[Federal Register: August 29, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 169)]
[Notices]
[Page 50956-50957]
[DOCID:fr29au08-65]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP07-417-002]

Texas Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Application

August 22, 2008.
    Take notice that on August 22, 2008, Texas Gas Transmission, LLC
(Texas Gas), 3800 Frederica Street, Owensboro, Kentucky 42301, filed in
the above referenced docket an application pursuant to section 7(c) of
the Natural Gas Act (NGA), and section 157 of the Commission's
regulations to amend the certificate of public convenience and
necessity issued on May 2, 2008, in Docket No. CP07-417-000.
Specifically, Texas Gas requests authorization to increase in the
maximum design capability of the Fayetteville Lateral, located in
Arkansas and Mississippi, from 841,000 MMBtu per day to 967,000 MMBtu/
d, all as more fully set forth in the application which is on file with
the Commission and open to public inspection. The filing may also be
viewed on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link.
Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket
number field to access the document. For assistance, please contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll

free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to Kathy
D. Fort, Manager, Certificates and Tariffs, Texas Gas Transmission,
LLC, 3800 Frederica Street, Owensboro, Kentucky 42301 at (270) 688-
6825.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 14 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentors will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: August 29, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-20053 Filed 8-28-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


From:
Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Monday, November 16, 2015 2:23 PM
To:
David Ailor<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
RE: QUESTION FROM TODAY'S MEETING

No timeline yet. We are just starting to review the options I drafted Friday. Chuck was out. Facilities should be able to send EPA the CBI information by end of this week or early next week? We will need this before we can go forward.

Attached:
--Document from Steff on reference detection limit development and also
==Attendee list without the two Sun coke, and then EPA people: Steff Johnson and Jason de Wees.

_____________________________________________________________
Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D 243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

<<December 13 Westlin_Merrill Detection Limit Memo.pdf>>
<<meeting-11-16-15-coke-AT-EPA.pdf>>

From: David Ailor<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 2:15 PM
To: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: QUESTION FOROM TODAY'S MEETING

Donna Lee: Thanks again for meeting with us today.  We greatly appreciated the time devoted your better understanding the challenges facing the industry.

Are you on a specific timeline to brief your management on the options you mentioned.  If so, what's that timeline, so we can plan accordingly?

Thanks, DCA

David C. Ailor, P.E.
President
American Coke and Coal Chemicals Institute
25 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20001
Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>
eFax.:<PHONE_NUMBER>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>www.accci.org


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 89484-89485]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28454]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-99210; File No. SR-MIAX-2023-23]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities
Exchange, LLC; Notice of Designation of Longer Period for Commission
Action on Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove
Proposed Rule Change To Increase Fees for the ToM Market Data Product
and Establish Fees for the cToM Market Data Product

December 20, 2023.
    On June 7, 2023, Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC
(``MIAX'' or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change (File Number SR-MIAX-2023-23) to
increase fees for the MIAX Top of Market (``ToM'') market data product
and establish fees for the MIAX Complex Top of Market (``cToM'') market
data product. The proposed rule change was immediately effective upon
filing with the Commission pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act.\3\ The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on June 26, 2023.\4\ On August 3, 2023, the Commission
issued an order temporarily suspending the proposed rule change
pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act \5\ and simultaneously
instituting proceedings under section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \6\ to
determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). A proposed rule change may take
effect upon filing with the Commission if it is designated by the
exchange as ``establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by the self-regulatory organization on any person, whether
or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory organization.''
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97768 (June 20,
2023), 88 FR 41423 (``Notice'').
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98050, 88 FR 53941
(August 9, 2023) (``Order Instituting Proceedings'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \8\ provides that, after initiating
proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change not later than 180 days after the
date of publication of notice of filing of the proposed rule change.
The Commission may extend the period for issuing an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change, however, by not more than 60
days if the Commission determines that a longer period is appropriate
and publishes the reasons for such determination. The proposed rule
change was published for notice and comment in the Federal Register on
June 26, 2023.\9\ December 23, 2023 is 180 days from that date, and
February 21, 2024 is 240 days from that date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \9\ See Notice, supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the proposed
rule change. Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to section 19(b)(2)
of the Act,\10\ designates February 21, 2024 as the date by which the
Commission shall either approve or disapprove the proposed rule change
(File No. SR-MIAX-2023-23).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Christina Z. Milnor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-28454 Filed 12-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24883-24885]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10076]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0266; FRL-9665-4]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San
Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the San Joaquin
Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern
oxides of nitrogen (NOX) from solid fuel fired boilers,
steam generators and process heaters. We are approving a local rule
that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this
proposal and plan to follow with a final action.

DATES: Any comments must arrive by May 29, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-

OAR-2012-0266, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
    Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov, some
information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location
(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be publicly
available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours
with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Steckel, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4115<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rule did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of this rule?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule?
II. EPA's Evaluation
    A. How is EPA evaluating the rule?
    B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rule
III. EPA's Proposed Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rule did the State submit?

    Table 1 identifies the rule addressed by this proposal with the
date that it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB).

                                             Table 1--Submitted Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Local agency                  Rule No.              Rule title              Amended     Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SJVUAPCD................................         4352  Solid Fuel Fired Boilers, Steam     12/15/11     02/23/12
                                                        Generators and Process Heaters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 13, 2012, EPA determined that the submittal for SJVUAPCD
Rule 4352 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix V,
which must be met before formal EPA review.

B. Are there other versions of this rule?

    We finalized a limited approval and limited disapproval of an
earlier version of Rule 4352 on October 1, 2010 (75 FR 60623). That
action incorporated Rule 4352 into the California SIP, including those
provisions identified as deficient.

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule?

    NOX emissions help produce ground-level ozone, smog and
particulate matter, which harm human health and the environment.
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States to submit regulations that
control NOX emissions. Rule 4352 limits NOX and
carbon monoxide (CO) emissions from solid fuel fired boilers, steam
generators and process heaters. EPA's technical support document (TSD)
has more information about this rule.

II. EPA's Evaluation

A. How is EPA evaluating the rule?

    Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the
Act), must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for
each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines
(CTG) document and each major source of NOX or VOC emissions
in ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate or above (see CAA
sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f)), and must not relax existing
requirements (see CAA sections 110(l) and 193). Section 172(c)(1) of
the Act also requires implementation of all reasonably available
control measures (RACM) as expeditiously as practicable in
nonattainment areas.
    Because the San Joaquin Valley (SJV) area is designated
nonattainment for the 1997 and 2006 fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and
for the 1-hour and 8-hour ozone NAAQS (see 40 CFR 81.305), the RACM
requirement in CAA section 172(c)(1) applies to this area.\1\ In
addition, because SJV is classified as ``extreme'' nonattainment for
the 1-hour and 8-hour ozone NAAQS (see 40 CFR 81.305), the specific
RACT requirement in CAA sections 182(b)(2) and (f) applies to all major
sources of NOX or VOC in the SJV area. We are evaluating
Rule 4352 for compliance with the NOX RACT requirement in
CAA section 182 because the rule applies to major NOX
emission sources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ EPA generally takes action on a RACM demonstration as part
of our action on the State's attainment demonstration for the
relevant NAAQS, based on an evaluation of the control measures
submitted as a whole and their overall potential to advance the
applicable attainment date in the area. See, e.g., 76 FR 69896
(November 9, 2011) (final rule partially approving and partially
disapproving PM2.5 attainment plan for SJV); 77 FR 12652
(March 1, 2012) (final rule approving 8-hour ozone attainment plan
for SJV).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate
enforceability and RACT requirements consistently include the
following:
    1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the
Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,'' 57
FR 13498 (April 16, 1992) (the General Preamble) and 57 FR 18070 (April
28, 1992) (Appendices).
    2. ``State Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to the
General Preamble; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 Implementation of
Title I; Proposed Rule,'' 57 FR 55620, November 25, 1992 (the
NOX Supplement).
    2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook).

    3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).
    4. ``Determination of Reasonably Available Control Technology and
Best Available Retrofit Control Technology for Industrial,
Institutional, and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process
Heaters,'' CARB, July 18, 1991.
    5. ``Alternative Control Techniques Document--NOX
Emissions from Industrial/Commercial/Institutional (ICI) Boilers,'' US
EPA 453/R-94-022, March 1994.
    6. ``Alternative Control Techniques Document-- NOX
Emissions from Utility Boilers,'' US EPA 452/R-93-008, March 1994.

B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?

    We believe this rule is consistent with the relevant policy and
guidance regarding enforceability, RACT, and SIP relaxations. The TSD
has more information on our evaluation.
    On January 10, 2012, EPA partially approved and partially
disapproved the RACT SIP submitted by California on June 18, 2009 for
the SJV extreme ozone nonattainment area (2009 RACT SIP), based in part
on our conclusion that the State had not fully satisfied CAA section
182 RACT requirements for solid fuel fired boiler operations. See 77 FR
1417, 1425 (January 10, 2012). Final approval of Rule 4352 would
satisfy California's obligation to implement RACT under CAA section 182
for this source category for the 1-hour ozone and 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS and thereby terminate both the sanctions clocks and the Federal
Implementation Plan (FIP) clock associated with this rule.

C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rule

    The TSD describes additional rule revisions that we recommend for
the next time the local agency modifies the rule.

III. EPA's Proposed Action

    Because EPA believes the submitted rule fulfills all applicable
requirements and corrects all deficiencies identified in our October 1,
2010 action, we are proposing to fully approve it under section
110(k)(3) of the Act. We will accept comments from the public on this
proposal for the next 30 days.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve State law
as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this
proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this proposed action does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: April 13, 2012.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2012-10076 Filed 4-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: December 15, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 241)]
[Notices]
[Page 75593-75594]
[DOCID:fr15de06-116]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-54897; File No. SR-ISE-2006-76]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to ISE Stock Exchange Fees

December 8, 2006.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 5, 2006, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Exchange has designated this proposal as one establishing
or changing a due, fee, or other charge imposed by a self-regulatory
organization pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act,\3\ and rule
19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to amend its Schedule of Fees to adopt
fees related to the ISE Stock Exchange, LLC (``ISE Stock''). The text
of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site,
http://www.iseoptions.com, at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary,

and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposal. The text of these
statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C
below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to adopt fees related to
the trading of equity securities on ISE Stock, a facility of the
Exchange. The proposed fee schedule includes execution fees, access
fees and regulatory fees for trading of equity securities as well as
changes to existing language to clarify the application of certain fees
that are specific to trades being executed in the MidPoint Match
system.\5\ The fees that are applicable to MidPoint Match were filed
separately; the fees set forth in this filing apply only to the
displayed market. With regard to the execution fees, the Exchange
proposes to charge members that remove liquidity an execution fee of
$0.0030 per share executed or 0.3% of the trade value in the case of
shares priced under $1.00. For members that provide liquidity, the
Exchange proposes a rebate of $0.0025 per share executed. There will be
no rebate to liquidity providers for executions under $1.00. The
execution fees are applied on a per share basis, regardless of where
the security is listed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54561 (October 2,
2006), 71 FR 59844 (October 11, 2006) (SR-ISE-2006-54).9
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Regulation NMS under the Act, when ISE Stock does not
have contra-side interest resident in its system equal to or better
than a Protected Bid or Protected Offer,\6\ it will either cancel the
orders that are marketable against the Protected Bid or Protected Offer
if the system is incapable of routing out, or route orders that are
marketable against a Protected Bid or Protected Offer to one or more
Trading Centers.\7\ For the orders that are routed out, the Exchange
proposes to charge a fee of $0.0030 per share executed, which is the
same as the fee ISE Stock proposes to charge members for removing
liquidity. The Exchange proposes not to charge any additional fees for
routing orders to another Trading Center for execution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See ISE Rule 2100(c)(15).
    \7\ See ISE Rule 2100(c)(20).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, in line with current practice in the industry, where
market data revenue received from the Consolidated Tape Association and
UTP Plan is shared between firms that execute on an exchange and the
exchange itself, the Exchange proposes a 50 percent credit to members
that provide liquidity to the displayed

market. Finally, the Exchange proposes to charge a Session/API fee of
$250 per month to connect to the displayed market, with a waiver until
June 30, 2007 for a second and subsequent connection.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change furthers the
objectives of section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\8\ in that it is an equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its
members and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would impose no
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange did not solicit or receive any written comments with
respect to the proposal.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing proposed rule change has been designated as a fee
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(2) \10\ thereunder. Accordingly, the proposal is effective upon
filing with the Commission. At any time within 60 days of the filing of
the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such
rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
    \11\ See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-ISE-2006-76 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2006-76. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-ISE-2006-76 and should be submitted on or before January
5, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-21359 Filed 12-14-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19281-19282]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09320]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OW-2015-0665; FRL-9977-38-OW]
RIN 2040-ZA25

Final 2016 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of the Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA) Final 2016 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan
(Final 2016 Plan). Section 304(m) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires
the EPA to biennially publish a plan for new and revised effluent
limitations guidelines, after public review and comment. The Final 2016
Plan identifies any new or

existing industrial categories selected for effluent guidelines or
pretreatment standards and provides a schedule for their development.
The information and analyses from the EPA's 2015 and 2016 Annual
Reviews, in addition to input from public comments on the Preliminary
2016 Plan, were used in developing the Final 2016 Plan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phillip Flanders, Engineering and
Analysis Division, Office of Water, 4303T, U.S. EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

    A. Supporting Documents--A key document that provides additional
information for this notice is the Final 2016 Effluent Guidelines
Program Plan.
    B. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related
Information?
    1. Docket. The EPA has established official public dockets for
these actions under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2015-0665. The official
public docket is the collection of materials that are available for
public viewing at the Water Docket in the EPA Docket Center, (EPA/DC)
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
    2. Electronic access. You can access this Federal Register document
electronically through the United States government online source for
Federal regulations at http://www.regulations.gov.
    3. Internet access. Copies of the supporting documents are
available at http://www.epa.gov/eg/effluent-guidelines-plan.

II. How is this document organized?

    The outline of this notice follows.
    A. Legal Authority.
    B. Summary of the Final 2016 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan.

A. Legal Authority

    This notice is published under the authority of the CWA, 33 U.S.C.
1251, et seq., and in particular sections 301(d), 304(b), 304(g),
304(m), 306, 307(b), and 308 of the Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311(d), 1314(b),
1314(g), 1314(m), 1316, 1317(b), and 1318.

B. Summary of the Final 2016 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan

    The EPA prepared the Final 2016 Plan pursuant to CWA section
304(m). The Final 2016 Plan provides a summary of the EPA's review of
effluent guidelines and pretreatment standards, consistent with CWA
sections 301(d), 304(b), 304(g), 304(m), and 307(b). From these reviews
and considering public comment, the Final 2016 Plan identifies any new
or existing industrial categories selected for effluent guidelines or
pretreatment standards rulemakings, and provides a schedule for such
rulemakings. In addition, the Final 2016 Plan presents any new or
existing categories of industry selected for further review and
analysis.
    The Final 2016 Plan identifies one new rulemaking (and the
associated schedule) for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point
Source Category. The EPA has concluded that no additional industries
warrant new or revised effluent guidelines at this time. The Final 2016
Plan also announces that the EPA is initiating a new study to look
holistically at the management of oil and gas extraction wastewater
from onshore facilities. The focus of this study is not to look
specifically at any one existing effluent guideline. Rather, the EPA
intends to engage with stakeholders to evaluate approaches to manage
both conventional and unconventional oil and gas extraction wastewater
from onshore facilities including, but not limited to, an assessment of
technologies for facilities that treat and discharge oil and gas
extraction wastewater. Lastly, the Final 2016 Plan announces that the
EPA is initiating a new study of the Electrical and Electronic
Components Point Source Category. The focus of this study will be on
changes within the industry since the 1983 rulemaking, particularly as
these changes pertain to wastewater characteristics and wastewater
treatment technologies.
    The Final 2016 Plan and the 2015 and 2016 Annual Effluent
Guidelines Review Reports can be found at http://www.epa.gov/eg/effluent-guidelines-plan.

    Dated: April 24, 2018.
David P. Ross,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Water.
[FR Doc. 2018-09320 Filed 5-1-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Supporting documents included are from pages 376 through 457 of 457 pages concerning an ICR regarding hazardous air pollutants for American Premier, Inc. operations.


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 61 (Wednesday, March 30, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17694-17696]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07174]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0125; FRL-9943-74]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed New Collection
(EPA ICR No. 2532.01); Comment Request

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), this
document announces that EPA is planning to submit an Information
Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
The ICR, entitled: ``Use of Mercury and Mercury Compounds in Products
and Processes'' and identified by EPA ICR No. 2532.01 and OMB Control
No. 2070-NEW, represents a new request. Before submitting the ICR to
OMB for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific
aspects of the proposed information collection that is summarized in
this document. The ICR and accompanying material are available in the
docket for public review and comment.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 31, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0125, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact: Sue
Slotnick, National Program Chemicals Division (7404T), Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001;

telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. What information is EPA particularly interested in?

    Pursuant to PRA section 3506(c)(2)(A) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)),
EPA specifically solicits comments and information to enable it to:
    1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility.
    2. Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimates of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
    3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected. In particular, EPA seeks comment on these aspects of the
questionnaire:
     Are there additional products or product categories that
should be included in the questionnaire?
     Are there additional products or product categories that
should be eliminated from the questionnaire?
     Should the questionnaire ask respondents to identify which
products are intended solely as replacement parts?
    4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from
very small businesses (those that employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses affected by this collection.

II. What information collection activity or ICR does this action apply
to?

    Title: Use of Mercury and Mercury Compounds in Products and
Processes.
    ICR number: EPA ICR No. 2532.01.
    OMB control number: OMB Control No. 2070-NEW.
    ICR status: This ICR is for a new information collection activity.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), after appearing
in the Federal Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and
are displayed either by publication in the Federal Register or by other
appropriate means, such as on the related collection instrument or
form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers for certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: The U.S. EPA is making efforts to reduce the non-
essential use of mercury and mercury compounds in products and certain
manufacturing processes to prevent future releases of mercury to the
environment. After negotiating and joining a global agreement called
the Minamata Convention on Mercury, EPA continues to pursue measures to
reduce the use of mercury in various media. EPA has determined that
significant data gaps exist that prevent the Agency from taking
systematic, strategic, and effective actions to reduce the use of
mercury and mercury compounds in order to prevent potential releases to
the environment.
    To close such data gaps, EPA will collect information from persons
who process, import, and/or export mercury or mercury-added products.
In addition, EPA will request information from persons who process
mercury or mercury compounds for use in certain industrial processes.
EPA is particularly interested in the amount of mercury or mercury
compounds used in mercury-added products as a whole and among various
categories of products, including mercury or mercury compounds that are
added during domestic manufacture, as well as contained in imported and
exported products.
    Initially this will be a one-time information collection, but EPA
may request subsequent renewals of OMB approval of the information
collection as necessary. Information will be collected from companies
that manufacture, import, or export a product or products containing
mercury or mercury compounds, or companies that use mercury or mercury
compounds in a manufacturing process or processes. EPA will request
that companies voluntarily submit responses to a questionnaire during a
period of 60 days after OMB approves the proposed collection.
Thereafter, EPA will issue formal measures under section 11 of the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to obtain the information if
appropriate. EPA anticipates that the information collection activity
will involve 250 private entities, although the number of entities may
be as high as 646. The years of interest are 2010, 2013, and 2016.
    EPA will use the collected information to determine whether and if
so what type of actions, including voluntary and/or mandatory measures,
are needed to reduce non-essential use of mercury or mercury compounds.
The Agency will also use such information to prioritize where and how
EPA applies measures in order to help prevent potential risks of
mercury exposure to human health and the environment. In addition, this
information will be used to facilitate compliance with obligations of
the United States under the Minamata Convention to continue to reduce
the use of mercury in products and processes and to report on actions
taken to do so.
    Responses to the collection of information are voluntary. However,
should EPA initiate TSCA section 11 actions to compel submission of
information, those responses would be mandatory. Respondents may claim
all or part of a notice confidential. EPA will disclose information
that is covered by a claim of confidentiality only to the extent
permitted by, and in accordance with, the procedures in TSCA section 14
and 40 CFR part 2.
    Burden statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 9.9
hours per response. Burden is defined in 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    The ICR, which is available in the docket along with other related
materials, provides a detailed explanation of the collection activities
and the burden estimate that is only briefly summarized here:
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by
this ICR are persons who process mercury or mercury compounds for use
in the production of mercury-added products, import mercury for use in
the production of mercury-added products, import mercury-added
products, export mercury-added products, and/or process mercury or
mercury compounds for use in certain industrial processes.
    Estimated total number of potential respondents: 646.
    Frequency of response: One time.
    Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:
1.0.
    Estimated total annual burden hours: 6,399 hours.
    Estimated total annual costs: $444,430. This includes an estimated
burden cost of $444,430 and an

estimated cost of $0 for capital investment or maintenance and
operational costs.

III. What is the next step in the process for this ICR?

    EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. EPA will issue another
Federal Register document pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to
announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to submit
additional comments to OMB. If you have any questions about this ICR or
the approval process, please contact the technical person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Authority:  44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

    Dated: March 23, 2016.
James Jones,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2016-07174 Filed 3-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


                      Notes from Meeting with Bob Spurgin

Attended by:
Spurgin and Associates:	Bob Spurgin

EPA Staff:		Kristin Fitzgerald

Date:				January 24, 2014

EPA had a call with Bob Spurgin. He mentioned again that practice among POTWs varies, but one POTW in San Francisco is allowing aqueous pharmaceuticals to be discharged to it.


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 158 (Thursday, August 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46694-46695]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17786]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 1858-023]

Beaver City Corporation; Notice of Application Tendered for
Filing With the Commission and Soliciting Additional Study Requests and
Cooperating Agencies and Establishing Procedural Schedule for
Relicensing and a Deadline for Submission of Final Amendments

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: New Minor License.
    b. Project No.: 1858-023.
    c. Date filed: July 30, 2021.
    d. Applicant: Beaver City Corporation.
    e. Name of Project: Beaver City Canyon Plant No. 2 Hydroelectric
Project.
    f. Location: On the Beaver River, in Beaver County, Utah, about 5
miles east of the city of Beaver. The project currently occupies 10.18
acres of federal land administered by the U.S. Forest Service, and 1.87
acres of federal land managed by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management. As
proposed, the project would occupy 11.5 acres of federal land
administered by the U.S. Forest Service.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791 (a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Jason Brown, Beaver City Manager, 30 West 300
North, Beaver, UT 84713;<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Evan Williams at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Cooperating agencies: Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies
with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect to
environmental issues that wish to cooperate in the preparation of the
environmental document should follow the instructions for filing such
requests described in item l below. Cooperating agencies should note
the Commission's policy that agencies that cooperate in the preparation
of the environmental document cannot also intervene. See, 94 FERC ]
61,076 (2001).
    k. Pursuant to section 4.32(b)(7) of 18 CFR of the Commission's
regulations, if any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person believes
that an additional scientific study should be conducted in order to
form an adequate factual basis for a complete analysis of the
application on its merit, the resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person
must file a request for a study with the Commission not later than 60
days from the date of filing of the application, and serve a copy of
the request on the applicant.
    l. Deadline for filing additional study requests and requests for
cooperating agency status: September 28, 2021.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
additional study requests and requests for cooperating agency status
using the Commission's eFiling system at https://ferconline.ferc.gov/FERCOnline.aspx. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, you may submit a paper copy.
Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service must be addressed to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426. Submissions sent via
any other carrier must be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville,
Maryland 20852. All filings must clearly identify the project name and
docket number on the first page: Beaver City Canyon Plant No. 2
Hydroelectric Project (P-1858-023).
    m. The application is not ready for environmental analysis at this
time.
    n. Project Description: The existing project consists of: (1) A 17-
foot-high by 65-foot-wide diversion dam; (2) a 30-inch-diameter,
11,450-foot-long black steel penstock; (3) a 34-foot-long by 41-foot-
wide stone powerhouse containing an impulse turbine and one generating
unit with an installed capacity of 625 kilowatts; (4) a 4-foot-wide by
150-foot-long tailrace channel; (5) a 12.5-kilovolt, approximately
21,000-foot-long transmission line; and (6) appurtenant facilities.
Beaver City Corporation proposes to abandon the existing powerhouse and
tailrace and construct: (1) A new 40-foot-long by 27-foot-wide
powerhouse to contain a new turbine-generator with an installed
capacity of 720 kilowatts, and (2) a new approximately 50-foot-long by
approximately 7.5-foot-wide to 19-foot-wide tailrace. The new
powerhouse and tailrace would be constructed approximately 50 feet
upstream of the existing powerhouse, and the existing powerhouse would
be retained within the project boundary as an historic structure.
Beaver City Corporation also proposes to remove approximately 20,930
feet of the existing 12.5-kilovolt transmission line from the project.
    o. In addition to publishing the full text of this notice in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this notice, as well
as other documents in the proceeding (e.g., license application) via
the internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov)
using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last
three digits in the docket number field to access the document (P-1858-
023). At this time, the Commission has suspended access to the
Commission's Public Reference Room due to the proclamation declaring a
National Emergency concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)
issued by the President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact FERC
at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
(202) 502-8659 (TTY).
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    p. Procedural schedule and final amendments: The application will
be processed according to the following preliminary schedule. Revisions
to the schedule will be made as appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue Deficiency Letter/Request for         September 2021.
 Additional Information.
Issue Acceptance Letter...................  December 2021.
Issue Scoping Document 1..................  January 2022.
Request for Additional Information (if      March 2022.
 necessary).
Issue Scoping Document 2 (if necessary)...  April 2022.

Notice of Ready for Environmental Analysis  April 2022.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Final amendments to the application must be filed with the
Commission no later than 30 days from the issuance date of the notice
of ready for environmental analysis.

    Dated: August 13, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-17786 Filed 8-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P