[Federal Register: December 1, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 231)]
[Notices]
[Page 72789-72792]
[DOCID:fr01de08-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PF08-24-000]

Calais LNG Project Company, LLC; Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for the Calais LNG Project, Request for
Comments on Environmental Issues, and Notice of Public Scoping Meeting

November 20, 2008.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) is in
the process of evaluating the Calais LNG Project planned by Calais LNG
Project Company, LLC (Calais). The project would consist of an onshore
liquefied natural gas (LNG) import and storage terminal in Washington
County, Maine, and about 20.5 miles natural gas sendout pipeline.
    As a part of this evaluation, FERC staff will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS) that will address the
environmental impacts of the project. In cooperation with the FERC
staff, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Coast Guard
(Coast Guard) will assess the maritime safety and security of the
project. This Notice of Intent (NOI) announces the opening of the
scoping process the Commission will use to gather input from the public
and interested agencies on the planned project. Your input will help
determine which issues need to be evaluated in the EIS. Please note
that the scoping period will close on December 22, 2008.
    Comments regarding this project may be submitted in written form or
verbally. Further details on how to submit written comments are
provided in the Public Participation section of this NOI. In lieu of or
in addition to sending written comments, we invite you to attend the
public scoping meeting scheduled as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Date and time                           Location
------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 4, 2008, 6 p.m................  Washington County Community
                                          College--Auditorium, One
                                          College Drive, Calais, ME
                                          04619,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission will use the EIS in its decision-making process to
determine whether to authorize the project. The Coast Guard will assess
the safety and security of the Calais LNG Project and issue a Letter of
Recommendation. As described above, the FERC staff will hold a public
scoping meeting to allow the public to provide input on these
assessments. This NOI explains the scoping process that we \1\ will use
to gather information on the project from the public and interested
agencies, and summarizes the process that the Coast Guard will use.
Your input will help identify the issues that need to be evaluated in
the EIS and in the Coast Guard's safety and security assessment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ ``We,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the environmental staff
of the FERC's Office of Energy Projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The public scoping meeting listed above will be combined with the
Coast Guard's public meeting regarding the maritime safety and security
of the project. At the meeting, the Coast Guard will discuss: (1) The
waterway suitability assessment that it will conduct to determine
whether the waterway can safely accommodate the LNG vessel traffic and
operation of the planned LNG marine terminal; and (2) the security
assessment it will conduct in accordance with the requirements of the
Maritime Transportation Security Act. The Coast Guard will not be
issuing a separate meeting notice for the maritime safety and security
aspects of the project.
    The FERC will be the lead federal agency for the preparation of the
EIS. The Coast Guard and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) will
serve as cooperating agencies during preparation of the EIS. The
document will satisfy the requirements of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). In addition, with this NOI, we are asking
other Federal, State, and local agencies with jurisdiction and/or
special expertise with respect to environmental issues to cooperate
with us in the preparation of the EIS. These agencies may choose to
participate once they have evaluated Calais's proposal relative to
their responsibilities. Agencies that would like to request cooperating
status should follow the instructions for filing comments described
later in this NOI. Consultations have already been initiated with the
Corps, and other State and/or Federal agencies. Consultations with
these and other agencies will continue throughout the project review
and permitting period. Corps staff will be in attendance at the scoping
meeting.
    This NOI is being sent to Federal, State, and local government
agencies; elected officials; Canadian officials and agencies; affected
landowners; environmental and public interest groups; Indian tribes and
regional Native American organizations; other interested parties; and
local libraries and newspapers. We encourage government representatives
to notify their constituents of this planned

project and encourage them to comment on their areas of concern.
    If you are a landowner affected by the sendout pipeline receiving
this NOI, you may be contacted by a Calais representative about the
acquisition of an easement to construct, operate, and maintain the
planned project facilities. The pipeline company would seek to
negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement. However, if the project is
approved by the FERC, that approval conveys with it the right of
eminent domain for the sendout pipeline. Therefore, if easement
negotiations fail to produce an agreement, the pipeline company could
initiate condemnation proceedings in accordance with federal or state
law.
    A fact sheet prepared by the FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural
Gas Facility On My Land? What Do I Need To Know?'' addresses a number
of typically asked questions, including the use of eminent domain and
how to participate in the Commission's proceedings. It is available for
viewing on the FERC Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov).

Summary of the Planned Project

    Calais plans to construct and operate an LNG import terminal and
storage facility, and associated natural gas sendout pipeline with a
nominal capacity of 1.0 billion standard cubic feet of natural gas per
day. The terminal would be located just north of Ford Point,
approximately 6 miles southeast of the downtown area of the Town of
Calais, on the St. Croix River, in Washington County, Maine.
    More specifically, the facilities would consist of:
     A single berth marine LNG terminal, comprising breasting
dolphins and mooring dolphins, and an unloading platform affixed to a
pier about 1,000 feet long to accommodate LNG vessels ranging in cargo
capacity from 120,000 to 170,000 cubic meters (m\3\);
     Three cargo unloading arms and one vapor return arm on the
pier, with an unloading capacity rate of 12,000 m\3\ of LNG per hour;
     Two full-containment LNG storage tanks, each having a
capacity of 160,000 m\3\;
     Boil-off gas and vapor handling system, and sendout pumps;
     LNG vaporization system to re-vaporize LNG to natural gas;
     Emergency generator and separate uninterruptible power
supply system;
     Ancillary terminal facilities, including control building,
maintenance building, warehouse, administration building, instrument
air shed, electrical buildings, compressor building, marine electrical
building/switch room, fire/water pump house, and gate house/security
center;
     A sendout meter to provide custody transfer measurement to
the pipeline;
     About 20.5 miles of 36-inch-diameter sendout pipeline,
extending from the planned LNG terminal to the existing Maritimes &
Northeast Pipeline, LLC pipeline system in Princeton, Maine; and
     A hazard monitoring system incorporating combustible gas
detectors, low temperature detectors, smoke detectors, and three levels
of shut-down controls.
    A location map depicting the planned facilities, including its
preferred pipeline route and three pipeline alternatives, is attached
to this NOI as appendix 1. \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being
printed in the Federal Register. Copies are available on the
Commission's Web site (excluding maps) at the ``e-Library'' link or
from the Commission's Public Reference Room or call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
For instructions on connecting to e-Library refer to the end of this
notice. Copies of the appendices were sent to all those receiving
this notice in the mail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The EIS Process

    The NEPA requires the Commission to take into account the
environmental impacts that could result from an action when it
considers whether or not to approve an LNG import terminal or an
interstate natural gas pipeline. The FERC will use the EIS to consider
the environmental impacts that could result if it issues project
authorizations to Calais under sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
The NEPA also requires us to discover and address concerns the public
may have about proposals. This process is referred to as ``scoping.''
The main goal of the scoping process is to focus the analysis in the
EIS on the important environmental issues. With this NOI, we are
requesting public comments on the scope of the issues to be addressed
in the EIS. All comments received will be considered during preparation
of the EIS.
    In the EIS we will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of
the construction, operation, maintenance, and abandonment of the
planned project under these general headings:
     Geology and Soils.
     Water Resources.
     Aquatic Resources.
     Vegetation and Wildlife.
     Threatened and Endangered Species.
     Land Use, Recreation, and Visual Resources.
     Cultural Resources.
     Socioeconomics.
     Marine Transportation.
     Air Quality and Noise.
     Reliability and Safety.
     Cumulative Impacts.
    In the EIS, we will also evaluate possible alternatives to the
planned project or portions of the project, and make recommendations on
how to lessen or avoid impacts on affected resources.
    Our independent analysis of the issues will be included in a draft
EIS. The draft EIS will be mailed to federal, state, and local
government agencies; elected officials; Canadian officials and
agencies; affected landowners; environmental and public interest
groups; Indian tribes and regional Native American organizations;
commentors; other interested parties; local libraries and newspapers;
and the FERC's official service list for this proceeding. A 45-day
comment period will be allotted for review of the draft EIS. We will
consider all comments on the draft EIS and revise the document, as
necessary, before issuing a final EIS. We will consider all comments on
the final EIS before we make our recommendations to the Commission. To
ensure that your comments are considered, please follow the
instructions in the Public Participation section of this NOI.
    Although no formal application has been filed, the FERC staff has
already initiated its NEPA review under its Pre-Filing Process. The
purpose of the Pre-Filing Process is to encourage early involvement of
interested stakeholders and to identify and resolve issues before an
application is filed with the FERC. In addition, the Coast Guard, as a
cooperating agency under NEPA, has initiated its review of the project
as well.

Coast Guard Letter of Recommendation Process

    The Coast Guard is responsible for matters related to navigation
safety, vessel engineering and safety standards, and all matters
pertaining to the safety of facilities or equipment located in or
adjacent to navigable waters up to the last valve immediately before
the receiving tanks. The Coast Guard also has authority for LNG
facility security plan review, approval, and compliance verification as
provided in title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations 105 (33 CFR
part 105), and as it pertains to the management of vessel traffic in
and around the LNG facility.
    Upon receipt of a letter of intent from an owner or operator
intending to build a new LNG facility, the Coast Guard Captain of the
Port (COTP) conducts an

analysis that results in a Letter of Recommendation issued to the owner
or operator and to the state and local governments having jurisdiction,
addressing the suitability of the waterway to accommodate LNG vessels.
Specifically the Letter of Recommendation addresses the suitability of
the waterway based on:
     The physical location and a description of the facility
arrangements;
     the LNG vessels' characteristics and the frequency of LNG
shipments to the facility;
     charts showing waterway channels and identifying
commercial, industrial, environmentally sensitive, and residential area
in and adjacent to the waterway used by the LNG vessels en route to the
facility (within 25 kilometers [15.5 miles] of the facility);
     density and character of the marine traffic in the
waterway;
     locks, bridges, or other manmade obstructions in the
waterway;
     depth of water;
     tidal range;
     natural hazards, including reef, rocks, and sandbars;
     underwater pipelines and cables; and
     distance of berthed vessels from the channel, and the
width of the channel.
    In addition, the Coast Guard will review and approve the facility's
operations manual and emergency response plan (33 CFR 127.019), as well
as the facility's security plan (33 CFR 105.410). The Coast Guard will
also provide input to other federal, state, and local government
agencies reviewing the project. Other agencies that must approve the
project are the Corps, Maine Department of Environmental Protection,
and the Maine Bureau of Parks and Lands.
    In order to complete a thorough waterway suitability analysis and
fulfill the regulatory mandates cited above, the COTP Sector Northern
New England will be conducting a formal risk assessment evaluating the
various safety and security aspects associated with the Calais LNG
Project. This risk assessment will be accomplished through a series of
workshops focusing on the areas of waterways safety, port security, and
consequence management, with involvement from a broad cross-section of
government and port stakeholders with expertise in each of the
respective areas. The workshops will be by invitation only; however,
comments received during the public comment period will be considered
as input in the risk assessment process.

Currently Identified Environmental Issues

    We have already identified issues that we think deserve attention
based on a preliminary review of the project area and the planned
facility information provided by Calais. This preliminary list of
issues, which is presented below, may be revised based on your comments
and our continuing analyses.
     Impact of LNG vessel traffic on other Passamaquoddy Bay
and St. Croix River users, including fishing and recreational boaters.
     Safety and security issues relating to LNG vessel traffic,
including transit through Head Harbor Passage and Western Passage of
Passamaquoddy Bay, and the St. Croix River.
     Potential impacts on residents in the project area,
including safety issues at the import and storage facility, noise, air
quality, and visual resources.
     Project impacts on the Moosehorn National Wildlife Refuge
and Saint Croix Island International Park.
     Project impacts on wetlands, vegetation, threatened and
endangered species, and wildlife habitat.
     Project impacts on cultural resources.

Public Participation

    You can make a difference by providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about the planned project. By becoming a
commentor, your concerns will be addressed in the EIS and considered by
the Commission. Your comments should focus on the potential
environmental effects, reasonable alternatives (including alternative
facility sites and pipeline routes), and measures to avoid or lessen
environmental impacts. The more specific your comments, the more useful
they will be. To ensure that your comments are timely and properly
recorded, please send in your comments so that they will be received in
Washington, DC on or before December 22, 2008.
    For your convenience, there are three methods which you can use to
submit your comments to the Commission. In all instances please
reference the project docket number with your submission. The docket
number can be found on the front of this NOI. The Commission encourages
electronic filing of comments and has dedicated eFiling expert staff
available to assist you at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (1) You may file your comments electronically by using the Quick
Comment feature, which is located on the Commission's Internet Web site
at http://www.ferc.gov under the link to Documents and Filings. A Quick
Comment is an easy method for interested persons to submit text-only
comments on a project.
    (2) You may file your comments electronically by using the eFiling
feature, which is located on the Commission's Internet Web site at
http://www.ferc.gov under the link to Documents and Filings. eFiling
involves preparing your submission in the same manner as you would if
filing on paper, and then saving the file on your computer's hard
drive. You will attach that file as your submission. New eFiling users
must first create an account by clicking on ``Sign up'' or
``eRegister.'' You will be asked to select the type of filing you are
making. A comment on a particular project is considered a ``Comment on
a Filing.''
    (3) You may file your comments via mail to the Commission by
sending an original and two copies of your letter to: Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.
     Label one copy of the comments for the attention of Gas
Branch 1, PJ-11.1.
     Reference Docket No. PF08-24-000 on the original and both
copies.
    The public scoping meeting (date, time, and location listed above)
is designed to provide another opportunity to offer comments on the
planned project. Interested groups and individuals are encouraged to
attend the meeting and to present comments on the safety, security, and
environmental issues that they believe should be addressed in the EIS.
A transcript of the meeting will be generated so that your comments
will be accurately recorded.

Environmental Mailing List

    If you wish to remain on the environmental mailing list, please
return the attached Mailing List Form (appendix 2). Also, indicate on
the form your preference for receiving a paper version in lieu of an
electronic version of the EIS on CD-ROM. If you do not return this form
or provide comments, we will remove your name from our mailing list.

Additional Information

    Once Calais formally files its application with the Commission, you
may want to become an ``intervenor,'' which is an official party to the
proceeding. Intervenors play a more formal role in the process and are
able to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be heard by the courts if
they choose to appeal the Commission's final ruling. An intervenor
formally participates in a

Commission proceeding by filing a request to intervene. Instructions
for becoming an intervenor are included in the User's Guide under the
``e-filing'' link on the Commission's Web site. Please note that you
may not request intervenor status at this time. You must wait until a
formal application is filed with the Commission.
    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at 1-866-208-FERC (3372) or on
the FERC Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) using the ``eLibrary
link.'' Click on the eLibrary link, select ``General Search'' and enter
the project docket number excluding the last three digits (i.e., PF08-
24) in the ``Docket Number'' field. Be sure you have selected an
appropriate date range. For assistance with eLibrary, the eLibrary
helpline can be reached at 1-866-208-3676, TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by e-
mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The eLibrary link on the FERC
Internet Web site also provides access to the texts of formal documents
issued by the Commission, such as orders, notices, and rule makings.
    In addition, the FERC offers a free service called eSubscription
that allows you to keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in
specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time you spend
researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. To register for this service, go to http://www.ferc.gov/
esubscribenow.htm.
    Public meetings or site visits will be posted on the Commission's
calendar located at http://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx
along with other related information.
    Finally, Calais has established an Internet Web site for this
project at http://www.calaislng.com. The Web site includes a project
overview, status, potential impacts and mitigation, and answers to
frequently asked questions. You can also request additional information
by calling Calais directly at<PHONE_NUMBER> or visiting the Calais
Office at 421 Main Street, Calais, ME.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-28306 Filed 11-28-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: August 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 159)]
[Notices]
[Page 51140-51142]
[DOCID:fr18au10-169]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-62709; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2010-097]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change by The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
To Amend Exchange Rules Related to the Cut-off Time for Contrary
Exercise Advice Submissions

August 12, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on August 3, 2010, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II, below, which
Items have been prepared by NASDAQ. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    NASDAQ is filing with the Commission a proposal for the NASDAQ
Options Market (``NOM'' or ``Exchange'') to amend Chapter VIII, Section
1 (Exercise of Options Contracts) to make changes to extend the cut-off
time to submit contrary exercise advices (``Contrary Exercise Advices''
or ``CEAs'').\3\ The Exchange also proposes to make certain non-
substantive changes to reorganize the text of Chapter VIII, Section 1
to more clearly present the existing requirements and to eliminate
duplicative language.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Contrary Exercise Advices are also referred to as Expiring
Exercise Declarations (``EED'') in the rules of The Options Clearing
Corporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on NASDAQ's Web
site at http:[sol][sol]nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/Filings/, at NASDAQ's
principal office, on the Commission's Web site at
http:[sol][sol]www.sec.gov, and at the Commission's Public Reference
Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NASDAQ included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. NASDAQ has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposal is to make changes to Chapter VIII,
Section 1 to extend the cut-off time to submit Contrary Exercise
Advices to the Exchange; to extend exercise cut-off deadlines to
Quarterly Options Series; and to make certain non-substantive changes
to reorganize the text of Section 1 to more clearly present the
existing requirements and to eliminate duplicative language.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange proposes to reorganize the current rule text of
Chapter VIII, Section 1 so that the requirement that exercise
decisions must be made by 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time is specified in
paragraph (c), while the requirements pertaining to submitting CEA
instructions are contained in new paragraph (d). The language in new
paragraph (d) is comprised of language moved from paragraph (b)(ii)
and paragraph (c) of the current rule. The Exchange also proposes to
eliminate Supplementary Material .03 to Chapter VIII, Section 1
because it is duplicative of certain language contained in paragraph
(c) of the current rule and paragraph (d) in the proposal.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background
    The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') has an established
procedure, under OCC Rule 805, that provides for the automatic exercise
of certain options that are in-the-money by a specified amount known as
``Exercise-by-Exception'' or ``Ex-by-Ex.'' Under the Ex-by-Ex process,
options holders holding option contracts that are in-the-money by a
requisite amount and who wish to have their contracts automatically
exercised need take no further action. However, under OCC Rule 805,
option holders who do not want their options automatically exercised or
who want their options to be exercised under different parameters than
that of the Ex-by-Ex procedures must instruct OCC of their ``contrary
intention.''
    In addition to and separately from the OCC requirement, under
Chapter VIII, Section 1 option holders must file a CEA with the
Exchange notifying it of the contrary intention.\5\ Chapter VIII,
Section 1 is designed, in part, to deter individuals from taking
improper advantage of late breaking news by requiring evidence of an
option holder's timely decision to exercise or not exercise expiring
equity options. Participants satisfy this evidentiary requirement by
submitting a CEA form to the Exchange, or by electronically submitting
the CEA through OCC's electronic communications system. The submission
of the CEA allows the Exchange to satisfy its regulatory obligation to
verify that the decision to make a contrary exercise was made timely
and in accordance with Chapter VIII, Section 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Referenced submissions of CEAs to OCC are through
Participants' clearing firms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently under Chapter VIII, Section 1, option holders have until
5:30 p.m.\6\ on the day prior to expiration to make a final decision to
exercise or not exercise an expiring option that would otherwise either
expire or be automatically exercised. An Exchange Participant may not
accept CEA instructions from its customer or non customer accounts
after 5:30 p.m. However, the current rule gives Participants an
additional one hour, up to 6:30 p.m., to submit these CEA instructions
where such Participants use an electronic submission process.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Referenced times are to Eastern Standard Time (EST).
    \7\ Chapter VIII, Section 1 indicates that if Participants do
not employ an electronic submission procedure, they are required to
submit CEAs for non-customer accounts by the 5:30 p.m. deadline.
This deadline for manual submission is required in order to prevent
improperly extending the 5:30 p.m. deadline to exercise or not
exercise an option. This requirement is based on the difficulty in
monitoring a manual procedure that has different times for deciding
whether or not to exercise the option and for the submission of the
CEA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This current process allowing exchange members an additional one
hour after the decision making cut off time of 5:30 p.m. to submit a
CEA to the various options exchanges was approved by the Commission in
2003 for the existing options exchanges; \8\ and was approved in 2008
for NASDAQ in respect of Participants.\9\ When initially approved in
2003, the Ex-by-Ex thresholds were $0.75 for customers and $0.25 for
broker-dealer accounts. In 2009, the Ex-by-Ex threshold was $0.01 for
all accounts. This decrease in the Ex-by-Ex threshold, coupled with the
dramatic increase in option trading volume from 2003 to 2009, has led
to a larger number of CEA instructions and has increased the burden on
firms to process and submit instructions timely.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 47885 (May 16,
2003), 68 FR 28309 (May 23, 2003) (SR-Amex-2001-92); 48505
(September 17, 2003), 68 FR 55680 (September 26, 2003) (SR-ISE-2003-
20); 48640 (October 16, 2003), 68 FR 60757 (October 23, 2003) (SR-
PCX-2003-47); and 48639 (October 16, 2003), 68 FR 60764 (October 23,
2003) (SR-Phlx-2003-65).
    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57478 (May 12,
2008), 73 FR 14521 (March 18, 2008) (SR-NASDAQ-2007-004 and SR-
NASDAQ-2007-080).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Proposals
    The Exchange proposes to extend the current 6:30 p.m. deadline in
Chapter VIII, Section 1 for submitting CEA instructions to the Exchange
by one additional hour, up to 7:30 p.m.\10\ The Exchange believes that
this proposed rule change is necessary to address concerns expressed by
members (Participants) that, given the decrease in the Ex-by-Ex
threshold and the increase in trading, the existing deadline for
submitting CEAs to the Exchange is problematic for timely back-office
processing. The proposed additional one hour will address this concern
by further enabling firms to more timely manage, process, and submit
the instructions to the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ To clarify Chapter VIII, Section 1 so that it is similar to
CEA rules of other options exchanges, such as ISE Rule 1100, the
Exchange proposes to incorporate in Section 1 the concept that
instructions are submitted to the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to modify the language in paragraph (g)
of the current rule (new paragraph (h)), which allows a Participant up
to 2 hours and 30 minutes to submit a CEA to the Exchange in the event
of a modified close of trading on the day of expiration, by removing
the two hour and thirty minute restriction and allowing a Participant
to submit a CEA to the Exchange in the event of a modified close of
trading of up to the proposed 7:30 p.m. deadline. This will make
consistent the submission deadline for both regular and modified close
expiration days. Moreover, this will provide uniformity with submission
deadlines for both regular and modified close expiration days which
will remove any possibility for error when determining what the
submission deadline is on any modified close expiration day.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ CEA procedures in respect of index options are discussed
separately in Chapter VIII, Section 1(k) (new paragraph (l)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is important to note that this proposed submission deadline does
not change the substantive requirement that option holders make a final
decision by 5:30 p.m. The Exchange will continue to enforce the 5:30
p.m. decision making requirement, while also allowing additional time
to process and submit the CEA instructions. This proposal seeks to
increase that additional submission time by one hour, and the Exchange
believes that this proposal will be beneficial to the marketplace,
particularly as it concerns back-office processing. This proposed
additional processing time and submission deadline will not conflict
with OCC submission rules or cause any OCC processing issues. The
initiative to address Exchange member (Participant) concerns is
industry-wide, and the Exchange anticipates that other options
exchanges will also propose a one hour extension for which they will
accept a CEA.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The Commission approved a rule change proposal of the
International Stock Exchange LLC (``ISE'') related to extension of
the cutoff time for CEA submissions. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 61710 (March 15, 2010), 75 FR 13636 (March 22, 2010)
(SR-ISE-2010-02) (order approving). The Exchange's rule change
proposal is based on SR-ISE-2010-02, and the Exchange believes that
other options exchanges will submit similar filings to the
Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to impose the same cutoff deadlines in
Chapter VIII, Section 1(c) to QOS as to non-QOS (e.g. equity) options.
QOS are listed and traded on the Exchange pursuant to Chapter XIV,
Section 11 (Terms of Index Options Contracts). The proposed change
reflects the applicability of CEA cut-off deadlines to QOS options and
conforms Chapter VIII, Section 1 with Chapter XIV, Section 11 of the
Exchange's rules and with the CEA rules of other options exchanges.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See, e.g., ISE Rule 1100(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange also proposes non-substantive, housekeeping
changes

such as clarifying the name of The Options Clearing Corporation in
Chapter VIII, Section 1(b).
    The Exchange recognizes that the industry-wide scope of the
Exchange's rule change proposal and other similar proposals will
require coordinated effectiveness of the expansion to 7:30 p.m. If the
operative date of this proposed rule change is more than five business
days prior to the date of the next expiration Friday, i.e. the third
Friday of the month (``Expiration Friday''),\14\ the Exchange will
implement its proposed rule change so as to be effective for that
Expiration Friday. If the operative date of this proposed rule change
is five business days or less prior to the date of the next Expiration
Friday, the Exchange will implement the rule change so as to be
effective for the following Expiration Friday. The Exchange will notify
its Participants of the implementation date of the rule change via an
Options Regulatory Alert (``ORA'') or Options Trader Alert (``OTA'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ For example, Expiration Friday for August 2010 options will
be August 20, 2010, and Expiration Friday for September options will
be September 17, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \15\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \16\ in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of
a free and open market and a national market system. This proposed rule
change will foster coordination with back office personnel engaged in
processing information and is consistent with the facilitating of
transactions in securities as set forth in Section 6(b)(5), by
providing Exchange Participants an additional hour within which to
complete the necessary processing of CEAs and thereby decreasing
Exchange Participants' burden of processing an increasing number of
contrary exercise advices and enabling them to more easily manage and
process these instructions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    NASDAQ does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments Regarding the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \17\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-097 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-097. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
publicly available. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NASDAQ-2010-097 and should be submitted on or before September 8, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-20472 Filed 8-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 93 (Monday, May 17, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26651-26654]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10310]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2020-1038; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-00569-E;
Amendment 39-21496; AD 2021-08-02]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A. (Type
Certificate Previously Held by Turbomeca, S.A.) Turboshaft Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A. (Safran) Arriel 2D and Arriel 2E model
turboshaft engines. This AD was prompted by the manufacturer revising
the maintenance and overhaul manuals to introduce new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations and maintenance tasks. This AD
requires the replacement of certain critical parts before reaching
their published in-service life limits, performing scheduled

maintenance tasks before reaching their published periodicity, and
performing unscheduled maintenance tasks when the engine meets certain
conditions. As a terminating action, this AD requires operators to
revise the airworthiness limitation section (ALS) of their existing
approved aircraft maintenance program (AMP) by incorporating the
revised airworthiness limitations and maintenance tasks. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective June 21, 2021.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of June 21,
2021.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A., 64511 Bordes--Cedex, France;
phone: (33) 05 59 74 40 00; fax: (33) 05 59 74 45 15. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(781) 238-7759. It is also available at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-1038.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-1038; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, the
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments
received, and other information. The address for Docket Operations is
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wego Wang, Aviation Safety Engineer,
ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:
(781) 238-7134; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Safran Arriel 2D
and Arriel 2E model turboshaft engines. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on November 30, 2020 (85 FR 76492). The NPRM was
prompted by the manufacturer revising the maintenance and overhaul
manuals to introduce new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations
and maintenance tasks. In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require the
replacement of certain critical parts before reaching their published
in-service life limits, performing scheduled maintenance tasks before
reaching their published periodicity, and performing unscheduled
maintenance tasks when the engine meets certain conditions specified in
the applicable Safran Arriel maintenance manual (MM) chapter. As a
terminating action, the NPRM proposed to require operators to revise
the ALS of their existing approved AMP by incorporating the revised
airworthiness limitations and maintenance tasks. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
    The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the
Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has
issued EASA AD 2018-0273, dated December 13, 2018 (referred to after
this as ``the MCAI''), to address the unsafe condition on these
products. The MCAI states:

    The airworthiness limitations and maintenance tasks for the
SAFRAN ARRIEL 2D, ARRIEL 2E and ARRIEL 2N engines, which are
approved by EASA, are currently defined and published in the SAFRAN
ARRIEL 2 Maintenance and Overhaul Manuals, as applicable. These
instructions have been identified as mandatory for continued
airworthiness.
    Failure to accomplish these instructions could result in an
unsafe condition.
    SAFRAN recently revised the applicable Maintenance and Overhaul
Manuals (the applicable ALS), introducing new and/or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations and maintenance tasks.
    For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD requires
accomplishment of the actions specified in the applicable ALS.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2020-1038.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the costs.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety
requires adopting this AD as proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. Except for
minor editorial changes, this AD is adopted as proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Section 05-10-00, Airworthiness Limitations, of
Chapter 05, Airworthiness Limitations--Frequencies--Inspections, of the
Safran Helicopter Engines ARRIEL 2D Maintenance Manual, Volume 1, No. X
292 R1 450 2, Update No. 20, dated June 15, 2020. Safran Helicopter
Engines ARRIEL 2D Maintenance Manual No. X292 R1 450 2 identifies the
terms used in tables for limits and mandatory maintenance tasks, usage
counters of the engine log book, life limits for life-limited parts,
and mandatory inspection tasks to be carried out to reach the
airworthiness objectives on Safran Arriel 2D model engines.
    The FAA reviewed Section 05-10-00, Airworthiness Limitations, of
Chapter 05, Airworthiness Limitations--Frequencies--Inspections, of the
Safran Helicopter Engines ARRIEL 2E Maintenance Manual No. X 292 R2 300
2, Update No. 16, dated June 15, 2020. Safran Helicopter Engines ARRIEL
2E Maintenance Manual No. X292 R2 300 2 identifies the terms used in
tables for limits and mandatory maintenance tasks, usage counters of
the engine log book, life limits for life-limited parts, and mandatory
inspection tasks to be carried out to reach the airworthiness
objectives on Safran Arriel 2E model engines.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in ADDRESSES.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 426 engines installed on
helicopters of U.S. registry.
    The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remove and replace critical parts.....  12 work-hours x $85 per           $1,152          $2,172        $925,272
                                         hour = $1,020.
Perform maintenance tasks.............  1 work-hour x $85 per              1,152           1,237         526,962
                                         hour = $85.
Revise the ALS and AMP................  1 work-hour x $85 per                  0              85          36,210
                                         hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary
corrective actions that would be required based on the results of the
mandated maintenance tasks. The agency has no way of determining the
number of aircraft that might need these actions.

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                    Action                                 Labor cost               Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Perform corrective action.....................  1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85              $0             $85
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2021-08-02 Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A. (Type Certificate
previously held by Turbomeca, S.A.): Amendment 39-21496; Docket No.
FAA-2020-1038; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-00569-E.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective June 21, 2021.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A. (Safran)
(Type Certificate previously held by Turbomeca, S.A.) Arriel 2D and
Arriel 2E model turboshaft engines.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7250, Turbine
Section.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by the manufacturer revising the
maintenance and overhaul manuals to introduce new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations and maintenance tasks. The FAA
is issuing this AD to prevent failure of the engine. The unsafe
condition, if not addressed, could result in uncontained release of
a critical part, damage to the engine, and damage to the helicopter.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    (1) Replace each critical part before reaching the in-service
life limits specified in paragraph 1.C., ``Table of authorized in-
service life limits for the ARRIEL 2D,'' or ``Table of authorized
in-service life limits for the ARRIEL 2E,'' Chapter 05-10-00 of the
Safran ARRIEL Maintenance Manual (MM) for that engine.
    (2) Before reaching the periodicity specified in paragraph 1.,
``Tables of Mandatory Maintenance Tasks,'' table D., ``Scheduled
inspection,'' Chapter 05-10-00 of the Safran ARRIEL MM for that
engine, perform all maintenance tasks specified in table D.
    (3) When the engine meets the conditions specified in paragraph
1., ``Tables of Mandatory Maintenance Tasks,'' table E.,
``Unscheduled inspection,'' Chapter 05-10-00 of the Safran ARRIEL MM
for that engine, perform the maintenance tasks specified in table E.
    (4) If, during performance of the maintenance tasks required by
paragraph (g)(2) or (3) of this AD, a discrepancy is found, as
defined in the applicable airworthiness limitation section (ALS),
perform the corrective actions specified in paragraph 1., ``Tables
of Mandatory Maintenance Tasks,'' table D., ``Scheduled
inspection,'' or table E. ``Unscheduled inspection,'' Chapter 05-10-
00 of the Safran ARRIEL MM for the engine.
    (5) If no compliance time is identified in Chapter 05-10-00 of
the Safran ARRIEL MM, perform the corrective action before further
flight.

(h) Exception to Paragraphs (g)(2) and (3)

    Where the applicable Safran ARRIEL MM chapters provide
instructions to send the Module 03 to a Safran Helicopter Engines-
approved repair center, the operator may choose to send the Module
03 to any FAA-approved repair center capable of performing the
required actions.

(i) Mandatory Terminating Action

    As terminating action to the requirements in paragraph (g) of
this AD, within 365 days after the effective date of this AD, revise
the ALS of the existing approved aircraft maintenance program (AMP)
by incorporating:
    (i) Task 05-10-00-150-801-A01, ``Airworthiness Limitations--
General,'' from the applicable Safran ARRIEL MM chapter.
    (ii) Task 05-10-00-200-801-A01, ``Airworthiness Limitations--
Authorized In-Service Life Limits,'' from the applicable Safran
ARRIEL MM chapter.
    (iii) Task 05-10-10-200-801-A01, ``Airworthiness Limitations--
Tables of Mandatory Maintenance Tasks,'' from the applicable Safran
ARRIEL MM chapter.

(j) Definitions

    (1) For the purpose of this AD, a ``critical part'' is a part
identified in paragraph 1.C., ``Table of authorized in-service life
limits for the ARRIEL 2D,'' or ``Table of authorized in-service life
limits for the ARRIEL 2E,'' Chapter 05-10-00 of the Safran ARRIEL MM
for that engine.
    (2) For the purpose of this AD, the ``Chapter 05-10-00 of the
Safran ARRIEL MM'' is:
    (i) Chapter 05-10-00 of Safran Aircraft Engines ARRIEL 2D MM No.
X292 R1 450 2, Update No. 20, dated June 15, 2020; or
    (ii) Chapter 05-10-00 of Safran Aircraft Engines ARRIEL 2E MM
No. X292 R2 300 2, Update No. 16, dated June 15, 2020.
    (3) For the purpose of this AD, the ``approved maintenance
program'' is defined as the basis for which the operator ensures the
continuing airworthiness of each operated helicopter.

(k) Credit for Previous Actions

    (1) For affected Safran Arriel 2D model turboshaft engines, you
may take credit for revising the ALS of the existing approved AMP
that is required by paragraph (i) of this AD if you incorporated the
tasks before the effective date of this AD using Chapter 05-10-00 of
Safran ARRIEL 2D MM No. X292 R1 450 2, Update No. 19, dated December
30, 2019.
    (2) For affected Safran Arriel 2E model turboshaft engines, you
may take credit for revising the ALS of the existing approved AMP
that is required by paragraph (i) of this AD if you incorporated the
tasks before the effective date of this AD using Chapter 05-10-00 of
Safran ARRIEL 2E MM No. X292 R2 300 2, Update No. 15, dated December
30, 2019.

(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in Related Information. You may email your request to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(m) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Wego Wang,
Aviation Safety Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Refer to European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2018-0273, dated December 13, 2018, for more information. You may
examine the EASA AD in the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating it in Docket No. FAA-2020-1038.

(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Section 05-10-00, Airworthiness Limitations, of Chapter 05,
Airworthiness Limitations--Frequencies--Inspections, of the Safran
Helicopter Engines ARRIEL 2D Maintenance Manual, Volume 1, No. X 292
R1 450 2, Update No. 20, dated June 15, 2020.
    (ii) Section 05-10-00, Airworthiness Limitations, of Chapter 05,
Airworthiness Limitations--Frequencies--Inspections, of the Safran
Helicopter Engines ARRIEL 2E Maintenance Manual, Volume 1, No. X 292
R2 300 2, Update No. 16, dated June 15, 2020.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A., 64511 Bordes--Cedex, France; phone:
(33) 05 59 74 40 00; fax: (33) 05 59 74 45 15.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on May 11, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-10310 Filed 5-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


From:        James Taylor <  HYPERLINK<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>>

To:        John Bradfield/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Bill Schrock/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date:        02/27/2012 10:57 AM

Subject:        Re: NEI Updates for MWV ?

John, here are the two updates.

For the NEI759 I left the autofilter on, so you could see the change to delete a compound from one source.

For the NEI6450, the changes are highlighted for the changed locations and parameters, but they are in the revised columns so it should upload ok.

Thanks

Jim Taylor

MWV, Shared Business Support

Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>

Cell:<PHONE_NUMBER>


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 239 (Thursday, December 12, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67944-67945]
[FR Doc No: 2019-26735]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-0417]

Request for Nominations on the National Mammography Quality
Assurance Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting that any
industry organizations interested in participating in the selection of
nonvoting industry representatives to serve on the National Mammography
Quality Assurance Advisory Committee in the Center for Devices and
Radiological Health notify FDA in writing. FDA is also requesting
nominations for a nonvoting industry representative to serve on the
National Mammography Quality Assurance Advisory Committee. A nominee
may either be self-nominated or nominated by an organization to serve
as a nonvoting industry representative. Nominations will be accepted
for current and upcoming vacancies effective with this notice.

DATES: Any industry organization interested in participating in the
selection of an appropriate nonvoting member to represent industry
interests must send a letter stating that interest to FDA by January
13, 2020 (see sections I and II of this document for further details).
Concurrently, nomination materials for prospective candidates should be
sent to FDA by January 13, 2020.

ADDRESSES: All statements of interest from industry organizations
interested in participating in the selection process of nonvoting
industry representative nomination should be sent to Margaret Ames (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). All nominations for a nonvoting
industry representative should be submitted electronically by accessing
the FDA Advisory Committee Membership Nomination Portal: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/FACTRSPortal/FACTRS/index.cfm or by mail
to Advisory Committee Oversight and Management Staff, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 5103, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002. Information about becoming a member of an FDA
advisory committee can also be obtained by visiting FDA's website at
https://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Ames, Division of Management
Services, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5213, Silver
Spring, MD 20993,<PHONE_NUMBER>, Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Agency is requesting nominations for a
nonvoting industry representative on the National Mammography Quality
Assurance Advisory Committee:

I. General Description of the Committee Duties

    The Committee shall advise FDA on: (1) Developing appropriate
quality standards and regulations for mammography facilities; (2)
developing appropriate standards and regulations for bodies accrediting
mammography facilities under this program; (3) developing regulations
with respect to sanctions; (4) developing procedures for monitoring
compliance with standards; (5) establishing a mechanism to investigate
consumer complaints; (6) reporting new developments concerning breast
imaging that should be considered in the oversight of mammography
facilities; (7) determining whether there exists a shortage of
mammography facilities in rural and health professional shortage areas
and determining the effects of personnel on access to the services of
such facilities in these areas; (8) determining whether there will
exist a sufficient number of medical physicists after October 1, 1999;
and (9) determining the costs and benefits of compliance with these
requirements.

II. Selection Procedure

    Any industry organization interested in participating in the
selection of an appropriate nonvoting member to represent industry
interests should send a letter stating that interest to the FDA contact
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) within 30 days of publication

of this document (see DATES). Within the subsequent 30 days, FDA will
send a letter to each organization that has expressed an interest,
attaching a complete list of all such organizations; and a list of all
nominees along with their current r[eacute]sum[eacute]s. The letter
will also state that it is the responsibility of the interested
organizations to confer with one another and to select a candidate,
within 60 days after the receipt of the FDA letter, to serve as the
nonvoting member to represent industry interests for the committee. The
interested organizations are not bound by the list of nominees in
selecting a candidate. However, if no individual is selected within 60
days, the Commissioner will select the nonvoting member to represent
industry interests.

III. Nomination Procedure

    Individuals may self-nominate and/or an organization may nominate
one or more individuals to serve as a nonvoting industry
representative. Nominations must include a current, complete
r[eacute]sum[eacute] or curriculum vitae for each nominee and a signed
copy of the Acknowledgement and Consent form available at the FDA
Advisory Nomination Portal (see ADDRESSES). Nominations must also
specify the advisory committee for which the nominee is recommended.
Nominations must also acknowledge that the nominee is aware of the
nomination unless self-nominated. FDA will forward all nominations to
the organizations expressing interest in participating in the selection
process for the committee. (Persons who nominate themselves as
nonvoting industry representatives will not participate in the
selection process.)
    FDA seeks to include the views of women and men, members of all
racial and ethnic groups, and individuals with and without disabilities
on its advisory committees and therefore encourages nominations of
appropriately qualified candidates from these groups. Specifically, in
this document, nominations for a nonvoting representative of industry
interests are encouraged from the mammography manufacturing industry.
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14, relating to advisory committees.

    Dated: December 6, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-26735 Filed 12-11-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: August 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 152)]
[Notices]
[Page 47863]
[DOCID:fr09au10-87]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, August
12, 2010 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday,
August 12, 2010 will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 5, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-19713 Filed 8-5-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: July 28, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 144)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 44152-44155]
[DOCID:fr28jy10-14]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 64

[Docket ID FEMA-2010-0003; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-8139]

Suspension of Community Eligibility

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule identifies communities, where the sale of flood
insurance has been authorized under the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP), that are scheduled for suspension on the effective
dates listed within this rule because of noncompliance with the
floodplain management requirements of the program. If the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) receives documentation that the
community has adopted the required floodplain management measures prior
to the effective suspension date given in this rule, the suspension
will not occur and a notice of this will be provided by publication in
the Federal Register on a subsequent date.

DATES: Effective Dates: The effective date of each community's
scheduled suspension is the third date (``Susp.'') listed in the third
column of the following tables.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you want to determine whether a
particular community was suspended on the suspension date or for
further information, contact David Stearrett, Mitigation Directorate,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP enables property owners to purchase
flood insurance which is generally not otherwise available. In return,
communities agree to adopt and administer local floodplain management
aimed at protecting lives and new construction from future flooding.
Section 1315 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended,
42 U.S.C. 4022, prohibits flood insurance coverage as authorized under
the NFIP, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; unless an appropriate public body
adopts adequate floodplain management measures with effective
enforcement measures. The communities listed in this document no longer
meet that statutory requirement for compliance with program
regulations, 44 CFR part 59. Accordingly, the communities will be
suspended on the effective date in the third column. As of that date,
flood insurance will no longer be available in the community. However,
some of these communities may adopt and submit the required
documentation of legally enforceable floodplain management measures
after this rule is published but prior to the actual suspension date.
These communities will not be suspended and will continue their
eligibility for the sale of insurance. A notice withdrawing the
suspension of the communities will be published in the Federal
Register.
    In addition, FEMA has identified the Special Flood Hazard Areas
(SFHAs) in these communities by publishing a Flood Insurance Rate Map
(FIRM). The date of the FIRM, if one has been published, is indicated
in the fourth column of the table. No direct Federal financial
assistance (except assistance pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act not in connection with a
flood) may legally be provided for construction or acquisition of
buildings in identified SFHAs for communities not participating in the
NFIP and identified for more than a year, on FEMA's initial flood
insurance map of the community as having flood-prone areas (section
202(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4106(a),
as amended). This prohibition against certain types of Federal
assistance becomes effective for the communities listed on the date
shown in the last column. The Administrator finds that notice and
public comment under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are impracticable and unnecessary
because communities listed in this final rule have been adequately
notified.
    Each community receives 6-month, 90-day, and 30-day notification
letters addressed to the Chief Executive Officer stating that the
community will be suspended unless the required floodplain management
measures are met prior to the effective suspension date. Since these
notifications were made, this final rule may take effect within less
than 30 days.
    National Environmental Policy Act. This rule is categorically
excluded from the requirements of 44 CFR part 10, Environmental
Considerations. No environmental impact assessment has been prepared.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. The Administrator has determined that
this rule is exempt from the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act because the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, 42
U.S.C. 4022, prohibits flood insurance coverage unless an appropriate
public body adopts adequate floodplain management measures with
effective enforcement measures. The communities listed no longer comply
with the statutory requirements, and after the effective date, flood
insurance will no longer be available in the communities unless
remedial action takes place.
    Regulatory Classification. This final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 of September 30, 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR
51735.
    Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This rule involves no policies
that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
    Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule meets the
applicable standards of Executive Order 12988.
    Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule does not involve any collection
of information for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 64

    Flood insurance, Floodplains.

0
Accordingly, 44 CFR part 64 is amended as follows:

PART 64--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 64 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp.; p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp.; p. 376.

Sec.  64.6  [Amended]

0
2. The tables published under the authority of Sec.  64.6 are amended
as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Effective date
                                                 authorization/
                                   Community    cancellation of    Current effective map   Date certain Federal
       State and location             No.        sale of flood             date            assistance no longer
                                                  insurance in                              available in SFHAs
                                                   community
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Region IV

Alabama:
    Eutaw, City of, Greene             010093  July 23, 1974,     Aug. 5, 2010..........  Aug. 5, 2010
     County.                                    Emerg; August
                                                19, 1985, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Greene County,                     010091  April 5, 1976,     ......*do.............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                      Emerg; April 16,
                                                1990, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
Georgia:
    Brooklet, Town of, Bulloch         130020  September 10,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    1975, Emerg;
                                                July 3, 1986,
                                                Reg; August 5,
                                                2010, Susp.
    Jenkins County,                    130118  January 16, 1976,  ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                      Emerg; September
                                                29, 1989, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Statesboro, City of,               130021  January 20, 1975,  ......do..............   Do.
     Bulloch County.                            Emerg; May 15,
                                                1980, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Unified Government of              130379  October 17, 1986,  ......do..............   Do.
     Georgetown, Quitman County.                Emerg; September
                                                1, 1987, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
Kentucky:
    Elliott County,                    210372  May 8, 1996,       ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                      Emerg; August 5,
                                                2010, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.

    Inez, City of, Martin              210362  May 19, 1988,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; May 19,
                                                1988, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Martin County,                     210166  April 14, 1977,    ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                      Emerg; February
                                                19, 1986, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Nicholas County,                   210181  April 17, 1975,    ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                      Emerg; September
                                                27, 1985, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Warfield, Town of, Martin          210364  N/A, Emerg;        ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    September 4,
                                                1986, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
            Region V

Illinois:
    Browning, Village of,              170606  June 12, 1974,     ......do..............   Do.
     Schuyler County.                           Emerg; August
                                                16, 1982, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    DuQuoin, City of, Perry            170539  June 13, 1975,     ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; July 2,
                                                1987, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Perry County,                      170538  September 13,      ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                      1996, Emerg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Reg; August 5,
                                                2010, Susp.
    Pinckneyville, City of,            170540  July 2, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     Perry County.                              Emerg; September
                                                16, 1982, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
           Region VI

Louisiana:
    Arnaudville, Town of, St.          220166  March 4, 1974,     ......do..............   Do.
     Landry and St. Martin                      Emerg; November
     Parishes.                                  1, 1985, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Cankton, Village of, St.           220167  March 5, 1975,     ......do..............   Do.
     Landry Parish.                             Emerg; June 25,
                                                1976, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Eunice, City of, Acadia and        220168  June 5, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     St. Landry Parishes.                       Emerg; June 1,
                                                1981, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Grand Coteau, Town of, St.         220169  September 26,      ......do..............   Do.
     Landry Parish.                             1975, Emerg;
                                                June 30, 1976,
                                                Reg; August 5,
                                                2010, Susp.
    Krotz Springs, Town of, St.        220170  May 30, 1973,      ......do..............   Do.
     Landry Parish.                             Emerg; January
                                                15, 1988, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Leonville, Town of, St.            220171  May 28, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     Landry Parish.                             Emerg; November
                                                9, 1982, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Melville, Town of, St.             220172  May 31, 1973,      ......do..............   Do.
     Landry Parish.                             Emerg; July 3,
                                                1978, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Opelousas, City of, St.            220173  December 12,       ......do..............   Do.
     Landry Parish.                             1974, Emerg;
                                                August 3, 1981,
                                                Reg; August 5,
                                                2010, Susp.
    Palmetto, Village of, St.          220174  April 12, 1974,    ......do..............   Do.
     Landry Parish.                             Emerg; April 15,
                                                1986, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Port Barre, Town of, St.           220175  February 28,       ......do..............   Do.
     Landry Parish.                             1974, Emerg;
                                                April 15, 1981,
                                                Reg; August 5,
                                                2010, Susp.
    St. Landry Parish,                 220165  May 15, 1973,      ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                      Emerg; May 3,
                                                1982, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Sunset, Town of, St. Landry        220176  April 24, 1975,    ......do..............   Do.
     Parish.                                    Emerg; March 30,
                                                1982, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Washington, Town of, St.           220177  May 1, 1975,       ......do..............   Do.
     Landry Parish.                             Emerg; May 1,
                                                1985, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
New Mexico:
    Aztec, City of, San Juan           350065  May 9, 1974,       ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; July 15,
                                                1988, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Bloomfield, City of, San           350066  June 19, 1975,     ......do..............   Do.
     Juan County.                               Emerg; August 8,
                                                1978, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Clovis, City of, Curry             350010  May 1, 1974,       ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; February
                                                4, 1981, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Curry County,                      350127  February 11,       ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                      2005, Emerg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Reg; August 5,
                                                2010, Susp.
    Farmington, City of, San           350067  August 30, 1974,   ......do..............   Do.
     Juan County.                               Emerg; September
                                                29, 1978, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
Oklahoma:
    Afton, Town of, Ottawa             400155  March 30, 1976,    ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; January
                                                3, 1986, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Commerce, City of, Ottawa          400156  February 7, 1983,  ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; July 18,
                                                1985, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Delaware County,                   400502  August 2, 1988,    ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                      Emerg; March 1,
                                                1990, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Fairland, Town of, Ottawa          400377  June 29, 1990,     ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; January
                                                1, 1992, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Grove, City of, Delaware           400385  April 12, 1976,    ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; February
                                                18, 1981, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Jay, Town of, Delaware             400057  August 5, 1976,    ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; July 5,
                                                1978, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.

    Miami, City of, Ottawa             400157  November 29,       ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    1974, Emerg;
                                                December 16,
                                                1980, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Ottawa County,                     400154  November 19,       ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                      1980, Emerg;
                                                December 2,
                                                1988, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Picher, City of, Ottawa            400159  May 25, 1976,      ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; September
                                                21, 1982, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Wyandotte, Town of, Ottawa         400161  July 12, 1976,     ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; December
                                                17, 1987, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
           Region VII

Kansas:
    Baldwin City, City of,             200088  June 23, 1975,     ......do..............   Do.
     Douglas County.                            Emerg; January
                                                2, 1980, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Douglas County,                    200087  May 30, 1975,      ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                      Emerg; March 2,
                                                1981, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
          Region VIII

South Dakota:
    Clay County, Unincorporated        460259  May 16, 1986,      ......do..............   Do.
     Areas.                                     Emerg; April 1,
                                                1987, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Vermillion, City of, Clay          460015  June 24, 1975,     ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; January
                                                30, 1984, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
Wyoming:
    Jackson, Town of, Teton            560052  August 8, 1975,    ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; May 4,
                                                1989, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Teton County,                      560094  April 19, 1978,    ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                      Emerg; May 4,
                                                1989, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
           Region IX

Nevada:
    Caliente, City of, Lincoln         320015  August 22, 1975,   ......do..............   Do.
     County.                                    Emerg; June 1,
                                                1982, Reg;
                                                August 5, 2010,
                                                Susp.
    Lincoln County,                    320014  December 12,       ......do..............   Do.
     Unincorporated Areas.                      1983, Emerg;
                                                March 1, 1984,
                                                Reg; August 5,
                                                2010, Susp.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*do =Ditto.
Code for reading third column: Emerg--Emergency; Reg--Regular; Susp--Suspension.

    Dated: July 15, 2010.
Sandra K. Knight,
Deputy Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administrator, Mitigation.
[FR Doc. 2010-18449 Filed 7-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P