[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 30, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24601-24603]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10542]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0497; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-209-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A300 series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a
report of reduction of the de-icing performance of the pitot probe over
time that could remain hidden to the flight crew. This proposed AD
would require repetitive detailed inspections of the pitot probe heater
insulation resistance, and replacement of the pitot probe heater if
necessary. We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 14, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Airbus
SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33 5 61 93
44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0497; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2017-0497;
Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-209-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD
2016-0248, dated December 15, 2016 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus Model A300 series airplanes.
The MCAI states:

    An operator reported a reduction of the de-icing performance of
the pitot probe over the time. Pitot probes are heated to prevent
ice accretion. De-icing performances of the Pitot probe might be
reduced if Pitot probe heater degrades over time. Investigation
results highlighted that the magnitude of de-icing performance
reduction depended on how much the [pitot probe] heater is degraded.
This degradation could remain hidden to the crew.
    Pitot probes heater degradation, if not detected and corrected,
could lead to unreliable airspeed indications, possibly resulting in
reduced control of the aeroplane.
    To ensure nominal de-icing performances of the Pitot probe,
Airbus developed an inspection process to check the pitot [probe]
heater performance, and published Service Bulletin (SB) A300-34-0185
to provide the necessary instructions to operators.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires
repetitive detailed inspections (DET) of the pitot [probe] heater,
and, depending on findings, replacement with a serviceable one.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0497.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Airbus Service Bulletin A300-34-0185, Revision 00,
dated August 29, 2016. The service information describes procedures for
repetitive detailed inspections of the pitot probe heater insulation
resistance and replacement of the pitot probe heater. This service
information is reasonably available because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 5 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
              Action                    Labor cost        Parts cost      Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repetitive inspection............  5 work-hours x $85               $0  $425 per inspection  $2,125 per
                                    per hour = $425                      cycle.               inspection cycle.
                                    per inspection
                                    cycle..
Reporting........................  1 work hour x $85                 0  $85................  $425 per inspection
                                    per hour = $85.                                           cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the results of the proposed inspection.
We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need
this replacement:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                  Action                                Labor cost                 Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement...............................  3 work-hours x $85 per hour = $255          $9,015           $9,270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paperwork Reduction Act

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information required by this proposed AD
is 2120-0056. The paperwork cost associated with this proposed AD has
been detailed in the Costs of Compliance section of this document and
includes time for reviewing instructions, as well as completing and
reviewing the collection of information. Therefore, all reporting
associated with this proposed AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the
accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC
20591, ATTN: Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2017-0497; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-
209-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by July 14, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 B2-1A, B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-
203, B4-2C, B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes, certificated in any
category, all manufacturer serial numbers.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 34, Navigation.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report of reduction of the de-icing
performance of the pitot probe over time that could remain hidden to
the flight crew. We are issuing this AD to ensure nominal de-icing
performance of the pitot probe in order to prevent unreliable
airspeed indications, which could result in reduced control of the
airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Definition of Pitot Probes

    For the purpose of this AD, affected pitot probes are the First
Officer's Pitot Probe 40DA, Captain's Pitot Probe 41DA, and Standby
Pitot Probe 42DA.

(h) Repetitive Inspections

    At the time specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD,
whichever occurs later, do a detailed inspection of the pitot probe
heater insulation resistance on each affected pitot probe, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A300-34-0185, Revision 00, dated August 29, 2016. Repeat
the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 24 months.
    (1) Within 24 months since the last detailed inspection of the
pitot probe heater insulation resistance, as specified in Airbus
A300 Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM), Task 30-31-00.
    (2) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD.

(i) Corrective Action

    If, during any detailed inspection as required by paragraph (h)
of this AD, any pitot probe fails the test, as specified in the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-34-0185,
Revision 00, dated August 29, 2016, before further flight, replace
the affected pitot probe with a serviceable (new or inspected as
required by this AD) pitot probe, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-34-0185,
Revision 00, dated August 29, 2016. Replacement of pitot probes, as
required by paragraph (i) of this AD, does not constitute
terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by
paragraph (h) of this AD.

(j) Reporting

    At the applicable times required by paragraphs (j)(1) or (j)(2)
of this AD: Submit a report of the findings (both positive and
negative) of each inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD,
as specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A300-34-0185, Revision 00, dated August 29, 2016, to Airbus
Service Bulletin Reporting Online Application on Airbus World
(https://w3.airbus.com/).
    (1) For inspections done before the effective date of this AD:
Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
    (2) For inspections done on or after the effective date of this
AD: Within 30 days after accomplishing each inspection required by
paragraph (h) of this AD.

(k) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the International Branch, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (l)(2) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a
person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5
minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of information. All
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing
the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave.
SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance
Officer, AES-200.
    (4) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by
paragraph (j) of this AD: If any service information contains
procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and
tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests
that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the
airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any
substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC
require approval of an AMOC.

(l) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA AD 2016-0248, dated December 15, 2016, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2017-0497.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax: +33 5 61 93 44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet: http://www.airbus.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 15, 2017.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-10542 Filed 5-26-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36332-36333]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15494]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PF15-13-000]

Cameron LNG, LLC, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental
Assessment for the Planned Cameron Lng Expansion Project, and Request
for Comments on Environmental Issues

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of the Cameron LNG Expansion Project
(Project) involving construction and operation of facilities by Cameron
LNG, LLC (Cameron) in Cameron and Calcasieu Parishes, Louisiana. The
Commission will use this EA in its decision-making process to determine
whether the project is in the public interest.
    This notice announces the opening of the scoping process the
Commission will use to gather input from the public and interested
agencies on the Project. You can make a difference by providing us with
your specific comments or concerns about the Project. Your comments
should focus on the potential environmental effects, reasonable
alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental impacts.
Your input will help the Commission staff determine what issues they
need to evaluate in the EA. To ensure that your comments are timely and
properly recorded, please send your comments so that the Commission
receives them in Washington, DC on or before July 20, 2015.
    If you sent comments on this project to the Commission before the
opening of this docket on February 24, 2015, you will need to file
those comments in Docket No. PF15-13-000 to ensure they are considered
as part of this proceeding.
    This notice is being sent to the Commission's current environmental
mailing list for this project. State and local government
representatives should notify their constituents of this planned
project and encourage them to comment on their areas of concern.
    A fact sheet prepared by the FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural
Gas Facility On My Land? What Do I Need To Know?'' is available for
viewing on the FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov). This fact sheet addresses
a number of typically asked questions, including the use of eminent
domain and how to participate in the Commission's proceedings.

Public Participation

    For your convenience, there are three methods you can use to submit
your comments to the Commission. The Commission encourages electronic
filing of comments and has expert staff available to assist you at
(202) 502-8258 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please carefully follow these
instructions so that your comments are properly recorded.
    (1) You can file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. This is an easy method for submitting brief,
text-only comments on a project;
    (2) You can file your comments electronically by using the eFiling
feature on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. With eFiling, you can provide comments in a
variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your submission.
New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking on
``eRegister.'' If you are filing a comment on a particular project,
please select ``Comment on a Filing'' as the filing type; or
    (3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the following address. Be sure to reference the project docket number
(PF15-13-000) with your submission: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Room 1A,
Washington, DC 20426.

Summary of the Planned Project

    Cameron plans to construct and operate facilities entirely within
its existing liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal. The Project would
increase liquefaction capacity by about 9.97 million tons per year and
storage of LNG by about 160,000 cubic meters. According to Cameron, it
is currently fully subscribed for the original liquefaction volume and
anticipates that affiliates of its partners would subscribe for the
capacity of this project as well.
    The Project would consist of the following facilities:
     Two additional liquefaction trains (Trains 4 and 5) with a
maximum LNG production capacity of 4.985 million tons per year;
     A fifth 160,000 cubic meter full containment LNG storage
tank to increase the total LNG storage capacity to 800,000 cubic
meters;
     A condensate product storage tank; and
     Associated utilities and infrastructure.
    The general location of the project facilities is shown in appendix
1.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The appendices referenced in this notice will not appear in
the Federal Register. Copies of the appendices were sent to all
those receiving this notice in the mail and are available at
www.ferc.gov using the link called ``eLibrary'' or from the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, or call<PHONE_NUMBER>. For instructions on
connecting to eLibrary, refer to the last page of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Land Requirements for Construction

    Construction of the planned facilities would be entirely within the
existing footprint of Cameron's liquefaction terminal.

The EA Process

    The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the
Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could
result from an action whenever it authorizes a project. NEPA also
requires us \2\ to discover and address concerns the public may have
about proposals. This process is referred to as scoping. The main goal
of the scoping process is to focus the analysis in the EA on the
important environmental issues. By this notice, the Commission requests
public comments on the scope of the issues to address in the EA. We
will consider all filed comments during the preparation of the EA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ ``We,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the environmental staff
of the Commission's Office of Energy Projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the EA we will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of
the construction and operation of the planned project under these
general headings:
     water resources;
     threatened and endangered species;
     cultural resources;
     air quality and noise;
     public safety; and
     cumulative impacts.
    We will also evaluate possible alternatives to the planned project
or

portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to lessen or
avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
    Although no formal application has been filed, we have already
initiated our NEPA review under the Commission's pre-filing process.
The purpose of the pre-filing process is to encourage early involvement
of interested stakeholders and to identify and resolve issues before
the FERC receives an application. As part of our pre-filing review, we
have begun to contact some federal and state agencies to discuss their
involvement in the scoping process and the preparation of the EA.
    The EA will present our independent analysis of the issues. The EA
will be available in the public record through eLibrary. Depending on
the comments received during the scoping process, we may also publish
and distribute the EA to the public for an allotted comment period. We
will consider all comments on the EA before we make our recommendations
to the Commission. To ensure we have the opportunity to consider and
address your comments, please carefully follow the instructions in the
Public Participation section, beginning on page 2.
    With this notice, we are asking agencies with jurisdiction by law
and/or special expertise with respect to the environmental issues
related to this project to formally cooperate with us in the
preparation of the EA.\3\ Agencies that would like to request
cooperating agency status should follow the instructions for filing
comments provided under the Public Participation section of this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Council on Environmental Quality regulations addressing
cooperating agency responsibilities are at Title 40, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 1501.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consultations Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act

    In accordance with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
implementing regulations for section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, we are using this notice to initiate consultation
with the applicable State Historic Preservation Office(s), and to
solicit their views and those of other government agencies, interested
Indian tribes, and the public on the Project's potential effects on
historic properties.\4\ We will define the project-specific Area of
Potential Effects (APE) in consultation with the SHPO(s) as the project
develops. On natural gas facility projects, the APE at a minimum
encompasses all areas subject to ground disturbance (examples include
construction right-of-way, contractor/pipe storage yards, compressor
stations, and access roads). Our EA for this project will document our
findings on the impacts on historic properties and summarize the status
of consultations under section 106.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation regulations
are at Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 800. Those
regulations define historic properties as any prehistoric or
historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in
or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Environmental Mailing List

    The environmental mailing list includes federal, state, and local
government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest groups; Native American Tribes; other
interested parties; and local libraries and newspapers. This list also
includes all affected landowners (as defined in the Commission's
regulations) who are potential right-of-way grantors, whose property
may be used temporarily for project purposes, or who own homes within
certain distances of aboveground facilities, and anyone who submits
comments on the project. We will update the environmental mailing list
as the analysis proceeds to ensure that we send the information related
to this environmental review to all individuals, organizations, and
government entities interested in and/or potentially affected by the
planned project.
    If we publish and distribute the EA, copies will be sent to the
environmental mailing list for public review and comment. If you would
prefer to receive a paper copy of the document instead of the CD
version or would like to remove your name from the mailing list, please
return the attached Information Request (appendix 2).

Becoming an Intervenor

    Once Cameron files its application with the Commission, you may
want to become an ``intervenor'' which is an official party to the
Commission's proceeding. Intervenors play a more formal role in the
process and are able to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be heard
by the courts if they choose to appeal the Commission's final ruling.
An intervenor formally participates in the proceeding by filing a
request to intervene. Instructions for becoming an intervenor are in
the User's Guide under the ``e-filing'' link on the Commission's Web
site. Please note that the Commission will not accept requests for
intervenor status at this time. You must wait until the Commission
receives a formal application for the project.

Additional Information

    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. Click on the
eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field (i.e., PF15-
13). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders,
notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.
    Finally, public meetings or site visits will be posted on the
Commission's calendar located at www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along with other related information.

    Dated: June 18, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-15494 Filed 6-23-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 123 (Monday, June 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41535-41536]
[FR Doc No: 2016-15133]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OW-2015-0665; FRL-9948-34-OW]
RIN 2040-ZA25

Preliminary 2016 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of the Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA) Preliminary 2016 Effluent Guidelines Program
Plan (Preliminary 2016 Plan) and solicits public comment. Section
304(m) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires EPA to biennially publish
a plan for new and revised effluent limitations guidelines, after
public review and comment. The Preliminary 2016 Plan identifies any new
or existing industrial categories selected for effluent guidelines or
pretreatment standards and provides a schedule for their development.
EPA typically publishes a preliminary plan upon which the public is
invited to comment, and then publishes a final plan thereafter. The
information and analyses from the 2015 Annual Review were used in
developing the Preliminary 2016 Plan.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 27, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-
2015-0665, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The
EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you
wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William F. Swietlik, Engineering
and Analysis Division, Office of Water, 4303T, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

    A. Supporting Documents--A key document providing additional
information includes the 2015 Annual Effluent Guidelines Review Report.
    B. How Can I Get Copies of These Documents and Other Related
Information?
    1. Docket. EPA has established official public dockets for these
actions under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2015-0665. The official public
docket is the collection of materials that are available for public
viewing at the Water Docket in the EPA Docket Center, (EPA/DC) EPA
West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    2. Electronic Access. You can access this Federal Register document
electronically through the United States government online source for
Federal regulations at http://www.regulations.gov.
    3. Internet access. Copies of the supporting documents are
available at http://www.epa.gov/eg/effluent-guidelines-plan.
    C. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
    Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
     Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and
page number).
     Follow directions--The agency might ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
     Explain why you agree or disagree, suggest alternatives,
and substitute language for your requested changes.
     Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used.
     If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
     Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
     Explain your views as clearly as possible.
     Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. How is this document organized?

    The outline of this notice follows.

A. Legal Authority
B. Summary of the Preliminary 2016 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan
C. Request for Public Comments and Information

A. Legal Authority

    This notice is published under the authority of the CWA, 33 U.S.C.
1251, et seq., and in particular sections 301(d),

304(b), 304(g), 304(m), 306, 307(b), and 308 of the Act, 33 U.S.C.
1311(d), 1314(b), 1314(g), 1314(m), 1316, 1317(b), and 1318.

B. Summary of the Preliminary 2016 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan

    EPA prepared the Preliminary 2016 Plan pursuant to CWA section
304(m). The Preliminary 2016 Plan provides a summary of EPA's review of
effluent guidelines and pretreatment standards, consistent with CWA
sections 301(d), 304(b), 304(g), 304(m), and 307(b). From these
reviews, the Preliminary 2016 Plan identifies any new or existing
industrial categories selected for effluent guidelines or pretreatment
standards rulemakings, and provides a schedule for such rulemakings. In
addition, the Preliminary 2016 Plan presents any new or existing
categories of industry selected for further review and analysis. The
Preliminary 2016 Plan and 2015 Annual Effluent Guidelines Review Report
can be found at http://www.epa.gov/eg/effluent-guidelines-plan.

C. Request for Public Comments and Information

    EPA requests comments and information on the following topics:
1. Data Sources and Methodologies
    EPA solicits comments on the evaluation factors, criteria, and data
sources used in conducting its 2015 Annual Review and in developing the
Preliminary 2016 Plan. EPA also solicits comment on other data sources
it might use in its annual reviews and biennial planning process.
2. The Preliminary 2016 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan
    EPA solicits comments on its Preliminary 2016 Plan, including the
data and information used to support the findings, actions, and
conclusions as stated in the Preliminary 2016 Plan. Specifically, EPA
solicits public comment and stakeholder input, data and information on:
    (a) Industry Reviews. EPA is initiating or continuing to review
wastewater discharges for the following industry categories: Iron and
Steel Manufacturing; Organic Chemicals, Plastics, and Synthetic Fibers;
Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard; Battery Manufacturing; and Electrical and
Electronic Components Manufacturing. EPA solicits data and information
regarding the discharge and treatment of pollutants identified in the
Preliminary 2016 Plan from these industrial processes, as well as any
other information relevant to EPA's review.
    (b) Continued Study of Centralized Waste Treatment (CWT)
facilities. EPA gathered information about CWT facilities across the
country and identified those facilities that currently accept or have
in the past accepted oil and gas extraction wastewaters. EPA included a
memorandum in the record that identifies these facilities. EPA requests
comment on the accuracy and completeness of the information contained
in this memorandum, as well as any other information relevant to EPA's
study of CWT facilities.
    (c) Conventional Extraction in the Oil and Gas Industry. EPA
solicits data and information for the first time on known transfers of
wastewater originating from conventional oil and gas extraction
facilities to Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs). In particular,
EPA seeks information on the extent to which this practice is
occurring, including the identification of conventional oil and gas
facilities which discharge to POTWs. EPA also requests information on
wastewater volumes transferred to POTWs as well as information on the
pollutants in these wastewater (type, concentration, etc.) and any
other known characteristics of the pollutants.
    (d) Produced Water Discharges in the Oil and Gas Industry. EPA
solicits information for the first time on the quantity, composition,
and purpose of well treatment and workover fluids in produced water
discharges authorized under 40 CFR part 435, subpart E (Agricultural
and Wildlife Water Use Subcategory) which, if good enough quality, can
be used for wildlife or livestock watering or other agricultural uses,
and are actually put to such use during periods of discharge. EPA
solicits information on both conventional and unconventional oil and
gas extraction. For this solicitation, ``Well treatment fluids'' means
any fluid used to restore or improve productivity by chemically or
physically altering hydrocarbon-bearing strata after a well has been
drilled. ``Workover fluids'' means salt solutions, weighted brines,
polymers, or other specialty additives used in a producing well to
allow for maintenance, repair, or abandonment procedures.
3. Innovation and Technology in the Effluent Guidelines Program
    EPA solicits input on ideas, approaches and information on how to
design smart regulations to support emerging technologies as described
in ``A Strategy for American Innovation,'' prepared by the National
Economic Council and Office of Science and Technology Policy. October
2015. See: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/strategy_for_american_innovation_october_2015.pdf.

    Dated: June 17, 2016.
Joel Beauvais,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Water.
[FR Doc. 2016-15133 Filed 6-24-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: November 4, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 212)]
[Notices]
[Page 57164]
[DOCID:fr04no09-61]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP10-8-000]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket
Authorization

October 28, 2009.
    Take notice that on October 22, 2009, Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company (Tennessee), 1001 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas 77002, filed
in Docket No. CP10-8-000, an application pursuant to Sections 157.205
and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act
(NGA) as amended, to abandon by sale certain natural gas pipeline
laterals and appurtenant facilities located in Harris and Montgomery
Counties, Texas, to Alamo Pipeline, L.L.C. (Alamo), under Tennessee's
blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-413-000,\1\ all as more
fully set forth in the application which is on file with the Commission
and open to the public for inspection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 20 FERC ] 62,409 (1982).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Tennessee states that it proposes to abandon in place and by sale
to Alamo 15.33 miles of 6-inch diameter pipeline lateral (Line No. 21A-
100),\2\ 0.36 miles of 3-inch diameter pipeline lateral (Line No. 21A-
300),\3\ two receipt taps, and six delivery taps, as well as equipment
and associated appurtenances thereto. Tennessee also states that Alamo
would continue to operate the facilities following the closing of the
purchase and sales transaction. Tennessee further states that Alamo, an
intrastate pipeline that is subject to the jurisdiction of the Texas
Railroad Commission, would continue to operate the facilities in
natural gas service. Tennessee states that following the abandonment
and sale of the subject facilities to Alamo, the laterals would be
disconnected from Tennessee's mainlines (Line Nos. 100-1 and 100-3).
Tennessee estimates that it would cost approximately $14,220,000 to
construct similar facilities today.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 8 FPC 276 (1949).
    \3\ 6 FERC ] 62,073 (1979) and 9 FERC ] 61,248 (1979).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to Susan
T. Halbach, Senior Counsel, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, 1001
Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas 77002, via telephone at (713) 420-
5751, or facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER> or Debbie Kalisek, Analyst,
Certificates & Regulatory Compliance via telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    This filing is available for review at the Commission or may be
viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number filed to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at FERC
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or, for
TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. Comments, protests and interventions may
be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
intervenors to file electronically.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 60 days after
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of
the regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to the
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and
not withdrawn within 30 days after the allowed time for filing a
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the NGA.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-26472 Filed 11-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 24, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 205)]
[Notices]
[Page 60332]
[DOCID:fr24oc07-55]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER07-1297-000]

Chien Energy, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

October 17, 2007.
    Chien Energy, LLC (Chien Energy) filed an application for market-
based rate authority, with an accompanying rate schedule. The proposed
market-based rate schedule provides for the sale of energy and capacity
at market-based rates. Chien Energy also requested waivers of various
Commission regulations. In particular, Chien Energy requested that the
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Chien Energy.
    On October 16, 2007, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director,
Division of Tariffs and Market Development--West, granted the requests
for blanket approval under Part 34 (Director's Order). The Director's
Order also stated that the Commission would publish a separate notice
in the Federal Register establishing a period of time for the filing of
protests. Accordingly, any person desiring to be heard concerning the
blanket approvals of issuances of securities or assumptions of
liability by Chien Energy, should file a protest with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure. 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214 (2004).
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests is
November 15, 2007.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition to such blanket
approvals by the deadline above, Chien Energy is authorized to issue
securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a guarantor,
indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of another
person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some lawful
object within the corporate purposes of Chien Energy, compatible with
the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or appropriate for
such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by
continued approvals of Chien Energy's issuance of securities or
assumptions of liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the

docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may
be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-20891 Filed 10-23-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20570-20571]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08692]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0015; Notice 1]

Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Receipt of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Receipt of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, (CTA), has determined that
certain Continental replacement passenger car tires do not fully comply
with paragraph S5.5(f) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
No. 139, New Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light Vehicles. CTA has filed
an appropriate report dated January 7, 2015, pursuant to 49 CFR part
573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.

DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is May 18, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited at the beginning of this notice and
submitted by any of the following methods:
     Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by hand to: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The
Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except
Federal Holidays.
     Electronically: Submit comments electronically by: Logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at http://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Comments may also be faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that your comments were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted without change to  http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
    Documents submitted to a docket may be viewed by anyone at the
address and times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by following the online
instructions for accessing the dockets. DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
    The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received
before the close of business on the closing date indicated below will
be filed and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the extent possible. When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    I. CTA's Petition: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see
implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556), CTA submitted a petition for an
exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
    This notice of receipt of CTA's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
    II. Tires Involved: Affected are approximately 116,500 Continental
ExtremeContact DWS size 225/45R17 91W, Continental ExtremeContact DW
size 225/45R17 91W and General G-Max AS-03 size 225/45R17 91W passenger
car tires.
    III. Noncompliance: CTA explains that the noncompliance is that due
to mold labeling errors, the sidewall markings on the subject tires do
not correctly describe the actual number of plies in the tread area of
the tires as required by paragraph S5.5(f) of FMVSS No. 139.
Specifically, the Continental ExtremeContact DWS size 225/45R17 91W
tires were manufactured with

``Tread 4 Plies: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel + 1 Polyamide.'' The correct
labeling and stamping should have been ``Tread 5 Plies: 1 Polyester + 2
Steel + 2 Polyamide.'' The Continental ExtremeContact DW size 225/45R17
91W tires were manufactured with ``Tread 4 Plies: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel
+ 1 Polyamide.'' The correct labeling and stamping should have been
``Tread 5 Plies: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel + 2 Polyamide.'' The General G-
Max AS-03 size 225/45R17 91W tires were manufactured with ``Plies:
Tread: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel + 1 Polyamide.'' The correct labeling and
stamping should have been ``Plies: Tread: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel + 2
Polyamide.''
    IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S5.5 of FMVSS No. 110 requires in
pertinent part:

    S5.5 Tire Markings. Except as specified in paragraphs (a)
through (i) of S5.5, each tire must be marked on each sidewall with
the information specified in S5.5(a) through (d) and on one sidewall
with the information specified in S5.5(e) through (i) according to
the phase-in schedule specified in S7 of this standard . . .
    (f) The actual number of plies in the sidewall, and the actual
number of plies in the tread area, if different;

    V. Summary of CTA's Analyses: CTA stated its belief that the
subject noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety for
the following reasons:
    (A) CTA believes that the mislabeling of the number of plies on the
subject tires has no impact on the operational performance of the
subject tires or on the safety of vehicles on which these tires are to
be mounted. CTA states that the subject tires also meet or exceed all
of the performance requirements specified by FMVSS No. 139.
    (B) CTA states that they are unaware of any accidents or injuries
that have occurred as a result of this noncompliance.
    (C) CTA states that NHTSA has previously granted similar petitions
for Inconsequential Noncompliance's in the past.
    CTA has additionally informed NHTSA that it has corrected the
subject noncompliance.
    In summation, CTA believes that the described noncompliance of the
subject tires is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that its
petition, to exempt CTA from providing recall notification of
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted.
    NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject tires that CTA no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve equipment
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant tires under their control after CTA
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.

    Authority:  (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8).

Jeffrey Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compiance.
[FR Doc. 2015-08692 Filed 4-15-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 64490]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25533]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP14-44-000.
    Applicants: Energy West Development, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing to GT&38; C section 18 to
be effective 12/2/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/16/13.
    Accession Number: 20131016-5007.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/28/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-45-000.
    Applicants: East Tennessee Natural Gas, LLC.
    Description: Eastman Chemical 410456 Negotiated Rate to be
effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/16/13.
    Accession Number: 20131016-5095.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/28/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-46-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Tariff Revision and Clarification Filing October 2013
to be effective 11/16/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/16/13.
    Accession Number: 20131016-5125.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/28/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-47-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Negotiated Rate--Tenaska LPS RO to be effective 10/16/
2013.
    Filed Date: 10/16/13.
    Accession Number: 20131016-5131.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/28/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-48-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Tenaska LPS RO Negotiated Rate to be effective 10/16/
2013.
    Filed Date: 10/16/13.
    Accession Number: 20131016-5141.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/28/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-49-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Negotiated Rate Tenaska to be effective 10/16/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/16/13.
    Accession Number: 20131016-5146.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/28/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-50-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Volume No. 2--Cabot Oil & Gas and Southwestern Energy
Svs-Neg Rate and Non Conf to be effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/16/13.
    Accession Number: 20131016-5158.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/28/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-51-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: Volume No. 2--Anadarko Energy Services and MMGS--
Neg and Non Conforming Agmts to be effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/16/13.
    Accession Number: 20131016-5158.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/28/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-52-000.
    Applicants: Shell U.S. Gas & Power, LLC.
    Description: Petition of Shell U.S. Gas & Power, LLC. for
Declaratory Order and Request for Expedited Consideration.
    Filed Date: 10/16/13.
    Accession Number: 20131016-5178.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/13.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 17, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-25533 Filed 10-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 59)]
[Notices]
[Page 15429]
[DOCID:fr29mr10-54]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL03-153-005]

Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc;. Notice of Filing

March 22, 2010.
    Take notice that on December 15, 2008, Dynegy Power Marketing,
Inc., Dynegy Power Corp., El Segundo Power LLC, Long Beach Generation
LLC, Cabrillo Power I LLC and Cabrillo Power II LLC (collectively
Dynegy) hereby submitted a modified Stipulation and Agreement in
compliance with Commission Order dated November 14, 2008.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 29, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-6825 Filed 3-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 149 (Friday, August 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43235-43236]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16811]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1280-002; ER19-1281-003.
    Applicants: Broadlands Wind Farm LLC, Lexington Chenoa Wind Farm
LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Broadlands Wind Farm
LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 7/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20210730-5274.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/20/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1225-002.
    Applicants: Long Ridge Energy Generation LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Response to Request for Additional
Information to be effective 4/29/2021.
    Filed Date: 7/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20210730-5167.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/20/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1805-001.
    Applicants: Upper Missouri G. & T. Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Response to Deficiency Letter FERC
Nos. 1,2,3,5, and 11 to be effective 6/30/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5001.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1993-001.
    Applicants: Upper Missouri G. & T. Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Response to Deficiency Letter FERC
Nos. 1, 5, 7, 8, and 9 to be effective 5/25/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5000.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2137-001.
    Applicants: IR Energy Management LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Supplement to June 15, 2021
Application for Market-Based Rate Authorization to be effective 9/10/
2021.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5030.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2583-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to WMPA, Service
Agreement No. 5821; Queue No. AF2-101 to be effective 9/10/2020.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5015.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2584-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of WMPA,
Service Agreement No. 4233; Queue No. AB1-005 to be effective 8/31/
2021.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5016.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2585-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Q2 2021 Quarterly Filing of
City and County of San Francisco's WDT SA (SA 275) to be effective 6/
30/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5035.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2586-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SA Solar LGIA Filing to be
effective 7/19/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5039.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2587-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: RE Sumter (Sumter County Solar)
LGIA Termination Filing to be effective 8/2/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5040.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2588-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: First Revised ISA, SA No.
5958; Queue No. AC1-074/AC2-075 to be effective 7/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5050.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2589-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2021-08-02 Certificate of
Concurrence--Desert Quartzite to be effective 7/16/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5065.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2590-000.
    Applicants: Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Rate Schedule FERC No. 333
between Tri-State and United Power to be effective 10/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5076.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2591-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: OATT Modifications--Pursuant to
Order 676-I to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 7/27/21.
    Accession Number: 20210727-5180.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/17/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2592-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: CXA La Paloma Unexecuted
LGIA (TO SA 420) to be effective 8/3/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5088.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/23/21.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES21-61-000; ES21-62-000; ES21-63-000; ES21-64-000.
    Applicants: AEP Texas Inc., Appalachian Power Company, Indiana
Michigan Power Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma.
    Description: Application Under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act
for

Authorization to Issue Securities of AEP Texas Inc., et al.
    Filed Date: 7/30/21.
    Accession Number: 20210730-5206.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/20/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 2, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-16811 Filed 8-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53285-53288]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18311]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0003; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-103-AD;
Amendment 39-17922; AD 2014-15-19]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Type
Certificate Previously Held by Israel Aircraft Industries, Ltd.)
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013-03-23 for
all Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Type Certificate previously held by Israel
Aircraft Industries, Ltd.) Model Gulfstream G150 airplanes. AD 2013-03-
23 required revising the airplane flight manual (AFM) to include
procedures to advise the flightcrew of certain runway slope and anti-
ice corrections and takeoff distance values. This new AD requires
revising the Performance section of the AFM, which includes the revised
procedures. This AD was prompted by the issuance of a revision to the
AFM, which modifies runway slope and anti-ice corrections to both
V1 and takeoff distance values. We are issuing this AD to
prevent the use of published, non-conservative data, which could result
in the inability to meet the required takeoff performance, with a
consequent hazard to safe operation during performance-limited takeoff
operations.

DATES: This AD becomes effective October 14, 2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of October 14,
2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain other publications listed in this AD as of March
26, 2013 (78 FR 11567, February 19, 2013).

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0003; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation, P.O. Box 2206, Mail Station D-25, Savannah, GA
31402-2206; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.gulfstream.com/
productsupport/technicalpubs/pubs/index.htm. You may
view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Stafford, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2013-03-23, Amendment 39-17357 (78 FR 11567,
February 19, 2013). AD 2013-03-23 applied to all Gulfstream Aerospace
LP (Type Certificate previously held by Israel Aircraft Industries,
Ltd.) Model Gulfstream G150 airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on January 21, 2014 (79 FR 3339). The NPRM was
prompted by the issuance of a revision to the AFM, which modifies
runway slope and anti-ice corrections to both V1 and takeoff
distance values. The NPRM proposed to continue to require revising the
AFM to include procedures to advise the flightcrew of certain runway
slope and anti-ice corrections and takeoff distance values. The NPRM
also proposed to require revising the Performance section of the AFM,
which includes the revised procedures. We are issuing this AD to
prevent the use of published, non-conservative data, which could result
in the inability to meet the required takeoff performance, with a
consequent hazard to safe operation during performance-limited takeoff
operations.
    The Civil Aviation Authority of Israel (CAAI), which is the
aviation authority for Israel, has issued Israeli Airworthiness
Directive 01-12-02-02R1, April 23, 2013 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI
states:

    This [CAAI] AD mandates revised limitations in the G150 AFM,
pertaining to the Performance Section. Each operator must
incorporate Rev.17 to the G150 AFM and remove previous AFM TR 3
dated December 14, 2012.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0003-0002.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (79 FR 3339, January 21,
2014) or on the determination of the cost to the public.

``Contacting the Manufacturer'' Paragraph in This AD

    Since late 2006, we have included a standard paragraph titled
``Airworthy Product'' in all MCAI ADs in which the FAA develops an AD
based on a foreign authority's AD.
    The MCAI or referenced service information in an FAA AD often
directs the owner/operator to contact the manufacturer for corrective
actions, such as a repair. Briefly, the Airworthy Product paragraph
allowed owners/operators to use corrective actions provided by the
manufacturer if those actions were FAA-approved. In addition, the
paragraph stated that any actions approved by the State of Design
Authority (or its delegated agent) are considered to be FAA-approved.
    In the NPRM (79 FR 3339, January 21, 2014), we proposed to prevent
the use of repairs that were not specifically developed to correct the
unsafe condition, by requiring that the repair approval provided by the
State of Design Authority or its delegated agent specifically refer to
this FAA AD. This change was intended to clarify the method of
compliance and to provide operators with better visibility of repairs
that are specifically developed and approved to correct the unsafe
condition. In addition, we proposed to change the phrase ``its
delegated agent'' to include a design approval holder (DAH) with State
of Design Authority design organization approval (DOA), as applicable,
to refer to a DAH authorized to approve required repairs for the
proposed AD.
    No comments were provided to the NPRM (79 FR 3339, January 21,
2014) about these proposed changes. However, a comment was provided for
a similar NPRM, Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-101-AD (78 FR 78285,
December 26, 2013). The commenter stated the

following: ``The proposed wording, being specific to repairs,
eliminates the interpretation that Airbus messages are acceptable for
approving minor deviations (corrective actions) needed during
accomplishment of an AD mandated Airbus service bulletin.''
    This comment has made the FAA aware that some operators have
misunderstood or misinterpreted the Airworthy Product paragraph to
allow the owner/operator to use messages provided by the manufacturer
as approval of deviations during the accomplishment of an AD-mandated
action. The Airworthy Product paragraph does not approve messages or
other information provided by the manufacturer for deviations to the
requirements of the AD-mandated actions. The Airworthy Product
paragraph only addresses the requirement to contact the manufacturer
for corrective actions for the identified unsafe condition and does not
cover deviations from other AD requirements. However, deviations to AD-
required actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17, and anyone may request
the approval for an alternative method of compliance to the AD-required
actions using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    To address this misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the
Airworthy Product paragraph, we have changed that paragraph and
retitled it ``Contacting the Manufacturer.'' This paragraph now
clarifies that for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a
method approved by the FAA, the CAAI, or the CAAI's authorized
Designee. It also clarifies that if approved by the CAAI Designee, the
approval must include the Designee's authorized signature. Where
necessary throughout this AD, we also replaced any reference to
approvals of corrective actions with a reference to the Contacting the
Manufacturer paragraph.
    The Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph also clarifies that, if
approved by the CAAI Designee, the approval must include the Designee's
authorized signature. The Designee signature indicates that the data
and information contained in the document are CAAI-approved, which is
also FAA-approved. Messages and other information provided by the
manufacturer that do not contain the Designee's authorized signature
approval are not CAAI-approved, unless the CAAI directly approves the
manufacturer's message or other information.
    This clarification does not remove flexibility previously afforded
by the Airworthy Product paragraph. Consistent with long-standing FAA
policy, such flexibility was never intended for required actions. This
is also consistent with the recommendation of the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee to increase
flexibility in complying with ADs by identifying those actions in
manufacturers' service instructions that are ``Required for
Compliance'' with ADs. We continue to work with manufacturers to
implement this recommendation. But once we determine that an action is
required, any deviation from the requirement must be approved as an
alternative method of compliance.
    Other commenters to the NPRM discussed previously, Directorate
Identifier 2012-NM-101-AD (78 FR 78285, December 26, 2013), pointed out
that in many cases the foreign manufacturer's service bulletin and the
foreign authority's MCAI might have been issued some time before the
FAA AD. Therefore, the DOA might have provided U.S. operators with an
approved repair, developed with full awareness of the unsafe condition,
before the FAA AD is issued. Under these circumstances, to comply with
the FAA AD, the operator would be required to go back to the
manufacturer's DOA and obtain a new approval document, adding time and
expense to the compliance process with no safety benefit.
    Based on these comments, we removed the requirement that the DAH-
provided repair specifically refer to this AD. Before adopting such a
requirement, the FAA will coordinate with affected DAHs and verify they
are prepared to implement means to ensure that their repair approvals
consider the unsafe condition addressed in this AD. Any such
requirements will be adopted through the normal AD rulemaking process,
including notice-and-comment procedures, when appropriate. We also have
decided not to include a generic reference to either the ``delegated
agent'' or ``DAH with State of Design Authority design organization
approval,'' but instead we have provided the specific delegation
approval granted by the State of Design Authority for the DAH in the
Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph of this AD.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described
previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these
minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (79 FR 3339, January 21, 2014) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 3339, January 21, 2014).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 67 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $0 per
product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on
U.S. operators to be $5,695, or $85 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0003; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2013-03-23, Amendment 39-17357 (78 FR 11567, February 19, 2013), and
adding the following new AD:

2014-15-19 Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Type Certificate Previously Held
by Israel Aircraft Industries, Ltd.): Amendment 39-17922. Docket No.
FAA-2014-0003; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-103-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective October 14,
2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2013-03-23, Amendment 39-17357 (78 FR 11567,
February 19, 2013).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Type Certificate
previously held by Israel Aircraft Industries, Ltd.) Model
Gulfstream G150 airplanes, certificated in any category, all serial
numbers.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 01, Operations
information.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by the issuance of a revision to the
airplane flight manual (AFM), which modifies runway slope and anti-
ice corrections to both V1 and takeoff distance values.
We are issuing this AD to prevent the use of published, non-
conservative data, which could result in the inability to meet the
required takeoff performance, with a consequent hazard to safe
operation during performance-limited takeoff operations.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained AFM Revision

    This paragraph restates the actions required by paragraph (g) of
AD 2013-03-23, Amendment 39-17357 (78 FR 11567, February 19, 2013).
Within 60 days after March 26, 2013 (the effective date of AD 2013-
03-23), revise Section V, Performance, of the Gulfstream G150 AFM to
include the information in Gulfstream G150 Temporary Revision (TR)
3, dated December 14, 2011. This TR introduces corrections for
runway slope. Operate the airplane according to the procedures in
this TR.

    Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: The AFM revision required by
paragraph (g) of this AD may be done by inserting copies of
Gulfstream G150 TR 3, dated December 14, 2011, into the AFM. When
this TR has been included in general revisions of the AFM, the
general revisions may be inserted in the AFM, provided the relevant
information in the general revision is identical to that in
Gulfstream G150 TR 3, dated December 14, 2011, and the TR may be
removed.

(h) New AFM Revision

    Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the
Gulfstream G150 AFM to incorporate the information in Section V,
Performance, of the Gulfstream G150 AFM G150-1001-1, Revision 17,
dated April 17, 2013. Revision 17 of this AFM contains revisions of
runway slope and anti-ice corrections to the V1 and
takeoff distance values. Before further flight, after accomplishing
the revision, remove Gulfstream G150 TR 3, dated December 14, 2011,
or the information contained in Gulfstream G150 TR 3, dated December
14, 2011, from the AFM. Operate the airplane according to the
procedures in Section V, Performance, of Gulfstream G150 AFM G150-
1001-1, Revision 17, dated April 17, 2013. Revising the AFM to
Gulfstream G150 AFM G150-1001-1, Revision 17, dated April 17, 2013,
terminates the action required by paragraph (g) of this AD.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Tom Stafford,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information may be
emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the Civil
Aviation Authority of Israel (CAAI); or the CAAI's authorized
Designee. If approved by the CAAI Designee, the approval must
include the Designee's authorized signature.

(j) Special Flight Permits

    Special flight permits, as described in Section 21.197 and
Section 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199), are not allowed.

(k) Related Information

    Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI)
Israel Airworthiness Directive 01-12-02-02-R1, dated April 23, 2013,
for related information. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket
on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0003-0002.

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Gulfstream G150 AFM G150-1001-1, Revision 17, dated April
17, 2013.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
March 26, 2013 (78 FR 11567, February 19, 2013).
    (i) Gulfstream G150 Temporary Revision 3, dated December 14,
2011, to Section V, Performance, of the Gulfstream G150 AFM.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (4) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, P.O. Box 2206, Mail Station D-25,
Savannah, GA 31402-2206; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.gulfstream.com/
productsupport/technicalpubs/pubs/index.htm.
    (5) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (6) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records

Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 14, 2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-18311 Filed 9-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 42971]
[FR Doc No: 2023-14163]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-156, OMB Control No. 3235-0288]

Proposed Collection; Comment Request: Extension: Form 20-F

Upon Written Request Copies Available From:Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    Form 20-F (17 CFR 249.220f) is used to register securities of
foreign private issuers pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') (15 U.S.C. 78l) or as annual
and transitional reports pursuant to Sections 13 and 15(d) of the
Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) and 78o(d)). The information required in
the Form 20-F is used by investors in making investment decisions with
respect to the securities of such foreign private issuers. We estimate
that Form 20-F takes approximately 2,629.92 hours per response and is
filed by approximately 729 respondents. We estimate that 25% of the
2,629.92 hours per response (657.48 hours) is prepared by the issuer
for a total reporting burden of 479,303 (657.48 hours per response x
729 responses). Written comments are invited on: (a) whether this
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden imposed by the collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions
submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication by September 5,
2023.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    Please direct your written comment to David Bottom, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o John
Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to:
[email protected].

    Dated: June 29, 2023.
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-14163 Filed 7-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P