			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on August 22, 2003

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST 2003-15123

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:  LONDON AIR SERVICES LIMITED
                             Date Filed:  May 6, 2003

Relief requested:  Exemption from 49 USC section 41301 to permit the
applicant to conduct passenger and cargo charter operations between:  1)
Canada and the United States; 2) third countries and the United States,
via Canada, that make a stopover in Canada for at least two consecutive
nights; and 3) other charters to/from the United States in accordance
with 14 CFR Part 212

If renewal, date and citation of last action:  New authority.

Applicant representative:  Gary B. Garofalo,<PHONE_NUMBER>       DOT
analyst:  Allen F. Brown,<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings:  None.

	DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved.			   			                      Action date:  August
22, 2003

Effective dates of authority granted:  August 22, 2003, through August
22, 2004.

Basis for approval (bilateral agreement/reciprocity):  United
States-Canada Air Transport Agreement (Agreement)

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to the
terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:  Standard exemption
conditions.

Special conditions/Remarks:  We found that London Air Services is
operationally and financially qualified to conduct its proposed
operations and is substantially owned and effectively controlled by
citizens of its homeland.  Also, the FAA advised us that it knows of no
reason to withhold this authority.

In the conduct of these operations, the carrier must adhere to all
applicable provisions of the U.S.-Canada Agreement, and may only use
aircraft designed to have a maximum passenger capacity of not more than
60 seats or a maximum payload capacity of not more than 18,000 pounds.
Moreover, under this authority the carrier may conduct charter
operations between: 1) Canada and the United States; and 2) third
countries and the United States, via Canada, that make a stopover in
Canada for a t least two consecutive nights.  Other charter to be
conducted under this authority, however, are subject to prior approval
under 14 CFR Part 212.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director, Office of International
Aviation

________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted/deferred/dismissed, we denied all requests in
the referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp


MEMORANDUM

DATE:		08/03/2015

SUBJECT:	Summary of Stakeholder Meetings with the Office of Atmospheric Programs and other EPA staff

FROM:	Kristina Friedman, EPA

TO:		Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR - 2013-0602 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This memorandum summarizes meetings with stakeholders beginning the week of June 2, 2014.

On June 5, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham presented at the Energy Storage Association 24[th] Annual Conference on the proposed Clean Power Plan.

On June 5, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions Business Environmental Leadership Council on the proposed Clean Power Plan. List of attendees attached.

On June 11, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan. List of attendees attached.

On June 17, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey presented to the Electricity Advisory Committee for the U.S. Department of Energy.

On June 15, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham presented at the Energy Storage Association 24[th] Annual Conference on the proposed Clean Power Plan.

On June 18, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey and Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the American Wind Energy Association. Sign-in sheet attached.

On June 18, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the Edison Electric Institute.

On June 19, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham and Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the Iowa Department of Natural Resources.

On June 19, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.

On June 20, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham presented to the Real Estate Roundtable Sustainability Policy Advisory Committee on the proposed Clean Power Plan.

On June 20, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey spoke with Paul Faeth of the Institute for Public Research.

On June 24, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the Gridwise Alliance. Sign-in sheet attached.

On June 24, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham met with the Alliance to Save Energy's policy and program committee on the proposed Clean Power Plan.

On June 25, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey participated in the National Association of Energy Service Companies's Mid-Atlantic Regional meeting.

On June 26, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey participated in a webinar with states and tribes on 111(d) State Plans.

On July 9, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham participated in a conference call with representatives from the Regional Greenhouse Gass Initiative.

On July 9, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey participated in a conference call with representatives from the American Electric Power Company.

On July 10, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the AEMA Advanced Energy Management Alliance. Sign-in sheet attached.

On July 14, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey participated in a conference call with representatives from the Midwestern Power Sector Collaborative. List of attendees attached.

On July 14, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the Union of Concerned Scientists. List of attendees and handouts are attached.

On July 17, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the Power & Energy Analytic Resources Inc. Sign-in sheet and presentation by Power & Energy Analytic Resources Inc. are attached.

On July 17, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham met with the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions Business Environmental Leadership Council on the proposed Clean Power Plan.

On July 17, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from Manitoba Hydro Electric Energy and Natural Gas. Sign-in sheet and presentation are attached.

On July 17, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the Sierra Club. Sign-in sheet attached.

On July 17, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse participated in the American Chemistry Council's Greenhouse Gas workshop.

On July 22, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham met with representatives from the State & Local Energy Efficiency Action Network. List of attendees and meeting agenda are attached.

On July 22, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the Clean Air Task Force, Resources for the Future, and Chicago Council on Global Affairs.

On July 24, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the Clean Air Task Force.

On July 24, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the Brattle Group.

On July 28, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from Puget Sound Energy.

On July 29, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the TransAlta Corporation. Sign-in sheet attached.

On August 1, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey and Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse participated in the Western Power Issues Roundtable organized by the Western Power Trading Forum. List of attendees are attached.

On August 1, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the American Nuclear Society. Sign-in sheet attached.

On August 4, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham, and Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association on the proposed Clean Power Plan. Sign-in sheet attached.

On August 4, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from FBR Capital Markets. Sign-in sheet attached.

On August 6, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the Edison Electric Institute. Sign-in sheet attached.

On August 9, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Program staff met with representatives from the Solar Energy Industries Association. Sign-in sheet attached.  On August 11, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from Duke University's Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions. Sign-in sheet attached.

On August 12, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham met with the ASTHO State Environmental Health directors on climate change and the proposed Clean Power Plan.

On August 12, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with Jeff Hopkins from the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. Sign-in sheet attached.

On August 20, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the State Energy Advisory Board.

On August 27, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from PNM Resources.

On August 28, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from Bloom Energy. Sign-in sheet attached.

On September 9, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the National Association of State Energy Officials.

On September 9, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs staff met with representatives from the American Wind Energy Association.

On September 14, 2014, EPA staff participated in a conference call with representatives from the National Association County Agricultural Agents, the Environmental Council of States, and the Association of Air Pollution Control Agencies. Sign-in sheet and material attached.

On September 24, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey, and Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse participated in a conference call with representatives from the National Association County Agricultural Agents, the Association of Air Pollution Control Agencies, and the Environmental Council of the States for WIRES on the proposed Clean Power Plan. List of attendees and handout are attached.

On October 1, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham participated in a panel discussion for WIRES on the proposed Clean Power Plan.

On October 6, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the Otter Tail Power.

On October 6, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse participated in a conference call with representatives from the North American Insulation Manufacturers.  On October 8, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham presented at the Business Council for Sustainable Energy fall membership meeting on the proposed Clean Power Plan.

On October 9, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham presented at the Advanced Energy Economy Energy Forward conference on the proposed Clean Power Plan.

On October 9, 2014, EPA staff participated in a conference call with representatives from the National Association County Agricultural Agents, the Environmental Council of States, and the Association of Air Pollution Control Agencies. Sign-in sheet and material attached.

On October 9, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey and Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with the Advanced Energy Management Alliance.

On October 14, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham presented at the Maryland Clean Energy Summit on the proposed Clean Power Plan.

On October 17, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the Clean Air Task Force. Sign-in sheet attached.

On October 21, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham presented at the Electricity Consumers Resource Council's fall workshop on the proposed Clean Power Plan.

On October 21, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the Southwest Power Pool Energy Network. Sign-in sheet and presentation by the Southwest Power Pool Energy Network are attached.

On October 24, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey and Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse participated in a conference call with representatives from the Center for Resources Solutions.

On October 27, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from PNM Resources. Sign-in sheet attached.

On October 27, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from Duke Energy.

On October 27, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the Edison Electric Institute.

On October 28, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse participated in a conference call with representatives from Midwest Renewable Energy Tracking System. Sign-in sheet and handout are attached.

On October 28, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from PNM Resources.

On October 28, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the American Water Works Association. Sign-in sheet and handout are attached.

On October 29, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from Johnson Controls Inc., United Technologies, Schneider Electric, Honeywell, and Siemens in a meeting organized by AJW. Sign-in sheet and handout are attached.

On November 5, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey participated in a webinar with states, territories, and tribes on the Notice of Data Availability for the Clean Power Plan.

On November 6, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from PNM Resources.

On November 10, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs staff met with representatives from the National Association of State Energy Officials. Sign-in sheet attached.

On November 12, 2014, Climate Change Division Director, Paul Gunning met with representatives from HY-TEK Bio, LLC. Sign-in sheet and presentation are attached.

On November 12, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from Resources for the Future.

On November 13, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey and Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse participated in a conference call with representatives from the Clean Air Task Force.

On November 13, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from John Hopkin's Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies.

On November 18, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners.

On November 18, 2014, EPA staff met with representatives from the Solar Energy Industries Association. List of attendees attached.

On November 20, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey participated in the Environmental, Health, and Safety & Sustainability Roundtable panel discussion.

On November 21, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham participated in a webinar for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops on climate change and proposed Clean Power Plan.

On November 25, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from PJM Interconnections LLC.

On December 3, 2014, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham met with the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers on the proposed Clean Power Plan.

On December 4, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey and Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the California Air Resources Board.

On December 8, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from Third Way.

On December 9, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the Bipartisan Policy Center.

On December 9, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the Mid-Atlantic Distributed Resources Initiative.

On December 10, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the Edison Electric Institute's Clean Air Strategy Group.

On December 12, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners.

On December 14, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the Bipartisan Policy Commission. Sign-in sheet attached.

On December 19, 2014, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with Richard Caperton from Opower.

On January 7, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with Claire Breidenich from Western Power Trading Forum. Sign-in sheet attached.

On January 14, 2015, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham participated in the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships EM&V Forum Annual Public Meeting to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan.

On January 22, 2015, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham participated in the Winter State and Local Energy Efficiency Action Network Executive Group meeting to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan.

On January 27, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey participated on the panel at the National Council on Science and Environment Energy & Climate Change Conference.

On January 28, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the Clean Air Task Force. Sign-in sheet attached.

On January 28, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the Canadian Electricity Association.

On January 29, 2015, Office of Atmospheric Programs staff met with representatives from the American Wind Energy Association. Sign-in sheet attached.

On February 5, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey participated in a conference organized by the Public Utilities Research Center.

On February 18, 2015, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham met with the American Forest and Paper Association Environment Resource Committee to discuss biomass and proposed Clean Power Plan.

On February 25, 2015, Office of Atmospheric Programs staff met with representatives from Babcock & Wilcox. Sign-in sheet attached.

On March 9, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the Canadian Electric Association and Manitoba Hydro Electric Energy and Natural Gas. Sign-in sheet attached.

On March 9, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the California Air Resources Board.

On March 12, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from PNM Resources.

On March 19, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from PSE&G.

On April 7, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the Edison Electric Institute. Sign-in sheet attached.

On May 5, 2015, Office of Atmospheric Programs Director, Sarah Dunham presented at the National Governors' Association Opening Workshop: Policy Academy on Examining Federal Greenhouse Gas Rules in the Electric Power Sector on the proposed Clean Power Plan.

On May 5, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the Business Council for Sustainable Energy.

On May 6, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey and Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the Clean Air Task Force. Sign-in sheet attached.

On May 7, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. Sign-in sheet attached.

On May 12, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey participated in the Industrial Energy Consumers of America Biannual Meeting.

On May 14, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey and Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the Edison Electric Institute.

On June 11, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met Ashley Hale from Competitive Power Ventures.

On June 16, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with representatives from the Solar Power Alliance.

On June 30, 2015, Office of Atmospheric Programs staff participated in a conference call with representatives from Solar Energy Industries Association.

On July 22, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division Director, Reid Harvey met with representatives from the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions.

On July 23, 2015, Clean Air Markets Division's Program Development Chief, Jeb Stenhouse met with Margaret Peloso from the Law Firm of Vinson & Elkins. Sign-in sheet attached.


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 112 (Friday, June 10, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35469-35470]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12413]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0715; Airspace Docket No. 22-ASW-13]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Revocation of Class E Airspace; Coalgate, OK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to remove the Class E airspace at
Coalgate, OK. The FAA is proposing this action due to the cancellation
of the instrument procedures at the associated airport, and the
airspace no longer being required.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 25, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone
(202) 366-9826, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2022-0715/Airspace Docket No. 22-ASW-13, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at https://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in
the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would remove the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Mary Hurley Hospital Heliport, Coalgate, OK, due
to the cancellation of the instrument procedures at this airport, and
the airspace no longer being required.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2022-0715/
Airspace Docket No. 22-ASW-13.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Federal Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021, and effective
September 15, 2021. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F
lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service
routes, and reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 by removing the
Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at
Mary Hurley Hospital Heliport, Coalgate, OK.
    This action is the result of the instrument procedures at this
airport being cancelled, and the airspace no longer being required.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order JO 7400.11F, dated August 10, 2021, and effective September
15, 2021, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class
E airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in FAA Order JO 7400.11.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally current, is non-controversial and
unlikely to result in adverse or negative comments. It, therefore: (1)
is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so
minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule,
when promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASW OK E5 Coalgate, OK [Remove]

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 6, 2022.
Martin A. Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2022-12413 Filed 6-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3067-3068]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00694]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity
and Foreign Air Carrier Permits

    Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B
(formerly Subpart Q) during the Week Ending December 29, 2012. The
following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B
(formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers,
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2012-0219.
    Date Filed: December 27, 2012.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify
Scope: January 17, 2012.

    Description: Application of 8199400 Canada Inc., DBA Arctic Sunwest
Charters requesting a foreign air carrier permit and exemption
authority to engage in on-demand charter transportation of passengers,
property and mail between point(s) in Canada and point(s) in the United
States, as well as other charters subject to pertinent national,
bilateral and international laws and regulations.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2012-0219.
    Date Filed: December 28, 2012.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify
Scope: January 22, 2012.
    Description: Application of USA Jet Airlines, Inc. (``USAJ'')
requesting the Department of Transportation disclaim jurisdiction over
the corporate reorganization of USAJ in which USAJ will be converted,
for tax proposes/planning, from a Delaware corporation to a Delaware
limited liability company bearing the name USA Jet Airlines, LLC on
December 31, 2012 (the ``Date of Reorganization'').

Barbara J. Hairston,
Acting Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2013-00694 Filed 1-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 179 (Wednesday, September 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55618-55619]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23282]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-RCRA-2015-0605, FRL-9934-18-OSWER]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Standardized Permit for RCRA Hazardous Waste
Management Facilities

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to
submit an information collection request (ICR), Standardized Permit for
RCRA Hazardous Waste Management Facilities (EPA ICR No. 1935.05, OMB
Control No. 2050-0182) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Before doing so, the EPA is soliciting
public comments on specific aspects of the proposed information
collection as described below. This is a proposed extension of the ICR,
which is currently approved through January 31, 2016. An Agency may not
conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 16, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
RCRA-2015-0605, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket
Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Gaines, Office of Resource
Conservation and Recovery, (5303P), Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:
703-308-8655; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Supporting documents which explain in detail the information the
EPA will be collecting are available in the public docket for this ICR.
The docket can be viewed online at www.regulations.gov or in person at
the EPA Docket Center, WJC West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. The telephone number for the Docket Center is 202-566-
1744. For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit
http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. The
EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval. At that time, the EPA will issue another Federal
Register notice to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB.
    Abstract: Under the authority of sections 3004, 3005, 3008 and 3010
of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended, EPA
revised the RCRA hazardous waste permitting program to allow a

``standardized permit''. The standardized permit is available to
facilities that generate hazardous waste and routinely manage the waste
on-site in non-thermal units such as tanks, containers, and containment
buildings. In addition, the standardized permit is available to
facilities that receive hazardous waste generated off-site by a
generator under the same ownership as the receiving facility, and then
store or non-thermally treat the hazardous waste in containers, tanks,
or containment buildings. The RCRA standardized permit consists of two
components: A uniform portion that is included in all cases, and a
supplemental portion that the Director of a regulatory agency includes
at his or her discretion. The uniform portion consists of terms and
conditions, relevant to the unit(s) at the permitted facility, and is
established on a national basis. The Director, at his or her
discretion, may also issue a supplemental portion on a case-by-case
basis. The supplemental portion imposes site-specific permit terms and
conditions that the Director determines necessary to institute
corrective action under section 264.101 (or State equivalent), or
otherwise necessary to protect human health and the environment. Owners
and operators have to comply with the terms and conditions in the
supplemental portion, in addition to those in the uniform portion.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Entities potentially affected by
this action are Business or other for-profit.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: voluntary (40 CFR 270.275).
    Estimated number of respondents: 866.
    Frequency of response: On occasion.
    Total estimated burden: 13,948 hours. Burden is defined at 5 CFR
1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $1,220,213, which includes $640,724
annualized labor costs and $579,489 annualized capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: The burden hours are likely to stay
substantially the same.

    Dated: September 8, 2015.
Barnes Johnson,
Director, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery.
[FR Doc. 2015-23282 Filed 9-15-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: October 22, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 203)]
[Notices]
[Page 54560-54561]
[DOCID:fr22oc09-46]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP09-433-000]

Fayetteville Express Pipeline LLC; Notice of Availability of the
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Fayetteville Express Pipeline
Project

October 15, 2009.
    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) of the
Fayetteville Express Pipeline Project proposed by Fayetteville Express
Pipeline LLC (FEP) in the above referenced docket. FEP requests
authorization to transport natural gas from the Fayetteville Shale
production area in Arkansas and provide about 2,000,000 dekatherms per
day of new transportation capacity to markets in the Midwest,
Southeast, and Northeast.
    The EA assesses the potential environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the proposed Fayetteville Express
Pipeline Project (Project) in accordance with the requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act. The FERC staff concludes that
approval of the proposed project, with appropriate mitigating measures,
would not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment.
    The Project includes the following proposed facilities:
     About 185 miles of 42-inch-diameter pipeline from Conway
County, Arkansas to Panola County, Mississippi;

     A total of 71,465 horsepower at the new Russell Compressor
Station in White County, Arkansas;
     18 meter stations at various gas receipt/delivery
locations; and
     Other appurtenant facilities as discussed in the EA.
    The EA has been placed in the public files of the FERC. A limited
number of copies of the EA are available for distribution and public
inspection at: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Reference
Room, 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-
8371.
    Copies of the EA have been mailed to Federal, State, and local
agencies; interested groups and individuals; newspapers and libraries
in the project area; and parties to this proceeding.
    Any person wishing to comment on the EA may do so. To ensure
consideration prior to a Commission decision on the proposal, it is
important that we receive your comments before the date specified
below.
    Your comments should focus on the potential environmental effects,
reasonable alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental
impacts. The more specific your comments, the more useful they will be.
To ensure that your comments are timely and properly recorded, please
send in your comments so that they will be received in Washington, DC
on or before November 16, 2009.
    For your convenience, there are three methods in which you can use
to submit your comments to the Commission. In all instances please
reference the project docket number (CP09-433-000) with your
submission. The Commission encourages electronic filing of comments and
has dedicated eFiling expert staff available to assist you at 202-502-
8258 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (1) You may file your comments electronically by using the Quick
Comment feature, which is located on the Commission's Internet Web site
at http://www.ferc.gov under the link to Documents and Filings. A Quick
Comment is an easy method for interested persons to submit text-only
comments on a project;
    (2) You may file your comments electronically by using the eFiling
feature, which is located on the Commission's Internet Web site at
http://www.ferc.gov under the link to Documents and Filings. eFiling
involves preparing your submission in the same manner as you would if
filing on paper, and then saving the file on your computer's hard
drive. You will attach that file as your submission. New eFiling users
must first create an account by clicking on ``Sign up'' or
``eRegister.'' You will be asked to select the type of filing you are
making. A comment on a particular project is considered a ``Comment on
a Filing;'' or
    (3) You may file your comments via mail to the Commission by
sending an original and two copies of your letter to: Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE.,
Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426;
    If you choose the option to mail your comments, label one copy of
the comments for the attention of Gas Branch 1, PJ11.1. Please mail
your comments promptly, so that they will be received in Washington, DC
on or before November 16, 2009.
    Comments will be considered by the Commission but will not serve to
make the commentor a party to the proceeding. Any person seeking to
become a party to the proceeding must file a motion to intervene
pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedures (18 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 385.214).\1\ Only
intervenors have the right to seek rehearing of the Commission's
decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Interventions may also be filed electronically via the
Internet in lieu of paper. See the previous discussion on filing
comments electronically.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Affected landowners and parties with environmental concerns may be
granted intervenor status upon showing good cause by stating that they
have a clear and direct interest in this proceeding which would not be
adequately represented by any other parties. You do not need intervenor
status to have your comments considered.
    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at 1-866-208-FERC (3372) or on
the FERC Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary
link. Click on the eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter
the docket number excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number
field (i.e. CP09-433). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date
range. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders,
notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries and direct links to
the documents. Go to http://www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-25401 Filed 10-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66621-66622]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27004]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2007-D-0433; (formerly Docket No. 2007D-0169)]

Draft Guidance for Industry on Bioequivalence Recommendation for
Lenalidomide Capsules; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Draft Guidance
on Lenalidomide.'' The guidance provides specific recommendations on
the design of bioequivalence (BE) studies to support abbreviated new
drug applications (ANDAs) for lenalidomide capsules. The draft guidance
is a revised version of a previously published draft guidance on the
subject.

DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on the
draft guidance before it begins work on the final versions of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by January 7, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing
your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.
    Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kris Andre, Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research (HFD-600), Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish
Pl., Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In the Federal Register of June 11, 2010 (75 FR 33311), FDA
announced the availability of a guidance for industry, ``Bioequivalence
Recommendations for Specific Products,'' which explained the process
that would be used to make

product-specific BE recommendations available to the public on FDA's
Web site at http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm. As
described in that guidance, FDA adopted this process as a means to
develop and disseminate product-specific BE recommendations and provide
a meaningful opportunity for the public to consider and comment on
those recommendations. This notice announces the availability of
revised draft BE recommendations for lenalidomide capsules.
    Revlimid (lenalidomide capsules), approved by FDA on December 27,
2005, is a thalidomide analogue indicated for the treatment of:
Multiple myeloma, in combination with dexamethasone, in patients who
have received at least one prior therapy and also in patients with
transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk
myelodysplastic syndromes associated with a deletion 5q abnormality
with or without additional cytogenetic abnormalities. Revlimid is
designated as the reference listed drug, and therefore any ANDAs for
generic lenalidomide capsules must demonstrate BE to the Revlimid prior
to approval. There are no approved ANDAs for this product.
    In June 2010, FDA posted on its Web site a draft guidance for
industry on the Agency's recommendations for BE studies to support
ANDAs for lenalidomide capsules. In that draft guidance, FDA
recommended studies in the 15 milligram (mg) and 25 mg strengths of
lenalidomide capsules to demonstrate BE. FDA has now determined that a
BE study in the 15 mg strength is unnecessary and is revising the
guidance to remove that recommendation. FDA also is revising the
guidance to recommend that a request for a waiver of in vivo testing be
submitted for the 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg strengths based on:
(1) Acceptable fasting and fed bioequivalence studies on the 25 mg
strength, (2) proportional similarity of the formulations across all
strengths, and (3) acceptable in vitro dissolution testing of all
strengths.
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the Agency's current thinking on the design
of BE studies to support ANDAs for lenalidomide capsules. They do not
create or confer any rights for or on any person and do not operate to
bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used if such
approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and
regulations.

II. Comments

    Interested persons may submit either written comments regarding
this document to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) or
electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov. It is only necessary
to send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the documents at
either http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: October 31, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-27004 Filed 11-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register: August 3, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 149)]
[Notices]
[Page 44070-44071]
[DOCID:fr03au06-89]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-54233; File No. SR-Phlx-2006-44]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change To Extend the Linkage Fee Pilot Program

July 27, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on July 17, 2006, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx''
or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons and is approving the
proposal on an accelerated basis for a pilot period through July 31,
2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Phlx proposes to extend, for a one-year period, a pilot
relating to transaction fees applicable to the execution of Principal
Acting as Agent Orders (``P/A Orders'') \3\ and Principal Orders (``P
Orders'') \4\ sent to the Exchange via the Intermarket Option Linkage
(``Linkage'') under the Plan for the Purpose of Creating and Operating
an Intermarket Option Linkage (the ``Plan'').\5\ The Exchange proposes
to extend the pilot through July 31, 2007. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the Phlx's Web site at (http://www.phlx.com
), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the

Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ A P/A Order is an order for the principal account of a
specialist reflecting the terms of a related unexecuted Public
Customer order for which the specialist is acting as agent. See Phlx
Rule 1083(k)(i).
    \4\ A P Order is an order for the principal account of an
Eligible Market Maker and is not a P/A Order. See Phlx Rule
1083(k)(ii).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 44482 (June 27,
2001), 66 FR 35470 (July 5, 2001) (Amendment to Plan to Conform to
the Requirements of Securities Exchange Act Rule 11Ac1-7); 43573
(November 16, 2000), 65 FR 70851 (November 28, 2000) (Notice of Phlx
Joining the Plan); and 43086 (July 28, 2000), 65 FR 48023 (August 4,
2000) (Approval of the Plan).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item III below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to extend the current
pilot program for one year, through July 31, 2007. The Exchange
currently charges $0.25 per option contract for P Orders sent to the
Exchange via Linkage under the Plan. The Exchange currently charges
$0.15 per option contract for P/A Orders.
    By extending the current pilot program, the Exchange should remain
competitive with other exchanges that charge fees for P and P/A
Orders.\6\

Consistent with current practice, the Exchange will charge the clearing
member organization of the sender of P and P/A Orders. Also, the
Exchange will not charge for the execution of Satisfaction Orders sent
through Linkage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 52168 (July 29,
2005), 70 FR 45454 (August 5, 2005) (SR-ISE-2005-32); 52147 (July
28, 2005), 70 FR 44706 (August 3, 2005) (SR-BSE-2005-25); 52151
(July 28, 2005), 70 FR 44713 (August 3, 2005) (SR-PCX-2005-86);
52073 (July 20, 2005), 70 FR 43474 (July 27, 2005) (SR-CBOE-2005-
54). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54064 (June 28,
2006), 71 FR 38438 (July 6, 2006) (SR-CBOE-2006-59).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\8\ in
particular, in that the proposed rule change provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its members
and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change does not impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-Phlx-2006-44 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2006-44. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-Phlx-2006-44 and should be submitted on or before August
24, 2006.

IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
the Proposed Rule Change

    After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange,\9\ and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of
the Act \10\ and the rules and regulations thereunder. The Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4)
of the Act,\11\ which requires that the rules of the Exchange provide
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among its members and other persons using its facilities. The
Commission believes that the extension of the Linkage fee pilot until
July 31, 2007 will give the Exchange and the Commission further
opportunity to evaluate whether such fees are appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered
the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds good cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of
the Act,\12\ for approving the proposed rule change prior to the
thirtieth day after publication of notice thereof in the Federal
Register. The Commission believes that granting accelerated approval of
the proposed rule change will preserve the Exchange's existing pilot
program for Linkage fees without interruption as the Exchange and the
Commission further considers the appropriateness of Linkage fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\13\ that the proposed rule change (SR-Phlx-2006-44) is hereby
approved on an accelerated basis for a pilot period to expire on July
31, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-12522 Filed 8-2-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 118 (Monday, June 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35871-35872]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15255]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC11-519-000]

Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-519); Comment
Request; Extension

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of proposed information collection and request for
comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of section 3506(c)(2)(A)
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A) (2006),
(Pub. L. 104-13), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission
or FERC) is soliciting public comment on the proposed information
collection activities described below.

DATES: Comments in consideration of the collection of information are
due August 19, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be filed either electronically (eFiled) or in
paper format, and should refer to Docket No. IC11-519-000. Documents
must be prepared in an acceptable filing format and in compliance with
Commission submission guidelines at http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp. eFiling instructions are available at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. First time users must follow
eRegister instructions at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/eregistration.asp, to establish a user name and password before
eFiling. The Commission will send an automatic acknowledgement to the
sender's e-mail address upon receipt of eFiled comments. Commenters
making an eFiling should not make a paper filing. Commenters that are
not able to file electronically must send an original of their comments
to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    Users interested in receiving automatic notification of activity in
this docket may do so through eSubscription at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp. All comments and FERC issuances may be
viewed, printed or downloaded remotely through FERC's eLibrary at
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp, by searching on Docket
No. IC11-519. For user assistance, contact FERC Online Support by e-
mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by phone at:<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll-free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> for TTY.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by e-mail
at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, and fax at
(202) 273-0873.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Description

    The FERC-519, ``Application under Federal Power Act section 203,''
OMB Control No. 1902-0082, is necessary to enable the Commission to
carry out its responsibilities in implementing the statutory provisions
of section 203 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824b. Section
203 authorizes the Commission to grant approval of transactions in
which a public utility disposes of jurisdictional facilities, merges
such facilities with the facilities owned by another person or acquires
the securities of another public utility. Under this statute, the
Commission must find that the proposed transaction will be consistent
with the public interest.
    Under section 203 of the FPA, FERC must review proposed mergers,
acquisitions and dispositions of jurisdictional facilities by public
utilities, if the value of the facilities exceeds $10 million, and must
approve these transactions if they are consistent with the public
interest. One of FERC's overarching goals is to promote competition in
wholesale power markets, having determined that effective competition,
as opposed to traditional forms of price regulation, can best protect
the interests of ratepayers. Market power, however, can be exercised to
the detriment of effective competition and customers, making it
necessary for FERC to review and approve or disapprove all
jurisdictional mergers, dispositions and acquisitions. The Commission
implements these filing requirements in the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) under 18 CFR part 33.
    Action: The Commission is requesting a three-year extension of the
current expiration date with no changes to the current reporting
requirements.
    Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this collection is
estimated as:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Number of        Average burden
              Number of responses annually                 responses per        hours per         Total annual
                                                             respondent          response         burden hours
(1)                                                                   (2)                (3)    (1) x (2) x (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
112....................................................                 1                395             44,240
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The estimated total cost to respondents is $3,028,143 [44,240
hours/2,080 hours \1\ per year, times $142,372 \2\ equals $3,028,143].
The cost per respondent annually is $27,037. This is a decrease from
134 to currently an average of 112 filings annually. The Commission
considers this a normal fluctuation due to market activities and filing
times chosen. Utilities file periodically; therefore the number of
filings is expected to continue to fluctuate from year-to-year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Number of hours an employee works each year.
    \2\ Average annual salary per employee (including overhead).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The reporting burden includes the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide
the information including: (1) Reviewing instructions; (2) developing,
acquiring, installing, using technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, verifying, processing, maintaining, disclosing
and providing information; (3) adjusting the existing ways to comply
with any previously applicable filing instructions and requirements;
(4) training personnel to respond to this collection of information;
(5) searching data sources; (6) completing and reviewing the collection
of information; and (7) transmitting, or otherwise disclosing the
information.
    The cost estimate for respondents is based upon salaries for
professional and clerical support, as well as direct and indirect
overhead costs. Direct costs include all costs directly attributable to
providing this information, such as administrative costs and the cost
for information technology. Indirect or overhead costs are costs
incurred by an organization in support of its mission. These costs
apply to activities which benefit the whole organization rather than
any one particular function or activity.
    Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology e.g. permitting electronic submission of
responses.

    Dated: June 14, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-15255 Filed 6-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P