve issues before a formal application is filed with the FERC. A
docket number (PF06-36-000) has been established to place information
filed by CIG and related documents issued or received by the
Commission, into the public record.\1\ Once a formal application is
filed with the FERC, a new docket number will be established.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ To view information in the docket, follow the instructions
for using the eLibrary link at the end of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces the opening of the scoping period that will
be used to gather environmental input from the public and interested
agencies on the Project. Please note that the scoping period will close
on January 6, 2007. Details on how to submit comments are provided in
the Public Participation section of this notice.
    This notice is being sent to potentially affected landowners along
the Project route; federal, state, and local government agencies;
elected officials; environmental and public interest groups; Native
American tribes; and local libraries and newspapers.
    With this notice, we \2\ are asking federal, state, and local
agencies with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect to
environmental issues to cooperate with us in the preparation of the
EIS. These agencies may choose to participate once they have evaluated
the proposal relative to their responsibilities. Agencies which would
like to request cooperating status should follow the instructions for
filing comments described later in this notice. We encourage government
representatives to notify their constituents of this planned project
and encourage them to comment on their areas of concern.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ ``We,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the environmental staff
of the Office of Energy Projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Some affected landowners may be contacted by a project
representative about the acquisition of an easement to construct,
operate, and maintain the proposed pipeline. If so, the company should
seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement. In the event that
the Project is certificated by the Commission, that approval conveys
the right of eminent domain for securing easements for the pipeline.
Therefore, if easement negotiations fail to produce an agreement, the
company could initiate condemnation proceedings in accordance with
state law.
    A fact sheet prepared by the FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural
Gas Facility On My Land? What Do I Need To Know?'' addresses a number
of typically asked questions, including the use of eminent domain and
how to participate in the Commission's proceedings. It is available for
viewing on the FERC Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov).

Summary of the Proposed Project

    CIG is proposing to expand its existing pipeline system along
Colorado's Front Range in order to provide additional transportation
services to this rapidly growing market. Specifically, CIG is proposing
to construct approximately 170 miles of 24-inch and 30-inch-diameter
pipeline in four separate pipeline segments in Weld, Morgan, and Adams
Counties, Colorado as described below. The general locations of the
proposed pipelines are shown in the figure included as Appendix 1 \3\.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being
printed in the Federal Register. Copies (excluding maps) are
available on the Commission's Internet website (http://www.ferc.gov)

at the ``eLibrary'' link or from the Commission's Public Reference
Room at<PHONE_NUMBER>. For instructions on connecting to eLibrary,
refer to the end of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Project consists of the following facilities:

     Line 250A--64.5 miles of 30-inch-diameter pipe and 20.5
miles of 24-inch-diameter pipe and 2 interconnect meter station
facilities;
     Line 251A--58 miles of 24-inch-diameter pipe and 2
interconnect meter station facilities;
     Line 252A--14.9 miles of 30-inch-diameter pipe and 1
interconnect meter station facility;
     Line 253A--6.1 miles of 24-inch-diameter pipe and 2
interconnect meter station facilities;
     Seven new meter stations and eighteen new block valves;
and
     Pig launcher/receivers at the beginning and ending of the
four new pipeline segments.
    The entire project when completed would carry a total capacity of
approximately 874,000 decatherms of gas per day. CIG is requesting
approval such that the facilities are completed and put into service by
August 2008. CIG proposes to begin construction in February 2008.

Land Requirements for Construction

    CIG would use a typical 100-foot-wide construction right-of-way for
the project. Additional work area would be required at certain feature
crossings (e.g., waterbodies, wetlands, roads, and railroad crossings),
staging areas, pipe yards, contractor's yards, and widening of certain
access roads.
    Based on preliminary information, it is estimated that construction
of the proposed facilities would disturb about 2,000 acres of land. Of
the 2,000 acres, about 1,000 acres would be temporary disturbed and
about 1,000 acres would be permanently maintained for operation of the
pipeline within a 50-foot-wide permanent right-of-way, and as
aboveground facility sites.
    Following construction, all temporary workspaces would be restored
and allowed to revert to its former use.

The EIS Process

    The FERC will be the lead federal agency for the preparation of the
EIS.

NEPA requires the FERC to take into account the environmental impacts
that could result from an action when it considers whether or not an
interstate natural gas pipeline should be approved. The Commission will
use the EIS to consider the environmental impacts that could result if
the project is authorized under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act. NEPA
also requires us to identify and address concerns the public may have
about proposals to be considered by the Commission. This process is
referred to as ``scoping.'' The main goal of the scoping process is to
focus the analysis in the EIS on important environmental issues and
reasonable alternatives. By this Notice of Intent (NOI), the Commission
staff requests agency and public comments on the scope on the issues to
be addressed in the EIS. All comments received will be considered
during the preparation of the EIS.
    Although no formal application has been filed, the FERC Staff have
already initiated a NEPA review under the FERC's Pre-Filing Process,
which was established in Docket No. PF06-36-000. The purpose of the
Pre-Filing Process is to seek public and agency input early in the
project planning phase and encourage involvement by interested
stakeholders in a manner that allows for the early identification and
resolution of environmental issues. As part of the Pre-Filing Process
review, FERC staff representatives will participate in an interagency
scoping meeting in the project area to solicit comments and concerns
about the project from other jurisdictional agencies.
    With this notice, the Commission requests federal, state, and local
government agencies with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with the
respect to environmental issues to express their interest in becoming
cooperating agencies for the preparation of the EIS. These agencies may
choose to participate once they have evaluated the proposal relative to
their responsibilities. Agencies that would like to request cooperating
status should send a letter expressing that interest and expected level
of involvement to the Secretary of the Commission at the address
provided in the public participation section of this notice.
    The FERC's independent analysis of the issues will be included in a
draft EIS. The draft EIS will be mailed to federal, state, and local
government agencies; elected officials; environmental and public
interest groups; Native American tribes; affected landowners; other
interested parties; local libraries and newspapers; and the FERC's
official service list for this proceeding. A comment period will be
allotted for review of the draft EIS. We will consider all timely
comments on the draft EIS and revise the document, as necessary, before
issuing a final EIS.

Currently Identified Environmental Issues

    We have already identified a number of issues and alternatives that
they think deserve attention based on a preliminary review of the
proposed facilities and information provided by CIG. This preliminary
list of potential issues and alternatives may be changed based on your
comments and our analysis.

Geology and Soils

     Impact on agricultural lands and irrigation and canal
systems.
     Impacts on unconsolidated soils with severe erosion
potential.
     Assessment of potential geological hazards.
     Evaluation of noxious weed control.
     Construction in steep terrain.

Water Resources

     Potential effects on groundwater resources.
     Impact of open-cut crossings of irrigation canals and the
South Platte River.
     Effect of pipeline crossings on wetlands and perennial and
intermittent waterbodies.
     Assessment of hydrostatic test water sources and discharge
locations.
     Water depletions resulting from hydrostatic test water
appropriations.

Fish, Wildlife, and Vegetation

     Effect on fish and wildlife resources and their habitat,
including federally and state-listed threatened and endangered species.
     Assessment of construction time window restrictions.
     Assessment of measures to successfully revegetate the
right-of-way.

Cultural Resources

     Effect on known and undiscovered cultural resources.
     Native American and tribal concerns.

Land Use, Recreation and Special Interest Areas, and Visual Resources

     Impacts on residences, including proximity of facilities
to existing structures.
     Potential land use conflicts with planned and future
development.
     Permanent land use alteration associated with pipeline
easements.

Socioeconomics

     Benefits to local communities.
     Effects of construction workforce demands on public
services and temporary housing.

Air Quality and Noise

     Effects on local air quality and noise environment from
construction and operation of the proposed facilities.

Reliability and Safety

     Assessment of hazards associated with natural gas
pipelines.
     Assessment of security associated with operation of
natural gas facilities.

Alternatives

     The No-Action alternative.
     System alternatives.
     Route alternatives.

Cumulative Impact

     Assessment of the effect of the proposed project when
combined with other actions in the same region.

Public Participation

    You are encouraged to become involved in this process and provide
your specific comments or concerns about CIG's proposal. Your comments
should focus on the potential environmental effects, reasonable
alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental impacts.
The more specific your comments, the more useful they will be. If you
wish to mail comments, please mail your comments so that they will be
received in Washington, DC on or before January 6, 2007 and carefully
follow these instructions:
     Send an original and two copies of your letter to: Magalie
R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.
     Label one copy of your comments for the attention of Gas
2, DG2E; and
     Reference Docket No. PF06-36-000 on the original and both
copies.
     Mail your comments so that they will be received in
Washington, DC, on or before January 6, 2007.
    Please note that we are continuing to experience delays in mail
deliveries from the U.S. Postal Service. As a result, we will include
all comments that we receive within a reasonable time frame in our
environmental analysis of this project. However, the Commission
strongly encourages electronic filing of any comments to this
proceeding. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov under the ``e-Filing''

link and the link to the User's Guide. Before you can file comments,
you will need to open a free account which can be created on-line.

    CIG is sponsoring public open house meetings to provide the public
with information about the proposed project. The dates, times, and
locations of the open house meeting are listed in the table below. FERC
staff will be in attendance. For information about the open house
meetings and the site visit, please contact this CIG representative:
Jeff Voltattorni at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Date and time                           Location
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 5:30 p.m.    Ault High School, 208 W. 1st
 to 8 p.m. (MST).                         Street, Ault, Colorado 80610,
                                          Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Wednesday, November 29, 2006, 5:30 p.m.  Country Steak Out, 19592 8th
 to 8 p.m. (MST).                         Ave., Fort Morgan, Colorado
                                          80701, Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Thursday, November 30, 2006, 5:30 p.m.   Bella Sera Center, 45 Strong
 to 8 p.m. (MST).                         Street, Brighton, Colorado
                                          80601, Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to the public open house meetings, the FERC will
conduct site visits to view the proposed pipeline routes. The public
may participate in the site visits. No transportation will be provided.
Details regarding the tours are provided below.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Facilities
       Date and start time             Location            reviewed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 29, 2006, 8 a.m. (MST).  Cheyenne            Line 250A, Line
                                   Compressor          252A, and
                                   Station, 65657      northeast portion
                                   Highway 85, Carr,   of Line 251A
                                   Colorado 80612.
November 30, 2006, 8 a.m. (MST).  Watkins Compressor  Southwestern
                                   Station, 24650      portion of Line
                                   East Smith Road,    251A and Line
                                   Aurora, Colorado    253A
                                   80019.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Environmental Mailing List

    If you do not want to send comments at this time, but still want to
remain on our environmental mailing list, please return the attached
Mailing List Retention Form (Appendix 2). If you do not return the
form, or you do not file a comment on this project, you will be taken
off the environmental mailing list.
    To reduce printing and mailing costs, the draft and final EISs will
be issued in both CD-ROM and hard copy formats. The FERC strongly
encourages the use of CD-ROM format in its publication of large
documents. If you wish to receive a paper copy of the draft EIS instead
of a CD-ROM, you must indicate that choice on the return Mailing List
Retention Form (Appendix 2).

Availability of Additional Information

    Additional information about the Project is available from the
FERC's Office of External Affairs at 1-866-208-FERC or on the FERC
Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. Click

on the eLibrary link, click on ``General Search,'' and enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field
(i.e., PF06-36). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range.
For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,

contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link on the FERC Internet Web site
also provides access to the text of formal documents issued by the
Commission, such as orders, notices, and rule makings.
    In addition, the FERC now offers a free service called
eSubscription that allows you to keep track of all formal issuances and
submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time you
spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. To register for this service, go to the eSubscription
link on the FERC Internet website.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-19949 Filed 11-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


 From:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS> To:
Byron Bunker/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, <EMAIL_ADDRESS> Cc:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Date:
04/08/2011 02:51 PM
 Subject:
GHG / FE regulation:  additional suggestion

Byron, Coralie:

While sifting recent Daimler truck data into averaging categories, I noticed some anomalies caused by the use of GVWR as the sole determinant of a vehicle's class.  These are vehicles that I would intuitively classify as one type of vehicle but that the regulations classify as another.  For example:
   1.	I found about 100 of our M2 vehicle (which is primarily a Class 6, 7, or 8 model of vehicle) being built with components that lead to an 18,000 to 19,500 lb GVWR (most often, 19,500).  Because the 40 CFR 1037.801 and 49 CFR 535.4 classifications go by the GVWR, those vehicles fall into the Class 2b-5 vocational category.  These vehicles are essentially like our more numerous Class 6 to 7 vocational vehicles, except that they fall in the Class 2b-5 category.  If vehicles like these, alone in an averaging category, fail to meet the tire standards, then we will not have any credits to make up for that failure.  This may be a problem, or it may not.
   2.	Similarly, I found a couple dozen Cascadia vehicles (primarily a Class 8 model of vehicle) being built with sleepers and a GVWR of 33,000 lb or less.  By the aforementioned definitions, these would be Class 7.  However, there is no Class 7 sleeper category.  These vehicles have GCWRs > 33,000 lb, which means they are used like Class 8 sleeper vehicles.  Because there is no Class 7 sleeper category, there is definitely a problem here.
   3.	I even found nineteen Class 6 vehicles built with a hole in the back of the cab, likely for installation of a sleeper.  These are possibly configured to be a tractor (although it is hard to tell based upon the data available in our truck specifications). I think I would have to dig into these vehicles' final configurations to understand if they should be treated as tractors or vocational vehicles.

In the first two and perhaps in all three cases, these vehicles would be properly categorized if a manufacturer could petition the agencies to treat the vehicles as being in the next higher class (or two classes up in the case of the Class 6 vehicles if they get sleepers).  Orphaning an ostensibly Class 6 vehicle in Class 5, just because it has GVWR of 19,500 lb instead of 19,501 lb, unnecessarily complicates compliance.  Treating a sleeper-equipped tractor, which is obviously designed for heavy-heavy operation, as Class 7 because it has a GVWR of 33,000 lb exactly, and not 33,001, is problematic because of the lack of a Class 7 sleeper category.  And the third category could be problematic, but I do not understand what these vehicles become when finally configured.  I think that the effect on fuel consumption or emissions would be the same or better if a vehicle were treated as being in higher weight class, and the effect on our certification processes would be to ease our burden.

In short, I recommend that both agencies adopt in 1037.230 and 535.7 this language:  "A vehicle manufacturer may petition the agency to treat a vehicle as if it were in a higher weight class."

Regards,
Dave
-------------------------
David Kayes
Compliance and Regulatory Affairs --- Environmental Compliance
Daimler Trucks
(503) 745-9162 Office
(503) 265-9838 Mobile
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
If you are not the intended addressee, please inform us immediately that you have received this e-mail in error, and delete it. We thank you for your cooperation.


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 35 (Thursday, February 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 12056]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04028]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9783-1]

National Environmental Education Advisory Council

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting(s).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, EPA gives notice of
a series of teleconference meetings of the National Environmental
Education Advisory Council (NEEAC). The NEEAC was created by Congress
to advise, consult with, and make recommendations to the Administrator
of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on matters related to
activities, functions and policies of EPA under the National
Environmental Education Act (the Act).
    The purpose of these teleconference(s) is to discuss specific
topics of relevance for consideration by the council in order to
provide advice and insights to the Agency on environmental education.

DATES: The National Environmental Education Advisory Council will hold
a public teleconference(s) on Wednesday, February 27, 2013, March 27,
2013, May 22, 2013, June 19, 2013 and July 24, 2013, from 12:00 p.m.
until 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Araujo, Designated Federal
Officer<EMAIL_ADDRESS>202-564-2642, U.S. EPA, Office of
Environmental Education, Ariel Rios North Room 1426, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Members of the public wishing to gain access
to the teleconference, make brief oral comments, or provide a written
statement to the NEEAC must contact Javier Araujo, Designated Federal
Officer, at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or<PHONE_NUMBER> by 10 business days
prior to each regularly scheduled meeting.
    Meeting Access: For information on access or services for
individuals with disabilities or to request accommodations please
contact Javier Araujo at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or<PHONE_NUMBER>,
preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much
time as possible to process your request.

Stephanie Owens,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of External Affairs and
Environmental Education.
[FR Doc. 2013-04028 Filed 2-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 93 (Monday, May 14, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28244-28245]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11398]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0014; Airspace Docket No. 12-AEA-1]

Amendment of Class D and E Airspace; Baltimore, MD

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends Class D and E airspace at Martin State
Airport, Baltimore, MD. The geographic coordinates of the Baltimore
VORTAC are being adjusted to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical
database, which show the correct coordinates. This does not affect the
boundaries or operating requirements of the airspace.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, May 14, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O.
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    The FAA is adjusting the geographic location of Baltimore VORTAC,
Baltimore, MD, to be in concert with the FAAs aeronautical database,
which shows the correct coordinates. This is an administrative change
and does not affect the boundaries or operating requirements of the
airspace; therefore, notice and public procedures under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)
are unnecessary.
    The Class D and E airspace designations are published in Paragraphs
5000, 6002 and 6004 of FAA order 7400.9V, dated August 9, 2011, and
effective September 15, 2011, which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR 71.1. The Class D and E airspace designations listed in this
document will be published subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 amends the geographic coordinates in the legal description of
Class D airspace and Class E surface airspace, for Martin State
Airport, Baltimore, MD. This update brings the geographic coordinates
in concert with the FAA's Aeronautical Products database.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends controlled airspace at Martin State Airport, Baltimore,
MD.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9V, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15, 2011, is
amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D airspace.

* * * * *

AEA MD D Baltimore, Martin State Airport, MD [Amended]

Martin State Airport, Baltimore, MD
    (Lat. 39[deg]19'32'' N., long. 76[deg]24'50'' W.)
Baltimore VORTAC
    (Lat. 39[deg]10'16'' N., long. 76[deg]39'41'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
2,500 feet MSL within a 5.2-mile radius of Martin State Airport and
within 4.4 miles each side of a 14.7-mile radius arc of the
Baltimore VORTAC extending clockwise from the Baltimore VORTAC
030[deg] radial to the VORTAC 046[deg] radial, excluding that
airspace within the Washington Tri-Area Class B airspace area and
Restricted Areas R-4001A and R-4001B when they are in effect. This

Class D airspace area is effective during the specific dates and
times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective
date and time will thereafter be continuously published in the
Airport/Facility Directory.

Paragraph 6002 Class E airspace designated as surface areas.

* * * * *

AEA MD E2 Baltimore, Martin State Airport, MD [Amended]

Martin State Airport, MD
    (Lat. 39[deg]19'32'' N., long. 76[deg]24'50'' W.)
Baltimore VORTAC
    (Lat. 39[deg]10'16'' N., long. 76[deg]39'41'' W.)

    Within a 5.2-mile radius of Martin State Airport and within 4.4
miles each side of a 14.7-mile radius arc of the Baltimore VORTAC
extending clockwise from the Baltimore VORTAC 030[deg] radial to the
VORTAC 046[deg] radial, excluding that airspace within the
Washington Tri-Area Class B airspace area and Restricted Areas R-
4001A and R-4001B when they are in effect. This Class E airspace
area is effective during the specific dates and times established in
advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will
thereafter be continuously published in the Airport/Facility
Directory.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on April 30, 2012.
Barry A. Knight,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2012-11398 Filed 5-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 146 (Monday, July 30, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36403-36405]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16140]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 31204; Amdt. No. 3809]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or removes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures (ODPs) for operations at certain
airports. These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption
of new or revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the
National Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective July 30, 2018. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of July 30, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:

For Examination

    1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Ops-M30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, West Bldg., Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    2. The FAA Air Traffic Organization Service Area in which the
affected airport is located;
    3. The office of Aeronautical Navigation Products, 6500 South
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

Availability

    All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available online free
of charge. Visit the National Flight Data Center at nfdc.faa.gov to
register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP
copies may be obtained from the FAA Air Traffic Organization Service
Area in which the affected airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Nichols, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS-420), Flight Technologies and Programs Divisions,
Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box

25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125) Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by establishing,
amending, suspending, or removes SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and/or ODPS.
The complete regulatory description of each SIAP and its associated
Takeoff Minimums or ODP for an identified airport is listed on FAA form
documents which are incorporated by reference in this amendment under 5
U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR part 97.20. The applicable FAA
forms are FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4, 8260-5, 8260-15A, and 8260-15B when
required by an entry on 8260-15A.
    The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, their complex
nature, and the need for a special format make publication in the
Federal Register expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use
the regulatory text of the SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead
refer to their graphic depiction on charts printed by publishers of
aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages of incorporation by
reference are realized and publication of the complete description of
each SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on FAA form documents is
unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR sections and
specifies the types of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs with their
applicable effective dates. This amendment also identifies the airport
and its location, the procedure, and the amendment number.
    Availability and Summary of Material Incorporated by Reference The
material incorporated by reference is publicly available as listed in
the ADDRESSES section.
    The material incorporated by reference describes SIAPS, Takeoff
Minimums and/or ODPS as identified in the amendatory language for part
97 of this final rule.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP as Amended in the
transmittal. Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and textual ODP amendments
may have been issued previously by the FAA in a Flight Data Center
(FDC) Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency action of immediate
flight safety relating directly to published aeronautical charts.
    The circumstances that created the need for some SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP amendments may require making them effective in less
than 30 days. For the remaining SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, an
effective date at least 30 days after publication is provided.
    Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these SIAPs and
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the affected airports. Because of
the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and
public procedure under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are impracticable and contrary
to the public interest and, where applicable, under 5 U.S.C 553(d),
good cause exists for making some SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866;(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,1979) ;
and (3)does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air Traffic Control, Airports, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 13, 2018.
John S. Duncan,
Executive Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) is amended by
establishing, amending, suspending, or removing Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle Departure
Procedures effective at 0901 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113,
40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

Effective 16 August 2018

Moline, IL, Quad City Intl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2
New Iberia, LA, Acadiana Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 1A
St Ignace, MI, Mackinac County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 7, Orig-B
Midland, TX, Midland Airpark, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt
4

Effective 13 September 2018

Iliamna, AK, Iliamna, NDB RWY 36, Amdt 2A
Iliamna, AK, Iliamna, RNAV (GPS) RWY 8, Amdt 4
Iliamna, AK, Iliamna, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Amdt 2
Iliamna, AK, Iliamna, RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Amdt 2
Iliamna, AK, Iliamna, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Amdt 3
Iliamna, AK, Iliamna, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2A
Nondalton, AK, Nondalton, ILIAMNA TWO, Graphic DP
Nondalton, AK, Nondalton, RNAV (GPS) RWY 2, Amdt 1
Sand Point, AK, Sand Point, BORLAND TWO, Graphic DP
Sand Point, AK, Sand Point, NDB RWY 14, Amdt 2
Sand Point, AK, Sand Point, NDB RWY 32, Amdt 1
Sand Point, AK, Sand Point, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Amdt 1
Sand Point, AK, Sand Point, RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig
Sand Point, AK, Sand Point, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt
4A
St George, AK, St George, ILS OR LOC RWY 11, Amdt 1
St George, AK, St George, LOC/DME-C, Orig-A, CANCELED
St George, AK, St George, RNAV (GPS) RWY 11, Orig
St George, AK, St George, RNAV (GPS)-B, Orig-A, CANCELED
St George, AK, St George, RNAV (GPS)-D, Amdt 1
Long Beach, CA, Long Beach/Daugherty Field/, RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 30,
Amdt 3A
Sacramento, CA, Sacramento Mather, ILS OR LOC RWY 22L, Amdt 6
Sacramento, CA, Sacramento Mather, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4R, Amdt 1C
Sacramento, CA, Sacramento Mather, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22L, Amdt 3
Denver, CO, Front Range, ILS OR LOC RWY 17, Amdt 1B
Denver, CO, Front Range, ILS OR LOC RWY 26, Amdt 6
Denver, CO, Front Range, ILS OR LOC RWY 35, Amdt 2
Denver, CO, Front Range, NDB RWY 26, Amdt 5A, CANCELED
Denver, CO, Front Range, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 1B
Denver, CO, Front Range, RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Amdt 2
Denver, CO, Front Range, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Amdt 2

Dunnellon, FL, Marion County, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt
1A
Charles City, IA, Northeast Iowa Rgnl, LOC RWY 12, Amdt 1A
Chicago/Aurora, IL, Aurora Muni, ILS OR LOC RWY 9, Amdt 4
Chicago/Aurora, IL, Aurora Muni, LOC RWY 33, Amdt 1
Chicago/Aurora, IL, Aurora Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Amdt 2
Chicago/Aurora, IL, Aurora Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 15, Amdt 1
Chicago/Aurora, IL, Aurora Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, Amdt 1A
Chicago, IL, Chicago Midway Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 13C, Amdt 1
Chicago, IL, Chicago Midway Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY4L, Amdt 1
Chicago, IL, Chicago Midway Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22R, Amdt 1
Chicago, IL, Chicago Midway Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 31R, Amdt 1
Chicago, IL, Chicago Midway Intl, RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 13C, Amdt 1
Lewisport, KY, Hancock Co-Ron Lewis Field, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Orig-A Picayune, MS, Picayune Muni, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY
18, Orig-A
Mansfield, OH, Mansfield Lahm Rgnl, NDB RWY 32, Amdt 11E
Mansfield, OH, Mansfield Lahm Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Amdt 1A
Mansfield, OH, Mansfield Lahm Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Amdt 1A
Fairview, OK, Fairview Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 1
Gallatin, TN, Sumner County Rgnl, VOR-A, Amdt 3
Millington, TN, Millington-Memphis, ILS OR LOC RWY 22, Amdt 5
Millington, TN, Millington-Memphis, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Amdt 1B
Millington, TN, Millington-Memphis, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Amdt 2
Millington, TN, Millington-Memphis, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Orig-B
Millington, TN, Millington-Memphis, VOR OR TACAN RWY 22, Amdt 3
Rogersville, TN, Hawkins County, NDB RWY 7, Amdt 3
Rogersville, TN, Hawkins County, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 3
Killeen, TX, Skylark Field, LOC RWY 1, Orig-A
Yakima, WA, Yakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field, RNAV (GPS) W RWY
27, Amdt 1B, CANCELED
Yakima, WA, Yakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field, RNAV (GPS) X RWY
27, Amdt 1E
Milwaukee, WI, General Mitchell Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 1L, ILS RWY 1L
(CAT II), ILS RWY 1L (CAT III), Amdt 10
Milwaukee, WI, General Mitchell Intl, ILS OR LOC 7R, Amdt 16C
Milwaukee, WI, General Mitchell Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 19R, Amdt 13
Milwaukee, WI, General Mitchell Intl, LOC RWY 25L, Amdt 6
Milwaukee, WI, General Mitchell Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 1L, Amdt 2
Milwaukee, WI, General Mitchell Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 1R, Amdt 1
Milwaukee, WI, General Mitchell Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 7L, Amdt 1
Milwaukee, WI, General Mitchell Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 1
Milwaukee, WI, General Mitchell Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 19L, Amdt 1
Milwaukee, WI, General Mitchell Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 25R, Amdt 1
Milwaukee, WI, General Mitchell Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Amdt 1
Milwaukee, WI, General Mitchell Intl, RNAV (RNP) Y RWY 7R, Orig-B
Milwaukee, WI, General Mitchell Intl, RNAV (RNP) Y RWY 25L, Orig-B
Morgantown, WV, Morgantown Muni-Walter L Bill Hart Fld, VOR-A, Amdt
13, CANCELED

[FR Doc. 2018-16140 Filed 7-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: June 6, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 110)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 32250-32252]
[DOCID:fr06jn08-14]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0613; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-066-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300-600 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    One operator experienced failures of four Fuel Level Sensor-
Amplifier (FLSA) and Multi Tank Indicators (MTI) units. FLSA and MTI
failures have been identified as having been caused by incorrect
connector sleeves material fitted to the MTI units.
    Degradation of the electrical insulation sleeves of the Low-
level indication lamps on the MTI on the flight deck can cause a
short circuit that might result in high voltage being conveyed to
the high- and low-level sensors in the outer tanks. This might cause
the level sensor to heat above acceptable limits.
* * * * *

This action is necessary to prevent overheating of the fuel level
sensors, which could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent
loss of the airplane. The proposed AD would require actions that are
intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 7, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1138; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0613;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-066-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued
Airworthiness Directive 2008-0055, dated March 5, 2008 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    One operator experienced failures of four Fuel Level Sensor-
Amplifier (FLSA) and Multi Tank Indicators (MTI) units. FLSA and MTI
failures have been identified as having been caused by incorrect
connector sleeves material fitted to the MTI units.
    Degradation of the electrical insulation sleeves of the Low-
level indication lamps on the MTI on the flight deck can cause a
short circuit that might result in high voltage being conveyed to
the high- and low-level sensors in the outer tanks. This might cause
the level sensor to heat above acceptable limits.
    For the reasons stated above, this Airworthiness Directive (AD)
requires the accomplishment of wiring modifications to protect the
FLSA and the Flight Warning Computers from 115V AC and 28V DC short
circuits within the MTI.
This action is necessary to prevent overheating of the fuel level
sensors, which could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent
loss of the airplane. You may obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A300-28A6096, Revision 01, dated
April 16, 2008. The actions described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 151 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 5 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $0 per product. Where the
service information lists required parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these costs.
As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some
parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $60,400, or $400 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2008-0613; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-
066-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by July 7, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all Airbus Model A300-600 airplanes,
certificated in any category; all certified models, all serial
numbers.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    One operator experienced failures of four Fuel Level Sensor-
Amplifier (FLSA) and Multi Tank Indicators (MTI) units. FLSA and MTI
failures have been identified as having been caused by incorrect
connector sleeves material fitted to the MTI units.
    Degradation of the electrical insulation sleeves of the Low-
level indication lamps on the MTI on the flight deck can cause a
short circuit that might result in high voltage being conveyed to
the high and low level sensors in the outer tanks. This might cause
the level sensor to heat above acceptable limits.
    For the reasons stated above, this Airworthiness Directive (AD)
requires the accomplishment of wiring modifications to protect the
FLSA and the Flight Warning Computers from 115V AC and 28V DC short
circuits within the MTI.

This action is necessary to prevent overheating of the fuel level
sensors, which could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent
loss of the airplane.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD, unless
already done: Modify the wiring in the right-hand electronics rack
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A300-28A6096, Revision 01, dated April 16, 2008. Previous
accomplishment of the modification before the effective date of this
AD in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28A6096, dated
October 19, 2007, meets the requirements in this paragraph.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (425)
227-1149. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which
the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI)
in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI,
your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2008-0055, dated March 5, 2008, and Airbus Service
Bulletin A300-28A6096, Revision 01, dated April 16, 2008, for
related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 29, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-12727 Filed 6-5-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 204 (Monday, October 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53324-53326]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22905]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-84434; File No. SR-NYSE-2018-48]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change of
Non-Substantive Amendments to Rules 1.1, 7.31, and 7.46

October 16, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on October 3, 2018, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes non-substantive amendments to Rules 1.1,
7.31, and 7.46. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to reorganize the terms defined in Rule 1.1,
Definitions, to place them in alphabetical order. The Exchange does not
propose to amend the definition of any term that is currently defined
in Rule 1.1. The Exchange also proposes to adopt a definition of the
term ``Exchange Act'' under Rule 1.1(h), which would be defined as
``the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.'' This definition is
identical

to the same definition in the rules of the Exchange's affiliate, NYSE
Arca.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(q).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to amend Rules 7.31 and 7.46 to re-name
``Limit Non-Routable Order'' as ``Non-Routable Limit Order'' and
``Limit Non-Displayed Order'' as ``Non-Displayed Limit Order.'' These
proposed rule changes are based on the terms used by the Exchange's
affiliates, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'') and NYSE Arca, for
the same order types.\5\ In both cases, the Exchange believes that it
promotes clarity and consistency in its rules to move the respective
modifier for each of these rules before the term ``Limit Order.'' The
Exchange does not propose to amend the operation of either order type.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See NYSE American Rules 7.31E(d)(2), 7.31E(e)(1)(E),
7.46E(f)(5)(E), and 7.46-E(f)(5)(F). See also NYSE Arca Rule 7.31-
E(d)(2), 7.31-E(e)(1), 7.46-E(f)(5)(E), and 7.46-E(f)(5)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\6\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\7\ in particular, because
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that alphabetizing the defined terms under
Rule 1.1 would remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a
free and open market and a national market system because it add
clarity to the Exchange's rules and make the defined terms easier to
navigate. The Exchange does not propose to amend the definition of any
term that is currently defined in Rule 1.1. In addition, the proposed
definition of the term ``Exchange Act'' under Rule 1.1(h), is identical
to the same definition in the rules of the Exchange's affiliate, NYSE
Arca.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(q).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes that renaming ``Limit Non-Displayed
Order'' as ``Non-Displayed Limit Order'' and ``Limit Non-Routable
Order'' as ``Non-Routable Limit Order'' would remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system because the proposed changes are designed to promote clarity and
consistency in Exchange rules by moving the modifier describing the
function of the order type before the term ``Limit Order.'' The
Exchange does not propose any changes to the operation of either order
type. These proposed rule changes are also based on the terms used by
the Exchange's affiliates, NYSE American and NYSE Arca, for the same
order types,\9\ and would, therefore, remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market
system by ensuring consistent terms are use amongst the Exchange and
its affiliates for the same order types.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See NYSE American Rules 7.31E(d)(2), 7.31E(e)(1)(E),
7.46E(f)(5)(E), and 7.46-E(f)(5)(F). See also NYSE Arca Rule 7.31-
E(d)(2), 7.31-E(e)(1), 7.46-E(f)(5)(E), and 7.46-E(f)(5)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change
will not have any impact on competition because it simply alphabetize
definitions and renames two order types and does not make any changes
to the operation of those order types or to alter any existing
definition. In addition, the proposed definition of ``Exchange Act''
will not have a competitive impact because the new definition is
intended to simply add clarity to the Exchange's rules and is identical
to the same definition in the rules of the Exchange's affiliate, NYSE
Arca.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(q).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\
Because the foregoing proposed rule does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, provided that the self-regulatory organization
has given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or such shorter time as designated
by the Commission,\13\ the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \14\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \13\ The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \16\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2018-48 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2018-48. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent

amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do
not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSE-2018-48 and should be submitted on or before November 13, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-22905 Filed 10-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 30, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59635-59636]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20764]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2016-N-0001]

FDA Small Business and Industry Assistance Regulatory Education
for Industry Fall Conference

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of conference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (CDER) and the Center for Devices and
Radiological Health (CDRH) are sponsoring a 2 day conference entitled
``FDA Small Business and Industry Assistance Regulatory Education for
Industry (REdI) Fall Conference.'' The goal of this conference is to
provide direct, relevant, and helpful information on the key aspects of
drug and device regulations. Our primary audience is that of small
manufacturers of drug and/or device medical products who want to learn
about how FDA approaches the regulation of drugs and devices. However,
anyone involved in the pharmaceutical and/device industry may attend.

DATES: The public conference will be held on September 27 and 28, 2016,
from 8:15 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for registration information.

ADDRESSES: The public conference will be held at the Sheraton Silver
Spring Hotel, 8777 Georgia Ave., Cypress and Magnolia Ballrooms (4th
floor), Silver Spring, MD 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Stodart, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Elias Mallis, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing a public conference entitled ``FDA Small Business
and Industry Assistance Regulatory Education for Industry (REdI) Fall
Conference.'' This conference is intended to increase the drug and
device industry's awareness of applicable FDA regulations. There will
be an opportunity for questions and answers following each
presentation.

II. Topics for Discussion at the Conference

     CDER: Manufacturing Process Validation; Interactions with
FDA; Emerging Technology and Inspection for New Drug Applications and
Biologic License Applications.
     CDRH: 510(k); De Novo; Design Controls; and Complaints.
    Registration: There is no fee to attend the public conference.
Space is limited, and registration will be on a first-come, first-
served basis. To register, please complete registration at: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/SmallBusinessAssistance/ucm514324.htm.
    If you need special accommodations due to disability, please
contact<EMAIL_ADDRESS>at least 7 days in advance.
    Streaming Webcast of the Conference: This public conference will
also be Webcast. Persons interested in viewing the Webcast must
register to receive a confirmation email with the Webcast link.
    Transcripts: Transcripts will not be available.

    Dated: August 23, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-20764 Filed 8-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 218 (Thursday, November 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 69961]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28639]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER16-182-000]

Cameron Ridge II, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding
Cameron Ridge II, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is November 24, 2015.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 4, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-28639 Filed 11-10-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


"Matz, Tim"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>03/06/2007 02:32 PM	To
Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
cc
"McKervey, Gerry"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>"O'Hare, Andy"
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>bcc

Subject
RE: Letter on conformation of Portland Cement Mercury testing

		Dear Mr. Barnett,

This response is to confirm that Lehigh Cement Company agrees to perform
mercury testing at its Mason City, Iowa facility. Lehigh will conduct
such testing according to an EPA approved testing protocol which is
currently being developed. Lehigh will provide EPA with the data results
and testing report as soon as practical but contingent upon an EPA
approved testing protocol and the availability of a stack testing firm.

Best Regards,

Timothy L. Matz
Corporate Environmental Manager
Heidelberg Technology Center
7660 Imperial Way
Allentown, Pa. 18195
Tel.<PHONE_NUMBER>
Fax.<PHONE_NUMBER>
Cell<PHONE_NUMBER>
e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
-----Original Message-----
From<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 11:23 AM
To<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Matz, Tim<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Andrew O'Hare
Cc<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: Letter on conformation of Portland Cement Mercury testing

To all:

I have spoken with most if you concerning conformation of mercury
testing, and I understand there is another conference call today.  And I
realize you are still working on test methods.  However, as I explained
on the phone we need to be able to make a showing to the court that this
project is moving forward.  As a result, I need written confirmation
that you have agreed to test (unless you have already sent it), and at
least your best guess on a schedule (and any caveats you need to
include).  My Office of General Counsel has told me that I will still
need to send a confirming letter, so that we (EPA) is on record in this
matter.  So when you see the letter show up, this is a procedural issue.
The letter will simply confirm our understanding and will request a
response only  if anything we state is incorrect.

As I also mentioned, please don't hold this up waiting on a final
decision on the test method.  That item can wait.

Keith W. Barnett
USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG
Mail Code D243-02
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711
919-541-5605
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>