[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 20 (Monday, February 1, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5163-5164]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01716]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-2736.

Extension:
     Order Granting Conditional Exemptions Under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 in Connection with Portfolio Margining of Swaps
and Security-Based Swaps; SEC File No. S7-13-12, OMB Control No.
3235-0698.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing
collection of information provided for in the Order Granting
Conditional Exemptions Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act'') in Connection with Portfolio Margining of Swaps and
Security-Based Swaps, Exchange Act Release No. 68433 (Dec. 14, 2012),
77 FR 75211 (Dec. 19, 2012) (``Order''). The Commission plans to submit
this existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget (``OMB'') for extension and approval.
    On December 14, 2012, the Commission found it necessary or
appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection
of investors to grant the conditional exemptions discussed in the
Order. Among other things, the Order requires dually-registered broker-
dealer and futures commission merchants (``BD/FCMs'') that elect to
offer a program to commingle and portfolio margin customer positions in
credit default swaps (``CDS'') in customer accounts maintained in
accordance with Section 4d(f) of the Commodity Exchange Act (``CEA'')
and rules thereunder, to obtain certain agreements and opinions from
its customers regarding the applicable regulatory regime, and to make
certain disclosures to its customers before receiving any money,
securities, or property of a customer to margin, guarantee, or secure
positions consisting of cleared CDS, which include both swaps and
security-based swaps, under a program to commingle and portfolio margin
CDS. The Order also requires BD/FCMs that elect to offer a program to
commingle and portfolio margin CDS positions in customer accounts
maintained in accordance with Section 4d(f) of the CEA and rules
thereunder, to maintain minimum margin levels using a margin
methodology approved by the Commission or the Commission staff.
    When it adopted the Order, the Commission discussed the burden
hours and costs associated with complying with certain provisions of
the Order that contain ``collection of information requirements''
within the meaning of the PRA.\1\ The collection of information
requirements are designed, among other things, to provide appropriate
agreements, disclosures, and opinions to BD/FCM customers to clarify
key aspects of the regulatory framework that will govern their
participation in a program to commingle and portfolio margin CDS
positions and to ensure that appropriate levels of margin are
collected. Because the Order is still in effect, the Commission
believes it is prudent to extend this collection of information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Order, 77 FR at 75221-23.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission estimates that 45 firms may seek to avail themselves
of the conditional exemptive relief provided by the Order and therefore
would be subject to the information collection.\2\ The Commission
estimates that each of the 45 firms that may seek to avail themselves
of the conditional exemptive relief provided by the Order would spend a
total of 3,430 burden hours to comply with the existing collection of
information, calculated as follows: (20 hours to develop a
subordination agreement for each non-affiliate cleared credit default
swap customers in accordance with paragraph IV(b)(1)(ii) of the Order)
x (109 non-affiliate credit default swap customers \3\) + ((20 hours to
develop a subordination agreement for each affiliate cleared credit
default swap customers in accordance with paragraph IV(b)(2)(ii) of the
Order) + (2 hours developing and reviewing the opinion required by
paragraph IV(b)(2)(iii) of the Order)) x (11 affiliate credit default
swap customers) + (1,000 hours to seek the Commission's approval of
margin methodologies under paragraph IV(b)(3) of the Order) + (8 hours
to disclose information to customers under paragraph IV(b)(6) of the
Order) = 3,430 burden hours, or approximately 154,350 burden hours in
the aggregate, calculated as follows: (3,430 burden hours per firm) x
(45 firms) = 154,350 burden hours. Amortized over three years, the
annualized burden hours would be 1,143 hours per firm, or a total of
51,450 for all 45 firms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The Commission bases this estimate on the total number of
entities that are dually registered as broker-dealers and futures
commission merchants. See Financial Data for FCMs as of July 31,
2015, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, available at http://www.cftc.gov/MarketReports/FinancialDataforFCMs/index.htm.
    \3\ Based on information that the Commission receives on a
monthly basis, as well as current projections regarding the
estimated increase in the number of customers per respondent, the
Commission anticipates an average number of credit default swap
customers to be 120 per respondent, 109 of which would be non-
affiliates and 11 of which would be affiliates. The Commission notes
that these estimates are based on current data and the current
regulatory framework.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission further estimates that each respondent will incur a
one-time cost of $8,000 in outside legal cost expenses per firm,
calculated as follows: (200 hours to obtain opinions of counsel from
affiliate cleared credit default swap customers under paragraph
IV(b)(2)(iii) of the Order) x ($400 per hour for outside legal counsel)
= $8,000, for an aggregate burden of $360,000, calculated as follows:
($8,000 in external legal costs per firm) x (45 firms) = $360,000.
Amortized over three years, the annualized capital external cost would
be $2,667 per firm, or a total of $120,000 for all 45 firms.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: Pamela Dyson, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

    Dated: January 25, 2016.
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-01716 Filed 1-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29897-29898]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12237]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2012-0406]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Willamette River, Portland, OR

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the upper deck of the Steel Bridge
across the Willamette River, mile 12.1, at Portland, OR. This deviation
is necessary to accommodate the efficient movement of light rail and
roadway traffic associated with the Starlight Parade in Portland,
Oregon. This deviation allows the upper deck of the Steel Bridge to
remain in the closed position to facilitate efficient movement of event
patrons.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 7 p.m. on June 2, 2012 through
11:30 p.m. June 2, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2012-0406 and are available online
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting

USCG-2012-0406 in the ``Keyword'' box and then clicking ``Search''.
They are also available for inspection or copying at the Docket
Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email the Bridge Administrator, Coast Guard Thirteenth
District; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Trimet of Portland and the Oregon Department
of Transportation have requested that the upper deck of the Steel
Bridge remain closed to vessel traffic to facilitate safe efficient
movement of light rail and roadway traffic associated with the
Starlight Parade. The Steel Bridge crosses the Willamette River at mile
12.1 and is a double-deck lift bridge with a lower lift deck and an
upper lift deck which operate independent of each other. When both
decks are in the down position the bridge provides 26 feet of vertical
clearance above Columbia River Datum 0.0. When the lower deck is in the
up position the bridge provides 71 feet of vertical clearance above
Columbia River Datum 0.0. This deviation does not affect the operating
schedule of the lower deck which opens on signal. Vessels which do not
require an opening of the upper deck of the bridge may continue to
transit beneath the bridge and, if needed, may obtain an opening of the
lower deck of the bridge for passage during this closure period of the
upper deck. Under normal conditions the upper deck of the Steel Bridge
operates in accordance with 33 CFR 117.897(c)(3)(ii) which states that
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday one hour advance notice
shall be given for draw openings and at all other times two hours
advance notice shall be given to obtain an opening. This deviation
period is from 7 p.m. on June 2, 2012 through 11:30 p.m. June 2, 2012.
The deviation allows the upper deck of the Steel Bridge across the
Willamette River, mile 12.1, to remain in the closed position and need
not open for maritime traffic from 7 p.m. through 11:30 p.m. on June 2,
2012. The bridge shall operate in accordance with 33 CFR 117.897 at all
other times. Waterway usage on this stretch of the Willamette River
includes vessels ranging from commercial tug and barge to small
pleasure craft. Mariners will be notified and kept informed of the
bridge's operational status via the Coast Guard Notice to Mariners
publication and Broadcast Notice to Mariners as appropriate. The lift
span will be required to open, if needed, for public vessels of the
United States and Canada and for vessels engaged in emergency response
operations during this closure period.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the designated
time period. This deviation from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: May 7, 2012.
Randall D. Overton,
Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012-12237 Filed 5-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77414-77415]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30142]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 1271

[Docket No. FDA-2014-D-1856]

Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products From
Adipose Tissue: Regulatory Considerations; Draft Guidance for Industry;
Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments on draft guidance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft document entitled ``Human Cells, Tissues, and
Cellular and Tissue-Based Products (HCT/Ps) from Adipose Tissue:
Regulatory Considerations; Draft Guidance for Industry'' dated December
2014. The draft guidance document provides sponsors, clinicians, and
other establishments that manufacture and use adipose tissue, with
recommendations for complying with the regulatory framework for HCT/Ps.
For purposes of applying the HCT/P regulatory framework, FDA considers
connective tissue, including adipose tissue, to be a structural tissue.
This draft guidance is not final nor is it in effect at this time.

DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on this
draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by February 23, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance to the Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development,
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002 or to the Office of the Center Director, Guidance
and Policy Development, Center for Devices and Radiological Health
(CDRH), Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
66, Rm. 5431, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 or you may send an email
request to the Office of Combination Products at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
If you are submitting a written request, send one self-addressed
adhesive label to assist that office in processing your request. The
draft guidance may also be obtained by mail by calling CBER at 1-800-
835-4709 or<PHONE_NUMBER>. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the draft guidance document.
    Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori J. Churchyard, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
240-402-7911; or Angela Krueger, Office of Device Evaluation, Center
for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1666, Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>; or Leigh Hayes, Office of Combination Products,
Office of the Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 5127, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft document entitled
``Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products (HCT/Ps)
from Adipose Tissue: Regulatory Considerations; Draft Guidance for
Industry'' dated December 2014. FDA has recently received numerous
inquiries regarding HCT/Ps from adipose tissues. This draft guidance
document provides sponsors, clinicians, and other establishments that
manufacture and use HCT/Ps from adipose tissue with the Agency's
current

thinking with respect to regulatory considerations for adipose tissue.
    The draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent FDA's current thinking on this topic. It does
not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not
operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used
if such approach satisfies the requirement of the applicable statutes
and regulations.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    The draft guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
collections of information in 21 CFR part 1271 have been approved under
OMB control number 0910-0543.

III. Comments

    The draft guidance is being distributed for comment purposes only
and is not intended for implementation at this time. Interested persons
may submit either electronic comments regarding this document to http://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in
the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

IV. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the draft guidance
at either http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/default.htm or http://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/default.htm or http://www.regulations.gov. Persons unable to download an electronic copy of
the draft guidance entitled ``Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and
Tissue-Based Products from Adipose Tissue: Regulatory Considerations;
Draft Guidance for Industry,'' may send an email request to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>to receive an electronic copy of the document.

    Dated: December 18, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-30142 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: June 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 104)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 30270-30272]
[DOCID:fr01jn10-3]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0219; Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-14-AD;
Amendment 39-16315; AD 2010-11-10]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca Astazou XIV B and XIV H
Turboshaft Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    Investigation of an uncommanded in-flight shutdown (IFSD)
revealed that a third stage turbine wheel rupture was not contained
by the turbine casings. The released portion consisted of a turbine
blade together with the rim piece immediately below the blade. The
rim piece was bounded by two adjacent axial slots and a fatigue
crack that had developed between the holes in which the slots
terminate. The slots and holes, which are closed by riveted plugs,
were introduced by modification AB 173 in order to improve the
vibration characteristics of the turbine wheel. Modification AB 208
brings an improvement to modification AB 173 by changing only the
riveting detail. SN 283 72 0805 provides instructions for re-boring
the holes at overhaul or repair in order to improve their surface
condition. A manufacturing process modification has been introduced
to improve the surface condition of these holes in third stage
turbine wheels. Wheels subject to the improved manufacturing process
have S/Ns outside the range specified in Table 1. Although there is
only one known event, and although it resulted only in an
uncommanded IFSD, with no damage to the aircraft, the possibility
exists that additional events may occur, potentially involving
damage to the aircraft.

We are issuing this AD to prevent uncontained failures of the third
stage turbine wheel, which could result in damage to the helicopter.

DATES: This AD becomes effective July 6, 2010. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in this AD as of July 6, 2010.

ADDRESSES: The Docket Operations office is located at Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-
0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Dickert, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on March 30, 2010 (75
FR 15627). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states that:

    Investigation of an uncommanded IFSD revealed that a third stage
turbine wheel rupture was not contained by the turbine casings. The
released portion consisted of a turbine blade together with the rim
piece immediately below the blade. The rim piece was bounded by two
adjacent axial slots and a fatigue crack that had developed between
the holes in which the slots terminate. The slots and holes, which
are closed by riveted plugs, were introduced by modification AB 173
in order to improve the vibration characteristics of the turbine
wheel. Modification AB 208 brings an improvement to modification AB
173 by changing only the riveting detail. SB 283 72 0805 provides
instructions for re-boring the holes at overhaul or repair in order
to improve their surface condition. A manufacturing process
modification has been introduced to improve the surface condition of
these holes in third stage turbine wheels. Wheels subject to the
improved manufacturing process have S/Ns outside the range specified
in Table 1. Although there is only one known event, and although it
resulted only in an uncommanded IFSD, with no damage to the
aircraft, the possibility exists that additional events may occur,
potentially involving damage to the aircraft.
    To address the unsafe condition, EASA issued AD 2009-0136,
mandating inspection of certain third stage turbine wheels and
removal of any damaged wheel. The wheels to be inspected were those
whose cycles since new (CSN) would exceed 2,000 by February 1, 2011.
Following additional research by Turbomeca on crack initiation and
growth, this AD mandates inspections based on new criteria and
removal of any damaged wheel.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will
affect about three Astazou engines installed on products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take about 5 work-hours per
engine to comply with this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-
hour. We anticipate no parts to be required. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of the AD on U.S. operators to be $1,275.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.

    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (phone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is provided in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2010-11-10 Turbomeca: Amendment 39-16315. Docket No. FAA-2010-0219;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-14-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective July 6,
2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Turbomeca Astazou XIV B and XIV H
turboshaft engines with the following part number (P/N) third stage
turbine wheels that incorporate modification AB 173 (Turbomeca
Service Bulletin (SB) No. 283 72 0091) or modification AB 208
(Turbomeca SB No. 283 72 0117), but that do not incorporate
Turbomeca SB No. 283 72 805:
    (1) Third stage turbine wheels P/N<PHONE_NUMBER>, all serial
numbers (S/Ns);
    (2) Third stage turbine wheels P/N<PHONE_NUMBER>, all S/Ns;
    (3) Third stage turbine wheels P/N<PHONE_NUMBER>, all S/Ns;
    (4) Third stage turbine wheels P/N<PHONE_NUMBER>, of the S/Ns
listed in Appendix 1 of Turbomeca Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB)
No. 283 72 0804, Version C, dated October 23, 2009.
    (5) These engines are installed on, but not limited to, single-
engine Aerospatiale AS319B ``Alouette III'' and AS342J ``Gazelle''
helicopters.

Reason

    (d) European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2010-0004,
dated January 5, 2010, states:

    Investigation of an uncommanded in-flight shutdown (IFSD)
revealed that a third stage turbine wheel rupture was not contained
by the turbine casings. The released portion consisted of a turbine
blade together with the rim piece immediately below the blade. The
rim piece was bounded by two adjacent axial slots and a fatigue
crack that had developed between the holes in which the slots
terminate. The slots and holes, which are closed by riveted plugs,
were introduced by modification AB 173 in order to improve the
vibration characteristics of the turbine wheel. Modification AB 208
brings an improvement to modification AB 173 by changing only the
riveting detail. SN 283 72 0805 provides instructions for re-boring
the holes at overhaul or repair in order to improve their surface
condition. A manufacturing process modification has been introduced
to improve the surface condition of these holes in third stage
turbine wheels. Wheels subject to the improved manufacturing process
have S/Ns outside the range specified in Table 1. Although there is
only one known event, and although it resulted only in an
uncommanded IFSD, with no damage to the aircraft, the possibility
exists that additional events may occur, potentially involving
damage to the aircraft.
    To address the unsafe condition, EASA issued AD 2009-0136,
mandating inspection of certain third stage turbine wheels and
removal of any damaged wheel. The wheels to be inspected were those
whose cycles since new (CSN) would exceed 2,000 by February 1, 2011.
Following additional research by Turbomeca on crack initiation and
growth, this AD mandates inspections based on new criteria and
removal of any damaged wheel.

    We are issuing this AD to prevent uncontained failures of the
third stage turbine wheel, which could result in damage to the
helicopter.

Actions and Compliance

    (e) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) For any affected third stage turbine wheel that on the
effective date of this AD has accumulated fewer than 500 cycles-
since-last-overhaul or repair, or since-new if the engine has never
been overhauled or repaired:
    (i) Within 300 additional cycles, perform a dye penetrant
inspection on the rear face of the third stage turbine wheel.
    (ii) Use Section 2, Instructions to Be Incorporated, of
Turbomeca MSB No. 283 72 0804, Version C, dated October 23, 2009, to
do the inspection.
    (iii) Perform a second dye penetrant inspection when the engine
has accumulated between 450 and 550 cycles from the first
inspection.
    (2) For any affected third stage turbine wheel that on the
effective date of this AD, has accumulated 500 or more but fewer
than 700 cycles-since-last-overhaul or repair, or since-new if the
engine has never been overhauled or repaired:
    (i) Within 200 additional cycles, perform a dye penetrant
inspection on the rear face of the third stage turbine wheel.
    (ii) Use Section 2, Instructions to Be Incorporated, of
Turbomeca MSB No. 283 72 0804, Version C, dated October 23, 2009, to
do the inspection.
    (3) For any affected third stage turbine wheel that on the
effective date of this AD, has accumulated 700 or more but fewer
than 1,200 cycles-since-last-overhaul or repair, or since-new if the
engine has never been overhauled or repaired:
    (i) Within 150 additional cycles, perform a dye penetrant
inspection on the rear face of the third stage turbine wheel.
    (ii) Use Section 2, Instructions to Be Incorporated, of
Turbomeca MSB No. 283 72 0804, Version C, dated October 23, 2009, to
do the inspection.
    (4) If any crack indication is found, then before further
flight, remove the third stage turbine wheel from service.
    (5) For any affected third stage turbine wheel that on the
effective date of this AD has accumulated 1,200 or more cycles-
since-last-overhaul or repair, or since-new if the engine has never
been overhauled or repaired, no action is required.

FAA AD Differences

    (f) This AD differs from the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information (MCAI) and or service information as follows:
    (1) EASA AD 2010-0004, dated January 5, 2010, requires removing
the engine from service before further flight if a third stage
turbine wheel is found cracked.
    (2) This AD requires removing the third stage turbine wheel from
service before further flight if a third stage turbine wheel is
found cracked.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

    (g) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI EASA AD 2010-0004, dated January 5, 2010, for
related information.
    (i) Contact Kevin Dickert, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for more information about this AD.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (j) You must use Turbomeca Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 283 72
0804, Version C, dated October 23, 2009, to do the actions required
by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Turbomeca, 40220 Tarnos, France; telephone (33) 05 59 74 40 00, fax
(33) 05 59 74 45 15.
    (3) You may review copies at the FAA, New England Region, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on May 19, 2010.
Tracy Murphy,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-12539 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66690-66691]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24039]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER23-277-000]

Westlake US 2 LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Westlake US 2 LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is November 21, 2022.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.

    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 31, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-24039 Filed 11-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


MEMORANDUM

DATE: 11/20/14

FROM: 		Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4

TO:CLEAN POWER PLAN FOR EXISTING POWER PLANTS; DOCKET ID: OAR - 2013-0602

SUBJECT:DISCUSSION OF THE CLEAN POWER Plan with Local Environmental Groups

SUMMARY:

EPA Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to attendees at a meeting of local environmental groups in Palm Beach, Florida, on 7/24/14.  The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA Bryan Myers/EPA R4

External Stakeholders Barbara Eriv, League of Women Voters Palm Beach County Tara Bardi and Mary Crider, Arthur R. Marshall Foundation Approximately 250 in attendance


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 37 (Monday, February 25, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6039-6040]
[FR Doc No: 2019-03206]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-85167; File No. SR-CBOE-2019-011]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating
To Amend a Fee for the S&P Select Sector Index Options (``Sector Index
Options'')

February 20, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on February 7, 2019, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``Cboe
Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') [sic]
proposes to amend a fee for the S&P Select Sector Index options
(``Sector Index options''). The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to waive the transaction fee for Clearing
Trading Permit Holder Proprietary (origin code ``F'' and ``L'')
facilitation orders in Sector Index options, executed in open outcry or
electronically via AIM or as a Qualified Contingent Cross (``QCC'') or
CFLEX transaction, through June 30, 2019. By way of background
``facilitation orders'' are defined as any order in which a Clearing
Trading Permit Holder (``F'' origin code) or Non-Trading Permit Holder
Affiliate (``L'' origin code) is contra to any other origin code order,
provided the same executing broker and clearing firm are on both sides
of the transaction (for open outcry) or both sides of a paired order
(for orders executed electronically).\3\ Currently, the Fees Schedule
provides that Clearing Trading Permit Holder Proprietary orders in
Sector Index options will be assessed $0.25 per contract. The Exchange
recognizes however, that Clearing Trading Permit Holders can be an
important source of liquidity when they facilitate their own customers'
trading activity and, as such, the Exchange proposes to apply a waiver
of Clearing Trading Permit Holder Proprietary transaction fees for
facilitation orders through June 30, 2019. Accordingly the Exchange
proposes to update the Fees Schedule, including the Specified
Proprietary Index Options Rate Table--Underlying Symbol List A and
Sector Indexes, along with Footnotes 11 and 22 of the Fees Schedule, to
reflect the proposed fee waiver.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Cboe Options Fees Schedule, Footnote 11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') [sic] and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in
particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\4\
Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \5\ requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitation transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\6\ which requires that
Exchange rules provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its Trading Permit Holders and other
persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Particularly, the Exchange believes the proposed waiver of Clearing
Trading Permit Holder Proprietary transaction fees for facilitation
orders in Sector Index options is reasonable because it will exempt
such orders from being assessed a fee. The Exchange believes that this
is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because a similar waiver
also applies to other products, including other proprietary index
products (e.g., MXEA, MXEF, DJX and XSP).\7\ Further, the Exchange
recognizes that Clearing Trading Permit Holders can be an important
source of liquidity when they facilitate their own customers' trading
activity. Such trades add transparency and promote price discovery to
the benefit of all market participants. Moreover, the exemption from
any fee for Sector Index facilitation orders executed in AIM, open
outcry, or as a CFLEX transaction will apply to all such orders.
Lastly, the Exchange notes that the proposal to waive facilitation fees
for Clearing Trading Permit Holder Proprietary orders through June 30,
2019 is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory as the
Exchange has previously exempted certain transaction fees for newly
listed options products for a period of time in order to promote and
encourage trading in such products.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Cboe Fees Schedule, ``Equity Options Rate Table, ``ETF
and ETN Options Rate Table'' and ``Index Options Rate Table--All
Index Products Excluding Underlying Symbol List A and Sector
Indexes'', all of which provide a $0.00 facilitation fee for origin
code ``F'' and ``L'' orders.
    \8\ See Securities and Exchange Release 34-77547 (April 6, 2016)
81 FR 21611 (April 12, 2016) (SR-CBOE-2016-021) (Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Establish
Fees for Options That Overlie a Reduced Value of the FTSE 100 Index
and the FTSE China 50 Index).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose

any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intramarket
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because the proposed rule change will apply to all
Clearing Trading Permit Holder Proprietary facilitation orders
uniformly. Additionally, while the proposed transaction waiver applies
only to Clearing Trading Permit Holders Proprietary facilitation
orders, Clearing Trading Permit Holders can be an important source of
liquidity when they facilitate their own customers' trading activity,
as further discussed above. Additionally, such trades add transparency
and promote price discovery to the benefit of all market participants.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because Sector
Index options will be exclusively listed on Cboe Options. To the extent
that the proposed change makes Cboe Options a more attractive
marketplace for market participants at other exchanges, such market
participants are welcome to become Cboe Options market participants.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \10\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2019-011 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2019-011. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2019-011 and should be submitted on
or before March 18, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-03206 Filed 2-22-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: March 18, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 51)]
[Notices]
[Page 11622-11624]
[DOCID:fr18mr09-95]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59567; File No. SR-ISE-2009-12]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to Fee Changes

March 12, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on March 6, 2009, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the
``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change, as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which items have been prepared by the
self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice
to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The ISE is proposing to amend its Schedule of Fees to establish
fees for transactions in options on 2 Premium Products.\3\ The text of
the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site
(http://www.ise.com), at the principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Premium Products is defined in the Schedule of Fees as the
products enumerated therein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to amend its Schedule of Fees to
establish fees for transactions in options on the iShares U.S.
Preferred Stock Index Fund (``PFF'') \4\ and the United States 12 Month
Oil Fund, LP (``USL'').\5\ The Exchange represents that PFF and USL are
eligible for options trading because they constitute ``Exchange-Traded
Fund Shares,'' as defined by ISE Rule 502(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ iShares[supreg] is a registered trademark of Barclays Global
Investors, N.A. (``BGI''). ``Standard & Poor's[supreg]'' and
``S&P[supreg]'' are trademarks of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
(``McGraw-Hill'') and have been licensed for use for certain
purposes by BGI. All other trademarks and service marks are the
property of their respective owners. iShares U.S. Preferred Stock
Index Fund (``PFF'') is not sponsored, endorsed, issued, sold or
promoted by Standard & Poor's, (``S&P''), a division of McGraw-Hill,
and S&P makes no representation regarding the advisability of
investing in PFF. BGI and S&P have not licensed or authorized ISE to
(i) engage in the creation, listing, provision of a market for
trading, marketing, and promotion of options on PFF or (ii) to use
and refer to any of their trademarks or service marks in connection
with the listing, provision of a market for trading, marketing, and
promotion of options on PFF or with making disclosures concerning
options on PFF under any applicable federal or state laws, rules or
regulations. BGI and S&P do not sponsor, endorse, or promote such
activity by ISE, and are not affiliated in any manner with ISE.
    \5\ The United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (``USL'') is
distributed by ALPS Distributors, Inc. (``ALPS''), administered by
Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (``BBH'') and United States Commodity
Fund, LLC (``USCF'') is the General Partner. ALPS, BBH and USCF have
not licensed or authorized ISE to (i) engage in the creation,
listing, provision of a market for trading, marketing, and promotion
of options on USL or (ii) to use and refer to any of their
trademarks or service marks in connection with the listing,
provision of a market for trading, marketing, and promotion of
options on USL or with making disclosures concerning options on USL
under any applicable federal or state laws, rules or regulations.
ALPS, BBH and USCF do not sponsor, endorse, or promote such activity
by ISE, and are not affiliated in any manner with ISE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    All of the applicable fees covered by this filing are identical to
fees charged by the Exchange for all other Premium Products.
Specifically, the Exchange is proposing to adopt an execution fee for
all transactions in options on PFF and USL.\6\ The amount of the
execution fee for products covered by this filing shall be $0.18 per
contract for all Public Customer Orders \7\ and $0.20 per contract for
all Firm Proprietary orders. The amount of the execution fee for all
ISE Market Maker transactions shall be equal to the execution fee
currently charged by the Exchange for ISE Market Maker transactions in
equity options.\8\ Finally, the amount of the execution fee for all
non-ISE Market Maker transactions shall be $0.45 per contract.\9\
Further, since options on PFF and USL are multiply-listed, the
Exchange's Payment for Order Flow fee shall apply to all these
products. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change will further
the Exchange's goal of introducing new products to the marketplace that
are competitively priced.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ These fees will be charged only to Exchange members. Under a
pilot program that is set to expire on July 31, 2009, these fees
will also be charged to Linkage Principal Orders (``Linkage P
Orders'') and Linkage Principal Acting as Agent Orders (``Linkage P/
A Orders''). The amount of the execution fee charged by the Exchange
for Linkage P Orders and Linkage P/A Orders is $0.27 per contract
side and $0.18 per contract side, respectively. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 58143 (July 11, 2008), 73 FR 41388 (July
18, 2008) (SR-ISE-2008-52).
    \7\ Public Customer Order is defined in Exchange Rule 100(a)(39)
as an order for the account of a Public Customer. Public Customer is
defined in Exchange Rule 100(a)(38) as a person or entity that is
not a broker or dealer in securities.
    \8\ The Exchange applies a sliding scale, between $0.01 and
$0.18 per contract side, based on the number of contracts an ISE
market maker trades in a month.
    \9\ The amount of the execution fee for non-ISE Market Maker
transactions executed in the Exchange's Facilitation and
Solicitation Mechanisms is $0.20 per contract.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, the Exchange proposes to amend its Schedule of Fees to
remove the surcharge fee previously adopted for transactions in options
on the iShares S&P MidCap 400 Index Fund (``IJH''), the iShares S&P
SmallCap 600 Index Fund (``IJR''),\10\ and the iShares S&P SmallCap 600
Value Index Fund (``IJS'').\11\ The Exchange is proposing to remove the
surcharge fee from its Schedule of Fees because it no longer pays a
license fee to Standard & Poor's in connection with transactions in
options on IJH, IJR and IJS. Accordingly, there is no longer a need for
this surcharge fee. The Exchange will, however, continue to charge an
execution fee for transactions in options on IJH, IJR and IJS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-49557 (April 12,
2004), 69 FR 20955 (April 19, 2004).
    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-54414 (September
7, 2006), 71 FR 54546 (September 15, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\12\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\13\ in particular, in that
it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among its members and other persons using
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3) of the Act \14\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \15\ thereunder. At any
time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is
consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the
following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-ISE-2009-12 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-ISE-2009-12. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with
respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission,
and all written communications relating to the proposed rule changes
between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be
withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's
Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on
official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies
of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of ISE. All comments received will be posted without
change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information
from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to
make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-
ISE-2009-12 and should be submitted on or before April 8, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-5779 Filed 3-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 198 (Thursday, October 13, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70722-70723]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24699]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-79062; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2016-64]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of
Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1
and 2, To List and Trade Shares of the AdvisorShares KIM Korea Equity
ETF

October 6, 2016.

I. Introduction

    On May 2, 2016, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act

of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule
change to list and trade shares of the AdvisorShares KIM Korea Equity
ETF under NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.600. On May 13, 2016, the Exchange
submitted Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\3\ The
Commission published notice of the proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1, in the Federal Register on May 23, 2016.\4\ On May 23,
2016, the Exchange submitted Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule
change.\5\ On July 7, 2016, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\6\
the Commission designated a longer period within which to approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule
change.\7\ On August 18, 2016, the Commission instituted proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \8\ to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\9\ The Commission
received no comments on the proposed rule change. On September 28,
2016, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Amendment No. 1 replaced and superseded the original filing
in its entirety. Amendment No. 1 is available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2016-64/nysearca201664-1.pdf.
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-77847 (May 17,
2016), 81 FR 32364.
    \5\ Amendment No. 2 replaced and superseded the original filing
in its entirety. Amendment No. 2 is available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2016-64/nysearca201664-2.pdf.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78240, 81 FR 45332
(July 13, 2016).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78614, 81 FR 57981
(August 24, 2016).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-24699 Filed 10-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 28, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18253-18255]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06314]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2023-0257]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Missouri River Mile Markers 175.5-176.5, Jefferson
City, MO

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
all navigable waters in the Missouri River at Mile Marker (MM) 175.5 to
176.5. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment from all potential hazards associated with
electrical line work. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector Upper Mississippi River (COTP) or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from March 28, 2023
through April 21, 2023. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from March 22, 2023, until March 28, 2023.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2023-0257 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email MSTC Nathaniel Dibley, Sector Upper Mississippi River
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 314-269-
2550, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of The Port Sector Upper Mississippi River
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MM Mile marker
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable. We must
establish this temporary safety zone immediately to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created by
the electrical work and lack sufficient time to provide a reasonable
comment period and then consider those comments before issuing the
rule.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying this rule would be
contrary to the public interest because immediate action is needed to
respond to the potential safety hazards associated with the ongoing
construction work.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Sector Upper
Mississippi River (COTP) has determined that potential hazards
associated with electrical line work will be a safety concern for
anyone operating or transiting within the Missouri River from MM 175.5-
176.5. This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment in the navigable waters within the safety zone while
electrical line work is being conducted.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    Electrical line work will be occurring near MM 175.5-176.5
beginning March 24, 2023. The safety zone is designed to protect
waterway users until work is complete.
    No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative. A designated representative is a commissioned, warrant,
or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) assigned to units under
the operational control of USCG Sector Upper Mississippi River. To seek
permission to enter, contact the COTP or a designated representative
via VHF-FM channel 16, or through USCG Sector Upper Mississippi River
at<PHONE_NUMBER>. Persons and vessels permitted to enter the safety zone
must comply with all lawful orders or directions issued by the COTP or
designated representative. The COTP or a designated representative will
inform the public of the effective period for the safety zone as well
as any changes in the dates and times of enforcement, as well as
reductions in the size of the safety zone as conditions improve,
through Local Notice to Mariners (LNMs), Broadcast Notices to Mariners
(BNMs), and/or Safety Marine Information Broadcast (SMIB), as
appropriate.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on a safety zone
located on the Missouri River at MM 175.5-176.5, near Jefferson City,
MO. The Safety Zone is expected to be active only during the hours of 9
a.m. through 4 p.m., or only when work is being conducted, every day
until April 21, 2023.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator because the zone will be enforced only when
work is being conducted.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone encompassing the width of the Missouri River at MM 175.5-
176.5. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01,
Rev. 1. A

Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security Measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T08-0257 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T08-0257  Safety Zone; Missouri River, Mile Markers 175.5-
176.5, Jefferson City, MO

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: all navigable
waters within Missouri Mile Markers (MM) 175.5-176.5.
    (b) Enforcement period. This section will be subject to enforcement
from March 24, 2023, through April 21, 2023.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general safety zone
regulations in Sec.  165.23, entry of persons or vessels into this
safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section is prohibited
unless authorized by the COTP or a designated representative. A
designated representative is a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
of the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) assigned to units under the operational
control of USCG Sector Upper Mississippi River.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or a designated
representative via VHF-FM channel 16, or through USCG Sector Upper
Mississippi River at<PHONE_NUMBER>. Persons and vessels permitted to
enter the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions
issued by the COTP or designated representative
    (d) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public of the effective period for the
safety zone as well as any changes in the dates and times of
enforcement, as well as reductions in size or scope of the safety zone
as ice or flood conditions improve, through Local Notice to Mariners
(LNMs), Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs), and/or Safety Marine
Information Broadcast (SMIB) as appropriate.

    Dated: March 22, 2023.
D.J. Every,
Alternate, Captain of the Port, U.S. Coast Guard, Sector Upper
Mississippi River.
[FR Doc. 2023-06314 Filed 3-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: February 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 24)]
[Notices]
[Page 6020-6021]
[DOCID:fr05fe10-65]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Competing Preliminary Permit Applications Accepted for
Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing
Applications

January 29, 2010.

Brookfield Power United States      Project No. 13077-000.
 Generation Development, LLC.
Robertson Energy Group, LLC.......  Project No. 13081-000.

    Brookfield Power United States Generation Development, LLC
(Brookfield Power) and Robertson Energy Group, LLC (Robertson Energy)
filed preliminary permit applications, pursuant to section 4(f) of the
Federal Power Act, proposing to study the feasibility of the George W.
Andrews Hydroelectric Project located at the existing George W. Andrews
Lock and Dam on the Chattahoochee River, Early County, Georgia, and
Huston County, Alabama, near the town of Columbia, Alabama. The
projects would occupy federal lands under the jurisdiction of the U. S.
Army Corps of Engineers. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if
issued, is to grant the permit holder priority to file a license
application during the permit term. A preliminary permit does not
authorize the permit holder to perform any land disturbing activities
or otherwise enter upon lands or waters owned by others without the
owners' express permission.
    The proposed Projects description:
    The proposed George W. Andrews Lock and Dam Hydroelectric Project
by Brookfield Power (Project No. 13077-000, filed on November 16,
2007), would be built on the Alabama side and would consist of: (1) A
new powerhouse containing four new pit turbine-generators each rated at
6 MW for a total combined plant capacity of 24 MW; (2) an intake
channel and a tailrace channel; (3) an approximately ten miles long
transmission line connecting the powerhouse to an existing substation;
and (4) appurtenant facilities. The proposed project would have an
average annual generation of 89 gigawatt-hours.
    The proposed George W. Andrews Hydroelectric Project by Robertson
Energy (Project No. 13081-000, filed on November 21, 2007), would be
built on the Alabama side and would consist of: (1) A new powerhouse
containing four new turbine-generators each rated at 4 MW for a total
combined plant capacity of 16 MW; (2) an intake channel and a

tailrace channel; (3) an approximately ten miles long transmission line
connecting the powerhouse to an existing substation; and (4)
appurtenant facilities. The proposed project would have an average
annual generation of 75 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicants Contact: For Brookfield Power: Mr. Jeffrey M. Auser,
P.E., BPUS Generation Development LLC, 225 Greenfield Parkway, Suite
201, Liverpool, NY 13088, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. For Robertson
Energy: Mr. James R. Robertson, 5702 Reno Court, Boonsboro, MD 21713,
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Sergiu Serban,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site (http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ferconline.asp) under the
``eFiling'' link. For a simpler method of submitting text only
comments, click on ``Quick Comment.'' For assistance, please contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>call toll-free at
(866) 208-3676; or, for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the
Commission strongly encourages electronic filing, documents may also be
paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an original and eight copies to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-13077-000, or 13081-000) in the docket
number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-2485 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19137-19138]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09123]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2018-0042]

Notice of Application for Approval To Discontinue or Modify a
Railroad Signal System

    Under part 235 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
and 49 U.S.C. 20502(a), this document provides the public notice that
on April 20, 2018, CSX Transportation (CSX) petitioned

the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) seeking approval to
discontinue or modify a signal system. FRA assigned the petition Docket
Number FRA-2018-0042.
    Applicant: CSX Transportation, Mr. Carl Walker, Chief Engineer
Communications & Signals, 500 Water Street, Speed Code J--350,
Jacksonville, FL 32202.
    CSX seeks approval to discontinue the signal system on the main
tracks between control point (CP) Strick, milepost (MP) OWI 208.1 on
the EK Subdivision, Winchester, KY, and CP Blackey, MP OVB 267.1 on the
Rockhouse Subdivision, Blackey, KY. CSX proposes to discontinue the CP-
511 and TC-510 Rules in the track segment and operate under TWC-D-505
Rules.
    CSX states the reason for the proposed change is that CP-511 and
TC-510 Rules are no longer needed for present day operation.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation's (DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations
Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested parties
desire an opportunity for oral comment and a public hearing, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Website: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
    Communications received by June 15, 2018 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments received after that date will be
considered if practicable.
    Anyone can search the electronic form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). In
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public
to better inform its processes. DOT posts these comments, without edit,
including any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/
ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See also https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice for the
privacy notice of regulations.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-09123 Filed 4-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 24, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 75079]
[FR Doc No: C1-2020-25391]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90409; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2020-95]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending the Fees
for NYSE Arca BBO and NYSE Arca Trades by Modifying the Application of
the Access Fee and Amending the Fees for NYSE Arca Trades by Adopting a
Waiver Applicable to the Redistribution Fee

November 12, 2020.

Correction

    In Notice document 2020-25391, appearing on pages 73522-73533, in
the issue of Wednesday, November 18, 2020, make the following
correction:
    On page 73533, in the first column, in the thirty-eighth line, the
entry ``December 9, 2021'' is corrected to read ``December 9, 2020''.

[FR Doc. C1-2020-25391 Filed 11-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301-00-D