                             Supporting Statement
                                      for
                        Information Collection Request

                   Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements
Regarding the Sulfur Content of Motor Vehicle Gasoline, Gasoline Additives, Denatured Fuel Ethanol, and Other Oxygenates
                        under the Tier 3 Proposed Rule
                           40 CFR Part 80, Subpart O

                                EPA ICR 2482.01

                                   May 2013

                   Office of Transportation and Air Quality
                     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1.	IDENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION

	1(a)	Title of the Information Collection

	Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements Regarding the Sulfur Content of Motor Vehicle Gasoline, Gasoline Additives, Denatured Fuel Ethanol and Other Oxygenates under the Tier 3 Proposed Rule; EPA ICR 2482.01.

	1(b)	Short Characterization/Abstract

	The requirements covered under this Information Collection Request (ICR) are included in the proposed Tier 3 rule that will be published in the Federal Register.

	The scope of the recordkeeping and reporting requirements for each type of party in the gasoline distribution system, and therefore the cost to that party, reflects the party's opportunity to create, control or alter the sulfur content of gasoline.  As a result, petroleum refiners and importers have more significant requirements, which are necessary both for their own tracking and that of downstream parties, and for EPA enforcement.  At the same time, parties downstream from the gasoline production or import point, such as distributors and pipelines, have fewer requirements under the proposed rule.

	The recordkeeping and reporting requirements for refiners and importers of motor vehicle gasoline under the proposed Tier 3 program are the same requirements that exist under the Tier 2 sulfur program.  Additionally, the proposed Tier 3 rule contains recordkeeping and reporting requirements that apply to gasoline additive manufacturers and oxygenate manufacturers whose products are blended into finished gasoline or gasoline blendstocks.  The recordkeeping and Product Transfer Document (PTD) requirements for gasoline additive manufacturers would be new but should be minimal since we expect that they are already followed as part of customary business practices.  Finally, there would be new recordkeeping and PTD requirements for producers of denatured fuel ethanol or other oxygenates under the proposed Tier 3 program and new requirements for all downstream parties in the gasoline distribution system to retain PTD information.

	The information under this ICR would be collected by EPA's Compliance Division, within the Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Office of Air and Radiation, and by EPA's Air Enforcement Division, within the Office of Civil Enforcement, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance.  The information collected would be used by EPA to evaluate compliance with the sulfur control requirements under the Tier 3 rule, if finalized.  This oversight by EPA would be necessary to ensure attainment of the air quality goals of the proposed Tier 3 program.  Proprietary information may be submitted by refiners and importers for demonstrating compliance with the sulfur standards.  Confidentiality would be handled in accordance with EPA regulations at 40 CFR Part 2 and established Agency procedures.

	In general terms, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements regarding the sulfur content of gasoline, gasoline additives, denatured fuel ethanol, and other oxygenates under the proposed Tier 3 program consist of the following:

(1)  Sampling and Testing.

Refiners and importers.  Under the proposed Tier 3 rule, refiners and importers would be required to test every batch of gasoline produced or imported for its sulfur content.  Note that refiners and importers are already required to sample and test every batch of the reformulated gasoline  (RFG) they produce under the RFG program.  For the conventional gasoline (CG) portion of a refiner's gasoline production under the proposed Tier 3 rule, batch sampling and testing requirements would just be a continuation of the batch sampling and testing requirements that are in place under the current Tier 2 gasoline sulfur program.  Additionally, denatured fuel ethanol and other oxygenate producers would be required to conduct batch sampling and testing.  Refiners and importers would also conduct quality assurance (QA) periodic sampling and testing for sulfur for defense purposes under the proposed Tier 3 rule.

Blenders of Butane and Other Blendstocks into Previously Certified Gasoline.  Under certain circumstances, blenders who blend butane into previously certified gasoline (PCG) are allowed to comply with the current Tier 2 gasoline sulfur standards based on data from the butane producer/supplier as an alternative to testing every batch testing.  Blenders who blend other blendstocks into PCG are allowed to calculate the sulfur content of the blendstock by testing the PCG before blending and the gasoline produced after blending, and subtracting the volume and sulfur content of the PGC from the volume and sulfur content of the finished blend.  Tier 3 proposes to maintain this practice.

Terminals and Pipelines.  Terminals and pipelines would be required to sample and test gasoline designated as small refiner or small volume refinery gasoline for compliance with the applicable downstream small refiner/small volume refinery standard subsequent to the most recent receipt of gasoline.  Terminals and pipelines also conduct periodic QA testing for sulfur.

Truck Importers.  Under certain circumstances, an importer that imports gasoline by truck is allowed to comply with the sulfur standards based on test records from the foreign terminal.  To use this option, the truck importer would have to conduct QA testing of the gasoline.

(2) Sample Retention.  The proposed Tier 3 rule would require gasoline refiners and importers and producers of denatured fuel ethanol or other oxygenates to retain sample portions from the most recent 20 samples collected or for each sample collected during the most recent 21-day period, whichever is greater, and annually certify that samples have been collected under required procedures.  Refiners and denatured fuel ethanol and other oxygenate producers would be allowed to conduct their own testing rather than having it conducted at an independent laboratory.

(3) Recordkeeping.  The proposed Tier 3 rule includes recordkeeping requirements for any party that produces, imports, sells, offers for sale dispenses, distributes, supplies, offers for supply, stores, or transports gasoline.  Such recordkeeping requirements include PTD information and sulfur sampling and testing information.  Refiners and importers would be required to keep additional information for each batch of gasoline produced or imported.  Additionally, the proposed Tier 3 program includes new PTD requirements that would apply to gasoline additive manufacturers and denatured fuel ethanol and other oxygenate producers.

(4) Reporting.  The proposed Tier 3 rule would require refiners and importers and oxygenate producers and importers to submit an annual report which demonstrates compliance with the applicable sulfur standards and for refiners and importers only any Averaging, Banking, and Trading (ABT) credit activity.1

(5) Attest Requirements.  The proposed Tier 3 rule would require refiners and importers to undergo an annual independent review (called an attest engagement) of the their records which would form the basis for their annual sulfur compliance report.  Attest engagements are required under the RFG program for both RFG and CG.  There would be a small incremental cost associated with including the information required under the proposed Tier 3 sulfur program.

(6) ABT Credit Trading Provisions.  The proposed Tier 3 rule's ABT credit trading provisions would reduce the overall cost of compliance by providing refiners and importers flexibility in complying with the gasoline sulfur standards.  As required under the current Tier 2 program, refiners and importers are would be required to report annually regarding the generation, transfer, and use of credits.

(7) Small refiners/small volume refineries.  Most of this ICR's requirements for small entities are associated with alternate sulfur standards that are designed to lessen the overall burden of compliance for these entities during the phase-in of the program.  Eligible small refiners and small volume refineries who participate in the small refiner program would be required to comply with the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to all refiners.  Small refiners and small volume refineries would be required to identify their gasoline on PTDs.

2.	NEED FOR AND USE OF THE COLLECTION

	2(a)	Need/Authority For The Collection

	 The Tier 3 sulfur requirements are being proposed under the authority granted by Section 211(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).2   Under Section 211(c)(1), EPA may adopt a fuel control if at least one of the following two criteria is met: (1) the emission products of the fuel cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare, or (2) the emission products of the fuel will significantly impair emissions control systems in general use or which would be in general use were the fuel control to be adopted.

	The Tier 3 rule is being proposed based on both of these criteria.  Under the first criterion, EPA believes that emissions products of sulfur in gasoline used in Tier 3 technology vehicles contribute to ozone pollution, air toxics, and PM.  Under the second criterion, EPA believes that sulfur in gasoline that would be used in Tier 3 technology vehicles would significantly impair the emissions control systems of such vehicles.  The Draft Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) submitted with the Tier 3 notice of proposed rulemaking includes a more detailed discussion of EPA's authority to set gasoline sulfur standards, including a discussion of EPA's conclusions related to the factors that must be considered under Section 211(c).

	This supporting statement describes the recordkeeping and reporting requirements and the associated costs to various parties (e.g., refiners, importers, distributors, and retailers of gasoline).  These requirements would be necessary to enable the Administrator to:

	(1) Identify the sources of gasoline, gasoline additives, denatured fuel ethanol, and other oxygenates and gasoline blendstocks; and

	(2) Ensure that these sources comply with the standards and limitations of the proposed Tier 3 rule.

	An effective enforcement scheme is necessary to ensure that the environmental goals of the proposed Tier 3 rule are met, and that those complying with the requirements in good faith are not disadvantaged by non-complying parties.  The proposed Tier 3 rule's requirements create a significant economic incentive for noncompliance.  Without the accompanying recordkeeping and reporting requirements, Congressional intent to improve air quality through the proposed Tier 3 program would be thwarted because neither EPA nor industry would have sufficient information to monitor compliance.  Non-complying gasoline, gasoline additives, denatured fuel ethanol, and other oxygenates would likely be introduced into commerce on a widespread basis but for requirements that make it possible for EPA to cross-check records of various entities in order to determine compliance.

	Sections 114 and 208 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7414 and 7542, authorize EPA to require recordkeeping and reporting regarding enforcement of the provisions of Title II of the CAA.  The current regulations applicable to motor vehicle gasoline, including the regulations associated with this information collection, can be found in 40 CFR Part 80, Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives.

	2(b)	Practical Utility/Users of the Data

	EPA proposes to use the information and test results (e.g., sulfur content and volume of each batch of gasoline) contained in the annual reports that would be required by this information collection to evaluate the compliance of parties involved in the production and importation of gasoline, gasoline additives, denatured fuel ethanol, and other oxygenates with the proposed sulfur control requirements.  These reports would also be used by EPA to target compliance investigations.  PTDs maintained by parties in the gasoline distribution system and records related to gasoline blending would be used to evaluate the compliance of parties that maintain the records, and to help evaluate upstream compliance.

3.	NONDUPLICATION, CONSULTATIONS, AND OTHER COLLECTION CRITERIA

	3(a)	Non-duplication

	Efforts have been made to eliminate duplication in this information collection.  Provisions included in the proposed Tier 3 sulfur rule would allow parties to consolidate reporting requirements and/or provide abbreviated reports where appropriate.  For example, to reduce the reporting burden, reports specific to compliance with the sulfur standards and reports related to the sulfur ABT credit trading program are included in the annual reports already required to be submitted under the RFG program.  Where possible, information requirements from various organizations within the Agency have been combined to minimize the submittal of duplicate information in different formats.  The information in this collection is not available from another source.

	To minimize the information collection burden, refiners and importers who are already registered with the Agency would not have to register again under the proposed Tier 3 rule.

	Additionally, since California's state gasoline sulfur requirements are as stringent as those under the Tier 3 sulfur program for most of the remainder of the nation's gasoline, and since California has its own compliance and enforcement provisions, California gasoline is exempt from most of the requirements of the sulfur program.

	3(b)	Public Notice Prior to Submission to OMB

	EPA will submit the ICR to OMB for review, along with the notice of proposed rulemaking.  This proposed supporting statement is being docketed in order to permit interested parties to fully comment on it.

	3(c)	Consultations

      The regulations, including the cost analysis that is reflected in this ICR, were developed based on experience with similar regulations developed in the past in close consultation with the affected industry.  Collaboration with industry and other stakeholders has been a key element in developing the agencies' rules.  Throughout the development of this proposal, EPA met extensively with individual refiners, industry trade associations, and other stakeholders. Their comments have been reflected in the burden estimates discussed below.

3(d)	Effect of Less Frequent Collection

	The proposed Tier 3 sulfur program would require gasoline refiners and importers and oxygenate producers and importers to submit annual reports which demonstrate compliance with the applicable sulfur standards by the information contained within.  The information contained in such reports would include information regarding the sulfur content and volume of a refinery's or importer's gasoline or denatured fuel ethanol or other oxygenate.  Less frequent submittal of such reports would severely hinder EPA's ability to monitor compliance, and would likely lead to noncompliance.  Additionally, requiring less than every-batch sampling and testing, where applicable, would  make the sulfur cap requirement (i.e., the per gallon maximum sulfur content) meaningless, and would likely lead to extreme excursions in fuel sulfur content which could affect emission control systems and lead to increased emissions.  This would be an unacceptable outcome given that the proposed Tier 3 sulfur program is intended to lead to reduced emissions in part by compatible vehicle and fuel interaction.

	3(e)	General Guidelines

	This information collection activity complies with 5 CFR 1320.6, except that respondents would be required to keep certain records for longer than three years.  Specifically, all parties would be required to keep PTDs and records of quality assurance programs for five years, and refiners and importers as well as denatured fuel ethanol and other oxygenate producers and importers would be required to keep their compliance records for five years.  Records related to the ABT credit trading program would also be required to be retained for five years.  The information required to be retained will facilitate EPA's identification of the source of any gasoline found to be in violation of the sulfur standard.  Much of the information required under the proposed Tier 3 rule is already required under the current Tier 2 program, and most records are required to be kept for five years under the Tier 2 program.  Therefore, the recordkeeping requirements under the proposed Tier 3 rule impose little additional burden.  Five years is the applicable statute of limitations for the Tier 2 gasoline sulfur and other fuel programs.  See 28 U.S.C. 2462.

	Refiners and importers submit a limited amount of proprietary information, such as batch volume and sulfur content in their annual reports.  EPA believes that requiring annual reports provides an appropriate and effective means of monitoring compliance with the standards under the sulfur program.  This type of information has been collected in the past and would be safeguarded in the same manner as data required by other EPA directives.  Pertinent information, whether kept by the respondent or by a contractor, is subject to auditing by EPA.  Consequently, EPA officials will require voluntary entry and access to facilities.

	3(f)	Confidentiality

	As discussed in 3(e) above, proprietary information may submitted by refiners and importers for demonstrating compliance with the sulfur standards.  Such information is protected in accordance with the EPA regulations at 40 CFR Part 2 and established Agency procedures.

3(g)	Sensitive Questions

	No questions of a sensitive nature are asked in this information collection.

4.	THE RESPONDENTS AND THE INFORMATION COLLECTED

	4(a)	Respondents/SIC Codes

	The respondents to this information collection would be:
      -	Refiners (both domestic and foreign refiners who manufacture gasoline for use in the U.S.)
      -	Importers of gasoline into the U. S.
      -	Gasoline distributors, carriers, wholesale purchaser-consumers, and retailers
      -	Users of research and development gasoline (testing laboratories)

Table 4(a).1: Respondent Industry Classification Codes

Category
                                 NAICS[1] Code
SIC[2] Code
Examples of Potentially Affected Entities
Industry
                                    324110
2911
Petroleum refineries (including importers)
Industry
                                    325110
2869
Butane manufacturers
Industry
                                    325193
2869
Ethyl alcohol manufacturing
Industry
                                    211112
1321
Natural gas liquids extraction and fractionation
Industry
                                    325199
2869
Other basic organic chemical manufacturing
Industry
                                    486910
4613
Natural gas liquids pipelines, refined petroleum products pipelines.
Industry
                                    424690
5169
Chemical and allied products merchant wholesalers
Industry
                                    325199
2869
Manufacturers of gasoline additives
Industry
                                    424710
5171
Petroleum bulk stations and terminals.  E51-83 manufacturers.
Industry
                                    493190
4226
Other warehousing and storage- bulk petroleum storage
Gasoline Retailers and
Wholesale Purchaser-Consumers
                                     44711
                                     44719
5541
< 6.5 million dollars
Testing Laboratories
                                     54138
8734
< 5 million dollars
1) North American Industry Classification System
2) Standard Industrial Classification system

      4(b)	Information Requested

	The recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the regulated parties vary depending on their position in the gasoline production, blending and distribution stream and their potential to influence the sulfur content of gasoline.  The regulated parties are divided into groups (and sub-groups) as indicated in the list below, based on the applicable recordkeeping and reporting requirements.

-	Gasoline refiners and importers
      -	Additional and/or alternative requirements exist if:
            -	Refiner qualifies and opts to use the small-refiner provisions
            -	Refiner or importer participates in the ABT credit trading program
		-	Refiner (including parties who blend gasoline at a terminal facility) produces gasoline by blending butane or other blendstocks into previously certified gasoline
-	Gasoline distributors (gasoline terminals, pipelines, and truckers)
      -	Additional requirements exist for distributors of gasoline subject to the small refiner and small volume refinery standards.
-	Gasoline retailers and wholesale purchaser-consumers (WPC)
      -	Additional requirements exist for retailers and WPCs of exempted research and development (R&D) gasoline
-	Users of R&D gasoline (testing laboratories)
-	Denatured fuel ethanol and other oxygenate producers and importers
-	Gasoline additive manufacturers

	(i)	Data items, including recordkeeping requirements

	The information collection requirements are categorized in the following lists according to which regulated parties they apply.  Certain requirements, such as the PTD requirements, would be broadly applicable to most parties who transfer gasoline.  These more generally applicable requirements are discussed separately from the requirements that apply only to specific groups of regulated parties.  Additional and/or alternative requirements applicable to subgroups of respondents are also discussed separately.  Where a regulated party is not specifically mentioned, only the most broadly applicable requirements apply.

	The presence of an "*" in the following list of requirements indicates an explanatory note regarding the applicability of these requirements.

      (A)	Broadly-Applicable Requirements

 	The following requirements apply broadly to all of the regulated parties listed above.  The responsibilities of gasoline distributors (gasoline terminals, pipelines, and carriers) and gasoline retailers and WPCs are primarily related to compliance with the following broadly applicable requirements.  Some terminal or other facility operators blend butane or other blendstocks into previously certified gasoline.  These gasoline producers are considered refiners under the sulfur program, and are discussed under the requirements for refiners.  Unless specifically noted, the PTD requirements listed below do not result in any new activities for gasoline distributors, retailers, and WPCs.

 -  The proposed Tier 3 rule would require persons who manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale,  dispense, distribute, supply, offer for supply, store, or transport gasoline to include the following information in PTDs that accompany each transfer of gasoline:
       -	PTDs that accompany the transfer of gasoline manufactured by small refiners and small volume refineries and designated as small refiner/small volume refinery gasoline are required to identify the gasoline as small refiner/small volume refinery gasoline and designate the applicable downstream cap.

       * The small refiner and small volume refinery provisions would allow the production of a special classification of gasoline which would be allowed to continue meeting the Tier 2 sulfur standards through December 31, 2019.  The presence of this special classification of gasoline in the distribution system necessitates the inclusion of additional information on gasoline PTDs.  Beginning January 1, 202020, small refiner and small volume refinery gasoline would be subject to the Tier 3 sulfur standards applicable to all other refiners and refineries and the additional PTD requirements would no longer be applicable.  Small refiners and small volume refineries would experience an additional burden associated with adding the required information to the PTDs but downstream parties in the gasoline distribution chain would not be required to undertake any new activities due to the additional information on the PTDs.

       Except for transfers to truck carriers, retailers and wholesale purchaser-consumers, product codes can be used on PTDs to convey the required information if such codes are clearly understood by each transferee.  This allowance lessens the burden of compliance and is consistent with the requirements under the current Tier 2 gasoline sulfur program.

 -	Under the proposed Tier 3 rule, any party that would be required to conduct sampling and testing for sulfur content would be required to retain records regarding:
       -	The location, date, time, tank or storage tank identification for each sample collected
       -	The name and title of the person who collected the sample and the person who performed the testing
       -	The results of the test as originally printed or recorded, and any record which contains a result that is not identical to the originally printed or recorded test

 -	For purposes of establishing an affirmative defense to a violation, parties other than retailers or wholesale purchaser-consumers would be required to provide business records documenting the following:
 	-	A periodic sampling and testing program designed to ensure that the gasoline meets the applicable sulfur standard
 	-	On each occasion that the gasoline is found not to be in compliance with the applicable sulfur standard, the actions taken to stop the sale or distribution of any gasoline found not to be in compliance, and the actions taken to remedy the violation and the factors that caused the violation (such as removing the non-complying gasoline from the distribution system and taking steps to prevent future violations)

 -	Records would be required to be maintained for five years from the date they were create with one exception.  Records related to ABT credits would be required to be kept for five years from the date of generation, except where credits are transferred.  In such cases, records would be required to be kept by the transferor for five years from the date of transfer, and by the transferee for five years from the date of transfer, use or termination, whichever is later.  As a result, in certain circumstances, records related to credits may be required to be maintained for longer than five years from the date of origination.  This potentially longer retention time is necessary to enable the Agency to determine the legitimacy of credit transfers in the context of an enforcement action

       * In most cases, this requirement does not impose an additional burden because the required records are already maintained under other 40 CFR Part 80 fuels programs, or the records are maintained as a customary business practice.

 	(B)		Requirements Specific to Gasoline Refiners and Importers:

 	The following requirements apply to all refiners and importers:

 -	Register with EPA six months prior to producing or importing gasoline meeting the proposed Tier 3 standards and/or participating in the credit program.

       *One-time requirement.  Registration under other 40 CFR Part 80 fuel programs is sufficient to satisfy this requirement.  As a result, no additional burden is expected under the proposed Tier 3 rule.

 -	Calculate the annual average sulfur level for each refinery or all imported gasoline.

 -	Submit annual sulfur averaging report to EPA for each refinery and importer by March 31 for the previous year's averaging period.

 -	Include the following information in the refinery's or importer's annual average report:
 	-	EPA refiner and refinery facility, or importer registration numbers
 	-	Applicable annual average standard
 	-	Total volume of gasoline produced at the refinery or imported
 	-	Annual average gasoline sulfur content produced at the refinery or imported
 	-	Annual average sulfur level after inclusion of any credits
 	-	For each batch of gasoline produced or imported during the averaging period, the assigned batch number, the date the batch was produced, and the volume and sulfur content of the batch.

 -	Arrange to have an attest engagement report submitted to EPA by May 31for the previous year's annual averaging period
 	-	The attest engagement would be required to be performed on the underlying documentation that forms the basis of any required report
 	-	The attest engagement would be required to be prepared in accordance with established procedures
 	-	The attest engagement would be required to be performed by an independent certified public accountant (CPA)
 	-	Internal auditors may assist the CPA pursuant to the Standards for Attestation Engagements

 	(C)		Additional and/or Alternate Requirements for Refiners and Importers that        Participate in the ABT Credit Trading Program

 	The following recordkeeping and reporting requirements apply to refiners and importers who utilize the ABT credit trading provisions under the sulfur program:

 -	Calculate ABT credits generated

 -	Include in the refinery or importer annual sulfur compliance report (in addition to the information required for all refiners and importers) the number of credits:
       -	Carried over from the prior averaging period
 	-	Generated
 	-	Used
 	-	Obtained from or transferred to another party, and the name and EPA refiner or importer registration number of the other party to the transaction
 	-	Expired at the end of the averaging period
 	-	Carried over to the subsequent averaging period

 -	Retain the following records (in addition to records required to be kept by all refiners and importers), separately by year of creation and pertaining to the number of credits:
 	-	Carried over from the prior averaging period
 	-	Generated
 	-	Used
 	-	Obtained from or transferred to another party, and the name and EPA registration number of the other party to the transaction
 	-	Expired at the end of the averaging period

 -	Retain records related to credits for five years from the date of generation; if transferred, the transferor must retain records for five years from the date of transfer and the transferee must retain records for five years from the date of transfer, use or termination, whichever is later

       * As discussed above, these requirements could result in records being required to be retained for longer than five years in some cases.

 	(D)		Alternative Requirements for Importers who Import Gasoline by Truck

 - 	Importers who import gasoline into the U. S. by truck may use the test results from the foreign terminal to satisfy the sampling and testing requirements that are otherwise required if the importer fulfills the following alternative requirements:

       -	Obtain records from the foreign terminal at which the gasoline was loaded for importation into the U.S. which shows the sulfur content of each truck load of gasoline imported into the U.S.
       -	Conduct a QA program for each truck loading terminal.  QA samples would be required to be taken from the truck-loading terminal for testing by the importer, or as an alternative, by an independent laboratory, to determine the sulfur content.  The sampling and testing would be required to be performed using the regulatory methods.  The frequency of the sampling and testing would be required to be at least one sample for each fifty of an importer's trucks that are loaded at the terminal, or one sample per month, whichever is more frequent.
       -	Treat each truck load of imported gasoline as a separate batch for purposes of assigning batch numbers, maintaining records, and reporting

       * These requirements only apply if the importer elects to use this alternative way of       demonstrating compliance.

 -	For a truck importer to use the alternative sampling and testing procedures, the foreign terminal must agree to fulfill the following requirements:

 	-	Sample and test the gasoline contained in the storage tank from which the trucks used to transport gasoline are loaded, to demonstrate that a sulfur content does not exceed the applicable per-gallon standard.  This sampling and testing would be required to be performed after each receipt of gasoline into the storage tank, or immediately before each transfer of gasoline into the importer's truck.

       * These requirements apply only if the importer elects to use the alternative procedures to demonstrate compliance with the every batch sampling and testing requirement.  These additional requirements are not applicable if the importer has an independent third party conduct the required testing at the foreign terminal facility.  This is generally the case because of the cost savings that result for the importer as well as the foreign terminal operator.  Terminal testing conducted by a third party satisfies the testing requirements that are otherwise applicable to the importer.  Therefore, EPA expects that these requirements will not result in additional activities for foreign terminal operators.

 	(E)		Alternative Requirements for Refiners, Pipelines, and Terminals that Produce       Gasoline by Blending Butane or Other Blendstocks into Previously Certified       Gasoline (PCG)

 -	As an alternative to the every batch sampling and testing requirements, refiner-blenders who blend butane into PCG may meet the sampling and testing requirements by using sulfur test results from the butane supplier provided that the refiner-blender:
       -	Obtains a copy of the test results from the butane supplier which shows that the sulfur content of each load of butane in the storage tank from which the blendstock was drawn does not exceed the applicable per-gallon standard and that the tests were performed using the regulatory method
       -	Treats the butane as a batch (re: sulfur content and volume) for the purpose of calculating compliance with the applicable sulfur averaging standard
       -	Conducts a quality assurance program including sampling and testing from each butane supplier to demonstrate that butane sulfur content is below the applicable per-gallon standard.  The frequency of butane sampling and testing from each supplier would be required to be one sample for every 500,000 gallons of butane received, or one sample every 3 months, which ever results in more frequent sampling

 -	As an alternative to the every batch sampling testing requirements, refiner-blenders who blend other blendstocks into PCG may:
 	-	Sample and test the PCG for sulfur content prior to blending and subsequent to blending and calculate the volume and sulfur content of the blendstock by subtracting the volume and sulfur content of the PCG from the volume and sulfur content of the gasoline subsequent to blending, or
 	-	If every batch of blendstock used during an averaging period has a sulfur content that is equal to or less then the applicable per-gallon standard, sample and test each batch of blendstock for volume and sulfur content when received and treat each blendstock receipt as a separate batch for purposes of compliance calculations

 	(F)	    Requirements for Pipelines and Terminals

 	Pipelines and terminals that receive small refiner/small volume refinery gasoline must:

 -	Fulfill testing requirements to assure that gasoline designated as small refiner/small volume refinery gasoline has the applicable sulfur content to qualify as small refiner/small volume refinery gasoline.

 	(G)		Requirements for Gasoline Retailers and Wholesale Purchaser-Consumers:

 -	If research and development (R&D) gasoline is to be stored by a retailer or wholesale purchaser-consumer (WPC), records would be required to be kept to demonstrate that the retailer or WPC is associated with the facility that would be using the R&D gasoline.  Documents associated with R&D gasoline are required to be retained for five years.

 	(H)		Requirements for Users of R&D Gasoline.

 	Users of R&D gasoline must submit an application to EPA prior to initial use of the R&D gasoline.  The application must contain the following:
       -	Statement of purpose
 	-	Description of the R& D program, including the sulfur level of the gasoline expected to be used
       -	Expected start and completion dates of the R&D program
       -	Estimation of the number of vehicles or engines in which the fuel would be used and mileage to be accumulated
       -	Locations where gasoline would be stored and used
       -	Volume of gasoline to be used.
       -	Identification of the gasoline distributor or other source of the R&D gasoline
       -	Explanation of why sulfur-compliant gasoline cannot be used
 	-	Provisions to ensure EPA monitoring capability

       * A report would be required to be submitted to obtain an exemption for R&D gasoline under EPA's proposed Tier 3 rule.   The application under the Tier 3 sulfur program may be combined with the report already submitted to gain an exemption under other 40 CFR Part 80 fuel programs.  Therefore, the R&D gasoline exemption application under the proposed Tier 3 sulfur program would not result in additional reports/applications being submitted to EPA.

 -	R&D gasoline would be required to be identified on PTDs as gasoline to be used only for this purpose

       * This requirement already exists to establish an exemption from EPA's Tier 2 program; hence this PTD requirement should not result in a new activity.

      (I) 	Requirements for Gasoline Additive Manufacturers

-	PTDs that state the maximum registered concentration for the additive and the corresponding maximum allowed treatment rate.

 	(J)		Requirements for Denatured Fuel Ethanol and Other Oxygenate Producers.

 -	PTDs with the applicable statement for either denatured fuel ethanol or oxygenates other than denatured fuel ethanol.

 	(ii)	Respondent Activities

 	As noted above, much of the information needed for compliance with the recordkeeping requirements under the proposed Tier 3 rule is already being retained either to comply with the requirements of other 40 CFR Part 80 fuel programs or as a customary business practice.  To the extent possible, EPA has ensured that information collected and reported under other 40 CFR Part 80 fuel programs such as the RFG program can also be used to demonstrate compliance with the proposed Tier 3 sulfur program without necessitating additional activities by the regulated parties.  Only in cases where it is essential to ensure the realization of the projected benefits of the sulfur program, is EPA requiring additional testing, recordkeeping, and reporting.

 	The activities arising out of the testing, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements outlined in the preceding section are listed below according to the respondent class to which they apply.  Activities that apply to a broad class of respondents (such as refiners and importers) are also applicable to respondent subclasses (such as small refiners) unless otherwise noted.

 	The burdens and costs included in this ICR are those which are expected to be incurred during the next three years, the period of time covered by this ICR.

 	The following lists detail the activities of the various regulated parties:

 	(A)      Activities of Gasoline Refiners and Importers

 -	Test each batch of gasoline for its sulfur content, retain samples from the most recent 20 samples collected or for each sample collected during the most recent 21 day period, whichever is greater, and retain records of the testing for five years.

 	-	Conduct a QA periodic sampling and testing program for sulfur content for defense purposes.

 -	Calculate the average annual sulfur level of each refinery, or all imported gasoline, using batch test reports.

 -	Submit refinery and importer annual averaging reports to EPA by the March 31 of the year following the prior year's averaging period.

 -	Arrange to have an independent third party submit to EPA an attest engagement report by May 31 of each year for the prior calendar year averaging period.

 	(B)      Activities of Gasoline Refiners That Utilize the Small Refiner Provisions:

 -	For transfers of gasoline with a small refiner designation, identify the gasoline as small refiner/small volume refinery gasoline and indicate the downstream small refiner sulfur standard on PTDs.

 -	Notify EPA if refiner wishes to withdrawal small refiner status.  Upon notice to EPA, effective on January 1 of the year following such notification, the small refiner will become subject to the sulfur standards for all other non-small refiners.

 	(C)		Activities of Refiners and Importers Who are Exempt from Requirements for Extreme Hardship

 -	Submit annual sulfur averaging reports to EPA under the terms of the hardship application.

       (D)		Activities of Refiners and Importers Who Participate in the ABT Credit Trading Program

 -	Include in the annual sulfur averaging report to EPA.
 		-	The credits carried over from prior averaging period, generated, used, terminated, transferred or carried over to the next averaging period.
          -	The identity of the refiners/refineries and importers (including EPA registration numbers) involved in credit transactions.

 -	Retain records related to ABT credit activity.

       *These activities are required only if a refiner or importer elects to participate in the ABT credit trading program.

 	(E)      Alternate Activities for Importers that Import Gasoline by Truck

 -	Use the following alternative requirements to satisfy the requirement to sample and test every batch of gasoline:

 	-	Obtain test results from the foreign terminal at which the gasoline was loaded which shows the sulfur content of each truck load of gasoline imported into the U.S.
       -	Satisfy the program requirement for each truck loading terminal

       *Samples from the truck-loading terminal may be taken for testing either by the importer or an independent third party.  The frequency of the sampling and testing would be required to be at least one sample for each 50of an importer's trucks that are loaded at the terminal, or one sample per month, whichever is more frequent.

       * These alternative requirements only apply if the importer elects to use this alternative way of demonstrating compliance.

 	(F)		Alternative Activities for Refiners, Terminals, and Pipelines That Produce Gasoline by Blending Butane or Other Blendstocks into Previously Certified Gasoline

 -	For butane blenders, use the test results from the butane supplier to satisfy the requirement to sample and test each batch of gasoline provided that:

       -	The butane blender obtains a copy of the test results from the butane supplier which shows that the butane in the storage tank from which the butane was drawn does not exceed the applicable per-gallon standard.
       -	The butane is treated as a batch regarding sulfur content and volume for the purpose of calculating compliance with the applicable sulfur averaging standard.
       -	The refiner conducts a QA program including sampling and testing from each butane supplier to demonstrate that butane sulfur content does not exceed the applicable per-gallon standard.  The frequency of butane sampling and testing from each supplier would be required to be one sample for every 500,000 gallons of butane received, or one sample every 3 months, which ever results in more frequent sampling.

 -	For blenders who blend other blendstocks into PCG, calculate the volume and sulfur content of the blendstock by subtracting the volume and sulfur content of the PCG from the volume and sulfur content of the finished blend, or
 	-	If every batch of blendstock used during the averaging period has a sulfur content that is equal to, or less than, the applicable per-gallon cap standard, sample and test each batch of blendstock received and treat each receipt as a separate batch for purposes of compliance calculations

 	(G)		Activities of Pipelines and Terminals

 -	Conduct sampling and testing of gasoline designated as small refiner/small volume refinery gasoline.
 -	Conduct periodic QA assurance testing for sulfur content for defense purposes.

 	(H)		Activities of Users of Research and Development Gasoline:

 -	Prior to initial use of R&D gasoline, submit an application to EPA
       * As discussed above, the application for an R&D exemption under the proposed Tier 3 rule may be combined with the report already submitted to gain exemptions under other 40 CFR Part 80 fuel programs. This requirement, therefore, is not expected to result in additional reports or applications being submitted to EPA.

       (I)      Activities of Distributors, Retailers, and WPCs

 -	WPCs identify and keep records of any R&D gasoline.

 	*As discussed above, this activity should not result in any additional burden since the documents are kept as a customary business practice.

      (I) 	Requirements for Gasoline Additive Manufacturers

 -	Maintain records of its additive production quality control activities and make records available upon request.

 	(J)		Requirements for Denatured Fuel Ethanol and Other Oxygenate Producers.

 -	Test each batch of denatured fuel ethanol or other oxygenate for its sulfur content, retain samples from the most recent 20 samples collected or for each sample collected during the most recent 21 day period, whichever is greater, and retain records of the testing for five years.

 -	Conduct a QA periodic sampling and testing program for sulfur content for defense purposes.

 -	Calculate the average annual sulfur level using batch test reports.

 -	Submit annual averaging reports to EPA by March 31 of the year following the prior year's averaging period.

5. THE INFORMATION COLLECTED--AGENCY ACTIVITIES, COLLECTION METHODOLOGY, AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

 	5(a)	Agency Activities

 	Agency activities associated with the annual reporting requirements of this information collection consist of the following:

       1) Review submitted reports (includes associated Agency inspections and investigations);
       2) Enter data from the reports into the database;
       3) Analyze requests for confidentiality and provide appropriate protection;
       4) Store the data and archive according to a record retention schedule conforming to EPA policy.

 	Agency activities associated with the attest engagement requirements of this information collection consist of the following:

       1) Review submitted reports (includes associated Agency inspections and investigations);
       2) Store the data and archive according to a record retention schedule conforming to EPA policy.

 	5(b)	Collection Methodology and Management

 	The collection methodology and management of the information collected is similar to the process used for other 40 CFR Part 80 fuel programs.  The information should be reported electronically via a format specified by the Administrator.
 	When the submittal is received, EPA would review it for completeness EPA may also review respondents' records as a part of its enforcement effort to ensure the accuracy and validity of the data submitted.  Non-confidential data would be made available to the public upon request.

 	5(c)	Small Refiner/Small Volume Refinery and Temporary Relief Flexibilities

 	As discussed in Section 3(c) above, as part of its effort to comply with the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) requirements, EPA met several times with small entity representatives.  Additionally, EPA convened an intergovernmental panel, in accordance with the SBREFA, which also met with small entity representatives and which then made specific recommendations to EPA regarding the impact of sulfur control on small businesses.  A copy of the panel's report is available in the docket for this regulatory action.  The report contains a list of the fuel industry's participating small entity representatives, and provides a summary of their comments.

 	The panel's recommendations were carefully considered by EPA in developing the proposed Tier 3 rule and the specific provisions for small refiners.  The panel did not recommend a wholesale exemption for small refiners and small volume refineries, but rather that they be provided additional time to comply.  As a result, the gasoline sulfur rule provides for less stringent sulfur standards for qualifying small refiners until 2020

 	In addition, the gasoline sulfur rule provided temporary relief from the sulfur requirements for refiners who demonstrated that extreme hardship would result in the absence of such relief.

 	A Draft Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) which further discusses the measures taken to minimize the impact on small business entities is included in the docket for the gasoline sulfur rulemaking.

 	5(d)	Collection Schedule

 The collection schedule of the sulfur program reporting requirements is shown in Table 5(d).

 Table 5(d). Collection Schedule

 Item
 Due Date
 Refinery and importer annual averaging reports, including ABT information
 March 31 following the previous year's averaging period
 Attest reports
 May 31 following the previous year's averaging period

 6.	ESTIMATING THE ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST OF THE COLLECTION

 	6(a)	Estimating Respondent Burden

 	The estimated hourly burdens for this ICR are contained in Tables 6(a)1 and 6(a)2.  The accounting assumptions made in making the estimates of annual hourly burden and cost are summarized after the following tables on respondent hourly burdens.

     Table 6(a)1: Annual Hourly Burden for Gasoline Refiners and Importers
            and Denatured Fuel Ethanol and Other Oxygenate Producers

 *This estimate is based on an average of 3 refineries per refiner.  In reality, larger refiners may own several refineries, while smaller refiners may own only one refinery.

      Table 6(a)2: Annual Hourly Burden for Gasoline Terminals, Pipelines
            and Users of Research and Development (R&D) Gasoline

                              Collection  Activity
                       Annual Burden Hours per Respondent
                  Number of Responses per Respondent per Year
                                  Total Annual
                                  Burden Hours
                                (per Respondent)

                                   Managerial
                                   Technical
                                    Clerical
                                   Contractor
                                   Equivalent
                             ($40/hr - field test)

 Sampling and Testing
 for small refiner/small volume refinery gasoline
     Terminals
     Pipelines
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                      1.0
                                      1.0
                                       2
                                       2
                                      2.0
                                      2.0
 Q/A Periodic Sampling
 and Testing for Defense
     Terminals
     Pipelines
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                      1.0
                                      1.0
                                       10
                                       10
                                       10
                                       10
 R&D Applications
                                       0
                                       0
                                      0.5
                                       0
                                       1
                                      0.5

 Accounting Assumptions:

 	The discussion of the requirements under the sulfur program (Section 4(b)(i)) contains notes on the extent to which these requirements could be satisfied without necessitating additional activities by using information that is already collected and submitted to EPA under other 40 CFR Part 80 fuel programs.  This discussion helps to support the selection of the activities that were newly required under the sulfur rule (Section 4(b)(ii)), the selection of the respondent classes (Section 6(a)), and the following accounting assumptions.

 	Accounting Assumptions that Pertain to Labor Costs:

 1)	The cost of managerial time is $110/hour.

 2)	The cost of technical time is $96/hour.

 3)	The cost of clerical time is $37/hour.

 	 An hourly equivalent rate of $74 was assumed for dependent laboratory testing and
              $40 for field testing for sulfur.

 	Accounting Assumptions that Pertain to Activities:

 These costs are similar to those used in other 40 CFR Part 80 fuel program ICRs, and are based upon Bureau of Labor Statistics figures from "Employer Costs for Employee Compensation  -  Table 12  -  Private Industry, Manufacturing and Non-Manufacturing Industries by Occupational Group (December 2003).

 The following assumptions were made in estimating the burden to refiners and importers and denatured fuel ethanol and other oxygenate producers of submitting averaging reports to EPA:
      -  	There are currently about 80 refiners and 39 importers of gasoline.  There are 144 operable refineries (including 10 idle) as of January 1, 2012, 111 of which produce gasoline.
      -	There are approximately 105 ethanol producers covering 233 domestic ethanol producing facilities registered with EPA and another 40 companies that are registered to import ethanol.
 	-	Preparing the report in the proper format and submitting it to EPA will require 0.75 hour of a clerical employee's time and 0.25 hour of a manager's time.
       -  	Reporting associated with ABT credit and/or allotment activity is estimated to be 0.25 hour of managerial time, 0.25 technical time, and 0.25 clerical time.

 2)	The following assumptions were used to estimate the additional burden for refiners and importers associated with testing the sulfur content of each batch of CG rather than testing composite samples and to estimate the burden for denatured fuel ethanol and other oxygenate producers to test the sulfur content of each batch of oxygenate.
 	-	There are approximately 75 domestic refiners that produce CG and 30 importers that import CG
       -	The number of additional sulfur tests required on batches of CG would be approximately 400 for each refiner and 27 for each importer.  We also assume  400 tests for denatured fuel ethanol and other oxygenate producers.
       -	2/3 of refiners will perform their own sulfur testing; 1/3 will have the testing done by an independent third party laboratory
       -	Importers will have testing done by an independent third party laboratory
 	-	A sulfur test conducted at a private laboratory will cost a refiner or importer $50 for the test itself, plus $24 for the transportation of the sample to the lab and to perform other administrative functions, for a total cost of $74/test (this assumes that the cost of the employee to transport the sample and handle the associated administrative duties is $24/hour, and it takes one hour to perform the task)
       -	An annual cost of the additional testing of gasoline sulfur content for refiners who conduct their own testing was calculated using the following assumptions:
       -	The hourly burden associated with batch reports for the additional testing for sulfur is 0.10 hour for managerial time, 0.70  hour for technical time, and 0.20 hour for clerical time. Since the average CG refiner will need to test 400 additional batches, the hourly burden for this additional testing is 400 hours.
 	-	The annual cost of the additional testing of gasoline sulfur content for refiners and importers who use an independent third party laboratory was estimated using the following assumptions:
          -	Since the average CG refiner will need to test 400 additional batches, and the cost of a test conducted at a private laboratory is $74 per test, the annual cost of the additional testing for those refiners that use a private laboratory is $29,600/year
          -	Since the average importer will need to test 27 additional batches of CG per year, and the cost of a test conducted at a private laboratory is $74 per test, the annual cost of the testing for such parties is $1,998/year
          -	There are no additional costs associated with storing the CG batch samples for 30 days beyond those considered above

 3)	The following assumptions were made in estimating the burden that would result from the use of the alternate provisions to satisfy the CG batch test requirement by refiners that blend blendstocks (other than butane) into previously certified gasoline:
          -	These alternate provisions would be used to the fullest extent possible by all refiners who blend blendstocks into previously certified gasoline, since their use will result in a significant savings in the overall cost of compliance
       -	The refiner already tests each blendstock upon receipt to determine its sulfur content in order to comply with the requirements of the RFG program or as a customary business practice
       -	15 refiners blend blendstocks other than butane into CG  -  on average, each of these refiners produces 40 batches of gasoline by blendstock addition
       -	The costs related to the use of this alternate provision would be related to performing calculations using existing data and of keeping records regarding compliance  -  these tasks could be accomplished using 0.5 hour of technical time and 0.50 hour of clerical time

 4)	The following assumptions were made in estimating the burden associated with the use of the alternate provisions to satisfy the CG batch test requirement by refiners who blend butane into previously certified gasoline:
       -	Due to gasoline volatility requirements, butane is blended only during the winter season (from September 16 through February 28)
       -	Refiner/blenders at eight terminals, eight pipelines, and four refiners blend butane into previously-certified gasoline during the winter season.
       -	On average, each blender blends butane into five batches of gasoline during the winter season
       -	On average, each blender is supplied butane by two suppliers
       -	All tests would be conducted by an independent laboratory at a cost of $74 per test
       -	The administrative duties associated with the alternative requirements could be accomplished using 0.50 hour of clerical time, and 0.25 hour of technical time

 5)	The following additional assumptions were made in estimating the burden to refiners of participating in the small refiner/small volume refinery program:
       -	Administrative duties associated with recording, maintaining, and reporting the information required during the participation in the small refiner program (such as on the annual sulfur averaging report) could be accomplished with an additional 0.50 hour clerical time

 6)	The following additional assumptions were made in estimating the burden to refiners who are granted temporary hardship relief:
 	-	Administrative duties associated with recording, maintaining, and reporting the information required during the period of temporary relief (such as on the annual sulfur averaging report) could be accomplished with an additional 0.50 hour clerical time

 7)	The following assumptions were made in estimating the burden associated with the use by importers that import gasoline by truck of the alternate provisions to satisfy the requirement to test every batch of CG:
       -	All importers that import by truck will utilize the alternate provisions, since this will result in a significant reduction in the overall cost of compliance
       -	Foreign terminal operators currently have sampling and testing conducted by an independent third party as a customary business practice, and will continue to do so  -  this will release the terminal operator from additional activities which would otherwise be required
       -	To minimize the number of tests required, samples are already drawn after the receipt of each batch of gasoline into the storage tank at the terminal as a customary business practice
       -	All importers will contract with the independent third party that performs sampling and testing at the terminal(s) from which the importer receives gasoline to keep records of the required data and report it to the importer  -  by making this arrangement directly, the importer can demonstrate compliance with the requirement to conduct testing at the terminal facility without the need to undertake additional sampling and testing
       -	On average, two importers draw gasoline from the same terminal facility for importation into the U.S.  -  in such cases, the importers will split the cost of the third party's services.
       -	25 percent of importers use trucks (10 importers)
       -	The following costs would be billed to importers by the independent third party for services related to testing conducted at one terminal:  Independent third party will use an additional 1.0 hour of clerical employee time and 0.25 hour of technician time to complete the task (an additional 10 percent of this base cost could be added to account for overhead cost and to provide a profit margin)

 8)	The following assumptions were made in estimating the burden to refiners and importers of having an independent third party prepare an attest engagement report for submission to EPA:
       -	The main cost of preparing the attest engagement would be associated with reviewing existing records on gasoline sulfur content
 	-	It is estimated this task will require an extra five hours of technical employee time (to account for other costs and to provide a profit margin an additional 10 percent could be added to the cost derived using the assumptions under the previous bullet)

 9)	The following assumptions were made in estimating the burden to refiners, terminals and pipelines who conduct periodic QA testing for sulfur for defense purposes:
       -	60 pipelines and 1200 terminals will conduct downstream QA testing for sulfur in addition to many refiners (RFG refiners typically conduct downstream QA testing).  Assume $40 cost per periodic test, based on availability of field test equipment.  Assume 10 samples per year for QA testing per respondent.

 10)	The following assumptions were made in estimating the burden to terminal and pipelines that are required to test small refiner and small volume refinery batches for sulfur content:

      -	60 pipelines and 1200 terminals will test two batches of small refiner/small volume refinery gasoline for sulfur annually (many terminals and pipelines will test none and others more than two).  Assume cost of testing per batch is approximately $40, based on availability of field test equipment.

 11)	The following assumptions were made in estimating the burden to users of research and development gasoline of adding the required information to the application submitted to EPA to obtain an exemption:
       -	Adding the information on why sulfur compliant gasoline could not be used will require 0.50 hours of clerical time
 	-	This information is already available as a customary business practice

 12) 	 	The  following assumptions were made in estimating the burden to gasoline additive manufacturers to do the initial programming for PTDs
 	-	1 hour of technical time and 1 hour of clerical time

 13) 	The  following assumptions were made in estimating the burden to denatured fuel ethanol and other oxygenate producers to do the initial programming for PTDs
 	-	1 hour of technical time and 1 hour of clerical time

 	*Data reported to EPA under other 40 CFR Part 80 fuel programs (including the Tier 2 gasoline sulfur and RFG programs) was used in formulating these assumptions.

 	6(b)	Estimating Respondent Costs

 	The estimation of the hourly managerial, technical and clerical employee pay rates for the various regulated parties as well as the accounting assumptions used are discussed in the previous section on respondent burdens.  The estimated costs for the various regulated parties for this ICR are contained in Tables 6(b)1 and 6(b)2.
      Table 6(b)1: Annual Hourly Costs for Gasoline Refiners and Importers
            and Denatured Fuel Ethanol and Other Oxygenate Producers

 * This estimate is based on an average of 3 refineries per refiner.  In reality, larger refiners may own more refineries, while smaller refiners may own only one refinery.

     Table 6(b)2: Annual Costs for Gasoline Terminals, Pipelines, Truckers
            and Users of Research and Development (R&D) Gasoline

                              Collection Activity

                   Cost per Respondent ($)
                  Number of  Responses per Respondent per Year
                                  Total Annual
                                 Burden ($ per
                                   respondent

                                   Managerial
                                   ($110/hr)
                                   Technical
                                    ($96/hr)
                                    Clerical
                                    ($37/hr)
                                   Contractor
                                   Equivalent
                             ($40/hr - field test)

 Sampling and Testing
 for small refiner/small volume refinery gasoline
 Terminals
 Pipelines
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                      1.0
                                      1.0
                                       2
                                       2
                                      $80
                                      $80
 Q/A Periodic Sampling and
 Testing for Defense
 Terminals
 Pipelines
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                      1.0
                                      1.0
                                       10
                                       10
                                      $400
                                      $400
 R&D Applications
                                       0
                                       0
                                      0.5
                                       0
                                       1
                                      $24

 	6(c)	Estimating Agency Burden

 	Gasoline sulfur reports are handled as part of other 40 CFR Part 80 fuels reporting, including items accounted for in the reformulated gasoline (RFG) and anti-dumping ICR.  This estimate is restricted only to the reporting of sulfur values to EPA.  The Agency burden consist of 0.10 of a GS-13 technical worker ($ 161,000 including overhead), or $16,000; and 0.10 of a GS-7 clerical worker ($ 76,000 including overhead), or $7,600, for a total of $23,700.

 	6(d)	Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

 Gasoline Refiners and Importers:
 	Number of respondents (80 refiners/39 importers)				  119
 	Number of responses:							33,284
 	Annual burden hours, all refiners and importers*:				34,177
 	Annual cost, all refiners and importers*:					$2,396,810

        *These burden estimates are for all collection activities preformed by all refiners (see Table 6(e).1)

 Gasoline Terminal and Pipeline Operators:
 	Number of respondents (60 pipelines/1200 terminals):			1,260
 	Number of responses:							4,320
 	Annual burden hours, all terminal/pipeline operators:			4,320
 	Annual cost, all terminal operators:						$172,800

 Research and Development Applications:
 	Number of respondents:							1
 	Number of responses:							1
 	Annual burden, all R&D gasoline users:					0.50
 	Annual cost, all R&D gasoline users:						$24

 Gasoline Additive Manufacturers
 	Number of respondents 							1,175
 	Number of responses:							1,175
 	Annual burden hours:							2,350
 	Annual cost:							$156,275

 Denatured Fuel Ethanol and Other Oxygenate Producers
 	Number of respondents							   105
 	Number of responses:							42,315
 	Annual burden hours:							42,776
 	Annual cost:							$3,539,099

 	6(e)	Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables

 	(i)	Respondent Tally

 The total annual hourly burden and cost for this ICR is estimated to be 83,624 hours and $6,265,008, respectively.  The total number of responses for this ICR is estimated to be 81,095.

  Table 6(e).1: Annual Burdens and Costs for Gasoline Refiners and Importers
            and Denatured Fuel Ethanol and Other Oxygenate Producers

    Table 6(e)2: Annual Burdens and Costs for Gasoline Terminals, Pipelines
            and Users of Research and Development (R&D) Gasoline

                              Collection Activity

                        Annual Responses per Respondent
                             Number of Respondents
                           Burden Hours per Response
                      Total Annual Cost ($ per respondent)
                           Total Number of Responses
                      Total Hours per Year (all entities)
                       Total Annual Cost ($ all entities)
 Sampling/testing
  for small refiner/small volume refinery gasoline:
    Terminals
    Pipelines

 2
 2

 1200
     60
                                      1.0
                                      1.0
                                       80
                                       80
                                      2400
                                       120
                                      2400
                                      120
                                     96,000
                                     4,800
 Q/A periodic sampling/
 testing for defense:
    Terminals
    Pipelines

 10
 10

 120
   60

                                      1.0
                                      1.0
                                      400
                                      400
                                      1200
                                      600
                                      1200
                                      600
                                     48,000
                                     24,000
 R&D Applications
   1
     1
                                      0.5
                                       24
                                       1
                                      0.5
                                       24
 Total

                                     4,321
                                     4,321
                                    172,824

       (ii) Variations in the Annual Bottom Line

 	No annual variations in the respondent reporting/recordkeeping burden or cost over the course of this clearance period are expected.

 	6(f)		Burden Statement

 	Because the universe of respondents to the sulfur program is quite diverse, there is no "typical" respondent.  The annual burden is estimated to average between 12 and 500 hours per respondent, depending on the information collection requirements of the particular party.  The average number of hours per response is estimated to be approximately 1 hour.

 	Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency.  This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.

 	To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0258, which is available for online viewing at www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C.  The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.  The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>.  An electronic version of the public docket is available at www.regulations.gov.  This site can be used to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically.  When in the system, select "search," then key in the Docket ID Number identified above.  Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA.  Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0258 and OMB Control Number 2060-0437 in any correspondence.

 	C.	Attachments

 	Citations regarding the legal authority for the information collection requirements related to the control of gasoline sulfur content under the sulfur program are contained in the attachment.  Due to the length and complex technical nature of the regulations under the sulfur program, they are not contained in the attachment.  These sulfur regulations are located in subpart H of 40 CFR part 80.

                                   Attachment

                           Legal Authority Citations

                                 Clean Air Act

 42 U.S.C. 7414.

       Section 114: Inspection, Monitoring, and Entry
       (a) For the purpose:
             (i) of developing or assisting in the development of any implementation  plan under Section 110 or 111(d), any standard of performance  under Section 111, any emission  standard under Section 112,  [, or any  regulation of solid waste combustion under Section 129,]  [or any  regulation under section  129 (relating to solid waste combustion),]1
             (ii) of determining  whether any person is in violation of  any  such standard or any requirement of such a plan, or
             (iii) carrying out any provision of  this Act (except a  provision of title II with respect to a  manufacturer of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines):
                (1) the Administrator may require any person who owns or operates any emission source, who manufactures emission control equipment or process equipment, who the Administrator believes may have information necessary for the purposes set forth in this subsection, or who is subject to any requirement of this Act (other than a manufacturer subject to the provisions of Section 206(c) or 208 with respect to a provision of  title II) on a one-time, periodic or continuous basis to -
     						(A) establish and maintain such records;
     						(B) make such reports;
     						(C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring  equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods;
     						(D) sample such emissions  (in accordance with such procedures  or methods,  at  such locations,  at such  intervals, during such periods and in such  manner as the Administrator shall prescribe);
     						(E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical;
     						(F)  submit compliance certifications in  accordance with Section 114(a)(3); and
    						(G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonably require; and
     				(2  the Administrator or his authorized representative, upon presentation of his credentials -
                      (A)  shall have a right of entry to, upon, or through any premises of such person or in which any records required to be maintained under paragraph (1) of this section are located, and
                      B) may at reasonable times have access to and copy any records, inspect any monitoring equipment and method required under paragraph (1), and sample any emissions which such person is required to sample under paragraph (1).

 45 U.S.C.  7542.

          Section 208: Information Collection:
 		(a) Manufacturers responsibility.
 		"Every manufacturer shall establish and maintain such records, make such reports, and provide such information as the Administrator may reasonably require to enable him to determine whether such manufacturer has acted or is acting in compliance with this part and the regulations thereunder and shall, upon request of an officer or employee duly designated by the Administrator, permit such officer or employee at reasonable times to have access to and copy such records."


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 145 (Monday, July 29, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45462-45464]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18135]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 64

[Docket ID FEMA-2013-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-8289]

Suspension of Community Eligibility

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule identifies communities where the sale of flood
insurance has been authorized under the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) that are scheduled for suspension on the effective dates
listed within this rule because of noncompliance with the floodplain
management requirements of the program. If the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) receives documentation that the community has
adopted the required floodplain management measures prior to the
effective suspension date given in this rule, the suspension will not
occur and a notice of this will be provided by publication in the
Federal Register on a subsequent date. Also, information identifying
the current participation status of a community can be obtained from
FEMA's Community Status Book (CSB). The CSB is available at http://www.fema.gov/fema/csb.shtm.

DATES: Effective Dates: The effective date of each community's
scheduled suspension is the third date (``Susp.'') listed in the third
column of the following tables.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you want to determine whether a
particular community was suspended on the suspension date or for
further information, contact David Stearrett, Federal Insurance and
Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP enables property owners to purchase
Federal flood insurance that is not otherwise generally available from
private insurers. In return, communities agree to adopt and administer
local floodplain management measures aimed at protecting lives and new
construction from future flooding. Section 1315 of the National Flood
Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022, prohibits the sale
of NFIP flood insurance unless an appropriate public body adopts
adequate floodplain management measures with effective enforcement
measures. The communities listed in this document no longer meet that
statutory requirement for compliance with program regulations, 44 CFR
Part 59. Accordingly, the communities will be suspended on the
effective date in the third column. As of that date, flood insurance
will no longer be available in the community. We recognize that some of
these communities may adopt and submit the required documentation of
legally enforceable floodplain management measures after this rule is
published but prior to the actual suspension date. These communities
will not be suspended and will continue to be eligible for the sale of
NFIP flood insurance. A notice withdrawing the suspension of such
communities will be published in the Federal Register.
    In addition, FEMA publishes a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that
identifies the Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) in these communities.
The date of the FIRM, if one has been published, is indicated in the
fourth column of the table. No direct Federal financial assistance
(except assistance pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act not in connection with a flood) may be
provided for construction or acquisition of buildings in identified
SFHAs for communities not participating in the NFIP and identified for
more than a year on FEMA's initial FIRM for the community as having
flood-prone areas (section 202(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act
of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4106(a), as amended). This prohibition against
certain types of Federal assistance becomes effective for the
communities listed on the date shown in the last column. The
Administrator finds that notice and public comment procedures under 5
U.S.C. 553(b), are impracticable and unnecessary because communities
listed in this final rule have been adequately notified.
    Each community receives 6-month, 90-day, and 30-day notification
letters addressed to the Chief Executive Officer stating that the
community will be suspended unless the required floodplain management
measures are met prior to the effective suspension date. Since these
notifications were made, this final rule may take effect within less
than 30 days.
    National Environmental Policy Act. This rule is categorically
excluded from the requirements of 44 CFR Part 10, Environmental
Considerations. No environmental impact assessment has been prepared.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. The Administrator has determined that
this rule is exempt from the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act because the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended,
Section 1315, 42 U.S.C. 4022, prohibits flood insurance coverage unless
an appropriate public body adopts adequate floodplain management
measures with effective enforcement measures. The communities listed no
longer comply with the statutory requirements, and after the effective
date, flood insurance will no longer be available in the communities
unless remedial action takes place.
    Regulatory Classification. This final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 of September 30, 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR
51735.
    Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This rule involves no policies
that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
    Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule meets the
applicable standards of Executive Order 12988.
    Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule does not involve any collection
of information for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 64

    Flood insurance, Floodplains.

    Accordingly, 44 CFR part 64 is amended as follows:

PART 64--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for Part 64 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp.; p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp.; p. 376.

Sec.  64.6  [Amended]

0
2. The tables published under the authority of Sec.  64.6 are amended
as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Effective date
                                                 authorization/
                                   Community    cancellation of    Current effective map   Date certain Federal
       State and location             No.        sale of flood             date            assistance no longer
                                                  insurance in                              available in SFHAs
                                                   community
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Region I

Connecticut:
    East Lyme, Town of, New            090096  October 23, 1973,  Aug. 5, 2013..........  Aug. 5, 2013.
     London County.                             Emerg; June 15,
                                                1981, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Groton, City of, New London        090126  September 18,      ......do*.............   Do.
     County.                                    1973, Emerg; May
                                                15, 1980, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Groton, Town of, New London        090097  February 18,       ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    1972, Emerg;
                                                April 15, 1977,
                                                Reg; August 5,
                                                2013, Susp.
    Groton Long Point                  090167  August 20, 1974,   ......do..............   Do.
     Association, New London                    Emerg; March 18,
     County.                                    1980, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    New London, City of, New           090100  March 24, 1972,    ......do..............   Do.
     London County.                             Emerg; May 2,
                                                1977, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Noank Fire District, New           090129  September 25,      ......do..............   Do.
     London County.                             1973, Emerg;
                                                September 17,
                                                1980, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Old Lyme, Town of, New             090103  April 10, 1973,    ......do..............   Do.
     London County.                             Emerg; July 16,
                                                1980, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Stonington, Borough of, New        090193  May 4, 1976,       ......do..............   Do.
     London County.                             Emerg; November
                                                1, 1979, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Stonington, Town of, New           090106  May 28, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     London County.                             Emerg; September
                                                30, 1980, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Waterford, Town of, New            090107  August 23, 1974,   ......do..............   Do.
     London County.                             Emerg; February
                                                4, 1981, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.

           Region III

Maryland:
    Easton, Town of, Talbot            240067  October 9, 1974,   ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; September
                                                28, 1984, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Oxford, Town of, Talbot            240068  March 27, 1974,    ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; September
                                                28, 1984, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Saint Michaels, Town of,           240069  February 7, 1975,  ......do..............   Do.
     Talbot County.                             Emerg; November
                                                1, 1984, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Talbot County,                     240066  September 6,       ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                      1974, Emerg; May
                                                15, 1985, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Trappe, Town of, Talbot            240108  N/A, Emerg;        ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    August 15, 2006,
                                                Reg; August 5,
                                                2013, Susp.

           Region IV

Georgia:
    Bloomingdale, City of,             130452  October 6, 1975,   ......do..............   Do.
     Chatham County.                            Emerg; July 2,
                                                1981, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Chatham County,                    130030  September 18,      ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                      1970, Emerg;
                                                August 1, 1980,
                                                Reg; August 5,
                                                2013, Susp.
    Garden City, City of,              135161  October 8, 1971,   ......do..............   Do.
     Chatham County.                            Emerg; March 16,
                                                1973, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Pooler, City of, Chatham           130261  November 27,       ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    1974, Emerg;
                                                September 30,
                                                1981, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Port Wentworth, City of,           135162  June 4, 1971,      ......do..............   Do.
     Chatham County.                            Emerg; March 16,
                                                1973, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Savannah, City of, Chatham         135163  September 18,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    1970, Emerg; May
                                                21, 1971, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
Kentucky:

    Ashland, City of, Boyd             210017  March 19, 1975,    ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; September
                                                29, 1978, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Boyd County, Unincorporated        210016  December 12,       ......do..............   Do.
     Areas.                                     1975, Emerg;
                                                December 2,
                                                1980, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Catlettsburg, City of, Boyd        210018  August 21, 1975,   ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; January
                                                3, 1979, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
Tennessee:

    Farragut, Town of, Knox            470387  August 14, 1970,   ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; July 23,
                                                1971, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Knox County, Unincorporated        475433  August 14, 1970,   ......do..............   Do.
     Areas..                                    Emerg; July 23,
                                                1971, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
    Knoxville, City of, Knox           475434  August 14, 1970,   ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; April 30,
                                                1971, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2013,
                                                Susp.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* -do- = Ditto.
Code for reading third column: Emerg.--Emergency; Reg.--Regular; Susp--Suspension.

    Dated: July 8, 2013.
David L. Miller,
Associate Administrator, Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administration, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2013-18135 Filed 7-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13263-13264]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5466]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: FAA Entry
Point Filing Form--International Registry

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The respondents supply information through the AC 8050-135
to the FAA Civil Aviation Registry's Aircraft Registration Branch in
order to obtain an authorization code for access to the International
Registry.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by May 9, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Scott on<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0697.
    Title: FAA Entry Point Filing Form--International Registry.
    Form Numbers: AC Form 8050-135.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The information collected is necessary to obtain an
authorization code for transmission of information to the International
Registry. To transmit certain types of interests or prospective
interests to the International Registry, interested parties must file a
completed FAA Entry Point Filing Form--International Registry, AC Form
8050-135, with the FAA Civil Aviation Registry. Upon receipt of the
completed form, the FAA Civil Aviation Registry will issue the unique
authorization code.
    Respondents: Approximately 12,750 applicants.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.

    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 30 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 6,375 hours.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Carla
Scott, Room 712, Federal Aviation Administration, IT Enterprises
Business Services Division, AES-200, 800 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20591.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 3, 2011.
Carla Scott,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business
Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2011-5466 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P