[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 44 (Monday, March 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10533-10535]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4784]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61616; File No. SR-NYSE-2010-12]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by New York Stock Exchange LLC as
Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto Clarifying the Implementation Date
of the Amendments to NYSE Rule 123C To Modify the Procedures for Its
Closing Process and Make Conforming Changes to NYSE Rules 13 and 15

March 1, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on February 25, 2010, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. On March
1, 2010, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on
the proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to clarify the implementation date of the
amendments to NYSE Rule 123C (Market On The Close Policy And Expiration
Procedures) to modify the procedures for its closing process; and make
conforming changes to NYSE Rules 13 (``Definitions of Orders'') and 15
(``Pre-Opening Indications''). The text of the proposed rule change is
available at the Exchange, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and
http://www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the ``Exchange'') submits
this filing to clarify the implementation date of amendments to NYSE
Rule 123C (Market On The Close Policy And Expiration Procedures) to
modify the procedures for its closing process; and make conforming
changes to NYSE Rules 13 (``Definitions of Orders'') and 15 (``Pre-
Opening Indications'') approved by the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 23, 2009 (``Close \3\ Modifications'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Included in these amendments were conforming changes related
to the information disseminated prior to the opening transaction
which are also proposed in this filing.
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Release No. 34-61233 (December 23,
2009), 74 FR 69169 (December 30, 2009) (SR-NYSE-2009-111).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that similar changes are proposed to the rules
of its affiliate, NYSE Amex LLC.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See SR-NYSEAmex-2010-17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background
    In 2009, the NYSE implemented changes designed to streamline and
improve the efficiency of its closing process, which included
establishing a single print for the closing transactions, activating
systemic compliance filters for market at-the-close (``MOC'') and limit
at-the-close (``LOC'') orders and enhancing the transparency of its
informational data feed for imbalances by including d-Quotes \6\ and
all other e-Quotes \7\ containing pegging instructions eligible to
participate in the closing transaction in the NYSE Order Imbalance
Information datafeed.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See definition of d-Quotes NYSE Rule 70, Supplementary
Material .25.
    \7\ See definition of e-Quotes NYSE Rule 70(a).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Release No. 59345 (February 3,
2009), 74 FR 6444 (February 9, 2009) (SR-NYSE-2009-10) (Establishing
a single print for the closing transaction). See also, Securities
Exchange Release No. 60153 (June 19, 2009), 74 FR 30656 (June 26,
2009) (SR-NYSE-2009-49) (Inclusion of d-Quotes and all other e-
Quotes containing pegging instructions eligible to participate in
the closing transaction NYSE Order Imbalance Information datafeed).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, on December 23, 2009, the SEC approved the Exchanges
filing to implement Close Modifications designed to further streamline
the closing process, enhance transparency on the close and allow for
greater customer participation when there is an imbalance in a security
prior to the closing transaction. Pursuant to the Close Modifications,
the NYSE amended NYSE Rule 123C to: (i) Extend the time for the entry
of MOC/LOC orders \9\ from 3:40 p.m. to 3:45 p.m.; (ii) amend the
procedures for the entry of MOC/LOC orders in response to imbalance
publications and regulatory trading halts; (iii) change to the
cancellation time for MOC/LOC orders to 3:58 p.m.; (iv) require only
one mandatory imbalance publication; (v) rescind the provisions
governing Expiration Friday Auxiliary Procedures for the Opening and
Due Diligence Requirements; (vi) modify the dissemination of Order
Imbalance Information pursuant to NYSE Rule 123C(6) to commence at 3:45
p.m.; (vii) include additional information in both the pre-opening and
pre-closing Order Imbalance Information data feeds; (viii) amend NYSE
Rule 13 to create a conditional-instruction limit order type called the
Closing Offset Order (``CO order''), which may only be used to offset
an existing imbalance of orders on the close; (ix) delete the ``At the
Close'' order type from NYSE Rule 13 and replace it with the specific
definitions of MOC/LOC orders; and (x) codify the hierarchy of
allocation of interest in the closing transaction in NYSE Rule 123(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ In the NYSE Rules and for the purposes of this discussion,
the terms ``market-on-close'' and ``limit-on-close'' are used
interchangeably with ``market-at-the-close'' and ``limit-at-the-
close''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Implementation of Closing Modifications
    The Exchange has not made operative the amendments described above.
Based on feedback from the member firm community, the NYSE has delayed
the implementation of the Closing Modifications to March 1, 2010. The
Exchange believes that commencing operation of the Closing
Modifications on March 1, 2010, will provide participants with
additional time to ensure that the member firms community will be
systemically ready to comply with the new provisions of the Rule.
    The Exchange anticipates that the Close Modifications will be
operative in all securities effective March 1, 2010; however, should
conditions arise to delay the implementation of the Close
Modifications, the Exchange will provide information to its
constituents about changes to the start date via its Trader Update
Notices that are sent via e-mail to subscribers and posted on the
Exchange's Web site.
Deletion of Erroneously Included Text
    The Exchange further proposes to delete NYSE Rule 123C(5)(d).
Specifically, NYSE Rule 123C(5)(d) is duplicative rule text. It
addresses the publication of the Order Imbalance Information data feed
in the event of an early close. NYSE Rule 123C(5)(d) is the exact same
language as NYSE Rule 123C(6)(a)(v) (``Publication of Order Imbalance
Information Data Feed''). The paragraph was inadvertently copied into
the wrong section and should therefore be deleted.
2. Statutory Basis
    The basis under the Act for this proposed rule change is the
requirement under Section 6(b)(5) \10\ that an Exchange have rules that
are designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. The instant proposal is in keeping
with these principles in that it provides transparency to market
participants by explaining the anticipated operation date of the Close
Modifications and the locations where market participants may find
information about any changes to the anticipated operative date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does
not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the filing.\13\
However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii), the Commission may designate
a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The Exchange requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative delay, as specified in Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii),\14\ which would make the rule change operative
immediately. The Exchange believes that waiver of the operative delay
is appropriate because the proposed rule change is merely a
clarification of the operative date of previously approved amendments
to the Exchange's rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) requires the self-regulatory organization to give the
Commission notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. NYSE has satisfied this requirement.
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest
because it merely clarifies the operative date of a previously approved
rule change. Accordingly, the Commission designates the proposed rule
change, as amended, as operative upon filing with the Commission.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ For purposes only of waiving the operative delay for this
proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact
on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2010-12 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2010-12. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, on official
business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSE-2010-12 and should be submitted on or before March
29, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2010-4784 Filed 3-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: September 7, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 173)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 51358-51359]
[DOCID:fr07se07-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2007-28776; Airspace Docket No. 07-ACE-10]

Amendment to Class E Airspace; Lee's Summit, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends the Class E airspace area at Lee's Summit
Municipal Airport, Lee's Summit, MO. A review of the legal description
revealed an incorrect coordinate describing the Airport Reference Point
(ARP) for Lee's Summit Municipal Airport. This action corrects that
error.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, December 20, 2007. Comments for
inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or before October 1,
2007. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation
by reference action under title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part
51, subject to the annual revision of FAAF Order 7400.9 and publication
of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this direct final rule to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building,
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590. You must identify the docket number FAA-2007-28776/Airspace
Docket No. 07-ACE-10, at the beginning of your comments. You may also
submit comments through the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov. You may

review the public docket containing the direct final rule, any comments
received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1-800-647-5527) is on the ground
level of the building at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Grant Nichols, System Support, DOT
Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901
Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Direct Final Rule Procedure

    The FAA anticipates that this regulation will not result in adverse
or negative comment and, therefore, is issuing it as a direct final
rule. Previous actions of this nature have not been controversial and
have not resulted in adverse comments or objections. Unless a written
adverse or negative comment or a written notice of intent to submit an
adverse or negative comment is received within the comment period, the
regulation will become effective on the date specified above. After the
close of the comment period, the FAA will publish a document in the
Federal Register indicating that no adverse or negative comments were
received and confirming the date on which the final rule will become
effective. If the FAA does receive, within the comment period, and
adverse or negative comment, or written notice of intent to submit such
a comment, a document withdrawing the direct final rule will be
published in the Federal Register, and a notice of proposed rulemaking
may be published with a new comment period.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this rulemaking by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and
suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned
regulatory decisions on the direct final rule. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the direct final rule.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2007-28776/
Airspace Docket No. 07-ACE-10.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.

The Rule

    This action amends the Class E airspace area at Lee's Summit
Municipal Airport, MO, by correcting the ARP for Lee's Summit Municipal
Airport, Lee's Summit, MO. Class E airspace areas extending upward from
700 feet or more above the surface of the earth are published in
Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9P, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated September 1, 2006, and effective September 15,
2006, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.
    The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation is noncontroversial and
unlikely to result in adverse or negative comments. For the reasons
discussed in the preamble, I certify that this regulation (1) is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is
not a ``significant rule'' under Department of Transportation (DOT)
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact,
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure that safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
since it contains aircraft executing instrument approach procedures to
Lee's Summit Municipal Airport, MO.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 71
as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9P, dated September 1, 2006, and effective
September 15, 2006, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ACE MO E5 Lee's Summit, MO [Amended]

Lee's Summit Municipal Airport, MO
    (Lat. 38[deg]57'35'' N., long. 94[deg]22'17'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7-mile radius of Lee's Summit Municipal Airport.

* * * * *

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 8, 2007.
Walter Tweedy,
Team Manager, System Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 07-4323 Filed 9-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 233 (Monday, December 5, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 87494-87496]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28631]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-9432; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-116-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 737-800, -900, and -900ER series
airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports indicating in-
flight valve failure of the left temperature control valve and control
cabin trim air modulating valve. This proposed AD would require
replacing the left temperature control valve and control cabin trim air
modulating valve. We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 19,
2017.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS),
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also
available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-9432.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9432; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley Chen, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-9432;
Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-116-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We have received reports indicating in-flight valve failure of the
left temperature control valve and control cabin trim air modulating
valve. These valves can fail in their open positions causing elevated
temperatures in the flight deck or the passenger cabin during cruise.
Operators have reported events where they were unable to control the
flight deck and passenger cabin temperatures during cruise. This
condition, if not corrected, could result in temperatures in excess of
100 degrees Fahrenheit in the flight deck or the passenger cabin during
cruise, which

could lead to the impairment of the flightcrew and consequent risk of
loss of continued safe flight and landing. Such elevated temperatures
could result in diverted flights since the flight deck door cannot be
opened for an extended time during cruise. Airplanes on extended
operation routes are most at risk because they can be 3 hours away from
the nearest airport.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-21A1203, dated June
8, 2016. The service information describes procedures for replacing the
left temperature control valve and control cabin trim air modulating
valve, part number 398908-4, with new part number 398908-3 or 398908-5.
This service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously. For information on the
procedures and compliance times, see this service information at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9432.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 319 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
             Action                     Labor cost           Parts cost     Cost per product       operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement of valves..........  9 work-hours x $85 per           $4,800   $5,565 per          $1,775,235 per
                                  hour = $765 per                           replacement.        replacement.
                                  replacement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2016-9432; Directorate Identifier
2016-NM-116-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by January 19, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-800, -900, and -
900ER series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-21A1203, dated June 8, 2016.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 21, Air
conditioning.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports indicating in-flight valve
failure of the left temperature control valve and control cabin trim
air modulating valve. We are issuing this AD to prevent temperatures
in excess of 100 degrees Fahrenheit in the flight deck or the
passenger cabin during cruise, which could lead to the impairment of
the flightcrew and consequent risk of loss of continued safe flight
and landing.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Replacement of the Left Temperature Control Valve and Control Cabin
Trim Air Modulating Valve

    Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, replace
the left temperature control valve and control cabin trim air
modulating valve, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-21A1203, dated June 8, 2016.

(h) Parts Installation Prohibition

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a
temperature control valve, part number 398908-4, on either the left
temperature control valve location or the control cabin trim air
modulating valve location on any Model 737-800, -900, or -900ER
airplane.

(i) Exception to the Service Information

    Where paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-21A1203, dated June 8, 2016, specifies a compliance
time ``after the original issue date of this service bulletin,''
this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance time
after the effective date of this AD.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. To be approved, the
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs
(j)(4)(i) and (j)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.

(k) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact: Stanley Chen,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch,
ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:
425-917-6590; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 17, 2016.
Phil Forde,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-28631 Filed 12-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: August 20, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 161)]
[Notices]
[Page 51467-51468]
[DOCID:fr20au10-53]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0423]

ASK (Assess Specific Kinds of CHILDREN Challenges for Neurologic
Devices) Study Children Workshop; Public Workshop; Request for Comments

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice of public workshop; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a public
workshop entitled ASK (Assess Specific Kinds of CHILDREN Challenges for
Neurologic Devices) Study Children Workshop. The purpose of the public
workshop is to solicit comments from academic investigators and
clinicians associated with the use, research and/or development of
pediatric neuroprostheses regarding approaches for enhancing the
protection and promotion of public health in children and adolescents
with neuroprostheses. The public workshop will provide an overview of
pediatric initiatives across the Agency, neurological and neurosurgical
perspectives on medical devices, a review of pediatric assessments and
outcome measures, and scientific research issues associated with the
use of neuroprotheses in pediatric populations, including cochlear
implants, deep brain stimulators, hydrocephalus shunts, spinal cord
stimulators, and vagus nerve stimulators. Information from this public
workshop will help establish a science-based framework of
recommendations to aid in the development of more efficient strategies
in evaluating pediatric neuroprostheses regulated by the Agency.
    Dates and Time: The public workshop will be held on September 13,
2010, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: The public workshop will be held at FDA White Oak Campus,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, Conference Center, rm. 1503, Silver
Spring, MD 20993. For lodging and directions, please refer to the
meeting on the Internet at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/
NewsEvents/WorkshopsConferences/default.htm.
    Contact Person: Carlos Pe[ntilde]a, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, rm. 4264, Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Registration: Registration requests must be received by 5 p.m. on
September 6, 2010. If you wish to attend the public meeting, you must
register online at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/NewsEvents/
WorkshopsConferences/default.htm. There is no registration fee for the
public workshop. Early registration is recommended because seating is
limited. There will be no onsite registration.
    If you wish to make an oral presentation at the workshop, you must
indicate this at the time of registration. FDA will do its best to
accommodate requests to speak. Individuals and organizations with
common interests are urged to consolidate or coordinate their
presentations, and to request time for a joint presentation. FDA will
determine the amount of time allotted to each presenter and the
approximate time that each oral presentation is scheduled to begin.
    If you wish to make an oral presentation during the open comment
period at the workshop, you must indicate this at the time of
registration. FDA requests that presentations focus on the areas
described in this notice. You should also identify which discussion
topic you wish to address in

your presentation and you must submit a brief statement that describes
your experience and/or expertise relevant to your proposed
presentation. In order to keep each open session focused on the
discussion topic at hand, each oral presentation should address only
one discussion topic. FDA will do its best to accommodate requests to
speak.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability (such as
wheelchair access or a sign language interpreter), please notify Carlos
Pe[ntilde]a, at least 7 days in advance of the meeting.
    Comments: FDA is holding this public workshop to obtain information
about children and adolescents with neuroprostheses. The deadline for
submitting comments regarding this public workshop is September 6,
2010.
    Regardless of attendance at the public workshop, interested persons
may submit either electronic or written comments regarding this
document. Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville MD 20852. It is only necessary to send one set of comments.
It is no longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments.
Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Why Are We Holding This Public Workshop?

    The purpose of the public workshop is to solicit information from
academic investigators and clinicians associated with the use, research
and/or development of pediatric neuroprostheses regarding approaches
for enhancing the protection and promotion of public health in children
and adolescents with neuroprostheses. Information from this public
workshop will help establish a science-based framework of
recommendations to aid in the development of more efficient strategies
in evaluating pediatric neuroprostheses regulated by the Agency.
    The agency seeks discussion with interested parties regarding the
use of neuroprostheses in pediatric populations. The public workshop
will provide an overview of pediatric initiatives across the Agency,
neurological and neurosurgical perspectives on medical devices, a
review of pediatric assessments and outcome measures, and scientific
research issues associated with the use of neuroprotheses in pediatric
populations, including cochlear implants, deep brain stimulators,
hydrocephalus shunts, spinal cord stimulators, and vagus nerve
stimulators.
    Since the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 was
signed into law, there has been increased interest in stimulating
scientifically sound clinical research related to pediatric
populations. However, to date, none of the initiatives has focused
specifically on neuroprosthetic devices for pediatric patients. It is
hoped that this meeting will provide a forum for open discussion and
information exchange among interested parties, FDA, and other
stakeholders to lay a framework for establishing a science-based
framework of recommendations to aid in the development of more
efficient strategies in evaluating pediatric neuroprostheses regulated
by the Agency and stimulating further research into the use of devices
to treat disorders and diseases that affect pediatric patients.

II. What Will Be the Format for the Meeting?

    The format for the meeting will include general sessions in the
morning and the afternoon. Invited expert speakers will present
information to stimulate thought regarding current needs and concerns
regarding neuroprosthetic devices that involve pediatric patients.
Presentations will be followed by a focused, moderated comment session.

III. What Are the General Topic Areas We Intend To Address at the
Public Workshop?

    We hope to discuss the following topics:
     Pediatric initiatives across the Agency
     The ASK Children Study
     Clinical perspectives
     Patient and advocacy group perspectives
     Science and research perspectives
    The workshop will conclude with an overall open discussion that
will cover the workshop purposes and questions, areas of cooperation,
next steps, and future directions.

IV. What Are the Issues That Will Be Discussed and Considered?

    Issues regarding the research and/or development of pediatric
neuroprostheses, current clinical use, and approaches for enhancing the
protection and promotion of public health in children and adolescents
with neuroprostheses will be discussed and considered.

V. Where Can I Find Out More About This Public Workshop?

    Background information on the public workshop, registration
information, the agenda, information about lodging, and other relevant
information will be posted, as it becomes available, on the Internet
at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/NewsEvents/WorkshopsConferences/
default.htm.
    Transcripts: Transcripts of the public workshop may be requested in
writing from the Freedom of Information Office (HFI-35), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, rm. 6-30, Rockville, MD 20857,
approximately 15 working days after the public workshop at a cost of 10
cents per page. A transcript of the public workshop will be available
on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/NewsEvents/
WorkshopsConferences/default.htm.

    Dated: August 16, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-20659 Filed 8-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 193 (Tuesday, October 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 60432]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25404]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Ninety-Fourth Meeting: Special Committee (159) Global Positioning
System (GPS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of ninety-fourth Special Committee 159 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the
ninety-fourth Special Committee 159 meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 19th-23rd from 9:00 a.m.-5:00
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, Tel:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org or
Harold Moses, Program Director, RTCA, Inc<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(202) 330-
0654.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 159. The agenda will
include the following:

Monday, October 19, 2015

1. All Day, Working Group 2, GPS/WAAS, MacIntosh-NBAA Room and Colson
Board Rooms

Tuesday, October 20, 2015

1. All Day, Working Group 4, GPS/Precision Landing, MacIntosh-NBAA Room
2. All Day, Working Group 2C, GPS/Inertial, A4A & ARINC Room
3. Morning--9:00-12:00/Noon p.m., Working Group 2A, GPS/GLONASS, Colson
Board Room

Wednesday, October 21, 2015

1. All Day, Working Group 4, GPS/Precision Landing, MacIntosh-NBAA and
Colson Board Room
2. All Day, Working Group 2C, GPS/Inertial, A4A & ARINC Rooms

Thursday, October 22, 2015

1. All Day, Working Group 4, GPS/GPS/Precision Landing Guidance
MacIntosh-NBAA Room
2. Morning--9:00-12:00/Noon p.m., Working Group 2C, GPS/Inertial, A4A
and ARINC Rooms
3. Morning--9:00-12:00/Noon p.m., Working Group 7, GPS/Antennas, Colson
Board Room
4. Afternoon--1:00-5:00 p.m. Working Group 6, GPS/Interference, A4A and
ARINC Rooms

Friday, October 23, 2015

5. PLENARY SESSION
    a. Chairman's Introductory Remarks.
    b. Approval of Summary of the Ninety-Third Meeting held March 20,
2015, RTCA Paper No. 076-15/SC159-1037.
    c. Review Working Group (WG) Progress and Identify Issues for
Resolution.
    i. GPS/3nd Civil Frequency (WG-1)
    ii. GPS/WAAS (WG-2)
    iii. GPS/GLONASS (WG-2A)
    iv. GPS/Inertial (WG-2C)
    v. GPS/Precision Landing Guidance (WG-4)
    vi. GPS/Airport Surface Surveillance (WG-5)
    vii. GPS/Interference (WG-6)
    viii. GPS/Antennas (WG-7)
    d. Review of EUROCAE Activities.
    e. Response to EASA--Deviation Request ETSO-C145c--Review
    f. SC-159 Terms of Reference--PMC approved June 18, 2015--Review
    g. Briefing--FAA GNSS Intentional Interference and Spoofing Study
Team (GIISST)
    h. Assignment/Review of Future Work.
    i. Other Business.
    j. Date and Place of Next Meeting.
    k. Adjourn.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 30, 2015.
Latasha Robinson,
Management & Program Analyst, Next Generation, Enterprise Support
Services Division, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-25404 Filed 10-5-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: November 8, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 216)]
[Notices]
[Page 65548-65549]
[DOCID:fr08no06-119]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon written request, copies available from: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.

Extension:
    Rule 17i-2; SEC File No. 270-528; OMB Control No. 3235-0592.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a
request for extension of the previously approved collection of
information discussed below.
    Section 231 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 \1\ (the
``GLBA'') amended Section 17 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'' or the ``Exchange Act'') to create a regulatory framework
under which a holding company of a broker-dealer (``investment bank
holding company'' or ``IBHC'') may voluntarily be supervised by the
Commission as a supervised investment bank holding company (or
``SIBHC'').\2\ In 2004, the Commission promulgated rules, including
Rule 17i-2 (17 CFR 240.17i-2) to create a framework for the Commission
to supervise SIBHCs.\3\ This framework includes qualification criteria
for SIBHCs, as well as recordkeeping and reporting requirements. Among
other things, this regulatory framework for SIBHCs is intended to
provide a basis for non-U.S. financial regulators to treat the
Commission as the principal U.S. consolidated, home-country supervisor
\4\ for SIBHCs and their affiliated broker-dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Pub. L. No. 106-102, 113 Stat. 1338 (1999).
    \2\ See 15 U.S.C. 78q(i).
    \3\ See Exchange Act Release No. 49831 (Jun. 8, 2004), 69 FR
34472 (Jun. 21, 2004).
    \4\ See H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 106-434, 165 (1999). See also
Exchange Act Release No. 49831, at 6 (Jun. 8, 2004), 69 FR 34472, at
34473 (Jun. 21, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 17i-2 provides the method by which an IBHC can elect to become
an SIBHC. In addition, Rule 17i-2 indicates that the IBHC will
automatically become an SIBHC 45 days after the Commission receives its
completed Notice of Intention unless the Commission issues an order
indicating either that it will begin its supervision sooner or that it
does not believe it to be necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
Section 17 of the Act for the IBHC to be so supervised. Finally, Rule
17i-2 sets forth the criteria the Commission would use to make this
determination.
    The collections of information required by Rule 17i-2 are necessary
to allow the Commission to effectively determine whether supervision of
an IBHC as an SIBHC is necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of Section 17 of the Act. In addition, these collections are
needed so that the Commission can adequately supervise the activities
of these SIBHCs. Finally, these rules enhance the Commission's
supervision of the SIBHCs' subsidiary broker-dealers through collection
of additional information and inspections of affiliates of those
broker-dealers.
    We estimate that three IBHCs will file Notices of Intention with
the Commission to be supervised by the Commission as SIBHCs. Each IBHC
that files a Notice of Intention to become supervised by the Commission
as an SIBHC will require approximately 900 hours to draft the Notice of
Intention, compile the various documents to be included with the Notice
of Intention, and work with the Commission staff. Further, each IBHC
likely will have an attorney review its Notice of Intention and it will
take the attorney approximately 100 hours to complete such a review.
Consequently, we estimate the total one-time burden for all three firms
to file their Notices of Intention would be approximately 3,000
hours.\5 \Rule 17i-2 also requires that an IBHC/SIBHC update its Notice
of Intention on an ongoing basis.\6\ Each IBHC/SIBHC will require
approximately two hours each month to update its Notice of Intention,
as necessary. Thus, we estimate that it will take the three

IBHC/SIBHCs, in the aggregate, about 72 hours each year to update their
Notices of Intention.\7\ Thus, the total burden relating to Rule 17i-2
for all SIBHCs would be approximately 3,072 hours in the first year,\8\
and approximately 72 hours each year thereafter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ (900 hours + 100 hours) x 3 IBHCs/SIBHCs = 3,000 hours.
    \6\ An IBHC would be required to review and update its Notice of
Intention to the extent it becomes inaccurate prior to a Commission
determination, and an SIBHC would be required to update its Notice
of Intention if it changes a mathematical model used to calculate
its risk allowances pursuant to Rule 17i-7 after a Commission
determination was made.
    \7\ (2 hours x 12 months each year) x 3 SIBHCs = 72.
    \8\ (3,000 hours to file the Notices of Intention + 72 hours to
update them) = first year cost of 3,072.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The records required to be created pursuant to Rule 17i-2 must be
preserved for a period of not less than three years.\9\ The collection
of information is mandatory and the information required to be provided
to the Commission pursuant to this Rule is deemed confidential pursuant
to section 17(j) of the Exchange Act and Section 552(b)(3)(B) of the
Freedom of Information Act,\10\ notwithstanding any other provision of
law. In addition, Exchange Act Rule 17i-2(d)(1) \11\ states that all
Notices of Intention, amendments, and other documentation and
information filed pursuant to Rule 17i-2 will be accorded confidential
treatment to the extent permitted by law.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 240.17i-5(b)(2).
    \10\ 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3)(B).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.17i-2(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    Comments should be directed to: (i) the Desk Officer for the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New
Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503 or send an e-mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief

Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an e-
mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB within
30 days of this notice.

     October 23, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-18792 Filed 11-7-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: September 19, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 181)]
[Notices]
[Page 53579-53580]
[DOCID:fr19se07-82]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2007- 0086; FRL-8147-7]

Implementation of the Emerging Pathogens and Disinfection
Hierarchy for Antimicrobial Products; Notice of Availability; Reopening
of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Reopening of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is reopening the comment period for a notice of
availability concerning implementation of the emerging pathogens and
disinfection hierarchy guidance for antimicrobial products published in
the Federal Register of July 25, 2007. This document reopens the
comment period for an additional 60 days. The comment period is
reopened because additional time has been requested by several
pesticide entities to prepare detailed comments on the planned
implementation.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 19, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES in
the notice of availability published in the Federal Register of July
25, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Bailey, Antimicrobials Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(703) 308-6212; fax number: (703) 308-

6467; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    The Agency identified in the notice of availability those who may
be potentially affected by that action. If you have questions regarding
the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?

    To submit comments, or access the public docket, follow the
detailed instructions provided in the Unit entitled, ``ADDRESSES'' and
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION of the July 25, 2007 notice of
availability.

II. What Action is EPA Taking?

    This document reopens the comment period established in a notice
published in the Federal Register of July 25, 2007 (72 FR 40879) (FRL-
8134-2). In that document, the Agency announced the availability of and
solicited comments on the pesticide draft science guidance document
entitled ``Implementation of the Emerging Pathogens and Disinfection
Hierarchy for Antimicrobial Products.'' The guidance proposes to
utilize an organism hierarchy to identify effective products for use
with emerging pathogens and to permit registrants, in accordance with
EPA regulations, to make limited label statements regarding product
efficacy against such pathogens. The guidance applies to emerging
enveloped and non-enveloped viruses and may be implemented after the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has identified the taxonomic
genera of the emerging virus. Limitations, label recommendations and
the process for implementation are discussed in detail in the
supporting guidance document. The supporting implementation guidance is
available in the docket at http://www.regulations.gov, document ID No.

EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0086. EPA is reopening the comment period, which
expired on August 24, 2007, for an additional 60 days. The new comment
period ends on November 19, 2007.

III. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?

    Provisions are made in the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended, to allow a public comment period.
However, the Administrator may extend the comment period if additional
time for comment is requested. In this case, the Innovation Reform
Group (IRG), the American Chemistry Council Biocides Panel (Panel), and
the Consumer Specialty Products Association (CSPA) have requested
additional time to develop comments. The Agency believes that an
additional 60 days is warranted.

List of Subjects

     Environmental protection, Pesticide and pests, Disinfection
hierarchy, Emerging pathogens, Antimicrobial products.

    Dated: September 6, 2007.
Frank Sanders,
Director, Antimicrobials Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E7-18372 Filed 9-18-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24182-24183]
[FR Doc No: 2023-08275]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]

Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public Notice

    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of
the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission
decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt off-
the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested
proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of
the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any
oral communication.
    Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional
file associated with, but not a part of, the decisional record of the
proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited
communication and any responses thereto should become a part of the
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication and may
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant
such a request only when it determines that fairness so requires. Any
person identified below as having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable proceeding in accordance with
Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
    Exempt off-the-record communications are included in the decisional
record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e) (1) (v).
    The following is a list of off-the-record communications recently
received by the Secretary of the Commission. This filing may be viewed
on the Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary
link. Enter the docket number, excluding the last three digits, in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, please
contact FERC Online Support at [email protected] or toll free
at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Docket Nos.                    File date                  Presenter or requester
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prohibited:
    1. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000.    3-29-2023  FERC Staff.\1\
    2. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000.    3-29-2023  FERC Staff.\2\
    3. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000.    3-29-2023  FERC Staff.\3\
    4. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000 ,CP19-477-000.    3-29-2023  FERC Staff.\4\
    5. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000.    3-29-2023  FERC Staff.\5\
    6. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000.    3-29-2023  FERC Staff.\6\
    7. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000.    3-30-2023  FERC Staff.\7\
    8. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000.    3-30-2023  FERC Staff.\8\
    9. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000.    3-30-2023  FERC Staff.\9\
    10. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000    3-30-2023  FERC Staff.\10\
    11. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000    3-30-2023  FERC Staff.\11\

    12. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000    3-30-2023  FERC Staff.\12\
    13. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000    3-30-2023  FERC Staff.\13\
    14. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000    3-30-2023  FERC Staff.\14\
    15. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000    3-30-2023  FERC Staff.\15\
    16. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000    3-30-2023  FERC Staff.\16\
    17. CP21-57-000, CP16-10-000, CP19-477-000    3-30-2023  FERC Staff.\17\
    18. CP16-454-000, CP16-455-000, CP16-16-      4-10-2023  FERC Staff.\18\
     000.
    19. CP16-454-000, CP21-465-001, CP21-465-     4-10-2023  FERC Staff.\19\
     002.
Exempt:
    1. P-14513-003............................    3-30-2023  Idaho State Historic Preservation Office.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Emailed comments dated 3/29/23 from Isabella Musa and 25 other individuals.
\2\ Emailed comments dated 3/29/23 from William Carbley and 27 other individuals.
\3\ Emailed comments dated 3/29/23 from Robin Hordon and 24 other individuals.
\4\ Emailed comments dated 3/29/23 from Brian Reardon and 24 other individuals.
\5\ Emailed comments dated 3/29/23 from Kelsey Brodt and 24 other individuals.
\6\ Emailed comments dated 3/29/23 from Naomi W and 14 other individuals.
\7\ Emailed comments dated 3/29/23 from Aaron Weaver and 29 other individuals.
\8\ Emailed comments dated 3/29/23 from Carrie Gleason and 29 other individuals.
\9\ Emailed comments dated 3/29/23 from Lexi Nutkiewicz and 29 other individuals.
\10\ Emailed comments dated 3/29/23 from Reegan Burns and 29 other individuals.
\11\ Emailed comments dated 3/29/23 from Victoria Crawford and 28 other individuals.
\12\ Emailed comments dated 3/30/23 from Alyssia Gross and 24 other individuals.
\13\ Emailed comments dated 3/30/23 from Jessica Lifford and 9 other individuals.
\14\ Emailed comments dated 3/30/23 from Alisia Bowling Gonzalez and 8 other individuals.
\15\ Emailed comments dated 3/30/23 from Tiffany Smith and 20 other individuals.
\16\ Emailed comments dated 3/30/23 from Matt Cutts and 24 other individuals.
\17\ Emailed comments dated 3/30/23 from Janine Vinton and 29 other individuals.
\18\ Memorandum regarding ex parte communications on 3/8/23 with Bekah Hinojosa and Christopher Basaldu.
\19\ Emailed comments dated 4/10/23 from Trevor Falk.

    Dated: April 13, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-08275 Filed 4-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P