[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 8967]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03326]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491; FRL-9906-78-OAR]

Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request; Federal
Implementation Plans To Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate
Matter and Ozone (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency published in the Federal
Register of February 6, 2013, a notice for comment request for the
renewal of the Information Collection Request for the Federal
Implementation Plans to Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate
Matter and Ozone. The notice referenced the incorrect Docket ID Number.
This notice provides the correct Docket ID Number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen VanSickle at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Correction: In the Federal Register of February 6, 2013, (79 FR
7179) in [FRL 9906-29-OAR], in the heading, correct the Docket ID
Number to read: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491.

    Dated: February 10, 2014.
Karen Orehowsky,
Acting Director, Clean Air Markets Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-03326 Filed 2-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 166 (Friday, August 26, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58846-58849]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20530]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2015-1030]
RIN 1625-AA87

Security Zone; Kailua Bay, Oahu, HI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone for
the protection of a very important person (VIP). This VIP will be
staying on beachfront property in close proximity to Kailua Bay. It is
necessary to restrict waterway access to vessels and persons to prevent
waterside threats

to the VIP. The security zone encompasses two primary areas from the
surface of the water to the ocean floor from the navigable waters of
the Kawainui Canal, beginning 150 yards south of the N. Kalaheo Avenue
Road Bridge and continuing into Kailua Bay; and the navigable waters of
Kailua Bay beginning at Kapoho Point and extending in a southwesterly
direction to the shore boundary of a property located at 123 Kailuana
Loop, Kailua, HI 96734. Entry of persons or vessels into the security
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP)
Honolulu or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 4:00 p.m. (HST) on August 30, 2016,
through 11:30 p.m. (HST) on September 2, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2015-1030. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2015-1030 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Commander Nicolas Jarboe, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Honolulu; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
TFR Temporary final rule
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code
VIP Very Important Person

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) [5 U.S.C. 553(b)]. This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency, for good cause, finds those
procedures are ``impractical, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM and for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
The Coast Guard further finds that it would be impractical to issue an
NPRM with respect to this rule because details of the VIP's travel to
Hawaii were not provided to the Coast Guard until August 9, 2016,
preventing the Coast Guard from completing full notice-and-comment
rulemaking procedures. Publishing an NPRM and delaying the effective
date would be contrary to the security zone's intended objectives,
including but not limited to protection of the VIP, mitigation of
potential terrorist risks, and enhancing public and maritime security.
Publishing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and delaying the
effective date would be contrary to the public interest since the
occasion would occur before a notice-and-comment rulemaking could be
completed, thereby jeopardizing the safety of the VIP. The COTP finds
this temporary security zone must be effective by August 30, 2016 to
ensure the safety of the VIP during his visit to the Kailua Bay area on
the eastern coast of Oahu, Hawaii.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under the authority in 33
U.S.C. 1231. From August 30, 2016 through September 2, 2016, a VIP of
the United States of America plans to visit the Kailua Bay area on
Oahu, Hawaii. The security zone encompasses two primary areas from the
surface of the water to the ocean floor: (1) The navigable waters of
the Kawainui Canal, beginning 150 yards south of the N. Kalaheo Avenue
Road Bridge and continuing into Kailua Bay; and (2) the navigable
waters of Kailua Bay beginning at Kapoho Point and extending in a
southwesterly direction to the shore boundary of a property located at
123 Kailuana Loop, Kailua, HI 96734. The Captain of the Port of
Honolulu (COTP) has determined the potential risks associated with the
VIP's visit to the Kailua Bay area render a security zone necessary to
ensure the VIP's safety. Entry of persons or vessels into the security
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP)
Honolulu or a designated representative.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    This temporary final rule establishes a security zone from 4:00
p.m. (HST) on August 30, 2016, through 11:30 p.m. (HST) on September 2,
2016. The security zone encompasses two primary areas from the surface
of the water to the ocean floor: (1) The navigable waters of the
Kawainui Canal, beginning 150 yards south of the N. Kalaheo Avenue Road
Bridge and continuing into Kailua Bay; and (2) the navigable waters of
Kailua Bay beginning at Kapoho Point and extending in a southwesterly
direction to the shore boundary of a property located at 123 Kailuana
Loop, Kailua, HI 96734.
    Two (2) shore-side markers will be placed in proximity of the
security zone along the security zone boundary and one (1) orange boom
will be placed at the canal boundary south of the N. Kalaheo Avenue
Road Bridge as visual aids for mariners and public to approximate the
zone. An illustration of the security zone will be made available on
www.regulations.gov in the docket for this rulemaking, USCG-2015-1030.
No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the security zone
without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. The Coast Guard expects the
economical impact of this rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory
Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is
unnecessary. This expectation is based on the limited duration of the
zone, the limited geographic area affected by it, and the lack of
commercial vessel traffic affected by the zone. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions

with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T14-1030 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T14-1030  Security Zone; Kailua Bay, Oahu, HI.

    (a) Location. The security zone area is located within the Captain
of the Port (COTP) Zone (See 33 CFR 3.70-10) and encompasses two
primary areas from the surface of the water to the ocean floor:
    (1) The navigable waters of the Kawainui Canal, beginning 150 yards
south of the N. Kalaheo Avenue Road Bridge and continuing into Kailua
Bay; and
    (2) The navigable waters of Kailua Bay beginning at Kapoho Point
and extending in a southwesterly direction to the shore boundary of a
property located at 123 Kailuana Loop, Kailua, HI 96734. The geographic
coordinates of the zone include the navigable waters of the Kawainui
Canal beginning at a point 21[deg]24'56'' N., 157[deg]44'58'' W., then
extending to 21[deg]25'27'' N., 157[deg]44'21'' W. (Kapoho Point)
including all the waters to the west of a straight line to
21[deg]25'11'' N., 157[deg]44'39'' W., and extending back to the
original point 21[deg]24'56'' N., 157[deg]44'58'' W.
    (b) Effective period. This rule is effective from 4:00 p.m. (HST)
on August 30, 2016, through 11:30 p.m. (HST) on September 2, 2016.
    (c) Regulations. The general regulations governing security zones
contained in Sec.  165.33 apply to the security zone created by this
temporary final rule.
    (1) All persons and vessels are required to comply with the general
regulations governing security zones found in this part.
    (2) Entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP or his designated representative.
    (3) Persons or vessels desiring to transit the security zone
identified in paragraph (a) of this section may contact the COTP
through his designated representatives at the Command Center via
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER> and<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; or
on VHF channel 16 (156.8 Mhz) to request permission to transit the
zones. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply
with the

instructions of the COTP or his designated representative and proceed
at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course while in the
zone.
    (4) The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the security zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
    (d) Notice of enforcement. The COTP will cause notice of the
enforcement of the security zone described in this section to be made
by verbal broadcasts and written notice to mariners and the general
public.
    (e) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has
been authorized by the COTP to assist in enforcing the security zone
described in paragraph (a) of this section.

    Dated: August 16, 2016.
M.C. Long,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2016-20530 Filed 8-25-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 11, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 75287-75289]
[FR Doc No: 2013-29487]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2013-1040; Notice No. 25-13-39-SC]

Special Conditions: Bombardier Inc., Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-
500-1A11 Series Airplanes; Flight Envelope Protection: General Limiting
Requirements

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for the Bombardier
Inc. Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 series airplanes. These
airplanes will have a novel or unusual design feature associated with a
new control architecture and a full digital flight control system that
provides flight envelope protections. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for
this design feature. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not
contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design
feature. These proposed special conditions contain the additional
safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.

DATES: Send your comments on or before January 27, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2013-1040
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to http://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Jacobsen, FAA, Airplane and Flight
Crew Interface Branch, ANM-111, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington, 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
    We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing
date for comments. We may change these special conditions based on the
comments we receive.

Background

    On December 10, 2009, Bombardier Inc. applied for a type
certificate for their new Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 series
airplanes (hereafter collectively referred to as ``C-series''). The C-
series airplanes are swept-wing monoplanes with a pressurized cabin.
They share an identical supplier base and significant common design
elements. The fuselage is aluminum alloy material, blended double-
bubble fuselage, sized for nominal 5-abreast seating. Each airplane's
powerplant consists of two under wing Pratt and Whitney PW1524G ultra-
high bypass, geared turbofan engines. Flight controls are fly-by-wire
flight with two passive/uncoupled side sticks. Avionics includes five
landscape primary cockpit displays. The dimension of the airplanes
encompass a wingspan of 115 feet; a height of 37.75 feet; and a length
of 114.75 feet for the Model BD-500-1A10 and a length of 127 feet for
the Model BD-500-1A11. Passenger capacity is designated as 110 for the
Model BD-500-1A10 and 125 for the Model BD-500-1A11. Maximum takeoff
weight is 131,000 pounds for the Model BD-500-1A10 and 144,000 pounds
for the Model BD-500-1A11. Maximum takeoff thrust is 21,000 pounds for
the Model BD-500-1A10 and 23,300 pounds for the Model BD-500-1A11.
Range is 3,394 miles (5,463 kilometers) for both models of airplanes.
Maximum operating altitude is 41,000 feet for both model airplanes.
    Bombardier has developed comprehensive flight envelope protection
features integral to the C-series electronic flight control system
(EFCS) design. These flight envelope protection features include
limitations on angle-of-attack, normal load factor, bank angle, pitch
angle, and speed. To accomplish this flight envelope limiting, a
significant change (or multiple changes) occurs in the EFCS control
laws as the limit is approached or exceeded. When EFCS failure states
occur, flight envelope protection features can likewise either be
modified, or in some cases, eliminated. The current regulations were
not written with these comprehensive flight envelope limiting systems
in mind.

Type Certification Basis

    Under the provisions of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR) 21.17, Bombardier Inc. must show that the C-series airplanes meet
the applicable provisions of part 25 as amended by Amendments 25-1
through 25-129 thereto.
    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the C-series airplanes because of a
novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under the provisions of Sec.  21.16.
    Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar
novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also
apply to the other model under Sec.  21.101.
    In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the C-series airplanes must comply with the fuel vent and
exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36, and the FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under Sec.  611 of Public Law 92-574,
the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
    The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec.  11.38, and they become part of the type-
certification basis under Sec.  21.17(a)(2).

Novel or Unusual Design Features

    The C-series airplanes will incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features: new control architecture and a full digital
flight control system that provides comprehensive flight envelope
protections.

Discussion

    The applicable airworthiness regulation in this instance is 14 CFR
25.143. The purpose of Sec.  25.143 is to verify that any operational
maneuvers conducted within the operational envelope can be accomplished
smoothly with average piloting skill and without exceeding any
structural limits. The pilot should be able to predict the airplane
response to any control input. During the course of the flight test
program, the pilot determines compliance with Sec.  25.143 through
primarily qualitative methods. During flight test, the pilot should
evaluate all of the following:
     The interface between each protection function;
     Transitions from one mode to another;
     The aircraft response to intentional dynamic maneuvering,
whenever applicable, through dedicated maneuvers;
     General controllability assessment;
     High speed characteristics; and
     High angle-of-attack.
    Section 25.143, however, does not adequately ensure that the novel
or unusual features of the C-series airplanes will have a level of
safety equivalent to that of existing standards. These special
conditions are therefore required to accommodate the flight envelope
limiting systems in the C-series airplanes. The additional safety
standards in these special conditions will ensure a level of safety
equivalent to that of existing standards.

Applicability

    As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 series airplanes. Should Bombardier
Inc. apply at a later date for a change to the type certificate to
include another model incorporating the same novel or unusual design
feature, the special conditions would apply to that model as well.

Conclusion

    This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on two model series of airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.

The Proposed Special Conditions

    Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of the type certification basis
for the Bombardier Inc. Models BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 series
airplanes.
    1. General Limiting Requirements:
    a. Onset characteristics of each envelope protection feature must
be smooth, appropriate to the phase of flight and type of maneuver, and
not in conflict with the ability of the pilot to satisfactorily change
airplane flight path, speed, or attitude as needed.

    b. Limit values of protected flight parameters (and if applicable,
associated warning thresholds) must be compatible with the following:
    i. Airplane structural limits,
    ii. Required safe and controllable maneuvering of the airplane, and
    iii. Margins to critical conditions. Unsafe flight characteristics/
conditions must not result if dynamic maneuvering, airframe and system
tolerances (both manufacturing and in-service), and non-steady
atmospheric conditions, in any appropriate combination and phase of
flight, can produce a limited flight parameter beyond the nominal
design limit value.
    c. The airplane must be responsive to intentional dynamic
maneuvering to within a suitable range of the parameter limit. Dynamic
characteristics such as damping and overshoot must also be appropriate
for the flight maneuver and limit parameter in question.
    d. When simultaneous envelope limiting is engaged, adverse coupling
or adverse priority must not result.
    2. Failure States: Electronic flight control system failures
(including sensor) must not result in a condition where a parameter is
limited to such a reduced value that safe and controllable maneuvering
is no longer available. The crew must be alerted by suitable means if
any change in envelope limiting or maneuverability is produced by
single or multiple failures of the electronic flight control system not
shown to be extremely improbable.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 29, 2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-29487 Filed 12-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: January 25, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 16)]
[Notices]
[Page 4126-4127]
[DOCID:fr25ja06-63]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER06-230-000]

Wolverine Creek Energy LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

January 18, 2006.
    Wolverine Creek Energy LLC filed an application for market-based
rate authority, with an accompanying rate tariff. The proposed market-
based rate schedule provides for the sales of capacity, energy and
ancillary at market-based rates. Wolverine also requested waiver of
various Commission regulations. In particular, Wolverine requested that
the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by
Wolverine.
    On January 13, 2006, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director,
Division of Tariffs and Market Development--West, granted the request
for blanket approval under Part 34. The Director's order also stated
that the Commission would publish a separate notice in the Federal
Register establishing a period of time for the filing of protests.
Accordingly, any person desiring to be heard or to protest the blanket
approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liability by
Wolverine should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214

of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. 18 CFR 385.211,
385.214 (2004).
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to
intervene or protest is February 13, 2006.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition by the deadline above,
Wolverine is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or
liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect
of any security of another person; provided that such issuance or
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of
Wolverine, compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably
necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by
continued approval of Wolverine's issuances of securities or
assumptions of liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the

docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may
be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-837 Filed 1-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 3, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20073-20074]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07769]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 239 and 258

[EPA-R10-RCRA-2013-0105; FRL-9796-7]

Adequacy of Oregon's Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Permit
Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA Region 10 proposes to approve a modification to the State
of Oregon's approved Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Program. On March
22, 2004, EPA issued final regulations allowing research, development,
and demonstration (RD&D) permits to be issued to certain municipal
solid waste landfills by approved states. On June 14, 2012, Oregon
submitted an application to EPA Region 10 seeking Federal approval of
its RD&D requirements.

DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing on
or before May 3, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R10-
RCRA-2013-0105, by one of the following methods:
     www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>, to the attention of Domenic Calabro.
     Mail: Send written comments to Domenic Calabro, Office of
Air, Waste, and Toxics, U.S. EPA, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite
900, Mailstop: AWT-122, Seattle, WA 98101.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to:
Domenic Calabro, Office of Air, Waste, and Toxics, U.S. EPA, Region 10,
1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Mailstop: AWT-122, Seattle, WA 98101.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Office's normal hours of
operation.
    For detailed instructions on how to submit comments, please see the
direct final rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Domenic Calabro at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Rules section of this Federal
Register, the EPA is approving modifications to Oregon's Municipal
Solid Waste Landfill permit program to allow for Research, Development,
and Demonstration permits through a direct final rule without prior
proposal, because the EPA views this as a noncontroversial action and
anticipates no adverse comments to this action. Unless we receive
written adverse comments which oppose this approval during the comment
period, the direct final rule will become effective on the date it
establishes, and we will not take further action on this proposal. If
the EPA receives written adverse comments, the direct final rule will
be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a
subsequent final rule.

The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any
parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this
time. For additional information, see the direct final rule which is
located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.

    Authority:  This action is issued under the authority of
sections 2002, 4005 and 4010(c) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912, 6945 and 6949(a).

    Dated: March 8, 2013.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2013-07769 Filed 4-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35011-35012]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12767]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER16-1738-000]

Beacon Solar 4, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Beacon Solar 4, LLC`s application for market-based rate authority, with
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is June 13, 2016.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 23, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-12767 Filed 5-31-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P