[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 152 (Monday, August 8, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48093-48101]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19900]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 370

[EPA-HQ-SFUND-2010-0763; FRL-9448-8]
RIN 2050-AG64

Hazardous Chemical Reporting: Revisions to the Emergency and
Hazardous Chemical Inventory Forms (Tier I and Tier II)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) is
proposing to revise the Emergency and Hazardous Chemical Inventory
Forms (Tier I and Tier II) under Section 312 of the Emergency Planning
and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) to add new data elements and
revise some existing data elements.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 7, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-2010-0763 by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: EPA Docket Center, Superfund Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. In addition, please mail a copy of your comments
on the information collection provisions to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Attn:
Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th St., NW., Washington, DC 20503.
     Hand Delivery: Environmental Protection Agency West
Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20004. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal
hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
2010-0763. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Superfund Docket,
EPA/DC, EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone
number for the Superfund Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sicy Jacob, Office of Emergency
Management, Mailcode 5104A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington DC 20004; telephone number: (202)
564-8019; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>You may also contact the Superfund, TRI, EPCRA, RMP
and Oil Information Center at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER> (in the
Washington, DC, metropolitan area). You may wish to visit the Office of
Emergency Management (OEM) Internet site at http://www.epa.gov/emergencies.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Here are the contents of today's preamble.

I. General Information
    A. Who is affected by this proposed rule?
    B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
    C. What is the statutory authority for this proposed rule?
    D. What is the background of this proposed rule?
II. What are the revisions that EPA is proposing on the Tier I and
Tier II forms?
    A. Facility Identification
    B. Name of the Facility's Parent Company and Owner or Operator
of the Facility
    C. Facility Emergency Coordinator

    D. Tier I and Tier II Information Contacts
    E. Subject to Emergency Planning Notification Under Section 302
of EPCRA
    F. Subject to Chemical Accident Prevention Under Section 112(r)
of the Clean Air Act (40 CFR part 68, Risk Management Program)
    G. Range Codes and Ranges for Reporting Maximum Amount and
Average Daily Amount
III. What are the revisions specific to the Tier II form proposed by
EPA in this rule?
    A. Chemical Information
    B. Storage Types and Conditions
IV. Statutory and Executive Orders
    A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
    B. Paperwork Reduction Act
    C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
    E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
    F. Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments)
    G. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks)
    H. Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
    I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (``NTAA'')
    J. Executive Order 12898: (Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations)

 I. General Information

A. Who is affected by this proposed rule?

    Entities that would be affected by this proposed rule are those
organizations and facilities subject to Section 312 of the Emergency
Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) and its implementing
regulations found in 40 CFR part 370. If you have questions regarding
the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the
person listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments remember
to:
     Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and
page number).
     Follow directions--The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
     Explain why you agree or disagree, suggest alternatives,
and substitute language for your requested changes.
     Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used.
     If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
     Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
     Explain your views as clearly as possible.
     Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

C. What is the statutory authority for this proposed rule?

    This proposed rule is being issued under EPCRA, which was enacted
as Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA)
of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-499). The Agency relies on sections 312 and 328 of
EPCRA for general rulemaking authority.

D. What is the background of this proposed rule?

    Title III of SARA (EPCRA) establishes authorities for emergency
planning and preparedness, emergency release notification reporting,
community right-to-know reporting, and toxic chemical release
reporting. It is intended to encourage State and local planning and
preparedness for releases of extremely hazardous substances (EHSs) and
to provide the public, local governments, fire departments and other
emergency officials with information concerning chemical releases and
the potential chemical risks in their communities. EPCRA consists of
emergency planning notification and community right-to-know reporting
of hazardous and toxic chemicals. The implementing regulations as well
as substances and reporting thresholds are codified in 40 CFR parts 355
and 370.
    Under the emergency planning provisions of EPCRA, codified in 40
CFR part 355, a facility is required to provide a one-time notification
to the State Emergency Response Commission (SERC) and the local
emergency planning committee (LEPC) if the facility has any EHS present
at the site in excess of its threshold planning quantity (TPQ). EHSs
and their TPQs are listed in 40 CFR part 355, Appendix A and B. The
emergency planning notification occurred approximately seven months
after the law was passed for facilities that existed at that time. Any
facilities that became subject to the notification requirement after
that date are required to comply as provided in 40 CFR part 355.
Facilities that are currently covered by these regulations are required
to report only changes occurring at the facility that may be relevant
to emergency planning. LEPCs use the information obtained from
facilities to develop emergency response plans required under section
303 of EPCRA. Section 303 of EPCRA also requires LEPCs to review these
plans annually and to adjust them accordingly, for changes that have
occurred in their community.
    Reporting requirements under the community right-to-know
provisions, sections 311 and 312 of EPCRA are on-going obligations.
Sections 311 and 312 of EPCRA apply to owners and operators of
facilities that are required to prepare or have available a material
safety data sheet (MSDS) for a hazardous chemical defined under the
Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard
(HCS). If the hazardous chemical is present at or above the reporting
thresholds specified in 40 CFR part 370, the facility owner or operator
is required to submit a MSDS or a list that contains the hazardous
chemical under section 311 of EPCRA. Under section 312 of EPCRA, if a
hazardous chemical is present at or above the reporting threshold
specified in 40 CFR part 370, the facility owner or operator is
required to submit an emergency and hazardous chemical inventory form
(Tier I or Tier II) to the SERC, LEPC and the local fire department
annually by March 1.
    As required by section 312(g) of EPCRA, EPA published two emergency
and hazardous chemical inventory reporting forms, Tier I and Tier II.
The Tier I inventory form requires facilities to report minimum
information on the general types and locations of hazardous chemicals
present at the facility. The Tier II inventory form requires facilities
to report specific information on the amounts and locations of
hazardous chemicals present at the facility. The information required
under Tier I and Tier II can be found in Sec. Sec.  370.41 and 370.42
of the regulations.
    Section 312(a)(2) of EPCRA states that the owner or operator of a
facility shall submit the Tier I inventory form annually by March 1 to
the SERC, LEPC and the local fire department. However, section 312(e)
states that the owner or operator of a facility shall submit the Tier
II inventory form upon request by their SERC, LEPC or the fire
department with jurisdiction over the facility. Currently, all states
require facilities to submit the federal Tier II inventory form or the
state developed inventory reporting form.
    In addition to the information obtained under the emergency
planning

provisions of EPCRA, LEPCs use the information provided on the
facility's annual emergency and hazardous chemical inventory form to
update the emergency response plan for their communities. States were
always given the flexibility to implement the EPCRA program as
appropriate for their State to meet the goals of EPCRA, which is to
prepare for and respond to releases of EHSs and to provide the public
with information on potential chemical risks in their communities. This
flexibility includes adding more chemicals, setting lower reporting
thresholds and creating a reporting form or format that includes more
information than is required by the federal reporting requirements.
Some States developed their own inventory reporting form, including
electronic reporting format. Other States use the federal inventory
reporting form or the federal electronic reporting format, Tier2
Submit.
    Over the years, stakeholders requested that EPA add new data
elements to the forms that would be useful to improve their community
emergency response plans. In this action, EPA is proposing new data
elements to make the forms more useful for State and local agencies and
to better inform the public on chemical hazards in their communities.
We are also proposing to revise some existing data elements to make
reporting easier for facilities. The elements proposed herein are
intended to meet the purpose of EPCRA (Title III of SARA) which is ``*
* * to encourage and support State and local planning for emergencies
caused by the release of hazardous chemicals and to provide citizens
and governments with information concerning potential chemical hazards
present in their communities.'' See 55 FR 30632, Community Right-to-
Know Reporting Requirements, Final Rule, July 26, 1990.

II. What are the revisions that EPA is proposing on the Tier I and Tier
II forms?

    The Tier I and Tier II forms were first published in 1987 and were
amended in 1990. Recently, State and local agencies requested that EPA
modify these forms to include new data elements and revise existing
data elements to make it more useful for emergency planning and
response. EPA requests public comment on each of the new and revised
data elements proposed by EPA in this notice for the Tier I and Tier II
forms. These elements are described below.
    Information requirements for the Tier I and Tier II forms can be
found in 40 CFR 370.41 and 370.42, respectively. Current Tier I and II
forms are available on the Agency's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/emergencies. Additionally, the current Tier I and Tier II inventory
forms and the proposed Tier I and II inventory forms with the
additional elements and changes highlighted are in the docket for
today's rulemaking under the docket number EPA-HQ-SFUND-2010-0763.

A. Facility Identification

    In addition to the information currently required on the Tier I and
Tier II forms under facility identification, we are proposing to add
new data elements for facility phone number, latitude and longitude,
and number of full-time employees.
    Section 312 covers a broad range of chemicals and facilities. Some
of the facilities covered under section 312 also may be subject to the
Chemical Accident Prevention under section 112 (r) of the Clean Air Act
(CAA), also known as the Risk Management Program or the Toxic Release
Inventory (TRI) Program under section 313 of EPCRA. For those
facilities that are subject to these programs, EPA is also proposing to
add data elements for facility identification numbers that are assigned
under these two programs. These data elements should be readily
available to facilities that are covered by these two programs.
Stakeholders have requested that EPA add these data elements in order
to provide more complete information on the facilities to the public
and to the State and local agencies responsible for emergency planning
and response.
    In addition to reporting the number of full-time employees, local
emergency responders requested that EPA require facilities such as
hotels, colleges, universities, and convention centers to report the
total number of people that may occupy a building at any given time, to
assist them in emergency planning and response. While EPA is not
including this additional element in today's proposal, EPA requests
comments if number of occupants should also be added as a data element
to the Tier I and II inventory forms.

B. Name of the Facility's Parent Company and Owner or Operator of the
Facility

    States and LEPCs informed EPA that some facilities have sites in
remote locations and do not have operators present at all times. Thus,
if there is a need to contact someone in an emergency, emergency
response officials and State and local agencies need the contact
information of the facility's parent company or the owner or operator
of the facility. Therefore, under the facility identification section,
EPA is also proposing to require facilities to provide information on
the facility's parent company and the owner or operator of the
facility, such as name, address and phone number, as well as the Dun
and Bradstreet number of the facility's parent company. EPA is also
proposing that the facility owner or operator provide their e-mail
address.

C. Facility Emergency Coordinator

    Under EPCRA section 303(d)(1), a facility is required to provide
the LEPC with the name and contact information of a facility
representative who will participate in the emergency planning process
as a facility emergency coordinator. The regulations in Sec.  355.20
(c) require facilities to notify LEPCs of any changes relevant to the
emergency planning within 30 days after the changes have occurred.
However, EPA also believes that this information should be provided on
the facility's annual inventory form since LEPCs and other emergency
response coordinators may need this information during an emergency.
Therefore, EPA is proposing to add this data element to the Tier I and
Tier II forms.

D. Tier I and Tier II Information Contacts

    Since the information reported under EPCRA section 312 is used by
LEPCs to improve emergency response plans, these entities may need to
contact the facility regarding information that is reported on the Tier
I and Tier II reporting forms. The information filed under section 312
is also used by emergency response officials during an emergency
situation. As requested by these entities, the Agency is proposing to
require the name, title, phone number and e-mail address of the person
knowledgeable or responsible for completing the information on the Tier
I and Tier II forms.

E. Subject to Emergency Planning Under Section 302 of EPCRA

    EPCRA section 302(c) requires facilities to notify their SERC and
LEPC that they are subject to emergency planning if there is an EHS
present at the facility at or above its threshold planning quantity
(TPQ). For facilities in existence when EPCRA was enacted, this was a
one-time notification that occurred approximately seven months after
enactment (in May 1987). Facilities that became subject to the
emergency planning notification requirement after this date are
required to provide notification to their SERC and LEPC within sixty
days of becoming subject to the requirements.

    EPCRA section 303(a) requires each LEPC to develop an emergency
response plan for their communities. Such plans were to be developed in
two years after the enactment of EPCRA (October 1988). EPCRA section
303(a) also requires LEPCs to review the emergency response plan once a
year. LEPCs use the information reported by facilities under section
302(c) to develop or update the emergency response plans in their
community. The Agency believes that some of the facilities which
complied with the requirements under section 302(c) may no longer be
subject to emergency planning, for a number of reasons, including using
a chemical that is safer than an EHS, having an EHS below the TPQ, etc.
The Agency also believes that facilities that may become subject to the
annual inventory reporting under EPCRA section 312 may not be aware of
the requirements under EPCRA section 302. The EPCRA section 312
reporting requirement covers a broad range of chemicals, including EHSs
that are subject to emergency planning.
    The reporting thresholds and requirements for EHSs are different
under sections 302 and 312. The reporting requirement for EHSs under
section 302 is to provide notification to the SERC and LEPC if the
facility has any EHS at or above the TPQ in order to complete emergency
planning requirements for the community. The reporting requirement for
EHSs under section 312 is to submit an inventory form annually by March
1 to the SERC, LEPC and the local fire department if the EHS is present
at a facility at any one time in an amount equal to or greater than 500
pounds or the TPQ, whichever is less in order to inform the public of
chemical hazards in their community.
    Since the notification under section 302(c) is a one-time
notification which occurred in 1987 for most facilities, and since
section 303(a) requires LEPCs to update the emergency plan annually, it
would be useful for LEPCs to get an update from facilities clarifying
whether they are still subject to emergency planning. This will help
ensure that local emergency plans are up-to-date and include all
appropriate facilities.
    To better account for facilities subject to emergency planning and
for LEPCs to use this information to improve the emergency response
plans in their community, LEPCs requested that EPA require facilities
to report if they are subject to emergency planning notification under
EPCRA section 302. As a result, the Agency is proposing to add a new
data element to indicate if facilities are subject to the emergency
planning notification under EPCRA section 302.

F. Subject to Chemical Accident Prevention Under Section 112(r) of the
Clean Air Act (40 CFR Part 68, Risk Management Program)

    Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) amendments of 1990
requires certain facilities to develop and implement a risk management
program to prevent accidental releases of regulated chemicals.
Facilities subject to section 112(r) of the CAA are required to
implement an accident prevention program and an emergency response
program, conduct hazard assessment and summarize and submit to EPA
information about these programs and hazards in a risk management plan
(RMP). The implementing regulations are codified in 40 CFR part 68,
Chemical Accident Prevention, also known as the Risk Management
Program.
    In addition to the information reported under EPCRA section 312,
LEPCs and States use the information reported in RMPs to improve the
emergency response plans in each community. In order to better serve
this purpose, EPA is proposing to add a new data element to both the
Tier I and Tier II forms to indicate whether the facility is subject to
chemical accident prevention under section 112(r) of the CAA.

G. Range Codes and Ranges for Reporting Maximum Amount and Average
Daily Amount

    As stated in EPCRA section 312(d), the information requirements in
40 CFR 370.41 and 370.42 for the Tier I and Tier II forms currently
list range codes for reporting the maximum amount and average daily
amounts of hazardous chemicals present at the site in the preceding
calendar year. The range codes currently listed in the regulations are
very broad. Such information is not as useful as specific quantity
information for effective emergency response planning. Since the
statute specifically states that an estimate in ranges for the maximum
amount and average daily amount should be reported on the Tier I and II
inventory forms, the regulations would still require facilities to
report in ranges. However, in order for the States, local agencies and
emergency response officials to have information on the maximum amount
and average daily amount that are closer to the actual amounts present
at the facility, EPA is proposing to narrow the ranges that are in the
existing regulations. EPA specifically seeks comments if the range
codes and the ranges proposed below would be more useful to LEPCs for
effective emergency response planning or for responding to emergencies,
and if not, what ranges would be more useful to the LEPCs for effective
emergency response planning or for responding to emergencies.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Weight range in pounds
       Range codes        ----------------------------------------------
                               From                    To
------------------------------------------------------------------------
01.......................            0  99.
02.......................          100  499.
03.......................          500  999.
04.......................        1,000  4,999.
05.......................        5,000  9,999.
06.......................       10,000  24,999.
07.......................       25,000  49,999.
08.......................       50,000  74,999.
09.......................       75,000  99,999.
10.......................      100,000  499,999.
11.......................      500,000  999,999.
12.......................    1,000,000  9,999,999.
13.......................   10,000,000  Greater than 10
                                        million.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. What are the revisions specific to the Tier II form proposed by
EPA in this rule?

    Facilities are required to report specific information about
hazardous chemicals on the Tier II inventory form. Some states may
require additional information than that which is required under the
federal reporting requirements. In addition to the new data elements
proposed in the previous section of this document, EPA is proposing to
revise some existing data elements on the Tier II federal inventory
form.

A. Chemical Information

    In the final rule published on November 3, 2008 (73 FR 65452), EPA
clarified how to report a hazardous chemical mixture after determining
if the mixture or its hazardous components meet or exceed the reporting
thresholds specified in 40 CFR part 370. In that notice, the Agency
clarified that if a hazardous chemical in the mixture is an EHS, the
facility has to aggregate any and all amounts of that EHS present
throughout the facility in mixtures and in pure form to determine if
the reporting threshold for EHS has been met or exceeded. If the
reporting threshold for that EHS is exceeded, then the facility would
have an option to report the mixture or the EHS component.
    To determine if the reporting threshold has been met or exceeded
for a mixture that contains a non-EHS hazardous chemical component, a
facility has the option to either add up

all the amounts of that non-EHS hazardous chemical present as a
component in all mixtures and all other quantities of that non-EHS
hazardous chemical present throughout the facility or consider the
total quantity of that mixture present throughout the facility. Once it
is determined that the reporting threshold is met or exceeded for
either the non-EHS hazardous chemical component or the mixture, the
facility has the option to report the non-EHS hazardous chemical
component or the mixture itself. See Sec.  370.14 for requirements on
reporting mixtures. As stated in Sec.  370.14(b), EPA encourages
facilities to be consistent with their reporting under EPCRA section
311 when reporting mixtures.
    In this notice, EPA is proposing to modify the chemical information
reporting section of the Tier II inventory form to make it more user-
friendly for States and local agencies, as well as the emergency
response officials. This revision will also benefit facilities by
clarifying how to report mixtures on the Tier II form. Specifically,
the current form requires facilities to report the name of the mixture,
indicate whether the mixture contains an EHS, indicate the physical and
health hazards of the mixture, and report the amount present on-site,
as well as the type of storage and storage locations. The regulated
community and the state and local agencies, however, are unsure if the
amount present on-site refers to the mixture or the non-EHS hazardous
chemical or the EHS in the mixture. In order to clarify the reporting
of pure chemicals vs. mixtures, the proposed Tier II form has separate
entries for mixtures and pure chemicals. The entry for mixtures
includes a separate line for mixture name, amount of mixture present
(i.e. maximum and average daily amount), the EHS(s) name, and the
amount of EHS(s) present (i.e. maximum and average daily amount).
Facilities still have the option to report the mixture or the hazardous
chemical component as stated in Sec.  370.14.

B. Storage Types and Conditions

    The Tier II form currently requires facilities to report the codes
for types of storage (i.e. above ground tank, steel drum) and storage
conditions (i.e. temperature, pressure). A code is currently listed for
each type of storage and storage conditions in Sec.  370.43. In order
to make the form more user-friendly and also to have information
readily available to emergency response officials in an emergency, EPA
proposes that facilities list the types of storage (i.e. above ground
tank, steel drum) and storage conditions (i.e. ambient temperature,
ambient pressure) on the Tier II form rather than noting the reporting
codes.
    EPA seeks public comment on all the proposed new data elements and
revisions of the existing data elements described in this proposed
rule. The Agency also requests that commenters, including State and
local agencies suggest any additional information that should be added
to the Tier I and Tier II forms in order to make them more useful for
emergency planning and response.
    Finally, we would note that the Agency is not proposing to revise
the introductory paragraph to Sec. Sec.  370.41 and 370.42. However,
since we are proposing to add some new data elements and proposing to
revise some existing data elements, we re-arranged and re-numbered all
the paragraphs to be consistent with how each data element appears on
the Tier I and Tier II inventory forms.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is
therefore not subject to review under the Executive Orders 12866 and
13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011). We believe this action is
administrative and non-controversial. The proposed data elements are
readily available to the facility. Stakeholders requested that EPA add
these new data elements because the additional information would
improve community emergency response planning. In addition, revising
the existing data elements will make the forms more user-friendly.
    The proposed regulation will not have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way
the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs,
the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The information collection requirements in this proposed rule have
been submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. The
Information Collection Request (ICR) document prepared by EPA has been
assigned EPA ICR number 1352.13. This action may impose only minimal
reporting burden on facilities since the data elements proposed are
readily available to the facility. Revising the existing data elements
will make the forms more user-friendly and ease reporting requirements
for facilities. Stakeholders requested that EPA add the new data
elements since the additional information would be useful to develop or
modify their community emergency response plans. New data elements,
such as facility emergency coordinator needs to be updated annually for
LEPCs to coordinate the emergency plans and response to emergencies in
their community.
    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has previously approved
the information collection requirements contained in regulations at 40
CFR part 370 which includes information requirements for the Tier I and
Tier II inventory forms, under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and has assigned OMB control
number 2050-0072, EPA ICR number 1352.11. The OMB control numbers for
EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9. Burden is defined at 5
CFR 1320.3(b). An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers
for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
    To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy
of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for
minimizing respondent burden, EPA has established a public docket for
this rule, which includes this ICR, under Docket ID number EPA-HQ-
SFUND-2010-0763. Submit any comments related to the ICR to EPA and OMB.
See ADDRESSES section at the beginning of this notice for where to
submit comments to EPA. Send comments to OMB at the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget,
725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Office for
EPA. Since OMB is required to make a decision concerning the ICR
between 30 and 60 days after August 8, 2011, a comment to OMB is best
assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it by September 7,
2011. The final rule will respond to any OMB or public comments on the
information collection requirements contained in this proposal.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment

rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses, small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
    For purposes of assessing the impacts of today's proposed rule on
small entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business as
defined by the Small Business Administration's (SBA) regulations at 13
CFR 121.201; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government
of a city, county, town, school district or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is
any ``not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and
operated and is not dominant in its field.''
    After considering the economic impacts of today's proposed rule on
small entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. In
determining whether a rule has a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, the impact of concern is any
significant adverse economic impact on small entities, since the
primary purpose of the regulatory flexibility analyses is to identify
and address regulatory alternatives ``which minimize any significant
economic impact of the rule on small entities.'' 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.
Thus, an agency may certify that a rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities if the rule
relieves regulatory burden, or otherwise has a positive economic effect
on all of the small entities subject to the rule.
    The new data elements that we are proposing to add have been
requested by stakeholders in an effort to develop or modify their
community emergency response plans. In addition, revising the existing
data elements will make the forms more user-friendly, and thus, will
make reporting easier for facilities and will make the forms more user-
friendly for state and local officials.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    This action contains no Federal mandates under the provisions of
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C.
1532-1538 for State, local, or tribal governments or the private
sector. This proposed rule does not impose any new requirements on
State, local or tribal governments. The data elements we are proposing
to add to the Tier I and Tier II inventory forms will be useful to
state, local and tribal governments to develop or modify their
community emergency response plans. In addition, the proposed revision
to the existing data elements will make the forms more user-friendly.
    This action is also not subject to the requirements of section 203
of UMRA because it contains no regulatory requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small governments.

E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132. The data elements we are proposing
to add to the Tier I and Tier II inventory forms will be useful to
state, local and tribal governments to develop or modify their
community emergency response plan. In addition, the proposed revision
to the existing data elements will make the forms more user-friendly.
    In the spirit of Executive Order 13132, and consistent with EPA
policy to promote communications between EPA and State and local
governments, EPA specifically solicits comment on this proposed action
from State and local officials.

F. Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments)

    This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175, (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The data
elements we are proposing to add to the Tier I and Tier II inventory
forms will be useful to the tribal governments to develop or modify
their community emergency response plans. In addition, the proposed
revision to the existing data elements will make the forms more user-
friendly. This action does not impose any new requirements on tribal
governments. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

G. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks)

    This action is not subject to EO 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997) because it is not economically significant as defined in
Executive Order 12866 and because the Agency does not believe the
environmental health or safety risks addressed by this action present a
disproportionate risk to children. The additional information that we
are proposing to add to the Tier I and Tier II inventory forms will be
useful to State and local officials to assist them in preparing the
community in an emergency situation.

H. Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' as defined in
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)), because it is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (``NTTAA'')

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless doing so would be inconsistent with applicable law or
would otherwise be impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to
provide Congress, through OMB, explanations of when the Agency decides
not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards.
    This proposed rule does not involve technical standards. Therefore,
EPA does not consider the use of any voluntary consensus standards.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR 7629 (February 16, 1994))
establishes Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main
provision directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable
and permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate,
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects of their programs, policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income populations in the United States.
    EPA has determined that this proposed rule does not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not
affect the level of protection provided to human health or the
environment. The new data elements that the Agency is proposing

would be useful to develop or modify the community's emergency response
plan. In addition, revising the existing data elements will make the
forms more user-friendly.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 370

    Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA),
Hazardous chemicals, Emergency and hazardous chemical inventory forms,
Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
requirements, Superfund, Tier I and Tier II inventory forms.

    Dated: August 1, 2011.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, title 40, chapter I of
the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 370--HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL REPORTING: COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW

    1. The authority citation for part 370 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 11021 and 11022.

    2. Section 370.41 is revised to read as follows:

Sec.  370.41  What is Tier I inventory information?

    Tier I information provides State and local officials and the
public with information on the general types and locations of hazardous
chemicals present at your facility during the previous calendar year.
The Tier I information is the minimum information that you must provide
to be in compliance with the inventory reporting requirements of this
part. If you are reporting Tier I information, you must report
aggregate information on hazardous chemicals by hazard categories.
There are two health hazard categories and three physical hazard
categories for purposes of reporting under this part. These five hazard
categories are defined in 40 CFR 370.66. Tier I information includes
all of the following:
    (a) The calendar year for the reporting period.
    (b) The complete name and address of the location of your facility
(include the full street address or state road, city, county, State and
zip code), phone number, latitude, longitude, and the number of full
time employees (FTE).
    (c) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code
for your facility.
    (d) Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) and Risk Management Plan (RMP)
identification numbers, if available.
    (e) The Dun & Bradstreet number of your facility.
    (f) The name, mailing address, phone number and email address of
the owner or operator of the facility.
    (g) The name, mailing address, phone number, Dun & Bradstreet
number and email address of the facility's parent company.
    (h) The name, title, phone number(s) and email address of at least
one local individual that can act as a referral if emergency responders
need assistance in responding to a chemical accident at your facility.
You must also provide an emergency phone number which will be available
24 hours a day, every day.
    (i) An indication whether your facility is subject to the emergency
planning notification requirement under section 302 of EPCRA, codified
in 40 CFR part 355.
    (j) The name, title, phone number, 24-hour phone number, and email
address of the facility emergency coordinator.

    Note to paragraph (j):  Section 303(d)(1) of EPCRA requires
facilities subject to the emergency planning notification
requirement to designate a facility representative who will
participate in the local emergency planning process as a facility
emergency coordinator. EPA encourages facilities that are not
subject to the emergency planning notification requirement also to
provide this information, if available, for effective emergency
planning in your community.

    (k) An indication whether your facility is subject to the chemical
accident prevention requirements under Section 112(r) of the Clean Air
Act, codified in 40 CFR part 68, Chemical Accident Prevention
Provisions, also known as the Risk Management Program regulations.
    (l) The name, title, phone number, and email address of the person
to contact for the information contained in the Tier I form.
    (m) Certification. The owner or operator or the officially
designated representative of the owner or operator must certify that
all information included in the Tier I submission is true, accurate,
and complete as follows: ``I certify under penalty of law that I have
personally examined and am familiar with the information and that based
on my inquiry of those individuals responsible for obtaining the
information, I believe that the submitted information is true,
accurate, and complete.'' This certification shall be accompanied by
your full name, official title, signature, date signed, and total
number of pages in the submission including all attachments.

    Note to paragraph (m):  Some states require electronic reporting
(on-line or via diskettes) and electronic certification. Contact
your state for the specific requirements in that state.

    (n) An indication whether you are including any attachments
(optional).
    (o) An indication whether the information being reported is
identical to that submitted the previous year.
    (p) An estimate (in ranges) of the maximum amount of hazardous
chemicals in each hazard category present at your facility at any time
during the preceding calendar year. You must use codes that correspond
to different ranges. The range codes are provided in Sec.  370.43.
    (q) An estimate (in ranges) of the average daily amount of
hazardous chemicals in each hazard category present at your facility
during the preceding calendar year. You must use codes that correspond
to different ranges. The range codes are provided in Sec.  370.43.
    (r) The maximum number of days that any single hazardous chemical
within each hazard category was present at your facility during the
reporting period.
    (s) The general locations of all applicable chemicals for each
hazard type. General locations should include the names or
identification of buildings, tank fields, lots, sheds or other such
areas. You may also attach one of the following with your Tier I
inventory form.
    (A) A site plan with site indicated for buildings, lots, areas,
etc. throughout your facility.
    (B) A list of site coordinate abbreviations that correspond to
buildings, lots, areas, etc., throughout your facility.
    (C) A description of dikes and other safeguard measures for storage
locations throughout your facility.
    3. Section 370.42 is revised to read as follows:

Sec.  370.42  What is Tier II inventory information?

    Tier II information provides State and local officials and the
public with specific information on amounts and locations of hazardous
chemicals present at your facility during the previous calendar year.
Some states may require you to use a state reporting format including
electronic reporting and certification for submitting your hazardous
chemical inventory. Contact your state for the specific requirements in
that state.
    If you are reporting Tier II information, you must include all of
the following:
    (a) The calendar year of the reporting period.

    (b) The complete name and address of the location of your facility
(include the full street address or state road, city, county, State and
zip code), phone number, latitude, longitude, and the number of full-
time employees (FTE).
    (c) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code
for your facility.
    (d) Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) and Risk Management Plan (RMP)
identification numbers, if available.
    (e) The Dun & Bradstreet number of your facility.
    (f) The name, mailing address, phone number, Dun & Bradstreet
number and email address of the facility's parent company.
    (g) The name, mailing address, phone number and email address of
the owner or operator of the facility.
    (h) The name, title, phone number(s) and email address of at least
one local individual that can act as a referral if emergency responders
need assistance in responding to a chemical accident at your facility.
You must also provide an emergency phone number which will be available
24 hours a day, every day.
    (i) The name, title, phone number and email address of the person
to contact regarding information contained in the Tier II report.
    (j) An indication if your facility is subject to the emergency
planning notification requirement under section 302 of EPCRA, codified
in 40 CFR part 355.
    (k) The name, title, phone number, 24-hour phone number and email
address of the facility emergency coordinator.

    Note to paragraph (k): Section 303(d)(1) of EPCRA requires
facilities subject to the emergency planning notification
requirement to designate a facility representative who will
participate in the local emergency planning process as a facility
emergency coordinator. EPA encourages facilities not subject to the
emergency planning notification requirement also to provide this
information, if available, for effective emergency planning in your
community.

    (l) An indication whether your facility is subject to the chemical
accident prevention requirements under section 112(r) of the Clean Air
Act (CAA), codified in 40 CFR part 68, Chemical Accident Prevention
Provisions, also known as the Risk Management Program regulations.
    (m) Certification. The owner or operator or the officially
designated representative of the owner or operator must certify that
all information included in the Tier II submission is true, accurate,
and complete as follows: ``I certify under penalty of law that I have
personally examined and am familiar with the information and that based
on my inquiry of those individuals responsible for obtaining the
information, I believe that the submitted information is true,
accurate, and complete.'' This certification must be accompanied by
your full name, official title, signature, date signed, and total
number of pages in the submission including all Confidential and Non-
Confidential Information Sheets and all attachments.

    Note to paragraph (m): Some states require electronic reporting
(on-line or via diskettes) and electronic certification. Contact
your state for the specific requirements in that state.

    (n) An indication whether you are including any attachments
(optional).
    (o) An indication whether the information being reported is
identical to that submitted the previous year.
    (p) For each hazardous chemical that you are required to report,
you must:
    (1) Provide the chemical name (or the common name of the chemical)
or the name of the mixture as provided on the Material Safety Data
Sheet (MSDS) and provide the Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) registry
number of the chemical(s) provided on the MSDS. If you are withholding
the name in accordance with trade secret criteria, you must provide the
generic class or category that is structurally descriptive of the
chemical and indicate that the name is withheld because of trade
secrecy. Trade secret criteria are addressed in Sec.  370.64(a). Two
separate entries are provided to make reporting easier for your
facility.

    Note to paragraph (p)(1): As provided in Sec.  370.14(a), if you
have a mixture that is a hazardous chemical on site you have an
option to report the hazardous component or the mixture itself. See
Sec.  370.14 for more information on how to determine if a reporting
threshold is met for a mixture containing a hazardous chemical and
how to report that mixture.

    (2) Indicate whether the chemical is a solid, liquid, or gas; and
whether the chemical is an EHS. If reporting a hazardous chemical
component in the mixture, indicate that it is part of a mixture.

    Note to paragraph (p)(2): As provided in Sec.  370.14(b), for
each specific mixture, EPA encourages facilities to be consistent
with their reporting under EPCRA section 311.

    (3) Provide the name of each EHS in the mixture if you are
reporting a mixture that contains an EHS. As provided in Sec.
370.14(a), you also have an option to report the non-EHS hazardous
components in the mixture.
    (4) Indicate which hazard categories apply to the chemical. The
five hazard categories are defined in Sec.  370.66.
    (5) Provide an estimate (in ranges) of the maximum amount of the
hazardous chemical present at your facility on any single day during
the preceding calendar year. If the hazardous chemical is a mixture,
provide an estimate of the total amount of the mixture. If the mixture
contains any EHS, provide the total amount of each EHS in that mixture.
You must use codes that correspond to different ranges. The range codes
are in Sec.  370.43.
    (6) Provide an estimate (in ranges) of the average daily amount of
the hazardous chemical present at your facility during the preceding
calendar year. If the hazardous chemical is a mixture, provide an
estimate of the average daily amount of the mixture. If the mixture
contains any EHS, provide the average daily amount of each EHS in the
mixture. You must use codes that correspond to different ranges. The
range codes are in Sec.  370.43.
    (7) Provide the maximum number of days that the hazardous chemical
was present at your facility during the preceding calendar year.
    (8) Provide the type of storage for the hazardous chemical or the
mixture containing the hazardous chemical at your facility. Examples
for type of storage: Above-ground tank, plastic or non-metallic drum,
steel drum, cylinder, rail car, etc.
    (9) Provide the storage conditions for the hazardous chemical or
the mixture containing the hazardous chemical at your facility.
Examples for type of storage conditions: Ambient pressure, less than
ambient temperature/pressure, cryogenic conditions, etc.
    (10)(i) Provide a brief description of the precise location(s) of
the hazardous chemical or the mixture at your facility. You may also
attach one of the following with your Tier II inventory form.
    (A) A site plan with site indicated for buildings, lots, areas,
etc. throughout your facility.
    (B) A list of site coordinate abbreviations that correspond to
buildings, lots, areas, etc., throughout your facility.
    (C) A description of dikes and other safeguard measures for storage
locations throughout your facility.
    (ii) Under EPCRA section 324, you may choose to withhold from
disclosure to the public the location information for a specific
chemical. If you choose to withhold the location information from
disclosure to the public, you must clearly indicate that the
information is ``confidential.'' You must provide the

confidential location information on a separate sheet from the other
Tier II information (which will be disclosed to the public), and attach
the Confidential Location Information Sheet to the other Tier II
information. Indicate any attachments you are including.
    4. Section 370.43 is revised as follows:

Sec.  370.43  What codes are used to report Tier I and Tier II
inventory information?

    (a) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, you must
use the following codes to report the maximum amount and average daily
amount when reporting Tier I or Tier II inventory information:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Weight range in pounds
       Range codes        ----------------------------------------------
                               From                    To
------------------------------------------------------------------------
01.......................            0  99.
02.......................          100  499.
03.......................          500  999.
04.......................        1,000  4,999.
05.......................        5,000  9,999.
06.......................       10,000  24,999.
07.......................       25,000  49,999.
08.......................       50,000  74,999.
09.......................       75,000  99,999.
10.......................      100,000  499,999.
11.......................      500,000  999,999.
12.......................    1,000,000  9,999,999.
13.......................   10,000,000  Greater than 10
                                        million.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Note to paragraph (a): To convert gas or liquid volume to weight
in pounds, multiply by an appropriate density factor.

    (b) Your SERC or LEPC may provide other range codes for reporting
maximum amount and average daily amount, or may require reporting of
specific amounts. You may use your SERC's or LEPC's range codes (or
specific amounts) provided the ranges are not broader than the ranges
in paragraph (a) of this section.

[FR Doc. 2011-19900 Filed 8-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


                                 ATTACHMENT B

               DfE Formulator Program:  Product Information Form

                           OMB Control No. 2070-0178

	The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 25.5 hours per response for formulators of cleaning and non-cleaning products and 9.5 hours per response for partners wishing to add third-party partners and products, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering information, and completing and reviewing the application.  Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460.  Include the OMB control number in any correspondence.  Do not send the completed application to this address.


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 36331]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15488]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP15-515-000]

Florida Gas Transmission Company LLC; Notice of Request Under
Blanket Authorization

    Take notice that on June 9, 2015, Florida Gas Transmission Company,
LLC (FGT), 1300 Main Street, Houston, Texas 77002 filed a prior notice
request pursuant to sections 157.205, 157.208(b), and 157.216(b) of the
Commission's regulations under the Natural Gas Act for authorization to
relocate several sections of 8-inch and 10-inch diameter laterals
(totaling 6.8 miles) due to highway construction and replace them with
approximately 4.3 miles of 12-inch pipe. The project is located south
of Gandy Blvd., in Pinellas County, Florida (referred to by FGT as the
12-Inch St. Petersburg Lateral Relocation Project), all as more fully
set forth in the application which is on file with the Commission and
open to public inspection. The filing may also be viewed on the web at
http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support
at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to
Stephen T. Veatch, Senior Director, Certificates, Florida Gas
Transmission Company, LLC, PO Box 4967, Houston, Texas 77210-4967, by
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    Any person may, within 60 days after the issuance of the instant
notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's
Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of
intervention. Any person filing to intervene or the Commission's staff
may, pursuant to section 157.205 of the Commission's Regulations under
the Natural Gas Act (NGA) (18 CFR 157.205) file a protest to the
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day
after the time allowed for protest. If a protest is filed and not
withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest,
the instant request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to section 7 of the NGA.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests, and interventions via the internet in lieu of paper. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site (www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.

    Dated: June 18, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-15488 Filed 6-23-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


From: Spells, Charlene
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 11:01 AM
To<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: Cozzie, David<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Moore, Bruce<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Schillo, Bruce<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: RE: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563 for EPA Final Guide -- Control Technique Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry (RIN 2060-ZA22)

Aaron,

Attached is the revised response to interagency comments in RLSO.

Charlene E. Spells
U.S. EPA
OAQPS/SPPD
RTP, NC 27711
Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
From: Spells, Charlene
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 5:38 PM
To<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: Cozzie, David<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Moore, Bruce<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Schillo, Bruce<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: RE: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563 for EPA Final Guide -- Control Technique Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry (RIN 2060-ZA22)

Aaron,

Below our mark up of language from the most recent response to interagency comments.

      The RACT recommendation for fugitive emissions from well sites addresses well sites with an average production of greater than 15 barrel equivalents per well per day (15 barrel equivalents).  We received comments supporting our approach to not establishing RACT for wells with an average production less than 15 barrel equivalents, as well as comments encouraging EPA to establish RACT for these low production well sites.  As we indicated in the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and in our review of the comments submitted on the CTG, we did not receive data showing that distinguishing the potential emissions from low production well sites from the potential emissions associated with than non-low production well sites.  Rather, the data information that were was provided on the NSPS indicated that the potential emissions from these well sites could be as significant as the emissions from non-low production well sites because the type of equipment and the well pressures are more than likely the same.  However, the EPA notes that the draft CTG did not provide sufficient detail on the scope and impacts of including these low production wells in the CTG to allow the public an opportunity for extensive, detailed comments on their inclusion.  Thus, given the EPA's approach to the development of the CTG, which featured the opportunity for the public to fully engage on this issue with regard to the CTG, and in light of the absence of meaningful detail on scope and impacts, the EPA has decided not to establish RACT for wells with an average production of less than 15 barrel equivalents at this time.  The EPA notes, in contrast, that for the New Source Performance Standards, the EPA was able to move forward with standards for the low production well sites because the Agency provided more discussion and analysis of the scope and impacts associated with low production wells.  In addition, unlike the New Source Performance Standards, the RACT determination specifically focuses on reduction of VOC emissions, rather than emissions of both VOCs and methane.

Charlene E. Spells
U.S. EPA
OAQPS/SPPD
RTP, NC 27711
Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
From: Szabo, Aaron<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 5:56 PM
To: Spells, Charlene<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: Cozzie, David<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Szabo, Aaron<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563 for EPA Final Guide -- Control Technique Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry (RIN 2060-ZA22)

Below please find the summary of interagency comments under EO 12866 and 13563 for the EPA draft final guide entitled, "Control Technique Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry" (RIN 2060-ZA22) in response to the most recent response to interagency comments.

      The RACT recommendation for fugitive emissions from well sites addresses well sites with an average production of greater than 15 barrel equivalents per well per day (15 barrel equivalents).  We received comments supporting our approach to not establishing RACT for wells with an average production less than 15 barrel equivalents, as well as comments encouraging EPA to establish RACT for these low production well sites.  As we indicated in the New Source Performance Standards, we did not receive data showing that low production well sites have lower VOC emissions than non-low production well sites.  Rather, the data that were provided indicated that the potential emissions from these well sites could be as significant as the emissions from non-low production well sites because the type of equipment and the well pressures are more than likely the same.  However, the EPA notes that the draft CTG did not provide sufficient detail on the scope and impacts of including these low production wells in the CTG to allow the public an opportunity for extensive, detailed comments on their inclusion.  Thus, given the EPA's approach to the development of the CTG, which featured the opportunity for the public to fully engage on this issue with regard to the CTG, and in light of the absence of meaningful detail on scope and impacts, the EPA has decided not to establish RACT for wells with an average production of less than 15 barrel equivalents at this time.  The EPA notes, in contrast, that for the New Source Performance Standards, the EPA was able to move forward with standards for the low production well sites because the Agency provided more discussion and analysis of the scope and impacts associated with low production wells.  In addition, unlike the New Source Performance Standards, the RACT determination specifically focuses on reduction of VOC emissions, rather than emissions of both VOCs and methane.

Aaron L. Szabo
Policy Analyst
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
Office of Management and Budget
202-395-3621
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49986-49987]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19997]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0607; Airspace Docket No. 13-ACE-13]

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Loup City, NE

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E airspace at Loup
City, NE. Controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate new Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAP) at Loup City Municipal Airport.
The FAA is taking this action to enhance the safety and management of
Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations for SIAPs at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 30, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200

New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. You must identify the docket number FAA-
2013-0607/Airspace Docket No. 13-ACE-13, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in
the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1-800-
647-5527), is on the ground floor of the building at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone: 817-321-
7716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2013-0607/
Airspace Docket No. 13-ACE-13.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Central Service Center, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking<PHONE_NUMBER>, to
request a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    This action proposes to amend Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR), part 71 by establishing Class E airspace extending upward
from 700 feet above the surface within a 7.7-mile radius to accommodate
new standard instrument approach procedures at Loup City Municipal
Airport, Loup City, NE. Controlled airspace is needed for the safety
and management of IFR operations at the airport.
    Class E airspace areas are published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9W, dated August 8, 2012 and effective September 15, 2012, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designation listed in this document would be published subsequently in
the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106 describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would establish controlled airspace at Loup City Municipal
Airport, Loup City, NE.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9W,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2012, and
effective September 15, 2012, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ACE NE E5 Loup City, NE [New]

Loup City Municipal Airport, NE
    (Lat. 41[deg]17'12'' N., long. 98[deg]59'25'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7.7-mile radius of Loup City Municipal Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on August 2, 2013.
David P. Medina,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2013-19997 Filed 8-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 99 (Wednesday, May 22, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23557-23559]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10599]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. Ic19-16-000]

Commission Information Collection Activities (Ferc-556); Comment
Request; Extension

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of information collection and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or
FERC) is soliciting public comment on the currently approved
information collection FERC-556 (Certification of Qualifying Facility
(QF) Status for a Small Power Production or Cogeneration Facility) and
submitting the information collection to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review. Any interested person may file comments
directly with OMB and should address a copy of those comments to the
Commission as explained below. On March 14, 2019, the Commission
published a Notice in the Federal Register in Docket No. IC19-16-000
requesting public comments. The Commission received no public comments,
as stated in the related submittal to OMB.

DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due June 21, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Comments filed with OMB, identified by OMB Control No. 1902-
0075, should be sent via email to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Attention: Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission Desk Officer.
    A copy of the comments should also be sent to the Commission, in
Docket No. IC19-16-000, by either of the following methods:
     eFiling at Commission's website: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp.
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Instructions: All submissions must be formatted and filed in
accordance with submission guidelines at: http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp. For user assistance, contact FERC Online Support
by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by phone at:<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll-free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> for TTY.

    Docket: Users interested in receiving automatic notification of
activity in this docket or in viewing/downloading comments and
issuances in this docket may do so at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/docs-filing.asp.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, and fax at (202)
273-0873.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: FERC-556, Certification of Qualifying Facility (QF) Status
for a Small Power Production or Cogeneration Facility.
    OMB Control No.: 1902-0075.
    Type of Request: Three-year extension of the FERC-556 information
collection requirements with no changes to the current reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
    Abstract: Form No. 556 is required to implement sections 201 and
210 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 \1\ (PURPA).
FERC is authorized, under those sections, to encourage cogeneration and
small power production and to prescribe such rules as necessary in
order to carry out the statutory directives.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 16 U.S.C. 796, 824a-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A primary statutory objective is efficient use of energy resources
and facilities by electric utilities. One means of achieving this goal
is to encourage production of electric power by cogeneration facilities
which make use of reject heat associated with commercial or industrial
processes, and by small power production facilities which use other
wastes and renewable resources. PURPA encourages the development of
small power production facilities and cogeneration facilities that meet
certain technical and corporate criteria through establishment of
various regulatory benefits. Facilities that meet these criteria are
called Qualifying Facilities (QFs).
    FERC's regulations in 18 CFR part 292, as relevant here, specify:
(a) The certification procedures which must be followed by owners or
operators of small power production and cogeneration facilities; (b)
the criteria which must be met; (c) the information which must be
submitted to FERC in order to obtain qualifying status; and (d) the
PURPA benefits which are available to QFs to encourage small power
production and cogeneration.
    18 CFR part 292 also exempts QFs from certain corporate,
accounting, reporting, and rate regulation requirements of the Federal
Power Act,\2\ certain state laws, and the Public Utility Holding
Company Act of 2005.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 16 U.S.C. 791, et seq.
    \3\ 42 U.S.C. 16, 451-63.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Type of Respondents: Facilities that are self-certifying their
status as a cogenerator or small power producer or that are submitting
an application for FERC certification of their status as a cogenerator
or small power producer.
    Estimate of Annual Burden: \4\ The Commission estimates the burden
and cost for this information collection as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ ``Burden'' is the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. For further
explanation of what is included in the information collection
burden, refer to Title 5 Code of Federal Regulations 1320.3.

                       FERC-556--Certification of Qualifying Facility Status for a Small Power Production or Cogeneration Facility
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Annual
                                                             number of                 Average burden hours                                    Cost per
        Facility type           Filing type     Number of    responses   Total number   & cost per response    Total annual burden hours &    respondent
                                               respondents      per      of responses           \5\            total annual cost (rounded)       ($)
                                                             respondent                                                                       (rounded)
                                                       (1)          (2)   (1) * (2) =  (4).................  (3) * (4) = (5)...............    (5) / (1)
                                                                                (3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cogeneration Facility >1 MW   Self-                     63         1.25         78.75  1.5 hrs.; $118.5....  118.125 hrs.; $9,332..........         $148
 \6\.                          certification.
                                              ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cogeneration Facility >1 MW.  Application for            1         1.25          1.25  50 hrs.; $3,950.....  62.5 hrs.; $4,938.............        4,938
                               FERC
                               certification.
Small Power Production        Self-                  2,698         1.25       3,372.5  1.5 hrs.; $118.5....  5,058.75 hrs.; $399,641.......          148
 Facility >1 MW.               certification.
Small Power Production        Application for            0         1.25             0  50 hrs.; $3,950.....  0 hrs.; $0....................            0
 Facility >1 MW.               FERC
                               certification.
Cogeneration and Small Power  Self-                    692         1.25           865  1.5 hrs.; $118.5....  1,297.5 hrs.; $102,503........          148
 Production Facility <=1 MW    certification.
 (Self-Certification) \7\.
                             ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total...................  ...............        3,454  ...........       4,317.5  ....................  6,536.875 hrs.; $516,413.13...  ...........
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The estimated burden in the Paperwork Reduction Act Notice on page
1 of the FERC Form 556 will be corrected to provide the current burden
estimates (shown above). It will read ``[t]he estimated burden for
completing the FERC Form No. 556, including gathering and reporting
information, is as follows: 1.5 hours for self-certification of a small
power production facility, 1.5 hours for self-certifications of a
cogeneration facility, 50 hours for an application for Commission
certification of a small power production facility, and 50 hours for an
application for Commission certification of a cogeneration facility.''
The reporting requirements are not changing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Commission staff believes that industry is similarly
situated in terms of wages and benefits. Therefore, cost estimates
are based on FERC's 2018 average annual wage (and benefits) for a
full-time employee of $164,820 (or $79.00/hour).
    \6\ MW = megawatt.
    \7\ Not required to file.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comments: Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden and
cost of the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information collection; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.

    Dated: May 15, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-10599 Filed 5-21-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P