[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 22, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50650-50651]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20658]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2011-1432; Airspace Docket No. 11-ACE-25]

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Boone, IA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class E airspace at Boone, IA.
Decommissioning of the Boone non-directional beacon (NDB) at Boone
Municipal Airport has made reconfiguration necessary for standard
instrument approach procedures and for the safety and management of
Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 9, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001. You
must identify the docket number FAA-2011-1432/Airspace Docket No. 11-
ACE-25, at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments
through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the
public docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any
final disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket
Office (telephone 1-800-647-5527), is on the ground floor of the
building at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone: (817) 321-
7716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2011-1432/
Airspace Docket No. 11-ACE-25.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Central Service Center, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking<PHONE_NUMBER>, to
request a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    This action proposes to amend Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR), part 71 by modifying Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface for new standard instrument approach
procedures at Boone Municipal Airport, Boone, IA. Airspace
reconfiguration is necessary due to the decommissioning of the Boone
NDB and the cancellation of the NDB approach. Controlled airspace is
necessary for the safety and management of IFR operations at the
airport.
    Class E airspace areas are published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9V, dated August 9, 2011 and effective September 15, 2011, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designation listed in this document would be published subsequently in
the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106 describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend controlled airspace at Boone Municipal Airport,
Boone, IA.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order
7400.9V, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 9,
2011, and effective September 15, 2011, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ACE IA E5 Boone, IA [Amended]

Boone Municipal Airport, IA
    (Lat. 42[deg]02'58'' N., long. 93[deg]50'51'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of Boone Municipal Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX on August 1, 2012.
David P. Medina,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2012-20658 Filed 8-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4901-13-P


[Federal Register: August 7, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 153)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 45888-45890]
[DOCID:fr07au08-14]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0848; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-082-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Saab Model SAAB 2000 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    Subsequent to accidents involving Fuel Tank System explosions in
flight * * * and on ground, * * * Special Federal Aviation
Regulation 88 (SFAR88) * * * required * * * a design review against
explosion risks.

* * * * *
The unsafe condition is the potential of ignition sources inside fuel
tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result
in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane. The
proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 8,
2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0848;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-082-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite

comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by
the closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those
comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2008-0031, dated February 15, 2008 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    Subsequent to accidents involving Fuel Tank System explosions in
flight * * * and on ground, the FAA has published Special Federal
Aviation Regulation 88 (SFAR88) in June 2001. In their Letters
referenced 04/00/02/07/01-L296 dated March 4th, 2002 and 04/00/02/
07/03-L024, dated February 3rd, 2003, the Joint Aviation Authorities
(JAA) recommended the application of a similar regulation to the
National Aviation Authorities (NAA).
    Under current European Union regulation, all holders of type
certificates for passenger transport aircraft with either a
passenger capacity of 30 or more, or a payload capacity of 7,500
pounds (3,402 kg) or more, which have received their certification
after January 1st, 1958, are required to conduct a design review
against explosion risks.
    This Airworthiness Directive (AD), which is the result of one of
these design reviews, requires a wiring modification of the FQIS
(Fuel Quantity Indication System) Signal conditioner 28VDC (volts
direct current) supply and replacement of the Fuel Pump harness
inside the wing tanks (both LH and RH (left- and right-hand)).

The unsafe condition is the potential of ignition sources inside fuel
tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result
in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane. The
corrective actions include functional and operational tests. You may
obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
    The FAA has examined the underlying safety issues involved in fuel
tank explosions on several large transport airplanes, including the
adequacy of existing regulations, the service history of airplanes
subject to those regulations, and existing maintenance practices for
fuel tank systems. As a result of those findings, we issued a
regulation titled ``Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design Review,
Flammability Reduction and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements''
(66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). In addition to new airworthiness standards
for transport airplanes and new maintenance requirements, this rule
included Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 (``SFAR 88,''
Amendment 21-78, and subsequent Amendments 21-82 and 21-83).
    Among other actions, SFAR 88 requires certain type design (i.e.,
type certificate (TC) and supplemental type certificate (STC)) holders
to substantiate that their fuel tank systems can prevent ignition
sources in the fuel tanks. This requirement applies to type design
holders for large turbine-powered transport airplanes and for
subsequent modifications to those airplanes. It requires them to
perform design reviews and to develop design changes and maintenance
procedures if their designs do not meet the new fuel tank safety
standards. As explained in the preamble to the rule, we intended to
adopt airworthiness directives to mandate any changes found necessary
to address unsafe conditions identified as a result of these reviews.
    In evaluating these design reviews, we have established four
criteria intended to define the unsafe conditions associated with fuel
tank systems that require corrective actions. The percentage of
operating time during which fuel tanks are exposed to flammable
conditions is one of these criteria. The other three criteria address
the failure types under evaluation: Single failures, single failures in
combination with a latent condition(s), and in-service failure
experience. For all four criteria, the evaluations included
consideration of previous actions taken that may mitigate the need for
further action.
    The Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA) has issued a regulation that
is similar to SFAR 88. (The JAA is an associated body of the European
Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC) representing the civil aviation
regulatory authorities of a number of European States who have agreed
to cooperate in developing and implementing common safety regulatory
standards and procedures.) Under this regulation, the JAA stated that
all members of the ECAC that hold type certificates for transport
category airplanes are required to conduct a design review against
explosion risks.
    We have determined that the actions identified in this AD are
necessary to reduce the potential of ignition sources inside fuel
tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result
in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.

Relevant Service Information

    Saab has issued Service Bulletin 2000-28-013, dated October 11,
2007; and Service Bulletin 2000-28-014, Revision 02, dated January 23,
2008. The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 6 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 80 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $14,040 per product. Where
the service information lists required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these
costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $122,640, or $20,440 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Saab Aircraft AB: Docket No. FAA-2008-0848; Directorate Identifier
2008-NM-082-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by September 8, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Saab Model SAAB 2000 airplanes,
certificated in any category, all serial numbers.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    Subsequent to accidents involving Fuel Tank System explosions in
flight * * * and on ground, the FAA has published Special Federal
Aviation Regulation 88 (SFAR88) in June 2001. In their Letters
referenced 04/00/02/07/01-L296 dated March 4th, 2002 and 04/00/02/
07/03-L024, dated February 3rd, 2003, the Joint Aviation Authorities
(JAA) recommended the application of a similar regulation to the
National Aviation Authorities (NAA).
    Under current European Union regulation, all holders of type
certificates for passenger transport aircraft with either a
passenger capacity of 30 or more, or a payload capacity of 7,500
pounds (3,402 kg) or more, which have received their certification
after January 1st, 1958, are required to conduct a design review
against explosion risks.
    This Airworthiness Directive (AD), which is the result of one of
these design reviews, requires a wiring modification of the FQIS
(Fuel Quantity Indication System) Signal conditioner 28VDC (volts
direct current) supply and replacement of the Fuel Pump harness
inside the wing tanks (both LH and RH (left- and right-hand)).

The unsafe condition is the potential of ignition sources inside
fuel tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could
result in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.
The corrective actions include functional and operational tests.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Within 72 months after the effective date of this AD,
replace the fuel pump harness inside each (both left- and right-
hand) inboard wing fuel tank in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Saab Service Bulletin 2000-028-013, dated October
11, 2007 (Modification 6250), including a follow-up functional test
and operational test.
    (2) Within 72 months after the effective date of this AD, modify
the wiring of the 28 VDC (volts direct current) supply to the signal
conditioner and the 132VP (feed through connector) in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Saab Service Bulletin 2000-
28-014, Revision 02, dated January 23, 2008 (Modification 6251),
including follow-up operational test.
    (3) Actions done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Saab Service Bulletin 2000-28-014, Revision 01,
dated November 6, 2007, are acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (f)(2) of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (425)
227-1149. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which
the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI)
in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI,
your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2008-0031, dated February 15, 2008; Saab Service Bulletin
2000-028-013, dated October 11, 2007; and Saab Service Bulletin
2000-28-014, Revision 02, dated January 23, 2008 for related
information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 29, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-18202 Filed 8-6-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58021-58022]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23065]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 520 and 558

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0002]

New Animal Drugs for Use in Animal Feeds; Monensin

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal
drug regulations to remove a warning for growing cattle on pasture or
in dry lot and to codify all monensin free-choice Type C medicated
feeds in 21 CFR part 558. This action is being taken to improve the
accuracy of the regulations.

DATES: This rule is effective September 19, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina C. Edwards, Center for
Veterinary Medicine (HFV-126), Food and Drug Administration, 7500
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER>, Email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA has noticed that the animal drug
regulations for certain monensin free-choice Type C medicated feeds for
growing cattle on pasture or in dry lot (slaughter, stocker, and feeder
cattle; and dairy and beef replacement heifers) reflect a warning
statement regarding the overdosing risk posed by uneaten free-choice
feeds (refusals) that is unnecessary and not required on product
labeling.
    Refusals of free-choice cattle feeds, including compressed blocks,
granules, and liquids, are unlikely in practice to be fed to another
group of cattle. These products are used almost exclusively in pasture-
based systems where the product is placed in the pasture with the
animals and is left until consumed. In addition, it is extremely
unlikely that these free-choice cattle feeds would be fed to another
production class because these products generally are not appropriate
for the nutritional needs of another production class.
    For these reasons, FDA is revising the regulations to exclude
monensin free-choice Type C medicated feeds for growing cattle on
pasture or in dry lot from the requirement to include a warning
statement. This action is being taken to improve the accuracy of the
regulations.
    This rule does not meet the definition of ``rule'' in 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(A) because it is a rule of ``particular applicability.''
Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements
in 5 U.S.C. 801-808.

List of Subjects

21 CFR Part 520

    Animal drugs.

21 CFR Part 558

    Animal drugs, Animal feeds.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and
redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR parts 520 and
558 are amended as follows:

PART 520--ORAL DOSAGE FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 520 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 360b.

Sec. Sec.  520.1448 and 520.1448a  [Removed]

0
2. Remove Sec. Sec.  520.1448 and 520.1448a.

PART 558--NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR USE IN ANIMAL FEEDS

0
3. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 558 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b, 371.

0
4. In Sec.  558.355, revise paragraphs (d)(7)(vii), (d)(10)(i), and
(d)(10)(ii); remove and reserve paragraph (f)(3)(v); redesignate
paragraph (f)(7) as paragraph (f)(8); and add new paragraph (f)(7) to
read as follows:

Sec.  558.355  Monensin.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (7) * * *
    (vii) If feed refusals containing monensin are fed to other groups
of cattle, the concentration of monensin in the refusals and amount of
refusals fed should be taken into consideration to prevent monensin
overdosing (see paragraphs (d)(10)(i) and (d)(10)(ii) of this section).
* * * * *
    (10) * * *
    (i) Cattle (as described in paragraphs (f)(3)(i) through
(f)(3)(xii) of this section): See paragraphs (d)(6), (d)(7)(i),
(d)(7)(v), (d)(7)(vii), and (d)(7)(viii) of this section. Paragraph
(d)(7)(vii) of this section does not apply to free-choice Type C
medicated feeds as defined in Sec.  510.455 of this chapter.
    (ii) Dairy cows (as described in paragraphs (f)(3)(xiii) and
(f)(3)(xiv) of this section): See paragraphs (d)(6), (d)(7)(i),
(d)(7)(vii), (d)(7)(viii), and (d)(7)(ix) of this section. Paragraph
(d)(7)(vii) of this section does not apply to free-choice Type C
medicated feeds as defined in Sec.  510.455 of this chapter.
* * * * *
    (f) * * *
    (7) Free-choice feeds--(i) Amount. 150 milligrams per pound of
protein-mineral block (0.033 percent).
    (a) [Reserved]
    (b) Conditions of use--(1) Indications for use. For increased rate
of weight gain; and for prevention and control of coccidiosis caused by
Eimeria bovis and E. zuernii in pasture cattle (slaughter, stocker,
feeder, and dairy and beef replacement heifers) which may require
supplemental feed.
    (2) Limitations. Provide 50 to 200 milligrams of monensin (0.34 to
1.33 pounds of block) per head per day, at least 1 block per 10 to 12
head of cattle. Roughage must be available at all times. Do not allow
animals access to other protein blocks, salt or mineral, while being
fed this product. The effectiveness of this block in cull cows and
bulls has not been established. See paragraph (d)(10)(i) of this
section.
    (ii) Amount. 400 milligrams per pound of protein-mineral block
(0.088 percent).
    (a) Sponsor. See No. 067949 in Sec.  510.600(c) of this chapter.
    (b) Conditions of use--(1) Indications for use. For increased rate
of weight gain in pasture cattle (slaughter, stocker, feeder, and dairy
and beef replacement heifers).
    (2) Limitations. Provide 80 to 200 milligrams of monensin (0.2 to
0.5 pounds of block) per head per day, at least 1 block per 5 head of
cattle. Feed blocks continuously. Do not feed salt or minerals
containing salt. The effectiveness of this block in cull cows and bulls
has not been established. See paragraph (d)(10)(i) of this section.
    (iii) Amount. 175 milligrams per pound of protein-mineral block
(0.038 percent).
    (a) Sponsor. See No. 066071 in Sec.  510.600(c) of this chapter.
    (b) Conditions of use--(1) Indications for use. For increased rate
of weight gain in pasture cattle (slaughter, stocker, and feeder).
    (2) Limitations. Provide 40 to 200 milligrams of monensin (0.25 to
1.13 pounds or 4 to 18 ounces of block) per head per day, at least 1
block per 4 head of cattle. Do not allow cattle access to salt or
mineral while being fed this product. Ingestion by cattle of monensin
at levels of 600 milligrams per head per day and higher has been fatal.
The effectiveness of this block in cull cows and bulls has not been
established. See paragraph (d)(10)(i) of this section.
    (iv) Amount. 400 milligrams per pound of block (0.088 percent).
    (a) Sponsor. See No. 051267 in Sec.  510.600(c) of this chapter.
    (b) Conditions of use--(1) Indications for use. For increased rate
of weight gain in pasture cattle (slaughter, stocker, feeder, and dairy
and beef replacement heifers).
    (2) Limitations. Provide 50 to 200 milligrams of monensin (2 to 8
ounces of block) per head per day, at least 1 block per 5 head of
cattle. Feed blocks continuously. Do not feed salt or mineral
supplements in addition to the blocks. Ingestion by cattle of monensin
at levels of 600 milligrams per head per day and higher has been fatal.
The effectiveness of this block in cull cows and bulls has not been
established. See paragraph (d)(10)(i) of this section.
* * * * *

    Dated: September 13, 2012.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2012-23065 Filed 9-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register: August 23, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 162)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 51651-51654]
[DOCID:fr23au10-3]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-0037; Directorate Identifier 2007-NE-41-AD;
Amendment 39-16404; AD 2010-17-12]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd. & Co. KG.
(RRD) Models Tay 650-15 and Tay 651-54 Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    Strip results from some of the engines listed in the
applicability section of this AD revealed excessively corroded low-
pressure turbine disks stage 2 and stage 3. The corrosion is
considered to be caused by the environment in which these engines
are operated. Following a life assessment based on the strip
findings it is concluded that inspections for corrosion attack are
required. The action specified by this European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD 2008-0122 was intended to avoid a failure of a low-
pressure turbine disk stage 2 or stage 3 due to potential corrosion
problems which could result in uncontained engine failure and damage
to the airplane. It has been later realized that the same unsafe
condition could potentially occur on more serial numbers for the Tay
650-15 engines and on the Tay 651-54 engines. This AD, superseding
EASA AD 2008-0122, retaining its requirements, is therefore issued
to expand the Applicability in adding further engine serial numbers
for the Tay 650-15 engines and in adding the Tay 651-54 engines.

    We are issuing this AD to detect corrosion that could cause the
stage 2 or stage 3 disk of the LP turbine to fail and result in an
uncontained failure of the engine.

DATES: This AD becomes effective September 27, 2010. The Director of
the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in this AD as of September 27, 2010.

ADDRESSES: The Docket Operations office is located at Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-
0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Riley, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 by superseding AD 2009-22-
01, Amendment 39-16052 (74 FR 55121, October 27, 2009), with a proposed
AD. The proposed AD applies to RRD Models Tay 650-15 and Tay 651-54
turbofan engines. We published the proposed AD in the Federal Register
on May 6, 2010 (75 FR 24825). That action proposed to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    Strip results from some of the engines listed in the
applicability section of this AD revealed excessively corroded low-
pressure turbine disks stage 2 and stage 3. The corrosion is
considered to be caused by the environment in which these engines
are operated. Following a life assessment based on the strip
findings it is concluded that inspections for corrosion attack are
required. The action specified by this European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD 2008-0122 was intended to avoid a failure of a low-
pressure turbine disk stage 2 or stage 3 due to potential corrosion
problems which could result in uncontained engine failure and damage
to the airplane. It has been later realized that the same unsafe
condition could potentially occur on more serial numbers for the Tay
650-15 engines and on the Tay 651-54 engines. This AD, superseding
EASA AD 2008-0122, retaining its requirements, is therefore issued
to expand the Applicability in adding further engine serial numbers
for the Tay 650-15 engines and in adding the Tay 651-54 engines.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.

Request to Reference the Current EASA Type Certificate Approval

    One commenter, RRD, requests that we revise the AD to reference the
current EASA type certificate approval rather than the original United
Kingdom type certificate approval.
    We agree that the current type certificate approval is from EASA,
but since we do not repeat the preamble section of the proposed AD that
references this information, we did not change the AD. We will
reference the correct information in future AD actions.

Request To Correct a Typographical Error

    RRD requests that we correct a typographical error under FAA's
Determination and Requirements of this Proposed AD. Specifically,
change ``HP'' to ``LP''.
    We agree that ``HP'' should be ``LP''. However, that paragraph is
not repeated in the Final Rule. We did not change the AD.

Request To Remove Gulfstream G-IV Airplane From the Applicability

    RRD requests that we delete the Gulfstream G-IV airplane from the
applicability, as the Tay 650-15 and Tay 651-54 turbofan engines are
not installed on that airplane.
    We agree and removed that airplane from the applicability.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will
affect about three Tay 651-54 engines installed on airplanes of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take about three work-hours per
engine to comply with this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-
hour. Required parts will cost about $40,000 per engine. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the AD on U.S. operators to be
$120,765.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (phone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is provided in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-16052 (74 FR
55121, October 27, 2009), and by adding a new airworthiness directive,
Amendment 39-16404, to read as follows:

2010-17-12 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) (formerly
Rolls-Royce plc, Derby, England): Amendment 39-16404. Docket No.
FAA-2007-0037; Directorate Identifier 2007-NE-41-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective
September 27, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2009-22-01, Amendment 39-16052.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to:
    (1) RRD model Tay 650-15 turbofan engines that have a serial
number listed in Table 1, Table 2, or Table 3 of this AD;
    (2) All model Tay 651-54 turbofan engines; and
    (3) Engines with a low-pressure (LP) turbine module M05300AA
installed. These engines are installed on, but not limited to,
Fokker F.28 Mark 0070 and 0100 airplanes, and Boeing 727 airplanes
modified in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate No.
SA8472SW.

 Table 1--Affected Tay 650-15 Engines by Serial Number (Carried Forward
                  From AD 2008-10-14 and AD 2009-22-01)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            Engine Serial No.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
17251
17255
17256
17273
17275
17280
17281
17282
17300
17301
17327
17332
17365
17393
17437
17443
17470
17520
17521
17523
17539
17542
17556
17561
17562
17563
17580
17581
17612
17618
17635
17637
17645
17661
17686
17699
17701
17702
17736
17737
17738
17739
17741
17742
17808
------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Table 2--Affected Tay 650-15 Engines by Serial Number (Carried Forward
                           From AD 2009-22-01)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            Engine Serial No.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
17249
17303
17358
17370
17425
17426
17433
17438
17445
17446
17460
17474
17478
17490
17491
17517
17518
17522
17534
17535
17536
17538
17540
17541
17552
17553
17585
17613
17723
17724
17740
17759
17760
17807
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 3--Affected Tay 650-15 Engines by Serial Number (Added New in This
                                   AD)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            Engine Serial No.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
17344
17360
17376
17413
17537
17694
17698
17707
17716
17718
17719
17731
17756
17757
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reason

    (d) Strip results from some of the engines listed in the
applicability section of this AD revealed excessively corroded low-
pressure turbine disks stage 2 and stage 3. The corrosion is
considered to be caused by the environment in which these engines
are operated. Following a life assessment based on the strip
findings it is concluded that inspections for corrosion attack are
required. The action specified by this European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD 2008-0122 was intended to avoid a failure of a low-
pressure turbine disk stage 2 or stage 3 due to potential corrosion
problems which could result in uncontained engine failure and damage
to the airplane. It has been later realized that the same unsafe
condition could potentially occur on more serial numbers for the Tay
650-15 engines and on the Tay 651-54 engines. This AD, superseding
EASA AD 2008-0122, retaining its requirements, is therefore issued
to expand the Applicability in adding further engine serial numbers
for the Tay 650-15 engines and in adding the Tay 651-54 engines.
    We are issuing this AD to detect corrosion that could cause the
stage 2 or stage 3 disk of the LP turbine to fail and result in an
uncontained failure of the engine.

Actions and Compliance

    (e) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Prior to accumulating 11,700 flight cycles (FC) since new of
disk life, and thereafter at intervals not exceeding 11,700 FC of
disk life, inspect the LP turbine disks stage 2 and stage 3 for
corrosion using RRD Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. TAY-72-A1524,
Revision 3, dated March 24, 2010.
    (2) For engines with disk life that already exceed 11,700 FC on
the effective date of this AD, perform the inspection within 90 days
after the effective date of this AD.
    (3) When, during any of the inspections as required by
paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this AD, corrosion is found, replace
the affected parts. RRD TAY 650 Engine Manual--E-TAY-3RR, Tasks 72-
52-23-200-000 and 72-52-24-200-000, and RRD TAY 651 Engine Manual--
E-TAY-5RR, Tasks 72-52-23-200-000 and 72-52-24-200-000, contain
guidance on performing the

inspection for corrosion and rejection criteria.

Previous Credit

    (f) Initial inspections done before the effective date of this
AD on LP turbine disks stage 2 and stage 3 listed in Table 1 and
Table 2 of this AD using RRD ASB No. TAY-72-A1524, Revision 1, dated
September 1, 2006, or Revision 2, dated June 13, 2008, comply with
the initial inspection requirements specified in this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (g) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to EASA AD 2010-060R1, dated April 14, 2010, for
related information. Contact Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG,
Eschenweg 11, Dahlwitz, 15827 Blankenfelde-Mahlow, Germany; phone:
011 49 (0) 33-7086-1883; fax: 011 49 (0) 33-7086-3276, for a copy of
the service information referenced in this AD.
    (i) Contact Mark Riley, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, for more information
about this AD.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (j) You must use RRD Alert Service Bulletin No. TAY-72-A1524,
Revision 3, dated March 24, 2010, to do the inspections required by
this AD.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG, Eschenweg 11, Dahlwitz, 15827
Blankenfelde-Mahlow, Germany; phone: 011 49 (0) 33-7086-1883; fax:
011 49 (0) 33-7086-3276.
    (3) You may review copies at the FAA, New England Region, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on August 6, 2010.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-20657 Filed 8-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: August 31, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 168)]
[Notices]
[Page 53289-53292]
[DOCID:fr31au10-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings No. 1

August 24, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC10-84-000.
    Applicants: Black Hills Power, Inc.
    Description: Supplemental Information of Black Hills Power Inc.
    Filed Date: 08/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100823-5188.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 02, 2010.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER05-6-118; EL04-135-120; EL02-111-139; EL03-212-
134.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.;
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Ameren Services Company.
    Description: PJM Transmission Owners Agreement Administrative
Committee submits revisions to PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff.
    Filed Date: 08/19/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100823-0204.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 18, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1196-002.
    Applicants: Lost Creek Wind, LLC.
    Description: Supplement to Notice of Change in Status.
    Filed Date: 08/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100823-5175.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1795-001.
    Applicants: Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc. submits
tariff filing per 35: 2010 Annual Update to be effective 7/16/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/18/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100818-5028.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 08, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2210-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: New York Independent System Operator submits tariff
filing per 35.17(a): Compliance Filing In-City ICAP--Kavanah to be
effective 6/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100823-5172.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2299-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
    Description: Entergy Arkansas, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: Dynamic Transfer Operating Agreement between ESI, Plum
Point, and Osceola to be effective 8/20/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100823-5168.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2300-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: New York Independent System Operator submits tariff
filing per 35: Compliance Filing In-City ICAP--Kavanah to be effective
6/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100823-5173.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2301-000.
    Applicants: New York State Electric & Gas Corporation.
    Description: New York State Electric & Gas Corporation submits its
baseline market-based rate tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised
Volume No 3, to be effective 8/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5000.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2302-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of New Mexico.
    Description: Public Service Company of New Mexico submits its
Market-Based Rates Tariff filing FERC Electric Tariff, Volume No 3, to
be effective 8/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5002.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2303-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Request for Interconnection Queue Waiver Authorization
of Arizona Public Service Company.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5017.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2304-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc et al submits Notice of
Cancellation to First Revised Rate Schedule 184 and Rate Schedules FERC
Nos 311 and 312 with Midwest Energy, Inc.
    Filed Date: 08/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-0202.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2305-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits an executed
interconnection service agreement with AES Armenia Mountain Wind, LLC
et al.
    Filed Date: 08/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-0201.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2306-000.
    Applicants: Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation.
    Description: Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation submits tariff
filing per 35.12: RG&E MBR Baseline eTariff Filing to be effective 8/
23/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5020.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2307-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: New York Independent System Operator submits tariff
filing per 35.12: NYISO Agreements to be effective 8/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5023.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2308-000.
    Applicants: Covanta Delano, Inc.
    Description: Covanta Delano, Inc. submits its baseline market-based
rate tariff filing, FERC Electric Rate Schedule, First Revisd Volume No
1, to be effective 8/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5029.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2309-000.
    Applicants: Elwood Energy, LLC.
    Description: Elwood Energy, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline to be effective 8/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5032.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2310-000.
    Applicants: Covanta Delaware Valley, L.P.
    Description: Covanta Delaware Valley, L.P. submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Covanta Delaware Valley MBR Baseline eTariff Filing to be
effective 8/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5040.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2311-000.
    Applicants: Covanta Essex Company.
    Description: Covanta Essex Company submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Covanta Essex MBR Baseline eTariff Filing to be effective 8/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5041.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2312-000.
    Applicants: Covanta Hempstead Company.
    Description: Covanta Hempstead Company submits tariff filing per
35.12: Covanta Hempstead MBR Baseline eTariff Filing to be effective 8/
24/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5042.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2313-000.
    Applicants: Covanta Maine, LLC.
    Description: Covanta Maine, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Covanta Maine MBR Baseline eTariff Filing to be effective 8/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5043.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2314-000.
    Applicants: Covanta Energy Marketing LLC.
    Description: Covanta Energy Marketing LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Covanta Marketing MBR Baseline eTariff Filing to be effective 8/
24/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5044.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2315-000.
    Applicants: Covanta Niagara, L.P.
    Description: Covanta Niagara, L.P. submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Covanta Niagara MBR Baseline eTariff Filing to be effective 8/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5045.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2316-000.
    Applicants: Covanta Plymouth Renewable Energy Limited Partnership
    Description: Covanta Plymouth Renewable Energy Limited Partnership
submits tariff filing per 35.12: Covanta Plymouth MBR Baseline eTariff
Filing to be effective 8/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5046.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2317-000.
    Applicants: BE CA LLC.
    Description: BE CA LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12: Baseline
eTariff Filing Pursuant to Order No. 714 to be effective 8/25/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5047.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2318-000.

    Applicants: Covanta Power, LLC.
    Description: Covanta Power, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Covanta Power MBR Baseline eTariff Filing to be effective 8/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5048.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2319-000.
    Applicants: BE Alabama LLC.
    Description: BE Alabama LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline eTariff Filing Pursuant to Order No. 714 to be effective 8/25/
2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5049.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2320-000.
    Applicants: BE Allegheny LLC.
    Description: BE Allegheny LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline eTariff Filing Pursuant to Order No. 714 to be effective 8/25/
2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.

    Accession Number: 20100824-5050.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2321-000.
    Applicants: Covanta Union, Inc.
    Description: Covanta Union, Inc. submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Covanta Union MBR Baseline eTariff Filing to be effective 8/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5051.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2322-000.
    Applicants: BE Ironwood LLC.
    Description: BE Ironwood LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline eTariff Filing Pursuant to Order No. 714 to be effective 8/25/
2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5052.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2323-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits Second Revised Sheet
111a et al to Third Revised Rate Schedule FERC No 24 to be effective
10/25/10.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-0208.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2324-000.
    Applicants: BE KJ LLC.
    Description: BE KJ LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12: Baseline
eTariff Filing Pursuant to Order No. 714 to be effective 8/25/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5053.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2325-000.
    Applicants: BE Louisiana LLC.
    Description: BE Louisiana LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline eTariff Filing Pursuant to Order No. 714 to be effective 8/25/
2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5054.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2326-000.
    Applicants: Cedar Brakes I LLC.
    Description: Cedar Brakes I LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline eTariff Filing Pursuant to Order No. 714 to be effective 8/25/
2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5055.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2327-000.
    Applicants: Cedar Brakes II LLC.
    Description: Cedar Brakes II LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline eTariff Filing Pursuant to Order No. 714 to be effective 8/25/
2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5056.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2328-000.
    Applicants: Central Power & Lime LLC.
    Description: Central Power & Lime LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Baseline eTariff Filing Pursuant to Order No. 714 to be
effective 8/25/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5057.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2329-000.
    Applicants: Vineland Energy LLC.
    Description: Vineland Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline eTariff Filing Pursuant to Order No. 714 to be effective 8/25/
2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5058.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2330-000.
    Applicants: Utility Contract Funding, LLC.
    Description: Utility Contract Funding, LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Baseline eTariff Filing Pursuant to Order No. 714 to be
effective 8/25/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5059.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2331-000.
    Applicants: J.P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corporation.
    Description: J.P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corporation submits tariff
filing per 35.12: Baseline eTariff Filing Pursuant to Order No. 714 to
be effective 8/25/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5060.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2332-000.
    Applicants: BE Rayle LLC.
    Description: BE Rayle LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12: Baseline
eTariff Filing Pursuant to Order No. 714 to be effective 8/25/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5061.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2333-000.
    Applicants: Bendwind, LLC.
    Description: Bendwind, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Bendwind, LLC Baseline Filing to be effective 8/25/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5062.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2334-000.
    Applicants: Big Sky Wind, LLC.
    Description: Big Sky Wind, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12: Big
Sky Wind, LLC Baseline Filing to be effective 8/25/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5063.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2335-000.
    Applicants: DeGreeffpa, LLC.
    Description: DeGreeffpa, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
DeGreeffpa, LLC Baseline Filing to be effective 8/25/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5064.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2336-000.
    Applicants: DeGreeff DP, LLC.
    Description: DeGreeff DP, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
DeGreeffpa, DP, LLC Baseline Filing to be effective 8/25/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5065.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    As it relates to any qualifying facility filings, the notices of
self-certification [or self-recertification] listed above, do not
institute a proceeding regarding qualifying facility status. A notice
of self-certification [or self-recertification] simply provides
notification that the entity making the filing has determined the
facility named in the notice meets the applicable criteria to be a
qualifying facility. Intervention and/or protest do not lie in dockets
that are qualifying

facility self-certifications or self-recertifications. Any person
seeking to challenge such qualifying facility status may do so by
filing a motion pursuant to 18 CFR 292.207(d)(iii). Intervention and
protests may be filed in response to notices of qualifying facility
dockets other than self-certifications and self-recertifications.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-21655 Filed 8-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P