TWIC readers 5 years after the original installation. Maintenance costs
account for the costs to maintain TWIC readers every year after the
original installation. Operational costs include costs that occur only
at the time of the TWIC reader installation and initial training.
Operational costs also include ongoing costs, such as those for keeping
and maintaining records, downloading the canceled card list, and
ongoing annual training. We also modified the 2016 final rule cost
estimates to correct errors in the calculations of the average number
of readers per access point, the average installation cost per reader,
and the average infrastructure cost per reader. We used these values to
calculate capital and maintenance costs, and by correcting these errors
the annualized total capital and maintenance costs increased by
approximately $4.11 million and 0.01 million respectively (in 2016 $
with a 7-percent discount rate). Table 5 presents a comparison of these
facility costs before and after our corrections, as well as a
comparison of the costs in 2012 and 2016 dollars, and an estimate of
the total number of facilities complying with the regulation each year.

                                                              Table 5--Comparison of Total Cost for Facilities in 2012 Dollars and 2016 Dollars Under 2016 TWIC Reader Rule
                                                                                [Millions]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Capital costs                       Maintenance costs               Operational costs *               Undiscounted total
                                                                                -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Number  of     Total                       2012$--                               2012$--                                        2012$--published   2012$--
                              Year                                    new      number of  2012$--published    fixed             2012$--published    fixed             2012$--published             in  2016 final     fixed
                                                                  facilities  facilities   in  2016 final     math      2016$    in  2016 final     math      2016$    in  2016 final     2016$     TWIC  rule RA      math      2016$
                                                                                TWIC  rule RA    errors               TWIC  rule RA    errors               TWIC  rule RA                   \120\         errors
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1...............................................................         263         263          $49.49      $64.51    $68.31           $0.00       $0.00     $0.00           $1.99       $2.10          $51.47       $66.49     $70.42
2...............................................................         262         525           49.49       64.51     68.31            0.99        0.99      1.05            2.16        2.29           52.64        67.66      71.66
3...............................................................           0         525            0.00        0.00      0.00            1.97        1.99      2.11            1.34        1.42            3.31         3.33       3.52
4...............................................................           0         525            0.00        0.00      0.00            1.97        1.99      2.11            1.34        1.42            3.31         3.33       3.52
5...............................................................           0         525            0.00        0.00      0.00            1.97        1.99      2.11            1.34        1.42            3.31         3.33       3.52
6...............................................................           0         525            9.87        9.94     10.53            1.97        1.99      2.11            1.34        1.42           13.18        13.27      14.05
7...............................................................           0         525            9.87        9.94     10.53            1.97        1.99      2.11            1.34        1.42           13.18        13.27      14.05
8...............................................................           0         525            0.00        0.00      0.00            1.97        1.99      2.11            1.34        1.42            3.31         3.33       3.52
9...............................................................           0         525            0.00        0.00      0.00            1.97        1.99      2.11            1.34        1.42            3.31         3.33       3.52
10..............................................................           0         525            0.00        0.00      0.00            1.97        1.99      2.11            1.34        1.42            3.31         3.33       3.52
                                                                                -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total...............................................................................          118.71      148.90    157.69           16.78       16.90     17.90           14.84       15.72          150.33       180.65     191.31
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals may not sum due to rounding.
* The math errors in the 2016 RA did not impact operational costs, so they did not need to be adjusted.

    Table 6 summarizes the total costs to industry of the 2016 TWIC
Reader rule in 2016 dollars. We estimated the annualized cost to be
$27.29 million at a 7-percent discount rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \120\ Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC)
Reader Requirements, 2016: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/08/23/2016-19383/transportation-worker-identification-credential-twic-reader-requirements, at 57700.

                                                Table 6--Total Industry Cost Under 2016 TWIC Reader Rule
                                                                [Millions, 2016 dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Additional
                          Year                               Facility         Vessel          costs *      Undiscounted         7%              3%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.......................................................          $70.42           $0.02           $4.46          $74.90          $70.00          $72.72
2.......................................................           71.66            0.00            4.46           76.12           66.48           71.75
3.......................................................            3.52            0.00            4.46            7.98            6.52            7.31
4.......................................................            3.52            0.00            4.46            7.98            6.09            7.09
5.......................................................            3.52            0.00            4.46            7.98            5.69            6.89
6.......................................................           14.05            0.02            4.46           18.53           12.35           15.52
7.......................................................           14.05            0.00            4.46           18.51           11.53           15.05
8.......................................................            3.52            0.00            4.46            7.98            4.65            6.30
9.......................................................            3.52            0.00            4.46            7.98            4.34            6.12
10......................................................            3.51            0.00            4.46            7.98            4.06            5.94
                                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total...............................................          191.29            0.07           44.59          235.96          191.71          214.69
                                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Annualized......................................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............           27.29           25.17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* These costs include additional delay, travel, and TWIC replacement costs due to TWIC failures.
Invalid electronic TWIC inspection transaction would lead to the use of a secondary processing operation, such as a visual TWIC inspection, additional
  identification validation, or other provisions as set forth in the FSP. Such actions cause delays. Furthermore, the use of TWIC readers will also
  increase the likelihood of faulty TWICs (TWICs that are not machine readable) being identified and the need for secondary screening procedures so
  affected workers and operators can address these issues. If a TWIC holder's card is faulty and cannot be read, the TWIC-holder would need to travel to
  a TWIC Enrollment Center to get a replacement TWIC, which may result in additional travel and replacement costs. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

Final Rule Costs
    This rule will delay the effective date of the TWIC Reader rule by
3 years for 370 facilities that handle bulk CDC and an unestimated
number of facilities that receive vessels carrying bulk CDC, but do not
transfer it to or from the vessel during that vessel-to-facility
interface. For analytical purposes, we maintain the assumption from the
2016 TWIC Reader rule RA that 50 percent of facilities will comply each
year of the implementation period. Therefore, for this rule we assume
that 50 percent of facilities with a 3-year implementation delay will
comply in year 3, and 50 percent of facilities with a 3-year
implementation delay will comply in year 4. We maintain this assumption
to provide a consistent comparison between the baseline cost estimates
presented in the TWIC Reader rule, and the costs of this rule.
    The costs are separated into three categories: Capital costs,
maintenance costs, and operating costs. To estimate the capital costs
in a given year, we multiplied the total baseline capital costs for all
facilities by the percentage of facilities incurring costs in a given
year. We calculated the total initial baseline capital costs for TWIC
installation for all facilities by adding the baseline capital costs
presented in table 5 for years 1 and 2 ($68.31 million + $68.31 million
= $136.63 million). We calculated the total baseline capital costs for
replacing TWIC readers 5 years after the original installation by
adding the baseline capital costs presented in table 5 for years 6 and
7 ($10.53 million + $10.53 million = $21.06 million). We then
multiplied these numbers by the percentage of facilities incurring the
cost in a given year. For example, in year 1, a total of 78 facilities
are expected to incur capital costs, for a total industry cost of
$20.30 million ($136.63 million x (78 facilities / 525 facilities)).
Table 7 presents annual capital costs for all years.

   Table 7--Capital Costs for Facilities of Partially Delaying the Effective Date of the 2016 TWIC Reader Rule
                                             [Millions 2016 dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Number of     Total number
                                            Total baseline    facilities     of facilities
                   Year                      capital costs   with capital   subject to the   Annual capital cost
                                                                 costs           rule
                                                       (a)             (b)             (c)    (d) = (a) x [(b) /
                                                                                (c)]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.........................................         $136.63              78             525                $20.30
2.........................................          136.63              77             525                 20.04
3.........................................          136.63             185             525                 48.14
4.........................................          136.63             185             525                 48.14
5.........................................          136.63               0             525                  0.00
6.........................................           21.06              78             525                  3.13
7.........................................           21.06              77             525                  3.09
8.........................................           21.06             185             525                  7.42
9.........................................           21.06             185             525                  7.42
10........................................           21.06               0             525                  0.00
                                           ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.................................  ..............  ..............  ..............                157.69
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.

    Because maintenance costs are not incurred until the year after the
TWIC readers are installed, we calculated the maintenance costs in a
given year by multiplying the total baseline costs for all facilities
by the percentage of facilities complying in the previous year. The
total initial baseline maintenance costs for TWIC readers, $2.11
million, is found in year 3 of table 5 as this is the first year that
all facilities will incur maintenance costs under the baseline. To
estimate maintenance costs, we multiplied the percentage of facilities
incurring the cost in a given year by the total costs. Because
maintenance costs are not incurred until the year after the TWIC reader
is installed, the total number of facilities incurring the cost is
equal to the total number of complying facilities in the previous year.
For example, we calculated Year 2 costs as follows: $2.11 million x (78
facilities / 525 facilities) = $0.31 million. Table 8 presents annual
maintenance costs for all years.

Table 8--Total Maintenance Costs for Facilities of Partially Delaying the Effective Date of the 2016 TWIC Reader
                                                      Rule
                                             [Millions 2016 dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Number of
                                            Total baseline    facilities     Total number
                   Year                       maintenance        with        of facilities   Annual maintenance
                                                 costs        maintenance   subject to the          cost
                                                                 costs           rule
                                                       (a)             (b)             (c)    (d) = (a) x [(b) /
                                                                                (c)]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.........................................           $2.11               0             525                 $0.00
2.........................................            2.11              78             525                  0.31
3.........................................            2.11             155             525                  0.62
4.........................................            2.11             340             525                  1.36
5.........................................            2.11             525             525                  2.11
6.........................................            2.11             525             525                  2.11
7.........................................            2.11             525             525                  2.11
8.........................................            2.11             525             525                  2.11
9.........................................            2.11             525             525                  2.11
10........................................            2.11             525             525                  2.11
                                           ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.................................  ..............  ..............  ..............                 14.94
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.

    We estimated operational costs in a similar manner, multiplying
total operational costs by the percentage of facilities complying in a
given year. Table 7 presents the total cost to facilities under this
final rule. We calculated total operational costs by adding the
baseline operational costs in Years 1 and 2 as presented in table 5
($2.10 million + $2.29 million = $4.39 million). However, this total
includes a $0.187 million in costs for ongoing costs such as training,
which do not occur the first year a facility installs a TWIC reader.
Therefore, the total initial operational cost to industry is $4.206
million ($4.39 million - $0.187 million). We then multiplied the total
cost by the percentage of new facilities complying in a given year. We
also accounted for ongoing costs to industry, which we calculated by
multiplying the total ongoing operational costs of $1.42 million per
year (see year 3 of table 5) by the percentage of facilities incurring
ongoing costs. For example, in year 2, we calculated the total initial
costs to be $0.617 million ($4.206 million x (77 facilities / 525
facilities)), and we calculated the total ongoing costs to be $0.210
million ($1.416 million x (78 facilities / 525 facilities)), for a
total cost of $0.827 million ($2.10 million + $0.21 million). The
$1.416 million ongoing cost includes not only the $0.187 million in
ongoing costs, but also the cost to update the canceled card list
annually. Table 9 presents annual operational costs.

                  Table 9--Total Operational Costs for Facilities of Partially Delaying the Effective Date of the 2016 TWIC Reader Rule
                                                                 [Millions 2016 dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                Number of      Total                             Total      Number of
                                     Total      facilities   number of                          baseline    facilities                          Total
              Year                  baseline       with      facilities     Total initial       ongoing        with        Total ongoing     operational
                                    initial      initial     subject to   operational costs   operational    ongoing     operational costs      costs
                                     costs        costs       the rule                           costs        costs
                                          (a)          (b)          (c)   (d) = (a) x [(b) /          (e)          (f)   (g) = (e) x [(f) /  (h) = (d) +
                                                                                (c)]                                           (c)]          (g)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1...............................       $4.206           78          525                $0.62        $1.42            0                $0.00        $0.62
2...............................        4.206           77          525                 0.62         1.42           78                 0.21         0.83
3...............................        4.206          185          525                 1.48         1.42          155                 0.42         1.90
4...............................        4.206          185          525                 1.48         1.42          340                 0.92         2.40
5...............................        4.206            0          525                 0.00         1.42          525                 1.42         1.42
6...............................        4.206            0          525                 0.00         1.42          525                 1.42         1.42
7...............................        4.206            0          525                 0.00         1.42          525                 1.42         1.42
8...............................        4.206            0          525                 0.00         1.42          525                 1.42         1.42
9...............................        4.206            0          525                 0.00         1.42          525                 1.42         1.42
10..............................        4.206            0          525                 0.00         1.42          525                 1.42         1.42
                                 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Total.......................  ...........  ...........  ...........  ...................  ...........  ...........  ...................        14.25
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.

    Table 10 presents the total undiscounted cost to facilities under
this final rule, including all capital, maintenance, and operational
costs.

                        Table 10--Total Cost for Facilities of Partially Delaying the Effective Date of the 2016 TWIC Reader Rule
                                                                 [Millions 2016 dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Number of new   Total number                     Maintenance     Operational    Undiscounted
                          Year                              facilities     of facilities   Capital costs       costs           costs           total
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.......................................................              78              78          $20.30           $0.00           $0.62          $20.92
2.......................................................              77             155           20.04            0.31            0.83           21.18
3.......................................................             185             340           48.14            0.62            1.90           50.67
4.......................................................             185             525           48.14            1.36            2.40           51.91
5.......................................................               0             525            0.00            2.11            1.42            3.52
6.......................................................               0             525            3.13            2.11            1.42            6.65
7.......................................................               0             525            3.09            2.11            1.42            6.61
8.......................................................               0             525            7.42            2.11            1.42           10.94
9.......................................................               0             525            7.42            2.11            1.42           10.94
10......................................................               0             525            0.00            2.11            1.42            3.52
                                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total...............................................  ..............  ..............          157.69           14.94           14.25          186.87
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.

    Table 11 summarizes the total costs to industry of this rule. This
rule will not impact the compliance schedule of vessels. Therefore,
these costs remain unchanged from the baseline. We calculated the
additional costs by multiplying the totals in Table 5 by the percentage
of facilities complying within a given year and phasing them in 2
years. Over 10 years, we estimate the annualized cost to industry to be
$23.92 million at a 7-percent discount rate.

                        Table 11--Total Industry Cost Under of Partially Delaying the Effective Date of the 2016 TWIC Reader Rule
                                                             [Millions, 2016 dollars] \121\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Additional
                          Year                               Facility         Vessel          costs *      Undiscounted         7%              3%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.......................................................          $20.92          $0.022           $0.66          $21.61          $20.19          $20.98
2.......................................................           21.18          0.0038            1.32           22.50           19.65           21.21
3.......................................................           50.67          0.0038            2.89           53.56           43.72           49.01
4.......................................................           51.91          0.0038            4.46           56.37           43.00           50.08
5.......................................................            3.52          0.0038            4.46            7.98            5.69            6.89
6.......................................................            6.65           0.019            4.46           11.13            7.42            9.32
7.......................................................            6.61          0.0038            4.46           11.07            6.90            9.00
8.......................................................           10.94          0.0038            4.46           15.41            8.97           12.16
9.......................................................           10.94          0.0038            4.46           15.41            8.38           11.81
10......................................................            3.52          0.0038            4.46            7.98            4.06            5.94
                                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total...............................................          186.87           0.072           36.08          223.02          167.98          196.40
                                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Annualized......................................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............           23.92           23.02
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* These costs include additional delay, travel, and TWIC replacement costs due to TWIC failures.
Totals may not sum due to rounding.

    Table 12 presents the estimated change in total costs to industry
from delaying the implementation of the TWIC reader rule by 3 years for
facilities that handle bulk CDC, but do not transfer it to or from a
vessel, and facilities that receive vessels carrying bulk CDC, but do
not transfer it to or from the vessel during that vessel-to-facility
interface. We estimated an annualized cost savings to industry of $3.38
million at a 7-percent discount rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \121\ See page 55 of the TWIC Delay final rule, table 6.

     Table 12--Total Change in Industry Cost From Partially Delaying the Effective Date of TWIC Reader Rule
                                            [Millions, 2016 dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Total 10-year cost               Annualized cost
                              Total 10-year cost           (discounted)          -------------------------------
                               (not discounted)  --------------------------------
                                                        7%              3%              7%              3%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TWIC reader rule............             $235.96         $191.71         $214.69          $27.29          $25.17
Delay TWIC Reader rule by 3               223.02          167.98          196.40           23.92           23.02
 years......................
                             -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Change..................             (12.95)         (23.73)         (18.28)          (3.38)          (2.14)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Qualitative Costs
    Qualitative costs are as shown in table 3. This rule will delay the
cost to retrieve or replace lost Personal Identification Numbers (PINs)
for use with TWICs for the facilities with delayed implementation.
Government Costs
    This final rule will also generate a cost savings to the government
from delaying the review of the revised security plans for 370 Risk
Group A facilities that handle bulk CDC and facilities that receive
vessels carrying bulk CDC. There is no change in cost to the government
resulting from TWIC inspections, because inspections are already
required under MTSA, and the TWIC reader requirements do not modify
these requirements. As such, there is no additional cost to the
government.
    To estimate the cost to the government, we followed the same
approach as the industry cost analysis and adjusted the cost estimate
presented in the TWIC Reader rule RA from 2012 dollars to 2016 dollars.
For the government analysis, we used the fully loaded 2016 wage rate
for an E-5 level staff member, $51 per hour, from Commandant 7310.1R:
Reimbursable Standard Rates, in place of the 2012 wage of $49 per
hour.\122\ We then estimate a government cost of $53,550 in the first 2
years ($51 x 4 hours per review x 262.5 plans).\123\ Table 13 presents
the annualized baseline government costs of $13,785 at a 7-percent
discount rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \122\ Because the Coast Guard is not delaying the implementation
schedule for vessels, the rule will have no impact on the costs
associated with vessel security plans, and, therefore, we did not
include them in this RA.
    \123\ See page 72 of the 2016 TWIC Reader rule RA.

                           Table 13--Total Government Cost Under 2016 TWIC Reader Rule
                                                 [2016 Dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              Year                                  Cost of FSP         7%              3%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1...............................................................         $53,550         $50,047         $51,990
2...............................................................          53,550          46,773          50,476
3...............................................................               0               0               0
4...............................................................               0               0               0
5...............................................................               0               0               0
6...............................................................               0               0               0
7...............................................................               0               0               0
8...............................................................               0               0               0
9...............................................................               0               0               0
10..............................................................               0               0               0
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
    Total.......................................................         107,100          96,819         102,466
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
        Annualized..............................................  ..............          13,785          12,012
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Table 14 presents the government cost under this final rule, from
delaying the effective date of the 2016 TWIC Reader rule for facilities
that handle CDC in bulk. We estimated the annualized government cost to
be $12,556 at a 7-percent discount rate. To estimate government costs
in year 1 and year 2, we used the same approach as the baseline cost
estimates.\124\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \124\ We calculated the total cost in year 1 as 4 hours x $51 x
202 FSPs; the total cost in year 2 as 4 hours x $51 x 201 FSP; and
the total cost in Years 3 and 4 as 4 hours x $51 x 61 FSPs.

  Table 14--Total Government Costs of Partially Delaying the Effective Date of the 2016 TWIC Reader Rule, Risk
                                                     Group A
                                                 [2016 Dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              Year                                  Cost of FSP         7%              3%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1...............................................................         $15,912         $14,871         $15,449
2...............................................................          15,708          13,720          14,806
3...............................................................          37,740          30,807          34,537
4...............................................................          37,740          28,792          33,532
5...............................................................               0               0               0
6...............................................................               0               0               0
7...............................................................               0               0               0
8...............................................................               0               0               0
9...............................................................               0               0               0
10..............................................................               0               0               0
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
    Total.......................................................         107,100          88,190          98,324
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
        Annualized..............................................  ..............          12,556          11,527
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Table 15 presents the estimated change in government costs from
delaying the implementation of the TWIC Reader rule by 3 years for
facilities that handle bulk CDC and facilities that receive vessels
carrying bulk CDC. We estimated an annualized cost savings to the
government of $1,229 at a 7-percent discount rate.

       Table 15--Total Change in Government Cost from Delaying the Effective Date of 2016 TWIC Reader Rule
                                                [2016 Dollars] *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Total cost (discounted)            Annualized cost
                                Total cost (not  ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                  discounted)           7%              3%              7%              3%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TWIC reader rule............            $107,100         $96,819        $102,466         $13,785         $12,012
Delay TWIC Reader rule by 3              107,100          88,190          98,324          12,556          11,527
 years......................
                             -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Change..................                 0.0         (8,630)         (4,143)         (1,229)           (486)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Over a ten year period.

    Using a perpetual period of analysis, we estimated the total
annualized cost savings of the rule to be $1.53 million in 2016
dollars, discounted back to 2016 dollars.
Change in Benefits
    As noted, this rule will delay the effective date of the TWIC
reader requirement for three categories of facilities: (1) Facilities
that handle certain dangerous cargoes in bulk, but do not transfer
these cargoes to or from a vessel; (2) facilities that handle certain
dangerous cargoes in bulk, and do transfer these cargoes to or from a
vessel; and (3) facilities that receive vessels carrying certain
dangerous cargoes in bulk, but do not, during that vessel-to-facility
interface, transfer these bulk cargoes to or from those vessels. The
facilities for which the TWIC reader rule will be delayed will delay
the enhanced benefits of electronic inspection, such as ensuring that
only individuals who hold valid TWICs are granted unescorted access to
secure areas, enhanced verification of personal identity, and a
reduction in potential vulnerability by establishing earlier the intent
of perpetrators who attempt to bypass or thwart the TWIC readers.
Summary of Cost Savings Under Executive Order 13771
    This rule will generate a cost savings to both the industry and
government, and therefore, this rule is an Executive Order 13771
deregulatory action. Table 16 summarizes the cost savings of this rule
by comparing and subtracting the costs of this rule from the TWIC
Reader rule costs. Because this rule will delay the implementation of
the TWIC Reader rule by 3 years for 370 facilities, it will result in
cost savings of $23.73 million for industry, $0.01 million for
government, and $23.74 million total (all discounted at 7 percent) over
a 10-year period of analysis. At a 7-percent discount rate, we estimate
the annualized cost savings to be $3.38 million to the industry, $0.001
million to the government, and $3.38 million total. Using a 3-percent
discount rate, we estimate the annualized cost savings to be $2.14
million to the industry, $0.0005 million to the government, and $2.14
million total. Using a perpetual period of analysis, we found total
annualized cost savings of the rule to industry and the government to
be $1.53 million in 2016 dollars, discounted back to 2016.

                         Table 16--Summary of Costs Savings Under Executive Order 13771
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Category                             Cost savings of this final rule (millions 2016$)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Costs to Industry, Government and Total ($    Industry: $23.73 (10-year).
 millions, 7% discount rate).                 Government: $0.01 (10-year).
                                              Total: $23.74 (10-year).
                                              Industry: $3.38 (annualized).
                                              Government: $0.001 (annualized).
                                              Total: $3.38 (annualized).
                                              Industry: $1.53 (perpetual).
                                              Government: $0.0005 (perpetual).
                                              Total: $1.53 (perpetual).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alternatives
    One regulatory alternative to this final rule is for the Coast
Guard to take no action. Under this alternative, the TWIC Reader rule
would become effective 60 days after Congress receives the HSOAC
assessment, and all 370 facilities we identified in our 2016 TWIC
Reader rule RA, in addition to the unknown number of facilities, would
be expected to comply with the TWIC Reader rule. These entities would
be required to implement the requirements for the electronic inspection
of TWICs and would incur the costs we estimated in our 2016 TWIC Reader
rule RA unless a waiver was granted by the Coast Guard.
    Another alternative the Coast Guard considered was a waiver
approach. However, because we currently lack a comprehensive risk
analysis on the level of individualized facilities, we do not believe
this approach maximizes benefits. In the absence of a new comprehensive
risk analysis, the Coast Guard might issue blanket waivers that include
facilities that may indeed warrant the additional security of
electronic inspection. For example, consider two facilities with a
5,000 gallon tank of a CDC each. The tank in the first facility is
placed near enough to the perimeter fence in a populated area that, if
the tank explodes, would kill enough people to cause a TSI and,
therefore, should require electronic TWIC inspection. That same tank on
the other facility is located away from the water in an isolated area
within the MTSA footprint (not near a population). If this tank
explodes, it does not cause a TSI and therefore should not need to
conduct electronic TWIC inspection. If the Coast Guard issued a blanket
waiver for those facilities with a storage tank of CDC with 5,000
gallons or less, then we would not be properly implementing these
requirements to mitigate the risks as intended.
    We rejected both alternatives (`no action' and `waiver approach')
because they do not address our need to conduct a comprehensive risk
analysis at the individual facility level to determine whether or not
those 370 facilities and an unknown number of facilities would be
required to comply with the final rule 60 days after Congress receives
the HSOAC assessment, and also develop a consistent methodology that
would form the rationale for Coast Guard when issuing waivers.

B. Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, we have
considered whether this rule will have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard will delay the effective date of the TWIC Reader
rule until May 8, 2023 for facilities that handle CDC in bulk. We
estimate these facilities will experience an annualized cost savings of
approximately $9,000 (with a 7-percent discount rate), and that on
average each entity owns two facilities and will save approximately
$18,000. We calculate that approximately 2% of the small entities
impacted by this delay rule will have a cost savings that is greater
than 1% but less than 3% of their annual revenue. The other 98% will
have a cost savings that is less than 1% of their annual revenue.
    Given this information, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.

C. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-121, we offer to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).

D. Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.

E. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism) if it has a substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13132 and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132. Our analysis follows.
    This rule will delay the implementation of existing regulations on
certain facilities after evaluation by a risk-based set of security
measures of MTSA-regulated facilities. Based on this analysis, each
facility is classified according to its risk level, which then
determines whether the facility will be required to conduct electronic
TWIC inspection. As this rule does not impose any new requirements, but
simply delays the implementation of existing requirements, it does not
have preemptive impact.

    Additionally, Executive Order 13132 require that for any rules with
preemptive effect, the Coast Guard provide elected officials of
affected State and local governments and their representative national
organizations the notice and opportunity for appropriate participation
in any rulemaking proceedings, and consultation with such officials
early in the rulemaking process. Please refer to the TWIC Reader final
rule for additional information regarding the federalism analysis of
the substantive requirements (81 FR 57652, 57706).
    While it is well settled that States may not regulate in categories
in which Congress intended the Coast Guard to be the sole source of a
vessel's obligations, the Coast Guard recognizes the key role that
State and local governments may have in making regulatory
determinations. Additionally, for rules with federalism implications
and preemptive effect, Executive Order 13132 specifically directs
agencies to consult with State and local governments during the
rulemaking process. If you believe this rule has implications for
federalism under Executive Order 13132, please call or email the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble.

F. Unfunded Mandates

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538,
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Although this rule will not result
in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

G. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630 (Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights).

H. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

I. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045 (Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks). This
rule is not an economically significant rule and will not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

J. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments),
because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

K. Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211 (Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use). We have determined that it is not a
``significant energy action'' under Executive Order 13211, because
although it is a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866, it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on
the supply, distribution, or use of energy, and the Administrator of
OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated
it as a significant energy action.

L. Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act, codified as a
note to 15 U.S.C. 272, directs agencies to use voluntary consensus
standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides
Congress, through OMB, with an explanation of why using these standards
would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g.,
specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test
methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices)
that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

M. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning Commandant
Instruction (COMDTINST) 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4321-4370f), and determined that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. A Record of Environmental
Consideration (REC) supporting this determination is available in the
docket where indicated under the ADDRESSES portion of the preamble.
This rule is categorically excluded under paragraph L54 in Table 3-1 of
U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementing Procedures.
Paragraph L54 pertains to regulations that are editorial or procedural.
This rule establishes a 3 year postponement of the effective date for
deploying electronic transportation security card readers and requiring
electronic TWIC inspection at certain facilities affected by the final
rule entitled ``Transportation Worker Identification Credential
(TWIC)--Reader Requirements,'' published in the Federal Register on
August 23, 2016. This rule supports the Coast Guard's statutory mission
to ensure port, waterway, and coastal security.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 105

    Maritime security, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 105 as follows:

PART 105--MARITIME SECURITY: FACILITIES

0
1. The authority citation for part 105 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 70103; 50 U.S.C. 191;
Sec. 811, Pub. L. 111-281, 124 Stat. 2905; 33 CFR 1.05-16.04-11,
6.14, 6.16, and 6.19; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. In Sec.  105.253, revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) and add paragaphs
(a)(3) and (4) to read as follows:

Sec.  105.253   Risk Group classifications for facilities.

    (a) * * *
    (1) Beginning June 8, 2020: Facilities that receive vessels
certificated to carry more than 1,000 passengers.
    (2) Beginning May 8, 2023: Facilities that handle Certain Dangerous
Cargoes (CDC) in bulk and transfer such cargoes from or to a vessel.
    (3) Beginning May 8, 2023: Facilities that handle CDC in bulk, but
do not transfer it from or to a vessel.
    (4) Beginning May 8, 2023: Facilities that receive vessels carrying
CDC in bulk but, during the vessel-to-facility

interface, do not transfer it from or to the vessel.
* * * * *

    Dated: October 31, 2019.
Karl L. Schultz,
Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commandant.

    Editorial note:  The U.S. Coast Guard requested that the Office
of the Federal Register hold this document from publication until
delivery to Congress of the assessment required by the
Transportation Worker Identification Credential Security Card
Program Act (Pub. L. 114-278).

[FR Doc. 2019-24343 Filed 3-6-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73770-73771]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30748]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2011-0083]

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), this document provides the public notice that by a
document dated September 27, 2011, Genesis Worldwide Logistics (GWWL)
has petitioned the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for a waiver
of compliance from certain provisions of the Federal railroad safety
regulations contained at 49 CFR 223.11, 231.30, 229.47, 229.115 and
229.125. FRA assigned the petition Docket Number FRA-2011-0083.
    GWWL requests a waiver for TrackMobile 4650 used for in-plant
switching confined to the tracks and facility known as GWWL, located in
Houston, Harris County, Texas, of the following: 49 CFR 223.11,
Requirements for existing locomotives; 231.30, Locomotives used in
switching service; 229.47, Emergency brake valve; 229.115, Slip/slide
alarms; and 229.125, Headlights and auxiliary lights.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at http://www.regulations.gov and in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation's (DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey
Ave., SE., W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations
Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
    Communications received by January 13, 2012 will be considered by
FRA before final action is taken. Comments received after that date
will be considered as far as practicable.
    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages
19477-78), or online at http://www.dot.gov/privacy.html.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 22, 2011.
Robert C. Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Regulatory and Legislative
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-30748 Filed 11-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17098-17106]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04966]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2016 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-1068; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-189-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening of
comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier proposed airworthiness directive
(AD) for all Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500
series airplanes. The NPRM proposed to require installing an automatic
shutoff system for the center and auxiliary tank fuel boost pumps, as
applicable; installing a placard in the airplane flight deck if
necessary; replacing the P5-2 fuel system module assembly; installing
the ``uncommanded ON'' (UCO) protection system for the fuel boost
pumps; revising the airplane flight manual to advise the flightcrew of
certain operating restrictions for airplanes equipped with an automatic
shutoff system; and revising the maintenance program by incorporating
new airworthiness limitations for fuel tank systems to satisfy Special
Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 requirements. The NPRM was prompted
by fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. This action
revises the NPRM by proposing to require updated or additional actions
that are necessary for certain airplane configurations. We are
proposing this supplemental NPRM (SNPRM) to prevent operation of the
center and auxiliary tank fuel boost pumps with continuous low
pressure, which could lead to friction sparks or overheating in the
fuel pump inlet that could create a potential ignition source inside
the center and auxiliary fuel tanks. These conditions, in combination
with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and
consequent loss of the airplane. Since these actions impose an
additional burden over that proposed in the NPRM, we are reopening the
comment period to allow the public the chance to comment on these
proposed changes.

DATES: We must receive comments on this SNPRM by May 12, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For Boeing service information identified in this SNPRM, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone: 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    For BAE Systems service information identified in this SNPRM,
contact BAE Systems, Attention: Commercial Product Support, 600 Main
Street, Room S18C, Johnson City, NY 13790-1806; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet:
http://www.baesystems-ps.com/customersupport.
    You may view this referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-
227-1221. The referenced Boeing service bulletins are also available on
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2011-1068.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2011-
1068; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Baker, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6498; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-1068;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-189-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that
would apply to all Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -
500 series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on
October 12, 2011 (76 FR 63229) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM proposed to
require installing an automatic shutoff system for the center and
auxiliary tank fuel boost pumps, as

applicable; installing a placard in the airplane flight deck if
necessary; replacing the P5-2 fuel system module assembly; installing
the UCO protection system for the center and auxiliary tank fuel boost
pumps, as applicable; revising the airplane flight manual to advise the
flightcrew of certain operating restrictions for airplanes equipped
with an automatic shutoff system; and revising the maintenance program
by incorporating new airworthiness limitations for fuel tank systems to
satisfy Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 requirements.

Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued

    Since we issued the NPRM, we learned of certain inadequacies in the
referenced service information. Boeing has since developed, and we have
approved, revised service information. We have determined it is
necessary to mandate the revised service information, which includes
additional actions necessary for airplanes in certain configurations.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1210, dated August
2, 2010; Revision 1, dated May 13, 2011; and Revision 2, dated October
25, 2012. The service information describes procedures for replacing
the P5-2 fuel system module assembly for Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -
300, -400, and -500 airplanes.
    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1216, dated July
29, 2010; Revision 1, dated March 26, 2012; Revision 2, dated November
12, 2012; and Revision 3, dated July 16, 2014. The service information
describes procedures for installing an automatic shutoff system for the
center and auxiliary fuel tank boost pumps for Model 737-300, -400, and
-500 airplanes.
    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1227, dated August
2, 2010; Revision 1, dated July 18, 2011; and Revision 2, dated
September 23, 2014. The service information describes procedures for
installing a UCO protection system for the center and auxiliary fuel
boost pumps for Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500
airplanes.
    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1228, dated August
2, 2010; and Revision 1, dated June 28, 2012. The service information
describes procedures for installing an automatic shutoff system for the
center and auxiliary fuel tank boost pumps for Model 737-100, -200, and
-200C airplanes.
    We also reviewed Section C, ``Fuel Systems Airworthiness
Limitations,'' of Section 9 of the Boeing 737-100/200/200C/300/400/500
Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and Certification Maintenance
Requirements (CMRs), Document D6-38278-CMR, Revision June 2014,
contains AWLs 28-AWL-21, 28-AWL-22, 28-AWL-24, and 28-AWL-25 for Model
737-100, -200, and -200C airplanes, and AWLs 28-AWL-20, 28-AWL-21, 28-
AWL-23, and 28-AWL-24 for Model 737-300, -400, and -500 airplanes,
which are airworthiness limitation instructions for an operational
check of the installed automatic shutoff system.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to comment on the NPRM. The
following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's
response to each comment. The Air Line Pilots Association,
International, submitted its support for the NPRM.

Request To Match Compliance Times

    Japan Transocean Air requested that we revise paragraphs (g) and
(h) of the proposed AD to extend the compliance time from 36 months to
60 months to match the compliance time specified in paragraph (m) of
the proposed AD (in the NPRM). The commenter noted that the service
information specified in paragraph (m) of the proposed AD (in the NPRM)
recommends the concurrent accomplishment of the actions specified in
paragraph (g)(3) of the proposed AD. The commenter asserted that
requiring the same compliance time (60 months) for paragraphs (g), (h),
and (m) of the proposed AD (in the NPRM) would prevent complications
associated with different configurations.
    We disagree that it is necessary to revise the compliance time as
requested. We infer that the commenter has assumed that all of those
actions must be done at the same maintenance visit. As the commenter
stated, the ``concurrent'' actions (in paragraph (g)(3) of this
proposed AD) are to be done ``before or at the same time as'' the
actions required by paragraph (m) of this proposed AD. We have
determined that the compliance time for the actions specified in
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this proposed AD is necessary to ensure an
adequate level of safety. We have further determined that doing the
actions required by paragraph (m) of this proposed AD later than the
actions specified in paragraphs (g)(3) of this proposed AD would not
affect safety, and would not affect the airplane configuration in a way
that would complicate accomplishment of the proposed AD requirements
for the fleet. In light of the identified unsafe condition, the
proposed requirements, and the manufacturer's recommendations, we have
determined that no change to this proposed AD is warranted regarding
this issue.

Request To Require Two Placards

    Japan Transocean Air requested that we revise paragraph (i) of the
proposed AD (in the NPRM) to require the installation of two placards,
instead of one, adjacent to the primary flight displays. The commenter
stated that both pilots operate the fuel pumps, and placards are
therefore necessary for both pilots' primary flight displays.
    We partially agree with the request. The intent of this SNPRM is to
ensure that the placard is visible to both pilots. Although we have
determined that two placards are not necessary to achieve that goal,
operators may choose to install an additional placard or use a
different location, if approved by an appropriate FAA principal
operations inspector. We have revised paragraph (i) of this proposed AD
to specify these options.

Request To Correct Service Information Specifications

    Boeing requested certain corrections to the referenced service
information. Since that comment was submitted, Boeing has included
these corrections in the revised service information that is referenced
in this SNPRM. Therefore, no additional change to this SNPRM is
necessary.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this SNPRM because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Certain changes described above expand the scope of the NPRM. As a
result, we have determined that it is necessary to reopen the comment
period to provide additional opportunity for the public to comment on
this SNPRM.

Proposed Requirements of This SNPRM

    This SNPRM would require accomplishing the actions specified in the
service information described previously, except as discussed under

``Differences Between this AD and the Service Information.''

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information

    Where service information referenced in this proposed AD specifies
that certain operators may contact the manufacturer for modification
instructions, this proposed AD would require those operators to do the
modification in one of the following ways:
     In accordance with a method that we approve; or
     Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) whom we have
authorized to make those findings.
    Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1216, Revision 3, dated July
16, 2014, specifies a 24-month compliance time to accomplish the
actions specified in that service information. However, paragraph (g)
of this proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in that service information within 36 months. We have determined this
compliance time will provide an acceptable level of safety. We have
coordinated this difference with Boeing.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 499 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Action                    Labor cost                 Parts cost                    Cost per product             Cost on  U.S. operators
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Install auto shutoff protection   Between 92 and 155   Between $10,792 and $15,548 \1\  Between $18,612 and $28,723 \1\  Between $1,526,184 and
 for Model 737-100, -200, -200C    work-hours x $85                                                                       $2,355,286.\1\
 airplanes (82 airplanes).         per hours =
                                   Between $7,820 and
                                   $13,175 \1\.
Install auto shutoff protection   Between 92 and 152   Between $9,869 and $16,236 \1\.  Between $17,689 and $29,156 \1\  Between $7,376,313 and
 for Model 737-300, -400, and -    work-hours x $85                                                                       $12,158,052.\1\
 500 airplanes (417 airplanes).    per hours =
                                   Between $7,820 and
                                   $12,920 \1\.
Install P5-2 module.............  1 work-hour x $85    $0.............................  $85............................  $42,415.
                                   per hour = $85.
Install UCO protection (499       Between 38 and 67    Between $3,742 and $4,861 \1\..  Between $6,972 and $10,556 \1\.  Between $3,479,028 and
 airplanes).                       work-hours x $85                                                                       $5,267,444.\1\
                                   per hours =
                                   Between $3,230 and
                                   $5,695\1\.
Revise aircraft flight manual...  1 work-hour x $85    $0.............................  $85............................  $42,415.
                                   per hour = $85.
Revise Maintenance Program......  1 work-hour x $85    $0.............................  $85............................  $42,415.
                                   per hour = $85.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Depending on group.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs''
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2011-1068; Directorate Identifier
2010-NM-189-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by May 12, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    Certain requirements of this AD terminate certain requirements
of AD 2001-08-24, Amendment 39-12201 (66 FR 20733, April 25, 2001).

(c) Applicability

    This AD affects all The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -
200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes; certificated in any
category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to prevent operation of the
center and auxiliary tank fuel boost pumps with continuous low
pressure, which could lead to friction sparks or overheating in the
fuel pump inlet that could create a potential ignition source inside
the center and auxiliary fuel tanks. These conditions, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank
explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Installation of Automatic Shutoff System for the Center and
Auxiliary Tank Fuel Boost Pumps

    Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
applicable actions specified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3)
of this AD. If a placard has been previously installed on an
airplane, in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (i) of
this AD, the placard may be removed from the flight deck of only
that airplane after the automatic shutoff system has been installed,
as specified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD, as
applicable.
    (1) For Model 737-100, -200, and -200C series airplanes, in
Groups 2 through 19, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-28A1228, Revision 1, dated June 28, 2012: Install the automatic
shutoff system for the center and auxiliary fuel tank boost pumps,
as applicable, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1228, Revision 1, dated June
28, 2012. For airplanes that do not have airstairs, accomplishment
of the actions specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
28A1228, dated August 2, 2010, is acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of this paragraph, provided markers are installed on
the J2802 Box for ``POS 1'' and ``POS 2'' within 90 days after the
effective date of this AD, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-28A1228, Revision 1, dated June 28, 2012.
    (2) For Model 737-100, -200, and -200C series airplanes in Group
1, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1228,
Revision 1, dated June 28, 2012: Install the automatic shutoff
system for the center and auxiliary fuel tank boost pumps, as
applicable, using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (r) of this AD.
    (3) For Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes in Groups
1 through 31, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
28A1216, Revision 3, dated July 16, 2014: Install the automatic
shutoff system for the center and auxiliary fuel tank boost pumps,
as applicable, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1216, Revision 3, dated July
16, 2014. For airplanes that do not have airstairs: Accomplishment
of the actions specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-28A1216,
dated July 29, 2010, is acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of this paragraph, provided markers are installed on
the J2802 Box for ``POS 1'' and ``POS 2'' within 90 days after the
effective date of this AD, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-28A1216, Revision 1, dated March 26, 2012; or Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1216, Revision 2, dated November 12,
2012.

(h) Concurrent Installation of P5-2 Fuel System Module Assembly

    Before or concurrently with accomplishment of the actions
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, do the actions specified in
paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, as applicable. Accomplishment
of the actions specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
28A1210, dated August 2, 2010, or Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
28A1210, Revision 1, dated May 13, 2011, is acceptable for
compliance with the requirements of paragraph (h)(1) of this AD,
provided that for any original P5-2 Fuel System Module P/N 69-37335-
129 installed that has been reworked as specified in BAE Systems
Service Bulletin 69-37335-28-04, Revision 2, dated February 10,
2010, the P/N marking is etched/scribed or labeled as P/N 69-37335-
2129, within 90 days after the effective date of this AD.
    (1) For airplanes in Group 2, as identified in Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-28A1210, Revision 2, dated October 25, 2012: Replace
the P5-2 fuel system module assembly with a modified or new P5-2
fuel system module assembly having a new part number, in accordance
with Boeing Service Bulletin 737-28A1210, Revision 2, dated October
25, 2012.

    Note 1 to paragraph (h)(1) of this AD: Boeing Service Bulletin
737-28A1210, Revision 2, dated October 25, 2012, refers to BAE
Systems Service Bulletin 69-37335-28-04 as an additional source of
guidance for modifying and updating the existing P5-2 fuel system
module assembly part numbers.

    (2) For airplanes in Group 1, as identified in Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-28A1210, Revision 2, dated October 25, 2012, replace
the P5-2 fuel system module assembly, as applicable, using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph
(r) of this AD.

(i) Concurrent Installation of a Placard for Mixed Fleet Operation

    Concurrently with accomplishment of the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, install a placard adjacent to the pilot's
primary flight display on all airplanes in the operator's fleet not
equipped with an automatic shutoff system for the center and
auxiliary tank fuel boost pumps, as applicable. The placard must
include the statement in figure 1 to paragraph (i) of this AD.
Optionally, the placard may include alternative text or be installed
in a different location, or an additional placard may be installed,
if approved by an appropriate FAA principal operations inspector.
Installing an automatic shutoff system on an airplane, in accordance
with the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD, terminates the
placard installation required by this paragraph for only that
airplane.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28MR16.016

(j) Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revisions for Airplanes Without Boeing
Auxiliary Fuel Tanks

    For airplanes without Boeing auxiliary fuel tanks: Concurrently
with accomplishment of the actions required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, do the actions specified in paragraphs (j)(1) and (j)(2) of this
AD.
    (1) Revise Section 1 of the Limitations section of the
applicable Boeing 737 AFM to include the statement in figure 2 to
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. This may be done by inserting a copy of
this AD into the AFM. When a statement identical to that in figure 2
to paragraph (j)(1) of this AD has been included in the general
revisions of the applicable Boeing 737 AFM, the general revisions
may be inserted into the AFM, and the copy of this AD may be removed
from the AFM.

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28MR16.017

    (2) Revise Section 3 of the Normal Procedures section of the
applicable Boeing 737 AFM to include to include the text specified
in figure 3 to paragraph (j)(2) of this AD. This may be done by
inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM. Alternative statements
that meet the intent of the following requirements may be used if
approved by an appropriate FAA principal operations inspector.
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28MR16.018

(k) AFM Revisions for Airplanes With Boeing Auxiliary Fuel Tanks

    For airplanes with Boeing auxiliary fuel tanks: Concurrently
with accomplishment of the actions required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, do the actions specified in paragraphs (k)(1) and (k)(2) of this
AD.
    (1) Revise Section 1 of the Limitations section of the
applicable Boeing 737 AFM to include the text specified in figure 4
to paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. This may be done by inserting a copy
of this AD into the AFM. When a statement identical to that in
figure 4 to paragraph (k)(1) of this AD has been included in the
general revisions of the applicable Boeing 737 AFM, the general
revisions may be inserted into the AFM, and the copy of this AD may
be removed from the AFM.

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28MR16.019

    (2) Revise Section 3 of the Normal Procedures section of the
applicable Boeing 737 AFM to include the text specified in figure 5
to paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. This may be done by inserting a copy
of this AD into the AFM. Alternative statements that meet the intent
of the following requirements may be used if approved by an
appropriate FAA principal operations inspector.

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28MR16.020

BILLING CODE 4910-13-C

(l) Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) Revision for Automatic Shutoff
System

    Concurrently with accomplishment of the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, or within 30 days after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs later: Revise the maintenance program
by incorporating the AWLs specified in paragraphs (l)(1), (l)(2),
(l)(3), and (l)(4) of this AD, as applicable. The initial compliance
time for the actions specified in the applicable AWLs is within 1
year after accomplishment of the installation required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, or within 1 year after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later.
    (1) For Model 737-100, -200, and -200C series airplanes without
Boeing auxiliary fuel tanks installed: Incorporate AWL No. 28-AWL-21
of Section C, ``Fuel Systems Airworthiness Limitations,'' of Section
9 of the Boeing 737-100/200/200C/300/400/500 Airworthiness
Limitations (AWLs) and Certification Maintenance Requirements
(CMRs), Document D6-38278-CMR, Revision June 2014.
    (2) For Model 737-100, -200, and -200C series airplanes with
Boeing auxiliary fuel tanks installed: Incorporate AWL No. 28-AWL-21
and AWL No. 28-AWL-22 of Section C, ``Fuel Systems Airworthiness
Limitations,'' of Section 9 of the Boeing 737-100/200/200C/300/400/
500 Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and Certification Maintenance
Requirements (CMRs), Document D6-38278-CMR, Revision June 2014.
    (3) For Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes without
Boeing auxiliary fuel tanks installed: Incorporate AWL No. 28-

AWL-20 of Section C, ``Fuel Systems Airworthiness Limitations,'' of
Section 9 of the Boeing 737-100/200/200C/300/400/500 Airworthiness
Limitations (AWLs) and Certification Maintenance Requirements
(CMRs), Document D6-38278-CMR, Revision June 2014.
    (4) For Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes with
Boeing auxiliary fuel tanks installed: Incorporate AWL No. 28-AWL-20
and AWL No. 28-AWL-21 of Section C, ``Fuel Systems Airworthiness
Limitations,'' of Section 9 of the Boeing 737-100/200/200C/300/400/
500 Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and Certification Maintenance
Requirements (CMRs), Document D6-38278-CMR, Revision June 2014.

(m) Installation of Un-Commanded ON (UCO) Protection System

    Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions required by paragraph (m)(1) or (m)(2) of this AD, as
applicable.
    (1) For airplanes in Groups 2 through 13, as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1227, Revision 2, dated
September 23, 2014: Install the UCO protection system for the center
and auxiliary tank fuel boost pumps, as applicable, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-28A1227, Revision 2, dated September 23, 2014. For
airplanes with enlarged J2802 box assembly relay cutouts to fit the
body of relays R3334, R3336, R3338, or R3340, with BACS12HN08-10
screws for the installation of the relays as specified in
Information Notice 737-28A1227 IN 05: Accomplishment of the actions
specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1227, dated August
2, 2010, or Revision 1, dated July 18, 2011, is acceptable for
compliance with the requirements of this paragraph, provided markers
are installed that identify the function of the switches installed
on the J2802 box within 90 days after the effective date of this AD,
in accordance with figure 1 or figure 5, as applicable, of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1227, Revision 2, dated September 23,
2014.
    (2) For airplanes in Group 1, as identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-28A1227, Revision 2, dated September 23, 2014:
Install the UCO protection system for the center and auxiliary tank
fuel boost pumps, as applicable, using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (r) of this
AD.

(n) AWLs Revision for UCO Protection System

    Concurrently with accomplishment of the actions required by
paragraph (m) of this AD, or within 30 days after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs later: Revise the maintenance program
by incorporating the AWLs specified in paragraphs (n)(1), (n)(2),
(n)(3), and (n)(4) of this AD, as applicable. The initial compliance
time for the actions specified in applicable AWLs is within 1 year
after accomplishment of the installation required by paragraph (m)
of this AD, or within 1 year after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
    (1) For Model 737-100, -200, and -200C series airplanes without
Boeing auxiliary fuel tanks: Incorporate AWL No. 28-AWL-24 of
Section C, ``Fuel Systems Airworthiness Limitations,'' of Section 9
of the Boeing 737-100/200/200C/300/400/500 Airworthiness Limitations
(AWLs) and Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMRs), Document
D6-38278-CMR, Revision June 2014.
    (2) For Model 737-100, -200, and -200C series airplanes with
Boeing auxiliary fuel tanks: Incorporate AWL No. 28-AWL-24 and AWL
No. 28-AWL-25 of Section C, ``Fuel Systems Airworthiness
Limitations,'' of Section 9 of the Boeing 737-100/200/200C/300/400/
500 Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and Certification Maintenance
Requirements (CMRs), Document D6-38278-CMR, Revision June 2014.
    (3) For Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes without
Boeing auxiliary fuel tanks: Incorporate AWL No. 28-AWL-23 of
Section C, ``Fuel Systems Airworthiness Limitations,'' of Section 9
of the Boeing 737-100/200/200C/300/400/500 Airworthiness Limitations
(AWLs) and Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMRs), Document
D6-38278-CMR, Revision June 2014.
    (4) For Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes with
Boeing auxiliary fuel tanks: Incorporate AWL No. 28-AWL-23 and AWL
No. 28-AWL-24 of Section C, ``Fuel Systems Airworthiness
Limitations,'' of Section 9 of the Boeing 737-100/200/200C/300/400/
500 Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and Certification Maintenance
Requirements (CMRs), Document D6-38278-CMR, Revision June 2014.

(o) No Alternative Inspections or Inspection Intervals

    After accomplishment of the applicable actions specified in
paragraphs (l) and (n) of this AD, no alternative inspections or
inspection intervals may be used unless the inspections or
inspection intervals are approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (r) of this AD.

(p) Method of Compliance for Paragraph (l) of This AD

    Incorporating AWLs No. 28-AWL-21 and No. 28-AWL-22 for Model
737-100, -200, and -200C series airplanes; and AWLs No. 28-AWL-20
and No. 28-AWL-21 for Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series
airplanes; in accordance with paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of AD
2008-10-09 R1, Amendment 39-16148 (74 FR 69264, December 31, 2009),
is acceptable for compliance with the corresponding AWL
incorporation required by paragraph (l) of this AD.

(q) Method of Compliance for Paragraph (a) of AD 2001-08-24, Amendment
39-12201 (66 FR 20733, April 25, 2001)

    Accomplishment of the actions required by paragraphs (g), (h),
(i), and (l) of this AD, and paragraph (j) or (k) of this AD as
applicable, is an acceptable method of compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (a) of AD 2001-08-24, Amendment 39-12201
(66 FR 20733, April 25, 2001).

(r) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (s)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. To be approved, the
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.

(s) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Christopher
Baker, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle
ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6498; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, extension 1; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. For BAE Systems service information
identified in this AD, contact BAE Systems, Attention: Commercial
Product Support, 600 Main Street, Room S18C, Johnson City, NY 13790-
1806; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.baesystems-ps.com/customersupport. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 25, 2016.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-04966 Filed 3-25-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P