[Federal Register: February 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 25)]
[Notices]
[Page 6256]
[DOCID:fr08fe10-113]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration
(FRA) has received a request for a waiver of compliance from certain
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party seeking relief, the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.

CSX Transportation, Inc.

(Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-2009-0126)

    The CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) requests a waiver of compliance
from the requirements of 49 CFR part 240, Qualification and
Certification of Locomotive Engineers, specifically Section 129. CSXT's
specific request is for a waiver from the requirement that certain
remote control operators (RCOs) have annual operational performance
evaluations as provided under the procedures pursuant to Sections
240.129(b), (c), and (e).
    Section 240.129(b) requires a railroad to have procedures for
monitoring the operational performance of those it has determined to be
qualified as a ``locomotive engineer.'' Section 240.129(c) provides the
requirements of the procedures referenced under (b), including that the
engineer, ``shall be annually monitored (check ride) by a Designated
Supervisor of Locomotive Engineers'' and is either accompanied by the
designated supervisor'' or ``has his or her train handling activities
electronically recorded.'' CSXT has a program to comply with these
requirements. Section 240.129(e) requires the railroad to have an
operational testing and monitoring program in place, and to perform at
least one unannounced test each calendar year. This program must be
designed to monitor compliance with railroad operating rules and other
directives, and to examine and test such compliance.
    CSXT is using a process whereby the engineer and RCO qualification
endorsement is placed into the employee's crew management profile when
qualified, and the same engineer or RCO endorsement is removed when
certain FRA requirements are not met. Presently, the Manager of FRA
Certification or the System Road Foreman of Engines notifies the Crew
Management Center and has the employee's engineer or RCO status changed
from active to inactive, thereby prohibiting such employee from working
a locomotive engineer's or RCO's assignment.
    CSXT has a number of employees certified under 49 CFR part 240 for
RCO service who are not currently performing the duties that require
this certification. Some of these individuals have bid on and taken
positions in other service while others have been furloughed. As a
result, these individuals are not in a position to operate remote
control equipment. CSXT requests relief from Section 240.129 to avoid
having to perform operational performance evaluations on individuals
who are currently out of RCO service. Waiving performance of these
evaluations on individuals not currently active as RCOs is consistent
with the general application of Part 240, which applies to ``any person
who operates locomotives.''
    These individuals are not working as RCOs, nor will they be allowed
to work as RCOs under CSXT's control system. Performance of the
operational evaluation on individuals not currently working as RCOs
causes safety concerns because it requires calling a person in for the
sole purpose of an evaluation and also because it would lead to those
individuals achieving technical compliance with the rule only to go
back to prolonged service in areas other than a RCO.
    If CSXT's waiver request is granted, CSXT will provide any RCO
wishing to return to active service a monitoring observation and an
unannounced operating rule operational test within 30 days of the
employee's return to RCO service.
    CSXT requests this waiver as a method of ensuring that active RCOs
receive timely and appropriate training and monitoring as required for
compliance with the rule. Through granting this waiver, CSXT believes
there will be no negative impact on safety. As described, CSXT will not
permit any RCO to operate a remote control locomotive without being in
full compliance with part 240, including Section 129, of which relief
is requested. CSXT believes this process will promote enhanced safety
by providing for the operational performance evaluations to be done as
these RCOs return to active service when safe operation of the
equipment is their focus.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-
2009-0126) and may be submitted by any of the following methods:
     Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
    Communications received within 45 days of the date of this notice
will be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at the above
facility. All documents in the public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web
site at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the document (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in
the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477) or at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.html.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 2, 2010.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. 2010-2606 Filed 2-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23021-23023]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08938]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-77600; File No. SR-BatsBYX-2016-04]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats BYX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the Certificate of Incorporation of the Exchange's Ultimate Parent
Company, Bats Global Markets, Inc.

April 13, 2016.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 8, 2016, Bats BYX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BYX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
has designated this proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder,\4\ which renders it effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to amend the certificate of
incorporation of the Exchange's ultimate parent company, Bats Global
Markets, Inc. (the ``Corporation'').
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    On December 16, 2015, the Corporation, the ultimate parent entity
of the Exchange, filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the
Commission seeking to register shares of common stock and to conduct an
initial public offering of those shares, which will be listed for
trading on the Exchange (the ``IPO''). In connection with its IPO, the
Corporation intends to amend and restate its certificate of
incorporation (the ``New Certificate of Incorporation''). The Exchange
previously received Commission approval of certain substantive
amendments to the certificate of incorporation of the Corporation that
comprise changes included in the New Certificate of Incorporation.\5\
Since that date, the Corporation has determined it to be necessary to
further amend its certificate of incorporation to achieve the final,
pre-IPO version of the New Certificate of Incorporation. The additional
amendments will be achieved through the filing with the State of
Delaware of a certificate of

amendment to the New Certificate of Incorporation. The additional
amendments are described in further detail below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77464 (March 29,
2016), 81 FR 19252 (April 1, 2016) (SR-BATS-2016-010; SR-BYX-2016-
02; SR-EDGX-2016-04; SR-EDGA-2016-01).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange, on behalf of the Corporation, proposes changes to the
New Certificate of Incorporation in connection with a forward stock
split, pursuant to which each share of common stock of the Corporation
outstanding or held in treasury immediately prior to the completion of
the IPO would automatically and without action on the part of the
holders thereof be subdivided into 2.91 shares of common stock (the
``Stock Split'').\6\ Accordingly, the number of authorized shares of
the Corporation, both in the aggregate and as set forth by class, as
codified in paragraph (a)(i) of Article Fourth of the New Certificate
of Incorporation, will be adjusted. The Corporation also plans to
adjust the preferred stock of the Corporation consistent with the Stock
Split. The par value of the Corporation's common stock will remain
$0.01 per share.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Common stock consists of voting common stock and non-voting
common stock of the Corporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of this rule filing is to permit the Corporation, the
ultimate parent company of the Exchange, to adopt an amendment to the
New Certificate of Incorporation, as described in this proposal. The
changes described herein relate to the certificate of incorporation of
the Corporation only, not to the governance of the Exchange. The
Exchange will continue to be governed by its existing certificate of
incorporation and bylaws. The stock in, and voting power of, the
Exchange will continue to be directly and solely held by Bats Global
Markets Holdings, Inc., an intermediate holding company wholly-owned by
the Corporation, and the governance of the Exchange will continue under
its existing structure.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and rules and regulations thereunder that are
applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular, with
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\7\ In particular, the
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(1) of the Act, because it
retains, without modification, the existing limitations on ownership
and total voting power that currently exist and that are designed to
prevent any stockholder from exercising undue control over the
operation of the Exchange and to assure that the Exchange is able to
carry out its regulatory obligations under the Act. Under the proposal,
the Corporation is making certain administrative and structural changes
to the New Certificate of Incorporation. These changes, however, do not
impact the governance of the Exchange nor do they modify the ownership
of the Corporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change imposes
any burden on competition. As described above, the proposed rule change
is simply to make certain administrative and structural changes to the
New Certificate of Incorporation. These changes do not impact the
governance of the Exchange nor do they modify the ownership of the
Corporation.

(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any written comments from members or other interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\9\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \11\ In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange to
give the Commission written notice of the Exchange's intent to file
the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of
the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the
date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as
designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the Act
\12\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date of
filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \13\ permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal
may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange states that
the Corporation's IPO may occur in the near future, and the changes
described in this notice are a critical component of such IPO. The
Exchange states that waiver of the operative delay will allow the
Corporation to promptly move forward with the IPO without delay. The
Commission notes that the Exchange represents that there are no changes
to the provisions of the New Certificate of Incorporation that impact
the ownership or governance of the Exchange, and that instead, the
amendments reflect administrative and structural amendments to the New
Certificate of Incorporation. Based on the foregoing, the Commission
believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest.\14\ The Commission
hereby grants the Exchange's request and designates the proposal
operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \14\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BatsBYX-2016-04 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BatsBYX-2016-04. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BatsBYX-2016-04 and should
be submitted on or before May 10, 2016.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-08938 Filed 4-18-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: October 24, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 207)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 63420]
[DOCID:fr24oc08-27]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0008; FRL-8733-2]
RIN 2060-AO91

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant
Emissions: Group I Polymers and Resins (Epichlorohydrin Elastomers
Production, HypalonTM Production, Nitrile Butadiene Rubber
Production, Polybutadiene Rubber Production, and Styrene Butadiene
Rubber and Latex Production); Marine Vessel Loading Operations; Mineral
Wool Production; Pharmaceuticals Production; and Printing and
Publishing Industry; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the preamble to a proposed rule
published in the Federal Register of October 10, 2008, regarding the
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions:
Group I Polymers and Resins (Epichlorohydrin Elastomers Production,
HypalonTM Production, Nitrile Butadiene Rubber Production,
Polybutadiene Rubber Production, and Styrene Butadiene Rubber and Latex
Production); Marine Vessel Loading Operations; Mineral Wool Production;
Pharmaceuticals Production; and Printing and Publishing Industry. This
correction clarifies the date of the public hearing (if a public
hearing is requested).

DATES: If a public hearing is held, it will be held on October 27,
2008.

ADDRESSES: If a public hearing is held, it will begin at 10 a.m. and
will be held at EPA's campus in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina,
or at an alternate facility nearby.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about this proposed
action, contact Ms. Mary Tom Kissell, Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Coatings and
Chemicals Group (E143-01), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; and e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Correction

    If a public hearing is held, it will be held on October 27, 2008,
beginning at 10 a.m. If a public hearing is held, it will be held at
EPA's campus in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, or at an
alternate facility nearby.

    Dated: October 16, 2008.
Robert J. Meyers,
Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator.
 [FR Doc. E8-25514 Filed 10-23-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


                                 DRAFT AGENDA                    US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)                      FIFRA SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY PANEL (SAP)                                   OPEN MEETING                               SEPTEMBER 11-14, 2012               FIFRA SAP WEB SITE http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/                       OPP Docket Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>                       Docket Number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0543.                      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency                          Conference Center Lobby Level                         One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.)                   2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202                                             Scientific Issues Associated with Pollinator Risk Assessment Framework                                            Please note that all times are approximate (see note at end of Agenda).                                      Day 1                           Tuesday, September 11, 2012

9:00 A.M. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures  -  Fred Jenkins, Ph.D. Designated Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy, EPA

9:05 A.M. Introduction and Identification of Panel Members  -  Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D., FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Chair  9:10 A.M. Welcome and Opening Remarks  -  Steven Bradbury, Ph.D., Director, Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), EPA

9:25 A.M. EPA Presentations

10:30 A.M. Break

12:00 P.M. Lunch

1:10 P.M. EPA Presentations (Cont'd)

2:00 P.M. Break

2:15 P.M. EPA Presentations (Cont'd)

5:30 P.M. Adjourn

                                    Day 2                          Wednesday, September 12, 2012

9:00 A.M. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures  -  Fred Jenkins, Ph.D. Designated Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy, EPA

9:05 A.M. Introduction and Identification of Panel Members  -  Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D., FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Session Chair

9:10 A.M. Follow-up from the previous day presentations

9:40 A.M. Public Comments

10:30 A.M Break

10:40 A.M. Public Comments (Cont'd)

12:00 P.M. Lunch

1:15 P.M. Public Comments (Cont'd)

3:30 P.M. Break

3:45 P.M. Charge to Panel

5:30 P.M. Adjourn

                                    Day 3                           Thursday, September 13, 2012

9:00 A.M. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures  -  Fred Jenkins, Ph.D. Designated Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy, EPA

9:05 A.M. Introduction and Identification of Panel Members  -  Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D., FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Session Chair

9:10 A.M. Follow-up from the previous day discussions

9:30 A.M. Charge to Panel (Cont'd)

10:30 A.M. Break

10:45 A.M. Charge to Panel (Cont'd)

12:00 P.M. Lunch

1:15 P.M. Charge to Panel (Cont'd)

2:45 P.M. Break

3:00 P.M. Charge to Panel (Cont'd)

5:30 P.M. Adjourn

                                    Day 4                            Friday, September 14, 2012

9:00 A.M. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures  -  Fred Jenkins, Ph.D. Designated Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy, EPA

9:05 A.M. Introduction and Identification of Panel Members  -  Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D., FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Session Chair

9:10 A.M. Follow-up from the previous day discussions

9:30 A.M. Charge to Panel (Cont'd)

10:30 A.M. Break

10:45 A.M. Charge to Panel (Cont'd)

12:00 P.M. Lunch

1:15 P.M. Charge to Panel (Cont'd)

2:45 P.M. Break

3:00 P.M. Charge to Panel (Cont'd)

4:30 P.M. Adjourn

Please be advised that agenda times are approximate; when the discussion for one topic is completed, discussions for the next topic will begin. For further information, please contact the Designated Federal Official for this meeting, Dr. Fred Jenkins, via telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>


MEMORANDUM

DATE:	January 2015

SUBJECT:	40 CFR Part 60, Subparts AAA and QQQQ Estimated Three-Year and Annual Respondent Burden Cost of Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements (Years 2018 to 2020).

FROM:	Joanne O'Loughlin and Beth Friedman, EC/R Incorporated

TO:		Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734

1.0	PURPOSE

      The phased implementation schedule for the new source performance standards (NSPS) for new residential wood heaters (40 CFR part 60, revised subpart AAA and subpart QQQQ) results in differing recordkeeping and reporting impacts because it includes a two-step emission standards approach, each with different compliance dates. For purposes of this memorandum, we refer to these stepped emission standards as Step 1 and Step 2. The compliance date for meeting Step 1 emission standards provided in the rules occurs in 2015 for most types of wood heaters, and the compliance date for meeting Step 2 emission standards provided in the rules occurs in 2020. The recordkeeping and reporting respondent burden estimates included in the information collection requests (ICR) supporting statements for 40 CFR part 60, subparts AAA and subpart QQQQ include respondent burden estimates for years 2015 to 2017. The purpose of this memorandum is to document the recordkeeping and reporting respondent burden cost estimates (hourly labor and associated costs and not capital costs) as a result of the final amended rule for subpart AAA and final rule for subpart QQQQ for years 2018 to 2020. Section 2 presents a summary of the recordkeeping and reporting requirements for manufacturers, third-party certifiers and testing laboratories, and the number of respondents subject to subpart AAA and subpart QQQQ. The estimated recordkeeping and reporting respondent burden for years 2018 to 2020 for subpart AAA and subpart QQQQ are presented in Attachment 1 (subpart AAA) and Attachment 2 (subpart QQQQ) to this memorandum.

2.0	SUBPART AAA AND SUBPART QQQQ RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND THE NUMBER OF AFFECTED RESPONDENTS

2.1 Summary of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements under Subparts AAA and QQQQ

      Subpart AAA and subpart QQQQ require manufacturers of new residential wood heaters, hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces, test laboratories and third-party certifiers to submit reports and to maintain records for demonstrating and documenting compliance. A third-party certification process is required. Under this process, for all heaters/stoves subject to subpart AAA and subpart QQQQ, after testing is completed by an approved test laboratory, a certification of conformity with the particulate matter emissions standards must be issued by a third-party certifier with whom the manufacturer has entered into contract for certification services. In order to avoid the potential for manufacturer model certification delays, subpart AAA and subpart QQQQ allow for automatic certification for wood heaters that meet Step 1 emission standards until the Step 2 emission standard compliance date (2020). Certifications are valid for 5 years, after which manufacturers need to either recertify or renew their model certifications.

      The third-party certifier is an independent third party that is ISO accredited to perform certifications, inspections and audits by an accreditation body. Accredited third-party certifiers under subpart AAA must maintain records of all certification tests, quality assurance (QA) program inspections and QA audit performance tests. The third-party certifier can certify conformity if the emission tests have been conducted per the appropriate guidelines; the test report is complete and accurate; the instrumentation used for the test was properly calibrated; the test report shows that the representative affected wood heater meets the applicable emission limits; and the QA plan prepared by the manufacturer is adequate to ensure that units within the model line will be similar in all material respects that would affect emissions to the wood heater submitted for certification testing. The third-party certifier is also required to conduct regular (at least annual) unannounced audits to ensure that the manufacturer's QA plan is being implemented and must prepare a report for each audit that fully documents the results of the audit. The manufacturer must include in its contract with the third-party certifier the authorization and requirement to submit all such reports to the Administrator.

      Test laboratories must be approved by the EPA as test laboratories for subpart AAA and subpart QQQQ before beginning certification testing. Accredited approved test laboratories must maintain records of all certification tests, proficiency tests and compliance audit test data. Current EPA-accredited laboratories may retain their accreditation and may conduct testing as approved test labs until 3 years after the effective date of this rule (by 2018).

      As of the year 2018, for both subpart AAA and subpart QQQQ, the third-party certifier-based process will have already been established; and we assume that all laboratories that will apply for accreditation and approval as third-party certifiers and test laboratories will have been completed. The respondent recordkeeping and reporting burden estimates presented in this memorandum assume that there is an overlap of laboratories that will obtain accreditation and approval as approved testing laboratories and as third-party certifiers under subpart AAA and subpart QQQQ. The only approved testing laboratory and third-party certifier recordkeeping and reporting burden costs not passed on to the manufacturer would be the burden associated with obtaining ISO accreditation (accounted for in burden estimates prepared for 2015-2017), proficiency testing and reporting required for approved test laboratories to maintain accreditation and approval as test labs, and specified recordkeeping requirements (e.g., certification tests, proficiency tests, QA program inspections, audit test results).

      Manufacturers of new residential wood heaters, hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces are required to submit applications for certification/recertification of model lines, submit results of emissions tests conducted to demonstrate that the model lines would comply with the emission limits and produce certified units according to a QA plan approved by an independent third-party certifier. The final rule allows heaters/stove models that meet specified EPA criteria that show compliance with the Step 1 emission standards to be automatically certified to meet the Step 1 emission standards under this final rule until the Step 2 emission standards compliance date. Manufacturers must submit a notification of the initial test and biennial reports that each certified model line remains unchanged. Manufacturers must also maintain records of all certification data, maintain results of QA program inspections and emissions test data, and seal and store the tested appliance.

      Manufacturers of new residential wood heaters, hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces are also required to apply permanent labels on each applicable unit prior to sale. These labels provide important compliance information to enforcement officials and important information to consumers for purchasing appliances. The permanent label requirements are assumed to be a capital cost per model developed and are not included in our respondent recordkeeping and reporting hourly burden estimates. Although not required, owners and operators of appliances subject to subpart AAA and subpart QQQQ also have the option of applying temporary labels for their cleanest heaters that meet or exceed the Step 2 emission standards prior to the Step 2 emissions standards 2020 compliance date. This optional temporary label allowance, if adopted by a manufacturer, would inform consumers of their status as already meeting the Step 2 emission standards 2020 compliance date. Additionally, subpart AAA and subpart QQQQ also allow wood heater manufacturers the option of applying temporary labels to wood heaters, hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces that meet Step 2 emission standards based on cord wood instead of crib wood, allowing consumers to select heaters better tuned to in-home performance. The cost of temporary labels is not included in our recordkeeping and reporting hourly burden estimates because they are not required by subparts AAA and QQQQ.

      Subpart AAA and subpart QQQQ include provisions that the EPA may select a wood heater, hydronic heater or forced-air furnace model for compliance audit testing. The testing of the model would be at the manufacturer's expense. For purposes of estimating respondent recordkeeping and reporting burden estimates, we assumed that this is an infrequent request and that only one audit affecting one manufacturer would occur in the 2018 to 2020 three-year period. Although the capital costs that would be associated with testing are not included in our respondent recordkeeping and reporting burden costs, we have included the manufacturer burden hours that would be associated with an EPA compliance audit.

      Other non-routine and infrequent (if at all) recordkeeping and reporting requirements, such as the need for responses due to revocation or certification and/or laboratory accreditation and hearing and appeals procedures, are not included in the respondent recordkeeping and reporting burden estimates presented in this memorandum. Requests for waivers are also not included in the respondent recordkeeping and reporting burden estimates because they would, when granted, eliminate other reporting and recordkeeping burdens.

      Lastly, subpart AAA and subpart QQQQ require owners and operators of wood heaters, hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces to operate their appliances consistent with the owner's manual for their model; and owners and operators of pellet fuel appliances are required to operate their pellet fuel appliances with specified grades of pellet fuels. Manufacturers are required to void warranties in cases of improper operation. Owner's manual content development requirements are a one-time manufacturer capital cost per certified model and are not included in the respondent recordkeeping and reporting hourly burden estimates.  There are no associated recordkeeping and reporting requirements for owners and operators.

      In summary, the components of recordkeeping and reporting respondent burden estimates for subpart AAA and subpart QQQQ are test notifications, applications for certification, biennial reporting for certified models, applications for accreditation, test report submittals, QA audit reports and test lab proficiency reporting.

2.2 Number of Respondents Subject to Subpart AAA and Subpart QQQQ Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements

      There are approximately 66 manufacturers and 6 laboratories (inclusive of test labs and third-party certifiers) that would be subject to the final amended subpart AAA. As discussed in the manufacturer cost impacts memo, we estimate that there are currently 125 model lines of adjustable burn rate stoves produced by 34 manufacturers, 20 model lines of single burn rate stoves produced by 3 manufacturers and 125 model lines of pellet stoves produced by 29 manufacturers. We assume that 90% of existing adjustable burn rate models (0.9 X 125 models = 112.5)(34 manufacturers), 25% of existing pellet stove models (0.25 X 125 models = 31.25)(29 manufacturers), and 0% of single burn rate stove models (0 X 20 = 0) (3 manufacturers) will meet EPA criteria as meeting Step 1 emission standards, and therefore will qualify for automatic certification approval until 2020. For years 2018 to 2020, we assume that 270 models will be either newly certified or recertified under subpart AAA. We also assume that, as of 2018, there will be 6 approved test laboratories and 4 approved third-party certifiers under subpart AAA.

      There are approximately 30 hydronic heater manufacturers, 7 forced-air furnace manufacturers and 4 test laboratories that would be subject to subpart QQQQ. For forced-air furnaces, compliance with work practice/operational standards is required in 2015, and compliance with Step 1 emission limits for small (<65,000 BTU/hr models) and large furnaces (> 65,000 BTU/hr models) is required in 2016 and 2017, respectively. As discussed in the manufacturer costs impacts memo, we estimate that there are currently 50 model lines of forced-air furnaces produced by 7 manufacturers and 120 model lines of hydronic heaters (about 10 percent of which are indoor hydronic heaters) produced by 30 manufacturers. We assume that of these 170 existing model lines, 55 models (approximately 5 forced air furnace models and 50 hydronic heater models) will meet EPA criteria as meeting Step 1 emission standards and will qualify for automatic certification approval until 2020 and that 115 forced-air furnace models will certify to comply with Step 1 emission standards between 2015 and 2017. For years 2018 to 2020, we assume that 170 models will be either newly certified or recertified under subpart QQQQ. We assume that, as of 2018, there will be 4 approved test laboratories and 4 approved third-party certifiers under subpart QQQQ.

2.3 Summary of the Burden Estimates Associated with Subpart AAA and Subpart QQQQ Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for Years 2018 to 2020

	Attachment 1 presents the subpart AAA recordkeeping and reporting burden estimates for years 2018 to 2020. For years 2018-2020, the average annual burden for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements in subpart AAA for the estimated 72 respondents (66 manufacturers and 6 laboratories (including test laboratories and third-party certifiers) that will be subject to the New Residential Wood Heater NSPS is estimated to be 5,105 person-hours, with an average annual labor cost of $434,037 (approximately $352,000 for manufacturers, $9,000 for third-party certifiers and $73,000 for test laboratories). Attachment 2 presents the subpart QQQQ recordkeeping and reporting burden estimates for years 2018 to 2020. For years 2018-2020, the average annual burden for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements in subpart QQQQ for the estimated 41 respondents (37 manufacturers and 4 laboratories (including test laboratories and third-party certifiers) that will be subject to the New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces NSPS is estimated to be 3,061 person-hours, with an average annual labor cost of $250,309 (approximately $197,000 for manufacturers, $5,000 for third-party certifiers and $49,000 for test laboratories). The average hourly rates used for technical, management and clerical estimates are the same rates that were used for estimates for years 2015 to 2017.

                                 ATTACHMENT 1 NEW RESIDENTIAL WOOD HEATER NSPS (SUBPART AAA) RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING BURDEN (YEARS 2018-2020)

                                                                                ATTACHMENT 2 NEW RESIDENTIAL HYDRONIC HEATERS AND FORCED-AIR FURNACES NSPS (SUBPART QQQQ) RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING BURDEN (YEARS 2018-2020)


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 28602]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11531]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2013-0231]

Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee: Intercessional
Meeting

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of Federal advisory committee working group meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A working group of the Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory
Committee (MERPAC) will meet to work on Task Statement 83, entitled
``Development of competency requirements to meet the provisions of
Table A-III/2 of the Convention on the Standards of Training,
Certification and Watchkeeping (1978), as amended (STCW), for personnel
working on small vessels with high horsepower.'' This meeting will be
open to the public.

DATES: A MERPAC working group will meet on June 11, 2013, and June 12,
2013, from 8 a.m. until 4 p.m. Please note that the meeting may adjourn
early if all business is finished. Written comments to be distributed
to working group members and placed on MERPAC's Web site are due by May
28, 2013.

ADDRESSES: The working group will meet at U.S. Coast Guard
Headquarters, Room 6103, 2100 Second St. SW., Washington, DC 20593.
Attendees will be required to provide a picture identification card and
pass through a magnetometer in order to gain admittance to the Coast
Guard Headquarters Building. Visitors should also arrive at least 30
minutes in advance of the meeting in case of long lines at the
entrance.
    For further information about the Coast Guard facilities or
services for individuals with disabilities or to request special
assistance, contact Mr. Davis Breyer at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    To facilitate public participation, we are inviting public comment
on the issues to be considered by the working group, which are listed
in the ``Agenda'' section below. Written comments must be identified by
Docket No. USCG-2013-0231 and may be submitted by one of the following
methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments (preferred method to
avoid delays in processing).
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department
of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. The
telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the words
``Department of Homeland Security'' and the docket number for this
action. Comments received will be posted without alteration at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. You
may review a Privacy Act notice regarding our public dockets in the
January 17, 2008, issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
    Docket: For access to the docket to read documents or comments
related to this notice, go to http://www.regulations.gov.
    This notice may be viewed in our online docket, USCG-2013-0231, at
http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Davis Breyer, Alternate Designated
Federal Officer of MERPAC, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. If you have any
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is given under the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. (Pub. L. 92-463).
    MERPAC is an advisory committee authorized under section 871 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002, Title 6, United States Code, section
451, and chartered under the provisions of the FACA. The Committee acts
solely in an advisory capacity to the Secretary of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) through the Commandant of the Coast Guard and
the Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards on matters
relating to personnel in the U.S. merchant marine, including but not
limited to training, qualifications, certification, documentation, and
fitness standards. The Committee will advise, consult with, and make
recommendations reflecting its independent judgment to the Secretary.

Agenda

Day 1

    The agenda for the June 11, 2013, working group meeting is as
follows:
    (1) Develop competency requirements to meet the provisions of Table
A-III/2 of the STCW for personnel working on small vessels with high
horsepower;
    (2) Public comment period;
    (3) Discuss and prepare proposed recommendations for the full
committee to consider with regards to Task Statement 83, entitled
``Development of competency requirements to meet the provisions of
Table A-III/2 of the STCW for personnel working on small vessels with
high horsepower''; and
    (4) Adjournment of meeting.

Day 2

    The agenda for the June 12, 2013, working group meeting is as
follows:
    (1) Continue discussion on proposed recommendations;
    (2) Public comment period;
    (3) Discuss and prepare final recommendations for the full
committee to consider with regards to Task Statement 83, entitled
``Development of competency requirements to meet the provisions of
Table A-III/2 of the STCW for personnel working on small vessels with
high horsepower''; and
    (4) Adjournment of meeting.
    Procedural: A copy of all meeting documentation, including the Task
Statement, is available at https://homeport.uscg.mil by using these key
strokes: Missions; Ports and Waterways; Safety Advisory Committees;
MERPAC; and then use the event key. Alternatively, you may contact Mr.
Breyer as noted in the ADDRESSES section above.
    Public oral comment periods will be held during the working group
meeting. Speakers are requested to limit their comments to 3 minutes.
Please note that the public oral comment periods may end before the
prescribed ending time following the last call for comments. Contact
Davis Breyer as indicated above no later than June 4, 2013 to register
as a speaker.

    Dated: May 8, 2013.
J.G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2013-11531 Filed 5-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 1, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39473-39475]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13210]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2019-1022; Airspace Docket No. 19-ANM-81]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of Class E Airspace and Establishment of Class E
Airspace Extension; Port Angeles, WA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action modifies the Class E surface area, Class E
airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface and creates
Class E airspace as an extension to the Class E surface area at William
R Fairchild International Airport, Port Angeles, WA. Following a review
of the airspace, the FAA found it necessary to modify the existing
airspace for William R Fairchild Airport for the safety and management
of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the Airport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, September 10, 2020. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
Title 1 Code of Federal Regulations part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11D at NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Roberts, Federal Aviation
Administration, Western Service Center, Operations Support Group, 2200
S 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it modifies the existing Class E airspace and establishes new Class
E airspace as an extension to the Class E surface area at William R
Fairchild International Airport, Port Angeles, WA, in support of IFR
operations at the airport.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (85 FR 8779; February 18, 2020) for Docket No. FAA-2019-1022
to modify the existing Class E airspace and establish new Class E
airspace as an extension to the Class E surface area at William R
Fairchild International Airport, Port Angeles, WA. Interested parties
were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting

written comments on the proposal to the FAA. Four comments were
received. Two comments were in favor of the proposal and two were
related to a proposal related to unmanned aircraft (UAV). The comments
related to UAVs are not considered substantive to this proposal.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6002, 6004
and 6005 of FAA Order 7400.11D, dated August 8, 2019, and effective
September 15, 2019, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
The Class E airspace designation listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order. FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, is published yearly and effective on
September 15.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and effective September 15,
2019. FAA Order 7400.11D is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11D lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    The FAA is amending Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by amending the Class E airspace description for William R
Fairchild International Airport, Port Angeles, WA. This action is being
submitted coincidental with an FAA proposal, Docket No. FAA-2019-1023;
19-ANM-94 to establish Class E airspace for Port Angeles CGAS, Port
Angeles, WA. That action will provide the airspace needed for
independent operations at Port Angeles CGAS to facilitate training and
mission accomplishment. This action will modify the airspace at William
R Fairchild International Airport, Port Angeles, WA, to only that
airspace needed for their operations. The Class E surface area will be
modified to include the airspace within 4.1 miles of the airport from
the 235[deg] bearing clockwise to the 120[deg] bearing and exclude the
airspace within 1.5 miles of the Port Angeles CGAS. This exclusion will
allow independent air traffic operations at the Port Angeles CGAS when
weather conditions at this location varies from those at the William R
Fairchild International Airport.
    A Class E extension to the surface area will be established 2 miles
both sides of the 284[deg] bearing extending from the 4.1-mile radius
to 8 miles west of the airport. This will provide the airspace required
for the RNAV approach to runway 8, as aircraft descend through 1000
feet AGL.
    The Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet AGL will be
modified to within 4.1 miles of William R Fairchild International
Airport and that area 3.1 miles on both sides of the 284[deg] bearing
from the airport to 11 miles west. This area will provide airspace for
the RNAV and the ILS Approach to runway 8, as aircraft descend through
1500 feet. To the southeast, the airspace extending upward from 700
feet AGL will be modified to 1-mile north and 4 miles south of the
105[deg] bearing from the 4.1-mile radius to 7 miles from the airport.
    This action will remove the Class E surface airspace 3 miles north
and 2.2 miles south of the William R Fairchild international Airport
079[deg] bearing extending from the 4.1-mile radius to 11.4 miles east
of the airport, as it is not needed for operations at William R.
Fairchild airport. This airspace will support IFR operations at William
R Fairchild Airport, Port Angeles, WA.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and
effective September 15, 2019, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

ANM WA E2 Port Angeles, WA [Amended]

William R. Fairchild International Airport, WA
    (Lat. 48[deg]07'13'' N, long. 123[deg]29'59'' W)
Port Angeles CGAS
    (Lat. 48[deg]08'29'' N, long. 123[deg]24'50'' W)

    That airspace within a 4.1-mile radius of the William R.
Fairchild International Airport from the 235[deg] bearing clockwise
to the 120[deg] bearing excluding the airspace within 1.5 miles of
the Port Angeles CGAS.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to
a Class D or Class E Surface Area.

* * * * *

ANM WA E4 Port Angeles, WA [New]

William R. Fairchild International Airport, WA
    (Lat. 48[deg]07'13'' N, long. 123[deg]29'59'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 2 miles
both sides of the 284[deg] bearing extending from the 4.1 mile
radius to 8 miles west of the airport.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ANM WA E5 Port Angeles, WA [Amended]

William R. Fairchild International Airport, WA
    (Lat. 48[deg]07'13'' N, long. 123[deg]29'59'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 4.1-mile radius of the William R. Fairchild International
Airport, and within 1 mile north and 4 miles south of the William R.
Fairchild International Airport 105[deg] bearing

extending from the 4.1-mile radius to 7 miles east of the airport
and that airspace 3.1 miles each side of the 284[deg] bearing from
the 4.1-mile radius to 11 miles west of the airport.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on June 15, 2020.
Shawn M. Kozica,
Group Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2020-13210 Filed 6-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P