[Federal Register: November 13, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 218)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 58553-58554]
[DOCID:fr13no09-7]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0558; FRL-8975-6]

Revisions to the Arizona State PM-10 Implementation Plan;
Maricopa County Air Quality Department

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the Maricopa Air
Quality Department (MCAQD) portion of the Arizona State Implementation
Plan (SIP). These revisions were proposed in the Federal Register on
August 26, 2009 and concern particulate matter (PM) emissions from non-
metallic mineral mining and processing in the Maricopa County (Phoenix)
serious PM-10 nonattainment area. We are approving local rules that
regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in
1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on January 8, 2010.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0558 for
this action. The index to the docket is available electronically at
http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment
during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sona Chilingaryan, EPA Region IX,
(415) 972-3368<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On August 26, 2009 (74 FR 43085), EPA proposed to approve the
following rule into the Arizona SIP.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Local agency               Rule          Rule title            Adopted         Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MCAQD...............................             316   Nonmetallic Mineral             3/12/08          7/10/08
                                                        Processing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We proposed to approve this rule because we determined that it
complied with the CAA requirements for Best Available Control Measures
(Section 189(b)(1)(B)) and Most Stringent Measures (Section 188(e)).
Our proposed action contains more information on the rule and our
evaluation.

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received comments from the following parties.
    1. Lawrence Odle, Director, MCAQD; letter dated September 23, 2009
and received September 25, 2009.
    2. Joy E. Herr-Cardillo, Staff Attorney, Arizona Center for Law in
the Public Interest (ACLPI); letter dated and received on September 25,
2009.
    The comments and our responses are summarized below.
    Comment #1: MCAQD supports our proposed approval of 316.
    Response #1: No response necessary.
    Comment #2: MCAQD provides information related to MCAQD's current
efforts and future plans to improve and clarify Rule 316. MCAQD has
initiated a rulemaking process to revise the rule to include
alternative control measures approved by MCAQD and EPA, has formed a
working group to evaluate the Department's experience with the moisture
testing and sampling protocols related to the rule, and plans to
separate the requirements in Rule 316 for different kinds of facilities
into five separate rules. In the current rulemaking, the Department
intends to separate product transfer and distribution facilities out of
Rule 316, and in the future also plans to separate asphaltic concrete
batch plants, concrete batch plants, inert landfills, and gypsum and
all types of mulch.
    Response #2: This comment addresses MCAQD's future plans and was
provided for information purposes only. It does not affect EPA's
proposed action on the March 12, 2008 version of Rule 316, and no
further response is necessary.
    Comment #3: MCAQD comments that Table 1 in 74 FR 43085 incorrectly
refers to 3/10/08 as the adoption date for the rule, and notes that the
correct date is 3/12/08.
    Response #3: We agree. There was a typographical error in the
adoption date. We do not believe this error is likely to result in
significant confusion since only one version of the rule was adopted in
2008, and the previous version was adopted in 2005.
    Comment #4: ACLPI comments that in August 2009 it notified us of
its intent to take legal action against EPA for failure to act on Rule
316. ACLPI supports the proposed approval and the increased stringency
of Rule 316.

    Comment #4: No response necessary.

III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted that change our assessment that the
submitted rule complies with the relevant CAA requirements. Therefore,
as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving
this rule into the Arizona SIP as meeting the requirements of sections
189(b)(1)(B) and 188(e).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 12, 2010. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: October 5, 2009.
Jane Diamond,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

0
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart D--Arizona

0
2. Section 52.120 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(141)(i)(B)(2) to
read as follows:

Sec.  52.120  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (141) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) * * *
    (2) Rule 316, ``Nonmetallic Mineral Processing,'' adopted on
    March 12, 2008.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-27046 Filed 11-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: August 10, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 154)]
[Notices]
[Page 45032]
[DOCID:fr10au07-70]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-554-000]

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Refund
Report

August 6, 2007.
    Take notice that on July 31, 2007 Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Corporation (Transco) filed a report reflecting the flow through of
refunds received from Dominion Transmission, Inc.
    Transco states that on July 31, 2007, it refunded to its LSS, FT-NT
and GSS customers $23,316.14 resulting from the refund of Dominion
Transmission, Inc., Docket No. RP07-523-000.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated
below. Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or
protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve
motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time August 13, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-15653 Filed 8-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 19, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28555-28557]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12996]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0823]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Format and Content Requirements for Over-the-Counter
Drug Product Labeling

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection
of certain information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on the standardized format and
content requirements for the labeling of over-the-counter (OTC) drug
products.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by August 19, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be considered. Electronic comments
must be submitted on or before August 19, 2019. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of August 19, 2019. Comments
received by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions)
will be considered timely if they are postmarked or the delivery
service acceptance receipt is on or before that date.

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2013-N-0823 for ``Agency Information Collection Activities;
Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Format and Content Requirements
for Over-the- Counter Drug Product Labeling.'' Received comments, those
filed in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets
Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Domini Bean, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

Format and Content Requirements for Over-the-Counter Drug Product
Labeling--21 CFR Part 201

OMB Control Number 0910-0340--Extension

    This information collection supports FDA regulations at Sec.
201.66 (21 CFR 201.66), which establish standardized content and format
requirements for the labeling of all marketed OTC drug products. The
regulations set forth the content and format requirements for the Drug
Facts portion of labels on OTC drug products. These regulations require
OTC drug product labeling to include uniform headings and subheadings,
presented in a standardized order, with minimum standards for type size
and other graphical features.
    Currently marketed OTC drug products are already required to comply
with these labeling requirements and will incur no further burden to
comply with Drug Facts labeling requirements in Sec.  201.66. Labeling
modifications already required to be in Drug Facts format are ``usual
and customary'' as part of routine redesign practice, thus they do not
create additional burden within the meaning of the PRA.
    Therefore, burden for this information collection is that which is
necessary to comply with the labeling requirements in Sec.  201.66,
applicable to new OTC drug products and OTC sunscreen drug products
introduced to the marketplace under new drug applications, abbreviated
new drug applications, or an OTC drug monograph. New OTC drug products
must comply with the labeling requirements in Sec.  201.66 as they are
introduced to the marketplace.
    Based on our electronic drug registration and listing database, we
estimate that approximately 10,463 new OTC drug product stock keeping
units (SKUs) are introduced to the marketplace each year. We estimate
that these SKUs are marketed by 1,416 manufacturers. We estimate that
the preparation of labeling for new OTC drug products requires 12 hours
to prepare, complete, and review prior to submitting the new labeling
to us. Based on this estimate, the annual reporting burden for this
type of labeling is 94,296 hours.
    All currently marketed sunscreen products are required to comply
with the Drug Facts labeling requirements in Sec.  201.66, so they will
incur no further burden under the information collection provisions in
the regulation. However, a new OTC sunscreen drug product, like any new
OTC drug product, will be subject to a one-time burden to comply with
Drug Facts labeling requirements in Sec.  201.66. We estimate, based on
our electronic drug registration and listing database, that 5,253 new
SKUs of OTC sunscreen drug products will be marketed each year. We
estimate that these 5,253 SKUs will be marketed by 294 manufacturers.
We estimate that 12 hours will be spent on each label. This is
reflected in table 1, row 1.
    When determining the burden for Sec.  201.66, it is also important
to consider exemptions or deferrals of the regulation allowed products
under Sec.  201.66(e). We receive very few requests for exemptions or
deferrals. We also estimate that a request for deferral or exemption
requires 24 hours to complete. This is reflected in table 1, row 2.
    We estimate the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                           Table 1--Estimated Annual Third-Party Disclosure Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Number of
         21 CFR section              Number of      disclosures    Total annual   Average burden    Total hours
                                    respondents   per respondent    disclosure    per disclosure
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.   201.66(c) and (d) for new             855            9.19           7,858              12          94,296
 OTC drug products..............
Sec.   201.66(e)................               1               1               1              24              24
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............          94,320
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.

    Our estimated burden for the information collection reflects an
overall increase of 82,797 hours and a corresponding increase of 6,898
disclosures. This increase corresponds with data obtained from our
database.

    Dated: June 14, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-12996 Filed 6-18-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request Environmental Protection Agency 2. OMB control number b. None a 2 0 5 0  0 1 7 1 __ __ __ __

3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. Q New collection b. Q Revision of a currently approved collection c. X Extension of a currently approved collection d. Q Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. Q Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. Q Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a. X Regular b. Q Emergency  Approval requested by: c. Q Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Q Yes X No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. X Three years from approval date b. Other Specify: / /___

7. Title: NESHAP for Hazardous Waste Combustors ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart EEE)  ( Renewal)

8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) EPA ICR # 1773.06 9. Keywords : Hazardous Waste Combustors, Combustion, Hazardous Waste Incinerators, Lightweight Aggregate Kilns, Cement Kilns, Reporting Requirements, Recordkeeping Requirements 10. Abstract : This ICR is a request for extension of a currently approved collection under OMB Control No. 2050 0171 for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants ( NESHAPs) for Hazardous Waste Combustors. On September 30, 1999, EPA promulgated ( 64 FR 52828) standards to control emissions of hazardous air pollutants from incinerators, cement kilns and lightweight aggregate kilns that burn hazardous wastes under 40 CFR Part 63. Revisions to these standards and compliance and implementation amendments were promulgated on February 13 and 14, 2002. This continuation ICR takes into account the changes to the paperwork burden related to all the changes to the September 30, 1999 rule to date, as well as to the changes in the hazardous waste combustor universe since the last ICR approval.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. P Business or other for profit e. X Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Q Voluntary b. Q Required to obtain or retain benefits c. P Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 119 b. Total annual responses 2,557 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically : 5 % c. Total hours requested 151,339 d. Current OMB inventory 71,075 e. Difference 80,264 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 80,264 2. Adjustment 0 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars) a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs 15 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) 3,910 c. Total annualized cost requested 3,925 d. Current OMB inventory 1,612 e. Difference 2,313 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change 2,313 2. Adjustment 0 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. P Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. X Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. X Reporting 1. X On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. X Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. Q Semi annually 6. X Annually 7. Q Biennially 8. Q Other ( describe)

17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes QX No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Shiva Garg Phone: 703 308 8459 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( I) Why the information is being collected' ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( I) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Oscar Morales, Director Collection Strategies Division Division Office of Regulatory Management and Evaluation ( OPPE) Date OMB 83 I


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 125 (Monday, June 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38931-38932]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13965]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2010-0030]

Ionizing Radiation Standard; Extension of the Office of
Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information Collection
(Paperwork) Requirements

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comments concerning the proposal to
extend the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) approval of the
information collection requirements contained in the Ionizing Radiation
Standard.

DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by
August 28, 2020.

ADDRESSES:
    Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting
comments.
    Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
    Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger, or courier service:
When using this method, you must submit a copy of your comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA-2010-0030,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N-3653, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210.
Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger, and courier service) are
accepted during the OSHA Docket Office's normal business hours, 10:00
a.m. to 3:00 p.m., ET.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and the
OSHA docket number (OSHA-2010-0030) for the Information Collection
Request (ICR). All comments, including any personal information you
provide, such as social security numbers and dates of birth, are placed
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at http://www.regulations.gov. For further information on submitting
comments, see the ``Public Participation'' heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
    Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at
the above address. All documents in the docket (including this Federal
Register notice) are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index;
however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly
available to read or download through the website. All submissions,
including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and
copying at the OSHA Docket Office. You may also contact Theda Kenney at
(202) 693-2222 to obtain a copy of the ICR.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seleda Perryman or Theda Kenney,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Department of Labor, as part of a continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance process to provide the public with an opportunity to
comment on proposed and continuing information collection requirements
in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that information is in the desired
format, the reporting burden (time and costs) is minimal, the
collection instruments are clearly understood, and OSHA's estimate of
the information collection burden is accurate. The Occupational Safety
and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) authorizes
information collection by employers as necessary or appropriate for
enforcement of the OSH Act, or for developing information regarding the
causes and prevention of occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also requires OSHA to obtain
such information with a minimum burden upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to reduce to the maximum extent
feasible unnecessary duplication of effort in obtaining said
information (29 U.S.C. 657).
    The basic purpose of the information collection requirements in the
Ionizing Radiation Standard is to document that employers are providing
their workers with protection from ionizing radiation exposure. The
information collection requirements contained in the Standard include:
Monitoring worker exposure to ionizing radiation, posting caution signs
at radiation areas, reporting worker overexposures to OSHA, maintaining
exposure records, and providing exposure records to current and former
workers.

II. Special Issues for Comment

    OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:
     Whether the proposed information collection requirements
are necessary for the proper performance of the agency's functions,
including whether the information is useful;
     The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and
costs) of the information collection requirements, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
     The quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
     Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply--
for example, by using automated or other technological information
collection and transmission techniques.

III. Proposed Actions

    OSHA is requesting an adjustment increase of 7,064 burden hours
from 52,016 to 59,080 hours. This increase is the result of an
estimated increase of 5% in the number of potentially exposed
employees. The total estimated number of establishments affected by the
regulation decreased from 13,849 to 13,135, a total adjustment of 714
less establishments, based on updated data.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Ionizing Radiation Standard (29 CFR 1910.1096).
    OMB Control Number: 1218-0103.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profits.
    Number of Respondents: 13,135.
    Frequency: On Occasion; Quarterly; Annually; Immediately; Within 24
hours; Within 30 days.
    Average Time Per Response: Varies.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 337,279.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 59,080.
    Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $8,892,917.

IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on This Notice and
internet Access to Comments and Submissions

    You may submit comments in response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal; (2) by facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other

material must identify the agency name and the OSHA docket number
(Docket No. OSHA-2010-0030) for the ICR. You may supplement electronic
submissions by uploading document files electronically. If you wish to
mail additional materials in reference to an electronic or facsimile
submission, you must submit them to the OSHA Docket Office (see the
section of this notice titled ADDRESSES). The additional materials must
clearly identify electronic comments by your name, date, and the docket
number so that the agency can attach them to your comments.
    Because of security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the delivery of materials by hand,
express delivery, messenger, or courier service, please contact the
OSHA Docket Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>; TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comments and submissions are posted without change at http://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about
submitting personal information such as social security numbers and
dates of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index, some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to read or download through this
website. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available
for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. Information on
using the http://www.regulations.gov website to submit comments and
access the docket is available at the website's ``User Tips'' link.
Contact the OSHA Docket Office for information about materials not
available through the website, and for assistance in using the internet
to locate docket submissions.

V. Authority and Signature

    Loren Sweatt, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this
notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012
(77 FR 3912).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on June 23, 2020.
Loren Sweatt,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety
and Health.
[FR Doc. 2020-13965 Filed 6-26-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 155 (Thursday, August 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49834-49835]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20368]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. DOT-NHTSA-2011-0113, Notice 1]

Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming
2009 Dodge RAM 1500 Laramie Crew Cab Trucks Manufactured for the
Mexican Market Are Eligible for Importation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces receipt by the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that
2009 Dodge RAM 1500 Laramie Crew Cab trucks manufactured for the
Mexican market (2009 Dodge RAM 1500 Mexican trucks), that were not
originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), are eligible for importation into the
United States because they are substantially similar to vehicles that
were originally manufactured for sale in the United States and that
were certified by their manufacturer as complying with the safety
standards (the U.S.-certified version of the 2009 Dodge RAM 1500
Laramie Crew Cab trucks) and they are capable of being readily altered
to conform to the standards.

DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is September 12,
2011.

ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the

online instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Comments must be written in the English language, and
be no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to
the length of necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are
submitted in hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive confirmation that your comments were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
    How to read comments submitted to the docket: You may read the
comments received by Docket Management at the address and times given
above. You may also view the documents from the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Follow the online instructions for accessing the dockets. The
docket ID number and title of this notice are shown at the heading of
this document notice. Please note that even after the comment closing
date, we will continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it
becomes available. Further, some people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically search the Docket for
new material.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA<PHONE_NUMBER>).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not
originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS shall be
refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that
the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle
originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United
States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS.
    Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either
manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to
49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice
in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords
interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the
close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is
eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in
the Federal Register.
    Wallace Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc. of Houston, Texas
(WETL) (Registered Importer 90-005) has petitioned NHTSA to decide
whether nonconforming 2009 Dodge RAM 1500 Mexican trucks are eligible
for importation into the United States. The vehicles which WETL
believes are substantially similar are 2009 Dodge RAM 1500 Laramie Crew
Cab trucks that were manufactured for sale in the United States and
certified by their manufacturer as conforming to all applicable FMVSS.
    The petitioner claims that it carefully compared non-U.S. certified
2009 Dodge RAM 1500 Mexican trucks to their U.S.-certified
counterparts, and found the vehicles to be substantially similar with
respect to compliance with most FMVSS.
    WETL submitted information with its petition intended to
demonstrate that non-U.S. certified 2009 Dodge RAM 1500 Mexican trucks,
as originally manufactured, conform to many FMVSS in the same manner as
their U.S. certified counterparts, or are capable of being readily
altered to conform to those standards.
    Specifically, the petitioner claims that non-U.S. certified 2009
Dodge RAM 1500 Mexican trucks are identical to their U.S.-certified
counterparts with respect to compliance with Standard Nos. 101 Controls
and Displays, 102 Transmission Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock,
and Transmission Braking Effect, 103 Windshield Defrosting and
Defogging Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems, 106 Brake
Hoses, 111 Rearview Mirrors, 113 Hood Latch System, 114 Theft
Protection, 116 Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids, 118 Power-Operated Window,
Partition, and Roof Panel Systems, 120 Tire Selection and Rims for
Motor Vehicles Other than Passenger Cars, 124 Accelerator Control
Systems, 135 Light Vehicle Brake Systems, 138 Tire Pressure Monitoring
Systems, 201 Occupant Protection in Interior Impact, 202 Head
Restraints, 204 Steering Control Rearward Displacement, 205 Glazing
Materials, 206 Door Locks and Door Retention Components, 207 Seating
Systems, 208 Occupant Crash Protection 209 Seat Belt Assemblies, 210
Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages, 212 Windshield Mounting, 214 Side Impact
Protection, 216 Roof Crush Resistance, 219 Windshield Zone Intrusion,
225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems, 301 Fuel System Integrity, and
302 Flammability of Interior Materials.
    Petitioner also contends that the vehicle is capable of being
readily altered to meet the following standard, in the manner
indicated:
    Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated
Equipment: inspection of all vehicles and installation of U.S.-model
lamps on vehicles not already so equipped to ensure that the vehicles
meet the requirements of this standard.
    The petitioner additionally states that a vehicle identification
plate must be affixed to the vehicles near the left windshield post to
meet the requirements of 49 CFR part 565.
    All comments received before the close of business on the closing
date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for
examination in the docket at the above addresses both before and after
that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing
date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8;
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

    Issued on: August 5, 2011.
 Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2011-20368 Filed 8-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 81 (Monday, April 27, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23369-23370]
[FR Doc No: 2020-08890]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2019-D-5664]

Standardized Medicated Feed Assay Limits; Draft Guidance for
Industry; Availability; Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is extending
the comment period for the notice of availability that published in the
Federal Register on February 27, 2020. In that notice, FDA requested
comments on the draft guidance for industry (GFI) #264 entitled
``Standardized Medicated Feed Assay Limits.'' The Agency is taking this
action in response to a request for an extension to allow interested
persons additional time to submit comments.

DATES: FDA is extending the comment period on the document published
February 27, 2020 (85 FR 11369). Submit either electronic or written
comments on the draft guidance by June 26, 2020, to ensure that the
Agency considers your comments on this draft guidance before it begins
work on the final version of the guidance.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on any guidance at any time as
follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a

third party may not wish to be posted, such as medical information,
your or anyone else's Social Security number, or confidential business
information, such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you
include your name, contact information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2019-D-5664 for ``Standardized Medicated Feed Assay Limits.''
Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katie Ciesienski, Center for
Veterinary Medicine (HFV-141), Food and Drug Administration, 7500
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of February 27,
2020, FDA published a notice announcing the availability of draft GFI
#264 entitled ``Standardized Medicated Feed Assay Limits'' with a 60-
day comment period. This draft guidance recommends a standardized set
of assay limits for medicated feeds. Standardized medicated feed assay
limits allow predictability in the review process as the sponsor can
determine early in the drug development process what assay limits they
should expect to meet for medicated feeds used in Target Animal Safety,
Effectiveness, Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls, Bioequivalence,
and Human Food Safety residue chemistry studies. Assay limits are used
pre-approval to ensure that medicated feeds in these studies contain
the appropriate amount of drug, and post-approval for compliance and
customer service purposes.
    The Agency has received a request for a 90-day extension of the
comment period. The request conveyed concern that the current 60-day
comment period does not allow sufficient time to develop a
comprehensive response.
    FDA has considered the request and is extending the comment period
for the notice of availability for 60 days, until June 26, 2020. The
Agency believes that a 60-day extension allows adequate time for
interested persons to submit comments.

    Dated: April 21, 2020.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-08890 Filed 4-24-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


                    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

            DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

                    OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

                             WASHINGTON, DC

                                   	Issued by the Department of
Transportation on February 20, 2004

		       NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2004-16941

________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Application of Continental Airlines, Inc.  filed  1/20/04  for:

XX  Allocation of seven additional weekly U.S.-Ecuador combination
frequencies to provide a second daily Houston-Ecuador service.

Continental states that it plans to institute daily, nonstop round-trip
flights between Houston and Quito and between Houston and Guayaquil on
June 10, 2004.  It states that it currently holds seven frequencies
under which it operates a daily Houston-Quito-Guayaquil-Houston flight
and that in order to institute its proposed services, it will require an
additional seven frequencies.

The City of Houston and the Greater Houston Partnership filed a joint
answer in support of Continental’s application.

Applicant rep:    R. Bruce Keiner, Jr.<PHONE_NUMBER>      DOT Analyst:
 Linda Senese<PHONE_NUMBER>

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX  Granted (subject to conditions, see below)

The above action was effective when taken:  February 20, 2004, and will
remain in effect indefinitely, subject to conditions described below.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		    Office of International Aviation

XX  The authority granted is consistent with the civil aviation
agreement between the United States and Ecuador.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

    XX  Holder’s Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity

________________________

Conditions:  Consistent with our standard practice, the frequency
allocation granted is subject to the condition that if any of the
frequencies are not used for a period of 90 days, the allocation as to
that unused frequency will expire automatically and the frequency will
revert to the Department for reallocation.  The 90-day dormancy period
will begin on June 10, 2004, the date on which Continental proposes
operations with these frequencies.

(See Reverse Side)

2

________________________________________________________________________
____________

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department’s regulations, we found the applicant qualified to provide
the services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy and  (2) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest.  To the extent not granted, we denied all requests in the
referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 146 (Monday, July 30, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36402-36403]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16144]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0866; Airspace Docket No. 17-ASO-20]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of Class D Airspace, Removal of Class E Airspace, and
Establishment of Class E Airspace; Olive Branch, MS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends Class D airspace, removes Class E airspace
designated as an extension, and establishes Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet or more above the surface at Olive Branch Airport,
Olive Branch, MS. The Olive Branch non-directional radio beacon (NDB)
has been decommissioned, requiring the redesign of the airspace. This
action, also replaces the outdated term Airport/Facility Directory with
the term Chart Supplement in the Class D legal description.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, September 13, 2018. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11B at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends Class D airspace, removes Class E airspace, and
establishes Class E airspace at Olive Branch Airport, Olive Branch, MS,
to support IFR operations at the airport.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (83 FR 19472, May 3, 2018) for Docket No. FAA-2017-0866 to
amend Class D airspace, remove Class E airspace, and establish Class E
airspace at Olive Branch Airport, Olive Branch, MS.
    Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received.
    Class D and E airspace designations are published in paragraphs
5000, 6004, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.11B dated August
3, 2017, and effective September 15, 2017, which is incorporated by
reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The Class D and E airspace designations
listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017, and effective September 15,
2017. FAA Order 7400.11B is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11B lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by amending Class D airspace to a 4.1-mile radius, (from a 4-
mile radius) at Olive Branch Airport, Olive Branch, MS, and removes
Class E airspace designated as an extension to Class D, due to the
decommissioning of the Olive Branch NDB and cancellation of the NDB
approach. Also, this action establishes Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet or more above the surface at Olive Branch Airport,
Olive Branch, MS, (this airspace was removed the from Memphis, TN,
airspace in a separate rulemaking).
    Additionally, this action makes an editorial change to the Class D
airspace legal description replacing Airport/Facility Directory with
the term Chart Supplement.

    Class D and Class E airspace designations are published in
Paragraph 5000, 6004, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.11B,
dated August 3, 2017, and effective September 15, 2017, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 3, 2017, effective September 15, 2017, is amended
as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ASO MS D Olive Branch, MS [Amended]

Olive Branch Airport, MS
    (Lat. 34[deg]58'44'' N, long. 89[deg]47'13'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
2,900 feet within a 4.1-mile radius of Olive Branch Airport. This
Class D airspace area is effective during the specific days and
times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective
days and times will thereafter be continuously published in the
Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Designated as an Extension to a
Class D Surface Area.

* * * * *

ASO MS E4 Olive Branch, MS [Removed]

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASO MS E5 Olive Branch, MS [New]

Olive Branch Airport, MS
    (Lat. 34[deg]58'44'' N, long. 89[deg]47'13'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.6-mile radius of Olive Branch Airport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on July 19, 2018.
Ryan W. Almasy,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2018-16144 Filed 7-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P