[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34284-34286]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14517]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-64615; File No. SR-BX-2011-033]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify
the Functionality of the Post-Only Order

 June 7, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on June 1, 2011, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``BX'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing this proposed rule change to modify the
functionality of its Post-Only Order on the NASDAQ OMX BX Equities
System (the ``BX System'' or the ``System''). BX proposes to implement
the rule change thirty days after the date of filing or as soon
thereafter as practicable. The text of the proposed rule change is
available at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/, at BX's principal
office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    BX proposes to modify the functionality associated with its
existing Post-Only Order. Currently, if a Post-Only Order would lock an
order on the BX System at the time of entry, the order is re-priced and
displayed by the System to one minimum price increment (i.e., $0.01 or
$0.0001) below the current low offer (for bids) or above the current
best bid (for offers). Thus, if the best bid and best offer on the BX
book were $10.00 x $10.05, and a market participant entered a Post-Only
Order to buy at $10.05, the order would be re-priced and displayed at
$10.04. This aspect of the functionality of the order is not changing.
In addition, if a Post-Only Order would cross an order on the System,
the order will be repriced as described above unless the value of price
improvement associated with executing against a resting order

equals or exceeds the sum of fees charged for such execution and the
value of any rebate that would be provided if the order posted to the
book and subsequently provided liquidity, in which case the order will
execute. As provided by Rule 4757, price improvement accrues to the
party entering the order. Thus, if a sell order is on the book at $10
and a Post-Only Order to buy at $10.01 is entered, the order will
execute at $10. This aspect of the order's functionality is also not
changing.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The functionality was described in the original filing to
establish the Post-Only Order but was not fully reflected in the
text of Rule 4751. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59259
(January 15, 2009), 74 FR 4491 (January 26, 2009) (SR-BX-2009-003).
Accordingly, the rule is being amended to provide a complete
description of the order's current behavior when crossing an
existing order on the System.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At present, however, the order is repriced in a similar manner if
the order would lock or cross a protected quotation of another market
center. Thus, if the national best offer of $10.05 is being displayed
on another market center but not on BX, at present an order to buy at
$10.05 would be repriced and displayed at $10.04. Under the changed
functionality that BX is proposing, if the order locks or crosses the
other market center, the order will be accepted at the locking price
(i.e., the current low offer (for bids) or to the current best bid (for
offers)) and displayed by the System to one minimum price increment
(i.e., $0.01 or $0.0001) below the current low offer (for bids) or
above the current best bid (for offers). Thus, if the national best bid
and offer, as displayed on another market center, was $10 x $10.05, an
order to buy at $10.05 or higher would be accepted at the locking price
of $10.05, but would be displayed at $10.04. Subsequently, an incoming
order to sell at $10.05 or lower would be matched against the Post-Only
buy order. In this case, the incoming sell order would receive price
improvement.
    As a result of the change, the order will resemble more closely
BX's Price to Comply order, which uses a similar logic of retaining a
locking price but displaying at a non-locking price. The modified Post-
Only Order will serve to allow the market participant entering the
order to post its order at its desired price, unless the price would
lock or cross the BX book, in which case the order will execute or be
repriced, as is currently the case, to avoid the internal lock/cross.
The revised order type is designed to provide market participants with
better control over their execution costs and to provide them with a
means to offer price improvement opportunities to other market
participants.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ In addition to amending Rule 4751 to reflect the
functionality of the Post-Only Order, BX is also amending Rule 4755
to add references to the Post-Only Order, which had been
inadvertently omitted from that rule when the Post-Only Order was
first introduced.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    BX believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\5\ in general, and with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that the proposal is designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. BX also believes that the
modified order is consistent with Rule 610(d) under Regulation NMS.\7\
Rule 610(d) requires exchanges to establish, maintain, and enforce
rules that require members reasonably to avoid ``[d]isplaying
quotations that lock or cross any protected quotation in an NMS
stock.'' Such rules must be ``reasonably designed to assure the
reconciliation of locked or crossed quotations in an NMS stock,'' and
must ``prohibit * * * members from engaging in a pattern or practice of
displaying quotations that lock or cross any quotation in an NMS
stock.'' Rule 600 under Regulation NMS \8\ defines a ``quotation'' as a
``bid or offer,'' and in turn defines ``bid or offer'' to mean ``the
bid price or the offer price communicated by a member * * * to any
broker or dealer, or to any customer, at which it is willing to buy or
sell one or more round lots of an NMS security * * *.'' Thus, the
hidden price of the Post-Only Order is not a quotation under Regulation
NMS, and is therefore covered neither by the provisions of Rule 610
pertaining to displayed quotations nor by the provision requiring rules
to assure reconciliation of locked or crossed quotations. In this
respect, the order is similar to BX's existing Price to Comply order,
which uses a hidden locking price and a displayed non-locking price to
ensure compliance with this rule. It is also similar to the Post Only
Order of the BATS Exchange and the BATS-Y Exchange, as described in
BATS Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(4) and (6) and BATS-Y Exchange Rule
11.9(c)(4) and (6), and the Post Only Order of the EDGA Exchange and
EDGX Exchange, as described in EDGA Exchange Rule 11.5(c)(4) and (5)
and EDGX Exchange Rule 11.5(c)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \7\ 17 CFR 242.610(d).
    \8\ 17 CFR 242.600.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    BX does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. Rather, the change
will promote greater competition by allowing BX to adopt functionality
already in use at competing national securities exchanges.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and

arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BX-2011-033 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2011-033. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2011-033 and should be
submitted on or before July 5, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-14517 Filed 6-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7708-7709]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03645]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1-002.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation
    Description: Compliance filing: 2018-02-14 Petition for Limited
Tariff Waiver to Delay Implementation RSI 1b & 2 to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 2/14/18.
    Accession Number: 20180214-5133.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-499-001.
    Applicants: Southwestern Electric Power Company.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: SWEPCO-HOPE PSA RS#125 A&R
Windcatcher--Deferral to be effective 1/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 2/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180215-5000.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/8/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-500-001.
    Applicants: Southwestern Electric Power Company.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: SWEPCO-Bentonville PSA RS#126 A&R
Windcatcher Deferral Filing to be effective 1/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 2/14/18.
    Accession Number: 20180214-5166.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/7/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-858-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to ISA, Service
Agreement No. 4189; Queue No. Z2-012 to be effective 6/10/2015.
    Filed Date: 2/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180215-5041.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/8/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-859-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Request for a One-Time Tariff Waiver Pacific Gas and
Electric Company.

    Filed Date: 2/14/18.
    Accession Number: 20180214-5176.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/7/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-860-000.
    Applicants: East River Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Request for Limited Waiver of Tariff Provisions of
East River Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
    Filed Date: 2/14/18.
    Accession Number: 20180214-5181.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/7/18.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following qualifying
facility filings:
    Docket Numbers: QF17-935-000: QF18-936-000.
    Applicants: Zeeland Farm Services, Inc.
    Description: Refund report of Zeeland Farm Services, Inc.
    Filed Date: 2/14/18.
    Accession Number: 20180214-5170.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/7/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 15, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-03645 Filed 2-21-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 29, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38011-38013]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16245]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0114]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Hylebos Bridge Restoration, Hylebos Waterway,
Tacoma, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone
extending 50 yards to the north and south of the Hylebos Bridge,
Tacoma, WA in both directions along the entire length of the Hylebos
Bridge to ensure the safety of the boating public during the Hylebos
Bridge restoration project. This safety zone is necessary to protect
vessels transiting in the vicinity of the Hylebos Bridge from falling
debris resulting from concrete removal performed as part of the bridge
restoration.

DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m. on August 20, 2011 through 6
p.m. on August 22, 2011. The rule will be enforced daily from 6 a.m.
until 6 p.m. from August 20, 2011 through August 22, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2011-0114 and are available online by going to
http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0114 in the ``Keyword''
box, and then clicking ``Search.'' This material is also available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Ensign Anthony P. LaBoy, USCG Sector
Puget Sound Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard; telephone 206-
217-6323, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    On March 18, 2011, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Safety Zone; 2011 Hylebos Bridge Restoration, Hylebos
Waterway, Tacoma, WA in the Federal Register (76 FR 14829). We received
0 comments on the proposed rule. No public meeting was requested, and
none was held.

Background and Purpose

    The Hylebos Bridge restoration involves removal of deteriorated
concrete from the Hylebos Bridge and refinishing the bridge's surface.
The project poses a safety risk to any vessel traffic in the vicinity
below the bridge due to potential falling debris. The hydro demolition
machine that will be used can remove up to 16 inches of concrete in a
single pass presenting a major safety hazard to vessels, persons, or
property below. This safety zone will be enforced daily from 6 a.m.
until 6 p.m. from August 20, 2011 through August 22, 2011, unless
canceled sooner by the Captain of the Port.

Discussion of Comments and Changes

    The notice of proposed rulemaking for this rule did not receive any
comments.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not

require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
    The Coast Guard bases this finding on the fact that the safety zone
is small in size, short in duration, and maritime traffic will be able
to transit this area during times when the zone is not enforced.
Maritime traffic may also request permission to transit through the
zone from the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or Designated
Representative.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of the Hylebos Waterway from 6 a.m.
until 6 p.m. from August 20, 2011 through August 22, 2011. This safety
zone will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, because the safety zone is short in duration,
is minimal in size, and maritime traffic will be allowed to transit
through the safety zone with the permission of the Captain of the Port,
Puget Sound or Designated Representative.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule

involves the establishment of a temporary safety zone. An environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR Part 165, as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T13-177 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T13-177  Safety Zone; 2011 Hylebos Bridge Restoration,
Hylebos Waterway, Tacoma, Washington.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters
extending 50 yards to the north and south, along the entire length of
the Hylebos Bridge in Tacoma, WA.
    (b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR Part 165, Subpart C, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the
safety zone without permission of the Captain of the Port or Designated
Representative. See 33 CFR Part 165, Subpart C, for additional
requirements. Vessel operators wishing to enter the zone during the
enforcement period must request permission for entry by contacting
Vessel Traffic Service Puget Sound on VHF channel 14, or the Sector
Puget Sound Joint Harbor Operations Center at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (c) Authorization. All vessel operators who desire to transit
through or remain in the safety zone must obtain permission from the
Captain of the Port or Designated Representative. The Captain of the
Port may be assisted by federal, state, or local agencies as needed.
    (d) Enforcement Period. This rule is enforced daily from 6 a.m.
until 6 p.m. from August 20, 2011 through August 22, 2011 unless
canceled sooner by the Captain of the Port.

    Dated: June 3, 2011.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2011-16245 Filed 6-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P