[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 214 (Thursday, November 5, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 68444]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28292]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2015-0962]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal
Canal, Alameda, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the High Street Drawbridge across the
Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal, mile 6.0, at Alameda, CA. The
deviation is necessary to allow the bridge owner to replace the center
span lock. This deviation allows the bridge to remain in the closed-to-
navigation position during the deviation period.

DATES: This deviation is effective without actual notice from November
5, 2015 through 6:30 p.m. on November 25, 2015. For the purpose of
enforcement, actual notice will be used from 2:30 p.m. on October 21,
2015 until November 5, 2015.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this deviation, [USCG-2015-0962] is available
at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary deviation, call or email David H. Sulouff, Chief, Bridge
Section, Eleventh Coast Guard District; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Alameda County Public Works Agency has
requested a temporary change to the operation of the High Street
Drawbridge, mile 6.0, over Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal, at
Alameda, CA. The bridge provides a vertical clearance of 16 feet above
Mean High Water in the closed-to-navigation position. The bridge
currently operates under 33 CFR 117.181. Navigation on the waterway is
commercial and recreational.
    The bridge will be secured in the closed-to-navigation position,
October 26, 2015 through November 25, 2015, Monday through Friday, 9:30
a.m. to 6:30 p.m., due to replacement of the center span lock. During
nights and weekends, the bridge will be able to open upon 2 hours
advance notice with single leaf openings. During working hours a 15-
foot wide scaffold at mid-channel will reduced vertical clearance by 9
feet. This temporary deviation has been coordinated with the waterway
users. No objections to the proposed temporary deviation were raised.
    Vessels able to pass through the bridge in the closed position may
do so at anytime. The bridge will not be able to open for emergencies
and there is an alternate route for shallow draft vessels through San
Leandro Bay. The Coast Guard will also inform the users of the waterway
by our Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the change in
operating schedule for the bridge so they can arrange their transits to
minimize any impact caused by the temporary deviation.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the effective
period of this temporary deviation. This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: October 21, 2015.
D.H. Sulouff,
District Bridge Chief, Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2015-28292 Filed 11-4-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 231 (Monday, December 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72079-72080]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28782]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0531; FRL 9903-39-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; Restructuring of the Stationary Source Audit
Program (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), Restructuring

of the Stationary Source Audit Program (Renewal), to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a proposed extension of the ICR,
which is currently approved through January 31, 2014. Public comments
were previously requested via the Federal Register (78 FR 51183) on
August 20, 2013 during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for
an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller description of the
ICR is given below, including its estimated burden and cost to the
public. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before January 2,
2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OAR-2008-0531, to: (1) The EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation
Docket, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20460; and (2) OMB by mail to: Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for
EPA, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503.
    The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Candace Sorrell, Air Quality Analysis
Division (E143-2), Environmental Protection Agency; telephone number
(919) 541-1064; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For further information
about the EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    EPA ICR Number: 2355.03
    OMB Control Number: 2060-0652
    Abstract: This ICR concerns the reporting of the true value of the
audit sample to the compliance authority (state, local or EPA Regional
Office) by the accredited audit sample provider (AASP) as required in
the General Provisions of Parts 51, 60, 61 and 63. This ICR covers the
period of 2014-2016.
    The required audit program started on June 16, 2013. A regulated
emisson source conducting a compliance test would purchase an audit
sample from an AASP. The AASP would report the true value of the audit
sample to the compliance authority (state, local or EPA Regional
Office). The AASP would, in most cases, make the report by electronic
mail. A report would be made for each audit sample that the AASP sold
to a regulated emission source that was conducting an emissions test to
determine compliance with an emission limit.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Laboratories that supply audit
samples.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Voluntary.
    Estimated total number of potential respondents: 9
    Frequency of response: There is no regular schedule for collecting
information. The information is event driven and information is
collected only when an AASP supplies an audit sample to a user.
    Total estimated burden: 2,646 hours per year. Burden is defined at
5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $201,116 per year. This includes the cost of
preparing, validating, disturbing and reporting the audit results.
    Changes in the Estimates: There are no changes in the hours in the
total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently
approved by OMB.

John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-28782 Filed 11-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D. C. 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES September 29, 2005 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Revised Environmental Fate Assessment of 4 tert Amylphenol and its Potassium and Sodium salts for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision ( RED) Document Case No.: 3016 DP Barcode: 322006 FROM: Srinivas Gowda, Microbiologist/ Chemist Risk Assessment and Science Support Branch ( RASSB) Antimicrobials Division ( 7510C)

TO: Mark Hartman, Branch Chief Benjamin Chambliss, Team Leader Killian Swift, Chemical Review Manager Regulatory Management Branch II Antimicrobials Division ( 7510C)

Deborah Smegal, Risk Assessor Risk Assessment and Science Support Branch ( RASSB) Antimicrobials Division ( 7510C)

THRU: Siroos Mostaghimi, Acting Team Leader, Team one Risk Assessment and Science Support Branch ( RASSB) Antimicrobials Division ( 7510C)

Norman Cook, Branch Chief Risk Assessment and Science Support Branch ( RASSB) Antimicrobials Division ( 7510C)

Chemical Name PC Code CAS # Common Name 4 tert Amylphenol 064101 80 46 6 p tert amylphenol Potassium 4 tert amylphenate 064111 53404 18 5 Potassium p tert amylphenate Sodium 4 tert amylphenate 064112 31366 95 7 Sodium p tert amylphenate Environmental Fate Science Chapter and Fate Assessment on 4 tert Amylphenol and its 2 potassium and sodium salts is submitted for Reregistration Eligibility Decision ( RED).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Environmental Fate Assessment:

The environmental fate assessment for 4 tert Amylphenol and its potassium and sodium salts is based on US EPA =

s Estimation Programs Interface ( EPI) Suite. EPI Suite provides estimations of physical/ chemical properties and environmental fate properties.

4 tert Amylphenol may be bioaccumlative ( log KOW 3.91) and is likely to pose a concern for aquatic organisms. It is expected to have moderate to slight mobility in soils based upon the estimated Koc value of 3799. Estimated value for biodegradation probability indicates that it may biodegrade linearly within days in aquatic medium. However, ultimate biodegradation ( mineralization) may take months. Ready Biodegradability study results also indicate that the relationship between biodegradation of 4 tert Amylphenol and time appears to be linier in an aqueous medium and ultimate biodegradation would occur over a period longer than a month. It is volatile and may vaporize into atmosphere. The estimated half life in the air for 4 tert Amylphenol is about three hours which indicates that it is not persistent in air. Because of the possibility of biodegradation in water and soils, it is not likely to contaminate surface and ground waters.

p tert Amylphenol, potassium salt, is not likely to be bioaccumlative ( log KOW 1.23) and may not pose a concern for bioconcentration in aquatic organisms. It may be expected to have moderate to slight mobility in soils as its estimated Koc value is 3799. Estimated probability of biodegradation of p tert Amylphenol, potassium salt, in soils and water indicates that it is likely to biodegrade within days to weeks. Therefore, it may be unlikely that soil and water contamination would take place. It has low volatility and its estimated half life in air is about 4.68 hours and is not likely to be persistent in air.

p tert Amylphenol, sodium salt, is not likely to be bioaccumlative ( log KOW is 1.23) and may not pose a concern for bioconcentration in aquatic organisms. It may be expected to have moderate to slight mobility in soils as its estimated Koc value is the same as the parent molecule, 4 tert Amylphenol. Probability for Sodium 4 tert amylphenate biodegradation is the same as the parent molecule, 4 tert Amylphenol. Hence it is not likely to persist in soils and water, and surface and ground water contamination is not likely to occur. It has low volatility and its estimated half life in air is about 4.68 hours and is not likely to be persistent in air. 3 4 APPENDIX Environmental Fate Science Chapter for para tert amylphenol:

4 tert Amylphenol is registered as an active product and is used as bactericide/ fungicide/ fungistat. For the Reregistration Eligibility Decision ( RED) process the Agency used an in house database program, Estimation Programs Interface ( EPI) Suite, and open literature ( Toxnet) to obtain fate properties of para tert Amylphenol. The Agency lacks database on environmental fate/ transport properties of p tert Amylphenol. Hence Agency made use of the Windows based suite of physical/ chemical properties and environmental estimation models developed by the US EPA =

s Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic substances ( OPPTS) and Syracuse Research Institute ( SRC). The following fate properties were obtained from EPI Suite and TOXNET.

1. Vapor Pressure: 0.00116 mm Hg at 25oC ( 1)

2. Henry =

s law Constant ( air/ water partition coefficient): 2.03 x 10 6 atm m3/ mole at 25oC ( 1)

3. Log KOC ( organic carbon ratio in soil): 3.57 ( Koc: 3799 ) ( 1)

4. Log KOW ( octanol/ water partition coefficient): 3.91 ( 1)

5. Water solubility: 113 mg/ L ( 1)

6. Log bioconcentration factor ( BCF) is 2.313 ( BCF = 205.7) ( 1)

7. Medium to slight soil mobility. ( 1)

8. May undergo direct air photolysis, half life in air ( estimated) is 3.07 hours due to induced photochemical reaction of atmospheric hydroxyl radical ( 2)

9. Abiotic Degradation: Phenols are generally resistant to aqueous environmental hydrolysis. Therefore, 4 tert Amylphenol is not expected to hydrolyze in environmental media ( SRC) ( 2)

The estimated value for biodegradation probability indicates that 4 t amylphenol may biodegrade linearly within days in aquatic medium. However, ultimate biodegradation ( mineralization) may take months. Aquatic hydrolysis, oxidation, volatilization, bioconcentration, and adsorption to sediment are not expected to be significant fate processes for para tert Amylphenol because of its lack of hydrolyzable hydrogen. Because of a low Henry =

s Law Constant, volatilization of para tert Amylphenol to partition from surface water to air is likely to be minimum. Based upon Koc value of 3799, para tert Amylphenol has a moderate to slight soil mobility. Adsorption to sediment is not expected to be important fate process. The KOW indicates that bioaccumulation in aquatic organisms like fish is not likely. With a vapor pressure of 0.00116 mm Hg at 25oC para tert Amylphenol likely to vaporize easily from soils and degrades rapidly by reaction with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals ( half life of ~ 3.07 hours) in air.

Ready Biodegradability ( OPPTS Guideline No. 835.3110, MRID No. 466247 01) ( 3)

This study was reviewed by the Agency, and satisfies the OPPTS 835.3110 guideline requirements for a biodegradation study. Biodegradability was investigated under aerobic static exposure conditions using the CO2 Evolution Test. 5 Based on the data of the individual inorganic carbon determinations, the mean biodegradability in the CO2 Evolution Test of p tert Amylphenol was calculated to be 73% after 28 days. The biodegradation of p tert Amylphenol reached 52% at the end of the 10 day window. Significant biodegradation of the test substance was observed after a lag phase of about 7 days. The procedural control, sodium benzoate, reached 86% biodegradation after 14 days. This confirms the validity of the test, as the OPPTS guidelines require that the procedural control reach at least 60% degradation by day 14. p tert Amylphenol did not reach the pass level of 60% for ready biodegradability in the CO2 Evolution Test within the 10 day window.

The results from the ready biodegradability study are consistent with the above stated biodegradation statements based on the estimated value. The relationship between biodegradation of the test chemical and time appears to be linear based on inspection of the graph presented in the ready biodegradation study report. The p tert Amylphenol was found not to be readily biodegradable. Over the 28 day test period, 73% degradation had occurred, suggesting that ultimate biodegradation would occur over a period longer than a month.

Surface water and Ground Water Contamination:

4 tert Amylphenol has been found in an effluent sample from a municipal waste water treatment plant. However, the estimated value for biodegradation indicates it may biodegrade linearly within days in the aquatic environment. Ultimate biodegradation ( mineralization) may take months. It is also volatile based on its vapor pressure of 0.00116 mmHg, and has a moderate to slight mobility in soils based on its estimated Koc value of 3799. Thus, it is not likely to contaminate surface and ground waters. 6 Environmental Fate Science Chapter For para tert Amylphenol, potassium salt:

p tert Amylphenol, potassium salt, is registered as an active product. For the Reregistration Eligibility Decision ( RED) process the Agency used an in house database program, Estimation Programs Interface ( EPI) Suite, and open literature ( Toxnet) to obtain fate properties of p tert Amylphenol, potassium salt. The Agency lacks database on environmental fate/ transport properties of p tert Amylphenol. Hence Agency made use of the Windows based suite of physical/ chemical properties and environmental estimation models developed by the US EPA =

s Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic substances ( OPPTS) and Syracuse Research Institute ( SRC). The following fate properties were obtained from EPI Suite.

1. Vapor Pressure: 7.7 x 10 10 mm Hg at 25oC ( 1)

2. Henry law Constant ( air/ water partition coefficient): 5.379 x 10 14 atm m3/ mole at 25oC ( 1)

3. Log KOC ( organic carbon ratio in soil): 3.57 ( KOC: 3799) ( 1)

4. Log KOW ( octanol/ water partition coefficient): 1.23 ( 1)

5. Water solubility: 3811 mg/ L ( 1)

6. Log bioconcentration factor ( BCF) is 2.313 ( BCF = 205.7) ( 1)

7. Medium to slight mobility in soil. ( 1)

8. May undergo direct air photolysis, half life in air ( estimated) is 4.68 hours due to induced photochemical reaction of atmospheric hydroxyl radical.( 1)

Estimated probability of biodegradation of p tert Amylphenol, potassium salt, in soils and water indicates that it is likely to biodegrade within days to weeks. Aquatic hydrolysis, oxidation, volatilization, bioconcentration, and adsorption to sediment are not expected to be significant fate processes for p tert Amylphenol, potassium salt, because of its lack of hydrolyzable hydrogen. Because of a low Henry =

s Law Constant, volatilization of p tert Amylphenol, potassium salt, to partition from surface water to air is likely to be minimum. Koc value of 3799 indicates that paratert Amylphenol, potassium salt, has a moderate to slight soil mobility. The KOW indicates that bioaccumulation in aquatic organisms like fish is not likely. The estimated BCF ( 205.7) value indicates that bioaccumulation is likely be low. p tert Amylphenol, potassium salt degrades rapidly by reaction with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals ( half life of ~ 4.68 hours) in air.

Surface Water and Ground Water Contamination:

Due to a Koc value of 3799, p tert Amylphenol, potassium salt, has a moderate to slight mobility in soil. Biodegradation of p tert Amylphenol, potassium salt, is likely, based on estimated high probability of linear biodegradation. Estimated probability of biodegradation of ptert Amylphenol, potassium salt, in soils and water indicates that it is likely to biodegrade within days to weeks. Thus, it is unlikely that there will be soil and water contamination. 7 Environmental Fate Science Chapter For para tert Amylphenol, sodium salt:

p tert Amylphenol, sodium salt, is registered as an active product. For the Reregistration Eligibility Decision ( RED) process the Agency used an in house database program, Estimation Programs Interface ( EPI) Suite, and open literature ( Toxnet) to obtain fate properties of p tert Amylphenol, sodium salt. The Agency lacks database on environmental fate/ transport properties of p tert Amylphenol. Hence Agency made use of the Windows based suite of physical/ chemical properties and environmental estimation models developed by the US EPA =

s Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic substances ( OPPTS) and Syracuse Research Institute ( SRC). The following fate properties were obtained from EPI Suite.

1. Vapor Pressure: 7.7 x 10 10 mm Hg at 25oC ( 1)

2. Henry law Constant ( air/ water partition coefficient): 4.10 x 10 14 atm m3/ mole at 25oC ( 1)

3. Log KOC ( organic carbon ratio in soil): 3.57 ( KOC: 3799) ( 1)

4. Log KOW ( octanol/ water partition coefficient): 1.23 ( 1)

5. Water solubility: 4595 mg/ L ( 1)

6. Log bioconcentration factor ( BCF) is 2.313 ( BCF = 205.7) ( 1)

7. Medium to slight mobility in soil. ( 1)

8. May undergo direct air photolysis, half life in air ( estimated) is 4.68 hours due to induced photochemical reaction of atmospheric hydroxyl radical.( 1)

Estimated probability of biodegradation of p tert Amylphenol, sodium salt, in soils and water indicates that it is likely to biodegrade within days to weeks. Aquatic hydrolysis, oxidation, volatilization, bioconcentration, and adsorption to sediment are not expected to be significant fate processes for p tert Amylphenol, sodium salt, because of its lack of hydrolyzable hydrogen. Because of a low Henry =

s Law Constant, volatilization of p tert Amylphenol, sodium salt, to partition from surface water to air is likely to be minimum. Koc value of 3799 indicates that paratert Amylphenol, sodium salt, has a medium to slight soil mobility. The KOW indicates that bioaccumulation in aquatic organisms like fish is not likely. The estimated BCF ( 205.7) value indicates that bioaccumulation is likely be low. p tert Amylphenol, sodium salt, degrades rapidly by reaction with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals ( half life of ~ 4.68 hours) in air.

Surface Water and Ground Water Contamination:

Due to a Koc value of 3799, p tert Amylphenol, sodium salt, has a moderate to slight mobility in soil. Biodegradation of p tert Amylphenol, sodium salt, in soil is likely, based on the estimated high probability of linear biodegradation. Estimated probability of biodegradation of ptert Amylphenol, sodium, in soils and water indicates that it is likely to biodegrade within days to 8 weeks. Thus, it is unlikely that there will be soil and water contamination.

Data Gap:

Para tert amylphenol and its potassium and sodium salts are registered as indoor use products and minimum environmental fate data required by EPA for an indoor use product is hydrolysis ( 161 1). However, no hydrolysis data as indicated in the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Fate Data Requirements published in Pesticide Assessment Guidelines, Subdivision N, § 161 1 have been submitted to the Agency for these chemicals. 9 BIBLIOGRAPHY MRID Citation  ( 1) The Estimation Programs Interface ( EPI) Suite. Windows based suite of physical/ chemical properties and environmental estimation models developed by the US EPA =

s Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic substances ( OPPTS) and Syracuse Research Institute ( SRC). http:// www. epa. gov/ opptintr/ exposure/ docs/ EPISuitedl. htm  ( 2) Hazard Substances Databank ( HSDB). A Database of the National Library of Medicine =

s TOXNET System.

46624701 ( 3) Haner, A. 1999. p tert. Amylphenol: Ready Biodegradability   Evaluation of the Aerobic Biodegradability in an Aqueous Medium: OECD 301 B: CO2 Evolution Test. Report No. 427/ b 99. Unpublished study prepared by BMG Engineering Ltd., Schlieren for Clariant Corporation, Charlotte, NC


[Federal Register: April 7, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 67)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 18719-18720]
[DOCID:fr07ap08-12]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0403; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-166-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and MD-
11F Airplanes Equipped With General Electric CF6-80C2 Series Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and MD-11F airplanes. This
proposed AD would require revising the airplane flight manual to advise
the flightcrew to use certain procedures during descent in certain
icing conditions. This proposed AD results from reports of several in-
flight engine flameouts, including multiple dual engine flameout
events, in ice-crystal icing conditions. We are proposing this AD to
ensure that the flightcrew has the proper procedures to follow in
certain icing conditions. These certain icing conditions could cause a
multiple engine flameout during flight without the ability of the
engines to be relit, and consequent forced landing of the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 22, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard,
Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service Management,
Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024).

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Lee, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0403;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-166-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We have received reports indicating that there have been six (two
dual) engine flameout events on McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11
airplanes, in ice-crystal icing conditions during descent. These
airplanes were equipped with General Electric (GE) CF6-80C2 series
engines. Each flameout was in or near convective weather with ice-
crystal icing; this type of icing does not appear on radar due to its
low reflectivity, and neither the airplane ice detectors nor visual
indications indicate the presence of this type of icing conditions.
Therefore, it is usually undetected by the flightcrew. These conditions
can cause ice crystals to accumulate in the core flow path of the
engine during low-power conditions, such as idle or idle descent. The
accumulated ice sheds during throttle increase and is ingested into the
engine, causing the combustor to flameout resulting in an in-flight
flameout and potential damage to the high pressure compressor due to
ice impact.
    Activating the anti-ice system increases the flameout margin and
reduces the potential for multiple engine flameouts by increasing bleed
flow and engine idle speed. However, in some of the subject engine
flameouts, the anti-ice was already on when the engines flamed out. In
each event, the engines relit and continued to operate normally for the
remainder of the flight. Having the igniters on is necessary to ensure
that the engine will relight quickly.
    This condition, if not corrected, could result in a multiple engine
flameout during flight without the ability of the engines to be relit,
and consequent forced landing of the airplane.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes
of this same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require revising the airplane flight manual (AFM) to advise
the flightcrew to use certain procedures during descent in certain
icing conditions.

Interim Action

    We consider this proposed AD interim action. If final action is
later identified, we might consider further rulemaking then.

Costs of Compliance

    There are about 118 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The following table provides the estimated costs for
U.S. operators to comply with this proposed AD.

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of U.S.-
                      Action                           Work hours     Average labor        Parts           Cost per        registered       Fleet cost
                                                                      rate per hour                        airplane        airplanes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFM revision......................................               1              $80               $0              $80               70           $5,600
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec.  39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

McDonnell Douglas: Docket No. FAA-2008-0403; Directorate Identifier
2007-NM-166-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by May 22,
2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 and MD-11F
airplanes, certified in any category, equipped with General Electric
CF6-80C2 series engines.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from reports of several in-flight engine
flameouts, including multiple dual engine flameout events, in ice-
crystal icing conditions. We are issuing this AD to ensure that the
flightcrew has the proper procedures to follow in certain icing
conditions. These certain icing conditions could cause a multiple
engine flameout during flight without the ability of the engines to
be relit, and consequent forced landing of the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revision

    (f) Within 14 days after the effective date of this AD, revise
the Limitations Section of the McDonnell Douglas MD-11/MD-11F AFM to
include the following statement. This may be done by inserting a
copy of this AD into the AFM.
    ``Prior to reducing thrust for descent in visible moisture when
TAT is 6 [deg]C and below, the ENG IGN OVRD switch and the ENG,
WING, and TAIL ANTI-ICE switches must be placed in the ON
position.''

    Note 1: When a statement identical to that in paragraph (f) of
this AD has been included in the general revisions of the AFM, the
general revisions may be inserted into the AFM, and the copy of this
AD may be removed from the AFM.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (g)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 27, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-7151 Filed 4-4-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: February 26, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 38)]
[Notices]
[Page 10240-10241]
[DOCID:fr26fe08-45]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings  1

February 20, 2008.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER08-221-002.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits response to 1/11/08
deficiency letter regarding PJM's 11/15/07 filing of an executed
interconnection service agreement among PJM, Ameresco Stafford LLC and
Virginia Electric and Power Company.
    Filed Date: 02/14/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080219-0092.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, March 6, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-411-002.
    Applicants: Tiger Natural Gas, Inc.
    Description: Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. submits Asset Appendix--2
pages and FERC Electric Tariff-Substitute Original Sheet.
    Filed Date: 02/14/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080219-0093.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, March 6, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-516-001.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits revisions to the
Reliability Pricing Model at Section 510 et al. of the Attachment DD of
the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff in order to reflect recently
increased construction cost.
    Filed Date: 02/14/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080219-0094.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, March 6, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-527-001.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of Colorado.
    Description: Public Service Company of Colorado submits First
Revised Sheets 12 et al. to its First Revised Schedule FERC 44 et al.,
as an errata to its 2/1/08 filing.
    Filed Date: 02/14/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080219-0095.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, March 6, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-563-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits an executed
interconnection service agreement among PJM, Shaffer Mountain Wind LLC
and Pennsylvania Electric Company a FirstEnergy Company.
    Filed Date: 02/14/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080219-0091.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, March 6, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-565-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Pacific Gas and Electric Co. submits agreements for
additional capacity with Wellhead Power Panoche, LLC.
    Filed Date: 02/15/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080219-0147.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, March 7, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-566-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Pacific Gas and Electric Company submits filing and
acceptance two new agreements between PG&E and the Western Area Power
Administration.
    Filed Date: 02/15/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080219-0096.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, March 7, 2008.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the

eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-3565 Filed 2-25-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6660-6662]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02974]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-82659; File No. SR-ICEEU-2017-011]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Europe Limited; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amendments to the ICE Clear
Europe Collateral and Haircut Policy

February 8, 2018.

I. Introduction

    On November 2, 2017, ICE Clear Europe Limited (``ICE Clear
Europe'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to modify the ICE Clear Europe Collateral and
Haircut Policy to incorporate certain changes to the calculation of
absolute collateral limits for bonds provided as Permitted Cover by
Clearing Members and make certain clarifications and updates and add
certain general provisions.\3\ The proposed rule change was published
for comment in the Federal Register on November 17, 2017.\4\ The
Commission did not receive comments regarding the proposed rule change.
On December 27, 2017, the Commission designated a longer period for
Commission action on the proposed rule change.\5\ For the reasons
discussed below, the Commission is approving the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Capitalized terms used in this order but not defined herein
have the same meanings specified in the ICE Clear Europe Clearing
Rules.
    \4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82063 (Nov. 13, 2017),
82 FR 54423 (Nov. 17, 2017) (SR-ICEEU-2017-011) (``Notice'').
    \5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82405 (Dec. 27, 2017),
83 FR 181 (Jan. 2, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change

    The proposed rule change would amend ICE Clear Europe's Collateral
and Haircut Policy to set the absolute collateral limits for bonds
provided as Permitted Cover by Clearing Members so as to more
accurately capture the trading liquidity of each bond. The proposal
would also take into account ICE Clear Europe's committed repo
facilities to permit Clearing Members to maintain collateral in excess
of normal absolute limits.\6\ In addition, the proposed rule change
would revise the haircut calculation. Finally, the proposed rule change
would update the Collateral and Haircut Policy to add certain general
provisions designed to enhance ICE Clear Europe's governance. These
changes are further described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ As used herein, the term ``absolute limit'' refers to the
maximum amount of bonds from an individual issuer that ICE Clear
Europe will accept from a Member Group. See Notice, 82 FR at 54424.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to setting absolute collateral limits for bonds
provided as Permitted Cover by Clearing Members, ICE Clear Europe
proposed to set limits for each bond issuer and collateral type at 10%
of the average daily volume over the past three months, rounded to the
nearest million.\7\ The proposed rule change would also change the
underlying data used in the calculation of the absolute limit from a
repo survey of market participants to actual secondary market trading
volume data provided by ICE Data Services, except where official
trading volume data is

available from a primary source, such as a governmental agency or
central bank.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Id.
    \8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To complement the changes to the absolute collateral limits
described above, ICE Clear Europe proposed changes to its haircut
methodology. In particular, the proposed rule change would amend the
haircut methodology to include a two-sided VaR estimation based on the
largest absolute returns.\9\ The proposed rule change would also amend
the Collateral and Haircut Policy to note scenarios in which the ICE
Clear Europe Clearing Risk Department may consider other factors in
setting haircuts, such as the effects caused by changes in the
different underlying bonds used to build bond price time-series or the
impact of unexpected currency events on the calculation of cross-
currency FX haircuts.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Id.
    \10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the proposed rule change would also amend the
Collateral and Haircut Policy to account for ICE Clear Europe's
committed repo facilities. For example, in certain circumstances, ICE
Clear Europe permits a Clearing Member to maintain a collateral bond
position that otherwise exceeds the applicable absolute collateral
limits if ICE Clear Europe is able to determine that it would be able
to use its committed repo facility to convert the excess collateral
securities into cash. In addition, to permit the use of repo facilities
in this way, the proposed rule change also clarifies that the repo
facilities are available at any time there is an intra-day liquidity
need and not just in case of Clearing Member default.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the proposed rule change would amend the Collateral and
Haircut Policy to update references to internal ICE Clear Europe
personnel, departments and committees and to explain the process for
validation and oversight of the models used to support the Collateral
and Haircut Policy.

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act directs the Commission to approve a
proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that
such proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such
organization.\12\ For the reasons given below, the Commission finds
that the proposal is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
\13\ and Rules 17Ad-22(e)(2) and (5) thereunder.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2), (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Consistency With Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act

    Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires, among other things, that
the rules of a registered clearing agency be designed to assure the
safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the custody or
control of the clearing agency or for which it is responsible and, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest.\15\ The proposed
rule change will enhance ICE Clear Europe's ability to control the
credit, liquidity, and market risks stemming from the collateral it
accepts by establishing a maximum amount of bonds from an individual
issuer that ICE Clear Europe will accept from a Member Group as
collateral. These new maximum amounts will be derived from actual
secondary market trading volume data, and therefore should be more
reliable than the prior absolute limits, which as noted above, were
based on a repo survey of market participants as a proxy for trading
liquidity. Therefore, these limits should be more accurate, and
consequently, enhance ICE Clear Europe's ability to liquidate the bond
collateral in a timely manner. Further, the proposed rule change also
proposes to incorporate a two-sided VaR estimation based on the largest
absolute returns for purposes of setting haircuts. Taken together these
two changes should enhance ICE Clear Europe's ability to manage the
credit, liquidity, and market risks it faces from posted collateral,
and therefore enhance ICE Clear Europe's ability to safeguard
securities and funds which are in its custody or control or for which
it is responsible. Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is designed to assure the safeguarding of securities and
funds which are in the custody or control of ICE Clear Europe or for
which it is responsible and, in general, protects investors and the
public interest, and is therefore consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F)
of the Act.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \16\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(e)(5)

    The Commission further finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(5). Rule 17Ad-22(e)(5) requires that a
covered clearing agency establish, implement, maintain and enforce
written policies and procedures reasonably designed to limit the assets
it accepts as collateral to those with low credit, liquidity, and
market risks, and set and enforce appropriately conservative haircuts
and concentration limits if the covered clearing agency requires
collateral to manage its or its participants' credit exposure; and
require a review of the sufficiency of its collateral haircuts and
concentration limits to be performed not less than annually.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change will enhance ICE Clear Europe's ability to
control the liquidity and market risks stemming from the posting of
collateral by establishing a maximum amount of bonds from an individual
issuer that ICE Clear Europe will accept from a Member Group as
collateral. The proposed rule change will improve the accuracy of the
Collateral and Haircut Policy by taking into account the trading
liquidity of the bond using secondary market trading volume data
provided by ICE Data Services. Moreover, by updating the Collateral and
Haircut Policy to incorporate a two-sided VaR estimation based on the
largest absolute returns, the proposed rule change will capture a
broader range of price volatility information, thereby enhancing ICE
Clear Europe's ability to liquidate the bond collateral in a timely
manner without losses beyond the given haircuts. The Commission finds
that these aspects of the proposed rule change are intended to limit
the assets ICE Clear Europe accepts as collateral to those with low
credit, liquidity, and market risks, and to set and enforce
appropriately conservative haircuts. Therefore, the proposed rule
change is consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(5).\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Consistency with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(2)

    Rule 17Ad-22(e)(2) requires that a covered clearing agency
establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and
procedures reasonably designed to provide for governance arrangements
that are clear and transparent and support the public interest
requirements in Section 17A of the Act applicable to clearing agencies,
and the objectives of owners and participants.\19\ The proposed rule
change will update references to internal ICE Clear Europe personnel,
departments and committees and will explain the process for validation
and oversight of the models used to support the Collateral and Haircut
Policy. Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change
is consistent with the requirement in Rule 17Ad-

22(e)(2) concerning governance arrangements that are clear and
transparent and that support the public interest requirements of
Section 17A of the Act applicable to clearing agencies and the
objectives of participants.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2)(i) and (iii).
    \20\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in
particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \21\ and
Rules 17Ad-22(e)(2) and (5) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act
\22\ that the proposed rule change (SR-ICEEU-2017-011) be, and hereby
is, approved.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \23\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-02974 Filed 2-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P