[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 213 (Thursday, November 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 76625]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26574]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4284-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2016-0001]

Georgia; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Georgia (FEMA-4284-DR), dated October 8, 2016, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: October 15, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident
period for this disaster is closed effective October 15, 2016.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2016-26574 Filed 11-2-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


                            ENGINEERING EVALUATION                                         Date: 06/20/18				Project Number: 18-181 Facility Name: Meridian Manufacturing		Facility ID: 11-01-029 Engineer: Gary Smith				FO: 3 Permit Number(s):  Project Description:  Meridian Manufacturing (MM) is a company that makes agricultural bins, seeders, fuel tanks and other equipment. The processes are primarily metal cutting, welding and painting. The facility is currently major for Title V and HAPs. They are subject to NESHAP MMMM for surface coating. Meridian wants to take limits to get out of Title V. This includes VOC and HAP limits for painting. When the facility becomes minor for HAPs they will no longer be subject to NESHAP MMMM. They will become subject to NESHAP 6X for area sources. This will require the 6X language to be in the permits for painting, machining and welding. MM wants to leave open the option to use paints and metals with the MFHAPs.  SIC/NAICS: 3523, 3443/333111

Pollutant(s) Emitted: VOC, PM, HAP

Compliance Status: 14 entries in database. Two are open, this project will address those issues.

Applicability Determination:  One Source Determination:           Is there another operation that should be considered part of this facility? 	No           Which facility(s)/facility ID(s)?:				NA           Details of determination or reference to when determination was made: NA          	  NSR-PSD-NAA:           Attainment?:						Yes           Twenty-eight listed source?:				No, ag equipment maker            "Major" source?:						No           "Major" pollutants:					NA           Pollutants "major" for this project:			none            Title V:  "Major" source?:						No, this project makes them minor  "Major" pollutants:					NA            NSPS: This facility is not subject to NSPS because there are no applicable subparts.         NESHAP:  This facility is subject to NESHAP subpart XXXXXX, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Area Source Standards for Nine Metal Fabrication and Finishing Source Categories. Before this project the facility was a major source of HAPs and subject to NESHAP MMMM for surface coating. MM is taking advantage of the new policy that allows them to take limits and get out of major source NESHAPS.  Iowa Administrative Code (IAC):           567 IAC 22.1(1)		Permit required for construction of any equipment           567 IAC 23.3(2)"a"	0.1 gr/dscf           567 IAC 23.4(13)		0.01 gr/dscf PM for paint booths           567 IAC 23.4(6)		0.05 gr/dscf PM for metal processing

Dispersion Modeling: Checked with the dispersion modeling section and the changes should be a net positive for modeling. Therefore no modeling is required.

Compliance Demonstration: Modifications are to the material usage limits so no additional testing is required.  Emission Limits:  EP 1:	PM = 0.01 gr/dscf, 40% opacity EP 2:	PM = 0.01 gr/dscf, 40% opacity  EP 3:	PM = 0.01 gr/dscf, 40% opacity EP 4:	PM = 0.01 gr/dscf, 40% opacity EP 5:	PM = 0.01 gr/dscf, 40% opacity EP 6:	PM = 0.01 gr/dscf, 40% opacity EP 10:	PM = 0.01 gr/dscf, 40% opacity EP 23:	PM = 0.05 gr/dscf, 0.514 lb/hr, 40% opacity EP 30:	PM = 0.1 gr/dscf, 2.1 lb/hr 		PM10 = 2.1 lb/hr EP 31:	PM = 0.1 gr/dscf, 2.1 lb/hr 		PM10 = 2.1 lb/hr EP 32:	PM = 0.1 gr/dscf, 2.1 lb/hr 		PM10 = 2.1 lb/hr EP 33:	PM = 0.1 gr/dscf, 2.1 lb/hr 		PM10 = 2.1 lb/hr EP 34:	PM = 0.1 gr/dscf, 2.1 lb/hr 		PM10 = 2.1 lb/hr

EP PM10 tpy VOC tpy SHAP tpy  THAP tpy

1 3.38 90.4 3.8 4.8

2 3.38

3 3.38

4 3.38

5 3.38

6 3.38

10 1.5 1.1 1.1 1.1

23 2.25

30 8.0

31 8.0

32 4.0

33 4.0

34 4.0

Total 52.03 91.5 4.9 5.9

Operating Limits:  Spray booths limited to 40,000 gallons/yr paint @ 4.52 lb/gal VOC, 0.19 lb/gal SHAP, 0.24 lb/gal THAP. Limited to 700 gal/yr solvent @ 7.5 lb/gal. NESHAP 6X monitoring and work practice requirements.  Welding areas limited in the hours of operation due to previous modeling. NESHAP 6X work practices and opacity monitoring. Plasma Table limited in the hours of operation due to previous modeling. NESHAP 6X work practices.

Emission Calculations:	 40,000(4.52)/2000 = 90.4 tpy VOC 40,000(0.19)/2000 = 3.8 tpy SHAP 40,000(0.24)/2000 = 4.8 tpy THAP 700(7.5)/2000 = 2.63 tpy VOC, SHAP, THAP Total = 90.4 + 2.63 = 93.03 tpy VOC, 3.8 + 2.63 = 6.43 tpy SHAP, 4.8 + 2.63 = 7.43 tpy THAP Welding (1, 2): 2.1 lb/hr(21 hr/day)(365)/2000 = 8.0 tpy x 2 = 16 tpy Welding (3, 4, 5): 2.1 lb/hr(10.5 hr/day)(365)/2000 = 4.0 tpy x 3 = 12.1 tpy Powder coat: 25 lb/hr(8760)/2000 = 109.5 tpy  assume 1% emitted as VOC: 109.5(0.01) = 1.1 tpy VOC

Facility-wide Emissions Inventory Completed?			No

Draft Permits:

Draft Permit(s) sent to Facility?	Yes, 7/9/18 Significant Comments: No comments

Attachments to Evaluation:    	Emission Calculations    	Facility Wide Emissions Calculations    	Dispersion Modeling Memo    	Correspondence (emails or letters)    	Phone log(s)    	Process Research    	Timeline    	Regulations    	Stack Test(s)    		Other Supporting Documentation    	Compliance Work Request


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 7, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9501-9502]
[FR Doc No: 2017-02485]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 201, 801, and 1100

[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-2002]
RIN 0910-AH19

Clarification of When Products Made or Derived From Tobacco Are
Regulated as Drugs, Devices, or Combination Products; Amendments to
Regulations Regarding ``Intended Uses''; Delayed Effective Date

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the memorandum of January 20, 2017, from
the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, entitled
``Regulatory Freeze Pending Review,'' this action delays the effective
date of the final rule (``Clarification of When Products Made or
Derived From Tobacco Are Regulated as Drugs, Devices, or Combination
Products; Amendments to Regulations Regarding `Intended Uses' ''),
which published on January 9, 2017, from February 8, 2017, until March
21, 2017.

DATES: The effective date of the rule amending 21 CFR Chapter I
published at 82 FR 2193 on January 9, 2017 is delayed until March 21,
2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Center for Tobacco Products, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Document Control Center,
Bldg. 71, Rm. G335, Silver

Spring, MD 20993-0002, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 9, 2017, the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) issued a final rule describing the
circumstances in which products made or derived from tobacco are
regulated as drugs, devices, or combination products. The rule also
amended the ``intended use'' regulations found at 21 CFR 201.128 and
801.4. The rule was published with an effective date of February 8,
2017.
    FDA bases this action on the memorandum of January 20, 2017 (82 FR
8346), from the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, entitled
``Regulatory Freeze Pending Review.'' That memorandum directed the
heads of Executive Departments and Agencies to temporarily postpone for
60 days from the date of the memorandum the effective dates of all
regulations that had been published in the Federal Register but had not
yet taken effect, for the purpose of ``reviewing questions of fact,
law, and policy they raise.'' FDA, therefore, is delaying the effective
date of the rule that published on January 9, 2017 (82 FR 2193), to
March 21, 2017.
    To the extent that 5 U.S.C. 553 applies to this action, it is
exempt from notice and comment because it constitutes a rule of
procedure under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A). Alternatively, the Agency's
implementation of this action without opportunity for public comment,
effective immediately upon publication today in the Federal Register,
is based on the good cause exceptions in 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and (d)(3).
Seeking public comment is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to
the public interest. The delay in the effective date until March 21,
2017, is necessary to give Agency officials the opportunity for further
review and consideration of the new regulation, consistent with the
memorandum described previously. Given the imminence of the effective
date and the brief length of the extension of the effective date,
seeking prior public comment on this delay would have been
impracticable, as well as contrary to the public interest in the
orderly issue and implementation of regulations.

    Dated: February 2, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-02485 Filed 2-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: November 8, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 216)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 65414-65416]
[DOCID:fr08no06-11]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2006-0836; FRL-8240-6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the state of Iowa. This revision will update Code of
Federal Regulation (CFR) amendment dates, make a clarification to the
state air quality rules for laundry activities listed under
construction permit exemptions, and adopt the American Meteorological
Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model (AERMOD).
    The SIP revisions are necessary for consistency with Federal
regulations.

DATES: This direct final rule will be effective January 8, 2007,
without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by December
8, 2006. If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing
the public that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2006-0836, by one of the following methods:
    1. http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for

submitting comments.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail: Heather Hamilton, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City,
Kansas 66101.
    5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to Heather
Hamilton, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development
Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-
2006-0836. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through http://www.regulations.gov
 or e-mail information that you consider to be CBI

or otherwise protected. The http://www.regulations.gov website is an

``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be

automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some

information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov
 or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection

Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street,
Kansas City, Kansas 66101. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8 to 4:30 excluding Federal
holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine these documents
should make an appointment with the office at least 24 hours in
advance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Hamilton at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
by e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This section provides
additional information by addressing the following questions:

What is a SIP?
What is the Federal approval process for a SIP?
What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me?
What is being addressed in this document?
Have the requirements for approval of a SIP been met?
What action is EPA taking?

What is a SIP?

    Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop
air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state
air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards
established by EPA. These ambient standards are established under
section 109 of the CAA, and they currently address six criteria
pollutants. These pollutants are: carbon monoxide,

nitrogen dioxide, ozone, lead, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide.
    Each state must submit these regulations and control strategies to
us for approval and incorporation into the Federally-enforceable SIP.
    Each Federally-approved SIP protects air quality primarily by
addressing air pollution at its point of origin. These SIPs can be
extensive, containing state regulations or other enforceable documents
and supporting information such as emission inventories, monitoring
networks, and modeling demonstrations.

What is the Federal approval process for a SIP?

    In order for state regulations to be incorporated into the
Federally-enforceable SIP, states must formally adopt the regulations
and control strategies consistent with state and Federal requirements.
This process generally includes a public notice, public hearing, public
comment period, and a formal adoption by a state-authorized rulemaking
body.
    Once a state rule, regulation, or control strategy is adopted, the
state submits it to us for inclusion into the SIP. We must provide
public notice and seek additional public comment regarding the proposed
Federal action on the state submission. If adverse comments are
received, they must be addressed prior to any final Federal action by
us.
    All state regulations and supporting information approved by EPA
under section 110 of the CAA are incorporated into the Federally-
approved SIP. Records of such SIP actions are maintained in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) at title 40, part 52, entitled ``Approval and
Promulgation of Implementation Plans.'' The actual state regulations
which are approved are not reproduced in their entirety in the CFR
outright but are ``incorporated by reference,'' which means that we
have approved a given state regulation with a specific effective date.

What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me?

    Enforcement of the state regulation before and after it is
incorporated into the Federally-approved SIP is primarily a state
responsibility. However, after the regulation is Federally approved, we
are authorized to take enforcement action against violators. Citizens
are also offered legal recourse to address violations as described in
section 304 of the CAA.

What is being addressed in this document?

    EPA is approving revisions to the SIP for the State of Iowa. These
revisions became state effective on August 23, 2006.
    A revision is being made to amend paragraph 22.1(1)``b'' (New or
reconstructed major sources of hazardous air pollutants) to update the
reference to the Federal rule in 40 CFR part 63 from April 15, 2002, to
April 22, 2004. A clarification is being made to the exemption from
construction permitting ((22.1(2)``x''(5)) for laundry activities
located at stationary sources. The revision clarifies that laundry
activities using dry cleaning equipment or steam boilers are not
exempt.
    A revision to amend subrule 22.4(1) updates the reference to EPA's
modeling guidelines in 40 CFR part 51, Appendix W. This revision
changes the Appendix W reference from August 12, 1996, to November 9,
2005. The main purpose of the update is to include the promulgation of
the American Meteorological Society/Environment Protection Agency
Regulatory Model (AERMOD), which replaces the ISC3 model. Federal
regulation requires that AERMOD be implemented by December 9, 2006.
    The State of Iowa also submitted revisions to the Iowa Operating
Permits program; however, minor corrections need to be made and
approved by the Environmental Protection Commission. Therefore, EPA
will not act on the Operating Permits program revisions at this time.

Have the requirements for approval of a SIP been met?

    The state submittal has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submittal also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In
addition, as explained above and in more detail in the technical
support document which is part of this docket, the revision meets the
substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.

What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is approving revisions to the SIP submitted by the state of
Iowa. The Iowa Administrative Code, Chapter 22, subrule 22.1(1)``b'' is
changed to update the CFR amendment dates; subrule 22.1(2)``x''(5) is
amended to clarify an exemption from construction permitting, and
22.4(1) amends the SIP to include AERMOD as the preferred guideline
model.
    We are processing this action as a direct final action because the
revisions make routine changes to the existing rules which are
noncontroversial. Therefore, we do not anticipate any adverse comments.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on part of this rule
and if that part can be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may
adopt as final those parts of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA.
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of

Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to
disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 8, 2007. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: October 31, 2006.
John B. Askew,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.

0
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart Q--Iowa

0
2. In Sec.  52.820 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entries for 567-22.1 and 567-22.4 to read as follows:

Sec.  52.820  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                                              EPA-Approved Iowa Regulations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            State
             Iowa citation                          Title              effective date              EPA approval date                    Explanation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Iowa Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Commission [567]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      * * * * * * *
                                                            Chapter 22--Controlling Pollution
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
567-22.1..............................  Permits Required for New or           8/23/06  11/8/2006, [insert FR page number where
                                         Existing Stationary Sources.                   the document begins].

                                                                      * * * * * * *
567-22.4..............................  Special Requirements for              8/23/06  11/8/2006, [insert FR page number where
                                         Major Stationary Sources                       the document begins].
                                         Located in Areas Designated
                                         Attainment or Unclassified
                                         (PSD).

                                                                      * * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
 [FR Doc. E6-18845 Filed 11-7-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 24, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3263-3268]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01228]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-9418; Product Identifier 2016-NE-23-AD; Amendment
39-19167; AD 2018-02-14]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Honeywell International Inc. Turboprop
and Turboshaft Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Honeywell International Inc. (Honeywell) TPE331 turboprop and TSE331
turboshaft engines. This AD was prompted by reports that combustion
chamber case assemblies have cracked and ruptured. This AD requires
inspection of the affected combustion chamber case assembly,
replacement of those assemblies found cracked, and removal of affected
assemblies on certain TPE331 and TSE331 engines. We are issuing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective February 28, 2018.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of February 28,
2018.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Honeywell International Inc., 111 S 34th Street, Phoenix, AZ
85034-2802; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet: https://myaerospace.honeywell.com/wps/portal. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on
the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2016-9418.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9418; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Document Operations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Costa, Aerospace Engineer, Los
Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA 90712-4137;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Honeywell TPE331
turboprop and TSE331 turboshaft engines. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on April 19, 2017 (82 FR 18402). The NPRM was prompted
by reports of three accidents involving combustion chamber case
assembly ruptures. Investigations have shown numerous cracked and
ruptured combustion chamber case assemblies resulting from high
stresses in the as-designed weld joints and contributing factors due to
repair weld quality, poor maintenance and inspection practices, and
cycles-in-service. The NPRM proposed to require inspection, replacement
of the affected combustion chamber case assemblies, and removal of
affected assemblies on certain TPE331 turboprop and TSE331 turboshaft
engines. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Revise Internet Address

    Honeywell requested that its internet address be revised.
    We agree. We revised the internet address as requested by
Honeywell.

Request To Revise Service Information

    Honeywell requested that we revise the service bulletins in this AD
to reference the latest revisions.
    We agree. We revised the references in this AD to Honeywell Service
Bulletins (SBs) TPE331-72-2218; TPE331-72-2235; and TPE331-72-2244 from
Revision 1 to Revision 2. However, we did not update the references to
the SB that is incorporated by reference since this SB is already at
the latest revision.

Request To Revise Discussion of Proposed AD Requirements

    Honeywell requested that we reference the TSE331 turboshaft engine
in the ``Proposed AD Requirements'' section of this final rule.
    We partially agree. We agree that we inadvertently omitted mention
of the TSE331 turboshaft engines from the ``Proposed AD Requirements''
section in the NPRM. We disagree with making a change to this final
rule because the ``Proposed AD Requirements'' section does not exist in
this final rule AD. We did not change this AD.

Request To Revise Discussion of Removal and Replacement Times

    Honeywell requested changes to the Differences Between This
Proposed AD and the Service Information section contained within the
NPRM, recommending revision of the removal and replacement statement.
Honeywell's referenced service bulletins in the NPRM recommend a
revised compliance calendar deadline for certain redesigned combustion
chamber case assemblies. Honeywell indicated the compliance deadline is
March 31, 2021, for all redesigned combustion chamber case assemblies.
    We partially agree. We agree it would be appropriate to reference
this calendar deadline in this discussion within the

NPRM. We do not agree to revise this final rule because this discussion
does not exist in this final rule. Further explanation in this final
rule is not necessary. We did not change this final rule.

Request To Revise Number of Affected Engines

    Honeywell indicated its records show 11,280 engines have been
shipped with suspect combustion chamber case assemblies. Honeywell,
therefore, requested we revise the number of engines accordingly within
the Costs of Compliance section in this final rule.
    We disagree. We estimate costs based on the number of affected
engines in the U.S. Registry. We estimate 50% of the engines Honeywell
shipped are in the U.S. Registry. We did not change this final rule.

Request To Revise Applicability To Include TPE331-12B Engine

    Honeywell requested we revise the applicability of this AD to
include the TPE331-12B engine. Honeywell commented this engine was used
in military operations but now is operated commercially and has
experienced similar cracks in its combustion chamber case assembly.
    We partially agree. The combustion chamber case assemblies
installed on these engines are subject to the same cracking as those
installed on the other affected TPE331 engines. However, in the
interest of safety, we will proceed to publish this final rule without
adding the TPE331-12B engine model. We will consider further rulemaking
action to incorporate the TPE331-12B engines.

Request To Revise Compliance Time

    Honeywell, Council 331 (a TPE331 operators and maintenance group),
and an individual operator requested a change to repetitive compliance
time for the visual inspection of the combustion chamber case assembly
and suggested a specified calendar date. The commenters noted
compliance at 50 and 400 hours would not align with the fuel nozzle
inspection interval and requested clarification.
    We partially agree. We interpret Honeywell's comment on the 50-hour
initial compliance interval as a request to clarify the intent of the
50-hour interval rather than as a request to change this AD. We used
the 50-hour compliance interval and not a calendar date because a grace
period is necessary to give operators time to comply with this AD.
    We agree the repetitive combustion chamber case assembly
inspections should be aligned with the fuel nozzle inspections not to
exceed 450 hours. We revised this AD to indicate repetitive visual
inspection of the combustion chamber case assembly be performed before
accumulating 450 hours since last fuel nozzle inspection.

Request To Note Ruptures of Additional Combustion Chamber Case
Assemblies

    Honeywell requested this final rule note that combustion chamber
case assembly ruptures occurred on parts other than those part numbers
(P/Ns) mentioned in paragraph (g) of this AD. Honeywell indicated
ruptures have occurred on other P/N combustor chamber case assemblies.
    We agree. Combustion chamber case assembly ruptures have occurred
with other configurations other than those P/Ns mentioned in paragraph
(g) of this AD. We agree the public should be aware of combustion
chamber case assembly cracks that may propagate to failure or rupture
if not properly inspected and maintained. We reviewed other combustion
chamber case assembly configurations and determined the risk of rupture
for P/N 3101668-x (``x'' denotes all dash numbers) is lower than those
configurations identified in paragraph (g)(2) of this AD. We have
adequately addressed more frequent inspections and removal from service
of high risk and cracked combustion chamber case assemblies. We did not
change this AD.

Request To Remove All Combustion Chamber Case Assemblies From Service

    Honeywell requested that we revise the Compliance section of this
AD to require removal from service, at the next removal from the
engine, all combustion chamber case assemblies other than the P/Ns
listed in paragraph (g)(2) of this AD. In addition, Honeywell has
performed a Continued Airworthiness Assessment, in accordance with
Advisory Circular 39-8 and determined replacement of the combustion
chamber case assemblies with redesigned assemblies is the only
corrective action that would return the product to the level of safety
intended by the original basis of certification.
    We disagree. This AD requires corrective actions that reduce the
probability of combustion chamber case rupture. We identified in
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD certain combustion chamber case assemblies
with high stresses in the specified weld joint that showed higher
incidents of cracking and rupture, a short crack propagation life, and
poor crack detectability compared to other combustion chamber case
assemblies. These combustion chamber case assemblies require
replacement within the AD's specified compliance time. We did not
change this AD.

Request To Clarify Identity of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
Holder

    Honeywell requested we clarify that Honeywell is not the holder of
the STC referenced in this AD.
    We agree. Indication of ownership of the subject STC may assist
owners to identify the engine modification. We changed this AD by
identifying National Flight Services Inc. as the holder of the STC
SE383CH.

Request To Clarify Engines That Have Been Modified With Increased P3
Pressures

    Honeywell requested we clarify paragraph (g) of this AD to describe
how operators would determine that their engines have been modified
with increased P3 pressures not under STC SE383CH.
    We agree that operators may be unable to determine that their
engines have been modified with increased P3 case pressures. Therefore,
we will limit the applicability of paragraph (g) of this AD to the
referenced STC. We revised paragraph (g) of this AD by removing the
phrase ``modified with increased P3 pressures, including, but not
limited to . . .'' from this paragraph.''

Request To Limit Weld Repairs

    Honeywell requested we revise the compliance section of this AD to
disallow any weld repairs on any combustion chamber case assemblies
that are affected by this AD.
    We partially agree. We agree a weld repair is a sensitive process
that may affect the fatigue life of the combustion chamber case
assembly. We agree not to allow use of any weld repair procedures dated
before the effective date of this AD. We will assess repair procedures
of certain combustion chamber case assemblies with lower stresses on a
case-by-case basis. We did not change this AD.

Request To Prohibit Installation of Weld-Repaired Combustion Chamber
Case Assemblies

    Honeywell requested the compliance section be revised to prohibit
installation of any applicable combustion chamber case assembly which
has been weld repaired.
    We do not agree. In paragraphs (g)(2), (h) and (i) of this AD, we
identified the combustion chamber case configurations with the highest
risk of rupture. Prohibiting installation of all welded combustion
chamber case assemblies is unnecessary because they

do not all create the same unsafe condition. We did not change this AD.

Request To Add Further Information on Combustion Chamber Assembly
Failures

    Perimeter Aviation LP (Perimeter) requested we add information to
this AD regarding the number of failures of combustion chamber
assemblies with or without the one-piece bleed pad. Perimeter requested
further information on how these failures relate to the P/N 3101668-12
combustion chamber assembly.
    We agree. We note that five of the six combustion chamber case
assemblies that ruptured were assemblies without the one-piece bleed
pad. P/N 3101668-x has the one-piece bleed pad with P3 boss, which
demonstrated significantly reduced cracking between the P3 and bleed
boss; therefore, this combustion chamber case assembly is not affected
by this AD. No further changes are needed. We did not change this AD.

Request To Add More Frequent Inspections

    Hancock Enterprises, Inc. and Council 331 requested we require more
frequent visual inspections and/or fluorescent penetrant inspections
during the combustion chamber case assembly's removal. They recommended
allowing the assembly be re-installed and replaced with an updated part
at the next overhaul or continuous airworthiness maintenance. Council
331 cited the non-destructive testing experience of these combustion
chamber case assemblies.
    We disagree. We do not believe more frequent inspections would
maintain an adequate level of safety. Allowing the most difficult-to-
inspect and highest risk combustion chamber case assemblies back into
service would allow excessive risk. Although we agree more frequent
visual inspections would improve the probability of detecting cracks,
thereby reducing the risk of a rupture, the FAA believes the
probability of crack detection for a visual inspection of an installed
combustion chamber case assembly is generally low and will not maintain
an acceptable level of safety. We did not change this AD.

Request To Add Terminating Action

    Council 331 requested that compliance with one of the service
bulletins listed in ``Other Related Service Information'' provide
terminating action for the proposed AD. Terminating action in the AD
will provide added incentive to operators in removing from service
suspect parts with a documented history of failure. Council 331
commented that, as drafted, the new redesign combustion chamber case
assembly does not eliminate the AD's compliance requirements. There
have been no known failures of the new redesign combustion chamber case
assembly.
    We partially agree. We agree lower stress and improved reliability
should eliminate the need for repetitive visual inspection. We also
agree to limiting the ADs applicability to only the suspect
configurations should provide adequate safety. We therefore changed the
Applicability section of this AD to refer only to engines ``with
combustion chamber case assemblies, part numbers (P/Ns) 869728-x,
893973-x, 3101668-x, and 3102613-x, where ``x'' denotes any dash
number, installed.''
    We do not agree it is necessary to specify terminating action in
this AD. This AD only applies to the specified engine models with the
specific P/N combustor chamber case assemblies installed. Therefore, a
terminating action for new combustor chamber assemblies is unnecessary.
We did not change this AD.

Revision to Engine Operating Time Limit

    After further review, we revised the engine operating time limit in
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD to ``not to exceed 3,700 hours time-in-
service since last hot section inspection.'' This is equivalent to
removal of the combustion chamber case assemblies at their next removal
from the engine, which was specified in the NPRM.

Revision to Installation Prohibition

    After further review, we revised the Installation Prohibition,
paragraph (i) of this AD, to limit this prohibition against
installation of affected combustion chamber case assemblies in certain
engine models. This clarification makes this prohibition consistent
with paragraph (g)(2) of this AD.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this final rule with the changes described previously and minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     [Agr]re consistent with the intent that was proposed in
the NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Honeywell SB TPE331-72-2178, Revision 0, dated May 3,
2011. Honeywell SB TPE331-72-2178 describe procedures for inspection
and removal of the affected combustion chamber case assemblies
installed on all affected engines except for the TPE331-12B engine.
This service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Other Related Service Information

    Honeywell has also issued SBs TPE331-72-2228, Revision 0, dated
June 12, 2014; TPE331-72-2230, Revision 0, dated June 19, 2014; TPE331-
72-2218, Revision 2, dated February 18, 2017; TPE331-72-2244, Revision
2, dated March 20 2017; TPE331-72-2235, Revision 2, dated February 18,
2017; TPE331-72-2281, Revision 0, dated July 22, 2016; TPE331-72-2294,
Revision 0, dated December 22, 2016; and TSE331-72-2245, Revision 0,
dated November 11, 2016. These SBs provide guidance on replacement of
the affected combustion chamber case assemblies.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 5,644 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
           Action                 Labor cost       Parts cost          Cost per product            operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On-wing inspection..........  1 work-hour x $85              $0  $85 per inspection..........  $479,740 per
                               per hour = $85.                                                  inspection
                                                                                cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the results of the proposed inspection.
We estimate that 158 engines will need this replacement during the
first year of inspection.

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                    Action                                 Labor cost               Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement of the combustion chamber assembly  1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85         $15,000         $15,085
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to engines, propellers, and
associated appliances to the Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2018-02-14 Honeywell International Inc. (Type Certificate previously
held by AlliedSignal Inc., Garrett Engine Division; Garrett Turbine
Engine Company; and AiResearch Manufacturing Company of Arizona):
Amendment 39-19167; Docket No. FAA-2016-9418; Product Identifier
2016-NE-23-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective February 28, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Honeywell International Inc. (Honeywell)
TPE331-1, -2, -2UA, -3U, -3UW, -5, -5A, -5AB, -5B, -6, -6A, -8, -10,
-10AV, -10GP, -10GT, -10N, -10P, -10R, -10T, -10U, -10UA, -10UF, -
10UG, -10UGR, -10UR, and -11U, -12JR, -12UA, -12UAR, -12UHR, -25AA,
-25AB, -25DA, -25DB, -25FA, -43A, -43BL, -47A, -55B, and -61A model
turboprop engines, and TSE331-3U model turboshaft engines with
combustion chamber case assemblies, part numbers (P/Ns) 869728-x,
893973-x, 3101668-x, and 3102613-x, where ``x'' denotes any dash
number, installed.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7240, Turbine Engine
Combustion Section.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports that combustion chamber case
assemblies have cracked and ruptured. We are issuing this AD to
prevent failure of the combustion chamber case assembly. The unsafe
condition, if not addressed, could result in failure of the
combustion chamber, in-flight shutdown, and reduced control of the
airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    (1) For all affected engines:
    (i) Inspect all accessible areas of the combustion chamber case
assembly, focusing on the weld joints, before accumulating 450 hours
in service since last fuel nozzle inspection or within 50 hours in
service after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
    (ii) Do the inspection in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraphs 3.B.(1) through 3.B.(2), in Honeywell
Service Bulletin TPE331-72-2178, Revision 0, dated May 3, 2011.
    (iii) Thereafter, repeat this inspection during scheduled fuel
nozzle inspections at intervals not to exceed 450 hours.
    (2) For TPE331-3U, -3UW, -5, -5A, -5AB, -5B, -6, and -6A engines
with combustion chamber case assemblies, P/Ns 869728-1, 869728-3, or
893973-5, installed, and without the one-piece bleed pad with P3
boss; and for TPE331-1, -2, and -2UA engines modified by National
Flight Services, Inc., supplemental type certificate (STC) SE383CH,
remove the combustion chamber case assembly from service at the next
removal of the combustion chamber case from the engine, not to
exceed 3,700 hours time-in-service since last hot section
inspection.
    (3) As of the effective date of this AD, do not weld repair the
applicable combustion chamber case assemblies using procedures dated
before the effective date of this AD.

(h) Definition

    TPE331 model engines modified by STC SE383CH may be defined as
the ``Super 1'' and ``Super 2'' for the compressor modification of
the TPE331-1 and the TPE331-2, -2U, and -2UA engines, respectively.
Figures 1 and 2 to paragraph (h) of this AD illustrate the
appearance of combustion chamber case assembly, P/N

893973-5, without and with, respectively, the one-piece bleed pad
with the P3 boss.
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24JA18.002

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24JA18.003

BILLING CODE 4910-13-C

(i) Installation Prohibition

    After the effective date of this AD, do not install a combustion
chamber case assembly, P/N 869728-1, 869728-3, or 893973-5, in
TPE331-3U, -3UW, -5, -5A, -5AB, -5B, -6, and -6A engines or in
TPE331-1, -2, and -2UA engines modified by National Flight Services,
Inc., STC SE383CH, unless the combustion chamber case assembly has a
one-piece bleed pad with P3 boss.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (k) of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(k) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Joseph Costa,
Aerospace Engineer, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, 3960 Paramount
Blvd., Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 562-627-
5210; email: [email protected].

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Honeywell Service Bulletin TPE331-72-2178, Revision 0, dated
May 3, 2011.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For Honeywell service information identified in this AD,
contact Honeywell International Inc., 111 S 34th Street, Phoenix, AZ
85034-2802; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet: https://myaerospace.honeywell.com/wps/portal.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Engine and
Propeller Standards Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on January 17, 2018.
Robert J. Ganley,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-01228 Filed 1-23-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 52 (Friday, March 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14915-14916]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05696]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2014-0028; FRL--10021-79-OMS]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NSPS for Calciners and Dryers in Mineral
Industries (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), NSPS for Calciners and Dryers in
Mineral Industries (EPA ICR Number 0746.11, OMB Control Number 2060-
0251), to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a
proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through May
31, 2021. Public comments were previously requested, via the Federal
Register (85 FR 28003), on May 12, 2020 during a 60-day comment period.
This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A
fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated
burden and cost to the public. An agency may neither conduct nor
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before April 19,
2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2014-0028, to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to: OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
    The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
(202) 564-0050; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov, or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Calciners
and Dryers in Mineral Industries (40 CFR part 60, subpart UUU) were
proposed on April 23, 1986; promulgated on September 28, 1992; and
amended on July 29, 1993. These standards apply only to new calciners
and dryers at mineral processing plants that either process or produce
either any of the following minerals and their concentrates or any
mixture of which the majority is any of the following minerals or a
combination of these minerals: Alumina, ball clay, bentonite,
diatomite, feldspar, fire clay, fuller's earth, gypsum, industrial
sand, kaolin,

lightweight aggregate, magnesium compounds, perlite, roofing granules,
talc, titanium dioxide, and vermiculite. New facilities include those
that commenced construction, modification or reconstruction after the
date of proposal. Owners and operators of affected facilities are
required to comply with the recordkeeping and reporting requirements
(General Provisions at 40 CFR 60, subpart A), as well as for the
specific requirements at 40 CFR part 60, subpart UUU. This includes
submitting initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic
reports. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence
and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation
of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring
system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are
used by EPA to determine compliance with these standards.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Mineral processing plants with
calciners and dryers.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart UUU).
    Estimated number of respondents: 167 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and semiannually.
    Total estimated burden: 6,630 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $887,000 (per year), which includes $109,000
in annualized capital/startup and/or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is no change in hours in the total
estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently approved by
OMB. This is due to two considerations: (1) The regulations have not
changed over the past three years and are not anticipated to change
over the next three years; (2) the growth rate for this industry is
very low or non-existent, so there is no significant change in the
overall burden. Since there are no changes in the regulatory
requirements and there is no significant industry growth, there are
also no changes in the capital/startup or operation and maintenance
(O&M) costs.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-05696 Filed 3-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57495-57496]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22768]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

49 CFR Part 219

[Docket No. FRA-2009-0039]
RIN 2130-AC10

Control of Alcohol and Drug Use: Coverage of Maintenance of Way
Employees, Retrospective Regulatory Review-Based Amendments (RRR)

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 28, 2014, FRA published an NPRM proposing to expand
the scope of its alcohol and drug regulations to cover employees who
perform maintenance-of-way (MOW) activities and certain additional
substantive amendments. This document provides notice that FRA is
extending the comment period for this NPRM by 60 days.

DATES: The comment period for the NPRM published on July 28, 2014 (79
FR 43830), which was closing on September 26, 2014, is extended until
November 25, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Comments: Comments related to Docket No. FRA-2009-0039 may
be submitted by any of the following methods:
     Online: Comments should be filed at the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. DOT, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Room W12-140 on the Ground level of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking, RIN 2130-AC10. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided. Interested parties should also be aware
that anyone is able to search the electronic form of all written
communications and comments received into any agency docket by the name
of the individual submitting the document (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For program and technical issues,
contact Gerald Powers, Drug and Alcohol Program Manager, Office of
Safety Enforcement, Mail Stop 25, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590 (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>),
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For legal issues, contact Elizabeth A. Gross,
Trial Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Mail Stop 10, Washington,
DC 20590 (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Patricia
V. Sun, Trial Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Mail Stop 10, Washington,
DC 20590 (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In response to Congress' mandate in the Rail
Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (RSIA), on July 28, 2014, FRA published
an NPRM proposing to expand the scope of its alcohol and drug
regulations to cover employees who perform maintenance-of-way (MOW)
activities. 79 FR 43830. In addition, in the NPRM, FRA proposed certain
additional substantive amendments to its alcohol and drug regulations
that either respond to National Transportation Safety Board
recommendations or update and clarify the regulations based on a
retrospective regulatory review analysis.
    In a document dated September 15, 2014, the American Public
Transportation Association, American Short Line and Regional Railroad
Association, Association of American

Railroads, and National Railroad Construction and Maintenance
Association, Inc., jointly requested a 60 day extension of the NPRM's
comment period. This document provides notice that FRA is extending the
comment period for this NPRM by 60 days and comments to the NPRM are
now due on November 25, 2014.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 20103, 20107, 20140, 21301, 21304, 21311;
28 U.S.C. 2461, note; Sec. 412, Pub. L. 110-432, 122 Stat. 4889; and
49 CFR 1.89.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 19, 2014.
Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety and Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-22768 Filed 9-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<META name="generator" content="PDFCreactiveX HTML Export">
<META name="creation-date" content="06/06/2008 10:18:39 ">
<TITLE></TITLE>


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6242-6244]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02032]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 33794; 812-14383]

FS Energy and Power Fund and FS/EIG Advisor, LLC

January 29, 2020.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice of an application under Section 6(c) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') for an exemption from Sections
18(a)(2), 18(c), 18(i) and Section 61(a) of the Act.

SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants request an order to permit certain
closed-end management investment companies that have elected to be
regulated as business development companies (``BDCs'') to issue
multiple classes of shares with varying sales loads and asset-based
service and/or distribution fees.

APPLICANTS: FS Energy and Power Fund (the ``Current Fund'') and FS/EIG
Advisor, LLC (the ``Investment Adviser'').

FILING DATES: The application was filed on October 24, 2014 and amended
on August 17, 2018, February 1, 2019, June 28, 2019, and January 29,
2020.

HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally
or by mail.
    Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m.
on February 24, 2020, and should be accompanied by proof of service on
the applicants, in the form of an affidavit, or, for lawyers, a
certificate of service. Pursuant to Rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing
requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, any facts
bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason
for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the
Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090; Applicants: c/o Michael C.
Forman, CEO, Stephen S. Sypherd, General Counsel and Secretary, FS
Energy and Power Fund, 201 Rouse Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19112.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Asen Parachkevov, Senior Counsel, or
David Joire, Senior Special Counsel, at<PHONE_NUMBER> (Division of
Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's website by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Applicants' Representations

    1. The Current Fund is an externally managed, non-diversified,
closed-end management investment company that has elected to be
regulated as a BDC under the Act.\1\ The Current Fund's investment
objective is to generate current income and long-term capital
appreciation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Section 2(a)(48) of the Act defines a BDC to be any closed-
end investment company that operates for the purpose of making
investments in securities described in Sections 55(a)(1) through
55(a)(3) of the Act and makes available significant managerial
assistance with respect to the issuers of such securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. The Investment Adviser is registered as an investment adviser
under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and serves as investment
adviser to the Current Fund.
    3. Applicants seek an order to permit the Funds (defined below) to
offer investors multiple classes of shares of beneficial interest
(``Shares'') with varying sales loads and asset-based service and/or
distribution fees.
    4. Applicants request that the order also apply to any continuously
offered registered closed-end management investment company that elects
to be regulated as a BDC that has been previously organized or that may
be organized in the future for which the Investment Adviser or any
entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the
Investment Adviser, or any successor in interest to any such entity,\2\
acts as investment adviser which periodically offers to repurchase its
Shares pursuant to Rule 13e-4 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act'') and Section 23(c)(2) of the Act (each, a ``Future
Fund'' and together with the Current Fund, the ``Funds'').\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ For purposes of the requested order, ``successor'' is
limited to any entity that results from a reorganization into
another jurisdiction or a change in the type of a business
organization.
    \3\ Any Fund relying on this relief in the future will do so in
compliance with the terms and conditions of the application.
Applicants represent that each entity presently intending to rely on
the requested relief is listed as an applicant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. As a BDC, the Current Fund is organized as a closed-end
investment company, but offers its Shares continuously, similar to an
open-end management investment company. On November 17, 2016, the
Current Fund ceased the public offering of Shares to new investors. The
Current Fund has only issued one class of Shares, but anticipates, if
it recommences the public offering, that it will offer additional
classes of Shares. Shares of the Funds will not be offered or traded in
a secondary market and will not be listed on any securities exchange
and do not trade on an over-the-counter system.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Applicants are not requesting relief with respect to any
Fund listed on a securities exchange. Any Fund which relies on the
relief requested herein will cease relying on such relief upon the
listing of any class of its Shares on a securities exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    6. Each Fund is seeking the ability to offer multiple classes of
Shares that may charge differing front-end sales loads, contingent
deferred sales charges (``CDSCs''), an early withdrawal charge
(``Repurchase Fee''), and/or annual asset-based service and/or
distribution fees. Each class of Shares will comply with the provisions
of Rule 2310 of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') Manual (``FINRA Rule 2310'').\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Any reference to FINRA Rule 2310 includes any successor or
replacement rule that may be adopted by FINRA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    7. Any Share of a Fund that is subject to asset-based service or
distribution fees shall convert to a class with no asset based service
or distribution fees upon such Share reaching the applicable sales
charge cap determined in accordance with FINRA Rule 2310. Further, if a
class of Shares were to be listed on an exchange in the future, all
other then-existing classes of Shares of the listing Fund will be
converted into the listed class, without the imposition of any sales
load, fee or other charge.
    8. In order to provide a limited degree of liquidity to
shareholders, Applicants state that each Fund may from time to time
offer to repurchase Shares in accordance with Rule 13e-4 under the
Exchange Act and Section 23(c)(2) of the Act. Applicants state further
that repurchases of each Fund's Shares will be made at such times, in
such amounts and on such terms as may be determined by the applicable
Fund's board of trustees in its sole discretion.
    9. Each Fund will disclose in its prospectus the fees, expenses and
other characteristics of each class of Shares offered for sale by the
prospectus, as is required for open-end, multiple-class funds under
Form N-1A. As if it were an open-end management investment company,
each Fund will disclose fund expenses in shareholder reports,\6\ and

disclose in its prospectus any arrangements that result in breakpoints
in, or elimination of, sales loads.\7\ Each Fund will also comply with
any requirements the Commission or FINRA may adopt regarding disclosure
at the point of sale and in transaction confirmations about the costs
and conflicts of interest arising out of the distribution of open-end
management investment company shares, and regarding prospectus
disclosure of sales loads and revenue sharing arrangements as if those
requirements applied to the Fund.\8\ Each Fund will contractually
require that any distributor of a Fund's Shares comply with such
requirements in connection with the distribution of such Fund's shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Shareholder Reports and Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
of Registered Management Investment Companies, Investment Co. Act
Rel. No. 26372 (Feb. 27, 2004) (adopting release).
    \7\ See Disclosure of Breakpoint Discounts by Mutual Funds,
Investment Co. Act Rel. No. 26464 (June 7, 2004) (adopting release).
    \8\ See Confirmation Requirements and Point of Sale Disclosure
Requirements for Transactions in Certain Mutual Funds and Other
Securities, and Other Confirmation Requirement Amendments, and
Amendments to the Registration Form for Mutual Funds, Investment Co.
Act Rel. No. 26341 (Jan. 29, 2004) (proposing release).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    10. Distribution fees will be paid pursuant to a plan of
distribution adopted by each Fund in compliance with Rules 12b-1 and
17d-3 under the Act, as if those rules applied to closed-end funds
electing to be regulated as BDCs, with respect to a class (a
``Distribution Plan'').
    11. Each Fund will allocate all expenses incurred by it among the
various classes of Shares based on the respective net assets of the
Fund attributable to each such class, except that the net asset value
and expenses of each class will reflect the expenses associated with
the Distribution Plan of that class (if any), shareholder servicing
fees attributable to a particular class (including transfer agency
fees, if any) and any other incremental expenses of that class.
Expenses of the Fund allocated to a particular class of the Fund's
Shares will be borne on a pro rata basis by each outstanding Share of
that class. Applicants state that each Fund will comply with the
provisions of Rule 18f-3 under the Act as if it were an open-end
management investment company.
    12. Any Fund that imposes a CDSC will comply with the provisions of
Rule 6c-10 (except to the extent a Fund will comply with FINRA Rule
2310 rather than FINRA Rule 2341, as such rule may be amended (``FINRA
Rule 2341'')), as if that rule applied to BDCs. With respect to any
waiver of, scheduled variation in, or elimination of the CDSC, a Fund
will comply with the requirements of Rule 22d-1 under the Act as if the
Fund were an open-end management investment company. Each Fund also
will disclose CDSCs in accordance with the requirements of Form N-1A
concerning CDSCs as if the Fund were an open-end management investment
company.
    13. Funds may impose a Repurchase Fee at a rate no greater than 2%
of the shareholder's repurchase proceeds if the interval between the
date of purchase of the Shares and the valuation date with respect to
the repurchase of such Shares is less than a specified period. Any
Repurchase Fee will apply equally to all shareholders of the applicable
Fund, regardless of class, consistent with Section 18 of the Act and
Rule 18f-3 under the Act. To the extent a Fund determines to waive,
impose scheduled variations of, or eliminate any Repurchase Fees, it
will do so consistently with the requirements of Rule 22d-1 under the
Act as if the Repurchase Fee were a CDSC and as if the Fund were an
open-end investment company and the Fund's waiver of, scheduled
variation in, or elimination of, the Repurchase Fee will apply
uniformly to all shareholders of the Fund.

Applicants' Legal Analysis

Multiple Classes of Shares

    1. Section 18(a)(2) of the Act provides that a closed-end
investment company may not issue or sell a senior security that is a
stock unless certain requirements are met. Applicants state that the
creation of multiple classes of shares of the Funds may violate Section
18(a)(2), which is made applicable to BDCs through Section 61(a) of the
Act, because the Funds may not meet such requirements with respect to a
class of shares that may be a senior security.
    2. Section 18(c) of the Act provides, in relevant part, that a
closed-end investment company may not issue or sell any senior security
if, immediately thereafter, the company has outstanding more than one
class of senior security. Applicants state that the creation of
multiple classes of Shares of the Funds may be prohibited by Section
18(c), which is made applicable to BDCs through Section 61(a) of the
Act, as a class may have priority over another class as to payment of
dividends because shareholders of different classes would pay different
fees and expenses.
    3. Section 18(i) of the Act provides that each share of stock
issued by a registered management investment company will be a voting
stock and have equal voting rights with every other outstanding voting
stock. Applicants state that multiple classes of shares of the Funds
may violate Section 18(i) of the Act, which is made applicable to BDCs
through Section 61(a) of the Act, because each class would be entitled
to exclusive voting rights with respect to matters solely related to
that class.
    4. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that the Commission may exempt
any person, security or transaction or any class or classes of persons,
securities or transactions from any provision of the Act, or from any
rule or regulation under the Act, if and to the extent such exemption
is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with
the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the
policy and provisions of the Act. Applicants request an exemption under
Section 6(c) from Sections 18(a)(2), 18(c) and 18(i) (which are made
applicable to BDCs by Section 61(a) of the Act) to permit the Funds to
issue multiple classes of Shares.
    5. Applicants submit that the proposed allocation of expenses
relating to distribution and voting rights among multiple classes is
equitable and will not discriminate against any group or class of
shareholders. Applicants submit that the proposed arrangements would
permit a Fund to facilitate the distribution of its Shares and provide
investors with a broader choice of fee options. Applicants assert that
the proposed BDC multiple class structure does not raise the concerns
underlying Section 18 of the Act to any greater degree than open-end
management investment companies' multiple class structures that are
permitted by Rule 18f-3 under the Act.

Applicants' Condition

    Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will
be subject to the following condition:
    1. Each Fund will comply with the provisions of Rules 6c-10 (except
to the extent a Fund will comply with FINRA Rule 2310 rather than FINRA
Rule 2341), 12b-1, 17d-3, 18f-3, 22d-1, and, where applicable, 11a-3
under the 1940 Act, as amended from time to time, or any successor
rules thereto, as if those rules applied to BDCs. In addition, each
Fund will comply with FINRA Rule 2310, as amended from time to time, or
any successor rule thereto, and will make available to any distributor
of a Fund's shares all of the information necessary to permit the
distributor to prepare client account statements in compliance with
FINRA Rule 2231.

    By the Commission.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-02032 Filed 2-3-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 139 (Friday, July 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43196-43197]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17381]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3178-001.
    Applicants: Windstar Energy, LLC.
    Description: Windstar Energy, LLC's Supplement to March 25, 2013
Notice of Change in Status and Waiver Request of Certain Reporting
Requirements.
    Filed Date: 4/8/13.
    Accession Number: 20130408-5195.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/13.
    Docket Numbers: ER11-3417-003; ER10-2895-006; ER11-2292-005; ER11-
3942-004; ER11-2293-005; ER10-2917-006; ER11-2294-005; ER12-2447-003;
ER10-2918-007; ER12-199-006; ER10-2920-006; ER10-1900-004; ER11-3941-
004; ER10-2921-006; ER10-2922-006; ER10-3048-004; ER10-2966-006.
    Applicants: Alta Wind VIII, LLC, Bear Swamp Power Company LLC,
Brookfield Energy Marketing, Inc., Brookfield Energy Marketing LP,
Brookfield Energy Marketing US LLC, Brookfield Renewable Energy
Marketing US, Brookfield Smoky Mountain Hydropower LLC, Carr Street
Generating Station, L.P., Coram California Development, L.P., Erie
Boulevard Hydropower, L.P.,FPL Energy Maine

Hydro LLC, Granite Reliable Power, LLC, Great Lakes Hydro America LLC,
Hawks Nest Hydro LLC, Longview Fibre Paper and Packaging, Inc., Rumford
Falls Hydro LLC, Brookfield Power Piney & Deep Creek LLC.
    Description: Brookfield Companies Supplement to March 25, 2013
Notice of Change in Status.
    Filed Date: 4/8/13.
    Accession Number: 20130408-5190.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-1157-000.
    Applicants: Ameren Illinois Company.
    Description: Refund Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 7/10/13.
    Accession Number: 20130710-5068.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-1256-000.
    Applicants: The Narragansett Electric Company.
    Description: The Narragansett Electric Company submits Refund
Report regarding Interconnection Agreement with Pontiac Energy Corp. to
be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 7/10/13.
    Accession Number: 20130710-5150.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-1692-000.
    Applicants: Florida Power & Light Company.
    Description: Supplement to the FPL and Miami-Dade County Service
Agreement No. 124 to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 7/10/13.
    Accession Number: 20130710-5101.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-1925-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of Colorado.
    Description: 2013-07-10--333-PSCo TSGT Davis CA to be effective 6/
11/2013.
    Filed Date: 7/10/13.
    Accession Number: 20130710-5097.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-1931-000.
    Applicants: South Jersey Energy ISO3, LLC.
    Description: Market Based Rates Tariff to be effective 7/11/2013.
    Filed Date: 7/10/13.
    Accession Number: 20130710-5131.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/31/13.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 10, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-17381 Filed 7-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 27, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6401-6402]
[FR Doc No: 2019-03399]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]

Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public Notice

    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of
the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission
decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt off-
the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested
proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of
the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any
oral communication.
    Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional
file associated with, but not a part of, the decisional record of the
proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited
communication and any responses thereto should become a part of the
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication, and may
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant
such a request only when it determines that fairness so requires. Any
person identified below as

having made a prohibited off-the-record communication shall serve the
document on all parties listed on the official service list for the
applicable proceeding in accordance with Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
    Exempt off-the-record communications are included in the decisional
record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e) (1) (v).
    The following is a list of off-the-record communications recently
received by the Secretary of the Commission. The communications listed
are grouped by docket numbers in ascending order. These filings are
available for electronic review at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits, in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Docket No.                      File date                  Presenter or requester
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prohibited:
    1. CP18-5...............................         2/11/19  Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation.
        ER19-570
    2. EL19-9-000...........................          2/8/19  Congress Member Frank Pallone, Jr.
Exempt:
    1. P-2413...............................          2/7/19  Congress Member Jody Hice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: February 21, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-03399 Filed 2-26-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P