[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 28, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41892-41894]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14968]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-7269; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-198-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Model A300 series airplanes; Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R,
and F4-600R series airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F
airplanes (collectively called Model A300-600 series airplanes); and
Model A310 series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report
indicating that during inspections to detect corrosion of the bulk
cargo doors, several cracks were discovered. This proposed AD would
require a general visual inspection of the bulk cargo door frame to
identify any structural repairs, a detailed visual inspection of the
frame at the repaired area for any cracking if necessary, and
corrective actions if necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and
correct cracking of the bulk cargo doors; such cracking could result in
rapid airplane decompression or possible loss of the bulk cargo door.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 12, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Airbus
SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44
51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
7269; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-7269;
Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-198-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2015-0238, dated December 18, 2015 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for Airbus Model A300
series airplanes; Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R series
airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes (collectively
called Model A300-600 series airplanes); and Model A310 series
airplanes. The MCAI states:

    During inspections to detect corrosion on the Bulk Cargo Doors
of Airbus A300 family aeroplanes, several cracks were discovered.
Investigations revealed that a set of SRM [structural repair manual]
repair solutions was defined in 1993, and was classified as
permanent and without limitation. As of 2011, this set of repair
solutions was revised and classified permanent, but with post-repair
required actions.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could result in
rapid decompression events or even loss of the bulk cargo door.
    As per Ageing Aircraft rules, it was determined that new
inspections have to be completed on the Bulk Cargo Door Frames to
detect potential fatigue damages on repaired structures or to
perform a new repair scheme.
    Based on the fact that several aeroplanes could potentially be
flying with potential fatigue damages on repaired structures, Airbus
was requested to issue Alert Operator Transmission (AOT) A53W010-15
to provide fleet-wide inspection instructions to address this
condition.
    For the reasons describes above, this [EASA] AD requires a one-
time inspection of the bulk cargo door frame to determine whether a
repair has been accomplished and, depending on findings,
accomplishment of applicable corrective action(s).

    The required actions in this NPRM include a detailed visual
inspection of the bulk cargo door frame at the repaired area for any
cracking, repair of cracks, and post-repair inspections of crack-free
frames. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2016-7269.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Airbus Alert Operators Transmission A53W010-15,
Revision 00, including Appendixes 1, 2, and 3, dated December 15, 2015.
The service information describes a general visual inspection of the
bulk cargo door frame to identify any structural repairs, and a
detailed visual inspection of the frame at the repaired area. This
service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these
same type designs.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 135 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
             Action                        Labor cost             Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection......................  1 work-hour x $85 per hour               $0              $85          $11,475
                                   = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD, except for the cost of reporting, specified as follows:

                           On-Condition Costs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Cost per
        Action            Labor cost       Parts cost        product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reporting............  1 work-hour x                $0              $85
                        $85 per hour =
                        $85.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paperwork Reduction Act

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information required by this proposed AD
is 2120-0056. The paperwork cost associated with this proposed AD has
been detailed in the Costs of Compliance section of this document and
includes time for reviewing instructions, as well as completing and
reviewing the collection of information. Therefore, all reporting
associated with this proposed AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the
accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC
20591, ATTN: Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2016-7269; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-
198-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by August 12, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 B2-1A, B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-
203, B4-2C, B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes; Model A300 B4-601, B4-603,
B4-620, B4-622, B4-605R, B4-622R, F4-605R, and F4-622R airplanes,
and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes; and Model A310-203, -
204, -221, -222, -304, -322, -324, and -325 airplanes, certificated
in any category, that have accumulated more than 14,600 total flight
cycles as of the effective date of this AD.

    Note 1 to paragraph (c) of this AD:  For airplanes that have
accumulated 14,600 total flight cycles or fewer as of the effective
date of this AD, no actions are required by this AD.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report indicating that during
inspections to detect corrosion of the bulk cargo doors, several
cracks were discovered. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
cracking of the bulk cargo doors; such cracking could result in
rapid airplane decompression or possible loss of the bulk cargo
door.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspection

    Within 250 flight cycles or 6 months after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs first, do a general visual inspection of
the bulk cargo door frame to identify the existence of any
structural repairs, in accordance with the instructions of Airbus
Alert Operators Transmission (AOT) A53W010-15, Revision 00,
including Appendixes 1, 2, and 3, dated December 15, 2015.

(h) Detailed Visual Inspection

    If, during the general visual inspection required in paragraph
(g) of this AD, any repair is found on the bulk cargo door frame:
Before further flight, do a detailed visual inspection for cracking
of the frame at the repaired area, in accordance with the
instructions of Airbus AOT A53W010-15, Revision 00, including
Appendixes 1, 2, and 3, dated December 15, 2015.

(i) Crack Repair

    If any cracking is found during the detailed visual inspection
required by paragraph (h) of this AD: Before further flight, repair
using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA
Design Organization Approval (DOA).

(j) Post-Repair Actions for Crack-Free Frames

    If no cracking is found during the detailed visual inspection
required by paragraph (h) of this AD: Do the actions in paragraphs
(j)(1) and (j)(2) of this AD.
    (1) At the applicable time specified in paragraph (j)(1)(i) or
(j)(1)(ii) of this AD: Send a report of the inspection results to
Airbus Service Bulletin Reporting Online Application on Airbus World
(https://w3.airbus.com/).
    (i) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 60 days after the inspection.
    (ii) If the inspection was done before the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 60 days after the effective date
of this AD.
    (2) Within 2,800 flight cycles after the detailed visual
inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD: Do applicable post-
repair inspections and repairs, using a method approved by the
Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA).

(k) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information may be
emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA;
or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(l) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2015-0238, dated December 18,
2015, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-7269.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 10, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-14968 Filed 6-27-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 136 (Friday, July 15, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41651-41653]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17400]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0217; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-165-AD;
Amendment 39-16748; AD 2011-15-01]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model DC-9-81 (MD-
81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), DC-9-87 (MD-87), and MD-88
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD requires a detailed inspection to detect
distress and existing repairs to the leading edge structure of the
vertical stabilizer at the splice at Station Zfs = 52.267; repetitive
inspections for cracking in the front spar cap forward flanges of the
vertical stabilizer, and either the aft flanges or side skins;
repetitive inspections for loose and missing fasteners; and related
investigative and corrective actions if necessary. This AD was prompted
by reports of cracked vertical stabilizer skin, a severed front spar
cap, elongated fastener holes at the leading edge of the vertical
stabilizer, and a cracked front spar web and front spar cap bolt holes
in the vertical stabilizer. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct such cracking damage, which could result in the structure being
unable to support limit load, and could lead to the loss of the
vertical stabilizer.

DATES: This AD is effective August 19, 2011.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of August 19,
2011.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800-0019, Long Beach, California 90846-
0001; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, extension 2; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger Durbin, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137; phone: 562-
627-5233; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
the specified products. That NPRM published in the Federal Register on
March 14, 2011 (76 FR 13543). That NPRM proposed to require a detailed
inspection to detect distress and existing repairs to the leading edge
structure of the vertical stabilizer at the splice at Station Zfs =
52.267; repetitive inspections for cracking in the front spar cap
forward flanges of the vertical stabilizer, and either the aft flanges
or side skins; repetitive inspections for loose and missing fasteners;
and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
and the FAA's response to each comment.

Support for the Proposed AD

    Boeing stated that it agrees with the NPRM.

Request To Change Heading for Paragraph (h) of the NPRM

    American Airlines (American) stated that the heading of
``Repetitive Inspections for Cracks, and Related Investigative and
Corrective Actions'' prior to paragraph (h) of the NPRM should not
include ``repetitive'' because paragraph (h) of the NPRM only address
initial inspections. From these statements, we infer that American
wants us to remove ``repetitive'' from the heading preceding paragraph
(h) of the NPRM.
    We disagree. The heading applies to all paragraphs following the
heading until the next header. Paragraph (h)(2) of this AD requires
repetitive inspections if no crack is detected by the initial
inspection. We have not changed the AD in this regard.

Request To Match Actions Proposed in NPRM to Actions in Service
Information

    American stated that Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A067,
dated June 24, 2010, in paragraph 4 and 5 of the Accomplishment
Instructions, recommends repetitive inspections of the leading edge and
spar cap structure, and that only paragraph (j) of the NPRM requires
repetitive inspections and then only for the leading edge structure
under some conditions. We infer that American wants us to change the AD
to match Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A067, dated June 24,
2010.
    We disagree with revising the AD. In addition to paragraph (j),
paragraph (h)(2) of this AD requires repetitive inspections for cracks
of the left and right vertical stabilizer front spar cap if no crack is
detected by the initial inspection, which is consistent with the
service information and results in the AD and service information
having consistent requirements. We have not changed the AD in this
regard.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD as proposed.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 668 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
             Action                      Labor cost          Parts cost    Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection for existing repairs,  10 work-hours x $85 per            $0  $850...............  $567,800.
 distress.                         hour = $850.
Repetitive inspections for        7 work-hours x $85 per             $0  $595 per inspection  $397,460 per
 cracking and loose and missing    hour = $595 per                        cycle.               inspection cycle.
 fasteners.                        inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2011-15-01 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-16748; Docket No. FAA-
2011-0217; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-165-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD is effective August 19, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model DC-9-81 (MD-81),
DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), DC-9-87 (MD-87), and MD-88
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A067, dated June 24, 2010.

Subject

    (d) Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport
Association (ATA) of America Code 55: Stabilizers.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD was prompted by reports of cracked vertical
stabilizer skin, a severed front spar cap, elongated fastener holes
at the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer, and a cracked front
spar web and front spar cap bolt holes in the vertical stabilizer.
We are issuing this AD to detect and correct such cracking damage,
which could result in the structure being unable to support limit
load,

and could lead to the loss of the vertical stabilizer.

Compliance

    (f) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

Inspections

    (g) Within 4,500 flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD, do a detailed inspection for distress in and existing repairs to
the leading edge structure of the vertical stabilizer at the splice
at Station Zfs=52.267, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A067, dated
June 24, 2010.

Repetitive Inspections for Cracks, and Related Investigative and
Corrective Actions

    (h) Before further flight after doing the inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, inspect for cracks of the left and right
vertical stabilizer front spar cap, in accordance with either Option
1 or Option 2 as specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A067, dated June 24, 2010. If
any crack is found, before further flight, evaluate and verify to
confirm all crack indications, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A067, dated
June 24, 2010.
    (1) If any cracking is confirmed, before further flight, repair
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (l) of this AD.
    (2) If no cracking is confirmed, repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed the applicable interval
specified in paragraph (h)(2)(i) or (h)(2)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) If the most recent inspection was done using Option 1, the
next inspection must be done within 4,400 flight cycles.
    (ii) If the most recent inspection was done using Option 2, the
next inspection must be done within 3,000 flight cycles.

Leading Edge Repair

    (i) If leading edge distress is found during the detailed
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD, before further
flight and after accomplishing the inspection required by paragraph
(h) of this AD, repair the leading edge, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-
55A067, dated June 24, 2010.

Inspection for Loose/Missing Fasteners

    (j) For airplanes on which no cracking is confirmed during the
initial inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD: At the
applicable time specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD,
do a detailed inspection for indications of loose and missing
fasteners, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A067, dated June 24, 2010. If
any loose or missing fastener is found, before further flight,
repair the leading edge, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A067, dated
June 24, 2010.
    (1) If the inspection required by paragraph (h) was done using
Option 1, do the inspection required by paragraph (j) of this AD
within 4,400 flight cycles after accomplishing the inspection
required by paragraph (h) of this AD.
    (2) If inspection required by paragraph (h) was done using
Option 2, do the inspection required by paragraph (j) of this AD
within 3,000 flight cycles after accomplishing the inspection
required by paragraph (h) of this AD.
    (k) For airplanes on which no cracking is confirmed during the
most recent inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD: Repeat
the inspection for loose and missing fasteners required by paragraph
(j) of this AD thereafter at intervals not to exceed the applicable
time specified in paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD.
    (1) If the most recent inspection required by paragraph (h) was
done using Option 1, the next inspection required by paragraph (j)
of this AD must be done within 4,400 flight cycles after
accomplishing the most recent inspection required by paragraph (j)
of this AD.
    (2) If the most recent inspection required by paragraph (h) was
done using Option 2, the next inspection required by paragraph (j)
of this AD must be done within 3,000 flight cycles after the most
recent inspection required by paragraph (j) of this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (l)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance
with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or
local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO to
make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair
must meet the certification basis of the airplane and 14 CFR 25.571,
Amendment 45, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.

Related Information

    (m) For more information about this AD, contact Roger Durbin,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712-4137; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Material Incorporated by Reference

    (n) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-55A067,
dated June 24, 2010, to do the actions required by this AD, unless
the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800-0019, Long Beach, California 90846-
0001; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, extension 2; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 1, 2011.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-17400 Filed 7-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 87 (Monday, May 6, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 19797]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09166]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4422-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2019-0001]

La Jolla Band of Luise[ntilde]o Indians; Major Disaster and
Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the La Jolla Band of Luise[ntilde]o Indians (FEMA-4422-
DR), dated March 26, 2019, and related determinations.

DATES: The declaration was issued March 26, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated March 26, 2019, the President issued a major disaster declaration
under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage to the lands associated with
the La Jolla Band of Luise[ntilde]o Indians resulting from severe
storms, flooding, landslides, and mudslides during the period of
February 14 to February 15, 2019, is of sufficient severity and
magnitude to warrant a major disaster declaration under the Robert
T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C.
5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford Act''). Therefore, I declare that such
a major disaster exists for the La Jolla Band of Luise[ntilde]o
Indians.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide assistance for debris removal
(Category A) and permanent work (Categories C-G) under the Public
Assistance program and Hazard Mitigation. Consistent with the
requirement that Federal assistance be supplemental, any Federal
funds provided under the Stafford Act for Hazard Mitigation will be
limited to 75 percent of the total eligible costs. Federal funds
provided under the Stafford Act for Public Assistance also will be
limited to 75 percent of the total eligible costs, with the
exception of projects that meet the eligibility criteria for a
higher Federal cost-sharing percentage under the Public Assistance
Alternative Procedures Pilot Program for Debris Removal implemented
pursuant to Section 428 of the Stafford Act.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, Mark Wingate, of FEMA is appointed
to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major disaster.
    The following areas have been designated as adversely affected by
this major disaster:

    The La Jolla Band of Luise[ntilde]o Indians for debris removal
(Category A) and permanent work (Categories C-G) under the Public
Assistance program.
    The La Jolla Band of Luise[ntilde]o Indians is eligible to apply
for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2019-09166 Filed 5-3-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on June 16, 2005

   NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2005-20909

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Application of EVERGREEN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES, INC. (EVERGREEN), filed
4/4/05, and supplemented on 6/2/05 for:

XX  Exemption for two years under 49 U.S.C. 40109 to provide the
following service:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail between a
point or points in the United States and any international airport in
the Liaoning area situated in China Zone 3 , and to integrate this
authority with its existing certificate and exemption authority and to
commingle traffic on all such authorized services as may be permitted
and consistent with applicable air transport agreements.

Applicant rep:  Robert P. Silverberg<PHONE_NUMBER>   DOT Analyst:  Thuy
H. Cooper<PHONE_NUMBER>

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX  Granted (subject to conditions, see below)

The above action was effective when taken: June 16, 2005, through June
16, 2007.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

XX   The exemption authority granted is consistent with the aviation
agreement between the United States

and the People’s Republic of China.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

XX  Holder’s certificate of public convenience and necessity

		XX  Standard Exemption Conditions (attached)

________________________________________________________________________
______________________

Conditions: The authority granted here is limited to services operated
only between the U.S. and the Liaoning area in China Zone 3.

________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department’s regulations, we found the applicant qualified to provide
the services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) grant of the application was consistent with the public
interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted, we denied all requests in the referenced
Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority granted in this
Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at: http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.aspU.S. Carrier
Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the U.S. carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2)  Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3)  Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4)  Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, including, but not limited to, 49 CFR Part 1544.
To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, the holder shall, before commencing any new service
(including charter flights) to or from a foreign airport, contact its
International Principal Security Inspector (IPSI) to advise the IPSI of
its plans and to find out whether the Transportation Security
Administration has determined that security is adequate to allow such
airport(s) to be served; and

(7)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations
of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the
United States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.

05/2004

 Under Annex V of the 1980 U.S.-China Agreement Relating to Civil Air
Transport, as amended by the Protocol to the Agreement, signed July 24,
2004 (Protocol), specifically, Article 3 of the Protocol, U.S. and
Chinese carriers may be designated to operate services between the U.S.
and points in China Zone 3 without frequency limitations.  China Zone 3
consists of the following areas: Chongqing, Gansu, Guangxi, Guizhou,
Hainan Island, Heilongjiang, Inner Mongolia, Jilin, Liaoning, Ningxia,
Qinghai, Shaanxi, Sichuan, Tibet, Xinjiang, and Yunnan.  Article 3 of
the Protocol contains certain limitations that apply in the case of
services carrying fifth-freedom traffic between Zone 3 points and
intermediate or beyond points in third countries, and in the case of
services to Zone 3 points via a point in China Zone 1 or Zone 2.  In its
June 2 supplement, Evergreen states that it does not seek any
fifth-freedom rights as referred to in Article 3 of the Protocol, nor is
it seeking to serve China Zone 3 via a point or points in China Zones 1
or 2.


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15679-15680]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06199]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 91

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0246; Amendment No. 91-321A; SFAR No. 112]
RIN 2120-AJ93

Prohibition Against Certain Flights Within the Tripoli Flight
Information Region (FIR); Extension of Expiration Date

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; extension of expiration date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action extends the prohibition of flight operations
within the Tripoli Flight Information Region (FIR) by all U.S. air
carriers; U.S. commercial operators; persons exercising the privileges
of an airman certificate issued by the FAA, except when such persons
are operating a U.S.-registered aircraft for a foreign air carrier; and
operators of U.S.-registered civil aircraft, except operators of such
aircraft that are foreign air carriers. The extension of the expiration
date is necessary to prevent a potential hazard to persons and aircraft
engaged in such flight operations while the FAA evaluates whether any
amendments to the regulation would be appropriate, given current
conditions in Libya.

DATES: In this action, amendment 2 to Sec.  91.1603 is effective March
21, 2014. Amendment 3 to Sec.  91.1603 is effective March 20, 2015.
    SFAR 112 (14 CFR 91.1603), published at 76 FR 16236 (March 23,
2011) and scheduled to expire on March 21, 2014, will remain in effect.
The expiration date is extended until March 20, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by docket number FAA-2011-
0246 using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building

Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system
of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions about this
final rule, contact: William Gonzalez, Air Transportation Division,
Flight Standards Service, AFS-220, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
For legal questions contact: Robert Frenzel, Office of the Chief
Counsel, AGC-200, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    As a result of safety and national security concerns regarding
flight operations in the Tripoli FIR (HLLL), the FAA issued section
91.1603 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Special Federal
Aviation Regulation 112 (SFAR No. 112), in March 2011. SFAR No. 112
prohibits all U.S. air carriers; U.S. commercial operators; persons
exercising the privileges of an airman certificate issued by the FAA,
except when such persons are operating a U.S.-registered aircraft for a
foreign air carrier; and operators of U.S.-registered civil aircraft,
except operators of such aircraft that are foreign air carriers, from
conducting flight operations in the Tripoli FIR, except as provided in
paragraphs (c) and (d) of that SFAR. When SFAR No. 112 was issued, an
armed conflict was ongoing in Libya and presented a potential hazard to
civil aviation. The FAA was concerned that runways at Libya's
international airports, including the main international airports
serving Benghazi (HLLB) and Tripoli (HLLT), might be damaged or
degraded. There was also concern that air navigation services in the
Tripoli FIR might be unavailable or degraded. In addition, the
proliferation of air defense weapons, including Man-Portable Air-
Defense Systems (MANPADS), and the presence of military operations,
including Libyan aerial bombardments and unplanned military flights
entering and departing the Tripoli FIR, posed a potential hazard to
U.S. operators, U.S.-registered aircraft, and FAA-certificated airmen
that might operate within the Tripoli FIR. Additionally, the UN
Security Council adopted Resolution 1973 on March 18, 2011, which
mandated a ban on all flights in the airspace of Libya, with certain
exceptions.
    Although the Gadhafi regime has been overthrown and the UN-mandated
ban on flights in Libyan airspace has been lifted, significant security
concerns remain for Libya and for the safety of U.S. civil aviation
operations in that country. On December 12, 2013, the Department of
State issued a Travel Warning strongly advising against all non-
essential travel to Libya. The security situation in country remains
unstable and various groups have called for attacks against U.S.
citizens and U.S. interests in Libya. As a consequence of the
unpredictable security environment, a potential hazard to U.S.-
registered aircraft, U.S. operators, and FAA-certified airmen still
exists. Many military-grade weapons remain in the hands of private
individuals and groups, among them anti-aircraft weapons that may be
used against civil aviation, to include MANPADS. The Travel Warning
also warns that closures or threats of closures of the international
airports occur regularly for maintenance, labor, or security-related
reasons. For these reasons, the FAA finds it necessary to extend the
expiration date of SFAR No. 112 for an additional one year.
    Because the circumstances described herein warrant immediate action
by the FAA, I find that notice and public comment under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B) are impracticable and contrary to the public interest.
Further, I find that good cause exists under 5 U.S.C. 553(d) for making
this rule effective immediately upon issuance. I also find that this
action is fully consistent with the obligations under 49 U.S.C. 40105
to ensure that I exercise my duties consistently with the obligations
of the United States under international agreements.
    If appropriate, the FAA may amend, supersede or rescind SFAR No.
112 prior to its new expiration date. Whether further extension of this
SFAR will be necessary will depend upon conditions in Libya in March
2015, which the FAA is unable to predict at this time.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 91

    Air traffic control, Aircraft, Airmen, Airports, Aviation safety,
Freight, Libya.

The Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends chapter I of title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:

PART 91--GENERAL OPERATING AND FLIGHT RULES

0
1. The authority citation for part 91 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 1155, 40103, 40113, 40120,
44101, 44111, 44701, 44704, 44709, 44711, 44712, 44715, 44716,
44717, 44722, 46306, 46315, 46316, 46504, 46506-46507, 47122, 47508,
47528-47531, 47534, articles 12 and 29 of the Convention on
International Civil Aviation (61 Stat. 1180), (126 Stat. 11).

0
2. Effective March 21, 2014, amend Sec.  91.1603 by revising paragraph
(e) to read as follows:

Sec.  91.1603  Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 112--Prohibition
Against Certain Flights Within the Tripoli (HLLL) Flight Information
Region (FIR).

* * * * *
    (e) Expiration. This Special Federal Aviation Regulation will
expire March 20, 2015. The FAA may amend, rescind, or extend this
Special Federal Aviation Regulation as necessary.

Sec.  91.1603  [Amended]

0
3. Effective March 20, 2015, amend Sec.  91.1603 by removing paragraph
(e)

     Issued under authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 44701(a),
and 44703 in Washington, DC, on March 14, 2014.
Michael P. Huerta,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-06199 Filed 3-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P