[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 212 (Friday, November 1, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58706-58707]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23839]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2785-001.

    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Amendment to ER19-2785-000 RE: AE2-
061 ISA No. 2142 to be effective 8/12/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/25/19.
    Accession Number: 20191025-5027.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-189-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Rate Schedule No. 96 to be
effective 12/23/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/24/19.
    Accession Number: 20191024-5127.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-190-000.
    Applicants: Crowned Ridge Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Crowned Ridge
Interconnection, LLC & Crowned Ridge Wind, LLC SFA to be effective 11/
25/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/24/19.
    Accession Number: 20191024-5130.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-191-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Notice of Termination of Market Participant Service
Agreement (No. 3360) of Southwest Power Pool, Inc. under ER20-191.
    Filed Date: 10/24/19.
    Accession Number: 20191024-5135.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-192-000.
    Applicants: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, New York Independent
System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: LGIA Niagara Mohawk and
Black River Hydroelectric (SA 2485) to be effective 9/30/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/25/19.
    Accession Number: 20191025-5023.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-193-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-10-25_SA 3366 Calhoun
Solar Energy-Consumers Energy FCA (J758) to be effective 10/11/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/25/19.
    Accession Number: 20191025-5024.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-194-000.
    Applicants: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, New York Independent
System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amended/Restated IA SA 2472
NYISO, NMPC, HQUS re: Cedar Rapids TIP to be effective 10/16/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/25/19.
    Accession Number: 20191025-5026.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-195-000.
    Applicants: Diamond Leaf Energy, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market Based
Rate to be effective 12/23/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/25/19.
    Accession Number: 20191025-5028.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-196-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-10-25_SA 3365 METC-
Calhoun Solar Energy GIA (J758) to be effective 10/11/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/25/19.
    Accession Number: 20191025-5030.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-197-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Rate Schedule No. 95 Notice of
Termination to be effective 12/23/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/25/19.
    Accession Number: 20191025-5071.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-198-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Rate Schedule No. 156 Notice of
Termination to be effective 12/23/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/25/19.
    Accession Number: 20191025-5105.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-199-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Rate Schedule No. 157 Notice of
Termination to be effective 12/23/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/25/19.
    Accession Number: 20191025-5113.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-200-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Rate Schedule 165
Concurrence to APS to be effective 12/23/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/25/19.
    Accession Number: 20191025-5129.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-201-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Rate Schedule No. 166
Concurrence to APS to be effective 12/23/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/25/19.
    Accession Number: 20191025-5143.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-202-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Rate Schedule No. 167
Concurrence to APS to be effective 12/23/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/25/19.
    Accession Number: 20191025-5152.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-203-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 205: Reliability
Coordination Agreement between NYISO and Alcoa to be effective 10/25/
2019.
    Filed Date: 10/25/19.
    Accession Number: 20191025-5153.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/19.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following public
utility holding company filings:

    Docket Numbers: PH20-1-000.
    Applicants: [Eacute]nergir Inc.
    Description: [Eacute]nergir Inc. submits FERC 65-B Waiver
Notification.
    Filed Date: 10/25/19.
    Accession Number: 20191025-5147.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/19.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 25, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-23839 Filed 10-31-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 112 (Wednesday, June 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33575-33576]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13547]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[USCG-2014-0265]

Information Collection Request to Office of Management and Budget

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Sixty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request
(ICRs) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting approval of an
extension to the following collection of information: 1625-0106,
Unauthorized Entry into Cuban Territorial Waters. Our ICR describes the
information we seek to collect from the public. Before submitting this
ICR to OIRA, the Coast Guard is inviting comments as described below.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before August 11,
2014.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG-2014-0265] to the Docket Management Facility (DMF) at the
U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). To avoid duplicate
submissions, please use only one of the following means:
    (1) Online: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Mail: DMF (M-30), DOT, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (3) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. To ensure your comments are received in a
timely manner, mark the fax, to attention Desk Officer for the Coast
Guard.
    The DMF maintains the public docket for this Notice. Comments and
material received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in
this Notice as being available in the docket, will become part of the
docket and will be available for inspection or copying at Room W12-140
on the West Building Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also find the docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Copies of the ICR(s) are available through the docket on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are
available from: COMMANDANT (CG-612), ATTN: PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
MANAGER, US COAST GUARD, 2703 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AVE SE STOP 7710,
WASHINGTON DC 20593-7710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Anthony Smith, Office of
Information Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for questions on these documents. Contact Ms. Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations,<PHONE_NUMBER>, for questions on the docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This Notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an application to
OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a Coast Guard
collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains information
describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's likely burden on
the affected public, an explanation of the necessity of the Collection,
and other important information describing the Collection. There is one
ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether these ICRs should be
granted based on the Collections being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the
Collections; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the
Collections; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
information subject to the Collections; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the Collections on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology. In response to your comments, we may revise these

ICRs or decide not to seek approval of revisions of the Collections. We
will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. Comments must contain the OMB Control Number of
the ICR and the docket number of this request, [USCG-2014-0265], and
must be received by August 11, 2014. We will post all comments
received, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov. They will
include any personal information you provide. We have an agreement with
DOT to use their DMF. Please see the ``Privacy Act'' paragraph below.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number [USCG-
2014-0265], indicate the specific section of the document to which each
comment applies, providing a reason for each comment. You may submit
your comments and material online (via http://www.regulations.gov), by
fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only one of these means. If
you submit a comment online via www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit
the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is
received at the DMF. We recommend you include your name, mailing
address, an email address, or other contact information in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
    You may submit your comments and material by electronic means,
mail, fax, or delivery to the DMF at the address under ADDRESSES; but
please submit them by only one means. To submit your comment online, go
to http://www.regulations.gov, and type ``USCG-2014-0265'' in the
``Search'' box. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by
mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and will address them accordingly.
    Viewing comments and documents: To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this Notice as being available in the docket, go
to http://www.regulations.gov, click on the ``read comments'' box,
which will then become highlighted in blue. In the ``Search'' box
insert ``USCG-2014-0265'' and click ``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket
Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column. You may also visit the DMF in Room
W12-140 on the ground floor of the DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received in
dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act statement
regarding Coast Guard public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of
the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Information Collection Request

    1. Title: Unauthorized Entry into Cuban Territorial Waters.
    Omb Control Number: 1625-0106.
    Summary: The Coast Guard, pursuant to Presidential proclamation and
order of the Secretary of Homeland Security, is requiring U.S. vessels,
and vessels without nationality, less than 100 meters, located within
the internal waters or the 12 nautical mile territorial sea of the
United States, that thereafter enter Cuban territorial waters, to apply
for and receive a Coast Guard permit.
    Need: The information is collected to regulate departure from U.S.
territorial waters of U.S. vessels, and vessels without nationality,
and entry thereafter into Cuban territorial waters. The need to
regulate this vessel traffic supports ongoing efforts to enforce the
Cuban embargo, which is designed to bring about an end to the current
government and peaceful transition to democracy. Accordingly, only
applicants that demonstrate prior U.S. government approval for exports
to and transactions with Cuba will be issued a Coast Guard permit.
    The permit regulation requires that applicants hold United States
Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) and U.S.
Department of Treasury the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
licenses that permit exports to and transactions with Cuba. The USCG
permit process thus allows the agency to collect information from
applicants about their status vis-[agrave]-vis BIS and OFAC licenses
and monitor compliance with BIS and OFAC regulations. These two
agencies administer statutes and regulations that proscribe exports
(BIS) and transactions with (OFAC) Cuba. Accordingly, in order to
assist BIS and OFAC in the enforcement of these license requirements,
as directed by the President and the Secretary of Homeland Security,
the Coast Guard is requiring certain U.S. vessels, and vessels without
nationality, to demonstrate that they hold these licenses before they
depart for Cuban waters.
    Forms: CG-3300.
    Respondents: Owners and operators of vessels.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Burden Estimate: The estimated burden remains unchanged at 1 hour
per year.

    Authority:  The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended.

    Dated: June 3, 2014.
Marshall B. Lytle,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Command,
Control, Communications, Computers and Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2014-13547 Filed 6-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47060-47061]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19277]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL12-97-000]

Indiana Municipal Power Agency; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on July 30, 2012, Indiana Municipal Power Agency
filed a Proposed Revenue Requirement for reactive supply service under
Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. Tariff Schedule
2.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).

Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must
file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate.
Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the
comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to
serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the
Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 20, 2012.

    Dated: July 31, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-19277 Filed 8-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Shreveport Bossier City Metropolitan Statistical Area Early Action Compact Progress Report June 30, 2004 Prepared for U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 6 Dallas, Texas Shreveport Bossier City MSA Early Action Compact Progress Report i Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Development of Control Strategies/ Early Action Plans ................................................... 1 3. Progress Toward Implementation of Local Measures ...................................................... 2 4. Progress Toward Completion of Additional Technical Analyses .................................. 2 5. Meetings ................................................................................................................................... 3 6. Progress of State SIP Development ........................................................................................ 3 7. Obstacles .                                     3 Shreveport Bossier City MSA Early Action Compact Progress Report

1 1. Introduction The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) requires signatories of Early Action Compacts ( EAC) to prepare a progress report every six months that describes the progress made to date against the EAC milestones. This progress report will summarize activities related to the Shreveport   Bossier City Metropolitan Statistical Area's EAC during the period from January 1 through June 30, 2004.

2. Development of Control Strategies/ Early Action Plans The first quarter of 2004 was spent finalizing the Air Quality Improvement Plan ( AQIP) for submission by the Shreveport   Bossier City MSA ( the MSA) to the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality ( DEQ) . During this period, final control measure and 2012 maintenance modeling analyses were completed, and the primary planning strategies for ensuring continued attainment through 2007 were refined and finalized The strategies included ( a) selection of six control measures for implementation by the end of 2005 at the latest, and ( b) formulation of a contingency plan, which would require the MSA to take specified actions in the event that ozone design values increase to the non attainment threshold. The particular control measures, as well as the contingency plan, are set out in detail in the AQIP submitted on March 31.

The Greater Shreveport Clean Air Citizens Advisory Committee ( CACAC), which is the primary air quality planning entity for the MSA, considered these strategies via emails and telephone conferences during the week of January 19, and agreed with the proposed approach. With regard to the " contingency" provision, it was noted that the AQIP should not list specific control measures to be implemented in the event of a contingency, because the particular circumstances which could give rise to a higher design value in the future will clearly have a significant bearing on the types of strategies selected, and those circumstances are obviously unknown at present. Instead, the CACAC determined that the AQIP's contingency plan should contain a schedule for the selection of appropriate strategies, should such a need arise, based on the particular circumstances of the contingency.

Also during this period, emissions reduction estimates expected to result from the implementation of four of the six listed initial control strategies were refined and finalized, to the greatest extent possible. Exact emissions reduction estimates were unable to be established for two of the control strategies ( piping of landfill gas to the General Motors plant and the installation of energy conservation equipment in city buildings). However, the MSA began partnering with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, EPA, DEQ, Louisiana State University, and AEP SWEPCO ( the local electric utility) on an innovative program to calculate emission reduction credits resulting from the City of Shreveport's energy efficiency initiative. It is hoped that this program, once established, can be utilized as a tool for air planning purposes throughout the country. As of the date of this progress report, work on the program is continuing. Shreveport Bossier City MSA Early Action Compact Progress Report

2 The public was notified of the scope of the proposed AQIP via newspaper publication on February 24. Initially, an abstract summarizing the salient points of the proposed AQIP was posted on the City of Shreveport's web site, and the plan itself, along with the modeling report, was posted in March and remains posted on the City's website.

On March 9, the CACAC met for the last time prior to the March 31 submission, and received a final briefing from the modelers on their results. The plan was then put into final form, circulated to and approved by CACAC members, and submitted to DEQ by March 31.

3. Progress Toward Implementation of Local Measures ( a) Centerpoint Energy Plant Modification. Construction on this project has begun, and completion of the project ( and the corresponding NOx reduction) is currently slated for September of 2004. Completion could be delayed somewhat if the adverse weather conditions experienced this spring and summer continue to impede progress.

( b) General Motors Plant Modification. This project has been fully implemented.

( c) Landfill Gas Recovery Project. This project has been fully implemented.

( d) Energy Conservation Program. The City signed the contract with Johnson Controls for the installation of energy conservation equipment on March 19, and work has begun. As mentioned above, a collaborative project between numerous state, federal and local agencies is ongoing, to quantify the emissions reduction benefits to be expected from this program. Currently, monthly demand and consumption profiles for both electricity and natural gas showing the reductions attributable to the project are being developed by Johnson Controls.

( e) Intelligent Transportation Systems. The system has been installed at 24 intersections.

( f) Hybrid Bus. In May, the Shreveport City Council approved the budget for the purchase of the bus. The bus is expected to be delivered within 12 months.

4. Progress Toward Completion of Additional Technical Analyses No additional technical analyses are needed in this regard, as all modeling completed prior to the March 31 submission supports continued attainment. Any additional emissions reductions benefits from the landfill gas project and the energy efficiency program which can be quantified may be modeled and factored into the technical Shreveport Bossier City MSA Early Action Compact Progress Report

3 analyses if feasible; however, such is not necessary in order to support the attainment demonstration.

5. Meetings As discussed above, the CACAC held its last meeting prior to submission of the AQIP on March 9. The meeting was advertised in the local newspaper and the public was invited. At the meeting, the final modeling presentation was given and final results and conclusions were presented. Shortly thereafter, and after a public comment period concluded, the CACAC approved the AQIP for submission to DEQ.

6. Progress of State SIP Development The following is the expected SIP processing schedule as of June 29, 2004, furnished by the DEQ:

SIP Noticed in Louisiana Register 8/ 20/ 04 SIP Public Hearing 10/ 7/ 04 SIP Comment Period 8/ 20   10/ 14/ 04 Response to SIP Comments 10/ 14   11/ 14/ 04 Submittal of Final SIP to EPA Mid December ` 04 7. Obstacles We are aware of no obstacles at this time toward completion of the December 31 milestone or any future milestones.


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 125 (Monday, June 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38958-38960]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13870]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-89126; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2020-050]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the Content of the Cboe One Feed Under Rule 11.22(j) to Identify the
Primary Listing Market's Official Opening and Closing Price

June 23, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on June 10, 2020, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BZX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'' or the ``Exchange'') is filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') a
proposed rule change to amend the content of the Cboe One Feed under
Rule 11.22(j) to identify the primary listing market's official opening
and closing price. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the content of the Cboe One Feed
under Rule 11.22(j) to identify the primary listing market's official
opening and closing price. Additionally, the Exchange proposes to amend
Rules 11.22(i) and (j) to make an administerial change so that the
Rules reference Cboe rather than Bats.
    The Cboe One Feed is a data feed that disseminates, on a real-time
basis, the aggregate best bid and offer (``BBO'') of all displayed
orders for securities traded on BZX and its affiliated exchanges.\5\
Among other things, the Cboe One Feed also includes consolidated volume
for all listed equity securities regardless of where the transaction
was executed and the Cboe One Opening Price and the Cboe One Closing
Price.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ BZX's affiliated exchanges are the Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc.
(``BYX''), Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (``EDGA''), and Cboe EDGX
Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX'', and together with BZX, BYX, and EDGA, the
``Cboe Equity Exchanges''). See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
73918 (December 23, 2014), 79 FR 78920 (December 31, 2014) (File
Nos. SR-EDGX-2014-25; SR-EDGA-2014-25; SR-BATS-2014-055; SR-BYX-
2014-030) (Notice of Amendments No. 2 and Order Granting Accelerated
Approval to Proposed Rule Changes, as Modified by Amendments Nos. 1
and 2, to Establish a New Market Data Product called the Cboe
(formerly Bats) One Feed) (``Cboe One Approval Order'').
    \6\ For securities listed on Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX''),
the Cboe One Opening Price shall be the BZX Official Opening Price
as defined in BZX Rule 11.23(a)(5) and the Cboe One Closing Price
shall be the BZX Official Closing Price as defined in BZX Rule
11.23(a)(3). For securities not listed on BZX, the Cboe One Opening
Price shall be the first last sale eligible trade that occurred on
the Exchange or any of its affiliates after 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time,
and the Cboe One Closing Price shall be the final last sale eligible
trade to occur on the Exchange or any of its affiliates prior to
4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. See Exchange Rule 11.22(j).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Now, in addition to the information currently provided in the Cboe
One Feed, the Exchange is proposing to include the primary listing
market's official opening and closing price for all listed equity
securities as obtained directly from the securities information
processors. Such information would supplement the existing consolidated
volume and Cboe One Opening/Closing Price information included in the
Cboe One Feed by providing additional consolidated trade information.
The official opening and closing price for all listed equity securities
would be disseminated via the Cboe One Feed after the Consolidated Tape
Association (``CTA'') and Unlisted Trading Privileges (``UTP'') Plan
Securities Information Processor (``SIP'') delay period, which is
currently 15 minutes.
    Additionally, the Exchange proposes to amend Rules 11.22(i) and (j)
to eliminate any reference to Bats and replace such references with
Cboe.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\7\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule changes are consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \8\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange
also believes that the proposed rule changes are consistent with
Section 11(A) of the Act \9\ in that it supports (1) fair competition
among brokers and dealers, among exchange markets, and between exchange
markets and markets other than exchange markets and (2) the
availability to brokers, dealers, and investors of information with
respect to quotations for and transactions in securities. Furthermore,
the proposed rule changes are consistent with Rule 603 of Regulation
NMS,\10\ which provides that any national securities exchange that
distributes information with respect to quotations for or transactions
in an NMS stock do so on terms that are not unreasonably
discriminatory. In adopting Regulation NMS, the Commission granted
self-regulatory organizations and broker-dealers increased authority
and flexibility to offer new and unique market data products to the
public. It was believed that this authority would expand the amount of
data available to consumers, and also spur innovation and competition
for the provision of market data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1.
    \10\ See 17 CFR 242.603.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed change to Exchange Rule 11.22(j) is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade and remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system by identifying the primary listing market's official
opening and closing price. Significant volumes typically occur in the
primary listing market auctions, and the prices derived from those
auctions are used as a reference price for various other instruments,
including options and exchange-traded products. Therefore, official
opening and closing price information would provide meaningful
information to investors. The Exchange also believes this proposal is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act because it protects
investors and the public interest and promotes just and equitable
principles of trade by providing investors with new options for
receiving such information. The Exchange also notes that the primary
listing market's official opening and closing price is currently
included in a competing market data products offered by the New York
Stock Exchange (``NYSE'').\11\ Therefore, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, protects investors and the public interest as it would provide
an additional avenue for investors to receive this information from a
competing product. The proposal would not permit unfair discrimination
because the primary listing market's official opening and closing price
will be available to all of the Exchange's customers and market data
vendors on an equivalent basis. In addition, any customer that wishes
to receive this information via a different source will be able to do
so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Specifically, the NYSE BQT (Best Quote and Trade)
proprietary feed includes the primary listing market's official
opening and closing price. See https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/data/NYSE_BQT_Client_Specification_v2.3a.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed administerial amendments to Exchange Rules 11.22(i)
and (j) are designed remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of
a free and open market by accurately referencing Cboe rather than Bats.
Further, a consistent reference to Cboe rather than Bats will help
avoid potential investor confusion.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed change to Rule
11.22(j) will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, the
Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will enhance
competition because it would enable the Exchange to include primary
listing market's official opening and closing price as part of the Cboe
One Feed, thereby enabling it to better compete with similar market
data products currently offered by NYSE that include such
information.\12\ The Exchange is not the exclusive distributor of the
primary listing market's official opening and closing price, and a
vendor seeking to offer a similar product that includes this
information would be able to do so on the same terms as the Exchange.
Specifically, a competing vendor could receive the primary listing
market's official opening and closing price from the securities
information processors and include that information as part of their
market data products to be disseminated to customers pursuant to the
same terms and policies as the Exchange.\13\ Therefore, the Exchange
believes the inclusion of the primary listing market's official opening
and closing price in the Cboe One Feed would not impose any burden on
competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes
of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Id.
    \13\ See CTA Consolidated Volume Display Policy with FAQ, supra
note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange does not believe the proposed administerial changes to
Exchange Rules 11.22(i) and (j) will have any impact on competition as
it is merely designed to consistently and accurately refer to Cboe
rather than Bats.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \14\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CboeBZX-2020-050 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2020-050. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2020-050, and should be
submitted on or before July 20, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-13870 Filed 6-26-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Approach B: All commercial laboratories currently using the old Pensky-Martens test method (1010A) would continue to use that method. All commercial laboratories currently using the old Setaflash test method (1020B) would adopt the new Setaflash method (1020C). This approach represents the upper-bound estimate of cost impacts, because it assumes that commercial laboratories that continue to use the old Pensky-Martens test method would not realize cost savings from reduced labor time associated with the use of an automated apparatus.
These two alternative approaches only affect EPA's estimates of costs associated with proposed changes to ignitability test methods. This appendix therefore does not provide updated estimates of the costs of proposed changes to mercury thermometer test methods.
EXHIBIT A-1 SUMMARIZES TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS BY LABORATORY TYPE FOR EACH OF THESE TWO ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES. Net cost impacts of the proposed changes to ignitability test methods under these two alternative approaches are presented in Exhibits A-2 and A-3. As the exhibits show, both Approach A and Approach B result in sizable net cost savings, though Approach A produces an estimate of cost savings that is greater than the savings reported in Chapter 3, while Approach B produces an estimate of cost savings smaller than the savings reported in Chapter 3.
Exhibit A-1.	Proposed Rule Ignitability Cost Results under alternative approaches a and b (year 2016$)
Laboratory type
Total One-Time Costs
Total Annual Costs

                                 Low Estimate
                                 High Estimate
Commercial (Approach A)
                                                                       $614,000
                                                                       $161,000
                                                                     $1,040,000
Commercial (Approach B)
                                                                        $53,800
                                                                       $261,000
                                                                     $1,690,000
EPA
                                                                        $67,100
                                                                         $3,420
                                                                        $18,000
State
                                                                       $149,000
                                                                         $5,210
                                                                        $36,900
Total (Approach A)
                                                                       $830,000
                                                                       $170,000
                                                                     $1,100,000
Total (Approach B)
                                                                       $270,000
                                                                       $269,000
                                                                     $1,740,000

Exhibit a-2.	Net Present Value Cost Impacts of the Proposed changes to ignitability test methods over 20 years under alternative approaches a and b (year 2016$)
Laboratory type
3% Discount Rate
7% Discount Rate
Commercial (Approach A)
                         ($11,000,000) -  ($2,100,000)
                         ($7,650,000)  -  ($1,320,000)
Commercial (Approach B)
                           ($934,000)  -  ($180,000)
                           ($650,000)  -  ($112,000)
EPA
                            ($116,000)  -  ($4,460)
                              ($63,200) - $16,100
State
                              ($235,000) - $8,410
                             ($124,000) - $48,900
Total (Approach A)
                        ($11,300,000)  -  ($2,100,000)
                         ($7,840,000)  -  ($1,260,000)
Total (Approach B)
                          ($1,280,000)  -  ($176,000)
                            ($837,000) - ($47,400)

Exhibit a-3.	Annualized Cost Impacts of the Proposed changes to ignitability test methods under alternative approaches a and b (year 2016$)
Laboratory type
3% Discount Rate
7% Discount Rate
Commercial (Approach A)
                           ($739,000) -  ($141,000)
                           ($723,000)  -  ($125,000)
Commercial (Approach B)
                            ($62,800)  -  ($12,100)
                            ($61,300)  -  ($10,600)
EPA
                              ($7,790)  -  ($300)
                               ($5,970) - $1,520
State
                               ($15,800) - $565
                              ($11,700) - $4,620
Total (Approach A)
                           ($763,000)  -  ($141,000)
                           ($740,000)  -  ($118,000)
Total (Approach B)
                            ($86,400)  -  ($11,800)
                             ($79,000) - ($4,470)


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 73 (Tuesday, April 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18328-18329]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07867]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a closed meeting on Thursday, April
20, 2017 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(7), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit
consideration of the scheduled matter at the closed meeting.
    Acting Chairman Piwowar, as duty officer, voted to consider the
items listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims;
    Litigation matters; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed; please

contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-
5400.

    Dated: April 13, 2017.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-07867 Filed 4-14-17; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 943]
[FR Doc No: 2016-173]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2013-0006]

Tribal Declarations Pilot Guidance

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is accepting
comments on the Tribal Declarations Pilot Guidance.

DATES: Comments must be received by April 7, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Comments must be identified by docket ID FEMA-2013-0006 and
may be submitted by one of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. Please note that this proposed
policy is not a rulemaking and the Federal Rulemaking Portal is being
utilized only as a mechanism for receiving comments.
    Mail: Regulatory Affairs Division, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 8NE, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC
20472-3100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Specht, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, 202-212-
2288.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Public Participation

    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket ID. Regardless of the method used for submitting comments or
material, all submissions will be posted, without change, to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov, and will
include any personal information you provide. Therefore, submitting
this information makes it public. You may wish to read the Privacy Act
notice, which can be viewed by clicking on the ``Privacy Notice'' link
in the footer of www.regulations.gov.
    You may submit your comments and material by the methods specified
in the ADDRESSES section. Please submit your comments and any
supporting material by only one means to avoid the receipt and review
of duplicate submissions.
    Docket: The proposed guidance is available in docket ID FEMA-2013-
0006. For access to the docket to read background documents or comments
received, go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov and search for the docket ID. Submitted comments
may also be inspected at FEMA, Office of Chief Counsel, 8NE, 500 C
Street SW., Washington, DC 20472.

II. Background

    The Sandy Recovery Improvement Act of 2013 amended the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended, 42
U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (Stafford Act), to provide federally-recognized
Indian Tribal governments the option to request a Presidential
emergency or major disaster declaration.\1\ FEMA is proposing to
establish a pilot program to manage declaration requests from Indian
Tribal governments, and is seeking comment on its proposed Tribal
Declarations Pilot Guidance to implement such a program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Public Law 113-2, Sec.  1110.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed guidance does not have the force or effect of law.
    FEMA seeks comment on the proposed guidance, which is available
online at http://www.regulations.gov in docket ID FEMA-2013-0006. Based
on the comments received, FEMA may make appropriate revisions to the
proposed guidance. Although FEMA will consider any comments received in
the drafting of the final policy, FEMA will not provide a response to
comments document. When or if FEMA issues a final policy, FEMA will
publish a notice of availability in the Federal Register and make the
final guidance available at http://www.regulations.gov. The final
guidance will not have the force or effect of law.

    Authority: Pub. L. 113-2.

    Dated: December 30, 2015.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2016-173 Filed 1-7-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


Methyl Bromide Readers Guide Page 1 of 6 Reader's Guide to Methyl Bromide E Docket # OPP 2005 0123 ( Phase 5 for Methyl Bromide's Uses in Enclosures, Chambers, and Structural Food Processing/ Storage Facilities)

EPA has created this document to provide an organizational structure to the methyl bromide ( MeBr) e Docket. The docket index organizes and explains related documents. The docket index organizes and explains related documents. The Agency is providing the Reader's Guide to allow the reader to more easily access and navigate the various items contained in the MeBr e docket.

Federal Register and Docket Organizational Documents Docket Item # 1 Federal Register Notice: Methyl Bromide Revised Risk Assessment Methyl Bromide's Uses in Enclosures, Chambers, and Structural Food Processing/ Storage Facilities, Notice of Availability, and Solicitation of Risk Reduction Options This notice announces that the risk assessments are available for public review and comment.

Docket Item # 2 Reader's Guide to Methyl Bromide E Docket # OPP 2005 00123 The reader's guide is designed to give a brief description of all the documents in the MeBr e Docket.

Special Review and Reregistration Division ( SRRD) Documents Docket Item # 3 Risk Mitigation Options for Methyl Bromide's Uses in Enclosures, Chambers, and Structural Food Processing/ Storage Facilities ( March 20, 2006)

Contains the Agency's paper soliciting for comments on risk mitigation options for methyl bromide's uses in enclosures, chambers, and structural food processing/ storage facilities.

Docket Item # 4 Agency Responses to Phase 3 Public Comments Related to Methyl Bromide's Uses in Enclosures, Chambers, and Structural Food Processing/ Storage Facilities ( March 21, 2006)

Contains the Agency's response to Phase 3 public comments on methyl bromide's uses in enclosures, chambers, and structural food processing/ storage facilities.

Health Effects Division ( HED) Documents Docket Item # 5 Methyl Bromide: Phase 5 Health Effects Division ( HED) Human Health Methyl Bromide Readers Guide Page 2 of 6 Risk Assessment For Commodity Uses. PC Code: 053201, DP Barcode: D304623 ( March 10, 2006)

This document describes all the human health risk from the methyl bromide's uses in enclosures, chambers, and structural food processing/ storage facilities. Docket items # 6 through # 32 contain the appendices for this document.

Docket Item # 6 D304623. AppendicesA& B. hazard. wpd ( March 10, 2006)

Contains Appendix A ( Toxicity Profile) and Appendix B ( Hazard Assessment Array)

Docket Item # 7 D304623. AppendixC. Bibliography. wpd ( March 10, 2006)

Contains Appendix C ( Bibliography of MeBr Exposure Data)

Docket Item # 8 D304623. AppendixD1. SummaryDataCommodity. 123 ( March 10, 2006)

Contains Appendix D1 ( Summary Data sheets For Commodity Events)

Docket Item # 9 D304623. AppendixD2. SummaryDataIndustrial. 123 ( March 10, 2006)

Contains Appendix D2 ( Summary Data sheets For Industrial Fumigation Events)

Docket Item # 10 D304623. AppendixE. MonitoringDataAnalysis. WK4 ( March 10, 2006)

Contains Appendix E ( Analysis Of Monitoring Data For Commodity & Industrial Facility Fumigations)

Docket Item # 11 Appendix F1. Ventura. F301Hr1lbMS05. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F1 ( a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 1 hour emission, an application rate of 1 lb/ 1000 ft3, minimum stack height results, and an air exchange rate of 0.05 times/ minute.)

Docket Item # 12 Appendix F1. Ventura. F301Hr1lbMSFullEV. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F1 ( a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 1 hour emission, an application rate of 1 lb/ 1000 ft3, minimum stack height results, and an air exchange rate based on full exit velocity of 1 time/ minute.)

Docket Item # 13 Appendix F1. Ventura. F301Hr1lbNS. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F1 [ a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 1 hour emission, an application rate of 1 lb/ 1000 ft3, and results for no stack ( i. e., opening a door).]

Docket Item # 14 Appendix F1. Ventura. F301Hr1lbPortFullEV. xls ( March 10, 2006) Methyl Bromide Readers Guide Page 3 of 6 Contains part of Appendix F1 ( a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 1 hour emission, an application rate of 1 lb/ 1000 ft3, portable stack results, and an air exchange rate based on a full exit velocity of 1 time/ minute.)

Docket Item # 15 Appendix F1. Ventura. F301Hr1lbPPQFullEV. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F1 ( a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 1 hour emission, an application rate of 1 lb/ 1000 ft3, PPQ type emissions ( i. e., a tube lying on its side in a secured flat area), and an air exchange rate based on a full exit velocity of 1 time/ minute.)

Docket Item # 16 Appendix F2. Ventura. F301Hr4lbMS05. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F1 ( a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 1 hour emission, an application rate of 4 lb/ 1000 ft3, minimum stack height results, and an air exchange rate of 0.05 times/ minute.)

Docket Item # 17 Appendix F2. Ventura. F301Hr4lbMSFullEV. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F2 ( a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 1 hour emission, an application rate of 4 lb/ 1000 ft3, minimum stack height results, and an air exchange rate based on full exit velocity of 1 time/ minute.)

Docket Item # 18 Appendix F2. Ventura. F301Hr4lbNS. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F2 [ a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 1 hour emission, an application rate of 4 lb/ 1000 ft3, and results for no stack ( i. e., opening a door).]

Docket Item # 19 Appendix F2. Ventura. F301Hr4lbPortFullEV. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F2 ( a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 1 hour emission, an application rate of 4 lb/ 1000 ft3, portable stack results, and an air exchange rate based on a full exit velocity of 1 time/ minute.)

Docket Item # 20 Appendix F2. Ventura. F301Hr4lbPPQFullEV. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F2 ( a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 1 hour emission, an application rate of 4 lb/ 1000 ft3, PPQ type emissions ( i. e., a tube lying on its side in a secured flat area), and an air exchange rate based on a full exit velocity of 1 time/ minute.)

Docket Item # 21 Appendix F3. Ventura. F304Hr1lbMS05. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F3 a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an Methyl Bromide Readers Guide Page 4 of 6 uncertainty factor = 30, 4 hour emission, an application rate of 1 lb/ 1000 ft3, minimum stack height results, and an air exchange rate of 0.05 times/ minute.

Docket Item # 22 Appendix F3. Ventura. F304Hr1lbMSFullEV. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F3 ( a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 4 hour emission, an application rate of 1 lb/ 1000 ft3, minimum stack height results, and an air exchange rate based on full exit velocity of 1 time/ minute.)

Docket Item # 23 Appendix F3. Ventura. F304Hr1lbNS. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F3 [ a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 4 hour emission, an application rate of 1 lb/ 1000 ft3, and results for no stack ( i. e., opening a door).]

Docket Item # 24 Appendix F3. Ventura. F304Hr1lbPortFullEV. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F3 ( a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 4 hour emission, an application rate of 1 lb/ 1000 ft3, portable stack results, and an air exchange rate based on a full exit velocity of 1 time/ minute.)

Docket Item # 25 Appendix F3. Ventura. F304Hr1lbPPQFullEV. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F3 ( a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 4 hour emission, an application rate of 1 lb/ 1000 ft3, PPQ type emissions ( i. e., a tube lying on its side in a secured flat area), and an air exchange rate based on a full exit velocity of 1 time/ minute.)

Docket Item # 26 Appendix F4. Ventura. F304Hr4lbMS05. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F4 ( a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 4 hour emission, an application rate of 4 lb/ 1000 ft3, minimum stack height results, and an air exchange rate of 0.05 times/ minute.)

Docket Item # 27 Appendix F4. Ventura. F304Hr4lbMSFullEV. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F4 ( a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 4 hour emission, an application rate of 4 lb/ 1000 ft3, minimum stack height results, and an air exchange rate based on full exit velocity of 1 time/ minute.)

Docket Item # 28 Appendix F4. Ventura. F304Hr4lbNS. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F4 [ a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 4 hour emission, an application rate of 4 lb/ 1000 ft3, and results for no stack ( i. e., opening a door).]

Docket Item # 29 Appendix F4. Ventura. F304Hr4lbPortFullEV. xls ( March 10, 2006) Methyl Bromide Readers Guide Page 5 of 6 Contains part of Appendix F4 ( a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 4 hour emission, an application rate of 4 lb/ 1000 ft3, portable stack results, and an air exchange rate based on a full exit velocity of 1 time/ minute.)

Docket Item # 30 Appendix F4. Ventura. F304Hr4lbPPQFullEV. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains part of Appendix F3 ( a summary of the results using Ventura CA weather data, an uncertainty factor = 30, 4 hour emission, an application rate of 4 lb/ 1000 ft3, PPQ type emissions ( i. e., a tube lying on its side in a secured flat area), and an air exchange rate based on a full exit velocity of 1 time/ minute.)

Docket Item # 31 AppendixF5. Analysis. xls ( March 10, 2006)

Contains Appendix F5 ( a summary of the 2000 PERFUM results. Note: This appendix also contains a summary table that provides risk calculations based on the data where the target uncertainty factor of 30 has been altered to illustrate how risks change with varying distances.)

Docket Item # 32 D304623. AppendixG. SummaryDataAmbient. 123 ( March 10, 2006)

Contains Appendix G ( Summary Data sheets For Ambient Monitoring Data)

Docket Item # 33 Methyl Bromide: Revised Acute and Chronic Dietary Exposure Assessments for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision. PC Code: 053201, DP Barcode: D304603 Contains a revision of the Methyl Bromide: Revised Acute and Chronic Dietary Exposure Assessments for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision dated September 30, 2004 ( F. Fort)

Office of Atmospheric Programs ( OAP) Documents Docket Item # 34 Methyl Bromide: Science of Ozone Depletion and Health Effects Estimates ( March 17, 2006)

Contains OAP's assessment of the number of UV related skin cancer incidence and deaths from methyl bromide uses due to ozone depletion. Docket items # 35 through # 38 contain support documents for this assessment that were provided by OAP.

Docket Item # 35 Human Health Benefits Of Stratospheric Ozone Protection ( December 18, 2003):

This document supports OAP's March 17, 2006 assessment Docket Item # 36 Regulatory Impact Analysis, Protecting Stratospheric Ozone: Process for Exempting Critical Uses from the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide ( no date)

This document supports OAP's March 17, 2006 assessment Methyl Bromide Readers Guide Page 6 of 6 Docket Item # 37 OAP's Economic Impact Analysis For Methyl Bromide Allocation In The United States ( December 2, 2003)

This document supports OAP's March 17, 2006 assessment Docket Item # 38 OAP's Benefits Analysis ( no date)

This document supports OAP's March 17, 2006 assessment Biological and Economic Analysis Division ( BEAD) Documents Docket Item # 39 Methyl Bromide Tolerance and Non Tolerance Usage Estimate Contains BEAD's estimates of MeBr tolerance and non tolerance uses


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 155 (Monday, August 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55036-55037]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17314]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-ORD-2013-0292; FRL-11270-01-ORD]

Public Comment on the Cumulative Risk Assessment Guidelines for
Planning and Problem Formulation; Extension of the Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of public comment period; extension.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing
an extension of the public comment period by 15 days for the draft
Cumulative Risk Assessment Guidelines for Planning and Problem
Formulation. The original Federal Register document announcing the
public comment period was published on June 16, 2023.

DATES: The public comment period for the notice published on June 16,
2023 (88 FR 39424) is being extended by 15 days. The EPA must receive
comments on or before August 30, 2023, to be considered.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
ORD-2013-0292, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov/
(our preferred method). Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket
Center, Office of Research and Development Docket, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: EPA Docket Center, WJC West
Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004.
The Docket Center's hours of operations are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday (except Federal Holidays).
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this notice. Comments received may be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal information
provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and additional
information on the public comment process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on the public comment
period, contact the ORD Docket at the EPA Headquarters Docket Center;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>; or email:
[email protected]. For technical information on the draft guidelines
or information on the public comment period, contact Dr. Lawrence
Martin, via email at: [email protected]; or via phone/voicemail
at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA published the CRA Guidelines for
Planning and Problem Formulation on June 16, 2023, in the Federal
Register (88 FR 39424), which included a request for public comments on
or before August 15, 2023, on the draft CRA guidelines document
(available in the docket). The purpose of this notice is to extend the
public comment period.
    The public can submit comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
ORD-2013-0292, at https://www.regulations.gov/ or the other methods
identified in the ADDRESSES section.

I. How To Submit Technical Comments to the Docket at https://
www.regulations.gov

    The public can submit comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
ORD-2013-0292 for the CRA Guidelines for Planning and Problem
Formulation, by one of the following methods:
     www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
     Email: [email protected].
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

     Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket
Center (EPA-HQ-ORD-2013-0292), Mail Code: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460. The phone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For
information on visiting the EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room,
visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading
Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Deliveries are only accepted during the docket's
normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. If you provide comments by mail or
hand delivery, please submit three copies of the comments. For
attachments, provide an index, number pages consecutively with the
comments, and submit an unbound original and three copies.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket number EPA-HQ-ORD-
2013-0292 for the CRA Guidelines for Planning and Problem Formulation.
If you are commenting on specific text in the document, please use the
page and line number to identify the text to which you refer. General
recommendations or comments are best tied to a specific section in the
text that comes closest to addressing the issue you are commenting
upon. If no such section exists, then a recommendation for a new
section heading is helpful. Please provide citations for any technical
information and/or data used to support the information you provide. To
ensure proper receipt by the EPA, be sure to identify the docket ID
number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page of
your response.
    Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the closing date will be marked
``late,'' and may only be considered if time permits. It is EPA's
policy to include all comments it receives in the public docket without
change and to make the comments available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless a comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information for which disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information through
www.regulations.gov or email that you consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected. The www.regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an email comment directly to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket visit the
EPA Docket Center homepage at www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the ORD Docket
in the EPA Headquarters Docket Center.

III. How will comments be used?

    Public comment received on the draft CRA Guidelines for Planning
and Problem Formulation will be reviewed and considered to be
incorporated into or modify text in the final revised draft of the
Guidelines. The final draft Guidelines will then undergo internal EPA
review and revision, and then be finalized for publication.

Mary Ross,
Director, Office of Science Advisor, Policy, and Engagement.
[FR Doc. 2023-17314 Filed 8-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 189 (Friday, September 28, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49028-49031]
[FR Doc No: 2018-21186]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0868]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Annual Fireworks Displays Within the Sector Columbia
River Captain of the Port Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to amend the regulations establishing
safety zones for annual fireworks displays in the Captain of the Port
Zone Columbia River. This action would include updating 3 existing
safety zones, adding 1 safety zone for a fireworks display that was
previously published under a temporary regulation, and removing 10
safety zones for inactive fireworks displays. We invite your comments
on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before October 29, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0868 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email LCDR Dixon Whitley, Waterways
Management Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, Coast Guard;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    Our regulation for safety zones for fireworks displays in Captain
of the Port Zone Columbia River, 33 CFR 165.1315, was revised (82 FR
28556, June 23, 2017) in 2017. This proposed rule would remove 10
safety zones for inactive fireworks displays, add 1 safety zone for a
new, recurring fireworks display that was previously published as a
temporary safety zone, and update the date or location for 3 existing
fireworks displays. The purpose of this revision would provide the
public accurate information regarding safety zones for annual fireworks
displays in Captain of the Port Zone Columbia River.
    The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33
U.S.C. 1231. The Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River has
determined that fireworks displays create hazardous conditions for the
maritime public because of the large number of vessels near the
displays, as well as the noise, falling debris, and explosions that
occur during the event. Because firework discharge sites pose a
potential hazard to the maritime public, these safety zones are
necessary in restricting vessel movement and to reduce vessel
congregation in the proximity of the firework discharge sites.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to remove 10 fireworks display safety
zones in 33 CFR 165.1315 that are listed in Table 1 below because the
Coast Guard has not received an application to conduct these fireworks
displays within the past 3 years.

                     Table 1--List of Safety Zone We Propose To Remove From 33 CFR 165.1315
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cinco de Mayo Fireworks.......  Portland, OR.....  One day in May...  45[deg]30'58'' N      122[deg]40'12'' W
Newport High School Graduation  Newport, OR......  One day in June..  44[deg]36'48'' N      124[deg]04'10'' W
 Fireworks.
Celebrate Milwaukie...........  Milwaukie, OR....  One day in July..  45[deg]26'33'' N      122[deg]38'44'' W
Arlington 4th of July.........  Arlington, OR....  One day in July..  45[deg]43'23'' N      120[deg]12'11'' W
East County 4th of July         Gresham, OR......  One day in July..  45[deg]33'32'' N      122[deg]27'10'' W
 Fireworks.
Rufus 4th of July Fireworks...  Rufus, OR........  One day in July..  45[deg]41'39'' N      120[deg]45'16'' W
Maritime Heritage Festival....  St. Helens, OR...  One day in July..  45[deg]51'54'' N      122[deg]47'26'' W
Lynch Picnic..................  West Linn, OR....  One day in July..  45[deg]23'37'' N      122[deg]37'52'' W
First Friday Milwaukie........  Milwaukie, OR....  One day in         45[deg]26'33'' N      122[deg]38'44'' W
                                                    September.
Willamette Falls Heritage       Oregon City, OR..  One day in         45[deg]21'44'' N      122[deg]36'21'' W
 Festival.                                          October.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the Coast Guard proposes to add a new fireworks
display safety zone. This safety zone was previously listed as a
temporary safety zone (83 FR 30869, July 2, 2018), and after conferring
with the event sponsor,

it will become a recurring fireworks display. This safety zone would
cover all navigable waters within a 450 yard radius of the fireworks
barge in the Willamette River located at 45[deg]24'37'' N,
122[deg]39'30'' W in the vicinity of George Rogers Park in Lake Oswego,
OR. The following would be added to the table in 33 CFR 165.1315:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Lake Oswego 4th of      Lake Oswego, OR..  One day in July..  45[deg]24'37'' N      122[deg]39'30'' W
 July Fireworks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Coast Guard proposes to revise three existing
fireworks display safety zones. These revisions include updating the
date for 4th of July at Pekin Ferry to more precisely describe when the
fireworks display would occur, correcting the wrong state listed for
the Independence Day at the Port and updating the location for the
Leukemia and Lymphoma Light the Night Fireworks.
    These updates would eliminate any confusion caused by the fireworks
display safety zones listed in the 33 CFR165.1315 table and any
subsequent temporary safety zones resulting from changes. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on size, location,
duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic would be
able to safely transit around these safety zones which would impact
small designated areas of the Oregon coast, Tillamook Bay, the Columbia
River and its tributaries, and the Clatskanie River for approximately 2
hours during the evening when commercial vessel traffic is normally
low. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule
would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, which guides the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves safety zones lasting approximately two hours in duration and
would prohibit entry within 450 yards of the launch sites. Normally
such

actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01,
Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration supporting
this determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. In Sec.  165.1315, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
    (a) Safety zones. The following areas are designated safety zones:
Waters of the Columbia River and its tributaries, waters of the Siuslaw
River, Yaquina River, Umpqua River, Clatskanie River, Tillamook Bay and
waters of the Washington and Oregon Coasts, within a 450 yard radius of
the launch site at the approximate locations listed in the following
table:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Event name (typically)        Event location     Date of event          Latitude              Longitude
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Portland Rose Festival          Portland, OR.....  One day in May or  45[deg]30'58'' N      122[deg]40'12'' W
 Fireworks.                                         June.
Tri-City Chamber of Commerce    Kennewick, WA....  One day in July..  46[deg]13'37'' N      119[deg]08'47'' W
 Fireworks/River of Fire
 Festival.
Astoria-Warrenton 4th of July   Astoria, OR......  One day in July..  46[deg]11'34'' N      123[deg]49'28'' W
 Fireworks.
Waterfront Blues Festival       Portland, OR.....  One day in July..  45[deg]30'42'' N      122[deg]40'14'' W
 Fireworks.
Florence Independence Day       Florence, OR.....  One day in July..  43[deg]58'09'' N      124[deg]05'50'' W
 Celebration.
Oaks Park Association 4th of    Portland, OR.....  One day in July..  45[deg]28'22'' N      122[deg]39'59'' W
 July.
City of Rainier/Rainier Days..  Rainier, OR......  One day in July..  46[deg]05'46'' N      122[deg]56'18'' W
Ilwaco July 4th Committee       Ilwaco, WA.......  One day in July..  46[deg]18'17'' N      124[deg]02'00'' W
 Fireworks/Independence Day at
 the Port.
Splash Aberdeen Waterfront      Aberdeen, WA.....  One day in July..  46[deg]58'40'' N      123[deg]47'45'' W
 Festival.
City of Coos Bay July 4th       Coos Bay, OR.....  One day in July..  43[deg]22'06'' N      124[deg]12'24'' W
 Celebration/Fireworks Over
 the Bay.
Port of Cascade Locks 4th of    Cascade Locks, OR  One day in July..  45[deg]40'15'' N      121[deg]53'43'' W
 July Fireworks.
Clatskanie Heritage Days        Clatskanie, OR...  One Day in July..  46[deg]6'17'' N       123[deg]12'02'' W
 Fireworks.
Washougal 4th of July.........  Washougal, WA....  One day in July..  45[deg]34'32'' N      122[deg]22'53'' W
City of St. Helens 4th of July  St. Helens, OR...  One day in July..  45[deg]51'54'' N      122[deg]47'26'' W
 Fireworks.
Waverly Country Club 4th of     Milwaukie, OR....  One day in July..  45[deg]27'03'' N      122[deg]39'18'' W
 July Fireworks.
Hood River 4th of July........  Hood River, OR...  One day in July..  45[deg]42'58'' N      121[deg]30'32'' W
Winchester Bay 4th of July      Winchester Bay,    One day in July..  43[deg]40'56'' N      124[deg]11'13'' W
 Fireworks.                      OR.
Brookings, OR July 4th          Brookings, OR....  One day in July..  42[deg]02'39'' N      124[deg]16'14'' W
 Fireworks.
Yachats 4th of July...........  Yachats, OR......  One day in July..  44[deg]18'38'' N      124[deg]06'27'' W
Lincoln City 4th of July......  Lincoln City, OR.  One day in July..  44[deg]55'28'' N      124[deg]01'31'' W
July 4th Party at the Port of   Gold Beach, OR...  One day in July..  42[deg]25'30'' N      124[deg]25'03'' W
 Gold Beach.
Gardiner 4th of July..........  Gardiner, OR.....  One day in July..  43[deg]43'55'' N      124[deg]06'48'' W
Huntington 4th of July........  Huntington, OR...  One day in July..  44[deg]18'02'' N      117[deg]13'33'' W
Toledo Summer Festival........  Toledo, OR.......  One day in July..  44[deg]37'08'' N      123[deg]56'24'' W
Port Orford 4th of July.......  Port Orford, OR..  One day in July..  42[deg]44'31'' N      124[deg]29'30'' W
The Dalles Area Fourth of July  The Dalles, OR...  One day in July..  45[deg]36'18'' N      121[deg]10'23'' W
Roseburg Hometown 4th of July.  Roseburg, OR.....  One day in July..  43[deg]12'58'' N      123[deg]22'10'' W
Newport 4th of July...........  Newport, OR......  One day in July..  44[deg]37'40'' N      124[deg]02'45'' W
Cedco Inc./The Mill Casino      North Bend, OR...  One day in July..  43[deg]23'42'' N      124[deg]12'55'' W
 Independence Day.
Waldport 4th of July..........  Waldport, OR.....  One day in July..  44[deg]25'31'' N      124[deg]04'44'' W
Westport 4th of July..........  Westport, WA.....  One day in July..  46[deg]54'17'' N      124[deg]05'59'' W
The 4th of July at Pekin Ferry  Ridgefield, WA...  Saturday before    45[deg]52'07'' N      122[deg]43'53'' W
                                                    July 4th.
Bandon 4th of July............  Bandon, OR.......  One day in July..  43[deg]07'29'' N      124[deg]25'05'' W
Garibaldi Days Fireworks......  Garibaldi, OR....  One day in July..  45[deg]33'13'' N      123[deg]54'56'' W

Bald Eagle Days...............  Cathlamet, WA....  One day in July..  46[deg]12'14'' N      123[deg]23'17'' W
Independence Day at the Fort    Vancouver, WA....  One Day in July..  45[deg]36'57'' N      122[deg]40'09'' W
 Vancouver.
Oregon Symphony Concert         Portland, OR.....  One day in August  45[deg]30'42'' N      122[deg]40'14'' W
 Fireworks.                                         or September.
Astoria Regatta...............  Astoria, OR......  One day in August  46[deg]11'34'' N      123[deg]49'28'' W
Leukemia and..................  Portland, OR.....  One day in         45[deg]30'23'' N      122[deg]40'4'' W
Lymphoma Light the Night                            October.
 Fireworks.
Veterans Day Celebration......  The Dalles, OR...  One day in         45[deg]36'18'' N      121[deg]10'34'' W
                                                    November.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

    Dated: September 24, 2018.
J.C. Smith,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2018-21186 Filed 9-27-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: July 15, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 134)]
[Notices]
[Page 34321-34322]
[DOCID:fr15jy09-70]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13480-000]

FFP Project 69, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Competing Applications

July 8, 2009.
    On May 22, 2009, FFP Project 69, LLC filed an application for a
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act,
proposing to study the feasibility of the Breeze Point Hydrokinetic
Project, to be located on the Mississippi River, in Concordia Parish,
Louisiana and Wilkinson County, Mississippi.
    The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant
the permit holder priority to file a license application during the
permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder
to perform any land disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands
or waters owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed Breeze Point Hydrokinetic Project consists of: (1)
4,942 proposed 40 kilowatt Free Flow generating units having a total
installed capacity of 197.68 megawatts; (2) a 6.8-mile-long, 69
kilovolt transmission line; and (3) appurtenant facilities. The
proposed Breeze Point Hydrokinetic Project would have an average annual
generation of 866 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Ramya Swaminathan, Vice President of
Development, Free Flow Power Corporation, 33 Commercial Street,
Gloucester, MA 01930; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Kim Carter,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically,
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to
the

Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-
comments.asp. More information about this project, including a copy of
the application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-13480) in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-16726 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P