[Federal Register: November 9, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 217)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 63535-63537]
[DOCID:fr09no07-30]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 82

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-5065; FRL-8493-4]
RIN 2060-AO32

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Revision of Refrigerant
Recovery and Recycling Equipment Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
update motor vehicle refrigerant recovery and recycling equipment
standards. Under Clean Air Act Section 609, motor vehicle air-
conditioning (MVAC) refrigerant handling equipment must be certified by
the Administrator or an independent organization approved by the
Administrator and, at a minimum, must be as stringent as the standards
of the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) in effect as of the date
of the enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. In 1997, EPA
promulgated regulations that required the use of SAE Standard J2210,
HFC-134a Recycling Equipment for Mobile Air Conditioning Systems for
certification of MVAC refrigerant handling equipment. SAE has replaced
Standard J2210 with J2788, Recovery/Recycle and Recovery/Recycle/
Recharging Equipment for HFC-134a Refrigerant. To avoid confusion, EPA
is updating its reference to include the new SAE standards. This action
reflects a change in industry standard practice. This action proposes
to revise the EPA

addresses to send equipment certification forms.

DATES: Written comments or a request for a public hearing must be
received by December 10, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No EPA-HQ-OAR-
2006-5065, by mail to Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode 6102T,
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20460. Comments may also be submitted electronically or through hand
delivery/courier by following the detailed instructions in the
ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule located in the rules section
of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Thundiyil, Stratospheric
Protection Division, Office of Atmospheric Programs (MC 6205J),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number
(202) 343-2363; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the ``Rules and Regulations'' Section of
this Federal Register, we are updating the existing motor vehicle
refrigerant recovery and recycling equipment standards, as a direct
final rule without a prior proposed rule. If we receive no adverse
comment or a request for a public hearing, we will not take further
action on this proposed rule.

I. Why is EPA Issuing This Proposed Rule?

    This document proposes to take action on motor vehicle air-
conditioning refrigerant recovery and recycling equipment standards. We
have published a direct final rule updating EPA's motor vehicle
refrigerant recovery and recycling equipment standards in the ``Rules
and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register because we view this
as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment. We have
explained our reasons for this action in the preamble to the direct
final rule.
    If we receive no adverse comment or a request for a public hearing,
we will not take further action on this proposed rule. If we receive
adverse comment or request, we will withdraw the direct final rule and
it will not take effect. We would address all public comments in any
subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule.
    We do not intend to institute a second comment period on this
action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
For further information, please see the information provided in the
ADDRESSES section of this document.

II. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

    This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order (EO) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and
is therefore not subject to review under the EO.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This action does not impose any new information collection burden.
The recordkeeping and reporting requirements included in this action
are already included in an existing information collection burden. This
action does not make any changes that would affect burden. However, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has previously approved the
information collection requirements contained in the existing
regulations, 40 CFR part 82, under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and has assigned OMB control
number 2060-0247, EPA ICR number 1617.05. A copy of the OMB approved
Information Collection Request (ICR) may be obtained from Susan Auby,
Collection Strategies Division; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(2822T); 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460 or by
calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy may also downloaded from http://www.regulations.gov
.

    Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The RFA generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
Small entities include small businesses, small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions. For purposes of assessing the impacts of
today's rule on small entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small
business as defined by the Small Business Administration's (SBA)
regulations at 13 CFR 121.201; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction
that is a government of a city, county, town, school district or
special district with a population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small
organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise which is
independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.
    After considering the economic impacts of today's rule on small
entities, we certify that this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
requirements of today's rule do not mandate a switch to the new SAE
equipment standards. Rather, as MVAC service shop owners replace end-
of-life refrigerant handling equipment, owners will purchase equipment
certified to the new SAE standard.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, EPA
generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that
may result in expenditures to State, local, and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any
one year. Before promulgating an EPA rule for which a written statement
is needed, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires EPA to identify
and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt
the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule. The provisions of section 205
do not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law. Moreover,
section 205 allows EPA to adopt an alternative other

than the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome
alternative if the Administrator publishes with the final rule an
explanation why that alternative was not adopted. Before EPA
establishes any regulatory requirements that may significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, including tribal governments, it
must have developed under section 203 of the UMRA a small government
agency plan. The plan must provide for notifying potentially affected
small governments, enabling officials of affected small governments to
have meaningful and timely input in the development of EPA regulatory
proposals with significant Federal intergovernmental mandates, and
informing, educating, and advising small governments on compliance with
the regulatory requirements.
    EPA has determined that this rule does not contain a Federal
mandate that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more for
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or the private
sector in any one year. Today's rule does not affect State, local, or
tribal governments. The impact of this rule on the private sector will
be less than $100 million per year. Thus, today's rule is not subject
to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA. EPA has
determined that this rule contains no regulatory requirements that
might significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This
regulation does not apply to governmental entities.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132. This regulation applies directly to
facilities that use these substances and not to governmental entities.
Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this rule.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000),
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' This final rule does not have
tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175. It does not
significantly or uniquely affect the communities of Indian tribal
governments, because this regulation applies directly to facilities
that use these substances and not to governmental entities. Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    Executive Order 13045: ``Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) applies
to any rule that: (1) Is determined to be ``economically significant''
as defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may
have a disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action
meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health
or safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the
planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and
reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.
    EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that are based on health or safety risks, such that
the analysis required under section 5-501 of the Order has the
potential to influence the regulation. This rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it is based on technology performance and
not on health or safety risks.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)) because it is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    As noted in the proposed rule, Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law
104-113, Section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs EPA to use
voluntary consensus standards in regulatory activities unless to do so
would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., materials
specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and business
practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA to provide Congress, through
OMB, explanations when the Agency decides not to use available and
applicable voluntary consensus standards. This rulemaking explicitly
references technical standards; EPA uses the SAE revision versions of
J2210. These standards can be obtained from http://www.sae.org/technical/standards/
.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 82

    Environmental protection, Motor vehicle air-conditioning, Recover/
recycle equipment, Recover/recycle/recharge equipment, Reporting and
certification requirements, Stratospheric ozone layer.

    Dated: November 2, 2007.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
 [FR Doc. E7-21941 Filed 11-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 159 (Monday, August 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48783-48785]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19473]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-72815; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2014-65]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule 935NY and
Rule 964NY To Delete Obsolete References to Tracking Orders and Make
Other Non-Substantive, Technical Changes to the Exchange Rules

August 12, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on July 31, 2014, NYSE MKT LLC (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE MKT'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 935NY (Order Exposure
Requirements) and Rule 964NY (Display, Priority and Order Allocation--
Trading Systems) to delete obsolete references to Tracking Orders and
make other non-substantive, technical changes to the Exchange rules.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange recently filed and received approval of a rule change
amending rules governing Exchange order types, which included the
deletion of Tracking Orders, an order type which had been deemed
obsolete due to a lack of demand by market participants.\3\ When the
Exchange eliminated Tracking Orders, references to Tracking Orders were
inadvertently left in Rule 935NY and Rule 964NY. This filing is
intended to correct that oversight by deleting the references to
Tracking Orders that are no longer relevant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities and Exchange Release 71630 (February 27,
2014), 79 FR 12553 (March 5, 2014) (SR-NYSEMKT-2014-05).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    First, the Exchange is proposing to delete Commentary .05 to Rule
935NY to eliminate reference to Tracking Orders, which as noted are no
longer valid for use on the Exchange, and to designate Commentary .05
as Reserved.
    Similarly, the Exchange is proposing to delete section (F) from
Rule 964NY(b)(2) to delete reference to Tracking Orders. In addition,
the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 964NY(c)(2)(E) by combining
subsections (ii) and (iii), in doing so the Exchange would eliminate
reference to Tracking Orders and would update the subsequent rule text
in that section to accurately describe the functionality now that
Tracking Orders are no longer valid. In light of the foregoing change,
the Exchange believes it is also appropriate to amend the paragraph
following former subsection Rule 964NY(c)(2)(E)(iii) by deleting the
clause bracketed below, as the Exchange believes that it is rendered
superfluous by the proposed change:

    If [neither of the conditions specified in subsections (i) or
(ii) apply, and] the order is no longer marketable, or, if an order
has been designated as an order type that is not eligible to be
routed away, the order either will be placed in the Consolidated
Book or cancelled if such order would lock or cross the NBBO.

    The Exchange believes the proposed deletion of this clause is
appropriate because the order is either going to be executed at the
next available price (Rule 964NY(c)(2)(E)(i)) or, if it locks or
crosses the NBBO, the Exchange will route it out (proposed Rule
964NY(c)(2)(E)(ii), which incorporates language from current subsection
(iii). Finally, the Exchange also proposes to delete the reference to
Tracking Orders as contained in Rule 964NY(c)(3)(C) because it is an
obsolete reference.
    The above mentioned rule changes are non-substantive and technical
in nature and simply designed to remove references to an obsolete order
type.
    Separately, the Exchange is also proposing to update an obsolete
reference in Rule 964NY(d) (Prohibited Conduct Relating to Crossing
Orders). In 2009, the Exchange filed and received approval of a rule
change that reduced the exposure time during which Amex Users may not
execute as principal against orders they represent as agent from three
seconds to one second as found in Rule 935NY.\4\ However, Rule
964NY(d)(1), which references the exposure time, was never adjusted to
reflect the change. The Exchange now proposes to remove the outdated
reference to the three-second exposure requirement found in Rule
964NY(d)(1). The Exchange also proposes to add a reference to Rule
935NY, in lieu of including the actual exposure time in Rule
964NY(d)(1). The Exchange believes changing the rule text in Rule
964NY(d)(1) to reference to Rule 935NY would ensure consistency and
transparency in Exchange rules, as any future changes to Rule 935NY
would automatically be taken into account by Rule 964NY(d)(1), and
would reduce any confusion among market participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities and Exchange Release No. 59956 (May 21,
2009), 74 FR 25782, (May 29, 2009) (NYSEAmex-2009-15).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) \5\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),
in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\6\ in
particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system. Specifically, the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change will remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and add transparency
and clarity to the Exchange's rules. The Exchange further believes that
eliminating references to an obsolete order type and updating an
outmoded reference promotes just and equitable principles of trade,
fosters cooperation and coordination among persons engaged in
facilitating securities transactions, and removes impediments to and
perfects the mechanism of a free and open market by ensuring that
members, regulators and the public can more easily navigate the
Exchange's rulebook and better understand the order types available for
trading on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change is not
designed to address any competitive issue but rather to revise obsolete
or inaccurate rule text and to remove language pertaining to
unavailable functionality in the Exchange's rulebook, thereby reducing
confusion and making the Exchange's rules easier to understand and
navigate. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will
serve to promote regulatory clarity and consistency, thereby reducing
burdens on the marketplace and facilitating investor protection.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\8\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)

of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \9\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2014-65 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2014-65. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Copies of the filing will also be
available for Web site viewing and printing at the NYSE's principal
office and on its Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2014-65 and should
be submitted on or before September 8, 2014.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-19473 Filed 8-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 156 (Monday, August 15, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49990-49991]
[FR Doc No: 2022-17460]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2022-0633]

Special Local Regulations; Marine Events Within the Fifth Coast
Guard District

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notification of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce a special local regulation for
the Atlantic City Ironman on September 10, 2022 to provide for the
safety of life on navigable waterways during this event. Our regulation
for marine events within the Fifth Coast Guard District identifies the
regulated area for this event in Atlantic City, NJ. During the
enforcement periods, the operator of any vessel in the regulated area
must comply with directions from the Patrol Commander or any Official
Patrol displaying a Coast Guard ensign.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 100.501 will be enforced for the
regulated areas listed in Table 1 to Paragraph (i)(1) of Sec.  100.501
for the Atlantic City Ironman from 6 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on September
10, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notification of enforcement, call or email Petty Officer Dylan
Caikowski, U.S. Coast Guard, Sector Delaware Bay, Waterways Management
Division, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce special local
regulations in 33 CFR 100.501, for the Atlantic City Ironman from 6:00
a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on September 10, 2022. This action is being taken to
provide for the safety of life on navigable waterways during this
event. Our regulation for marine events within the Fifth Coast Guard
District, Sec.  100.501, specifies the location of the regulated area
for the Atlantic City Ironman which encompasses portions of the New
Jersey Intracoastal Waterway. As reflected in Sec.  100.501(d)(2),
during the enforcement periods, if you are the operator of a

vessel in the regulated area you must comply with directions from the
Patrol Commander or any Official Patrol displaying a Coast Guard
ensign.
    In addition to this notification of enforcement in the Federal
Register, the Coast Guard plans to provide notification of this
enforcement period via the Local Notice to Mariners, and marine
information broadcasts.

    Dated: August 9, 2022.
Jonathan D. Theel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard. Captain of the Port, Delaware Bay.
[FR Doc. 2022-17460 Filed 8-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 98 (Monday, May 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27872-27875]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10900]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2021-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2136]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Federal
Regulations. The LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will be finalized on the dates
listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS report in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Chief executive officer  of                                        Online location of                                Community
          State and county            Location and  case No.              community                Community map  repository      letter  of map revision    Date of  modification       No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama:
    Calhoun........................  City of Oxford (20-04-   The Honorable Alton Craft,        Public Works Department, 42      https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 28, 2021...........       010023
                                      1850P).                  Mayor, City of Oxford, P.O. Box   Public Works Drive, Oxford, AL   portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               3383, Oxford, AL 36203.           36203.
    Lee............................  City of Auburn (20-04-   The Honorable Ron Anders, Jr.,    City Hall, 144 Tichenor Avenue,  https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 20, 2021...........       010144
                                      4301P).                  Mayor, City of Auburn, 144        Auburn, AL 36830.                portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               Tichenor Avenue, Suite 1,
                                                               Auburn, AL 36830.
    Lee............................  City of Opelika (20-04-  The Honorable Gary Fuller,        Public Works Department, 700     https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 20, 2021...........       010145
                                      2856P).                  Mayor, City of Opelika, P.O.      Fox Trail, Opelika, AL 36803.    portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               Box 390, Opelika, AL 36803.
    Lee............................  Unincorporated areas of  The Honorable Bill English,       Lee County Building Inspection   https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 20, 2021...........       010250
                                      Lee County (20-04-       Chairman, Lee County              Department, 100 Orr Avenue,      portal/advanceSearch.
                                      4301P).                  Commission, P.O. Box 666,         Opelika, AL 36804.
                                                               Opelika, AL 36803.
    Shelby.........................  City of Helena (21-04-   The Honorable J. Brian Puckett,   City Hall, 816 Highway 52 East,  https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 23, 2021...........       010294
                                      0379P).                  Mayor, City of Helena, 846        Helena, AL 35080.                poral/advanceSearch.
                                                               Highway 52 East, Helena, AL
                                                               35080.
    St. Clair......................  City of Margaret (20-04- The Honorable Jeffery G. Wilson,  St. Clair County Flood           https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 20, 2021...........       010393
                                      4313P).                  Mayor, City of Margaret, P.O.     Management Department, 165 5th   portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               Box 100, Margaret, AL 35953.      Avenue, Suite 100, Ashville,
                                                                                AL 35953.
    St. Clair......................  Unincorporated areas of  The Honorable Paul Manning,       St. Clair County Flood           https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 20, 2021...........       010290
                                      St. Clair County (20-    Chairman, St. Clair County        Management Department, 165 5th   portal/advanceSearch.
                                      04-4313P).               Commission, 165 5th Avenue,       Avenue, Suite 100, Ashville,
                                                               Suite 100, Ashville, AL 35953.    AL 35953.
Colorado:
    Arapahoe.......................  City of Aurora (21-08-   The Honorable Mike Coffman,       Engineering Department, 15151    https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 27, 2021...........       080002
                                      0025P).                  Mayor, City of Aurora, 15151      East Alameda Parkway, Aurora,    portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               East Alameda Parkway, Aurora,     CO 80012.
                                                               CO 80012.
    Arapahoe.......................  Unincorporated areas of  The Honorable Nancy Jackson,      Arapahoe County Public Works     https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 27, 2021...........       080011
                                      Arapahoe County (21-08-  Chair, Arapahoe County Board of   and Development Department,      portal/advanceSearch.
                                      0025P).                  Commissioners, 5334 South         6924 South Lima Street,
                                                               Prince Street, Littleton, CO      Centennial, CO 80112.
                                                               80120.
    Jefferson......................  City of Arvada (20-08-   The Honorable Marc Williams,      Engineering Division, 8101       https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 13, 2021...........       085072
                                      0711P).                  Mayor, City of Arvada, 8101       Ralston Road, Arvada, CO         portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               Ralston Road, Arvada, CO 80002.   80002.
    Weld...........................  City of Windsor (21-08-  The Honorable Paul Rennemeyer,    City Hall, 301 Walnut Street,    https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 30, 2021...........       080264
                                      0099P).                  Mayor, Town of Windsor, 301       Windsor, CO 80550.               portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               Walnut Street, Windsor, CO
                                                               80550.
    Weld...........................  Unincorporated areas of  The Honorable Steve Moreno,       Weld County Administration       https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 30, 2021...........       080266
                                      Weld County (21-08-      Chairman, Weld County Board of    Building, 1150 O Street,         portal/advanceSearch.
                                      0099P).                  Commissioners, P.O. Box 758,      Greeley, CO 80631.
                                                               Greeley, CO 80631.
Connecticut: New London............  Town of Waterford (20-   The Honorable Robert J. Brule,    Town Hall, 15 Rope Ferry Road,   https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 6, 2021............       090107
                                      01-1005P).               First Selectman, Town of          Waterford, CT 06385.             portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               Waterford, Board of Selectmen,
                                                               15 Rope Ferry Road, Waterford,
                                                               CT 06385.
Delaware:
    Sussex.........................  City of Seaford (20-03-  The Honorable David Genshaw,      City Hall, 414 High Street,      https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 18, 2021...........       100048
                                      1397P).                  Mayor, City of Seaford, P.O.      Seaford, DE 19973.               portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               Box 1100, Seaford, DE 19973.
    Sussex.........................  Unincorporated areas of  The Honorable Michael H.          Sussex County Administrative     https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 18, 2021...........       100029
                                      Sussex County (20-03-    Vincent, President, Sussex        Building, 2 The Circle,          portal/advanceSearch.
                                      1397P).                  County Council, P.O. Box 589,     Georgetown, DE 19947.
                                                               Georgetown, DE 19947.
Florida:

    Marion.........................  City of Ocala (20-04-    The Honorable Kent Guinn, Mayor,  Building Department, 110         https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 20, 2021...........       120330
                                      4466P).                  City of Ocala, 110 Southeast      Southeast Watula Avenue,         portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               Watula Avenue, Ocala, FL 34471.   Ocala, FL 34471.
    Pinellas.......................  Town of Belleair (21-04- Mr. J.P. Murphy, Manager, Town    Building Department, 901 Ponce   https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 5, 2021............       125088
                                      0918P).                  of Belleair, 901 Ponce de Leon    de Leon Boulevard, Belleair,     portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               Boulevard, Belleair, FL 33756.    FL 33756.
Georgia: Columbia..................  Unincorporated areas of  The Honorable Douglas Duncan,     Columbia County Engineering      https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 19, 2021...........       130059
                                      Columbia County (21-04-  Chairman, Columbia County Board   Services Department, 630         portal/advanceSearch.
                                      0847P).                  of Commissioners, P.O. Box 498,   Ronald Reagan Drive, Building
                                                               Evans, GA 30809.                  A, Evans, GA 30809.
Maryland: Howard...................  Unincorporated areas of  The Honorable Calvin Ball,        Howard County Stormwater         https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 20, 2021...........       240044
                                      Howard County (21-03-    Howard County Executive, 3430     Management Division, Bureau of   portal/advanceSearch.
                                      0437P).                  Court House Drive, Ellicott       Environmental Services, 9801
                                                               City, MD 21043.                   Broken Land Parkway, Columbia,
                                                                                MD 21046.
New Mexico: Bernalillo.............  Unincorporated areas of  The Honorable Charlene E.         Bernalillo County Public Works   https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 27, 2021...........       350001
                                      Bernalillo County (20-   Pyskoty, Chair, Bernalillo        Department, 2400 Broadway        portal/advanceSearch.
                                      06-2787P).               County Board of Commissioners,    Boulevard, Albuquerque, NM
                                                               1 Civic Plaza Northwest,          87102.
                                                               Albuquerque, NM 87102.
North Carolina: Orange.............  City of Mebane (21-04-   The Honorable Ed Hooks, Mayor,    Planning Department, 106 East    https://msc.fema.gov/     Jul. 15, 2021...........       370390
                                      0010P).                  City of Mebane, 106 East          Washington Street, Mebane, NC    portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               Washington Street, Mebane, NC     27302.
                                                               27302.
Pennsylvania:
    Lackawanna.....................  Borough of Dickson City  The Honorable Robert W.           Borough Hall, 901 Enterprise     https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 23, 2021...........       420528
                                      (21-03-0435P).           MacCallum, Mayor, Borough of      Street, Dickson City, PA         portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               Dickson City, 901 Enterprise      18519.
                                                               Street, Dickson City, PA 18519.
    Lackawanna.....................  Borough of Moscow (21-   The Honorable Arthur Pencek,      Borough Hall, 123 Van Brunt      https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 23, 2021...........       420534
                                      03-0435P).               President, Borough of Moscow      Street, Moscow, PA 18444.        portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               Council, 123 Van Brunt Street,
                                                               Moscow, PA 18444.
    Lackawanna.....................  Borough of Olyphant (21- The Honorable John Sedlak, Jr.,   Borough Hall, 113 Willow         https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 23, 2021...........       420536
                                      03-0435P).               Mayor, Borough of Olyphant, 113   Avenue, Olyphant, PA 18447.      portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               Willow Avenue, Olyphant, PA
                                                               18447.
    Lackawanna.....................  Township of Clifton (21- The Honorable Theodore Stout,     Township Hall, 361 State Road    https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 23, 2021...........       421751
                                      03-0435P).               Chairman, Township of Clifton     435, Clifton, PA 18424.          portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               Board of Supervisors, 361 State
                                                               Road 435, Clifton, PA 18424.
    Montgomery.....................  Township of Upper        Mr. Anthony Hamaday, Manager,     Township Hall, 175 West Valley   https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 23, 2021...........       420957
                                      Merion (20-03-1496P).    Township of Upper Merion, 175     Forge Road, King of Prussia,     portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               West Valley Forge Road, King of   PA 19406.
                                                               Prussia, PA 19406.
Texas:
    Collin.........................  City of Murphy (20-06-   The Honorable Scott Bradley,      City Hall, 206 North Murphy      https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 23, 2021...........       480137
                                      3201P).                  Mayor, City of Murphy, 206        Road, Murphy, TX 75094.          portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               North Murphy Road, Murphy, TX
                                                               75094.
    Denton and Tarrant.............  City of Fort Worth (21-  The Honorable Betsy Price,        Transportation and Public Works  https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 16, 2021...........       480596
                                      06-0261P).               Mayor, City of Fort Worth, 200    Department, Engineering Vault,   portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               Texas Street, Fort Worth, TX      200 Texas Street, Fort Worth,
                                                               76102.                            TX 76102.
    Guadalupe......................  City of Seguin (20-06-   The Honorable Donna Dodgen,       City Hall, 205 North River       https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 19, 2021...........       485508
                                      3659P).                  Mayor, City of Seguin, 205        Street, Seguin, TX 78155.        portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               North River Street, Seguin, TX
                                                               78155.

    Guadalupe......................  Unincorporated areas of  The Honorable Kyle Kutscher,      Guadalupe County Engineering     https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 19, 2021...........       480266
                                      Guadalupe County (20-    Guadalupe County Judge, 211       Department, 2605 North           portal/advanceSearch.
                                      06-3659P).               West Court Street, Seguin, TX     Guadalupe Street, Seguin, TX
                                                               78155.                            78155.
    Harris.........................  Unincorporated areas of  The Honorable Lina Hidalgo,       Harris County Permit Office,     https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 23, 2021...........       480287
                                      Harris County (20-06-    Harris County Judge, 1001         1005 Northwest Freeway, Suite    portal/advanceSearch.
                                      3120P).                  Preston Street, Suite 911,        120, Houston, TX 77092.
                                                               Houston, TX 77002.
    Rockwall.......................  City of Royse City (20-  The Honorable Clay Ellis, Mayor,  Engineering Department, 305      https://msc.fema.gov/     Aug. 13, 2021...........       480548
                                      06-3180P).               City of Royse City, 305 North     North Arch Street, Royse City,   portal/advanceSearch.
                                                               Arch Street, Royse City, TX       TX 75189.
                                                               75189.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2021-10900 Filed 5-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register: April 9, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 67)]
[Notices]
[Page 16238-16239]
[DOCID:fr09ap09-111]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Form 13F; SEC File No. 270-22; OMB Control No. 3235-0006.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the
collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to
submit this existing collection of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension and approval.
    Section 13(f) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 \2\ (the
``Exchange Act'') empowers the Commission to: (1) Adopt rules that
create a reporting and

disclosure system to collect specific information; and (2) disseminate
such information to the public. Rule 13f-1 \3\ under the Exchange Act
requires institutional investment managers that exercise investment
discretion over accounts--having in the aggregate a fair market value
of at least $100,000,000 of exchange-traded or NASDAQ-quoted equity
securities--to file quarterly reports with the Commission on Form
13F.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78m(f).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.13f-1.
    \4\ 17 CFR 249.325.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The information collection requirements apply to institutional
investment managers that meet the $100 million reporting threshold.
Section 13(f)(5) of the Exchange Act defines an ``institutional
investment manager'' as any person, other than a natural person,
investing in or buying and selling securities for its own account, and
any person exercising investment discretion with respect to the account
of any other person. Form 13F under the Exchange Act defines
``investment discretion'' for purposes of Form 13F reporting.
    The reporting system required by Section 13(f) of the Exchange Act
is intended, among other things, to create in the Commission a central
repository of historical and current data about the investment
activities of institutional investment managers, and to improve the
body of factual data available to regulators and the public.
    The Commission staff estimates that 4,052 respondents make
approximately 16,208 responses under the rule each year. The staff
estimates that on average, Form 13F filers spend 98.8 hours/year to
prepare and submit the report. In addition, the staff estimates that
210 respondents file approximately 840 amendments each year. The staff
estimates that on average, Form 13F filers spend 4 hours/year to
prepare and submit amendments to Form 13F. The total annual burden of
the rule's requirements for all respondents therefore is estimated to
be 401,178 hours ((4,052 filers x 98.8 hours) + (210 filers x 4
hours)).
    The estimate of average burden hours is made solely for the
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act. The estimate is not derived
from a comprehensive or even a representative survey or study of the
costs of Commission rules. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid control number.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the Commission, including whether the information has practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burdens
of the collections of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burdens of the collections of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Charles Boucher, Director/
CIO, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley Martinson, 6432
General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an e-mail to: PRA_
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: April 3, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-8067 Filed 4-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P