			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on August 21, 2003

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST 2003-15504

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Application of    Delta Air Lines, Inc.  filed  6/24/03 for:

XX  Exemption for two years under 49 U.S.C. §40109 to provide the
following service:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail
between Newark, New Jersey, and Antigua; Newark, New Jersey, and
Houston, Texas, on the one hand, and Sao Paulo, and Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil, on the other hand; Newark, New Jersey, and Houston, Texas, on
the one hand, and Bogota, Colombia, on the other hand; between
Cleveland, Ohio, and Cancun Mexico; between Houston, Texas, on the one
hand, and Acapulco, Aguascalientes, Cancun, Chihuahua, Cozumel,
Guadalajara, Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo, Leon, Manzanillo, Mazatlan, Merida,
Monterrey, Morelia, Puerto Vallarta, Saltillo, San Jose del Cabo, San
Luis Potosi, Tampico, Torreon, Veracruz, and Villahermosa, Mexico, on
the other hand; and between New York/Newark, on the one hand, and
Acapulco, Cozumel, Puerto Vallarta, and San Jose del Cabo, Mexico, on
the other hand; and to combine the authority requested with Delta’s
other exemption and certificate authority.  Delta states that it will
use the authority pursuant to a code-share arrangement with Continental
and/or Continental Express (ExpressJet) , whereby Delta will place its
code on flights operated by Continental and/or ExpressJet.

Applicant rep:   Robert E. Cohn<PHONE_NUMBER>     DOT Analyst:  Linda
L. Lundell<PHONE_NUMBER>

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX  Granted, subject to conditions (see below).

The action above was effective when taken:   August 21, 2003, through
August 21, 2005.

Action taken by:     Paul L. Gretch, Director

		        Office of International Aviation

XX  Authority granted is consistent with the aviation agreements between
the United States and the foreign countries involved.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

XX  Holder’s certificates of public convenience and necessity

XX  Standard Exemption Conditions (attached)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------

Special Conditions/Remarks:  The U.S.-Mexico exemption authority granted
is subject to the dormancy notice requirements set forth in condition 7
of Appendix A of Order 88-10-2.   All of the exemption authority granted
is limited to service provided on a code-share basis only.

The route integration authority granted is subject to the condition that
any service provided under this exemption shall be consistent with all
applicable agreements between the United States and the foreign
countries involved.  Furthermore, (a) nothing in the award of the route
integration authority granted should be construed as conferring upon
Delta rights (including fifth-freedom intermediate and/or beyond rights)
to serve markets where U.S. carrier entry is limited unless Delta
notifies the Department of its intent to serve such a market and unless
and until the Department has completed any necessary carrier selection
procedures to determine which carrier(s) should be authorized to

- see next page -

													2

exercise such rights; and (b) should there be a request by any such
carrier to use the limited-entry route rights that are included in
Delta’s authority by virtue of the route integration authority granted
here, but that are not then being used by Delta, the holding of such
authority by route integration will not be considered as providing any
preference for Delta in a competitive carrier selection proceeding to
determine which carrier(s) should be entitled to use the authority at
issue.

The code-share operations conducted under this authorization are subject
to the following conditions:  (a) The code-sharing operations conducted
under this authority must comply with 14 CFR 257 and with any amendment
to the Department’s regulations concerning code-share arrangements
that may be adopted.  Notwithstanding any provisions in the contract
between the carriers, our approval here is expressly conditioned upon
the requirements that the subject foreign air transportation be sold in
the name of the carrier holding out such service in computer reservation
systems and elsewhere; that the carrier selling such transportation
(i.e., the carrier shown on the ticket) accept responsibility for the
entirety of the code-share journey for all obligations established in
its contract of carriage with the passenger; and that the passenger
liability of the operating carrier be unaffected; and (b)	 the authority
granted here is specifically conditioned so that neither Delta nor
Continental/ExpressJet shall give any force or effect to any contractual
provisions between themselves that are contrary to these conditions.

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department’s regulations, we found the applicant qualified to provide
the services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) grant of the application was consistent with the public
interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
 To the extent not granted, we denied all requests in the referenced
Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority granted in this
Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

http://dms.dot.gov/reports_aviation.asp

										APPENDIX

U.S. CARRIER EXEMPTION CONDITIONS

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the U.S. carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2)  Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3)  Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4)  Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security.  To assure compliance with all applicable U.S.
Government requirements concerning security, the holder shall, before
commencing any new service (including charter flights) to or from a
foreign airport, contact its Principal Security Inspector (PSI) to
advise the PSI of its plans and to find out whether the Transportation
Security Administration has determined that security is adequate to
allow such airport(s) to be served; and

(7)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations
of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the
United States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.

											8/2003


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 63 (Thursday, April 2, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17712-17713]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07371]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2015-0040; FRL-9925-48-Region 3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Virginia; State Boards Requirements; Infrastructure Requirements for
the 2008 Lead and Ozone and 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide
National Ambient Air Quality Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to approve
the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
Commonwealth of Virginia for the purpose of meeting the requirements of
Clean Air Act (CAA) section 128. This rulemaking action also proposes
to approve an infrastructure element directly related to the
regulations being added for several previously submitted infrastructure
SIPs for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS),
the 2008 Ozone NAAQS, the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide NAAQS, and the 2010
Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS. In the Final Rules section of this issue of the
Federal Register, EPA is approving the Commonwealth's SIP submittal as
a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views
this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the
direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to
this action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment
period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do
so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received in writing by May 4, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2015-0040 by one of the following methods:
    A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    B. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2015-0040, Marilyn Powers, Acting Associate
Director, Office of Air Program Planning, Air Protection Division,
Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
    D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2015-0040. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the Commonwealth's
submittal are available at the Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality, 629 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Schmitt,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For further information, please see the
information provided in the direct final action, with the same title,
that is located in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this
Federal Register publication. Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.

    Dated: March 13, 2015.
William C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2015-07371 Filed 4-1-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: February 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 26)]
[Notices]
[Page 6423-6424]
[DOCID:fr09fe10-108]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Release No. 34-61474; File No. SR-NSX-2010-01]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend the NSX Fee and Rebate Schedule To Increase the Rebate for
Liquidity Adding Displayed Orders of Securities Priced Under One Dollar
in the Auto Execution Mode of Order Interaction to 0.25% of Trade Value

February 2, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on January 29, 2010, National Stock Exchange, Inc. filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change, as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice
to solicit comment on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    National Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NSX[supreg]'' or ``Exchange'') is
proposing a rule change, operative at commencement of trading on
February 1, 2010, which proposes to amend the NSX Fee and Rebate
Schedule (the ``Fee Schedule'') to increase the rebate for liquidity
adding displayed orders of securities priced under one dollar in the
Auto Execution mode of order interaction (``AutoEx'') \3\ to 0.25% of
trade value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange's two modes of order interaction are described
in NSX Rule 11.13(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://www.nsx.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    With this rule change, the Exchange is proposing to modify the Fee
Schedule to increase the rebate for liquidity adding displayed orders
of securities priced under one dollar in AutoEx to 0.25% of trade
value.
    The current Fee Schedule provides a rebate in AutoEx of 0.10% of
trade value (except for Zero Display Orders \4\) with respect to
transactions in securities priced under one dollar. The term ``trade
value'' means a dollar amount equal to the price per share multiplied
by the number of shares executed.\5\ The instant rule filing proposes
to increase such rebate from 0.10% of trade value to 0.25% of trade
value. Zero Display Orders remain excluded from this rebate program.
The proposed rule change would not modify other rebates or fees that
are included in the Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ ``Zero Display Orders'' as used herein and in the Fee
Schedule means ``Zero Display Reserve Orders'' as specified in NSX
Rule 11.11(c)(2)(A).
    \5\ See Explanatory Endnote (6) to the Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rationale
    The Exchange has determined that this change is necessary to create
further incentive for ETP Holders to submit increased volumes of
liquidity providing displayed orders of sub-dollar securities in AutoEx
and, ultimately, to increase the revenues of the Exchange for the
purpose of continuing to adequately fund its regulatory and general
business functions. The Exchange has further determined that the
proposed fee adjustment is necessary for competitive reasons. The
Exchange believes that this rebate change will not impair its ability
to carry out its regulatory responsibilities.
    The proposed modifications are reasonable and equitably allocated
to those ETP Holders that opt to provide liquidity adding displayed
orders of securities priced under one dollar in AutoEx, and is not
discriminatory because ETP Holders are free to elect whether or not to
send liquidity adding displayed orders for sub-dollar securities in
AutoEx. In addition, the proposed modification will tend to further
incentivize ETP Holders to submit displayed orders over Zero

Display Orders in AutoEx. Based upon the information above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest.
Operative Date and Notice
    The Exchange intends to make the proposed modifications, which are
effective on filing of this proposed rule, operative for trading on
February 1, 2010. Pursuant to Exchange Rule 16.1(c), the Exchange will
``provide ETP Holders with notice of all relevant dues, fees,
assessments and charges of the Exchange'' through the issuance of a
Regulatory Circular of the changes to the Fee Schedule and will post a
copy of the rule filing on the Exchange's Web site (http://
www.nsx.com).
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that it is designed to
provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other
charges among its members and other persons using the facilities of the
Exchange. Moreover, the proposed rule change is not discriminatory in
that all ETP Holders are eligible to submit (or not submit) trades and
quotes at any price in AutoEx in all tapes, as either displayed or
undisplayed, and as liquidity adding or liquidity taking, and may do so
at their discretion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any inappropriate burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The proposed rule change has taken effect upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \8\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \9\ thereunder, because, as provided in (f)(2), it changes ``a
due, fee or other charge applicable only to a member'' (known on the
Exchange as an ETP Holder). At any time within sixty (60) days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NSX-2010-01 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NSX-2010-01. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the self-regulatory
organization. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NSX-
2010-01 and should be submitted on or before March 2, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-2740 Filed 2-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P