MEMORANDUM

DATE:                  12/1/14

FROM:                 Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4

TO:                       Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR - 2013-0602

SUBJECT:            Discussion of the Clean Power Plan with Small Business Majority Roundtable  -  North Carolina

SUMMARY:         REGION 4 PROVIDED INFORMATION ON THE CLEAN POWER PLAN TO A GROUP OF SMAll businessmen at a roundtable hosted by Small Business Majority in Durham, NC, on June 4, 2014. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.   ATTENDEES:

EPA Heather McTeer Toney/EPA R4  Allison Wise/EPA R4

External Stakeholders Approximately 10 Durham Chamber of Commerce Members


1 Date: August 25, 2003 Subject: Meeting Summary  EPA and representatives from Northshore Mining From: Chris Sarsony, Alpha Gamma Technologies, Inc To: Docket OAR 2002   0039 I. Purpose The primary purpose of the meeting was to discuss the parametric monitoring of wet ESP at Northshore.

II. Date June 9, 2003 III. Attendees U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Conrad Chin, OAQPS/ ESD/ MG Northshore Representatives Dave Skolasinski, Northshore Mining Alpha Gamma Technologies Chris Sarsony IV. Discussion A. Parametric Monitoring for Wet ESP ° Northshore monitors the inlet and outlet temperature for their ESP, but they do not know how much of an effect temperature has on HAP emissions. Waterflow seems to have the greatest impact on emissions for their wet ESP. Voltage and current does not seem to have a significant impact on emissions. Their wet ESPs are operating more like wet scrubbers than ESPs. They do have the capability of monitoring the current and voltage of each ESP if required. ° Northshore's wet ESPs contain concentric cylinders that get scale buildup over OAR 2002 0039 IV E 17 2 time. According to Northshore's representative the amount of scale buildup appears to have no effect on emissions ( no data was provided to support this).

° Northshore requested that the rule contain the flexibility to submit a monitoring plan for alternative monitoring parameters. The EPA explained that the proposed rule allowed that flexibility.

B. Ore Crushing and Handling  Northshore does not know whether the emission units controlled by older multiclones will be able to meet the emission limit in the rule. Only one or two of these units have been tested. All of the emission units controlled by baghouses have emissions around 0.002 gr/ dscf. Therefore, units controlled by baghouses will meet the proposed emission limit.

C. Finished Pellet Handling  Even with averaging the emission units controlled by rotoclones will not be able to meet the proposed emission limit.


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30036-30039]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13760]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2018-0443]
RIN 1625-AA09

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Technical Amendment; Removal of
Obsolete Drawbridge Operating Regulations

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is removing the existing operation regulations
for 33 drawbridges across various waterways and in various locations,
across the east coast and western rivers of the United States. These
drawbridges have either been replaced with a fixed bridge, removed from
the waterway, altered with CG approval in such a manner that the
drawspan is no longer moveable or the approaching rail lines or
roadways have been removed with the drawspan open to navigation and
inoperable. These 33 operating regulations are no longer applicable or
necessary.

DATES: This rule is effective June 27, 2018.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2018-0443. In the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Chris Jaufmann, Office of Bridge Programs; United
States Coast Guard Headquarters; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department Of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this final rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that notice
and comment procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) due to the fact that the 33 drawbridges identified
either do not exist or no longer function as a drawbridge. Therefore,
their regulations are no longer applicable and need to be removed. It
is unnecessary to publish a NPRM because drawbridge regulations are
only used for bridges that have an operational span that is intended to
be opened for the passage of waterway traffic. These bridges are no
longer operational.
    For the same reasons stated in the preceding paragraph, under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective in less than 30 days after publication in
the Federal Register. The bridges at issue no longer have an
operational span and therefore have no need of a drawbridge regulation.
The removal of the regulation will not affect mariners currently
operating on this waterway. Therefore, a delayed effective date is
unnecessary.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
    The elimination of these drawbridges necessitates the removal of
their corresponding drawbridge operation regulation in 33 CFR part 117
subpart B.

IV. Discussion of Final Rule

    The Coast Guard is removing restrictions and the regulatory burdens
related to the draw operations for these 33 bridges that no longer
function as drawbridges. In the regulatory section of this final rule,
the 33 bridges are presented numerically based on their section number
and, if applicable, paragraph lettering under 33 CFR part 117 subpart
B.
    This final rule will update 33 CFR part 117 subpart B by removing
language that governs the operating schedule of the aforementioned
bridges, which in fact, in their current state, are no longer
drawbridges. The removal of

these obsolete regulations will not affect waterway or land traffic.
    The following bridges remain across their respective waterways and
remain in use in their transportation function, however; have been
converted to fixed bridges:

--Sec.  117.125(b) Black River; Black Rock, AR; Burlington Northern RR
Bridge; Mile 68.4; Eighth Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.125(c) Black River; Pocahontas, AR; Arkansas State HWY
Dept. Bridge; Mile 90.1; Eighth Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.125(e) Black River; Corning, AR; Union Pacific RR Bridge;
Mile 144.4; Eighth Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.125(f) Black River; Corning, AR; Arkansas State HWY Dept.
Bridge; Mile 152.2; Eighth Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.127 Current River; Biggers, AR; Arkansas Highway Bridge;
Mile 10.2; Eight Coast Guard District
--Sec.  117.527 Kennebunk River; Between Kennebunk and Kennebunkport,
ME; Dock Square Drawbridge; Mile 1; First Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.591(b) Charles River and its Tributaries; Boston, MA;
Charleston Bridge; Mile 0.4; First Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.609(b) Mystic River; Somerville, MA; Wellington Bridge;
Mile 2.5; First Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.613 North River; Norwell, MA; Plymouth County (Bridge
Street) Bridge; Mile 4.0; First Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.738 Overpeck Creek; Ridgefield Park; Conrail and the New
York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad Bridges; Mile 0.0; First Coast
Guard District.

    The following bridges are no longer functional drawbridges. These
bridges have either had their operable drawspan removed or the bridge
was removed in whole from the waterway:

--Sec.  117.125(d) Black River; Pocahontas, AR; Burlington Northern RR
Bridge; Mile 90.4; Eighth Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.127 Current River; Biggers, AR; Burlington Northern RR
Bridge; Mile 12.2; Eighth Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.272 Boot Key Harbor; Between Marathon and Boot Key, FL;
Boot Key Harbor Drawbridge; Mile 0.13; Seventh Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.531(c)(2) Piscataqua River; Portsmouth, ME; Sarah M. Long
(Route 1 Bypass) Secondary Recreation Draw; Mile 2.5; First Coast Guard
District.
--Sec.  117.599 Fort Point Channel; Boston, MA; Northern Avenue Bridge;
Mile 0.1; First Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.601 Malden River; Between Medford and Everett, MA; S16
Bridge; Mile 0.3; First Coast Guard District.

    The following bridges remain in the waterway and are open to
navigation. However, the rail line, including the bridge, are no longer
in use.

--Sec.  117.139(a) White River; DeValls Bluff; AR; Chicago, Rock Island
and Pacific Railroad Bridge; Mile 122; Eighth Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.521 Back Cove; Portland, ME; Canadian National Railroad
Bridge; Mile 0.2; First Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.605(b) Merrimack River; Newburyport, MA; Massachusetts Bay
Transportation Authority (MBTA) Railroad Bridge; Mile 3.4; First Coast
Guard District.

    The following drawbridges have been removed from the waterway and
replaced with fixed bridges:

--Sec.  117.139(a) White River; DeValls Bluff, AR; US70 Highway Bridge;
Mile 121.7; First Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.261(b) Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from St. Mary's River
to Key Largo; Jacksonville Beach, FL; McCormick Bridge; Mile 747.5;
Seventh Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.261(qq) Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from St. Mary's
River to Key Largo; Key Largo, FL; Jewfish Creek; Mile 1134; Seventh
Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.287(i) Gulf Intracoastal Waterway; Clearwater, FL; Belleair
Beach Drawbridge; Mile 131.8; Seventh Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.309 Nassau Sound; Between Amelia Island and Talbot Island,
FL; Fernandina Port Authority (SR-A-1-A) Bridge; Mile 0.4; Seventh
Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.317(j) Okeechobee Waterway; Punta Rassa, FL; Sanibel
Causeway Bridge; Mile 151; Seventh Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.483 Ouachita River; Harrisonburg, LA; S8 Bridge; Mile 57.5;
Eight Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.529 Narraguagus River; Millbridge, ME; Highway Bridge; Mile
1.8; First Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.739(n)(1) Passaic River; Wallington, NJ; Gregory Avenue
Bridge; Mile 14; First Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.779 Eastchester Bay (Arm of); Between Rodman Neck and City
Island, NY; Highway Bridge; Mile 2.2; First Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.805 Peekskill (Annsville) Creek; Peekskill, NY; Conrail
Bridge; Mile 0; First Coast Guard District.
--Sec.  117.1059(d) Snohomish River, Steamboat Slough, and Ebey Bay;
Everett, WA; SR 2 Highway Bridges; Mile 6.9; Thirteenth Coast Guard
District.
--Sec.  117.1059(h) Snohomish River, Steamboat Slough, and Ebey Bay;
Marysville, WA; SR 529 Highway Bridge; Mile 1.6; Thirteenth Coast Guard
District.

In accordance with Sec.  117.1059(h), the drawtender at the SR 529
Highway Bridge across Ebey Slough, mile 1.6 at Marysville would control
the openings at that bridge and the openings for the SR 529 Highway
Bridge across the Snohomish River, mile 3.6 at Everett and the twin, SR
529 Highway Bridges across Steamboat Slough, mile 1.1 and 1.2
respectively near Marysville; Monday through Friday. The drawtender at
SR 529 Highway Bridge across the Snohomish River, mile 3.6 at Everett
would control bridge openings at all other times. Due to the
replacement of the SR 529 Highway Bridge across Ebey Slough, mile 1.6
at Marysville with a fixed bridge, the duties of the drawtender were no
longer needed and are now the full responsibility of the drawtender at
the SR 529 Highway Bridge across the Snohomish River, mile 3.6 at
Everett. Operation and contact information for the bridges remains the
same and this action will not affect waterway and land traffic.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum
``Guidance Implementing Executive Order 13771, Titled `Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs''' (April 5, 2017). DHS
considers this final rule to be a deregulatory action.
    As previously explained the above 33 listed bridges, have either
been removed

from the waterway or converted/replaced to or by a fixed bridge. The
removal of their operating schedules from 33 CFR 117 Subpart B will
have no effect on the movement of waterway or land traffic, but will
serve to remove an outdated and obsolete provision from the CFR.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    For the reasons stated in section IV.A above this final rule would
not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
determination that this action is one of a category of actions which do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule simply promulgates the operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges. This action is categorically excluded from
further review, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction.
    A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration and a
Memorandum for the Record are not required for this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Revise Sec.  117.125 to read as follows:

Sec.  117.125   Black River.

    The Union Pacific Railroad Bridge, mile 3.4 at Paoquet need not
open for the passage of vessels.

Sec.  117.127   [Removed]

0
3. Remove Sec.  117.127.

0
4. Revise paragraph (a) in Sec.  117.139 to read as follows:

Sec.  117.139  White River.

    (a) The draws of the St. Louis Southwestern railroad bridge, mile
98.9 at Clarendon, the Missouri Pacific railroad bridge, mile 196.3 at
Augusta and the Missouri Pacific railroad bridge, mile 254.8 at
Newport, shall open on signal if at least eight hours notice is given.
The draws of any of these bridges need not be opened for a vessel that
arrives later than two hours after the time specified in the notice,
unless a second notice of at least eight hours is given.
* * * * *

Sec.  117.261   [Amended]

0
5. Amend Sec.  117.261 by removing and reserving paragraphs (b) and
(qq).

Sec.  117.272  [Removed]

0
6. Remove Sec.  117.272.

Sec.  117.287  [Amended]

0
7. Amend Sec.  117.287 by removing paragraph (i).

Sec.  117.309   [Removed]

0
8. Remove Sec.  117.309.

Sec.  117.317  [Amended]

0
9. Amend Sec.  117.317 by removing paragraph (j) and redesignating
paragraph (k) as paragraph (j).

Sec.  117.483  [Removed]

0
10. Remove Sec.  117.483.

Sec.  117.521   [Removed]

0
11. Remove Sec.  117.521.

Sec.  117.527   [Removed]

0
12. Remove Sec.  117.527.

Sec.  117.529   [Removed]

0
13. Remove Sec.  117.529.

Sec.  117.531   [Amended]

0
14. Amend Sec.  117.531 by removing and reserving paragraph (c)(2).

Sec.  117.591   [Amended]

0
15. Amend Sec.  117.591 by removing paragraph (b) and redesignating
paragraphs (c) through (f) as paragraphs (b) through (e).

Sec.  117.599   [Removed]

0
16. Remove Sec.  117.599.

Sec.  117.601  [Removed]

0
17. Remove Sec.  117.601.

Sec.  117.605   [Amended]

0
18. Amend Sec.  117.605 by removing paragraph (b) and redesignating
paragraph (c) as paragraph (b).

0
19. Revise Sec.  117.609 to read as follows:

Sec.  117.609  Mystic River.

    The draw of the S99 Alford Street Bridge, mile 1.4, shall open on
signal; except that, Monday through Saturday, excluding holidays, the
draw need not open for the passage of vessel traffic from 7:45 a.m. to
9 a.m., 9:10 a.m. to 10 a.m., and 5 p.m. to 6 p.m., daily. From
November 1 through March 31, between 3 p.m. and 7 a.m., at least an
eight-hour advance notice is required for bridge openings by calling
the number posted at the bridge.

Sec.  117.613   [Removed]

0
20. Remove Sec.  117.613.

Sec.  117.738   [Removed]

0
21. Remove Sec.  117.738.

0
22. Revise paragraph (n) in Sec.  117.739 to read as follows:

Sec.  117.739  Passaic River.

* * * * *
    (n) West Eighth Street Bridge, mile 15.3, at Garfield need not open
for the passage of vessels.
* * * * *

Sec.  117.779   [Removed]

0
23. Remove Sec.  117.779.

Sec.  117.805   [Removed]

0
24. Remove Sec.  117.805.

0
25. In Sec.  117.1059:
0
a. Revise paragraph (c).
0
b. Remove paragraphs (d) and (h).
0
c. Redesignate paragraphs (e), (f) and (g) as (d), (e) and (f).
0
d. Revise newly redesignated paragraph (f).
    The revisions read as follows:

Sec.  117.1059  Snohomish River, Steamboat Slough, and Ebey Slough.

* * * * *
    (c) The draws of the twin, SR 529, highway bridges across the
Snohomish River, mile 3.6, at Everett shall open on signal if notice is
provided at least one hour in advance. Notice for openings shall be
given by marine radio, telephone or other means to the drawtender at
the twin, SR 529, Highway Bridges across the Snohomish River, mile 3.6.
One signal opens both draws. During freshets, a drawtender shall be in
constant attendance, and the draws shall open on signal when so ordered
by the District Commander.
* * * * *
    (f) The draws of the twin SR 529, highway bridges across Steamboat
Slough, miles 1.1 and 1.2, near Marysville, shall open on signal if
notice is provided at least four hours in advance. Notice for openings
shall be given by marine radio or telephone to the drawtender at the
twin, SR 529, Highway Bridges across the Snohomish River, mile 3.6. One
signal opens both draws. During freshets, a drawtender shall be in
constant attendance, and the draws shall open on signal when so ordered
by the District Commander.

Brian L. Dunn,
Chief, Bridge Program, Coast Guard Headquarters.
[FR Doc. 2018-13760 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


1 PART A OF THE SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR STANDARD FORM 83 I Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production 1. Identification of the Information Collection ( a) Title of the Information Collection " National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:

Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production"

( b) Short Characterization Respondents are owners or operators of any existing,

reconstructed, or new vegetable oil production process, which is defined as a group of continuous process equipment used to remove an oil from oilseeds through direct contact with an organic solvent such as n hexane. The term " oilseeds" refers to the following agricultural products: corn germ, cottonseed, flax,

peanut, rapeseed ( for example, canola), safflower, soybean, and sunflower. A vegetable oil production process is only subject to the regulation if it is a major source of HAP emissions, or is collocated with other sources that are individually or collectively a major source of HAP emissions. " Major source"

means that the process equipment used to produce the vegetable oil and any other operations or equipment at a facility emit or have the potential to emit 10 tons per year or more of a single HAP or 25 tons per year or more of any combination of HAP.

The solvent extraction for vegetable oil production NESHAP requires each source to develop a plan for demonstrating compliance. The source must follow this plan each month to measure and record extraction solvent, HAP content of the extraction solvent, and oilseed inventories. Sources will also develop a startup, shutdown, and malfunction ( SSM) plan to be followed during each SSM event. As required by the NESHAP General Provisions ( 40 CFR 63, subpart A), each source must submit initial or startup notifications. Sources must submit a compliance status notification 12 operating months after the compliance date and an annual compliance certification every 2 subsequent 12 calendar months. An operating month is defined as any calendar month in which a source processes any quantity of listed oilseed, excluding any entire calendar month in which the source operated under an initial startup period or a malfunction period. Sources must submit SSM reports following SSM events occurring during each qualifying malfunction period.

All reports are submitted to the responsible agency. If the Administrator has delegated authority to your state, then the state is the responsible agency to enforce this regulation. If the Administrator has not delegated authority to your state, then the EPA Regional Office is the responsible agency to enforce this regulation.

This information collection involves 111 respondents, which includes 106 existing sources and 5 new sources over the 3 year period. The total respondent cost is estimated to be $ 1.3 million. The Agency cost is estimated to be $ 72 thousand.

2. Need For and Use of the Collection ( a) Need/ Authority for the Collection The Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) is charged under section 112 of the Clean Air Act ( CAA), as amended, to establish:

. . . emission standards for each category or subcategory of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants listed for regulation...

The list of source categories published in the Federal Register on July 16, 1992 ( 57 FR 31576) includes vegetable oil production as a major source category. In addition, section 114( a)( 1) of the CAA states that:

. . . the Administrator may require any person who owns or operates any emission source or who is subject to any requirement of this Act . . . to ( A) establish and maintain such records, ( B) make such reports, 3 ( c) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment or methods, ( D) sample such emissions ( in accordance with such methods, at such locations, at such intervals, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe), and ( E) provide such other information, as he may reasonably require.

Certain reports are necessary to enable the Administrator to identify vegetable oil production processes subject to the NESHAP and to determine if the standards are being achieved.

( b) Use/ Users of the Data The information will be used by Agency enforcement personnel to: ( 1) identify sources subject to the standards and ( 2) ensure that the emission standard is being met.

In addition, records and reports are necessary to enable the EPA to identify vegetable oil production processes that may not be in compliance with the standards. Based on reported information, the EPA can decide which vegetable oil production processes and what records should be inspected. The records that vegetable oil production processes maintain would indicate to the EPA whether the personnel are operating and maintaining the equipment properly.

3. Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria ( a) Nonduplication Duplication in the reporting of vegetable oil production process emission data is not anticipated. The solvent extraction for vegetable oil production NESHAP is the only federal emission standard to be applied to vegetable oil production processes at this time.

( b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB This section does not apply since public notice was given as part of the proposal process for the solvent extraction for vegetable oil production NESHAP.

( c) Consultations 4 The EPA advised interested parties in 1992 ( 57 FR 21592) of the categories considered as major sources of HAP. Several meetings were also held with affected sources during development of the standards to solicit comments on the requirements. Public comments on the solvent extraction for vegetable oil production NESHAP were solicited by the proposal notice. The EPA received a total of eight letters commenting on the proposed standard. The comments were summarized and addressed in the EPA document " Public Comments and EPA Responses to the Proposed NESHAP for Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production." Changes made to the rule as a result of addressing these comments did not affect the estimate of burden for the standard.

( d) Effects of Less Frequent Data Collection The solvent extraction for vegetable oil production NESHAP requires the reports described in 1( b) of this supporting statement. If the relevant information were collected less frequently, the EPA would not be reasonably assured that a facility is in compliance with the standard.

( e) General Guidelines This rule requires that facility owners and operators retain inventory and compliance records at the vegetable oil production facility for a minimum period of 5 years, thus exceeding general guidelines for records to be kept for 3 years.

The longer time period is necessary for the NESHAP to be consistent with the 5 year recordkeeping requirement in the operating permit program under Title V of the CAA. Since each vegetable oil production process using solvent extraction is required to obtain an operating permit, the 5 year recordkeeping requirement of the NESHAP does not increase the recordkeeping burden.

This collection does not violate any of the other general guidelines for information collections.

( f) Confidentiality Most data submitted will not be confidential. If any 5 information is submitted to the EPA for which a claim of confidentiality is made, the information would be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in title 40,

chapter 1, part 2, subpart B.

( g) Sensitive Questions This section is not applicable because this ICR does not involve matters of a sensitive nature.

4. The Respondents and the Information Requested ( a) Respondents/ NAICS ( SIC codes)

Respondents are owners or operators of any existing,

reconstructed, or new vegetable oil production process using solvent extraction. The North American Industrial Classification System ( NAICS) codes for the vegetable oil production processes affected by the NESHAP include 31121 Wet Corn Milling, 311222

Soybean Processing, and 311223 Other Oilseed Processing. Under the old Standard Industrial Classification ( SIC) reference system, vegetable oil production processes affected by the NESHAP are classified as codes 2046 Wet Corn Milling, 2074 Cottonseed Oil Mills, 2075 Soybean Oil Mills and 2076 Vegetable Oil Mills not elsewhere classified.

( b) Information Requested ( i) Data items. Attachment 1, entitled Source Data and Information Requirements, summarizes the section of the regulation that contain the requirements.

( ii) Respondent Activities. The activities that will allow the respondent to meet the reporting and recordkeeping requirements of the solvent extraction for vegetable oil production NESHAP are provided under the first column of Tables 1, 2, and 3.

5. The Information Collected   Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management ( a) Agency Activities A list of Agency activities is provided in Tables 4, 5, 6 and 6.

( b) Collection Methodology and Management Respondents for existing vegetable oil production processes using solvent extraction will submit an initial notification to EPA. Respondents for new sources or sources that have been reconstructed or significantly modified must submit a series of notifications associated with construction and startup of the process. The Agency will review the notifications and, if appropriate, issue a permit. All respondents must develop a plan for demonstrating compliance and a SSM plan by the compliance date to be kept on site, and available for inspection.

After the first 12 operating months, a source must submit a compliance status notification. The source then submits an annual compliance certification every subsequent 12 calendar months. The source must also submit a report for each SSM event during each qualifying malfunction period. If the SSM plan was followed, the source submits a periodic SSM report. If the SSM plan was not followed, the source submits an immediate SSM report.

Respondents will most likely submit hard copy reports,

although some may submit electronic versions. The rule allows records to be retained in hard copy or electronic format to allow flexibility and minimize burden. The EPA will review the submitted information to determine whether a source is in compliance with the rule. Files of the hard copy reports will be kept by Regional Offices. The EPA will use location and design information submitted in the reports to update the Aerometric Information Retrieval System ( AIRS) facility subsystem operated by the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Data in AIRS can be publicly accessed via the Internet from Envirofacts at http:// www. epa. gov/ enviro/ index_ java. html or through a Freedom of Information Act request to EPA. As part of EPA's ongoing enforcement program, compliance inspections will be conducted to verify compliance. Data obtained during such inspections will be tabulated and published for EPA internal use in enforcement 7 programs.

( c) Small Entity Flexibility For this NESHAP, the EPA defines a small entity as a vegetable oil production process using solvent extraction that does not meet the major source definition. These sources are exempt from the rule.

( d) Collection Schedule Schedules for the initial and periodic reports are described in section 6( a).

6. Estimating The Burden and Cost of the Collection ( a) Estimating Respondent Burden Tables 1, 2, and 3 present an itemized breakdown of the reporting and recordkeeping requirements with the annual cost and labor requirements for respondents subject to this NESHAP. The tables include the estimated burden for only a three year period following the NESHAP promulgation. Table 1 presents the annual cost and labor respondent burden estimates for the first year after promulgation. Tables 2 and 3 present the burden estimates for years 2 and 3, respectively. The cost and burden estimates were derived from EPA's experience with other standards and from discussions with industry representatives. There are approximately 106 sources currently operating that will have to comply with the NESHAP. These sources will submit an initial notification report, develop a SSM plan, and a plan for demonstrating compliance within the first three years after promulgation. It is estimated that one vegetable oil production process using solvent extraction will be constructed or reconstructed each year following proposal of the solvent 8 Table 1. 9 Table 2. 10 Table 3. 11 extraction for vegetable oil production NESHAP. These new processes must submit an application for construction,

notification of construction commencement, notification of anticipated startup date and notification of actual startup date.

By the startup date, the new sources must develop a plan for demonstrating compliance and a SSM plan. New sources may elect to operate for up to 6 months under an initial startup compliance option. Sources must submit a compliance status notification 60 days following the first 12 operating months after termination of any initial startup period. Every 12 calendar months after the submittal of the compliance status notification, sources must submit an annual compliance certification. By the end of a calendar month following a SSM event, sources must submit a periodic SSM report.

The reporting and recordkeeping requirements differ in each of the first 3 years after promulgation of the NESHAP. During the first year, initial notifications will be required from all 106 existing vegetable oil production processes using solvent extraction. During the second year, only four of the new or reconstructed sources will submit any notifications, reports or plans. During the third year, all existing ( 106) sources must develop plans for demonstrating compliance and SSM plans.

The majority of burden items are one time only requirements.

The only recurring burden items are the annual compliance certification and periodic SSM reports which require recordkeeping and monthly compliance determinations. The time required to enter records of solvent and oilseed inventory is nominal and in most cases is already being performed for other purposes such as business accounting. Therefore, the recordkeeping could be performed by existing personnel.

( b) Estimating Respondent Costs The total cost for each respondent activity, which include labor costs, capital/ startup costs, and operating and maintenance ( O& M) costs, are presented in Tables 1, 2, and 3. 12 ( i) Estimating Labor Costs. Labor costs, on a per hour basis, were estimated using the most recent, currently available labor rates ( March 1999) posted on the Internet under the Private Industry Employment Cost Trends reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics at http:// stats. bls. gov/. The total compensation index which includes wages, salaries and benefits for the private and civilian sector for technical workers is $ 45, managerial is $ 67 and clerical is $ 28.

( ii) Estimating Capital and Operations and Maintenance Costs. The solvent extraction for vegetable oil production NESHAP does not require any special monitoring or recordkeeping equipment. Therefore, no capital and operations and maintenance costs are associated with recordkeeping or reporting for the solvent extraction for vegetable oil production NESHAP.

( c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost The Agency burden and cost estimates include only those items where government would incur additional costs as a result of the information collection. These costs include user costs associated with the review and analysis of the reported information. These are presented in Tables 4, 5, and 6. Labor rates and associated costs are assumed to be the same as those used for the respondent burden estimate: $ 45/ technical hour,

$ 67/ management hour, and $ 28/ clerical hour.

Items of cost that have or would already be incurred because of other ongoing programs were not included. It will take the Agency no time to collect the information from respondents because the NESHAP requires respondents to submit the required reports. The EPA will publish the NESHAP in the Federal Register, make it available on the EPA Technology Transfer Network ( TTN) via the Internet at http:// www. epa. gov/ ttn/, and notify states, trade associations, etc. as part of EPA's normal rule communication procedures, so there will be no additional costs for notifying respondents of information collection 13 Table 4. 14 Table 5. 15 Table 6 16 requirements. There will be no costs for database development or distribution of collected information because the information will be used to update the existing AIRS facility subsystem database. There will be no additional costs for examining records that are maintained by the respondent ( rather than submitted). This examination would occur incidentally as part of the periodic inspection of sources that is part of EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program and, therefore, would not be incurred as a result of NESHAP requirements.

( d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden Costs The burden is estimated for 106 existing and 5 new sources. The number of existing respondents for this ICR is based on the document " Economic Impact Analysis for the Final Vegetable Oil Processing NESHAP" prepared for EPA in March 2000 ( EPA 452/ P 00 01). The estimate of 5 new sources is based on the assumption that one new or reconstructed vegetable oil production process using solvent extraction will startup each year.

Therefore, one new facility is assumed to have started up during the year between proposal and promulgation, one new facility will start up each of the three years after promulgation, and one will submit notifications for startup during the third year in order to start up the following year.

The 106 existing sources would report the initial notification, and develop a SSM plan, and a plan for demonstrating compliance. All 5 new vegetable oil production processes must submit a new source notification or application for construction approval and notification of construction commencement. Four of the new sources would also submit a notification of anticipated startup, a notification of actual startup, a SSM plan, and a plan for demonstrating compliance.

Only the first 3 new sources will submit a compliance status notification, an annual compliance certification, and SSM report during the first three years after promulgation of the NESHAP.

The total three year cost for all the respondents is over 17 $ 1.3 million. Dividing the three year total by three yields an annual average burden of $ 450 thousand. This total is presented in Table 7.

( i) Respondent Tally. A breakdown for each of the respondent collection, reporting, and recordkeeping activities required by the NESHAP is presented in Tables 1, 2, and 3. The estimate of total annual hours and the annualized cost requested from the respondents provided in 13( c) and 14( c) of OMB form 83 I is based on the assumptions outlined in section 6( d) of this supporting statement. The EPA estimates the respondent burden by totaling the hours per year for technical, managerial, and clerical staff, for the first 3 years after promulgation and then dividing that total by three. The results are summarized in Table 7. The EPA estimates that in each of the three years after promulgation the industry would expend 10,092 hours ( 8,775 technical, 439 managerial, and 878 clerical) at a cost of $ 450 thousand to meet the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements.

( ii) The Agency Tally. Tables 4, 5, and 6 provide a breakdown for each of the Agency activities required for the NESHAP. The activities and, therefore, the labor costs vary each year. The bottom line Agency burden hours and costs, presented in Table 8, are calculated by totaling the hours per year for technical, managerial, and clerical staff ( as specified for respondents), totaling the cost column and dividing each by three. The estimated average annual burden, over the first 3 years, for the Agency would be 537 hours ( 467 technical,

23 managerial, and 47 clerical) annually at a cost of $ 24 thousand per year.

( iii) Variations in the Annual Bottom Line. The respondent costs for year 3 are greater than years 1 and 2 because the 106 existing vegetable oil production processes using solvent extraction are required to develop a plan for demonstrating 18 Table 7 & 8 19 compliance and a SSM plan. During the first year, existing sources read the directions and submit an initial notification.

During the second year, only 4 new or modified sources are required to submit or develop reports, plans or notifications.

An itemized list of variations for years 1 through 3 are provided in Tables 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A summary of the respondent burden and labor estimate including the year totals and annual averages is provided in Table 7. The Agency burden does not vary as widely each year for the first three years after promulgation.

Tables 4, 5, and 6 itemize the variation in burden each year. A summary of the annual burden and the three year averages are provided in Table 8. The costs in year 1 are the highest because the 106 existing sources will submit initial notifications. The costs in years 2 and 3 are much less because only the 5 new or reconstructed sources submit reports that require agency review.

Table 8 lists 111 respondents for year 3 because 111 sources are required to develop reports in year 3. Review of the plan for demonstrating compliance and SSM plan is optional and unlikely for the Government to review until the compliance status notification indicates a problem.

( f) Reasons for Change In Burden This is the first submittal of this burden estimate;

therefore, this section is not applicable.

( g) Burden Statement Burden means total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,

install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information;

search data sources; complete and review the collection of 20 information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. 21 PART B OF THE SUPPORTING STATEMENT This section is not applicable because statistical methods are not used in data collection associated with this regulation. 22 ATTACHMENT 1 SOURCE DATA AND INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS Requirement Regulation Reference Recordkeeping Solvent, HAP Content and Oilseed Inventory 63.2862( c)

12 month Compliance Ratio 63.2862( d)

SSM Plan 63.2862( b)

Plan for Demonstrating Compliance 63.2862( b)

Reporting Existing Sources Initial Notification 63.2860( a)

New Sources New Source Notification/ Application for Construction 63.2860( b)

Notification of Construction Commencement 63.2860( b)

Notification of Anticipated Startup 63.2860( b)

Notification of Actual Startup 63.2860( b)

All Sources Notification of Compliance Status 63.2860( d)

Annual Compliance Certification 63.2861( a)

Deviation Notification Report 63.2861( b)

Periodic SSM Report 63.2861( c)

Immediate SSM Report 63.2861( d)


[Federal Register: January 18, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 13)]
[Notices]
[Page 3508]
[DOCID:fr18ja08-102]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Approval of Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) on
a Short Form Environmental Assessment (EA); Abraham Lincoln Capital
Airport; Springfield, IL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION:  Notice of Approval of Documents.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is issuing this
notice to advise the public of the approval of a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) on an Environmental Assessment for proposed
Federal actions at Abraham Lincoln Capital Airport, Springfield,
Illinois. The FONSI specifies that the proposed federal actions and
local development projects are consistent with existing environmental
policies and objectives as set forth in the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 and will not significantly affect the quality of the
environment.
    A description of the proposed Federal actions is: (a) To issue an
environmental finding to allow approval of the Airport Layout Plan
(ALP) for the development items listed below.
    The items in the local airport development project are to: Acquire
approximately 40 acres of residential land in fee simple title,
including relocation assistance; demolish residential structures on
acquired property; construct, light, and mark 1,000-foot northwesterly
extension to Taxiway Bravo and connecting taxiway, including grading
and drainage; clear and grub taxiway construction area; obtain borrow
for Taxiway Bravo extension; implement declared distance concepts for
Runway 13/31 to increase the usable length from 7,000 feet to a maximum
usable length of 7,400 feet, including remarking; remove obstructions
in Runway 13 approach; install/replace runway signage for Runway 13
Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI); relocate Runway 13 windcone;
replace existing Medium Intensity Runway Lights (HIRLs) with High
Intensity Runway Lights (HIRLs) on Runway 13/31; relocate Runway 31
windcone out of the Runway Safety Area; adjust vertically the Runway 31
Medium Intensity Approach Lighting System with Runway Alignment
Indicator Lights (MALSR) threshold bar; install new Runway 13/31
homeruns; construct 200-foot by 200-foot blast pad to Runway 31;
replace Runway 13/31 surface sensor system; upgrade airfield vault
regulators; upgrade Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) airfield
lighting control system; and replace airport rotating beacon.
    Copies of the environmental decision and the Short Form EA are
available for public information review during regular business hours
at the following locations:
    1. Abraham Lincoln Capital Airport, 1200 Capital Airport Drive,
Springfield, IL 62707.
    2. Division of Aeronautics-Illinois Department of Transportation,
One Langhorne Bond Drive, Capital Airport, Springfield, IL 62707.
    3. Federal Aviation Administration, Chicago Airports District
Office, 2300 East Devon Avenue, Room 320, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy B. Hanson, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Chicago
Airports District Office, Room 320, 2300 East Devon Avenue, Des
Plaines, Illinois 60018. Ms. Hanson can be contacted at<PHONE_NUMBER>
(voice),<PHONE_NUMBER> (facsimile) or by E-Mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois on December 21, 2007.
James G. Keefer,
Manager, Chicago Airports District Office, FAA, Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. 08-166 Filed 1-17-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


From:
May, Jeffrey X<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Friday, May 13, 2016 2:54 PM
To:
Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc:
Zavoda, Rich<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Hill, John R<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Maciel, Robert A<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Kiechle, Fredric S<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
Testing Related Deviations ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor for Coke MACT ICR Letter Dated April 4th, 2016

Find Attached the current ICR related testing issues for ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC, in accordance with the Coke MACT ICR requirements.
Jeffrey May | Sr. Engineer-Environmental
ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor
Maintenance, Environmental, and Utilities | 250 W US Hwy. 12
Burns Harbor, Indiana 46304
T +1<PHONE_NUMBER> | F +1<PHONE_NUMBER> | M +1<PHONE_NUMBER>

<< Testing Deviations Arcelor Burns Harbor.PDF >>


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 145 (Thursday, July 28, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49714-49715]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17935]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Eleventh Meeting Special Committee 231 TAWS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Eleventh Meeting Special Committee 231 TAWS.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a
meeting of Eleventh Meeting Special Committee 231 TAWS.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 20-23, 2016, 9:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m. Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Friday.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036. Individuals wishing for WebEx/
Audio information should contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Morrison at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or<PHONE_NUMBER> or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite
910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax at
(202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is
hereby given for a meeting of the Eleventh Meeting Special Committee
231 TAWS. The agenda will include the following:

Tuesday, September 20, 2016--9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

(1) Welcome/Introduction
(2) Administrative Remarks
(3) Agenda Review
(4) Summary of Pre-FRAC comments received on Strawman
(5) Other Business
(6) Date and Place of Next Meeting

Wednesday, Thursday, September 21st, 22nd--9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session

Friday, September 23rd--9:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m.

Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons

wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members
of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any
time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 25, 2016.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17,
NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-17935 Filed 7-27-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: June 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 109)]
[Notices]
[Page 32460]
[DOCID:fr08jn10-89]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP10-438-000]

Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC; Notice of Request
Under Blanket Authorization

May 28, 2010.
    Take notice that on May 20, 2010, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of
America LLC (Natural), 3250 Lacey Road, Suite 700, Downers Grove,
Illinois 60515, filed in Docket No. CP10-438-000, an application
pursuant to sections 157.205, 157.208, 157.211 and 157.212 of the
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) as amended, to
construct and operate facilities necessary to deliver natural gas to
its affiliate, Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline LLC (KMLP) in Johnsons
Bayou, Cameron Parish, Louisiana, under Natural's blanket certificate
issued in Docket No. CP82-402-000,\1\ all as more fully set forth in
the application which is on file with the Commission and open to the
public for inspection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 20 FERC ] 62,415 (1982).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Natural proposes to construct and operate a delivery interconnect
off its UTOS Lateral with the Southwest Louisiana lateral (Southwest
Loop). To accomplish this, Natural would construct and operate
approximately 320 feet of 12-inch diameter pipeline; a dual 8-inch
meter on a new metering platform; and such other appurtenant facilities
required to effect the interconnects to deliver up to 200,000 Dth/day
of natural gas from its UTOS Lateral to KMLP. Natural would also
construct certain section 2.55(a) non-jurisdictional facilities such as
instrumentation and cathodic protection for all piping and equipment.
Natural also states that KMLP would reimburse Natural for the estimated
$2,500,000 construction cost of the proposed facilities.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to Bruce
H. Newsome, Vice President, Regulatory Products and Services, Natural
Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC, 3250 Lacey Road, 7th Floor,
Downers Grove, Illinois 60515-7918, or via telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
or by e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    This filing is available for review at the Commission or may be
viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number filed to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at FERC
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or, for
TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. Comments, protests and interventions may
be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
intervenors to file electronically.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 60 days after
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to section 157.205 of
the regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to the
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and
not withdrawn within 30 days after the allowed time for filing a
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to section 7 of the NGA.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-13557 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P