[Federal Register: May 12, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 92)]
[Notices]
[Page 27762-27763]
[DOCID:fr12my06-114]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-53770; File No. SR-NASD-2006-030]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment
No. 1 Thereto To Establish an Annual Administrative Fee for Market Data
Distributors That Are Recipients of Nasdaq Proprietary Data Products

May 8, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on February 27, 2006, the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. (``NASD''), through its subsidiary, The Nasdaq Stock
Market, Inc. (``Nasdaq''), filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by Nasdaq.
Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change on April 17,
2006. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on
the proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Nasdaq proposes to establish an annual administrative fee for
market data distributors that are recipients of Nasdaq proprietary data
products. The text of the proposed rule change is below. Proposed new
language is in italics.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Changes are marked to the rule text that appears in the
electronic NASD Manual found at http://www.nasd.com. No pending rule

filings would affect the text of this rule. Because of the nature of
this rule, no conforming change will be made to the rules of The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
53128 (January 13, 2006), 71 FR 3550 (January 23, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

7010 System Services

    (a)-(w) No change.

(x) Nasdaq Annual Administrative Fee

    The Nasdaq Annual Administrative Fee shall be assessed to market
data distributors that receive any proprietary Nasdaq data feed
product. Each such distributor shall, on an annual basis, be assessed
the higher of the applicable Nasdaq Annual Administrative Fees:
    Delayed Nasdaq distributor--$500.
    Real-Time Nasdaq distributor (includes delayed fee, if
applicable)--$1,000.
    The Association may waive the foregoing fee for colleges and
universities for devices used by students and professors in performing
university or college research or classroom-related activities.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    As market data administration becomes more automated, Nasdaq has
strived to ensure that its systems lead the industry in ease of use and
effectiveness. In the past few years, Nasdaq has implemented a
multitude of systems to improve vendor communication. This trend is
likely to continue, as market data distributors demand greater
automation of the process to subscribe to market data feeds, increased
electronic access to information regarding their market data usage, and
shorter processing times to approve requests for changes in service.
    To further Nasdaq's proactive approach to improving market data
administration, Nasdaq proposes to introduce an annual administrative
fee for all distributors receiving proprietary Nasdaq data feed
products. This fee will allow Nasdaq to recover the ongoing fixed
market data administrative costs, such as the costs of establishing and
maintaining new market data distributors, as well as the costs to
maintain and improve the administrative tools distributors utilize to
subscribe to and monitor their data products usage.
    Currently, Nasdaq market data distributors are not assessed an
annual administrative fee for the use of proprietary Nasdaq data feed
products.\4\ The amount of the new fee, which will be assessed on an
annual basis, will vary based on whether a distributor uses Nasdaq data
on a delayed or a real-time basis. A distributor that only receives
delayed data will pay the Delayed Nasdaq Annual Administrative Fee of
$500; a distributor that receives real-time data will pay the Real-Time
Nasdaq Annual Administrative Fee of $1,000, and a distributor that
receives both real-time and delayed data feeds will pay the Real-Time
Nasdaq Annual Administrative Fee of $1,000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Distributors pay an annual administrative fee regarding
their usage of UTP data feed products. See NASD Rule 7010(l)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with the current practice of the American Stock
Exchange,\5\ Nasdaq is proposing that accredited colleges and
universities that can establish that they are using proprietary data
for research and classroom-related activities may receive a waiver of
the administrative fee. This fee waiver recognizes the high value that
Nasdaq places on research and educational instruction at the university
level. To be considered for an academic waiver, the university's
program sponsor should submit to Nasdaq a written request stating the
name and description of the academic program, the company and contact
name of the external distributor to provide the data, the number of
devices with access to real-time data, an

approximate number of students and faculty in the program, and a brief
description of how market data will be used in the program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Amex Academic Waiver Policy at http://www.amex.com/amextrader.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 15A of the Act,\6\ in general and with
Section 15A(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that the revised and
updated fee schedule provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable charges among the persons distributing and purchasing Nasdaq
market center data. Nasdaq believes the proposed fees will enable
Nasdaq to provide a lower total cost of market data ownership, given
the reduced network and processing expenses associated with receiving
only the data actually needed. Nasdaq believes that facilitating more
efficient redistribution of real-time market data will improve
transparency and thereby benefit the investing public.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3.
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which Nasdaq consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
; or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File No. SR-NASD-2006-030 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2006-030. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of NASD.
    All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2006-030
and should be submitted on or before June 2, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-7256 Filed 5-11-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 166 (Friday, August 26, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59033-59034]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20498]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2016-0268]

Household Goods Consumer Protection: Application for Exemption;
La Rosa Del Monte Express Inc. (LRDM)

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of application for exemption; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces that La Rosa Del Monte Express, Inc. (LRDM)
has requested an exemption for its specialized ``Small Residential
Shipments'' (SRS) from the consumer protection regulations for the
transportation of household goods (HHG) in interstate commerce. LRDM
requested that its SRS consisting of fewer than 10 items weighing less
than 1,000 pounds total be exempted from the HHG regulations. LRDM
claims that the need for the exemption is made clear by the statutory
Limited Service Exclusion (LSE) for household goods motor carriers.
LRDM believes that an SRS exemption is consistent with the purpose of
the LSE.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 26, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments bearing the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Docket ID FMCSA-2016-0268 using any of the
following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Each submission must include the Agency name and the docket number
for this notice. Note that DOT posts all comments received without
change to www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
included in a comment. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to www.regulations.gov at any time or visit Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The on-line FDMS is available 24 hours each
day, 365 days each year.
    Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning this
notice, please contact Mr. Tom Yager, Chief, FMCSA Driver and Carrier
Operations Division; Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket,
contact Docket Services, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    FMCSA encourages you to participate by submitting comments and
related materials.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
notice (FMCSA-2016-0268), indicate the specific section of this
document to which the comment applies, and provide a reason for
suggestions or recommendations. You may submit your comments and
material online or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only
one of these means. FMCSA recommends that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so the Agency can contact you if it has questions
regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to www.regulations.gov and put
the docket number, ``FMCSA-2016-0268'' in the ``Keyword'' box, and
click ``Search.'' When the new screen appears, click on ``Comment
Now!'' button and type your comment into the text box in the following
screen. Choose whether you are submitting your comment as an individual
or on behalf of a third party and then submit. If you submit your
comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail and would like to know that they
reached the facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard
or envelope. FMCSA will consider all comments and material received
during the comment period and may grant or not grant this application
based on your comments.

III. Legal Basis

    Before operating for hire in interstate commerce, a motor carrier
must obtain commercial registration under 49 U.S.C. 13902 and comply
with the requirements of Sec.  13902(a)(1). To provide transportation
of HHG, a motor carrier must also comply with the requirements of Sec.
13902(a)(2).
    However, under 49 U.S.C. 13541(a), the Secretary of Transportation
``shall exempt a person, class of persons, or a transaction or service
from the application, in whole or in part, of a provision of this part
[part B of subtitle IV of title 49, United States Code, i.e., 49 U.S.C.
chapters 131-149], or use this exemption authority to modify the
application of a provision of this part as it applies to such person,
class, transaction, or service, when the Secretary . . . finds that the
application of that provision--(1) is not necessary to carry out the
transportation policy of section 13101; (2) is not needed to protect
shippers from the abuse of market power or that the transaction or
service is of limited scope; and (3) is in the public interest.''
    Nonetheless, ``The exemption authority under this section may not
be used to relieve a person from the application of, and compliance
with, any law, rule, regulation, standard, or order pertaining to cargo
loss and damages, insurance, [or] safety fitness . . .'' [49 U.S.C.
13541(e)(1)].
    The Secretary's authority to enforce 49 U.S.C. 13902 and 13541 have
been delegated to FMCSA by 49 CFR 1.87(a)(5) and 1.87(a)(3),
respectively. This notice seeks to clarify the

exemption sought by LRDM, in light of the limitations set forth in
Sec.  13541(e)(1).

IV. Background

    A motor carrier engaged in the interstate transportation of
household goods must follow the regulations in 49 CFR part 375. The
term ``household goods motor carrier'' is defined in section 375.103 as
a motor carrier that, in the ordinary course of business of providing
transportation of household goods, offers some or all of the following
additional services: binding and nonbinding estimates; inventorying;
protective packing and unpacking of items at personal residences; and
loading and unloading at personal residences. However, the term HHG
motor carrier excludes any motor carrier providing transportation of
HHGs in containers or trailers that are entirely loaded and unloaded by
an individual (other than an employee or agent of the motor carrier).
This is the LSE provision.

V. Request for Exemption

    LRDM (US DOT # 25982) is a minority-owned motor carrier with its
principal place of business located in Bronx, New York. According to
LRDM, for almost 50 years this company has been a leader in providing
interstate household goods moving and storage services for primarily
minority communities from and between New York, Florida, Connecticut,
Illinois, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, and the Dominican
Republic.
    According to LRDM, in the past several years there has been a need
in communities served by LRDM for an efficient, low-cost, no-frills
shipment service for SRS consisting primarily of fewer than 10 items
weighing a total of no more than 1,000 pounds. Such items include
bicycles, refrigerators, washer/dryers and other similar goods. In
response to this need, LRDM offers an SRS service that it says combines
the efficiency and economy of freight with the safety and professional
service of a traditional HHG move.
    LRDM contends that the HHG regulations hinder its efforts to meet
the needs of the communities it serves. The regulations do not exempt
SRS under the Limited Service Exclusion \1\ (LSE) because LRDM takes
the time and effort to load and unload these small shipments for its
customers. As a result the regulations classify these shipments as
large HHG moves.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The LSE is a statutory provision that pertains to the
definition of ``household goods motor carrier.'' Through the LSE,
Congress specifically excluded certain motor carriers from the
definition of household goods motor carriers, and thus exempted
those carriers from household goods regulations when the carrier
``does not load and unload'' the contents of the containers the
carrier is shipping. Carriers falling under the LSE are not subject
to household goods and consumer protection regulations under FMCSA
regulations parts 375 (for household goods, including form
requirements), 365 (for motor carrier registration requirements) and
387 (for insurance requirements). See 49 U.S.C. 13102(12)(C): see
also 49 CFR 375.103, HHG definition, paragraphs (3) and (4); Limited
Service Exclusion for Household Goods Motor Carriers and Related
Registration Requirements for Brokers, 78 Fed. Reg. 19568 (Apr. 1,
2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    LRDM seeks the ability to offer its customers an option to ship a
limited number of small items at a flat rate that its customers can
afford, free from extra costs and burdens associated with HHG
regulations. LRDM is requesting that its specialized service be exempt
from the HHG requirements under 49 CFR part 375. LRDM asserts that its
SRS warrant an exemption from the application of part 375 because such
an exemption is in the public interest. It claims that the exemption
would further support DOT's transportation policy goals by promoting
safe, economical, and efficient transportation by allowing a variety of
quality and price options to the public.
    To LRDM's knowledge no other carrier/mover, ground, freight, or
otherwise, offers a similar service. These shipments are unique and in
a class of their own; are too large and/or heavy for ground
transportation; and too small to be economical or affordable to be
shipped as freight or through a portable storage container covered
under the LSE.
    LRDM explains that its customers cannot turn to traditional ground
carriers because the SRS shipments far exceed those services' 150 pound
maximum weight for any one parcel. Nor can its customers turn to less-
than-truckload (LTL) freight services which are prohibitively expensive
due to mileage and other freight charges. LTL carriers also require
sophisticated packing with items securely fastened to a pallet or skid.
    LRDM advises that customers cannot turn to the portable storage
container service options. According to LRDM, those services, although
excluded from HHG moving regulations under the LSE, are not made for
SRS and are prohibitively expensive. For example, the cost of shipping
an average sized refrigerator from New York to Miami would cost between
$600-$1,000 by traditional freight service (not including the cost and
time to properly pack and secure the refrigerator on a pallet) and over
$1,800 by a portable storage container service. However, in comparison,
if LRDM was not required to burden its customers with the ``excessive
costs'' and ``unreasonable forms'' associated with HHG regulations
intended for much larger moves, LRDM would be able to offer shipment of
the same merchandise for a flat fee in the range of $125-$500.
    LRDM contends that the intent of the LSE was to give consumers
``access to low-cost transportation services as an alternative to
traditional, full-service, moving companies.'' The intent of its
exemption application is exactly the same; to give consumers access to
an efficient and affordable shipping option for SRS.
    LRDM states that the HHG regulations were not meant to regulate
SRS. LRDM believes the HHG regulations, as they are currently applied
to smaller shipments, are unnecessary and unreasonable. Rather than
being a means of protecting the public from carrier abuses, HHG
regulations burden LRDM's customers with excessive costs and
unreasonably lengthy and confusing forms that undermine DOT's
transportation policy goals.
    LRDM advises that the forms require LRDM to spend time and
resources assisting its customers traverse the maze of paperwork
required by the HHG regulations no matter how small the shipment. These
resources could be used to make SRS shipments more affordable and more
efficient.
    A copy of LRDM's application for the exemption is available for
review in the docket for this notice.

    Issued on: August 18, 2016.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-20498 Filed 8-25-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register: October 28, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 208)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 66301-66302]
[DOCID:fr28oc10-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0404; Airspace Docket No. 10-ASW-7]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Corpus Christi, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends Class E airspace for the Corpus Christi,
TX, area. Additional controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate
new Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAP) at Corpus Christi
International Airport, Corpus Christi, TX. The FAA is taking this
action to enhance the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rule
(IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, January 13, 2011. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR Part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone (817) 321-
7716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On July 27, 2010, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to amend Class E airspace for the Corpus
Christi, TX, area, reconfiguring controlled airspace at Corpus Christi
International Airport (75 FR 43886) Docket No. FAA-2010-0404.
Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.9U dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15,
2010, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
Part 71 by amending Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface for the Corpus Christi, TX, area. The addition of new
SIAPs at Corpus Christi International Airport has made this action
necessary for the safety and management of IFR operations at the
airport.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, section 106, describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends controlled airspace at Corpus Christi International
Airport, Corpus Christi, TX.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

Adoption of the Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR Part 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9U, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15,
2010 is amended as follows:
* * * * *

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface.

* * * * *

ASW TX E5 Corpus Christi, TX [Amended]

Corpus Christi International Airport, TX
    (Lat. 27[deg]46'13'' N., long. 97[deg]30'04'' W.)
Corpus Christi NAS/Truax Field, TX
    (Lat. 27[deg]41'34'' N., long. 97[deg]17'25'' W.)
Port Aransas, Mustang Beach Airport, TX
    (Lat. 27[deg]48'43'' N., long. 97[deg]05'20'' W.)
Rockport, San Jose Island Airport, TX
    (Lat. 27[deg]56'40'' N., long. 96[deg]59'06'' W.)
Rockport, Aransas County Airport, TX
    (Lat. 28[deg]05'10'' N., long. 97[deg]02'37'' W.)
Ingleside, T.P. McCampbell Airport, TX
    (Lat. 27[deg]54'47'' N., long. 97[deg]12'41'' W.)
Robstown, Nueces County Airport, TX
    (Lat. 27[deg]46'43'' N., long. 97[deg]41'26'' W.)
Corpus Christi VORTAC, TX
    (Lat. 27[deg]54'14'' N., long. 97[deg]26'42'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7.5-mile radius of Corpus Christi International Airport and
within 1.4 miles each side of the 200[deg] radial of the Corpus
Christi VORTAC extending from the 7.5-mile radius to 8.5 miles north
of the airport, and within 1.5 miles each side of the 316[deg]
bearing from Corpus Christi International Airport extending from the
7.5-mile radius to 10.1 miles northwest of the airport, and within 2
miles each side of the 179[deg] bearing from Corpus Christi
International Airport extending from the 7.5-mile radius to 14 miles
south of the airport, and within an 8.8-mile radius of Corpus
Christi NAS/Truax Field, and within a 6.3-mile radius of Mustang
Beach Airport, and within a 6.4-mile radius of T.P. McCampbell
Airport, and within a 6.3-mile radius of Nueces County Airport, and
within a 7.6-mile radius of Aransas County Airport, and within 2
miles each side of the 010[deg] bearing from the Aransas County
Airport extending from the 7.6-mile radius to 9.9 miles north of the

airport, and within a 6.5-mile radius of San Jose Island Airport,
and within 8 miles west and 4 miles east of the 327[deg] bearing
from the San Jose Island Airport extending from the airport to 20
miles northwest of the airport, and within 8 miles east and 4 miles
west of the 147[deg] bearing from San Jose Island Airport extending
from the airport to 16 miles southeast of the airport, excluding
that portion more than 12 miles from and parallel to the shoreline.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 19, 2010.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Manager, Operations Support Group ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2010-27261 Filed 10-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 38759]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16903]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 9, 2018.

PLACE: Closed Commission Hearing Room 10800.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners,
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the
matters also may be present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10),
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Stein, as duty officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matters of the closed meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed;
please contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at
(202) 551-5400.

    Dated: August 2, 2018.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-16903 Filed 8-3-18; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P