[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65389-65390]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26154]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP15-65-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.312: General Section 4
Rate Case to be effective 12/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/24/14.
    Accession Number: 20141024-5086.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/5/14.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but

intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP14-916-001.
    Applicants: Clear Creek Storage Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Clear Creek Compliance
Filing to be effective 10/16/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/24/14.
    Accession Number: 20141024-5029.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/5/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-917-001.
    Applicants: Rendezvous Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Rendezvous Compliance
Filing to be effective 10/16/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/24/14.
    Accession Number: 20141024-5032.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/5/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-952-001.
    Applicants: Destin Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Show Cause Compliance
Refiling to be effective 10/16/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/24/14.
    Accession Number: 20141024-5155.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/5/14.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 27, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-26154 Filed 11-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 68237]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21793]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-98568; File No. SR-BOX-2023-20]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Notice of
Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule
Change To Adopt Rules To Govern FLEX Equity Options and a New Order
Type To Trade FLEX Equity Options on the BOX Trading Floor

September 27, 2023.
    On September 1, 2023, BOX Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')
\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to adopt Rules
5055 and 7605 which, among other applicable rules, will govern the
trading of flexible exchange equity options (``FLEX Equity Options'')
on the BOX Trading Floor, and make related changes to Rules 100
(Definitions), 7620 (Accommodation Transactions), and 12140 (Imposition
of Fines for Minor Rule Violations). The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal Register on September 19, 2023.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98380 (September 13,
2023), 88 FR 64482.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that, within 45 days of
the publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding, or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is November 3, 2023. The Commission is extending this 45-day time
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer
period within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that
it has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change.
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\5\ designates December 18, 2023, as the date by which the
Commission shall either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings
to determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No.
SR-BOX-2023-20).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-21793 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9216-9217]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03381]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0086]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Potential Tobacco Product Violations Reporting Form

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on the collection of information
contained in FDA's Tobacco Product Violations Reporting Form.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by April 21, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville,
MD 20850<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

Potential Tobacco Product Violations Reporting Form--(OMB Control
Number 0910-0716)--Extension

    On June 22, 2009, the President signed the Family Smoking
Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the Tobacco Control Act) (Pub. L.
111-31) into law. The Tobacco Control Act amended section 201 et seq.
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
321 et seq.) by adding a new chapter granting FDA important new
authority to regulate the manufacture, marketing, and distribution of
tobacco products to protect the public health generally and to reduce
tobacco use by minors. FDA is requesting an extension of OMB approval
for the collection of information to accept consumer and other
stakeholder feedback and notification of potential violations of the
FD&C Act, as amended by the Tobacco Control Act.
    FDA created a Tobacco Call Center (with a toll-free number: 1-877-
CTP-1373). Callers are able to report potential violations of the
Tobacco Control Act, and FDA will conduct targeted followup
investigations based on information received. When callers report a
violation, the caller will be asked to provide as much certain
information as they can recall, including: The date the potential
violation occurred; product type (e.g., cigarette, smokeless, roll-
your-own); tobacco brand; potential violation type; type of potentially
violative promotional materials; who potentially violated; and the
name, address, phone number, and email address of the potential
violator. The caller will also be asked to list the potential
violator's Web site (if available), describe the potential violation,
and provide any additional files or information pertinent to the
potential violation.
    FDA currently provides a form that may be used to solicit this
information from the caller (Form FDA 3779, Potential Tobacco Product
Violations Report), and seeks renewal of Form FDA 3779. This form is
posted on FDA's Web site. The public and interested stakeholders are
also able to report information regarding possible violations of the
Tobacco Control Act through the following methods: Calling the Tobacco
Call Center using the Center for Tobacco Products' (CTP) toll-free
number; using a fillable Form FDA 3779 found on FDA's Web site;
downloading a PDF version of the form to send via email or mail to FDA;
requesting a copy of Form FDA 3779 by contacting CTP and sending by
mail to FDA; and sending a letter to FDA's CTP. The public and
interested stakeholders will also be able to report information
regarding possible violations of the Tobacco Control Act in the future
using FDA's tobacco violation reporting smartphone application.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                 Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    No. of
  Activity and Form FDA 3779        No. of       Responses per   Total annual    Average burden     Total hours
                                  Respondents     respondent       responses      per response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reporting violations of the                400               2             800  0.25 (15                     200
 FD&C Act, as amended by the                                                     minutes).
 Tobacco Control Act, by
 telephone, Internet form,
 mail, smartphone application,
 or email..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.

    FDA estimates that submitting the information (by telephone,
Internet, mail, smartphone application, or email) will take 0.25 hours
(i.e., 15 minutes) per response. FDA estimates the number of annual
respondents to this collection of information will be 400, who will
each submit 2 reports by telephone, Internet, mail, smartphone
application, or email. This estimate is based on the rate of reporting
through Form FDA 3779, reports received from FDA's toll-free telephone
number and email address, and FDA experience. Each report is expected
to take 0.25 hours to complete and submit; therefore, total burden
hours for this collection of information is estimated to be 200 hours
(800 responses x 0.25 hours per response). The total burden hours for
this collection have decreased by 50 hours (from 250 to 200) because
the number of estimated respondents decreased from 1,000 to 400, and
the annual responses are expected to drop from 1,000 to 800 annually.
Based on past submissions to FDA, the number of estimated annual
respondents is expected to decrease from 1,000 to 400 and each
respondent's number of submissions is expected to increase from 1 to 2
annually. Therefore, the number of responses are expected to decrease
from 1,000 to 800 annually (400 respondents x 2 responses).

    Dated: February 10, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-03381 Filed 2-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 152 (Monday, August 8, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52326-52329]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18070]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Part 774

[Docket No. 160303184-6184-01]
RIN 0694-AG90

Amendment to the Export Administration Regulations To Add Targets
for the Production of Tritium and Related Development and Production
Technology to the List of 0Y521 Series

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this interim final rule, the Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS) amends the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to
make certain items subject to the EAR and to impose on those items a
license requirement for export and reexport to all destinations, except
Canada. Specifically, this rule classifies certain specified targets
``specially designed'' for the production of tritium and related
``development'' and ``production'' technology under Export Control
Classification Numbers (ECCNs) 0A521 and 0E521, respectively, on the
Commerce Control List (CCL). As described in the final rule that
established the 0Y521 series and that was published in the Federal
Register on April 13, 2012, items are added to the 0Y521 series upon a
determination by the Department of Commerce, with the concurrence of
the Departments of Defense and State, and other agencies as
appropriate, that the items should be controlled for export because the
items provide at least a significant military or intelligence advantage
to the United States or foreign policy reasons justify control. In this
matter, the Department of Energy also concurred in the control imposed.
The items identified in this rule are controlled for regional stability
(RS) Column 1 reasons. The only license exception available for these
items is for exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) made by or
consigned to a department or agency of the U.S. Government.

DATES: This rule is effective August 8, 2016. Comments must be received
by October 7, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
The identification number for this rulemaking is BIS-2016-0027.
     By email directly to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Include
RIN 0694-AG90 in the subject line.
     By mail or delivery to Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau
of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 2099B, 14th
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. Refer to RIN
0694-AG90.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Clagett, Director, Nuclear and
Missile Technology Controls Division, Office of Nonproliferation and
Treaty Compliance, by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email at
Steven.Clagett@bis doc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    BIS established the ECCN 0Y521 series to identify items that
warrant control on the CCL but are not yet identified in an existing
ECCN (77 FR 22191, April 13, 2012). Items are added to the ECCN 0Y521
series by the Department of Commerce, with the concurrence of the
Departments of Defense and State, and other agencies as appropriate,
upon a determination that an item should be controlled because it
provides at least a significant military or intelligence advantage to
the United States or because foreign policy reasons justify such
control. In this matter, the Department of Energy also concurred in the
control imposed. The ECCN 0Y521 series is a temporary holding
classification with a limitation that while an item is temporarily
classified under ECCN 0Y521, the U.S. Government works to adopt a
control through the relevant multilateral regime(s), in this case the
Nuclear Suppliers Group, to determine an appropriate longer-term
control over the item, or that the item does not warrant control on the
CCL.
    Items classified under ECCN 0Y521, including the items identified
in this interim final rule as 0A521 and 0E521 items, remain so-
classified for one year from the date a final rule identifying the item
is published in the Federal Register amending the EAR, unless the item
is re-classified under a different ECCN, under an EAR99 designation, or
the 0Y521 classification is extended. During this time, the U.S.
Government determines whether it is appropriate to submit a proposed
control to the applicable export control regime (e.g., the Nuclear
Suppliers Group) for potential multilateral control, with the
understanding that multilateral controls are preferable when practical.
An item's ECCN 0Y521 classification may be extended for two one-year
periods to provide time for the U.S. Government and multilateral
regime(s) to reach agreement on controls for the item, and provided
that the U.S. Government has submitted a proposal to obtain
multilateral controls over the item. Further extension beyond three
years may occur only if the Under Secretary for Industry and Security
makes a determination that such extension is in the national security
or foreign policy interests of the United States. An extension or re-
extension, including a determination by the Under Secretary for
Industry and Security, will be published in the Federal Register.

License Requirements, Policies and Exceptions

    The license requirements and policies for the ECCN 0Y521 series
appear in Sec.  742.6(a)(7) of the EAR. ECCN 0Y521 items are subject to
a nearly worldwide license requirement (i.e., for every country except
Canada) with a case-by-case license review policy, through regional
stability (RS Column 1) controls. The description and status of ECCN
0Y521 items appear in Supplement No. 5 to part 774 of the EAR, along
with any item-specific license exceptions, where applicable. Unless
otherwise indicated, License Exception GOV is the only license
exception available and is applicable to all ECCN 0Y521 series items,
including those items identified in this notice, if the item is within
the scope of Sec.  740.11(b)(2)(ii) (Exports, reexports, and transfers
(in-country) made by or consigned to a department or agency of the U.S.
Government), as provided in Sec.  740.2(a)(14).

Addition of ECCN 0A521 and 0E521 Items: Targets for the Production of
Tritium and Related ``Development'' and ``Production'' Technology

    In this rule, BIS amends the EAR to make targets made of or
containing lithium ``specially designed'' for the production of tritium
by insertion in the core of a nuclear reactor and related
``development'' and ``production'' technology subject to the EAR and
imposes a license requirement on the items. These items are being added
to the 0Y521 series pursuant to a determination by the Department of
Commerce, with the concurrence of the Departments of Defense, State and
Energy, that the items should be controlled because they provide a
significant military or intelligence advantage to the United States or
because foreign policy reasons justify such controls.
    ECCN 0A521 No. 1, which appears in the table found in Supplement
No. 5 to part 774 of the EAR, covers targets made of or containing
lithium ``specially designed'' for the production of tritium by
insertion in the core of a nuclear reactor.
    ECCN 0E521 No. 1 covers technology required for the ``development''
or ``production'' of items classified under ECCN 0A521 No. 1.

License Applications for the New ECCN 0A521 and 0E521 Items

    License applications for these items may be submitted through SNAP-
R in accordance with Sec.  748.6 of the EAR. Exporters are directed to
include detailed descriptions and technical specifications with the
license application, and identify the item's ECCN.
    The rule is being issued in interim final form because while the
government believes that it is in the national security interests of
the United States to immediately implement these controls, it also
wants to provide the interested public with an opportunity to comment
on the new controls of the items. Comments may be submitted in
accordance with the DATES and ADDRESSES sections of this rule. BIS will
review and, if appropriate, address such comments through rulemaking
consistent with the process described in the April 13, 2012 final rule
creating the ECCN 0Y521 series (77 FR 22191).

Export Administration Act

    Although the Export Administration Act expired on August 20, 2001,
the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR,
2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by Executive Order 13637 of March
8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and as extended by the Notice of
August 7, 2015, 80 FR 48233 (August 11, 2015), has continued the Export
Administration Regulations in effect under the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to carry out the provisions of the
Export Administration Act, as appropriate and to the extent permitted
by law, pursuant to Executive Order 13222 as amended by Executive Order
13637.

Rulemaking Requirements

    1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory

alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety effects, distribute impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
    2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to, nor is subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with, a collection of information, subject to the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB
control number. This rule affects two approved collections: (1) The
Simplified Network Application Processing + System (control number
0694-0088), which carries a burden hour estimate of 43.8 minutes,
including the time necessary to submit license applications, among
other things, as well as miscellaneous and other recordkeeping
activities that account for 12 minutes per submission; and (2) License
Exceptions and Exclusions (0694-0137). BIS does not believe that this
rule will materially increase the number of submissions under these
collections.
    3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined under E.O. 13132.
    4. The provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) requiring prior notice, the opportunity for public comment and a
delay in effective date are inapplicable because this regulation
involves a military or foreign affairs function of the United States
(See 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). BIS, with the concurrence of the U.S.
Departments of Defense and State, is implementing this rule because the
items identified for the ECCN 0Y521 series in this rule provide a
significant military or intelligence advantage to the United States.
Immediate imposition of a license requirement is necessary to effect
the national security and foreign policy goals of this rule. Immediate
implementation will allow BIS to prevent exports of these items to
users and for uses that pose a national security threat to the United
States or its allies. If BIS delayed this rule to allow for prior
notice and opportunity for public comment, the resulting delay in
implementation would afford an opportunity for the export of these
items to users and uses that pose such a national security threat,
thereby undermining the purpose of the rule. In addition, if parties
receive notice of the U.S. Government's intention to control these
items under 0Y521 once a final rule was published, they might have an
incentive to either accelerate orders of these items or attempt to have
the items exported prior to the imposition of the control.
    Further, BIS finds good cause to waive the 30-day delay in
effectiveness under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). Immediate implementation of
these changes will allow BIS to prevent exports of these items to users
and for uses that pose a national security threat to the United States
or its allies. If BIS delayed this rule to allow for a 30-day delay in
effectiveness, the resulting delay in implementation would afford an
opportunity for the export of these items to users and uses that pose
such a national security threat, thereby undermining the purpose of the
rule. Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment are not required to be given for this rule by 5 U.S.C.
553, or by any other law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly,
no regulatory flexibility analysis is required and none has been
prepared. Although notice and opportunity for comment are not required,
BIS is issuing this rule as an interim final rule with a request for
comments. All comments must be in writing and submitted via one or more
of the methods listed under the ADDRESSES caption to this notice. All
comments (including any personal identifiable information) will be
available for public inspection and copying. Those wishing to comment
anonymously may do so by submitting their comment via regulations.gov
and leaving the fields for identifying information blank.

List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 774

    Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Accordingly, part 774 of the Export Administration Regulations (15
CFR parts 730-774) is amended as follows:

PART 774--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 774 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C. 7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c, 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42 U.S.C. 6212; 15 U.S.C.
1824a; 50 U.S.C. 4305; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O.
13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR
44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 7, 2015, 80 FR
48233 (August 11, 2015).

0
2. Amend Supplement No. 5 to Part 774 by:
0
A. In the table, remove the reserved entry under 0A521 and add in its
place entry No. 1.
0
B. In the table, remove the reserved entry under 0E521 and add in its
place entry No. 1.
    The additions read as follows:

Supplement No. 5 to Part 774--Items Classified Under ECCNS 0A521,
0B521, 0C521, 0D521 AND 0E521

    The following table lists items subject to the EAR that are not
listed elsewhere in the CCL, but which the Department of Commerce,
with the concurrence of the Departments of Defense and State, has
identified warrant control for export or reexport because the items
provide at least a significant military or intelligence advantage to
the United States or for foreign policy reasons.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Item descriptor Note: The                                      Date when the item will be
description must match by model        Date of initial or          designated EAR99, unless      Item-specific
 number or a broader descriptor          subsequent BIS          reclassified in another ECCN  license exception
 that does not necessarily need   classification (ID = initial   or the 0Y521 classification      eligibility
     to be company specific       date; SD = subsequent date)            is  reissued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    0A521. Systems, Equipment and Components.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 1 Targets made of or         August 8, 2016 (ID)..........  August 8, 2017...............  License Exception
 containing lithium ``specially                                                                 GOV under Sec.
 designed'' for the production                                                                  740.11(b)(2)(ii)
 of tritium by insertion in the                                                                 only.
 core of a nuclear reactor.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               0E521. Technology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 1 ``Technology'' required    August 8, 2016 (ID)..........  August 8, 2017...............  License Exception
 for the ``development'' or                                                                     GOV under Sec.
 ``production'' of 0A521 No. 1                                                                  740.11(b)(2)(ii)
 items.                                                                                only.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: July 25, 2016.
Matthew S. Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-18070 Filed 8-5-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-33-P


[Federal Register: March 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 58)]
[Notices]
[Page 14609]
[DOCID:fr26mr10-69]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2010-0163]

Commercial Fishing Industry Vessel Safety Advisory Committee;
Vacancies

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Request for applications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard seeks applications for membership on the
Commercial Fishing Industry Vessel Safety Advisory Committee (CFIVSAC).
The CFIVSAC provides advice and makes recommendations to the Coast
Guard on matters relating to the safe operation of commercial fishing
industry vessels.

DATES: Completed application forms should reach the Coast Guard at the
address below on or before June 1, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may request an application form by writing to Commandant
(CG-5433), U.S. Coast Guard, 2100 Second Street, SW., Mail Stop 7581,
Washington, DC 20593-7581; by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>; or by faxing 202-
372-1917. Send your application in written form to the above street
address. This notice and the application form are also available on the
Internet at http://www.FishSafe.info.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jack Kemerer of the Coast Guard by
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CFIVSAC is a Federal advisory committee
under 5 U.S.C. App. (Pub. L. 92-463). The Coast Guard chartered the
CFIVSAC to provide advice on issues related to the safety of commercial
fishing industry vessels regulated under Chapter 45 of Title 46, United
States Code, which includes uninspected fishing vessels, fish
processing vessels, and fish tender vessels. (See 46 U.S.C. 4508.)
    The CFIVSAC meets at least once a year. It may also meet for other
extraordinary purposes. Its subcommittees may gather throughout the
year to prepare for meetings or develop proposals for the committee as
a whole to address specific problems.
    The Coast Guard will consider applications for five positions that
expire or become vacant in October 2010 in the following categories:
(a) Commercial Fishing Industry (two positions); (b) Education or
Training Professionals related to fishing vessels or personnel
qualifications (one position); (c) Underwriters that insure fishing
vessels (one position); and (d) General Public (one position).
    The CFIVSAC consists of 17 members as follows: (a) Ten members from
the commercial fishing industry who reflect a regional and
representational balance and have experience in the operation of
vessels to which Chapter 45 of Title 46, United States Code applies, or
as a crew member or processing line member on an uninspected fish
processing vessel; (b) one member representing each of (1) naval
architects or marine surveyors; (2) manufacturers of equipment for
vessels to which Chapter 45 of Title 46, U.S.C. applies; (3) education
or training professionals related to fishing vessels, fish processing
vessels, fish tender vessel safety, or personnel qualifications; and
(4) underwriters that insure vessels to which Chapter 45 of Title 46,
U.S.C. applies; and (c) three members representing the general public
including, whenever possible, an independent expert or consultant in
maritime safety and a member of a national organization composed of
persons representing owners of vessels to which Chapter 45 of Title 46,
U.S.C. applies and persons representing the marine insurance industry.
    Each member serves for a term of three years. An individual may be
appointed to a term as a member more than once. All members serve at
their own expense and receive no salary from the Federal Government,
although travel reimbursement and per diem may be provided.
    In support of the Coast Guard policy on gender and ethic
nondiscrimination, we encourage qualified men and women and members of
all racial and ethnic groups to apply. The Coast Guard values
diversity; all the different characteristics and attributes of persons
that enhance the mission of the Coast Guard.
    If you are selected as a ``non-representative'' member, or as a
member who represents the general public, you will be appointed and
serve as a Special Government Employee (SGE) as defined in section
202(a) of Title 18, United States Code. As a candidate for appointment
as a SGE, applicants are required to complete a Confidential Financial
Disclosure Report (OGE Form 450). A completed OGE Form 450 is not
releasable to the public except under an order issued by a Federal
court or as otherwise provided under the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a).
Only the Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO) or the DAEO's
designate may release a Confidential Financial Disclosure Report.

    Dated: March 18, 2010.
F.J. Sturm,
Acting Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2010-6694 Filed 3-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2015-41 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2015-41. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2015-41, and should
be submitted on or before June 4, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-11605 Filed 5-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Under OP-22-02015, the two engines (Source IDs 102 and 103) were subject to NO x emission limits of 4.5 g/hp-hr on dual fuel natural gas with No. 2 fuel oil as a pilot fuel and 3.5 g/hp-hr on dual fuel respectively.  Both engines were subject to a NOx emission limit of 11 g/hp-hr on No. 2 oil.

All sources were subject to monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements, as well as good operating and maintenance requirements.  While now complying with presumptive NOx RACT II requirements pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.97(c), Source IDs 031, 034, 102, and 103 will remain subject to several RACT I requirements (see the Incorporation by Reference section below).

Technical and Economic Feasibility
Of the potential NOx control technologies evaluated by the facility for Boilers No. 13 and 14 (Source IDs 032 and 033), SCR, water/steam injection, and SNCR were determined to be infeasible.  SCR is not technically feasible due to flue gas temperatures being well below the effective range of control.  Water/steam injection is not technically feasible due to potential adverse effects on boiler performance.  SNCR is not feasible due to varying modulation in temperatures for these type boilers (urea needs a steady state temperature range of 1,400 ºF-1,600 ºF to be effective).

Of the remaining technologies, FGR/forced draft (FD) fan/LNB, FGR/FD fan, and FGR were determined to be economically infeasible.  FGR/FD fan/LNB is determined to be $9,679 and $14,713/ton of NOx removed for natural gas and No. 6 fuel oil respectively, FGR/FD fan is determined to be $8,036 and $17,857/ton of NOx removed for natural gas and No. 6 fuel oil respectively, and FGR alone is determined to be $11,850 and $39,500/ton of NOx removed for natural gas and No. 6 fuel oil respectively.

The two boilers are already subject to using an oxygen trim system within the performance specification for a low excess air firing system, thus no additional NOx emission reductions can be expected with a new low excess air firing system.

PADEP has determined RACT II for the two boilers to be the existing RACT I short-term NOx emission limitations on each, when combusting No. 6 fuel oil and when combusting natural gas.

PADEP's Conclusions
PADEP has determined that NOx RACT II for Boiler No. 13 (Source ID 032) and Boiler No. 14 (Source ID 033) is:
 214 MMBtu/hr each, No. 6 fuel oil and natural gas fired, which is the same as the RACT I limit
 0.44 lb NOx/MMBtu each when combusting No. 6 fuel oil, which is the same as the RACT I limit (with exception for when fuel borne nitrogen (FBN) in No. 6 fuel oil is greater than 0.49%, then formula is used to calculate lb NOx/MMBtu limits)
 0.23 lb NOx/MMBtu each when combusting natural gas, which is the same as the RACT I limit
 No. 6 fuel oil shall be limited to 1,533,300 gallons per year each based on a consecutive 12-month rolling period (there was no RACT I fuel consumption limit for No. 6 fuel oil)
 Natural gas shall be limited to 584,000,000 cubic feet per year each based on a consecutive 12-month rolling period (there was no RACT I fuel consumption limit for natural gas for Source ID 032; the previous RACT I fuel consumption limit for natural gas for Source ID 033 has been reduced from 787,000,000 cubic feet per year to 584,000,000 cubic feet per year)
 46 tpy NOx emission rate each based on a consecutive 12-month rolling period, which was the basis for the RACT II CbC cost analysis
 Appropriate testing, monitoring and recordkeeping requirements related to RACT II compliance pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §§129.100(d)(1) and (2), and 129.100(a)(4)
EPA's Conclusions and Recommendations
EPA finds that the CbC RACT II determinations provided by PADEP are reasonable and appropriately considered technically and economically feasible controls while setting lowest achievable limits and that the proposed source-specific RACT controls adequately meet RACT under the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for NRG.  EPA also finds that the proposed SIP revisions to meet RACT will not result in additional NOx emissions and thus should not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment or reasonable further progress with the NAAQS or interfere with other applicable CAA requirement.

Incorporation by Reference
NRG Energy Center Paxton, LLC Permit No. 49-00004, issued March 16, 2018, as redacted by Pennsylvania, will supersede the prior RACT Permit Nos. OP-22-02005 and OP-22-02015, both issued March 23, 1999, for Source IDs 032 and 033, Boilers No. 13 and 14.  However, RACT Permit No. OP-22-02005 will remain in effect as to Source IDs 031 and 034, Boilers No. 12 and 15, except for Conditions 1(a), 7, 14, 16, 21; and RACT Permit No. OP-22-02015 will remain in effect as to Source IDs 102 and 103, Engines 1 and 2, except for Conditions 1(a), 7, 8, 9, 10, 12(c), 13, 14.

Chapter 15:  Texas Eastern Transmission, L.P., Bechtelsville Station (#06-05034)

Facility Description and Processes
Texas Eastern Transmission, L.P. - Bechtelsville Station (TE  -  Bechtelsville) is a natural gas compressor station located in Washington Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania.  Permitted emission sources at this facility include four natural gas-fired turbines, an emergency generator, and area fugitive emission sources.

Units Subject to Case-by-Case RACT II
TE  -  Bechtelsville is classified as a major NOx emitting facility, thus required to meet NOx RACT II requirements.  The facility has taken a federally enforceable limit on facility-wide VOC emissions below 50 tpy, thus, it is a minor source of VOC emissions and not subject to VOC RACT II regulations.

Five sources have been identified as subject to NOx RACT II requirements.  Two of the 5 sources (Source IDs 101 and 105) will comply with presumptive NOx RACT II requirements.  The facility has proposed CbC RACT II, in accordance with 25 Pa. Code §129.99, for the remaining three sources (Source IDs 102, 103, and 104).
 Dresser Clark DC 990 Turbine (Source ID 101)  -  Presumptive RACT pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §§129.97(g)(2)(iii) and 129.97(g)(2)(iv)
 Westinghouse W52 Turbine (Source ID 102)
 Westinghouse W52 Turbine (Source ID 103)
 General Electric Frame 5 Turbine (Source ID 104)
 Leroi Emergency IC Engine (Source ID 105)  -  Presumptive RACT pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.97(c)(8)
RACT I Considerations
Under the RACT I rule, the facility was subject to Operating Permit No. OP-06-1034, issued January 31, 1997.  This permit was approved by EPA into the SIP on April 18, 1997.  See 40 CFR §52.2063(c)(120)(i)(B)(2).

Under OP-06-1034, the two Westinghouse W52 turbines (Source IDs 102 and 103) were subject to a NOx emission limit of 116 ppmdv corrected to 15% O2.  The General Electric Frame 5 turbine (Source ID 104) was subject to a NOx emission limit of 120 ppmdv corrected to 15% O2.

Technical and Economic Feasibility
The two Westinghouse W52 turbines (Source IDs 102 and 103) are rated at 6,040 hp and are subject to the presumptive RACT II emission limit of 42 ppmvd at 15% O2.  Source IDs 102 and 103 are unable to meet the presumptive limit, thus the facility is proposing case-by-case RACT.  Of the potential NOx control technologies evaluated by the facility for these two turbines, water/steam injection, dry low NOx combustion, XONON technology (a system that utilizes a flameless combustion system where fuel and air react on a catalyst surface, preventing the formation of NOx while achieving low CO and unburned hydrocarbon emission levels), and SNCR were determined to be infeasible.  Water/steam injection is infeasible because of low flame temperature and flame destabilization.  Dry low NOx combustion is infeasible because it is integral to the design of the combustion chamber, thus, a cost estimate could not be obtained by the facility.  XONON is infeasible because it would be necessary to redesign and replace the combustion chamber.  SNCR is infeasible because the effective temperature range (1,600ºF-2,000ºF) is higher than the current peak exhaust temperature (500ºF -700ºF).  The facility evaluated the economic feasibility of EMx/SCONOx technology (a system consisting of a platinum-based catalyst coated with potassium carbonate to oxidize NOx and CO) and SCR, determining them both to be economically infeasible ($16,676 and $8,758/ton of NOx removed respectively).  The facility is already required to maintain good combustion practices for these two sources.  PADEP has determined RACT II for Source IDs 102 and 103 to be the current RACT I NOx short term limit of 116 ppmvd at 15% O2 per turbine, as well as a 101 tpy rolling NOx limit per turbine.  The tpy rolling limit is based on hours of operation.

The General Electric Frame 5 turbine (Source ID 104) is rated at 18,500 hp and is also subject to the presumptive RACT II emission limit of 42 ppmvd at 15% O2.  Source ID 104 is currently unable to meet the presumptive limit, thus the facility is proposing case-by-case RACT.  Of the potential NOx control technologies evaluated by the facility for this turbine, XONON technology, EMx/SCONOx technology, and SNCR were determined to be infeasible.  XONON is infeasible because it would be necessary to redesign and replace the combustion chamber.  EMx/SCONOx is infeasible because it has not been demonstrated in a simple-cycle gas turbine in natural gas combustion service.  SNCR is infeasible because the effective temperature range (1,600ºF-2,000ºF) is higher than the current peak exhaust temperature (900ºF -1,000ºF).  The facility evaluated the economic feasibility of water/steam injection, dry low NOx combustion, and SCR, determining all three to be economically infeasible ($15,279, $7,622, and $7,442/ton of NOx removed respectively).  The facility is already required to maintain good combustion practices for this source.  PADEP has determined RACT II for Source ID 104 to be the current RACT I NOx short term limit of 120 ppmvd at 15% O2, as well as a 421 tpy rolling NOx limit.  The tpy rolling limit is based on hours of operation.  Texas Eastern will be undergoing a major modernization project to replace all the General Electric Frame 5 turbines along their pipeline, which will bring those sources into compliance with the presumptive RACT II limit by no later than January 1, 2024, including Source ID 104 at TE  -  Bechtelsville.

PADEP's Conclusions
PADEP has determined that NOx RACT II for the two Westinghouse W52 turbines (Source IDs 102 and 103) is the continued implementation of good combustion practices.  The facility will maintain and operate the two turbines in accordance with manufacturer's specifications and with good operating practices.  The proposed RACT II limit for NOx for the two turbines is 116 ppmvd at 15% O2 at all times per turbine, including startup and shutdown periods, and an annual limit of 101 tpy (12-month running total) per turbine.  Compliance with the emission limits will be demonstrated by continuing to conduct NOx stack testing once per permit term.  Compliance with the annual limit will be demonstrated by continuing to monitor and record operating hours (limited to 8,000 hours/year for each turbine) and fuel consumption (there is a fuel-based permit limit of 461.4 MMScf/yr per turbine).

PADEP has determined that NOx RACT II for the General Electric Frame 5 turbine (Source ID 104) is the continued implementation of good combustion practices.  The facility will maintain and operate the turbine in accordance with manufacturer's specifications and with good operating practices.  The proposed RACT II limit for NOx for the turbine is 120 ppmvd at 15% O2 at all times, including startup and shutdown periods, and an annual limit of 421 tpy (12-month running total).  Compliance with the emission limits will be demonstrated by continuing to conduct NOx stack testing once per permit term.  Compliance with the annual limit will be demonstrated by continuing to monitor and record operating hours (limited to 8,000 hours/year) and fuel consumption (there is a fuel-based permit limit of 1,868.5 MMScf/yr).  PADEP has included a condition in the permit for TE  -  Bechtelsville stating that Source ID 104 shall be permanently shut down by no later than January 1, 2024.

EPA's Conclusions and Recommendations
EPA finds that the CbC RACT II determinations provided by PADEP are reasonable and appropriately considered technically and economically feasible controls while setting lowest achievable limits and that the proposed source-specific RACT controls adequately meet RACT under the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for TE  -  Bechtelsville.  EPA also finds that the proposed SIP revisions to meet RACT will not result in additional NOx emissions and thus should not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment or reasonable further progress with the NAAQS or interfere with other applicable CAA requirement.

Incorporation by Reference
Texas Eastern Transmission, L.P.  -  Bechtelsville  -  Incorporating by reference Permit No. 06-05034, issued April 19, 2018, as redacted by Pennsylvania, which supersedes the prior RACT Permit No. OP-06-1034, issued January 31, 1997.

Chapter 16:  Containment Solutions, Inc./Mount Union Plant (#31-05005)

Facility Description and Processes
Containment Solutions, Inc.'s Mount Union Plant (Containment Solutions) is located in Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania.  Containment Solutions manufactures Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic (FRP) underground storage tanks for the petroleum distribution industry and various other industrial users.  This facility includes two boilers that operate on natural gas and No. 2 fuel oil, an emergency generator, a natural gas-fired cleaning furnace, and a layup area.

Units Subject to Case-by-Case RACT II
Containment Solutions is classified as a major VOC emitting facility, thus is required to meet VOC RACT II requirements.  The facility is not a major NOx emitting source, thus is not subject to NOx RACT II requirements.

All the VOC emitting sources at Containment Solutions, with the exception of the layup area (Source ID 101), are exempt from RACT II pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.96(c), because each source's PTE is less than 1 tpy.  Source ID 101, the layup area, has a PTE of 129.1 tpy VOC and was evaluated for CbC RACT II.  Source ID 101 encompasses the production of the storage tanks using an FRP open molding process, which includes six molding stations (rotating mandrels), as well as hand layup and resin spraying activities.

RACT I Considerations
Under the RACT I rule, the facility was subject to Operating Permit No. OP-31-02005, issued April 9, 1999.  This permit was approved by EPA into the SIP on August 6, 2001.  See 40 CFR §52.2020(c)(149)(i)(B)(11).

Under OP-31-02005, RACT was determined to be the following:
 Good operating and maintenance practices
 Total facility resin use shall not exceed 12,910,000 lbs during any consecutive 12-month period
 The resin pouring layup method of tank fabrication shall be employed during the fabrication of the cylindrical tank shells while operating the five large production layup mandrels
 Solvent-based resin cleanup solutions shall not be used at this facility
 Production activities at this facility shall not exceed 8,736 hrs during any consecutive 12-month period
 Appropriate reporting and recordkeeping requirements
Technical and Economic Feasibility
Of the potential VOC control technologies evaluated by the facility for the layup area (Source ID 101), a catalytic oxidizer, carbon adsorption, process changes, a refrigerated condenser, and a flare were determined infeasible.  Catalytic oxidation is infeasible because the high volume of gas collected by the exhaust vents would require multiple oxidizers for each stack and the particulate matter associated with the mandrel process creates the potential problem of fouling the catalyst with particulate, thus reducing efficiency.  Carbon adsorption is technically infeasible for similar reasons as catalytic oxidation.  Additionally, the styrene which evolves from the fiberglass tank manufacturing process potentially poses further technical challenges to the effectiveness of the carbon adsorption.  Process changes were evaluated; however, Containment Solutions is limited in what resins are available to manufacture the products produced at the Mount Union Plant.  Refrigerated condenser and flare technologies have not been commercially demonstrated on FRP processes similar to those that take place at the Mount Union Plant, thus determined to be infeasible.

Thermal oxidization was determined to be technically feasible, thus was evaluated for economic feasibility.  Traditional thermal oxidation systems were determined to require substantial supplemental fuel in order to maintain the required oxidation temperature at this facility.  Even without accounting for supplemental fuel costs, the estimated cost effectiveness of thermal oxidation was determined to be approximately $13,379/ton of VOC controlled.  Thus, thermal oxidation was determined to be economically infeasible.

PADEP determined that the current RACT I VOC control technology and work practices, in addition to continued compliance with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart WWWW (National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Reinforced Plastic Composites Production), are appropriate to fulfill the CbC RACT II requirements for Source ID 101.

PADEP's Conclusions
PADEP has determined that VOC RACT II for the layup area (Source ID 101) is:
 Total facility resin use shall not exceed 12,910,000 lbs during any consecutive 12-month period
 The resin pouring layup method of tank fabrication shall be employed during the fabrication of the cylindrical tank shells while operating the five large production layup machines
 Solvent-based resin cleanup solutions shall not be used at this facility
 Production activities at this facility shall not exceed 8,736 hrs during any consecutive 12-month period
 Appropriate recordkeeping and reporting requirements
 Source 101 shall comply with applicable provisions of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart WWWW- NESHAP: Reinforced Plastic Composites Production
EPA's Conclusions and Recommendations
EPA finds that the CbC RACT II determinations provided by PADEP are reasonable and appropriately considered technically and economically feasible controls while setting lowest achievable limits and that the proposed source-specific RACT controls adequately meet RACT under the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for Containment Solutions.  EPA also finds that the proposed SIP revisions to meet RACT will not result in additional VOC emissions and thus should not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment or reasonable further progress with the NAAQS or interfere with other applicable CAA requirement.

Incorporation by Reference
Containment Solutions, Inc./Mt. Union Plant  -  Incorporating by reference Permit No. 31-05005, issued July 10, 2018, as redacted by Pennsylvania, which supersedes the prior RACT Permit No. OP-31-02005, issued April 9, 1999.

Chapter 17:  Armstrong World Industries, Inc./Marietta Ceiling Plant (#36-05001)

Facility Description and Processes
Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (Armstrong) operates an acoustical ceiling tile manufacturing facility located in the East Donegal Township, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.  This facility includes three direct perlite expanders and a natural gas-fired boardmill dryer consisting of eight zones, each equipped with its own burner assembly comprised of nine ribbon burners, and two reheat burners.  Armstrong also has surface coating operations, 134 natural gas-fired miscellaneous space heaters, four natural gas-fired emergency generators, and a 9.0 MMBtu/hr boiler.

Units Subject to Case-by-Case RACT II
Armstrong is classified as a major VOC emitting facility, thus is required to meet VOC RACT II requirements.  Armstrong is a major NOx emitting source; however, Armstrong has elected to take a 100 tpy (or less) cap on NOx emissions, thus it is not subject to NOx RACT II requirements.

A majority of the VOC emitting sources at Armstrong are exempt from RACT II either because the source's PTE is less than 1 tpy (pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.96(c)), the source is already subject to 25 Pa. Code §129.52 (pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.96(a)), or the source was installed after July 20, 2012 (also pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.96(a)).

Source ID 104, the boardmill line, is the only source at Armstrong evaluated for CbC VOC RACT II, pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.99(d).  Source ID 104 has a PTE of 139.5 tpy.

RACT I Considerations
Under the RACT I rule, the facility was subject to Operating Permit No. OP-36-2001, issued July 3, 1995.  This permit was approved by EPA into the SIP on November 2, 2005.  See 40 CFR §52.2020(d)(1)(b).

Under OP-36-2001, RACT was determined to be the following:
 Condition 5: All air pollution sources and air pollution control devices shall be operated and maintained in accordance with good pollution control practices that minimize the emissions of NOx and VOC
 Condition 6: An annual report as per Section 129.95 containing, but not limited to, the following data for each fuel-burning unit covered by this RACT plan shall be submitted to the Lancaster District Supervisor:
 Identification of each source
 Hours of operation per quarter for each source
 Fuel combusted per quarter for each source
 Pounds of NOx emitted per quarter for each source
 Condition 7: An annual report containing, but not limited to, the following data for each surface coating shall be submitted to the Lancaster District Supervisor:
 Identification of each coating
 Coating quantity
 Lbs of VOC per gallon of coating (minus water)
 Solvent density
 % solvents by volume (minus EPA-exempted solvents)
 % solids by volume
 % water by volume
 Gallons per quarter of coating used (including water)
 Lbs per year of VOC emissions from surface coating
The reports required under Conditions 6 and 7 above for each January 1[st] through December 31[st] period are due no later than March 1[st] of the following year for each year authorized by the operating permit or its renewal.
Armstrong's RACT I requirements are retained as RACT in the facility's operating permit.

Technical and Economic Feasibility
Of the potential VOC control technologies evaluated by the facility for the boardmill line (Source ID 104), all were determined to be technically infeasible and/or economically infeasible.  Tile reformation was determined to be infeasible because ceiling mix must remain fairly fixed due to rigid product specifications in order to meet consumer requirements.  Switching from a direct fired to indirect fired heating system and installing more efficient burners would require a complete redesign and replacement of the boardmill dryer, necessitating high capital investment and resulting in minimal reduction in VOC emissions.  Thus, this option was determined to be infeasible.  Activated carbon adsorption/zeolite adsorption was determined to be technically infeasible based on exhaust characteristics (temperatures are above 170ºF and adsorbents will not work if the gas stream is saturated and above 104ºF).  Oxidation without heat recovery (i.e., direct-fired thermal oxidation) was determined to be infeasible as this technology performs best at inlet concentrations of hydrocarbons around 1,500 to 3,000 ppmvd.  The boardmill's exhaust streams range from 25 to 60 ppmvd, thus the cost to utilize the device would be exorbitant due to the supplemental gas required to sustain a flame as compared to oxidation with heat recovery.  An RTO is technically feasible; however, the cost is approximately $18,510/ton of VOC removed, thus determined to be economically infeasible.  A catalytic oxidizer was determined to be technically infeasible because the boardmill's exhaust temperatures average around 338ºF and contain a high amount of moisture.  Recuperative oxidation was determined to be technically infeasible and economic infeasible also due to the exhaust characteristics of the boardmill and the increased consumption of fuel necessary to support combustion.  Finally, a zeolite concentrator with oxidation was determined to be technically infeasible again due to the exhaust characteristics of the boardmill.

PADEP has determined that RACT II for the boardmill line is to maintain and operate the source in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and with good operating practices for the control of VOC emissions. This determination is based on a search of the RBLC database which did not yield any results for ceiling board manufacturing.

PADEP's Conclusions
PADEP has determined that VOC RACT II for the boardmill line (Source ID 104) is:
 Maintain an operations and maintenance (O&M) plan for the boardmill burners; maintain records of any maintenance or modifications performed on the boardmill burners
 Maintain written documentation of the current O&M plan for the boardmill burners and any maintenance or modifications performed on the boardmill burners for five years; records shall be made available to the Department upon written request pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.100(d) and (i)
EPA's Conclusions and Recommendations
EPA finds that the CbC RACT II determinations provided by PADEP are reasonable and appropriately considered technically and economically feasible controls while setting lowest achievable limits and that the proposed source-specific RACT controls adequately meet RACT under the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for Armstrong.  EPA also finds that the proposed SIP revisions to meet RACT will not result in additional VOC emissions and thus should not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment or reasonable further progress with the NAAQS or interfere with other applicable CAA requirement.

Incorporation by Reference
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.  -  Incorporating by reference Marietta Ceiling Plant - Permit No. 36-05001, issued June 28, 2018, as redacted by Pennsylvania, which supersedes the prior RACT Permit No. 36-2001, issued July 3, 1999.

Chapter 18:  Jeraco Enterprises, Inc. (#49-00014)

Facility Description and Processes
Jeraco Enterprises, Inc. (Jeraco) operates a facility that manufactures truck caps and bed covers for all makes and models of truck, which is located in Milton Borough, Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.  The Milton Plant manufactures both fiber glass and aluminum caps and covers and builds a variety of sizes and capabilities from everyday use to heavy construction.  This facility includes several surface coating, cleaning, and spray layup booths and operations, and seven natural gas-fired space heaters and air make-up units.

Units Subject to Case-by-Case RACT II
Jeraco is classified as a major VOC emitting facility, thus is required to meet VOC RACT II requirements.  The facility is not a major NOx emitting source, thus is not subject to NOx RACT II requirements.

Of the permitted sources at Jeraco, the resin storage tank (Source ID 103B) and the miscellaneous sources are exempt from RACT II, pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.96(c), because the PTE for each source is less than 1 tpy VOC.  Jeraco has elected to take a less than 1 tpy VOC limit on Source IDs 031 (the seven natural gas-fired space heaters and air make-up units) and P104 (miscellaneous VOC sources) each, thus they are also exempt from RACT II pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.96(c).

CbC RACT II was evaluated for Source IDs 101A (spray layup and cleanup operation), 102A (surface coating and cleanup operation), 203, 204, and 205 (the three surface coating booths).

RACT I Considerations
Under the RACT I rule, the facility, was subject to Operating Permit No. OP-49-0014, issued April 6, 1997.  This permit was approved by EPA into the SIP on March 29, 2005.  See 40 CFR §52.2020(d)(1)(h).

Under OP-49-0014, Source ID 101A was subject to RACT I recordkeeping requirements for the amounts of each material used at the source each month, as well as monthly emissions calculations for VOC pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.95.  Source ID 101A is limited to 63 tpy VOC and 50.2 tpy styrene emissions pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.91.  Source ID 102A was subject to RACT I recordkeeping requirements for the amounts and VOC contents of each material and the amount of diluent used at the source each month, as well as monthly emissions calculations for VOC pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.95.  Source ID 102A is limited to 5.0 lb VOC/gallon of applied coating for clear coatings and 6.68 lb VOC/gallon of applied coating for all coatings other than clear coatings pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.91.

Source IDs 203, 204, and 205 are identified in the facility's operating permit as their own distinct sources separate from Source ID 102A.  However, these three spray booths are a part of the surface coating operations covered by Source ID 102A.

Technical and Economic Feasibility
Jeraco's spray layup and cleanup operations (Source ID 101A) did not qualify for the presumptive RACT II requirements found in 25 Pa. Code §129.97, therefore, it is subject to case-by-case.  Both a recuperative thermal oxidizer and an RTO were determined to be technically feasible control options for VOC emissions.  The RTO was determined to be $12,752/ton VOC removed (based on a 96% removal efficiency) and $12,492/ton VOC removed (based on a 98% removal efficiency).  The analysis concluded that the costs of an RTO are significantly less than those of a recuperative thermal oxidizer.  Therefore, as an RTO was determined to be cost prohibitive, a recuperative thermal oxidizer with similar control efficiencies was also determined to be economically infeasible.  Source ID 101A is currently subject to RACT I styrene content restrictions, annual VOC emission limitations, and recordkeeping and work practice requirements, which PADEP has determined to represent CbC RACT II for this source.

The company's CbC RACT determination for Source ID 102A, the surface coating and cleanup operations, is similar to the analysis for Source 101A.  Source ID 102A also did not qualify for the presumptive RACT II requirements found in 25 Pa. Code §129.97.  The RTO was determined to be $27,831/ton VOC removed (based on a 96% removal efficiency) and $27,263/ton VOC removed (based on a 98% removal efficiency).  As with the case-by-case analysis for Source ID 101A, the costs of an RTO are significantly less than those of a recuperative thermal oxidizer.  Therefore, as an RTO was determined to be economically infeasible, a recuperative thermal oxidizer with similar control efficiencies was also determined to be economically infeasible.  Source ID 102A is currently in compliance with 25 Pa. Code §129.52(d), "Control of VOC emissions from miscellaneous metal parts surface coating processes, miscellaneous plastic parts surface coating processes and pleasure craft surface coatings," as well as subject to RACT I VOC content restrictions, material usage and recordkeeping requirements, monthly emission calculations criteria, and work practice requirements, which PADEP has determined to represent CbC RACT II for this source.

The RTO system discussed above for Source ID 102A would also control VOC emissions from Source IDs 203, 204, and 205 (the three spray booths), as they are part of the surface coating operations covered under Source ID 102A.  Therefore, the case-by-case determination performed for Source ID 102A also applies to these spray booths since they are integral to the surface coating operations.

PADEP's Conclusions
PADEP has determined that VOC RACT II for the spray layup and cleanup operations (Source ID 101A) is:
 No gelcoat material used in Source 101A shall contain styrene in excess of 37%, by weight, and no resin material used in Source 101A shall contain styrene in excess of 36% by weight
 63 tons VOC in any 12 consecutive month period
 50.2 tons styrene in any 12 consecutive month period
 Appropriate recordkeeping requirements pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.100
 All gelcoat and resin materials shall be applied using airless spray systems, or equivalent or better, as determined by the Department
 All solvents used for spray line cleaning shall be flushed into closed containers; under no circumstances shall cleanup solvent be removed from spray lines by spraying through a spray gun.  All containers of solvent and waste solvent shall be kept closed when not in actual use and all solvent-wet rags shall be stored in closed containers when not in actual use.  Under no circumstances shall waste solvent be disposed of or solvent-wet rags, etc. be treated or pre-treated prior to disposal or reuse by subjecting them to air drying or any other means of solvent removal which would cause solvent to be evaporated into the air.
 The only cleanup solvent to be used for spray line flushing and spray equipment cleanup activities associated with Source ID 101A shall be acetone, unless Department approval is granted for the use of an alternative cleanup solvent
PADEP has determined that VOC RACT for the surface coating and cleanup operations (Source ID 102A) is:
 Low bake/air dried coatings-exterior parts: Primer: 4.8 lb VOC/gal coating; Basecoat: 5.0 lb VOC/gal coating; Clear coat: 4.5 lb VOC/gal coating; Non-basecoat/clean coat: 5.0 lb VOC/gal coating
 Low bake/air dried coatings- interior parts: 5.0 lb VOC/gal coating
 Touch-up and repair: 5.2 lb VOC/gal coating
 For red, yellow and black automotive coatings, except touch-up and repair coatings, the limit is determined by multiplying the appropriate limit in this table (Table III, 25 Pa. Code §129.52(d)) by 1.15
 Shall not cause or permit the emission into the outdoor atmosphere of VOC from Source IDs 102A, 203, 204, and 205 unless emissions of VOC are controlled in accordance with: VOC content of each miscellaneous metal part coating or each miscellaneous plastic part coating, as applied, excluding water and exempt compounds, is equal to or less than the VOC content limit for the applicable coating category specified in the applicable table of VOC content limits in Table III of 25 Pa. Code §129.52(d))
 Appropriate recordkeeping requirements pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.100
 All surface coatings shall be applied using a high volume, low pressure (HVLP) spray system, or equivalent or better spray system, as determined by the Department
 All solvents used for spray line cleaning shall be flushed into closed containers; under no circumstances shall cleanup solvent be removed from spray lines by spraying through a spray gun.  All containers of solvent and waste solvent shall be kept closed when not in actual use and all solvent-wet rags shall be stored in closed containers when not in actual use.  Under no circumstances shall waste solvent be disposed of or solvent-wet rags, etc. be treated or pre-treated prior to disposal or reuse by subjecting them to air drying or any other means of solvent removal which would cause solvent to be evaporated into the air.
 Shall not cause or permit the emission into the outdoor atmosphere of VOC from Source IDs 102A, 203, 204, and 205 unless the coatings are applied using one or more of the following coating application methods: HVLP spray coating
 Comply with the following work practices for coating-related activities for Source IDs 102A, 203, 204, and 205: store all VOC-containing coatings, thinners or coating-related waste materials in closed containers; ensure that mixing and storage containers used for VOC-containing coatings, thinners or coating-related waste materials are kept closed at all times, except when depositing or removing those coatings, thinners or waste materials; minimize spills of VOC-containing coatings, thinners or coating-related waste materials and clean up spills immediately; convey VOC-containing coatings, thinners or coating-related waste materials from one location to another in closed containers or pipes
 Comply with the following work practices for cleaning materials for Source IDs 102A, 203, 204, and 205: store all VOC-containing cleaning materials and used shop towels in closed containers; ensure that mixing vessels and storage containers used for VOC-containing cleaning materials are kept closed at all times except when depositing or removing these materials; minimize spills of VOC-containing cleaning materials and clean up spills immediately; convey VOC-containing cleaning materials from one location to another in closed containers or pipes; minimize VOC emissions from cleaning of application, storage, mixing or conveying equipment by ensuring that equipment cleaning is performed without atomizing the cleaning solvent and all spent solvent is captured in closed containers
 Regardless of the facility's VOC emissions, the permittee shall comply with 25 Pa. Code §129.52(d) as specified throughout §129.52(d) for Source IDs 102A, 203, 204, and 205
PADEP has determined that VOC RACT II for each surface coating booth (booths 3, 4, and 5; Source IDs 203, 204, and 205) is:
 Total combined VOC emissions from Source IDs 203, 204, and 205 shall not exceed 18 tons in any 12 consecutive month period, including VOC emissions resulting from use of strippable booth coatings
 Total combined HAPs from Source IDs 203, 204, and 205 shall not exceed 15 tons in any 12 consecutive month period
 Total combined emission of any individual HAP from Source IDs 203, 204, and 205 combined shall not exceed 6 tons in any 12 consecutive month period
 Low bake/air dried coatings-exterior parts: Primer: 4.8 lb VOC/gal coating; Basecoat: 5.0 lb VOC/gal coating; Clear coat: 4.5 lb VOC/gal coating; Non-basecoat/clean coat: 5.0 lb VOC/gal coating
 Low bake/air dried coatings- interior parts: 5.0 lb VOC/gal coating
 Touch-up and repair: 5.2 lb VOC/gal coating
 For red, yellow and black automotive coatings, except touch-up and repair coatings, the limit is determined by multiplying the appropriate limit in this table (Table III, 25 Pa. Code §129.52(d)) by 1.15
 Shall not cause or permit the emission into the outdoor atmosphere of VOC from Source IDs 102A, 203, 204, and 205 unless emissions of VOC are controlled in accordance with: VOC content of each miscellaneous metal part coating or each miscellaneous plastic part coating, as applied, excluding water and exempt compounds, is equal to or less than the VOC content limit for the applicable coating category specified in the applicable table of VOC content limits in Table III of 25 Pa. Code §129.52(d)
 Appropriate recordkeeping requirements pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.100
 Shall only use HVLP spray guns to apply coatings
 All solvents used for spray line cleaning shall be flushed into closed containers; under no circumstances shall cleanup solvent be removed from spray lines by spraying through a spray gun.  All containers of solvent and waste solvent shall be kept closed when not in actual use and all solvent-wet rags shall be stored in closed containers when not in actual use.  Under no circumstances shall waste solvent be disposed of or solvent-wet rags, etc. be treated or pre-treated prior to disposal or reuse by subjecting them to air drying or any other means of solvent removal which would cause solvent to be evaporated into the air.
 Acetone shall be the only solvent used for cleanup
 Water based strippable spray booth coating shall be used when possible to minimize the use of acetone for cleanup.  The water based strippable coating shall not contain VOC in excess of 0.24 lbs/gal of coating, as applied.  Furthermore, the strippable spray booth coating shall not contain HAPs.
 Shall not cause or permit the emission into the outdoor atmosphere of VOC from Source IDs 102A, 203, 204, and 205 unless the coatings are applied using one or more of the following coating application methods: HVLP spray coating
 Comply with the following work practices for coating-related activities for Source IDs 102A, 203, 204, and 205: store all VOC-containing coatings, thinners or coating-related waste materials in closed containers; ensure that mixing and storage containers used for VOC-containing coatings, thinners or coating-related waste materials are kept closed at all times, except when depositing or removing those coatings, thinners or waste materials; minimize spills of VOC-containing coatings, thinners or coating-related waste materials and clean up spills immediately; convey VOC-containing coatings, thinners or coating-related waste materials from one location to another in closed containers or pipes
 Comply with the following work practices for cleaning materials for Source IDs 102A, 203, 204, and 205: store all VOC-containing cleaning materials and used shop towels in closed containers; ensure that mixing vessels and storage containers used for VOC-containing cleaning materials are kept closed at all times except when depositing or removing these materials; minimize spills of VOC-containing cleaning materials and clean up spills immediately; convey VOC-containing cleaning materials from one location to another in closed containers or pipes; minimize VOC emissions from cleaning of application, storage, mixing or conveying equipment by ensuring that equipment cleaning is performed without atomizing the cleaning solvent and all spent solvent is captured in closed containers
 Regardless of the facility's VOC emissions, the permittee shall comply with 25 Pa. Code §129.52(d) as specified throughout §129.52(d) for Source IDs 102A, 203, 204, and 205
Source ID 101A is also subject to 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart WWWW, the NESHAP for Reinforced Plastic Composites Production.  Source IDs 102A, 203, 204, and 205 are also subject to 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart PPPP, the NESHAP for Surface Coating of Plastic, Parts, and Production.

EPA's Conclusions and Recommendations
EPA finds that the CbC RACT II determinations provided by PADEP are reasonable and appropriately considered technically and economically feasible controls while setting lowest achievable limits and that the proposed source-specific RACT controls adequately meet RACT under the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for Jeraco.  EPA also finds that the proposed SIP revisions to meet RACT will not result in additional VOC emissions and thus should not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment or reasonable further progress with the NAAQS or interfere with other applicable CAA requirement.

Incorporation by Reference
Jeraco Enterprises Inc.  -  Incorporating by reference Permit No. 49-00014, issued January 26, 2018, as redacted by Pennsylvania.  All permit conditions in the prior RACT Permit No. OP-49-0014, issued April 6, 1997, remain as RACT requirements.

Chapter 19:  Blommer Chocolate Company (#46-00198)

Facility Description and Processes
Blommer Chocolate Company (Bloomer) is a chocolate manufacturing company is located in Upper Hanover Township, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.  This facility includes two natural gas/propane boilers, each 12.550 MMBtu/hr, and multiple cocoa bean roasting and grinding line operations.

Units Subject to Case-by-Case RACT II
Bloomer is classified as a major VOC emitting facility, thus is required to meet VOC RACT II requirements.  The facility is not a major NOx emitting source, thus is not subject to NOx RACT II requirements.

The following nine sources were evaluated for CbC VOC RACT II:
 Line 2 Roaster (Source ID 105)
 Line 2 Grinder (Source ID 108)
 Line 1 Roaster (Source ID 109)
 Line 3 Grinder (Source ID 118A)
 Alkalization Processes (Source ID 124A)
 Line 3 Roaster (Source ID 125)
 Line 1 Grinder (Source ID 132A)
 Line 4 Micronizer (Source ID 143)
 Line 4 Cooler (Source ID 147)
Source IDs 107, 110A, 110B, 131A, 135, 142, 144, 033, 034, 109, 125, 131A, 142, 700, and C001 will comply with presumptive VOC RACT pursuant to 25 Pa Code §129.97(c)(2), 129.97(c)(3), 129.97(c)(5), and 129.97(c)(6).

RACT I Considerations
Blommer was not issued a RACT I permit by PADEP.

Technical and Economic Feasibility
The nature and speciation of process-related VOC emissions is similar for all sources at Blommer since each of the emission sources process essentially the same raw material (cocoa beans) in one form or another.  Due to the similarities in the VOC emissions profile, the case-by-case RACT analysis was conducted in general for all the affected sources.

Of the 10 VOC control technologies evaluated, six were determined to be technically infeasible.  Blommer already has a RTO in operation (Source ID C001) to control emissions from Line 4 Roaster (Source ID 145) and Line 4 Grinder (Source ID 148) operations.  The use of the existing RTO for additional sources was determined infeasible because the existing unit does not have the capacity to adequately handle and control additional air flows.  Catalytic oxidation was determined to be infeasible because the catalyst is incompatible with the exhaust constituents.  Adsorption is technically infeasible because the presence of fats and oils in the exhaust stream will foul, clog, and saturate the adsorption media.  Absorption is also infeasible because those same fats and oils will not easily be entrained in a water-based scrubbing medium.  Dry electrostatic precipitation (ESP) was determined to be infeasible because the tar buildup from the fats and oils on the electrodes would eventually lead to decreased efficiency of the unit.  Finally, mist elimination/fine fiber filtration is infeasible because, again, the nature of the exhaust stream makes it difficult to remove the fats and oils from the filter by the wash down spray system, resulting in a clogged filter bed.

Of the remaining four VOC control technologies- a new RTO, bio-filtration, wet ESP, and good operating practices- three were evaluated for economic feasibility.  Blommer currently uses good operating practices, thus, a control cost analysis was not conducted.  It was determined that the installation of a new RTO would not only abate more VOC emissions than the other technically feasible controls, but it would also yield the most cost-effective result (demonstrated in lowest dollar amount/ton of VOC controlled).  However, the installation of a new RTO was determined to be economically infeasible for all processes evaluated.  Line 1 (Source IDs 109 and 132A) was determined to be $25,964/ton VOC controlled, Line 2 (Source IDs 105 and 108) was determined to be $10,833/ton VOC controlled, Line 3 (Source IDs 118A and 125) was determined to be $8,358/ton VOC controlled, Line 4 (Source IDs 143 and 147) was determined to be $32,234/ton VOC controlled, and the Alkalization Processes (Source ID 124A) was determined to be $11,828/ton VOC controlled.

PADEP has determined RACT to be the installation, maintenance, and operation of the source in accordance with manufacturer's specifications and the use of good operating practices for the control of VOC emissions from the source, in addition to compliance with previously established permit emission limitations.  PADEP had determined that the emission limitations represented BAT at the time of permitting each source.

PADEP's Conclusions
PADEP has determined that VOC RACT II for the Line 2 Roaster (Source ID 105) is:
 10.41 tpy VOC on a 12-month rolling sum basis
 Appropriate recordkeeping and reporting pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.100(d) and 129.100(i)
 Install, maintain, and operate each source in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and with good operating practices
PADEP has determined that VOC RACT II for the Line 2 Grinder (Source ID 108) is:
 4.68 tpy VOC on a 12-month rolling sum basis, combined emissions of VOC from Line 2 Grinder No. 1 and Line 2 Grinder No. 2
 Appropriate recordkeeping and reporting pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.100(d) and 129.100(i)
 Install, maintain, and operate each source in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and with good operating practices
PADEP has determined that VOC RACT II for the Line 1 Roaster (Source ID 109) is:
 Appropriate recordkeeping and reporting pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.100(d) and 129.100(i)
 Install, maintain, and operate each source in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and with good operating practices
PADEP has determined that VOC RACT II for the Line 3 Grinder (Source ID 118A) is:
 7.78 tpy VOC on a 12-month rolling sum basis
 Appropriate recordkeeping and reporting pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.100(d) and 129.100(i)
 Install, maintain, and operate each source in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and with good operating practices
PADEP has determined that VOC RACT II for the Alkalization Processes (Source ID 124A) is:
 13.05 tpy VOC on a 12-month rolling sum basis, combined emissions of VOC from nauta mixers, red and black reactors, potassium carbonate storage and mix tank, and alkalization processes condenser (Line 3) pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.99(c)
 Appropriate recordkeeping and reporting pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.100(d) and 129.100(i)
 Install, maintain, and operate each source in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and with good operating practices
PADEP has determined that VOC RACT II for the Line 3 Roaster (Source ID 125) is:
 21.31 tpy VOC on a 12-month rolling sum basis
 Appropriate recordkeeping and reporting pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §129.100(d) and 129.100(i)
 Install, maintain, and operate each source in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and with good operating practices
PADEP has determined that VOC RACT II for the Line 1 Grinder (Source ID 132A) is:
 5.5 tpy VOC on a 12-month rolling sum basis
 Appropriate recordkeeping and reporting pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §§129.100(d) and 129.100(i)
 Install, maintain, and operate each source in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and with good operating practices
PADEP has determined that VOC RACT II for the Line 4 Micronizer (Source ID 143) is:
 3.29 tpy VOC on a 12-month rolling sum basis
 Appropriate recordkeeping and reporting pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §§129.100(d) and 129.100(i)
 Install, maintain, and operate each source in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and with good operating practices
PADEP has determined that VOC RACT II for the Line 4 Cooler (Source ID 147) is:
 6.42 tpy VOC on a 12-month rolling sum basis
 Appropriate recordkeeping and reporting pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §§129.100(d) and 129.100(i)
 Install, maintain, and operate each source in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and with good operating practices
EPA's Conclusions and Recommendations
EPA finds that the CbC RACT II determinations provided by PADEP are reasonable and appropriately considered technically and economically feasible controls while setting lowest achievable limits and that the proposed source-specific RACT controls adequately meet RACT under the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for Blommer.

Incorporation by Reference
Blommer Chocolate Company  -  Incorporating by reference Permit No. 46-00198, issued January 26, 2017, as redacted by Pennsylvania.