[Federal Register: March 23, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 56)]
[Notices]
[Page 13780]
[DOCID:fr23mr07-63]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-349-000]

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes
in FERC Gas Tariff

March 19, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 14, 2007, Columbia Gas Transmission
Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 500B,
to be effective April 2, 2007.
    Columbia also tendered for filing the following non-conforming
Service Agreement for consideration and approval:

FTS Service Agreement No. 92368, Between Columbia Gas Transmission
Corporation and Fortuna Energy, Inc. Dated: March 6, 2007.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-5324 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 147 (Monday, August 1, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45705-45709]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19276]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2011-0471; FRL-9445-9]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Diesel-Powered Motor Vehicle Idling Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve a revision to the
Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revision consists of
the Commonwealth's Diesel-Powered Motor Vehicle Idling Act (hereafter
referred to as the Diesel-Powered Motor Vehicle Idling Act or as Act
124 of 2008, or simply Act 124). Act 124, passed by the Pennsylvania
General Assembly and signed into state law by Governor Rendell in
October 2008 (and effective at the state level in February 2009),
reduces the allowable time that heavy-duty, commercial highway diesel
vehicles of over 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight can idle their main
propulsion engines. The law restricts idling of these commercial diesel
vehicles (mostly heavy trucks and buses) to a period of 5 minutes per
continuous 60 minute period (with certain allowable exemptions and
exclusions). Act 124 applies statewide in the Commonwealth, and is
estimated by Pennsylvania to significantly reduce emissions of nitrogen
oxides, volatile organic compounds, and fine particulate matter. While
idle time emissions limits are not mandatory under the Clean Air Act
(CAA), incorporation of Act 124 into the SIP does strengthen the SIP,
makes the state law federally enforceable by EPA, and allows the
Commonwealth to take credit for emissions benefits from the rule as
part of future Pennsylvania SIP revisions to demonstrate compliance
with CAA National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). EPA is
approving this revision governing idling time limits on commercial
heavy duty vehicles into the Pennsylvania SIP. This action is not a
federal mandate required by the CAA, but provides emission reductions
that aid Pennsylvania in complying with CAA NAAQS. EPA's approval of
this SIP revision is being done in accordance with the requirements of
the CAA.

DATES: This rule is effective on September 30, 2011 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by August 31, 2011.
If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2011-0471 by one of the following methods:
    A. http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    B. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2011-0471, Cristina Fernandez, Associate
Director, Office of Air Program Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
    D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID Number EPA-R03-OAR-
2011-0471. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours at the
Air

Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State
submittal are available at the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market
Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Rehn,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by e-
mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this rulemaking action, whenever
``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we are referring to EPA. The
following outline is provided to aid in locating information in this
preamble.

I. Summary of the SIP Revision
    A. Applicability
    B. Penalties for Violations
    C. Idle Restriction Signage Requirements
    D. Preemption of Local Ordinances and Rules
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Why is EPA approving Pennsylvania's SIP revision?
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Summary of the SIP Revision

    On January 21, 2010, Pennsylvania submitted a SIP revision to
incorporate its Diesel-Powered Motor Vehicle Idling Act. Act 124, as
this statute became known, was effective at the state level on February
6, 2009, and is codified in Title 35, Chapter 23B of the Pennsylvania
Statute. Act 124 restricts unnecessary idling of the main propulsion
engine of in-use diesel-powered commercial, heavy duty motor vehicles
of over 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight rating. With certain
exceptions and exemptions, idling of subject trucks and buses is
restricted to 5 minutes in any continuous 60-minute period. The purpose
of Act 124 is to reduce emissions of air pollutants, including nitrogen
oxides and volatile organic compounds, both of which are precursors to
the formation of ground level ozone, and which are governed by a NAAQS
under authority of the CAA. Act 124 also addresses fine particulate
matter, another group of pollutants which is regulated by a NAAQS under
the Clean Air Act.

A. Applicability

    Act 124 restricts extended idling of diesel-powered highway
vehicles that are used for commercial purposes and have a gross vehicle
weight rating (GVWR) of over 10,000 pounds while operating in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The regulation sets a time limit of five
minutes of idling (i.e., defined as operation of vehicle's main
propulsion engine while the vehicle is stationary) per continuous 60
minute period. Section 3 of Pennsylvania's Act 124 specifically
excludes certain types of highway vehicles from these idling
restrictions, including motor homes, implements of husbandry, and farm
vehicles and equipment.
    These idling restrictions do not apply to a diesel-powered motor
vehicle with a label from the California Air Resources Board showing
that the vehicle's engine meets California's optional idling emission
standard for nitrogen oxide emissions (per applicable California law as
it relates to 1985 and newer heavy-duty vehicles and engines (13 CCR
1956.8(a)(6)(C)).
    For vehicles that are subject to Pennsylvania's Act 124, exemptions
that allow idling beyond the five-minute per hour time limit are
specified therein, including:
    (1) Idling caused by traffic conditions, traffic control devices or
signals, or law enforcement officials;
    (2) idling necessary to operate defrosters, heaters, air
conditioners, or cargo refrigeration equipment, or idling necessary to
install equipment, or idling related to a safety or health emergency
(not for purposes of a rest period), or to comply with manufacturers'
operating requirements or operating specifications or warranties in
accordance with federal or state motor carrier safety regulations;
    (3) idling of a police, fire, ambulance, public safety, military,
utility service, or other law enforcement vehicle or vehicle being used
in an emergency capacity and not for the convenience of the driver;
    (4) idling of the main propulsion engine for maintenance,
particulate matter trap regeneration, servicing, or repair of the
vehicle or for vehicle diagnostic purposes, if idling is required for
that activity;
    (5) idling performed as part of a state inspection to verify the
equipment is in good working order, if necessary as part of the
inspection;
    (6) idling of a primary propulsion engine to power work-related
mechanical, safety, or electrical operations other than propulsion (not
done for cabin comfort or to operation nonessential onboard equipment);
    (7) idling of a primary propulsion engine necessary as part of a
security inspection, such as entering or exiting a facility;
    (8) idling of an armored vehicle when a person remains inside to
guard the contents or during loading or unloading;
    (9) idling due to mechanical difficulties in which the driver has
no control (if the owner submits repair documentation to the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection within 30 days)
verifying that the mechanical problem has been remedied;
    (10) idling of a bus, school bus, or school vehicle to provide heat
or air conditioning when non-driver passengers are onboard (up to a
maximum of 15 minutes per continuous 60 minute period);
    (11) idling necessary for sampling, weighing, active loading or
unloading for an attended motor vehicle waiting for sampling, weighing,
loading, or unloading (up to 15 minutes per continuous 60 minute
period);
    (12) idling by a school bus or school vehicle off school property
during queuing for the sequential discharge or pickup of students where
the physical configuration of the school or surrounding location does
not allow for stopping;
    (13) idling where necessary for maintaining safe operating
conditions while waiting for a police escort when transporting a load
requiring issuance of a special permit for excessive size and weight;
    (14) idling when actively engaged in solid waste collection or the
collection of source-separated recyclable materials (not to apply when
a vehicle is not actively engaged in solid waste or source separated
recyclables collection);

B. Penalties for Violations

    Pennsylvania Act 124 lists penalties that may result from
violations of the idling limits in Section 5 of Act 124. Violations
constitute a summary offense, punishable by a fine of not less than
$150 and not more than $300 and court costs. In addition, the
Commonwealth may issue enforcement orders and civil penalties to aid in
the enforcement of Act 124.

C. Idling Restriction Signage Requirements

    Pennsylvania Act 124 requires that an owner or operator of a
location where vehicles subject to the act load or unload that provide
15 or more parking spaces for vehicles subject to Act 124 shall erect
and maintain permanent signs that inform drivers that idling of heavy,
commercial diesel-powered vehicles is restricted in Pennsylvania.

D. Preemption of Local Ordinances or Rules

    Section 9 of Act 124 preempts and supersedes local ordinance or
rules concerning idling restrictions on vehicles subject to Act 124,
except where the local rule is more restrictive than the provisions of
Act 124 (if the local ordinance or rule was in effect prior to January
1, 2007).

II. What rulemaking action is EPA taking?

    EPA is approving a formal revision to the Pennsylvania SIP
submitted by the Commonwealth on January 21, 2010. This SIP revision
consists of the Diesel-Powered Motor Vehicle Idling Act of 2008
(codified in the Pennsylvania Statute, Title 35, chapter 23B 4601-
4610), which was signed into law by Governor Rendell on October 9, 2008
and became effective as state law on February 6, 2009. EPA is taking
direct final rulemaking action to approve this SIP revision, and is
acting to incorporate by reference Pennsylvania Act 124 of 2008
entitled, ``The Diesel Powered Motor Vehicle Idling Act'' (codified at
Title 35, chapter 23B, 4601-4610 of the Pennsylvania Statute).

III. Why is EPA approving Pennsylvania's SIP revision?

    Pennsylvania's Diesel-Powered Motor Vehicle Idling Act SIP results
in reduced emissions of pollutants that contribute to nonattainment of
NAAQS for ozone and fine particulate matter. Specifically, Pennsylvania
Act 124 leads to elimination of such pollutants resulting from
unnecessary extended idling of heavy-duty, diesel-powered commercial
vehicles. The reduction in vehicle idling resulting from this statute
decreases emissions of volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides,
both of which are ground level ozone pollution precursors.
Pennsylvania's Act 124 also reduces emissions of fine particulate
matter, in addition to carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide.
    The approval of Pennsylvania's Act 124 will strengthen the
Pennsylvania SIP and will assist the Commonwealth in complying with
federal ambient air quality standards, including the NAAQS for ground
level ozone and fine particulate matter. Act 124 is consistent with
EPA's ``Model State Idling Law'' (EPA420-S-06-001, April 2006). This
model rule was developed with input from the states and affected
industry to address extended idling issues in a consistent manner from
state to state and to aid those being regulated in compliance with
compliance with idling limits.

IV. Final Action

    EPA is approving Pennsylvania's Diesel-Powered Motor Vehicle Idling
SIP and incorporating Pennsylvania Act 124 of 2008 into the
Pennsylvania SIP. Act 124 is intended to reduce emissions caused by
unnecessary idling of heavy-duty, diesel-powered, commercial motor
vehicles within the boundaries of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
    EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because we view
this as a noncontroversial amendment and we anticipate we will receive
no adverse comment. Act 124 has been in effect at the state level in
Pennsylvania since February 6, 2009. Therefore, the regulated community
should be accustomed to the idling restrictions imposed by this state
statute.
    Similar provisions for reduced idling have been adopted in many
other states, including the neighboring states of Delaware, Maryland,
New York, New Jersey, Ohio, and West Virginia. We anticipate the
regulated parties will understand Pennsylvania's requirements as they
relate to other nearby states and localities with similar vehicle
idling restrictions. Pennsylvania Act 124 complies with EPA's idling
guidance and model rule. For these reasons, EPA anticipates that this
direct final action to approve Pennsylvania's Diesel-Powered Vehicle
Idling Act SIP revision will not be controversial. However, in the
``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register, EPA is
publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to
approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are filed. This rule will
be effective on September 30, 2011 without further notice unless EPA
receives adverse comment by August 31, 2011. If EPA receives adverse
comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will not take effect. EPA will
address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this
action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register.

This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by September 30, 2011. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking.
    This action to approve the Pennsylvania Diesel-Powered Vehicle
Idling Act SIP revision may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.

    Dated: July 18, 2011.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart NN--Pennsylvania

0
2. In Sec.  52.2020, the table in paragraph (c)(1) is amended by
revising the paragraph title and adding Title 35 Pennsylvania Statute,
Chapter 23B, Sections 4601 to 4610, at the end of the table to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.2020  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                                 (1) EPA-Approved Pennsylvania Regulations and Statutes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                State                                              Additional explanation/Sec.   52.2063
          State citation                Title/subject      effective date             EPA approval date                           citation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                      * * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Title 35 Pennsylvania Statute--Health and Safety
                                                  Chapter 23B--Diesel-Powered Motor Vehicle Idling Act
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 4601......................  Short title..........          2/6/09  8/1/11 [Insert page number where the    .....................................
                                                                            document begins].
Section 4602......................  Definitions..........          2/6/09  8/1/11 [Insert page number where the    .....................................
                                                                            document begins].
Section 4603......................  Restrictions on                2/6/09  8/1/11 [Insert].......................  .....................................
                                     idling.
Section 4604......................  Increase of weight             2/6/09  8/1/11 [Insert page number where the    .....................................
                                     limit.                                 document begins].
Section 4605......................  Penalties............          2/6/09  8/1/11 [Insert page number where the    .....................................
                                                                            document begins].
Section 4606......................  Disposition of fines.          2/6/09  8/1/11 [Insert page number where the    .....................................
                                                                            document begins].
Section 4607......................  Enforcement..........          2/6/09  8/1/11 [Insert page number where the    .....................................
                                                                            document begins].
Section 4608......................  Permanent idling               2/6/09  8/1/11 [Insert page number where the    .....................................
                                     restriction signs.                     document begins].
Section 4609......................  Preemption...........          2/6/09  8/1/11 [Insert page number where the    .....................................
                                                                            document begins].
Section 4610......................  Applicability........          2/6/09  8/1/11 [Insert page number where the    .....................................
                                                                            document begins].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-19276 Filed 7-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 79 (Monday, April 25, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24037-24038]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09470]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 67

[Docket ID FEMA-2016-0002]

Final Flood Elevation Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Base (1% annual-chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) and modified
BFEs are made final for the communities listed below. The BFEs and
modified BFEs are the basis for the floodplain management measures that
each community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of being
already in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for
participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

DATES: The date of issuance of the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
showing BFEs and modified BFEs for each community. This date may be
obtained by contacting the office where the maps are available for
inspection as indicated in the table below.

ADDRESSES: The final BFEs for each community are available for
inspection at the office of the Chief Executive Officer of each
community. The respective addresses are listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) makes the final determinations listed below for the modified
BFEs for each community listed. These modified elevations have been
published in newspapers of local circulation and ninety (90) days have
elapsed since that publication. The Deputy Associate Administrator for
Mitigation has resolved any appeals resulting from this notification.
    This final rule is issued in accordance with section 110 of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR part
67. FEMA has developed criteria for floodplain management in floodprone
areas in accordance with 44 CFR part 60.
    Interested lessees and owners of real property are encouraged to
review the proof Flood Insurance Study and FIRM available at the
address cited below for each community.
    The BFEs and modified BFEs are made final in the communities listed
below. Elevations at selected locations in each community are shown.
    National Environmental Policy Act. This final rule is categorically
excluded from the requirements of 44 CFR part 10, Environmental
Consideration. An environmental impact assessment has not been
prepared.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood elevation determinations are
not within the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
    Regulatory Classification. This final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 of September 30, 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR
51735.
    Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This final rule involves no
policies that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
    Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This final rule meets
the applicable standards of Executive Order 12988.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67

    Administrative practice and procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: April 11, 2016.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation, Department
of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
    Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is amended as follows:

PART 67--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 67 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp., p. 376.

Sec.  67.11  [Amended]

0
2. The tables published under the authority of Sec.  67.11 are amended
as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      * Elevation in
                                                                      feet (NGVD)  +
                                                                    Elevation in feet
                                                                     (NAVD)  # Depth
           Flooding source(s)              Location of referenced     in feet above      Communities  affected
                                                 elevation           ground  [caret]
                                                                       Elevation in
                                                                       meters (MSL)
                                                                         Modified
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Clay County, Arkansas, and Incorporated Areas
                                             Docket No.: FEMA-B-1145
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cypress Creek Ditch....................  Approximately 150 feet                 + 281  City of Corning.
                                          east of Southwest 11th
                                          Street to approximately
                                          400 feet east of
                                          Southwest 11th Street.
                                         Approximately 120 feet                 + 281
                                          south of Lucien Avenue
                                          to approximately 580
                                          feet north of Lucien
                                          Avenue.
Cypress Creek Ditch....................  Approximately 100 feet                 + 281  City of Corning.
                                          north of Bryan Avenue to
                                          approximately 160 feet
                                          south of Bryan Street.
                                         Approximately 430 feet                 + 281
                                          west of Southwest 6th
                                          Street to approximately
                                          600 feet west of
                                          Southwest 6th Street.
Sugar Creek............................  Approximately 1,255 feet               + 282  Unincorporated Areas of
                                          downstream of Pfeiffer                        Clay County.
                                          Street.
                                         Approximately 0.57 mile                + 317
                                          upstream of the
                                          confluence with Club
                                          Drain.

Tributary 2............................  Approximately 1,350 feet               + 329  Unincorporated Areas of
                                          upstream of West Jackson                      Clay County.
                                          Street.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
# Depth in feet above ground.
[caret] Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.

                                                    ADDRESSES
City of Corning
Maps are available for inspection at City Hall, 304 Southwest Second Street, Corning, AR 72422.

                                       Unincorporated Areas of Clay County
Maps are available for inspection at the Clay County Conservation District, 168 East Main Street, Piggott, AR
 72454.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2016-09470 Filed 4-22-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register: August 28, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 166)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 49168-49170]
[DOCID:fr28au07-12]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-29071; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-097-AD;
Amendment 39-15183; AD 2007-18-03]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500
Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. This AD
requires an inspection of the seat locks and seat tracks of the
flightcrew seats to ensure that the seats lock in position and to
verify that lock nuts and bolts of adequate length are installed on the
rear tracklock bracket, and corrective actions if necessary. This AD
results from a report indicating that the captain's seat slid aft and
jammed during taxi. We are issuing this AD to prevent uncommanded
movement of the flightcrew seats during acceleration and take-off of
the airplane, which could result in reduced controllability of the
airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective September 12, 2007.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of September 12,
2007.
    We must receive comments on this AD by October 29, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this AD.
     DOT Docket Web site: Go to http://dms.dot.gov and follow

the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
 and follow the instructions for sending your

comments electronically.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Hand Delivery: Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for service information identified in this AD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Gillespie, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We have received a report indicating that the captain's seat slid
aft and jammed during taxi. A subsequent investigation found that two
of the three screws attaching the rear tracklock bracket broke. The
broken screws allowed excessive lateral movement and disengagement of
the locking pin from the floor-mounted seat track. In addition, we have
received some reports of loosened screws that attach the tracklock
bracket to the rear cross member of the seat base. An incorrectly
aligned seat track locking pin can cause the locking pin to not fully
engage the seat track. These conditions, if not corrected, could result
in uncommanded movement of the flightcrew seats during acceleration and
take-off of the airplane, which could result in reduced controllability
of the airplane.

Other Related Rulemaking

    We previously issued AD 2004-04-03, amendment 39-13483 (69 FR 7565,
February 18, 2004), applicable to certain Boeing Model 737-300, -400,
and -500 series airplanes. (A correction of AD 2004-04-03 was published
in the Federal Register on April 13, 2004 (69 FR 19313).) That AD
requires a one-time general visual inspection of the seat locks and
seat tracks of the flightcrew seats to ensure that the seats lock in
position and to verify that lock nuts and bolts of adequate length are
installed on the rear track lock bracket, and corrective action, if
necessary.
    Since issuance of AD 2004-03-03, we have determined that the same
unsafe condition addressed in that AD may exist on certain additional
Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. Boeing has
advised us that airplanes having variable numbers PS971 through PS978,
PT187, and PT188 were omitted inadvertently from the effectivity of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-25A1363, Revision 1, dated March 28,
2002 (referred to in the applicability of AD 2004-04-03 as the
appropriate source of service information for identifying the affected
airplanes). Therefore, these additional airplanes are also subject to
the same unsafe condition addressed in AD 2004-03-03.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-25A1363,
Revision 2, dated May 2, 2006. Revision 2 was issued to add airplanes
having variable numbers PS971 through PS978, PT187, and PT188, and to
make editorial changes. The procedures for inspecting the seat locks
and seat tracks of the flightcrew seats, and corrective actions if
necessary, are essentially identical to those in Revision 1 of the
service bulletin. No more work is necessary on airplanes changed as
shown in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-25A1363, dated November 5,
1998, or Revision 1, dated March 28, 2002. Accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information is intended to adequately address
the unsafe condition.
    Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-25A1363 refers to IPECO Service
Bulletin A001-25-47, Issue 2, dated July 31, 2002, as an additional
source of service information for accomplishment of the inspection and
rework.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD

    The unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or
develop on other airplanes of the same type design that may be
registered in the U.S. at some time in the future. Therefore, we are
issuing this AD to prevent uncommanded movement of the flightcrew seats
during acceleration and take-off of the airplane, which could result in
reduced controllability of the airplane. This AD requires accomplishing
the actions specified in the service information described previously.

Costs of Compliance

    None of the airplanes affected by this action are on the U.S.
Register. All airplanes affected by this AD are currently operated by
non-U.S. operators under foreign registry; therefore, they are not
directly affected by this AD action. However, we consider this AD
necessary to ensure that the unsafe condition is addressed if any
affected airplane is imported and placed on the U.S. Register in the
future.
    If an affected airplane is imported and placed on the U.S. Register
in the future, the required actions would take between 1 and 3 work
hours per airplane, at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour.

Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the AD would be between
$80 and $240 per airplane.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    No airplane affected by this AD is currently on the U.S. Register.
Therefore, providing notice and opportunity for public comment is
unnecessary before this AD is issued, and this AD may be made effective
in less than 30 days after it is published in the Federal Register.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements that affect
flight safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for
public comment; however, we invite you to submit any relevant written
data, views, or arguments regarding this AD. Send your comments to an
address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-
2007-29071; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-097-AD'' at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall
regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the AD that
might suggest a need to modify it.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://dms.dot.gov
, including any personal information you provide. We will

also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this AD. Using the search function of that Web
site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or signed
the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you may visit
http://dms.dot.gov.

Examining the Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov
, or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is located on the
ground level of the West Building at the DOT street address stated in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after the Docket Management System receives them.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec.  39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

2007-18-03 Boeing: Amendment 39-15183. Docket No. FAA-2007-29071;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-097-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD becomes effective September 12, 2007.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500
series airplanes, variable numbers PS971 through PS978, PT187, and
PT188, certificated in any category.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from a report indicating that the captain's
seat slid aft and jammed during taxi. We are issuing this AD to
prevent uncommanded movement of the flightcrew seats during
acceleration and take-off of the airplane, which could result in
reduced controllability of the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Inspection and Corrective Action

    (f) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, do a
one-time general visual inspection of the seat locks and seat tracks
of the flightcrew seats to ensure that the seats lock in position
and to verify that lock nuts and bolts of adequate length are
installed on the rear tracklock bracket, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
25A1363, Revision 2, dated May 2, 2006.
    (1) If the seat lock pin fully engages in all lock positions of
the seat track, and the rear track lock bracket is correctly
installed: No further action is required by this AD.
    (2) If the seat lock pin does not fully engage in all positions
of the seat track, before further flight, make sure the flightcrew
seat operates correctly, in accordance with the service bulletin.
    (3) If the lock nuts and bolts of adequate length are not
installed on the rear tracklock bracket, before further flight,
rework the flightcrew seat in accordance with the service bulletin.

    Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection
is: ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or
irregularity. This level of inspection is made from within touching
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror may be necessary to
ensure visual access to all surfaces in the inspection area. This
level of inspection is made under normally available lighting
conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or
droplight and may require removal or opening of access panels or
doors. Stands,

ladders, or platforms may be required to gain proximity to the area
being checked.''

    Note 2: Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-25A1363, Revision 2,
dated May 2, 2006, refers to IPECO Service Bulletin A001-25-47,
Issue 2, dated July 31, 2002, as an additional source of service
information for accomplishment of the inspection and rework required
by paragraphs (f) and (f)(3) of this AD, respectively.

    (g) Actions done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-25A1363, dated
November 5, 1998; or Revision 1, dated March 28, 2002, is acceptable
for compliance with the corresponding action specified in this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-25A1363,
Revision 2, dated May 2, 2006, to perform the actions that are
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director
of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of
this document in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for a copy of this service information. You
may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, S.W., Renton, Washington; or at the National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to:
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 17, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E7-16909 Filed 8-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: September 29, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 189)]
[Notices]
[Page 56592-56595]
[DOCID:fr29se08-87]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0500]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Requirements on Content and Format of Labeling for
Human Prescription Drug and Biological Products

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the

notice. This notice solicits comments on the information collection
provisions of FDA's requirements on content and format of labeling for
human prescription drug and biological products.

DATES:  Submit written or electronic comments on the collection of
information by November 28, 2008.

ADDRESSES:  Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

Requirements on Content and Format of Labeling for Human Prescription
Drug and Biological Products (OMB Control Number 0910-0572)--Extension

    FDA's final rule entitled ``Requirements on Content and Format of
Labeling for Human Prescription Drug and Biological Products'' (the
final rule), which published on January 24, 2006 (71 FR 3922), and was
effective on June 30, 2006, amended FDA's regulations governing the
format and content of labeling for human prescription drug and
biological products to require that the labeling of new and recently
approved products contain highlights of prescribing information, a
table of contents for prescribing information, reordering of certain
sections, minor content changes, and minimum graphical requirements.
These revisions were intended to make it easier for health care
practitioners to access, read, and use information in prescription drug
labeling; to enhance the safe and effective use of prescription drug
products; and to reduce the number of adverse reactions resulting from
medication errors due to misunderstood or incorrectly applied drug
information.

A. Summary of Prescription Drug Labeling Content and Format
Requirements That Contain Collections of Information

    Section 201.56 (21 CFR 201.56) requires that prescription drug
labeling contain certain information in the format specified in either
Sec.  201.57 (21 CFR 201.57) or Sec.  201.80 (21 CFR 201.80), depending
on when the drug was approved for marketing.
    Section 201.56(a) sets forth general labeling requirements
applicable to all prescription drugs. Section 201.56(b) specifies the
categories of new and more recently approved prescription drugs subject
to the revised content and format requirements in Sec. Sec.  201.56(d)
and 201.57. Section 201.56(c) sets forth the schedule for implementing
these revised content and format requirements. Section 201.56(e)
specifies the sections and subsections, required and optional, for the
labeling of older prescription drugs not subject to the revised format
and content requirements.
    Section 201.57(a) requires that prescription drug labeling for new
and more recently approved prescription drug products include
``Highlights of Prescribing Information.'' Highlights provides a
concise extract of the most important information required under Sec.
201.57(c) (the Full Prescribing Information (FPI)), as well as certain
additional information important to prescribers. Section 201.57(b)
requires a table of contents to prescribing information, entitled
``Full Prescribing Information: Contents,'' consisting of a list of
each heading and subheading along with its identifying number to
facilitate health care practitioners' use of labeling information.
Section 201.57(c) specifies the contents of the FPI. Section 201.57(d)
mandates the minimum specifications for the format of prescription drug
labeling and establishes minimum requirements for key graphic elements
such as bold type, bullet points, type size, and spacing.
    Older drugs not subject to the revised labeling content and format
requirements in Sec.  201.57 remain subject to labeling requirements at
Sec.  201.80 (in the final rule, former Sec.  201.57 was redesignated
as Sec.  201.80). Section 201.80(f)(2) requires that within 1 year, any
FDA-approved patient labeling be referenced in the ``Precautions''
section of the labeling of older products and either accompany or be
reprinted immediately following the labeling.

B. Estimates of Reporting Burden

    The PRA information collection analysis in the final rule (71 FR
3964 through 3967) (currently approved under OMB Control Number 0910-
0572) estimated the reporting burden for a multi-year period. We are
requesting that OMB extend approval for the information in this
collection as described below, which will continue to be submitted to
FDA during this multi-year period.

Annual Burden for Prescription Drug Labeling Design, Testing, and
Submitting to FDA for New Drug Applications (NDAs) and Biologics
License Applications (BLAs) (Sec. Sec.  201.56 and 201.57) (Table 1)

    New drug product applicants must: (1) Design and create
prescription drug labeling containing Highlights, Contents, and FPI,
(2) test the designed labeling (e.g., to ensure that the designed
labeling fits into carton-enclosed products), and (3) submit it to FDA
for approval. Based on the projected data estimated in the final rule,
FDA estimates that it takes applicants approximately 3,349 hours to
design, test, and submit prescription drug labeling to FDA as part of
an NDA or BLA under the revised regulations. Approximately 85
applicants submit approximately 107 new applications (NDAs and BLAs) to
FDA per year, totaling 358,343 hours.

Burden Associated with Labeling Supplements for Applications Approved
Within 5 Years Prior to the Effective Date of the Rule (Sec.  201.57)
(Table 2)

    The final rule required that prescription drug applications
approved during the 5 years before, or pending on, the effective date
conform to format and content requirements at Sec.  201.57. For these
products, applicants must redesign and negotiate the labeling,
including Highlights and Contents, test the redesigned labeling, and
prepare and submit that labeling to FDA for approval. Based on the
projected data estimated in the final rule, labeling supplements for a
total of approximately 344 innovator products are expected to be
submitted to FDA over a 5-year period (beginning in year 3 and ending
in year 7 after the effective date of the final rule). Approximately
172 applicants submit these labeling supplements, and the time required
for redesigning, testing, and submitting the labeling to FDA is
approximately 196 hours per application, totaling 67,424 hours.

Burden Associated with Revised Labeling Efficacy Supplements Submitted
on or After the Effective Date of the Rule (Sec. Sec.  201.56(d) and
201.57) (Table 2)

    Efficacy supplemental applications for older drugs submitted to FDA
on or after the effective date of the final rule are subject to the
content and format requirements of Sec. Sec.  201.56(d) and 201.57. To
meet these requirements, applicants must revise the existing labeling
for these products. Each year an increasing number of innovator drug
labeling will have been revised, and over time, very few efficacy
supplements independently will generate labeling revisions. Based on
the projected data estimated in the final rule, the number of affected
efficacy supplements over 10 years, beginning with year 3, is 186, with
a decreasing number each year over the period. Approximately 172
applicants will trigger approximately 186 efficacy supplements, each
one requiring approximately 196 hours to revise the labeling in the
application, totaling 36,456 hours. (As stated in the final rule, in
addition to this burden, a minimal annual reporting burden (fewer than
7) will continue indefinitely).

Burden Associated with Revised Labeling for Efficacy Supplements for
Generic Drug Products (Sec.  201.57) (Table 2)

    Based on the projected data estimated in the final rule, beginning
in year 3 and continuing throughout the 10-year period analyzed,
approximately 42 generic applicants per year must submit labeling
supplements. Approximately 336 already approved generic drug
applications must submit labeling supplements over the 10-year period
after the effective date of the rule. The time required to revise and
submit this labeling to FDA is approximately 27 hours per application,
totaling 9,072 hours. (As stated in the final rule, in addition to this
burden, a minimal annual reporting burden associated with a very small
number of generic applications referencing older drugs may continue
indefinitely).

C. Capital Costs

    As discussed in the final rule, a small number of carton-enclosed
products may require new packaging to accommodate longer inserts. As
many as 5 percent of the existing products affected by the final rule
(i.e., products with new efficacy supplements, products approved in the
5 years prior to the effective date of the rule, and affected
abbreviated new drug applications) may require equipment changes at an
estimated cost of $200,000 each product.

                                            Table 1.--Estimated Reporting Burden For New Drug Applications\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              No. of       No. of Responses per                         Hours per
               Category (21 CFR Section)                   Respondents          Respondent        Total Responses        Response         Total Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Burden for Labeling Requirements in Sec.  Sec.                  85                  1.26                107              3,349            358,343
  201.56 and 201.57
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                                                                358,343
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

        Table 2.--Estimated Reporting Burdens For Labeling Revisions To Already-Approved Drug Products\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Year(s) In
Category (21 CFR  Which Burdens     No. of        No. of         Total      Hours per                   Total
    Section)       Occur After   Respondents   Responses per   Responses     Response   Total Hours    Capital
                  June 30, 2006                 Respondent                                              Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Burden           Beginning              172               2          344          196       67,424         $3.3
 associated with   year 3,                                                                               million
 revised           ending year
 labeling for      7
 applications
 approved within
 5 years prior
 to June 30,
 2006 (Sec.
 201.57)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burden            Beginning              172            1.08          186          196       36,456         $2.5
 associated with   year 3,                                                                               million
 revised           diminishing
 labeling for      over time
 efficacy
 supplements
 submitted on or
 after June 30,
 2006 (Sec.
 Sec.
 201.56(d) and
 201.57)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Burden            Beginning               42               8     336 (for           27        9,072         $2.5
 associated with   year 3,                                    years 1-10)                                million
 revised           continuing
 labeling for      annually
 efficacy          thereafter
 supplements for
 generic drug
 products (Sec.
  201.57)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                                                                112,952   Up to $8.3
                                                                                million
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide, electronic docket management
system. Electronic comments or submissions will be accepted by FDA only
through FDMS at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: September 17, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-22731 Filed 9-26-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 107 (Monday, June 4, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32921-32922]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13365]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0384; Airspace Docket No. 12-ANM-9]

Proposed Amendment of Class D and E Airspace; Lewiston, ID

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify Class E airspace at Lewiston-
Nez Perce County Airport, Lewiston, ID. Controlled airspace is
necessary to accommodate aircraft using Area Navigation (RNAV) Global
Positioning System (GPS) standard instrument approach procedures at
Lewiston-Nez Perce County Airport, Lewiston, ID. The geographic
coordinates of the airport and navigation aids also would be adjusted
in the respective Class D and Class E airspace areas. The FAA is
proposing this action to enhance the safety and management of aircraft
operations at Lewiston-Nez Perce County Airport, Lewiston, ID.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 19, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2012-
0384; Airspace Docket No. 12-ANM-9, at the beginning of your comments.
You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA 2012-0384 and Airspace Docket No. 12-ANM-9) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2012-0384 and Airspace Docket No. 12-ANM-9''. The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by modifying Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at Lewiston-Nez Perce County
Airport, Lewiston, ID, to accommodate aircraft using RNAV (GPS)
standard instrument approach procedures at the airport. Also, the
geographic coordinates of the airport, the Nez Perce VOR/DME, and the
Lewiston-Nez Perce ILS Localizer navigation aids, would be updated to
coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database for the respective Class
D airspace and Class E airspace areas. This action would enhance the
safety and management of aircraft operations at Lewiston-Nez Perce
County Airport, Lewiston, ID.
    Class D and E airspace designations are published in paragraphs
5000, 6002, 6004, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9V, dated
August 9, 2011, and effective September 15, 2011, which is incorporated
by reference in 14 CFR Part 71.1. The Class D and E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
this Order.
    The FAA has determined this proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since
this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified this proposed rule, when
promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes
the authority for the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's

authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would modify controlled airspace at Lewiston-Nez Perce
County Airport, Lewiston, ID.
    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR Part 71.1 of the
Federal Aviation Administration Order 7400.9V, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15,
2011 is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D airspace.

* * * * *

ANM ID D Lewiston, ID [Modified]

Lewiston-Nez Perce County Airport, ID
    (Lat. 46[deg]22'28'' N., long. 117[deg]00'55'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,900 feet MSL within a 4.1-mile radius of the Lewiston-Nez Perce
County Airport. This Class D airspace area is effective during the
specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

Paragraph 6002 Class E airspace designated as surface areas.

* * * * *

ANM ID E2 Lewiston, ID [Modified]

Lewiston-Nez Perce County Airport, ID
    (Lat. 46[deg]22'28'' N., long. 117[deg]00'55'' W.)

    Within a 4.1-mile radius of the Lewiston-Nez Perce County
Airport. This Class E airspace area is effective during the specific
dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The
effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in
the Airport/Facility Directory.

Paragraph 6004 Class E airspace designated as an extension to a
Class D surface area.

* * * * *

ANM ID E4 Lewiston, ID [Modified]

Lewiston-Nez Perce County Airport, ID
    (Lat. 46[deg]22'28'' N., long. 117[deg]00'55'' W.)
Nez Perce VOR/DME
    (Lat. 46[deg]22'54'' N., long. 116[deg]52'10'' W.)
Lewiston-Nez Perce ILS Localizer
    (Lat. 46[deg]22'27'' N., long. 117[deg]01'54'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 2.7 miles
each side of the Lewiston-Nez Perce ILS localizer course extending
from the 4.1-mile radius of the airport to 14 miles east of the
airport and within 3.5 miles each side of the Nez Perce VOR/DME
266[deg] radial extending from the 4.1-mile radius of the airport to
13.1 miles west of the airport. This Class E airspace area is
effective during the specific dates and times established in advance
by a Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter
be continuously published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ANM ID E5 Lewiston, ID [Modified]

Lewiston-Nez Perce County Airport, ID
    (Lat. 46[deg]22'28'' N., long. 117[deg]00'55'' W.)
Walla Walla VOR/DME
    (Lat. 46[deg]05'13'' N., long. 118[deg]17'33'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
bounded by a line beginning at lat. 46[deg]33'00'' N., long.
117[deg]38'00'' W.; to lat. 46[deg]31'30'' N., long 117[deg]14'00''
W.; to lat. 46[deg]40'00'' N., long. 116[deg]48'00'' W.; to lat.
46[deg]26'00'' N., long. 116[deg]26'00'' W.; to lat. 46[deg]13'00''
N., long. 116[deg]30'00'' W.; to lat. 46[deg]14'00'' N., long.
116[deg]35'00'' W.; to lat. 46[deg]06'00'' N., long. 116[deg]47'00''
W.; to lat. 46[deg]17'00'' N., long. 116[deg]49'00'' W.; to lat.
46[deg]18'00'' N., long 117[deg]00'00'' W.; to lat. 46[deg]17'30''
N., long. 117[deg]22'00'' W.; to lat. 46[deg]10'30'' N., long.
117[deg]26'30'' W.; to lat. 46[deg]12'00'' N., long. 117[deg]36'00''
W.; thence to point of beginning; that airspace extending upward
from 1,200 feet above the surface bounded by a line beginning at
lat. 46[deg]00'00'' N., long. 116[deg]00'04'' W.; to lat.
46[deg]00'00'' N., long. 116[deg]19'00'' W.; to lat. 45[deg]39'00''
N., long. 116[deg]10'03'' W.; to lat. 45[deg]30'00'' N., long.
116[deg]14'03'' W.; to lat. 45[deg]23'00'' N., long. 116[deg]21'03''
W.; to lat. 45[deg]25'00'' N., long. 116[deg]34'04'' W.; to lat.
45[deg]30'00'' N., long. 116[deg]46'04'' W.; to lat. 46[deg]00'00''
N., long. 116[deg]56'04'' W.; thence west along lat. 46[deg]00'00''
N., to the Walla Walla VOR/DME 16.6-mile radius, thence counter
clockwise along the Walla Walla VOR/DME 16.6-mile radius until
intercepting V-536, thence northeast along V-536 and southeast along
V-2 until intercepting long. 115[deg]15'04'' W.; thence south along
long. 115[deg]15'04'' W., until intercepting V-187; thence southeast
along V-187 until intercepting long. 116[deg]00'00'' W.; thence
south along long. 116[deg]00'00'' W.; to lat. 46[deg]15'00'' N.; to
lat. 46[deg]00'00'' N., long. 115[deg]50'00'' W.; thence to the
point of beginning.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on May 23, 2012.
John Warner
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2012-13365 Filed 6-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 20, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60314-60315]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27409]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Parts 100, 117, 147, and 165

[USCG-2017-0694]

2016 Quarterly Listings; Safety Zones, Security Zones, Special
Local Regulations, Drawbridge Operation Regulations and Regulated
Navigation Areas

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of expired temporary rules issued.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice of substantive rules issued by
the Coast Guard that were made temporarily effective but expired before
they could be published in the Federal Register. This notice lists
temporary safety zones, security zones, special local regulations,
drawbridge operation regulations and regulated navigation areas, all of
limited duration and for which timely publication in the Federal
Register was not possible.

DATES: This document lists temporary Coast Guard rules that became
effective, primarily between October 2016 and December 2016, unless
otherwise indicated, and were terminated before they could be published
in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Temporary rules listed in this document may be viewed
online, under their respective docket numbers, using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions on this notice contact
Yeoman First Class David Hager, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Coast Guard District Commanders and Captains
of the Port (COTP) must be immediately responsive to the safety and
security needs within their jurisdiction; therefore, District
Commanders and COTPs have been delegated the authority to issue certain
local regulations. Safety zones may be established for safety or
environmental purposes. A safety zone may be stationary and described
by fixed limits or it may be described as a zone around a vessel in
motion. Security zones limit access to prevent injury or damage to
vessels, ports, or waterfront facilities. Special local regulations are
issued to enhance the safety of participants and spectators at regattas
and other marine events. Drawbridge operation regulations authorize
changes to drawbridge schedules to accommodate bridge repairs, seasonal
vessel traffic, and local public events. Regulated Navigation Areas are
water areas within a defined boundary for which regulations for vessels
navigating within the area have been established by the regional Coast
Guard District Commander.
    Timely publication of these rules in the Federal Register may be
precluded when a rule responds to an emergency, or when an event occurs
without sufficient advance notice. The affected public is, however,
often informed of these rules through Local Notices to Mariners, press
releases, and other means. Moreover, actual notification is provided by
Coast Guard patrol vessels enforcing the restrictions imposed by the
rule. Because Federal Register publication was not possible before the
end of the effective period, mariners were personally notified of the
contents of these safety zones, security zones, special local
regulations, regulated navigation areas or drawbridge operation
regulations by Coast Guard officials on-scene prior to any enforcement
action. However, the Coast Guard, by law, must publish in the Federal
Register notice of substantive rules adopted. To meet this obligation
without imposing undue expense on the public, the Coast Guard
periodically publishes a list of these temporary safety zones, security
zones, special local regulations, regulated navigation areas and
drawbridge operation regulations. Permanent rules are not included in
this list because they are published in their entirety in the Federal
Register. Temporary rules are also published in their entirety if
sufficient time is available to do so before they are placed in effect
or terminated.
    The following unpublished rules were placed in effect temporarily
during the period between October 2016 and December 2016 unless
otherwise indicated. To view copies of these rules, visit
www.regulations.gov and search by the docket number indicated in the
list below.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Docket No.                            Type                      Location           Effective date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USCG-2016-0485..........................  Safety Zone...............  Erie, PA..................        6/4/2016

USCG-2016-0583..........................  Security Zones............  Buffalo, NY...............       6/17/2016
USCG-2016-0712..........................  Safety Zone...............  Cleveland, OH.............       7/21/2016
USCG-2016-0417..........................  Special Local Regulations.  Louisville, KY............       8/27/2016
USCG-2016-0881..........................  Safety Zone...............  Hampton, IL...............       9/12/2016
USCG-2016-0634..........................  Special Local Regulations.  Nashville, TN.............       9/30/2016
USGC-2016-0826..........................  Safety Zone...............  Santa Cruz, CA............       10/1/2016
USCG-2016-0869..........................  Safety Zone...............  Florence, AL..............       10/1/2016
USCG-2016-0777..........................  Special Local Regulations.  San Diego, CA.............       10/2/2016
USCG-2016-0732..........................  Special Local Regulations.  Clearwater, FL............       10/2/2016
USGC-2016-0927..........................  Safety Zone...............  Allegheny River...........       10/2/2016
USCG-2012-0459..........................  Special Local Regulations.  San Francisco, CA.........       10/7/2016
USCG-2016-0944..........................  Safety Zone...............  Bethel Island, CA.........       10/7/2016
USCG-2011-0489..........................  Safety Zone...............  Chicago Burnham Park             10/7/2016
                                                                       Harbor.
USCG-2016-0849..........................  Security Zones............  Biloxi, MS................       10/8/2016
USCG-2016-0862..........................  Safety Zone...............  Richmond, CA..............       10/8/2016
USCG-2016-0871..........................  Safety Zone...............  San Francisco, CA.........       10/8/2016
USCG-2009-0559..........................  Safety Zone...............  Rio Vista, CA.............       10/8/2016
USGC-2016-0901..........................  Special Local Regulations.  Chattanooga, TN...........       10/8/2016
USCG-2016-0958..........................  Safety Zone...............  Inola, OK.................      10/12/2016
USGC-2016-0945..........................  Safety Zone...............  Pittsburgh, PA............      10/13/2016
USCG-2016-0910..........................  Drawbridges...............  New Bern, NC..............      10/15/2016
USCG-2016-0732..........................  Special Local Regulations.  Clearwater, FL............      10/15/2016
USCG-2016-0876..........................  Drawbridges...............  Sacramento, CA............      10/16/2016
USCG-2016-0969..........................  Security Zones............  Boston, MA................      10/19/2016
USCG-2016-0967..........................  Safety....................  Piti, Guam................      10/20/2016
USCG-2016-0971..........................  Security Zones............  Cleveland, OH.............      10/21/2016
USCG-2016-0955..........................  Special Local Regulations.  Chattanooga, TN...........      10/22/2016
USCG-2016-0981..........................  Security Zones............  Pittsburgh, PA............      10/25/2016
USCG-2016-0820..........................  Special Local Regulations.  Mayaguez Bay, PR..........      10/29/2016
USCG-2016-0970..........................  Safety Zone...............  Tanguisson, GUAM..........      10/29/2016
USCG-2016-0960..........................  Safety....................  Harbor, GU................      10/31/2016
USCG-2016-0961..........................  Safety....................  Harbor, Guam..............       11/3/2016
USCG-2016-0995..........................  Safety Zone...............  Bellingham, WA............       11/9/2016
USCG-2016-0995..........................  Safety Zone...............  Bellingham, WA............       11/9/2016
USCG-2016-0929..........................  Safety Zone...............  Portland, OR..............      11/13/2016
USCG-2016-1028..........................  Safety Zone...............  Beaufort, NC..............      11/17/2016
USCG-2016-1032..........................  Safety Zone...............  Drummonds, TN.............      11/19/2016
USCG-2016-0947..........................  Safety....................  Merizo, GU................      11/20/2016
USCG-2016-1030..........................  Security Zones............  Palm Beach, FL............      11/22/2016
USCG-2016-1033..........................  Safety Zone...............  Moriches Bay, NY..........      11/22/2016
USCG-2012-1036..........................  Safety Zone...............  Oak dale, NY..............      11/26/2016
USCG-2016-0984..........................  Special Local Regulations.  Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico....      11/27/2016
USCG-2016-1052..........................  Safety Zone...............  Helena, AR................       12/2/2016
USCG-2016-1051..........................  Safety Zone...............  Orange, TX................       12/2/2016
USCG-2016-0979..........................  Safety Zone...............  Biloxi, MS................       12/3/2016
USCG-2016-1035..........................  Safety Zone...............  Vicksburg, MS.............       12/3/2016
USCG-2016-0974..........................  Safety Zone...............  Savannah, GA..............       12/4/2016
USCG-2016-1036..........................  Drawbridges...............  Seattle, WA...............       12/8/2016
USCG-2016-1070..........................  Safety Zone...............  Fitler, MS................      12/11/2016
USCG-2016-1069..........................  Safety Zones..............  Calumet, LA...............      12/13/2016
USCG-2016-1072..........................  Safety Zone...............  Fitler, MS................      12/15/2016
USGC-2016-1075..........................  Safety Zones..............  Drummonds, TN.............      12/16/2016
USCG-2009-0559..........................  Special Local Regulations.  Rio Vista, CA.............      12/30/2016
USGC-2016-1082..........................  Safety Zone...............  Chicago, IL...............      12/31/2016
USCG-2016-1079..........................  Safety Zone...............  Tumon, GU.................      12/31/2016
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Katia Kroutil,
Office Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-27409 Filed 12-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P