[Federal Register: June 2, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 106)]
[Notices]
[Page 32171-32173]
[DOCID:fr02jn06-137]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-53874; File No. SR-Phlx-2006-18]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed
Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to Split Price
Priority in Options

May 25, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on March 2, 2006, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx''
or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. On May 9,
2006, Phlx filed an amendment to the proposed rule change (``Amendment
No. 1'').\3\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons and is
approving the proposal on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange revised the rule text of
the proposed rule change to clarify its meaning and revised the
purpose section to clarify the operation of the Exchange's current
split price priority rule and the proposed modification to that
rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Phlx Rule 1014(g)(i)(C) \4\ to adopt
a new split price priority provision that establishes priority for in-
crowd participants in split price transactions over the quotations of
participants that are not located in the crowd (i.e., out-of-crowd
Streaming Quote Traders (``SQTs'') \5\ and Remote Streaming Quote
Traders (``RSQTs'') \6\) even where the market has a bid/ask
differential of one minimum trading increment.\7\ The text of the
proposed rule change, as amended, is set forth below. Proposed new
language is in italics; deleted language is in brackets.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Phlx Rule 1014(g)(i)(C) is subject to a pilot program
scheduled to expire on June 30, 2006. See infra Section II. A.1.
    \5\ An SQT is an ROT who has received permission from the
Exchange to generate and submit option quotations electronically
through AUTOM in eligible options to which such SQT is assigned. An
SQT may only submit such quotations while such SQT is physically
present on the floor of the Exchange. See Phlx Rule 1014(b)(ii)(A).
    \6\ An RSQT is an ROT that is a member or member organization
with no physical trading floor presence who has received permission
from the Exchange to generate and submit option quotations
electronically through AUTOM in eligible options to which such RSQT
has been assigned. An RSQT may only submit such quotations
electronically from off the floor of the Exchange. See Phlx Rule
1014(b)(ii)(B).
    \7\ Generally, all options on stocks, indexes, and Exchange
Traded Funds quoting in decimals at $3.00 or higher have a minimum
increment of $.10, and those quoting in decimals under $3.00 have a
minimum increment of $.05. See Phlx Rule 1034(a).
    \8\ The bracketed word ``and'' in the final sentence of the rule
text set forth below is indicated in Exhibit 4 of the proposed rule
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
Obligations and Restrictions Applicable to Specialists and Registered
Options Traders
Rule 1014. (a)-(f) No change.
(g) Equity Option and Index Option Priority and Parity
    (i) (A)-(B)
    (C) Purchase or sale priority for orders of 100 contracts or more.
If a member purchases (sells) 50 or more option contracts of a
particular series at a particular price or prices, he shall, at the
next lower (higher) price have priority in purchasing (selling) up to
the equivalent number of option contracts of the same series that he
purchased (sold) at the higher (lower) price or prices, but only if his
bid (offer) is made promptly and the purchase (sale) so effected
represents the opposite side of a transaction with the same order or
offer (bid) as the earlier purchase or purchases (sale or sales).
    When the market has a bid/ask differential of one minimum trading
increment and the bid and/or offer represent the quotation of an out-
of-crowd SQT or an RSQT, such member shall have priority over such SQT
and/or RSQT with respect to both the bid and the offer.
    The Options Committee may increase the ``minimum qualifying order
size'' above 100 contracts for all products under its jurisdiction.
Announcements regarding changes to the minimum qualifying order size
shall be made via an Exchange circular. This paragraph is subject to a
pilot scheduled to expire June 30, 2006, and shall only apply to
transactions in equity options (including [and] options overlying
Exchange Traded Fund Shares (``ETFs'')) and only to such transactions
that are effected in open outcry.
    (h) No change.
    Commentary: No change.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change, as
amended, and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule
change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places
specified in Item III below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of
such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to modify an existing
pilot program concerning split-price transactions (``pilot''),\9\ which
by virtue of their size and the need to execute them at multiple prices
may be difficult to execute without a limited exception to current
Exchange priority rules, as described below. The pilot is scheduled to
expire on June 30, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53021 (December 23,
2005), 70 FR 77435 (December 30, 2005) (SR-Phlx-2005-86).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to modify the pilot such that when the market
has a bid/ask differential of one minimum trading increment and the bid
and/or offer represent the quotation of an out-of-crowd SQT or an RSQT,
the rule would apply to grant priority over such

SQT and/or RSQT with respect to the bid and/or the offer. Thus, the
Exchange is expanding the pilot to include priority in both trades of
the split price transaction where there is a minimum trading increment
market, but only over an out-of-crowd SQT or an RSQT. Such priority
would apply only when the bid and/or ask, as applicable, represent the
quotation of an out-of-crowd SQT or an RSQT.

Current Pilot

    The current pilot, applicable to equity options (including options
overlying Exchange Traded Fund Shares, permits a member with an order
for at least 100 contracts \10\ who buys (sells) at least 50 contracts
at a particular price to have priority over all others in purchasing
(selling) up to an equivalent number of contracts of the same order at
the next lower (higher) price without being required to yield priority,
including to existing customer interest in the limit order book. Absent
this rule, such orders would be required to yield priority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Orders for a size of less than 100 contracts are not
eligible for the current pilot and would not be affected by this
proposed rule change.
    \11\ See Phlx Rule 119(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For example, where the market is $.25-$.35, a Floor Broker who is
representing an order to purchase 100 contracts and executes a purchase
of 50 of those contracts at a price of $.30 has priority over all
market participants to purchase the remaining 50 contracts in the order
at $.25. Two trades would be reported to the tape, one a purchase of 50
contracts at $.30 and the other a purchase of 50 contracts at $.25. The
Floor Broker's customer thus would receive a net purchase price of
$.275 for 100 contracts.
    In this example, the Floor Broker would not be able to use this
provision in a minimum increment market (e.g., $.25-$.30), because he
or she could not execute the first trade at $.30 at all, regardless of
the current split price priority provision, because that provision does
not give priority over whoever is offering at $.30 until the second
trade. Accordingly, the Exchange is proposing to amend the split price
priority provision, as described below.

Proposed Modification to the Current Pilot

    As stated above, the current pilot contemplates that a member who
purchases (sells) 50 or more option contracts of a particular series at
a particular price or prices has priority at the next lower (higher)
price in purchasing (selling) up to the equivalent number of option
contracts of the same series that he or she purchased (sold) at the
higher (lower) price or prices. The proposed rule change would afford
priority to members physically located in the crowd with respect to
split price transactions in those instances when the market has a bid/
ask differential of one minimum trading increment and the bid and/or
ask represent quotations of members physically located outside of the
crowd. The Exchange believes that this provision should enable it to
compete for order flow in situations where Floor Brokers seek split
price executions in open outcry when the bid and/or ask consists of
RSQT quotations and/or the quotations of an out-of-crowd SQT and there
is a bid/ask differential of one minimum trading increment.
    The Exchange provides the following example: assume a Floor Broker
represents an order to purchase 100 contracts in a series where the
market is $0.25 bid, $0.30 offer, and both the bid and offer represent
quotations submitted by out of-crowd SQTs \12\ or RSQTs. Under the
proposal, the Floor Broker and contra-side participant in the trading
crowd would be afforded priority over the out-of-crowd SQT or RSQT at
both $0.25 and $0.30, because the bid/ask differential is one minimum
trading increment ($.05). This would enable the Floor Broker to execute
a split-price order at a net price ($0.275) that improves the market.
According to the Phlx, the effect (and ultimate benefit) to that Floor
Broker's customer would be a net purchase price of $.275 for 100
contracts. The proposed rule change would apply only with respect to
quotations submitted by out-of-crowd SQTs and RSQTs, and thus would not
operate to afford priority over, for example, customer or broker-dealer
orders or in-crowd SQT quotes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The specialist and/or SQTs participating in a trading crowd
may, in response to a verbal request for a market by a Floor Broker,
state a bid or offer that is different than their electronically
submitted bid or offer, provided that such stated bid or offer is
not inferior to such electronically submitted bid or offer. See Phlx
Rule 1014, Commentary .05(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that, in situations where the market has a
bid/ask differential of one minimum trading increment, it is
potentially difficult for the Floor Broker to achieve price improvement
for the Floor Broker's customer on the Phlx. Instead, the order might
trade at another exchange that has no impediments, i.e., rules that
afford priority to in-crowd participants over out-of-crowd participants
generally, regardless of split price priority.\13\ Accordingly, the
Exchange has proposed a limited exception to its priority rule in the
context of split price transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ The Phlx cites to Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (``CBOE'') Rule 6.45A, which provides that only in-
crowd market participants are eligible to participate in open outcry
trade allocations. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51366
(March 14, 2005), 70 FR 13217 (March 18, 2005) (SR-CBOE-2004-75).
The Phlx notes that CBOE Rule 6.45A affords priority over out-of-
crowd participants even where there is no split price priority
situation. CBOE Rule 6.47 contains CBOE's split price provision,
which is similar to current Phlx Rule 1014(g)(i)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \14\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \15\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest. According to the Exchange, the rule would enable Floor
Brokers representing split price orders in open outcry to provide
split-price executions at improved prices on behalf of customers by
establishing a limited priority rule regarding split-price transactions
when the bid/ask differential is one minimum trading increment and the
bid and/or ask represent the quotation of an out-of-crowd participant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
); or

     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2006-18 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2006-18. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Phlx. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-Phlx-2006-18 and should be submitted on or before June
23, 2006.

IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Approval of the Proposed
Rule Change

    After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent with the requirements of the Act
and the rules and regulations thereunder, applicable to a national
securities exchange, and, in particular with the requirements of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.\16\ The proposed rule change would provide
a limited exception to the Exchange's split price priority rule by
allowing a Floor Broker and a contra-side participant in the trading
crowd to have priority over an out-of-crowd SQT or an RSQT when there
is a bid/ask differential of one minimum trading increment that is
established by the quotes of such SQT or RSQT. The Commission believes
that the proposed rule change should help facilitate better priced
executions for larger-sized orders on the floor of the Exchange. The
Commission notes that it has previously approved rule proposals that
permit an exchange to grant priority to in-crowd participants in open
outcry auctions on its floor over market participants who are not
physically present in the crowd.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ In approving this proposed rule change, as amended, the
Commission notes that it has considered the proposed rule's impact
on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
    \17\ See supra note 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has requested accelerated approval of the proposed
rule change. The Commission finds good cause, consistent with Section
19(b)(2) of the Act, to approve the proposed rule change, as amended,
prior to the 30th day after the date of publication of the notice of
filing thereof in the Federal Register. As noted above, the Exchange's
proposal yields a result similar to that of CBOE rules previously
approved by the Commission that permit a Floor Broker and a contra-side
participant in the trading crowd to have priority in split price
transactions over out-of-crowd participants when there is a bid/ask
differential of one trading increment.\18\ Accordingly, the Commission
believes that it is appropriate to approve the proposed rule change on
an accelerated basis to allow the Phlx to compete more effectively for
larger-sized orders in open outcry transactions on the floor of the
Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\19\ that the proposed rule change, as amended (Phlx-2006-18), is
hereby approved on an accelerated basis until the expiration of the
current split price priority pilot program on June 30, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-8550 Filed 6-1-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


RULE 804.	OFFSETS
      (Adopted 4/17/1997, revised 8/25/2016)

A.	Applicability

      This rule shall apply to any applicant required to obtain offsets under Rule 802, New Source Review, and to any applicant who creates emission reduction credits under Rule 806, Emission Reduction Credits.

B.	Exemptions

      None.

C.	Definitions

	See Rule 102, Definitions, and Rule 801, New Source Review  -  Definitions and General Requirements, for definitions.

D.	Requirements  -  General

      1.	Emission reductions shall be actual average annual reductions of emissions from existing sources that are enforceable, are sufficient to offset the annual potential to emit of the project and which will result in a net air quality benefit using the offset ratios listed in Sections D.8, D.9 and D.10 below.

      2.	No emission reduction shall be eligible as an emission offset unless the Control Officer finds that the emission reduction is real, surplus, permanent, quantifiable, and enforceable and has complied with Rule 806, Emission Reduction Credits. Emission reductions resulting from any permits, agreements or orders, or from requirements of federal, State, or District laws, rules and regulations or required by the District-approved federal or State attainment or maintenance plan shall not be available for offsets.

	3.	In no case shall halogenated hydrocarbons be used as offsets for reactive organic compounds.
            Also, in no case shall exempt compounds or the other compounds excluded from the definition of reactive organic compounds be used as offsets for reactive organic compounds.

	4.	In no case shall the following be allowed as offsets:

            a.	Emission reductions achieved through a shift-in-load; or

            b.	Emission reductions from gas stations, dry cleaners, body shops, and other businesses characterized by inelastic demand.

      5.	Inter-pollutant offsets may be allowed between precursor contaminants. Such offsets shall be approved by the District (using Environmental Protection Agency guidelines) on a case-by-case basis, provided that the applicant demonstrates, on the basis of the Environmental Protection Agency-approved methods (where possible), that the emission increases from the new or modified source will not cause or contribute to a violation of an ambient air quality standard. In such cases, the Control Officer shall, based on air quality analyses, impose offset ratios equal to or greater than those specified by this rule.

            a. 	Inter-pollutant offsets between PM10 and PM10 precursors may only be allowed if PM10 precursors contribute significantly to PM10 levels that exceed the PM10 ambient standards.

      6.	In order to verify that emission sources used as offsets will be maintained throughout the operation of the new or modified source:

            a.	Permitted sources which provide emission reductions as offsets will have their Authority to Construct and Permit to Operate revised or canceled.

            b.	Statutorily exempt sources used as emissions offsets will require a written contract between the applicant and the non-permitted source which shall be agreeable to and enforceable by the Control Officer and names the District as third party beneficiary. Notwithstanding any exemption from permit authorized by these Rules and Regulations, any source exempt from permit that provides emission reductions as Emission Reduction Credits shall, as a condition of being allowed to obtain an Emission Reduction Credit, obtain an Authority to Construct and Permit to Operate as required by this rule. A violation of the emission limitation provisions of any such contract shall be chargeable to the applicant.

            c.	The operation of any source which provides offsets shall be subject to enforceable permit conditions, containing specific emission limitations, to ensure that the emission reductions will be provided in accordance with the provisions of this Rule and shall continue for the reasonably expected life of the proposed new or modified source using the offsets.

      7.	Except as otherwise provided in Rule 802, Section I.3.a.3, all emission reductions used as offsets shall occur at the same time as, or before, the emission increases from the project.

      8.	Emission reductions occurring at the same stationary source as an emission increase shall be provided at an offset ratio of 1.1 to 1.

      9.	Emission reductions that do not occur at the same stationary source as an emission increase shall be provided at an offset ratio of 1.3 to 1, except as provided in Section D.10.

      10.	Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 40709.6, emission reductions located in Ventura County and San Luis Obispo County may be considered for use at stationary sources in the District. A minimum offset ratio of 1.5 to 1 shall apply to these reductions. A higher offset ratio may be established on a case-by-case determination by the District.

E.	Requirements  -  Baseline Calculations for Affected Pollutants

      The emissions from an existing source to be used as an offset shall be based upon the actual operating conditions of the existing source averaged over the three consecutive years immediately preceding the date of application, or such shorter period as may be applicable in cases where the existing source has not been in operation for three consecutive years. The Control Officer may approve any other time period of at least three years within five years prior to the date of application that is more representative of normal source operation. If a violation of laws, rules, regulations, permit conditions or orders of the District, the Air Resources Board or the Environmental Protection Agency occurred during the period used to determine the operating conditions, an adjustment shall be made to determine the emissions the existing source would have caused without such violation.


[Federal Register: January 22, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 13)]
[Notices]
[Page 2680]
[DOCID:fr22ja07-58]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]

Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public Notice

January 12, 2007.
    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of
the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission
decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt off-
the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested
proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of
the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any
oral communication.
    Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional
file associated with, but not a part of, the decisional record of the
proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited
communication and any responses thereto should become a part of the
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication, and may
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant
such a request only when it determines that fairness so requires. Any
person identified below as having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable proceeding in accordance with
Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
    Exempt off-the-record communications are included in the decisional
record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
    The following is a list of off-the-record communications recently
received by the Secretary of the Commission. The communications listed
are grouped by docket numbers in ascending order. These filings are
available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or
may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using

the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number, excluding the last three
digits, in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC, Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,

contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Docket No.                    Date received                Presenter or requester
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prohibited:
    1. CP06-54-000...........................          1-8-07  Catherine Herman.
    2. CP06-54-000...........................         1-11-07  Nancy Kelley
                                                               Lise Hanners, PhD.
    3. Project No. 11858.....................         1-11-07  Anne S. Fege, PhD.
Exempt:
    1. CP06-54-000...........................          1-4-07  Hon. Leonard A. Fasano.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-790 Filed 1-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43807-43809]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18031]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-75482; File No. SR-ISE-2015-23]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change to Extend the Price Improvement Mechanism Pilot Program

July 17, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on July 16, 2015, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the
``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The ISE proposes to extend two pilot programs related to its Price
Improvement Mechanism (``PIM''). The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange's Web site www.ise.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange currently has two pilot programs related to its PIM
(collectively, the ``PIM Pilot Programs'' or ``Pilot Programs'').\3\
The current Pilot Period provided in paragraphs .03 and .05 of the
Supplementary Material to Rule 723 is set to expire on July 17,
2015.\4\ Paragraph .03 provides that there is no minimum size
requirement for orders to be eligible for the Price Improvement
Mechanism. Paragraph .05 concerns the termination of the exposure
period by unrelated orders. In accordance with the Approval Order, the
Exchange has continually submitted certain data in support of extending
the current Pilot Programs. The Exchange proposes to extend these Pilot
Programs in their present form, through July 18, 2016, to give the
Exchange and the Commission additional time to evaluate the effects of
these Pilot Programs before the Exchange requests permanent approval of
the rules. To aid the Commission in its evaluation of the PIM
Functionality, ISE represents that it will provide

certain additional data requested by the Commission regarding trading
in the PIM for the six (6) month period from January 1, 2015 through
June 30, 2015. The Exchange agrees to provide this data by January 18,
2016 and to make the summary of the data provided to the Commission
publicly available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 50819 (December 8,
2004), 69 FR 75093 (December 15, 2004) (SR-ISE-2003-06) (Approving
the PIM pilot (the ``Approval Order'')); 52027 (July 13, 2005), 70
FR 41804 (July 20, 2005) (SR-ISE-2005-30); 54146 (July 14, 2006), 71
FR 41490 (July 21, 2006) (SR-ISE-2006-39); 56106 (July 19, 2007), 72
FR 40914 (July 25, 2007) (SR-ISE-2007-62); 56156 (July 27, 2007), 72
FR 43305 (August 3, 2007) (SR-ISE-2007-66); 58197 (July 18, 2008),
73 FR 43810 (July 28, 2008) (SR-ISE-2008-60); 60333 (July 17, 2009),
74 FR 36792 (July 24, 2009) (SR-ISE-2009-52); 62513 (July 16, 2010),
75 FR 43221 (July 23, 2010) (SR-ISE-2010-75); 64931 (July 20, 2011),
76 FR 44642 (July 26, 2011) (SR-ISE-2011-41); 67202 (June 14, 2012),
77 FR 36589 (June 19, 2012) (SR-ISE-2012-54); 69853 (June 25, 2013),
78 FR 39390 (July 1, 2013) (SR-ISE-2013-41); and 72467 (June 25,
2014), 79 FR 37377 (July 1, 2014) (SR-ISE-2014-33).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-72467 (June 25,
2014), 79 FR 37377 (July 1, 2014) (SR-ISE-2014-33).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The basis under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Exchange
Act'') for this proposed rule change is found in Section 6(b)(5), in
that the proposed rule change is designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms
of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general,
to protect investors and the public interest.
    The Exchange believes the Pilot Programs are consistent with the
Exchange Act because they provide opportunity for price improvement for
all orders executed in the Exchange's Price Improvement Mechanism. The
proposed extension would allow the Pilot Programs to continue
uninterrupted, thereby avoiding any potential investor confusion that
could result from a temporary interruption to the pilot. Further, the
Exchange believes that the data demonstrates that there is sufficient
investor interest and demand to extend the Pilot Programs for an
additional twelve months. The Exchange further believes it is
appropriate to extend the Pilot Programs to provide the Exchange and
Commission more data upon which to evaluate the rules. With this data,
the Commission can evaluate whether the new data shows there is
meaningful competition for all size orders within the PIM, whether
there is significant price improvement for all orders executed through
the PIM, and whether there is an active and liquid market functioning
on the Exchange outside of the PIM.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act. Specifically, the
Exchange believes that, by extending the expiration of the Pilot
Programs, the proposed rule change will allow for further analysis of
the PIM. In doing so, the proposed rule change will also serve to
promote regulatory clarity and consistency, thereby reducing burdens on
the marketplace and facilitating investor protection.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any written comments from members or other interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \6\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \7\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay
period because the Pilot Programs are set to expire on July 17, 2015.
The Exchange noted that such waiver will allow the Pilot Programs to
continue uninterrupted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, as
it will allow the Pilot Programs to continue uninterrupted, thereby
avoiding any potential investor confusion that could result from a
temporary interruption in the Pilot Programs. For this reason, the
Commission designates the proposed rule change to be operative on July
17, 2015.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ For purposes only of waiving the operative delay for this
proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact
on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2015-23 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2015-23. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal

identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2015-23, and should be submitted on
or before August 13, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-18031 Filed 7-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


5. Each lime kiln and each associated lime cooler, if there is a separate exhaust to the atmosphere from the associated lime cooler, and which uses a negative pressure PM control device. Measure PM emissions ................ Method 5 in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. Conduct the test( s) at the highest production level reasonably expected to occur; the minimum sampling volume must be 0.85 dscm ( 30 dscf); if there is a separate lime cooler exhaust to the atmosphere, you must conduct the Method 5 test of the cooler exhaust concurrently with the kiln exhaust test. 6. Each lime kiln and each associated lime cooler, if there is a separate exhaust to the atmosphere from the associated lime cooler, and which uses a positive pressure fabric filter or ESP. Measure PM emissions ................ Method 5D in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. Conduct the test( s) at the highest production level reasonably expected to occur; if there is a separate lime cooler exhaust to the atmosphere, you must conduct the Method 5 test of the separate cooler exhaust concurrently with the kiln exhaust test. 7. Each lime kiln ............................ Determine the mass rate of stone feed to the kiln during the kiln PM emissions test. Any suitable device ...................... Calibrate and maintain the device according to manufacturer's instructions the measuring device used must be accurate to within ± 5 percent of the mass rate over its operating range. 8. Each lime kiln equipped with a wet scrubber. Establish the operating limit for the average gas stream pressure drop across the wet scrubber Data for the gas stream pressure drop measurement device during the kiln PM performance test. The continuous pressure drop measurement device must be accurate within plus or minus 1 percent; you must collect the pressure drop data during the period of the performance test and determine the operating limit according to 63.7112( j). 9. Each lime kiln equipped with a wet scrubber. Establish the operating limit for the average liquid flow rate to the scrubber. Data from the liquid flow rate measurement device during the kiln PM performance test. The continuous scrubbing liquid flow rate measuring device must be accurate within plus or minus 1 percent; you must collect the flow rate data during the period of the performance test and determine the operating limit according to 63.7112( j). 10. Each lime kiln equipped with an ESP, except ESP monitored with a PM detector in lieu of monitoring ESP parameters. Establish the operating limits for the average current and the average voltage supplied to each field of the ESP. The ESP operating data during the kiln PM performance test. You must collect the current and voltage data during the period of the performance test and determine the operating limits for both parameters according to 63.7112( j).

VerDate 0ct< 31> 2002 16: 15 Dec 19, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 20DEP2. SGM 20DEP2 78081 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 4 TO SUBPART AAAAA OF PART 63.   REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS   Continued [ You must conduct each performance test in the following table that applies to you, as required in § 63.7112]

For . . . You must . . . Using . . . According to the following requirements . . .

11. ( a) Each lime kiln equipped with a fabric filter or ESP that is monitored with a PM detector. Have installed and have operating the bag leak detector or PM detector respectively prior to the performance test. Standard operating procedures incorporated into the OM& M plan. According to the requirements in § 63.7113( d) or ( e), respectively

11. ( b) Each lime kiln equipped with a fabric filter or ESP that is monitored with a COMS. Have installed and have operating the COMS prior to the performance test. Standard operating procedures incorporated into the OM& M plan and as required by 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, General Provisions and according to PS   1 of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter. According to the requirements in § 63.7113( g).

12. Each stack emission from an MPO, vent from a building enclosing an MPO, or set of multiple storage bins with combined stack emissions, which is subject to a PM emission limit. Measure PM emissions ................ Method 5 or Method 17 in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The sample volume must be at least 1.70 dscm ( 60 dscf); for Method 5, if the gas stream being sampled is at ambient temperature, the sampling probe and filter may be operated without heaters; and if the gas stream is above ambient temperature, the sampling probe and filter may be operated at a temperature high enough, but no higher than 121 ° C ( 250 ° F), to prevent water condensation on the filter ( Method 17 may be used only with exhaust gas temperatures of not more than 250 ° F). 13. Each stack emission from an MPO, vent from a building enclosing an MPO, or set of multiple storage bins with combined stack emissions, which is subject to an opacity limit. Conduct opacity observations ...... Method 9 in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test duration must be for at least 3 hours and you must obtain at least thirty, 6 minute averages.

14. Each stack emissions source from an MPO subject to a PM or opacity limit, which uses a wet scrubber. Establish the average gas stream pressure drop across the wet scrubber. Data for the gas stream pressure drop measurement device during the MPO stack PM performance test. The pressure drop measurement device must be accurate within plus or minus 1 percent; you must collect the pressure drop data during the period of the performance test and determine the average level. 15. Each stack emissions source from an MPO subject to a PM or opacity limit, which uses a wet scrubber. Establish the operating limit for the average liquid flow rate to the scrubber. Data from the liquid flow rate measurement device during the MPO stack PM performance test. The continuous scrubbing liquid flow rate measuring device must be accurate within plus or minus 1 percent; you must collect the flow rate data during the period of the performance test and determine the operating limit according to § 63.7112( c). 16. Each fabric filter that controls emissions from only an individual enclosed, new or existing storage bin. Conduct opacity observations ...... Method 9 in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test duration must be for at least 1 hour and you must obtain ten 6 minute averages.

17. Fugitive emissions from any MPO subject to an opacity limit. Conduct opacity observations ...... Method 9 in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test duration must be for at least 3 hours, but the 3 hour test may be reduced to 1 hour if there are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity and there are no more than three readings of 10 percent during the first 1 hour period.

VerDate 0ct< 31> 2002 16: 15 Dec 19, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 20DEP2. SGM 20DEP2 78082 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 4 TO SUBPART AAAAA OF PART 63.   REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS   Continued [ You must conduct each performance test in the following table that applies to you, as required in § 63.7112]

For . . . You must . . . Using . . . According to the following requirements . . .

18. Each building enclosing any MPO, that is subject to a VE limit. Conduct VE check ........................ The specifications in § 63.7112( k). The performance test must be conducted while all affected materials processing operations within the building are operating the performance test for each affected building must be at least 75 minutes, with each side of the building and roof being observed for at least 15 minutes.

TABLE 5 TO SUBPART AAAAA OF PART 63   CONTINUOUS COMPLIANCE WITH OPERATING LIMITS [ You must demonstrate continuous compliance with each operating limit that applies to you, according to the following table, as required in § 63.7121]

For . . . For the following operating limit . . . You must demonstrate continuous compliance by . . .

1. Each lime kiln controlled by a wet scrubber .. Maintain the 3 hour rolling average exhaust gas stream pressure drop across the wet scrubber greater than or equal to the pressure drop operating limit established during the PM performance test; and maintain the 3 hour rolling average scrubbing liquid flow rate greater than or equal to the flow rate operating limit established during the performance test. Collecting the wet scrubber operating according to all applicable requirements in § 63.7113 and reducing the data according to § 63.7113( a); maintaining the 3 hour rolling average exhaust gas stream pressure drop across the wet scrubber greater than or equal to the pressure drop operating limit established during the PM performance test; and maintaining the 3 hour rolling average scrubbing liquid flow rate greater than or equal to the flow rate operating limit established during the performance test ( the continuous scrubbing liquid flow rate measuring device must be accurate, within ± 1% and the continuous pressure drop measurement hour rolling device must be accurate within ± 1%). 2. Each lime kiln or lime cooler equipped with a fabric filter and using a bag leak detector, and each lime kiln equipped with an ESP using a PM detector in lieu of ESP parameter monitoring. a. Maintain and operate the fabric filter or ESP such that the bag leak or PM detector alarm, respectively, is not activated and alarm condition does not exist for more than 5 percent of the total operating time in a 6 month period. ( i) Operating the fabric filter or ESP so that the alarm on the bag leak or PM detection system, respectively, is not activated and alarm condition does not exist for more than 5 percent of the total operating time in each 6 month reporting period; and continuously recording the output from the bag leak or PM detection system. ( ii) Each time the alarm sounds and the owner or operator initiates corrective actions within 1 hour of the alarm, 1 hour of alarm time will be counted ( if the owner or operator takes longer than 1 hour to initiate corrective actions, alarm time will be counted as the actual amount of time taken by the owner or operator to initiate corrective actions); if inspection of the fabric filter or ESP system demonstrates that no corrective actions are necessary, no alarm time will be counted. 3. Each lime kiln equipped with an ESP, except an ESP monitoring PM with a PM detector or COMS. Maintain the 3 hour rolling average current and voltage input to each electrical field of the ESP greater than or equal to the average current and voltage input to each field of the ESP established during the performance test. Collecting the ESP operating data according to all applicable requirements in § 63.7113 and reducing the data according to § 63.7113( a), and maintaining the 3 hour rolling average voltage input and current input to each field greater than or equal to voltage input and current input operating limits for each field established during the performance test.

VerDate 0ct< 31> 2002 16: 15 Dec 19, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 20DEP2. SGM 20DEP2 78083 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 5 TO SUBPART AAAAA OF PART 63   CONTINUOUS COMPLIANCE WITH OPERATING LIMITS   Continued [ You must demonstrate continuous compliance with each operating limit that applies to you, according to the following table, as required in § 63.7121]

For . . . For the following operating limit . . . You must demonstrate continuous compliance by . . .

4. Each stack emissions source form a MPO subject to an opacity limit, which is controlled by a wet scrubber. Maintain the 3 hour rolling average exhaust gas stream pressure drop across the wet scrubber greater than or equal to the pressure drop operating limit established during the PM performance test; and maintain the 3 hour rolling average scrubbing liquid flow rate greater than or equal to the flow rate operating limit established during the performance test. Collecting the wet scrubber operating data according to all applicable requirements in § 63.7113 and reducing the data according to § 63.7113( a); maintaining the 3 hour rolling average exhaust gas stream pressure drop across the wet scrubber greater than or equal to the pressure drop operating limit established during the PM performance test; and maintaining the 3 hour rolling average scrubbing liquid flow rate greater than or equal to the flow rate operating limit established during the performance test ( the continuous scrubbing liquid flow rate measuring device must be accurate within ± 1% and the continuous pressure drop measurement device must be accurate within ± 1%). 5. For each lime kiln or lime cooler equipped with a fabric filter or an ESP that uses a COMS as the monitoring device. a. Maintain and operate the fabric filter or ESP such that the average opacity for any 6 minute block period does not exceed 15 percent. i. Installing, maintaining, calibrating and operating a COMS as required by 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, General Provisions and according to PS   1 of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter. ii. Collecting the COMS data at a frequency of at least once every 15 seconds, determining block averages for each 6 minute period and demonstrating for each 6 minute block period the average opacity does not exceed 15 percent.

TABLE 6 TO SUBPART AAAAA OF PART 63.   PERIODIC MONITORING FOR COMPLIANCE WITH OPACITY AND VISIBLE EMISSIONS LIMITS [ You must periodically demonstrate compliance with each opacity and visible emission limit that applies to you, according to the following table, as required in § 63.7121]

For . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You must demonstrate ongoing compliance . . .

1. Each MPO subject to an opacity limitation as required in Table 1 to this subpart, or any vents from buildings subject to an opacity limitation. a. 7   15 percent opacity, depending on the materials processing operation, as required in Table 1 to this subpart. ( i) Conducting a monthly 1 minute VE check of each emission unit in accordance with § 63.7121( e); the check must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. ( ii) If no VE are observed in 6 consecutive monthly checks for any emission unit, you may decrease the frequency of VE checking from monthly to semi annually for that emission unit; if VE are observed during any semiannual check, you must resume VE checking of that emission unit on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no VE are observed in 6 consecutive monthly checks. ( iii) If no VE are observed during the semiannual check for any emission unit, you may decrease the frequency of VE checking from semi annually to annually for that emission unit; if VE are observed during any annual check, you must resume VE checking of that emission unit on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no VE are observed in 6 consecutive monthly checks.

VerDate 0ct< 31> 2002 16: 15 Dec 19, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 20DEP2. SGM 20DEP2 78084 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 6 TO SUBPART AAAAA OF PART 63.   PERIODIC MONITORING FOR COMPLIANCE WITH OPACITY AND VISIBLE EMISSIONS LIMITS   Continued [ You must periodically demonstrate compliance with each opacity and visible emission limit that applies to you, according to the following table, as required in § 63.7121]

For . . . For the following emission limitation . . . You must demonstrate ongoing compliance . . .

( iv) If VE are observed during any VE check, you must conduct a 6 minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter; you must begin the Method 9 test within 1 hour of any observation of VE and the 6 minute opacity reading must not exceed the applicable opacity limit. 2. Any building subject to a VE limit, according to item 6 of Table 1 to this subpart. a. No VE .......................................................... ( i) Conducting a monthly VE check of the building, in accordance with the specifications in § 63.7112( k); the check must be conducted while all the enclosed according MPO are in operation. ( ii) The check for each affected building must be at least 5 minutes, with each side of the building and roof being observed for at least 1 minute. ( iii) If no VE are observed in 6 consecutive monthly checks of the building, you may decrease the frequency of checking from monthly to semi annually for that affected source; if VE are observed during any semi annual check, you must resume checking on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no VE are observed in 6 consecutive monthly checks. ( iv) If no VE are observed during the semi annual check, you may decrease the frequency of checking from semi annually to annually for that affected source; and if VE are observed during any annual check, you must resume checking of that emission unit on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no VE are observed in 6 consecutive monthly checks ( the source is in compliance if no VE are observed during any of these checks).

TABLE 7 TO SUBPART AAAAA OF PART 63.   REQUIREMENTS FOR REPORTS [ You must submit each report in this table that applies to you, as required in § 63.7131]

You must submit a . . . The report must contain . . . You must submit the report . . .

1. Compliance report .......................................... a. If there are no deviations from any emission limitations ( emission limit, operating limit, opacity limit, and VE limit) that applies to you, a statement that there were no deviations from the emission limitations during the reporting period. Semiannually according to the requirements in § 63.7131( b).

b. If there were no periods during which the CMS, including the operating parameter monitoring systems, was out of control as specified in § 63.8( c)( 7), a statement that there were no periods during which the CMS was out of control during the reporting period. c. If you have a deviation from any emission limitation ( emission limit, operating limit, opacity limit, and VE) during the reporting period, the report must contain the information in § 63.7131( c). d. If there were periods during which the CMS, including the operating parameter monitoring systems, was out of control, as specified in § 63.8( c)( 7), the report must contain the information in § 63.7131( e).

VerDate 0ct< 31> 2002 16: 15 Dec 19, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 20DEP2. SGM 20DEP2 78085 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 7 TO SUBPART AAAAA OF PART 63.   REQUIREMENTS FOR REPORTS   Continued [ You must submit each report in this table that applies to you, as required in § 63.7131]

You must submit a . . . The report must contain . . . You must submit the report . . .

e. If you had a startup, shutdown or malfunction during the reporting period and you took actions consistent with your SSMP, the compliance report must include the information in § 63.10( d)( 5)( i). 2. An immediate startup, shutdown, and malfunction report if you had a startup, shutdown or malfunction during the reporting period that is not consistent with your SSMP. Actions taken for the event .............................. By fax or telephone within 2 working days after starting actions inconsistent with the SSMP.

3. An immediate startup, shutdown, and malfunction report if you had a startup, shutdown or malfunction during the reporting period that is not consistent with your SSMP. The information in § 63.10( d)( 5)( ii) .................. By letter within 7 working days after the end of the event unless you have made alternative arrangements with the permitting authority See § 63.10( d)( 5)( ii).

TABLE 8 TO SUBPART AAAAA OF PART 63.   APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART AAAAA [ You must comply with the applicable General Provisions requirements according to the following table]

Citation Summary of requirement Am I subject to this requirement Explanations 63.1( a)( 1)   ( 4) ....................... Applicability ...................................................... Yes. 63.1( a)( 5) ............................. .......................................................................... No. 63.1( a)( 6) ............................. Applicability ...................................................... Yes. 63.1( a)( 7)   ( a)( 9) .................. .......................................................................... No. 63.1( a)( 10)   ( a)( 14) .............. Applicability ...................................................... Yes. 63.1( b)( 1) ............................. Initial Applicability Determination ..................... Yes ................... § § 63.7081 and 63.7142 specify additional applicability determination requirements. 63.1( b)( 2) ............................. .......................................................................... No. 63.1( b)( 3) ............................. Initial Applicability Determination ..................... Yes. 63.1( c)( 1) ............................. Applicability After Standard Established .......... Yes. 63.1( c)( 2) ............................. Permit Requirements ....................................... No ..................... Area sources not subject to subpart AAAAA, except all sources must make initial applicability determination. 63.1( c)( 3) ............................. .......................................................................... No. 63.1( c)( 4)   ( 5) ....................... Extensions, Notifications .................................. Yes. 63.1( d) ................................. .......................................................................... No. 63.1( e) ................................. Applicability of Permit Program ....................... Yes. 63.2 ...................................... Definitions ........................................................ ........................... Additional definition in § 63.7143. 63.3( a)   ( c) ........................... Units and Abbreviations ................................... Yes. 63.4( a)( 1)   ( a)( 2) .................. Prohibited Activities .......................................... Yes. 63.4( a)( 3)   ( a)( 5) .................. .......................................................................... No. 63.4( b)   ( c) ........................... Circumvention, Severability ............................. Yes. 63.5( a)( 1)   ( 2) ....................... Construction/ Reconstruction ............................ Yes. 63.5( b)( 1) ............................. Compliance Dates ............................................ Yes. 63.5( b)( 2) ............................. .......................................................................... No. 63.5( b)( 3)   ( 4) ....................... Construction Approval, Applicability ................ Yes. 63.5( b)( 5) ............................. .......................................................................... No. 63.5( b)( 6) ............................. Applicability ...................................................... Yes. 63.5( c) .................................. .......................................................................... No. 63.5( d)( 1)   ( 4) ....................... Approval of Construction/ Reconstruction ........ Yes. 63.5( e) ................................. Approval of Construction/ Reconstruction ........ Yes. 63.5( f)( 1)   ( 2) ........................ Approval of Construction/ Reconstruction ........ Yes. 63.6( a) ................................. Compliance for Standards and Maintenance .. Yes. 63.6( b)( 1)   ( 5) ....................... Compliance Dates ............................................ Yes. 63.6( b)( 6) ............................. .......................................................................... No. 63.6( b)( 7) ............................. Compliance Dates ............................................ Yes. 63.6( c)( 1)   ( 2) ....................... Compliance Dates ............................................ Yes. 63.6( c)( 3)   ( c)( 4) ................... .......................................................................... No. 63.6( c)( 5) ............................. Compliance Dates ............................................ Yes. 63.6( d) ................................. .......................................................................... No. 63.6( e)( 1) ............................. Operation & Maintenance ................................ Yes ................... See also § 63.7100 for OM& M requirements. 63.6( e)( 2) ............................. .......................................................................... No. 63.6( e)( 3) ............................. Startup, Shutdown Malfunction Plan ............... Yes. 63.6( f)( 1)   ( 3) ........................ Compliance with Emission Standards ............. Yes. 63.6( g)( 1)   ( g)( 3) .................. Alternative Standard ........................................ Yes. 63.6( h)( 1)   ( 2) ....................... Opacity/ VE Standards ...................................... Yes.. 63.6( h)( 3) ............................. .......................................................................... No.

VerDate 0ct< 31> 2002 16: 15 Dec 19, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 20DEP2. SGM 20DEP2 78086 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 8 TO SUBPART AAAAA OF PART 63.   APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART AAAAA   Continued [ You must comply with the applicable General Provisions requirements according to the following table]

Citation Summary of requirement Am I subject to this requirement Explanations 63.6( h)( 4)   ( h)( 5)( i) ............... Opacity/ VE Standards ...................................... Yes ................... This requirement only applies to opacity and VE performance checks required in Table 4 to subpart AAAAA. 63.6( h)( 5)( ii)   ( iii) .................. Opacity/ VE Standards ...................................... No ..................... Test durations are specified in subpart AAAAA; subpart AAAAA takes precedence. 63.6( h)( 5)( iv) ........................ Opacity/ VE Standards ...................................... No. 63.6( h)( 5)( v) ......................... Opacity/ VE Standards ...................................... Yes. 63.6( h)( 6) ............................. Opacity/ VE Standards ...................................... Yes. 63.6( h)( 7) ............................. COM Use ......................................................... No ..................... No COM required under subpart AAAAA. 63.6( h)( 8) ............................. Compliance with Opacity and VE .................... Yes. 63.6( h)( 9) ............................. Adjustment of Opacity Limit ............................. Yes. 63.6( i)( 1)   ( i)( 14) ................... Extension of Compliance ................................. Yes. 63.6( i)( 15) ............................ .......................................................................... No. 63.6( i)( 16) ............................ Extension of Compliance ................................. Yes. 63.6( j) ................................... Exemption from Compliance ............................ Yes. 63.7( a)( 1)   ( a)( 3) .................. Performance Testing Requirements ................ Yes ................... § 63.7110 specifies deadlines; § 63.7112 has additional specific requirements. 63.7( b) ................................. Notification ....................................................... Yes. 63.7( c) .................................. Quality Assurance/ Test Plan ........................... Yes. 63.7( d) ................................. Testing Facilities .............................................. Yes. 63.7( e)( 1)   ( 4) ....................... Conduct of Tests .............................................. Yes. 63.7( f) .................................. Alternative Test Method ................................... Yes. 63.7( g) ................................. Data Analysis ................................................... Yes. 63.7( h) ................................. Waiver of Tests ................................................ Yes. 63.8( a)( 1) ............................. Monitoring Requirements ................................. Yes ................... See also § 63.7113. 63.8( a)( 2) ............................. Monitoring ........................................................ Yes. 63.8( a)( 3) ............................. .......................................................................... No. 63.8( a)( 4) ............................. Monitoring ........................................................ No ..................... Flares not applicable. 63.8( b)( 1)   ( 3) ....................... Conduct of Monitoring ...................................... Yes. 63.8( c)( 1)   ( 3) ....................... CMS Operation/ Maintenance ........................... Yes. 63.8( c)( 4) ............................. CMS Requirements .......................................... No ..................... See § 63.7121. 63.8( c)( 4)( i)   ( ii) .................... Cycle Time for COM and CEMS ..................... No ..................... No COM or CEMS are required under subpart AAAAA; see § 63.7113 for CPMS requirements 63.8( c)( 5) ............................. Minimum COM procedures .............................. No COM not required. 63.8( c)( 6) ............................. CMS Requirements .......................................... No See § 63.7113. 63.8( c)( 7)   ( 8) ....................... CMS Requirements .......................................... Yes. 63.8( d) ................................. Quality Control ................................................. No ..................... See § 63.7113. 63.8( e) ................................. Performance Evaluation for CMS .................... No. 63.8( f)( 1)   ( f)( 5) .................... Alternative Monitoring Method ......................... Yes. 63.8( f)( 6) .............................. Alternative to Relative Accuracy test ............... No. 63.8( g)( 1)   ( g)( 5) .................. Data Reduction; Data That Cannot Be Used .. No ..................... See data reduction requirements in § § 63.7120 and 63.7121. 63.9( a) ................................. Notification Requirements ................................ Yes ................... See also § 63.7130 63.9( b) ................................. Initial Notifications ............................................ Yes. 63.9( c) .................................. Request for Compliance Extension ................. Yes. 63.9( d) ................................. New Source Notification for Special Compliance Requirements. Yes.

63.9( e) ................................. Notification of Performance Test ..................... Yes. 63.9( f) .................................. Notification of VE/ Opacity Test ........................ Yes ................... This requirement only applies to opacity and VE performance tests required in Table 4 to subpart AAAAA. Notification not required for VE/ opacity test under Table 6 to subpart AAAAA. 63.9( g) ................................. Additional CMS Notifications ........................... No ..................... Not required for operating parameter monitoring 63.9( h)( 1)   ( h)( 3) .................. Notification of Compliance Status .................... Yes. 63.9( h)( 4) ............................. .......................................................................... No.. 63.9( h)( 5)   ( h)( 6) .................. Notification of Compliance Status .................... Yes. 63.9( i) ................................... Adjustment of Deadlines .................................. Yes. 63.9( j) ................................... Change in Previous Information ...................... Yes. 63.10( a) ............................... Recordkeeping/ Reporting General Requirements Yes ................... See § § 63.7131 through 63.7133.

63.10( b)( 1)   ( b)( 2)( xii) .......... Records ............................................................ Yes. 63.10( b)( 2)( xiii) .................... Records for Relative Accuracy Test ................ No. 63.10( b)( 2)( xiv) .................... Records for Notification ................................... Yes. 63.10( b)( 3) ........................... Applicability Determinations ............................. Yes. 63.10( c) ................................ Additional CMS Recordkeeping ....................... No ..................... See § 63.7132. 63.10( d)( 1) ........................... General Reporting Requirements .................... Yes.

VerDate 0ct< 31> 2002 16: 15 Dec 19, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 20DEP2. SGM 20DEP2 78087 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2002 / Proposed Rules TABLE 8 TO SUBPART AAAAA OF PART 63.   APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART AAAAA   Continued [ You must comply with the applicable General Provisions requirements according to the following table]

Citation Summary of requirement Am I subject to this requirement Explanations 63.10( d)( 2) ........................... Performance Test Results ............................... Yes. 63.10( d)( 3) ........................... Opacity or VE Observations ............................ Yes ................... For the periodic monitoring requirements in Table 6 to subpart AAAAA, report according to § 63.10( d)( 3) only if VE observed and subsequent visual opacity test is required. 63.10( d)( 4) ........................... Progress Reports ............................................. Yes. 63.10( d)( 5) ........................... Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction Reports ......... Yes. 63.10( e) ............................... Additional CMS Reports .................................. No ..................... See specific requirements in subpart AAAAA, see § 63.7131. 63.10( f) ................................ Waiver for Recordkeeping/ Reporting ............... Yes. 63.11( a)   ( b) ......................... Control Device Requirements .......................... No ..................... Flares not applicable. 63.12( a)   ( c) ......................... State Authority and Delegations ...................... Yes. 63.13( a)   ( c) ......................... State/ Regional Addresses ............................... Yes. 63.14( a)   ( b) ......................... Incorporation by Reference ............................. Yes. ASTM 6420   99 and 6735   01 ( see § 63.14). 63.15( a)   ( b) ......................... Availability of Information ................................. Yes.

* * * * * [ FR Doc. 02   31233 Filed 12   19   02; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   P VerDate 0ct< 31> 2002 16: 15 Dec 19, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\ FR\ FM\ 20DEP2. SGM 20DEP2


[Federal Register: March 24, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 57)]
[Notices]
[Page 15501-15502]
[DOCID:fr24mr08-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP08-218-000]

Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C.; Notice of Amendment To
Petition for Temporary Waiver of Tariff Provisions and Request for
Expedited Action

March 14, 2008.
    Take notice that on March 13, 2008, Gulfstream Natural Gas System,
L.L.C. (Gulfstream) tendered for filing an amendment in the referenced
docket to its February 28, 2008 Petition for Temporary Waiver of Tariff
Provisions.
    Gulfstream states that the purpose of the amendment is to change
the period over which its temporary waiver with respect to loan service
will be

applicable during the April 2008 outages to the period commencing on
the first gas day of the first outage through and including the 30th
gas day following the second outage. This amendment will allow
Gulfstream's firm customers who take loans of line pack during the
April 2008 outages up to 30 days following the end of the second outage
to return all line pack taken during both outages. In addition, in
order to ensure that the firm shippers have a timely understanding of
the availability of, and cost associated with, the parking and lending
services described in the Petition, as amended, Gulfstream requests
that the Commission expedite action on the amended Petition, shorten
the notice period to five days from the date of this filing, and grant
the Petition by March 21, 2008.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time Tuesday, March 18, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-5827 Filed 3-21-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 15306]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6484]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-3026-000]

Aspen Merchant Energy LP; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Aspen Merchant Energy LP's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is April 4, 2011.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 14, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-6484 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 5, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59526-59527]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24119]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Parts 100 and 165

[USCG-2019-0875]

2019 Quarterly Listings; Safety Zones, Security Zones, Special
Local Regulations and Regulated Navigation Areas

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notification of expired temporary rules issued.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notification of substantive rules
issued by the Coast Guard that were made temporarily effective but
expired before they could be published in the Federal Register. This
document lists temporary safety zones, security zones, special local
regulations and regulated navigation areas, all of limited duration and
for which timely publication in the Federal Register was not possible.

DATES: This document lists temporary Coast Guard rules that became
effective, primarily between July 2019 and September 2019, unless
otherwise indicated, and were terminated before they could be published
in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Temporary rules listed in this document may be viewed
online, under their respective docket numbers, using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions on this document contact
Yeoman First Class Glenn Grayer, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Coast Guard District Commanders and Captains
of the Port (COTP) must be immediately responsive to the safety and
security needs within their jurisdiction; therefore, District
Commanders and COTPs have been delegated the authority to issue certain
local regulations. Safety zones may be established for safety or
environmental purposes. A safety zone may be stationary and described
by fixed limits or it may be described as a zone around a vessel in
motion. Security zones limit access to prevent injury or damage to
vessels, ports, or waterfront facilities. Special local regulations are
issued to enhance the safety of participants and spectators at regattas
and other marine events. Regulated Navigation Areas are water areas
within a defined boundary for which regulations for vessels navigating
within the area have been established by the regional Coast Guard
District Commander.
    Timely publication of these rules in the Federal Register may be
precluded when a rule responds to an emergency, or when an event occurs
without sufficient advance notice. The affected public is, however,
often informed of these rules through Local Notices to Mariners, press
releases, and other means. Moreover, actual notification is provided by
Coast Guard patrol vessels enforcing the restrictions imposed by the
rule. Because Federal Register publication was not possible before the
end of the effective period, mariners were personally notified of the
contents of the safety zones, security zones, special local regulations
or regulated navigation areas listed in this notice by Coast Guard
officials on-scene prior to any enforcement action. However, the Coast
Guard, by law, must publish in the Federal Register notice of
substantive rules adopted. To meet this obligation without imposing
undue expense on the public, the Coast Guard periodically publishes a
list of these temporary safety zones, security zones, special local
regulations and regulated navigation areas. Permanent rules are not
included in this list because they are published in their entirety in
the Federal Register. Temporary rules are also published in their
entirety if sufficient time is available to do so before they are
placed in effect or terminated.
    The following unpublished rules were placed in effect temporarily
during the period between July 2019 and September 2019 unless otherwise
indicated. To view copies of these rules, visit www.regulations.gov and
search by the docket number indicated in the following table.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Docket No.                          Rule type                   Location           Effective date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USCG-2019-0144..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Lake Michigan.............       3/15/2019
USCG-2019-0141..........................  Special Local Regulations   Key West, FL..............       3/26/2019
                                           (Part 100).
USCG-2019-0389..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Rice's Landing, PA........        6/7/2019
USCG-2019-0490..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Captain of the port zone..       6/21/2019
USCG-2019-0374..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Friday Harbor, WA.........        7/1/2019
USCG-2012-1036..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Port Long Island Sound            7/3/2019
                                                                       Zone.
USCG-2019-0377..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Calcasieu Parish, LA......        7/3/2019
USCG-2019-0529..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  St. Louis, MO.............        7/3/2019
USCG-2019-0511..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Lake Michigan, MI.........        7/3/2019
USCG-2019-0391..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Marathon, FL..............        7/4/2019
USCG-2019-0505..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Key West, FL..............        7/4/2019
USCG-2019-0365..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Wheeling, WV..............        7/4/2019
USCG-2019-0305..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Monongahela, PA...........        7/4/2019
USCG-2012-1036..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Port Long Island Sound            7/4/2019
                                                                       Zone.
USCG-2019-0267..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Baltimore, MD.............        7/4/2019
USCG-2019-0550..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Washington, DC............        7/4/2019
USCG-2019-0316..........................  Special Local Regulations   Sarasota, FL..............        7/6/2019
                                           (Part 100).
USCG-2019-0363..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Toronto, OH...............        7/6/2019
USCG-2019-0538..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Glenbrook, NV.............       7/12/2019
USCG-2019-0578..........................  Special Local Regulations   Charlevoix, MI............       7/13/2019
                                           (Part 100).
USCG-2019-0532..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Harbor, Boston, MA........       7/13/2019
USCG-2019-0016..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Oak Ridge, TN.............       7/19/2019
USCG-2019-0628..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  San Juan, PR..............       7/19/2019
USCG-2019-0647..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Milwaukee, WI.............       7/25/2019
USCG-2019-0646..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  San Diego, CA.............       7/26/2019
USCG-2019-0627..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Chicago, IL...............       7/27/2019
USCG-2019-0643..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  New York Zone.............       7/27/2019
USCG-2019-0592..........................  Regulated Navigation Area   Seattle, WA...............        8/1/2019
                                           (Part 165).
USCG-2019-0573..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Seattle, WA...............        8/1/2019
USCG-2019-0650..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Hudson River, NY..........        8/3/2019

USCG-2019-0630..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Port Lake Michigan Zone...        8/3/2019
USCG-2019-0642..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Pittsburgh, PA............        8/4/2019
USCG-2019-0679..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Indian Island, WA.........        8/6/2019
USCG-2019-0658..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Monongahela, PA...........       8/10/2019
USCG-2019-0675..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Chicago, IL...............       8/10/2019
USCG-2019-0709..........................  Security Zones (Part 165).  Monaca, PA................       8/13/2019
USCG-2019-0710..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Oshkosh, WI...............       8/15/2019
USCG-2019-0688..........................  Special Local Regulations   Greenville, MS............       8/17/2019
                                           (Part 100).
USCG-2012-1036..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Long Island Zone..........       8/17/2019
USCG-2019-0644..........................  Special Local Regulations   Atlantic City, NJ.........       8/19/2019
                                           (Part 100).
USCG-2019-0737..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Cox Bay, LA...............       8/21/2019
USCG-2019-0605..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Harve de Grace, MD........       8/24/2019
USCG-2019-0722..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Lakeside, OH..............       8/31/2019
USCG-2019-0730..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Carnelian Bay, CA.........       8/31/2019
USCG-2019-0706..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Pittsburg, PA.............       8/31/2019
USCG-2019-0761..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Miami Port Zone...........       8/31/2019
USCG-2019-0671..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Tahoe City, CA............       8/31/2019
USCG-2019-0762..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Detroit, MI...............        9/1/2019
USCG-2019-0636..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Laughlin, NV..............        9/1/2019
USCG-2019-0445..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Oyster Bay, NY............        9/2/2019
USCG-2019-0088..........................  Security Zones (Part 165).  Jacksonville, FL..........        9/3/2019
USCG-2019-0759..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Chicago, IL...............        9/7/2019
USCG-2019-0231..........................  Special Local Regulations   Evansville, IL............       9/14/2019
                                           (Part 100).
USCG-2019-0689..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Islamorada, FL............       9/14/2019
USCG-2019-0778..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Philadelphia, PA..........       9/14/2019
USCG-2019-0651..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Manhattan, NY.............       9/15/2019
USCG-2019-0807..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Chicago, IL...............       9/21/2019
USCG-2019-0817..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Chicago, IL...............       9/25/2019
USCG-2019-0816..........................  Safety Zones (Part 165)...  Muscle Shoals, AL.........       9/27/2019
USCG-2012-1036..........................  Special Local Regulations   Long Island Sound, NY.....       9/28/2019
                                           (Part 100).
USCG-2019-0806..........................  Security Zones (Part 165).  Pittsburg, PA.............       9/30/2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: October 31, 2019.
M.W. Mumbach,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, United States
Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2019-24119 Filed 11-4-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P