[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28733-28734]
[FR Doc No: E9-14190]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 35d-1; SEC File No. 270-491; OMB Control No. 3235-0548.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (``Act''), the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the
collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to
submit this existing collection of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension and approval.
    Rule 35d-1 (17 CFR 270.35d-1) under the Investment Company Act of
1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.) generally requires that investment
companies with certain names invest at least 80% of their assets
according to what their names suggests. The rule provides that an
affected investment company must either adopt this 80% requirement as a
fundamental policy or adopt a policy to provide notice to shareholders
at least 60 days prior to any change in its 80% investment policy. This
preparation and delivery of the notice to existing shareholders is a
collection of information within the meaning of the Act.
    The Commission estimates that there are 8,681 open-end and closed-
end management investment companies and series that have descriptive
names that are governed by the rule. The Commission estimates that of
these 8,681 investment companies, approximately 29 provide prior notice
to their shareholders of a change in their investment policies per
year. The Commission estimates that the annual burden associated with
the notice requirement of the rule is 20 hours per response. The total
burden hours for Rule 35d-1 is 580 per year in the aggregate (29
responses x 20 hours per response). Estimates of average burden

hours are made solely for the purposes of the Act, and are not derived
from a comprehensive or even a representative survey or study of the
costs of Commission rules and forms.
    The collection of information under Rule 35d-1 is mandatory. The
information provided under Rule 35d-1 is not kept confidential. The
Commission may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Charles Boucher, Director/
CIO, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432
General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: June 9, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-14190 Filed 6-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: October 1, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 189)]
[Notices]
[Page 55765-55767]
[DOCID:fr01oc07-45]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8476-3]

Proposed Settlement Agreement, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Settlement Agreement; Request for Public
Comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended (``Act''), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a
proposed settlement agreement, to address a lawsuit filed by Rocky
Mountain Clean Air Action (``RMCAA'') in the United States Court of
Appeals for the D.C. Circuit: Rocky Mountain Clean Air Action v. EPA,
No. 07-1012 (D.C. Cir.). Petitioner filed a petition for review
challenging EPA's final rule entitled ``Final Extension of the Deferred
Effective Date for 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(``NAAQS'') for Early Action Compact Areas,'' 71 FR 69022 (Nov. 29,
2006). Under the terms of the proposed settlement agreement, deadlines
have been established for EPA and the State of Colorado to take
specific actions related to the Denver Early Action Compact (``Denver
EAC'') area. Petitioner's sole remedy if EPA or the State fails to take
one of these actions is to request the court to lift the stay and to
set a briefing schedule.

DATES: Written comments on the proposed settlement agreement must be
received by October 31, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OGC-2007-0991, online at http://www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred method); by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>mailed to EPA Docket Center,

Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; or by hand delivery or courier to
EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. Comments on a disk or CD-

ROM should be formatted in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use of
special characters and any form of encryption, and may be mailed to the
mailing address above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jan Tierney, Air and Radiation Law
Office (2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Additional Information About the Proposed Settlement Agreement

    This case challenges the rule entitled ``Final Extension of the
Deferred Effective Date for 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standards for Early Action Compact Areas,'' 71 FR 69022 (Nov. 29,
2006). Specifically, Petitioner challenges EPA's action to issue a
further deferral of the effective date of the 8-hour ozone
nonattainment designation for the Denver EAC area from December 31,
2006 to July 1, 2007. Under the terms of the proposed settlement, EPA
will review and take final action on a regulation submitted by the
State of Colorado to EPA in August 2007 (``Regulation No. 7'') by March
25, 2008. Additionally, by November 20, 2007, EPA will evaluate the 8-
hour ozone air quality data for the Denver EAC area from 2005, 2006 and
the first three quarters of 2007 and if the data do not indicate a
violation of the 8-hour ozone standard, EPA will issue a final rule
further extending the deferral of the effective date of the
nonattainment designation until April 15, 2008. If the data do indicate
a violation of the 8-hour ozone standard, EPA will take no further
action and the nonattainment designation will be effective November 20,
2007. Based on whether the area has an effective nonattainment or an
effective attainment designation, the State of Colorado has to submit
either an attainment demonstration or a maintenance SIP revision for
the Denver EAC to EPA no later than July 1, 2009. If the State submits
an attainment demonstration SIP revision, EPA must sign a notice of
final agency action approving or disapproving the State of Colorado SIP
revision by October 1, 2010. If either EPA or the State fail to meet
any of these deadlines, RMCAA's sole remedy is to request the court to
lift the stay of the litigation and to set a briefing schedule.
    For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to
the proposed settlement agreement from persons who were not named as
parties or intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA or the
Department of Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed
settlement agreement if the comments disclose facts or considerations
that indicate that such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate,
or inconsistent with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the
Department of Justice determines, based on any comment which may be
submitted, that consent to the settlement agreement should be
withdrawn, the terms of the agreement will be affirmed.

II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Settlement
Agreement

A. How Can I Get A Copy Of the Settlement Agreement?

    The official public docket for this action (identified by Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2007-0991) contains a copy of the proposed settlement
agreement. The official public docket is available for public viewing
at the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA
Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566-
1752.
    An electronic version of the public docket is available through
http://www.regulations.gov You may use the http://www.regulations.gov.
to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the
contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents
in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``search,'' then key in the appropriate docket
identification number.
    It is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments,
whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available
for public viewing online at http://www.regulations.gov without change,

unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information
claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute is not included in the official public docket or in the
electronic public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material,
including copyrighted material contained in a public comment, will not
be placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only
in printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all
docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access
any of the publicly available docket materials through the EPA Docket
Center.

B. How and To Whom Do I Submit Comments?

    You may submit comments as provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.
    If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an e-mail address or other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD
ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
    Use of the http://www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments

to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments.
The electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's electronic mail
(e-mail) system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an
e-mail comment directly to the Docket without going through http://www.regulations.gov
, your e-mail address is automatically captured and

included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.

    Dated: September 25, 2007.
Richard B. Ossias,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E7-19333 Filed 9-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: November 5, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 213)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 57268-57270]
[DOCID:fr05no09-15]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-1033; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-104-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional
Jet Series 700, 701, & 702) Airplanes, Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet
Series 705) Airplanes, and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900)
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: Following in-flight test
deployments on CL-600-2B19 aircraft, several Air-Driven generators
(ADGs) failed to come on-line. Investigation revealed that, as a result
of a wiring anomaly that had not been detected during ADG manufacture,
a short circuit was possible between certain internal wires and their
metallic over-braided shields, which could result in the ADG not
providing power when deployed.
    The unsafe condition is that failure of the ADG could lead to loss
of several functions essential for safe flight. The proposed AD would
require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 21,
2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fabio Buttitta, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-1033;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-104-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We have lengthened the 30-day comment period for proposed ADs that
address MCAI originated by aviation authorities of other countries to
provide adequate time for interested parties to submit comments. The
comment period for these proposed ADs is now typically 45 days, which
is consistent with the comment period for domestic transport ADs.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On March 6, 2009, we issued AD 2009-06-18, Amendment 39-15855 (74
FR 13094, March 26, 2009). That AD required actions intended to address
an unsafe condition on the products listed above.
    Since we issued AD 2009-06-18, we have received notice that
additional suspect air-driven generators may have been installed
between the effective date of Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2008-
10, and the effective date of the equivalent FAA AD, AD 2009-06-18.
Therefore, we have determined that the actions required by paragraph
(f)(1) of AD 2009-06-18 are also required for Model CL-600-2C10
airplanes having serial numbers 10266 through 10273, and Model CL-600-
2D15 and CL-600-2D24 airplanes having serial numbers 15163 through
15223.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 304 products of U.S. registry.
    The actions that are required by AD 2009-06-18 and retained in this
proposed AD take about 5 work-hours per product, at an average labor
rate of $80 per work hour. Required parts cost about $0 per product.
Where the service information lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge
for these costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $121,600, or $400 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15855 (74 FR
13094, March 26, 2009) and adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly Canadair): Docket No. FAA-2009-1033;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-104-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by December 21, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) The proposed AD supersedes AD 2009-06-18, Amendment 39-
15855.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional
Jet Series 700, 701, & 702) airplanes, having serial numbers (SNs)
10004 and subsequent; and Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series
705) airplanes and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900)
airplanes, having SN 15002 and subsequent; certificated in any
category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24:
Electrical power.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    Following in-flight test deployments on CL-600-2B19 aircraft,
several Air-Driven generators (ADGs) failed to come on-line.
Investigation revealed that, as a result of a wiring anomaly that
had not been detected during ADG manufacture, a short circuit was
possible between certain internal wires and their metallic over-
braided shields, which could result in the ADG not providing power
when deployed. This directive mandates checking of the ADG and
modification of the ADG internal wiring, if required. It also
prohibits future installation of unmodified ADGs.

The unsafe condition is that failure of the ADG could lead to loss
of several functions essential for safe flight.

Restatement of Requirements of AD 2009-06-18

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) For airplanes identified in Table 1 of this AD: Within 12
months after April 30, 2009 (the effective date of AD 2009-06-18),
inspect the serial number of the installed ADG. A review of airplane
maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the
serial number of the ADG can be conclusively determined from that
review.

               Table 1--Bombardier Airplane Identification
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Model                             Serial Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CL-600-2C10 airplanes............  10004 through 10265.
CL-600-2D15 and CL-600-2D24        15002 through 15162.
 airplanes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (i) If the serial number is not listed in paragraph 1.A of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-24-015, Revision A, dated December
18, 2006, no further action is required by this AD.
    (ii) If the serial number is listed in paragraph 1.A of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-24-015, Revision A, dated December
18, 2006 (``the service bulletin''), within 12 months after April
30, 2009, inspect the ADG identification plate and, as applicable,
do the actions of paragraph (f)(1)(ii)(A) or (f)(1)(ii)(B) of this
AD.
    (A) If the identification plate is marked with the symbol ``24-
2,'' no further action is required by this AD.
    (B) If the identification plate is not marked with the symbol
``24-2,'' modify the ADG wiring in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin.
    (2) For all Model CL-600-2C10 airplanes having SN 10004 and
subsequent, and Model CL-600-2D15 and CL-600-2D24 airplanes having
SN 15002 and subsequent: As of April 30, 2009, no ADG part number
604-90800-19 (761339E), having SN 0101 through 0132, 0134 through
0167, 0169 through 0358, 0360 through 0438, 0440 through 0456, 0458
through 0467, 0469, 0471 through 0590, 0592 through 0597, 0599
through 0745, 0747 through 1005, or 1400 through 1439, may be
installed on any airplane, unless the identification plate of the
ADG is identified with the symbol ``24-2.''

    Note 1: Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-24-015, Revision A,
dated December 18, 2006, refers to Hamilton Sundstrand Service
Bulletin ERPS10AG-24-2, dated February 19, 2004, for further
information on identifying the symbol ``24-2.''

    (3) Actions done before April 30, 2009, according to Bombardier
Service Bulletin 670BA-24-015, dated May 17, 2004, are considered
acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions specified
in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, provided the ADG has not been
replaced since those actions were done.

New Requirements of This AD: Actions and Compliance

    (g) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) For airplanes identified in Table 2 of this AD: Within 12
months after the effective date of this AD, inspect the serial
number of the installed ADG. A review of airplane maintenance
records is acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the serial
number of the ADG can be conclusively determined from that review.

         Table 2--Additional Bombardier Airplane Identification
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Model                             Serial Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CL-600-2C10 airplanes............  10266 through 10273.
CL-600-2D15 and CL-600-2D24        15163 through 15223.
 airplanes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (i) If the serial number is not listed in paragraph 1.A of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-24-015, Revision A, dated December
18, 2006, no further action is required by this AD.
    (ii) If the serial number is listed in paragraph 1.A of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-24-015, Revision A, dated December
18, 2006 (``the service bulletin''), within 12 months after the
effective date of this AD, inspect the ADG identification plate and,
as applicable, do the actions of paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(A) or
(g)(1)(ii)(B) of this AD.
    (A) If the identification plate is marked with the symbol ``24-
2'', no further action is required by this AD.
    (B) If the identification plate is not marked with the symbol
``24-2'', modify the ADG wiring in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin.
    (2) Actions done before the effective date of this AD according
to Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-24-015, dated May 17, 2004, are
considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions
specified in paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, provided the ADG has not
been replaced since those actions were done.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2:  This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: The MCAI specifies to inspect Model CL-600-
2C10 airplanes having SNs 10004 through 10265 and Model CL-600-2D15
and CL-600-2D24 airplanes having SNs 15002 through 15162. This AD
also specifies to inspect Model CL-600-2C10 airplanes having serial
numbers 10266 through 10273, and Model CL-600-2D15 and CL-600-2D24
airplanes having serial numbers 15163 through 15223.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Fabio Buttitta, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New
York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (516) 794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the
AMOC applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (i) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2008-10,
dated February 5, 2008; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-24-
015, Revision A, dated December 18, 2006; for related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 29, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-26684 Filed 11-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 14, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 197)]
[Notices]
[Page 52799]
[DOCID:fr14oc09-54]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings No. 2

October 6, 2009.
    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP02-361-078.
    Applicants: Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C.
    Description: Gulfstream Natural Gas System, LLC submits Fifth
Revised Sheet No. 8.01p et al., to its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume
No. 1.
    Filed Date: 09/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091001-0074.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 13, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP02-534-016.
    Applicants: Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Guardian Pipeline, LLC submits Second Revised Sheet 9
to its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 09/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090930-0085.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 13, 2009.
    Docket Numbers: RP99-480-025.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits Original Sheet
No. 121B et al., to its FERC Gas Tariff, Seventh Revised Volume No. 1.
    Filed Date: 09/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091001-0073.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 13, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-880-001.
    Applicants: Northern Border Pipeline Company.
    Description: Northern Border Pipeline Company submits tariff sheet
in compliance with Commission's Letter Order dated 9/9/09.
    Filed Date: 09/16/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090916-0089.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 9, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-1043-002.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Equitrans submits response to data request issued 9/
25/09.
    Filed Date: 10/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091002-0178.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 13, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: RP09-1055-001.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
Sub. First Revised Sheet 466 to its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised
Volume 1, to be effective 10/22/09.
    Filed Date: 10/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091002-0209.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 14, 2009.

    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed on or before 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the specified comment
dates. Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on
all the parties to the proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-24581 Filed 10-13-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 143 (Friday, July 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 43464]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17546]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP14-1053-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Refund Report--Peoples Rates Effective 3-1-2014.
    Filed Date: 7/18/14.
    Accession Number: 20140718-5016.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/30/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-1112-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Negotiated Rate Service Agreement--Amend Exhibit A--
PDCM to be effective 4/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 7/18/14.
    Accession Number: 20140718-5043.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/30/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-1113-000.
    Applicants: MIGC LLC.
    Description: MIGC LLC Fuel Filing to be effective 8/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 7/18/14.
    Accession Number: 20140718-5129.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/30/14.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR Sec.  385.211 and Sec.  385.214) on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests
may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to
the proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP13-1031-008.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Report of Refunds.
    Filed Date: 7/18/14.
    Accession Number: 20140718-5112.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/30/14.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR Sec.  385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 21, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-17546 Filed 7-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P