[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 139 (Friday, July 21, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47026-47029]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15339]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2023-0035; FRL-10594-02-R9]

Finding of Failure to Attain the 1987 24-Hour PM10
Standards; Pinal County, Arizona

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to determine that the West Pinal County, Arizona nonattainment
area (``West Pinal County'' or ``area'') did not attain the 1987 24-
hour national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS or ``standards'')
for particulate matter with a diameter of 10 micrometers or smaller
(PM10) by its December 31, 2022 ``Serious'' area attainment
date. This action is based on the EPA's calculation of the
PM10 design value for the nonattainment area over the 2020-
2022 period, using complete, quality-assured, and certified
PM10 monitoring data. With this final determination that
West Pinal County has failed to attain the PM10 NAAQS by its
attainment date, the State of Arizona is required to submit a revision
to the Arizona state implementation plan (SIP) that, among other
elements, provides for expeditious attainment of the PM10
standards and for a five percent annual reduction in the emissions of
direct PM10 or a PM10 plan precursor pollutant in
the nonattainment area.

DATES: This rule is effective on August 21, 2023.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2023-0035. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance
in a language other than English or if you are a person with a
disability who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you,
please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ashley Graham, Geographic Strategies
and Modeling Section (AIR-2-2), EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
Francisco, CA 94105. By phone:<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Summary of the Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. The EPA's Final Evaluation of Attainment
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Summary of the Proposed Action

    On February 15, 2023, the EPA proposed to determine that the West
Pinal County nonattainment area failed to attain the 1987 24-hour
PM10 NAAQS by its December 31, 2022 ``Serious'' area
attainment date.\1\ For a PM10 nonattainment area classified
as Serious under the CAA, such as the West Pinal County area, section
188(c)(2) of the CAA states that the area's attainment date is ``as
expeditiously as practicable but no later than the end of the tenth
calendar year beginning after the area's designation as
nonattainment.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 88 FR 9812.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consequently, the applicable attainment date for West Pinal County,
designated nonattainment in 2012, was December 31, 2022.\2\ CAA
sections 179(c)(1) and 188(b)(2) require the EPA to determine whether a
PM10 nonattainment area attained the 1987 24-hour
PM10 NAAQS by the area's attainment date within six months
after that date. Generally, this determination of whether an area's air
quality meets the PM10 standards is based upon the most
recent three years of complete, certified data gathered at eligible
monitoring sites in accordance with 40 CFR part 58.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The EPA's proposed rule discusses that on May 31, 2022, the
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality adopted and submitted
the ``2022 Serious Area Particulate Plan for PM-10 for the West
Pinal County Nonattainment Area'', which included a request for an
extension of the December 31, 2022 attainment date pursuant to CAA
section 188(e), but that the EPA has not approved the plan or
attainment date extension. Therefore, the maximum Serious area
attainment date for West Pinal County remains December 31, 2022.
    \3\ 40 CFR part 50, Appendix K, section 2.3(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An area attains the 1987 24-hour PM10 standards of 150
micrograms per cubic meter ([mu]g/m\3\) when the expected number of
days per calendar year with a 24-hour concentration exceeding the
standards, referred to as an ``exceedance'',\4\ averaged over a three-
year period is equal to or less than one.The expected number of
exceedances averaged over a three-year period at any given monitor is
known as the PM10 design value for that site.\5\ The
PM10 design value for the nonattainment area is the highest
design value from a monitor within that area. Three consecutive years
of air quality data are required to show attainment of the
PM10 standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ An exceedance is defined as a daily value that is above the
level of the 24-hour standards, 150 [mu]g/m\3\, after rounding to
the nearest 10 [mu]g/m\3\ (i.e., values ending in five or greater
are to be rounded up). Consequently, a recorded value of 154 [mu]g/
m\3\ would not be an exceedance because it would be rounded to 150
[mu]g/m\3\; whereas, a recorded value of 155 [mu]g/m\3\ would be an
exceedance because it would be rounded to 160 [mu]g/m\3\. See 40 CFR
50.6 and 40 CFR part 50, Appendix K, section 1.0.
    \5\ A design value is calculated using a specific methodology
from monitored air quality data and is used to compare an area's air
quality to a NAAQS. The methodologies for calculating expected
exceedances for the 1987 24-hour PM10 NAAQS are found in
40 CFR part 50, Appendix K, Section 2.1(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Our proposed determination that the West Pinal County area failed
to attain the PM10 NAAQS was based on our review of
preliminary monitoring data for 2020-2022.\6\ As discussed in our
proposal,\7\ while complete 2020 and 2021 data were available, the
deadlines for submission of quarter 4 (October through December) 2022
data and certification of the 2022 data had not yet passed at the time
our proposal was being developed and these data had not yet been
submitted and certified. The 2022 data were therefore considered
incomplete and preliminary. We reviewed such data for all regulatory
monitoring sites measuring PM10 within the West Pinal County
nonattainment area, expressed as a single design value for each site
representing the preliminary average expected exceedances over the
three-year period, 2020-2022. The PM10 data showed that the
design values at multiple monitoring sites were greater than 1.0
estimated annual average exceedances of the 1987 24-hour
PM10 NAAQS. Moreover, the EPA explained that even if there
were zero exceedances in 2022, the 2020-2022 design value would exceed
1.0 at multiple monitoring sites. Consequently, the EPA proposed to
determine, based on complete and quality-assured 2020 and 2021 data and
preliminary 2022 data, that the West Pinal County nonattainment area
did not attain the 1987 24-hour PM10 NAAQS by the applicable
attainment date of December 31, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The EPA also based the determination on the adequacy of the
PM10 monitoring network in the nonattainment area and the
reliability of the data collected by that network (88 FR 9812,
9814). For purposes of our proposal, we reviewed findings from the
EPA's 2019 technical systems audit (TSA), which was the most recent
TSA available at that time. For purposes of this final action, we
also reviewed the findings from the EPA's 2022 TSA (see EPA Region
IX, Technical Systems Audit of the Ambient Air Monitoring Program:
Pinal County Air Quality Control District, September 13-15, 2022
(Final Report dated May 2023)). As with the 2019 TSA, none of the
findings from the 2022 TSA were cause for invalidation of any data
from the relevant monitors and thus the EPA continues to find that
the data collected at the West Pinal monitoring sites are suitable
for determining whether West Pinal County attained the
PM10 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date.
    \7\ 88 FR 9812, 9814.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In our proposal to determine that the West Pinal County area did
not attain the NAAQS by the relevant attainment date, the EPA noted
that the consequence of a final determination is that the State of
Arizona would be required under CAA sections 179(d) and 189(d) to
submit, by December 31, 2023, a revision to the SIP for West Pinal
County.\8\ The SIP revision must, among other elements, demonstrate
expeditious attainment of the standards within the time period provided
under CAA section 179(d), provide for an annual reduction in the
emissions of direct PM10 or a PM10 plan precursor
pollutant within the area of not less than five percent until
attainment, demonstrate reasonable further progress, and include
contingency measures. The requirement for a new attainment
demonstration under CAA section 189(d) also triggers the requirement
for the SIP revision for quantitative milestones under section 189(c)
that are to be achieved every three years until redesignation to
attainment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 88 FR 9812, 9815.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Our proposed rule also discussed that because the EPA has not yet
approved a Moderate or Serious area attainment plan for West Pinal
County, the Moderate and Serious area requirements also remain
outstanding, though the EPA anticipates that Arizona's submission of an
approvable Serious area and 189(d) nonattainment plan would also
satisfy the State's Moderate area nonattainment plan obligations.\9\
The EPA explained that the new attainment date is the date by which
attainment can be achieved as expeditiously as practicable, but no
later than five years from the date of the final determination of
failure to attain, except that the EPA may extend the attainment date
for a period no greater than 10 years from the final determination,
considering the severity of nonattainment and the availability and
feasibility of pollution control measures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    The public comment period for the proposed rule opened on February
15, 2023, the date of its publication in the Federal Register, and
closed on March 17, 2023. During this period, the EPA received comments
from the Sierra Club and from a private citizen.\10\ The Sierra Club
comment letter expressed support for our proposal and urged the EPA to
finalize the determination. The comments from the private citizen
pertain to the processes followed by the Arizona Agricultural Best
Management Practices Committee and are not directly relevant to this
finding of failure to attain the PM10 NAAQS. Copies of the
Sierra Club comment letter and comments from the private citizen are
included in the docket for this final action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Comment submitted March 17, 2023, from Sierra Club to
docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2023-0035, with attached letter dated
March 17, 2023, from Sandy Bahr, Chapter Director, Sierra Club--
Grand Canyon Chapter, to Ashley Graham, Air Planning Office (AIR-2),
EPA Region IX; and comment submitted March 17, 2023, from Dan
Blackson, to docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2023-0035.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. The EPA's Final Evaluation of Attainment

    As discussed in Section I of this document, our proposed
determination that the West Pinal County area failed to attain the 1987
24-hour PM10 NAAQS was based on the EPA's calculation of

the preliminary PM10 design value for the nonattainment area
over the 2020-2022 period. Since the time of the EPA's proposal, the
Pinal County Air Quality Control District has submitted the 2022
quarter 4 data to the EPA's Air Quality System (AQS) database,\11\ and
has certified that the 2022 concentration data are accurate, taking
into consideration the quality assurance findings.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ AQS is the EPA's national repository of ambient air quality
data.
    \12\ Letter dated April 27, 2023, from Josh DeZeeuw, Air Quality
Manager, Pinal County Air Quality Control District, to Dena Vallano,
Manager, Monitoring and Analysis Section, U.S. EPA Region IX,
Subject: ``RE: AQS Data Certification--2022.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For purposes of this final action, we reviewed the final quality-
assured and certified PM10 air quality monitoring data from
the 2020-2022 calendar years. Table 1 of this document provides the
estimated number of PM10 exceedances in each of the years
2020-2022, and final certified 2022 PM10 design values
expressed as a single value representing the average expected
exceedances over the three-year period, 2020-2022, for all regulatory
monitoring sites measuring PM10 within West Pinal County.
These design values are identical to those shown in our proposal and
are greater than 1.0 estimated annual average exceedance of the 1987
24-hour PM10 NAAQS at multiple monitoring sites.
Consequently, the EPA is finalizing a determination that, based on
complete and quality-assured 2020-2022 data, West Pinal County did not
attain the 1987 24-hour PM10 NAAQS by the applicable
attainment date of December 31, 2022.

           Table 1--2020-2022 PM10 Estimated Exceedances for the West Pinal County Nonattainment Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    PM10 estimated exceedances
       Monitoring site          AQS site ID No.  ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       2020            2021            2022          2020-2022
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Casa Grande Downtown.........      04-021-0001-3             1.2               2               0             1.1
Stanfield....................      04-021-3008-3               4               4               2             3.3
Combs........................      04-021-3009-3               0               1               0             0.3
Pinal County Housing (aka          04-021-3011-3               1               3               0             1.3
 Eleven Mile Corner).........
Eloy.........................      04-021-3014-3             2.2               3               0             1.7
Hidden Valley................      04-021-3015-3            59.6              24            14.1            32.6
Maricopa 1405................      04-021-3016-3               3               2               1               2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: EPA AQS Design Value Report, AMP 480, dated May 23, 2023. (User ID: JCARLSTAD, Report Request ID:
  2107794).

IV. Final Action

    In accordance with sections 179(c)(1) and 188(b)(2) of the CAA, the
EPA is taking final action to determine that the West Pinal County
Serious nonattainment area did not attain the 1987 24-hour
PM10 NAAQS by the Serious area attainment date of December
31, 2022. Our determination that West Pinal County failed to attain the
PM10 NAAQS is based on complete, quality-assured, and
certified PM10 monitoring data for the appropriate three-
year period, 2020-2022.
    As a result of our determination of failure to attain the 1987 24-
hour PM10 NAAQS by the Serious area attainment date, Arizona
is required under CAA sections 179(d) and 189(d) to submit a revision
to the SIP for West Pinal County that, among other elements,
demonstrates expeditious attainment of the standards within the time
period provided under CAA section 179(d), and that provides for an
annual reduction in the emissions of direct PM10 or a
PM10 precursor pollutant within the area of not less than
five percent until attainment. The SIP revision required under CAA
sections 179(d) and 189(d) will be due for submittal to the EPA no
later than December 31, 2023.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the PRA because it does not contain any information
collection activities.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action does not impose any requirements on small entities. This action
requires the State to adopt and submit SIP revisions to satisfy CAA
requirements and does not itself directly regulate any small entities.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate of $100 million
or more, as described in UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This action itself
imposes no enforceable duty on any state, local, or tribal governments,
or the private sector. This action determines that West Pinal County
failed to attain the NAAQS by the applicable attainment date. As of the
effective date, this determination triggers existing statutory
timeframes for the state to submit a SIP revision. Such a determination
in and of itself does not impose any federal intergovernmental mandate.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. As there are no federally recognized tribes
within West Pinal

County,\13\ the finding of failure to attain the PM10 NAAQS
does not apply to tribal areas, and the rule would not impose a burden
on Indian reservation lands or other areas where the EPA or an Indian
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction within West Pinal
County. Thus, this rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ A map of Federally-Recognized Tribes in the EPA's Pacific
Southwest (Region IX) is available at https://www.epa.gov/tribal-pacific-sw/map-federally-recognized-tribes-epas-pacific-southwest-region-9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because the effect of this action is to trigger
additional planning requirements under the CAA. This action does not
establish an environmental standard intended to mitigate health or
safety risks.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it
is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by
law, to make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying
and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and
activities on minority populations (people of color and/or Indigenous
peoples) and low-income populations. There is no information in the
record indicating that this action would be inconsistent with the
stated goals of Executive Order 12898 of achieving environmental
justice for people of color, low-income populations, and indigenous
peoples.

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This rule is exempt from the CRA because it is a rule of particular
applicability. This rule makes factual determinations for specific
entities and does not directly regulate any entities. The determination
of a failure to attain by the attainment date and reclassification does
not in itself create any new requirements beyond what is mandated by
the CAA.

L. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 19, 2023. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: July 13, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart D--Arizona

0
2. Section 52.126 is amended by adding paragraph (e) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.126  Control strategy and regulations: Particulate matter.

* * * * *
    (e) Effective August 21, 2023, the EPA has determined that the West
Pinal Serious PM10 nonattainment area failed to attain the
1987 24-hour PM10 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of
December 31, 2022. This determination triggers the requirements of CAA
sections 179(d) and 189(d) for the State of Arizona to submit a
revision to the Arizona SIP for West Pinal to the EPA by December 31,
2023. The SIP revision must, among other elements, demonstrate
expeditious attainment of the 1987 PM10 NAAQS within the
time period provided under CAA section 179(d) and provide for an annual
reduction in the emissions of direct PM10 or a
PM10 plan precursor pollutant within the area of not less
than five percent until attainment.

[FR Doc. 2023-15339 Filed 7-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24157-24159]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9673]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0286; Airspace Docket No. 11-AWP-22]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Establishment of Area Navigation (RNAV) Routes;
Southwestern United States

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish two new low-altitude RNAV
routes, designated T-306 and T-310, in southwestern United States. The
new routes would expand the availability of RNAV within the National
Airspace System (NAS) and provide substitute

route segments for portions of VOR Federal airways V-16 and V-202.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 7, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2012-
0286 and Airspace Docket No. 11-AWP-22 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace, Regulations
and ATC Procedures Group, Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2012-0286 and Airspace Docket No. 11-AWP-22) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to FAA Docket No. FAA-2012-0286 and Airspace Docket No. 11-AWP-22.''
The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. An
informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at
the office of the Western Service Center, Operations Support Group,
Federal Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to establish two new low altitude RNAV
routes in southwestern United States. Route T-306 would extend between
Los Angeles, CA, and El Paso, TX; and route T-310 would extend between
Tucson, AZ, and Truth or Consequences, NM. The routes would expand the
availability of RNAV within the NAS and provide substitute route
segments for portions of VOR Federal airways V-16 and V-202 that will
be affected by the scheduled decommissioning of the Cochise, NM, VORTAC
in the Fall of 2012.
    This action would enhance en route navigation for users, increase
the efficiency of the NAS and expand the use of RNAV within the NAS.
    RNAV routes are published in paragraph 6011 of FAA Order 7400.9V
dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15, 2011, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The RNAV routes listed in
this document would be subsequently published in the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under Department of Transportation (DOT)
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it modifies the route structure as required to preserve the safe and
efficient flow of air traffic.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures,'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order
7400.9V, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, Dated August 9,
2011, and effective September 15, 2011, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6011 United States area navigation routes

T-306, Los Angeles, CA (LAX) to El Paso, TX (ELP) [New]

Los Angeles, CA (LAX)                          VORTAC                        (Lat. 33[deg]55'59'' N., long. 118[deg]25'55'' W.)
PRADO, CA                                      INT                           (Lat. 33[deg]55'23'' N., long. 117[deg]47'02'' W.)
Paradise, CA (PDZ)                             VORTAC                        (Lat. 33[deg]55'06'' N., long. 117[deg]31'48'' W.)
SETER, CA                                      INT                           (Lat. 33[deg]54'04'' N., long. 117[deg]06'33'' W.)
BANDS, CA                                      INT                           (Lat. 33[deg]53'23'' N., long. 116[deg]50'58'' W.)
Palm Springs, CA (PSP)                         VORTAC                        (Lat. 33[deg]52'12'' N., long. 116[deg]25'47'' W.)
Blythe, CA (BLH)                               VORTAC                        (Lat. 33[deg]35'46'' N., long. 114[deg]45'41'' W.)
Buckeye, AZ (BXK)                              VORTAC                        (Lat. 33[deg]27'12'' N., long. 112[deg]49'29'' W.)
PERKY, AZ                                      INT                           (Lat. 33[deg]26'45'' N., long. 112[deg]28'23'' W.)
Phoenix, AZ (PXR)                              VORTAC                        (Lat. 33[deg]25'59'' N., long. 111[deg]58'13'' W.)
TOTEC, AZ                                      INT                           (Lat. 32[deg]49'36'' N., long. 111[deg]38'32'' W.)
Tucson, AZ (TUS)                               VORTAC                        (Lat. 32[deg]05'43'' N., long. 110[deg]54'53'' W.)
NOCHI, AZ                                      WP                            (Lat. 32[deg]02'00'' N., long. 109[deg]45'30'' W.)
ANIMA, AZ                                      INT                           (Lat. 31[deg]54'58'' N., long. 108[deg]30'51'' W.)
DARCE, NM                                      INT                           (Lat. 31[deg]53'12'' N., long. 108[deg]13'21'' W.)
Columbus, NM (CUS)                             VOR/DME                       (Lat. 31[deg]49'09'' N., long. 107[deg]34'28'' W.)
El Paso, TX (ELP)                              VORTAC                        (Lat. 31[deg]48'57'' N., long. 106[deg]16'55'' W.)

T-310, Tucson, AZ (TUS) to Truth or Consequences, NM (TCS) [New]

Tucson, AZ (TUS)                               VORTAC                        (Lat. 32[deg]05'43'' N., long. 110[deg]54'53'' W.)
SULLI, AZ                                      INT                           (Lat. 31[deg]56'04'' N., long. 110[deg]34'16'' W.)
MESCA, AZ                                      INT                           (Lat. 31[deg]53'38'' N., long. 110[deg]29'08'' W.)
NOCHI, AZ (new)                                WP                            (Lat. 31[deg]59'58'' N., long. 108[deg]30'51'' W.)
San Simon, AZ (SSO)                            VORTAC                        (Lat. 32[deg]16'09'' N., long. 109[deg]15'47'' W.)
Silver City, NM (SVC)                          VORTAC                        (Lat. 32[deg]38'16'' N., long. 108[deg]09'40'' W.)
Truth or Consequences, NM (TCS)                VORTAC                        (Lat. 33[deg]16'57'' N., long. 107[deg]16'50'' W.)

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 16, 2012.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace, Regulations and ATC Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2012-9673 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P