Agenda for the June 22, 2006 Call with AGC, ARTBA and NAHB on the
SAFETEA-LU

Conformity Rulemaking

Introductions

Opportunity for questions on the February 14, 2006 interim SAFETEA-LU
conformity guidance.  [A copy of the guidance is available at:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/conformity/sec6011guidmemo.htm]

How EPA is planning to address:

      Conformity Redeterminations

      Frequency

      Lapse Grace Period

      Conformity SIPs

      Horizons

      TCM Substitution

Feedback on our plans

General Plans for the Rulemaking

Major Topics of  Discussion During the June 22, 2006 Call with AGC,
ARTBA and NAHB on the SAFETEA-LU Conformity Rulemaking

Participants: EPA, AGC, ARTBA, NAHB

Major Topics of Discussion:

Overview of the transportation conformity-related Clean Air Act
amendments made by SAFETEA-LU

General plans and timeline for the SAFETEA-LU conformity rulemaking

Questions asked by the participants:

Will areas designated nonattainment for new/revised air quality
standards be eligible for the one-year new nonattainment area grace
period?

What is a donut area and how is conformity determined in such an area?

How have metropolitan planning organizations reacted to the frequency,
redeterminations, and horizon provisions contained in SAFETEA-LU?

If a budget is first found adequate and then approved, does that trigger
the requirement for another conformity determination?

What SIP actions would trigger a conformity determination?  Would a SIP
disapproval ever trigger a conformity determination?

Could areas take advantage of the lapse grace period provision to avoid
making some conformity determinations in response to the SIP triggers?

How does the change in frequency from 3 years to 4 years work?

Will isolated rural areas be eligible to use the horizon provision in
SAFETEA-LU?


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 8, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1155-1158]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00069]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-18033; Directorate Identifier 2004-CE-16-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to revise an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to all Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) Models 190, 195
(L-126A,B,C), 195A, and 195B airplanes that are equipped with certain
inboard aileron hinge brackets. The existing AD currently requires you
to repetitively inspect the affected inboard aileron hinge brackets for
cracks or corrosion and replace them if cracks or corrosion is found.
Replacement with aluminum brackets would terminate the need for

the repetitive inspections. Since we issued AD 2004-21-08, the FAA, in
recent months, has received reports of confusion between the casting
number on the aileron hinge bracket and the part number (P/N) called
out in the AD. This proposed AD would retain the actions of AD 2004-21-
08 while requiring future compliance following a revised service
bulletin that clarifies the casting numbers and part numbers to be
inspected. We are proposing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on
these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by February 22,
2013.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Cessna
Aircraft Company, Customer service, P.O. Box 7706, Wichita, KS 67277;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.cessnasupport.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, MO 64106. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Park, Aerospace Engineer, Wichita
ACO, FAA, 1801 Airport Road, Wichita, KS 67209; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-
18033; Directorate Identifier 2004-CE-16-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On October 13, 2004, we issued AD 2004-21-08, amendment 39-13828
(69 FR 62396, October 26, 2004), for all Cessna Models 190, 195 (L-
126A,B,C), 195A, and 195B airplanes that are equipped with certain
inboard aileron hinge brackets. That AD requires you to repetitively
inspect the affected inboard aileron hinge brackets for cracks or
corrosion and replace them if cracks or corrosion is found. Replacement
with aluminum brackets would terminate the need for the repetitive
inspections.
    AD 2004-21-08 (69 FR 62396, October 26, 2004) resulted from several
reports of cracks and corrosion found on the magnesium aileron hinge
brackets. Magnesium is known to be susceptible to corrosion. We issued
AD 2004-21-08 (69 FR 62396, October 26, 2004) to detect and correct
corrosion damage to the inboard aileron hinge brackets. Such damage
could result in the brackets cracking across the bearing boss and could
lead to the aileron separating from the airplane with consequent
reduced or loss of control.

Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued

    Since we issued AD 2004-21-08 (69 FR 62396, October 26, 2004), the
FAA, in recent months, has received reports of confusion between the
casting number on the aileron hinge bracket and the P/N called out in
the AD. Due to this misunderstanding, proper inspections and/or
replacement of the aileron hinge bracket may not be occurring following
the AD. In one report, a service center provided an airworthiness
compliance record stating ``aileron hinge brackets are of a different
part  than those specified in the note.'' However, during a
later inspection of the bracket, a crack was found through the bearing
boss.

Relevant Service Information

    We reviewed Cessna Aircraft Company Single Engine Service Bulletin
SEB04-1, dated April 26, 2004, and Single Engine Service Bulletin
SEB04-01, Revision 1, dated October 3, 2012. The service information
describes procedures for:

--Inspecting P/N 0322709 and P/N 0322709-1 inboard aileron hinge
brackets for cracks or corrosion; and
--Replacing any bracket found cracked or corroded with a bracket that
is FAA-approved and made from aluminum.

    Revision 1 of the service information adds casting numbers for the
parts to be inspected and clarifies the inspection.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would retain all requirements of AD 2004-21-08 (69
FR 62396, October 26, 2004) while requiring future compliance following
a revised service bulletin that clarifies the casting numbers and part
numbers to be inspected.

Change to Existing AD

    This proposed AD would retain all requirements of AD 2004-21-08 (69
FR 62396, October 26, 2004). Since AD 2004-21-08 was issued, the AD
format has been revised, and certain paragraphs have been rearranged.
As a result, the corresponding paragraph identifiers have changed in
this proposed AD, as listed in the following table:

                      Revised Paragraph Identifiers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Corresponding requirement in this
    Requirement in AD 2004-21-08                 proposed AD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
          paragraph (e)(1)                        paragraph (h)
          paragraph (e)(2)                        paragraph (i)
          paragraph (e)(3)                        paragraph (j)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 643 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                              Cost per          Cost on U.S.
            Action                    Labor cost           Parts cost         product            operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection of the affected      1 work-hour x $85 per   Not Applicable..             $85   1,180 airplanes x $85
 inboard aileron hinge           hour = $85.                                                = $54,655.
 brackets for cracks or
 corrosion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The new requirements of this proposed AD add no additional
economic burden.
    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the results of the proposed inspection.
We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need
these replacements:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                    Action                                 Labor cost               Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement of left-hand (LH) brackets........  3 work-hours x $85 per hour =             $1,999          $2,254
                                                 $255.
Replacement of right-hand (RH) brackets.......  3 work-hours x $85 per hour =              1,592           1,847
                                                 $255.
Replacement of LH and RH brackets.............  6 work-hours x $85 per hour =              4,101           4,611
                                                 $510.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2004-21-08, Amendment 39-13828 (69 FR 62396, October 26, 2004), and
adding the following new AD:

Cessna Aircraft Company: Docket No. FAA-2012-18033; Directorate
Identifier 2004-CE-16-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by February 22,
2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD revises AD 2004-21-08, Amendment 39-13828.

(c) Applicability

    This AD affects Models 190, 195 (L-126A,B,C), 195A, and 195B
airplanes, all serial numbers, that are:
    (1) Certificated in any category; and
    (2) Equipped with at least one part number (P/N) 0322709 or P/N
0322709-1 inboard aileron hinge bracket.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 2710, Aileron Control System.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of confusion between the casting
number on the aileron hinge bracket and the part number called out
in the AD. We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on
these products.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD at the times specified following the
procedures in Cessna Aircraft Company Single Engine Service Bulletin
SEB04-01, Revision 1, dated October 3, 2012, unless already done.

(g) Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information

    This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraphs (h), (i), and (j) of this AD, if the actions were
performed before the effective date of this AD using Cessna Aircraft
Company Single Engine Service Bulletin SEB04-1, dated April 26,
2004. All actions performed after the effective date of this AD will
be required following Cessna Aircraft Company Single Engine Service
Bulletin SEB04-01, Revision 1, dated October 3, 2012.

(h) Inspect Each P/N 0322709 and P/N 0322709-1 Inboard Aileron Hinge
Bracket or Any Other Bracket Made From Magnesium for Cracks or
Corrosion

    Within the next 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) after November
30, 2004 (the effective date retained from AD 2004-21-08, Amendment
39-13828 (69 FR 62396, October 26, 2004)), and repetitively
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100 hours TIS until each
bracket is replaced with aluminum, inspect each P/N 0322709 and P/N
0322709-1 inboard aileron hinge bracket or any other bracket made
from magnesium for cracks or corrosion.

(i) Replace Any Cracked or Corroded Inboard Aileron Hinge Bracket

    Before further flight after any inspection where any cracked or
corroded bracket is found, replace any cracked or corroded inboard
aileron hinge.
    (1) If replacement is with an FAA-approved bracket made from
magnesium, do the 100-hour TIS interval repetitive inspections as
required in paragraph (h) of this AD.
    (2) If replacement is with an FAA-approved bracket that is made
from aluminum, then no further inspections are necessary. These can
be Cessna parts or non-Cessna parts.

(j) Terminating Action for the Repetitive Inspections

    (1) As terminating action for the repetitive inspections, you
may replace all inboard aileron hinge brackets with FAA-approved
brackets that are made from aluminum (as specified in paragraph
(i)(2) of this AD) regardless if any corrosion or crack is found.
    (2) You may do this replacement at any time, but you must
replace any corroded or cracked bracket before further flight after
the applicable inspection where any corrosion or crack is found.

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) All AMOCs approved for AD 2004-21-08 (69 FR 62396, October
26, 2004) are approved for this AD.

(l) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Gary Park,
Aerospace Engineer, Wichita ACO, FAA, 1801 Airport Road, Wichita, KS
67209; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Cessna Aircraft Company, Customer Service, P.O. Box 7706, Wichita,
KS 67277; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.cessnasupport.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on December 31, 2012.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-00069 Filed 1-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 75 (Thursday, April 18, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16291-16292]
[FR Doc No: 2019-07821]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 33447; File No. 812-14868]

Eaton Vance Growth Trust, et al.

April 15, 2019.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice of an application for an order pursuant to: (a) Section 6(c)
of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') granting an exemption
from sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; (b) section 12(d)(1)(J) of
the Act granting an exemption from section 12(d)(1) of the Act; (c)
sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act granting an exemption from sections
17(a)(1), 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and (d) section 17(d) of
the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act to permit certain joint
arrangements and transactions. Applicants request an order that would
supersede a prior order for similar relief and that would permit
certain registered management investment companies to participate in a
joint lending and borrowing facility.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston, et al., Investment
Company Act Release Nos. 25640 (June 26, 2002) (notice) and 25669
(July 23, 2002) (order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Applicants: The Funds (as defined below) set forth on Exhibit A to
the application, each organized as either a Maryland corporation or a
Massachusetts business trust and registered under the Act as an open-
end or closed-end management investment company, \2\ and Eaton Vance
Management and Boston Management and Research, each a Massachusetts
business trust that is registered as an investment adviser under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (collectively, the ``Applicants'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The Funds (as defined below) that are closed-end management
investment companies will not participate as borrowers in the
interfund lending facility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Filing Dates: The application was filed on January 17, 2018, and
amended on July 13, 2018 and December 20, 2018.
    Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally
or by mail.
    Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m.
on May 10, 2019, and should be accompanied by proof of service on the
applicants, in the form of an affidavit, or, for lawyers, a certificate
of service. Pursuant to Rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should
state the nature of the writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the
desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason for the request,
and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing
may request notification by writing to the Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES:  Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090; Applicants: Maureen Gemma, Eaton
Vance Management, Two International Place, Boston, MA 02110.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Asen Parachkevov, Senior Counsel, or
Andrea Ottomanelli Magovern, Branch Chief, at<PHONE_NUMBER> (Division
of

Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's website by searching for the file number, or an applicant
using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or
by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Summary of the Application

    1. Applicants request an order that would permit the applicants to
participate in an interfund lending facility where each Fund could lend
money directly to and borrow money directly from other Funds to cover
unanticipated cash shortfalls, such as unanticipated redemptions or
trade fails.\3\ The Funds will not borrow under the facility for
leverage purposes and the loans' duration will be no more than 7
days.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Applicants request that the order apply to the Applicants
and to any registered open-end or closed-end management investment
company or series thereof for which Eaton Vance Management or Boston
Management and Research or any successor to either thereto, or an
investment adviser controlling, controlled by, or under common
control with Eaton Vance Management or Boston Management and
Research or any successor to either thereto serves as investment
adviser (each such investment company or series thereof, a ``Fund''
and collectively the ``Funds,'' and each such investment adviser, an
``Adviser''). For purposes of the requested order, ``successor'' is
limited to any entity that results from a reorganization into
another jurisdiction or a change in the type of a business
organization.
    \4\ Any Fund, however, will be able to call a loan on one
business day's notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Applicants anticipate that the proposed facility would provide a
borrowing Fund with a source of liquidity at a rate lower than the bank
borrowing rate at times when the cash position of the Fund is
insufficient to meet temporary cash requirements. In addition, Funds
making short-term cash loans directly to other Funds would earn
interest at a rate higher than they otherwise could obtain from
investing their cash in repurchase agreements or certain other short
term money market instruments. Thus, applicants assert that the
facility would benefit both borrowing and lending Funds.
    3. Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief
will be subject to the terms and conditions stated in the application.
Among others, each Adviser, through a designated committee, would
administer the facility as a disinterested fiduciary as part of its
duties under the investment advisory and administrative services
agreements with the Funds and would receive no additional fee as
compensation for its services in connection with the administration of
the facility. The facility would be subject to oversight and certain
approvals by the Funds' Board, including, among others, approval of the
interest rate formula and of the method for allocating loans across
Funds, as well as review of the process in place to evaluate the
liquidity implications for the Funds. A Fund's aggregate outstanding
interfund loans will not exceed 15% of its net assets, and the Fund's
loans to any one Fund will not exceed 5% of the lending Fund's net
assets.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Under certain circumstances, a borrowing Fund will be
required to pledge collateral to secure the loan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. Applicants assert that the facility does not raise the concerns
underlying section 12(d)(1) of the Act given that the Funds are part of
the same group of investment companies and there will be no duplicative
costs or fees to the Funds.\6\ Applicants also assert that the proposed
transactions do not raise the concerns underlying sections 17(a)(1),
17(a)(3), 17(d) and 21(b) of the Act as the Funds would not engage in
lending transactions that unfairly benefit insiders or are detrimental
to the Funds. Applicants state that the facility will offer both
reduced borrowing costs and enhanced returns on loaned funds to all
participating Funds and each Fund would have an equal opportunity to
borrow and lend on equal terms based on an interest rate formula that
is objective and verifiable. With respect to the relief from section
17(a)(2) of the Act, applicants note that any collateral pledged to
secure an interfund loan would be subject to the same conditions
imposed by any other lender to a Fund that imposes conditions on the
quality of or access to collateral for a borrowing (if the lender is
another Fund) or the same or better conditions (in any other
circumstance).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Applicants state that the obligation to repay an interfund
loan could be deemed to constitute a security for the purposes of
sections 17(a)(1) and 12(d)(1) of the Act.
    \7\ Applicants state that any pledge of securities to secure an
interfund loan could constitute a purchase of securities for
purposes of section 17(a)(2) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. Applicants also believe that the limited relief from section
18(f)(1) of the Act that is necessary to implement the facility
(because the lending Funds are not banks) is appropriate in light of
the conditions and safeguards described in the application and because
the open-end Funds would remain subject to the requirement of section
18(f)(1) that all borrowings of the open-end Fund, including combined
interfund loans and bank borrowings, have at least 300% asset coverage.
    6. Section 6(c) of the Act permits the Commission to exempt any
persons or transactions from any provision of the Act if such exemption
is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with
the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the
policy and provisions of the Act. Section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act
provides that the Commission may exempt any person, security, or
transaction, or any class or classes of persons, securities, or
transactions, from any provision of section 12(d)(1) if the exemption
is consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors.
Section 17(b) of the Act authorizes the Commission to grant an order
permitting a transaction otherwise prohibited by section 17(a) if it
finds that (a) the terms of the proposed transaction are fair and
reasonable and do not involve overreaching on the part of any person
concerned; (b) the proposed transaction is consistent with the policies
of each registered investment company involved; and (c) the proposed
transaction is consistent with the general purposes of the Act. Rule
17d-1(b) under the Act provides that in passing upon an application
filed under the rule, the Commission will consider whether the
participation of the registered investment company in a joint
enterprise, joint arrangement or profit sharing plan on the basis
proposed is consistent with the provisions, policies and purposes of
the Act and the extent to which such participation is on a basis
different from or less advantageous than that of the other
participants.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-07821 Filed 4-17-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 6, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38248-38250]
[FR Doc No: 2019-16726]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG19-158-000.
    Applicants: Wright Solar Park LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Wright Solar Park LLC.
    Filed Date: 7/31/19.
    Accession Number: 20190731-5102.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/21/19.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1906-001; ER16-221-002; ER18-1907-001; ER17-

1757-002; ER10-1767-004; ER10-1532-004; ER10-1541-005; ER10-1642-006;
ER13-2349-003; ER13-2350-003.
    Applicants: Entergy Arkansas, LLC, Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy
Mississippi, LLC, Entergy New Orleans, LLC, Entergy Texas, Inc.,
Entergy Nuclear Palisades, LLC, Entergy Power, LLC, EWO Marketing, LLC,
EAM Nelson Holding, LLC, RS Cogen, LLC.
    Description: Supplement to June 24, 2019 Notification of Change in
Status [Attachment B--Excel format] of the Entergy Central MBR
Utilities.
    Filed Date: 7/26/19.
    Accession Number: 20190726-5175.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/5/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1918-003.
    Applicants: Kestrel Acquisition, LLC.
    Description: Report Filing: Refund Report 2019 to 5 to be effective
N/A.
    Filed Date: 7/31/19.
    Accession Number: 20190731-5141.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/21/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1936-001.
    Applicants: Idaho Power Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Response to Deficiency Letter
Regarding Order Nos. 845 and 845-A Filing to be effective 5/22/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/30/19.
    Accession Number: 20190730-5101.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/20/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2496-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to Agreement of
Cotenancy (RS 139) to be effective 7/31/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/30/19.
    Accession Number: 20190730-5099.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/20/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2497-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-07-30 Real-Time
Neutrality Settlement Amendment to be effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/30/19.
    Accession Number: 20190730-5100.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/20/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2498-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-07-31_SA 3152 Polaris
Wind Energy-METC 1st Rev GIA (J533) to be effective 7/17/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/31/19.
    Accession Number: 20190731-5022.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/21/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2499-000.
    Applicants: Tuscola Wind II, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Reactive Power Compensation
Filing to be effective 9/29/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/31/19.
    Accession Number: 20190731-5047.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/21/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2500-000.
    Applicants: Pheasant Run Wind, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Reactive Power Compensation
Filing to be effective 9/29/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/31/19.
    Accession Number: 20190731-5048.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/21/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2501-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 3126R4 WAPA NITSA and NOA to
be effective 7/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/31/19.
    Accession Number: 20190731-5056.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/21/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2502-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Wiregrass LGIA Filing to be
effective 7/17/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/31/19.
    Accession Number: 20190731-5077.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/21/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2503-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SCE Revised TO Tariff
Appendix X to be effective 7/26/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/31/19.
    Accession Number: 20190731-5084.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/21/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2504-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SCE Revised WDAT Attachment
J to be effective 7/26/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/31/19.
    Accession Number: 20190731-5085.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/21/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2505-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: WDAT Energy Storage to be
effective 9/30/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/31/19.
    Accession Number: 20190731-5101.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/21/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2506-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Q2 2019 Quarterly Filing of
City and County of San Francisco's WDT SA (SA 275) to be effective 6/
30/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/31/19.
    Accession Number: 20190731-5115.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/21/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2507-000.
    Applicants: Convergent Energy and Power LP.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Normal filing 2019 to be
effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/31/19.
    Accession Number: 20190731-5116.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/21/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2508-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 3215R6 People's Electric
Cooperative NITSA NOA to be effective 7/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/31/19.
    Accession Number: 20190731-5121.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/21/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2509-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 3563 ETEC, MISO and Entergy
Services Attachment AO to be effective 7/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/31/19.
    Accession Number: 20190731-5130.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/21/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2510-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of Colorado.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: PSCo-Multi-CFA-350-Exh I & L
0.1.0-Exh N 0.0.0 to be effective 9/30/2019.
    Filed Date: 7/31/19.
    Accession Number: 20190731-5143.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/21/19.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES19-47-000.
    Applicants: Consumers Energy Company.
    Description: Application under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act
for Authorization to Issue Securities of Consumers Energy Company.
    Filed Date: 7/30/19.
    Accession Number: 20190730-5124.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/20/19.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following qualifying
facility filings:

    Docket Numbers: QF19-1431-000.
    Applicants: Milton Regional Sewer Authority.
    Description: Form 556 of Milton Regional Sewer Authority.
    Filed Date: 7/31/19.
    Accession Number: 20190731-5032.
    Comments Due: Non-Applicable.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's

Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but
intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 31, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-16726 Filed 8-5-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P