[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13710-13711]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05014]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Certification
of Aircraft and Airmen for the Operation of Light-Sport Aircraft

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew a previously approved
information collection. Information is maintained by owners and
operators of light-sport aircraft and is collected to be used by FAA
safety inspectors in determining whether required maintenance actions
have been accomplished on light-sport aircraft. The information is also
used when investigating accidents.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by April 13, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed to the attention of the Desk Officer, Department of
Transportation/FAA, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronda Thompson by email at:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0730.
    Title: Certification of aircraft and Airmen for the Operation of
Light-Sport Aircraft.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the following collection of information
was published on November 1, 2016 (81 FR 75899). There were no
comments. 14 CFR 91.417 requires the owners and operators of light-
sport aircraft to maintain a record of the current status of applicable
safety directives and transfer that information at the time of sale of
the aircraft. The information is used by FAA safety inspectors in
determining whether required maintenance actions have been accomplished
on aircraft. The information is also used when investigating accidents.
    Respondents: Approximately 1,000 operators/owners.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 2 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 2,133 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 1, 2017.
Ronda L. Thompson,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, Performance, Policy &
Records Management Branch, ASP-110.
[FR Doc. 2017-05014 Filed 3-13-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 25, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 206)]
[Notices]
[Page 66074-66075]
[DOCID:fr25oc11-79]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0568]

Small Entity Compliance Guide: Required Warnings for Cigarette
Packages and Advertisements; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance for industry entitled ``Required Warnings
for Cigarette Packages and Advertisements--Small Entity Compliance
Guide'' for a final rule published in the Federal Register on June 22,
2011. This small entity compliance guide (SECG) is intended to set
forth in plain language the requirements of the regulation and to help
small businesses understand and comply with the regulation.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the SECG at any
time.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the SECG
entitled ``Required Warnings for Cigarette Packages and
Advertisements--Small Entity Compliance Guide'' to the Center for
Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, 9200 Corporate Blvd.,
Rockville, MD 20850-3229. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist that office in processing your request or include a fax number
to which the guidance document may be sent. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic access to the guidance document.

    Submit electronic comments on the guidance to http://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerie Voss, Center for Tobacco
Products, Food and Drug Administration, 9200 Corporate Blvd.,
Rockville, MD 20850-3229,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In the Federal Register of June 22, 2011 (76 FR 36628), FDA issued
a final rule regarding required warnings for use on cigarette packages
and in cigarette advertisements. FDA examined the economic implications
of the final rule as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601-612) and determined that the rule would have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. In
compliance with section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (Public Law 104-121), FDA is making available
this SECG stating in plain language the legal requirements of the June
22, 2011, final rule, set forth in 21 CFR part 1141, establishing
requirements for graphic health warnings on cigarette packages and in
cigarette advertisements.
    FDA is issuing this SECG as level 2 guidance consistent with FDA's
good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115(c)(2)). The SECG
represents the Agency's current thinking on this topic. It does not
create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate
to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used if such
approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and
regulations.

II. Comments

    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this
document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no
longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain an electronic
version of this guidance document at either http://www.regulations.gov
or http://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/
GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/default.htm.

    Dated: October 20, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-27530 Filed 10-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 51 (Thursday, March 15, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11445-11446]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05194]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0006; Airspace Docket No. 18-AGL-1]

Proposed Amendment of Class D Airspace; Appleton, WI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify Class D airspace at Appleton
International Airport (formerly Outagamie County Airport), Appleton,
WI. The FAA is proposing this action due to the decommissioning of the
GAMIE locator outer marker (LOM) and collocated outer marker (OM) which
provided navigation guidance to the airport. This action would enhance
the safety and management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations
at this airport. Also, the airport name and geographic coordinates
would be adjusted to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database.
Additionally, this action would replace the outdated term ``Airport/
Facility Directory'' with the term ``Chart Supplement'' in the legal
description, remove the city associated with the airport name in the
airspace designation.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 30, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone
(202) 366-9826, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2018-0006; Airspace Docket No. 18-AGL-1 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in
the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
    FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC, 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11B at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Walter Tweedy, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend Class D airspace, at Appleton International Airport,
Appleton, WI, to support instrument flight rules (IFR) operations at
the airport.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2018-0006/
Airspace Docket No. 18-AGL-1.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Federal Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017, and effective
September 15, 2017. FAA Order 7400.11B is publicly available as listed

in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11B lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by modifying Class D airspace extending
upward from the surface to and including 3,400 feet MSL within a 4.2-
mile radius (decreased from a 4.4-mile radius) of Appleton
International Airport (formerly Outagamie County Airport), Appleton,
WI. Airspace reconfiguration is necessary due to the decommissioning of
the GAMIE LOM/OM.
    This proposal also would update the airport name and geographic
coordinates of the airport to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical
database.
    Additionally, this action would make an editorial change to the
Class D airspace legal description replacing ``Airport/Facility
Directory'' with the term ``Chart Supplement''.
    Finally, an editorial change would be made removing the name of the
city associated with the airport name in the airspace designation to
comply with a recent change to FAA Order 7400.2L, Procedures for
Handling Airspace Actions, dated October 12, 2017.
    Class D airspace designations are published in paragraph 5000, of
FAA Order 7400.11B, dated August 3, 2017, and effective September 15,
2017, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11B,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017, and
effective September 15, 2017, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

AGL WI D Appleton, WI [Amended]

Appleton International Airport, WI
    (Lat. 44[deg]15'29'' N, long 88[deg]31'09'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,400 feet MSL within a 4.2-mile radius of Appleton International
Airport. This Class D airspace area is effective during the specific
dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The
effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in
the Chart Supplement.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on March 8, 2018.
Christopher L. Southerland,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2018-05194 Filed 3-14-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 146 (Thursday, July 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 45540]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18649]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0397]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office
of Management and Budget Approval; State Enforcement Notifications

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
collection of information entitled, ``State Enforcement Notifications''
has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd., COLE-14526, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 8, 2015, the Agency submitted a
proposed collection of information entitled, ``State Enforcement
Notifications'' to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information
collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0275. The approval
expires on July 31, 2018. A copy of the supporting statement for this
information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: July 24, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-18649 Filed 7-29-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 8, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 26739]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10827]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0358; FRL-9809-8]

Notice of Final Action on Petition From Earthjustice To List Coal
Mines as a Source Category and To Regulate Air Emissions From Coal
Mines

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Denial of petition for rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action provides notice that on April 30, 2013, the Acting
EPA Administrator, Bob Perciasepe, signed a letter denying a petition
to add coal mines to the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 111 list of
stationary source categories. The agency denied the petition because
the EPA must prioritize its actions in light of limited resources and
ongoing budget uncertainties, and at this time, cannot commit to
conducting the process to determine whether coal mines should be added
to the list of categories under CAA 111(b)(1)(A). The letter explains
in detail the EPA's reasons for the denial.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Allison Mayer, Sector Policies and
Programs Division (E143-03), Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina 27711; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
(919) 541-3470; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    This Federal Register notice, the petition for rulemaking and the
letter denying the petition for rulemaking are available in the docket
that the EPA established under Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0358.
All documents in the docket are listed on the www.regulations.gov Web
site. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov, or in hard copy at the EPA
Docket Center (Air Docket), EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744 and the telephone number for the Air Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

II. Judicial Review

    Any petitions for review of the letter denying the petition to list
coal mines as a source category described in this Notice must be filed
in the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by July 8,
2013.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations.

    Dated: April 30, 2013.
Bob Perciasepe,
Acting EPA Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-10827 Filed 5-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28332-28335]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13004]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-1999-6480; FMCSA-2000-7363; FMCSA-2001-10578; FMCSA-
2003-15892; FMCSA-2003-16564; FMCSA-2004-17195; FMCSA-2005-23099;
FMCSA-2006-24015; FMCSA-2007-0071; FMCSA-2007-26653; FMCSA-2007-27897;
FMCSA-2007-28695; FMCSA-2008-0021; FMCSA-2009-0303; FMCSA-2009-0321;
FMCSA-2010-0050; FMCSA-2011-0324; FMCSA-2011-0365; FMCSA-2011-0366;
FMCSA-2011-0378; FMCSA-2011-0379; FMCSA-2011-0380; FMCSA-2012-0040;
FMCSA-2012-0104; FMCSA-2013-0029; FMCSA-2013-0030; FMCSA-2013-0165;
FMCSA-2013-0167; FMCSA-2013-0168; FMCSA-2013-0170; FMCSA-2013-0174;
FMCSA-2014-0002; FMCSA-2014-0003; FMCSA-2014-0004; FMCSA-2015-0070;
FMCSA-2015-0071; FMCSA-2015-0072; FMCSA-2015-0344; FMCSA-2015-0347;
FMCSA-2015-0348; FMCSA-2015-0350; FMCSA-2015-0351; FMCSA-2016-0024;
FMCSA-2016-0025; FMCSA-2016-0027]

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of renewal of exemptions; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to renew exemptions for 95
individuals from the vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) for interstate commercial motor vehicle
(CMV) drivers. The exemptions enable these individuals to continue to
operate CMVs in interstate commerce without meeting the vision
requirements in one eye.

DATES: Each group of renewed exemptions were applicable on the dates
stated in the discussions below and will expire on the dates stated in
the discussions below. Comments must be received on or before July 18,
2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments bearing the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Docket No. FMCSA-1999-6480; FMCSA-2000-7363;
FMCSA-2001-10578; FMCSA-2003-15892; FMCSA-2003-16564; FMCSA-2004-17195;
FMCSA-2005-23099; FMCSA-2006-24015; FMCSA-2007-0071; FMCSA-2007-26653;
FMCSA-2007-27897; FMCSA-2007-28695; FMCSA-2008-0021; FMCSA-2009-0303;
FMCSA-2009-0321; FMCSA-2010-0050; FMCSA-2011-0324; FMCSA-2011-0365;
FMCSA-2011-0366; FMCSA-2011-0378; FMCSA-2011-0379; FMCSA-2011-0380;
FMCSA-2012-0040; FMCSA-2012-0104; FMCSA-2013-0029; FMCSA-2013-0030;
FMCSA-2013-0165; FMCSA-2013-0167; FMCSA-2013-0168; FMCSA-2013-0170;
FMCSA-2013-0174; FMCSA-2014-0002; FMCSA-2014-0003; FMCSA-2014-0004;
FMCSA-2015-0070; FMCSA-2015-0071; FMCSA-2015-0072; FMCSA-2015-0344;
FMCSA-2015-0347; FMCSA-2015-0348; FMCSA-2015-0350; FMCSA-2015-0351;
FMCSA-2016-0024; FMCSA-2016-0025; FMCSA-2016-0027 using any of the
following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the
docket number(s) for this notice. Note that all comments received will
be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below
for further information.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov at any time or Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The FDMS is available 24 hours each day, e.t.,
365 days each year. If you want acknowledgment that we received your
comments, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope or postcard
or print the acknowledgement page that appears after submitting
comments online.
    Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed
at http://www.dot.gov/privacy.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Christine A. Hydock, Chief,
Medical Programs Division,<PHONE_NUMBER>,

[email protected], FMCSA, Department of Transportation, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Room W64-224, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours
are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. If you have questions regarding viewing or submitting
material to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-
9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
for five years if it finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety that is equivalent to or greater than the level that
would be achieved absent such exemption.'' The statute also allows the
Agency to renew exemptions at the end of the five-year period. FMCSA
grants exemptions from the FMCSRs for a two-year period to align with
the maximum duration of a driver's medical certification.
    The physical qualification standard for drivers regarding vision
found in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) states that a person is physically
qualified to driver a CMV if that person has distant visual acuity of
at least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye without corrective lenses or
visual acuity separately corrected to 20/40 (Snellen) or better with
corrective lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least 20/40 (Snellen)
in both eyes with or without corrective lenses, field of vision of at
least 70[deg] in the horizontal meridian in each eye, and the ability
to recognize the colors of traffic signals and devices showing red,
green, and amber.
    The 95 individuals listed in this notice have requested renewal of
their exemptions from the vision standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), in
accordance with FMCSA procedures. Accordingly, FMCSA has evaluated
these applications for renewal on their merits and decided to extend
each exemption for a renewable two year period.

II. Request for Comments

    Interested parties or organizations possessing information that
would otherwise show that any, or all, of these drivers are not
currently achieving the statutory level of safety should immediately
notify FMCSA. The Agency will evaluate any adverse evidence submitted
and, if safety is being compromised or if continuation of the exemption
would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA will take immediate steps to revoke the
exemption of a driver.

III. Basis for Renewing Exemptions

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(1), an exemption may be granted for no
longer than two years from its approval date and may be renewed upon
application. In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each of
the 95 applicants has satisfied the renewal conditions for obtaining an
exemption from the vision requirement (64 FR 68195; 65 FR 20251; 65 FR
45817; 65 FR 77066; 66 FR 53826; 66 FR 66966; 67 FR 38311; 68 FR 1654;
68 FR 61860; 68 FR 69434; 68 FR 74699; 68 FR 75715; 69 FR 10503; 69 FR
17263; 69 FR 26921; 69 FR 31447; 70 FR 7545; 70 FR 74102; 71 FR 4194;
71 FR 6829; 71 FR 13450; 71 FR 14566; 71 FR 16410; 71 FR 27033; 71 FR
30227; 72 FR 8417; 72 FR 36099; 72 FR 39879; 72 FR 46261; 72 FR 52419;
72 FR 54972; 72 FR 71998; 73 FR 6242; 73 FR 8392; 73 FR 9158; 73 FR
11989; 73 FR 15567; 73 FR 16950; 73 FR 27014; 73 FR 27015; 73 FR 28186;
74 FR 34394; 74 FR 60021; 74 FR 60022; 74 FR 65846; 75 FR 1451; 75 FR
1835; 75 FR 4623; 75 FR 8184; 75 FR 9477; 75 FR 9482; 75 FR 9484; 75 FR
13653; 75 FR 14656; 75 FR 19674; 75 FR 27622; 75 FR 27623; 75 FR 28682;
76 FR 53708; 76 FR 70210; 76 FR 78729; 77 FR 3552; 77 FR 5874; 77 FR
7233; 77 FR 7657; 77 FR 10606; 77 FR 13689; 77 FR 13691; 77 FR 15184;
77 FR 17107; 77 FR 17109; 77 FR 17115; 77 FR 17117; 77 FR 19749; 77 FR
22059; 77 FR 22061; 77 FR 22838; 77 FR 23797; 77 FR 23799; 77 FR 26816;
77 FR 27845; 77 FR 27847; 77 FR 27849; 77 FR 27850; 77 FR 29447; 77 FR
33558; 77 FR 38386; 78 FR 34143; 78 FR 41975; 78 FR 47818; 78 FR 52602;
78 FR 56986; 78 FR 63302; 78 FR 63307; 78 FR 64271; 78 FR 66099; 78 FR
67454; 78 FR 67462; 78 FR 76705; 78 FR 77780; 79 FR 1908; 79 FR 2748;
79 FR 4803; 79 FR 10606; 79 FR 10607; 79 FR 10608; 79 FR 10609; 79 FR
10611; 79 FR 12565; 79 FR 13085; 79 FR 14328; 79 FR 14331; 79 FR 14333;
79 FR 14571; 79 FR 15794; 79 FR 17641; 79 FR 18391; 79 FR 18392; 79 FR
21996; 79 FR 22000; 79 FR 22003; 79 FR 23797; 79 FR 27043; 79 FR 27365;
79 FR 28588; 79 FR 29495; 79 FR 29498; 80 FR 59225; 80 FR 67472; 80 FR
67476; 80 FR 67481; 80 FR 70060; 80 FR 76345; 80 FR 80443; 81 FR 1474;
81 FR 6573; 81 FR 11642; 81 FR 14190; 81 FR 15404; 81 FR 16265; 81 FR
17237; 81 FR 20433; 81 FR 20435; 81 FR 21647; 81 FR 21655; 81 FR 26305;
81 FR 28136; 81 FR 28138; 81 FR 39100; 81 FR 48493; 81 FR 52516; 81 FR
60117; 81 FR 66718; 81 FR 66724; 81 FR 66731; 81 FR 91239). They have
submitted evidence showing that the vision in the better eye continues
to meet the requirement specified at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) and that the
vision impairment is stable. In addition, a review of each record of
safety while driving with the respective vision deficiencies over the
past two years indicates each applicant continues to meet the vision
exemption requirements. These factors provide an adequate basis for
predicting each driver's ability to continue to drive safely in
interstate commerce. Therefore, FMCSA concludes that extending the
exemption for each renewal applicant for a period of two years is
likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the
exemption.
    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, the following
groups of drivers received renewed exemptions in the month of June and
are discussed below:
    As of June 2, 2018, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315, the following 72 individuals have satisfied the renewal
conditions for obtaining an exemption from the vision requirement in
the FMCSRs for interstate CMV drivers (66 FR 53826; 66 FR 66966; 68 FR
61860; 68 FR 69434; 68 FR 74699; 68 FR 75715; 69 FR 10503; 71 FR 6829;
70 FR 74102; 71 FR 14566; 71 FR 16410; 71 FR 30227; 72 FR 8417; 72 FR
36099; 72 FR 39879; 72 FR 46261; 72 FR 52419; 72 FR 54972; 72 FR 71998;
73 FR 8392; 73 FR 11989; 73 FR 15567; 73 FR 27014; 73 FR 27015; 74 FR
34394; 74 FR 60021; 74 FR 65846; 75 FR 1451; 75 FR 1835; 75 FR 8184; 75
FR 9482; 75 FR 13653; 75 FR 19674; 75 FR 27622; 76 FR 53708; 76 FR
70210; 76 FR 78729; 77 FR 3552; 77 FR 5874; 77 FR 7233; 77 FR 7657; 77
FR 10606; 77 FR 13691; 77 FR 15184; 77 FR 17107; 77 FR 17115; 77 FR
17117; 77 FR 19749; 77 FR 22059; 77 FR 22061; 77 FR 22838; 77 FR 23797;
77 FR 26816; 77 FR 27850; 78 FR 34143; 78 FR 41975; 78 FR 47818; 78 FR
52602; 78 FR 56986; 78 FR 63302; 78 FR 63307; 78 FR 64271; 78 FR 66099;
78 FR 67454; 78 FR 67462; 78 FR 76705; 78 FR 77780; 79 FR 1908; 79 FR
2748; 79 FR 4803; 79 FR 10606; 79 FR 10607; 79 FR 10608; 79 FR 10609;
79 FR 10611; 79 FR 12565; 79 FR 13085; 79 FR 14328; 79 FR 14331; 79 FR
14333; 79 FR 14571; 79 FR 15794; 79 FR 17641; 79 FR 18391; 79 FR 18392;
79 FR 21996; 79 FR 22000; 79 FR 22003; 79 FR 23797; 79 FR 28588; 79 FR
29498; 80 FR 59225; 80 FR 67472; 80 FR 67476; 80 FR 67481; 80 FR 70060;
80 FR 76345; 80 FR 80443; 81 FR 1474; 81 FR 6573; 81 FR 11642; 81 FR
14190; 81 FR 15404; 81 FR 16265; 81 FR 17237; 81 FR 20433; 81 FR 20435;
81 FR 21647; 81 FR 21655; 81 FR 26305; 81 FR 28136; 81 FR 39100; 81 FR
48493; 81 FR 52516; 81 FR 60117; 81 FR 66718; 81 FR 66724; 81 FR 66731;
81 FR 91239):

Stanley W. Ahne (OK)
John M. Alfano (MI)

Felix Barajas Ramirez (IL)
Alphonso A. Barco (SC)
Daniel C. Berry (AR)
Ronald D. Boeve (MI)
David A. Brannon (FL)
Paul T. Browning (MT)
Samuel S. Byler (PA)
Darrell Canupp (MI)
Laurence R. Casey (MA)
Valentin S. Chernyy (NE)
William Chisley (MD)
Cody W. Christian (OK)
Lorimer Christianson (IA)
Darrin G. Davis (WI)
Craig L. Dawson (OH)
Eric DeFrancesco (PA)
Eric C. Dettrey (NJ)
David Diamond (IL)
Ryan C. Dugan (NY)
Shorty M. Ellis (NC)
Robin S. England (GA)
Richard R. Filion (VT)
Roger L. Frazier (NC)
Juan Gallo-Gomez (CT)
Gregory T. Garris (OK)
Andeberhan O. Gidey (WA)
Jerry L. Gray (AL)
James R. Hammond (OH)
Daniel W. Henderson (TN)
Michael T. Huso (MN)
Andy R. Junod (TX)
Chet A. Keen (UT)
Roger W. Kerns (IA)
James M. Knef (NJ)
David Knobloch (MI)
Dennis J. Lessard (IN)
Christopher B. Liston (TN)
Larry P. Magrath (MN)
Jason E. Mallette (MS)
Stanley B. Marshall (GA)
Roberto C. Mendez (TX)
Jack D. Miller (OH)
Eugene C. Murphy (FL)
Donald A. Orloski (PA)
James C. Paschal, Jr. (GA)
Juan C. Ramirez (OH)
John L. Ratayczak (WI)
Michael L. Robinson (MO)
Danny L. Rolfe (ME)
Ricky D. Rostad (MN)
John Rueckert (SD)
Mark A. Sanders (OK)
Daniel W. Schafer (PA)
Joseph W. Schmit (NE)
Dale L. Schneider (IA)
Lawrence W. Sellers (AL)
Larry W. Slinker (VA)
William T. Smiley (MD)
Richard M. Smith (CO)
Richard H. Solum (MN)
Scott R. Sorensen (CA)
James A. Spell (MD)
Harry J. Stoever, Jr. (NJ)
Peter A. Troyan (MI)
James L. Urbach (PA)
Willard H. Weerts (IL)
Charles W. Williamson (OK)
Wesley A. Willis (NJ)
Donald E. Wojtaszek (PA)
Marvin S. Zimmerman (PA)

    The drivers were included in docket numbers FMCSA-2001-10578;
FMCSA-2003-15892; FMCSA-2003-16564; FMCSA-2006-24015; FMCSA-2007-26653;
FMCSA-2007-27897; FMCSA-2007-28695; FMCSA-2008-0021; FMCSA-2009-0321;
FMCSA-2011-0324; FMCSA-2011-0365; FMCSA-2011-0366; FMCSA-2011-0378;
FMCSA-2011-0379; FMCSA-2013-0029; FMCSA-2013-0030; FMCSA-2013-0165;
FMCSA-2013-0167; FMCSA-2013-0168; FMCSA-2013-0170; FMCSA-2013-0174;
FMCSA-2014-0002; FMCSA-2014-0003; FMCSA-2014-0004; FMCSA-2015-0070;
FMCSA-2015-0071; FMCSA-2015-0072; FMCSA-2015-0344; FMCSA-2015-0347;
FMCSA-2015-0348; FMCSA-2015-0350; FMCSA-2015-0351; FMCSA-2016-0024;
FMCSA-2016-0025; FMCSA-2016-0027. Their exemptions are applicable as of
June 2, 2018, and will expire on June 2, 2020.
    As of June 3, 2018, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315, the following 19 individuals have satisfied the renewal
conditions for obtaining an exemption from the vision requirement in
the FMCSRs for interstate CMV drivers (64 FR 68195; 65 FR 20251; 65 FR
45817; 65 FR 77066; 67 FR 38311; 68 FR 1654; 69 FR 17263; 69 FR 26921;
69 FR 31447; 70 FR 7545; 71 FR 13450; 71 FR 27033; 71 FR 4194; 73 FR
11989; 73 FR 16950; 73 FR 28186; 73 FR 6242; 73 FR 9158; 74 FR 60022;
75 FR 4623; 75 FR 9477; 75 FR 9484; 75 FR 14656; 75 FR 27623; 75 FR
28682; 77 FR 10606; 77 FR 13689; 77 FR 15184; 77 FR 17107; 77 FR 17109;
77 FR 27845; 77 FR 27849; 77 FR 27850; 77 FR 29447; 79 FR 14328; 79 FR
14331; 79 FR 14571; 79 FR 18391; 79 FR 18392; 79 FR 21996; 79 FR 27043;
79 FR 28588; 79 FR 29498; 81 FR 28138):

Rodney R. Anderson (PA)
Ernie E. Black (NC)
Gary O. Brady (WV)
Marland L. Brassfield (TX)
Michael B. Canedy (MN)
Melvin D. Clark (GA)
Rojelio Garcia-Pena (MI)
Grant G. Gibson (MN)
Stephen H. Goldcamp (OH)
Wai F. King (IL)
Eric W. Kopmann (MO)
Dennis E. Krone (IL)
George E. Lewis (OH)
Travis J. Luce (MI)
Richard J. McKenzie, Jr. (MD)
Christopher J. Meerten (OR)
Jason T. Montoya (NM)
George S. Rayson (OH)
Carl D. Short (MO)
    The drivers were included in docket numbers FMCSA-1999-6480; FMCSA-
2000-7363; FMCSA-2004-17195; FMCSA-2005-23099; FMCSA-2007-0071; FMCSA-
2009-0303; FMCSA-2010-0050; FMCSA-2011-0379; FMCSA-2011-0380; FMCSA-
2014-0003; FMCSA-2014-0004. Their exemptions are applicable as of June
3, 2018, and will expire on June 3, 2020.
    As of June 6, 2018, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315, the following two individuals have satisfied the renewal
conditions for obtaining an exemption from the vision requirement in
the FMCSRs for interstate CMV drivers (77 FR 23799; 77 FR 33558; 79 FR
27365; 81 FR 28138): Richard Doroba, (IL); Tommy Thomas, (CA).
    The drivers were included in docket number FMCSA-2012-0040. Their
exemptions are applicable as of June 6, 2018, and will expire on June
6, 2020.
    As of June 27, 2018, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315, the following two individuals have satisfied the renewal
conditions for obtaining an exemption from the vision requirement in
the FMCSRs for interstate CMV drivers (77 FR 27847; 77 FR 38386; 79 FR
29495; 81 FR 28138): Matthew G. Epps, (FL); James E. Sikkink, (IL).
    The drivers were included in docket number FMCSA-2012-0104. Their
exemptions are applicable as of June 27, 2018, and will expire on June
27, 2020.

IV. Conditions and Requirements

    The exemptions are extended subject to the following conditions:
(1) Each driver must undergo an annual physical examination (a) by an
ophthalmologist or optometrist who attests that the vision in the
better eye continues to meet the requirements in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10),
and (b) by a certified Medical Examiner, as defined by 49 CFR 390.5,
who attests that the driver is otherwise physically qualified under 49
CFR 391.41; (2) each driver must provide a copy of the
ophthalmologist's or optometrist's report to the Medical Examiner at
the time of the annual medical examination; and (3) each driver must
provide a copy of the annual medical certification to the employer for
retention in the driver's qualification file or keep a copy of his/her
driver's qualification if he/her is self- employed. The driver must
also have a copy of the exemption when driving, for presentation to a
duly authorized Federal, State, or local enforcement official. The
exemption will be rescinded if: (1) The person fails to comply with the
terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted
in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was granted;
or (3) continuation of the

exemption would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49
U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315.

V. Preemption

    During the period the exemption is in effect, no State shall
enforce any law or regulation that conflicts with this exemption with
respect to a person operating under the exemption.

VI. Conclusion

    Based upon its evaluation of the 95 exemption applications, FMCSA
renews the exemptions of the aforementioned drivers from the vision
requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), subject to the requirements cited
above. In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each exemption
will be valid for two years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA.

    Issued on: June 11, 2018.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-13004 Filed 6-15-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 37 (Monday, February 27, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11957-11958]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03849]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, the Securities and
Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, March 1,
2017, at 10:00 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:
     The Commission will consider whether to issue a request
for comment on possible revisions to statistical and other disclosures
affecting registrants in the financial services industry.
     The Commission will consider whether to adopt rule and
form amendments to require registrants that file registration
statements or reports subject to the exhibit requirements under Item
601 of Regulation S-K, or that file Forms F-10 or 20-F, to include a
hyperlink to each exhibit listed in the exhibit index of these filings,
and to require registrants to submit such registration statements and
reports on EDGAR in HTML format.
     The Commission will consider whether to propose amendments
to rules and forms to require the use of the Inline XBRL format for the
submission of operating company financial statement information and
mutual fund risk/return summaries, eliminate the requirement for filers
to post Interactive Data Files on their Web sites and terminate the
Commission's voluntary program for the submission of financial

statement information interactive data that is currently available only
to investment companies and certain other entities.
     The Commission will consider whether to propose amendments
to Rule 15c2-12 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which would
amend the list of event notices that a broker, dealer, or municipal
securities dealer acting as an underwriter in a primary offering of
municipal securities, must reasonably determine that an issuer or an
obligated person has undertaken, in a written agreement or contract for
the benefit of holders of the municipal securities, to provide to the
Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The proposed amendments would
add two event notices relating to certain financial obligations
incurred by issuers and obligated persons.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted, or postponed, please contact Brent J. Fields in
the Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 22, 2017.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-03849 Filed 2-23-17; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


09-20-2010		EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0564

List of Websites with Technical Documents for Case 6057 – Beauveria
bassiana

RAL: Shanaz Bacchus    USEPA/OPP/BPPD/7511P

Below is a list of websites that provide information about registered
strains of Beauveria bassiana.  To access these websites, either type in
or copy and paste the link into your browser.  Or obtain these documents
by directly accessing the BPPD website at:
http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/ingredients/index_ab.htm#b

Beauveria bassiana Strain 447

http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/ingredients/factsheets/factshe
et_128815.htm

Beauveria bassiana ATCC 74040 - Technical document

http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/ingredients/tech_docs/tech_128
818.htm

Beauveria bassiana strain GHA – Technical document

http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/ingredients/factsheets/factshe
et_128924.htm

Beauveria bassiana strain HF23 – Biopesticide Registration Action
Document (BRAD)

http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/ingredients/tech_docs/brad_090
305.pdf


required in Sec.  60.765(a)(3)(iii) or (a)(5)(iii), keep a record of
the root cause analysis conducted, the corrective action analysis, the
date for corrective action(s) already completed following the positive
pressure reading or high temperature reading, for action(s) not already
completed, a schedule for implementation, including proposed
commencement and completion dates, and a copy of any comments or final
approval on the corrective action analysis or schedule from the
regulatory agency.
    (f) Landfill owners or operators who convert design capacity from
volume to mass or mass to volume to demonstrate that landfill design
capacity is less than 2.5 million megagrams or 2.5 million cubic
meters, as provided in the definition of ``design capacity'', must keep
readily accessible, on-site records of the annual recalculation of
site-specific density, design capacity, and the supporting
documentation. Off-site records may be maintained if they are
retrievable within 4 hours. Either paper copy or electronic formats are
acceptable.
    (g) Landfill owners or operators seeking to demonstrate that site-
specific surface methane emissions are below 500 parts per million by
conducting surface emission monitoring under the Tier 4 procedures
specified in Sec.  60.764(a)(6) must keep for at least 5 years up-to-
date, readily accessible records of all surface emissions monitoring
and information related to monitoring instrument calibrations conducted
according to sections 8 and 10 of Method 21 of appendix A of this part,
including all of the following items:
    (1) Calibration records:

    (i) Date of calibration and initials of operator performing the
calibration.
    (ii) Calibration gas cylinder identification, certification date,
and certified concentration.
    (iii) Instrument scale(s) used.
    (iv) A description of any corrective action taken if the meter
readout could not be adjusted to correspond to the calibration gas
value.
    (v) If an owner or operator makes their own calibration gas, a
description of the procedure used.
    (2) Digital photographs of the instrument setup, including the wind
barrier. The photographs must be time and date-stamped and taken at the
first sampling location prior to sampling and at the last sampling
location after sampling at the end of each sampling day, for the
duration of the Tier 4 monitoring demonstration.
    (3) Timestamp of each surface scan reading:
    (i) Timestamp should be detailed to the nearest second, based on
when the sample collection begins.
    (ii) A log for the length of time each sample was taken using a
stopwatch (e.g., the time the probe was held over the area).
    (4) Location of each surface scan reading. The owner or operator
must determine the coordinates using an instrument with an accuracy of
at least 4 meters. Coordinates must be in decimal degrees with at least
five decimal places.
    (5) Monitored methane concentration (parts per million) of each
reading.
    (6) Background methane concentration (parts per million) after each
instrument calibration test.
    (7) Adjusted methane concentration using most recent calibration
(parts per million).
    (8) For readings taken at each surface penetration, the unique
identification location label matching the label specified in paragraph
(d) of this section.
    (9) Records of the operating hours of the gas collection system for
each destruction device.
    (h) Except as provided in Sec.  60.767(c)(2), each owner or
operator subject to the provisions of this subpart must keep for at
least 5 years up-to-date, readily accessible records of all collection
and control system monitoring data for parameters measured in Sec.
60.766(a)(1), (2), and (3).
    (i) Any records required to be maintained by this subpart that are
submitted electronically via the EPA's CDX may be maintained in
electronic format.
    (j) For each owner or operator reporting leachate or other liquids
addition under Sec.  60.767(k), keep records of any engineering
calculations or company records used to estimate the quantities of
leachate or liquids added, the surface areas for which the leachate or
liquids were applied, and the estimates of annual waste acceptance or
total waste in place in the areas where leachate or liquids were
applied.

Sec.  60.769  Specifications for active collection systems.

    (a) Each owner or operator seeking to comply with Sec.
60.762(b)(2)(i) must site active collection wells, horizontal
collectors, surface collectors, or other extraction devices at a
sufficient density throughout all gas producing areas using the
following procedures unless alternative procedures have been approved
by the Administrator as provided in Sec.  60.767(c)(2) and (3):
    (1) The collection devices within the interior must be certified to
achieve comprehensive control of surface gas emissions by a
professional engineer. The following issues must be addressed in the
design: Depths of refuse, refuse gas generation rates and flow
characteristics, cover properties, gas system expandability, leachate
and condensate management, accessibility, compatibility with filling
operations, integration with closure end use, air intrusion control,
corrosion resistance, fill settlement, resistance to the refuse
decomposition heat, and ability to isolate individual components or
sections for repair or troubleshooting without shutting down entire
collection system.
    (2) The sufficient density of gas collection devices determined in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section must address landfill gas migration
issues and augmentation of the collection system through the use of
active or passive systems at the landfill perimeter or exterior.
    (3) The placement of gas collection devices determined in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section must control all gas producing areas, except as
provided by paragraphs (a)(3)(i) and (ii) of this section.
    (i) Any segregated area of asbestos or nondegradable material may
be excluded from collection if documented as provided under Sec.
60.768(d). The documentation must provide the nature, date of
deposition, location and amount of asbestos or nondegradable material
deposited in the area, and must be provided to the Administrator upon
request.
    (ii) Any nonproductive area of the landfill may be excluded from
control, provided that the total of all excluded areas can be shown to
contribute less than 1 percent of the total amount of NMOC emissions
from the landfill. The amount, location, and age of the material must
be documented and provided to the Administrator upon request. A
separate NMOC emissions estimate must be made for each section proposed
for exclusion, and the sum of all such sections must be compared to the
NMOC emissions estimate for the entire landfill.
    (A) The NMOC emissions from each section proposed for exclusion
must be computed using Equation 7:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR29AU16.013

Where:

Qi = NMOC emission rate from the i\th\ section, megagrams
per year.
k = Methane generation rate constant, year-1.
Lo = Methane generation potential, cubic meters per
megagram solid waste.
Mi = Mass of the degradable solid waste in the
ith section, megagram.
ti = Age of the solid waste in the ith
section, years.
CNMOC = Concentration of nonmethane organic compounds,
parts per million by volume.
3.6 x 10-\9\ = Conversion factor.

    (B) If the owner/operator is proposing to exclude, or cease gas
collection and control from, nonproductive physically separated (e.g.,
separately lined) closed areas that already have gas collection
systems, NMOC emissions from each physically separated closed area must
be computed using either Equation 3 in Sec.  60.764(b) or Equation 7 in
paragraph (a)(3)(ii)(A) of this section.
    (iii) The values for k and CNMOC determined in field
testing must be used if field testing has been performed in determining
the NMOC emission rate or the radii of influence (this distance from
the well center to a point in the landfill where the pressure gradient
applied by the blower or compressor approaches zero). If field testing
has not been performed, the default values for k, Lo and
CNMOC provided in Sec.  60.764(a)(1) or the alternative
values from Sec.  60.764(a)(5) must be used. The mass of nondegradable
solid waste contained

within the given section may be subtracted from the total mass of the
section when estimating emissions provided the nature, location, age,
and amount of the nondegradable material is documented as provided in
paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section.
    (b) Each owner or operator seeking to comply with Sec.
60.762(b)(2)(ii)(A) construct the gas collection devices using the
following equipment or procedures:
    (1) The landfill gas extraction components must be constructed of
polyvinyl chloride (PVC), high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe,
fiberglass, stainless steel, or other nonporous corrosion resistant
material of suitable dimensions to: Convey projected amounts of gases;
withstand installation, static, and settlement forces; and withstand
planned overburden or traffic loads. The collection system must extend
as necessary to comply with emission and migration standards.
Collection devices such as wells and horizontal collectors must be
perforated to allow gas entry without head loss sufficient to impair
performance across the intended extent of control. Perforations must be
situated with regard to the need to prevent excessive air infiltration.
    (2) Vertical wells must be placed so as not to endanger underlying
liners and must address the occurrence of water within the landfill.
Holes and trenches constructed for piped wells and horizontal
collectors must be of sufficient cross-section so as to allow for their
proper construction and completion including, for example, centering of
pipes and placement of gravel backfill. Collection devices must be
designed so as not to allow indirect short circuiting of air into the
cover or refuse into the collection system or gas into the air. Any
gravel used around pipe perforations should be of a dimension so as not
to penetrate or block perforations.
    (3) Collection devices may be connected to the collection header
pipes below or above the landfill surface. The connector assembly must
include a positive closing throttle valve, any necessary seals and
couplings, access couplings and at least one sampling port. The
collection devices must be constructed of PVC, HDPE, fiberglass,
stainless steel, or other nonporous material of suitable thickness.
    (c) Each owner or operator seeking to comply with Sec.
60.762(b)(2)(iii) must convey the landfill gas to a control system in
compliance with Sec.  60.762(b)(2)(iii) through the collection header
pipe(s). The gas mover equipment must be sized to handle the maximum
gas generation flow rate expected over the intended use period of the
gas moving equipment using the following procedures:
    (1) For existing collection systems, the flow data must be used to
project the maximum flow rate. If no flow data exists, the procedures
in paragraph (c)(2) of this section must be used.
    (2) For new collection systems, the maximum flow rate must be in
accordance with Sec.  60.765(a)(1).

[FR Doc. 2016-17687 Filed 8-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: June 23, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 121)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35348-35350]
[DOCID:fr23jn08-9]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2008-0272]
RIN 1625-AA87

Security Zone; Patapsco River, Middle Branch, Baltimore, MD

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone on
certain waters of the Patapsco River, Middle Branch, in Baltimore
Harbor, Baltimore, Maryland, during the USS STERETT Commissioning
ceremony. The security zone is necessary to provide for the security of
the USS STERETT and the safety of life of event participants,
spectators and mariners on U.S. navigable waters during the event.
Entry into the zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 4 p.m. through 11 p.m. on August 9,
2008.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in
the docket, are part of docket USCG-2008-0272 and are available online
at http://www.regulations.gov. This material is also available for
inspection or copying at two locations: the Docket Management Facility
(M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140,

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays and the Commander,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road, Building
70, Waterways Management Division, Baltimore, Maryland 21226-1791
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call Mr. Ronald Houck, at Coast Guard Sector Baltimore,
Waterways Management Division, at telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER> or
(410) 576-2693. If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee
V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    On April 23, 2008, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Security Zone; Patapsco River, Middle Branch,
Baltimore, MD'' in the Federal Register (73 FR 21883). We received no
letters commenting on the proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested, and none was held.

Background and Purpose

    The ongoing hostilities in Afghanistan and Iraq have made it
prudent for U.S. ports and waterways to be on a higher state of alert
because the al Qaeda organization and other similar organizations have
declared an ongoing intention to conduct armed attacks on U.S.
interests worldwide. Due to increased awareness that future terrorist
attacks are possible the Coast Guard, as lead federal agency for
maritime homeland security, has determined that the Coast Guard Captain
of the Port must have the means to be aware of, deter, detect,
intercept, and respond to asymmetric threats, acts of aggression, and
attacks by terrorists on the American homeland while still maintaining
our freedoms and sustaining the flow of commerce. This security zone is
part of a comprehensive port security regime designed to safeguard
human life, vessels, and waterfront facilities against sabotage or
terrorist attacks.
    The Captain of the Port Baltimore is establishing a security zone
to address the aforementioned security concerns and to take steps to
prevent the catastrophic impact that a terrorist attack against the USS
STERETT and a large number of participants at the South Locust Point
Marine Terminal, and the surrounding waterfront areas and communities,
in Baltimore, Maryland. The security zone is necessary to safeguard
life and property on the navigable waters immediately before, during,
and after the scheduled event. This zone will help the Coast Guard
prevent vessels or persons from bypassing the security measures
established on shore for the ceremony and engaging in waterborne
terrorist actions during the highly-publicized event.

Discussion of Comments and Changes

    The Coast Guard received no comments in response to the NPRM. No
public meeting was requested and none was held. Other than two
technical changes--revising the temporary section number (from Sec.
165.T08-0272 to Sec.  165.T05-0272) so that it reflects security zone
in the Coast Guard's Fifth District, and revising the word ``rule'' to
``section'' in the effective period paragraph--we have made no changes
from the proposed rule.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. There is little vessel traffic associated
with recreational boating and commercial fishing in the area during the
effective period.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule affects the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of the Patapsco River, Middle Branch,
from 4 p.m. through 11 p.m. on August 9, 2008. Smaller vessels not
constrained by their draft, which are more likely to be small entities,
may transit around the security zone. The duration of the security zone
will be limited to seven hours. Because the zone is of limited size and
duration, it is expected that there will be minimal disruption to the
maritime community. Before the effective period, we will issue maritime
advisories widely available to users of the river.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a

State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one year. Though this rule will
not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. This rule establishes a security zone.
    A final environmental analysis checklist and a final categorical
exclusion determination will be available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T05-0272 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T05-0272  Security Zone; Patapsco River, Middle Branch,
Baltimore, MD.

    (a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All waters of
the Patapsco River, Middle Branch, from surface to bottom, encompassed
by lines connecting the following points, beginning at 39[deg]15'40''
N, 076[deg]35'23'' W, thence to 39[deg]15'24'' N, 076[deg]35'18'' W,
thence to 39[deg]15'25'' N, 076[deg]35'54'' W, thence to 39[deg]15'43''
N, 076[deg]35'58'' W, located approximately 1,600 yards east of the
Hanover Street (SR-2) Bridge. These coordinates are based upon North
American Datum 1983.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, for purposes of enforcing
the security zone identified in paragraph (a) of this section,
designated representative means on-scene Coast Guard patrol personnel,
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers and other officers
operating Coast Guard vessels, and federal, state, and local officers
designated by the Captain of the Port Baltimore.
    (c) Regulations. (1) All persons are required to comply with the
general regulations governing security zones found in Sec.  165.33 of
this part.
    (2) Entry into or remaining in the security zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section is prohibited unless authorized by the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port Baltimore, Maryland or his or her
designated representative.
    (3) Persons desiring to transit the area of the security zone may
contact the Captain of the Port Baltimore at telephone number 410-576-
2674 or on marine band radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) to seek
permission to transit the area. On-scene Coast Guard patrol personnel
operating Coast Guard vessels may be contacted on marine band radio
VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) to seek permission to transit the area.
Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel shall proceed
as directed. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must
comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Baltimore or
his or her designated representative.
    (d) Effective period. This section is effective from 4 p.m. through
11 p.m. on August 9, 2008.

    Dated: June 12, 2008.
Brian D. Kelley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland.
[FR Doc. E8-14130 Filed 6-20-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


[Federal Register: April 27, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 80)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 21983-21985]
[DOCID:fr27ap10-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30718; Amdt. No. 3368]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective April 27, 2010. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of April 27, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_
federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability--All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available
online free of charge. Visit http://www.nfdc.faa.gov to register.
Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may
be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harry J. Hodges, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS-420), Flight Technologies and Programs Divisions,
Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by establishing,
amending, suspending, or revoking SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and/or ODPs.
The complete regulators description of each SIAP and its associated
Takeoff Minimums or ODP for an identified airport is listed on FAA form
documents which are incorporated by reference in this amendment under 5
U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR part 97.20. The applicable FAA
Forms are FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4,

8260-5, 8260-15A, and 8260-15B when required by an entry on 8260-15A.
    The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, in addition
to their complex nature and the need for a special format make
publication in the Federal Register expensive and impractical.
Furthermore, airmen do not use the regulatory text of the SIAPs,
Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead refer to their depiction on
charts printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. The advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on
FAA forms is unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR
sections and specifies the types of SIAPs and the effective dates of
the associated Takeoff Minimums and ODPs. This amendment also
identifies the airport and its location, the procedure, and the
amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP as contained in the
transmittal. Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and textual ODP amendments
may have been issued previously by the FAA in a Flight Data Center
(FDC) Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency action of immediate
flight safety relating directly to published aeronautical charts. The
circumstances which created the need for some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums
and ODP amendments may require making them effective in less than 30
days. For the remaining SIAPS and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, an
effective date at least 30 days after publication is provided.
    Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these SIAPS and
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the affected airports. Because of
the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and
public procedures before adopting these SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and
ODPs are impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where
applicable, that good cause exists for making some SIAPs effective in
less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air Traffic Control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (Air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 2, 2010.
John M. Allen,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) is amended by
establishing, amending, suspending, or revoking Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums and/or Obstacle Departure
Procedures effective at 0902 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

Effective 6 MAY 2010

Smithfield, NC, Johnston County, NDB OR GPS RWY 21, Amdt 6,
CANCELLED
Montgomery, NY, Orange County, ILS OR LOC RWY 3, Amdt 3A
Montgomery, NY, Orange County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Amdt 1A
Mount Pleasant, SC, Mt. Pleasant Rgnl-Faison Field, Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1
Mount Pleasant, SC, Mt. Pleasant Rgnl-Faison Field, VOR/DME-A, Amdt
1
Mount Pleasant, SC, Mt. Pleasant Rgnl-Faison Field, VOR/DME RNAV OR
GPS RWY 17, Orig, CANCELLED
Fayetteville, TN, Fayetteville Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 20, Amdt 1A
Paris, TN, Henry County, ILS OR LOC/NDB RWY 2, Amdt 1
Paris, TN, Henry County, NDB RWY 2, Amdt 3
Paris, TN, Henry County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 2, Orig
Paris, TN, Henry County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 20, Amdt 1

Effective 3 JUN 2010

Anniston, AL, Anniston Metropolitan, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Amdt 1
Anniston, AL, Anniston Metropolitan, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 23, Amdt 1
Anniston, AL, Anniston Metropolitan, RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 23, Orig
Hamilton, AL, Marion County-Rankin Fite, VOR RWY 18, Amdt 5
Ash Flat, AR, Sharp County Rgnl, NDB RWY 4, Amdt 1D, CANCELLED
Batesville, AR, Batesville Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 7, Amdt 1
Fort Smith, AR, Fort Smith Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 1, Amdt 2
Fort Smith, AR, Fort Smith Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 7, Amdt 1
Fort Smith, AR, Fort Smith Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 25, Amdt 1
Ozark, AR, Ozark-Franklin County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Orig
Ozark, AR, Ozark-Franklin County, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 2
Napa, CA, Napa County, NAPAA ONE Graphic Obstacle DP
Napa, CA, Napa County, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 4
San Diego, CA, Brown Field Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 4
Jacksonville, FL, Cecil Field, GPS RWY 9R, Orig, CANCELLED
Jacksonville, FL, Cecil Field, GPS RWY 18L, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Jacksonville, FL, Cecil Field, GPS RWY 27L, Orig, CANCELLED
Jacksonville, FL, Cecil Field, GPS RWY 36R, Orig, CANCELLED
Jacksonville, FL, Cecil Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18L, Orig
Jacksonville, FL, Cecil Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36R, Orig
Panama City, FL, Northwest Florida-Panama City Intl, ILS OR LOC/DME
RWY 16, Orig-A
Panama City, FL, Northwest Florida-Panama City Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY
16, Orig-A
Panama City, FL, Northwest Florida-Panama City Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY
34, Orig-A
West Palm Beach, FL, Palm Beach Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 14, Amdt 2A
Ames, IA, Ames Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 4
Cedar Rapids, IA, The Eastern Iowa, RNAV (GPS) RWY 8, Orig
Cedar Rapids, IA, The Eastern Iowa, RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Orig
Cedar Rapids, IA, The Eastern Iowa, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Amdt 3
Cedar Rapids, IA, The Eastern Iowa, VOR/DME RWY 8, Orig
Cedar Rapids, IA, The Eastern Iowa, VOR RWY 26, Orig
Effingham, IL, Effingham County Memorial, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 5
Shelbyville, IL, Shelby County, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Orig

Crawfordsville, IN, Crawfordsville Muni, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Orig
Chanute, KS, Chanute Martin Johnson, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig
Chanute, KS, Chanute Martin Johnson, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Orig
Chanute, KS, Chanute Martin Johnson, VOR-A, Amdt 10
Chanute, KS, Chanute Martin Johnson, VOR/DME RNAV OR (GPS) RWY 36,
Amdt 3C, CANCELLED
Coffeyville, KS, Coffeyville Muni, NDB RWY 35, Amdt 1
Baton Rouge, LA, Baton Rouge Metro, Ryan Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 13,
Amdt 1
Baton Rouge, LA, Baton Rouge Metro, Ryan Field, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 1
Lake Charles, LA, Chennault Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, Amdt 1
Lake Charles, LA, Chennault Intl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Orig
Cassville, MO, Cassville Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Orig
Cassville, MO, Cassville Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Orig
Cassville, MO, Cassville Muni, VOR RWY 9, Amdt 2
Kennett, MO, Kennett Memorial, NDB RWY 2, Orig, CANCELLED
Kennett, MO, Kennett Memorial, NDB RWY 20, Orig, CANCELLED
Lebanon, MO, Floyd W Jones Lebanon, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Orig
Madison, MS, Bruce Campbell Field, VOR-A, Amdt 10
Madison, MS, Bruce Campbell Field, VOR/DME-B, Amdt 5
Endicott, NY, Tri-Cities, GPS RWY 21, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Endicott, NY, Tri-Cities, RNAV (GPS) RWY 3, Orig
Endicott, NY, Tri-Cities, RNAV (GPS) RWY 21, Orig
Endicott, NY, Tri-Cities, VOR-A, Amdt 5
Rochester, NY, Greater Rochester Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 22, Amdt 7
Rochester, NY, Greater Rochester Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Amdt 1
Buffalo, OK, Buffalo Muni, NDB-A, Amdt 3
North Bend, OR, Southwest Oregon Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Amdt 5
Dubois, PA, Dubois Rgnl, ILS OR LOC RWY 25, Amdt 9
Dubois, PA, Dubois Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 7, Amdt 1
Dubois, PA, Dubois Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 25, Amdt 1
Dubois, PA, Dubois Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2
Dubois, PA, Dubois Rgnl, VOR/DME RWY 7, Amdt 4
Williamsport, PA, Williamsport Rgnl, ILS OR LOC RWY 27, Amdt 16A
Chamberlain, SD, Chamberlain Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Orig
Canadian, TX, Hemphill County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Amdt 1
Graford, TX, Possum Kingdom, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig-
A
Higgins, TX, Higgins-Lipscomb County, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Orig
Higgins, TX, Higgins-Lipscomb County, VOR/DME-A, Amdt 1
Perryton, TX, Perryton Ochiltree County, NDB-A, Amdt 4
Perryton, TX, Perryton Ochiltree County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Orig
Perryton, TX, Perryton Ochiltree County, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Orig
Rockport, TX, Aransas County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Amdt 3
Rockport, TX, Aransas County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Orig
Rockport, TX, Aransas County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig
Rockport, TX, Aransas County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig
Hot Springs, VA, Ingalls Field, GPS RWY 25, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Hot Springs, VA, Ingalls Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 25, Orig
West Point, VA, Middle Peninsula Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Amdt 1
Wenatchee, WA, Pangborn Memorial, RNAV (RNP) RWY 30, Orig
Fairmont, WV, Fairmont Muni Frankman Field, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 6

[FR Doc. 2010-8836 Filed 4-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P