			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on May 17, 2007

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2006-26737

________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Joint Application of AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. (AMERICAN)  and MALÉV
HUNGARIAN AIRLINES (MALÉV) filed 12/22/06 , and supplemented on 3/23/07
for:

XX   Exemption for American for two years under 49 U.S.C. 40109 to
provide the following services:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail (1)
between points in Hungary,

(2) between points in Hungary and points in the United States, and (3)
between points in Hungary and points in third countries (either nonstop
or via intermediate points), and the right to integrate this authority
with its existing exemption and certificate authority.  American seeks
this authority to display its designator code on flights operated by
Malév.

XX   Exemption for Malév for two years under 49 U.S.C. 40109 to provide
the following services:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail (1)
between points in the United States, (2) between points in the United
States and points in Hungary, and (3) between points in the United
States and points in third countries (either nonstop or via intermediate
points in third countries), and the right to integrate this authority
with its existing foreign air carrier permits and exemptions.  Malév
seeks this authority to display its designator code on flights operated
by American.

XX   Statement of authorization for blanket code-share authority for
American under 14 CFR Part 212 to:

Display Malév’s “MA*” designator code in conjunction with foreign
air transportation on flights operated by American (or its affiliates)
(1) between points in the United States, (2) between points in the
United States and points in Hungary, and (3) between points in the
United States and points in third countries (either nonstop or via
intermediate points in third countries).

XX   Statement of authorization for blanket code-share authority for
Malév under 14 CFR Part 212 to:

Display American’s “AA” designator code in conjunction with
foreign air transportation on flights operated by Malév (1) between
points in Hungary, (2) between points in Hungary and points in the
United States (either nonstop or via intermediate points in third
countries), and (3) between points in Hungary and points in third
countries (either nonstop or via intermediate points).

Applicant reps: Carl B. Nelson<PHONE_NUMBER> (American) DOT Analyst:
Thuy H. Cooper<PHONE_NUMBER>

	           Stephen J. Fearon<PHONE_NUMBER> (Malév)

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX  Granted request of American for exemption authority to serve between
points in the United States and Budapest and the intermediate/beyond
points Frankfurt and Zurich (subject to conditions, see below; see also
decision below)

XX  Dismissed, as moot, request of American for broad exemption
authority to serve between points in the United States and Hungary via
intermediate/beyond points effective March 30, 2008

XX  Granted request of Malév for exemption authority to serve between
points in Hungary and Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York and the
intermediate/beyond points Rome and Zurich (subject to conditions, see
below; see also decision below)

XX  Granted request of Malév for broad exemption authority to serve
between points in the United States and Hungary via intermediate/beyond
points effective March 30, 2008 (subject to conditions, see below; see
also decision below)

XX  Granted requests of American Eagle Airlines, Inc. and Executive
Airlines, Inc. d/b/a American Eagle for route integration (subject to
conditions, see below)

XX  Dismissed requests of American and Malév for route integration

XX  Granted request of American for blanket statement of authorization
(subject to conditions, see below; see also decision below)

XX  Granted request of Malév for blanket statement of authorization
limited to operations conducted by Malév using its own aircraft and
crews  (We deferred action on Malév’s request to conduct these
code-share operations by wet lease.) (subject to conditions, see below;
see also decision and remarks, below)

The above action granting point-specific exemption authority to American
was effective when taken:

May 17, 2007, through May 17, 2009.

The above action granting point-specific exemption authority to Malév
was effective when taken:

May 17, 2007, through May 17, 2009.  The broader exemption authority
granted to Malév will take effect March 30, 2008 and will remain
effective through May 17, 2009.

The above action granting blanket statement of authorization to American
was effective when taken:

May 17, 2007 and will remain in effect indefinitely, subject to the
conditions below.  (See decision below.)

The above action granting blanket statement of authorization to Malév
to operate using its own aircraft and crews was effective when taken:
May 17, 2007 and will remain in effect indefinitely, subject to the
conditions below.  (See decision below.)

The above action deferring action on Malév’s request for blanket
statement of authorization for wet lease service was effective when
taken: May 17, 2007.  (See remarks below.)

The above actions granting route integration authority to American Eagle
Airlines, Inc. and Executive Airlines, Inc. d/b/a American Eagle were
effective when taken: May 17, 2007, through May 17, 2009.

The above actions dismissing the requests of American for broad
exemption authority and route integration authority and the request of
Malév for route integration were effective when taken: May 17, 2007.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

XX   The point-specific authority granted and effective immediately is
consistent with the aviation agreement between the United States and
Hungary.  The broad authority granted and effective March 30, 2008 is
consistent with the aviation agreement between the United States and the
European Union that will be provisionally applied beginning on that
date.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations

indicated:    XX  American’s certificates of public convenience and
necessity

	XX  Malév’s foreign air carrier permit

	      XX  Standard U.S. Carrier Exemption Conditions (attached as
Appendix D)

	      XX  Standard Foreign Carrier Exemption Conditions (attached as
Appendix E)

	      XX  Conditions for Statements of Authorization (see below)

Responsive Pleadings: On January 8, 2007, United Air Lines, Inc.
(United) filed an answer to American's and Malév’s joint application.
 United states that it does not object to American's and Malév’s
request for approval of their code-share arrangement.  However, United
asserts that several services to points beyond Hungary are inconsistent
with applicable international agreements or with U.S. policies.  United
states that it questions the propriety of notices of code-share services
by American and Malév whenever American’s designator code would be
displayed on Malév-operated flights in some of these markets.
Specifically, United notes that Beirut and Damascus are two points where
U.S. carrier operations are prohibited for safety or security reasons.
United also notes that the Department should not approve the
code-sharing services to cities such as Athens and Thessaloniki, Greece;
Cairo, Egypt; Moscow, Russia; and Odessa, Ukraine because under existing
limits United is unable to exercise or expand its code-share rights to
points in these countries.

On January 10, 2007, American and Malév filed a joint reply stating
that the intent of the initial notice submitted was to give the carriers
the flexibility to implement all of American's and Malév’s proposed
code-share services consistent with applicable international agreements
and other restrictions as soon as any issues can be resolved.  The
carriers recognize that certain of their proposed services cannot
immediately be operated, but American and Malév wished to clear the
requirement of code-share notice so that it would not be an impediment
to implementation.  In the interest of removing any cause for delay in
approval of the application, American and Malév withdrew initial notice
of American’s designator code on flights operated by Malév beyond
Budapest to the following cities: Beirut, Damascus, Cairo, and Odessa.
American maintains its notice with respect to the remainder of the
cities that United questioned in its answer.

On March 23, 2007, American and Malév filed a supplement to their
application requesting that their pending application be processed as if
the United States and European Union (E.U.) air transport agreement were
already in effect, and that the two carriers be granted broad
code-sharing authority on an extra-bilateral basis until March 2008.
American and Malév state that if the Department determines to strictly
enforce the

U.S.-Hungary bilateral agreement until March 30, 2008, and to reject any
extra-bilateral requests, American and Malév name the following
intermediate points for U.S.-Hungary code-share service: (1) American:
Brussels, Frankfurt, London (Gatwick), Paris, Rome, and Zurich and (2)
Malév: Brussels, Paris, Rome, Zurich, and Toronto.

Decision:  We have decided to grant American and Malév the authority
that is available under the currently effective U.S.-Hungary air
transport agreement.  We are not granting extra-bilateral rights.
Accordingly, we grant American’s request for exemption authority for
the following: between points in the United States and Budapest and the
intermediate/beyond points Frankfurt and Zurich.  Similarly, we are
granting for immediate effectiveness, Malév’s request for exemption
authority to serve between points in Hungary and Chicago, Los Angeles
and New York and the intermediate/beyond points Rome and Zurich.

As to the broader aspects of the American and Malév requests, we note
that on April 30, 2007, the U.S.-E.U. air transport agreement was
signed, and that it will be provisionally applied beginning March 30,
2008.  American holds an open-skies certificate allowing it to serve any
open-skies countries where an open-skies agreement is being applied.
Accordingly, American will be able to serve, on an unrestricted basis,
points in the European Union as of that date and needs no further
authority here as to such points.   The balance of the authority it
seeks is covered by the certificate.  The broad exemption authority that
Malév seeks we are granting here, but for effectiveness March 30, 2008.

We have granted both American and Malév blanket statements of
authorization, subject to our standard

30-day notice requirement.  Although we are granting them blanket
statements of authorization, the points served under this authority
prior to March 30, 2008, must be consistent with the U.S.-Hungary
bilateral agreement and with the carriers' underlying economic authority
(which during this period will remain limited).  Points meeting these
criteria and for which they provided notice are listed in Appendix B.
When the U.S.-E.U. air transport agreement is applied (March 30, 2008),
code-share services may include additional points, including additional
intermediate/beyond points (see Appendix C).

Conditions:  The statements of authorization granted are subject to the
following conditions:

(a)  The statements of authorization will remain in effect only as long
as (i) American and Malév continue to hold the necessary underlying
authority to operate the code-share services at issue, and (ii) the
code-share agreement providing for the code-share operations remains in
effect.

(b)  American and/or Malév must promptly notify the Department (Office
of International Aviation) if the code-share agreement providing for the
code-share operations is no longer effective or if the carriers decide
to cease operating all or a portion of the approved code-share services.
 Such notices should be filed in Docket OST-2006-26737.

(c)  American and/or Malév must notify the Department no later than 30
days before they begin any new code-share service under the code-share
services authorized here.  Such notice shall identify the market(s) to
be served, which carrier will be operating the aircraft in the
code-share market added, and the date on which the service will begin.
Such notices should be filed in Docket

	OST-2006-26737.

(d)  The code-sharing operations conducted under this authority must
comply with 14 CFR 257 and with any amendments to the Department’s
regulations concerning code-share arrangements that may be adopted.
Notwithstanding any provisions in the contract between the carriers, our
approval here is expressly conditioned upon the requirements that the
subject foreign air transportation be sold in the name of the carrier
holding out such service in the computer reservation systems and
elsewhere; that the carrier selling such transportation (i.e., the
carrier shown on the ticket) accept responsibility for the entirety of
the code-share journey for all obligations established in its contract
of carriage with the passenger; that the passenger liability of the
operating carrier be unaffected; and that the operating carrier shall
not permit the code of its U.S. code-sharing partner to be carried on
any flight that enters, departs, or transits the airspace of any area
for whose airspace the Federal Aviation Administration has issued a
flight prohibition.

(e)  Any service provided shall be consistent with all applicable
agreements between the United States and Hungary, and all applicable
agreements with other foreign countries involved.  Furthermore,

(i) nothing in the award of this blanket statement of authorization
should be construed as conferring upon American’s rights (including
code-share, fifth-freedom intermediate and/or beyond rights) to serve
markets where U.S. carrier rights are limited unless American notifies
us of its intent to serve such market and unless and until the
Department has completed any necessary carrier selection procedures to
determine which carrier(s) should be authorized to exercise such rights;
and

(ii) should there be a request by any carrier to use the limited-entry
route rights that are included in American’s authority by virtue of
the blanket statement of authorization granted here, but that are not
being used by American, the holding of such authority will not be
considered as providing any preference for American in a carrier
selection proceeding to determine which carrier(s) should be entitled to
use the authority at issue.

(f)  The authority granted here is specifically conditioned so that
neither American nor Malév shall give any force or effect to any
contractual provisions between themselves that are contrary to these
conditions.

The route integration authority granted here is subject to the condition
that any service provided under this exemption shall be consistent with
all applicable agreements between the United States and the foreign
countries involved.  Furthermore, (a) nothing in the award of the route
integration authority requested should be construed as conferring upon
American Eagle Airlines, Inc. or Executive Airlines, Inc. d/b/a American
Eagle rights (including fifth-freedom intermediate and/or beyond rights)
to serve markets where U.S. carrier entry is limited unless the carrier
wishing to serve such a market (American Eagle Airlines, Inc. or
Executive Airlines, Inc. d/b/a American Eagle, as the case may be),
notifies the Department of its intent to serve such a market and unless
and until the Department has completed any necessary carrier selection
procedures to determine which carrier(s) should be authorized to
exercise such rights; and (b) should there be a request by any carrier
to use the limited-entry route rights that are included in American
Eagle Airlines, Inc. or Executive Airlines, Inc. d/b/a American
Eagle’s authority by virtue of the route integration exemption granted
here, but that are not then being used by American Eagle Airlines, Inc.
or Executive Airlines, Inc. d/b/a American Eagle, the holding of such
authority by route integration will not be considered as providing any
preference for American Eagle Airlines, Inc. or Executive Airlines, Inc.
d/b/a American Eagle in a competitive carrier selection proceeding to
determine which carrier(s) should be entitled to use the authority at
issue.

Remarks: We note that the joint applicants state that the
Budapest-Zagreb, Budapest-Cluj-Napoca, and Budapest-Ljubljana routes may
be operated by Malév with aircraft wet leased from Moldavian Airways
and/or Carpatair.  We are deferring action on this portion of the
request until (1) Moldavian Airways and/or Carpatair receive exemption
authority and related statements of authorization to display the
American designator code on flights operated by either carrier in the
subject markets and (2) American conducts a safety audit of the two
foreign carriers under the Department’s Code-Share Safety Audit
Program, and the FAA has advised that it has reviewed the relevant audit
and found it to be acceptable.

We note that American has conducted a safety audit of Malév under the
Department’s Code-Share Safety Audit Program, and the FAA has advised
that it has reviewed the relevant audit and found it to be acceptable.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department’s regulations, we found the applicants qualified to provide
the services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted or dismissed, we denied all requests in the
referenced Dockets.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

Appendix A

CODE-SHARE ROUTES

Any Route between AA’s North American Gateways at New York (JFK) and
Toronto and the Following Point(s)

City				Country				Operating Carrier

Budapest (BUD)		Hungary				MA

Any Route between AA’s European Gateways at Brussels, Paris, Dublin,
Frankfurt, London, Madrid, Zurich and Toronto and the Following Point(s)

City				Country				Operating Carrier

Budapest (BUD)		Hungary				MA

Any Route between Budapest and the Following Point(s)

City				Country				Operating Carrier

Tirana (TIA)			Albania					MA

Sarajevo (SJJ)			Bosnia Herzegovina			MA

Sofia (SOF)			Bulgaria				MA

Varna (VAR)			Bulgaria				MA

Dubrovnik (DBV)		Croatia					MA

Split (SPU)			Croatia					MA

Zagreb (ZAG)			Croatia					MA*

Athens (ATH)			Greece					MA

Thessaloniki (SKG)		Greece					MA

Skopje (SKP)			Macedonia				MA

Krakow (KRK)		Poland					MA

Bucharest (OTP)		Romania				MA

Cluj-Napoca (CLJ)		Romania				MA*

Constanta (CND)		Romania				MA

Timisoara (TSR)		Romania				MA

Tirgu Mures (TGM)		Romania				MA

Moscow (SVO)		Russia					MA

Ljubljana (LJU)		Slovenia				MA*

Istanbul (IST)			Turkey					MA

Pristina (PRN)			Serbia					MA

* Routes may be operated by Malév with aircraft wetleased from
Moldavian Airlines and/or Carpatair.

Any Route between MA’s North American Gateways at New York (JFK) and
Toronto and the Following Point(s)

City				Country				Operating Carrier

Halifax (YHZ)			Canada				AA

Montreal (YUL)		Canada				AA

Toronto (YYZ)		Canada				AA

Punta Canta (PUJ)		Dominican Republic			AA

Santiago Do (STI)		Dominican Republic			AA

Santo Domingo (SDQ)	Dominican Republic			AA

Montego Bay (MBJ)		Jamaica				AA

San Juan (SJU)		Puerto Rico				AA

Providenciales (PLS)		Turks and Caicos Islands		AA

Baltimore/Washington (BWI)	USA					AA

Boston/Logan (BOS)		USA					AA

Chicago (ORD)		USA					AA

Cleveland/Hopkins (CLE)	USA					AA

Dallas/Ft. Worth (DFW)	USA					AA

Fort Lauderdale (FLL)	USA					AA

Houston/Bush (IAH)		USA					AA

Los Angeles (LAX)		USA					AA

Miami (MIA)			USA 					AA

Minneapolis/St. Pauk (MSP)	USA					AA

New York/Kennedy (JFK)	USA					AA

New York/LaGuardia (LGA)	USA					AA

Orlando (MCO)		USA					AA

Raleigh/Durham (RDU)	USA					AA

San Antonio (SAT)		USA					AA

San Diego/Lindbergh (SAN)	USA					AA

San Francisco (SFO)		USA					AA

Seattle (SEA)			USA					AA

St. Louis (STL)		USA					AA

Washington/Reagan (DCA)	USA					AA

Caracas (CCS)			Venezuela				AA

St. Thomas (STT)		USA					AA

Any Route between MA’s European Gateways at Brussels, Paris, Dublin,
Frankfurt, London, Madrid, and Zurich and the Following Point(s)

City				Country				Operating Carrier

Chicago (ORD)		USA					AA

Dallas/Ft. Worth (DFW)	USA					AA

Miami (MIA)			USA 					AA

New York/Kennedy (JFK)	USA					AA

Raleigh/Durham (RDU)	USA					AA

Appendix B

CODE-SHARE ROUTES

(Effective Immediately)

Any Route between AA’s North American Gateway at New York (JFK) and
the Following Point(s)

City				Country				Operating Carrier

Budapest (BUD)		Hungary				MA

Any Route between AA’s European Gateways at Frankfurt and Zurich and
the Following Point(s)

City				Country				Operating Carrier

Budapest (BUD)		Hungary				MA

Any Route between MA’s North American Gateways at New York (JFK) and
the Following Point(s)

City				Country				Operating Carrier

Chicago (ORD)		USA					AA

Los Angeles (LAX)		USA					AA

New York/Kennedy (JFK)	USA					AA

New York/LaGuardia (LGA)	USA					AA

Any Route between MA’s European Gateways at Zurich and the Following
Point(s)

City				Country				Operating Carrier

Chicago (ORD)		USA					AA

New York/Kennedy (JFK)	USA					AA

Appendix C

CODE-SHARE ROUTES

(Effective March 30, 2008)

Any Route between AA’s North American Gateway at Toronto and the
Following Point(s)

City				Country				Operating Carrier

Budapest (BUD)		Hungary				MA

Any Route between AA’s European Gateways at Brussels, Paris, Dublin,
London, Madrid, Rome, and Toronto and the Following Point(s)

City				Country				Operating Carrier

Budapest (BUD)		Hungary				MA

Any Route between Budapest and the Following Point(s)

City				Country				Operating Carrier

Tirana (TIA)			Albania				MA

Sarajevo (SJJ)			Bosnia Herzegovina			MA

Sofia (SOF)			Bulgaria				MA

Varna (VAR)			Bulgaria				MA

Dubrovnik (DBV)		Croatia					MA

Split (SPU)			Croatia					MA

Zagreb (ZAG)			Croatia					MA*

Athens (ATH)			Greece					MA

Thessaloniki (SKG)		Greece					MA

Skopje (SKP)			Macedonia				MA

Krakow (KRK)		Poland					MA

Bucharest (OTP)		Romania				MA

Cluj-Napoca (CLJ)		Romania				MA*

Constanta (CND)		Romania				MA

Timisoara (TSR)		Romania				MA

Tirgu Mures (TGM)		Romania				MA

Ljubljana (LJU)		Slovenia				MA*

Istanbul (IST)			Turkey					MA

Pristina (PRN)			Serbia					MA

* Routes may be operated by Malév with aircraft wetleased from
Moldavian Airlines and/or Carpatair.  We are deferring action with
regards to the code-share operations via the wet lease from Moldavian
Airlines and/or Carpatair until (1) Moldavian Airways and/or Carpatair
receive exemption authority and related statements of authorization to
display the American designator code on flights operated by either
carrier in the subject markets and (2) American conducts a safety audit
of the two foreign carriers under the Department’s Code-Share Safety
Audit Program, and the FAA has advised that it has reviewed the relevant
audit and found it to be acceptable.

Any Route between MA’s North American Gateways at New York (JFK) and
Toronto and the Following Point(s)

City				Country				Operating Carrier

Halifax (YHZ)			Canada				AA

Montreal (YUL)		Canada				AA

Toronto (YYZ)		Canada				AA

Punta Canta (PUJ)		Dominican Republic			AA

Santiago Do (STI)		Dominican Republic			AA

Santo Domingo (SDQ)	Dominican Republic			AA

Montego Bay (MBJ)		Jamaica				AA

San Juan (SJU)		USA					AA

Providenciales (PLS)		Turks and Caicos Islands		AA

Baltimore/Washington (BWI)	USA					AA

Boston/Logan (BOS)		USA					AA

Chicago (ORD)		USA					AA

Cleveland/Hopkins (CLE)	USA					AA

Dallas/Ft. Worth (DFW)	USA					AA

Fort Lauderdale (FLL)	USA					AA

Houston/Bush (IAH)		USA					AA

Los Angeles (LAX)		USA					AA

Miami (MIA)			USA 					AA

Minneapolis/St. Pauk (MSP)	USA					AA

New York/Kennedy (JFK)	USA					AA

New York/LaGuardia (LGA)	USA					AA

Orlando (MCO)		USA					AA

Raleigh/Durham (RDU)	USA					AA

San Antonio (SAT)		USA					AA

San Diego/Lindbergh (SAN)	USA					AA

San Francisco (SFO)		USA					AA

Seattle (SEA)			USA					AA

St. Louis (STL)		USA					AA

Washington/Reagan (DCA)	USA					AA

Caracas (CCS)			Venezuela				AA

St. Thomas (STT)		USA					AA

Any Route between MA’s European Gateways at Brussels, Paris, Dublin,
Frankfurt, London, Madrid, Rome, and Zurich and the Following Point(s)

City				Country				Operating Carrier

Chicago (ORD)		USA					AA

Dallas/Ft. Worth (DFW)	USA					AA

Miami (MIA)			USA 					AA

New York/Kennedy (JFK)	USA					AA

Raleigh/Durham (RDU)	USA					AA										Appendix D

U.S. Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the U.S. carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2)  Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3)  Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4)  Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration, the Transportation Security Administration, and with all
applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning security, including,
but not limited to, 49 CFR Part 1544.  To assure compliance with all
applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning security, the holder
shall, before commencing any new service (including charter flights) to
or from a foreign airport, contact its International Principal Security
Inspector (IPSI) to advise the IPSI of its plans and to find out whether
the Transportation Security Administration has determined that security
is adequate to allow such airport(s) to be served;

(7)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations
of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the
United States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.

11/2006

Appendix E

Foreign Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the foreign carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Not conduct any operations unless it holds a currently effective
authorization from its homeland for such operations, and it has filed a
copy of such authorization with the Department;

(2)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration, the Transportation Security Administration, and with all
applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning security, including,
but not limited to, 14 CFR Parts 129, 91, and 36 and 49 CFR Part 1546 or
1550, as applicable.  To assure compliance with all applicable U.S.
Government requirements concerning security, the holder shall, before
commencing any new service (including charter flights) from a foreign
airport that would be the holder’s last point of departure for the
United States, contact its International Principal Security Inspector
(IPSI) to advise the IPSI of its plans and to find out whether the
Transportation Security Administration has determined that security is
adequate to allow such airport(s) to be served;

(3)  Comply with the requirements for minimum insurance coverage
contained in 14 CFR Part 205, and, prior to the commencement of any
operations under this authority, file evidence of such coverage, in the
form of a completed OST Form 6411, with the Federal Aviation
Administration’s Program Management Branch (AFS-260), Flight Standards
Service (any changes to, or termination of, insurance also shall be
filed with that office);

(4)  Not operate aircraft under this authority unless it complies with
operational safety requirements at least equivalent to Annex 6 of the
Chicago Convention;

(5)  Conform to the airworthiness and airman competency requirements of
its Government for international air services;

(6)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 203,
concerning waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(7)  Agree that operations under this authority constitute a waiver of
sovereign immunity, for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1605(a), but only with
respect to those actions or proceedings instituted against it in any
court or other tribunal in the United States that are: (a)  based on its
operations in international air transportation that, according to the
contract of carriage, include a point in the United States as a point of
origin, point of destination, or agreed stopping place, or for which the
contract of carriage was purchased in the United States; or (b)  based
on a claim under any international agreement or treaty cognizable in any
court or other tribunal of the United States.  In this condition, the
term "international air transportation" means "international
transportation" as defined by the Warsaw Convention, except that all
States shall be considered to be High Contracting Parties for the
purpose of this definition;

(8)  Except as specifically authorized by the Department, originate or
terminate all flights to/from the United States in its homeland;

(9)  Comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 217, concerning the
reporting of scheduled, nonscheduled, and charter data;

(10) If charter operations are authorized, except as otherwise provided
in the applicable aviation agreement, comply with the Department's rules
governing charters (including 14 CFR Parts 212 and 380); and

(11) Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department, with all applicable orders or regulations of other U.S.
agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the United States.

This authority shall not be effective during any period when the holder
is not in compliance with the conditions imposed above.  Moreover, this
authority cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without explicit
Department approval under Title 49 of the U.S. Code.

11/2006

 The joint applicants include American affiliates American Eagle
Airlines, Inc. and Executive Airlines, Inc. d/b/a American Eagle.

 The code-share partners provided a listing of specific code-share
markets that they intend initially to serve under this arrangement.  We
have reproduced it as Appendix A of this Notice.  See decision below.

 See fn. 2.

 We have dismissed, as moot, American’s request for broader exemption
authority, as the carrier will hold broad authority to serve Hungary
pursuant to its blanket open-skies certificate authority.  See Order
2007-4-2.

 By Order 2006-1-1, the Department awarded American a blanket route
integration certificate.

 As a standard practice, the Department does not grant route integration
to foreign carriers; therefore we are dismissing Malév’s request for
route integration.

 Under the U.S.-Hungary air transport agreement, the United States may
select seven intermediate/beyond points in Europe and/or Canada.   The
U.S. initially selected Zurich, Frankfurt, Vienna, Bucharest, and
Dubrovnik and subsequently selected Amsterdam and Cologne.  The U.S. has
no additional selections; therefore, we are unable, consistent with the
bilateral agreement, to grant American’s request for Brussels, London
(Gatwick), Paris, and Rome.

 Under the U.S.-Hungary air transport agreement, the Government of
Hungary may select five intermediate/beyond points in Europe and/or
Canada.  The Government of Hungary initially selected Frankfurt and
Zurich and subsequently selected Rome.  The Government of Hungary,
therefore, may select two additional points but they have not done so.
Under these circumstances, we are unable, consistent with the bilateral
agreement, to grant Malev’s request for Brussels, Paris, and Toronto.

 DOT’s list of open-skies partners covered by blanket open-skies
certificates is at:   HYPERLINK
"http://ostpxweb.dot.gov/aviation/international/agreementsbeingapplied.h
tm"
http://ostpxweb.dot.gov/aviation/international/agreementsbeingapplied.ht
m .  Hungary is included on the list but with the caveat that the
certificate holder may not commence service to Hungary under the
certificate before March 30, 2008.

 This includes exemption and code-share authority to serve the
intermediate/beyond points of Brussels, London (Gatwick), Paris, and
Rome.

 This includes exemption and code-share authority to serve the
intermediate/beyond points of Brussels, Paris, and Toronto.

 We note United’s objections with regards to Moscow, Athens, and
Thessaloniki.  We are disapproving the joint applicants’ notice with
respect to Moscow.  Third-country code-share opportunities will be
discussed at the upcoming civil aviation negotiations with the Russian
Federation.  With regards to Athens and Thessaloniki, the authority to
serve these points will become effective March 30, 2008.  We note that
United has the authority to serve these same points (see 30-day notice
of United and Lufthansa, undocketed, dated September 30, 1998).

 We expect this notification to be received within 10 days of such
non-effectiveness or of such decision.

 The notice referenced in condition (c) above may be used for this
notification.


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 161 (Monday, August 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51407-51408]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18047]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER22-2664-000]

Aron Energy Prepay 16 LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Aron

Energy Prepay 16 LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is September 6, 2022.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 16, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-18047 Filed 8-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36902]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13153]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 34615; File No. 813-00405]

Viking Global Equities II LP and Viking Global Investors LP

June 14, 2022.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'').

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice of application for an order (``Order'') under sections 6(b)
and 6(e) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') granting
an exemption from all provisions of the Act, except sections 9, 17, 30,
and 36 through 53, and the rules and regulations under the Act (the
``Rules and Regulations''). With respect to sections 17(a), (d), (e),
(f), (g), and (j) of the Act, sections 30(a), (b), (e), and (h) of the
Act and the Rules and Regulations and rule 38a-1 under the Act,
applicants request a limited exemption as set forth in the application.

SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants request an order to exempt certain
limited partnerships, limited liability companies, business trusts or
other entities (``Funds'') formed for the benefit of eligible employees
of Viking Global Investors LP and its affiliates from certain
provisions of the Act. Each Fund, and each series thereof with
segregated assets and liabilities, will be an ``employees' securities
company'' within the meaning of section 2(a)(13) of the Act.

APPLICANTS: Viking Global Equities II LP and Viking Global Investors
LP.

FILING DATES: The application was filed on January 28, 2022 and amended
on June 3, 2022.

HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing on any application by emailing
the SEC's Secretary at [email protected] and serving the
Applicants with a copy of the request by email, if an email address is
listed for the relevant Applicant below, or personally or by mail, if a
physical address is listed for the relevant Applicant below. Hearing
requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on July 11,
2022, and should be accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in
the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the
desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason for the request,
and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing
may request notification by emailing the Commission's Secretary at
[email protected].

ADDRESSES: The Commission: [email protected]. Applicants:
Andrew M. Genser, [email protected], and John J. Mahon,
[email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica D. Leonardo, Senior Counsel,
or Marc Mehrespand, Branch Chief, at<PHONE_NUMBER> (Division of
Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For Applicants' representations, legal
analysis, and conditions, please refer to Applicants' first amended and
restated application, dated June 3, 2022, which may be obtained via the
Commission's website by searching for the file number at the top of
this document, or for an Applicant using the Company name search field,
on the SEC's EDGAR system. The SEC's EDGAR system may be searched at,
at http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/legacy/companysearch.html. You
may also call the SEC's Public Reference Room at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-13153 Filed 6-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: April 9, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 67)]
[Notices]
[Page 17547-17548]
[DOCID:fr09ap07-69]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL07-52-000]

Louisiana Public Service Commission, Complainant, v. Entergy
Corporation; Entergy Services, Inc.; Entergy Louisiana, LLC; Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.; Entergy Mississippi, Inc.; Entergy New Orleans, Inc.;
Entergy Gulf States, Inc., Respondents; Notice of Complaint

April 3, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 3, 2007, Louisiana Public Service
Commission tendered for filing, pursuant to Rule 206 of the Rules of
Practice and Procedure of the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission
(Commission) and section 206 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824e,
seeks revisions to the Entergy System Agreement Service Schedule MSS-3
because that Service Schedule is unjust, unreasonable, unduly
discriminatory and conflicts with principles established in prior
decisions of the Commission.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.

    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 30, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-6560 Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: June 20, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 120)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 35095-35098]
[DOCID:fr20jn08-17]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0643; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-094-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional
Jet Series 100 and 440) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    Bombardier Aerospace has completed a system safety review of the
aircraft fuel system against fuel tank safety standards * * *.
    [A]ssessment showed that supplemental maintenance tasks [for
certain bonding jumpers, wiring harnesses, and hydraulic systems,
among other items] are required to prevent potential ignition
sources inside the fuel system, which could result in a fuel tank
explosion. * * *

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 21, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rocco Viselli, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart

Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0643;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-094-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On February 28, 2008, we issued AD 2008-06-02, Amendment 39-15414
(73 FR 13100, March 12, 2008). That AD required actions intended to
address an unsafe condition on the products listed above.
    Since we issued AD 2008-06-02, we have determined that, for certain
airplanes, the initial compliance times for doing the tasks specified
in paragraph (f)(1) of that AD must be reduced. AD 2008-06-02 resulted
from Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2007-29, dated November 22,
2007 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI'').
    The MCAI does not provide an initial compliance time for doing the
tasks for certain airplanes. In AD 2008-06-02, for those airplanes, we
required an initial compliance time that started from the effective
date of the AD, or the date of issuance of the original Canadian
standard airworthiness certificate or the date of issuance of the
original Canadian export certificate of airworthiness, whichever occurs
later. Although the initial compliance time for doing the tasks is
unstated in the MCAI, we have determined that the intent of the MCAI is
for the initial compliance time to start from the initial delivery date
of the airplane in order to address the identified unsafe condition in
a timely manner.
    This proposed AD would require reduced thresholds for the initial
compliance times for the airplanes and tasks that are not identified in
paragraphs (f)(2), (f)(3), and (f)(4) of AD 2008-06-02. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 689 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $55,120, or $80 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15414 (73 FR
13100, March 12, 2008) and adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly Canadair): Docket No. FAA-2008-0643;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-094-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by July 21, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) The proposed AD supersedes AD 2008-06-02, Amendment 39-
15414.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes, certificated in any
category, all serial numbers.

    Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance according
to paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. The request should include a
description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the airplane.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    Bombardier Aerospace has completed a system safety review of the
aircraft fuel system against fuel tank standards introduced in
Chapter 525 of the Airworthiness Manual through Notice of Proposed
Amendment (NPA) 2002-043. The identified non-compliances were then
assessed using Transport Canada Policy Letter No. 525-001, to
determine if mandatory corrective action is required.
    The assessment showed that supplemental maintenance tasks [for
certain bonding jumpers, wiring harnesses, and hydraulic systems,
among other items] are required to prevent potential ignition
sources inside the fuel system, which could result in a fuel tank
explosion. Revision has been made to Canadair Regional Jet Model CL-
600-2B19 Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP A-053, Part 2,
Appendix D, ``Fuel System Limitations'' to introduce the required
maintenance tasks.

The corrective action is revising the Airworthiness Limitations
Section (ALS) of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to
incorporate new limitations for fuel tank systems.

Restatement of Certain Requirements of AD 2008-06-02

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Within 60 days after April 16, 2008 (the effective date of
AD 2008-06-02), revise the Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS)
of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to incorporate the
inspection and maintenance requirements, as applicable, in Canadair
Regional Jet Model CL-600-2B19 Airworthiness Requirements in the
Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP A-053, Part 2, Appendix D,
``Fuel System Limitations,'' Revision 7, dated May 10, 2007 (``the
MRM''), task numbers 28-11-00-601, 28-11-00-602, 28-11-00-603, 28-
11-00-604, 29-33-01-601, and 29-33-01-602. Except as required by
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, for those task numbers, the initial
compliance times start at the applicable time specified in
paragraphs (f)(2), (f)(3), and (f)(4) of this AD, and the repetitive
inspections must be accomplished thereafter at the interval
specified in the MRM, except as provided by paragraphs (f)(5) and
(h)(1) of this AD. Accomplishing the revision in accordance with a
later revision of the MRM is an acceptable method of compliance if
the revision is approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA), or Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA) (or its delegated agent).
    (2) For airplanes having more than 15,000 flight hours as of
April 16, 2008, the initial compliance time for Tasks 28-11-00-601,
28-11-00-602, 28-11-00-603, and 28-11-00-604 is within 5,000 flight
hours after April 16, 2008. Thereafter, these tasks must be
accomplished within the repetitive interval specified in Canadair
Regional Jet Model CL-600-2B19, Airworthiness Requirements in the
Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP A-053, Part 2, Appendix D,
``Fuel System Limitations,'' Revision 7, dated May 10, 2007.
    (3) For Task 29-33-01-601, the initial compliance time is within
5,000 flight hours after April 16, 2008. Thereafter, task 29-33-01-
601 must be accomplished within the repetitive interval specified in
Canadair Regional Jet Model CL-600-2B19, Airworthiness Requirements
in the Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP A-053, Part 2, Appendix
D, ``Fuel System Limitations,'' Revision 7, dated May 10, 2007.
    (4) For airplanes having more than 27,500 flight hours as of
April 16, 2008, the initial compliance time for Task 29-33-01-602 is
within 2,500 flight hours after April 16, 2008. Thereafter, this
task must be accomplished within the repetitive interval specified
in Canadair Regional Jet Model CL-600-2B19, Airworthiness
Requirements in the Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP A-053, Part
2, Appendix D, ``Fuel System Limitations,'' Revision 7, dated May
10, 2007.
    (5) After accomplishing the actions specified in paragraphs
(f)(1), (f)(2), (f)(3), and (f)(4) of this AD, no alternative
inspections/limitation tasks or inspection/limitation task intervals
may be used unless the inspections/limitation tasks or inspection/
limitation task intervals are part of a later approved revision of
Canadair Regional Jet Model CL-600-2B19, Airworthiness Requirements
in the Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP A-053, Part 2, Appendix
D, ``Fuel System Limitations,'' Revision 7, dated May 10, 2007, that
is approved by the Manager, New York ACO, FAA, or TCCA (or its
delegated agent); or unless the inspection/limitation task or
inspection/limitation task interval is approved as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.

New Requirements of This AD: Actions and Compliance

    (g) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) At the times specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and
(g)(1)(ii) of this AD, as applicable, do the initial inspection for
Tasks 28-11-00-601, 28-11-00-602, 28-11-00-603, 28-11-00-604, and
29-33-01-602, as applicable, in the MRM, and thereafter repeat the
inspection at the applicable interval specified in the MRM, except
as provided by (g)(2) of this AD.
    (i) For airplanes not identified in paragraph (f)(2) of this AD,
the initial compliance time for Tasks 28-11-00-601, 28-11-00-602,
28-11-00-603, and 28-11-00-604 is before the accumulation of 20,000
total flight hours, or within 5,000 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
    (ii) For airplanes not identified in paragraph (f)(4) of this
AD, the initial compliance time for Task 29-33-01-602 is before the
accumulation of 30,000 total flight hours, or within 2,500 flight
hours after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
    (2) After accomplishing the actions specified in paragraphs
(g)(1)of this AD, no alternative inspections/limitation tasks or
inspection/limitation task intervals may be used unless the
inspections/limitation tasks or inspection/limitation task intervals
are part of a later approved revision of Canadair Regional Jet Model
CL-600-2B19, Airworthiness Requirements in the Maintenance
Requirements Manual, CSP A-053, Part 2, Appendix D, ``Fuel System
Limitations,'' Revision 7, dated May 10, 2007, that is approved by
the Manager, New York ACO, FAA, or TCCA (or its delegated agent); or
unless the inspection/limitation task or inspection/limitation task
interval is approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (h)(1) of
this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Rocco Viselli, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York
Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (516) 794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the
AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in
the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI,
your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required

to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (i) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2007-29,
dated November 22, 2007, and Canadair Regional Jet Model CL-600-
2B19, Airworthiness Requirements in the Maintenance Requirements
Manual, CSP A-053, Part 2, Appendix D, ``Fuel System Limitations,''
Revision 7, dated May 10, 2007; for related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 10, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-13922 Filed 6-19-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51270-51271]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18197]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

List of Applications Delayed More Than 180 Days

AGENCY: Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice, list of applications delayed more than 180 days.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c),
PHMSA is publishing the following list of special permit applications
that have been in process for 180 days or more. The reason(s) for delay
and the expected completion date for action on each application is
provided in association with each identified application.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Paquet, Director, Office of
Hazardous Materials Special Permits and Approvals, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
Southeast, Washington, DC 20590-0001,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Key to ``Reason for Delay''

1. Awaiting additional information from applicant
2. Extensive public comment under review
3. Application is technically complex and is of significant impact or
precedent-setting and requires extensive analysis
4. Staff review delayed by other priority issues or volume of special
permit applications

Meaning of Application Number Suffixes

N--New application
M--Modification request
R--Renewal Request
P--Party To Exemption Request

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 19, 2016.
Donald Burger,
Chief, General Approvals and Permits.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Reason for    Estimated date
  Application No.         Applicant            delay       of completion
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Modification to Special Permits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
13173-M...........  Luxfer Canada                      4      08-10-2016
                     Limited, Calgary,
                     AB.
13192-M...........  Thomas Gray &                      4      07-31-2016
                     Associates, Inc.,
                     Orange, CA.
15537-M...........  Alaska Pacific                     4      07-31-2016
                     Powder Company,
                     Watkins, CO.
7607-M............  Thermo Fisher                      4      07-31-2016
                     Scientific,
                     Franklin, MA.
15610-M...........  TechKnowServ Corp.,                4      07-31-2016
                     State College, PA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     New Special Permit Applications
------------------------------------------------------------------------
16615-N...........  Special Devices,                   4      07-31-2016
                     Incorporated, Simi
                     Valley, CA.
16559-N...........  HTEC Hydrogen                      4      07-30-2016
                     Technology & Energy
                     Corporation, North
                     Vancouver, BC
                     Canada.
16524-N...........  Quantum Fuel Systems               4      07-15-2016
                     Technologies
                     Worldwide, Inc.,
                     Lake Forest, CA.
15767-N...........  Union Pacific                      3      07-31-2016
                     Railroad Company,
                     Omaha, NE.
16620-N...........  Westeel Canada Inc.,               4      07-31-2016
                     Winnipeg, Canada.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Party to Special Permits Application
------------------------------------------------------------------------
12412-P...........  Seaco Technologies,                4      07-31-2016
                     Inc., Bakersfield,
                     CA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2016-18197 Filed 8-2-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-60-M


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 4, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 62532]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26297]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2018-0676; FRL-9986-65-Region 6]

Air Plan Approval; Texas; Emission Statements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a portion
of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of
Texas for the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS). The portion of the SIP revision being approved pertains to CAA
2008 ozone NAAQS requirement for emission statements in the Dallas/Fort
Worth ozone nonattainment area (DFW area).

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before January 3,
2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by EPA-R06-OAR-2018-0676,
at https://www.regulations.gov or via email to [email protected]. For additional information on how to submit
comments see the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the
direct final rule located in the rules section of this Federal
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Karolina Ruan Lei,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this Federal
Register, the EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this
action no further activity is contemplated. If the EPA receives
relevant adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and
all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final
rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second
comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: November 26, 2018.
Anne Idsal,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2018-26297 Filed 12-3-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14024-14025]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05129]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2022-0155]

Information Collection Request to Office of Management and
Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625-0122

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Sixty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting an extension of
its approval for the following collection of information: 1625-0122,
Cargo Securing Manuals; without change. Our ICR describes the
information we seek to collect from the public. Before submitting this
ICR to OIRA, the Coast Guard is inviting comments as described below.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before May 10, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG-2022-0155] to the Coast Guard using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public
participation and request for comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available
from: Commandant (CG-6P), ATTN: Paperwork Reduction Act Manager, U.S.
Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE, STOP 7710,
Washington, DC 20593-7710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.L. Craig, Office of Privacy
Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, for questions
on these documents.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an
application to OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a
Coast Guard collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains
information describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's
likely burden on the affected public, an explanation of the necessity
of the Collection, and other important information describing the
Collection. There is one ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be
granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical

utility of the Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of
the Collection; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of information subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the Collection on respondents, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
    In response to your comments, we may revise this ICR or decide not
to seek an extension of approval for the Collection. We will consider
all comments and material received during the comment period.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. Comments must contain the OMB Control Number of
the ICR and the docket number of this request, [USCG-2022-0155], and
must be received by May 10, 2022.

Submitting Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions. Documents mentioned in this notice, and all public
comments, are in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and
can be viewed by following that website's instructions. Additionally,
if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will
be notified when comments are posted.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and
submissions in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System
of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).

Information Collection Request

    Title: Cargo Securing Manuals.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0122.
    Summary: The information is used by the Coast Guard to review/
approve new or updated cargo securing manuals (CSM).
    Need: 46 U.S.C. 2103 and 3306 authorizes the Coast Guard to
establish these regulations. 33 CFR 97 prescribes the CSM regulations.
    Forms: None.
    Respondents: Owners, operators, and masters of certain cargo
vessels.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Hour Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has increased from 226
hours to 280 hours a year, due to an increase in the estimated annual
number CSM submissions.
    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter
35, as amended.

    Dated: March 7, 2022.
Kathleen Claffie,
Chief, Office of Privacy Management, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2022-05129 Filed 3-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:See attached file(s) Thank You  - Garry J. Flynn