[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 25, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58872-58874]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22978]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0823; Directorate Identifier 2013-CE-027-AD;
Amendment 39-17594; AD 2013-19-12]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; GA 8 Airvan (Pty) Ltd Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for GA 8
Airvan (Pty) Ltd Models GA8 and GA8-TC320 airplanes. This AD results
from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by
the aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an
unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as the fuel system integral sump tank does not meet FAA
regulations. We are issuing this AD to require actions to address the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective October 15, 2013.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of October 15,
2013.
    We must receive comments on this AD by November 12, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact GA 8 Airvan
(Pty) Ltd, c/o GippsAero Pty Ltd, Attn: Technical Services, P.O. Box
881, Morwell Victoria 3840, Australia; telephone: + 61 03 5172 1200;
fax: +61 03 5172 1201; Internet: http://www.gippsaero.com/customer-support/technical-publications.aspx. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), which is the aviation
authority for Australia, has issued AD No. AD/GA8/7, dated September 2,
2013 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    The GippsAero GA8 and GA8-TC 320 aircraft Mk II fuel system
features an integral sump tank located in the floor structure
forward of the co-pilot seat. The current configuration of the
compartments adjacent to the Mk II sump tank do not meet the
requirements of regulation 23.967(b) of the Federal Aviation
Regulations of the United States of America in that they are not
suitably ventilated and drained to prevent the accumulation of
flammable fluids or vapours.

    This AD requires modifying the fuel system for ventilation and
drainage. You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating it in Docket No. FAA-
2013-0823.

Relevant Service Information

    GippsAero has issued Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA8-2012-96,
Issue 4, dated August 12, 2013. The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in
the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all information provided by the State of Design Authority and
determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same type design.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because the
integral sump tank in the fuel system is not suitably ventilated and
drained to prevent the accumulation of flammable fluids or vapors,
which could lead to a flammability issue. Therefore, we determined that
notice and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are
impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment
effective in fewer than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0823; Directorate
Identifier 2013-CE-027-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 35 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 3 work-hours per product to do
the fuel system ventilation and drainage modification requirement of
this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators to be $8,925, or $255 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that it will take about 4 work-hours per
product to do the cargo pod modification. The average labor rate is $85
per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $1,000 per product, for
a cost of $1,340 per product. We have no way of determining the number
of products that may need this action.
    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2013-19-12 GA 8 Airvan (Pty) Ltd: Amendment 39-17594; Docket No.
FAA-2013-0823; Directorate Identifier 2013-CE-027-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective October 15,
2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the following GA 8 Airvan (Pty) Ltd model and
serial number airplane presented in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2)
that are certificated in any category:
    (1) Models GA8 airplanes, serial numbers GA8-02-012, GA8-TC 320-
02-16, GA8-TC 320-03-25, and GA8-TC 320-09-120.
    (2) Models GA8 and GA8-TC320, serial numbers GA8-08-128 through
GA8A/GA8-TC 320-13-205. The last three digits (third tier
designation) of the serial numbers are sequential regardless of the
model designation (first tier designation) or the year produced
(second tier designation).

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 21: Fuel System.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by the aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as the fuel system
integral sump tank does not meet FAA regulations. We are issuing
this AD to prevent the accumulation of flammable fluids or vapors,
which could lead to a flammability issue.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions in paragraphs
(f)(1) and (f)(2) of this AD.
    (1) For all affected airplanes: Within the next 100 hours time-
in-service (TIS) after October 15, 2013 (the effective date of this
AD) or within 3 months after October 15, 2013 (the effective date of
this AD), whichever occurs first, modify the airplane following Part
1 of GippsAero Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA8-2012-96, Issue 4,
dated August 12, 2013.
    (2) For affected airplanes equipped with a cargo pod part number
GA8-255004-017 or GA8-255004-019: Before further flight after the
modification required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, modify the
cargo pod following Part 2 of GippsAero Mandatory Service Bulletin
SB-GA8-2012-96, Issue 4, dated August 12, 2013.

(g) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal
inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(h) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Safety Authority AD No. AD/GA8/7,
dated September 2, 2013, for related information. You may examine
the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating it in Docket No. FAA-2013-0823.

(i) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) GippsAero Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA8-2012-96, Issue
4, dated August 12, 2013.
    (ii) Reserved.

    (3) For GippsAero service information identified in this AD,
contact GA 8 Airvan (Pty) Ltd, c/o GippsAero Pty Ltd, Attn:
Technical Services, P.O. Box 881, Morwell Victoria 3840, Australia;
telephone: + 61 03 5172 1200; fax: +61 03 5172 1201; Internet:
http://www.gippsaero.com/customer-support/technical-publications.aspx.
    (4) You may review copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on September 16, 2013.
Pat Mullen,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-22978 Filed 9-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 147 (Friday, July 31, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45707-45708]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18744]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2015-0073]

Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or
Modification of a Railroad Signal System

    In accordance with Part 235 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) and 49 U.S.C. 20502(a), this document provides the
public notice that by a document dated July 14, 2015, Pan Am Railways
(PAR) petitioned the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) seeking
approval for the discontinuance or modification of a signal system. FRA
assigned the petition Docket Number FRA-2015-0073.
    Applicant: Pan Am Railways, Mr. Timothy Kunzler, Chief Engineer,
C&S, 1700 Iron Horse Park, North Billerica, MA 01862.
    PAR seeks approval of the discontinuance of the traffic control
system on the Freight Main Line (FML) of the Maine Central Railroad
Company (MEC). The Springfield Terminal Railway Company (ST) is the
operator of the line, as lessor from the owner, MEC. Both ST and MEC
are wholly-owned subsidiaries of PAR.
    The proposed discontinuance is located on the FML between control
point freight (CPF) main 66 at Milepost (MP) 65.50, in Hermon, ME, and
CPF-109 at MP 109.85, in Benton, ME.
    The tracks involved include single main track from CPF-66 to CPF-90
at MP 90.37, double main track from CPF-90 to CPF-92 at MP 92.87,
single main track from CPF-92 to CPF-107 at MP 107.42, and double main
track from CPFI07 to CPF-109.
    The proposed changes are as follows:
     Discontinue interlockings and associated appliances at
CPF-66, CPF-78, CPF-80, CPF-90, CPF-92, CPF-93, CPF-107, and CPF-109.
     Replace power-operated switches with hand-operated
switches at CPF-90, CPF-92, CPF-107, and CPF-109.
     Discontinue block signal Numbers 1279, 1257, 1256, 1218,
1207, 1192, 1129, 1100, 1087, 1068, 1030, Sl030, 995, 986, 956, 955,
932, 927, 898, and 899.
     Install distant signal at MP l07.42, governing westward
movements to CPF-110.
    This territory is under direct control of the district one train
dispatcher, located at PAR offices in North Billerica.
    The reason given for the proposed discontinuance is that traffic
volumes do not warrant a traffic control system.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulatons.gov and in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation's (DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations
Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
    Communications received by September 14, 2015 will be considered by
FRA before final action is taken. Comments received after that date
will be considered as far as practicable.
    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the document,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the
public to better inform its processes. DOT posts these comments,
without edit, including any personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
    See also http://www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice for the privacy
notice of regulations.gov or interested parties may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 22, 2015.
Ron Hynes,
Director, Office of Technical Oversight.
[FR Doc. 2015-18744 Filed 7-30-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register: May 25, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 101)]
[Notices]
[Page 30137]
[DOCID:fr25my06-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Application for Non-Project Use of Project Lands and
Waters and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

May 19, 2006.
    Take notice that the following application has been filed with the
Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Non-Project Use of Project Lands and Waters.
    b. Project No: 2206-031.
    c. Date filed: March 14, 2006.
    d. Applicant: Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
    e. Name of Project: Yadkin-Pee Dee Project.
    f. Location: The project is located on the Pee Dee River in Stanly,
Montgomery, Anson, and Richmond Counties, North Carolina.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r)
and 799 and 801.
    h. Applicant Contact: Larry Mann, Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.,
179 Tillery Dam Road, Mt. Gilead, NC 27306,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Rebecca Martin at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    j. Deadline for filing comments and or motions: June 19, 2006.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington DC 20426. Please include the project
number (P-2206-031) on any comments or motions filed. Comments,
protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the
Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' link.
The Commission strongly encourages e-filings.
    k. Description of Application: The licensee requests Commission
approval of a permit application, filed by the Carolina Forest Marina,
to expand their existing marina by constructing three docks to support
30 additional boat slips. The docks will extend from 90 to 100 feet
into Lake Tillery. A trash deflector is proposed to be constructed
upstream of the northern most pier.
    l. Location of Application: The filing is available for review at
the Commission in the Public Reference Room, located at 888 First
Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``e-Library''

link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, please
contact FERC Online support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free
(866) 208-3676 or TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filings must
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS'', ``PROTEST'', OR ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as
applicable, and the Project Number of the particular application to
which the filing refers. A copy of any motion to intervene must also be
served upon each representative of the Applicant specified in the
particular application.
    p. Agency Comments: Federal, state, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.
    q. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov

under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-8026 Filed 5-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 41 (Tuesday, March 3, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11323-11326]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04271]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2014-0399; FRL-9923-66-Region 7]

Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Approval and
Promulgation: Missouri; St. Louis Inspection and Maintenance Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submitted by the State of Missouri relating to its vehicle Inspection
and Maintenance (I/M) Program. On August 16, 2007, and December 7,
2007, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) requested to
amend the SIP to replace the St. Louis centralized vehicle test
program, called the Gateway Clean Air Program (GCAP), with a de-
centralized, OBD-only vehicle I/M program called the Gateway Vehicle
Inspection Program (GVIP). In this action, EPA is also approving three
additional SIP revisions submitted by Missouri related to the state's
I/M program including: Exemptions for specially constructed vehicles or
``kit-cars,'' exemptions for Plugin Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV),
and rescission of Missouri State Highway Patrol rules from the Missouri
SIP.
    These revisions to Missouri's SIP do not have an adverse effect on
air quality as demonstrated in the technical support document which is
a part of this docket. EPA's approval of these SIP revisions is being
done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: This final rule is effective on April 2, 2015.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R07-OAR-2014-0399. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219. The Regional Office's official hours of business
are Monday

through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays. The
interested persons wanting to examine these documents should make an
appointment with the office at least 24 hours in advance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Brown, Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following:

I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
III. EPA's response to comments.
IV. What action is EPA taking?

I. What is being addressed in this document?

    EPA is approving revisions to the St. Louis vehicle I/M program to
replace the centralized, transient I/M240 vehicle I/M program (GCAP)
with the de-centralized, OBD-only, vehicle I/M program (GVIP). MDNR
submitted to EPA five SIP revision submissions to address the vehicle
I/M program replacement and associated state rule, plus one
supplemental demonstration. They are as follows:
    On August 16, 2007, MDNR requested that Missouri Rule 10 CSR 10-
5.380, ``Motor Vehicle Emissions Inspection'' be rescinded and replaced
with rule 10 CSR 10-5.381, ``On-Board Diagnostics Motor Vehicle
Emissions Inspection.'' In that same submittal letter, MDNR also
requested that Missouri Rule 10 CSR 10-5.375, ``Motor Vehicles
Emissions Inspection Waiver'' be rescinded. EPA is not taking any
action on 10 CSR 10-5.375 as it is being replaced in its entirety with
the GVIP I/M program, Missouri Rule 10 CSR 10-5.381.
    On December 14, 2007, MDNR submitted the new GVIP plan and
performance standard demonstration to show that the GVIP program meets
the basic requirements as described in 40 CFR part 51 subpart S. This
submission also requests that EPA approve the plan to replace the GCAP
I/M program with the new GVIP program.
    On December 21, 2007, Missouri submitted a revision requesting that
the Missouri State Highway Patrol rules be removed from the Missouri
SIP because the new rule, 10 CSR 10-5.381, does not rely on the
Missouri Highway Patrol rules for enforcement. More details can be
found in the technical support document that is a part of this docket.
    On January 2, 2009, MDNR submitted a required supplemental
demonstration for I/M network type and program evaluation as required
by 40 CFR 51.353. This demonstration is required within one year after
the I/M program begins.
    On June 17, 2009, Missouri submitted a revision to I/M rule 10 CSR
10-5.381 which includes minor clarification edits and exempts specially
constructed vehicles or ``kit-cars'' from the rule.
    On December 10, 2012, Missouri submitted a revision to exempt
Plugin Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV) from the I/M program as codified
in rule 10 CSR 10-5.381.
    As part of our review, EPA performed a separate analysis of all the
state's SIP submissions and a cumulative air quality analysis as
documented in the technical support document that is part of this
docket. EPA's analysis shows that these SIP revisions do not adversely
affect air quality in the St. Louis area and are approvable.

II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?

    The state submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In
addition, as explained above and in more detail in the technical
support document which is part of this docket, the revision meets the
substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.

III. EPA's Response to Comments

    The public comment period on EPA's proposed rule opened December
28, 2014, the date of its publication in the Federal Register, and
closed on January 29, 2015. During this period, EPA received five
comments from one anonymous commenter.
    Comment 1: The commenter contends that while no action is necessary
with regards to removing Missouri Rule 10 CSR 10-5.375 from the SIP
because Missouri is replacing the GCAP program with the GVIP program,
EPA incorrectly stated that Missouri Rule 10 CSR 10-5.375 was not part
of the SIP.
    Response 1: EPA agrees with the commenter that 10 CSR 10-5.375 was
included in list number 47 in 40 CFR 52.1320(e) under ``Vehicle I/M
Program'' and also should have been listed in 40 CFR 52.1320(c) but was
not. EPA also agrees that no action is necessary to remove 10 CSR 10-
5.375 from the SIP as the GCAP I/M program is being wholly replaced
with the GVIP I/M program. Therefore, no action is necessary on
Missouri's request to remove Missouri rule CSR 10-5.375 from the SIP.
    Comment 2: The commenter contends that the analysis performed to
show that the new I/M program meets the performance standard did not
account for the removal of both the IM240 and single speed idle test
and therefore was done improperly.
    Response 2: Missouri is not required to include a performance
standard test for IM240 and single speed idle testing as Missouri is
only required to meet the Basic Performance Standard test set forth by
EPA. The reason for the performance standard testing was to give an
indication of whether or not the GVIP program would satisfy the minimum
requirements of EPA's I/M rule. The GVIP program's modeling parameters
used by Missouri during this Basic Performance Standard test analysis
were correctly identified and performed adequately. The technical
support document (TSD) supplied in the docket reviews the performance
standard test results and also includes a section 110(l) modeling
exercise that compares the GCAP and GVIP I/M programs emissions
results.
    Comment 3: The commenter states that portions of the St. Louis area
are required to have an enhanced I/M program as part of the 1-hour
ozone maintenance plan which covers the second ten-year maintenance
plan and beyond. The commenter says that this means that until Missouri
has demonstrated that the enhanced I/M program is no longer necessary,
and EPA approves this demonstration, the St. Louis area is still
required to have an enhanced I/M program.
    Response 3: Under the 1-hour standard, the St. Louis area was
classified as moderate non-attainment and was only required to do a
basic I/M program. At the time the GCAP was approved, its emission
reductions were compared to those that would be achieved by the basic
I/M performance standard and were found to exceed the performance
standard. Because the GCAP program met the applicable performance
standard as well as providing the additional emission reductions
required under the attainment plan, it was approved. Today's action,
among other things, is approving the replacement of the GCAP program
with the GVIP program which has also been found to meet the minimum
basic program requirements but also achieves greater emission
reductions than the GCAP program it replaces as demonstrated by the
section 110(l) analysis included in the TSD in the docket for today's
action. The GVIP

program meets all the requirements previously met by the GCAP when it
was approved into the SIP. Today's action does not weaken or remove the
I/M program from the SIP as demonstrated in the TSD, contrary to what
is implied by the commenter. Additionally, Missouri relies on the GVIP
program and it is specifically relied upon in the St. Louis area's 1997
8-hour ozone maintenance plan.
    Comment 4: The commenter states that Missouri's emissions analysis
uses the outdated EPA mobile model, MOBILE-6, and that because Missouri
submitted this SIP revision over five years ago and EPA has not acted
on it, the burden should be on EPA to perform an additional analysis
utilizing the updated EPA mobile model, MOVES2014.
    Response 4: EPA did perform an additional modeling analysis
utilizing MOVES2014 to compare the GCAP and GVIP I/M program
differences for control efficiency and emissions results for the St.
Louis area. The results show that the GVIP program achieves greater
emission reductions than the GCAP program. These results can be found
in the TSD which is part of this docket.
    Comment 5: The commenter states that EPA should perform an
additional modeling analysis that uses the performance standard in the
February 2014 guidance document EPA-420-B-14-006. The commenter further
states that by using this guidance any analysis will show that the
removal of the IM240 test and single speed idle test will result in a
loss of NOX and VOC emission reductions and that losses will
need to be compensated for with other emission reduction measures.
    Response 5: Additional performance standard modeling is only
required if changes are made to an approved I/M program prior to
attaining the standard for which the program was adopted (section 4.0,
EPA guidance document: EPA-420-B-14-006). Missouri has attained the
standard(s) for which the program was adopted. Once an area goes from
being a nonattainment area to an attainment and maintenance area, the
only analysis required when changing an I/M program is to estimate the
shortfall, if any, created by the change as part of a required 110(l)
demonstration. The 110(l) demonstration modeling contained in the TSD,
provided in the docket, was performed using the February 2014 guidance
cited in the comment and shows that there was no shortfall created by
the change from the GCAP to the GVIP which is being approved through
this action.

IV. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is taking final action to amend the Missouri SIP to approve
revisions to St. Louis vehicle I/M program. While these SIP revisions
were submitted in separate requests, they are direct changes to the St.
Louis Vehicle Inspection Program and are being addressed in one SIP
action.

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Missouri
rule 10-5.381 ``On Board Diagnostics Motor Vehicle Emissions
Inspection'' described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below.'' EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
generally available electronically through www.regulations.gov and/or
in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section
of this preamble for more information).
    Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator is required to
approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by May 4, 2015. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: February 18, 2015.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency amends 40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et. seq.

Subpart AA--Missouri

0
2. In Sec.  52.1320(c) the table is amended by:
0
a. Removing the entry for ``10-5.380'';
0
b. Adding in numerical order the entry for ``10-5.381''; and
0
c. Removing the chapter title ``Missouri Department of Public Safety
Division 50-State Highway Patrol Chapter 2--Motor Vehicle Inspection''
and its entries for ``50-2.010 through 50-2.420''.
    The addition reads as follows:

Sec.  52.1320  Identification of Plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                        EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      State
   Missouri  citation              Title            effective      EPA approval date           Explanation
                                                       date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Chapter 5--Air Quality Regulations and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
10-5.381................  On-Board Diagnostics        12/30/12  3/3/15 [Insert Federal   .......................
                           Motor Vehicle                         Register citation].
                           Emissions Inspection.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-04271 Filed 3-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 133 (Thursday, July 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44846-44847]
[FR Doc No: 2023-14883]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No.: FAA-2023-0584; Summary Notice No. 2023-24]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; Executive
Jet Management, Inc.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of Federal Aviation Regulations. The
purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and
participation in, the FAA's exemption process. Neither publication of
this notice nor the inclusion nor omission of information in the
summary is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its
final disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before August 2, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2023-0584
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140,
West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m.,

Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jimeca Callaham,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
Office of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Angela O. Anderson,
Director, Regulatory Support Division, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2023-0584.
    Petitioner: Executive Jet Management.
    Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected: Sec. Sec.  135.337(a)(1),
135.337(b)(1), 135.337(b)(2), 135.339(e)(3), and 135.339(e)(4).
    Description of Relief Sought: Executive Jet Management, Inc.
(EJM) has requested an exemption from 14 CFR 135.337(a)(1),
135.337(b)(1), 135.337(b)(2), 135.339(e)(3), and 135.339(e)(4) to
the extent necessary to permit authorized Company Check Pilots to
conduct Section 135.299 Pilot in Command Line Checks from any EJM
aircraft's observation seat station.

[FR Doc. 2023-14883 Filed 7-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: November 27, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 227)]
[Notices]
[Page 66213-66214]
[DOCID:fr27no07-126]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-56820; File No. SR-FICC-2007-09]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
Relating to the Correspondent Clearing Service

November 20, 2007.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on August 17, 2007, the Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation (``FICC'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared
primarily by FICC. FICC filed the proposed rule change pursuant to
section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act \2\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(1) \3\
thereunder so that the proposal was effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The proposed rule change enhances FICC's Government Securities
Division's (``GSD'') correspondent clearing service for netting members
submitting transaction data (``Submitting Members'') on behalf of non-
member firms (``Executing Firms'').

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, FICC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. FICC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    Currently, GSD's rules provide that a Submitting Member must submit
transaction data to GSD when it acts on behalf of an Executing Firm for
comparison-only processing or for both comparison and netting
processing. The election made by the Submitting Member to submit
Executing Firm transactions for comparison or comparison and netting is
done on a firm level for each Executing Firm on whose behalf the
Submitting Member acts. For example, when Submitting Member A elects to
submit transactions for netting processing on behalf of Executing Firm
B, all trades submitted on behalf of Executing Firm B will proceed to
netting, and the Submitting Member will incur all resulting settlement
and other obligations that arise under GSD's rules with respect to
trade data submitted on behalf of Executing Firm B. Conversely, when
Submitting Member A elects to submit transactions for Executing Firm C
for comparison-only processing, all transactions submitted on behalf of
Executing Firm C will only enter the GSD's comparison system with no
settlement obligations arising for Submitting Member A with respect to
these transactions.
    Under the rule change, FICC will allow a Submitting Member to
select for each Executing Firm for which it submits trades those trade
types (i.e., buy-sell or repurchase agreements) that will be
comparison-only transactions and those trade types that will be netting
transactions. For example, Submitting Member A may select to submit
Executing Firm B's repurchase agreement transactions for comparison-
only processing and Executing Firm B's buy-sell transactions for
netting. Members will not be permitted to submit trades for either
comparison-only or netting processing on a trade-by-

trade basis. Elections made with respect to how transaction types are
processed through FICC must be effected through the applicable FICC
Executing Firm Agreement. As noted above, settlement obligations will
arise for Submitting Member A for each transaction that proceeds to
netting.
    Under the proposed changes, Submitting Members will be required to
notify GSD with respect to each Executing Firm for which they submit
data which transactions types that will be processed as comparison-only
transactions and which will proceed to netting. Submitting members must
notify GSD three business days prior to the commencement of the initial
data submission on behalf of an Executing Firm. Any modifications made
to an election will require three business days notice to GSD.
    FICC will announce to its members by means of an Important Notice
the effective date of this enhancement. GSD anticipates implementation
to be during the fourth quarter of this year.
    FICC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of section 17A of the Act \4\ and the rules thereunder.
FICC states that this rule change enhances existing capabilities
extended to netting members acting as Submitting Members under GSD's
rules. FICC further states that the proposed changes will not affect
FICC's ability to safeguard the funds and securities in FICC's control
or for which it is responsible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    FICC does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any
impact or impose any burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not yet
been solicited or received. FICC will notify the Commission of any
written comments received by FICC.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) \5\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(4) \6\ thereunder
because it effects a change in an existing service of FICC that does
not adversely affect the safeguarding of securities or funds in FICC's
control or for which FICC is responsible and does not significantly
affect FICC's or its participants' respective rights or obligations. At
any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission could have summarily abrogated such rule change if it
appeared to the Commission that such action was necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \6\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File No. SR-FICC-2007-09 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File No. FICC-2007-09. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 450 Fifth Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at FICC's principal office and on FICC's Web
site at http://ficc.com/gov/gov.docs.jsp?NS-query=#rf. All comments

received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submission should refer to File No. SR-FICC-2007-09 and should be
submitted on or before December 18, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-23021 Filed 11-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: May 10, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 89)]
[Notices]
[Page 25886-25887]
[DOCID:fr10my10-87]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, May 13,
2010 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5),
(7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at
the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday,
May 13, 2010 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution of administrative proceedings;
A litigation matter; and
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 6, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-11219 Filed 5-6-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P