[Federal Register: April 9, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 69)]
[Notices]
[Page 19201-19205]
[DOCID:fr09ap08-35]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

April 02, 2008.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC08-61-000.
    Applicants: Forward Energy LLC, EFS Forward, LLC.
    Description: Forward Energy LLC et al. submits an application for
authorization for a transaction that would result in a change in the
ownership.
    Filed Date: 03/27/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-0031.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, April 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: EC08-62-000.
    Applicants: OAO Severstal, ISG Acquisition, Inc., ISG Sparrows
Point, LLC.
    Description: Application for Order Under Section 203 of the Federal
Power Act and Request for Waivers, Expedited Action, and Confidential
Treatment.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-5024.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 21, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: EC08-63-000.
    Applicants: Granite Ridge Energy, LLC, Merrill Lynch Credit
Products, LLC.
    Description: Granite Ridge Energy LLC et al. submits an Application
for FERC to approve the proposed transfer of equity interests in
Granite Ridge.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0085.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: EC08-65-000.
    Applicants: Southaven Power, LLC.
    Description: Application for authorization for disposition of
jurisdictional facilities and request for expedited action re:
Southaven Power LLC.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0081.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: EC08-66-000.
    Applicants: JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bear Stearns Companies Inc., and
its Public Utility Subsidiaries.
    Description: Application of JPMorgan Chase & Co & The Bears Stearns
Companies Inc for authorization of certain securities and the merger of
facilities subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080402-0066.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 14, 2008.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG08-52-000.
    Applicants: North Allegheny Wind, LLC.
    Description: Self Certification Notice of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status for North Allegheny Wind, LLC.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-5126.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 21, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: EG08-53-000.
    Applicants: Wessington Wind I, LLC.
    Description: Self Certification Notice of Wessington Wind I, LLC.
    Filed Date: 04/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-5218.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 22, 2008.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER91-569-039; ER02-862-010; ER01-666-010; ER91-569-
040; ER01-1804-008.
    Applicants: Entergy Services, Inc.; Entergy Power Ventures, L.P.;
EWO Marketing, LP; Entergy Power, Inc.; Warren Power, LLC.
    Description: Entergy Services Inc et al. submits revised market-
based rate tariffs reflecting the new tariff requirements established
in Order 697.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0074.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 21, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER02-298-004; ER08-584-001.
    Applicants: Thompson River Co-Gen, LLC.
    Description: Thompson River Power, LLC submits a notice of
succession and a notice of change in status informing the Commission
that it has succeeded to the market-based rate tariff of Thompson River
Co-Gen, LLC.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0057.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1511-001.
    Applicants: Noble Thumb Windpark I, LLC.
    Description: Noble Thumb Windpark I, LLC notifies the Commission of
a non-material change in status resulting from a change in the size of
the 48 MW Wind-Power Generation Project under development.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-0160.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER03-534-007.
    Applicants: INGENCO Wholesale Power L.L.C.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of INGENCO
Wholesale Power L.L.C.
    Filed Date: 04/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-5096.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 22, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1372-004.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits Substitute Second Revised Sheet 454.01 et al. to FERC Electric
Tariff, Third Revised Volume 1, in compliance with FERC's 2/25/08
Order.
    Filed Date: 03/27/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-0063.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, April 16, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-149-004.
    Applicants: Northeast Utilities Service Company.
    Description: Supplemental Information to NUSCO's Feb. 12, 2008,
Compliance Filing.
    Filed Date: 04/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-5161.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 22, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-376-001; ER08-455-001; ER08-520-001.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits their compliance
filing, pursuant to FERC's 3/25/08 Order.
    Filed Date: 04/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080402-0160.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 08, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-379-002.
    Applicants: Rensselaer Cogeneration LLC.
    Description: Rensselaer Cogeneration LLC submits its amended
proposed market based rate tariff entitled FERC Electric Tariff
Revised, Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0056.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 21, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-632-001.
    Applicants: DC Energy Texas, LLC.
    Description: DC Energy Texas, LLC submits an Amendment to the
Petition for Market-Based Rate Application filed on 3/3/08.
    Filed Date: 03/27/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080328-0137.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, April 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-646-000.
    Applicants: Northeast Utilities Service Company.
    Description: Northeast Utilities Service Company submits a Notice
of Cancellation cancelling a Service Agreement for long-term firm
transmission service dated 12/23/93 and a Service Agreement for long-
term non-firm transmission service dated 8/22/94, etc.
    Filed Date: 03/07/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080310-0183.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 9, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-651-002.
    Applicants: Ameren Energy Marketing Company.
    Description: Ameren Energy Marketing Company submits the revised
final form Confirmation Agreement for the request for proposals for
capacity for the planning year 6/1/08 through 5/31/09, etc.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-0159.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-653-002.
    Applicants: Union Electric Company.
    Description: Union Electric Company submits the revised final form
of the Confirmation Agreement for the request for proposals for
capacity for the planning year 6/1/08 through 5/31/09, etc.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-0158.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-669-001.
    Applicants: American Electric Power Service Corporation.
    Description: American Electric Power System submits the corrected
tariff sheets and cost support reflecting reductions to Texas Central
Company annual transmission rate.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-0156.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-719-001.
    Applicants: Xcel Energy Operating Companies.
    Description: Twin Cities Hydro LLC submits a Certificate of
Concurrence for Northern States Power Company.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-0157.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-729-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.
    Description: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC submits a revised Network
Integration Service Agreement for Network Integration Transmission
Service with Piedmont Electric Membership Corporation.
    Filed Date: 03/27/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080328-0131.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, April 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-730-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.
    Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC submits Third Revised Rate Schedule 316,
the First Amended and Restated Full Requirements Power Purchase
Agreement with Piedmont Electric Membership Corp.
    Filed Date: 03/27/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080328-0134.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, April 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-731-000.
    Applicants: DC Energy California, LLC.
    Description: DC Energy California, LLC submits the Application
requests acceptance of FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 1 under
which DCE California will engage in wholesale electric power and energy
transactions as an electric power marketer etc.
    Filed Date: 03/27/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080328-0139.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, April 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-732-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. submits its Open Access
Transmission Tariff, SPP is revising several provisions of its executed
external market advisor services agreement with Boston Pacific Company,
Inc.
    Filed Date: 03/27/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080328-0138.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, April 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-733-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Pacific Gas and Electric Company submits the Notice of
Cancellation of PG&E Rate Schedule FERC 213, the interconnection
Agreement between PG&E and Turlock Irrigation District.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080328-0140.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-734-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Power and Light Company.
    Description: Wisconsin Power and Light Company submits a Notice of
Cancellation of Original Service Agreement 8 with the City of
Evansville.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-0054.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-735-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Power and Light Company.
    Description: Wisconsin Power and Light Company submits a Notice of
Cancellation of Original Service Agreement 6 with Wisconsin Public
Power Inc.

    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-0055.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-736-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Power and Light Company.
    Description: Wisconsin Power and Light Company submits a Notice of
Cancellation of Original Service Agreement 20 with Wisconsin Public
Power Inc.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-0057.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-737-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Power and Light Company.
    Description: Wisconsin Power and Light Company submits a Notice of
Cancellation of Original Service Agreement 14 with Village of Mt.
Horeb.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-0056.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-738-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Power and Light Company.
    Description: Wisconsin Power and Light Company submits a Notice of
Cancellation of Original Service Agreement 15 with Wisconsin Public
Power Inc.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-0058.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-739-000.
    Applicants: Appalachian Power Company.
    Description: American Electric Power Company Inc. submits First
Revised Sheet 13 et al. to FERC Rate Schedule 151.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-0059.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-740-000.
    Applicants: Appalachian Power Company.
    Description: Appalachian Power Company submits a Cost-Based Formula
Rate Agreement--Rate Schedule 157 for Full Requirements Electric
Service dated 03/26/07 with Kingsport Power Company.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-0060.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-741-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits a Letter
Agreement for Services to Replace the Remote Terminal Unit at TM
Goodrich Receiving Station between City of Pasadena.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-0155.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-742-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Electric Company.
    Description: El Paso Electric Company submits an unexecuted cost-
based formula rate Power Sales Agreement for Full Requirements
Wholesale Electric Service with Rio Grande Electric Cooperative Inc.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0079.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-742-001.
    Applicants: El Paso Electric Company.
    Description: El Paso Electric Company submits an unexecuted cost-
based formula rate Power Sales Agreement for Full Requirements
Wholesale Electric Service between EPE and Rio Grande Electric
Cooperative Inc.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0061.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 21, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-743-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool Inc. submits revised pages to its
Open Access Transmission Tariff or intended to implement a rate change
for Westar Energy, Inc., which is a transmission owner and pricing zone
under the SPP tariff.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0064.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-744-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection LLC submits revisions to the PJM
Open Access Transmission Tariff and Amended and Restated Operating
Agreement.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0065.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-746-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. submits a proposal to
revise its OATT.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0095.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-748-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Electric and Gas Company; PSEG Energy
Resources & Trade LLC.
    Description: Public Service Electric and Gas Co et al. submit a
request for waivers of affiliate standards and authorizations for sales
etc.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-4009; 20080401-0093.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 21, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-749-000.
    Applicants: Xcel Energy; Southwestern Public Service Company.
    Description: Southwestern Public Service Company submits increased
rates, to be effective 6/1/08, applicable to service to the wholesale
full requirements customers etc.
    Filed Date: 04/02/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080402-0062.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 23, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-753-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Electric Company.
    Description: El Paso Electric Company submits a Network Operating
Agreement executed with Rio Grande Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0060.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-754-000.
    Applicants: The American Electric Power Service Corp.
    Description: American Electric Power Service Corporation submits a
Notice of Cancellation of Service Agreements under CSW Operating
Companies Second Substitute FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 8.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0063.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 21, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-756-000.
    Applicants: Southern Company Services, Inc.
    Description: Southern Company Services, Inc. on behalf of Alabama
Power Company et al. submits Transmission Facility Cost Allocation
Tariff and Pro Forma Service Agreement.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0059.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-757-000.
    Applicants: The American Electric Power Service Corp.
    Description: American Electric Power Service Corporation submits
Notice of Cancellation of Service Agreements under American Electric
Power Service Corporation's FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised Volume
2, effective 3/31/08.

    Filed Date: 03/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0062.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 21, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-758-000.
    Applicants: The American Electric Power Service Corp.
    Description: American Electric Power Company Inc. submits Notice of
Cancellation of Service Agreements under American Electric Power
Service Corporation's FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 5.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0066.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 21, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-759-000.
    Applicants: San Diego Gas & Electric Company.
    Description: San Diego Gas & Electric Company submits changes in
the rates set forth in its Transmission Owner Tariff.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0058.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-760-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
submits proposed amendments to the ISO Tariff to implement a
Transitional Capacity Procurement Mechanism.
    Filed Date: 03/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0080.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-761-000.
    Applicants: Carolina Power & Light Company.
    Description: Carolina Power & Light Company doing business as
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. submits a Power Sales Agreement between
PEC and North Carolina Electric membership Corporation, Rate Schedule
FERC 179, etc.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-0055.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 21, 2008.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:
    Docket Numbers: ES08-39-000.
    Applicants: Allegheny Generating Company; Monongahela Power
Company; West Penn Power Company; The Potomac Edison Company.
    Description: Joint Application Under Section 204 of the Federal
Power Act for Authorization Under Section 204(A) to Issue Short-Term
Debt in Connection with the Allegheny Money Pool by Monongahela Power
Company, et al.
    Filed Date: 04/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080402-5009.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 22, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ES08-40-000.
    Applicants: Golden Spread Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Application of Golden Spread Electric Cooperative,
Inc., for Authorization to Issue Securities.
    Filed Date: 04/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080402-5011.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 22, 2008.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following open access
transmission tariff filings:
    Docket Numbers: OA07-28-002.
    Applicants: Avista Corporation.
    Description: Avista Corporation's Compliance Filing.
    Filed Date: 04/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-5106.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 22, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: OA07-44-003.
    Applicants: El Paso Electric Company.
    Description: El Paso Electric Company submit an Annual Compliance
Report as required by order Nos. 890 and 890-A.
    Filed Date: 04/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-5176.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 22, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: OA07-53-002; OA08-67-002.
    Applicants: Progress Energy, Inc.
    Description: Correction Filing supplements March 3, 2008,
compliance filing by Progress Energy, Inc., on behalf of Carolina Power
& Light Co. and Florida Power Corp.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080331-5074.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 21, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: OA07-104-001.
    Applicants: Maine Public Service Company.
    Description: Maine Public Service Company submits Substitute First
Revised Sheet 163 et al. to FERC Electric Tariff, 1st Revised Volume 4,
in compliance with the Commission's 2/25/08 Letter Order.
    Filed Date: 03/26/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080328-0122.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 16, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: OA08-63-000.
    Applicants: Ohio Valley Electric Corporation.
    Description: Order No. 890-A OATT Filing of Ohio Valley Electric
Corporation.
    Filed Date: 03/14/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080314-5084.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 09, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: OA08-78-001.
    Applicants: MidAmerican Energy Company.
    Description: Errata to Order No. 890-A Implementation Filing.
    Filed Date: 03/31/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-5132.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 21, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: OA08-93-001.
    Applicants: South Carolina Electric & Gas Company.
    Description: Redline Tariff of South Carolina Electric & Gas
Company.
    Filed Date: 03/27/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080328-5122.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, April 17, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: OA08-96-000.
    Applicants: Southern Company.
    Description: Order No. 890 compliance filing of Southern Company's
proposing mechanisms for the distribution of penalty revenues.
    Filed Date: 04/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080401-5172.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 22, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: OA08-97-000.
    Applicants: MidAmerican Energy Company.
    Description: Order Nos. 890 and 890-A Implementation Filing of
MidAmerican Energy Company.
    Filed Date: 04/01/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080402-5035.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 22, 2008.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic

service, persons with Internet access who will eFile a document and/or
be listed as a contact for an intervenor must create and validate an
eRegistration account using the eRegistration link. Select the eFiling
link to log on and submit the intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

 Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-7421 Filed 4-8-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 78 (Friday, April 23, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21191-21194]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9492]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2010-0238]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulation; Detroit APBA Gold Cup, Detroit River,
Detroit, MI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a temporary special
local regulation in the Captain of the Port Detroit Zone on the Detroit
River, Detroit, Michigan. This special local regulation is intended to
restrict vessels from portions of the Detroit River during the Detroit
APBA Gold Cup. This special local regulation is necessary to protect
spectators and vessels from the hazards associated with powerboat
races.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 24, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2010-0238 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail CDR Joseph Snowden, Prevention Department, Sector
Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2010-0238), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via http://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via http://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2010-0238'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to

know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-
addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2010-0238'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.

Background and Purpose

    This temporary special local regulation is necessary to ensure the
safety of vessels and spectators from hazards associated with a
powerboat race. The Captain of the Port Detroit has determined
powerboat races in close proximity to watercraft and infrastructure
pose significant risk to public safety and property. The likely
combination of large numbers of recreation vessels, powerboats
traveling at high speeds, and large numbers of spectators in close
proximity to the water could easily result in serious injuries or
fatalities. Establishing a special local regulation around the location
of the race course will help ensure the safety of persons and property
at these events and help minimize the associated risks.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    This proposed temporary special local regulation is necessary to
ensure the safety of spectators and vessels during the setup, course
familiarization, testing and race in conjunction with the Detroit APBA
Gold Cup. The powerboat race and associated testing will occur between
7 a.m. on July 7, 2010 and 7 p.m. on July 11, 2010. The special local
regulation will be enforced daily from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on July 7-11,
2010.
    The special local regulation will encompass all waters of the
Detroit River, between Detroit, MI and Belle Isle, within an area bound
on the west by a north south line created by the Belle Isle Bridge,
starting on land in Detroit at position 42[deg]20'07'' N;
083[deg]00'00'' W and extending south to a point on Belle Isle at
position 42[deg]20'04'' N; 082[deg]59'08'' W, and bound on the east by
a north-south line starting on land in Detroit at position
42[deg]21'03'' N; 082[deg]57'07'' W, and extending south to a point on
Belle Isle at position 42[deg]21'00'' N; 082[deg]57'07'' W. All
geographic coordinates are North American Datum of 1983 [NAD 83].
    All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated on scene patrol
personnel. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the special
local regulation area is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port Detroit or his designated on scene representative. The Captain
of the Port or his designated on scene representative may be contacted
via VHF Channel 16.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
    We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
    This determination is based on the minimal time that vessels will
be restricted from the zone and the zone is an area where the Coast
Guard expects minimal adverse impact to mariners from the zone's
activation.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: the owners and operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of the Detroit River near Detroit, MI
between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. on July 7-11, 2010.
    This special local regulation area will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the
following reasons: This rule will only be enforced for twelve hours on
each day for five days total. In the event that this temporary special
local regulation affects shipping, commercial vessels may request
permission from the Captain of the Port Detroit to transit through the
special local regulation area. The Coast Guard will give notice to the
public via a Broadcast Notice to Mariners that the regulation is in
effect and when it is being enforced.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental

jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact CDR Joseph Snowden, Prevention
Department, Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-
mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this proposed
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

 Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

 Indian Tribal Governments

    The Coast Guard recognizes the treaty rights of Native American
Tribes. Moreover, the Coast Guard is committed to working with Tribal
Governments to implement local policies and to mitigate tribal
concerns. We have determined that this rule and fishing rights
protection need not be incompatible. We have also determined that this
proposed rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Nevertheless, Indian
Tribes that have questions concerning the provisions of this proposed
rule or options for compliance are encouraged to contact the point of
contact listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

 Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a special local regulation. Based on our preliminary
determination, there are no factors in this case that would limit the
use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, we believe that this rule should be categorically excluded.
Because this event establishes a special local regulation, paragraph
(34)(h) of figure 2-1 of the Instruction applies. Thus, no further
environmental documentation is required. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

    1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.

    2. Add a new temporary Sec.  100.35T09-0238 as follows:

Sec.  100.35T09-0238  Special Local Regulation; Detroit APBA Gold Cup;
Detroit River; Detroit, MI.

    (a) Location. The following is a temporary special local regulation
area: all waters of the Detroit River, between Detroit, MI and Belle
Isle, within an area bound on the west by a north south line created by
the Belle Isle Bridge, starting on land in Detroit at position
42[deg]20'07'' N; 083[deg]00'00'' W and extending south to a point on
Belle Isle at position 42[deg]20'04'' N; 082[deg]59'08'' W, and bound

on the east by a north-south line starting on land in Detroit at
position 42[deg]21'03'' N; 082[deg]57'07'' W, and extending south to a
point on Belle Isle at position 42[deg]21'00'' N; 082[deg]57'07'' W.
(DATUM: NAD 83).
    (b) Effective Period. This regulation is effective from 7 a.m. on
July 7, 2010, to 7 p.m. on July 11, 2010. This regulation will be
enforced daily from 7 a.m. until 7 p.m. on July 7-11, 2010.
    (c) Regulations.
    (1) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec.  100.35 of
this part, entry into, and transiting or anchoring within this special
local regulation area is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port Detroit, or his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This special local regulation area is closed to all vessel
traffic, except as may be permitted by the Captain of the Port Detroit
or his designated on-scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. The on-
scene representative of the Captain of the Port will be aboard either a
Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port or
his designated on scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the
special local regulation area shall contact the Captain of the Port
Detroit or his on-scene representative to obtain permission to do so.
Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the special
local regulation area must comply with all directions given to them by
the Captain of the Port or his on-scene representative.

    Dated: April 8, 2010.
E.J. Marohn,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2010-9492 Filed 4-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46940-46943]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19088]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0046; Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-040-AD;
Amendment 39-17136; AD 2012-15-07]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Glasflugel Gliders

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Glasflugel Models Standard Libelle-201B, Club Libelle 205, Mosquito,
and Kestrel gliders. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as corrosion
damage to the elevator control rod that could lead to failure of the
elevator control rod, possibly resulting in loss of control of the
glider. We are issuing this AD to require actions to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective September 11, 2012.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of September 11,
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Glasfaser
Flugzeug-Service Hansj[ouml]rg Streifeneder GmbH, D-72582
Grabenstetten, Germany; phone: +49(0)73821032, fax: +49(0)73821629;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: www.streifly.de/. You may review
copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106;

telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on January 19, 2012 (77
FR 2674). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    A broken elevator control rod in the vertical fin on a Kestrel
sailplane has been reported. The technical investigation revealed
that water had soaked into the elevator control rod through a
control bore hole and resulted in corrosion damage. The
investigation concluded as well that the corrosion cannot be
detected from outside the elevator control rod.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to
failure of the elevator control rod, possibly resulting in loss of
control of the sailplane.
    To address this unsafe condition, Glasfaser Flugzeug-Service
GmbH have developed and published Technical Note (TN) TN 201-40, TN
205-27, TN 206-26, TN 303-25, TN 304-12, TN 401-30, TN 501-10, TN
604-11, which provides instructions for elevator control rod
inspection and replacement.
    For the reasons described above, EASA issued AD 2011-0213 to
require a one-time inspection and replacement of the affected
elevator control rod with an improved part.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request FAA Withdraw the Proposed AD

    Jack Corneveaux wrote that virtually all gliders covered under this
proposed action are stored in covered trailers or hangers and not left
out in the weather. Therefore, they are not subject to problems from
moisture. He claims that those few gliders that have had the elevator
control rod replaced were found with the original elevator control rod
in perfect condition.
    The commenter also wrote that this rule was generated in Europe due
to one instance where an elevator control rod on a Hornet was
defective. He states that we do not know if this aircraft was
mistreated by leaving it out in the weather or any other details that
might have caused the problem. Jack Corneveaux concluded that the
proposed fix is expensive, time consuming, and probably unnecessary.
    Although no specific change was requested, based on the comments,
we infer that the commenter requested the FAA withdraw the proposed AD.
    We do not agree with the comments. The FAA cannot know the storage
details of every aircraft on the U.S. registry. Therefore, we cannot
determine the actual amount of time that any given aircraft is subject
to the effects of weather, in general, and moisture, in particular. The
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) issued MCAI based on a broken
elevator control rod in the vertical fin on a Kestrel glider caused by
corrosion damage from water soaking into the rod through a control bore
hole.
    The investigation by EASA and the type certificate (TC) holder
concluded that the corrosion could not be detected from outside the
elevator control rod and, if not detected and corrected, could lead to
a failure of the elevator control rod and resultant loss of control of
the aircraft. We concur with the findings of EASA and the TC holder.
While we recognize the financial burden that this AD places on the
gliding community, this does not diminish the need to accomplish the
inspection and replacement of the elevator control rod to address the
unsafe condition.
    We have made no changes to this AD action based on these comments.

Request FAA Allow Certified A&P Mechanics To Accomplish AD Actions

    Jack Corneveaux requested that the FAA allow the actions of the
proposed AD be done by any certified A&P mechanic since the recommended
repair stations are hundreds of miles apart in the United States.
    Although not directly referenced within the comment, the repair
station requirement comes from Glasfaser Flugzeug Service GmbH
Technical Note TN 201-40, TN 205-27, TN 206-26, TN 303-25, TN 304-12,
TN 401-30, TN 501-10, and TN 604-11, Revision 1, dated July 14, 2011
(EASA translation approval dated September 9, 2011), referenced in the
proposed AD which states in the Action section:

    Note: Replacement of control rod (Action 2 to 4) must be carried
out by an authorised service facility.

    We agree with the comment because within the United States
regulatory system, there is no need for the actions required by the AD
to be done solely by a repair station. 14 CFR 43.3 defines who is
authorized to perform maintenance, preventative maintenance,
rebuilding, and alterations. This section includes certificated
mechanics in addition to repair stations.
    We added text to the body of the AD that specifies that the actions
mandated by this AD may be accomplished by persons authorized to
perform maintenance in accordance with 14 CFR 43.3 and by persons
authorized to approve aircraft for return to service after maintenance
in accordance with 14 CFR 43.7.

Request FAA Approve Use of Endoscope As Alternate Inspection Method

    Jack Corneveaux suggested that the elevator control rod be
inspected using an endoscope. He wrote that this alternative inspection
method has been successfully accomplished in Australia.
    We do not agree with the comments. The FAA cannot make a
determination of the acceptability of this alternative inspection
method based on the information provided. The commenter may apply for
an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. The commenter should include the AMOC application and
all associated substantiating data for review.
    We have made no changes to this AD action based on these comments.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the change described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (77 FR 2674, January 19, 2012) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 2674, January 19, 2012).
    We also determined that these changes would not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 54 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take about 6 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $333 per product.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the AD on U.S.
operators to be $45,522, or $843 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2012-15-07 Glasflugel: Amendment 39-17136; Docket No. FAA-2012-0046;
Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-040-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective September
11, 2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the following Glasflugel models and serial
number (S/N) gliders, certificated in any category:
    (1) Club Libelle 205, all S/Ns
    (2) Kestrel, all S/Ns, except S/N 85, 110, and 125
    (3) Mosquito, all S/Ns
    (4) Standard Libelle-201B, S/N 169

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 27: Flight
Controls.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as corrosion damage
to the elevator control rod that could lead to failure of the
elevator control rod, possibly resulting in loss of control of the
glider. We are issuing this AD to require actions to address the
unsafe condition on these products.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) Within 30 days after September 11, 2012 (the effective date
of this AD), inspect the elevator control rod in the vertical fin
following Glasfaser Flugzeug-Service GmbH Technical Note TN 201-40,
TN 205-27, TN 206-26, TN 303-25, TN 304-12, TN 401-30, TN 501-10,
and TN 604-11, Revision 1, dated July 14, 2011 (EASA translation
approval dated September 9, 2011), as applicable to glider model.
    (2) If you find any discrepancy in the inspection required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, before further flight, replace the
elevator control rod with an elevator control rod that does not have
a control bore hole, following Glasfaser Flugzeug-Service GmbH
Technical Note TN 201-40, TN 205-27, TN 206-26, TN 303-25, TN 304-
12, TN 401-30, TN 501-10, and TN 604-11, Revision 1, dated July 14,
2011 (EASA translation approval dated September 9, 2011), as
applicable to glider model.
    (3) Within 9 months after September 11, 2012 (the effective date
of this AD), unless already done as required by paragraph (f)(2) of
this AD, replace the elevator control rod in the vertical fin with
an elevator control rod that does not have a control bore hole,
following Glasfaser Flugzeug-Service GmbH Technical Note TN 201-40,
TN 205-27, TN 206-26, TN 303-25, TN 304-12, TN 401-30, TN 501-10,
and TN 604-11, Revision 1, dated July 14, 2011 (EASA translation
approval dated September 9, 2011), as applicable to glider model.
    (4) As of September 11, 2012 (the effective date of this AD), do
not install an elevator control rod with a control bore hole.
    (5) The actions mandated by this AD may be accomplished by
persons authorized to perform maintenance in accordance with 14 CFR
43.3 and by persons authorized to approve aircraft for return to
service after maintenance in accordance with 14 CFR 43.7.

(g) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and

suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA
at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

(h) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.:
2011-0213R1, dated November 8, 2011; and Glasfaser Flugzeug-Service
GmbH Technical Note TN 201-40, TN 205-27, TN 206-26, TN 303-25, TN
304-12, TN 401-30, TN 501-10, and TN 604-11, Revision 1, dated July
14, 2011 (EASA translation approval dated September 9, 2011), for
related information. For service information related to this AD,
contact Glasfaser Flugzeug-Service Hansj[ouml]rg Streifeneder GmbH,
D-72582 Grabenstetten, Germany; phone: +49(0)73821032, fax:
+49(0)73821629; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: www.streifly.de/.
You may review copies of the referenced service information at the
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

(i) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) You must use the following service information to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference (IBR) under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51:
    (i) Glasfaser Flugzeug Service GmbH Technical Note TN 201-40, TN
205-27, TN 206-26, TN 303-25, TN 304-12, TN 401-30, TN 501-10, and
TN 604-11, Revision 1, dated July 14, 2011.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Glasfaser Flugzeug-Service Hansj[ouml]rg Streifeneder GmbH, D-72582
Grabenstetten, Germany; phone: +49(0)73821032, fax: +49(0)73821629;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: www.streifly.de/.
    (3) You may review copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on July 18, 2012.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2012-19088 Filed 8-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 79 (Monday, April 27, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19031-19034]
[FR Doc No: E9-9575]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2008-1180]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; BWRC `300' Enduro; Lake Moolvalya, Parker, AZ

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes a safety zone, on the navigable
waters of the Lake Moolvalya region on the lower Colorado River in
support of the Bluewater Resort and Casino `300' Enduro. This safety
zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the participants, crew,
spectators, participating vessels, and other vessels and users of the
waterway. Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his designated
representative.

DATES: Comments and related material must either be submitted to our
Online docket via http://www.regulations.gov on or before May 27, 2009
or reach the Docket Management Facility by that date.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG-2008-1180 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these methods. For instructions on submitting comments, see the
``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of

the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Petty Officer Shane Jackson, USCG, Waterways Management,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego at<PHONE_NUMBER>. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee
V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2008-1180), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online, or by fax, mail or hand delivery, but please use only one of
these means. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing
address, an e-mail address, or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
    To submit your comment Online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the
screen, insert ``USCG-XXXX-XXXX'' in the Docket ID box, press Enter,
and then click on the balloon shape in the Actions column. If you
submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the
screen, insert USCG-2008-1180 in the Docket ID box, press Enter, and
then click on the item in the Docket ID column. You may also visit
either the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays; or the U.S. Coast Guard
Sector San Diego, 2710 N. Harbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92101 between 8
a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We
have an agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the
Docket Management Facility.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments received into
any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the Department of
Transportation's Privacy Act notice regarding our public dockets in the
January 17, 2008 issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that
one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

Background and Purpose

    RPM Racing Enterprises is sponsoring the Bluewater Resort and
Casino `300' Enduro. The event is a closed boat endurance race
consisting of 30 to 50 powerboats ranging from 16 to 26 feet in length.
The sponsor will provide four water rescue boats and eight patrol boats
for this event. This safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety
of the participants, crew, spectators, sponsor vessels, and other users
of the waterway.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes a safety zone that would be enforced from
6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on October 23, 2009 to October 25, 2009. The limits of
the safety zone would be as follows: The Headgate Dam at 34[deg]11.20
N., 114[deg]13.74 W. following the river northeast to 34[deg]11.76 N.,
114[deg]13.50 W.
    This safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the
crews, spectators, and participants of the event and to protect other
vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and vessels will be
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within
this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his
designated representative.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
    We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. This
determination is based on the size and location of the safety zone.
Commercial vessels will not be hindered by the safety zone.
Recreational vessels will not be allowed to transit through the
designated safety zone during the specified times.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
    This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in the Lake Moolvalya region on the
lower Colorado River from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on October 23, 2009 to
October 25, 2009.
    This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule would be in effect for twelve hours for a period of 3 days.
Although the safety zone would apply to the entire width of the

river, traffic would be allowed to pass through the zone with the
permission of the Coast Guard patrol commander. Before the effective
period, we will publish a local notice to mariners (LNM) and will issue
broadcast notice to mariners (BNM) alerts via marine channel 16 VFH
before the safety zone is enforced.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Petty Officer Kristen Beer,
USCG, Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego at (619)
278-7233. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for Federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for Federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 0023.1 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' supporting this preliminary
determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. This proposed rule involves regulations that establish a
temporary safety zone to provide for the safety of personnel during the
BWRC `300' Enduro. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

    1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 122, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

    2. Add temporary safety zone Sec.  165.T11-145 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T11-145  Safety zone; BWRC `300' Enduro; Lake Moolvalya,
Parker, AZ.

    (a) Location. The limits of the proposed safety zone are as
follows: the Headgate Dam at 34[deg]11.20 N., 114[deg]13.74 W.
following the river northeast to 34[deg]11.76 N., 114[deg]13.50 W.
    (b) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 6 a.m.
to 6 p.m. on October 23, 2009 through October 25, 2009. If the event
concludes prior to the scheduled termination time, the Captain of the
Port will cease enforcement of this safety zone and will announce that
fact via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
    (c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section:
designated representative means any commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, and local, State, and Federal law enforcement vessels who
have been authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
    (d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port of San Diego or his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) Mariners requesting permission to transit through the safety
zone may request authorization to do so from the Patrol Commander
(PATCOM). The PATCOM may be contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16.
    (3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated representative.
    (4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed.
    (5) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other Federal, State, or
local agencies.

    Dated: February 13, 2009.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. E9-9575 Filed 4-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P