[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 106 (Thursday, June 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31955-31956]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13683]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13381-001]

Jonathan and Jayne Chase; Notice of Application Accepted for
Filing With the Commission, Intent To Waive Scoping, Soliciting Motions
To Intervene and Protests, Ready for Environmental Analysis, Soliciting
Comments, Terms and Conditions, Recommendations, and Prescriptions, and
Establishing an Expedited Schedule for Processing

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Exemption From Licensing.
    b. Project No.: 13381-001.
    c. Date filed: July 23, 2010.
    d. Applicant: Jonathan and Jayne Chase.
    e. Name of Project: Troy Hydropower Project.
    f. Location: On the Missisquoi River, in the Town of Troy, Orleans
County, Vermont. The project would not occupy lands of the United
States.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of
1978, 16 U.S.C. 2705, 2708.
    h. Applicant Contact: Jonathan and Jayne Chase, 361 Goodall Road,
Derby Line, VT 05830,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Tom Dean,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    j. Deadline for filing motions to intervene and protests, comments,
terms and conditions, recommendations, and prescriptions: Due to the
small size and particular location of this project and the close
coordination with state and federal agencies during the preparation of
the application, the 60-day timeframe in 18 CFR 4.34(b) for filing
motions to intervene and protests, comments, terms and conditions,
recommendations, and prescriptions is shortened. Instead, motions to
intervene and protests, comments, terms and conditions,
recommendations, and prescriptions will be due 30 days from the
issuance date of this notice. All reply comments must be filed with the
Commission within 45 days from the date of this notice
    All documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration,
using the

eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You
must include your name and contact information at the end of your
comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,
(202) 502-8659. Although the Commission strongly encourages electronic
filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an
original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    k. This application has been accepted for filing and is now ready
for environmental analysis.
    l. Project Description: The Troy Project would consist of: (1) The
existing 20.5-foot-high, 180-foot-long Bakers Falls dam equipped with a
134-foot-long spillway and a 3.33-foot-wide, 4.0-foot-high wastegate
located about 5 feet below the dam spillway; (2) an existing 0.61-acre
impoundment with a normal water surface elevation of 739.4 feet above
mean sea level; (3) an existing intake structure equipped with two
3.33-foot-wide, 4.0-foot-high headgates; (4) an existing forebay with a
2.0-foot-wide, 2.0-foot-high wastegate; (5) an existing 250-foot-long,
6.5-foot-diameter penstock; (6) an existing powerhouse containing one
inoperable 600-kilowatt (kW) generating unit; and (7) three existing
overhead 6.6-kilovolt 90-foot-long transmission lines.
    The applicant proposes to: (1) Rehabilitate or replace the
powerhouse; (2) increase the capacity of the inoperable generating unit
to 850 kW; and (3) replace the existing transmission lines with three
new buried 480 volt 90-foot-long transmission lines. The project would
be operated in a run-of-river mode, and would have an annual generation
of 1,500 megawatt-hours.
    m. Due to the project works already existing and the limited scope
of proposed rehabilitation of the project site described above, the
applicant's close coordination with federal and state agencies during
the preparation of the application, completed studies during pre-filing
consultation, and agency recommended preliminary terms and conditions,
we intend to waive scoping, shorten the notice filing period, and
expedite the exemption process. Based on a review of the application,
resource agency consultation letters including the preliminary 30(c)
terms and conditions, and comments filed to date, Commission staff
intends to prepare a single environmental assessment (EA). Commission
staff determined that the issues that need to be addressed in its EA
have been adequately identified during the pre-filing period, which
included a public meeting and site visit, and no new issues are likely
to be identified through additional scoping. The EA will consider
assessing the potential effects of project construction and operation
on geology and soils, aquatic, terrestrial, threatened and endangered
species, recreation and land use, aesthetic, and cultural and historic
resources.
    n. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support.
    Register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support.
    o. Anyone may submit comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene
in accordance with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure,
18 CFR 385.210, .211, and .214. In determining the appropriate action
to take, the Commission will consider all protests or other comments
filed, but only those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with
the Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any
comments, protests, or motions to intervene must be received on or
before the specified comment date for the particular application.
    All filings must (1) Bear in all capital letters the title
``PROTEST'', ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', ``COMMENTS,'' ``REPLY COMMENTS,''
``RECOMMENDATIONS,'' ``TERMS AND CONDITIONS,'' or ``PRESCRIPTIONS;''
(2) set forth in the heading the name of the applicant and the project
number of the application to which the filing responds; (3) furnish the
name, address, and telephone number of the person protesting or
intervening; and (4) otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR
385.2001 through 385.2005. All comments, recommendations, terms and
conditions or prescriptions must set forth their evidentiary basis and
otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may
obtain copies of the application directly from the applicant. A copy of
any protest or motion to intervene must be served upon each
representative of the applicant specified in the particular
application. A copy of all other filings in reference to this
application must be accompanied by proof of service on all persons
listed in the service list prepared by the Commission in this
proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.
    p. Procedural schedule: The application will be processed according
to the following procedural schedule. Revisions to the schedule may be
made as appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Milestone                           Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of the availability of the EA....  October 2011.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: May 26, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-13683 Filed 6-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9776-9777]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3869]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0069; FRL-9269-2]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; The SunWise Program (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an
existing approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below,
describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated
burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before March 24,
2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA HQ-OAR-
2007-0069, to: (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation
Docket and Information Center, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460 and (2) OMB by mail to: Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget,
Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC
20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luke Hall-Jordan, Stratospheric
Protection Division, Office of Air and Radiation, Mail Code 6205J,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
(202) 343-2338; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On September 3, 2010 (75 FR 54143), EPA sought comments on
this ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received one comment. Since
EPA coordinates with other federal and non-federal entities working to
prevent skin cancer and other health effects from overexposure to the
sun, and both Congress and EPA allocate funding for the program, no
further justification for the comment is needed. Any additional
comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days
of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0069, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Air Docket in
the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave.,

NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the Air Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA
receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, confidential business information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about the electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov.
    Title: The SunWise Program (Renewal).
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1904.06, OMB Control No. 2060-0439.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on 2/28/2011. Under OMB
regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the
collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: The goal of the SunWise School Program is to teach
children and their caregivers how to protect themselves from
overexposure to the sun. The SunWise Program recognizes the challenge
of measuring the progress and evaluating the effectiveness of an
environmental and public health education program where the ultimate
goal is to reduce risk and improve public health. Therefore, the
continual and careful evaluation of program effectiveness through a
variety of means, including data from pre- and post-intervention
surveys, tracking and monitoring of classroom activities and school
policies, and consultation with experts, is necessary to monitor
progress and refine the program. Surveys to be developed and
administered include: (1) Teacher questionnaire for measuring their and
their students' receptivity to the educational component of the
Program; (2) Teacher individual interview component soliciting more
information about the program and the development of a recognition and
incentives program; (3) Don't Fry Day pledge asking educators to pledge
to incorporate sun safety into their spring and summer activities; (4)
Online interactive SunWise Sun Safety Certification Program enabling
students, adults, organizations, and employers to develop credentials
on sun safety awareness and behaviors; and (5) Partner pilot
questionnaire for measuring their and their audience's receptivity to
the educational component of the Program. The data will be analyzed and
results will indicate the Program's effect on participants' sun-
protection attitudes and behaviors, and will help guide the program's
further improvement. Additionally, information is collected when
educators sign up to receive a Tool Kit either on the Web or in person,
and when individuals participate in an on-line sun safety tutorial/
certification program. Responses to the collection of information are
voluntary. All responses to the collection of information remain
confidential, and where appropriate anonymous.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average less
than one hour per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Elementary and middle school
students, parents, and educators.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 8,960.
    Frequency of Response: annual.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 1,615 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $100,172, which includes no annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 195 hours annually
in the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory
of Approved ICR Burdens. More hours were added for teachers
participating in an individual interview. Hours were subtracted for
teachers administering the student survey. Hours were added for
teachers participating in the Don't Fry Day pledge. Hours and burden
for educators is about the same; hours for students has also decreased
significantly. The bottom line burden hours increased along with the
total cost.

    Dated: February 14, 2011.
John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-3869 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: May 16, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 96)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 28321]
[DOCID:fr16my08-3]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2008-0366]

Security Zone; Portland Rose Festival on Willamette River

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the Portland Rose Festival
Security Zone on the Willamette River from 1 a.m. on June 4, 2008 until
10 a.m. June 10, 2008. This action is necessary for the security of
public vessels on a portion of the Willamette River during the fleet
week of the Rose Festival. This security zone provides for the
regulation of vessel traffic in the vicinity of the moored public
vessels. During the enforcement period, entry into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his
designee.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.1312 will be enforced commencing
from 1 a.m. on June 4, 2008 until 10 a.m. June 10, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MST1 Lucia Mack, Coast Guard Sector
Portland, 6767 N. Basin Ave, Portland, OR 97217, telephone 503-240-
9311.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the Rose
Festival Security Zone established by 33 CFR 165.1312 from 1 a.m. on
June 4, 2008 until 10 a.m. June 10, 2008.
    Under the provisions of 33 CFR 165.33 a vessel may not enter the
regulated area, unless it receives permission from the Captain of the
Port or his designee. The Coast Guard may be assisted by other Federal,
State, or local law enforcement agencies in enforcing this regulation.
    This notice is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.1312 and 5
U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this notice in the Federal Register, the
Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with extensive advance
notification of this enforcement period via the Local Notice to
Mariners and marine information broadcasts.

    Dated: May 6, 2008.
F.G. Myer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Portland.
[FR Doc. E8-10921 Filed 5-15-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


                   EPA REGION 6 INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING
                   DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS FOR SLUDGE:
                      ARKANSAS, LOUISIANA, AND NEW MEXICO
                              REPORTING YEAR 2011

OVERVIEW

      Federal regulations contained in 40 CFR Part 503 are self implementing (i.e., compliance is required regardless of whether a permit contains the conditions). An updated version of the regulations can be found at EPA Region 6, web page <http://www.epa.gov/earth1r6/6en/w/sludge.htm>. The regulations require all Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) servicing a population greater than 10,000 or having a design flow rate greater than one million gallons per day, or designated as Class I facilities to submit an annual report to the permitting authority every year on February 19[th].

      In the packet of materials included with these instructions are a set of Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms which may be used for the annual sludge reports required by 40 CFR Parts 503.18, and 503.28. These reports are due on February 19, 2012, to EPA Region 6, the sludge permitting authority for the States of Arkansas, Louisiana, and New Mexico. If you require assistance for completing the DMRs, please call Ms. Nancy Williams at (214) 665- 7179. If you have questions regarding sewage sludge compliance with the Part 503 requirements, please contact Mr. Ted Palit, P.E. at<PHONE_NUMBER> or e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Arkansas and Louisiana facilities should note that while the NPDES Program has been delegated to the States of Arkansas and Louisiana, EPA Region 6 is still the permitting authority for sludge. Therefore, reporting required under 40 CFR Part 503 should be submitted to EPA Region 6 at the address provided below.

      Since June 2009, the EPA's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program began implementing the NetDMR data application system. NetDMR is a Web-based tool that allows NPDES permittees to electronically sign and submit their DMRs to EPA's Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS-NPDES) via the Environmental Information Exchange Network.

      Effective January 1, 2012, EPA Region 6 will stop supplying preprinted sludge DMR forms for reporting sludge or Part 503 compliance. To continue sending in paper DMR forms you must copy the forms and fill them in with the appropriate limits, codes and data. However, the simplest way to provide accurate DMR information to EPA Region 6 and to avoid violations for missing information, or late submittals, is to utilize electronic reporting forms that can be set up for you using the NetDMR system.

      You will need to get approval from EPA prior to using the NetDMR reporting system. If you would like more information on the background and process of NetDMR, visit the EPA website at www.epa.gov/netdmr. The steps needed to utilize NetDMR are simple:

    * You must have internet access.
    * Create a NetDMR account.
    * Submit a Subscriber Agreement.
    * Submit DMR data to the EPA test site.
    * Obtain approval from EPA.

Until you are approved for NetDMR, you must report your compliance on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) Form EPA.No. 3320-1, in accordance with the attached instructions.
      This new method of reporting data will improve data quality by allowing permittees to complete sludge DMRs that are specific to your facility. This process will eliminate running out of DMR forms; making duplicate copies; mailing to multiple organizations; and late submittal violations. NetDMR will also reduce errors due to typos, entry of data not required by the permit and missing information. EPA periodically offers web-based NetDMR training and the next training is scheduled for January 10[th] and 12[th], 2012. Both training sessions are necessary and are scheduled from 12:00 pm to 3:00 pm CST on each day. To register for the training, send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>To obtain future training information, please visit www.epa.gov/netdmr. For further questions about NetDMR and its approval process, please contact Helen Nguyen at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
      The complete set of sludge DMR forms consist of: Production and Use (Outfall SLDP); Land Application (Outfall SLLA); Surface Disposal (Outfall SLSA); and, Landfilling (Outfall SLDF). The entire set of forms must be appropriately completed (with facility name, address, NPDES number and appropriate monitoring period) and signed. If the form does not apply to the facility's use or disposal practice of sludge, then the form must be marked "No Discharge" in the top right hand corner and completed with appropriate signature. Please note that for reporting purposes all measurements: quantity, loading, and concentration shall be based on dry weight of sludge.

The original and one copy of the completed and signed reports must be mailed to EPA Region 6 at the following address:

                  EPA - Region 6
                  Water Enforcement Branch (6EN-WC)
                  1445 Ross Avenue
                  Dallas, TX 75202-2733

FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS/MONITORING PERIOD

PRODUCTION AND USE FORMS: The 2011 reporting year begins on January 1, 2011 and ends on December 31, 2011.

LAND APPLICATION AND SURFACE DISPOSAL FORMS: Facilities must indicate the actual frequency that sewage sludge is monitored in the "Frequency of Analysis" column. The minimum required frequency, indicated in Tables 1 of Parts 503.16 and 503.26, is dependent on the amount of sludge which is annually land applied or surface disposed, respectively.

A separate report shall be made and completed for EACH MONITORING PERIOD, and the appropriate monitoring period dates must be indicated at the top of the form. For example, if a facility is required to monitor once per quarter, four monitoring reports must be completed for each full reporting year.

In order to aid EPA in processing reports for multiple monitoring periods, facilities should indicate "Monitoring Period 1, Monitoring Period 2, Monitoring Period 3, etc..." in the comments section at the bottom of the DMR form for each of the separate reports.

Additional Reporting Requirements

In addition to the enclosed forms, facilities which land apply or surface dispose of sewage sludge are responsible for submitting the additional information required in Parts 503.18 or 503.28, respectively; i.e., appropriate certification statements, descriptions of how the management practices in Parts 503.14 or 503.24 are being met, and descriptions of how the site restrictions (if applicable) in Part 503.32(b)(5) are being met. This information must be attached to the original copy of the DMR forms when submitted to EPA.

Facilities which dispose of sewage sludge by incineration are required to provide the information required in Part 503.48 in addition to the DMR forms.

COMPLETION OF FORMS

The following instructions are for use in completing the individual sections of each type of sludge DMR form:

PRODUCTION AND USE

      This form is to be completed by all major and/or designated Class I facilities which generate sewage sludge. The annual production and use information must be reported in dry metric tons per year (MT/yr); other information shall be in the units indicated. If a particular sludge use does not apply to the facility's practice, then this must be indicated with a "0".

Annual Sludge Production - Facilities must indicate the amount of dry sewage sludge produced after final sludge treatment for the reporting period. Dry sludge quantity in metric tons may be calculated based on measured or estimated moisture content in the sludge.

Annual Sludge Land Applied - Facilities must indicate the amount of sewage sludge which it has prepared and which has been beneficially reused by land application. Facilities which provide sewage sludge to another facility which further prepares the sludge prior to land application need not report that amount of sludge which it has not prepared.

Annual Sludge Surface Disposed - Facilities must indicate the amount of sewage sludge which it has prepared and which has been disposed in a surface disposal unit.

Annual Sludge Landfilled - Facilities must indicate the amount of sewage sludge which it has prepared and which has been co-disposed in a municipal solid waste landfill.

Annual Sludge Incinerated - Facilities must indicate the amount of sewage sludge which it has prepared and which is disposed by incineration in a sewage sludge incinerator.

Annual Sludge Disposed by Other Methods - Facilities must indicate the amount of sewage sludge which it has prepared and which has been used or disposed by a method other than land application, surface disposal, incineration or co-disposal in a municipal solid waste landfill. Facilities which provide sewage sludge to another facility which further prepares the sludge, or changes the quality of the sludge, prior to land application, must report the amount provided to the other facility. The method of disposal or use other than those already indicated must be further described in the "Comments" section of the form.

Annual Sludge Transported Interstate - Facilities must indicate the amount of sewage sludge which it has prepared and which is transported to another state other than the one in which it was prepared for eventual use or disposal.

Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) - Facilities which generate or prepare sewage sludge must indicate the results of the TCLP test on the sludge. If the sludge has passed the test, the form must be indicated with a "0" (Pass). If the sludge does not pass the test, the form must be indicated with a "1" (Fail).

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) - Facilities which generate or prepare sewage sludge must indicate the concentration of PCBs (in mg/Kg) in the sludge.

LAND APPLICATION

      This form is to be completed by those facilities which prepare bulk sewage sludge for land application for beneficial reuse or which prepare sewage sludge to be sold or given away in a bag or other container. This form does not apply to those facilities which provide all of their sewage sludge to another facility which changes the quality of the sludge prior to land application.

      Please note that modifications to the regulation, published in the October 25, 1995, Federal Register removed chromium from the list of regulated pollutants for land application, and relaxed the limitations for selenium in land applied sludge.

Pollutant Table from 503.13 - The facility must indicate the pollutant table from Part 503.13 which is used to determine compliance with pollutant quality as follows:

      Table 2 - Used if bulk sewage sludge exceeds the Pollutant Concentrations of Table 3;

      Table 3 - Used if bulk sewage sludge or sewage sludge sold or given away in a bag or other container of one metric ton or less meets (does not exceed) the Pollutant Concentrations of Table 3;
      Table 4 - Used if sewage sludge is sold or given away in a bag or other container of one metric ton or less, does not meet the Pollutant Concentrations of Table 3, and contains a label or information sheet indicating an annual whole sludge application rate which does not cause any of the Annual Pollutant Loading Rates in Table 4 to be exceeded.

Metals - Information to be included in this portion of the form consists of three types:

      1) The cumulative loadings of the metals for a particular site (Kg/Ha);

      2) The monthly average concentrations of metals (mg/Kg); and

      3) The maximum concentrations of the metals (mg/Kg).

      All facilities which land apply bulk sewage sludge or sell or give away sewage sludge in a bag or other container for land application must indicate the maximum concentration for all metals during the monitoring period in the "Maximum Concentration" column. These concentrations are limited by the values of Table 1 of Part 503.13. The "Average Concentration" information must be completed by those facilities whose sludge meets the Table 3 Pollutant Concentrations. This information must reflect the highest concentration of each pollutant from any single sample during the monitoring period.

      For those facilities whose sludge does not meet the Pollutant Concentrations of Table 3 and which are subject to the cumulative loading rates of Table 2, the cumulative loading of the metals at a site must be reported in the "Maximum Loading" columns if the loading rate has reached 90% or more of the maximum rate allowed by Table 2 of Part 503.13. If the facility has more than one application site, then this form must be included for each site which has reached 90% or more of the maximum rate allowed. Facilities which do not use the cumulative loading rates must indicate this column with a "0" to reflect "Not Applicable". For purposes of reporting sludge concentration and loading, analytical values below detection limit shall be reported as "< x", where "x" represents the analytic method quantitation limit.

Level of Pathogen Requirement Achieved - Facilities must indicate the level of pathogen requirements achieved, if any. If the sludge meets the Class A requirements, the form must be indicated with a "1". If the sludge meets the Class B requirements, the form must be indicated with a "2". If the facility's sludge does not meet either the Class A or Class B levels, the facility must report "0" (None).

Pathogen Alternative Used - Facilities must indicate which alternative number is used to achieve the pathogen level indicated above. The alternative numbers are given in Part 503.32(a)(3)-(8) for Class A (#1-6) and Part 503.32(b)(2)-(4) for Class B (#1-3). For those facilities which have been issued a permit containing the new requirements under Part 503, the alternative numbers are given in Section I.B.3. of the permit. If the facility's sludge does not meet either of the pathogen reduction levels, it must report "0".

Vector Attraction Reduction Alternative Used - Facilities must indicate which alternative was used to achieve the vector attraction reduction requirement. The alternative numbers which apply to land application (#1-10) are given in Part 503.33(b)(1)- (10). For those facilities which have been issued a permit containing the new requirements under Part 503, the alternative numbers for vector attraction reduction are given in Section I.B.4. of the permit. If a facility is unable to meet any of the vector attraction reduction alternatives, it must report "0".

Annual Whole Sludge Application Rate - Facilities whose sewage sludge does not meet the Pollutant Concentrations of Table 3, which sell or give away sludge in a bag or other container as defined by Part 503, and which include (with the sludge) a label or information sheet containing an annual whole sludge application rate which does not cause any of the annual pollutant loading rates in Table 4 to be exceeded, must include that rate in this portion of the form. If this information does not apply to the facility, then it must indicate "0" to reflect "Not Applicable".

SURFACE DISPOSAL

Unit With Liner/Leachate Collection System - Facilities must indicate the presence of a liner and leachate collection system in the surface disposal unit. A unit with a liner is indicated with "1" (Yes). A unit without a liner is indicated with "0" (No).

Unit Boundary to Property Line - Facilities whose sewage sludge unit does not have a liner and leachate collection system must indicate the actual minimum distance (in meters) from the sewage sludge unit boundary to the property line of the surface disposal site.

Metals Concentrations - Facilities whose sewage sludge unit does not have a liner and leachate collection system must indicate the allowed pollutant concentrations for Arsenic, Chromium and Nickel from Tables 1 or 2 of Part 503.23., based on the unit boundary to property line distance. The allowed concentration must be entered into the "Average Concentration" column of the form. The actual maximum concentration measured by the permittee must be entered into the "Maximum Concentration" column of the form.

Facilities whose sewage sludge unit has a liner and leachate collection system need not indicate the pollutant concentrations but must indicate "0" to reflect "Not Applicable" in both the Average (allowed) and Maximum (actual) columns for the three pollutants.

Level of Pathogen Requirement Achieved - See Land Application procedures above.

Pathogen Alternative Used - See Land Application procedures above.

Vector Attraction Reduction Alternative Used - Facilities must indicate which alternative was used to achieve the vector attraction reduction requirement. The alternative numbers which apply to surface disposal (#1-11) are given in Part 503.33(b)(1)- (11). For those facilities which have been issued a permit containing the new requirements under Part 503, the alternative numbers for vector attraction reduction are given in Section I.B.4. of the permit. If a facility is unable to meet any of the vector attraction reduction alternatives, it must report "0".

LANDFILLING

In Compliance With Part 258 Requirements for Sludge - Facilities which generate sewage sludge which is co-disposed in a municipal solid waste landfill must indicate whether the sludge meets the requirements of 40 CFR Part 258 (passes TCLP and paint filter test). If the facility's sludge meets the requirements, it must report "l" (Yes). If the facility's sludge does not meet the requirements, it must report "0" (No).

COMPLETION OF FORMS BASED ON POLLUTANT CODES IN DMRS

The following instructions are in reference to each page of the DMRs and the respective pollutant codes:

PRODUCTION AND USE - SLDP

      This DMR must have all fields completed, which includes frequency of analysis and sample type, as this outfall is summary information and we need to know how much sludge was produced and the amount and method of disposal.

      A. Parameters 39516 and 46390 may be reported as N/A if they do not apply to your facility during the monitoring period.

      B. Parameters 49017 through 49023 require data showing the annual amount of sludge production and disposal; or, if none, report a zero (0) for each parameter.

      C. If Parameter 49019 shows sludge was produced, the appropriate parameter must be completed showing how the produced sludge was disposed, i.e.:

            1) by other methods (49017 requires stating what method was used in the comments section),
            2) incinerated (49018),
            3) land applied (49020) requires values be reported on the SLLA DMR accordingly. Please review your instructions to determine what monitoring frequency is required if sludge was land applied., i.e.

               a) <290, frequency of analysis for SLLA is once per year
               b) 290 to <1500, frequency of analysis for SLLA is once per quarter
               c) 1500 to <15,000, frequency of analysis for SLLA is once every two months
               d) 15,000 and over, frequency of analysis for SLLA is once per month,

            4) surface disposed (49021 requires values be reported on the SLSA DMR accordingly. Please review your instructions to determine what monitoring frequency is required if sludge was surface disposed., i.e.

   a)                   <290, frequency of analysis for SLLA is once per year
   b)                   290 to <1500, frequency of analysis for SLLA is once per quarter
   c)                   1500 to <15,000, frequency of analysis for SLLA is once every two months
   d)                   15,000 and over, frequency of analysis for SLLA is once per month),
   e)                   landfilled (49022 requires completion of the SLDF DMR), or
   f)                   transported interstate (49023).

LAND APPLICATION - SLLA

This DMR must be completed with values if any value other than 0" was shown on the SLDP DMR for parameter 49020. If parameter 49020 on the SLDP DMR was reported as 0", the No Discharge box should be marked at the upper right portion of the DMR.

SURFACE DISPOSAL - SLSA

This DMR must be completed with values if any value other than 0" was shown on the SLDP DMR for parameter 49021. If parameter 49021 on the SLDP DMR was reported as 0", the No Discharge box should be marked at the upper right portion of the DMR.

LANDFILL - SLDF

This DMR must be completed if any value other than 0" was shown on the SLDP DMR for parameter 49022. If parameter 49022 on the SLDP DMR was reported as 0", the No Discharge box should be marked at the upper right portion of the DMR.


[Federal Register: November 15, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 220)]
[Notices]
[Page 66509-66510]
[DOCID:fr15no06-41]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-54-000]

Nautilus Pipeline Company, LLC; Notice of Proposed Changes in
FERC Gas Tariff

November 7, 2006.
    Take notice that on November 1, 2006, Nautilus Pipeline Company,
LLC (Nautilus) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff,
Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to become effective
December 1, 2006:

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 3.
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 69.
Original Sheets Nos. 219-244.

    Nautilus states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all
affected customers of Nautilus and any interested state commissions.
However, due to the voluminous nature of this filing, Nautilus is not
providing copies of the filed agreements or red-lines of such
agreements as part of each service copy. Nautilus states that the
entire filing will be posted on its public Web site and that it will
provide copies of such agreements to any affected customer or
interested state commission who requests such copies.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in

accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken,
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Sec.  154.210 of the
Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing an
intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-19223 Filed 11-14-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 107 (Wednesday, June 4, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 32157]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12982]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 107 / Wednesday, June 4, 2014 / Rules
and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 121

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0944]

Pilot Assigned as Second in Command; Legal Interpretation

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 13, 2013, the FAA sought comment on a proposed
legal interpretation intended to clarify the qualification requirements
for the pilot assigned as second in command on a flight in part 121
operations that require three or more pilots and the pilot who provides
relief to the assigned second in command during the en route cruise
portion of the flight. On April 29, 2014, the FAA issued a legal
interpretation on these issues. This legal interpretation is available
on the agency's Web site and in the docket for the proposed legal
interpretation.

DATES: June 4, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may review the public docket for the proposed legal
interpretation (Docket No. FAA-2013-0944) on the Internet at
www.regulations.gov. You may also review the public docket at the
Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140, of the West Building Ground
Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara Mikolop, Attorney, Regulations
Division, Office of the Chief Counsel, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: 202 267-
3073.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 13, 2013, the FAA sought comment
on a proposed legal interpretation intended to clarify the
qualification requirements for (1) the pilot assigned as second in
command (SIC) on a flight in part 121 operations that require three or
more pilots and (2) the pilot who provides relief to the assigned SIC
during the en route cruise portion of the flight. See 78 FR 67983 (Nov.
13, 2013). The agency received 15 comments on the proposed legal
interpretation.
    On April 29, 2014, the FAA issued a legal interpretation on these
issues. The legal interpretation was adopted as proposed with minimal
clarifying information. It is available on the agency's Web site \1\
and in docket FAA-2013-0944.\2\ (A related legal interpretation
provided to Southern Air Inc. can also be found on the agency's Web
site and in docket FAA-2013-0944.) This legal interpretation reaffirms
Legal Interpretation 1978-27, which stated Sec.  121.432(a) requires a
pilot who serves as SIC of an operation that requires three or more
pilots to meet all pilot in command (PIC) qualification requirements
except for PIC operating experience. This legal interpretation also
clarifies that the pilot relieving the assigned SIC during the en route
portion of the flight need not meet the additional SIC qualification
requirements identified in Sec.  121.432(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc/pol_adjudication/agc200/interpretations.
    \2\ Instructions for access to docket FAA-2013-0944 can be found
in the ADDRESSES section of this document.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 29, 2014.
Mark W. Bury,
Assistant Chief Counsel for International Law, Legislation and
Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2014-12982 Filed 6-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Douglas 2016 SO2 Maintenance Plan docket -- modeling readme		2018-02-06
	See also the modeling TSD and MRLC_NED_files.txt.
	The actual NED files, and files used in creating maps, are available upon request.

Notes on AERSCREEN modeling and post-processing.

+--AERSCREEN
|  +--Fairview
|  +--Lhoist_k4
|  +--Lhoist_k5
|  +--MdC_B
|  \--MdC_K
+--maps
|  +--EGP_pieces
|  +--locns
|  \--shapes
+--NED
+--post-indiv
|  \--scripts
\--post-sums

------------------------------------------------------------
@ Top level files
@ Modeling File Naming -- Short Version
@ Modeling Files -- Details
@ AERSCREEN modeling input and output
@ Post-processing  (step numbers from the modeling TSD)
@ 1. Find the maximum concentration at each receptor point, regardless of season
@ 2. Interpolate concentrations to a common set of rectangular grid points
@ 3. Sum the concentrations for the emitting units within a facility
@ 4. Sum the facilities' concentrations at each point
@ 5. Scale the 1-hour concentrations to get 24-hour concentrations
@ 6. Extract concentrations for just the DMA
@ 7. Extract the overall maximum concentration
@ 8. Add maxima from ADEQ modeling of other sources, and monitored background concentration

############################################################

------------------------------------------------------------
@ Top level files

modeling_readme.txt       - this file, description of modeling
mapping_readme.txt        - description of mapping items in maps\
top_10_24hr_in_DMA.txt    - top 10 24-hour concentrations
EPA_Douglas_modeling.xlsx - source parameters, results tables, coordinates
MRLC_NED_files.txt for description of NED elevation files

Also, copies of the AERSCREEN input files from the respective facility subdirectories.
	Fairview_elev_aer.inp
	k4_32km.inp
	k5_32km.inp
	MdC_B_1b.inp
	MdC_K_1b.inp

############################################################

@ Modeling File Naming -- Short Version

Area subsets

DMA = Douglas Maintenance Area
_DMA = only points within the DMA per se
_DMAbox = points within box (rectangle) containing the DMA
_full = full AERSCREEN domain, different for each source; not limited to DMA

Note: All X,Y coordinates are UTM zone 12 easting and northing in km.  The DMA box is a UTM rectangle that contains the corners of the DMA after they were converted from longitude and latitude.

File extensions

.grd  Surfer binary grid format; values for regularly-spaced X,Y grid
.dat  space-delimited text X, Y, C, converted from Surfer .grd;
	incl.: _DMA_xyc.dat DMA-only concentrations (non-DMA removed)
.txt  plain text or tab-delimited text

Facilities and units

Fairview  - APS Fairview turbine
Lhoist  - Lhoist Douglas Chemical Lime Plant
	Lhoist_k4  - Lhoist kiln 4
	Lhoist_k5  - Lhoist kiln 5
MdC  - Mexicana de Cobre chemical lime plant
	MdC_B  - MdC boilers
	MdC_K  - MdC kilns

Fairview_Lhoist  - sum of Fairview and Lhoist
F_L_M            - sum of Fairview, Lhoist, and MDC

------------------------------------------------------------
AERSCREEN modeling

AERSCREEN\
	and facility subdirectories

Input files
	Fairview_elev_aer.inp
	k4_32km.inp
	k5_32km.inp
	MdC_B_1b.inp
	MdC_K_1b.inp

Debug concentrations.txt output files, to extract from
	FAIRVIEW_ELEV_concentrations.txt
	Lhoist_K4_32km_concentrations.txt
	LHOIST_K5_32KM_concentrations.txt
	MDC_B_concentrations.txt
	MDC_K_concentrations.txt

------------------------------------------------------------
Post-processing for individual units
	extraction of concentrations (max over month/season/surface sector)
	interpolation to common grid within DMAbox using Surfer

post-indiv\
post-indiv\scripts\

_xyzc.txt     - extracted X,Y,Z,C: UTM X,Y, Z elevation, Concentration
_CRZAmet.txt  - extracted X,Y and Conc, Radius, Z, Angle and meteorology
_summ.txt     - extraction summary
_DMAbox.grd   - interpolated points within DMAbox (Surfer)

------------------------------------------------------------
Post-processing for sums of units and facilities
	sum units, and scale and sum facilities, using Surfer

post-sums\

concentrations within DMAbox
	_sum_DMAbox.grd    - sum over units or over facilities
	_sum24_DMAbox.grd  - sum scaled to 24-hour concentrations (mult. by 0.6)

concentrations within DMA
	_sum24_DMA.grd     - sum scaled, non-DMA "blanked" (set to 1.70141E+038)
	_sum24_DMA.dat     - text version of sum scaled, non-DMA "blanked"
	_sum_DMA_xyc.dat   - text of sum (not scaled), non-DMA deleted
	_sum24_DMA_xyc.dat - text version of sum scaled, non-DMA deleted

############################################################

@ Modeling Files -- Details

============================================================

@ AERSCREEN modeling input and output
AERSCREEN\

The spreadsheet EPA_Douglas_modeling.xlsx lists the facility emission rates and stack parameters, which were copied from ADEQ's work. Source coordinates from EPA’s 2014 National Emissions Inventory (NEI)  and Mexico’s 2008 Inventario Nacional de Emisiones de México (Mexican National Emissions Inventory, INEM ), as cited by ADEQ.  The minimum and maximum distances for AERSCREEN receptors, "Amb. dist." and "Probe", respectively, were determined from the distances between a facility location and DMA: distance to nearest DMA corner or edge, and to farthest DMA corner or edge.

Fairview ----------
Minimum/Ambient:       0 m, since Fairview is within the DMA (reset to 1 m within AERSCREEN)
Maximum/Probe:   14500.0 m, rounded up from 14.479 km distance to DMA NW corner

Lhoist ----------
Minimum/Ambient:  8038.491 m, copied from ADEQ (26,373 ft), since smaller than calculated 8345.9 m distance to DMA West edge
Maximum/Probe:   27950 m, rounded up from 27942.9 m distance to DMA SE corner

Mexicana de Cobre ----------
Minimum/Ambient:  9846.564 m, distance to DMA South edge (US-Mexico border), smaller than ADEQ's 10 km (32,822 ft)
Maximum/Probe:   24625.0 m, rounded up from 24619.4 m distance to DMA North edge

AERSCREEN input files
	Fairview_elev_aer.inp
	k4_32km.inp
	k5_32km.inp
	MdC_B_1b.inp
	MdC_K_1b.inp
Note: The above short .inp files were actually used as AERSCREEN input. The other, longer .inp files below are just the last AERSCREEN.INP generated during AERSCREEN processing.

AERSCREEN output files, in subdirectories for each facility unit

Fairview\   --APS Fairview
	Fairview_elev_aer.inp
	FAIRVIEW_ELEV.inp
	FAIRVIEW_ELEV.OUT
	FAIRVIEW_ELEV_max_conc_distance.txt
	FAIRVIEW_ELEV_concentrations.txt

Lhoist_k4\   -- Lhoist kiln 4
	k4_32km.inp
	Lhoist_K4_32km.inp
	Lhoist_K4_32km.out
	Lhoist_K4_32km_max_conc_distance.txt
	Lhoist_K4_32km_concentrations.txt
Lhoist_k5\   -- Lhoist kiln 5
	k5_32km.inp
	LHOIST_K5_32KM.inp
	LHOIST_K5_32KM.OUT
	LHOIST_K5_32KM_max_conc_distance.txt
	LHOIST_K5_32KM_concentrations.txt

MdC_B\   -- Mexicana de Cobre boilers
	MdC_B_1b.inp
	MDC_B.inp
	MDC_B.OUT
	MDC_B_max_conc_distance.txt
	MDC_B_concentrations.txt
MdC_K\   -- Mexicana de Cobre kilns
	MdC_K_1b.inp
	MDC_K.inp
	MDC_K.OUT
	MDC_K_max_conc_distance.txt
	MDC_K_concentrations.txt

NED\   - (zipped) elevation files used by AERSCREEN
	MRLC_NED_files.txt - description of the NED files
	zipped USGS National Elevation Dataset (NED) files downloaded from MRLC:
		NED_43545157.zip - for Fairview
		NED_85588560.zip - for Lhoist
		NED_08392456.zip - for Mexicana de Cobre

============================================================

@ Post-processing  (step numbers from the modeling TSD)

post-indiv\  -- steps 1 & 2: extraction and gridding for individual units
	post-indiv\scripts\    -- scripts used in extraction
post-sums\   -- steps 3 - 7: sum units & facilities, scale to 24-hr average

------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------

Post-processing for individual units

------------------------------------------------------------
@ 1. Find the maximum concentration at each receptor point, regardless of season
post-indiv\
	xascr.pl output: *_xyzc.txt and *_summ.txt (and *_CRZAmet.txt)

Files with data extracted from the AERSCREEN debug concentrations.txt files. Extraction was done using the xascr.pl script to compute X, Y Cartesian coordinates (UTM) and to find the highest concentration for each receptor among the various meteorological conditions modeled in AERSCREEN. (I.e. the maximum over the combinations of month/season/surface sector; in this case, just the 4 seasons.)

	  Full domain for source           DMA only
	Fairview_full_CRZAmet.txt        Fairview_DMA_CRZAmet.txt
	Fairview_full_summ.txt           Fairview_DMA_summ.txt
	Fairview_full_xyzc.txt           Fairview_DMA_xyzc.txt
	Lhoist_k4_full_CRZAmet.txt       Lhoist_k4_DMA_CRZAmet.txt
	Lhoist_k4_full_summ.txt          Lhoist_k4_DMA_summ.txt
	Lhoist_k4_full_xyzc.txt          Lhoist_k4_DMA_xyzc.txt
	Lhoist_k5_full_CRZAmet.txt       Lhoist_k5_DMA_CRZAmet.txt
	Lhoist_k5_full_summ.txt          Lhoist_k5_DMA_summ.txt
	Lhoist_k5_full_xyzc.txt          Lhoist_k5_DMA_xyzc.txt
	MdCB_full_summ.txt               MdCK_DMA_summ.txt
	MdCB_full_xyzc.txt               MdCK_DMA_xyzc.txt
	MdCK_full_summ.txt               MdCB_DMA_summ.txt
	MdCK_full_xyzc.txt               MdCB_DMA_xyzc.txt

No "CRZAmet" files were created for Mexicana de Cobre.
The DMA files were used only for the map of receptors.

Types of concentration files extracted using xascr.pl:

*_summ.txt  --------------------
	Summary file
Text summary of the extraction; includes tables of the maximum concentration at each distance and at each wind angle, with their corresponding meteorological data.

*_xyzc.txt  --------------------
	X,Y coordinates, Z elevation, Concentration
tab-delimited; UTM coordinates, elevation, concentration, distance, and angle
header line:
X	Y	Z	C	R	A

Note that elevation Z is relative to mean sea level, i.e. it adds the source elevation to the "Elevation" in the original concentration.txt (which has elevation is relative to the source at zero).

Note that the wind angles here and in AERSCREEN are flow directions, i.e. the direction wind is blowing *toward*, measured clockwise from north at zero degrees.

*_CRZAmet.txt  --------------------
	C R Z A met: Concentration, Radius, Angle, Z elevation, Meteorology
tab-delimited, UTM coordinates prepended to concentration.txt variables including meteorology.
header line:
easting	northing	Concentration	Distance	Elevation	Flow	Season/Month	Zo sector	Date	H0	U*	W*	DT/DZ	ZICNV	ZIMCH	M-O LEN	Z0	BOWEN	ALBEDO	REF WS	AnemH	REF TA	TempH

This has all the same fields as the original concentrations.txt; however they are tab-delimited, have UTM coordinates prepended, and the wind speed and temperature reference height headings are 'AnemH' and 'TempH' (instead of both 'HT'). Elevation Z remains *relative* to source's at zero.

post-indiv\scripts\    -- scripts used in extracting from AERSCREEN output
	xascr.pl       - Perl script to extract data from AERSCREEN output
	xascr.htm      - xascr.pl documentation (converted from POD within script)
	xascr_FLM.bat  - batch file for concentration extraction

"bounds" files for script
	srcz_Fairview.txt  - source coordinates and elevation
	srcz_Lhoist.txt
	srcz_MdCobre.txt
	DMA_bounds_2rect_Fairview.txt  - source coordinates, and DMA as two rectangles
	DMA_bounds_2rect_Lhoist.txt
	DMA_bounds_2rect_MdC.txt
		See 'MA_coords' sheet of EPA_Douglas_modeling.xlsx

------------------------------------------------------------
@ 2. Interpolate concentrations to a common set of rectangular grid points
post-indiv\
	Surfer output *.grd

Files interpolated to grid by Surfer 8, and limited to box containing the DMA
	Fairview_DMAbox.grd
	Lhoist_k4_DMAbox.grd
	Lhoist_k5_DMAbox.grd
	MdCB_DMAbox.grd
	MdCK_DMAbox.grd

The interpolation was 1/r^2.
Grid Size: 	100 rows x 131 columns
Grid Geometry
	X Minimum:	628547.275
	X Maximum:	648061.33
	X Spacing:<PHONE_NUMBER>8461
	Y Minimum:	3467426.464
	Y Maximum:	3482230.307
	Y Spacing:<PHONE_NUMBER>7677
(The corners of the box are also in the file "maps\shapes\Douglas_SO2_MA_box_UTM.bln")

------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------

Post-processing for sums of units and facilities

------------------------------------------------------------
@ 3. Sum the concentrations for the emitting units within a facility
post-sums\
	"_sum" <-- individual units

Individual facilities
	Fairview_DMAbox.grd
		no unit summing, since just one unit

	Lhoist_sum_DMAbox.grd
		sum of Lhoist_k4_DMAbox.grd and Lhoist_k5_DMAbox.grd

	MdC_sum_DMAbox.grd
		sum of MdCB_DMAbox.grd and MdCK_DMAbox.grd

------------------------------------------------------------
@ 4. Sum the facilities' concentrations at each point
post-sums\

Facility sums
	Fairview_Lhoist_sum_DMAbox.grd
		sum of Fairview_DMAbox.grd and Lhoist_sum_DMAbox.grd; intermediate sum

	F_L_M_sum_DMAbox.grd
		sum of Fairview_Lhoist_sum.grd and MdC_sum_DMAbox.grd; overall sum

------------------------------------------------------------
@ 5. Scale the 1-hour concentrations to get 24-hour concentrations
post-sums\
	"sum24" <-- "sum"
		scaled *_DMAbox.grd by 0.6 to give 24-hr concentrations

Individual facilities
	Fairview_sum24_DMAbox.grd
	Lhoist_sum24_DMAbox.grd
	MdC_sum24_DMAbox.grd

Facility sums
	Fairview_Lhoist_sum24_DMAbox.grd  (not used)
	F_L_M_sum24_DMAbox.grd

============================================================

** blanking file:

"_sum" means sum over units or facilities
"_sum24" means sum scaled to a 24-hour value via multiplying by 0.6

------------------------------------------------------------
@ 6. Extract concentrations for just the DMA
post-sums\

---------------
- 6a. "Blank" values outside DMA
	"DMA" <-- "DMAbox"

applied "blanking" to give DMA-only receptors
For grid notes outside the DMA (Surfer blanking file: maps\shapes\Douglas_SO2_MA_UTM_blankout.bln), Surfer sets concentration to 1.70141E+038 to represent a blank that is not plotted.

Individual facilities; for plot DMA_conc_indiv.srf / DMA_conc_indiv.png
	Fairview_sum24_DMA.grd
	Lhoist_sum24_DMA.grd
	MdC_sum24_DMA.grd

Facility sum; for plot DMA_conc.srf / DMA_conc.png
	F_L_M_sum_DMA.grd  -- 1-hr value
	F_L_M_sum24_DMA.grd

---------------
- 6b. Convert to plain text
	"sum24_DMA.dat" <-- "sum24_DMA.grd"

Individual facilities
	Fairview_sum24_DMA.dat
	Lhoist_sum24_DMA.dat

( These files not available, were edited to _DMA_xyc.dat version:
	MdC_sum24_DMA.dat
	F_L_M_sum_DMA.dat
	F_L_M_sum24_DMA.dat   )

---------------
- 6c. Remove values outside DMA
	"sum24_DMA.dat_xyc" <-- "sum24_DMA.dat"
	deleted lines with "blanked" values (1.70141E+038), plain text

Individual facilities - used to find individual facility maxes
	Fairview_sum24_DMA_xyc.dat
	Lhoist_sum24_DMA_xyc.dat
	MdC_sum24_DMA_xyc.dat

Facility sums - used to find overall max
	F_L_M_sum_DMA_xyc.dat       1-hr
	F_L_M_sum24_DMA_xyc.dat    24-hr

------------------------------------------------------------
@ 7. Extract the overall maximum concentration
Sort the _sum24_DMA_xyc.dat text files in Excel to get top 10 24-hour concentrations

	top_10_24hr_in_DMA.txt

------------------------------------------------------------
@ 8. Add maxima from ADEQ modeling of other sources, and monitored background concentration
Excel add

 See EPA_Douglas_modeling.xlsx, 'modparms' sheet


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 97 (Tuesday, May 19, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 30001]
[FR Doc No: 2020-10665]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No.-2020-34]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; Jet Linx
Aviation, LLC

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of Federal Aviation Regulations. The
purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and
participation in, the FAA's exemption process. Neither publication of
this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary
is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final
disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before May 26, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2020-0310
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140,
West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan Blatchford,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
Office of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 13, 2020.
Brandon Roberts,
Acting Executive Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2020-0310.
    Petitioner: Jet Linx Aviation, LLC.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: Sec. Sec.  135.337(b)(2) and (b)(6).
    Description of Relief Sought: Jet Linx Aviation, LLC (Jet Linx)
seeks relief from Sec. Sec.  135.337(b)(2) and (b)(6) of Title 14 of
the Code of Federal Regulations to allow Jet Linx to expand the
authority of certain check pilots to conduct Sec.  135.299 line checks
when those check pilots have not complied with all the requirements to
act as pilot in command of that aircraft in operations under part 135.
Due to the COVID-19 virus, FAA inspectors are unable to provide line
checks for the company. Jet Linx has insufficient line check pilots to
fulfill their need.

[FR Doc. 2020-10665 Filed 5-18-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 114 (Friday, June 13, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33878-33879]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13894]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 67

[Docket ID FEMA-2014-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1145]

Proposed Flood Elevation Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 7, 2010, the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) published in the Federal Register a proposed rule that included
modified Base (1% annual-chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) for the
locations along Cypress Creek Ditch and Victory Lake in Clay County,
Arkansas. FEMA is no longer proposing these flood elevation
determination changes along Cypress Creek Ditch and Victory Lake as
identified in the above-referenced rulemaking publication.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before July 14, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-
1145, to Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal
Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER> or (email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA publishes proposed determinations of
BFEs and modified BFEs for communities participating in the National
Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), in accordance with section 110 of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR
67.4(a).
    These proposed BFEs and modified BFEs, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are minimum requirements.
They should not be construed to mean that the community must change any
existing ordinances that are more stringent in their floodplain
management requirements. The community may at any time enact stricter
requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by other
Federal, State, or regional entities. These proposed elevations are
used to meet the floodplain management requirements of the NFIP and
also are used to calculate the appropriate flood insurance premium
rates for new buildings built after these elevations are made final,
and for the contents in those buildings.

Correction

    In the proposed rule published at 75 FR 62062-62063, in the October
7, 2010, issue of the Federal Register, FEMA published a table under
the authority of 44 CFR 67.4. The table, entitled ``Clay County,
Arkansas, and Incorporated Areas'', addressed several flooding sources
including Cypress Creek Ditch and Victory Lake. The proposed rule
listed modified BFEs for Cypress Creek Ditch and Victory Lake between
specific upstream and downstream locations listed in the table. FEMA is
no longer proposing these flood elevation determination changes along
Cypress Creek Ditch and Victory Lake as identified in the above-
referenced rulemaking publication.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: May 9, 2014.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-13894 Filed 6-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22529]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09299]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2014-P-1896]

Determination That OXYTOCIN in 5% Dextrose Injection Products
Were Not Withdrawn From Sale for Reasons of Safety or Effectiveness

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) has
determined that OXYTOCIN 5 United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Units in
Dextrose 5% (oxytocin), injectable, injection, 5 USP Units in 500
milliliters (mL), (1 USP Unit/100 mL); OXYTOCIN 10 USP Units in
Dextrose 5% (oxytocin), injectable, injection, 10 USP Units in 500 mL,
(2 USP Units/100 mL); OXYTOCIN 10 USP Units in Dextrose 5% (oxytocin),
injectable, injection, 10 USP Units in 1000 mL, (1 USP Unit/100 mL);
and OXYTOCIN 20 USP Units in Dextrose 5% (oxytocin), injectable,
injection, 20 USP Units in 1000 mL, (2 USP Units/100 mL), (hereinafter
``these oxytocin drug products'') were not withdrawn from sale for
reasons of safety or effectiveness. This determination will allow FDA
to approve an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) for these
oxytocin drug products, if all other legal and regulatory requirements
are met.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robin Fastenau, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6236, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-4510.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1984, Congress enacted the Drug Price
Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417)
(the 1984 amendments), which authorized the approval of duplicate
versions of drug products under an ANDA procedure. ANDA applicants
must, with certain exceptions, show that the drug for which they are
seeking approval contains the same active ingredient in the same
strength and dosage form as the ``listed drug,'' which is a version of
the drug that was previously approved. ANDA applicants do not have to
repeat the extensive clinical testing otherwise necessary to gain
approval of a new drug application (NDA).
    The 1984 amendments include what is now section 505(j)(7) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)(7)), which
requires FDA to publish a list of all approved drugs. FDA publishes
this list as part of the ``Approved Drug Products With Therapeutic
Equivalence Evaluations,'' which is known generally as the ``Orange
Book.'' Under FDA regulations, drugs are removed from the list if the
Agency withdraws or suspends approval of the drug's NDA or ANDA for
reasons of safety or effectiveness or if FDA determines that the listed
drug was withdrawn from sale for reasons of safety or effectiveness (21
CFR 314.162).
    A person may petition the Agency to determine, or the Agency may
determine on its own initiative, whether a listed drug was withdrawn
from sale for reasons of safety or effectiveness. This determination
may be made at any time after the drug has been withdrawn from sale,
but must be made prior to approving an ANDA that refers to the listed
drug (Sec.  314.161 (21 CFR 314.161)). FDA may not approve an ANDA that
does not refer to a listed drug.
    These oxytocin drug products are the subject of NDA 019-185, held
by Abbott Laboratories, and initially approved on March 29, 1985. These
oxytocin drug products are indicated for the initiation or improvement
of uterine contractions. In a December 26, 1995, letter, Abbott
Laboratories notified FDA that these oxytocin drug products were being
discontinued and requested withdrawal of NDA 019-185. In the Federal
Register of March 27, 1996 (61 FR 13506), FDA announced that it was
withdrawing approval of NDA 019-185, effective April 26, 1996. FDA has
moved these oxytocin drug products to the ``Discontinued Drug Product
List'' section of the Orange Book.
    TechReg Services, Inc. (TechReg), submitted a citizen petition
dated November 12, 2014 (Docket No. FDA-2014-P-1896), under 21 CFR
10.30, requesting that the Agency determine whether Oxytocin in
Dextrose 5%, injection, available as strengths 5, 10, and 20 units
under Abbott NDA 019-185, were withdrawn from sale for reasons of
safety or effectiveness. Although the citizen petition did not specify
the concentrations of the three strengths associated with NDA 019-185,
we have considered whether any of these oxytocin drug products approved
under NDA 019-185 were withdrawn for safety or effectiveness reasons.
    After considering the citizen petition and reviewing Agency
records, and based on the information we have at this time, FDA has
determined under Sec.  314.161 that these oxytocin drug products were
not withdrawn for reasons of safety or effectiveness. TechReg has
identified no data or other information suggesting that these oxytocin
drug products were withdrawn for reasons of safety or effectiveness. We
have carefully reviewed our files for records concerning the withdrawal
of these oxytocin drug products from sale. We have also independently
evaluated relevant literature and data for possible postmarketing
adverse events. We have found no information that would indicate that
these oxytocin drug products were withdrawn from sale for reasons of
safety or effectiveness.
    Accordingly, the Agency will continue to list these oxytocin drug
products in the ``Discontinued Drug Product List'' section of the
Orange Book. The ``Discontinued Drug Product List'' delineates, among
other items, drug products that have been discontinued from marketing
for reasons other than safety or effectiveness. ANDAs that refer to
these oxytocin drug products may be approved by the Agency as long as
they meet all other legal and regulatory requirements for the approval
of ANDAs. FDA has determined that labeling for these oxytocin drug
products should be revised to meet current standards and will advise
ANDA applicants how to submit such labeling.

    Dated: April 16, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-09299 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 52439]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22626]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

Bluebell Solar, LLC EG18-103-000
Casa Mesa Wind, LLC EG18-104-000
Titan Solar, LLC EG18-105-000
Big Sky North, LLC EG18-106-000
Cypress Creek Fund 11 Tenant, LLC EG18-107-000
Brantley Farm Solar, LLC EG18-108-000
Blue Summit Interconnection, LLC EG18-109-000
Minco IV & V Interconnection, LLC EG18-110-000
OCI Lamesa Solar II LLC EG18-111-000
Green Power Hilltopper Wind, LLC EG18-112-000
Enel Green Power Rattlesnake Creek Wind Project, LLC EG18-113-000
Enel Green Power Diamond Vista Wind Project, LLC EG18-114-000
Live Oak Wind Project, LLC EG18-116-000

DATE: October 11, 2018.
    Take notice that during the month of September 2018, the status of
the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became
effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a)
(2018).

    Dated: October 11, 2018.
 Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
 Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-22626 Filed 10-16-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 76 (Friday, April 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23627-23628]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09239]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Certification
of Aircraft and Airmen for the Operation of Light-Sport Aircraft

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. Information is maintained by owners and operators of light-
sport aircraft and is collected to be used by FAA safety inspectors in
determining whether required maintenance actions have been accomplished
on light-sport aircraft. The information is also used when
investigating accidents.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by June 18, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy DePaepe at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0730.
    Title: Certification of Aircraft and Airmen for the Operation of
Light-Sport Aircraft.
    Form Numbers: There are no FAA forms associated with this
collection.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: 14 CFR 91.417 requires the owners and operators of
light-sport aircraft to maintain a record of the current status of
applicable safety directives and transfer that information at the time
of sale of the aircraft. The information is used by FAA safety
inspectors in determining whether required maintenance actions have
been accomplished on aircraft. The information is also used when
investigating accidents.
    Respondents: Approximately 1,000 owners/operators of light-sport
aircraft.
    Frequency: Information is maintained and reported to the FAA as
needed.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 2 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 2,133 hours.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Kathy
DePaepe, Room 126B, Federal Aviation Administration, AES-200, 6500 S.
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 15, 2013.
Albert R. Spence,
FAA Assistant Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises
Business Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2013-09239 Filed 4-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 25319]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10841]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13080-003]

Putnam Green Power, LLC; Notice of Application Tendered for
Filing With the Commission and Soliciting Additional Study Requests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Exemption from Licensing.
    b. Project No.: 13080-003.
    c. Filing Date: April 13, 2011.
    d. Applicant: Putnam Green Power, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Cargill Falls Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Quinebaug River, in the Town of Putnam, Windham
County, Connecticut. The proposed project would not occupy any Federal
lands.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of
1978, 16 U.S.C. 2705, 2708.
    h. Applicant Contact: Ms. Leanne Parker, Putnam Green Power, LLC,
58 Pomfrest Street, Putnam, CT 06260;<PHONE_NUMBER>;
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. FERC Contact: Jeff Browning at<PHONE_NUMBER>; or e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Cooperating agencies: Federal, state, local, and Tribal agencies
with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect to
environmental issues that wish to cooperate in the preparation of the
environmental document should follow the instructions for filing such
requests described in item l below. Cooperating agencies should note
the Commission's policy that agencies that cooperate in the preparation
of the environmental document cannot also intervene. See, 94 FERC ]
61,076 (2001).
    k. Pursuant to section 4.32(b)(7) of the Commission's regulations,
18 CFR 4.32(b)(7), if any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person
believes that an additional scientific study should be conducted in
order to form an adequate factual basis for a complete analysis of the
application on its merit, the resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person
must file a request for a study with the Commission not later than 60
days from the date of filing of the application, and serve a copy of
the request on the applicant. Because the application was denied and
then reinstated with a new filing date of April 13, 2011, a request for
a study must be filed with the Commission no later than 60 days from
April 13, 2011.
    l. Deadline for filing additional study requests and requests for
cooperating agency status: June 13, 2011.
    All documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration,
using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the
end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    m. The application is not ready for environmental analysis at this
time.
    n. Project description: (1) Two existing concrete gravity dams
consisting of a 60-foot-long, 18-foot-high overflow spillway, and an
85-foot-long, 18-foot-high gated spillway separated by a 70-foot-long
natural rock outcrop; (2) an existing 13-acre upper reservoir with a
normal water surface elevation of 253.4 feet above mean sea level; (3)
an existing forebay and intake structure equipped with four 3-foot-
wide, 5-foot-high gates; (4) an existing 135-foot-long penstock
bifurcating into existing 135-foot-long and 360-foot-long penstocks;
(5) two existing powerhouses, one that will contain a refurbished 530
kilowatt (kW) generating unit and one that will contain a refurbished
345 kW unit for a total installed capacity of 875 kW; (6) two existing
tailraces, one 75-foot-long, and one 125-foot-long; and (7) an existing
100-foot-long transmission line.
    o. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item h above.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support.
    p. With this notice, we are initiating consultation with the
Connecticut State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), as required by
106, National Historic Preservation Act, and the regulations of the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 36 CFR 800.4.
    q. Procedural schedule: The application will be processed according
to the following preliminary Hydro Licensing Schedule. Revisions to the
schedule will be made as appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue Notice of Acceptance................  June 2011.
Issue Notice of Ready for Environmental     June 2011.
 Analysis.
Comments, Recommendations, and Terms and    Aug. 2011.
 Conditions.
Commission issues EA......................  Nov. 2011.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: April 28, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-10841 Filed 5-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 112 (Friday, June 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 37605]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13710]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2016-N-0001]

Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of
Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announces a forthcoming
public advisory committee meeting of the Dermatologic and Ophthalmic
Drugs Advisory Committee. The general function of the committee is to
provide advice and recommendations to the Agency on FDA's regulatory
issues. The meeting will be open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on July 19, 2016, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: FDA White Oak Campus, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31,
Conference Center, the Great Room (Rm. 1503), Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002. Answers to commonly asked questions including information
regarding special accommodations due to a disability, visitor parking,
and transportation may be accessed at: http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm408555.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Shepherd, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, Rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-9001, FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or FDA Advisory
Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138<PHONE_NUMBER> in the
Washington, DC area). A notice in the Federal Register about last
minute modifications that impact a previously announced advisory
committee meeting cannot always be published quickly enough to provide
timely notice. Therefore, you should always check the Agency's Web site
at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm and scroll down to
the appropriate advisory committee meeting link, or call the advisory
committee information line to learn about possible modifications before
coming to the meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Agenda: The committee will discuss biologics license application
(BLA) 761032, brodalumab injection, a human monoclonal antibody,
submitted by Valeant Pharmaceuticals Luxembourg S.[agrave].r.l,
proposed for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in
adult patients who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy.
    FDA intends to make background material available to the public no
later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post
the background material on its Web site prior to the meeting, the
background material will be made publicly available at the location of
the advisory committee meeting, and the background material will be
posted on FDA's Web site after the meeting. Background material is
available at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/Calendar/default.htm. Scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee meeting
link.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee.
Written submissions may be made to the contact person on or before July
5, 2016. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between
approximately 1 p.m. and 2 p.m. Those individuals interested in making
formal oral presentations should notify the contact person and submit a
brief statement of the general nature of the evidence or arguments they
wish to present, the names and addresses of proposed participants, and
an indication of the approximate time requested to make their
presentation on or before June 24, 2016. Time allotted for each
presentation may be limited. If the number of registrants requesting to
speak is greater than can be reasonably accommodated during the
scheduled open public hearing session, FDA may conduct a lottery to
determine the speakers for the scheduled open public hearing session.
The contact person will notify interested persons regarding their
request to speak by June 27, 2016.
    Persons attending FDA's advisory committee meetings are advised
that the Agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical
outlets.
    FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with
disabilities. If you require accommodations due to a disability, please
contact Jennifer Shepherd at least 7 days in advance of the meeting.
    FDA is committed to the orderly conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our Web site at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm111462.htm for procedures
on public conduct during advisory committee meetings.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: June 6, 2016.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2016-13710 Filed 6-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 95205]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31103]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-79611; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2016-99]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on Proposed Rule
Change Amending Rule 104--Equities To Delete Subsection (g)(i)(A)(III)
Prohibiting Designated Market Makers From Establishing a New High (Low)
Price on the Exchange in a Security the DMM Has a Long (Short) Position
During the Last Ten Minutes Prior to the Close of Trading

December 20, 2016.
    On October 27, 2016, NYSE MKT LLC (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE MKT'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'')
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
amend Rule 104--Equities to delete subsection (g)(i)(A)(III)
prohibiting Designated Market Makers (``DMMs'') from establishing a new
high (low) price on the Exchange in a security the DMM has a long
(short) position during the last ten minutes prior to the close of
trading. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on November 17, 2016.\3\ The Commission received no
comments on the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79283 (November 10,
2016), 81 FR 81210 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding, or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is January 1, 2017. The Commission is extending this 45-day time
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the proposed rule change so as to allow
additional time to consider the proposal. Accordingly, the Commission,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\5\ designates February 15,
2017, as the date by which the Commission shall either approve or
disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2016-99).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-31103 Filed 12-23-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P